HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 - CC-12 - Annual Review of Current Housing Element - 9/6/2016CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 ITEM NUMBER: CC -12
SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE CURRENT HOUSING ELEMENT AND FINAL REVIEW OF
THE PREVIOUS GENERAL PLAN PURSUANT TO STATE LAW
DATE: AUGUST 22, 2016
FROM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION BY: GARY ARMSTRONG, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIRECTOR / DEPUTY CEO
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JUSTIN ARIOS, ASSISTANT PLANNER
(714) 754-5667, justin.arios@costamesaca.gov
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve 2015 Annual Report of the 2002 adopted Costa Mesa General Plan.
ONAI YSIS•
State Government Code Section 65400 requires that an annual report be made to the
legislative body on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation,
including activity towards its share of regional housing needs.
Pursuant to State law, the 2015 Annual Review of the Costa Mesa General Plan evaluates
and reports to the City Council and Planning Commission the progress in implementing
the previous General Plan. This will be the final review of the previous General Plan. The
Planning Commission received and recommended approval of the report at a regularly
scheduled meeting on August 8, 2016.
JUSTIN ARIOS
Assistant Planner
Attachment: 2015 Annual Report
GARY ARMSTRONG, AICP
Economic Development & Development
Services Director/ Deputy CEO
1259 Victoria Street
1036-1042 W. 18"'Street
ATTA rUMF.MT
2015 Annual Report
An Annual Review of the
Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan
>> enue
—2--
1259
-2-
u
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (131h Edition) Page 1
Table of Contents
Background........................................................................ Page 2
Analysis............................................................................. Page 2
Conclusion......................................................................... Page 4
Table 1 —Annual Review ...................................................... Page 5
Tables Al, and A2 — Annual Building Activity Report .................. Page 24
Table B — Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress ............ Page 25
Table C — Housing Program Status ........................................ Page 27
Table D — Approved & Completed Residential Units ................... Page 32
Appendix A — General Plan Goals, Objectives, Policies ............... Page 35
Appendix B — Housing Successor Annual Report ..................... Page 36
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
BACKGROUND
Page 2
On June 29, 1953, the City of Costa Mesa was incorporated as a general law city led by a City Council -
Manager form of government. The City of Costa Mesa originally consisted of an area of 3.5 square
miles and general population of 16,840. The City's current estimated population is 110,524 persons,
and it consists of an overall land area of 16.8 square miles.
The City adopted its first General Plan in 1957 and its second General Plan in 1970. The General Plan
was comprehensively amended in 1981 and again in 1992. Since the 1990 General Plan represented
several years of public input and community meetings, the City Council decided to update its technical
data and format for the creation of the 2000 General Plan.
On January 22, 2002, the City Council adopted the Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan. The 2000 General
Plan recognizes the community's diverse evolution of residential neighborhoods, its regional commercial
influence, and its recreational amenities. This is an annual report to Planning Commission and City
Council as required by state law on the updates of programs and policies of the General Plan.
The City has completed a comprehensive General Plan update that was approved on June 21, 2016.
The purpose of this study is to review the status in 2015 of the existing General Plan at that time, or the
2000 General Plan; even though the updated 2015-2035 General Plan is approved.
Following is a summary of the current status of various elements including the latest adopted Housing
Element in 2013 of the General Plan:
ANALYSIS
Government Code Section 65400
State Government Code Section 65400 requires that an annual report be made to the legislative body
on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation, including activity towards its
share of regional housing needs. This is the 13th annual review of the 2000 General Plan.
State Law requires the following:
Provide by April of each year an annual report to the City Council, the Office of Planning and
Research, and the Department of Housing and Community Development that includes all of the
following:
(A) The status of the plan and progress in its implementation.
(B) The progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs determined pursuant to
Section 65584 and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance,
improvement, and development of housing. The housing element portion of the annual
report shall include a section that describes the actions taken by the City of Costa Mesa
towards completion of the programs and status of the local government's compliance
with the deadlines in its housing element.
— L{
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 3
Annual Review and Housing Program Summary Report
Pursuant to State law, the 2015 Annual Review of the Costa Mesa General Plan reports to the City
Council the progress in implementing the General Plan. The 2015 Annual Review includes the
following elements:
1. Table 1 (Annual Review Summary) describes the status of the 2000 General Plan goals,
objectives, and policies and progress towards implementing the City's blueprint for land use
development in 2015.
2. Tables A, 8, and C (Housing Program Status Report) summarizes the City's progress in meeting
its share of regional housing needs, pursuant to State Government Code Section 65584 and local
efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development
of housing.
3. The conclusion describes the effectiveness of the 2000 General Plan.
2000 General Plan — Goals, Objectives, and Policies
The 2000 General Plan goals, objectives, and policies are described in a comprehensive document
(attached as Appendix A).
• A goal is defined as a broad vision of what the community wants to achieve or provide to
residents, landowners, business owners and tourists. It is a statement of a desired condition
based on community values. Goals are general in nature and usually timeless.
• A policy is a specific statement that guides decision-making. It indicates a commitment of the
City to a particular course of action. A policy is based on and helps implement a goal.
General Plan Update
The State Office of Planning and Research recommends that Cities update their General Plan every 10
years. City Council approved the City's 2015-2035 General Plan on June 21, 2016. The General Plan
update is an extensive process that involves various public meetings with City commissions and Council
and extensive community outreach. Due to the cost and extensive work involved with the update, the
task was originally focused on four major elements of the General Plan, planned for a two-year process
and budgeted in three fiscal years. In June of 2014, the City Council amended the contract with the
consultant to include economic analysis and a comprehensive update to all elements.
As part of this update, the City is also complying with the requirements of Assembly Bill 1358
(enacted in 2008), The California Complete Streets Act that requires integrating multimodal
transportation network policies into the circulation elements of the general plans. In addition, the
Housing Element was updated in January 2014 and compliance was received from the State
Department of Housing and Community Development for an eight-year Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (RHNA) cycle that ends in 2021.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
CONCLUSION
Page 4
The Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan continues to serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and
development, preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources, and efficient
expenditure of public funds.
As illustrated in Tables 1, A, B, and C, completed projects are in conformance with the General Plan's
goals, objectives, and policies for each respective element. Furthermore, significant progress on various
public works projects or private developments are also in accordance with the 2000 General Plan. The
City's legislative bodies have used the 2000 General Plan as the primary source of long-range planning
and policy direction. Future work activity that is consistent with these efforts will continue to guide
growth and preserve the quality of life within the community.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13r' Edition)
Costa Mesa Table 1 — Annual Review
Page 5
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
LAND USE ELEMENT
GOAL LU -1: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a balanced community of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, and institutional uses to satisfy the needs of the social and economic segments of the population and to retain the residential character of
the City; to meet the competing demands for alternative developments within each land use classification within reasonable land use intensity limits;
and to ensure the long term viability and productivity of the community's natural and man-made environments.
Objective LU -1 A: Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level no
greater than can be supported by the infrastructure.
LU -1A.1: Provide for the development of a mix and balance of
. A 36 -unit project (30 live -work and 6 residential) located at 2023, 2025, and
housing opportunities, commercial goods and services, and
2027 Placentia Avenue is under construction.
employment opportunities in consideration of the needs of the
. A 15 -unit and a 14 -unit live/work project (2075 and 2026 Placentia Avenue)
business and residential segments of the community.
are under construction.
• An 89 -unit live/work and loft project (1644 Whittier Ave.) is under
construction
LU -1A.2: Consider the effects of new employment, particularly in
City of Costa Mesa considers and addresses job/housing balance. To expand
relation to housing impacts, when new commercial or industrial
housing opportunities in areas near schools, jobs, child care, and
development is proposed.
transportation, the City adopted three Urban Plans in 2006 to encourage
mixed-use developments in three distinct areas.
Housing needs are addressed in the 2013-2021 Housing Element, which was
adopted on January 21, 2014.
LU -1A.3: Locate high-intensity developments or high -traffic
Traffic impacts are evaluated with each development project with
generating uses away from low-density residential in order to buffer
consideration to the City's circulation and any potential impacts to residential
the more sensitive land uses from the potentially adverse impacts of
neighborhoods.
the more intense development or uses.
LU -1A.4 Strongly encourage the development of low-density
Homeownership is encouraged with development of all residential projects,
residential uses and owner -occupied housing where feasible to
especially Small Lot Subdivisions and in particular in the West Side overlay
improve the balance between rental and ownership housing
districts.
opportunities.
LU -1A.5: Provide housing and employment opportunities within
The Urban Plan Overlays and the Planned Development Commercial zoning
tanned development areas to the extent feasible.
allow mixed use development.
LU -1A.6: Aggressively pursue methods to discourage the
Ongoing. Most projects in Urban Plan areas are proposed with lot
development of multiple units on long, narrow, single parcels.
consolidation. Lot consolidation is challenging for developers, but encouraged
Possible methods could include a lot combination zoning incentive or
for all new developments.
the creation of newer lower density zoning to be applied to lots with
M
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 6
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
less than a certain minimum frontage.
Objective LU -1 B: Ensure the long-term productivity and viability of the community's economic base.
LU -1 B.1: Permit adequate quantities and locations of commercial
Walgreens opened near the intersection of Superior Avenue and Newport
land to serve residential neighborhoods.
Boulevard, north of 17th Street (formerly Tower Record).
Objective LU -1 C Promote land use patterns and development which contribute to community and neighborhood identity.
LU -1 C.1: Permit the construction of buildings over two stories of 30
Commercial buildings over 30 feet are subject to Planning Commission
feet only when it can be shown that the construction of such
approval of a variance and considered on a case-by-case basis. There has
structures will not adversely impact surrounding developments and
been no variance and General Plan Amendment approval to increase the
deprive existing land uses of adequate light, air, privacy, and solar
height. Structures in urban overlay plans are typically over 30 feet and are
access.
evaluated with respect to privacy and shade and shadow impacts.
LU -1 C.2: Limit building height to four stories above grade south of the
There has been no variance or General Plan Amendment approval in 2015 to
1-405 Freeway, except for special purpose housing, such as elderly,
increase the maximum height of buildings over the allowable heights
affordable, or student housing. An exception is for the Newport Plaza
established by the General Plan south of the 1-405 Freeway.
property at 1901 Newport Boulevard where a five -level parking
structure is allowed.
LU -1 C.3: Prohibit construction of buildings which would present a
FAA is notified and reviews all mid -rise and high-rise development. The Draft
hazard to air navigation as determined by the FAA or independent
General Plan was found to be consistent with the John Wayne Airport
studies by qualified private consultants that have been certified by the
Environmental Land Use Plan at the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC)
FAA
meetin on May 19th, 2016.
LU -1C.4: Require building setbacks, structure orientation, and the
Ongoing and applicable to all second floor additions and remodels and new
placement of windows to consider the privacy of adjacent residential
three-story developments.
structures within the same project and on adjacent properties.
LU -1 C.5: Develop incentives for lot combination, or disincentives for
Ongoing. Developers are consistently encouraged to consolidate parcels for
development without lot combination. Consider policies such as
better site planning. Incentives include expedited review of planning
zoning designations which fall between zones, or development
applications.
standards which tie density to lot width as well as area.
LU -1 C.6: Provide assistance to neighborhoods with excessive noise
Ongoing. Any new development is subject to compliance with the noise
impacts, such as walls for sound attenuation, development of
standards and installation of sound walls to protect residential neighborhoods.
landscaped greenbelts, etc.
Objective LU -1 D: Ensure consideration of utility system capacities in land use planning and development processes.
LU -1 D.1: Include an evaluation of impacts on utility systems and
Will serve letters from utility companies are required for all projects that could
infrastructure in EIRs for all major general plan amendment, rezone,
potentially impact the service.
and development alications.
LU -1 D.2: Phase or restrict future development in the City to that
Will serve letters from utility companies are required for all projects that could
which can be accommodated by infrastructure at the time of
potentially impact the service.
completion of each phase of a multi -phased project.
Objective LU -1 E: Ensure correlation between buildout of the General Plan Land Use Plan Map and the Master Plan of Highways.
LU -1 E.1: Building densities/intensities for proposed new development a No General Plan Amendment exceeding the allowable Floor Area Ratio
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 7
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
projects shall not exceed the trip budget for applicable land use
(FAR) was approved in 2015.
classifications, as identified in the Land Use Element. Building
intensities for proposed new development projects shall not exceed
b) Any intensification of use or additions of floor area for non -conforming
the applicable floor area standards, except for the following
structures is subject to the zoning development standards and traffic
conditions:
generation rates.
a) Limited deviations from the graduated floor area ratio standards
depicted in Tables LU -4 and LU -8 for the commercial and
c) There has been no change to the policy.
industrial land use designations may be approved through a
discretionary review process. No deviation shall exceed 0.05
increase in the FAR in the moderate traffic category, and no
deviation shall be allowed in the very -low, low, and high traffic
categories. Deviations from the FAR standards shall not cause
the daily trip generation for the property to be exceeded when
compared to the existing daily trip generation to the site without
the proposed project or maximum allowable traffic generation for
the Moderate Traffic FAR category, whichever is greater.
b) Additions to existing non -conforming non-residential
developments may be allowed if the additions do not affect the
overall traffic generation characteristics of the development, and,
if the additions do not substantially affect the existing height and
bulk of the development. Additions to non-residential
developments shall be limited to those land uses with traffic
generation rates based on variable other than building area
square footage. Examples of such additions include, but are not
limited to: 1) Hotels/Motels: increases in the size of hotel rooms
or lobbies where no increase in the number of rooms is proposed;
2) Theaters: increases to "back -stage" support areas or lobbies
where no increase in the total number of seats is proposed.
c) In the above conditions, the new development shall be
compatible with surrounding land uses. Additional criteria for
approving deviations from the FAR standards may be established
by policyof the City Council.
LU -1 E.2: Development plans shall be required for all phased
Ongoing
development and approvals and shall be approved by the Planning
and Transportation Services Divisions prior to the issuance of
building permits.
LU -1 E.3: Development Plans shall include an overall buildout plan
Each project application is reviewed for any potential impacts on the
which can demonstrate the ability of the circulation system to support
circulation system. Projects with impacts are subject to either traffic
the proposed level of development.
improvement requirements and or traffic mitigation fees.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13' Edition) Page 8
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
LU -1 E.4: The City shall continue its annual preparation of the
The Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program (DPPMP)
Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program. The
Report will be prepared in March 2016.
annual review will specifically address major intersection operations
in any mixed-use overlay area.
Objective LU -1 F. Establish policies, standards, and procedures to minimize blighting influences and maintain the integrity of stable neighborhoods.
LU -1 F.1: Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods,
There have been no other development affecting stabilized residential
including mobile home parks (and manufactured housing parks) from
neighborhoods or mobile home parks. The City has taken additional action to
the encroachment of incompatible or potentially disruptive land uses
protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including (i) adoption of
and/or activities.
Vaping and Smoking Ordinance on September 15, 2015 to create regulations
for new smoking and vaping lounge establishments and amend Title 8,
Chapter 5 related to vaping in public facilities; (ii) adoption of a Multiple Family
Group Home Ordinance on November 17, 2015 to limit the number and
concentration of group homes and sober living facilities in the Multiple Family
Residential zones.
LU -1 F.2: Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or
Ongoing through the implementation and enforcement of Title 20 — Property
abandoned vehicles, outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal
Maintenance, of the Municipal Code. Title 20 establishes standards to ensure
buildings and establish regulations to abate weed -filled yards when
proper maintenance, removal of hazardous and improper storage, and
any of the above are deemed to constitute a health, safety, or fire
removal of weeds and other public nuisances.
hazard.
LU -1 F.3: Continue code enforcement as a high priority and provide
Ongoing
adequate funding and staffing to support code enforcement
programs.
LU -1 F.4: Ensure that residential densities can be supported with the
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects. All new development is subject to
infrastructure and that high-density residential areas are not
submittal of a will serve letter from the utility companies.
permitted in areas which cause incompatibility with existing single-
family areas.
LU -1 F.5: Provide opportunities for the development of well-planned
Ongoing. Development of mixed use projects are encouraged by planned
and designed projects which, through vertical or horizontal
development commercial and overlay zones.
integration, provide for the development of compatible residential,
commercial, industrial, institutional, or public uses within a single
project or neighborhood.
GOAL LU -2: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to establish development policies that will create and maintain an aesthetically pleasing and
functional environment and minimize impacts on existing physical and social resources.
Objective LU -2A. Encourage new development and redevelopment to improve and maintain the quality of the environment.
LU -2A.1: Use eminent domain in development project areas when
The Redevelopment Agency and its funding has been abolished in 2012.
necessary to effect lot combination and to ensure optimum size and
configuration of parcels experiencing development pressures.
LU -2A.2: Continue to implement, review, and update the
The Redevelopment Agency and its funding has been abolished in 2012.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 9
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
redevelopment plan for the adopted project area.
LU -2A.3: Prepare a specific plan to ensure that the portion of the
The Redevelopment Agency and its funding has been abolished in 2012.
Route 55 extension from 19th Street through the Redevelopment
Area is compatible with the Redevelopment Area and to review
development related issues on the remainder of the alignment.
LU -2A.4: In the event of damage or destruction, allow any legal
Ongoing. Chapter X of the Zoning Code establishes requirements for
conforming use in existence at the time of adoption of the General
nonconforming uses, developments and lots.
Plan that is located in a nonconforming development to be rebuilt to
its original building intensity, as long as any such rebuilding would not
increase the development's nonconformity, and the damage or
destruction was in no way brought about by intentional acts of any
owner of such use or property.
LU -2A.5: Develop standards, policies, and other methods to
Ongoing, the City adopted the Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance in 2014 to
encourage the grouping of individual parcels to eliminate obsolete
allow subdivisions of detached residential structures within the density and
subdivision patterns and to provide improved living environments
zoning requirements of multi -family residential districts.
while retaining the single-family zoning or single-family character of
such areas in the City.
LU -2A.6: Do not allow "rounding up" when calculating the number of
Consistently applied in review of development proposals. Densities in excess
permitted residential units except for lots existing as of March 15,
of General Plan are subject to approval of a General Plan Amendment.
1992, zoned R2 -MD that have less than 7,260 square feet in area,
and no less than 6,000 square feet, where density calculation
fractions of 1.65 or greater may be rounded up to two units.
LU -2A.7: Allow creation of parcels without street frontage if sufficient
All common roadway and access in common interest developments are
easements are provided for planned developments or common
subject to recordation of an easement.
interest developments.
LU -2A.8: Encourage increased private market investment in declining
Ongoing. The City Council adopted Small Lot Ordinance in March 2014 to
or deteriorating neighborhoods.
encourage fee simple lot subdivisions and reinvestment in older multiple family
zoned properties. Several projects approved on Westside has replaced
marginal industrial and commercial properties with new housing and live/work
developments.
LU -2A.9: Pursue maximum use of utility company funds and
Ongoing
resources in undergrounding existing overhead lines.
LU -2A.10: Ensure that appropriate watershed protection activities are
Ongoing. All development plans are required to submit the appropriate state
applied to all new development and significant redevelopment
required permits and water quality management plans per local ordinance.
projects that are subject to the NPDES Stormwater Permit, during the
project review, and permitting processes.
-planning,
LU -2A.11: Avoid conversion of areas particularly susceptible to
Ongoing. Erosion control plans are consistently required and reviewed prior to
erosion and sediment loss (e.g. steep slopes) and/or establish
grading permits.
development guidelines that identifies these areas and protects them
N
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 10
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
from erosion or sediment loss.
LU -2A.12: Preserve or restore areas that provide water quality
Ongoing
benefits and/or are necessary to maintain riparian and aquatic biota.
LU -2A.13: Promote site development that limits impact on and
Ongoing
protects the natural integrity of topography, drainage systems, and
water bodies.
LU -2A.14: Promote integration of stormwater quality protection into
Ongoing
construction and post -construction activities, as required by the
NPDES Stormwater Permit and the City's Local Implementation Plan.
GOAL LU -3: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to respond to the needs of its citizens for housing, public services, community facilities, and safety
of persons and property, to the extent possible within budgetary constraints, and when deemed appropriate for local government involvement.
Objective LU -3A: Ensure availability of adequate community facilities and provision of the highest level of public services possible, taking into
consideration budgetary constraints and effects on the surrounding area
LU -3A.1: Pursue annexation of certain areas within the City's Sphere
On December 15, 2014, a County island was officially annexed into the City's
of Influence to control development or uses which may be detrimental
jurisdiction. The annexation area contains 54 residential parcels on Colleen
to the City.
Place, Vista Baya, Santa Ana Avenue and 22nd Street in Eastside Costa Mesa.
Development was approved by Planning Commission on May 23, 2016.
LU -3A.2: Strongly encourage protection and preservation of existing,
Ongoing
but underutilized, school sites for future recreational, social, or
educational uses.
LU -3A.3: Establish a development impact fee program to fund
Fee study pending for August 2016.
additional fire and police personnel, facilities, and equipment to meet
the demands of additional growth in the City.
LU -3A.4: Require appropriate site and environmental analysis for
Currently there are six fire stations operating in the City. The City continues to
future fire and police station site locations or for the relocation or
monitor fire service needs as the population grows with new residential
closure of existing fire and police facilities.
development projects.
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
GOAL CIR-1: TRANSPORTATION- It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide for a balanced, uncongested, safe and energy-efficient
transportation system, incorporating all feasible modes of transportation.
Objective CIR-1A: To provide specific programs and policies that address multi -modal transportation, multi -agency coordination, mitigation of traffic
impacts and the balancing of land uses with transportation systems.
CIR-1A.1: Develop the Master Plan of Bikeways by pursuing all
Received Active Transportation Program (ATP) federal grant funding of $1.7
funding mechanisms and incorporating bikeways into roadway and
million for designing and constructing a bicycle trail from West 19th Street to
bridge widening projects. Incorporate bicycle facilities (circulation and
the Santa Ana River Trail system.
storage) into the design and development of all new commercial and
industrial projects and public facilities.
CIR-1A.2: Require dedication of right-of-way in an equitable manner
Ongoing
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13' Edition)
Page 11
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
for completion of adopted bikeway system as condition of
development of adjacent properties.
CIR-1A.3: Coordinate the design and improvement of pedestrian and
Initiated SCAG Active Transportation Study to review three corridors for
bicycle ways in major residential, shopping, and employment centers,
bicycle facility improvement.
parks, schools, and other public facilities, public transportation
Initiated update of Bicycle Master Plan as part of the General Plan Update.
facilities, and bicycle networks with adjacent cities.
Completed design phase for implementing electronic speed feedback signs at
21 locations throughout the City. Scheduled for construction in Summer 2016.
Also, bicycle education at 16 elementary schools is scheduled to be completed
in June 2016. Both these projects are funded through the Bicycle Corridor
Improvement Program grant.
CIR-1A.4: Include bicycle lanes on all new bridges along Master Plan
Ongoing
of Bikeway designated arterials within or adjacent to the City. In
cases where bridges are not located within the City, the City should
exert its influence on responsible agencies to include such bicycle
lanes. If provision of bicycle lanes is not feasible, measures should
be taken to prohibit bicycle riding on bridge walkways.
CIR-1A.5: Investigate all available operational measures, including
Improvements at Harbor Boulevard/Adams Avenue intersection —Widened
the use of one-way streets, to improve traffic circulation and minimize
intersection to provide third eastbound left -turn lane, second southbound right -
delay and congestion on arterials.
turn lane and extension of northbound left -turn lane.
Harbor Boulevard Widening from Law Court to Sunflower Avenue —
Completed widening of Harbor Boulevard from Law Court to Sunflower
Avenue to provide fourth northbound through lane.
Completed design of Harbor Boulevard/Gisler Avenue intersection
improvements and construction scheduled to begin in Summer 2016.
CIR-1A.6: Require dedication of right-of-way, in equitable manner, for
Ongoing
development that increases the intensity of land use.
CIR-1A.7: Implement citywide and/or areawide transportation system
Approved for Measure M eligibility, the City's Maintenance Effort for Fiscal
improvement programs on new development and fee programs for
Year 2014-2015 and the City's Seven -Year Capital Improvement Program for
new development.
Fiscal Year 2014-2015 to 2020-2021.
CIR-1A.8: Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and
Ongoing
housing into major development projects to reduce vehicle use.
CIR-1A.9: Encourage permitted General Plan land uses which
Ongoing
generate high traffic volumes to be located near major transportation
corridors and public transit facilities to minimize vehicle use,
congestion, and delay.
CIR-1A.10: Allow the application of transportation management
Ongoing
rideshare programs, integration of complementary land uses, and
other methods to reduce project related average daily and peak hour
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 12
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
vehicle trips in order to achieve consistency with allocated trip
budgets.
CIR-1A.11: Attempt to maintain or improve mobility within the City to
Annual review of level of service at all major intersections through
achieve a standard level of service not worse than Level of Service
Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program (DPPMP)
"D" at all intersections under the sole control of the City. Intersection
presented to Planning Commission and City Council.
level of service analyses for General Plan conditions shall be updated
periodically and presented to City Council.
CIR-1A.12: Cooperate with adjacent jurisdictions to maintain or
Included in the annual DPPMP review.
improve mobility within the City to achieve a standard level of service
no worse than "D" at all intersections under State or joint control.
Intersection level of service analyses for General Plan conditions for
locations under State or joint control shall be updated periodically and
resented to City Council.
CIR-1A.13: While the Gisler Road segment, west of Harbor, will
Ongoing
exceed its theoretical maximum capacity, the City shall work to
ensure that the future volume to capacity ratios do not exceed those
identified in Table CIR-3 of the General Plan.
CIR-1A.14: Reduce or eliminate intrusion of commuter through traffic
Design phase of this "Safe Routes to School" project to improve East 19th
on local streets in residential neighborhoods.
Street for access to Mariners Elementary School is close to completion.
Project includes installation of traffic calming devices along East 19th Street.
The construction phase is scheduled for Summer 2016.
CIR-1A.15: Prioritize intersection improvements which improve
Construction of replacement of an existing crosswalk with a new flashing
through traffic flow on major, primary, and secondary arterials, and
crosswalk on Placentia Avenue adjacent to 20th Street was completed in Fall
reduce impacts on local neighborhood streets with emphasis on
2015. Project also included decorative crosswalk and overhead warning
pedestrian safety.
indications.
CIR-1A.16: Maintain balance between land use and circulation
Ongoing
systems by phasing new development to levels that can be
accommodated by roadways existing or planned to exist at the time
of completion of each phase of the project.
CIR-1A.17: Work closely with the State of California and other
Ongoing
government agencies to control traffic -related impacts of uses on
State- or other agency -owned land (i.e. Orange County Fairgrounds,
Orange Coast College, etc.).
CIR-1A.18: Council shall review the results and findings of the
Removal of 19th Street Bridge over Santa Ana River will be considered as part
(SARX) study to delete the Gisler Avenue and 19th Street bridges
of General Plan Update.
over the Santa Ana River as needed. Upon completion of the study
and approval of the changes to the Orange County Transportation
Authority's (OCTA) Master Plan of Arterial Highways by the OCTA
board, the City shall process a General Plan Amendment to delete
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13t' Edition)
Page 13
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
the bridges from the City's Master Plan of Highways. All future
development applications submitted to the City shall be reviewed in
such a way that the 19th Street and Gisler Avenue bridges will not be
included as mitigation measures.
CIR-1A.19: Minimize circulation improvements that will necessitate
Ongoing
the taking of private property on existing developed properties.
CIR-1A.20: Encourage Orange County Transportation Authority to
This will be required in the new General Plan Update.
downgrade Mesa Verde Drive, Baker Street west of Harbor
Boulevard, and Gisler Avenue to a designation less than a Collector
Street in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways.
CIR-1A.21: Encourage Orange County Transportation Authority to
Completed
downgrade Arlington Avenue between Fairview Road and Newport
Boulevard to a Collector Street.
CIR-1A.22: Encourage Orange County Transportation Authority to
Redhill Avenue has been downgraded.
downgrade Baker Street between Redhill Avenue and Bristol Street,
and Redhill Avenue between 1-405 and Bristol Street to Primary
Arterial from current Major Arterial designation.
GOAL CIR-2:TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT- It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide for standard service levels at
signalized intersections by constructing capacity improvements for all various modes of circulation, adopting land use intensities commensurate with
planned circulation improvements and implementing traffic demand reduction programs, thereby creating a more energy efficient transportation
system.
Objective CIR-2A: To coordinate efforts with other regional agencies and pursue operational improvements towards enhancing the capacity of the
system of freeways and arterial highways in the City.
CIR-2A.1: Coordinate with Caltrans for future consideration of the
Project Study Report is now completed and approved by OCTA Board. Future
extension of Route 55 (the Costa Mesa Freeway) from 19th Street to
phase is not currently funded.
the southern City boundary.
CIR-2A.2: Coordinate with the Orange County Transportation
Traffic signal coordination efforts:
Authority and adjacent jurisdictions to improve signal timing and
. Traffic Signal upgrades and Synchronization Project is currently underway
coordination along major arterials.
along two corridors (Newport Boulevard, and Adams Avenue) — These
projects include upgrade and coordination of traffic signals on the two
Corridors.
• Received OCTA Measure M2 grant for traffic signal synchronization and
upgrade of signals along Bristol Street (joint project with Santa Ana and
Newport Beach), Harbor Boulevard (joint project with Santa Ana) and
Sunflower Avenue Corridors.
CIR-2A.3: Continue to work with Caltrans to synchronize and
Ongoing
coordinate traffic signals on arterials at intersections controlled by
Caltrans.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13"' Edition)
Page 14
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
CIR-2A.4: Continue to evaluate and pursue design and operational
Received Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) federal funding for
improvements (medians, driveway closures, signal synchronization or
design and construction of medians along Harbor Boulevard between Wilson
phasing, parking or turn restrictions, etc.) to improve the efficiency of
Street and 191h Street.
intersections.
Design underway for three median projects along Bristol Street, Placentia
Avenue and Red Hill Avenue.
Objective CIR-213: To promote the use of high occupancy vehicular modes of transportation in and through the City.
CIR-213.1: Coordinate with OCTA to construct bus turnouts at
Ongoing
appropriate locations with attractive shelters designed for safe and
comfortable use.
Objective CIR-2C: To invest capital via a rationally phased allocation process for implementing transportation projects and programs.
CIR-2C.1: Support efforts to design and construct an urban rail
Project suspended.
project as it extends through Costa Mesa.
CIR-2C.2: Complete and annually maintain a needs assessment for
Citywide Street Rehabilitations:
traffic service levels and traffic safety. Develop and annually update a
. Completed the rehabilitation of Bristol Street from Anton to the 405 Fwy
priority list of improvement projects, with priorities based on 1)
ramp.
correcting identified hazards; 2) improving/maintaining peak hour
. Completed Airport Area Rehabilitation.
traffic volumes; 3) improving efficiency of existing infrastructure
. Harbor Boulevard beautification completed.
utilization; and 4) intergovernmental coordination.
. Anton Blvd rehabilitation completed.
o Victoria Street rehabilitation completed.
• Sunflower Avenue rehabilitation completed.
Citywide Alley Improvements:
• Completed the rehabilitation of Alley no's 5,52, 119, 125, 120 and 121 -
Approved for Measure M eligibility, the City's Maintenance Effort for Fiscal
Year 2014-2015 and the City's Seven -Year Capital Improvement Program
for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 to 2020-2021.
Objective CIR-2D: To ensure that the transportation related impacts of development projects are mitigated to the fullest extent possible, in
conformance with transportation related policies.
CIR-2D.1: Circulation improvements required to provide or attain the
Ongoing
minimum traffic level of service standard at an intersection to which a
development project contributes measurable traffic shall be
completed within three years of issuance of the first building permit
for said project, unless additional right-of-way or coordination with
other government agencies is required to complete the improvement.
Improvements may be required sooner if, because of extraordinary
traffic generation characteristics of the project or extraordinary
impacts to the surrounding circulation system, such improvements
are necessary to prevent significant adverse impacts.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13"' Edition)
Page 15
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
CIR-2D.2: Construction of circulation improvements for phased
Ongoing
development projects may be constructed commensurate with the
project construction based upon the findings of the traffic study
approved by the City of Costa Mesa.
CIR-2D.3: A traffic impact fee shall be maintained for circulation
Ongoing
system improvements to the Master Plan of Highways within the
community and updated annually.
CIR-2D.4: Require discussion of transit service needs and site design
Ongoing
amenities for transit ridership in EIRs for all major projects.
CIR-2D.5: Require discussion of transportation system management
Ongoing
(TSM) and transportation demand management (TDM) measures in
all EIRs prepared for major projects.
OPEN SPACE/RECREATION ELEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a high quality environment through the development of recreation resources, and the
preservation of open space.
Objective OSR-1 A. Preserve the City's open space lands and provide additional community and neighborhood parkland in conjunction with future
population increases to provide adequate recreational opportunities and relief from the pressures of urban development.
OSR-1A.1: Provide a minimum of 5.76 acres of permanent public
This requirement is applied to all new development either through providing
open space (consisting of 4.26 acres of neighborhood and
open space or the park in lieu fees. Even in Urban Plan areas, where only 10
community parks and 1.5 acres in school yards) for every 1,000
percent open space is required for development of live/work units, the
residents.
developers have been providing more than the minimum requirements in
terms of square footage and on-site amenities.
OSR-1A.2: Provide maximum visibility and accessibility for future
Ongoing
public parks by locating such facilities adjacent to existing or planned
public streets.
OSR-1A.3: Encourage the acquisition of land for neighborhood or
Staff continues to seek opportunities to acquire land for active recreational
community arks for active recreational use.
use.
OSR-1A.4: To the extent legally possible, require other local,
The City works with all government agencies not only to maintain open space
regional, State, or Federal agencies to maintain an adequate
lands but to develop joint use agreements whenever feasible.
inventory of open sace lands within Costa Mesa.
OSR-1A.5: Encourage, through development rights transfers or other
Developers are encouraged to develop open space and recreation facilities or
incentives, the development of private permanent open space, and
to pay in -lieu fees to develop these facilities elsewhere in the City.
recreation facilities to meet the needs of the City's residents.
OSR-1A.6: Encourage, through open space easements, development
Ongoing as developments are submitted for approval
rights transfers or acquisition, zoning regulations, or other incentives,
the long-term maintenance of existing open space lands.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 16
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
OSR-1A.7: Require, through development standards and planned
Ongoing as developments are submitted for approval. Approved standards
development review criteria, the integration of open space uses
include the Streetscape and Median Development Standards.
(plazas, courtyards, landscaped areas, etc.) into major commercial
and industrial development or redevelopment projects.
OSR-1A.8: Continue to require, through development standards, the
Ongoing as developments are submitted for approval.
integration of open space and recreational uses and facilities into all
multiple -family residential projects.
OSR-1A.9: Review the possibility of incorporating an Arts in Public
The City's Cultural Arts Committee is working on incorporating public art
Places program in City parks.
throughout the City, to include City parks. The concept of an Arts & Culture
Master Plan is ongoing and would address this item if selected to move
forward.
OSR-1A.10: Strongly encourage improved maintenance of City and
The City actively participates in joint programs with the School District and
school district facilities used for recreation and organized sports
maintain an active Joint Use Agreement (JUA) as well as funding mechanism
activities. Strongly support recreation programs that benefit the youth
to aid with the added maintenance requirements.
of the community.
OSR-1A.11: Retain all existing open space in Lions Park.
The Library/NCC Project will include park enhancements at Lions Park.
OSR-1A.12: Preserve and enhance existing wetlands areas.
Successfully constructed 40 acres of wetlands and riparian habitat.
OSR-1A.11 Encourage the preservation of views of coastal
Ongoing
resources from City and County parkland and public streets within
Costa Mesa.
OSR-1A.14: Through continued implementation of the Parks,
The City successfully acquired 1.3 acres of land adjacent to Brentwood park
Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, actively pursue the
and incorporated it into a new master plan for the park.
acquisition and development of pocket and neighborhood parks
within park deficient areas.
OSR-1A.15: Update the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master
This is one of the goals for the Parks and Recreation Commission. The update
Plan on a regular basis.
of the City's General Plan is currently underway and includes updating the
Open Space and Recreation element. This update will set the general goals
based on the City's current needs and demands. Based on extensive public
outreach, demographic trends, and detailed analysis of all available data, a
Needs assessment will be completed and facility and program
recommendations will be incorporated into the new Master Plan. An update is
currently in process and is scheduled to be brought to Council before the end
of calendar year 2016.
OSR-1A.16: Ensure that parks and recreation facilities are developed
This goal is being implemented as park and open space projects are
with facilities appropriate to all ages, including athletic fields, active
developed. The play equipment for 2-5 year old children at Smallwood Park is
play areas, passive open space, tot lots, and picnic areas.
currently under construction. The remaining equipment has shelf -ready plans
and is awaiting funding for the designed elements.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 17
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
(See Urban Plan documents in Land Use Element section.)
(See Urban Plan documents in Land Use Element section.)
HOUSING ELEMENT
The City adopted 2013-2021 Housing Element on January 24, 2014, which has been certified by State Department of Housing and Community
Development.
HOU-1.1: Develop standards and/or guidelines for new development
Ongoing. This is a standard condition of approval for new multiple family
with emphasis on site (including minimum site security lighting) and
residential developments.
building design to minimize vulnerability to criminal activity.
HOU-1.2: Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods,
There have been no other development affecting stabilized residential
including but not limited to mobile home parks and manufactured
neighborhoods or mobile home parks. The City has taken additional action to
home parks, from the encroachment of incompatible or potentially
protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including (i) adoption of
disruptive land uses and/or activities.
Vaping and Smoking Ordinance on September 15, 2015 to create regulations
for new smoking and vaping lounge establishments and amend Title 8,
Chapter 5 related to vaping in public facilities; (ii) adoption of a Multiple Family
Group Home Ordinance on November 17, 2015 to limit the number and
concentration of group homes and sober living facilities in the Multiple Family
Residential zones.
HOU-1.3: Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or
Ongoing through the implementation and enforcement of Title 20 — Property
abandoned vehicles, outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal
Maintenance, of the Municipal Code. Title 20 establishes standards to ensure
buildings and establish regulations to abate weed -filled yards when
proper maintenance, removal of hazardous and improper storage, and
any of the above is deemed to constitute a health, safety or fire
removal of weeds and other public nuisances.
hazard.
HOU-2.1: Encourage concurrent applications (i.e., rezones, tentative
Ongoing. Applications for multiple family residential projects requiring multiple
tract maps, conditional use permits, variance requests, etc.) if
approvals are generally processed concurrently.
multiple approvals are required, and if consistent with applicable
processing requirements.
HOU-2.2: Promote the use of State density bonus provisions to
All units under density bonus agreements with the City are monitored on an
encourage the development of affordable housing for lower and
annual basis.
moderate income households, as well as senior housing.
HOU-2.5: Continue membership in the Orange County Housing
Ongoing
Authority to provide housing assistance to very low income
households.
HOU-2.6: Provide clear rules, policies, and procedures, for
The Zoning Code includes regulations that address reasonable
reasonable accommodation in order to promote equal access to
accommodation per State requirements. In March of 2013, the City adopted an
housing. Policies and procedures should be ministerial and include
Ordinance, in accordance with Senate Bill 2, to permit emergency shelters by
but not be limited to identifying who may request a reasonable
right in the Planned Development Industrial zone. The Ordinance also created
accommodation (i.e., persons with disabilities, family -members,
provisions for transitional housing and supportive housing that would allow
landlords, etc.), timeframes for decision-making, and provision for
these uses to be subject only to those restrictions that apply to other
c
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 18
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
relief from the various land -use, zoning, or building regulations that
residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone.
may constrain the housing for persons of disabilities.
HOU-3.1: Encourage the conversion of existing marginal or vacant
Ongoing. In 2006, the City adopted three Urban Plans to encourage the
commercial and/or industrial land to residential, where feasible and
conversion of existing marginal or vacant industrial land in the West Side to
consistent with environmental conditions that are suitable for new
mixed-use and residential developments.
residential development.
HOU-4.2: Continue to provide fair housing and counseling services
Ongoing (refer to Table C)
for all Costa Mesa residents in an effort to remove barriers and
promote access to affordable housing in the City.
HOU-4.3: Encourage programs that address the housing needs of
The 2013-2021 Housing Element was adopted by City Council on January 21,
senior citizens.
2014. The draft was certified by California Department of Housing and
Community Development on November 22, 2013 in meeting statuary
requirements. The Housing Element includes special programs for special
housin needs i.e., seniors, large families, etc.).
HOU-4.4: Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and
See above.
preservation of residential developments which will meet the needs of
families and individuals with specialized housing requirements.
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
GOAL CON -1 RESOURCE CONSERVATION: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a high quality environment through the
conservation of resources, including land, water, wildlife, and vegetation; the protection of areas of unique natural beauty; the integration of natural
features into the man-made environment.
Objective CON -1A: Evaluate the preservation of the City's existing biotic resources in as ecologically viable and natural a condition as possible, and,
where feasible, restore and integrate these resources into the urban environment.
CON -1 E.1: Participate in the Countywide Air Quality Technical
Ongoing
Assistance Program and the Orange County Council of Governments
Technical Advisory Committee.
CON -1A.1: Ensure that all future development will be adequately
Ongoing. Reviewed with each new development application.
reviewed with regard to possible adverse effects on plant and animal
Construction of the East 17th Street streetscape improvements has been
life and critical wildlife habitat and wetlands, and incorporate feasible
completed.
mitigation measures into the project design to reduce such effects.
CON -1A.2: Encourage sustainable landscapes through landscape
Ongoing. All new landscaping in excess of 2,500 SF is subject to Water
techniques that conserve, recycle, and reuse valuable resources,
Efficient Landscape Guidelines, adopted by City Council in March 1, 2016.
including the use of native vegetation and drought tolerant landscape
materials consistent with the City's landscaping standards set forth in
Chapter VII of Costa Mesa Zoning Code.
CON -1A.6: Support environmentally acceptable and sustainable
Ongoing. Encouraged to be provided or equipped for future installation for new
energy sources (especially renewable resources such as solar, wind,
developments.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13' Edition) Page 19
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
hydroelectric, and geothermal resources) for new development and
Permit processing for residential solar panels and electric vehicle chargers is
significant redevelopment projects.
expedited with the one stop plan check system. This program received a
Planning Commission Green Award in 2013.
CON -1 D.2: Preserve and enhance existing wetland areas.
Completed the restoration of approximately 40 acres of wetland and riparian
habitat in the northern portion of Fairview Park. Applied for grants for
additional preservation and enhancement of existing wetlands.
CON -1 E.3: Develop and implement a Reasonable Available Control
Traffic signal coordination efforts:
Measure Plan (including employee ridesharing, traffic signal
. Traffic Signal upgrades and Synchronization Project is currently underway
synchronization, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, energy conservation
along two corridors (Newport Boulevard, and Adams Avenue) — These
street lighting, modified work schedules, preferential carpool parking,
projects include upgrade and coordination of traffic signals on the two
or other equivalent control measures) in conformance with the Air
Corridors.
Quality Management Plan for the South Coast Air Basin.
. Received OCTA Measure M2 grant for traffic signal synchronization and
upgrade of signals along Bristol Street (joint project with Santa Ana and
Newport Beach), Harbor Boulevard (joint project with Santa Ana) and
Sunflower Avenue Corridors.
NOISE ELEMENT
GOAL N-1 NOISE HAZARDS AND CONDITIONS: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to protect its citizens and property from injury, damage, or
destruction from noise hazards and to work towards improved noise abatement.
Objective N-1 A: Control noise levels within the City for the protection of residential areas and other sensitive land uses from excessive and unhealthful
noise.
N -1A.1: Require, as a part of the environmental review process, that
Ongoing for all new projects.
full consideration be given to the existing and projected noise
environment.
N -1A.2: The maximum acceptable exterior noise levels for residential
Ongoing
areas is 65 CNEL.
N -1A.3: Give full consideration to the existing and projected noise
Ongoing
environment when considering alterations to the City's circulation
system and Master Plan of Highways.
N -1A.4: Encourage Caltrans to construct noise attenuation barriers
Ongoing
along State freeways and highways adjoining residential and other
noise sensitive areas.
N -1A.5: Ensure that appropriate site design measures are
Ongoing. Specific sounds attenuation for interior and exterior spaces is
incorporated into residential developments, when required by an
incorporated per requirements of the acoustical studies on project basis.
acoustical study, to obtain appropriate exterior and interior noise
levels. When necessary, require field testing at the time of project
completion to demonstrate compliance.
N -1A.6: Apply the standards contained in Title 24 of the California
Ongoing
N
N
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13"' Edition)
Page 20
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
Code of Regulations as applicable to the construction of all new
dwelling units.
N -1A.7: Discourage sensitive land uses from locating in the 65 CNEL
Ongoing
noise contour of the John Wayne Airport. Should it be deemed by the
City as appropriate and/or necessary for a sensitive land use to
locate in the 65 CNEL noise contour, ensure that appropriate interior
noise levels are met and that minimal outdoor activities are allowed.
N -1A.8: Support alternative methods for the reduction of noise
Ongoing
impacts at John Wayne Airport while continuing to maintain safety
and existing limitations on aircraft daily departures.
COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
GOAL CD -1 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS: Strengthen the image of the City as experienced from sidewalks and roadways.
Objective CD -1 A. Contribute to City beautification by enhancing the visual environment of Costa Mesa's vehicular and pedestrian corridor.
CD -1A.1: Implement the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median
New and consistent landscape palette was required for all new developments
Development Standards in all new streetscape corridor and parkway
along Harbor Blvd. south of the 405 Freeway.
projects. Coordinate with new development adjacent to applicable
public rights-of-way to integrate landscape features and design
Multiple City street rehabilitation projects have been completed, including the
elements consistent with the streetscape standards and
Harbor Boulevard beautification project and the Harbor Boulevard/Adams
recommendations.
Avenue intersection improvements.
CD -1A.3: Walls and fences should contribute to an attractive street
All new residential development projects are subject to a standard condition
and sidewalk environment and compliment the style and character of
that requires decorative walls along the perimeter of the development.
the local district and adjacent buildings. Newly constructed or
reconstructed walls and fences adjacent to sidewalks and roadways
should not run in a continuous plane, should incorporate architectural
treatments, such as masonry or wrought iron, and integrate tiered
plantings to soften their appearance.
CD -1A.4: Require a consistent landscape character along City streets
This condition is required for all new commercial development along Harbor
to reinforce the unique qualities of each corridor and district, including
Blvd. The city tree palette is implemented with all new projects.
the development of landscaped medians identified in Exhibit CD -5.
Support the implementation of the recommended street tree palette
for each City street, as identified in the City of Costa Mesa
Streetscape and Median Development Standards.
CD -1A.5: Electric and communication lines should be placed
All new development is required to underground all utilities to the greatest
underground, and electrical substations and telephone facilities
extent possible. No assessment district has been formed.
should be screened to minimize visual impacts from sidewalks,
streets, and adjacent properties. Support utility undergrounding
through conditions of project approval, preparation of undergrounding
ti
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13' Edition) Page 21
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
tans, and the formation of assessment districts.
CD -3.2: Reinforce a sense of arrival into the City by promoting
New and consistent landscape palette was required for all new development
architecturally significant development and significant landscape
along Harbor Blvd. and major corridors.
plantings at key nodes. Undertake a visioning process to develop
specific design guidelines that articulate the desired character for
each key node within Costa Mesa.
CD -7A.1: Ensure that new and remodeled structures are designed in
Ongoing
architectural styles which reflect the City's diversity, yet are
compatible in scale and character with existing buildings and the
natural surroundings within residential neighborhoods. Develop and
adopt design guidelines for residential development.
SAFETY ELEMENT
GOAL SAF -1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND MANMADE HAZARD PROTECTION: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to protect its citizens and property
from injury, damage, or destruction from environmental hazards, including hydrologic, geologic, and climatic episodes, as well as from man-made
hazards, including hazardous materials.
Objective SAF -1 A: Work towards the mitigation or prevention of potential adverse consequences of natural disasters.
SAF -1A.1: Consider geologic hazard constraints, impacts, and
Ongoing
mitigation when developing land use policies and when making public
decisions relating to land development.
SAF -1A.2: Enforce standards, review criteria, and other methods to
Ongoing. Reviewed in detail for each project with the geotechnical report.
ensure that structures on or adjacent to bluffs are set back sufficiently
to preserve the natural contour and aesthetic value of the bluff line
and to provide sufficient access for fire protection.
SAF -1A.3: Require geologic surveys of all new development located
Ongoing. Reviewed in detail for each project with the geotechnical report.
on or adjacent to bluffs.
SAF -1A.4: Cooperate with local, State, and Federal flood control
Ongoing per State guidelines
agencies to reduce the potential for flood damage in the City of Costa
Mesa.
SAF -1A.5: Identify and publicize the extent of geologic and seismic
No additional public information has been provided. Seismic standards are
hazards within Costa Mesa and advise affected residents and
reviewed with building permit applications.
property owners of appropriate protection measures. Offer
information regarding earthquake standards to reduce or eliminate
structural damage.
SAF -1A.6: Encourage, through technical assistance or development
There have been no development incentives regarding seismic hazards in
incentives, private property owners to take adequate steps to protect
2012.
their property against seismic hazards.
SAF -1A.7: Require all proposed development projects to be designed
All grading permits are reviewed in accordance with requirements for on-site
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 22
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
to minimize both the volume and velocity of surface runoff and permit
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and State requirements for run off
no adverse downstream impacts due to increased runoff through the
and obtaining a SWPPP permit.
proper design of subsurface drains, appropriate grading, on-site
retention basins, landscape programs, or other appropriate
measures.
SAF -1A.8: Publicize the extent of flood hazards within Costa Mesa
With the latest improvements in the flood channels reflected in the 2009 Flood
and advise affected residents and property owners of appropriate
maps, there are no residential properties within flood hazard areas.
protection measures. Develop an education program, such as the
Flood Awareness Program, and emergency disaster plans for
flooding.
SAF -1A.9: Encourage County, State, and Federal agencies to
Completed.
complete flood control improvements to the Greenville -Banning
Channel to protect Costa Mesa residents and property located in the
1 00 - ear flood zone from a potential major disaster.
Objective SAF -1 B: Participate in the safe, efficient and responsible management of hazardous waste materials.
SAF -1 B.1: Participate with the County of Orange in the
Ongoing
implementation of the Orange County Hazardous Waste
Management Plan.
SAF -1 B.2: Ensure that appropriate in-depth environmental analyses
Ongoing with all related projects.
are conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials
treatment, transfer, and/or disposal facility.
SAF -1 B.3: Continue to work with the County of Orange to identify and
Ongoing
inventory all users of hazardous s materials and all hazardous waste
generators and prepare clean-up action plans for identified disposal
sites.
SAF -1 AA: Code amendment for an update to the City's floodway and
Last amendment adopted in 2009.
floodplain ordinance consistent with the federal and state
requirements.
HISTORIC/CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
Goal HCRA HISTORIC RESOURCE CONSERVATION: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a high quality environment
through the protection and conservation of historic and cultural resources.
Objective HCRA A Encourage the preservation and protection of the City's natural and man-made historic resources.
HCRAA.1: Require, as part of the environmental review procedure,
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
an evaluation of the significance of paleontological, archaeological,
extensive grading.
and historical resources and the impact of proposed development on
those resources.
HCR -1A.2: Require monitoring of grading operations by a qualified
Ongoing Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 23
General Plan Goal, Objective or Policy
Description of City Action
paleontologist or archaeologist when the site is reasonably suspected
extensive grading.
of containing such resources. If, as a result, evidence of resources is
found, require the property to be made available for a reasonable
period of time for salvage of known paleontological and
archaeological resources by qualified experts, organizations, or
educational institutions.
HCR -1A.3: Require development on land containing known
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
archaeological resources to use reasonable care to locate structures,
extensive grading.
paving, landscaping, and fill dirt in such a way as to preserve these
resources undamaged for future generations when it is the
recommendation of a qualified archaeologist that said resources be
preserved in situ.
HCR -1A.4: Encourage the preservation of significant historic
In 2011 a Historic Reserve account was created related to preservation of
resources as identified on Table HCR -1 by developing and
Home Ranch historic structures and as a requirement of the Development
implementing incentives such as building and planning application
Agreement. The Historic Reserve Account is intended to be utilized for
permit fee waivers, Mills Act contracts, grants and loans,
purposes of providing financial support for the costs of maintaining, operating,
implementing the State Historic Building Code and other incentives
and preserving the Historic Structures and Site.
as identified in the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance.
Per requirements of Home Ranch Development Agreement, the developer has
been hosting open house events at the Home Ranch site on annual basis.
HCR -1A.5: Promote the preservation of significant historical
See above
resources and encourage other public agencies or private
organizations to assist in the purchase and/or relocation of sites,
buildings, and structures deemed to be of historical significance.
HCR -1A.6: Encourage development of an interpretive center for
The Fairview Park Master Plan was last updated in November 2008. The
paleontological, archaeological, and historical resources at Fairview
Master Plan includes an area south of the rail station, east of Placentia
Park. The center may contain resources found in the park area as
Avenue, which is being retained for a potential museum site. The site could
well as resources found throughout the City.
house the Costa Mesa Historical Society, including archaeological and
historical resources at the Fairview Park site. Staff continues to search for
funding sources for the implementation of elements of the Fairview Park
Master Plan, including the potential museum site.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Costa Mesa
Page 24
Table Al - Annual Building Activity Report
Table A2 - Annual Building Activity
Above Moderate -Income Units
Single
Housing
5+ Units
Housing with
without
Total
Financial
Financial
Housing Development Information
Assist. and/or
Assist. or
Homes
Deed
Deed
55
Restrictions
Restriction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Affordability by Household Incomes
Project
Unit
Tenure
Very -Low
Low
Moderate
Above
Total
Assist.
Deed
Category
R=Renter
Moderate
Units
Restrict
O=Owner
ions
Attached
O
9
9
SFD
O
46
46
Multi-
O
38
38
Family
Subtotal
93
93
(9) Total of Above Moderate from Table A2 > > >
(10) Total by income units
93
93
(Field 5) Table A
Table A2 - Annual Building Activity
Above Moderate -Income Units
—20�
Single
2-4
5+ Units
Second
Mobile
Total
Family
Units
Unit
Homes
No. of Units Permitted
55
38
93
for Above Moderate
—20�
Annual Review of Costa Nlesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Costa Mesa
Page 25
Table B — Regional Housing Needs
Allocation Progress
-7—
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 26
Costa Mesa
Table B — Regional Housing Needs
Allocation Progress
Enter Calendar Year starting with the first
year of the RHNA allocation period. See
2013
2014'
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Example.
Total Units
Total
Remaining
RHNA
to Date
RHNA
Allocation
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
(all years)
by Income Level
Income Level
by
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Income
Level
Deed
Restricted
1
Very Low
1
Non -deed
restricted
Deed
Restricted
1
Low
1
Non -deed
restricted
Deed
Restricted
0
Moderate
0
Non -deed
restricted
Above Moderate
0
22
50
93
165
0
Total RHNA by COG.
2
Enter allocation number:
165
Total Units ► ► ►
22
50
93
2
Remaining Need for RHNA Period ► ► ► No. ►
*New RHNA cycle began in 2014.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13t' Edition)
Costa Mesa
Table C - Housing Program Status
- 2(A—
Page 27
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 28
Costa Mesa
City of Costa Mesa
Table C1 - Housing Program Status
(January 2015 - December 2015) (HCD)
:3Q —
ProgramHousing
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Ongoing through the Planning Division, in order to protect
residential uses from incompatibility.
PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT
Ongoing through various divisions and departments.
HOUSING REHABILITATION
Ongoing assistance through the Housing and Community
Development Division for owner -occupied units. Also the
Housing and Community Development Division provides
assistance with the purchase and rehabilitation of rental units by
non-profit organizations to operate as affordable to low and
very -low income tenants. None were funded during FY 14-15.
During FY 14-15 rehabilitation of 1 owner -occupied unit was
completed.
MOBILE HOME PARK
Ongoing. The City completed 21 mobile home rehabilitation
PRESERVATION
projects during FY 14-15. The Zoning Code requires Planning
Commission approval to convert to another land use.
INCENTIVES FOR AFFORDABLE
Implementing ordinance in effect, 190 density bonus units
HOUSING
currently exist in the City as a result of this ordinance.
MANUFACTURED HOUSINGStandards
incorporated into zoning code, offer development
review streamlining through staff level processing; adopted May
1998.
SECOND UNITS
The second -unit provisions in the Zoning Code were amended
to ensure consistency with State Law requirements in 2011.
ACCESSORY APARTMENTS
In 2015, one accessory apartment was approved at 456 Abbie
Way.
FEDERAL/STATE HOUSING
Ongoing 48 single- and multiple -family units constructed over
PROGRAMS
the last several years through a combination of public/private
partnerships. No new units were constructed in the past year.
HOUSING ASSISTANCE
Ongoing rental assistance voucher program (formerly Section 8)
assistance through OCHA, during FY 14-15.
SHARED HOUSING
No programs are offered by the City, Senior Center, or County.
:3Q —
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 29
ZONING ORDINANCE REVIEW
Ongoing. See Mixed -Use Developments.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR FIRST-TIME
Small lot common interest development standards have been
HOMEBUYERS (FTHB)
adopted since 2001 to promote development for first time home
buyers.* The City also adopted Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance
in 2014 to further promote homeownership and development of
fee simple lots.
LAND ACQUISITIONS
No land acquisitions occurred in 2015.
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS
A Mixed -Use Overlay District has been approved for the Bristol
Street corridor area and Westside Costa Mesa. This overlay
district, in conjunction with Urban Plan documents, will allow
mixed-use development opportunities, and potentially 4,226
additional units by the year 2025.
HOUSING SUPPLY IMPACT
Ongoing
ASSESSMENT
REZONE REVIEW
None
DEVELOPMENT MONITORING
Ongoing activity.
PROGRAM
CDBG FUNDING FOR HOMELESS
During FY 14-15, 7 individuals were provided homelessness
SHELTER
prevention services (i.e., rental assistance to prevent eviction or
deposit assistance to move into housing and rapid housing),
plus 23 individuals were provided transitional housing
assistance and services.
ADEQUATE SITES
. With the termination of the City's Redevelopment Agency
based on Supreme Court opinion relative to AB1X26 and
AB1 X27 effective February 1, 2012, the future of affordable
housing project sites and financing is being determined.
• A total of 113 new and replaced housing units were
completed construction in 2015. **
SINGLE -ROOM OCCUPANCY AND
Ongoing. Policy was adopted in 1991; three projects are
FAMILY -ROOM OCCUPANCY
completed and occupied for a total of 247 units; including a 91
HOTELS
senior units and 11 SRO units.
FAIR HOUSING ASSISTANCE
The City is a member of a region -wide effort to ensure equal
access to housing. Generally, activities have included
investigation, resolution and education. During FY 14-15, 331
Costa Mesa households were assisted with fair housing issues.
INCENTIVES FOR AFFORDABLE
Accessibility is now required through ADA standards.
SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
A 50 percent density increase for construction of very -low
income senior housing is provided in the Density Bonus
Program.
COMMON INTEREST
In 2015, 182 units of common interest developments and small
DEVELOPMENTS/SMALL LOT
lot subdivisions were approved, under construction or
SUBDIVISIONS
completed.
CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS
No apartment conversions were approved in 2015.
PRESERVATION OF AT -RISK
No new activity.
HOUSING
Annual Review of Costa Nlesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 30
--32
IMM, Vim
UTeME MW'
DENSITY BONUS COMPLIANCE
Annual review conducted to ensure compliance; 190 affordable
MONITORING
units in compliance with the density bonus program exist in the
City. As of 2015, all of the 27 properties participating in the
Density Bonus Program are in compliance with the program's
requirements in terms of maximum affordable rental rates. A
separate report will be provided on the status of the Density
Bonus units to the Planning Commission and City Council in late
August, 2016.
--32
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Costa Mesa
City of Costa Mesa
Table C2 - Housing Program Status
(January 2015 — December 2015)
Page 31
*Master plan screening for 343 additional live/work and residential units was approved in 2015.
The development plans are in process.
33—
Affordability by Household Incomes
Very Low- Moderate- Above
Housing Element Programs
Total Units
Low- Income Income Moderate -
Income Income
HOUSING REHABILITATION-
0
1
0
0
1
OWNER
HOUSING REHABILITATION-
0
0
0
0
0
RENTER
MOBILE HOME REHABILITATION
21
0
0
0
21
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
0
0
0
0
0
CONSTRUCTION
GRANNY FLATS AND ACCESSORY
0
0
0
1
1
APARTMENTS CONSTRUCTION
FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER
0
0
0
0
0
(this program is no longer available)
NEW SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY
0
0
0
0
0
HOTEL ROOMS
PRESERVE AT -RISK UNITS
0
0
0
0
0
CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS
N/A
0
APPROVED
SOBECA
URBAN PLANS
Mesa West
108
108
MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENTS
Bluffs
APPROVED*
Residential
235
235
Owenrship
REZONE REVIEW
0
*Master plan screening for 343 additional live/work and residential units was approved in 2015.
The development plans are in process.
33—
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (0' Edition)
Costa Mesa
Table D —
Approved & Completed Residential Units
—34—
Page 32
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 33
The following is a list of residential units approved in 2015 and units completed and under
construction approved in previous years.
No. of Units
APPROVED-•
Building Type
Address
177 Units
42 Detached live/work, 89 attached
live/work, 46 residential lofts
671 W. 17th St.
100 Units
Condos
3350 Avenue of the Arts
10 Units
Detached
522 & 526 Bernard St.
10 Units
Detached
531 Bernard St.
2 Units
Detached
217 Cabrillo St.
2 Units
Detached
119 Cecil Place
2 Units
Detached
2967 Ceylon Dr.
5 Units
Detached
2333 Elden Ave.
28 Units
Detached, including 7 live/work
2095 Harbor Blvd.
224 Units
Apartments
2277 Harbor Blvd.
33 Units
Detached
2626 Harbor Blvd.
4 Units
Detached
2068 Maple Ave.
5 Units
Detached
261 Mesa Dr.
3 Units
Detached 1817 Viola Place
APPROVED-•JECTS - UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Building Type Address
No. of Units
4 Units
Detached duplex (2 duplexes)
2136 Thurin St.
2 Units
Detached
334 E. 16th St.
2 Units
Detached
162 E. 18th St.
24 Units
Detached condos
650 Hamilton St.
2 Units
Detached
1620 Orange Ave.
6 Units
Detached
2366 Orange Ave.
2 Units
Detached
189 Merrill Place
2 Units
Detached
355 Rochester St.
2 Units
Detached
215 Knox Place
2 Units
Detached
288 E 15th St.
28 Units
Detached
1239 Victoria St.
250 Units
Attached/Apartments
580 Anton Blvd.
13 Units
Detached
2880 Mesa Verde Dr. E.
32 Units
Detached live/work
1672 Placentia Ave.
2 Units
Detached
320 E. 18th St.
2 Units
Detached
1944 Church St.
5 Units
Detached
2661 Orange Ave.
18 Units
30 Attached live/work; 6 residential
2023, 2025 & 2027 Placentia Ave.
14 Units
Detached live/work
2075 Placentia Ave.
37 Units
Detached condos
573-591 Victoria St.
89 Units
Detached; 40 live/work, 49 residential
1620-1644 Whittier Ave.
9 Units
Attached
2013-2029 Anaheim Ave.
4 Units
Detached
2160 & 2172 Myran Dr.
,3S'--
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13"' Edition) Page 34
6 Units
Detached
2183, 2187, & 2191 Miner St.
5 Units
Detached
1974 Meyer Place
14 Units
Attached condos
2460 Newport Blvd.
13 Units
Detached condos
789 & 795 Paularino Ave.
15 Units
Detached live/work
2026 Placentia Ave.
2 Units
Detached
2525 Santa Ana Ave.
31 Units
Attached live/work
1677 & 1695 Superior Ave.
4 Units
Detached
1631-1645 Tustin Ave.
4 Units
Detached
687 Victoria St.
7 Units
Detached
1259 Victoria St.
240 Units
Apartments
125 E. Baker St.
No. of Units
4 Unit
2 Units
17 Units
6 Units
2 Units
5 Units
18 Units
2 Units
6 Units
2 Units
6 Units
18 Units
7 Units
8 Units
10 Units
Building Type
Detached
Attached
Attached
Detached
Detached
Detached
30 Attached live/work; 6 residential
Detached
Detached condos
Detached
Detached
Attached live/work
Detached
Detached
Detached
Address
743 W. 20th St.
456 Abbie Way
2013-2029 Anaheim Ave.
2070 Maple Ave.
2590 Orange Ave.
2294 Pacific Ave.
2023, 2025 & 2027 Placentia Ave.
270 Palmer St.
789 & 795 Paularino Ave.
389 Rochester St.
2525 Santa Ana Ave.
1677 & 1695 Superior Ave.
1631-1645 Tustin Ave.
687 Victoria St.
1259 Victoria St.
TOTAL UNITS APPROVED: 605 UNITS
TOTAL UNITS UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 890 UNITS
TOTAL UNITS COMPLETED: 113 UNITS (includes attached units, common interest, small lot
and detached single family)
_ -3 C--
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Costa Mesa
Appendix A
2000 General Plan
Goals, Objectives, Policies
3-7
Page 35
2000 Costa Mesa General Plan
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
- 2015 Annual Review -
36--
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
2000 GENERAL PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES
PAGE 2
Each element of the General Plan contains goals and policies based upon the needs
and desires of the community, as derived from the previously adopted 1990 General
Plan, background research, planning staff, and members of the City Council.
A goal is defined as a broad vision of what the community wants to achieve or
provide to residents, landowners, business owners and tourists. It is a statement of a
desired condition based on community values. Goals are general in nature and
usually timeless. A policy is a specific statement that guides decision-making. It
indicates a commitment of the City to a particular course of action. A policy is based
on and helps implement a goal.
As stated previously in Section 3.3, one of the objectives for the 2000 General Plan
and General Plan EIR was to review the 1990 General Plan goals, objectives, and
policies for relevancy, completion and applicability for the long-term development in
the City. City staff reviewed the goals, objectives, and policies in the 1990 General
Plan and determined if the goals, objectives, and policies had been completed, and if
not, determined their relevancy and applicability for the 2000 General Plan. The
following are the goals and associated objectives and policies that have been set for
the Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan.
At the conclusion of each goal, objective or policy is a statement within [brackets] that
indicates one of four possible scenarios: 1) the goal, objective, or policy remains the
same as the 1990 General Plan, 2) the goal, objective or policy has been modified
from the 1990 General Plan statement for the 2000 General Plan, 3) the goal,
objective or policy is a new statement for the 2000 General Plan, or 4) in the case of
the Housing Element, no changes were made to the goals, objectives or policies.
Examples of the wording for the three aforementioned scenarios are as follows:
1) [1990 GP Goal VII],
2) [1990 GP Policy 237 — Modified for 2000 GP],
3) [New Objective for 2000 GP], and
4) [No Change].
3q-
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
LAND USE ELEMENT
PAGE 3
The goals, objectives, and policies that address land use are as follows:
GOAL LU -1:
LAND USE
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a balanced
community of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and institutional uses to
satisfy the needs of the social and economic segments of the population and to retain
the residential character of the City; to meet the competing demands for alternative
developments within each land use classification within reasonable land use intensity
limits; and, to ensure the long term viability and productivity of the community's
natural and man-made environments. [1990 GP Goal VII]
Objective LU -1A. Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the
community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level no greater than
can be supported by the infrastructure. [1990 GP Objective VII -A]
LU -1A.1 Provide for the development of a mix and balance of housing
opportunities, commercial goods and services, and employment
opportunities in consideration of the needs of the business and
residential segments of the community. [1990 GP Policy 224]
LU -1A.2 Consider the effects of new employment, particularly in relation to
housing impacts, when new commercial or industrial development is
proposed. [1990 GP Policy 225]
LU -1A.3 Locate high-intensity developments or high traffic generating uses
away from low-density residential in order to buffer the more
sensitive land uses from the potentially adverse impacts of the more
intense development or uses. [1990 GP Policy 226]
LU -1A.4 Strongly encourage the development of low-density residential uses
and owner -occupied housing where feasible to improve the balance
between rental and ownership housing opportunities. [1990 GP
Policy 227 — Modified for 2000 GP]
LU -1A.5 Provide housing and employment opportunities within planned
development areas to the extent feasible. [1990 GP Policy 229 —
Modified for 2000 GP]
LU -1A.6 Aggressively pursue methods to discourage the development of
multiple units on long, narrow, single parcels. Possible methods
could include a lot combination zoning incentive or the creation of
new lower density zoning to be applied to lots with less than a certain
minimum frontage. [1990 GP Policy 231]
Objective LU -113. Ensure the long term productivity and viability of the community's
economic base. [1990 GP Objective VII -B]
LU -1 B.1 Permit adequate quantities and locations of commercial land to serve
residential neighborhoods. [1990 GP Policy 234]
Objective LU -1C. Promote land use patterns and development which contribute to
community and neighborhood identity. [1990 GP Objective VII -C]
4c.-
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 4
LU -1 C.1 Permit the construction of buildings over two stories or 30 feet only
when it can be shown that the construction of such structures will not
adversely impact surrounding developments and deprive existing
land uses of adequate light, air, privacy, and solar access. [1990 GP
Policy 236]
LU -1C.2 Limit building height to four stories above grade south of the 1-405
Freeway, except for special purpose housing, such as elderly,
affordable, or student housing. An exception is for 1901 Newport
Boulevard where a five -level parking structure is allowed. [1990 GP
Policy 237 — Modified for 2000 GP]
LU -1C.3 Prohibit construction of buildings which would present a hazard to air
navigation as determined by the FAA or independent studies by
qualified private consultants that have been certified by the FAA.
[1990 GP Policy 2381
LU -1C.4 Require building setbacks, structure orientation, and the placement
of windows to consider the privacy of adjacent residential structures
within the same project and on adjacent properties. [1990 GP Policy
240]
LU -1C.5 Develop incentives for lot combination, or disincentives for
development without lot combination. Consider policies such as
zoning designations which fall between zones, or development
standards which tie density to lot width as well as area. [1990 GP
Policy 243]
LU -1 C.6 Provide assistance to neighborhoods with excessive noise impacts,
such as walls for sound attenuation, development of landscaped
greenbelts, etc. [1990 GP Policy 250]
Objective LU -111). Ensure consideration of utility system capacities in land use
planning and development processes. [1990 GP Objective VII -D]
LU -1 D.1 Include an evaluation of impacts on utility systems and infrastructure
in EIRs for all major general plan amendment, rezone, and
development applications. [1990 GP Policy 251]
LU -1 D.2 Phase or restrict future development in the City to that which can be
accommodated by infrastructure at the time of completion of each
phase of a multi -phased project. [1990 GP Policy 252 — Modified for
2000 GP]
Objective LU -1E. Ensure correlation between buildout of the General Plan Land
Use Plan Map and the Master Plan of Highways. [1990 GP Objective VII -E]
LU -1E.1 Building densities/intensities for proposed new development projects
shall not exceed the trip budget for applicable land use
classifications, as identified in the Land Use Element. Building
intensities for proposed new development projects shall not exceed
the applicable floor area standards, except for the following
conditions:
(a) Limited deviations from the graduated floor area ratio
standards depicted in Tables LU -4 and LU -8 for the
commercial and industrial land use designations may be
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 5
approved through a discretionary review process. No deviation
shall exceed a 0.05 increase in the FAR in the moderate traffic
category, and no deviation shall be allowed in the very -low,
low, and high traffic categories. Deviations from the FAR
standards shall not cause the daily trip generation for the
property to be exceeded when compared to the existing daily
trip generation for the site without the proposed project or
maximum allowable traffic generation for the Moderate Traffic
FAR category, whichever is greater.
(b) Additions to existing nonconforming non-residential
developments may be allowed if the additions do not affect the
overall traffic generation characteristics of the development,
and, if the additions do not substantially affect the existing
height and bulk of the development. Additions to non-
residential developments shall be limited to those land uses
with traffic generation rates based on variables other than
building area square footage. Examples of such additions
include, but are not limited to: 1) Hotels/Motels: increases in
the size of hotel rooms or lobbies where no increase in the
total number of rooms is proposed; 2) Theaters: increases to
"back -stage" support areas or lobbies where no increase in the
total number of seats is proposed.
(c) In the above conditions, the new development shall be
compatible with surrounding land uses. Additional criteria for
approving deviations from the FAR standards may be
established by policy of the City Council. [1990 GP Policy 255
— Modified for 2000 GP]
LU -11E.2 Development Plans shall be required for all phased development and
approvals and shall be approved by the Planning and Transportation
Services Divisions prior to the issuance of building permits. [1990
GP Policy 316]
LU -1 E.3 Development Plans shall include an overall buildout plan which can
demonstrate the ability of the circulation system to support the
proposed level of development. [1990 GP Policy 317]
LU -1 E.4 The City shall continue its annual preparation of the Development
Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program. [1990 GP Policy
318]
Obiective LU -11F. Establish policies, standards, and procedures to minimize
blighting influences and maintain the integrity of stable neighborhoods. [1990 GP
Objective VIII -A]
LU -1 F.1 Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including
mobile home parks (and manufactured housing parks) from the
encroachment of incompatible or potentially disruptive land uses
and/or activities. [1990 GP Policy 260]
LU -1 F.2 Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or abandoned
vehicles, outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal buildings and
establish regulations to abate weed -filled yards when any of the
above are deemed to constitute a health, safety, or fire hazard.
[1990 GP Policy 261]
2-^
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 6
LU -1 F.3 Continue code enforcement as a high priority and provide adequate
funding and staffing to support code enforcement programs. [1990
GP Policy 262 — Modified for 2000 GP]
LU -1 F.4 Ensure that residential densities can be supported by the
infrastructure and that high-density residential areas are not
permitted in areas which cause incompatibility with existing single-
family areas. [1990 GP Policy 284]
LU -1F.5 Provide opportunities for the development of well planned and
designed projects which, through vertical or horizontal integration,
provide for the development of compatible residential, commercial,
industrial, institutional, or public uses within a single project or
neighborhood. [1990 GP Policy 286]
GOAL LU -2:
DEVELOPMENT
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to establish development policies that will
create and maintain an aesthetically pleasing and functional environment and
minimize impacts on existing physical and social resources. [1990 GP Goal III]
Objective LU -2A. Encourage new development and redevelopment to improve and
maintain the quality of the environment. [1990 GP Objective III -A]
LU -2A.1 Use eminent domain in redevelopment project areas when
necessary to effect lot combination and to ensure optimum size and
configuration of parcels experiencing development pressures. [1990
GP Policy 111]
LU -2A.2 Continue to implement, review, and update the redevelopment plan
for the adopted project area. [1990 GP Policy 112]
LU -2A.3 Prepare a specific plan to ensure that the portion of the Route 55
extension from 19th Street through the Redevelopment Area is
compatible with the Redevelopment Area and to review development
related issues on the remainder of the alignment. [1990 GP Policy 113]
LU -2A.4 In the event of damage or destruction, allow any legal conforming
use in existence at the time of adoption of the General Plan that is
located in a nonconforming development to be rebuilt to its original
building intensity, as long as any such rebuilding would not increase
the development's nonconformity, and the damage or destruction
was in no way brought about by intentional acts of any owner of such
use or property. [1990 GP Policy 114 —Modified for 2000 GP]
LU -2A.5 Develop standards, policies, and other methods to encourage the
grouping of individual parcels to eliminate obsolete subdivision
patterns and to provide improved living environments while retaining
the single-family zoning or single-family character of such areas in
the City. [1990 GP Policy 115]
-13
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 7
LU -2A.6 Do not allow "rounding up" when calculating the number of permitted
residential units except for lots existing as of March 16, 1992, zoned
R2 -MD that have less than 7,260 square feet in area, and no less
than 6,000 square feet, where density calculation fractions of 1.65 or
greater may be rounded up to two units. [1990 GP Policy 116 —
Modified for 2000 GP]
LU -2A.7 Allow creation of parcels without street frontage if sufficient
easements are provided for planned developments or common
interest developments. [1990 GP Policy 117 —Modified for 2000 GP]
LU -2A.8 Encourage increased private market investment in declining or
deteriorating neighborhoods. [1990 GP Policy 123]
LU -2A.9 Pursue maximum use of utility company funds and resources in
undergrounding existing overhead lines. [1990 GP Policy 132]
LU -2A.10 Ensure that appropriate watershed protection activities are applied to
all new development and significant redevelopment projects that are
subject to the NPDES Stormwater Permit, during the planning,
project review, and permitting processes. [New 2000 GP Policy ]
LU -2A.11 Avoid conversion of areas particularly susceptible to erosion and
sediment loss (e.g., steep slopes) and/or establish development
guidelines that identifies these areas and protects them from erosion
and sediment loss. [New 2000 GP Policy ]
LU -2A.12 Preserve or restore areas that provide water quality benefits and/or
are necessary to maintain riparian and aquatic biota. [New 2000 GP
Policy ]
LU -2A.13 Promote site development that limits impact on and protects the
natural integrity of topography, drainage systems, and water bodies.
[New 2000 GP Policy ]
LU -2A.14 Promote integration of stormwater quality protection into construction
and post -construction activities, as required by the NPDES
Stormwater Permit and the City's Local Implementation Plan. [New
2000 GP Policy ]
GOAL LU -3:
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to respond to the needs of its citizens for
housing, public services, community facilities, and safety of persons and property, to
the extent possible within budgetary constraints, and when deemed appropriate for
local governmental involvement. [1990 GP Goal IV]
Objective LU -3A. Ensure availability of adequate community facilities and provision
of the highest level of public services possible, taking into consideration budgetary
constraints and effects on the surrounding area. [1990 GP Objective IV -A]
LU -3A.1 Pursue annexation of certain areas within the City's Sphere of
Influence to control development or uses which may be detrimental
to the City. [1990 GP Policy 146]
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 8
LU -3A.2 Strongly encourage protection and preservation of existing, but
underutilized, school sites for future recreational, social, or
educational uses. [1990 GP Policy 152]
LU -3A.3 Establish a development impact fee program to fund additional fire
and police personnel, facilities, and equipment to meet the demands
of additional growth in the City. [1990 GP Policy 158 — Modified for
2000 GP]
LU -3A.4 Require appropriate site and environmental analysis for future fire
and police station site locations or for the relocation or closure of
existing fire and police facilities. [1990 GP Policy 1591
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
The goals, objectives, and policies that address circulation are as follows
GOAL CIR-1:
TRANSPORTATION
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide for a balanced, uncongested, safe,
and energy-efficient transportation system, incorporating all feasible modes of
transportation. [1990 GP Goal V]
Objective CIR-1A. To provide specific programs and policies that address multi-
modal transportation, multi -agency coordination, mitigation of traffic impacts and the
balancing of land uses with transportation systems. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CIR-1A.1 Develop the City's Master Plan of Bikeways by pursuing funding
mechanisms and incorporating roadway widening projects into the
design and development of all new commercial and industrial
projects and public facilities. [1990 GP Policy 162]
CIR-1A.2 Require dedication of right-of-way in an equitable manner for
completion of adopted bikeway system as condition of development
of adjacent properties. [1990 GP Policy 163]
CIR-1A.3 Coordinate the design and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle
ways in major residential, shopping, and employment centers, parks,
schools, other public facilities, public transportation facilities, and
bicycle networks with adjacent cities. [1990 GP Policy 179]
CIR-1A.4 Include bicycle lanes on all new bridges along Master Plan of
Bikeway designated arterials within or adjacent to the City. In cases
where bridges are not located within the City, the City should exert
its influence on responsible agencies to include such bicycle lanes.
If provision of bicycle lanes is not feasible, measures should be
taken to prohibit bicycle riding on bridge walkways. [1990 GP Policy
164]
CIR-1A.5 Investigate all available operational measures, including the use of
one-way streets, to improve traffic circulation and minimize delay and
congestion on arterials. [1990 GP Policy 168]
q5
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 9
CIR-1A.6 Require dedication of right-of-way, in an equitable manner, for
development that increases the intensity of land use. [1990 GP
Policy 169]
CIR-1A.7 Implement citywide and/or areawide transportation system
improvement programs on new development and fee programs for
new development. [1990 GP Policy 170]
CIR-1A.8 Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and housing into
major development projects to reduce vehicle use. [1990 GP Policy
177]
CIR-1A.9 Encourage permitted General Plan land uses which generate high
traffic volumes to be located near major transportation corridors and
public transit facilities to minimize vehicle use, congestion, and
delay. [1990 GP Policy 178 — Modified for 2000 GP]
CIR-1A.10 Allow the application of transportation management rideshare
programs, integration of complementary land uses, and other
methods to reduce project related average daily and peak hour
vehicle trips in order to achieve consistency with allocated trip
budgets. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CIR-1A.11 Attempt to maintain or improve mobility within the City to achieve a
standard level of service not worse than Level of Service "D" at all
intersections under the sole control of the City. Intersection level of
service analyses for General Plan conditions shall be updated
periodically and presented to City Council. [1990 GP Policy 186 —
Modified for 2000 GP]
CIR-1A.12 Cooperate adjacent jurisdictions to maintain or improve mobility
within the City to achieve a standard level of service no worse than
"D" at all intersections under State or joint control (). Intersection
level of service analyses for General Plan conditions for locations
under State or joint control shall be updated periodically and
presented to City Council. [1990 GP Policy 187 — Modified for 2000
GP]
CIR-1A.13 While the Gisler Road segment, west of Harbor, will exceed its
theoretical maximum capacity, the City shall work to ensure that the
future volume to capacity ratios do not exceed those identified in
Table CIR-3 of the General Plan. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CIR-1A.14 Reduce or eliminate intrusion of commuter through traffic on local
streets in residential neighborhoods. [1990 GP Policy 189]
CIR-1A.15 Prioritize intersection improvements which improve through traffic
flow on major, primary, and secondary arterials, and reduce impacts
on local neighborhood streets with emphasis on pedestrian safety.
[1990 GP Policy 190 — Modified for 2000 GP]
CIR-1A.16 Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by
phasing new development to levels that can be accommodated by
roadways existing or planned to exist at the time of completion of
each phase of the project. [1990 GP Policy 192]
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 10
CIR-1A.17 Work closely with the State of California and other government
agencies to control traffic -related impacts of uses on State- or other
agency -owned land (i.e., Orange County Fairgrounds, Orange Coast
College, etc.). [1990 GP Policy 194]
CIR-1A.18 Council shall review the results and findings of the (SARX) study to
delete the Gisler Avenue and 19th Street bridges over the Santa Ana
River as needed. Upon completion of the study and approval of the
changes to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)
Master Plan of Arterial Highways by the OCTA Board, the City shall
process a General Plan Amendment to delete the bridges from the
City's Master Plan of Highways. All future development applications
submitted to the City shall be reviewed in such a way that the 19th
Street and Gisler Avenue bridges will not be included as mitigation
measures. [1990 GP Policy 195 – Modified for 2000 GP]
CIR-1A.19 Minimize circulation improvements that will necessitate the taking of
private property on existing developed properties. [1990 GP Policy
198]
CIR-1A.20 Encourage Orange County Transportation Authority to downgrade
Mesa Verde Drive, Baker Street west of Harbor Boulevard, and
Gisler Avenue to a designation less than a Collector Street in the
Master Plan of Arterial Highways. [1990 GP Policy 199 – Modified
for 2000 GP]
CIR-1A.21 Encourage Orange County Transportation Authority to downgrade
Arlington Avenue between Fairview Road and Newport Boulevard to
a Collector Street. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CIR-1A.22 Encourage Orange County Transportation Authority to downgrade
Baker Street between Redhill Avenue and Bristol Street, and Redhill
Avenue between 1-405 and Bristol Street to Primary Arterial from
current Major Arterial designation. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide for standard service levels at
signalized intersections by constructing capacity improvements for all various modes
of circulation, adopting land use intensities commensurate with planned circulation
improvements and implementing traffic demand reduction programs, thereby creating
a more energy efficient transportation system. [1990 GP Goal VI]
Objective CIR-2A. To avoid roadways exceeding theoretical maximum capacity by
constructing and/or enhancing capacity of the master planned circulation system of
freeways and arterial highways. [1990 GP Objective VI -A – Modified for 2000 GP]
CIR-2A.1 Coordinate with Caltrans for future consideration of the extension of
Route 55 (the Costa Mesa Freeway) from 19th Street to the southern
City boundary. [1990 GP Policy 204 – Modified for 2000 GP]
CIR-2A.2 Coordinate with the Orange County Transportation Authority and
with adjacent jurisdictions to improve signal timing and coordination
along major arterials. [1990 GP Policy 207]
_11—
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 11
CIR-2A.3 Continue to work with Caltrans to synchronize and coordinate traffic
signals on arterials at intersections controlled by Caltrans. [1990 GP
Policy 210]
CIR-2A.4 Continue to evaluate and pursue design and operational
improvements (medians, driveway closures, signal synchronization
or phasing, parking or turn restrictions, etc.). [1990 GP Policy 212 –
Modified for 2000 GP]
Obiective CIR-21B. To promote the use of high occupancy vehicular modes of
transportation in and through the City. [1990 GP Objective VI -13 – Modified for 2000
GP]
CIR-213.1 Coordinate with OCTA to construct bus turnouts at appropriate
locations with attractive shelters designed for safe and comfortable
use. [1990 GP Policy 214]
Objective CIR-2C. To invest capital via a rationally phased allocation process for
implementing transportation projects and programs. [1990 GP Objective VI -C]
CIR-2C.1 Support efforts to design and construct an urban rail project as it
extends through Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CIR-2C.2 Complete and annually maintain a needs assessment for traffic
service levels and traffic safety. Develop and annually update a
priority list of improvement projects, with priorities based on 1)
correcting identified hazards; 2) improving/maintaining peak hour
traffic volumes; 3) improving efficiency of existing infrastructure
utilization; and 4) intergovernmental coordination. [1990 GP Policy
218 and 219 – Modified for 2000 GP]
Obiective CIR-2D. To ensure that the transportation related impacts of development
projects are mitigated to the fullest extent possible, in conformance with
transportation related policies. [1990 GP Objective XIV -13]
CIR-2D.1 Circulation improvements required to provide or attain the minimum
traffic level of service standard at an intersection to which a
development project contributes measurable traffic shall be
completed within three years of issuance of the first building permit
for said project, unless additional right-of-way or coordination with
other government agencies is required to complete the improvement.
Improvements may be required sooner if, because of extraordinary
traffic generation characteristics of the project or extraordinary
impacts to the surrounding circulation system, such improvements
are necessary to prevent significant adverse impacts. [1990 GP
Policy 309]
CIR-2D.2 Construction of circulation improvements for phased development
projects may be constructed commensurate with the project
construction based upon the findings of a traffic study approved by
the City of Costa Mesa. [1990 GP Policy 309A]
CIR-2D.3 A traffic impact fee shall be maintained for circulation system
improvements to the Master Plan of Highways within the community
and updated annually. [1990 GP Policy 311 – Modified for 2000 GP]
—48—
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 12
CIR-2DA Require discussion of transit service needs and site design amenities
for transit ridership in EIRs for major projects. [1990 GP Policy 160]
CIR-2D.5 Require discussion of transportation system management (TSM) and
transportation demand management (TDM) measures in all EIRs
prepared for major projects. [1990 GP Policy 161]
Growth Management: Refer to Goal GM -1, Objective GM -1A and Policies GM -1A.1
through GM -1A.6 found in the Growth Management Element.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
The following goals, objectives and policies are designed to meet all of the Growth
Management Element requirements for Developed Communities as set forth by
Measure M and elaborated by the Countywide Growth Management Program
Implementation Manual.
GOAL GM -1:
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to reduce traffic congestion and to ensure that
adequate transportation facilities are provided for existing and future residents of the
community through effective and comprehensive growth management practices
consistent with the Land Use Element. [1990 GP Goal XIV]
Obiective GM -1A. To provide and maintain a circulation system that operates within
established traffic level of service standards. [1990 GP Objective XIV -A]
GM -1A.1 Recognizing the constraints of existing physical development
conditions, the city shall strive to achieve a balance of land uses
whereby residential, commercial, industrial and public land uses are
proportionally balanced. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
GM -1A.2 Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by
phasing new development to levels that can be accommodated by
roadways existing or planned to exist at the time of completion of
each phase of the project. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
GM -1A.3 The established level of service standard shall not apply to
intersections under the jurisdiction of another city, the County of
Orange or the State of California or to intersections included on the
Deficient Intersection List as established by the Congestion
Management Program (CMP) and/or the City. [New Policy for 2000
GPI
GM -1A.4 Every new development project shall pay its share of costs
associated with the mitigation of project generated impacts,. [1990
GP Policy 310 — Modified for 2000 GP]
GM -1A.5 New Measure M sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace
private developer funding which has been committed for any project
or normal subdivision obligations. [1990 GP Policy 3151
GM -1A.6 The City's seven year capital improvement program shall be adopted
and maintained in conformance with the provisions of Measure M for
4q
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 13
the purpose of maintaining the established level of service standard.
[1990 GP Policy 320]
Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program. Refer to Goal LU -
1, Land Use Objective LU -E.4 found in the Land Use Element.
HOUSING ELEMENT
Costa Mesa's housing goals concentrate on five specific aspects of the
housing market. Goals are provided to address each of these issues, and
policies are developed to support and implement each goal. The five
priorities are:
♦ Preserving and enhancing existing housing and neighborhoods;
♦ Preserving affordability;
Providing adequate sites;
Providing adequate housing opportunities and accessibility for all
segments of the community; and
♦ Encouraging coordination and cooperation.
FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION
Prior to the development of a program -specific housing strategy, it is
necessary to establish the relative priorities of the identified housing
needs and to assess the nature and extent of the City's existing housing
programs.
The process of prioritizing housing needs involves the identification of
target households and neighborhoods as well as a preliminary analysis
of the most appropriate housing programs and/or resources to meet
these needs.
TARGET HOUSEHOLDS AND NEIGHBORHOODS
High construction costs, coupled with the diminishing availability of vacant
land, limit the large scale expansion of the housing stock. Preservation and
enhancement of the City's existing neighborhoods is vital to the
maintenance of a viable urban community.
In particular, target neighborhoods have: 1) significant concentrations of
low- and moderate -income persons, or blighted and deteriorated housing;
and 2) community development needs in terms of housing, public facilities,
and public improvements. As such, these neighborhoods should be
targeted for housing programs/assistance.
Currently, there are several target neighborhoods identified throughout
the southwest section of the City. Specific Plans have been created to
address these neighborhoods such as the SoBeca Urban Plan, the
Westside Implementation Plan, Newport Boulevard Specific Plan, and
the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, all discussed previously.
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 14
GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL HOU-1:
PRESERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to preserve the availability of existing
housing opportunities and to conserve as well as enhance the quality of
existing dwelling units and residential neighborhoods.
POLICIES HOU-1:
HOU-1.1 Develop standards and/or guidelines for new development
with emphasis on site (including minimum site security
lighting) and building design to minimize vulnerability to
criminal activity.
HOU-1.2 Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods,
including but not limited to mobile home parks and
manufactured home parks, from the encroachment of
incompatible or potentially disruptive land uses and/or
activities.
HOU-1.3 Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or
abandoned vehicles, outdoor storage, and substandard or
illegal buildings and establish regulations to abate weed -
filled yards when any of the above is deemed to constitute
a health, safety or fire hazard.
HOU-1.4 Establish code enforcement as a high priority and provide
adequate funding and staffing to support code
enforcement programs.
HOU-1.5 PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO
HOMEOWNERS IN EXISTING OWNER -OCCUPIED
RESIDENCES WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
TO USE FOR THE REHABILITATION OF THEIR
PROPERTY.
HOU-1.6 Install and upgrade public service facilities (streets, alleys,
and utilities) to encourage increased private market
investment in declining or deteriorating neighborhoods.
HOU-1.7 Continue existing rehabilitation loan and grant programs
for low and moderate -income homeowners and rental
property landlords as long as funds are available.
HOU-1.8 Minimize the displacement of existing residences due to
public projects.
HOU-1.9 Encourage the development of housing that fulfills
specialized needs.
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 15
GOAL HOU-2:
PRESERVING AND EXPANDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide a range of housing
choices for all social and economic segments of the community, including
housing for persons with special needs. This goal can be achieved by
implementing the following policies:
HOU-2.1
Encourage concurrent applications (i.e., rezones, tentative
tract maps, conditional use permits, variance requests,
etc.) if multiple approvals are required, and if consistent
with applicable processing requirements.
HOU-2.2
Promote the use of State density bonus provisions to
encourage the development of affordable housing for
lower and moderate income households, as well as senior
housing.
HOU-2.3
Provide incentive bonus units to encourage the
redevelopment of residential units that are nonconforming
in terms of density. The incentive shall be limited to the
multi -family residential land use designations. The density
incentive shall be limited to an increase of 25 percent
above Medium -Density or an increase of 50 percent above
High -Density. In no case shall the resulting number of
units exceed the existing number of units on each site.
HOU-2.4
Encourage developers to employ innovative or alternative
construction methods to reduce housing costs and
increase housing supply.
HOU-2.5
Continue membership in the Orange County Housing
Authority to provide housing assistance to very low income
households.
HOU-2.6 Provide clear rules, policies, and procedures, for
reasonable accommodation in order to promote equal
access to housing. Policies and procedures should be
ministerial and include but not be limited to identifying
who may request a reasonable accommodation (i.e.,
persons with disabilities, family -members, landlords,
etc.), timeframes for decision-making, and provision for
relief from the various land -use, zoning, or building
regulations that may constrain the housing for persons of
disabilities.
HOU-2.7 Monitor the implementation of the jurisdiction's
ordinances, codes, policies, and procedures to ensure
they comply with the "reasonable accommodation" for
disabled provisions and all fair housing laws.
GOAL HOU-3:
PROVISION OF ADEQUATE SITES
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide adequate, suitable sites
for residential use and development or maintenance of a range of housing
IS2 1—
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 16
that varies sufficiently in terms of cost, design, size, location, and tenure to
meet the housing needs of all segments of the community at a level that
can be supported by infrastructure. This goal can be achieved by adhering
to the following policies.
HOU-3.1 Encourage the conversion of existing marginal or vacant
commercial and/or industrial land to residential, where
feasible and consistent with environmental conditions that
are suitable for new residential development.
HOU-3.2 Provide opportunities for the development of well planned
and designed projects which, through vertical or horizontal
integration, provide for the development of compatible
residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or public
uses within a single project or neighborhood.
HOU-3.3 Cooperate with large employers, the Chamber of
Commerce, and major commercial and industrial
developers to identify and implement programs to balance
employment growth with the ability to provide housing
opportunities affordable to the incomes of the newly
created job opportunities.
HOU-3.4 Consider the potential impact on housing opportunities
and existing residential neighborhoods when reviewing
rezone petitions affecting residential properties.
GOAL HOU-4:
EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to ensure that all existing and future
housing opportunities are open and available to all social and economic
segments of the community without discrimination on the basis of race,
color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, marital status, age,
household composition or size, or any other arbitrary factors.
HOU-4.1 Support the intent and spirit of equal housing opportunities
as expressed in the Civil Rights Act of 1886, Title VII of the
1968 Civil Rights Act, California Rumford Fair Housing Act,
and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act.
HOU-4.2 Continue to provide fair housing and counseling services
for all Costa Mesa residents in an effort to remove barriers
and promote access to affordable housing in the City.
HOU-4.3 Encourage programs that address the housing needs of
senior citizens.
HOU-4.4 Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and
preservation of residential developments which will meet
the needs of families and individuals with specialized
housing requirements.
_-.
4S:3 -
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL HOU-5:
COORDINATION AND COOPERATION
PAGE 17
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to coordinate local housing efforts
with appropriate federal, state, regional, and local governments and/or
agencies and to cooperate in the implementation of intergovernmental
housing programs to ensure maximum effectiveness in solving local and
regional housing problems.
HOU-5.1 Investigate alternative intergovernmental arrangements
and program options to deal with area -wide housing
issues and problems.
IMPLEMENTING PROGRAMS
PRESERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT
1. Single -Family Rehabilitation Loan Program
This program is designed to assist qualified property owners to improve
single-family properties. Eligible improvements include, but not limited to,
health and safety code items such as plumbing, electrical, roofing, etc.
Room addition to correct overcrowding issues is also an eligible activity
under this program. The program offers deferred payment loans at zero -
percent interest that is fully deferred until sale or refinance of the property.
Maximum loan -to -value is 85 percent of the current market value. City staff
will encourage the participation of seniors in this program. However, this
program has a waiting list of two years, based on limited funding available.
Qualified emergency repairs are given priority for funding.
2008-2014 Objectives: Assist 10 households annually for a total of 60
households (15 extremely low income, 20 very low income, and 25 low
income)
Funding Sources: HOME; Redevelopment Housing Set -Aside
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division
2. Neighborhood Improvement Grant Program
Small grants are available to assist with property improvements for both
income -qualified single-family property owners and mobile home owners.
City staff will encourage the participation of seniors in this program. This
program also has a waiting list of two years due to funding limitation and
qualified emergency repairs are given priority.
2008-2014 Objectives: Assist 30 households annually for a total of 180
households (60 extremely low income, 60 very low income, and 60 low
income)
Funding Sources: HOME; Redevelopment Housing Set -Aside
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division
-IS-4-
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
3. Neighborhood Clean Up
PAGE 18
The City of Costa Mesa, the Orange County Fair Grounds, and the
Volunteer Center of Orange County join forces to sponsor semi-annual
"Neighbors for Neighbors" community clean-up days. The program uses
volunteers to assist low income seniors in cleaning up their homes.
2008-2014 Objectives: Assist 10 households annually for a total of 60
households (30 extremely low income and 30 very low income)
Funding Sources: CDBG
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division
4. Mobile Home Park Preservation
The City preserves mobile homes as an affordable housing resource
through two strategies. Specifically, the City provides financial assistance
to eligible owner -occupants to rehabilitate existing dwelling units through
deferred payment low-interest loans. A Mobile Home Park Conversion
Permit should be obtained as a prerequisite to the conversion of an existing
mobile home park or manufactured housing park. The conditions shall
include a provision for reasonable relocation assistance when the park is
converted to a commercial or industrial use.
2008-2014 Objectives: Rehabilitation objectives are included under
Program 2, Neighborhood Improvement.
Funding Sources: CDBG
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division; Development Services Department/Planning
Division
PRESERVING AND EXPANDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES
5. Incentives for Affordable Housing
The City will continue to pursue funding, partner with nonprofits and provide
incentives (i.e., density bonuses, fee reduction, etc.) to developers that
agree to reserve a portion of the project units for very low, low, or moderate
income households (common interest developments only), or for seniors.
The City will also defer payment of fees for affordable housing projects
upon certificate of occupancy.
2008-2014 Objectives: Promote the use of density bonus incentives and
deferral of fees for affordable housing projects, including but not limited to,
the Urban Plan areas, in North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area, and in the
Downtown Redevelopment Project Area. Density bonus information is
available on the City's website and at the public counter and will be
provided to developers of projects in the Urban Plan areas, North Costa
Mesa Specific Plan area, and Downtown Redevelopment Project Area.
Specifically, the City will utilize density bonus and other incentives to
facilitate affordable housing development at the Fairview Developmental
`J D
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 19
Center site, the Senior Center site and other sites to be identified consistent
with affordability and capacity assumption in Section 5.7.
The City will meet with developers, including nonprofits and community
stakeholders and establish a strategy by December 2009 for promoting
new construction of rental units affordable to lower income families in the
Urban Plan Areas. As part of the strategy, the City will target a range of
local, state and federal resources (administrative and financial) and
annually identify potential projects/developers to partner and apply or
support applications for funds from State and Federal programs, especially
new construction for families. The City will consider a variety of ways to
assist in the development of 100 rental units affordable to lower income
families in the Urban Plan Areas, including the identification of suitable
sites, promoting acquisition and assemblage, priority processing and
facilitating entitlements and incentives beyond density bonuses pursuant to
Government Code Section 65915.
Funding Sources: Department/Division budget provided by General Fund,
Redevelopment Set-aside Funds, State Department of Housing and
Community Development Funds, Low Income Housing Tax Credits and
CaIHFA
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
6. Second Units and Granny Flats
Second units in Costa Mesa are permitted as accessory apartments and
granny units. Due to the small lot sizes and built out character of the City,
opportunities for second units are limited. Nevertheless, second units offer
affordable housing opportunities for lower and moderate income
households. During the past few years, about two granny units were
constructed each year.
2008-2014 Objectives: Promote the use of accessory apartments and
second units by providing information on the City's website and at public
counters.
Funding Sources: Department/Division budget provided by General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
7. Federal/State Housing Programs
The City will provide technical assistance to developers, nonprofit
organizations, or other qualified private sector interests in the application
and development of projects using Federal and State housing
programs/grants.
2008-2014 Objectives: Encourage private sector to utilize available
Federal and State housing programs to increase the supply of extremely
low, very low, low and moderate income housing. If proposed projects are
consistent with the vision, goals, and objectives of the City's General Plan
and other planning documents that guide residential development, the City
will provide letters of support for funding applications. In 2008, the City will
G%
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 20
finalize the budget for Bethel Towers. As necessary, the City will apply for
either a HUD Section 108 loan or funding from HCD to help preserve the
at -risk units at Bethel Towers. In conjunction with potential affordable
housing projects in the City (e.g. at the Fairview Developmental Center and
the Senior Center), the City will pursue affordable housing funds from HCD
to leverage local resources. Annually, the City will contact nonprofit
housing developers to explore potential affordable housing projects and
funding possibilities.
Funding Sources: Department/Division budgets provided by General
Fund
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division
8. Rental Housing Assistance
The City will continue to participate in the Orange County Housing
Authority's Housing Choice Vouchers program to provide rent subsidies to
very low income households.
2008-2014 Objectives: Continue to provide assistance to 463 very low
income households in the City. Continue to promote the use of Housing
Choice vouchers by providing program information on City website and at
public counters. Encourage property owners to accept Housing Choice
Vouchers.
Funding Sources: HUD Section 8 Housing Choice funds administered by
the Orange County Housing Authority
Responsible Agencies: Orange County Housing Authority and City
Manager/Housing and Community Development Division
9. First -Time Homebuyer Assistance
Costs Mesa assists moderate income homebuyers through its Homebuyer
Assistance Loan program. This program provides a sizable second
mortgage to income qualified homebuyers to purchase a home in the City.
Loans are made on a deferred payment, shared appreciation basis.
2008-2014 Objectives: Assist a total of 8 households (8 moderate income)
Funding Sources: Redevelopment Housing Set -Aside
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division
10. First -Time Homebuyer New Construction and
Acquisition/Rehabilitation
The City will work with qualified developers to develop ownership housing
affordable to low and moderate income households. The City will pursue
acquisition/ rehabilitation opportunities where the City would acquire
underutilized properties for construction of affordable ownership housing by
qualified developers. The City will also provide first-time homebuyer loans
--S9 ^
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 21
that include rehabilitation costs to target less expensive homes and reduce
slums and blight.
2008-2014 Objectives: Monitor properties available in the community and
pursue funding alternatives to implement program.
Funding Sources: Redevelopment Housing Set -Aside; HOME
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division; Development Services Department/Planning
Division
11. PRESERVATION OF AT -RISK HOUSING
Two projects at risk of converting to market -rate housing between 2008 and
2018: 75 -unit Casa Bella senior housing project and 270 -unit Bethel
Towers. The City has identified Bethel Towers as a key project to pursue
over the next two years. Redevelopment housing set-aside funds have
been allocated to provide rehabilitation and conservation improvements to
Bethel Towers in exchange for an extension of the affordability covenant.
Preservation of Bethel Towers would benefit many seniors with extremely
low and very low incomes.
2008-2014 Objectives: Monitor at -risk status of Casa Bella and work with
HUD and property owner to extend the affordability covenant on this
project. Notify tenants of potential risk of conversion at least one year prior
to conversion. Undertake the following activities in preserve the
affordability of the 270 -unit Bethel Towers and 75 -unit Casa Bella senior
housing project.
Specifically, the City shall comply with the State's guidance in determining
whether the provisions of Government Code Section 65583.1(c) can be
used to address the adequate sites program requirement.
City public hearings to establish that the units were eligible and
were reasonably expected to convert to market rate units. The City
conducted several public hearings regarding Bethel Towers. On
May 1, 2007, City Council approved Resolution No. 07-44 which
included Bethel Towers in the Annual Action Plan with $142,027 of
funding designated for improvements to the eligible low-income
facility for seniors. In February 2008, Council held a study session
for the Draft Housing Element On May 6, 2008, which identified
Bethel Towers as an at -risk preservation project. On May 6, 2008,
City Council considered that the affordability covenants on Bethel
Towers which were scheduled to expire in January 1, 2017.
Council approved Resolution No. 08-34 approving an additional
$385,000 in HOME funds for the FY 2008-2009 CDBG/HOME
budget for Bethel Towers. On May 13, 2008, the Costa Mesa
Redevelopment Agency adopted Resolution No. 01-2008
approving the RDA budget for FY 2008/08. Council included
$262,079 in redevelopment low/moderate set-aside funds to be
allocated for Bethel Towers.
The City Council will also conduct a public hearing in the Fall of
2008 to reaffirm the at -risk status of Bethel Towers and its eligibility
for receiving RHNA credits under Housing Element Law.
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 22
♦ Funding will be sufficient to develop the identified units at
affordable rents by Fall 2008. City will establish a funding plan in
2008 to augment the $762,579 already set aside for extending the
affordability covenant on the 270 -unit Bethel Towers and begin
negotiation with owners of Bethel Towers in the Fall of 2008.
♦ Additional funding will be pursued to maintain the units as decent,
safe and sanitary upon occupancy. Pursue a Section 108 loan or
other funding sources as necessary in 2008/2009 to augment
funding already set aside for Bethel Towers. Complete
rehabilitation and preservation of Bethel Towers is anticipated to
occur by June 30, 2012.
A legally enforcement agreement with Bethel Towers will be
executed by June 30, 2010. This agreement serves to rehabilitate
and preserve the 270 units as housing affordable to lower income
seniors.
Funding Sources: Redevelopment Housing Set -Aside; HOME; Section
108 Loan
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division
12. Single -Room Occupancy (SRO), Family Residential Occupancy
(FRO), Extended Stay Units
SRO hotels offer basic, safe housing to the working poor, homeless,
seniors, and students, i.e. households with extremely low and very low
incomes. The City encourages the development of SRO hotels in
commercial areas. As funding permits, the City will provide financial
assistance and offer zoning reliefs to facilitate the new construction and/or
conversion of existing motels into SRO hotels.
Motel rooms may also be converted into Family Residential Occupancy
(FRO) where two or three motel rooms may be merged to create units that
can accommodate single -parent or other small families.
The City would also promote the conversion of motel rooms into extended
stay units. Up to 25 percent of the rooms at a motel establishment may be
converted to extended stay units without a conditional use permit.
The City will establish a SRO/FRO program for projects involving the
conversion of an existing motel/hotel use into a residential use for single -
room occupancy or family -residential occupancy units. This program
would provide development incentives to encourage these conversions.
This program may also include the deferral of fee payment upon
certificate of occupancy, rather than prior to building permit issuance to
reduce developer construction financing costs and overall development
costs for housing affordable to extremely low/lower-income and female
head of households.
2008-2014 Objectives: Maintain a list of existing motels with potential for
conversion into SRO, FRO, or extended stay units in 2009 and make list
available to interested affordable housing developers. Promote the
- Sq
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 23
conversion of motel rooms into 170 SRO or FRO units by adopting
development incentives in 2009. The City may defer payment of fees until
certificate of occupancy and also allow increased flexibility with
integration SRO and FRO units within in the same motel complex.
Funding Sources: Redevelopment Housing Set -Aside; HOME
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division
13. Supportive Services for Persons with Special Needs
The City recognizes certain segments of the population require additional
assistance to secure decent housing and supportive services. Special
needs groups in Costa Mesa include: seniors, persons with disabilities,
homeless and at -risk homeless, and low income families (including large
households, female -headed households).
Through the annual action plan process for the CDBG program, the City
evaluates the needs of various special needs groups and allocation CDBG
Public Service dollars accordingly. The City will continue to expend CDBG
funds in a manner that addresses local needs and augments the regional
continuum of care system in Orange County.
2008-2014 Objectives: Conduct needs assessment through the annual
planning and performance review processes of the CDBG program.
Through the CDBG Request for Proposal process, identify service gaps
and prioritize funding allocations. Provide public service grants to:
♦ Support emergency shelters for 30 persons annually (180 persons
total)
• Support senior services for 600 seniors annually (3,600 seniors
total)
♦ Provide employment training, housing, and other services for 100
persons with disabilities (600 persons total)
♦ Provide supportive services for 20 low income persons at risk of
homelessness annually (120 persons total)
Funding Sources: CDBG
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division
14. Reasonable Accommodation Ordinance
The City will amend its reasonable accommodation ordinance to provide
exception in zoning and land use for housing for persons with disabilities.
This procedure will be a ministerial process, with minimal or no
processing fee, subject to approval by the Development Services
Director applying the following decision-making criteria:
The request for reasonable accommodation will be used by an
individual with a disability protected under fair housing laws.
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 24
2. The requested accommodation is necessary to make housing
available to an individual with a disability protected under fair
housing laws.
3. The requested accommodation would not impose an undue
financial or administrative burden on the City.
4. The requested accommodation would not require a fundamental
alteration in the nature of the City's land use and zoning
program.
2008-2014 Objectives: Adopt Zoning Code Amendment by December
2008.
Funding Sources: Department/Division budget provided by General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
15. Fee Deferral for Reasonable Accommodation and Affordable
Housing
The City will establish a Fee Deferral program for projects requesting
Reasonable Accommodation or for affordable housing projects. This
program would allow payment of fees upon certificate of occupancy,
rather than prior to building permit issuance to reduce developer
construction financing costs and overall development costs for housing
affordable to lower-income households.
2008-2014 Objectives: Establish Fee Deferral Program by December
31, 2008.
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
Funding Sources: General Fund
16. Build Green Program
In 2007, the City formed a task force to take a closer look at sustainable
building design, which included features and technologies that can help
conserve energy consumption. The Costa Mesa "Green Team" was
established to evaluate the feasibility of integrating sustainable building
techniques in new publicly and privately developed projects as well as
major retrofits. The Build Green policy afforded the following incentives
for green development:
1. A fee waiver program for remodeling and upgrading existing
residential structures such as installation of solar or tankless
water heaters, replacement of HVAC equipment with Energy
efficient units, installation of cool roofs, and reroofs with Class A
assembly. The fee waiver ranges from $50 for installation of a
tankless water heater to $800 for Energy Star certification of
existing structures and could go up to $30,000 for LEED
certification of new construction.
-01-
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 25
2. A rebate program for projects with Green certification (i.e., CA
Green
Builder, LEED, and GreenPoint Rated).
2008-2014 Objectives: Implement the Build Green Program in FY
2008/09.
Funding Sources: General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
and Building Divisions
PROVISION OF ADEQUATE SITES
17. Adequate Sites
The City will maintain an inventory of vacant and underutilized sites and
provide this inventory to interested developers. The City will monitor its
status of meeting the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) annually
and ensure that the City has adequate sites available to accommodate its
remaining RHNA of 445 units (244 very low and 201 low income).
2008-2014 Objectives: Update inventory of vacant and underutilized sites
annually and provide information to interested developers. When rezoning
occurs, evaluate the impact of rezoning on the City's continued ability to
meet its RHNA.
Funding Sources: Department/Division budget provided by General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
18. Fairview Developmental Center
The City will process a General Plan amendment and Rezone for the
Fairview Developmental Center site to allow high density residential
development. This program would also allow payment of fees upon
certificate of occupancy, rather than prior to building permit issuance to
reduce developer construction financing costs and overall development
costs for housing affordable to lower-income households. Finally, the
program will also establish a site-specific density of 30 du/ac by right for
the affordable housing project.
2008-2014 Objectives: Process General Plan amendment and rezone
by December 31, 2008. Work with the Fairview Developmental Center to
include 170 affordable units to lower income households.
Funding Sources: General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
t02—
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
19. Land Acquisition
PAGE 26
As funding permits, the City will acquire privately owned land to assemble a
site(s) suitable for the development of new housing for lower and moderate
income seniors, persons with disabilities, and/or families.
2008-2014 Objectives: Maintain a list of opportunity sites and monitor for -
sale status of available properties. Specific actions/assistance that may be
offered by the City include:
♦ Use of City funds to acquire and assemble parcels into site(s) of
adequate size to permit development of new residential units;
♦ Provision of relocation assistance to displaced tenants;
♦ Assistance in clearance of structures acquired and site preparation;
♦ Disposal of the site(s) to private developer utilizing write-down
method;
♦ Partnership in the application for additional funding for the
construction of units;
♦ Provision of density bonus incentives; and/or
♦ Priority for processing the development review.
Funding Sources: Redevelopment Housing Set -Aside; HOME
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division
20. Mixed -Use Developments
The City will continue to promote mixed-use development in the Urban
Plans, the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, and Downtown Redevelopment
Plan areas. Specifically the City will maintain a list of opportunity sites and
market these sites to interested developers. The City will respond to market
conditions and offer appropriate incentives through the Mixed Use Overlay
zone. Incentives include:
♦ Reduced parking standards
♦ Increased densities
♦ Increased height limit
♦ Increased lot coverage
♦ Reduced setbacks
2008-2014 Objectives: Update inventory of opportunity sites at least every
six months and make inventory available to interested developers.
Evaluate incentives package annually.
Funding Sources: Department/Division budget provided by General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
21. Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing, and Supportive Housing
Emergency shelters, transitional housing, and supportive housing are
housing options that benefit primarily extremely low and very low income
households. The City will amend the Zoning Code to specific emergency
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 27
shelters as a permitted use in the R3 and PDR -HD zoning districts.
Specific development and performance standards will be established in the
Zoning Code to regulate the development of emergency shelters.
The code amendment will also specify standards such as number of
occupancy, onsite management, security provisions and distance
requirements so that the operation of emergency shelters remains
compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Furthermore the code
amendment will include transitional housing and supportive housing as a
residential use of the property and subject to the same regulations of
residential uses within the same zone. Finally, the code amendment would
allow emergency shelters as permitted uses (by right), without requiring
discretionary review in the R3 and PDR -HD zones.
2008-2014 Objectives: Amend the Zoning Code by December 31, 2009.
Funding Sources: Department/Division budget provided by General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
22. Removing Governmental Constraints in Processing and Permit
Procedures
State Law requires that the City permit multi -family residential uses by
right, sufficient to accommodate the need for lower-income households.
By right, pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(i) means local
government review must not require a conditional use permit, planned
unit development, or other discretionary review or approval.
Strictly applied to affordable housing projects with a minimum density of
20 units per acre, this program would remove governmental constraints
and discretionary review related to the density of affordable housing
projects. The Costa Mesa Municipal Code requires developments of five
units or more to undergo "Design Review" by the Planning Commission.
Design Review is a planning process involving site plan review and
approval. As a discretionary review process, Design Review may involve
modifications to the proposed project and the reduction of the originally
proposed density.
This program would continue to allow site plan review regarding design
elements and development standards of an affordable housing project
(i.e. circulation pathways, architecture, setbacks, parking requirements,
height, and landscaping). However, this program would eliminate any
discretionary review of the project density of an affordable housing
project to ensure that the proposed density is not modified or reduced.
This is to ensure that the affordable housing units are not reduced in
number as a result of the Design Review process.
This program achieves the intent of State Law to remove governmental
constraints to the production of affordable housing projects involving: (1)
minimum 16 units per site; (2) minimum 20 units per acre density; and
(3) demonstration of at least 50 percent of the lower-income needs to be
accommodate on sites designated for residential use only.
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 28
This program complies with State housing objectives to limit
discretionary review of high-density affordable housing projects for the
following reasons:
Program would limit judgment to site plan design and residential
development standards. The Planning Commission review
would strictly be related to design elements such as
vehicle/pedestrian circulation, locations of ingress/egress points,
bulk/massing of structures, lot coverage, building height, and
building design. In addition to land use compatibility issues,
Planning Commission will continue to have discretionary review
over the appearance and functionality of the residential
development for quality assurance. The program continues to
reinforce the central intent of Design Review to produce well-
designed residential communities.
Program would remove all discretion related to reducing density
or housing affordability for proiects with a minimum of 20 units
per acre. The current Zoning Code provisions for Design Review
(i.e. site plan review) allow the Planning Commission to have
discretion over the proposed density of a project. Theoretically,
the Planning Commission could reduce the project density
through the Design Review process. However, this new program
would remove the Planning Commission's ability to modify the
residential density of affordable housing projects in order to
implement the State's housing objectives for low-income
households. Therefore, for affordable housing projects in high-
density residential zones (R3, PDR -HD, and mixed-use overlay
zones), the 20 unit per acre density is considered permitted by
right and cannot be reduced through the design review process.
However, all other design review by the Planning Commission
related to the project design, height, landscaping, parking and
related development standards is still required.
Program would ensure affordable housing proiects are permitted
by right in high-density residential zones. The schedule of
actions for this program involves a code amendment to Title 13,
Section 13-28(e), Design Review, of the Costa Mesa Municipal
Code. Additional design review findings addressing the
provision of affordable housing at critical mass of 20 dwelling
units per acre may be added to Title 13, Section 13-29(g)(14),
Design Review Findings, of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code.
The Zoning Code amendment would ensure that affordable
housing projects of 20 units per acre densities are permitted by
right.
2008-2014 Objectives: Amend the Zoning Code by December 31,
2009.
Funding Sources: Department/Division budget provided by General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
23. Annual General Plan Review
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 29
The City will continue to monitor the extent of residential, commercial, and
industrial development on an annual basis. Sufficient detail should be
provided to monitor employment growth and housing production to
enhance jobs/housing balance in the City.
2008-2014 Objectives: As part of the City's annual report to State
Development of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for the
implementation of the General Plan (including Housing Element), provide
detailed progress in residential, commercial, and industrial development.
Funding Sources: Department/Division budget provided by General Fund
Responsible Agencies: Development Services Department/Planning
Division
EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY
24. Fair Housing Assistance
The City contracts with the Fair Housing Council of Orange County to
provide fair housing and tenant/landlord mediation services.
2008-2014 Objectives: Continue to provide fair housing services for all
residents of the City. Promote awareness of fair housing via the City's
website and distribute fair housing brochures at public counters and
community locations. Make fair housing brochures available to nonprofit
agencies. Recognize April as the "Fair Housing Month" and promote fair
housing events through public service announcements.
Funding Sources: CDBG
Responsible Agencies: City Manager/Housing and Community
Development Division; Fair Housing Council of Orange County;
Development Services Department/Planning Division
CHILD CARE FACILITIES
25. Promotion of Child Care Facilities
The City understands that finding adequate and convenient child care is
critical to maintaining the quality of life for Costa Mesa families. The City
currently allows large family day care facilities of up to 14 children in many
residential zones (R1, R2 -MD, R2 -HD, R3) as permitted uses. Day care
facilities of 15 or more children would require a conditional use permit in all
residential and commercial zones, but are considered as permitted uses in
the I&RS zone.
The City will continue to apply development incentives pursuant to the State
density bonus law and Costa Mesa Zoning Code to incorporate child care
centers as part of an affordable housing development. The City will allow
all incentives related to child care centers as afforded by the State density
bonus provisions.
�10
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
PAGE 30
The goals, objectives, and policies that address conservation of resources are as
follows:
GOAL CON -1:
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a high quality
environment through the conservation of resources, including land, water, wildlife,
and vegetation; the protection of areas of unique natural beauty the integration of
natural features into the man-made environment. [1990 GP Goal I — Modified for
2000 GP]
Objective CON -1A. Evaluate the preservation of the City's existing biotic resources
in as ecologically viable and natural a condition as possible, and, where feasible,
restore and integrate these resources into the urban environment. [1990 GP
Objective 1-131
CON -1A.1 Ensure that all future developments will be adequately reviewed with
regard to possible adverse effects on plant and animal life and
critical wildlife habitat and wetlands, and incorporate feasible
mitigation measures into the project design to reduce such effects.
[1990 GP Policy 15]
CON -1A.2 Encourage sustainable landscapes through landscape techniques
that conserve, recycle, and reuse valuable resources, including the
use of native vegetation and drought tolerant landscape materials
consistent with the City's landscaping standards set forth in Chapter
VII of Costa Mesa Zoning Code. [2000 GP Policy]
CON -1A.3 Continue to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Program by participating in the Countywide
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) which stipulates water
quality requirements for minimizing urban runoff and discharge from
new development and requires the provisions of applicable Best
Management Practices (BMP). [2000 GP Policy]
CON -1A.4 Continue to implement the Drainage Area Management Plan
(DAMP), and any amendments to it, that require site discharges to
reduce pollutants in runoff from new development and significant
redevelopment areas. [2000 GP Policy]
Objective CON -16. Work towards the protection and conservation of the City's
existing and future water resources recognizing water as a limited resource requiring
conservation. [1990 GP Objective I -D]
CON -1 B.1 Require, as a part of the environmental review procedure, an
analysis of major development or redevelopment project impacts on
local water supplies and water quality and an analysis of the impact
on water capacity and water availability. [1990 GP Policy 25 —
Modified for 2000 GP]
CON -113.2 Pursue the use of reclaimed wastewater for the irrigation of all
appropriate open space facilities and require new developments and
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 3t
City projects, and encourage existing developments to tie into the
reclaimed water system when recommended by the Orange County
Water District, Mesa Consolidated Water District, or Irvine Ranch
Water District. [1990 GP Policy 26 —Modified for 2000 GP]
CON -113.3 Cooperate with the Mesa Consolidated Water District and Irvine
Ranch Water District to advise the citizens of Costa Mesa of the
benefits which can be obtained from the practices of water
conservation. [1990 GP Policy 31 — Modified for 2000 GP]
CON -1 B.4 Prohibit the use of land for solid waste disposal dump sites in Costa
Mesa and work towards the prohibition of contiguous areas for dump
sites where there is possible ground water contamination. [New
Policy for 2000 GP]
Obiective CON -1C. Work towards the conservation of energy resources in both
existing and new buildings, utilities and infrastructure. [1990 GP Objective I -E —
Modified for 2000 GP]
CON -1C.1 Continue the program of replacing mercury vapor and other street
lights with high-pressure sodium vapor. [1990 GP Policy 36]
CON -11C.2 Apply the standards contained in Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations as applicable to the construction of all new dwelling
units. [1990 GP Policy 41]
CON -1C.3 Pursue adoption of an Energy Conservation Program that requires
the use of materials, devices, and measures to reduce energy
consumption above the energy conservation requirements of Title
24. These measures may include built-in energy efficient
appliances, automated controls for air conditioners and lighting,
special sunlight filtering window coatings or double -paned windows,
light-colored roofing materials, and other means to reduce energy
consumption and a structure's heating and cooling needs. [New
2000 GP Policy]
CON -1C.4 Continue to investigate the feasibility of municipal power programs.
[New 2000 GP Policy]
Objective CON -1D. Work towards the orderly, balanced utilization and conservation
of the City's coastal resources. [1990 GP Objective I -F]
CON -1 D.1 Coordinate City planning efforts with the County of Orange, the City
of Newport Beach, and other appropriate agencies to develop
uniform and consistent policies regarding the future use and
development of the River Park Project. [1990 GP Policy 43 —
Modified for 2000 GP]
CON -1D.2 Preserve and enhance existing wetlands areas. [1990 GP Policy 44]
CON -1 D.3 Review existing public works facility planning efforts to ensure that
adequate water, sewer, and circulation systems are available to
serve uses in the Coastal Zone and to limit planned capacities to
conform to the demands created by development which is consistent
with the Coastal Act. [1990 GP Policy 49]
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 32
CON -1 D.4 Require the provision of adequate visitor serving on-site parking
facilities that do not impact sensitive resources within the Coastal
Zone. [1990 GP Policy 46]
CON -1 D.5 Coordinate the development of plans, policies, and design standards
for projects within the Coastal Zone with appropriate local, regional,
state, and federal agencies. [1990 GP Policy 50]
Objective CON -11E. Pursue the prevention of the significant deterioration of local
and regional air and water quality. [1990 GP Objective II -B]
CON -1 E.1 Cooperate with and support regional, State, and Federal agencies to
improve air quality throughout the South Coast Air Basin. [1990 GP
Policy 80]
CON -1 E.2 Require, as a part of the environmental review procedure, an
analysis of major development or redevelopment project impacts on
local and regional air and water quality. [1990 GP Policy 83]
CON -1 E.3 Develop and implement a Reasonable Available Control Measure
Plan (including employee ridesharing, traffic signal synchronization,
bicycle/ pedestrian facilities, energy conservation street lighting,
modified work schedules, preferential carpool parking, or other
equivalent control measures) in conformance with the Air Quality
Management Plan for the South Coast Air Basin. [1990 GP Policy
87]
CON -1 E.4 Develop and implement comprehensive watershed management
plans for drainage basins in Costa Mesa. Closely coordinate with
the County, surrounding cities, and the various special districts
whose decisions and activities affect City and County watersheds
and other natural resources. [New 2000 GP Policy]
CON -1 E.5 Implement urban runoff pollution control measures and programs to
attempt to reduce and control the discharge of pollutants into storm
drains to the maximum extent practicable. [New 2000 GP Policy]
CON -1E.6 Reduce the quantity of runoff and discharge of pollutants to the
maximum extent practicable by integrating surface runoff controls
into new development and redevelopment land use decisions. [New
2000 GP Policy]
CON -1E.7 Support the acquisition of areas of open space that have water
quality significance by the City, County, State, or other agencies and
non-profit organizations for preservation. [New 2000 GP Policy]
CON -1 E.8 Coordinate with other local government agencies on county -wide
land use issues to maintain a watershed -based approach to land
use, flood control, and non -point source pollution prevention. [New
2000 GP Policy]
CON -1E.9 Ensure that land uses which pose a significant threat to water
quality, such as automobile dismantlers, transportation and vehicle
storage facilities, waste transfer disposal facilities, light industries,
and other uses that have a significant potential for pollution, shall not
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 33
provide storage to or discharge pollutants that could easily come in
contact with flood waters or high groundwater. [New 2000 GP Policy]
CON -1E.10 Minimize particulate matter pollution through control over
construction projects subject to the NPDES Stormwater Permit
(including erosion and sediment controls on grading, quarrying,
vegetation removal, construction and demolition), industrial
processes, parking lots, and other activities that pose such a water
quality threat. [New 2000 GP Policy]
CON -1E.11 Ensure development consistency with the National Community
Conservation Plan areas in Fairview Park and Talbert Regional Park.
[New 2000 GP Policy]
CON -1E.12 Ensure that new development/significant redevelopment projects
subject to the NPDES Stormwater Permit incorporate, to the
maximum extent practicable, measures that reduce the quantity of
storm flow and the discharge of pollutants in urban/storm water
runoff to protect water quality, biological habitats, and recreational
uses of downstream receiving water bodies. [New 2000 GP Policy]
CON -1E.13 Ensure that future land development/redevelopment projects subject
to the NPDES Stormwater Permit adhere to the design standards set
forth in the current Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and
the City's Local Implementation Plan. [New 2000 GP Policy]
NOISE ELEMENT
The goals, objectives and policies that address noise hazards and conditions are as
follows:
GOAL N-1:
NOISE HAZARDS AND CONDITIONS
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to protect its citizens and property from injury,
damage, or destruction from noise hazards and to work towards improved noise
abatement. [1990 GP Goal ll- Modified for 2000 GP]
Objective N -1A. Control noise levels within the City for the protection of residential
areas and other sensitive land uses from excessive and unhealthful noise. [1990 GP
Objective II -C]
N -1A.1 Require, as a part of the environmental review process, that full
consideration be given to the existing and projected noise
environment. [1990 GP Policy 90]
N -1A.2 The maximum acceptable exterior noise levels for residential areas
is 65 CNEL. [1990 GP Policy 91 – Modified for 2000 GP]
N -1A.3 Give full consideration to the existing and projected noise
environment when considering alterations to the City's circulation
system and Master Plan of Highways. [1990 GP Policy 92]
N -1A.4 Encourage Caltrans to construct noise attenuation barriers along
State freeways and highways adjoining residential and other noise
sensitive areas. [1990 GP Policy 93]
-W—
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 34
N -1A.5 Ensure that appropriate site design measures are incorporated into
residential developments, when required by an acoustical study, to
obtain appropriate exterior and interior noise levels. When
necessary, require field testing at the time of project completion to
demonstrate compliance. [1990 GP Policy 97]
N -1A.6 Apply the standards contained in Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations as applicable to the construction of all new dwelling
units. [1990 GP Policy 98]
N -1A.7 Discourage sensitive land uses from locating in the 65 CNEL noise
contour of the John Wayne Airport. Should it be deemed by the City
as appropriate and/or necessary for a sensitive land use to locate in
the 65 CNEL noise contour, ensure that appropriate interior noise
levels are met and that minimal outdoor activities are allowed. [1990
GP Policy 101]
N -1A.8 Support alternative methods for the reduction of noise impacts at
John Wayne Airport while continuing to maintain safety and existing
limitations on aircraft daily departures. [1990 GP Policy 105 —
Modified for 2000 GP]
SAFETY ELEMENT
The goals, objectives and policies that address safety concerns are as follows:
GOAL SAF1:
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MANMADE HAZARD PROTECTION
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to protect its citizens and property from injury,
damage, or destruction from environmental hazards, including hydrologic, geologic,
and climatic episodes, as well as from man-made hazards, including hazardous
materials. [1990 GP Goal II- Modified for 2000 GP]
Objective SAF -1A: Work towards the mitigation or prevention of potential adverse
consequences of natural disasters. [1990 GP Objective II -A]
SAF -1A.1 Consider geologic hazard constraints, impacts and mitigation when
developing land use policies and when making public decisions
relating to land development. [1990 GP Policy 64]
SAF -1A.2 Enforce standards, review criteria, and other methods to ensure that
structures on or adjacent to bluffs are set back sufficiently to
preserve the natural contour and aesthetic value of the bluff line and
to provide sufficient access for fire protection. [1990 GP Policy 65]
SAF -1A.3 Require geologic surveys of all new development located on or
adjacent to bluffs. [1990 GP Policy 66]
SAF -1A.4 Cooperate with local, State, and Federal flood control agencies to
reduce the potential for flood damage in the City of Costa Mesa.
[1990 GP Policy 69]
1 _� t _
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 35
SAF -1A.5 Identify and publicize the extent of geologic and seismic hazards
within Costa Mesa and advise affected residents and property
owners of appropriate protection measures. Offer information
regarding earthquake standards to reduce or eliminate structural
damage. [1990 GP Policy 73]
SAF -1A.6 Encourage, through technical assistance or development incentives,
private property owners to take adequate steps to protect their
property against seismic hazards. [1990 GP Policy 75]
SAF -1A.7 Require all proposed development projects to be designed to
minimize both the volume and velocity of surface runoff and permit
no adverse downstream impacts due to increased runoff through the
proper design of subsurface drains, appropriate grading, on-site
retention basins, landscape programs, or other appropriate
measures. [1990 GP Policy 77]
SAF -1A.8 Publicize the extent of flood hazards within Costa Mesa and advise
affected residents and property owners of appropriate protection
measures. Develop an education program, such as the Flood
Awareness Program, and emergency disaster plans for flooding.
[1990 GP Policy 78]
SAF -1 A.9 Encourage County, State, and Federal agencies to complete flood
control improvements to the Greenville -Banning Channel to protect
Costa Mesa residents and property located in the 100 -year flood
zone from a potential major disaster. [1990 GP Policy 79 — Modified
for 2000 GP]
Objective SAF -113: Participate in the safe, efficient and responsible management of
hazardous waste materials. [1990 Objective II -D]
SAF -1 B.1 Participate with the County of Orange in the implementation of the
Orange County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. [1990 GP
Policy 107]
SAF -1 B.2 Ensure that appropriate in-depth environmental analyses are
conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment,
transfer, and/or disposal facility. [1990 GP Policy 108]
SAF -1 B.3 Continue to work with the County of Orange to identify and inventory
all users of hazardous materials and all hazardous waste generators
and prepare clean-up action plans for identified disposal sites. [1990
GP Policy 110]
Fire and Police Services: Refer to Goal LU -3, Socio -Economic Considerations,
Objective LU -3A.3 and LU-3AA found in the Land Use Element.
Public Safety Through Design: Refer to Goal CD -14, Public Safety Through
Design, Objective CD -14, and Policies CD -14.1 through CD -14.3 found in the
Community Design Element.
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 36
OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ELEMENT
The goals, objectives, and policies of the Costa Mesa General Plan that address
recreation and open space are as follows:
GOAL OSR-1:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a high quality
environment through the development of recreation resources, and the preservation
of open space [1990 GP Goal I – Modified for 2000 GP]
Objective OSR-1A. Preserve the City's open space lands and provide additional
community and neighborhood parkland in conjunction with future population
increases to provide adequate recreational opportunities and relief from the
pressures of urban development. [1990 GP Objective I -A]
OSR-1A.1 Provide a minimum of 5.76 acres of permanent public open space
(consisting of 4.26 acres of neighborhood and community parks and
1.5 acres in school yards) for every 1,000 residents. [1990 GP
Policy 1]
OSR-1A.2 Provide maximum visibility and accessibility for future public parks by
locating such facilities adjacent to existing or planned public streets.
[1990 GP Policy 4]
OSR-1A.3 Encourage the acquisition of land for neighborhood or community
parks for active recreational use. [1990 GP Policy 5]
OSR-1A.4 To the extent legally possible, require other local, regional, State, or
Federal agencies to maintain an adequate inventory of open space
lands within Costa Mesa. [1990 GP Policy 6]
OSR-1A.5 Encourage, through development rights transfers or other incentives,
the development of private permanent open space, and recreation
facilities to meet the needs of the City's residents. [1990 GP Policy
8]
OSR-1A.6 Encourage, through open space easements, development rights
transfers or acquisition, zoning regulations, or other incentives, the
long-term maintenance of existing open space lands. [1990 GP
Policy 9]
OSR-1A.7 Require, through development standards and planned development
review criteria, the integration of open space uses (plazas,
courtyards, landscaped areas, etc.) into major commercial and
industrial development or redevelopment projects. [1990 GP Policy
10]
OSR-1A.8 Continue to require, through development standards, the integration
of open space and recreational uses and facilities into all multiple -
family residential projects. [1990 GP Policy 11]
OSR-1A.9 Review the possibility of incorporating an Arts in Public Places
program in City parks. [1990 GP Policy 121
--- -7 �3 —
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 37
OSR-1A.10 Strongly encourage improved maintenance of City and school district
facilities used for recreation and organized sports activities. Strongly
support recreation programs that benefit the youth of the community.
[1990 GP Policy 13]
OSR-1A.11 Retain all existing open space in Lions Park. [1990 GP Policy 14]
OSR-1A.12 Preserve and enhance existing wetlands areas. [1990 GP Policy 44]
OSR-1A.13 Encourage the preservation of views of coastal resources from City
and County parkland and public streets within Costa Mesa. [1990
GP Policy 53]
OSR-1A.14 Through continued implementation of the Parks, Recreation and
Open Space Master Plan, actively pursue the acquisition and
development of pocket and neighborhood parks within park deficient
areas. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
OSR-1A.15 Update the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan on a
regular basis. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
OSR-1A.16 Ensure that parks and recreation facilities are developed with
facilities appropriate to all ages, including athletic fields, active play
areas, passive open space, tot lots and picnic areas.
COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
Physical elements such as landscaping, architecture, signs, streets, open space, etc.,
collectively form Costa Mesa's visual environment and character. Through the
implementation of the Goals, Objectives, and Policies, the visual environment and
character of Costa Mesa will obtain the high level of quality desired by the City.
PUBLIC REALM FOCUS
GOAL CD -1:
VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS
Strengthen the image of the City as experienced from sidewalks and roadways.
[New Goal for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -1A. Contribute to City beautification by enhancing the visual
environment of Costa Mesa's vehicular and pedestrian corridors. [New Objective for
2000 GP]
CD -1A.1 Implement the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median
Development Standards in all new streetscape corridor and parkway
projects. Coordinate with new development adjacent to applicable
public rights-of-way to integrate landscape features and design
elements consistent with the streetscape standards and
recommendations. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -1A.2 Encourage the consolidation of compatible street furniture elements
(benches, bus shelters, newspaper racks, trash receptacles, kiosks,
etc.) whenever possible. Develop design standards and guidelines
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 38
for the placement of street furniture elements within and adjacent to
public rights-of-way to complement the specific recommendations
provided for streets in the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and
Median Development Standards. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -1A.3 Walls and fences should contribute to an attractive street and
sidewalk environment and compliment the style and character of the
local district and adjacent buildings. Newly constructed or
reconstructed walls and fences adjacent to sidewalks and roadways
should not run in a continuous plane, should incorporate architectural
treatments, such as masonry or wrought iron, and integrate tiered
plantings to soften their appearance. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -1A.4 Require a consistent landscape character along City streets to
reinforce the unique qualities of each corridor and district, including
the development of landscaped medians identified in Exhibit CD -5.
Support the implementation of the recommended street tree palette
for each City street, as identified in the City of Costa Mesa
Streetscape and Median Development Standards. [New Policy for
2000 GP]
CD -1A.5 Electric and communication lines should be placed underground, and
electrical substations and telephone facilities should be screened to
minimize visual impacts from sidewalks, streets, and adjacent
properties. Support utility undergrounding through conditions of
project approval, preparation of undergrounding plans, and the
formation of assessment districts. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -113. Encourage clear connections between districts within the City.
[New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -1 B.1 Promote linkages between separate districts through bike trails,
pedestrian paths, common medians or parkway landscaping in
connecting streets, and other physical improvements as necessary.
Through conditions of project approval, public improvement projects,
and other measures, support the development of new connections
and the enhancement of existing connections between districts.
[New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -2:
DISTRICTS
Enhance the existing character and strengthen the identity of Costa Mesa's districts.
[New Goal for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -2. Encourage future development and redevelopment to reinforce
district scale, identity, and urban form. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -2.1 Future development and redevelopment should improve the
environment for the public; it should support the distinctiveness of
each district as well as the special characteristics of the existing
fabric of its local context. Adopt urban design guidelines for each
identified district in Costa Mesa that recognizes, maintains, and
enhances the character and identity of each district; integrate
existing specific plans' policies and design guidelines as applicable.
[New Policy for 2000 GP]
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL CD -3:
NODES
PAGE 39
Heighten the design quality and visual interest of nodes within Costa Mesa. [New
Goal for 2000 GP]
Obiective CD -3. Create a sense of arrival to Costa Mesa and develop prominent
community focal points at key nodes within the City. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -3.1 Introduce entry monument signs and entry pole signs at key gateway
locations (i.e. nodes) in the City, as identified in Exhibit CD -3. Utilize
the standard design specifications for entry signs included in the City
of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Standards and
as illustrated in Exhibit CD -6. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -3.2 Reinforce a sense of arrival into the City by promoting architecturally
significant development and significant landscape plantings at key
nodes. Undertake a visioning process to develop specific design
guidelines that articulate the desired character for each key node
within Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -4:
LANDMARKS
Protect City landmarks. [New Goal for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -4. Promote the maintenance, use, and improvement of landmarks to
enhance the visual image and identity of Costa Mesa. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -4.1 Support efforts to preserve, maintain, and improve the condition of
Costa Mesa landmarks. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -5:
EDGES
Utilize Costa Mesa's edges as opportunities for enhancing the image of the City
along its boundaries. [New Goal for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -5. Develop and implement programs that preserve and enhance the
edges of Costa Mesa's. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -5.1 Preserve and optimize natural views and open spaces in Costa
Mesa. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -5.2 Control the visual impacts of new development on natural views of
the coast and the wetlands. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -5.3 Develop open space corridors and trails along the edges of Costa
Mesa where feasible. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -5.4 Continue to preserve natural open space, including restoration of the
natural area of Talbert Nature Reserve. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -5.5 Continue protection of Fairview Park as an open space and
recreation area. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
—7 o
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 40
CD -5.6 Work with Caltrans to improve the design quality of freeways. [New
Policy for 2000 GP]
PRIVATE PROPERTY FOCUS
GOAL CD -6:
IMAGE
Enhance opportunities for new development and redevelopment to contribute to a
positive visual image for the City of Costa Mesa. [New Goal for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -6. Establish development policies and design guidelines, which
contribute to an aesthetically pleasing and functional environment. [New Objective
for 2000 GP]
CD -6.1 Encourage the inclusion of art and aesthetically pleasing architecture
into new development and redevelopment that will have the effect of
perpetuating the image of the "City of the Arts". Adopt an incentive -
based design assistance program which allows business and
property owners to enhance the design quality of their property while
satisfying City image objectives. [1990 GP Policy 121 - Modified for
2000 GP]
CD -6.2 Encourage the use of creative and well-designed signs, which
establish a distinctive image for the City. Consider amending
existing sign regulations to include an incentive -based program to
encourage quality signage. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -6.3 Continue to work with Code Enforcement to ensure continued
maintenance of properties and compliance with adopted
development standards. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -7:
RESIDENTIAL
Promote and protect the unique identity of residential neighborhoods within Costa
Mesa. [New Goal for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -7A. Encourage excellence in architectural design. [New Objective for
2000 GP]
CD -7A.1 Ensure that new and remodeled structures are designed in
architectural styles which reflect the City's diversity, yet are
compatible in scale and character with existing buildings and the
natural surroundings within residential neighborhoods. Develop and
adopt design guidelines for residential development. [New Policy for
2000 GP]
CD -7A.2 Preserve the character and scale of Costa Mesa's established
residential neighborhoods; where residential development or
redevelopment is proposed, require as a condition of approval that it
is consistent with the prevailing character of existing development in
the immediate vicinity, and that it does not have a substantial
adverse impact on adjacent areas. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -8:
--- _� -7 —
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 41
COMMERCIAL
Achieve a high level of quality design for commercial uses. [New Goal for 2000 GP]
Obiective CD -8A. Encourage high level of architectural and site design quality.
[New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -8A.1 New and remodeled commercial structures and properties in Costa
Mesa should be designed to reflect the City's architectural diversity,
yet be compatible with nearby existing buildings' scale and
character. As a condition of approval, commercial uses should be
required to include interesting roof lines, building shapes, and
patterns of shade and shadow while demonstrating sensitivity to the
contextual influences of the surrounding area and compatibility with
surrounding neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -8A.2 High quality commercial architectural style in Costa Mesa is meant to
reinforce a positive sense of place and to respond to the
geographical location and climate of the area. Commercial
architectural design elements and materials that establish high
quality style, and should be integrated in new commercial
development, include the following:
Design Elements
♦ Simple, multi -planed pitched roofs
♦ Open rafters/tails with large overhangs
♦ The appearance of "thick" walls
Courtyards, arcades, intimate spaces
♦ Tile details
♦ Deep-set window and door openings
♦ Offset wall planes
Fountains and other unique details
♦ Building masses with the incorporation of one and two story
architecture
♦ Sequencing of enclosed space/arches
Design Materials
♦ Stucco, smooth, sand or light lace finish
Wood, as an exposed structural material
Clay or concrete roof tiles
♦ Native fieldstone
♦ Wood window casements
♦ Wood, as an accent material
♦ Brick, as an accent material
♦ Wrought iron (rust proof; anodized aluminum)
♦ Tile, as an accent material
♦ Slumpstone garden walls
[New Policy for 2000 GP]
---76-
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 42
CD -8A.3 Encourage the use of entrance patios, courtyards, plazas, arcades,
fountains, porches, tower elements, covered walks, and other
features in commercial areas. Pursue incentives for promoting
pedestrian amenities and significant design features in new and
redevelopment projects. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -8A.4 All areas not covered by structures, service yards, walkways,
driveways, and parking spaces shall be landscaped consistent with
the City's – Landscaping Standards contained in the Zoning Code.
Utilize landscaping to provide project amenities for new and
remodeled commercial uses, and to screen parking and equipment
areas. Landscaped areas should generally incorporate planting
utilizing a three tiered system: 1) grasses and ground covers, 2)
shrubs and vines, and 3) trees. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -8A.5 Arrange site access, parking, and circulation for commercial uses in
a logical, safe manner. Parking should not dominate the site in areas
adjacent to any street; should be concentrated in areas away from
the street, behind buildings and well landscaped; and, should be
designed with a clear hierarchy of circulation. Wherever possible,
parking lots should be divided into a series of connected smaller lots
utilizing raised landscape strips and raised walkways. Parking lots
should also include landscaping that accents the importance of
driveways from the street, frames the major circulation aisles, and
highlights pedestrian pathways. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -8A.6 Locate areas for outside equipment, trash receptacles, storage, and
loading areas in the least conspicuous part of the site. Utility and
mechanical equipment (e.g. electric and gas meters, electrical
panels, and junction boxes) should be concealed from view of public
streets, neighborhood properties, and nearby higher buildings. Trash
enclosures should be architecturally compatible with the project;
landscaping should be incorporated into the design of trash
enclosures to deter graffiti. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -8A.7 Decorative paving treatments are encouraged to be incorporated
throughout commercial developments, including driveway entries,
pedestrian walkways, plazas, and other areas. The design,
materials, and colors of decorative paving treatments (e.g. stamped
concrete, stone, brick or granite pavers, exposed aggregate, or
colored concrete) should compliment the architectural style of the
primary buildings and should make a positive contribution to the
aesthetic and function of the site. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -8A.8 All exterior lighting on commercial properties should be consistent
with the architectural style of the commercial building. On each
commercial site, all lighting fixtures should be from the same family
of fixtures with respect to design, materials, color, fixture, and color
of light. Lighting sources should be shielded, diffused or indirect to
avoid spillover on adjacent properties, nighttime sky light pollution,
and glare to pedestrians and motorists. To minimize the total
number of freestanding light standards, wall mounted lights should
be utilized to the greatest extent possible. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -8113. Preserve the scale and character of established neighborhoods
near commercial uses. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
— -7 "1
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 43
CD -8B.1 New commercial development or redevelopment should integrate
adequate site planning and design features to optimize compatibility
with adjacent residential neighborhoods. The following guidance
should be considered:
When adjacent residential and non-residential uses can mutually
benefit from connection, appropriate linkages (e.g. walkways,
common landscape areas, building orientation, and unfenced
property lines) are encouraged. Successful interaction between
commercial and residential uses may be achieved through
adequate setbacks, landscape buffers, screening, decorative
masonry walls, berms, building orientation, and limitations of
commercial activities.
Loading areas, access and circulation driveways, trash and
storage areas, and rooftop equipment should be located as far
as possible from adjacent residences.
Building orientation and landscaping of commercial buildings
should minimize a direct line of sight into adjacent residential
private open space.
[New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -9:
MIXED-USE
Provide opportunities to live, work, shop, and play in proximity to each other. [New
Goal for 2000 GP]
Obiective CD -9A. Design mixed use development projects to achieve a high quality
character. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -9A.1 Require that mixed-use development projects be designed to
mitigate potential conflicts between uses. Consider noise, lighting,
and security. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -9A.2 Provide adequate parking, open space and recreational facilities to
serve residents in mixed-use development projects. Site and design
parking and other areas to acknowledge different users (i.e.
residents versus shoppers) and to be compatible with the
architectural character of the building(s). [New Policy for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -9113. Provide for the development of projects that integrate housing
with commercial uses and other compatible uses. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -9B.1 Encourage mixed use development along the east side of Newport
Boulevard between Mesa Drive and Walnut Street. Establish
incentives for the development of projects in planned development
zones that integrate housing with retail and office uses. [New Policy
for 2000 GP]
CD -913.2 Support efforts to mix compatible uses and activities. Encourage the
siting of community -oriented services, businesses, and amenities in
OU
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL CD -10:
INDUSTRIAL
PAGE 44
and near mixed use neighborhoods, including schools, branch
libraries, open space and parks including "tot lots," and commercial
uses. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
Encourage the continuation of existing industrial uses and capitalize upon emerging
types of industries. [New Goal for 2000 GP]
Obiective CD -10A. Require that industrial and business park projects be of high
quality design standards. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -10A.1 Require that industrial projects be designed to convey visual interest
and a positive image. Architectural qualities and design elements for
industrial uses that are encouraged in Costa Mesa are:
♦ Building modulation indentations and architectural details;
♦ Building entry accentuation;
♦ Screening of equipment and storage areas; and
♦ Landscaping to soften building exteriors and to serve as a buffer
between uses.
[New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -10A.2 The design of industrial buildings should consider the visual and
physical relationship to adjacent uses. An industrial structure which
dominates its surrounding environment by its relative size shall
generally be discouraged. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -10A.3 Materials and colors should be used to produce diversity and visual
interest in industrial buildings. The use of various siding materials
(i.e. masonry, concrete texturing, cement or plaster) can produce
effects of texture and relief that provide architectural interest. [New
Policy for 2000 GP]
CD-10AA Consistent with the Zoning Code, landscaping should be used to
define areas such as entrances to industrial buildings and parking
lots, define the edges of developments, provide transition between
neighboring properties, and provide screening for outdoor storage,
loading and equipment areas. Landscaping should be in scale with
adjacent buildings and be of an appropriate size at maturity to
accomplish its intended purpose. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -10A.5 The design of lighting fixtures and their structural support should be
of a scale and architectural design compatible with on-site industrial
buildings. Large areas should be illuminated to minimize the visual
impact and amount of spillover light onto surrounding projects. [New
Policy for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -10B. Control the development of industrial projects to ensure they are
a positive addition to the City's community setting, and that they do not result in
adverse impacts with adjacent uses. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 45
CD -10.61 Require industrial projects to incorporate landscape setbacks,
screening walls and/or other elements that mitigate negative impacts
with adjacent uses. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -10.132 Protect transitional areas between industrial and other uses. Storage
yards, parking areas, and service areas should be screened from
public view. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -11:
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Promote preservation of the City's historically and architecturally significant buildings
and revitalization of traditional neighborhoods and commercial areas. [New Goal for
2000 GP]
Objective CD -11. Integrate historic preservation design practices into planning for
areas with historic significance. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -11.1 Enforce existing policies that protect historic and cultural resources
to deter the demolition of historically, architecturally and culturally
significant structures. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -11.2 Encourage the restoration and adaptive re -use of older commercial
structures which contribute to the sense of historic and cultural
identity of Costa Mesa. Support financial incentives, tax relief
programs, and flexibility in zoning regulations to promote historic
preservation and adaptive re -use of older commercial buildings.
[New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -11.3 As a condition of project approval, ensure that new development
respects Costa Mesa's heritage by requiring compatibility with
historic traditions and character, where applicable, of the local
context. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -12:
PUBLIC ART
Promote understanding and awareness of the visual arts by providing art in the public
environment. [New Goal for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -12. Generate appreciation for public art and promote involvement in
the community through public art programs. [New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -12.1 Develop a diverse public arts program that involves the entire
community and benefits the image of Costa Mesa. Adopt guidelines
to encourage the placement of public art within and adjacent to
public rights-of-way. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -13:
SIGNS
Ensure that signs contribute positively to Costa Mesa's image and overall economic
development. [New Goal for 2000 GP]
Objective CD -13. Facilitate the installation of signs that contribute to a positive
image of the public realm, consistent with the Costa Mesa Zoning Code. [New
Objective for 2000 GP]
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 46
CD -13.1 Encourage homeowners' associations and neighborhoods to
maintain existing housing tract entrance signs in an attractive
manner and encourage the placement of such signs at the entrance
of major developments which do not have such identification. [New
Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -13.2 Encourage the use of common design elements in signs for
commercial and industrial centers through the development of
planned sign programs to improve center identity by publicizing the
benefits of such programs to developers and local business
operators. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -13.3 Consider developing citywide sign design guidelines that promote
creativity and flexibility while upholding design quality. Design
guidelines could include the design and placement of business signs,
public street graphics, street signs, locational and directional signs,
traffic signs, etc. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -13.4 Introduce distinctive signage, including the entry signage system
contained within the Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median
Development Standards, which effectively announces arrival to the
City, unique districts, neighborhoods, and public buildings and parks.
[New Policy for 2000 GP]
GOAL CD -14:
PUBLIC SAFETY THROUGH DESIGN
Create a safe place to live, work, and play for Costa Mesa residents. [New Goal for
2000 GP]
Objective CD -14. Incorporate public safety considerations into community design.
[New Objective for 2000 GP]
CD -14.1 Decrease the opportunity for criminal activity by addressing high risk
circumstances (i.e., a dark alley, an enclosed stairwell, and dark
entrances). Involve the Police and Fire Department in reviewing and
making design recommendations during the project review period.
[New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -14.2 Continue to implement and refine development standards and/or
guidelines based on Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design (CPTED) for new development and redevelopment with
emphasis on site and building design to minimize vulnerability to
criminal activity. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
CD -14.3 Continue to provide CPTED training to City staff and local planning
and design professionals to optimize public safety through
community design. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
The goals, objectives and policies that address Historic and Cultural Resources
Element are as follows:
&3
2000 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 47
GOAL HCR -1:
HISTORIC RESOURCE CONSERVATION
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a high quality
environment through the protection and conservation of historic and cultural
resources the preservation of open space.[1990 GP Goal I — Modified for 2000 GP]
Obiective HCR -1A. Encourage the preservation and protection of the City's natural
and man-made historic resources. [1990 GP Objective I -C]
HCR -1A.1 Require, as part of the environmental review procedure, an evaluation of
the significance of paleontological, archaeological, and historical
resources and the impact of proposed development on those resources.
[1990 GP Policy 17]
HCR -1A.2 Require monitoring of grading operations by a qualified paleontologist or
archaeologist when the site is reasonably suspected of containing such
resources. If, as a result, evidence of resources is found, require the
property to be made available for a reasonable period of time for salvage
of known paleontological and archaeological resources by qualified
experts, organizations, or educational institutions. [1990 GP Policy 18]
HCR -1A.3 Require development on land containing known archaeological
resources to use reasonable care to locate structures, paving,
landscaping, and fill dirt in such a way as to preserve these resources
undamaged for future generations when it is the recommendation of a
qualified archaeologist that said resources be preserved in situ. [1990
GP Policy 19]
HCR -1A.4 Encourage the preservation of significant historic resources as identified
on Table HCR -1 by developing and implementing incentives such as
building and planning application permit fee waivers, Mills Act contracts,
grants and loans, implementing the State Historic Building Code and
other incentives as identified in the City's Historic Preservation
Ordinance. [New Policy for 2000 GP]
HCR -1A.5 Promote the preservation of significant historical resources and
encourage other public agencies or private organizations to assist in the
purchase and/or relocation of sites, buildings, and structures deemed to
be of historical significance. [1990 GP Policy 22]
HCR -1A.6 Encourage development of an interpretive center for paleontological,
archaeological, and historical resources at Fairview Park. The center
may contain resources found in the park area as well as resources found
throughout the City. [1990 GP Policy 24]
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13r' Edition)
Page 36
Costa Mesa
Appendix B
Housing Successor Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2014-2015
95,
COSTA MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT
AS HOUSING AUTHORITY AND
AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015
UNDER CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE
SECTIONS 34176.1 AND 34328
This Annual Report of the Costa Mesa Housing Authority (CMHA) is prepared pursuant
to the California Health and Safety Code (HSC), Section 34176.1 as the housing
successor, and Section 34328 as a housing authority (together, HSC Report). In
particular, Division 24 of the HSC sets forth the Dissolution Law in Parts 1.8 and 1.85 and
the Housing Authorities Law in Part 2, which respectively require preparation of an annual
report on housing successor and the housing authority's activities for the prior fiscal year.
This Report details the CMHA's activities during Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-2015 and is
intended to satisfy the requirements under both HSC Sections 34328 and 34176.1.
In particular this Report details the CMHA's activities for FY 2014-2015, including the
information required about the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF)
and on other information pursuant to Section 34176.1(f). After receipt of the complete,
final CAFR (term defined below) that is expected by the end of December 2015, then this
Report will be finalized using information and data in the CAFR and will be provided to,
and will be presented for joint consideration and action by the City Council Housing
Authority Board in January 2016.
The Report includes information prepared by City staff on behalf of the CMHA and
information contained within the independent financial audit of the Low and Moderate
Income Housing Asset Fund Financial Report for FY 2014-2015 (CA F R) as prepared
by White Nelson Diehl Evans LLP, which audit is separate from this Report; further, this
Report conforms with and is organized into sections I. through XIII., inclusive, pursuant
to Section 34176.1(f) of the Dissolution Law.-
Amounts
aw:
Amounts Received and Deposited Pursuant to 34191.4(b)(3)(A). This section
provides the total amount of funds paid to the City and the amount deposited into
the LMIHAF allocable to 20% of the repayments on the reinstated City/Agency
loan per Section 34191.4.
II. Amount Deposited into LMIHAF. This section provides the total amount of funds
deposited into the LMIHAF in FY 14-15 and itemized by amounts deposited in FY
14-15 for items listed on Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS),
amounts allocable to Section 34191.4 deposits, and other amounts deposited into
the LMIHAF.
III. Ending Balance of LMIHAF. This section provides a statement of the balance in
the LMIHAF as of the close of FY 14-15. Any amounts deposited for items listed
on the ROPS, and amounts allocable to Section 34191.4 deposits, must be
distinguished from the other amounts deposited.
IV. Description of Expenditures from LMIHAF. This section provides a description
of expenditures made from the LMIHAF during FY 14-15. The expenditures are
to be categorized among (A) administration for monitoring, preserving covenanted
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15
Page 11
housing units, (B) homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services and
(C) development of housing.
V. Statutory Value of Assets Owned by Housing Successor. This section
provides the statutory value of real property owned by the Housing Successor,
the value of loans and grant receivables, and the sum of these two amounts.
VI. Description of Transfers. This section describes transfers, if any, to another
housing successor agency made in previous Fiscal Year(s), including whether the
funds are unencumbered and the status of projects, if any, for which the
transferred LMIHAF will be used. The sole purpose of the transfers must be for
development of transit priority projects, permanent supportive housing, housing
for agricultural employees or special needs housing.
VII. Project Descriptions. This section describes any project for which the Housing
Successor receives or holds property tax revenue pursuant to the ROPS and the
status of that project.
VIII. Status of Compliance with Section 33334.16. As and if applicable, this section
provides a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16 for interests in real
property acquired by the former redevelopment agency prior to February 1, 2012.
For interests in real property acquired on or after February 1, 2012, provide a
status update on the project.
IX. Description of Outstanding Obligations under Section 33413. This section
describes outstanding inclusionary and replacement housing obligations, if any,
under Section 33413 that remained outstanding prior to dissolution of the former
redevelopment agency as of February 1, 2012, along with the Housing
Successor's progress in meeting those prior obligations, if any, of the former
redevelopment agency and how the Housing Successor's plans to meet unmet
obligations, if any.
X. Income Test. This section provides information required by Section
34176.1(a)(3)(B), or a description of expenditures by income restriction for five
year period, with the time period beginning January 1, 2014 and whether the
statutory thresholds have been met. However, reporting of the Income Test is not
required until 2019.
XI. Senior Housing Test. This section provides the percentage of units of deed -
restricted rental housing restricted to seniors and assisted individually or jointly by
the Housing Successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction
within the previous 10 years in relation to the aggregate number of units of deed -
restricted rental housing assisted individually or jointly by the Housing Successor,
its former redevelopment agency and its host jurisdiction within the same time
period. For this Report the ten-year period reviewed is January 1, 2004 to January
1, 2014, and for the first six months of the next ten-year period of January 1, 2014
to January 1, 2024.
XII. Excess Surplus Test: This section provides the amount of excess surplus in the
LMIHAF, if any, and the length of time that the Housing Successor has had excess
surplus, and the Housing Successor's plan for eliminating the excess surplus.
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15
—S-7—
Page 12
XIII. Inventory of Homeownership Units: This section provides a summary of
covenanted homeownership units assisted by the former redevelopment agency
or the housing successor that include an equity sharing and repayment
provisions, including: (A) number of units; (B) number of units lost to the portfolio
in the last fiscal year and the reason for those losses, and (C) any funds returned
to the housing successor pursuant to losses or repayments.
This Report is to be provided to CMHA and its governing body, the City Council, in
accordance with the Dissolution Law and the HAL. In addition, this Report and the former
Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency's (former Agency) pre -dissolution Implementation
Plan are available to the public on the City's website (www. costa mesaca.gov).
I. AMOUNTS RECEIVED AND DEPOSITED PURSUANT TO 34191.4(B)(3)(A)
In FY 14-15, a total of $359,675 was approved by DOF and remitted via ROPS 14-15A
and attributable to the reinstated City/Agency loan under Section 34191.4; and, of that
figure, $287,740 (allocable to 80% of $359,675) was paid to the City, and $71,935 was
deposited into the LMIHAF (allocable to 20% of $359,675).
AMOUNTS DEPOSITED INTO LMIHAF
• The amount of $71,935 was deposited into the LMIHAF in FY -15 allocable to the
20% of the monies received by the City in repayment of the reinstated
City/Agency loan per Section 34191.4; plus
• $0 was held for items listed on the ROPS; plus
• Other deposits into the LMIHAF in FY 14-15 of: (1) $78,550 rental income,
(2) $568,143 loan repayments, and (3) $4,964 investment income.
In sum, the cumulative total is $723,592 of all deposits into the LMIHAF during FY 14-15.
Ill. ENDING BALANCE OF LMIHAF
At the close of FY 14-15, the ending balance in the LMIHAF was $912,240, of which $0
is held for items listed on the ROPS.
IV. DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURES FROM LMIHAF
The table below lists and describes expenditures from LMIHAF by category for FY 14-
15:
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15
orb M%
Page 13
Fiscal Year 14-15
MONITORING, ENFORCEMENT AND
$124,772
Monitoring and
PRESERVING THE LONG TERM
Administration
AFFORDABLE HOUSING COVENANTS
Expenditures
IMPOSED BY THE FORMER AGENCY OR
CMHA AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR AND
COSTS TO ADMINISTER HOMELESS
PREVENTION AND RAPID REHOUSING
SUPPORTIVE SERVICES, AND TOWARD
DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION OF
HOUSING
Homeless Prevention
MONITORING, ENFORCEMENT AND
$60,468
and Rapid Rehousing
PRESERVING THE LONG TERM
Services Expenditures
AFFORDABLE HOUSING COVENANTS
IMPOSED BY THE FORMER AGENCY OR
CMHA AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR AND
COSTS TO ADMINISTER HOMELESS
PREVENTION AND RAPID REHOUSING
SUPPORTIVE SERVICES, AND TOWARD
DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION OF
HOUSING
Housing Development
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND
$26,941
Expenditures
PRESERVATION OF EXISTING LOW AND
VERY LOW INCOME RENTAL HOUSING
UNITS AT RISK OF CONVERSION TO
MARKET RATE CCBHC Projects
Total
Total
LMIHAF Expenditures
$212,181
in FY 14-15
V. STATUTORY VALUE OF ASSETS OWNED BY HOUSING SUCCESSOR IN LMIHAF
Under the Dissolution Law and for purposes of this Report, the "statutory value of real
property" means the value of properties formerly held by the former redevelopment
agency as listed on the housing asset transfer schedule approved by the Department of
Finance as listed in such schedule under Section 34176(a)(2), the value of the
properties transferred to the Housing Successor pursuant to Section 34181(f), and the
purchase price of property(ies) purchased by the Housing Successor. Further, the value
of loans and grants receivable is included in these reported assets held in the LMIHAF.
The following table provides the statutory value of assets owned by the Housing
Successor as of the end of FY 14-15:
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15
Page 14
VI. DESCRIPTION OF TRANSFERS
The Housing Successor did not make any LMIHAF transfers to other Housing
Successor(s) under Section 34176.1(c)(2) during FY 14-15.
VII. APPROVED ROPS PROJECTS
The Housing Successor does not receive or hold property tax revenue under a ROPS.
VIII. STATUS OF COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 33334.16
Section 34176.1 provides that Section 33334.16 does not apply to interests in real
property acquired by the Housing Successor on or after February 1, 2012.
With respect to interests in real property acquired by the former Agency prior to
February 1, 2012, the time periods described in Section 33334.16 shall be deemed to
have commenced on the date that the Department of Finance approved the property as
a housing asset in the LMIHAF; thus, as to real property acquired by the former
redevelopment agency now held by the Housing Successor in the LMIHAF, the Housing
Successor must initiate activities consistent with development of the real property for
the purpose for which it was acquired within five years of the date the DOF approved
such property as a housing asset.
In this regard, the CMHA, as housing successor, did not own any real property as of
dissolution on February 1, 2012.
IX. DESCRIPTION OF OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 33413
Replacement Housing: According to the March 2010 Implementation Plan for the
former redevelopment agency, in Section 33413(a) replacement housing obligations
were transferred to the Housing Successor; however, the former Agency had no
outstanding replacement housing obligations as of dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15
q()'
Page 15
As of End of FY 14-15
Cash and Investments
$930,738
Interest Receivable
$ 1,346
Statutory Value of Real Property Owned by
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
$ 0
Value of Loans and Grants Receivable
$3,627,094
Total Value
$4,559,178
VI. DESCRIPTION OF TRANSFERS
The Housing Successor did not make any LMIHAF transfers to other Housing
Successor(s) under Section 34176.1(c)(2) during FY 14-15.
VII. APPROVED ROPS PROJECTS
The Housing Successor does not receive or hold property tax revenue under a ROPS.
VIII. STATUS OF COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 33334.16
Section 34176.1 provides that Section 33334.16 does not apply to interests in real
property acquired by the Housing Successor on or after February 1, 2012.
With respect to interests in real property acquired by the former Agency prior to
February 1, 2012, the time periods described in Section 33334.16 shall be deemed to
have commenced on the date that the Department of Finance approved the property as
a housing asset in the LMIHAF; thus, as to real property acquired by the former
redevelopment agency now held by the Housing Successor in the LMIHAF, the Housing
Successor must initiate activities consistent with development of the real property for
the purpose for which it was acquired within five years of the date the DOF approved
such property as a housing asset.
In this regard, the CMHA, as housing successor, did not own any real property as of
dissolution on February 1, 2012.
IX. DESCRIPTION OF OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 33413
Replacement Housing: According to the March 2010 Implementation Plan for the
former redevelopment agency, in Section 33413(a) replacement housing obligations
were transferred to the Housing Successor; however, the former Agency had no
outstanding replacement housing obligations as of dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15
q()'
Page 15
Inclusionary/Production Housing. According to the March 2010 Implementation Plan
for the former redevelopment agency, in Section 33413(b) inclusionary/production
housing obligations were transferred to the Housing Successor; however, the former
Agency had no outstanding inclusionary/production housing obligations as of dissolution
on February 1, 2012. The former redevelopment agency's Implementation Plan for the
former Downtown Project Area is posted on the City's website at
(www. costamesaca. gov).
Therefore, the Housing Successor has no outstanding replacement or
inclusionary/production housing obligations.
The former Agency's Implementation Plan is posted on the City's website at
(www.costamesaca. gov).
X. EXTREMELY -LOW INCOME TEST
Section 34176.1(a)(3)(B) requires that the Housing Successor must require at least 30%
of the LMIHAF to be expended for development of rental housing affordable to and
occupied by households earning 30% or less of the AMI. If the Housing Successor fails
to comply with the Extremely -Low Income requirement in any five-year report, then the
Housing Successor must ensure that at least 50% of the funds remaining in the LMIHAF
be expended in each fiscal year following the latest fiscal year following the report on
households earning 30% or less of the AMI until the Housing Successor demonstrates
compliance with the Extremely -Low Income requirement. This information is not required
to be reported until 2019 for the 2014 — 2019 period.
XI. SENIOR HOUSING TEST
The Housing Successor is to calculate the percentage of units of deed -restricted rental
housing restricted to seniors and assisted by the Housing Successor, the former
redevelopment agency and/or the City within the previous 10 years in relation to the
aggregate number of units of deed -restricted rental housing assisted by the Housing
Successor, the former redevelopment agency and/or City within the same time period.
If this percentage exceeds 50%, then the Housing Successor cannot expend future funds
in the LMIHAF to assist additional senior housing units until the Housing Successor or
City assists and construction has commenced on a number of restricted rental units that
is equal to 50% of the total amount of deed -restricted rental units.
The Housing Successor's Senior Housing Test for the 10 year period of January 1, 2004
to January 1, 2014 (six months of FY 14-15 for this Report) evidences that 9.8% of the
funds were expended on assistance to provide senior affordable housing units and 90.2%
of the funds were expended on assistance to provide non-senior/family affordable
housing units. In particular, 36 senior units with long-term 55 -year affordability covenants
were established during the subject 10 -year period (specifically, the St. John's Manor
Project).
For the current 10 -year period of January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2024, the CMHA $0
funds, therefore 0% of funds were expended on development or assistance to develop
senior or non-senior/family units.
XII. EXCESS SURPLUS TEST
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15
Page i6
The term excess surplus is defined as: "an unencumbered amount in the [LMIHAF] account
that exceeds the greater of one million dollars ($1,000,000) or the aggregate amount
deposited into the account during the housing successor's preceding four fiscal years,
whichever is greater." For this Report presenting information about FY 14-15, the preceding
four fiscal years were FY 13 14, FY 12-13, FY 11-12, and 10-11; however, the housing
successor did not yet exist in FY 10-11 and came into existence on and has existed since
February 1, 2012, so the housing successor has not yet existed for four preceding fiscal
years.
In any event, the LMIHAF does not have an Excess Surplus,
XII. INVENTORY OF HOMEOWNERSHIP UNITS.
This section provides an inventory of homeownership units assisted by the former
redevelopment agency and assumed by the CMHA, as housing successor, that are subject
to covenants or restrictions or to an adopted program that protects the former
redevelopment agency's investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund per Section 33334.3(f).
This inventory includes:
(A) The total number of homeownership units assisted by the former redevelopment agency
is 41 units, which includes loans and restricted single-family homes assisted by the
former redevelopment agency through its (1) First Time Homebuyer Program, (2)
Single -Family Rehabilitation Program, (3) affordable housing projects with Habitat for
Humanity of Orange County, and (4) the Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
(B) The total number of homeownership units lost to the CMHA/Housing Successor's
portfolio between February 1, 2012 up to June 30, 2015, along with the reason or
reasons for those losses.
Total losses between February 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015: 27 units
Reason for loss from homeownership portfolio of each such unit.-
(Such
nit:[Such as foreclosure, loan repayments, etc.]
Principal Repayments: $ 285,816.11
Loan Impairment: $1,095,000.00
Foreclosure: $ 436,000.00
Funds returned to the CMHA/Housing Successor as part of an adopted program that
protects the former Agency's investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund. This includes repayments of all such loans including principal, interest,
and equity sharing payments between February 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015.
$ 301,584.00 (Principal, interest and fees)
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15 P a g e 1 7
-q2. --
(C) The number of homeownership units lost to the CMHA/Housing Successor's portfolio in
FY 14-15 and the reason for those losses.
Total losses to portfolio in FY 14-15 10 units
Reason for loss from homeownership portfolio in FY 14-15 of each such unit:
[Such as foreclosure, loan repayments, etc.]
Principal Repayments: $51,434.00
Funds returned to the CMHA/Housing Successor as part of an adopted program that
protects the former Agency's investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund. This includes repayments of all SF Rehab and FTHB loans including
principal, interest, and equity sharing payments during FY 2014-15: $
66,643.00 (Principal, interest and fees).
(D) The CMHA/Housing Successor does have existing consulting agreements with:
Amerinational Community Services, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation and Farmers State
Bank of Hartland, a Minnesota corporation relating to certain, but not all, aspects of
administration of the former Agency's Single Family Rehabilitation Program and First
Time Homebuyer program (FTHB) that provided second lien mortgages for
homeownership units. These consulting services include assistance with oversight and
administration of amortized loan payments, if any, due; with tracking and calculation of
loan balances in the event of payoff; and, other administrative activities for these
outstanding SF Rehab and FTHB loans. In addition, the CMHA retains the services of
Keyser Marston Associates, a professional housing economic consultant, and the
CMHA legal counsel, Celeste Brady of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, assists staff
in review of legal issues related to the outstanding SF Rehab and FTHB loans, such as
and including relating to refinancing of first lien mortgages so long as consistent with
the SF Rehab and FTHB program refinancing criteria, repayments, impairment
analyses, defaults, foreclosures, bankruptcies, renting out part of the home, short sale
requests, and other issues that arise in the administration of the former Agency's loan
programs for ownership housing.
XIII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT CMHA'S ACTIVITIES FOR THE
PRECEDING YEAR FY 14-15 PER HSC SECTION 34328
Without repeating the information presented above in this report, the CMHA.
(1) continued to monitor and enforce the housing assets transferred from the former
redevelopment agency to the CMHA as housing successor;
(2) proceeded with non -judicial foreclosure proceedings initiated by the City of
Costa Mesa and the Housing Authority that were pending during FY 14-15. Trustee
sales by auction were held (after June 30, 2015 but within the 60 -day reporting in the
CAFR) on August 28, 2015 at the Santa Ana Superior Court for three (of the four)
affordable housing projects that had been owned and operated by Civic Center Barrio
Housing Corporation ("CCBHC"), including:
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15
-G3-
Page 18
(a) 707, 711 W. 18th St., 8 units in two 4-plexes; 8 Low Income units; former
redevelopment agency, now a Housing Authority loan, with successful credit bid of
$753,471.87.
(b) 734, 740, 744 James St., 11 units in one 3-plex and two 4-plexes; 9 Low and 2
Very Low Income units; City loan with successful credit bid of $1,180,026.24;
(c) 745 W. 18th St., 3 units in one 3-plex; 3 Very Low Income units; City loan with
successful credit bid of $450,563.65; and
(d) proceedings were initiated in FY 14-15 but have not to date been concluded
relating to 8 Very Low Income affordable rental units located at 717, 721 James Street,
Costa Mesa, adjacent to the above -listed units.
All 22 of the affordable rental units acquired through the foreclosure proceedings, (a) to
(c) above, have been vested with the Costa Mesa Housing Authority and more detail
will be provided in next year's annual report regarding FY 15-16. It is anticipated that
the Trustee's sale on the 8 units at 717, 721 James Street will occur in early 2016.
During FY 14-15, the owner of the Costa Mesa Village SRO project, an existing
affordable housing project for which the former redevelopment agency provided a
deferred, subordinate loan of $500,000, refinanced the first lien permanent loan so the
CMHA's subordinate loan was due and fully repaid; however, it is noted the Regulatory
Agreement of record against the property remains in place and by its terms in effect in
perpetuity. A portion of the repayment proceeds were allocable to federal CDBG funds
so were remitted to the City and the balance deposited into the LMIHAF.
As housing successor and pursuant to Section 34176.1(a)(2), the Housing Authority
may expend up to $250,000 per fiscal year "for homeless prevention and rapid
rehousing services for individuals and families who are homeless or would be homeless
but for this assistance, including the provision of short-term or medium-term rental
assistance, housing relocation and stabilization services including housing search,
mediation, or outreach to property owners, credit repair, security or utility deposits, utility
payments, rental assistance for a final month at a location, moving cost assistance, and
case management, or other appropriate activities for homelessness prevention and
rapid rehousing of persons who have become homeless." In this regard in FY 14-15
and as detailed in this Report, the Housing Authority provided partial funding for
Community Outreach Workers who assertively work toward placing homeless
individuals and families into temporary or permanent housing as it becomes available.
The part-time staff addresses the various needs represented by our homeless
population on a daily basis. Further, a part-time Management Analyst maintains the
database that Community Outreach Workers and volunteers from varied community
groups utilize to streamline their reporting and recordkeeping processes relative to
placement of homeless individuals and families into housing.
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 14-15
_qq_
Page 19