HomeMy WebLinkAbout26 - NB-1 - General Plan Screening GPS-14-04 - 9/1/2015CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: IVB -1
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN SCREENING GPS -14-04 FOR PROPOSED 28 -UNIT RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT AT 440 FAIR DRIVE
DATE: AUGUST 19, 2015
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION BY: MINOO ASHABI, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MINOO ASHABI, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
(714) 754-5610, minoo.ashabi(a)costamesaca.gov
RECOMMENDATION
Accept or deny General Plan amendment request for processing to amend the land use
designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Planned Development Residential related
to development of a 28 -unit residential development at 440 Fair Drive.
REQUEST
The applicant is proposing a 28 -unit residential development on the site of an existing
office and commercial building located at 440 Fair Drive. If the General Plan Screening is
accepted for processing, the proposal would require approval of the following:
• General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Neighborhood
Commercial (NC) to High Density Residential (HDR);
• Rezone to change the zoning from C1 (Local Business District) to PDR -HD
(Planned Development Residential — High Density); and,
• Master plan for site design and architectural plans.
BACKGROUND
Project Site
The proposed project is a 1.66 -acre site located at 440 Fair Drive with frontage on Fair
Drive and Carnegie Avenue (Attachment 2). A small service station and the Fiat and
Dodge dealership separate the site from Harbor Boulevard on the west side. The site is
also bounded by the dealership on the north and single family residential units on the
east across Carnegie Avenue.
The original application was submitted in May 2014 for development of 32 units. The
applicant considered other options and the proposal was recently revised to 28 units.
Proposed Project
Setting
The project site contains two parcels (APNs 141-421-19 and 141-421-21) is developed
with a two-story office building that contains 13,500 square feet of medical office, 600
square feet of storage and 6,650 square feet of office and retail space. The project site
has a Neighborhood Commercial land use designation that allows for convenience
shopping and service needs of local residents. The current building and the neighboring
dealerships have been in place since 1960s. Residential development would require a
General Plan Amendment and rezoning of the site to high density residential.
Residential Units
The proposed project submitted for screening to the City Council involves a General Plan
amendment to allow a 28 -unit three- and two-story residential development at a density of
17 du/acre. The project includes two residential unit types; eight units of two-story
detached product and 20 units of three-story duplex structures.
The proposed units are an average of 1,786 and 1,811 square feet in area and include a
roof deck and a two -car garage as follows:
Unity type
Unit Number
Total SF
Garage SF
Roof Deck SF
3 -story - 2 bedroom
unit + den
20
1,786 SF
471 SF
330 SF
2 -story — 3 bedroom
unit
8
1,811 SF
404 SF
320 SF
Total
28
Parking /Access
Access to the site is currently from Fair Drive. The proposed development will eliminate
that access and create a new one on Carnegie Avenue; this access is across from low
density residential development. No on -street parking opportunity is available to the
site; parking on both sides of Carnegie Avenue is resident only parking. The proposed
plan provides for a required fire department access on Fair Drive that will be restricted
for emergencies. Based on the current mix of office, medical, retail and service uses
within the 20,750 SF building, it is anticipated that the new proposal will reduce the
number of average daily trips by approximately 484 trips. A full trip generation analysis
including AM and PM peak hours will be required for the general plan amendment.
To comply with the parking standards, the project will require a total of 92 parking
spaces (3 spaces per unit for two-bedroom units and 4 spaces per unit for three-
bedroom units). The applicant is proposing a two -car garage and a carport for the two-
bedroom units and a two -car garage and two open parking spaces in driveways for the
three-bedroom units.
Required Parkin per unit
Provided per unit
Two-bedroom + den
Two -car garage
Two -garage spaces and One open parking
One carport
spaces
Carne ie Avenue
Three-bedroom
Two -car garage
Two -garage spaces and two open parking spaces
Two open parking in driveways
Building Design and Setbacks
The proposed site plan will provide a 16 -foot building setback along Fair Drive and
Carnegie Avenue. The minimum front setback for corner lots is 20 feet on both street
frontages in Planned Development zoning districts and the proposal will be subject to
approval of a minor modification. The site design allows for installation of a perimeter
wall along Fair Drive to enclose the private open spaces for those units and mitigate
any potential noise from Harbor Boulevard. The units along Carnegie Avenue are
designed with a front facing yard that are visible and accessible from that street
frontage. This configuration allows a good interface with the single family residences on
the east side of Carnegie Avenue.
The residential property to the south and east of the project site are two-story and
single story structure. Since the single family residences on east side of the Carnegie
will be mostly impacted by visual effects of the new development, the units along
Carnegie Avenue are designed with two stories and a roof deck. The three-story units
are positioned along the commercial properties and Fair Drive frontage.
The site is currently bounded by a concrete block wall along Carnegie Avenue and
mature Ficus trees (on private property) that will be replaced with other tree species
with less -intrusive root system and landscaping complementing the proposed front
yards and the building designs.
In meetings with the applicant, staff recommended a wider setback along the
commercial properties on the west and north; the proposed site plan provide an
average of 15 feet on the west side and 10 feet along the north abutting the dealership
parking lot. The following is a list of proposed setbacks in comparison with the
development standards of the Planned Development Residential zoning:
Criteria
PDR -HD requirement
Proposed
Perimeter Open Space
20 feet - along Fair Drive and
16 feet
Carne ie Avenue
Open Space
42% inclusive of perimeter
40% at grade
open space
Balconies — 900 SF
Roof Decks — 9,160 SF
Total Proposed — 53.8%
Interior Setbacks
N/A
10 ft. and 16 ft. — north
15 ft. — west
Max. Height
Four stories
Three -stories and a roof deck
44 feet
Minimum lot size
1.0 acre
1.66 acre
Maximum density
20 du/acre
17 du/acre
Distance between
N/A
8.5 -10 ft.
Buildings
dNdl YSIS
General Plan Amendment Screening Criteria
City Council Policy 500-2 sets forth the criteria to evaluate General Plan amendment
requests. Council takes action on whether or not a proposal should be accepted for
processing by using these criteria as guidance. The Policy establishes a procedure for
processing privately initiated General Plan amendments (Attachment 1). The policy also
acknowledges these criteria are only guidelines and City Council may accept an
application which does not meet the criteria if it finds there are overriding reasons to do
so.
A project summary sheet is attached for the screening request. This summary sheet
provides the following information:
• General Plan Land Use Map and Aerial Photograph
• Potential Project Description, Land Use and Traffic Evaluation
• Justification for approval or rejection of application for further processing
Additionally, acceptance of a proposal for screening is not a commitment to approve the
General Plan amendment. This action represents that Council would like to consider the
request for processing, and subsequently explore alternatives prior to making a final
decision on amending the General Plan.
The following includes a list of items that may require additional site planning
considerations:
• Neighboring Commercial Uses - Because this site is abutting commercial
properties and is located across from single family residential properties. The
project needs to be designed to minimize any potential land use and aesthetics
impacts; an initial study and potentially a mitigated negative declaration may be
required for the project. The environmental analysis will also examine existing
noise and circulation conditions and consider mitigation measures to reduce any
potential impacts.
• Common Area Open Space - The project site does not provide any common area
open space; however, since a subdivision will be processed with the development
application, the project will be subject to parkland in lieu fees. The project's overall
open space at ground level is 40 percent (42% required); however, roof decks and
balconies are provided that will raise the overall open space to 53 percent. The
Planned Development Residential open space criteria does not allow for inclusion
of roof decks in the open space calculation; it is a policy decision to allow meeting
this requirement with the proposed roof decks.
• Open Parking Spaces - Even though the project provides the required number of
parking spaces; the proposal does not include any common area open parking. All
parking are provided on driveways and carports.
• Roof Decks — The proposed roof decks are considered private open space and
subject to exterior noise standards. Because of compatibility and noise issues, the
footprint of the roof decks may need to be modified. This will require further studies
that will be evaluated with the environmental analysis for the project.
ALTERNATIVES
In addition to providing general feedback on the proposed project, City Council would
need to take action on the General Plan amendment screening request.
Accept processing of the General Plan Amendment request. This will require
amending the General Plan to allow a high density residential development in
place of an existing two-story office/commercial building.
2. Deny General Plan Amendment request from further processing. If the application
is denied, the property owner will continue to maintain the office/ commercial use.
FISCAL REVIEW
Fiscal review is not required for this item.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has considered the proposal and determined that a General
Plan amendment is necessary in order for the project to proceed as proposed.
CONCLUSION
Staff believes the proposed development meets the goals and intent of the City's General
Plan and regional land use plans in that it provides new housing within proximity to transit
and commercial service. The proposed development will replace a dated office/
commercial building with new for -sale housing ideal for first time homebuyers, in addition
to providing housing opportunities in close proximity to major transportation corridors and
neighborhood service uses.
MINOO ASHABI, AIA
Principal Planner
Attachments: 1. Summary Sheet
2. Council policy 500-2
3. Vicinity Map
4. General Plan Map
5. Zoning Map
6. Submitted plans
cc: Chief Executive Officer
Assistant Chief Executive Officer
Public Services Director
City Attorney
Transportation Services Manager
City Engineer
GARY ARMSTRONG, AICP
Economic and Development Services
Director
City Clerk (9)
Staff (7)
File (2)
Sheldon Development, LLC.
901 Dove Street, Suite 140
Newport Beach, CA 92660