Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - CC-5 - Additional Documents - 9/6/2016ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR CC -5 From: SHELTON, KELLY Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 4:06 PM To: GREEN, BRENDA; TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Jack Hammett field project - consent calendar #5 -----Original Message ----- From: AL MELONE [mailto:amelone@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 3:58 PM To: MENSINGER, STEPHEN <STEPHEN.MENS INGER@costamesaca.gov>; RIGHEIMER, JIM <JIM.RIG HEIMER@costamesaca.gov>; MONAHAN, GARY <GARY.MONAHAN@costamesaca.gov>; FOLEY, KATRINA <KATRINA.FOLEY@costamesaca.gov>; GENIS, SANDRA <SANDRA.GENIS@costamesaca.gov> Cc: HATCH, THOMAS <THOMAS.HATCH@costamesaca.gov> Subject: Jack Hammett field project - consent calendar #5 Dear Council members, It appears this item is a done deal. But I would still like to put in my two cents. As hard as it is to turn down free money, this city cannot afford this artificial turf project, in my opinion. I can understand that no politician wants to be put in a position appearing to be the Grinch who stole Christmas (before youth sports activists.) But please consider the following: 1. At some point in time, maybe 10 years or so, replacement. (If ignored for too long, it may become a hazard.) that artificial turf will become worn out and need 2. What if the economy 10 years from now is not so great? That future council will have then inherited a PROBLEM. (From you folks) 3. If at that point they feel compelled to go back to grass, they still have to relocate that worn out plastic to a landfill (lousy ecology) and then wait 12-18 months for the new sod to get what they call "established" such that it can bear heavy sports traffic. Which would mean shutting down that field for a year or more. Ouch! 4. As a practical matter, you are locking in future councils to a larger operating "nut." Whatever annual savings are achieved will be more than offset by each 10 year balloon. Al Melone CC -10 Biennial Review of City's Conflict of Interest Code Revised to add the Senior Commission. NOTE: The following positions are not included in the Conflict of Interest Code as they already must file pursuant to Government Code Section 87200: Council Members Planning Commissioners City Manager City Attorney City Treasurer ATTACHMENT B APPENDIX A The term "Designated" refers to employees or officials, set forth by position or job classifications. A designated employee or official, for the purpose of this resolution, and in compliance with the City's Conflict of Interest Code (Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 2-401, et al) shall include a spouse and immediate members of the family. Any person hired or promoted into a job classification included in this resolution shall become a designated employee for the purpose of the City's conflict of Interest Code without further action of the City Council. Added positions are highlighted. DEPARTMENT/POSITION TITLES REPORTING CATEGORY 4:100"M WIMIUM Assistant Chief Executive Officer All Management Analyst All City Clerk All Public Affairs Manager All Human Resources Manager All Human Resources Analyst All Principal Human Resources Analyst All Central Services Supervisor All Public Information Officer All Assistant Recreation Supervisor All Deputy City Clerk All City Attorney's Office Assistant City Attorney All Deputy City Attorney All Development Services Department Economic & Development Services Director All Economic Development Director All Development Service Director All Assistant Development Services Director All Principal Planner All Senior Planner All Associate Planner All Assistant Planner All Building Official All Building Inspector All Senior Electrical Inspector All Senior Plumbing/Mechanical Inspector All Chief Plans Examiner All Plan Checker (consultant) All Code Enforcement Officer 1 &4 Plan Checker All Chief of Inspection All Chief of Code Enforcement All Building Technician I & II All Combination Building Inspector All Plan Check Engineer All Plan Review Consultants All V.2 9/6/16 Management Analyst All Permit Processing Specialist All CDBG/HOME Coordinator All Senior Combo Inspector All Zoning Administrator All Senior Code Enforcement Officer 1 & 4 Community Improvement Manager All Finance Department All Assistant Finance Director All Budget Research Officer All Accounting Supervisor All Purchasing Supervisor All Buyer All Revenue Supervisor All Tax Auditing Specialist 1 &4 Management Analyst All Budget Analyst All Recreation Manager All Senior Center Program Administrator All Management Analyst All Recreation Supervisor All Assistant Recreation Supervisor All Police Chief All Police Captain All Police Administrative Services Commander All Public Affairs Manager All Management Analyst All Fire Chief All Deputy Chief All Battalion Chief All Management Analyst All Fire Protection Analyst All Information Technology Director All Systems & Programming Supervisor All Operations & Network Supervisor All Telesemmunisations Manager All Director of Public Services All City Engineer All Senior Engineer All Transportation Services Manager All V.2 9/6/16 Construction Inspector All Chief Construction Inspector All Assistant Engineer All Associate Engineer All Maintenance Services Manager All Facilities and Equipment Supervisor All Contract Administrator All Maintenance Superintendent All Management Analyst All Senior Commission R NOTE: The following positions are not included in the Conflict of Interest Code as they already must file pursuant to Government Code Section 87200: Council Members Planning Commissioners City Manager City Attorney City Treasurer V.2 9/6/16 CITY COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 ITEM NUMBER: PH -1 SUBJECT: NORTH COSTA MESA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (SP -16-01) RELATED TO HOME RANCH SITE, 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS AND SAKIOKA LOT 2 DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 FROM: PLANNING DIVISION/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION BY: MINOO ASHABI, PRINCIPAL PLANNER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MINOO ASHABI (714) 754-5610 minoo.ashabi@costamesaca.gov Two (2) resolutions are presented to the City Council as part of this action. One resolution recommends approval of an addendum for Final EIR No. 1054 and amendment to the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan related to the property located at 3350 Avenue of the Arts. The second resolution would allow for amendment to the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan related to the Home Ranch Site and Sakioka Lot 2. MINOO ASHABI, AIA GARY ARMSTRONG, AICP Principal Planner Economic Development & Development Services Director / Deputy CEO Attachments: 1. Draft City Council Resolutions cc: Justin McCusker C.J. Segerstrom & Sons 3315 Fairview Road Costa Mesa, CA 92626 George Sakioka 14850 Sunflower Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92707George Sakioka Judy Wang Wincome Group 888 Disneyland Dr I Suite 100 Anaheim, CA 92802 Paul Sanford, Rosanna Inc. 3350 Avenue of the Arts Costa Mesa, CA 92626 RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 1054 (STATE CLEARING HOUSE NUMBER 2007011125) AND AMENDMENT TO NORTH COSTA MESA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP -16-01) RELATED TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the 2015-2035 General Plan on June 21, 2016; WHEREAS, the General Plan is a long-range, comprehensive document that serves as a guide for the orderly development of Costa Mesa; WHEREAS, by its very nature, the General Plan needs to be updated and refined to account for current and future community needs; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan by Resolution No. 94-67 in July 1994 to provide additional planning guidelines and standards for several large development areas located in north Costa Mesa; WHEREAS, within the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, General Plan 2015-2035 allowed an increase in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for Home Ranch site, an increase in the residential density for Sakioka Lot 2, and development flexibility for 3350 Avenue of the Arts within the trip budgets adopted by the Land Use and Circulation Elements; WHEREAS, the amendments promote diversity of development options at 3350 Avenue of The Arts are in conformance with the objectives of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and General Plan, including the following: • North Costa Mesa Specific Plan - Recognize the development potential of the planning area and the need to sensitively integrate new development with the surrounding areas, and therefore, promote both resident and business community confidence in the long-term vision for the plan area. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -2A: Promote land use patterns and development that contribute to community and neighborhood identity. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -6A: Ensure the long term productivity and viability of the community's economic base. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -4A: Encourage new development and redevelopment to improve and maintain the quality of the environment. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -5A: Ensure availability of adequate community facilities and provision of the highest level of public services possible, taking into consideration budgetary constraints and effects on the surrounding area. WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No 1054 (State Clearinghouse Number 2007011125) was certified on November 20, 2007 for the Wyndham Boutique Hotel / High -Rise and Final Master Plan PA -06-75 for the project that included 200 rooms and 120 for -sale condominium units; WHEREAS, in accordance with Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Sections 15162 and 15164, an addendum to the FEIR No. 1054 was prepared by BonTerra Psomas in August 2016 analyzing the environmental impacts associated with the change from residential units to hotel rooms; WHEREAS, in accordance with Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15162 and 15164, the Addendum to the EIR determined that the proposed modifications to the project which allows for hotel rooms to replace the residential units does not require preparation of a subsequent EIR because the proposed changes would not result in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified environmental impacts; WHEREAS, on August 22, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the amendment to the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan; WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on September 6, 2016 to allow for public comment on the proposed project and with all persons having been given the opportunity to be heard both for and against the proposed project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record, and the findings contained herein, the City Council adopts the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 and amendment to North Costa Mesa Specific Plan (SP -16-01) consistent with the provisions of the 2015-2035 General Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A to this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6t" day of September, 2016 ATTEST: STEPHEN M. MENSINGER Mayor, City of Costa Mesa APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF COSTA MESA STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Council Resolution Number 16_ as considered at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of September, 2016, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of September, 2016, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this day of , 2016 Brenda Green City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO NORTH COSTA MESA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP -16-01) RELATED TO HOME RANCH SITE AND SAKIOKA LOT 2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the 2015-2035 General Plan on June 21, 2016; WHEREAS, the General Plan is a long-range, comprehensive document that serves as a guide for the orderly development of Costa Mesa; WHEREAS, by its very nature, the General Plan needs to be updated and refined to account for current and future community needs; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan by Resolution No. 94-67 in July 1994; WHEREAS, the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan provides additional planning guidelines and standards for several large development areas located in north Costa Mesa; WHEREAS, by its very nature, the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan needs to be updated and refined to account for current and future community needs; WHEREAS, within the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, General Plan 2015-2035 allowed an increase in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for Home Ranch site, an increase in the residential density for Sakioka Lot 2, and development flexibility for 3350 Avenue of the Arts within the trip budgets adopted by the Land Use and Circulation Elements; WHEREAS, Home Ranch site is located in Area 1 (Subarea 3) of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and Sakioka Lot 2 is located in Area 8; WHEREAS, amendments to North Costa Mesa Specific Plan are required to reflect increased development flexibility for these planning areas as allowed by 2015- 2035 General Plan; WHEREAS, the amendments promote diversity of development options on Home Ranch and Sakioka Lot 2 that are in conformance with the objectives of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and General Plan, including the following: • North Costa Mesa Specific Plan - Recognize the development potential of the planning area and the need to sensitively integrate new development with the surrounding areas, and therefore, promote both resident and business community confidence in the long-term vision for the plan area. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -2A: Promote land use patterns and development that contribute to community and neighborhood identity. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -6A: Ensure the long term productivity and viability of the community's economic base. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -4A: Encourage new development and redevelopment to improve and maintain the quality of the environment. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -5A: Ensure availability of adequate community facilities and provision of the highest level of public services possible, taking into consideration budgetary constraints and effects on the surrounding area. WHEREAS, on August 22, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the amendment; WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on September 6, 2016 to allow for public comment on the proposed project and with all persons having been given the opportunity to be heard both for and against the proposed project. The Planning Commission recommended City Council approval of the proposal; WHEREAS, the project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City environmental procedures. The proposal has been found to be less than significant with regard to the development limitations in the General Plan and North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, including trip budgets and development intensity. Therefore, the relevant environmental analysis contained in the following previously -approved environmental documents has been found to be valid, and no further environmental review is required: • City of Costa Mesa General Plan Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2015111053, June 21, 2016. • Segerstrom Home Ranch Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000071050, November 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record, and the findings contained herein, the City Council adopts amendment to North Costa Mesa Specific Plan (SP -16-01 Al) related to Home Ranch site and Sakioka Lot 2 consistent with the provisions of the 2015-2035 General Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A to this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6t" day of September, 2016 STEPHEN M. MENSINGER Mayor, City of Costa Mesa ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF COSTA MESA STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Council Resolution Number 16_ as considered at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of September, 2016, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of September, 2016, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this day of , 2016 Brenda Green City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa