HomeMy WebLinkAbout26 - CC-11 - Attachment 3 - 7/21/2015ATTACHMENT 3
RESOLUTION NO. PC -15-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF COSTA MESA FINDING THAT THE CITY OF COSTA MESA'S
VACATION OF A STREET AND HIGHWAY EASEMENT WITHIN
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 970 W. 16TH STREET IS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF COSTA MESA 2000
GENERAL PLAN, WILL SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND IS
A PUBLIC BENEFIT
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY RESOLVES
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Costa Mesa City Council adopted the City of Costa Mesa 2000
General Plan on January 22, 2002; and,
WHEREAS, the Government Code of the State of California, Section 65402,
provides in part that a local agency shall not acquire or lease real property nor abandon
or dispose of any real property, nor construct a public building or structure in any county
or city, until the location, purpose, and extent of such activity has been reported upon as
to conformity with the adopted General Plan applicable thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the southeasterly portion of the property at 970 W. 16th Street was
originally dedicated to the City of Costa Mesa as a street and highway easement by
Easement Deed No. 19903 in Book 5086, Page 412 recorded on February 4, 1960 in the
County of Orange Recorders Office; and
WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa proposes to vacate the street and highway
easement within the property limits of 970 W. 16th Street, as shown in Exhibit B; and,
WHEREAS, the street and highway easement being vacated has been found by
the Engineering and Transportation Divisions to not be necessary for any motorist or non -
motorist usage, and as such, the vacation serves the public interest and is a public benefit
as it eliminates any maintenance costs and liabilities imposed on the City associated with
the easement; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
vacation is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under
section 15312 (Class 12), Surplus Government Property Sales, because the portion of
the right-of-way to be vacated is not located on a parcel of land in an area of statewide,
regional, or area wide concern; and,
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2015, the Costa Mesa Planning Commission reviewed
the proposed vacated easement and findings;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record
and the findings contained in Exhibit A, the Planning Commission does hereby find the
proposed vacation of a street and highway easement within the property located at 970 W.
16th Street to be in conformance with the City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan, will serve
the public interest, and is a public benefit.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd da,
Costa Mesa Planning Commission
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, Claire Flynn, Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Costa Mesa,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 15-38 was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City of Costa Mesa Planning Commission held on June 22, 2015, by the
following votes:
AYES: Dickson. Mathews, McCarthy, Sesler
NOES: None
ABSENT: Andranian
ABSTAIN: None
Claire L. Flynn, Secretary
Costa Mesa Planning Commission
EXHIBIT
B
D=gu-u 1 0I
R-15.00 5'
L=23.57
N89'38'52"W
J
1
Ll N89*36'27W 501V
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
77.68
POR77ON OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
VACA77ON
77.87
N-89-38.34-W(R)
N89-38-34"W(R)
84-37
Ll
14'50'07" 1 275.00
71.20
FOOTHaL RAINCK CALUk)Ma YbW FAX (99) 916-M
J.N.
L 0 IT ml 25
L
T -
S. LINE LOT 1111.
N75'29'10-E(R)
N75 29'10"R
— E()
MM 5/1.
PRC
TRC
E. LINE LOT 1112,
MM 5/1,
25
12,437 SQ. FT.
POR. BOOK 5086
PAGE 412 O.R.
LD
o
U3
LOT 1112
z
CURVE TABLE
LINE TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
D=gu-u 1 0I
R-15.00 5'
L=23.57
N89'38'52"W
J
1
Ll N89*36'27W 501V
L2 N89'38'52W 45.01'
L3 ' NOO'l 9'1 7"E 206,38'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
DELTA RADIUS
LENGTH
— - — - — - —
1,V50'07' 300.00
77.68
- — - — ..
14*52'16" 300-00
77.87
16TH STREET
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
DELTA RADIUS
LENGTH
Cl
1,V50'07' 300.00
77.68
C2
14*52'16" 300-00
77.87
C3
1,V52'26" 325.00
84-37
C4
14'50'07" 1 275.00
71.20
CITY OF COSTA MESA
'PROJECT
TITLE
C&V CONSUTWG, INC-
REFERENCE
DATE
SHEET No.
MIL Wmeamm
5/2/15
UM HANKM AM WWAMD
n56 BURBANK FRONE (W) 916-3800
SCALE . .....
FOOTHaL RAINCK CALUk)Ma YbW FAX (99) 916-M
J.N.
a
EXHIBIT A
FINDINGS (APPROVE)
A. The information presented substantially complies with the City of Costa Mesa 2000
General Plan Section 2.6 (Obj.) LU -1 D in that:
Finding: The project complies with the City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan and
meets the purpose and intent to insure consideration of utility system capacities in land
use planning and development processes.
Facts in Support of Findings: In the Land Use Element, it is the City's goal
to ensure consideration of utility system capacities in land use planning and
development processes. The Engineering Division determined there are no
utilities within the proposed vacated street easement and, therefore, a
reservation for utility easement is not required. Additionally, the Engineering
and Transportation Divisions determined the proposed vacated street
easement is not necessary for any motorist and/or non -motorist usage, and
accordingly, the proposed action will not result in any adverse impacts to the
City's transportation network.
B. The information presented substantially complies with the City of Costa Mesa 2000
General Plan Section 2.6 LU -2 in that:
Finding: As described in the Land Use Element, it is the City's goal to create and
maintain an aesthetically pleasing and functional environment and minimize impacts
on existing physical resources.
Facts in Support of Findings: The Engineering and Transportation Divisions
determined the street and highway easement is unnecessary for present or
future public use. The City may be subject to additional maintenance costs
and liabilities associated with having an ownership interest in the subject
easement. Consequently, vacating the unnecessary street and highway
easement serves the public interest and is a public benefit.
C. The street and highway easement vacation is exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act under section 15312 (Class 12), Surplus
Government Property Sales, because the portion of the utility easement to be vacated
is not located on a parcel of land in an area of statewide, regional, or area wide
concern.
I