HomeMy WebLinkAbout30 - NB-1 - Proposed General Plan Land Use Alternat. - 10/6/2015CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2015
ITEM NUMBER: IVB -1
SUBJECT: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ALTERNATIVE FOR THE YEAR 2015-2025
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 2015
FROM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT.
PRESENTATION BY: GARY ARMSTRONG, AICP, DEV. SVCS. DIRECTOR
LAURA STETSON, AICP, PRINCIPAL, MIG INCORPORATED
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
RECOMMENDATION
GARY ARMSTRONG (714) 754-5182
Provide the following direction to staff for the Year 2015-2025 General Plan Update for
each item by separate action:
A. For the Proposed General Plan Land Use Alternative, direct staff to include the
following:
1. Residential Incentive Overlay consisting of 40 du/acre along Harbor Boulevard
and Newport Boulevard.
2. Segerstrom Home Ranch at a maximum of 1.2 million square feet, or 0.64 FAR of
office uses on the development site.
3. Sakioka Lot 2 at a maximum density of 80 dwelling units per acre without any
changes to the existing trip budget, maximum 660 units, and any other
development standards as specified in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan.
4. SoBECA Mixed-use Overlay Zone with a site-specific density of 40 dwelling units
per development lot with an overall cap of 20 du/acre in the overall urban plan area.
5. Harbor Mixed -Use Overlay Zone as a new mixed-use planned development area
with a maximum 1.0 FAR and maximum specified residential density.
6. Fairview Development Center property with a new land use designation consisting
of: (a) 0.25 FAR Institutional/Recreational, (b) Minimum 25% open space for
recreational purposes (approximately 28 acres), and (c) Maximum 500 dwelling
units at 15 du/acre (or maximum 25 du/acre) with a density bonus.
7. LA Times Site at a maximum 0.64 FAR for office uses and 0.54 FAR for
retail/commercial uses in a Commercial Center land use designation.
B. For other Alternative
1. Direct staff to study any other Land Use Alternative(s) in addition to the Proposed
General Plan Land Use Alternative specified above.
BACKGROUND
Purpose of Study Session
On September 8, 2015, the City Council and Planning Commission held a joint study
session to consider potential land use alternatives for 2015-2025 General Plan.
The full study session report could be accessed at the following link:
http://www. costamesaca.gov/ftp/council/agenda/2015/2015-09-08SS/Item1.pdf
The purpose of this study session was to obtain input from the Planning Commission and
City Council on proposed General Plan land use changes. After incorporating comments
from the study session, staff is seeking Council direction on a recommended land use
strategy for the General Plan update.
While State Law does not require the City Council to give formal direction on a preferred
land use plan, staff is requesting authorization from Council to proceed with a land use
strategy.
This report identifies a primary General Plan Land Use Alternative and summarizes
comments from the study session. Other potential alternatives, as directed by Council, will
be further analyzed in the City's traffic model and the Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
Brief Summary of Study Session Comments
The following summary represents comments that appear to have interest from two or
more Councilmembers/Commissioners. If there was general interest, these comments
became the basis for the development of the General Plan Land Use Alternative for study
purposes.
Comments which were made by an individual member without reinforcement or follow-up
by another Councilmember/Commissioner are not included in the proposed General Plan
Land Use Alternative. [Attachment 1, Summary of Comments from Study Session]
For example, comments which formed the basis of the Proposed General Plan Land Use
Alternative included the following:
• Home Ranch Site
A higher Floor Area could be supported to attract major users; general support to
increase the FAR to 0.64. No housing to be allowed on this site; however, mix of
commercial and office uses allowed based on the trip budget determined by 0.64
FAR for office uses.
• LA Times Site
This site includes the 24 acres of the LA Times site and the adjacent ballfield
recently acquired by the Tribune. Comments were in support of an increase of
maximum 0.64 FAR for office uses consistent with the allowed intensity for Home
Ranch with no housing units allowed.
• Robinson -Pharma Site
No change to the current land use designation is supported. In general, no new
housing to be allowed north of the 405 Freeway west of South Coast Plaza.
• Sakioka Lot 2
General support to increase the maximum density for residential development to 80
du/acre (instead of 28 du/acre currently allowed) with the current cap on the
maximum number of units (660 units). No change to the FAR.
• Fairview Developmental Center
Allow for 25 percent open space/ parks and recreational uses; no corporate offices
to be included in the land use. Maximum residential units to be no more than 500
units.
• Residential Incentive Overlay Zone on Harbor and Newport Boulevard
Expand the area to the west of the freeway to include a block north of Bay Street
and four blocks east of the freeway between 20t" Street and 19t" Street.
• SoBECA
No change to the proposed land use with a maximum density of 40 du/acre.
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ALTERNATIVE
The final draft of the Land Use Alternative includes only 4 percent of the area of the City and
the majority (96%) is left unchanged. As previously noted, the strategy behind targeted land
use changes is to identify specific areas that allows the City to maximize development
potential such as the vacant land north of Interstate 405, motel nodes and marginal
commercial land uses located along major freeways, Harbor Boulevard, and Newport
Boulevard.
The focus areas for the proposed land use alternatives are based on their individual
development potential and existing land uses, and the boundaries were established based
on proximity to sensitive uses. For each of the focus areas a description of the intent of the
land use district is provided in Attachment 3 - Land Use Descriptions. The focus areas are
further described in a series of maps that include the existing land use, existing General
Plan designations, and proposed alternative designations, along with likely build out
information and trip generation rates for each mapped condition.
Important Note: The Proposed General Plan Alternative will be studied in the Environmental
Impact Report along with any other Alternatives as directed by Council. The identification of
a Proposed General Plan Alternative at this point does not represent a final commitment or
determination by the City Council of the Final General Plan.
A brief summary of the land use changes for each focus area for the Proposed General Plan
Land Use Alternative is provided as follows.
1. Residential Overlay of 40 du/acre along Harbor Boulevard and Newport
Boulevard
The Residential Overlay would create opportunities for residential development at
strategic locations along Harbor Boulevard and Newport Boulevard. This
designation would allow for new -high density residential uses of up to 40 du/acre in
areas where only commercial uses were previously allowed or residential uses were
allowed up to 17 du/acre. Buildings can be up to four stories in height, provided
privacy concerns of established neighborhoods are adequately addressed through
the setbacks of upper stories or other design approaches. The Overlay would also
increase development opportunities on underutilized motel and commercial
properties.
Interest in reducing the proposed density from 40 du/acre to 25 du/acre is indicated
as a secondary alternative.
The proposed map includes two areas; Council direction is needed to specify the
areas to be included in the Residential Incentive Overlay Zone.
• Option 1, includes several blocks on the eastside of the freeway and the
Sandpiper Motel property located at 1967 Newport Boulevard;
• Option 2, includes Option 1 and five additional blocks including a block north
on Bay Street on the west side of freeway and four blocks on the eastside
between 19th and 20th Street.
2. Segerstrom Home Ranch
This alternative would revise the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan development
standards for the 43.57 -acre Segerstrom Home Ranch sub -area, which is located
south of Coast Drive and north of Interstate 405. Currently, the Specific Plan for this
sub -area allows up to 760,000 square feet of office and office -related uses at an
FAR of 0.40.
The new land use will allow up to 0.64 FAR and 1.2M square feet of office use. The
maximum intensity on this site will be based on the trip budget for 0.64 FAR office
development. Parking structures would be encouraged to create opportunities for
plazas and open spaces integral to development. Restrictions would apply to
residential development within 500 feet of Interstate 405, including the use of
buffering, sound walls, landscaping, air filtration systems, and similar measures to
reduce noise and air quality impacts.
The request from the property owner for an additional 300 dwelling units is not
included in the Proposed General Plan Land Use Alternative.
3. Sakioka Lot 2
Consistent with the allowable densities, the recommended Land Use would allow a
maximum residential density of 80 du/acre, or 660 maximum units and an FAR of
1.0. No changes to the maximum allowable trip budget is being proposed. This
designation is intended to encourage moderate -scale mixed-use development that
balances high-density residential and professional office uses. Commercial and
retail uses would also be allowed to support surrounding residential and
professional office uses. Restrictions would apply to residential development within
500 feet of Interstate 405, including the use of buffering, sound walls, landscaping,
air filtration systems, and similar measures to reduce noise and air quality impacts.
The request from the property owner for a 1.5 FAR is not included in the Proposed
General Plan Land Use Alternative.
4. SoBECA
The SoBECA Urban Plan will continue to include a mix of housing and retail/service
commercial businesses, light industrial uses, creative studios, retail campuses, and
entertainment and restaurant uses that attract local residents and visitors.
Permitted development approaches would be mixed-use development that
combines residential and commercial uses, as well as stand-alone uses. This
designation would emphasize commercial uses and would aim to expand the
established innovative, eclectic, and unique uses that demonstrate the importance
of homegrown and incubator -type businesses to the local economy. The integration
of innovative public spaces and "hangout" areas for special events would be highly
encouraged.
The maximum residential density of the Urban Plan is site specific density of 40
dwelling units with an overall cap of 20 du/acre or (784 maximum units). The
maximum building floor -area ratio of 1.25, and a maximum height of four stories or
60 feet is consistent with the existing overlay.
5. Harbor Mixed -Use Overlay Zone
This mixed-use corridor area is intended to promote lot consolidation for marginal
commercial properties and provide a synergy between Harbor Boulevard
commercial corridor and 19th Street focusing on the Triangle as the downtown.
Design standards will need to be incorporated to encourage stepped setback along
Harbor Boulevard and minimize tunnel effect with development of high residential
on both sides.
6. Fairview Development Center
The center provides a unique opportunity for recreational and residential because
of its golf course setting. A new General Plan Land use designation is proposed to
allow:
• 0.25 FAR Institutional/Recreational
• Minimum 25% open space for recreational purposes (approximately
28 acres)
• 15 du/acre, or maximum 25 du/care with a density bonus, for an
overall maximum of 500 units
7. LA Times Site
This site includes the 20 -acre site and the adjacent ballfield site recently acquired by
the Tribune. The combination of parcels add to approximately 24 acres. As directed by
council, Commercial Center land use designation is designated for this site with a
maximum development intensity of 0.64 for office use. A combination of land uses
could be considered as long as the overall trip budget is not exceeded.
Similar to the proposed changes to Home Ranch site allow a maximum 0.64 for office
uses and 0.54 for retail/commercial uses within the Commercial Center land use
designation.
Traffic Modeling of Proposed General Plan Land Use to Date
Please refer to Attachment 4, technical memorandum of the traffic analysis to date. Please
note that this information was provided at the study session and does not include the
Proposed General Plan Land Use Alternative as currently described in this report.
Once a recommended alternative has been identified a comprehensive Traffic Model Run will
be performed. The Traffic Model Run will more accurately calculate anticipated overall traffic
volumes for the City, including the preferred land Use changes, and how those trips will be
distributed around the City. The Traffic Model Run will predict traffic volumes and levels of
service grades for major roadways and intersection throughout the City.
Fiscal Impact Analysis
Please refer to Attachment 5 for the fiscal impact analysis to date.
Preparation of General Plan EIR
The land use plan is a recommendation based on all work with the community and policy
makers that has been completed to date, and this recommendation will receive full public
review through both publication of the draft General Plan Amendments and the EIR.
The EIR, in addition to analyzing the potential environmental effects resulting from the
proposed General Plan Amendments, will examine alternatives to the proposals. While as
required by law, the alternatives analysis will focus on alternatives capable of reducing any
significant environmental effects that the EIR identifies as associated with the draft General
Plan Amendments (and the draft land use plan in particular), staff would like the EIR to
consider any alternatives that the Council directs. This approach will provide for broad
public disclosure of any alternatives that may be considered during the public review
process, once the draft General Plan Amendments and EIR are published.
Other Land Use Alternatives
In addition to the Proposed General Plan Land Use Alternative, Council may direct staff to
further study other alternatives. Based on the feedback given at the study session, there is
interest from a Councilmember to study the following:
1) Study housing north of the 1-405. If there is interest to study residential uses in this
area, Council may direct staff to include the Segerstrom's original request for additional
residential units for Home Ranch Site. The property owner is seeking to include 300
residential units in addition to the 0.64 FAR (1.2M square feet) to allow for a mixed use
development at this site. This alternative will need to be considered in the traffic model
so that any potential impacts to nearby intersections is studied and a new trip
generation cap is established. Council may also provide any other direction as it relates
to other potential residential development sites in this area.
2) Reduce Density of the Residential Incentive Overlay Zone to maximum 20 du/acre with
a density potential of up to 24 du/acre for all residential incentive areas proposed on
Harbor and Newport Boulevard. (The proposed General Plan Alternative specifies the
Residential Incentive Overlay Zone at 40 du/acre.)
CONCLUSION
Staff is seeking formal direction on the Proposed General Plan Land Use Plan and the
potential alternatives. This information will be guiding preparation of the General Plan EIR that
will be available for a 45 -day public review in January 2016. The Proposed General Plan
Alternative will be studied in the Environmental Impact Report along with any other
Alternatives as directed by Council. The identification of a Proposed General Plan Alternative
at this point does not represent a final commitment or determination by the City Council of the
Final General Plan.
GARY ARMSTRONG, AICP
Economic Development &
Development Services Director/ Deputy CEO
Attachments: 1 — Summary of Seatember 8. 2015 Studv Session
2 — Land Use Exhibits
3 — Land Use Descriptions
4 — Technical Memorandum — Vehicle Traffic Forecasts
5 — Technical Memorandum — Fiscal Impact Model Methodolo
6 —Additional Documents
Distribution: CEO
Assistant CEO
City Clerk (2)
City Attorney
Dev. Svcs. Director
Transportation Division Manager
Staff (6)
File (2)