HomeMy WebLinkAbout- - Additional Documents - 11/17/2015PUBLIC COMMENT PRESENTATION
M EJ1A, JESSICA
Subject: FW: 3 Minute Presentation at City Council Meeting -Nov 17, 2015
Attachments: Summer learning lag letter to Mayor.pdf, SSLG costa mesa presentation.pptx
From: Fauzia Ansari
Sent: Monday, Novem er 16, 2015 12:46 PM
To: GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.green@costamesaca.gov>
Cc: Farooq Ansari Feroz Ansari
Subject: 3 Minute Presentation at City Council Meeting -Nov 17, 2015
Dear Ms. Green,
I spoke to one of your colleagues at the City Clerk's office and they informed me that I can make a 3 minute
non -agenda item presentation at the council meeting tomorrow. Please find attached the PowerPoint
presentation and a copy of the letter that I plan to deliver to the Mayor and Council Members.
I will be most grateful if you can arrange the PowerPoint presentation to be projected during my speech. I plan
to arrive at the meeting by 5:30 PM and will bring 10 hard copies. The goal of the presentation is to raise
awareness among our civic leaders about the impact of summer learning lag on children from underprivileged
families.
If you have any questions, please send me an email or call/text at 949-293-6464. I will appreciate if you can
confirm the receipt of this email.
Farooq Ansari
President
Solving the Summer Learning Lag Club at Sage Hill School
http://www.solvingthesunimerleaminggap.com
November 17, 2015
The Mayor & City Council Members
City of Rancho Santa Margarita
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92679
Honorable Mayor Stephen Mensinger & City Council Members,
As elected members of our community, you bear the most direct responsibility to
improve the life of the citizens in our community. My name is Farooq Ansari, and I
am the President of Solving the Summer Learning Gap Club at Sage Hill School in
Newport Beach. Today, on behalf of our club, I will present to you the most
important problem that is impacting the K-12 education system in our community
and our country. The problem is "The Summer Learning Lag" or "The Summer
Slide". Summer learning lag refers to the loss of learning that takes place in
underprivileged families and the long-term impact of summer on their children.
The inspiration for founding this club came from reading the works of Malcolm
Gladwell. He is one of the most influential and powerful thinkers, journalists and
thought leaders on a variety of issues, including education. In his books, he
emphasizes the academic achievement gap between children of low socioeconomic
backgrounds and their peers from wealthier families. Through various research
endeavors and analysis of scientific studies, Gladwell and now a host of researchers
have concluded that there is a definite link between this achievement gap and what
happens during the summer.
So, what exactly is the summer learning gap? This term refers to how children from
low socioeconomic backgrounds fall behind academically during the summer, while
their middle- and upper-class peers continue to advance during the vacation. In fact,
summer learning loss accounts for 2/3 of the achievement gap by ninth grade.
Studies reveal that children from both wealthy and poor families progress at the
same rate academically during the school year, but the main discrepancy in
performance occurs during the summer. In fact, the child from a wealthier family
gains at least 2 months in math and reading during the summer, while the student
with fewer resources loses about 1 month. By the time both these students reach 5tn
grade, the gap has stretched to 2 to 3 years, and it continues to widen into high
school; essentially, the summer learning gap traps poorer children in an everlasting
cycle of academic underperformance, and they can never regain that lost ground.
As leaders of our community, you have the power to bring about change. You have
the ability to influence and implement policy measures that will close this gap. We
at SSLG request you to consider the following ideas:
• Declare that your city has active programs to reduce summer learning lag
• Provide financial assistance to children from underprivileged families to enroll in
academic summer programs
• Advocate school districts to develop and implement academic summer programs
for underprivileged children
• Encourage institutions that can deliver quality summer educational programs to
underprivileged children
We are also enclosing a brief presentation that provides more detail about this
critical problem. We would also like to request a meeting with you and your staff to
discuss ideas on how to close this gap. You can contact us at
18ansarifCa)sagehillschool or
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Farooq Ansari (President)
Members of Solving the Summer Lag Club
httl2:/Zwww.solvingthesummerlearninggal2.com
Enclosure:
Summer learning lag presentation
Solving the Summer Learning Gap
(SSLG) Club
Presentation to:
The Mayor & City Council Members
City of Costa Mesa
Presentation By: Farooq Ansari
Founder of SSLG at Sage Hill School
://www.solvingthesummerlearninggap.com
What is the "Summer Learning Gap?"
• The summer learning gap, or
slide, refers to children with
fewer resources falling behind in
academics during the summer,
while their middle- and upper-
class peers continue to advance
during the vacation
Ln
0
U
C
(,
E
v
(U
s
u
4
From Different Income Groups
Middle-class students
Disadvantaged students
Regular School Year
Summer Vacation
Regular School Year
Cooper et at, conducted a meta-analysis, which is a review and synthesis of multiple research
studies. They reviewed 93 evaluations of summer school programs serving grades K through 12,
and also reviewed qualitative data from the program evaluations, including interviews with
teachers, parents, and administrators.
Summer Learning Lass
66^
of the academic achievement gap between
disadvantaged students and their higher -income
peers in 811, grade can be traced to unequal
access to summer learning
opportu n ities.
Reading Achievement, Middle - Inorime Studen
Reading Achievement, Disadvanlaged Student
Sia, : NaUwaf Sumrnec LeaI&M ASSOGaI MC
[it
Middle- Inoo me S-tidents Gain
Aeadonic- Skills it the Summer
Months
Disadvantaged Students Lose
Academic Skips in the Summer
How can YOU help beat the
"Summer Learning Gap"?
• Declare that Cosat Mesa will have active programs
to reduce summer learning lag
• Provide financial assistance to children from
underprivileged families to enroll in academic
summer programs
• Advocate school districts to develop and
implement academic summer programs for
underprivileged children
• Encourage institutions in Costa Mesa that can
deliver quality summer educational programs to
underprivileged children
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CC -3
WARRANT
INFORMATION
Payment
Date
Remittance to:
Remittance
Payment
Explanation of payment
Ref.
ID:
Amount
0192606
10/30/15
Kato Landscaping
0000021744
$3,704.76
(Restoration) - What
Inc.
location is this for?
This was one-time work
to repair the damaged
electrical supply to an
irrigation controller on
the landscaped median
on Adams Ave. just
west of Fairview Rd.
0192687
11/06/15
Athletic Field
0000023215
$4,650.00
What did we spray?
Specialists
(Spraying services)
This was the application
•f pre -emergent
herbicide to the hybrid
Bermuda sports turf at
Jack Hammett Soccer
Complex and Te Winkle
Athletic Complex.
0192724
11/06/15
General Data
0000023334
$1,039.28
What printers got
Company
repair? Should we have
purchased new ones?
The invoice was for
three printers:
PD -CSI: pickup rollers
Engineering: plotter
drive belt replaced
R: pickup rollers
Operations will work
with the departments to
assess the printers for
replacement if
necessary.
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CC -7
MEJIA, JESSICA
Subject: FW: Item CC -7 RESIDENT ONLY PARKING PERMIT.
From:
Sent: Plonclay, Novemuer 1b, ZU15 /Ai FM
To: CITY COUNCIL <CITYCOUNCIL@d.costa-mesa.ca.us>
Subject: Item CC -7 RESIDENT ONLY PARKING PERMIT.
Honorable Mayor and City Council,
I am in support of City Council approving Item#CC-7 on November 17th 2015, Request for
Resident Only Permit Parking on Murray Lane, Fernheath Lane, Donnybrook Lane, Warren
Lane, Royce Lane, Killybrook Lane, between Baker Street and Watson Avenue.
This is a very serious issue to me. 1 had planned on attending and speaking at the
council meeting, unfortunately it appears I will be unable to attend or speak. Please
read my below statement.
I am a 42 year resident of Costa Mesa and home owner at 3024 Warren Lane with
three young children. I have watched the parking problems get worse and worse
over the past several years. At the same time, I have watched the amount of
residents in the "Multi family" Apartments on Baker Street increase and multiply to
over capacity. I have personally witnessed and have seen several garages/parking
areas being used as living spaces in the Baker Street Apartments. On several
occasions, I have seen the designated apartment parking spaces empty and unused
while the surrounding streets and neighborhood is filled with vehicles that should
be in those spaces. It is my belief that the number of families that live and vehicles
that drive in the Baker Street Apartments, far exceeds what they were originally
approved and designed to hold.
Many evenings, late nights, and entire weekends the vehicle traffic, lack of parking,
general noise level, foot traffic, that is all caused by our current parking problem is
unbelievable.This goes on at all hours of the day and night, every day of the
week. Many vehicles stay parked for multiple days, some routinely stay from Friday
evening until Monday morning. Some of those vehicles include beat -up trucks full
of gardening equipment, taxi cabs, and other commercial vehicles. Some nights car
alarms will go off over and over because the vehicle owner lives in the Baker Street
Apartments and can't hear it. More times than not, it is not even possible to park in
front of or near my own home. Guests to my home are forced to park several
houses away, if they get lucky.
With the heavy amount of vehicles and strangers on our streets, it tends to leave an
unsafe feeling among my neighbors and 1. We clean up trash and alcohol
bottles/cans left by these same vehicles on a regular basis. We have also
experienced several items being stolen from our and other neighbors front and side
yards. Occasionally we even find people sleeping or doing drugs in
vehicles. Resident Only Parking Permits would solve all these problems.
Our quality of life and the quality of our neighborhood has changed for the worse.
am asking that you approve the Request for Resident Only Permit Parking
for Murray Lane, Fernheath Lane, Donnybrook Lane, Warren Lane, Royce Lane, Killybrook
Lane, between Baker Street and Watson Avenue.
There are many reasons why such a overwhelming majority of our neighbors and streets have
come together. We are all experiencing similar situations as stated above. We need the City of
Costa Mesa's help to clean up our neighborhood.
Sincerely,
AWN"
Costa Mesa CA 92626
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CC -7
MEJIA, JESSICA
Subject: FW: November 17th Meeting - Agenda Public Comment
Attachments: Nov 10 Tues 12AM on Fernheath Lane jpg; Nov 10 Tues 12AM on Fernheath Lane 2 jpg;
Nov 10 Tues 12AM on Fernheath Lane 3jpg; Nov 12 Thurs 6PM on Fernheath Lane
1 jpg; Nov 12 Thurs 6PM on Fernheath Lane 2 jpg; Nov 12 Thurs 6PM on Fernheath
Lane 3 jpg
From: Jen H [mailto:hern.jen@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:42 PM
To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us>
Subject: November 17th Meeting - Agenda Public Comment
Hello,
There was a last minute change to my schedule and I will not be able to attend tomorrow's meeting but was
interested in commenting on item 47 on the agenda: REQUEST FOR A "RESIDENT ONLY" PARKING
RESTRICTION ON MURRAY LANE, FERNHEATH LANE, DONNYBROOK LANE, WARREN LANE,
ROYCE LANE, AND KILLYBROOKE LANE BETWEEN BAKER STREET AND WATSON AVENUE.
I live on Baker St in one of the multi -family units. The limited street parking on Baker St. is almost always
filled to the max and parking is only allowed on one side of the street. As a single women it will be very hard
for me to walk several blocks or not able to find near by parking at night. I've only lived in the area for a few
months but I have never seen a parking problem for the streets mentioned in the agenda item. I driven the
mentioned streets in the evenings and even late night and parking has never been an issue and there always
seemed to be plenty of open spaces. In contrast, Baker St very rarely has open street parking spaces.
I've attached photos that I was able to capture that show the lack of parking issues that I've seen.
I do not live on the mentioned streets but I am still a local resident and unless we are given an alternative for
parking that will be a safe distance from our dwellings I do not think that making "resident only" parking is the
answer. I've lived in beach cities and in areas with true parking issues but the mentioned streets always seem to
have plenty of available parking and they do not truly have need to restrict parking.
I attached a few pictures to reference and hopefully this comment makes it into the meeting tomorrow.
Thank you!
Regards,
Jennifer Hernandez
562-338-4925
Fr
. i iii 7 • ••
F .w
V.
y,a
. o
1#
14
►i
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CC -7
M EJIA, JESSICA
Subject: FW: Parking proposal Royce Lane
Attachments. imageljpeg; ATT00001.txt; image2 jpeg; ATT00002.txt; image3 jpeg; ATT00003.txt;
image4 jpeg; ATT00004.txt; image5 jpeg; ATT00005.txt; image6 jpeg; ATT00006.txt
_____Original Message -----
From: Dan Wales [mailto:
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:15 AM
To: SETHURAMAN, RAJA <RAJA.SETH URAMAN@costamesaca.gov>
Subject: Parking proposal Royce lane
Dear Mr Sethuraman,
I am writing to object in the strongest terms to the proposal for permit parking requirement on Royce
Lane, Costa Mesa.
I have lived on this street for over ten years and own several houses on Royce lane. There is
absolutely no bases for parking regulation on our street and l submit these pictures as proof:
� _ .a, . 4i�., ♦ l�. 1 r.
'• s �yj•{4! tlC' tli•
u
r
r f { �I gti �•. n
Paw
ffir
1,
!
L
I 1
t
y
M
� _ .a, . 4i�., ♦ l�. 1 r.
'• s �yj•{4! tlC' tli•
u
r
r f { �I gti �•. n
Paw
ffir
ry � •
t .y .•" 1' �i• .. �tr.
•1. - M�� �.l1 �•� 1SP, �.
111 r .` �,; 1 1 r
XbIXt
..fir
F
4�
ry � •
t .y .•" 1' �i• .. �tr.
•1. - M�� �.l1 �•� 1SP, �.
111 r .` �,; 1 1 r
XbIXt
..fir
F
I";
M Ii
\
0
owl
T
MMML��
F
N
� t h
♦
5
J
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CC -7
Me oranduw
To: Mayor and City Council, City of Costa Mesa
From: Sharon Gates Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Date: November 17, 2015
Re: Request for a "Resident Only" parking restriction on Murray Lane, Fernheath Lane,
Donnybrook Lane, Warren Lane, Royce Lane, and Killybrooke Lane between Baker
Street and Watson Avenue.
I am writing in support of Item #7 on tonight's Council agenda. I have lived in Costa
Mesa for approximately 20 years, and on Warren Lane for almost 10 years. Because of
the large number of non-resident vehicles that are parked on my street, I and my
neighbors are often unable to park near our own homes. We are subjected to car
alarms, radios, loud conversations, and the incessant beeping of horns as drivers lock
and unlock their vehicles.
With drivers having to park their cars far from their homes, they can't hear when their
car alarm goes off during the night. My family has called the police on a number of
occasions when a car alarm has been going off in front of our house for 20 minutes or
more in the middle of the night and no one has come by to turn it off.
As Warren Lane provides access to the part of the neighborhood north of Watson
Avenue, it carries a substantial amount of traffic, especially when people are going to
and from work. Most mornings when I leave for work, there is at least one large vehicle
parked in front of my house, blocking my view as I leave my driveway. This makes it
more dangerous for me to pull out of my driveway.
For these and many other reasons, I strongly support implementation of "Resident Only"
parking restrictions in my neighborhood. I look forward to a quieter and safer
neighborhood when people from outside our neighborhood are no longer clogging our
streets with their parked vehicles.
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CC -7
MEDIA, JESSICA
Subject: FW: Parking Permits
Attachments: 20131216_075849 cropped compressed jpg; 20131216_075901 cropped
compressed jpg; 20131216_080754 rotated compressed jpg
Halecrest resident Jay Murata will not be able to attend the meeting tonight, but would like to have his
original email and pictures forwarded to the City Council for consideration.
Elizabeth Palacio
Engineering Technician
Ph. (714) 754-5634
-----Original Message -----
From: Jay Murata [mailto
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 10:51 AM
To: 'CHO, DAVID'
Cc: 'raja.sethuraman@costamesaca.gov'; 'doug.johnson@costamesaca.gov'; 'cmprepared';
'jtorres@costamesaca.gov'
Subject: RE: Parking Permits
David,
The insufficient parking at the apartments along Baker between Fairview and Harbor causes the
apartment residents to park in the Halecrest neighborhood.
As a Halecrest resident for over 43 years the parking problem is reaching an all time high. Today,
one car was actually parked under my car and partially blocking our driveway and another car was a
few inches from the front bumper and parked on the curve. I couldn't move without someone's
vehicle being damaged. This is unacceptable and unsafe. Please see the attached pictures.
If you look at the pictures you can notice the green CRV was parked under the spare tire of our
Hummer and partially hanging over the driveway. Worse yet, the driver of the CRV ran across Baker
with her 3 children. I don't know if crossing the street at Baker and Murray is legal but it certainly isn't
smart especially with children. One day a fatal accident will happen if apartment residents continue to
park in the Halecrest neighborhood and dash across Baker.
I called the police this morning to check out the cars from the apartments blocking my vehicle,
unfortunately the officer was unable to respond before the vehicles left.
My neighbors and I would like to apply for residential parking permits.
Does the city have official forms that you can send me? If you do that would be a great help.
Thank you,
Jay Murata
Original Message-----
From: CHO, DAVID [mailto:DAVID.CHO@costamesaca.gov]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 9:55 AM
To: 'Jay Murata'
Subject: RE: Parking Permits
Mr. Murata: you would need to submit a formal request in writing to our Transportation Manager.
Raja Sethuraman
Transportation Services Manager
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa CA 92626
Basically, a petition is required with majority support from residents and staff would need to document
that there is significant parking intrusion unrelated to the neighborhood. I have attached the permit
parking guidelines for your reference. Note that if resident -only permit is approved for a street, it is in
effect at all times.
Thank you,
David Cho
Assistant Engineer
Transportation Services Division
City of Costa Mesa
phone: 714.754.5017
fax: 714.754.5028
email: david.cho@costamesaca.gov
-----Original Message -----
From: Jay Murata [mailto
Sent: Thursday, December ,
To: CHO, DAVID
Subject: Parking Permits
Hello,
Could you please tell me how the residents on our street can obtain parking permits?
Thank you,
Jay Murata
ti
104
w�
4
4
.�tl
I
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS OB -1
PUBLIC 1LAW CENTER
PROVIDING ACCESS TO JUSTICE
FOR ORANGE COUNTY'S LOW INCOME RESIDENTS
November 17, 2015
Mayor Steven Messinger
Costa Mesa City Council
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Re: Objection to Second Reading of Ordinance No. 15-14 for Rezone No. R-14-04 and
Ordinance No. 15-15 for Code Amendment No. Co -14-02 — 2277 Harbor Boulevard — Motor Inn
November 17, 2015 City Council Agenda, Old Business Item No. 1
Dear Mayor Steven Messinger and Councilmembers :
Public Law Center strongly objects to the redevelopment of the Costa Mesa Motor Inn
into luxury apartments without affordable housing, as it violates state Density Bonus Law and
the City of Costa Mesa's current Housing Element. The proposed project will detrimentally
displace the low-income residents of the Costa Mesa Motor Inn.
First, we write to reiterate that approving the redevelopment of the Costa Mesa Motor
Inn into a luxury apartment building at 54 units per acre is contrary to the state Density Bonus
Law. Currently, the City appears poised to approve spot zoning for several motel parcels from
General Commercial to 40 units/acre High Density Residential. However, it appears that the City
also intends to approve changing 2277 Harbor Blvd. to only 20 units per acre, as of the time of
approval of the development. In addition to that density, Miracle Mile Properties has requested a
"development incentive" that would allow a site-specific density of 54 units/acre, as well as a
site-specific height for a parking structure. Granting that bonus would contravene state law.
The City Council Agenda Report for Item Number PH -1 on November 3, 2015, states:
"Per the applicant's request, the proposed base density is 166 units (40 du/acre) with a
development incentive for an additional 58 dwelling units to be justified by (a) provision
of 20 affordable units for moderate -income households; and (b) complete demolition of
the Costa Mesa Motor Inn."
Both the City and Miracle Mile Properties suggest that the request for an increase in
density of the proposed project is not a density bonus, but rather a "development incentive."
However, state law defines a density bonus as "a density increase over the otherwise maximum
allowable residential density as of the date of application by the applicant to the city, county, or
city and county." Cal. Gov't Code § 65915(f). As of the date of application for the proposed
601 Civic Center Drive West - Santa Ana, CA 92701-4002 - (714) 541-1010 - Fax (714) 541-5157
project, the parcel was zoned as General Commercial. City Council Agenda Report, Item PH -1 at
1 (November 3, 2015). Assuming that the City passes the targeted spot zoning of motel parcels,
Miracle Mile Properties would still be requesting an increase in density over the new base
density of 40 units/acre (which would be adopted after the date of application). Whatever the
applicant or the city calls it, a request for an increase is for a density bonus, as defined in the
Density Bonus Law.
"The state density bonus law is a powerful tool for enabling developers to include very-
low-, low- and moderate -income housing units in their new developments .... The purpose of
this law is to encourage municipalities to offer incentives to housing developers that will
`contribute significantly to the economic feasibility of lower income housing in proposed
housing developments.' (§ 65917.)" Wollmer v. City of Berkeley, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1329, 1339
(2011). Government Code 65917 states that"[i]n the absence of an agreement by a developer in
accordance with Section 65915, a locality shall not offer a density bonus or any other incentive
that would undermine the intent of this chapter." In order to qualify for a density bonus in a
rental -only property, units must be set aside for very -low- or low-income families, or seniors -
only, which this proposal does not purport to do. Gov't. Code 65915(b)(1). Miracle Mile
Properties is proposing zero units in those categories. Instead, it proposes twenty moderate -
income rental units, which do not qualify for a bonus. By granting an increase in density above
the maximum allowable without requiring units affordable to low- and very -low-income persons,
the City is eliminating any incentive for a developer to build affordable units, wholly
undermining the intent of the Density Bonus Law.
Second, the proposed redevelopment of the Costa Mesa Motor Inn into luxury apartments
is in conflict with the City of Costa Mesa's Housing Element. Zoning ordinances are invalid
unless they are consistent with the General Plan. California Government Code § 65860; Lesher
Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek, 52 Cal. 3d 531, 541 (1990). Under state law, the
City's General Plan, specifically the Housing Element, must plan for housing that meets the
needs of all economic segments of the community. Cal. Govt. Code § 65860(d). The Housing
Element must identify and analyze "existing and projected housing needs," and state goals,
policies, quantified objectives and programs "for the preservation, improvement and
development of housing." § 65583(a)(1). All subsequent land use decisions, including the
adoption and amendment of zoning ordinances, must be consistent with the General Plan and its
elements, including the Housing Element. §§65583(b)(2), (c)(3).
Here the redevelopment of the Costa Mesa Motor Inn conflicts with its current Housing
Element. One, the City lists the Density Bonus Program as a program to offer density bonus
incentives for projects that will reserve a portion of the units as housing affordable to very -low-,
low-, and moderate -income housings, consistent with State law. Housing Element Costa Mesa,
2013-2021, adopted 2013, pp. 41. To qualify for Costa Mesa's Density Bonus Program, which
includes density bonus and concessions or other incentives, "the developer of a proposed housing
project of at least five units must provide housing units affordable to very low, low or moderate
income household...." Id. Aizain moderate income housing would not qualify as affordable
housing if the development is a rental property_Gov't. Code 65915(b)(1).
Two, the City lists a goal to preserve and expand affordable housing opportunities.
Housing Element, pp. HOU 64-65. The City, in GOAL HOU-2, committed to promoting "the
601 Civic Center Drive West - Santa Ana, CA 92701-4002 - (714) 541-1010 - Fax (714) 541-5157
use of State density bonus provisions to encourage the development of affordable housing for
lower. .. income households." Housing Element, pp. HOU-65. The City also promised to
"continue to pursue funding, partner with nonprofits and provide incentives (such as density
bonus and deferred impact fees) to developers that agree to reserve a portion of the project units
for lower income households (including extremely low income)...." Housing Element, pp.
HOU-68. The City is violating its own Density Bonus Program as it is providing incentives to
the developers of CMMI, yet are not requiring the developer to reserve any portion of the units
for very -low- or low-income households. The City clearly is not meeting its goals and
commitment to promoting the State density bonus provision.
To make matters worse, the application states that it will demolish the Costa Mesa
Motor Inn in its entirety in exchange for the density bonus, while acknowledging that there are
currently at least 49 households occupied by long-term residents. If Costa Mesa provides a
density bonus to Miracle Mile Properties for the redevelopment of 2277 Harbor Boulevard, it
must replace every unit occupied by low- and very -low-income families to ensure no net loss in
affordable units. In 2014, when long-term occupants were forced to register with the City, there
were 63 units with long-term occupants. The majority, if not all, of these long-term occupants
have low incomes or less. Government Code 65915(c)(3) states that an applicant is ineligible for
a density bonus or other incentive "if the housing development is proposed on any property that
includes a parcel ... on which rental dwelling units are or, if the dwelling units have been
vacated or demolished in the five-year period preceding the application, have been ... occupied
by lower or very low income households, unless the proposed housing development replaces
those units." In addition to replacing those units, the developer must still provide affordable units
at the percentages required by the Density Bonus Law in order to ensure no net loss of affordable
units. Id.
Costa Mesa has long acknowledged that low- and very -low-income families reside at
the Costa Mesa Motor Inn. If the City grants Miracle Mile Properties a density of 54 units per
acre, it will be displacing residents and reducing the affordable housing available in Costa Mesa.
That is prohibited by the Density Bonus Law and its own Housing Element.
This City Council has an obligation to Costa Mesa to require that developers reserve
units as affordable housing units because its residents will be affected by the granting of density
bonuses and incentives. The City will be impacted by the increase in dwelling units per acre and
the City should make sure that it can take care of its low-income residents in exchange for that
impact. The proposed project violates state Density Bonus Law and Costa Mesa's current
Housing Element, and we therefore urge you to vote against the proposed redevelopment of the
Costa Mesa Motor Inn.
Sincerely,
VLQ tjjK-�
1�w Lili Graham
Richard Walker
Attorneys for Tim Dadey
601 Civic Center Drive West • Santa Ana, CA 92701-4002 - (714) 541-1010 - Fax (714) 541-5157
November 17, 2015
Mayor Stephen Mensinger and City Council Members
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS OB -1
www.kennedycoinmission.org
17701 Cowan Ave- Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
949 250 0909
Fax 949 263 0647
RE: General Plan Amendment/ Rezone/ Zoning Code Amendment and Master Plan for
Costa Mesa Apartments at 2277 Harbor Boulevard Project
Dear Mayor Mensinger and City Council Members:
The Kennedy Commission (the Commission) is a broad based coalition of residents and
community organizations that advocates for the production of homes affordable for families
earning less than $20,000 annually in Orange County. Formed in 2001, the Commission has been
successful in partnering and working with jurisdictions in Orange County to create effective
policies that has led to the new construction of homes affordable to lower income working
families.
The Commission is resubmitting this letter in support of the Costa Mesa Affordable Housing
Coalition's letter dated November 3, 2015 in opposition to the General Plan Amendment/
Rezone/ Zoning Code Amendment and Master Plan for Costa Mesa Apartments at 2277 Harbor
Boulevard Project. The Costa Mesa Motor Inn (CMMI) provides last resort affordable housing
for many lower income households and the CMMI will displace many at -risk families and lead
them to homelessness. The Commission urges the City to consider the following:
1. Incorporate and implement the recommendations outlined in the Costa Mesa Affordable
Housing Coalition's letter dated October 10, 2015.
2. Allow a General Plan Amendment (to change land use designation from General
Commercial to High Density Residential), Rezone (to change zoning classification from
Cl (Local Business District) to PDR -HD (Planned Development Residential -- High
Density)) and Zoning Code Amendment (to amend the Costa Mesa Municipal code to
include the proposed development's site specific height of 60 feet and site-specific
density of 54 du/ac in the PDR -HD zone) ONLY 1F at least 20 percent of the proposed
development is affordable to lower income working households. By increasing the
existing base density, the City is effectively circumventing the use of a density bonus
(SB 1818) for proposed projects, which would have facilitated the development of
new affordable homes for lower income households in the City.
3. Provide replacement housing that is readily available and affordable in the City for
tenants, especially for all the long-term occupants. While the proposed development is a
private development, the proposed development is seeking for development incentives
Mayor Mensinger and City Council Members
November 17, 2015
Page 2 of 2
(i.e., General Plan Amendment, Zoning Code Amendment and rezone) that developers
were previously not entitled to. These development incentives should be considered as a
form of a public subsidy. The development incentives that the City is approving and
giving away to the developer has significant value to it that should be quantified and be
accounted for. Because the developer is utilizing a public subsidy, the relocation
assistance should be re-evaluated and replacement housing for displaced tenants at the
CMMI should be provided.
4. Do not approve the second reading of this proposed development and continue
the item for further discussion. The Kennedy Commission is very concerned
that inore information on the relocation plan need to be provided and we
want to ensure the best interests for the tenants, who will be significantly
impacted from this proposed development are prioritized.
The proposed relocation plan, especially the additional $200,000, for the tenants and long
term occupants at the Costa Mesa Motor Inn has not been vetted or discussed in depth
with the current tenants and the community. There are many pertinent questions that have
not been addressed such as:
What are the details of the additional $200,000 relocation program? What is
the cost break down of the $200,000 (i.e. how much of the $200,000 will go
directly be set aside for the tenants and how much for administrative costs
etc.)? When does the program commence and how/where can tenants start
accessing this resource? Who and when will the tenants be informed of this
program and the relocation plan (3 month rent and additional $1,500 cash)?
The Commission looks forward to working in partnership with the City to create and implement
effective policies and programs that will incentivize the development of homes affordable to
lower income working families. Please keep us updated on the City's responses to the Costa
Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition's recommendations and on any updates regarding the
CMMI.
If you have any questions, please free to contact Cesar Covarrubias at (949) 250-0909 or
cesarc@kennedycommission.org.
Sincerely,
Cesar Covarru ias
Executive Director
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS - OB -2
MEDIA, JESSICA
Subject: FW: pending ordinance... sober living and multi family, condos
Attachments: Jeffrey - council meeting speaker on topic11122015_00000.pdf; Jeffrey -sober living Nov
2015 articie11092015_00000.pdf
From: Suzanne R
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 5:23 PM
To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE @costamesaca. ov>
Subject: pending ordinance... sober living and multi family, condos
was in earlier today, but you had a meeting set up with 2 gentlemen so I did not get to see you.
I am an owner of 2 triplexes in Costa Mesa CA 92626 (3011 Jeffrey Dr and 3014 Jeffrey Dr, 92626).
It has come to my attention that 3016 and 301.8 Jeffrey Drive have recently changed hands, and given existing
tenants notice
to move, since it is there intent to operate 'alternative living' homes (sober living homes???)
I am very concerned with this. #1. 1 have tenants with children who are themselves very, very concerned
about this.
#2. My adult sons (both in their thirties), also live in the property, and I am concerned for their safety and well
being as well as that of all of my tenants. #3. 1 am concerned how this will have a negative impact on the
value of my property and on the rent of my property as well. #4. This is my retirement income, so this is not a
frivolous concern.
I have read a recent article regarding a 'pending ordinance' to address the sober living homes and condos and
multi -family dwellings.
I feel that this is an assault on affordable housing. My tenants are nice, hard working people. To have sober
living homes is an attack on a quiet, safe neighborhood. Additionally. these 2 properties share a common
driveway for ingress & egress. They are definitely in closer proximity than current code allows for with single
family homes (& is proposed for multi -family and condos).
It is my understanding that under current ordinances, a permit is not required for operators of sober living if
the property is a multi -family or condo. Is that correct?
It is my understanding that it is the intent to begin operations as a sober living facility in Jan 2016 (just around
the corner, but prior to that business plan being implemented. I want to address this right away, to potentially
prevent the implementation of these sober living homes, it that is a possibility.
1. 1 am attaching a public comment form. I intend to attend next Tuesdays council meeting. (if I am unable to
attend, I hope that my adult son, John -Paul Richmond can attend. I was advised by the city clerk's office that
although the meeting started at 5:45, if I was there by 6:45 pm, I could participate in the public comment part
of the meeting. It is also my intent for this email to itself be part of a public comment record. My boyfriend,
John Bolan, also owns a property on Jeffrey Dr. (3037) and he also feels the same on this potential
neighborhood development (he has potentially stronger feelings and concerns and understands past problems
with sober living facilities, which also includes dangerous drug users).
2. 1 have also attached a copy of a newspaper article which addresses this issue.
3. 1 put a call into code enforcement last Friday a.m. (November 4
Thank you,
SUZANNE RICHMOND
aryzr� wRtxat�T
g rF�d ami,°�ta4i st et,cum`ar
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS OB -2
Did you know?
Costa Mesa is home to 83 licensed rehab/sober living businesses.
That's one for every 1,351 persons.
The city of Newport Beach has 19 licensed rehab/sober living businesses.
That's one for every 4,593 persons.
The city of Santa Ana has 34 licensed rehab/sober living businesses.
That's o_nefor__every 9,830 persons.
The city of Huntington Beach has 19 licensed rehab/sober living businesses.
That's _one for -every 10,399 persons.
The city of Irvine has 4 licensed rehab/sober living businesses.
That's one for every 57,929_ persons.
What is going on in Costa Mesa?
0
rn
C
O y
U d
o
0 L
V LL
N
CL
ry N
C
U .L
J '0
lL
:C
U
0
O
O
r
M
N
O
w
000000000000000000000000000000000
00
CO
N
N
r
M
O
N
h
M
CO
h
V
(O
h
r
N
Cl
h
V
r
N
h
h
CO
OD
M
f0
W
(O
N
M
(O
Ch
O
N
1
N
1
O
It
r
r
w
0
N
V
N
N
r
N
r
M
M
r
r
r
r.
0
r
N
r
O
N
0
0
000
000
0
0
0
C?
V
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
r
lb
(O
r
(p
rr
M
MI,-
(p
M
r
V
h
h
M
h
M
h
h
M
M
M
V
O
M
0
0
0
0
0
N
r(O
r
N
(O
M
h
(O
r
O
O)
N
(O
V
h
to
Cl)
co
co
O
co
h
z
(O
O
O
N
(0
M
V
O
M
M
V
(O
W
(O
M
M
(O
m
N
N
N
N
(O
(O
h�
(O
h
O
N
(O
C')M
N
(O
h
N
r
O
O
V
(O
M
(O
O
m
M
M
(O
(O
N
M
M
O
coV
in
LO
(O
M
M
O
r
V
M
MM
or
M
M
(
M
VO'
V
'Md'
VM'
M
M
M
V
Cl)
O
N
O
N
M
O
7M
h
h
(O
N
h
r
M
N
M
N
M
m(O
h
(O
(O
(O
O
N
N
M
(O
N
N
N
(O
(O
V
(O
I'-
QW
m
(O
O
N
I�
LO
N
N
2
(O
N
r
(O
M
O
r
7
r
CO
LO
O
CO
M
N
OD
O
O
N
W
M
M
h
N
(O
(O
M
M
(O
(O
(O
M
M
I`-
M
O
r
N
r
O
W
M
(O
O
M
M
m
0
(O
'IT
a0
O
co
N
0
CO
(O
(O
V
ti
r
W
h
(O
r
V
M
O7
O
r
0
M
O
hl
to
In,
N
h.
V
h
LO
r.
N
CO
M
V) CO
M
r
M
CO
CO
M
h
V
M
M
V
(O
CO
h
M
M
V'
N(0
r
P'
(p000,
(O
N
M
(O
r
N
(O
r
(p
h
N
N
r
N
r
N
N
r
r
r
V
M
r
0
0
0
C)
0
O
i
m
V
N
N
U
N
N:
U
N
N
N
O
OOO
m
O
O)
N
N
OL
cG'
E
O
CO
2
.L
C
C
O
f6
Z
.Or
N
N
(�
CO
C
N
C
C
.�+
U
N
P-
a
C)
m
ltl
C$
C
..�+
C
'.CG
C
Q
C
N
=
N
l6
w
in
O
O
U
N
-OO
L
C
U
f0
l0
-2
a
Q.
m
C
C
M
E
m
7
m
O)
C
Y
O
N
O.
W
C_
�.
f0
N
C
(51-9
m
N
Z
J
.">
O
LOL
(/i
=
J
13
(L
J
J
(n
J
m
U
Q
a
(�
Q
m
a`
J)
}
J
0
O
O
r
M
N
O
w
Cjy�. .4 1 m v rr
O
ell
0 P s
rn yes s
a�b C Q y
an m
W �Ov C
Q Q 7R j
N_ Z
Q LL W O 4O
r
W
f0 S Main St
CO V
C d
CO
L S Flower St
W
St 3
a � m O �
r
ro
a a joWepueg o
v c
ou 01 E
f N v �' $ os a� m
4
3 N
\ 3
3
PAJU iorp�
N O U
'm CL
CN
S Euclid St Euclid St Cudid Sr O��f _m
0 Z
No
Al Y a
r �t St w r` �S 1sia
Z a' 0 > m y90
LL ¢' 9
ushard St � a' o
w Y
;t � W Magnolia St
w�m m
!A i a Newland St = �
O Jl r
V 0 O O o A
L
yGothard St s9en C
=03
w Edwards St Edwards St T �'
>O 0 Springdale St =
m LL47,v
o _ a w
m
3 w xv a'
O
CO
\ L
tU
O
lT
■ � C
N J
■ � N O1
m Q n
.c W
LL d= U !_
4
a
O_U
U C
CO lL
R2/R2 Sober Living Ordinance
Mark -Green Core
Mon 11/2/2015 2:43 PM
Inbox
To:stephen.mensinger@costamesaca.gov <stephen.mensinger@costamesaca.gov>;jim, rig heimer@costamesaca.gov
<jim.righeimer@costamesaca.gov>; sandra.genis@costamesaca.gov <sandra.genis@costamesaca.gov>;
gary.monahan@costamesaca.gov <gary.monahan@costamesaca.gov>; katrina.foley@costamesaca.gov
<katrina.foley@costamesaca.gov>; brenda.green@costamesaca.gov <brenda.green@costamesaca.gov>;
citycouncil@costamesaca.gov <citycouncil@costamesaca.gov>;
City Council of Costa Mesa
Please get this done right,
the first time. Spend the
money to do this right. It
will be well spent. There
has to be city PAC's that are
successfully creating livable
guidelines to support the
backbones of our city. If
there is not, then start one
so that we don't always end
up being the low spot and
you know what we mean.
These "Hotels" are of a
completely different culture
than the neighborhoods
they've moved into. They're
not city licensed nor taxed
based on revenues. Good
folks are moving. I myself
am selling at a reduced
value!!! These R2 places
are generating way north of
$350,000/ MONTH at the
expense of the neighbors
and our city coffers. That's
just the start, our fed and
insurance dollars are
funding these ventures, but
that's another story for
another time. These folks
don't rare. We've had the
city Code enforcement and
CMPD numerous times, the
state etc. We have spread
sheets of incidents with and
with out city department
history numbers. When
meeting with their "C Suite"
staff who are not
much more than
graduates of their own
system, when mentioned
during such a meeting that
the CMPD was just out the
night before for exactly what
they've said over and over
is fixed, or that you have
Audio & Video recordings,
they simply ramble on as
though they didn't even hear
you. After a couple of
years, we finally suggested
they put up signs for their
hotel patients to be
considerate of neighbors -
they thought that was a
good idea - HELLO - you
know they had to have
thought of that many
projects before. They're
arrogant owners! It's
smoking, choking,
coughing, belching, loud
chatter, cell phone speaker
phones, Doors SLAMMING
at all hours, their
supervisors in and out of the
next doorunits 24/7 all
through the night. We can't
raise a family here In our
opinion, Our City isn't
turning into a waste land - it
already is.
We're the only city in the
county that still allows the
purchase of fireworks - and
then of course why leave
the dump to blow them off
when no rules are
enforced. We've gained a
real reputation across the
country over the last several
years and none of them
seem to be topics we'd want
to be associated with.
These facilities are simply
money printing machines.
Their websites are complete
marketing tools promoting -
the luxury living, the yachts,
the electric boats etc.
Seldom discussing their
protocols for recovery or
rehab. Never any claims of
recidivism rates.
It's a different culture. Most
have been checked out of a
normal society, they have
no idea what they're doing
or the effect what they do is
having.
We seek your guidance and
commitment to fulfill what is
in the best interest of
our "permanent" and/or
owner residents.
Sober Living regulation
Ari Henning
Wed 11/4/2015 7:50 AM
Inbox
To:katrina.foley@costamesaca.gov <katrina.foley@costamesaca.gov>;
Hello Councilwoman Foley,
I'm writing you to express concern about the rapid influx of sober living facilities in Costa Mesa
I fully believe in the importance of such facilities, but they must be held to certain standards in order to protect the very vulnerable
clients they are meant to serve and to insure our neighborhoods are not eroded.
Sober living facilities need to be regulated and held to business and ethics standards
The first time I became aware of sober living homes was about a year years ago, when my brother nearly died of a heroine
overdose and decided to get clean. After he'd spent a month in a detox facility I began researching options for his recovery and
discovered sober living.
In calling around to several dozen SE facilities I learned that they are not all run for the benefit of addicts. I spent countless hours
on the phone vetting facilities before we found one that wasn't clearly full of crooks. Many of these businesses are just
that—businesses seeking a profit. Most of the facilities we called insisted that my brother have a certain health insurance plan, and
that if we got him on that plan they would take him free of charge and even pay his insurance premium and give him a living
stipend. I later found out that this crooked (though seemingly generous) offer is because the sober living facilities milk the
insurance company for up to $1500 a day for "treatment." Surely this practice is illegal. None of the dozen or so facilities I spoke
with actually wanted us to pay cash for his treatment—they all insisted on him having the exact same insurance plan so they could
rake in the cash.
Running a sober living home is hugely profitable, which is why so much property is being bought up for that purpose. Thankfully
the facility we found was run by an ex -addict who genuinely cared about helping people recover their lives. Unfortunately such
facilities seem to be few and far between, with most of them just looking to make huge profits off of overfilled apartments.
Sober/iving facilities are degrading the quality of our neighborhoods and disrupting communities
Soon after my brother transitioned out of sober living, my wife and I were evicted from the tri-plex where we had been living for
nearly two years. We were asked to leave at no fault of our own because the property was sold to a sober -living developer.
Moving was hugely stressful, but it was worse for our neighbors who had just had their second child.
However, we were ready to leave since the neighborhood had taken a nosedive. Just a few months prior the building next to us on
the same lot was sold and became sober living, and the quality of the neighborhood immediately began to degrade. Parking
became a nightmare due to overcrowding and the constant turnover and there were often groups of people outside smoking on
the curb late into the night. The quiet, close-knit community that we loved was lost.
Please, use your power on the City Council to create an ordinance that will protect recovering addicts and protect our
neighborhoods.
Thank you.
An Henning
TBON Sober Living/Rehab Home Map November 2015
��N� S.ye lomC neer .
1 Ih 4ns
— rOfle 51 i, I fi t J' 1 m n
Q �r
C' O'•� C
at $ aYn v 1
c` `s T a inya, a x
XS.�IWAnTl
JMn Wayrc airportVang.d lub on
'knon4r Un vers
fluWrctl flE 915pV1
' r�lm camor a`
�` bRl Mewpon alaMy
. .. � ,�♦s a� cdl co„rw p`
fi
WpYe Forxsr PO 6
Q Y aF
♦ Cnm]rPZ�Sf � � n
Q
W 1�1 M1�
Ipark Cc�,��M
vwe�ay�{�O"'
! o �
go-gle
SJ•
Blue points are homes licensed by the state of California.
Red points are homes reported by the community.
EO
i
:Sa
I%
f
New Donald Dungan
i Library, NCC, & Park
Improvements
� Project at Lions Park
City Council Mee
November 17,
Tammy Leto
A
OverNk -.-A
1W
January 20, 2105 Award of Professional Services
Agreement to Johnson Favaro
Architect completed Phase I- Preliminary Design
The study included 3 phases:
Review and assessment of existing conditions
,0- ..
I
Library and Community Meeting Center programming
and option development
Final recommendation and cost estimates
City Council Study Session 111715- Donald Dungan Library & NCC Project 2
r. I AOW�A'O-
1
Improve library services and create quality programming
and event space.
Increase facility use for both the library and community
center.
Improve outdoor space associated with all facilities at
Lions Park.
Create a space that promotes education, community,
and civic engagement.
A k.
r
City Council Study Session 1 1_17_15- Donald Dungan Library & NCC Project 3
Phase krreF77nary Design
Architect completed:
A 6 month Feasibility Study
Assessed the surrounding open space in proximity to the facilities
Completed stakeholder process
3 Community Outreach Meetings
Individual meetings:
OCPL staff
City Department staff (Public Svcs., PD, Fire, and Bldg. & Safety)
CM Library Foundation & Friends of the Library
NCC User Groups (NMUSD, Yellowstone, Pat Allen Seminars,
American Cetacean, and OC Soccer Referee Association) Y
Completed preliminary project cost estimates
Prepared proposed concept plans
City Council Study Session 11 _17_15- Donald Dungan Library & NCC Project 4
'resentations
Presentation of work completed in Phase I of the Library
and NCC Project by the architect Steve Johnson, Johnson
Favaro
Fiscal Review presented by interim Finance Director
Stephen Dunivent
Provide recommendations and obtain input and direction
from the City Council
r
®m smmr-
__ ._ __.M1. t
City Council Study Session 111715- Donald Dungan Library & NCC Project
5
Approve the option to build new library building; renovate
existing Donald Dungan library facility to serve as the new NCC;
demolition of the NCC; and proposed parking and landscape
developments in two (2) phases.
Review and approve in concept funding option 3 including Fire
Station 1 and direct staff to return with an update on funding
options during the FYI 5-16 mid -year budget report.
Enter into a professional services agreement with Johnson
Favaro for architectural services for the new Donald Dungan
Library & NCC, and Park Improvements Project (City Project No.
800015) at Lions Park.
City Council Study Session 111715- Donald Dungan Library & NCC Project 6
Donald Dungan Library Feasibility Study
Costa Mesa, CA
city c
ZI
ouncil Meeting
November 17, 2015
1
Tonight
• Pre -Design Study Recommendation .......................................... . . . ..Steve
• Library needs and building program ...................................................... Linda
• Options, Cost and Next Steps ....................................................... Steve
2
Recommendation
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
IMP LI
ND IMP
LI N P
A- Ji
C M M NI- T'
LI N P
40�11� MI.&
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Three Projects 4
D
101
U.
RECREATION CENTER
i
AftL
1
C,� LI#�� J� i���� I1 � i i;;�IIIi1i1111n!■■111■ • *■■■ �
*• * •�
.COSTA hIESA
%AL
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
• C L N IN ..
.AN"
,E.
LI N P
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Three Projects 6
U.
Ods'+ om
RECREATION CENTER
i
1
•
I
I� f
11 r
PARK FIRE STAnpry I
j
d.l�s - •IN
.COSTA hIESA
%AL
I
I� f
11 r
PARK FIRE STAnpry I
j
d.l�s - •IN
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI
NI
LI N P
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
SOWED
- f�-
Three Projects 8
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI
NI
I N
SOWED
- f�-
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Three Projects 9
LI
N
P
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Three Projects 9
NCC
D N N Ll
■
AftL adha
PARK FRE STATION
PMKAVr
0
0
�l
m
D
N
N
C
I
NC
N
D N N Ll
■
AftL adha
PARK FRE STATION
PMKAVr
0
0
�l
m
D N LDD N NLI NDN I
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Recommendation
111
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
�1�11�111�
■r 411
L '"I
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Recommendation 12
p
N
Ll
C N
M
A
.:i
ANAHEIMAVE-
------ ------
Ar -
PARK FIRE STATQN
L -1-
PARXA%IP
I : I.- i I -
ANAMEWAVE-
p
N C N COWWOM
ni;RcAT19N CENTER
Ll
•11''--
H
L Lo
El
ANAHEIMAVE-
------ ------
r7
OOSIAMMAmSTORICK
.SG,-IEV
--D
P c
P ND
N
IMP M N
ANAMEWAVE-
D L'
N C N
LI
M
N
P IN
P C
n';RcrATION CUUM
El
ANAHEIMAVE-
------ ------
r7
r AMMAmSTORICK
. D'-IEV
l7w�ll r—
PARXA%IP
P c
P ND
N
IMP M N
P
N C N
LI
M
N
P IN
P C
n';RcrATION CUUM
El
ANAHEIMAVE-
------ ------
r7
r AMMAmSTORICK
. D'-IEV
l7w�ll r—
PARXA%IP
P c
P ND
N
IMP M N
N m
ANAMEWAVE-
I 'MW. AVE
s
-
cowwcwN
n,;RcrATTQN CENTER
-Y
A
1-1
ANAHEIMAVE
Fl, 17
H I :
001j7TAMMA. mSTORICK
SG,-IEV L
--D
L
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C MPL I N P
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Recommendation 17
�I
fII.�
i
PARK AVE
-1_
D N N
JI M IN
N
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
I
M
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C MPL I N
A
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Recommendation 19
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C MPL I N P
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Recommendation 20
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
I IN
P P D
Completed in 4-1 /2 years
$34.5M
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Recommendation 21
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
mm
LI
C MM NI
IN C N
• DD D C DDI I N
P P N P C
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P P D
Completed in 4-1 /2 years
$34.5M
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Recommendation 22
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
• CPL I C MMI
IN N
D
LI
• M IN P C I P
IN LI ND
M IN C N
ID D
N
• P I M D M y
P N, C ND
P P D
Completed in 4-1 /2 years
$34.5M
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Recommendation 23
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI N P
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Recommendation 24
Overview
25
LI ND C MM NI M
IN P C
I ILI
D C D L
M c
M P IL M N
I € ND f IN
C NDI I N
P IL
Cl C NCIL
LI C M NI C N €P
IMAMMIN D
L
P A N D L PM N P P IN L L N
C D L N C MM ND N
C MM NI M IN C MM NI M IN C MM NI M IN
M M c
P N ,
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
Lions park
• Vehicular circulation and parking
• Pedestrian circulation
• Service and emergency vehicle
access and circulation
• Un programmed open space
• Ground plane permeability
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
Lif
C PI L I N Existing park 30
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
Lions park
• Vehicular circulation and parking
• Pedestrian circulation
• Service and emergency vehicle
access and circulation
• Un programmed open space
• Ground plane permeability
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
EXISTING LIONS PARK: 10 Acres
C PI L I N Existing park 31
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
Lions park
• Vehicular circulation and parking
• Pedestrian circulation
• Service and emergency vehicle
access and circulation
• Un programmed open space
• Ground plane permeability
EXISTING LIONS PARK: 295 Parking Spaces
C PI L I N Existing park 32
•l a go oY.
Lo
C MM NI C N
IC CC
C I NC N
IC ND I
CC
I
0 0 0 0 ;■
4F
7 -
..
!
■
9
6
LI
IC
CC
CC
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
Lions park
• Vehicular circulation and parking
• Pedestrian circulation
• Service and emergency vehicle
access and circulation
• Un programmed open space
• Ground plane permeability,
EXISTING LIONS PARK: Un programmed open space @ 2.8 acres
C PI L I N Existing park 34
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
Lions park
• Vehicular circulation and parking
• Pedestrian circulation
• Service and emergency vehi....,
access and circulation
• Un programmed open space
• Ground plane permeability
EXISTING LIONS PARK: Permeable ground plane @ 60 %
C PI L I N Existing park 35
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
Lions park
• Vehicular circulation and parking
• Pedestrian circulation
• Service and emergency vehicle
access and circulation
• Un programmed open space
• Ground plane permeability
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
Lif
C PI L I N Existing park 36
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
NCC
• Roof membrane and diaphragm
• Exterior doors and windows
Mechanical equipment and some
electrical panels
• All lighting fixtures/controls to comply
with CA T-24
• AV/IT technology systems
• Water drainage system
• Kitchen and grease trap
y
C PI L I N
PFA
v
4r
Existing facilities 37
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
NCC
• Roof membrane and diaphragm
• Exterior doors and windows
• Mechanical equipment and some
electrical panels
• All lighting fixtures/controls to comply
with CA T-24
• AWIT technology systems
• Water drainage system
• Kitchen and grease trap
I
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C NDI I N I IN ILDIN
C PI L I N Existing facilities 38
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
NCC
• Roof membrane and diaphragm
• Exterior doors and windows
• Mechanical equipment and some
electrical panels
• All lighting fixtures/controls to comply
with CA T-24
• AWIT technology systems
• Water drainage system
• Kitchen and grease trap
I
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C NDI I N I IN ILDIN
C PI L I N Existing facilities 39
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
NCC
• Roof membrane and diaphragm
• Exterior doors and windows
• Mechanical equipment and some
electrical panels
• All lighting fixtures/controls to comply
with CA T-24
• AWT technology systems
• Water drainage system
• Kitchen and grease trap
I
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C NDI I N I IN ILDIN
C PI L I N Existing facilities 40
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
NCC
• Roof membrane and diaphragm
• Exterior doors and windows
• Mechanical equipment and some
electrical panels
• All lighting fixtures/controls to comply
with CA T-24
• AWIT technology systems
• Water drainage system
• Kitchen and grease trap
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P C NDI I N I IN ILDIN
C PI L I N Existing facilities 41
D N LDD N NLI NDN I
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
Dungan Library
• Structural seismic resisting lateral
bracing systems
• Exterior doors and windows
• Accessibility (ADA) requirements
• Mechanical systems
• Plumbing systems
• Electrical panels
• Lighting fixtures and controls to comply
with CA T-24
y
r -
c PI L I N Existing facilities 42
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
11ingan
� 'brary
• Structural seismic resisting lateral
bracing systems
• Exterior doors and windows
• Accessibility (ADA) requirements
• Mechanical systems
• Plumbing systems
• Electrical panels
• Lighting fixtures and controls to comply
with CA T-24
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P C NDI I N I IN ILDIN
C PI L I N Existing facilities 43
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
Dungan Library
• Structural seismic resisting lateral
bracing systems
• Exterior doors and windows
• Accessibility (ADA) requirements
• Mechanical systems
• Plumbing systems
• Electrical panels
• Lighting fixtures and controls to comply
with CA T-24
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P C NDI I N I IN ILDIN
C PI L I N Existing facilities 44
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
Dungan Library
• Structural seismic resisting lateral
bracing systems
• Exterior doors and windows
• Accessibility (ADA) requirements
• Mechanical systems
• Plumbing systems
• Electrical panels
• Lighting fixtures and controls to comply
with CA T-24
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P C NDI I N I IN ILDIN
C PI L I N Existing facilities 45
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
Is there a "Zero Cost"
Option?
• Infrastructure and cosmetic improvements of
any kind with a value of $150,000 or more
will trigger ADA and Structural upgrades to
comply with current code
• $3.5 M in Mechanical, Electrical and
Lighting upgrades alone for both buildings
• $500K in Roofing, Roof diaphragm, roof
structure improvements for both buildings
• ADA code compliance upgrades total $575K
• $550K for New exterior glazing and doors
• $300K Kitchen Renovation
C
C PI L I N
D IN N IN
Existing facilities 46
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
Is there a "Zero Cost"
Option?
• Infrastructure and cosmetic improvements of
any kind with a value of $150,000 or more
will trigger ADA and Structural upgrades to
comply with current code
• $3.5 M in Mechanical, Electrical and
Lighting upgrades alone for both buildings
• $500K in Roofing, Roof diaphragm, roof
structure improvements for both buildings
• ADA code compliance upgrades total $575K
• $550K for New exterior glazing and doors
• $300K Kitchen Renovation
C
C PI L I N
D IN N IN
Existing facilities 47
AhIN rAh
I.
Z KOARKIS
REPAIRING NCC AND DUNGAN LIBRARY
1
DUNGAN LIBRARY
New HVAC Equipment and ductwork $435,000
Structural framing improvements necessary to support new rooftop mechanical
$26,800
eq u pmerrt and new roofi rig ate ui p merit area
New lighting and comroIs, new electrical panels switch gear including tire alarm
systems and security $610,000
New exterior glazing and doors
$184,100
Accessibility upgrades to include reconfiguration of restrooms $225,000
New carpet $80,000
Cast before Mark-ups $1,560,900
Contingency 12.00% $187,308
General Requirements 2.00% $34,964
General Conditions 7.00"/ $124,822
Bonds & Insurance 2.00% $38,160
Contractor's Overhead, Profit & Fee 3.50% $68,115
Escalation to Midpoint Nov 2017 11.44% $230,432
TOTAL
$2,244,702
2 NCC
Roof membrane and Roof diaphragm -pair $450,000
New exterior glazing and doors $335,000
New HVAC eg ui ment and ductwork $900,000
Structural framing improvements necessary to support new rooftop mechanical
equipment $35,000
New lighting and controls, new electrical panels switch gear including fire alarm
systems and security $1,300,000
Remodel catering kitchen and replace eg u pment $200,000
Re air domestic p Iumbiri g system $120,000
New carpet $170,000
Accessi b I l ity u pgrades $300,000
Cost before Mark-ups $3,810,000
Contingency 12.00% $457,200
General Requirements 2.00% $85,344
General Conditions 7.00% $304,678
Bonds & Insurancel 2.00%1 $93,144
Contractor's Overhead, Profit & Feel 3.50%1 $166,263
Escalation to Mid point (Nov 2017)1 11.44'41 $562,452
TOTAL
$5,479,092
TOTALI
$7,723,794
AhIN rAh
I.
Z KOARKIS
REPAIRING NCC AND DUNGAN LIBRARY
1
DUNGAN LIBRARY
New HVAC Equipment and ductwork
$435,000
Structural framing improvements necessary to support new rooftop mechanical
$26,800
eq u pmerrt and new roofi rig ate ui p merit area
New lighting and comroIs, new electrical panels switch gear including
tire alarm
systems and security
$610,000
New exterior glazing and doors
$184,100
Accessibility upgrades to include reconfiguration of restrooms
$225,000
New carpet
$80,000
Cast before Mark-ups
$1,560,900
Contingency
12.00%
$187,308
General Requirements
2.00%
$34,964
General Conditions
7.00"/
$124,822
Bonds & Insurance
2.00%
$38,160
Contract
$68,115
ESW latl
$230,432
TOTAL
$2,244,702
2 NCC
Roof membrane and Roof dia hra
$450,000
New exterior glazingand doors
$335,000
New HVAC aqui ment and ductwor
$900,000
Structural framing improvements necessary to support new rooftop
mechanical
equipment
$35,000
New lighting and controls, new electrical panels switch gear including fire alarm
$1,300,000
systems and security
Remodel catering kitchen and replace eg u pment
$200,000
Re air domestic p Iumbiri g system
$120,000
New carpet
$170,000
Accessi b I l ity u pgrades
$300,000
Cost before Mark-ups
$3,810,000
Contingency
12.00%
$457,200
General Requirements
2.00%
$85,344
General Conditions
7.00%
$304,678
Bonds & Insurance
2.00%
$93,144
Contractor's Overhead, Profit & Fee
3.50%
$166,263
Escalation to Mid point (Nov 2017)
11.44'41
$562,452
TOTAL
$5,479,092
TOTAL
$7,723,794
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
NCC Utility
• City keeps detailed records (rented, non -
rented and city meeting use)
• City can precisely match meeting space
with renter need.
• NCC utilized at 30%
• City maintains at 100%
• Other, better meeting space available city
wide
• Use of NCC will continue to decrease
unless it becomes more competitive
M IN ND N
C PI L I N Existing facilities 50
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
NC e-% IJtility
• City keeps detailed records (rented, non -
rented and city meeting use)
• City can precisely match meeting space
with renter need.
• NCC utilized at 30%
• City maintains at 100%
• Other, better meeting space available city
wide
• Use of NCC will continue to decrease
unless it becomes more competitive
I
C PI L I N
IN ND N
Existing facilities 51
Costa Mesa Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
16
24%
Qui MIL N
°°'°
Quir
4
5%
M
5
5%
Bani
16
24%
Ever M
0
0%
Cory
vents
12
17%
New
5
8%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recrui
8
11%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
7
11%
Testing
Baker Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Qui MIL N
°°'°
Quincenearas
0
0%
D M M
5
5%
Ban
0
0%
Eve
M
0
0%
Corr
17
94%
New vents
0
0%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR
1
6%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
0%
Testing
18
Hamilton Room
9ofEvents
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Qui MIL N
°°'°
Bano M
Eve
6
4%
D M M
5
5%
n=====vents
122
75%
Newport -Mesa Unified School
0
0%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recruit
34
21%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
0%
Testing
162
.tea
Adams Room
#of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
4
4%
Quincenearas
0
0%
D M M
5
5%
vents its
26
29%
vents
24
28%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR nt
27
30%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
4
4%
Testing Irk
MI
Victoria Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Quincenearas
0
0%
I C I
12
7%
M is
128
75%
vents
16
10%
City Meetings, Trainings, ent
14
8%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
0%
Testing
170
Capri 8r Dakota Room of Events %
0 0%
Q C P I ND 0 0%
B D 0 0%
E
C M 8 28%
N vents °
City Meetings, Trainings, HR t 21 72%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitmen 0 0%
Testing
29
Costa Mesa Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
16
24%
Qui MIL N
0
°°'°
Quir
4
5%
M
5
5%
Bani
16
24%
Ever
M
0
0%
Corr vents
12
17%
New -
5
8%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recruw
a
11%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
7
11%
Testing
Baker Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Qui MIL N
0
°°'°
Quincenearas
0
0%
D M M
5
5%
Ban
0
0%
Eve
M
0
0%
Corr
17
94%
New vents
0
0%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR
1
6%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
0%
Testing
im
Hamilton Room
9 o Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Qui MIL N
0
°°'°
Bano M
Eve
6
4%
D M M
5
5%
n======vents
122
75%Newport-Mesa
Unified School
0
0%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recruit
34
21%
Testing, Programs, Classes
0
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
0%
Testing
162
.tea
Adams Room
#of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
4
4%
Q C P I ND
0
0%
Quinoenearas
0
0%
D M M
5
5%
vents its
26
29%
vents
24
28%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR nt
27
30%
Testing, Programs, Classes
0
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
4
4%
Testing
Victoria Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Q C P I ND
0
0%
Quinoenearas
0
0%
I C I
12
7%
M is
128
75%
vents
16
10%
City Meetings, Trainings, ent
14
8%
Testing, Programs, Classes
0
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
0%
Testing
170
Capri & Dakota Room
*of Events
%
0
0%
Q C P I ND
0
0%
B D
0
0%
E
M
C
8
28%
vents
N
0
City Meetings, Trainings, HR t
21
72%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recru en
0
0%
Testing
29
Costa Mesa Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
16
24%
Quir MIL N
°
°°'°
Quir
d
5%
M
5
5%
Ban '"'
16
24%
Ever M
0
0%
Corr
vents12
17
17%
New
5
8%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recrui
8
11%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
7
11%
Testing
Baker Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Quir MIL N
°
°°'°
Quincenearas
0
0%
D M M
5
5%
Ban
0
0%
Eve
M
0
0%
Corr
17
94%
New vents
0
0%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR
1
6%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
0%
Testing
im
Hamilton Room
of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Quir MIL N
°
°°'°
Ban M
Eve
6
4%
D M M
5
5%
n======vents
122
75%
Newport -Mesa Unified school
0
0%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recruit
34
21%
Testing, Programs, Classes
0
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
0%
Testing
162
■�■
Adams Room
#of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
4
4%
Q C P I ND
0
0%
Quincenearas
0
0%
D M M
5
5%
vents its
26
29%
vents
24
28%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR nt
27
30%
Testing, Programs, Classes
0
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
4
4%
Testing Ilk
Victoria Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Q C P I ND
0
0%
Quincenearas
0
0%
I C I
12
7%
M is
128
75%
vents
16
10%
City Meetings, Trainings, ent
14
8%
Testing, Programs, Classes
0
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
0%
Testing
170
Capri & Dakota Room
*of Events
%
0
0%
Q C P I ND
0
0%
e D
0
0%
E
M
C
8
28%
vents
N
0
City Meetings, Trainings, HR t
21
72%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitmen
0
0%
Testing
29
IC I M
eats
an uet lecture ormat
\� T",
-
�� 0
'CO)
70
LrF
---------- ), 0 0 0
0
0 -- - MIL N M
eats
an uet lecture ormat
cc vu.np •mMo sP�1CF VGRHOGG CGNNVNITY CENTER NENGYATGN .,....��s.A:�... o.....
ODNALO UVNGAN LIBRARY! NEIGH9-
NCC M IN P C
Victoria Room
of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Quinvenearas
0
0%
Banquets, Fundraisers, & Other special
12
7%
Events (Private Rentals)
Community & Non -Profit Meetings & Events
128
75%
Newport -Mesa Unified school District
16
10%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recruitment
14
8%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HIS Recruitment
0
Oslo
Testing
170
Hamilton Room
# of Events
%
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
0
0%
Quincenearas
0
0%
Banquets, Fundraisers, & Other Special
6
4%
Events (Private Rentals)
Community & Non -Profit Meetings & Events
122
7°
Newport -Mesa Unified school District
0
0%
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recruitment
34
21%
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
0
V/o
Testing
162
IC I M
eats
an uet lecture ormat
0
-FFTTTFri
y,
ODNALO UVN�GAN LIBRARY! NEIGHVCRHOGG CGNNVNITY CENTER NENOYATGN
0 �>
0
0 0 C.
\i "I
MIL N M
eats
an uet lecture ormat
NCC M IN P C
N IN
Victoria Room I It of Events WIF
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties 0 0%
Quincenearas 0 0%
Banquets, Fundraisers, & Other special 12 7%
Events (Private Rentals 14
Community !Von -Profit Meetinas Events 128 75%
City Meetings, Tri
Testing, Program
City of Newport E
Testino
IC I M
an uet events
.'o..... Hamilton Froom
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary Parties
Quincenearras
Banquets, Fundraisers, & Other Special
Events (Private Rentals)
Community & Non -Profit Meetings & Even
Newport -Mesa Unified school District
pity Meetings, Train
170
#€ of Events
0
0
6
Testing, Programs, I MIL N M
City of New Bea an uet events
Testing
2
8%
0%
°la
0%
0%
4%
0%
21%
0%
IC I M
eats
an uet lecture ormat
0
'CO)
70
L
---------- ), 0 0 0
0
------ . _ MIL N M
, eats
an uet lecture ormat
y,
ODNALO UVN�GAN LIBRARY! NEIGHVCRHOGG CGNNVNITY CENTER NENOYATGN
NCC M IN P C
M
IN IN
Victoria Room IC I M
Weddings & Wedding Anniversary
Meeting lecture events
Quinoenearas
Banquets, Fundraisers, & other Special
Events (Private Rentals
Community & Non -Profit Meetings & Events
Newport -Mesa Unified School District
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recruitment
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HIS Recruitment
Testina
.o.....a' � o I'1 ool'ti'1
eddings & Wedding Anniversary Par
uincenearas
anquets, Fundraisers, & Other Special
is (Private Rentals)
Community & Non -Profit Meetings & Events
Newport -Mesa Unified school District
City Meetings, Trainings, HR Recruitment
Testing, Programs, Classes
City of Newport Beach - HR Recruitment
Testina
7%
76%
10%
8%
MIL N M
Meeting lecture events
122
0
34
4°lO
75%
0%
21%
0%
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
NC e-% IJtility
• City keeps detailed records (rented, non -
rented and city meeting use)
• City can precisely match meeting space
with renter need.
• NCC uti I i ed at
• City maintains at
• Other, better meeting space available city
wide
• Use of NCC will continue to decrease
unless it becomes more competitive
C PI L I N Existing facilities 58
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
NCC Utility
• City keeps detailed records (rented, non -
rented and city meeting use)
• City can precisely match meeting space
with renter need.
• NCC utilized at 30%
• City maintains at 1000/-
Other,
00%
Other, better meeting space available city
wide
• Use of NCC will continue to decrease
unless it becomes more competitive
C PI L I N Existing facilities 59
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
NCC Utility
• City keeps detailed records (rented, non -
rented and city meeting use)
• City can precisely match meeting space
with renter need.
• NCC utilized at 30%
• City maintains at 1000/-
Other,
00%
Other, better meeting space available city
wide
• Use of NCC will continue to decrease
unless it becomes more competitive
CITY OPERATED MEETING ROOM INVENTORY
W
C PI L I N Existing facilities 60
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
NCC Utility
• City keeps detailed records (rented, non -
rented and city meeting use)
• City can precisely match meeting space
with renter need.
• NCC utilized at 30%
• City maintains at 1000/-
Other,
00%
Other, better meeting space available city
wide
• Use of NCC will continue to decrease
unless it becomes more competitive
CITY OPERATED MEETING ROOM INVENTORY
W
C PI L I N Existing facilities 61
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
NCC Utility
• City keeps detailed records (rented, non -
rented and city meeting use)
• City can precisely match meeting space
with renter need.
• NCC utilized at 30%
• City maintains at 1000/-
Other,
00%
Other, better meeting space available city
wide
• Use of NCC will continue to decrease
unless it becomes more competitive
C PI L I N
CITY OPERATED MEETING ROOM INVENTORY
W
Existing facilities 62
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
NCC Utility
• City keeps detailed records (rented, non -
rented and city meeting use)
• City can precisely match meeting space
with renter need.
• NCC utilized at 30%
• City maintains at 100%
• Other, better meeting space available city
wide
• Use of NCC will continue to decrease
unless it becomes more competitive
C PI L I N Existing facilities 63
The Need for an Expanded Library
M
N IN LL
/
,
N
IN N ; / .�.�b MESAVLRDL
r LIBRARY
l (OCPL)
r
1 ,P
r
1
/
r
r
1
1
1
REBpN�I I r Pp —
rNNN I 1� { 119mi3r
DUNGAN LIBRARY 4
' ■ 110NS I\
Imix �
.E�rom��d ■. •r�
a JL'j mt
�\ A �r�l�(.�
ORANGE
COAST
COLLEGE ,..
OCC [IBIWtY —'� .wwos
�CIVIC cErdTER
I
COSTA
MESA TECH.
LIBRARY /
SOUTH
COAST
PLAZA
❑ /
/
/
/
/
N P
C
t
1
/
♦
t
c
f
WMEM
exiva� / IIgPBPM (Npry1
P=?� !•
❑ /
/
/
/
/
N P
C
Mesa erde ranc
Library
f
emodeled
N
Donald Dungan
Library
N IN LL
!
/
!
,
I
- SOUTH
COAST i L
PLAZA
/
r 69ESAVERDE
r
LIBRARY
f ORANGE
f I COAST
f , _ COLLEGE TemN
! •
f
� orc uewwr
f LI6R�'AY
civic cEraTeR
�wimerxioo�ar rymicu f� A
o..Ea
� cosrA <�!�
�r��. ■ MESA TECH.
LIBRARY V
DUNGAN LIBRARY W
vmm )
1
-rim
\ A ' lexiva� / IIXPpPM (xpryl
,fi
C
N IN LL
,
..,
------------
Mesa erde ranc,����:�
Library
,'
COST
/
PLAZA
emodeledop
..,
F�l ,
..
C
/
LIB AVEFC3E
�
RY
r LIBRARY
l (0CPLi
,
OPANGE
/
/
COAST
COLLEGE
Library
ervice
rea
,'
N IN LL
/
Mesa erde ranc ;
Library
,
/
7 /
emodeled
1
r
r
r
t
Library ervice rea ,
r
` COAST i L
P147A
„z�.. F�l /
/
/
69ESAVERDE
LIBRARY �
/
,
OPQNGE /
COAST /
COLLEGE �
422�61�3e 6't�-64,1
o - Q
Cy M.J
iro; td
1
Donald Dungan
r
Library
f i ti
a MEQ,
j
/ I I iram3�
I I I 1
V DUNGAN LIBRARY
vmm
a JL'j mt
Library ervice rea
7
C VIC MITER
T
COSTA
ME SA TEC H.
LIBRARY V
C
t
1
♦
t
<
f
{' WMEM
IhIPNPY fMMr1
C
Alt I
9; �10,
s.
ii
Oki
AL
■ L
Donald Dungan ' / 77-77-7 7,
Library
f it
j
! I
r I I
DUNGAN LIBRARY
V � unr's i
4
\ p J U W -
Library ervice rea
7
CHIC MITER \.
T
/
/
COSTA
MESA TECH.
LIBRARY V
a
t
1
i
f
{/ NAR.ERS
�R / IMPpPY fPMr1
N P
C
4 ..
x � .
fi_ a
ower on t enior
NMI- Costa Mesa enior — — Community '� ----�
1 Center ;>
Donald Dungan
Library
INIR/ I mile ���
I
DUNGAN LIBRARY - f
ittier lementary
cool
{' NARHERS
---F
Library ervice rea
Mesa erde ranc
Library
f
emodeled
N IN N
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
i�
/
Library ervice rea ,
I I
is
Donald Dungan ; xxE xra
Library
DUNGAN LIBRARY
vmm
�r�
.ex9nnRy��d
■.Y11
L 1...y
69ESAVERDE
LIBRARY
l
(0CPLi
r —
Library ervice rea ,
I I
is
Donald Dungan ; xxE xra
Library
Library ervice rea 9
COAST i L�
PLAZA
/
/
ORANGE mx/
COAST /
COLLEGE /
OCC 119R — /
CIVIC CENTER JWRY \\
e�exa um� /'
COSTA
MESA TECH.
LIBRARY V
xxx�I
c
t
E�Ew"Mam. �
<
{' NARHERS
rx' a�exiva� / IhIRNPY fxpN1
► x���m� N P C
DUNGAN LIBRARY
vmm
�r�
.ex9nnRy��d
■.Y11
L 1...y
Library ervice rea 9
COAST i L�
PLAZA
/
/
ORANGE mx/
COAST /
COLLEGE /
OCC 119R — /
CIVIC CENTER JWRY \\
e�exa um� /'
COSTA
MESA TECH.
LIBRARY V
xxx�I
c
t
E�Ew"Mam. �
<
{' NARHERS
rx' a�exiva� / IhIRNPY fxpN1
► x���m� N P C
Mesa erde ranc
Library
f
emodeled
N IN N
Donald Dungan
Library
1
SOUTH
COAST BMWa
/ PLAZA
r9ESAVERDE
LIBRARY-
l fOCPLi ���goo
� `
OPANGF
COAST
! COLLEGE Tema
� UCC IIBMAItY — .��os
FAIEV ID NAPP. - ocam nnura
, LI6R�'AY
�1 CIVIC CEII � `1. Costa Mesa
T ,'� ec nology Library
COSTA
neMeniry ■
MESA
LECH.
LIBRARY �
1 �
DUNGAN LIBRARY
vmm )
1
=flu ow.����
R MM(Mpry1
`�— I L ---� r aR /• J
a .m N P C
Mesa erde ranc
Library
f
emodeled
N IN N
Donald Dungan
Library
N IN LL
/
I
/ SOUTH
/ COAST
/ PLAZA
/
r
/
. - 69ESAVER DE
/ LIBRARY
l fOCPLi
1 � ORANGE
COAST
COLLEGE Tema
f I
occ 119 n
1
1 FAIFV ID NAPV.kr
ocam niiur,l
LIWRY
1 ft CIVIC CEtI
I >
COSTA
MESA TECH.
LIBRARY ~
DUNGAN LIBRARY
\ 1 �in..s '� f• 1 E�E�MaR �
vmm )
oR, L
e � NAR.ERS
L
a� .m N P
C
Costa Mesa
ec nology Library
Newport eac Mariners
ranc Library
f
replaced library
built in
Program attendance per 22 .13 .06
capita
PC use per capita .91 .63 .63
enc mark
Practices
wan Library
%or
California
Orange
Existing
County
Donald Dungan
OCPL benchmark practices SF per capita
.44
.31
.14
• Donald Dungan libraryItems per capita
2.13
2.44
1.39
Seats per 1,000
2.6
2.67
1
library program
Circulation per capita
6.41
5.12
1.9
PCs per 1,000
.53
.44
.32
Meeting seats per 1,000
2.5
-
.8
Visits per capita
4.41
4.59
4.12
Program attendance per 22 .13 .06
capita
PC use per capita .91 .63 .63
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
.Dungan Library
State and OCPL benchmark practices
Right -sizing Donald Dungan library
Proposed library program
C PI L I N Library building program 76
D N LD D N N LI NDN I
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
.Dungan Library
State and OCPL benchmark practices
Right -sizing Donald Dungan library
Proposed library program
Less collections more readers' seats
Self —check machines (4)
Automated materials handling
Group study rooms (4)
Market place/self service stations
C PI L I N
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
Library building program
771
- •� ;
�4 I
Iww !
LWI
low
k 1
I -
JR
r
vt
L�-tujk'1�514�i'*'IIJ il��r
r
Ltd.
Wy � �
rw
am-
kwWir
a
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
1
Adw
- - .. � - rSr lwT�•f- ��
C ID I L &L L
1
C PI L I N Library building program 79
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
N Ic
• C ILD N
• N
• P D M
• SELF SERVICE & AMHS
• MARKET PLACE
QW
roseville rotary (& reading room
•. 3TA�iUC1[iCO�f[Y
v
-ANEW
C PI L I N Library building program 80
11
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
I
IN L
• INN
• L
IC D
I NC N
• C L& IN
• ND
• D NL D L
IN
1.11
1
-.—'i ��„�� Ra�uaaae, a:a niarmila�MWa i1�i•IF+.. +.
son
as J.aa��tlaa.aj a
• y �®Maelva�•• - -
ajRa..a..... —
n -
--AIL
�r,�R Kry�G
C PI L I N Library building program 81
D N LDD N NLI NDN I
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
Existing facilities
• NCC and library in poor condition
• NCC 3 times the size it needs to
be or should be
• Library 1/3 the size it needs to be
• Park enhancements, safety and
security improvements
C PI L I N
- MON.— A a WA6 T" �A'ft L
144
fu
Existing facilities 82
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
, 74 P. PO
!!*AO70
got
P I N NCC C M N LI
rAllbblab
a
D N N LI C M N C MM NI C N
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 83
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C PI L I N
P I N
ILD N LI ILDIN M NCC,
L"Ou
New library, community center and park enhancement options 84
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
-:Mji&7 ,�► �i�%�
P I NI N NCC P I NII M
NCC
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 85
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N „ „ i-- Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P
P I NI N NCC P I NII M NCC
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 86
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N I I Council Meeting November 17, 2015
_-A
P
P I NI N NCC P I NII M NCC
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 87
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N Council Meeting November 17, 2015
r�� a
b?'
Y'
Rowe
F
At lik
VP
_ r
i
fell ' illI'>1S�i�i 1� P I NII M NCC
_Its ;_ ii
fiFl�l.' !! = 'R. 'M - We W -.-I rw ... -4-OR
�.. —1�!�
C PI L I N
New library, community center and park enhancement options 88
4
L M
IN
M
L
300 SEATS
C M N C N NC C N �^
y '1
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P
_-A
P I NI N NCC P I NII M NCC
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 90
P I N1 N NCC
C PI L I N
�L
v
I N I ILI D
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
1r
i
NCC
New library, community center and park enhancement options 91
P I N1 N NCC
C PI L I N
v
I N I ILI
D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
it -
N +�
-P
n 4
NCC
New library, community center and park enhancement options 92
I
JA
NOEL
N N LI I IN I IN NCC
y
46_
4��
LI
C MM NI M IN
M
P,
%mole
/ #
ff� �
11.1111111W .0
C MM NI C N
M IN M
5 a ❑ ,
ri
932 5E 1518 5F
❑ Q P r
M NI--
RA
D N LD D N N LI I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
r
n Y
7
P I NII M NCC
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 94
�—�
amlj wx -
�yl •nom ���.
1
rec�mdner � �• '3 cwn���. �r�
C MM NI
M IN M
C MM NI M IN
M
7
❑ � manna Rmw
%i�
LF;
Y n
a
yo,
I I
N
LI
%i�
LF;
Y n
a
yo,
WW
amlj wx -
1 rec�mdner � �• 3 cwn���. � _
N LI
LI
C MM NI M IN
M
,
LI C MM NI
M IN M
C MM NI C N
M IN M
7
Ilk -
Yµ
lb�:..
Rte. a ,,. :•
1618 SF
932 SF El 0
0 0 ❑
0 0 r-
-1 L El 0
0 El 13
0 0 El
El us 0
El
El
J D Ll 0
Lj—
Ej
r----
754 SF
ri I
C7 C
E3000000000110
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 m C3 Q Q
1:1 11
Fj 0
1166 SF El D
El 0
0 Cl
El El
El
Ei
789 SF —1 F
F
M.
7-7 !
C �L pir
10 13
❑ o-
/ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
101 L1 ❑ ❑
/ ❑ o' ❑
/ o o to
o ❑ o
/ o
o ❑ o ❑
o n o 0
r'
n E
❑❑
.r
❑ ❑ ❑
iCL
yy
L 6!
l
/ ❑ ❑
L
`t�— =_
D N LDD N NLI NDN I
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P I NILI N P P N P C C
C PI L I N
P I N LI N P P N P C C
New library, community center and park enhancement options
D N LDD N NLI NDN I
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C PI L I N
New library, community center and park enhancement options 100
I IN
•
°•i
� t
ILrte.
C ID ILDIN C P
0
V
Ak
J
• • • ' -
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P I N I PL N
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 102
D N LDD N NLI NDN I
C PI L I N
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
P I NI
a
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
P I NII
New library, community center and park enhancement options 103
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
E
I NI M
P I NII
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 104
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
�—�► • Design of new, efficient library not
constrained by existing NCC
footprint
• Potential extra cost with unknowns
associated with NCC renovation
• New building siting improves all
buildings' relationship with the park
C PI L I N
P I NII
New library, community center and park enhancement options 105
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
go
P I NII ILD N LI
s
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
7
ILDIN M NCC, C N D N N N C MM NI M IN C N M
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 106
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
• No program is removed without first replacing it
• Library program area is increased by 150%
rogoftaj
• 8,000 SF of new meeting space is provided and " right -sized" to reflect
need at Lions Park and availability of other City -operated meeting space
options "
t
• Increase usable park open space by 1 acre
• Improve quality and sustainability of Lions Park
• Improve visibility to and access through the park in order to address
security problems in the park
• Reduce annual operating costs with new state-of-the-art building systems
and energy efficient building enclosures.
C PI L I N
P I NII ILD N LI ILDIN M NCC, C N D N N N C MM NI M IN C N M
New library, community center and park enhancement options 107
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
ram is r*mov�
4►ii 9i
g, g
eed-at Lion
onions
- Mc;j�easlak
hbwmme quali
v
to address
a'- \7 W_,
• Reduce annual operating costs with new state-of-the-art building systems
and energy efficient building enclosures.
P I NII ILD N LI ILDIN M NCC, C N D N N N C MM NI M IN C N M
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 108
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
ram is r*mov�
M IN N NQ
..�C .....� . !
4►ii 9i
g, g
eed-at Lion
onions
ove q u a I i
to address
a'- \7 W_,
• Reduce annual operating costs with new state-of-the-art building systems
and energy efficient building enclosures.
P I NII ILD N LI ILDIN M NCC, C N D N N N C MM NI M IN C N M
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 109
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
ram rs r*movi
4►�ii
10M S441��
eed-at Lion
dons
Vmc;j�eas
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
to address
• Reduce annual operating costs with new state-of-the-art building systems
and energy efficient building enclosures.
P I NII ILD N LI ILDIN M NCC, C N D N N N C MM NI M IN C N M
C PI L I N New library, community center and park enhancement options 110
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
4►�ii
C PI L I N
ram rs r*movi
10M S441��
eed-at Lion
dons
Vm;j�ea.
to address
Reduce annual operating costs with new state-of-the-art building systems
and energy efficient building enclosures.
P I NII ILD N LI ILDIN M NCC, C N D N N N C MM NI M IN C N M
New library, community center and park enhancement options 111
Recommended Option: Cost
11
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Three projects, two phases 113
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
0
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Three projects, two phases 114
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
0
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Three Projects 115
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N Three projects, two phases 116
Parking for Lions Park
117
D N N 7
C I NC N
RECREATION CENTER
G
NCC
{
n itis
�v
AL_AL
D N N LI
I z -0 -1-4. 6
■
6wPARK AVE PARk AVE
•
PARK FIRE STATION
r!
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI N P L P IN P C
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Parking 119
D N LDD N NLI NDN I
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI N P P C
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Parking
1201
D N LDD N NLI NDN I
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI N P P C
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Parking
1211
D N LDD N NLI NDN I
D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI N P P C
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Parking
1221
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Parking 123
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Parking 124
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Parking 125
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI N P L P IN P C
LI , C MM NI C N ND P C MM ND I N
Parking 126
_ 1 l
❑°
0 0 0
SOMAN was
J`- -- ------------------- — —J
-❑ -❑ --11--❑-ir-0-❑-cr❑-❑-❑-❑-❑-
❑ ❑
I� ❑ ❑
f ❑ ❑
L❑
P
❑
❑
❑ d
❑ ❑
I IN P P D
P C P C
Design
128
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
What should it look like?
I IMP
I N
LI ND C C Next Steps in the Design Process 129
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
W,
44161 slow,
-,A
4L
'm -f
jjm�
r- �.Ok J�4413
L 1�10
o!
....... ....... . . . . . .
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 130
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
r
C MM NI LI IN P
LI ND C C Next Steps in the Design Process 131
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D
C MM NI LI
r Lim
City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI ND C C Next Steps in the Design Process 132
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C MM NI LI IN P
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 133
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C MM NI LI IN P
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 134
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C MM NI LI IN P
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 135
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
1
10�
C MM NI LI IN P
... Pl I � , -, 6.
i
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 136
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
--
4
�, �.• R - -y "'r itR •h � s � lx �f(�rb � ter- - ..
• ��� I4,t,�
L^r' 4 '•. •aCa
xew
& 10
�����I Ilii i I _ �� • ��II � �' � „� � �= - - _ � � �N ��_� - �
-7 117T Z
I l
^�_,^ e-ar.'•c,. '.:� i 'rKnrs ,`wyc rw. -.. .'rte ��;s� � s v d- sn rr - � -
a
r
C MM NI LI IN P
LI ND C C Next Steps in the Design Process 137
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
C MM NI LI IN P
LI ND C C Next Steps in the Design Process 138
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
� _ L
y �EACf
_:?Y 0� MA�NFI1 r•
PUBLIC IBRARY
'auMY LIBRARY
Los ANC-SLES C
LI ND C C
Next Steps in the Design Process 139
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
0.
PUBLIC LIBRARY
'ntTY ugRARY SYSTEM
LOS ANCCLES Cau
LI ND C C Next Steps in the Design Process 140
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
UUM
-`Tima
r !�
LI ND C C Next Steps in the Design Process 141
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
IL
•� 1■1OWL
its
LI ND C C
IEEE ! 1 -_9
SINN
IE
I
,iw
�.
r �
-_ 44-,
Next Steps in the Design Process 142
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 143
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 144
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
r
AM
-q"
M N N C
LI ND C C
LL D
L ILL
Next Steps in the Design Process 145
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 146
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
IF -1
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 147
D N LD D N N LI NDN I D C MM NI C N N I N I ILI D City Council Meeting November 17, 2015
LI NDC C Next Steps in the Design Process 148
149
City of Costa Mesa
New Donald Dungan Library,
NCC, & Park Improvements
Project at Lions Park
i � �°� CITY (lF THF. ARTS O
'NC�RPORLiSEC `aj�i
City Council
November 17, 2015
Financing Options
! CTFY OF THF..
Funding Options
1. Funding without debt
2. Funding with debt
3. Funding with reduced debt
Z
Cn n
Library, NCC, -,&.. P a rk
Improvements Project
Funding Options
1. Funding without debt
• Avoids ongoing debt payments
• Delays start to FY 19-20
• Uses some gas tax and park fees
• Uses nearly all general fund capital
project funding for 4 years
• Uses first year of savings when
2003 COP is complete
3
VA
-C'Ibraly, NCC, &. Park-
�F
THF. ARTS
Rb-
mprovements P
Funding Options
2. Funding with debt
v
• Facilitates early start of project
• Uses some gas tax and park fees
• Debt of $29,728,000
• Annual payment of $1,807,529 for
30 years
11
mprovements ro�ect
Funding Options
3. Funding with reduced debt
• Start of project could be FY 16-17
• Uses some gas tax and park fees
• Uses all FY 16-17 1.5% cap. facilities funds
• Uses half the 5% CIP funds
• Debt of $25,258,131
• Lower annual payment: $1,535,751
5
rarv,f!//
ju CTFY OF THF. ARTS
mprovemeants P
Repayment Options
1. Use all 1.5% Capital Facilities Funds
for first three years then convert to
2003 COP funds in FY 19-20
2. Transient Occupancy Tax increase
3. Property Tax rate increase or parcel tax
4. Local Sales Tax Increase
no
ibrarvNCCTI&Pa c
Improvements Project
Recommended Actions
• Funding option 3: reduced debt
• Include funding for Fire Station 1
• Repay debt using 1.5% capital facilities funds
Fill in the gap with CIP funds
• Convert to 2003 COP funds in FY 19-20
No tax increase required
Citv of Cosa ... Asa
Library, NCC, &Park
Improvements at Lions Park
City Council Meeting
November 17, 2015
Financing Options
IF THE ARTS
RV