HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - CC-2 - Additional Documents - 6/21/2016ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS - CC -2
WARRANT INFORMATION
Payment
Date
Remittance to:
Remittance
Payment
Explanation of payment
Ref.
ID:
Amount
0197055
06/10/16
A & A Wiping Cloth Inc. —
0000018633
$1,406.16
What is this for? These towels are
White Turkish Wiping Cloths
purchased in bulk by the warehouse for
cleaning needs of Fleet, Fire, Police, an
various other departments. The unit price o
$32.55 is actually for a case of towels.
0197150
06/10/16
Pickleball Central —Picklenet
0000024348
$599.95
Where are we going to play pickle ball?
Portable Net, PBC255 Rally
Pickle ball will be played at the Downtown
Meister Bundle
Recreation Center, in the gymnasium.
CC -8 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS
HARBOR BLVD. & GISLER AVE.
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 16-02
Subject: FW: Consent Calendar Item 8
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS - CC -8
From: SETH URAMAN, RAJA
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 2:52 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL<CITYCOUNCI L@cLcosta -mesa.ca.us>; garvmonahan@att.net
Cc: HATCH, THOMAS <THOMAS.HATCH @costamesaca.gov>; ROSS, JIM <JIM.ROSS@costamesaca.gov>; GREEN, BRENDA
<brend a.green@costamesaca.gov>; SHELTON, KELLY <KELLY.SH ELTON @costamesaca.gov>
Subject: Consent Calendar Item 8
Mayor and City Council,
This e-mail is regarding Consent Calendar Item — 8, "Harbor Boulevard and Gisler Avenue Intersection Improvement
Project, City Project No. 16-02." A Councilmember expressed concerns regarding potential weaving movements that
might happen with three left -turn lanes being proposed at this location.
Staff has designed the subject improvements based on several prior resident complaints that we received and also our
observations. The current situation actually results in significant weaving movements as two left -turn lanes lead to three
destinations — 1-405 southbound onramp, 1-405 northbound onramp and northbound Harbor Boulevard. Existing signs and
pavement legends direct motorists heading to southbound 1-405 onramp to be in the #2 left -turn lane, with the #1 left -turn
lane accommodating 1-405 northbound and northbound Harbor Boulevard traffic. However, due to varying demands of
traffic and visibility of existing signage, this is not followed and results in dangerous movements within the intersection as
well as near the 1-405 ramps.
The subject project will provide one additional left -turn lane and adds an overhead guide sign on Gisler Avenue. This
provides the needed capacity to accommodate the traffic while providing appropriate guidance on lanes. With the
improvements, the #1 left -turn lane will be guided to northbound Harbor Boulevard, #2 left -turn lane to northbound 1-405
onramp and the #3 left -turn lane to southbound 1-405 onramp and eastbound Gisler. This will minimize confusion at this
intersection and result in better operations. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you.
Raja Sethuraman
Transportation Services Manager
City of Costa Mesa
714-754-5032
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CC -8
< Base course < Landscaping and irrigation
< Traffic signal, striping and signing < Lighting
< Drainage Improvements < Overhead directional sign
Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodoloffy with Un -equal Lane Distribution
ICU calculations were performed taking into account the observed intersection operation and un-
equal lane distribution. This methodology is explained in detail in the following discussion.
Peak hour intersection turning movement counts were collected (left, through and right turn
movements for each approach) at the intersection of Harbor Blvd/Gisler Ave (attached). This
count information was used to calculate the a.m. and p.m. peak hour ICU for the `existing
conditions' for the Harbor Blvd/Gisler Ave intersection (attached). A typical ICU calculation
assumes an equal distribution of traffic volume between approach lanes. This approach of
calculating ICU provided a resulting v/c ratio of 0.64 (LOS B) during the a.m. peak hour and
0.76 (LOS C) during the p.m. peak hour. The results of the ICU calculation for both peak hours
are not consistent with the actual field observations.
Field observations indicated that approach lanes destined for the I-405 freeway carried much
higher volumes of traffic than adjacent lanes, especially during the peak periods. In order to
identify the distribution of traffic between adjacent lanes on eastbound Gisler Avenue and
northbound Harbor Boulevard, additional data was collected. The additional data included
queuing counts and destination counts from eastbound Gisler Avenue and from northbound
Harbor Boulevard to the destinations of I-405 northbound on-ramp, I-405 southbound on-ramp
and northbound Harbor Boulevard. The destination counts provided the number of vehicles while
the queuing information was used to calculate the percent split between approach lanes and
identify any issues with the pocket lengths. There are two eastbound left turn lanes on Gisler
Avenue, the #2 lane being signed for southbound I-405 only, and the majority of the traffic
turning left is headed for one of the I-405 freeway on -ramps. Similarly, there are five through
approach lanes in the northbound direction on Harbor Boulevard and majority of the traffic
traveling north is also headed for the I-405 freeway, and directed to either lane #4 or lane #5 (a
very short through/right pocket) via overhead signage.
From the intersection turning count the total number of vehicles turning left from the eastbound
Gisler Avenue approach is 608 (a.m.) and 385 (p.m.) and from the northbound Harbor Boulevard
approach is 1,873 (a.m.) and 2,464 (p.m.). Typically, in a standard ICU the eastbound Gisler left
turn volumes would be divided by the two left turn lanes (assumed 304/193 vehicles per lane,
am/pm) and the northbound Harbor through volume would be divided by the five (actually 4.5
with .5 for the right turn) northbound approach lanes (3 75 a.m./493 p.m. per lane). Based on the
additional destination information collected the number of vehicles turning left from eastbound
Gisler Avenue and going to the I-405 northbound on-ramp plus to Harbor Blvd northerly is 237 /
231 (a.m./p.m.) and there are 372 / 170 (a.m./p.m.) vehicles going to the I-405 southbound on-
ramp (see count for eastbound Gisler Ave). Since the eastbound #2 left turn lane is signed for the
I-405 southbound only those vehicles going to the southbound on-ramp were designated to the
second left turn lane and the combined Harbor Blvd northerly and I-405 northbound were
assigned to the #1 left turn lane. As shown in attached count for northbound Harbor Blvd., the
Page 4 of 5
total number of northbound Harbor Boulevard vehicles (from lanes #4 and #5) headed to the I-
405 freeway is 1,018 (a.m.) and 793 (p.m.). Given the very short length of lane #5 the percent
split between the two lanes that carry the traffic bound for the freeway was observed (based on
queuing counts) to be 77% (a.m.) and 64% (p.m.) for lane # 4 and the remaining on lane #5.
Hence, the traffic volume on lane # 4 was 782 (a.m.) and 507 (p.m.).
The ICU for the intersection of Harbor Blvd/Gisler Ave was re -calculated using the modified
volumes (discussed above) and modified lanes for the eastbound left turn and northbound
through movements (attached). The remaining volumes and number of lanes were not modified.
The ICU was calculated using the highest of these measured individual lane volumes in one
approach lane rather than dividing the total counted approach volume by the total number of
approach lanes as is `typical.' Hence, for the number of lanes, eastbound left turn is shown as 1
lane (rather than 2) and northbound through is shown as 1 (rather than 4.5 with .5 right) in the
`modified' ICU. Since the intersection operation and the ICU calculation critical move is
governed by the highest v/c from each approach and the highest v/c from eastbound Gisler
Avenue and from northbound Harbor Boulevard were identified as being from the #2 eastbound
left turn lane in the morning, the #1 left turn lane in the evening and the #4 northbound through
lane in the a.m. and the p.m., these inputs to the ICU calculation will provide a more accurate
estimate of actual intersection operations than a `typical' ICU calculation. This approach of
calculating the ICU provided a resulting v/c ratio of 0.87 (LOS D) during the a.m. peak hour and
0.80 (LOS C) during the p.m. peak hour which more closely matches conditions as observed in
the field.
Page 5 of 5
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS - CC -8
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
NDS
National Data & Surveying Services
Harbor Blvd and Gisler Ave, Costa Mesa
Peak Hour Summary
Date: 09/03/2014 6111411,
Day: Wednesday Lanes 0 4 1
-p AM 182 1873 89 2639 AM
CD
NOON F0 F0 NOON
A-1
PM 411 2464 123 2505 PM
Gisler Ave 1 I* 4
AM NOON PM
277 Fol 604 a
2 608 385 MO
.552 1 = y
.5 = 106 M*
Lanes AM NOON PM
ca mPe,rod.
Start
End
AM
7:00 AM
9:00 AM
NOON
F AM
NOON
PM
4:30 PM
6:30 PM
Total Ins & Outs
Signalized
4
1
t
e
AM 1977
67
1886
F AM
NOON
0
NOON
PM 2607
156
1999
14 PM
5503
1
4.5
.5 Lanes
Project#: 14-1214-001
City: Costa Mesa
AM Peak Hour 730 AM
NOON Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour 445 PM
AM NOON PM Lanes
145 =0 121 1
28 F0 37 1
24 �0 37 1
=> 149 El
160
AM NOON PM
Total Volume Per Leg
2144
2639
AM
4783
AM
0
0
0
NOON
NOON
5503
2998
2505
PM
PM
AM NOON PM U AM NOON PM
277 0 604 197 0 195
1017 0 1118
346
0
355
740 0 514
.1149
0
160
AM NOON
PM
AM NOON PM
AM
1977
1961
AM
3938
0
NOON
0
0
NOON
4776
PM 2607 2169 PM
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
NDS
National Data & Surveying Services
Harbor Blvd and Gisler Ave,
Costa Mesa
End
Peak Hour Summary
Date: 09/03/2014 Southbound
9:00 AM
Approach
761 AM
Day: Wednesday Lanes 0
-� AM
4
F 0 ]
1
F0
255 AM
00
AM
375
418 PM
NOON �0
�0
�0
�0 NOON
A
PM=
�0
�0
375 PM
4J
1
Gisler Ave
AM NOON PM
2 1 Fol Fo]4=
2 0 0 0
.5
Lanes AM NOON PM
Count Periods
Start
End
AM
7:00 AM
9:00 AM
NOON
761 AM
NOON
PM
4:30 PM
6:30 PM
1! Signalized
4
1
t
e
AM F0
1
255
761 AM
NOON
761
NOON
PM
AM
375
418 PM
1
4.5
.5 Lanes
Project#: 14-1214-101
City: Costa Mesa
AM Peak Hour 715 AM
NOON Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour 430 PM
AM
* =
NOON
=
PM Lanes
= 1
1
r000
1
761
❑0
418
AM
NOON
PM
Total Ins & Outs Total Volume Per Leg
0 255 AM 255 AM
0 0 NOON 0 NOON
0 375 PM 375 PM
AM NOON PM AM NOON PM
74718
2 0 0 OM 0 0 0
2 0 0
0 0 0 y 761 0 418
AM NOON PM AM NOON PM
AM 0 1018 AM 1018
NOON 0 0 NOON 0
PM 0 793 PM 793
Date:
09/03/2014
Day:
Wednesday
7:00 AM
9:00 AM
A
ITM Peak Hour Summary
Prepared by:
NDS
National Data & Surveying Services
Harbor Blvd and Gisler Ave, Costa Mesa
Peak Hour Summary
Lanes 0 4 1
> AM
m
NOON I
2
AM NOON PM
122 ❑ 164 a
20�0�
.5
Lanes AM NOON PM
ca mPe,rod.
Start
End
AM
7:00 AM
9:00 AM
NOON
NOON0
PM 0
PM
4:30 PM
6:30 PM
Total Ins & Outs
0
0
0
AM NOON PM V
122
0 164
0
0 0
122
AM 0
NOON0
PM 0
PM
Signalized
4
1
Project#:
14-1214-201
AM F0
122
City:
Costa Mesa
115 AM
=
=
= NOON
PM
164
67
170 PM
NOON
1
4.5
.5 Lanes
AM Peak Hour
0 0 0
715 AM
NOON Peak Hour
372
67 PM
170
PM Peak Hour
372 1 0 1 170
500 PM
4
4
1
t
e
AM F0
122
115
372 AM
NOON
=
=
= NOON
PM
164
67
170 PM
AM
1
4.5
.5 Lanes
AM
NOON
PM Lanes
1
115
Flo 1
1
r000
NOON
1
NOON
67
67
PM
372
1:1
170
AM
NOON
PM
Total Volume Per Leg
115
AM
115
AM
0
0
NOON
NOON
67
67
PM
PM
AM NOON PM
0 0 0
122 0 164
372
0
170
372 1 0 1 170
AM NOON PM
AM NOON PM
609
AM
609
0
0
NOON
401
401 PM
Table 4
ADDITIONAL DOCS - PH -2
Adiusted Budget -in -Brief per Addendum
Fund Types
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS ADOPTED BUDGET
General Fund *
Special Revenue Funds
Capital Project Funds
Internal Service Funds
Total
* Excludes Transfers Out
Table 5
Fund Name
Adopted Adopted Increase/(Decrease) FY 16-17
FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Amount Percent % of total
$ 106, 586, 760 $ 109, 640, 655 $ 3,053,895 2.9% 75.8%
14,156,416 9,966,172 (4,190,244) -29.6% 6.9%
24, 757, 280 17, 379, 608 (7,377,672) -29.8% 12.0%
8,689,413 7,649,582 (1,039,831) -12.0% 5.3%
$ 154,189, 869 $ 144, 636, 017 $ (9,553,852) -6.2% 100.0%
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCES TO BE USED
Gas Tax Fund
Prop. 172 Fund
AQMD Fund
Park Dev. Fees Fund
Suppl. Law Enf. Svcs. Fund
Traffic Impact Fees Fund
Equipment Replacement Fund
Total
Projected Bal. Projected Bal. Amount
07/01/2016 06/30/2017 To Be Used Percent
$ 597,265
$ 49,707 $
547,558
91.7%
33,152
13,136
20,016
60.4%
89,773
(102,717)
192,490
214.4%
(1,486, 009)
(2,306,057)
820,048
-55.2%
16,996
-
16,996
100.0%
3,415,491
2,860,491
555,000
16.2%
7,747,911
5,565,494
2,182,417
28.2%
$ 10, 414, 579
$ 6,080,054 $
4,334,525
41.6%
PH -3 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
Subject: FW: Opposed to General Plan
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS - PH -3
From: kim Cartwright [mailto:kim.cart@sbcalobal.netj
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 7:11 AM
To: PLANNING COMMISSION <PLAN N I NGCOM MISSION @ci.costa-mesa.ca.us>
Subject: Opposed to General Plan
Dear Sirs,
I have been a resident of Eastside Costa Mesa for 22 years. I must tell you that this is by far the most ridiculous plan I
have ever seen. Also, many of the city would agree. Adding to pollution, traffic, noise and overall quality of our fine city. I
also feel it is very poor planned as far as long term impact. Overlay is highly beneficial to developers. Has the city council
lost their minds? Do not ever forget that the people of the city voted them in office not developers. Please, I urge you to
reject this overlay plan.
Warm regards,
Robert Cartwright
2101 Colina Vista Way
Costa Mesa, Ca. 92627
949-722-1899 home
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS - PH -3
Fairview Developmental Center Site
Land Use and Trip Generation Summary
Hand Written Page 6
Land Use
Low Denisty (06/01)
Passive Park (6/17)
Disabled High Density (6/01)
AMPeak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Units
In Out Total
In Out Total
ADT
Acres
Density
250
332
48 140 188
2 2 4
33 136 169
158 93 251
4 3 7
133 73 206
2,380
85
2,208
32
45
15
7.8
0.0
22.1
Institutional (Office)
1139.66 TSF
1 191 27 2181
35 173 2081
1,5401
121
1
6,213 104
Trip Generations
Original Study 3,776
6/01 Proposal 6,176
06/17 Proposal 6,760
Today's Proposal 6,213
r�
� `►� `'� � � 'fir y
yrr Jr`
T
a
! tot
z'
AL
i w
17
14 0
rt �!
I_ _
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2016/05/31 /7 -ways -to -save -the -world/
"The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail
to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change until we notice how failing
to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds. " —Daniel Go/eman, Emotional Intelligence
"Behind every problem, there's a question trying to ask itself. Behind every question, there's
an answer trying to reveal itself. Behind every answer, there's an action trying to take place.
And behind every action, there's a way of life trying to be born. " N Michael Beckwith, Agape
International Spiritual Center
We did not ask for this room or this music. We were invited in. Therefore, because
the dark surrounds us, let us turn our faces to the light. Let us endure hardship to be
grateful for plenty. We have been given pain to be astounded by joy. We have been
given life to deny death. We did not ask for this room or this music. But because we
are here, let us dance. - Stephen King.
To Members of the City Council, the Planning Commission and Staff of the City of Costa Mesa, Neighbors
and other interested parties:
By Linda Witt -King
June 21, 2016
In a recent letter to Will Barney, President of Humanus Group (humanus.ca), I wrote the following:
"I want to build a model for managing the homeless through a process starting with a hostel, then to
barracks -like temporary housing and case management, then on to more permanent sustainable housing in a
community that thrives on building and nurturing relationships - much like the Mobile Loaves and Fishes
project going on in Austin, Texas.
[ http://mlf.org/community-first/ ]
Costa Mesa and Orange County are ideal locations for building this model, and there are some intriguing
properties becoming available as the State of California is closing down all their Developmental Centers,
including Fairview Developmental Center right here in Costa Mesa.
[ http://www.dds.ca.,gov/fairviewNews/ ]
So I will turn my attention to actually writing all this down and re -submitting my Dragonfly Coalition
project with some numbers to start with.
I would also like to submit a grant request for Mercy House and for Unity of Tustin. Both organizations are
well-positioned to help uplift humanity in major ways with their consciousness and their service."
I propose to apply to the Humanus Foundation [Humanus.ca] for the funds needed to implement and sustain
the Dragonfly Coalition Project in the City of Costa Mesa.
I propose to lease the ten acre property that constitutes Lions Park, and offer a grant for the renovation of the
Fire Station. We will renovate the Community Center and the Library to serve both the clients of this
endeavor and the greater community of Costa Mesa at large. We will make needed improvements to the
existing structures and the grounds facilities to accommodate services to the homeless and provide a
supportive process for them to return to a suitable and sustainable living situation.
The lease and the grants to the City of Costa Mesa will help to eliminate the current debts of some
$25Million remaining from past fund raising measures and relieve the necessity of having to go into another
$30Million of more debt to fund needed development projects.
Once the Dragonfly Coalition/Community Wellspring has been implemented and is fully operational, the
benefits provided will bring added revenue and more jobs into the community by putting to good use those
properties - Lion's Park and the Fairview Developmental Center - that are currently lying fallow, inviting us
to raise them to their highest and best use through compassionate and benevolent action.
We will acquire the Fairview Developmental Center, whether purchase or lease from the State, and make
whatever renovations are necessary for it to be suitable and sustainable for these purposes.
We will lease the Grant Boys property to become the flagship hostel, renovate it, equip it and staff it for the
long term — approximately $450,000 a year for the lease, plus renovations, operations and staff.
We will create a system whereby those who have access to the benefits provided through this endeavor will
identify themselves and become participants in the operations of whatever aspects of the project fits with
their capacities to do so. Indeed, the registering and tracking of each resident in each of the sober living
facilities - whether government-sponsored or privately -owned - will become a requirement in the contracts
that govern these arrangements, holding the SLH operator accountable for the disposition of each of their
clients and subject to penalties when any of their clients disappear anonymously into the neighborhoods.
No more will people enroll in a sober living facility without identifying themselves to their host city and
without a defined exit strategy for them to pick up and carry on once their "recovery" experience is
concluded with that facility.
Between the various facilities and operations involved in the carrying out of these endeavors, there will be
plenty of jobs provided for those who want to work.
Needed remedies:
1. 1. Create a hostel where transients and travelers can land with basic accommodations provided while
waiting for more suitable and sustainable shelter to be arranged.
1.1. Acquire and transform into a facility for this purpose the 12,000 sq. ft. property on
Newport and Rochester vacated in January by the Grant Boys who went out of business.
1.2. This is the entry point into the Dragonfly Coalition/Community Wellspring program:
a) Intake to determine needs, capacities and aspirations
b) Stabilize — Nourishment, Self-care, Rest
• Be assigned a sleeping room with access to hygiene facilities, a place to stow their stuff
• Be assigned a Counselor who will serve as Advocate and Case Manager
• Be added to the Duty Roster as capacities permit.
• Provide each client with a package of basic self care items and a clean bedroll
• Provide nutrition designed for healing - a nourishing breakfast and supper: Simple,
organic juices, teas, tonics, grass fed bone broths, soups
• Morning and evening group exercise
2. Re -purpose Lions Park into an All Adult park;
a) Build out the public lavatories so that they are clean, well -lit 24 hours a day, and in full view
of security cameras
b) Install a community garden and host periodic community garden/farmer's market events in
the park.
• Specialize in growing potent inflammation reducing roots and sprouts and vegetables
such as Turmeric Root, Ginger Root, real Watercress — all essential nutrients to healing
and wellness, and all are expensive and in relative short supply.
• There is the opportunity to position ourselves ahead of the curve of a growing demand
while monetizing the endeavor, providing opportunities for productive, wage earning
work where it's needed the most, and providing a valuable service to the community in
incalculable ways.
c) Dedicate the sports field in Lions Park to become a secure location for dozens of Yurts to be
erected that will serve as the first level of suitable and sustainable shelter —
d) Add electrical and plumbing hook ups to hold a quantity of temporary huts for transitional
living while more permanent housing can be arranged.
e) Yurts have the added advantage of being easily collapsed and moved to other locations that
will be developed into communities ...or even sent along with the recipient as they move on to
somewhere else out of Costa Mesa, bringing their own interim shelter with them.
• Authenticyurts.com
• Yurts.com
• Campingyurts.com
• Yurtsofamerica.com
Develop the community center building/s in Lions Park into a resource center; by utilizing some
form of key card technology given in exchange for identification of the individuals needing these
basic accommodations, each of the services and resources become revenue producing:
a) Establishing and cultivating a relationship with these individuals is key to helping them
lift out of the state of homelessness — and to reducing the risks to our community that
are posed by the absence of these resources:
• Cafeteria
• Computer lab
• Overnight parking meters around the park
• Restroom facilities
• The Yurt Yard
• Fort Grant — the hostel
• Water Brewery
• Credit Union
• Advocacy in applying for benefits that are otherwise unavailable to them without
assistance from others
b) Nearly everyone who is currently homeless or bereft of any way to sustain themselves — has
some form of income, or at least would qualify for some kind of income but has no capacity
to claim that support without an advocate working through the system on their behalf.
4. Arrange for those served in this endeavor to have a membership in the 24 Hour Fitness, not limited to
the facility at Park and 19th, but - just as we seniors enjoy through the Silver Sneakers program paid
for by Medicare - to all of the 24 Hour Fitness facilities so that those served are not tied to just this
location but can move on out of the area as they begin to put their lives back together with the
assistance of our community's compassionate and benevolent practical assistance.
5. Identify properties where semi-permanent pod communities can be located as an interim housing
solution for as long as these economic conditions make them necessary.
5.1. Fairview Developmental Center is an excellent site for this purpose. We will acquire the
property in full as it is, enfold the current residents into the remedies brought forth through the
Dragonfly Coalition, update the existing structures for long term residences for the homeless and
needy, utilize some of the open spaces for a community of tiny houses, yurts, etc. where its
residents can achieve a measure of stability in a compassionate and nurturing environment.
6. Develop and implement a suitable and sustainable set of oversight controls for these sober living
facilities, including required accountability for the people who are currently arriving without
restriction into our community.
6.1. The Sober Living Homes and their transient residents are not the enemy. The City is
vulnerable to the chaos that is created by their activities because no preparations have been made
to accommodate them so as to capture the potential benefits they bring to Costa Mesa.
6.2. We can embrace the opportunities these transient occupants represent by inviting them to
enroll in Community Wellspring, the Dragonfly Coalition's concession umbrella, thereby
becoming a member of the credit union and partaking in the many benefits offered to whoever
needs them, no matter how they came to be in the state of need for these fundamental life -
supporting services and resources.
6.3. Community Wellspring will become a new and lucrative revenue source for the City of
Costa Mesa much like residential investors have enjoyed, only these revenue streams will be
much more consistent and in greater amounts, bringing new jobs and greater prosperity into our
community.
6.4. Implementing these compassionate and benevolent measures will relieve the
neighborhoods of the squatting and crime that is currently a severe problem because the homeless
have no place to go, no wherewithal to provide for themselves, and so they turn to crime.
My request is that we work together to draw up the grant requests to Humanus to establish this needed
endeavor, and to take steps to begin immediately to implement the spirit of the Dragonfly Coalition project,
at least, and the actual doing of the project where feasible.
I am so very grateful for the opportunity to serve our community in this way. Together we will create a
model that can be replicated in other communities so that the scourge of homelessness and all that implies
will soon become a distant memory.
Many blessings and radiant light upon us all,
Linda Witt -King
562-713-4486 cell or text
linda.wittkinc& cmail. coni
Archived calls
htlp:Hlandachinaglobal.com/conferences.12hp
Conference Number: 641-715-3580
Access Code: 484-959#
Wednesdays at 2:00 pm our time
April 27, 2016 call where the "Dragonfly Coalition Lady" asks for and receives
clarification on how to submit projects on behalf of existing nonprofit entities:
http://landachinaglobal.com/resources/68%2OLanda%2OHumanus%2OUpdate%204-27-
2016%20(43).mp3
May 25, 2016 conference call - Dragonfly Coalition Lady comments on the sound
technology being discussed and how it fits into the Dragonfly Coalition business model.
Project Totals
Fort Grant — 50 per day
Water Brewery
Yurt Yard
Community Gardens
Community Center/ Library
Lions Park — 500 per day
Fairview Developmental
Center — 2,000 per day
300 Sober Living Homes
with 6 Transient Residents
— 1,800 per day
Auto Dealership on Harbor
near Adams
Farmers Market/
Community Garden —
Events and Life Skills
Education
Credit Union
Open Space/ Community
Gardens and Agriculture
Fire Station Grant
Dragonfly Coalition
Community Wellspring -Costa Mesa
$80,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 115.00 $120,000,000 $80,000,000 200 $2,102,400
$1,000,000 $6,000,000
$6,000,000 $500,000 $10,000,000 $500,000 $5,000,000
$7,000,000 60
$22,000,000 50
$10,000,000 $7,000,000 $500,000 $500,000 $10,000,000 10.00 $28,000,000 $7,000,000 100
$100,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $109,000,000 60
$100,000,000 $7,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 10.00 $115,000,000 $7,000,000 60
$10,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,000,000 40
Note: These are thumbnail estimates, starting points to be added to and subtracted from, however we all decide.
Draft Budget Projections
$1,892,160
062016 v.2
062016
Lease
Renovations,
Revenue to
Total
City (annual)
Acquisition
First year
furnishings,
Operations,
$5,500,000
Costa Mesa
cost
lease amount
equipment
marketing
Staffing
$227,000,000
$104,900,000
$67,500,000
$29,000,000
$79,500,000
148.00
$500,000
$500,000
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
$5,000,000
0.64
$500,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$2,500,000
0.36
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$3,000,000
$26,000,000
$2,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,400,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$3,000,000
12.00
$80,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 115.00 $120,000,000 $80,000,000 200 $2,102,400
$1,000,000 $6,000,000
$6,000,000 $500,000 $10,000,000 $500,000 $5,000,000
$7,000,000 60
$22,000,000 50
$10,000,000 $7,000,000 $500,000 $500,000 $10,000,000 10.00 $28,000,000 $7,000,000 100
$100,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $109,000,000 60
$100,000,000 $7,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 10.00 $115,000,000 $7,000,000 60
$10,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,000,000 40
Note: These are thumbnail estimates, starting points to be added to and subtracted from, however we all decide.
Draft Budget Projections
$1,892,160
062016 v.2
062016
Lease
Number
Revenue to
Total
City (annual)
$507,900,000
$102,400,000
$10,000,000
to the City of
$5,500,000
Costa Mesa
$5,000,000
$4,683,726
$6,000,000
$62,651
$34,000,000
$26,400,000
$8,400,000
$80,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 115.00 $120,000,000 $80,000,000 200 $2,102,400
$1,000,000 $6,000,000
$6,000,000 $500,000 $10,000,000 $500,000 $5,000,000
$7,000,000 60
$22,000,000 50
$10,000,000 $7,000,000 $500,000 $500,000 $10,000,000 10.00 $28,000,000 $7,000,000 100
$100,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $109,000,000 60
$100,000,000 $7,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 10.00 $115,000,000 $7,000,000 60
$10,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,000,000 40
Note: These are thumbnail estimates, starting points to be added to and subtracted from, however we all decide.
Draft Budget Projections
$1,892,160
062016 v.2
062016
New
Number
Transient
of New
Occupancy
Jobs in
Tax revenue
Costa
to the City of
Mesa
Costa Mesa
795
$4,683,726
50
$62,651
25
30
30
60
30
$626,515
$80,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 115.00 $120,000,000 $80,000,000 200 $2,102,400
$1,000,000 $6,000,000
$6,000,000 $500,000 $10,000,000 $500,000 $5,000,000
$7,000,000 60
$22,000,000 50
$10,000,000 $7,000,000 $500,000 $500,000 $10,000,000 10.00 $28,000,000 $7,000,000 100
$100,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $109,000,000 60
$100,000,000 $7,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 10.00 $115,000,000 $7,000,000 60
$10,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $20,000,000 40
Note: These are thumbnail estimates, starting points to be added to and subtracted from, however we all decide.
Draft Budget Projections
$1,892,160
062016 v.2
062016
k
mom
Ip
. h
Dawn Comm nity_C nter
Recreations
m
moi`: �[ Z�• ` �' �. - �#
,+ •{ WWI
jr
= !
K9a!-
Girl
• Orang�
- ,V 3D
01
700@ MENliliii MM*
3z
rnagery02016 Googk Map date 02016 Gaogk- Terms Send Feedback 100 ft-
Examination of the Transient Occupancy Tax
as it applies to the Sober Living Homes in the City of Costa Mesa
[by Linda Witt -King, June 20, 2016]
In a report dated March 25, 2004 and submitted to the City Council in the meeting held on April 5, 2004,
Marc R. Puckett, then Director of Finance, entitled, Consideration of Potential New Revenue Sources.
Report Summary - At issue was the recommendation to increase the Transient Occupancy Tax from 6% to 8%,
and to increase the Business Improvement Assessment from 2% to 3%. The report described the Transient
Occupancy Tax as a general tax imposed on occupants for the privilege of occupying room(s) in a hotel, motel, or
inn. [ Sober Living Homes had not yet emerged onto the landscape in 2004 ] Use of the revenues are
unrestricted. However, some cities budget a portion of the revenues for tourism and business development
purposes.
Overview: Cities may impose the transient occupancy tax on persons staying 30 days or less in a room(s) in a
hotel, motel, inn, tourist home, non -membership campground or other lodging facility. Cities may also levy a tax
on the privilege of renting a mobile home located outside a mobile home park, unless such occupancy is for more
than 30 days or unless the tenant is an employee of the owner.
... Although Costa Mesa has one of the higher concentrations of available hotel rooms in the county, the transient
occupancy tax levied is the lowest in the County. [and today has among the highest concentration of Sober Living
Homes in any municipality, certainly in Orange County at least.]
Benefits of considering an increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax include placement of a portion of the tax
burden to provide city services on transient visitors to the community. Residents benefit from this spreading of the
costs of services over a larger tax base including those visiting the community, therefore lowering the cost of
services to residents. [End of April, 2004 Report summary]
Coming forward to present day, found in the Preliminary Operating & Capital Improvement
Budget for Fiscal Year 2016-2017, p. 45 is this quote:
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is imposed on persons staying 30 days or less in a hotel, inn,
motel, tourist home or other lodging facilities. In November 2010 the voters of Costa Mesa
approved a measure to increase the City's rate from 6 percent to 8 percent. The Business
Improvement Area (BIA), comprised of ten hotels within the City, imposes an additional 3 percent.
The amount collected from the additional 3 percent is remitted to the Costa Mesa Conference and
Visitor's Bureau to promote travel and tourism throughout the City. Thirty-three hotels/lodging
facilities are located within the City.
TOT is the City's fourth largest revenue source. For FY 16-17, estimated revenue from TOT is $8.5
million, which represents 7.2 percent of the total General Fund revenue. The projected amount
reflects an increase of $44,000, or 0.5 percent from current year projected revenue.
Here is one of the take-aways from last Tuesday night's (06/14/16) City Council meeting:
Net Impact to the General Fund by tvnes of land use:
Land Use Type Units per Acre
Low Density Residential 8
Medium Density Residential 12
High Density Residential 20
Overlay Zone 40
Retail
Office
Industrial
Hotels 100 rooms
Net Annual Impact per Acre
$ 4,000
$ 4,500
$ 500
<$ 3,000>
$ 70,000
Neutral
$ 4,500
$270,000
If these numbers are correct, pursuing the high and higher density residential development
being proposed in the draft General Plan would seem to be the exact opposite of good
stewardship, a total departure from what is needed in these times.
But it does explain why the call for more hotels ... a 100 rooms per acre brings in $270,000 per year.
Total revenue generated from 100 hotel rooms per acre $270,000
Less 42.52% derived from sales tax (p. 76 of Big Budget Book) $125,604 Sales Tax
How much TOT revenue per 100 rooms per year? $144,396 TOT and BI,
TOT attributed portion $105,015 8.00%
BIA attributed portion $39,381 3.00%
Daily TOT
Total TOT divided by 36,500 [persons per year per 100 rooms]= $2.88 per person
How many total SLH homes do we have in Costa Mesa
housing how many transients?
From the FAQs Regarding Group Homes
found here: http://www.costamesaca.gov/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=19935
...this question is asked and answered:
What is the difference between a Residential Care Facility and a Sober Living Home?
A Residential Care Facility is licensed by the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS).
Homes are required to be licensed by the DHCS when at least one of the following services is
provided: detoxification, group sessions, individual sessions, educational sessions, or alcoholism or
drug abuse recovery or treatment planning.
A Sober Living Home is a home used by people recovering from substance abuse, which serve as an
interim environment between rehab and their future lives. These homes are not allowed to provide the
same services of a Residential Care Facility.
Sober Living Homes are primarily meant to provide housing for people who have just come out of
rehab and need a place to live that is structured and supporting for those in recovery.
Are Residential Care Facilities and Group Homes permitted in sinale-familv residential neiahborhoods
(R1 zoned
Residential Care Facilities and Group Homes serving six or fewer persons are permitted in the R1
zone. Group homes require a Special Use Permit (CMCC 13-311). Special Use Permit applications
may be obtained from the City of Costa Mesa Community Improvement Division.
Regarding City's Ordinance 14-13 adopted in 2014 subsequent to 14-11 presumably, and found
here: htip://www.costamesaca.,gip/council/agenda/2014/2014-10-21/OB-1-Attach-l.pdf
WHEREAS, sober living homes do not function as a single-family unit nor
do they fit the City's zoning definition of a single-family for the following reasons:
(1) they house extremely transient populations (programs are generally about 90
days ...; (2) the residents generally have no established ties to each other ... (3) neighbors
generally do not know who or who does not reside...; (4) the residents have little to no say
about who lives or doesn't live in the home; (5) the residents do not generally share
expenses; (6) the residents are often responsible for their own food, laundry and phone;
(7) when residents disobey house rules they are often just kicked out of the house; (8) the
residents generally do not share the same acquaintances; and (9) residents often pay
significantly above -market rate rents; and
WHEREAS, the size and makeup of the households in sober living homes,
even those allowed as a matter of right under the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, is
dissimilar and larger than the norm, creating impacts on water, sewer, roads,
parking and other City services that are far greater than the average household, in
that the average number of persons per California household is 2.90 (2.74 in Costa
Mesa's R1 zones according to the City's General Plan), while a sober living facility
allowed as a matter of right would house six, which is in the top 5% of households
in Orange County according to the most recent U.S. federal census data; and
WHEREAS, all of six individuals residing in a sober living facility are
generally over the age of 18, while the average household has just 2.2 individuals
Note: By the very definition of the SLH and its purpose, the residents coming and going
through the facility are classified as Transients and should be subject to the City's 8%
Transient Occupancy Tax.
Note: According to ...pg 4 of Ordinance No. 14-13, individuals are only deemed "disabled"
under ADA as long as they are housed in an SLH and remain clean and sober. If they leave
or fall out of the program, they no longer qualify for ADA protections.
[WHEREAS, recovering alcoholics and drug addicts, who are not currently using alcohol
or drugs, are considered handicapped under both the FHAA and FEHA; ]
Note: There are all kinds of qualifications listed in Ord. 14-13 for the operator of an SLH,
even some for the investor/owner of the property being used for this purpose.
But nowhere in this ordinance can be found any requirement that the business operator
account for the individuals that are staying temporarily in their SLH facility, or that the
individuals themselves be required to identify themselves to their host city
...just like is the requirement for any other transient that is rolling through the town and
staying in a hotel or motel temporarily for whatever purpose.
City Stewards: If the Sober Living Homes were assessed the same Transient Occupancy
Taxes that are assessed on every other business that provides shelter for Transients as
defined in the various ordinances and recommendations, each bed would generate over a
thousand dollars a year of new TOT revenue.
$2.88 multiplied by 365 = $1,051
If there are 300 SLHs with 6 clients each, that is 1,800 x $2.88 every day = $5,184
That daily amount multiplied by 365 = $1,892,160 per year.
What if you could capture that?
City Stewards: It would only require modifying the scope of time applied to the definition
of transients that come under the TOT.
With just that one change in the City's ordinances, provisions are already in place* for
requiring identification of the persons who are staying at the SLH, and for recordkeeping
made of their arrival and departure for reporting these activities to the City.
*Provided for in the City's Ordinance 14-11 adopted on August 5, 2014 applying to motels
who are subject to the TOT
City Stewards: Question: What is $626,515?
Answer: The potential new TOT assessments on 500 persons per day sheltered in Lion's Park +
96 overnight parking spaces
2.88 multiplied by 500 per day = $1,440
2.88 multiplied by 96 parking spaces with hook-ups = $276
Total TOT per day in Lions Park = $1,716
Total TOT per day annually in Lions Park = $626,515
May we be guided by Wisdom, and grounded in Compassionate Action -
Radiant Light,
Linda Witt -King
562-713-4486 cell or text
linda.wittkingkgmail.com
Appendix of Authorities
Kryon, a multi -dimensional voice of Creator Source - February 27, 2016 - "New Systems" - the essence of it
We're going to discuss two things with you, and I'm going to show you an example of spiritual
evolution in thinking. We have told you now for decades that human beings are suddenly
presented with a beautiful opportunity and you're taking it.
The shift in energy is upon you; it is the one the ancients have said is coming and
the one that you're currently in.
Spirit is enamored by what is taking place here with that which are pieces of Itself. It is so difficult
for you to see the relationship; your souls are forever. Your souls are part of God, and yet when
you're in the human body, we're on the other side of the veil and it's almost a test isn't it? A test to
see if you can find us, wake up, find yourself, wake up. Discover God inside and wake up, and it's
a real test.
But the entire reason we're here is to tell you that you passed the marker of this test and you're
beginning to feel results. And it's in every single aspect of humanism. We've talked about the
emotions of joy, depression, suffering. We've talked about your health and healing. We've talked
about your relationships to others. Now we're going to talk about your society.
You can't expect to evolve in wisdom and keep the systems you have the same.
And we have discussed the systems in the past. The ones that are most dysfunctional we have told
you will fall first. All of this we see. We see a change in system. When the Big Pharma system falls
over, the only part that's going to fall over is the inappropriate part, the part that keeps people sick
for money will cease... because the humans on the planet will not tolerate it.
It's an old energy, so a new system will come in its place, one that works, one that is
inclusive of many things that are not included now - ones that would look at a
bigger picture, ones that ask human beings what they want, or what they need
[instead of asking where they came from and how can we get them to go back
there]. - It's smarter and wiser.
I want these things to make sense - now dear ones, this is not an indictment of any one person, any
system. I'm just going to show you evolution. I'm going to present something to
you that you will relate to in this day, this February day in 2016.
What you are seeing right now is a change of consciousness; it couldn't be clearer.
And what we have said before is that the consciousness that is being seen as changing is what
human beings want today that they did not necessarily see they wanted yesterday. Because in a
new light of gradual increasing wisdom, the Establishment is being seen as old,
dysfunctional, not working and needs changing.
I'll tell you what the system is going to be like potentially because it's in the works. It has to start
fresh. You cannot change this, there are too many people involved.
Appendix of Authorities
Let me tell you about a new Democracy. Human beings will always have different ideas. It is the
beauty, the richness of free choice. There will be those who believe an economy should work this
way or that way. Through years it has tested its viability; it's tried - what fails is not used, what
wins is. It's an old story. There will be those on one side of the fence or the other side of the fence.
It's an old story.
There will be the ones who are fighting for the roots of the earth and others are fighting for the
industry of the earth; there will always be dissension, always. But what is new, dear ones, is
the way you handle it.
A changing consciousness, one that's really changing on this planet, doesn't have
the facilities with an old energy system to handle refugees ... [or the homeless].
A few months ago, pictures of dead children on the beach galvanized the planet — and for a
moment the leaders got together and collectively wept with the foolishness of it all, and the
stupidity of it all. And for a moment they said, "Let them in".
This is not the first time you've had dead children on the beach [or homeless souls with no place
to sleep or use the bathroom ... or even just be]. In fact, I want to tell you that this is common and
has been common for decades. Pictures of children dead on the beach, the boat people trying to
escape the tyranny, the awfulness and the evil and the horror. This is not the first time, and yet it's
the first time that there was a compassionate reaction. Now that ought to tell you, humanity is
chanizinc for no other reason than a chance of consciousness, and these pictures made a difference.
Homeless men with no place to go or be, juxtaposed against the view of children in the playground in Lions Park.
For a moment you got to see it. And then the floodgate opened. And then the problems began, and
you know what they are; I don't have to list them. But the flood was there and there were
inappropriatenesses and there were the ones who would ride in with the others who had nothing to
do except make trouble. There were the thieves that would come with the children. There were
then the needy, ones who really needed to come, and nobody could vet them, nobody knew the
difference — and they came. [Similar circumstances exist here in Costa Mesa. The sober living
homes proliferating in our neighborhoods is only one aspect of a very complex set of issues.]
Appendix of Authorities
You know what's missing here? The Department of Compassion, a department of
government that I am telling you is coming.
What do you spend money on? What do weapons cost? [or sports fields]
What would it cost to have a Department of Compassion that was set up to take
any number of people who are escaping or say they are escaping [or homeless],
and to hold them in a way that was comfortable while you checked them out and
vetted them with a system that everybody cooperated with so you could weed out
the fakes.
It would take many people [jobs], it would take a lot of money - and it would be
worth it.
And there will be governments that say it's time to spend money on this kind of thing — so it
will make sense. And so, those we let in make sense. Those we turn back make sense.
A system of Compassion so we don't have to simply say it's broken, and shut the door [or deny
any responsibility for the misery exacerbated by the enforcement of rules completely devoid
of any compassion whatsoever... Have you yet removed the padlocks from the
lavatories in Lions Park?] Or so we don't have to say it's broken and we let them in anyway...
...A way, a system that is compassionate and wise - and you're gonna have to
spend money on it.
Who ever's listening — The United States of America, [Costa Mesa] I'll tell you —
produce one less submarine [or sports field] and fund this thing. And you can
— and you can — and you will.
This is the kind of thing that makes sense in a new world, in a new energy -
governments changing. The very basics of practicalness changing because
wisdom will start to prevail.
There is such hope that wisdom is going to change this planet. New systems are
afoot. New inventions are coming. Wisdom is coming. Peace in the Middle East is
coming. The things that are broken forever in your mind will not be broken
forever.
This is a new time, a new day. Dear light worker, you are on the cusp of it all. And
the few here and the ones listening are the ones [who will] take this kind of a
message inside and become part of the wisdom that is growing worldwide, and
you're seeing it on your televisions everyday.
I'm Kryon in love with Humanity. I've said it before, in a black and white world color is coming. Color
is coming.
And so it is. Kryon.com http://audio.krvon.com/en/Kelowna-main-16.mp3
Appendix of Authorities
Hamburg, Germany — Sunday, May 15, 2016 — "The Compassion Factor"
Kryon of Magnetic Service: This one we're going to call "The Compassion Factor".
The measurement of enlightenment of any civilization is the
Compassion Factor.
Is there compassion in what they do and what they plan?
Are there actual structures for compassion?
This is what makes the difference between a high and low conscious humanity.
We've told you in a past channel what would be a good idea, and something that is going to
occur, and it may not be called this, but we address the governments of the planet
wherever we will channel and we will say:
An International Department of Compassion should be built and
funded for this planet to be compassionate to the families [and individuals] who are
running from the dark side.
The issue is a big one, and the reason it's an issue at all is because there's no
Department of Compassion. There's no system to handle this
compassionate event.
What if there was?
We have indicated that there are energies that [have not been experienced before on this
planet]. These energies are everywhere. They are physical, they don't have a name yet.
Let me tell you what they are: They are catalysts when compassion is used.
If business could come together in a compassionate way, where the goals were different
than simply the products and the profits - there has to be something else. There has to be
compassionate action within the business structure; people have to be helped.
It is brand new and when you start to see it, there's going to be something you don't
expect. As soon as it is implemented in any company [there is] guaranteed success.
It's a catalyst for everything a corporation would want, and nobody is doing it but a few.
You're going to see more of those few, they're going to publish what they're doing and a
new paradigm is starting to be seen in business.
Appendix of Authorities
Every time a product is sold, someone is helped. There's internal funding in the
corporation for helping others. A Successful corporation will be measured not by its
profits, but by its compassion factor, just like you sometimes see an ecological factor
measured today.
Is it a green company or is it not? Is it a compassionate company or is it not?
What if compassion was something you wanted to see ... you'd be looking for it everywhere.
What if you designed an economic system so that part of the way it
worked helped people?
We're not talking about give-away programs; we're talking about compassionate
action.
Wait till you see a beautiful model, an esoteric business model that starts to have more
compassion than ever before. You help people without charging them, and those who you
do charge are helped as well.
It has to start with you. Those who will have a compassionate life are the ones that
are going to have the ideas we talked about the last time we channeled, the ones who will
invent compassionate economics in business, the one that will show their children what it's
like to be compassionate, to light ideas on this planet for new politics, new ways for having
integrity in medicine, even politics.
The Compassionate Factor is coming.
All you have to do is start with you.
Have you figured it out yet? You're feeling something perhaps? We're all connected. WE
are all connected. I speak to you from the Central Source.
We've been called the Creative Energy. We are connected, you and I, because a piece of
you is in me, and a piece of me is in you. The spark of the Creative God lives inside all
humans. I invite you to feel it, to believe it.
You're never§ alone. The love of God sits on you, ready to be part of you in whatever
degree you will allow, and that's the truth of the Shift today.
And so it is. [Kryon.com http://audio.kryon.com/en/Hamburg-Sunday-PM-16.mp3]
§ Kryon February 27, 2016 - "New Systems" - Here is where Kryon first mentions the "Department of Compassion" -
htip://audio.kryon.com/en/Kelowna-main-16.mp3
Appendix of Authorities
http://goldenageofgaia.com/2016/05/31 /transcript-archangel-michael-ahwaa-energy-surge-not-
seen-since-earths-beginnings/
Now, leadership: There are always going to be some at the head of the parade. And they
are the role models and the showers of the way, and the mentors so that, in the process of
entrainment, the human collective knows which way to head. Then there is leadership in
the melee of the masses, because not everyone can see the conductor at the head of the
parade.
So there are pathfinders and wayshowers in that general collective - and, might I
say to you, that this is one of the most difficult, challenging, rewarding and
important jobs that you can have.
Because what you are doing is putting yourself, literally at times, in the chaos -
whether it is esoterically, etherically, bi-location, inter -dimensional, it does not
matter, you are putting yourself in that school of humanity - and saying, "'Let's
turn this way, and that way."
And as you are walking and, yes, walking with all of us, you are pointing out
subtly, and not so subtly, what needs to be done in terms of building this new
world.
Then, there is leadership at the back of the parade. And, that is the shepherd who goes
and finds the lost Iamb and makes sure that they bring it back and that all are included.
...But, what does responsibility mean? It means trust: trust in yourself, trust in
each other. When you trust, what you are doing is calling forth the highest,
purest part not only of yourself, but those that you are placing trust in and with.
And that is the role of stewardship that is entrusted to you and entrusted to
others.
Now, will there be errors and mistakes, mishaps? A few. But you don't look at these as
tragedies. When a mishap occurs, it is a chance to come closer together, to forge
that bond of unity and community. "'Gosh! What did we do wrong? How did we
misstep? How can we come together more closely in our shared mission to do it
right? To do it better?"
When asked about the troubles in Brazil, Archangel Michael replied:
It is a very strong breakdown of existing systems. So, it is not just the people of Brazil to
whom we send great support and compassion. Because, what you are witnessing, and
living through, is this split. Now, we have said that many people are leaving, and that they
are welcomed home with wide-open arms and great fanfare.
But also what has come to the forefront, and you are seeing many examples of it
upon your planet, is this friction between those who want to cling to the old third
(density) regardless of the fact that it no longer exists. They believe, in their
arrogance, that they can recreate it and they are not willing to let go!
Now, it is past choice in that regard. We are not renewing the old third. You have a vague
memory of it so that you don't recreate the old third, but it simply won't be permitted at
this juncture. But see it, and send peace, and calm, and tranquility, faith and trust to these
areas where you are seeing such difficult, difficult transition.
It will be sorted out and it will be a very unexpected solution. So take faith, my
friends.
—Archangel Michael through Linda Dillon: Channel for the Council of Love
Memo from Stantec
For Public Hearing
Item #3
2015-2035
General Plan and
Final EIR
(3 Stantec Memo
To: Daniel Inloes, Senior Planner From: Daryl Zerfass
City of Costa Mesa Stantec
Fite: Costa Mesa General Plan Update Date: June 20, 2016
Traffic Analysis (2073007190)
Reference: Costa Mesa General Plan Update - Fairview Multi -Use Center Traffic Analysis
This memorandum summarizes the results of a supplemental traffic analysis conducted by Stantec
Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) to evaluate the Multi -Use Center designation that is being
considered for Fairview Developmental Center as part of the City of Costa Mesa General Plan
update. The Multi -Use Center development plans evaluated in this supplemental traffic analysis
were requested to be studied at the May 31, 2016 and June 14, 2016 Costa Mesa City Council
meetings. The plans involve a higher intensification of land use and trip generation compared to the
future development plan assumed for the Fairview Developmental Center site in the February 2016
City of Costa Mesa General Plan Update Traffic Analysis report prepared by Stantec. Table 1
(attached) summarizes the future land use and trip generation for the Fairview Developmental
Center site based on the current General Plan, the proposed General Plan, and the two proposed
Multi -Use Center development plans. The trip generation estimates are based on trip rates from the
Costa Mesa Traffic Model (CMTM), which is the traffic model that was applied in the General Plan
traffic study. As the table indicates, compared to the proposed General Plan scenario the
development Multi -Use Center plan proposed at the May 31, 2016 meeting generates 290 more AM
peak hour trips, 307 more PM peak hour trips and 2,400 more daily trips and the Multi -Use Center
development plan proposed at the June 14, 2016 meeting generates 502 more AM peak hour trips,
450 more PM peak hour trips and 2,984 more daily trips.
The potential traffic impacts of the proposed Multi -Use Center development plans were evaluated
based on year 2035 General Plan buildout conditions assuming the constrained highway network
scenario described in the General Plan update traffic analysis report. Table 2 (attached) summarizes
AM and PM peak hour intersection capacity utilization (ICU) values for intersection locations in the
vicinity of the Fairview Developmental Center under year 2035 traffic conditions based on the
proposed General Plan and the two proposed Multi -Use Center development plans (ICU worksheets
are attached at the end of this memorandum). As the table indicates, all of intersections that were
analyzed are forecast to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS) "D" or better under year
2035 conditions based on either of the two Multi -Use Center development plans (i.e., neither of the
two Multi -Use Center development plans proposed for the Fairview Developmental Center site result
in any significant traffic impacts).
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
Daryl Zerfass, PE, PTP
Principal, Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Attachments: Table 1 - Land Use and Trip Generation Summary (Fairview Developmental Center
Site)
Table 2 - Long -Range (2035) Intersection LOS Summary
Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Worksheets
Design with community In mind
\2073\ ac live\2073007190\correspond ence\ memos\ mem_cmgpu_fairview_mNed- use_ano lysis_20160620
Table 1 Land Use and Trip Generation Summary (Fairview Developmental Center Site)
Land Use
Units
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak
ADT
In Out Total
In Out "Total
CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
Hospital 1 350 Beds
333
130
463
165
333
498
4,529
Total Trip Generation
333
130 1
463
165
333
498
4,529
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
Medium Density Residential 200 DU
30
98
128
104
60
164
1,634
Hi -ah Density Residential 300 DU
30
123
153
120
66
186
1,995
Public Facility 52 Acres
2
2
4
4
4
8
98
Passive Park 26 Acres
1
1
2
2
2
4
49
Total Trip Generation
63
1 224
287
230
132
362
3,776
MAY 31, 2016 MIXED-USE CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Low Density Residential 250 DU
48
140
188
158
93
251
2,380
High Density Residential 332 DU
33
136
169
133
73
206
2,208
Institutional Office 139.66 TSF
191
27
218
35
173
208
1,540
Passive Park 25.65 Acres
1
1
2
2
2
4
48
Total Trip Generation
273
304 1
577
328
341
669
6,176
Difference (Compared to the Proposed General Plan
Trip Generation Increase
210
1 80 1
290
98
209
307
2,400
JUNE 14, 2016 MIXED-USE CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Low Density Residential
50 DU
10
28
38
32
19
51
476
Hi2h Density Residential
300 DU
30
123
153
120
66
186
1,995
Institutional Office
381.15 TSF
522
72
594
95
473
568
4,204
Passive Park
45 Acres
2
2
4
4
3
7
85
Total Trip Generation
564
225
789
251
561
812
6,760
Difference (Compared to the Proposed General Plan
Trip Generation Increase
501
1 1
502
21
429
450
2,984
Abbreviations: ADT- average daily trips
DU - dwelling unit
TSF - thousand square feet
Design with community In mind
\2073\active\2073007190\correspondence\memos\ mem_cmgpu_foirview_mixed-use_analysis_20160620
Table 2 Long -Range (2035) Intersection LOS Summary
Intersection
Proposed General Plan
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU LOS ICU LOS
May 31, 2016 Mixed -Use Center
Development Plan
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU LOS ICU LOS
June 14, 2016 Mixed -Use Center
Develo ment Plan
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU LOS ICU LOS
38. Harbor & 1-405 NB Romps
.81
D
.89
D
81
D
.90
D
.81
D
.90
D
39. Harbor & 1-405 SB Ramps
.62
B
.73
C
.63
B
.73
C
.63
B
.73
C
40. Fairview & 1-405 NB Ramps
.68
B
.75
C
.68
B
75
C
.68
B
.75
C
41, Fairview & 1-405 SB Rams
.65
B
70
B
.65
B
.70
B
.65
B
.70
B
44. Harbor & Gisler
.58
A
.78
C
.59
A
.78
C
.59
A
.78
C
45- Harbor & Date
.49
A
.60
A
49
A
.60
A
.49
A
.61 1
B
46. Harbor & Nutmeg
.48
A
.67
B
.48
A
67
B
.48
A
.67
B
47. Fairview & Paularino
.58
A
.57
A
.58
A
.57
A
.58
A
.57
A
56. Harbor & Baker
.55
A
.79
C
.56
A
.79
C
.55
A
.79
C
57. Colle e & Baker
.43
A
.65
B
.43
A
.65
B
.43
A
.65
B
58. Fairview & Baker
.77
C
.81
D
.78
C
.82
D
.77
C
.82
D
80. Shantar & Adams
.56
A
.69
B
.56
A
69
8
.57
A
.70
B
81. Placentia/Mesa Verde W & Adams
.85
D
.89
D
.86
D
.89
D
.86
D
.90
D
82. Mesa Verde E & Adams
.61
B
.66
B
.62
B
.67
B
.62
B
.67
B
.83. Royal Palm & Adams
.57
A
.76
C
.57
A
.76
C
.57
A
.76
C
84. Harbor & Adams
.86
D
.84
D
.86
D
.85
D
.87
D
.84
D
85. Pinecreek & Adams
.71
C
73
C
.72
C
.73
C
71
C
.73
C
86. Fairview & Adams
78
C
,75
C
79
C
76
C
.78
C
.76
C
88. Harbor & Mesa Verde
.51
A
.75
C
.53
A
.78
C
.53
A
75
C
90. Fairview & Arlin ton
.36
A
.47
A
.37
A
.47
A
.37
A
.47
A
91. Harbor & Merrimac
.49
A
.67
B
.49
A
.68
B
.49
A
,72
C
92. Fairview & Merrimac
36
A
.43
A
.37
A
-45
A
.36
A
.44
A
93. Newport SB & Mesa
.32
A
.65
B
.32
A
.65
B
_32
A
.65
B
94. Newport NB & Mesa
40
A
.52
A
.40
A
.52
A
.40
A
.52
A
95. Harbor & Fair
.45
A
.63
B
.47
A
.65
B
.51
A
.66
B
97. Fairview & Fair
.57
A
.68
B
.58
A
.69
B
.60
A
.68
B
100. Newport SB & Fair
35
A
.54
A
.35
A
55
A
.37
A
56
A
101. Newport NB & Del Mar
.79
C
54
A
.79
C
.56
A
.80
C
57
A
104. Harbor & Harbor Center
.52
A
.64
B
.53
A
.64
B
54
A
64
B
Design wlth community In mind
\2173\active\2073007190\corres ponde nce\m em os\mem_cm g pu_fairview_m aed-use_analysis-2016062D
Table 2 Long -Range (2035) Intersection LOS Summary (continued)
Design with community in mind
\2773\active\2073007190\correspondence\memos\ mem_cmgpu_fairview_mixed-use_ analysis_20160620
4
May 31, 2016 Mixed -Use Center
June 14, 2016 Mixed -Use Center
Proposed General Plan
Development Plan
Development Plan
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Intersection
ICU LOS
ICU
LOS
ICU LOS ICU LOS
ICU LOS
ICU LOS
116. Harbor & Wilson
.57 A
.69
B
.58 A .70 B
.58 A
.69 B
1 17. Fairview & Wilson
62 B
.86
D
.62 B .86 D
.62 B
.86 D
127. Harbor & Victoria
76 C
.87
D
76 C .88 D
.77 C
.87 D
Abbreviations: ICU -intersection capacity utilization
LOS - level of service
Design with community in mind
\2773\active\2073007190\correspondence\memos\ mem_cmgpu_fairview_mixed-use_ analysis_20160620
4
ATTACHMENTS
PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION CAPACITY
UTILIZATION (ICU) WORKSHEETS
Design with commurft In rind
\2073\active\2073007190\correspondence\memos\ me m_cmg pu_fairvi ew_mixed-u se_ana lysis_20160620
5
38. Harbor & I-405 NB Ramps
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 4 6800 2300 45* 1670 .33
NBR 0 0 1170 .69 1270 .,15
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 4 6800 2300 .34 3070 .45*
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0.
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 1.5 370 .22* 940
WBT 0 5100 0 0 (.35}*
WBR 1.5 820 .24 980
Right Turn Adjustment Multi .09* NBR .04*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,81 .89
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 4 6800 2300 .45* 1710 .34
NBR 0 0 1170 .69 1300 .76
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 4 6800 2330 .34 3080 .45*
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 1,5 370 .22* 940
WBT 0 5100 0 0 (.35)*
WBR 1.5 820 .24 980
Right Turn Adjustment Multi .09* NBR .05*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .81 .90
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 4 6800 2300 .45* 1670 ,33
NBR 0 0 1180 .69 1290 .76
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 4 6800 2320 .34 3080 .45*
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 1.5 370 .22* 940
WBT 0 5100 0 0 (.35)*
WBR 1.5 820 .24 980
Right Turn Adjustment Multi .09* NBR .05*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .81 .90
39. Harbor & I-405 SB
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3 5100 1390 27* 1740 .34
NBR f 270 490
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 4 6800 1510 .22 2760 .41*
SBR f 1190 1240
EBL 1.5 830 1.30}* 220 .13*
EBT 0 5100 0 (.30) 0
EBR 1.5 760 930 .27
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0
Right Turn Adjustment EBR .14*
Clearance Interval 05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3 5100 1400 .27* 1760 .35
NBR f 270 490
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 4 6800 1540 .23 2780 .41*
SBR f 1190 1240
EBL 1.5 830 (.31)* 220 .13*
EBT 0 5100 0 1.311 0
EBR 1.5 790 930 ..27
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0
Right Turn Adjustment EBR .14`
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .62 .73 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .63
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3 5100 1390 .27* 1810 .35
NBR f 270 490
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 4 6800 1550 ..23 2770 .41*
SBR f 1190 1240
EBL 1,5 830 [.:311* 220 .13*
EBT 0 5100 0 [.311 0
EBR 1.5 810 930 .27
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0
Right Turn Adjustment EBR .14*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .63 ..73
73
oI
40. Fairview & I-405 NB Ramps
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 270 .16* 320 .19*
NBT 3 5100 1160 .23 1580 .31
NBR 0 0 0 0
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 6 10200 1870 .18* 2500 .25*
SBR 1 1700 300 .18 260 .15
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0. 0
WBL 2 3400 520 .15* 900 .-26*
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 2 3400 1250 .37 980 .29
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .14*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .68 .75
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 270 .16* 320 .19*
NBT 3 5100 1160 .23 1610 .32
NBR 0 0 0 0
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 6 10200 1900 .19* 2500 .,25*
SBR 1 1700 300 .18 260 15
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 2 3400 520 .15* 900 .26*
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 2 3400 1250 ,.37 980 .29
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .13*
Clearance Interval .05* .,05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .68 .75
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 270 .16* 320 .19*
NBT 3 5100 1160 .23 1590 .31
NBR 0 0 0 0
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 6 10200 1880 .18* 2510 .25*
SBR 1 1700 300 ;18 260 :15
EBL 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 b 0
WBL 2 3400 520 .15* 900 .26*
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 2 3400 1250 .37 980 ..29
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .14*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,68 .75
0
41. Fairview 6 I-405 SB Ramps
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3.5 8500 1150 .23* 1400 1.211*
NBR 1.5 1180 .35 510 1.191
SBL 3 5100 1150 .23* 1490 .29*
SBT 3 5100 1210 .24 1900 .37
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 2 3400 310 .09* 510 .15*
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 2 3400 370 .11 440 .13
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0
Right Turn Adjustment NBR :05*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3.5 8500 1150 .23* 1410 1.211*
NBR 1.5 1180 .35 510 1.191
SBL 3 5100 1150 .23* 1490 .29*
SBT 3 5100 1220 .24 1910 .37
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 2 3400 310 .09* 510 .15*
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 2 3400 370 ..11 440 .13
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0
Right Turn Adjustment NBR 05*
Clearance Interval .05* 05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .65 .70 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,.65
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0. 0 0
NBT 3;5 8500 1150 .23* 1430 1.211*
NBR 1:5 1180 .35 510 1.191
SBL 3 5100 1150 .23* 1490 .29*
SBT 3 5100 1240 .24 1910 .37
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 2 3400 310 .09* 510 .15*
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 2 3400 370 .11 440 .13
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0
Right Turn Adjustment NBR .05*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .65 .70
.70
44. Harbor & Gisler
2035
Proposed General
Plan (Constrained
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
VOL
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
110
.06*
150
.09*
NBT
5
8500
2320
.27
2470
.29
NBR
0
0
10
SBL
30
1700
SBL
1
1700
100
.06
200
.12
SBT
4
6800
2320
.34*
3470
.51*
SBR
1
1700
160
.09
460
.27
EBL
3
5100
540
11
500
.10*
EBT
1
1700
60
.11*
30
.08
EBR
4
0
130
WBL
110
1700
WBL
1
1700
30
.02*
60
.04
WBT
1
1700
20
.01
50
.03*
WBR
1
1700
160
.09
130
.08
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
.05*
,05*
.05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
PM PK
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
.1
1700
110
.06*
150
.09*
NBT
5
8500
2330
.28
2490
.30
NBR
0
0
10
0
30
SBL
1
1700
100
..06
200
.12
SBT
4
6800
2370
,35*
3490
,51*
SBR
1
1700
160
,09
460
.27
EBL
3
5100
540
.11
500
.10*
EBT
1
1700
60
.11*
30
.08
EBR
0
0
130
0
110
WBL
i
1700
30
.02*
60
.04
WBT
1
1700
20
.01
50
.03*
WBR
1
1700
160
.09
130
.08
Clearance
Interval
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .58 .78 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 59
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
110
.06*
150
.09*
NBT
5
8500
2320
.27
2540
.30
NBR
0
0
10
30
SBL
1.
1700
100
.06
200
.12
SBT
4
6800
2410
.35*
3470
.51*
SBR
1
1700
160
.09
460
.27
EBL
3
5100
540
.11
500
.10*
EBT
1
1700
60
.11*
30
.08
EBR
0
0
130
110
WBL
1
1700
30
.02*
60
,04
WBT
1
1700
20
.01
50
03*
WBR
1
1700
160
.09
130
.08
Clearance Interval
.05*
,05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .59 .78
,78
45. Harbor 6 Date
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 30 .02 50 .;03*
NBT 4 6800 2450 .36* 2590 ..38
NBR 0 0 0 0
SBL 1 1700 50 .03* 50 .03
SBT 4 6800 2400 ..36 3030 .46*
SBR 0 0 30 70
EBL 0 0 40 40
EBT 1 1700 0 .05* 0 .06*
EBR 0 0 50 70
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 0 0 0 0.
WBR 0 0 0 0
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const, Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
30
.02
50
.03*
NBT
4
6800
2460
.36*
2620
.39
NBR
0
0
0
0
SBL
1
1700
50
.03*
50
.03
SBT
4
6800
2450
.36
3050
.46*
SBR
0
0
30
70
EBL
0
0
40
40
EBT
1
1700
0
.05*
0
.06*
EBR
0
0
50
70
WBL
0.
0
0
0
WBT
0
0
0
0
WBR
0
0
0
0
Clearance
Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .49 .60 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .49
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 30 .02 60 .09*
NBT 4 6800 2450 ::36* 2660 .39
NBR 0 0 0 0
SBL 1 1700 50 .03* 50 .03
SBT 4 6800 2490 .37 3030 .46*
SBR 0 0 30 70
EBL 0 0 40 40
EBT 1 1700 0 ;05* 0 .06*
EBR 0 0 50 70
WBL 0 0 0 4
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 0 0 0 0
Clearance Interval 05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .49 .61
.60
46. Harbor & Nutmeg
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 40 .02 80 .05*
NBT 4 6800 2250 .33* 2530 .37
NBR 1 1700 100 .06 160 .09
SBL 2 3400 100 .03* 190 .06
SBT 4 6800 2260 .34 2680 .41*
SBR 0 0 60 110
EBL 0 0 70 110
EBT 1 1700 10 .05* 20 .08*
EBR 1 1700 50 .03 60 .04
WBL 0 0 20 [.01)* 130 (.081*
WBT 1 1700 10 .02 10 .08
WBR 1 1700 90 .05 120 .07
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .01*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .48 .67
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 40 .02* 80 .05*
NBT 4 6800 2250 .33 2610 .38
NBR 1 1700 100 .06 160 .09
SBL 2 3400 100 .03 190 .06
SBT 4 6800 2350 .35* 2680 .41*
SBR 0 0 60 110
EBL 0 0 70 110
EBT 1 1700 10 .05* 20 .08*
EBR 1 1700 50 .03 60 .04
WBL 0. 0 20 [.01)* 130 [.08)*
WBT 1 1700 10 .02 10 .08
WBR 1 1700 90 .05 120 .07
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,:48 ,67
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
40
.02*
80
.05*
NBT
4
6800
2260
.33
2560
.38
NBR
1
1700
100
.06
160
.09
SBL
2
3400
100
.03
190
.06
SBT
4
6800
2310
.35*
2700
.41*
SBR
0
0
60
110
EBL
0
0
70
110
EBT
1
1700
10
.05*
20
- .08*
EBR
1
1700
50
.03
60
.04
WBL
fl
0
20
[.01)*
130
1.081*
WBT
1
1700
10
.02
10
.08
WBR
1
1700
90
.05
120
.07
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .48 .67
I d,
47. Fairview 6 Paularino
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL Q 0 0 0
NBT 3 5100 1980 .41* 1740 .37
NBR 0 0 110 150
SBL 1 1700 110 06* 150 .09
SBT 3 5100 1530 .30 2430 .48*
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 Q
EBT 0 0 0 Q
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 1 1700 80 .05* 70 .09*
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 1 1700 190 .11 160 .09
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .01*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const, Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3 5100 1980 .41* 1750 .37
NBR 0 0 110 150
SBL 1 1700 110 .06* 150 .09
SBT 3 5100 1540 .30 2440 .48*
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0. 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 1 1700 80 .05* 70 .04*
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 1 1700 190 .11 160 .09
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .01*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .58 .57 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .58 .57
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3 5100 1980 ..41* 1770 .38
NBR 0 0 110 150
SBL 1 1700 110 .06* 150 .09
SBT 3 5100 1560 .31 2440 .48*
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0.
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 1 1700 80 .05* 70 .04*
WBT Q 0 0 0
WBR 1 1700 190 .11 160 .09
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .01*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ..58 :57
i3
56. Harbor & Baker
2035
Proposed General
Plan (Constrained
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
CAPACITY VOL
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2
3400
50
.01
120
.04*
NBT
4
6800
2070
.30*
2120
.31
NBR
1
1700
270
.16
210
.12
SBL
2
3400
190
.06*
300
.09
SBT
4
6800
1880
.28
2800
.41*
SBR
1
1700
170
.10
420
.25
EBL
2
3400
270
.08*
280
.08*
EBT
2
3400
230
.07
230
.07
EBR
d
1700
60
.04
70
.04
WBL
2
3400
180
.05
590
.17
WBT
2
3400
190
.06*
710
.21*
WBR
1
1700
120
..07
230
.14
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
.05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2
3400
50
.01
120
.04*
NBT
4
6800
2080
.31*
2150
.32
NBR
1
1700
270
.16
210
.12
SBL
2
3400
190
.06*
300
:09
SBT
4
6800
1930
.28
2820
,41*
SBR
1
1700
170
.10
420
.25
EBL
2
3400
270
.08*
280
.08*
EBT
2
3400
230
.07
230
.07
EBR
d
1700
60
.04
70
.04
WBL
2
3400
180
.05
590
.17
WBT
2
3400
190
.06*
710
21*
WBR
1
1700
120
.07
230
.14
Clearance
Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .55 .79 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .56
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 50 .01 120 .04*
NBT 4 6800 2070 .30* 2200 ,32
NBR 1 1700 270 .16 220 .13
SBL 2 3400 190 .06* 300 .09
SBT 4 6800 1970 .29 2800 .41*
SBR 1 1700 170 .10 420 .25
EBL 2 3400 270 .08* 280 .08*
EBT 2 3400 230 .07 230 .07
EBR d 1700 60 .04 70 .04
WBL 2 3400 180 .05 590 .17
WBT 2 3400 190 .06* 710 .21*
WBR 1 1700 120 .07 230 .14
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .55 .79
..79
14
57. College & Baker
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 50 .03 200 .12*
NBT 1 1700 0 .11* 0 .05
NBR 0 0 180 80
SBL 1 1700 40 .02* 140 .08
SBT 1 1700 0 .02 0 .02*
SBR 0 0 30 40
EBL 1 1700 20 .01 20 .01*
EBT 2 3400 710 .21* 590 .17
EBR 1 1700 50 .03 110 .06
WBL 1 1700 70 04* 90 .05
WBT 2 3400 480 .16 1460 .45*
WBR 0 0 50 60
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
50
.03
200
.12*
NBT
1
1700
0
.11*
0
.05
NBR
0
0
180
80
SBL
1
1700
40
.02*
140
.08
SBT
1
1700
0
.02
0
.02*
SBR
0
0
30
40
EBL
1
1700
20
.01
20
.01*
EBT
2
3400
710
.21*
590
.17
EBR
1
1700
50
.03
110
.06
WBL
1
1700
70
.04*
90
.05
WBT
2
3400
480
.16
1460
.45*
WBR
0
0
50
60
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,43 .65 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .43 .65
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 50 .03 200 .12*
NBT 1 1700 0 .11* 0 .05
NBR 0 0 180 80
SBL 1 1700 40 .02* 140 .08
SBT I 1700 0 .02 0 .02*
SBR Q 0 30 40
EBL 1 1700 20 .01 20 .01*
EBT 2 3400 710 .21* 590 .17
EBR 1 1700 50 .03 110 ,06
WBL 1 1700 70 .04* 90 .05
WBT 2 3400 480 .16 1460 .45*
WBR 0 0 50 60
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .43 .65
115,
58. Fairview & Baker
2035
Proposed General
Plan (Constrained
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
CAPACITY
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2
3400
130
.04
230
.07
NBT
3
5100
1650
.32*
1450
.28*
NBR
1
1700
790
.46
520
.31
SBL
2
3400
280
.08*
300
.09*
SBT
9
6800
1150
.17
1730
.25
SBR
1
1700
190
.11
430
.25
EBL
2
3400
330
.10
260
.08*
EBT
2
3400
520
.15*
620
.18
EBR
1
1700
130
.08
160
.09
WBL
2
3400
390
.11*
540
.16
WBT
3
5100
320
.06
1600
.31*
WBR
1
1700
90
.05
130
.08
Right
Turn Adjustment
.07*
NBR
.06*
Clearance Interval
Clearance Interval
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
.05*
.05*
.05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2
3400
130
.04
230
.07
NBT
3
5100
1650
.32*
1460
.29*
NBR
1
1700
800
.47
530
.31
SBL
2
3400
280
.08*
300
.09*
SBT
4
6800
1160
.17
1740
.26
SBR
1
1700
190
.11
430
.25
EBL
2
3400
330
.10
260
.08*
EBT
2
3400
520
.15*
620
.18
EBR
1
1700
130
.08
160
.09
WBL
2
3400
390
.11*
540
.16
WBT
3
5100
320
.06
1600
.31*
WBR
1
1700
90
.05
130
.08
Right
Turn Adjustment
Turn Adjustment
NBR
.07*
.05*
Clearance Interval
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .77 .81 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .78
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2
3400
130
.04
230
.07
NBT
3
5100
1650
.32*
1480
.29*
NBR
1
1700
790
.46
540
.32
SBL
2
3400
280
.08*
300
.09*
SBT
4
6800
1180
.17
1730
.25
SBR
1
1700
190
.11
430
.25
EBL
2
3400
330
.10
260
.08*
EBT
2
3400
520
.15*
620
.18
EBR
1
1700
130
.08
160
.09
WBL
2
3400
400
.12*
540
.16
WBT
3
5100
320
.06
1600
.31*
WBR
1
1700
90
.05
130
.08
Right
Turn Adjustment
NBR
.05*
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .77 .82
.82
Jb
80. Shantar & Adams
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 30 .02* 30 .02*
NBT 1 1700 10 .01 10 .01
NBR 1 1700 110 .06 60 .04
SBL 1 1700 20 .01 20 .01
SBT 1 1700 10 .01* 10 .01*
SBR 1 1700 30 .02 20 .01
EBL 1 1700 30 .02 80 .05*
EBT 3 5100 2210 .44* 1170 .24
EBR 0 0 10 40
WBL 1 1700 20 .01* 90 .05
WBT 3 5100 810 .16 2820 .56*
WBR 0 0 10 20
Right Turn Adjustment NBR .03*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const, Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
30
.02*
30
.02*
NBT
1
1700
10
.01
10
.01
NBR
1
1700
110
.06
60
.04
SBL
1
1700
20
.01
20
.01
SBT
1
1700
10
.01*
10
.01*
SBR
1
1700
30
.02
20
.01
EBL
1
1700
30
.02
80
.05*
EBT
3
5100
2230
.44*
1170
.24
EBR
0
0
10
40
WBL
1
1700
20
.01*
90
.05
WBT
3
5100
810
.16
2840
.56*
WBR
0
0
10
20
Right
Turn Adjustment
NBR
.03*
Clearance Interval
.05*
,05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .56 .69 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .56
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 30 .02* 30 .02*
NBT 1 1700 10 .01 10 .01
NBR 1 1700 110 .06 60 .04
SBL i. 1700 20 .01 20 .01
SBT I 1700 10 .01* 10 .01*
SBR I 1700 30 .02 20 01
EBL 1 1700 30 .02 80 .05*
EBT 3 5100 2270 .45* 1170 .24
EBR 0 0 10 40
WBL 1 1700 20 .01* 90 .05
WBT 3 5100 820 .16 2870 .57*
WBR 0 0 10 20
Right Turn Adjustment NBR .03*
Clearance Interval 105* 105*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .57 .70
.69
17
81. Placentia/Mesa Verde W & Adams
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 230 .07 240 .07*
NBT 1 1700 210 .12* 140 .08
NBR 1 1700 250 .15 230 .14
SBL i 1700 40 .02* 50 .03
SBT 2 3400 210 .06 140 .04*
SBR 1 1700 70 .04 330 .19
EBL 1 1700 80 .05 60 .04*
EBT 3 5100 2920 .57* 1170 .23
EBR 1 1700 110 .06 350 .21
WBL 1 1700 150 ,09* 190 ,.11
WBT 3 5100 610 ,13 2860 ,57*
WBR 0 0 30 50
Right Turn Adjustment SBR .12*
Clearance Interval :05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 230 .07 240 ,01*
NBT 1 1700 210 .12* 140 08
NBR 1 1700 250 .15 230 .14
SBL 1 1700 40 .02* 50 .03
SBT 2 3400 210 .06 140 .04*
SBR 1 1700 70 .04 330 .19
EBL 1 1700 80 .05 60 .04*
EBT 3 5100 2940 .58* 1170 .23
EBR 1 1700 110 .06 350 .21
WBL 1 1700 150 .09* 190 .11
WBT 3 5100 610 .13 2880 .57*
WBR 0 0 30 50
Right Turn Adjustment SBR .12*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .85 .89 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .86
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2
3400
230
..07
240
07*
NBT
1
1700
210
..12*
140
,08
NBR
1
1700
250
..15
230
,14
SBL
1
1700
40
.02*
50
.03
SBT
2
3400
210
.06
140
.04*
SBR
1
1700
70
.04
330
.19
EBL
1
1700
80
.05
60
604*
EBT
3
5100
2980
.58*
1180
,23
EBR
1
1700
110
.06
350
.21
WBL
1
1700
150
109*
190
.11
WBT
3
5100
620
.13
2910
.58*
WBR
0
0
30
50
Right
Turn Adjustment
SBR
.12*
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .86 .90
89
82. Mesa Verde E & Adams
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1.15 80 1.04)* 210
NBT 0.5 3400 70 .04 60 ..08*
NBR 1 1700 80 .05 110 :06
SBL 1' 1700 30 .02 50 .03*
SBT 2 3400 100 .03* 80 .02
SBR 1 1700 60 .04 160 .09
EBL 1 1700 60 .04 50 03*
EBT 3 5100 2280 .45* 1620 .32
EBR 1 1700 270 .16 140 .08
WBL 1 1700 60 .04* 10 .01
WBT 3 5100 590 .13 2110 .43*
WBR 0 0 80 80
Right Turn Adjustment SBR .04*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1.5 90 (.05)* 230
NBT 0.5 3400 70 .05 60 .09*
NBR 1 1700 80 .05 110 .06
SBL 1 1700 30 .02 50 .03*
SBT F 3400 100 .03* 80 .02
SBR 1 1700 60 .04 160 .09
EBL 1 1700 60 .04 50 .03*
EBT 3 5100 2280 45* 1620 .32
EBR 1 1700 290 .17 140 .08
WBL 1 1700 60 .04* 10 .01
WBT 3 5100 590 .13 2110 .43*
WBR 0 0 80 80
Right Turn Adjustment SBR 04*
Clearance Interval ;05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .61 .66 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1.5 90 {.05)* 260
NBT 0.5 3400 70 .05 60 .09*
NBR 1 1700 80 .05 110 .06
SBL 1 1700 30 .02 50 .03*
SBT 2 3400 100 .03* 80 .02
SBR 1 1700 60 .04 160 .09
EBL 1 1700 60 .04 50 .03*
EBT 3 5100 2280 .45* 1620 .32
EBR 1 1700 330 .19 140 .08
WBL 1 1700 60 .04* 10 .01
WBT 3 5100 590 .13 2110 .43*
WBR 0 0 80 80
Right Turn Adjustment SBR 04*
Clearance Interval ..05* ..05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .62 ..67
62 .67
19
83. Royal Palm & Adams
2035
Proposed General
Plan (Constrained
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
CAPACITY VOL
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
20
.01*
120
.07*
NBT
1
1700
10
.02
50
.05
NBR
0
0
20
SBL
30
1700
SBL
1
1700
20
.01
60
.04
SBT
1
1700
10
,05*
30
.14*
SBR
0
0
70
EBL
210
1700
EBL
1
1700
40
.02
80
.05*
EBT
3
5100
2270
.45*
1030
.22
EBR
0
0
30
WBL
80
1700
WBL
1
1700
10
,01*
40
.02
WBT
3
5100
750
,15
2300
,45*
WBR
1
1700
30
.02
60
.04
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
.05*
.05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
20
.01*
120
.07*
NBT
1
1700
10
.02
50
.05
NBR
0
0
20
0
30
SBL
1700
20
Al
60
,04
SBT
k
1700
10
,05*
30
,14*
SBR
p
0
70
0
210
EBL
1
1700
40
.02
80
.05*
EBT
3
5100
2270
.45*
1030
.22
EBR
0
0
30
0
80
WBL
I
1700
10
.101*
40
.02
WBT
3
5100
750
,15
2300
,45*
WBR
1
1700
30
02
60
.04
Clearance
Interval
Clearance Interval
.,05*
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 57 .76 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,57
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
20
.01*
120
.07*
NBT
1
1700
10
.02
50
.05
NBR
0
0
20
30
SBL
1
1700
20
,01
60
.04
SBT
1
1700
10
.05*
30
.14*
SBR
0
0
70
210
EBL
1
1700
40
;02
80
.05*
EBT
3
5100
2270
45*
1030
.22
EBR
0
0
30
80
WBL
1
1700
10
.01*
40
.02
WBT
3
5100
750
.15
2300
.45*
WBR
1
1700
30
;02
60
.04
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .57 .76
,76
o
84. Harbor 6 Adams
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 3 5100 180 .04 600 .12*
NBT 3 5100 1540 .30* 1740 .34
NBR 1 1700 80 .05 190 .11
SBL 2 3400 380 .11* 330 .10
SBT 4 6800 1400 .21 2340 .34*
SBR 2 3400 200 .06 770 .23
EBL 3 5100 860 .17 370 .07*
EBT 3 5100 1840 .36* 760 .15
EBR 1 1700 150 .09 140 .08
WBL 2 3400 120 .04* 180 .05
WBT 3 5100 390 .08 1340 .26*
WBR 1 1700 60 .04 290 .17
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
3
5100
180
.04
600
.12,
NBT
3
5100
1550
.30*
1770
.35
NBR
1
1700
80
.05
190
.11
SBL
2
3400
380
.11*
330
.10
SBT
4
6800
1460
.21
2360
,35*
SBR
2
3400
200
.06
770
.23
EBL
3
5100
860
.17
370
.07*
EBT
3
5100
1840
.36*
760
.15
EBR
d
1700
150
.09
140
.08
WBL
2
3400
130
.09*
180
.05
WBT
3
5100
390
.08
1340
.26*
WBR
1
1700
60
.04
290
.17
Clearance Interval
.17
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .86 .84 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .86
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
3
5100
180
.04
600
.12
NBT
3
5100
1540
.30*
1820
.36*
NBR
1
1700
80
.05
190
.11
SBL
2
3400
380
.11*
330
.10*
SBT
4
6800
1500
.22
2340
.34
SBR
2
3400
200
.06
770
.23
EBL
3
5100
860
.17
370
.07*
EBT
3
5100
1840
.36*
760
.15
EBR
1
1700
150
.09
140
.08
WBL
2
3400
160
.05*
180
.05
WBT
3
5100
390
.08
1340
.26*
WBR
1
1700
60
.04
290
.17
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .87 .84
.85
z[
85. Pinecreek & Adams
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1.5 40 (.O1)* 450 1.141*
NBT 0.5 3400 10 .01 40 .14
NBR 1 1700 40 .02 190 .11
SBL 0 0 80 50
SBT 1 1700 60 .08* 50 .06*
SBR 1 1700 60 .04 80 .05
EBL 1 1700 40 .02 50 .03*
EBT 3 5100 1680 .47* 810 .24
EBR 0 0 740 430 .25
WBL 2 3400 350 .10* 270 .08
WBT 2 3400 530 .17 1350 .45*
WBR 0 0 60 170
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1.5
40
[.01)*
450
[,14)*
NBT
0.,5
3400
10
.01
40
.14
NBR
1
1700
40
.02
190
.11
SBL
0
0
80
50
SBT
1
1700
60
.08*
50
.06*
SBR
1
1700
60
.04
80
.05
EBL
1
1700
40
.02
50
.03*
EBT
3
5100
1690
.48*
830
.24
EBR
0
0
740
430
.25
WBL
2
3400
350
.10*
270
.08
WBT
2
3400
540
.18
1350
.45*
WBR
0
0
60
170
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .71 .73 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .72
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1.5 40 [,01)* 450 [.14)*
NBT 0.5 3400 10 .01 40 .14
NBR 1 1700 40 .02 190 .11
SBL 0 0 80 50
SBT 1 1700 60 .08* 50 .06*
SBR 1 1700 60 .04 80 .05
EBL I 1700 40 .02 50 .03*
EBT 3 5100 1680 .47* 850 .25
EBR 0 0 740 430 .25
WBL 2 3400 350 .10* 270 .08
WBT 2 3400 570 .19 1350 .45*
WBR 0 0 60 170
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .71 .73
..13
0�
a_
86. Fairview 6 Adams
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 70 .02 440 .13*
NBT 3 5100 900 .19* 1250 .25
NBR 0 0 90 40
SBL .1 1700 60 09* 50 .03
SBT 3 5100 880 ,17 1210 .24*
SBR f 640 1130
EBL 2 3400 1510 ,44* 820 .24*
EBT 1 1700 100 .06 120 .07
EBR 1 1700 200 ,12 200 ,12
WBL .0,5 80 50
WBT 1.5 3400 130 ,06* 260 .09*
WBR 1 1700 50 ,03 60 .04
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2
3400
70
.02
440
.13*
NBT
3
5100
900
.19*
1250
.25
NBR
0
0
90
40
SBL
1
1700
60
.04*
50
;03
SBT
3.
5100
880
17
1210
,24*
SBR
f
650
1130
EBL
2
3400
1520
.45*
840
.25*
EBT
1
1700
100
.06
120
.07
EBR
1
1700
200
.12
200
.12
WBL
0.5
80
50
WBT
1.5
3400
130
.06*
260
.09*
WBR
1
1700
50
.03
60
.04
Clearance
Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,78 .,75 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,79
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 70 .02 440 ::13*
NBT 3 5100 900 .19* 1250 :25
NBR 0 0 90 40
SBL 1 1700 60 .04* 50 .03
SBT 3 5100 880 .17 1210 .24*
SBR f 680 1130
EBL 2 3400 1510 ,44* 860 ,25*
EBT 1 1700 100 .06 120 .07
EBR 1 1700 200 .12 200 ,12
WBL _6 5 80 50
WBT 1,5 3400 130 ,06* 260 .09*
WBR 1 1700 50 .03 60 :04
Clearance Interval .05* ,05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .78 .76
76
88. Harbor & Mesa Verde
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 110 .03 530 .16*
NBT 3 5100 1520 .30* 2260 .45
NBR 0 0 20 60
SBL 1 1700 20 .01* 40 .02
SBT 3 5100 1330 .27 1870 .42*
SBR 0 0 60 280
EBL 1 1700 130 .08 100 .06*
EBT 0.5 3400 60 (.13)* 30 (.03)
EBR 1.5 430 270
WBL 1 1700 40 ,02* 120 07
WBT 1 1700 20 ,02 70 06*
WBR 0 0 10 30
Clearance Interval .05* ,fly*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 110 .03* 530 .16*
NBT 3 5100 1530 .30 2270 .46
NBR 0 0 20 60
SBL 1 1700 20 .01 40 .02
SBT 3 5100 1400 .29* 1870 .43*
SBR 0 0 60 300
EBL 1 1700 130 .08 130 .08*
EBT 0.5 3400 70 (.14)* 50 (.03)
EBR 1.5 430 270
WBL 1 1700 40 .02* 120 .07
WBT 1 1700 20 .02 70 .06*
WBR 0 0 10 30
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION w5l .75 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .53
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 110 .03* 530 .16*
NBT 3 5100 1520 30 2340 .47
NBR 0 0 20 60
SBL 1 1700 20 01 40 ,02
SBT 3 5100 1460 .30* 1870 .42*
SBR 0 0 60 280
EBL 1 1700 130 .08 110 .06*
EBT 0.5 3400 60 (.13)* 70 (.04)
EBR 1.5 430 270 (.04)
WBL 1 1700 40 .02* 120 .07
WBT 1 1700 20 .02 70 .06*
WBR 0 0 10 30
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .53 ,75
78
a�
90. Fairview 6 Arlington
2035
Proposed General
Plan (Constrained
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
CAPACITY
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2
3400
80
.02
70
.02*
NBT
3:
5100
930
.18*
1230
.24
NBR
1
1700
260
.15
40
.02
SBL
2
3400
190
.06*
20
.01
SBT
3
5100
870
.17
1390
.27*
SBR
1
1700
50
.03
60
.04
EBL
1
1700
10
.01*
60
.04
EBT
1
1700
20
.01
80
.05*
EBR
1
1700
10
.01
120
.07
WBL
1.5
190
180
[,081*
240
[.08)*
WBT
0,5
3400
40
.06*
20
.08
WBR
1
1700
130
.08
170
.10
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
.05*
.05*
.05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
.2
3400
80
.02
70
.02*
NBT
3
5100
930
.18*
1230
.24
NBR
1
1700
260
.15
50
.03
SBL
2
3400
190
.06*
20
.01
SBT
3
5100
870
.17
1390
.27*
SBR
1
1700
50
.03
60
.04
EBL
1
1700
10
.01*
60
.04
EBT
1
1700
20
.01
80
.05*
EBR
1
1700
10
.01
120
.07
WBL
1.5
1.5
190
190
250
[,081*
WBT
0.5
3400
40
.07*
20
.08
WBR
1
1700
130
.08
170
.10
Clearance
Interval
.05*
.05*
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .36 .47 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2
3400
80
.02
70
.02*
NBT
3
5100
930
.18*
1230
.24
NBR
1
1700
260
.15
60
.04
SBL
2
3400
190
.06*
20
.01
SBT
3
5100
870
.17
1390
.27*
SBR
1
1700
50
.03
60
.04
EBL
1
1700
10
i01*
60
.04
EBT
1
1700
20
r01
80
.05*
EBR
1
1700
10
.,01
120
.07
WBL
1.5
190
240
1.081*
WBT
0.5
3400
40
.07*
20
.08
WBR
1
1700
130
.08
170
.10
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .37 .47
37
47
91. Harbor 6 Merrimac
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 20 .01 30 02
NBT 3 5100 1490 .31* 2340 .48*
NBR 0 0 90 110
SBL 2 3400 240 :07* 150 ,04*
SBT 3 5100 1450 .30 2350 .47
SBR 0 0 60 70
EBL 1 1700 60 .04 40 02*
EBT 1 1700 40 .05* 10 02
EBR 0 0 40 30
WBL 1 1700 20 .01* 50 .03
WBT 0.5 3400 10 (.011 30 (.081*
WBR 1.5 70 280
Clearance Interval .05* 105*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const, Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
20
.01
30
.02
NBT
3
5100
1490
.31*
2340
.48*
NBR
0
0
90
110
SBL
2
3400
240
,07*
150
.04*
SBT
3
5100
1450
.31
2350
.47
SBR
0
0
130
70
EBL
I
1700
70
.04
50
EBT
I
1700
40
.05*
20
.03
EBR
0
0
40
30
WBL
1
1700
20
.01*
50
.03
WBT
0.5
3400
10
1.011
50
(.08)*
WBR
1.5
70
280
Clearance
Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .49 .67 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .49 ,68
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 20 .01 30 .02
NBT 3 5100 1490 .31* 2340 .48*
NBR 0 0 90 110
SBL 2 3400 240 .07* 150 .04*
SBT 3 5100 1450 .32 2350 .47
SBR 0 0 190 70
EBL 1 1700 60 .04 120 .07*
EBT 1 1700 40 :05* 30 .04
EBR 0 0 40 30
WBL 1 1700 20 .01* 50 .03
WBT 0,5 3400 20 1.011 30 1.081*
WBR 1.5 70 280
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .49 72
92. Fairview & Merrimac
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 40 .01 180 .05*
NBT 3 5100 1270 .25* 1330 .26
NBR 1 1700 0 .00 10 .01
SBL 2 3400 0 :00 0 .00
SBT 3 5100 1030 .20 1640 .32*
SBR 1 1700 50 .03 90 .05
EBL 1.5 70 [.02)* 50 [.01)*
EBT 0.5 3400 0 .02 0 .01
EBR 1 1700 170 .10 90 .05
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 2 3400 0 ,00* 0 ,00*
WBR 0 0 0 10
Right Turn Adjustment EBR .04*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 40 .01 190 .06*
NBT 3 5100 1270 .25* 1330 .26
NBR 1 1700 0 .00 10 .01
SBL 2 3400 0 .00 0 .00
SBT 3 5100 1030 .20 1640 .32*
SBR 1 1700 60 .04 100 .06
EBL 1.5 70 [.02)* 60 [.02)*
EBT 0::5 3400 0 .02 0 .02
EBR 1 1700 180 .11 90 .05
WBL p 0 0 0
WBT 2 3400 0 .00* 0 .00*
WBR 0 0 10
Right Turn Adjustment EBR ,05*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 36 .43 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .37
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3400 40 .01 180 .05*
NBT 3 5100 1270 .25* 1330 .26
NBR 1 1700 0 .00 10 .01
SBL 2 3400 0 .00 0 .00
SBT 3 5100 1030 .20 1640 .32*
SBR 1 1700 60 .04 90 .05
EBL 1.5 70 [.02)* 60 [.02)*
EBT 0.5 3400 0 .02 0 .02
EBR 1 1700 170 .10 90 .05
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 2 3400 0 .00* 0 .00*
WBR 0 0 0 10
Right Turn Adjustment EBR ,04*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 36 .44
45
93. Newport SB 6 Mesa
2035
Proposed General
Plan (Constrained
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
0
0
0
0
NBT
0
0
0
0
NBR
0
0
0
0
SBL
1
1700
350
.21*
450
.26
SBT
4
6800
1120
.16
2760
.41*
SBR
1
1700
10
.01
10
.01
EBL
0
0
0
0
EBT
1
1700
10
.01*
20
.01*
EBR
1
1700
10
.01
10
.01
WBL
1
1700
90
.05*
310
.18*
WBT
1
1700
10
.01
10
,01
WBR
0
0
0
0
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 0 0 0 0
NBR 0 0 0 0
SBL 1 1700 350 .21* 460 .27
SBT 4 6800 1170 .17 2780 .41*
SBR 1 1700 10 .01 10 .01
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 1 1700 10 .01* 20 .01*
EBR 1 1700 10 .01 10 .01
WBL 1 1700 90 .05* 310 .18*
WBT 1 1700 10 .01 10 .01
WBR 0 0 0 0
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .32 .65 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .32
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 0 0 0 0'
NBR 0 0 0 .0
SBL 1 1700 350 .21* 460 .27
SBT 4 6800 1230 .18 2760 .41*
SBR 1 1700 10 .01 10 .01
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 1 1700 10 ..01* 20 .01*
EBR 1 1700 10 .01 10 .01
WBL 1 1700 90 .05* 310 .18*
WBT 1 1700 10 .01 10 .01
WBR 0 0 0 0
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .32 .65
65
2-0
94. Newport NB & Mesa
2035
Proposed General
Plan (Constrained
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
20
.01
30
,02
NBT
2
3400
730
.25*
580
.20*
NBR
0
0
110
100
SBL
0
0
0'
0
SBT
0
0
0
0
SBR
0
0
Q,
0
EBL
2
3400
70
.02*
270
.08*
EBT
1
1700
120
.07
260
.15
EBR
0
0
0
0
WBL
0
0
0
0
WBT
1
1700
70
,08*
270
.19*
WBR
0
0
70
50
Clearance Interval
.05*
,05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 20 .01 30 .02
NBT 2 3400 730 .25* 580 .20*
NBR 0 0 110 100
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0
SBR 0 0 4 0
EBL 2 3400 70 .02* 270 ,03*
EBT 1 1700 120 .07 260 .15
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 1 1700 70 .08* 270 .19*
WBR 0 0 70 50
Clearance Interval .05* :'05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .40 .52 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,40
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 20 .01 30 .02
NBT 2 3400 730 .25* 580 .20*
NBR 0 0 110 100
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 2 3400 70 .02* 280 .08*
EBT 1 1700 120 .07 270 .16
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 1 1700 70 .08* 270 .19*
WBR 0 0 70 50
Clearance Interval .05* ,05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .40 .52
,52
95. Harbor & Fair
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 40 .02 20 .01
NBT 3 5100 1330 .26* 1870 .37*
NBR 1 1700 300 .18 130 .08
SBL 2 3400 230 .07* 270 .08*
SBT 3 5100 1160 .24 1920 .38
SBR 0 0 60 20
EBL 1 1700 40 ,.02* 20 .01
EBT 1 1700 40 :.02 40 .02*
EBR 1 1700 40 .02 30 .02
WBL 2 3400 130 .04 390 .11*
WBT 0.5 3400 70 1.051* 40 (.101
WBR 1.5 180 390
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
40
.02
20
.01
NBT
3
5100
1350
,26*
1880
.37*
NBR
1
1700
300
.18
130
.08
SBL
2
3400
250
.07*
330
.10*
SBT
3'
5100
1170
.24
1940
.38
SBR
A
0
60
60
20
20
EBL
1
1700
40
.02*
20
.01
EBT
1
1700
40
.02
40
.02*
EBR
1
1700
40
02
30
.02
WBL
2
3400
130
.04
390
.11*
WBT
0.5
3400
70
(.07)*
40
(.101
WBR
1.5
1.5
240
350
420
390
Clearance Interval
Clearance Interval
05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .;45 ,.53 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
40
.02
20
.01
NBT
3
5100
1390
.27*
1870
..37*
NBR
1
1700
300
.18
130
;08
SBL
2
3400
230
.07*
370
.11*
SBT
3
5100
1160
.24
1970
.39
SBR
0
0
60
20
EBL
1
1700
40
.02*
20
.01
EBT
1
1700
40
,02
40
.02*
EBR
1
1700
40
.02
30
.02
WBL
2
3400
130
.04
390
.11*
WBT
0.5
3400
70
[.101*
40
[.091
WBR
1.5
350
390
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .51 .66
47 .65
30
97. Fairview & Fair
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 60 .04 90 .05
NBT 3 5100 550 .11* 690 .14*
NBR 1 1700 150 .09 50 .03
SBL 2 3400 410 .12* 510 .15*
SBT 3 5100 550 .11 800 .16
SBR 1 1700 140 .08 130 .08
EBL 1 1700 250 .15* 100 ,06*
EBT 2 3400 670 .20 300 ,09
EBR 1 1700 20 .01 30 ..02
WBL 1 1700 20 .01 40 .02
WBT 1.5 5100 260 (,141* 940 [.281*
WBR 1,5 620 680
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .57 .68
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
70
.04
90
.05
NBT
3
5100
550
.11*
690
.14*
NBR
1
1700
150
.09
50
.03
SBL
2
3400
410
.12*
510
.15*
SBT
3
5100
550
.11
800
.16
SBR
1
1700
140
:08
130
.08
EBL
1
1700
250
.15*
100
.06*
EBT
2
3400
670
.20
390
.11
EBR
1
1700
20
,.01
30
.02
WBL
1
1700
20
.01
40
.02
WBT
1.5
5100
410
[,171*
940 [.28)*
(.291*
WBR
1.5
620
680
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,60 ,68
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const.
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
60
.04
90
.05
NBT
3
5100
550
.11*
690
.14*
NBR
1
1700
150
.09
50
.03
SBL
2
3400
420
.12*
510
.15*
SBT
3
5100
550
.11
800
.16
SBR
1
1700
140
.08
130
.08
EBL
1
1700
250
.15*
100
.06*
EBT
2
3400
690
.20
350
.10
EBR
1
1700
30
.02
30
.02
WBL
1
1700
20
.01
40
.02
WBT
1.5
5100
310
[.151*
970
(.291*
WBR
1.5
620
690
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .58 .69
�I
100. Newport SB & Fair
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 0 0 0 0
NBR 0 0 0 0
SBL 1 1700 130 .08 270 .16
SBT 3 5100 440 .09* 1770 .35*
SBR 2 3400 630 .19 1050 .31
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 4 6800 990 .15* 620 .09*
EBR 0 0 40 10
WBL 1 1700 100 06* 90 .05*
WBT 2 3400 150 .04 410 .12
WBR 0 0 0 0
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt, (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 0 0 0 0
NBR 0 0 0 0
SBL 1 1700 130 .08 270 .16
SBT 3 5100 440 .09* 1770 .35*
SBR 2 3400 680 .20 1070 .31
EBL 4 0 0 0
EBT 4 6800 1010 .15* 670 .10*
EBR fl 0 40 10
WBL 1 1700 100 .06* 90 .05*
WBT 2 3400 160 .05 420 .12
WBR 0 0 0 0
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .35 .54 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .35
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0 0 .0 0
NBT 0 0 0
NBR 0 0 0; 0
SBL 1 1700 130 .08 270 .16
SBT 3 5100 440 .09* 1770 .35*
SBR 2 3400 740 .22 1050 .31
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 4 6800 990 .15* 710 .11*
EBR 0 0 40 10
WBL 1 1700 100 .06* 90 .05*
WBT 2 3400 190 ,06 410 .12
WBR 0 0 0 0
Right Turn Adjustment SBR .02*
Clearance Interval .05* ,05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .37 .56
55
31Z
101. Newport NB & Del Mar
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0.5 40 160
NBT 2.5 5100 1570 .34* 880 .23*
NBR 0 100 130
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 2 3400 970 .29* 520 .15*
EBT 2 3400 220 .06 420 ..12
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 0 a 0 0
WBT 1.5 5100 200 ,11* 370 .11*
WBR 1:5 360 120 .07
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const, Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0.5 40 160
NBT 2.5 5100 1570 .34* 880 ,23*
NBR 0 100 130
SBL 0 0 .0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0
SBR 0 0 0. 0
EBL 2 3400 980 ..29* 570 .17*
EBT 2 3400 230 .07 420 .12
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 1.5 5100 210 .11* 380 .11*
WBR 1.5 360 120 .07
Clearance Interval ;05* :05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .79 .54 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .79
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 0.5 40 160
NBT 2.5 5100 1570 .34* 880 .23*
NBR 0 100 130
SBL 0 0 0 0
SBT 0 0 0 0
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 2 3400 970 .29* 600 .18*
EBT 2 3400 220 .06 430 .13
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 1.5 5100 240 .12* 370 .11*
WBR 1.5 360 120 .07
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .80 .57
56
104. Harbor & Harbor Center
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL VIC VOL VIC
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3 5100 1870 .38* 1930 ,40*
NBR 0 0 90 100
SBL 1 1700 80 .05* 180 .11*
SBT 3 5100 1460 .29 2420 .47
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0:. 0 0
EBT 0 D 0
EBR 8 0
WBL 1 1700 60 .04* 130 .08*
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 1 1700 90 .05 150 .09
Clearance Interval ,05* ,05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,52 .64
2035 June 14 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL VIC VOL VIC
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3 5100 1930 .40* 1930 ,40*
NBR 0 0 90 100
SBL 1 1700 80 .05* 180 .11*
SBT 3 5100 1460 .29 2470 .48
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 1 1700 60 .04* 130 ,08*
WBT 0. 0 0 0
WBR 1 1700 90 .05 150 .09
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ,54 ,64
2035 May 31 Multi -Use Center Alt. (Const, Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL VIC VOL VIC
NBL 0 0 0 0
NBT 3 5100 1890 .39* 1940 .40*
NBR b 0 90 100
SBL 1 1700 80 ,05* 180 .11*
SBT 3 5100 1470 .29 2440 .48
SBR 0 0 0 0
EBL 0 0 0 0
EBT 0 0 0 0
EBR 0 0 0 0
WBL 1 1700 60 .04* 130 .08*
WBT 0 0 0 0
WBR 1 1700 90 .05 150 .09
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .53
.64
31
116. Harbor & Wilson
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 40 ,02 110 .06
NBT 3. 5100 1440 .28* 1650 .32*
NBR 1. 1700 120 .07 140 .08
SBL 1 1700 70 .04* 150 .09*
SBT 3 5100 1030 20 1640 .32
SBR 1 1700 100 .06 280 .16
EBL 2 3400 260 .08 250 .07*
EBT 2 3400 470 .14* 240 .07
EBR 1 1700 30 .02 70 .04
WBL 2 3400 210 .06* 410 .12
WBT 2 3400 210 .06 540 .16*
WBR 1 1700 70 .04 130 .08
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
40
.02
110
.06
NBT
3
5100
1460
.29*
1660
.33*
NBR
1
1700
120
.07
140
.08
SBL
1
1700
70
.04*
150
.09*
SBT
3
5100
1040
.20
1660
.33
SBR
1
1700
100
.06
280
.16
EBL
.2
3400
260
.08
250
.07*
EBT
2
3400
470
.14*
240
.07
EBR
1
1700
30
.02
70
.04
WBL
2
3400
210
.06*
410
.12
WBT
2
3400
210
06
540
.16*
WBR
1
1700
70
.04
130
.08
Clearance Interval
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .57 .69 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .58
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
40
.02
110
.06
NBT
3
5100
1490
.29*
1650
.32*
NBR
1
1700
120
.07
140
.08
SBL
1
1700
70
.04*
150
.09*
SBT
3
5100
1030
.20
1690
.33
SBR
1
1700
100
.06
280
.16
EBL
2
3400
270
.08
250
.07*
EBT
21
3400
470
.14*
240
.07
EBR
1
1700
30
.02
70
.04
WBL
2
3400
210
.06*
410
.12
WBT
2
3400
210
.06
540
.16*
WBR
1
1700
70
.,04
130
.08
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .58 .69
70
35�
117. Fairview & Wilson
2035 Proposed General Plan (Constrained Network)
AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1700 80 .05* 180 .11*
NBT 2 3400 280 .09 570 .17
NBR 0 0 40 20
SBL 1 1700 120 .07 50 .03
SBT 2 3400 410 .12* 660 .19*
SBR 1 1700 130 .08 240 .14
EBL 1 1700 190 .11 230 .14*
EBT 1 1700 650 .39* 380 .25
EBR 0 0 20 40
WBL 1 1700 10 .01* 40 .02
WBT 1 1700 200 .18 510 .37*
WBR 0 0 100 120
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const,
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
80
.05*
180
.11*
NBT
2
3400
280
.09
570
.17
NBR
0
0
40
20
SBL
1
1700
120
.07
50
.03
SBT
2
3400
410
.12*
660
.19*
SBR
1
1700
130
.08
240
.14
EBL
1
1700
190
,11
230
.14*
EBT
1
1700
650
.39*
380
.25
EBR
0
0
20
40
WBL
1
1100
10
.01*
40
.02
WBT
1
1700
200
.18
510
.37*
WBR
0
0
100
120
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 62 .86 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
80
.05
180
.11*
NBT
2
3400
290
.10*
570
.17
NBR
D.
0
40
20
SBL
1
1700
120
07*
50
.03
SBT
2
3400
410
.12
660
.19*
SBR
1
1700
130
;:08
240
.14
EBL
1
1700
190
111
230
.14*
EBT
1
1700
650
.39*
380
,25
EBR
0
0
20
40
WBL
1.
1700
10
.01*
40
.02
WBT
1
1700
200
.18
510
.37*
WBR
0
0
100
120
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION ;62 .86
62 .86
3��
127. Harbor & Victoria
2035
Proposed
General
Plan (Constrained
Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
V/C
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
50
.03
140
.08
NBT
3
5100
920
.18*
1490
.29*
NBR
1.
1700
120
.07
150
.09
SBL
1
1700
70
.04*
120
.07*
SBT
3
5100
920
.18
1310
.26
SBR
1
1700
130
.08
410
.24
EBL
2 _
3400
420
,12
250
.07*
EBT
2
3400
1570
.46*
660
.19
EBR
1
1700
90
,05
130
.08
WBL
2
3400
110
.03*
140
.04
WBT
2
3400
580
.17
1330
,39*
WBR
1
1700
90
.05
80
,05
Clearance Interval
.05*
105*
2035 May 31 Multi -Use
Center Alt. (Const, Network)
Center Alt, (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
50
.03
140
.08
NBT
3
5100
940
.18*
1500
.29*
NBR
1
1700
120
.07
150
.09
SBL
I
1700
70
.04*
130
.08*
SBT
3
5100
930
.18
1330
.26
SBR
1
1700
130
,08
410
.24
EBL
2
3400
420
.12
250
.07*
EBT
2
3400
1570
.46*
660
.19
EBR
1
1700
90
.05
130
.08
WBL
2
3400
110
.03*
140
.04
WBT
2
3400
580
.17
1330
.39*
WBR
1
1700
90
.05
80
.05
Clearance Interval
.05
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .76 ,87 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .76
2035
June 14 Multi -Use
Center Alt, (Const. Network)
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES
CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1
1700
50
,03
140
.08
NBT
3
5100
960
.19*
1490
.29*
NBR
1
1700
120
,07
150
.09
SBL
1
1700
70
.04*
120
.07*
SBT
3
5100
920
.18
1350
.26
SBR
1
1700
130
.08
410
.24
EBL
2
3400
430
.13
250
.07*
EBT
2
3400
1570
.46*
660
,19
EBR
1
1700
90
.05
130
.08
WBL
2
3400
110
,03*
140
,04
WBT
2
3400
580
.17
1330
.39*
WBR
1
1700
90
.05
80
.05
Clearance Interval
.05*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 77 ,87
.88
37