HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 - CC-4 - Agreement Extensions for Building Safety - 6/21/2016CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: JUNE 21, 2016 ITEM NUMBER: CC -4
4SUBJECT: AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS FOR BUILDING SAFETY & FIRE PREVENTION PLAN
REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES
DATE: APRIL 18, 2016
FROM: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT/
FIRE DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION BY: KHANH NGUYEN, BUILDING OFFICIAL
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: KHANH NGUYEN (714) 754-5604
Khanh.nguyen@costamesaca.gov
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 4 to extend the final term of
Professional Services Agreements (PSAs) approved in FY 2012-2013, for building
safety and fire prevention plan reviews and inspection services, with the companies of
Scott Fazekas & Associates Inc., Bureau Veritas, Melad & Associates, Interwest Group,
and CSG Consultants Inc.
BACKGROUND
The Economic Development & Development Services Department and Fire Department
require the continued use of contract plan check and inspection services in order to
provide building safety services in a timely and efficient manner. The on-going major
projects such as the 250 -unit apartments at 580 Anton, the 240 -unit apartments at 125
E. Baker, Ganahl Lumber, 30-40 Tenant Improvements at South Coast Plaza, along
with several projects of highly complex structural design that are submitted annually, will
continue the need for specialized services into the foreseeable future.
Copies of the PSAs with each of the above firms are attached. The PSAs were
approved in June of 2012 for a one year term with the option to renew for up to four
additional one-year periods, upon mutual agreement of the City and the consultants.
Execution of the attached amendments will exercise the fourth and final extension of the
PSAs. Some of the hourly fee rates have increased to reflect the new Affordable Care
Act provisions. Sufficient funds are proposed in the Economic Development &
Development Services Department and Fire Department Budget.
1
FISCAL REVIEW
The current Preliminary Budget for FY 16-17 includes $150,000 in Fire Department —
Fire Prevention Division, and $351,900 in Economic Development & Development
Services Department — Building Safety Division budgets. Should the Council adopt the
FY 16-17 budget including these amounts totaling $501,900, the appropriate amount
will be budgeted to fulfill the above PSAs.
Consultant services for plan checking and inspections are utilized by the Economic &
Development Services Department/Fire Department on an as needed basis. Most of
the consultant's fee is paid from fees collected by the City for either plan check or
inspections. The consultant's fee is a percentage of the fee collected by the City with
the remaining portion of the fee used to cover administrative and overhead costs of the
City. Therefore, most of the costs of consultant services are fully paid by the project
applicant.
LEGAL AND RISK MANAGEMENT REVIEW
The attached amendments were reviewed by the City Attorney and are "approved as to
form". SB 331 does not apply to the amendments, as they do not fall within the
parameters set forth in Public Contract Code section 22178(a). There are no contract
negotiations involved, and the services either do not fall within the contract areas or are
under the contract value set forth in Section 22178(a). Additionally, Risk Management
has approved all insurance provisions for compliance with City requirements.
CONCLUSION
Use of contract plan check and staffing services continues to be a cost effective means
of providing certain Building Safety services. The use of core City staff supplemented
by contracts for certain Building Safety services is common practice for cities
throughout the State.
KHANH NGUY�N/�BO GARY ARf�YSTRUNG, AICP
Building Offici Economic Development &
Development Service Director/
Deputy CEO
DANIEL A. STEFA STEVE DUNIVENT
Fire Chief Interim Finance Director
2
Attachments:
1/ Amendments #4 to Professional Services Agreements
2/ Amendments #3 to Professional Services Agreements
3/ Amendments #2 to Professional Services Agreements
4/ Amendments #1 to Professional Services Agreements
5/ Professional Services Agreement for Bureau Veritas
6/ Professional Services Agreement for CSG Consultants
7/ Professional Services Agreement for Interwest Group
8/ Professional Services Agreement for Melad & Associates
9/ Professional Services Aareement for Scott Fazekas & Associates
Fife: Bldg Safety PSAs _`I Date: 4/16
ATTACHMENT 1
AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this —day of June, 2016 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
BUREAU VERITAS, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
WHEREAS, the third extension was exercised and expires on June 30, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the fourth and final one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900) in the aggregate. Compensation shall be in accordance with the fee
schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2017.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
I Bureau Veritas
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
BUREAU VERITAS
Signature
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Project Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
"—(C' ` Bureau Veritas
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
REVIEWED BY:
Economic Development & Development
Services Director/Deputy CEO
Fire Chief
Finance Director, Interim
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
_ I Bureau Veritas
WpU VF9
0
Mesa
April 13, 2016
Khanh Nguyen
City of Costa Mesa
Re: Amendment for FY 16/17
Professional Services Fees — Revised
Dear Khanh,
We are pleased to provide BVNA's updated rate schedule for the City of Costa Mesa. Below we
have the existing fees and clearly marked the changes we are requesting.
Existing Fee Schedule: Current
Proposed
Staff Level Classifications Hourly Billinq
Rate*
Hourly Billing Rate*
Combination Building Inspector
$70
$74
Senior Building Inspector (Supervisor)
$75
$79
Chief of Inspection (Manager)
$95
$100
Plans Examiner
$85
$90
Plan Check Engineer
$100
$105
Chief Plan Check Engineer (Manager)
$105
$110
Permit Technician I (entry level)
$50
$55
Permit Technician II
$55
$60
Permit Technician Supervisor/Manager
$65
$70
Office Assistant 1
$45
$50
Office Assistant 11
$50
$55
Office Supervisor/Manager
$55
$60
Assistant Building Official
$95
$100
CASp
$95
$100
Fire Plans Examiner
$95
$100
Fire Inspector
$95
$100
Fire Marshal
$105
$110
Code Enforcement Officer
$65
$70
Sr. Code Enforcement Officer (Supervisor)
$70
$75
Chief of Code Enforcement (Manager)
$75
$80
*Accelerated plan review will be 125% of the fees
shown above
*Overtime will be 125% of the fees shown above. No overtime will
be charged without approval from
the City
Proposed Changes:
Accelerated plan review fees will be negotiated by BVNA and the permit applicant. The estimated fee
will cover the initial review plus one recheck. Beyond two reviews, T&M will be charged at a rate of
$150 per hour.
j
PBUIEIU
We look forward to working with the City of Costa Mesa.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Isam Hasenin, P.E.
Chief Operating Officer
1665 Scenic Avenue, Suite 200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
P. (714) 431-4100
E. isam.hasenin@us.bureauveritas.com
AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this —day of June, 2016 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC., a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
WHEREAS, the third extension was exercised and expires on June 30, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the fourth and final one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900) in the aggregate. Compensation shall be in accordance with the fee
schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2017.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
—to— CSG Consultants, Inc.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Date:
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.
Date:
Signature
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date:
Project Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
Date:
Date:
I ( — CSG Consultants, Inc.
REVIEWED BY:
Economic Development & Development
Services Director/Deputy CEO
Fire Chief
Finance Director, Interim
Date:
Date:
Date:
1-2 — CSG Consultants, Inc.
II /i
Proposed Rate
CSG will mail an invoice at the beginning of every month for services rendered during the previous
month. We do not anticipate the use of sub -contractors for this project. CSG provides pick-up and
delivery of plans as no additional cost. CSG proposes the use of a percentage option based on plan
review fees collected by the City, or compensation utilizing hourly rates.
Percentage I Hourly Rate Schedule
Plan Review Services
Description
Rates
Full Plan Check Services by Percentage ................................ 75% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees
Structural I Mechanical I Electrical I Plumbing
Plan Review by Percentage ........................................... 35% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees
Chief Plan Check Engineer (Manager).............................................................. $100 per hour
Plan Check Engineer............................................................................. $85 - 95 per hour
PlansExaminer...................................................................................... $75 per hour
Building Inspection Services
Chief of Inspection (Manager)...................................................................... $80 per hour
Senior Building Inspector (Supervisor).............................................................. $70 per hour
Combination Building Inspector .................................................... $65 per hour ($60 was old fee)
Building Official Services
Assistant Building Official........................................................................... $100 per hour
Permit Technician Services I Clerical Support
Permit Technician Supervisor/Manager.............................................................. $60 per hour
Permit Technician II................................................................................ $50 per hour
Permit Technician I (entry level).................................................................... $40 per hour
Office Supervisor/Manager.......................................................................... $40 per hour
Office Assistant II.................................................................................... $40 per hour
Office Assistant I.................................................................................... $40 per hour
CASp Services
CASp Consultation................................................................................... $85 per hour
CASp Inspection ................................. .................................................... $85 per hour
Fire Prevention Services
FireMarshal........................................................................................ $95 per hour
Fire Plans Examiner ................................... 85% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees / $85 per hour
FireInspector....................................................................................... $85 per hour
Code Enforcement Services
Chief of Code Enforcement (Manager).............................................................. $80 per hour
Sr. Code Enforcement Officer (Supervisor).......................................................... $70 per hour
Code Enforcement Officer........................................................................... $60 per hour
All hourly rates include overhead costs including, but not limited to, salaries, benefits, Workers Compensation Insurance, office
expenses, etc. Should the scope of work change or circumstances develop which necessitate special handling, we will notify the
City prior to proceeding. Annual adjustments may be mode by mutual agreement based upon current CPI.
C S SS
—1-7-
5
AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this _ day of June, 2016 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
INTERWEST GROUP, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
WHEREAS, the third extension was exercised and expires on June 30, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the fourth and final one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900) in the aggregate. Compensation shall be in accordance with the fee
schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2017.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
—1.4— lnterwest Group
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
Date:
— I S —
Interwest Group
Date:
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
INTERWEST GROUP
Date:
Signature
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date:
Project Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
Date:
— I S —
Interwest Group
REVIEWED BY:
Economic Development & Development
Services Director/Deputy CEO
Fire Chief
Finance Director, Interim
Date:
Date:
Date:
— ( (D Interwest Group
CXh►bi� " A- //
►. _11. s� 1 =- XL=!�J
PLAN REVIEW FEES
We propose the following fee schedule for all services outlined in the RFP. All plan review fees
listed are a percentage of the City's Collected Plan Review Fee.
Building and Safety Plan Review:
✓ 60% for first time check and any required re -checks
✓ 75% for expedited plan check which includes first time review and any required re-
checks with a turn -around time no more than five (5) calendar days.
Grading / Improvement Plan Review:
✓ 70% for first time check and any required re -checks
✓ 85% for expedited plan check which includes first time review and any required re -checks with a turn -around time no
more than five (5) calendar days.
Fire Plan Review:
✓ 60% for first time check and any required re -checks
✓ 75% for expedited plan check which includes first time review and any required re -checks with a turn -around time no
more than five (5) calendar days.
We will perform the number of plan review iterations necessary to obtain approval of each project for the percentage of fee
proposed
There is no char a for courier or shipping services,
HOURLY FEE STRUCTURE
Classification
REVISED
412016
Standard
Hourly Rate
REVISED
412016
Overtime
Hourly Rate
125% of
standard rate
Combination Building Inspector
70
_87
Senior Building InspectorJSupervisor)
81
101
-
Chiefof Inspection (Manager)
—
_
94
- - .._....
117
_
Plans Examiner
--
---------------
88
........... ........---------..._..-._....-
i
110
._... ...........-........
- -...-...._... - - - - ....... ._.......-.........---------------------......._..:---------
Plan Check Enqineer (Managers _ _ _
_i100
- -
- -
-- 125--- -
Permit Technician 1 (entry level)
i
34
I
43
Permit Technician II
46
Permit Technician Supervisor/Mana er
I
56
70
OfficeAssistant 1
i
28
i
35
............--..__...------------------------------- - - -----. ---t-------
Office Assistant II -- - -
!
..._.
-...
33
..............----.....-----
-
42
------...__..-..----- -- - -
- - - - -...-- - -- - -
Supervisor / Manager - -
56
_70 - - - -
-Office
Assistant Building_Official-_-_-____-_-_-___-_ - -
-`
- 94 -
-- --- --
-
-_ 117 - __...._..
CASA._._....-----------
F
99
124
Fire Plans Examiner
99 -------
--- !
124 _
--._:._.......__.._.....- ----------------------____.._.----------------�-----------
Fire Inspector -
88
i-------
110
Fire Marshal
'•;
105
I
132
---------------
...._....-.._.---...-----------------_....------------------------------._._..._._----------.._-.._.-----__.
Code Enforcement Officer
56
70
Sr. Code Enforcement Officer Su ervisor
I
72
Chief of Code Enforcement (Manager)
'
88
....' ..........
_ _90
110
Rates are typically reviewed yearly on July 1 and may be subject to revision unless under specific contract obligations.
Approved Mileage to be reimbursed at IRS rate
Interwest Consulting Group I www.interwestgrp.com
AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this _ day of June, 2016 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
MELAD ASSOCIATES, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
WHEREAS, the third extension was exercised and expires on June 30, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the fourth and final one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900) in the aggregate. There is no change from the last fee schedule.
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2016.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
—149— Melad Associates
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
MELAD ASSOCIATES
Signature
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Project Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
A_ Melad Associates
REVIEWED BY:
Date:
Economic Development & Development
Services Director/Deputy CEO
Date:
Fire Chief
Date:
Finance Director, Interim
Melad Associates
AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this —day of June, 2016 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
WHEREAS, the third extension was exercised and expires on June 30, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the fourth and final one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900) in the aggregate. There is no change from the last fee schedule.
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2017.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
—_Z1 — Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Date:
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Date:
Signature
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date:
Building Official
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Date:
Risk Management
—2-2--
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
REVIEWED BY:
Economic Development & Development
Services Director/Deputy CEO
Fire Chief
Finance Director, Interim
Date:
Date:
Date:
Z3, Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 2
-2-A -
AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this*day of June, 2015 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
BUREAU VERITAS, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the third one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900.00) in the aggregate. There is no change from the last fee schedule.
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2016,
3, All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
-ZS - Bureau Veritas
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY,, �^�OSTA MESA,
A milr%0ai_corporation
Mayor offlhe City of Costa Mesa
0 of "C"',
Ci' of Costa Mesa
BUREAU VERITAS
Date: �0 J'Z (D I l5
Date:
Date: > /.s" / 7-1 s""
Signature
1 '�'%j1,. �-�`- J2•�"t-.���� ��j'� r.'�L,r,.. .✓/ L/! >n •T --`Cep J'
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date:-
Project Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date: 4L)
City Attorney `
—Z(p— Bureau Veritas
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Date: 6-Z,
Risk M agement
REVIEWED BY:
Date: s-
Economic velo ment & De elopment
Services Director/Deputy C
Date: 4D
--Fr Chief
Date: b
Finance Director
— 2-7 — Burcau Veritas
AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK .AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this Oday of June, 2015 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC., a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the third one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900.00) in the aggregate. Compensation shall be in accordance with the
fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference,
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2016.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
—2'3— CSG Consultants, Inc.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
City of Costa Mesa
of the City SfCosta Mesa
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.
t
Signature
l�-1-1y y 17yu,►��- i11 L,� ��;�'4, t�=rte �w"'
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date: �D k, o i IS
Date:
Date: S t >4 /-�' C)'.S
Date:
Project Manager 60
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/C Date: I U
City Attorney
_2n _ CSG Consultants, Inc.
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Date: f
Risk M agement
REVIEWED BY:
Date:
Economic evel ment & D elopment
Services irector/Deputy C O
Date:
Fir hief
Date:
Finance Director
--3o'
CSG Consultants; Inc.
EXHIBIT "A"
CSG will mail an invoice at the beginning of every month for services rendered during the previous
month. We do not anticipate the use of sub -contractors for this project. CSG provides pick-up and
delivery of plans as no additional cost. CSG proposes the use of a percentage option based on plan
review fees collected by the City, or compensation utilizing hourly rates.
Percentage I Hourly Rate Schedule
1
Plan Review Services
Description Rates
*Fee includes initial review and 2 reviews, if necessary, additional reviews will Incur hourly fees
Full Plan Check Services by Percentage ........... . .................... 75% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees
Structural I Mechanical I Electrical I Plumbing
Plan Review by Percentage .......... ................................. 35% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees
Chief Plan Check Engineer (Manager) ........... . ............. ..................................... $100 per hour
Plan Check Engineer .............. . . ............................................................. $85 - 95 per hour
PlansExaminer ..... . .... . ................... . ........... ........................................... $75 per hour
Building Inspection Services
Chief of Inspection (Manager) ...... . ..................................... . ........ . ....... . ..... . .. $80 per hour
Senior Building Inspector (Supervisor).............................................................. $70 per hour
Combination Building Inspector .................................................... $60 per hour ($55 was old fee)
Building Official Services
Assistant Building Official ............. . ...................... . .............. . . ...................... $100 per hour
Permit Technician Services I Clerical Support
Permit Technician Supervisor/Manager......................................... . .. $60 per hour ($50 was old fee)
Permit Technician II ........................................... . .................. $50 per hour ($40 was old fee)
Permit Technician I (entry level) ....................... . .......................... $40 per hour ($30 was old fee)
Office Supervisor/Manager.................. ...................................... $40 per hour ($30 was old fee)
Office Assistant II .................................................... . ... . ......... $40 per hour ($30 was old fee)
Office Assistant I ............ . . ........ . ........ . . . . . .... . ......................... $40 per hour ($30 was old fee)
CASA Services
CASp Consultation................................................................................... $85 per hour
CASp Inspection ................................................ . .............. . . .. $85 per hour ($55 was old fee)
Fire Prevention Services
FireMarshal ................. . ... . .............. . ...... . ..... ....................................... $95 per hour
Fire Plans Examiner . ..... . .. . ..... . . .................. 85% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees / $85 per hour
Fire Inspector .... . ....... . ..................... . .... . ..... . ... . . . ..... . . . ......... $85 per hour ($55 was old fee)
Code Enforcement Services
Chief of Code Enforcement (Manager) ......................... . ..................... . .............. $80 per hour
Sr. Code Enforcement Officer (Supervisor) .......... . .............. ................................. $70 per hour
Code Enforcement Officer ....................................... . ................. $60 per hour ($55 was old fee)
All hourly rates Include overhead costs including, but not limited to, salaries, benefits, Workers Compensation Insurance, office
expenses, etc. Should the scope of work change or circumstances develop which necessitate special handling, we will notify the
City prior to proceeding. Annual adjustments may be made by mutual agreement based upon current CPI.
- 32
AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this [rday of June, 2015 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
INTERWEST GROUP, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the third one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900.00) in the aggregate. Compensation shall be in accordance with the
fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2016.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement,
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in fill force and effect.
Interwest Group
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A munid PhArnoration
Mayor of the pity of Costa Mesa
7X,e
, `- '� -9 / , ,-/r/
EO of the City o Costa Mesa
INTERWEST GROUP
f
Signature
Date: � � 2v � l5
Date: .
Date: S / S / I S
�� �`��w,2�3 . rn ✓�r:� Arm, �L�J� �ia, rw,� ��
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
�-- �----- Date
Project Managed
/f')
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
f"
Date:
City Attorney
—3,1— Interwest Group
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
' Date: I
Risk Management
REVIEWED BY:
Economic velo ent & Deve pment
Services Director/Deputy CEO
Finance 15irector
Date:
t
Date: 5 / / /
Date: 57. v /' �S -
3 s—
fntenvest Group
EXHIBIT "A"
_3(�;_
PLAN REVIEW FEES
We propose the following fee schedule for all services outlined in the RFP
Building and Safety Plan Review:
60% for first time check and any required re -checks
75% for expedited plan check which includes first time review and any
required re -checks with a turn -around time no more than five (5) calendar
days.
Grading 1 Improvement Plan Review:
v 70% for first time check and any required re -checks
85% for expedited plan check which includes first time review and any required re -checks with a
turn -around time no more than five (5) calendar days.
Fire Plan Review:
V 60% for first time check and any required re -checks
V 75% for expedited plan check which includes first time review and any required re -checks with a
turn -around time no more than five (5) calendar days.
We will perform the number of plan review iterations necessary to obtain approval of each project for the
percentage of fee proposed
There is no charge for courier or shipping services.
There is no charge for mileage
HOURLY FEE STRUCTURE
ORIGINAL REVISED
ORIGINAL
REVISED
Classification
Standard 312015
Overtime
312015
Standard
Hourly Rate
Hourly Rate
Overtime
Hourly Rate
Hourly Rate
Combination Building I spector _..___._.__.._.._x.._._._$63.._.__..._...
__..___...._65._._..._.._:.__..._......_79
__.._.._....___..._
81.._......_..-_.
Senior Buildin Ins ector Su ervisoi
73 !
75
91
94
Chief of Inspection Njanae� _ _.__........__.
__.._._._.._85___.__._._x.._.._._.87.._._.
_ .._.._...._.106
i_ __..._.109 _.
Plans Examiner
_.._.._
80 -_.._._...�--_--..__.---._.._..._..._.
82 ':
100
_ _ 103
Plan Check Engineer..(_Mana�ger)
i
i_.._.._._._.__-_...._..
93
113
116
_.._._..__—.x_._._.._..90__.._._...
Permit Technician 1 (entry
.
i 30 I
32
38
_..__...._
39
_level) _
Permit Technician II
i
Permit Technician Supervisor/Manageri
_.-4�.._..._..----..._.._..._._..43_._.._.__.._.._
52
.............
63
.......
Office Assistant I
..._...._.._.._50.- -..._......_....- - -
25�26_
.._..—_...! . -
-.— _......_..._.}_..._...__.._..65
31
.... ..... ...... ..... -
32
_..._...._..._...___,__.._...._..._._..__.._._..----_...._--._..-----._..._.
Office Assistant II
30
_ _{_--
31 i
_._. _._..._._.___t...__-_.__.._..__...-_.
38
3s.
Office Supervisor/ Manager
50 !
52 i
63 _
..... _
65
.__......._.._...-
-- _—
Assistant Buildmg Official_._...._..._.._.
_ _ _ _ _
87... ;
_ .
--106
_,....._..._.._
_. �..__..._._ 109
---._._...._......—.85
CASA
-- - -
' 90 !
92
113
116
__._....._..._..._
Fire Plans Examiner
; 90 I
92
113
•. 116
_...-........._...--..._.__..._..._------- ............._.._..--...___..----.......,_---._...._........�.._.._.._._........
Fire Inspector—�__.....__-801.._..___..82
__,._.._
._ _.. -.
._......-...._._.._.�.-_.._...
_._.100
_ ._..._......_._
__..' 103
Fire Marshal
Code Enforcement Officer
....._....i._. ---.-95..-._._.-. +...____...9$.____.._------_..._1.1.9
i 50 ;
52
.._.._._..i_.._....._..__122_.._._....._
63
65
Sr. Code Enforcement OfficerLSupervisor� i 65
67 :.
81
83
Chief of Code Enforcement (Manager)
80
82
_
100
_ _
103
Rates are typically reviewed yearly on July 1 and may be subject to revision
unless under
specific contract
obligations.
Interwest Consulting Group I AAFw .1nterwestgr,c;oav
AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this 1 01day of June, 2015 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
MELAD ASSOCIATES, a California corporation ("Consultant').
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the third one (1) year extension; and
,A7HEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900.00) in the aggregate. There is no change from the last fee schedule.
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2016.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
—3s— Melad Associates
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Date:
Mayor of th4Cityo kaMesa
Date:
Ctoof Costa Mesa
MELAD ASSOCIATES
r
Aure
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date: — C) f 5 -
�,LCelli Date:
'Project Manager ,l f
APPIZOV AS TO FORM:
�� )P, nf
City Attorney
Date: 1'd U i `i
Melad Associates
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
l�
Risk lviana4ement
REVIEWED BY:
Economic D'pelopfnent & Devejdpment
Services Dif ector/Deputy CEO
:�1,�,14 'lllMJ--
Finance Yirector
—�G
Date:
Date: -/ - /5-
Date:
S
Date: `J / ! 5
Date: 5 d!`/5^
Melad ASSoeiaLBS
AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this Ikkay of June, 2015 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
SCOTT FAZEKA.S & ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation ("Consultant"),
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City ("Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement was for one year with up to four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the second extension was exercised and expired on June 30, 2015;
and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the third one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the maximum compensation set forth in the Agreement needs to be
changed to reflect the amount budgeted for the services to be performed for the extended
term.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Section 2.1 of the Agreement (Compensation) shall be amended to increase
the total not to be exceeded amount by Five Hundred and One Thousand Nine Hundred
Dollars ($501,900.00) in the aggregate. Compensation shall be in accordance with the
fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term through
June 30, 2016.
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
%i ( — Scott Scott Fazekas & Associatcs, Inc.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal oration
Mayor of the tty Costa Mesa
Cifff o the City of os a Mesa
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Signature
Name and Tide
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date: I1�i � s
Date:
Date: f5-�- f _ ')S—
Date:
CV,
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date.
City Attorney
_ 1�2 Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
APPROV D AS TO SURANCE:
Date: J l
Risk anagement
REVIEWED BY:
Date:
Economic De elop nt & Dever pment
Services Di ctor/Deputy CEO
Date:
ghief
Finance birector
Date:
—4'5— Scott huckas & Associates, Inc.
EXHIBIT `dA"
— '1A
PROPOSED FEES 2015-2016
PLAN REVIEW
The traditional approach in preparing plan check fees is to apply a percentage to the revenue
collected by the agency for plan review fees. Using the City's schedule which is based on Table
1-A of the 2001 C,B.O. and 2002 Valuation Data Chart to establish the plan check fee, SFA
proposes to charge eighty percent 80% of the established plan check fee for the scope of work
requested for projects assigned by City and picked up by SFA.
If SFA is reviewing duplicate or identical plans on a project, the proposed fee is ten percent
(10%) of the plan review fee collected after the initial model is checked at the prescribed rate.
When doing Accelerated Plan Review, SFA will charge the applicants seventy-five percent
(75%) of the City's plan check fee since the City collects the balance.
SFA will not charge for rechecks unless the plans are incomplete or revised for which the City
would collect additional fees from the applicant as well. The City would then have the funds to
reimburse SFA. Additional services outside the main scope of review would be charged at a rate
of $100.00 per hour.
Ncyrff FmOrns & Asxtwintcs, bic.
__T5—
ATTACHMENT 3
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this 24th day of June, 2014 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
BUREAU VERITAS, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below ("Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the term of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original Agreement contained a provision for four (4) additional
one (1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and will expire on June 30, 2013
and June 30, 2014, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the compensation for the first extension, covering Fiscal Year 2013-
2014, was in the amount of $536,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the second one (1) year extension for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 ("Second Extension"); and
WHEREAS, the Fee Schedule provided in the original Agreement needs to be
updated for the second one (1) year extension term covering Fiscal Year 2014-2015; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) and
which was decreased to Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) for the
first extension (covering Fiscal Year 2013-2014) needs to be decreased to include the
actual amount budgeted for the second extension in the amount of $311,580 which will
cover Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. The Compensation provided under Paragraph 2.1 of the Agreement shall
be decreased to Three Hundred Eleven Thousand Five Hundred Eighty
-7 — Bureau Veritas
Dollars ($311,580.00) for the Second Extension covering Fiscal Year
2014-2015.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2015, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximum of) additional one (1) —year period at the same terms,
conditions an fee rates herei vided."
two ( )
3. For Fiscal Year 2014-2015, the ee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "A" of the
Agreement shall be replaced with the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "1"
of this Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
4. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
5. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
7 ON"Ll,
AE.Costa Mesa
BUREAU VERITAS
Date:
Date: 1r`1?y/Y
Date:
Si ature
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MRS
Bureau Veritas
Project Manager
APPROVE O FORM:
N Al
City Attrney
Date: L _(A -1�—
Date: —64/4/t/
APPROV AS OINSURANCE:
Date:
Risk agement
Bureau Veritas
—,4q-
Exhibit "1"
Fee Schedule for FY 2014-2015
Bureau Veritas
{
L xh i-�,
} city of Cassa MDSE
_ Building and Fire Pian Check and inspecton
Pricing
�uhding and ; it Pricing
Our nainp reflects our commitment to the sacce-ms oi t:rie City cz Costa Mesa by helpinp you mamtain
signii.cant. q:►ailty and cast savtn�p benefits moving forward. These include:
Reduaed plan roview turnaround times
ImpleTrentation e. established s acimmnic plan review pro; i§es.
Cornrnttmont to rnaaniain a fiexible rate stru=re
Cuslcarr►ized rate options for the City of Co'atti mesa suh as hourly, NTE-, per»ntage ba5ed_ etc.
Highly qualified staff. compensated arrr:rnensurate vft ftir duties and respc rnsib itbes
r Confidence of wonting watttl a well-established consufsant in busilles- foF 180+ yeah
Hourly rates far pmj�act peTsonnol are! outlined belim:
5114dino and Welty SMff
+-lourly nillino
vombination Building Inspector
$70
Senior Building inspe=r (SupeMsor)
$75
GtFia` Of inspection (Managaf)
$95
Plan Chase*: Engineer
$100
Chief Plan Check Engineer (k4anager)
$1U5
PermIl jacf rtician 1 (entry level)
$50
PaTimil Tachnidep 11
$55
- t Flermit Technician S rvVSor/Manager
S55
Office Assistant I
S45
Moe Assistart 11
S'S0
Of e Supervis ar%ana�.er
S55
Assistant Building Cffidial
S95
CkSp
$95
Fire Purrs examiner
$95
Fire lnsp�ector
$95
Fire NI'mrshal
$105
Code cnforoament Office=
$55
Sr. Code Entor:em-an dicer jSupenrisar)
$'0
Ghia, of CD6Et Enforcemen (Manager)
$75
'No rsimbursabW cszstr.
"A-->9ierated Plan Reviews wIF be 1250iv abasic, the feet, shovm
{ •DvvaoUm. wftl lar~ 125`11, aaovc t1r- fee~:. Snawr: f�a DM-U.rr.e wit; ;)e rtj8Tged witbou: appmiaa tmni tr►e Cityk. *Pier, ctteDi; turnamund rimes for iarpt, ar zamp�ax praye ,, May m rwpol led
1
mw r-Dnvrard witty �.c,rGiGa n
4-
City of Ccmta Mesa
Building and Fire Pian Chezk and inspection
Sarnpi:e Pricing
tan Check Percentage Fee Option
Sumac Veritas can offer a permntage fee cvtjo,a to the City of OmwMesa, for plan checc servt to be
performed:
Cornmer-cial Plan Review -
Full Plan Review 8Z,% of the Cityjs code-Lted nomrruside€ttial plan check %"
Residential Plan Review:
Full Plan Review 85% of the City's C lected residential plan Chad* iW
*Pian Review peroentages in: ,ude intttal reviaw and two ra hates. Tbird and subsequent raµbeoks
and Asian cherrges, Dr revisions will be bified .as Time and Materials based on the hoarty r&,.ss shown.
-tee 52— —
M;pw Forvmt— Y.Ith Gcanirae�
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this 24th day of June, 2014 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC., a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below ("Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the term of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original Agreement contained a provision for four (4) additional
one (1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and will expire on June 30, 2013
and June 30, 2014, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the compensation for the first extension, covering Fiscal Year 2013-
2014, was in the amount of $536,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the second one (1) year extension for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 ("Second Extension"); and
WHEREAS, the Fee Schedule provided in the original Agreement needs to be
updated for the second one (1) year extension term covering Fiscal Year 2014-2015; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) and
which was decreased to Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) for the
first extension (covering Fiscal Year 2013-2014) needs to be decreased to include the
actual amount budgeted for the second extension in the amount of $311,580 which will
cover Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. The Compensation provided under Paragraph 2.1 of the Agreement shall
be decreased to Three Hundred Eleven Thousand Five Hundred Eighty
—S-3— CSG Consultants, Inc.
Dollars ($311,580.00) for the Second Extension covering Fiscal Year
2014-2015.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2015, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximum of ) additional one (1) —year period at the same terms,
conditi and ee rates herein provided."
�0 C°2)
3. For Fiscal Year 2014-2015, the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "A" of the
Agreement shall be replaced with the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "1"
of this Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
4. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
5. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Date:
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
74WDate:
CVO of Costa NTesa
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.
Signature
1<HoP� avo11tr VLGr- PR-C-s10E7ni
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date: 6/06/ego 14
�� CSG Consultants, Inc.
"Manager r '-az
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Date: Com- 16-/4/
Date:
APPROVED ;ASTr VSURANCE:
Date: 6 - 16 — l 7
Risk agement
51s- CSG Consultants, Inc.
Exhibit "1"
Fee Schedule for FY 2014-2015
-S(0- CSG Consultants, Inc.
Proposed Rates
En g e ,�-T tt A
CSG will mail an invoice at the beginning of every month for services rendered during the previous
month. We do not anticipate the use of sub -contractors for this project. CSG provides pick-up and
delivery of plans as no additional cost. CSG proposes the use of a percentage option based on plan
review fees collected by the City, or compensation utilizing hourly rates.
Percentage I Hourly Rate Schedule
C5G will mail an invoice at the beginning of every month for services rendered during the previous
month. Compensation can be based on hourly rates or on a percentage fee basis. Hourly fees are listed
as well as the requested proposed percentage fees:
Plan Review Services
Description
"Fee includes initial review and 2 reviews, if necessary,• additional reviews will incur hourly fees
Rates
Full Plan Check Services by Percentage ................................ 75% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees
Structural I Mechanical I Electrical I Plumbing
Plan Review by Percentage..... I ......................... I ........... 35% of the -City's Collected Plan Review Fees
Chief Plan Check Engineer (Manager) ........................... :................................... $100 per hour
Plan Check Engineer............................................................................. $85 - 95 per hour
Pians Examiner...................................................................................... $75 per hour
Building inspection Services
Chief of Inspection (Manager)............................................................ . ......... $80 per hour
Senior Building Inspector (Supervisor) ............... ............................................... $70 per hour
Combination Building Inspector. . ................. .................................................. $55 per hour
Building Official Services
Assistant Building Official........................................................................... $100 per hour
Permit Technician Services j Clerical Support
Permit Technician Supervisor/Manager......................................... . .................... $50 per hour
Permit Technician 11............................................................................... $40 per hour
Permit Technician I (entry level) ........................ ............................................ $30 per hour
Office Supervisor/Manager................................... ....................................... $30 per hour
Office Assistant ll.................................................................................... $30 per hour
Office Assistant I.................................................................................... $30 per hour
CASp Services
CASp Consultation.............................................................................. $85 per hour
CASp Inspection..................................................................................... $55 per hour
Fire Prevention Services
FireMarshal........................................................................................ $95 per hour
Fire Plans Examiner ................................... 85% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees / $85 per hour
Fire Inspector ....................................................................................... $55 per hour
Code Enforcement Services
Chief of Code Enforcement (Manager).............................................................. $80 per hour
Sr. Code Enforcement officer (Supervisor).......................................................... $70 per hour
Code Enforcement Officer........................................................................... $55 per hour
AU hourly rates include overhead costs including, but not limited to, salaries, benefits, Workers Compensation Insurance, office
expenses, etc. Should the scope of work change or circumstances develop which necessitate special handling, we will notify the
City prior to proceeding. Annual adjustments may be made by mutual agreement based upon current CPI.
_�5-7—
Wlf
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this 24th day of June, 2014 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
INTERWEST GROUP, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below ("Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the term of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original Agreement contained a provision for four (4) additional
one (1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and will expire on June 30, 2013
and June 30, 2014, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the compensation for the first extension, covering Fiscal Year 2013-
2014, was in the amount of $536,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the second one (1) year extension for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 ("Second Extension"); and
WHEREAS, the Fee Schedule provided in the original Agreement needs to be
updated for the second one (1) year extension term covering Fiscal Year 2014-2015; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) and
which was decreased to Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) for the
first extension (covering Fiscal Year 2013-2014) needs to be decreased to include the
actual amount budgeted for the second extension in the amount of $311,580 which will
cover Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
The Compensation provided under Paragraph 2.1 of the Agreement shall
be decreased to Three Hundred Eleven Thousand Five Hundred Eighty
— �5 48'_ Interwest Group
Dollars ($311,580.00) for the Second Extension covering Fiscal Year
2014-2015.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2015, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximum of 3) additional one (1) —year period at the same terms,
conditions anI 7feerates herein provided."
3. For Fi ear 2014-2015, the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "A" of the
Agreement shall be replaced with the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "1"
of this Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
4. All terins not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
5. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
A O of Costa Mesa
Date:
Date: 6 �Z f
INTER R
Date:
Signature
%syn Z�FNL 49 Dim Qf--Au b rt SSL-Xx,46C1
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
�Sq -
Interwest Group
Date:
Project Manager (1)
APPROVE O FORM:
Date: l (�
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
—�4z /, Lh��
RislrManagernent
Date:
Interwest Group
Exhibit "1"
Fee Schedule for FY 2014-2015
—(01— Interwest Group
Le I; - n. i i =-"' , alipp, =llz
PLAN RE1t'iEW FEES
We propose the ioltowiW iee scredWe for all ueM=- uuMnsd in tre R --P
BWldinp and Svfvr , Rim RvVWW.
~m"1, for [psi Ome rid: and prTy taqurW m
vl' 75% for mpeftWplm dmck whiff Jrduks kst iiraw mview and arm re- ° m-&Ockt vAth a IM-amilrid
'Gte no mare tan five (5) nda� days.
' r ht pmvv acct PlwD RvAm
Jor brst Ome cbech and MY rewired re=�
VMoi epedlad plan. dw,.a Otab irzludm ;rrs tim rr w and any twined r6-cl w vft a tum -aver
tim nn mom lim'bt P catfidar days,
60%iarfat i t t,ani reed
m for ex od plan dwzk �� irdWe firs: t tr Md BM1 t cti k� w#ti� a Barr
bm no mote It= five {6) tdsr days,
i
We VA POADMI "tom nor of plan rbvisv" itaratiorm ry ry w c: � swaval el each vmOoi tOT ft pu=qape 0
i � � it� r,r � shl�►p�r�i rte,
Twi e i; rJrame t r gape
"O.VP Y TELE STRUC.TURV
STANDAM JOV>RTIrE
"OURLY HOURLY
CRAW M-1 E
_-
Suim buihng Ir)Tm-lv^ (Si;wrm,V) _,... .... ___ . ........
��..._ _ .. _.... 73..� .._..,
............ 91
iof k dim (M=O;r_q_............ .,.............. ...........
_ ._.._ ..._ ....._._.............fir+...,..._.»
,....... _ .. Im
PUMExurrmc:_......... .m ... _......... .............._..,.. ............
-_..__.................
IDD
? Jmt moi_:: m_ rt Auwefj_.....,._..._ ,......� _. «
, ._.. _..._.._..._......._..-_.._...._.'rJD113
... ..._.....................«.36
vm* Tem II ... _... ......... ........... ._ .._.... ..._...,...._
..-..._--------- ----- --- ___40 ...... _.......m...,... yQ
r,uTiz*i Srrvxarf#�r�r ..._.........._ ...._....._..
......-.._..._.__.._..._.s50...,._..,.......,..,...r....53
i7tG tk l.._._.,........_...._......_.__.._...__...r.._..._.._..._..._
........ ................... ...-_.. «6 --------- _.
......... _.._....., 33
t:5uper� ! }atu�ar
_................ ......... _.R_..._..._ ._...._.._ .._63
.._..._ ....._....
�,anrq" ice; ill....,._.... ........... ................ ... _
....... ,.�5..........__..._._. _.._SDG
............... f
F" blas.". AC ..... .............. .._...................... .._..._..._..._..,_...
100
_...._.................. ...._..__....�..... $Ci.._.._..._..__..._,...,... -300
FIMM rmn:_.._,«................_..._..,_........�......._.._._....._..._...-_.,.....«._...
FIM
................... _.'�._.................. _........ lig
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this 24th day of June, 2014 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
MELAD ASSOCIATES, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below ("Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the term of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original Agreement contained a provision for four (4) additional
one (1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and will expire on June 30, 2013
and June 30, 2014, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the compensation for the first extension, covering Fiscal Year 2013-
2014, was in the amount of $536,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the second one (1) year extension for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 ("Second Extension"); and
WHEREAS, the Fee Schedule provided in the original Agreement needs to be
updated for the second one (1) year extension term covering Fiscal Year 2014-2015; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) and
which was decreased to Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) for the
first extension (covering Fiscal Year 2013-2014) needs to be decreased to include the
actual amount budgeted for the second extension in the amount of $311,580 which will
cover Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. The Compensation provided under Paragraph 2.1 of the Agreement shall
be decreased to Three Hundred Thousand Eleven Five Hundred Eighty
to --3 Melad Associates
Dollars ($311,580.00) for the Second Extension covering Fiscal Year
2014-2015.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2015, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximum of) additional one (1) -year period at the same terms,
conditio an fee rates herein provided."
1'w 0 Cal
3. For Fi 1 Year 2014-2015, the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "A" of the
Agreement shall be replaced with the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "I"
of this Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
4. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
—71x v/, a A 49— —
,M O of Costa Mesa
Date:
Date: 7
MELAP ASSOCIATES
Date: G d l
/gnature
Jo S M P. 1,1-x-1) , F— R-LzEf 10
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
—
/C -A — Melad Associates
Project Manager
APPROVED O FORM:
City Attorney
Date:
Date: a t 6
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Date:
Risk Management
/ )ls ^ Melad Associates
Exhibit "1"
Fee Schedule for FY 2014-2015
^�-,(O— Melad Associates
AO' Y
Table 4 —
Nam e/C effilleatlon
Craig Palmer
ICBO Building and
Combination Inspector
Paul Pitts
ICBO Building Inspector
Art Salas
ICBO Bu
Over ten years experience in general building inspections. Has
worked in the Cities of Lancaster, Lynwood, Pico Rivera, Downey,
Fountain Valley, and Manhattan Beach.
Over twenty years experience in building inspections,
administration, and construction. Former Building Official with the
Citv of La Palma.
Former Building Inspector with the City of South Gate.
It is of extreme importance to us to maintain a reasonable -fee schedule with our client
Cities. We are ready to provide high level, professional, and cost effective consultation
to the various needs of our clients. If needs change, or market conditions fluctuate, we
can respond immediately to any and all service level expectations. Please see the table
below for our current fee schedule.
'gable SA— Fee Schedule For Plan Check
*Our fees to be based on the fees established by the City of Costa Mesa and the most
current adopted Codes.
t ,
Complete Plan Review 75% of the plat, check fee established by the,City, Orr ew ad �o rechecks only.
hourly rate
of $60. Note that this includes the initial
Each subse uent rev'
ew may be billed at an hourly rate.
Repetitive Plan 75% of the plan check fee for the models, and 75% ofl the plan check
Review fee established by the City for repetitive plans.
Accelerated Plan Will be charged only when requested by the City; at the regular fee plus
Review an additional 50% of the plan check fee
*In lieu �f complete building�pldtt Ghee.karts,+r�qu�sts may be approved�for:separate:model �vde
checlrs, and fees may he.6ha . ecZsaccbrdan ly.
Electrical/Title 24 25% of buil 19 lam per hour.
Mecha.ical/Title 24 25% of buildinglam check fee or $60
Plumbin 15% of buildinp plan check fee or $60 per hour.
Grading Plan Review Fees to be established by the City or $75 per hour with a minimum fee
of $300.
74 e j'/ /�Sco C.
Table 5B — Hourly Rate Fee Schedule
* Charges are based on a minimum of four hours upon each request of service.
"Mileage for Building inspection Positions is $0.50 per mile if the City does not provide
transportation for performance of this duty.
`Overtime hourly rates are based on a minimum of four hours upon each request of
service. The hourly overtime rate is an additional 50% per hour.
�',ostion
Combination BH!Lq ng m I
Senior Building Inspector (:
Chief of Iusnection (Manag
Plans Examiner
Plan Check Engineer
Chief Plan Check Engineer
Permit Technician I (Entry
Permit Technician II
Permit Technician Supervi
Assistant Building Ofacial
$55 per hour
$65 per hour
$75 per hour
$60 per hour
$85 -per hour
$100 per hour
$35 per hour
$45 per hour
$55 per hour
$75 per hour
$60 per hour_
bate
�o�,'-I 4-,rcn,-
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this 24th day of June, 2014 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below ("Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the term of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original Agreement contained a provision for four (4) additional
one (1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, the first extension was exercised and will expire on June 30, 2013
and June 30, 2014, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the compensation for the first extension, covering Fiscal Year 2013-
2014, was in the amount of $536,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the second one (1) year extension for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 ("Second Extension"); and
WHEREAS, the Fee Schedule provided in the original Agreement needs to be
updated for the second one (1) year extension term covering Fiscal Year 2014-2015; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) and
which was decreased to Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) for the
first extension (covering Fiscal Year 2013-2014) needs to be decreased to include the
actual amount budgeted for the second extension in the amount of $311,580 which will
cover Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. The Compensation provided under Paragraph 2.1 of the Agreement shall
be decreased to Three Hundred Eleven Thousand Five Hundred Eighty
_ / _ Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
Dollars ($311,580.00) for the Second Extension covering Fiscal Year
2014-2015.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2015, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximum of) additional one (1) —year period at the same terms,
conditions d e rates herein provided."
3. For Fis ear 2014-2015, the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "A" of the
Agreement shall be replaced with the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit "1"
of this Amendment, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
4. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
5. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
,,�A0r�.; � � of Costa am
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES
Date:
L -2 -
Date:
Date:
Signature
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
Project Manager .
APPRO S TO FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
Date: '6 '16 `/
Date: U�
Date
&-- %� —/I
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
Exhibit "1"
Fee Schedule for FY 2014-2015
ZScott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
y
Section 6 - Proposed Fees
PLAN REVIEW
The traditional approach in proposing building plan check fees is to apply a percentage to the
-revenue collected by the agency for plan review fees. Using the City's schedule which is based
on Table 1-A of the 2001 C.B.O. and the 2002 Valuation Data Chart to establish the plan check
fee, SFA proposes to charge eighty percent t 1 of the established plan check fees for the scope
of work requested.
�l
If SFA is reviewing duplicate or identical plans on a project, the proposed fee is ten percent
(10%) of the plan review fee collected after the initial model is checked at the prescribed rate.
When doing Accelerated Plan Reviews, SFA will charge the applicants based on the same rate as
with the standard service with the City. This avoids the perception of impropriety. A minimum
fee for small projects is $300.00.
SFA will not charge for rechecks unless the plans are incomplete or revised for which the City
would collect additional fees from the applicant as well. The City would then have the funds to
reimburse SFA. Additional services outside the main scope of review would be charged at a rate
of $100.00 per hour or as mutually agreed upon based on the salary rate of the employee.
HOURLY CONTRACT EMPLOYEE FEES FOR INSPECTION OR OTHER
POSITIONS
SFA proposes to charge for inspectors as follows:
Option 1
Full-time employee with benefits billed through SFA's Agreement would be payroll times 1.81.
Option 2
Full-time employee with benefits billed directly from the staffing service payroll times 1.45.
For example, a $25.00/hour employee would be charged at $45.25 and $36.25 for Options 1 and
2, respectively.
These rates are based on the Staffing Service not being required to find and select the employee
and would be contingent upon the City finding and selecting the employee.
If the Staffing Service is requested to find the employees, rates of 1.94 and 1.55 would be
charged, respectively.
_93—
%;e4'ff del¢:,
ATTACHMENT 4
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this E day of June, 2013 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
BUREAU VERITAS, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below; and
WHEREAS, the term of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original proposal contained a provision for five (5) additional one
(1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the first one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) needs
to be changed to reflect the actual amount budgeted.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Paragraph 2.1. Compensation, shall be amended to read, "Consultant
shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C,"
attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement (the "Fee Schedule").
Because the services to be performed under this Agreement are on an "as
needed" basis in conjunction with agreements with other consultants
(CSG Inc., Melad Associates, Interwest Group, and Scott Fazekas &
Associates), the total amount not to be exceeded is Five Hundred Thirty
Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) in the aggregate. The City's
Finance Department will be responsible for tracking the associated
payments to insure that the amount budgeted for these services is not
exceeded.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2014, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the
-75—
Bureau Veritas
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximum of four (4) additional one (1) —year period at the same terms,
conditions and fee rates herein provided."
All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal coratigpi
Date:
City of Costa Mesa
j Date:
-Z?4h3—
Cf6 of Costa Mesa
BUREAU VERITAS
Date: 7:f
S' nature
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
rAVf,-AffA=/
Project Manager
Date: 6 —(0—
Project
(0
--7(o—
APPROV T FORM:
/.
Date: I I
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
—,=�45�— Date: l l
Risk Ma gement
7-7 Burcau VC1 iti15
L- xh i1r C
City of Costa Mesa
-� Building and Fire Pian Check and inspection
Pricing
3ultding and vire Pricing
Our pricing reflects our commitment to the success of the City of Costa Mesa by helping you maintain
significant quality and cost saving, benefits moving forward. These include:
V Reduced plan review turnaround times
Implementation of established electronic plan, review processes
Commirtment to mamtain a flexible rate structure
r Customized rata options for the City of Costa Mesa su:.t) as hourly, KITE. percentage based_ etc.
, Highly qualified staff compensated commensurate with their duties and responsibilities
Confidence of working wnh a well-established consuftant in b'.miness for 18�+ year; -
Hourly rotas for project personnel are outlined below:
Building ate. Afa,y Staff
Hourly 3111ino Rate'
Combination wilding InsW-tor
$70
Senior Building lnspectnr (Supervisor)
$75
Chie, of irrspection (Marrager)
$95
Plans Exami;rrar
$85
Plan Check Engineer
$100
Chief Plan Check Erigineer (Manager)
$105
Permit Technician f (entry level)
$50
Peamtt Technician 11
$55
Permit Technician Superuis-orAhanager
S65
Office Assistant 1
$45
Of€ice Assistant 11
S50
Of'f'ice SuDervisor/Manager
$55
Assistant building Offic€$l
S95
CASA
$95
Fire Plans Examiner
$95
Eire Insp ctor
$95
Eire Marshal
$105
Code Eniorcernen; Officer
$65
Sr. Code Enforcement officer (Supenn&Dr)
$110
Chief of Code Enfor erneril (Manager)
$75
*No raunbursubie cast€j
} 'A=elerated Plan Review wli° be-. 25°x„ above the fees shoyrn
'Dveitt m will be 125% above the feed shown. No overtime wilt be chmgend without upproMai fpom the City
'Pian ch": tumaround tirum for ladle of campw)r, p"ecis may be negotiated
ot-.)
Mive Fwward with C.onft:ten,�e
1
City of Costa Mesa
Building and Fire Plan Check and Inspection
Sample Pricing
pian Check Percentage Fey Option
Bureau Veritas ran offer a percentage fee option to the City of Co= Mew, for plan check service to be
performed:
Commercial Pian Review.
i ull Plan Review 8511k of the City's collected nor -residential pian check fee'
Residential Pian Review:
Full Plan Review 85% of the City's collected rerideniial plan check fee'
*Plan Review percentages lne-tude Initial review and two rechecks. Tfaird and subsequent rechecks
and plan changes ar revisions will be billed as Time and Materials rased on the hourty rates shown.
W)n Forvmrd w1th CcnfdencE
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this /15 day of June, 2013 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC., a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below; and
WHEREAS, the term of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original proposal contained a provision for five (5) additional one
(1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the first one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) needs
to be changed to reflect the actual amount budgeted.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Paragraph 2.1. Compensation, shall be amended to read, "Consultant
shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C,"
attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement (the "Fee Schedule").
Because the services to be performed under this Agreement are on an "as
needed" basis in conjunction with agreements with other consultants
(Bureau Veritas, Melad Associates, Interwest Group, and Scott Fazekas
& Associates), the total amount not to be exceeded is Five Hundred
Thirty Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) in the aggregate. The City's
Finance Department will be responsible for tracking the associated
payments to insure that the amount budgeted for these services is not
exceeded.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2014, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the
—�-- CSG Consultants, Inc.
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximum of four (4) additional one (1) -year period at the same terms,
conditions and fee rates herein provided."
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA
A municipal corpc
Mayor3,�f fhe City of Costa Mesa
I
CE of Costa Mesa
Date: (a/fb//3
Date:
CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.
Date: 5/.2 1/020 13
Signature
1=t+o?C\ dJvoVtLt- pe-esl GrLtF
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Project Manager
Date: -6 - � G - (
"—S, , CSG Consultants, Inc.
APPROVED O FORM:
Al ')
Date: 66
City Attrney '
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
'2T�—Date: — 1�� 13
Risk Man ement
-92-
CSG Consultants, Inc.
r:::!-x�;L; -�- C
Proposed Rates
CSG will mail an invoice at the beginning of every month for services rendered during the previous
month. We do not anticipate the use of sub -contractors for this project. CSG provides pick-up and
delivery of plans as no additional cost, CSG proposes the use of a percentage option based on plan
review fees collected by the City, or compensation utilizing hourly rates.
Percentage I Hourly Rate Schedule
CSG will mail an invoice at the beginning of every month for services rendered during the previous
month. Compensation can be based on hourly rates or on a percentage fee basis. Hourly fees are listed
as well as the requested proposed percentage fees:
Plan Review Services
Description
'Fee includes initial review and Z reviews, if necessary, additional reviews will Incur hourly fees
Rates
Full Plan Check Services by Percentage ....... . ........................ 75% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees
Structural I Mechanical I Electrical I Plumbing
Plan Review by Percentage .................................. I ........ 35% of the -City's Collected Plan Review Fees
Chief Plan Check Engineer (Manag"er)........................... :................................... $100 per hour
PlanCheck Engineer............................................................................. $85 - 95 per hour
PlansExaminer ............................. ......................................................... $75 per hour
Building Inspection Services
Chief of inspection (Manager)......................................................................
$80 per hour
Senior Building Inspector (Supervisor) ...........................................
. .............. . ... $70 per hour
Combination Building Inspector......................................................................
$55 per hour
Ruiiding Official Services
Assistant Building Official...........................................................................
$100 per hour
Permit Technician Services j Clerical Support
Permit Technician Supervisor/Manager..............................................................
$50 per hour
Permit Technician II ............................... .................................................
$40 per hour
Permit Technician I (entry level) ......................................
. ............................. $30 per hour
Office Supervisor/Manager..........................................................................
$30 per hour
Office Assistant 11 ....................... .............................................................
$30 per hour
Office Assistant ....................................................................................
$30 per hour
CASA Services
CASp Consultation................................................................................... $85 per hour
CASpInspection..................................................................................... $55 per hour
Fire Prevention Services
FireMarshal ................................................. ........................... . .......... $95 per hour
Fire Plans Examiner .......................... . ..... . .. 85% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees / $85 per hour
FireInspector....................................................................................... $55 per hour
Code Enforcement Services
Chief of Code Enforcement (Manager).............................................................. $80 per hour
Sr. Code Enforcement Officer (Supervisor).......................................................... $70 per hour
Code Enforcement Officer........................................................................... $55 per hour
All hourly rates include overhead costs including, but not limited to, salaries, benefits, Workers Compensation insurance, office
expenses, etc. Should the scope of work change or circumstances develop which necessitate special handling, we will notify the
City prior to proceeding. Annual adjustments may be made by mutual agreement based upon current CPI.
•
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this 18 day of June, 2013 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
INTERWEST GROUP, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below; and
WHEREAS, the tenn of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original proposal contained a provision for five (5) additional one
(1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the first one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) needs
to be changed to reflect the actual amount budgeted.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
Paragraph 2.1. Compensation, shall be amended to read, "Consultant
shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C,"
attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement (the "Fee Schedule").
Because the services to be perforined under this Agreement are on an "as
needed" basis in conjunction with agreements with other consultants
(CSG Inc., Melad Associates, Bureau Veritas, and Scott Fazekas &
Associates), the total amount not to be exceeded is Five Hundred Thirty
Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) in the aggregate. The City's
Finance Department will be responsible for tracking the associated
payments to insure that the amount budgeted for these services is not
exceeded.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until .lune 30, 2014, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writim, by the
�� InlerwL."I Gmull
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximum of four (4) additional one (1) —year period at the same terms,
conditions and fee rates herein provided."
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA
A municipal co�4
MavoyWf4h6Cifv of Costa Mesa
VA r/M
" C , , W,,/, oc,
• • • Mesa
Date: � It e) 113,
Date:
INTER -
Date: 0791 Zl. ZD l
Signature
Naive and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date: (� — ( 0 —(_,�
_ 845--
Inlerwcsi Coup
APPROVE O FORM:
Date: 1 13
City Att mey
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
A I
IQ, Date: L9171.11 3
Risk M gement
--8(0 fntcn\,csi GMLIJ)
PLAW REVIEW FEES
We pmpme the faliovArlp fee schedWe lar all seMm outiirled In M. RIFT
f BLilding and B*fa�l #'W RrAw-
f i for f si fire che&. sandrM mquimd rrrecks
+r 75% for mpedW pian am& which irriudm first itme weie and g, rewjired m-clisW wltn a =i-amwW
t ee no mom t1w five (5) caiendw .
ding t h r4=v*rment € 30 Rrlkw-
M%for epadhad plan o ch irtiudes firs, furls feMw and arra t cried re-ateackS WM a tum-arr,U%d
tirrm no more than be (5) ca*ndar days.
RM pion Review
rd
✓ far first tMe chi: arid MY mM*ed
+r 7'S% fa -r expedbd pian &Ack wiftfi kchWes first firm mvim ve, Mw mquvt*d feel ks witb a =T�-Murld
Wm no mm than irm (5) dart da•Y".
We wM *orrn the nrmber of p►an inview tfaratiam mo=ry to obtabi appm a, mi each pI*ct t0r the peromwqe�
fey pMpMed
-Dwm iM rm array fx =tmr or shippmg smvic:es
Tt is5r !or urge
lfS3lr>?'LY TEE STRUCTURE
—89—
STANDARD
OVERT1e118
HOURLY
HOURLY
CLO.MFICAVON
RATE
_ PAYE
GoMtin8itw 649&V
5eti0_ BU*img irsepcsrkx (fir j _.....-..,......y ..._..._
_ _ .......a..__ ...._...., 73.. , . ,,._............T
. 91
^tint of Inapocbm tMxtW� ...,....... ..... _............
....... .. ..... 66.........,,. .............
PIMSExem;ne_.._...,._..,_.....„._..,_..._..... ..........._..__..._..._
....................... ............. ......
... ........IDD
ter: he6;
............ ......9Q........... .,,
....... .... ...... 113
fs Tachn w 1 (entry 9-....................._.._.._..._..._
. _....._.._.. _._ ..... Q.........................._..._.38
crrrdtT=rrsban II ... _.... .......... _.._........_.........._.................._..._..._
......... ._.......,.... ,..54
?ttrlx” l elan Si:perrferru ...................._........�..._._.._..._....
___._.. _ 50 ........................
AssasWrttf„_,_....M „_... _,......_..._...__....._........._..,_................,._
.............� .._........,
...._..._........3f
Ofrzrx A matarV,
_................. ..,.30......... _.
................. _.3&
Off= Svrs'r>rv'sw t Manor ..........
......
A►sats;ara BubN otftw... ...................... ......_.._.......,,_...._.
.......... ............... _. ........... 55. ......... .......
Fnftm "EjwmA ar..._...._............... ............
_....... ...._ � ... g0 .......... _...
......... _....113
Fniispe.^tai......... .........._..._.._.._.........._.._..
............ BG....._..._._....M,.._..,.
tOQ
Fwr Madr3!.._.,..........._...._......._...__..........._.._.._..._..............._.....,.......,
............. __95._ ..................
_.,.._...919
—89—
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING & FIRE PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this l9 day of June, 2013 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
MELAD ASSOCIATES, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below; and
WHEREAS, the term of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original proposal contained a provision for five (5) additional one
(1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the first one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) needs
to be changed to reflect the actual amount budgeted.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
Paragraph 2.1. Compensation, shall be amended to read, "Consultant
shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C,"
attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement (the "Fee Schedule").
Because the services to be performed under this Agreement are on an "as
needed" basis in conjunction with agreements with other consultants
(CSG Inc., Interwest Group, Bureau Veritas, and Scott Fazekas &
Associates), the total amount not to be exceeded is Five Hundred Thirty
Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) in the aggregate. The City's
Finance Department will be responsible for tracking the associated
payments to insure that the amount budgeted for these services is not
exceeded.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2014, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the
Melad Associates
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximum of four (4) additional one (1) —year period at the same terms,
conditions and fee rates herein provided."
3. All terms not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA
A municipal corpc
Mayor q,Yly City of Costa Mesa
CEO of Costa Mesa
MELAD ASSOCIATES
gnature
JC6 51 -It p , FL --,U
Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Date: L - I /' r I
Date: /,/ 5
Date:
Date: 6�--(U —(3
;�q —
Melad Associates
APPROVED A FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Date: 66116113
Date: -Q 3o 113
Risk ana ment
—(q0— Melad Associates
Table 4 — Buildinp Inspection Staff (continued)
Name/Certifications'
Work Experience
Craig Palmer
Over ten years experience in general building inspections. Has
lCBO Building and
worked in the Cities of Lancaster, Lynwood, Pico Rivera, Downey,
Combination Inspector
Fountain Valley, and Manhattan Beach.
Paul Pitts
Over twenty years experience in building inspections,
ICBO Building Inspector
administration, and construction. Former Building Official with the
Accelerated Plan
City of La Palma.
Art Salas
Former Building Inspector with the City of South Gate.
ICBG Builditia Inspector
t<h ,,ant! .ees morn tit- eh" .w,�caa -
It is of extreme importance to us to maintain a reasonable fee schedule with our client
Cities. We are ready to provide high level, professional, and cost effective consultation
to the various needs of our clients. If needs change, or market conditions fluctuate, we
can respond immediately to any and all service level expectations. Please see the table
below for our current fee schedule.
'gable SA— Fee Schedule For Plan Check
*Dur fees to he based on the fees established by the City of Costa Mesa and the most
current ,ridnnted Codes.
Type of Review
mks
Complete Plan Review
75% of the plan check free established by the City, or at an hourly rate
of 560. Note that this includes the initial review and two rechecks only.
Each subsequent review may be billed at an hourly rate.
Repetitive Plan
75% of the plan check fee for the models, and 75% of the plan check
Review
fee established by the City for repetitive plans.
Accelerated Plan
Will be charged only when requested by the City, at the regular fee plus
Review
an additional 50% of the Elan check fee.
f}
3MUL .COrnpt�tchu�llittt'p�Alt Ai u`t{t.,"gip �� far Q:C Iiltul'
t<h ,,ant! .ees morn tit- eh" .w,�caa -
Electrical/Title 24
25% of building plan check fee or $60 per hour.
Mechanical/Title 24
25% of building plan check fee or $60 per hour,
Plumbing
15% of building plan check fee or $60 per hour.
Grading Plan Review
Fees to be established by the City or S75 per hour with a minimum fee
of $300.
_-q I -
Table 5B — Hourly Rate Fee Schedule
* Charges are based on a minimum of four hours upon each request of service.
* Mileage for Building Inspection Positions is $0.50 per mile if the City does not provide
transportation for performance of this duty.
*Overtime hourly rates are based on a minimum of four hours upon each request of
rprvire_ The hourly overtime rare is an additional 50% per hour.
Position
Hourly state
Combination Building Inspector
$55 per hour
Senior Building Inspector (Supervisor)
$65 per hour
Chief of Inspection (Manager)
S75 perhour
Plans Examiner
$60 per hour
Plan Check Engineer
$85 per hour
Chief Plan Check Engineer macer
S 100 per hour
Permit Technician I (Entry Level)
$35 hour
Permit Technician U
S45 per hour
Permit Technician Supervisor/Manager
$55 per hour
Assistant Building Official
$75 pm hour
CAS
$60 per hour
We would like to thank the City of Costa Mesa for the opportunity to submit this
proposal. We have enjoyed serving the Building Department as well as the City of Costa
Mesa in the past, and look forward to getting the opportunity to do so again. We firmly
believe that we have the most highly trained, knowledgeable, and experienced staff in this
industry, and have no doubt that we can provide professional, thorough, and timely
service for your community.
I look forward to hearing from you, and should there be any specific areas not addressed
herein, or any further information that you may require, please do not hesitate to contact
us so that we may respond accordingly.
Sincerely,
Jose Melad
President
Melad & Associates
-qZ_
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION
This Amendment is made and entered into this /` ? day of June, 2013 ("Effective
Date") by and between the City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation ("City") and
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation ("Consultant").
WHEREAS, Consultant and City entered into an agreement on June 19, 2012, for
Consultant to provide plan checking and inspection services on an as -needed basis to
support new large development projects and special programs in the City as described
herein below; and
WHEREAS, the tern of Consultant and City's original Agreement expired on
June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the original proposal contained a provision for five (5) additional one
(1) year extensions at City's option; and
WHEREAS, Consultant and City now wish to amend the Agreement to exercise
the first one (1) year extension; and
WHEREAS, the amount of compensation which originally contained an allocation
of Five Hundred Thirty Six Thousand One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($536,120.00) needs
to be changed to reflect the actual amount budgeted.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Paragraph 2.1. Compensation, shall be amended to read, "Consultant
shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C,"
attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement (the "Fee Schedule").
Because the services to be perfonned under this Agreement are on an "as
needed" basis in conjunction with agreements with other consultants
(Bureau Veritas, Melad Associates, Inter -west Group, and CSG
Consultants, Inc.), the total amount not to be exceeded is Five Hundred
Thirty Six Thousand Dollars ($536,000.00) in the aggregate. The City's
Finance Department will be responsible for tracking the associated
payments to insure that the, amount budgeted for these services is not
exceeded.
2. Paragraph 4.1 shall be amended to read, "This Agreement shall commence
on the Effective Date and continue until June 30, 2014, unless previously
terminated as provided herein or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the
—a a — Scott Fazekas & Associates. Inc.
parties. City shall have the option to extend this Agreement annually for a
maximurn of four (4) additional one (1) -year period at the same terms,
conditions and fee rates herein provided."
All terns not herein defined shall have the same meaning and use as set
forth in the Agreement.
4. All other terns, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement not in conflict
with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hand by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF COSTA I
A municipal corpor
Mayor o �C'yt of Costa Mesa
CEO of '•
sAta Meosa
SCOTT FAZEKAS & ASSOCIATES
Date:
Date:2" 2-6
Date:
Signature
'�a�ir�,S►�SIell, Gid
Naive and Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
5--1Z / -4
Date: 6 — (0 -%%
--qq Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
APPROV TO ORM:
Date: 16113
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Date:
Risk an ment
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
Sections 6 - Proposed Fees
PLAN RE, VIEW
The traditional approach in proposing building plan check fees is to apply a percentage to the
revenue collected by the agency for plan review fees. Using the City's Schedule which is based
on 'Table I -A of the 2001 C.B.O. and the 2002 Valuation Data Chart to establish the plan check
fee, SFA proposes to charge eighty percents of the established plan check fees for the scope
of work requested. �$0
If SFA is reviewing duplicate or identical plans on a project, the proposed fee is ten percent
(.10%) of the plan review fee collected after the initial model is checked at the prescribed rate.
When doing Accelerated Plan Reviews, SFA will charge the applicants base, on the same rate as
with the standard service W'ith the City. Thus avoids the perception of impropriety. A minimum
fee for small projects is $300.00.
SFA will not charge for rechecks unless the plans are incomplete or revised for which the City
would collect additional fees from the applicant as well. The City would then have the funds to
reimburse SFA. Additional services outside the main scope of review would be charged at a rate
of $100.00 per hour or as mutually agreed upon based on the salary rate of the employee.
HOURLY CONTRACT EMPLOYEE FE EES FOR INSPECTION OR OTHER
POSITIONS
SFA proposes to charge for inspectors as follovrs;
Ontion 3
Full-time employee with benefits billed through SFA's Agreement would be payroll times 1.81.
'Option 2
Full-time employee with benefits billed directly from the staffing service payroll times
r or example, a $25.00Ihour employee would be charged at $45.25 and S-316215 for Options I and
respectively.
These rates are based on the Staffing Service not being required to -find and select the employee
and would be contingent upon the City finding and selecting the employee.
1- the Staffing Service is requested to find the employees. rates of 1.94 and 1.55 would be
charged. respectively.
_C107,
v'0 ,'centrl >f:aaar--buzcr; & A&t-zewi;D1rtn., >t1eee .
ATTACHMENT 5
_q,l-
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
CITY OF COSTA MESA
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of June, 2012 ("Effective
Date"), by and between the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation ("City"), and
Bureau Veritas Inc., 1565 MacArthur Blvd., Costa Mesa, Calif 92626, a California corporation
("Consultant").
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent
contractor to Bureau- Veritas Inc: as more fully described in Consultant's Proposal attached as
Exhibit "A"; and
B. WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise
contemplated within California Government Code, Section 37103, and holds. all necessary
licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and
C. WHEREAS, City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described in
Exhibit "A" (the "Project") and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection
with the services to be performed; and
D. WHEREAS, no official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions
of California Government Code, Sections 1090-1092, in the subject matter of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT
1.1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide the professional services described in
Consultant's Proposal, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein
by this reference.
1.2. Professional .Practices. -All professional services to be provided by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their'respective fields
and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by
professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound
professional practices. It is understood that in the exercise of every aspect of its role, within the
scope of work, consultant will be representing the City of Costa Mesa, and all of its actions,
communications, or other work, during its employment, under this contract is under the direction
of the department. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may affect its
performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect
Consultant's performance of this Agreement.
Consultant shall be solely and completely responsible for conditions of the job -site,
including safety of all persons and property during performance of the work, and the Consultant
shall fully comply with all State, Federal and other laws, rules, regulations, and orders relating to
the safety of the public and workers.
The right of the Engineer or the City's Representative to conduct construction review or
observation of the Consultant's performance shall not include review or observation of the
adequacy of the Consultant's safety measures in, on, or near the construction site.
Construction materials and equipment may only be stored in streets, roads, or sidewalk areas if
approved by the Engineer.
1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City. Consultant agrees to perform all the work to
the complete satisfaction of the City and within the hereinafter specified. Evaluations of the
work will be done by the City Clerk or her designee. If the quality of work is not satisfactory,
City in its discretion has the right to:
(a) Meet with Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the
matters of concern;
(b) Require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is
satisfactory; and/or
(c) Terminate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.
1.4. Warrantv. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this
Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws including,
but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and
safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers' compensation insurance and safety
in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from
and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every
nature and description including attorneys' fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered
against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which
may be incurred by reason of Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
1.5. Non-discrimination. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage
in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their
race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical handicap, medical condition, marital
status, sexual gender or sexual orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the
Government Code.
1.6. Non -Exclusive Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into
agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this
Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services
contemplated by this Agreement.
1.7. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set
forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written
consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ
other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant's sole cost
q01- FSA 11
and expense.
1.8. Confidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have
access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and
employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other
information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement
are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization
by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall
be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this
Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
2.0. COMPENSATION AND BILLING
2.1. Compensation. As compensation for the provision of services outlined in Exhibit
"A" and in accordance with this agreement, Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee
schedule set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Consultant's
total compensation shall not exceed five hundred thirty six thousand, one hundred twenty Dollars
($536,120.00).
2.2. Additional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services
provided outside the scope of services specified in the Consultant's Proposal or in an amount
exceeding $536,120.00 unless the City or the Project Manager for this Project, prior to
Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is
specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or
additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable.
2.3. Method of Billing. Consultant may submit invoices to City supervisor for
approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be
based on the total of all Consultants'. services which have been completed to City's sole
satisfaction as of the date the invoice is created. City shall pay Consultant's invoice within forty-
five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the
services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. Any
additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as
"Additional Services" and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where
applicable, on all invoices.
2.4. Records and Audits. Records of Consultant's services relating to this Agreement
shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be
made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient
times for a period of three (3) years from the Effective Date.
3.0. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1. Commencement and Completion of Work. The professional services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective
Date of this Agreement. Failure to commence work in a timely manner and/or diligently pursue
work to completion may be grounds for termination of this Agreement.
l w - PSA 11
3.2. Excusable Delays. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of
performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts
shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, material shortages, compliance with
laws or regulations, riots, acts of war, or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a
party.
3.3 Liquidated Damages. In the event of inexcusable delays, for each consecutive
calendar day after the time specified in Section 4.1, Consultant shall pay to the City or have
withheld from moneys due it, the daily sum of $100.00.
4.0. TERM AND TERMINATION
4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a
period of 12 months ending on June 30, 2013, unless previously terminated as provided herein or
as otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. This Agreement may be extended four (4)
additional one (1) year renewal periods upon mutual agreement of the City and the Consultant.
4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of
canceling, suspending or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated
by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing written notice to Consultant.
The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of
termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering
services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City.
4.3. Compensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for
reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including
the date of City's written notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be
prorated as to the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in
accordance with the fees set forth herein. In ascertaining the professional services actually
rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall
be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings,
and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the
City or in the possession of the Consultant.
4.4. Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents
prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to,
finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings,
maps and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination
notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific
written authorization from Consultant shall be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal
expense to Consultant.
5.0. INSURANCE
5.1. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain, maintain, and
keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement all of the following minimum
scope of insurance coverages with an insurance company admitted to do business in California,
rated "A," Class X, or better in the most recent Best's Key Insurance Rating Guide, and
_ 1O
PSA 11
approved by City:
(a) Commercial general liability, including premises -operations,
products/completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket
contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily
injury with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence. If such insurance
contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this
Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(b) Business automobile liability for owned vehicles, hired, and non -owned
vehicles, with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence for bodily injury
and property damage.
(c) Workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California.
Consultant agrees to waive, and to obtain endorsements from its workers'
compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers'
compensation insurance policy against the City, its officers, agents,
employees, and volunteers arising from work performed by Consultant for
the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise
under their workers' compensation insurance policies.
(d) Professional errors and omissions (`B&O") liability insurance with policy
limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined
single limits, per occurrence and aggregate. Architects' and engineers'
coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If the policy is
written as a "claims made" policy, the retro date shall be prior to the start
of the contract work. Consultant shall obtain and maintain, said E&O
liability insurance during the life of this Agreement and for three years
after completion of the work hereunder.
5.2. Endorsements. The commercial general liability insurance policy and business
automobile liability policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a) Additional insureds: "The City of Costa Mesa and its elected and
appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are
additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with
the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises
owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; automobiles owned, leased,
hired, or borrowed by the Consultant.."
(b) Notice: "Said policy shall not terminate, be suspended, or voided, nor
shall it be cancelled, nor the coverage or limits reduced, until thirty (30)
days after written notice is given to City.
(c) Other insurance: "The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary
PSA 11
insurance as respects the City of Costa Mesa, its officers, officials, agents,
employees, and volunteers. Any other insurance maintained by the City of
Costa Mesa shall be excess and not contributing with the insurance
provided by this policy."
(d) Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City of Costa Mesa, its officers,
officials, agents, employees, and volunteers.
(e) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
5.3. Deductible or Self Insured Retention. If any of such policies provide for a deductible
or self-insured retention to provide such coverage, the amount of such deductible or self-insured
retention shall be approved in advance by City. No policy of insurance issued as to which the
City is an additional insured shall contain a provision which requires that no insured except the
named insured can satisfy any such deductible or self-insured retention.
5.4. Certificates of Insurance: Consultant shall provide to City certificates of
insurance showing the insurance coverages and required endorsements described above, in a
form and content approved by City, prior to performing any services under this Agreement.
5.5. Non -limiting: Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way,
the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which Consultant
may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.
6.0. GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the
parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior
writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by
the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail
over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including
exhibits to this Agreement.
6.2. Representatives. The Chief Executive Officer for the City of Costa Mesa ("City's
CEO") or his or her designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement
and may issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of the City, called for
by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.
Consultant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who
shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of
Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement.
6.3. Project Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with
Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.
PSA 11
103-
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and be its
agent in all consultations with City during the term of this Agreement. Consultant or its Project
Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City.
6.4. Notices: Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications
concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery,
facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be
deemed served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal
delivery; b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 48
hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such
communication is sent through regular United States mail.
IF TO CONSULTANT:
Bureau Veritas Inc.
1656 Mac Arthur Blvd
Costa Mesa, Calif. 92626
Tel: 858.863.2000
Fax: 858.451.2846
Attn: Christel White
E-mail:
christel.white@us.bureauveritas.com
IF TO CITY:
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel: 714-754-5604
Fax: 714-754-4856
Attn: Khanh Nguyen
6.5. Drug-free Workplace Policy. Consultant shall provide a drug-free workplace by
complying with all provisions set forth in City's Council Policy 100-5, attached hereto as Exhibit
"D" and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's failure to conform to the requirements
set forth in Council Policy 100-5 shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and shall
be cause for immediate termination of this Agreement by City.
6.6. Attorneys' Fees: In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection
with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all
costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the
exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms,
conditions, or provisions hereof.
6.7. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the
laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of
laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto
agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in
Orange County, California.
6.8. Assi ng meat: Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign,
transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of Consultant's interest in this Agreement without
City's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance
shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this
Agreement. Regardless of City's consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of
Consultant's obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder
PSA 11
-104-
for the term of this Agreement.
6.9. Indemnification and Hold Harmless Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold
free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, at Consultant's
sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings
brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees arising out of the
performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the work
undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall
apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its
employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action,
complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of the
Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action,
complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and
employees based upon the work performed by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized
subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Consultant, its employees, and/or
authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or
indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole active
negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other
indemnity provisions contained either in the City's specifications or Consultant's Proposal,
which shall be of no force and effect.
6.10. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an
independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur
any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent.
Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time,
or in any manner, represent that it or any of its or employees are in any manner agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all
payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation,
Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers,
agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the
services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any
and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the
independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to
indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable
worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees
due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of
Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under
this paragraph.
6.11. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee,
agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement
System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant
shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or
employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or
p/1 PSA 11
subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions,
which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.
Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or
ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors
providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby
agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City,
including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement
to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions
for PERS benefits.
6.12. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to
Consultant's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render
any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require.
6.13. Ownership of Documents. All findings, reports, documents, information and data
including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, files and tapes furnished or prepared by
Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be
and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information
shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City.
Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use
of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure
to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages,
losses, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from City's use of such
documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete
documents furnished by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports,
documents, information, data, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs,
files audio tapes or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized
representative, at no additional cost to the City.
6.14. Public Records Act Disclosure: Consultant has been advised and is aware that all
reports, documents, information and data including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or
files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, and provided to City may
be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California
Government Code Section 6250 et. seq.). Exceptions to public disclosure may be those
documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the California
Government Code Section 6254.7, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret.
The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is
designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the
disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure
is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.
6.15. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California
applicable to Consultants services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the
Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et se .) and Government Code Section
1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform
PSA 11
work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that
would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or subconsultants to
abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute.
6.16. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results
under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation
as may be required by the City's representative, regarding any services rendered under this
Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to
Consultant occurs, then Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design
drawings, estimates and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct
the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard
to the correction.
6.17. Prohibited Employment. Consultant will not employ any regular employee of
City while this Agreement is in effect.
6.18. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any
of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent
this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be
deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by
reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced.
6.19. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and
negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as
expressly provided herein.
6.20. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole
benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental
beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this
Agreement.
6.21. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement
are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or
accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
6.22. Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting
of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with
respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties
and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof
favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this
Agreement.
6.23. Amendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective
successors and assigns may amend this Agreement.
6.24. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or
PSA 97
— 109—
compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a
waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of
this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative
of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy
in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in
respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
6.25. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the
offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of
this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party, is materially
impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent
jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good
faith negotiations.
6.26. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall
constitute one agreement.
6.27. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the
parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said
parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this
Agreement.
IN WI'T'NESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by
and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
CEO of Costa Mesa
Date:
Date:
Date: (PJ'5 / ZQlZ
IOG- PSA 11
Name and Title
-4--
Social
Social Security or Taxpayer ID Number
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
AS TO CONTENT:
U �
Project Manager
ATTEST:
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
Of the City of Costa Mesa
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
-a
6''1z-
100_ PSA 11
CITY COUNCIL POLICY 100-5
SUBJECT
POLICY
EFFECTIVE
PACE
NUMBER
DATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
1 of 3
BACKGROUND
Under the Federal Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, passed as part of omnibus drug legislation
enacted November 18, 1988, contractors and grantees of Federal funds must certify that they will
provide drug-free workplaces. At the present time, the City of Costa Mesa, as a sub -grantee of
Federal funds under a variety of programs, is required to abide by this Act. The City Council has
expressed its support of the national effort to eradicate drug abuse through the creation of a
Substance Abuse Committee, institution of a City-wide D.A.R.E. program in all local schools
and other activities in support of a drug-free community. This policy is intended to extend that
effort to contractors and grantees of the City of Costa Mesa in the elimination of dangerous drugs
in the workplace.
PURPOSE
It is the purpose of this Policy to:
1. Clearly state the City of Costa Mesa's commitment to a drug-free society.
2. Set forth guidelines to ensure that public, private, and nonprofit organizations receiving
funds from the City of Costa Mesa share the commitment to a drug-free workplace.
POLICY
The CEO, under direction by the City Council, shall take the necessary steps to see that the
following provisions are included in all contracts and agreements entered into by the City of
Costa Mesa involving the disbursement of funds.
1. Contractor or Sub -grantee hereby certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in
Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's workplace, specifically the job site or location
included in this contract, and specifying the actions that will he taken against the
employees for violation of such prohibition;
110 -PSA 11
SUBJECT
POLICE'
EFFECTIVE
PAGE
NUMBER
BATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
2 of 3
b. Establishing a Drug -Free Awareness Program to intorm employees about:
1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
2. Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs;
and
4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations
occurring in the workplace;
c. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the
contract be given a copy of the statement required by subparagraph A; -
d. Notifying the employee in the statement required by subparagraph 1 A that, as a
condition of employment under the contract, the employee will:
1. Abide by the terms of the statement; and
2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation
occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction;
e. Notifying the City of Costa Mesa within ten (10) days after receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 from an employee or otherwise receiving the actual notice of
such conviction;
f. Taking one of the following actions within thirty (30) days of receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 with respect to an employee who is so convicted:
1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and
including termination; or
2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local
health agency, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
� 1 1 PSA 11
SUBJECT
POLICE'
EFFECTIVE
PACE
NUMBER
DAVE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
3 of 3
g. Making a good faith effort to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation
of subparagraphs I A through I F, inclusive.
2. Contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be deemed to be in violation of this Policy if the City
of Costa Mesa determines that:
a. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has made a false certification under paragraph I
above;
b. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has violated the certification by failing to carry out
the requirements of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 G above;
c. Such number of employees of Contractor and/or sub -grantee have been convicted
of violations of criminal drug statutes for violations occurring in the workplace as
to indicate that the contractor and/or sub -grantee has failed to make a good faith
effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
3. Should any contractor and/or sub -grantee be deemed to be in violation of this Policy
pursuant to the provisions of 2 A, B, and C, a suspension, termination or debarment
proceeding subject to applicable Federal, State, and local laws shall be conducted. Upon
issuance of any final decision under this section requiring debarment of a contractor
and/or sub -grantee, the contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be ineligible for award of any
contract, agreement or grant from the City of Costa Mesa for a period specified in the
decision, not to exceed five (5) years. Upon issuance of any final decision
recommending against debarment of the contractor and/or sub -grantee, the contractor
and/or sub -grantee shall be eligible for compensation as provided by law.
/CSC PSA
112^ PSA 11
EXHIBIT A
--1 1-,�3: -
Request for Proposal
Building and Fire
Review and Inspection
City of Costa Mesa
Su &ng and Safety
Afterftn: Ksfah Clarke
77 Fal -i Drive
Coma Mwm, CA 926P6
*fvv�,, Fr.?Wp.fd mt.Af (",Afllen�m-rf
Bureau VeritaS Nodh Arftrlm, 1AC,
1665 b4acm-tur Wvd.
Costa Masa, CA 92626
T. 714.431.4100 714_825.1660
pva," a- guLmda 0 usbu reauvaM,, as -own
- I lis-
Table of Contents
I _ Table of Cmitents
I Approach to Serwims
4. Building Vie% CapabMles
a. Building Department Administration
Vii. Bulling Inspection
c_ Plan ReWew
d, Tumaround Timms
0. Permit Counter selvices
f. Green Bijitading Expertise
g. Third Pam Plan Check
5. Puts i, Wo*s Capabilities
6. Statring
7. Project Exp Nance
8_ Pn
A -11 f 0--
ova oward wind^ Confidence
Fir m Q u a 11"fi c a tio n s
-1 lq-
K
City of Costa Mesa
Building and Fire Plays Cherlc and lspon
F'rr QualifcaVons
Bureau Veers is a one op shop far fill -service consu ng to jurisdictions in California. We leverage multi-
fsi aed staifng to p'mvide cwnpr&Rnsive services, working on pmFects ftom the pm'iminary review StaP
to issuance of tne Certificate of 0 panty. We custDrnize solutions specific to each dienft and our cmalive
thinking and pa5t expadenCe SaVeS Our Clients time and money, viMe its providing the staffing levels
ceded to fit fir rwds. I r, addition to our fall servicsoode. woA we can pr ide matter planning, w0gram
r anag r t. ,departmental manopment staff auqrnenlaWn, plea review. wde consuiting, enviromment2l,
health, safety, constriction mama nit, building, sr4 inffrast udure inspection expertise and MOUMM,
Founded -in 1828 Bureau Vefts Notth maraca I= is a global adw in quality murar4a, health, saietly
and onvire► ntal (QHSE) so=uticfts,, RewgnizAd andaccred-it-ad by the largest r'taWnal and Wernafmoal
organizqWns, ard %W(VI avey 52,000 employees, Bureau Venues has s.rnparaheled expertise and resources
Est cartage p j t� "Uirifng a broad rang€ €cf rti , g & vat �raphi-es. Wth cper�sti�rfs J.n
140 countries and all continents. Bureau Wriffis draws on the synergies t t v"n its Jowl tears and
dedicates technical cent thrt ughoi t the Woft We are the number I independent eovironmenta1
consWi ing ft= M the United Staff and the largest 0evalor ijspectjoai ff 3,n the United States.
Our ti l p -n'ee 8fjcws Bureau Warr .s to provide timely delivery and exceptional customer servI�ce
in ft m 2 cast-aftotive manger. Our logj-standing essence in Southern Galifbrnia, and past exPer*Wa
working in the pity of Costa Mesa has enabled is to gain the knowledge of ft 1=l area and toprovide
continuity, responsiveness to oq l assigrinwnts, and technical proficie y.
Went Sits Us Apart
We a:q H4�eeily suited to provide BuI ing and Fire Pian Check and lnspeoW'n Serves mouse we possess:
Unparalleled Building WQV and Code Consulting EXPWOSS
• prGven fum y auildir�g safety -track lard abonaply (4W+Agendles inkfoka)
• 3-ult'ding and Safety Consuffing to 150+ Agencies in California
• li+lur idip i Management arA Staff Augmentation E p
Key st at Have Heald Establish and Implement the Latest Intamational Cods
of Rewmrm and Proxima to Most Peak Workloods
Flan check wirvIoes gilt be provided from € ur eta Mesa, Corona, Son Diego, Swramento, and
San Ramon, CA cMcft
50+ C MaThroughout ft United S - 5 Cff=s in Cali is
Regwemd Engineem and iC . �i Staff DedicaW to Caft CDmpflanew
USGSC LEER Revue► CedSfy irkg icy
No Private SwAor n Work = deo Co4flict of Interest
8.est praoticva and Sta f-th rt Processes to ConsiStentY Most Tumaround Scheduws
First Firm to Achieve IAS CemficaWn
CompTehensive and Formalized Plan Chemo Perdu
A-WinrEingWeb—Based Pm Tracking and Contfols
Eie nc Plain eck to Sava Time. Money and Paper - A GREEN s udon
9 Success .Rate Meeting Rwv w Turnaround Schedules
^:._
Move Forward w4h C-onfdanca
it of Costa Mesa
Buani Fire Plan Check and Inscon
Firm uali3fications
. .........
Strong Municipal focus
Heiped E-istablish and Manage Departments for 20+ Newly fF
Incorpomted
Provided Municipal Department Head Positions for 50+ Cities
The Right People Doing the Right Job
We have extensive rescurces and a large pool of licensed and
*Orof" bujWng safes expeft wfto are equipped to hand W all
of the CWs needs, inducting WUN, wW RM Plan che* BuOd-' mo
and Fire Inspection. PeTrnk and Counter services, Code EnfDrIcement. LEED review, ADA Compfiance,
and aultding Wunls Services. Our prGfessagar als have extensive experience in wmmaf4al, residential,
industrial. energy, and instRuVorml proimft of all sizes and compWities, W.1O them to tailor solutiorm
specfficalty to the CiWs needs,
Bureau "Arfts and our proposed, Hy -based s%ff for this cantract have a ung-es%bfthed history
worldrta for the nearby muni 4palines to petbTrn OutsWe ptan check and field inspeeon services.
Consequen.Uy, we can %verage a breadth of code compliartce and permit prccessirtg expertise to mee, the
needs of the City, and offer highly quaflfg7MOrs and, ECC -certified staff who aTe m dose proximity and
can quickly respond -to the City's ft"o4s.
Bureau Veritas Is the First Firm In the World to Receive tA$ Accreditation
NotabJy, Bureau Veritas is Me fint oompany to achie" accredilaUon under ft InternOons' . Ammdfttan
Service (1AS) Thirdarty Permitfing, Plan kvand gnspeaton SeMm Providers Accreditation Program
(AC 402). The M imitation pmqrsm was dk"d to v" the competenoe of cornpaws that provide
servkAs for WOOS departments.
The accmditaVon damonsfttes to our current and future dients that we have pro in P1800 to ensure
consistenty in how we perform plan feviews, Inspections and administrative actions. Through the paftft
avaluation by IASI, it al ao rsinfo=s our tau-sirms values of customer focus, share col ectiveknoWiedge and
cooslanT teaming, transparency, tearwovork and soUdaft.
Mova Forward with Conf-dence
city Of 00$ta mesa
Building and Fire Plan Check and litspection
FluallficabOnS
t —En ....... .... ..........
Bul'Ung departments can use the 1AS prograre to vee fy that the compwiles they hre are quallw to
pwVide building safety services for the juftft6on, For Bureau Veffws.
a=editafian is a way to provide lndopendent verfficaVon of our
established quality pmzedures and t proc',ices that have been an
integral part of the company since its founding M 1828. 11!11011-1, Am= 'goo
Awl A4W—
,D achieve mS accreditation. IAS evajustom assessed the Bureau
VeytWs piano office =rriss several dist nct tea r" induding COOO
admiMsUation, constr=Uon cod0s, plan review pr y, Pmfessional
I A
credentals and basing, and inspection pr=char es. In. addition, 1AS
assew9d cntmi elements of the seMm provided to jud-9eldICTIS
such as conlr=t details, operabona� procedures and ptafts, ard fiscal
year budgets
AC 402 re aims acemdUd third-PartY serv= Pmvida'm W' submit srnua. 8 . reports iaddressing key e!ements
of ftm data as wa4� as changes in Rey SlOff, fRdflifies err operating procedures oT any pmb?,erris tfMl, cOulld
powntially'affact the qn!�Vs ared,; W status. At the end of ft thre&-year term Mftmenfing from the iniW
date of acaredftatie n, the agency Will be sub�,,eCt to full on-sRe reevaluafion by AS.
ccTed' led a
who Spec
We have a team Oj reg%temd qngjnews� arc:WftCC
cts� and I-Mrtlfied Wchn;cal stdla,520 in the
plan chw*, code Oojr�pliance. and jnsp"ton bids_
MoveForward mh Cori ick ."Ce
-121-
City of Costa Mesa
a
Build€ng and Etre Plan Check and Inspection
Approach to Services for the City of Costs esa
�jj roach to Services for the City of Costa Mesa
orwau Verbs orrde:r :ids the City's desire to lish s relafionship with s `ns12larat that proAdes high
quality services in a ftexible grad Integrated manner. �o � �rd6 ��r��G� Veritas i� plows to � �
have developed rrary such colWborafive relationships YVAh € lients and endue the benefits of these cloW
working tonships, We WitidPate Similar scams with the City 0t COStR Mess, and are reedy 40 develop
a partnership to assure high WMce leve€s, excellent dura and prat 4eiler ry, and strong staff suoPort,
This type of ipitearated approgch Is tit designed cdFaboratively w4h BV and City sal woridna together
find the best salutt+or_ We arra pate this would include a combtration of t dit 't l offe.4r4s Such as *ff-
me p?an review and staff augmentation, with more innovative 'full serves so-.1utiorss that fit the City's afi'rarrgrng
needs, 8V envisions a strong °aa needed' concept to sef*= with fliNdbrltly and laboration in rend,
and s saamNm integraticm wi% 8V stalf proVidinig services that fA ft cuiture W ft Cly. OUr sefviOes vAll
be del is In a € an that is Wnsistent with customer expectations tam € d by the City of Costa
Imo. vVe Vill monitof our servicas and witl be quickto asks any adgustments needed,
8v services will flex to sglt the rreed. A 90WJ exam. ple is -on-site staff augmentation on an 'as needed has: e
that spews �he City to achleve expeoted tervice levWs for high activity perp With ft awildy to reduce
wnsullant staffing when m%Ayfeturns to City &Cori` s,','Laffing levels. We Voitl have toml off ready to same
herr any proms anso in the QY of COSase. We anticipEft staffing needs may mer e11 POSWOns
desired includmq. but not limited to., Building. Fes, and Engine2ring 1n�t-Dns; Building, Fire, Snd Ciwft Men
Review, Comma Enforcement marital Gonstrer on paw , ct k4anagernent and Inspection, Special trspeotiorts.
CASA mviews, pefmlWng stW other technician brei tis, induding dcW, Svroau Writes has tt depth
of resoumei to provide all of the City's service needs in a con istant Aid rotmbW manner.
r.
.�.' Mows Fozww'd wlh Carilit LMW
m
Building Safety CapabiWles
Building Cap dment AdMi is' €rn
u=u Vefts has helped over 400 pub -Ho mid pfNate agencies in California nandle their code compliance
needs from futi-setvice buiid" department edrrtWsttation to tergeteed, as -needed remits. Bureau Veritas
is the Citys ideal partner to dOWer 1he quality service, tetvWca3 p ioiertgy, ;ampoftsNerwss Thal 8
pubo agency desi= when fry with rapW dem vnt, budget constraiols, and Emi'ted resources.
Bumau VaTiMs yrs e full range of bulkling d€ Paft teat setvIces Including:
Building Citi Cs unloT SupW M Community Cu ch
Building g and Fire Plan Review Codeorcarr*C4 NPDES/:fir Cuet't y CornPlaTice
Permidtng 1 Pmmsing Inspection Std Training
partrmring mrAh 6,umau motes provides the City of sta Mesta wO Immediate re urs- As tN3 deTnand
on ft City of Cole Mese Inca, Bureau Vis will sUpplenwnt staffimg vels with di oM4
rewurces, The insult wM bean offixient and o261 -effective Wuftn Mat provides the deWbpr t
munity a� a high level of end a and car rMi ..
The,se s&Nices include, but are not limilled to, the kWng:
Felt Building Administration Smi CssuancO cif rmits, rfi� of OCCUPOncy, rea�uked
City reccwdkeeping, taking and responding to iarspechon Mquests, pefformin. PlOn MhOWS,
ernforcing pertinent agency. County, State and Federal re Mations faNina w0in the pUM-Ow of the
Sui ing Deperb"nt
Fire plan review and Inspea inn
Generate plan review and Inspection Teports
Fate' I anc reqWred Information into agency's permit tracking arra repoding sys rn
Attend ProJeot Review cammfttee (PRC) meetings w any rneetino related tea the Building
Department as mquireed by the agency
Prepare and submit a weekly plea reg,#ja status rep and a cor�tit'�r �s�n �4e� turnaround report
as specMad by the agency
prepam a monthly Inspection parity repo
Scan ell n+t�Y 5danttet approvedValens and d r enls in �r n with 4 ng€�rrcy'� ride
management pm duras
Asysl agency wife drafting an4 presenting Of *rdin3r=8 and resWufiOns
Maintain and update, as n-acessery, public asamt2nOO and wde rated handout naterWs
Conduct community workshops to educate Con`t1`0&,OTs, lit melwtters, arohlteoW, enginev , etc.
PaTE pate as the extension of enc staff in emergency events
Ravi :v sand appal of any Mer t tes ng or steal inspection reports require d bar t et for
ongtAng construction
, sl in pieparing. and priGnt nng budgets
MtjV@ FaRWaTd IMlh L;onTtdE-nre
City of Costa Mesa
Building and Fire Plan Chezk and Inspection
Building Safety Capabilities
M-M-M—MIMMMM-1101—M tmm—
. .........
Building
Sureau'Veritas provides full Wildl-;nq InspoZon services, We can PT.ovide inspection services fdr a sing
prep aat presents unique cornplexites due toft construebon or size, or we can pra*4e enough staff to
haridle all -inspection ser`vms for the City of Gosta Mw"., Our building inspection can be adjusted to pmv4o
a high level of coadination sperAcefty suited to 41ha -design build can pt.
Bureau Veritas' in-spectscan teams also provide on w9 bvDding inspedon services to 00ver staff vacation
UrrA, peak work boads, "clailzed inspecbon activkWS, air Any oftr situations that may arise. The"
activItip—s may incUle ne"ay inspec6ons and same-day response to important or urgent requ", ts,
Plan Review
Bureau Veritas pemonnel hmm pedarnied and managed plan revi e for ftraly thousands of projaM in
Caiftm�a. Pmjed types nal
h7qh-rtse hoWs and offim buildings, insgtutio�,l o=paWes such as
Ja0s. semiconductor fabficaticn fadlibes, shipping facilitios, rown additions, single-fam14 Imat and custom
hom,", Olt -up shells, tonant Improveman1s, arW Inftsoucture (mods, wet ond dry uM tis, etc.). Our staff has
conWderable review expederwe of vilually any structure requidog permits, Van mviews and inspealons.
Vft such a large and rmnsed plan review ", we are aWe to martage nu m, and covmoax proocts
simultaneously- We are able Z, prt*de discipfine-spe-cffle pW reviews sVur-tiral, macharftal,
nowss, stnwt, drain ap, map, cK inftastrucWte, etc.), Key IM-cergled reviewers are, membefs of code
oommhtees with professional oTgentmbons, while other reviewers are registered enginearaAarW surveyors
proWent In the civil plan checWmap review aTena.
Wo are the largest an review firm In the UnItod States, pmvidirl Each service code cwtsufting and plan
raview services- �t is our g0a; to Me4t and exceed the service lave` mquired fns m our dients. Our team,
provides pian mvi fbr compWp*a with a variety of codes,, induding cornpliance *tip the Into mabonal
Suil,ding, PlumWnq, lm l., Mechancal, Fuel Gas, Er m-rgy Conaemfion, F- fre and t" National Fkctnc
Code as adopted by the City of Costa Meaa-
Orr Services e=MPM',
19 Review kw filne msistant building eel rnents
Archqactural, fire and iiia safety plans examir%Won
Stnn%iral plans examination
Energy code plans mmirtation
Gareser free plans examination requirementsiDisabled ac -cm
Mechanical, p1mr.nBing and aledrical code plans examtnation
Review and approval of aft—mative mat €s, afternative design and methods of construction
F'[ -;e sprinkler. and fina aMrm system plan revieAs (as requested)
ADA soo-eWbdity reviews
tw
Move Forward wtin Confidence
City of Coag Mesa
Bonding and Fire Plea Check and Inspection
Building SafaV CapabilifleS
it is our goal to meet and exceed the ser ce levels required from our municipal cWnts. Our tears provides
plan retiefcr compriance with a vaftty sof comes, including € ompliianc a with lntwnati€ na' Build --ng Codes,
the UrtNorm family of n es, and various state and local m9ulalions throughout the United Stets Our
prelbssional s has extensive a rimrt+e revievving all types of construcfiar, and buVdi€rg occupancies -
Plan Review Tvmaraund I Imes
Bureau Veritas can provide plan review aclMtjes on a fast-trackbasis, Tu around times for each submAtei
Wil Wata to ft size and Mature of the project and is impact on the constmcban scheduka- To re=00 turn
around tim. es, we car. use ete is subr�rttats, p � s�brrsit is, �� calling, vi �ferer nes
{ ,
and ►diets by On revew stail to design offices of the racer's designers and to pointe of feb*mWn.
Bureau Vefitas has Wilt long -teen partnerships WAh ager, es. We undefstand that accuracy. eftiency,
and ij4wgifty in all asp is of prof SIM -1W services are required, Testrr�ray tD our pmfessional texF lenge
fs ttre fact �a�t we provide sem to Mar ��f r��r rorr�, pal €en% since their in rparation. cause oaf
catrr' r"ur pool of �a✓c3F3s3 b1 r orf we are able to assemble � r�� pee tnet In mer W er�s�tie
pro wed !+� rewvery char, nec sa ey . Bureau rrea ere v 1t r eirrtai a nt .a around terra err all
revue a key Me c�rerkie t Of Our pefo alc for Our n rievie,*v se- The follaMing whedute is a
frpr r'll3f ve sampling Of the review ureses asseela*d �i � type ��i Potiony*u can anti ..pate.
_ _-- - ...
�m 3 4
7 F
I:pa4 ,.k,«.
r10-- _—
Bureau Veht WKI atso acomodate Preliminary reviews to facitilatO fast tr -ked Or 800e*mWdW ojewm
'This will aid w� dh timely t€�er�r round and a � Public r tions. if Bppt€tents inclra designs that do not
confom to the p scrlptive uire-mants of the codes, f city's des, gnea will have final apprOvEii Gveg ft
plan bejng revie d. Our staff iilr- ake re+r Mmeedetiom for the re9!)iuucn if mquested by the City. We
OTS alsoilet�ie t meet vtith agency staff. Gr Others as needed to &Scuss Wr findings.
Pwmit *Umar Servizes
Bureau ei � staff 11'i oro in rllunction with the GItY St to srr'aOOthly "rPle"nt i�3�Ttgt s' contacts
9
���r pc,r��Ats, a plan d� a�r�d iar�n r��ti�ns. Prii�r � beingassigned v; the C�ty►, i�caMeaa
"� 64ta�s stiff rltl t it d ana prof ant in Clty li�i+es, PWAd
d :and n# r Processes- our staff
w€li a�T� t4 a'i3EeueiOJU penainlrlg to lrlspGivti€3ns,
len eppro%rals business license appfiDWK and
rtifx2te-s of G=parcy. we wi l deliver same day lsstwnce of over the counter omits. and wM f0110W
documented eritar al praalc i anti r d r>
in providing ourservices, lura r are, our off uvill provide
b quality �nleA serf ars a r ael aid pr tes:�ional rraanner, so as comply v�i3 e11 applicable le br i ing
des and > a ip t nt tq € d r-rp'ale th-0 draft assraoialed vrit�r cond�e r*p e�r�l permit p�c�sirt�
and front counter ;�ttaea on an 4as needy baste , as dictated by lfie City
�,Move Forward -with Corlfdentn
Green Building ExpaMse
Bureau Varifas is at the for&mnt of the Green Building movement and by implementing Green Building
SoMions. we help reduce energy OOMMPfion, maintenance and cap-Aal costs, anvironmntsl ZrnPact, 8nd
fncma-se ocwpont cornft,-t and heath.
ExpefUse in 2ssisting municj�l clients in Green Building Ordinance �rnpkwenlafion
pr*vdW Wm*maWIy 1,000 t -EEM reviews for ft USGBC
Sufld'aV. SW"s
LF -ED wjbrnift� consuftfion
Green bumin.9 COMWTV
CALGreen Code ComprIance
ENERGY STAR varftaftn
Enat9y efficiency Wdft
Chain of C�Swy (COC) Cemficalion
Third Party Plan Check
Bureau VariMs pmvides �cornprehensive Third Party
plan ChWA Services for 1=1 apncies. Since we
don't do design work for the private SVOW, MOFQ
is never a conflict & intOregt and the agency is
assured that ours of cerfifted Man Reviewers
and licensed plan review angincers is committed to
onforramment of all applirWO StWdardac
We am ailiways available to discuss the rosults of tinc *00
review with ft app!icant- Bureau Veritas provides
direct dant intaftoo vAW4 th* aPpli.cant ural all
doo-jMents are wmplete: and then fomards thorn to
thoJori 4iction for mit igSuan0e. I
- 12--l-
mova Farwam yr;tj� confidanw
_1
2�-
Civil stzCapabilities
Civil Eaginaaring. services
When planning W designing mfrastfucture projects, vaitous
complaxifts can 2nm that require- spwmlCW.8,Qtt2nti0n- and
0MOUVAY. EiralUaling life Cycle costs, determining Me 'best vahW
WuNon, rn;tnimWng OWStruction Impacts, enhancing maintenance,
aanktq community supprml., these am sMa of Vw factors that need to
be
you time and
Ming t the big picture to SOVO asseswd as part of 100V 3
Pr
"annir au VeMIN 8 uv��'des
From. pret� Jnary eng',neering and p, �.g to finw design and construction support, Bum
value-added Services that Yield IMOVOWe Yet practioas solutions to promote cost-effand Umeiy
daWary, whfla proleang and enhandttg the value of your infrastwoure. Our man-agers ensure te-cMical
viability, monilor sched0eWbudgets, incoMorste va[ua enginewng practices, and assum " entire prwiect
F. -or s s proven aNtdy to ad
team int rates searnlmty to deliver the best possible per. 0 taff ha a p , nor Wft
and under budget.
to keep your projeCts. on srcWu
to
nis d assess pdoriSas M orde,
rnunic�pal oIQ an
Succuaful pmj7eat Marltagemant On p4tflic waft design and enineenng pruiects requires a strong
oornmitrnenf, from the tearn partnws to effectively batance scope, scha&ds, and budget throughwt the
Iftcycle, This requires working in partnership and reaching agreemnt on project goals and expeCtations
Milially, and maintain-ing fluid communicalmn eaft-y andire n.
Civil Engineering Approach meet with a mquest fir
r andlar Task Leadefs M h the Cfty Vpon rewfving a now te
out pfoj�W M2nage
scope and fen to mview oils sw ctations, a nd
the requested pe, is pre set of assufflO If expe
d
project values and vision. Thew will 8119W us to provW9 the City with a Be of SMPO ROMS, reWed fees, a,n
a Schedulc UW is apprajxiate for the particular projeft
Our commitment to quafty and Service Is SCOMPlished through open commlirtication with our team
meas
Msmbers, up the chain, dwvn the roti -airs, and laterally. This commiltment usugPY nthat our team
mach on each comment provided. We W1 f=S OUr Mee
sit with the City MW review our planned app
firna to discuss thow comments that eftheT cannot be Implemented as req UaStW,;ar where there M, Sy be 0
oommunication gap and our team members MM not Olt In agreement For the sake of efficiency the ftOms-
ntendp scusslDn.
that are agreaseD are not i� d to be part Gf the d4
Our team YvMcontnue Pie pTogression of design development. MY review, =n"MOnt resopition M9909,
-on
-ed to the Saftfacti the lily Mrd -meets the pm
ent untl,,. the projwt is complet
and design advancern
goals, our OM i" out Contmct Thi
woTk ptan and mitment is to follow #uough in ell our swgnmerft Ah 8
proem w�i.11repeat gsn
ew jas� orders are identffied.
(2q
Movo Forward v#ilh Con, ridence
M, WHIM
-130--
Key Staff Members
n P n . ev,
e dynsm�cs assodlated wfth administe6ing the Ci,,y of Costa WsB79 Bufl6ng aid Fire fa R i3W
rn ca
Services pl=s a prernium on proViding a staff and organizaWn that pro OIRS 0"Wity, pa4fty, CUSt0m0T-
0-"Intalim owttin uity afVJ strolvj technicat competence, Sureau Verfts'orgaWmaticl-al stnmturO (rlaximizes
Burc,.au veritas, key, 1=� Lead
close 00mmin!wbon and the a=untabilftY Of project team Members-
ReprGuntafive Pwsonn8l am committed to providing quality sem ms to the City of Costa Mesa -
V
Bumou VeriWa will p -=de a Wienagament Team 10 tl Cjjy of Costa Mess vaso %vill have extensive
14n ledge of Wld7mg DePaftnant 2nd Pubric Worm op ns, with - a c�ear understanding of ComMunWY
Developnwt, and Economic Davelopmeflt kdemsts. AdditOnally, Our ManagementTeam VwIl have extensive
kncWedge of Southem Caftmis and ft City of Costa Mesa in order to ensure enough resou=s We
avaitable. to provide exceptiDrawl vistorner serer and mwd the needs of the Oty of Costa Mesa -
Core and remote staffing p,,,-ovided to the Ci Y Of CQsW Me*,a mll be knDwe in SH iOwHy adopted
cmlasand ofdInwr.0S, and have a knai�dge of SOU%OM CQW-Omit its and cftate , ensurinQ high
quality oustomer service Is provided, Each individual W.1 be cartifted in their respective dmdplims by ft
Intp-mational Code Ccuncil,, and many will have multi-"cipline cerUficaEons. enabling them to PrOVAS
oompnDhensiva services to the Qty
-131 -
Mo
131 -
Move Forwald With Confidenw
Cartiftational License:
Icc ceTbftd Bultding 011wal
ICG Certified Bu7idinq Plass
EXOMAX-f
ICC Cadftd Buildng Inspedor
C -Over, Point Building pmlessional
Gmfoi PtW Fteor
Ceeaed 5-�neW Agglaor
CA ReqisUmnd M,%"Ister Sem��100
Worker
Prol"sional Affiliations:
Pam CAmnjamonw, CQ1110MA
SuWing Siandards Commission
CALSO, ftst Pies-derd
mrd Member, Cdftmia St3te
Ar&;jteds Acvizury Boa -rd
L&qgUe of California Cities
Pete Gujsas*la, C80 I Plindial In Charge
Pete has over 30 years of local Building Department exper5ence in a
fast 91rDwin Caritomia qty. As Chief Building OfflcW, PeWS (Ole also
expandled Into other Seas of dty govemonent Including Carnmunity
Devetopment, Economic Development and specW projects f0f MO
Cily mapagees office. He has been very atilvein CALSO and ICC
Chapters, serving as Pmidenl of both CALSO and the ;gam mento
Val%y Association of Building Oftials. He cuirently serves " the
SVA80 Board ol UreatDm.
to has many years of crave partic4paban in State and hycal code
deve�OlWent. and is used ass resource by many State apncies-
During the 1M's Pete was appOifltOd 10 ft Callga Bwbr*
atandq:rds cornmissim. He curre-nVly se on the Calftnia,
State Apchitecls Advisory Board, DSA CASp Committee, Fire
Marshafl's Wildiand interface task force, and the CALBO ContractOrS.
ArchiterAs, and Enq�nears BoardComm' ?,ttec- pote is also a nvmber of
the LesTie of Cafifornia Cities HCED Comrnhm. and is a key Wim,
to League staff in matters of State mdes and Logistatioi-I Mat Jnv*1V0
jowl govornment
patq is a ouild it Gnn° pr0rqSSj*n8j and Gmwpoint rater. He also
Seplod on t1ho Conventiongi Constnxton Task Force in the n0onW,
effort to rswr,,Tle quiWing Code fcw re�wdenfial structures- HO Co-
authoTed Mo books on disabled access- He also ?4"nstrucLs tn mony
subiW areas im;iudinq Acimmibility, Ofeen, SuNding. Shft Laws, and
Suildtnq DeparOnent Manag.mm-nt,
Instructor, WiforniaQuik[ MV ived evefal awards in connw:tion with his PrOfussi0irmi
officials trairom Instimra im) Pete has rem s
Build if Green experience including 2009 California Burlfta Offidol of the year
Award, the `Fa bft Sootor Award' ire IM for the Pla=CoUnj-
Economic Development Board for s"am16mg the Wtdinq petm,d
pr ss, Califamis Senate resolution of appredsUon for public SOM79ce,
and the CAL80 Presidents Award for outstanding Achicvemert
Set -Oct Pr�ject Experience.
C043ultding Official, City of West Sacramento,, CA
pe% pro
vides MnSultation with the Building Official on Mai is
petMining to ooda interpretation, altemate matt md apprwches: and
now codes swr. to be adopted local code am- ndments, green building
c*des, and dcussiftg local polides related t building department
operations.
Prinelpal4n-Charge. Vada" C9110MIa JurledtWons
Pete provkjea oversight and management of staff augmentatiQ-1 and
plan rwiew for several Nodhem Cajjtm� juftdictians induding the
Cities of Burlingame, Ran& o Cordova, and Lincoln.
mcve Forward vAih Confidento
7`
F City of Costa Mesa
Building and Fire, Plan Cheek and IMPOCUOA
Educaftn and Registration& 13M a'l£sbar3O , C80 I Pfloj ct ana r
Bili b6ags 40 yrs of e.Xpa6erce di giting code enferoernent,
VRga"s Colli p f,'ujrsenvorfk (CM inns udinq pian review, building safety administratiGn, inspection,.
Engin rim and ConstruCion nyunidpal cede anforcenwnt, and fire provention. oto PTOvides a frrli
lrrs ti a cornpliment of Building and Safety w.trae services, includin-9 building
f 1„ 1-711 ' rt t administration, plan rte, and insp on servi-ws fOr
cities and urtt in Calffomia and has sem as a Bulldirg Oftal to
�:. Rg3aarartcy
a-Ijaht puWflc agOnCIQS,
Ad in tr€ n Bureau Veritas Nom America s ine Un a�agar
Bill is responsible for the Suring a Safe cde + hie
� Di�isien inulilrre:rctCalifornia i'ciding Plani�ev`iQ inspection.
{ alsty Assurance Inspectlon. Third PartY Plan,Rqqjew. Ful.. Service
S -u+ 5fuf Tr -.la Record Doetsee-ang'
dl��s Plan €���ai�Buildingpartrr.�errt staffing as wen as off Augnlii�flra staffing.
� � f res imibility t cw c ients inVentura, Los germs, i� rsIdr�,
Przr pored Ordman for Cc&
n E rcardino Courdies,. and the � 1 1 y.
{ ?campliarrz
y It l g rat d tit o n01hes of Laguna MIK
F)da Expetti F=Wwtlr� Laguna Nigral, grad Rancho Santa ar eta, CA
rn ,part r� i giarwl Maft, Bill responSi for p vsding full s= est bu ld7mg department
code ROM mart Pro��, a Ixed- st�Mons adhering to tine lir tidy l �r.�xements of each cill serums.
tt F;3 64ics Rei nsibiti includedBuilding i t dube Permit Technic
counter assisteno over-Urie-counter plena check pian the c, and
.5 year M$Mbo.r 01 tine awMing Wj2rd inspection sere. Mso Tesponsiblie for the colleamn of petMit
of Appeals, City Of r 60 fees and d sits, prerrnit lss�aeri psx ii . and file` maintenance
s performed by qual ied persminel_
i l'dl
S-RjetySgrAoss. City 01 Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Bill served as the Building Officiat for nine years, diledW elt code
enforcement a� iti ? incudf I Id ng end f4ty, rti l Codc
enforcement, and fire PrOMrtiOn fair new =Strums, managed a
W ff ,cf u>fi r rriiliica fidget. implemented automated permitting
Pare s If to City council and Planning ommissrio,
iii die g prering r r'tla and mOking repo r i ti s.
CA
Building $qty Sia - MY Of Dovey,
mill served as tyre Building Official for eight years- i On�ibf� frac
overseeing tl�ypa��r+tildi�r�(gp/Safes Didv�i� O'n,�np 0"ins[ins$finga Of+buildviing�
i $:f�/R'ay xis n 4/hackI,• , public cour to E�4�iStOncs, aftd ti+'�+"dO
enforcement .Supewised a staff of 16, managed budgets, and wrote
agenda, slsff r�poi ,,t�rdiiiarts a MsOl itis for City court is
considerawn, n,. -a1 b�tildir�gf p�'rft"5 ittt ►fid t r r #�u do and
enclosure a regionals ng rale. Aiso over s the branding Of
miser Haalth rare tac ift s and directed const'ucdorrt of a phase
[”-dustrrel r�.,
move Forward �tritYs Cvr2P�de nc-'
Co6ficztIonsf License: Tom Whisler, PE [Project Manager
Liwnwd CACI Eregi mimr. Seleat project Expetienc--e-
Development Services Manager, County of Santa Clara, CA
I= Corufto PWS examW Dulles ire managing the BuVeding lftepeOiOn Office. IhO L4nd
CA Develop rpt office, and the County Surveyor'$ OfficO. 88 w8l] 85
the Clean Waler PrcgrSM, the FICOdPWn Msnagermnl Pmgram,
,ionts imcludW sunford
IC_30 Builaing OffIr
and ft Code Enforcemnt Program- Wjor d
University, pracessing Wants for a dive M 89.n -business industy, and
Build 11 rtan pr&OssiO.ngI capftl improvemeent pr&IsOts for the County of Santa �'e BrR.
Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
prayer for Stanlbrd University Wciwded:
a Compiate. tear -down and re-construcfion Of the fQ01WI st2chum
Reconstrun of the histoft Main quad, Ind uding Me I M
mem,cTiat Church and oftr *Uctures a the 1999 LOM
Pftw Eanhquake
Construaon Ott
The Chafts Munger Gfaduate ResldentiW Center
The Huang foie nce and Engineering Quad
The Wedical, wool Quad
The Clark Center
The Bing Conce-A H011 esdenta
W nd ge.rninaT
The Charles Schwab Gradvate Ri
Center
The Law Schcoi Building wft a Mck cOuTt
The Knight Susincas ManagomOnt CentOf
Completi0q, of a smic upgrade and acmssibi' MY WMOance
projed on Frank Uoyd WrIghfS Hanna House, due to a change
,of use from msWentiai "M to a conference facifity
Sr. plan Chack Engr 2nd Vime-RuIlding Offloial, County Santg
Clara Office Buildings (OSHPD
x1ects indude rNe VallOY SPSCIMW�40d-ic2l
P.Pro,
;3). SuparjoTHO Coud OMOO
, -usa and jurtice, AdminWratiOn 0 , x, Sh*Mrs
stalfions 9nd hoWing fad-IftleS. ekv-tricsl PONV- 9eneFa.tn9 fadrq"",
and r9nwahon of the WS WC Case Grande loo the CmMly P8*S
Departffmnt. Also compWted plan check afvJ inspedon of the Gfty
Gardens arnusement Ps*, the redevelopment of the Mountain Winmy
hW,
.00, property and buildings, and aftmative power generation,
Ass,ociata Plan Cheek Ertglnssr, City Of San 01090, CA
maior projects WOM new resldentW develoPmOnts in ft =mMUniIW4I
of Rancho Pen-OSCIOM II[Orm 92MB, and Rancho E[emwdo- Also
provided non-skuclural revieW for improve,,,neMs to the Balboa Par)(
bulWitVs, she port Authorfty buildings, a;12 -story Bank of ArnarICS
buildlM9 ,any Orm, cc and retail tenant irrprovemOflts. and residenfi
-51
additions.
Move For rd with Confwence
Prof slorW A ttattorta: Andrea Coley I Inspection Task Leader
Swza nento Vbeyaat, n of Andrea has imaged inspects stwff for the list four years_ She
BW irQ Offidalsis a fiatscn, between the Bureau Vefts std and very e>.ifornis
1 (s lsnt� n +G r4+
Juftsdtfons. 's res ns: b lities infuse supervis7bn cf the day-
to-day operOons of the Bureau Verb I pecton staff whc work for
ya rn h p .r �f'ttr l
valil3lsjufisd;,,cfionsinCeiifomig, ShemmsponsibleforseftgUPA
sm9nments f r staff so *,ark at City Building DeparWmnts as w eH
Say hagjp�r (,f the ICC as asstabilslting a-nd maintamineiant rete ions With the Juris-dicti+
and agencies fG ensure that st iff needs we baing ret by quality
i u Charter the 10C and knowledgeable staff. In 2010 and 20141, Anda r ived ft
Outstanding Industry MemberAward for her Offoil, Commii' ent, and
CX -80 dedication to the Sacramento Valley �afiGn of SO&W OfPic;ials.
Achi amen and A rds;: Select Pro eot xporlence;
2010 O ris Wustgy Member Building Departin-ant Sarvioas Manager,, City of West aaOMMOMO
Award ® SVAW Curmn!gy r it nt of c on 'Oor file C3tty of WastSeemm'Onto
and the lislKm twBureau VoDriWs stgff and the Cjty. Frequent,,y
21 i irr9at Member monitors that needs of the City to ensure that staff, is adequately
A rd ,SVA1,,O hiding seMms and exceeding the City's expectations. Assiin
the ma napm t and ordination of bath pian revi and inspection
2" i for ft iii .
Inspection services Manager, Dry C k Ra cheiis= CA
Provides Iraspecton Management ftr the Band of Pomo Indians'Castno
and resort project, TJa finished prmect will totW 1,800,000 stlu f £
and will include €s hotel With 480 mons. The assino will contain 2,
stO< nHu;ines, and wwala have two main card roars. In addWon. t
rewtt welt irtcj-e four restaurants, meeting and mnvenbw faintIttles.
tNO pwis, two i=uz21sP and a fula service health spa. There sTe also
pians for the tonsUuctiw of two nightdU s mo two bars_ There will
be four s ries of subt8"n n pay ing w4h 1,700 parking s is bra
kw
grade.
plan Fteviiaw Services Coordinstar. twatf of UnOOK SUrlingaMe,
Vallejo, Ranches Cordova, & FOISGM, C
Cocrdjinatas w t City Building Officials and plant vie►v staff at
the salveatlas to sigvejvp systems for plan detivery, tr019.
mmmunication, and pmt ra view guidelimm. SOrves 8s printery p"t
of conte begin El-ureau VeNtas and was to ensure plan mvims
and InspsvVons am c rn&ted on UMO. inVOWS is a=rte, and that
Summau dentes is responsive tt*r nes.
_t:35.—
ava Forward v6th Con'Mence
9: 4
CRY of Geste Mesa
Building and Fire Pian Check and inspection
Staffing
rtificati n si ucense. Michael -Mira, CSO I Plan Check Task Evader
Wchael's 32 years of experience indutfeS 26 years Of 9OVeMa c`tt
icc Ceiffied 1340i 0;,5041 service enforcing Federal, State, and legal constructon regulat ons for
residenvat, e'om r al, agr itural, industriel, manufactured housing,
I + rt t�ildir I and accessory stn r : 16 years as a Bui ing Officiale and f t yeam
ac rr�Fn r as a FEMA Flood Plain A dminisM r. He also enfwo9d Wftarnwn Act
ICC , ili i Suring InsPW-GT p rasler►s and SubdWWon Map Acct mguWtons pertinent to building
constfaetl r. His experience in odes personnel management,
i -,c oargtied au.ilrting plans 'buildng deWrtment budgeting and fee arab. He fts mentored
rt nar CSC many staff members who have been suwessful Wer in their camers as
building offi lals, plans eXaMlne-rs, and state and k=1 insPedOrs.
uNding Official and Plana Examiner, Sufte County, C
mthaai enforood appucable Federal, Ste , and ftal C,O"W=don
regu%tions for residential, rr r 1, agnuUural. Irtdu-9081.
r,janufactured housing, and accw+Y st. ettures. Sit 11 years as
FEMAF"PWInAdministm1w, fir,# circ srcrvi i ea e
Damson Act and Subdivision Map Act. Expefience in pemrtirael
managerr$eant and buitding deparMent budgeting and fea analysis -
Suit -ding Official and Plans ExamInOT
Michael proy+d plan reviews for the prWate sector and pro td a
bei intg tat eiei's pure and mal irk hat that only Garay, ]Feet's
cf err nerd experierce could rgodum. Projects incaluded: ft
$240 GalWis gall addition and remodel, the oath Pyr County ]W,
adTrOistrag0n. and minimum security fadlities, a one Mlliien square
foot dishibutkm c entw, the construetiOn Of COMMetcizi Office. medical
office, res a a!,, arW memanlOe buddimis. and reVOW of r idential
master plans rcrr custom residenuai stares. Also Oversaw
consj�ructicn of four-stwjP hotels and a 150,000 square foot Casino With
..: a sevara4ttaryt parking structure.
Move Fo vArwd vdr ..� Confidence
T
He is a two time Past Prsident of the Sa"Mento Valley XsmWton
Professional A ilia tins:
of Suiidirsg Oftats. and Fest 'resident of County Building 0 fficillis
r
of Ce'iito�t a wive the ABO � ►ding induct' Member
a t Pr ie at, I
..
Award its 2W7. He was awarded the CALBO PresWants Award in
in -,Ml President. S amenlo VaEey
1998 and inducted intD the CALBO Hall of Fere W 2005.
eteat Projact Experience.
Past President and Member of Board
Senior Plans Eaaarnlftrs Bureau Veritas, Sacramento, CA
of vjmctcrz. S r ento VaVa �y
Michael p-sevides plea revue of commefdal, Industr10% residential, and
of Building OfWaI5
agftulturai strtrtims for ompliance wl'Lh lntern+ational arrd Cait'Omia
(SVA, -80)
no"truotuMj Code regerrer'r Bents. Reviews lndudes building fire -He
safely, energy, eie 1, plumbing, mechanical, and a €sible �e
r Industry Member �f Year
regaairements of 9CC. T 24 CCR, and ANSI Al 171, Experienc
SVARO
it tides btasinm and medical office structures. general pirpose
national taborstones, schools, jails, M&OOms, milt ry trausir-9,
rasi+dentiel single and multi-faanity structures, residential master plan:8,
industrial, and agricultural building-$.
uNding Official and Plana Examiner, Sufte County, C
mthaai enforood appucable Federal, Ste , and ftal C,O"W=don
regu%tions for residential, rr r 1, agnuUural. Irtdu-9081.
r,janufactured housing, and accw+Y st. ettures. Sit 11 years as
FEMAF"PWInAdministm1w, fir,# circ srcrvi i ea e
Damson Act and Subdivision Map Act. Expefience in pemrtirael
managerr$eant and buitding deparMent budgeting and fea analysis -
Suit -ding Official and Plans ExamInOT
Michael proy+d plan reviews for the prWate sector and pro td a
bei intg tat eiei's pure and mal irk hat that only Garay, ]Feet's
cf err nerd experierce could rgodum. Projects incaluded: ft
$240 GalWis gall addition and remodel, the oath Pyr County ]W,
adTrOistrag0n. and minimum security fadlities, a one Mlliien square
foot dishibutkm c entw, the construetiOn Of COMMetcizi Office. medical
office, res a a!,, arW memanlOe buddimis. and reVOW of r idential
master plans rcrr custom residenuai stares. Also Oversaw
consj�ructicn of four-stwjP hotels and a 150,000 square foot Casino With
..: a sevara4ttaryt parking structure.
Move Fo vArwd vdr ..� Confidence
T
Rugistunud CA St-udura�, Engineer Dansl has over 25 years of experience as a StructurOl Plan Ctma
Engineer and has pmvide-d plan reviews for valnum Southern
moist CA C.MR Engineer Catillofnia Agenciors- He specMizes in enfdnq vari= building and
# 40M State oodes for msWefta�cm. rnercial, OrW IndUSM81 buildings ftt
Feel
Ore interaction between ang-ineem. wchiteCtg. CO, and
WA Smx:wral EfIginmr owners. Oan&al 8150 hOs experience mviewing plans from a fire and
#S34081 r& &sfety, disabW ams, and aft energy and UVRIes standOnt.
wA ckvi4 engineer "w Project Experience.
#C34W1 Senkw Structural PIOV Check Enginee.r. Bumau We"s,
Saemmento
AZ SMW-tural ErtgMW ROVMWS am+,itecturaj and structural plans and speciftatiOns from a
# 52691D life and safety and anger ring standPOInt to ensure comoliance with
fttural Ertnr ;at apigicable codes and regulaftms fcr fire and IntsafatY, structural
H) ucgsee
#S8824 Integfity, disaWed accass, energy and utiftes requlremegItS,
Oft,01
Senior Stru-aWral E t1ginear, city of Dana Point, CA
Served as division head WM!n SuMing and SaletY. Reviewed plans
I170-5
and Wicked calculations foTC0mPb0x stone—buil residentiM hOMM
ICC Cerfi-fied w4mg Fens
ngs, and earth-WaWing s1ructums. pal
ommercial WWI: , ommd
Examiner - i 785
O=plex pan Taviews of found ton systOM MOOMOtang caissons.
utifizing 'PAW 000rating sYstsm to an8lYzQ
MC Oad B"'Ming PI -3`35
Wrote softaTe prograrns
,oncrete retaining walls and cast -in -p - n 0
Masonqjc lary concrete a ch rs
Exaffr-ner CBC -10670&§
peTACJ 3J"5appendix D. ROSPOrdEdt0inquiries lTomengin eers,
OTchfteds, and the general public MgaWing Interpretation o! technical
LEED Green Assoc ate
code mq1firements and City wdinanoes, MwAed Inspection staff
in reWving djff[=R field candiVons. Provided Ovet-the-wunter plan
=rdinated and expedited plan check activitieS
checks when needed'
vioth other departments 8M outside agencies, Designed 1,pote'and
retaining wall structures IcT Publim Works as required., CwWuCWd
tnhrtical Seminam for ft qO,1eTW publIc, Responsible for all sural
plan reviews. Assisted In the INP-OMWY SM4 Ocoass7lbflity Faview Of
Plans..
Seniorplan Check Engineer, CIV of H_Untington EWach, CA
Rem 'ed afchijaclu� and strucvjral Omns and specificat-ons frorr
a Iffe and safety, and engineering standont to ensure COMOance
and reguloons loz, fire and Ne SOW
with ell applXable codes
Ries i
Integrity. disabled aeras, energy, and UV requ�rements.
structural
Performed hvhiy m3ponsible prGfesacant a-1 wo* in checking designs
x1rial buildings- Consuled with
adL
for Mskle-ritial, cornn*rcial od ln
architects, engineers, corArzctorsa and owners mgarding m0ers su&
buftng plans anW
as design, ang2neenra, and M90RUCAS governin
construction.
Wove Forward vvvA ConSdence
MM
rtlfi tiorks/ License Sid Damn ah, PE, CBO, CASp, SECS, MS
Professional CA CW Erineer -
Senior Flan Check EngineerC 41h As a rtiftkd Bul inn offrN4,qt and Mistered Professmnal Engineer
ICC cewwd Bu in offleal - Sid has over 30 years of full'=#ime municipal eogir ring experience
5216932 serving major matropotitan local qwmrnmental agenwitm in Soulhem
C€ii lfoMIS.
]CC svwmg P12ns Exam - r n
5218932 select Project Expedence.
CBC Cemfkid Plar►s Exam ner y S ntor ,8" Check Engineer, Bureau Veritas, Sacramento, CA
6218932 i e porn i for wAsw and approval on ft foftwing pro**%:
providing mechanical. a° , ptur�bd , an a�ssblity uri c on
�actur Fv'� ar tl i a sycuan Casino Expansion. This project includes a 14as Casino
Board cotlifio suer ute: iml, entertainment, dft, pubfic and back of douse
CASPWred AOWSpedaW spacers., and a 5-fier parking sbucturm
DSA Chief Plan Check engineer, City of Palmdale, CA
Professional AMVatl ansr Served 16 yeam as the Chief Plan chwk Englnaar and as an
Altemate Building OffrcW for the City of Pairr►491M t in'dud0d
intern.alio :l Ca�nafererKm or Building City Hall oonstrudions, Ott i i n trudo on% M jo? me dical
+F Is f �iiiti�s, nurne is IndusWal and WMI'Mi-cial projects, and r idantial
housing IMS, as well as roomer additions and single-€arnilY dwelling
r,alifomla Build Is modillcafims. Involved in review and aWovat of UPI.W Statm icier
atm ° r l la:n i rs l=otus projects fair ttm rrsa �l command In Mei 1 Air Fo Base n
iidtar vt Enli mens l�al�le. Proja in iud buildinghousing F22, F35, and aC130-
Represented thO bl uilding department irta the developing advisory board.
Aar, 4rz, n cxiaty of CMM Engineers
PEan Check Engineer, Ciby of Ontario, CA
Ar.wrican Com to .irksMute Responsible for firie reviww of consu uction documents for fiFe stations
and major municipal pmjocts such as the rn[Mon Ontario .fli rt
Pre concrele 91rislituW expansion profi t: Other projects included review and appM81 of
numerous millim. square foot distfttgtion warehouses, incluc ir43 an
interr9a rnd�tivn of F -t ri l $80 million n Cwt -Cola nwufecturar and major FOSWIr� IS4 tis w8r, as
]nape --I= sarrg�family dwoliir and ram additions, i preraa rftd the City's
building department In the tc hn i adv `rr free.
a
a
Move Fanwwd with Confide -nee
CoMficationiO Ulcomm: Alan Ho, SE I Structural Plan Cheok Engineer
M.S., CWH Engineoft
CaMbmals Vots UrOwnft.
xan L,, an experience strucWrat plan check enginears wah over 27
swramrft
years of experience in ft Indus", He has exlensive exporience
providing Wan reviews for various federal, PrMM arW Mildary buiWings
B -S., CM EpqFneering
California State University,
and Is profid*at In ETABS, SAP2MD and STAAD program. miag used
to design buildings and bridges. yrs is also expertly certMed in plan
specific calzu?atians, reviews and response: . diM96nO and buildin
�ishrod CA CIA! ENMM
Water structums and brif;lgeg, construcUon and investgabon reporting,
rF,42260
and LEED designing WWI consulfMg-
(Exp. 3-31-2012)
Ragis'Mad CA StwelumJ Enginew,
Select project Expede"re.
SE3551
(F -V- "' '-2"2)
Sural Engfnw, Kitchall CEM
KV sh4o"Q en!#MW
ed plan revivvs, r�ficatlons and calculatiorl
Performstructural pspe
rime" per Calift mis DSA fequimments for ft CA Dept of
(fFxp, 15--n-2013)
Corrections and Reh-abifitation stafte prison wastewater treatmOt
plants at Cen*Wfs, Tracy, Comoran, Ke m Valley and We Creek, X
OR Sw=himt Engin
provided building design aWysls and retwft wM RISA 3-D analysis
SFJPE17442
'n Msmolf and erg bWdirg.
or the Carifomia DSA state piSo
(Exp. 6-3D;2013)
Cam-pWtad structural crit a and plan reviews, -shop draw-ings, Rfl,
RFC and TIO reV'ews on behalf of the OSHPD for the $220 f0ion
AR Profession En&eer
Calftmia Department of Voterans Affairs Corn, Ptaxes in Redding and
PE11916
Fresno, A. PaTfonrned OSMPD structural criteria and plan reviews W
1S t. 12-31-2011)
the CDC R Calillafnia Heart Care Fadrdy and Dewitt Nelson Medical
X Prokswoh2j EngirleeT
conversitm Cenlet in Stockton, C.A. Xso enhanced CDCR autpationt
PP -54281
Prograrn buildings at CMF, CIM, fill SR SAC, LAO and COR.
e-30-2013)
Structural Engineer, Vj" Pr idem, Crommmll Architects-
LEEDA=ediled PnOOS,100nal
EngineeTs IM
Deslg.ned prujee-,s for military commisamns, Including six control
DSA C-mbfied SUUMMI Mv
towers for U,S, ,sir Fame aiMwts. buftngs 8nd hOsPimls in U -S.,
Japan and KaTea. AW dasVned fademl buildings wtth DOD Uniffod
DSA Certified Acom Rev7comf
FqcjJWms criftria and Wast and pm9ressiva col4pse requitaimnts.
Coordinaled designs and plan reviews; wilb in-bouse stat architects.
MI FIp engineers and crwyltg. other projects including ft $65n1filion.
12-Woq jack son StephanS SPxPO ", Neurosdances Institute at the
UniversKy of Arkams Medmal Sewices. the $96 nliffiOn CO3COM Amy
52MWIS in Fort Sragg, NC and. the $35 mill rt Anny Awation FadRty
which Imiudes the Largest helicopter hanger in the U.&
g.
',-,,mr1dePcO
foove Formrd Mh
Ci —
City of Costa mesa
Building and Fire Plan Check and Inspection
stoffing
ons? Lf c ens e Thames Trfmberger, PE, CBO I Mechanical Plan Check
Enalneer
gistered CA Mechanical Engineer
R&
# 26359
Thomas has extensive experience with more than 21 yeam, I-athe
icc Suital" Pgana Eke mirter
building and safety industry. He has also been invo� ved with CEC
energy standards development for six years and has expenence vAth
jr,c Cedifted meaenical Inspe0or
LEED,-aviaw. He is a cerfifted Garen BuNing Professional-
�CC Me&,mn=l Rlans Exw-,Jrwr
Select PtOject ExPeriencO:
= Rumbing trispeclar UPC
mochanteal man Check Enginew, lvanpah Solar Genaraftg
stffrion,
JCC Ctethad lm=hamaal Code
affightsource Energy
L=tad on 3-60 aces of U - S. SLM mwWgled lXW 'In s0ulha4stern
t -0C CarNed Su4dmg Oftml
Calftmin, the Ivenpah So$ar EtWft Gerwrating System (ISEGS)
is a 392MW War thermal Pow -or fooffitY. ThO PTOI-ad uscs MiffGfz
[CC C,,rjjf�d &0 i lin t:^ r
to fo= Me pcwer of the sun on, sotar m=ivars atop 460 ft power
UMC
towers. Tia compf.ex is comprised ctf three separate Pians and will use
erjolSource Energys LPT W teOnoNy, Thm War arrays consist
&CC Cetfifmd PWrnbing �MPeMr
of thwisands of software- cint mtled miffm ba&wg the sun in two
dimensions and reflecting the sunlight to a bofter that sats at, a tower -
ICC PlumbUV PWS ExamifW
When the concentated sunlight strikes the boiter's pipes, it heSIS the
water inside to 55WC —re than 1,000r� F --cmsting superheated
[CC Cer0ed Piumbi CodaOff4W
no
steam at the fpr tum necessary to e the indus's highest
opffratng effidenr�a& This high 4empeMW.-Te s%am is the Oilped
Wwtemd Non-Res4mtial Er/argy
from thea boiler to a standard �turbine Wwre eledr6tY is generated.
Pt rt Examiner
Hata ion of the project Is antivApated to be comWmted in the fest
Cortifted Green Bu--' ung Pmfe. JOrtalquarte'r.of
2012.
LSED A=edltod PWOSS-10nW Mechanical Plan Cheek Engineer, Gen"s 301ar EnGrgY
The project consists of Wo rode per4ent sofar ekKA& genefating
Tot -a' aualvest facitities with a nominal net e�e� output of 125 rnegawatts (PAW)
ea&4 for a total net &%ctrical output: of 250 MW- F_1ectrkla! per will
Professional Afffliations' be produced using steam turbine generatom. fed from saar steam
Califmn4l i eta d ng
qenemtws. The =ftr steam generators moDive heated transfOr fluid
Standards Comff fA57W 1999-20N from so4or thermal equipment comprised of nays Of palabcft lyfinws
CALBO that cormat energy kum the sun.
SaW-04MM ValkqAssro�Von at
gung al is (SvAgo) Chief Building Offl;tlal. CKY Of Rant hO COrdOV8. CA
Ameftan Society of FqumcUllag Oversaw ail aspects of b0ding and safety, including n review,
Enf:nem "ffni,, jwuanoe, Reld jrmpeaion, CVlrplagnts and ofaticns, bus�nzss
Rancho Cordova Chtrnber of licen;so Inspodicam, staff ing, and bud -gating. RwioponsiWS fW4 the
Commerce establishment of the now Sui�ding and 80.0ty 0epa:r4rnent for the City,
Warnalwna� C4�da cound (tcc)
Naffona� FTe PNV.ed�on A&wdafion
Move Fwwafd W"th canfidanw
cEat y of costa mesa
Building and Fire. Plan Check and Inspection
Staffing
Cer"nbcnsl Ucanse. David BaAholo rnew, ME I Plan Check Enginaer
E
- 0 ftred Professiona'� ngineet with over twon1h, years
CA R09IStered 1wil Enghger David is a regi
#37373 of Industry expeekence in building code plan reVimy, structW.-4 and
rnechanical building code Interprelation, value engiftwd-R9, and CiVl,
CA pggWwad Mechan=1 Engirmr Structural, Fire P-rotection, Plumbing, and Marharticat dftigl,
K RegWeved Cil F-n:gf rmw # PF-- SOI'Rct Project Experience,
Mech Plan Check Eng; Wanpah Solar GeneraUng Station
-S- BUM managOd land in sOuftwast8m
Hl mMachar; M DY 1-ccated an 3.60 aaes of U
EM40 California, the wanpah Solar EWdft, GenefaOng SM Ysta,, (96E
06 PASM@d Aw
g pE-11813 lsa 39M,, W Solar ftrrnal power facift. Tha project US eS Mirrors
to fWus the power of ft sun on Solar =Q;vors atop 460 ft power
prpfia$Evndl Afffilations: towers. Tfm complax &s camp of three separate plans and VAIs use
BrightScurm Energy's LPT 650 techftagy, The War QfraYs consist
Internaftnal coftowuttzil (10 0) of 1housands of software-conbVled mirrors tfaCkirg ft sun in bNo
ta a Wier that sib atop a ter
'fin
and refiecOng the sunAgM
'When the WnCenb-8*d Sunlight st6kes .be WW's piles p it heats the
water inside to 55WC ----mwB Than 1,oOT F --rmaft supoth, sated
steam at the twnperalure necessary to achieve the indusWS highest!
01mrating efficienwas. Th s high- emperature steam is piped ftm the
bolt6n to a standard turbine where ejectft�ty is gonesaWd. CDnstrucfibn
of the pTq;,-ect is an gated to be comptad tr, the last quOTtOT of 2012.
Mechanical Plan Check Engineer, +h is Solar Energy
The pm.JW consists cif two iadePenftnt WRI Okhlric generating
ftoijlWs With a nomina-1 net electric outputOf 126 M9WNW;S (W
each, for a total no-tebectrical output of 250 MW El�icsl POW OF WRI
be produced usjrg swam twne gommtorz led frorr. solar Steam
generators. The solar steam Sane to rewlvQ heated "'Isfer fluid
frOM SOJaF 91OFT001 equipment comprised 01 armys of pa,,-sWic mirrors
that called enemy from the surf.
plan Chook Eneirmy, GWF Tracy, City Of Tracy- CA
GwF Energy will t theQdsfjnq rmcy Pea Plant bY =vW141
eta etsfinig tcvi+,y into a combiredGle _qWirer plant with 1451
of additional ganQmting capadtyks project consists of the powtr
pmant, an 4onsite, 230 W switclTya-Td, W onaRe natural gas SUP941Y
interconnaMon. an appmximately 1,47VOOt WOW SUPOY Piperim
endimpTovements to an e)(isting did 8OW55 read,
mech Plan Check Ent, HuMbOldt SAY RGPOwcn 'ng pr*J*ct
peftrn-md machanical Mview f0t the, WnSVW4iO'11 Of the 163 MW
gen,ergdngcaps;;�Jty p*vter station- The HSG S is a toad RAWWing
power plant consisft Of 10 natural gas-firad W&RUNd a 8V.50DF 16.3
MW redprocafing engirt- en sets and associated equipment
move Forward with CnnfidWOO
H
-Cor0oadonsl Utornse: Cristian Son, PE I Electrical Plan Check Engineer
PE in El� Engiabefing. Cris-fian has over 20 years of expegiOnce as an E' uitat Engineer
Raft*�nm W*Tklng 04, Vqri*US projects. tris expemm* and tr8ining includes
eledlical plan review kw pow plAnts and complex industrial 12CRAIM
CA Regratwed Efical Enkneef clectrical engine+ ng design for corrinwroial fadRieS, MdOntial
.1 10 structures, and Wsting of powered, equip=nt. Cfttian perform oode
AZ RegiWated projLgssionai Eaginwr compliance Van mview servioas and is sWed h electrarnechantal
Omer "Uiplrent review.
NV ROW15ter0d PrO�ftsl
'SO'*r-t Pr*JR'Ct EXPRT'Onc*-.
E,O*WCaI plan Ch at EngineSt, Iva npah Solar Gerwrating Station,
87ightsOurce Energy
lel p€ Prdesstorwl Eng'nftr
Located on 3,60 =Gs of U.S, BL M managed land in -A Masts
gistafed
#14016
Ca-litomis, rne lvanpah Solar EW.ft GO-neMbrig Sys -tam (ISEGS)
is a 392MW solar therrnal power f�dllty. The project uses IMuOrs
profinsional Affills ns'
10 focus the power of the sun an War TOWIVOrS stop 460 it power
uwmrs- The complex is cornpiised of three sepamle Plans and will use
IEEE
NEPA
erightSoufw Energy's LP's 56-0 twltirtotogy. The solar arrays consist
MOMW Inatme of E*Mficala?W
of thousaads of soft ware -conitotled Min -o7 -s tmckinq the sun In two
F-learonle ErWneers
dirnefttOPM 8nd reflecUng the sunlight to a boftr that 64S 81*9 a Wwer�
�
-, healts the
VVhen th-a concentrated sunUght strikes the WWS POM d
Member,N M-icaal Fire Protacuon
water inside to 550!'C --more than 1, rt F --creating superheated
Asswlatvon
steam at the temperature noomary to =Weve the industys highest
operatktg efficiat-des, This 'high-ternparatum StOam is the piped
Member, J,Acfrmtianal Aw=aliotl of
Gj � ted
fry thm bailer to a standard turbine where elOCW V rls gen"
&WricalUmpo-dufs
Construction of the pn*end is anticcipated to be mplated in the last
quaner of 2012,
Electical Plan Check Enginn, eqnWs Solar Energy
The project C*4SWM Of two Independent solar electrsc genera OrIg
fa6jaWO a nangnaj not eieoutput of 125 Megan wattS (NIW)
each, for a total rml e�t I output c.f M MW, DaeWcal pouier wili
bg produced using sWarra turbine generators fed from sdar stearn
generators. The saEar stearrigeneralors r�e hated transfer fluid
ftom solar thermal equipmen
.prised of arrgys of parabokc M,,rmm
,Igt colted energy fmm the sun-
EJ;ectlical Plan Chook Engineer, CItY Of Vftst Sec ramento, CA
Provided electrical plan review ser to -ShOO MCC Upgrade. WEA,
PV solar, EmultKh Tank Add Ion, and West Sacramento AFC,
ElazWeal Ran ChOCk ERSIVIOU, CItY Of OU73'ngamol CA
Pre id ejectr,
,�l pin rew-ew servims to CGffee Shop., TIs,
Compaszlon Center, BmW, a medical buittling and tiffi e. shopping
buildj,n, fitness ="SHPD, and a SBX Corridor.
Movp Forward with GanWF-MOF
01ty of Costa Mesa
Building and Fire Plan Check and Inspection
Staffing.
CanfficaEonsf Llcense� David Gavrantch, EFT I ICC CerMad Plans Chookor
David has over 15 years of experience providing structural ravitma to a
�cfions in California and Washington 8 te. H
9CC Cwffmd Building Pit= large number of Jvfisd, to He is
Examiner an Engineer in Training and Is an ICC Cerl&W Pians Examiller,
Cert CAL Gruen Plans
lir
CA Engirmer Js� Tr*qing
Affiftfians,
Structufal Engineers Assc6afion of
-ftern C94ornia (SEAONC)
select proloct Experienem.
= Ctrflfiod Plans Examiner, Bureau VarRas, Sacramento, CA
Responsible fQr providing plan mviww for commurcial stn='Njra<
g Mf la
bulging plans and *udural calculaucni; for COMP40nce 4h th
Unit-Tm and Cakfomia Bulling Codes. The types of Wildings
mvkmed include single and mult-story wood, concrete filt-up, CW
:$Wale and pro-amnufacturcid sties buildinp. David also conducts
plan reviom Jbr ftwer and Energy projects W compfierim mft,
the CaajfGmia Building CWe. All Pm-mr and EneTgy PmJeM were
mviewed using electronic pian mvimw methods.
LF-Eni Reviewer, United States Omen SW1.4ingCam�nalfl (USOBC)
Responsibte for prrovidirkg (LEED) reviews for building attem-pling
to receive oaftfication. The reviews include now construdion and
major renovation, =e anti shall devolopmsM, and scNWs- Reviews
vefffy ftt each building fs in cordo", ance wft Me appropriale LEER
reference guides.
Fort Le :s Town 40on - Suildines 23 and 24, City of Fort Lo
provMed structural plan review for the Fort Lewis Town Center -
Buildings 23 and 24 located in Fort Lewis, A. Each building was a
four-story, 14,11 g square foot m)ced used Commercial and tesidartial
buiWina, The first flow, oommere f 8 0=pz", , was con.structed Of
concMe shearwaft, steel framing. and fight gouge sal ire -lits framing.
The upper thme kors, residential R2 =-upncy, ware cded of
wood modular units that we fabdWeO in a factory and trarmponed to
the ate viia truck and iftatalW by canes,
lrfls Camp Golf Lodge, To of Truckee, CA
The Lodge is a three-$dOrY, V0,388 squam fool 8.1tucture thW, contains
'carious amnities incktdiog man's and women's to*er rooms, The
challenging foundation was buJit on a sloping site that consisted of
rock> Since the rock was difficult to excavate in rnuft'-13 areas, many
foundations and reta-Wng waft required daw0rM and pinning into the
rock.
Kusa en ratting aftfien, My ol Coluss, CA
The type of stfudums i=Wdad temporary and permanent buildings
and structtims, large equipment platform, cable tray supPart
structures, artd indust
fial type Tnechanical equipment suppwt
structures. The vadous structures were pre -manufactured steel
J
buildings, pro-fabfiwted modular buildings, steel framed StfUdure-S,
and cDncrete,
v.
Move forwa�,,d *Jh Confidence
CanificaVonol License, Rick Mauldin I Building Plans Examiner
Rtk is askHted Plans Examiner and lnsfor major nr4jtt
ICC A=SS--b-Aity 1n$P1MWT 4, Pl�'t'8 disdpline and multi-leve.1 building projects, known for provi&nq
mrJusiva plan examinations and svppon to Felaw co-vx*ers and
ICC -93, Building Plans Examiner vatiorus Jufisdictona< buildina staff. As a Eldifein Official, Senior Plans
Examiner and Senior lnr4mctor, has, 37 years of management,
tCC-60, Building Mans Exw-alner ii n, contracting. buitdingirspe&an. and building coft
UBC cc' mpiiawm review expedenm. irmluding expeftace with both a city
aWncy and the private saclmr. He has comWated compeex mVews
c8c SAding Pia"Is Exan"Iris of a varfiAy Gf pro irduding Fire stations. in and autdoor
m0s, mulfr-Mry pa*inq stnictutes, hoWA and motels, various
ACC -81„ 82 & 85, Corirnvcial collutar towers, es al distribuffon systems, pvoltaic Sys-xxras,
kesMentlal Swilding lnsp=W mechanical systems, plumbing system, muWavel com"�Tdsl
=-10. auilding Inspector UBC establishments, various restavwts and 16st food bvikiing% medical
and dent W off=s, o m-mero" al smimming pools, mixed usa cempancy
CBC C4-mnw-roial &ROS:40rrtial buitd-ings, mufti -family buildiqp. sirigle and mWO-gaval sjngW.-fWWy
auffid-ing ins for dvWflngs and sift dvfl review for site a=ssNfty access. He is also
. pep extrernalty orgariLmd and professional when managing several large
ICC-pl. p? & p5, v.�orrim , ac
, urial a pxw, its and working with c6erft.
ResWenfinl Plumbing InspeMor
APM0 Plumbing Inspector Select Project Experience.
cpf, cornmercW & Rezcwerftl Buildlog Pians Examiner, City of Roseville, CA
Piumbing I Wector Through Bureau Veritas Rick provides, plan mview seNims to the City
of Rosevifle. Projects 4H%da mstsurant TI, rcandle Ti. and otheT
,cc
l,:& m5, co -n projects_
, _m.
.,42 m7 Foornrnercja�
.� w
�r�al 4
Residential Mei;banical iWed, or
Building ficial, City of Oravige, CA
1APMOMechanical frtspector Projects of Ow City of Oraville included aSonk�,Restaurant and the
Orovft Transit Stallon,
Cid' C,Cumrmrda1 & Rezadanftl
Mechanical InforSentor Plans ExarninerlSenior Building Inspector, Wilidan
=-El, E2 & ES, Camwiffdal & Enginoeying,
Reshi4rnfial EkCti=1 Inspacwt Commemiall Ptans Examiner, City of Folsom, CA
mmeral wanll i. for the City of lism included: Patla&D Mall Suild�ngs,
CE -c Cacia ptesiaP"Vectr Fo
ale&1cal In.sp*cW hm;[Winq a tvm-aiomy parking stnixtm, the UC- Davis -ray Town, a
four-sloq parking sRucture arid mixed use bu0cling, a Nextel cel,4sita. a
=�ca. CAmbinalion inspoctm Sed, Bath, and Beyond large box re it store, several Fri and Easy
0000mia Codes CorrimwdaM stamso the Folsom Fire Station, the LDS Church, a diaWs 0nic, and
,&1;kmdentW On"507 an 88,WO square f*ot Mwlcury Insura-am Tenant trnWovemnt.
Calffamia Codes CombinaWn Building fns pmtor, Plans Examiner, and Acting Building Official,
Inspector city of Seaside, CA
Ce*t&ad green Building Praft,,Wmnal
CorUrWd Oman Points Rater (CGFIR) Building Inspector and Plans Examiner, City of Susanville, CA
ad
Move FoNord wilh C(Mrkkf10a
1 AA
Cer0ficationst Limnsa: Tim SuBivan, PE I Plan Check Engineer
Tim has over 40 years of experie=e in b0d3ing safety serVches-
CA Registered Chfil Engineer- He, served the City of Sa=8MGM0 fOf MOD9 MOM 15 Years in ft
#20114 capacity of plan Review In r, Building Offi6al, and Ch -W BUIMIftV
OR Reowwed Engineer. 47580 Inspecton He also taught the SuNdin Code at as local cDfte for 16
yearn. nm has several years of experience perfwminq fire rife Wely
Teview fear all types of W-1d4t9s lnclud�Mq commercW 1*jh-rise review-
CALSO Bu*ft -
Praftssional Affiliations.
Selt
Plan Review Enghnser, Cfty of WeSt Satr=SMO
S truaWgal EjViftem AAS0640M, 01
Ttrn is respor sible for proVAi�,19 engineering pLan reviews for the
Contmi Uftmfa (-SF-ACC)
City of ft st Sawamento for commerciaL Indusidal and residential
projects, Some rownt prciects Bud he has revj� ind.ude tho Pail of
Munber, ExisNag Bui3 mgs
S8=rn9n10 expai-W4n, Nugget market, SGuthpwt Shopping Center, 3
Commmee, Code Committee
City fire stews, several townhowe PrayJOCU. and the now City of Wast
A
Inw—ftation al cwfwenoe of Building
Sacramento City HOW
en-girundng Consultant
cALBo
PmvkWd MASON wrvjcm for Issues Fagaraing the bub di Code,
stnwhffai design, exptl wdnem and plan review. Acted as code
Memlmt, HislwiCal BuildlrV CO"
300OW
numerous comrdal projects Ind ft ,
consultant or, numa
Commtt""
sq. % Cache Creek €ndian Gambling Cas9no. St. Clair's Church ip
Roseville, the Hall of Justice In SwameMO, the QUM "ging Center
Sa*-&TrRnko Wsley Q=Wr of lCaO
on Stacktion, to name a few, Provided p;an resew sew icas F.0-7
'g rata County, EFk Grove Unified Sch-wl, and CAYof S=TZIMOMD
in pto*,cts such as ft Cathedral of Bd Renovation, and a 25
story office building near the COP,
Tony's Fine Foods I Plan Review Engineer, CRY Of West
sacram ento 52 foot high
OW aural Sffd He safetY fear a
ProVided Plal reVIfOr st
squwa f StOrags %CrNTY With ButOM8W Cfafms
Fire Station I Plan Review Enolnear, City of West Sacramento
Provided Plan review for StTuCtUral-ax9sSibirdy and life safety for 2
idly fire staWns vafued at $4 milffori e0ch.
Cache Cmek Intflan Casino and ROS01t I 8-04M Offirlal, RUMSBY
Tdbal Gaming Agency
Pruivided building Offi" and plan review WTVices fur the 295,000
Square foot casono valued at $300,000,000, With 200_quest rooms.
this Type t FR SPR structure has a potential occupancy 1=d of a
t,o,Wo people. The comple-x also incl ides a 12,GG0 square foot SPS
fdc#ity. The project also included a IXW-spaCa. 6-st0fY Parking
garage, 0V,- Maw p! an faview and inspection acWlfts,
.
' Vat Moue Fa". ard mar, Gonl; d -ence
— A(: —
sw-'�T
Cerfificationsf Llcanse: Lawrence Leonard, AIA J Building Plans Examiner
UrRed Smtes Ak Force, Chanute Lawrenoe has over 2-0 years of experie.1108 in thO Wlftg Ind- try
AFB I-Ilinois, jW. Ergine Tothnim' soving as building inspector, assiWantbuft.- ng official, and design
De Araa College - AA LVs�gn 'Fch;,tW for projects throughout ft. stMe.
LicanmW xmh'100. slarte of Callomlia Setect Project Experience*
=0,80 supervising Building Inspector, City of Gmss Valley
Resporsiibte for bbl ng ftpe:ti on, plan revi-aw and buiVing official
Rered ArWitect State Ufa ona dufteSinduding building code intemretaton, erforcement and dty
27258 pojjc�es. Pruled manager for dty projects,
Re&stered D4wler BUW
AssIsUnt Building Official. C-4 of es Vila
Inspwor Stme ofCa�,brnla SAOSI 7
Res;=sible forbu-P§depaTUneflt *perafiOM indudvnQ th-8 POrml
center, plan review, permit techn4aros. sdmini&afive and plan review
JCC SuOiP12ns xMimir
ng E
staff. auties Induded city poflcliBs and procedures, ICC s=mditaWn
and peal manwiet fag 04 Pi'djects .
Proftssional
Prolect ArchiteclIDIrseear of Healthcare FacllftWa Planning, J.
Sacm,-mnto Vailey Awxdwion of
Arthur G*mmal & Assaus I HMC Group
Building Officials - Pam Pre skleffl
Respmlslbte for the management of all healthcare pgqjsrts, cftn% and
20,35, -Orld 20M
staff for the Saaamento Office. Maftting, ckent contracLs, man haur
budgets, technical staffing and cofmtroctlon p.mleet management
Inle-malional Code Council
Principal Architect Leonard Archftects + Plannem
Amttiza.n IneWule of AmNIOCIs
Pro". ad amhftedural services for clierft in,6uding Unhmrsity of
Calffomia. Davis Mad-ical Center, Saint it a.Is Reg onal WO;at
Center, Reno, Nevada aWng with tmmrcial and cusWmi reskierdial
bulkiers and tegal expel fag constructiOn claim=,
Move For *fflh Corr erre
-1-4(0-
ROW,skMd CA OvIiI iIIW Latch -r has more than 14 ya", of exWanoe as a Plan ChGOW
C68700 Civil EnMneer it enlphas m struOwra% arcNectural, fireffite safety.
I= Oertmed a.uiwhg Rars arA accessiWIty plan reviewbuild'Migs and structures. Ho has
Examimr - SOSSM comprehensive knowledge of, CA 30d-ing. Codes (COC), International
Building Ctxlas (OC), X*Twricares Wits Aot (ADA). CaIDAG,
,�;C Certftd A=MW -06, ACI -38,. NDS, XSC Manual,
'jity ln$poj�aod CaflfornL9 EnergY Standards, ASCF7
and other nabonWly r=qifized standards. ¢n addMon. he her, CMC,
CEC, and CPC knowledge, Latchezar's slouctural and architectural
LEER A=ediied Pro.11azzicim] design expo(once encmripassstm both commexiW' anti residential
buildings In�OW,1,9 OD=ete, stW� and fight frame wood struCtUMS.
Pto$a"ional Affifiatcns'. He has knowW99 of sVuctural analyV4 softara SAP20= RISA30.
WOMOWW-'Coft Courwit (ICC) Enarcalz, and draffirfla SkillS-AUIOCAD-
Nation al Fire Fmlei*on A$304�.a1 on SeWct PrqJ**t Experience.
(NFFA) Senior Plan Check EngineeT, Suffingarne, CA
Latchez4w provides in-house plan review engineering for ft Oty
Contact tflfonylaVon, of Buttingame, CA, Projqds include resideneal now 00TWtruction,
rasidenW additions, Commercial new =,mtruction, and commercial
T 9416.725,4200 tenant impmvemants (TI),
IsIchuzar, mdsw-,-;P, us. LtureauverU S- Senior PI -an Check Engineer
cc -in He supervsed and plan checked complex comraw6al and TvsidontW
proleds (Structural, =hit elctuml' W.AmbRy, OnGTOY, mechanical,
pturnbliffg, etactric-Al reviews), Invot'ved in overall process of work
pelforman,00jeffectiveness improverne-rds.
Plan Check Engineer, Private $9,Ctor
Latchozar PrDvIded the War. revo-ew of buildings and structures
(structuml, arohftecWral, and aemssibility), stab Management and
. OW
,upqrvWon of junior engineers and technical assfstan-ce, WOrlkR
distribufion, building permit/plan ched fim asti=Jes, participated
�n company meeW98 TeWdfng Office perfbnTkwca, effa*tive
Management teC;Wques, and orgonizational issues
Plan Ch9CkGVWuTaI Design Enginser, Private SOCt
ctural deOgf; of buildings
Latchawr completed Ow pfar, come and stn,
and stftmWres under supe evews.vin of licansed structural engineers and
plan mvisor in California and Arizona Building Codes and Standards
;Icatkm in Plan f6view pr ss.
comprehansfNe 4Wdy and apg'�
Oonfi&-nm-
Gert rallons1 I-Ectnao: StephenWIst, CASp I Plans Sxaminer
Runs Examiner Stephen has 8 yrs of plan review ear Nence, in ding 6 years
21 0-60 G1 jurisdic9onal experlence, third party expedited plan review, arab
r esid rpt W and com,,mrcial ply ro+ a. Stephen has done awass
CertWw,d As p t gip# evaluation of muftiple corr iW bulid s in the Sacrarnerdo area,
393 and is capabW of peTbTMiFQ Are aPd 1 Wumbirgr mechanic ,
e%eWcal, and atTuctural revue on both cornmemial and reaidantial
structures_ Stephen also has is years of axpeftnce es an ex tine
rim pe l li'.�r qlts prep. foeVpa. Stic eye . and rwd
e-inct Projeot Experience=
Senior Plans Examiner, au;reau Verfts, Sacramento, CA
Plan nevi °i of emmemial, msidential besftags IOr ph ar
with lift niq strudural arW n - tructuml code requirenumft,
Rem Includes bukling fire4ft safety, energy, eiectrical,, plumbing,
niedhanical, and accessibte code requiremeft of ICC,Title 24 CCR,
and ANSI Alt i.1 _ Experience includes business and medicat efface
structums, residential ginqlo and multi -family strud tes, resdentiel
master Edens,
Plans F ml-ner, Various CA Building DepaKMOMS
Enforced epplicawe State, and l 4struclmn regut ations for
msidanftl and commercial, man ted housing. and accessory
Structure-&
Plan Review
pefform, s commerdal plan mview for the follovVing projects:
HoWay Inn Expmzs, El Damdo Hills, CA
i{ovar Karate 19tudio, Plater County, CA
Mercedes Benz, El Dorado Wits, CA
`%rt Center EasL El Doyado Hill, CA
Marcy Housing project., 6' Dorado Mills, CA
El 'Dorado Hills Auto Labe & Car Wash
Residential Plan Review:
Firs, Lft and Salty & Structurak El Dorado, Placer,
=ramento County and City of SactemefflM
l
_ Momorwar
Fd Wilh ��eF��raoe
fi: _ l��
cortiffcaonst Utertse:
Paul Klein, CASp I Building Plans Examiner, C
ICC Gerfif*d SuWing 011dal
ftul h, -r, 20+ years of construction experience in ft buddl r,,g Plan,
#0873983 -CS
review arod InspecWn disdphnes. inieuding providing services for
numerous Tnuffi-mr1flon dollar pr�eots, He POSSe"es COMPtehm-TaivO
13SA Certifted AMOS$ Spo:ad iea
knowWge of the CWWornia Building, PliumVing, Mechanical. Electrical;
CASp#69
F-nwgy Standards. and AzicmlbilAy codes, as well as b6ng versed
md plans F:xa,-n1neF
rstruefto of tecWca$ *odes, Va.
in "ming;education and ff
managemert. pTuied =uTd�nation. pwiect deadrines. independent
judgment, do -sign pmbtms and solutions, document preparation
tCC Cet%ed suwing irtzpeaw
and Top wt wftng. Pail has obtained multipleCertHitmbons and
#873083-10
as awsmWed ap-mv i a rappo-ft with many Industry professwals
in nd bfl
, dLtding onginoers, architects, elected affidea, a 01he Pu 0,
ICG Cerifod Nfechanlca� bnspeclw
#87398-40
setect Project Experience.
Chief Building Metal, Yuba CRY
i0C C-e.raged Combinatkm Inspetwr
Managgs the day to d -ay operabws of The bulkiing division within
#7:,353
1hp Commun1W Development DeparMmnt Re"nsilaftes Indude
5
appl�wtons of the Cily BuJ ding and SYmty CWes 8-6 W911 as the
calUbmin Building Standards C0410S. Peftmm stOff evalualic
staff. ".Pning, diviplinary actions, and establishes division goals
1APM0 Plumbing,'r i fjr
arA octivw- Duties indole P,ePWM9 CIV CDuncii " reports,
#96358
ordinance aniendments, and budget reaquests.
PrafasslortW Affifttla":
Assistant Building Official, 8eats County
President SVA80
AsW in, thie Man -age ment of the Building Divisiwn, which included
it
Instnkaor,Arw;-:�= In-wule Of
a staff W, 22-4rispectors, para check "., a Mart circ engineer,
$a nforoanmnl offi, cers, PeOOMWd StOff
persist teahnida" and ow o
L 2009�2010
staff trairtireg, dlSdpIjnaty;pcbans and estabrighed division
evatuatiom,
plans Exgmitw lot CALBO for
goals and t ectives-
Annual EducaWo WOK 2001-2006
Assi-stant Ch W Building officlai, Yuba County
marymale Piaanfnq C*rnmlaslan
RespeasiWe for the inspection, plan rM, a -n -d pannl techntdan
staff, Assisted in staff evaluations, staff traln4g, and tRUblishing
division goals and ot�601ves- Assisted the pre paratlOff Of BOOM
of Superosoes staff WoM. mdinianaa, amendments, and budget
requests- Responsible fo-T the Building Division in the GNaf Suming
� for the entlre Community
officWS absence. offal ombudsman
D9vQr1opment Dopa. -fent. Imommonled and managed the automated
permifting system.
Plans eycaffllae'T 11, city of Roseville
pedonned plan review ibr all " ol aftuctums rangin frorn industrial
and co rmnerciW tO reSid0nV81, Managed consultants for 80 MaS110T
plan apd proJ4,cfion housing deVeI0PMWtS as W011 as a laFge WOA
load of tenant improvemerds-
Moye Forward Wilh COftfi&=
-JACJ
Cartificationsl L€ -coarse:
Bradley Waldrop, PE I Project Manager I Structures
Representative
als'C'E.
Regislemd U0 Engineer - CA
Brad'�ey has more than 22 fears of clad eMire ew-ing expermneo
459,124
spaciaFz' ing in puWic works design, Dwsportation plan n' .ng and design,
and s1rwAuW 4asiqn. He is cutmngy ft DirectoT of Operations to
the Public Works Serwues group WAhin Bureau Varitas, Srlays
Affiustions:
underst"iN of ft big picture and Ow impodance of being the
trusted adv4w to his dWts has helped him to build a succewful
American PuWc ftr,0, Assm'slwn
prdeopal pracfte. His projects have ranged from bf4ge design to
(APWA)
full service public- works enter Mses- Bradley's responsibiftie.5 have
indudW m9lonal management, off' managemerrL design group
American Society of QvI Engi
i""e0r�
loadarsWp, marketing, multi-dis*p6ne prof ed
(A$CfF)
construction managenmnt. mail design and Bina n, Wmictuml
�'nternat� M"V Code Coune, (ICC)
design, land dwmlopment, staff training I Is
.0 and design ovemight Hle has
bwn Involved In ft design of prp*?m w4h a comWmW constmcfion
Amelicgn tftst'date of Steel
value efraore ftn 1 bRlion.
CortsUucition (XSC)
Select Project Experience -
Rancho 9l ion Viola InfraistruaWre Plan Review, County of
Orange, CA. Principal-in-Chatgo for plmn check roview of various
infrastrucwm pn)A�cts assodiated wifn Planning Area 1 and backbone
infrastrueture of the Ranch Plan (hwfuding roadway design-epods and
plans, drainage studies, br4ge deign reports, rough grading plans,
geott*hftal report, and riverine reports) -
Engineering Plan Review, San BaTmartlino ASS-001at0d
Govemments; Cftfos of San Semardino, Placonfin, Rancho
Santa marsair ft, and Vance; County of Orange, C& Pripcipal-
In-chafge for review of grading plans, ImprMment plans, sewer
and water studhm, hydWzgy1hydrauUc slwd4% aO bond esti-rnatws
on an as -needed basis. Mans range, From minor to major reaidvn0a,a
subdivisions and coo merdaftdu&W, sifts.
The crossfn9s, ftlorville, CA. Project kfamgLr, I& the civi;,
sm, atura-1, and map r-Wew of improvement ptans for a 1,0M=e
mixed-use devel.-opment as well as tyre preparation of a regionat Master
Arlan of drainage for a 5, 1 00 -acre area.
Nortbwest Embankment Slide N11figation, Dry Crook Rancharia
Sand of Pomo Indiana, Healdsburg, CA, Plan Reviewer to provide
stAtclui-al plan review of tlebac� Ovalis for a dupe stabilization pmjecu
Slurry Seal and Pavement Rehabilitaton/CfPProjects, City
of Laguna Miffs, CA. Principal for the inspeOion of pavenwr.t
rehabilitation mrd read widening projects as palt of a Capital
lmprovemen% project, Tim included El Toro Read Mderifta 13,5
million widening from Paseo de Val ncia to and Moulton Parkway
Rehatiflas itation, as well park rehablibbon projects.
oa-Move Pa-watd k&ft Confidwice
—ISO—
C,ertfficatiansl Lfi=nao' Tina York, PE I Civil Pian Review
B.S.. 016r 1:ER915.lewing Irma inas 1 + years of expeCience focusing on :dvil tslaan review,
pfojer,t management, and civil rtginee-Ang, laving overseen plan
i 'tom Civil Engineer, CA., r�vi ', ftp 16+ agent s, she has customized mized :plan r r'
#48367rte and tacking logs, cbecktists, iand bilary worksheets for
tri .karg in"d ► costs. 11na l 8.160managed ani a %web -based plan
reviews try ing sys ;rn to gg vo agency staff 2417 pr*jW sWIus and
im&men.t d ekKAmnlc pian raVwwing to enhance 'imuoi bon,
reduce review ti-mes, and save money..
;elect Project Fixperlence,
As -Needed plan Check services for Pete Development
projects, County of ftnparjal Project ManagerICIVII Maar Review
Tachtnir,alart for review of grad�nq ptans, impametmm plans,
sewer a titan sties, hydrol oihydraul stu&es, and bond
estimaab3s on a r as4wed basis. plans range frm minor to maa�or
residenfial sutad is ns and commerclaYindustflal site racks
projeoM from first submMal to agent a=eptanco Vo weed
system o*,Id use ai-ctr iic plant rev inn,
Engineering Man Review, CItY of Ontario Project Manager for
review of grading plarts, arriprovernertt plans, hydrel /hydrauric
studies, sewer a4ld wst3r sttdi „ - nMps and F WOMPS, W4 tzcrid
waits an an eat -ceded iasis. Plans range from minor to major
msidenfial sutadi zns and mm rcia'i ftmtfrial sibs- Se-rvices have
also inn, uded tracking projects from first subrWittal to City a=ptaance
via aged ayWarn as well as elOWONO PiOn TsviuWng, M8n;0q,2d
the reviiaw of M plant ch ismr 85 Betel Wia ire three weeks,
review of design a"i :el 'llv all backbone Streeu viiftn Ni
Model Colony East (` 65% of U�Mi ), and r riewa of 66% ern
$ubmftl for 6 Of 12 rnsjor backbone
Engineering Plan Review, Cts of 85138rU, L3kQ ElslncrD,
urritta, W stun Viefc, tndlo, CatWral CRY, corr+did'O,
Carlsbad, d, San Marms, ioceanstde, j Counties of Riverside;
inland finpire Energy meter, and Otay W2t&r District Ptah
RaviewedPMieO Managerftnolpal-In-Cherse err review of grading
ialsms, improvement pla ps, sir and water stu. dies, hydrology)
hydraulic studs, and bwd estimates on an ded basis, Plans
range from minor r tea major residential subdivisions and wrnmerciaY
�rdustriat sem. Tmeks prcA� cts IT= firms submittal W 39000y
acmpt9neo via web -based .rystam and uses electronic, plan a evicwmg
HEMIR
(�,
Rrcfewianial Engiriaer
Wharf PE has over 25 years of profe"ional engincerLig
californi% X& 2DW
experkmce- He has technical expertise in commem,101 land
pffilmitmal Fngineet
devetopment, municipal capiMhMprovernent projects. municipalV
Vasbint*4% N-0- 21342
mview and staff servon, and marine engineenng and wateffrent
devefopment
ft*-'slomd emin"t
Hawaii, No, 7194
detect Pr,0100t EXPOVien=-
Building Permit I Improvement Plan Revtaw Servicas
Profewlanal Affilialms
Provides civil review samims for bath Pubfic Works and Building
pe-tmft Jbr WNsdictlons 59hmughout Califomia. Sorvices include review
Amrican Public Woft Aswdabw
for ,,,r* '
rpt to the California StOding Code, NPOES Permit
Clean Water Act requiraments, and l wquire metft and standaMs.
C,alilorrsla Land Sunmy&s
Asticclation
city surveyor I Map Review Services
Revism subdivision maps for with the California
Subdivision Map Art, Land Surveyors Act, and kv,,,,W ordinate
throughoO Carfornia. Serves as City SUrVOYOf for NO CaVOTWIS
JuNsdidons,
Bellevue Ranch Deve4opment - Me=d, CA
Provided developff iont revimw servims to the City of Merced 1br this
1365 acre mixed use prqJW- 'fin com—plete, BeKevue Ramh w0l
consist of 35 major bdivisions wM, over 3,000 residerroes,
mission Bay Development - San Francisco, CA
Prepared the rnasler grading and star drainage plans for this $34
bt-Won, 216 acre dovelopment In San Fr2ricism At ft requmt of tho
City of San Fwciscoa Mr. Middleton reviews all deveApr ent plan
submittals write n the Mission Bay projW ama for cWfOMIarice with VIM
me pian.
GenoVcs and Plant Biology Complex - UC Barke-ley
As consuftnt W HOK Ardbitedure, proves comprebsrsyve
infrastructure design serviws for this $85 intirmn addition to ft
UC Be*eley campus. Of parbr-War impoftrice was the routing of a
camplex any of piped and wired utilitleg WWO, cGnsMicted a=s by
use of Wity tunnels.
Iron Home Bridge - Vftllnut Cmek CA
Managed the design of this steel archzd pedestrian bTWp swing
120 feet very Btvd. Provided vatue engin ring services
hth: teduced the capital mst of the, bodge over $300,000, to maintain
Rhe prOact budget of $1,t Mild 0n,
Move dor rd wilh ConfiderM
� 2--
ti City of Costa Mesa
Building and Fim.Plan Ch"U and Inspection
Staffing
Zca lansi Ucvnza: Paul Hardy, PE Civil Plan Revfo
Paul has otter• 25 years, of rval enginsering experier^ce enC*rapassirig
Rstared CMI Es it r: plea dumking, Infrastmature and roadway darn, public wwoAs
CaFffb ria, #22M adminis"tip, municipal p-rc�acl: rnanagernerA and canstruction
management. e has vxeKed as city e in r fcar a number sNo- 51120 r of eXa
�l� d kris r it r, -�, is the Son Frangsco gay A.°ea and is fafttar with the issu-as involved
with pfar ning and implemanting :r Blur infrastructure irrproveartertts.
trt addition, to mar► ipafa�re�ts, l��cal S the Prtjt
Manager and Principal -in -Charge of a number of malor residen al
sub&ws on pace comprising mom than 3,000 units_ He hrae
perfbmmd plan reviews W resWanW and comrrAr6al developmwts
for thin Cities of Son Francism, Dublin, C r' lle, Orinda, Concord,.
Faire Lm in, Citrus Heights, and San Pates.
select Project Experience:
Sayview Roadway Recor on — Phase % CRY Of 82n PabfO
Project Manager fw rcadway irnprovement projett that WdUded thO
removal and replacement of asphalt c ncmle Pavement feat 2+ M418s
of city streets. Roadway drai�°ia e s; impmved v4ith the removal
and replacement ement o€ curb and gutter and non-cacrrapHant Curb ramps
and stdewvatk vete replaced. Storm drain inlets and pig, signing
and,ot6ping, and installation of a f f v, oir -e and K -rail were also
fncorpomted.
Concord Streetscgpe probe. ,pity of Concord, CA.
Project tVinesr for the design and prepar-alion of cons* cion
contract documents for the irtrprowe"ret of 1. 100 feet Of madwaY to
include boM hardy pe and landsmPa'mprovetnenls as an entryway
enhancerner,t P j0Ct 00 W41 pass Rraad.
"aart of olinda Sitractscaps Project, f Odnda, Cad..
pl-0100 Engineer for e n and tl~m development Of the
con*uctlon contract cl=,rments fbr this high pWl a street
improvement proled. The p it Omits included Me business disWrctaf
the City. Servims also indw$ +41 construction SuPpo t.
Sit edels Stm. 01ght Replacement PtOJOCt City of W01 Valley
Senior Enginew for the Plans and sPBcific2U0nS to irate ll
decorativestreeffIghts In M41 `laatley as part of a RVe 20A utif fy
underground project- Assisted the City wdh Rule 20A coardinabW with
F�G&E dudn the des n phase -
r Drainage Pian) for Mission lays City of San Fra WSCO, CA,
praiect Engineer fon°re pl�rrnft .and master plan drainage design of
ft Mission iaay area far? the S. 10, 25 arrd 100 yea?- design -storms.
This Edo, area was subject to wTm set6ement that affected the
ver iocrs drainage basins.
ti
°LM _
City of Costa Mesa
Building and Fire Plan Check and Inspection
Cer0cationsi a Jensen, PE, CBO I Fire Plan Review Engineer
Pres mortal Engiftw, Fite
Steve has 26 years of experience -wotWng in the buiddfrog Industry.
Prolectlon, # FP 1561 -
The Majority of Steves exp ence is as a BUM-ing Official in several
State of carffomia
locabons in Calffarnim- He has extensive knoMedge, of the 03fifornia
Reg,910red Proferral Er 1MW,ff
BuMing CodeS WW the 10' ' UI Ing 0�-
Fire ProMebon, Umnse # W16 -
&ataof Mzoma
'01 Oct PrOJec' E-Ver'&nce:
Chlef Suilding Official
CALSO CoMfied HuRdIng C"Fidal
Bureau Verltas for America, City of Sacramento, CA
Pjvw Rock Casino
CC & IC80 Plarrs Examner
Chief SuMing Offir;al for Dry Creek Rarcheria, Band of PurrO Indiams,
Slaphen pmvides C80 servers for tt*elr existing facflity and future
casino and hotel exp neon,
tcc & is Pwrntrng in .fir Chief Building Official
ICC & [C1f a i l Inspector City of Napa
She managed the Striding Irmpedion and Code Enforca=nl
JCC,& X80 Refuldcal ln5ppctor Uwisions of the Community DavaWqrnent Dapanment Responsible
for the adftnistratkm of sH City fttvifin muted to satting and
ICC & IGBOComb�nabs on InspeoWr ensuring comp Wnoe with model code slandwds including pan checK
inspaction and zoning matters. Designated building official for the
ICC: Cemiled BuMil Cq_ i aroped and prov€dsd cornprohensive training pro9mms for
lAPM0 Me4hanical Irmpeotor division sW, lff- Eve3usted and approved allarnMe methods and M. aletials
for construction, Promoted the use of erwrgy of tient co on
including green buft-ing, solar and photovottaic energy conservaticm
motheds. Encourage and enfDres disability accan'Mwain puWlc
buildlnp and mutbiarnfly housing. SupeMsed a staff of 10 peMns.
Chief Building Official
County of Marin
Steve administrated a comprehensive building Inspection progrm-n
mAthin the unincorporated auras of the County of Marin. Senmd as
the he of the Building and Safety 9M rftn the CommunKy
Dwaiopmertt Agency. ResponsiWle for b0ding permits, inspecUons
a ad fire provenfion induding the MuildiN Appea% Board arW buildng
code e0orcenvM. Planned, directed, supemised and coordineWd
Um County's building iqspection and housing enforcement programs.
Prav4ed policy guidance and dinxAion I -a the implementation aDd
force ant of applimable laws and a-dinarsces for a uniform builAing
inspecbon progmm which considers cammuff?.y needs and changing
construction Indusuy nuawteria&s, pmralcea 9" safety pro cedures-
Prom,oted the use of altemative buRding matorWs iaid methods
ineguding green building pmetices, energy conseNation and fire safety.
Supervised a staff of 15 penis -
Move Fwfwafd Imth CmAdepw
CerfficaUtwsl License: Anne Maria Bland I Fire Ptah Reviewer
ffied fare Code lir Anne Marie is a Cortifted Fife Code IrmgaMr and P06,003scs 25 years
& combined inspection and plan review experience municipal
Fire Nevention Officat 1 ',9771364 agenrAaa as vmll as pato businasws. She has inspected numerous
Fife Pwiiwht% Officer Il - #87 0052 iki f ' rr darst c rrl r iai high f i 3, hospUls, re&i W.
and education l steams for assembly and hazanfous aster 918
Fee prevsnjion ,wr Ill to deWrmina cornplianw mffth ft uniform and Califomia Fire and
Building Codes as well as mer p rUnent code$ and OrdinarxeS.,
Rie Irtve", aGcn IA Anne Mpirie has also reviewed Wans for new ConstaucNord and tenant
impr emits to ensure proper fife pratWion sysWirn i nstallaition
Haza-J= Matte T eal e, - and code co pliarw. Anna Malie has also superwsed and trained
026° inspedors to ocmduct routine inspeCli nS.
PC 832 and Armst elect Project Experience:
Procedures Flre PtanS EXMInOr
Cities of Hem, et, MurillaU, and Orange, C
Anne prov"adad mview of pi - s for coffipliapxe With UnifGff n Firm Code
requirements inclu in s-mrt rc l gnd res4at` l #gra spring and
fire alarm systems.
Fisc plans Exam Inez
City sof Huntingwn Beach, CA
Aftnia provided as -needed Unworm Building Cade plan mview rv? S
including detai d plan chac* 01 fire ar'fd tib safety requirernents. and
fire sp6nkler and alarm systems.
Fire pverrfion macer
Ca:ebad Firer Dopertment Com.
Anne purr Cha ed nOW a.� ening taaaiif@ings and �ire praten
systems. ms. Fie ld inspa ions -of all types of =upan6es and firm
prae�flor swems_
r-lran safety spiallt
City f Orange and city of Santa Ana Fire ttepaMneCA
Anne inspscW all G=panCy types tn,--Iuffing high IIAOS. h pdals-
iis, ra sWenfial, residential care, educaWnat, WAgnibly and
hazardous for the pufpose Gf deteanining coa l with Via Uniform
and Calif m4 Fim and auilding Com, and OthOT Wfinent awes and
ordinances, Reviewed plans for fire protecvon stem.'rnstaslaftA and
now cDnstruction, Inspect &0 pmlecftn SWOMS, wOmsstests ;issue
arrectiml notices and vi ali€ ns. Assisted and laird fire su-ppresSIOP
personnal ire oordurAiqg roullne l p lio-ns_ Assi Ad on soamon fife
invesfigaVons.
move Forward vyi% Con5denre
Cartifloaffanst incense_ David Omv-ey I Fire Plan CheckerfinspeeWr
GSF rte= David pmvides building, f reilife safety plan m , consufting swvices,
Chief Officer and concoptual design envier asWfatance far new and exisfing
Vire Fighter VE", fac.11-ities, He is currently ft lead fire plan revie. war W, the City W West
l=ien EnverjUgalor VV Sacramento and also serves as Fire Marshal, for ft River Rock Casino
Rse Pro*uUon SPedalw; project He also provided fireAft safety rev1s for tbe $1.8 bfikon
Ha7mat first RespoAdW &
- Mor an Y. Mineta San Jose 1pternational airport expansion prqject,
wa W
'Tech Spm,
P�ap,z Fxarn2ner
Pubft E&,wfior- C-flicer Select PrOlOct F-xWience:
NAFI Cerffied-
Lead Fire Plan Reviewer, City of West Sacramento, CA
FiralExpfw#ons it vea4alor
Cis ffentlyperfornts fire plan re*em for the City of Wast Swa=nto,
CA -Reviews indude buiWings of multiple =Upwlcy types. IM-Oluding
Praf�ssttnal Affiliations,
targe Industrial fadrdies, Wghrte bull4ings, and off e and retail
Nauartat Fite Protection dation
structures,
€niarnalmnot Fire Marsihals
Asw*a*m
Ft m Mamhal, River Rock Casino
,ICC)
jjr"eir tjg 0)00 CWncgq�
d It Itaratiors, an
pe.rformad fire and We safety raw of all a d ons, a � , d
OffirA of the Sisw Fire moartai -
Improvements Wr ft River Rcck Casino In Gcysereit v, CA- The River
Fire E71hquwmT Adv� Sowd
RwA Casino as in ft, planning stages for ares Tuscan style vlftp
Member (2003)
which WI include a 260 mom high-rise "tel, meeting r{vms. pool and
Noyffiam Area Fim Prowuntion
spLa, restaurants, gardens. waterfalls, and luxury suites.
Offimllk,ction, CoAtomka Chie%-'
Aawmagon
FirelUfs Saftq Plans Examiner. Lswmnee Berkeley National
San Mateo County Fim Prevention
LaWratory
OffimrW Ou Cn iVW
San M 'nty pig
e
Performed plan revip-w for muMple expansions and upgrades to tihe
past pw
'Iden,
Lawfance Berkeley Nafional Laboratory. Duties indudied park'Uming
Say Area PtapW Trarmit Dititme-I Fi-,V
COMp fire and fife safety inspections. canstrun and fire protection
LWv,to.-I C-qmrr;4jee
pin review, and advisory duUes. Oevalqped and conducted fire
C4ilffornla C"m3saf Argon
and I& safety edur,2Von and amraneas programs F-cT labora"
lnvea%ators
employees and fire dePaMrAnt pemnrmL DaveloPed, Supervised,
and maintairuW the la r ry Vegetafion Management Man,
Raley Field, City of West Sacramento, CA
md as the plans examiner for the 3,500 person, stadium oornplOted
in 2WO. Home to the Oakiand APWaties Triple A basebalt team the
venue is also uNized as an open-air entenainment faci.Ily and Irdudes
a stne, backstage WfWws, luxury suites, box seats, rOM, i0fl
stands, and restroorns.
Muve FoTwaTd with Confidence
Corwicaonal ucame: Elaine Clark I Fire Plan Checkerfinspection
BS, Fire Pfw�n Engineenng Elairm has over 20 y6ars of expefienm in fre Protection sewic"i
UffiveTsity of Maryland She has s*Tv4DO, as a ff.re cade specialist mspDn9ib?-e tor providing
Fire F'ro!aaan. Carrf=to.. University On review and 1nspWi*n, and for dcvetpinq =tMiZed sOluticrns
Of CWMIft'a. Davis on fire rotated challenges for a variety of commercial, industrial. and
maiden'tial Propedies-
$elect Project Experience:
Naj�arr,31 Fife Pratectup hwwlaton. Fife Coft Plans Examiner and Inspector, City of West
Nodhem California Sacramento, CA
Re-sporLsible for providing plan teview and ipsp"Von on vianous
commercial and Industrigi pm*cts such as an I KEA st", a 130.000+
square foot retail WWW desig-nedwitt' unqw exifing requirements
and strict Fumpean guklelrays that de not aWays match UCB-O
requiremnts.
Fim CQ dq jnspezt*--r. Genentech SloWch Facility, City of V-1c8ville
Fire code jrr:sp ctor rgspons&e for performing plan mview and
Inspect*
ns on 6 of 10 new bu-Mings for compkance with local and
state fire codes FIOT this pharmaceutical manufacturi, researche and
devetopment facilkli. Soo" in tided fire alarm, fire sprinkler, FM200
sVstam, and undergmunal sand-PlPe S"Stem.
Fire prevention Officer, Carlsbad Fire Deparbnent Carlsbad, CA
Plan checked new and existing buWings and fire protechon systernS.
re protection
Field Jnr-pectio is of All types of occupancies and f
systems.
Fire Inspecta"T, Cache Creek Gln* and Resort RuMSOY Tdbal
Game Agency, CA
Provided inspections on the Va"us pratec` n systems (fire BW'01,
rul starns, fie spdAkWM2000 , Fsystam, kitcher, &0 suppmssmn
ays
system) L --T thI;s project that consisted of a
yet s, and dry sandpipe
casino and a "-twy hotel. Due to Ow fast track natum of this p
fire pmteclion systems were instaRed almost as fast 85 PlOns Wem
bejftq developed, resuly',ng [p. numeTws Field chianges to the 5y:StOMS
be
throughout the plan approval proons. These chan "d to made
fM fife safs�j mW,.tkements-
whijar—naintwnha at Wast mlMmum fire and g
Fire ProrteoVon Engineer, CRY 01 West Sacmmento, CA
ResponsVe for pmvidtrqj plan reVgew of arc wj,� tal and er�glne
ng NFPA, UFC, and
plans for compliance fDr fire prDteKAjo-n V 040s usi,
uBO standards, Served as a fl&wn between the Fite and 131jilding
Doper' Ments- Maintained teal assistance mete an plan Wow
and fie M I.nspectl r various City proininthe ARCO
Arena, where fim sprinkler expeniSO w8s provided
at re Fcrward-w-ar, Confidence
(' O�i I-
HOM — I � 9
Cartlfloa-"nW 1,,'zenso: Daniel Feeney I Inspector
Budding lr4pWor OM0338-10 Daniel has oxtensive knowledge and experience as a Buildan-q
BuRd,ng Inspeclor UMC #522n3B- fnspector ard SuRding Plans Examiner, 4e has been Mspeclirg
struclums; undo¢ construction, walusling building, cloctrical,
machania and plumVing systems for comphance with app5cable
codos. His vast kmNMdge of ft operations of a BuiWing DepaOinent
has allowed hi m. to manap inspection and document cant. staff_
Plus>M InspecW UPC, #52203.38- SeWct Project Experience'
34
Burkling Mrs Exernim #5220338- Inspector, City of Costa Mesa, CA
60 Daniel provided Inspection seir4m for the pity of Costa Mesa,
lnspectiom int ed reside ntialnew constmOon, r"Wential additions,
cornmemial new construction, and wane r6al T I ptoi
Buildin Plans Exam.Jrter, 96220338- jacts.
K6, UMC Inspector, City of La ftenW, CA
BuDding Rarm Examimff CBC, NovidW msWeridal and commercial inspeons throughout the
#oo1o492-83 City. Pruvided building, m=haniaW. Oafting, alect6ca1, fire, and
accessibft inspections to resWerffiai and rammer cial Wldmgs, and
PC- 832 - Anvst and Cant d *wamd the permit Wunter wtwn rmaded-
Supe rvtsing Mspimtor, City of Palrndal% CA
Provided building, mechanfeal. plum-bing, e%.ctn-ca% firs, &11d
scoessib-ility inwoWons to misidential; and wmmercW h-Odings.
Managed six budding departinent ernplbyee$, andoovw, ad Lite permit
counter when needed.
Inspector. City of Ranafto Mirage, CA
Provided residetfJal and commercial inpwtons throughout ft
Co. Prov4ad bultding. mechand cal� plumbing, alectriw], Ire, and
accessi1affity inspaftns to resideribs tArad Wrnmerdal buildings, and
coveTed the penrR counter when needed -
Move Fuvmd with C�onfidence
IWACBO Cenified Combination
Inspector (A*'31a3O3"0)
It Hour OSHA 5 -or C-4neral Wustry
Q iiow HAMOPER (Hwardous
W=0 COOMIleff. & Ernarwcy
Rezpeftae) as &robed by 29
Professional Affittaffians;
Crean Bu ng Trair>;ng Program
Goei�n
Mtk-- 24 Oafifofrr O EMOW VA00"O
Slandamis
BuNding Performm' M
Hoene Energy Rater
Bufting Analyst Profes,,03na.'
Envelope Profewianai
WateriEnergy Audltw
Jerry ks a Joumeyman electrician wO over 20 yew -sof experience an
various di lir of building mainlona nce. andconst= Vion, He has
worked in both now constnwSon and electrical maintenance of power
reflnery plants. Ks new cortstuction expeftrice indudes mnstTuction
of otecAricWt s in commercial and inidustdal buildmos, and
resklengal propenies, He has peftnr-.ed servIce panel Irmlallations as
waV as instaration of brand circufts, feadaf, and top ci=fts. He has
,Iso inamiled macbinery, mcwvaya, Ng frog, and ouWts,
As a plant a field engineer in the energy i.--ndU5tTYJerrY MOint8irA)d
and upgraded 9**ical molars and svAtchgear in power plants and
refinelies, This woTk included cornV�ete change out of elecWcal
sysWrns during routine shutdowwts. Jerry WOO has experiff= With
oDmtructW of mate fiauwrk and foundalions, roofing InsW196ons,
and general construthon wo&
Select Project Experience:
Inspeotor of Reoord for the City of San 01800
2010-20111
Inspector of Record one Covernment proms MT a Ped floe WalkwaY
that was rept rig ft Walkway over Vie 1-5 freeway at the border
from Mexico to ft USA. Inspected the installation of light P$Os, ramP
lights. panals and underground Fa, fines f6r EkKAdC81 MW hosPected
irrigation lines, water lines and drinking founWns for MmWng all unftf
ADA=mPfiance-
A=Vdi.
,Ed Creen qtjMbeT Inspector of 'Record for Camp Pendleton
2009-2010
4 bed at
an pealof Record for a pfo�W at Camp Pendleton vat
$1.6 mMion USD and Oonsl$W of a complale mniod-allfrom a
commercial stucture into a Coces mswurafvt, pr*ct induded a
kitchen, ffm=nirm, dining rom, patio, and resbWnis all under ADA
comAlla nce,'iru,j,ding paths of travel. ResponaiVe for inspect -W,01
bu-ilding, 6lect6ca1, meOanical, and Wurnbirwj,
Inspector of Re0ord for CftY of HaWsOmn Gardens, CA
2007 —2008
1nspsctor of R=rd for Bureau Vefitas or AmBdCa tract w0drang FM'
the Los Angeles County Ubraxy and Public Safety Center for the City of
Hawaii2n GoTdons, Project valued at $2,6 million USD and consIsW4
01 the o=,plate rernodel of a commercial strucWre �.nlG a two-s"�
bufld-ing consisting of a tibrary on the first ROOF: WO d2r-smGms,
Mfifrsofff re. children's nurwry, Mth- a Mchen and other offices 011
the sownd floor. Responsible for inspecfion of aliactrical. rani 1,
plumbing, and ADA oamptiance, ftla4ng p9ft of tmvei. Also
inspected tandscap-Ing, concreta, asph=alt att work. aparMA9 Wills,j Ot, Move Forward wilh Qanfittsrw
Cer0fir-affoml Uj:oft"'
Scott Humphrey I Inspoetar
JAE1 Wastv Eledft:M �WOCW
CEI-M-165(FxplO-31.44 )
Scot has 25 yea Ts of work exWianze as a licensed jowneyman
Icc (W;bw Combina"In Inopw4v
�
5254$$4,-C,O tExp.r s-10-14)
.and has on residential, commemial and irdustAal
aftlTicianaas wwk
,cc rimed cwmmruw combinstm
sitDs, He has extensW ex ren working with Tanswable emergy
Inspe=
projetts and generating stations, and speciaFzes in code compliant
52; 6,64,0,5 (Exp.8-1a-14)
9WW=� instGita Wns. Sc M is currently wGritmQ on the laTgest Photo
ICC ce9tr4d Buadlnq Inspedw
Voltaic pMect W North Ame6ca - SolwOne PV pMed kwated m
,cc C Cvmm4al SLIWin;
Southem CaMOMRS.
ImpWor
525466402
Segact Projeot Expaejanca*
jCC CartiedInsPWW
52546$4-" (W.84:144 )
%h" Examw
p,
F laid Label Evaluator, Cornma-Tclal & FJ8--trical
62U664 -E3 (Exp,,6-10-14)
pgrfwmed InStWistion modffication, inspaa,-ons to UL Seely
MG Cartffled Gwwr*MW Elftdftw
standards, Pe on Instaliation inspect -ions to NFPA 70- Fero ed
"'*4POm'
prelminary design rawew of Wd mo ed equipment, Issued repOft
. (Exp,840A4)
5.254004we-2
�zs an o1ETLf1eP
of OGnprana_ and noTmmpj�ance &Oho -rized u ce W
'Dr
"cm, 9pee
ted Me&wr
CoAff
52&*& -m5 �,Exp.e-io-14)
taWs confirming compliance if,.- UL safety standards- PraWded NEC
ICC CArtftd Gomiftroa WWWO'Cal
education on pV sy-sWms to authorifties having jurisdjcdon and LAE41
11"WIV
ICC rnembtts.
525404,M2 JlExp-B-IOA4)
M Cenifta Plumbing Irapwar
5254W4-Ffi (Exp.B-�]D-14�
Field Operadons Manager
tCC �Fcommwcal plumbhiq
en raj Elett riz Renewable Energy
ft"dcl
Pe,,foqrwdr'm,4a.I1iation Inspections to validate GE qua Ry sts n -dards,
which it tided metal dad switchgear and 1,5 MVV converters.
M Coft4jed Ret4d"Jal CombhKp"
Mgnaqw Instaftfion pTocass fee Z&ear atectft SYStOms In US,
2nspe=
SHAW4-ft (Exp.8-10-14)
Europe and Ava, Provided InsWallan 9(W leChniCal inStructiOns to
ICC Ce%fped Res,,donlid! Eledhice,
installers to ensure proper instakedlons. Served as point of cmntaCl
I
for techftal questions, D"gned AutoCAD dravvings, prepared sfte
$2S4$S4-�r,,j (EXp.$10-14)
plans and layouts for solar ethic instaVations- TroubllwW systems
ResidentW BaAft
jnwe,mv
and assisted installers in identifying and covaong instafttlonissu -as,
52MW4-13", (EXPA-�o 14)
Developed and conducted training.
10C Caffied ResdW110 PtUft"
kOPWAV,
Combination Inspector If
.$25-4$$4-Pj
'_U2, Mechar .4,,
fed Re$W4F
City of San Diego DeveloPmOnt WOOS
Inweaw
Lead Inepwar for ft City of San Diego photovollai.c. tnspentons.
6254&A -Mt (W.8-'10-14)
ResponsibOffies included training staff and othat, stakeholders m
CA Soiffe SWAM ln*ecW
photovoftaje inSpaCtlem. Performed ins work in aW fields
(Exp.4-21046)
of bAding IIs pet-ftm Inspected residentiaUstmetures. intruding:
Gw", joumeyman CA
107473 (ExpB-20421
muWftrmly housing units for=fbm=.OD with mumat bulkfing
E*cyWa?t jawmaym an 9- LO I WA
oxmvucton, zones and grading codes. Maintained records., prepared
HUMP MOMF (F -W2-70-131
-Te"rts and issued cArm&;on notims.
e=v=i contiiwng Ed tan
JnV,r',r.Wr Dept L&I
ab
Mbve Forward with Copfk1eme
M
city of Costa Mesa
wX Building and Fire Plan Check and Inspection
Staffing
......... ..
Certificattanst License,, Tim McMillan Inspector
Tim has mom Umn 10 years of extensive inspecfion expaAence with
nia. �iz has provided inspectio' n
MX GerIffied Bwi� , ins or Multiple lueAdidonS throughou,, CalifW
and c*de enfamenzent sen4ms to several 1-unsdictions throughout
ICC CeMied Combmation lnspe=r Califo-fts and is well versed ir, 004-0 rc-quirerents and customer
ICC fAa-dfmd OecftWi tnspwJor service -
IGC Ce.-thed Me&anlcal Inspectm Safest Project Experience:
Building Irmpector, CI tY Of K3P3
sin e ift faMity
-nmercial and, rmldeftftl I W and m
icc CarLmed Ptumbing irmpeaw Turn provdW cot
inspectiorm for the City of Napa for a-ppro)(imately 3 months whi;e
the City inspectaT was on leave. He provided wis for m:
SOMMS by iswing red togs for unpaTmitted work as wdl SS dW,"t)
fDL�ow-up jr,spetg �ions. Ke pmvided inspection service for a 330 mm
and conference center addWon to a hotel on ft outskirts of the UY
of Nops. In addifion, he inspected 2 dental off cas from foundation
pouring thmugh =action compleUon.
Building in -Spector, CRY of S=8MOntO
Tim performed Inspeotions an rental homes as a paA of the Rental
Inspeckjor. Housing Prograrn. Other tasks in -luded residential Mid
OommarciW bugd-ing, inspections, oode enforcement, and mousing aMd
dangwous buNding ins on. �M provided a damage assessmel-M
Of a l restaurant Mat had been severely damaged in a fire. Tm
guided Ihe client through the perfrit prowls, Code enfoxemOnl
proms, and finefly through the InspecAlans dwing construction to sep -MY
mopening. Ton aiso proVided case managwen-1; -vice 5 for 1118 C
wrnpWInts and tradking
Code Enfaxament team by responding to
these complaints frown the initial cornp'Bint through resdutio-n.
Ins r, City of Stockton, CA
Tim pravidod in ns for residential bufl&mgs, ensuring that
oonstnictionfatlawed atl adopted buildmq codes, submMals, and
approved plans- Some PTQjPcft indaded now constiuction, r�ntal
and ream
or projqds, I nspecWd:3 indmmndent housing twcts- ftOn
foundation to construction cop
inspector, Cky of Jackson, CA
Tirr, pFovwed inspeeons for residential and comMeMW PrOPWOOS.
jaSpeClbons inriuded mulfi-family honm, single famflY homes,
conn mercWl Tls, and ad-ditions. 'rim provided IMPO Vins of the
foundation through constru;ction complebon of an office Wilding for
00
the County of Amadon Dufkng his Urne in j=kscm, JIm inspWod I
msidenfial homes from foundation throuah Construction wrnpletbn,
inspector, City of Pleasant Hill, CA
ns to the City of
Tim provided residentWO and cornmercia'insPecfiO
Pleasant Hin, He ensured that construGfi*r,, adhered to all adopted
bultdinq cades� submittals and qppfm, d pons.
Move Forward wah ConWefw-P,
Cor0callon License:
Leon+Mehl I Senior Inspector
MC Ce6fwd Resideftiat
Leon has over 30 years €mf expertenm in the constrty4on €ndusty and
com&flawn Imipgaor
priming building inspection SaWiMS W MWOVIS rWr p8l as isnts
throughout C lii`ar mis, He has served as ChW Building Official for the
Pr,ft$-sianazl Affillatiom,
City ()f ValMo and as GhW Buildthg Inspederfar the CRy of Pleasant
€ sn iplumW @
Flilis and as an Lnspector on severalpr y in lifts ia_ HO his
extensive a key r ge of all assts of managing a building r e"t.
tCC ChairmanModer4tw F
f'ictt ding bul:dln'a inspectiansplan revoew, and code enforcement.
Evahaliw Comm m4pe 11998-" )
l ES Evaluation rt sit O
Select Project Experience:
Senior Inspector, Bureau Ver s, Gila of Cites Heights. CA
Provides inspection services for the `pity of CiUus Heights, CA
CA Loftry Building Senior or I r, SAO Of Wlfcmia
peftymsdins bong at the California L egit building in downtown
Sactarnento, s� stoPi , OMWS Of Mul- i OCCUP8M
J'�i'i�haie�q}b�vqugd��k��jis
t es, and Is a r0. 0, 61 square fe'et.
160,66
levo County GOVOmmOnt Cffntcr SeDIOT InsPOctOrt
County of Sclano, CA
Project consisted of a Six -story, goVefflMen,1. admloistmwn building, a
r�vr story paTking gars, a -story afte brtllding, and an eypans,;On
to an exist ng eledrical c a3 ration plant, There we four sepal
structures for this projed, as well as distribution piping arvJ Qlslr.W l
upgrades for the ogee Downtown Faiffield Govern, mont COM-PIOX.
Inspeved foundaUonstfooUngs, f mim Desi:, plumbing. and
mechanical. Reviewed all inspecUon reports and lob test mats for
pass or fail -
Travis Air force Bass nj*-r Inspector, Baffor Beatty
The Travis Air Forte lase military housing projW indWes a
Community Center,, tate construcWn of 147 single fam4y nws,
211 duple, and the ranovabon of 106 8xiO4a Mng faMily
midences, and daplexe& In 2009. the Trav5sXir Force Base ween the
Associaton,of Defense Comrr un ties, Private Swoff Pmject Award for
lft<is project
r ritech sjotcch Fsclllt es Supervising Insp ote:r, City of
VgcavJffip, CA
W&Ked unda r the direction of the Citj Gf Vaca d`cle 1305 dirqj Wiclal
insufts�g all State of c;alffornia Building Standards related to sfl tmdes:
Rived ir&spei:bn mquests at the site, documented the request and
results, and entered them. into ft City daUbase system,,
Cer0ficaftnal License:
?,CC Cerated Elum-Q Ozcw
1CC Cgrb W manankml Insw-clor
CIVIC
JCC Cerffmd Mechanical InspeoWr
10C, CeITpd PhimNing I n-NxTWr
UPC
IOC Cend Paimbing t
[CC OwtMed Building Plans
Exlffmw c8c
[CC ceflftd ROdIng tnspedw
ICC CarVWd MeChangOMI �M$Pe4�W,
, UNIC
'CC Cadfied MiNing fat is
Examiner
]CC Owtfied CanibLizzlon 9n.specto?
= cat'61fied Fjact6m; Inspeew
Cwhfhw SuAding Inspector CIRC
Profes5ional A01500Das:
�Smoxft va�jey xr,-,40wion &
Offi;§,a�s (SVAF-0)
BuV,d It Gnm Polr4 Rater 2007
International Asw=tion of Electrical
Insper.wrs
Rick Swenson, CBO I Senior Inspector
Rtk has over 22 years of bul-Wing inspection expeNence kir the Cities
of Roukrin and Rwevd%. Rick is also active with the 8=amento
Valley Associgon of Building Officials (SV80), W served as an
ExecutNe Sowd Member from 2008-2008, wgantmd no cost
inspector training, devetcped senijr inspactw meefings, and pmwed
ftwwPoint training pre "ntatio*s- Rirk was also a Board Member for
the international Asia of F-lettrical InspecWm (1AE1) W the
years whem he worked to orpnize the Calffornis electrl al 1 rMPOCtes
yowly meeting in Sacramnto-
Select Project Experience.
Senior inspector and Plans Examiner. Sur au Verfts,
Sacramenter, CA
Pe or residanftl and oommerdial inspections, as well as resZdenfial
and conmrdal plan reviews for the OftY Of West Sacrarnenjo, The
projects vaiTy In scope and size Vo m small maidentialk additions to muffi-
story cornmeTdal tenant hnpm.vet ents. Heps impresent ft build'Wog
depart"M by allerding 'PrwpO Rw Committed" meetings and
speaking with applicaons to h0p Oijam in tha pl2nninq, devsk)pment,
and plan sett mintal for Meir projects, I-waNW in updaVng various
building department fomtg and handouts to meet the cuirent adopted
code mquirements-
Impecuon Services nagar. City of ftooklin, CA
Duties as I nspecfion Servs - s Manager Rw ft. Cdy & Raddin included
supervising and aWsfing Insp=fion sftff, Worked with err chftects.
engineers, contractma and business OWTIOTS to fewlvO residential and
commercial construction Issues and proOftd overne w plan review.
Supeivised and assisted the Muncipal Ccda Enftzement NOW= -
Assisted Building Official With epi i81 Pf*ds, incJuding budget
preparatiort, Responsib% for Implementing ft ek,,VVOn!c at h1ving
precj, which indudcd plans, permft. and inSPediOn reowds,
Assisted v4th coilecting data and anaj'Os for buiWingpermit fee study
prCiect.
Senior Building Inspector, City of Rocklin, CA
Responsible for day-t"ay supervision of building irspectGrs,
;nspector training, and ovemll s.uppoft for the ink lon pMram,
anoluding �nspecbnq oom.p.Fex yesidentig. and c-om, morcial oonstructirt,
supervising and assisting in-Vectom, prmWing =rftat5on, plan
review amd W-stomer se at permit counter. and =rdinatng
gnspedor training and conducting In-house training.
6 "- -
, O-v���,) Mova Forward with Confidence
Or M— — 1(
03,
►C4 Of I!Zosta mesa
Building and Fire Plan Check and InspecHan
Staffini�
Mr- Gottschalk has over 25 years of experience if' 018 corstTuction,
[CC CertMed ft ng Flar* industry Working 86 or Insp9ctor end 9 co.rltra
�Ctor. His proles�'-onafisrn
Examiner and knowiedge in the current codes enab%s him to provide qLm14y
1014','Ceni�l,ed CA Bu ng ftns Inspectservices along vifth axcepWnal customer Service.
Erni wf Some exWgance Includes remodels, now "dential construction.
caTnmer6al *"nUmprovernents, and now mmmore al construction.
I -0C. t"ad CA C*Mb5nOOn
In$p-20w Select Project EXperienc-e-
Combination Inspector
ICC CartIffied CA C-ommer4al Bureau Verfts - City of Folsom, CA
Buiing 115PWtV As -a combination inspector for the pity of FOISM, pe eft On -ow, I
[CC Cadited CA Commemial inspeefien seNices f0Y both fesidePtial,, and OOMMeWal StructuTes.
Dutle-s alsolftAuded managing the permit and inspectors ice. and
aftntfing meetings Wfth owners, architeds,,anineem and cont rWors.
Oerff*d CA C'0ffMW-009
Mechanil Inspedar
ca
As a 0Drnbjn0tic;n inspertor for the, City of Folsom, petfonT*d on-call
mpaaon. naMces for both residential and ownmercial structums.
tCC Ceffmd cA ern arciai
Dufies. included communicating and meefin With
Plum.Ymg lnspe=
engineers and contracWm,
Conffiod CA Rosidental Bwldirtg
Combinaflon COMMOM181 frUsPOctOr
ITISPcIOr'
City of Jackson, CA
As a Ca-mbinabon terra merctal InsPWOf M the pity Of J8CkSOM
ZC Cerfffied CA Res,,denbal
peftffned cmbination comrnerdal jr)&petftns and tainting plan coda
EecWcal inspector
compganoe reviews. Job duties allso included managing permiland
gCC cegffeed CA Res�danftl
� SPOCIiDn OfflMs and attending mectiftgs with owners, arch-kWs.
M
Mechanical Inspector
engineers and contractors -
ICC CerVftd GA Re&denUl
pl.umbing InspWof
Cambinatlon Inspector
Combinad-on CommarrIal Inspector. Managed permit and insWtWn
afte, attended meetrqp Vdh awnefs, Wchitels, angineers, and
10C Cerfifted WiWkna 011691
contracWn, Perfoffned combination commercW inspectiO-M
Ice camw C-Ombnoon Inspsclot
Commar dal inspector, cny of Glendale, AZ
1,CC Car%ed Cmm-WhOW-n lrmpedor-
Commercial FWCwmi inspwaor for City of Gllenfte. AZ. Expa*=O
included wmmeal. lndushia, sch woAse and
rnurd_fsmily restdereal. pwftrynad building plea oode coMpRance
reviL- m-. Prw,',ects in-%pected include Ahmna Cardinsis. Stadium,
jn"=Wti aa 0oft CouncR
endala Oasis Water CSMPug, a $55,000,000 WatOr Ve2UMM WAY,
the VAstgate City Center, a 223 -acre Shopong, spris, conveation
center and fmtei compl0x, the John 0, Rammons Hotel, a 1"WY
high-rise, ft. Arrowhead Commurt-N, Hospital, the Benner Thunderbi-fd
Medical Center, the MidNestern UrI:Varsjaid ii Suild'.ng.
Glendale High SchW, a ca re pmjed wjo,� three cont'guo.is A-�3
,jpancies, a WW and convention center for a casft, and the Ffre
a=
and police Department Pubt-�'z Safety BuRding.
Move Rnnws-4d w1h Confiaenw
city Of Cos" mesa
Building and Fire Plan Check and Inspection
Staffing
Utense: Rick Trent Inspector
ICC Cetffied Building Inspector
Cer"60 Combirration lnspcwtor R�dk has 25+ years of consh-ucfion expenence with ave f IQ of these
years providing inspection seivices on both msidential and [Vhl
[CC Certified Fl Inspector cwmercW struttures to Butte County. He has peftmed Inspections
ildings, ensuring cm9fiance wfth
Gr raMdential and tight mmrimincial bu
trispe,&jr StMctural, plumbing, mechanical, and Wactfia, onde requirameMs.
IAPMO Rumbing ftiV-edw 30100t Pr*ct EXP8r`i8n00--
Affiliations; SaIlding Inspector it, County of Butte, CA
IfflematiOnO? C060 COund" Dulles ircluded assisting with permit applWavon in O-ka and plan neck
and Grganizing msting on inspection requests. Xso Perlblrl`rs 8
vaddV of structural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical inspectons,
on bolb, residenVal. and light commemia,' buildings, tnspecW Land.
structures, and rnatehWs f6t oomptlanoe *ft plannN. zoning, health,
and bulWkig codes, Maintained detsRed records of inspedions, code
err fam.ment invwWaUons and public requests for informaticm,
rd Canstructkrn
Owner, Rick Tre
Worked with architects and engin eerspmPafirg OAS and
speorjcat[op�s for resWential and commercial Projects- PTOPared
contracts using sub conlractor and mai*rjaj suppll r bids delsifing
scope of work and die buiserent schedule$. SupeMsW and
=rdinated labor, sub-contractms. and mr nidpa,`. uWW8S tO COMPlY
Wfth Sippeabte mdes and terms of coact. Conducted SafetY
eeings with. onsi, -0, MSHA,
.10 pam -1,
M =npjj8nM with CaL
Carffwn�a Code of RegWafions. -ritle 8.
move ForwaM vitt'i confi<"e"'De
— I t0� --
I/_,L-. �-
CIty of Costa Mesa
SuildEng and Fire Plan Check and Inspection
Project Experience
...............
F
Flroject Experience
Bureau Verilas has a long-estaWished and sumessful track record providing outside plan check and Wd
inspecVon servioes, We have ittOudad detailed descup!fors of our ralWed pro,-,ied expedwirm in and aroured
the negicn.
Phar Review S"ices
City of Roseville
Cantoct: Gone piaollni, sulwigna officlal
311 Vint
Roseville, CA MTO
(916)774-5-200
Date$ of Serviue: cunt
Bureau Vef1as is currenI4 providing buiWing plan revew services fc
the City of RoseviIto' - Example prwects include.
Westfie-ld Gallerla Tenant hnprovement Project ftlleau WitaS
was contracted to provide expedite mview of ten8nt improvement
age to one Wing of the Wes&
projects torebuild 260,0W SF of dam
Galleria Mail- WeOeW. LLC selecW Bureau Verfts to provide fina
reviF,,w of all tenant puns for Landlord mquimments in a=rdanca v
WestfieWs RetaD Tenant Cfiteria Manual and Tenant %mprovernent
PeTm ft AppliraWn i'v anual.
r.nnmgr?Pn4 w4hthe Landla 'S tenant r"SW.5ureQV V0FJWs staff
T419 24 Caffomis Code of Reg tion requirements adopted by the C5ty of RoswAle. Upon compVton
at Lartdlcqd requirements and code mview by Bureau Veritas, Plans were SgaMped with BWeau Veritas
plans were
rewe-w-
'Reviewed foranai CodCompliance` seats and the wigisignatums of the plan, vier, T1,
opted by the City of Rosevilie and a perwR to 001,StrUct was issued "over the countee,
Tenant Improvernent Wars were initially reviewed by Wes tfield tenant c0ordinatOrs for Weral comp7
Vgh mandatory assfftetic requirements. After pfw-14ng go -neral comphance, retial plans were subnfiltOd
as r�wn4- pdf drawings to a Wastfield FTP site created Sped1rally for Sureau Veritas to process plan
'tes staff downloaded andraviewed plats electmicaly, mdlWng and commenling
eviews. Bureau verk ns with meM.
p comz
cfirecty on plans, and then uplo� the ply back to the WestSeid FTP site, "rrs and arillecls, PERM Redly ta
meett
were ftn formTded to or placed on anothw FTP site wised by designers, ong,i
were tovised in s=rdance w,;th redlines and comments and maubm:i1ted eledronicaliy. If all dams were
resolved, two sets of hard copy plates, with appropriate seals and pro*nialal signature$, vmro provided for
es
approval by Bureau' wfts- Once approved, hard copy pans were ascoftJ to the C4 by W tflaid, and
permits were obtained.
Eledronic plan. submittal an.4 comenfi
mng all for ecormiical movernent of plans and qux tumaround,
61iminating sit ippmg time and costs, Using free Adobe Acrobat so tare, electronic Plans with comments
wul-J be Wewed and discussed with tenant, ft-siqper. and plans examiner as needed to resolve ire
qui My and efficiently. Con-wfrerl reWekv of Landlord and code issues ellminated at utast one or= re review
cycles, shortening the time netessary to approve plans. Wesnaeld was We to p4aMize ft order of Wiew
10 00joc4e Witfi ftl needs of tenants and mall rebuilding conatnrclion --emdoles.
1( ai Prove Fa -ward with ConWence
KIM -111131511
Rik
V'annet#i Foods a Flan Review
Owupancy Group(s); B, i'" 1, $1
Type of Corrilmaom VS ESFR Sprinklered W Unlimited area
Stam__ t
Building Area: Suite 100 = 42,855 SF
Tenant Improvement convemion of exi�finq warchousa to food pmeessing f=ffly for €r id and qui t, frozen
pasta prod tom. tmproven*nts induded elecftal, ra cban 1, plumbing aiW fire Irk -safety upgrades faa
preparaWn, cool g and packaqft operations In a clean envirmrr enL Man check also ;*nd ded i•°ire Code
review of cryogenic gnas used it packaging.
Building and Safety Administration
cin
CRY of West Sacrament
Contact ftody Good%in,
hof Building Official
9110 Wast Ca t#1 Ava. 2nd Roar
West Sunvvnto, CA SMI
(916) 617
Da tA € f Servi . 1 — prosent
Bureau Veritas is proud to be part of the legaq of excvHen
cu mea` service that the City of West Sammento enjoys today. Our team of prokissionas provides
complete ptarr review, permit counter, fire plan review and field irmpection services that include cornplvnce
with Title 24; Bart g and 1 -ft 24, pert 2 for fire and life safety, code irrterpmtation, and r mommwW tion
for Altonna a eras sof fire prectecfiw� for razors than a decade. We a1w p ,de support in the Building
De;partrant regard fire code issues; participate in Wning for the Building Department, and other
departments of the Cft including. tib Fire Depanment.
City Hall: Completed in fiber 2€1 3, this landmark building in the City of West Sa-mrnente has set
ft tons ter the revitWi7stion of West Capital Avenue, the City's rna rn thorough re. This WDject came in on
me and under budget moth the h p of our p4an ewers ar'ad inspectors. becorning .an Megral part of The
construcfim tearn, Total ns CEan valuatiOn for ft W101w S $8,238.659,
River~ Cats Stadium: The River Cats has beome synonymous ,NM family fun and great sport. Our
pennant winning team provides tow -cost fury and huifda community pride rict onfly for the CRY of West
Sacramento citizen's but for the. entire $actamento area. it hasnow to rid a venue for r usi=l events that
normally wov.1d to wnducted mit of ft area. Once terra our Wan chsck team and inspocWrs mntinuatly
work etc with Rimier Cats management team to bring the safest expeftnw possible for ever m.
Move Fww d with Confidence
West Sacramento continued
CaISTRS Headquaftem* The ovfiner desked to 90ieve
a Lin ED Gold naling on the now headquartem buildinq,
which inowpomied ffdxed-use elements and energy -
efficiency into the design and operation. Consequentiy,
not only were minimum standards of code enkrcad, but
our tnspectzar- af-Recmd also mon 'ed that plans and
spm r=lions were Wowed closely to achieve #w desired
LEER Goldlingdestriabon. Additionally. construction
utirmed a un€que "tear-buikl" approach to enable
st-muVaneous deve4MW and construction that redowd
W,ann" time as welt as devwlopmeat and constnicton
casts.
fuel Cell Facility- The facifity wNch has been open for more Man 6 years, is on th ut 'g edge of
,N th
autornofive fuel Wchnotogy. Its main drMng force is to find efficient rnetmds of fuel W,&(XIt0XPl0Ri e
throughomt the world.
exishng parojeum supplies
Jackson Laboratory, This ever growftg Faboratary raiises genebmily aftered mice in CWan rooms to
anges and defects to a normal DNA sys-teTn. This is the
discover' and date"; fte the OUtCOMSS Of WOtic ch
X
largest fac7l.-'Ly Gn the West Coast and is a,dI-mx,,t support for ft UC Dayss An'rnel Facility Captor
Old Dominion Freight Una: This project �ndiudes a 75,274 square foot trucking terminal. 19,118 square
foot maintenaace shop, 14,466 square Foot dock canopy and 3.200 square foot fueting station Ceropy. Tsta,"'I
pMect valua!ion is appmxjmately $9.5 mPlmn.
arters and food d--,sWWi0n WRY Was
Tony's Fine Food: phis majol- expansion for Tony's headqL n of a 77.000 square foot burdi-nq
-wmpleW in 2.010, 'The 316 nillfion project �=Juded the now con strusf 4o
to ho se a new freezer and an automated distribution warehouse, as well as the renovation of existing
warehouse and offim space. Challenging f8aturfi$ of the Tonys Fine foods facility"kncluded a MmPutS(OBd
Ration of one of ft lwgest
system that controftd hvi,,11 "nes W, the extensve Teft1gargdon system and mWa en
and I -
PV systems on the roof in the SWOOf CaIKOMM- We leve,,aged our toca[ mg;stered CC
mrfified plan,,raview staff to pm -vide proatfive responses on codelconstrucuability IsWes, such as with the
ammanin system and adjustmont of the inner rack sprinkler system. Atso, wa- established a n" sys%m, of
inspection hereby each suboontraclor GOW-4 r0q=4 hisftr awn inspections.
w -h
CEMEX- The cmstru6on ar 6 Silas Wit along the Port of SacrameriVs:shipping con -at onah%d CEMEX
to create a fteility caped ta of handling 125 million tons of cement The West of the six sates dsw lo 222
feet- The project encompassed various phasesAypes of reinforced conmte construcrmm Concrete for ft
i
massive silos was placed using a sl;p fann conStrucftn,
Move Fonvard with Canfidence,
IKEA stDre: This 330,000+ sq., ft, retail fadtity has
a corn icated exiting lq zzn, rr-arty mixed uses, and
design with, s#rF�.t EuTopean guidelines Uhatdo not
arrays match `fide 24 mq4 T1% ngrrts, Trm KEA pry
the ecibno system was extensive and WMPW Wh4e We
Wilding Wifty a -.G called for high Fite atom kW WAS
apps a*d taty 36 tt,19 3 as wail mita incorporating r a
Oornpaox flra spenkist system. Git s"s were added to
help claft thte door locations, upstairs.
Nippon Sht&Mn
This is a 2-stoey now food processin, bctUn� packaging and warehouse facHay ful- manufacturw Of
liquid sauce p ucm Plan chook inc lud-W stuctural, fi€m4if>a safety, fare code, onargy, green, medianical,
plumbing, and ak�atdcal review of plans and calculations for C*Wli� wkh applicable 2010 Cd&rnia
constructuon Codes. B:ui;di.ng is appro)dmately 68,700 SF structure oWstruded of tlht-up c-fyrete wags With
WaTior stent frarr ed walls and composite sewnd fluor deck. Building O=parry Groups t3, F 1, an"i S2.
Building Plan Chack and Courter Technician
Cit of Costa Neves
Contact: Khanh Nguyen, BuDdi, Offoial
(714) i. -27i
Bureau 'colas -has pro ded building plana check servims for residential ark comnmrclal pzolwties to the
City cif Costa Mesa for the past :3 years. We .also pr'ovlWed counter techniclan, serVms as oa*slie extension
of staff. In addi"n we have placed a mgislured ciW enW, new, to assist uritis all building :plan check -,n,8OdS.
uildi g and Safety Plan Check
County of Los A agales, CA
leo Rai Patel, .Supers sten nt of Building, (626) 468-3100
900 & p meant Avenue
harnbra, CA 911D3
Sim 20 03 Bureau ila-S has Wert PTOviding bw1ding and safety ptan mvmw and inspection sol -vices to
ft Caun:y. We have placed plan check pwson l is the Cwj ty`s Pd em ra headquarters- ese staff
memo us have provided o consulting and training fur the County's SVuctura% EWWical, Plumbing and
Mechanical Plan Review c-tiorfs_ This has included creating and preparing �J°slfucticn manuals.: pmwntinq
ining woreshops. and pro rrg a"aeded fWd inspection br a to agency ;plash chuck an4 field
pers<onne,, Gotunty Wde - 000+ people), We have provided p°mrr review sarVzes for plans rewlV d from We
County"s ffeld Offices, and conSiSterttly met Ow County's IW513 review s aduse_
M ._ move Forviard with; nfFdence
Pian Check and Inspection Service$
C[W of China Hilus
contacts Winstrari VWdrd. Building Offidal
(9,09) 364-2790
e are pmviding SiAding & Sa ty Plan chick arid 1 pe ion 4-tvicas for wmmercial, indushriel and
rnsidant,ql pa . ra
rt rmet ' gime s include a Kean Chwk Engineer+ oAir lt-tk G t the City
MW prov i g assiaWnce to the My ml the absenre of the Suir�dft official. one Building tri ` tS 8180
assigned1� i7� w,
dministratJon
city of Murfma
Contact: AMn Bre, Djwntar of the Building and Safety OMamara
(951) 11th
B re €tcurfenUy priding buMing plan check and fire code inspE&jon SOMMS fOT WO CRY Of
f, Mures.. These sates jniGlude plan review M�ffS x 00MMeMal, induseriai and res ri of PWOMW
as well as fim rate iion, #d ti�lty, Sumau �s provided l t 6m BuiWirig Offia�i�f ser�ic�e� %r
well
tate city,
Plan ChezR and lnsPaCdOn Services
cit of Jupa valley
Newly incorpurated dty lry the County c f Riverskle. We are praysding Puri �hsck and lrspecOon Setvices
and we cLuenvy have a Certifivd Plans Examiner wosking in the city ender .fig direcUon of the City offi6al,
Third Party Budding .and Infmstructure inspection
Contact: Dan Sava
(6 10) 299-5077
prey Vdin insp i ore end puri retie Etat r► t i ani tib r i rFae and . t t of e r g
nomes in supper of housing privat tio�-, ;at the Vandenberg Ali, Ferro Baw. This €onlViCta a involves
Mn of 14he community renter 3rW swirnfting psi. Duties and ape of work include ravlevw4rrg e�d
eppC• a+''a r. true rungs. change orders, and providir mar ry ptan rew, , in p tion, and p rem
reporting for this 000 pmjoe-
h4ova;=oraard with Confider=
uliding Plan Review, & Ins.pection, CaIPERS Headquarters
Ulf V Q XiMAMM
Client; Ktoinfetr
Contact., Ted Olen, f nAger,
Constructan MaterfaLs Testing
3077 Me Cr,,
(916) 1701
ate'5 of service.. 2t 2WO
Bureau Tiles was commissioned to prime an
ADA B 24 ssrbiiity Surveys for the State of
California's GaRERS Retinwmnt headquarters luted
in 6=9mento. Our duces inct d the review and
Mspection of the exter r and intoner to the facllity as
well as to review and inspect ,ate site for access compliance, The inspection included thousands of photos.
Det2iW rep is for each of thin floors were devatoped. Bureau VbCdas also proviftd building ftpmgon
and t jaffty assurance setvi s for tt $200 mil. iOn CaEPERS expnsion project, Two Bali -time instars
were onsite to provide requited building inspection set*ces. stroll as to € versee all spial inspections grad
testing faT the project. Three CaIPERS bui ings are lamed at 400 0 Strew, Sacramento. The CaIPERS
Lincoln Plaza EasVVVest expansion build: -mg is 560,000 sf. o4ove ground with *Mw and rill, 440,0W sf.
bw lev0s i eiow ground, and iftetudes 1,000 parXing spas. The CWPERS Lir udin Plam Nora buii+ding is
a six -story, 492,900 sf. once aftrd retail but1ding with 190,000 sf, of parking one eeground;, with 415
The bigtech nature of the hiiiiding and desire to achieve a Li FID GoW rating brought numerous technicai
c�talfangas moo ted with poterdiel gfOUnd'farOtOf i MOS With balo�r�ra patldrtg levels and irat�rpara ra
of a six -story atrium and smoke con1. Our ftpector-of-Record superAsed special inspectors and
proactively maimtsined tales communication w t'i'c the owner, construction manaqri, wW stakeholders (e.g.
including the State Fire MarshaIrs office) to address aronges punk and to ft satisfaction of the owner
One WIMm incAuded re=mmandi r g and obseiving coli snx*e t"ting to monitor that smoke control gevels
would most #ire code requirements within the six -s" slVium. This was succewfuDy done on the initial blat.
Our s also provided detailed insoaffonrepods wbicta also a'fe d ra=nmendaWns to of derrtiy glue
code iwves diJ " consUidan phase.
Move Forward wilh Confiderme.
3_
Cfty of Com mesa
F ; f Building and Fire Plea Check and Inspection
fl' XP
erlence
Solana Count
Cont &L: David Cliche, Chief Suitding Official
75 Tse St S00 55500
Falffield, CA 04533
(707) 374-2205
d cil v 0i8-nocounty.co
Govemment Bultdinga Th six- tr y offiCe building sawas
nearly $00 County yrs_ "+ itb: ar u-6pla O=Pali
Within tt^m 300.0 squ foot, Type 1, AFF -S, Pyre resistive
$VU0W0. th4, tyle of constnwf-,on is the h.j9 r st standard
rs,ji ,d by ft JCC srd exceeds FEhtA 353 CrWha,
ParXing Structure: In a dditiGn to the Government Su ,diN,
there is a rpm st*rya 3W,000 square foot, Type 1. ,APES, open
Parking Garage. This building tan a=m date rn'cre than
1,GW vehWes and indiudes the Seer d stOr 90 for S01anc
co'unly sn iff and Police offiretrs patrol VoWes.
Alte adve E nerV PrOJOCtS
High wat Pact (162
y��r�W)am+.� hooh Wind Farm (z1 d0 �i#RY
,ont&3Firrfl a Hills Wind Fat(40 MW)
1 n -o County needed the technk al support to electronically
prom, re-lievi per„ archive all jitsliigent data, and
inspeat the qusiity of work needed to Meet IbO W40mia
DU96,r► a requifementsfbr construction. S01anO COUMY
needed Engineprs and Inspecwts v ith qp ffc experience
e
in s uduml obsewation (mandaled by CaU10MIQ Bui'AinO
Standards), Safety Pm9rarns, CAD Weld `besting, High Poo
Te& g, Und+i round P to Transformers, DAMbut nF
and mete E°.eicsl Transfer StatioRs.
Bureau VaMas was able to pfovide assistSnCe ftic thO Q0*0
dommenj review and conte PMO s. Buzau verfts also
?rip€an rged the ntrre plan review service e18cteG-n'iCR11Y
vjIng Jirrw and me n:ei . Bureau Vi�s also provided
eXp i n. d, jechnioal, and competent QnginocA t<g and
inspec!�On staff fir multiplS P @cts-
urequ Vorejta% a leader in 2ie world fig- QHSE sewices for
Wind FaTms was s'A to PTqvida rnu tips. servi*es in a timely
manner that also provided the client with a secure orrlonS
archive of ail %rcrk completed.
Move Forivard withCOnfift-Me
Plan Review Services
City of UncWh
cont= -t: 'Ibdd CunnIngham
600 Sixth St
Un n, OA SSW
(916) 4344470
Dates of SOMOO, 2W5 –? f
Bumau Veritas staff reviews plans for a wide range of
pfor Me City of Umyolrt- Since the slid of our
re zLionship Wah the City we haw reviewed several
complex projeds such as the Twelve Bridges Golf Course
—A (1-mintryflhih %%avaml nnrpAler Wean sets far new
I
residefttial develop"Ot. and to retail facTjieaF ammiq otheM. We have AKO pMvAed seveml inspectors
over the years to provkfe Mspection so-A**s to lba City WhOA thO CRY underwent unprecedented graoYth in
recen'. year.
Plan Review Services
city0faudingame
Contact toseph cyr, Chwaund-Ing Offitial
501 pfimmse R&
Buylingame, SCA 90-10
(M) 558-7260
Dates of somce- 2003 – Pressat
sureau vwitas staff reviews plans for a w4e ranse of
projects fat Me City of Bufflngarn.e. Staff has reviewed ...
commercial buildings, mnd-orninlunis, offince buildirs,
medical offices, residential pry, tenant IMPMOMOntS of
various OornpWales as WOO as buimings for assembly occuparss. Bureau Vefts providt-, a plan mWew
Mcensed engine twD days per week to the Uty.
Mme Fe-rward wim Gonfidance
Inspection Services
CW of Rancho Cbrdova
Conct, Elimbeth Sparkman
2729 Pmspeat Park Dr.
Rancho Cordova, CA SW70
(M) "1-8714
Dates of semce-, 2005 — PMSont
Buteau VeMas pToVides a luil firma Sr, Combinsuon BuiEdiria
InspectDr to the City W Rancho Qxdovs who works as an
extension of the City staff and We to perform many dally
iftspe-ctions as well as plan re0m. Reoent Projeats include
the construcWn of a now Walgreens, the MatheT cWnpus
office building arA a CVS pharmacy. Other recent pmjects
allso include:
Cordova Restaurant and Casino; Our inspectorhas
beer- Involved with the Cordova Restaurant and Casino
pm,�ed "Ich lerluded ft WW rornodel of an existing
belying, The buiWing and site needed to tw brought up to
current 2ccessibirdy standards while complying W�th a Vqhf,
constructon time %t -a.
Target. This projecft inc4uded the =slruction of a now target
store. Bureau Varitas staff, had to enure that the extrOw-01Y
Oght constnxXon schedule couberet.
KohPs-. This 78,398 square foot prq1W inotuded the MmPletO d-OMOV60n of ,,he Intaftor of an wrist rig
Menqnts reW stere as wall as the irderlor improvements for KoW's. The project was completed an a very
*bifily upgrades to the e:dsbng entranws and
tight nst
coructon =hedula and induded autftor aooesv.
pmk-ng[Dt
-
dence
Mova Forward with Cont
r.
CRY of Costs Mesa
Building and Fire Nan Check and Inspection
Project Exparience
Claybank Adult Detention Facility
$won* coumly
250 Clay Sank Road Fairfield CA 94533
Date of Review - May 4, 2011 - March 2012
Reviewed In conk=anoe with the 2010 California Suj�.dinq, Simi i, Mechan�"x, Pwmbiaq. Erre-My. and
Green SuNing Codes. This ucture z a 127,800 square. fad, 2 -sty buftng composed of steel framing,
steei flow decking with c;Dncrete infill, StW rW decking and CMU tnterior and exterior malls_
OakPark Senior Housing
CRY of Sao-ramonto
3820 Broadway Stmt Sacramento, A 95817
Date of R evL-w - I Z"f)=, 11- 2+162012
Reviewed in confbimance wfth the 2010 Cakkrnia SuiWing, EleWcal, Machantai, Nurntng, Enew, and
Green SuNding Codes- This projW Camlisted of a three story wood and stW tamed building W�th open web
wood Ra trusses and pTemanufactured wof Vussw. The gmund floor =its of mixed use o=pancies
inducing carnmerdal businew, met mite and anembly use, and resi�denlialdwelffnq units. Dm s=nd
and third floe consist entirely of residenW1 dweVing a=rnrnadations. The buff ding was desigred with a
fire -resistive constructkn type V-A with NF PA4 3 fire sprinkler system and sepambons,
Third Party Plan Review
O -W of Sfockftn
Sumu veMas fmitluentjy provides third party pW review services to ft City of Sbddw,. We have pr aided
full para review as well as partial pion review to dients requiring a quidA tumaround, or who may have
compfe,x imams MeWin.9 Won review eqineefs with specialized e"nence.
Padial list e, recent ,p is indude,
a Staples DistribLdion Womhouse - 401,ODO squarnfeet - Addftn
a University Plaza Weterfront Hotel - 7-81ory - RemoM
0 Super Walmart Revisions T 180,000 square feet
Cost Pius World Market - Ti Convemlon to Mercantile
Ch et BroaOcasting - Ti - 17,000 square feet bmd,=Aing Willy
0 Move Foiward with GoOdence
Poser and UVI Wes Example Projects
AnWopa VaNay War One Ranch
Los ArtoolleosUfa �s@ Ctunj�tty DepaArmnt of ubft Works
��(
Located in she Antelope �Mlley area of North t_os Angel County, the 230MW ptOX-d wCl peaduce enough V-Avlteoly
to meet 40 an,74ual e-nefqy rte of about 75,= avoVgs homes, dC�nq ;apprmma ly 140,WO tette tons of
Garb n d�xlde (CO2) ger ar:::. he eq'tfwa t of taking about 30,E :mrs off road, Whemn fu4y operatisonal the
pMaa will be Sana of ft lafgesd PV projects in the wMd. Sited on pared slyMdm rbed agricultural land, There are no
threw rtes or agWangumd Weles on the s�te, and ft projea +WAi rum use water fm elm g erms.. At 230 MW
this is the aaTest Photo Vonaic projett Fn Non h America.
anpah Solar Power Complex Stations
3,92 MW F l—elios?tat Nllrrur Technology
clien-t: 8dghtsoume Energy
Compliance Manager 4 ,S. Bursas of Land
Delwjaw Chic' Su0na ofr4al segvic.es (C aEafornia
F Sny Common)
S Pian qew
4 Ce Inspoctoas
0 Fire Safety Services
W Safety Ins, G2ions
a BVhst Proj . Management
Germm Solar Eawrvy P
250W4 A' - Concentrated sdor elle genomting foollity
Client Nex[E-m Energy Resources
Compijartce ManaW (U.S. Bureau of Land Management)
Delegate h Bt�Elrtfl1 Services
Plan ee
Fite Safety Beres
Safety Inspections
Vnet Pml-vil f enagemmnt
— ��
Civil Engineering Project Experience
As-N,aede4 Ensinearing - Road Projects
County of San Diego
Bureau Veritas has been providiqg project plannnq and drel engigar el'ing de"n servioes for a vaftty of
road proms on an awmede, basis for mwe than 15 years. Example pn�jecta include.,
Beer Valley Parkway Improvements: Bureau Varitas was respoasNe fm WN design work and preparaton
of PS&E for roadway expansion and irnpmvomend, including expafdnq ft road fry M two t0 Ur lat'.105,
storm drain and flood control strixtures, traffir. signal modiftaftns, addiftris of bike tan -as -;n each directon,
low- tion arW angineering of retaining walls, traffic striping and signing moffrgcat�rs, preparation of a rght-
of-way plan. preparation of SWMP and amps, as wefl as public outreach to reMdants affected by m4way
mxNfifimtions inciudirT changes t0 drive YS pmfikm. Due to rater on both sides of, the 6ght�f-wny. a
nrajlo7, chaftnga was to find a feasible altemat"we that has the least impact on ft e*Csting pmpedy owneM
DjvWon I Mtengnoo Headqverftr&Tvmpo Road Intersection Improvements: Bureau Ventas
prepared PS&Es ind. udf-ng taft Oans, traffic StOping adjusinwats and traffic Signal modifizationg, vertical
and hod=ntal roadway alignmenis, SWPPPs, utifity ralocagDns and s " modifications fw constucVon
of site Impmements. We designe4 the $Re to maintain maneuverability for large veM, cles in a FrrftJ area.
Spr fng Valley and 4S Ranch PrAfift Stga-81 Interconnect PrOJOCtS; In Spring VaNey bureau Vw tiag
pravided bass mapping and resign !of 12 mixes of conduit and Mmr optic canduch-DT to connect 28 Lraffic
signals to a central Traffic Management Center (TIMC). We also provided a his of Design D=qment
arA a Communicatlem Mmter Plan to estabEsh the system ardiitecture and wmrnunltiotts PrOWAI to
integrate real-time video mondodnq arA demaad-basad signal operations wOoln ft virtual ThIC, At 4S
Ranch, we prepared PS&Es tointemonnect a furtar 16 signals.
Civil Enginterring aesign a Support Services
CrW of Pilftburg
Over a 30 year history woriking with the Pu is Words Department, Sumau 'ergs staff has provided design
angim-oring for street draixiair, and pipeline projects throughout ft City,
Loveridge Rr Waftritno,, Phase I.- Bureau Veritas designed this 3,OMfbot, 20 -inch wateMne projea
This pmject will extend the ditty's water pipeline fmm a connection point in the Piftsbura-Aroti YALA Kqt"y
to a pa7snt nodh of the BNSF railroad h-acks and pmvide water to oxisfing and new delvelopments 810,19
LovofWge Road., north of the PlU0uM-Anf*och Highway. The pmjact was cijsllerqWd by a wakefte corridor
that is obstructed by many oxisfing uWfts, a cteek aossing and ft =Ssimg of the SNSF rafted tracks
that vvill require a jack. and bore operabon. Permits from outside agencies were required. The City MU%t
compMo improvement milestones wiftn the time resMetions; of existing agreements, Bvireau Varitas
was Comm Med to workirg wAh the City and to meeting the changing constraints of 11ho prcjectso ftt the
construchbn contract dccurnents was delivered to the City and the construction was COMWAftd =M95fullY
and w0in the lime consUaints.
Muve Fwwwd M0 CorrRdence
-I RC1
C4 of Costa Mesa
X Building and Fire Plan Check and Inspection
Project ExWence
Civic Center Complex & offsfte Storm Drainage System: Bureau Veit las'pro%ssional staff p-mvided
site engmeering and infrastructure design, for City of Pfttsburg's $23 million govemment complex on Qpwt
I team, Bureau Wdtas staff members dasi�gr-ed all, utiflities and
Avenue, 'Working Wdh the architar-tura
infrastructure serving the 17 awe campus, induding gradipq and drainage ftr more than 6 acres of parkiag
and mflecting pm!s- In order to pr&Ade suffident drainage capacity for the complex, Bureau Verilas staff
designed a 2.000 W extwftion of Me CiVs siarm drain syWom along DoWi Avemte, indudiN a wrminW
pumping station to I?ft stoT m. drainage Into existing drainage facAties abiV Parkslide Dtive.
PUbu'irg Marina and Wate&*at Improm meNS. aureau Veritas staff mornhem designed over $10
h
m W lion thsin and devep
loMnt Of . in wateftnt impmverrtents for the City of Pit These included ape g
th
e 9 bar M
firth RNam MaTina, Central Harbor, aWments of the George 1-awy Brim, and the Fftburg 24
Yacht Ciub.. Out slaff designed the sheMpgo bTwAwater aild pro%cVve worAr. for the Central Haftf, as
welt as innovating the use of lash barges for the ere MOnCYrepa . ir of the exrsU-ng rubWa mound breaks tar
pTdtscfinq Riverview Marir
Addltion� fedarall.y4unded projetks Included the design of Buchanan Road under ft Federal: Aid Urban
Program, the development of aEgnment studies f0T the Ptopmed 2 mW for James Doftn BOU10V8W
extension, dmgn of a downtown parking lot, and Pitlsbu!g's truck route study among otthers.
Anaheim Canyon M-atralInk Pedesteian Improvement PrOJOCt
City ofAn& 4 heim ng design ser vices W Create a n==ry, sa%, and attractme pedestri
an
Bu ms VeWms provided angineen.
trave; way (compfiant with both City of Anaheim wid ADA mquiraments) almiq E. Le PWmD Avenue kOm N,
Ktaemw Boulevard to N, Tustin Avenue and a&ong N. Grove Street from E - L's Ralma Avenue, Connecting
the kcal commundy to and from Anaheim Canyon Metrotink Staan. Due to the h" reons which
are provided by the US, Depailment *f ,,nn roe's Econoyrfic Dave�opment Administration (EDA). 1h4
y described as work within e4afing
$7.275 mi'1mn praied has been 50ft Oto Wo significant phases,, Senora fl
right-of-way and work outer existing tVht-of-way. The first phas-9 incJuded haMsmping and landscaping
. tmprovements to upgrade existing sidmaNscar cbse gaps along both Me north and awth sides of E. La
palm,a Aware ue from Kmemer Bou!svmd to North Tustin Avenue -
The nardwimpmvemeats en repass sW6w3*s, aeled ddvmas. amid D-mrep itint m
at curb
miums. Bureau VeWas engaged in face-to-fam ffmatings WAh business owners and pry vWW presenta0orls
to ft ftnninq Department Bmd" Waldrop, Bureau Ven ae Pqjev, Mamager. presented SWt dman
plans at a pub.fic oulmeawwkshop-
uso of the federal gmnt by
ect Sr;ope to optimCge the
rig tin design pro wssw mar team revised the pro
Tadditional improvenwnts are essentie� in
enhandna pedesVisn access and inlagratng the cGrridor. hese 'an traffic beyond
mzx�rnizjng the efficiency of the p*68SWan System and are anticipated to maxim4a pedesti
R -
pafDns pre wnted in ft grant appkcation-
m execl
an 03 budge
Measutes to ciantrol costs have incZudad proactiv project management m thly r ev is, of '
Saod"den0caVon of risks and mifigatior, measures. ule, and actjoq, {terns with dient; and eaely ,
Move Forward With C01fidenoe
Cit of Cosu Mesa
Building and Fire Flan Check and inspection
Project Experience
rookhurst Street Parliament sewer Improvements
Carden Grove Sankary Ddstd
The project involved preparat-on of construc on pians and specifio'ations for approximately 6.500 lineal feet
of 1Z to 18• replacement sir on Brookhurst Street and Parliament Avenue. The act also included
a d-oubte barrel inverted siphon which required Ocking and bwing under the existing Anaheim -Baru
City Channel. Bureau Venters coordinated vr`rth County of Orange Property Parmits for the design of the
steell casins and camer pipe throu;h their right-c►f-way. Clher prciect mnponenta included sufveying fbr
preparation of fts fare map and geotechnical inves afkons for pieparalion of ft geotechnical report
San 01ago County Women's Detention'FUHRY
County of Son Dego
Bureau 1 ritas prowAW prellrnioery civil design services and is now preparing t final design for a state
ffm-art 1,216 bed wmen's detention facility to replace ft ouWated Las Cohnes women's jail. The two-
phase project is being dWiverad under a dign-build, neWdated best vaiue procumment with a total proet
oast of $289,2K The 45 -am site is to ted adjacent to the anvt:rortrr ental y sensitive Bern Diego mer and
the Santee Town Center, and is designed to provide a normaWe, carnpus4lke t3nvimn ent to blend in with
the community. Civil design efforts include.
E,1vJ:ronrmntW C dl4 aeon--Currenffy prfh=ing ciou c=dinatn with County onvkonmental
staff, resource aganci :. FIR aM the MIMP for ft site to avoid impacts and delays reWtad to
regur atory water coin onsite, while processinq, the re ui d permit packages,
Starmwater Compflan Pmviding fual store wmler documents to r rrtply with the ER General
Construction P'orrrrit, LEER old, LID. hydromodification and RWOCB requirements.
Flo pu io Impfovern+n —Furnishi nq design of Riverview Parkway, Cotto nwood Avenue, offsi2fir
fifties, traffic s eals, storm dmio and Woe%=pe improvements to comply with lel &:tandards,
lltifity Relocations and New Sens I s�gnln!q remotion of water and sewet Maims. as well as
coo -di ting mtowtion of axisUng inch Hp qas main with SDG&E to r r the site for the pro, '
•Right�of�'+q aye rdyina sir_yp�+3Pyrovii+diry��q+�gr}oor�dii�nbaticn� CGfy a�igi�ryfVh"p�lt of a��praytalar,�tllons mqured to fiscililale
�iA1 indudin re t deli alions, easement acquisitions s and 4[l�}51i1��& Right-of-way
d ume tion will also be per ded in coordination with County staff and surveyo .
• Grading Plans—Grading designed to elevate the bu fcl rng pads above the 9 byIDIRr flood, wN19
prevldaing fora series of �ow maintanaarm water quality basins and Wio-swakisto enhance water
quality and provide oomplianoe with water, quality regulations,
Onsite t litie Provided preliminary design to serve more than 25 structures in tvo phases
rnp'Ksing over 500,000 sl" of floor area, Due to 5m , -ted maintenance mess within ft secured
pedrnslar a design: was de ' --aped utilizing entiroiy private uMtj systems includ3no fire seMoe,
patsble war°, mWwwd laigation, roof drainage, site storm drainage and sandary seer: An
addi,"iibnal challenge was des ting the new system to be cons ctib and functional in Phme t
while keeping the e s r.g facility in soMce until the inmates =ld be relxaled to the now fa ufts.
p
Move. Fwwa- f WM Ceiifideoce
PER
OL,r # ,N r l is our m iVmnt to the succ of the City of Costa Mesa by help4vg yon - i�°itr$i,I
significant qjality and exist saving benefAs movilg forward. These include:
Reduced plan raiilaw turnaround Umes
imp rr menta establish e�nic plan raV&w processes
Commitment to maintain a Roble rate stru&wre
u stomi d rale opbons for the CRY Of �!� � such htrty, NTE, � ne later atc,
igtrly qualified SUff compan3ated commensurate vVith th r dtdifA ar4 waponsibiliti
Confi er ce of working w th a well-estabrished consuftnt in busirms I.Or 180+ YeOfs
w.jq rates for proms pemonnal are oul rmd bee r.
IbAcwlerWad Plan Review MT12.5%, abOvO the fees ShOwn
Rt"� d 12S% a� them fees Shy. O MwfMe weir, ch� �W' OPp al the City
Tion rhe osmund � r l r r rr
iw'I:iive Frar+rt with ConfWenoa,
dd r6i at on Building Irmp too
70
ftnfo-r SuiWingnsp ` (Super r�
$7
�
ChiefofInspection
Plans Examner
$85
Plan Check Engineer
10
Chief Plan Check EnSin (Man 00
$105
Pemft Tochnician I JentlY [Oval)
Permit Tm+i:hniolan 'll
W
Permit Technician SupervisorWanager
Office Assistant I
5
Olfice Assistant 11
D
office Supervisodhla lar
55
Assistant Middip-g r l9S
#Sp
Fire pl ern r
95
Fire Ons tar
$96
$105
Fire Marshal
65
Corfu Enforcement 05
Sr_ CadeForcem-anal doer (Supe r)
$70
Chief of Code Enforcement (Manager)
75
IbAcwlerWad Plan Review MT12.5%, abOvO the fees ShOwn
Rt"� d 12S% a� them fees Shy. O MwfMe weir, ch� �W' OPp al the City
Tion rhe osmund � r l r r rr
iw'I:iive Frar+rt with ConfWenoa,
Plan Check Percentage Fee Option
Surest: veritas can offer a poscentage fee eption to the City of Coria Mme, for plan check Serves to be
performed:
Commercial Plan R"ew,,
FuH Pl&,i Review 86% of the Cilys collecW nonqesWentWl plan check feco
ResldentWl Plan R"-'ew-
Pul Plan Review 8.5% of ft City's residential plan cherA fee*
*Plan Review pemant agion Include Initial review and two rvch=Us. Third and subs,"uent rechacks
and plan changes or revislons vW11 be bitted as Time and Materials based on the hourly rates shown.
Move Forward vAth Conftdence
,— I �A --
ATTACHMENT 6
-11 55--
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
CITY OF COSTA MESA
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of June, 2012 ("Effective
Date"), by and between the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation ("City"), and
CSG Consultants Inc., 801 Park Center Drive, Santa Ana, Calif. 92705, a California corporation
("Consultant").
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent
contractor to CSG Consultants Inc. as more fully described in Consultant's Proposal attached as
Exhibit "A"; and
B. WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise
contemplated within California Government Code, Section 37103, and holds all necessary
licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and
C. WHEREAS, City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described in
Exhibit "A" (the "Project") and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection
with the services to be performed; and
D. WHEREAS, no official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions
of California Government Code, Sections 1090-1092, in the subject matter of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide the professional services described in
Consultant's Proposal, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein
by this reference.
1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their respective fields
and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by
professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound
professional practices. It is understood that in the exercise of every aspect of its role, within the
scope of work, consultant will be representing the City of Costa Mesa, and all of its actions,
communications, or other work, during its employment, under this contract is under the direction
of the department. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may affect its
performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect
Consultant's performance of this Agreement.
Consultant shall be solely and completely responsible for conditions of the job -site,
including safety of all persons and property during performance of the work, and the Consultant
shall fully comply with all State, Federal and other laws, rules, regulations, and orders relating to
the safety of the public and workers.
The right of -the Engineer or the City's Representative to conduct construction review or
observation of the Consultant's performance shall not include review or observation of the
adequacy of the Consultant's safety measures in, on, or near the construction site.
Construction materials and equipment may only be stored in streets, roads, or sidewalk areas if
approved by the Engineer.
1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City. Consultant agrees to perform all the work to
the complete satisfaction of the City and within the hereinafter specified. Evaluations of the
work will be done by the City Clerk or her designee. If the quality of work is not satisfactory,
City in its discretion has the right to:
(a) Meet with Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the
matters of concern;
(b) Require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is
satisfactory; and/or
(c) Terminate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.
1.4. Wag -an . Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this
Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws including,
but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and
safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers' compensation insurance and safety
in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from
and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every
nature and description including attorneys' fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered
against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which
may be incurred by reason of Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
1.5. Non-discrimination. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage
in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their
race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical handicap, medical condition, marital
status, sexual gender or sexual orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the
Government Code.
1.6. Non -Exclusive Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into
agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this
Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services
contemplated by this Agreement.
1.7. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set
forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written
consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ
other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant's sole cost
_I�i^_ PSA 11
and expense.
1.8. Confidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have
access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and
employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other
information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement
are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization
by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall
be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this
Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
2.0. COMPENSATI®N AND BILLING
2.1. Compensation. As compensation for the provision of services outlined in Exhibit
"A" and in accordance with this agreement, Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee
schedule set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Consultant's
total compensation shall not exceed five hundred thirty six thousand, one hundred twenty Dollars
($535,120.00).
2.2. Additional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services
provided outside the scope of services specified in the Consultant's Proposal or in an amount
exceeding $536,120.00 unless the City or the Project Manager for this Project, prior to
Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is
specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or
additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable.
2.3. Method of Billing. Consultant may submit invoices to City supervisor for
approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be
based on the total of all Consultants' services which have been completed to City's sole
satisfaction as of the date the invoice is created. City shall pay Consultant's invoice within forty-
five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the
services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. Any
additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as
"Additional Services" and shall identify the number of the authorized. change order, where
applicable, on all invoices.
2.4. Records and Audits. Records of Consultant's services relating to this Agreement
shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be
made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient
times for a period of three (3) years from the Effective Date.
3.0. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1. Commencement and Completion of Work. The professional services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective
Date of this Agreement. Failure to commence work in a timely manner and/or diligently pursue
work to completion may be grounds for termination of this Agreement.
-_. I �- PSA 11
3.2. Excusable Delays. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of
performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts
shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, material shortages, compliance with
laws or regulations, riots, acts of war, or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a
Ply
3.3 Liquidated Damages. In the event of inexcusable delays, for each consecutive
calendar day after the time specified in Section 4.1, Consultant shall pay to the City or have
withheld from moneys due it, the daily sum of $100.00.
4.0. TERM AND TERMINATION
4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a
period of 12 months ending on June 30, 2013, unless previously terminated as provided herein or
as otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. This Agreement may be extended four (4)
additional one (1) year renewal periods upon mutual agreement of the City and the Consultant.
4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of
canceling, suspending or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated
by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing written notice to Consultant.
The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of
termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering
services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City.
4.3. Compensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for
reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including
the date of City's written notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be
prorated as to the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in
accordance with the fees set forth herein. In ascertaining the professional services actually
rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall
be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings,
and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the
City or in the possession of the Consultant.
4.4. Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents
prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to,
finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings,
maps and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination
notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific
written authorization from Consultant shall be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal
expense to Consultant.
5.0. INSURANCE
5.1. .Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain, maintain, and
keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement all of the following minimum
scope of insurance coverages with an insurance company admitted to do business in California,
rated "A," Class X, or better in the most recent Best's Key Insurance Rating Guide, and
1 � q _ PSA 11
approved by City:
(a) Commercial general liability, including premises -operations,
products/completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket
contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily
injury with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence. If such insurance
contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this
Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(b) Business automobile liability for owned vehicles, hired, and non -owned
vehicles, with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence for bodily injury
and property damage.
(c) Workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California.
Consultant agrees to waive, and to obtain endorsements from its workers'
compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers'
compensation insurance policy against the City, its officers, agents,
employees, and volunteers arising from work performed by Consultant for
the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise
under their workers' compensation insurance policies.
(d) Professional errors and omissions ("E&O") liability insurance with policy
limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined
single limits, per occurrence and aggregate. Architects' and engineers'
coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If the policy is
written as a "claims made" policy, the retro date shall be prior to the start
of the contract work. Consultant shall obtain and maintain, said E&O
liability insurance during the life of this Agreement and for three years
after completion of the work hereunder.
5.2. Endorsements. The commercial general liability insurance policy and business
automobile liability policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a) Additional insureds: "The City of Costa Mesa and its elected and
appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are
additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with
the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises
owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; automobiles owned, leased,
hired, or borrowed by the Consultant.."
(b) Notice: "Said policy shall not terminate, be suspended, or voided, nor
shall it be cancelled, nor the coverage or limits reduced, until thirty (30)
days after written notice is given. to City.
(c) Other insurance: "The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary
r , PSA 11
Iqv
insurance as respects the City of Costa Mesa, its officers, officials, agents,
employees, and volunteers. Any other insurance maintained by the City of
Costa Mesa shall be excess and not contributing with the insurance
provided by this policy."
(d) Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City of Costa Mesa, its officers,
officials, agents, employees, and volunteers.
(e) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
5.3. Deductible or Self Insured Retention. If any of such policies provide for a deductible
or self-insured retention to provide such coverage, the amount of such deductible or self-insured
retention shall be approved in advance by City. No policy of insurance issued as to which the
City is an additional insured shall contain a provision which requires that no insured except the
named insured can satisfy any such deductible or self-insured retention.
5.4. Certificates of Insurance: Consultant shall provide to City certificates of
insurance showing the insurance coverages and required endorsements described above, in a
form and content approved by City, prior to performing any services under this Agreement.
5.5. Non -limiting: Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way,
the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which Consultant
may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.
6.0. GENERAL, PROVISIONS
6.1. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the
parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior
writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by
the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail
over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including
exhibits to this Agreement.
6.2. Representatives. The Chief Executive Officer for the City of Costa Mesa ("City's
CEO") or his or her designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement
and may issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of the City, called for
by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.
Consultant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who
shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of
Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement.
6.3. Project Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with
Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.
s i q PSA 11
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and be its
agent in all consultations with City during the term of this Agreement. Consultant or its Project
Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City.
6.4. Notices: Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications
concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery,
facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be
deemed served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal
delivery; b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 48
hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such
communication is sent through regular United States mail.
IF TO CONSULTANT:
CSG Consulting Inc.
801 Park Center Drive
Santa Ana, Calif. 92705
Tel: 714.872.6123
Fax: 714.568.1028
Attn: Khoa Duong
E-mail: khoa@csgengr.com
IF TO CITY:
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel: 714-754-5604
Fax: 714-754-4856
Attn: Khanh Nguyen
6.5. Drug-free Workplace Poli. Consultant shall provide a drug-free workplace by
complying with all provisions set forth in City's Council Policy 100-5, attached hereto as Exhibit
"D" and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's failure to conform to the requirements
set forth in Council Policy 100-5 shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and shall
be cause for immediate termination of this Agreement by City.
6.6. Attorneys' Fees: In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection
with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all
costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the
exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms,
conditions, or provisions hereof.
6.7. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the
laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of
laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto
agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in
Orange County, California.
6.8. Assign e_nt: Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign,
transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of Consultant's interest in this Agreement without
City's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance
shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this
Agreement. Regardless of City's consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of
Consultant's obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder
for the term of this Agreement.
PSA 11
6.9.. Indemnification and Hold Harmless Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold
free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, at Consultant's
sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings
brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees arising out of the
performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the work
undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall
apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its
employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action,
complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of the
Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action,
complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and
employees based upon the work performed by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized
subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Consultant, its employees, and/or
authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or
indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole active
negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other
indemnity provisions contained either in the City's specifications or Consultant's Proposal,
which shall be of no force and effect.
6.10. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an
independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur
any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent.
Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time,
or in any manner, represent that it or any of its or employees are in any manner agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all
payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation,
Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers,
agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the
services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any
and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the
independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to
indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable
worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees
due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of
Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under
this paragraph.
6.11. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee,
agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement
System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant
shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or
employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or
subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions,
which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.
PSA 11
- P � --
Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or
ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors
providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby
agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City,
including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement
to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions
for PERS benefits.
6.12. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to
Consultant's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render
any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require.
6.13. Ownership of Documents. All findings, reports, documents, information and data
including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, files and tapes furnished or prepared by
Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be
and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information
shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City.
Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use
of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure
to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages,
losses, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from City's use of such
documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete
documents furnished by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports,
documents, information, data, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs,
files audio tapes or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized
representative, at no additional cost to the City.
6.14. Public Records Act Disclosure: Consultant has been advised and is aware that all
reports, documents, information and data including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or
files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, and provided to City may
be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California
Government Code Section 6250 et. seq.). Exceptions to public disclosure may be those
documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the California
Government Code Section 6254.7, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret.
The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is
designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the
disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure
is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.
6.15. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California
applicable to Consultant's services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the
Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seQ.) and Government Code Section
1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform
work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that
would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or subconsultants to
PSA 11
abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute.
6.16. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results
under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation
as may be required by the City's representative, regarding any services rendered under this
Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to
Consultant occurs, then Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design
drawings, estimates and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct
the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard
to the correction.
6.17. Prohibited Emplo3ment. Consultant will not employ any regular employee of
City while this Agreement is in effect.
6.18. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any
of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent
this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be
deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by
reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced.
6.19. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and
negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as
expressly provided herein.
6.20. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole
benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental
beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this
Agreement.
6.21. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement
are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or
accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
6.22. Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting
of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with
respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties
and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof
favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this
Agreement.
6.23. Amendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective
successors and assigns may amend this Agreement.
6.24. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or
compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a
waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of
1n _ PSA 11
this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative
of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy
in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in
respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
6.25. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the
offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of
this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party, is materially
impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent
jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good
faith negotiations.
6.26. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall
constitute one agreement.
6.27. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the
parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said
parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHERF,0F, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by
and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Date:
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
Date:
CEO of Costa Mesa
CONSULTANT
Date: 6 /05/2 -01 2
Signature
Dr �k a rk - v C)tt. k- V t C. P- MC- S,O 6 ti r -
Name and Title
PSA 13
Social Security or Taxpayer ID Number
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Project M er
ATTEST:
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
Of the City of Costa Mesa
Date:
Date:
Date: 6,—,9
�2r
Date:
L q l` PSA 11
CITE' COUNCIL POLIO' 100-5
SUBJECT
POLICY
EFFECTIVE
PAGE
NUMBER
DATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
1 of 3
BACK(JROUND
Under the Federal Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, passed as part of omnibus drug legislation
enacted November 18, 1988, contractors and grantees of Federal funds must certify that they will
provide drug-free workplaces. At the present time, the City of Costa Mesa, as a sub -grantee of
Federal funds under a variety of programs, is required to abide by this Act. The City Council has
expressed its support of the national effort to eradicate drug abuse through the creation of a
Substance Abuse Committee, institution of a City-wide D.A.R.E. program in all local schools
and other activities in support of a drug-free community. This policy is intended to extend that
effort to contractors and grantees of the City of Costa Mesa in the elimination of dangerous drugs
in the workplace.
PURPOSE
It is the purpose of this Policy to:
1. Clearly state the City of Costa Mesa's commitment to a drug-free society.
2. Set forth guidelines to ensure that public, private, and nonprofit organizations receiving
funds from the City of Costa Mesa share the commitment to a drug-free workplace.
1111E [y'1
The CEO, under direction by the City Council, shall take the necessary steps to see that the
following provisions are included in all contracts and agreements entered into by the City of
Costa Mesa involving the disbursement of funds.
1. Contractor or Sub -grantee hereby certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in
Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's workplace, specifically the job site or location
included in this contract, and specifying the actions that will be taken against the
employees for violation of such prohibition;
49 PSA 11
SUBJECT
POLICY
EFFECTIVE
PAGE
NUMBER
DATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
2 of 3
o. rsiawismng a yrug-Tree Awareness Program to mtorm employees about:
1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
2. Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs;
and
4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations
occurring in the workplace;
-c. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the
contract be given a copy of the statement required by subparagraph A;
d. Notifying the employee in the statement required by subparagraph 1 A that, as a
condition of employment under the contract, the employee will:
1. Abide by the terms of the statement; and
2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation
occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction;
e. Notifying the City of Costa Mesa within ten (10) days after receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 from an employee or otherwise receiving the actual notice of
such conviction;
f. Taking one of the following actions within thirty (30) days of receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 with respect to an employee who is so convicted:
1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and
including termination; or
2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local
health agency, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
1qq - PSA 11
SUBJECT
POLICY
EFFECTIVE
PAGE
NUMBER
DAVE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
3 of 3
g. Making a good faith effort to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation
of subparagraphs 1 A through I F, inclusive.
2. Contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be deemed to be in violation of this Policy if the City
of Costa Mesa determines that:
a. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has made a false certification under paragraph 1
above;
b. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has violated the certification by failing to carry out
the requirements of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 G above;
c. Such number of employees of Contractor and/or sub -grantee have been convicted
of violations of criminal drug statutes for violations occurring in the workplace as
to indicate that the contractor and/or sub -grantee has failed to make a good faith
effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
3. Should any contractor and/or sub -grantee be deemed to be in violation of this Policy
pursuant to the provisions of 2 A, B, and C, a suspension, termination or debarment
proceeding subject to applicable Federal, State, and local laws shall be conducted. Upon
issuance of any final decision under this section requiring debarment of a contractor
and/or sub -grantee, the contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be ineligible for award of any
contract, agreement or grant from the City of Costa Mesa for a period specified in the
decision, not to exceed five (5) years. Upon issuance of any final decision
recommending against debarment of the contractor and/or sub -grantee, the contractor
and/or sub -grantee shall be eligible for compensation as provided by law.
/CSG PSA
-2-00-
PSA 11
EXHIBIT A
._2oi-
PROPOSAL TO THE
PREPARED By
CSG Consultants, Inc®
May 3, 2032
801 Park Center Drive I Suite 230 1 Santa Ana, CA 92705
Phone (714) 568-1010 j Fax (714) 568-1028 1 www.csgwebsite.com
San Mateo ® Santa Ana + Salinas a Sacramento o Pleasanton
-203—
Letter of Introduction
f: f.
CompanyOverview........................................................... .I
FirmSummary"........................................................................ 1
InsuranceCoverage.................................................................... 2
KeyBenefits... — ......................................... ......................... — 3
E
Scopeof Work .................................................................. 4
Building Plan Review Services......................................................... 4
Building Inspection Services.......................................................... .
Grading/improvement Plan Review and Inspections ................................. .
Fire Department Plan Review and Inspections of Fire Protection Systems ........... 13
Permit Processing/Frout Counter Support ............................................ 15
Code Enforcement ........ ............. ............................................. .. 16
Staffing Qualifications. ................. . .................. 17
Technical Capabilities and General Experience ....................................... 17
Project Management and Team Interaction. . ............ ...................... . . . . 18
Relevant Project Experience & References ....................... 19
References.... ................................................................. 21
ProposedRates................................................................
Additional Information .................. ...................23
MFA
f & �
Professional Resumes.." --" ............................................""...24
—2(A —
May 3, 2012
City of Costa Mesa
Building Safety
Attn: Keith Clarke—Building Official
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
€£e: Proposal to Provide Building Plan Check and Inspection Services
Thank you for allowing CSG Consultants the opportunity to present this proposal. Our proposed staff will
be utilized in response to the scope of services as requested. All proposed CSG staff are fully registered,
ICC certified, with additional qualifications including LEED, DSA, and CASp experience and certification.
We offer an exceptional team for Fire Prevention services with a broad background in plan review and
inspection needs for jurisdictions as well as qualified grading improvement plan review and inspection
personnel.
^* We currently furnish as -needed services to the City of Costa Mesa and are thoroughly familiar with the
needs and requirements of the jurisdiction. We can easily be available for meetings at the City Hall when
requested and can provide Accelerated Building Plan Review services when needed.
Since 1991, CSG Consultants has been providing building and life safety services to jurisdictions
throughout the state. We currently furnish Building and Safety Services to over 70 clients; including
many neighboring communities. I will personally oversee all services to be provided.
Our local (principal) office and contact information is as follows:
Khoa Duong, P.E. I Vice President Building & Fire Life Safety
801 Park Center Drive Suite 230 1 Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 568-1010 Phone j (714) 872-6123 Cell
khoa@csgengr.com
Please feel free to contact myself or Mr. Cyrus Kianpour, President, with any questions or comments you
may have regarding our proposal.
Sincerely,
Khoa Duong, P.E.
Vice President, Building & Fire Life Safety
801 Park Center Drive I Suite 230 1 Santa Ana, CA 92705
` a s phone (714) 568-1010 1 fax (714) 568-1028 1 www.csgwebsite.com
2
Firm Summary
CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) is a California company with our Santa Ana office within convenient travel to
City offices. Additional support is available from our other offices in Salinas, San Mateo, Pleasanton, and
Sacramento. Founded in 1991, we provide a wide range of municipal services to community
development and public works departments, including fire protection plan review and inspection. The
majority of the 140+ individuals within our firm have provided public agency services throughout their
entire career. Our talented personnel bring a wealth of ideas and experiences having held similar
positions with communities dealing with the same development issues as the City of Costa Mesa.
Our staff consists of building officials, plan reviewers, inspectors, and specialized planning, grading
improvement plan reviewers and inspectors, Fire department plan reviewers and inspectors,
information technology, program and project managers, engineers, construction managers, and
sustainability professionals. Depending upon the needs of our clients, we can serve in either a project
specific or on-call staff augmentation capacity. The following represents a brief summary of our firm:
NAME OF FIRM: CSG Consultants, Inc.
PROJECT MANAGER: Khoa Duong, P.E. I vice President, Building & Fire Life Safety
LOCAL OFFICE: 801 Park Center Drive Suite 230
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 568-1010 Phone I (714) 872-6123 Cell
khoa@csgengr.com
CORPORATE OFFICE: 1700 South Amphlett Boulevard 13rd Floor
San Mateo, CA 94402
(650) 522-2500 phone
(650)522-2599 fax
www.csgwebsite.com
info@csgengr.com
SATELLITE OFFICES: 1257 Quarry Lane I Pleasanton, CA 94566
21 West Alisal Street I Suite 108 1 Salinas, CA 93901
225 Eighth Street I Suite 425 1 Sacramento, CA 95814
YEARS IN BUSINESS: 21
ORGANIZATION: Richard Mao I Founder
Cyrus Kianpour I President
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: 140+
TYPE OF BUSINESS: Corporation I Federal ID No.: 91-2053749
Our services and project experience includes the following areas of expertise:
Building i Fire & life Safety
Plan Review
Building Inspection
Municipal Code Enforcement
Building Department Management
Electronic Plan Check
Structural Engineering Services
Fire Life Safety
ADA Compliance
CASp
Environmental & Sustainable Programs
Const motion Mampinent
Program and Project Management
Contract Administration
Caltrans RE Services
Inspection / Oversight
Constructability and Bid Reviews
Scheduling and Claims Management
Project Estimating
Engineering / Public Woft
Development Review
Staff Augmentation / Municipal Services
Design & Preparation of PS&E
Pavement Management (MTC Certified)
Preparing & Monitoring Federal, State, and Local Grant
Applications and Reimbursements
Land Surveying & Mapping
Civil Plan & Map Review
GIS/Document Management
Planniing 1 Econornk Develapnwnt
Land Use Policy
Zoning Regulations
Design Review
Historic Preservation
Contract Planning
CEClA Compliance
Digital Plan Review
GIS
Scanning
Permitting Software
Insurance Coverage
CSG is a fully insured company. In addition to the required State Worker's Compensation Insurance, CSG
has a comprehensive automobile policy in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000); coverage in
the amounts of two million dollars ($2,000,000) for general liability; and one million dollars ($1,000,000)
for professional errors and omissions. CSG will guarantees insurance for professional errors and
�,. omissions will be maintained throughout the term of the contract and for three years following contract
termination. A certificate of insurance naming the City as insured will be issued upon award of contract.
Coverage Limits of liability
,., WORKERS COMPENSATION: Statutory
N C081kMERCL4L GENERAL UASIUTY: $1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Personal Injury:
$1,000,000 each occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY: Bodily Injury:
$.500,000 per person
t $1,000,000 per accident
Property Damage:
$100,000 per occurrence
h
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY: $1,000,000 per claim
' (Errors and Omissions)
t
� 1
I
20-7
�u
Key Benefits
CSG employs a team of professionally licensed plan review engineers, certified building officials, plan
reviewers, inspectors and permit technicians to manage building department operations, support front
counter procedures, review all plans, and inspect structures for code conformance. Our longtime
experience in furnishing comprehensive building and fire life safety services to jurisdictions provides a
consistent, strong technical foundation to all projects—from cutting edge digital plan review to
providing faster -than -scheduled turnaround times and assisting in last minute inspection requests, CSG
will deliver quality services to the City of Costa Mesa.
CSG proposes the following key objectives:
P Accomplished customer service. We dearly understand the importance of our role in the success
of your City and commit to providing your citizens and business partners—residents, architects,
engineers, developers, contractors—as well as your City staff with the highest level service.
P Concentrated focus on cost -savings approach and methods. Because we proudly serve many
municipalities and agencies, we are constantly improving and adapting our services to save you
and your City precious dollars. We share a wealth of recommendations from our varied
experience with other communities and clients to help keep your budget healthy and on track.
® Customized, responsive services. We are skilled at assessing time commitments, developing an
accurate work plan and applying dedicated, professional personnel. We can quicklyfine-tune
staff or staffing levels to match or adjust to changes in plan review, inspection and front counter
activity always maintaining the highest level of customer service. We hand pick staff uniquely
qualified and experienced to deliver the exact services requested.
® Fully committed and qualified personnel. Each member of our staff are fully licensed and
certified at the highest level of industry standards. To keep our personnel on the industry's
cutting edge, many serve as popular educational instructors and lecturers as well as sit on
leading boards and committees for organizations developing and implementing important code
regulations. We also keep up with latest in procedures and use of products, i.e. green building,
ADA accessibility, CASA certification requirements, and more.
P Shift turnarounds and expedited services. With longtime experience in the digital plan review
process, ourstaff excels at the speediest turnarounds in the industry. We easily match and more
often beat any required timing and make available our scanned plan review documents free to
our clients. We maintain a long list of available, qualified candidates for plan review, inspection
and front counter support and can quickly respond to multi-level needs.
® Leading-edge technology with cost-saving solutions. CSG delivers a suite of digital options for
jurisdictions speedy digital plan reviews including electronic versions of plan comments as well
as a final set of scanned plans; an optional, easy-to-use online web application/portal for
submittal, tracking and approval of digital plans; and, full scanning and archival services.
eN
Building Plan Review Services
CSG's professional engineers and plans examiners have all of the necessary licensing and certifications
to provide building plan check services. With regard to CSG's conflict of interest
policy, we have made the conscious decision to contract solely with public agencies
and do not provide private design services on any projects within the City of Costa
Mesa, thus eliminating any concern regarding conflict of interest. CSG acts at all
times as agents of the agencies we serve, providing responsive customer service to
all clientele. CSG is committed to putting the interests and needs of the City first
and foremost.
Compliance Standards
Our team of professionals is ready to assist in all aspects of plan review and focus on the special needs
and requirements of each of our clients. We promise prompt turnaround times and offer comprehensive
online status reports. Our plan checkers carefully review all documents for compliance with building
codes, fire codes, energy conservation standards, State accessibility regulations, and all local ordinances.
We understand and will comply with the City's requirements for plan review services. Our engineers and
plan reviewers review plans for compliance with all policy and model codes adopted by the State,
including but not limited to:
® 2010 California Building Code, Volumes 1 and 2 as adopted by the State of California
® 2010 California Residential Code
0 2010 California Electrical Code as adopted by the State of California
® 2010 California Plumbing Code as adopted by the State of California
® 2010 California Mechanical Code as adopted by the State of California
P 2010 California Fire Code as jointly published by the Western Fire Chiefs Association and the
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) as amended and adopted by the State of California
(Title -24, Part 9 California Fre Code)
0 National Fire Codes as published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA); as adopted
and referenced by the State of California (California Code of Regulations, Title -19, Section 1.09)
P 2010 State Historical Building Code
P 2008/2010 California Energy Code
® 2010 California Green Building Code
P NPDES/WQMP/SWPPP Compliance
City adopted ordinances and amendments relative to building and municipal codes, including
project Conditions of Approval from other City departments, divisions, regulating agencies, and
jurisdictions
Plan Check Comments
All pian check comments will be formatted to the City's established correction list templates. Any
additional forms established by the City for alternative methods of construction and/or deviations from
requirements, such as disabled access, will be incorporated into the correction comments and returned
completed with the appropriate recommendations. In addition, Internet access is available for
transferring plan check comments. This will enable City staff to immediately modify our checklist for
incorporation with other department comments.
rf
OSHP63 Reviews
our staff of professional engineers, architects, and certified plans examiners is experienced with and
have successfully completed many OSHPD3 plan reviews for multiple client agencies.
Green Building and LE€D Certifications
CSG Consultants has all the qualifications necessary to assist the City in both the
development of policy and the implementation of green and sustainable building
practices. The Environmental and Sustainable Program division of CSG can assist on
demolition and recycling as well as public outreach involved in the building industry.
We have Certified Green Building Professionals (CGRP) and LEED accredited
personnel on staff. Building Division staff is experienced in plan review and
inspection for compliance with CalGreen and local green building ordinances.
Third Party Plan Review
If requested by the City, CSG will provide third -party plan reviews. The applicant can provide payment
directly to CSG for plan review fees incurred by CSG. We will be responsible for the collection of any of
third -party fees.
CASA Services
We understand California Building Departments are required to have a CASp certified person in place
and available for technical questions and interpretations. Our CASp certified staff are knowledgeable of
state and federal accessibility laws and regulations and possesses the expertise necessary to promote
access to facilities for persons with disabilities. In accordance with newly -formed rules and regulations
we can supply a CASp certified professional to review all plans for accessibility and will comply with
regulations to provide a sufficient number of building department staff who are CASP certified by
January 1, 2014.
race Hours And Meeting Availability
CSG staff is available for applicant inquiries or conferences anytime during regular business hours
without charge via telephone; 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. We can easily alter our
W hours to meet the City's needs. Evenings and weekends for special events and meetings can be
accommodated with 24 hours notice. For your convenience, we can also meet with City staff, architects
and applicants. We recognize the value of pre -design consultation with prospective applicants and are
available to provide this service as well. Our Project Manager will be available in person for consultation
and meetings with a reasonable lead time.
Response to City Questions or Requests
CSG staff can typically respond to the City for all questions or requests generated during field inspection
on any plan review during the same day, but no longer than the following day a request is received.
Plans Pickup and Delivery
We coordinate the pickup and return of all plans to via CSG staff or a licensed courier service. This
service is provided at no additional cost.
-2-0--
Online Plan Check Status
CSG offers a convenient service allowing clients to check plan review status and comments online. By
logging on to our website, clicking on Plan Check Status, and entering a password, staff as well as
authorized applicants, can view each project document and communicate with the plan checker via e-
mail or post -a -note. With a password, staff or authorized applicants can download comments from the
web upon completion of the plan review. There is no additional cost for this service.
Plash Review Timelines and Availability
We work hard to provide the best quality, and most timely service in the industry. We pride ourselves in
3
maintaining our requested plan review turnaround times—even delivering feaster than our own
deadlines—for our clients. Our goal is to approve code -complying projects and to successfully and
quickly move work through jurisdiction processes. Our typical turnaround is as follows:
if a review is anticipated to take longer than the maximum turnaround timing, we will notify the City
representative for negotiation as to additional time required to ensure an appropriate level of review.
Accelerated Plass Check
CSG completes initial accelerated plan check in fewer than 5 working days. Rechecks are completed in
less time. At your request, we can perform plan check services within an accelerated time frame;
negotiated on behalf of the applicant, the City, and CSG. The fee is also negotiated on behalf of the
applicant, the City, and CSG.
Digital Plan Review
CSG began the transition to digital plan review over 6 years ago, leading the consultant field with this
ground -breaking service. All paper plans submitted to CSG are immediately scanned into digital files and
stored on our servers for speedy access to both our clients and our plan reviewers. Plan reviews are
performed with no disruption to the workflow using a dual monitor system. Our plan reviewers furnish
electronic versions of their plan comments conforming to each client's formatted templates. A
signifdceant benefit to this ,process is clients are presented upon final approval, a set of digitally scanned
playas at no cost—thus saying a rcaluable}urisdia:iion dollars and providing "green" and paperless,
convenient storage of all construction -related documents.
For several jurisdictions requesting a pure digital plan review workflow, we have developed an online
web application for an applicant to submit their digital files directly to us; including an online portal for
the applicant/jurisdiction to retrieve their comments and submitted digital files with redlines. This
online portal tracks all submittals, including re -submittals until the plans have been approved. Projects
submitted digitally are processed through an easy-to-use web portal which can be customized to suit
the needs of a jurisdiction.
—2-11—
io 3
`< Residential Adclitions
lent ImpmVemenv.
Commerdal New Construction
10 5
�omrh�ri ddid
5
.,� Small Commercial Remodels /tenant improvements
10 5
F29aSPt�f�Jzx€ ib'fE�z
S
if a review is anticipated to take longer than the maximum turnaround timing, we will notify the City
representative for negotiation as to additional time required to ensure an appropriate level of review.
Accelerated Plass Check
CSG completes initial accelerated plan check in fewer than 5 working days. Rechecks are completed in
less time. At your request, we can perform plan check services within an accelerated time frame;
negotiated on behalf of the applicant, the City, and CSG. The fee is also negotiated on behalf of the
applicant, the City, and CSG.
Digital Plan Review
CSG began the transition to digital plan review over 6 years ago, leading the consultant field with this
ground -breaking service. All paper plans submitted to CSG are immediately scanned into digital files and
stored on our servers for speedy access to both our clients and our plan reviewers. Plan reviews are
performed with no disruption to the workflow using a dual monitor system. Our plan reviewers furnish
electronic versions of their plan comments conforming to each client's formatted templates. A
signifdceant benefit to this ,process is clients are presented upon final approval, a set of digitally scanned
playas at no cost—thus saying a rcaluable}urisdia:iion dollars and providing "green" and paperless,
convenient storage of all construction -related documents.
For several jurisdictions requesting a pure digital plan review workflow, we have developed an online
web application for an applicant to submit their digital files directly to us; including an online portal for
the applicant/jurisdiction to retrieve their comments and submitted digital files with redlines. This
online portal tracks all submittals, including re -submittals until the plans have been approved. Projects
submitted digitally are processed through an easy-to-use web portal which can be customized to suit
the needs of a jurisdiction.
—2-11—
3
a
Quality Control 1 Quality Assurance
CSG's in-house quality assurance / quality control program utilizes a peer review process with multi-level
internal plan checking and project management. A Senior Plan Check Engineer directly associated with
the project is supported by technical staff in the review process to ensure consistency between
observations and field data. The Project Manager (not directly involved with the project) will review the
preliminary report to ensure compliance with our internal quality control standards. CSG currently
N works in the City of Costa Mesa and is familiar with the city's needs and procedures.
., J�1
v.t
Building Inspection Services
CSG's ICC certified inspection staff possesses the necessary building industry experience to provide on-
call building inspection services. The following is our summary of qualifications to provide the requested
services.
Selection and Standards
CSG selects qualified, certified candidates for inspection services for review and
approval. We offer fully integrated, multi -disciplined building and fire inspection
x>' services for residential, commercial, and industrial projects, and are experienced
in all construction types. In addition, we utilize combination inspection personnel
whenever possible to perform over-the-counter pian reviews or assist as customer
service back-up at the front counter in addition to regular inspection duties to
save jurisdictions valuable time and expenses. Our inspection staff easily
integrates into client organizations, consistently implementing policies and
procedures and remaining transparent to applicants and customers.
Our Project Manager will consult with the designated official on all discretionary decisions and/or
materials or types of construction, as well as ensuring all relevant regulatory agencies have approved
the project.
For purposes of consistent application and public relations, our inspectors research the policies and
special code interpretations. All inspections ensure compliance with current local and State building
codes and ordinances.
Continuing Certification and Training
We take pride in working with inspectors motivated to achieve the highest level of experience and
certification. We work hard to match your jurisdiction's level of safety and code compliance and
understand that personality and customer service is crucial to on-the-job success.
All CSG inspectors are ICC certified and are routinely updated through specialized training classes and
seminar attendance in approved and modern methods, materials, tools and safety used in buiilding
inspection, as well as the most current building standards.
Inspection Schedule
our building and/or special project related inspection services are provided as -needed and can be scaled
down or ramped up to fit any schedule preferable to the City. Personnel will be available for duty during
the City's regular business hours Monday to Friday, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; however we can also easily
alter our hours to fit any specific need the City might anticipate. Emergency inspections (usually
requests that pertain to a serious or urgent life/safety issue) can be provided as they are needed; nights,
weekends and holidays. All staff is familiar with a multitude of jurisdictional scheduling and tracking
systems and can quickly adapt to City requirements.
Inspection Notification Time
CSG will provide inspection staff in a timely manner. Notification time required to provide inspection
staff is typically 24 hours.
Tools and Equipment
CSG provides all vehicles, fuel, maintenance and other equipment necessary for inspectors to carry out
their duties.
CASp Inspection Services
CSG will provide a CASp certified person for inspection and technical questions and interpretations on
an as needed basis. CSG's CASp certified staff are available to provide on-site inspections of existing and
new facilities to assist jurisdictions on interpreting and applying state and federal accessibility standards.
Effective July 1, 2010, California building departments are required to have a CASA certified specialist in
place and available for accessibility questions. Additionally, the law requires that
by 2014, building departments employ CASp certified staff to review plans and
perform inspections in compliance with Senate Bill 1608 and the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). California Senate Bill 1608 sets up a process and establishes
procedures for accessibility specialists (CASp) who are authorized by the State of
California to inspect properties for accessibility compliance. The Bill adds several
provisions to existing laws regarding construction -related disability access issues.
Its primary goal is to protect the disabled public and businesses alike. Further, SB
1608 provides an opportunity for businesses to get information about accessibility from inspectors
certified by the State of California.
CSG's CASp Program assists public agencies by providing accessibility compliance services by certified
specialists. Our CASp specialists are certified by the State as experts in disability access laws. Our CASp
specialists will conduct inspections and make recommendations on improving accessibility. Upon
passing a CASp inspection, CSG will recommend the issuance of a Disability Access tnspection Certificate.
These certificates are sequential and are issued by the Division of the State Architect.
-
Third Party Inspections
If requested by the City, CSG will provide third -party inspections. The applicant can provide payment
u directly to CSG for inspection costs incurred by CSG. We will be responsible for the collection of any of
third -party fees.
T Grading/improvement Plan Review and Inspections
The scope of work will include review of grading and drainage plans, improvement plans, construction
and post -construction best management practices, final and parcel maps, and other plans as required.
Review of tentative maps and engineering support through the entitlement process can also be
- provided on an as -needed basis.
Additionally, site inspections for compliance with approved improvement plans and for compliance with
VIA
erosion control measures will be provided by our qualified staff.
CSG can readily provide plan or map check services for the following major project types:
P Major and Minor Residential Subdivisions P Parks & Recreational Areas
P Commercial Projects P Roadway Projects (New and Resurfacing)
® Multi -Use Projects P Utility Projects
A Single -Family Homes P ADA Compliance Projects
Our experienced staff regularly reviews the following types of plans, maps, and studies:
f ® Rough and Precise Grading Plans Ii Construction Details
Hydrology/Hydraulic Studies P Trak Signal Plans
` P Utility Plans & Profiles (Storm Drain, Sanitary P Demolition Plans
Sewer, Water, Electric, Gas) P Construction Cost Estimates
f Sewer Capacity Analyses (Engineer's Estimates/Probable Costs)
l� Subdivision Improvement Plans P Review of Tentative Maps and Preparation
(Roadways, Lots, Lighting, Joint Trench) of Conditions of Approval
., R Roadway Plans and Profiles 0 Final Maps & Parcel Maps
(including Signage and Striping) A Plats and Legal Descriptions for Lot line
*'`Sediment and Erosion Control Plans Adjustments, Lot Mergers, and Easement or
® Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans Right -of -Way Dedications/Abandonment
(SWPPPs)
Our staff is trained and experienced in the following:
R NPDES Compliance, Specialized in P State General Construction Permit
Provision C.3 Compliance (QSD's/QSP's on staff)
P Hydromanagement (HM) Ii Caltrans Standard Specifications and
� P Construction Site Compliance for Standard Plons
Water Quality Protection
0 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices .9 Subdivision Maps Act & Land Surveyor's
(MUTCD) Act Industry Standard
In addition to review of plans and maps according the list above, CSG has the necessary equipment and
staff to provide topographic surveys for City -owned properties and roadways, and can also prepare
parcel or final maps on the City's behalf.
CSG's construction management services include project oversight, contract administration and
direction during construction, review of submittals, coordination and processing of Requests for
Information (RFIs), review and assistance in negotiating change orders, maintenance of project
schedules, Meld inspections and review of monthly progress payments to the contractor. Our inspectors
are experienced in all types of public works and development projects such as: water and sewer systems
including recycled water systems, pump stations, storm drainage, roadway work, grading, paving, traffic
signals and public buildings, including police and fire stations, community and senior centers, libraries,
and other municipal buildings. They provide onsite construction inspection of all phases of the
construction and supervision of: materials sampling, testing and field survey work, as well as reviewing
onsite safety, traffic control, and public safety. CSG has provided Construction Management and
Inspection Services for many development projects as well as inspected all phases of developments
including water and sewer joint utilities, grading, drainage work, electrical lighting, concrete and asphalt
concrete work.
Review Process
New submittals will be coordinated with Sophie Truong, the proposed project manager. At the time of
new submittals, the applicant may decide to meet with the City and Ms. Truong to briefly present the
project and discuss any design challenges. At that time, CSG will perform a cursory review and let the
applicant know if additional documents are needed for the review.
-� Plan reviews may be conducted either at one of CSG's facilities or on-site at City offices. Typical and
"Expedited" turnaround times for each review will be as described below:
EOED TED
Improvement/Grading Plans 10 days 10 days 10 days 5 days
Fwalawact Maps
Parcel Maps 10 days 2-5 days 5 days 2:3 days
days 2i>es Sys s
F Once the plan check has been completed, the applicant may decide to meet with the reviewing party to
discuss the comments. Meetings with applicants and City staff may be conducted at CSG's offices or at
on-site at City's offices. CSG will be readily available to meet with developers and engineers to discuss
any concerns they may have at any stage during the review process.
For Final or Parcel Maps, we will perform the functions of Deputy City Engineer and Deputy City
Surveyor and complete the following:
® Review for compliance with the approved Tentative Maps and Conditions of Approval
® Review for compliance with the Subdivision Map Act
R Review for compliance with the Land Surveyor's Act
® Review of closure calculations
Y P Review of Utle information far property, including existing easement based on information
provided in the preliminary title report
0 Review of record documents (maps, deeds, etc.)
R Review Development Agreement, Disposition and Development Agreement
P Review of Precise Improvements Plons for compliance with Final/Parcel Map
0 Review of other relevant documents/approvals for the subdivision
P Sign mylar prints of the approved maps as City Engineer and City Surveyor.
—2I(0—
For Improvement Plans, we will perform the functions of Deputy City Engineer and review the plans and
supporting documents for compliance with the following:
Geotechnical recommendations
` 0 Hydrology/hydraulic studies
P Municipal Code, City Design Guidelines and Standards, or other City procedures and policies
0 Community Plans (Specific Plan, General Plan)
,P Caltrans Standards
P CEQA & other environmental documents
P Development Agreement & Disposition and Development Agreement
P Final/Parcel Mop & Subdivision Mop Act
e National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits
Other regional agency requirements as they relate to infrastructure needs
P ADA compliance
P Traffic studies, parking issues
p Industry Standards
Online Plan Review Tracking
CSG offers a convenient service allowing clients to check plan review status and comments online. By
logging on to our website, clicking on Plan Check Status, and entering a password, staff as well as
authorized applicants, can view each project document and communicate with the plan checker via e-
mail or post -a -note. With a password, staff or authorized applicants can download comments from the
web upon completion of the plan review. Where is no additional cost for this service.
Quality AssurancelQuality Control
CSG's in-house quality assurance/quality control program utilizes a peer review process with multi-level
internal plan checking and project management. As highlighted in the organizational chart shown within
this proposal, a Principal Engineer directly associated with the project supports experienced staff in the
review process to maintain consistency between projects. Our staff has the technical support, tools, and
technical expertise to review and coordinate various types of development reviews at the highest level.
r
Fire Department Plan Review and Inspections of Fire Protection Systems
Fire Plan Review
We furnish fire and life safety, special hazards, and fire sprinkler and fire alarm plan review for any and
all structures with emphasis on the unique needs and requirements of each of our clients. We are also
experienced in special hazards and risks associated with industrial and commercial buildings, single-
family and multi -family complexes. We promise thorough, accurate review with prompt turnaround
times and offer comprehensive online status reports.
Our review ensures compliance with all local ordinances, and State Codes and
Federal codes and standards related to Fire and Life Safety, including the
following:
r
0
0
2010 California Building Code, Volumes 1 and 2 as adopted by the
State of California
2010 California Residential Code
2010 California Mechanical Code as adopted by the State of California
2010 California Fire Code (as adopted by the State of California)
National Fire Codes as published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA); as adopted
and referenced by the State of California
City adopted ordinances and amendments relative to building and municipal codes, including
project Conditions of Approval from other City departments, divisions, regulating agencies, and
jurisdictions
PROJECT TIMELINES
Our typical turnaround is as follows:
New Commercial or ResWential Complexes
S
3
wow:Campus Wis #u ais"
New Fire Sprinkler System
5
3
-1 szo
New Fire Alarm System
5
3
_.... . .
. 'll
New Construction Fire and Life Safety Review.
5
3
6
Occupancies Using Reportable Quantifies of Hazardous Materials
5
3
Many projects are small in scope and plans can be reviewed on-site if in-house staff is utilized. At your
request, we have a team of additional professionals available for timely review on complex or sensitive
projects. if a review is anticipated to take longer than the maximum turnaround timing, we will notify
the City immediately to determine best alternatives.
5,;�
Fire Inspection Services
SELECTION AND STANDARDS
We offer fully integrated, multi -disciplined building and fire inspection services for residential,
commercial, and industrial projects, and are experienced in all construction types. Our certified
inspectors ensure compliance with applicable fire codes and requirements by identifying code violations,
offering solutions to developers, property owners and tenants on potential risks and safety hazards, and
by working as a team to correct violations. Our fire inspection staff easily integrates into client
organizations, consistently implementing policies and procedures and remaining transparent to
' applicants and customers.
For purposes of consistent application and public relations, our inspectors research the policies
and special code interpretations of the City. All inspections ensure compliance with current City
and State building codes and ordinances.
INSPECTIOIN SCHEDULE
Our building and/or special project related inspection services are provided as -needed. personnel are
typically available for duty from Monday to Friday, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; however we can easily alter
our hours to better fit the City's needs. Emergency inspections (usually requests that pertain to a serious
or urgent life/safety issue) can be provided as they are needed; nights, weekends and holidays. All staff
is familiar with a multitude of jurisdictional scheduling and tracking systems and can quickly adapt to
City requirements.
CONTINUING CERTIFICATION AND TRAINING
We take pride in working with inspectors motivated to achieve the highest level of experience and
certification. We work hard to match your jurisdiction's level of safety and code compliance and
understand that personality and customer service is crucial to on-the-job success. All CSG inspectors are
certified and are routinely updated through specialized training classes and seminar attendance in
approved and modern methods, materials, tools and safety used in building inspection, as well as the
most current building standards.
INSPECTION (NOTIFICATION TIME
CSG will work with the City to provide inspection staff in a timely manner. Notification time required to
provide inspection staff is typically 24 hours.
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT
CSG provides all vehicles, fuel maintenance and other equipment necessary for inspectors to carry out
duties.
2-1(1—
Permit Processing ! Front Counter Support
CSG has staff immediately available to provide Permit Technician services. As requested, the following is
our summary of qualifications to provide the requested services. Resumes for all proposed staff are
included in the Appendix of this proposal.
These first response services are vital to the success of the entire building and safety permit process as
they often set the tone for the applicant whether a homeowner, contractor, or architect. CSG handpicks
exceptionally qualified personnel with a central focus on operating as an extension of the City's team,
understanding the importance of exemplary customer service, knowledge on the inner -workings of
building departments, and are thoroughly familiar with the building application and permit process.
Our permit technicians are trained in a multitude of jurisdictional scheduling and tracking systems and
can quickly adapt to City requirements. Many of our staff are also dual -role employees and can serve as
both inspector(s) and front counter support. Personnel work collaboratively with applicants and have a
can do attitude to help resolve issues and find solutions for applicants. Qualified candidates with the
required experience will be presented for City approval. Personnel can provide the following, but are not
limited to:
i9 Welcome and receive customers at the public services counter
Provide public information regarding permit applications, plan review and inspection
requirements
P Answer questions quickly and correctly directly from the public, from phone calls and emails
P Receive, process and issue building permits and coordinate the plan review and inspection
process, including tracking, routing and storage of plans
0 identify and assist in the collection of all necessary fees for building permit applications, and
other building department services
Maintain filing systems necessaryfor tracking in -progress applications, permits issued, plan
checks in progress, approved plans and other appropriate
9 Develop reports required such as applications submitted, permits issued, inspection requests,
revenue, etc.
Create public informational documents, handouts explaining technical issues or requirements for
permit issuance
P Familiarity with various permit tracking software programs
Code Enforcement
Code enforcement activities are a crucial service to ensure not only public health
and safety but also to enhance economic development throughout the City.
Blighted conditions such as vacant lots, overgrown weeds, deteriorated building
exteriors, missing or broken windows and screens, foreclosures, and inoperable
vehicles all contribute to City deterioration. CSG can supply code enforcement
specialist to identify and work with property owners to correct code violations to
the exact specifications needed to satisfy the City. Codes and ordinances
enforced include:
D Zoning Codes
P Building Codes
P Housing
P Public !Nuisances
State Health & Safety Codes
P Other Issues Relating to Health, Safety, and Community Welfare
Typical services include preparing abatement cases for and testifying in public hearings and court
proceedings on behalf of the City; serving as a resource and providing information on the City of Costa
Mesa regulations to property owners, residents, businesses, the general public, and other City
departments and divisions.
i
CSG is well qualified to provide professional plan check and inspection services to the City of Costa Mesa
for Building, Grading Improvement and Fire Prevention services. All of our clients are exclusively public
agencies, thus eliminating any concern of conflict of interest. Each of our proposed staff members
possesses the necessary certification and training required for these services. Please refer to the
Technical Capabilities and Personnel Qualifications Table for more detailed information regarding our
proposed staff credentials. We have included a comprehensive list of clients and services provided
within the References Section of this proposal.
Our staff understands the development approval process because we have worked side-by-side with
local communities building and refining these very systems. CSG has carefully selected key professionals
and anticipated resources specific to this project. We offer professional engineers, highly qualified plan
examiners, fully certified inspectors as well as certified technicians with extensive experience. All
proposed personnel are highly skilled and experienced understanding the policies and procedures
necessary for streamlined services and superior customer care. Main staff profiles are included within
this proposal for your review_ Additional staff can be added when workload warrants. With each
additional staff member proposed, CSG will obtain prior approval from the City's designated manager.
CSG will not utilize the services of sub -consultants for this contract.
i Commitment to Excellence
We encourage staff to participate in and contribute to the many associations important to our industry.
CSG was recently honored as the California Building Official Association's (CALBO) Industry Leader of the
Year for service and dedication to the building and safety industry. Knowing technical excellence and
proficiency is vital to successful public service, attendance at update seminars, specialized training
classes, and continuing certification conferences are an integral part delivering the best in the business
to our clients. Many of our staff hold or have held key positions within the groups listed below as well as
- serve as in -demand instructors and trainers. We support community outreach whenever possible.
LEAGUE
&`'>:'"- OF CALIFORNIA
.CITIES
3
o League of California Cities
California Building Officials
i9 International Code Council
ICC Chapters of Sacramento Valley, East Bay, Peninsula,
Napa Solano, Yosemite, Monterey, Shasta Cascade, Los
Angeles Basin, Coachella, Orange Empire, Foothill
P County Building Officials of California
P California Fire Chiefs Association
P Northern Fire Prevention Officers
0 Southern Fire Prevention Officers
P American Public Works Association
® Institute of Transportation Engineers
P Structural Engineers Association of Northern California
9 Structural Engineers Association of Southern California
.reti
Project Management and Team interaction
Khoa Duong, PE, will serve as Project Manager for this contract and ensure adequate resources are
applied as well as oversight and quality control at all levels. Khoa has acted as the contract Building
Manager for many Southern California communities throughout his career.
PramM Personnel Qualifications
Khoa Duong, PE Professional Engineer, State of Catitornia Almn Pro)ed Management,
Project Managed Plan Certified Plans Examiner, ICC Certified 0840436 Building (Structural & Non -
Review Engineer Structural), 724 Energy,
Accessibility, Plumbing,
Mechanical, Electrical
SE, PE, CASA
Structural Plan Review
Engineer
Civil Engineer, State ofCa
CASA Specialist
C31833
272
BWdind g (Structured & Non -
Structural), T24 Energy,
Accessibility, Plumbing,
Mechanical, Elecffical, CASA
Plans Examiner
;=Gwrall, 1 /4 cMiyy,
Accessibility, Plumbing,
Mechanical, Electrical
41
bw acwwrb
t 81tj3
d
' Oe+rel drier ( Jt' ')
R 'P
Vance Cook
Building Inspector, ICC Certified
5003436
Combination Inspector
Combination Inspector, ICC Certified
5003436
Residential Combination Inspector, ICC Certified
5003436
Inspection
Commercial Plumbing Inspector, ICC Certified
5003436
CAIBO Disaster Worker
5003436
p=W �� F'ra Prevention 1A Fire Plo Review, inspection
Fire Prevention 18
Fire Prevention IC
I
........................... .
...................................
................................
.............................
..............................
`:,• / fir:
Relevant Project Experienceren
A brief sampling of our relevant experience is presented below.
The Anahe:slm Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (SIC) I ANAHEIM. CA
CSG performed fire and life safety and electrical reviews for the
Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) project;
a world-class development project in the City of Anaheim at 2626
Katella Road. ARTIC combines a transportation gateway and mixed-
use activity center on a 16 -acre site owned by the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the City of Anaheim.
Construction details include a 120 foot high clam shell-like, 2 -story
structure and interior mezzanine. The structure is connected to train
platforms by a bridge.
ARTIC will serve as a hub for Orange County and the region, where
freeways, mayor arterials, bus routes and Orange County's backbone rail system converge. ARTIC
services will include: OCTA bus, Anaheim Resort Transit, airport flyaway shuttles, taxi, and tour and
charter buses as well as accommodate future plans for the Anaheim Rapid Connection (ARC) and high-
speed trains.
City of Fulleiftn Police Department Facility I F U L L E R T O N, CA
The present Fullerton Police facility was originally dedicated as the City Hall in July,
1942. The building's balanced design, enclosing the sunken patio on two sides, is
complemented by fine detail work that is particularly apparent in the central corner
tower. The Police Department has occupied the building since construction of the
New City Hall in 1963.
Coordinated and provide building and structural plan check
P Provided on-call building inspection services
BBS$ Bny I TUSTIN, CA
R Provided on-going building plan review
Provided Building Inspection services
0 Reviewed plans for on- and off-site improvements
P Collaborated with the city toward the timely delivery of the
project
P Participated in hearings and presentations to City Council and
various neighborhood organizations
'� — 1
Richard Nixon Library I Y 0 R B A LINDA. CA
® Coordinated and provided building and structural plan
review throughout the project
0 Reviewed plans for on-site improvements
P Assisted the City in handling Architects, Structural Engineers,
and overall plan check comments
P Worked with staff and development team from the
beginning to ensure all questions pertaining to the structure
were addressed, thereby allowing construction to start on
time
P Participated in numerous hearings and presentations to City
Council and various neighborhood organizations
-22-S-
References
Our track record of success with our clients is outstanding and we encourage you to contact our
references with any questions or clarification you might require. We have provided representative
building services within the last year or longer for the following:
City of Fullerton
Kirk Warren
Building and Code Enforcement Manager
303 West Commonwealth Avenue
Fullerton, CA 92832
(714)738-6558
Building Plan Review and inspection Services
Ongoing - 21 years
City of Anaheim
Jon Traw, P.E.
Chief Building Official
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Anaheim, CA 92805
(714) 765.5153
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services
Ongoing — 4 ywrs
City of Orange
Gavial Khorram, P.E.
Building Official
300 East Chapman Ave.
Orange, CA 92866
(714)744-2222
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services
Ongoing –12 years
County of Orange
Hadi Tabatabaee, P.E., C.B.O.
County Building Official
300 N. Flower
PO Box 4048
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 667-8843)
Staff Augmentation, Engineering Plan Review Services
Ongoing - 7 years
City of Tustin
Y. Henry Huang, P.E., C.B.O.
Building Official
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 573-3130
Building Plan Review and Inspection Services
Ongoing - 8 years
City of La Habra
Reny Fewell
Chief Building Official
201 E. La Habra Blvd.
La Habra, CA 90631
(562) 905-9724
Building Plan Review and Inspection, Building Oficial,
Counter Technician, Staff Augmentation,
Engineering Plan Review Services
Ongoing –10 years
��(0—
"fes` s
Proposed Rates
CSG will mail an invoice at the beginning of every month for services rendered during the previous
month. We do not anticipate the use of sub -contractors for this project. CSG provides pick-up and
delivery of plans as no additional cost. CSG proposes the use of a percentage option based on plan
review fees collected by the City, or compensation utilizing hourly rates.
Percentage i Hourly Rate Schedule
CSG will mail an invoice at the beginning of every month for services rendered during the previous
month. Compensation can be based on hourly rates or on a percentage fee basis. Hourly fees are listed
as well as the requested proposed percentage fees:
Plan Review Services
Description Rates
'Fee includes initial review and 2 reviews, if necessary; additional reviews will incur hourly fees
Full Plan Check Services by Percentage ................................ 75% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees
Structural I Mechanical I Electrical I Plumbing
Plan Review by Percentage ....... .................................... 35% of thelZity's Collected Plan Review Fees
Chief Plan Check Engineer (Manager) ................. ............................................. $100 per hour
Plan Check Engineer............................................................................. $85 - 95 per hour
PlansExaminer...................................................................................... $75 per hour
Building Inspection Services
Chief of Inspection (Manager) ............. ......................................................... $80 per hour
Senior Building Inspector (Supervisor) ............ .................................................. $70 per hour
Combination Building Inspector ................... ................................................... $55 per hour
Building Official Services
Assistant Building Official........................................................................... $100 per hour
Permit Technician Services I Clerical Support
Permit Technician Supervisor/Manager..................................... . . ....................... $50 per hour
Permit Technician II................................................................................ $40 per hour
Permit Technician I (entry level) ................................................... . ................ $30 per hour
Office Supervisor/Manager......................................................... . ................ $30 per hour
OfficeAssistant 11.................................................................................... $30 per hour
Office Assistant .................................................................................... $30 per hour
CASA Services
CASA Consultation................................................................................... $85 per hour
CASpInspection..................................................................................... $55 per hour
Fire Prevention Services
FireMarshal........................................................................................ $95 per hour
Fire Plans Examiner ..... . ............................. 85% of the City's Collected Plan Review Fees/ $85 per hour
Fire Inspector....................................................................................... $55 per hour
Coale Enforcement Services
Chief of Code Enforcement (Manager).............................................................. $80 per hour
Sr. Code Enforcement Officer (Supervisor).......................................................... $70 per hour
Code Enforcement Officer........................................................................... $55 per hour
All hourly rates include overhead costs including, but not limited to, salaries, benefits, Workers Compensation Insurance, office
expenses, etc. Should the scope of work change or circumstances develop which necessitate special handling, we will notify the
City prior to proceeding_ Annual adjustments may be made by mutual agreement based upon current CPI.
is F�:`F�;
Addifional Information
Optional Contract Services
As a multi -discipline firm, CSG can provide additional consulting services in response to the City's needs
and requests. When additional staff is needed, our experienced professionals are ready at a moment's
notice. We will work side-by-side with existing staff to meet needs and budget requirements. We
currently augment staffing in many Building Departments, serving as building officials, inspectors, and
counter technicians during periods of transition or high level project flow. CSG can also furnish code
enforcement, geotechnical pian check, grading, subdivision map, and improvement review. We can
work full-time or part-time, on a long-term or temporary basis.
Electronic Plan Review
CSG has an excellent Information Technology team available to assist the City with any IT needs. Our
staff is extremely familiar with many municipal software applications. In addition, CSG has developed
GreenVue Fusion, an innovative web -based Electronic Permit System integrated with a Digital Plan
Review engine. Our product is a single source solution managing the full life cycle of any community
development project, big or small. CSG currently provides digital plan review services to a number of
jurisdictions within California. By allowing for the electronic management and delivery of all
documentation required for a project, it is possible the only piece of paper printed will be the final
Certificate of Occupancy. Our integrated, intelligent system includes the following key modules:
P Permit Generation and Management
P Pion Routing and Tracking
P Collaborative Digital Plan Reviewr
P f=ield inspection Management
P Code Enforcement Case Tracking
P Digital Archive
P Built -In Public Web Portal
GreenVue Fusion is backed by CSG's diverse team of highly experienced individuals with solid public
service backgrounds. We leverage the latest technologies to deliver a superior product. GreenVue
Fusion represents the next logical step in the evolution of permit systems.
Environmental and Sustainable Programs
The Environmental and Sustainable Programs Section can provide jurisdictions with program design,
development, and implementation in green building programs, sustainable City programs, waste
reduction programs, and climate change action plans. CSG can work with your staff to create a practical
and effective program with CSG staff providing guidelines, policies, resources, and implementation
assistance.
-41 Staff Profiles
- 2-2-(q -
KGA Q9 PE
Vice President, Southern California
Building and Fire Life Safety
�J
LICENSES / COMM S
Civil Engineer, State of California 143601
Plans Examiner I ICC 0840436-83
CEC Non Residential I NR05-94-5665
CEC Residential I RO5-05-5055
EDUCA110H
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering California Polytechnic State University, Pomona
Mr. Duong serves as CSG's Building and Life Safety Manager and perforans the key role of plan review
quality control. With more than twenty five years of experience in building plan review, including onsite
- plan check engineer services, Khoa ensures that CSG's clients receive the highest quality plan review
services. Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Duong worked in both the public and private sectors. His experience
includes the following:
P Vice President in charge of plan review for Berryman & Henigar, where he worked for ten years.
P Supervising plan review engineer for Wilidan, where he was responsible for the day-to-day
operations of the plan review section in the San Bemardino office and served as plan review
engineer for numerous cities and counties throughout Califomia and Nevada.
0 Plan review engineer with the City of San Diego Building Department
Mr. Duong's expertise includes review of complex commercial, industrial and residential structures for
compliance with applicable building codes and ordinances, engineering standards and specifications,
supplemental energy requirements, and ADA regulations_ The following reflects a portion of Khoa's
relevant experience:
Supervising Plan Check Engineer, Various California Cities. Khoa provided plan check oversight for
over 40 jurisdictions, including the Cites of San Bruno, South San Francisco, Pomona, Fontana, Simi
Valley, Mission Viejo, Garden Grove, Redondo Beach, Hermosa Beach, Buena Park, Santa Ana, Indian
Wells, Loma Linda, Ontario, Colton, and San Bernardino, as well as the Counties of San Bernardino, Los
- Angeles and San Diego. In addition, Khoa managed plan check engineers and oversaw the day -today
operations of the building department. He also served as engineer for plan check services, performing
paper and electronic structural plan check and non-structural MEP, energy, and ADA reviews for
commercial, industrial, and residential structures.
' Plan Check Engineer, Various California Cities. Khoa served as Plan Check Engineer for the Cities of
Turlock, Burlingame, Rancho Cordova, Chino, Murrieta, and Costa Mesa. Mr. Duong performed structural
plan check and non-structural MEP, energy, as well as ADA reviews for commercial, industrial, and
residential structures.
In -House Plan Check Engineer, Various California Cities. Khoa served as an In -House Plan Check
Engineer for the Cities of Orange, Fullerton, `lorba Linda, Tustin, Westminster, and La Habra, performing
structural plan check and non-structural MEP, energy, and ADA reviews. He interfaced with developers,
architects, and engineers_
-230-
T
0
o,
C
0
0
ct1
70
rn
PAUL ARMSTRONG, P, COG {
Senior Plan Review Engineer Building Official
LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES
Building Official 10002014 -CB
Professional Engineer, State of California 145464
EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering) California State university, Long Beach
Advanced Study, Fire Protection Engineering I University of California, Irvine
,>
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Secretariat: International Residential Code for 1 and 2 Family Dwellings (1997-2000)
Co -Secretariat: ICC
Performance Based Building Code
Secretariat: Intemational Zoning Code (1935-2000)
Secretariat: General Design, Administrative, Lateral Design, Fire and Life Safety and Fire Risk Code
Committees of ICBO (1992-1996)
Technical Editor: 1997 Uniform Codes and UBC Handbook
NIBS HHS Code Comparison Committee (1994)
FEMA Building Performance Review Team member (1993)
NIBS Flood Standards Comparison Committee (1992)
Coordinator, Pacific Rim Conference on Performance Based Codes
M` Various ASCE Standards committees
SEAOC Code Committee liaison
ASME A17.1 Code Coordinating Committee
ANSI Construction Standards Board
AWARDS
CALBO Instructor of the Year
Paul offers a strong background in plan review and code development from his longtime position with ICBOACC
starting as an engineer and ending as Vice President. Paul was the Building Official of EI Monte and "knows
code„ from many angles with 21 years experience in the building codes and standards community, including his
work with all the Uniform and International Codes, ASCE 7, ANSI Al 17.1, FHAct, ADA, CA Title 24 Accessibility
regulations, to name a few. At CSG Paul combines his wealth of knowledge, hard work, and excellent customer
services; tap into Paul for all code related issues including effective plan review and inspection solutions.
-aBI
77
In
91
0
M
ti
C
3
N
'T
0
La
M
9L•-
�
a
f,;:
x%
RITCHIET9 SE, PE9 CASA
Plan Review Engineer
LICENM CMRCATMNS
Structural Engineer, State of California SE2650
Civil Engineer, State of California I C31833
Certified Access Specialist I CASA -272
EDUCATION
M.S. Degree, Strixtural Engineering I Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
B.S. Degree, Civil Engineering I California Polytechnic State University, Pomona, CA
Mr. Kato is a Structural Engineer and Building Official for CSG Consultants, Inc. His extensive experience in
performing plan review on public, commercial, industrial, and residential structures provides CSGs clients with
premiere quality plan review services. His expertise includes structural design and pian review for compliance
with applicable UBC, UPC, UMC, NEC, Carrfomia amendments, accessibility, energy requirements, and state
handicapped regulations.
Prior to his employment with CSG, Mr. Kato was the Principal for Kato Engineering, where he performed
structural engineering consulting services for public and private clients. He was responsible for structural design
and structural plan reviewing for a full spectrum of building types and occupancies. His employment with the
City of Westminster provided him with extensive plan review experience. Mr. Kato reviewed pians for
compliance with all relevant state and local odes.
Subsequent to his work with the City of Westminster as a plan review engineer, Mr. Kato was commissioned by
the City to update the municipal code to correspond to current California code requirements.
°. Mr. Kato has performed plan review for the Westminster Town Hall and Police Station, Laguna Hills High
School, Chapman University, Whittier Christian High School, and the City of Orange, Main Public Library. His
extensive knowledge of public buildings and his commitment to timeliness and quality contribute greatly to each
jurisdiction he serves.
Mr. Kato was commissioned as full-time Building Official for the City of La Habra. Recommended by the City of
Orange, Mr_ Kato assisted the City of La Habra's Building Department during their period of transition,
supervising and managing plan review, inspection and counter staff, coordinating the various building
departments, and managing personnel issues. Additionally, Mr. Kato coordinated City and private projects with
the building, planning, engineering, and public works departments, worked to update the City's municipal code,
` and provide feedback to facilitate development of efficient departmental practices and procedures.
Mr. Kato has the expertise and broad experience necessary to effectively coordinate, foster, and help develop
�«
all aspects of a municipal building department.
TUNG LE, EIT
Plans Examiner
LICENSES / CEIMFICATIONS
Engineer -In -Training, State of California 1 122739
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (Structural Emphasis)
California Polytechnic State University, Pomona
Mr. Tong D. Le serves in the Plan Review Division at CSG's Southern California headquarters, located in
Santa Ana. He currently performs building plan reviews of complex commercial and residential structures
and reviews existing buildings for change of use or occupancy in compliance with California codes and
City ordinances. Mr. Le brings a strong work ethic and positive attitude, providing CSG's clients with the
highest quality plan review and customer service.
Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Le developed his skills in structural design during his internship at Van Dorpe
Chou & Associates, a structural engineering consultant firm. He performed structural design for single
family dwellings and residential complexes, as well as shop drawing reviews.
Mr. Le has also broadened and developed his level of experience through his internship as a staff
engineer at Leighton Group Inc., focusing on geotechnical engineering. His duties included obtaining soil
samples, conducting field investigations, formalizing boring logs, and preparing soil reports-
- 2--3,:A
-
ki
M
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
TRAINUdS
Califomia Subdivision Map Act Seminar
Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM)
Municipal Regional NPDES Permit Provision C_6 (Construction BMPs)
Ms. Truong has extensive experience in both the design and review of various types of projects at all
levels of development, from entitlement to final grading and improvement plans. Past projects have
included the preparation or review of tentative maps, final or parcel maps, and comprehensive
improvements plans for large, hillside and coastal residential subdivisions in both Southern and Northern
California, commercial and industrial projects in San Francisco Bay and the Los Angeles regions, and
various local public works projects such as bicycle paths, new roadway construction, roadway
rehabilitation, and utility projects. Some of Sophie's recent review projects include:
P Pack Ridge 63 lot Subdivision in Half Moon Bay
0 Redwood Gate 45 -lot Subdivision in Palo Alto
P The Oyster Point Redevelopment Project in South San Francisco
9 The Branciforte Creek 324ot Subdivision in Santa Cruz
0 Menlo College / Menlo School Redevelopment in Atherton
As part of her development review experience, Sophie manages incoming submittals, reviews plans and
prepares comments and redlines, and regularly meets with project applicants and City personnel to
review the project and discuss design issues. In addition, Ms. Truong has been effectively managing
CSG's Development Review team since 2008, not only providing quality assurance/quality control for in-
house reviews, but also providing training, mentoring and engineering support to the review team.
Ms. Truong is particularly adept at reviewing projects for compliance with the State's Subdivision Map Act
Local Ordinances, Project Conditions of Approval, NPDES permit requirements, CEQA mitigation
measures, Coastal Development Permit conditions of approval, and any other permits or regulations
enforced at the municipal, state, or federal level.
In addition to providing development review services, Sophie also provides on-going design and
surveying efforts as a project manager for Public Works projects. Some of Sophie's recent design
experience includes the Seymour Street Extension to Highway 1 and the Highway 1 Bicycle and
Pedestrian Trail in Half Moon Bay, the federally funded Serramonte Blvd Roadway Rehabilitation Project
in Colma, and the Spencer Dam Spillway Repair ad Tartan Trail Sanitary Sewer Relocation Project in the
Town of Hillsborough.
Prior to joining CSG, Ms. Truong pursued a career in geotechnical engineering where she acquired
valuable knowledge in the construction industry preparing engineering recommendations for various
types of foundations and supervising field and laboratory work. She followed her geotechnical experience
with two years as a consultant for the City of Los Angeles, establishing methods of repair and managing
construction of the City-wide sewer system damaged in the 1994 Northridge earthquake.
T
LA
0
rrD
0
La
m
VANCE COOK
Building Inspector
UVENSES / COMFICATNINS
Building Inspector I icc 3oamm-10 sss
Combination Inspector I icc 5oo343S.56
Residential Combination Inspector I tcc 5W3436 -R5
California Commercial Plumbing Inspector I icc 5=436-13
CALBO Disaster Worker Certified I sAp5om
UCATIGN
Fullerton Community College, Fullerton, CA ( Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, Title 24
Energy/Access Disabled Access I Fullerton, CA
Addison Career Institute, Uniform Building Code I Ontario, CA
Cerro Coso Community College, AA Degree j Ridgecrest, CA
Dale Carnegie: Human Relations / Speaking I Anaheim, CA
Mr. Cook is a Building Inspector who joined CSG with over ten years of professional experience, focusing on
building inspection and plan review. Among his many projects are commercial and residential building
inspections, chief swimming pool inspector for commercial and large estate for the City of Anaheim, contract
municipal building inspector for the cities of La Habra, Costa Mesa, and Tustin, permit technician services for
the County of Los Angeles, and structural surveys for the City of Los Angeles. Major projects include complete
inspections of renovated commercial structures, rated and non -rated single and community family residential
new construction, and assisting the cities of Costa Mesa and Tustin in implementing the 2005 energy code.
Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Cook performed building and safety inspection services for three years for a number of
independent developers, contractors, and the public.
He has a wide range of experience including: field inspection; U.B.C. application: electrical, mechanical and
plumbing code application; code enforcement; permit technician; commercial and residential inspection,
commercial inspection, fire safety and administration.
_ Z ,--
,r)
ggpaaaN SH (ELVEN)
V .F�!
Permit Technician
Building & Safety Permit Technician 1 & 2EDUCATION
�a
AutoCad I Irvine Valley College & Orange Coast College
Microsoft Office, Word, Excel, PowerPoint I Irvine Valley College
Adobe Acrobat, Enterprise 1 -JD Edwards and Quickbooks
Ms. Petrosian brings a full complement of experience and talent to any front counter environment. She is
extremely skilled at municipal environments, processes and procedures and understands the value of
exceptional customer service.
EXPEMENCE
City of Costa Mesa I Building and Safety Department & Transportations /Engineering Department
Intern/Volunteer
® Administrative duties, filing, word-processing, spreadsheets and data entry'
® Document archiving, tracking and updating reports
Permit technician duties; processing a variety of land use, building, plumbing, mechanical, reviewing
plans and devefopment applications for completeness, calculating fees, issuing permits and explaining
the review, process to front counter clients
Scanning, drafting, and desktop publishing
Engineering support related to the program area
PEP Investments I Irvine CA LAPINCO, Inc. I Glendale, CA
Mechanical Engineer/Cost Estimator
® HUD,s project based — Section 8 Housing Program
® Communications and interact with residents to ensure resident satisfaction
P Conduct showings for interested leasing prospects
0 Fling, expense reports and financial management
P Rent collections, bank deposits, financial statements
Monitor delinquencies
P Process purchase invoices and accounts payable
® Manage and monitor maintenance requests and maintenance crew to assure coordination
0 Site inspecciions to ensure work completion
V
IN
0
c
V!
3
Ln
0
0
CU
F EDUCATION
AutoCad I Irvine Valley College & Orange Coast College
Microsoft Office, Word, Excel, PowerPoint I Irvine Valley College
Adobe Acrobat, Enterprise 'I -JD Edwards and Quickbooks
Ms. Petrosian brings a full complement of experience and talent to any front counter environment. She is
extremely skilled at municipal environments, processes and procedures and understands the value of
exceptional customer service.
EUMIENCE
City of Costa Mesa j Building and Safety Department & Transportation /Engineering Department
Intern/Volunteer
9 AdministraWe duties, filing, worm -processing, spreadsheets and data entry'
® Document archiving, 6racking and updating reports
® Permit technician duties, processing a variety of land use, building, plumbing, mechanical, reviewing
plans and devetopment applications for completeness, calculating fees, issuing permits and explaining
the review process to front counter clients
® Scanning, drafting, and desktop publishing
Engineering support related to the program area
PEP Investments I Irvine CA LAPIINCO, Inc. I Glendale, CA
Mechanical Engineer/Cost Estimator
9 HUDs project based — Section 8 Housing Program
R Communications and interact with residents to ensure resident satisfaction
R Conduct showings for interested leasing prospects
D Filing, expense reports and financial management
D Rent collections, bank deposits, financial statements
w R Monitor delinquencies
0 Pnocess purchase invoices and accounts payable
® Manage and monitor maintenance requests and maintenance crew to assure coordination
i Site inspections to ensure work completion
4A
54
In
0
D
ro
0
C
N
m
ro
rn
0
N_
ATTACHMENT 7
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
CITY OF COSTA MESA
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of June, 2012 ("Effective
Date % by and between the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation ("City"), and
Interwest Consulting Group Inc., 15061 Springdale Street, Suite 206, Huntington Beach, Calif.
92649, a California corporation ("Consultant").
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent
contractor to Interwest Consulting Group Inc. as more fully described in Consultant's Proposal
attached as Exhibit "A"; and
B. WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise
contemplated within California Government Code, Section 37103, and holds all necessary
licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and
C. WHEREAS, City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described in
Exhibit "A" (the "Project") and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection
with the services to be performed; and
D. WHEREAS, no official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions
of California Government Code, Sections 1090-1092, in the subject matter of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT
I.I. Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide the professional services described in
Consultant's Proposal, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein
by this reference.
1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their respective fields
and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by
professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound
professional practices. It is understood that in the exercise of every aspect of its role, within the
scope of work, consultant will be representing the City of Costa Mesa, and all of its actions,
communications, or other work, during its employment, under this contract is under the direction
of the department. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may affect its
performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any .changes in any laws that may affect
Consultant's performance of this Agreement. ,
Consultant shall be solely and completely responsible for conditions of the job -site,
including safety of all persons and property during performance of the work, and the Consultant
shall fully comply with all State, Federal and other laws, rules, regulations, and orders relating to
the safety of the public and workers.
._..2-40 —
The right of the Engineer or the City's Representative to conduct construction review or
observation of the Consultant's performance shall not include review or observation of the
adequacy of the Consultant's safety measures in, on, or near the construction site.
Construction materials and equipment may only be stored in streets, roads, or sidewalk areas if
approved by the Engineer.
1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City. Consultant agrees to perform all the work to
the complete satisfaction of the City and within the hereinafter specified. Evaluations of the
work will be done by the City Clerk or her designee. If the quality of work is not satisfactory,
City in its discretion has the right to:
(a) Meet with Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the
matters of concern;
(b) Require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is
satisfactory; and/or
(c) Terminate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.
1.4. warranty. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this
Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws including,
but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and
safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers' compensation insurance and safety
in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from
and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every
nature and description including attorneys' fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered
against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which
may be incurred by reason of Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
1.5. Non-discrimination. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage
in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their
race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical handicap, medical condition, marital
status, sexual gender or sexual orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the
Government Code.
1.6. Non -Exclusive Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into
agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this
Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services
contemplated by this Agreement.
1.7. Dele ag tion and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set
forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written
consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ
other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant's sole cost
�j� _ PSA 1]
and expense.
1.8. Confidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have
access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and
employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other
information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement
are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization
by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall
be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this
Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
2.4. COMPENSATION AND BILLING
2.1. Compensation. As compensation for the provision of services outlined in Exhibit
"A" and in accordance with this agreement, Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee
schedule set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Consultant's
total compensation shall not exceed five hundred thirty six thousand, one hundred twenty Dollars
($536,120.00).
2.2. Additional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services
provided outside the scope of services specified in the Consultant's Proposal or in an amount
exceeding $536,120.00 unless the City or the Project Manager for this Project, prior to
Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is
specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or
additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable.
2.3. Method of Billing. Consultant may submit invoices to City supervisor for
approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be
based on the total of all Consultants' services which have been completed to City's sole
satisfaction as of the date the invoice is created. City shall pay Consultant's invoice within forty-
five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the
services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. Any
additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as
"Additional Services" and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where
applicable, on all invoices.
2.4. Records and Audits. Records of Consultant's services relating to this Agreement
shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be
made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient
times for a period of three (3) years from the Effective Date.
3.0. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1. Commencement and Completion of Work. The professional services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective
Date of this Agreement. Failure to commence work in a timely manner and/or diligently pursue
work to completion may be grounds for termination of this Agreement.
242- PSA 11
3.2. Excusable Delays. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of
performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts
shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, material shortages, compliance with
laws or regulations, riots, acts of war, or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a
party.
3.3 Liquidated Damages. In the event of inexcusable delays, for each consecutive
calendar day after the time specified in Section 4. 1, Consultant shall pay to the City or have
withheld from moneys due it, the daily sum of $100.00.
4.0. TERM AND TERMINATION
4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a
period of 12 months ending on June 30, 2013, unless previously terminated as provided herein or
as otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. This Agreement may be extended four (4)
additional one (1) year renewal periods upon mutual agreement of the City and the Consultant.
4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of
canceling, suspending or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated
by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing written notice to Consultant.
The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of
termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering
services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City.
4.3. Compensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for
reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including
the date of City's written notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be
prorated as to the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in
accordance with the fees set forth herein. In ascertaining the professional services actually
rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall
be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings,
and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the
City or in the possession of the Consultant.
4.4. Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents
prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to,
finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings,
maps and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination
notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific
written authorization from Consultant shall be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal
expense to Consultant.
•'� ' 1�i �7�iL
5.1. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain, maintain,• and
keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement all of the following minimum
scope of insurance coverages with an insurance company admitted to do business in California,
rated "A," Class X, or better in the most recent Best's Ivey Insurance Rating Guide, and
2Z, -:,2)PSA 11
approved by City:
(a) Commercial general liability, including premises -operations,
products/completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket
contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily
injury with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence. If such insurance
contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this
Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(b) Business automobile liability for owned vehicles, hired, and non -owned
vehicles, with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
(51,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence for bodily injury
and property damage.
(c) Workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California.
Consultant agrees to waive, and to obtain endorsements from its workers'
compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers'
compensation insurance policy against the City, its officers, agents,
employees, and volunteers arising from work performed by Consultant for
the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise
under their workers' compensation insurance policies.
(d) Professional errors and omissions ("E&O") liability insurance with policy
limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined
single limits, per occurrence and aggregate. Architects' and engineers'
coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If the policy is
written as a "claims made" policy, the retro date shall be prior to the start
of the contract work. Consultant shall obtain and maintain, said E&O
liability insurance during the life of this Agreement and for three years
after completion of the work hereunder.
5.2. Endorsements. The commercial general liability insurance policy and business
automobile liability policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a) Additional insureds: "The City of Costa Mesa and its elected and
appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are
additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with
the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises
owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; automobiles owned, leased,
hired, or borrowed by the Consultant.."
(b) Notice. "Said policy shall not terminate, be suspended, or voided, nor
shall it be cancelled, nor the coverage or limits reduced, until thirty (30)
days after written notice is given to City.
(c) Other insurance: "The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary
�
1A PSA 11
insurance as respects the City of Costa Mesa, its officers, officials, agents,
employees, and volunteers. Any other insurance maintained by the City of
Costa Mesa shall be excess and not contributing with the insurance
provided by this policy."
(d) Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City of Costa Mesa, its officers,
officials, agents, employees, and volunteers.
(e) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each .insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
5.3. Deductible or Self Insured Retention. If any of such policies provide for a deductible
or self-insured retention to provide such coverage, the amount of such deductible or self-insured
retention shall be approved in advance by City. No policy of insurance issued as to which the
City is an additional insured shall contain a provision which requires that no insured except the
named insured can satisfy any such deductible or self-insured retention.
5.4. Certificates of Insurance: Consultant shall provide to City certificates of
insurance showing the insurance coverages and required endorsements described above, in a
form and content approved by City, prior to performing any services under this Agreement.
5.5. Non -limiting: Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way,
the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which Consultant
may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.
6.0. GENERAL, PROVISIONS
6.1. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the
parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior
writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by
the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail
over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including
exhibits to this Agreement.
6.2. Representatives. The Chief Executive Officer for the City of Costa Mesa ("City's
CEO") or his or her designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement
and may issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of the City, called for
by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.
Consultant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who
shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of
Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement.
6.3. Project Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with
Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.
2 G PSA 11
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and be its
agent in all consultations with City during the term of this Agreement. Consultant or its Project
Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City.
6.4. Notices: Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications
concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery,
facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be
deemed served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal
delivery; b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 48
hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such
communication is sent through regular United States mail.
IF TO CONSULTANT:
Interwest Consulting Group Inc.
15061 Springdale Street, Suite 206,
Huntington Beach, Calif. 92649
Tel: 714.625.5840
Fax: 714.899.9146
Attn: Tim DZmura
E-mail:
tdzmura@,interwestgrp.com
IF TO CITY:
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel: 714-754-5604
Fax: 714-754-4856
Attn: Khanh Nguyen
6.5. Drug --free Workplace Policy. Consultant shall provide a drug-free workplace by
complying with all provisions set forth in City's Council Policy 100-5, attached hereto as Exhibit
"D" and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's failure to conform to the requirements
set forth in Council Policy 100-5 shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and shall
be cause for immediate termination of this Agreement by City.
6.6. Attorneys' Fees: In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection
with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all
costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the
exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms,
conditions, or provisions hereof.
6.7. Governing- Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the
laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of
laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto
agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in
Orange County, California.
6.8. Assignment: Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign,
transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of Consultant's interest in this Agreement without
City's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance
shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this
Agreement. Regardless of City's consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of
Consultant's obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder
' -A (cq — PSA 11
for the term of this Agreement.
69. Indemnification and Hold Harmless Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold
free and handless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, at Consultant's
sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings
brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees arising out of the
performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the work
undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall
apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its
employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action,
complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of the
Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action,
complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and
employees based upon the work performed by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized
subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Consultant, its employees, and/or
authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or
indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole active
negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other
indemnity provisions contained either in the City's specifications or Consultant's Proposal,
which shall be of no force and effect.
6.10. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an
independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur
any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent.
Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time,
or in any manner, represent that it or any of its or employees are in any manner agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all
payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation,
Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers,
agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the
services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any
and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the
independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to
indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable
worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees
due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of
Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under
this paragraph.
6.11. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee,
agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement
System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant
shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or
employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or
q -
PSA 11
subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions,
which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.
Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or
ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors
providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby
agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City,
including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement
to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions
for PERS benefits.
6.12. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to
Consultant's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render
any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require.
6.13. Ownership of Documents. All findings, reports, documents, information and data
including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, files and tapes furnished or prepared by
Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be
and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information
shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City.
Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use
of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure
to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages,
losses, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from City's use of such
documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete
documents furnished by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports,
documents, information, data, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs,
files audio tapes or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized
representative, at no additional cost to the City.
6.14. Public Records Act Disclosure: Consultant has been advised and is aware that all
reports, documents, information and data including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or
files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, and provided to City may
be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California
Government Code Section 6250 et. seq.). Exceptions to public disclosure may be those
documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that tern is defined in the California
Government Code Section 6254.7, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret.
The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is
designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the
disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure
is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.
6.15. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California
applicable to Consultant's services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the
Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et Ls.) and Government Code Section
1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform
- 24V - PSA 11
work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that
would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or subconsultants to
abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute.
6.16. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results
under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation
as may be required by the City's representative, regarding any services rendered under this
Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to
Consultant occurs, then Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design
drawings, estimates and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct
the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard
to the correction.
6.17. Prohibited Employment. Consultant will not employ any regular employee of
City while this Agreement is in effect.
6.18. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any
of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent
this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be
deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by
reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced.
6.19. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and
negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as
expressly provided herein.
6.20. No Third Party BeneficiarRights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole
benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental
beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third parry shall have any right in, under or to this
Agreement.
6.21. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement
are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or
accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
6.22. Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting
of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with
respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties
and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof
favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this
Agreement.
6.23. Amendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective
successors and assigns may amend this Agreement.
6.24. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or
- 2 %(1 PSA 11
compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a
waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of
this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative
of the parry against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy
in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in
respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
6.25. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the
offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of
this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party, is materially
impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent
jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good
faith negotiations.
6.26. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall
constitute one agreement.
6.27. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the
parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said
parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by
and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Date:
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
Date:
CEO of Costa Mesa
CONSULTANT
Date:
Signature
-nn beMoge-") , T3�r,--z,-ag O F=- j Lj41C,\q9t^ ?V %cc -j
Z-'�S V - PSA 11
Name and Title
Social Security or Taxpayer ID Number
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Project Manager
ATTEST:
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
Of the City of Costa Mesa
Date:
Date:
r 0'
Date: Q /2 -
Date: Z
Date:
-Z5 PSA 11
CITY COUNCIL POLICY 100-5
SUBJECT
POLICE'
EFFECTIVE
PACE
NUMBER
DA'T'E
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
1 of 3
BACKGROUND
Under the Federal Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, passed as part of omnibus drug legislation
enacted November 18, 1988, contractors and grantees of Federal funds must certify that they will
provide drug-free workplaces. At the present time, the City of Costa Mesa, as a sub -grantee of
Federal funds under a variety of programs, is required to abide by this Act. The City Council has
expressed its support of the national effort to eradicate drug abuse through the creation of a
Substance Abuse Committee, institution of a City-wide D.A.RE. program in all local schools
and other activities in support of a drug-free community. This policy is intended to extend that
effort to contractors and grantees of the City of Costa Mesa in the elimination of dangerous drugs
in the workplace.
PURPOSE
It is the purpose of this Policy to:
1. Clearly state the City of Costa Mesa's commitment to a drug-free society.
2. Set forth guidelines to ensure that public, private, and nonprofit organizations receiving
funds from the City of Costa Mesa share the commitment to a drug-free workplace.
POLICE'
The CEO, under direction by the City Council, shall take the necessary steps to see that the
following provisions are included in all contracts and agreements entered into by the City of
Costa Mesa involving the disbursement of funds.
1. Contractor or Sub -grantee hereby certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in
Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's workplace, specifically the job site or location
included in this contract, and specifying the actions that will be taken against the
employees for violation of such prohibition;
___
21f�s �2_ PSA 11
SUBJECT
POLICY
EFFECTIVE
PAGE
NUMBER
DATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
2 of 3
b. Establishing a Drug -Free Awareness Program to inform employees about:
1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
2. Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs;
and
4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations
occurring in the workplace;
c. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the
contract be given a copy of the statement required by subparagraph A;
d. Notifying the employee in the statement required by subparagraph 1 A that, as a
condition of employment under the contract, the employee will:
1. Abide by the terms of the statement; and
2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation
occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction;
e. Notifying the City of Costa Mesa within ten (10) days after receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 from an employee or otherwise receiving the actual notice of
such conviction;
f. Taking one of the following actions within thirty (30) days of receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 with respect to an employee who is so convicted:
1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and
including termination; or
2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local
health agency, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
ZS � PSA 11
SUBJECT
POLICY
EFFECT1fVE
PAGE
NUMBER
DAVE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
3 of 3
g. Making a good faith effort to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation
of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 F, inclusive.
2. Contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be deemed to be in violation of this Policy if the City
of Costa Mesa determines that:
a. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has made a false certification under paragraph I
above;
b. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has violated the certification by failing to carry out
the requirements of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 G above;
c. Such number of employees of Contractor and/or sub -grantee have been convicted
of violations of criminal drug statutes for violations occurring in the workplace as
to indicate that the contractor and/or sub -grantee has failed to make a good faith
effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
3. Should any contractor and/or sub -grantee be deemed to be in violation of this Policy
pursuant to the provisions of 2 A, B, and C, a suspension, termination or debarment
proceeding subject to applicable Federal, State, and local laws shall be conducted. Upon
issuance of any final decision under this section requiring debarment of a contractor
and/or sub -grantee, the contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be ineligible for award of any
contract, agreement or grant from the City of Costa Mesa for a period specified in the
decision, not to exceed five (5) years. Upon issuance of any final decision
recommending against debarment of the contractor and/or sub -grantee, the contractor
and/or sub -grantee shall be eligible for compensation as provided by law.
/CSG PSA
_ ZEA
PSA 11
EXHIBIT A
,.,,,...,.. r �. ,. ,. ,.. ,
Prapared
OV,
%vity of Costa Mesa
`Keith Clarke
BuNding OWW
City of CDSta meu
77'FaIr Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 9266
By
Interwest Consulting Group
15a6l sprlmgdale Street, Suite 205
Huntirigton Beach, CA 92649
714,899-9U.39 OffiCe
714.899,9146 Fax
wwwAnterwestarp-Com
Table of Contents
CoverUG -r......._.... .................................._..... - --- ... ........... .... .... : .... ... ,,...,.,....•,..,..,..:I
SECTION I
Exparlance ...... .......... ...................
Ganaml Infamm'Ven ............ ............ ...... ........ ................... ,.,--._............3
COMPAMM* ............................. ..................... 4
SSCT�*M 2
QualMr.affano .............. .......................
Team membefs and QUmfm=UWm.-...- ......
artmftsttanchart.,,- ........... ...................................................... ...........
SECTION 3
methade-10.9y.... . .-- .... ....... ..................................... ................ ...........
Intmmext AdvanUse .............. . ......................................... ........ - ....
pmjoe-t contmu ........... 1-1 1. •---....---...._.....1.10
Understanding Sc opo of Sorvft*s ..................... ............................. AQ
Building Sa" Ptar, Review � Impmton ......................... - ............. .......
Gtodingfimprove-men! Plan Review I �nsp�n, ................ .......
Fire rx-pa*rert Plan Review I InspWica .....................I.............,........."
SECTION A
QuWft Assurance- ............. ......
SECTION 6
Cost0 Providing Services . ........... ........ ....... . ........................... ...................:21
591tTgan -6
Convemlence of Office Llazafian.- ....................................................................... 23
SeCTI ON 7
Referances- ..................................................................................... ...... .................
oficTion a
Appand4K* Ra-14Um....... ........................................... .................................. ...... 32
—2� —
May 3,,20"12
Keith CISM1 CSO
I�frrq afog
77FW9 Of W
0,4y of Costa Mm, CA 9264
Mtn Check ftvim an an As-1.4tWed Basis
O` is
Wemesi pmAdn an sm=fim. 04= to =m OM te Qty's hum bigftg wd sa€ &%F, due our
pvposW oliffs e4, vWw�.`*r wand eVerfim wt our dem=MW canm$nnnt to swing cWt mods
`eig grwm of ft, dwtt,,q City i�s t"r� dub to 1e romt bAct cfts and M` wmk f -Ay With
aid Omh We:,% M -m r d :DeveWp mni StiMm. to ,� svAm am dalifmred in a petal
wd cmedwis n, www
fief l �S large elmjh- aver 900 8MOYM - to SOM 4 d yW NAd $*IV ria s, Ye
a out rafervm, , 10ude than may citim of oW. Se - Y Urdu, to ;W (fit
MM OMA out *my to $=Muly arm WtMM C wm
We urdwjbrd ft CAy der .0 rete a bW. q. fzd flo W provide a YBMy e, m-7�mded 4,V
irz:lu ft l ow and inspeaw wry W Wlft W ` < ; Y. OfOVW-A° 14Mft M. M W, V
will m a Wa h f ml of cuevMr Sats€ 0 a b 0 0 t W rT W ark W il i W= EV ID a n eF, 16 ent 1
�a w a t �ed i nr iedla y � rtt to ft � C j • ',moo � ate
mt ft + its City to w= ft City of Costa Mml
Intemest Werkles 4= ttiripal fir, , OSPWO . v2ffic VIgh eri'n' bukvu a: -!,A SaWy, US,
pw4erty, faciky rmapmW. and mzVuufim mnsqwywet wv.o pu g agars 1 X,
ar4 gag -am o4o9omnt r . We b0iave w exclum =vrarmt to vibix agency its is im;�V. SM
A aVen us bD%vW,%vj teal or pametwd mwes m9atfIrg =nWs of - nlz,,est
asa wiry d5+aat� r r fW r l}raid S�= amfly dew, SM hwee
F l�yips` A&-- 9"M clanrorr tt pmIt4ns vidan IAM*.xw CaVorhla Ot". Qr stO W-kAM k xr
RAfic 'P*I�rksdry , Oty Er rs, CapM Aloject Mwagem, MSt t 14 chief t irtg
Wim, r quite a hili Weel of swvOehity was spa, mi ti swdal intffWt gmp 1V.V&
rdl%.ty, cur �lwd sIf truly WWeM* values IN hpMme a fbcus on
fnmmts V, IM, paw WDA CbW4 t 8 Mwet wup MwV4 004uwy on aw am M
sam. W of ft v; f r T�pvpvszd fair ft FAsImmnt has bw cweVq WAVO ba$W r;a our
enderswotdinaof ft res & Lv Oty.
- Zs(q -
G as ter ,PE, CEO, AICP vAl wr* m Rmc�O.M-Chvjs ash as ft managanw. =,W lothe Cky. Mr,
IYZroum is an of ltwwmt Cwwjlhng Vmup aro ha hg Why to W am
mamay agrwrmk�& Ong Ot", M CEO, LEED AP,*fll mare as ft,�&i MvMw (m. ft C*Vret aN
71m D7mUM PE, COO, MCP
Spingdole Stftt, $te M
Buch, CA 92649
714,899.%39 0MCe
714M9.9146 Fm
Gmg 666, M CRO, LEED AP
*W61 sprillwe aw, 61,115 M
HUNJVW Bemh, CA 9264a
714.W140300fte
714.M.9146 Fox
WO W4 SM Mobiea
4s,wmm Comwift Gmwp rm Me *Uff aW epaeterw'm Won, to fia wge of sefVm reqOv` _ Wre
we mom the aWMtra and skft r=ewxv to vA Vdh ft exrArQ QV stg b sumemMy
wvem gmeg,,b� paa�& We Waw ft k --Is. to WAV Ve Cfty of Coft Mina m falafis,
4' PAMAV dr; =Wws in a cost offw&v &tros,pot m4nnorexpmnced, oW,waffsommd 40 kW.. am W W=$ kmw-
w afix me amly loa&do�/ WmIffeat and 8*1*4 Go* M*Wws
RwtiV a h Wal of cust=sr smko kr fnfamaJ wd extema? cWwmrs
Umc mg Me %*a to WhIhnmce 10 staodord-s' and rep''lattem WA the roeed f6r
prodk9gbRily, un,*Mjfy, ad efthncy
V A kcW *m wfth ft Offly to prow* quick rosponm and fasl t= amad tkm
loyn svpw�te ov opplunitt to waswt our pry; fjy y r aid omldw�; R m%,w,,s vafid br a
Word of0Dttgys We are a4Wbt to mm with Vu to dl== cv in mcm, dew at
ycw cmvwl&fm P €j N yw ha" any quWam or muW dike addftdOkimaJm.
Ift D'ZMr24 PEI 0130, AMP
l%lex" svlwm Me=
-2-00-
OF-EIAL 3NFOR ATION
�t'it s pomp t ", m w� sm� f it�+��s
ih a � fw wri t, , .. Wa cunt awoign,� 120 mpwm
deparlmmts ftugimtt *wig -
of SW hn t4 6#w Wd 0=*m nm9mmm, pw.ImsYoM rwmam s Uftrolm Oft M IndodU Cid'
irm, R ir, woft Vim, OW&M oychl's, T. ralfic y rs r w �' m r t
1. Th10, owa hO WM of a gmum wid senstivity WNW& WrInIaly andWW
ftnest gi''Up is&=r Via value ft hpmwt* af, a wus that mpmMILS ft intamos of w pub; apmy dels
On% PON* to ft db -s tt sus.
We Cur �,ry y���y, OVV yo
OWS, r s ��, p , s� � �tt�,s ply �€�"� t t� P� 0,
��ryF�49,�.}16y�ek 77` 7y�y�k3`.. IliG��r, EaS �pµy.�CWV09, iTTM. ki�pl2,1a"aB dF9�Of�,,.t�,,�7 }�e�5,Y- lust &tO M"," A �,�,,y�,. 6gy� [,}ltd
6� F't8'fl M1aitl �Ai�i 4ifr1f4d ` 'MSF Fa� Ra� � a a tCr Aa �C4 1eE41'f� 4 �£A a:f�.Fr N"r�� rft PWS .q IMMS, ICC
{ i if-,SpKtus 6,.J Ow : *s"" SPRdarving in "siding.,e plail MWMI Wd ' edOn'Ni W
1 gomrt agemles
Our term v.*d&" is built on s0pte y6t'ORM CMtwW sfifvlcO P6V 0 ,,:
Wia OD :,It oftr 00SIF mwi arej as a rewat�, r4�Aft t t platf t d Wiest as
OW4 =r, W,$ fom w4agingA Wt. Phf t fe vi OWV sem
— 2(01
COPAROLE CONTRACTS
ENT
YI
.+F
tyOf E�q OW W
ay dG
y of Lam Fant
-y of MA m
CityOf N
C,„p•'a ftrv..a
oty,5f P= r
t$ v
"y c Ytft Ufta
Los TXs *
ww cwlt
Rmiew
phr, RIV*w, InVOCOM
pwRaN* w a lrspftm
PIP RWIWOO & tp
cam, mm qamw,w
ice.
Int �
RROW,►s
It
E��
P
Romwa"�W
Fusin a ftW Revic-M, €fit �l Te&,T;aFw
ftAJFq cff4w,. pim purmw t r fier i
RIM RVAMI Fly
Aw Ro&w
Impel=
Plws Ravlok
Qualifications
TEAM MEMBERS AND QUALIFICATIONS
ufvm -R ftowoffofr w,I bw=, s*t serer ft vit-m SwJwa
.. a OdOW YOM 4 SW fU pfd all Of *Uf 41WOMS.
D'Zm , M c8o, MCP as Pdw4r40w I'm boms 24)vws ofuxperlor= in amino a
nufter of juMdc6vmft&4W wAImfn Caftinam l `o y of Wftfg dW. Pw4c woft d,,W-04� c1
LM A? htp 26 yen of eVeriera 0 ft VOW WO will mM QS ft NMM Offild8l Mma..
�1I I I Is; fess ani proposw I a bWe. nwAW std wo k*d Wft t- Appwdx
Staff
8UUdLqv 4OCdS-00ty
fiWL0 FM PLAN RF-Vfl fiV f. ASP FLAN' RIVIEW
4tu, Lb o4r. PLAN Rr-ytE'w'
Tom Campb4BU
9J>!<L'Ilb FjAN OeViViN
Ran hle-r
99 Lg°INGs PLAN RFYIF(
pave PI sIlteal
WILDING PLAN REVIEW
*M K*.no
GUILDMG FLAY+ MW<EW
Van mmnow
1?4sFkcZtfj*I
8 -ad 'MfH oke
Dan ucc&rocoItb3�}'re
a 17
Orading I Impr i'vem#'PR4...
Bab ll
F413 1MC-SAKIrl FALAI~! REVI&N
Jon cI?o o
€fiCd'"sFd s[ PLAN k6WEWI
ma* wosset
€UGlFdsrMG PLAYS •,~ o'tE*
$two P
E14 GJNEERNG PLAN REVfE' +
Tom
02SE+y€yOE`R]
�ia�gmmha
wlA!i'mona6�a�
/��(�'{l�ga�S}i4f�lL•p��'y�I y
R�!��i ZT `�i9'�%I,.jFI Yt9 OWA ;Eft
Les Chapa�lvvpp��f#i!'�rC�i�'afdWed
M
Stuwt 81skestey
hila,?, REVIEa AY:I? IN5436C' fs.*h
Rau'lPer
I, #Ni EVl:EW
i tPAYAh*M I mar twf s the Q03 of SO& mwwmse*effm OMAN I ow Q of C .8
Mm. n s�m m5ums 410'S WOW WIMM at WPM GAPAMs W ccaugneWK A
Building Plan Check Svrvices
Ga .
MOW RIO= 00
•. Ygii%f°,•e�� SOPPY 'WAd RR„s,",'�D�f-
3MJeffThanwoF
FSr'u �ti� F>' +S� �3 �.�e
�s� C� .y
MOST29
OF sw
�,��uu��stss
ODD � •N'
WM
e65e6
.. -R195LF 'aRW
P""a.ai
y�
7�.Wp'W }�'�
���:BG�y5P�cO�a��ag
�J47Fl�'
hm�vsfh
MICA"
MW ON w W
R
(��-
y
MO TWUMMVOW"
Doo RVOMW 04 Rolvw
MC DOW R VAWT
MHU
Ras Gws
ONDD Wood MQ MUM
f4v
5EMS"M
C3
ANOA=0
I= FWn€
fes)
flava P MW
V=T Gefted Haio.q MS
"Sm9owbgMr
0 NUM
aw l
Isul
Q0.4 Www AMMAM
I
F
- 2V5 --
MAUR
WA643-44
t VT�- IMM Ix
iWIS
Im Emaw
�
Art Vokwx
CAW W11W WOW (a*
WAP4
d�tt
i
�¢�ry7
fgkuido FNM
i
ad Cooke
X'YX437d ft
Yy
�d PAM" IX-4pW&
cWA,W mmo
W
7 ��x OW MIM
mtmlowmd
MP -M
ce
'#
M,71
`tLi4o'�'411.. 4F}Y
M719-50
rtU�K F9 `elf
LM
l Mschamft
1 d4
1AFINO RL , w
im P�W WOWIV
KWU
ora-diglirovar t Plan Review
Bob l
�iW441
— Ptwig
m
MMA WOW"
fir ' d
Q
C;
TRI489
i
. 'lam ' 01 E' �
7
I
F
- 2V5 --
ORGAW5ZAT90NAL CHART
v,j,o ;fop tI Yfol Rib' sU W=�r4 VW—fes didaMs tc. CV-1inU`5 thO r "Mit "� 01Uffie-Q'S to Me 04
Of costa WS&
jnte,-Nmy ev 1p
�y stg,,Tmg god As wy%to�,- mvom W.,Jk�,o In t
owelt ansge to � ao a%,SI*ot ex*,V sMff- As dovownnt Poomirg is cy;)*M, any dwvm in W"fAbd cap
I e ofM by a demm 0, off PMWM WO WN 440 MW* 1 at POf PMMblts of -5b tO � M Pry
felilva arsj add -raw my �mos "as In wwktW lbal cfmn =w in dmlWWt
Todws co ct : vlvb � F'�'�� hnaNd vMMEd 'm� oq VOTI e .' :
Inwyp,l CVWNV GWP SUMM MM wp oftmos. 0? .rt €Nke ft StAv M=M badon W4 at GIZ scare tffm
.wwy�per.f rets � Ld 5a
pMA A mm�Gh � w C MSfo°ung!fir � am the
(�4+� ta �• Y tnd our lo" wv, fty 60 and YW Matoy av" WM am
F£e wk"iwdaWN lh9 have bGGR IMM MW wd &V SAY Wyw£
';as' V/S are 0=%Wed to PAYMag a Mw)€O
ffMAWWhftft. OUT sw,NO AMOMW fin, a vxa4WWrimer and
WY be & kl;Vvd to Mmen "VA fCosta 's budge ONAWOS. We �,ftr AV wowve ° riff
of �bft tnao it � to Cly � .
rates Cfty,,Ek*5- Wo d �lfirsilfad w' fer o4h On MwawS S fOP asw&ROO Of
za %Wko 01 Fob, , O)gMy W4 oty of amb Mwa sdogwJ wdos wcd eft, TW oty
vWcta tr -k vo? tWpcje awfsfargot4 tO*. enpws, go�m iand tvc& oppodar#y
ft
tvmmwpa, i' ' ae code w4k9M t O* &0 On YG9T df
effeCovv mom" W,e t o ft Oar pK* a Unhod h Amor,"WEA "aTA'
txrotw wA oftrttspa4maffll a nd wef�
+a �' sfapdwlj� wa ore f '; tjfntaipiesft"J ,ASA MeMbRY
CASA meq,;;IlnJ$;. Ca0mv. LEED wd FmW and �tr'� Rv Sof ' s
Amity to 49st MWOO WMS tv MM YOW �O wfi Wddy fiMNOO �Ly$° ' Wes to Mech
a fil
in a&aS���p�, ��gd3�n �d p�r�� ' � i p i����i{? y Wed
pytry �
ii 4t Ses�,tT4+.r ft +ese=wapre�goeAfe4 �ef. vpd0wr . ,, *r�RTL �,j'�e�aWl d3�f W
an rJG� �,�Gf`l....£92 �^ ?�3:5�
(c%-7
PkCJr.CT OCUTROLS
TN wmin we pwok are arys dwety=jdMr,,Wwd 5W MrAmed tO Om -v wO M,'Of Osmd the MINift *�
desited by 01y, bul also gay wAhin M, firffcld mpadly of y-,tj,- aperefing ty,�. We have tmzid towl$ VIM wd
-tm& ce knowwp Of "no"aim buqet 4, spKifMol w!r� to expemdalow and cw. W=yy mocirad wth
mrit prwemft wA pOwt". We W,, work h dm pdnamlp wafivm City Wmft Our ROMM md
Of
A crv,-W Vc*l MAW Imohm 906M ft, ltlft imm-5 tEftfed to 04t m05, Wo do" VA* W, OW4UM St e%t
nmw,**v xqjw VnWmts. owus, a We, 0 prqed (Pirwi tawvg via a afiWamd doebm W&I
mgrz ht by a&gWAd mm%v Tits aN,4 mtmyvim keM a wW" budget pm -em knawedp of W'm b
lWoW in
sW up or &m, wd ermm afl pajecls am xwWwW SM W o a W*j mmm
IOWW_-g 4�&r,$uM�n 6mvp dm re, intend b uftk% I;le swv,).,m d %�)-= mors R� ft worm, ww of wek UMV
thisortVacl,
UNDERSTANDING OF SCOPE Of 39MVICCIS
We t� et (jewfis to rn a qualw nm b prwMe a vvfqy of 0V pqxml N,
r t,MVula W of Tho wvtcT,i m Pw RFP whficb kckdo the
4f -j Wely Rv I�oww,4 ImPeLlLm
Gfal,'Tg i IMMVW, ant MIt ROV�AWVW IMPWkM
R m Depammt Ran Revww and Impa0m
........... .... ....... .. .
... .............. ....
tra 0vwArq,Gaup ho a p4-mfl t Tword PWIAM9 ftw Swm W WOW to J4%fCbMl the r ft
ftie of C4ftmla InnnmW. is pmpared lo if r,,r&T-e*y start wcA, for ft QIty -
Tl+,0 pmv� bmm 4 cwnpmw � h4klyevefimmed, QwWw-mlow crivoed vemwWho tzm succewUY
MM m" nt p� - Wa view mr arA � is W provide ft kkWng:
A tam of puftufmals wO h~f womm and -Ms in =c=U manzZwwiml of buMng
dowrriol arnes sfaff wo a ca ter W** f0m od ffimto kr"W400 ofd depwmev
paroa arrd g000dum w pumomg carve ms mmewrp MM *Yw 04e dopomwoft aW mWe
agwclj�s
LkemadPhn ftvkw ER9ksM&,W0r 10C, 04M. ft$ ZkOftOM ft-J'IftMO SV &no On
fo e,,,r-vrD cwmAw= to ei mag Lon of ft Ofy and Silo,
AccehlLated Ren RlMrW SzMkW M be MMSfed M.'MW W&Mt Wd ft W�� imdappralmd by
mw cqy peof I& comww"mmem-
Cwtftd lftSPfttWW) W." hmad armi &.0 Ngbestwn-awnt to
amwwww
Aid any mquired m*WjWs m?jkmd to pi FeV ew w ftd kwecthn des.
,e Ru�519 of pi vk up aud deff my at ea"pilans to and km the tAY at
-- 2— (c. I �S —
>1.
Building and Safety Plan v3 "
tad 's saw maWme tem,ar , ' .; q&,W wrWh�
COMOMW-4- � fly; w POVIe are m4y 10 t V&I s€imB= ad
r..4,.. V Plan 160YfGtiw afresda A MwdLo Ord 04*46,0 i AMP awsftAm fm ciiYSf S*,?5441m S7''Glh the adgged
Sem# OD* ThID C4 a CostaMwa Wmpaf C* , ft Amssftft Nt r acd Em's° OmsenfiNm
mquOmna as mandaW by We Me 24 and 0 aWk
Vdafy�aA,►a�
+ ITPwlaWmcmt Wated to 0.rdws, mWa i :fr and W7*re4S XP.MWa
mmm Sad W*W= Rexd4w n9Y , Or DWtWP PW!G J
P;ar� & rF�E7, �: -a-14,uA Aaf w Crede' by t s"� Via+
Code antorvmtaftna
c At3r
Cajmj',g elm'5 tnm WW Omm mmmm wit pry unbmed mcommmUgmt AVms'd
fry
heo ft &Affmg Ojrpdo m-" an WwwAd dr t..11 plan rem cwm*ls SOpa 10 mmw and
ape d by the 1ft"n copatwL
TranqmjOrM Maw
rte s T' Gymp will wmnge fia;A al p<-kjp a^ t ,r fJf rr cud na {ter f% .
'Morwest Wes yaotd reds � Fr -p d dem j "ell trA gral 0 ;imM wry swvice
MUWenjjy # �a ram t, e >n ,� tumik fax Brij r a d .
We work Iwd if) awwramdalm any turjr -a: t � AA daslmd ly ft j,-&,drAOn: Nlulfj-diswmaq WOWS are
IY
i `#m in " f Ing Vm a ar €a r c�� fk �� f�rid "�� i ,
;sh morel homu:
- 2 (bq
Type of Job
Mzximum Tarn Around Vme
Fid Check Re-Chech
RESMZNTML
t ea , n l i
10 Wm"r Dwjm
6 CaWdw Ows
ih ii - - ...
10 mar D4S
5 Via'
_ .-
10 9!�r Da
5 tAndw fps
�.�... �,......
.........,.....
,.,, ,-
re.
10 Cftidar 02p
.9 CAndu
mmmul: S Nan ft.Waw"Suift
ptan fav s wn=r wd fWtnd&m (l =') !�==M aW F eW a,
3wVwawenw wr SA 1 w of pw, i *Wftd to ft Cil mer mM�" is t o
Ar. den*s and
p s., r r tr. ��p`e3NO � �,....yoDde ••, t ,�.1�ia ?ear �'est'�'wmy&,V.�/��r.��yp���'l�,� �yy gte a}. e}y�r. �?�r
::7' oqh d=,,wt i`P,' (Lo.. - i`ex 1t .fE , fY.18i�]F wh , %,, � ls, Wt]'.{ YT1:42. i{G d G? NFK�C s ie6Pil ,
e ftvared to age 21otnu &nnjto g prfs (ia.g_ eta . M*M ) As mwl, Fes, M&Or
a rte d? e c £ r 2 ill VM pw r tw OwrA ;3 Md =,dn3le M
c� i1r iii tom• i r� to
IV l .fir P appmol.
..Sift u Asea & MczdrM A.ft
ir;ter f# Cofitjq Ofeup hn;A fuq�fm sW of . r r wars"d€<WWO w ` wts, Swclurr and ciei
'sires � l� � - � pan fog1 . ft w o,� CRY rr g r w-, t gra ?
,wAaw i t trs 1 €mo. Alm, may of r ir��`° ' ' i crosss tT s*d aria$ ` 'r ' i'g#r tii f s $
cowu nrO. in"M-n dlies as a 3Med =,t,56AWUY,
In i , :swf ,-'s &(Nfwe for ��� i or pry � tri rr r , i� �. ra t�.#s will l �
supW t, Wid InspedmwsorA as ri as . Wit son* fele lis OU'%, via
mm-Sngs a-4miated NOh pr M ftl vm pin ruiew we 4 W Of to R
19"UWATO Plan SSC**
Oto Wr, 4am Gxwp+ir ,ai4PM-Ades WnC€ r,lig wd Pi M mvir) w wvim IV, MA
k,jri5' , We hm fid ft wkvnwew-r3t'E. indt 3 g the;,, wn =510rii , tim a wwa
ranp of :vends and PVectatium mpra ran %on ea*w Wt WMWQ SOAMM ft h
oO tavep SjwtwM W MVwsN Wtp_m OVMng wow d ft W meiet ire,€' d",s and ho -n
SgAs w,*--. Someats, such as W Lake City and C-Jwk Cmft Tem - bDfto&LM m,vej, F4t4
ww4t° I-arevW1 devebpe' nt yffias - have1iCO rekO #art aW plan MOO*
sysWn, five mntwt w have kund Wzftbms M havi; prWifffly W. W4MOW 5" 5vV4Prtt
G l y neW amm w our FTP Me 0 albq fir ii f$ to digiW oWlerA ft*to wabff, RaftwaVw-
in-i"r s ptmh to "amor, pim mmew m p *" ram, vm mem wum mr cliera we bit wwo by
a wr p vt r o of Marr #tat mdld be Wmd 0 the 0,T/9 spwft W
CfegN a symn WkiW W ft ash of ft i; hdLmt r lent i&" :fir W41aW WIVMM;WW I& the
CU90MIMM 0 ft SWDEI 0 � w gr ek Er rii PIM ice,° ViN q MIn " neds of OVW dewmuft.
with ft Oftfa of =P=fV* pa" FTP avmfor €c f1iw hostm et r if ,r is t m Is no
��t�+fi�l�� � cs�:r�pr���rc�r�� ��e�k� Er�t� r���� stn i`:� • 2�i � � �I�g
`mna that 13-dit pI I€ttwmst or any WW serOw proviler.
v be* is that tri' sfr�. d VWr- ww-sNp of whow syvern Is put In plow so that �w aonkd y= seMbe
0,6el., OPOm In ft ("An a-4 do not wwra 1,w fir , o om pv< wlarAror a pfavider.
Nm Raves TratMaq MeMad & Ming
ii:_ staff m r1a rkn " ► t f tatom fit":1 b� it r off ar li
a ' its $Wrwdr, Towds 2W male pMav related dam wArles as dnvad by the C�y.
req,&W by y' V. eakom:, Ong w sets. I y spe::1W m ats p .t wim fike us In
keep h T44:
t'ItTAT-St tarsu1919 GMIP Was a =tM-69"d"M to f "Wh VW WE* ar, WMS Mugh A ft "
pry fvn the ar r a up anft st,%Xnr,4 r d oM of ft %W, aW-owd rdc=Tei'se
wofmagan Wch as WgjW yrc{� jlp, �ttnp}�syq/ y oled r��4r/a�p�. migned W''�a�{ro..�vyla"qs}c O y O"PWu "wm r ay€moi,. ply
{1gev,aw� t31sEm�'Sdgi*sltgO�y,�n date cuf;f.�' g revie'Y wn be �. GIN aJR Sk
mpDrs
I0, Wa;�, 1 pmvir On t for aw .; ith a elan" g � `mpl gma to 2rny
rep
std is avAaVe Mwlt $WVKss hours ta awftl Z", of am WdTq Cow
wiiw In pr r �a'sut '� # tty r ° Iit t i
we a -i,wat s directy to a ate: we YM return no I r than 24 yrs,
Oar company wrpfta5Werirur = +rrer swl.a 4o A V, ow, .eta° i'9 'No take an mr-Ok ox appugrA to
r &Oes• atm vMV b fn 3"th clWfls fo, pre a n rneWigs" preWUO r Wao or as needw
to nwve owpkox w& rem plan ramw mAs in ttv vmt eftiimt mmw ;aWMe. In addtm, ft st at
Itrt�t tt qs a V" � to „ a —� � : On s R pts r�vl�w; s S�t
�� truces.
hmvwzst Consutgog Omp's or Irwsf atVOM, p$ms examInem arA r--,peclm m4afflargd. Ow 07Wmm of
pmvift supercrv am to aMt=ats� moors xi d domm, Our ph4mWy is to pnv�ft off svv=
In a pv%Oonat =mus and cembm-ab" wwmr. a an=r2p our cif b ork as peat of V* px,�W timp to
�t
rF-na Otoup Is ato to awmnmdale speruapm' pW riow nes such mtt; rn.�=pw:,
car pts , e �
pr s�fic t> mr� gms pwWw i � � f
tizw types P UWW On tie cowexty ff W V'Q;WS 85 wMa as t 'r;orW ft SftdWR
1MWWR9 C G'M's SM 0 ff�pmxwR MMIMM VA WO* Vdh ft 07, V OMW I'fta 22 SII as
F' 1h app5wnts w des�S-M10 Ali plan romw 1s&Our staff Midw &O%Y VA-, ifs i€
d r rs r�.arlrg U Van r ev,;ew pry to mWvo off €sem. irMwM +Carom &04 P
ParParwAW, alt 411 1escurces Wd tmhkv oft%/ to =dIxt p ;TM -WS, lr rs dlrg ;i WWI W4 of IN
80wlge Qywsendm, v%, , Pmedures mai fbvra
°t hus '*3 Oogablftes �n Plmi Check Am"
T Inlet s If n r�y� Mcfa 9trk� }may cl tt� sipOw4 ', gy ms in . �sf'ixfr,e n3qugs
In � lflin Yea 1&tlr s r�rr WOW,"Rat'. a t � �r�' Fr..7A3ed at the err
Ws sOI aW ft Wduaf st rests iii in ft` appwak pwlm addManW 1ps r` w or, "f't,rtfs
t�Ilft�s.
Amhftacturaf
ftwwOansufting
€',Wwxvv Wqe COMMM441"*w; Uftal, indLwfd,,Wit 2,, OMiPD 3 meftEt afte bugdjm, W;d resWenrial �ectg.
Ise bu I are, R MOMLS
ODmWgW Om rw4ew pm�x% rvne from sWq�a-sVy m9dnft' pmoft to c=p!ex ho r , lkfjs u
' rx whh ft- um wW 2ppFcation ft MA CL P
WMIN adftm std mn�Wef& We we experiewed and fwft arwil
Wdi'vWS d the W*7g Twee arip—s'
Wow Czda of -Rqgzdakw, Me 24ANSf ShWarft
Pa* I ftm#t 6 W4 0 XFPA Godw & Stvd3r&
fnfameme &ft" coo ffaq
Stmutuml
0 v- stAaM snWrmrs bowe expefim dmgmig ad wew"7g PTAM with vlfta y aq buVMM MNOWS %C"Amp,.
V
VAW
01
Cawale
Stof
Offf art, -MMS
have �Md at W, ft -*d a wpie am" Of I.", v,'W Syslems kluff-rj-
,.,r
FEMA C=PW. Stie Af"V Fmmw
Ile
cwivve M.&MM Ffor. w
&&bqRbstmradSr"dF=m Energy
/
Wood SNmv-V Sy&Vxs
EbmIft- Smoedftmw
Sheawasydams
GMOAtw Braced ft.IW
Cwft Mf ad Col Tq "V)QtM
PM-IC114rowd I PW - fwv;veO4 CW-0-wo
Or shrA#W erq--mvis a,,,A we experwvced with I
priyVi!§m Of M,%j P, We, Cod" jwvdjaoe4
vMIMS Cf:
V T* 24 Pae, 2, Vdwv Z C~a We NE-fRP
aIRVula6ws (CAISC341430
V *4OrA4VW8WdrgCu* fI8C) ACI
ASCE 7-65 v FEMA M, 351 A 352
to' AMStAF & PA MDS
Mechanical, Plumbing & Fjoaldean
W%mg-w4 sW Is wO wmd �t tie CObfta Meftrk2l, Caftfon�2 Pwn 4" wd ft- QMdofia EwWmf cods&
We mv*w sAmftd deOgri documWz w arwe comp�;Ww *0 Um My codes We hm rrA&- ft tmm6m tD be
avMy-9d%4w o4va wowmNy w&w fw Vm codes as mqwed. M aw � hemsed wWw rimed in tfm Swa
CalikMia as mll w pmwr4 %-ft haW ray,* 4 r1 a=ss rwzwy std. We W€ Fes nbnftd &Sign
wwMnt,S to V*vT C=OWM 10 ft wm,'KNon of Ift N. lo ", codes,
is aeft CO*
-Cabrnia P,�V," coo
CaMbIn.18 hfff&nw=� Colk,
I
V Carflom BW*w 00se
vlJuPWOM-AdOW-1 AMWIMWft or 010Vx-w
SUVC&ndar
5 are prtF�ed bftW oil MgMI e�ftr4s of IOCV w iu�4iW wx radar w;
loe wwngthm" Rwtw" cleft
fAMATMal CWS
mmyng code
NSA S(sWw* 13 fvutmmalft &M
Wkww wftrW
wl h', -PA Stw&fds 14 (SW404
Omen SuNinf; Stan"rds
UPPA ftdanls 72 ffn damW
V MFPA 107 th &*fy COO
V FEMA 9 AFEHRP RvW*M*ewS & ExW-V Bwdag
Ox W, Is f afftff wzb t #" of Cg-Gmm bOding W, CO*WS WM PMOU dwV" WO iM POt W--�W IM' Pt�
Iron 'IMW '-S *gmff ejszV' ds k. -r
ft W -*V tie- In addftn, sW. MOMWS hwO WtMlWed int &OW, � d TabL
SfjPer ad"'be, MM63�M' V'YJ S�w We �rxkm' � n a few We b" also f(aliewd Vw t
W-4"-.Xw hMS5.
LEED
BE tip cmne' (UMC', LSED pwdw buiv q OWMs and Ow-aw-3 afrawewak fa
m" sy4twS IhZ 2P* tO PWAY W&O
LEM m';M �$4 �+-
and wamures haw wO, 8 br �-Wg Pffurm, rum any Swwh&FAY M&
- 002 emissians 96JOW, MMW MaGr W -WI -W qu2W 2nd stehwdOOP Of
saihnp, wg-te- e%c�w.j,
wd rar&-fiaMe ewgy we g, .MW&ra **5 to cof0dar. interwest
Malp. A
r24 Enemy
-6 N W,2te w but', row and
,wM4M =WAcW an large wworcial PFOAcls L, MM MS*r" addftns.
fire COO'b Phan ftvtew
OwV*)00a Mll St2ff COn
Expv�w.�. Wit* pm exMMS -T wavable
lbrdwd MOMMOC kwkHfM IX4 9W. RMW to IN
A pb% fw wmp�W= jgf�hzl) WpkzbL%5ta coft and s 'TAsW
W,�cOM- JCC Fire Code, U6km Fim COE4 Worrfis Flm OxW. Life Slwy Code, N, Aapb aid yout
b M W'w' W4 W, M -A MN
Cts Sp
OA a-wratug DOWSWItf laws
ej Individum M slalf %1�wisaig Grvjp hW CASA 0 W,
= pme&r a w4h cl*WN� 88 - In
and regVtkM if) experW� pA=mq 10 promote wxM
WN 21 02f'rs tr
jigswe wM upply a CASP OWWW PrOfMO
pftWy4D� nAm aid 4V
�j�jtj MWV- wxJ�4'ywdh, n�Lww's Pwide a &Akwnt numbr, & t�,gfdjrg jnspej;.-.-m vorpme CASp.
AU Offe-, SuPpal It
ps-t%,
cmmmitq to address p,*t
xA lu! cmownla to OXOR WPM* wt*s WO NU tO 8=M Px=- such
WOM "'amptiafm ftews. varaw, Own =19maim costs, w
bafdshp and ooWzw dwVmi
Building and Safety InspezMan
1I�r e each
Intamw C G
M,,Zfv mP as I
awmpWi0r. wvicw to h2 pw= need ts
'11 We= 2t e aM
aR Umes We lip zk out OV4WIIGs aM 40nigy sMI W40 Wmd to Inst .Match
tm Cq' -mXctm goals vid W'wphy Al k0 WW" Gmw rtsps
... . .. .....
...........
Inhvni ita& has Mtamd pran se-*Vrm wi a We qty d mextam
mah*V ctmor. Nry-n, s'wge msdeaEal davebpmp-&. wd cgn�:A
emmol wvte Wiftp. We prmide v2luabb epwivnm ga;,�
wvAr �V of the *)Wmdan proM% enaNaS Cw Peoge b q"My 4501 and Msdia pmben both m ft a r�m
2M Ifi 0* ftld,
ASQ,-,ed SJ ZF W � M&,U= -of POW4 Mftruam Ospectim ID vv,,* "w'. toe wwk e, Ow. mmxt'an IS In
wnbmwm
wad tie appmed prqat OAM as we'll as 4wVYtrq kmxs of nm-=ww=mm awmbie bukmg
codes. MwiyDf my aspmkir car4dahw tan pmw4a da Pw MVWW W'd I"PqCw Smim br ow dwft. When
Staff
to the .'r cades. "- w -M keaej to ftOWic� aftV OftW or Ww pmm
de4nated V 99 pfAw-Wwad wwk ftm A any, y0b camW dmiot be Msdved telmei Ow v*C� MPOC"S) ON
Owmtr wl to f wM44 to ft WAir*G Of f N. @I tw fna3 rawOon.
mspe"pusomal w4 --,ed w. -III be aUe b mad, urde.-Amd aid 4*jp*l Wntrwt= ;4W, Mm df 1i SW
caotMbrz, pnam and mirman a== rewts md repoft, mmm'sw"ta erecfv* aayq, and in wffirs ar4 to
wwk offecrWrMth mr�wm Ithe Puft W. gamO staff, Ins wars wM PDsm 1 0r. of appmed and mder,
mel , vw.,A4 Ws md sY* umd M Mi ig ftva2w., aM the ff wt wry buk N fwa4ds, Inspeam W
be guW,, h Er4wh wd Spar h
Iate$-mtI6a% with Vty Suff and vwPOxbn*r4S
As muRic-',pi ommftnts to Intevesl Std is NqKive 10 all Fnmm ON Pmadva V4
qur,Vy aid s q aw-mlates to yx,,' SpedAbad Mqwr "mMs. A4 Pe mmlwmvnv'vA in mv,010
oWabnns tG sumesduffy vidg wamw depatmnlls aid are accused to ptmn%, wssft and =M" wdh
4"mMir, Public �ks, Code Erkm-Du,,r End oRw vAal My stYf.-dW daparinvals.
In-SPOOMOn Schgd4de
InWwml Comft Gwip-mpectm am tr7garwith a mOk;de of jurs&lor&,sdmllng ard �-Q systems and
Calt qtkmy adopt it) CN�► reqtftmmws. "'PspeMms Wit pffiAe h�l rs bf A kmpecEm mquM mwNd.
medad; nghts, wm*wAs sit hafidafi, M" d Oiv WWbfs am 3M WAVO. to mm at #* Wz mutr vlw
nefdad,
Tools & FmmIpnmmt
.m.1mm, CamIft dip pmv�,Jes all whlcs. W rinintawte, &M c-tuqJprwnI cacmaqjt.r Ins em to
ca7y out d,,Ojm-
Ora -ding I Improvement pl.m� Review
Irjerwegg C*-mO,4 GIV.19'a will paYedto pedmm ted M"VoMS bMUN
we twouft, urde!VS4 10.4 ObW Wries am reg'"If"Is d M&I431 gvmmnmql5
0/111- WpW rrMy of air Ste tan tMid SOW W14 MaMKWMa POSUMmAh
'A'a bome M-1 bwwm±fisw md ex*erm is trupodmt Sinm SWIM il ft mpxtj 0
co
WcW �,tuast gagaspimm A=itro, W4* &WU n, f1w;
pvtsgami slag Wy urdmiarts md YWm tjmmprbrcP- e, rang -a � On
Otemas of Wff pubfic agmy c5ents m a mr,,w vdhio T� po-Av4 m to dtm we wee.
arjermut I= tr4 coWWW, dive= Mm � PeOP Wt e to pvWm a* f is cf On mjpmw mqmmd by
the City, Mam enW, mtly, v4 PMGM IN kr4wo4e a -A SAS rmemmy to efft*-PAY W"� ft W--esw?y
eKgmdM mytH eo ft C" SW b qaaa a desip p9m dmck pmcm "� (S LOO_ONft —cW-%Sfta Wd
'We Wew aW M'e WW 83 fng te 'I WiWity de4n P40n cvck W*aS by.
W
0" M&X.- mgubby appmch
ammjvlft two fo, Omre'=AGmw=f im'd fozAitivas w2h ft need hr pfaoieab-fty,
anitm*, arid effidomy
Hering a gmg Of 170 VWPAW kv ILIO AWWd arofte CAY
Oveiq W j#",N to "prow a semms dSW ptail fiWWW POWSS (D Pfflxri't kmktffs�ssr;Fes'
"gzmw of g&Adm" it mod SPOMM
tqW,ymt CWWfhrQ Cup has ft apMenm and ur4eWfirdng W mure tM bona RS 9f f.W. Lr= W N te S.* U
MaOWd Im jl� City, We Rm*y mid mkmUmd the ilqpmlmrz d Pyr it 0 NWVOI & a,3Wfrff Wry while
ra" WOM ft htgr' mistrzonts of 0* 01". We hRIM ft &KWe= aW *AOWAqO 10 Qff OMMY Md gffWidpY
exMW WA =-jTM zar&ivkm jo numt cLsticuw dewWs and err vOJW MOAV,-Y IffiTacting 1ho
O'41's &=Ms for quaRy d0s4n An dwckft.
mmager fWq"4ft=4r(A d LIM OM m6aw. ft lave. W -d qwAyof
All Van mi -41 bA VOWtO 0� ft FDA'd m
c,=, mgf.,ts f mm, the mv�m, amsWzy wO sftft mgmk the ami.,�jzm of KU or 9IpICWmm-MM. tha
ma
mm,-Ihv Wj Me deggns that may fart siaWards, TI* pmAt MS#Mer W Ma %ft ft desip
Wu�aw� Wd thegg, CjWnt if
pdaf =merts are trit Wng W�Ifassced. We �rffle b.M ftA 901 the pmom bad an
Vwk or ptVate ft pr*Ct CWMWMRI WAh a MGM MrStc 60"�a bssF�J' On t�a"M4P MWfts'
Tr,B,dtmmbm zbm etsaim )rte? Comsm" Graip S phtaooy iar4 aWiTawr of shoe we do W wmt, A
tpiw Kgnafm for - tit V) ft erhow ari pmcm-n4 Of W, mps, ptam b7mmml
as. hydmtog aM hyfte;VS takWOM aW Am— WKI ttk er#x'"HN ark OPWO-iu-b $gns aW reW5. Wbm..
V, tai y'48 40 to OMIM j` W; aws AV ft map, , -vmyco' mt 8ftdJ4*CAW Arm Romw o4m
Wej&j BW C1, f V-4WEd f qAWt.', "98. rOdA4 Sad' AM &-d dMVP Mf W� t
recommomw"m Ego p to? mhm is BSSVW'to a crOS44 OW M*W Wth OW -.40 oft pqfinq
mmaW Tft m6aed ar.44AW Of bO C=mtW fO ME PmV-d SW M'g W gif SuftBqu'&I WbOON
ccrawmi fevew and avows 10 IW OWMmf&
sd,komd dmAy tv ft sWft,&W$ OVMW OF OWSWO girchoe., WO a Copy to my SV-ff inif on
A eta r r of ftwyms mrd any Mpwfs W.;1 be Mbme *91) Pr*% +rff� Ar h f{r
V The P(anm6ar w"IfficdOM t to WIMMMO
1 d'r* W ' r are ; ori' f assst in &qbmly =TVp-w of the
goat of tffo pfw reyisw- ff romy, ft Whd -`sem Wig waftm tPdB# 9 pmvbw rrr bares Lten
&dtt&vW. Thds maefM nes fatm, pl Prr the DWVP Erv''$ Ort0, if dtOWSO that M.-' '
e W2 Mae Wh des M' W as tom. tr x ft'r pmgmss sofAar
We , : #me woew=rw, y w& ft kWomrm': pf m mwin and wMw ft stated
OV Wde rW cf ftrApm 'ams WOM cw ei*Ag Ste pwMes the wood MMW Me OMY to M*
dMign plea d to frwLVj6 Mh ft sw-V OXMIWW W knra the Qtj derrands Of SM.Rw prima
dl Psm arid r,rM.
Age, gel para sstoramfr mw.O In State arW Feftr ' �MWWVN
raw development arsd pit Fb*d pm".
U - S, Army Ow�ps 0 Eglr rs, RegbrW Board znd o0w, Std anA t=ell agerrims ftc�' In ft pwnftN +ar
*wovwum of dscwjw=y pr news. " to w s �ina�a du Wm-"th a� r�tlirlwy �a'r ww
O � 10efes 111 wawRA v [c: T= myrAte Tavi + 3 el dis�,wy WpWwns or � wTwI
plan
WerwW's aWowh woft W, ft X11 tnfcmwd al t irQr dwewbgm wd wny t Fess. V rA1
im ponvm a,' 660'g "t of a* raw'pcxm Oefl ft Mvice, 4*cT t> or unwwqe. awAWA saw
a set of Wly dwansd plos has jmraftW fiat * wo* dmly with wt yn to toir,.kft the Ofon in a
r r� t,�.�rre ra'rrr.
CAM
Ons Plan WhMk
Into the exWMm and copabirdyto 3 Blow graft f4m reWad to pmpd VIM :. C10 Eqw,
Wde kV w subOWOm, ora M*O ai#xong to a
be it Nuated to aatxraf* wotf wV-(surxwxAq pvpwfmaWa;n awimq 6wage
�+rRad-vr$,rf . cxft and pwt c=twbm wrwii,&ty cwW be wfawaderr>>ara
•aWRa MfW44 P r, 3f a 'c L fliiFtt ! � r# w . gf ' i' .
. 'am �> # a up wftn 24 Pa r e r€ f t d reef' b Eta t}rM �1��+a M to 01+0
'Z9 �
�radir,o I Improva-ment Inspections
Nis effxe 2fea
arn4m f -ogr es=r mmstw.-Vw.
r 0aft €id,'�d Oaff fmmWAWo ivy prowfts:
lo:loWd Ob Wpmmd Ssom ",o' Fbfi'uVM PION RMS and the Ws Mia!
Dis ,;6V ET MbAbM Sym ��t roWAwwft
tnumg. sw ho wmW' °a lid oWows to w&w wwoodwwd p mi ,�n$ Ii em
dR&V t, WhOdw f 1-- MOMV 040" : WW0 4vmY. wideWrS a mw� woftr* .a may, out S
s *Vied"WO oty smft -'sit p6wo =&: U A- SOW to Toviewng roWW4 k`# MWA Ons m ow Or
Of Ilm ,. we wi rem w vjbnfezLs aw r wma l 2 weelm, subseq1=1:9 cf � be rw'omd
rami W w Min t Wit,
Fire DePartment Mon Rovilowand Inspoction
MIM89 .ae r Mm, , bets l bs,4uMW to puna ire code
plata mim WW "mfr, s2mices kt Mi. Thq iota waA vamd a ft ire mde
re 9W- M$ 8 W TA d wk P WfFs t C M n O h a .a €# b ftp
9WWM4 Wits, ImPAmp W. not bW to tseW*Onq_ Urm Fiffe Codo,
is &A `V 9 a Wlh Vra Cetif&Ma FPO Pmentmi e� Asswklon. lnwwm
C"SWM9 Gr °s 00 tW 8iSO &,AhDVd 2 VWW9a6$M O thO VFC 1O ft QFC for N CftM� FfPM"
OMM"S %
.pW fgtl" WLdm at ft Rwm mvoo e4okmvft z mo, NMPmg p tea ivWw kdhV, coife 1rAwpW,ri,
h9rarwM lea q+u" cwsVcb: omft 4waurg a# Jamme a, -A mfz mov, traW7 ng Rte, ma&irg, wd &pemi
proxis•
QUALITY ASSURANC9
Uprm a d wrifea our kW =W for ft Cirl w9f %V up a bWo-faw ovoling Wt k!oy 04, sUff %)d1V;Ws
U-Jque amndmmg v"Specik"aftm mqw"w by ym" o4kow, WN wwgm*- to i Itgotm.5f Wd
spr,W mkonts ym vkvuM like o 0 kftP In WW,
(0
I 1mrs tr adVm, tw-o2Mw of our lmaonW, YMA m Abomay Wh M,
Mrd y i r, �q u e o) e r, t w d; o n t k r "4 ed r, - M Wt, n p b; t n v, d 11 me a rd u 0 MR S w F 0"I w f w e
;vj,�M and pham e m-fawam f.64 wW* in add7lm any spocW vwetb: mg rmded m a& -fm wN dmbpmrft w
�ssm- We affae rgecffid relmMog nWmaft for ft Vowdure, Vk Woe a oislum dXA&-6c b 0 m* am c5om wd
pd,W infem.►a,= as it mUm to affy wmm we poffbm We also Ovvft w4 raoinlain aexWidm bWetffra
cma" 0WO-ml 6M, pwpa and Wim Infoff flaWn ommft to Vopa manWro o -W inW44 SW Our
"nc;iI wt odmmw-,aftw ste, is 4bly tom, anording mn1 w4 edumWd mfo%im to k mint on
=;?-to-date MuOy nwOmft ag kftm2km.
,iWfs wd plan mumimm. are w4latm by ire or e -ma W arsw qmtm pwtahft, our pba
w4m,ma are alsovm4A � r vAh applicants = fs en a fm-,Woce bas:s as requimd to remte %an
mhff
tv I ss- ws. Wj o h, Vt t d if Cy W & a Wo at, s v b y b m W s p Maze d i rzJ %,A C I C a P; W. d L ft, ft 0 0 m
WoMs W roolve el cWo W4W ls!a pwdo =W4ft. w4 cw0k�*%d &xuwj% upw mowof ft
om mtw pmm-
As a ffu-, w4w WMpaq to VMMrM.-, 8qWM., M ode ref s&os In rWnWwg "', k qWded!9W in ft
r,*Mjy alwing us to rrAt-.h our pPs4* 10 5t yw exod W48,
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
As a mwflw-4,ljrr
�4ovw jf
utlv �%ZA,* w4tow,
1wemm Oxw.N,.*g Ormp dm*fit fee any pmnfa3,nord11D1Jrg f, nmc4, bLsinm oT WarkmO,,lp ir.WMN wh.-h
6&T1w- t3 ft 0')"' d ocea ma5a.
— 22 9 � '
�� ::�` tib; .-.� .��:< :':- �•�.�'� •>.:,: �•:�.._'�.-.�
PLAN REVIEW FEES
We p-opm the folkmirg feesctsdLu tot all MOW M RFP
s r expw4o :pla o dm 5c kh' r..udvs W� *w aid M W fo-0 `t ,aV:Jfvl" t
ff f hpwvmr4 man Rte:
V70%, for ftt Ilan &wad and wiv mq ed o
ftw no moo thm f.ve 1,5) cak-&r fts.
ire F
to IT o `t five ,) o0rdw da�s-
WC. m ft Aim" Fi mom item msm "'M ."- OW&M of e : vd ` ownemw
HOURLY FEE STRUCTURE
3TANDARD WMINS
HOURLY
"My
�FIW
RAI
RATE
"19tr (s:
.
.............
ii (miry "�t) .:..e.ue. ry .,.rr .r ._ ee.........-...._...._
_.. .., .:.s,.a w.ene•,,r
,,..
.�Ii'fr Il._�......._......... ... �mu .... sw err.,n:: rrr.+v....n..--,+,_-..._.._-..........._..._.. W{P.... .....w...<.....vn • .r: :.:Yr:,gMyH
g ua n.. u...m . e..< .r. , .e... Vii
gwrA am a��li �.....
` 1 41 e ............e. r............
��.e,:::n....e...-..,..................._........._... .v,.... ..u.. ..a...
r..--. .–..............._..........,
u: .... a,a erre .,. ..-..,e-25...... ......: ,..<u:.�w9
.......... .:..... .. .................
.............. _.._....... �
.. ,.. <,., ,..r......_ ..._ .._..._..»M...,..< . ... ................,.....
_..... ...W....... <.....r,.,n..
s....,...,,,,..<,,,...,..:,,.,.
...................... _�_.,.�1
Me EaMmuma
gr4 Add —11
Coll of Cod; 010m:LMITur .......
shms ap (ornate anomd AQV an Q I end amy be SW*X$ 0 MoAx owns Wdv Inju MAN Wfcky
GY0yorls-
ZJLLING PROCESS
-2-90,-
w
Convenience, of Office Lmcaftn
mstwist amu" Omp is Cw%,lmkVtY bmtl adoaml to tha UY W Q f fi ON
M, TdS CWe pM)WAy 850" 0 to qUOTJY WIQ 0_-,IMWrJy WVS U'r- k4kiy
V,MS. Vk ten @ GNVeW tmr d pmkmopss aWahb ud ready to imrroedm* to w4V
ft Cly. h*wde d&ly pck up sT4 deRmy (0 all PAM to W4 ftm ft QtY Ot 00 OW 10
ire Aktftn, we VWro* wm qmfa� SUWXWN c4a in a *VW capno Ir"" ft ClIes d Newpod BeaY.,110,
Imne Md Lake FOtK iat 10 nw, 00 a flow -
Swims tor Cura Mm 'do, be nwapW W4 semd Irm qff HufA, rl@%m B*gj:h �. Wwwo, has seveml ctsix
off=s twighw Cdftfnia� cobrada w4 NV4WO wvAg 6wft W ft ym
. am IA VIP74 -4cx" 06-
CWEM
wow
Sara Aw
W40
cow�,
m Or
W40
cow�,
1:0tgirl 4) MAL RESOURCE LOCATIONS
2 Y 127--
Awl AWOVAKUMW
01 V1 MY Me Ate&
106 VL k0 23rd
.
C
M1.a�u 77±±
IMNQ ��a �rit� �0
n� Y.� �fa�
f w**A Q Wt
gtoe
n
9"B°�:i9d n .00 ZMEM
Mak CA 15MMA
Sim 105
MW CO 0W
.%0017 Oft
EAW CAS"M
W>41_: =
8AMMI
COUNLCAUA
NEVADA
749131. RW"
9`60 sieffa Wage fid"
416 vs Rome RMwd
We ICU
Soft 1lauto
11K
_
SMAMMSOMM
316o!411601=
7020122M C50
2 Y 127--
amW% mw$ �`Vmwa5t staff. haNiM P=dirty €m PWIC Ts. NP WWM# J*
vcj"•
City of Lake 'forest
%n Ape, , tg,%,'w i nsokig Grm V t -keY �,seY
rd C061
rs ii
€i 9 t� a �c , twwvim vWK ft pity has camacted lb,
badAg am savy senws emm its EWpcfatxs ift IVA. is c M'Am ftup
SOWWSWU�Y—
bwoo sem' 3y vAh WMN dly!W' we WDYWPI 9IV Y N mai, hmqg
;Aan mviewerrs, bWd,,V HsPoda ;a Widing w.11,w fecinidan,
gem,, �kird wW . 2l a W,$ Jmd d M"r We= Is me€r%hW_ iwffms
Cum* suvcm-,
V RIM
y chw* r
V PWM T
Pmt cam
i # %--t
HVUVINs & SAF'
n
VaM d *aWpPWft SWIM
Fu£',>JI;; �Q�AKS
"tom h"titer
puak: ` v:Fedm-
U9-46tUO3
irr +r iWtaABd j4 2011 A"'1l V4e Won aft* r fir � i s: Id
o i d d?e C4
4 irr°xFr€"
p1quCts, Wo pmt cor" as Of 2ppr'vj3j I�r 4Fscgdvuq aproWs such as sle dM , PBM ald t m
Arim
t'ot m . Pim aremwa*v4 ar =TOAM0 h 2 >2y �> r it i¢ tdiaa t �
emi rif,t �`ari, ` voter q m�aruga � t PIW,.. x�.,,199, ydfobo Of M, t,Iftffle t
490 PMVdw
difAlm staff as K*. . >.i a m ru Wize d �rtm st �m&w- ' g MIA illi fBq!wzl d kyl ft .
HISHLIGHTED PR04;Z TS
Patob Center - RevrT t of toolotvo t ► pnop. h#f y, am ww' q Iiy mrsproll.
plars tDr a 243 are at 441t WnMMW Md fe$*a W 6ML-)PTma
Shss SWW ftmb-RWM V hydology ffi;2oto Muit ws4'vrmmfor a387 am
?pm� fi tt ,nnflwle at �y g'q�w'4p��Np�yW w& do#&jpS•�nY��3"ft
,(fig
City of Yorba Linda
tnWmst stn p beW M t " Of YQft Urde IPOPMW 6001ir
Apff 2010_ A d W'€: m*s tD SW groAh WO M PWNW W PM40 SW
soWom a We by epmroced. ficomed erwvafs mth a Wus or
MwowP SM tm plan Mews kr ft ft"bMe"t 00W 4�. OW fu fl
podm s pub6c wotsVW.Wn t a VMIY Of OMMIC41 OW
*�wodng pry Rmow
HIGHLIGHTED PROJECTS
Yabo Undo Mec=l office Buf ff - s ptox'l `4-�. lcm fi, el
offa sp=?:aa,,�� . r%N rfoa gr , risk f� ar and s t
imWilm—
#*� C" Soft, HWMV, $Asts VO V c#' ,;a ArmM wd Encato - Nm
m4eelw w" mom #w, Wo WTRS� IMMS1
ebmed the SVOV, aM SWPP EnSW- % fY W lhfeO WARM.
--284,
L84,
PKISLIC WOW
MNk .
PE
.�..d, 7
.,1,p4e.::�s/�4y. F� ,��7t4t
J rAzaFk�f?�'as'arFiP-v`iT
City of Wildem-ar
P?w to i=ce^ -tai* , ,h 20M, iri4 "+° k f �' oW worked on .:i' �,:) e
csba� irr��r"; t a &-4 481a Wt4oh wad m am ba$b tW conrir ng a area respnsbMas
for MY 0 Wf4mar, 'at F Itt � � t Myn � b ga% Rr4
�3fsed cw effechve aM Innuvetwe pry AV PW&V I uV.4 Wales, P' ,�jV, SuMm., W
wd wyces Vemm- d i = ft Coram Of WOMASO,
IFmTWBtm of ep, City of idm r €1n j 1, 2W& In Cmu3g +arm s created
at IngimeMed mmary system and masse M vOYWO OWD fd" .iQ Wv
Er
rwt�wafti Pilamiry
Traft r4haeraSO-mm
dF &0449 alo $4' C -q* COAAAW-V
a Povs-O. ImpOOM
Cc& EMmwxV
Wha V E64 rffl mog
'cis
"mml-lawrED VROJICTS
C"Ulm
fm*
MOW
26107.7751
r�t+p['etraikt.
Meow I T�,S PqW mirsigled Df a Tegr�jfpm Sub -lvsW Map, Zm Camp. Gemral Rae kroagdMW4 md an
ftvlrom�w' Am�MMWI tai OlWmStO Ir Tom d t o pmod bt a 61 W SMIVS&I€ l 3'WOMW
mwfty. The site ;,ew d the exlem4wof S;W3 Irrft~tMID pro
provide er rs m VIF04h W, mstrgP2s Y'
F"4Mn&MV&t r& PM*OM'Z IM Q1 IM 10&MM ft D=Msw site On WA
swmArdxqWmWWum. and I4 m, watoqtEffAygtmaAhyJmWyisludy
:,4I" awe Serw&d m d !rah t a lis ef, ft subfMm& as,
r,r ifras[rr tel
Capon : Ths volmcmmistod of a CmdejUft PWMA 0 VMOM sF.4ia V Ma VAA C"Uh, lhtW
chi° € P tri MWII blftnP teift V;9V4mSt* XUM "E#,tet d f MM a T6t�M ' PMt
mm to Sumo�I Paw"S tab 6 =nff WcW, pW06% anj 1 fro; mcm .< arsd an ErWmm
j*rww pmeldmrevew e Vm %,,�ohv msp, mnmwcW ate :Pam and �M 4 A ftOW +r 'e sense"
i Ang a a, Stay MIMIS re plcWdM to t=am ISA AvAm04y roftms M
Firms lho Wbw metres.,
jo nepsafion of its raw mra wd,ter part.. Sing tem f1�;v&ftShVb ft QY low, d Rseff 1p, a
POOM WOW t) to new W408MAnI& Interwest was able to agsAt the my Whep. newtWIC" to 42 6
�'Mtr��gpl@t, t t r;��,,,, , ,"rt��,f muir�fYts�.. yS ,,,,}}F Wcipab ��i�� M neWU mm cb � ft Comte of
Rive .YIde, Rivers* C�,rrrty MW'ar4�tR,rd mW F1'Glt�it6 wft, 013ISS,
city of 1e
tt.W.mg On, w �xQ Ldp wo s& -Jed ktW t IVB 8S MOW Off+14 SWOMO 2nd SOAP
plan twee M%i= m ft C4 e l jpwulstm 21 O. , It"W241W in 197t„ owalss
UWW a r ts ow of tft 1 gw plamed urlrm ommunwa sb ft*V O ' 'Wo
m; . Ox sx *ntmd WAn m4imw c%lr,§mm have Y'sled Mr*l&OWVe On MVM On
NurdmcO of m%hg it Tls to large c=swGW davezonmIs2 lntvwesl
ve wry Pw tliew
ve F.%�Ww� Plam Rev,"
In 2Gl 0, t v Oly sslv� tnwst CwmkhV GmuP to �e eqgirwr p�an cterA
Wyk= W tie n 4" opaMr' =*e of, mAqws irdudm providirg ra M t
conte emwwoft W.Wls wyjl We &j vAh My st i tD mmpWe t � a of
WopGft. we sm &arW vi -t, %T*y wAaw of dnivago otam ter mnsistency
Clq ettOVWWIS Std ,, ��t� iii O pt � i y t�muW
tq Road MVmo -= 'W oldeWW rimy and Blom, e
V ftnegge -tom of grading, drainage, e n conW, wd strut pt� M. rept
t/ GPS Park Arai e1'i - Rovtw of Mww Ron wW 'Crest sp►:� ft
hydra0m wA hgdrok)gy mparts tr a rut 130 We MUW 'f'CW,119111' .
czatict:
uncMutla
I l l $ MAK
�qst �4-
t C-pw f
City of rastvale
'rte cws�"'q etup c- d a Wo of FNM fasolov In ft WiNm *1
e. =nt anj rest effecive makes to ft neWy ii=Wmted Uy e FASNA
som= fmiidw, (1) fta., ",end kBy dab wNn seRfed as
ft baWs itf caffm1mg wMw ma X10 VI of Eastvzla, )
nt and va" moMoft 0 povdinq Pu I-Naft, a &j9dirg
<t''4<3 muss trar 4 ,ftne OwM of gt tgft
&,,m h=pwop of tit Cwlti to Eaoale an July 1, ENO., srAors t'm%4WQ GQ €W
created and Op;WmMed r wsWy SY$Wr,$ Pfm&ws W P;w't
r 'n ;aft err erre
ee ii c"ws
Pubkwar" tit
#" F--,gk ng twirl Sao:
NPO — tr M Wawl CI M*I K&I ry
orw sa
Dav&pwAEpglrA-OfAq
andAMIE OMS
V Sm4 Durst AdHnls°. Jnrt I SiMloo Ude OwWa7m
Man RuOew, W;S"S WW Pel"Tfll '? B?
ve Gmqm4hic ars *$WnS
foA
HIGHUGHTED PROJECTS
mtl SeI
' w bra, wd s ,gym cif PmVlo d"OPYrtmamwi1s 4%" m5L
The r - KB Hsm - A e, ga. i d rwe, Warms withf, No h s;
1hp, lgr t wo Imme =mte* lauwJmd m #m. . tr OWnW&m =muu sifm ft
Wjzog doom, tm, an. ?_ tads 10 F ' larp rata ft'p, R .R, paek& famA
dJf ` g -C ' 1 1V %wmftlm rxb a5 twAlOss Wim` bwW3,
; b rat* systa st sire 1 irE rs 9' onMe ! ` h a cot ' st ta�
vAU n tin oxtdo, a kay r=psr t 0 smog.
A 20 -am wmnWr has bwm panoe�sd el f fid' OVIA ` 'ObPM 10 P v 3 suqmd
m rdmurAy. art by e Cris st tPhon, M.
- 2S9 —
Capt:
Bob Vv, Rm t
Gey fsr
*o�e., CA 91 752
SWIM-=
A MTm
we fd h1w to, exwmo= 0 wiler, sow, did slam dr�ello tft* site W4 "hal
onpomnam have also won at the NTirr.-`;q e b;ed,
Ewsmtj Stove - Puke Hmm - A 51 dwnti2l pmod made p of 2N wins. TVa
PUN
w&s InitaW �,, IN Owe,,
y of k*jWe aW k= ropped I)m pr=ss to ft�e
..... ..... .
the C4, wd InL-� pmlde a 7s�gAm, fir re SpORMA Omm Of
ap=mey 3 ruft fTvn sutmt&lDf=,ps aM Plans to aiM of the map arA
wasi-Mwogmemmos by the My CmoW Cure has bwn hUed arAvtWes
f'MW' M I
PO 'WffOfW
a,10 ISM 9 Cl Off$RO WAK
safe mmmrvt d kx;9 &W ?"knal tmft.
fts&aic Swth - LvMz, Gmup of Compnies - 60,0M squm—,W Weed Un Wde�
Odt*iV s%w* Nkllmits, lam MI wd Chffww, w, t5.3 a= at to efffm= inb the cify. [,-npmvwTw,:s
��,vj-uft MW
two maim emw (0-.WM) svm%
City of Pomana
Int,2mst,Coraul" GW begw serAV ft My ct Pwrom Int Om 160,=g to
SE%embu 209. TmditR=4 a F0 seffce, Oy, Powra exartred a number of mst
sawN� s�°V-40as imkMig cont frog far servkas diM had hisbmarq bwi prcy-; �--d b,4
in4mm utter st Consulu-4- Groep su=wf,;',y twslaned W buMing ala s;1.
mmes fr yft City's In-hwim slaff aid irforrmMd mw fitealmilmed Womsms aid
promdims. Ttg-- charge msSmd In a htimr icl of wrVxe fir ft cilys custamsT W, a
sVnIfgW, mst sm6np lo ft cflc� We cumendy pmVde ft falbvAng onsite serer:
V Alan Rv&w
I/ PWM2 Tu&nwan
Bwft hisped'M
BuNft & Safdy Ctde Camp&,2w Ran Ra Yfew
F=v" Abdwwit F-Molcomil
RoM rAunfaf SmAW
Adma'WWW8 SVOM
0311MIL,
Vwk LatmVeD
Nw9q"wlt Msdw
W91M. I:rm
lPlfgMW4@1$ ,004'
yye�� City
o � yell 1} g a {� p�� fg ��$� ��]t�µ� y }a��q y�
in 0�1a 'fe;�'I1 �R14 as ; Fo � proms, 1hee C 0 W, setae d" li��/'tYLL'�3t
Ccisdbnq Gtwjp b Wldw.;; ptan &=k ate IrlenveVl has OM$ 0
Tb
2d Tasdwbal aWAM Md (eM%W pts r-R tc Mal Bell En 0 rOMW
;resew w,,qm c�r,M wlh r m6y WWy ffwMW ard ft eWM CAY M€X.<
b pmvide erjONWM Knarcm In Dwmbu 2011. Our Slog Why pi t rI'D 1t
we wredy ft ukwno u Offq'bSari-
m ft4�ew
efw4wing
.ftee MvWx"O
cwanxs" Mangle% ele
V OMSMAftn ObSMOW
��€iy art
t
mpW,3A-mrestirros m for pil slaff;wed U to MY of CWR Wim.
Tim D*-Zmurs, PE, CBO, AICP
PrtncipaWn-Charge
CONSUMNG Tim has ivved ti a rmmb*F*f WRdtkMIn the fields of c entfttfts, MWWOOI
GROUP putft, works, current and advnmd Manmq and bvldft saf" adminstraVort and
W. In 10 ew ffis t 11 rp , r 6 On Ins pw1on, aw b4 served pubk sector aenh as in-house pubk *Wks &TeCW,
city en r, vlaftng 0000r, ass6taftl 04 aronew and Wil&pmg aftial &W hm
w, ved prWate sedor diene as a pr*Pd mat5 and &49t' MWI%mr
IDUCATOON His baftmrad aaw ImIudes reWnslNlfty for lesdft vW mmagft ttw WUMN)
Kwas EM"Mm derivvy W a wriely 01 MuMOPA MIM0WMcfLs tQ AumeMus cWes thfvu*wJt
t?Wm*v of ro DJW tau sera J ?� t�
, Cz.,jf0rAj& He deditued hjm.%0.r to wming the r lenfs! aeds in e
"'BA; f fhp#WA is wotmi* vnj mait effective and efficient nunner povqwe.
alvmm OMI 0mv. nm �aS ayt" s Ivie e gpff JvKe x, n perwa 14 p ro v;d 1 ng mu m I d p I C On tr4t*. servftes to
Mmmun4ks throughout Sfttheem C411fffn�, He hRs PeT,50na1* 50 ".d as Pubk
Waif$* Dirac ors My Enjilnetv, Deputy 01V Fj,4,rvt-r or A-*5o.vate f -,neer for the
WImming CIU&S.'
mm 2012 - ftesent
W4domaf 20"- pff-WIM
pbrno" 2006-2009
It t 9 4 ST it A T 4 0 N S Los Ajamitas 202-2006
Yimca VAIW 7001-2007
Son Gabdet 2001-2002
Palos VeMwa to MI - 2 cm
vWAm54hW cha EP&M HkMen MKIs L9M - 2000
smW r� Cnhf&vva '14 T aakWa Park 199v
0:ek4uo" I Fwuh* Palm Verde$ 1981
er 11W. he;hx?, pipmorially satedas auddimg Offidal for tM foRnmeg cies.
mm 9mma 2cm
I M6 Miss OR Vito
Icc cpmw aumtag m�r I fimt In.jd&,,n W15
pagas Vcstdm Matas 7- l
PR049CT
ItIMMAMA CfWvWWvaxt Cmtract Pubrk War%s MrcrW
0104119 OH a% 200 -OT nt City of Wildernat
�Wm-un Pok WOU Auom=n
JAWA%) Publk dark*. taor I MY knalneer
2006-2M city e Formon-A
TYm &erved as PuWlc Waft Dittuarlaty rep4r,,ma
dimity to the OtV ManWr. Charged with vverM rtWfl"Pty far ML*M;?;Mg umd
dIrm,k,P,g the mgirieerin& pub4 wwks and builamg safety tA4Wmns,'fIm fomsed an
em&ring thfa vm0v fmpftmentjvaa *f the CAVS cawtag Impfavemml pr mal and
the m-structufft the Imilding safety dMilon. Depirtment -and budget
mufted in the �Svcm%fvt lrnp£mpnta0on of vtemly S2 mIllian in annual aperational
swAngs.
srnWen*-ntavaa of the Oty's S250 mKlieri Capital Imp-rawment ProgmmiCip)
and its mte than 350 proWts
V Fstabli*mmt of a Traffic Committee
Dped Oafs Marketing Parra wnhip Program
lmWernenmtionO, Zbvec, In L*%AnWJvC.MV
r? Q t -
D". op gent and uyvnng of Fundin, for more than $3 vnIVIOn of shovel featly
praom for 4nplementafion giant the fedtra', SUM -AS progri m
AnaW%, VecificWWn & Wdins f*?, $1 wAtlop c*,,qe,.)ct lor.sjFeet v-*mpliag wcl
INTERWEST pzrk an aftematNv to Jn4wuse MMun4
CO�ASLLT�NG
r
3ROUP C=tract OW �flaer
WWW. I At IF WO r4 I of W A18MIU*
Smevml; as ft Gay's Contrad City F-npJneer.IIft(S a=*MprA,hMeOI*, and
=Ogftmenh have in tided the dwelopment of th--v Traffir. Commissionos Wieies
aftd prmedures, wNch oftabled tCity to effeON61Y -3PA WWMVY rMCNf'M M4
Med
IA asues. He also developed project r*pans fet mad and Mw 6041
ntr. a -rd *vaj su V-enfU I r4 sKu M& appm xarately $1 m I Man Iia IN m di ng
tftrwae,� the Orange County Traw4mrtatfon AulhotW-5 Co"kbJnM Tranqwrtalion
FVR4,.ng Program- Tim has served in a number of capacities In thoo fiekh of cW
engl"etring, mantoal puW.1c wafks, vms aad advanced Owner ng and buA&ng
me hjs for di" as In,
hwse pubf� waft direopr, planrgng d*eav,, assMaht City epenwe. and WMWng
.Ind ftf, WVfd VivAte mW clients as a prG)W manand derma
caffulm CRY Wnew
2W1.2W2 Town of Ye = VaIley
Tim soved os Contract (!TV Inonew for gals $aft Berniludino, Graily city and was
res nslVe for the tatneeting Wctivides lodudirt?, "rod OeWIOPmCrA RC)AM,
Fte5Went Enoneuing an Highway 62 Meifian "Mproww, At PrOjM—S, a! C-00TWP.
"lit n, anapmemon federaffyfanded roadway last-prow-ment
pm,evs, p;ro*t minapemeat and rest -dent englamemg on the t2liforflia W&Ome
meter Prolfi;4 dwOapmntand review 01 two MV r*44W4V PMIMS,
vl�
land O&Wopment Review
F,c4JdeAJ Ex*-neerinE an Mqhway 62 Median ImpTwoment Pfeeth
M Cmntrac-, Adnzlrgttmti" and projecl m..?na;;v—m"t on f�Ry Furded
RtWdWay Unpmwmr-nt Prale,03
Project ManapmM and R&dent FngkwfrV�g an the Callfaata liffelcorne
cenw pra'4ed
i vepm".t .end r ; of two new roadway projiMA
Co.nr= Public wmks vkedm I city Enakweer
091-2WO Oly of Palos VeMes Eswas
Prinef.pid accornprNsAmnis and ads 4ftmf M4 inesuded. Men Pavenrent
management _NVstem, d7afted ti v Wils d Geolon RP*M pre SF Prm4ded
proms fnj#rm-drg on the Wea ZvfAa "xp�n Tarn Raadw,&V Rtvalf Pre" t,
W.anWmeaq of the PrMtapion of the Traffic alrnkq Plan, CionvauCtIon Cantlact
-L-.v, Capital MtpraftMeAk Ft� r6ng 1, pt e tatlan,
Man-agemenT, Plan RvA n and M M n
',
GukUw on Hiles Development and Gtadln& Rx WwqIP4 lands x
Maintenante Management, and FmIlMity Studw,
vDewvpment of a Pavement ManWrnent SyAOM
�s
v' Drafted the Svi� and d GeWpa Re0ew Process
v, provAed Qpa
-it
PrOJEC
of the Preparation of the Traffic In Flm
Comiruman Contract Managefflent
Plan ReVew
Capital I rn-provemenlPlanning and IffiRlemenw-tIOn
V Gtgdanc,2 on tflItsWe tWvelapment and &ading
Z01 2- -
RpadwayaredLaredscapeMainteni3neeManamemenI
d� FoaslbilEty stud
iN7ERWtST canuvao RuWmg Offfdal
CONS L 71 N G 19911-20W City at Palm Verdes Estates
GROUP "ram was frastrumenW in the? fit`?lexw%: it ,'Op itrgat and Im r. rat�a�«Iosr +
www. Iaa: eaa r W e S a S T P .17.0 M CIW$ first romputer aun, t , g f 4rm,it system a3i&. Wde. autorwWd Wtkft of
all pornIt affW.W in th-e tjjy- ate alFo Ip4trurnen the Oty obtak fmg eR i Wmmt
rat,4M given ao 0 b�4flding doanm-rnt ?.rndw ftn aullding Cade Cffectwness
frziding SchNLe (SaGS1, a PatfdrR'saa Inwranca bew ratIop, sptem.
Def t &�A fzAplementa'tl of the �iy°'s JIM CompvWr BuMM Pert
Sys rre whkb pTwAdes as tomatd traMnS of all pert OCCML + Iro tift QY,
Obtalning the h4helt xatf &On to a buq&nS department u er the BuNtRaS
e Effntwam Gmdf-gSchedule (OCEGS�, a naWmal insura h*du"
rd -ting system"
C'On Sunding Omdal
219's Oty of MMian tiJ o
71M s Interlraa iiding Of-,Ywal durFng the tmnsltmn of canto S Idi r2$ &
Salty SeMM fa'OM g ttWT =VaCt $ervl a prtoo er. He directed the
Lmplementation and cul of the &rtffMreS PQ*d+ and Pr=4UMN, the
lrnpiernerrtat o,n of a new computerized pemft Irwanct and tra lrlr, MISWM, Wd;;g
and tr"btlnin of Sown rwkv staff Members, plan duck procedures and caw-dinat4n
math t" Planning nMent.
_Zq:5_
Greg GodWith, PE, CBO,., LEED AP
Man R*Waw U."I"**r I C:*rM*d MOdft Mogul I LM AP
INTERWEST
aTeg bring 26 yevs of bul4leigdewtment adnimistrahan,
CONSULT NQS
Oan rgmew and strpctura�� design. Serving AS a bulldirq� Offidal fit
GROUP
th -at the " librola tw svitfuly arnolfles
;ueadktions , raushe Me V, CA
WWWAntlaqw6a tot'O'40M
castamer serWce at evwy level—the Wf to evceptkmal WWW4 and lafety
Ing edwAtton "k partfzlpailcm wfthi3* key indwArV
wv�ce- Has wgo,
arpnirations b:ings o high 1,eM of wdie Itmmk-fte to -ow'c3ignts.
B Q T SPF-CJFIC EXPER32MCE
pWM1W'2 mn PW4�vw WAWV
aulwmg Owww
(SIrWiwal %Y*oVQ
2011D - Pio tit intf-tweg Consulting Oe up Lns Angees
M-0 AR
b"alldifts
coord.inaftnzj�d quAfty ctaftl of Al buildiop, adm[Wistration for va"us
IF 0 U CAT 10 Pf
cr�enM if r�anajf$ a',] plan Tev�ew, in rr, trot counler ioMl code
abatmera stMm, Pr dei diml cam and M*iNtaffze an a vaTWTV code
UMV0MVep� 2M,
rexttd 1&5uei- Performs Viral &,l reView fOr a VWIM-'s lurMictim.
fi euroMreaoraf
DaTMIng & Safety
2OG4 - Present Marais & Assadotes I InAne
A &F Qj $ 5 T it A T 19 N I
Rmpvmftfor the day to 44Y over aN deparuywnt administratiaT4
it 9 A 7 1 F 14 A T 10 M 3
up"Won and marketiM also =duUed qua Ay contrd, plan revlews
stf'otu'"l Effofte."
i3rid. %Wff tra�rlig- .Se rad as the interim bi;Odiog *1M,041 for the Otey of
%4e P/ AKCWp I UOS
Gilroy, Wg%We, and khe Deputy 11,01ding Official for the CitV of MaOiu,
End
Gutfts also ineoded,trawl to H;srrW regional offices to MtV VAO Staff an
$Utp of tofwrka I MASS
a regu4r hasis. Reoommt n4ed p4% 4nd *bicctom. assisted;n the
d"Wgpraent of and impkt6m"t pdjdft and procedures 1v City building
State at Who I W03
inspecti*n and pt an cftg&*ngactMtles, Prepaft*4 the BuildialDivislan
bud.jet; aWfj in W4vt implementation; pants to 10 thkI. f M "ca, %I of
O121
S:Tunw4i 9VM, -
RaCA 1-4* 11 6014=1_0
o 1*
additional funds r -d for stoffin& i?w*-dW,7K-At, materials, and.wppAWS;
Ptt-d
the aMireved budget- PrVW&d k0ormation % bid1ding Owner%
the puWc on buRtfing reguMtlaos i9nd toile
requirements, Twp d tW',nq4i-Kps and wrnoalnM
smw;o mov.,#0 1 26M
P'w"W"I 1W. Key
2001 - 2 M% RortWnan ?x 4e r) Santa Ana, CA 97705
JDowlaped and managed an offidvnt bUA&ng mortal review process.
supv,-Wgtd em%AWK-s enaaged ii P -,',,.e revie-w of bund -mg $3n-5 for
cc-, t4w R?MM Oftwal
e sq pi with the califsma sultding Codes and [ ordina=es.
Maintained pubfir relatlaft biRM-fM th(- fitm aft! cuffent c0n.ttatt dtk,&
Wfth tf'40-d%iteM and
Er twed Customer senke tOA =, M
whasn ere ertgaglng In cons' , Tutftn VA -ane OMMO Cities. Wrote
3 fag P*Wtial contracts for Nr MUM 5
and teW"ed propom! hdi m4drig
contf a a plan th§--.k sepAces,
ION - 201 RKA CM1 Elioneem, ftz, I W$riuL CA
sulwowd =1 =rdinated permAt review, apolzation rrview and code
enforcement actiyltjes fw aP construriJan and cleWopment; evRsured
nkV iii I
Aespo%dAe for administrative acid technical wwk M a3xMWcV'4
direcUms aaWfun of the .Plan check staff at tsae Mange County Ofte,
P.-cwided ser�,si and tM*q for the tedmical amd derkal sufa<
Ae ewed glans Ealy complerx in flatare due W Ming ,Uhj K o'
stroctuaral systems that r'eWalred wary detalled plan revtew, WW*d c:�osely
with archhects, epp)nom and bcrJOS oftOs to rhe hallenal
' rcode issues. ViroU reports and commentjP4 to W4ft
or'dinzin es or kVslavon on lam and State lewal.
Envo v
ice, 1998 Oty of MnVic% I los Aneeso CA
Foamed, screened, and r ewed carnpl pram, and
er n—emm,g file for =nmerrJat, industaial, and ,resWeatlal structure
tonsvucri , afttropoft repair, tte olitli p-, =Vf or proposed new uses
of prim M ands appurWAant MftreS to dot OPe thVe iMI UrAce
th build ng codo and related, 4m, arri nancM statutes and Indust
slaodards. ft4romr4 eroncwmg computations and anaPos of complex
plans and spedfkaftni for sc ip'llan€e W1M spe"Ied afew € f the
buildit#s fie_
x e&nal
I"$ — I_nternatianal CanfemAte of guilding OffI 4 h
csp l 4"e for resriewIng plans For structurat.and life safety ccde
rrnpliaw, for ararmus luA5&4throughout the flonhwest un ted
States. DevetDpedevspomroees to Wilftg aft ials teQueZing Witten
4mvrp-reMions to the tfnifdim BuKdft Co ,Wro Wai-nirg w -in frr*
i. ca,a ser airs vW ledured an v0ous cade sub .5,
Pim Cheek Wrneer
t 61 C ty of tos Angeles Ws merles, CA
itesponsi for mnAt- ing plans intended fat pL�wjt; 4 r�irin iarr a>
to the buildi , and comprehensive =70ng wde. lemred on teooftiing
unreinforcW wwonry WNW& WaAmd for fie fallowLeIg diwislam within
the Departrretnt of Building and SaW. Kan mak, Pubric Corm*, Z=WX
tarthquake safety, and Research.
effi nt, ~Ive and esiultzWu wAew of &, ns and E meet el
taya < position teq uir extenslva contact WithCity officials. City
JL
MaTwSement, moats @f other Sowrommt ag"es, department heads,
bct ld,,nS contrwoq.% bameowne4r. anti general pul*:. MI -feted
f f$ t
pros+ Woes of tide b it i aa4 r ted des, laws, o?di to and t tes
x
CON Cf t I
;moi fifer wa`ih nsAaft engin w s, ar it ts, chem AM ntra rs
GROUP
t€r re n,,que5"ns posed or a"xfrom review oaf plans, sperhWuWAS
, , .:a ram i $ o a+ ►
and -enoneering &ate. Pedcffftwd field ins Ilan Gf camom stn=axes W
prq,�em fbt cGrnpl4nce Mth pe its arA'apOil� Wildsa#g, WdftE
dawmvtts Wings and advises cantractm of arty dib epandes fc vftd,.
r e. d as acting i6 1 n O f -ba€ in the cities e, L H6ra Heights„ La
ter,
pompe, La V&ft, Desert Hot ;prinip and W$nut:.
nkV iii I
Aespo%dAe for administrative acid technical wwk M a3xMWcV'4
direcUms aaWfun of the .Plan check staff at tsae Mange County Ofte,
P.-cwided ser�,si and tM*q for the tedmical amd derkal sufa<
Ae ewed glans Ealy complerx in flatare due W Ming ,Uhj K o'
stroctuaral systems that r'eWalred wary detalled plan revtew, WW*d c:�osely
with archhects, epp)nom and bcrJOS oftOs to rhe hallenal
' rcode issues. ViroU reports and commentjP4 to W4ft
or'dinzin es or kVslavon on lam and State lewal.
Envo v
ice, 1998 Oty of MnVic% I los Aneeso CA
Foamed, screened, and r ewed carnpl pram, and
er n—emm,g file for =nmerrJat, industaial, and ,resWeatlal structure
tonsvucri , afttropoft repair, tte olitli p-, =Vf or proposed new uses
of prim M ands appurWAant MftreS to dot OPe thVe iMI UrAce
th build ng codo and related, 4m, arri nancM statutes and Indust
slaodards. ft4romr4 eroncwmg computations and anaPos of complex
plans and spedfkaftni for sc ip'llan€e W1M spe"Ied afew € f the
buildit#s fie_
x e&nal
I"$ — I_nternatianal CanfemAte of guilding OffI 4 h
csp l 4"e for resriewIng plans For structurat.and life safety ccde
rrnpliaw, for ararmus luA5&4throughout the flonhwest un ted
States. DevetDpedevspomroees to Wilftg aft ials teQueZing Witten
4mvrp-reMions to the tfnifdim BuKdft Co ,Wro Wai-nirg w -in frr*
i. ca,a ser airs vW ledured an v0ous cade sub .5,
Pim Cheek Wrneer
t 61 C ty of tos Angeles Ws merles, CA
itesponsi for mnAt- ing plans intended fat pL�wjt; 4 r�irin iarr a>
to the buildi , and comprehensive =70ng wde. lemred on teooftiing
unreinforcW wwonry WNW& WaAmd for fie fallowLeIg diwislam within
the Departrretnt of Building and SaW. Kan mak, Pubric Corm*, Z=WX
tarthquake safety, and Research.
- 2q (p-
Anthany Elmo, CBO
Project Manager I CeTWI-ad BuIldIr-B affi=lal
Tony has 32 years of Mun>tW ftildin$
OROUP
admintgratian a --,d enforcement of buliding, zaffin& haad usfftg amuni-ciWE
coder, W 4TI, rtmmand fmpwlo;n, With aw 24 years as a W*fing Offal"'p
hTlg-,gs 0(per*, exp-,r;�MW '4nbladgpt pwpw400n 4-11d rmt-nNnance,
pewnneef ssupienAsion aid )fine p=edwres, to ond Matra, --t
M*W11=% buftna department fnanwment and orpnita-zim acrd
tDUCATION
it MMwIftnt-
FLwru* Qvy Wwft&� CA
PROJECT spF.C471C VXPzR$t"CM
*w- Sm-wdino, CA
t� SuElffirts Off kiavauftiffs C
�-4emf;MMI coftzm= at
2M - PrmAt anzfrwm Cwz4ATIRS ar'n-Up
I W-hWer, CA
Responsible for t� e of a aAdlrlZ.IrJ Safety p4n FtV.,aw,
CWWWA ftmdr4 Cad" wMW
pe-m-Ininga-4 inwecton pdides wW MspeCIW4 Pok�les and WavMures-,
devclop mant aiW ptivate communitV QutreAch; Mweft','O reach
prqyam; rfvenipe grt"MIjtIk& tw,�4ngend repo?tIng pe1civs and
a-1 6 9 S T A A T 10 14 5
apprating krudget procedures.
If ar-.4Jra5N alp- rnMary 20II,Vw-qty C@un*I*f
counel of A
, 0njfeeapp *;ntpd T*rty toi thepo.Otion of Acting City Matin r.. M A01N
cem" Dumog mtw
City manWT he was mn4amihle for the daily managament -of the Gly
CAMww'5w*w0 Twaing
wn�lt.l the long tzrm, Interim City ManaSer wal,- itis d.
f of Rewid
2M -.-- 290 irzAtornia Swe Parks DA-partm-ant
A F f I L I A T t 0 N 5
Omm4on cm t4w Ante'ope Vat XT Historical mdwi MAiwum ShVcturW
Tev afi" t a 'e H 1*10 ric 0 trus Pa, rk Arner�=As Wt h D43,) "ties
C004ft S0014% Cftk?A itALWI
wowlw 11925 -ftp
improven'xht projff-1, fm the Unfcff fl[2 State Parks Department 8% a
wAa Pmt ICK At 1 2=-=3
c+�ltant Inspector of R=rd,
CAM Ro. 6? F 4 M'P9
DiftmT Code C&"IPI-M=e QMUVMM
C&k,W WAdWg � Of ttM V4PZ!r
2007-200 sufm ViWnas North America
Served as a consuftnt DMS[on Wrww in Southern Calftroia dl%ecti
CAM TMAWS WAfft* M&M -M
rnan4j ng plan deck; inWctlm staff augmergat{ 0A and VOlea
IM -2M
m a n a Se m L, n11 o I w, r a t i a -M 10 T. n I a m a r 0 us I RY a A d., c 0 un' W � t 4 R& d 19 t 10 n 5 -
Oft*. fr*Q&*m AmdSmoi
pfftvot 1 =4-wo
Mractor of ev"Osard Way
CANS WA O;IVW Q0 KX i IW -IM
Iwo - 2007 City of Tem la
Fig&I zutt4ing Official esta blishin$,t the SuAl' Dj, prtment flar new efty in
no 50"
19M. ReVonslblw faT the enfarcementaf al -I aPAM&P bultdft-fel4ted
t4maw awd t 2me-INM
ind municr.pa.] codes. ilufude Dwes*ftbf'Ce
EnforwMe"t Dlosion, Public couOter, plan ifewew' permit issuance and
Adv,Aarf B*w
piWams, Add-40M*f, resPit"Ibir s' -IU12's ftc�u4r the
VIVO TWI*104a
prepa.-ation of to o?dtftfKK, prWration anki managemeol of
1-4b"M$4"W'reaffl t 702,
dtpartmt-nj budVL
- 2q (p-
Balwins oFffaw
19 - 7-1M CAY of gess
RvWaids for the enfarcement of all applicable biuffdit-related and
INTER' IST municipal cddes. WUM lftnWclion per*onne4p act ash Enf0r€ :fit
IC-ONSULTING ad Awr, rvulew plan, prepare CauneM reWrts, dMs1oft Wlftrl-tP Mde
GROUP acid,=,e Department Head dutits in hss absence.
Wits 6,2waaLCDM OuNT09Cffkbl
4 m 4985 city Of Suntom
Wiper n oMraw of the 80ding itMAr tm, ruble for all field
Inspections, budW, preparatim 94M vmftw, Wde intWPrftaV*n, Pemift
issuance andira ,, cnrnWa€-nt prorvftkne W&Tk dw0y aaoith the Fire
mwsbal, Code 15olori<trwist, #esiip Review Committee and CAV Arwrn .
SuNdIng and Zonf lf�v ar
2982- IM MY of 11 Nerside
Duds indWed feildenti-a3 and comm er€ial buildiot 0,umlsatg and
rne&s; mall inMlon, 2*Wng Inspection and Code Enforcement fct m.al
com.plairst promstng MtouiRb CAV At fftey, ri nWV MWAY rewt
Preparation,
Project
ntt�t
1979 - M1 Matin 501wers
Supe? Mised aM phaws of nkw riWdenlial tract =WuMm irc1udir 8
offsite er, starm drain and iat:%lity'nstaRatlions, onsitevarIft
W a clan and finish of re.0i Pial �wUSW%dwdULM i0f StAxontractar
t#Mttvity, mamthgy status rept a -A same purchasing riz dep,:
luPd titer T'ra /M& ming frapectue
1977-1979 CAV of Rive de
Building wnsp i##r Train IDiae &A.911i R tn�r, am VUT of trainin
In the 8ullding %parVnent apmftn and f i Wspe&on. One and 04w
half year.5 of f j�Adenttiar.and cwnmerclaI bul'�til aPS p;u rnWr4 Impection,
housing inWft-Van and 'ft ns Co4e erftr iemt, war i% ctasely vAtb
ty Attomr3y, ptml . issuan and plan ems.
Jeff Thomas, CBO, CA'Sp
Plans VExaminer I Combleat lan InspeCtor I C0xffffvd Access
INTERWEST s3mviaHat
CONSULTING
GROI�p Jeff has more ftn 2$ Veafs of wwtrurton exp fence i,,-,,rhtd[aZ 35 Vears as a
with tncredlWe knwMiedge of both wxW and rwal frame strojcwres
and the pocesses �-n Wrl& &,ey a3v Wilt gaff has supe 0, % of the
pumKis!"'g aM
�mvdidn& and aversvft Construetion.
y PARSV = V074
Jeff Wiveseffeah" aerowthe4wrd wft whitem en&neem, dahWepvs,
Map VaSeI -
cantTarmm �wv offWak a -,W clients, w"p.1dw1v bdring to
4.Ww C-Lwv� AWM4ff0V I WO compftftn. ler. Mu been an 1COCM wrdried billding inspmar since 1992 and a
IL EC5 � I I I At 9 0 NS general contrac2crunce :949.
C Ex'r v$;; CAT � am S pRoor"Or 4pfcopla VxpSft1#N&&
sulkft OfWal I Senior RvO1� MspeMr I Wans EmmIner
Aae W07 - Resent wimmst Aura Cw *up
j W4V L-A W d "I
ftV
wAtxmdwr OMM 22
code &-$*A amus4s servim, mmmeMAI andtesfd*404
wap-alon, ptan-S ex-arr"in'.-ni; for omnlT= cifiet in Sauthernr C�tifdftg,
aJ M'd"M kvw'ar DMW.-- 10 SenT*r GaMo g frsp*Mr I ftans DwWw I OaWy StAdIng Offida,
V-4' W&vj� Mns Lmm---et 2W5 - 2007 Bureau Verilat
ep. OMM& R S a p iiiti �ndud',- commercial and ressWential inspection. plans exwvfninj�,
xfc-ombmaw Iftipmey and 8tjVdi--Pg Depiartwint Man.apr for tft� CW &Laouna ftuel, CA
1 OMMO
lnwodw MultdIng Inspeder 11
ca6-. I dsfislfi��w zow - 705 City of Palm opt
I Mslfs-fs RespansWr*m i,'ndude envectlwi of new and reraadeW construtf-an w insure
KC wttAmw wv'wt carnplianft *f the Wifamla sullcrin& PlwnWmg, PA-Khaw, Electr4ral Cbdes, and
1 -ASS appftzWe city ardfn-wtf?s. Dulies also X wded hap-dift 4 vadKy of InvaZzations
vk wWch, In sewtal it -pra&--e cases, required rnV rzprmenti rt the 04v 10-Suw1of
I amtk'*�" rourt
Mg -12w## t% LTMWn" UN
10MIES-0 GeneralCoaft-ctw & UpeeRdwWoM
MC PAmwng wimeftf tj�; FishLwOrvelopment Inc
Rmm#ble �n Wd fto on-slte congrueJan mann went; effecfive;y &:bedule,,
UK P"W(MM IRWOV 1 am 1jr-p ft MCMWOT and NWtt d,1qvoelt ftam suTt to fin4b. M.xt,9fAin buftets, ;vacess invoices
cAmc ceAff*4 frwgy pw4 WMiftw and camral ovffbead costs. Duties abo Include rr.WftS 40y Written IPPOns aP4
v.4wwhfg's tw I MWI.0'10 Cooing ani PfLues Of work for camputer en".
tAMt CvYffued Eperp Vbm �"mlawr
A-1=3
V'Idal G.41 0355M
CASp-QAked AftftW.W 5WO"
Pa
ce'laffte Genvixi CA", a&" Innis
P It 0 F � 5 6 1 ON A �
A Ff � L I A r4 0 N S
vX0 ffel'44,14 xC cmxwa valkey
'CoWgf el Ch')xFM4A' WW4
— 21CTQ —
CONSUOING
GROUP
www. 4 n tis *w o 6 Ptfo, ops
t 0 V CA? I* M
Roger Pate SE
Project mm"Astir I $bwvtw4d anstnVOT
With more than 23 years Gf experleme In svucturaa design wA plan
ov-*ew, Rage, Dings considerable dep-th and knty&Wp to any prole
Roger has desWwd znd Pred Plan Im"Iew Ser*mn f of MWU-Um SWel
an -d 4snr Kes fa V&n1p, a% well as we--4ory structum UP.54ftS
SIF ba
, KwEm4p, timt and mam"Y ft�bmws VPUUOS, WS design
expWen,ce ln4u1 vjm*, commerrlat and indvanal lv*eds, rricro-
chip ri�dmWan Wlftilh, pWAW ptnt RKAAAtms 90d MUM-famO
,esldenaa? proocts. Rages "ppMtt conbribules to tht Succou and safetV
of 40 pfolects-
LK *" 1r4m"Xh%
AVW14 af
PMOJL7CT SFVC§FaC EXPERIENCog
1961
Swftr Stnafturdl
Present 1,,,1enmest Consufting Group I tallfdm6a
a I ta 9 IT A A T 10 N S
I a 7 a$ 1.0 AT 10 IV S
Fvfew% stfucuffal plan TeOrw frac COM- mercial a?)d re-"Wenual
con-Strurfion for MAICIPalMO& Re4MOble W the PtOdUCUW4A*d
Stak of &M"Rta'? Saw
performance of office Includmg mintiOniq emma rtlativnsWps. Mies
CNOMM"A fn &teffft
ew k0egoe pwwming wwwal plan reviVV4 for Iftusmal, mra-merde
Swe OP wr%b, 1 CL 5f &05
tMidentl;31 proleM.
Sm n1mW1 F*nmAr
Senior Smdural Enomw / Alam Examlncr / Branth ManAw
ltmepe. CgWanga. MI I SE U46
ZS" - 20M LOU I Bureau Ve6tas I Catifamia
Ow MOW"
lWanch managef and leadOm=uIal F -10m mmevWf for the $49famento Afei�
IWO at fAsdom"Al 10
branth off-ite, ReWomble for the production and petformawof offim,
including mai3ittKnS CRvilt reLabOAWJp& Duties at ImeoudLod pMbrming
AFFILIATIONS
strvaur* plan rets for 71ndustrWi., commerrJal and resWential V, rjmM
flmftmol rago"n MwaWn of
pr*a E"04M
Im Power Er4ineers, ane. I Idaho
Project deftr, engin"r for �mdustdaPrQJea Prmided
viesign and cafKU'LiCOO-V ?Wm1AKtrAlCm,%rrv1wi.
FrVied Engtnnr / OMw Maw
19" - 1999 P1H En&aeerii'
Office Manager and pm-jendesip new resp We for the structural
des4aft *f vommtrcw tprojed'r.
praim wheer
.1"S - 19% Skene a ftise, 17D
Project en� respatmMe f*r pfc9WIng deftn and de"aflWig for
commaidal and industdali tW prd.)Om htludingvurmereiz p!rq*U Fn
the mlcf4i,+-cblp indintry,
19V - 7-095 DES Erzlae&:-s &.Ar&Aerts I Cw'-Nornia
Pf"ded en&nwimg 4esign anal detall;bg fwr a s E, 4v"Otuvom.�'
carpairote and re%ldenVal building rmpecti uiftV wood.Meet. concrete and
masenry building maw4als.
Ici
1i41TERWEST
C 0 N $ U a. T N. 15
GROUP
vrw��,r.axeB�F�e��t�•rg.���f
��PffS�1s�
$5t�.,�,xar,�'s � "4atr.•�.ru�ur�a al�r%ra)
Eis. Cor# E�#rs�'s•
tAsle-dA la* kce2p$.x sa*- 13zt . r 2+ .
ra cs
�AIfiC.AT1,0 85
prowao FAVIfty.
cc COMMV4 0004018 offIZ41 1
t ir914-CR
0A0f25510MAt
AFFit IAttoNS
0 so,#wr, Cgf �
Tom Campbell:, PE
senior Plan Review anilln-evr
Torn i partidpalted at the highftt k'` of the buW10S Mks Wath 15
years In nanagement of XBVs Edarr.ation PreVarn, He Wd and directed
work av4mrents rerw7 ng to the dm1opment of tunical "Wlcat�r
basad on the UBC, 0111C.Arid IRC for We In CUW. tr IM11W *1 g(ChIltCts,
enonevs, Inspactors and code slat s, In ad€ oM Tom deflme std
C141iMMOiMal fflaWlal W C040 enfOrOMen.t Per5tznfl'4,
arChite s, enginem and cmtrartors, w i� Staff imison aad X80
representative to one of 5 code development committees charWd aar€'th
4eve4cong 4te 200* I.ntematimal aw1tfi Z Code. tf you add Grp 4 yrs
e rW In , ewluavon of w. w ,Krait me arrat fats and vwthod5 of
cwtstmctlon, 6 years In the design, dew;l aftd p n resew std or
If:`r'suarla p, imm- eroal and midential strurtu res and owr 2 yrs
Ir3tva-eVen of fairzd raa nt building dam to ararivaW and se fir level
college arrch►itaedu-ral AudLints—you arm quft 0 total 01 MWIeAte a
depth to any proj.
PR*j4a —r spe4rrac 2.xPF irrNCM
sur f Play laew I pr4ed MWMW
2 —Present Intertest COMSUftlGMP
Engi-near aaxd lead plans mmrnlner perfarrnirg cam rehknWe J14M MVVeW
and ctient 1,030aln's WMM for ►.h4, -M Ca4torrsla.
senior Staff Eoonee-r
IM186 & 2WAXG
aiternatiueaa� Code Council Eazlaation Ser,441L UIX.,
R ed teahrr l test aeparts and prepared evalu"an rem on the
pre" -ons of tom° ICC rdod a 3. doped test standards for products
emit in nPUDM* with ICC codes,
Mquisittan & Development Tt&nkW #r*&r
2 — ION tnlwnafional Cade Ccundl
Resited authors for h rol pla6tlr�ti �, ww'*,Avd #ecimlcak
pu 3icatio- as for 10C model wde compliance, a B del d technkal
pulitiozas.
Education Programs ManWr
Z91 — ZW2 �nwt atiana: Confew re of Building MMIals
Supe rl d ai4 ddr tod support and technlzal staff of 15, establMed Vd
in;Mntiekned d r*jv*nt budgn,.%heduled tr:3ining programs Virouebeirt
the US and Int naVorktAy.
lasr
1960-198S Fred AsMon & Assatiates
Peftrmed qru ttuml design aid detaft of and trial, ewnffl:efea1 and
residential aructur coordinated structural alp wft arcalt M,
sup&mse4 draftsman.
f:u�er
lad — l:f��� �`alifnrn� �tat� to�nia Urag5lt'y
Deveopod curt@ sum fm and instruction to gTaduaSa and stator
xdvitecturai students in vaft as 45PMs of structural des4n.
CONSUITHNG
GROUP
WW W'� In to a'W eta to ro-com
4DUCATION
C*�Mya su" Ul**WF&AV
56emwfft, CA
in ".414F.0 WW
Gft-Tetbft" f7vK"Ing
9s, OWN ftmoft
;WffamLa Stags Vnvvi�q,
" 11W
AA. r+,W� SOUKOh.
MU C. ��, rA
julwnw
akG§STAA?10ft5
C, E N T I f I C A 7 10 N I
'qMKUM1"gneer
Wwaf celftM121 SM12
Pmfimsmul C" EAVAM
stm 0 Q"Voil I CU9�w
CA50 0441wg offWA
�Wcw a -W" L-Ismur
Ron Beehler, PE, CEO
superAsing stracwral Enslnear I COAM04 13V41dins W490W
Ran has over 25 y1eats expefiiPnce Performing tiff, ffly. acmvbifity and
strzctp ira t plan r eVxv" f or co m m orc.al and hft fthfavi W -es in
califoreft. HK b4iwouad tzzlvdes the pask"" of Chief BUIEding coval
Wan to Gly Gf SgMD*4to 41vwft a Staff Of 120 tivnem, PI'm
reViewers and building In tm, du r Ift. whkh the ftitdllng Wokgon issued
vye: JAL= pemilts anrwity W cans uctlaa with waluagan in gxcass of
one bMl*n "tam :Additional wv, k owrience itdes bis m -ow up ffam
wflor Struft-ral U%&Ineer to Re0anal ComV,'ience Officer MO, the Offim
of StatevAde Hees Pbnnft and Oftdopmant JOSHPOI where he was
reWn5jble for vivctuiral plim mulew of hmp4al projeM and reWanf%Le
for hospite. and health Cart- fkft ranstrurfwn aversigbt M the WS
Angeles and San Dfto areas.
Engla"ling Deign and Constrvoon for the Czl[Wn�a NaVwat Guard.
Ron � de*cated to mna-Wwf r.1mg M -i Arvcl-ur40 -006 ar.-4 knaofte of
014fornia bur*ng wades, Jaws and rt-Oations rented to the 5%ructurW
He attends structural syrnpasurns. kq=res
and mWoS ttasms on � regulat ba0s to onsure up-t",ate knwMM&- of
WW -of -the -art design practices -
PROJECT :SPECIFIC
sulldft a seety seroces mar'aaff
- Present lraem�ast Consulting Group
uf uctur4l eno..&ew and lead projen manW perfa-TmIng cmmprehens�.--Are
plan teview and c Is nt natio s ace far -NarthewnCAW wz—
Ch&ef Building offidal
2003-20% 01V of Uaaffleala
ambl" Lkv"W
Manned, (Pu edied md mara attiVl" fm a Wile 4epartmenimith
r sae at scgave.filght
�ibftles f6r =Wtivction Wpecuomar.4 p4n'rNew vAth
N44knuf f aftQP�ta# "azaw RP44-444
valuation emceeling $1 billion isnavitily, Plamud, orpnized. admWpuvad
R891-4- VdWx16
z;md raluatl� gaff wo& Report wfift and presentate am W mnm= N.
won" r.V%#sNM WW -'erafnitV
gtoups and pwfeWanal *.Wa-a.at1=k, plomed and in bred $33.6
CWWNWA, 0WIA U*Vjp" 11101M"f
miNjosa bufte.
tm*ew 1rrFAft1r4
upVO4"a erwneor
2002 - 2-003 C" of Sacramrto
SupeMsetl p9an review. rnart*% p4g Intak -and puV',c munW funWom
for 2 i-qo=g permit c&ntvs, traiftM and reenter W staff,, met W
atchlte-M andeACkweers to rasi)We buRdlag cad4- rOa I=f%
v=iftated Oanreoew for high ptofle praeo.% woficed YvAh f*1d
Inspection riperv4sors and inspKtws,
F48kxw C=02"T" Offim I SmIer slruaut v4n*.w
1"s "d 21002 CA W W Offim- of StAlvede litafth P4MW & Dove�Z
Supervised iia" a." ftospital In speefon prqgrarn wardIn4ing fteld
,; ns pecafar s1,1 a ff , a -td a op rava I of specW arm x0m moues, 9 ewfv ed
compgIcated code related Inspectiot., lssuM rev[ewed l9an% WdOrzt1ow
and wiluctural calzulafians for healthmre ladiftles, Camw[Wd With
.- 30 1 -
architects, engineers Im msolve complex 00de Gnwpmztionbtsued,
gewrthedand ,'nvestipted structura#, 3dequacyo"bui.d -ngmatenak and
w"amufamurea iroducts. Venfied ptaper lords, fdrce,5 4nd mate, Ia4 for the
design al buRdingS and equirrm., tmt aftrhotagc
C 0 14 S U! T I N G, F-agincerlms supent-Ifim
GROUP i992 - SSSS QliforW4 Natwil Guard
Super&ed and planned work for eng
,;neering dM%n and pMJM
InspKwn suff, dev6sped scope and WdSets for projects, dk&cwd
preparation of ptuvs ff am qreI4rnPwTV 04s4m thrcm4h wo-Nog Oraw)np,
murdinated and -appwved pfaied ipvifitaftrts a, -W tost fttlmaW,
neacti,3144 and approved pnaiea dhznges, wadi nate d Impeman
acrmd, rved kksptxtian ftu,.,e% rerpmented NaUwal
CjuAjrdfMl�tary DMartment at pubk masofingg, cxv;Autted plan review for
prolms. dft,%ned by camilant,% presmted de0v. =cepu and firai
desxggs,
AmOdAte SUM tial FM91fteer
M7 - IMI CA Stee Of fte *f StaeWde Hea Kh Plamhg & OevdXmen t
Rewe'ved Consruction p3am and w6ficanov's W rww bovWS and
AX NA v,,ufVmS fa<ies; fiv (:Y,,&mla building Code and UBC m4uifmenls,
me with archhemi, #nd vognews to re=lwe pt" resew issues, Towlewed
feld char4es, Imiestipted end fm*w',d canstrucUam mnMi3s, std other
adminTs"'.1we duves,
�> -
1993 - M7 CrIt 0 County RUNIng Dep yMm Reymm DwWo'n
Hgviewed camtructton plans aM and str%KVtral cakmdatWns
for bviWng code camplim-fM reviewed &M FCW 1CM&OW), MITI-
re,swential, commuciVP wid industrial simclu res- Met vAth design M W
resolve code lssuft rc4jPc-d to mmtrwrOal an4 remdentlal structures.
-302--
. avid 'ig PE, COD
Semler Plea Review g o
i 3 aam b6ngs over 3S yeWS of Meetm+ In m'Jft'fJPAI SOWMMM
k t S F lrt us$ing fine years as Mpartmznt Dlredw,17 years ft
GROUP and 10 yms m 0 kon Omit Enginwr In several cures in CelifOMJ9. He is a
reds r e�if F. ]n 9 t C. ,4CSF Offor zia asst Nwada and is an
f
t t
He �s kht38dfLIo kf the °iMY e� A P18T1 re4fw.S znd PFOWdes 2fEaT
U cWm ~Ore. 0?I iromm nks. to The deveoprnent corM rift}:
PROJECT SVE01FIO eXPEAAE CE
A14fSTRAT10MS
C99Y'1FI$ATIQMS
smkr Plan Rroim fo&gw
mo — siesent CoMt-,,Wng Gfoup
Em -neer and team pia" or4miner p `carni mVehemkw plan tester
P
t
and r$,3 IojjS StM es flpr Southtm CaRfOrM,31 and Nft2 t,
of A"WokV-1
2m - 2m7 Bureau Vorims
Im I
Sal
oemic"onk MW Ptrmft Umkms WrecW
SYp of dwntg� JUN 1971 2
-- 2003 cake' 01 UP40S
()e1W 7pmert and PenrAt Szar'e xes DepAment
A 0 # F S S 10 14 11A t
AFFILIi Tti 0N5
c4-VW�, ftitimoa'andtag aw
0-mpw SAI 4n4
Clty a eta
girld CN& of N h st
ffmoff A*4"IV -mm Im a
Plaeoftsand tnsp ti" flapaftrflent
�[ rr�� y,, ss�;;Wy�yyri,.�
I.aTil� or C4 ?Aerx # Ompt�`%aP &IWI,
oft
,7}+� p'�4 Mag
Smadi"S Ma E41 Re'1tr:f
cum pv1Wm 01m
1W1- 198.6 cfty of 1.41." tri na.ra
O CA pubft apo0,
6 wOW.Ff
Kimn�m,% and 3n ;tlo-n
f r c t
SuMing A= Erlgtnter
3!1l rzc6fct ¢OW bud*ftaoffer s
1 - I -M city of San jZKe
53 Itr 1 t ft?'IC 12-M, PIK
I�tifam crxt plovatm 1"4 to zm !
0-og-Mm"mt of Pflww Dew1opment
M7., ch*lf,,r a mt Val
Ax=Wpe ME Engineer
pm%* -1 W"?,Iwm lax mpto. 2mi
t7a -1oty rad W Jose
Mcmwr of few EVAAfjo $ars
Depammml of Public ''Nbr , opmovons omsi ^.,
1 stz?d2-WIyZ
G eY['Pt�':d6� E!l ��' p h .�:�IfN:��� `5Si .f•�+�i�Y T
Iti Iteet�dl2na li Er
ASM 2Wairat
Mpirmr cd Edav'.a& tcrsmue�par
rwd of Public Works, art ftlkedura'l En lAtt-Tin Dillisicm,
W orf'
P rnb�- &C4,d". S6r&a',t 6 gill=&^
Irl 4 inns
2m,10 r'.
1969--1971 Cityr f Son jo
m4upot P@Mft ofOQVr:pr
f'1�kWI A"mNFVZb OW01,,o#tyr
ri prtment of Works, Ai&teals En�int&efln DiVislor,
VAfted SUW Atr Fww, Capta3o. G- Al FnSk%ftA4S Offiw
1946 -1 United States. AT Force
At var%aus .Pr Faimv baits performed m.ghee- tri dutiees induding pUn&PS
and wnstrar0an manapmeftt for M73ftaty faMi UM RosponsibIg fw
Winning proints throughout the Re-publicof Xoma for the Korean mgltary
b4flid-up foRowing the 'PueWo lrt�OdenV. kngaeerinz Consbuiftion
Managgr got construcvw, of Dow ivy Form saw MIMM prowts
Iricluding 26 Uxkh-eed C-5 Colaxy alxmft %U.DW W- W m2.
.-3(3,4-
Norman Hong, Architect
Sonlar Masi R5$maArchit*at
I N T E R W E S T
Nom has aver 34 yws of exWF-mre tri int od,;ng Zen VeRT's
as a pian YeVew arebiten. As a prof lar Chit t, Norm has resigned
wido varf MV of mmmerdal, Instito0onal and resldeflW wq)Lc% and was
-Arw W, E Ltt 0 wo S I arp. *2 a fft
vvy adW in thr-- deMgm tefated wmmittem and wminissions hn the C-N
Cd uvarmre, fn his W"an Irev&W caremer, he has revi� pteiftis fw Wde,
compl4rice an behalf of many jurisdialcms inNofthem Caillfo� as wee �s
Nmda atW Calvado, fir Is ex.pevenve4 In a large wa-zlety of bulf ding tvpm
and has �LW&wW cornoex WWWR system's uAch w hwk-prof it-P loaf
In Un sow, anal high-dw, �esvns �n Colorado-
fXPERTISE
!knitr Pk.q ht4kw pm-ata
PROJECT SPZCSF�C MXP4RJZN%19
Sealer Pho Rev; 'w Archtted
fDVCATaox
2007 - Py M"M Intemftl COMIURB Graup j carlfarn�
$2,chvkM of ARNWIture,
Plim reVew archlttift perfarmOts wmprehenvw plan Tev,,gm and dient
relatiom w0ces t a variety 61 jurisdk-Vans.
&*A0-4V L► %fi
at 6 t % T X A I I a R 5
SdaW Mao R&W Ar ft
C t& 7 r F I ( A T 10 N S
1"7 - 2W7 102AjEurea�j Wftu g Carifornia
Perfamed plans ieviews for majot t*dustrW,,:*MMerzM,1, MIX-uw aP4
resldefte, dwelopments. Responsible- for Iffe/safe-t# re"ilews for A Ww,
projects, in ad-divan, to mKhaniT4, plarnblm,& evectrical plan rtviL*W and
P R 0 F E S 5 a 0 N A L
str=turaf revkw for smaller prolnU.
A F F E L B A T 10 N S
PW llmrwl�� elho " of UV*TM"
Madow
&MjLq14tM41 COMM a",
19M -1997 Hone. & An, �* QWwnta
fttmgff.bkd ad Ma proo"t of the
c4yal LhVM&,P DE100 IR W—ew
MnOpal and f6tinding padnv lo archftftl and 01,anWng desigo firm
vecWtAng in cornmerclaf JSWA), Irdstitafi=1 (20%) �ad MidW 00%)
dear".
Cibfnf UMMcft
Pao af dt's,
ArWM
try ca tar�uarterrr P&de*&4Vtwfl
71. 29W AswzliaWd Professions, Im I CAftrala
Part cwnerznd Vrte FreMdeat bn charge of ArchitWupe/StrTature 071wsicr-
SmperWsed A archlte=talperwinnelfor the 4qW;,awPat*37 perwn
r--,y at
fim- ReVonsible Far afl artfiltertural servkes aM vre^u in the office.
ftwon0bMm include prornaflan, iii coardWatiM design,
pTeparatloi of contriact drawinp ar4 speziRWIons, obt*n bkh.
admenhwation of cwstrucUwl twAracts =4 co*rdination w4h dert-n
consultiviti,
VAfted SUW Atr Fww, Capta3o. G- Al FnSk%ftA4S Offiw
1946 -1 United States. AT Force
At var%aus .Pr Faimv baits performed m.ghee- tri dutiees induding pUn&PS
and wnstrar0an manapmeftt for M73ftaty faMi UM RosponsibIg fw
Winning proints throughout the Re-publicof Xoma for the Korean mgltary
b4flid-up foRowing the 'PueWo lrt�OdenV. kngaeerinz Consbuiftion
Managgr got construcvw, of Dow ivy Form saw MIMM prowts
Iricluding 26 Uxkh-eed C-5 Colaxy alxmft %U.DW W- W m2.
.-3(3,4-
--305--
Van Wiffinger, CBO
18WUSC Senior Pin-nz ExamViper I WO C*411flad Sen-fai,
1"Spa4:tOr
INTERWEST
CONSVOING
Van bFinp mre than 12 yews of ind-vary eVefience �n the areas of plen
GPOUP
rek�, field inspMhm, O bulldog ad-m-'nistration for a varmty of
Weisdictior4 In CalftroU and Newd& w-, Is, knmn 1w, h94 abMity to
offeciently and methadlcaRV review plans for a vaeWy of projecu a=dF%
caell applicaVe bw'ldijv laws, ordinanzer,, and rlatiem
AN cen5ficatkm cotWmcl With his extefnve work eftnte jVVe, him
added deptb iW knoMedge an tb* mit current bulkiling regulations,,
,rewlting in ttmrough and cc", W4e p1l4n reviews for our thents- Ho Is wM
t 0 U C AT 10 N
4aW v4thir. ImWoV assodations and utffim Mr, on-galnq educatior, to
^A OWr--
conliftwily enhance and improve the tevd of seMm we pr Mt to t4r-
FAWWn coftat. n2ftna&' rA. 1 ".7
us.A9Y� ft
ywkvml�' VA, Me
PROJICT SPECIFIC MxPr;R43!WCF-
T-Atn r;&Wp. Un ti p,
SerAor Pbm Examiner I Stalar Whnng Impedw
CAM7
Vffa LOW. CW
MW4
Peftrm.1% non-slruMral and minor structural plan reAm Ifer commercial
and reshtential conift-Man projeM ai well as
E la t s a A Ir I a h
€E a T a IF I C A 7 F a x I
UK Plam VKWPWr 1 $056"Ics
Senkir Oudding Inspector I Deputy 8®rding Offirfal
PUB EMNsim-
BerTym an & Hemgar I Pleasanton K Santa.Ana, CA
CADO Ckizfedr c s
Man cherk, in%peaian, and limidi fv depzrtment adrdnistrario?, t In the
dfies of TFaty wW Laguna Wgue' In Notther-raind Switliv m CaLforma,
ceme*4
Lin f qumik:rg h-wWow IsMA4,30
stand! IA'%P*a'Or EV FIVIS fi'"real
nPC PWmbft4"WW I SWM344#5
2-GD3 Mono County I Bridgewt, CA
Resin gtial anal Commercial plan dam* and buRdft Inspettion serving
C*MfnUt,1WfA Of the eastLnn SleTra Tramfilshop baTopa- ii,
ICC r'*W'W, Wwoor %VFn 86
IM - 200 *tole% Abban Mw:clatm I Torrance, CA.
Vac avwtMWOV I 5LVXA-k' �r
Residential Cbm.mertlaland IndUstoal bulWrig ln M servospea?*
Ise W- ldft Insw *or, smw-CA
commupities of MIsslGn VjejD and Diana Point, Celfwrnla, and Pahrump,
UNCwnw—Alm
IN QMWROO" 1,%Vtzw 1 'SOP%643- 93
--305--
m
i m "Ar1r, Vaidez
c a
10C MariffUd Sonlar SuRdIns In-s-pactor
INTERWEST
HigWy knowledgatife WC Certified Building ln3peclar *Vith 25 years
CONSULTING
exlwelenm and, a rewrd of suoussfully inspecting Y4 phases of tom Alex
G R 0 U P
coqstrarVon projeasand guiftand svpmWng #dft �nsWtion V,,,3ff.
Art vmvales airr di is with a broad range of eWerelnce ¢n the buVdiq
bufting. `nqmc tion wah practiml
knGwW4P serAng as a permit tfth?t1rarl, W& eAfarremerlt and anIns
t 5 U C A T 4 0 It
He ks bi4w4aa% a Zan?, W -am OaVe w1th ew*06=1MmmuWtatlan
C0044 W10*119 M
jikills- lbege talents ttanslia'4? W effeCUW tetIM 0AWk aVO" all
zS ww's mw%ve "wvW=
idepanmenu and the a-Wity w serw the paWc f an sumessful inwnner.
An brings a bi&pxed, mature and kihf apptwch to 0 wecu, el the
job. Accomplished �n all dutiL Induding anspe-ellon, w4e enfaroetnmt,
Oan revWv, mult"Isepli-ne tnspectlaft, twrPat tML-w4. ttfteduft
c==laim rmlutl" and pro Wm wlyft team building, field
supvvisim, replat&V comphance, code Iftlerprotation, and; project
na I xx CWAWAV*6 Iftswvwl I
PROJrcIr SPECIFIC EXPERIONCE
Present Inwrivvit C"Sutting Gralip I U15 AzqV'M CA
Performing residentlaT and torrimer lo.M Jnspatfon wVqei at vac:,;-fs Ckent
lQcalions-
superinu-ndent
2007-2039 wauwman ca"SMUICO
F-effiv. med tesidentlaiand cwmrnwical Insverteon SeMce&
SeMar WMl r4 inVector I Acting SuRding Offidal
2001-2007 city of M410
Performed residmtlal and w-mmerlcal IrKpectan services
Wlqr 9-ilidloS btspect" I Acting wilding Offi6a)
1982 -1999 Oly Of PalM 0#45fft
Pedermed resident',41 and comm vical irk fan �seMcn,
Svpe?%Jwv auMns. Inspector
19ED - 1982 CPt*O of Coackola
Porformed re9danVal and i:*mmwl"P Ian peoon services.
Edward Cooke
tAMPOACC Certified Building inspectay
Ed fs an 3AMn.11CC CerVrwd Inspect" a wealth of kowAft6pand 11
gNTERWEST yearn of progfessive expecelence seroing mumdpahties In the $*--oftv n
C 0 N $ l T I N
7
. 0 U p chwk. staff traWng, app supeMsiom Ed bas Wso wvft4 in the red as a
pprWraction vaperinWAent, Which pm des hire vAth awmV,.-4
kn*wW.' of construction prartlz% as well as d-cywind ,ntwpr*tat-ori-
Ed Was &ftm? Ir4usuy certl6rations 4nd is dftfk4t*d to fnattain" h6
U C 19
knoWedSp of building codes aml the cons&uctioro Indus" by attending
T 0 A 04"
vAr4a,4-* traitiftwninars and vmrkshops. He brings hands-on ale=
with a proven tetw d of matttairan$ a hip standard of quality a.W
p roductf vity emu KM su ocessf u I projed cwnpkW, on,
AsWime Wlalcg CAW I'�* I'm
Ed MAK a differ by Ovelopb% Wkt Partne-MMPS With Aaff,
019awavor1w W*M110 & deWapers, znd the public to awe the pals of ow crvnt%, He
0MROMon Qooiptp f X" maintains a productive entArenment try conduct ft tharou& Inspections
rA." i jq AC&*MV =0 and'deRweing a W*h imiel of r? mer Kavke in a profftfVne Manw.
PRGJ9CT SP9CIFIC FXPERIENOM
[cc coftmw 5"J'ar J00
It t a 13 T N A 7 1 a N 5 20113 - Present lnwtwelt COM'Witing Group
CIR104 ICAVI ON'S
Wspectlars cif residential and com. mercial projects of all sizes induAlrS
cenffied weft W4 forI plan review as It pertains to ea� pe.-MIL Enfwm all aqpllca-ble state codes
SM024WRIS and city wdimami% for pa-dh d1scip-lim? as 4iTvc1f4 by 0�?;ns, Sovr&e
srhodukes and w*rkiw& for Wppction and pwmit Staff. pe forst pbl
C6ndwd check for code compLante. ConvVondtmte nth the pubtic and city staff
an issues w tasks. Rt eded to fulfill department duties. Provide continuing
CeAfWd
M&ha;t ftrr t r ed a tr. a r Vubft
, canlradvm, enorie&$, and architt-cls as
needed to provide ldente wfthb code parametem
sumps as It
sr 2002-2020 City of coma
?nspeaws got al; phaws of refidenual irk commerc[W proleas. Plan
check, permit Issuance, frGnt counter and carrespandir,& customer
�MW CLk�W&r seroti ge, planning and public w4m assince pWWAng to hufting
p"mits, inveftat1w ptom-is" for cod-e entarcment of mnWo codn
and FracUce% traimd staff and public on bAfing codes, updates, and
general information for successful project completion.
2CM - 20D.2 SFA & Avwd-ates
P raAA d e d onV y4 mL4 Ins ect-Q n % sand genera su penwm f i f4pr reO41",ria$
and w-mmercfal perrMts. Enforced all state.;md 61V codes for camplianm
with approved pMns.
Superintendent of Custom Mamft tgv4l*A
1997-2= E%fACUJ_ PlUftWnp
, MeO& AJr
PUnblPS insTa'Aadon far n-ov structures Indud-mo homai, tjt up buRdInE.i,
and new tract moM'p-al-ects. scapi* oaf work began Wah
-plan drmMmp. prwJuct purk,e, la%talla!�Dn' comple*nof adum arld
customer wy1ce as needed, CoordirmWd wZth emploVe" to ca mpleig
projects as scope and contracts stipulated.
,T
Daniel L, McCance
1= Cerfified BuHding Inspector
INTERWEST
Daniel Is an ICC Cier6hed Builcring Inspector and pmaesses ovet 10 VN-rs
C 0 N S U �- T I N 0
oxperience InproMingWiding In man serAcesto varmusjurkdictiovs
GROUP
Kn the WutMm and Northern California fegions.
0anlel hOds a vast number of ICC ceffifIrartorps And has j TharauXi
undestandirg of the 0. nciples " prw.r-dures of rewrb keeOME and
report Wepwabon, He bfireg& a weakhaf harsdi,,� �md d-wfw., kncwledge,
In b0ding Inspedions for both reVdenfial aad rommerdal arenas,
Pantel makes a diffwence by deve-laping Wid partnembips iWith staff,
Ane rWe CMj, QOW, Ra eVft- CA t
deWoWs, and the piobMc to achlew. the his of the Clem He
Cw_wxA%"
maintaAns a produoJve emAronmeni 4 pmvidinf: thwaugh IrrspedWm,
malowns eneltent cmrnunlraton and delivErs a high l of customv
A f � 4 5 7 R A 7 10 M 5
c RT4T I CAT 10 NS
sinvice in pretiao" manrw at all Wnews,
PROJECT app-citric EXPER�;5HCE
Ubt
Fte
Suliffing Inspecw
2W7 - Prtumt tntwwiev. Cnft0Vnr, Croup
�M cofflws#�Nm 14wew WOMM,
Perform Impedtan wVm of elf phaw5 of re0dential, hsdusWa�,
Codes I wsvi�-So
=nmerdal Wildmig and aweW bifty Mspedlon at vams clitnt 2=bam,-
11C fvt"A Envftwy 3 5OMIS-ts
0enti Include but are. nat 1.=Aed to the tities of Pomona, WS fta: LA-P,
wCeMnIcal "ffifeaw
pard.&, and San jaw.
4Ax' ale fth3"kNI V*Omaf
Imp"Wr
I -A7 73,1-44
2002-2007 WHIdan
CC IVWAbft $21SFw1w use
Per. formed Buildin inspecfan seMces to varfous cllv%s. FtawldiM
Mspetlio* (wr a vaflety of commercial projeM, rvaffi-urft tract homes,
"MO ftw" Enwe-or I MOM
tenant lmprcwmen-
Wge custom homes, 8M %�
I WM4
Bob AIMIMU, PE
pmfewlaftal Civil ftaine4w
INTERWIST
C 0 N S,13 L 'i � N Mr. 9-miraH has 26 years of everience proVe4h4-nonm r%
60n&al Civil t , acrd
GROJP di -,q WppWt SerAce& Hts exWlence Inc;udes the design, project management
and over indqang plan reAew, of publi-c and private land devegoomeat
"e -ch Irt Cahfcaala, Colorado and Virgivia. Ueso have Induce rt%ldtantial.
mmmerclat, a3td,indust4al oe deqeWpments, irqa4lway des%=, vatershed
analyM gmd)ng and drwnap plans, sWrmRv& IV aind %to MWVW-.?
C A T.1 0 N pkwM vrasWa and sg-dimensaWi
taftn control plant, tary and water Main system
dtWpv, ftod -plain stoOies, and site gayouts.
Mr, AWrag has exteneve exper�ence lz the rate of W�ert Managm for CaplWl
pn4ec%, �ndvding dL--Jgn, averslghtl, calcuUtlon revkws and
S EG t5 TRA T1 ON$ ommpffanoe assuram. in " rcie, Mr, Akwrafl has earned a reputation I& diest
OVWT J C�OM48 SaafaoWn through his comtWAMent to sftp"MW4W5S, at"tion to deWO, budget
IMA / Ne, 3U41 cmmmunication skiils.
UAffiW-11 / "W54
SAMPLE PROJECT SPECIFIC F-XPZH1ZNVV
Sub has bean respons%fe for plan dtecMM awrsight and accept -am of numerwus
f0adW41J, WFaWUcture, entiVem-sent, and land devetopm8n-t prujectl for Many
dGm town&hlsis and pluxte clWots. These reiviews Included the reWew and
approval of tethnw dommenti, far AWfflffW'CWL ift&-Strw and
roaftaV projects. Mow reviews included assotbtedHydivewk and *Ar WWVand
OMP reports, verifying enf.neering amraty. plan cansisttmq and C"WiMce
vAth local My Stan ds and CaMrans Spedfrations.
P.Pwv�om M"ft4w inan chock Expouftee
'Vity of W-10, CA
fagUlm is CA
C4V of IMA G CA
011 of Yigba City, CA
CRY of wflotna, CA
Tq*t Manager responlZble for the design of puWk w&M wadw-vy
pftonqru Them ndvoed
cticm, •WId^,ning and Safe Acute to School projeM.
roadway, K4ewatk drain W a -W UNIII'V&SIgns, Which ceqWred knowledge of kchl
Is -1, nt 24
and State regulaticns Endfuling the Ame.ftZh UnAbilitV Att and Ca IfUT -a Tid0
MY of Elk Grow, CA - vwCIP pr*ads IrAhkft, Bmte'Afle fid, M G -,M Wvd_
'1a Bt
thy of Wdmr,, tA - We ftutv t* SdwxA ShftwgN Imommv-ren U
ciry of Eagle, CA - Varknm Pavement Aeumlawdgn pr4ects
ML CA - 6 a St Wdriw bIteesed ban P. FRAU U 0 t'd P2WMAA t
'e projecu
—� oq —
Public Works Dlrectcw
2.2999 - 201
ftbtic warki MMOM 1 MY Engbmer
1.999 ;1
Pubtle Works fNrzcUw I Chy EMIn"r
1992-1994
DepatV city "neer
1996 - L%2
City d Athrop I tathfop, CA
aty'af %%Mtels I winters, CA,
Cay of Moao Bay I Mtv ro Wy, 4CA
Oty of Oce.3n.side I O�ansidee CA
— � 1 ()—
Jon CraWfard, PE
-pa rvIsIng Water Resourcos Plan Roview Englne,*r
MTERWEST
CON S 03, T IMG
Jon bas *YV 30 y*Irs of tW20enze irt the engin Tisa fIL4d iA- bt.th th-i pub-ilt and
private sectws servfP4 as a Public Works Iffirecte-r andUsty Engines and Cty Surveyor
www'94teTwe'a c f
forsavmP, cftivs, A5 a manager, he was provided effevive war6navon and awsight of
the dtimtopme"t review prarez i.Pcfudtand wbw-w "— t
�mpravamvnt plan and subdi0sion map reviews. has exterWNA training, kn*Mefte and
wj& of the State WpAn, drafted and e4naved ordina nce a -W Code nWakm, marard
E Z P E 9 T fA E
the formatlan of CommurAy Facgitie. DiAdd-s%, Asvessment Mstrleb and Lightsig aid
rAdn"DAN stmawgel
�,,3ndwpp 1>4VicU, irn&ff*nted processes to meet current MES design a -,W
PZW sr'dww LW -W
c*rAtratti-on req&ements. ;i% well kis fttabIr0ed Mated it ams WAh awwr oty
depz?trnarft on common proms, partku larPy wqth fu nWanAV rr4ntaina�ae destv
EKPERIENCE
xt4Mm.,nicticift guldeinm
IWO, Morwev..' 7 Wan
PROJECT SIPBGXF�c txPtPItxK0V
9OUCATtON
SuparWsft D&4ctqpm&nt &Wnftr 2W4 - Prewit Mgrs est IVA Gmp, CA
V -.Wf 34Y 0 CZYWO, hVkW-' 00
Aespons]V--e for managing the d0 wVmw Gf gmfflra�,and JmprtrvMtnt silex Iftle-1wftt
tM wO C"xmwwW Eng�
recevei from vadous 4gendes. Jon aho primed specialized on-site staff
augmiwatw to agenan Re has cwtliftale4 the d1scrotartary prq1*0 review and
R 9 6 IS T A A T 10 M 8
app?awa4, degV-. review sad of Malm MiVate a2ttI UWIC projem thlrau&h
C 6 R T I f C A T 10 JM S
the iDften cumhersc =e City and OutsWe Agency peareitting proresses,
F-WrWMU, ENPV--
S"eMsEos Dr4d*Pawn% EnOrgeer 2003 -present tme-west I Wildomar, CA
ResponslWe fw- estabfishmg and rAangfog all Zinewin& waze5sys, old-14(ti-ng the cmi
feview of &-xretianary aWiratfom fi.iai mgps and radgrwg and JmpTw**mPnt ptam
owru,& the Trarwt6*n of over M p-To0a appkations; and cM9 rmA&.Y-, and wVrked
with the ft,!nning and suP4Mg DeparsmanK an e9jiblishment of a uniform traddng
sygem- wheet 25Ot- projects Am b0mg traded an� prom, kxd Aci ahly & MnIhs of
in rp fire , *Mba traciting of deposits and billng system fat 91 private
dewlap nxmt reoews (Pbsent nz e4nmn& $twmwater and BuRdIsSI.".med
creative review process Wh g'M the &Aftlement pfowu �$ riAnnfng cancurrenVy With site
and buAdirg design.
EnStn"Ang m2mWex 2MI - W04 Nolte EnSinecring CA
Respoftible ,'las' Manaament Of water,. mater and TeCyded water
pnojects. ProvWed quaRtv amufance andqualfty Ea ntrol err evmws on publa agency
pr4n,t!5 and studies, sermt-das consteuctitm MaMWf .91-A fefWM sti fora $t..4
mg.11an waswwa*.tT trnVnent plant expamm andassfttant residM.1 "Oneer of 32-
rnEe treated water pipeline project �dtijl 5 wpa--Tate contracts and sup6 project
Inip cwrs;And the C*O , cal ser lea . -e - � echitl
Public Works Dlrectcw
2.2999 - 201
ftbtic warki MMOM 1 MY Engbmer
1.999 ;1
Pubtle Works fNrzcUw I Chy EMIn"r
1992-1994
DepatV city "neer
1996 - L%2
City d Athrop I tathfop, CA
aty'af %%Mtels I winters, CA,
Cay of Moao Bay I Mtv ro Wy, 4CA
Oty of Oce.3n.side I O�ansidee CA
— � 1 ()—
T
tNTIRWEST
CONSULTING
GROUP
WWW,ix;%,#t o*49rp'c045
90UC,%TI*N
tta��i f�i
?sugar of SCM`f*1 CAF E
I
BEQJSTE9ATIONS
CFATMfATIONS
ftyft�40"f Q4 rzfmw
VT$eL, l ru f it Eftfifter
Smit 0. i is "a TM.469
lKs £ En *er
swx C% hewmh I aro-:
&+M1064 of Er9i"M
crate$ of Anmm 4 N4,2s"2
Irk,'TWFfsopera wiiIfrO,*&
ves 1%&, ir3
V410FtS5;0ftAL
Af9111 h' IONS
A r un Putek works Amey
IMINtaft elf Terra m
Mark Wessel, PE, TE
Irraffic EnIftnew j 1 1aAW Civill 1a - r
?r- Wessel has more than 30 yews Vf expetkuAte iA raae;a:akldpal C914netfin In bo4b
the pbkg and jsAwte wWrs. As a mnsu tanl, he built a traffic nee6n? sec6on
and nlanogOd a 610 d a d3)AO*n, r -O Mang VWM, his PTG-Iessiorlal s -nACE5 Were
prcvAda exciu§.vEly tri pall2k agCV1a WHI a Spet if.aed an WVifto M Wfttraa CaY
Traffic E neer and/of DqWtv Cky Engineer for vaftus dtl ft�d4d rpv%.
Thew nd 00m, Wtmliake VAlaReS, Uabasas, azW t"sxaleta. to that caparity, he f !�
been repwsab4 for establlishment of stimclards and: procedures, dweacipmem
rtMew, Impact surly waping/review, d elopme?nt and vpdate'a p= fry, plan
,�h, dog&p, combludi managMesat & t>r0UW4—,L Qatln& tri
lrib-astructure matnteanance, traffic inwvst1 iim gd liten r ue0s), aAd cty ane
ff repwis and pra" ties .
As a TmnaeLt. he hat, beim reasp+ Wjble� for rem4im B. Er ng and perfannance
remew of staff, as w&l as busine m dewftprem, projea mape ond fee
+d rnirl� ctrs,
Proposal prefra tfon, contract n latlon, chent coamiftillion,
proj k%tvMfw prewtabon, and project management ud ,, schedv%
arcakmV.M and quAt j+OMW4�,
PROJECT SPFF04F140 9 00 -RIFE CE
nyTrArk Fn&V 4
Gtr' elf' eahke edyil a (Ott' Tracer E eer)
2i present
city of Wrlrove (Teaffic E"E.Iri ')
2003-2005
0ttt & W stlake vailage (0ty Tmifit Fr eer)
1939.24
Clty of Wealake Village (Deputy City Ea r)
1 i• 3
City of " ou (atv -`ramm e e er)
2002-2003
Tai un of Los Gatal JTMM Traffic Ef3OMM)
-ItA3•1
City of Calabasas 10ty Traft Wn t)
t k-
CJW of Th rd Oaks ICAty Traffic E ne erj
1%1-1992
inti of Moorpark Pty'€ra€fe'r en a erj
fl - t
OWgrr Designedw wpetVfw4 the desWrl of dozen% of projects InWv% af€fr
slpe4, rviLmIng,.strfpl , mfc central, rounftboMmTm widenln& slurryr s€all,
aml pwement overlav, my of thew projeM entaitlet+d nesse on vAdenufng,
comtruction stagft, ra3seid median eras l%tira , i l l phOng, and/w CaRrarm
cnardinatf2`n, PT014d Wiles fOCIV' Paioe'raat Aec Aue tate f[W thoCAYat
Ventura., W ' Zctur'.a i oulev" - Tourers Center Cast 06esewy signal far the City
ofCam. aril , ofidge Stint Rtconstructfon fir the qty of Yuba Oty. Thar d
- japer Avenue trafAc siVil and o her VgnVs far the City of Venturst.'yerba Suena
Sa,00l temporary traffic signal for the Lm Wgia es Unified School 01svic t, Salcom
Canyon itaad Storm Danube Repalts for the County of Yentum, traft control for
va"us fealvals and EEK clan events for the City of W'easUalke Village, las VffgeAes
Road - Lost NHIs Road rel*r inwrsection mnd r atkm for the City of i�aLabasas,
vaftus trafft gn.36 for the Olies of Westlake Mliage arid moorparlr, Patter
Road Nadal Caretruntan WttalcoEntrao for the, 0 y of Part Hueneme, W,4- or
corridor imprommffas along tsndero Canyon Ra" for the CAV of WeVflake Wiage,
aM kia uo Bouloaarid Overlay for %he 0tv of Ventun.
CI rati€ ns: As Oxy ?raffle Engineer or Deputy Cti)t Engineer, responded to d-tizen
r ut,.andf 0.40 its, carlducted field Investiffafions, and a owti€nate;i vAth.
-all-
INTERWEST
CONSULTING
GROUP
www. in toTwestgrp.c0M
contractors, utilities, law enforcement, other agencies, commissions, etc.
Investigations dealt with speed limits, signal operation, school zones, sight distance,
speed humps, parking restrictions, pavement repair, collisions, sewage spills, road
closures, tree trimming, lighting, drainage, street sweeping, encroachment permits,
landscaping, sidewalk repair, etc.
Planning: Supervised dozens of projects involving traffic impact studies, project
study reports (PSR's), corridor studies, and circulation elements. Many of these
projects entailed extensive coordination with various agencies, developers, and
consultants, as well as presentations to City Councils. Project examples include Eco -
Logics Traffic Impact Study (David Hare), Seagate Traffic Impact Study (Sunbelt
Enterprises), Citrus Place Traffic Impact Study (Hertel Development, Inc.), A-1 Body
Shop Traffic Impact Study (Mark Poole), Conejo Valley Plaza Onsite Circulation
Study (Beauchamp Family Trust), Offsite Parking Study (Whole Foods Market),
Mixed Use Parking Study (United Shah Corporation), Site Access Study (Plaza EI
Pescador), Dole Corporate Headquarters Traffic Impact Study (City of Westlake
Village), Base -Wide Engineering Traffic Study (Naval Base Ventura County), City -
Wide Traffic Study (City of Fillmore), Circulation Improvement Study (City of Port
Hueneme), SR 198 Corridor Study (City of Visalia), various impact studies for the
City of Moorpark and the Town of Los Gatos, and Circulation Elements for the Cities
of Fillmore, Westlake Village, and Visalia.
Development: As City Traffic Engineer or Deputy City Engineer, reviewed a wide
range of proposed developments for potential impacts. This encompassed site plan
review, as well as scoping, coordination, and review/approval of impact studies.
Conditions of development were prepared for most developments, which entailed
extensive coordination with various city departments, other agencies, developers,
consultants, news media, citizen groups, etc. The conditions ranged from
traditional, such as offsite construction of public improvements, to more Innovative,
such as negotiated cost-sharing arrangements, effective trip reduction programs,
improvements to be coordinated with private landowners, annexation agreements,
and development agreements.
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Project manager for the development and
initial implementation of an ITS Master Plan for the City of Elk Grove. This effort
included creation of a $43,000,000 impact fee program, inventory of existing
systems, evaluation of available technology, development of standards, evaluation
and selection of system hardware and software, and prioritization of short term,
medium term, and long term improvements. Standard special provisions were
developed and implemented "on the fly" due to the rapid pace of development in
this dynamic city, where approximately 400-500 building permits were issued each
month. The fee program generated approximately $100,000 of revenue per month,
challenging staff to keep track of development status, fund balance, and
improvement implementation.
Funding districts: Updated Areas of Contribution for the City of Moorpark,
implemented Bridge & Thoroughfare Districts for the City of Calabasas, managed
the $10M Arterial System Financing Program for the City of Westlake Village, and
developed the $43M intelligent Transportation System Fee for the City or Elk Grove.
Developed nexus calculations and findings, negotiated with developers, and
coordinated with attorneys, consultants, and other agencies.
;S12
www..tntorwootiorp.com
andab . ftr la s - CMno Portal Ra,s, Wab ut dm - (0ty 40
'aba-sasI, SR 398 Corridor Roundabout4maWw. $0%v of vswlla), $wArwe Wage
roundabout dftlgn review (Oty at Ver-turaj, Errs mel. hgl qomws rioundiabout mWow
(Tom, of los Gatosj, Houston AtteMU& - 'Saffto Fe Stmt Roundabout F biNy
Study subcomu ting f `1ty of Visalia}, and re A--ar of a--oundaboa defems al €,C
Grove BoWevapd, FrA StocIfton Sculevard, anti Aulere;y Moe (Cy cf Elk Gr j..
Stew PaInmr, PE
aftwneeeng Plan Review I matTZSW j City On fa -Ver
C O N S U L 71 t 0 Sty has a r 17 Wart, of Gvfl and Environona l &fneetiing experienM indudi
GROUP mangirg a dty tnf n me ng departwerst, 67,V capital improvement pre -j , exwlepw
as
# dt R iR etl iet ,aro 1t rt tta+ ntaf i edn, St has b�
it s in A vfam of pmjftl &wlopment for both land d iopment and:public
works impTvsement pmjetts. Fiis ,and devemp*r wt ertper>ence Wdudes pftn review,
revivivarrg financing plans and .est estianalln& tentative map preparatvn, performl.
_ hr Itydri€t�a prix r} pla�r►s, pr>rst itpra.rnt
C ATI anp4risimd pmwida'n f; evtw. o4 canstruttan support. Swve"s des%!m eatperiemce
encomp ses uadm& serer. Wa49T, swrta dsaK arty w+ wav imprravem s.
p
of 4 ak He is also highly f tp+atlent tn? ofwAdF tE enonvwftsupport requRed to fafm and
;trYo`R74ft C I A mdrnWsm- Inftstru€ture tiatarAng grog arns, de fpr t impa&. fee p a d
F:
catr mnfty fad;ay dtstria% and mwimmM d1strias. I% caplU OfqjM e2d .c-
is t deg grant wridAgantlt re gg rat %t of Interchange m4 other large im)dw
9:tM tFi-CAT10KS
Etlat§
Manage the cappiaai irnpra-rernen t engi-rweTft development enffiftVdM aAd tragi
!%u-tcVom5 of a OW enoneeriang deW-Ment Impernent zero based biu ti methods
iia the WratN, and capItO. ImpTowment pmgrarn budgePrepare capital
improwment program, ioasdi to ansa "ram prWjwilh the €tet i* etropofitart
piannmg ftanizatlsan. Represent the CUVat xe0ozW, transpartatioti, water, 4a
agency mee ngs
Capel Project Manniment
artaged roadway VnWavernent projects and it voVed in project tfrandns and N ve, e
and Wajr:an Kwn, Regi bte for moping a CIP fw Ortys Frst rcadvmV tee
pr .arca, indudk1pr"adng and supeftfol wst Pstfmatesfoy OVff POW -of
*qadway €mprm ernents. Adminatemd r rnbwWrr nts horn Raadwq Pee Kat rrarn
jad Qrnruntty realities Oistdar reviewed the finandnp; plan for a lerge L900 acre,
ZON tame tdeWbp rtt art, aAd coaftlioated submisilon of Fe4era¢ app +�priatiaras
rew4ests W city Management Manaw fatal cansgructkm phoe for $80M Grant Line
Raact,3t State iit -.te i Inti m-hangre pt*e hnai desk and t ,strutb7ctat of the Safe
Raute,,p toschual Laguta Creek VAII Bridge; and final design of the int Une Rudd at
waterman Road Intenecticn,tatspr v r t PfayeactMade significant mnvibuVorts to
blcyde and pedestrUn aw&ss and praared sua&U grant appllcatlGr4 for two Mede
aatd VedesVon faOlties. Awa supervised ptaming stiff cm4tft OYI S fiat iii de and
ftdimrjan Wter Plan, and the t4ty at Kemal Sicyde and Pedestrian tester Flan
subwm.m tree Mmt nV.
Sup+erwised prepara€fran cif and prepared ettgirmftering plamp reports, inlCulab m. and
eolmajf4 for land development proje-cm Rttsp+r -W for rtraai ran and
e.Mineeflng oms,ructitm stippon for a ,�andom[rrlum projed in RiveffsIde County, and
flrt;af englneezing for a Soahem California Ww VectricaP bxW*siM-
EftWormenial Semkft, Sispetuli4zed and c dducted ent&anmen G t1W InveWlaliam
and "rfarnued clW, engin *i.pg design..
--S 1 -5 -
j
Tom Marnocha, CESS WI
ConstruzVen obsem-
CONS'j L TIN G
C� ROUP
I am bfings mere than 29,yeags exrwfvt-p In t" areas of co: -'rumon
managernent, in5pection, planplM srhtdigla aaW'pf% pmject Management blNnp
WWW. FA
and paVrmen% mWact admWrtraLon and cmmp!lance, fietEd art&.eaim CravAty
assur and matefts tetfing for a vafifty of pub& wotk5, rWdenfiai and
ance,
CMSMWO wm 'k-ron I LmWallm
^,m to bring a dztq uftderVandLn8 and merOw to
vwbaeqpwd Alows h,
His & se n
kvrmWaW
cffie,, and gawnmmt agendes on Wge, complex. ho --Mm Wnstrmaion p1WAdS.
projech range frac smaN 61y pro -AM to mWri-nilPar, da'slar projects Jndud;ng
ICUCATaCN
parists, fire sta6zns, street improv menU, 4n4 communty bv3dmFA_ Tom 4 �n
"Pir, t M Lwng the Contract manage. r Dotum"k Comw. Slum WWth U61ftaw
*1� WdMV*11 T0&4*a1
his atifty to co4aboratiwly wwk wM & parties tmuftg pmjeds are wAl
W40NM�NW71
rvAnaW and brought to a -succeaful compWion.
HK trjWagwPd esxper€ ce m. a wide wriety of prajWs oomWned with hti Vraog
INVEd ISI RAr"! ION 5
feader5hip, orpntakkmUyle, and affeLtive wmmunkati"ts with all interested
C-9 9 P I C AT 10 N S
12
partite make the 0f t e w ate pr*WU " =m4w
WW"
PRQJRCT SP2,01PIC EXPVHRHCE
Nudze DLnV.v � W*Aor,
'TTftWMtF*njrWWM4rW5
-W SOV4
2011 - Present Interwgst Comsuftine, Group
Vw'vVJqa.CAL7AM6
- n1l
Provides a wriety off se. vices to disaft In the Southern C. foritia r neud ng
0
can ruction m�)mj.eetpvmt, public works constrecz�nn management and
S
zzwp�*4t and ftof4 COMAnKSW
obsemtlan, inspedkon, and SWPO
CMIM, NIL 213a - GL.*Jkd tM&WM
WMEM and sum lfttff bsoedw
Nix WON
201-208 City of Palm Uestrt Freedom Park
This $20 MIMM, 23 -acre park vq;W rKvIved therWil.'a-mLa Pwk and $Wcreatiort
V It 0 F 9 S5, 10 N A LSad
ratudkon, Manapt fir the etys JCMJ Award of Exoellemo,. Served as ai
project. which fnduded an urt"round Willy cowbv0*4, deariiV and "Ww
IffIgnion anat tamiscapemstallatim, rough. and Ent.sh grading far basebifll rMW
AmWown VM&*4 lWay tAWSJ
W4 eYWIf couns, tennfi coum Oate pwk, On milp"nt, se=r fkqd vAlh an
Ma" Waft" "to? C"tega"
vn&igromd dnlnz& vy3tem, concrete site ftnprovemnt% curb and Wtv,
aighalt par" lola Snack Uar and Mexerk/W.om imPs R -i, -W= -n facHlry per OW of
` PrOUNMW W&W
PArn otl*q sped tions and P44S. cow&naftn math C"Chelz Valley Water
District on ft PLICetent of a fidwv WeD site was a majw contpinent of We
Project.
2Wfi - 2007 ftim Dewn Redevelopment Agm. cy VWGT info Cents
Serve is the owner repmentatoje an Itis $4 mHon, 4,200!sf Viftr Wonn-ation
Cent,* nutuast Safety awf#'Cent,*project,for �quarotv mtrol 84W Com
Coalucted daily fn ti and conferences;.and rmfan ed, managed, and distributed
submittals_ Konaged a9l contract admInUtration and compliance. Staff also
providtd pre-c.=trucoon f4duding i3l id liKy ri to tl9t re'vievi) and
consmetion management leyvlcft.
--S 1 -5 -
r:�anstral�ra 79��1�r' � ErMsp
— 2010 City of HkrmoU Beath I Pier AveAW
INTER Sit I S T This was a $4 mil,"on prtaj #, wWch had smeral funding sources Including a $1.2
C O N S U i T 1 N rp tnR4i*0 fiW44VI ARRA Grant from the State Water S+R f4s-'a he pr`i'mari goa4 for th,s
GROUP Prdwe to k prcve the aesthetics of t1w strtkt iirtd'MrcMnS pedeApian
www. into rw * � t o r F . g Q sm acce*1blky+, parking, landwAialag and hardscape, Pigs Avenue �s the CWs 'AmM
stmt`` In the dw4"bwM ar =asirft PacRfic craaq ltlgl sway to the
€ unl i aM Kw and Pier Kaza. P r Avenue i5 of the fav MTA Bus 3Rauti 1r the
OW and wPI kodude rww bus shellas and other tr wsi l rated impTaimments.
Commotion analam
2 City of Naha Mirage I �i3rRa Rosa VlE� 1I0� Project
t
Provided we-amstruiWort servim, and CMA(Utftn Wad
d l r t� an related serwi f w 2be Vtys Ww4ntome housing przqwt and
sft daRy ming as owners r #r l ti ls. Emred caristructlen sa#�-tr oversight,
quality watrol. progress l en contrite anO
4t�it€€.t �n'tnt�i.
r e n
lasptMr Vfte kroner
7005-2006 Oty af, Rancho Mirage Ran * 3a mgip Pubk Chrary
A iiew $1S rtvuiian public ltbwy is a s -stM chk liar&: -y hutldirag of app o amately
43,E squaao feet on a ire site Wcaled along ll4w.ay T13- between Bard Jacinto
DtWe and Paxton DrWe_ The bulkift interior feow plan confsts of uffices.
r•l o ms, aramercial idtchen. cwdin once room, driti;V t t m, lounges i�rtd
readins roorns. The site develapmenr lncoqwates two taansition roads and rlrirg
lets,, ciwl gradIn sag export work achy surfa Feature Impravements, and
irri t ?rt avd tsr Wscaon&
1990 — 2W4 City of, Lomita I lfathaway Park lrmpfwernenis
A5 Co4structiort Manager I prm6ded consifuctimn s for the
ifttallAVon of new pea ",nd equ,Gprnent .at Hathaway Park,
OP pwiect Manner
1"8—ZWA City of Lsaraiita j MuttiW4e CIP Prq)eds
Construction P41 arwAr anis snip"tor for capital Improvement projeM IV, the Gly
r; Wng From street repak to the, constfuction of r mvnt7J fad -lilies.
C=41"+ a -sdiedvlod appynprlawdesign s��m, revkWng wmonudplants
and spedficaUon, peppared or supepiiffed the pr ration of Wd p=kages.
revl ng dads and p:rcaWin gena -al onginev.Ing open swn a uring cmistrutUon.
Tracked ayl projea torrespandence using EVeditft,
y .a
INTERWIST
ONSULIMG
GROUP
Wma IVnterwo0tgrp.eem
it bVt A YJ ON
CdAW.I 66
tem A&M U,iR+,wift
cetArt f,
IVII
PROF asSaONAL
,A€FrLIAIIONI
QW,grotlWA
d A
ftrniro Herrera
10T constragUan d PMJ*Ctfi r
Ramiro bangs mme than 28 gears of successful tli��st pr rltat�n �n �r�
nstrar6a t prWarrffling, DMIM arm Mrtstmt on Malagment e rE W flt
large, complex cominvcW, PuNic buitdioo and Infr vaure f�fMas thr'oughe-at
Ndiveme exWence alfa ft`vr., to Wing a <Jea.r under%and ng and cels deraye
deMh to any Prajeta a antro ul'mg to Ott suCM3 f,2W of all Pro; M
n € of mutt(s lJR= daVlir projects in ram <ibTar€ ,, LEE0, W'I&fV- fire
,
. Jwu. w�!*r cmtrs., My fiap peplear., hmWng devdapments, and Aquatic
CfIttM, and Parks.
ita it has a en � it tit do t lafrwa". ee k with fry tem stal�id
ae the b enw r4 Prsa, t; are wt a ed .end RW, r at red�t�ie and alt
rr ara i ^,rd r i, i ii st€'t 1 defsitiia, emotive COM. uwcaticM Wills, keim
arganLMIaan, :and paWva a"roach rcwlts in the "vWut comrle6on of the
projeM he manag*&
FROJ407, $P92CIFIC kXF'vRriFCE
vAWr :r I unstruvaun Marm er
I^terwest Gorlvrrf,iiroup 12011 — Present
Pefrfarrms a waTIety of T�structlan rtaniagement ser tri sew ra s=h2rf.,
�¢ifp2nt� cti;�rrt�.
Construction Nawa r
City of histn6ngtan Peach I CM: 0urce,1ne, J 2i — 2011
R&4wnmWt- !e* daily ofi4te congruct2an rnaragement for the mnst7uttlran of a six-
nuuding r crroax during e*goin WaW. Operations and Utflfty Yard aperafions,
l'ar Pr'aa= Mar
Oitnp Courtly Dee- mw3t of Education � midis LIS Cern rry �, 2WS ._, MM
itesponsibin fog r r str+aet ra ce related to Omw reVesentaVAn, design
maiaument, DSAS apyrx r? Grp end bid- Lty and wnstmclabiNty r im,
cr tracty gum soli frons,, and sthedvie r&W s for a prop $17 rraai€ f
b0dir4S carnpipsl ted in T-ovot4le.Va ev,
lr t MMMEament
Harris & A!=JatCI% j Mg — 7
Prod project oversight and rrRanagiad staff for the bvomr rdrm And p Je ;
City of ftneho Wrage $15M
PuVic: LibraTy 11ii16 ng
566
na Raia Vile alp Housing
IM
Fiv StaOn 401 and 002 R a�t9i s
'Llty of Pkft besen SAIM
VW-,tws Ce—der (LEF-D SlWr) CevtMed
WA
Carisarate Yard Expan4on projea
$10
-wefreedom PatkPr*ar
512M
Calif+t mr a VdIa Rousi Puss t & M
M
Lawne f?41=.5 Housing llesrcra an
_3irl --
�NTERWEST
CCtl3U:- T NG
CIROUP
airy+k+tAnt 0*W0*Igt.9"g*M
iii coartnI "td maw 3gn-lull
ire Diego County Water Authwfty 12002 - 2003
deskp mrdinatar for the SKWA $20 ,14, OG.OW sq, ft administration
Bray desWVbuPd ptqsect Provided 0-T-ske conitruiWon managernent and
oversight services duging the canstmzttan and dme out phase,
Fmim Manager I C swu:t a Man -ager
Oly of �rvlae f1tr ¢av park P.001 N -00a 1202 - 3003
Respam1ble for nstructlen servim and an to fafdy icm taasm or uon
AN the tarni"ittan of USM HeAtage Park aquatic complex. Tbe prap7ct. was
t to and a =W -use aquatic fadigy for the Oty, amine iiWd S600l
Nsttict, and swim dubs-
PA*Vt meager 1 QMVU410ft VAnwr
City of Culver City Samar Citizens C Ater 1 20M - 2W2
Oe,slgn fevim ve- �o a, Wdd award serAces, and can-ite =strucdon
t i s t fW the $810, O - ft Senior Center.
i rpi-ect Mamavr I Cmistruolon Manager
Oty of Comm (V 119% - 199,2
ProrOded project and zonst=t n mtnagemmt ser + fut 45M flawwood Park
Impram-mens pmjett. SOW included mu ti-pb&geti rPn*Q *n el 7 years to An
existing Oly fW1 Complex f=ted or, a 17 -acre sfte. The construction effort Wyalved
stata� d4mmEtlan ani# staff gelocation [it* temporary facalilles to constr"t,
M Senior Centev P, $12 Transp t4rtjous Fa riity �$ISNI Ccsmmanity Cen<
r
Oty of La Quipta € 1 -1992
Construction management service. far the $ISM, 45,OW stj, t Oty of Oty Nati
pmject Responsibiv for day -to day mspo to Co• "stor Wilt. submittals,
dpi r n i1 ,
nnaliatlog Cm's, and aaa€ nl� p iEng quailly and gene. -al carnpflance
to �^E Cont—art d=ME.AtS,
capitalimtnt P144Fir
I „-, 1
Managed a vane -IO of projects for vans., Chy of unta€n V#,- € a:�� City of
Bunn le.
The prolAd was $IGM,, 23-b t 1-37 owpasx in 91rawrAvood, Terms.
3t$ —
Les Chapman Jr.
.. .,.
Public baks 6Aor
N T i t f E E T Les h4j w*rked in the ronstruetion industry fo- 212 years and icings a
CONUwealth of eIrpr en and L-**Ae fge having sea
sl ¢urisd€etiors In
Caldsrnla. He hal scAeed various poRtions im the consimiakon, grub
www, z n r a r ww, k. , and watt serer areas. his attdbutm consA of beir4 vavy hard-
waMng, hwm organized, ala e, pumival and a problem sd�w ur4er
any Oevrrace.
Les makes a d" fW& M. staff an4 t
i- He wwh to help Pki, understand the protem aid pn¢
as u w d C44WO through , pl"d t mnarrru cation skiks, les has rte' swards for is
REG STHAVT N1
Cfit7 FICA77 PPI
PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIFENCIE
ca"MM ftwi > aakw-F, PUMC works t pectear
2M—Pfewril IftwwestCansulting6roup JLmAngales
tes peri°am- s a varael► 6f Publit worms int �<91 i s s t r ie its
throughout southern California.
Pubfir Works I Con-Atu ion
1s — 4tntenvest Consulting Group 1 Rk Grove
Au�Ved to the 0tv al Elk Grow to supp€art thL- mwmnly inspWion,gr W.
the stv, m water impnllon group, field -Ing constcrg nn related service
requests and serves as the Wont officer for the zwstructitan insp-CE a
tearer_ He aBsa provided Mx. ,. rraanapment for tntemest Coeniclting-with
rt rds w O.e Inspecters trucks and vePtstle malotenancc As new
impedors we hired, Lft is respuristble fcw aN n °-hirg, activities to Include
safety wientatloo, internal pwvssm, vehWe and til &%bunement aotl
generai pros assmiated Wim a new employee, as well �s 1,mj*rWm
��ati tanterrar�S.
2001 to 2034 Kaltkfos ape CcmwWng SeWtxs IDemAr, CO
Under Ow direct superwslon of the owner,, He performed warranty
lnsmtlurr3-for :nu ou;ti .aagert�nt nrta Hyrtl} E r l int
tfse Eot2attt Wsro arena for a 3--perum opetaOon, Performed alt; pumhihst
as alk -,:ht 7;s for ecteptance of vW,&.-ts and _gyrated punc lists..
$chedigied contracters and subc tractom obtalrwd ne sary per niM
sr : rakd all necftwry jZenq put&pns, sche0j,-etl 4 awemiV
mat eatals tesoh3 ao6 wfdtmed :all of the owmee,% * past t
1ngwMon5, RespansibFe to insur•:a tompliance with the Oaos and
sp i#i ti the compleWm, and tlmetmm of punfhhst repairs,
camplfaftce with traffi-C 0000t, PWM anI sitfi° re.S afat`?On_
+ _1
Stuart Blake-sley
Fire Maminer I Fire Pr ion Anspzctor
INTERWEV
CONSUL11"C71 Stuart brfts Mwv than 30 years of Irve knckmry knowledge and experience hawg
GROUP
worked as a fireman and parameclic for aeo*JV 20 ywrs and the W1,10 years as j
Ere plan miAvw and lftipvntoy. He aniline WIS Ws.1 MAINng and ha s.-an kxpeio-nce
F-led Fae PiutecObn Plan Neiiew and
n the MW to provide thomufM and dem-
�nspecflan servim to the ca is we wrve,
"M commounfty sw&& arA ftditation provWmz a solid backVnund MY de79vulng
I DUC A I I ON tmely, accurate, and eWdent re&Y4 In zccon�anmth fedw
the state, , , .31,3rd�
tog
A% VvAdrz T"hwlop t=l 4WA. HIS collaboravve'approaEb bfinvis might to Ole projim jnd- rewimilan to
81dW OAM I 140rard, rA any potential problems.
AS. Fee Sdenw. ZWI
patarroe'r- ur"�W"' IM F-Xpalk�P-NC2
CkAW. Ceitp I OtuAr, CA
Fke Mans 00tra"er
a# a I S I Nk A T 10 N S 2012 - Pptsent Inte4wftt CIMSMIUAR Group
C I It T I F % C A T 10 it S Hre Plans Exarririar pWonring tomr. then-Kva fire plan review and inspection Ior
Xc COMIkate, Uar fVe p o rt to t5 for
la CkMACEW, U.W
XC CEAUM. UPC We fnspmwrjIqre Plans Examiner
CA Re
X010--20.11 01y of AmeKrm Canyon
Pwf*rrr,*kd fres plan f eV-ew of builduW, fire a4rm vi-qems, fire spTMId'et? systems
jqd fife pump and fire
kra
Remue wvm 1 Fire NansftarnineT
Rem"SweW42
Te"01 RMW Ms - 2011 Pelaluma Fire Department
';W*WWW PewmL-d fare pli.in timew of WIW rig, firs a*m symems, We%prinMer sygeru
Car& W4 VM MMW opeqftas
F", Pn,6wnLan !A and fte Vimp:
FIM Pm*RWn 2A
I" pwkqnne N, Me Mipector H
Fite Prr"2C 2W4 - 20ag City of Sari Ralaef Fre Department
Fffe Wevntm4n 3A
F)WWWeIW-3R P�wdarrrsiptj Ere Inspectim services
F%M IWn5LVtW IA
PC-911 Am tnspmw
-Pee MalmnMt a 2003;-tis Novato Fre Panwiun 01svict.
F*e hMV Wor IA Ped4onned fire inpwalar, semi for the City 4of Ncriato
qwt! C4#MWW 3A
Firm WnMr/ftmMee"it
1430-2001 City of Fremcmt Fire Depa-itmvat
mefighter/EmT
1920-1981 A -My of Salinas Fire DepaMment.
-1mvierg EIT
Annette Bc
"A A
I sonfor Plan's EX*MTM87
"t
ARnene has experience ppAo 061afrty. archheMur-Al. Medwical, PIUMWDZ
INTERWEST t4let l lea3t, fire fsphriklers, alarms, hAwd suppression, etc.), auessMilly and stmcturai
C 0 NSU LT I NO reviews in reg&-atiol., rnuttffam*f4 and torr miercial projects, �ndi,,dlng spedafty reilews
GROUP of OSMPD� .11consed dinics, industrial fat.111tife'. and W.Aporal tale
faciftles. TK-% valusible experience Is also e�hdenl ire that Annette spedarit" in warkint
dkecgy Wilft.applIcants, de-ggilipm ;god jurisdictions, hi-MRg wmassfully swvad the the
cmval val* and Nevada. She approa&a plan teview with ugVique k-nmvWge
wh1e balIptilig t1w deltwry of vm* and accurate revkws and rmalng responsive a-,d
appraachabk to the pubtir- Mnene Is eWernely Wilted In all disdplines requi-red to
P If a 7 a 5 9 successfuliv "proltds, to appf",
kw%; bwwmr S09-cer-le EXPFRIIENCK
JOUICATION unia pfams fumIner
M, " Ir&e",& 2W7 - PwAmt InTemms-1.1 Consulting Grmsp
Fremo. CA
"2M Umd project rnanaW peffaMWC camprohMiW Plaft Mview MW lent rgigl=
jerAm in 4:a1kfornla. ReVms res dantlal arA Mm4esklmtfal plans for tompAmce VAth
R f G I S 'r A A T 0 N S CariforWri gulldft Plaurnb, MechMical, Flearkal, Enerp, Green 8411-ding Standards,
C 18 ",E � 4 C A T 0 N 5 Fire C% WFPA %ndards, and Clfwna A=g%JtMty $taw.Urds; state and local
1Cr4Mft-oUafE4w bufting codes, polic" amendments, and ordinanm.
ftlm it r,*rnpwvV. Aulomatic fire sprinkler s+ em fm sinWe-sta3ry hazardous
Mair-fWS stwt�ge' fadlAy'
Hanford Medicat ftwftn, AW&vma" Oft spifnklarmd fire alarm syswms. for thlee-
stM apical office bid I d; ng, incl u Wrig ambu N41" srg rgi cal, tE Ific aid iffla*'08'cen ttT'
fire alarm systern for singe-stmMulfi-parpose
MuMple Walmart Stwtm Automatle fire spr1nklvrsv%Ww, W, sir4eMMY mercantile
Chinese Wl&am ftdd fire supommW system for rt-slautamt Ndlity.
Deowwr
1977-1978 A.-4tonwVc Sponkler Caep. of merles
As a fire sprinlfar Winer, es-Umalor, €i Man er, lead 43ealgclel? and deslga
nagerr, Laralyn has designed fire sprinlder SWffm W Molar prajects each
,Sacramento In a nal A:rpnrt Tensa nal 6 and Sutttr Rosg%C Haspital, but 4ISO
waver supply €ai uWans for v4ral pr*JKU uMog 1WFFA 3142.
Loradyn Davis
.,
$enter Fire PlantExaminer
INTERWEST
GR011ip
elate Fire Plans Eimminaf
'fivWW.Intoff"
7 — Pt a Wterwesi aarrsf-jadrg Group
Pr of Rr'4' F Rs Exaftner perfonn&ng c4r apr r'nswe &* Sprinkler pl,�R rvilew far
rituslurlWkwana narthe4,n CalloWia.
Ree wjolm Flirt IWOW
6 lei 30r61?wa Review cam4am
10 U c A S r 0 04
iWO-200.6 GAY of Sacramento
AA, ! &%- nt zM torr*
PerfaTmed firs plan wAew of rE " h4h-4se buMdir4s, fire alsarm vptems in high-
rtA duff 0W
Ase t lDdiogs,, 4m spfinkkn. stems kv major mWmWaW x aP,= ! as The
r , enade, and of ilre pump and Ari sor*W sWems for blg -oiled, rambuoWMe
6� k G 15 14'9 A t 10 'N I;
gora W, occrpuncles wdi as S arn's Club.
CItATIF3CAT10MS
1 fttlib56` rA C?ZAo at uc &Wa
i .1��2a�slf
brM06 t t9WV& a Fite ftwftstw
! awcz�1n wrttr= ars suet ti as Asrr:e.r. Aul:Gmatic Spri;aidery Capi iaP, lo -I ►,
Aae'-
r Me Vx
9MMdJ AMd &Mptft Gtr ell QUI t4 Wow;
Ids U
Lead D r
r+,rr-UM%WI .* 1x
MW,FIrPe%* yt WPIVn fire Rrnte,ctlon
Desip i nv$ar
2WS-2W9 5ltrap,�'ac Gtlttrw-t F#e Protection
naslv Maas er
199tv 2M S.imWs ex GrFmAI We Protection
Lrf PJ6;J2+tt .r"itr
1 35-i nn UIAW Fare Prot4mVor! FAgInev-lra Imo.,
�r+ea�'�3�rnat�r
1979.1985 Ate?!£" Fart''ProtKNon
0034mr
M-1979 Grinnell, Fire Pmtr?c ibn
Deowwr
1977-1978 A.-4tonwVc Sponkler Caep. of merles
As a fire sprinlfar Winer, es-Umalor, €i Man er, lead 43ealgclel? and deslga
nagerr, Laralyn has designed fire sprinlder SWffm W Molar prajects each
,Sacramento In a nal A:rpnrt Tensa nal 6 and Sutttr Rosg%C Haspital, but 4ISO
waver supply €ai uWans for v4ral pr*JKU uMog 1WFFA 3142.
ATTACHMENT 8
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
CITE' OF'.COSTA ME' SA
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of June, 2012 .("Effective
Date"), by and between the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation ("City"), and
Melad and Assoc. Inc., 5907 Warner Ave., Suite 161, Huntington Beach, Calif. 92649, a
California corporation ("Consultant').
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent
contractor to Melad and Assoc. Inc. as more fully described in Consultant's Proposal attached as
Exhibit "A"; and
B. WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise
contemplated within California Government Code, Section 37103, and holds all necessary
licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and
C. WHEREAS, City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described in
Exhibit "A" (the "Project") and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection
with the services to be performed; and
D. WHEREAS, no official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions
of California Government Code, Sections 1090-1092, in the subject matter of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.0. SERVICES PROVEDED BY CONSULTANT
1.1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide the professional services described in
Consultant's Proposal, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein
by this reference.
1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their respective fields
and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by
professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound
professional practices. It is understood that in the exercise of every aspect of its role, within the
scope of work, consultant will be representing the City of Costa Mesa, and all of its actions,
communications, or other work, during its employment, under this contract is under the direction
of the department. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may affect its
performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect
Consultant's performance of this Agreement.
Consultant shall be solely and completely responsible for conditions of the job -site,
including safety of all persons and property during performance of the work, and the Consultant
shall fully comply with all State, Federal and other laws, rules, regulations, and orders relating to
the safety of the public and workers.
—32/1—
The right of the Engineer or -the City's Representative to conduct construction review _ or
observation of the Consultant's performance shall not include review or observation of the
adequacy of the Consultant's safety measures in, on, or near the construction site.
Construction materials and equipment may only be stored in streets, roads, or sidewalk areas if
approved by the Engineer.
1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City. Consultant agrees to perform all the work to
the complete satisfaction of the City and within the hereinafter specified. Evaluations of the
work will be done by the City Clerk or her designee. if the quality of work is not satisfactory,
City in its discretion has the right to:
(a) Meet with Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the
matters of concern;
(b) Require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is
satisfactory; and/or
(c) Terminate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth -
1.4. Warranty. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this
Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws including,
but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and
safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers' compensation insurance and safety
in employment; and ail other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from
and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every
nature and description including attorneys' fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered
against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which
may be incurred by reason of Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
1.5. Non-discrimination. in performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage
in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their
race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical handicap, medical condition, marital
status, sexual gender or sexual orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the
Government Code.
1.6. Non -Exclusive Agreement Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into
agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this
Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services
contemplated by this Agreement.
1.7. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set
forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written
consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ
other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant's sole cost
PSA 11
S 2,s —
and expense.
1.8. Confidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have
access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and
employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other
information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement
are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization
by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall
be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this
Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
2.1. Compensation. As compensation for the provision of services outlined in Exhibit
"A" and in accordance with this agreement, Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee
schedule set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Consultant's
total compensation shall not exceed five hundred thirty six thousand, one hundred twenty Dollars
($536,120.00).
2.2. Additional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services
provided outside the scope of services specified in the Consultant's Proposal or in an amount
exceeding $536,120.00 unless the City or the Project Manager for this Project, prior to
Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is
specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or
additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable.
2.3. Method of Billing. Consultant may submit invoices to City supervisor for
approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be
based on the total of all Consultants' services which have been completed to City's sole
satisfaction as of the date the invoice is created. City shall pay Consultant's invoice within forty-
five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the
services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion_ Any
additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement. shall be designated as
"Additional Services" and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where
applicable, on all invoices.
2.4. Records and Audits. Records of Consultant's services relating to this Agreement
shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be
made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient
times for a period of three (3) years from the Effective Date.
3.0. TIW OF PERFORMANCE
3.1. Commencement and Completion of Work. The professional serviwes to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective
Date of this Agreement. Failure to commence work in a timely manner and/or diligently pursue
work to completion may be grounds for termination of this Agreement.
PSA 11
3.2. Excusable Delays. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of
performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts
shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, material shortages, compliance with
laws or regulations, riots, acts of war., or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a
ply
33 Liquidated Damages. In the event of inexcusable delays, for each consecutive
calendar day after the time specified in Section 4.1, Consultant shall pay to the City or have
withheld from moneys due it, the daily sum of $100.00.
4.0. TERM AND TFAMINA ION
4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a
period of 12 months ending on June 30, 2013, unless previously terminated as provided herein or
as otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. This Agreement may be extended four (4)
additional one (1) year renewal periods upon mutual agreement of the City and the Consultant.
4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of
canceling, suspending or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated
by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing written notice to Consultant.
The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of
termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering
services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City.
4.3. Compensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for
reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including
the date of City's written notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be
prorated as to the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in
accordance with the fees set forth herein, In ascertaining the professional services actually
rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall
be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings,
and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the
City or in the possession of the Consultant.
4.4. Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents
prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to,
finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings,
maps and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination
notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific
written authorization from Consultant shall be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal
expense to Consultant.
5.0. INSURANCE
5.1. Minimum Scone and Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain; maintain, and
keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement all of the following minimum
scope of insurance coverages with an insurance company admitted to do business in California,
rated "A," Class X, or better in the most recent Bests Key Insurance Rating Guide, and
PSA 11
-3 2 7
approved by City:
(a) Commercial general liability, including premises -operations,
products/completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket
contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily
injury with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence. if such insurance
contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this
Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(b) Business automobile liability for owned vehicles, hired, and non -owned
vehicles, with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence for bodily injury
and property damage.
(c) Workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California.
Consultant agrees to waive, and to obtain endorsements from its workers'
compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers'
compensation insurance policy against the City, its officers, agents,
employees, and volunteers arising from work performed by Consultant for
the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise
under their workers' compensation insurance policies.
(d) Professional errors and omissions C E&O") liability insurance with policy
limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined
single limits, per occurrence and aggregate. Architects' and engineers'
coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. if the policy is
written as a "claims -made" policy, the retro date shall be prior to the start
of the contract work.. Consultant shall obtain and maintain, said E&O
liability insurance during the life of this Agreement and for three years
after completion of the work hereunder.
5.2. Endorsements. The commercial general liability insurance policy and business
automobile liability policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a) Additional insureds: "The City of Costa Mesa and its elected and
appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are
additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with
the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises
owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; automobiles owned., leased,
hired, or borrowed by the Consultant.."
(b) Notice: "Said policy shall not terminate, be suspended, or voided, nor
shall it be cancelled, nor the coverage or limits reduced, until thirty (30)
days after written notice is given to City_
(c) Other insurance: "The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary
3',29
PSA 11
insurance as respects the City of Costa Mesa, its officers, officials, agents,
employees, and volunteers. Any other insurance maintained by the City of
Costa Mesa shall be excess and not contributing with the insurance
provided by this policy."
(d) Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City of Costa Mesa., its officers,
officials, agents, employees, and volunteers.
(e) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
5.3. Deductible or Self Insured Retention. If any of such policies provide for a deductible
or self-insured retention to provide such coverage, the amount of such deductible or self-insured
retention shall be approved in advance by City. No policy of insurance issued as to which the
City is an additional insured shall contain a provision which requires that no insured except the
named insured can satisfy any such deductible or self-insured retention.
5.4. Certificates of Insurance: Consultant shall provide to City certificates of
insurance showing the insurance coverages and required endorsements described above, in a
form and content approved by City, prior to performing any services under this Agreement.
5.5. Non -limiting: Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way,
the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which Consultant
may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.
6.0. GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1. Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the
parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior
writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by
the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail
over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including
exhibits to this Agreement.
6.2. Representatives. The Chief Executive Officer for the City of Costa Mesa ("City's
CEO") or his or her designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement
and may issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of the City, called for
by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.
Consultant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who
shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of
Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement.
6.3. Project Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with
Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.
�] PSA 11
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and, be its -
agent in all consultations with City during the term of this Agreement. Consultant or its Project
Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City.
6.4, Notices: Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications
concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery,
facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be
deemed served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal
delivery; b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 48
hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such
communication is sent through regular United States mail.
IF TO CONSULTANT:
Melad and Assoc. Inc.
8907 Warner Ave., Suite 161
Huntington Beach, Calif. 92647
Tel: 714.848.0487
Fax: 714.848.7027
Attn: Burt Morgan
E-mail: meladassoc@aol.com
IF TO CITY:
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel: 714-754-5604
Fax: 714-7544856
Attn: Khanh Nguyen
6.5. Drug --free Workplace Policy. Consultant shall provide a drug-free workplace by
complying with all provisions set forth in City's Council Policy 100-5, attached hereto as Exhibit
"D" and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's failure to conform to the requirements
set forth in Council Policy 100-5 shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and shall
be cause for immediate termination of this Agreement by City.
6.6. Attorneys' Fees: in the event that litigation is brought by any parry in connection
with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all
costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the
exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms,
conditions, or provisions hereof.
6.7. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the
laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of
laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto
agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in
Orange County, California.
6.8. Assignment: Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign,
transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of Consultant's interest in this Agreement without
City's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance
shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this
Agreement. Regardless of City's consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of
Consultant's obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder
for the term of this Agreement.
T PSA ii
�V
6.9_ Indemnification and Hold Harmless Consultant agrees -to defend, indemnify, hold
free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, at Consultant's
sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings
brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees arising out of the
performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the work
undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense -obligation provided for hereunder shall
apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its
employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action,
complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of the
Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action,
complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and
employees based upon the work performed by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized
subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Consultant, its employees, and/or
authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or
indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole active
negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other
indemnity provisions contained either in the City's specifications or Consultant's Proposal,
which shall be of no force and effect.
6.10. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an
independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur
any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent_
Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreemem- Consultant shall not, at any time,
or in any manner, represent that it or any of its or employees are in any manner agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all
payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation,
Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers,
agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the
services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any
and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the
independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to
indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable
worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees
due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of
Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under
this paragraph.
6.11. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee,
agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement
System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant
shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or
employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or
subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions,
which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.
FSA 11
Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or
ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors
providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby
agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City,
including but not limited to eligibility to enroll is PERS as an employee of City and entitlement
to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions
for PERS benefits.
6.12. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to
Consultant's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render
any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require.
6.13. Ownershit) of Documents. All findings, reports, documents, information and data
including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, files and tapes furnished or prepared by
Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be
and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information
shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City.
Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use
of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure
to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages,
losses, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from City's use of such
documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete
documents furnished by Consultant- Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports,
documents, information, data, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs,
files audio tapes or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized
representative, at no additional cost to the City.
6.14. Public Records Act Disclosure: Consultant has been advised and is aware that all
reports, documents, information and data including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or
files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, and provided to City may
be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California
Government Code Section 6250 et. seq.). Exceptions to public disclosure may be those
documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the California
Government Code Section 6254.7, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret.
The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is
designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the
disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure
is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.
6.15. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California
applicable to Consultant's services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the
Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seg.) and Government Code Section
1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform
work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that
would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or subconsultants to
PSA 11
332-
abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute.
6.16. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results
under this .Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation
as may be required by the City's representative, regarding any services rendered under this
Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to
Consultant occurs, then Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design
drawings, estimates and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct
the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard
to the correction.
6.17. Prohibited Employment_ Consultant will not employ any regular employee of
City while this Agreement is in effect.
6.18. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any
of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent
this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be
deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and diose of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by
reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced.
6.19. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and
negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as
expressly provided herein.
6.20. No Third Party BeneficiM Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole
benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental
beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third parry shall have any right in, under or to this
Agreement.
6.21. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement
are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify; explain or to be a full or
accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement_
6.22. Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting
of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with
respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties
and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof
favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this
Agreement-
6.23.
greement6.23. Amendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective
successors and assigns may amend this Agreement.
6.24. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or
compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a
waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of
PSA 11
this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative
of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy
in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in
respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
623. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the
offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of
this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party, is materially
impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent
jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good
faith negotiations.
6.26. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall
constitute one agreement.
6.27. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the
parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said
parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this
Agreement.
IN VaTNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by
and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
CEO of Costa Mesa
Date:
Date:
73 � PSA 11
CONSULTANT
Date:
gnature Name and Title
Social Security or Taxpayer ID Number
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Risk Management
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
Of the City of Costa Mesa
Date:
Date:
Date: /—,
Date:
PSA 3]
�"
CITY COUNCIL POLICY 100-5
S1 ECT
POLICY
EFFECTIVE
PAGE
NUAMER
BATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
1 of 3
BACKGRO:1 11
Under the Federal Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, passed as part of omnibus drug legislation
enacted November 18, 1988, contractors and grantees of Federal funds must certify that they will
provide drug-free workplaces. At the present time, the City of Costa Mesa, as a sub -grantee of
Federal funds under a variety of programs, is required to abide by this Act. The City Council has
expressed its support of the national effort to eradicate drug abuse through the creation of a
Substance Abuse Committee, institution of a City-wide D.A.R.E. program in all local schools
and other activities in support of a drug-free community. This policy is intended to extend that
effort to contractors and grantees of the City of Costa Mesa in the elimination of dangerous drugs
in the workplace.
PURPOSE
It is the purpose of this Policy to:
1. Clearly state the City of Costa Mesa's commitment to G drug-free society.
2. Set forth guidelines to ensure that public, private, and nonprofit organizations receiving
funds from. the City of Costa Mesa share the commitment to a drug-free workplace.
POLICY
The CEO, under direction by the City Council, shall take the necessary steps to see that the
following provisions are included in all contracts and agreements entered into by the City of
Costa Mesa involving the disbursement of funds.
1. Contractor or Sub -grantee hereby certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by--
a.
y:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in
Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's workplace, specifically the job site or location
included , in this contract, and specifying the actions that will be taken against the
employees for violation of such prohibition;
- )�% 0
PSA 11
1.
SUBJECT
POLICY
E + + CTIFV E
PAGE
1`1 UMEBER
DATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
2 of 3
b. Establishing a Drug -Free Awareness Program to inform employees about:
1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
2. Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs;
and
4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations
occurring in the workplace;
c. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the
contract be given a copy of the statement required by subparagraph A;
d. Notifying the employee in the statement required by subparagraph 1 A that, as a
condition of employment under the contract, the employee will:
1. Abide by the terms of the statement; and
2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation
occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction;
e. Notifying the City of Costa Mesa within ten (10) days after receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 from an employee or otherwise receiving the actual notice of
such conviction;
£ Taking one of the following actions within thirty (30) days of receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 with respect to an employee who is so convicted:
1. Taping appropriate personnel action again&* such an employee, up to and
including termination; or
2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local
health agency, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
PSA 11
SUBJECT
POLICY
EFFECT'IV'E
PANE
NtJli'IBER
DATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
of 3
g. Making a good faith effort to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation
of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 F, inclusive.
2. Contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be deemed to be in violation of this Policy if the City
of Costa Mesa determines that:
a. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has made a false certification under paragraph 1
above;
b. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has violated the certification by failing to carry out
the requirements of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 G above;
c. Such number of employees of Contractor and/or sub -grantee have been convicted
of violations of criminal drug statutes for violations occurring in the workplace as
to indicate that the contractor and/or sub -grantee has failed to make a good faith
effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
3_ Should any contractor and/or sub -grantee be deemed to be in violation of this Policy
pursuant to the provisions of 2 A, B, and C, a suspension, termination or debarment
proceeding subject to applicable Federal, State, and local laws shall be conducted. Upon
issuance of any final decision under this section requiring debarment of a contractor
and!or sub -grantee, the contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be ineligible for award of any
contract, agreement or grant from the City of Costa Mesa for a period specified in the
decision, not to exceed five (5) years. Upon issuance of any final decision
recommending against debarment of the contractor and/or sub -grantee, the contractor
andior sub -grantee shall be eligible for compensation as provided by law.
/CSG PSA
Q PSA 11
EXHIBIT A
,,1 2
MEl_A,D IANC ,ASSOCIATES
engineering ® code consultants
;< May 1, 2012
City of Costa Mesa
Building Safety
Attu: Keith Clarke -Building Official
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
SUBJECT: Request For Proposals To Provide Building Plan Check And Inspection
Services.
ME1AD & ASSOCIATES is pleased to submit a proposal to the City of Costa Mesa for
building plan check and inspections services. Our firm has been providing plan checking
and building inspection services, as well as other quality municipal -services, to numerous
cities in Southern California since 1981.
Our primary goal is to provide quality, professional, and cost-effective plan check and
inspection services to all of our client cities. The members of our staff include engineers,
building officials, plans examiners, building inspectors, and permit technicians, all
professionally registered and certified. Our ability to be responsive and flexible with
your staffing needs, as well as maintaining courteous and professional relationships with
homeowners, architects, engineers, and contractors, are valuable assets that we take
great pride in. Our past experience working with the City of Costa Mesa, has given us a
particular insight with the inner workings of the City's Building Department and other
departments, as well as becoming quite familiar with the City itself:
1IELAD & ASSOCIATES will provide qualified reviews and plain check for completeness
and conformance with all City Ordinances, State and Federal Regulations, and all
adopted Building, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy, Green, and ADA codes, as
well as the adopted NFPA standards as mandated by State Title 24 and applicable
ordinances. All reviews will be performed by our staff of certified engineers and plans
examiners, as well as meet all time table expectations. Please see table below.
Table 1— *Accelerated plan reviews start at the time the Accelerated Plan Review
Agreement is signed per your instruction. All turnaround times reflected are in calendar
New §j2ee Fmmly or iddi--lFamily 1040 5 days 5 gM
Residential Additions & Alterations 10 go 5 days $ Igs,
New +Co m►ercid or hWkstrial iogbLs 5 dxvs 5 days
Commercial or Industrial T.I. 10 days 5 gm 5 gffs
- 3-210
8907 warner ave., suite 18-1 9 huntington beach, ca 92647 ® (71 4) 846-0487
Melad & Associates has an on -staff courier, and can accommodate pick-ups and
deliveries within twenty-four hour notice. We can also provide overnight mail services if
desired. We will provide two copies of the plan check correction list, when plans are
returned to the City with comments.
It is understood that when required, members of our staff will be available to attend
meetings in the Building Department regarding plan check reviews, or may have to make
site visits regarding projects from time to time. Our office is located a mere 6.5 miles
away in nearby Huntington Beach, making it convenient for customers to meet with us in
our office, or for us to attend meetings on site or at the Building Department as needed.
Melad & Associates may be reached by mail at 8907 Warner Ave. Suite 161, Huntington
Beach, CA 92647, by phone at (714) 848-0487, by fax at (714) 848-7027, or by e-mail at
ineladass€ co a,aol.com.
We will provide ICC certified building inspectors at the City's request, qualified and
experienced with all applicable codes, State and Federal regulations, and City
Ordinances. It is understood that all inspectors shall maintain records of all
construction projects inspected, including a daily record of what was inspected, which
shall be recorded on the job card, office permit copy, and in the Building & Safety
computer system. All inspectors and penult technicians on staff have worked with
various permit tracking systems in several Southern California jurisdictions.
Melad & Associates has been providing plan check and inspection services for numerous
City Building Departments throughout Southern California since 1981. We have in the
past also staffed Building Officials, Permit Technicians, Administrative Std and Code
Enforcement Officers to various jurisdictions when needed. Listed below are the various
past and present Cities we have done work with.
Arcadia Gardena San Gabriel
Avalon Fountain Valley Santa Ana
Azusa La Habra Seal Beach
Buena park La Palma Signal Hill
Chino Long Beach South Gate
Claremont Lynwood Stanton
Compton Manhattan Beach Temecula
Costa Mesa Monrovia Tustin
Cypress Moreno Valley Vada Park
Dana Point Pasadena Westminster
Downey Pico Rivera Yorba Linda
Garden Grove Redondo Beach '
We have proudly served all of these Cities, and have had the pleasure of watching their
comm unities grow. Some of these Departments we have worked with for over twenty-five
years.
-M,
The experience and knowledge of our staff is the very backbone of Melad & Associates,
and having worked with Building Departments for over thirty years clearly shows Our
dedication in providing quality plan checking and inspection services. We would also
like to add that Melad & Associates strictly performs plan check and inspection services.
We do no engineering design work to avoid any conflict of interest with our clients.
Please see the table below for a list of our staff, their roles, and their qualifications.
Table 2 - Plan Check Staff
. ... ... .....
..........
......... . ..... ..
............ ............
1- wiig
. ..........
.................... . .............
...........
Jose D. Melad
State of California P.E. Lie. #C28095
Plan review of all types of
President
ICBO certified Plans Examiner, Building
buildings, Electdcal, Grew
!am!52r, Combination !as-�E
Buildin & Disabled Access
Jose Miran
—
State of California P.E. Lie. #C24913
Non -Residential Building Plan
Senior Plan Check
ICC cartified Building Official
Review
Engineer
ICBO certified Plans Examiner and Non -
Residential Ener M Plans Examiner
Anent Slick
-State of California P.E. Lie. #C25043
Structural Plan Review
Senior Structural
Ely Mamoyac
State of California P.E. Lie. #S3409
Structural. Plan Review
Senior Structural
eer
Raymundo. Go
State of California P.E. Lie. #M27284
Plumbing Review, Mechanical
Mechanical
& Title 24, Green Building
Jose Abamp= HI
State of California P.E. Lie. #C31994
Residential Building Review
Senior Plan Check
ICC certified Plans ex miner #62935
Engineer
ICBO certified EneW Plans Examiner
#94-5253, CAS - 315
Burt Morgan
ICC certified Building Official
Non -Structural Review of all
Senior Plan
ICC certified Plans Examiner
I
types of non-residential
Checker
buildings
Table 4 — Buildin
n Stag *`Ali Ins actors are ICCIICB® Certl ed
€ U1. . .
:.
...: , .
Chuck Feenstra
Over twenty years experience in general building inspections,
ICBG Building Inspector
administration, and construction. Former Senior Building ingm;tor
with time C4 of Seal Beach.
Chuck eta
Over twenty years experience in public works and general building
ICBG Building Inspector
inspections, administration, and construction. Former Bwldimmg
actor with time City of Seal Beach.
Brian Har
Over six years of experience in general building insl ections. Has
ICC Building Lector
worked for Melad & Associates in the Cities of Lynwood,
Co ton, and Manhattan Beach.
Terry Johnson
Over thirty years experience in building inspections and.
ICBG Building Inspector
supervision. Former Principal Building Inspector with the City of
& Building Official
Long Beach and also time Former Building Official with time City of
Los Alamitos.
Ricardo lazare BSC ,
Over twenty years experience in building inspection and plan
ICBO Building &
check. Former Pin Check. Engineer with the Cities of Tustin,
Combination inspector.
Pasadena, and Los Angeles.
ICBG Plans Examiner
Don Leaser
Over twenty years experience in building inspections and
ICBG Building, Plumbing,
construction. Former Building Inspector Supervisor with the City
and Structural Masonry
of South Gate.
actor
Table 5B — Hourly Rate Fee Schedule
Charges are based on a minimum of four hours upon each request of service.
* Mileage for Building Inspection Positions is $0.50 per mile if the City does not provide
transportation for performance of this duty.
*overtime hourly rates are based on a minimum of four hours upon each request of
We would like to thank the City of Costa Mesa for the opportunity to submit this
proposal. We have enjoyed serving the Building Department as well as the City of Costa
Mesa in the past, and look forward to getting the opportunity to do so again. We firmly
believe that we have the most highly trained, knowledgeable, and experienced staff in this
industry, and have no doubt that we can provide professional, thorough, and timely
service for your community.
I look forward to hearing from you, and should there be any specific areas not addressed
herein, or any further information that you may require, please do not hesitate to contact
us so that we may respond accordingly.
Sincerely,
Jose Melad
i President
Melad do Associates
RESUMES
MR. JOSE Da MELAD
PRESIDENT
MELAD AND ASSOCIATES
EDUCATION: Structural Engineering Major, M.S.C.E. Program, CSULB
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
Republic of the Philippines
CERTIFICATIONS: Registered Professional Civil Engineer
State of California, P.E., Lie. # C.E. 28095
Certified Plans Examiner, I.C.B.O.
Certified Building Inspector, I.C.B.O.
Certified Combination Inspector, I.C.B.O.
AFFILIATIONS: National Society of Professional Engineers
International Conference of Building Officials
American Construction Inspectors Association
International association of EIectrical Inspectors
California Building Officials
World Organization of Building Officials
Structural Engineers of Southern California
International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials
National Fire Protection Association
The Masonry Society
WORK EXPERIENCE:
1981 - PRESENT Melad And Associates. Inc., President
Providing Building Administration services to jurisdictions.
Service include Structural engineering plan review, code plan
checking, Fire Code review, code consultation and providing
general building inspection services on contract basis.
1982- 1987 City of Pica Rivera, Building Official
Part-time consulting Building Official in charge of all aspects of
the building division. Supervise inspectors and staff. Provide
plan review service on a contract bases.
1977-1981 City of Fountain Valley, Director of Building & Safety
In charge of the entire building department activities. Supervised
building personnel and consulted to public works department.
Oversee plan review services and maintenance of city buildings.
- -,3.q r] -
PAGE TWO
MR. JOSE MELAD
1977 City of Gardena, Plan Check Engineer
Provide plan checking and code review for
projects submitted to the city. Worked with
planning division and other city agencies.
1974-1977 City of Pico Rivera, Plan Checker/Assistant Bldg. Official
Plan Check all types of building construction plans
and other structures for compliance with all
city adopted codes and ordinances, State and Federal
laws as related to building and safety regulations.
1973-1974 City of Stanton, Building Inspector
(One-man Division) - In charge of all department activities,
such as plan checking of buildings, electrical, plumbing,
and mechanical plans including zoning for building code
compliance. General inspection on all types of construction.
Represent the City of Stanton in all meetings and seminars
pertaining to the Building Department activities.
1970-1973 City of Compton, Senior Building Inspector
- In charge of the Department of Building and Safety in the absence
of the Chief Building Oficial and performed plan checking and
general inspection.
i
1966-1970 Manila, Philippines, Assistant Civil Engineer
In charge of public works projects and transferred to building
_ construction and inspection division as a building engineer
inspector assigned to structural inspections of high-rise buildings.
RESUME
JOSE M. ABARQUEZ HI
EDUCATION: University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines
B.S. Civil Engineering, 1979
CERTIFICATES: Registered Civil Engineer, State of California, #51994, July 8, 1994
Certified Energy Plans Examiner, #94-5253
Certified Plans Examiner, ICC, #462935
Certified Access Specialist
AFFILIATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers
ICC Certified Member
WORK EXPERIENCE:
1988 - PRESENT Melad and Associates, Senior Plan Check Engineer
PIan Check of residential structures for compliance
with all city adopted codes and ordinances, State and
Federal laws as related to building and safety regulations.
1984- 1988 Wilson, Andros, Roberts & Noll, Design Engineer
Responsible for preparing structural calculations and drafting of plans as
well as investigation of existing structures. Projects involved steel, concrete
and masonry buildings . Also, refined company software on structural design.
1983- 1984 DCCD Engineering Corporation, Design Engineer
Evaluated the structural condition of the existing buildings and prepared
schematic plans and budgetary estimates for telephone exchanges.
1981 -1983 Petrophil Corporation, Project Engineer
Design and development of civil work projects related to bulk oil plant
operations. Tasks include the preparation of feasibility studies,
construction plans, bid documents and cost estimates, field inspection,
processing of contractor's bills and preparation of progress reports
— 3-dqq_
ATTACHMENT 9
- �35c-
PROFESSIONAL, SERVICES AGREEMENT
CITY OF COSTA MESA
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of June, 2012 ("Effective
Date"), by and between the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation ("City"), and
Scott Fazekas and Associates Inc., 9 Corporate Park, Suite 200, Irvine California 92606, a
California corporation ("Consultant").
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent
contractor to Scott Fazekas and Associates Inc. as more fully described in Consultant's Proposal
attached as Exhibit "A"; and
B. WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise
contemplated within California Government Code, Section 37103, and holds all necessary
licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated; and
C. WHEREAS, City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described in
Exhibit "A" (the "Project") and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection
with the services to be performed; and
D. WHEREAS, no official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions
of California Government Code, Sections 1090-1092, in the subject matter of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT
1.1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide the professional services described in
Consultant's Proposal, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein
by this reference.
1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their respective fields
and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by
professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound
professional practices. It is understood that in the exercise of every aspect of its role, within the
scope of work, consultant will be representing the City of Costa Mesa, and all of its actions,
communications, or other work, during its employment, under this contract is under the direction
of the department. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws that may affect its
performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect
Consultant's performance of this Agreement.
Consultant shall be solely and completely responsible for conditions .of the job -site,
including safety of all persons and property during performance of the work, and the Consultant
shall fully comply with all State, Federal and other laws, rules, regulations, and orders relating to
the safety of the public and workers.
The right of the Engineer or the City's Representative to conduct construction review or
observation of the Consultant's performance shall not include review or observation of the
adequacy of the Consultant's safety measures in; on, or near the construction site.
Construction materials and equipment may only be stored in streets, roads, or sidewalk areas if
approved by the Engineer.
1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City. Consultant agrees to perform all the work to
the complete satisfaction of the City and within the hereinafter specified. Evaluations of the
work will be done by the City Clerk or her designee. If the quality of work is not satisfactory,
City in its discretion has the right to:
(a) Meet with Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the
matters of concern;
(b) Require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is
satisfactory; and/or
(c) Terminate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.
1.4. Warranty. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this
Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws including,
but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and
safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers' compensation insurance and safety
in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from
and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every
nature and description including attorneys' fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered
against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which
may be incurred by reason of Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
1.5. Non-discrimination. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage
in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their
race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical handicap, medical condition, marital
status, sexual gender or sexual orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the
Government Code.
1.6. Non -Exclusive Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into
agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this
Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services
contemplated by this Agreement.
1.7. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set
forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written
consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ
other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant's sole cost
PSA 11
and expense.
1.8. Confidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have
access to financial, .accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and
employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other
information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement
are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization
by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall
be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this
Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
2.0. COMPENSATION AND BILLING
2.1. Compensation. As compensation for the provision of services outlined in Exhibit
"A" and in accordance with this agreement, Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee
schedule set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Consultant's
total compensation shall not exceed five hundred thirty six thousand, one hundred twenty Dollars
($536,120.00).
2.2. Additional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services
provided outside the scope of services specified in the Consultant's Proposal or in an amount
exceeding $536,120.00 unless the City or the Project Manager for this Project, prior to
Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is
specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or
additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable.
2.3. Method of Billing. Consultant may submit invoices to City supervisor for
approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be
based on the total of all Consultants' services which have been completed to City's sole
satisfaction as of the date the invoice is created. City shall pay Consultant's invoice within forty-
five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the
services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. Any
additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as
"Additional Services" and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where
applicable, on all invoices.
2.4. Records and Audits. Records of Consultant's services relating to this Agreement
shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be
made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient
times for a period of three (3) years from the Effective Date.
3.0. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
3.1. Commencement and Completion of Work. The professional services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective
Date of this Agreement. Failure to commence work in a timely manner and/or diligently pursue
work to completion may be grounds for termination of this Agreement.
PSA 11
3.2. Excusable Delays. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of
performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts
shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, material shortages, compliance with
laws or regulations, riots, acts of war, or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a
ply
3.3 Liquidated Damages. In the event of inexcusable delays, for each consecutive
calendar day after the time specified in Section 4.1, Consultant shall pay to the City or have
withheld from moneys due it, the daily sum of $100.00.
4.0. TERM AND TERMINA'T'ION
4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a
period of 12 months ending on June 30, 2013, unless previously terminated as provided herein or
as otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. This Agreement may be extended four (4)
additional one (1) year renewal periods upon mutual agreement of the City and the Consultant.
4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of
canceling, suspending or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated
by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing written notice to Consultant.
The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of
termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering
services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City.
4.3. Comtrensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for
reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including
the date of City's written notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be
prorated as to the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in
accordance with the fees set forth herein. In ascertaining the professional services actually
rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall
be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings,
and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the
City or in the possession of the Consultant.
4.4. Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents
prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to,
finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings,
maps and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination
notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific
written authorization from Consultant shall be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal
expense to Consultant.
5.0. INSURANCE
5.1. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain, maintain, and
keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement all of the following minimum
scope of insurance coverages -with an insurance company admitted to do business in California,
rated "A," Class X, or better in the most recent Best's Key Insurance Rating Guide, and
3�� - PSA 11
approved by City:
(a) Commercial general liability, including premises -operations,
products/completed operations, broad form property damage, blanket
contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily
injury with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence. If such insurance
contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this
Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(b) Business automobile liability for owned vehicles, hired, and non -owned
vehicles, with a policy limit of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00), combined single limits, per occurrence for bodily injury
and property damage.
(c) Workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California.
Consultant agrees to waive, and to obtain endorsements from its workers'
compensation insurer waiving subrogation rights under its workers'
compensation insurance policy against the City, its officers, agents,
employees, and volunteers arising from work performed by Consultant for
the City and to require each of its subcontractors, if any, to do likewise
under their workers' compensation insurance policies.
(d) Professional errors and omissions ("E&O") liability insurance with policy
limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00), combined
single limits, per occurrence and aggregate. Architects' and engineers'
coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If the policy is
written as a "claims made" policy, the retro date shall be prior to the start
of the contract work. Consultant shall obtain and maintain, said E&O
liability insurance during the life of this Agreement and for three years
after completion of the work hereunder.
5.2. Endorsements. The commercial general liability insurance policy and business
automobile liability policy shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a) Additional insureds: "The City of Costa Mesa and its elected and
appointed boards, officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers are
additional insureds with respect to: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant pursuant to its contract with
the City; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises
owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; automobiles owned, leased,
hired, or borrowed by the Consultant.."
(b) Notice: "Said policy shall not terminate, be suspended, or voided, nor
shall it be cancelled, nor the coverage or limits reduced, until thirty (30)
days after written notice is given to City.
(c) Other insurance: "The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary
PSA 11
insurance as respects the City of Costa Mesa, its officers, officials, agents,
employees, and volunteers. Any other insurance maintained by the City of
Costa Mesa shall be excess and not contributing with the insurance
provided by this policy."
(d) Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City of Costa Mesa, its officers,
officials, agents, employees, and volunteers.
(e) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
5.3. Deductible or Self Insured Retention. If any of such policies provide for a deductible
or self-insured retention to provide such coverage, the amount of such deductible or self-insured
retention shall be approved in advance by City. No policy of insurance issued as to which the
City is an additional insured shall contain a provision which requires that no insured except the
named insured can satisfy any such deductible or self-insured retention.
5.4. Certificates of Insurance: Consultant shall provide to City certificates of
insurance showing the insurance coverages and required endorsements described above, in a
form and content approved by City, prior to performing any services under this Agreement.
5.5. Non -limiting: Nothing in this Section shall be construed as limiting in any way,
the indemnification provision contained in this Agreement, or the extent to which Consultant
may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.
6.4. GENERAL PRONgSIONS
6.1. Entire Ageement: This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the
parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior
writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by
the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail
over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including
exhibits to this Agreement.
6.2. Representatives. The Chief Executive Officer for the City of Costa Mesa ("City's
CEO") or his or her designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement
and may issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of the City, called for
by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.
Consultant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who
shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of
Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement.
6.3. Project Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with
Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.
PSA 11
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and .be its
agent in all -consultations with City during the term of this Agreement. Consultant or its Project
Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City.
6.4. Notices: Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications
concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery,
facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be
deemed served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal
delivery; b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 48
hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such
communication is sent through regular United States mail.
IF TO CONSULTANT:
Scott Fazekas and Assoc. Inc.
9 Corporate Park, Suite 200
Ervine, Calif. 92606
Tel: 949.475.2901
Fax: 949.475.2560
Attn: Scott Fazekas
E-mail: sfairvine@aol.com
IF TO CITY:
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel: 714-754-5604
Fax: 714-754-4856
Attn: Khanh Nguyen
6.5. Drug-free Workplace Policy. Consultant shall provide a drug-free workplace by
complying with all provisions set forth in City's Council Policy 100-5, attached hereto as Exhibit
"D" and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant's failure to conform to the requirements
set forth in Council Policy 100-5 shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and shall
be cause for immediate termination of this Agreement by City.
6.6. Attorneys' Fees: In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection
with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all
costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the
exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms,
conditions, or provisions hereof.
6.7. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the
laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of
laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto
agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in
Orange County, California.
6.8. Assignment: Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign,
transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of Consultant's interest in this Agreement without
City's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance
shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this
Agreement. Regardless of City's consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of
Consultant's obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder
for the term of this Agreement.
c� PSA 11
6.9. Indemnification and Hold:Harmless Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold
free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, at Consultant's
sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings
brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees arising out of the
performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the work
undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall
apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its
employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action,
complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of the
Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action,
complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents and
employees based upon the work performed by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized
subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Consultant, its employees, and/or
authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or
indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole active
negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other
indemnity provisions contained either in the City's specifications or Consultant's Proposal,
which shall be of no force and effect.
6.10. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an
independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur
any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent.
Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time,
or in any manner, represent that it or any of its or employees are in any manner agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all
payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation,
Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers,
agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the
services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any
and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the
independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant .further agrees to
indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable
worker's compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees
due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of
Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under
this paragraph.
6.11. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee,
agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement
System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant
shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or
employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or
subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions,
which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.
6 _.. PSA 11
Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or
ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors
providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby
agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City,
including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement
to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions
for PERS benefits.
6.12. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to
Consultant's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render
any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require.
6.13. Ownership of Documents. All findings, reports, documents, information and data
including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, files and tapes furnished or prepared by
Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be
and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information
shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City.
Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use
of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure
to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages,
losses, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from City's use of such
documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete
documents furnished by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports,
documents, information, data, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs,
files audio tapes or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized
representative, at no additional cost to the City.
6.14. Public Records Act Disclosure: Consultant has been advised and is aware that all
reports, documents, information and data including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or
files famished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, and provided to City may
be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California
Government Code Section 6250 et. seq.). Exceptions to public disclosure may be those
documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the California
Government Code Section 6254.7, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret.
The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is
designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the
disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure
is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.
6.15. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California
applicable to Consultant's services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the
Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et se .) and Government Code Section
1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and
subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform
work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that
would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or subconsultants to
PSA 11
abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute,
6.16. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work and results
under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation
as may be required by the City's representative, regarding any services rendered under this
Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to
Consultant occurs, then Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design
drawings, estimates and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct
the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard
to the correction.
6.17. Prohibited Employment. Consultant will not employ any regular employee of
City while this Agreement is in effect.
6.18. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any
of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent
this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be
deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and
conditions of this Agreement -and. those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by
reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced.
6.19. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and
negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as
expressly provided herein.
6.20. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole
benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental
beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this
Agreement.
6.21. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement
are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or
accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
6.22. Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting
of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with
respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties
and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof
favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this
Agreement.
6.23. Amendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective
successors and assigns may amend this Agreement.
6.24. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or
compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a
waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of
0 - PSA 11
this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative
of the party against whom. enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right ox remedy
in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in
respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
6.25. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the
offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of
this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party, is materially
impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent
jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good
faith negotiations.
6.26. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall
constitute one agreement.
6.27. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the
parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said
parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by
and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written.
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A municipal corporation
Date:
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
Date:
CEO of Costa Mesa
PSA 11
CONSULTANT
Date: 7-1A
Signature ./
ks
Name and Title
Social Security or Taxpayer ID Number
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date:
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
Date:
Risk Management
AS TO CONTENT:
Date:
Project Manager
ATTEST:
Date:
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
Of the City of Costa Mesa
- �3 ( Z PSA 11
CITY COUNCIL POLICY 100-5
SUBMCT
POLIC17
EFFECTIVE
PAGE
NUMBER
DATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
1 of 3
BACKGROUND
Under the Federal Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, passed as part of omnibus drug legislation
enacted November 18, 1988, contractors and grantees of Federal funds must certify that they will
provide drug-free workplaces. At the present time, the City of Costa Mesa, as a sub -grantee of
Federal funds under a variety of programs, is required to abide by this Act. The City Council has
expressed its support of the national effort to eradicate drug abuse through the creation of a
Substance Abuse Committee, institution of a City-wide D.A.R.E. program in all local schools
and other activities in support of a drug-free community. This policy is intended to extend that
effort to contractors and grantees of the City of Costa Mesa in the elimination of dangerous drugs
in the workplace.
PURPOSE
It is the purpose of this Policy to:
1. Clearly state the City of Costa Mesa's commitment to a drug-free society.
2. Set forth guidelines to ensure that public, private, and nonprofit organizations receiving
funds from the City of Costa Mesa share the commitment to a drug-free workplace.
POLICY
The CEO, under direction by the City Council, shall take the necessary steps to see that the
following provisions are included in all contracts and agreements entered into by the City of
Costa Mesa involving the disbursement of funds.
1. Contractor or Sub -grantee hereby certifies that it will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in
Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's workplace, specifically the job site or location
included in this contract, and specifying the actions that will be taken against the
employees for violation of such prohibition;
--- 3 �_- -::-s PSA 11
SUBJECT
POLICY
EFFECTIVE
PAGE
NUMBER
DATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
2 of 3
b. Establishing a Drug -Free Awareness Program to inform employees about:
1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
2. Contractor's and/or sub -grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs;
and
4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations
occurring in the workplace;
c. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the
contract be given a copy of the statement required by subparagraph A;
d. Notifying the employee in the statement required by subparagraph 1 A that, as a
condition of employment under the contract, the employee will:
1. Abide by the terms of the statement; and
2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation
occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction;
e. Notifying the City of Costa Mesa within ten (10) days after receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 from an employee or otherwise receiving the actual notice of
such conviction;
f. Taking one of the following actions within thirty (30) days of receiving notice under
subparagraph 1 D 2 with respect to an employee who is so convicted:
1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and
including termination; or
2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local
health agency, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
a�-q PSA 11
SUBJECT
POLICY
EF'F'ECTIVE
PAGE
NUMBER
DATE
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
100-5
8-8-89
3 of 3
g. Making a good faith effort to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation
of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 F, inclusive.
2. Contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be deemed to be in violation of this Policy if the City
of Costa Mesa determines that:
a. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has made a false certification under paragraph 1
above;
b. Contractor and/or sub -grantee has violated the certification by failing to carry out
the requirements of subparagraphs 1 A through 1 G above;
c. Such number of employees of Contractor and/or sub -grantee have been convicted
of violations of criminal drug statutes for violations occurring in the workplace as
to indicate that the contractor and/or sub -grantee has failed to make a good faith
effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
3. Should any contractor and/or sub -grantee be deemed to be in violation of this Policy
pursuant to the provisions of 2 A, B, and C, a suspension, termination or debarment
proceeding subject to applicable Federal, State, and local laws shall be conducted. Upon
issuance of any final decision under this section requiring debarment of a contractor
and/or sub -grantee, the contractor and/or sub -grantee shall be ineligible for award of any
contract, agreement or grant from the City of Costa Mesa for a period specified in the
decision, not to exceed five (5) years. Upon issuance of any final decision
recommending against debarment of the contractor and/or sub -grantee, the contractor
and/or sub -grantee shall be eligible for compensation as provided by law.
/CSG I'SA
PSA 13
EXHIBIT A
- ail --
PROPOSAL
for
BUILDING PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONSERVICES
Submitted by
Scott Fawkes & Associates,, Inc.
May 3, 2012
SN" 11-441A
Building Safety for Government
May 3, 2012
Mr. Keith Clarke, C.B.O.
Building Official
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive, 2' Floor
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Subject: Proposal to Provide Building Flaw Check &inspection Services
Dear Mr. Clarke:
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. (SFA) would like to be considered to provide building plan
check and inspection services, as needed, to the City of Costa Mesa. We understand the specific
needs of the City and will be able to offer services which are tailored to those needs.
Some of the key features of SFA are as follows:
a
® Exclusively serving governmental agencies and provides no building design to
avoid conflict of intexest.
® Sixteen (16) years experience serving Costa Mesa's Building Division.
0 Excellent staff with municipal experience and public relations skills.
® Strong internal organizational systems and policies to facilitate timely and
professional services.
Excellent references from clients and applicants.
® Questionnaires sent to every applicant to determine satisfaction level enabling
refinement of services.
Timely turnaround.
Principal of SFA participation in hands-on plan review.
Internal forms, policies and procedures to achieve tailored services to meet the
exact needs of the City.
Willingness to meet with applicant and/or City staff at City facilities whenever
requested by the City for specific projects.
r�3(1,�
9 Corporate Park, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92606-5173 - 949/475-2901 - FAX 949/475-2560 - sfairvine@aol.com
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. Keith Clarke, CBO
City of Costa Mesa
May 3, 2012
Page Two
Credentials include:
Structural 'Engineers
® Civil, Engineers
s Architects
® Certified Plans Examiners
® Certified Building Inspectors
® Certified Building Officials
LEEK Accredited Professionals
® CASp
SFA currently provides similar services for many of your neighboring jurisdictions such as
Anaheim, Tustin, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Santa Ana and Cypress. We are involved and
familiar with the regional needs and issues applicable to the City of Costa Mesa.
I hope the enclosed information is found to be concise and informative. Should additional
information be desired in a given area, I would be pleased to provide it. I will look forward to
hearing from you to further discuss how Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. can serve the City of
Costa Mesa.
Sincerely,
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc.
Scott R. Fazekas, AIA, NCARB, CBO, LEER AP, CASp
President
3" — Scott Faamel aas & Ass -g teems, Inc.
fable of Contents
SECTION I - INTRODUCTION
KEY AGENC ;' NEEDS
ABOUT THE COMPANY
PHILOSOPHY
SECTION 2 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
PROJECT MANAGER -LIAISON
TYPE OF PLAN REVIEW AGREEMENT
BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
BUILDING INSPECTION
SECTION 3 - METHODOLOGYIAPPROACH
INTERNAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF SFA
SECTION 4 - SEA'S QUALIFICATIONS/EXPERIENCE
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
SFA'S, EXPERIENCE
RESUMES
SECTION 5 - REFERENCES
SECTION b - FEES
APPENDIX - INSURANCE
scoff Fameicus & Asnowlates,110 ..
Section w 1- Introduction
KEY AGENCY NEEDS
The entire Proposal addresses all the components that as a whole make SFA a high quality
solution to the City's needs. Some of the following are highlights which we feel are specifically
germane to the RFP.
a Fast turnaround times:
City Referred Plan Check 10 days initial
5 days recheck
Accelerated Plan Check 5 days initial
3 days recheck
Competitive fees
® Experience of individual plan check staff in this field
® Municipal experience in building departments familiarity with all internal &
external agency and division needs
Excellent references - additional beyond those in Proposal are available
Prior consulting experience with City and familiarity with local needs
® Nearby office location
SFA incorporates several internal procedures which will 1) insure better communication with our
client agencies and the applicants, 2) achieve plan reviews which are more consistent with the
specific policies and needs of our clients and 3) enhance internal organization and processing.
ABOUT THE COMPANY
Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. (SFA) is a California Corporation founded by Scott Fazekas in
June 1996.
SFA was established to provide services exclusively to municipal building departments. This not
only ensures that no real or perceived conflicts of interest could occur but also provides a
specialized operation that is tailored to the exact needs of municipal building departments.
SFA has developed a strong plan check team with years of experience and excellent credentials
who all work in one well -coordinated geographic office location. Emphasis is on consistent, well
informed application of code expertise in the review of projects. Staff tenure offers our clients
the stability of SFA's resources and historical knowledge of policies, practices and specific
projects.
SFA has been involved in key organizations such as I.C.C., Calbo, AIA and SEAOC over the
years by serving on committees and boards, as well as lecturing at and attending seminars and
conferences. Staying abreast of the code industry is key to SFA's philosophy of serving as a
highly -trained extension of our client's staff.
301 -
go V.-tyd-4ran Inc.
Section _ I - Introduction
The primary service provided to our clients is plan review. SFA's plan check capabilities are
enhanced by our understanding of the roles in a municipal building department which interface
with, and rely upon, a competent plan review. The President of SFA has served as interim or
contract building official in sixteen jurisdictions over his career and several of SFA's plan check
team have supervised and/or trained municipal building department staff during their tenure in
their respective cities.
SFA's office location is:
9 Corporate Park
Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92606
(949) 475-2901, FAX (949) 475-2560
i l _'1' ...@; ;�
Through our experience in providing contract services to goverranental agencies, SFA has
identified concepts and ideas that are essential for a consultant to possess in order to effectively
v.s fulfill the building department requirements of a city or county. They are as follows:
The experience and staff to respond to each agency's needs in a timely, efficient
and cost effective manner.
® Administrative and management ability of high caliber to identify problem areas
and provide for their correction in a timely and sure manner.
The ability to recognize and develop the attributes and strengths of staff members
and to utilize them to their full potential.
® A reputation for quality performance and integrity to successfully administer all
aspects of the codes.
o Expectations and performance accountability that are established and adhered to.
Professional representation on behalf of the client agency in order to maintain
good public relations.
® Communication with the assigned client agency liaison through meetings,
memorandums and status reports.
Coordination with other agencies which require Building Department
involvement.
3")2--
W aym-gran 41, male.
Section - I - introduction
Attendance of key meetings to keep infor►ned on the most recent code
administration techniques and procedures.
Attendance at any required meetings, connected with the plan review services.
- SPA does not perform any work for the private sector so no conflict of interest can result
during our tenure, allowing SFA staff to maintain objectivity in the enforcement of
regulations.
The scope of regulations that affect the design and construction of buildings has become
increasingly diverse and complex with new legislation, multiple disabled access regulations and
new generation energy regulations in addition to the usual updating of the building codes and
municipal ordinances. It is essential to the proper operation of a building department that its staff
as well as its consultants be aware of, and well trained in, the interpretation and application of
codes and their enforcement. SPA stresses that continually updated training is essential in
maintaining quality code enforcement services.
The following sections outline in more detail the range of services, approach, unique
qualifications, special concerns, personnel and experience that SPA offers the City of Costa Mesa
to meet your day-to-day building safety plan check needs.
Section 2 - Scope of Service.
The following is the itemized Scope of Services which SFA's staff is prepared to provide for the
City of Costa Mesa. All are expected to be performed as part of this Proposal. The Scope of
Services and the manner in which they are performed will be in accordance with the specific
requirements of the City's program.
PROJECT MANAGER -LIAISON
SFA recognizes the need to assure an adequate level of commitment by key personnel. SFA will
commit the President, Scott Fazekas, as the Project Manager who will see to the proper function
of the building plan review process and will also be personally involved in performing services.
He will serve as an extension of the City staff, fully capable of providing the necessary services
as determined by the City. SFA's availability to the City staff is an essential ingredient. Prompt
information on job status will be provided whenever requested.
The Project Manager will be responsible for the quality of all services provided by SFA's staff.
He will be capable of dealing with a diversity of personalities and the many different levels of
administrative, technical, professional and construction personnel categories that are involved in
building code enforcement.
SFA will also maintain continual documentation and updated information on the status of all
plans being processed. Any inquiries regarding the status of plans which have been forwarded to
SFA for review can be directed to us to avoid unnecessary research and phone time by City staff.
General Assistance
. SFA welcomes the opportunity to aid our clients with general information and departmental
assistance in addition to providing plan review services. We like to be considered a valuable and
accessible resource that will make operating your department easier. SFA's exposure to
e�
numerous agency operations, our experienced employees each with specialized expertise, and our
involvement in committees and attendance at numerous seminars will give the City of Costa
kJ Mesa the benefits associated with an increased level of staffing.
TITES OF PLAN REVIEW AGREEMENTS
LONG TERM (CONVENTIONAL) AND ACCELERATED (3`a PARTY)
SFA will offer plan review services through two methods: the conventional process referred to by
Costa Mesa as Long Term and through the third party arrangement known as Accelerated.
The Long Term plan reviews are those selected to be assigned to a consultant by the City staff.
Upon completion of the first initial review, SFA would invoice the City. SFA has provided
services through this method in the past year.
39-1
Section 2 r Scone of Services
The Accelerated Agreement is where the City authorizes the applicant to go directly to a
consultant to have the review performed. Once authorized, the applicant delivers plans and
remits a fee directly to the consultant, reducing administrative processing for the City. SFA has
also worked under this arrangement in the past year. Our proximity to the City has been
convenient for the applicants.
BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
Building Codes
SFA proposes to perform both structural and non-structural plan review of residential, industrial
and commercial buildings for compliance to all local ordinances and state code amendments that
pertain to local enforcement of building and safety, and for compliance to the adopted California
Building, Residential, CAL Green, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Code. The scope of
review may be subject to the direction of the City's liaison.
Since revisions are continually being made to the codes to allow for new methods and materials
in construction, it is essential that every jurisdiction maintain a well-trained staff in order to
provide quality plan review services. As an extension of City staff, SFA provides such quality
enforcement of the Codes and Ordinances.
State Handicap Regulations (D.S.A.)
SFA provides comprehensive administration of the handicap regulations which the Division of
the State Architect mandates local jurisdictions to enforce through the Building Safety
Department. This applies to both new and existing buildings. SFA staff is qualified to interpret
and enforce state law and also has the expertise to review requests for "unreasonable hardship"
waivers and recommend action should the City so desire.
State Handicap Regulations (H.C.D.)
SFA also administers the new handicap regulations which local jurisdictions are mandated to
enforce by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. These standards
pursue a different approach than the D.S.A. regulations in that they apply to multi -family
residential. We have extensive experience in reviewing plans to which these standards apply.
State Energy Regulations
SFA provides energy calculation review in accordance with the energy law requirements. SFA
will incorporate the proper documents in the plans for use by both the inspector and the builder,
facilitating improved field relations and quality of the end product. Here also, emphasis is placed
on attendance at energy seminars to obtain updated information and training in the energy
regulations and the use of related forms.
se®tlt Faselmn. lose.
Section 2 e ,Scope of Services
State Noise Ordinance
SFA's services include checking to see that both interior (and exterior, when so directed by the
City) noise intrusion are properly addressed by the designer and that the necessary assemblies
provide the required degree of sound attenuation in accordance with State law. If exterior sound
attenuation is a concern, SFA will review for compliance when so directed. If noise contour
maps are provided, we will check as to whether or not the buildings are subject to such
regulations.
Federal Flood Plain Regulations
Many jurisdictions have areas that, due to either their proximity to water or their elevation, are
subject to federal flood plain regulations. If so desired, applicability to each project will be
checked and addressed during the plan review stage. This alerts the developer at the earliest
possible time in order to allow for advance planning. This is particularly important at the grading
plan review stage.
Soils Engineering
SFA responds to the_critical nature of proper building pad and site design as they apply to
proposed structures by anticipating potential problems and addressing them at the plan review
stage. Staff will review soils reports and verify implementation of their design recommendations
and parameters into the structural design of the building as part of the building plan review.
When subject to Flood blain or Liquefaction Zone criteria, SFA will review for such compliance
when so directed by the City.
INSPECTION SERVICES
SFA proposes to suggest a unique method of staffing inspection services. It is more likely
aligned with the current economic times and the needs of the City, offering cost savings over
traditional consulting services.
SFA proposes to utilize a sub -consultant staffing agency which will payroll the employees.
There are two options which are available to the City.
Option i
SFA would work with the City to select employees that would meet the qualifications, full or
part-time hours and salary range based on the City's needs. We would direct the sub -consultant
Apple One Staffing Services to employ them for the City. SFA would invoice the City under
SFA's Agreement.
- 39�
Section 2 - Scope of Services
Option 2
Similar to Option 1, however, SFA would not use the staffing company as a sub -consultant.
Instead the Staffing Service organization would employ the individual selected to the City
- directly. This saves the City a sub -consultant mark-up by SFA.
The rates based on multipliers times payroll rate for both of these options are shown in the Fee
Proposal Section.
.Xcuff Faselaas 40. Ass4wint es, Misc.
INTERNAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF SFA
Office Hours
SFA's office hours are between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday during which
time SFA staff will be available for communication directly with the applicants.
Agency Information Sheet
This form is designed as a starting point for the plan checker to review prior to commencing each
project. It serves as a summary of items which may be unique or exclusive to each client such as
ordinance amendments, special policies or interpretations, plan routing preferences, contact
person(s) in agency, etc... This form is often backed up with other documents such as general
notes, ordinances, agency checklists or guidelines. This form can easily be updated at any time
by simply calling SFA.
Plan Transmittal
SFA will open a U.P.S. account which is paid for and made available for use by City staff for
plan delivery purposes. Pre -labeled snail bags are also provided so dispatching plans to SFA is
simple and convenient. Usually, SFA personally does pick-ups and deliveries to City 140.
When plans are completed they are stamped on every page, signed and forwarded by U.P.S. or
courier with a transmittal form directly to the City. The plan transmittal procedure used by SFA
eliminates the possibility of the plans being tampered with when being forwarded for permit
issuance.
Computer Plan Check Log
Internal tracking is accomplished by a sophisticated computer software that allows for daily
tracking of status of each and every plan check and also gives SFA the workload of each
engineer. Incoming and outgoing plans are logged into the computer daily which allows us to
know the status of a project immediately. This program allows SFA to quickly answer applicants
who call wanting to know plan check status of projects. Many other reports are also available
and utilized by many of our clients. Reports that show the client all active plans for their City
and the status of each can be printed on a weekly basis to show the client the activity of their
projects. Weekly status reports are also printed for internal tracking of performance on
turnaround times.
Additionally, SFA has a weekly status audit form which monitors due dates to be used as a tool
in meeting our turnaround goals. This is available to the city when requested.
NCOft l'aZ ln,% & ssea.-itene, apic.
Section 3 e MethodologylApproach
Correction Lists
The plan review staff have a variety of correction lists, supplemental lists and guidelines for use
as deemed appropriate on each individual project. Should the City require use of their standard
correction lists, SFA can easily accommodate this by maintaining copies in our Agency
Correction List File and referencing their use on our Agency Information Sheet which all plan
check staff reference at the beginning of each review. Two copies of the correction lists are
developed and attached to the plans along with a transmittal form.
F
<f When plans are completed, they are stamped on every page, signed and forwarded by U-P.S. or
courier with a transmittal form directly to the City or to the applicant, depending on the
applicable process. The plan transmittal procedure used by SFA eliminates the possibility of the
y plans being tampered with when being forwarded for permit issuance.
A list of all required plan corrections will be typed on SFA's Correction Lists and will be
submitted to the City.
Transmittal Form
SFA's Transmittal Form is tailored for use specifically with building plan checks. Besides
serving to document enclosures, it serves as a good communication tool to alert the permit
technician of a number of things which are critical at the permit issuance stage. Some examples
are 1) when special inspection is required, 2) when another agency approval is necessary, 3)
if the building official was involved in an interpretation and should be given a chance to review
the project, and 4) if additional review fees are due as well as a number of other topics.
Questionnaire
SFA sends a Questionnaire to each applicant once the review process is complete. This helps by
M soliciting feedback on the services provided by SFA customers of the building departments
which are entrusted to SFA. The comments received are forwarded to the client agency on a
quarterly basis. This process makes the plan checker aware that the company values a
professional attitude, sends a message to applicants that we care about providing professional
services, and lastly, it informs the client agency about the service level SFA is providing.
�., SFA's goal is to provide consistent, timely and professional services geared to the needs of each
client agency. We want to be considered an extension of your agency's staff, not providing
generic services but services which are an integral component with our client's departmental
operations.
- 311q
Xcoo nzelfa% & Assomintes, Inc.
Timely Performance
SFA will strive to maintain efficient turnaround times on all reviews since this is largely a
measurement of our performance. It is one of the categories on our questionnaire which is given
to our applicants. The turnaround time indicated is the date by which the plans are to be received
back at the City.
The maximum turnaround time for standard plan review service referred by the City will be ten
(10) working days. Rechecks for City referred plan check will be five (5) working days.
Turnaround time for accelerated plan reviews will be five (5) working days for the initial review
and three (3) working days for rechecks. Extremely large or complex structures would be as
agreed upon with the City's Building Official in advance.
Every effort will be made to accommodate any fast track plan check schedules that might come
about in the City.
SFA will accommodate preliminary reviews to facilitate more on -track projects at the time of the
formal submittal for plan check when requested by the City staff This will aid in timely
turnaround times as well as good public relations.
Public Relations/City Representation
All representation with the public and other agencies relating to building plan review will be
made in a professional and courteous manner. Upon completion of initial plan review, the
applicants are contacted by telephone and are given the option of either having their plans mailed
to them via U.P.S. or being able to pick them up in person. When they resubmit corrected plans
they are also given the option of transmittal by U.P.S. or coming in and going over any
corrections in person. Re -checks in our office are handled without interruption in one of several
private offices should the applicant desire to go over the plans in person. SFA uses United Parcel
Services for transmittal of plans to assure verifiable and prompt delivery.
Interaction with Applicants
To summarize, SFA's approach involves courtesy, responsiveness, communication, technical
thoroughness, convenience and follow-up on service level. Some specific illustrations are as
follows:
When additional information is needed from applicants to complete the review,
applicants are contacted by phone to discuss best approach to facilitate a
complete/timely review.
When plans are completed, applicant is notified and given choice of picking up
plans at SFA's office, City Facilities or having them sent via U.P.S.
Section 3 - MethodologylApproach
Meetings at City Facilities or in the field may be attended by plan, checker
when requested by the City.
Communication regarding corrections is offered via FAX.
An Applicant Questionnaire will be sent after completion of plan check and any
comments received are forwarded quarterly to the City.
A customized Transmittal Form tailored exclusively for plan check is used to
enhance communication with the applicant and the City's permit technician.
Prompt turnaround times as stated earlier in Proposal. Special circumstances and
requests will be given every effort to accommodate special/shorter time frame
scheduling needs.
® SFA maintains copies of all records to insure that misplaced documents by
applicants will not cause project delays.
Preliminary reviews are available if applicant so requests through the City's
Representative.
Code interpretations relating to items challenged by the applicants will be handled
by senior staff to achieve an agreeable solution or SFA will contact the City to
determine what the wilding Official's ruling and direction would be.
. )ft IFa ym-I n & liec.
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
Principal
Scott R. Fazekas, President, SFA
Registered Architect, CA, C-019013, NCARB, Colorado, Nevada
28 years managing municipal building safety consulting services
40 years working in building safety divisions
Certified Building Official, I.C.C.
Certified Pians Examiner, I.C.C./Calbo
Certified Building Inspector, I.C.C./Calbo
LEED AP
Certified Access Specialist, CASp
Scott Fazekas, as Principal, will be responsible for the administration of services and seeing that
services are tailored to the specific needs of the Agency. He has managed consulting plan check
and building safety services for over 22 years. He will also perform plan reviews and assign
which employees will work on each given project. Mr. Fazekas is Past President of the Orange
Empire Chapter of I.C.C. and has served on the Code Development and Education Committees.
He has also served in the capacity of Building Official and stays abreast of changing regulatory
trends.
Associates
Canesh Rao, Plan Check Engineer
Registered Structural Engineer, CA, S-4471
10 Years .Design Experience
16 Years Plan Review Experience
Mr. Rao has diverse design experience of wood, concrete and steel in low, mid and high-rise
structures of varying occupancy groups. Now focused in plan review he brings a thorough
knowledge of current structural code provisions.
Vis Penera, Plata Check Engineer
Registered Structural Engineer, CA, S-2083
Certified Plans Examiner, I.C.B.O.
24 Years Municipal Safety Departments
15 Years Private Municipal Consulting
Vic Penera had been with the City of Los Angeles Building Safety for the majority of his career
with experience in both plan review and supervision.
�S2 -
gcgDtf 11 n"Ims vq, Assupclntet%7, 1310.
Section 4 - QualfficationslExperience
Brett Archibald, Plan Cheek Engineer~
Registered Civil Engineer, CA
Certified Plans Examiner,l.C.C.
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, SDSU
Build It Green Certification, CA
Certified Access Specialist, CASp
' Brett Archibald has ten years experience with SFA in residential and commercial plan review.
Peter Fang, Plan Check Engineer
Registered Professional Engineer, CA
Peter Tang has 12 years experience with SFA in residential and commercial plan review after
having spent sixteen years in structural design.
Russ Helmick, Electrical Plans Examiner
Russ Helmick provides specialized electrical plan review for all types of commercial and
industrial buildings. He worked as Chief Electrical Inspector with the City of Irvine and now
works for SFA reviewing electrical pians and consulting with the plan check staff on electrical
code. Russ also serves on NFPA code development and has taught electrical classes nationally
for both NFPA and local ICC chapters.
SFA'S EXPERIENCE
SFA currently provides building safety services for the following jurisdictions: Anaheim,
Arcadia, Beaumont, Cathedral City, Corona, Costa Mesa, Pico Rivera, Santa Rosa, Garden
Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Laguna Woods, Lake Elsinore, La Habra Heights, Indian
Wells, Norwalk, Ontario, Palm Desert, Pasadena, Perris, Rancho Palos Verdes, San Dimas, San
Fernando and Santa Ana.
SFA has performed thousands of plan reviews which have included every type of construction
and occupancy group in the building spectrum. We have also encountered many unique
administrative policies and processes in working with the building officials in our client
jurisdictions which may have arisen due to tight project scheduling, application of alternate
�y design methods or simply due to unique project characteristics. If additional information on plan
check references is desired, SFA will be glad to accommodate such a request.
— 3,5Y3, --
X"Co
,5Y3.—
X"Co 11,89j'Ams a A"mm ates, 111C.
cOtt FMA&MS A SSOC18fiS, ERIC,
SCOTT R. FAZEKAS
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, 1980
Supplementary Structural Course Work, California State University, Fullerton, 1984
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Licensed Architect, California, Colorado, NCARB, Nevada
CERTIFICATION
LEER Accredited Professional, LEED
Certified Access Specialist, DSA
Certified Building Official, I.C.C.
Certified Plans Examiner, I.C.C., C.B.C.
Certified Building Inspector, I.C.G., C.B.G.
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Fazekas is President of Scott Fazekas & Associates, Inc. (SFA) which provides building official,
building plan check and building inspection services to governmental agencies. Ile has interfaced
with architects, engineers, designers, contractors, plan checkers, inspectors, developers and building
owners to achieve code compliant building construction through the application of local, state, and
federal codes and regulations.
Mr. Fazekas has plan checked buildings which encompass the full spectrum of building types and
occupancy groups and has served as building official for fourteen jurisdictions through long term and
interim contract arrangements. He has also contributed to both the design and code enforcement
professions by regularly lecturing at code -related seminars and classes. He served six years on the
American Institute of Architects Building Performance and Regulations Committee where he
monitored the ANSI Al 17.1 Disabled Access Standards. He also served four years on I.C.B.O.'s
General Design/Structural Review Committee and on the Orange Empire Chapter of I.C.B.O.'s Code
Change Committee.
Mr. Fazekas has 40 years of progressive experience working in and for building departments. Prior
to starting SFA, he was employed by BSI Consultants, Inc. as a Senior Vice President and Division
Manager of the Building Safety Division. He was responsible for starting, developing and managing
the Building Safety Division for 11 years. During that time he served as building official in
California and Washington jurisdictions and oversaw plan review services for more than one
hundred client agencies. He also founded and served as President of Employment Systems Inc.,
which was a corporation dedicated to municipal staffing needs. Before his term with BSl, he spent
13 years working for the building divisions in the Cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa where
he worked his way through all levels in the departments from clerk to permit technician, inspector
and plan check engineer. _
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
A.I.A., I.C.B.O./ I.C.C., CALBO
a x-45 -
%Scett !'amici s & Am4mlates, kic.
VICTOR A. PENERA
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering
California State University, San Diego 1968
Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering
University of Southern California, 1970
Supplementary Structural Course Work
California State University, Los Angeles, 1973-76
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Registered Structural Engineer, California 1976
Registered Professional Engineer, California 1971
N = I'> 0
After completing 30 years of service with the City of Los Angeles, Mr. Penera retired in April , 2000
and immediately joined SFA as a member of its plan check engineering staff.
Having worked four years in the Department of Public Works and 26 years in Building and Safety
with the City of Los Angeles, Mr. Penera has substantial experience in both design and plan
checking of structural systems. In the 26 years he spent with LA Department of Building and Safety,
he plan checked a wide spectrum of structural systems, occupancies and uses; from simple, wood -
frame, single family room additions to complex, high-rise, steel office buildings.
Fuzing the last three years of his career with Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety, Mr.
Penera served as the Deputy Superintendent of Building in charge of the Engineering Bureau. As
Chief of the Engineering Bureau, Mr. Penera oversaw a staff of 175 engineers, technicians and
clerical staff responsible for the checking for compliance of state and local regulations related to
building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical and zoning issues.
Mr. Penera was active in the development of the first International Building Code (IBC). For one
year he served on the Steering Committee for the development of the first draft of the IBC and for
two years served as Chairman of the Structural Subcommittee to draft the structural engineering
chapters (Chapters 16-26) of the proposed IBC.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Structural Engineers Association of Southern California
American Society of Civil Engineers
International Conference of Building Officials
_ �% scaltlf F. -az 'llar, 151C.
EDUCATION
ION
Masters of Science in Civil Engineering
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Bangalore University, India
Registered Structural Engineer in California
Registered Professional Engineer in California
Certified Plans Examiner, I.C.C.
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Rao has been a building plan check engineer in SFA's Irvine office since 1998. He reviews
both commercial and residential plans for compliance with model codes and local ordinances. He
has a total of 23 years of progressively involved engineering experience.
Prior to his employment with SFA, Mr. Rao has spent eight years in the design field with experience
in California, Nevada and Hawaii designing wood, steel concrete and post -tensioned low, mid and
high-rise structures. Occupancies which he has performed design work for have included retail,
medical, office resort, bridge, industrial, schools, parking structure and hanger facilities.
Mr. Rao has experience in a variety of geographic regions. His design experience includes projects
in California, Nevada, Washington, Oregon, Hawaii and the Territory of Guam. His plan review
experience has been in California, Nevada and Colorado. Mr. Rao has reviewed plans for code
compliance, residential, tenant improvement, low to mid -rise, tilt -up warehouses, etc. Projects
included a three-dimensional finite element analysis of space frame for a mall in the Territory of
Guam, Disney Building in Burbank utilizing "Waurch" moment connections, seismic retrofit of
.Mattel Distribution Center, an aircraft hanger and Sony Technology Center in San Diego. Projects
also included design and detailing of antenna structure ranging from 30 feet monopole to 400 foot
latticed tower.
S t %Scatt Fa vieli s �11 AwmwAntex, laic.
PETER K. TANG
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, 1994
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Licensed Civil Engineer, California, C-59691
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Tang has been a plan check engineer in SFA's Irvine office for seven years. He reviews both
residential and commercial plans for compliance with model codes and ordinances. With a
background in forensic investigations on wood -framed structures, he is particularly well versed in
wood structures.
Over a sixteen year period, Mr. Tang has been exposed to a variety of engineering design
assignments with three different structural design firms. He was employed by Seismic, Inc. in
Pomona, Ficcadenti & Waggoner Structural Engineers in Irvine, and John A. Martin Structural
Engineers in Los Angeles prior to his employment with SFA.
Mr. Tang has been an excellent supervisor to junior plan checkers in the area of wood framing. His
expertise in rack design has also made him a valuable resource in the review of increasingly large
rack systems.
Mr. Tang was a project designer on Fresno State's Savemart Center, a steel and concrete sports area;
the Pacific Grand Resort, a steel conference center in Huntington Beach; the Westpart Tiernpo
Community in Irvine, a seismic retrofit ofhomes; and the Casa Gateway Condos in Pacific Palisades,
a seismic evaluation of 3 -story homes.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, California State San Diego, 2002
Structural Emphasis in Course Work
CERTIFICATIONS
Registered Civil Engineer, California
Certified Plans Examiner, I.C.C.
Certified Mechanical Inspector, I.C.C.
Build It Green Certification, CA
Certified Access Specialist, IDSA
_.
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Archibald is one of SFA's professional staff in our Irvine office. He has ten years of experience
with SFA reviewing both residential and commercial projects. He is assigned as liaison to the City
of La Habra heights where he has set times to coordinate with City staff.
Mr. Archibald has experience in plan checking a variety of projects including single and multi-
family housing, tenant improvements, seismic retrofits, tilt -up warehouses, etc. These projects
involved structural systems such as wood framing, light gauge steel, moment frames, cantilever
columns, concrete and masonry.
Mr. Archibald has also been instrumental in helping to establish tailored documentation for some
of SFA's newer clients or clients which are modifying procedures or policies. His computer skills
have assisted in the coordination of SFA processing with the needs of our clients.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council
American Society of Civil Engineers
35(4_ Xcott Fayw as & Asne 4mintes, Inc.
RUSSELL J. HELMICK, JR.
EDUCATION
Associates Degree in Math, Santa Ana College, CA, 1962
K-14 Teaching Credential, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
CERTIFICATION
Certified Building Official, I.C.C.
EXPERIENCE
T Mr. Helmick currently provides specialized consulting electrical plan reivew for all types of
commercial and industrial buildings for SFA. He is responsible for reviewing electrical plans for
various municipalities and consults with staff on electrical code.
Prior to joining SFA, Mr. Helmick was an Inspection Supervisor and Chief Electrical Inspector with
the City of Irvine. In his thirty years with the City, he supervised and trained a team of electrical
inspectors; performed difficult, special and complex inspections; and resolved complaints and
disputes. He was available to interpret code to laymen, contractors, architects and others as
necessary.
During his tenure with the City of Irvine, Mr. Helmick was an instructor at Saddleback Community
College for twenty years teaching electrical code and inspection; building code and law; Contractor's
License Law, Construction Inspection and Energy Management. He has taught electrical seminars
for]AEI and ICBG since 1991. He also serves on NFPA's Electrical Code Development Committee.
National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA)
International Association of Electrical Inspectors (IAEI)
International Council of Building Officials (ICC)
Underwriter's Laboratory (U/L)
American Public Works Association (APWA)
WIN
Section 5 - References
SFA currently provides building plan review services for the following agencies and SFA
encourages the City to contact these agencies regarding our work performance.
Agency: CITY OF ANAHEIM
Reference: Sheri Vanderdussen, Planning Director
(714) 765-5153
Service: Plan Review and Building Official
Agency: CITY OF ARCADIA
Reference: Don Stockham, Building Official
(626) 574-5420
Service: Plan Review
Agency: CITY OF BEA ON T'
Reference: Keith Hightower, Building Official
Agency: CI'T'Y OF CORONA
Reference: Rebecca Wisniewski, Plan Check Supervisor
(951) 279-3568
Services: Plan Review
Agency: CI'T'Y OF COS'T'A MESA
Reference: Khanh Nguyen, P.E., CBO, Community Development Director
(714) 754-5277
Keith Clarke, C.B.O., Building Oficial
Services: Plan Review
Agency: CITY OF DOWNEY
Reference: Mike Larnard, Building Official
(562) 904-7140
Service: Plan Review
-�3q I u IF ',a ir.-ax & Ar- seDeant s, Inc,
(951)769-8529
Service:
Plan Review
Agency:
CI'T'Y OF CATHEDRAL CITY
Reference:
Cil Estrada, CBO, Building Official
(760)601-6569
Service:
Plan Review
Agency: CI'T'Y OF CORONA
Reference: Rebecca Wisniewski, Plan Check Supervisor
(951) 279-3568
Services: Plan Review
Agency: CI'T'Y OF COS'T'A MESA
Reference: Khanh Nguyen, P.E., CBO, Community Development Director
(714) 754-5277
Keith Clarke, C.B.O., Building Oficial
Services: Plan Review
Agency: CITY OF DOWNEY
Reference: Mike Larnard, Building Official
(562) 904-7140
Service: Plan Review
-�3q I u IF ',a ir.-ax & Ar- seDeant s, Inc,
Section 5 - References
Agency: CITY DE GARDEN GROVE
Reference: Ding Victorio, P.E., Building Official
(714) 741-5427
Service: Plan Review
Agency:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Reference:
Mark Carnahan, C.B.O., Building Official
(714) 374-1792
Services:
Plan Review
Agency:
CITY OF IRVINE
Reference:
Joe Kirkpatrick, S. E., Building Official
(949) 724-6453
Services:
Plan Review
Agency:
CITY OF LA HABRA HEIGHTS
Reference:
Shauna Clark, City Manager
(562) 694-6302, #227
Services:
Plan Review, Building Official
Agency:
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Reference:
Bill Delvin, C.B.O., Building Official
(951) 674-3124, #286
Service:
Plan Review
Agency:
CITE' OF NORWALK
Tony Weimholt, CBO, Building Official
(562) 929-5739
Plan Review
Agency:
CITY OF ONTARIO
Reference:
Kevin Shear, CBO, Building Official
(909) 391-2546 ext. 4330
Service:
Plan Review
Agency:
CITY DE PALM DESERT
Reference:
Mr. Russell Grance, Building Official
Ms. Sam Szymanski, Sr. Plans Examiner
(760) 776-6420
Service:
Plan Review
otf 1"aay.�Araas & Assa ate-%, Inc.
Section 5 - References
Agency:
CITY OF PASADENA
Reference:
Sarkis Nazerian, CBO, Building Official
(626) 744-7571
Service:
Plan Review
Agency:
CTT' OF PERRIS
Reference:
Rene Avila, C.B.O., Building Official/Fire Marshall
(951) 433-1029 ext. 228
Service:
Plan Review
Agency:
CITY OF FICO RIVERA
Reference:
Eric Dennis, C.B.O., Building official
(562) 801-4331, cell (760) 670-0371
Service:
Plan Review
2
Agency:
CITY OF SAN DEWAS
Reference:
Eric Beilstein, Building Official
(909) 394-6264
Service:
Plan Review
Agency:
CITY OF SAN FERNANDO
Reference:
Francisco Villalva, Building Official
(818) 898-1231
Service:
Plan Review
Agency:
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Reference:
Gerald Caraig, P.E., C.B.O., Building Official
(714) 647-5896
Service:
Plan Review
Agency:
CITY OF SANTA ROSA
Reference:
Mike Whitacker, P.E., Chief Plan Check Engineer
(707) 543-3264
Service:
Plan Review
Section 6 - Proposed Fees
IiI►17 5[rt
V
The traditional approach in proposing building plan check fees is to apply a percentage to the
revenue collected by the agency for plan review fees. Using the City's schedule which is based
on Table 1-A of the 2001 C.B.O. and the 2002 Valuation Data Chart to establish the plan check
fee, SFA proposes to charge eighty percent (8%) of the established plan check fees for the scope
of work requested.
If SFA is reviewing duplicate or identical plans on a project, the proposed fee is ten percent
(10%) of the plan review fee collected after the initial model is checked at the prescribed rate.
When doing Accelerated flan Reviews, SFA will charge the applicants based on the same rate as
with the standard service with the City. This avoids the perception of impropriety. A minimum
fee for small projects is $300.00.
SFA will not charge for rechecks unless the plans are incomplete or revised for which the City
would collect additional fees from the applicant as well. The City would then have the fiends to
reimburse SFA. Additional services outside the main scope of review would be charged at a rate
of $100.00 per hour or as mutually agreed upon based on the salary rate of the employee.
HOURLY CONTRACT EMPLOYEE FEES FOR INSPECTION OR OTHER
POSITIONS
SFA proposes to charge for inspectors as follows:
Option I
Full-time employee with benefits billed through SFA's Agreement would be payroll times 1.81.
Full-time employee with benefits billed directly from the staffing service payroll times 1.45.
.For example, a $25.00/hour employee would be charged at $45.25 and $36.25 for Options 1 and
2, respectively.
These rates are based on the Staffing Service not being required to find and select the employee
and would be contingent upon the City finding and selecting the employee.
if the Staffing Service is requested to find the employees, rates of 1.94 and 1.55 would be
charged, respectively.
INSURANCE
Insurance is provided in the following amounts:
a. General Liability $1,000,000
b. Workers Compensation $1,000,000
C. Automobile $1,000,000
d. Professional Liability $1,000,000
A copy of the listed coverages will be provided to the City upon request of same.
I
f
3G 5--
Scott Fa zelmx- ®& Assn tea, low.