HomeMy WebLinkAbout52 - PH-2 - Attachment 9 - 5/5/2015ATTACHMENT 9
CORRESPONDENCE FROM PUBLIC
- �3 3B ,
P//I;xz
Date: April 9, 2015
From: Neighbors to Proposed Development
To: Costa Mesa Planning Commission
Subject. Concerns _about Proposed_ Development Plan of 1239 Victoria St.
(Application liicon No.; GP -14-03,_R-14-03, ati3,_R-1.-03, PA -14-19, VT -17779)
_.._ _ _. ...
Dear Commissioners,
We, the undersigned, would like to take this opportunity to present to the commission
our concerns and opposition to certain aspects of the proposed development plan.
First we want to make sure that we express the fact that we do not oppose the
development of the lot into residential units, It is in the city's master plan and an
appropriate use of the land in our opinion.
Our concerns are in the following areas:
Pri)Acy_of_t Npj_q hbors.
The "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states in section 4.4. that "Consideration shall be given to the effect of proposed
development on the light, air, and privacy of adjacent properties
The proposed plan will create these tall, overwhelming buildings that overlook its
neighbors. Many will have roof decks, Even without roof decks, the residents of these
building will be looking down over their neighbors' properties from a vantage point that
can cause privacy issues.
We, as property owners around the proposed development, have certain rights and
expectation to quite enjoyment of our properties. The imposing buildings with roof deck
and third story windows overlooking our backyard from 2 stories above can definitely
cause concern for our privacy, and can curtail our ability to enjoy outdoor activities.
Impact tofV ghborhood Parking
With the proposed number of parking spaces, it will be a certainty that many vehicles
belonging to the residents or visitors will have to be parked outside of the development.
Since the strip mall is a private property, the most likely overflow for their parking issue
will be Malley Road, If you visit Valley Road, you will find that parking there is already at
a premium; and the additional cars will simply add to the congestion.
Number of Deviations to Code
Even if the city go ahead with High Density Residential zoning, the number of request
for variation from code requirements is highly alarming.
The builder is pushing to change the current development standard of R2 -HD for its
project so that:
1. The required rear setback of 20 ft to reduce to 10 ft
2. The maximum number of stories of 2 increased to 3 plus a roof deck
3. The required front setback of 20 ft reduced to 14 ft
4. The required open space rate of 40% reduced to 34.95%
The requests are all attempts to squeeze more square footage into each unit, thus
increasing the sale price at the expense of quality of life.
Table 13-32 of the "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa
city's website clearly states that according to Costa Mesa Municipal Code for R2 -HD
zone the following need to be followed:
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft
b) 40% Minimum Open Space
c) Front setback of 20 ft
d) Rear setback of 20 ft for 2 Story Building
The "Residential Design Guidelines" document also from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states that for R2 -HD zone the following need to be followed:
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft for sloped roof design (section 73)
b) 2 Stories and Maximum of 22 ft for flat roof design (which should cover the roof
deck type design) and must be consistent with the bulk and scale of the
structures in the surroundin nei hborhood (section 7.3)
Code requirements exist for a reason. We believe it is the responsibility of the Planning
Commission to ensure that the proper requirements are met by the developer, and not
become complicit in the builder's attempt to maximize profit.
Impact to Property --Value around the Develo rnent
The new building being so tall will certainly block the view of some neighbors and
reduce free movement of breeze. Combined with the issues of privacy and more
congested street parking, may negatively impact property value. It will be a travesty to
enrich the coffers of the developer at the same time sacrifice the value of home around
the new development. The city should be protecting the interest of its residents and not
simply kowtow to the wishes of the developer.
- 3:E35--
Welfare of the Residents who will be Living In the Development
There have been several studies that link high density living to negative effects to
people's health, happiness, and safety.
Health
1. High density living is associated with higher risks of psychosis (70% higher)
and depression (16% higher).
2. Higher level of stress caused by high density living can lead to twice as high
incidence of schizophrenia.
3. Absence of green space causes adverse mental problems.
The prevalence of depression and anxiety was significantly greater for those
living in areas with only 10% green space in their surroundings compared to
those with 90% green space.
4. Children living in high density areas suffer much higher rate of behavioral
problems such as anti -social behaviors.
5. Restricted length of vision and exposure to noises cause children in high
density homes to have short-sightedness and auditory discrimination.
6. Air pollution — higher density living increases the level of air pollution. Air
pollution affects residents' respiratory system and results in lower birth weight.
Source: http:/!www.ne�,vgepgraphy.comfcontent/0.03945-he,alth-happirn_ess--
and-density
Happiness
Studies show that the higher the density of living, the less happy the residents.
Lack of privacy, imposed social interacts, noises, difficulty in parking... all
contribute to a less satisfied papulation.
Source: http:/!-'Ww.newaeorgraphy.rom/content!00394a-health-happiness-
and -density
Safety
Even though the zoning and traffic analysis may specify that the number of car
trips is acceptable, as people who live in and around the area, we witnessed
many accidents around the area because of the hill and blind corners, and the
fact that most drivers tend to accelerate when going downhill.
In the latest available report of California Office of Traffic Safety, Costa Mesa
was the fifth worst among all 56 cities at its size. It is hard to convince anyone
that high density building will improve this ranking.
Source: http:/i4,r`vvvv.ots.ca,gov Med€a_and Research/Rankings/default.asp
We are also concerned that items blown from the proposed roof -top decks
proposed by the developer such as umbrella, lamp, or flower pots in high wind
may cause serious injury and property damage to the residents and their
neighbors.
Our Recommendation
1) Rezone to Medium Density Residential with 12 units per acre
•E
2) If the city determines the High Density Residential is appropriate, then ensure all
code requirement are met and not permit deviations:
a. Allow maximum of 2 stories
b. No roof decks
c. Require compliance to code requirement for front and rear setbacks
d. Require compliance to code requirement of open space
To conclude, we trust that the Planning Commission will do the right thing and ensure
the quality of life, and that current property owners' and residents' interests are
protected by allowing only reasonable development that adhere to code to happen.
Thank you,
Name, Address and Signature of Supporters of this Letter
41# -oz
Date: April 9, 2015
From: Neighbors to Proposed Development
To: Costa Mesa Planning Commission
Subject: Concerns about Proms ed Development Plan of 1239 Victoria St.
(Application No.: GP -14 -03,R -14-d3, PA -14-19, VT -17779)
Dear Commissioners,
We, the undersigned, would like to take this opportunity to present to the commission
our concerns and opposition to certain aspects of the proposed development plan.
First we want to make sure that we express the fact that we do not oppose the
development of the lot into residential units. It is in the city's master plan and an
appropriate use of the land in our opinion.
Our concerns are in the following areas:
Privacy of the Neighbors
The "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states in section 4,4. that "Consideration shall be given to the effect of proposed
development on the light, air, and privacy ofadiacent properties".
The proposed pian will create these tali, overwhelming buildings that overlook its
neighbors. Many will have roof decks. Even without roof decks, the residents of these
building will be looking down over their neighbors' properties from a vantage point that
can cause privacy issues,
We, as property owners around the proposed development, have certain rights and
expectation to quite enjoyment of our properties. The imposing buildings with roof deck
and third story windows overlooking our backyard from 2 stories above can definitely
cause concern for our privacy, and can curtail our ability to enjoy outdoor activities.
Im.pgct_tpNeighhb_orhood Parking
With the proposed number of parking spaces, it will be a certainty that many vehicles
belonging to the residents or visitors will have to be parked outside of the development.
Since the strip mall is a private property, the most likely overflow for their parking issue
will be Malley Road. If you visit Malley Road, you will find that parking there is already at
a premium, and the additional cars will simply add to the congestion,
33�
Number of Deviations to Code
Even if the city go ahead with High Density Residential zoning, the number of request
for variation from code requirements is highly alarming,
The builder is pushing to change the current development standard of R2 -HD for its
project so that:
1, The required rear setback of 20 fit to reduce to 10 ft
2. The maximum number of stories of 2 increased to 3 plus a roof deck
3. The required front setback of 20 ft reduced to 14 ft
4. The required open space rate of 40% reduced to 34.95%
The requests are all attempts to squeeze more square footage into each unit, thus
increasing the sale price at the expense of quality of life.
Table 13-32 of the "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa
city's website clearly states that according to Costa Mesa Municipal Code for R2 -HD
zone the following need to be followed:
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft
b) 40% Minimum Open Space
c) Front setback of 20 ft
d) Rear setback of 20 ft for 2 Story Building
The "Residential Design Guidelines" document also from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states that for R2 -HD zone the following need to be followed:
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft for sloped roof design (section 7.3)
b) 2 Stories and Maximum of 22 ft for flat roof design (which should cover the roof
deck type design) and must _be consistent with the_bulk and scale of the
structures in the surrounding neighborhood (section 7.3)
Code requirements exist for a reason. We believe it is the responsibility of the Planning
Commission to ensure that the proper requirements are met by the developer, and not
become complicit in the builder's attempt to maximize profit.
Impact to Property Value around the Development
The new building being so tail will certainly block the view of some neighbors and
reduce free movement of breeze, Combined with the issues of privacy and more
congested street parking, may negatively impact property value. It will be a travesty to
enrich the coffers of the developer at the same time sacrifice the value of home around
the new development. The city should be protecting the interest of its residents and not
simply kowtow to the wishes of the developer.
— 33q,
Welfare of the Residents who will be Living in the Development
There have been several studies that link high density living to negative effects to
people's health, happiness, and safety.
Health
1. High density living is associated with higher risks of psychosis (70% higher)
and depression (16% higher),
2, Higher level of stress caused by high density living can lead to twice as high
incidence of schizophrenia.
3. Absence of green space causes adverse mental problems.
The prevalence of depression and anxiety was significantly greater for those
living in areas with only 10% green space in their surroundings compared to
those with 90% green space.
4. Children living in high density areas suffer much higher rate of behavioral
problems such as anti -social behaviors.
5. Restricted length of vision and exposure to noises cause children in high
density homes to have short-sightedness and auditory discrimination.
6. Air pollution – higher density living increases the level of air pollution. Air
pollution affects residents' respiratory system and results in lower birth weight.
Source: http;//aAAvw.newgepgraphy._corn/contenU003Q45-health-happiness-
and -density
Happiness
Studies show that the higher the density of living, the less happy the residents.
Lack of privacy, imposed social interacts, noises, difficulty in parking...all
contribute to a less satisfied population.
Source: http:/!wvw,N,newgeography,pomlcontent1003945-health-ha.pp.iness-
and -density
Safe
Even though the zoning and traffic analysis may specify that the number of car
trips is acceptable, as people who live in and around the area, we witnessed
many accidents around the area because of the hill and blind corners, and the
fact that most drivers tend to accelerate when going downhill.
In the latest available report of California Office of Traffic Safety, Costa Mesa
was the fifth worst among all 56 cities at its size, It is hard to convince anyone
that high density building will improve this ranking.
Source: http://wwv ,ots.ca,gov!.Media and_ResearchI.Rankings/defauit.asp
—3-4c).—
We are also concerned that items blown from the proposed roof -top decks
proposed by the developer such as umbrella, lamp, or flower pots in high wind
may cause serious injury and property damage to the residents and their
neighbors.
Our Recommendation
1) Rezone to Medium Density Residential with 12 units per acre
2) If the city determines the High Density Residential is appropriate, then ensure all
code requirement are met and not permit deviations:
a. Allow maximum of 2 stories
b. No roof decks
c. Require compliance to code requirement for front and rear setbacks
d. Require compliance to code requirement of open space
To conclude, we trust that the Planning Commission will do the right thing and ensure
the quality of life, and that current property owners' and residents' interests are
protected by allowing only reasonable development that adhere to code to happen.
Thank you.
I
Name, Address and
J4 �
LEE, MEL
From: James Hsu <jhsu@h2exec.com>
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 8:55 AM
To: LEE, MEL; FLYNN, CLAIRE; rdickson.cmpc@gmail.com
Subject: Concerns about Development Plans of 1239 Victoria St
Attachments: Concern about 1239 Victoria Development - Signed by HSU.PDF
Dear Planning Commission Members,
?R -z
I am a resident of Westbluff and our community is adjacent to the proposed development on 1239 Victoria St. We are
circulating a letter of concern about the proposed development plan for signature and they should be sent to you this
morning by Chris Webster, one of our residents. I am sending you my signed copy just in case even though it may be
duplicated. Please forgive me for being overly cautious.
Thank you and we hope that our concerns will be addressed at the upcoming meeting on Monday.
James Hsu
- 342,
Date: April 9, 2015
From: Neighbors to Proposed Development
To: Costa Mesa Planning Commission
Subject: Concerns about Proposed Development Plan of 1239 Victoria St.
(Application No.: GP -14-03, R-1.4-03, PA -1.4-19, VT -17779)
Dear Commissioners,
We, the undersigned, would like to take this opportunity to present to the commission
our concerns and opposition to certain aspects of the proposed development plan.
First we want to make sure that we express the fact that we do not oppose the
development of the lot into residential units. It is in the city's master plan and an
appropriate use of the land in our opinion.
Our concerns are in the following areas:
Privacv of the Neiahbors
The "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states in section 4.4. that "Consideration shall be given to the effect of proposed
development on the light, air, and privacy of adjacent properties".
The proposed plan will create these tall, overwhelming buildings that overlook its
neighbors. Many will have roof decks. Even without roof decks, the residents of these
building will be looking down over their neighbors' properties from a vantage point that
can cause privacy issues.
We, as property owners around the proposed development, have certain rights and
expectation to quite enjoyment of our properties. The imposing buildings with roof deck
and third story windows overlooking our backyard from 2 stories above can definitely
cause concern for our privacy, and can curtail our ability to enjoy outdoor activities.
Impact to Neighborhood Parking
With the proposed number of parking spaces, it will be a certainty that many vehicles
belonging to the residents or visitors will have to be parked outside of the development.
Since the strip mall is a private property, the most likely overflow for their parking issue
will be Valley Road. If you visit Valley Road, you will find that parking there is already at
a premium, and the additional cars will simply add to the congestion.
Number of Deviations to Code
Even if the city go ahead with High Density Residential zoning, the number of request
for variation from code requirements is highly alarming.
The builder is pushing to change the current development standard of R2 -HD for its
project so that:
1. The required rear setback of 20 ft to reduce to 10 ft
2. The maximum number of stories of 2 increased to 3 plus a roof deck
3. The required front setback of 20 ft reduced to 14 ft
4. The required open space rate of 40% reduced to 34.95%
The requests are all attempts to squeeze more square footage into each unit, thus
increasing the sale price at the expense of quality of life.
Table 13-32 of the "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa
city's website clearly states that according to Costa Mesa Municipal Code for R2 -HD
zone the following need to be followed:
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft
b) 40% Minimum Open Space
c) Front setback of 20 ft
d) Rear setback of 20 ft for 2 Story Building
The "Residential Design Guidelines" document also from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states that for R2 -HD zone the following need to be followed:
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft for sloped roof design (section 7.3)
b) 2 Stories and Maximum of 22 ft for flat roof design (which should cover the roof
deck type design) and must be consistent with the bulk and scale of the
structures in the surrounding neighborhood (section 7.3)
Code requirements exist for a reason. We believe it is the responsibility of the Planning
Commission to ensure that the proper requirements are met by the developer, and not
become complicit in the builder's attempt to maximize profit.
Impact to Propertv Value around the Development
The new building being so tall will certainly block the view of some neighbors and
reduce free movement of breeze. Combined with the issues of privacy and more
congested street parking, may negatively impact property value. It will be a travesty to
enrich the coffers of the developer at the same time sacrifice the value of home around
the new development. The city should be protecting the interest of its residents and not
simply kowtow to the wishes of the developer.
:;?.AA
__._
Welfare of the Residents who will be Living in the Development
There have been several studies that link high density living to negative effects to
people's health, happiness, and .safety.
Health
1. High density living is associated with higher risks of psychosis (70% higher)
and depression (16% higher).
2. Higher level of stress caused by high density living can lead to twice as high
incidence of schizophrenia.
3. Absence of green space causes adverse mental problems.
The prevalence of depression and anxiety was significantly greater for those
living in areas with only 10% green space in their surroundings compared to
those with 90% green space.
4. Children living in high density areas suffer much higher rate of behavioral
problems such as anti -social behaviors.
5. Restricted length of vision and exposure to noises cause children in high
density homes to have short-sightedness and auditory discrimination.
6. Air pollution — higher density living increases the level of air pollution. Air
pollution affects residents' respiratory system and results in lower birth
weight.
Source: hftp://www.newgeography.com/content/003945-health-happiness-
and-density
Happiness
Studies show that the higher the density of living, the less happy the residents.
Lack of privacy, imposed social interacts, noises, difficulty in parking... all
contribute to a less satisfied population.
Source: hftp://www.newgeography.com/content/003945-health-happiness-
and-density
Safe
Even though the zoning and traffic analysis may specify that the number of car
trips is acceptable, as people who live in and around the area, we witnessed
many accidents around the area because of the hill and blind corners, and the
fact that most drivers tend to accelerate when going downhill.
In the latest available report of California Office of Traffic Safety, Costa Mesa
was the fifth worst among all 56 cities at its size. It is hard to convince anyone
that high density building will improve this ranking.
Source: hftp://www.ots.ca.gov/Media and Research/Rankings/default.asp
We are also concerned that items blown from the proposed roof -top decks
proposed by the developer such as umbrella, lamp, or flower pots in high wind
may cause serious injury and property damage to the residents and their
neighbors.
Our Recommendation
1) Rezone to Medium Density Residential with 12 units per acre
A:7
2) If the city determines the High Density Residential is appropriate, then ensure all
code requirement are met and not permit deviations:
a. Allow maximum of 2 stories
b. No roof decks
c. Require compliance to code requirement for front and rear setbacks
d. Require compliance to code requirement of open space
To conclude, we trust that the Planning Commission will do the right thing and ensure
the quality of life, and that current property owners' and residents' interests are
protected by allowing only reasonable development that adhere to code to happen.
Thank you.
JAMES HSU & SHEREE HSU
1 VALLEY RD., COSTA MESA, CA 92527
ate -
Name, Address and Signature of Supporters of this Letter
-3-4 �--,
N,gZ
Date: April 9, 2015
From: Neighbors to Proposed Development
To: Costa Mesa Planning Commission
Subject Concerns about Proposed Development Plan of 1239 Victoria St.
(Application No.: GP -14-03, R-14-03, PA -14-19, VT -177791
Dear Commissioners,
We, the undersigned, would like to take this opportunity to present to the commission
our concerns and opposition to certain aspects of the proposed development plan.
First we want to make sure that we express the fact that we do not oppose the
development of the lot into residential units. It is in the city's master plan and an
appropriate use of the land in our opinion.
Our concerns are in the following areas;
Privacv of the Nei-ahbors
The "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states in section 4.4. that "Consideration shall be given to the effect of proposed
development on the light, air, and fr})/acy of adjacent properties".
The proposed plan will create these tall, overwhelming buildings that overlook its
neighbors. Many will have roof decks. Even without roof decks, the residents of these
building will be looking down over their neighbors' properties from a vantage point that
can cause privacy issues.
We, as property owners around the proposed development, have certain rights and
expectation to quite enjoyment of our properties, The imposing buildings with roof deck
and third story windows overlooking our backyard from 2 stories above can definitely
cause concern for our privacy, and can curtail our ability to enjoy outdoor activities.
Impact to Neighborhood Parking
With the proposed number of parking spaces, it will be a certainty that many vehicles
belonging to the residents or visitors will have to be parked outside of the development.
Since the strip mall is a private property, the most likely overflow for their parking issue
will be galley Road. If you visit Malley Road, you will find that parking there is already at
a premium, and the additional cars will simply add to the congestion.
3el (I —
Number of Deviations to Code
Even if the city go ahead with High Density Residential zoning, the number of request
for variation from code requirements is highly alarming,
The builder is pushing to change the current development standard of R2 -HD for its
project so that:
I The required rear setback of 20 ft to reduce to 10 ft
2 The maximum number of stories of 2 increased to 3 plus a roof deck
3. The required front setback of 20 ft reduced to 14 ft
4. The required open space rate of 40% reduced to 34-95%
The requests are all attempts to squeeze more square footage into each unit, thus
increasing the sale price at the expense of quality of life.
Table 13-32 of the "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa
city's website clearly states that according to Costa Mesa Municipal Code for R2 -HD
zone the following need to be followed. -
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft
b) 40% Minimum Open Space
C) Front setback of 20 ft
d) Rear setback of 20 ft for 2 Story Building
The "Residential Design Guidelines' document also from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states that for R2 -HD zone the following need to be followed:
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft for sloped roof design (section 7.3)
b) 2 Stories and Maximum of 22 ft for flat roof design (which should cover the roof
deck type design) and must be consistent with the bulk and scale of the
structures in the surrounding neighborhood (section 7.3)
Code requirements exist for a reason, We believe it is the responsibility of the Planning
Commission to ensure that the proper requirements are met by the developer. and not
become complicit in the builder's attempt to maximize profit.
Impact to Property Value around the Development
The new building being so tall will certainly block the view of some neighbors and
reduce free movement of breeze. Combined with the issues of privacy and more
congested street parking, may negatively impact property value. It will be a travesty to
enrich the coffers of the developer at the same time sacrifice the value of home around
the new development. The city should be protecting the interest of its residents and not
simply kowtow to the wishes of the developer.
— 3-1�� .--
Welfare of the Residents who will be Living in the ❑evellopment
There have been several studies that link high density living to negative effects to
people's health, happiness, and safety,
Health
1. High density living is associated with higher risks of psychosis (70% higher)
and depression (16% higher).
2. Higher level of stress caused by high density living can lead to twice as high
incidence of schizophrenia.
3. Absence of green space causes adverse mental problems.
The prevalence of depression and anxiety was significantly greater for those
living in areas with only 10% green space in their surroundings compared to
those with 90% green space.
4, Children living in high density areas suffer much higher rate of behavioral
problems such as anti-sociai behaviors.
5. Restricted length of vision and exposure to noises cause children in high
density homes to have short-sightedness and auditory discrimination.
& Air pollution —higher density living increases the level of air pollution, Air
pollution affects residents' respiratory system and results in lower birth weight.
Happiness
Studies show that the higher the density of living, the less happy the residents.
Lack of privacy, imposed social interacts, noises, difficulty in parking...all
contribute to a less satisfied population.
Safet
Y
Even though the zoning and traffic analysis may specify that the number of car
trips is acceptable, as people who live in and around the area, we witnessed
many accidents around the area because of the hill and blind corners, and the
fact that most drivers tend to accelerate when going downhill.
In the latest available report of California Office of Traffic Safety, Costa Mesa
was the fifth worst among all 56 cities at its size, It is hard to convince anyone
that high density building will improve this ranking,
We are also concerned that items blown from the proposed roof -top decks
proposed by the developer such as umbrella, lamp, or flower pots in high wind
may cause serious injury and property damage to the residents and their
neighbors,
Our Recommendation
1) Rezone to Medium Density Residential with 12 units per acre
Em
2) If the city determines the High Density Residential is appropriate, then ensure all
code requirement are met and not permit deviations:
a. Allow maximum of 2 stories
b. No roof decks
c. Require compliance to code requirement for front and rear setbacks
d. Require compliance to code requirement of open space
To conclude, we trust that the Planning Commission will do the right thing and ensure
the quality of life, and that current property owners' and residents' interests are
protected by allowing only reasonable development that adhere to code to happen.
Thank you.
Cs.
Name, Address and Signature of Supporters of this Letter
-- 350 -
�,az
LEE, MEL
From: Amber J. Webster <amberjia@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:22 PM
To: rdickson.cmpc@gmail.com; LEE, MEL; FLYNN, CLAIRE
Cc: Chris Webster; James Hsu; live4today; Emira Pajevic; Guitar Hoang; Jim Drennen;
joewoldenberg@irvinecompany.com; Janice Spriggs
Subject: Letter of Opposition
Dear Sir or Madam:
We are writing to oppose to the planned three-story residential buildings with rooftop decks at 1239 Victoria
Street by Trumark Homes, the representative of the property owner Westar Holdings, Inc.
This piece of property is currently zoned as Administrative and Professional (AP) District. Trumark Homes is
asking to rezone this property to R2 -HD (Multiple -Family Residential District, High Density). Worse yet,
Trumark Homes is pushing to change the current development standard of R2 -HD for its project so that:
1. The required rear setback of 20 feet can be 10
2. The maximum number of stories of 2 can be 3 plus a roof deck
3. The required front setback of 20 feet can be 14 feet
4. The required open space rate of 40% can be 34.95%
First of all, even if this place is rezoned into R2 -HD, the standard of R2 -HD should not be changed. You
approved the standard of R2 -HD. You must have set the standard this way for a good reason. So please stick to
it. Please do not allow cutting corners in any development! If you allow it, the only one who is going to benefit
from it is the developer. Everyone else, existing residents of houses around this property, new residents of the
new buildings, you, and the City of Costa Mesa, loses.
Secondly, if you can, please rezone this piece of property into a low, or even medium, density residential
area. This piece of property is at such a great location that our city does not have too many anymore. Please
think about what you would like that place to look like three decades from now. What you allow to be built
there now will be what it looks like three decades after.
Research shows that high density living has significant negative impact on residents' health, happiness, and
safety: 70% higher risk of psychosis, children's much higher rate of behavioral problems, lower birth weight,
etc.
-35,0 A -
You were elected by people of Costa Mesa to protect and improve Costa Mesa. Please do not allow anybody to
ruin this city and its people!
We thank you for your service. We ask you to use your power to forbid the wrongs and advance the rights.
Sincerely yours,
Chris and Amber Webster
-,3'5I-
Date: April 9, 2015
From: Neighbors to Proposed Development
To: Costa Mesa Planning Commission
Subject: Concerns about Proposed Development Plan of 1239 Victoria St.
(Application No.: GP -14-43, R-14-43, PA -14-19, VT -177791
Dear Commissioners,
We, the undersigned, would like to take this opportunity to present to the commission
our concerns and opposition to certain aspects of the proposed development plan.
First we want to make sure that we express the fact that we do not oppose the
development of the lot into residential units. It is in the city's master plan and an
appropriate use of the land in our opinion.
Our concerns are in the following areas:
Priysc_of _the .._Neighbors
The "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states in section 4.4, that "Consideration shall be given to the effect of proposed
development on the light, air, and privacy of adiacent properties",
The proposed plan will create these tall, overwhelming buildings that overlook its
neighbors. Many will have roof decks. Even without roof decks, the residents of these
building will be looking down over their neighbors properties from a vantage point that
can cause privacy issues.
We, as property owners around the proposed development, have certain rights and
expectation to quite enjoyment of our properties, The imposing buildings with roof deck
and third story windows overlooking our backyard from 2 stories above can definitely
cause concern for our privacy, and can curtail our ability to enjoy outdoor activities.
Impact to_Neighborhoo_d. Parkl..ng
With the proposed number of parking spaces, it will be a certainty that many vehicles
belonging to the residents or visitors will have to be parked outside of the development.
Since the strip mall is a private property, the most likely overflow for their parking issue
will be Valley Road. If you visit Valley Road, you will find that parking there is already at
a premium, and the additional cars will simply add to the congestion.
-352---
Number of Deviations to Code
Even if the city go ahead with High Density Residential zoning, the number of request
for variation from code requirements is highly alarming.
The builder is pushing to change the current development standard of R2 -HD for its
project so that:
1. The required rear setback of 20 ft to reduce to 10 ft
2. The maximum number of stories of 2 increased to 3 plus a roof deck
3. The required front setback of 20 ft reduced to 14 ft
4. The required open space rate of 40% reduced to 34.95%
The requests are all attempts to squeeze more square footage into each unit, thus
increasing the sale price at the expense of quality of life.
Table 13-32 of the "Residential Development Standards" document from Costa Mesa
city's website clearly states that according to Costa Mesa Municipal Code for R2 -HD
zone the following need to be followed:
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft
b) 40% Minimum ®pen Space
c) Front setback of 20 ft
d) Rear setback of 20 ft for 2 Story Building
The "Residential Design Guidelines" document also from Costa Mesa city's website
clearly states that for R2 -HD zone the following need to be followed:
a) 2 Stories and Maximum of 27 ft for sloped roof design (section 7.3)
b) 2 Stories and Maximum of 22 ft for flat roof design (which should cover the roof
deck type design) and must be consistent with the bulk and scale of the
structures in the surround hborhood (section 7.3)
Code requirements exist for a reason. We believe it is the responsibility of the Planning
Commission to ensure that the proper requirements are met by the developer, and not
become complicit in the builder's attempt to maximize profit.
imPaot to Property..V.a9ue around the Development
The new building being so tall will certainly block the view of some neighbors and
reduce free movement of breeze. Combined with the issues of privacy and more
congested street parking, may negatively impact property value. It will be a travesty to
enrich the coffers of the developer at the same time sacrifice the value of home around
the new development. The city should be protecting the interest of its residents and not
simply kowtow to the wishes of the developer.
—3s3—
Welfare of the Residents who will be Living in the Development
There have been several studies that link high density living to negative effects to
people's health, happiness, and safety.
Health
1. High density living is associated with higher risks of psychosis (70% higher)
and depression (16% higher).
2. Higher level of stress caused by high density living can lead to twice as high
incidence of schizophrenia.
3. Absence of green space causes adverse mental problems.
The prevalence of depression and anxiety was significantly greater for those
living in areas with only 10% green space in their surroundings compared to
those with 90% green space.
4. Children living in high density areas suffer much higher rate of behavioral
problems such as anti -social behaviors.
5. Restricted length of vision and exposure to noises cause children in high
density homes to have short-sightedness and auditory discrimination.
6. Air pollution — higher density living increases the level of air pollution. Air
pollution affects residents' respiratory system and results in lower birth weight.
Source: hlp:frwww.newaeography.com/(;ontent/003945-health-happiness_-
and-denst<y
Ha p ness
Studies show that the higher the density of living, the less happy the residents.
Lack of privacy, imposed social interacts, noises, difficulty in parking... all
contribute to a less satisfied population.
Source: http://w ymv.new.g ...... hy.com/contenU003945 health happiness_
and density
Safety
Even though the zoning and traffic analysis may specify that the number of car
trips is acceptable, as people who live in and around the area, we witnessed
many accidents around the area because of the hill and blind corners, and the
fact that most drivers tend to accelerate when going downhill.
In the latest available report of California Office of Traffic Safety, Costa Mesa
was the fifth worst among all 56 cities at its size. It is hard to convince anyone
that high density building will improve this ranking.
Source: http://�,N-vAAv.ots, Ia.gov/Media and Research/Ra nkingsldefault. _asp
3Z5:1-
We are also concerned that items blown from the proposed roof -top decks
proposed by the developer such as umbrella, lamp, or flower pots in high wind
may cause serious injury and property damage to the residents and their
neighbors,
Our Recommendation
1) Rezone to Medium Density Residential with 12 units per acre
eo
2) If the city determines the High Density Residential is appropriate, then ensure all
code requirement are met and not permit deviations:
a. Allow maximum of 2 stories
b. No roof decks
c. Require compliance to code requirement for front and rear setbacks
d. Require compliance to code requirement of open space
To conclude, we trust that the Planning Commission will do the right thing and ensure
the quality of life, and that current property owners' and residents' interests are
protected by allowing only reasonable development that adhere to code to happen,
Thank you.
Name, Address and Signature of Supporters of this Letter
— 3S5