HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - CC-5 - Additional Documents - 9/6/2016ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR CC -5
From: SHELTON, KELLY
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 4:06 PM
To: GREEN, BRENDA; TRAYLOR, MARIAN
Subject: FW: Jack Hammett field project - consent calendar #5
-----Original Message -----
From: AL MELONE [mailto:amelone@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 3:58 PM
To: MENSINGER, STEPHEN <STEPHEN.MENS INGER@costamesaca.gov>; RIGHEIMER, JIM
<JIM.RIG HEIMER@costamesaca.gov>; MONAHAN, GARY
<GARY.MONAHAN@costamesaca.gov>; FOLEY, KATRINA
<KATRINA.FOLEY@costamesaca.gov>; GENIS, SANDRA <SANDRA.GENIS@costamesaca.gov>
Cc: HATCH, THOMAS <THOMAS.HATCH@costamesaca.gov>
Subject: Jack Hammett field project - consent calendar #5
Dear Council members,
It appears this item is a done deal. But I would still like to put in my two cents.
As hard as it is to turn down free money, this city cannot afford this artificial turf project, in my opinion.
I can understand that no politician wants to be put in a position appearing to be the Grinch who stole
Christmas (before youth sports activists.)
But please consider the following:
1. At some point in time, maybe 10 years or so,
replacement. (If ignored for too long, it may
become a hazard.)
that artificial turf will become worn out and need
2. What if the economy 10 years from now is not so great? That future council will have then
inherited a PROBLEM. (From you folks)
3. If at that point they feel compelled to go back to grass, they still have to relocate that worn out
plastic to a landfill (lousy ecology) and then wait 12-18
months for the new sod to get what they call "established" such that it can bear heavy sports
traffic. Which would mean shutting down
that field for a year or more. Ouch!
4. As a practical matter, you are locking in future councils to a larger operating "nut." Whatever
annual savings are achieved will be more than offset by each
10 year balloon.
Al Melone
CC -10 Biennial Review of City's Conflict of Interest Code
Revised to add the Senior Commission.
NOTE: The following positions are not included in the
Conflict of Interest Code as they already must file pursuant
to Government Code Section 87200:
Council Members
Planning Commissioners
City Manager
City Attorney
City Treasurer
ATTACHMENT B
APPENDIX A
The term "Designated" refers to employees or officials, set forth by position or job
classifications. A designated employee or official, for the purpose of this resolution, and
in compliance with the City's Conflict of Interest Code (Costa Mesa Municipal Code
Section 2-401, et al) shall include a spouse and immediate members of the family. Any
person hired or promoted into a job classification included in this resolution shall become
a designated employee for the purpose of the City's conflict of Interest Code without
further action of the City Council. Added positions are highlighted.
DEPARTMENT/POSITION TITLES REPORTING CATEGORY
4:100"M WIMIUM
Assistant Chief Executive Officer All
Management Analyst
All
City Clerk
All
Public Affairs Manager
All
Human Resources Manager
All
Human Resources Analyst
All
Principal Human Resources Analyst
All
Central Services Supervisor
All
Public Information Officer
All
Assistant Recreation Supervisor
All
Deputy City Clerk
All
City Attorney's Office
Assistant City Attorney All
Deputy City Attorney All
Development Services Department
Economic & Development Services Director
All
Economic Development Director
All
Development Service Director
All
Assistant Development Services Director
All
Principal Planner
All
Senior Planner
All
Associate Planner
All
Assistant Planner
All
Building Official
All
Building Inspector
All
Senior Electrical Inspector
All
Senior Plumbing/Mechanical Inspector
All
Chief Plans Examiner
All
Plan Checker (consultant)
All
Code Enforcement Officer
1 &4
Plan Checker
All
Chief of Inspection
All
Chief of Code Enforcement
All
Building Technician I & II
All
Combination Building Inspector
All
Plan Check Engineer
All
Plan Review Consultants
All
V.2 9/6/16
Management Analyst
All
Permit Processing Specialist
All
CDBG/HOME Coordinator
All
Senior Combo Inspector
All
Zoning Administrator
All
Senior Code Enforcement Officer
1 & 4
Community Improvement Manager
All
Finance Department
All
Assistant Finance Director
All
Budget Research Officer
All
Accounting Supervisor
All
Purchasing Supervisor
All
Buyer
All
Revenue Supervisor
All
Tax Auditing Specialist
1 &4
Management Analyst
All
Budget Analyst
All
Recreation Manager All
Senior Center Program Administrator All
Management Analyst All
Recreation Supervisor All
Assistant Recreation Supervisor All
Police Chief
All
Police Captain
All
Police Administrative Services Commander
All
Public Affairs Manager
All
Management Analyst
All
Fire Chief
All
Deputy Chief
All
Battalion Chief
All
Management Analyst
All
Fire Protection Analyst
All
Information Technology Director All
Systems & Programming Supervisor All
Operations & Network Supervisor All
Telesemmunisations Manager All
Director of Public Services All
City Engineer All
Senior Engineer All
Transportation Services Manager All
V.2 9/6/16
Construction Inspector
All
Chief Construction Inspector
All
Assistant Engineer
All
Associate Engineer
All
Maintenance Services Manager
All
Facilities and Equipment Supervisor
All
Contract Administrator
All
Maintenance Superintendent
All
Management Analyst
All
Senior Commission
R
NOTE: The following positions are not included in the Conflict of Interest Code as
they already must file pursuant to Government Code Section 87200:
Council Members
Planning Commissioners
City Manager
City Attorney
City Treasurer
V.2 9/6/16
CITY COUNCIL
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 ITEM NUMBER: PH -1
SUBJECT: NORTH COSTA MESA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (SP -16-01) RELATED TO
HOME RANCH SITE, 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS AND SAKIOKA LOT 2
DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2016
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION BY: MINOO ASHABI, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MINOO ASHABI (714) 754-5610
minoo.ashabi@costamesaca.gov
Two (2) resolutions are presented to the City Council as part of this action. One
resolution recommends approval of an addendum for Final EIR No. 1054 and
amendment to the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan related to the property located at 3350
Avenue of the Arts. The second resolution would allow for amendment to the North
Costa Mesa Specific Plan related to the Home Ranch Site and Sakioka Lot 2.
MINOO ASHABI, AIA GARY ARMSTRONG, AICP
Principal Planner Economic Development & Development
Services Director / Deputy CEO
Attachments: 1. Draft City Council Resolutions
cc: Justin McCusker
C.J. Segerstrom & Sons
3315 Fairview Road
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
George Sakioka
14850 Sunflower Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92707George Sakioka
Judy Wang
Wincome Group
888 Disneyland Dr I Suite 100
Anaheim, CA 92802
Paul Sanford, Rosanna Inc.
3350 Avenue of the Arts
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
RESOLUTION NO. 16-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 1054 (STATE
CLEARING HOUSE NUMBER 2007011125) AND
AMENDMENT TO NORTH COSTA MESA SPECIFIC PLAN
(SP -16-01) RELATED TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the 2015-2035
General Plan on June 21, 2016;
WHEREAS, the General Plan is a long-range, comprehensive document that
serves as a guide for the orderly development of Costa Mesa;
WHEREAS, by its very nature, the General Plan needs to be updated and
refined to account for current and future community needs;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the
North Costa Mesa Specific Plan by Resolution No. 94-67 in July 1994 to provide
additional planning guidelines and standards for several large development areas
located in north Costa Mesa;
WHEREAS, within the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, General Plan 2015-2035
allowed an increase in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for Home Ranch site, an increase in
the residential density for Sakioka Lot 2, and development flexibility for 3350 Avenue of
the Arts within the trip budgets adopted by the Land Use and Circulation Elements;
WHEREAS, the amendments promote diversity of development options at 3350
Avenue of The Arts are in conformance with the objectives of the North Costa Mesa
Specific Plan and General Plan, including the following:
• North Costa Mesa Specific Plan - Recognize the development potential of
the planning area and the need to sensitively integrate new development
with the surrounding areas, and therefore, promote both resident and
business community confidence in the long-term vision for the plan area.
• General Plan Land Use Objective LU -2A: Promote land use patterns and
development that contribute to community and neighborhood identity.
• General Plan Land Use Objective LU -6A: Ensure the long term productivity
and viability of the community's economic base.
• General Plan Land Use Objective LU -4A: Encourage new development and
redevelopment to improve and maintain the quality of the environment.
• General Plan Land Use Objective LU -5A: Ensure availability of adequate
community facilities and provision of the highest level of public services
possible, taking into consideration budgetary constraints and effects on
the surrounding area.
WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No 1054 (State
Clearinghouse Number 2007011125) was certified on November 20, 2007 for the
Wyndham Boutique Hotel / High -Rise and Final Master Plan PA -06-75 for the project
that included 200 rooms and 120 for -sale condominium units;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations
Sections 15162 and 15164, an addendum to the FEIR No. 1054 was prepared by
BonTerra Psomas in August 2016 analyzing the environmental impacts associated with
the change from residential units to hotel rooms;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations
Section 15162 and 15164, the Addendum to the EIR determined that the proposed
modifications to the project which allows for hotel rooms to replace the residential units
does not require preparation of a subsequent EIR because the proposed changes
would not result in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified environmental impacts;
WHEREAS, on August 22, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing
and recommended approval of the amendment to the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan;
WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on
September 6, 2016 to allow for public comment on the proposed project and with all
persons having been given the opportunity to be heard both for and against the
proposed project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the
record, and the findings contained herein, the City Council adopts the Addendum to the
Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 and amendment to North Costa Mesa
Specific Plan (SP -16-01) consistent with the provisions of the 2015-2035 General Plan
attached hereto as Exhibit A to this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6t" day of September, 2016
ATTEST:
STEPHEN M. MENSINGER
Mayor, City of Costa Mesa
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF COSTA MESA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Council Resolution Number 16_
as considered at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of
September, 2016, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular
meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of September, 2016, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the
City of Costa Mesa this day of , 2016
Brenda Green
City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
RESOLUTION NO. 16-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO NORTH
COSTA MESA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP -16-01) RELATED TO
HOME RANCH SITE AND SAKIOKA LOT 2
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the 2015-2035
General Plan on June 21, 2016;
WHEREAS, the General Plan is a long-range, comprehensive document that
serves as a guide for the orderly development of Costa Mesa;
WHEREAS, by its very nature, the General Plan needs to be updated and
refined to account for current and future community needs;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the
North Costa Mesa Specific Plan by Resolution No. 94-67 in July 1994;
WHEREAS, the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan provides additional planning
guidelines and standards for several large development areas located in north Costa
Mesa;
WHEREAS, by its very nature, the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan needs to be
updated and refined to account for current and future community needs;
WHEREAS, within the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, General Plan 2015-2035
allowed an increase in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for Home Ranch site, an increase in
the residential density for Sakioka Lot 2, and development flexibility for 3350 Avenue of
the Arts within the trip budgets adopted by the Land Use and Circulation Elements;
WHEREAS, Home Ranch site is located in Area 1 (Subarea 3) of the North
Costa Mesa Specific Plan and Sakioka Lot 2 is located in Area 8;
WHEREAS, amendments to North Costa Mesa Specific Plan are required to
reflect increased development flexibility for these planning areas as allowed by 2015-
2035 General Plan;
WHEREAS, the amendments promote diversity of development options on
Home Ranch and Sakioka Lot 2 that are in conformance with the objectives of the
North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and General Plan, including the following:
• North Costa Mesa Specific Plan - Recognize the development potential of
the planning area and the need to sensitively integrate new development
with the surrounding areas, and therefore, promote both resident and
business community confidence in the long-term vision for the plan area.
• General Plan Land Use Objective LU -2A: Promote land use patterns and
development that contribute to community and neighborhood identity.
• General Plan Land Use Objective LU -6A: Ensure the long term productivity
and viability of the community's economic base.
• General Plan Land Use Objective LU -4A: Encourage new development and
redevelopment to improve and maintain the quality of the environment.
• General Plan Land Use Objective LU -5A: Ensure availability of adequate
community facilities and provision of the highest level of public services
possible, taking into consideration budgetary constraints and effects on
the surrounding area.
WHEREAS, on August 22, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing
and recommended approval of the amendment;
WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on
September 6, 2016 to allow for public comment on the proposed project and with all
persons having been given the opportunity to be heard both for and against the
proposed project. The Planning Commission recommended City Council approval of
the proposal;
WHEREAS, the project has been reviewed for compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City environmental
procedures. The proposal has been found to be less than significant with regard to the
development limitations in the General Plan and North Costa Mesa Specific Plan,
including trip budgets and development intensity. Therefore, the relevant environmental
analysis contained in the following previously -approved environmental documents has
been found to be valid, and no further environmental review is required:
• City of Costa Mesa General Plan Environmental Impact Report, SCH No.
2015111053, June 21, 2016.
• Segerstrom Home Ranch Environmental Impact Report, SCH No.
2000071050, November 2001.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the
record, and the findings contained herein, the City Council adopts amendment to North
Costa Mesa Specific Plan (SP -16-01 Al) related to Home Ranch site and Sakioka Lot 2
consistent with the provisions of the 2015-2035 General Plan attached hereto as Exhibit
A to this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6t" day of September, 2016
STEPHEN M. MENSINGER
Mayor, City of Costa Mesa
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF COSTA MESA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Council Resolution Number 16_
as considered at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of
September, 2016, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular
meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of September, 2016, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the
City of Costa Mesa this day of , 2016
Brenda Green
City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa