HomeMy WebLinkAbout- - Additional Documents - 5/5/2015CC -3 ADDITIONAL DOCS
Payment
Date
Remittance to:
Remittance
Payment
Explanation of payment
Ref.
ID:
Amount
0188143
4/24/15
Southern California
4695
$1,278.00
What part of Gisler do we lease?
Edison Company
The annual lease payment to SCE for the use of 1.5 acres that make up the
western % of Gisler Park. This has been in place for over 16 years.
0188152
4/24/15
Surfas Inc
23303
$12,558.36
Did we compare prices here?
Yes. Finance went through a bid process and obtained three competitive
bids. This price was for 4 units and commercial stainless steel tables.
Commercial refrigerator and commercial freezer for Jack Hammett Sports
Complex and TeWinkle Sports Complex city snack bars.
0188172
4/24/15
United States
7179
$4,550.00
What was this for? Fairview Park
Treasury
What did they do for us?
The IRS has impounded Endemic's accounts and all payments are going to
the IRS. The work that we paid for is for Fairview Park and includes the last
quarterly monitoring ($2,000) and report ($2,000) for the Wetlands and
Riparian Habitat Restoration Project, Phase II; two nest surveys at $150
Each (one for the north end of the park south of swan Drive and one for the
south end of the park east and west of Pacific Avenue) for tree trimming
and maintenance; and $250 for weed removal and disposal.
000907
4/17/15
Quick Crete
7039
$4,233.60
How many and where?
Products Corp Inc
Various locations throughout the City. New trash can liners and metal lids
for decorative trash receptacles were purchased for several bus stops that
were the source of numerous complaints from the public recently. These
items are proprietary; they are made by Quick Crete to fit the product line
of trash receptacles we use at bus stops. 20 lids @ $130
20 liners @ $66
0187912
4/17/15
Stotz Equipment
23211
$13,239.72
How many rakes? Why so expensive?
The $13, 239.72 payment is for the purchase of a John Deere bunker and
field rake machine. This specialty equipment is a motorized self-contained
work horse that has all the features necessary to prepare baseball and
softball fields for play. City staff typically complete over 1,400 ballfield
preparations annually with the existing machine.
CC -11 #2 HAS BEEN ADDED
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH MIKE LINARES
This Amendment is made and entered into this 1St day of July 2015 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
MIKE LINARES, INC., a California Corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on September 2nd,
2014, for Consultant to serve as an independent contractor to provide CDBG/HOME
Coordinator services (the "Agreement") as more fully described in Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, the original Agreement contained a provision for an initial term of
One (1) year with the option to extend the Agreement for up to four (4) one year periods;
and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City wish to amend the Agreement to exercise the
first extension; and
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 4. 1, Term, shall be changed to read, "This Agreement shall
commence on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2016, unless
previously terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in
writing by the parties. At the end of the term period, Consultant and City
may mutually agree, in writing, to renew the contract for up to three (3)
term periods of one (1) year each."
2. Paragraph 2.1 of the original Agreement shall be amended to read, "As
compensation for the provision of services outlined in Exhibit "A" and in
accordance with this agreement, Consultant shall be paid in accordance
with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit `B," attached hereto and
incorporated by reference. Consultant's total compensation shall not
exceed Eight Five Thousand Dollars ($85,000.00) during Fiscal Year 2015-
2016.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment and previous Amendments, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
1 Mike Linares Amend 1-2015
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Chief Executive Officer
Department Director
CONSULTANT
Signature
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Project Manager
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
2 Mike Linares Amend 1-2015
ATTEST:
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
Of the City of Costa Mesa
Mike Linares Amend 1-2015
ADDENDUM
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: May 5, 2015
ITEM NUMBER: CC -1 3
SUBJECT: 2014 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG) ALLOCATION
UPDATE
DATE: May 1, 2015
FROM: POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
PRESENTATION LIEUTENANT KEITH DAVIS, EMERGENCY SERVICES MANAGER
BY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT. KEITH DAVIS, POLICE DEPT. EMERGENCY
SERVICES MANAGER (714) 754-5660
UPDATE: FISCAL REVIEW
This update reflects a change in the section relating to Fiscal Review.
The grants funds ($17,800) must be expended in this Fiscal Year as the grant closes June 30, 2015.
Reimbursement documentation will be presented to the County at close of grant period.
PH -2 ADDITIONAL DOCS
M ENA, JESSICA
From: Scott Maples
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 8:28 AM
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Support of Planning Application PA -14-19
Attachments: Support Victoria,pdf
To whom it may concern,
Please find my attached letter in support of the residential project on Victoria Street (Planning Application PA -
14 -19).
Thank you,
Scott Maples
Via Email
May 1, 2015
Mayor Mensinger
City Council Members
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Dr.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
RE: Victoria Project
Dear Mayor Mensinger & Members of the City Council,
1 am writing this letter to urge for your support of the project on Victoria. I am a current resident of
Newport Beach and have been drawn to Costa Mesa with its recent growth and urban
developments. I am currently shopping for a home in Costa Mesa and I believe this new
development is good for so many reasons and we need new homes like these to keep Costa Mesa
desirable.
The city of Costa Mesa is a diverse, unique and desirable place to live. A project such as the one
being proposed is sure to improve Costa Mesa and continue the ongoing redevelopment of old,
underutilized and blighted buildings. It will also provide me the opportunity to buy a home in Costa
Mesa. I am in full support of this project and thank you in advance for approving this project
Thank you,
Scott Maples
PH -2 ADDITIONAL DOCS
MEJIA, JESSICA
From:
LEE, MEL
Sent:
Friday, May 01, 2015 11:21 AM
To:
GREEN, BRENDA; MEDIA, JESSICA
Cc:
Eric Nelson; Holm, Thomas; ARMSTRONG, GARY
Subject:
FW: NO MORE High Density.
From: Marcie [mailto:
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 11:19 AM
To: LEE, MEL
Subject: NO MORE High Density.
Dear City council and those voted in to serve Costa Mesa.
Our concern isn't just about the proposed project At 1239 Victoria BLVD but it concerns future residential projects allowed in Costa
Mesa.
Please JUST imagine YOURSELF living in homes that back up to this property with 3 story units and roof top decks looming over your
back yard. Ask yourself is this is what residents in single family homes want to live next to. The answer is probably going to be NO.
Unfortunately city council is not asking those whom this affects most and that is wrong!
While we listened to the comments of people at the last City planning meeting. MOST said no to such projects. oh sure, a small
handful of proponents were implying they can only afford these Condo like homes. (Some of them I'm sure work for trumark)
Anyway, we find it ironic that these dwellings are NOT what one would call affordable homes. Unless you consider 700 K and
up "Affordable" then that argument is a joke!
About the over lay issue. It is manipulative to ask for a rezoning of that space and then ask for so many variances. Why would the
city have zoning restrictions if they are so easily overturned?
Traffic is already a big issue in many areas of Costa Mesa and yet you want to roll out the "Welcome mat" for even MORE
residence by allowing all these high density dwellings.
A VERY important comment we have to make is the POOR notice our city gives during the planning stages of these projects. WE
are on Gleneagles, an area directly impacted by that abomination WEST Reef. YET, we were not notified by the city about it first-
hand. We found out after the darn thing was approved. THAT is NOT right. Anyone living
within at least 1 mile of that structure along Victoria had a right to know about it BEFORE it was approved!
It disappointed us that some on the city planning committee were giving themselves a pat on the back about West Reef. Adding
comments' about how it has "Increased property value" IT has NOT raised the property value of the homes it looms over! Thanks to
city council approval, some of our fellow neighbors now have these ugly huge 3 story structures stacked up against their
homes. Just go see for yourself. This is NOTHING to be proud of!
Another point we would like to make is the Governor has mandated some very strict cut backs on water usage in our state. In
LA County, my Aunt can only water her plants once per week and if she goes over a certain amount of water usage she gets a VERY
steep fine! We are aware Costa Mesa has their own supply of water now, but with overpopulation this could be our reality.
We are losing our space, our sky our privacy and the traffic is getting worse around here and yet you keep allowing these types of
projects. We as home owners should have a say in what goes directly in OUR neighborhood.
Thank you for your time and THINK about this.
Sincerely Costa Mesa home owners
Tim and Marcie
PS. We are very upset that the City council meeting concerning 1239 Victoria has been moved from June 15Y to May 5th. This must be
very convenient for the developers. Judging by the actions of this council, it is theirwishes that seem to matter most.
PH -2 ADDITIONAL DOCS
MEDIA, JESSICA
From: Libby Wickland
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 10:50 AM
To: CITY CLERK
Subject: Planning Application PA -14-19 - 1239 Victoria Project
Dear Mayor Mensinger & Members of the City Council,
As a longtime resident of Costa Mesa and homeowner at the neighboring Sea Bluffs community I was pleased
to hear about the project on Victoria St. I am sending this letter to express my support for the project. This
project as well as the Westreef project have been great for this area. The city of Costa Mesa is a diverse, unique
and desirable place to live. A project such as the one being proposed is sure to continue to help improve
westside Costa Mesa. Thank you in advance for approving this project.
Thank you,
LI BEY WICKLAND
PROVINCE WEST
PH -2 ADDITIONAL DOCS
Via Email
May 4, 2015
Mayor Mensinger
City Council Members
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Dr.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
RE: Victoria Project
Dear Mayor Mensinger & Members of the City Council,
I am writing this letter to urge for your support of the project on
Victoria. As a resident of Costa Mesa (My wife and I purchased our
first home here last year) I fully support this project and hope more
of these are built. New development is good for so many reasons and we
need new homes Like these to keep Costa Mesa desirable. We currently
live in a town home and love the low maintenance benefit of these
types of projects.
The city of Costa Mesa is a diverse, unique and desirable place to
live. A project such as the one being proposed is sure to improve
Costa Mesa and continue the ongoing redevelopment of old,
underutilized and blighted buildings. It will also provide the same
opportunity to buy a home in Costa Mesa that I had. I am in full
support of this project and thank you in advance for approving this
project.
Thank you
C.J. Eckman
PH -2 ADDITIONAL DOCS
Via Email
May 1, 2015
Mayor Mensinger
City Council Members
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Dr.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
RE: 1239 Victoria Project
Dear Mayor Mensinger & Members of the City Council,
I was pleased to hear that this City Council is potentially approving another residential project on Victoria
at the next city council meeting. As a new homeowner in Costa Mesa I first want to thank the Mayor and
Council as well as those who were responsible for approving the development that I live in. As the owner
of a brand new home in Bungalow 7 I couldn't be more thrilled and would have likely purchased in
another city if my home wasn't built.
The city of Costa Mesa is a diverse, unique and desirable place to live. A project such as the one being
proposed is sure to improve west side Costa Mesa and continue the ongoing redevelopment of old,
underutilized and blighted buildings. It will also provide the same opportunity to buy a home in Costa
Mesa.
Thank you in advance for approving this project.
Sincerely,
PH -2 ADDITIONAL DOCS
Via EYnaU C1er*4WCostamesaca.gov
April 30, 2015
Mayor Mensinger
City Council Members
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Dr.
Costa Mesa, CA 82626
RE: 1239 Victoria Project
Dear Mayor Mensinger & Members of the City Council,
I was pleased to hear that this City Council is potentially approving another residential
project on Victoria at the next city council meeting. As a new homeowner in Costa Mesa I
first want to thank the Mayor and Council as well as those who were responsible for
approving the development that I live in. As the owner of a brand new home in Bungalow
7 I couldn't be more thrilled and would have likely purchased in another city if my home
was not approved.
The city of Costa Mesa is a diverse, unique and desirable place to live. A project such as
the one being proposed is sure to improve west side Costa Mesa and continue the ongoing
redevelopment of old, underutilized and blighted buildings. It will also provide the same
opportunity to buy a home in Costa Mesa. I am in full support of this project
Thank you in advance for approving this project.
Barbara Jolliff
PH -2 ADDITIONAL DOCS
6 AVENUE
OF THE ARTS
WY'tJYJH AM HOTEL
May 5, 2015
To: Steven Mensinger, Jim Righeimer, Katrina Foley, Sandra Genis, .and Gary Monahan
From: Paul Sanford
Re: Trumark Residential Development at 1239 Victoria Street council agenda (2)
Dear City Council:
I am unable to attend the council meeting tonight, until later in the evening. As such, I want to express
my support of the west: side residential development notes as being represented in Hearing Item Number 2
tonight.
I am a resident and business person living and working in Costa Mesa. The residential development
being built in Westside Costa Mesa which is adding much needed vitality back in to many of the
challenged, dilapidated, run down, crime infested areas of the west Costa Mesa. As residents and
business people, we cart see how the developments that have been built: out have improved the
neighborhood, added a. safe environment, and eliminated many dated and run down areas. lam in full
support of the urban styles and architectural improvements this neighborhood has provided. I urge the
city council and planning commission to approve this development and carefully consider other high
quality residential developments on the Westside of Costa Mesa. The economic and environmental good
is tremendous.
her questions, please reach out to me.
AVENUE OF THE ARTS WYNDHAM HOTEL.
3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS I COSTA MESA, CA 192676
714- 751-5100 www.AVENUEOFTHEARTSHOTEL.com
PH -2 ADDITIONAL DOCS
From the desk of, JEFFREY J. LEMA Y
1829 Ocean Ct., Costa Mesa, CA 92627
May 5, 2015
Costa Mesa City Council
Attn: Council Members
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, California 92625
Re: City of Costa Mesa Planning Hearing
Trumark Costa Mesa
Dear Council Members:
1 send this letter in support of the City of Costa Mesa's Redevelopment Plan for
the Westside Costa Mesa District and specifically, the proposed Trumark Costa Mesa
housing development.
Unfortunately, the Westside of Costa Mesa in dire need of improvement. Many
of the area businesses have enjoyed years of lova tax basis without ever reinvesting into
their properties. Consequently, this has contributed to conditions that invite crime,
homelessness and brings the down the overall value of Costa Mesa as whole. Projects
such as Trumark are what the City needs to reinvent itself and attract the new generation
of homebuyers.
Those that oppose developments such as Trumark raise traffic and safety as
reasons for their opposition concerned that these types of developments are too dense and
do not provide for enough open space. I respectfully disagree. People want to live in
Costa Mesa and are hungry for environmentally friendly housing alternatives that offer
urban environments that enjoy close proximity to shopping, dining, entertainment and
recreation. Projects such as Trumark offer this. To this end, I recently purchased in Sea
House, an upscale urban development similar to Trumark. The development has greatly
enhanced the area with minimal impact, As a Costa Mesa resident, I see Trumark as a
positive step to further the City's Westside Redevelopment efforts and am in support of
the development.
Very truly yours,
Jeff. may