HomeMy WebLinkAbout11 - PH-1 - Amendments to Sobeca & Westside Urban Pl - 4/5/2016CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: APRIL 5, 2016 ITEM NUMBER: PH -1
SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO THE SOBECA AND WESTSIDE URBAN PLANS:
• SP -05-06 Al: SoBECA Urban Plan;
• SP -05-07 Al: 19 West Urban Plan;
• SP -05-08 A2: Mesa West Urban Plan;
• SP -05-09 Al: Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban Plan
DATE: MARCH 23, 2016
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CLAIRE L. FLYNN, AICP
ASST. DEV. SVCS. DIRECTOR (7141754-5278
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the proposed Urban Plan Amendments by adoption of the attached resolution.
BACKGROUND
Joint Study Session of September 8, 2015
The City Council and Planning Commission conducted a joint study session to provide
feedback to staff regarding a potential amendment to the Urban Plans. The study
session report and online video may be found at:
http://www.costamesaca.gov/index.aspx?page=1823
Attachment 3 provides a brief summary of comments from the joint study session with
City Council and Planning Commission. These comments formed the basis of staff's
recommendation for the Urban Plan Amendment.
City Council hearing of October 6, 2015
City Council directed staff to proceed with the Urban Plan Amendments as described in
Table A in its entirety. No additional changes were made to the proposed amendments.
Minutes to the Council meeting are attached (Attachment 4).
Planning Commission hearing of March 14, 2016
Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed Urban Plan amendments.
A representative from the CAMP/LAB spoke in support of the changes and advocated for
allowance of short-term rentals in the SoBECA Overlay Zone. (Attachment 5, Draft
Meeting Minutes). Please see the link below for the report:
http://www.costamesaca.gov/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=21168
ANALYSIS
Proposed Project — Urban Plan Amendments
The proposed project involves City -initiated Urban Plan Amendments to amend
development regulations and to provide additional clarification/discussion related to
mixed-use, live/work, and residential development in the overlay zones (as applicable), for
the following Urban Plans:
Description of Urban Plans:
• SP -05-06 Al - SoBECA Urban Plan: The SoBECA Urban Plan establishes
provisions for mixed-use development in the 39 -acre SoBECA plan area. This area
is primarily characterized by light industrial, office, and general commercial uses
and is bounded by Baker Street (north), Bristol Street (east), and SR -73 (west).
• SP -05-07 Al - 19 West Urban Plan: The 19 West Urban Plan area consists of 103
acres of industrial, commercial, and residential uses. The plan area is located in
the Westside, generally along 19th Street, Superior Boulevard, and southeast of
Victoria Street and Placentia Avenue.
• SP -05-08 A2 - Mesa West Urban Plan: The Mesa West Urban Plan area is
approximately 277 acres in size. The plan area is generally located south of
Victoria Street, west of Superior Avenue, and to the City's western and southern
corporate limits.
• SP -05-09 Al - Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban Plan: This overlay plan
area consists of 238 acres of high- and medium -density residential uses. In the
mixed-use overlay zone, applicants with qualified projects may apply for specified
residential development standards/incentives or a density bonus pursuant to an
approved site-specific Master Plan.
The current Urban Plan documents may be downloaded per the link below:
http://www.costamesaca.gov/index.aspx?page=102
Summary Description of Urban Plan Amendments:
The Urban Plan amendments generally relate to the following, as specified:
(1) Develop new architectural exhibits and illustrative exhibits of desirable architectural
prototypes to promote architectural excellence.
(2) Revise Certain Development Standards in specified Urban Plans
(3) Increase Open Space Requirements.
(4) Promote architectural excellence, transitioning, and integration.
(5) Promote and better define work space in live/work unit.
(See Table A on the following page for more information.)
Table A — Proposed Urban Plan Amendments
Proposed Text Amendment SoBECA 19 West Mesa
West
Bluffs
Residential
Ownership
1. Urban Plan Boundaries and Architectural Exhibits:
• Reflect No Changes to Urban Plan Boundaries
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
• Develop new architectural exhibits and illustrative
■
■
■
■
exhibits of desirable architectural prototypes to
promote architectural excellence.
2. Revise Certain Development Standards.
• Add provision allowing development lots of less
■
■
■
■
than one acre provided that the development
standards are met.
• Increase 10 -foot front setback requirement to a 15-
■
■
■
NA
foot front setback.
• Remove all references to tandem garages.
■
■
■
■
• Clarify that other development standards from
■
■
NA
NA
different urban plans may apply to a project.
3. Increase Open Space Requirements.
• Increase minimum 10% open space requirement to
■
■
■
NA
30%, but allow a 10% allowance for roof deck
areas.
• Allow square footage of roof decks to be partially
■
■
■
NA
counted towards the open space requirement.
10% allowance).
4. Promote architectural excellence, transitioning, and integration.
• Add design guidelines or standards such as
■
■
■
■
stepped elevations from two-story to three-story
along street frontage to avoid shear walls along
minimum front setback.
• Require very distinct architectural treatment and
■
■
■
■
varying surface materials/finishes among the
different units of a proposed multi -story
development.
• Require commitment to the originally -approved
■
■
■
■
color board and materials for the project, unless
otherwise modified by Planning Commission
5. Promote and better define work space in live/work unit.
• Mandate that work spaces cannot include a
■
■
■
NA
bathroom with a shower/or bath.
• Preclude use of any units for short-term vacation
■
■
■
NA
rentals, boarding house use, Air B&B, etc.
• Require that work spaces be specifically designated
■
■
■
NA
for office/commercial purposes and cannot be used
as a bedroom. Buyer notification required.
Notes: "NA" indicates not applicable.
" ■ " indicates that the Proposed Urban Plan Amendment shall include this change, as described.
Objectives of the Proposed Urban Plan Amendment
The Urban Plans have been in place for almost ten years (since April 2006). During
this time, the City processed about 19 development projects which have entitlements,
selling, under construction, or pending plancheck. Over two dozen urban plan
screening requests have also been considered by City Council. Graphic exhibits are
attached (Attachment 2).
The objectives of the Urban Plan amendments include the following:
• Make timely revisions to the documents based on experience gained with
projects under construction.
• Provide additional guidance to applicants to promote architectural excellence,
open space, and
• Address comments from City officials and the community on certain Urban
Plan requirements.
New Architectural Renderings
One of the critiques of the new construction projects in the Urban Plan areas is the lack
of architectural variety. The community has expressed concerns regarding the
appearance of stark, contemporary elevations and muted color palettes.
Pursuant to the Council's direction, staff solicited proposals from qualified architectural
firms for architectural services to prepare prototype drawings representing different
architectural styles.
• Different prototypes of street elevation/perspective views for live/work
development in accordance with the standards of the Westside Urban Plan;
three to four stories with roof decks and at a maximum density of 20 du/acre.
• Architectural styles represent variety of contemporary and traditional design with
a focus on traditional architecture and materials relative to Costa Mesa (Beach
Bungalow, Spanish Colonial, and Ranch Style).
These additional architectural prototypes will be incorporated into the newly amended
Urban Plan documents.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed amendments to the Urban Plans have been reviewed for compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA guidelines, and the
City's environmental procedures, and have been found to be exempt pursuant to
Section 15061 (b)(3) (General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines. It can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the passage of these Urban Plan Amendments
will have a significant effect on the environment.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
The proposed Urban Plan Amendments conform to the following General Plan Land
Use Goal, Objective, and Policy:
GOAL LU -1: LAND USE
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a balanced community
of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and institutional uses to satisfy the
needs of the social and economic segments of the population and to retain the
residential character of the City; to meet the competing demands for alternative
developments within each land use classification within reasonable land use intensity
limits; and, to ensure the long term viability and productivity of the community's natural
and man-made environments.
Objective LU -1A. Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the
community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level no greater than
can be supported by the infrastructure.
LU -1A.1 Provide for the development of a mix and balance of housing
opportunities, commercial goods and services, and employment opportunities in
consideration of the needs of the business and residential segments of the community.
ALTERNATIVES
City Council has the following alternatives available for consideration:
1. Approve Urban Plan Amendments with modifications, by adoption of the Council
resolution.
2. Receive and file. No changes to the Urban Plans will be made.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has approved the attached resolution as to form.
FISCAL REVIEW
Fiscal review is not required.
CONCLUSION
The Urban Plan amendments have been drafted based on the feedback and direction
obtained at the joint study session in September 2015, City Council meeting in October
2015, and Planning Commission meeting in March 2016. The changes reflect the
specific action plan authorized by the City Council.
CLAIRE L. FLYNN, AICP GARY ARMSTRONG, AICP
Asst. Dev. Svcs. Director Deputy CEO/Dev. Svcs. Director
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution
2. Photo & Graphic Exhibits of Development Projects
3. Joint Studv Session Minute Summary
4. Council Minutes 10/06/2016
5. Draft Planning Commission Minutes 4/14/2016
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE
FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO THE URBAN PLANS:
• SP -05-06 Al: SoBECA Urban Plan;
• SP -05-07 Al: 19 West Urban Plan;
• SP -05-08 A2: Mesa West Urban Plan;
• SP -05-09 Al: Mesa West Residential Ownership
Urban Plan.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, City Council adopted the following Urban Plans in April 2006, and
the Urban Plan sets forth development standards and land use regulations relating to
the nature and extent of land uses and structures in compliance with the City's 2000
General Plan;
WHEREAS, SP -05-06 SoBECA Urban Plan establishes provisions for mixed-use
development in the 39 -acre SoBECA plan area. This area is primarily characterized by
light industrial, office, and general commercial uses and is bounded by Baker Street
(north), Bristol Street (east), and SR -73 (west),
WHEREAS, SP -05-07 19 West Urban Plan consists of 103 acres of industrial,
commercial, and residential uses. The plan area is located in the Westside, generally
along 19th Street, Superior Boulevard, and southeast of Victoria Street and Placentia
Avenue.
WHEREAS, SP -05-08 Mesa West Urban Plan area is approximately 277 acres
in size. The plan area is generally located south of Victoria Street, west of Superior
Avenue, and to the City's western and southern corporate limits;
WHEREAS, SP -05-09 Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban Plan consists of
238 acres of high- and medium -density residential uses. In the mixed-use overlay zone,
applicants with qualified projects may apply for specified residential development
standards/incentives or a density bonus pursuant to an approved site-specific Master
Plan;
'—
WHEREAS, the proposed Urban Plan amendments involve certain text
amendments to the following Urban Plan documents:
• SP -05-06 Al: SoBECA Urban Plan;
• SP -05-07 Al: 19 West Urban Plan;
• SP -05-08 A2: Mesa West Urban Plan;
• SP -05-09 Al: Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban Plan;
WHEREAS, the proposed Urban Plan amendments also include a set of
architectural prototypes (Spanish Colonial, Craftsman Style, and Bungalow) which will
be included in each Urban Plan as illustrative exhibits (see Exhibits of the resolution);
WHEREAS, a joint study session of the City Council and Planning Commission
was held in September 2015;
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2016, City Council directed staff to proceed with
proposed Urban Plan Amendments to include textual amendments to the plan
document related to mixed-use development, live/work units, and residential loft
provisions, as specified by Council;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed Urban Plan
amendments and recommended Council approval of the proposed changes at a public
hearing on March 14, 2016;
WHEREAS, City Council conducted a public hearing on April 5, 2016, with all
persons having been given the opportunity to be heard both for and against the
proposed project;
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the Urban Plans have been reviewed
for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA
guidelines, and the City's environmental procedures, and has been found to be exempt
pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) (General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the
City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that the passage of these Urban Plan amendments will have a significant effect on the
environment;
WHEREAS, proposed Urban Plan Amendments are found to be in conformance
with the City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan, with specific regard to General Plan Land
Use Goal, Objective, and Policy, as follows:
GOAL LU -1: LAND USE
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a balanced
community of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and institutional uses
to satisfy the needs of the social and economic segments of the population and to
retain the residential character of the City; to meet the competing demands for
alternative developments within each land use classification within reasonable land
use intensity limits; and, to ensure the long term viability and productivity of the
community's natural and man-made environments.
Objective LU -1A. Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the
community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level no greater
than can be supported by the infrastructure.
LU -1A.1 Provide for the development of a mix and balance of housing
opportunities, commercial goods and services, and employment opportunities in
consideration of the needs of the business and residential segments of the
community;
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City that
said Urban Plan Amendments be adopted;
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council HEREBY APPROVES the Urban Plan
amendments as identified in following exhibits:
• Exhibit 1: SP -05-06 Al: SoBECA Urban Plan;
• Exhibit 2: SP -05-07 Al: 19 West Urban Plan;
• Exhibit 3: SP -05-08 A2: Mesa West Urban Plan;
• Exhibit 4: SP -05-09 Al: Mesa West Residential Ownership
• Exhibit 5: Architectural Prototypes
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Exhibit 5 represents the architectural
prototype exhibits that shall be appended to each Urban Plan as "Appendix A:
Illustrative Architectural Prototype Exhibits"
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5T" day of April 2016.
Stephen Mensinger, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green
City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF COSTA MESA)
CITY OF COSTA MESA)
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at the regular meeting of the City Council
held on the day of , 2016, and thereafter at the regular meeting of said
City Council duly held on the day of , 2016, was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Brenda Green
City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
�0
Exhibit 1:
SP -05-06 A1: SoBECA Urban Plan
TABLE A - SoBECA URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD
Deviations from development standards may be granted through the master plan
approval process with consideration to existing development configuration,
compatibility of adjacent uses, inclusion of pedestrian -oriented space, and/or inclusion
of amenities along -the street side.
Maximum Floor Area Ratio for mixed-use
development project (including residential
uses)
• Commercial Base Zoning District
1.0 FAR
• Industrial Base Zoning District
1.0 FAR
Minimum Floor Area Ratio for
nonresidential component of development
• Commercial Base Zoning District
0.15 FAR
• Industrial Base Zoning District
0.175 FAR
Minimum Lot Size
Minimum One Acre
Exception: Development lot% of less than one acre may br allowmi as a devimimi
from„[his req uirement pmVided that all other development standards are nut.
Overall Maximum Building Height for
4 stories/ 60 feet
Mixed -Use Project
(Roof gardens/terraces in mixed-use development projects -shall not be considered a
story.)
• Max. Building Height for
2 stories/ 40 feet
Nonresidential Component:
• Max. Building Height for
4 stories/60 feet
Residential Component:
(Lofts, as defined in Section 13-6 of the Zoning Code, without exterior access and
having only clerestory windows will not be regarded as a story.
Attics
Attics shall not be heated or cooled, nor contain any electrical outlets or operable
windows. Attics above the maximum number of stories shall be an integral part of the
building roofline and not appear as an additional story on any building elevation.
Windows in any attic space above the maximum number of stories shall be incidental
and limited to a dormer style.
Maximum Lot Coverage
90%
I'2..---
_ 13�_
TABLE A - SoBECA URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
Minimum Open Space
Development Lot:
Mininium 30% optnt space nxuired. 'Phis tninilnum o . est y .ace n uirement strict]
ggplies to the ov_e.1U1I duvciopment lol circa at eradec Ho,Kc& the smart footage of
roof decks may heptntially counted towards the minimum aln n ,pace rcyuimment by
a maximum 10 Lrcent allowance.
n i �� "iik�LriFll
-be in 1ll:t`HHi•H}HN'+
rl sjdei+6 —o ." 3¢e Fe(
_Residential Open Space:
Minimus t 200 sq. ft. r dwel I ing unit of residential component
This ri uirement dcx.-s not apply to live/work units
Residential open space may be any combination of private and common open space
areas. Common open space may be distributed throughout the residential component
of the mixed-use development and need not be in a single large area. Common open
space areas may be satisfied by common roof gardens, common recreational/leisure
areas, recreational facilities featuring swimming pools, decks, and court game
facilities. Private open space may be provided for each dwelling unit above the first
floor in the form of a private patio or balcony.
SETBACKS FOR MAIN BUILDINGS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
Minimum distances given, unless otherwise noted. All setbacks from streets to development lots are measured from the ultimate
property line shown on the Master Plan of Highways. Increased side and rear setbacks may be required pursuant to Uniform Building
Code requirements.
Front Build-to-Line
• Abutting public street
20 feet along Bristol Street
10 feet along Baker Street, Century Place, Randolph Avenue, Saint Clair Street
Side
• Abutting a public street
20 feet along Bristol Street
10 feet along Baker Street, Century Place, Randolph Avenue, Saint Clair Street
• Abutting residential zone
20 feet
• All other side property lines
0 feet
Rear
• Abutting a public street
20 feet for Bristol Street
10 feet along Baker Street, Century, Randolph, Saint Clair Street
• Abutting residential zone
20 feet
• All other rear property lines
0 feet
Distance between main buildings
Minimum 10 foot distance between main buildings on the same site.
Distance between accessory structures.
Minimum 6 foot distance between accessory structures and main buildings.
_ 13�_
TABLE A - SoBECA URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
PARKING
(1) Vehicle parking is required either on-site or on another lot within a distance deemed acceptable by the Planning Commission. A
reduction in the vehicle parking requirements shall be determined as outlined in "City of Costa Mesa Procedure for Determining Shared
Parking Requirements." The parking reduction for the mixed-use development project and may be approved in conjunction with the
master plan approval.
(2) Parking spaces shall be specifically designated for nonresidential and residential uses by the use of posting, pavement markings, and
physical separation. The parking area design may include the use of alternative parking techniques such as mechanized stacked parking
systems to satisfy parking requirements, subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. Parking design shall also consider
the use of separate entrances and exits, or a designated lane, for residents, so that residents are not waiting in line behind shoppers or
moviegoers. Parking structures shall be architecturally integrated with the project design.
(3) Parking structures shall be screened from view at street level and include architectural detailing, artwork, landscape, or similar visual
features to enhance the street facade. Screening of parking structure levels above street grade is encouraged through the use of vines or
architectural screening detail that is compatible with the project.
(4) Tandem garages and tandem open parking spaces are uxpressly proh i bi ted.
Nonresidential Component
Commercial or Industrial Uses
Live/Work Units
1. Parking requirements for commercial or industrial uses shall comply with off-
street parking requirements for nonresidential uses in the base zoning district.
See Table 13-89, Nonresidential Parking Standards in the Zoning Code.
2. Parking requirements for live/work units shall be applied as follows:
Live/Work Unit
Tenant Parking
Guest Parking Space
Space (2a)
To 1,000 sq.ft.
l.0 space
.5 space
per unit
per unit
To 2,000 sq.ft.
1.5 spaces
.5 space
per unit
per unit
To 3,000 sq.ft.
2.0 spaces
.5 space
per unit
per unit
Over 3,000 sq.ft.
2.5 spaces
.5 space
per unit
per unit
(i)..lxsrvired Terlrrnr Parkyt�!. No less than one covered, tenant assigned parking
space provided for each unit.
(ii). The application of these parking requirements apply to "permitted" uses in
live/work units. Any conditionally permitted uses may be subject to additional
parking requirements depending on the proposed business activities.
Residential Component
SIGNAGE
TABLE A - SoBECA URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
1. Parking requirements for dwelling units in a mixed-use development shall be
applied as follows:
Dwelling Unit
Tenant Parking
Space (1a)
Guest Parking
Studio/Loft/Bachelor
t.0 space
.5 guest
1 Bedroom
1.5 spaces
.5 guest
2 Bedrooms
2.0 spaces
.5 guest
3 Bedrooms
2.5 spaces
.5 guest
(i)..lssi_grterl Tenam Parking. A minimum of 50 percent of the total number of
parking spaces required for the dwelling units shall be covered, with no less than
I covered assigned parking space being provided for each dwelling unit.
A Planned Signing Program is required. Total area of all freestanding signs may not exceed 50% of total allowed sign area per street
frontage pursuant to the City's Sign Ordinance.
II Building Wall Sign Wall signs shall not exceed one square foot of sign area for each linear foot of ��
building frontage or portion thereof.
11 Freestanding Sign I Maximum 7 feet in height including the base. II
II Freestanding Sign along Bristol Street andI Maximum 25 feet in height including the base.
Baker Street
Total area of all freestanding signs may not exceed 50% of total allowed sign area
11 1 per street frontage pursuant to the City's Sign Ordinance.
POOLS AND SPAS
IIAbove -ground pools and spas shall not be located in the required front setback from a public street and are subject to rear and side yard !�
setbacks for main structures. Additional setbacks may be applicable pursuant to Uniform Building Code requirements. l
PROJECTIONS (Maximum depth of projectionsgiven)
Roof or Eaves Overhang; Awning 2 feet 6 inches into required side setback or building separation area.
5 feet into required front or rear setback.
Open, unenclosed stairways. 2 feet 6 inches into required setback area.
Chimneys 2 feet above maximum building height.
Fireplaces 2 feet into required setback or building separation area
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Common Interest Developments Required. Exception: Small lot, single-family detached common -interest developments are not
permitted.
Window Placement Window placement should take into account surrounding land uses. Clerestory windows should
be used in areas where there are privacy or view concerns.
Building Materials A variety of building materials shall be incorporated into the design of the exterior elevations.
Mechanical Ventilation All units shall be mechanically ventilated.
_is_
TABLE A - SoBECA URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
Residential Noise Levels
1. Residential interior noise levels must be met for interior residential living spaces. Residential
exterior noise levels must be met on all private patios, upper-story decks, and balconies.
However, residential exterior noise levels do not need to be satisfied on roof-top decks/terraces
or in common open space areas.
2. Noise study required with project application to document onsite noise levels from
surrounding land uses.
Onsite Private Recreational
Provision of onsite private recreational facilities that are designed for the anticipated
Facilities
demographic profile of the residential development.
Garage
Garages are required to be used for vehicle storage.
Notice
In conjunction with the sale of any unit, adequate notice shall be given of the existing
surrounding industrial land uses, including operational characteristics such as hours of operation,
delivery schedules, outdoor activities, noise, and odor generation.
2%!'Clll[CCIL71'ai Di'til�-n f_ill3llL'IiI1C�,
1 _'%r -hi cleyati��rtti.w_ ith_em_ plta_s_'€_ti_crn i'rcnnt elcvat iolts and stnwl-f tcin�
elevations:
a] B LI i I d i ng clevations should te:rturc St CPJIin Heroes both horizontal) y and
verircaliv to Iden and pi•ovidc appropriate transitions atnong xcond-qg[y
thrc4=tiLury and tour-stol clevutions,
b) Bulldlne elevations should incomorate enhanced dctadiR& which may 1ncludl
articuilatio ttti; p (,)iections, find use of varied byiIding tllatgrial5.
Arc hitecttiral pro = report% are eneoura e'd to troyidc visual fele s an eI"nil a_3ize
so ine: asps t t_L>rdes ig_n such as wtenina y or rnajor window.
d1 Lone. unbroken building facades should be avoided, and variety should be
accontplished through variation in building heights and lirrms.
2. Distinct architectural treatment and varying surface InateriFlivfirtish[
_amonb_thc
ditlemnI units of a pro sett mutt's-story dcyelsaprneru slsuuld be prnvidcq.l.
3. Siynitican t devjai ions fame the originally-approved calor valcue and materials for the
Evroic ct should not be a 7pioyed unle s'ti a tnwsler 121an aInen L117IL."Itt Is ITrocessed aIId
approved by the Planning Commission.
Otlicr PpIicab le Mvelapment
'fltc mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan provides additional development standards related to
Standards
live/work develn mens and residgIIinI loci (level o me-11t. tewr deveIo rrttcrit standards for these
lypL^s Of uses shall hr aPill iUhle tit the 5oBECA Urban Plan.
Prohibited Uses
The use of IiveJ%vork units ani residential Io[Is %viihin an urban master 2 1 an pn)9=L shrill
expressly exclude short-tenn vacation rentals, boanl R care facilities, and boarding houses.
The work spa"s in a Iiveiwork urtit:haII not function as a bed ro nt and shall have bat Itrooln
facilities limiter[ to a bathr(mm with a toilet and sink only: incl shower faciIiIim or full hath
facilities are alIowcd in the work sauce area).
Exhibit 2:
SP -05-07 Al: 19 West Urban Plan
TABLE A - 19 WEST URBAN PLAN
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD
Deviations from development standards may be granted through the master plan
approval process with consideration to existing development configuration,
compatibility of adjacent uses, inclusion of pedestrian -oriented space, and/or inclusion
of amenities along the street side.
Maximum Floor Area Ratio for mixed-use
development project (including residential
uses)
• Commercial Base Zoning District
1.0 FAR
• Industrial Base Zoning District
1.0 FAR
Minimum Floor Area Ratio for
nonresidential component of development
• Commercial Base Zoning District
0.15 FAR
• Industrial Base Zoning District
0.175 FAR
Overall Maximum Building Height for
4 stories/ 60 feet
Mixed -Use Project
(Roof gardens/terraces in mixed-use development projects shall not be considered a
story.
• Max. Building Height for
2 stories/ 40 feet
Nonresidential Component:
Max. Building Height for Residential
4 stories/60 feet
Component:
Lofts, as defined in Section 13-6 of the Zoning Code, without exterior access and
having only clerestory windows will not be regarded as a story.
Minimum Lot Size
Minimum One Acre
Exception: Development lets of Iess than one acre may be allowed as a deviation
From 's M u'rement provided thy I all other develo pincm standards are met.
Attics
Attics shall not be heated or cooled, nor contain any electrical outlets or operable
windows. Attics above the maximum number of stories shall be an integral part of the
building roofline and not appear as an additional story on any building elevation.
Windows in any attic space above the maximum number of stories shall be incidental
and limited to a dormer style.
Maximum Lot Coverage
90%
- Iq-
TABLE A - 19 WEST URBAN PLAN
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
Minimum Open Space
Development Lot:
Minimum 30%open spacc wguired. O'his mmunum olun s1aaLl I'ulull'clnent strictly
ar)pl4_N to the overall deyelowni rat lot area at grade._ I-Igmewr, the sejutre: rout tr c_o '
roof&cks may be partially counted towards the minimum open space reuuirement by
a maximum 10 iyrceent allowance.]
itrxt 01 i es ti th e ovwA
• 14!9 in ...I U.., 10"; Open
Residential Open Space:
Minimum 200 sqA. per dwelling unit of residential component
(This Muiremcntdoes nQt_apply to live/work units
Residential open space may be any combination of private and common open space
areas. Common open space may be distributed throughout the residential component
of the mixed-use development and need not be in a single large area. Common open
space areas may be satisfied by common roof gardens, common recreational/leisure
areas, recreational faci I ities featuring swimming pools, decks, and court game
facilities. Private open space may be provided for each dwelling unit above the first
floor in the foram of a private patio or balcony.
FRONT BUILD -TO -LINE AND SETBACKS FOR MAIN BUILDINGS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
Minimum distances given, unless otherwise noted.
All setbacks from streets to development lots are measured from the ultimate
property line shown on the Master Plan of Highways.
Increased side and rear setbacks may be required pursuant to Uniform Building
Code requirements.
Front Build -To -Line
• Abutting public street
Build -To -Line of •l+W 15 feet along all public streets
Side Setback
• Interior
0 feet
• Abutting a public street
10 feet along Anaheim Avenue, Industrial Way, Monrovia Avenue, Placentia
Avenue, Pomona Avenue, Superior Blvd., Victoria St., W. 161h Street, W. 17th
Street, 5 feet for all other streets
• Abutting a publicly -dedicated alley
5 feet
• Abutting residential zone
20 feet
- Iq-
TABLE A - 19 WEST URBAN PLAN
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Rear Setback
• Abutting a public street
10 feet along all public streets
■ Abutting residential zone
20 feet
• All other rear property lines
0 feet
Distance between main buildings
Minimum l0 foot distance between main buildings on the same site.
Distance between accessory structures.
Minimum 6 foot distance between accessory structures and main buildings.
PARKING
(1) Vehicle parking is required either on-site or on another lot within a distance deemed acceptable by the Planning Commission. A
reduction in the vehicle parking requirements shall be detennined as outlined in "City of Costa Mesa Procedure for Determining
Shared Parking Requirements." The parking reduction for the mixed-use development project and may be approved in conjunction
with the master plan approval.
(2) Parking spaces shall be specifically designated for nonresidential and residential uses by the use of posting, pavement markings,
and physical separation. The parking area design may include the use of alternative parking techniques such as mechanized stacked
parking systems to satisfy parking requirements, subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. Parking design shall
also consider the use of separate entrances and exits, or a designated lane, for residents, so that residents are not waiting in line behind
shoppers or moviegoers. Parking structures shall be architecturally integrated with the project design.
(3) Parking structures shall be screened from view at street level and include architectural detailing, artwork, landscape, or similar
visual features to enhance the street facade. Screening of parking structure levels above street grade is encouraged through the use of
vines or architectural screening detail that is compatible with the project.
Tandem gyrra es and tande n o gn parkin • s ccs are ex prussly VMbibited.
Nonresidential Component
Commercial or Industrial Uses
1. Parking requirements for commercial or industrial uses shall comply with off-
street parking requirements for nonresidential uses in the base zoning district.
See Table 13-89, Nonresidential Parking Standards in the Zoning Code.
—2-0—
Residential Component
SIGNAGE
TABLE A -19 WEST URBAN PLAN
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
1. Parking requirements for dwelling units in a mixed-use development shall be
applied as follows:
Dwelling Unit
Tenant Parking
Space (13)
Guest Parking
Studio/Loft/Bachelor
LO space
.5 guest
I Bedroom
1.5 spaces
.5 guest
2 Bedrooms
2.0 spaces
.5 guest
3 Bedrooms
2.5 spaces
.5 guest
(t a). d gigned Tenant Parkin. A minimum of 50 percent of the total number
of parking spaces required for the dwelling units shall be covered, with no less
than 1 covered assigned parking space being provided for each dwelling unit.
A Planned Signing Program is required. Total area of all freestanding signs may not exceed 50% of total allowed sign area per street
frontage pursuant to the City's Sign Ordinance.
II Building Wall Sign I Wall signs shall not exceed one square foot of sign area for each linear foot of II
building frontage or portion thereof.
Freestanding Sign along Placentia Avenue, Maximum 25 feet in height including the base.
Pomona Avenue, Anaheim, Avenue,
Superior Blvd., 19`h Street, 171h Street
II Freestanding Sign along all other publicI Maximum 7 feet in height including the base II
streets
Total area of all freestanding signs may not exceed 50% of total allowed sign
11 1 area per street frontage pursuant to the City's Sign Ordinance. 11
POOLS AND SPAS
IIAbove -ground pools and spas shall not be located in the required front setback from a public street and are subject to rear and side yard II
setbacks for main structures. Additional setbacks maybe applicable pursuant to Uniform Building Code requirements.
II PROJECTIONS (Maximum depth of protections given) II
Roof or Eaves Overhang; Awning 1 2 feet 6 inches into required side setback or building separation area.
5 feet into required front or rear setback.
Open, unenclosed stairways. 2 feet 6 inches into required setback area.
Chimneys 2 feet above maximum building height.
Fireplaces 2 feet into required setback or building separation area
TABLE A - 19 WEST URBAN PLAN
MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
.'rl'Cline[:ELIraI ]ae,l n Guideline%
I- Architectural cieyatkons with emphasis on front cleyatiOn3 tnld strCd-faci nL
ulevaltkons;
;I)_ 13uildin ele .%tions •hnuld Itature sle in tbnrn% both horizontal) and vertically to
(alleti and nrovidc al pnipriate tran,ilions almun&A,,cimd-gloary thrr a -stoat curd four-
staiy elevations.
b) Building elevations should inculTxarateenhanced demising, which may include
articulations, prop ctlons, and u,e or vaized bulldi ng urucrtal,.
e] Architectural pririw(ions am encouraged to ISrovide visulil fixus and emphisire owe
a, x-ci of dgsi 'n such as an en[Eyway or ttlamor window..
dl Long, unbroken budding facades, should bg avoided..ind variety should be
accrnnplished through variation io building heights incl fornix.
? Distinct archilectu aI treutment and va nl surface materlal"V(In lshes among the
different units ora ttrarxlscd multi-st(adeyelopment should be nn1ViLICd.
3. Significant deviafions From the originally -approved color palette, and materials for the
proiecl should not be ayyroved unless a master plan anncnolnunt is rn'occsstd and approved bv_
the Planning Commission.
Common Interest Developments
Required.
Exception: Small lot, single-family detached common -interest developments are not permitted.
19" Street Frontage Requirement
Lots abutting the rear of properties that have frontage on W. 19" Street shall be considered to
create a resultant parcel with frontage on W. 19" Street prior to approval of any mixed-use
Master Plan for such properties.
Othcr Applicable DeveloLnc:rlt
The_Mesa West Bluffs Urb ul Plan provides additional related to
Standards
Iive/work development and reside vtial loft development. "fhc+c; dcvcIopinctnt standanls For these
types of uses shall be applicable to the 19 West Urban Plan.
Prohibited Uses
lite use of Iivo iwork units asci nniiclen tial lotis within an urban master %Llan nm�cx l shall
CXnre�ssly exclude short-lerna vacation rentals, huard $ care racililies, and bmirding houses.
11aa work spaces in u Iivclwork unit shall not function a, a bcdnxttn and ,hall have bathroom
facilities limited to a bathroom with a toilet and sink only; (no shower facilities or full bath
tagilltiys are allows d in the work Space aural.
Z2—
Exhibit 3:
SP -05-08 A2: Mesa West Urban Plan
-2S-
Table Al:
LiveMork and
Residential Standards
TABLE Al:
LIVE/WORK AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(See also additional development standards specific to live/work developments [Table A2] and residential development [Table A3].)
MESA WEST BLUFFS URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
Minimum Lot Size
Minimum One Acre
Exception. Develo mens lets of less than one acre may he allowed tts a
1.1C4 iation from this requirement provided that all other develonmolt standards
are met.
Overall Building Height
Maximum 4 stories/ 60 feet
1. Roof gardens/terraces shall not be considered a story.
2. Lofts, as defined in Section 13-6 of the Zoning Code, without exterior access
and having only clerestory windows will not be regarded as a story.
Attics
Attics shall not be heated or cooled, nor contain any electrical outlets or operable
windows. Attics above the maximum number of stories shall be an integral part
of the building roofline and not appear as an additional story on any building
elevation. Windows in any attic space above the maximum number of stories
shall be incidental and limited to a dormer style.
Bluff Top Setback
No building or structure closer than 10 feet from blufTcrest (see Section 13-34
Bluff -Top Development)
Distance between main buildings
Minimum 10 foot distance between main buildings on the same site.
Distance between accessory structures.
Minimum 6 foot distance between accessory structures and main buildings.
POOLS AND SPAS
Above -ground pools and spas shall not be located in the required front setback from a public street and are subject to rear and side
yard setbacks for main structures. Additional setbacks may be applicable pursuant to Uniform Building Code requirements.
PROJECTIONS (Maximum depth of projections given)
Roof or Eaves Overhang; Awning 2 feet 6 inches into required side setback or building separation area.
S feet into required front or rear setback.
Open, unenclosed stairways. 2 feet 6 inches into required setback area.
Chimneys 2 feet above maximum building height.
Fireplaces 2 feet into required setback or building separation area
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Common Interest Developments
Required for all residential or live/work developments.
Window Placement
Window placement should take into account surrounding land uses. Clerestory
windows should be used in areas where there are privacy or view concerns.
Building Materials
A variety of building materials shall be incorporated into the design of the
exterior elevations.
72-A_
TABLE Al (Continued)
LIVE/WORK AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(See also additional development standards specific to live/work developments [Table A2] and residential development [Table A3].)
MESA WEST BLUFFS URBAN PLAN
Mechanical Ventilation
All units shall be mechanically ventilated.
Residential Noise Levels
L Residential interior noise levels must be met for interior residential living
spaces. Residential exterior noise levels must be met on all private patios, upper -
story decks, and balconies. However, residential exterior noise levels do not
need to be satisfied on roof -top decks/terraces or in common open space areas.
2. Noise study required with project application to document onsite noise levels
from surrounding land uses.
Onsite Private Recreational Facilities
Provision of onsite private recreational facilities that are designed for the
anticipated demographic profile of the residential development.
Garage
Garages are required to be used for vehicle storage.
Tandcm &a'ugcs and tandern open pparking spans .ire exVrescly prop iud.
-CH�Fli-�ca'F mge4 .n.;.-,- ygNfi-Hi
, -K.t9�.ti.1y Ft- -i}3it,F{,A�,:IEHY+�i-is��"•;
U dit 10 fiwi Witi
RF9il Ill--Kyo4a IF em p clang spae ='
Notice
In conjunction with the sale of any unit, adequate notice shall be given of the
existing surrounding industrial land uses, including but not limited to,
operational characteristics such as hours of operation, delivery schedules,
outdoor activities, noise, and odor generation.
Archit eturll Dcsign Guidelines
I . Archilectural eleval ioti itis crit 11usis on front elevations and st1•ttiI-
facing elevations:
a) Building elevations sliould feature stepping firms ixlth
horizorltall y and vert igII y to soften anti providea ppawri[i[t
ter sitit»ssnxong econd[ story, throu-snlry and tour -story
elevations.
bl Bit iIdlng, cIVYations should inco )orate enhSnceel detailing, which
[i1LiY11CIUde articy Iations, pl'lllCCIitMS, 411d llseell Varicd buiIdln�;
materials
c) Archite eturaI pro iLytions the encoursgcd to provide visual focus
a ltd cillph as1Ze sonic; aSPCCt of &Sigll SLI Ch as all elft way or
1111tior Window.
d)_ Lan- ttnbroken building facades should br avoided. and variety
shouI(I he accomplished IIIIQUgll v_tsriatiun iit building hciglits and
forms.
2. Distinct architectural treatment andvarying surface muccriaIs, Iinishes
a morm the di tfereni units ol'a pm owed mu Iti-story deve:lo 1,]] 110t1
should be orovlded
Sign ificant deylantins II•e1111 ilia ork"iIIaIIy-ayore1yed color NI Lite and inaterials
for the proicvt should not l>e_ 1pproved unle-m a master plan amendment is
provessW and approved by the PIanningCoal mission,
Other Applicable Deis lopmem 5talndarls
The Mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan emphasizes live/work units or residential
kli)keI f-1s�&i ew
development. If other types of mixed-use development is proposed (i.e. vertical
mixed-use development with groundfloor retail and upperfloor residential units),
refer to the 19 West Urban Plan or SoBECA Urban Plan for relevant mixed-use
development standards.
Prohibited Uses
I71e use of Iive/work utsits and residential Iotbs w_ithi_n_ stn urb<nt master at
prolccI shad expressly_CxcluCIC short-term vacation rentals, bmird & cast:
tiwiIitius, and boarding houses.
Tier work sngves in a live/work unit shall not function as it betiroom and ,hail
have bat 11I'MI11 facilities limited to a hathrlonl with a toilet and sink o 11 Y • t no
shower facilities or full bath tklCiIitlCS are allowed in the work spa CC area)
DEVIATIONS
Deviations from development standards may be granted through the master plan
approval process with consideration to the inclusion of on-site and off-site
amenities which may justify the deviation. See Page 10 of Urban Plan.
- 2[0�
Table A2:
LiveMork Standards
TABLE A2:
LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MESA WEST BLUFFS URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
(See also Table AI for additional live/work development standards).
M:.,;..,.''FRT ..t gw-,e
NoR
Minimum Size of Work Space
250 square feet
*(Work space excludes bathroom, kitchen, balcony/mezzanines, and/or
hallway areas.)
Maximum Floor Area Ratio for mixed-use
development project (e.g. live/work units)
• Commercial Base Zoning District
1.0 FAR*
• Industrial Base Zoning District
1.0 FAR*
*LWPORTANT NOTE: The overall density/intensity of proposed development
is dependent on many factors and not solely the maximum allowable FAR. For
example, the FAR and vehicle trip generation work in concert to ensure that the
proposed development does not exceed the capacity of the General Plan
circulation system. Therefore, the maximum allowable FAR may be lower than
1.0 FAR, depending upon the capacity allowed by the General Plan circulation
system. Additionally, site plan layout, parking requirements, and building
design are other important variables. See page [ 15#} for more discussion.
Development Lot Coverage
Maximum 90%
Open Space of Development Lot
Nllili11111111 30% 000 Space requilyd- lTllis milllninlIl Loen 4nace "Uirenicllt
strictly akiplics to the overall developingnt lot area at amide. 1•l0wrrvM tlu Square
Rwtagg of roof dee ks may be rartialIY counIcy I towards the: minimum oltctia space
retluirenient by a maxiinunl 10 pc�enI aIlowatice.)
s
dWYe I0PF[4-1+"0t-i1F0i1-Fifid ' f}L►-Fiflt--FF}Bli3flc-i�izne'reriiii Fif(-tii3k3�i-iFti-tl i "F Fiir1F
IiHiE'FlfiiE 4; �tlH••.., ••.. ._i'.L.. ki)
FRONT BUILD -TO -LINE AND SETBACKS FOR MAIN BUILDINGS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
Minimum distances given, unless otherwise noted. All setbacks from streets to development lots are measured from the ultimate
property line shown on the Master Plan of Highways. Increased side and rear setbacks may be required pursuant to Uniform
Building Code requirements.
Front Build -To -Line
• Abutting public street
Build -To -Line of 15 4-0 feet along all public streets
Side Setback
• Interior 0 feet
• Abutting a public street 10 feet along Whittier Ave., Wallace St., Placentia St., Pomona Ave., Anaheim
Ave., W. 16th St., W. 171 St., W. 18th St., and W. 201h St.
5 feet for all other streets
• Abutting a publicly -dedicated alley
5 feet
• Abutting residential zone
20 feet
TABLE A2 (continued)
LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MESA WEST BLUFFS URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(See also Table Al for additional live/work development standards).
Rear Setback
• Abutting a public street 10 feet along all public streets
• Abutting residential zone 120 feet
• All other rear property lines 0 feet
PARKING
1. Vehicle parking is required either on-site or on another lot within a distance deemed acceptable by the Planning Commission.
A reduction in the vehicle parking requirements shall be determined as outlined in "City of Costa Mesa Procedure for
Determining Shared Parking Requirements." The parking reduction for the mixed-use development project and may be approved
in conjunction with the master plan approval.
2. Parking spaces shall be specifically designated for tenants and guests of live/work units by the use of posting, pavement
markings, and physical separation. The parking area design may include the use of alternative parking techniques such as
mechanized stacked parking systems to satisfy parking requirements, subject to review and approval by the Planning
Commission. Parking design shall also consider the use of separate entrances and exits, or a designated lane, for residents, so that
residents are not waiting in line behind shoppers or moviegoers. Parking structures shall be architecturally integrated with the
project design.
3. Parking structures shall be screened from view at street level and include architectural detailing, artwork, landscape, or similar
visual features to enhance the street facade. Screening of parking structure levels above street grade is encouraged through the use
of vines or architectural screening detail that is compatible with the project.
d. 'randeYrn Laragew and mndem ope•rt parking spiex., are exM-,slv prohibited.
TABLE A2 (continued)
LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MESA WEST BLUFFS URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(See also Table Al for additional live/work development standards).
t. Parking requirements for live/work units are based on the type of
Live/Work Units commercial/industrial activities conducted in the work space. Additional
parking may be required for higher intensity live/work units compared to those
units which function as home businesses. Transportation Services Division shall
determine the appropriate parking rates to be applied to live/work development
on a case-by-case basis, depending on the allowable uses.
Minimum parking requirements for live/work units (with similar function to
home occupations) shall be applied as follows:
Live/Work Unit
Tenant Parking
Guest Parking Space
Space (2a)
To 1,000 sq.ft.
1.0 space
1.5 space
per unit
per unit
To 2,000 sq.ft.
1.5 spaces
1.5 space
per unit
per unit
To 3,000 sq.ft.
2.0 spaces
1.5 space
per unit
per unit
Over 3,000 sq.ft.
2.5 spaces
1.5 space
per unit
per unit
i. At signed Tenam Parking. No less than one covered, tenant assigned parking
space provided for each unit.
ii. The application of these parking requirements apply to "permitted" uses in
live/work units. Any conditionally permitted uses may be subject to additional
parking requirements depending on the proposed business activities.
-30'
TABLE A2 (continued)
LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MESA WEST BLUFFS URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(See also Table A! for additional live/work development standards).
SIGNAGE
A Planned Signing Program is required. Total area of all freestanding signs may not exceed 50% of total allowed sign area per
street frontage pursuant to the City's Sign Ordinance.
Building Wall Sign
Wall signs shall not exceed one square foot of sign area for each linear foot of
building frontage or portion thereof.
Freestanding Sign along Whittier Ave.,
Maximum 25 feet in height including the base.
Wallace St., Placentia St., Pomona
Ave., Anaheim Ave., W. 161h St., W.
171h St., W. lit" St., and W. 201h St
Freestanding Sign along all other public
Maximum 7 feet in height including the base
streets
Total area of all freestanding signs may not exceed 50% of total allowed sign
area per street frontage pursuant to the City's Sign Ordinance.
Table A3:
Residential Development
Standards
TABLE A3:
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
NIESA WEST BLUFFS URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(Please see also Table AI or additional residential development standards.)
Density
Maximum 13 units per acre
Development Lot Coverage
Maximum 60 percent of total lot area
Open Space
Development Lot:
Minimum 40 percent of total lot area
Residential Open Space:
Minimum 200 sq.ft. per dwelling unit of residential component
(This requirement does not apply to live/work units)
Residential open space may be any combination of private and common open space areas.
Common open space may be distributed throughout the residential component of the
mixed-use development and need not be in a single large area. Common open space areas
may be satisfied by common roof gardens, common recreational/leisure areas, recreational
facilities featuring swimming pools, decks, and court game facilities. Private open space
may be provided for each dwelling unit above the first floor in the form of a private patio or
balcony.
FRONT BUILD -TO -LINE AND SETBACKS FOR MAIN BUILDINGS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
Minimum distances given, unless otherwise noted. All setbacks frorn streets to development lots are measured from the ultimate
property line shown on the Master Plan of Highways. Increased side and rear setbacks may be required pursuant to Uniform
Building Code requirements.
Front Build -To -Line
• Abutting public street
Build -To -Line of 40-15 feet along all public streets
Side Setback
• Interior
0 -foot setback on interior property lines if structure is non habitable
10 -foot setback if structure is habitable.
• Abutting a public street
10 feet along Whittier Ave., Wallace St., Placentia St., Pomona Ave., Anaheim Ave., W.
16" St., W. 17" St., W. 18'h St., and W. 20" St.
5 feet for all other streets
• Abutting a publicly -
dedicated alley
5 feet
• Abutting residential zone
l0 feet
Rear Setback
• Abutting a public street
10 feet along all public streets
• Abutting residential zone
10 feet
• All other rear property lines
5 feet
TABLE A3 (continued)
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MESA WEST BLUFFS URBAN PLAN
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
(Please see also Table AI for additional residential development standards)
Parking
Residential parking requirements shall be applied pursuant to Section 13-87, Chapter VI,
Off-street Parking Requirements, of the Zoning Code. An exception is made for residential
lofts where the following parking requirements are applied:
Residential Lott Parking RMuirements:
1. 1,000 square feet or less in size: l covered space and 0.5 guest space
2. More than 1,000 square feet in size: 2 covered spaces and 0.5 guest space
Location criteria
1. Residential projects should be located in proximity to existing residential
neighborhoods.
2. For residential projects that are proposed in a predominantly industrial area,
the following design considerations should be applied:
i. Project design should be "urban loft" in character in both exterior and
interior design.
ii. Roof -top decks are encouraged.
iii. Orientation of living areas including patios and decks from abutting
industrial properties.
iv. Units should be oriented towards an internal courtyard, amenities,
and/or recreational area.
Design Guidelines
Compliance with Residential Design Guidelines
_33
Exhibit 4:
SP -05-09 Al: Mesa West Residential Ownership
_3A_,
11DOPT D APPIL 4, 20063
Within the plan area, an applicant may apply for a
density bonus in conjunction with an application to
develop ownership housing pursuant to the
following:
1. Minimum Lot Size Required: If a
property is zoned either R2 -MD or R2 -
HD, a minimum lot size of 1.0 acre is
required to receive any density bonus to a
maximum of 20 units per acre. The intent
of this standard is to encourage lot
consolidation and to improve the overall
design quality of the project. Exception;
Development lots of less than one acre
may be allowed as a deviation from this
requirement provided that all other
.
development standards are met.
2. Rebuilding of Existing Vnits:
a. R2 -MD or R2 -HD Properties:
If the minimum lot size cannot be
met AND the existing number of
units on the lot is 3 or more, then
the existing number of units can
be rebuilt even if it exceeds
the current zoning allowance.
b. R3 Properties: If the existing
density exceeds 20 units per acre
AND the existing number of the
lot is 3 or more, then the existing
number of units can be rebuilt.
Master Plan for Mixed -Use Overlay
Figure 7.• Tlmehnelflnty chart of Muster Plan arocess
The land use regulations contained in this Urban
Plan encourages the following: (1) the conversion
of existing apartments to residential common
interest developments or (2) for the construction
of new common interest developments. These
development projects may only be activated
through an approved Master Plan. The master
plan process is described in Figure 7.
Specific zoning regulations of the Urban Plan
supersede those of the underlying zoning district
(e.g. medium -density residential zone), unless
otherwise indicated.
Proposed development in the Mesa West
Residential Ownership Urban Plan area requires
approval of a master plan pursuant to Title 13,
Chapter II, Planning Applications, of the Costa
Mesa Municipal Code. In accordance with City
procedures, the Planning Commission reviews and
considers master plans. Refer to Section 13-
28(g), master plan, of the Zoning Code regarding
the review process for preliminary master plans
and amendments to the master plan.
A deviation from the Mesa West Residential
Ownership Urban Plan development standards may
be approved through the master plan subject to
specific findings as described in Title 13, Article
11, of the Costa Mesa Zoning Code.
-35, -
MASTER PLAN
SCREENING
BY
PROJECT SUBMITTAL:
Master Plan
Application deemed
complete
Mitigated Negative
Declaration prepared
Public Review period
Application is missing
information
Planning Commission
Public hearings scheduled
Master Plan approved
Master Plan denied
Appeal period observed
Residential Ownership Urban Plan
Timeline:
About 4 months
PROJECT
Week 1
Week 4
Week 5-8
Week 9-11
Week 12-13
If denied, six months
before similar application
can be submitted
Week 14
PAGE 6
ADOPTED APRIL 4, 2005
Within the plan area, an applicant may apply the
following development standards in conjunction
with a Master Plan application to develop
ownership -housing units. These development
standards replace the corresponding development
standards contained in the Costa Mesa Zoning
Code for the R2 -MD, R2 -HD, and R-3 districts.
All other applicable development standards
contained in the Zoning Code shall be applied.
1. Building Height: The maximum building
height is 3 stories/45 feet. Chimneys may
project 2 feet above the maximum building
height.
2. Building Setbacks Abutting Single -Family
Residential Propert : When new construction is
proposed, the buildings shall be setback from
property lines that are shared with single-family
residential properties as follows:
Interior Side Property Lines:
1 story and/or 15 feet or less: 5 feet
2 stories and/or 15-30 feet: 10 feet
3 stories and/or greater than 30 feet:
15 feet
Rear Property Lines:
1 story and/or 15 feet or less: 10 feet
2 stories and/or 15-30 feet: 20 feet
3 stories and/or greater than 30 feet:
25 feet
3. Critical Vacancy Rate: In conjunction with
an application to convert an existing apartment
complex to a residential common interest
subdivision, the City's critical vacancy rate (3%)
for apartments shall not be applied.
4. Parking:
a. Application of Current Parking
Standards The Zoning Code
parking standards shall only be
applied to new construction when
additional units and/or bedrooms
are being added to the
development, when compared to
existing conditions of the
property.
b. Residential Common Interest
Conversions The proposed
conversion of existing apartments
shall not require compliance with
current parking standards,
provided that no additional units
or bedrooms are being added to
the development.
C. Tandem Parking Permitted fee
r'J
slieted Tandem parking in
a garage, carport, or open parking
area is expressly rohibited.
d. Mechanical Lift Parking
Permitted for "covered" tenant
parking requirements in carports
or shared garages.
5. Deviation from Zoninq Code Development
Standards: A Master Plan is required to activate
the zoning provisions of Mesa West Residential
Ownership Urban Plan. An approved Master Plan
will allow new construction that does not fully
meet all the applicable sections of the Zoning
Code and other code standards. Through the
review process, the applicant must demonstrate
why strict compliance with a current Zoning Code
standard is either infeasible or unnecessary for
the proposed project. See "Planning Process" of
this Urban Plan for more information.
Residential Ownership Urban Plan
In exchange for any deviation from any current
P. Orientation of units away from
standard,
the project must provide additional
the street toward interior
amenities such as those listed below:
courtyards.
q. Adequate lighting for security
a.
Shared garages instead of
(beyond parking and driveway
carports for greater security.
lighting required by code).
b.
Compliance with the City's Energy
r. Gates and intercom system for
Star Program for residential
security.
structures.
s. Other amenities that enhance the
C.
Useable open space with
project and the overall
amenities, such as a tot lot.
neighborhood.
d,
Turf areas of sufficient size to
create useable recreation areas.
e.
Community garden areas.
f.
Masonry planters, potted flowers
and shrubs on decks and balcony
flower boxes.
g.
Additional landscape materials
that exceed Zoning Code
requirements in terms of number
or size. For example, exchanging
required 1 -gallon plants for 5 -
gallon plants.
h.
Provision of landscaping that
consists primarily of California
native species.
i.
CC&Rs that require garages to be
used for vehicle storage only.
j.
Awnings, especially along the front
elevations for color and product
definition, and a better facade.
k.
Stamped concrete or decorative
paving at entrances and driveway
intersections.
1.
Meandering rather than straight
sidewalks.
M,
Upgraded windows and exterior
doors for noise reduction and
energy conservation.
n.
Onsite trash enclosures for
projects of 4 units or less.
o.
Concrete slab adjacent to trash
enclosure, or contract for roll -off
trash service so that the trash
truck does not come on site.
`��
PAGE 7
ADOPTED APRIL 4, 2006
New development in the mixed-use overlay
district shall be evaluated for compatibility with
existing development on a case by case basis.
The following considerations shall be
incorporated into the proposed project:
Standard Condition of Approval: For
proposed development adjacent to residentially -
zoned properties that exceeds two stories,
developer shall submit a shade/shadow analysis
prepared by a professional aesthetic consultant.
The conclusions of the aesthetic analysis shall
specifically demonstrate that adequate daylight
plane requirements for the abutting residential
uses are provided.
At the discretion of the Development Services
Director and in consideration of specific site
characteristics, additional or modified
development standards and conditions of approval
may be added to include, but not be limited to,
increased setbacks, increased wall height,
enhanced landscaping, and other appropriate edge
treatments aimed at enhancing the compatibility
of urban infill projects.
As part of the Master Plan approval, a condition
of approval may require that the Covenants,
Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) disclose the
existing noise environment and any odor -
generating uses within and surrounding the
development.
The provision of the CC&Rs that relates to
disclosures will be reviewed/approved by the City
Attorney's office prior to recordation. A
provision to the CC&Rs will also stipulate that any
subsequent revisions to the CC&Rs related to this
issue must be approved by the City Attorney's
office.
A condition of approval may be included which
would require that written notice of the then -
existing noise environment and any odor
generating uses within the mixed-use
development and within a specific radius of the
mixed use development be distributed to any
prospective purchaser or tenant at least 15 days
prior to close of escrow, or within three days of
the execution of a real estate sales contract or
rental/lease agreement, whichever is longer.
The City Attorney's office shall determine the
legal mechanism employed to ensure disclosure of
noise and odor generating uses. For example, if
this disclosure is required as a deed restriction,
it would not need to be included in the CC&Rs.
1. Architectural elevations with emphasis on
front elevations and street -facing elevations:
Building elevations should feature
stepping forms both horizontally and
vertically to soften and provide
appropriate transitions among second -
story, three, -story and four-story
olovn+inna
b) Building elevations should incorporate
enhanced detailing, which may include
articulations, projections, and use of
varied building materials.
c) Architectural projections are encouraged
to provide visual focus and emphasize
some aspect of design such as an
entryway or major window.
d) Long, unbroken building facades should be ' ' ' ' '
avoided, and variety should be
accomnl�s'.� Wd throuah_varia_t_ion in building
heights and forms.
2. Distinct architectural treatment and
varying surface materials/finishes among the
different units of a proposed multi -story
development should be provided.
3. Siqnificant deviations from the originally -
approved color palette and materials for the
project should not be approved unless a master
Dian amendment is orocessed and aDor❑ved by the
Planning Commission
,67 -
Residential Ownership Urban Plan
PAGE 8
Exhibit 5: Architectural Prototypes
(To be attached as Appendix A to each of the Urban Plans)
Ak
IL
�f -
WE
trill elk
Apt
08 .f COIOTJBI StVI:
l
finn�f el fln
'41
y '{
/� L, it = � •
--
1
,V --
v
R &A
I-
Ui 1: f M
og
W-17
1 M. i�7
' _
?i!'e ,lk
��
115�ii�l 14 t li a 51i H' 11
sIlkIL
ll,lllll6ilillllll111111111111 IN
klL t:
low
_ r
�t Ma,:.....'
If
{ IN
aanisn U111Ma1 XTuip
SI
- e;oofl
jtflfllll
till'
�lti .:,�: �Elr! Rei E
Elm
. 14
W. lit Ak��
0-
111, pis
Jr.
FT,
14
37. -
M-Jmw�=—�=56, 4MIW
'oil
P4
Ak
Z-0
MWA
LP
i
p p-
_71
...... . . . . . . .
* lb
lk
it j•4 .11
Ar
fol- A
I
t
I
14
4 '1
+ 1
lFM-
I
,��•••. � iii 3�����.�= �
N l'
-mow AWF—
L
�. ��4r i � � .mac•-rte � I�
ZZ
WA —Fill gd�l�
ROME
til
rw
7"* �
INSIDERS t � 4qq
r.•�. mac._.- w `' .A� .�'. v� 't - _ r :�' -
0
hO
n
i Zl-
-iW-7.
r
l
Ilk,•�y'`F ' �'
low
J
17
yx.
Y x^-
if
SAP
C'
In NIVIE
5
!4
ti
_rte -�� ��,( �• r�
{y.l.
11 tKIIIHII atvil
w
-- - -qw- ._ -
—OWN
Aici
11
io Id ml LN ,o o
vr m 0
xh
ME&
Emb
0—
rte`
��� � -tib•
v. � i �PE
r•.
�3t� 4r� 1
LJ
1.4
�19 .
11110rula ulmaalaw SUM
Ike
'Jw7T*?I!* IW
8
%;lip --.-
,1110d
M*
vow-
- WE-,
OIL
3UHHH111W MIRVIC
f
A
-4MOM ti --L
9_-V
`1
I
Rick
-'1 1. e0 1
Old
11111 fol!"
■.ma w• y
IN
w * • y y • �a�e+ j� I ��.9 101
1a. w�1t11r�a�lrur'��ll Mm [�
.n. •:% S� - ? "_ __ x^r�� '�s !+ !II 0 ' I J
E J♦ J r ► i�.�. w,ry i�` y
9 Y ,mss Y � b, , � ���. �`.�-3e•: s.
+sica� ,y
JAAAAL
� � � ti:.; r _ ' � * r = .F��}z. � 4" chi . •�-
t ,
` � f 1 ����,,,J�. ! � .� s �' ill •k�, 1 !
lunaaic
I I 1111"Illil1 , I I I
t
X11►■ �.
LLmmmmkiWL M
1 l llllijlll�l, k, k i jIF
_ 71tl'
$[ uaaWa
will
t+rrrrY��
' +, "�'� :.� ."iw; :,,ire �,•
W E 1_I�Iagi Igkl iri�I 1 -fill!
0, _ -Lljll��
•! It
�:f_ r
jf
��t
!rE
1
4
avo
V r f ,Nr
. �;�+�i!
+r �
■ "k
AL
U
Wilson
\ y
4.��`,v oc x Capitol Capital m
G Senate a
�h Congress
O� y
Se
Q Governor
Nrctoria
- — _ E Vfctoria
VVesbvard o
c a c Plum
y
a Pine `� y
:a o tY u
C! U
0
y
Oak
z o Oak
> Linden 2 y o
3 a
v7 :2
o a
Grove y a
y �
I = y
20th c 2r7T
i
U
Evergreen
Dogwood
Cedar �
t
Arbor
i
Parkhill
olnnaker
M
n
C�.
,'9�}tta��.
�Brioso Mlaple
Laurel
i7.
v Olive
`1 :'r%• III
Towne
im
19 West Urban Plan
Mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan
a Mesa West Residential Ownership
Urban Plan
Westside --` .
i
) 100 200
/ i -- 03,—
ATTACHMENT 2
C y
Capital
c ..
Senate `v
s y
y � a
3
(L
U) h �
z_.z.,r _
. Harni wa
Cove
Seal
5
Ross
Sur(
such
Knowell
Bay
mr1
Ford
3ernard
ftmer
�V
�ti`a 7jbC� .
4
fid
a
C� r
140
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
1527 Newport Blvd.
Level 1
Now Selling
$824,500*
1,771-1,999 sq. ft.
40
F�]
X
mpg ■�I `�
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value 0
Address 2013-2029 Anaheim Ave
Name Seabright
Status Now Selling
Selling Point $635,500*
Unit Square Footage 1,586 —1,775 sq. ft.
# Units 26
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value ��
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
2075 Placentia Ave.
Brickyard West
Now Selling
Mid $700,000
1,950 sq. ft.
14
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value
—�► I�ilV//l �'
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
oft
if
LEFT ELEVATION
I HC4NMI1
i yrry wr.w
r .roll=.vrtw w.o.a
1 4r ti.h MIXIt
fMLwYlayM
I WAO t4 rwN IMI
NCp Mrnl M[uRa.
1 G�Nvou�q utf..CUMwO
�u.cl u
^�' �•'""'=" ° COSTA MESA
2026 Placentia Ave -
Brickyard East
Now Selling
Under $700,000
1,717 sq. ft.
15
REAR ELEVATION
17 ]
PERSPECTIVE
I
ELEVATIONS
3
RIGHT ELEVATION
BRICKYARD LOFTS. 14 UNITS
35 0 4 B 16
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value 0 —
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
1677/1695 Superior Ave.
Superior Pointe
Now Selling
Upper $700,000
1,941-1,999 sq. ft.
49
0
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value
0
"
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
2070 Maple Ave.
Poet's Place
Now Selling
$650,000 — $665,000
1,721 sq. ft.
6
t �
AIN —
I"
LIN � I�
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value — 6q—
Address 1042 W. 18`h St.
Name Sea House
Status Sold Out
Selling Point Upper $500,000 - $800,000
Unit Square Footage 1,587 — 1,796 sq. ft.
# Units 33
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value — �10
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
526 Bernard St.
Bernard Townhomes
Planning Approval
TBD
1,733 — 2,370 sq. ft.
10
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value — -� I r
N
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
1620 —1644 Whittier Ave.
Lighthouse Project
Plancheck
TBD
1,750 — 2,290 sq. ft.
86
aye
s -p'
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
2025 Placentia Ave.
West Place
Now Selling
Mid $600,000
1,445 —1,526 sq. ft.
36
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value — 13.,
7M
Address 671 W. 1711 St.
Name West Gateway
Status Planning Approval
Selling Point TBD
Unit Square Footage 1,670 —1,998 sq. ft.
# Units 177
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value rrq ---
r —W_
Address
1974 Meyer PI.
Name
Cadence
Status
Under Construction
Selling Point
$575,000*
Unit Square Footage
1,422 sq. ft.
# Units
5
'r
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value —�5—'
AMIL-f
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
743 W. 20t' St.
Quattro
Under Construction
$610,000*
1,630 sq. ft.
4
nil Y I , i*TT I :
_ � . rl . � - - tom' _ •li :.�, � .
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
2068 Maple Ave.
Maple Project
Planning Approval
TBD
1,482 sq. ft.
4
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value �� 7—
Address 1672 Placentia Ave.
Name The Boatyard
Status Planning Approval
Selling Point TBD
Unit Square Footage 1,940 —1,994 sq. ft.
# Units 32
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value —79-
16
H %, i i •,Y tx��
wil
4 1 tf
h
`
-aFP Ss�`�
•'•"'_i '•�„
+:� ;
���'� :•tee+f!Sii+3iS�lry1�?���•.
H %, i i •,Y tx��
wil
4 1 tf
Address
Name
Status
Selling Point
Unit Square Footage
# Units
573 — 591 Victoria St.
Maple Crossing
In Plan Check
$600,000
1,660— 1,850 sq. ft.
37
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value CU
Address 1856 Placentia Ave.
Name TBD
Status Planning Approval
Selling Point TBD
Unit Square Footage 1,621 sq. ft.
# Units 5
*Selling Point based on RealQuest value <'8� j ,-.!--
ATTACHMENT 3
GENERAL COMMENTS AT JOINT STUDY SESSION
FROM COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSIONER
Mayor Steve Mensinger
• Roof deck: Supportive of counting the roof decks as open space.
• Require conditions that parking is used for parking.
Mayor Pro Tem Righeimer
• Remove shower and bath on 1 st floor.
• Keep development standards flexible.
• Require color board submission, absolutely in favor; what they present is what they
deliver.
• Not supportive of changing the minimum workspace area.
• Garages: Not supportive of tandem garages.
• Supportive of roof decks counted as a story.
• Not concerned with minimum one -acre lot size deviation, provided that development
project of less than one acre are meeting the development standards.
Councilmember Genis
• Front setback: Expressed understanding for the need to widen the street. Interested in
having an average setback, getting rid of the sheer walls.
• Open space: Some projects look nice; some do not.
• Not supportive of roof decks to be counted as open space.
Concerned with shade and privacy of taller projects.
• Opposed to having color board submissions.
Councilmember Foley
• Pocket Park: Depending on size of the development, make a standard for pocket park.
• Roof deck: Does not support counting roof decks toward open space, not to the full
amount, only a portion of open space.
• Concerns with impact on streetscape, density, parking, architectural features more so
than the color; Does not believe that the color board submission as necessary.
• Require residents to have an actual business in their live/work or change it into a
lifestyle
• The development standards for density bonuses for live/work units but not really being
live/work is a problem.
Chair Rob Dickson
• Color board submission: Emphasized that renderings should look like the actual project
once built.
• Supportive of conditions of approval to ensure that live/work are being used for work
and preventing short-term rentals.
Planning Commissioner Colin McCarthy
• Not interested in mandating or changing the 250 sq/ft vs.500 sq/ft work space
requirement.
A
ATTACHMENT 4
City Council did not direct staff to study any additional land use alternatives.
City Council recessed at 10:50 p.m.
City Council reconvened at 10:59 p.m.
2. PROPOSED URBAN PLAN AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE SOBECA AND
WESTSIDE URBAN PLANS (04:44:20)
Staff report, including a PowerPoint presentation presented by Assistant
Development Services Director, Claire Flynn. (04:44:41)
Public Comments:
Walt Clanton, Costa Mesa, spoke on lots on the Westside; density; and parking
issues. (04:58:10)
Linda Tang, Costa Mesa Affordable Housing Coalition & Kennedy Commission,
recommended 20% set aside for affordable housing. (04:59:53)
Cynthia McDonald, Costa Mesa, spoke on appealing to buyers; and transitional
housing. (05:02:05)
Christopher Otis, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of bikeability and walkability in
the City. (05:03:25)
Mayor Pro Tem Righeimer spoke in support of new restrictions. (05:04:25)
Discussion ensued on live/work space minimum requirements. (05:05:09)
Council Member Foley expressed concern with Table A, #5 — Promote and better
define work space in live/work unit. (05:05:39)
Council Member Genis spoke on live/work space; and the need for bikeability
and walkability committee to review pedestrian connections. (05:07:08)
Discussion ensued on the enforcement procedure for short term vacation and
boarding houses; and enforcement and determination of workspace being used
for offices versus bedrooms. (05:10:31)
Minutes -- Regular Meeting — October 6, 2015 - Page 14
MOVED/SECOND: Mayor Pro Tem Righeimer/Council Member Monahan
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Foley, Council Member Genis, Council Member
Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Righeimer and Mayor Mensinger
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
City Council directed Staff to proceed with an Urban Plan Amendment to amend
the SoBECA and Westside Urban Plans.
3. GENERAL PLAN SCREENING GPS -14-04 FOR PROPOSED 28 -UNIT
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT AT 440 FAIR DRIVE (05:16:44)
Staff report, including a PowerPoint presentation presented by Minoo Ashabi,
Principal Planner. (05:17:02)
Steve Sheldon, Applicant of Sheldon Development, presented a PowerPoint
presentation. (05:22:30)
MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Foley, Council Member Genis, Council Member
Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Righeimer and Mayor Mensinger
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
City Council approved to continue the meeting passed midnight.
Public Comments:
Teresa Drain, Costa Mesa, thanked applicant for the community meetings; spoke
on maintaining current land use element; and requested lower density.
(05:36:40)
Carolyn Van Hosen, Costa Mesa, spoke in favor of the project; substantial
improvement; and complimented design. (05:39:45)
Walt Clanton, Costa Mesa, expressed concern with traffic patterns. (05:41:09)
Corina Bellino, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project; and less traffic trips.
(05:43:24)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — October 6, 2015 - Page 15
ATTACHMENT 5
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MINUTE EXCERPTS FROM THE
MARCH 14, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
REGARDING URBAN PLAN AMENDMENTS
(Public Hearing No. 2)
2. Application No.: SP -05-06 Al: SoBECA Urban Plan; SP -05-07 Al: 19 West
Urban Plan; SP -05-08 A2: Mesa West Urban Plan; SP -05-09
Al: Mesa West Residential Ownership Plan
Applicant: City of Costa Mesa
Site Address: Citywide
Zone: Mixed Use Overlay Zone
Project Planner: Claire Flynn
Environmental Determination:
The project is categorically exempt under Section 15061 (b) (3) (general rule) of the
State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act).
Description: The proposed project involves City -initiated Urban Plan Amendments
to amend development regulations and to provide additional clarification/discussion
related to mixed-use, live/work, and residential development in the overlay zones (as
applicable), for the following Urban Plans:
Description of Urban Plans:
• SP -05-06 Al - SoBECA Urban Plan: The SoBECA Urban Plan establishes
provisions for mixed-use development in the 39 -acre SoBECA plan area. This
area is primarily characterized by light industrial, office, and general commercial
uses and is bounded by Baker Street (north), Bristol Street (east), and SR -73
(west).
• SP -05-07 Al - 19 West Urban Plan: The 19 West Urban Plan area consists of
103 acres of industrial, commercial, and residential uses. The plan area is located
in the Westside, generally along 19th Street, Superior Boulevard, and southeast
of Victoria Street and Placentia Avenue.
• SP -05-08 A2 - Mesa West Urban Plan: The Mesa West Urban Plan area is
approximately 277 acres in size. The plan area is generally located south of
Victoria Street, west of Superior Avenue, and to the City's western and southern
corporate limits.
• SP -05-09 Al - Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban Plan: This overlay plan
area consists of 238 acres of high- and medium -density residential uses. In the
mixed-use overlay zone, applicants with qualified projects may apply for specified
residential development standards/incentives or a density bonus pursuant to an
approved site-specific Master Plan.
Commissioner Andranian recused himself.
Claire Flynn, Assistant Development Services Director, presented the staff report.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chris Bennett, The LAB, stated being
changes except banning the short term
a case by case basis.
The Chair closed the public hearing.
in support of the Urban Plan Amendment
rentals. He suggested looking at them on
Chair Dickson asked if a project requesting short term rentals could still come
forward if there was a prohibition on that use. Ms. Flynn responded no based on
the language that is in the report. The Commissioners would have to modify it by
striking the prohibition.
Staff and Commission discussed allowing short term rentals in the SoBECA area.
Chair re -opened the public hearing.
Mr. Bennett clarified the reason for requesting to not prohibit short term rentals
such as Air B&B.
Chair Dickson suggested to Mr. Bennett to bring his proposal to City Council.
Commissioner McCarthy stated being in support of the Urban Plan Amendments
because the proposal is great. It will be well received by City Council and the
applicant community.
Chair Dickson stated also being in support of the Urban Plan Amendments.
MOTION: Hereby move that the Planning Commission recommend City
Council adoption of Urban Plan Amendments to the SoBECA and Westside
Urban Plans as follows: SP -05-06 Al - SoBECA Urban Plan, SP -05-07 Al - 19
West Urban Plan, SP -05-08 A2 - Mesa West Urban Plan and SP -05-09 Al - Mesa
West Residential Ownership Urban Plan based on the resolution in the staff
report.
Moved by Commissioner McCarthy, second by Chair Dickson.
RESOLUTION PC -16-16 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO THE URBAN PLANS:
• SP -05-06 Al: SoBECA Urban Plan;
• SP -05-07 Al: 19 West Urban Plan;
• SP -05-08 A2: Mesa West Urban Plan;
• SP -05-09 Al: Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban Plan.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Dickson, Mathews, McCarthy, Sesler
Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstained: Andranian
,Sr7_