Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 - PH-2 - First Reading of Ordinance 16-XX of City - 11/1/2016CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 2016 ITEM NUMBER: PH -2 SUBJECT: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 16 -XX OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR REZONE R-15-01 TO REZONE (OR CHANGE) A 3.18 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 375 BRISTOL STREET FROM PDC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL) TO C2 (GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) AND PLANNING APPLICATION PA -15-30 FOR A SELF -STORAGE FACILITY AND RETAIL BUILDING AT 375 BRISTOL STREET DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 FROM: PLANNING DIVISION/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION BY: MEL LEE, SENIOR PLANNER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MEL LEE, AICP (714) 754-5611 mel.lee@costamesaca.gov DESCRIPTION The proposed project involves the following: 1. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND): This document analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Significant environmental impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance. 2. Rezone R-15-01: An ordinance to rezone a 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District). 3. Planning Application PA -15-30: Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the partial demolition of the existing automotive center (Bristol Autoplex) and the development of a mini -storage facility and to retain 12,500 square feet of the existing retail building. No code deviations are requested. NOTE: The project as originally presented to the Planning Commission was demolition of the entire Bristol Autoplex center in order to construct a 774 -unit mini -storage facility and 5,000 square foot food court building, which was recommended for denial by the City Council. In response to the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial, the applicant has redesigned the project as discussed later in this report. APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT The applicant/authorized agent is Annette Wiley, representing the property owner, Sanderson J. Ray Development. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve the Initial Study/Negative Declaration; 2. Give first reading to Ordinance 16-xx for R-15-01 to rezone (or change) a 3.18 - acre site located at 375 Bristol Street from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District); and 3. Approve Planning Application PA -15-30 by adopting a resolution to approve the project, subject to conditions of approval. PLANNING APPLICATION SUMMARY (ORIGINAL PROJECT -DENIED BY COMMISSION) Location: 375 Bristol Street Application: R-15-01 and PA -15-30 Request: 774 -unit mini -storage facility and 5,000 square foot food court building SUBJECT PROPERTY: SURROUNDING PROPERTY: Zone: PDC (Exist.); C2 (Prop.) North: (Acr. Bristol St.), 55 and 73 Freeways General Plan: General Commercial South: Santa Ana Delhi Channel and Residences 138,487 SF (3.18 AC) (City of Newport Beach) Lot Dimensions: Irregular East: Golf Course (City of Newport Beach) Lot Area: 138,487 SF (3.18 AC) West: PDC, Hotel and Shopping Center Existing Development: Bristol Street Autoplex (Portion To Be Demolished) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD COMPARISON Development Standard Required/Allowed Proposed/Provided Lot Size: Lot Width 120 FT 560 FT Lot Area 12,000 SF Min. 138,487 SF (3.18 AC) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .75 (103,865 SF Max.) (98,800 SF) - Self -Storage (6,200 SF) - Food Court and Office .76 (105,000 SF Total) No. of Stories/Building Height 2 Stories/30 FT Food Court and Office: 1 Story/21 FT Self -Storage Building: 2 Stories/21 FT (30 FT to Top of Elevators) Interior Landscaping 1,575 SF 2,337.5 SF Setbacks (Buildings) Front 20 FT 25 FT to Food Court Building 68 FT to Self -Storage Building Side (left/right) 15 FT/0 FT 31 FT/ 35 FT Rear 0 FT 29 FT Parkin Standard 59 60 Handicap 4 4 TOTAL 63 Spaces 64 Spaces NA = Not Applicable or No Requirement CEQA Status Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final Action I City Council PLANNING APPLICATION SUMMARY (REVISED PROJECT) Location: 375 Bristol Street Application: R-15-01 and PA -15-30 Request: 719 -unit mini -storage facility and 12,500 SF Retail Building To Remain) SUBJECT PROPERTY: SURROUNDING PROPERTY: Zone: PDC (Exist.); C2 (Prop.) North: (Acr. Bristol St.), 55 and 73 Freeways General Plan: General Commercial South: Santa Ana Delhi Channel and Residences 138,487 SF 3.18 AC (City of Newport Beach) Lot Dimensions: Irregular East: Golf Course (City of Newport Beach) Lot Area: 138,487 SF (3.18 AC) West: PDC, Hotel and Shopping Center Existing Development: Bristol Street Autoplex (Portion To Be Demolished) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD COMPARISON Development Standard Required/Allowed Proposed/Provided Lot Size: Lot Width 120 FT 560 FT Lot Area 12,000 SF Min. 138,487 SF 3.18 AC Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .75 (103,865 SF Max.) (90,910 SF) - Self -Storage (12,500 SF) — Retail Building (To Remain) .75 (103,410 SF Total) No. of Stories/Building Height 2 Stories/30 FT Retail Building (To Remain): 1 Story/20.5 FT Self -Storage Building: 2 Stories/28.5 FT Interior Landscaping 2,325 SF 2,337.5 SF Setbacks (Buildings) Front 20 FT 68 FT Side (left/right) 15 FT/0 FT 31 FT/ 35 FT Rear OFT 29 FT Parking Standard 82 89 Handicap 4 4 TOTAL 86 Spaces 93 Spaces NA = Not Applicable or No Requirement CEQA Status Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final Action City Council BACKGROUND Project Site/Environs The project site is located in the eastern portion of City of Costa Mesa. The site is located at the southern end of Bristol Street, west of Campus Drive, where the road splits into a frontage road along SR -73 at 375 Bristol Street. A shopping center and the Ayers Hotel abuts the site to the west, and a golf course (in the City of Newport Beach) abuts the site to the east. The 55 -foot -wide concrete Santa Ana Delhi Channel borders the site to the south. The subject site is 138,487 square feet in size (3.18 Acres) and is currently developed with an automotive center (Bristol Street Autoplex) constructed in the late 1980's. The automotive center is 37,883 square feet in size and consists of three buildings with multiple tenants and a surface parking lot. The property is currently zoned PDC (Planned Development Commercial) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial. June 13, 2016 Planning Commission Hearing On June 13, 2016, the Planning Commission considered the original project. During the hearing, 17 persons spoke in opposition to the request, the majority of whom were existing tenants of the Bristol Autoplex. Based on the testimony presented by the tenants at the hearing, the Commission recommended denial of the original project on by a 4-1 vote (Chair Dickson voting no). In response to the Commission's recommendation for denial, the applicant has revised the project reducing the number of self -storage units from 774 to 714 and retaining 12,500 square feet of the existing retail center for some of the existing tenants. ANALYSIS Zone Change A rezone (or change) of the zoning classification of the 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District) is proposed. The proposed rezone would be compatible with the existing General Commercial General Plan designation for the project site. The Zoning Code requires that a finding be made as to whether or not the rezone is consistent with the Zoning Code and General Plan. Self -Storage Use If the project is approved, the hours of operation for the self -storage leasing office will be Monday through Saturday, 8:00 am to 6:00 pm, and Sunday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Customers of the self -storage facility shall have access to the storage units via a key pad entry gates system between the hours of 7:00 am to 8:00 pm, seven days a week. The leasing office manager will not reside overnight at the facility. Retention of 12,500 Square Feet of the Existing Retail Center In response to the testimony presented at the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant has revised the project to retain approximately 12,500 square feet of existing retail space, including the sushi and sandwich restaurants (4,000 square feet combined) and relocating other auto -related tenants to the remaining available area of approximately 8,770 square feet. As noted in the Zoning Code summary on the previous pages, no code deviations are being requested for the revised project. October 10, 2016 Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission considered the request at its October 10, 2016 meeting. During the hearing three persons spoke in favor of the request and three persons spoke in opposition. The Commission recommended approval of the redesigned project on a 5- 0 vote because the revised project addressed the Commission's prior concerns with the potential impacts on the existing tenants. Additionally, the Commission suggested that the applicant provide to the City Council the economic befits to the City as a result, of the proposed project, which is attached to this report for reference (Attachment 3). ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the IS/MND was originally made available for a 30 -day public review and comment period from May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016. The IS/MND found that the environmental effects from the project would be less than significant with the incorporation of standard conditions of approval and mitigation measures (see Exhibit C of the Planning Commission resolution). A copy of the IS/MND prepared for the original project is included with this report under separate cover. An addendum reflecting the revised project is also provided under separate cover. PUBLIC NOTICE Pursuant to Title 13, Section 13-29(d), of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, three types of public notification have been completed no less than 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing: 1. Mailed notice. A public notice was mailed to all property owners within a 500 - foot radius of the project site. The required notice radius is measured from the external boundaries of the property. Notices were also mailed to the existing retail center tenants. 2. On-site posting. A public notice was posted on each street frontage of the project site. 3. Newspaper publication. A public notice was published once in the Daily Pilot newspaper. FISCAL REVIEW Fiscal review is not required for this item. LEGAL REVIEW The City Attorney has reviewed the draft ordinance and resolutions and they have been approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office. ALTERNATIVES The City Council may take the following actions: 1. Uphold the Planning Commission's decision to approve the project; or 2. Reverse the Planning Commission's decision and deny the project. If the project is denied, the applicant would not be able to submit substantially the same project for 6 months. CONCLUSION In response to the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the project, the applicant has revised the project and is requesting approval. The Planning Commission is now recommending approval of the project. MEL LEE, AICP JAY TREVINO, AICP Senior Planner Economic Development and Development Services Director/ Consultant Attachments: 1. Location Map and Zoning Map 2. Site Photos 3. Applicant's Revised Project Description and Summary of Economic Benefits 4. Draft Ordinance, Resolutions, and Exhibits 5. Correspondence From Public 6. Plans (Original and Revised) 7. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 8. October 10, 2016 Planning Commission Staff Report 9. Planning Commission Resolution 10. Supplemental Letter for Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 11. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Under Separate Cover) cc: Annette Wiley, FAIA 220 Newport Center Drive, #11-166 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Sanderson J. Ray Development 2699 White Road #150 Irvine, CA 92614 Arabesque Said-Abdelwahed Senior Associate ESA I Environmental Science Associates 2121 Alton Parkway, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92606 City of Costa Mesa CITY OF COSTA MESA - [Created: 6/2/2016 12:57:26 PM] [Scale: 282.67] [Page: 8.5 x 11 / Landscape] Overview Map Legend Address Street Points Names oel Freeway Street Roads Centerlin- es �' car�tvr Fav �,i Parcel mapr Lines Nin aLV0 ❑ City 140 ft --y Boundary SECONOA- H Water Ways 9y Channel - Map Display C1 r A),- MP c� COUNTY A D SCI!"2C-#v ovGoaPrme.NET 00147ft Z ICI 2002-6 GeoPrise.net (GeoVec, Inc.) - (866)422-2505 City of Costa Mesa CITY OF COSTA MESA - [Created: 6/2/2016 12:56:23 PM] [Scale: 282.671 [Page: 8.5 x 11 / Landscape] Overview Map Legend Address Street Points Names Freeway Street Roads Centerlin- es 04/ cotiector of fr•—'ay ;/ Parcel M,ow Lines ,' Newport BLVD City Prim -Y Boundary +t SLC4NOA Y H Water Ways 9y Channel - Map Display A A- Ilk TO , � ny 49 Z T y �4k �i F COUNTY _ ',� ` �Yt � � •til � y ,� { } (C)2002-6 GeoPrise.net (GeoVec, Inc.) - (866)422-2505 i� 2002 GaoPrisn.NLT .dh er' ��_ Advanced Listing Services Inc Ownership Listings & Radius Maps P.O. Box 2593 • Dana Point, CA • 92624 J Office (949) 36 1-392 1 • Fax: (949) 36 I -3923 www.Advancedlisting.com Subject APN: 119-200-33 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST 500' Radius COSTA MESA CA 92626 `o RED H/LL G.-, r IRVINETRA 4T AI 127 L4 f ( ii PAR 2 0 � i 9► i__J i �, Y 21 N0.45e 10 1.051 AG � y i o G) O �. �_ - 9 O CAME V O A- b pop Lor 1 o f .,,. .. O w �► WW FRwy Z 10.24 AG. e ' 6 r ©" o (3 1 'P $ 3204 AG O '; NO No. 4307 n- nrr 60, © O=0 q � x� 1nr DRIVE `�.., N0. 4146 ' O " r` Qi J"—' O L�7 10'A -FAIN E1'YT�,,e� cRiY1' �n.se � tlic o .5ia 4i 'O 1 • J001 0191r N0. 456 1,�{ 6.55 .f. +' pp 1 �• D © s > rw C, `•.. $ AC a ° FAY 97 E R t September 27, 2016 Mel Lee, AICP Senior Planner City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92628 2121 Alton Parkway Suite 100 www.esassoc.com Irvine, CA 92606 949.753.7001 phone ATTACHMENT 10 949.753.7002 fax Subject: 375 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility and Automotive and Food -Related Retail Supplemental Letter Report Dear Mr. Lee: The City of Costa Mesa prepared a Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sf) in May 2016. The Draft IS/MND analyzed the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The IS/MND found that the environmental effects from the project would be less than significant with the incorporation of standard conditions of approval and mitigation measures. The Notice Draft IS/MND was posted on May 14, 2016 with the County Clerk in Orange County. The Draft IS/MND was circulated for a 30 -day public review until June 12, 2016. The Draft IS/MND was circulated to federal, state, and local agencies and interested parties requesting a copy of the Draft IS/MND. The City of Costa Mesa received five comment letters during public review period from the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Division of Aeronautics, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department), OC Public Works, John Wayne Airport, and Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County. The letters were bracketed, comments numbered and presented in the order within the Final IS/MND prepared in June 2016. The City of Costa Mesa provided individual responses to the bracketed comments in each letter. In some instances, in response to the comment, the City of Costa Mesa made additions or deletions to the text of Draft IS/MND. The project was presented to the Planning Commission on June 8, 2016. Several concerns were raised at the Planning Commission public hearing by existing tenants at the project site and concerned community members. The existing tenants expressed opposition to the proposed project due to businesses needing to be relocated from the existing project site. Subsequent to the Planning Commission Hearing, the project applicant revised the project. The revisions include partial versus full demolition of the existing 37,883 square foot (sf) multi -tenant automotive center, and the development of a new two-story 8 9,9 10 sf, 744 unit self -storage facility with a 1,000 sf ground -floor management office (Figures 1, 2 and 3). The revised project provides ongoing business operations for some of the current tenants. The eastern portion of the existing building is proposed to remain in place during construction with fagade renovations planned as part of the project. The existing building to remain encompasses 12,450 sf of retail including the existing sushi and sandwich operations (3,690 sf combined). The revised project would include rooftop -mounted solar panels (Figure 4). Table 1 provides a comparison of the previous project and the revised project as well as identifies the existing uses to remain on the site and the proposed uses. —216— 2021. PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING �j SOURCE: Wiley Architects, 2016 BRISTOL STREET 9 ME PARKING CALCULATIONS PARKING RETAIL, AUTOMOTIVE 4/1000 8810 SF X 4 = 36 PARKING OFFICE 4/1000 1000 SF X 4; 4 PARKING RESTAURANT 10/1000 FOR 3000 3000 SF X 10 = 30 PARKING RESTAURANT 12/1000 OVER 3000 690 SF X 12 = 9 PARKING STORAGE 1/200 UNITS 719 UNITS= 4 PARKING TOTAL REQUIRED 83 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED 93 SPACES BUILDING AREAS STORAGE LEVEL 1 44,455 SF STORAGE LEVEL 2 45,455 SF TOTAL STORAGE 89,910 SF OFFICE 1,000 SF AUTO RETAIL 8.810 SF RESTAURANT 3,690 SF TOTAL 103,410 SF 1 9 j Costa Mesa IS/MND . 150652 Figure 1 Revised Site Plan SOURCE: Wiley Architects, 2016 UNITE iM FLOOR 2nd FLOOR UNIT TOTAL 912E 8F. QW.oss es r w. 80. FT. QTY. S0. FT. OTY —. urn M. FT. 5 X S • 26 8 225 88 2,200 97 12.8% 2,425 5 X 10 . 50 71 (1) 3,550 141 7.050 212 29.5% 10,600 10 X 8 • 80 22 1,760 18 1,440 40 5.6% 1,200 10 X 10 • 100 72 7,200 147 14,700 219 30.5% 21,900 10 X 15 • 150 47 (6) 7,050 41 6,150 88 12.2% 13,200 10 X 20 • 200 35 (35) 7.000 0 0 35 4.9% 7,000 10 X 25 • 250 11 (11) 2,750 0 0 11 1.5% 2,750 10 X 27.5 r 275 3 (3) 825 0 0 3 0.4% 825 10 X 30 • 300 14 (14) 4.200 0 0 14 1.9% 4.200 TOTAL 268 (111) 36.860 435 31.540 716 100% IM100 e9F ...... 44A26 45.463 KU111 UFICH NC7 FACTOR 72.6% 06.4% 73.5% T -211- Costa 11 - Costa Mesa IS/MND . 150652 Figure 2 Ground Floor Plan LI w West Elevation East Elevation SOURCE: Wiley Architects, 2016 -213- Costa Mesa IS/MND. 150652 Figure 3 Exterior Elevations w. k _. olift �.rl' SOURCE: Wiley Architects, 2015 --;,0— Costa Mesa IS/MND . 150652 Figure 4 Rendered View r ES11 J Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 2 TABLE 1 PROJECT CHARACTERISTIC COMPARISON Characteristics Previous Project (sf) Revised Project (sf) Existing Uses to Remain Restaurant 0 3,690 Retail (sf) 0 8,810 (existing) Total Existing Uses to Remain 0 12,500 Proposed Uses Self -Storage 98,800 89,910 Office 1,200 1,000 Total Proposed Uses 105,000 90,910 Parking (number of spaces) 64 93 Height (feet) 30 28 Environmental Analysis Because the previous project was revised by the project applicant, the revised project requires an evaluation of its potential environmental impacts associated with construction and operation. The analysis presented below includes an evaluation of each of the environmental issues addressed in the previous project's IS/MND. The analysis identifies the level of impact associated with the previous project and determines the level of impact as a result of implementing the revised project. Aesthetics The previous analyzed project would not have an effect on a designated scenic view or vista, would not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway. The previous analyzed project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, and the impact would be less than significant. The previous analyzed project would not significantly affect lighting impacts on residential uses that are located south of the project site and south of the Santa Ana Delhi Channel. This would result in a less than significant impact. The previously analyzed project included 360 rooftop -mounted photovoltaic modules with anti -reflective coating. The previously analyzed project received the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA's) final approval on the project's design and roof -mounted solar panels. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would similarly not have an effect on a designated scenic view or vista, and would not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway. Similar to the previous project, ►" ES,k J Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 3 the revised project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, and the impact would be less than significant. Similar to the previous analyzed project, the revised project would not significantly affect lighting impacts on residential uses that are located south of the project site and south of the Santa Ana Delhi Channel. This would result in a less than significant impact. The previously analyzed project included 360 rooftop -mounted photovoltaic modules with anti -reflective coating. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would include the same number of solar panels with the same orientation. FAA provided a final approval letter, and impacts are less than significant. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the aesthetics evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Agriculture and Forest Resources The project site is currently developed for commercial uses. The project vicinity is void of any agricultural uses and The California Department of Conservation Important Farmland Map for Orange County identified the project site as urban and built-up land (CDC, 2012). The IS/MND concluded that implementation of the project would not result in the loss of land in agricultural production, and no farmland, agriculturally zoned, or Williamson Act land would be affected by implementation of the Housing Element. Additionally, as stated in the IS/MND, there is no forest land, timberland or timberland zoned Timberland Production on the project site. Therefore, the IS/MND concluded that no impacts to agricultural or forest resources would occur as a result of implementation of the project, and no mitigation measures are required. Summary Similar to the previous project, development of the revised project would not have a significant impact to agriculture and forest resources. No new significant effects or substantial changes to the agriculture and forest resources evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Air Quality Construction The previous analyzed project included construction activities on the entire 4 -acre site. The emissions associated with the construction activities were found to exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regional significance threshold for reactive organic gases (ROG) and not exceed the significance -Z1(0, r ES1t Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 4 thresholds for oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of sulfur (SOx), and particulate matter (10 microns and 2.5 microns). The construction activities associated with the revised project would result in less construction activities because a portion of the existing building would remain on the site. Although less construction is anticipated with the revised project, similar daily construction activities are assumed to occur. Therefore, the revised project would result in a similar exceedance of SCAQMD's regional significance threshold for ROG and a similar less than significant impact on the other criteria pollutants as well as any sensitive receptors in the project area. As with the previous project, the implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce ROG emissions associated with the revised project to less than the threshold. Mitigation Measure AIR -1: The applicant shall utilize architectural coatings for both interior and exterior finishing with low or no VOC to avoid potential significant impacts to air quality. These architectural coatings shall be rated with emissions less than or equal to 50 gallons per liter. Mitigation measure AIR -1 would require the use of architectural coatings with low or no volatile organic compounds (VOC). Similar to the previous project, ROG emissions would reduce emissions to less than the SCAQMD threshold for ROG emissions. Therefore, AIR -1 would reduce this potential construction impact related to regional air quality to less than significant. Operation The previous analyzed project included operational activities. These operational activities included emissions associated with area sources such as natural gas consumption, landscaping, periodic applications of architectural coatings, and consumer products, in addition to operational mobile emissions. The analysis identified that the previous project would result in long-term regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors that are below SCAQMD's applicable thresholds. The previous project's operational emissions would not result in or substantially contribute to emissions concentrations that exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) or expose sensitive receptors. Therefore, operational emissions would not violate any air quality standard, contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, or expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Impacts would be less than significant. Unlike the previous project, the revised project would not include new retail (food services) on the project site. The project would retain a few of the existing establishments on the project site (some of which includes food services). In addition, the revised project would also include fewer storage units. As a result, the revised project would generate fewer operational emissions compared to the previous project. Because the revised project would E Syk J Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 5 result in less operational emissions compared to the previous project, the revised project would result in less than significant emissions, and a less than significant impact to air quality would occur with the revised project. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the air quality evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Biological Resources As concluded in the IS/MND, implementation of the project would result in no impacts to special -status species, any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community, federal or state protected wetlands, any local policy or ordinance protecting trees and biological resources, or an adopted HCP or NCCP. The ornamental trees on the site may be removed by the proposed project. If tree removal occurs during the general nesting season of February through August, there may be a potential impact to nesting birds protected in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game (CFG) Code Section 3500. Potential impacts to nesting birds would be a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO -1 and BIO -2 would reduce potential significant impacts to a less than significant level through avoidance of nesting season or avoidance of nesting disturbance. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would not impact special -status species, any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community, federal or state protected wetlands, any local policy or ordinance protecting trees and biological resources, or an adopted HCP or NCCP. However, similar to the previous project, the revised project may remove ornamental trees that could result in potential impacts to nesting birds. As with the previous project, the implementation of the Mitigation Measures BIO -1 and BIO -2 would reduce potential significant impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures BIO -1: To avoid potential significant impacts to nesting birds, the proposed project should commence outside the general nesting season. BIO -2: If the project must commence during the general nesting season, a pre -construction clearance survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist within 3 days prior to the start of the project to determine if any active nests or nestlings are present on the project site. If no active nesting is observed the project may commence without potential impacts to nesting birds. -2191- ESA Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 6 If active nesting is observed, a suitable buffer will be established around the nest and a biological monitor will be on-site to determine no impact occurs. No project activities may encroach into the buffer until the nest is no longer active as determined by the biological monitor. Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO -1 and BIO -2 would reduce potential significant impacts to a less than significant level through avoidance of nesting season or avoidance of nesting disturbance. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the biological resources evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Cultural Resources The previous analyzed project and the revised project would similarly result in no impact to historical resources, and would result in less than significant impacts to paleontological resources and human remains. Based on the literature reviews and previous construction, the project site might contain prehistoric archaeological resources. The depth of disturbance during the previous construction of the project site is not known. Therefore, construction activities associated with the proposed project could encounter archaeological resources. If archaeological resources are encountered, potential significant impacts could occur. To reduce these potential impacts to cultural resources, Standard Condition SC 4.5-1 shall be implemented. The construction activities associated with the revised project could similarly encounter archaeological resources. If archaeological resources are encountered, potential significant impacts could occur. To reduce these potential impacts to cultural resources, Standard Condition SC 4.5-1 shall be implemented for the revised project. Standard Condition SC 4.5-1 In the event that archaeological resources are encountered during grading and construction, all construction activities shall be temporarily halted or redirected to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of archaeological materials as determined by the City, who shall establish, in cooperation with the project Applicant and a certified archaeologist, the appropriate procedures for exploration and/or salvage of the artifacts. -2Iq-- ES,k. 0 Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 7 After the implementation of Standard Condition 4.5-1, impacts to archaeological resources could remain due to the previous discoveries of archaeological resources in the immediate project vicinity. Therefore, construction activities associated with the proposed project could result in potential significant impacts to cultural resources. Mitigation Measures As with the previous project, the following Mitigation Measures CUL -1 and CUL -2 are proposed if the excavations for the revised project are deeper than previous excavations. If the proposed excavation is not deeper than previous excavations, then MMs CUL -1 and CUL -2 are not required. CUL -1: Prior to start of ground -disturbing activities, a qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for archaeology (U.S. Department of the Interior, 2008) shall conduct cultural resources sensitivity training for all construction personnel. Construction personnel shall be informed of the types of archaeological resources that may be encountered, and of the proper procedures to be enacted in the event of an inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or human remains. The City shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and retain documentation demonstrating attendance CUL -2: An archaeological monitor (working under the direct supervision of the qualified archaeologist) shall observe ground -disturbing activities within previously undisturbed soils. The qualified archaeologist, in coordination with the City, may reduce or discontinue monitoring if it is determined that the possibility of encountering buried archaeological deposits is low based on observations of soil stratigraphy or other factors. Archaeological monitoring shall be conducted by an archaeologist familiar with the types of archaeological resources that could be encountered within the project site. The archaeological monitor shall be empowered to halt or redirect ground - disturbing activities away from the vicinity of a discovery until the qualified archaeologist has evaluated the discovery and determined appropriate treatment. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily logs detailing the types of activities and soils observed, and any discoveries. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring. The report shall be submitted to the City and any Native American groups who request a copy. A copy of the final report shall be filed at the SCCIC. With the implementation of Mitigation measures CUL -1 and CUL -2, project implementation would result in a less than significant impact involving an adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. E SL k ..A Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 8 Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the cultural resources evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Geology and Soils As concluded in the IS/MND for the previous analyzed project, the revised project would not result in impacts associated with rupture of a known earthquake fault, landslides, and waste water disposal systems. Similar to the conclusions in the IS/MND for the previous analyzed project, the revised project would result in less than significant impacts associated with seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, erosion or the loss of top soil, unstable soil, and expansive soils. The project would include implementation of Standard Condition SC -4.6-1 to further ensure less than significant impacts related to ground shaking and unstable soils. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the geology and soils evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Greenhouse Gas As determined in the IS/MND for the previous analyzed project, the net change in GHG emissions resulting from the revised project implementation (which would be an increase in annual emissions from existing emissions of 741.11 MTCOze per year) is considered to be less than significant. Similarly, the revised project would not conflict with the California Air Resources Board (CARB)'s Scoping Plan, and the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). Impacts would be less than significant. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the greenhouse gas evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials The IS/MND for the previous project determined that there would be no impacts related to hazardous materials emissions or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, safety hazard for people residing or working in the vicinity of a private air strip, exposure to wildfires. Similarly, the revised project would result in no impacts to these issue areas. The IS/MND for the previous analyzed project concluded less than significant impacts related to a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, hazardous materials sites, safety within an airport land use plan, and interference with adopted emergency response and evacuation plans. Similarly, the revised project would result in less than significant impacts to these issue areas. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the hazards and hazardous materials evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Hydrology and Water Quality Similar to the previous project, the revised project would be required to comply with the NPDES and CMMC during construction. Under both projects, the existing site has more impervious surfaces than the proposed conditions, therefore offsite runoff and peak flows would be lower for the proposed condition than in the existing condition. The revised project would similarly implement BMPs. Similar to the previous project, the revised project's first finished floor would be elevated above the base flood elevation indicated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map effective height. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would not result in impacts to water quality standards, groundwater supplies, drainage patterns, alteration of a course of a stream or river, and stormwater runoff. Because the project site is the same as the previous project, impact conclusions for the revised project related to flooding, inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow would be the same as what was determined for the previous project. This determination is less than significant. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the hydrology and water quality evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. --222- E1. ,t Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 10 Land Use and Land Use Planning As concluded in the IS/MND, the previous analyzed project would not result in impacts that would physically divide an established community or conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. The previous analyzed project would be consistent with the applicable goals and objectives outlined in the City's General Plan. However, the proposed project is subject to the development standards outlined in the City's Zoning Code and the applicable standards outlined in the JWA's AELUP. The analysis determined that the previous project's interior noise at the proposed food hall would exceed the 55 decibels (dBA) standard which could result in a potentially significant impact. The proposed project's interior noise at the proposed office within the self -storage facility would exceed the 50 dBA standard which could result in a potentially significant impact. The analysis of the previous project found that the previously proposed food hall and office within the storage building could be exposed to noise levels that could represent a significant impact. With the revised project, no food hall is proposed and therefore, no noise mitigation related to the food hall is required. The revised project includes an office within the storage building and therefore, potential significant noise impacts on the office could occur. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would implement the following mitigation measure. Mitigation Measures N0I-2: Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall show evidence, and the Development Services Director shall approve, an alternative form of ventilation, such as air conditioning systems or noise -attenuated passive ventilation, shall be included in the building design of the proposed office within the self -storage facility to ensure that windows can remain closed for prolonged periods of time in order to meet the office interior noise standard of 50 dBA CNEL established by the City. In addition, prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall show evidence, and the Development Services Director shall approve, that all project wall assemblies (windows, doors, and wall combinations) have been designed and will be constructed to meet the interior noise standard of 50 dBA CNEL. Mitigation Measure NOI-2 would reduce the potential noise impact to less than significant. In order to meet the interior noise standard for office building of 50 dBA, at least 26 dBA of exterior to interior noise reduction would be required for the proposed office within the self -storage facility. Mitigation measures to incorporate such design would reduce potential impacts to less than significant. The revised project would similarly not physically divide an established community or would not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. The revised project would be subject to the development standards outlined in the City's Zoning Code and the applicable standards outlined in ESA Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page I 1 the JWA's AELUP. The Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUP) reviewed the project with respect to compliance with the AELUP for JWA, including review of noise, height restrictions, imaginary surfaces, safety zones, solar glare, and environmental compliance. During the review process, the City and applicant agreed that no new structures would be constructed within the RPZ and/or Safety Zone 2. The Commission found the project consistent with the AELUP for JWA. Therefore, the conclusion for the revised project would be the same as what was determined for the previous project. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the land use evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Mineral Resources Similar to the previous project, development of the proposed project would not have a significant impact to mineral resources. The revised project would not result in impacts that would result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state or result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan. No impacts would occur. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the mineral resources evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Noise The previous project was found to generate construction noise and operational noise on and off the project site. Construction activities associated with the previous project was found to be less than significant because these activities were planned to take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. These construction time frames are consistent with the City's noise ordinance. Construction activities associated with the revised project would also occur during the above time and therefore, potential construction noise impacts would be less than significant. The previous project was found to generate long-term noise on off-site noise sensitive receivers due to vehicular activity in the parking lot and potential rooftop HVAC (Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning) units. The vehicular activities were determined to generate minimal noise levels and would be less than significant. Based -22�1 " ES,k. A Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 12 on the location of the HVAC units, long-term noise levels would be less than 40 dBA which would be a less than significant noise impact. Similar to the previous project, HVAC units would be no closer to the off-site noise sensitive uses as the previous project. Therefore, long-term noise levels would also be less than significant. The analysis of the previous project found that the previously proposed food hall and office within the storage building could be exposed to noise levels that could represent a significant impact. With the revised project, no food hall is proposed and therefore, no noise mitigation related to the food hall is required. The revised project includes an office within the storage building and therefore, potential significant noise impacts on the office could occur. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would implement the following mitigation measure. Mitigation Measures NOI-2: Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall show evidence, and the Development Services Director shall approve, an alternative form of ventilation, such as air conditioning systems or noise -attenuated passive ventilation, shall be included in the building design of the proposed office within the self -storage facility to ensure that windows can remain closed for prolonged periods of time in order to meet the office interior noise standard of 50 dBA CNEL established by the City. In addition, prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall show evidence, and the Development Services Director shall approve, that all project wall assemblies (windows, doors, and wall combinations) have been designed and will be constructed to meet the interior noise standard of 50 dBA CNEL. Mitigation Measure NOI-2 would reduce the potential noise impact to less than significant. In order to meet the interior noise standard for office building of 50 dBA, at least 26 dBA of exterior to interior noise reduction would be required for the proposed office within the self -storage facility. Mitigation measures to incorporate such design would reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the noise evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Population and Housing The previous project was found to result in temporary employment during construction and permanent employment during operation. The on-site workforce for construction was expected to be negligible for a short duration. The construction workers would likely come from the existing labor pool in the general vicinity, and therefore would not generate additional growth in the area. The long-term employment associated with the previous _--_ Z -2s 1 ESA Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 13 project was offset by the removal of existing employment on the project site. As a result, the previous project would not have trigger substantial growth in the area. Similar to the previous project, the revised project includes a self -storage facility; however, the proposed facility would be smaller in size compared to the previous project. In addition, the revised project would not include a food court. The revised project includes the retention of some of the existing uses on the project site. As with the previous project, temporary and long-term employment associated with the revised project would not trigger substantial growth in the area, and impacts related to population growth would be less than significant. Similar to the previous project, the proposed project would not displace housing because there are no housing units on the project site. The revised project includes the retention of some of the uses on the project site and would not result in the displacement of a substantial number of people from the demolition of the remaining uses on the project site. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the population and housing evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Public Services The previous project was found to increase the demand of fire and police protection services. This increase would occur; however, it would be minimized by the removal of the existing use on the project site. Because increases in service demand would not be substantial, no expansion or construction of new fire or police station locations would be required to serve the new development. Therefore, less -than -significant impacts would occur with the previous project. With the revised project, less new development would be proposed and some of the existing uses would remain on the project site. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would not substantially increase demand on the project site and no expansion or construction of new fire or police station locations would be required to serve the new development. Therefore, similar to the previous project less -than -significant impacts would occur with the revised project. The previous project was found to result in no impacts on schools, parks, and other public facilities because the project would not increase the residential or student population in the area to demand these services. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would also not increase the residential or student population and not increase the demand for these services. There would be no impacts to these services. —224�)__._ E SA Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 14 Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the public services evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Recreation Because the previous project did not include a residential population, the revised project was found to not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated. In addition, the previous project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would not deteriorate or accelerate the deterioration of existing recreational facilities. In addition, the revised project would not require new recreational facilities. The revised project would result in no impacts to recreational facilities. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the recreation evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Transportation and Traffic The previous project was estimated to generate approximately 886 trips per day, but after removing the traffic volumes associated with the existing uses (1,228 daily trips), the previous project was found to reduce the existing total daily trips from the site. The analysis found that during the morning peak hour the previous project would increase traffic by 8 peak trips. Under the revised project, new retail (food services) would not be included on the project site. The project would retain a few of the existing establishments on the project site (some of which includes food services). In addition, the revised project would also include fewer storage units. The revised project would generate approximately 709 daily trips (proposed and existing uses to remain onsite), but after removing the traffic volumes associated with the existing uses (1,228 daily trips), fewer daily trips would occur under the revised project compared to the previous project. In addition, the revised project would result in a decrease in the morning and evening peak hour trips compared to the previous project. With a decrease in daily and peak hour traffic volumes, the revised project would result in less than significant traffic impacts similar to the findings of the previous project. 22--7— ESA Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 15 Similar to the previous project, the revised project would not have an impact on the issues related to a change in air traffic patterns, increased hazards due to a design feature, adequacy of emergency access, or conflicts with adopted transportation plans. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the traffic and transportation evaluation provided in the Bristol Mini -Storage Facility and Food Court Building MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Utilities and Service Systems The previous project would result in a nominal increase in wastewater generation and water demand. Based on this nominal increase, the previous project was found to result in less than significant impacts on wastewater treatment facilities as well as existing sewer and water pipeline facilities. Because the revised project would result in less new development compared to the previous project, the revised project would also result in less than significant impacts on wastewater treatment facilities and existing sewer and water pipeline facilities. The previous project included on-site stormwater drainage facilities that would convey stormwater to on-site filtration planter boxes, where the stormwater would be filtered, then discharged off-site. Potential impacts to existing off-site stormwater drainage facilities were found to be less than significant. Similar to the previous project, the revised project would include similar on-site drainage facilities, and impacts to existing off-site facilities would be less than significant. The previous project would include the generation of solid waste during demolition activities and minimal solid waste during operation and maintenance of the previously proposed self -storage facility and food court uses. The revised project does not include the food court uses, but does include the retention of some of the existing retail uses. Overall, the revised project would result in a similar less than significant impact on landfill facilities as the previous project. Summary No new significant effects or substantial changes to the utilities and service systems evaluation provided in the IS/MND would occur with the implementation of the revised project. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. EkS1k .A Mr. Lee September 27, 2016 Page 16 Conclusion Based on the information above, the revised project would result in no new significant effects or substantial changes to the environmental evaluations from the previous project's IS/MND. In addition, no new mitigation measures are required with the revised project. Because no substantial revisions are required of the previous project's IS/MND, the circumstances identified within the CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5 requiring recirculation of the IS/MND are not present. Further, as identified in the environmental evaluation above, all mitigation measures applicable to the revised project are located within the previous project's IS/MND. Sincerely, Arabesque Said-Abdelwahed, MPP Senior Associate -2-24- AL 7 - ✓;ice T . �.• D raft BRISTOL MINI -STORAGE FACILITY (744 UNITS) AND FOOD COURT BUILDING (5,000 SQ. FT.) nitial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for City of Costa Mesa 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Irvine Oakland Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 150652 May 2016 ESA TABLE OF CONTENTS Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Paqe Section 1: Introduction...........................................................................................................1 1.1 Statutory Authority and Requirements..........................................................1 1.2 Purpose..........................................................................................................1 1.3 Incorporation by Reference...........................................................................2 Section 2: Project Description...............................................................................................3 2.1 Project Location.............................................................................................3 2.2 Environmental Setting...................................................................................3 2.3 Project Features............................................................................................7 2.4 Construction Activities and Grading............................................................18 2.5 Project Approvals.........................................................................................18 Section 3: Initial Study Checklist.........................................................................................19 3.1 Background..................................................................................................19 3.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ................................................20 3.3 Lead Agency Determination........................................................................20 Section 4: Environmental Analysis.....................................................................................21 4.1 Aesthetics....................................................................................................22 4.2 Agricultural and Forest Resources..............................................................25 4.3 Air Quality....................................................................................................27 4.4 Biological Resources...................................................................................35 4.5 Cultural Resources......................................................................................39 4.6 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity....................................................................44 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions........................................................................49 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials..............................................................52 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality.......................................................................58 4.10 Land Use and Land Use Planning...............................................................65 4.11 Mineral Resources.......................................................................................72 4.12 Noise............................................................................................................73 4.13 Population and Housing..............................................................................85 4.14 Public Services............................................................................................87 4.15 Recreation....................................................................................................90 4.16 Transportation and Traffic...........................................................................91 4.17 Utilities and Service Systems......................................................................96 4.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance ..........................................................102 Section 5: Consultant Recommendation..........................................................................104 Section 6: Report Preparation Personnel.........................................................................105 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) I ESA / 150652 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Appendices Appendix A: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Modeling Data Appendix B: Biological Data Search Results Appendix C: Cultural Resources Appendix D: Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Appendix E: Hydrology Appendix F: Transportation and Traffic Data Figures Figure 1 Regional Location Map...........................................................................................4 Figure 2 Study Area Map — Topographic Base.....................................................................5 Figure 3 Study Area Map — Aerial Base................................................................................6 32 Figure4Site Plan..................................................................................................................8 Figure 5a Ground Floor Plan...................................................................................................9 Figure 5b Second Storage Floor Plan...................................................................................10 Figure6a Rendered Views....................................................................................................12 Figure6b Rendered Views....................................................................................................13 Figure 6c Rendered Views....................................................................................................14 Figure6d Rendered Views....................................................................................................15 Tables Table 4.3-1 Proposed Regional Construction Emissions..................................................28 Table 4.3-2 Proposed project Operational Emissions.......................................................29 Table 4.3-3 Proposed Project Unmitigated Localized daily Construction Emissions ........ 32 Table 4.3-4 Proposed project Localized Operational Emissions.......................................32 Table 4.7-1 Estimated Construction and Operations -Related GHG Emissions................50 Table 4.10-1 Consistency with General Commercial Standards.........................................68 Table 4.12-1 Residential Noise Standards..........................................................................76 Table 4.12-2 Noise and Land Use Compatibility Matrix......................................................76 Table 4.12-3 Construction Vibration Damage Criteria.........................................................80 Table 4.12-4 Groundborne Vibration Impact Criteria for General Assessment...................80 Table 4.12-5 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment.....................................81 Table 4.12-6 Typical Construction Noise Levels at 50 feet.................................................82 Table 4.16-1 Project traffic Generation Forecast................................................................92 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) II ESA / 150652 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Section 1: Introduction The City of Costa Mesa (City) has determined the proposed Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 -square -foot (sq. ft.)) Project (project) is subject to the guidelines and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Initial Study addresses the indirect, direct, and cumulative environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The proposed project includes the demolition of an existing automotive strip mall and development of a self -storage facility and food hall. The project would be located within a 3.2 -acre parcel. The proposed project includes rezone of the 3.2 -acre site from Planned Development Commercial (PDC) to General Commercial (C2). 1.1 Statutory Authority and Requirements In accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21177) and pursuant to Section 15063 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), the City of Costa Mesa, acting in the capacity of Lead Agency, is required to undertake the preparation of an Initial Study to determine if the proposed project would have a significant environmental impact. If the Lead Agency finds that there is no evidence that the project, either as proposed or as modified to include the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study, may cause a significant effect on the environment, the Lead Agency must find that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment and must prepare a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for that project. Such determination can be made only if "there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Lead Agency" that such impacts may occur (Section 21080(c), Public Resources Code). The environmental documentation is intended as an informal document undertaken to provide an environmental basis for subsequent discretionary actions upon the project. The resulting documentation is not, however, a policy document and its approval and/or certification neither presupposes nor mandates any actions on the part of those agencies from whom permits and other discretionary approvals would be required. The environmental documentation and supporting analysis is subject to a public review period. During this review, public agency comments on the document should be addressed to the City of Costa Mesa. Following review of any comments received, the City of Costa Mesa will consider these comments as part of the project's environmental review and include them with the Initial Study documentation for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of Costa Mesa. 1.2 Purpose The City of Costa Mesa has prepared this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to provide the public and responsible agencies with information about the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.). This IS/MND includes project -level analysis of the proposed self - storage facility and food hall. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 This IS/MND was prepared in compliance with Sections 15070 to 15075 of the State CEQA Guidelines of 1970 (as amended) and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division, Chapter 3. In accordance with Section 15070, an MND shall be prepared if the Initial Study identifies potentially significant effects, but revisions in the project plans would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. As the CEQA lead agency, the City has determined that an IS/MND shall be prepared for the proposed project. 1.3 Incorporation by Reference Documents relating to this IS/MND have been cited and incorporated, in accordance with Sections 15148 and 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines. This incorporation eliminates the need for inclusion of voluminous engineering and technical reports within the IS/MND. The documents are available for review at the City of Costa Mesa Development Services Department located at 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, California 92626, and online at www.costamesacagov. City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan (Adopted January 22, 2002). The City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan (General Plan) is the primary source of long-range planning and policy direction intended to guide growth and preserve the quality of life within the community. The General Plan contains goals, policies, and plans that are intended to guide land use and development decisions. It consists of a Land Use Plan Map and the following Elements, which together fulfill the state requirements for a General Plan: Land Use; Circulation/Transportation; Housing; Conservation; Noise; Safety; Open Space and Recreation; Growth Management; Community Design; and Historic and Cultural Resources. The General Plan was used throughout this IS/MND as a source of baseline data. According to the current (2013-2021) Housing Element (City of Costa Mesa 2008), as of 2010, there were 39,946 households within 16 square miles in the City. City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan Environmental Impact Report. The City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan Enviromnental Impact Report (EIR) was certified on January 22, 2002, through City Council Resolution No. 02-07. The General Plan EIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts that would result from implementation of the City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan. General Plan EIR Table 3-6, Growth Increases Over Existing Conditions (2000) Associated with 2000 General Plan Implementation (2020), identifies new development projected between 2000 and 2020. The environmental impact analysis contained in the General Plan EIR assumes 42,469 dwelling units and 46,683,237 sf of non-residential land uses, which represents a growth of 1,892 additional dwelling units and 12,643,695 additional sf of non-residential uses by 2020. The General Plan EIR concluded that impacts in the following areas would be significant and unavoidable (see General Plan EIR Section 8.0): Transportation and Circulation (roadway capacity at Bristol Street, east of Red Hills Avenue • Noise (long-term mobile sources) • Air Quality (short- and long-term emissions) The General Plan and General Plan EIR were used in this IS/MND as a source of baseline data. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 2 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 City of Costa Mesa Municipal Code. The City of Costa Mesa Municipal Code (CMMC) consists of regulatory, penal, and administrative ordinances of the City of Costa Mesa. It is the method the City uses to implement control of land uses, in accordance with General Plan goals and policies. The City of Costa Mesa Zoning Code is found in CMMC Title 13, Planning, Zoning, and Development. The purpose of CMMC Title 13 is to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and preserve and enhance the aesthetic quality of the city by providing regulations to ensure that an appropriate mix of land uses occur in an orderly manner. The CMMC and CMMC Title 13 are referenced throughout this Initial Study for descriptions and requirements of the City's regulatory framework. Section 2: Project Description 2.1 Project Location The project site is located in the eastern portion of the City of Costa Mesa, in Orange County. The site is approximately one mile east of State Route (SR) 55 and immediately south of SR -73. Specifically, the site is located at the southern end of Bristol Street west of Campus Drive where the road splits into a frontage road along SR -73 at 375 Bristol Street (see Figures 1, 2, and 3). 2.2 Environmental Setting The project area is developed with urban uses that include commercial, residential, and recreational uses. The project site consists of one parcel, which totals 3.2 acres of land. The site is relatively flat with on-site elevation of approximately 30 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The site is currently developed with an automotive strip mall called Autoplex constructed in or shortly after 1987. The automotive strip mall consists of three buildings with multiple tenants and an associated parking lot. Primary site access is provided via Bristol Street. The site is not set back from the adjacent property to the west. The 55 -foot -wide concrete Santa Ana Delhi Channel Watershed borders the southern portion of the project site. A buffer of 70 feet separates the project site to the nearest residence. On-site water and sewer are provided by Mesa Water District and Costa Mesa Sanitary District. 2.2.1 General Plan and Zoning General Plan According to the City of Costa Mesa General Plan Land Use Map, the site is designated as General Commercial. The General Commercial designation is intended to permit a wide range of commercial which serve both local and regional needs. Zoning The project site is currently zoned Planned Development Commercial (PDC). The project applicant proposes to amend the existing zoning to General Business District (C2) to accommodate the proposed project. General Business District allows for the proposed mini warehouse and food hall use. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 3 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Huntington Park 42 Compton O7 19 Long Beach SOURCE: ESRI La Puente ii- I Los Angeles County `I San f 72 142 Bernardino IV Orange County County ' Norwalk Riverside County r- Fullerton J 1 J Ana�he,m Orange \ r Cypress CI�e eland Nationale Santa Ana 55 © Forest Huntington Beach Project Location Irvine O1 73 Newport Beach 133 74 Pacific Ocean Orange County I San Diego County I I — Costa Mesa IS/MND.150652 Figure 1 Regional Location Map Brar St S • . �� 1'� / �' -� Soh • i i � 1 � -- • ♦ ..� � St John the ksDtint . ■ � i r Aik- _' Ilii •�� ��� i1„?� ,,� ,41 is HAN/JFiI.�_. ■ -NU'44 ,. ♦ , ;%� �� �� ,'+r y• �Cj KSS as�<O _ —Sitd:V PF.[>(Dr4 _46 = _ Rar. ♦ �. 1L�lipwt / i✓ ,O 1-Z I� `' '' / / / • ♦ f.18c say ' / HK _ t E h�• • G AYNE n: Fl,tRGkpUNCS Q.�•f. v: � � �' • ♦� S,,tz Project Location, <fJ Utz O� _O d 63 r i . aan Joaq:- •�Ci/�u uGurr, crul it 4. Salt S vl �Ev-a-po-r-a-JptsX Project Location o 2,000 i s Feet ;; SOURCE: ESRI Costa Mesa IS/MND.150652 Figure 2 Study Area Map - Topographic Base 7 - — II I 1c, , vp� I � 405 ti cortez Presidio Dr Arlington Dr "I The proposed zoning is consistent with the existing General Plan General Commercial land use designation which allows the proposed mini warehouse and the food hall use. 2.2.2 Existing Surrounding Land Uses Land uses surrounding the project site include commercial and residential. Land uses immediately adjacent to the project site consist of the following: North: Bristol Street and SR 73 are located north of the project site. East: The Newport Beach Gold Course is located immediately east of the project site. This property is zoned as Open Space per the City of Newport Beach Zoning Map (City of Newport Beach, 2010). South: The Santa Ana Delhi Channel is located immediately south of the project site. A residential neighborhood is located south of the channel. The residential neighborhood is zoned Santa Ana Heights Specific Plan per the City of Newport Beach Zoning Map (City of Newport Beach, 2010). West: A commercial strip mall with multiple tenants including bridal cakes shop and bridal salon are located immediately to the west. Currently, there is no setback between the existing building on the project site and the existing building on the adjacent property. 2.3 Project Features The proposed project includes the development of a two-story self -storage facility and food hall at 375 Bristol Avenue (Figure 4). The proposed project requires City of Costa Mesa approval of the Conditional Use Permit, zone change from PDC to C2, Demolition Permit, Grading Permit, and Building Permit(s). The project components are further described and in the following pages. 2.3.1 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) Project The City of Costa Mesa is processing a planning application from Sanderson J Ray Development for demolition of an existing 37,883 sf multi -tenant automotive center, and the development of a two-story, 38,000 sf, 744 -unit self -storage facility with a freestanding 5,000 sf multi -tenant food court pad building. The project would include a 1,200 sf ground -floor management office (100,000 sf total). The proposed food vendor mix is planned to be local chef/entrepreneurs providing unique offerings that will provide Costa Mesa residents with additional high-quality food choices. The space is planned to provide long-term flexibility to easily change the stall sizes as the tenant mix and market changes. The range of number of operators could be from a single tenant up to seven smaller lease spaces, as illustrated in Figure 5. Similar kitchen and food preparation arrangements are located locally at the Fourth Street Market in the city of Santa Ana and the Anaheim Packing District in the city of Anaheim. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 7 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 SOURCE: Wiley Architects N NOT TO SCALE Costa Mesa IS/MND . 150652 Figure 4 Site Plan SCALE SOURCE: Wiley Architects OFFICE .. a 9/" � i �: � �� ��� •Y~•` O O O O O ir 11111 ii ::« iiiiiiiiiiii�.►'/ilio/ilii%� K N NOT TO SCALE Costa Mesa IS/MND . 150652 Figure 5a Ground Floor Plan SCALE 0 W 20' 50' 100' ;GALE: 1/18"=1'A" --.- SOURCE: Wiley Architects K N NOT TO SCALE Costa Mesa IS/MND . 150652 Figure 5b Second Floor Plan Architectural Features The proposed architecture would include a prominent foreground building centrally located at the front of the project site along Bristol Street. The design of the building recalls the characteristics of adaptive re -use food halls with a clear abstract architectural form. The proposed colors are rich, dark wood exterior siding, with earthen tones including tan, charcoal grays, and white. Elevations of the proposed buildings are provided in Figures 6a through Figure 6d. Side and Rear Yard Setbacks There are two entrances to the project site, both located along Bristol Street. The project includes a 25 -foot front setback from the property line along Bristol Street to the proposed food court building and a minimum 68 -foot setback from the property line along Bristol Street to the proposed mini -storage facility. The project includes a minimum 26 -foot, 4 -inch and 36 -foot side setbacks on the project site's eastern and western boundaries, respectively. The adjacent building west of the project site is located on the existing property line and has a 0 -foot setback. On the east side, there are no structures immediately adjacent to the project site. The proposed rear setback would be a minimum of 33 feet, 1 inch from the proposed building to the rear property line. Currently, the rear setback is a minimum of 30 feet from the existing building to the rear property line. Green Initiatives The proposed project includes energy efficient features and design elements aimed at reducing energy consumption to net zero and reducing water use. These features and elements include: • Cool roofs that avoid heat gain • Naturally ventilated building • Rooftop solar panels • Energy efficient lighting, including low-energy light -emitting diode (LED) lighting and daylighting • Use of sustainable materials with recycled content • Native, drought -tolerant landscaping • Vegetated swales, pervious pavement for stormwater capture, filtration • Urban garden Drainage The project site is lower in elevation than the adjacent Bristol Street to the north. Currently, stormwater drains directly into grate inlets in the drive aisles, parking lots and interior courtyards. The existing storm drain flows from the north to south into the Santa Ana -Delhi Channel south of the project. This concrete channel then flows easterly and southerly through the Newport Beach golf course property which then connects into Upper Newport Bay. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 11 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 r FiW4if pow - I, A , I AZT i 11 Costa Mesa IS/MND . 150652 SOURCE: Wiley Architects Figure 6a Rendered Views 3FtISTOL Si REET m - �� - BI6510� 6�Rf[i uyF � MK Er _- 3 SOURCE: Wiley Architects LD Costa Mesa IS/MND . 150652 Figure 6c Rendered Views Mot _ ARAM �r BRisTOL STORAGE �M ONE" l� t Ir _ mom-mi— imp1� f -'F A "ff77 The project is located in potential areas of erosions, habitat and physical structure susceptibility. The site is located in an area of low infiltration which classifies the soil as being soil group D (infiltration rate approximately 0.20 in/hour). Infiltration on site is not feasible because of the low infiltration rate of the underlying soil. As the site cannot support infiltration, biofiltration methods are proposed in the design of the proposed project. The proposed site runoff would be directed into biofiltration areas before discharging into the storm drain system. The existing 18 -inch on-site storm drain would be relocated away from the proposed structures and placed within a proposed sidewalk and on-site traffic circulation system. The 18 -inch on-site storm drain system would collect stormwater from the eastern half of the project site. Existing 6 -inch, 12 -inch, and 18 -inch on-site storm drain would remain it their current locations and continue to collect stormwater from the western half of the project site. The 18 -inch on-site storm drain in the eastern portion of the project site would convey stormwater to the existing Santa Ana -Delhi channel near the southeastern corner of the project site. The 18 -inch on-site storm drain in the southwestern portion of the project site would convey stormwater to the Santa Ana -Delhi channel in the southern portion of the project site. The location of the storm drains and outlets to the Santa Ana -Delhi channel are shown on Figure 7. Access and Parking Vehicle access would be provided to the project via two 25 -foot -wide driveways along Bristol Street. The two driveways connect into an asphalt -paved driveway that provides access to the parking and loading areas. The proposed project would include 5 open parking spaces for the office building (4 spaces per 1,000 sf), 54 open parking spaces for the restaurant (10 spaces per 1,000 sf and 12 spaces per 1,000 sf over 3,000 sf), and 4 parking spaces would be provided for the storage facility (1 space for every 200 units). Four Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)— compliant parking spaces would be provided in front of the office entrance and in front of the restaurant entrance. Additionally, 11 recreational vehicle (RV) storage units would be located along the southwestern project boundary. Pedestrian access into the proposed self -storage facility would be provided by an accessible path from the public sidewalk along Bristol Street. A 5 -foot -wide pedestrian path would surround the two-story self -storage building. The units within the second story would be accessible via four entryways to the stairwell along the pedestrian path. Trip Generation Analysis Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) estimated project trip generation as part of the project -specific Trip Generation Assessment (LL&F 2015). The proposed project would generate 886 daily trips, with 68 trips produced in the AM peak hour and 75 trips produced in the PM peak hour. The existing land use currently generates 1,228 trips per day (sum of both directions), with 60 trips generated during the AM peak hour and 95 trips generated during the PM peak hour. When the proposed project is compared to the existing "occupied floor area," the project is forecast to result in 342 fewer daily trips, 8 additional AM peak hour trips, and 20 fewer PM peak hour trips Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 16 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 SOURCE: PSOMAS 2016 Costa Mesa IS/MND. 150652 Figure 7 Drainage Plan MI. MWA .. . . . . . .. . I��!�.'� . . . . . . . . . . I I . . .. I I I ��� �; �, ��,,I,v��� �" ��� !, � III�I� III�I ! I all�� mini. --------- - --------- M_O SOURCE: PSOMAS 2016 Costa Mesa IS/MND. 150652 Figure 7 Drainage Plan 2.4 Construction Activities and Grading The project includes demolition and removal of approximately 37,883 sf of existing buildings located on the project site, and removal of associated asphalt parking lot. Prior to demolition of the existing structures, removal of any hazardous materials associated with the existing building operations shall be conducted in accordance with state and local regulations. Once demolition is completed, the project site would be graded and constructed in a single phase. A Construction Access and Circulation Plan would be submitted to ensure that construction traffic would not affect Bristol Street and other access routes. Project construction is estimated to occur in one phase over a total duration of 16 months. Demolition is expected to last from October to November 2017. Construction of the facility, including grading and vertical construction, will occur for 14 months from December 2017 to January 2019. 2.5 Project Approvals The City of Costa Mesa, as Lead Agency for the project, has discretionary authority over the project. In order to implement this project, the Applicant would need to obtain, at a minimum, the following permits/approvals: • Planning Commission approval of the IS/MND • Demolition Permits • Grading and Building Permits to grade and construct the project • Site Plan approval from the Costa Mesa Fire Department and Sanitary District • On-site utility plans 2.5.1 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required • South Coast Air Basin • Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Region 8 • Mesa Water District Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 18 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Section 3: Initial Study Checklist 3.1 Background 1. Project Title: Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) Project 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Costa Mesa Development Services Department 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Melvin E. Lee, AICP 714.754.5611 4. Project Location: 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Sanderson J. Ray Development 6. General Plan Designation(s): General Commercial 7. Zoning: Planned Development Commercial (PDC) (Existing) General Business District (C2) (Proposed) 8. Description of the Project: The project proposed consists of the development of a two-story, 105,000 square foot, self - storage facility and food hall on a 3.2 -acre parcel of land. The proposed buildings would have dark wood exterior siding, earth -toned plaster walls, and a custom -fabricated metal fagade. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is within a commercial development area surrounded by the John Wayne Airport, residential, commercial, and a recreational land use (Newport Beach Golf Course). 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits): South Coast Air Quality Management District Regional Water Quality Control Board, District 8 Mesa Water District Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 19 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 3.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The proposed project could potentially affect the environmental factor(s) checked below. The following pages present a more detailed checklist and discussion of each environmental factor. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology, Soils and Seismicity ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology and Water Quality ❑ Land Use and Land Use Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation and Traffic ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance Note: None of the environmental factors were checked because the proposed project would not result in any potential significant impacts after the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. 3.3 Lead Agency Determination On the basis of this Initial Study: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, no further environmental documentation is required. Signature Date Printed Name For Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 20 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Section 4: Environmental Analysis Sections 4.1 through 4.18 analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the project. The environmental issue areas that are evaluated are: • Aesthetics • Agriculture and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology/Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards/Hazardous Materials • Hydrology/Water Quality • Land Use/Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population/Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation/Traffic • Utilities/Services Systems • Mandatory Findings of Significance The environmental analysis in the following sections is patterned after the Initial Study Checklist recommended by the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, and used by the City of Costa Mesa in its environmental review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to more fully analyze the development's impacts and to identify mitigation. For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated and an answer is provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. The analysis considers the long-term, direct, and indirect impacts of the development. To each question, there are four possible responses: • No Impact. The development will not have any measurable environmental impact on the environment. • Less -than -significant impact. The development will have the potential for impacting the environment, although this impact will be below established thresholds that are considered to be significant. • Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The development will have the potential to generate impacts, which may be considered as a significant effect on the environment, although mitigation measures or changes to the development's physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. • Potentially significant impact. The development could have impacts, which may be considered significant, and therefore additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce potentially significant impacts to less -than -significant levels. The following is a discussion of potential project impacts as identified in the Initial Study/ Environmental Checklist. Explanations are provided for each item. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 21 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.1 Aesthetics Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. A scenic vista is defined as a view of an area that is visually or aesthetically pleasing. Aesthetic components of a scenic vista include (1) scenic quality, (2) sensitivity level, and (3) view access. The project area is within a highly developed and urbanized area. Based on a review of the City of Costa Mesa General Plan, the project site is not identified as a scenic vista (Costa Mesa, 2000). There are no officially designated scenic vistas in the City. Based on a review of the County of Orange General Plan and the Newport Beach General Plan, the areas adjacent to the project site are not listed as scenic vistas. Therefore, implementation of the project would not have an effect on a designated scenic view or vista. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. Based on a review of the California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) List of scenic highways, the project site is not located along a State Scenic Highway. There are no officially designated state scenic highways in the vicinity of the project site (Caltrans, 2015). The nearest officially designated state scenic highway is a portion of SR -91, approximately 13 miles north of the project site. There are two eligible, but not officially designated state scenic state highways within Orange County; SR -1, approximately 3 miles east, and SR -74, approximately 17 miles south of the project site (Caltrans, 2015). Additionally, as described under impact 5.a) below, there are no recorded historical resources located within or adjacent to the project site. Further, the proposed project site is relatively flat and surrounded by an urban built environment, and there are no other scenic resources, including trees and rock outcroppings, within or adjacent to the project area. Therefore, impacts related to scenic resources within a state scenic highway would not occur. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 22 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 1. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, ❑ ❑ ❑ but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ❑ ❑ quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare ❑ ❑ which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. A scenic vista is defined as a view of an area that is visually or aesthetically pleasing. Aesthetic components of a scenic vista include (1) scenic quality, (2) sensitivity level, and (3) view access. The project area is within a highly developed and urbanized area. Based on a review of the City of Costa Mesa General Plan, the project site is not identified as a scenic vista (Costa Mesa, 2000). There are no officially designated scenic vistas in the City. Based on a review of the County of Orange General Plan and the Newport Beach General Plan, the areas adjacent to the project site are not listed as scenic vistas. Therefore, implementation of the project would not have an effect on a designated scenic view or vista. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. Based on a review of the California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) List of scenic highways, the project site is not located along a State Scenic Highway. There are no officially designated state scenic highways in the vicinity of the project site (Caltrans, 2015). The nearest officially designated state scenic highway is a portion of SR -91, approximately 13 miles north of the project site. There are two eligible, but not officially designated state scenic state highways within Orange County; SR -1, approximately 3 miles east, and SR -74, approximately 17 miles south of the project site (Caltrans, 2015). Additionally, as described under impact 5.a) below, there are no recorded historical resources located within or adjacent to the project site. Further, the proposed project site is relatively flat and surrounded by an urban built environment, and there are no other scenic resources, including trees and rock outcroppings, within or adjacent to the project area. Therefore, impacts related to scenic resources within a state scenic highway would not occur. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 22 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would result in the demolition of an existing 37,883 square foot one-story multi -tenant automotive center and the development of a two-story, 98,800 square foot, self -storage facility and food court. The proposed buildings would have dark wood exterior siding, earth -toned plaster walls, and a custom -fabricated metal fagade. A 6 -foot -high concrete block wall along the southern boundary would remain. Additionally, a new 4 -foot -tall concrete masonry unit retaining wall would be placed below ground level adjacent to the proposed biofiltration planters located along the entire length of the southern boundary of the project site. The proposed landscape plan includes low- water and drought -tolerant species, such as agaves and swaths of native grass. The new landscaping would replace the existing lawn on the landscape strip along the sidewalk. Vertical planting along the north elevation of the storage building would cover portions of the lower wall. Entries to the storage units along the north would be softened and screened by these plantings. The existing palms and landscaping will be relocated in compliance with the Costa Mesa General Plan Community Design Element. The visual quality of the project site and surrounding areas generally consists of commercial, recreational, and medium density residential development. The proposed project would be dissimilar in scale to the site's surroundings. However, project implementation would enhance the character of the surrounding area through quality architectural design and through reinforcing the commercial quality along Bristol Street. As mentioned above, there are no unique or scenic visual resources within or around the project site. A project is considered to have a significant aesthetic impact if it substantially changes the character of the site and/or becomes visually incompatible when viewed with surrounding areas. The proposed project would be in compliance with the City's Development Standards; therefore, it would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, and the impact would be less than significant. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact. Light Impacts There are two primary sources of light: light emanating from building interiors that pass through windows and light from exterior sources (e.g., street lighting, parking lot lighting, building illumination, security lighting, and landscape lighting). Depending upon the location of the light source and its proximity to adjacent light-sensitive uses, light introduction can be a nuisance, affecting adjacent areas and diminishing the view of the clear night sky. Light spillage is typically defined as unwanted illumination from light fixtures on adjacent properties. The project site is located within a commercial and residential area. Existing lighting conditions in the project area include light emanating from building interiors, security lights and the surrounding commercial and residential land uses, as well as nearby street lighting. There are Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 23 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 residential uses located south of the project site and south of the Santa Ana Delhi Channel. There are no additional sensitive land uses in the project's immediate vicinity. The proposed project would include a food market and management office on the ground level. Access to the storage units on the second floor would be through a stair way accessible on the outside of the ground level. The stairway and storage units on the second story are within the building and not accessible from the outside. The 6 -foot -high block wall would enhance privacy and separate the first floor storage units that are accessible from the outside from existing residential land uses to the south. Security lighting is proposed; however, this lighting would be low intensity. In addition, the 6 -foot -high block wall along the southern boundary of the project site would further reduce the amount of light emanating off of the project site. The proposed project would result in less -than -significant lighting impacts on residential uses that are located south of the project site and south of the Santa Ana Delhi Channel. Glare Impacts Buildings with large facades constructed of reflective surfaces (e.g., brightly colored building fagades, metal surfaces, and reflective glass) could increase existing levels of daytime glare. The storage facility would not have large reflective surfaces. The proposed buildings would have stucco and wood siding. Glass doors and windows are proposed for the food hall and management office, and limited metal accents are proposed; however, these areas represent a minor percentage of the square footage of the buildings. The project includes 360 rooftop - mounted photovoltaic modules with anti -reflective coating. Given the minimal use of high -glare materials, reflective glare impacts would be less than significant. Furthermore, as required for any project within the approach/departure corridor, the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA's) final approval would be required. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 24 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.2 Agricultural and Forest Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning ❑ ❑ of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of ❑ ❑ forest land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The project area is developed, and the project site is currently developed for commercial uses. The project vicinity is void of any agricultural uses and The California Department of Conservation Important Farmland Map for Orange County identified the project site as urban and built-up land (CDC, 2012). Therefore, no impact to Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance would occur. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 25 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. As stated previously, the project area is void of agricultural uses. The project site does not include land enrolled in Williamson Act Contracts (California Department of Conservation, 2013) and therefore, would not conflict with a Williamson Act Contract. C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The project would not conflict with existing zoning of forest land or cause rezoning of forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned for Timberland Production. The proposed project involves a zone change from Planned Development Commercial to General Commercial, which does not involve any changes to current General Plan land use or zoning designations for forest land, or timberland. Additionally, there are no timberland zoned production areas within the project site. No impact would occur. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact. The project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use because the project area is outside of forest lands. No impact would occur. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact. Refer to responses 2(a) through 2(d). The project site is developed with existing commercial buildings and a parking lot. No other changes to the existing environment would occur from implementation of the proposed project that could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use or forest land to non -forest use. Thus, no impact would occur. References California Department of Conservation (CDC). 2012. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, Orange County Important Farmland. CDC. 2012. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. Accessed December, 2015. ftp: //ftp. consrv. ca. gov/pub/dlrp/wa/2012%20 Statewide%2OMap/WA_2012_ l l x 17.pdf CDC. 2004. Orange County Agricultural Preserves. Accessed December, 2015. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/Orange WA_ 03_04.pdf Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 26 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.3 Air Quality Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 3. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the El E] ® El applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute El ® 0 El substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 1:1 E] any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant El El ® El concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial El El ® El number of people? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). As such, SCAQMD's 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is the applicable air quality plan for the proposed project. Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are considered to be consistent with the AQMP growth projections, since the forecast assumptions by SCAG forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP. Additionally, because SCAG's regional growth forecasts are based upon, among other things, land uses designated in General Plans, a project that is consistent with the land use designated in a General Plan would also be consistent with the SCAG's regional forecast projections, and thus also with the AQMP growth projections. Because the project site is an existing use and is considered within the City's General Plan and the development of the proposed project is a permitted use under the General Plan, the development of the proposed project would be consistent with SCAG's regional forecast projections. Therefore, the project would also be consistent with the growth projections accounted for in SCAQMD's AQMP. As a result, the proposed project would not conflict with, or obstruct, implementation of the AQMP, and this impact would be less than significant. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 27 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Construction Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Construction emissions are considered short term and temporary, but have the potential to represent a significant impact with respect to air quality. Particulate matter (i.e., PM10 and PM2.5) is among the pollutants of greatest localized concern with respect to construction activities. Compliance with Rule 403, SCAQMD's fugitive dust control regulation, was accounted for in the construction emissions modeling. Emissions of ozone precursors, reactive organic gases (ROGs), and nitrogen oxides (NOx) are primarily generated from mobile sources and vary as a function of vehicle trips per day associated with debris hauling, delivery of construction materials, vendor trips, and worker commute trips, and the types and number of heavy-duty, off-road equipment used and the intensity and frequency of their operation. A large portion of construction -related ROG emissions also result from the application of architectural coatings and vary depending on the amount of coatings applied each day. Construction emissions were modeled using CalEEMod. Emissions are summarized in Table 4.3-1. Assumptions and modeling output are included in Appendix A. As shown in Table 4.3-1, most maximum daily construction emissions generated by the proposed project's worst-case construction scenario would not exceed SCAQMD's daily significance threshold for criteria pollutants during any of the construction phases. However, emissions of ROG from architectural coatings (anticipated to be applied during the final portions of construction in 2019) were predicted by CalEEMod to exceed SCAQMD significance thresholds. TABLE 4.3-1 PROPOSED REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Construction Activities ROG Estimated Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs./day) NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.1 2017 2.84 28.66 22.44 0.03 8.01 4.81 2018 3.15 21.97 19.00 .0.03 1.76 1.35 2019 243.63 20.08 18.33 0.03 1.59 1.19 Total Emissions 249.62 70.71 59.77 0.10 11.36 7.35 2019 mitigated ROG 49.96 - - - - - Total mitigated Emissions 55.95 70.71 59.77 0.10 11.36 7.35 Regional Significance 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant Impact? No No No No No No ROG = reactive organic gas; NOx = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; S02= sulfur dioxide; PM10= particulate matter less than 10 microns; PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns; lbs./day = pounds per day NOTE: Construction emissions would be slightly different during the summer and winter seasons. Maximum daily emissions of ROG and NOx would generally be higher during the winter while emissions of CO and SO2 would generally be higher in the summer. The maximum emissions for each pollutant over the course of the summer and winter seasons are shown in this table. SOURCE: ESA, 2016 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 28 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Mitigation Measure AIR -1: The applicant shall utilize architectural coatings for both interior and exterior finishing with low or no VOC to avoid potential significant impacts to air quality. These architectural coatings shall be rated with emissions less than or equal to 50 gallons per liter. Significance After Mitigation Applying mitigation measure AIR -1 would require the use of architectural coatings with low or no volatile organic compounds (VOC). As shown in Table 4.3-1, ROG emissions would reduce to less than the SCAQMD threshold for ROG emissions. Therefore, AIR -1 would reduce this potential impact to a less -than -significant impact. Construction emissions with mitigation would have a less -than -significant impact related to regional air quality. Operation Implementation of the proposed project would result in long-term regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors associated with area sources, such as natural gas consumption, landscaping, applications of architectural coatings, and consumer products, in addition to operational mobile emissions. The annual operational criteria pollutant emissions associated with the existing uses at the project site, which would be displaced by the project, are subtracted from the project's estimated annual criteria pollutant emissions to properly assess the net increase in emissions that would occur from project implementation. Operational emissions were modeled using CalEEMod. Emissions are summarized in Table 4.3-2 below. Assumptions and modeling output are included in Appendix A. TABLE 4.3-2 PROPOSED PROJECT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Estimated Emissions (lbs./day) Emissions Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.1 Proposed Project Area Sources 2.75 1 E-4 0.011 0.00 4E-5 4E-5 Energy Sources 0.04 0.32 0.27 1.94E-4 0.025 0.025 Mobile Sources 2.34 5.27 21.79 0.06 3.71 1.04 Total Project Emissions 5.13 5.59 22.07 0.06 3.74 1.61 Existing Uses Area Sources 0.99 4E-5 4E-3 0.00 1 E-5 1 E-5 Energy Sources 2.3E-3 0.021 0.018 1.3E-4 1.59E-3 1.59E-3 Mobile Sources 3.88 6.88 30.80 0.052 3.65 1.03 Total Existing Uses Emissions 4.87 6.90 30.82 0.052 3.65 1.03 Total Net Operational Emissions 0.26 -1.31 -8.75 0.01 0.09 0.13 Regional Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 100 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No NOTE: Operational emissions would be slightly different during the summer and winter seasons. Maximum daily emissions of ROG and NOx would generally be higher during the winter while emissions of CO and SO2 would generally be higher in the summer. The maximum emissions for each pollutant over the course of the summer and winter seasons are shown in this table. SOURCE: ESA, 2016 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 29 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 As shown in Table 4.3-2, the proposed project would result in long-term regional emissions of criteria air pollutants and ozone precursors that are below SCAQMD's applicable thresholds. The project's operational emissions would not result in or substantially contribute to emissions concentrations that exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). Therefore, operational emissions would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, and impacts would be less than significant. C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The project site is located within the SCAB, which is considered the cumulative study area for air quality. Because the SCAB is currently classified as a state nonattainment area for ozone, PMIo, and PM2.5, cumulative development consisting of the proposed project along with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable fixture projects in the SCAB as a whole could violate an air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. However, based on SCAQMD's cumulative air quality impact methodology, SCAQMD recommends that if an individual project results in air emissions of criteria pollutants (ROG, CO, NOx, SOx, PMIo, and PM2.5) that exceed the SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds for project -specific impacts, then it would also result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of these criteria pollutants for which the proposed project region is in non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. As shown in Table 4.3-1, the project's construction emissions would exceed the SCAQMD's daily threshold for ROG. In addition, the operational emissions associated with the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD's thresholds of significance for any of the long-term operational criteria pollutants (see Table 4.3-2). Furthermore, the proposed project would also be consistent with SCAQMD's AQMP. Thus, operation of the proposed project would not conflict with SCAQMD's air quality planning efforts for nonattainment pollutants and would not lead to a cumulatively considerable net increase in nonattainment pollutants during operational activities. Overall, the net increase of proposed project's construction emissions would exceed the SCAQMD's daily threshold for ROG, and therefore, would contribute considerably to cumulative emissions of ROG. These construction emissions of ROG would be a significant cumulative impact. Operational emissions associated with project operations would be less than the SCAQMD's daily thresholds for the criteria pollutants, and thus the project's contribution to long- term cumulative air quality impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable. Therefore, the project would result in a less -than -significant cumulative impact during operational activities. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 30 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Mitigation Measure Implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR -1 is required. Significance after Mitigation Applying mitigation measure AIR -1 would reduce ROG emissions to less than the SCAQMD threshold for ROG emissions. Therefore, AIR -1 would reduce the project's contribution to cumulative ROG emissions to less than cumulatively considerable. Therefore, the project would result in a less -than -significant cumulative impact during construction activities. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than Significant Impact. CO Hotspots Based on the traffic study for the project (LLG, 2015), the existing site trip generation for traffic is estimated to be 1,228 trips per day. Operation of the proposed project is estimated to generate 886 trips per day. Thus, implementation of the proposed project would result in a decrease of 342 trips per day. As such, it is unlikely that the proposed project would significantly impact any local intersection and no CO Hotspot analysis would be required. This impact is considered less than significant. Construction Localize Significance Threshold The daily on-site construction emissions generated by the proposed project were evaluated against SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds (LSTs) for a 2 -acre site to determine whether the emissions would cause or contribute to adverse localized air quality impacts. 1 The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are the single- and multi -family residential buildings located west and south of the project site. The nearest residential buildings to the south and west are located approximately 50 meters from the project site's boundary. Construction emissions were modeled using CalEEMod, and the predicted emissions were used to compare SCAQMD LST thresholds. Emissions are summarized in Table 4.3-3. Assumptions and modeling output are included in Appendix A. As shown in Table 4.3-3, the daily unmitigated emissions generated on-site by the proposed project's worst-case construction scenario would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LST for NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 for a 2 -acre site in SRA 20. Therefore, localized air quality impacts from project construction would be less than significant. 1 According to SCAQMD's LST methodology, LSTs are only applicable to the on-site construction emissions that are generated by a project and do not apply to emissions generated off-site such as mobile emissions on roadways from worker, vendor, and haul truck trips. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 31 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 TABLE 4.3-3 PROPOSED PROJECT UNMITIGATED LOCALIZED DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Construction Phase Estimated Maximum Daily On -Site Emissions (lbs./day) NOx CO PM,ca PM2.5a 2017 28.66 22.44 8.01 4.81 2018 21.97 19.00 1.76 1.35 2019 20.08 18.33 1.59 1.19 Highest Daily Construction Emissions 28.66 22.44 8.01 4.81 Localized Significance Threshold" 128 1,089 21 7 Significant Impact? No No No No a Emissions account for implementation of dust control measures as required by SCAQMD Rule 403 -Fugitive Dust. LSTs for a 2 -acre site in SRA 20 at a receptor distance of 50 meters. No No SOURCE: ESA, 2016 Operational LST During project operations, the daily amount of localized pollutant emissions generated on-site by the proposed project would not be substantial, particularly when considering that the current daily on-site operational emissions associated with the existing uses would be displaced by those of the proposed project. The proposed project's net increase in on-site operational emissions is shown in Table 4.3-4. Operational emissions were modeled using CaIEEMod, and the on-site emissions were used to compare SCAQMD LST thresholds. Emissions are summarized in Table 4.3-4 below. Assumptions and modeling output are included in Appendix A. As shown, the project's total net operational -related emissions generated on-site would not exceed SCAQMD's applicable operational LSTs. Thus, localized air quality impacts during project operations would be less than significant. TABLE 4.3-4 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCALIZED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Estimated Emissions (lbs./day) Emissions Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Proposed Project 5.59 22.07 3.74 1.61 Existing Uses 6.90 30.82 3.65 1.03 Total Net Operational Emissions -1.31 -8.75 0.09 0.13 Localized Significance Threshold 128 1,089 6 2 Significant Impact? No No No No SOURCE: ESA, 2016 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 32 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Construction Toxic Air Contaminants Project construction would result in short-term emissions of diesel PM, a Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC). Diesel PM poses a carcinogenic health risk that is measured using an exposure period of 70 years. The exhaust of off-road heavy-duty diesel equipment would emit diesel PM during demolition, site preparation (e.g., clearing); site grading and excavation; paving; installation of utilities, materials transport and handling; building construction; and other miscellaneous activities. SCAQMD has not adopted a methodology for analyzing such impacts and has not recommended that health risk assessments be completed for construction -related emissions of TACs. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), carcinogenic health risk assessments, which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to TAC emissions, should be based on a 70 -year exposure period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period or duration of activities associated with the proposed Project. The construction period for the proposed project would be much less than the 70 -year period used for risk determination. Because off-road heavy-duty diesel equipment would be used only for short time periods, project construction would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial emissions of TACs. This impact would be less than significant. Operational TACs Typical sources of acutely and chronically hazardous TACs include industrial manufacturing processes, automotive repair facilities, and dry cleaning facilities. The project would not include any of these potential sources, although minimal emissions may result from the use of consumer products. This impact would be less than significant. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant Impact. Land uses that are associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. As a commercial development, the proposed project would not include any of these uses that have been identified as being associated with odors. Thus, the proposed project is not expected to result in objectionable odors for the neighboring uses. During construction of the proposed project, exhaust from equipment and activities associated with the application of architectural coatings and other interior and exterior finishes may produce discernible odors typical of most construction sites. Such odors would be a temporary source of nuisance to adjacent uses, but would not affect a substantial number of people. As odors associated with project construction would be temporary and intermittent in nature, the odors would not be considered to be a significant environmental impact. Therefore, impacts associated with objectionable odors would be less than significant. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 33 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 References Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG). Trip Generation Assessment for the Bristol Autoplex Site Proposed Bristol Food Market and Bristol Storage Project. July 21, 2015. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 34 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.4 Biological Resources Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or El D through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian El El D habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally El E] E protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any 1:1 ® El native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances El E] El protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 1:1 E] Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The project site is located within an entirely developed area with various commercial and automotive repair businesses, in the City of Costa Mesa. The project site is developed with scattered landscaped vegetation and maintained grass. Land uses surrounding the project site consists of commercial and residential development to the north, south and west, and a golf course to the east. No natural or native vegetation communities occur on or immediately adjacent to the project site, nor do any undeveloped or open space areas or areas capable of supporting native habitats or plant communities exist on the project site. The soils on the entire project site are compacted, except in areas containing landscaping, and much of the site is covered with concrete and asphalt. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 35 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Based on a review of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) databases for the Newport Beach, California topographic quadrangle and surrounding seven quadrangles (Appendix B), a total of 98 special -status plant and wildlife species have been recorded in the region. However, due to the existing development on the project site and surrounding properties, there is no potential for any special -status plant or animal species to occur on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on special -status species. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The project site is located within an urban setting that is entirely developed and contains no native vegetation. No natural drainage, man-made drainage features, or other waterways such as creeks or rivers capable of supporting riparian vegetation occur on the project site. A flood control channel is located to the immediate southwest of the project site that conveys flows to the Newport Back Bay. This flood control channel is concrete -lined and does not contain riparian vegetation. No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community occurs on, or adjacent to, the project site. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. The project site is located on relatively flat land that has been graded and developed. All natural areas and native vegetation have been removed from the project site, which have been replaced with concrete and asphalt with scattered landscaped vegetation. No natural waterways or drainages, or mapped blue -line streams are located on the project site. A concrete -lined flood control channel is located to the southwest of the project site but is separated from the project site by an adjacent levee. There are no wetland indicators on or adjacent to the project site that meet the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) criteria for determining the presence of wetlands or hydraulic features that may be within their jurisdiction, including vegetation, hydric soils or a hydrologic nexus to a Traditional Navigable Water (TNW). As such, there are no features on the project site that would be regulated in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and subject USACE jurisdiction. Additionally, no wetland waters of the State regulated by Section 404 of the CWA and Section 1600 of California Fish and Game Code occurs on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on any federal or state protected wetlands. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 36 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The project site contains scattered landscaped ornamental trees that could provide suitable nesting habitat for common bird species known to occur in upland and urban settings such as mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), common raven (Corvus corax), and a variety of common songbirds. The ornamental trees on the site may be removed by the proposed project. If tree removal occurs during the general nesting season of February through August, there may be a potential impact to nesting birds protected in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game (CFG) Code Section 3500. Potential impacts to nesting birds would be a significant impact. Additionally, the project site does not function as a wildlife movement corridor or facilitate the movement of wildlife between open space areas that may be used for roaming, foraging or breeding. Therefore, the project will have no impact on wildlife movement corridors. Mitigation Measures BIO -1: To avoid potential significant impacts to nesting birds, the proposed project should commence outside the general nesting season. BIO -2: If the project must commence during the general nesting season, a pre - construction clearance survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to the start of the project to determine if any active nests or nestlings are present on the project site. • If no active nesting is observed the project may commence without potential impacts to nesting birds. • If active nesting is observed, a suitable buffer will be established around the nest and a biological monitor will be on-site to determine no impact occurs. No project activities may encroach into the buffer until the nest is no longer active as determined by the biological monitor. Significance after Mitigation Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO -1 and BIO -2 would reduce potential significant impacts to a less than significant level through avoidance of nesting season or avoidance of nesting disturbance. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. Section 15-138 of the CMMC preserves landmark trees within the city. Landmark trees include those that are of historical significance, rare species, aesthetically significant, or are intended to become so. The city maintains a list of landmark trees which property owners can add to. In addition, Section 15-132 of the Municipal Code protects trees on public property during Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 37 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 construction activities by requiring fencing or barriers between the tree and construction zones, and Chapter 5 of the Municipal Code requires a permit prior to installing, replacing, or altering any tree in public areas, parkways, or easements. The landscaped trees on the project site are all located on private property and do not qualify as landmark or public trees. Therefore, the project will not have an impact on any local policy or ordinance protecting trees and biological resources. 0 Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The project site is located within the Orange County Natural Community Conservation/Plan Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) and specifically within the Coastal Subarea. The NCCP/HCP focuses on protecting sensitive species and habitats within Orange County, including but not limited to the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) and coastal sage scrub habitat. Due to the existing development on the project site, there are no areas that provide suitable habitat for special -status species worth considering for inclusion into the NCCP/HCP Reserve System. The proposed project will not result in any impacts to any Covered Species or Covered Habitats and the proposed project is determined to be consistent with the biological goals and guidelines of the NCCP/HCP. Therefore, the proposed project will not have an impact on any adopted HCP or NCCP. References City of Costa Mesa. 2015. Code of Ordinances. Supplement 130 Update 2. Accessed January 6, 2016 https://www.municode.com/library/ca/costa —mesa/codes/code—of ordinances California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2016. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). RareFind 5 online database. Query of the Newport Beach, California topographic quadrangle and surrounding 7 quads. California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2016. Inventory of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of California. County of Orange. 1996. Natural Community Conservation Plan & Habitat Conservation Plan. July 17, 1996. Google Earth. 2016. Personal computer program. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 38 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.5 Cultural Resources Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? No Impact. The City of Costa Mesa General Plan Historic and Cultural Resources Element identifies historic resources within the City. Based on a review of the General Plan EIR Exhibit 4.10-1, Properties that Meet the Standards for Listing in the National Register, the project site is not identified as a historically significant resource. Further, the existing buildings on the project site were constructed in the late 1980's, and therefore are not considered eligible historic resources. The proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and no impact would occur. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. A literature search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), a historic map review, and a Sacred Lands File (SLF) check by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), were conducted to identify cultural resources within the project site. The records search indicated that 25 cultural resources studies have been conducted within a %2 -mile radius of the project site. Of these 25 previous studies, four studies include portions of the project site. The entire project site has been included in previous cultural resources surveys or monitoring reports. Furthermore, the records search indicated that a total of three prehistoric archaeological sites (CA -OR -174; CA -OR -687; CA -OR -1223) were previously recorded within a %2 -mile radius of the project site, one of which is located within the project site. CA -OR -687 was recorded during an archaeological survey approximately 500 feet northwest of the project site. In 1977, site testing was conducted to determine if sub -surface archaeological deposits exist and to determine the extent of the site. One human burial was encountered at 240 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 39 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the F1 F-1 significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? No Impact. The City of Costa Mesa General Plan Historic and Cultural Resources Element identifies historic resources within the City. Based on a review of the General Plan EIR Exhibit 4.10-1, Properties that Meet the Standards for Listing in the National Register, the project site is not identified as a historically significant resource. Further, the existing buildings on the project site were constructed in the late 1980's, and therefore are not considered eligible historic resources. The proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and no impact would occur. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. A literature search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), a historic map review, and a Sacred Lands File (SLF) check by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), were conducted to identify cultural resources within the project site. The records search indicated that 25 cultural resources studies have been conducted within a %2 -mile radius of the project site. Of these 25 previous studies, four studies include portions of the project site. The entire project site has been included in previous cultural resources surveys or monitoring reports. Furthermore, the records search indicated that a total of three prehistoric archaeological sites (CA -OR -174; CA -OR -687; CA -OR -1223) were previously recorded within a %2 -mile radius of the project site, one of which is located within the project site. CA -OR -687 was recorded during an archaeological survey approximately 500 feet northwest of the project site. In 1977, site testing was conducted to determine if sub -surface archaeological deposits exist and to determine the extent of the site. One human burial was encountered at 240 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 39 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 centimeters below ground. Maine shellfish, lithic flakes, utilized flakes, and groundstone were encountered from 100 centimeters to 260 centimeters below ground. In 1985, an archaeological study of the project site revealed archaeological artifacts, and these artifacts were recorded as part of CA -OR -687. The project site was developed after 1985 and archaeological monitoring took place during all excavation activities. The monitoring report was not available during the preparation of this IS/MND. The historic map and aerial photograph review indicates that the immediate vicinity around the project site was undeveloped until sometime between 1952 and 1963 when residential development began south of the project site. The properties to the west were developed with commercial uses in the 1970s and 1980s. The project site remained undeveloped until the mid to late 1980s when it was developed with the existing auto mall. A SLF search for the project site was performed by the California NAHC on December 24, 2015. The SLF search results indicated negative findings. Search results are included as Appendix C. The City has initiated Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) consultation with the Native American groups that who are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project, and who have requested such consultation in writing, including the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation, Juaneno Band of Mission Indians, Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, Gabrielino-Tongva Triba, Gabrieleno Tongva Nation, Soboba Band of Luiseiio Indians, and the Gabrieleiio Band of Mission Indians. The City mailed letters to the groups on December 11, 2015, inviting them to consult regarding potential impacts to tribal cultural resources. No responses have been received as of the date of this IS/MND. Based on the literature reviews and previous construction, the project site might contain prehistoric archaeological resources. The depth of disturbance during the previous construction of the project site is not known. Therefore, construction activities associated with the proposed project could encounter archaeological resources. If archaeological resources are encountered, potential significant impacts could occur. To reduce these potential impacts to cultural resources, Standard Condition SC 4.5-1 shall be implemented. Standard Condition SC 4.5-1 In the event that archaeological resources are encountered during grading and construction, all construction activities shall be temporarily halted or redirected to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of archaeological materials as determined by the City, who shall establish, in cooperation with the project Applicant and a certified archaeologist, the appropriate procedures for exploration and/or salvage of the artifacts. After the implementation of Standard Condition 4.5-1, impacts to archaeological resources could remain due to the previous discoveries of archaeological resources in the immediate project vicinity. Therefore, construction activities associated with the proposed project could result in potential significant impacts to cultural resources. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 40 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Mitigation Measures The following Mitigation Measures CUL -1 and CUL -2 are proposed if the excavations for the proposed project are deeper than previous excavations. If the proposed excavation is not deeper than previous excavations, then MMs CUL -1 and CUL -2 are not required. CUL -1: Prior to start of ground -disturbing activities, a qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for archaeology (U.S. Department of the Interior, 2008) shall conduct cultural resources sensitivity training for all construction personnel. Construction personnel shall be informed of the types of archaeological resources that may be encountered, and of the proper procedures to be enacted in the event of an inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or human remains. The City shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and retain documentation demonstrating attendance CUL -2: An archaeological monitor (working under the direct supervision of the qualified archaeologist) shall observe all initial ground -disturbing activities. The qualified archaeologist, in coordination with the City, may reduce or discontinue monitoring if it is determined that the possibility of encountering buried archaeological deposits is low based on observations of soil stratigraphy or other factors. Archaeological monitoring shall be conducted by an archaeologist familiar with the types of archaeological resources that could be encountered within the project site. The archaeological monitor shall be empowered to halt or redirect ground -disturbing activities away from the vicinity of a discovery until the qualified archaeologist has evaluated the discovery and determined appropriate treatment. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily logs detailing the types of activities and soils observed, and any discoveries. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring. The report shall be submitted to the City and any Native American groups who request a copy. A copy of the final report shall be filed at the SCCIC. Significance after Mitigation With the implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL -1 and CUL -2, project implementation would result in a less -than -significant impact involving an adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact. A paleontological records search conducted by the Los Angeles County Natural History Museum (NHM) on January 5, 2016, indicated that no vertebrate fossil localities have been identified within the project boundaries as shown on the Newport Beach USGS topographic map (Mcleod, 2015, Appendix C). The project site contains both artificial fills Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 41 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 and surficial deposits composed of younger Quaternary Alluvium, primarily derived from the drainage that flows through the area, and surface exposures of marine younger Quaternary Terrace deposits. These deposits usually do not contain significant vertebrate fossils, at least in the uppermost layers, but they may be underlain by older Quaternary deposits that could contain fossils (Mcleod, 2015). The closest paleontological resource to the project site is LACM 4219 located approximately 1.5 miles south-southwest of the project site is located near SR -55 and Santa Isabel Avenue, and produced fossil specimens of sea turtle (Cheloniidae) and camel (Camelidae) in coarse poorly sorted friable sands that were about 30 feet below grade. LACM 3267 is located about 3 miles southwest of the project site near the intersection of 19"' Street and Anaheim Avenue. LACM 9267 produced a fossil specimen of undetermined elephant, Proboscidea. LACM 1339 is located about 3 miles west of the project site along Adams Avenue near the top of the mesa bluffs east of the Santa Ana River. LACM 1339 produced fossil specimens of mammoth, Mammuthus, and camel, Camelidae, bones in sand approximately 15 feet below the top of the mesa that is overlain by shell bearing silts and sands. Paleontological resources include not only the actual fossil remains, but also the collecting localities and the geologic formations containing fossils. Fossil remains are found in the geologic deposits (sedimentary rock formations) within which they were originally buried. A paleontologically important deposit is one that has a high probability of producing unique, scientifically important fossils. This is determined by the abundance and densities of fossil specimens and/or previously recorded fossil sites exposed in the deposit. Therefore, the potential paleontological sensitivity of the project site can be assessed by identifying the paleontological importance of geologic deposits within the site. Paleontological resources represent a limited, non-renewable, and impact -sensitive scientific and educational resource. The project site is underlain by areas of artificial fill and younger Quaternary Alluvium, which are unlikely to contain vertebrate fossils. However, the younger Alluvium may be underlain by older Quaternary Alluvium deposits that are known to contain vertebrate fossils (McLeod, 2015). Thus, the Los Angeles County Natural History Museum considers the project area to have a moderate paleontological sensitivity. While shallow excavation or surface grading is unlikely to uncover paleontological resources, deeper excavations into older Quaternary Alluvium sediments may uncover fossils because significant fossils have been discovered in these deposits at such depths (McLeod, 2015). If excavation depths occur below previously disturbed areas, then excavations in the project area could result in impacts to paleontological resources. As described above, the proposed excavations and grading depths are not known. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project could result in significant impacts to paleontological resources. As a result, Standard Condition SC 4.5-2, which provides direction in the event of paleontological resources are unearthed during project has been included. Standard Condition SC 4.5-2 In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during grading and construction operations, all construction activities shall be temporarily halted or Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 42 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 redirected to permit a qualified paleontologist to assess the find for significance and, if necessary, develop a paleontological resources impact mitigation plan (PRIMP) for the review and approval by the City prior to resuming excavation activities. With the implementation of Standard Condition SC 4.5-2, potential impacts to paleontological resources would be reduced to less than significant. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. Less than Significant Impact. As described above, human remain were encountered within '/4 - mile of the project site. However, the probability that construction of the project would impact human remains is low, given the degree of past disturbance of the site, as it is developed with existing commercial land uses. Disturbance of unknown human remains during construction could be considered potentially significant. Compliance with the established regulatory framework (i.e., California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98) as required by Standard Condition SC 4.5-3, would be required. Standard Condition SC -4.5-3: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Orange County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Orange County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours. Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant may then make recommendations, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98. The implementation of Standard Condition SC -4.5-3 would reduce potential impacts involving disturbance to human remains to less than significant. References McLeod, Samuel A. 2016, Letter Report: Paleontological Resources for the Proposed Bristol Street Autoplex Project. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 43 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.6 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) No Impact. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act requires the delineation of zones along active faults in California. The purpose of the Alquist-Priolo Act is to regulate development and prohibit construction on or near active fault traces to reduce hazards associated with fault rupture. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones are the regulatory zones that include surface Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 44 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) No Impact. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act requires the delineation of zones along active faults in California. The purpose of the Alquist-Priolo Act is to regulate development and prohibit construction on or near active fault traces to reduce hazards associated with fault rupture. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones are the regulatory zones that include surface Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 44 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 traces of active faults. There are no known active faults crossing the project site, and the site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (CGS, 2015). The nearest potentially active fault is the Newport -Inglewood Fault located by the coast, approximately 4.8 miles southwest of the project site (CGS, 2015).Therefore, there would be no impact associated with rupture of a known earthquake fault. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less than Significant Impact. Costa Mesa, as with all of Southern California, is subject to strong ground shaking as the project site is located in a seismically active region. Active faults of most concern to the City's planning area are the Newport -Inglewood, Whittier, San Andreas, and San Jacinto faults. The closest fault to the project site is the Newport -Inglewood fault, which is located approximately 5 miles southwest of the project site. Earthquakes are unavoidable hazards although the resultant damage can be minimized through appropriate seismic design and engineering. The City requires that all construction meet the latest standards of the California Building Code (CBC) for construction which considers proximity to potential seismic sources and the maximum anticipated groundshaking possible. The proposed construction associated with the project would be in accordance with applicable City ordinances and policies and consistent with the most recent version of the CBC, which requires structural design that can accommodate ground accelerations expected from known active faults. In addition, the geotechnical investigation for the project site includes recommendations for final design parameters for the walls, foundations, foundation slabs, and surrounding related improvements (e.g., utilities, parking lots, and sidewalks). Compliance with these building safety design standards through adherence to Standard Condition SC -4.6-1 would reduce potential impacts associated with groundshaking, Standard Condition SC -4.6-1: The Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Electrical code, 2013 California Mechanical code, 2013 California Plumbing code,2013 California Green Building Standards Code, and the 2013 California Energy Code (or the applicable adopted California Building code, California Residential code, California Electrical code, California Mechanical code, California Plumbing Code, California Green Building Standards, California Energy Code at the time of plan submittal or permit issuance), and California Code of Regulations also known as the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the City of Costa Mesa. Areas of alteration and additions shall comply with 2013 California Green Building Standards Code section 5.303.2 and 5.303.2 Implementation of Standard Condition SC -4.6-1 would reduce potential impacts associated with the effects associated with groundshaking to less than significant. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 45 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less than Significant Impact. Liquefaction is a phenomenon where unconsolidated and/or near saturated soils lose cohesion and are converted to a fluid state as a result of severe vibratory motion. The relatively rapid loss of soil during strong earthquake shaking results in the temporary fluid-like behavior of the soil. Geologic units within the project area include thin deposits of alluvial and colluvial material overlying marine terrace deposits consisting of gravel, sand and silt. The soil is poorly to moderately consolidated and consists of peat deposits (Costa Mesa, 2015). According to the California Geological Survey, Seismic Hazard Zone Map, the project site is located in an area with the potential for liquefaction (CGS, 2015). The risk of seismically induced soil liquefaction in the project area may be high in areas due to the presence of sandy deposits associated with some of alluvial sediments as well as the shallow water table. Given this potential, if liquefiable soils are not taken into consideration in the design of proposed structure and during construction site preparation activities, liquefiable soils could have the potential to impact the structural components of the proposed project. For structures, liquefaction hazards would be reduced in accordance with the standards and guidelines outlined by the CBC. Design measures that could be used to address seismic hazards and liquefaction might include, but not be limited to, the removal and replacement of liquefiable soils, use of deep foundations, and/or soil compaction and mixing. Compliance with the CBC would be ensured through the implementation of the completed Geotechnical Report and SC 4.6-1. Standard Condition Implementation of Standard Condition 4.6-1 is required. Implementation of the features in Standard Condition 4.6-1, and those contained in the geotechnical report would use proven methods, generally accepted by registered engineers, to reduce the risk for geologic hazards, such as those from ground -failure, liquefaction, and expansive soils. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects involving seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction, and impacts would be less than significant. iv) Landslides? No Impact. The project site is not located in a landslide hazard, and the project site is relatively flat. Therefore, the project site is not susceptible to landslides as landslides are associated with weak soils and steep slopes. Historically, no deep-seated landslides are associated within the City of Costa Mesa. There would be no impacts to people or structures related to landslides. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant Impact. Soil exposed by construction activities for the proposed project could be subject to erosion if exposed to heavy rain, winds, or other storm events. Further, as project construction would disturb more than one acre of soil, the project operator would be Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 46 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction General Permit including through use of the soil erosivity waiver. In compliance with this permit, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) would be prepared and implemented, which would require erosion control, sediment control, non-stormwater and waste and material management Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the loss of topsoil or substantial erosion. Once landscape and drainage improvements are constructed, the potential for long-term erosion or loss of topsoil would be reduced to less than significant. Therefore, with implementation of these requirements and associated BMPs, erosion related to construction activities and operation of the project would be less than significant. C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less than Significant Impact. Refer to response 4.6. a) iii) above for discussions of potential impacts related to liquefaction. The proposed project is located in an area defined as having liquefaction or collapse (CGS, 2015). The proposed project would involve grading activities but would not construct deep subterranean facilities that would induce unstable geologic activity. Following compliance with the City's buildings regulations and the CBC, project implementation would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving unstable geologic units or soils. Impacts are considered to be less than significant. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less than Significant Impact. Expansive soils possess a shrink -swell characteristic that can result in structural damage over a long period of time. Expansive soils are largely comprised of silicate clays, which expand in volume when water is absorbed and shrink when dried. Highly expansive soils can cause damage to foundations and roads. Construction of the self -storage unit and food hall would comply with current building code requirements. The California Building Code requirements require the addition of measures to reduce potential impacts of expansive soils. Therefore, impacts are expected to be less than significant. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The proposed project would not involve the use or construction of septic tanks. The proposed project would connect to the existing sanitary sewer system for wastewater disposal for the City. No impact would occur. References California Department of Conservation, California Geologic Survey (CGS). 2015. Search Results for Regulatory Maps. Accessed December 2015. http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/WH/regulatorymaps.htm Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 47 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Search Results for Soils Maps. Accessed December, 2015. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 48 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less than Significant Impact. According to SCAQMD methodology, because greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are a cumulative impact, project significance is determined by the combined amortized construction and operational emissions. Construction -related GHG emissions for the proposed project were estimated using the CalEEMod with the same assumptions as the air quality analysis. The project's total estimated GHG emissions during construction would be approximately 443 MTCO2e. This would equal to approximately 14.8 MTCO2e per year after amortization over 30 years per SCAQMD methodology. Area and indirect sources associated with the proposed project would primarily result from electricity and natural gas consumption, water transport (the energy used to pump water to and from the project site), and solid waste generation. In addition, the new commercial buildings at the project site would also generate mobile source emissions from motor vehicle trips generated by workers and customers. Similar to the air quality analysis, the annual operational GHG emissions associated with the existing uses at the project site, which would be displaced by the project, are subtracted from the project's estimated annual GHG emissions to properly assess the net change in emissions that would occur from project implementation. Currently, while SCAQMD has issued proposed standards and guidelines, there is no adopted state or local standard for determining the cumulative significance of the proposed Project's GHG emissions on global climate change. However, the SCAQMD has proposed a screening level of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for residential and commercial projects (SCAQMD, 2008). It is estimated that this screening threshold would capture 90 percent of the GHG emissions from new residential or commercial projects. Since the City also has not adopted any significance criteria or Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 49 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS — Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation ❑ ❑ ® ❑ adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less than Significant Impact. According to SCAQMD methodology, because greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are a cumulative impact, project significance is determined by the combined amortized construction and operational emissions. Construction -related GHG emissions for the proposed project were estimated using the CalEEMod with the same assumptions as the air quality analysis. The project's total estimated GHG emissions during construction would be approximately 443 MTCO2e. This would equal to approximately 14.8 MTCO2e per year after amortization over 30 years per SCAQMD methodology. Area and indirect sources associated with the proposed project would primarily result from electricity and natural gas consumption, water transport (the energy used to pump water to and from the project site), and solid waste generation. In addition, the new commercial buildings at the project site would also generate mobile source emissions from motor vehicle trips generated by workers and customers. Similar to the air quality analysis, the annual operational GHG emissions associated with the existing uses at the project site, which would be displaced by the project, are subtracted from the project's estimated annual GHG emissions to properly assess the net change in emissions that would occur from project implementation. Currently, while SCAQMD has issued proposed standards and guidelines, there is no adopted state or local standard for determining the cumulative significance of the proposed Project's GHG emissions on global climate change. However, the SCAQMD has proposed a screening level of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for residential and commercial projects (SCAQMD, 2008). It is estimated that this screening threshold would capture 90 percent of the GHG emissions from new residential or commercial projects. Since the City also has not adopted any significance criteria or Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 49 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 guidelines for GHG analysis, the annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e proposed by the SCAQMD was be used as a screening level for determining the significance of the Project's GHG emissions. As shown in Table 4.7-1, the proposed project's total annual GHG emissions, as calculated using the CalEEMod, would be approximately 1,570 MTCO2e per year (detailed calculations are included in Appendix A of this report), which would not exceed SCAQMD's proposed screening level of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for commercial projects. Therefore, the net change in GHG emissions resulting from project implementation (which would be an increase in annual emissions from existing emissions of 741.11 MTCO2e per year) is considered to be less than significant. TABLE 4.7-1 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS -RELATED GHG EMISSIONS Estimated Emissions Emission Source CO2e (MT/yr) Construction Annual Mitigated Construction (Amortized over 30 14.8 years) Project Operations Area Sources 0.003 Energy Consumption a 64.60 Mobile Sources 1,419.8 Solid Waste 49.14 Water Consumption b 22.48 Total (Construction and Operational Emissions) 1,570.82 Existing Use Operations Area Sources 0.001 Energy Consumption 4.18 Mobile Sources 770.22 Solid Waste 51.98 Water consumption 3.31 Total Operational Emissions 829.71 Total Net Change in Emissions 741.11 Greater than 3,000 MTCOZe per year? No NOTES: COZe= carbon dioxide equivalent; MT/yr = metric tons per year; %=percent. a The energy-related GHG emissions, as estimated by CalEEMod, use 2008 Title 24 energy usage rates. According to the California Energy Commission, nonresidential buildings that are constructed in accordance with the 2013 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards would be 15 percent more energy efficient than the 2008 Standards. As such, this additional reduction in energy consumption was accounted for in the Project's estimated GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. b GHG emissions reductions associated with water use resulting from compliance with CALGreen requirements, which requires a minimum 20 percent reduction in indoor water use and the provision of irrigation controllers for outdoor water use, were accounted for in CalEEMod model run. SOURCE: ESA, 2016 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 50 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less than Significant Impact. The most applicable plans associated with reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases that are associated with the proposed project are the CARB Scoping Plan, the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), and the any applicable Climate Action Plans. However, the City of Costa Mesa does not have a published Climate Action Plan at this time. Therefore, the less -than -significant impact is based on the project's consistency with these plans as discussed by plan below. Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Of the Recommended Actions contained in CARB's Scoping Plan, the actions that are most applicable to the proposed project would be Actions E-1 (increased Utility Energy efficiency programs including more stringent building and appliance standards), GB -1 (Green building), and W-1 (Increased water use efficiency). CARB Scoping Plan Action E-1, together with Action GB - 1 (Green Building), aims to reduce electricity demand by increased efficiency of Utility Energy Programs and adoption of more stringent building and appliance standards, while Action W-1 aims to promote water use efficiency. The proposed project would be required to include all mandatory green building measures for new residential developments under the CALGreen Code. As such, compliance with the Green Building Practices Ordinance would result in additional reductions in energy and water consumption above current CALGreen Code requirements. Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with the Scoping Plan measures through incorporation of stricter building and appliance standards. Consistency with the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Because the proposed project is a permitted use under the General Plan, any growth resulting from the proposed project would be consistent with SCAG's regional forecast projections and, in turn, would also be consistent with the growth projections accounted for in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). As the Sustainable Communities Plan is a part of the RTP, the proposed project would not conflict with, or obstruct, implementation of the SCS, and this impact would be less than significant. References ESA, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report, February 2016 (See Appendix A) SCAQMD, Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, October 2008. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 51 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed construction activities would involve transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials such as solvents, oils, grease, and cleaning fluids. In addition, hazardous materials may be needed for fueling and servicing construction equipment on the site. During construction of the proposed project, material safety data sheets for all applicable materials present at the project site would be made readily available to on-site personnel. All transport, handling, use and disposal of substances such as petroleum products related to construction would comply with all federal, state and local laws regulating the management and Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 52 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ® ❑ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed construction activities would involve transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials such as solvents, oils, grease, and cleaning fluids. In addition, hazardous materials may be needed for fueling and servicing construction equipment on the site. During construction of the proposed project, material safety data sheets for all applicable materials present at the project site would be made readily available to on-site personnel. All transport, handling, use and disposal of substances such as petroleum products related to construction would comply with all federal, state and local laws regulating the management and Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 52 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 use of hazardous materials. BMPs would be in place to ensure the lawful and proper storage and use of these materials. The proposed project would result in the demolition of an existing 37,883 square foot multi - tenant automotive center and redevelopment of a two-story, 98,800 square foot, self -storage facility and 5,000 square foot court pad building. Operation and maintenance activities associated with a self -storage facility and food court would require limited use of hazardous materials. Such materials would involve cleaning and degreasing solvents, fertilizers, pesticides, and other materials used for the maintenance of buildings and associated landscaping. Those that would be used would be stored on-site, and in designated areas. Hazardous materials would not be stored in the self -storage units. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not result in a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials during operation of the proposed project. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. A Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for 375 Bristol Street was prepared in 2015 (EMS, 2015, included in Appendix D). The potential for subsurface contamination associated with past and current uses such as the auto maintenance and repair complex was documented. Specifically, a three -stage clarifier on the project site is used to control discharges from floor drains in the tenant suites. It is possible that solvents have been used to clean auto parts. There is also a concern for potential subsurface contamination from use of petroleum products. The Phase 11 consisted of analyzing 11 soil gas samples for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), and tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and trichloroethylene (TCE). The results of the laboratory analysis of the samples determined that TCE was not detected in any of the soil gas samples. PCE was detected at concentrations below the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) / Human Ecological Risk Office (HERO) Note 3 adjusted commercial/industrial screening level of 4,200 micrograms per cubic meter. The Phase II also included analysis of 14 soil samples for VOCs. TPHg was detected at concentrations below the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region Residential Screening Levels (RSL) for TPHg. PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations below the DTSC/HERO Note 3 screening level for PCE and EPA Region 9 RSLs for TCE. During soil sampling of the borings near the clarifier, groundwater was encountered at depths of approximately 10 and 12 feet. According to the Phase I performed for the site, groundwater in the area is at approximately 35 feet below ground surface. Therefore, groundwater was not anticipated at 10 feet. Based on the close proximity of the borings to the clarifier, it is a possibility that the clarifier is leaking and the perched groundwater and wet soil encountered are a result of a leak. While there is a possibility of a leak, no soil or soil gas was detected that exceeded the DTSC/HERO Note 3 or EPA Region 9 RSLs for VOCs or TPHg. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 53 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Based on the soil gas and soil testing results, it is recommended that the clarifier be removed during site demolition and preparation. The potential for the release of hazardous materials during earthmoving activities is considered low based on the findings. However, there is a potential for affected soils in the area, and could be a potentially significant effect on workers during construction activities at the site. As discussed above in discussion 4.8 (c), operation and maintenance activities associated with a self -storage facility and food court would require limited use of hazardous materials. Such materials would involve cleaning and degreasing solvents, fertilizers, pesticides, and other materials used for the maintenance of buildings and associated landscaping. Those that would be used would be stored on-site, and in designated areas. Hazardous materials would not be stored in the self -storage units. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not result in a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Impacts associated with operation of the project would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: A Soil Management Plan (SMP) should be developed for the site and used during demolition and grading to ensure proper handling and disposal of unknown affected soils encountered during excavation and grading. The SMP should specify the process for identifying, segregating, profiling and disposing of any stained soil or soil with strong odors. The SMP should also identify the specific process for removal and cleanup of the clarifier. Significance after Mitigation Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would reduce potential impacts to construction workers and the public from exposure to unknown affected soils. Therefore, compliance with Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would ensure that the project construction would not create a significant hazard to workers or the public through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. There are no schools within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school. The closest school is Duggan Dental Studies, which is located approximately 0.35 mile southeast from the project area. The Montesstori Academy is located 0.60 mile southwest of the project site, and Costa Mesa High School is located 1.50 miles northwest of the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of a school. No impact would occur. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 54 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less than Significant Impact. A review of the Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and Substances List — Site Cleanup (Cortese List) indicates that identified hazardous material sites are not located within the project site (DTSC, 2007). In addition, a review of the DTSC EnviroStor and the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker online databases did not indicate any open cleanup sites or hazardous waste facilities within the vicinity of the project area (DTSC, 2012). Therefore, since the project is not located on a list associated with hazardous materials, impacts are expected to be less than significant. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Less than Significant Impact. The Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) is the comprehensive land use plan adopted and administered by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County, as required by Section 21675 of the California Public Utilities Code. The AELUP establishes land use guidelines based on noise and safety impacts for areas surrounding airports. The most current AELUP for John Wayne Airport (JWA) was approved in April 2008. The proposed project is located less than a quarter -mile southwest of JWA, and thus is within the Airport Planning Area of JWA according to the ALUC. Land uses within the planning area boundaries of the AELUP must conform to the following safety and height restriction standards. Height Restriction Zone. Buildings within this area of the AELUP cannot exceed 30 feet in height. The proposed project buildings would not exceed 30 feet. Airspace/Airport Inconsistency. In reviewing projects, the Commission will find any structure, either within or outside of the planning areas, inconsistent with this AELUP if it: 1. Is determined to be a "Hazard" by the FAA; 2. Would raise the ceiling or visibility minimums at an airport for an existing or planned instrument procedure (i.e., a procedure consistent with the FAA approved airport layout plan or a proposed procedure formally on file with the FAA); 3. Would result in a loss in airport utility, e.g. in a diminution of the established operational efficiency and capacity of the airport, such as by causing the usable length of the runway (s) to be reduced; or 4. Would conflict with the VFR air space used for the airport traffic pattern or enroute navigation to and from the airport. Since the project is located within the vicinity of John Wayne Airport's Airport Planning Area, it is subject to the safety restrictions listed above. The building height of the self -storage facility and Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 5555 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 food service establishment would not "interfere with the established, or planned, airport flight procedures, patterns, or navigational systems" since it meets the development standards specified in the Costa Mesa General Plan. In addition, the project would not threaten, endanger, or interfere with aeronautical operations due to the project's exterior lighting, where it would be clearly visible during hours of twilight or darkness. Therefore, the project would result in a less than significant safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The project area is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The closest private airstrip is the Costa Mesa Police Department, which is approximately 1.45 miles southwest of the project site. Therefore, no impact would occur. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less than Significant Impact. The Costa Mesa Disaster Plan serves as the community's Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), which provides guidance during emergency situations. The EOP analyzes potential large scale disasters that require a coordinated and immediate response. The City's emergency evacuation routes are shown in the City General Plan Safety Element, Exhibit SAF -9: Emergency Evacuation Routes. Evacuation operations would be conducted by law enforcement agencies, highway/road/street departments, and public and private transportation providers. The project site is located along a designated emergency evacuation route along Bristol Street. The proposed project would be constructed completely within the proposed project property and construction equipment would access the project site via Bristol Street which is the main access point to the site. There will be no road closures or alterations to Bristol Street during construction and all construction equipment would be stored in active grading areas and/or the proposed staging areas within the project area. Once constructed, the proposed project does not include any uses or design features that would result in interference with any adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The design of the proposed project would provide adequate emergency access consistent with City requirements, including the required number and design of access points and safety features. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to emergency access during construction and/or operation. The proposed project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan and, thus, this impact would be less than significant. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wild land fires, including where wild lands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wild lands? No Impact. The project site is not located in an area classified as a "Wildland Area That May Contain Substantial Forest Fire Risks and Hazards" or a "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 56 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Therefore, the risk for wildland fire is low and project implementation would not expose people or structures to a significant risk involving wild land fires. References California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2015. DTSC's Hazardous Waste and Substances Site list — Site Cleanup (Cortese List). Accessed December, 2015. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm. DTSC. EnviroStor Database. Accessed December 2015. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ California State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. Accessed December, 2015. http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/default. asp?CMD=runreport& myaddress=375+Bristol+St.+Costa+Mesa%2C+Ca Environmental Management Strategies, Inc., Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, November 2015. Environmental Management Strategies, Inc., Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, December 2015. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 57 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of a site or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or by other means, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of a site or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or by other means, substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant Impact. Impacts related to water could occur during construction, when the potential for erosion, siltation, and sedimentation is highest, and after construction during project operation, when impacts related to sedimentation would decrease, but urban runoff would increase. Although the project site is relatively flat, construction activities such as vegetation Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 558 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 clearing and grading have the potential to result in top soil loss and soil erosion by exposing bare soil to wind and rain. Materials that could potentially contaminate the construction area from a spill or leak include diesel fuel, gasoline, lubrication oil, hydraulic fluid, antifreeze, transmission fluid, lubricating grease, concrete, and other fluids. Potential stormwater pollutants during operation that are specific to this project site include: suspended solids/sediment, nutrients, and pesticides as landscaping would exist on-site; pathogens (bacteria/virus) as bacterial indicators are routinely detected in pavement runoff; and heavy metals, oil and grease, toxic organic compounds, and trash and debris, which is expected in commercial development (Psomas, 2015). Impervious surfaces do not allow rain and runoff to infiltrate into the ground; therefore any reduction of impervious surfaces would benefit potential impacts to water quality. The process of infiltration reduces the amount of stormwater that is capable of becoming urban runoff and also filters water removing potential water quality pollutants. According to the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) prepared by Psomas (2015; Appendix E), the project is located in potential areas of erosions, habitat and physical structure susceptibility. The project site consists of three parcels totaling 3.2 acres. The site is located in an area of low infiltration which classifies the soil as being soil group D (infiltration rate approximately 0.20 in/hour). Infiltration on site is not feasible because of the low infiltration rate of the underlying soil. The existing site is lower than the adjacent Bristol Street to the north. Runoff currently drains directly into grate inlets in the drive aisles, parking lots and interior courtyards. The existing storm drain flows from the north to south into the existing Orange County owned Santa Ana -Delhi Channel south of the project. This concrete channel then flows easterly and southerly through the Newport Beach golf course property which then connects into Upper Newport Bay. The proposed drainage pattern is similar to the existing condition, with the exception that the site runoff would be directed into biofiltration BMPs before discharging into the storm drain system. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the EPA has established regulations under the NPDES program to control direct stormwater discharges from construction activities disturbing one acre or more of land. The NPDES program regulates industrial pollutant discharges, which include construction activities. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) works in coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) to preserve, protect, enhance, and restore water quality. The City is within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana RWQCB (SARWQCB). Short -Term Construction The proposed project construction would be completed in one phase and would have short-term impacts. The project would disturb more than one acre of soil and therefore is required to obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ and prepare an SWPPP. One element required under an SWPPP is to list Best Management Practices (BMPs) that the project operators will use to protect stormwater runoff and the placement of those BMPs. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 59 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 In addition, the CMMC Title 8, Chapter III, Section 8-32, requires that all significant redevelopment within the city be undertaken in accordance with the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). A significant redevelopment project is described as one that adds or replaces 5,000 or more square feet of impervious surface. Accordance with the DAMP also includes project guidance and conditions and requirements established by the development services and public services departments. These conditions and requirements are related to the reduction and elimination of pollutants in stormwater runoff from project. These departments must approve plans prior to the City's issuance of Grading or Building Permits. As the project's demolition and construction activities would be subject to compliance with NPDES requirements, which include obtaining coverage under the General Construction Permit by filing the Permit Registration Documents like the SWPPP as well as the provisions of the CMMC. Compliance with the NPDES and CMMC requirements would ensure that the project's construction -related impacts to water quality would be less than significant. Operation The Municipal Storm Water Permitting Program regulates stormwater discharges from municipal separate storm sewer (drain) systems (MS4s). The MS4 permits require the development and implementation of a Storm Water Management Plan/Program with the goal of reducing the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) which is the performance standard specified in Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act. The management programs specify what BMPs would be used to address certain program areas that include public education and outreach; illicit discharge detection and elimination; construction and post -construction; and good housekeeping for municipal operations. The Orange County Flood Control District, the County of Orange, and the City of Costa Mesa, along with 51 other incorporated cities therein (Permittees) discharge pollutants from their MS4s. Stormwater and non-stormwater enter and are conveyed through the MS4s and are discharged to surface water bodies of the Orange Region. These discharges are regulated under countywide waste discharge requirements contained in Order No. R8-2009-0030 (as amended by Order No. R8-2010- 0062), Waste Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, and the Incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region Area wide Urban Storm Water Runoff Orange County, which was approved on May 19, 2011. Order No. R8-2009-0030, which serves as an NPDES permit, has expired but remains in effect until the Orange Water Board adopts a new permit. The County Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was developed as part of the municipal stormwater program to address stormwater pollution from new development and redevelopment by the private sector. This WQMP contains a list of the minimum required BMPs that must be employed for a designated project. The Model WQMP describes the process for preparing Conceptual or Preliminary WQMPs and final Project WQMPs for certain new development and significant redevelopment projects called "Priority Projects." The proposed project is a priority project, and therefore, must prepare a WQMP that specifies the proposed BMPs. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 60 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 The Preliminary WQMP mentioned above describes proposed project landscaping that would include drought -tolerant shrubs and trees in perimeter landscaping. Since infiltration is not feasible on this project, stormwater BMPs for the project would include filtration planters and bioretention with underdrains. The proposed project drainage would be collected using roof downspouts, and flow directly into the top of filtration planter boxes. These planter boxes and bioretention BMPs would consist of a layer of mulch, sandy loam and gravel. Once the stormwater passes through the planting material, the water will outlet from the base of the planter by curb drain to the street gutter. The proposed drainage pattern is similar to the existing condition, with the exception of runoff into biofiltration BMPs before discharging into the storm drain system. The existing 18 -inch on-site storm drain would be relocated away from the proposed structures and placed within a proposed sidewalk and on-site traffic circulation system. The 18 -inch on-site storm drain system would collect stormwater from the eastern half of the project site. Existing 6 -inch, 12 -inch, and 18 -inch on-site storm drain would remain it their current locations and continue to collect stormwater from the western half of the project site. The 18 -inch on-site storm drain in the eastern portion of the project site would convey stormwater to the existing Santa Ana -Delhi channel near the southeastern corner of the project site. The 18 -inch on-site storm drain in the southwestern portion of the project site would convey stormwater to the Santa Ana -Delhi channel in the southern portion of the project site. Overall, the existing site has more impervious surfaces than the proposed condition, therefore, the proposed runoff and peak flows would be lower for proposed condition than in the existing condition. Compliance with NPDES, DAMP, CMMC, and the SWPPP's and WQMP's BMPs, would reduce potential project development impacts on water quality, hydraulic conditions, and stormwater pollutants. Impacts related to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during construction and operation would be less than significant. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? Less than Significant Impact. Mesa Consolidated Water District (Mesa Water) supplies water to the project site. According to Mesa Water's UWMP (mentioned in 4.17b), Mesa Water's main sources of water supply are groundwater pumped from wells within the Lower Santa Ana River Groundwater Basin (Orange County Basin) and imported water from Metropolitan Water District of Southern California through Municipal Water District of Orange County. Mesa relies on approximately 15,900 acre-feet of groundwater from the Orange County Basin each year. This local source of supply meets approximately 82 percent of Mesa's total annual demand. The project would include the demolition of an existing 37,883 sf multi -tenant automotive center, and the redevelopment of a two-story 100,000 sq. ft., self -storage unit facility with a freestanding 5,000 sf multi -tenant food court building. The project would include a 1,200 sf ground -floor management office. Though the water demand will increase with project implementation, there Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 61 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 would be no net deficit in aquifer volume or lowering of groundwater table near the project site as the proposed project would result in an increase of permeable surface area. Project implementation would result in less -than -significant impacts to groundwater supplies and ground water recharge. C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not alter the existing drainage pattern of a site or area through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or by other means, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. No streams or rivers exist within the proposed project area as the project site is located within an already urbanized environment. The Santa Ana -Delhi concrete -lined channel is located just south of the project site. The proposed project would not involve activities that could potentially impact local drainage patterns such as substantial grading, topographic alteration, or impacts to drainages or storm drain facilities. Adherence to all NPDES MS4 Permit regulations, including applicable BMPs, would ensure construction and operation does not result in erosion or flooding impacts. The proposed project would include implementation of landscape features, including bio -retention areas and other BMPs would also be incorporated into landscape design. These BMPs would reduce the peak discharge of runoff from the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not alter the existing drainage pattern of the project site or area and substantial erosion of siltation would not occur. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on - or off-site? Less than Significant Impact. As stated above in response 4.9 (c), the proposed project would not substantially alter the local drainage pattern. The proposed project would use minimal water during construction and operation and would thereby not generate a large amount of runoff as a result of site activities. No stream or river traverses the project site. The Santa Ana -Delhi Flood Control Channel is located just south of the project site but project implementation would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-site, off-site, or in the channel. BMPs discussed above would control drainage on- site, thereby reducing its potential to cause flooding from occurring on or off-site. Therefore, flooding impacts resulting from drainage pattern alteration would be less than significant. e) Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less than Significant Impact. The project would be served by the City's stormwater drainage system. Temporary construction activities such as demolition and grading could introduce Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 62 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 additional pollutants and sediment into water runoff and flow into nearby storm drains. Stormwater runoff generated on the project site during operation could result in flooding on- or off-site. During storm events, some runoff could wash into the adjacent Santa Ana -Delhi Channel located south of the project site. However, as discussed, the project would implement BMPs during construction and operation that are designed to help maintain perviousness on-site. Therefore, the proposed project would not generate runoff that exceeds the existing stormwater drainage system or creates additional polluted sources of runoff. Impacts regarding exceedance of storm drain systems and creation of polluted runoff would be less than significant. f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less than Significant Impact. Refer to response 4.9(a). g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The proposed project consists of commercial redevelopment. No housing would be developed as part of the proposed project. The Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the project site (FIRM No. 06059CO267J) shows that the project site is located within a Zone A, flood hazard zone (FEMA, 2012). Because no housing is proposed, there would be no impacts regarding placement of housing within a flood zone. h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant Impact. As stated above in response 9 (g), the FEMA FIRM for the project site shows that the project site is located within a flood hazard zone. The existing site is at a lower elevation than the adjacent Bristol Street to the north. Stormwater runoff currently drains directly into grate inlets in the drive aisles, parking lots and interior courtyards. The existing storm drain flows from the north to south into the Delhi Flood Control Channel south of the project. This concrete channel then flows easterly and southerly through the Newport Beach golf course property which then connects into Upper Newport Bay. The proposed project's first finished floor would be elevated above the base flood elevation indicated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map effective height. Therefore, there would be less -than -significant impacts related to flooding and flood flows. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less than Significant Impact. The project site is not located in a City -designated dam inundation flood zone (Costa Mesa, 2000). Therefore, impacts related to flooding including failure of a levee or dam would be less than significant. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 63 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Less than Significant Impact. A seiche is the sloshing of a closed body of water from earthquake shaking (USGS, 2016). Seiches are of concern relative to water storage facilities because inundation from a seiche can occur if the wave overflows a containment wall, such as the wall of a reservoir, water storage tank, dam, or other artificial body of water. There is no enclosed body of water in the project area. The absence of any large bodies of water within Costa Mesa and the location of high bluffs adjacent to Newport Bay preclude the possibility of damage from seiche effects (Costa Mesa, 2000). Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving inundation by seiche. Impacts would be less than significant. A tsunami is a sea wave of local or distant origin that results from large-scale seafloor displacements associated with earthquakes, major submarine slides or exploding volcanic islands (USGS, 2012). An event such as an earthquake creates a large displacement of water resulting in a rise or mounding at the ocean surface that moves away from this center as a sea wave. Tsunamis generally affect coastal communities and low-lying (low -elevation) river valleys in the vicinity of the coast. Buildings closest to the ocean and near sea level are most at jeopardy. The project site is located approximately 4.50 miles north of the Pacific Ocean and outside of the Tsunami Hazard Zone identified by the California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA, 2009). Therefore, impacts related to tsunamis would not occur. A mudflow is an earthflow consisting of material that is wet enough to flow rapidly and typically occurs in small, steep stream channels (USGS, 2004). The project area is flat and does not contain any small, steep stream channels. Thus, no mudflow impacts would occur. References California Emergency Management Agency (CAL EMA). 2009. Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning, Newport Beach Quadrangle. Accessed at http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/geologic—hazards/Tsunami/Inundation_Maps/Orange/ Documents/Tsunami—Inundation NewportBeach—Quad Orange.pdf on Decemberl6, 2015. Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA). Flood Insurance Rate Map. Accessed at http://mapl.msc.fema.gov/idms/IntraView.cgi?ROT=O&O_X=7200&O Y=5175&0 ZM= 0.077294&0 SX=1113&0 SY=799&O_DPI=400&0 TH=90223620&0EN=90263746 &O PG=1&O MP=1&CT=O&DI=O&WD=14400&HT=10350&JX=1672&JY=917&MP T=0&MPS=O&ACT=1&KEY=90223305&ITEM=1&PICK VIEW CENTER.x=731&PIC K VIEW CENTER.y=549&R1=VIN on December 16, 2015. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2012, Earthquake Glossary — seiche, Accessed at www.earthquake.usgs.gov/leam/glossary/?term=seiche on February 2, 2016. USGS, 2012, Earthquake Glossary — tsunami, Accessed at www.earthquake.usgs.gov/leam/glossary/?term=tsunami on February 2, 2016. USGS, 2004, Landslide Types and Processes, Fact Sheet, Accessed at www.pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2004/3072/fs-2004-3072.html on February 2, 2016. City of Costa Mesa, General Plan, Safety Element, 2000. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 64 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.10 Land Use and Land Use Planning Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 10. LAND USE AND LAND USE PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ® ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ❑ ❑ or natural community conservation plan? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The project does not propose any action that could divide an established community. The physical division of an established community generally refers to the construction of a feature such as an interstate highway or railroad tracks, or removal of a means of access, such as a local road or bridge that would impact mobility within an existing community or between a community and outlying area. The project site is located in the eastern portion of Costa Mesa and is surrounded by commercial uses to the east, Newport Beach Golf Course to the west, SR -73 and John Wayne Airport to the north, and residential uses to the south. The proposed project would demolish and remove an existing 37,883 sf automotive center and construct a self -storage facility and a supporting ground floor management office, and a freestanding multi -tenant food court building within the same site boundaries as the automotive center. Since the project would construct the facility on an established commercial facility, the project would result in no impact to the physical division of an established community. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less than Significant with Mitigation. The proposed project would be consistent with following applicable goals and objectives outlined in the City's General Plan. However, the proposed project is subject to the development standards outlined in the City's Zoning Code and the applicable standards outlined in the JWA's AELUP. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would result in a less -than -significant impact to a conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation with jurisdiction over the project. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 65 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan The Land Use Element of the General Plan depicts long-range development in the City of Costa Mesa by setting forth the location and extent of allowable development and by indicating the land use goals, policies, and objectives to guide new development. According to the City of Costa Mesa General Plan Land Use Map, the land use designation of the project is General Commercial. The General Commercial designation is intended to permit a wide range of commercial uses, which serve both local and regional needs. These areas should have exposure and access to major transportation routes since significant traffic can be generated. General Commercial areas should be insulated from the most sensitive land uses, either through buffers of less sensitive uses or on-site mitigation techniques. Project consistency with the General Plan's specific goals and objectives is evaluated below. The goals and objectives listed below are evaluated due to their relevance to the proposed project. Goal LU -1: Land Use. It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a balanced community of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and institutional uses to satisfy the needs of the social and economic segments of the population and to retain the residential character of the City; to meet the competing demands for alternative developments within each land use classification within reasonable land use intensity limits; and, to ensure the long-term viability and productivity of the community's natural and man-made environments. Consistencv: The redevelopment project would provide a self -storage facility under the title and design features of a "mini -warehouse" with a freestanding food court building that is designated for general commercial uses. The project would add to the commercial character of the community and meet the competing demands for alternative development. Therefore, the Project is consistent with this General Plan goal. Objective LU -IB. Ensure the long-term productivity and viability of the community's economic base. Consistencv: The project would develop a profitable self -storage facility and food court building and would provide local employment opportunities. The proposed project would strengthen the City's economic base. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan objective. Goal LU 2: Development. It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to establish development policies that will create and maintain an aesthetically pleasing and functional environment and minimize impacts on existing physical and social resources. Consistencv: The project would redevelop the property with a self -storage and a food court building. The project would enhance the site's visual appearance through the use of landscaping to soften the visual impact of the storage facility. The proposed project would include the use of materials and colors that create visual interest as outlined in City policies related to aesthetics. The project's design would reflect that of similar project Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 66 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 recently constructed in the area. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan goal. Obiective LU 2A: Encourage new development and redevelopment to improve and maintain the quality of the environment. Consistency: The proposed project includes the redevelopment of a site that currently has an automotive mall. Implementation of the proposed project would reduce stormwater runoff by improving on-site hydrology. The building would be designed with energy saving components including solar panels and low-energy lighting. City of Costa Mesa Municipal Code: Title 13 — Planning, Zoning, and Development According to the Costa Mesa Zoning Map, the project site is zoned Planned Development Community (PDC). The Costa Mesa Zoning Code states that a PDC zoning allows for the use of retail shops, offices and service establishments, including but not limited to, hotels, restaurants, theaters, museums, financial institutions, and health clubs. These uses are intended to serve adjacent residential areas, as well as the entire community and region. Complementary residential and industrial uses of a similar or supportive nature to the uses noted may also be allowed if compatible with the PDC zoning. The PDC zoning designation is compatible with the General Commercial Land Use designation. The project proposes a rezone from PDC to General Business District (C2), which is defined as a district intended to provide for those uses which offer a wide range of goods and services which are generally less compatible with more sensitive land uses of a residential or institutional nature. The proposed project's self -storage facility would be defined under the title of mini -warehouse. According to the City Municipal Code: Title 13, Chapter IX, Special Land Use Regulations, Article 7, mini -warehouses have the following use restrictions: (1) No facility shall be used for: a. Any business activity (other than rental of storage units) including miscellaneous or garage sales, and transfer/storage businesses which utilize vehicles as part of the business; or b. Servicing or repair of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers, or any similar equipment. (2) All rental contracts shall include clauses prohibiting: a. The storage of flammable liquids, highly combustible or explosive materials, or hazardous chemicals; and b. The use of the property for uses other than storage. (3) A resident manager shall be required on the site and shall be responsible for maintaining the operation of the facility in conformance with the conditions of approval and all applicable ordinances. This requirement may be waived by the final review authority, if alternative security measures are found acceptable. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 67 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 TABLE 4.10-1 CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL COMMERCIAL STANDARDS Development Standard (Required/Allowed) Project Consistent? Minimum Lot Area: 12,000 SF 138,487 SF (total lot area) Yes Floor Area Ratio: • Very Low Traffic FAR: 0.75 0.75 Yes Density: 20 DU per acre (residential units) None N/A Building Height: 2 stories/30 feet 2 stories/30 feet Yes Setbacks: • Front: 20 feet . 25 feet Yes • Side (left/right): 15 feet 31-35 feet Yes • Rear: 0 feet . 20-24 feet Yes Parking: Yes • Office: 4 spaces per 1000 SF 1200 SF x 4 = 5 spaces • Restaurant: 10 spaces per 1000 SF (for the first 3000 SF) 3000 SF x 10 = 30 spaces • Restaurant: 12 spaces per 1000 SF (for each additional 1000 SF above the first 3000 SF) 2000 SF x 12 = 24 spaces • Storage: 1 space per 200 units 744 units/200 = 4 spaces Total Required = 63 spaces Total = 63 spaces (according to Wiley Architects site plan, July 2015) Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport The Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) is the comprehensive land use plan adopted and administered by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County, as required by Section 21675 of the California Public Utilities Code. The AELUP establishes land use guidelines based on noise and safety impacts for areas surrounding airports. The most current AELUP for John Wayne Airport (JWA) was approved in April 2008. The land use compatibility plan within the AELUP is intended to provide for JWA's 20 -year planning future. The purpose of the plan is to "protect the public from the adverse effects of aircraft noise, to ensure that people and facilities are not concentrated in areas susceptible to aircraft accidents, and to ensure that no structures or activities adversely affect navigable air space" (JWA DEIR 2014). The proposed project is located less than a quarter -mile southwest of JWA, and thus is within the Airport Planning Area of JWA according to the ALUC. Land uses within the planning area Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 68 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 boundaries of the AELUP must conform to the following noise, safety and height restriction standards. Noise Impact Zone 1— High Noise Impact Commercial, industrial, and recreational uses may be acceptable in the High Noise Impact Zone providing that commercial and industrial structures are sufficiently sound attenuated to allow normal work activities to be conducted. Said structures shall be sound attenuated against the combined input of all present and projected exterior noise to meet the following criteria: Typical Use Level L (eq)*(12)** General office, reception, clerical etc. 50 dB(A) Restaurant, bank lobby, retail store, , etc. 55 dB(A) Warehousing, manufacturing, kitchen, , etc. 65 dB(A) * L(eq) is the equivalent sound level for a specified time period in dB(A). ** Measured from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. or other appropriate, approved time period. Source: AELUP for JWA, 2008 In addition, it is recommended that all designated outdoor common or recreational areas within Noise Impact Zone 1 provide outdoor signage informing the public of the presence of operating aircraft. As described below in response 4.12, the proposed project's interior noise at the proposed food hall would exceed the 55 decibels (dBA) standard which could result in a potentially significant impact. The proposed project's interior noise at the proposed office within the self -storage facility would exceed the 50 dBA standard which could result in a potentially significant impact. Height Restriction Zone Any object, which by reason of its height or location would interfere with the established, or planned, airport flight procedures, patterns, or navigational systems, is unacceptable to the Commission. Similarly, any proposal which would cause a diminution in the utility of an airport is unacceptable to the Commission. The standards, criteria, and procedures promulgated by the FAA for the thorough evaluation of development projects are designed to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace. The application of these principles by the Commission will ensure the stability of local air transportation, as well as promote land uses that are compatible with the AELUP. However, any object which rises above the height of surrounding development, or which is located in close proximity to any of the various flight paths, must be clearly visible during hours of Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 69 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 twilight or darkness and must not threaten, endanger, or interfere with aeronautical operations. Such objects, even if within the above height restrictions, are not acceptable to the Commission unless they are clearly marked or lighted according to FAA standards. The proposed building would not exceed 30 feet and would remain compatible with the AELUP height restrictions. Therefore, no impact would occur. In reviewing projects, the Commission will find any structure, either within or outside of the planning areas, inconsistent with this AELUP if it: 1. Is determined to be a "Hazard" by the FAA; 2. Would raise the ceiling or visibility minimums at an airport for an existing or planned instrument procedure (i.e., a procedure consistent with the FAA approved airport layout plan or a proposed procedure formally on file with the FAA); 3. Would result in a loss in airport utility, e.g. in a diminution of the established operational efficiency and capacity of the airport, such as by causing the usable length of the runway (s) to be reduced; or 4. Would conflict with the VFR air space used for the airport traffic pattern or enroute navigation to and from the airport. The project includes 360 rooftop -mounted photovoltaic modules with anti -reflective coating. The photovoltaic modules are not anticipated to create a new source of substantial reflective glare. Furthermore, as required for any project within the approach/departure corridor, the FAA's final approval would be required to ensure no glare or interference with aviation operations would occur. Mitigation Measures Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 and NOI-2 is required Significance after Mitigation Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 and NOI-2 would ensure that the interior noise levels within the proposed food hall and the office within the self -storage facility would meet the AELUP interior noise standards of 55 dBA and 50 dBA, respectively. Potential interior noise impacts would be reduced to less than significant. C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. The project site is located within the Orange County Natural Community Conservation/Plan Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) and specifically within the Coastal Subarea. The NCCP/HCP focuses on protecting sensitive species and habitats within Orange County, including but not limited to the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) and coastal sage scrub habitat. Due to the existing development on the project site, there are no areas that provide suitable habitat for special -status species worth considering for Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 70 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 inclusion into the NCCP/HCP Reserve System. The proposed project will not result in any impacts to any Covered Species or Covered Habitats and the proposed project is determined to be consistent with the biological goals and guidelines of the NCCP/HCP. Therefore, the proposed project will not have an impact on any adopted HCP or NCCP. References Airport Land Use Commission, Orange County. Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. Amended April 17, 2008. City of Costa Mesa. City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan. Chapter 2: Land Use Element. Adopted January 2002. City of Costa Mesa. Commercial Development Standards. Handout. Last Printed June 20, 2012. County of Orange. Natural Community Conservation Plan & Habitat Conservation Plan. July 17, 1996. Data Basin. California Coastal Zone Map. <http://databasin.org/maps/new#datasets=ed49d8389c2349f2aOc9e56cfc7c48ef>. Accessed January 22, 2016. John Wayne Airport. Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 617 - John Wayne Airport Settlement Agreement Amendment. SCH No. 2001111135. Published May 2014. Order of the City Council. Costa Mesa Municipal Code. Title 13: Planning, Zoning and Development. Adopted January 7, 1974. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 71 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.11 Mineral Resources mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. According to United States Geological Survey's (USGS) Mineral Resources Data System, the project site is not identified as a known mineral resource area and does not have a history of mineral extraction uses. In addition, according to the State of California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, no oil well exists on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource and no impacts would occur. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. The Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan does not identify the project site as a mineral resource zone. In addition, the project site is developed with light industrial uses and does not support mineral extraction operations. This condition precludes the possibility of related impacts. No impacts would occur. References United States Geological Survey, Mineral Resources Data System, 2015. http://mrdata.usgs.gov/mineral-resources/mrds-us.html. California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources Well Finder, 2015. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/index.html#close. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 72 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 11. MINERAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. According to United States Geological Survey's (USGS) Mineral Resources Data System, the project site is not identified as a known mineral resource area and does not have a history of mineral extraction uses. In addition, according to the State of California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, no oil well exists on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource and no impacts would occur. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. The Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan does not identify the project site as a mineral resource zone. In addition, the project site is developed with light industrial uses and does not support mineral extraction operations. This condition precludes the possibility of related impacts. No impacts would occur. References United States Geological Survey, Mineral Resources Data System, 2015. http://mrdata.usgs.gov/mineral-resources/mrds-us.html. California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources Well Finder, 2015. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/index.html#close. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 72 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.12 Noise c) Result in A substantial permanent increase in ambient ❑ Less Than ® ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing Significant without the project? Potentially with Less Than d) Result in A substantial temporary or periodic increase Significant Mitigation Significant ❑ Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 12. NOISE —Would the project: a) Result in Exposure of persons to, or generation of, ® ❑ noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Result in Exposure of persons to, or generation of, ❑ ® ❑ excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) Result in A substantial permanent increase in ambient ❑ ❑ ® ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) Result in A substantial temporary or periodic increase ❑ ® ❑ in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ® ❑ area, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, in an area within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project located in the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Background Noise is generally defined as unwanted sound. Sound, traveling in the form of waves from a source, exerts a sound pressure level (referred to as sound level) that is measured in dB, which is the standard unit of sound amplitude measurement. The dB scale is a logarithmic scale that describes the physical intensity of the pressure vibrations that make up any sound, with 0 dB corresponding roughly to the threshold of human hearing and 120 to 140 dB corresponding to the threshold of pain. Pressure waves traveling through air exert a force registered by the human ear as sound. Sound pressure fluctuations can be measured in units of hertz (Hz), which correspond to the frequency of a particular sound. Typically, sound does not consist of a single frequency, but rather a broad band of frequencies varying in levels of magnitude. When all the audible frequencies of a sound are measured, a sound spectrum is plotted consisting of a range of frequency spanning 20 to 20,000 Hz. The sound pressure level, therefore, constitutes the additive force exerted by a sound corresponding to the sound frequency/sound power level spectrum. The typical human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies of the audible sound spectrum. As a consequence, when assessing potential noise impacts, sound is measured using an electronic filter that deemphasizes the frequencies below 1,000 Hz and above 5,000 Hz in a manner corresponding to the human ear's decreased sensitivity to extremely low and extremely high frequencies. This method of frequency weighting is referred to as A -weighting and is expressed Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 73 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 in units of A -weighted decibels (dBA). A -weighting follows an international standard methodology of frequency de -emphasis and is typically applied to community noise measurements. An individual's noise exposure is a measure of noise over a period of time. While a noise level is a measure of noise at a given instant in time, community noise varies continuously over a period of time with respect to the contributing sound sources of the community noise environment. Community noise is primarily the product of many distant noise sources, which constitute a relatively stable background noise exposure, with the individual contributors unidentifiable. The background noise level changes throughout a typical day, but does so gradually, corresponding with the addition and subtraction of distant noise sources such as traffic. What makes community noise variable throughout a day, besides the slowly changing background noise, is the addition of short -duration, single -event noise sources (e.g., aircraft flyovers, motor vehicles, sirens), which are readily identifiable to the individual. These successive additions of sound to the community noise environment change the community noise level from instant to instant, requiring the measurement of noise exposure over a period of time to legitimately characterize a community noise environment and evaluate cumulative noise impacts. This time -varying characteristic of environmental noise is described using statistical noise descriptors. The most frequently used noise descriptors are summarized below: Leq: The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is Leq is the energy -mean dBA during a measured time interval. It is the "equivalent" constant sound level that would have to be produced by a given source to equal the acoustic energy contained in the fluctuating sound level measured. LmaX: The maximum, instantaneous noise level experienced during a given period of time. Lrnin: The minimum, instantaneous noise level experienced during a given period of time. Ldn: Also termed the DNL, the Ldn is defined as the A -weighted average sound level for a 24- hour day with a 10 -dB penalty added to nighttime sound levels (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) to compensate for increased sensitivity to noise during usually quieter evening and nighttime hours. CNEL: CNEL, or Community Noise Equivalent Level, is defined as the A -weighted average sound level for a 24-hour day. It is calculated by adding a 5 -dB penalty to sound levels in the evening (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and a 10 -dB penalty to sound levels at night (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) to compensate for increased sensitivity during such time periods when a quiet environment is expected. An important way of predicting a human reaction to a new noise environment is the way it compares to the existing environment to which one has adapted (i.e., comparison to the ambient noise environment). In general, the more a new noise level exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise level will be judged by those hearing it. With regard to increases in A -weighted noise level, the following relationships generally occur: Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 74 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 • Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1 dBA cannot be perceived. • Outside of the laboratory, a 3 dBA change in noise levels is considered to be a barely perceivable difference. • A change in noise levels of 5 dBA is considered to be a readily perceivable difference. • A change in noise levels of 10 dBA is subjectively heard as doubling of the perceived loudness. These relationships occur in part because of the logarithmic nature of sound and the decibel system. The human ear perceives sound in a non-linear fashion, hence the decibel scale was developed. Because the decibel scale is based on logarithms, two noise sources do not combine in a simple additive fashion, but rather logarithmically. For example, if two identical noise sources produce noise levels of 50 dBA, the combined sound level would be 53 dBA, not 100 dBA. Noise levels from a particular source generally decline as distance to the receptor increases. Other factors, such as the weather and reflecting or barriers, also help intensify or reduce the noise level at any given location. A commonly used rule of thumb for roadway noise is that for every doubling of distance from the source, the noise level is reduced by about 3 dBA at acoustically "hard" locations (i.e., the area between the noise source and the receptor is nearly complete asphalt, concrete, hard -packed soil, or other solid materials) and 4.5 dBA at acoustically "soft" locations (i.e., the area between the source and receptor is normal earth or has vegetation, including grass). Noise from stationary or point sources is reduced by about 6 to 7.5 dBA for every doubling of distance at acoustically hard and soft locations, respectively. Noise levels may also be reduced by intervening structures — generally, a single row of buildings between the receptor and the noise source reduces the noise level by about 5 dBA, while a solid wall or berm reduces noise levels by 5 to 10 dBA. Regulatory Framework County of Orange Noise Ordinance Because the single-family residential to the south of the project site is in the unincorporated areas of the County, the County noise ordinance is applied for the noise impacts due to the project operation and construction. The County's code of ordinance states that in order to control unnecessary, excessive and annoying sounds emanating from unincorporated areas of the County, it is hereby declared to be the policy of the County to prohibit such sounds generated from all sources as specified in this code of ordinance. Table 4.12-1 presents the residential noise standards. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 75 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 TABLE 4.12-1 RESIDENTIAL NOISE STANDARDS Time of Day Exterior Interior 7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m. 55 dBA 55 dBA 10:00 p.m. -7:00 a.m. 50 dBA 45 dBA SOURCE: County of Orange, Division 6, Noise Control. In addition to the residential noise standard, Section 4-6-7 exempts noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property, provided said activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. Note that this ordinance will be applied to the determination of the significant impact to the single-family residential to the south of the project site by project construction and operation. City of Costa Mesa General Plan The General Plan provides criteria to assess the compatibility of proposed project development. The Noise Element, Tables N-3 and N-4 specify land use compatibility and exterior/interior noise standards. Because the proposed project is to develop a self -storage unit facility with a freestanding multi -tenant food court pad building, the proposed project is considered as commercial. Noise Element Table N-4 states that the interior noise standard for office building is 50 dBA CNEL and business commercial is 55 dBA CNEL. Table 4.12-2 presents land use compatibility for the proposed project land use. TABLE 4.12-2 NOISE AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY MATRIX Community Noise Exposure in CNEL dBA Normally Conditionally Normally Clearly Land Use Category Acceptable' Acceptable Unacceptable` Unacceptable Office Building, Business Commercial 50-67.5 67.5-77.5 77.5-85 NA and Professional a Normally Acceptable: Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction, without any special noise insulation requirements. b Conditionally Acceptable: New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. c Normally Unacceptable: New Construction or development should be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. d Clearly Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. NA: Not Applicable SOURCE: City of Costa Mesa, General Plan Noise Element Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 76 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Environmental Evaluation a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise in level in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards or other agencies? Less -than -Significant Impact with Mitigation. Potential project noise impacts were assessed for 1) project construction to the adjacent noise sensitive receivers, 2) off-site noise impact due to the project operation, and 3) on-site noise impact to the project development. It is concluded the impact would be less than significant with the implementation of specified mitigation measurements. See details in below. Construction With regard to construction noise, Section 4-6-7 exempts noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property, provided said activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. It is assumed that construction would not occur outside of indicated hours and considered less than significant. Off -Site Noise Impacts The potential noise impacts to the off-site noise sensitive receivers due to the development of the project would be vehicular activity in the parking lot and potential rooftop HVAC (Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning) units. It should be noted that the Trip Generation Assessment report dated on July 21, 2015 indicated that the traffic volume at the project site would decrease when compared to the existing condition. Therefore it is determined that the noise level due to the vehicular activity in the parking lot would not increase with the project. With regard to HVAC noise, the project design, which includes the number of HVAC units and its locations, is not available at this early stage of the project. Therefore, a typical commercial rooftop unit was used. According to Carrier's Duct Free Systems Product Data Digest, large commercial size HVAC unit would produce the noise level of 65.3 dBA at 1 meter. It equates the HVAC unit noise level at the closest noise sensitive receiver (100 feet from the project site) would be less than 40 dBA based on the noise attenuation rate of 6 dBA per doubling the distance. Therefore, the impact of noise levels from rooftop HVAC units would be less than significant. On -Site Noise Impacts Noise impact to the project is based on the land use compatibility described in the City's General Plan, which is presented in Table 4.12-2. There are two dominant noise sources to the project site: vehicular traffic noise from State Road (SR) 73 and air traffic noise from SNA. The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA's) Traffic Noise Model (TNM) was used to predict SR 73 vehicular traffic noise level at the project structure facades. In order to predict noise levels from existing traffic condition, the following data was used: Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 77 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 • Traffic Volume: 2014 traffic volumes were derived from Caltrans' Traffic Census Program. The 2014 peak hour traffic volume on SR73 between Jamboree Road and Route 55 Junction was 12,800. • Vehicular Mix: 2014 truck traffic data was derived from Caltrans' Traffic Census Program. It was determined approximately 2% of medium trucks and 0.5% of heavy trucks. Based on the above information, the predicted noise level at 50 feet from the center of SR73 would be approximately 83 dBA. The distances to the Food Hall and the office of the storage building would be 280 feet and 350 feet from the center of SR73, respectively. Based on the noise attenuation rate of 3 dBA per doubling the distance, the noise level at Food Hall would be 76 dBA and at the office of the storage building would be 75 dBA. With regard to air traffic noise at the project site, SNA's Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report from July 2015 to September 2015 was reviewed. Noise Monitoring Site (NMS) IS is located approximately 1,000 feet to the south of the project site. However, the distance between the project site and the extended runway centerline is relatively similar to the distance between NMS 1 S and the extended runway centerline, it is determined that NMS 1 S noise data would represent the air traffic noise at the project site. The air traffic noise at the project site would be 67.3 dBA. The project site exterior noise would be the combination of noise levels from vehicular traffic and air traffic. At the food hall, the exterior noise level would be 77 dBA (76 + 67.3 = 77 dBA). At the office of the storage building, the exterior noise level would be 76 dBA (75 + 67.3 = 76 dBA). Based on Table 4.12-2, the noise level up to 77.5 dBA would be conditionally acceptable as it is noted that new construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Therefore, impacts related to interior noise would be potentially significant. Mitigation Measures N0I-1: Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall show evidence, and the Development Services Director shall approve, an alternative form of ventilation, such as air conditioning systems or noise -attenuated passive ventilation, shall be included in the building design to ensure that windows can remain closed for prolonged periods of time in order to meet the commercial (food hall) interior noise standard of 55 dBA CNEL established by the City. In addition, prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall show evidence, and the Development Services Director shall approve, that all project wall assemblies (windows, doors, and wall combinations) have been designed and will be constructed to meet the interior noise standard of 55 dBA CNEL. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 78 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 N0I-2: Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall show evidence, and the Development Services Director shall approve, an alternative form of ventilation, such as air conditioning systems or noise -attenuated passive ventilation, shall be included in the building design of the proposed office within the self -storage facility to ensure that windows can remain closed for prolonged periods of time in order to meet the office interior noise standard of 50 dBA CNEL established by the City. In addition, prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall show evidence, and the Development Services Director shall approve, that all project wall assemblies (windows, doors, and wall combinations) have been designed and will be constructed to meet the interior noise standard of 50 dBA CNEL. Significance after Mitigation Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI- land NOI-2 would reduce the potential noise impact to less than significant. In order to meet the interior noise standard for office building of 50 dBA and for commercial (food hall) of 55 dBA, at least 26 dBA of exterior to interior noise reduction would be required for the proposed office within the self -storage facility, and at least 27 dBA of exterior noise reduction would be required for the proposed food hall. Mitigation measures to incorporate such design would be required in order to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 for the proposed food hall interior noise level and Mitigation Measure NOI-2 for the proposed office use within the self - storage facility would reduce noise impacts to less than significant. b) Exposure of people to generation or excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less -than -Significant Impact. Ground -borne vibration would be generated from the operation of heavy construction equipment at the project site, which could potentially affect the existing sensitive land uses surrounding the site. Once completed the proposed project, there would be no operational sources causing ground -borne vibration. The closest off-site structure to the project site is the commercial building to the northwest and residential structures to the south. Distances to the commercial building and residential structures are approximately 30 feet and 100 feet, respectively. Ground -borne vibration levels resulting from construction activities at the project site were estimated using data published by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in its Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2006) document. The FTA has adopted vibration standards that are used to evaluate potential building damage impacts related to construction activities, which are shown in Table 4.12-3. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 79 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 TABLE 4.12-3 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION DAMAGE CRITERIA Building Category PPV (in/sec) I. Reinforced -concrete, steel or timber (no plaster) 0.5 II. Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.3 III. Non -engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.2 IV. Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 SOURCE: FTA, 2006. In addition, the FTA has also adopted standards associated with human annoyance for ground - borne vibration impacts for the following three land -use categories: Vibration Category 1 — High Sensitivity, Vibration Category 2 — Residential, and Vibration Category 3 — Institutional. The FTA defines Category 1 as buildings where vibration would interfere with operations within the building, including vibration -sensitive research and manufacturing facilities, hospitals with vibration -sensitive equipment, and university research operations. Vibration -sensitive equipment includes, but is not limited to, electron microscopes, high-resolution lithographic equipment, and normal optical microscopes. Category 2 refers to all residential land uses and any buildings where people sleep, such as hotels and hospitals. Category 3 refers to institutional land uses such as schools, churches, other institutions, and quiet offices that do not have vibration -sensitive equipment, but still have the potential for activity interference. The vibration thresholds associated with human annoyance for these three land -use categories are shown in Table 4.12-4. TABLE 4.12-4 GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION IMPACT CRITERIA FOR GENERAL ASSESSMENT Frequent Occasional Infrequent Land Use Category Events' Eventsb Events' Category 1: Buildings where vibration would 65 VdB' 65 VdB' 65 VdB' interfere with interior operations. Category 2: Residences and buildings where 72 VdB 75 VdB 80 VdB people normally sleep. Category 3: Institutional land uses with 75 VdB 78 VdB 83 VdB primarily daytime use. a "Frequent Events" is defined as more than 70 vibration events of the same source per day. b "Occasional Events" is defined as between 30 and 70 vibration events of the same source per day. c 'Infrequent Events" is defined as fewer than 30 vibration events of the same kind per day. d This criterion is based on levels that are acceptable for most moderately sensitive equipment such as optical microscopes. SOURCE: FTA, 2006. The various peak particle velocity (PPV) expressed in inches per second (in/sec) and root mean square (RMS) velocity expressed in VdB levels for the general construction equipment that would operate during the construction of the proposed project are identified in Table 5. Based on the information presented in Table 4.12-5, vibration velocities could reach as high as Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 80 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 approximately 0.2 10 PPV at 25 feet from the source activity, depending on the type of construction equipment in use. This corresponds to a RMS velocity level of 94 VdB at 25 feet from the source activity. Note that it is assumed that impact activities, such as pile driving, would not be used for this project. TABLE 4.12-5 VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Approximate PPV Approximate RMS Equipment (in/sec) at 25 feet (VdB) at 25 feet Vibratory Roller' 0.210 94 Large Bulldozer 0.089 87 Loaded Trucks 0.076 86 Jackhammer 0.035 79 Small Bulldozer 0.003 58 a Vibratory roller will be used only for Pond Lining/Miscellaneous phase. SOURCE: FTA, 2006. Structure Damage Construction activities associated with the proposed project would have the potential to impact the surrounding off-site structures. The commercial building to the northwest is considered as engineered concrete structure, with no habitable rooms other than business use. Therefore, the vibration impact threshold would be 0.3 in/sec PPV. In order to exceed 0.3 in/sec PPV, a vibratory roller needs to be within 20 feet of the structure. Because the adjacent building is more than 30 feet apart from the project site, the vibration impact from project construction would be less than significant. The closest residential structure to the south is approximately 100 feet from the project site and considered as non -engineered timber structure. The vibration impact threshold would be 0.2 in/sec PPV. The PPV value of a vibratory roller at 100 feet would be 0.026 in/sec PPV. Therefore, the vibration impact from project construction would be less than significant. Human Annoyance The construction vibration could annoy people within a building. Note that the businesses to the northwest of the project site would not be considered for human annoyance because it is assumed that people would not sleep in a building. The vibration impact threshold for human annoyance at a residential structure would be 80 VdB. The RMS value of a vibratory roller at 100 feet would be 76 VdB. Therefore, the vibration human annoyance impact from project construction would be less than significant. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 81 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less than Significant Impact. As described above in Section 12.a, operation of the project would not increase existing noise levels as a result of vehicular traffic activity in the parking lot and HVAC units. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the proposed project would involve the use of a wide variety of heavy construction equipment on-site, and would generally involve the following construction phases: Demolition, Ground Clearing, Excavation, Foundation, Erection, and Finishing. Project construction would occur during the hours specified in the CCMC, which his between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 am through 6:00 pm Saturday. Construction activity is prohibited on Sunday and the following specified holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. Construction activities occurring under each of these phases would require the use of heavy equipment (e.g., excavators, backhoes, loaders, graders, bore/drill rigs, compactors, cranes, etc.) along with the use of smaller power tools, generators, and other sources of noise. During each construction phase there would be a different mix of equipment operating and noise levels would vary based on the amount of equipment in operation and the location of each activity. As such, construction activity noise levels at the site would fluctuate depending on the particular type, number, and duration of use of the various pieces of construction equipment. Because it is in the early stage of the project, the details of construction equipment and usage information are not available. Table 4.12-6 presents the approximate noise levels by construction phases. TABLE 4.12-6 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS AT 50 FEET Estimated Noise Levels Construction Phase (dBA) Clearing and Demolition 84 Excavation 89 Foundation 78 Erection 85 Finishing 89 SOURCE: EPA 1971 The closest noise sensitive receiver is located to the south of the project site, approximately 170 feet from the center of the construction site. It is estimated that the construction noise level at the Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 82 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 closest noise sensitive receiver would be 78 dBA during excavation based on the noise attenuation rate of 6 dBA per doubling the distance. As it is described in Section 12.a, traffic noise level from SR73 would be 83 dBA at 50 feet. The distance between the center of SR73 and the closest residential property line is approximately 500 feet. Based on the noise attenuation rate of 3 dBA per doubling the distance, the traffic noise level at the closest residential property would be 73 dBA. It is also described in Section 12.a, air traffic noise level in the vicinity of the project site would be 67.3 dBA. Therefore, the ambient noise level at the closest residential use would be as high as 74 dBA (73 dBA + 67.3 dBA). Combining construction noise level and ambient noise level at the closest residential property would be 79 dBA, which is an increase of 5 dBA over ambient noise level. A 5-dBA increase is clearly perceptible. However, with regard to construction noise, Section 4-6-7 of the County noise ordinance exempts noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property, provided said activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. Therefore, the construction noise from the project site would be less than significant. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Less than Significant with Mitigation. The project site is located approximately 500 feet south of SNA property line and is exposed to aircraft noise levels between 65 and 70 dBA CNEL. Under the SNA's Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUC) standards, commercial/industrial uses are considered "conditionally consistent" with aircraft noise levels less than 70 dBA CNEL. It states that the project must use sound attenuation as required by the California Noise Insulation Standards, Title 25, California Code of Regulations. Commercial and industrial structures shall be sound attenuated to meet Noise Impact Zone 1 criteria, which is 50 dBA in a general office space and 55 dBA for the proposed food hall. Implementation of the proposed project could result in an exceedance of both of these noise level standards, and therefore would result in a significant noise impact. Mitigation Measure Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 and NOI-2 is required. Significance after Mitigation Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-land NOI-2 would reduce the potential noise impact to less than significant. In order to meet the interior noise standard for office building of 50 dBA and for commercial (food hall) of 55 dBA, at least 26 dBA of exterior to interior noise reduction would be required for the proposed office within the self -storage facility, and at least 27 dBA of exterior noise reduction would be required for the proposed food hall. Mitigation measures to incorporate such design would be required in order to reduce potential impacts to a Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 83 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 less than significant level. Implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 for the proposed food hall interior noise level and Mitigation Measure NOI-2 for the proposed office use within the self - storage facility would reduce noise impacts to less than significant. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. No impacts would occur. References Caltrans, Traffic Census Program, 2014 Traffic Volumes and 2014 Truck Traffic data. http://traffic-counts.dot.ca.gov/ Accessed on January 26, 2016. Carrier Corporation. 2001. Duct Free Systems Product Data Digest. City of Costa Mesa. 2002. City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan. Adopted January 2002. County of Orange. 1973. Orange County Code of Ordinance, Noise Control. County of Orange. 2008. Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport, April 17. County of Orange. 2015. Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report for the period of July 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015. Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006. Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers. 2015. Trip Generation Assessment for the Bristol Autoplex Site Proposed Bristol Food Market and Bristol Storage Project, July 21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Noise from Construction Equipment and Building Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances, December 1971. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 84 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.13 Population and Housing Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ❑ directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing ❑ ❑ units, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ❑ ❑ ❑ the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No Impact. A project could induce population growth in an area directly or indirectly. For example, direct population growth can occur by introducing new business or residential areas and indirect growth by extending roads or other infrastructure. The proposed project involves the development of a two-story self -storage facility with a management office, and a freestanding food court building. The proposed project would result in temporary employment during construction and permanent employment during operation. The on-site workforce for construction is expected to be negligible for a short duration. The construction workers would likely come from the existing labor pool in the general vicinity. The long-term employment would not impact population growth to a significant impact level as the self -storage facility and food court does not pose the addition of a substantial amount of new employment. Although the proposed project would produce additional short-term and permanent employment, it is intended to meet the existing commercial demand that is already projected based on the existing land use. As such, the redevelopment of the proposed self -storage facility and food court would be considered growth - accommodating, rather than growth -inducing. The proposed project would not result in any substantial change to the existing land use pattern or trigger substantial growth in the area. Therefore, no impacts are expected, and no mitigation measures are required. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The existing project site currently contains an automotive center titled The Autoplex facility, and the site includes associated parking. The proposed project would demolish the Autoplex and redevelop the project site with a self -storage facility and food court building. There are no existing residences on the project site and no residences would be condemned or displaced Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 85 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 by this project. Therefore, the proposed project would not displace people or housing, and there would be no impact. C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. As discussed, project implementation would include the demolition of an existing multi -tenant automotive center named The Autoplex, and the development of a self -storage facility. The proposed project would not remove housing and would not displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 86 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.14 Public Services Environmental Issues 14. PUBLIC SERVICES — Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of, or the need for, new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Costa Mesa is provided with emergency medical services, paramedic services, fire protection, prevention, and suppression, and hazardous material management services from the Costa Mesa Fire Department (CMFD). The CMFD respond from six fire stations located within the City and the closest station to the proposed project site is the Baker Station approximately 1.25 miles northeast from the project site located at 800 Baker St Costa Mesa, CA 92626. The goal of the Costa Mesa Fire Departments is to meet an emergency response time of five minutes at least 80 percent of the time (Costa Mesa GPEIR, 2000). Based on the project site's location of 1.25 miles from the nearest fire station, the CMFD would be able to respond within five minutes and meet the Department's goal. The existing use of the project site is a commercial auto -center and associated shops. The proposed project consists of the demolition of the auto -center and redevelopment of a two-story, self -storage facility with a management office and a multi -tenant food court building. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, it is required that the City of Costa Mesa Fire Department review and approve project design features to assess compliance with the CBC and California Fire Code. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 87 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Costa Mesa is provided with emergency medical services, paramedic services, fire protection, prevention, and suppression, and hazardous material management services from the Costa Mesa Fire Department (CMFD). The CMFD respond from six fire stations located within the City and the closest station to the proposed project site is the Baker Station approximately 1.25 miles northeast from the project site located at 800 Baker St Costa Mesa, CA 92626. The goal of the Costa Mesa Fire Departments is to meet an emergency response time of five minutes at least 80 percent of the time (Costa Mesa GPEIR, 2000). Based on the project site's location of 1.25 miles from the nearest fire station, the CMFD would be able to respond within five minutes and meet the Department's goal. The existing use of the project site is a commercial auto -center and associated shops. The proposed project consists of the demolition of the auto -center and redevelopment of a two-story, self -storage facility with a management office and a multi -tenant food court building. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, it is required that the City of Costa Mesa Fire Department review and approve project design features to assess compliance with the CBC and California Fire Code. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 87 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 The Applicant shall then pay the appropriate fee (if any) in effect to mitigate the project's proportionate impact to additional demands on fire protection services. The proposed project does not include new homes or businesses that would require any additional services or extended response times for fire protection services. Furthermore, the proposed project would not substantially alter the existing fire service demands associated with the current on-site uses and therefore, the CMFD would not be required to expand or construct new fire station locations to serve the project site. Therefore, less -than -significant impacts would occur with the proposed project. ii) Police protection? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Costa Mesa is provided with police protection services by the Costa Mesa Police Department (CMPD) and their headquarters is located approximately 1.4 miles southwest of the project site at 99 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626. It is required that the proposed project design and site plans are reviewed and approved by the Costa Mesa Building and Police Departments which ensures adequate safety and crime prevention measures are provided by the new development. The project would also comply with the City's discretionary review process. The proposed project does not include new homes or businesses that would require any additional services or extended response times for police protection services beyond those required with the existing on-site uses. Therefore, the CMPD would not be required to expand or construct new police stations to serve the project site. Less -than -significant impacts would occur with the proposed project. iii) Schools? No Impact. The project site lies within the Newport -Mesa Unified School District (NMUSD) service area. The student generation rates within (NMUSD) would not be substantially affected or altered by the redevelopment of the proposed project. The proposed redevelopment is a commercial use that would not affect local school enrollment. No school facilities would be impacted by the proposed project. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. iv) Parks? No Impact. The City of Costa Mesa contains approximately 1,708 acres of open space and parkland. This includes Neighborhood and Community Parks, Regional Nature Preserve areas, Community Centers, Institutional Uses, Open Space Easements, and Golf Courses. The City's standard for permanent public open space is 5.76 acres per 1,000 residents. The project would not interfere with or have adverse impacts on parks. The project would not involve new housing or employment opportunities that would prompt the need for new parks. No impacts are anticipated. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 88 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 V) Other public facilities? No Impact. The City of Costa Mesa contains three public libraries. The closest one to the project site is Costa Mesa Technology Library located approximately 1.75 miles southwest at 2263 Fairview Rd Costa Mesa, CA 92627. The proposed commercial redevelopment would not adversely impact this library or other public facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. References City of Costa Mesa, General Plan EIR, 2000. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 89 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.15 Recreation Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The proposed project is not growth inducing and would not increase the use of neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities. The proposed project does not involve the use, construction, or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The project is not growth inducing and thus does not propose recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which would have an adverse physical effect on the environment. The proposed project does not include the recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 90 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 15. RECREATION — Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the ❑ ❑ ❑ construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The proposed project is not growth inducing and would not increase the use of neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities. The proposed project does not involve the use, construction, or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The project is not growth inducing and thus does not propose recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which would have an adverse physical effect on the environment. The proposed project does not include the recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 90 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.16 Transportation and Traffic ❑ ❑ ❑ either an increase in traffic levels or a change in Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than ❑ Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC — incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Would the project: e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ❑ ❑ ® ❑ establishing measures of effectiveness for the ❑ ❑ performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of transit and non -motorized travel and relevant such facilities? components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ❑ ❑ ® ❑ program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ❑ ❑ ❑ either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location, that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ ❑ ❑ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ❑ ❑ ❑ regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? This section is based on the Trip Generation Assessment prepared by LLG (LLG, 2015), which is included as Appendix F, Transportation and Traffic Data. The Trip Generation Assessment Letter Report addresses the expected variation in site's existing baseline traffic generation potential due to the proposed redevelopment of the site. Existing Conditions The project site is currently developed with an automotive commercial center, with access from two- or three -lane one-way Bristol Street. Based on the project site's current floor area occupancy of approximately 84%, the site's current daily traffic generation totals about 1,228 trips per day (sum of both directions, inbound and outbound), as determined by driveways counts conducted using automatic video cameras). Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 91 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Less -than -Significant Impact. Table 4.16-1, Project Traffic Generation Forecast, summarizes the site's daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation calculations for the existing as well as redeveloped and General Plan Conditions. Trip generation rates used in the traffic forecast were estimated using the 9th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the City of Costa Mesa General Plan. The upper portion of Table 4.16-1 summarizes the trip generation rates used in documenting the existing full -occupancy trip generating potential of the site, and as a basis of forecasting the future project -related condition. Trip Making of Existing Site Occupancies Existing site occupancy generates 1,228 daily trips, with 60 trips generated during the AM peak hour, and 95 trips generated during the PM peak hour. The driveway count results are presented in Appendix F of this IS/MND. Fully Occupied Baseline Trip -Making Potential of Existing Center Subsection B of Table 4.16-1 combines the existing actual (empirically -collected) trip generation of the site (for existing occupancies) with a forecast (using empirically -derived trip rates at the site) for re -occupancy of the currently vacant 6,230 s£ Using those trip rates, a fully -occupied existing center would produce a baseline "driveway count" of 1,470 daily trips, with 72 trips (48 inbound, 24 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 114 trips (68 inbound, 46 outbound) during the PM peak hour. General Plan Trip -Making Potential The General Plan shows that the site is currently designated for General Commercial, which permits a floor area ratio (FAR) that varies from 0.75 to 0.20, depending on traffic intensity. For a conservative assessment, a FAR of 0.30 (Moderate Traffic FAR) was assumed in this analysis. Application of this FAR to the site area of 138,487 sf results in a permitted Moderate Traffic FAR site development of 41,546 sf (138,487 SF x 0.30 FAR= 41,546 SF). As shown in Subsection C of Table 4.16-1, this General Plan site characteristic is forecast to generate 1,687 daily trips, with 72 trips (46 inbound, 26 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 165 trips (77 inbound, 88 outbound) during the PM peak hour. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 92 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 TABLE 4.16-1 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily ITE Land Use Code / Project Description 2 -way Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Generation Rates' Empirical Autoplex Rates (TE Occupied/TSP) 38.80 67% 33% 1.90 60% 40% 3.00 ITE 151: Mini -Warehouse (TE/TSF) 2.50 55% 45% 0.14 50% 50% 0.26 ITE 932: High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 127.15 55% 45% 10.81 60% 40% 9.85 (TE/TSF) Costa Mesa General Plan General Commercial 40.60 1.11 0.63 1.74 1.85 2.12 3.97 (TE/TSF) Generation Forecasts A. Existing Site Existing Occupied Site Tripsb (31,653 SF) 1,228 40 20 60 57 38 95 A: Subtotal 1,228 40 20 60 57 38 95 B. Fully -Occupied Existing Floor Area (37,883 SF) Existing Occupied Site Tripsb (31,653 SF) 1,228 40 20 60 57 38 95 Existing Vacancy Trips (6,230 SF) 242 8 4 12 11 8 19 B: Subtotal 1,470 48 24 72 68 46 114 C. Permitted General Plan Floor Area (41,546 SF) - General Commercial 1,687 46 26 72 77 88 165 C: Subtotal 1,687 46 26 72 77 88 165 D. Proposed Project Self -Storage (100,000 SF) 250 8 6 14 13 13 26 Food Court Building (5,000 SF) 636 30 24 54 29 20 49 D: Subtotal 886 38 30 68 42 33 75 Fully -Occupied Existing Center Vs Existing Site 242 8 4 12 11 8 19 Occupancies (B -A) General Plan Vs Existing Site Occupancies (C - 459 6 6 12 20 50 70 A) Proposed Project Vs Existing Site Occupancies -342 -2 10 8 -15 -5 -20 (D -A) Proposed Project Vs Fully -Occupied Existing -584 -10 6 -4 -26 -13 -39 Floor Area (D -B) TE/TSF =Trip end per 1,000 square feet a Sources: Trip Generation, 9th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2012)], and Costa Mesa General Plan (2002). b Existing counts were conducted on Thursday, May 28, 2015. During the counts three suites consisting of 6,230 SF were vacant for a total occupancy of 31,653 SF. c The General Plan shows that the site is currently designated for General Commercial which has an FAR that varies from 0.75 to 0.20. For a conservative assessment an FAR of 0.30 (Moderate Traffic FAR) was assumed. Application of this FAR to the site area of 138,487 SF results in an entitled site development of 41,546 SF (138,487 SF x 0.30 FAR= 41,546 SF). SOURCE: LLG, 2015 Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 93 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Proposed Project Trip -Making Potential Subsection D of Table 4.16-1 shows the trip generation potential for the proposed project. While the proposed food court building could be interpreted as purely retail activity, a more conservative approach was used, where the entire food hall was assumed to be a high -turnover (sit-down) restaurant based in ITE Land Use Code 932. Based on that approach, the proposed project is forecast to generate 886 daily trips, with 68 trips (38 inbound, 30 outbound) in the AM peak hour, and 75 trips (42 inbound, 33 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour. Proposed Project Trips Compared to the actual site traffic, the proposed project would generate 342 fewer daily trips, 8 more (68 trips) AM peak hour trips, and 20 fewer (75 trips) PM peak hour trips. The AM peak hour trips increase is considered less than significant because it would not exceed the peak hour threshold for the City of Costa Mesa (50 or more net trips). Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not result in significant operational traffic increases. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less than Significant. Little to no long-term increase in traffic generation would occur as a result of the proposed project. Traffic along Bristol Street would be limited to equipment and materials deliveries during construction phases, and minimal traffic in and out of the project site would occur during operation, as described above. The proposed project would not include construction along any public roadway right-of-ways, and would not interfere with local traffic. The operational traffic and the short-term intermittent construction traffic resulting from the proposed project would not adversely affect level of service standards and travel demand measures for designated roads or highways. The impacts would be less than significant. C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location, that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The proposed project does not involve any aviation components or structures at heights that would potentially pose an aviation concern. No project activities would alter the existing air traffic patterns, levels, or locations that result in safety risks. No impact would occur. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. The proposed project would not alter existing roadways and would not include any hazardous design features such as sharp curves or dangerous intersections. No incompatible uses are proposed. In addition, the project would generate fewer daily vehicle trips than are generated currently. As such, no impacts would occur. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 94 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 e) Result in inadequate emergency access? Less than Significant Impact. Access to the project area would be from Bristol Street. Construction activities would be within the project site, would not require any lane or road closures, and would not interfere with traffic flow or emergency response access to the project area. On-site operational activities would include traffic in and out of the project site; however, it would be consistent with the commercial uses and would not result in interference with emergency response access. Impacts would be less than significant. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? No Impact. The project would not directly or indirectly eliminate alternative transportation corridors or facilities (e.g., bicycle lanes, bus routes/stops, etc.). In addition, the project would not include changes in policies or programs that support modes of alternative transportation. In addition, the proposed project would generate fewer daily vehicle trips than the existing conditions. As such, the proposed project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. References Linscott Law & Greenspan, Letter Report: Trip Generation Assessment for the Bristol Autoplex Site Proposed Bristol Food Market and Bristol Storage Project, 2015. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 95 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.17 Utilities and Service Systems Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Conflict with wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new ❑ ❑ ® ❑ stormwater drainage facilities, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ ® ❑ project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ® ❑ provider that would serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ❑ ® ❑ capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ❑ ® ❑ regulations related to solid waste? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Less than Significant Impact. The Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, issued an NPDES permit that implements federal and state law governing point source discharges and nonpoint source discharges to surface waters of the United States. Construction and operation of the proposed project would generate a minimal volume of wastewater and would only nominally increase wastewater generation. Based on the scope of the project, the proposed project would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Santa Ana Region of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and impacts would be less than significant. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 96 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant Impact. Water Supply and Demand The project site is located within the Division 1, Mesa Consolidated Water District (Mesa Water) service area. Mesa Water provides water service to an 18 -square -mile area that includes the city of Costa Mesa, parts of Newport Beach, and parts of unincorporated Orange County. In compliance with legislative requirements, Mesa Water has prepared their 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), which provides information on the present and future water resources and demands, and assesses water resource needs. After review of the UWMP, Mesa Water's main sources of water supply are groundwater pumped from wells within the Orange County Basin and imported water from Metropolitan Water District of Southern California through Municipal Water District of Orange County. Project implementation would not result in a substantial permanent population increase as it includes the redevelopment of 103,800 sf of commercial space. The increase in water demand would place an incremental increase in the demand for water supplies and treatment facilities. Project implementation would generate a demand for approximately 22,836 gallons per day.2 The increase is not considered substantial, since the project is consistent with the site's General Plan land use designation and City General Plan form the basis for evaluating the service area's future water demands. Mesa Water has concluded they are capable of meeting the water demands of their customers in normal, single dry, and multiple dry years between 2015 and 2035. Water Treatment and Conveyance Groundwater is pumped from six wells that pump clear water from the Orange County Basin and two wells that pump colored water. The colored water is treated at the Colored Water Treatment Facility (CWTF) and imported water is treated at the Diemer Filtration Plant, and then delivered to Mesa Water through the imported water connections (Mesa Water, 2010). The applicant would be responsible for construction of all water conveyance facilities pursuant to current Uniform Codes, City Ordinances, Public Works standards, and Water Division criteria. As concluded, the project would result in a negligible increase in water supply or demand and therefore the impact on existing water treatment facilities and existing water conveyance is less - than -significant impact. Therefore, project implementation would not require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. 2 Based on water use factor of 0.22 gallons per day per square foot of commercial uses. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 97 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Wastewater Supply and Demand The project site is located within the Costa Mesa Sanitary District (Sanitary District) service area which includes the City, the city of Newport Beach, and the unincorporated county. There would be a slight increase of wastewater generated due to the operation of the proposed food court. The increase in wastewater generation would place an incremental increase in the demand for wastewater conveyance and treatment facilities. The project would be consistent with the site's General Plan land use designation and City General Plans form the basis for issuance of the County Sanitation's NPDES wastewater discharge permits. Wastewater Treatment and Conveyance Wastewater collected is sent to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (County Sanitation) plants for treatment and disposal. County Sanitation has a 479 -square -mile service area which collects, treats, and disposes of wastewater generated. Wastewater is treated at treatment plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. County Sanitation operates under an NPDES ocean discharge permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The project's increase in wastewater generation is not considered substantial because the project is consistent with the site's General Plan land use designation and City General Plans form the basis for issuance of the NPDES wastewater discharge permits. The Sanitary District's facilities include 216 miles of mainline, 114 miles of private property sewer lateral pipelines, and 20 pumping stations. The applicant would be responsible for construction of all wastewater conveyance facilities pursuant to current Uniform Codes, City Ordinances, and Public Works standards. The Sanitary District would issue a Sewer Service Confirmation Letter indicating that they will serve sanitary sewer to the project. Service to the project would be conditioned upon approval of sewer infrastructure construction plans by the Sanitary District's Engineers, processing of easements, and payment of all applicable fees (OCSD 2016). The proposed project would result in a negligible increase in wastewater generation and would not exceed the treatment plants' operating capacities or existing wastewater conveyance facilities. Therefore, implementation would not require the construction or expansion of new wastewater conveyance facilities. C) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant Impact. The project would not require the expansion of any off-site stormwater drainage facilities. The proposed drainage pattern is similar to the existing condition except the proposed site will runoff into biofiltration BMPs before discharging into the storm drain system. The existing 18 -inch on-site storm drain would be relocated away from the proposed structures and placed within a proposed sidewalk and on-site traffic circulation system. The 18 -inch on-site storm drain system would collect stormwater from the eastern half of the Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 98 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 project site. Existing 6 -inch, 12 -inch, and 18 -inch on-site storm drains would remain it their current locations and continue to collect stormwater from the western half of the project site. The 18 -inch on-site storm drain in the eastern portion of the project site would convey stormwater to the existing Santa Ana -Delhi channel near the southeastern corner of the project site. The 18 -inch on-site storm drain in the southwestern portion of the project site would convey stormwater to the Santa Ana -Delhi channel in the southern portion of the project site. The use of filtration planter boxes and bioretention with underdrains would be used to treat runoff and site drainage. Runoff from the building will be collected using roof downspouts that will flow directly into the top of the filtration planter boxes, where it will be filtered, then discharged into the street at the curb face. Infiltration on-site is not feasible because of the low infiltration rate of the underlying soil. Inlet risers are designed to allow the silt and pollutants to settle within the planter boxes, and the peak flows to overflow into the inlet riser (PSOMAS 2015). The construction of the on-site stormwater drainage facilities would be designed in accordance with the City Storm Water Manual and MS 4 Permit requirements, including implementation of BMPs to ensure surface water quality protection. Therefore, the project would result in a less -than -significant environmental impact to new or existing stormwater drainage facilities. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less than Significant Impact. Senate Bill 610 Water Code Sections 10610 to 10656 require water suppliers to prepare an UWMP to promote water demand management and efficient use in their service areas. UWMPs are included with the environmental document for specified projects. In compliance with legislative requirements, Mesa Water has prepared their 2010 UWMP, which provides information on the present and future water resources and demands. According to the Guidebook for Implementation of Senate Bill (SB) 610 requires the preparation of a water supply assessment for inclusion in environmental documentation for certain projects, as defined in Water Code 10912[a], subject to CEQA. SB 610 requires that a water supply assessment be prepared for any "project" that would consist of one or more of the following: • A proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units • A proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 sq. ft. of floor space • A proposed commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 sq. ft. of floor space • A proposed hotel and motel having more than 500 rooms • A proposed industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant, or an industrial park planned to house more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 sq. ft. of floor area Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 99 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 • A mixed-use project that includes one or more of the projects specified in this subdivision • A project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500 dwelling unit project The measure defined above does not apply to the proposed project development because the project does not meet any of the above definitions of a "project" under SB 610. Thus, a water supply assessment is not warranted to verify that sufficient water supplies are available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources. The project would not need new or expanded entitlements for water supply, and would result in a less -than -significant impact. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less than Significant Impact. According to County Sanitation's treatment plant operational data, the combined effluent treated at both plants (2004-2005) totaled approximately 244 million gallons daily (average). Project implementation would generate a demand for approximately 22,836 gallons per day. The project's increase in wastewater generation is not considered substantial, since the project is consistent with the site's General Plan land use designation and City General Plans form the basis for issuance of the NPDES wastewater discharge permits. The existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant would be adequate to serve the proposed project. Therefore, the project would result in a less -than -significant impact on the existing capacity of the wastewater treatment plant. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in the demolition of an existing 37,883 sq. ft. multi -tenant automotive center and redevelopment of a two-story, 98,800 square foot, self -storage facility and 5,000 sq. ft. court pad building. Demolition and construction activities would generate debris. Operation and maintenance of the proposed self -storage facility would result in minimal trash generation, mainly personal waste generated by operation and maintenance crews. Furthermore, the food court would contribute food and food establishment solid waste. The City is served by three landfills: Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, Olinda Alpha Sanitary Landfill, and the Prima Deschecha Sanitary Landfill. Based on generation rates of 5 pounds per 1,000 square feet of commercial space per day, the proposed project could generate an estimated 519 pounds per day or 94.72 tons (435.31 cubic yards) of solid waste per year, which is less than 0.0001 percent of the remaining capacity. With a combined total of 328,974,506 cubic yards of remaining capacity, waste generated during project construction and operation would be minimal, and the three landfills that serve the City would have the capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. (Calrecycle, 2014). The City would continue to comply with existing regulatory framework for reducing solid waste disposal volumes and address District consultation to abide by Costa Mesa Sanitary requirements. Impacts regarding remaining landfill capacity would be less than significant. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 100 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less than Significant Impact. The project would be required to be in compliance with all federal, state, and local statutes related to solid waste. These regulations include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which provides the federal government with "cradle to grave" authority over the disposal of solid waste and hazardous materials. The project would also be required to comply with Assembly Bills 939 and 1327, which require measures to enhance recycling and source reduction. Thus, impacts related to compliance with regulations related to solid waste would be less than significant. References California Department of Water Resources. Guidebook for Implementation of Senate Bill 610 and Senate Bill 221 of 2001. October 8, 2003. Costa Mesa Sanitary District. 2013. Costa Mesa Sanitary District Boundary Map. Website: http://www.cmsdca.gov/images/sewer/sewer—boundary_map.pdf. Accessed June 2014. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. Mesa Consolidated Water District. May 2011. PSOMAS. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan. December 16, 2015. Orange County Sanitation District. <http://www.ocsd.com/about-ocsd/general- information/facilities>. Accessed January 26, 2016. Cal Recycle, Landfill Capacity, Accessed at www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Search/default.aspx?q=lanfill+capacity on January 26, 2016. Cal Recycle, History of CA Solid Waste, Accessed at <www.calrecycle.ca.gov/laws/legislation/calhist/1985tol989.htm on January 26, 2016. CA Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, Fact Sheet, Accessed at <www.co.imperial.ca.us/publicwork/PDFdocuments/fact%20sheet%20recycling.pdf on January 26, 2016. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 10 1 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 4.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Environmental Issues Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE — Would the project: a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of the ® ❑ environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but ❑ ® ❑ cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Have environmental effects that would cause ❑ ® ❑ ❑ substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Environmental Evaluation Would the project: a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. There are biological resources present in the area like ornamental trees that could provide suitable nesting habitat for bird species. Therefore, the project has the potential to degrade the quality of the environment associated with nesting habitat. This potential degradation could result in a significant impact on nesting birds. Furthermore, the records search indicated that total of three prehistoric archaeological sites (CA - OR -174; CA -OR -687; CA -OR -1223) were recorded within a'/2 -mile radius of the project site, one of which is located within the project site. The project site has been subject to extensive disturbance during the construction of the existing commercial center. Although the project site has been previously disturbed, construction activities associated with the project could result in significant impacts to unknown archaeological resources. Mitigation Measure Implementation of Mitigation Measures 13I0-1, 13I0-2, CUL -1 and CUL -2 is required. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 102 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Significance After Mitigation Implementation of the above referenced mitigation measures would reduce the project impacts on biological and cultural resources to less than significant. b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Less than Significant with Mitigation. The project would result in several potentially significant project -level impacts in the following areas: Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Noise. The project's contribution to cumulative impacts to Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Noise would be cumulatively considerable, and therefore, would result in significant cumulative impacts. Mitigation Measure Implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -1, BIO -1, BIO -2, CUL -1, CUL -2, CUL -3, HAZ-1, NOI-1 and NOI-2 is required. Significance After Mitigation Implementation of the above referenced mitigation measures would reduce the project's contribution to potential cumulative impacts to less than cumulatively considerable. Therefore, the proposed project would result in less -than -significant cumulative impacts after the implementation of the above mitigation measures. C) Have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less than Significant with Mitigation. The proposed project would result in potentially significant project -level impacts in the following areas: Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Noise. However, the impacts that could result in significant adverse impacts on human beings include the impacts associated with Air Quality, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and Noise. Mitigation Measure Implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR -1, HAZ-1, NOI-1 and NOI-2 is required. Significance After Mitigation Implementation of the above referenced mitigation measures would reduce the project's potential adverse effects on human beings to less than significant. Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 103 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Section 5: Consultant Recommendation Based on the information and environmental analysis contained in this Initial Study, we recommend that the City of Costa Mesa prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Bristol Mini Storage Facility and Food Court Building Project. We find that the project could have a significant effect on a number of environmental issues, but that the specified mitigation measures would reduce such impacts to less than significant. We recommend that the second category, which specifies preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, be selected for the City's determination; refer to Section 3.3, Lead Agency Determination. Date: 05/05/2016 Signed: x Arab sq e Said-Abdelwa , Project Manager Environmental Science Associates Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 104 ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 Section 6: Report Preparation Personnel Environmental Science Associates 17744 Skypark Circle, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 Project Director..........................................................................................Michael Houlihan, AICP Project Manager.................................................................................. Arabesque Said-Abdelwahed Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Specialist.................................................................. Tim Morgan Noise Specialist................................................................................................... Susumu Shirayama Analyst..................................................................................................................... Katelyn Matroni Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) 105 ESA / 150652 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 APPENDIX A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Modeling Data Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) ESA / 150652 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 31 Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 100.00 1000sgft 2.30 100,000.00 0 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru ; 5.00 ; 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Architectural Coating - From PD, following SCAQMD guide for interior/exterior areas Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2019 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ; ConstArea_Nonresidentlal_Exterior 52,500.00 26,250.00 i........................................................................... .. ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 157,500.00 78,750.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF—Residential—Exterior 100.00 0.00 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential _Interior 50.00 0.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 i.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 264.00 i..............................................................................;...............................................................................:...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 i.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00 i........................................................................... .... ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 5.00 .. i.............................................................................I........................................................................... ... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseEndDate ; 12/20/2018 1/4/2019 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/19/2019 1/21/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/16/2017 1/2/2018 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/2/2017 12/4/2017 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;.................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 11/25/2017 11/27/2017 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblGrading AcresOfGrading 5.00 3.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblGrading ; AcresOfGrading 7.50 4.50 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..............................................................................:...................................................................... tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear ; 2014 2019 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 ; 0.0769 i 0.7686 0.5915 7.6000e- i 0.0578 0.0438 i 0.1016 0.0212 0.0408 i 0.0619 i 68.6251 1 0.0161 i 0.0000 68.9641 1 7.6000e- 1 0.0578 004 1 r I 68.6250 0.0161 .: 68.9640 2018 ; 0.4081 2.8606 2.4913 4.3100e- 0.0621 0.1657 0.2278 0.0168 0.1587 0.1755 i ; :003 i 357.4677 i 0.0611 0.0000 004.........................� ..................................... .......................................*..................:...................................... .................................................'...................1...................1...................1................. ............. .............. ............. ...............................+..................:...................1.........................................................[358.7514 .. �... ...`... . ' ...' .. ' ................. 2019 ;i 0.6210 0.1073 0.1044 1.7000e- 1.9700e- 6.1600e- 8.1300e- 1 5.3000e- l 5.7800e- 6.3100e- 14.7275 3.4200e- 0.0000 14.7993 i 4.3100e- 0.0621 ,i 004 003 003 003 I 004 I 003 003 003 357.4674 1 0.0611 0.0000 358.7511 Total 1.1060 3.7365 3.1871 5.2400e- 0.1219 0.2156 0.3375 0.0385 0.2052 0.2437 •................... 0.1044 440.8204 0.0807 0.0000 442.5148 0.0000 11 r 003 004 003 003 003 004 003 003 ; r 003 Total 1.1060 3.7365 1 5.2400e- Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 ; 0.0769 0.7686 0.5915 1 7.6000e- 1 0.0578 0.0438 0.1016 0.0212 0.0408 0.0619 ; I 68.6250 0.0161 0.0000 68.9640 '0................... ................. ... ..... 004.........................� ..................................... .......................................*..................:...................................... .................... 2018 �1 ; 0.4081 1 2.8606 1 2.4913 i 4.3100e- 0.0621 0.1657 0.2278 0.0168 0.1587 0.1755 357.4674 1 0.0611 0.0000 358.7511 ;i 003 2019 .i .... ; 0.6210 0.1073 •................... 0.1044 •...................' 1.7000e- i 1.9700e- ------------------- '------------------ - 6.1600e- 8.1300e- 1 5.3000e- 1 5.7800e- 6.3100e- ; 14.7275 i 3.4200e- 0.0000 14.7993 r 004 003 003 003 004 003 003 ; r 003 Total 1.1060 3.7365 3.1871 5.2400e- 0.1219 0.2156 0.3375 0.0385 0.2052 0.2437 440.8199 0.0807 0.0000 442.5144 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Waste ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 r r 49.1446 r r r r ; Water 1 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 5.7504 0.5906 0.0140 r. r r. r r. r 22.4767 Total 1.1726 1.9242 7.2280 0.0199 1.3222 0.0321 1.3543 0.3538 0.0300 0.3838 11,510.56291 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area ; 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ;I 2.6100e- I 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- ; 005 003 ; 003 005 ; 003 r ______________ ___ __ .......... ___ __ r ................... .. _ Energy ; 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0496 3.5000e- i 4.4800e- i 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- ; 64.2100 i 1 2300e- 1 1800e- : 64.6008 003 i 004 i 003 r .; 003 003 003 003 003 : i i Mobile ; 0.6649 1.8652 1 7.1771 1 0.0195 1 1.3222 0.0276 1.3498 1 0.3538 0.0255 0.3793 ; 11,418.67081 0.0522 0.0000 r r 1,419.7671 r r r r Waste ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 r r 49.1446 r r r r ; Water 1 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 5.7504 0.5906 0.0140 r. r r. r r. r 22.4767 Total 1.1726 1.9242 7.2280 0.0199 1.3222 0.0321 1.3543 0.3538 0.0300 0.3838 11,510.56291 1.9400 0.0151 1,555.9919 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area ; 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 2.7500e- : 005 003 003 005 003 ; ; : ; : .: Ener 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0496 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 9Y �� � 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 I... °... I... �.. ..............................':...................°................... i...................I................... i................ ' ................:...................I................. ..... .............. ............. Mobile ; 0.6649 1.8652 7.1771 0.0195 1.3222 0.0276 1.3498 0.3538 0.0255 0.3793 1,418.6708 0.0522 0.0000 11,419.7671 0.00 �; .... .... ;... ... ..... ....... .............. .............. Waste ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 21.9291 1 1.2960 1 0.0000 49.1446 ; �. .................... .............. .............. .............. ............. Water; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.7504 0.5906 0.0140 22.4767 ii Total 1.1726 1.9242 7.2280 0.0199 1.3222 0.0321 1.3543 0.3538 0.0300 0.3838 1,510.5629 1.9400 0.0151 1,555.9919 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 :Demolition :Demolition ;10/2/2017 11/24/2017 5E 40 ................;............................................................. 2 :Site Preparation :Site Preparation ;11/27/2017 :12/1/2017 5 5 ............................................................. ..................................................... ........................... ........................... ............................................. .............................................................. 3 :Grading :Grading 112/4/2017 :12/15/2017 5 10 4 ;Building Construction ;Building Construction ;1/2/2018 1/4/2019 5 264 ...............;............................................................. 5 ;Paving ;Paving ;1/7/2019 1/18/2019 5 10 ...............;............................................................. 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5 5 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 78,750; Non -Residential Outdoor: 26,250 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition ;Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.001 811 0.73 ........................................................................... ............................. ............................... ......................................... ............................................... .................................... ..................................... Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 : 8.00:: 255:: 0.40 .................................................................................................................................... Demolition ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ............................................................................... 3: .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Site Preparation .Graders1...................................................................... ; r ............................................ .................................. .................................... 8.00:: 1741: ..................................... 0.41 .......................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... Scrapers . ............................................................................. 1 .................................... 8.001 3611 ..................................... 0.48 ........................................................................... Site Preparation ......................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 7.001 971 0.37 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... ;Graders ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.00:: 174:: ..................................... 0.41 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... i Rubber Tired Dozers . ........................................................................ 1 .................................... 8.00 255 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Grading ......................................................... . ... iTractors/Loaders/Backhoes i . .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 7.001 971 0.37 .......................................................................... Building Construction i ..................................................................... Cranes . .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 8.00 2261 0.29 .......................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................................................................ .................................... ..................................... Building Construction Forklifts 2:: 7.00:: 891 0.20 .................................................................................................................................................. Building Construction :Generator Sets r ............................................................................... .................................... 8.00:: 84:: 1 ..................................... 0.74 .......................................................................... Building Construction ...................................................................... . ............................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 .................................... 6.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Building Construction ......................................... ............................. ;Welders . ..................................... ............................................................................................................. 3 8.00 46: 0.45 ........................................................................... Paving ................................................................. ;Cement and Mortar Mixers ............................................................................... .................................... 8.001: 9: ..................................... 0.56 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Pavers ............................................................................... 1 .......................................................................... 8.001 1251 0.42 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Paving Equipment ......................................................................... ................................... 8.00 130:: 0.36 ................................................................................................................................................. Paving Rollers 4 .................................................................................................................... A 8.001 801 ..................................... 0.38 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . ......................................................................... i 11 .................................... 8.001 97:: 0.37 .......................................................................... Architectural Coating ...................................................................... Air Compressors .................................. .................................... 6.00: 78:: ..................................... 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 51 13.00; 0.00; 172.00'• 14.70: 6.90; 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ........................ Site Preparation 31 8.00: 0.00': ........................... 0.00: .............................. 14.70: 6.90: -� 20.00; LD Mix ' HDT_Mix HHDT ...................................................--------------------------------r---------------------------............................ Grading 4i 10.00; ;..........................�---------------------..............................-------------------------r----...................................................................................... 0.001 0.00; 14.70; 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix :HDTMix HHDT ........................ Building Construction 81 r 34.00: ;.......................... 17.001 0.00 .. 14.70: ........................ :.. ... 6.90: . 20.00: LID .. HDT_Mix ........................... HHDT ........................... Paving 6 ....................................................... 15.00 0.001 . 0.00; 14.70 6.90; -------------------------- 20.00 LID Mix "HDT_Mix '...... ,............ HHDT .............................................................................. .................................. ---------- ...................... -------------------------- Architectural Coating 1: 7.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: ...................... 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix ...................... : HDT_Mix ..................... : HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ; 0.0187 0.0000 0.0187 2.8200e- I 0.0000 2.8200e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; ; : ; 003 003 i ; .................... .......... t•• ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................,...................;................... ....................................... Off -Road ; 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0321 0.0321 0.0300 0.0300 44.5876 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 004 Total 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0187 0.0321 0.0508 2.8200e- 0.0300 0.0329 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 004 003 1 174.5876 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 1.4400e- 0.0228 0.0181 6.000Oe- 1.4700e- 3.4000e- 1.8200e- i 4.000Oe- I 3.1000e- 7.2000e- 5.6970 4.000Oe- i 0.0000 5.6979 : : : : : : 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 : 005 : Off -Road ; 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 1 4.9000e- 0.0321 0.0321 0.0300 0.0300 ; i 44.5875 i 0.0113 0.0000 .: ;i 004 ; .i Vendor 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.00000.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0187 0.0321 : : i i ' ; `................... ..............................«. .................................................. .............. .............. .............. ............. ................+..................i...................;...................;................... .. ...... .. ..... ..... ..... .... ...... .............. ................... Worker ; 9.4000e- 1.3900e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 2.8500e- 2.000Oe- 2.8800e- 7.6000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- i 2.5699 1.3000e- 0.0000 2.5727 ;1 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Total 2.3800e- 0.0242 0.0325 1.000Oe- 4.3200e- 3.6000e- 4.7000e- 1.1600e- 3.3000e- 1.5000e- 8.2669 1.7000e- 0.0000 8.2706 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust; 0.0187 0.0000 0.0187 + 2.8200e- I 0.0000 I 2.8200e- ; 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 ' ii......................................................................................................................................i..................:............................................................................ ..............................r...................;..................................... . . Off -Road ; 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 1 4.9000e- 0.0321 0.0321 0.0300 0.0300 ; i 44.5875 i 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 ;i 004 ; .i Total 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0187 0.0321 0.0508 2.8200e- 0.0300 0.0329 44.5875 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 1.4400e- 0.0228 0.0181 6.000Oe- 1.4700e- 3.4000e- 1.8200e- i 4.000Oe- I 3.1000e- 7.2000e- 5.6970 4.000Oe- i 0.0000 5.6979 : : : : : : V 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 : 005 : Off -Road ; 6.3200e- : 0.0716 0.0428 16.000Oe- i 3.4900e- i 3.4900e- i I 3.2100e- 3.2100e- ; 5.5326 i 1.7000e- i 0.0000 .: 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .: Vendor 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.00000.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0428 6.000Oe- 2.3900e- 3.4900e- : : i i ; `................... ..............................«. .................................................. .............. .............. .............. ............. ................+..................i...................;...................;................... .. ...... .. ..... ..... ..... .... ...... .............. ................... Worker ; 9.4000e- 1.3900e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 2.8500e- 2.000Oe- 2.8800e- 7.6000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- i 2.5699 1.3000e- 0.0000 2.5727 003 ;1 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Total 2.3800e- 0.0242 0.0325 1.000Oe- 4.3200e- 3.6000e- 4.7000e- 1.1600e- 3.3000e- 1.5000e- 8.2669 1.7000e- 0.0000 8.2706 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ; i 2.3900e- I 0.0000 2.3900e- i 2.6000e- i 0.0000 2.6000e- ; 0.00000.00 00 i 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 .............................................................................T................................................................................................................ Off -Road ; 6.3200e- : 0.0716 0.0428 16.000Oe- i 3.4900e- i 3.4900e- i I 3.2100e- 3.2100e- ; 5.5326 i 1.7000e- i 0.0000 5.5682 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .: Total 6.3200e- 0.0716 0.0428 6.000Oe- 2.3900e- 3.4900e- 5.8800e- 2.6000e- 3.2100e- 3.4700e- 5.5326 1.7000e- 0.0000 5.5682 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........:........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;....... ............ ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.3200e- 0.0716 ..............................« .................i ....... i ........E....................'...................`...................'...................'....................+ .0000....2.20 ..................i.`................... '.... ............... `................ .................. W orker 7.000Oe- 1. 0 1110 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 3.2100e- 005 003 004 004 005 005 i 005 Total 7.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.1100e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 003 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 1 2.3900e- 0.0000 2.3900e- 2.6000e- 0.00 2.6000 00 e- 0.0000 0.0000° 0.0000 0.0000 003 0 00 4 004 ..............................r................................i.......................................T------------......................... ................... ; ................... 3.4900e- 3.4900e- 3.2100e- 3.2100e -Off -Road 6.3200e 0.0716 0.0428 6.000Oe- 5.5325 i 1.7000e- i 0.0000 5.5681 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .: Total 6.3200e- 0.0716 0.0428 6.000Oe- 2.3900e- 3.4900e- 5.8800e- 2.6000e- 3.2100e- 3.4700e- 5.5325 1.7000e- 0.0000 5.5681 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........:........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;....... ............ ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0135 0.1408 ..............................« .................i ....... i ........E....................'...................`...................'...................'....................+ .0000....2.20 ..................i.`................... '.... ............... `................ .................. W orker 7.000Oe- 1. 0 1110 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 0.0239 005 003 004 004 005 005 i 005 Total 7.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.1100e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr i i I � i i Fugitive Dust 0.0317 0.0000 0.0317 0.0167 0.0000 0.0167 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .................................................;...................---------................................................................................ :...................--....................................... �- Off -Road ; 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 I 1.000Oe- i 7.7800e- i 7.7800e- i I 7.1500e- 7.1500e- ; 9.5462 i 2.9200e- i 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 Total 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 1.000Oe- 0.0317 7.7800e- 0.0395 0.0167 7.15007 0.0239 9.5462 2.9200e- 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road ; 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 I 1.000Oe- i 7.7800e- i 7.7800e- i I 7.1500e- 7.1500e- ; 9.5462 i 2.92OOe- i 0.0000 �• r :... :... I... :... r W orker «... ......................................................... ...:... ...:... ..:... �? 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 , 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- ,..............................................................................................1................... 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 0.0395 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 Total 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr i i I � i i Fugitive Dust 0.0317 0.0000 0.0317 0.0167 0.0000 0.0167 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .................................................;...................---------................................................................................ :...................--....................................... �- Off -Road ; 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 I 1.000Oe- i 7.7800e- i 7.7800e- i I 7.1500e- 7.1500e- ; 9.5462 i 2.92OOe- i 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 Total 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 1.000Oe- 0.0317 7.7800e- 0.0395 0.0167 7.15007 0.0239 9.5462 2.9200e- 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; • ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 �• r :... :... I... :... r W orker «... ......................................................... ...:... ...:... ..:... �? 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 , 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- ,..............................................................................................1................... 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 0.1626 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 Total 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 1 0.1626 0.1626 0.1559 0.1559 ; i 273.2778 0.0587 + 0.0000 274.5111 003 Total 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 0.1626 0.1626-70.15591 .16260.1559 0.1559 273.2778 0.0587 0.0000 274.5111 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: ...................:...................:...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................; i ;i 0.01680.1665 0.2335 4.8000e- 0.0136 2.6500e- 0.0163 3.8800e- I 2.4400e- 6.3200e- ................... ;................... ;................ ... 42.1329 3.000Oe- i 0.0000 42.1393 003 �• : : 004 003 003 003 003 r : 004 i E i 0.3771 Worker ;i 0.0143 0.0214 i 0.2215 6.000Oe- 0.0485 3.9000e- 0.0489 0.0129 3.6000e- 0.0132 42.0571 2.1000e- 0.0000 42.1011 0.1626 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 0.1559 Total 0.0311 0.1878 0.4550 1.0800e- 0.0621 3.0400e- 0.0651 0.0168 2.8000e- 0.0196 84.1900 2.4000e- 0.0000 84.2404 003 003 1 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 1 0.1626 0.1626 0.1559 0.1559 ; i 273.2774 0.0587 + 0.0000 274.5107 003 Total 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 0.1626 0.1626-70.15591 .16260.1559 0.1559 273.2774 0.0587 0.0000 274.5107 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: ...................:...................:...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................; i ;i 0.01680.1665 0.2335 4.8000e- 0.0136 2.6500e- 0.0163 3.8800e- I 2.4400e- 6.3200e- ................... ;................... ;................ ... 42.1329 3.00OOe- i 0.0000 42.1393 003 005 003 003 003 003 r �• : : 004 003 003 003 003 r : 004 i E i 5.0900e- Worker ;i 0.0143 0.0214 i 0.2215 6.00OOe- 0.0485 3.9000e- 0.0489 0.0129 3.6000e- 0.0132 42.0571 2.1000e- 0.0000 42.1011 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 2.0800e- 2.0800e- Total 0.0311 0.1878 0.4550 1.0800e- 0.0621 3.0400e- 0.0651 0.0168 2.8000e- 0.0196 84.1900 2.4000e- 0.0000 84.2404 003 003 003 1 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I 1 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 5.0900e- i 0.0376 0.0304 5.00OOe- i i 2.1700e- 2.1700e- i 2.0800e- 2.0800e- ; 4.1727 8.7000e- i 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 r � 004 Total 5.0900e- 0.0376 0.0304 5.00OOe- 2.1700e- 2.1700e- 2.0800e- 2.0800e- 4.1727 8.7000e- 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.11,111,111,11"**",.*********..........,.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................;...................;...................;................... Vendor .: . ; : i ; 2.4000e- 2.3600e- 3.4700e- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 14.000Oe- 2.5000e- i 6.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 1.000Oe- . 0.6356 0.0000 0.0000 0.6357 004 � �• 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 r .............................. �; I i i ° «...................'.........................................................•...................'......................................`...................'................... I....................+...................................... r `...................'.................................... ...................... W orker 2.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.6224 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6230 2.1700e- 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 4.4000e- 2.6600e- 6.5900e- 2.000Oe- 9.6000e- 5.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.6000e- 5.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.2580 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2587 003 004 003 003 005 004 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Im tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 5.0900e- 0.0376 0.0304 5.000Oe- 2.1700e- 2.1700e- i 2.0800e- 2.0800e- ; 4.1727 8.7000e- i 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 r 004 � Total 5.0900e- 0.0376 0.0304 5.000Oe- 2.1700e- 2.1700e- 2.0800e- 2.0800e- 4.1727 8.7000e- 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.11,111,111,11"**",.*********..........,...................,...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................;...................;...................;................... Vendor .: : ; : i ; 2.4000e- 2.3600e- 3.4700e- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 14.000Oe- 2.5000e- i 6.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.6356 0.0000 0.0000 0.6357 Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �• 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 r .............................. �; I i i ° «...................'.........................................................•...................'......................................`...................'................... I....................+...................................... r `...................'.................................... ...................... W orker 2.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 7.50007- 1.00007- 7.50007- 2.00007- 1.00007- 2.00007- 0.6224 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6230 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 4.4000e- 2.6600e- 6.5900e- 2.000Oe- 9.6000e- 5.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.6000e- 5.000Oe- 3.000Oe- I 1.2580 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2587 004 003 003 005 004 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road :i 6.16007- i 0.0621 0.0585 19.00007- I 3.61007- i 3.61007- 3.33007- 3.33007- ; 7.8119 2.4200e- i 0.0000 7.8628 ji 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 ..... ..... .... .............................. r .................... ..................�................ .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ................. i................................................................................... ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.1600e- 0.0621 0.0585 9.00007 3.6100e- 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- 7.8119 2.4200e- 0.0000 7.8628 003 005 1 003 1 003 I I 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; : • ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �• r 0.0621 : r ..:... ...:... ...:... ..:... ........................... ,..............................................................................................1................... W orker fl 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 7.8119 ;; 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 . 005 Total 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr • Off -Road ; 6.1600e- 1 0.0621 1 0.0585 1 9.000Oe- 1 3.6100e- I 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- ; 7.8119 I 2.4200e- + 0.0000 ttE 7.8628 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 ( I �.................... �................... �................... �: 1 1 ...................j................... i ....................................... -..................• . .................. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.1600e- 0.0621 0.0585 9.0000 3.6100e- 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- 7.8119 2.4200e- 0.0000 7.8628 003 005 1 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; : • ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;.......................................;...............................................................................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 6.7000e- .5900e- 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.6383 5.000Oe- i 0.0000 ; �• r : r 4.6000e- ............................. .............. ..:... ...:... ...:... ..:... ,..............................................................................................1................... W orker fl 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 3.2000e- 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 . 005 Total 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 004 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.6083 i i 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ................... �...............................�.................................. ................r..................i4................................................i.................. ................ ..................i; .............. ............. ............�i.. .............. .............. ............. Off -Road 6.7000e- .5900e- 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.6383 5.000Oe- i 0.0000 ; 0.6395 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 Total 0.6090 4.5900e- 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.6383 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6395 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................:.... .............. ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; I : 4.6000e- i i i W orker 5.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 0.0000 1.9000e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.1602 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1603 3.2000e- 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Total 5.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 8.00010e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 5.0000e- 004 0.1602 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1603 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.6083 i i 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ................... �...............................�.................................. ................r..................i4................................................i.................. ................ ..................i; .............. ............. ............�i.. .............. .............. ............. Off -Road 6.7000e- .5900e- 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.6383 5.000Oe- i 0.0000 ; 0.6394 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 Total 0.6090 4.5900e- 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.6383 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6394 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 71 0.0195 1.3222 1 0.0276 1.3498 0.3538 0.0255 I 1,418.67081 0.0522 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........;........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;....... ............ ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3538 ; I : 1,418.6708; 0.0522 i I i W orker 5.00OOe- 8.00OOe- 8.00OOe- 0.0000 1.9000e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 5.00OOe- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 0.1602 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1603 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Total 5.00OOe- 8.00OOe- 8.00OOe- 0.0000 1.9000e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 5.00OOe- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 0.1602 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1603 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated ; 0.6649 1.86527.17 71 0.0195 1.3222 1 0.0276 1.3498 0.3538 0.0255 0.3793 1,418.67081 0.0522 0.0000 111,419.7671 : Unmitigated ; 0.6649 1.8652 7.1771 0.0195 1.3222 0.0276 1.3498 0.3538 0.0255 0.3793 ; 1,418.6708; 0.0522 0.0000 :1,419.7671 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW . 1,142.00 i......._164.00 76.00 ; 2,871,853 ; 2,871,853 ..................Office .Park .......................................................;. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru i. 450.30 450.30 450.30 ............................................................................................................ 616,260 616,260 Total 1,592.30 614.30 526.30 3,488,113 3,488,113 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by W Office Park I 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.0048.00 3 119.00 ; 82 ; 15 ; 3 ..............................:................................................................................. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 .......................... ............................................................ 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr MT/yr 5.000Oe- 4.2000e- i 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; i 0.5470 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.5503 ore w/o Drive 005 004 004005 005 005 Electricity ;i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Office Park i 1.193e i 6.4300e- 0.0585 0.0491 i 3.5000e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- ; 63.6630 1.2200e- .............................. M...................j......................................�................... t......................................'................ +006 003 ............. .............. .................t.................. i......................................i..................................................... Electricity ;I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0495 3.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 003 004 003 003 003 003 ..................M.........................................................�................. ...�....................... .....Unmitigated ............. ............. .............. .............. ............... .. } .....I......................................�...................... .............. ............. ............. NaturalGas ;I 6.4900e- i 0.0590 0.0496 , 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- ! i 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 1 64.6008 Mitigated ;I 003 i . I 004 , 003 . 003 003 003 003 i 003 1 ! ..............................! NaturalGas ; 6.4900e- i 0.0590 0.0496 i 3.5000e- E 4.4800e- E 4.4800e- E E 4.4800e- i 4.4800e- ; E 64.2100 E 1.2300e- ............. E 1.1800e- i 64.6008 Unmitigated ; 003 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 10250 i 6.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 4.2000e- i 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; i 0.5470 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.5503 ore w/o Drive 005 004 004005 005 005 005 ; 005 005 TL .. ! Office Park i 1.193e i 6.4300e- 0.0585 0.0491 i 3.5000e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- ; 63.6630 1.2200e- 1.1700e- 64.0505 +006 003 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 003 Total 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0495 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use Pharmacy/Drugst 64000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I PM10 PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 0.0000 I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst i 10250 6.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 4.2000e- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- I 4.000Oe- I 4.000Oe- 0.5470 1.000Oe- I 1.000Oe- I 0.5503 ore w/o Drive 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 005 ,................... ........... it" ::........... f..................i...................1................... ................... I................... ................... i ...................................... j.. ................ i ....................................... yi ...................................... .......,................... ............... Office Park 1.193e :I 6.4300e- 0.0585 0.0491 3.5000e- 4.4400e- 14.4400e- I 4.4400e- I 4.4400e- 63.6630 1.2200e- I 1.1700e- 64.0505 +006 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 Total 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0495 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kW h/yr MT/yr Office Park i 1.717e ;i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 +006 .; .......................................�................. Pharmacy/Drugst 64000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ore w/o Drive TN. Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Exhaust I PM10 Use Fugitive PM2.5 I I Land Use kW h/yr MT/yr Office Park i 1.717e 3i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 +006 .............................. . ................. .......................... ..... ...... ................... ................... Pharmacy/Drugst i 64000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ore w/o Drive Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust I PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.5012 i 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- I 0000e 0.0000 2.7500e- ' 005 003 003 005 003 .............................. ....... ....... ............... ................... ................... ....................................... ................... ..................... .................. ! ............ ........... .. .............. .............. Unmitigated 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- ; 005 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ; 0.1217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..................................................:...................:...................:..................•;...................;..................•;...................;...................;...................;....................' �:. ..... ..... ° ;................... Consumer 0.3794 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products S .....................................................................................................................................1................... ...:... ..:.................... ..:... 0.0000 Landscaping ; 1.3000e- 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- �i 004 005 003 003 005 003 Total 0.5012 1.0000e- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 2.7500e- 2.6100e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 2.7500e- 003 005 r 003 005 003 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 005 11.0000e- 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ; 0.1217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating............. . �:. ..... ..... .. ............. .....................................................I' ...................:..................... ..................�.... ;... �.... ............ ............ ............. *1 �.... �.... ............. Consumer ; 0.3794 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ;i ................................................ r ..................... .............. ............ r Landscaping ;; 1.3000e- i 1.0000e- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ; 2.6100e- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- ; 004 005 r 003 003 005 r 003 Total 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 11.0000e- 0.0000 2.7500e- 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 28 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM .1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated ; 5.7504 i 0.5906 1 0.0140 22.4767 .: Unmitigated ;1 5.7504 ` 0.5906 i 0.0140 i 22.4767 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Office Park i 17.7734 / i 5.6387 i 0.5792 1 0.0137 22.0400 10.8934 .......................................... ................... :.................. :................... Pharmacy/Drugst 10.352238 / 1 0.1118 i 0.0115 1 2.7000e- 0.4368 ore w/o Drive TN. 1 0.215888: 004 Total 5.7504 0.5906 1 0.0139 22.4767 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 29 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr door Use , ..........................I:. ............. ............. ................i............... I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Office Park i 17.7734/ Ei 5.6387 i 0.5792 i 0.0137 i 22.0400 10.8934 Pharmacy/Drugst 10.352238 / V 0.1118 i 0.0115 i 2.7000e- i 0.4368 ore w/o Drive 10.215888E 004 TM. Total 5.7504 0.5906 0.0139 22.4767 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated ; 21.9291 i 1.2960 i 0.0000 49.1446 , ..........................I:. ............. ............. ................i............... Unmitigated ; 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 '• 49.1446 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 30 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I I Land Use tons MT/yr Office Park : 93 i 18.8782 1 1.1157 0.0000 i 42.3072 .............................. .................. .................... I ................... ....................................... Pharmacy/Drugst i 15.03 3.0510 1 0.1803 0.0000 i 6.8374 ore w/o Drive Total 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 49.1446 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I I Land Use tons MT/yr Office Park 93 i 18.8782 1 1.1157 0.0000 42.3072 .............................. .................. ........... ................ ................... Pharmacy/Drugst 15.03 99:: 3.0510 0.1803 0.0000 6.8374 ore w/o Drive Total 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 49.1446 9.0 Operational Offroad IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 31 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 1:25 PM 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 27 Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 100.00 1000sgft 2.30 100,000.00 0 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru ; 5.00 ; 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Architectural Coating - From PD, following SCAQMD guide for interior/exterior areas Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2019 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ; ConstArea_Nonresidentlal_Exterior 52,500.00 26,250.00 i........................................................................... .. ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 157,500.00 78,750.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF—Residential—Exterior 100.00 0.00 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential _Interior 50.00 0.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 i.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 264.00 i..............................................................................;...............................................................................:...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 i.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00 i........................................................................... .... ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 5.00 .. i.............................................................................I........................................................................... ... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseEndDate ; 12/20/2018 1/4/2019 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/19/2019 1/21/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/16/2017 1/2/2018 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/2/2017 12/4/2017 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;.................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 11/25/2017 11/27/2017 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblGrading AcresOfGrading 5.00 3.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblGrading ; AcresOfGrading 7.50 4.50 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..............................................................................:...................................................................... tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear ; 2014 2019 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8399 E 28.6607 E 22.4351 0.0295 E 6.4520 1.6245 E 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 E 4.8057 : ; 2,920.4890; 0.7519 E 0.0000 12,936.2798 1 1.6245 8.0079 .: 4.8057 2018 i i : 3.137021.9316 18.9964 0.0334 0.4863 1.2744 1.7607 0.1311 1.2207 1.3517 :3,050.2011: 0.5183 0.0000 3,061.0852 ...........................la.................................. i i 1. .............. 777 .............. ......................................1-------------...... ............................................................................ I..... I ..................;................... j------------.......�...................�.... ........... ..............i..............E .............e ...... ............. .............. ... .............. ............. .......................... 2019 1.1914 243.6258 20.0444 5932 3,011.6126 0.5415 0.0000 3,022.9840 1 1.2744 1.7607 ii 1.3517 ; E 3,050.2011E 0.5183 r 0.0000 3,061.0852 Total 249.6027 70.6367 59.7652 0.0962 7.4247 4.0057 11.3618 3.6363 3.8000 7.3488 1 18,982.3027 1.8117 1 0.0000 9,020.3490 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8399 E 28.6607 II 22.4351 1 0.0295 6.4520 1 1.6245 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 4.8057 „ 2,920.4890 i 0.7519 ° 0.0000 2,936.2798 ...........................la.................................. i i 1. .............. 777 .............. ......................................1-------------...... ............................................................................ ..................;................... j------------.......�...................�.... ............. ............. 2018 3.1370 E 21.9316 r 18.9964 I 0.0334 0.4863 1 1.2744 1.7607 1 0.1311 1.2207 1.3517 ; E 3,050.2011E 0.5183 r 0.0000 3,061.0852 ............................... r �............... ;................. l................... j................... .................*..................:................. r ; ..................1......................................................... 2019 ; 243.6258 i 20.0444 r r r 18.3336 0.0334 0.4863 1.1068 1.5932 0.1311 1.0603 1.1914 3,011.6126: 0.5415 r r r 0.0000 3,022.9840 Total 249.6027 70.6367 59.7652 0.0962 7.4247 4.0057 11.3618 3.6363 3.8000 7.3488 8,982.3027 1.8117 0.0000 9,020.3489 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM ROG NO CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 1.00OOe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 0.0230 6.00OOe- 0.0243 0.0000 i 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 004 005 1 005 005 005 005 ..................................................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.................... 0.0243 ,................... ;................... ....................................... Energy .� 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 � 387.8324 i 7.4300e- � 7.1100e- 390.1927 005 r 003 003 003 .............................. .. �... ...`... ...'... .. �... ...................'................... I................... I...................'................. ............. .............. ............. ...............................+.................. i......................................'......................................................... Mobile ;i 4.6325 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 0.1790 2.7153 11,431.720 0.4042 11,440.207 . ...................*...................................... ,i 0 3 Energy ; 0.0356 0.3232 1 0.2715 Total 7.4148 12.5187 49.9008 0.1448 9.4919 0.2187 9.7107 2.5363 0.2036 2.7399 ; 003 003 11,819.575 0.4116 7.1100e- 11,830.424 __ _ _ r Mobile ; 4.6325 i 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 1 0.1790 2.7153 ; 11,431.7201 0.4042 4 003 3 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 1.00OOe- 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- ; 0.0230 6.00OOe- i 0.0243 004 1 005 005 005........................; 005 005 005 �: ....................:.....................................: ..................................... .............. .................. . ...................*...................................... .............. ........................ ................... ................... Energy ; 0.0356 0.3232 1 0.2715 i 1.9400e- t S0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 ; i 387.8324 1 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 ; 003 003 r __ _ _ r Mobile ; 4.6325 i 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 1 0.1790 2.7153 ; 11,431.7201 0.4042 11,440.207 r r r 0 r 3 Total 7.4148 12.5187 49.90080.1448 9.4919 0.2187 9.7107 2.5363 0.2036 2.7399 0.4116 7.1100e- 11,830.424 111,819.575 4 003 3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NB10-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5i 5: 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name I Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition :Demolition ;10/2/2017 :11/24/2017 5 40 ....................................................................I ........................................................... 2 Site Preparation }Site Preparation ;11/27/2017 :12/1/2017 . 5: 5 ; ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. .............................................................. 3 :Grading :Grading :12/4/2017 :12/15/2017 5 10 ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- ................ .............................................................. 4 ;Building Construction :Building Construction ;1/2/2018 ::1/4/2019 5 264 .................................................................................................................................... ........................... ........................... .. .... ....... ...... 5 'Paving : Paving :1/7/2019 :1/18/2019 .... ....................................... ' 5: 10 .............................................................. ............................................................................... — — 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5i 5: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 78,750; Non -Residential Outdoor: 26,250 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition ;Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.001 811 0.73 ........................................................................... ............................. ............................... ......................................... ............................................... .................................... ..................................... Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 : 8.00:: 255:: 0.40 .................................................................................................................................... Demolition ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ............................................................................... 3: .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Site Preparation .Graders1...................................................................... ; r ............................................ .................................. .................................... 8.00:: 1741: ..................................... 0.41 .......................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... Scrapers . ............................................................................. 1 .................................... 8.001 3611 ..................................... 0.48 ........................................................................... Site Preparation ......................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 7.001 971 0.37 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... ;Graders ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.00:: 174:: ..................................... 0.41 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... i Rubber Tired Dozers . ........................................................................ 1 .................................... 8.00 255 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Grading ......................................................... . ... iTractors/Loaders/Backhoes i . .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 7.001 971 0.37 .......................................................................... Building Construction i ..................................................................... Cranes . .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 8.00 2261 0.29 .......................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................................................................ .................................... ..................................... Building Construction Forklifts 2:: 7.00:: 891 0.20 .................................................................................................................................................. Building Construction :Generator Sets r ............................................................................... .................................... 8.00:: 84:: 1 ..................................... 0.74 .......................................................................... Building Construction ...................................................................... . ............................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 .................................... 6.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Building Construction ......................................... ............................. ;Welders . ..................................... ............................................................................................................. 3 8.00 46: 0.45 ........................................................................... Paving ................................................................. ;Cement and Mortar Mixers ............................................................................... .................................... 8.001: 9: ..................................... 0.56 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Pavers ............................................................................... 1 .......................................................................... 8.001 1251 0.42 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Paving Equipment ......................................................................... ................................... 8.00 130:: 0.36 ................................................................................................................................................. Paving Rollers 4 .................................................................................................................... A 8.001 801 ..................................... 0.38 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . ......................................................................... i 11 .................................... 8.001 97:: 0.37 .......................................................................... Architectural Coating ...................................................................... Air Compressors .................................. .................................... 6.00: 78:: ..................................... 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 51 13.00; 0.00; 172.00'• 14.70: 6.90; 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ........................ Site Preparation 3 8.00; 0.00': ........................... 0.00: .............................. 14.70; 6.90: -� 20.00; LD Mix ' HDT_Mix HHDT ...................................................--------------------------------r---------------------------............................ Grading 4i 10.00; ;..........................�---------------------..............................-------------------------r----...................................................................................... 0.00: 0.00; 14.70; 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix :HDTMix HHDT ........................ Building Construction 8 r 34.00 ;.......................... 17.001 0.00 .. 14.70 ........................ :.. ... 6.90: . 20.00 LID Mix ..,. HDT_Mix ... HHDT ........................... Paving 6 ....................................................... 15.00 0.001 . 0.00; 14.70 6.90; -------------------------- 20.00 LID Mix "HDT_Mix '...... ,............ HHDT .............................................................................. .................................. ---------- ...................... -------------------------- Architectural Coating 1: 7.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: ...................... 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix ...................... ; HDT_Mix ..................... : HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.9323 1 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 1 0.1412 0.0000 0.0000 .: . Off -Road ,. 2.7216 i 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i I 1.6062 I 1.6062 i i 1.5022 : 1.5022 2,457.4682: 0.6235 : 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 17777.6-235 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0695 1.0804 0.7995 3.1700e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0920 0.0205 0.0157 0.0363 314.3095 1 2.2200e- i 314.3562 003 003 ..............................i .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i : ; 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 j I I i EE W orker fl 0.0488 0.0613 0.7644 1.8400e- i 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 148.7114 7.3200e- 148.8651 003 003 003 003 Total 0.1183 1.1417 1.5639 5.0100e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2385 0.0591 0.0168 0.0759 463.0208 9.5400e- 463.2212 003 1 1 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9323 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 0.1412 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; : ; i I.. ...................:............................................................................. ...............:.....................................:.......................................i..................:...................• Off -Road ; 2.7216 1 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i 1 1.6062 1 1.6062 1 1 1.5022 1.5022 ; I 2,457.46821 0.6235 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 j 12,457.46821 0.6235 1 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0695 1.0804 0.7995 3.1700e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0920 0.0205 0.0157 0.0363 314.3095 i 2.2200e- i 314.3562 V 003 003 ..............................� .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i : ; 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 .............................. I I `......................................'....................+.................. i EE a...................`...................'...................`...................1................... Worker «...................'.........................................................;...................'...................'................... �? 0.0488 0.0613 0.7644 1.8400e- i 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 148.7114 7.3200e- 148.8651 003 003 003 003 Total 0.1183 1.1417 1.5639 5.0100e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2385 0.0591 0.0168 0.0759 463.0208 9.5400e- 463.2212 003 1 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 I 1.3967 1.3967 I 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 ..'... ..'... ...'... ...'... 0.7474 W orker ,; 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- i 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 004 ii 003 Total 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 i 1.3967 1.3967 i 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 ..'... ..'... ...'... ...'... 0.6448 W orker ,; 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- i 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 004 ii 003 Total 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 1 004 003 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; ° 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Off -Road ; 2.6973 I 28.1608 i 18.9679 I 0.0206 i i 1.5550 i 1.5550 i I 1.4306 I 1.4306 ; i2,104.5737i 0.6448 i 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................,;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 i i E 1.4306 .............................. ...............I ............. ............. ............. .............. .............. 0.6448 W orker �? 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- i 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 0.0000 ...1 .................. .... ;....;.... Off -Road 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 1 5550 ° 1 5550 1 4306 14306 2,104.57371 0.6448 i �, 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 i i E 1 1.1992 .............................. ...............I ............. ............. ............. .............. .............. W orker �? 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- i 0.1118 9.00OOe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 2,327.6664 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- 0.1118 9.00OOe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 003 004 004 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; � � i 2,317.2089; 0.4980 i 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1216 1.2261 1.5168 3.6900e- 0.1063 0.0203 0.1266 0.0303 0.0187 0.0490 358.5267 i 2.5400e- 0.0249 003 003 1.2511 «.....................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r..............................I................ ...[358.5801 ................. W orker ,; 0.1151 0.1454 1.8159 4.8100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 374.4655 0.0178 374.8387 2,317.2089 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,327.6664 Total 0.2367 1.3716 3.3327 8.5000e- 0.4863 0.0233 0.5096 0.1311 0.0214 0.1525 732.9923 0.0203 733.4188 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; � � i 2,317.2089; 0.4980 i 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1216 1.2261 1.5168 3.6900e- 0.1063 0.0203 0.1266 0.0303 0.0187 0.0490 358.5267 i 2.5400e- 0.0249 003 003 1.0846 «.....................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r..............................I................ ...[358.5801 ................. W orker ,; 0.1151 0.1454 1.8159 4.8100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 374.4655 0.0178 374.8387 1 2,299.7816 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,309.8005 Total 0.2367 1.3716 3.3327 8.5000e- 0.4863 0.0233 0.5096 0.1311 0.0214 0.1525 732.9923 0.0203 733.4188 003 1 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1152 1.1308 1.4598 3.6700e- 0.1063 0.0193 0.1256 0.0303 0.0177 0.0480 351.5617 i 2.4900e- 0.0249 003 003 1.0846 «......................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... I................ ...[351.6140 r............................................... W orker 0.1059 0.1334 1.6689 4.8000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 360.2693 0.0166 360.6186 1 2,299.7816 003 003 003 2,309.8005 Total 0.2211 1.2642 3.1288 8.4700e- 0.4863 0.0222 0.5085 0.1311 0.0205 0.1515 711.8310 0.0191 712.2326 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1152 1.1308 1.4598 3.6700e- 0.1063 0.0193 0.1256 0.0303 0.0177 0.0480 351.5617 i 2.4900e- 0.0176 003 003 0.7225 «......................................,......................................,...................1.........................................................°...................1....................+..................:.........................................................1...................[351.6140 r............................................... W orker 0.1059 0.1334 1.6689 4.8000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 360.2693 0.0166 360.6186 1 003 003 003 Total 0.2211 1.2642 3.1288 8.4700e- 0.4863 0.0222 0.5085 0.1311 0.0205 0.1515 711.8310 0.0191 712.2326 003 1 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road :i 1.2310 i 12.4141 i 11.7009 0.0176 0.72250.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 ; 11,722.2285I' 0.5342 + 1,733.4458 ................... ................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................... i..................;...................-..................{...................�................. ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;.................... ; ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0176 0.7225 ..............................«......................................;......................................;................. �;.............. .............+..................:............................................................................�................... 0.6658 Worker ,; 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 l 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 1 003 003 I 003 ii 003 Total 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road :i 1.2310 i 12.4141 i 11.7009 0.0176 0.72250.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 ; 11,722.2285I' 0.5342 + 1,733.4458 ................... ..............................'. ........................................................................................................................................................................... i..................;...................-..................{...................�................. ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;.................... ; ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 E 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 E 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- ..............................«......................................;......................................;................. �;.............. .............+..................:............................................................................�................... 0.1288 Worker ,; 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- E 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 l 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 281.4481 003 003 I 003 ii 003 281.9473 Total 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 243.3375 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ...........................................................................a...................a......................................a......................................i..................:.....................................a................. �. ..... ..... ... Off -Road ; 0.2664 1 1.8354 1.8413 E 2.9700e- 1 0.1288 0.1288 1 0.1288 0.1288 ; E 281.4481E 0.0238 281.9473 ;E 003 ; .E Total 243.6039 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... E ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- E `................... ............................................................................................................................................................................ '....................+......................................'...................'................... «.: , ................... W orker ; 0.0218 0.0275 i 0.3436 9.9000e- i 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 281.9473 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 003 Total 0.0218 0.0275 0.3436 9.9000e- 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 004 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 243.3375 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .'...........................................................................a...................a......................................a......................................i..................:.....................................a................. �. ..... ..... ... Off -Road ; 0.2664 1 1.8354 1.8413 E 2.9700e- 1 0.1288 0.1288 1 0.1288 0.1288 ; E 281.4481E 0.0238 281.9473 ;E 003 ; .E Total 243.6039 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 ; Mitigated ;i 4.6325 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 0.1790 2.7153 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. ■: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3 .: i `................... ............................................................................................................................................................................ '....................+......................................'...................'................... «.: , ................... W orker ; 0.0218 0.0275 i 0.3436 9.9000e- i 0.0782 6.00OOe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 9.6861 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 2.7153 ; :11,431.720; 0.4042 Total 0.0218 0.0275 0.3436 9.9000e- 0.0782 6.00OOe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 004 004 1 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day ; Mitigated ;i 4.6325 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 0.1790 2.7153 11,431.720: 0.4042 111,440.207 , 0 3 .: Unmitigated ; 4.6325 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 0.1790 2.7153 ; :11,431.720; 0.4042 1 :11,440.207 ■E ■ 0 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW . 1,142.00 i......._164.00 76.00 ; 2,871,853 ; 2,871,853 ..................Office .Park .......................................................;. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru i. 450.30 450.30 450.30 ............................................................................................................ 616,260 616,260 Total 1,592.30 614.30 526.30 3,488,113 3,488,113 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by W Office Park I 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.0048.00 3 119.00 ; 82 ; 15 ; 3 ..............................:................................................................................. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 .......................... ............................................................ 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category s Use Ib/day PM10 Ib/day Total NaturalGas ;1 0.0356 1 0.3232 1 0.2715 1.9400e- i 0.0246 1 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 1 387.8324E 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 Mitigated ;1 003 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day 1 003 003 r........................................ ore w/o Drive1 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 005 +� i E E E TL.... �; ` ; `.........................................................1........................................R...................................... '...................`...................................... ..............................1.................r......................................1...................'...................` ..................1................... Office Park 1 3268.49 :I 0.0353 ; 0.3204 ; 0.2692 1 1.9200e- 0.0244 i 0.0244 I I 0.0244 i 0.0244 ; 1384.5286 , 7.3700e- , 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 ; 003 003 .............................. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ....................................... ................................. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. `. NaturalGas ; 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 E 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 E 0.0246 0.0246 ; E 387.8324E 7.4300e- E 7.1100e- E 390.1927 Unmitigated ;E 387.8324 003 7.1100e- 390.1927 ; 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst 28.0822 3E 3.000Oe- E 2.7500e- E 2.3100e- E 2.000Oe- E 1 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- 1 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- ; 1 3.3038 6.000Oe- E 6.000Oe- 3.3239 ore w/o Drive1 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 005 +� i E E E TL.... �; ` ; `.........................................................1........................................R...................................... '...................`...................................... ..............................1.................r......................................1...................'...................` ..................1................... Office Park 1 3268.49 :I 0.0353 ; 0.3204 ; 0.2692 1 1.9200e- 0.0244 i 0.0244 I I 0.0244 i 0.0244 ; 1384.5286 , 7.3700e- , 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 ; 003 003 Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 7767 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- I ; Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst i 0.0280822:: 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- 3.3038 6.000Oe- I 6.000Oe- 1 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 TM... : 1i ...................• i i i i i ............................f.................................................................................................................. ................... j................... ................... .................... ;...............................................................................;................... •................... Office Park i 3.26849 41 0.0353 i 0.3204 0.2692 1.9200e- i i 0.0244 I 0.0244 i i 0.0244 i 0.0244 , 1384.5286 1 7.3700e- i 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 003 003 .... Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 ........... 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 003 004 005 005 003 003 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.7467 i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- 0.0243 ; 004 005 I 1............... 005 005 005 i 005 .... .............. .............. ...... --- I.................1............... -----------------i............... .............. ........... Unmitigated ; 2.7467 1.000Oe- '• 0.0108 0.0000 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 ; 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 0.0000 .............................. :...................:...................:...................:...................:................... :................... :................... :................... :................... :..................... F ................... ................... j................... ................... ................... ;................... Consumer ; 2.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products.............. ..............i:................... ..............:...................°...................I...................I... I.. ;..... I.. .......... .............. ............... ... .. .............. .............. .............;................... Landscaping ;i 1.0300e- 1.00001- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00001- 4.00001- 4.00001- , 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 1 0.0243 Consumer .i 003 004 005 005 005 1 005 005 t Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 ; 4.00001- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.00001- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 005 005 005 005 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Coating........... �.... �.... ..............i:................... .........................................................;....................... ............. ;... ...�.... .. .. ...... * .............. -- ....... ....................................... ............. Consumer ; 2.0790 1 I I i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r r Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 ; 0.0230 i 6.000Oe- 0.0243 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 ; r 005 Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:28 PM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 27 Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 100.00 1000sgft 2.30 100,000.00 0 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru ; 5.00 ; 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Architectural Coating - From PD, following SCAQMD guide for interior/exterior areas Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2019 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ; ConstArea_Nonresidentlal_Exterior 52,500.00 26,250.00 i........................................................................... .. ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 157,500.00 78,750.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF—Residential—Exterior 100.00 0.00 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential _Interior 50.00 0.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 i.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 264.00 i..............................................................................;...............................................................................:...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 i.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00 i........................................................................... .... ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 5.00 .. i.............................................................................I........................................................................... ... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseEndDate ; 12/20/2018 1/4/2019 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/19/2019 1/21/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/16/2017 1/2/2018 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/2/2017 12/4/2017 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;.................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 11/25/2017 11/27/2017 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblGrading AcresOfGrading 5.00 3.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblGrading ; AcresOfGrading 7.50 4.50 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..............................................................................:...................................................................... tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear ; 2014 2019 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8444 i 28.6644 22.4954 0.0294 i 6.4520 1.6245 i 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 i 4.8057 : ; ; : ; : 2,910.50161 0.7519 i 0.0000 12,926.2924 .............................. .: ................................................................................................................................................. :................... :.................... ............... ,...................;................... ;....................................... 2018 i ; : 3.1497 21.9753 19.1758 0.0331 0.4863 1.2746 1.7609 0.1311 1.2208 1.3519 : i 13 023.8672 0.5184 0.0000 3 034.7530 2018 ; 3.1497 i 21.9753 19.1758 I 0.0331 0.4863 1.2746 1.7609 0.1311 1.2208 r 1.3519 I................... I................ �... �... �... i.............................. `.................................. .............................. j ..'... .. ...`... .. ...'... .. �i...................'................... .............. ............. .............. ............. ...............................+.................. .........'................... 2019 ,i 243.6261 20.0839 I 18.5175 0.0330 0.4863 1.1070 1.5934 0.1311 1.0605 1.1915 2,986.1525 0.5415 0.0000 12,997.5239 243.6261 18.51 ; i 20.0839 75 0.0330 0.4863 1.1070 1.5934 1 0.1311 1.0605 .: ii 2,986.1525: 0.5415 0.0000 r 2,997.5239 Total 249.6202 70.7235 Total 249.6202 70.7235 60.1888 0.0955 1 7.4247 4.0061 11.3622 3.6363 3.8004 7.3491 0.0000 8,920.5213 1.8118 1 0.0000 8,958.5693 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8444 i 28.6644 22.4954 1 0.02946.4520 1.6245 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 4.8057 2,910.5016 0.7519 i 0.0000 2,926.2924 ..............................° ?................... ......................................---------.................................................................................. ° ...................;........................................................ 2018 ; 3.1497 i 21.9753 19.1758 I 0.0331 0.4863 1.2746 1.7609 0.1311 1.2208 r 1.3519 ; 13,023.8672; 0.5184 0.0000 r 3,034.7530 r r ' ..... r r 2019 243.6261 18.51 ; i 20.0839 75 0.0330 0.4863 1.1070 1.5934 1 0.1311 1.0605 .: 1.1915 2,986.1525: 0.5415 0.0000 r 2,997.5239 Total 249.6202 70.7235 60.1888 0.0955 7.4247 4.0067-'[7 3.6363 3.8004 7.3491 1 8,920.5213 1.8118 0.0000 8,958.5693 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM ROG NO CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 1.00OOe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- I 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 0.0230 6.00OOe- 0.0243 4.00OOe- 004 005 005 005 005 005 ..................................................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.................... .: ,....................................... ;................... ;............... .... Energy .� 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 : 387.8324 i 7.4300e- � 7.1100e- 390.1927 005 r 003 003 003 .............................. .. ...`... .. �... ...'... .. �... i.................. .'................... I..... .............. ................... '................. ............. .............. ............. ...............................+..................i......................................'..................................................... Mobile ;i 4.7806 12.7941 49.4611 0.1357 9.4919 0.1949 9.6869 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 10,888.054 0.4046 1 10,896.551 Energy ii 6 t 9 0.0246 0.0246 ; i 387.8324 1 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- Total 7.5629 13.1174 49.7434 0.1376 9.4919 0.2195 9.7115 2.5363 0.2043 2.7406 ..... 2.5363 0.1797 11,275.909 0.4121 7.1100e- 11,286.768 r r r 6 r 9 Total 7.5629 13.1174 49.7434 0.1376 9.4919 9 9.7115 003 9 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 I 1.00OOe- I 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- ; 0.0230 6.00OOe- i 0.0243 004 I I 005 005 005 005 005 1 1 .............. .................... *...................................... ......................................................... Energy ; 0.0356 0.3232 1 0.2715 i 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 ; i 387.8324 1 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 ' ; 003 003 ; .................................................. Mobile r ; 4.7806 i 12.7941 ........ • ....;................... ............ 49.4611 0.1357 i 9.4919 0.1949 i 9.6869 ..... 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 r ' , 10,888.054; 0.4046 10,896.551 r r r 6 r 9 Total 7.5629 13.1174 49.7434 0.1376 9.4919 0.2195 9.7115 2.5363 0.2043 2.7406 7.1100e- 1777.4121 003 9 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NB10-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5i 5: 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name I Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition :Demolition ;10/2/2017 :11/24/2017 5 40 ....................................................................I ........................................................... 2 Site Preparation }Site Preparation ;11/27/2017 :12/1/2017 . 5: 5 ; ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. .............................................................. 3 :Grading :Grading :12/4/2017 :12/15/2017 5 10 ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- ................ .............................................................. 4 ;Building Construction :Building Construction ;1/2/2018 ::1/4/2019 5 264 ...................................................................................................................................' ........................... ........................... 5 :Paving :Paving :1/7/2019 ::1/18/2019 ...................T.' ----------------- 5: 10 .............................................................. ............................................................................... — — 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5i 5: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 78,750; Non -Residential Outdoor: 26,250 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition ;Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.001 811 0.73 ........................................................................... ......................................... ............................................... ............................. ............................... .................................... ..................................... Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 : 8.00:: 255:: 0.40 .................................................................................................................................... Demolition ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ............................................................................... 3: .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Site Preparation .Graders1...................................................................... ; r ............................................ .................................. .................................... 8.00:: 1741: ..................................... 0.41 .......................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... Scrapers . ............................................................................. 1 .................................... 8.001 3611 ..................................... 0.48 ........................................................................... Site Preparation ......................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 7.001 971 0.37 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... ;Graders ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.00:: 174:: ..................................... 0.41 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... i Rubber Tired Dozers . ........................................................................ 1 .................................... 8.00 255 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Grading ......................................................... . ... iTractors/Loaders/Backhoes i . .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 7.001 971 0.37 .......................................................................... Building Construction i ..................................................................... Cranes . .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 8.00 2261 0.29 .......................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................................................................ .................................... ..................................... Building Construction Forklifts 2:: 7.00:: 891 0.20 .................................................................................................................................................. Building Construction :Generator Sets r ............................................................................... .................................... 8.00:: 84:: 1 ..................................... 0.74 .......................................................................... Building Construction ...................................................................... . ............................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 .................................... 6.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Building Construction ......................................... ............................. ;Welders . ..................................... ............................................................................................................. 3 8.00 46: 0.45 ........................................................................... Paving ................................................................. ;Cement and Mortar Mixers ............................................................................... .................................... 8.001: 9: ..................................... 0.56 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Pavers ............................................................................... 1 .......................................................................... 8.001 1251 0.42 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... ;Paving Equipment . ......................................................................... ................................... 8.00: 130:: 0.36 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Rollers ............................................................................... 2:: .................................... 8.001: 80:: ..................................... 0.38 ........................................................................... Paving P ....................................................................... Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . ........................................................................ 1 ................................... .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 .......................................................................... Architectural Coating ...................................................................... 'Air Compressors .................................... 6.00: 78:: ..................................... 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 51 13.00; 0.00; 172.00'• 14.70: 6.90; 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ........................ Site Preparation 3 8.00; 0.00': ........................... 0.00: .............................. 14.70; 6.90: -� 20.00; LD Mix ' HDT_Mix HHDT ...................................................--------------------------------r---------------------------............................ Grading 4i 10.00; ;..........................�---------------------..............................-------------------------r----...................................................................................... 0.00: 0.00; 14.70; 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix :HDTMix HHDT ........................ Building Construction 8 r 34.00 ;.......................... 17.001 0.00 .. 14.70 ........................ :.. ... 6.90: . 20.00 LID Mix ..,. HDT_Mix ... HHDT ........................... Paving 6 ....................................................... 15.00 0.001 . 0.00; 14.70 6.90; -------------------------- 20.00 LID Mix "HDT_Mix '...... ,............ HHDT .............................................................................. .................................. ---------- ...................... -------------------------- Architectural Coating 1: 7.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: ...................... 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix ...................... ; HDT_Mix ..................... : HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.9323 1 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 1 0.1412 0.0000 0.0000 .: . Off -Road ,. 2.7216 i 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i I 1.6062 I 1.6062 i i 1.5022 : 1.5022 2,457.4682: 0.6235 : 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 17777.6-235 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0731 1.1195 0.9225 3.1600e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0921 0.0205 0.0158 0.0363 313.5615 1 2.2500e- i 313.6088 003 003 ..............................i .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ..............................«---------------- : ; 1 �;...................,...................................... :................... ................... --....................................... ;.................. ................... ...................°......................................1................... W orker ;................... ,; 0.0497 0.0673 0.7017 1.7200e- 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 139.4719 7.3200e- 139.6256 1 '1 003 003 003 ii 003 Total 0.1229 1.1868 1.6242 4.8800e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2386 0.0591 0.0169 0.0759 453.0334 9.5700e- 453.2345 003 1 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9323 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 0.1412 ; 0.0000 ; I 0.0000 �: ; : ; i Off -Road ; 2.72161 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i 1 1.6062 1 1.6062 1 1 1.5022 1.5022 ; i 2,457.46821 0.6235 2,470 5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 12,457.46821 0.6235 1 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0731 1.1195 0.9225 3.1600e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0921 0.0205 0.0158 0.0363 313.5615 i 2.2500e- i 313.6088 V 003 003 ..............................� .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ..............................«------------------....................,......................................;...................:...................................... : ; i �; --....................................... ;....................................... ...................°......................................1................... Worker ,; 0.0497 0.0673 0.7017 1.7200e- 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 139.4719 7.3200e- 139.6256 '1 003 003 003 ii 003 Total 0.1229 1.1868 1.6242 4.8800e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2386 0.0591 0.0169 0.0759 453.0334 9.5700e- 453.2345 003 1 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 I 1.3967 1.3967 I 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0238 0.9545 ; 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 .............................. ..........................................................+...................................... ... •.. .................................. ...« , W orker . 0.0306 00414 i 0.4318 0.0894 7.2000e- 00901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85. 450e- 85.9235 004 004 ii 003003 Total 0.0306 0.0414 0.4318 1.0600e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85.8289 4.5000e- 85.9235 003 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 0.1031 0.0000 0.1031 ; 0.0000 0.0000 �: ; ; ......................................................... .............. ..... ..... ..................................... Off -Road ; 2.5289 i 28.6230 i 17.1310 I 0.0238 1.3967 1.3967 1.2850 1 1.2850 ; ;2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0206 6.3402 ; 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 .............................. ..........................................................+...................................... ... •.. .................................. ...« , W orker . 0.0306 00414 i 0.4318 0.0894 7.2000e- 00901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85. 450e- 85.9235 004 004 ii 003003 Total 0.0306 0.0414 0.4318 1.0600e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85.8289 4.5000e- 85.9235 003 004 1 004 003 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; ° 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Off -Road ; 2.6973 I 28.1608 i 18.9679 I 0.0206 i i 1.5550 i 1.5550 i I 1.4306 I 1.4306 ; i2,104.5737i 0.6448 i 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; i .............................. .: ..................,;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 �' I I :.. 1.4306 4.7752 ..'. ..................... ....................:... .... ..... ...... ,..................:...................:............................................................................ ............... .............. 0.6448 W orker �? 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- i 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; ° 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Off -Road ; 2.6973 I 28.1608 i 18.9679 I 0.0206 i i 1.5550 i 1.5550 i I 1.4306 I 1.4306 ; i2,104.5737i 0.6448 i 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; i .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... i ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2511 1.2511 �' I I :...................................... ............... .............. -------------------'. ..................... . ,...................I... ..:.....,...................................... ................... ................... W orker �? 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- i 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 004 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; i 2,317.2089: 0.4980 i � � 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 1 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... : ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... : Vendor �� 0.1324 1.2557 1.8514 3.6600e- 0.1063 0.0205 0.1268 0.0303 0.0189 0.0491 r 355.5062 2.6200e- 355.5612 : 003 r : 003 .............................. �: i «......................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r I................... .... ............... W orker ,; 0.1169 0.1596 1.6607 4.5100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 351.1522 0.0178 351.5253 '1 003 003 003 ii Total 0.2494 1.4152 3.5121 8.1700e- 0.4863 0.0235 0.5098 0.1311 0.0216 0.1527 706.6583 0.0204 707.0866 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; i 2,317.2089: 0.4980 i � � 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 1 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... : ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... : Vendor �� 0.1324 1.2557 1.8514 3.6600e- 0.1063 0.0205 0.1268 0.0303 0.0189 0.0491 r 355.5062 2.6200e- 355.5612 0.0249 : 003 r : 003 .............................. �: i «......................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r I................... .... ............... W orker ,; 0.1169 0.1596 1.6607 4.5100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 351.1522 0.0178 351.5253 1 2,299.7816 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,309.8005 Total 0.2494 1.4152 3.5121 8.1700e- 0.4863 0.0235 0.5098 0.1311 0.0216 0.1527 706.6583 0.0204 707.0866 003 1 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : : : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,299.7816 0.4771 .: : : : Vendor �� 0.1252 1.1574 1.7906 3.6500e- 0.1063 0.0195 0.1258 0.0303 0.0179 0.0482 r 348.5863 2.5700e- 348.6404 0.0249 : : 003 r : 003 1.0846 �: i ...................°...................I....................+..................:.........................................................I...................................... .................................................................................................I...................................... r W orker ,; 0.1075 0.1463 1.5221 4.5000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 337.7846 0.0166 338.1339 1 2,299.7816 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,309.8005 Total 0.2327 1.3037 3.3127 8.1500e- 0.4863 0.0224 0.5087 0.1311 0.0206 0.1517 686.3710 0.0192 686.7743 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : : : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: : : : Vendor �� 0.1252 1.1574 1.7906 3.6500e- 0.1063 0.0195 0.1258 0.0303 0.0179 0.0482 r 348.5863 2.5700e- 348.6404 0.0176 : : 003 r : 003 0.7225 �: i ...................°...................1....................+..................:.........................................................1...................................... ............................................................................. .................... 1................... ................... r W orker ,; 0.1075 0.1463 1.5221 4.5000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 337.7846 0.0166 338.1339 1 '1 003 003 003 ii Total 0.2327 1.3037 3.3127 8.1500e- 0.4863 0.0224 0.5087 0.1311 0.0206 0.1517 686.3710 0.0192 686.7743 003 1 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road „ 1.2310 i 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 , 11,722.2285' 0.5342 1,733.4458 .............................. ii �. ......................................i..................:...................-..................{....................... .................................. ..................:........................................................................ 1 11 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: ; 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; i .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... i :,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 �: 1 0.6658 0.6658 1 ...............1 ...............: .............. ............. .. .............. ---------------- '. ,.................... ....................:...,..................:......................................................... ...................................... Worker �? 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.340, 149.1767 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.3400e- 149.1767 003 003 1 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road :i 1.2310 i 12.4141 i 11.7009 0.0176 0.72250.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 ; 11,722.2285I' 0.5342 + 1,733.4458 ................... ................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................... i..................;...................-..................{...................�................. ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... E :,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- �: E 0.1288 ...............E ...............: .............. ............. .. .............. ---------------- '. ,.................... ....................:...,..................:......................................................... ...................................... Worker �? 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.340, 149.1767 281.9473 003 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.3400e- 149.1767 003 003 1 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 243.3375 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .:...........................................................................a...................a......................................a...................'...................i..................:.....................................a................. �. ..... ..... ... Off -Road ; 0.2664 1 1.8354 1.8413 E 2.9700e- 1 0.1288 0.1288 1 0.1288 0.1288 ; E 281.4481E 0.0238 281.9473 ;E 003 ; .E Total 243.6039 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... E ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 W orker ,; 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- i 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 281.9473 004 004 004 ii 003 003 Total 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 004 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 243.3375 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .'...........................................................................a...................a......................................a......................................i..................:.....................................a................. �. ..... ..... ... Off -Road ; 0.2664 1 1.8354 1.8413 E 2.9700e- 1 0.1288 0.1288 1 0.1288 0.1288 ; E 281.4481E 0.0238 281.9473 ;E 003 ; .E Total 243.6039 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 : Mitigated 91 4.7806 12.7941 49.4611 0.1357 9.4919 0.1949 9.6869 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9 ................... ........................................ t............... ..... .... W orker ,; 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- i 0.0782 6.00OOe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 0.1357 9.4919 004 004 004 ii 003 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 ' Total 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- 0.0782 6.00OOe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 6 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 004 004 1 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day : Mitigated 91 4.7806 12.7941 49.4611 0.1357 9.4919 0.1949 9.6869 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 10,888.054; 0.4046 110,896.551 .: : 6 9 ................... ........................................ t............... ..... .... . ... ................... Unmitigated ; 4.7806 '• 12.7941 49.4611 0.1357 9.4919 0.1949 9.6869 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 ' :10,888.054:: 0.4046 ::10,896.551 6 9 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW . 1,142.00 i......._164.00 76.00 ; 2,871,853 ; 2,871,853 ..................Office .Park .......................................................;. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru i. 450.30 450.30 450.30 ............................................................................................................ 616,260 616,260 Total 1,592.30 614.30 526.30 3,488,113 3,488,113 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by W Office Park I 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.0048.00 3 119.00 ; 82 ; 15 ; 3 ..............................:................................................................................. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 .......................... ............................................................ 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category s Use Ib/day PM10 I Ib/day Total NaturalGas ;1 0.0356 1 0.3232 1 0.2715 1.9400e- i 0.0246 1 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 1 387.8324E 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 Mitigated ;1 003 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day 1 003 003 r........................................ 003 003 003 :.. : : .......................................:...................:................. ..............;.........................................................;...................;....................*..................:......................................I......................................................... Pharmacy/Drugst E 28.0822 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- , 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- , 2.1000e- 2.1000e- ; 3.3038 , 6.000Oe- , 6.000Oe- 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 1 003 1 005 1 004 1 004 004 004 ; 005 005 TL... . Total 0.0356 .............................. ... ...:. ...... . ............. ..................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ............. ............. `. NaturalGas ; 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 E 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 E 0.0246 0.0246 ; E 387.8324E 7.4300e- E 7.1100e- E 390.1927 Unmitigated ;E 7.4300e- 003 390.1927 ; 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Office Park E 3268.49 3E 0.0353 E 0.3204 E 0.2692 E 1.9200e- E 1 0.0244 E 0.0244 0.0244 E 0.0244 ; 1 384.5286 E 7.3700e- E 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 003 003 :.. : : .......................................:...................:................. ..............;.........................................................;...................;....................*..................:......................................I......................................................... Pharmacy/Drugst E 28.0822 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- , 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- , 2.1000e- 2.1000e- ; 3.3038 , 6.000Oe- , 6.000Oe- 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 1 003 1 005 1 004 1 004 004 004 ; 005 005 TL... . Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- I ; Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst i 0.0280822:: 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- 3.3038 6.000Oe- I 6.000Oe- 1 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 TM... : 1i ...................• i i i i i ............................f.................................................................................................................. ................... j................... ................... .................... ;...............................................................................;................... •................... Office Park i 3.26849 41 0.0353 i 0.3204 0.2692 1.9200e- i i 0.0244 I 0.0244 i i 0.0244 i 0.0244 , 1384.5286 1 7.3700e- i 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 003 003 .... Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 ........... 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 003 004 005 005 003 003 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.7467 i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- 0.0243 ; 004 005 I 1............... 005 005 005 i 005 .... .............. .............. ...... --- I.................1............... -----------------i............... .............. ........... Unmitigated ; 2.7467 1.000Oe- '• 0.0108 0.0000 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 ; 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 0.0000 .............................. :...................:...................:...................:...................:................... :................... :................... :................... :................... :..................... F ................... ................... j................... ................... ................... ;................... Consumer ; 2.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products.............. ..............i:................... ..............:...................°...................I...................I... I.. ;..... I.. .......... .............. ............... ... .. .............. .............. .............;................... Landscaping ;i 1.0300e- 1.00001- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00001- 4.00001- 4.00001- , 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 1 0.0243 Consumer .i 003 004 005 005 005 1 005 005 t Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 ; 4.00001- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.00001- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 005 005 005 005 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Coating........... �.... �.... ..............i:................... .........................................................;....................... ............. ;... ...�.... .. .. ...... * .............. -- ....... ....................................... ............. Consumer ; 2.0790 1 I I i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r r Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 ; 0.0230 i 6.000Oe- 0.0243 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 ; r 005 Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 1:30 PM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 100.00 1000sgft 2.30 100,000.00 0 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru ; 5.00 ; 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2019 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Architectural Coating - From PD, following SCAQMD guide for interior/exterior areas, added mitigation of low VOC paint CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ; ConstArea_Nonresidentlal_Exterior 52,500.00 26,250.00 i........................................................................... .. ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 157,500.00 78,750.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF—Nonresidential—Exterior 250.00 50.00 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential _Interior 250.00 50.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_ Residential_ Exterior 100.00 0.00 i ......................... .................................................................................................................................. E...................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 50.00 0.00 ..............................................................................i.............................................................................................................................................................:...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 i.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 264.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 .. i........................................................................................................................................................ ;... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase ; NumDays ; 6.00 10.00 r tblConstructionPhase i NumDays 3.00 5.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/20/2018 1/4/2019 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/19/2019 1/21/2019 tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 12/16/2017 1/2/2018 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;.................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 12/2/2017 12/4/2017 tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/25/2017 11/27/2017 tblGrading ; AcresOfGrading 5.00 3.00 .............................................................................. i............................................................................................................................................................ ...................................................................... tblGrading ; AcresOfGrading 7.50 4.50 ...........................................................................i........................................................................................................................................................ tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear ; 2014 2019 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 ; 0.0769 i 0.7686 0.5915 7.6000e- i 0.0578 0.0438 i 0.1016 0.0212 0.0408 i 0.0619 i 68.6251 1 0.0161 i 0.0000 68.9641 1 7.6000e- 1 0.0578 004 1 r I 68.6250 0.0161 .: 68.9640 2018 ; 0.4081 2.8606 2.4913 4.3100e- 0.0621 0.1657 0.2278 0.0168 0.1587 0.1755 i ; :003 i 357.4677 i 0.0611 0.0000 004.........................� ..................................... .......................................*..................:...................................... .................................................'...................1...................1...................1................. ............. .............. ............. ...............................+..................:...................1.........................................................[358.7514 .. �... ...`... . ' ...' .. ' ................. 2019 ;i 0.1343 0.1073 0.1044 1.7000e- 1.9700e- 6.1600e- 8.1300e- 1 5.3000e- l 5.7800e- 6.3100e- 14.7275 3.4200e- 0.0000 14.7993 i 4.3100e- 0.0621 ,i 004 003 003 003 I 004 I 003 003 003 357.4674 1 0.0611 0.0000 358.7511 Total 0.6193 3.7365 3.1871 5.2400e- 0.1219 0.2156 0.3375 0.0385 0.2052 0.2437 •................... 0.1044 440.8204 0.0807 0.0000 442.5148 0.0000 11 r 003 004 003 003 003 004 003 003 ; r 003 Total 0.6193 3.7365 1 5.2400e- Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 ; 0.0769 0.7686 0.5915 1 7.6000e- 1 0.0578 0.0438 0.1016 0.0212 0.0408 0.0619 ; I 68.6250 0.0161 0.0000 68.9640 '0................... ................. ... ..... 004.........................� ..................................... .......................................*..................:...................................... .................... 2018 �1 ; 0.4081 1 2.8606 1 2.4913 i 4.3100e- 0.0621 0.1657 0.2278 0.0168 0.1587 0.1755 357.4674 1 0.0611 0.0000 358.7511 ;i 003 2019 .i .... ; 0.1343 0.1073 •................... 0.1044 •...................' 1.7000e- i 1.9700e- ------------------- '------------------ - 6.1600e- 8.1300e- 1 5.3000e- 1 5.7800e- 6.3100e- ; 14.7275 i 3.4200e- 0.0000 14.7993 r 004 003 003 003 004 003 003 ; r 003 Total 0.6193 3.7365 3.1871 5.2400e- 0.1219 0.2156 0.3375 0.0385 0.2052 0.2437 440.8199 0.0807 0.0000 442.5144 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Waste ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 r r 49.1446 r r r r ; Water 1 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 5.7504 0.5906 0.0140 r. r r. r r. r 22.4767 Total 1.1726 1.9242 7.2280 0.0199 1.3222 0.0321 1.3543 0.3538 0.0300 0.3838 11,510.56291 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area ; 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ;I 2.6100e- I 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- ; 005 003 ; 003 005 ; 003 r ______________ ___ __ .......... ___ __ r ................... .. _ Energy ; 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0496 3.5000e- i 4.4800e- i 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- ; 64.2100 i 1 2300e- 1 1800e- : 64.6008 003 i 004 i 003 r .; 003 003 003 003 003 : i i Mobile ; 0.6649 1.8652 1 7.1771 1 0.0195 1 1.3222 0.0276 1.3498 1 0.3538 0.0255 0.3793 ; 11,418.67081 0.0522 0.0000 r r 1,419.7671 r r r r Waste ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 r r 49.1446 r r r r ; Water 1 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 5.7504 0.5906 0.0140 r. r r. r r. r 22.4767 Total 1.1726 1.9242 7.2280 0.0199 1.3222 0.0321 1.3543 0.3538 0.0300 0.3838 11,510.56291 1.9400 0.0151 1,555.9919 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area ; 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 2.7500e- : 005 003 003 005 003 ; ; : ; : .: Ener 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0496 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 9Y �� � 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 I... °... I... �.. ..............................':...................°................... i...................I................... i................ ' ................:...................I................. ..... .............. ............. Mobile ; 0.6649 1.8652 7.1771 0.0195 1.3222 0.0276 1.3498 0.3538 0.0255 0.3793 1,418.6708 0.0522 0.0000 11,419.7671 0.00 �; .... .... ;... ... ..... ....... .............. .............. Waste ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 21.9291 1 1.2960 1 0.0000 49.1446 ; �. .................... .............. .............. .............. ............. Water; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.7504 0.5906 0.0140 22.4767 ii Total 1.1726 1.9242 7.2280 0.0199 1.3222 0.0321 1.3543 0.3538 0.0300 0.3838 1,510.5629 1.9400 0.0151 1,555.9919 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 :Demolition :Demolition ;10/2/2017 11/24/2017 5E 40 ................;............................................................. 2 :Site Preparation :Site Preparation ;11/27/2017 :12/1/2017 5 5 ............................................................. ..................................................... ........................... ........................... ............................................. .............................................................. 3 :Grading :Grading 112/4/2017 :12/15/2017 5 10 4 ;Building Construction ;Building Construction ;1/2/2018 1/4/2019 5 264 ...............;............................................................. 5 ;Paving ;Paving ;1/7/2019 1/18/2019 5 10 ...............;............................................................. 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5 5 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 78,750; Non -Residential Outdoor: 26,250 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition ;Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.001 811 0.73 ........................................................................... ......................................... ............................................... ............................. ............................... .................................... ..................................... Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 : 8.00:: 255:: 0.40 .................................................................................................................................... Demolition ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ............................................................................... 3: .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Site Preparation .Graders1...................................................................... ; r ............................................ .................................. .................................... 8.00:: 1741: ..................................... 0.41 .......................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... Scrapers . ............................................................................. 1 .................................... 8.001 3611 ..................................... 0.48 ........................................................................... Site Preparation ......................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 7.001 971 0.37 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... ;Graders ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.00:: 174:: ..................................... 0.41 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... i Rubber Tired Dozers . ........................................................................ 1 .................................... 8.00 255 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Grading ......................................................... . ... iTractors/Loaders/Backhoes i . .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 7.001 971 0.37 .......................................................................... Building Construction i ..................................................................... Cranes . .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 8.00 2261 0.29 .......................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................................................................ .................................... ..................................... Building Construction Forklifts 2:: 7.00:: 891 0.20 .................................................................................................................................................. Building Construction :Generator Sets r ............................................................................... .................................... 8.00:: 84:: 1 ..................................... 0.74 .......................................................................... Building Construction ...................................................................... . ............................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 .................................... 6.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Building Construction ......................................... ............................. ;Welders . ..................................... ............................................................................................................. 3 8.00 46: 0.45 ........................................................................... Paving ................................................................. ;Cement and Mortar Mixers ............................................................................... .................................... 8.001: 9: ..................................... 0.56 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Pavers ............................................................................... 1 .......................................................................... 8.001 1251 0.42 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... ;Paving Equipment . ......................................................................... ................................... 8.00: 130:: 0.36 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Rollers ............................................................................... 2:: .................................... 8.001: 80:: ..................................... 0.38 ........................................................................... Paving P ....................................................................... Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . ........................................................................ 1 ................................... .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 .......................................................................... Architectural Coating ...................................................................... 'Air Compressors .................................... 6.00: 78:: ..................................... 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 51 13.00; 0.00; 172.00'• 14.70: 6.90; 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ........................ Site Preparation 31 8.00: 0.00': ........................... 0.00: .............................. 14.70: 6.90: -� 20.00; LD Mix ' HDT_Mix HHDT ...................................................--------------------------------r---------------------------............................ Grading 4i 10.00; ;..........................�---------------------..............................-------------------------r----...................................................................................... 0.001 0.00; 14.70; 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix :HDTMix HHDT ........................ Building Construction 81 r 34.00: ;.......................... 17.001 0.00 .. 14.70: ........................ :.. ... 6.90: . 20.00: LID .. HDT_Mix ........................... HHDT ........................... Paving 6 ....................................................... 15.00 0.001 . 0.00; 14.70 6.90; -------------------------- 20.00 LID Mix "HDT_Mix '...... ,............ HHDT .............................................................................. .................................. ---------- ...................... -------------------------- Architectural Coating 1: 7.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: ...................... 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix ...................... : HDT_Mix ..................... : HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ; 0.0187 0.0000 0.0187 2.8200e- I 0.0000 2.8200e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; ; : ; 003 003 i ; .................... .......... t•• ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................,...................;................... ....................................... Off -Road ; 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0321 0.0321 0.0300 0.0300 44.5876 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 004 Total 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0187 0.0321 0.0508 2.8200e- 0.0300 0.0329 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 004 003 1 174.5876 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 1.4400e- 0.0228 0.0181 6.000Oe- 1.4700e- 3.4000e- 1.8200e- i 4.000Oe- I 3.1000e- 7.2000e- 5.6970 4.000Oe- i 0.0000 5.6979 : : : : : : V 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 : 005 : Off -Road ; 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 1 4.9000e- 0.0321 0.0321 0.0300 0.0300 ; i 44.5875 i 0.0113 0.0000 .: ;i 004 ; .i Vendor 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.00000.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0187 0.0321 : : i i ' ; `................... ..............................«. .................................................. .............. .............. .............. ............. ................+..................i...................;...................;................... .. ...... .. ..... ..... ..... .... ...... .............. ................... Worker ; 9.4000e- 1.3900e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 2.8500e- 2.000Oe- 2.8800e- 7.6000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- i 2.5699 1.3000e- 0.0000 2.5727 ;1 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Total 2.3800e- 0.0242 0.0325 1.000Oe- 4.3200e- 3.6000e- 4.7000e- 1.1600e- 3.3000e- 1.5000e- 8.2669 1.7000e- 0.0000 8.2706 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust; 0.0187 0.0000 0.0187 + 2.8200e- I 0.0000 I 2.8200e- ; 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 ' ii......................................................................................................................................i..................:............................................................................ ..............................r...................;..................................... . . Off -Road ; 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 1 4.9000e- 0.0321 0.0321 0.0300 0.0300 ; i 44.5875 i 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 ;i 004 ; .i Total 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0187 0.0321 0.0508 2.8200e- 0.0300 0.0329 44.5875 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 1.4400e- 0.0228 0.0181 6.000Oe- 1.4700e- 3.4000e- 1.8200e- i 4.000Oe- 1 3.1000e- 7.2000e- 5.6970 4.000Oe- i 0.0000 5.6979 : : : : : : V 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 : 005 : Off -Road ; 6.3200e- 0.0716 0.0428 16.000Oe- I i 3.4900e- i 3.4900e- i i 3.2100e- I 3.2100e- ; 5.5326 i 1.7000e- i 0.0000 .: 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .: Vendor 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.00000.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0428 6.000Oe- 2.3900e- 3.4900e- : : i i ' ; `................... ..............................«. .................................................. .............. .............. .............. ............. ................+..................i...................;...................;................... .. ...... .. ..... ..... ..... .... ...... .............. ................... Worker ; 9.4000e- 1.3900e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 2.8500e- 2.000Oe- 2.8800e- 7.6000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- i 2.5699 1.3000e- 0.0000 2.5727 003 ;1 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Total 2.3800e- 0.0242 0.0325 1.000Oe- 4.3200e- 3.6000e- 4.7000e- 1.1600e- 3.3000e- 1.5000e- 8.2669 1.7000e- 0.0000 8.2706 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ; 12.3900e- 1 0.0000 2.3900e- i 2.6000e- 1 0.0000 1 2.6000e- ; 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 0.0000 ' 003 003 004 004 ' r...................:........................................................................................ ......................... .......................................T..................................................................... ................... ...... ............. Off -Road ; 6.3200e- 0.0716 0.0428 16.000Oe- I i 3.4900e- i 3.4900e- i i 3.2100e- I 3.2100e- ; 5.5326 i 1.7000e- i 0.0000 5.5682 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .: Total 6.3200e- 0.0716 0.0428 6.000Oe- 2.3900e- 3.4900e- 5.8800e- 2.6000e- 3.2100e- 3.4700e- 5.5326 1.7000e- 0.0000 5.5682 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........:........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;....... ............ ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.3200e- 0.0716 ..............................« .................i ....... i ........E....................'...................`...................'...................'....................+ .0000....2.20 ..................i.`................... '.... ............... `................ .................. W orker 7.000Oe- 1. 0 1110 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 3.2100e- 005 003 004 004 005 005 i 005 Total 7.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.1100e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 003 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ; i 2.3900e- I 0.0000 2.3900e- i 2.6000e- i 0.0000 2.6000e- ; 0.00000.00 00 i 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 �:.............................................................................T................................................................................................................ Off -Road ; 6.3200e- ; 0.0716 0.0428 16.000Oe- i 3.4900e- i 3.4900e- i I 3.2100e- 3.2100e- ; 5.5325 i 1.7000e- i 0.0000 5.5681 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .: Total 6.3200e- 0.0716 0.0428 6.000Oe- 2.3900e- 3.4900e- 5.8800e- 2.6000e- 3.2100e- 3.4700e- 5.5325 1.7000e- 0.0000 5.5681 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........:........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;....... ............ ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0135 0.1408 ..............................« .................i ....... i ........E....................'...................`...................'...................'....................+ .0000....2.20 ..................i.`................... '.... ............... `................ .................. W orker 7.000Oe- 1. 0 1110 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 0.0239 005 003 004 004 005 005 i 005 Total 7.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.1100e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr i i I � i i Fugitive Dust 0.0317 0.0000 0.0317 0.0167 0.0000 0.0167 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .................................................;...................---------................................................................................ :...................--....................................... �- Off -Road ; 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 I 1.000Oe- i 7.7800e- i 7.7800e- i I 7.1500e- 7.1500e- ; 9.5462 i 2.9200e- i 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 Total 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 1.000Oe- 0.0317 7.7800e- 0.0395 0.0167 7.15007 0.0239 9.5462 2.9200e- 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road ; 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 I 1.000Oe- i 7.7800e- i 7.7800e- i I 7.1500e- 7.1500e- ; 9.5462 i 2.92OOe- i 0.0000 �• r :... :... I... :... r W orker «... ......................................................... ...:... ...:... ..:... �? 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 , 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- ,..............................................................................................1................... 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 0.0395 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 Total 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr i i I � i i Fugitive Dust 0.0317 0.0000 0.0317 0.0167 0.0000 0.0167 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .................................................;...................---------................................................................................ :...................--....................................... �- Off -Road ; 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 I 1.000Oe- i 7.7800e- i 7.7800e- i I 7.1500e- 7.1500e- ; 9.5462 i 2.92OOe- i 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 Total 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 1.000Oe- 0.0317 7.7800e- 0.0395 0.0167 7.15007 0.0239 9.5462 2.9200e- 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; • ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �• r 0.3771 :... :... I... :... r W orker «... ......................................................... ...:... ...:... ..:... �? 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 , 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- ,..............................................................................................1................... 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 Total 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- i 0.1626 0.1626 0.1559 0.1559 ; i 273.2778 0.0587 i 0.0000 274.5111 003 Total 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 0.1626 0.1626 0.1559 0.1559 273.2778 0.0587 0.0000 274.5111 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: ...................:...................:...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................; i ;i 0.01680.1665 0.2335 4.8000e- 0.0136 2.6500e- 0.0163 3.8800e- I 2.4400e- 6.3200e- ................... ;................... ;................ ... 42.1329 3.000Oe- i 0.0000 42.1393 003 �• : : 004 003 003 003 003 r : 004 i E i 0.3771 Worker ;i 0.0143 0.0214 i 0.2215 6.000Oe- 0.0485 3.9000e- 0.0489 0.0129 3.6000e- 0.0132 42.0571 2.1000e- 0.0000 42.1011 0.1626 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 0.1559 Total 0.0311 0.1878 0.4550 1.0800e- 0.0621 3.0400e- 0.0651 0.0168 2.8000e- 0.0196 84.1900 2.4000e- 0.0000 84.2404 003 003 1 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 1 0.1626 0.1626 0.1559 0.1559 ; i 273.2774 0.0587 + 0.0000 274.5107 003 Total 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 0.1626 0.1626-70.15591 .16260.1559 0.1559 273.2774 0.0587 0.0000 274.5107 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: ...................:...................:...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................; i ;i 0.01680.1665 0.2335 4.8000e- 0.0136 2.6500e- 0.0163 3.8800e- I 2.4400e- 6.3200e- ................... ;................... ;................ ... 42.1329 3.00OOe- i 0.0000 42.1393 003 005 003 003 003 003 r �• : : 004 003 003 003 003 r : 004 i E i 5.0900e- Worker ;i 0.0143 0.0214 i 0.2215 6.00OOe- 0.0485 3.9000e- 0.0489 0.0129 3.6000e- 0.0132 42.0571 2.1000e- 0.0000 42.1011 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 2.0800e- 2.0800e- Total 0.0311 0.1878 0.4550 1.0800e- 0.0621 3.0400e- 0.0651 0.0168 2.8000e- 0.0196 84.1900 2.4000e- 0.0000 84.2404 003 003 003 1 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I 1 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 5.0900e- i 0.0376 0.0304 5.00OOe- i i 2.1700e- 2.1700e- i 2.0800e- 2.0800e- ; 4.1727 8.7000e- i 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 r � 004 Total 5.0900e- 0.0376 0.0304 5.00OOe- 2.1700e- 2.1700e- 2.0800e- 2.0800e- 4.1727 8.7000e- 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.11,111,111,11"**",.*********..........,.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................;...................;...................;................... Vendor .: . ; : i ; 2.4000e- 2.3600e- 3.4700e- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 14.000Oe- 2.5000e- i 6.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 1.000Oe- . 0.6356 0.0000 0.0000 0.6357 004 � �• 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 r .............................. �; I i i ° «...................'.........................................................•...................'......................................`...................'................... I....................+...................................... r `...................'.................................... ...................... W orker 2.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.6224 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6230 2.1700e- 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 4.4000e- 2.6600e- 6.5900e- 2.000Oe- 9.6000e- 5.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.6000e- 5.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.2580 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2587 003 004 003 003 005 004 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Im tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 5.0900e- 0.0376 0.0304 5.000Oe- 2.1700e- 2.1700e- i 2.0800e- 2.0800e- ; 4.1727 8.7000e- i 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 r 004 � Total 5.0900e- 0.0376 0.0304 5.000Oe- 2.1700e- 2.1700e- 2.0800e- 2.0800e- 4.1727 8.7000e- 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.11,111,111,11"**",.*********..........,.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................;...................;...................;................... Vendor .: . ; : i ; 2.4000e- 2.3600e- 3.4700e- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 1 4.000Oe- 2.5000e- 1 6.000Oe- 1 4.000Oe- 1.000Oe- . 0.6356 0.0000 0.0000 0.6357 Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �• 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 r .............................. �; 1 i i ° «...................'.........................................................•...................'......................................`...................'...................1....................+...................................... r `...................'...................1...................................... W orker 2.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.6224 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6230 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 4.4000e- 2.6600e- 6.5900e- 2.000Oe- 9.6000e- 5.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.6000e- 5.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.2580 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2587 004 003 003 005 004 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr . Off -Road ; 6.1600e- 1 0.0621 1 0.0585 1 9.000Oe- 1 3.6100e- I 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- ; 7.8119 I 2.4200e- + 0.0000 ttE 7.8628 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 ( I �.................... �................... �................... �: 1 1 ...................j................... i ....................................... -.................. . .................. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.1600e- 0.0621 0.0585 9.0000 3.6100e- 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- 7.8119 2.4200e- 0.0000 7.8628 003 005 1 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; : , ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �• r 0.0621 : r ..:... ...:... ...:... ..:... ........................... ,..............................................................................................1................... W orker fl 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 7.8119 ;; 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 . 005 Total 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ;i 6.1600e- i 0.0621 0.0585 1 9.000Oe- 1 3.6100e- i 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- ; 7.8119 2.4200e- i 0.0000 7.8628 ji 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .............................. r....................................�................ .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ................. i............... .................................................................... ..... ..... .... ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.1600e- 0.0621 0.0585 9.000Oe- 3.6100e- 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- 7.8119 2.4200e- 0.0000 7.8628 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; : • ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road ; 6.7000e- 14.5900e- i 4.6000e- I 1.000Oe- : i 3.2000e- i 3.2000e- i I 3.2000e- 3.2000e- ; 0.6383 i 5.000Oe- i 0.0000 �• r : r 4.6000e- ..:... ...:... ...:... ..:... ........................... ,..............................................................................................1................... W orker fl 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 3.2000e- ;; 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 . 005 Total 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 004 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 1 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.1217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I, :...........................................................i..................;...................------------- ......{...................................... r ...................: .................. ......................................................... .................. .................. ................... Off -Road ; 6.7000e- 14.5900e- i 4.6000e- I 1.000Oe- : i 3.2000e- i 3.2000e- i I 3.2000e- 3.2000e- ; 0.6383 i 5.000Oe- i 0.0000 0.6395 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 Total 0.1223 4.5900e- 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.6383 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6395 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........:........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;....... ............ ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; I : 4.6000e- i i i W orker 5.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 0.0000 1.9000e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.1602 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1603 3.2000e- 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Total 5.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 8.00010e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 5.0000e- 004 0.1602 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1603 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr ,. Archit. Coating 0.1217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I r ...................: .................. ............................................................i..................;...................------------- ............................................ ........................................................ .................. .................. ................... Off -Road ; 6.7000e- 14.5900e- i 4.6000e- I 1.000Oe- i 3.2000e- i 3.2000e- i I 3.2000e- 3.2000e- ; 0.6383 i 5.000Oe- i 0.0000 0.6394 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 Total 0.1223 4.5900e- 4.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 3.2000e- 0.6383 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6394 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 71 0.0195 1.3222 1 0.0276 1.3498 0.3538 0.0255 I 1,418.67081 0.0522 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........;........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;....... ............ ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3538 ; I : 1,418.6708; 0.0522 i I i W orker 5.00OOe- 8.00OOe- 8.00OOe- 0.0000 1.9000e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 5.00OOe- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 0.1602 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1603 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 Total 5.00OOe- 8.00OOe- 8.00OOe- 0.0000 1.9000e- 0.0000 1.9000e- 5.00OOe- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 0.1602 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1603 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated ; 0.6649 1.86527.17 71 0.0195 1.3222 1 0.0276 1.3498 0.3538 0.0255 0.3793 1,418.67081 0.0522 0.0000 111,419.7671 : Unmitigated ; 0.6649 1.8652 7.1771 0.0195 1.3222 0.0276 1.3498 0.3538 0.0255 0.3793 ; 1,418.6708; 0.0522 0.0000 :1,419.7671 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW . 1,142.00 i......._164.00 76.00 ; 2,871,853 ; 2,871,853 ..................Office .Park .......................................................;. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru i. 450.30 450.30 450.30 ............................................................................................................ 616,260 616,260 Total 1,592.30 614.30 526.30 3,488,113 3,488,113 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by W Office Park I 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.0048.00 3 119.00 ; 82 ; 15 ; 3 ..............................:................................................................................. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 .......................... ............................................................ 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr MT/yr 5.000Oe- 4.2000e- i 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; i 0.5470 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.5503 ore w/o Drive 005 004 004005 005 005 Electricity ;i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Office Park i 1.193e i 6.4300e- 0.0585 0.0491 i 3.5000e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- ; 63.6630 1.2200e- .............................. M...................j......................................�................... t......................................'................ +006 003 ............. .............. .................t.................. i......................................i..................................................... Electricity ;I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0495 3.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 003 004 003 003 003 003 ..................M.........................................................�................. ...�....................... .....Unmitigated ............. ............. .............. .............. ............... .. } .....I......................................�...................... .............. ............. ............. NaturalGas ;I 6.4900e- i 0.0590 0.0496 , 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- ! i 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 1 64.6008 Mitigated ;I 003 i . I 004 , 003 . 003 003 003 003 i 003 1 ! ..............................! NaturalGas ; 6.4900e- i 0.0590 0.0496 i 3.5000e- E 4.4800e- E 4.4800e- E E 4.4800e- i 4.4800e- ; E 64.2100 E 1.2300e- ............. E 1.1800e- i 64.6008 Unmitigated ; 003 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 10250 i 6.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 4.2000e- i 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; i 0.5470 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.5503 ore w/o Drive 005 004 004005 005 005 005 ; 005 005 TL .. ! Office Park i 1.193e i 6.4300e- 0.0585 0.0491 i 3.5000e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- ; 63.6630 1.2200e- 1.1700e- 64.0505 +006 003 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 003 Total 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0495 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use Pharmacy/Drugst 64000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I PM10 PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I P 0.0000 I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst i 10250 6.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 4.2000e- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- I 4.000Oe- I 4.000Oe- 0.5470 1.000Oe- I 1.000Oe- I 0.5503 ore w/o Drive 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 005 ,................... ........... it" ::........... f..................i...................1................... ................... I................... ................... i ...................................... j.. ................ i ....................................... yi ...................................... .......,................... ............... Office Park 1.193e :I 6.4300e- 0.0585 0.0491 3.5000e- 4.4400e- 14.4400e- I 4.4400e- I 4.4400e- 63.6630 1.2200e- I 1.1700e- 64.0505 +006 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 Total 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0495 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kW h/yr MT/yr Office Park i 1.717e ;i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 +006 .; .......................................�................. Pharmacy/Drugst 64000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ore w/o Drive TN. Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Exhaust I PM10 Use Fugitive PM2.5 I I Land Use kW h/yr MT/yr Office Park i 1.717e 3i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 +006 .............................. . ................. .......................... ..... ...... ................... ................... Pharmacy/Drugst i 64000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ore w/o Drive Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust I PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.5012 i 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- I 0000e 0.0000 2.7500e- ' 005 003 003 005 003 .............................. ....... ....... ............... ................... ................... ....................................... ................... ..................... .................. ! ............ ........... .. .............. .............. Unmitigated 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- ; 005 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ; 0.1217 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ..............................:...................:...................:...................:..................•;...................;..................•;...................;...................;...................;.................... 0.0000 ° ;................... Consumer 0.3794 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products .... ..I... ...�.... ............. .. .. ...... .............. * ...1--- ........................:.............................................................................................................1................... ...:... ..:... ...:. ..:... ............. Landscaping ; 1.3000e- 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- �i 004 005 003 003 005 003 Total 0.5012 1.0000e- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.61OOe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- _ r __ 005 003 Landscaping ; 1.3000e- i 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ; 2.61OOe- i 1.000Oe- 003 005 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ; 0.1217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CoatingI............. ..............i:............................................................................;...................1------------......... .... ..I... ...�.... ............. .. .. ...... .............. * ...1--- I ............ ...�.... �.... ............. ............. Consumer ; 0.3794 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r _ r __ Landscaping ; 1.3000e- i 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ; 2.61OOe- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- ; 004 005 r 003 r 003 005 003 Total 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.61OOe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 28 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM .1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated ; 5.7504 i 0.5906 1 0.0140 22.4767 .: Unmitigated ;1 5.7504 ` 0.5906 i 0.0140 i 22.4767 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Office Park i 17.7734 / i 5.6387 i 0.5792 1 0.0137 22.0400 10.8934 .......................................... ................... :.................. :................... Pharmacy/Drugst 10.352238 / 1 0.1118 i 0.0115 1 2.7000e- 0.4368 ore w/o Drive TN. 1 0.215888: 004 Total 5.7504 0.5906 1 0.0139 22.4767 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 29 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr door Use , ..........................I:. ............. ............. ................i............... I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Office Park i 17.7734/ Ei 5.6387 i 0.5792 i 0.0137 i 22.0400 10.8934 Pharmacy/Drugst 10.352238 / V 0.1118 i 0.0115 i 2.7000e- i 0.4368 ore w/o Drive 10.215888E 004 TM. Total 5.7504 0.5906 0.0139 22.4767 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated ; 21.9291 i 1.2960 i 0.0000 49.1446 , ..........................I:. ............. ............. ................i............... Unmitigated ; 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 '• 49.1446 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 30 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I I Land Use tons MT/yr Office Park : 93 i 18.8782 1 1.1157 0.0000 i 42.3072 .............................. .................. .................... I ................... ....................................... Pharmacy/Drugst i 15.03 3.0510 1 0.1803 0.0000 i 6.8374 ore w/o Drive Total 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 49.1446 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I I Land Use tons MT/yr Office Park 93 i 18.8782 1 1.1157 0.0000 42.3072 .............................. .................. ........... ................ ................... Pharmacy/Drugst 15.03 99:: 3.0510 0.1803 0.0000 6.8374 ore w/o Drive Total 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 49.1446 9.0 Operational Offroad IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 31 of 31 Date: 2/2/2016 9:06 AM 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 100.00 1000sgft 2.30 100,000.00 0 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru ; 5.00 ; 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2019 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Architectural Coating - From PD, following SCAQMD guide for interior/exterior areas, added mitigation of low VOC paint CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ; ConstArea_Nonresidentlal_Exterior 52,500.00 26,250.00 i........................................................................... .. ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 157,500.00 78,750.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF—Nonresidential—Exterior 250.00 50.00 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential _Interior 250.00 50.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_ Residential_ Exterior 100.00 0.00 i ......................... .................................................................................................................................. E...................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 50.00 0.00 ..............................................................................i.............................................................................................................................................................:...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 i.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 264.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 .. i........................................................................................................................................................ ;... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase ; NumDays ; 6.00 10.00 r tblConstructionPhase i NumDays 3.00 5.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/20/2018 1/4/2019 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/19/2019 1/21/2019 tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 12/16/2017 1/2/2018 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;.................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 12/2/2017 12/4/2017 tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/25/2017 11/27/2017 tblGrading ; AcresOfGrading 5.00 3.00 .............................................................................. i............................................................................................................................................................ ...................................................................... tblGrading ; AcresOfGrading 7.50 4.50 ...........................................................................i........................................................................................................................................................ tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear ; 2014 2019 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8399 i 28.6607 i 22.4351 0.0295 i 6.4520 1.6245 i 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 i 4.8057 : ; 2,920.4890; 0.7519 i 0.0000 12,936.2798 1 1.6245 8.0079 .: 4.8057 2018 i i : 3.137021.9316 18.9964 0.0334 0.4863 1.2744 1.7607 0.1311 1.2207 1.3517 :3,050.2011: 0.5183 0.0000 3,061.0852 ...........................la.................................. i i 1. .............. 777 .............. ......................................1-------------...... ............................................................................ I..... I ..................;................... j------------.......�...................�.... ........... ..............i..............E .............e ...... ............. .............. ... .............. ............. .......................... 2019 48.9558 20.0444 5932 1.1914 3,011.6126 0.5415 0.0000 3,022.9840 Total 54.9327 70.6367 59.7652 0.0962 7.4247 4.0057 11.3618 3.6363 3.8000 7.3488 1 18,982.3027 1.8117 1 0.0000 9,020.3490 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8399 i 28.6607 II 22.4351 1 0.0295 6.4520 1 1.6245 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 4.8057 „ 2,920.4890 i 0.7519 ° 0.0000 2,936.2798 ...........................la.................................. i i 1. .............. 777 .............. ......................................1-------------...... ............................................................................ ..................;................... j------------.......�...................�.... ............. ............. 2018 3.1370 i 21.9316 r 18.9964 I 0.0334 0.4863 1 1.2744 1.7607 1 0.1311 1.2207 1.3517 ; 3,050.20111 0.5183 r 0.0000 3,061.0852 r -------------------- �i ....... ............................................. ............ ................... .................*rr r ..................:; ...................................1......................................................... 2019 48.9558 20.0444 rrr 36 0.0334 0.4863 1.1068 1.5932 0.1311 1.0603 1.1914 3,011.61261 0.5415 r 0.0000 3,022.9840 Total 54.9327 70.6367 59.7652 0.0962 7.4247 4.0057 11.3618 3.6363 3.8000 7.3488 1771.8117 0.0000 9,020.3489 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM ROG NO CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 1.00OOe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 0.0230 6.00OOe- 0.0243 0.0000 i 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 004 005 1 005 005 005 005 ..................................................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.................... 0.0243 ,................... ;................... ....................................... Energy .� 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 � 387.8324 i 7.4300e- � 7.1100e- 390.1927 005 r 003 003 003 .............................. .. �... ...`... ...'... .. �... .................. .'................... I..... .............. I..................................... ............. .............. ............. ...............................+.................. i......................................'......................................................... Mobile ;i 4.6325 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 0.1790 2.7153 11,431.720 0.4042 11,440.207 . ...................*...................................... ,i 0 3 Energy ; 0.0356 0.3232 1 0.2715 Total 7.4148 12.5187 49.9008 0.1448 9.4919 0.2187 9.7107 2.5363 0.2036 2.7399 ; 003 003 11,819.575 0.4116 7.1100e- 11,830.424 __ _ _ r Mobile ; 4.6325 i 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 1 0.1790 2.7153 ; 11,431.7201 0.4042 4 003 3 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 1.00OOe- 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- ; 0.0230 6.00OOe- i 0.0243 004 1 005 005 005........................; 005 005 005 �: ....................:.....................................: ..................................... .............. .................. . ...................*...................................... .............. ........................ ................... ................... Energy ; 0.0356 0.3232 1 0.2715 i 1.9400e- t S0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 ; i 387.8324 1 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 ; 003 003 r __ _ _ r Mobile ; 4.6325 i 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 1 0.1790 2.7153 ; 11,431.7201 0.4042 11,440.207 r r r 0 r 3 Total 7.4148 12.5187 49.90080.1448 9.4919 0.2187 9.7107 2.5363 0.2036 2.7399 0.4116 7.1100e- 11,830.424 111,819.575 4 003 3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NB10-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5i 5: 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name I Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition :Demolition ;10/2/2017 :11/24/2017 5 40 ....................................................................I ........................................................... 2 Site Preparation }Site Preparation ;11/27/2017 :12/1/2017 . 5: 5 ; ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. .............................................................. 3 :Grading :Grading :12/4/2017 :12/15/2017 5 10 ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- ................ .............................................................. 4 ;Building Construction :Building Construction ;1/2/2018 ::1/4/2019 5 264 ...................................................................................................................................' ........................... ........................... 5 :Paving :Paving :1/7/2019 ::1/18/2019 ...................T.' ----------------- 5: 10 .............................................................. ............................................................................... — — 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5i 5: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 78,750; Non -Residential Outdoor: 26,250 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition ;Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.001 811 0.73 ........................................................................... ......................................... ............................................... ............................. ............................... .................................... ..................................... Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 : 8.00:: 255:: 0.40 .................................................................................................................................... Demolition ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ............................................................................... 3: .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Site Preparation .Graders1...................................................................... ; r ............................................ .................................. .................................... 8.00:: 1741: ..................................... 0.41 .......................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... Scrapers . ............................................................................. 1 .................................... 8.001 3611 ..................................... 0.48 ........................................................................... Site Preparation ......................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 7.001 971 0.37 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... ;Graders ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.00:: 174:: ..................................... 0.41 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... i Rubber Tired Dozers . ........................................................................ 1 .................................... 8.00 255 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Grading ......................................................... . ... iTractors/Loaders/Backhoes i . .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 7.001 971 0.37 .......................................................................... Building Construction i ..................................................................... Cranes . .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 8.00 2261 0.29 .......................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................................................................ .................................... ..................................... Building Construction Forklifts 2:: 7.00:: 891 0.20 .................................................................................................................................................. Building Construction :Generator Sets r ............................................................................... .................................... 8.00:: 84:: 1 ..................................... 0.74 .......................................................................... Building Construction ...................................................................... . ............................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 .................................... 6.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Building Construction ......................................... ............................. ;Welders . ..................................... ............................................................................................................. 3 8.00 46: 0.45 ........................................................................... Paving ................................................................. ;Cement and Mortar Mixers ............................................................................... .................................... 8.001: 9: ..................................... 0.56 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Pavers ............................................................................... 1 .......................................................................... 8.001 1251 0.42 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... ;Paving Equipment . ......................................................................... ................................... 8.00: 130:: 0.36 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Rollers ............................................................................... 2:: .................................... 8.001: 80:: ..................................... 0.38 ........................................................................... Paving P ....................................................................... Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . ........................................................................ 1 ................................... .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 .......................................................................... Architectural Coating ...................................................................... 'Air Compressors .................................... 6.00: 78:: ..................................... 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 51 13.00; 0.00; 172.00'• 14.70: 6.90; 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ........................ Site Preparation 3 8.00; 0.00': ........................... 0.00: .............................. 14.70; 6.90: -� 20.00; LD Mix ' HDT_Mix HHDT ...................................................--------------------------------r---------------------------............................ Grading 4i 10.00; ;..........................�---------------------..............................-------------------------r----...................................................................................... 0.00: 0.00; 14.70; 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix :HDTMix HHDT ........................ Building Construction 8 r 34.00 ;.......................... 17.001 0.00 .. 14.70 ........................ :.. ... 6.90: . 20.00 LID Mix ..,. HDT_Mix ... HHDT ........................... Paving 6 ....................................................... 15.00 0.001 . 0.00; 14.70 6.90; -------------------------- 20.00 LID Mix "HDT_Mix '...... ,............ HHDT .............................................................................. .................................. ---------- ...................... -------------------------- Architectural Coating 1: 7.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: ...................... 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix ...................... ; HDT_Mix ..................... : HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.9323 1 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 1 0.1412 0.0000 0.0000 .: . Off -Road ,. 2.7216 i 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i I 1.6062 I 1.6062 i i 1.5022 : 1.5022 2,457.4682: 0.6235 : 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 17777.6-235 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0695 1.0804 0.7995 3.1700e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0920 0.0205 0.0157 0.0363 314.3095 1 2.2200e- i 314.3562 003 003 ..............................i .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i : ; 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 I I i EE W orker fl 0.0488 0.0613 0.7644 1.8400e- i 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 148.7114 7.3200e- 148.8651 003 003 003 003 Total 0.1183 1.1417 1.5639 5.0100e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2385 0.0591 0.0168 0.0759 463.0208 9.5400e- 463.2212 003 1 1 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9323 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 0.1412 ; 0.0000 ; I 0.0000 �: ; : ; i Off -Road ; 2.72161 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i 1 1.6062 1 1.6062 1 1 1.5022 1.5022 ; i 2,457.46821 0.6235 2,470 5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 12,457.46821 0.6235 1 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0695 1.0804 0.7995 3.1700e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0920 0.0205 0.0157 0.0363 314.3095 i 2.2200e- i 314.3562 V 003 003 ..............................� .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i : ; 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 .............................. I I `......................................'....................+.................. i EE a...................`...................'...................`...................1................... Worker «...................'.........................................................;...................'...................'................... �? 0.0488 0.0613 0.7644 1.8400e- i 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 148.7114 7.3200e- 148.8651 003 003 003 003 Total 0.1183 1.1417 1.5639 5.0100e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2385 0.0591 0.0168 0.0759 463.0208 9.5400e- 463.2212 003 1 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 I 1.3967 1.3967 I 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 ..'... ..'... ...'... ...'... 0.7474 W orker ,; 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- i 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 004 ii 003 Total 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 i 1.3967 1.3967 i 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................,;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 ..'... ..'... ...'... ...'... 0.6448 W orker ,; 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- i 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 004 ii 003 Total 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 1 004 003 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 0.0000 ...1 .................. .... ;....;.... Off -Road 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 1 5550 ° 1 5550 1 4306 14306 2,104.57371 0.6448 i �, 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................,;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 i i E 1.4306 .............................. ...............I ............. ............. ............. .............. .............. 0.6448 W orker �? 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- i 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 0.0000 ...1 .................. .... ;....;.... Off -Road 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 1 5550 ° 1 5550 1 4306 14306 2,104.57371 0.6448 i �, 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 i i E 1 1.1992 .............................. ...............I ............. ............. ............. .............. .............. W orker �? 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- i 0.1118 9.00OOe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 2,327.6664 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- 0.1118 9.00OOe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 003 004 004 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; � � i 2,317.2089; 0.4980 i 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1216 1.2261 1.5168 3.6900e- 0.1063 0.0203 0.1266 0.0303 0.0187 0.0490 358.5267 i 2.5400e- 003 003 «.....................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r..............................I................ ...[358.5801 ................. W orker ,; 0.1151 0.1454 1.8159 4.8100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 374.4655 0.0178 374.8387 '1 003 003 003 ii Total 0.2367 1.3716 3.3327 8.5000e- 0.4863 0.0233 0.5096 0.1311 0.0214 0.1525 732.9923 0.0203 733.4188 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; i 2,317.2089: 0.4980 i � � 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 1 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1216 1.2261 1.5168 3.6900e- 0.1063 0.0203 0.1266 0.0303 0.0187 0.0490 358.5267 i 2.5400e- 0.0249 003 003 1.0846 «.....................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r..............................I................ ...[358.5801 ................. W orker ,; 0.1151 0.1454 1.8159 4.8100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 374.4655 0.0178 374.8387 1 2,299.7816 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,309.8005 Total 0.2367 1.3716 3.3327 8.5000e- 0.4863 0.0233 0.5096 0.1311 0.0214 0.1525 732.9923 0.0203 733.4188 003 1 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1152 1.1308 1.4598 3.6700e- 0.1063 0.0193 0.1256 0.0303 0.0177 0.0480 351.5617 i 2.4900e- 0.0249 003 003 1.0846 «......................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... I................ ...[351.6140 r............................................... W orker 0.1059 0.1334 1.6689 4.8000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 360.2693 0.0166 360.6186 1 2,299.7816 003 003 003 2,309.8005 Total 0.2211 1.2642 3.1288 8.4700e- 0.4863 0.0222 0.5085 0.1311 0.0205 0.1515 711.8310 0.0191 712.2326 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1152 1.1308 1.4598 3.6700e- 0.1063 0.0193 0.1256 0.0303 0.0177 0.0480 351.5617 i 2.4900e- 0.0176 003 003 0.7225 «......................................,......................................,...................1.........................................................°...................1....................+..................:.........................................................1...................[351.6140 r............................................... W orker 0.1059 0.1334 1.6689 4.8000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 360.2693 0.0166 360.6186 1 003 003 003 Total 0.2211 1.2642 3.1288 8.4700e- 0.4863 0.0222 0.5085 0.1311 0.0205 0.1515 711.8310 0.0191 712.2326 003 1 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road :i 1.2310 i 12.4141 i 11.7009 0.0176 0.72250.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 ; 11,722.2285I' 0.5342 + 1,733.4458 ................... ................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................... i..................;...................-..................{...................�................. ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;.................... ; ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0176 0.7225 ..............................«......................................;......................................;................. �;.............. .............+..................:............................................................................�................... 0.6658 Worker ,; 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 l 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 1 003 003 I 003 ii 003 Total 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road :i 1.2310 i 12.4141 i 11.7009 0.0176 0.72250.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 ; 11,722.2285I' 0.5342 + 1,733.4458 ................... ..............................'. ........................................................................................................................................................................... i..................;...................-..................{...................�................. ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;.................... ; ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- ..............................«......................................;......................................;................. �;.............. .............+..................:............................................................................�................... 0.1288 Worker ,; 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 l 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 281.4481 003 003 I 003 ii 003 281.9473 Total 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 48.6675 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 } i 0.0000 0.0000 r................ .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............................�..................�.'.................i.................................................�................ .............. ................................... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ............. Off -Road ; 0.2664 1.8354 i 1.8413 12.9700e- i i 0.1288 i 0.1288 1 i 0.1288 0.1288 ; i 281.4481 i 0.0238 i 281.9473 ;i 003 ; .i Total 48.9339 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- i `................... ............................................................................................................................................................................ '....................+......................................'...................'................... «.: , ................... W orker ; 0.0218 0.0275 i 0.3436 9.9000e- i 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 281.9473 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 003 Total 0.0218 0.0275 0.3436 9.9000e- 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 004 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 48.6675 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 } i 0.0000 0.0000 r................ .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............................�..................�.'.................i.................................................�................ .............. ................................... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ............. Off -Road ; 0.2664 1.8354 i 1.8413 12.9700e- i i 0.1288 i 0.1288 1 i 0.1288 0.1288 ; i 281.4481 i 0.0238 i 281.9473 ;i 003 ; .i Total 48.9339 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day ; Mitigated ; 4.6325 12.1954 49.6185 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 , 0 3 ; .: Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. ■: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ■ 0 3 i `................... ............................................................................................................................................................................ '....................+.................. «.: a...................'...................'................... , ................... W orker ; 0.0218 0.0275 i 0.3436 9.9000e- i 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 Total 0.0218 0.0275 0.3436 9.9000e- 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 004 004 1 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day ; Mitigated ; 4.6325 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 0.1790 2.7153 ■ 11,431.7201 0.4042 111,440.207 , 0 3 ; .: Unmitigated ; 4.6325 12.1954 49.6185 0.1428 9.4919 0.1941 9.6861 2.5363 0.1790 2.7153 ; :11,431.720; 0.4042 :11,440.207 ■E ■ 0 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW . 1,142.00 i......._164.00 76.00 ; 2,871,853 ; 2,871,853 ..................Office .Park .......................................................;. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru i. 450.30 450.30 450.30 ............................................................................................................ 616,260 616,260 Total 1,592.30 614.30 526.30 3,488,113 3,488,113 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by W Office Park I 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.0048.00 3 119.00 ; 82 ; 15 ; 3 ..............................:................................................................................. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 .......................... ............................................................ 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category s Use Ib/day PM10 Ib/day Total NaturalGas ;1 0.0356 1 0.3232 1 0.2715 1.9400e- i 0.0246 1 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 1 387.8324E 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 Mitigated ;1 003 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day 1 003 003 r........................................ ore w/o Drive1 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 005 +� i E E E TL.... �; ` ; `.........................................................1........................................R...................................... '...................`...................................... ..............................1.................r......................................1...................'...................` ..................1................... Office Park 1 3268.49 :I 0.0353 ; 0.3204 ; 0.2692 1 1.9200e- 0.0244 i 0.0244 I I 0.0244 i 0.0244 ; 1384.5286 , 7.3700e- , 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 ; 003 003 .............................. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ....................................... ................................. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. `. NaturalGas ; 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 E 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 E 0.0246 0.0246 ; E 387.8324E 7.4300e- E 7.1100e- E 390.1927 Unmitigated ;E 387.8324 003 7.1100e- 390.1927 ; 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst 28.0822 3E 3.000Oe- E 2.7500e- E 2.3100e- E 2.000Oe- E 1 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- 1 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- ; 1 3.3038 6.000Oe- E 6.000Oe- 3.3239 ore w/o Drive1 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 005 +� i E E E TL.... �; ` ; `.........................................................1........................................R...................................... '...................`...................................... ..............................1.................r......................................1...................'...................` ..................1................... Office Park 1 3268.49 :I 0.0353 ; 0.3204 ; 0.2692 1 1.9200e- 0.0244 i 0.0244 I I 0.0244 i 0.0244 ; 1384.5286 , 7.3700e- , 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 ; 003 003 Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 7767 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- I ; Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst i 0.0280822:: 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- 3.3038 6.000Oe- I 6.000Oe- 1 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 TM... : 1i ...................• i i i i i ............................f.................................................................................................................. ................... j................... ................... .................... ;...............................................................................;................... •................... Office Park i 3.26849 41 0.0353 i 0.3204 0.2692 1.9200e- i i 0.0244 I 0.0244 i i 0.0244 i 0.0244 , 1384.5286 1 7.3700e- i 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 003 003 .... Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 ........... 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 003 004 005 005 003 003 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.7467 i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- 0.0243 ; 004 005 I 1............... 005 005 005 i 005 .... .............. .............. ...... --- I.................1............... -----------------i............... .............. ........... Unmitigated ; 2.7467 1.000Oe- '• 0.0108 0.0000 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 ; 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 0.0000 .............................. :...................:...................:...................:...................:................... :................... :................... :................... :................... :..................... F ................... ................... j................... ................... ................... ;................... Consumer ; 2.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products.............. ..............i:................... ..............:...................°...................I...................I... I.. ;..... I.. .......... .............. ............... ... .. .............. .............. .............;................... Landscaping ;i 1.0300e- 1.00001- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00001- 4.00001- 4.00001- , 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 1 0.0243 Consumer .i 003 004 005 005 005 1 005 005 t Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 ; 4.00001- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.00001- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 005 005 005 005 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Coating........... �.... �.... ..............i:................... .........................................................;....................... ............. ;... ...�.... .. .. ...... * .............. -- ....... ....................................... ............. Consumer ; 2.0790 1 I I i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r r Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 ; 0.0230 i 6.000Oe- 0.0243 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 ; r 005 Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:03 AM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 100.00 1000sgft 2.30 100,000.00 0 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru ; 5.00 ; 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2019 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Architectural Coating - From PD, following SCAQMD guide for interior/exterior areas, added mitigation of low VOC paint CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ; ConstArea_Nonresidentlal_Exterior 52,500.00 26,250.00 i........................................................................... .. ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 157,500.00 78,750.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF—Nonresidential—Exterior 250.00 50.00 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential _Interior 250.00 50.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_ Residential_ Exterior 100.00 0.00 i ......................... .................................................................................................................................. E...................................................................... tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 50.00 0.00 ..............................................................................i.............................................................................................................................................................:...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 i.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 264.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 .. i........................................................................................................................................................ ;... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase ; NumDays ; 6.00 10.00 r tblConstructionPhase i NumDays 3.00 5.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... ......................................................................... ................................................................ tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/20/2018 1/4/2019 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/19/2019 1/21/2019 tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 12/16/2017 1/2/2018 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;.................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 12/2/2017 12/4/2017 tblConstructionPhase : PhaseStartDate 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/25/2017 11/27/2017 tblGrading ; AcresOfGrading 5.00 3.00 .............................................................................. i............................................................................................................................................................ ...................................................................... tblGrading ; AcresOfGrading 7.50 4.50 ...........................................................................i........................................................................................................................................................ tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear ; 2014 2019 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8444 i 28.6644 22.4954 0.0294 i 6.4520 1.6245 i 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 i 4.8057i ; 2,910.5016; 0.7519 i 0.0000 12,926.2924 .............................. ................................................................................................................................................................ :................... :.................... ,...................;................... ;....................................... 2018 i ; ; 3.1497 21.9753 19.1758 0.0331 0.4863 1.2746 1.7609 0.1311 1.2208 1.3519 ; i 13 023.8672 0.5184 0.0000 3 034.7530 .............. 7 . ................... ...................I .............. I................... I................ �... �... �... i.............................. `.................................. .............................. .............. ............. .............. ............. ...............................+.................. �i...................'................... j ..'... .. ...`... .. ...'... .. .........'................... 2019 ,i 48.9561 20.0839 I 18.5175 0.0330 0.4863 1.1070 1.5934 0.1311 1.0605 1.1915 :i 2,986.1525 0.5415 0.0000 12,997.5239 Total 54.9502 70.7235 60.1888 0.0955 1 7.4247 4.0061 11.3622 3.6363 3.8004 7.3491 2019 8,920.5213 1.8118 1 0.0000 8,958.5693 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8444 i 28.6644 I 22.4954 I 0.0294 6.4520 1 1.62458.0079 3.3742 1.5191 4.8057 „ 2,910.5016: 0.7519 + 0.0000 2,926.2924 ...........................la............... .............. 7 . ................... ...................I .............. *..................:...................j J...................�.... ............. ............. 2018 ; 3.1497 i 21.9753 r 19.1758 I 0.0331 0.4863 1 1.2746 1.7609 0.1311 1.2208 1.3519 ; 13,023.86721 0.5184 r 0.0000 3,034.7530 r r ................... • ;................... ............ ....'------------------ ....•..... r ; r 2019 ; 48.9561 i 20.0839 .: 18.5175 0.0330 0.4863 1.1070 1.5934 1 0.1311 1.0605 1.1915 ' 2,986.15251 0.5415 ' r 0.0000 2,997.5239 Total 54.9502 70.7235 60.1888 0.0955 7.4247 4.0061 11.3622 3.6363 3.8004 7.3491 ;777718 0.0000 8,958.5693 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM ROG NO CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 1.00OOe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- I 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 0.0230 6.00OOe- 0.0243 4.00OOe- 004 005 005 005 005 005 ..................................................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.................... .: ,....................................... ;................... ;............... .... Energy .� 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 : 387.8324 i 7.4300e- � 7.1100e- 390.1927 005 r 003 003 003 .............................. .. ...`... .. �... ...'... .. �... i.................. .'................... I..... .............. ................... '................. ............. .............. ............. ...............................+..................i......................................'..................................................... Mobile ;i 4.7806 12.7941 49.4611 0.1357 9.4919 0.1949 9.6869 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 10,888.054 0.4046 1 10,896.551 Energy ii 6 t 9 0.0246 0.0246 ; i 387.8324 1 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- Total 7.5629 13.1174 49.7434 0.1376 9.4919 0.2195 9.7115 2.5363 0.2043 2.7406 ..... 2.5363 0.1797 11,275.909 0.4121 7.1100e- 11,286.768 r r r 6 r 9 Total 7.5629 13.1174 49.7434 0.1376 9.4919 9 9.7115 003 9 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 I 1.00OOe- I 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- ; 0.0230 6.00OOe- i 0.0243 004 I I 005 005 005 005 005 1 1 .............. .................... *...................................... ......................................................... Energy ; 0.0356 0.3232 1 0.2715 i 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 ; i 387.8324 1 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 ' ; 003 003 ; .................................................. Mobile r ; 4.7806 i 12.7941 ........ • ....;................... ............ 49.4611 0.1357 i 9.4919 0.1949 i 9.6869 ..... 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 r ' , 10,888.054; 0.4046 10,896.551 r r r 6 r 9 Total 7.5629 13.1174 49.7434 0.1376 9.4919 0.2195 9.7115 2.5363 0.2043 2.7406 7.1100e- 1777.4121 003 9 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NB10-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5i 5: 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name I Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition :Demolition ;10/2/2017 :11/24/2017 5 40 ....................................................................I ........................................................... 2 Site Preparation }Site Preparation ;11/27/2017 :12/1/2017 . 5: 5 ; ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. .............................................................. 3 :Grading :Grading :12/4/2017 :12/15/2017 5 10 ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- ................ .............................................................. 4 ;Building Construction :Building Construction ;1/2/2018 ::1/4/2019 5 264 ...................................................................................................................................' ........................... ........................... 5 :Paving :Paving :1/7/2019 ::1/18/2019 ...................T.' ----------------- 5: 10 .............................................................. ............................................................................... — — 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/25/2019 5i 5: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 78,750; Non -Residential Outdoor: 26,250 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition ;Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.001 811 0.73 ........................................................................... ......................................... ............................................... ............................. ............................... .................................... ..................................... Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 : 8.00:: 255:: 0.40 .................................................................................................................................... Demolition ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ............................................................................... 3: .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Site Preparation .Graders1...................................................................... ; r ............................................ .................................. .................................... 8.00:: 1741: ..................................... 0.41 .......................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... Scrapers . ............................................................................. 1 .................................... 8.001 3611 ..................................... 0.48 ........................................................................... Site Preparation ......................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 7.001 971 0.37 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... ;Graders ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.00:: 174:: ..................................... 0.41 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... i Rubber Tired Dozers . ........................................................................ 1 .................................... 8.00 255 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Grading ......................................................... . ... iTractors/Loaders/Backhoes i . .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 7.001 971 0.37 .......................................................................... Building Construction i ..................................................................... Cranes . .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 8.00 2261 0.29 .......................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................................................................ .................................... ..................................... Building Construction Forklifts 2:: 7.00:: 891 0.20 .................................................................................................................................................. Building Construction :Generator Sets r ............................................................................... .................................... 8.00:: 84:: 1 ..................................... 0.74 .......................................................................... Building Construction ...................................................................... . ............................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 .................................... 6.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Building Construction ......................................... ............................. ;Welders . ..................................... ............................................................................................................. 3 8.00 46: 0.45 ........................................................................... Paving ................................................................. ;Cement and Mortar Mixers ............................................................................... .................................... 8.001: 9: ..................................... 0.56 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Pavers ............................................................................... 1 .......................................................................... 8.001 1251 0.42 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... ;Paving Equipment . ......................................................................... ................................... 8.00: 130:: 0.36 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Rollers ............................................................................... 2:: .................................... 8.001: 80:: ..................................... 0.38 ........................................................................... Paving P ....................................................................... Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . ........................................................................ 1 ................................... .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 .......................................................................... Architectural Coating ...................................................................... 'Air Compressors .................................... 6.00: 78:: ..................................... 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 51 13.00; 0.00; 172.00'• 14.70: 6.90; 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ........................ Site Preparation 3 8.00; 0.00': ........................... 0.00: .............................. 14.70; 6.90: -� 20.00; LD Mix ' HDT_Mix HHDT ...................................................--------------------------------r---------------------------............................ Grading 4i 10.00; ;..........................�---------------------..............................-------------------------r----...................................................................................... 0.00: 0.00; 14.70; 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix :HDTMix HHDT ........................ Building Construction 8 r 34.00 ;.......................... 17.001 0.00 .. 14.70 ........................ :.. ... 6.90: . 20.00 LID Mix ..,. HDT_Mix ... HHDT ........................... Paving 6 ....................................................... 15.00 0.001 . 0.00; 14.70 6.90; -------------------------- 20.00 LID Mix "HDT_Mix '...... ,............ HHDT .............................................................................. .................................. ---------- ...................... -------------------------- Architectural Coating 1: 7.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: ...................... 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix ...................... ; HDT_Mix ..................... : HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.9323 1 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 1 0.1412 0.0000 0.0000 .: . Off -Road ,. 2.7216 i 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i I 1.6062 I 1.6062 i i 1.5022 : 1.5022 2,457.4682: 0.6235 : 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 17777.6-235 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0731 1.1195 0.9225 3.1600e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0921 0.0205 0.0158 0.0363 313.5615 1 2.2500e- i 313.6088 003 003 ..............................i .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ..............................«---------------- : ; 1 �;...................,...................................... :................... ................... --....................................... ;.................. ................... ...................°......................................1................... W orker ;................... ,; 0.0497 0.0673 0.7017 1.7200e- 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 139.4719 7.3200e- 139.6256 1 '1 003 003 003 ii 003 Total 0.1229 1.1868 1.6242 4.8800e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2386 0.0591 0.0169 0.0759 453.0334 9.5700e- 453.2345 003 1 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9323 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 0.1412 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; : ; i I.. ...................:............................................................................. ...............:.....................................:.......................................i..................:...................• Off -Road ; 2.7216 1 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i 1 1.6062 1 1.6062 1 1 1.5022 1.5022 ; I 2,457.46821 0.6235 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 j 12,457.46821 0.6235 1 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0731 1.1195 0.9225 3.1600e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0921 0.0205 0.0158 0.0363 313.5615 i 2.2500e- i 313.6088 V 003 003 ..............................� .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ..............................«------------------....................,......................................;...................:...................................... : ; i �; --....................................... ;....................................... ...................°......................................1................... Worker ,; 0.0497 0.0673 0.7017 1.7200e- 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 139.4719 7.3200e- 139.6256 '1 003 003 003 ii 003 Total 0.1229 1.1868 1.6242 4.8800e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2386 0.0591 0.0169 0.0759 453.0334 9.5700e- 453.2345 003 1 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 I 1.3967 1.3967 I 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0238 0.9545 ; 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 .............................. ..........................................................+...................................... ... •.. .................................. ...« , W orker . 0.0306 00414 i 0.4318 0.0894 7.2000e- 00901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85. 450e- 85.9235 004 004 ii 003003 Total 0.0306 0.0414 0.4318 1.0600e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85.8289 4.5000e- 85.9235 003 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 0.1031 0.0000 0.1031 ; 0.0000 0.0000 �: ; ; ......................................................... .............. ..... ..... ..................................... Off -Road ; 2.5289 i 28.6230 i 17.1310 I 0.0238 1.3967 1.3967 1.2850 1 1.2850 ; ;2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0206 6.3402 ; 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 .............................. ..........................................................+...................................... ... •.. .................................. ...« , W orker . 0.0306 00414 i 0.4318 0.0894 7.2000e- 00901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85. 450e- 85.9235 004 004 ii 003003 Total 0.0306 0.0414 0.4318 1.0600e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85.8289 4.5000e- 85.9235 003 004 1 004 003 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; ° 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Off -Road ; 2.6973 I 28.1608 i 18.9679 I 0.0206 i i 1.5550 i 1.5550 i I 1.4306 I 1.4306 ; i2,104.5737i 0.6448 i 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................,;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... i ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 �' I I :...................................... 4.7752 ............... .............. -------------------'. ..................... . ,...................I... ..:.....,...................................... ................... ................... W orker �? 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- i 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 0.0000 ...1 .................. .... ;....;.... Off -Road 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 1 5550 ° 1 5550 1 4306 14306 2,104.57371 0.6448 i �, 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; i .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... i ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2511 1.2511 �' I I :...................................... ............... .............. -------------------'. ..................... . ,...................I... ..:.....,...................................... ................... ................... W orker �? 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- i 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 004 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; i 2,317.2089: 0.4980 i � � 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 1 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... : ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... : Vendor �� 0.1324 1.2557 1.8514 3.6600e- 0.1063 0.0205 0.1268 0.0303 0.0189 0.0491 r 355.5062 2.6200e- 355.5612 : 003 r : 003 .............................. �: i «......................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r I................... .... ............... W orker ,; 0.1169 0.1596 1.6607 4.5100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 351.1522 0.0178 351.5253 '1 003 003 003 ii Total 0.2494 1.4152 3.5121 8.1700e- 0.4863 0.0235 0.5098 0.1311 0.0216 0.1527 706.6583 0.0204 707.0866 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; i 2,317.2089: 0.4980 i � � 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 1 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... : ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... : Vendor �� 0.1324 1.2557 1.8514 3.6600e- 0.1063 0.0205 0.1268 0.0303 0.0189 0.0491 r 355.5062 2.6200e- 355.5612 0.0249 : 003 r : 003 .............................. �: i «......................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r I................... .... ............... W orker ,; 0.1169 0.1596 1.6607 4.5100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 351.1522 0.0178 351.5253 1 2,299.7816 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,309.8005 Total 0.2494 1.4152 3.5121 8.1700e- 0.4863 0.0235 0.5098 0.1311 0.0216 0.1527 706.6583 0.0204 707.0866 003 1 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : : : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,299.7816 0.4771 .: : : : Vendor �� 0.1252 1.1574 1.7906 3.6500e- 0.1063 0.0195 0.1258 0.0303 0.0179 0.0482 r 348.5863 2.5700e- 348.6404 0.0249 : : 003 r : 003 1.0846 �: i ...................°...................I....................+..................:.........................................................I...................................... .................................................................................................I...................................... r W orker ,; 0.1075 0.1463 1.5221 4.5000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 337.7846 0.0166 338.1339 1 2,299.7816 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,309.8005 Total 0.2327 1.3037 3.3127 8.1500e- 0.4863 0.0224 0.5087 0.1311 0.0206 0.1517 686.3710 0.0192 686.7743 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : : : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: : : : Vendor �� 0.1252 1.1574 1.7906 3.6500e- 0.1063 0.0195 0.1258 0.0303 0.0179 0.0482 r 348.5863 2.5700e- 348.6404 0.0176 : : 003 r : 003 0.7225 �: i ...................°...................1....................+..................:.........................................................1...................................... ............................................................................. .................... 1................... ................... r W orker ,; 0.1075 0.1463 1.5221 4.5000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 337.7846 0.0166 338.1339 1 '1 003 003 003 ii Total 0.2327 1.3037 3.3127 8.1500e- 0.4863 0.0224 0.5087 0.1311 0.0206 0.1517 686.3710 0.0192 686.7743 003 1 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road „ 1.2310 i 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 , 11,722.2285' 0.5342 1,733.4458 .............................. ii �. ......................................i..................:...................-..................{....................... .................................. ..................:........................................................................ 1 11 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: ; 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; i .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... i :,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 �: 1 0.6658 0.6658 1 ...............1 ...............: .............. ............. .. .............. ---------------- '. ,.................... ....................:...,..................:......................................................... ...................................... Worker �? 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.340, 149.1767 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.3400e- 149.1767 003 003 1 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road :i 1.2310 i 12.4141 i 11.7009 0.0176 0.72250.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 ; 11,722.2285I' 0.5342 + 1,733.4458 ................... ................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................... i..................;...................-..................{...................�................. ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; i .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... i :,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- �: I 0.1288 ...............I ...............: .............. ............. .. .............. ---------------- '. ,.................... ....................:...,..................:......................................................... ...................................... Worker �? 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.340, 149.1767 281.9473 003 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.3400e- 149.1767 003 003 1 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 48.6675 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 } i 0.0000 0.0000 r................ .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............................�..................�.'.................i.................................................�................ .............. ................................... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ............. Off -Road ; 0.2664 1.8354 i 1.8413 12.9700e- i i 0.1288 i 0.1288 1 i 0.1288 0.1288 ; i 281.4481 i 0.0238 i 281.9473 ;i 003 ; .i Total 48.9339 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 W orker ,; 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- i 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 281.9473 004 004 004 ii 003 003 Total 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 004 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 48.6675 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 } i 0.0000 0.0000 r................ .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............................�..................�.'.................i.................................................�................ .............. ................................... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ............. Off -Road ; 0.2664 1.8354 i 1.8413 12.9700e- i i 0.1288 i 0.1288 1 i 0.1288 0.1288 ; i 281.4481 i 0.0238 i 281.9473 ;i 003 ; .i Total 48.9339 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 : Mitigated 91 4.7806 12.7941 49.4611 0.1357 9.4919 0.1949 9.6869 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9 ................... ........................................ t............... ..... .... W orker ,; 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- i 0.0782 6.00OOe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 0.1357 9.4919 004 004 004 ii 003 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 ' Total 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- 0.0782 6.00OOe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 6 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 004 004 1 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day : Mitigated 91 4.7806 12.7941 49.4611 0.1357 9.4919 0.1949 9.6869 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 10,888.054; 0.4046 110,896.551 .: : 6 9 ................... ........................................ t............... ..... .... . ... ................... Unmitigated ; 4.7806 '• 12.7941 49.4611 0.1357 9.4919 0.1949 9.6869 2.5363 0.1797 2.7160 ' :10,888.054:: 0.4046 ::10,896.551 6 9 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW . 1,142.00 i......._164.00 76.00 ; 2,871,853 ; 2,871,853 ..................Office .Park .......................................................;. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru i. 450.30 450.30 450.30 ............................................................................................................ 616,260 616,260 Total 1,592.30 614.30 526.30 3,488,113 3,488,113 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by W Office Park I 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.0048.00 3 119.00 ; 82 ; 15 ; 3 ..............................:................................................................................. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 .......................... ............................................................ 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category s Use Ib/day PM10 I Ib/day Total NaturalGas ;1 0.0356 1 0.3232 1 0.2715 1.9400e- i 0.0246 1 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 1 387.8324E 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 Mitigated ;1 003 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day 1 003 003 r........................................ 003 003 003 :.. : : .......................................:...................:................. ..............;.........................................................;...................;....................*..................:......................................I......................................................... Pharmacy/Drugst E 28.0822 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- , 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- , 2.1000e- 2.1000e- ; 3.3038 , 6.000Oe- , 6.000Oe- 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 1 003 1 005 1 004 1 004 004 004 ; 005 005 TL... . Total 0.0356 .............................. ... ...:. ...... . ............. ..................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ............. ............. `. NaturalGas ; 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 E 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 E 0.0246 0.0246 ; E 387.8324E 7.4300e- E 7.1100e- E 390.1927 Unmitigated ;E 7.4300e- 003 390.1927 ; 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Office Park E 3268.49 3E 0.0353 E 0.3204 E 0.2692 E 1.9200e- E 1 0.0244 E 0.0244 0.0244 E 0.0244 ; 1 384.5286 E 7.3700e- E 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 003 003 :.. : : .......................................:...................:................. ..............;.........................................................;...................;....................*..................:......................................I......................................................... Pharmacy/Drugst E 28.0822 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- , 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- , 2.1000e- 2.1000e- ; 3.3038 , 6.000Oe- , 6.000Oe- 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 1 003 1 005 1 004 1 004 004 004 ; 005 005 TL... . Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- I ; Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst i 0.0280822:: 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- 3.3038 6.000Oe- I 6.000Oe- 1 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 TM... : 1i ...................• i i i i i ............................f.................................................................................................................. ................... j................... ................... .................... ;...............................................................................;................... •................... Office Park i 3.26849 41 0.0353 i 0.3204 0.2692 1.9200e- i i 0.0244 I 0.0244 i i 0.0244 i 0.0244 , 1384.5286 1 7.3700e- i 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 003 003 .... Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 ........... 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 003 004 005 005 003 003 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.7467 i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- 0.0243 ; 004 005 I 1............... 005 005 005 i 005 .... .............. .............. ...... --- I.................1............... -----------------i............... .............. ........... Unmitigated ; 2.7467 1.000Oe- '• 0.0108 0.0000 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 ; 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 0.0000 .............................. :...................:...................:...................:...................:................... :................... :................... :................... :................... :..................... F ................... ................... j................... ................... ................... ;................... Consumer ; 2.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products.............. ..............i:................... ..............:...................°...................I...................I... I.. ;..... I.. .......... .............. ............... ... .. .............. .............. .............;................... Landscaping ;i 1.0300e- 1.00001- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00001- 4.00001- 4.00001- , 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 1 0.0243 Consumer .i 003 004 005 005 005 1 005 005 t Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 ; 4.00001- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.00001- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 005 005 005 005 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Coating........... �.... �.... ..............i:................... .........................................................;....................... ............. ;... ...�.... .. .. ...... * .............. -- ....... ....................................... ............. Consumer ; 2.0790 1 I I i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r r Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 ; 0.0230 i 6.000Oe- 0.0243 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 ; r 005 Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 27 Date: 2/2/2016 9:01 AM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 17 Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru 38.00 1000sgft 0.87 38,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Vehicle Trips - adjusted per traffic report Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2016 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblProjectCharacteristics Operationaffear 2014 2016 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblVehicleTrips ST TR 90.06 32.32 ..............................................................................i. ...................................................................... tblVehicleTrips SU—TR 90.06 32.32 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................y.................................................................................................................................................... tblVehicleTrips WD TR 90.06 32.32 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 ; 6.4000e- 6.3600e- 3.7500e- 1.000Oe- 2.9000e- 3.9000e- 6.8000e- 14.000Oe- 3.5000e- 3.9000e- 0.4583 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4611 0.4611 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 005 004 004 .i 004 Total 6.4000e- 6.3600e- 3.7500e- 1.000Oe- 2.9000e- 3.9000e- 6.8000e- 4.000Oe- 3.5000e- 3.9000e- 3.5000e- 3.9000e- 0.4583 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4611 0.4611 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 005 004 004 004 004 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 ; 6.4000e- i 6.3600e- 3.7500e- i 1.000Oe- i 2.9000e- 3.9000e- i 6.8000e- i 4.000Oe- i 3.5000e- i 3.9000e- ; 0.4583 1.3000e- i 0.0000 0.4611 0.00 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 005 004 004 ; 004 0.00 Total 6.4000e- 6.3600e. 3.7500e- 1.000Oe- 2.9000e- 3.9000e- 6.8000e- 4.000Oe- 3.5000e- 3.9000e- 0.4583 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4611 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 005 004 004 004 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area ; 0.1814 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 9.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.000Oe- '° ; 004 004 003 ; .............................. ....................:...................:....................................................................................................................... :................... :.................... ;.......................................: ;................... Ener 4.2000e- 3.8200e- 3.2100e- 2.000Oe- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 4.1570 8.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 4.1823 9Y 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 ':...................°...................i...................i...................i................ ............. ...... .............. ............... ' ................:...................i................. .... ............. +.. Mobile ;l 0.6619 1.2748 5.5996 9.6600e- 0.6368 0.0156 0.6524 0.1704 0.0144 0.1847 769.5030 0.0341 0.0000 770.2197 �; Waste ; i i : 0.0000 E 0.0000 i I 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 23.1958 1 1.3708 1 0.0000 1 51.9832 .............................. �. Water ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8493 0.0872 2.0600e- : 3.3196 ' 003 ii Total 0.8437 1.2786 5.6033 9.6800e- 0.6368 0.0159 0.6527 0.1704 0.0146 0.1850 797.7060 1.4923 2.1400e- 829.7059 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area ; 0.1814 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 9.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.000Oe- '° ; 004 004 003 ; .............................. ....................:...................:....................................................................................................................... :................... :.................... ;.......................................: ;................... Ener 4.2000e- 3.8200e- 3.2100e- 2.000Oe- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 4.1570 8.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 4.1823 9Y 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 ':...................°...................i...................i...................i................ ............. ...... .............. ............... ' ................:...................i................. .... ............. �.. Mobile ;l 0.6619 1.2748 5.5996 9.6600e- 0.6368 0.0156 0.6524 0.1704 0.0144 0.1847 769.5030 0.0341 0.0000 770.2197 0.00 �; Waste ; i i : 0.0000 E 0.0000 i I 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 23.1958 1 1.3708 1 0.0000 1 51.9832 0.00 .............................. r. Water ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8493 0.0872 2.0600e- : 3.3196 ' 003 ii Total 0.8437 1.2786 5.6033 9.6800e- 0.6368 0.0159 0.6527 0.1704 0.0146 0.1850 797.7060 1.4923 2.1400e- 829.7059 003 003 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name I Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week I Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation :1/14/2017 :1/16/2017 5i 1 i Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating - sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Off road Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation :Graders 1 8.00: 174; 0.41 ......................................................................................................................................... . ............................ .............................................................. Site Preparation ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00: 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Off road Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Bio- CO2 Count Number Number Number Length Length Length I Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation 2 5.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00: LID Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ;I 2.7000e- 0.0000 2.7000e- 3.000Oe- I 0.0000 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 r 004 004 005005 : , Off -Road .; 6.3000e- 6.3400e- 3.6200e- 1 0.0000 1 1 3.9000e- 3.9000e- i 3.5000e- I3.5000e- 0.4336 1.3000e- i 0.0000 0.4364 004 003 003 1 004 004 004 004 004 ii Total 6.3000e- 6.3400e- 3.6200e- 0.0000 2.7000e- 3.9000e- 6.6000e- 3.000Oe- 3.5000e- 3.8000e- 0.4336 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4364 004 003 003 004 004 004 005 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 3.2 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 EII .............................. .� ..........................................................................................................p.................\............................................................................................. i .............. ...............r................p...................................J................... Vendor ; 0.0000: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �• r 3.6200e- �: 1 i I i I...................'...................`...................'...................'j­T.*6*6*66'e- i...................`...................'...................`................ .............................. «...................'............................................................................ ......+.................. ...................... W orker 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.4000e- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0247 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0247 1.3000e- 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 0.4364 Total 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.4000e- 0.0000 3.00010e- 0.0000 3.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 004 0.0247 0.0000 0.0000 0.0247 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ,; 12.7000e- 1 0.0000 2.7000e- 3.000Oe- 0.0000 3.000Oe- ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004004 005 005 1......................................................... .............................. r...................................... ................... ................... ............. ...................... ................ ....................... ..................... .................... i .................. i................... .................. 6.3400e- 3.6200e- 0.0000 i3.9000e- 3.9000e- 3.5000e- 3.5000e-; 0.4336 Is 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4364Off-Road 004 003 003 004 004 004 004 ; 004 Total 6.3000e- 6.3400e- 3.6200e- 0.0000 2.7000e- 3.9000e- 6.6000e- 3.000Oe- 3.S000e- 3.8000e- 1 0.4336 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4364 004 003 003 004 004 004 005 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 3.2 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Mitigated ; 0.6619 1 1.2748 5.5996 9.6600e- i 0.6368 0.0156 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �• I .: .............................. �: i I i r............................................................................................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... I................ ...................... W orker ; 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.4000e- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 0.0247 0.0000 0.0000 0.0247 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 5.5996 Total 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.4000e- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 0.0247 0.0000 0.0000 0.0247 ; 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 1 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated ; 0.6619 1 1.2748 5.5996 9.6600e- i 0.6368 0.0156 i 0.6524 0.1704 0.0144 0.1847 769.5030 i 0.0341 0.0000 770.2197 003 .: Unmitigated ; 0.6619 1.2748 5.5996 9.6600e- 0.6368 0.0156 0.6524 0.1704 0.0144 0.1847 ; 769.5030 0.0341 0.0000 '• 770.2197 003 ; CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru 1,228.00 1,228.00 1228.00 1,680,585 1,680,585 Total 1,228.00 j 1,228.00 1,228.00 1,680,585 1,680,585 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.513363: 0.060352: 0.180146: 0.139338: 0.042155: 0.006672: 0.015739: 0.030749: 0.0019281 0.0025031 0.004351: 0.0005931 0.002111 2.2 AnffKYDetail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 416 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.513363: 0.060352: 0.180146: 0.139338: 0.042155: 0.006672: 0.015739: 0.030749: 0.0019281 0.0025031 0.004351: 0.0005931 0.002111 2.2 AnffKYDetail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 77900 i 4.2000e- i 3.8200e- 3.2100e- 2.000Oe- i 2.9000e- 12.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- MT/yr 4.1823 ore w/o Drive 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 005 Total 4.2000e- 3.8200e- 3.2100e- 2.000Oe- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- Electricity ;i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated 004 004 004 004 .............................. M...................j................... ....................................... t......................................�............... ............. .............. .................................... i.....................................i...................�................... .................... Electricity ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated:i .................M......................................i...................;...................... ....... ;................. .............. .............. .............. ...................................................... ';...................;...................;...................'.. NaturalGas ; 4.2000e- i 3.' 2 e- 3.2100e- 2.000Oe- i 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- ' 4.1570 ° 8.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 1 4.1823 Mitigated ;i 004 i 003 003 I 005 004 004 004 004 I 005 005 1 �' :.................. I i... .................E........................ e.................................. ............. NaturalGas ; 4.2000e- i 3.8200e- i 3.2100e- i 2.000Oe- E 2.9000e- E 2.9000e- E E 2.9000e- i 2.9000e- ; 4.1570 E 8.000Oe- i 8.000Oe- i 4.1823 Unmitigated ; 004 003 r 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; � 005 005 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 77900 i 4.2000e- i 3.8200e- 3.2100e- 2.000Oe- i 2.9000e- 12.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- ; 4.1570 i 8.000Oe- i 8.000Oe- 4.1823 ore w/o Drive 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 005 Total 4.2000e- 3.8200e- 3.2100e- 2.000Oe- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 4.1570 8.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 4.1823 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ore w/o Drive TN. s Use Total 0.0000 I PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst i 77900 4.2000e- 3.8200e- 3.2100e- 2.000Oe- 2.9000e- i 2.9000e- I 2.9000e- i 2.9000e- 4.1570 8.000Oe- i 8.000Oe- I 4.1823 ore w/o Drive TM.. 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 Total 4.2000e- 3.8200e- 3.2100e- 2.000Oe- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 2.9000e- 4.1570 8.000Oe- 8.000Oe- 4.1823 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kW h/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 486400 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ore w/o Drive TN. Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ElectricityTotal Use CO2 CH4 I I N20 CO2e Land Use kW h/yr i MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst ore w/o Drive 486400 3i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust I PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I I N20 I CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.1814 1: 0.0000 1 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.40OOe- 0 0000 0.0000 1.00OOe- 004 r 04 003 .............................. ................... ............... ....... .. ............ ................... ................... ................... .................... I .................. . ................... ................... ................... ! .................. ! ................... Unmitigated 0.1814 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.000Oe- 004 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ; 0.0440 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..................................................:...................:...................:..................•;...................;..................•;...................;...................;...................;....................' �: ° ;................... Consumer �: 0.1373 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products : Landscaping �: :... I... ..I... ..:... j ..:... ...:... ..:... ...:... ..:... :.......................................................................................................................................... ; 5.000Oe- 0.0000 15.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ....... ................ ...1................... 9.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.000Oe- Products ': 005 004 1 i 004 003 Total 0.1814 0.0000 5.0000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.000Oe- 9.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.000Oe- ; 005 r 004 004 003 Total 0.1814 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 0.0000 0.0000 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ; 0.0440 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating............. �: ............. .....................................................I' ...................:..................... ..................�.... ;... �.... ............ ............ ............. *1 �.... �.... ............. Consumer ; 0.1373 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ;i ................................................ r ....:................... :... ................ ;................. ............ r Landscaping ;; 5.000Oe- i 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 i 0.0000 0.0000 ; 9.4000e- i 0.0000 0.0000 1.000Oe- ; 005 r 004 ; 004 r 003 Total 0.1814 0.0000 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.4000e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 004 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 0.8493 i 0.0872 i 2.0600e- 3.3196 I 003 .............................. I ................... ................... ................... ................... Unmitigated 0.8493 0.0872 i 2.0600e- i 3.3196 Pharmacy/Drugst 2.67701 003 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 2.67701 0.8493 i 0.0872 i 2.0600e- 3.3196 ore w/o Drive 1.64075 i 003 Total -F 0.8493 0.0872 2.0600e- 3.3196 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Yea Indoor/OutTotal CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr door Use I I Unmitigated 23.1958 1.3708 0.0000 Land Use Mgal i MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 2.67701 0.8493 i 0.0872 2.0600e- i 3.3196 ore w/o Drive 1.64075 003 Total —7 0.8493 0.0872 2.0600e- 3.3196 003 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Yea Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 23.1958 1: 1.3708 1 0.000051.9832 .............................. I ................... ................... ................... ................... Unmitigated 23.1958 1.3708 0.0000 51.9832 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 114.27 i 23.1958 i 1.3708 0.0000 i 51.9832 ore w/o Drive TM.. Total 23.1958 1.3708 0.0000 51.9832 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I Land Use tons MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 114.27 991 23.1958 i 1.3708 i 0.0000 51.9832 ore w/o Drive TN. Total 23.1958 1.3708 0.0000 51.9832 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 17 Date: 2/1/2016 12:07 PM 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 12 Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru 38.00 1000sgft 0.87 38,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Vehicle Trips - adjusted per traffic report Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2016 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblProjectCharacteristics Operationaffear 2014 2016 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblVehicleTrips ST TR 90.06 32.32 ..............................................................................i. ...................................................................... tblVehicleTrips SU—TR 90.06 32.32 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................y.................................................................................................................................................... tblVehicleTrips WD TR 90.06 32.32 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 1.2882 I 12.7088 7.5259 0.0100 i 0.5861 0.7709 i 1.3571 0.0721 0.7093 i 0.7813 .i 1,013.06301 0.2957 I 0.0000 1,019.2725 Total 1.2882 12.7088 7.5259 0.0100 0.5861 0.7709 1.3571 0.0721 0.7093 0.7813 0.7813 1 1,013.0630 0.2957 0.0000 1,019.2725 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 1.2882 i 12.7088 i 7.5259 0.0100 0.5861 1 0.7709 1.3571 1 0.0721 0.7093 1 0.7813 ; 1,013.06301 0.2957 i 0.0000 1,019.2725 Total 1.2882 12.7088 7.5259 0.0100 0.5861 0.7709 1.3571 0.0721 0.7093 0.7813 11,013.06301 0.2957 0.0000 1,019.2725 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 0.9941 4.00OOe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- E 1.00OOe- 8.3200e- 2.00OOe- E 8.8100e- 1.00OOe- '° 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 005 003 ..................................................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.................... ; ; ................... Ener 9Y �� 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- � 25.1088 4.8000e- 4.6000e- 25.2616 003 005 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 ..............................�i...................'................... E................... E................... ................... E................ .............. ............. ...............................+..................i...................................... E................... E.................................. Mobile ;1 3.6989 6.5805 29.3467 0.0551 i 3.5634 0.0855 3.6490 0.9521 0.0786 1.0307 14,840.5741 0.2068 4,844.9178 Energy ii 0.0176 i 1.3000e- E E 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- E i 1.5900e- E 1.5900e- ; E 25.1088 i 4.8000e- E 4.6000e- Total 4.6953 6.6014 29.3682 003 0.0871 3.6506 0.9521 0.0802 1.0323 0.2073 4.60OOe- 4,870.1882 11 ; 3.6989 6.5805 29.3467 0.0551 3.5634 0.0855 3.6490 73.5634 1.0307 ; 4,840.5741E 0.2068 4,844.9178 Total 4.6953 14,865.6912 29.3682 004 1 0.0871 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 0.9941 4.00OOe- 3.9800e- i 0.0000 i 1.00OOe- I 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- ; i 8.3200e- 2.00OOe- i 8.8100e- �; 005 003 : 005 005 005 005 003 005 003 ..............................i:...................; ........................................................;................... .............. ..................... ..................... ................... .................... *...................................... -------------.......................................... ............. Energy ;i 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 i 1.3000e- E E 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- E i 1.5900e- E 1.5900e- ; E 25.1088 i 4.8000e- E 4.6000e- 25.2616 003 004 003 003 003 003 ; 004 004 r r Mobile ; 3.6989 6.5805 29.3467 0.0551 3.5634 0.0855 3.6490 0.9521 0.0786 1.0307 ; 4,840.5741E 0.2068 4,844.9178 Total 4.6953 6.6014 29.3682 0.0553 3.5634 0.0871 3.6506 0.9521 0.0802 1.0323 0.2073 4.6000e- 4,870.1882 14,865.69121 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name I Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation :1/14/2017 :1/16/2017 5 1 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation ;Graders 1 i 8.00: 174; 0.4 ........................................................................................................................................... . ............................ .............................................................. Site Preparation ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00: 97: 0.3' Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation ; 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM 3.2 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.5303 1 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 il 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: M............... .......... .......... .............. ............*..................:.........................................................I............................00 Off -Road ,; 1.2694 12.6852 7.2319 9.3300e- i I 0.7705 I 0.7705 i i 0.7089 i 0.7089 i 955.8663 0.2929 962.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 i 0.0000 ..............................r.. . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .................i. .............. .................................................................. Total 1.2694 12.6852 7.2319 9.3300e- 0.5303 0.7705 1.3007 0.0573 0.7089 0.7661 Total 955.8663 0.2929 0.0236 962.0167 7.1000e- 0.0559 4.5000e- 0.0563 003 4.1000e- 0.0152 57.1967 2.8200e- 57.2558 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 M............... .......... .......... .............. ............*..................:.........................................................I............................00 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.. . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .................i. .............. .................................................................. ............. Worker ; 0.0188 0.0236 0.2940 i 7.1000e- I 0.0559 i 4.5000e- I 0.0563 0.0148 i 4.1000e- 0.0152 ; 57.1967 2.8200e- i 57.2558 004 004 004 .: ; 003 Total 0.0188 0.0236 0.2940 7.1000e- 0.0559 4.5000e- 0.0563 0.0148 4.1000e- 0.0152 57.1967 2.8200e- 57.2558 004 004 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM 3.2 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.5303 1 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 il 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: M............... .......... .......... .............. ............*..................:.........................................................I............................00 Off -Road ,; 1.2694 12.6852 7.2319 9.3300e- i I 0.7705 I 0.7705 i i 0.7089 i 0.7089 i 955.8663 0.2929 962.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 i 0.0000 ..............................r.. . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .................i. .............. .................................................................. Total 1.2694 12.6852 7.2319 9.3300e- 0.5303 0.7705 1.3007 0.0573 0.7089 0.7661 Total 955.8663 0.2929 0.0236 962.0167 7.1000e- 0.0559 4.5000e- 0.0563 003 4.1000e- 0.0152 57.1967 2.8200e- 57.2558 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 M............... .......... .......... .............. ............*..................:.........................................................I............................00 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.. . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .................i. .............. .................................................................. ............. Worker ; 0.0188 0.0236 0.2940 i 7.1000e- I 0.0559 i 4.5000e- I 0.0563 0.0148 i 4.1000e- 0.0152 ; 57.1967 2.8200e- i 57.2558 004 004 004 .: ; 003 Total 0.0188 0.0236 0.2940 7.1000e- 0.0559 4.5000e- 0.0563 0.0148 4.1000e- 0.0152 57.1967 2.8200e- 57.2558 004 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 3.6989 6.5805 29.3467 0.0551 3.5634 0.0855 ; : 3.6490 0.9521 0.0786 1.0307 i 4,840.5741 i 0.2068 ' 14,844.9178 ..............................r :... ..:... ..:... :... :... .............................. .............. .......................................... ...............................+................ ............. ............... .............. ................ i............... Unmitigated ; 3.6989 6.5805 29.3467 0.0551 3.5634 0.0855 3.6490 0.9521 0.0786 1.0307 ; :4,840.5741: 0.2068 :4,844.9178 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru 1,228.00 1,228.00 1228.00 1,680,585 1,680,585 Total 1,228.00 1,228.00 1,228.00 1,680,585 1,680,585 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.513363: 0.060352: 0.180146: 0.139338: 0.042155: 0.006672: 0.015739: 0.030749: 0.0019281 0.0025031 0.004351: 0.0005931 0.00211' g.g Apff%y,petail Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 8.40 6.90 to 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 i 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.513363: 0.060352: 0.180146: 0.139338: 0.042155: 0.006672: 0.015739: 0.030749: 0.0019281 0.0025031 0.004351: 0.0005931 0.00211' g.g Apff%y,petail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 I Exhaust PM2.5 IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category s Use Ib/day PM10 I Ib/day Total NaturalGas ; 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 25.1088 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- 25.2616 Mitigated ; 003004 003 003 003 003 004 004 0.0209 0.0176 i 1.3000e- i 1.5900e- 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- ; 25.1088 i 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- 25.2616 ore w/o Drive 003 TN... 004 .........................r............... .............. ............. ....................................... ....................................... ............... ..............................+................ .. .............. ............ NaturalGas ; 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- ; 25.1088 i 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- i 25.2616 Unmitigated ; 003 1.5900e- 004 003 003 003 003 ; 004 004 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst 213.425 i 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 i 1.3000e- i 1.5900e- 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- ; 25.1088 i 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- 25.2616 ore w/o Drive 003 TN... 004 003 003 003 003 ; 004 004 � Total 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 25.1088 4.8000e- 4.6000e- 25.2616 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use Ib/day I PM10 PM10 I Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 ° 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- I i 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst i 0.213425 3 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- I 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 25.1088 4.8000e- 4.6000e- I 25.2616 ore w/o Drive TM.. 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 Total 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 25.1088 4.8000,0- 4.6000e- 25.2616 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 003 8.8100e- ; .: 004 003 003 003 005 003 003 003 004 004 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 0.9941 ° 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- ; i 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- .• ,; 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 005 003 Unmitigated ; 0.9941 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- ; 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- ; .: 005 003 005 005 005 005 ; 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.2413 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ; 0.0000 ..............................:...................:...................:...................:..................•;...................;..................•;...................;...................;...................;.................... Coating........... ..............i:................... I ;................... Consumer 0.7524 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ............. Consumer; 0.7524 i ...:... ..:... .... . i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Landscaping ; 3.9000e- 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- ° 8.8100e- Products �i 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 005 003 Total 0.9941 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 r 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- r 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- Landscaping 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1 8.8100e- 8.3200e- i 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- 005 003 003 005 005 005 005 005 005 003 005 005 4.000Oe- 003 005 1.000Oe- 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.2413 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Coating........... ..............i:................... .........................................................;....................... ............. .. �.... ;... ...�.... .............. * .. ...... �.... -- ....... ....................................... ............. Consumer; 0.7524 i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r r Landscaping ; 3.9000e- i 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1 ; 8.3200e- i 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- ; 004 005 r 003 005 005 005 005 ; r 003 005 1 003 Total 0.9941 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000O 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:06 PM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 12 Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru 38.00 1000sgft 0.87 38,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Vehicle Trips - adjusted per traffic report Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2016 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblProjectCharacteristics Operationaffear 2014 2016 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblVehicleTrips ST TR 90.06 32.32 ..............................................................................i. ...................................................................... tblVehicleTrips SU—TR 90.06 32.32 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................y.................................................................................................................................................... tblVehicleTrips WD TR 90.06 32.32 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 1.2885 i 12.7111 7.5018 0.0100 i 0.5861 0.7709 i 1.3571 0.0721 0.7093 i 0.7813 .i i 1,009.50931 0.2957 I 0.0000 1,015.7189 Total 1.2885 12.7111 7.5018 0.0100 0.5861 0.7709 1.3571 0.0721 0.7093 0.7813 0.7813 11,009.50931 0.2957 0.0000 1,015.7189 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 1.2885 i 12.7111 i 7.5018 0.0100 0.5861 0.7709 1.3571 0.0721 0.7093 1 0.7813 ; 1,009.5093; 0.2957 i 0.0000 1,015.7189 Total 1.2885 12.7111 7.5018 0.0100 0.5861 0.7709 1.3571 0.0721 0.7093 0.7813 11,009.50931 0.2957 1 0.0000 1,015.7189 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 0.9941 4.00OOe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- i 1.00OOe- 8.3200e- 2.00OOe- i 8.8100e- 1.00OOe- '° 005 003 005 005 005 005 ; : 003 005 003 ..................................................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.................... : : : ................... Ener 9Y i i ; �� 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- I 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- E i � 25.1088 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- 25.2616 003 005 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 .............................. i...................'................... I................... I.................. �................... I................ .............. ............. ...............................+.................. i................... I...................'...................`.................................. Mobile ;1 3.8818 6.8774 30.7974 0.0524 3.5634 0.0863 3.6498 0.9521 0.0794 1.0314 4,607.8726 0.2072 1 4,612.2231 Energy ;i 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 i 1.3000e- i 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- I i 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- ; i 25.1088 i 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- Total 4.8782 6.8984 30.8190 003 0.0879 3.6514 0.9521 0.0810 1.0330 •...................•...................;................... ............ 0.2077 4.6000e- 4,637.4935 Mobile 11 30.7974 0.0524 3.5634 0.0863 3.6498 0.9521 0.0794 73.5634 ' 4,607.8726: 0.2072 4,612.2231 Total 4.8782 6.8984 1 14,632.9897 0.0879 004 1 0.9521 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 0.9941 4.00OOe- 3.9800e- i 0.0000 i 1.00OOe- I 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- ; i 8.3200e- 2.00OOe- i 8.8100e- �; 005 003 : 005 005 005 005 003 005 003 ..............................i:...................; ........................................................;................... .............. ..................... ..................... ................... .................... *...................................... -------------.......................................... ............. Energy ;i 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 i 1.3000e- i 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- I i 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- ; i 25.1088 i 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- 25.2616 003 004 003 003 003 003 ; 004 004 ................................................ r .... •...................•...................;................... ............ r Mobile 3.8818 6.87 ; 74 .: 30.7974 0.0524 3.5634 0.0863 3.6498 0.9521 0.0794 1.0314 ' 4,607.8726: 0.2072 4,612.2231 Total 4.8782 6.8984 30.8190 0.0526 3.5634 0.0879 3.6514 0.9521 0.0810 1.0330 0.2077 4.6000e- 4,637.4935 14,632.98971 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name I Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation :1/14/2017 :1/16/2017 5 1 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation ;Graders 1 i 8.00: 174; 0.4 ........................................................................................................................................... . ............................ .............................................................. Site Preparation ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00: 97: 0.3' Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation ; 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM 3.2 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.5303 1 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 il 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: M............... .......... .......... .............. ............*..................:.........................................................I............................00 Off -Road ,; 1.2694 12.6852 7.2319 9.3300e- i I 0.7705 I 0.7705 i i 0.7089 i 0.7089 i 955.8663 0.2929 962.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 i 0.0000 ..............................r.. . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .................i. .............. .................................................................. Total 1.2694 12.6852 7.2319 9.3300e- 0.5303 0.7705 1.3007 0.0573 0.7089 0.7661 Total 955.8663 0.2929 0.0259 962.0167 6.6000e- 0.0559 4.5000e- 0.0563 003 4.1000e- 0.0152 53.6430 2.8200e- 53.7022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 M............... .......... .......... .............. ............*..................:.........................................................I............................00 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.. . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .................i. .............. .................................................................. ............. Worker ; 0.0191 0.0259 0.2699 16.6000e- I 0.0559 i 4.5000e- I 0.0563 0.0148 i 4.1000e- 0.0152 ; 53.6430 2.8200e- i 53.7022 004 004 004 .: ; 003 Total 0.0191 0.0259 0.2699 6.6000e- 0.0559 4.5000e- 0.0563 0.0148 4.1000e- 0.0152 53.6430 2.8200e- 53.7022 004 004 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM 3.2 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.5303 1 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 il 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: M............... .......... .......... .............. ............*..................:.........................................................I............................00 Off -Road ,; 1.2694 12.6852 7.2319 9.3300e- i I 0.7705 I 0.7705 i i 0.7089 i 0.7089 i 955.8663 0.2929 962.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 i 0.0000 ..............................r.. . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .................i. .............. .................................................................. Total 1.2694 12.6852 7.2319 9.3300e- 0.5303 0.7705 1.3007 0.0573 0.7089 0.7661 Total 955.8663 0.2929 0.0259 962.0167 6.6000e- 0.0559 4.5000e- 0.0563 003 4.1000e- 0.0152 53.6430 2.8200e- 53.7022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 M............... .......... .......... .............. ............*..................:.........................................................I............................00 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.. . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .................i. .............. .................................................................. ............. Worker ; 0.0191 0.0259 0.2699 16.6000e- I 0.0559 i 4.5000e- I 0.0563 0.0148 i 4.1000e- 0.0152 ; 53.6430 2.8200e- i 53.7022 004 004 004 .: ; 003 Total 0.0191 0.0259 0.2699 6.6000e- 0.0559 4.5000e- 0.0563 0.0148 4.1000e- 0.0152 53.6430 2.8200e- 53.7022 004 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 3.8818 6.8774 30.7974 0.0524 3.5634 0.0863 ; : 3.6498 0.9521 0.0794 1.0314 i 4,607.87261 0.2072 ' 14,612.2231 ..............................r :... ..:... ..:... :... :... .............................. .............. .......................................... ...............................+................ ............. ............... .............. ................ i............... Unmitigated ; 3.8818 6.8774 30.7974 0.0524 3.5634 0.0863 3.6498 0.9521 0.0794 1.0314 ; :4,607.8726: 0.2072 :4,612.2231 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru 1,228.00 1,228.00 1228.00 1,680,585 1,680,585 Total 1,228.00 1,228.00 1,228.00 1,680,585 1,680,585 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.513363: 0.060352: 0.180146: 0.139338: 0.042155: 0.006672: 0.015739: 0.030749: 0.0019281 0.0025031 0.004351: 0.0005931 0.00211' g.g Apff%y,petail Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 8.40 6.90 to 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 i 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.513363: 0.060352: 0.180146: 0.139338: 0.042155: 0.006672: 0.015739: 0.030749: 0.0019281 0.0025031 0.004351: 0.0005931 0.00211' g.g Apff%y,petail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 I Exhaust PM2.5 IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category s Use Ib/day PM10 I Ib/day Total NaturalGas ; 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 25.1088 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- 25.2616 Mitigated ; 003004 003 003 003 003 004 004 0.0209 0.0176 i 1.3000e- i 1.5900e- 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- ; 25.1088 i 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- 25.2616 ore w/o Drive 003 TN... 004 .........................r............... .............. ............. ....................................... ....................................... ............... ..............................+................ .. .............. ............ NaturalGas ; 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- ; 25.1088 i 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- i 25.2616 Unmitigated ; 003 1.5900e- 004 003 003 003 003 ; 004 004 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst 213.425 i 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 i 1.3000e- i 1.5900e- 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- i 1.5900e- ; 25.1088 i 4.8000e- i 4.6000e- 25.2616 ore w/o Drive 003 TN... 004 003 003 003 003 ; 004 004 � Total 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 25.1088 4.8000e- 4.6000e- 25.2616 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use Ib/day I PM10 PM10 I Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 ° 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- I i 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst i 0.213425 3 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- I 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 25.1088 4.8000e- 4.6000e- I 25.2616 ore w/o Drive TM.. 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 Total 2.3000e- 0.0209 0.0176 1.3000e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 1.5900e- 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 25.1088 4.8000,0- 4.6000e- 25.2616 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 003 8.8100e- ; .: 004 003 003 003 005 003 003 003 004 004 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 0.9941 ° 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- ; i 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- .• ,; 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 005 003 Unmitigated ; 0.9941 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- ; 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- ; .: 005 003 005 005 005 005 ; 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.2413 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ; 0.0000 ..............................:...................:...................:...................:..................•;...................;..................•;...................;...................;...................;.................... Coating........... ..............i:................... I ;................... Consumer 0.7524 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ............. Consumer; 0.7524 i ...:... ..:... .... . i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Landscaping ; 3.9000e- 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- ° 8.8100e- Products �i 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 005 003 Total 0.9941 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 r 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- r 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- Landscaping 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1 8.8100e- 8.3200e- i 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- 005 003 003 005 005 005 005 005 005 003 005 005 4.000Oe- 003 005 1.000Oe- 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.2413 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Coating........... ..............i:................... .........................................................;....................... ............. .. �.... ;... ...�.... .............. * .. ...... �.... -- ....... ....................................... ............. Consumer; 0.7524 i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r r Landscaping ; 3.9000e- i 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1 ; 8.3200e- i 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- ; 004 005 r 003 005 005 005 005 ; r 003 005 1 003 Total 0.9941 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000O 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.3200e- 2.000Oe- 8.8100e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 12 Date: 2/1/2016 12:04 PM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 31 Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 100.00 1000sgft 2.30 100,000.00 0 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru ; 5.00 ; 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Vehicle Trips - Adjusted for Traffic report information Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2019 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 9.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 264.00 ..............................................................................i. E...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 5.00 i.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseEndDate 12/20/2018 1/4/2019 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;...............................................................................:...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate 1/19/2019 1/21/2019 tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate 12/16/2017 1/2/2018 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate 12/2/2017 12/4/2017 tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate ; 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/25/2017 11/27/2017 tblGrading i AcresOfGrading 5.00 3.00 .. i........................................................................... ..,... ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblGrading i AcresOfGrading 7.50 4.50 i........................................................................... ........................ tblProjectCharacteristics Operationaffear 2014 2019 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblVehicleTrips : ST TR 1.64 0.36 i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblVehicleTrips : ST TR 90.06 127.20 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblVehicleTrips SU TR 0.76 0.17 i..............................................................................;.............................................................................. ....................................................................... tblVehicleTrips SU TR 90.06 127.20 .............................................................................. i............................................................................................................................................................ ...................................................................... tblVehicleTrips WD TR 11.42 2.50 ...........................................................................i........................................................................................................................................................ tblVehicleTrips WD TR ; 90.06 127.20 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 ; 0.0769 i 0.7686 0.5915 7.6000e- i 0.0578 0.0438 i 0.1016 0.0212 0.0408 i 0.0619 i 68.6251 1 0.0161 i 0.0000 68.9641 1 7.6000e- 1 0.0578 004 1 r ; .: 0.0000 2018 ; 0.4081 2.8606 2.4913 4.3100e- 0.0621 0.1657 0.2278 0.0168 0.1587 0.1755 i ; : i 357.4677 i 0.0611 0.0000 i i003 004.........................� ..................................... .................................................'...................1...................1......................................1................ ...`... ...' .. .............. ........... ...............+.................. i............................................................................[358.7514 ............. 2019 ;i 1.2299 0.1110 0.1087 1.8000e- i 2.1200e- 6.4100e- 8.5400e- 1 5.7000e- l 6.0400e- 6.6100e- 15.3663 3.4700e- 0.0000 15.4391 �1 ; 0.4081 1 2.8606 ,i 004 003 003 003 I 004 I 003 003 003 0.1657 0.2278 0.0168 0.1587 0.1755 Total 1.7149 3.7402 3.1914 5.2500e- 0.1221 0.2159 0.3379 0.0385 0.2055 0.2440 441.4591 0.0807 0.0000 443.1546 •...................1................... 11 ------------j...................•....................*..................:................... 003 ............. 2019 ; 1.2299 0.1110 0.1087 1.8000e- i 2.1200e- 6.4100e- 8.5400e- 5.7000e- 1 6.0400e- 6.6100e- ; 1 0.0000 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 ; 0.0769 0.7686 0.5915 1 7.6000e- 1 0.0578 0.0438 0.1016 0.0212 0.0408 0.0619 ; I 68.6250 0.0161 0.0000 68.9640 '0................... ................. ... ..... 004.........................� ..................................... .......................................*..................:...................................... .................... 2018 �1 ; 0.4081 1 2.8606 1 2.4913 1 4.3100e- 0.0621 0.1657 0.2278 0.0168 0.1587 0.1755 357.4674 1 0.0611 0.0000 358.7511 ;i 003 .............................. .i ------------------- j................... •................... •...................1................... •...................1...................' ------------j...................•....................*..................:................... •...................1.................................... ............. 2019 ; 1.2299 0.1110 0.1087 1.8000e- i 2.1200e- 6.4100e- 8.5400e- 5.7000e- 1 6.0400e- 6.6100e- ; 15.3663 i 3.4700e- 0.0000 15.4391 r 004 1 003 003 003 004 003 003 ; r 003 Total 1.7149 3.7402 3.1914 5.2500e- 0.1221 0.2159 0.3379 0.0385 0.2055 0.2440 441.4587 0.0807 0.0000 443.1542 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction r Waste ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 r r 49.1446 r r r r Water 1 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 5.7504 0.5906 0.0140 r. r r. r r. r 22.4767 Total 0.8895 0.9250 3.6117 8.8600e- 0.5682 0.0168 0.5850 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area ; 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ;I 2.6100e- I 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- ; 005 003 ; 003 Is 005 003 .. ___ __ r................... r ______________ ___ __ .......... _ Energy ; 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0496 3.5000e- i 4.4800e- i 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- ; 64.2100 i 1 2300e- 1 1800e- 64.6008 003 i 004 i 003 r .; 003 003 003 003 003 : i : Mobile ; 0.3818 0.8660 1 3.5608 1 8.5100e- : 0.5682 0.0123 1 0.5805 0.1521 0.0113 0.1634 ; i 618.8510 i 0.0234 1 0.0000 619.3432 003 ; r. r Waste ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 r r 49.1446 r r r r Water 1 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 5.7504 0.5906 0.0140 r. r r. r r. r 22.4767 Total 0.8895 0.9250 3.6117 8.8600e- 0.5682 0.0168 0.5850 0.1521 0.0158 0.1679 710.7431 1.9113 0.0151 755.5680 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area ; 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 2.7500e- '° 005003 003 005 003 ; ; ; .: i i ; Ener 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0496 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- I 4.4800e- i 4.4800e- 64.2100 1.2300e- i 1.1800e- 64.6008 9Y �� � . i ° ; i . 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 ... �; _ I I i E e �... �................ ............. �................ Mobile ; 0.3818 0.8660 3.5608 8.5100e- 0.5682 0.0123 0.5805 0.1521 0.0113 0.1634 618.8510 0.0234 0.0000 619.3432 ii 003 �; ................... .. ..... Waste ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 49.1446 : ; 0.00 t ................... t................... t.... 1................... •.... +.. 1....................... ...... .................... :................... ° ............. ; Water ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 E 5.7504 i 0.5906 0.0140 22.4767 ii Total 0.8895 0.9250 3.6117 8.8600e- 0.5682 0.0168 0.5850 0.1521 0.0158 0.1679 710.7431 1.9113 0.0151 755.5680 003 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 :Demolition :Demolition ;10/2/2017 11/24/2017 5E 40 ................;............................................................. 2 :Site Preparation :Site Preparation ;11/27/2017 :12/1/2017 5 5 ............................................................. ..................................................... ........................... ........................... ............................................. .............................................................. 3 :Grading :Grading 112/4/2017 :12/15/2017 5 10 4 ;Building Construction ;Building Construction ;1/2/2018 1/4/2019 5 264 ...............;............................................................. 5 ;Paving ;Paving ;1/7/2019 1/18/2019 5 10 ...............;............................................................. 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/21/2019 ::1/31/2019 5 9 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 157,500; Non -Residential Outdoor: 52,500 (Architectural Coating — sqft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition ;Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.001 81 0.73 ........................................................................... ............................. ............................... ......................................... ............................................... .................................... ..................................... Site Preparation :Graders i 1 : 8.00:: 174:: 0.41 ............................................................................................................................................ Demolition ;Rubber Tired Dozers ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.001 2551 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... Scrapers r ............................................ .................................. 1 .................................... 8.00:: 3611: ..................................... 0.48 .......................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes r . ............................................................................. 1 .................................... 7.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Demolition ......................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes .......................................................................................................................................................... 3: 8.001 971 0.37 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... ;Graders ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.00:: 174:: ..................................... 0.41 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... i Rubber Tired Dozers . ........................................................................ 1 .................................... 8.00 255 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Grading ......................................................... . iTractors/Loaders/Backhoes i .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 7.001 971 0.37 .......................................................................... Building Construction i ..................................................................... Cranes . .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 8.00 2261 0.29 .......................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................................................................ .................................... ..................................... Building Construction Forklifts 2:: 7.00:: 891 0.20 .................................................................................................................................................. Building Construction :Generator Sets r ............................................................................... .................................... 8.00:: 84:: 1 ..................................... 0.74 .......................................................................... Building Construction ...................................................................... . ............................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 .................................... 6.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Building Construction ......................................... ............................. ;Welders . ..................................... ............................................................................................................. 3 8.00 46: 0.45 ........................................................................... Paving ................................................................. ;Cement and Mortar Mixers ............................................................................... .................................... 8.001: 9: ..................................... 0.56 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Pavers ............................................................................... 1 .......................................................................... 8.001 1251 0.42 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... ;Paving Equipment . ......................................................................... ................................... 8.00: 130:: 0.36 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Rollers ............................................................................... 2:: .................................... 8.001: 80:: ..................................... 0.38 ........................................................................... Paving P ....................................................................... Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . ........................................................................ 1 ................................... .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 .......................................................................... Architectural Coating ...................................................................... 'Air Compressors .................................... 6.00: 78:: ..................................... 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 51 13.00; 0.00; 172.00'• 14.70: 6.90; 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ........................ Site Preparation 31 8.00: 0.00': ........................... 0.00: .............................. 14.70: 6.90: -� 20.00; LD Mix ' HDT_Mix HHDT ...................................................--------------------------------r---------------------------............................ Grading 4i 10.00; ;..........................�---------------------..............................-------------------------r----...................................................................................... 0.001 0.00; 14.70; 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix :HDTMix HHDT ........................ Building Construction 81 r 34.00: ;.......................... 17.001 0.00 .. 14.70: ........................ :.. ... 6.90: . 20.00: LID .. HDT_Mix ........................... HHDT ........................... Paving 6 ....................................................... 15.00 0.001 . 0.00; 14.70 6.90; -------------------------- 20.00 LID Mix "HDT_Mix '...... ,............ HHDT .............................................................................. .................................. ---------- ...................... -------------------------- Architectural Coating 1: 7.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: ...................... 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix ...................... : HDT_Mix ..................... : HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ; 0.0187 0.0000 0.0187 2.8200e- I 0.0000 2.8200e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; ; : ; 003 003 i ; .................... .......... t•• ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................,...................;................... ....................................... Off -Road ; 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0321 0.0321 0.0300 0.0300 44.5876 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 004 Total 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0187 0.0321 0.0508 2.8200e- 0.0300 0.0329 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 004 003 1 174.5876 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 1.4400e- 0.0228 0.0181 6.000Oe- 1.4700e- 3.4000e- 1.8200e- i 4.000Oe- I 3.1000e- 7.2000e- 5.6970 4.000Oe- i 0.0000 5.6979 : : : : : : V 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 : 005 : Off -Road ; 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 1 4.9000e- 0.0321 0.0321 0.0300 0.0300 ; i 44.5875 i 0.0113 0.0000 .: ;i 004 ; .i Vendor 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.00000.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0187 0.0321 : : i i ' ; `................... ..............................«. .................................................. .............. .............. .............. ............. ................+..................i...................;...................;................... .. ...... .. ..... ..... ..... .... ...... .............. ................... Worker ; 9.4000e- 1.3900e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 2.8500e- 2.000Oe- 2.8800e- 7.6000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- i 2.5699 1.3000e- 0.0000 2.5727 ;1 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Total 2.3800e- 0.0242 0.0325 1.000Oe- 4.3200e- 3.6000e- 4.7000e- 1.1600e- 3.3000e- 1.5000e- 8.2669 1.7000e- 0.0000 8.2706 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust; 0.0187 0.0000 0.0187 + 2.8200e- I 0.0000 I 2.8200e- ; 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 ' ii......................................................................................................................................i..................:............................................................................ ..............................r...................;..................................... . . Off -Road ; 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 1 4.9000e- 0.0321 0.0321 0.0300 0.0300 ; i 44.5875 i 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 ;i 004 ; .i Total 0.0544 0.5317 0.4174 4.9000e- 0.0187 0.0321 0.0508 2.8200e- 0.0300 0.0329 44.5875 0.0113 0.0000 44.8251 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 1.4400e- 0.0228 0.0181 6.000Oe- 1.4700e- 3.4000e- 1.8200e- i 4.000Oe- I 3.1000e- 7.2000e- 5.6970 4.000Oe- i 0.0000 5.6979 : : : : : : V 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 : 005 : Off -Road ; 6.3200e- : 0.0716 0.0428 16.000Oe- i 3.4900e- i 3.4900e- i I 3.2100e- 3.2100e- ; 5.5326 i 1.7000e- i 0.0000 .: 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .: Vendor 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.00000.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0428 6.000Oe- 2.3900e- 3.4900e- : : i i ; `................... ..............................«. .................................................. .............. .............. .............. ............. ................+..................i...................;...................;................... .. ...... .. ..... ..... ..... .... ...... .............. ................... Worker ; 9.4000e- 1.3900e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 2.8500e- 2.000Oe- 2.8800e- 7.6000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- i 2.5699 1.3000e- 0.0000 2.5727 003 ;1 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Total 2.3800e- 0.0242 0.0325 1.000Oe- 4.3200e- 3.6000e- 4.7000e- 1.1600e- 3.3000e- 1.5000e- 8.2669 1.7000e- 0.0000 8.2706 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust ; i 2.3900e- I 0.0000 2.3900e- i 2.6000e- i 0.0000 2.6000e- ; 0.00000.00 00 i 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 �:.............................................................................T................................................................................................................ Off -Road ; 6.3200e- : 0.0716 0.0428 16.000Oe- i 3.4900e- i 3.4900e- i I 3.2100e- 3.2100e- ; 5.5326 i 1.7000e- i 0.0000 5.5682 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .: Total 6.3200e- 0.0716 0.0428 6.000Oe- 2.3900e- 3.4900e- 5.8800e- 2.6000e- 3.2100e- 3.4700e- 5.5326 1.7000e- 0.0000 5.5682 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........:........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;....... ............ ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.3200e- 0.0716 ..............................« .................i ....... i ........E....................'...................`...................'...................'....................+ .0000....2.20 ..................i.`................... '.... ............... `................ .................. W orker 7.000Oe- 1. 0 1110 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 3.2100e- 005 003 004 004 005 005 i 005 Total 7.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.1100e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 003 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 1 2.3900e- 0.0000 2.3900e- 2.6000e- 0.00 2.6000 00 e- 0.0000 0.0000° 0.0000 0.0000 003 0 00 4 004 ..............................r................................i.......................................T------------......................... ................... ; ................... 3.4900e- 3.4900e- 3.2100e- 3.2100e -Off -Road 6.3200e 0.0716 0.0428 6.000Oe- 5.5325 i 1.7000e- i 0.0000 5.5681 003 005 003 003 003 003 ; 003 .: Total 6.3200e- 0.0716 0.0428 6.000Oe- 2.3900e- 3.4900e- 5.8800e- 2.6000e- 3.2100e- 3.4700e- 5.5325 1.7000e- 0.0000 5.5681 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........:........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;....... ............ ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0135 0.1408 ..............................« .................i ....... i ........E....................'...................`...................'...................'....................+ .0000....2.20 ..................i.`................... '.... ............... `................ .................. W orker 7.000Oe- 1. 0 1110 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 0.0239 005 003 004 004 005 005 i 005 Total 7.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.1100e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.1977 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1979 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr i i I � i i Fugitive Dust 0.0317 0.0000 0.0317 0.0167 0.0000 0.0167 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .................................................;...................---------................................................................................ :...................--....................................... �- Off -Road ; 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 I 1.000Oe- i 7.7800e- i 7.7800e- i I 7.1500e- 7.1500e- ; 9.5462 i 2.9200e- i 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 Total 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 1.000Oe- 0.0317 7.7800e- 0.0395 0.0167 7.15007 0.0239 9.5462 2.9200e- 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road ; 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 I 1.000Oe- i 7.7800e- i 7.7800e- i I 7.1500e- 7.1500e- ; 9.5462 i 2.92OOe- i 0.0000 �• r :... :... I... :... r W orker «... ......................................................... ...:... ...:... ..:... �? 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 , 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- ,..............................................................................................1................... 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 0.0395 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 Total 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr i i I � i i Fugitive Dust 0.0317 0.0000 0.0317 0.0167 0.0000 0.0167 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .................................................;...................---------................................................................................ :...................--....................................... �- Off -Road ; 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 I 1.000Oe- i 7.7800e- i 7.7800e- i I 7.1500e- 7.1500e- ; 9.5462 i 2.92OOe- i 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 Total 0.0135 0.1408 0.0948 1.000Oe- 0.0317 7.7800e- 0.0395 0.0167 7.15007 0.0239 9.5462 2.9200e- 0.0000 9.6076 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; • ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 �• r :... :... I... :... r W orker «... ......................................................... ...:... ...:... ..:... �? 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 , 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- ,..............................................................................................1................... 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 0.1626 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 Total 1.8000e- 2.7000e- 2.7700e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.4942 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4947 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 1 0.1626 0.1626 0.1559 0.1559 ; i 273.2778 0.0587 + 0.0000 274.5111 003 Total 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 0.1626 0.1626-70.15591 .16260.1559 0.1559 273.2778 0.0587 0.0000 274.5111 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: ...................:...................:...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................; i ;i 0.01680.1665 0.2335 4.8000e- 0.0136 2.6500e- 0.0163 3.8800e- I 2.4400e- 6.3200e- ................... ;................... ;................ ... 42.1329 3.000Oe- i 0.0000 42.1393 003 �• : : 004 003 003 003 003 r : 004 i E i 0.3771 Worker ;i 0.0143 0.0214 i 0.2215 6.000Oe- 0.0485 3.9000e- 0.0489 0.0129 3.6000e- 0.0132 42.0571 2.1000e- 0.0000 42.1011 0.1626 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 0.1559 Total 0.0311 0.1878 0.4550 1.0800e- 0.0621 3.0400e- 0.0651 0.0168 2.8000e- 0.0196 84.1900 2.4000e- 0.0000 84.2404 003 003 1 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 1 0.1626 0.1626 0.1559 0.1559 ; i 273.2774 0.0587 + 0.0000 274.5107 003 Total 0.3771 2.6728 2.0363 3.2400e- 0.1626 0.1626-70.15591 .16260.1559 0.1559 273.2774 0.0587 0.0000 274.5107 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: ...................:...................:...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................; i ;i 0.01680.1665 0.2335 4.8000e- 0.0136 2.6500e- 0.0163 3.8800e- I 2.4400e- 6.3200e- ................... ;................... ;................ ... 42.1329 3.00OOe- i 0.0000 42.1393 003 005 003 003 003 003 r �• : : 004 003 003 003 003 r : 004 i E i 5.0900e- Worker ;i 0.0143 0.0214 i 0.2215 6.00OOe- 0.0485 3.9000e- 0.0489 0.0129 3.6000e- 0.0132 42.0571 2.1000e- 0.0000 42.1011 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 2.0800e- 2.0800e- Total 0.0311 0.1878 0.4550 1.0800e- 0.0621 3.0400e- 0.0651 0.0168 2.8000e- 0.0196 84.1900 2.4000e- 0.0000 84.2404 003 003 003 1 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I 1 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 5.0900e- i 0.0376 0.0304 5.00OOe- i i 2.1700e- 2.1700e- i 2.0800e- 2.0800e- ; 4.1727 8.7000e- i 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 r � 004 Total 5.0900e- 0.0376 0.0304 5.00OOe- 2.1700e- 2.1700e- 2.0800e- 2.0800e- 4.1727 8.7000e- 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.11,111,111,11"**",.*********..........,.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................;...................;...................;................... Vendor .: . ; : i ; 2.4000e- 2.3600e- 3.4700e- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 14.000Oe- 2.5000e- i 6.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 1.000Oe- . 0.6356 0.0000 0.0000 0.6357 004 � �• 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 r .............................. �; I i i ° «...................'.........................................................•...................'......................................`...................'................... I....................+...................................... r `...................'.................................... ...................... W orker 2.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.6224 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6230 2.1700e- 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 4.4000e- 2.6600e- 6.5900e- 2.000Oe- 9.6000e- 5.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.6000e- 5.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.2580 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2587 003 004 003 003 005 004 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Im tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road ; 5.0900e- 0.0376 0.0304 5.000Oe- 2.1700e- 2.1700e- i 2.0800e- 2.0800e- ; 4.1727 8.7000e- i 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 r 004 � Total 5.0900e- 0.0376 0.0304 5.000Oe- 2.1700e- 2.1700e- 2.0800e- 2.0800e- 4.1727 8.7000e- 0.0000 4.1908 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................r.11,111,111,11"**",.*********..........,...................,...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.......................................:...................;...................;...................;...................;................... Vendor .: : ; : i ; 2.4000e- 2.3600e- 3.4700e- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 14.000Oe- 2.5000e- i 6.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.6356 0.0000 0.0000 0.6357 Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �• 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 005 005 004 r .............................. �; I i i ° «...................'.........................................................•...................'......................................`...................'................... I....................+...................................... r `...................'.................................... ...................... W orker 2.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 7.50007- 1.00007- 7.50007- 2.00007- 1.00007- 2.00007- 0.6224 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6230 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 4.4000e- 2.6600e- 6.5900e- 2.000Oe- 9.6000e- 5.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.6000e- 5.000Oe- 3.000Oe- I 1.2580 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2587 004 003 003 005 004 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road :i 6.16007- i 0.0621 0.0585 19.00007- I 3.61007- i 3.61007- 3.33007- 3.33007- ; 7.8119 2.4200e- i 0.0000 7.8628 ji 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 ..... ..... .... .............................. r .................... ..................�................ .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ................. i................................................................................... ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.1600e- 0.0621 0.0585 9.00007 3.6100e- 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- 7.8119 2.4200e- 0.0000 7.8628 003 005 1 003 1 003 I I 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; : • ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �• r 0.0621 : r ..:... ...:... ...:... ..:... ........................... ,..............................................................................................1................... W orker fl 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 7.8119 ;; 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 . 005 Total 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr • Off -Road ; 6.1600e- 1 0.0621 1 0.0585 1 9.000Oe- 1 3.6100e- I 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- ; 7.8119 I 2.4200e- + 0.0000 ttE 7.8628 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 ( I �.................... �................... �................... �: 1 1 ...................j................... i ....................................... -..................• . .................. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.1600e- 0.0621 0.0585 9.0000 3.6100e- 3.6100e- 3.3300e- 3.3300e- 7.8119 2.4200e- 0.0000 7.8628 003 005 1 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; : • ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. Vendor .: i4...................;...................;.......................................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;....................:..................:..................;...................;..................;...................; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............... 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road ; 1.2000e- 18.2600e- i 8.2900e- I 1.000Oe- : i 5.8000e- i 5.8000e- i I 5.8000e- 5.8000e- ; 1.1490 i 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 �• r : r 8.2900e- ..:... ...:... ...:... ..:... ........................... ,..............................................................................................1................... W orker fl 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 5.8000e- ;; 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 . 005 Total 2.2000e- 3.3000e- 3.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 004 0.6865 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6872 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 1 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 1.2167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I, :...........................................................i..................;...................------------- ......{...................................... r ...................: .................. ......................................................... .................. .................. ................... Off -Road ; 1.2000e- 18.2600e- i 8.2900e- I 1.000Oe- : i 5.8000e- i 5.8000e- i I 5.8000e- 5.8000e- ; 1.1490 i 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 1.1510 003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 004 Total 1.2179 8.2600e- 8.2900e- 1.000Oe- 5.8000e- 5.8000e- 5.8000e- 5.8000e- 1.1490 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.1510 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........:........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 8.2600e- .............................. �; i i i «...................'..................................................................................................................`...................'...................'....................+.................. r i...................;...................'...................`................ ...................... W orker 9.000Oe- 1.4000e- 1.4500e- 0.0000 3.5000e- 0.0000 3.5000e- 9.000Oe- 0.0000 9.000Oe- 0.2883 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2886 5.8000e- 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 Total 9.000Oe- 1.4000e- 1.4500e- 0.0000 3.5000e- 0.0000 3.5000e- 9.000Oe- 0.0000 9.0000e- 0.2883 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2886 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr ,. Archit. Coating 1.2167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I r ...................: .................. ............................................................i..................;...................------------- ............................................ ........................................................ .................. .................. ................... Off -Road ; 1.2000e- 18.2600e- i 8.2900e- I 1.000Oe- i 5.8000e- i 5.8000e- i I 5.8000e- 5.8000e- ; 1.1490 i 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 1.1510 003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 004 Total 1.2179 8.2600e- 8.2900e- 1.000Oe- 5.8000e- 5.8000e- 5.8000e- 5.8000e- 1.1490 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.1510 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 V 003 I : Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; . ; I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ..............................: .: ................... :.................................................. .........;........................................................................................................................ :...................................... ;................... ;................... ;....................................... Vendor i ; ,; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1634 ; I .............................. �; i I i «...................'..................................................................................................................`...................'...................'....................+.................. r i...................;...................'...................`................ ...................... W orker 9.000Oe- 1.4000e- 1.4500e- 0.0000 3.5000e- 0.0000 3.5000e- 9.000Oe- 0.0000 9.000Oe- 0.2883 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2886 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 Total 9.000Oe- 1.4000e- 1.4500e- 0.0000 3.5000e- 0.0000 3.5000e- 9.000Oe- 0.0000 9.0000e- 0.2883 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2886 005 004 003 004 004 005 005 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated ; 0.3818 0.8660 3.5608 8.5100e- i 0.5682 0.0123 i 0.5805 0.1521 0.0113 0.1634 618.8510 i 0.0234 0.0000 619.3432 V 003 : .: Unmitigated ; 0.3818 0.8660 3.5608 8.5100e- 0.5682 0.0123 0.5805 0.1521 0.0113 0.1634 ; 618.8510 0.0234 0.0000 619.3432 003 ; CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Office Park 250.00 i 35.90 16.64 ' 628,689 628,689 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru 636.00 636.00 636.00 870,401 870,401 Total 886.00 671.90 652.64 1,499,090 1,499,090 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by W Office Park I 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.0048.00 3 119.00 ; 82 ; 15 ; 3 ..............................:................................................................................. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 .......................... ............................................................ 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr MT/yr 5.000Oe- 4.2000e- i 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; i 0.5470 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.5503 ore w/o Drive 005 004 004005 005 005 Electricity ;i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Office Park i 1.193e i 6.4300e- 0.0585 0.0491 i 3.5000e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- ; 63.6630 1.2200e- .............................. M...................j......................................�................... t......................................'................ +006 003 ............. .............. .................t.................. i......................................i..................................................... Electricity ;I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0495 3.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 003 004 003 003 003 003 ..................M.........................................................�................. ...�....................... .....Unmitigated ............. ............. .............. .............. ............... .. } .....I......................................�...................... .............. ............. ............. NaturalGas ;I 6.4900e- i 0.0590 0.0496 , 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- ! i 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 1 64.6008 Mitigated ;I 003 i . I 004 , 003 . 003 003 003 003 i 003 1 ! ..............................! NaturalGas ; 6.4900e- i 0.0590 0.0496 i 3.5000e- E 4.4800e- E 4.4800e- E E 4.4800e- i 4.4800e- ; E 64.2100 E 1.2300e- ............. E 1.1800e- i 64.6008 Unmitigated ; 003 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst 10250 i 6.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 4.2000e- i 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; i 0.5470 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.5503 ore w/o Drive 005 004 004005 005 005 005 ; 005 005 TL .. ! Office Park i 1.193e i 6.4300e- 0.0585 0.0491 i 3.5000e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- 4.4400e- ; 63.6630 1.2200e- 1.1700e- 64.0505 +006 003 004 003 003 003 003 ; 003 003 Total 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0495 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use Pharmacy/Drugst 64000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I PM10 PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I P 0.0000 I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Pharmacy/Drugst i 10250 6.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 4.2000e- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- I 4.000Oe- I 4.000Oe- 0.5470 1.000Oe- I 1.000Oe- I 0.5503 ore w/o Drive 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 005 ,................... ........... it" ::........... f..................i...................1................... ................... I................... ................... i ...................................... j.. ................ i ....................................... yi ...................................... .......,................... ............... Office Park 1.193e :I 6.4300e- 0.0585 0.0491 3.5000e- 4.4400e- 14.4400e- I 4.4400e- I 4.4400e- 63.6630 1.2200e- I 1.1700e- 64.0505 +006 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 Total 6.4900e- 0.0590 0.0495 3.5000e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 4.4800e- 64.2100 1.2300e- 1.1800e- 64.6008 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kW h/yr MT/yr Office Park i 1.717e ;i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 +006 .; .......................................�................. Pharmacy/Drugst 64000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ore w/o Drive TN. Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Exhaust I PM10 Use Fugitive PM2.5 I I Land Use kW h/yr MT/yr Office Park i 1.717e 3i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 +006 .............................. . ................. .......................... ..... ...... ................... ................... Pharmacy/Drugst i 64000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ore w/o Drive Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust I PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.5012 i 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- I 0000e 0.0000 2.7500e- ' 005 003 003 005 003 .............................. ....... ....... ............... ................... ................... ....................................... ................... ..................... .................. ! ............ ........... .. .............. .............. Unmitigated 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- ; 005 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ; 0.1217 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ..............................:...................:...................:...................:..................•;...................;..................•;...................;...................;...................;.................... 0.0000 ° ;................... Consumer 0.3794 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products .... ..I... ...�.... ............. .. .. ...... .............. * ...1--- ........................:.............................................................................................................1................... ...:... ..:... ...:. ..:... ............. Landscaping ; 1.3000e- 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6100e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- �i 004 005 003 003 005 003 Total 0.5012 1.0000e- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.61OOe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- _ r __ 005 003 Landscaping ; 1.3000e- i 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ; 2.61OOe- i 1.000Oe- 003 005 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural ; 0.1217 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CoatingI............. ..............i:............................................................................;...................1------------......... .... ..I... ...�.... ............. .. .. ...... .............. * ...1--- I ............ ...�.... �.... ............. ............. Consumer ; 0.3794 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r _ r __ Landscaping ; 1.3000e- i 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ; 2.61OOe- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- ; 004 005 r 003 r 003 005 003 Total 0.5012 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.61OOe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7500e- 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 28 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated ; 5.7504 i 0.5906 1 0.0140 22.4767 .: Unmitigated ;1 5.7504 ` 0.5906 i 0.0140 i 22.4767 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Office Park i 17.7734 / i 5.6387 i 0.5792 1 0.0137 22.0400 10.8934 .......................................... ................... :.................. :................... Pharmacy/Drugst 10.352238 / 1 0.1118 i 0.0115 1 2.7000e- 0.4368 ore w/o Drive TN. 1 0.215888: 004 Total 5.7504 0.5906 1 0.0139 22.4767 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 29 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr door Use , ..........................I:. ............. ............. ................i............... I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Office Park i 17.7734/ Ei 5.6387 i 0.5792 i 0.0137 i 22.0400 10.8934 Pharmacy/Drugst 10.352238 / V 0.1118 i 0.0115 i 2.7000e- i 0.4368 ore w/o Drive 10.215888E 004 TM. Total 5.7504 0.5906 0.0139 22.4767 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated ; 21.9291 i 1.2960 i 0.0000 49.1446 , ..........................I:. ............. ............. ................i............... Unmitigated ; 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 '• 49.1446 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 30 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I I Land Use tons MT/yr Office Park : 93 i 18.8782 1 1.1157 0.0000 i 42.3072 .............................. .................. .................... I ................... ....................................... Pharmacy/Drugst i 15.03 3.0510 1 0.1803 0.0000 i 6.8374 ore w/o Drive Total 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 49.1446 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I I Land Use tons MT/yr Office Park 93 i 18.8782 1 1.1157 0.0000 42.3072 .............................. .................. ........... ................ ................... Pharmacy/Drugst 15.03 99:: 3.0510 0.1803 0.0000 6.8374 ore w/o Drive Total 21.9291 1.2960 0.0000 49.1446 9.0 Operational Offroad IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Days/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 31 of 31 Date: 2/1/2016 11:37 AM 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 27 Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 100.00 1000sgft 2.30 100,000.00 0 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru ; 5.00 ; 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Vehicle Trips - Adjusted for Traffic report information Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2019 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 9.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 264.00 ..............................................................................i. E...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 5.00 i.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseEndDate 12/20/2018 1/4/2019 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;...............................................................................:...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate 1/19/2019 1/21/2019 tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate 12/16/2017 1/2/2018 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate 12/2/2017 12/4/2017 tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate ; 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/25/2017 11/27/2017 tblGrading i AcresOfGrading 5.00 3.00 .. i........................................................................... ..,... ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblGrading i AcresOfGrading 7.50 4.50 i........................................................................... ........................ tblProjectCharacteristics Operationaffear 2014 2019 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblVehicleTrips : ST TR 1.64 0.36 i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblVehicleTrips : ST TR 90.06 127.20 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblVehicleTrips SU TR 0.76 0.17 i..............................................................................;.............................................................................. ....................................................................... tblVehicleTrips SU TR 90.06 127.20 .............................................................................. i............................................................................................................................................................ ...................................................................... tblVehicleTrips WD TR 11.42 2.50 ...........................................................................i........................................................................................................................................................ tblVehicleTrips WD TR ; 90.06 127.20 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8399 i 28.6607 i 22.4351 0.0295 i 6.4520 1.6245 i 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 i 4.8057 : ; 2,920.48901 0.7519 i 0.0000 12,936.2798 .............................. .: ....................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:................... :.................... ,....................................... ;................... ;................... 2018 E E : 3.137021.9316 18.9964 0.0334 0.4863 1.2744 1.7607 0.1311 1.2207 1.3517 :3,050.2011: 0.5183 0.0000 3,061.0852 2018 E..... E 1 0.1311 1.2207 1.3517 ........... ..............E..............E .............E ...... ............. .............. ... .............. ............. .......................... 2019 270.6633 20.0444 5932 1.1914 3,011.6126 0.5415 0.0000 3,022.9840 ii 2019 ; 270.6633E 20.0444 18.3336 0.0334 0.4863 1.1068 1.5932 r r r 0.1311 1.0603 Total 276.6402 70.6367 59.7652 0.0962 7.4247 4.0057 11.3618 3.6363 3.8000 7.3488 3.6363 18,982.3027 1.8117 0.0000 9,020.3490 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8399 i 28.6607 22.4351 0.0295 6.4520 1.6245 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 4.8057 2,920.4890 0.7519 i 0.0000 2,936.2798 .............................. ............................................................................ . 2018 ; 3.1370 i 21.9316 18.9964 E 0.0334 0.4863 1.2744 1 1.7607 r 1 0.1311 1.2207 1.3517 ; 13,050.2011E 0.5183 0.0000 r 3,061.0852 .................................................. r r ................. ............ r ; r 2019 ; 270.6633E 20.0444 18.3336 0.0334 0.4863 1.1068 1.5932 r r r 0.1311 1.0603 1.1914 ' 3,011.6126E 0.5415 0.0000 r r r 3,022.9840 Total 276.6402 70.6367 59.7652 0.0962 7.4247 4.0057 11.3618 3.6363 3.8000 7.3488 1 8,982.3027 1.8117 0.0000 9,020.3489 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM ROG NO CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 1.00OOe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- I 4.00OOe- i 4.00OOe- 0.0230 6.00OOe- i 0.0243 0.0000 i 4.00OOe-..4.00OOe- 004 005 005 005 005 005 ..................................................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.................... .: ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Energy i ; ; .� 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 i 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 005 r 003 003 003 .............................. i....................................... I..... ..............I...................' ....... ................................ .............. ............. .................................. i...................................... I................... '................... .................................. Mobile ;i 2.3393 5.0384 21.2067 0.0555 3.6381 0.0766 3.7147 0.9721 0.0706 1.0428 4,440.6995 0.1612 4,444.0854 ii Energy ; 0.0356 0.3232 1 0.2715 Total 5.1216 5.3617 21.4890 0.0574 3.6381 0.1012 3.7393 0.9721 0.0952 1.0674 ; 003 003 4,828.5549 0.1687 7.1100e- 4,834.3024 : 0.0555 3.6381 0.0766 3.7147 11 .. 1.0428 r ......................................° 4,440.6995 0.1612 4,444.0854 rrr rr r Total 003 5.3617 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 I 1.00OOe- I 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.00OOe-..4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- ; 0.0230 6.00OOe- i 0.0243 004 I I 005 005 005 005 005 .................................... 1 ........... .......................... 1 ............ I ...................................... ......................................................... Energy ; 0.0356 0.3232 1 0.2715 i 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 ; i 387.8324 1 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 ; 003 003 Mobile r 2.3393 i 5.0384 21.2067 : 0.0555 3.6381 0.0766 3.7147 ..................................... 0.9721 0.0706 .. 1.0428 r ......................................° 4,440.6995 0.1612 4,444.0854 rrr rr r Total 5.1216 5.3617 21.4890 0.0574 3.6381 0.1012 3.7393 0.9721 0.0952 1.0674 0.1687 7.1100e- 4,834.3024 17,828.5549 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NB10-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/31/2019 5i 9: 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name I Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition :Demolition ;10/2/2017 :11/24/2017 5 40 ....................................................................I ........................................................... 2 Site Preparation }Site Preparation ;11/27/2017 :12/1/2017 . 5: 5 ; ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. .............................................................. 3 :Grading :Grading :12/4/2017 :12/15/2017 5 10 ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- ................ .............................................................. 4 ;Building Construction :Building Construction ;1/2/2018 ::1/4/2019 5 264 .................................................................................................................................... ........................... ........................... .. .... ....... ...... 5 'Paving : Paving :1/7/2019 :1/18/2019 .... ....................................... ' 5: 10 .............................................................. ............................................................................... — — 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/31/2019 5i 9: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 157,500; Non -Residential Outdoor: 52,500 (Architectural Coating — sqft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition ;Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.001 81 0.73 ........................................................................... ............................. ............................... ......................................... ............................................... .................................... ..................................... Site Preparation :Graders i 1 : 8.00:: 174:: 0.41 ............................................................................................................................................ Demolition ;Rubber Tired Dozers ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.001 2551 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... Scrapers r ............................................ .................................. 1 .................................... 8.00:: 3611: ..................................... 0.48 .......................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes r . ............................................................................. 1 .................................... 7.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Demolition ......................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes .......................................................................................................................................................... 3: 8.001 971 0.37 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... ;Graders ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.00:: 174:: ..................................... 0.41 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... i Rubber Tired Dozers . ........................................................................ 1 .................................... 8.00 255 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Grading ......................................................... . iTractors/Loaders/Backhoes i .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 7.001 971 0.37 .......................................................................... Building Construction i ..................................................................... Cranes . .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 8.00 2261 0.29 .......................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................................................................ .................................... ..................................... Building Construction Forklifts 2:: 7.00:: 891 0.20 .................................................................................................................................................. Building Construction :Generator Sets r ............................................................................... .................................... 8.00:: 84:: 1 ..................................... 0.74 .......................................................................... Building Construction ...................................................................... . ............................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 .................................... 6.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Building Construction ......................................... ............................. ;Welders . ..................................... ............................................................................................................. 3 8.00 46: 0.45 ........................................................................... Paving ................................................................. ;Cement and Mortar Mixers ............................................................................... .................................... 8.001: 9: ..................................... 0.56 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Pavers ............................................................................... 1 .......................................................................... 8.001 1251 0.42 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... ;Paving Equipment . ......................................................................... ................................... 8.00: 130:: 0.36 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Rollers ............................................................................... 2:: .................................... 8.001: 80:: ..................................... 0.38 ........................................................................... Paving P ....................................................................... Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . ........................................................................ 1 ................................... .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 .......................................................................... Architectural Coating ...................................................................... 'Air Compressors .................................... 6.00: 78:: ..................................... 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 51 13.00; 0.00; 172.00'• 14.70: 6.90; 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ........................ Site Preparation 3 8.00; 0.00': ........................... 0.00: .............................. 14.70; 6.90: -� 20.00; LD Mix ' HDT_Mix HHDT ...................................................--------------------------------r---------------------------............................ Grading 4i 10.00; ;..........................�---------------------..............................-------------------------r----...................................................................................... 0.00: 0.00; 14.70; 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix :HDTMix HHDT ........................ Building Construction 8 r 34.00 ;.......................... 17.001 0.00 .. 14.70 ........................ :.. ... 6.90: . 20.00 LID Mix ..,. HDT_Mix ... HHDT ........................... Paving 6 ....................................................... 15.00 0.001 . 0.00; 14.70 6.90; -------------------------- 20.00 LID Mix "HDT_Mix '...... ,............ HHDT .............................................................................. .................................. ---------- ...................... -------------------------- Architectural Coating 1: 7.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: ...................... 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix ...................... ; HDT_Mix ..................... : HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.9323 1 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 1 0.1412 0.0000 0.0000 .: . Off -Road ,. 2.7216 i 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i I 1.6062 I 1.6062 i i 1.5022 : 1.5022 2,457.4682: 0.6235 : 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 17777.6-235 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0695 1.0804 0.7995 3.1700e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0920 0.0205 0.0157 0.0363 314.3095 1 2.2200e- i 314.3562 003 003 ..............................i .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i : ; 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 j I I i EE W orker fl 0.0488 0.0613 0.7644 1.8400e- i 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 148.7114 7.3200e- 148.8651 003 003 003 003 Total 0.1183 1.1417 1.5639 5.0100e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2385 0.0591 0.0168 0.0759 463.0208 9.5400e- 463.2212 003 1 1 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9323 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 0.1412 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; : ; i I.. ...................:............................................................................. ...............:.....................................:.......................................i..................:...................• Off -Road ; 2.7216 1 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i 1 1.6062 1 1.6062 1 1 1.5022 1.5022 ; I 2,457.46821 0.6235 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 j 12,457.46821 0.6235 1 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0695 1.0804 0.7995 3.1700e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0920 0.0205 0.0157 0.0363 314.3095 i 2.2200e- i 314.3562 V 003 003 ..............................� .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i : ; 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 .............................. I I `......................................'....................+.................. i EE a...................`...................'...................`...................1................... Worker «...................'.........................................................;...................'...................'................... �? 0.0488 0.0613 0.7644 1.8400e- i 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 148.7114 7.3200e- 148.8651 003 003 003 003 Total 0.1183 1.1417 1.5639 5.0100e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2385 0.0591 0.0168 0.0759 463.0208 9.5400e- 463.2212 003 1 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 I 1.3967 1.3967 I 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 ..'... ..'... ...'... ...'... 0.7474 W orker ,; 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- i 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 004 ii 003 Total 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 i 1.3967 1.3967 i 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 ..'... ..'... ...'... ...'... 0.6448 W orker ,; 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- i 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 004 ii 003 Total 0.0300 0.0377 0.4704 1.1300e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 91.5147 4.5000e- 91.6093 003 004 1 004 003 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; ° 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Off -Road ; 2.6973 I 28.1608 i 18.9679 I 0.0206 i i 1.5550 i 1.5550 i I 1.4306 I 1.4306 ; i2,104.5737i 0.6448 i 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................,;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 i i E 1.4306 .............................. ...............I ............. ............. ............. .............. .............. 0.6448 W orker �? 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- i 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 0.0000 ...1 .................. .... ;....;.... Off -Road 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 1 5550 ° 1 5550 1 4306 14306 2,104.57371 0.6448 i �, 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 i i E 1 1.1992 .............................. ...............I ............. ............. ............. .............. .............. W orker �? 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- i 0.1118 9.00OOe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 2,327.6664 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0375 0.0472 0.5880 1.4200e- 0.1118 9.00OOe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 114.3934 5.6300e- 114.5116 003 004 004 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; � � i 2,317.2089; 0.4980 i 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1216 1.2261 1.5168 3.6900e- 0.1063 0.0203 0.1266 0.0303 0.0187 0.0490 358.5267 i 2.5400e- 0.0249 003 003 1.2511 «.....................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r..............................I................ ...[358.5801 ................. W orker ,; 0.1151 0.1454 1.8159 4.8100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 374.4655 0.0178 374.8387 2,317.2089 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,327.6664 Total 0.2367 1.3716 3.3327 8.5000e- 0.4863 0.0233 0.5096 0.1311 0.0214 0.1525 732.9923 0.0203 733.4188 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; � � i 2,317.2089; 0.4980 i 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1216 1.2261 1.5168 3.6900e- 0.1063 0.0203 0.1266 0.0303 0.0187 0.0490 358.5267 i 2.5400e- 0.0249 003 003 1.0846 «.....................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r..............................I................ ...[358.5801 ................. W orker ,; 0.1151 0.1454 1.8159 4.8100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 374.4655 0.0178 374.8387 1 2,299.7816 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,309.8005 Total 0.2367 1.3716 3.3327 8.5000e- 0.4863 0.0233 0.5096 0.1311 0.0214 0.1525 732.9923 0.0203 733.4188 003 1 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1152 1.1308 1.4598 3.6700e- 0.1063 0.0193 0.1256 0.0303 0.0177 0.0480 351.5617 i 2.4900e- 0.0249 003 003 1.0846 «......................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... I................ ...[351.6140 r............................................... W orker 0.1059 0.1334 1.6689 4.8000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 360.2693 0.0166 360.6186 1 2,299.7816 003 003 003 2,309.8005 Total 0.2211 1.2642 3.1288 8.4700e- 0.4863 0.0222 0.5085 0.1311 0.0205 0.1515 711.8310 0.0191 712.2326 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; ; ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:...................:.......................................: :i ................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor ; 0.1152 1.1308 1.4598 3.6700e- 0.1063 0.0193 0.1256 0.0303 0.0177 0.0480 351.5617 i 2.4900e- 0.0176 003 003 0.7225 «......................................,......................................,...................1.........................................................°...................1....................+..................:.........................................................1...................[351.6140 r............................................... W orker 0.1059 0.1334 1.6689 4.8000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 360.2693 0.0166 360.6186 1 003 003 003 Total 0.2211 1.2642 3.1288 8.4700e- 0.4863 0.0222 0.5085 0.1311 0.0205 0.1515 711.8310 0.0191 712.2326 003 1 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road :i 1.2310 i 12.4141 i 11.7009 0.0176 0.72250.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 ; 11,722.2285I' 0.5342 + 1,733.4458 ................... ................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................... i..................;...................-..................{...................�................. ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;.................... ; ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0176 0.7225 ..............................«......................................;......................................;................. �;.............. .............+..................:............................................................................�................... 0.6658 Worker ,; 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 l 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 1 003 003 I 003 ii 003 Total 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road :i 1.2310 i 12.4141 i 11.7009 0.0176 0.72250.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 ; 11,722.2285I' 0.5342 + 1,733.4458 ................... ..............................'. ........................................................................................................................................................................... i..................;...................-..................{...................�................. ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;.................... ; ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 E 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 E 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- ..............................«......................................;......................................;................. �;.............. .............+..................:............................................................................�................... 0.1288 Worker ,; 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- E 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 l 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 281.4481 003 003 I 003 ii 003 281.9473 Total 0.0467 0.0589 0.7363 2.1200e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 158.9423 7.3400e- 159.0964 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 270.3750 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ...........................................................................a...................a......................................a......................................i..................:.....................................a................. �. ..... ..... ... Off -Road ; 0.2664 1 1.8354 1.8413 E 2.9700e- 1 0.1288 0.1288 1 0.1288 0.1288 ; E 281.4481E 0.0238 281.9473 ;E 003 ; .E Total 270.6414 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... E ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- E `................... ............................................................................................................................................................................ '....................+......................................'...................'................... «.: , ................... W orker ; 0.0218 0.0275 i 0.3436 9.9000e- i 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 281.9473 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 003 Total 0.0218 0.0275 0.3436 9.9000e- 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 004 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 270.3750 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .'...........................................................................a...................a......................................a......................................i..................:.....................................a................. �. ..... ..... ... Off -Road ; 0.2664 1 1.8354 1.8413 E 2.9700e- 1 0.1288 0.1288 1 0.1288 0.1288 ; E 281.4481E 0.0238 281.9473 ;E 003 ; .E Total 270.6414 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.3393 1 5.0384 21.2067 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 : Unmitigated ; 2.3393 5.0384 21.2067 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................,;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i `................... ............................................................................................................................................................................ '....................+......................................'...................'................... «.: , ................... W orker ; 0.0218 0.0275 i 0.3436 9.9000e- i 0.0782 6.00OOe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 '1 004 004 004 ii 003 Total 0.0218 0.0275 0.3436 9.9000e- 0.0782 6.00OOe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 74.1731 3.4200e- 74.2450 004 004 1 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.3393 1 5.0384 21.2067 0.0555 3.6381 0.0766 3.7147 0.9721 ; 0.0706 1.0428 r 4,440.69951 0.1612 4,444.0854 : Unmitigated ; 2.3393 5.0384 21.2067 0.0555 3.6381 0.0766 3.7147 0.9721 0.0706 1.0428 ; 4,440.6995: 0.1612 :4,444.0854 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Office Park 250.00 i 35.90 16.64 ' 628,689 628,689 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru 636.00 636.00 636.00 870,401 870,401 Total 886.00 671.90 652.64 1,499,090 1,499,090 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by W Office Park I 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.0048.00 3 119.00 ; 82 ; 15 ; 3 ..............................:................................................................................. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 .......................... ............................................................ 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category s Use Ib/day PM10 Ib/day Total NaturalGas ;1 0.0356 1 0.3232 1 0.2715 1.9400e- i 0.0246 1 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 1 387.8324E 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 Mitigated ;1 003 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day 1 003 003 r........................................ ore w/o Drive1 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 005 +� i E E E TL.... �; ` ; `.........................................................1........................................R...................................... '...................`...................................... ..............................1.................r......................................1...................'...................` ..................1................... Office Park 1 3268.49 :I 0.0353 ; 0.3204 ; 0.2692 1 1.9200e- 0.0244 i 0.0244 I I 0.0244 i 0.0244 ; 1384.5286 , 7.3700e- , 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 ; 003 003 .............................. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ....................................... ................................. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. `. NaturalGas ; 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 E 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 E 0.0246 0.0246 ; E 387.8324E 7.4300e- E 7.1100e- E 390.1927 Unmitigated ;E 387.8324 003 7.1100e- 390.1927 ; 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst 28.0822 3E 3.000Oe- E 2.7500e- E 2.3100e- E 2.000Oe- E 1 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- 1 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- ; 1 3.3038 6.000Oe- E 6.000Oe- 3.3239 ore w/o Drive1 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; 005 005 +� i E E E TL.... �; ` ; `.........................................................1........................................R...................................... '...................`...................................... ..............................1.................r......................................1...................'...................` ..................1................... Office Park 1 3268.49 :I 0.0353 ; 0.3204 ; 0.2692 1 1.9200e- 0.0244 i 0.0244 I I 0.0244 i 0.0244 ; 1384.5286 , 7.3700e- , 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 ; 003 003 Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 7767 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- I ; Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst i 0.0280822:: 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- 3.3038 6.000Oe- I 6.000Oe- 1 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 TM... : 1i ...................• i i i i i ............................f.................................................................................................................. ................... j................... ................... .................... ;...............................................................................;................... •................... Office Park i 3.26849 41 0.0353 i 0.3204 0.2692 1.9200e- i i 0.0244 I 0.0244 i i 0.0244 i 0.0244 , 1384.5286 1 7.3700e- i 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 003 003 .... Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 ........... 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 003 004 005 005 003 003 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.7467 i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- 0.0243 ; 004 005 I 1............... 005 005 005 i 005 .... .............. .............. ...... --- I.................1............... -----------------i............... .............. ........... Unmitigated ; 2.7467 1.000Oe- '• 0.0108 0.0000 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 ; 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 0.0000 .............................. :...................:...................:...................:...................:................... :................... :................... :................... :................... :..................... F ................... ................... j................... ................... ................... ;................... Consumer ; 2.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products.............. ..............i:................... ..............:...................°...................I...................I... I.. ;..... I.. .......... .............. ............... ... .. .............. .............. .............;................... Landscaping ;i 1.0300e- 1.00001- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00001- 4.00001- 4.00001- , 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 1 0.0243 Consumer .i 003 004 005 005 005 1 005 005 t Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 ; 4.00001- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.00001- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 005 005 005 005 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Coating........... �.... �.... ..............i:................... .........................................................;....................... ............. ;... ...�.... .. .. ...... * .............. -- ....... ....................................... ............. Consumer ; 2.0790 1 I I i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r r Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 ; 0.0230 i 6.000Oe- 0.0243 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 ; r 005 Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:33 AM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 27 Briistol Gourmet Food Hall and Storage Project South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 100.00 1000sgft 2.30 100,000.00 0 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru ; 5.00 ; 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company CO2 Intensity 0 CH4Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Info from PD Construction Phase - Based on email and assumptions of construction cycle Demolition - Grading - estimated from site plan Vehicle Trips - Adjusted for Traffic report information Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2019 N20 Intensity 0 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 9.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 264.00 ..............................................................................i. E...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 10.00 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays 3.00 5.00 i.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseEndDate 12/20/2018 1/4/2019 ..............................................................................i..............................................................................;...............................................................................:...................................................................... tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate 1/19/2019 1/21/2019 tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate 12/16/2017 1/2/2018 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate 12/2/2017 12/4/2017 tblConstructionPhase ; PhaseStartDate ; 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/25/2017 11/27/2017 tblGrading i AcresOfGrading 5.00 3.00 .. i........................................................................... ..,... ......................................................................... ;... ................................................................ tblGrading i AcresOfGrading 7.50 4.50 i........................................................................... ........................ tblProjectCharacteristics Operationaffear 2014 2019 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblVehicleTrips : ST TR 1.64 0.36 i..............................................................................;..................................................................................................................................................... tblVehicleTrips : ST TR 90.06 127.20 ...........................................................................i........................................................................... tblVehicleTrips SU TR 0.76 0.17 i..............................................................................;.............................................................................. ....................................................................... tblVehicleTrips SU TR 90.06 127.20 .............................................................................. i............................................................................................................................................................ ...................................................................... tblVehicleTrips WD TR 11.42 2.50 ...........................................................................i........................................................................................................................................................ tblVehicleTrips WD TR ; 90.06 127.20 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8444 i 28.6644 22.4954 0.0294 i 6.4520 1.6245 i 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 i 4.8057 : ; ; : ; : 2,910.50161 0.7519 i 0.0000 12,926.2924 .............................. .: ................................................................................................................................................. :................... :.................... ............... ,...................;................... ;....................................... 2018 i ; : 3.1497 21.9753 19.1758 0.0331 0.4863 1.2746 1.7609 0.1311 1.2208 1.3519 : i 13 023.8672 0.5184 0.0000 3 034.7530 2018 ; 3.1497 i 21.9753 19.1758 I 0.0331 0.4863 1.2746 1.7609 0.1311 1.2208 r 1.3519 I................... I................ �... �... �... i.............................. `.................................. .............................. j ..'... .. ...`... .. ...'... .. �i...................'................... .............. ............. .............. ............. ...............................+.................. .........'................... 2019 ,i 270.6636 20.0839 I 18.5175 0.0330 0.4863 1.1070 1.5934 0.1311 1.0605 1.1915 2,986.1525 0.5415 0.0000 12,997.5239 270.6636 ; i 20.0839 18.5175 0.0330 0.4863 1.1070 1.5934 1 0.1311 1.0605 .: ii 2,986.15251 0.5415 0.0000 r 2,997.5239 Total 276.6577 70.7235 Total 276.6577 70.7235 60.1888 0.0955 1 7.4247 4.0061 11.3622 3.6363 3.8004 7.3491 0.0000 8,920.5213 1.8118 1 0.0000 8,958.5693 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 ; 2.8444 i 28.6644 22.4954 1 0.02946.4520 1.6245 8.0079 3.3742 1.5191 4.8057 2,910.5016 0.7519 i 0.0000 2,926.2924 ..............................° ?................... ......................................---------.................................................................................. ° ...................;........................................................ 2018 ; 3.1497 i 21.9753 19.1758 I 0.0331 0.4863 1.2746 1.7609 0.1311 1.2208 r 1.3519 ; 13,023.8672; 0.5184 0.0000 r 3,034.7530 r r ' ..... r r 2019 270.6636 ; i 20.0839 18.5175 0.0330 0.4863 1.1070 1.5934 1 0.1311 1.0605 .: 1.1915 2,986.15251 0.5415 0.0000 r 2,997.5239 Total 276.6577 70.7235 60.1888 0.0955 7.4247 4.0067-'[7 3.6363 3.8004 7.3491 1 8,920.5213 1.8118 0.0000 8,958.5693 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM ROG NO CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 1.00OOe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- I 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 0.0230 6.00OOe- 0.0243 4.00OOe- 004 005 005 005 005 005 .............................. ................................................................................................................................................................ :................... :.................... ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Energy .� 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 � 387.8324 � 7.4300e- � 7.1100e- 390.1927 r 003 003 003 .............................. ....................................... I..... .............. I...................'................. ............. .............. ............. ...............................+.................. i......................................'......................................................... Mobile ;i 2.4305 5.2703 21.7938 0.0527 3.6381 0.0770 3.7151 0.9721 0.0710 1.0432 4,229.8554 0.1615 4,233.2469 0.0246 ii 390.1927 003 Total 5.2127 5.5936 22.0761 0.0547 3.6381 0.1016 3.7397 0.9721 0.0956 1.0678 21.7938 0.0527 3.6381 0.0770 3.7151 0.9721 0.0710 4,617.7107 0.1690 7.1100e- 4,623.4639 5.2127 11 22.0761 0.0547 3.6381 0.1016 3.7397 0.9721 0.0956 1.0678 1-7 0.1690 7.1100e- 003 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area ; 2.7467 : 1.00OOe- I 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.00OOe-..4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.00OOe- ; 0.0230 6.00OOe- i 0.0243 004 I I 005 005 005 005 005 .................................... 1 ........... .......................... 1 ............ I ...................................... ......................................................... Energy ; 0.0356 0.3232 1 0.2715 i 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 ; i 387.8324 1 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 ; 003 003 .............................. r ........ • ;................... •...................• ------........I................... •.................... r :................... •................ ............. ............. Mobile ; 2.4305 5.2703 r r 21.7938 0.0527 3.6381 0.0770 3.7151 0.9721 0.0710 1.0432 ; 4,229.8554; 0.1615 r r 4,233.2469 Total 5.2127 5.5936 22.0761 0.0547 3.6381 0.1016 3.7397 0.9721 0.0956 1.0678 4,617.7107 0.1690 7.1100e- 4,623.4639 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NB10-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/31/2019 5i 9: 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name I Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition :Demolition ;10/2/2017 :11/24/2017 5 40 ....................................................................I ........................................................... 2 Site Preparation }Site Preparation ;11/27/2017 :12/1/2017 . 5: 5 ; ..............................................................................a ........................... ........................... ............................................. .............................................................. 3 :Grading :Grading :12/4/2017 :12/15/2017 5 10 ............................................................. ........................... ........................... ---------------- ................ .............................................................. 4 ;Building Construction :Building Construction ;1/2/2018 ::1/4/2019 5 264 .................................................................................................................................... ........................... ........................... .. .... ....... ...... 5 'Paving : Paving :1/7/2019 :1/18/2019 .... ....................................... ' 5: 10 .............................................................. ............................................................................... — — 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating :1/21/2019 ::1/31/2019 5i 9: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 157,500; Non -Residential Outdoor: 52,500 (Architectural Coating — sqft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition ;Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.001 81 0.73 ........................................................................... ............................. ............................... ......................................... ............................................... .................................... ..................................... Site Preparation :Graders i 1 : 8.00:: 174:: 0.41 ............................................................................................................................................ Demolition ;Rubber Tired Dozers ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.001 2551 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... Scrapers r ............................................ .................................. 1 .................................... 8.00:: 3611: ..................................... 0.48 .......................................................................... Site Preparation ....................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes r . ............................................................................. 1 .................................... 7.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Demolition ......................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes .......................................................................................................................................................... 3: 8.001 971 0.37 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... ;Graders ............................................................................... 1 .................................... 8.00:: 174:: ..................................... 0.41 ........................................................................... Grading ...................................................................... i Rubber Tired Dozers . ........................................................................ 1 .................................... 8.00 255 ..................................... 0.40 ........................................................................... Grading ......................................................... . iTractors/Loaders/Backhoes i .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 7.001 971 0.37 .......................................................................... Building Construction i ..................................................................... Cranes . .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 8.00 2261 0.29 .......................................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................................................................ .................................... ..................................... Building Construction Forklifts 2:: 7.00:: 891 0.20 .................................................................................................................................................. Building Construction :Generator Sets r ............................................................................... .................................... 8.00:: 84:: 1 ..................................... 0.74 .......................................................................... Building Construction ...................................................................... . ............................................................................... ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 .................................... 6.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 ........................................................................... Building Construction ......................................... ............................. ;Welders . ..................................... ............................................................................................................. 3 8.00 46: 0.45 ........................................................................... Paving ................................................................. ;Cement and Mortar Mixers ............................................................................... .................................... 8.001: 9: ..................................... 0.56 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Pavers ............................................................................... 1 .......................................................................... 8.001 1251 0.42 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... ;Paving Equipment . ......................................................................... ................................... 8.00: 130:: 0.36 ........................................................................... Paving ...................................................................... Rollers ............................................................................... 2:: .................................... 8.001: 80:: ..................................... 0.38 ........................................................................... Paving P ....................................................................... Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . ........................................................................ 1 ................................... .................................... 8.001 971 ..................................... 0.37 .......................................................................... Architectural Coating ...................................................................... 'Air Compressors .................................... 6.00: 78:: ..................................... 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 51 13.00; 0.00; 172.00'• 14.70: 6.90; 20.00: LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ........................ Site Preparation 3 8.00; 0.00': ........................... 0.00: .............................. 14.70; 6.90: -� 20.00; LD Mix ' HDT_Mix HHDT ...................................................--------------------------------r---------------------------............................ Grading 4i 10.00; ;..........................�---------------------..............................-------------------------r----...................................................................................... 0.00: 0.00; 14.70; 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix :HDTMix HHDT ........................ Building Construction 8 r 34.00 ;.......................... 17.001 0.00 .. 14.70 ........................ :.. ... 6.90: . 20.00 LID Mix ..,. HDT_Mix ... HHDT ........................... Paving 6 ....................................................... 15.00 0.001 . 0.00; 14.70 6.90; -------------------------- 20.00 LID Mix "HDT_Mix '...... ,............ HHDT .............................................................................. .................................. ---------- ...................... -------------------------- Architectural Coating 1: 7.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: ...................... 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix ...................... ; HDT_Mix ..................... : HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; 0.9323 1 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 1 0.1412 0.0000 0.0000 .: . Off -Road ,. 2.7216 i 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i I 1.6062 I 1.6062 i i 1.5022 : 1.5022 2,457.4682: 0.6235 : 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 17777.6-235 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0731 1.1195 0.9225 3.1600e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0921 0.0205 0.0158 0.0363 313.5615 1 2.2500e- i 313.6088 003 003 ..............................i .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ,...................;...................;...................,................... Vendor; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ..............................«---------------- : ; 1 �;...................,...................................... :................... ................... --....................................... ;.................. ................... ...................°......................................1................... W orker ;................... ,; 0.0497 0.0673 0.7017 1.7200e- 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 139.4719 7.3200e- 139.6256 1 '1 003 003 003 ii 003 Total 0.1229 1.1868 1.6242 4.8800e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2386 0.0591 0.0169 0.0759 453.0334 9.5700e- 453.2345 003 1 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9323 0.0000 0.9323 0.1412 0.0000 0.1412 ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; : ; i I.. ...................:............................................................................. ...............:.....................................:.......................................i..................:...................• Off -Road ; 2.7216 1 26.5855 1 20.8712 i 0.0245 i 1 1.6062 1 1.6062 1 1 1.5022 1.5022 ; I 2,457.46821 0.6235 2,470.5620 Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245 0.9323 1.6062 2.5385 0.1412 1.5022 1.6434 j 12,457.46821 0.6235 1 2,470.5620 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0731 1.1195 0.9225 3.1600e- 0.0749 0.0171 0.0921 0.0205 0.0158 0.0363 313.5615 i 2.2500e- i 313.6088 V 003 003 ..............................� .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ..............................«------------------....................,......................................;...................:...................................... : ; i �; --....................................... ;....................................... ...................°......................................1................... Worker ,; 0.0497 0.0673 0.7017 1.7200e- 0.1453 1.1700e- 0.1465 0.0385 1.0800e- 0.0396 139.4719 7.3200e- 139.6256 '1 003 003 003 ii 003 Total 0.1229 1.1868 1.6242 4.8800e- 0.2203 0.0183 0.2386 0.0591 0.0169 0.0759 453.0334 9.5700e- 453.2345 003 1 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 I 1.3967 1.3967 I 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0238 0.9545 ; 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 .............................. ..........................................................+...................................... ... •.. .................................. ...« , W orker . 0.0306 00414 1 0.4318 0.0894 7.2000e- 00901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85. 450e- 85.9235 004 004 ii 003003 Total 0.0306 0.0414 0.4318 1.0600e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85.8289 4.5000e- 85.9235 003 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust0.9545 0.0000 0.9545 ° 0.1031 ° 0.0000 0.1031 0.0000 0.0000 ii ...................................... i ................... ..................................... .i Off-Road2.5289 1 28.6230 i 17.1310 i 0.0238 i 1.3967 1.3967 i 1.2850 1.2850 ; 2,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 Total 2.5289 28.6230 17.1310 0.0238 0.9545 1.3967 2.3512 0.1031 1.2850 1.3880 12,439.43601 0.7474 2,455.1322 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... ; ,................... ;................... ;................... ,................... Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0206 6.3402 ; 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 .............................. ..........................................................+...................................... ... •.. .................................. ...« , W orker . 0.0306 00414 i 0.4318 0.0894 7.2000e- 00901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85. 450e- 85.9235 004 004 ii 003003 Total 0.0306 0.0414 0.4318 1.0600e- 0.0894 7.2000e- 0.0901 0.0237 6.6000e- 0.0244 85.8289 4.5000e- 85.9235 003 004 1 004 003 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; ° 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Off -Road ; 2.6973 I 28.1608 i 18.9679 I 0.0206 i i 1.5550 i 1.5550 i I 1.4306 I 1.4306 ; i2,104.5737i 0.6448 i 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; i .............................. .: ..................,;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 �' I I :.. 1.4306 4.7752 ..'. ..................... ....................:... .... ..... ...... ,..................:...................:............................................................................ ............... .............. 0.6448 W orker �? 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- i 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- 0.1118 9.000Oe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ; ° 6.3402 0.0000 6.3402 3.3446 0.0000 3.3446 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 Off -Road ; 2.6973 I 28.1608 i 18.9679 I 0.0206 i i 1.5550 i 1.5550 i I 1.4306 I 1.4306 ; i2,104.5737i 0.6448 i 2,118.1153 Total 2.6973 28.1608 18.9679 0.0206 6.3402 1.5550 7.8953 3.3446 1.4306 4.7752 2,104.5737 0.6448 2,118.1153 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.4 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; i .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... i ,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 �' I I :...................................... 1.1992 ............... .............. -------------------'. ..................... . ,...................I... ..:.....,...................................... ................... ................... W orker �? 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- i 0.1118 9.00OOe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 2,327.6664 003 004 004 003 Total 0.0382 0.0518 0.5398 1.3300e- 0.1118 9.00OOe- 0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e- 0.0305 107.2861 5.6300e- 107.4043 003 004 004 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; � � i 2,317.2089; 0.4980 i 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... : ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... : Vendor �� 0.1324 1.2557 1.8514 3.6600e- 0.1063 0.0205 0.1268 0.0303 0.0189 0.0491 r 355.5062 2.6200e- 355.5612 0.0249 : 003 r : 003 .............................. �: i «......................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r I................... .... ............... W orker ,; 0.1169 0.1596 1.6607 4.5100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 351.1522 0.0178 351.5253 2,317.2089 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,327.6664 Total 0.2494 1.4152 3.5121 8.1700e- 0.4863 0.0235 0.5098 0.1311 0.0216 0.1527 706.6583 0.0204 707.0866 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.9004 i 20.5600 i 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 r r ; � � i 2,317.2089; 0.4980 i 2,327.6664 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.2089 0.4980 2,327.6664 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... : ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... : Vendor �� 0.1324 1.2557 1.8514 3.6600e- 0.1063 0.0205 0.1268 0.0303 0.0189 0.0491 r 355.5062 2.6200e- 355.5612 0.0249 : 003 r : 003 .............................. �: i «......................................,......................................,................... I......................................................... °................... I....................+..................:......................................................... r I................... .... ............... W orker ,; 0.1169 0.1596 1.6607 4.5100e- 0.3800 2.9700e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7500e- 0.1035 351.1522 0.0178 351.5253 1 2,299.7816 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,309.8005 Total 0.2494 1.4152 3.5121 8.1700e- 0.4863 0.0235 0.5098 0.1311 0.0216 0.1527 706.6583 0.0204 707.0866 003 1 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : : : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,299.7816 0.4771 .: : : : Vendor �� 0.1252 1.1574 1.7906 3.6500e- 0.1063 0.0195 0.1258 0.0303 0.0179 0.0482 r 348.5863 2.5700e- 348.6404 0.0249 : : 003 r : 003 1.0846 �: i ...................°...................I....................+..................:.........................................................I...................................... .................................................................................................I...................................... r W orker ,; 0.1075 0.1463 1.5221 4.5000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 337.7846 0.0166 338.1339 1 2,299.7816 '1 003 003 003 ii 2,309.8005 Total 0.2327 1.3037 3.3127 8.1500e- 0.4863 0.0224 0.5087 0.1311 0.0206 0.1517 686.3710 0.0192 686.7743 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road ; 2.5471 i 18.7802 i 15.2049 0.0249 i i 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 r r r ; � � � 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 1 2,299.7816 0.4771 2,309.8005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : : : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: : : : Vendor �� 0.1252 1.1574 1.7906 3.6500e- 0.1063 0.0195 0.1258 0.0303 0.0179 0.0482 r 348.5863 2.5700e- 348.6404 0.0176 : : 003 r : 003 0.7225 �: i ...................°...................1....................+..................:.........................................................1...................................... ............................................................................. .................... 1................... ................... r W orker ,; 0.1075 0.1463 1.5221 4.5000e- i 0.3800 2.9200e- 0.3830 0.1008 2.7100e- 0.1035 337.7846 0.0166 338.1339 1 '1 003 003 003 ii Total 0.2327 1.3037 3.3127 8.1500e- 0.4863 0.0224 0.5087 0.1311 0.0206 0.1517 686.3710 0.0192 686.7743 003 1 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I I PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road „ 1.2310 i 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 , 11,722.2285' 0.5342 1,733.4458 .............................. ii �. ......................................i..................:...................-..................{....................... .................................. ..................:........................................................................ 1 11 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .: ; 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; i .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... i :,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 �: 1 0.6658 0.6658 1 ...............1 ...............: .............. ............. .. .............. ---------------- '. ,.................... ....................:...,..................:......................................................... ...................................... Worker �? 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.340, 149.1767 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.3400e- 149.1767 003 003 1 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road :i 1.2310 i 12.4141 i 11.7009 0.0176 0.72250.7225 0.6658 1 0.6658 ; 11,722.2285I' 0.5342 + 1,733.4458 ................... ................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................... i..................;...................-..................{...................�................. ............. Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1 11,722.22851 0.5342 1 1,733.4458 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.6 Paving - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ..................•;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;................... ;..................... E :,....................................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- �: E 0.1288 ...............E ...............: .............. ............. .. .............. ---------------- '. ,.................... ....................:...,..................:......................................................... ...................................... Worker �? 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- i 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.340, 149.1767 281.9473 003 003 003 003 003 Total 0.0474 0.0645 0.6715 1.9800e- 0.1677 1.2900e- 0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e- 0.0457 149.0226 7.3400e- 149.1767 003 003 1 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 270.3750 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .:...........................................................................a...................a......................................a...................'...................i..................:.....................................a................. �. ..... ..... ... Off -Road ; 0.2664 1 1.8354 1.8413 E 2.9700e- 1 0.1288 0.1288 1 0.1288 0.1288 ; E 281.4481E 0.0238 281.9473 ;E 003 ; .E Total 270.6414 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. .: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... E ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor : �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 W orker ,; 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- i 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 281.9473 004 004 004 ii 003 003 Total 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 004 004 1 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 270.3750 0.0000 0.0000 ° 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .'...........................................................................a...................a......................................a......................................i..................:.....................................a................. �. ..... ..... ... Off -Road ; 0.2664 1 1.8354 1.8413 E 2.9700e- 1 0.1288 0.1288 1 0.1288 0.1288 ; E 281.4481E 0.0238 281.9473 ;E 003 ; .E Total 270.6414 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.4305 5.2703 : 21.7938 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 ■: : ; : Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : ; : ; ; ; : : : : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; .............................. ■: ...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;...................;.................... i ,................... ;................... ;................... ;................... Vendor 0.0000: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00005439 W orker ,; 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- i 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69. 3.4200e- 69.6158 004 004 004 ii 003 Total 0.0221 0.0301 0.3134 9.3000e- 0.0782 6.000Oe- 0.0789 0.0208 5.6000e- 0.0213 69.5439 3.4200e- 69.6158 004 004 1 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.4305 5.2703 : 21.7938 0.0527 3.6381 ; ; 0.0770 3.7151 0.9721 0.0710 1.0432 r ■ 4,229.8554: 0.1615 14,233.2469 ■: : ; : Unmitigated ; 2.4305 5.2703 21.7938 0.0527 3.6381 0.0770 3.7151 0.9721 0.0710 1.0432 ; 4,229.8554; 0.1615 :4,233.2469 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 23 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Land Use Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Office Park 250.00 i 35.90 16.64 ' 628,689 628,689 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive Thru 636.00 636.00 636.00 870,401 870,401 Total 886.00 671.90 652.64 1,499,090 1,499,090 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by W Office Park I 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.0048.00 3 119.00 ; 82 ; 15 ; 3 ..............................:................................................................................. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive 16.60 .......................... ............................................................ 8.40 6.90 7.40 73.60 19.00 41 6 53 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.510142; 0.059804: 0.180842: 0.139058: 0.042603: 0.006701: 0.0161071 0.033206: 0.0019391 0.002487: 0.004384: 0.0005801 0.00214E 2.2 AnffK Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category s Use Ib/day PM10 I Ib/day Total NaturalGas ;1 0.0356 1 0.3232 1 0.2715 1.9400e- i 0.0246 1 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 1 387.8324E 7.4300e- i 7.1100e- 390.1927 Mitigated ;1 003 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day 1 003 003 r........................................ 003 003 003 :.. : : .......................................:...................:................. ..............;.........................................................;...................;....................*..................:......................................I......................................................... Pharmacy/Drugst E 28.0822 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- , 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- , 2.1000e- 2.1000e- ; 3.3038 , 6.000Oe- , 6.000Oe- 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 1 003 1 005 1 004 1 004 004 004 ; 005 005 TL... . Total 0.0356 .............................. ... ...:. ...... . ............. ..................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ............. ............. `. NaturalGas ; 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 E 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 E 0.0246 0.0246 ; E 387.8324E 7.4300e- E 7.1100e- E 390.1927 Unmitigated ;E 7.4300e- 003 390.1927 ; 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Office Park E 3268.49 3E 0.0353 E 0.3204 E 0.2692 E 1.9200e- E 1 0.0244 E 0.0244 0.0244 E 0.0244 ; 1 384.5286 E 7.3700e- E 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 003 003 :.. : : .......................................:...................:................. ..............;.........................................................;...................;....................*..................:......................................I......................................................... Pharmacy/Drugst E 28.0822 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- , 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- E 2.1000e- , 2.1000e- 2.1000e- ; 3.3038 , 6.000Oe- , 6.000Oe- 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 1 003 1 005 1 004 1 004 004 004 ; 005 005 TL... . Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 25 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- I ; Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Pharmacy/Drugst i 0.0280822:: 3.000Oe- 2.7500e- 2.3100e- 2.000Oe- 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- I 2.1000e- 3.3038 6.000Oe- I 6.000Oe- 1 3.3239 ore w/o Drive 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 TM... : 1i ...................• i i i i i ............................f.................................................................................................................. ................... j................... ................... .................... ;...............................................................................;................... •................... Office Park i 3.26849 41 0.0353 i 0.3204 0.2692 1.9200e- i i 0.0244 I 0.0244 i i 0.0244 i 0.0244 , 1384.5286 1 7.3700e- i 7.0500e- 386.8688 003 003 003 .... Total 0.0356 0.3232 0.2715 1.9400e- 0.0246 0.0246 ........... 0.0246 0.0246 387.8324 7.4300e- 7.1100e- 390.1927 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 003 004 005 005 003 003 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated ; 2.7467 i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 i 4.000Oe- ° 4.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 : 6.000Oe- 0.0243 ; 004 005 I 1............... 005 005 005 i 005 .... .............. .............. ...... --- I.................1............... -----------------i............... .............. ........... Unmitigated ; 2.7467 1.000Oe- '• 0.0108 0.0000 '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- '• 4.000Oe- ; 0.0230 '• 6.000Oe- '• 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 ; 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 26 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 0.0000 .............................. :...................:...................:...................:...................:................... :................... :................... :................... :................... :..................... F ................... ................... j................... ................... ................... ;................... Consumer ; 2.0790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products.............. ..............i:................... ..............:...................°...................I...................I... I.. ;..... I.. .......... .............. ............... ... .. .............. .............. .............;................... Landscaping ;i 1.0300e- 1.00001- 0.0108 0.0000 4.00001- 4.00001- 4.00001- , 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 1 0.0243 Consumer .i 003 004 005 005 005 1 005 005 t Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 ; 4.00001- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.00001- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 005 005 005 005 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural ; 0.6667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Coating........... �.... �.... ..............i:................... .........................................................;....................... ............. ;... ...�.... .. .. ...... * .............. -- ....... ....................................... ............. Consumer ; 2.0790 1 I I i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; r r Landscaping ; 1.03001- i 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 14.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 1 ; 0.0230 i 6.000Oe- 0.0243 003 004 r 005 005 005 005 ; r 005 Total 2.7467 1.000Oe- 0.0108 0.0000 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0230 6.00001- 0.0243 004 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 27 of 27 Date: 2/1/2016 11:45 AM 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation Per Traffic Report for Project Trip Generation for weekday = Size Rate Office 250 trips 100 ksf 0 trip/ksf Retail 1228 trips 38 ksf 32.31579 trip/ksf Restaurant - composite 636 trips 5 ksf _ 127.2 trip/ksf CalEEMod Weekday and Weekend default rates from ITE _ Weekday Saturday Sunday OffiAL 11.42 1.64 0.76 Retail 44.32 42.04 20.43 Restaurant - composite Calculate weekend trips based on Project specific Trip demand from Traffic Report Saturday Rate Sunday Rate Office Nor 36 trips 0.359019 trip/ksf trips 0.166375 trip/ksf Retail 1165 trips 30.65333 trip/ksf 566 trips 14.89647 trip/ksf Restaurant - composite 636 trips 127.2 trip/ksf - 636 trips 127.2 trip/ksf APPENDIX B Biological Data Search Results Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH and WILDLIFE areFin Query Summary: Quad IS (Anaheim (3311778) OR Laguna Beach (3311757) OR Los Alamitos (3311871) OR Newport Beach (3311768) OR Orange (3311777) OR Seal Beach (3311861) OR Tustin (3311767)) Print Close CNDDB Element Query Results CA Scientific Common Taxonomic Element Total Returned Federal State Global State Rare Other Habitats Name Name Group Code Occs Occs Status Status Rank Rank Plant Status Rank BLM S- Chaparral Abronia villosa chaparral Dicots PDNYC010P1 81 4 None None G5T2T3 S2 1 B.1 Sensitive I Coastal scrub var. aurita sand -verbena USFS S- Desert dunes Sensitive Cismontane CDFW WL- woodland Cooper's Watch List I Riparian forest Accipitercoopeni hawk Birds ABNKC12040 103 2 None None G5 S4 null IUCN LC- Riparian Least woodland Concern Upper montane coniferous forest BLM S - Sensitive CDFW SSC - Species of Special Concern Freshwater tricolored IUCN_EN- marsh Marsh & Agelaius tricolor blackbird Birds ABPBXB0020 674 2 None None G2G3 S1S2 null Endangered swamp I Swamp NABCI_RWL- Wetland Red Watch List USFWS BCC - Birds of Conservation Concem southern Aimophila California CDFW WL- Chaparral ruficeps rufous- Birds ABPBX91091 196 13 None None G5T3 S2S3 null Watch List Coastal scrub canescens crowned sparrow CDFW _SSC - Species of Ammodramus grasshopper Special Valley & foothill savannarum sparrow Birds ABPBXA0020 18 2 None None G5 S3 null Concern I grassland IUCN LC - Least Concern Coastal bluff Aphanisma aphanisma Dicots PDCHE02010 67 4 None None G3G4 S2 1B.2 null scrub Coastal blitoides dunes Coastal scrub CDF_S- Brackish marsh Sensitive Estuary Ardea herodias great blue Birds ABNGA04010 135 1 None None GS S4 null IUCN_LC- Freshwater heron Least marsh I Marsh & Concern swamp I Riparian forest I Wetland CDFW SSC- SGSpecies Speciesof Special Chaparral Aspidoscelis orangethroat Concern Cismontane hyperythra whiptail Reptiles ARACJ02060 346 10 None None G5 S2 null IUCN LC- woodland Least Coastal scrub Concern USFS S - Sensitive SB_RSABG- Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Coastal dunes Astragalus Ventura Garden I Coastal scrub pycnostachyus Marsh milk- Dicots PDFAB0F7B1 7 1 Endangered Endangered G2T1 S1 1B.1 SB_SBBG- Marsh & swamp var. lanosissimus vetch Santa Salt marsh Barbara Wetland Botanic Garden BLM S - Sensitive CDFW SSC- Coastal prairie Species of Coastal scrub Special Great Basin Athen Athene Concern I grassland cunicu laria burrowing owl Birds ABNSB10010 1875 7 None None G4 S3 null IUCN LC- Great Basin Least scrub I Mojavean Concern desert scrub USFWS BCC- Sonoran desert Birds of scrub I Valley & Conservation foothill grassland Concern SB_RSABG- Coastal bluff Coulter's Rancho Santa scrub I Coastal Atriplex coulted saltbush Dicots PDCHE040E0 75 6 None None G3 S2 1 B.2 Ana Botanic dunes I Coastal Garden scrub I Valley & foothill grassland Alkali playa south coast Coastal bluff Atriplex pacifica saltscale Dicots PDCHE041C0 77 4 None None G4 S2 1B.2 null scrub I Coastal dunes I Coastal scrub Alkali playa Parish's USFS S- Chenopod scrub Atriplex parishii brittlescale Dicots PDCHE041 DO 16 2 None None G1 G2 S1 1 B.1 Sensitive I Meadow & seep Vernal pool Wetland Atriplex serenana Davidson's Coastal bluff var. davidsonii saltscale Dicots PDCHE041T1 28 5 None None G5T1 S1 1B.2 null scrub I Coastal scrub Bombuscrotchii Crotch Insects IIHYM24480 232 4 None None G3G4 S1S2 null null null bumble bee Chaparral Branchinecta San Diego Crustaceans ICBRA03060 119 2 Endangered None G2 S2 null IUCN_EN- Coastal scrub sandiegonensis fairy shrimp Endangered Vernal pool Wetland CDFW WL- Great Basin Watch List I grassland IUCN_LC- Great Basin ferruginous Least scrub � Pinon & Buteo regalis hawk Birds ABNKC19120 103 1 None None G4 S3S4 null Concern USFWS BCC- juniper woodlands I Birds of Valley & foothill on Conservation grassland Concern BLM S- Sensitive I Great Basin IUCN_LC- grassland Swainson's Least Riparian forest Buteo swainson1 hawk Birds ABNKC19070 2394 1 None Threatened G5 S3 null Concern Riparian USFWS_BCC- woodland Birds of Valley & foothill Conservation grassland Concern CaliforniaaCaliforniaia Walnut Woodland Walnut Woodland CTT71210CA 76 2 None None G2 S2.1 null null woodland woodland Woodland SB RSABG- Calochortus Rancho Santa Chaparral weedii var. intermediate Monocots PMLILOD1J1 117 14 None None G3G4T2 S2 1B.2 Ana Botanic Coastal scrub intermedius mariposa-lily Garden I Valley & foothill USFS_S- grassland Sensitive CDFW SSC- Species of Special Campylorhynchus Concern brunneicapillus coastal Birds ABPBG02095 150 19 None None G5T3Q S3 null USFS S- Coastal scrub sandiegensis cactus wren Sensitive USFWS_BCC- Birds of Conservation Concern AFS_TH- Aquatic I South Catostomus Santa Ana Fish AFCJCO2190 27 4 Threatened None G1 S1 null Threatened I coast flowing santaanae sucker IUCN VU- waters Vulnerable Marsh & swamp Centromadia SB_RSABG- Salt marsh parryi ssp. southern Dicots PDAST4ROP4 87 34 None None G3T2 S2 16.1 Rancho Santa Valley & foothill australis tarplant Ana Botanic grassland Garden Vernal pool Wetland BLM_S- ChaenactisSensitive I Coastal bluff glabrivar. Orcutt's Dicots PDAST20095 23 2 None None G5T1T2 S1 1B.1 SB_RSABG- scrub Coastal orcuttiana iana pincushion Rancho Santa dunes Ana Botanic Garden CDFW SSC- SGSpecies Speciesof Special ConcernI Great Basin Charadrius western I NABCI RWL- standing waters alexandrinus snowy plover Birds ABNNB03031 121 5 Threatened None G3T3 S2 null Red Watch Sand shore nivosus List I Wetland USFWS BCC- Birds of Conservation Concern IUCN_LC- Chaparral Least Mojavean desert Charina trivirgata rosy boa Reptiles ARADA01020 48 1 None None G4G5 S3S4 null Concern scrub I Sonoran USFS_S- desert scrub Sensitive Chelonia mydas green turtle Reptiles ARAAA02010 2 1 Threatened None G3 S1 null IUCN_EN- Marine bay Endangered Chloropyron SB_RSABG- Coastal dunes maritimum ssp. salt marsh Dicots PDSCROJOC2 27 4 Endangered Endangered G4?T1 S1 16.2 Rancho Santa Marsh &swamp maritimum bird's-beak Ana Botanic Salt marsh Garden Wetland CDFW_SSC- Species of Special Pinon & juniper Choeronycteris Mexican long- Concern I woodlands mexicana tongued bat Mammals AMACB02010 14 1 None None G4 S1 null IUCN_NT- Riparian scrub Near Sonoran thom Threatened woodland WBWG H- High Priority western tidal- Estuary I Mud Cicindela gabbii flat tiger Insects IICOL02080 9 5 None None G2G4 S1 null null shore/flats beetle Cicindela hirticollis sandy beach Insects IICOL02101 34 3 None None G5T2 S1 null null Coastal dunes gravida tiger beetle Cicindela western latesignata beach tiger Insects IICOL02113 15 5 None None G2G4T1T2 S1 null null Mud shore/flats latesignata beetle Cicindela senilis senile tiger Insects IICOL02121 9 1 None None G2G3T1T3 S1 null null Mud shore/flats frosti beetle Wetland BLM S- Sensitive NABCI_RWL- Red Watch Coccyzus western List americanus yellow-billed Birds ABNRB02022 155 3 Threatened Endangered G5T2T3 S1 null USFS S- Riparian forest occidentalis cuckoo Sensitive USFWS BCC- Birds of Conservation Concern Coelus globosus globose dune Insects IICOL4A010 49 2 None None G1G2 S1S2 null IUCN_VU- Coastal dunes beetle Vulnerable BLM S- Comarostaphylis Sensitive I Chaparral diversifoliassp. summer holly Dicots PDERIOB011 106 1 None None G3T2 S2 1B.2 SBRSABG- Cismontane diversifolia Ran_cho Santa woodland Ana Botanic Garden CDFW SSC- Species of Chaparral Crotalus ruber red-diamond Reptiles ARADE02090 161 3 None None G4 S3 null Special Mojavean desert rattlesnake Concern I scrub I Sonoran USFS S- desert scrub Sensitive monarch - Danaus plexippus California Insects IILEPP2012 354 9 None None G4T2T3 S2S3 null USFS_S- Closed-cone pop. 1 overwintering Sensitive coniferous forest population BLM S- Sensitive SB_RSABG- Chaparral Dudleya many- stemmed Dicots PDCRA040H0 147 33 None None G2 S2 1 B.2 Rancho Santa Coastal scrub multicaulis dudleya Ana Botanic Valley & foothill Garden I grassland USFS S- Sensitive Chaparral Laguna SB RSABG- Cismontane Dudleya Beach Dicots PDCRA040P0 6 6 Threatened Threatened G1 S1 1B.1 Rancho Santa woodland stolonifera dudleya Ana Botanic Coastal scrub Garden Valley & foothill grassland BLM S- Cismontane Sensitive woodland CDFW_FP- Marsh & swamp Elanus leucurus white-tailed Birds ABNKC06010 158 12 None None G5 S3S4 null Fully Riparian kite Protected I woodland IUCN_LC- Valley & foothill Least grassland Concern lWetland Aquatic I Artificial flowing waters Klamath/North coast flowing waters BLM_S- Klamath/North Sensitive coast standing CDFW_SSC- waters Marsh & Species of swamp Emys marmorata western pond Reptiles ARAAD02030 1147 13 None None G3G4 S3 null Special Sacramento/San turtle Concern Joaquin flowing IUCN VU- waters Vulnerable Sacramento/San USFS S- Joaquin Sensitive standing waters South coast flowing waters South coast standing waters Wetland CDFW_WL- Marine intertidal Eremophila California Watch List I & splash zone alpestris actia homed lark Birds ABPAT02011 82 4 None None G5T3Q S3 null IUCN_LC- communities Least Meadow & seep Concern Eriastrum Santa Ana SB_RSABG- densifolium ssp. River Dicots PDPLM03035 30 1 Endangered Endangered G4T1 S1 1 B.1 Rancho Santa Chaparral sanctorum woollystar Ana Botanic Coastal scrub Garden SB_RSABG- Coastal scrub Eryngium San Diego Rancho Santa Valley & foothill aristulatumvar. button-celery Dicots PDAPIOZ042 79 1 Endangered Endangered G5T1 S1 1B.1 Ana Botanic grassland parishii Garden Vernal pool Wetland AFS_EN- Aquatic Endangered Klamath/North CDFW SSC- coast flowing Eucyclogobius tidewater Fish AFCQN04010 117 1 Endangered None G3 S3 null _ Species of waters Sacramento/San newberryi goby Special Joaquin flowing Concern IUCN VU- waters I South Vulnerable coast flowing waters BLM S- Sensitive Chaparral CDFW SSC- Cismontane Eumops perotis western Mammals AMACD02011 293 9 None None G5T4 S3S4 null Species of woodland califomicus mastiff bat Special Coastal scrub Concern Valley & foothill WBWG H- grassland High Priority SB RSABG- Coastal bluff Euphorbia misera cliff spurge Dicots PDEUPOQ1 BO 37 1 None None G5 S2 2B.2 Rancho Santa scrub I Coastal Ana Botanic scrub I Mojavean Garden desert scrub Helianthus Freshwater nuttallii ssp. Los Angeles Dicots PDAST4N102 8 2 None None GSTH SH 1A null marsh Marsh & parishii sunflower swamp Salt marsh Wetland Chaparral Horkelia cuneata mesa horkelia Dicots PDROSOW045 58 1 None None G4T1 S1 1B.1 USFS S- Cismontane var. puberula Sensitive woodland Coastal scrub CDFW SSC- Species of Riparian forest yellow- Special scrub Icteria virens breasted chat Birds ABPBX24010 84 2 None None G5 S3 null Concern Riparian Riparian IUCN_LC- woodland Least Concern Isocoma menziesii var. decumbent goldenbush Dicots PDAST57091 63 1 None None G3G5T2T3 S2 1 B.2 null Chaparral Coastal scrub decumbens IUCN_LC- Least Lower montane Lasionycteris silver-haired Mammals AMACCO2010 138 1 None None G5 S3S4 null Concern coniferous forest noctivagans bat WBWG_M- I Oldgrowth Medium Riparian forest Priority Broadleaved IUCN_LC- upland forest Least Cismontane Concern woodland Lasiurus cinereus hoary bat Mammals AMACC05030 235 1 None None G5 S4 null WBWG M- Lower montane Medium coniferous forest Priority I North coast coniferous forest CDFW SSC- Species of Lasiurus western Mammals AMACC05070 57 1 None None G5 S3 null Special Concern Desert wash xanthinus yellow bat IUCN_LC- Least Concern WBWG_H- High Priority BLM S- Alkali playa Lasthenia Sensitive Marsh &swamp � glabrassp. Coulters Dicots PDAST5LOA1 97 11 None None G4T2 S2 16.1 SB_RSABG- Salt marsh coulteri ri goldfields Rancho Santa Vernal pool Ana Botanic Wetland Garden BLM S- Sensitive CDFW FP- Fully Protected IUCN_NT- Brackish marsh Laterallus California Near Freshwater jamaicensis black rail Birds ABNME03041 241 1 None Threatened G3G4T1 S1 null Threatened I marsh Marsh & cotumiculus NABCI_RWL- swamp I Salt Red Watch marsh Wetland List USFWS_BCC- Birds of Conservation Concern Lepidium Robinson's Chaparral virginicum var. pepper-grass PDBRA1 M114 142 1 None None G5T3 S3 4.3 null Coastal scrub robinsonii Microtus CDFW SSG califomicus south coast Mammals AMAFF11035 7 2 None None G5T1T2 S1S2 null Species of null stephensi marsh vole Special Concern BLM _S- Lower montane Sensitive coniferous forest IUCN_LC- Riparian forest Myotis Yuma myotis Mammals AMACC01020 260 1 None None GS S4 null Least Riparian yumanensis Concern woodland WBWG LM- Upper montane Low-Medium coniferous forest Priority Nama stenocarpa mud nama Dicots PDHYDOAOHO 22 5 None None G4G5 S1 S2 2B.2 null Marsh & swamp Wetland SB RSABG- Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Brackish marsh Nasturtium Gambel's Garden I Freshwater gambelii watercress Dicots PDBRA270V0 12 1 Endangered Threatened G1 S1 1B.1 SBSBBG- marsh Marsh & San_ta swamp Wetland Barbara Botanic Garden Coastal scrub prostrate Meadow & seep Navarretia vernal pool Dicots PDPLMOCOQO 60 2 None None G2 S2 1 B.1 null I Valley & foothill prostrata navarretia grassland Vernal pool Wetland Nemacaulis SB RSABG- denudata var. coast woolly- Dicots PDPGNOG011 37 5 None None G3G4T2 S2 1 B.2 Rancho Santa Coastal dunes denudata heads Ana Botanic Garden CDFW SSC- Species of Special Concern Nyctinomops big free-tailed Mammals AMACD04020 32 1 None None G5 S3 null IUCN_LC- null macrotis bat Least Concern WBWG MH- H- Medium-High Medium-High Priority SB_RSABG- Orcuttia California Monocots PMPOA4G010 37 1 Endangered Endangered G1 S1 1 B.1 Rancho Santa Vernal pool califomica Oroutt grass Ana Botanic Wetland Garden CDF S- Sensitive CDFW WL- on aiaetus osprey Birds ABNKC01010 482 1 None None G5 S4 null Watch List Riparian forest haliaetu IUCN_LC- Least Concern wandering IUCN_NT- Marsh & swamp Panoquina errans (=saltmarsh) 1 Insects IILEP84030 14 5 None None G4G5 S2 null Near skipper Threatened Wetland Passerculus Belding's Marsh & swamp sandwichensis savannah Birds ABPBX99015 36 8 None Endangered G5T3 S3 null null Wetland beldingi sparrow Pentachaeta Allen's Coastal scrub aurea ssp. allenii pentachaeta Dicots PDAST6XO21 8 2 None None G4T1 S1 1 B.1 null Valley & foothill grassland Perognathus CDFW_SSC- longimembris Pacific pocket Mammals AMAFDO1042 13 2 Endangered None G5T1 S1 null Species of Coastal scrub pacificus mouse Special Concern SB RSABG- Phacelia stellaris Brand's star Dicots PDHYD00510 15 1 None None G1 S1 1 B.1 Rancho Santa Coastal dunes phacelia Ana Botanic Coastal scrub Garden Chaparral 11 Cismontane BLM S- Woodland Sensitive Coastal bluff CDFW SSC- scrub I Coastal Species of scrub Desert Phrynosoma coast homed Reptiles ARACF12100 728 13 None None G3G4 S3S4 null Special wash Pinon & blainvillii lizard Concern I juniper IUCN LC- Woodlands Least Riparian scrub Concern Riparian woodland Valley & foothill grassland CDFW SSC- Species of Polioptila coastal Special Coastal bluff califomica California Birds ABPBJ08081 809 60 Threatened None G3T2 S2 null Concern I scrub I Coastal califomica gnatcatcher NABCI_YWL- scrub Yellow Watch List Chaparral Quercus dumosa Nuttall's scrub Dicots PDFAG050D0 148 4 None None G3 S3 1 B.1 USFS S- Closed-cone oak Sensitive coniferous forest Coastal scrub CDFW—FP- Fully Marsh & swamp Rallus longirostris light-footed Birds ABNME05014 30 5 Endangered Endangered G5T1T2 S1 null Protected I Salt marsh levipes clapper rail NABCI_RWL- Wetland Red Watch List BLM S- Sensitive I Riparian scrub Riparia riparia bank swallow Birds ABPAU08010 296 2 None Threatened G5 S2 null IUCN LC- Riparian Least woodland Concern CDFW—SSC- Species of Special Concern I UCN_LC- Least Rynchops niger black skimmer Birds ABNNM14010 6 1 None None G5 S2 null Concern Alkali playa NABCI_YWL- Sand shore Yellow Watch List USFWS BCC- Birds of Conservation Concern Chaparral Senecio chaparral Dicots PDAST81-1060 47 1 None None G3? S2 2B.2 null Cismontane aphanactis ragwort woodland Coastal scrub Alkali playa Chaparral Coastal scrub Sidalcea Salt Spring Dicots PDMAL110J0 15 2 None None G4 S2 26.2 USFS S- Lower montane neomexicana checkerbloom Sensitive coniferous forest Mojavean desert scrub Wetland southernCDFW SSG Sorex omatus California Mammals AMABA01104 4 2 None None G5T1? S1 null Species of Salt marsh salicomicus saltmarsh Special shrew Concern Southern Southern California California Arroyo Arroyo Inland CARE2330CA 4 1 None None GNR SNR null null null Chub/Santa Ana Chub/Santa Waters Sucker Stream Ana Sucker Stream Southern Southern Coast Coast Live Riparian CTT61310CA 246 9 None None G4 S4 null null Riparian forest Live Oak Riparian Oak Riparian Forest Forest Southern SouthernCoastal Marsh &swamp Salt Marsh Coastal Salt Marsh CTT52120CA 24 7 None None G2 S2.1 null null Wetland Marsh Southern Southern Cottonwood Cottonwood Willow Riparian Willow Riparian CTT61330CA 111 2 None None G3 S3.2 null null Riparian forest Forest Riparian Forest Southern Dune Southern Dune CTT21330CA 10 2 None None G1 S1.1 null null Coastal dunes Scrub Dune Scrub Southern Southern Dune CTT21230CA 23 3 None None G2 S2.1 null null Coastal dunes Foredunes Foredunes Southern Southern Sycamore Alder Sycamore Riparian CTT62400CA 230 2 None None G4 S4 null null Riparian Riparian Alder Riparian woodland Woodland Woodland BLM S - Sensitive Cismontane CDFW_SSC- woodland western Species of Coastal scrub Spea hammondii spadefoct Amphibians AAABF02020 425 3 None None G3 S3 null Special Valley & foothill Concern grassland IUCN_NT- Vernal pool Near Wetland Threatened CDFW_FP- FuIIy Stemula California Birds ABNNM08103 67 9 Endangered Endangered G4T2T3Q S2 null Protected Alkali playa antillarum browni least tem NABCI_RWL- Wetland Red Watch List estuary Marsh & swamp Suaeda esteroa seablite Dicots PDCHEOPODO 23 7 None None G3 S2 1B.2 null Salt marsh Wetland Cismontane woodland BLM S- Coastal scrub Symphyotrichum San Sensitive Lower montane defoliatum Bernardino Dicots PDASTE80C0 76 7 None None G2 S2 1B.2 USFS S- coniferous forest aster Sensitive Marsh & swamp Meadow & seep I Valley & foothill grassland Alkali marsh Alkali playa Alpine I Alpine dwarf scrub Bog & fen Brackish marsh Broadleaved upland forest Chaparral Chenopod scrub Cismontane woodland Closed -cone coniferous forest Coastal bluff scrub Coastal dunes Coastal prairie Coastal scrub Desert dunes Desert wash l Freshwater marsh I Great Basin grassland Great Basin scrub I Interior CDFW_SSC- dunes i Ione Species of formation American Special Joshua tree Taxidea taxus badger Mammals AMAJF04010 478 1 None None G5 S3 null Concern woodland IUCN LC- Limestone Least Lower montane Concern coniferous forest Marsh & swamp Meadow & seep I Mojavean desert scrub Montane dwarf scrub I North coast coniferous forest Oldgrowth Pavement plain Redwood l Riparian forest Riparian scrub Riparian woodland I Salt marsh I Sonoran desert scrub Sonoran thorn woodland Ultramafic Upper montane coniferous forest Upper Sonoran scrub I Valley & foothill grassland Trigonoscuta Dorothy's EI dorothea Segundo Insects IICOL51021 4 2 None None G1T1 S1 null null Coastal dunes dorothea Dune weevil Aquatic mimic tryonia Brackish marsh Tryonia imitator (=California Mollusks IMGASJ7040 39 2 None None G2 S2 null IUCN DD- Estuary brackishwater Data Deficient Lagoon I Marsh snail) & swamp I Salt marsh I Wetland Valley Valley Valley & foothill Needlegrass Needlegrass Herbaceous CTT42110CA 45 1 None None G3 S3.1 null null grassland Grassland Grassland SB RSABG- Verbesina dissita big-leaved Dicots PDAST9R050 2 1 Threatened Threatened G2G3 S1 1B.1 Rancho Santa Chaparral crownbeard Ana Botanic Coastal scrub Garden IUCN_NT- Near Riparian forest Vireo bellii least Bell's Birds ABPBW01114 469 15 Endangered Endangered G5T2 S2 null Threatened I Riparian scrub pusillus vireo NABCI YWL- Riparian Yellow Watch woodland List Plant List 49 matches found. Click on scientific name for details Search Criteria Found in 9 Quads around 33117F8 Scientific Name Common Name Family Lifeform Rare PlantState Global Rank Rank Rank Abronia maritima red sand -verbena Nyctaginaceae perennial herb 4.2 S3S4 G4 Abronia villosa var. aurita chaparral sand- Nyctaginaceae annual herb 1 B.1 S2 G5T2T3 verbena Aphanisma blitoides aphanisma Chenopodiaceae annual herb 1 B.2 S2 G3G4 Astragalus pycnostachyus var. Ventura marsh milk- Fabaceae perennial herb 1 B.1 S1 G2T1 lanosissimus vetch Atriplex coulteri Coulter's saltbush Chenopodiaceae perennial herb 1 B.2 S2 G2 Atriplex Pacifica South Coast saltscale Chenopodiaceae annual herb 1 B.2 S2 G3G4 Atriplex parishii Parish's brittlescale Chenopodiaceae annual herb 1 B.1 S1 G1 G2 Atriplex serenana var. Davidson's saltscale Chenopodiaceae annual herb 1 B.2 S1 G5T1 davidsonii Calochortus catalinae Catalina mariposa lily Liliaceae perennial 4.2 S4 G4 bulbiferous herb Calochortus weedii var. intermediate mariposa perennial intermedius lily Liliaceae bulbiferous herb 1 B.2 S2 G3G4T2 Camissoniopsis lewisii Lewis' evening- Onagraceae annual herb 3 S4 G4 primrose Centromadia parryi ss. southern tarplant Asteraceae annual herb 1 B.1 S2 G3T2 australis Chaenactis glabriuscula var. Orcutt's pincushion Asteraceae annual herb 1 B.1 S1 G5T1T2 orcuttiana Chloropvron maritimum ssp. salt marsh bird's -beak Orobanchaceae annual herb 1 B.2 S1 G4?T1 maritimum (hemiparasitic) Chorizanthe parryi var. San Fernando Valley Polygonaceae annual herb 1 B.1 S1 G2T1 fernandina spineflower Cistanthe maritima seaside cistanthe Montiaceae annual herb 4.2 S3 G3G4 Coma rostaphvlis diversifolia summer holly Ericaceae perennial 1 B.2 S2 G3T2 ssp. diversifolia evergreen shrub Convolvulus simulans small -flowered Convolvulaceae annual herb 4.2 S4 G4 morning-glory Deinandra paniculata paniculate tarplant Asteraceae annual herb 4.2 S4 G4 Dichondra occidentalis western dichondra Convolvulaceae perennial 4.2 S3S4 G3G4 rhizomatous herb Dudleva multicaulis many -stemmed Crassulaceae perennial herb 1 B.2 S2 G2 dudleya Dudleya stolonifera Laguna Beach dudleya Crassulaceae Perennial 1 B.1 S1 G1 stoloniferous herb Eryngium aristulatum var. San Diego button- Apiaceae annual / perennial 1 B.1 S1 G5T1 arp ishii celery herb Euphorbia misera cliff spurge Euphorbiaceae perennial shrub 2B.2 S2 G5 Helianthus nuttallii ssp. Los Angeles sunflower Asteraceae perennial 1A SH G5TH arp ishll rhizomatous herb Hordeum intercedens vernal barley Poaceae annual herb 3.2 S3S4 G3G4 Horkelia cuneata var. puberula mesa horkelia Rosaceae perennial herb 1 B.1 S1 G4T1 Isocoma menziesii var. decumbent Asteraceae perennial shrub 1 B.2 S2 G3G5T2T3 decumbens goldenbush Juglans californica Southern California Juglandaceae perennial 4.2 S3 G3 black walnut deciduous tree Juncus acutus ssp. Ieopoldii southwestern spiny Juncaceae perennial 4.2 S4 G5T5 rush rhizomatous herb Lasthenia glabrata ss. Coulter's goldfields Asteraceae annual herb 1 B.1 S2 G4T2 coulteri Lepidium virginicum var. Robinson's pepper- Brassicaceae annual herb 4.3 S3 G5T3 robinsonii grass Lycium californicum California box-thorn Solanaceae perennial shrub 4.2 S4 G4 Malacothrix saxatilis var. cliff malacothrix Asteraceae perennial 4.2 S4 G5T4 saxatilis rhizomatous herb Nama stenocarpa mud nama Boraginaceae annual / perennial 2B.2 S1 S2 G4G5 herb Nasturtium gambelii Gambel's water cress Brassicaceae Perennial 1 B.1 S1 G1 rhizomatous herb Navarretia prostrata prostrate vernal pool Polemoniaceae annual herb 1 B.1 S2 G2 navarretia Nemacaulis denudata var. coast woolly-heads Polygonaceae annual herb 1 B.2 S2 G3G4T2 denudata Orcuttia californica California Orcutt grass Poaceae annual herb 1B.1 S1 G1 Pentachaeta aurea ssp. allenii Allen's pentachaeta Asteraceae annual herb 1 B.1 S1 G4T1 Phacelia ramosissima var. south coast branching Boraginaceae perennial herb 3.2 S3 G5?T3 austrolitoralis phacelia Phacelia stellaris Brand's star phacelia Boraginaceae annual herb 1 B.1 S1 G1 Quercus dumosa Nuttall's scrub oak Fagaceae perennial 1 B.1 S3 G3 evergreen shrub Sagittaria sanfordii Sanford's arrowhead Alismataceae perennial 1 B.2 S3 G3 rhizomatous herb Senecio aphanactis chaparral ragwort Asteraceae annual herb 2B.2 S2 G3? Sidalcea neomexicana salt spring Malvaceae perennial herb 2B.2 S2 G4 checkerbloom Suaeda esteroa estuary seablite Chenopodiaceae perennial herb 1 B.2 S2 G3 Symphyotrichum defoliatum San Bernardino aster Asteraceae perennial 1 B.2 S2 G2 rhizomatous herb Verbesina dissita big-leaved crownbeard Asteraceae perennial herb 1 B.1 S1 G2G3 Suggested Citation CNPS, Rare Plant Program. 2016. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-02). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Website http://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed 06 January 2016]. Search the Inventory Simple Search Advanced Search Glossary Information About the Inventory About the Rare Plant Program CNPS Home Page About CNPS Join CNPS © Copyright 2010-2014 California Native Plant Society. All rights reserved. Contributors The Calflora Database The California Lichen Society APPENDIX C Cultural Resources Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) ESA / 150652 Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 (916)373-3710 (916) 373-5471 FAX December 24, 2015 Vanessa Ortiz ESA Sent by Email: vortiz@esassoc.com Number of Pages: 4 RE: Bristol Street Autoplex Project -D150652.00, City of Costa Mesa, Orange County Dear Ms. Ortiz: Attached is a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural. places located within the boundaries of the above referenced project. Government Code §65352.3 requires local governments to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to tribal cultural resources in creating or amending general plans, including specific plans. As of July 1, 2015, Public Resources Code Sections 21080.1, 21080.3.1 and 21080.3.2 require public agencies to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the NAHC for the purpose mitigating impacts to tribal cultural resources under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21080.1(d): Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a. tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that' the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section. The law does not preclude agencies from initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated with their jurisdictions. The NAHC believes that in fact that this is the best practice to ensure that tribes are consulted commensurate with the intent of the law. In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21080.1(d), formal notification must include a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation. The NAHC believes that agencies should also include with their notification letters information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the APE, such as: 1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to: ■ A listing of any and all known cultural resources have already been recorded on or. adjacent to the APE; ■ Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; ■ If the probability is low, moderate, or high that cultural resources are located in the APE. ■ Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the potential APE; and ■ If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. 2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including: ■ Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measurers. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for pubic disclosure in accordance with Government Code Section 6254.10. 3. The results of any Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through Native American Heritage Commission. A SLF search was completed with negative results. 4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the potential APE; and 5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the potential APE. Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS is not exhaustive, and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a cultural place. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource. This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the case that they do, having the information beforehand well help to facilitate the consultation process. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to assure that our consultation list contains current information. If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: rw_nahc@pacbell.net. Sincerely, Rob W od Associate Environmental Planner Native American Heritage Commission Tribal Consultation List Orange County December 24, 2015 Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Aciachemen Nation Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal council Chairperson, Matias Belardes Robert F. Dorame, Tribal Chair/Cultural Resources 32161 Avenida Los Amigos Juaneno P.O. Box 490 Gabrielino Tongva San Juan Capisttrano , CA 92675 Bellflower CA 90707 (949) 293-8522 gtongva@verizon.net (949) 444-4340, (Cell) (562) 761-6417 Voice/Fax Tongva Ancestral Territorial Tribal Nation John Tommy Rosas, Tribal Admin. Gabrielino Tongva tattnlaw@gmail.com (310) 570-6567 Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians Anthony Morales; Chairperson P.O. Box 693 Gabrielino Tongva San Gabriel CA 91778 GTTribalcouncil @ aol.com (626) 483-3564 Cell Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Adolph 'Bud' Sepulveda, Vice Chairperson P.O. Box 25828 Juaneno Santa Ana , CA 92799 bssepul@yahoo.net (714) 838-3270 (714) 914-1812 Cell Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Sonia Johnston, Tribal Chairperson P.O. Box 25628 Santa Ana , CA 92799 Juaneno sonia Johnston 9 sbcglobal. net Gabrielino [Tongva Nation Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Sandonne Goad, Chairperson Anita Espinoza 106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St., #231 Gabrielino Tongva 639 Holten Road Los Angeles , CA 90012 Talent , Or 97540 Juaneno sgoad @gabrielino-tongva.com neta777@sbcglobal.net (951) 807-0479 Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation United Coalition to Protect Panhe (UCPP) Teresa Romero, Chairwoman Rebecca Robles 31411-A La Matanza Street Juaneno 119 Avenida San Fernando San Juan Capistrano , CA 92675 San Clemente , CA 92672 tromero@juaneno.com rebroblesi @gmail.com Juaneno (949) 488-3484 (949) 573-3138 (530) 354-5876 Cell This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list applicable only for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed Bristol Street Autoplex Project - D150652.00, City of Costa Mesa, orange County. Native American Heritage Commission Tribal Consultation List Orange County December 24, 2015 Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe Bernie Acuna, Co -Chairperson 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1100 Los Angeles , CA 90067 Gabrielino (310) 428-5690 Cell Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation Joyce Perry, Tribal Manager 4955 Paseo Segovia Juaneno Irvine , CA 92612 kaamalam@gmail.com (949) 293-8522 Gabriel ino-Tongva Tribe Linda Candelaria, Co -Chairperson 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1100 Los Angeles CA 90067 Gabrielino (626) 676-1184 Cell Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation Andrew Salas, Chairperson P.O. Box 393 Covina , CA 91723 gabrielenoindians@yahoo.com Gabrielino (626) 926-4131 Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe Conrad Acuna 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1100 Los Angeles , CA 90067 Gabrielino This list is current only as of the date of this document. Gabrielino /Tongva Nation Sam Dunlap, Cultural Resources Director P.O. Box 86908 Gabrielino Tongva Los Angeles , CA 90086 samd u n l ap @ earth l i n k. n et (909) 262-9351 Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list applicable only for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed Bristol Street Autoplex Project - D150652.00, City of Costa Mesa, Orange County. Environmental Science Associates 626 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attn: Vanessa Ortiz, Cultural Resources Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County goo Exposition Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90007 tel 213.763.DINO www.nhm.org Vertebrate Paleontology Section Telephone: (213) 763-3325 Fax: (213) 746-7431 e-mail: smcleod@nhm.org 5 January 2016 re: Paleontological resources for the proposed Bristol Street Autoplex Project, ESA Project # D150652.00, in the City of Costa Mesa, Orange County, project area Dear Vanessa: I have thoroughly searched our paleontology collection records for the locality and specimen data for the proposed Bristol Street Autoplex Project, ESA Project # D150652.00, in the City of Costa Mesa, Orange County, project area as outlined on the portion of the Newport Beach USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on 10 December 2015. We have no vertebrate fossil localities that lie directly within the boundaries of the proposed project area, but we do have localities nearby from sedimentary deposits similar to those that occur at depth in the proposed project area. There may be younger Quaternary Alluvium in the lowest lying portions of the proposed project area derived from the drainage that flows through the area. Otherwise, according to the geologic mapping, the proposed project area has surface exposures of marine younger Quaternary Terrace deposits, although our vertebrate fossil localities in this area almost always contain terrestrial fossil vertebrates. These deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils, at least in the uppermost layers, but they are usually underlain by older Quaternary deposits that frequently do contain significant vertebrate fossils. Our closest vertebrate fossil locality from these deposits is LACM 4219, west-southwest of the proposed project area in a roadcut for the Newport Freeway near Santa Isabel Avenue, that produced fossil sea turtle, Cheloniidae, and camel, Camelidae, bones in coarse poorly sorted friable sands about 30 feet below the grade of Inspiring wonder, discovery and responsibility for our natural and cultural worlds. Newport Boulevard. Further to the southwest of the proposed project area, near the intersection of 19"' Street and Anaheim Avenue, our locality LACM 3267 produced a fossil specimen of undetermined elephant, Proboscidea. Just north of west of the proposed project area, along Adams Avenue near the top of the mesa bluffs east of the Santa Ana River, our locality LACM 1339, produced fossil specimens of mammoth, Mammuthus, and camel, Camelidae, bones in sand approximately 15 feet below the top of the mesa that is overlain by shell bearing silts and sands. We further have a large number of localities from the marine and terrestrial Late Pleistocene terraces deposits on the east side of Upper Newport Bay. Those localities have produced an extensive composite fauna. Surface grading or very shallow excavations in the younger Quaternary Alluvium exposed in the proposed project area probably will not uncover significant vertebrate fossil remains. Deeper excavations that extend down into older Quaternary deposits, however, may well encounter significant fossil vertebrate specimens. Any substantial excavations in the proposed project area, therefore, should be monitored closely to quickly and professionally recover any fossil remains discovered while not impeding development. Also, sediment samples should be collected and processed to determine the small fossil potential in the proposed project area. Any fossils recovered during mitigation should be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution for the benefit of current and future generations. This records search covers only the vertebrate paleontology records of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. It is not intended to be a thorough paleontological survey of the proposed project area covering other institutional records, a literature survey, or any potential on-site survey. Sincerely, Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D. Vertebrate Paleontology enclosure: invoice APPENDIX D Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT BRISTOL AUTOPLEX 375 BRISTOL STREET, COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EMS PROJECT NUMBER EMS547 SANDERSON J. RAY DEVELOPMENT 2699 WHITE ROAD, IRVINE, CA 92614 NOVEMBER 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT BRISTOL AUTOPLEX 375 BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EMS PROJECT NUMBER EMS547 NOVEMBER 2015 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Financially Based,Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel (949) 679-9500 ,,,. `" ; Fax (949) 679-9501 CERTIFICATION All engineering and geologic information, conclusions, and recommendations in this document were prepared under the supervision of and reviewed by an Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Professional Geologist in the State of California. Further and to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, the work was performed by professionals who meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and these professionals have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject property. Our investigation conforms to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI, 40 CFR Part 312) as well as ASTM International's (ASTM) Standard E 1527-13 titled "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process". — o���S�pNAL �40 a ANTHONY F. SEVERN -4 N No. 385 • FBF CAL"�� �D���^.✓�-t �7 �� e Anthony F. Severini Date President Professional Geologist No. 3852 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work.................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Results of Investigation.................................................................................................... 2 2 Introduction.............................................................................................................................7 2.1 Purpose............................................................................................................................. 7 2. 1.1 Special Terms and Conditions...................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Methodology.................................................................................................................7 2.2 Site Description................................................................................................................ 8 2.2.1 Site Location................................................................................................................. 8 2.2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics.................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Description of Structures, Roads and other Improvements .......................................... 9 2.2.4 Information Reported by Property Engineers............................................................... 9 2.2.5 Current Uses of the Property........................................................................................ 9 2.2.6 Past Uses of the Property .............................................................................................. 9 2.2.7 Past and Current Uses of Adjoining Properties............................................................ 9 2.3 Records Review................................................................................................................ 9 2.3.1 Standard Environmental Records Sources: Federal, State, Tribal and Local ............... 9 2.3.2 Physical Setting Sources............................................................................................. 13 2.3.3 Historical Use Information......................................................................................... 13 2.3.3.1 Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map Review................................................................ 14 2.3.3.2 Historical USGS Topographic Map Review ....................................................... 14 2.3.3.3 Aerial Photograph Review.................................................................................. 14 2.3.3.4 City Directory Abstract....................................................................................... 15 2.3.3.5 Building Permit Report ....................................................................................... 15 2.3.4 Previous Environmental Reports................................................................................ 15 2.3.5 Additional Record Sources......................................................................................... 17 2.3.6 ASTM E 1527-05 User Questionnaire....................................................................... 18 2.4 Information from Site Reconnaissance and Interviews .................................................. 18 2.4.1 Hazardous Substances in Connection with Identified Uses ....................................... 22 2.4.2 Other Hazardous Substance Containers and Unidentified Substance Containers...... 22 2.4.3 Storage Tanks............................................................................................................. 22 2.4.4 Indications of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ...................................................... 22 2.4.5 Indications of Solid Waste Disposal........................................................................... 22 2.4.6 Physical Setting Analysis, if Migrating Substances are an Issue ............................... 22 2.4.7 Indications of Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) ................................................. 22 2.4.8 Radon Accumulation Potential................................................................................... 22 2.4.9 Indications of Lead Based Paint................................................................................. 23 3 Data Gaps...............................................................................................................................24 4 Findings and Conclusions.....................................................................................................25 5 Bibliography..........................................................................................................................30 Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Map Photographs Appendices Appendix A Qualifications of Environmental Professionals Appendix B EDR Radius MapTM with GeochecO Appendix C EDR Environmental LienSearclP Report Appendix D EDR Property Tax Map Report Appendix E Certified Sanborn Map Report Appendix F EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Appendix G EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Appendix H EDR City Directory Abstract Appendix I EDR Building Permit Report Appendix J Previous Environmental Reports Appendix K Agency Documents Appendix L ASTM E 1527-05 User Questionnaire 1 Executive Summary Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. (EMS) is pleased to present this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) for the property located at 375 Bristol Street in the City of Costa Mesa, Orange County, California 92626 (the "Site", see Figures 1 and 2). Sanderson J. Ray Development (SJRD) retained EMS on August 19, 2015 to perform the Phase I ESA in support of redevelopment of the 375 Bristol Street property. Our investigation conforms to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI, 40 CFR Part 312) as well as ASTM International's (ASTM) Standard E 1527-13 titled "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process". 1.1 Background The Site consists of three commercial buildings used primarily by businesses performing auto maintenance and repair work on a 3.18 acre parcel of land. The parcel number for the Site is 119-200- 33. The Site is located on the southwestern side of Bristol Street to the northwest of the Newport Beach Golf Course, in a primarily commercial area. 1.2 Scope of Work EMS performed the following scope of work in support of developing this Phase I ESA: • EMS performed a detailed investigation into the historical use of the Site. Our historical investigation entailed the review of reasonably ascertainable documents from standard sources from the early 1900's to the present. • EMS reviewed executive summaries of previous reports documenting environmental conditions at the Site and adjacent properties. • EMS performed a review of reasonably ascertainable regulatory agency information regarding hazardous material use, disposal, and contaminated property information for the Site and surrounding area. This review included a search for environmental liens as well as activity and use limitations (AULs) on the Site. • EMS contacted the following public agencies for additional information for the Site: the EPA; the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC); the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR); the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA); the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB); and, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD). • EMS was supplied with an ASTM E 1527-13 User Questionnaire completed by Mr. Scott Rimland, President of Cardinal Development Company. • EMS performed an inspection of the Site on September 22, 2015. EMS was provided with site information by Mr. Scott Rimland, President of Cardinal Development Company and Torrey Chacon, Property Manager with Cardinal Development Company. 1.3 Results of Investigation EMS performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 for 375 Bristol Street in the City of Costa Mesa, Orange County, California 92626. Any exception to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 3 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions, Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions, Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions or De Minimis Conditions in connection with the Site with the following exceptions: • EMS performed an inspection of the Site on September 22, 2015. Many of the tenant suites are used as automotive maintenance and repair shops. There is an on-site Property Manager and all tenant spaces are routinely inspected and checked for major environmental issues by the Property Manager. In general, housekeeping practices are good with minor exceptions. EMS did not observe any use of large quantities of solvents or automotive cleaning products; only small amounts of solvents were observed in aerosol cans. • The Site inspection did not reveal the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions with the exception of the following: Some suites with automotive maintenance and repair shops have 55 - gallon drums that lack secondary containment; The three -stage clarifier on the Site is a concern for subsurface contamination; EMS did not observe solvents being used for the cleaning of auto parts; however, the Site has been an auto maintenance and repair complex for a number of years and it is possible solvents have been used in the past to clean parts; The drains in each suite leading to the clarifier are a concern for shallow subsurface contamination; Staining inside some of the suites and in the rear of the central building of the complex is a concern for potential subsurface contamination of petroleum products; Suites with hydraulic lifts may have leaked at some time in the past and therefore are a concern for shallow subsurface contamination; and, the small concrete block structure formerly used by Jiffy Lube is also a concern for shallow subsurface contamination as it was used to store either oil or waste oil. • Some of the automotive maintenance shops generate waste oil that is considered a regulated waste in California. The Facility and Manifest Data (HAZNET) database is information extracted from copies of hazardous waste manifests received by DTSC each year. The following businesses on the HAZNET database were listed at the Site: ALL FORDS & CHEVY TR, BENZE & BEAMERS, JIFFY LUBE #861, COMPETITION ST, SAEILO MOTORS CA INC, FOREIGN WORKS INC, FOREIGN WORKS THE, SADDLEBACK SMOG & RE, AUTOCARE EXPRESS, DANS AUTOCARE EXPRE, CALIFORNIA COVENTRY, BRISTOL AUTOPLEX, EURO WEST INC, THE DING KING and CALIFORNIA BRAKE WOR. A few of the descriptions provided in the EDR report describe the waste as containing oil; however, a majority of the listings do not have a description listed for the waste. Based on the waste descriptions listed and the number of listings for automotive maintenance and repair shops, EMS believes the HAZNET listings represent a Recognized Environmental Concern. • The Site address was listed as JIFFY LUBE, JIFFY LUBE #0861 and JIFFY LUBE NO 861 on the SWEEPS UST, RCRA-SQG, FINDS and UST databases. Two of the databases listed have updated and specific information for the JIFFY LUBE listing and they are the RCRA-SQG database which lists sites that generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste and the UST database which lists active UST facilities gathered from local regulatory agencies. According to the EDR report the number of USTs listed at Jiffy Lube is six and tank use is described as M.V. Fuel. Storage for JIFFY LUBE is listed as product and capacity for each tank 2 is listed as 2,000, 1,000, 1,000, 2,000, 220 and 220. According to EDR no violations were found for Jiffy Lube. During the site walk EMS was informed that Jiffy Lube did not have USTs and it appears the listed tanks were ASTs stored in the basement of Suite 110. EMS was unable to review any environmental reports regarding investigations into these ASTs; therefore, EMS believes these ASTs on the Site represent a Recognized Environmental Condition. • The Tenant Environmental Site Assessment, Bristol Autoplex was prepared by Anne M. Brown of Environmental Management Consulting in May 1997 to evaluate environmental conditions at the Bristol Autoplex property. Findings and recommendations from the report are as follows: 1. According to Mr. Searcy, the clarifier is cleaned out about once a year. In order to keep the system operating properly, it is recommended that the clarifier be put on a biannual cleanout program. 2. Secondary containment has not been provided beneath the solvent baths in the auto servicing units. Stains were observed on the floor beneath each of these units, and over time, this could create an environmental contamination problem since some solvents can penetrate through unsealed concrete slabs, and/or find pathways to underlying soil via cracks. It is recommended that all tenants with solvent baths provide secondary containment such as a plastic spill pan. These pans are readily available through Safety Supply companies. 3. To ensure that tenants and others are aware that hazardous wastes are not to be disposed of in or around the dumpsters, it is recommended that the property manager post signs stating NO WASTE CHEMICAL OR BATTERY DISPOSAL ALLOWED on each of the dumpster enclosures. 4. Mop water from those tenants not connected to the trench/clarifier system is discharged into sinks or floor drains. Since this water could contain significant quantities of oil and other debris, this practice over time could result in clogged drains. It is recommended that a means of discharging this water into the clarifier system be provided. This way, oily residues and debris can be collected before discharge to the sewer system. 5. Imari Sushi stores their waste grease in a container behind the shop. The asphalt in the immediate area was covered with a grease residue creating both a potential health & safety problem. It is recommended that secondary containment be provided beneath the grease container and grease spills be cleaned up on a routine basis. 6. Ding King is using Unit #45 itself as a paint booth which appears to present a potential contamination problem for the unit as well potential health/safety problems for users and possibly other tenants. It is recommended that Ding King contact the South Coast Air Quality Management District concerning the necessity of installing and operating a controlled paint booth. 7. No evidence of a monitoring well was observed on the property during the site visit. If the owner is aware of a monitoring well on the property, it should be determined if the well is still necessary. If not, it is recommended that the well be removed, preferably by the company that installed the well. EMS was informed by the property manager that there was not a paint booth at Unit #45 and the area mentioned in the report was actually just a corner of the building used for small "touch up" jobs on repaired vehicles. EMS believes the lack of secondary containment beneath solvent baths and the disposal of mop water into sinks and floor drains represent a Recognized Environmental Condition in relation to the Site. 3 • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) RCRA-LQG and RCRA-SQG lists sites that generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste. COUNTRY STYLE CLEANE located at 320 Bristol St is located adjacent and to the northwest of the Site. This listing appears to be for a dry cleaner and is potentially up -gradient of the Site based on a Quarterly Monitoring Report prepared for the Bristol Plaza Chevron at 300 Bristol St; therefore, EMS believes it represents a Recognized Environmental Condition. • One location was listed on the DRYCLEANERS database which lists drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers and is listed at 320 Bristol St with a facility name of REDHILL DRYCLEANERS. What appears to be the same location without a facility name was also listed at the address of 320 Bristol St on the EDR US Hist Cleaners database. This database lists what EDR refers to as "High Risk Historical Records" and is a collection of potential dry cleaner sites. Based on this listing being approximately 0.215 mile and potentially up -gradient from the Site; EMS believes the listing for 320 Bristol St represent a Recognized Environmental Condition. • The Site is listed as J. RAY CONSTRUCTION and J RAY SANDERSON/CARD on the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST), Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List (HIST CORTESE) and The Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank (RGA LUST) databases. The LUST database contains an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents; the HIST CORTESE is a database no longer updated by the government agencies; and, RGA LUST is a database that provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases. All the listings for J. RAY CONSTRUCTION and J RAY SANDERSON/CARD appear to be for one case of a leaking underground storage tank listed on the LUST database. According to the EDR report, the LUST case has a status of "Completed — Case Closed" as of June 18, 1991. Based on the status of the LUST case, EMS believes the listings mentioned above represent a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. • The Quarterly Monitoring Report Prepared For the Property Located at Bristol Plaza Chevron prepared by Centec Engineering (Centec) on January 21, 2011 was prepared for the former Chevron station at 300 Bristol St. Site assessment at the property began in 1996 and six groundwater monitoring wells, one vapor extraction well and four air sparging wells were installed at the site. Investigation results for the site indicated that soil and groundwater were impacted by low to moderate levels of petroleum hydrocarbons. Remediation at the site was performed using high vacuum vapor and dual phase extraction, complimented by air sparging. This was accomplished using a mobile unit as opposed to a fixed unit. The groundwater gradient in this report was measured to be to the south-southwest. The results from post -remediation monitoring found no detectable levels of MTBE or benzene remained in groundwater and Centec felt closure of the site was appropriate. On January 8, 2013 the OCHCA submitted a Remedial Action Completion Certification to Bristol Plaza Chevron at 300 Bristol St. Based on the completion certification from the OCHCA and its location relative to the Site, EMS believes Bristol Plaza Chevron represents a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. • The EDR report identified 10 Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) cases within 0.5 mile of the Site. The LUST database contains an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. One of the LUST cases listed in the EDR report was for a facility located within 0.25 mile and potentially up -gradient of the Site. The facility was listed as UNOCAL #5909 located at 1476 Bristol St. According to the EDR report the status for this facility was listed as "Completed — Case Closed". Based on its status and location, EMS believes UNOCAL #5909 represents a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. • The EDR report also supplied information from databases that list underground storage tanks in the area of the Site. The databases included were Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS UST), Historical UST Registered Database (HIST UST) and The Facility Inventory Database (Ca FID UST). The EDR report listed two facilities with the names of R K B INVESTMENTS and KOBOWAY INC at the address of 380 Clinton St. This address was listed on the CERCLIS-NFRAP database which is a list of archived sites in which assessment has been completed and the EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List. Based on the distance, location and its listing on the CERCLIS-NFRAP database, EMS believes the 380 Clinton St listing represents a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. • The 2014 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Old Fuel Farm John Wayne Airport was prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler (Amec) on January 30, 2015 for the Old Fuel Farm located near the southeastern corner of the John Wayne Airport (JWA) property. This fuel farm supplied the fuel for airport operations prior to the construction of the new commercial fueling facility in 1990. According to the report the RWQCB in 1988 issued a Clean-up and Abatement Order to JWA and all 30 fuel tanks were subsequently removed. Soil and groundwater were primarily impacted by Jet Fuel and to a lesser extent aviation gasoline. MTBE was also detected in groundwater samples after the installation of a gasoline tank which was eventurally replaced. According to the report there are 31 monitoring wells, 12 of which have contained free floating product and have used canisters to skim free product. This method of product removal was implemented for over ten years and discontinued in 2007 due to diminishing returns. JWA at this time requested site closure and was denied by the RWQCB. As part of their monitoring and sampling it appears AMEC subcontracts a company to remove free product from wells on the site. Shallow groundwater flow beneath JWA is generally to the west and southwest. During this reporting period 10 of 31 wells contained free product. The conclusions in the report state that "the distribution of free product is generally similar to past monitoring events and suggests generally two separate areas of free product presence". EMS reviewed the AMEC Free Product Distribution Map supplied in the report and it appears the free product measured in the monitoring wells does not appear to have moved off-site. Based on the regular removal of free product from on-site wells, EMS believes the JWA facility represents a Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition. Although indoor air quality is specifically listed as a non -scope consideration under Section 13.1.5.7 of ASTM E 1527-13, Environmental Professionals cannot eliminate migration of vapors from the ASTM E 1527-13 Phase I ESA scope of work as this would result in the Phase I ESA being non -AAI compliant. ASTM has released ASTM E 2600-10 Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions. The Guidance is directed at identifying the likelihood for migrating vapors to encroach onto a target property creating a VEC. The potential findings of the ASTM E 2600-10 screening are the following: • A VEC exists or is likely to exist; or, • A VEC can be ruled out because it does not exist or is not likely to exist. ASTM E 2600-10 is a two Tier process. Tier 1 focuses on known or suspected contaminated 5 properties identified during the Phase I ESA within an Area of Concern (AOC) about the target property. For volatile and semi -volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), such as dry cleaning chemicals and industrial solvents, the AOC is defined as 1/3 mile. For petroleum hydrocarbon chemicals such as gasoline the AOC is defined as 1/10 mile. The AOC can be shortened in the down - and cross -gradient directions if the groundwater flow direction is known. Three LUST cases, eight USTs, two dry cleaners, a number oil ASTs and 55 -gallon drums were found on or in close proximity of the Site. Tier 2 focuses on the contaminated plumes from the contaminated properties identified within the AOC and their proximity (critical distance) to the target property. The critical distance is 100 feet for VOCs and 30 feet for petroleum hydrocarbons. A VEC is likely to exist due to the presence of USTs, oil and waste oil ASTs and 55 -gallon drums present on the Site. Although not considered Recognized Environmental Conditions as defined by the EPA AAI rule and ASTM E 1527-13, EMS also noted the following potential environmental concerns and issues: • A 55 -gallon drum of used flying oil was noted behind the sushi restaurant that is not within any secondary containment and could pose a slipping hazard. • Auto parts, oil, antifreeze, transmission oil and other related tools were haphazardly stored within all the auto maintenance and repair shops. • What appeared to be vehicles that had not been moved for an extended period of time were also behind some of the auto maintenance and repair shops. I 2 Introduction Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. (EMS) is pleased to present this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) for the property located at 375 Bristol Street in the City of Costa Mesa, Orange County, California 92626 (the "Site", see Figures 1 and 2). 2.1 Purpose Sanderson J. Ray Development (SJRD) retained EMS on August 19, 2015 to perform the Phase I ESA in support of redevelopment of the 375 Bristol Street property. The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI, 40 CFR Part 312) as well as the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527-13 titled "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process". The ASTM standard defines Recognized Environmental Condition as follows: "The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De Minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions." The EPA's AAI and ASTM E 1527-13 practices are intended to permit the User, SJRD, to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the Innocent Landowner, Contiguous Property Owner, or Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser limitations on Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) liability (also known as "Landowner Liability Protections"). Additional requirements include, but are not limited to, complying with activity and use limitations (AULs), taking reasonable steps to prevent releases, complying with legally required release reporting obligations, etc. In addition to Recognized Environmental Conditions, this Phase I ESA also reports on Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions, Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions, De Minimis conditions and other potential environmental concerns and issues (also known as Business Environmental Risks) such as Vapor Encroachment Conditions (VECs), asbestos -containing materials (ACM), polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) containing electrical equipment, lead-based paint, radon, etc. 2.1.1 Special Terms and Conditions Our investigation conforms to the EPA's AAI rule and ASTM E 1527-13. This report was prepared by EMS solely for the use and benefit of SJRD, together with its affiliates, participants, successors and assigns. No other parties shall have any right to rely on this document. The use of this report is expressly controlled by the terms and conditions in the contract between SJRD and EMS. 2.1.2 Methodology Mr. Anthony F. Severini and Mr. Ashley Flores of EMS performed the Phase I ESA. Mr. Severini is a State of California registered Professional Geologists with over thirty years of relevant, full-time experience performing Phase I ESAs within several states throughout the United States. Mr. Flores holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental Science and has over five years of relevant, full- time experience performing Phase I ESAs. We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific 7 qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the Site. We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Mr. Severini's and Mr. Flores' detailed qualifications are presented in Appendix A. EMS performed the following scope of work in support of developing this Phase I ESA: • EMS performed a detailed investigation into the historical use of the Site. Our historical investigation entailed the review of reasonably ascertainable documents from standard sources from the early 1900's to the present. • EMS reviewed executive summaries of previous reports documenting environmental conditions at the Site and adjacent properties. • EMS conducted a review of reasonably ascertainable regulatory agency information regarding hazardous material use, disposal, and contaminated property information for the Site and surrounding area. This review included a search for environmental liens as well as activity and use limitations (AULs) on the Site. • EMS contacted the following public agencies for additional information for the Site: the EPA; the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC); the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR); the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA); the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB); and, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD). • EMS was supplied with an ASTM E 1527-13 User Questionnaire completed by Mr. Scott Rimland, President of Cardinal Development Company. • EMS performed an inspection of the Site on September 22, 2015. • EMS was provided with site information by Mr. Scott Rimland, President of Cardinal Development Company and Torrey Chacon, Property Manager with Cardinal Development Company. 2.2 Site Description The Site consists of three commercial buildings with a majority the businesses performing auto maintenance and repair work on a 3.18 acre parcel of land. The parcel number for the Site is 119-200- 33. The Site is located on the southwestern side of Bristol Street to the northwest of the Newport Beach Golf Course, in a primarily commercial area. 2.2.1 Site Location The Site is located on the southwestern side of Bristol Street to the northwest of the Newport Beach Golf Course at the address of 375 Bristol Street in the City of Costa Mesa, Orange County, California 92626 (see Figures 1 and 2). 2.2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics The Site is located in a commercial area and is bordered to the north and east by the Corona Del Mar Freeway, to the south by the Newport Beach Golf Course and to the west by residential structures. 2.2.3 Description of Structures, Roads and other Improvements The Site consists of three commercial buildings with a majority the businesses performing auto maintenance and repair work on a 3.18 acre parcel of land. The Site is adjacent to a golf course and commercial and residential structures. 2.2.4 Information Reported by Property Engineers EMS was provided with site information by Mr. Scott Rimland, President of Cardinal Development Company and Ms. Torrey Chacon, Property Manager with Cardinal Development Company. Mr. Rimland escorted Mr. Flores during the EMS Site inspection and provided information regarding former Site operations. Additional information provided by Mr. Rimland and Ms. Chacon is also presented in Section 2.4. 2.2.5 Current Uses of the Property The Site consists of three commercial buildings and associated parking lot used primarily by businesses performing auto maintenance and repair work. A complete description of current activities is provided in Section 2.4. 2.2.6 Past Uses of the Property Based on information provided to and reviewed by EMS during the performance of this Phase I ESA; the Site was originally a vacant parcel of land and was then used as a lot for a car rental company until it was developed into the complex currently at the Site sometime between 1986 and 1987. 2.2.7 Past and Current Uses of Adjoining Properties Based on information reviewed by EMS during the performance of this Phase I ESA, the Site and adjoining properties were vacant land from the late 1930's to about the mid to late 1940's. As the years progressed the Site and adjoining property to the northwest were developed into commercial businesses, to the southwest the properties were developed into residential homes, to the southeast a golf course was constructed and to the northwest the Corona Del Mar freeway was built. 2.3 Records Review EMS conducted a review of reasonably ascertainable and practically reviewable public information for the Site and surrounding area. The information was supplied to EMS both by an outside contractor specializing in compiling such information and by direct contacts made by EMS. 2.3.1 Standard Environmental Records Sources: Federal, State, Tribal and Local EMS retained Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) to perform a search of reasonably ascertainable information from databases for facilities with environmental records within the Site vicinity. The information sources utilized by EDR included publicly available databases compiled by federal, state, tribal and local governmental agencies and proprietary databases available through EDR. The EDR report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of the EPA's AAI rule and ASTM E 1527-13. The databases searched provide information on facilities with records including, but not limited to, the following potential environmental concerns: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Small and Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generators (RCRA-SQGs and RCRA- LQGs); the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS); registered above -ground storage tanks (ASTs); registered underground storage tanks (USTs); historical USTs (HIST USTs); leaking USTs (LUSTs); non -tank spills of hazardous materials; active and inactive landfills; and facilities engaged in the investigation and cleanup of known releases X of hazardous materials. In general, the EPA's AAI rule and ASTM E 1527-13 require a larger search radius for databases with information of greater environmental concern (such as LUSTS, landfills and hazardous substance release facilities) than databases with information of lesser environmental concern (such as registered ASTs, USTs, RCRA-SQGs and RCRA-LQGs). The EPA's AAI rule and ASTM E 1527-13 require the Phase I ESA to include searches for environmental cleanup liens as well as AULs including institutional and engineering controls, recorded under federal, state, tribal, or local laws. The AAI rule and ASTM E 1527-13 allows that either the prospective property owner or the environmental professional may conduct these searches. EDR's regulatory agency database search included searches for liens and AULs from the following four EPA databases: Federal Superfund Liens (NPL LIENS); CERCLA Lien Information (LIEN2); Engineering Controls Sites (US ENG CONTROLS); and Sites with Institutional Controls (US INST CONTROLS). EDR's regulatory agency database search also included a search of the DTSC's Deed Restriction Listing (DEED) and Lien Holder (LIENS) databases. Specific information regarding the databases searched, corresponding search radii, and search results are presented in EDR's report entitled, EDR Radius MapT`u with GeoChece, included in Appendix B. EMS also retained EDR to perform an environmental lien search for the Site. The search was conducted for the Site's parcel number of 119-200-33 and included a search for environmental liens and other AULs. The results of this lien search are presented in EDR's report entitled, EDR Environmental LienSearchTMReport, included in Appendix C. The EDR Property Tax Map Report is included in Appendix D. The Site was not identified on NPL LIENS, LIEN2, US ENG CONTROLS, US INST CONTROLS, LIENS or DEED databases. EDR's environmental lien search found no environmental liens or AULs for the Site's parcel number of 119-200-33. The EDR report indicates that the current owner of the Site is J. Ray Sanderson/Cardinal Development -Bristol Center, a California general partnership and the title was received from Bristol Partners, a general partnership. The EDR report listed the Site on a number of databases related to the auto repair and maintenance shops located on the Site. The Site was listed on the following databases: HAZNET, CA FID UST, LUST, HIST CORTESE, SWEEPS UST, RGA LUST, RCRA-SQG, RCRA NonGen/NLR and EDR HIST Auto Stat. Based on the nature of the information provided by EDR, EMS does not believe all the listings mentioned above are an environmental concern to the Site. Following are the database listings EMS believes may be a potential concern. The Facility and Manifest Data (HAZNET) database is information extracted from copies of hazardous waste manifests received by DTSC each year. The following businesses on the HAZNET database were listed at the Site: ALL FORDS & CHEVY TR, BENZE & BEAMERS, JIFFY LUBE #861, COMPETITION ST, SAEILO MOTORS CA INC, FOREIGN WORKS INC, FOREIGN WORKS THE, SADDLEBACK SMOG & RE, AUTOCARE EXPRESS, DANS AUTOCARE EXPRE, CALIFORNIA COVENTRY, BRISTOL AUTOPLEX, EURO WEST INC, THE DING KING and CALIFORNIA BRAKE WOR. A few of the descriptions provided in the EDR report describe the waste as containing oil; however, a majority of the listings do not have a description listed for the waste. Based on the waste descriptions listed and the number of listings for automotive maintenance and repair shops, EMS believes the HAZNET listings represent a Recognized Environmental Concern. 10 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION and J RAY SANDERSON/CARD appear on the Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank (RGA LUST), Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) and Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List (HIST CORTESE) databases. The RGA LUST is a database that provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases; the LUST database contains an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents; and, the HIST CORTESE is a database no longer updated by government agencies. All the listings for J. RAY CONSTRUCTION and J RAY SANDERSON/CARD appear to be for one case of a leaking underground storage tank listed on the LUST database. According to the EDR report, the LUST case has a status of "Completed — Case Closed" of June 18, 1991. Based on the status of the LUST case, EMS believes the listings mentioned above represent a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. JIFFY LUBE, JIFFY LUBE #0861 and JIFFY LUBE NO 861 were listed on the SWEEPS UST, RCRA-SQG, FINDS and UST databases. Two of the databases listed have updated and specific information for the JIFFY LUBE listing and they are the RCRA-SQG which lists sites that generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste and the UST database which lists active UST facilities gathered from local regulatory agencies. According to the EDR report the number of USTs listed at Jiffy Lube is six and tank use described as M.V. Fuel. Storage is listed as product and capacity for each tank is listed as 2,000, 1,000, 1,000, 2,000, 220 and 220. According to EDR no violations were found for Jiffy Lube. EMS was unable to review any environmental reports regarding investigations into these USTs; therefore, EMS believes these USTs on the Site represent a Recognized Environmental Condition. The EDR report includes a database with information it classifies as "High Risk Historical Records". This database includes the EDR US Hist Auto Stat which is a listing of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites. 375 Bristol St is listed on the EDR US Hist Auto Stat database and in reviewing the findings appears to list a number of the auto repair and maintenance shops located at the Site from 1999 to 2012. No additional information was available for this database. Numerous additional environmental records were identified for facilities in the surrounding area. Due to the distance and direction from the Site, and the nature of the information present in the EDR report, most of these records do not appear to represent a potential environmental concern to the Site. The following nearby facilities discussed below may represent a potential environmental concern to the Site. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) RCRA-LQG and RCRA-SQG lists sites that generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste. The EDR report identified three RCRA-LQG sites within 0.25 mile of the site. Based on the location and distance of the listings for KYOWA OF AMERICA COR located at 385 Clinton Street and KOBOWAY INC it does not appear they pose an environmental concern to the Site. COUNTRY STYLE CLEANE located at 320 Bristol St was located adjacent and to the northwest of the Site. This listing appears to be for a dry cleaner and is potentially up -gradient of the Site based on a Quarterly Monitoring Report prepared for the Bristol Plaza Chevron at 300 Bristol St; therefore, EMS believes it represents a Recognized Environmental Condition. The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) maintains the EnviroStor database which identifies sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reason to investigate further. The EDR report identified 7 ENVIROSTOR facilities within approximately 1 -mile of the Site. Two facilities were within 0.5 mile and possibly up -gradient of the Site on the EDR report and they are 11 listed as COMMODORE SEMIDONDUC at 2955 Airway Ave and SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. at 2970 Airway Ave. These facilities have a listed status of "Refer: Other Agency" according to the EDR report. Based on the distance and location of these two facilities it does not appear they pose an environmental concern to the Site. The EDR report identified 10 Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) cases within 0.5 mile of the Site. The LUST database contains an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. According to the EDR report all the listed LUST cases attained closure with the exception of THRIFTY OIL #008 located at 704. EMS mapped this LUST case based on information from the RWQCB's Geotracker website and found that it was located approximately 8 miles north of the Site in the City of Santa Ana. Based on its distance from the Site, the LUST case for THRIFTY OIL #008 does not appear to pose an environmental concern to the Site. Two of the LUST cases listed in the EDR report were for facilities located within 0.25 mile and potentially up -gradient of the Site. The two facilities listed were BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRO located at 300 Bristol St and UNOCAL #5909 located at 1476 Bristol St. According to the EDR report the status for these two facilities was listed as "Completed — Case Closed". Additional information regarding the 300 Bristol St listing is provided section 2.3.4. Based on its status and location EMS believes UNOCAL #5909 represents a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. According to the EDR report two Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanups (SLIC) cases were identified within 0.5 mile of the Site. The SLIC program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks and similar discharges. Both cases were more than a 0.25 mile from the site and had a status of "Completed — Case Closed". Based on the status and distance of these cases from the Site it does not appear they pose an environmental concern. State Water Resources Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database contains the Underground Storage Database which lists registered USTs. The UST list provided by EDR lists four UST sites within approximately 0.25 -mile of the Site. Three of the facilities do not appear to pose an environmental concern based on their location and distance to the Site. The remaining facility is listed as TESORO ARCO #42076 located at 300 Bristol St. Additional information regarding the 300 Bristol St listing is provided section 2.3.4. The EDR report also supplied information from databases that list underground storage tanks in the area of the Site. The databases included were Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS UST), Historical UST Registered Database (HIST UST) and The Facility Inventory Database (Ca FID UST). The EDR report listed two facilities with the names of R K B INVESTMENTS and KOBOWAY INC at the address of 380 Clinton St. This address was listed on the CERCLIS-NFRAP database which is a list of archived sites in which assessment has been completed and the EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List. Based on the distance, location and its listing on the CERCLIS-NFRAP database, EMS believes the 380 Clinton St listing represents a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. One location was listed on the DRYCLEANERS database which lists drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. The facility listed had an address of 320 Bristol St and a facility name of REDHILL DRYCLEANERS. What appears to be the same location without a facility name was also listed at the address of 320 Bristol St on the EDR US Hist Cleaners database. This database lists what EDR refers to as "High Risk Historical Records" and is a collection of potential dry cleaner sites. 12 Based on this listing being approximately 0.215 mile and potentially up -gradient from the Site; EMS believes the listings for 320 Bristol St represent a Recognized Environmental Condition. EDR US Hist Auto Stat is a database of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that EDR has put together from searching selected national collections of business directories. This database listed one EDR US Hist Auto Stat site within 0.25 -mile of the site. The site listed did not have a name associated with it but did have the address of 300 Bristol St. The site was also listed on the LUST database and according to the EDR report has a status of "Completed — Case Closed". Additional information regarding this site is presented in section 2.3.4. The EDR report also identifies "orphan" facilities that, due to poor or inadequate address information, could not be accurately mapped. Nine orphan facilities were identified by EDR with a majority of them being different names for the gas station located at 300 Bristol St. EMS did a search of the remaining available addresses in the EDR report and determined that based on their distance and location relative to the Site they did not pose an environmental concern. There was one exception to this and it was the listing for the COSTA MESA FWY 19TH TO BRISTOL which is most likely for the freeway adjacent to the Site. This listing only mentions that the freeway has a NPDES permit listing according to EDR. Based on this limited information it does not appear the listing for the COSTA MESA FWY 19TH TO BRISTOL poses an environmental concern to the Site. The results of EMS' review of Standard Environmental Records Sources revealed evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions and Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions in connection with the Site. 2.3.2 Physical Setting Sources The EDR Radius MapTM Report provides a physical setting source addendum (Geochece). The Site is located at an elevation of approximately 27 -feet above mean sea level (msl). Local topography decreases in elevation to the southwest. The Site is located in a 500 -year Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood zone. The EDR report searched for site-specific hydrogeologic data within a 1.25 -mile radius from the Site. Site-specific hydrogeologic data was available for Western Digital Corporation approximately 1/2 - 1 -mile north of the Site and listed groundwater depth at 35.5 -feet and flow to the south. EDR has also developed a groundwater information system, known as Aquiflow, which maintains groundwater depth and flow direction data from reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory agencies. The Aquiflow system listed eleven locations with groundwater data within a 1 -mile radius of the Site. General direction of groundwater flow was reported to the southeast, south-southeast, south, west, east, south-southwest, west-northwest, west- southwest, north-northeast and not reported for locations listed by Aquiflow. The EDR report also searched for public water systems and water wells known to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the State of California. Three Federal USGS water wells were listed within 1 -mile of the Site. No public water supply systems were identified within one mile of the Site. The State Database Well Information list listed three wells within 1 -mile of the Site. The EDR report did not identify any earthquake fault lines within one mile of the Site. The results of EMS' review of Physical Setting Sources did not reveal any evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions in connection with the Site. 2.3.3 Historical Use Information EMS conducted a review of reasonably ascertainable historical information from standard sources to 13 determine the past land use of the Site and surrounding area including the following: Sanborn fire insurance maps; historical topographic maps; historical aerial photographs; historical city directories; and, historical building permits. The following paragraphs summarize our findings. 2.3.3.1 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map Review EMS retained EDR to perform a search for historical Sanborn® fire insurance maps for the site vicinity. Sanborn maps were not found for the site. EDR's Certified Sanborn® Map Report is included in Appendix E. 2.3.3.2 Historical USGS Topographic Map Review EMS retained EDR to provide historical topographic maps prepared by the USGS for the site vicinity. Historical topographic maps were available for the years 1901, 1902, 1935, 1942, 1951, 1965, 1972 and 1981. The EDR Historical Topographic Map Report is included in Appendix F. The Southern Pacific Railroad Newport, a major road and the Newport Bay are visible near the site in Santa Ana 1901, Southern Ca Sheet 1 and the 1902 topographic map. Roads in a grid based pattern are also located to the north and northwest of the Site. Palisades road and the Delhi Drainage Ditch are first listed adjacent to the Site in the 1935 topographic map. Development has significantly increased to the south-southwest of the Site, with the addition of a number of roads in a grid based pattern and what appear to be residential structures in the 1935 map. A number of new roads appear to have been constructed in the immediate vicinity of the Site showing the increase in development in the region by the time we reach the 1942 topographic map. The Orange County Airport is first listed in the 1951 topographic map to the northeast of the Site. Roads to the southwest of the Site indicating the construction of residential structures adjacent to the Site and renaming of the Delhi Drainage Ditch to the Delhi Drainage Channel are first visible in the 1965 topographic map. There are no significant changes to the Site in the 1972 and 1981 topographic maps with the exception of increased development in the surrounding area. 2.3.3.3 Aerial Photograph Review EMS reviewed historical aerial photographs obtained from EDR for the years, 1938, 1947, 1952, 1963, 1972, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1990, 1994, 2005, 2009, 2010 and 2012. The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package report is included in Appendix G. The Site and surrounding adjacent properties appear to be vacant land in the 1938 aerial photograph, with the exception of the Delhi Drainage Channel to the southwest of the Site. Development in the surrounding area of the Site has increased significantly and the runway for the Orange County Airport is visible in the 1947 and 1952 aerial photographs. The 1963 aerial photograph appears to show a small building and a number of small structures on the Site. According to information from Ray Walkie of SJRD the Site was previously owned by the Irvine Company and was used as a storage facility for various pieces of equipment. The building on the Site in this aerial photograph was likely used by the small crew that manned the facility. A building is also visible on the adjacent property to the northwest and residential structures are also visible in this aerial photograph. The Site in the 1972 aerial photograph appears to be surrounded by rows of trees or shrubs along its perimeter with what appears to possibly be equipment on the Site. Development on the adjacent property to the northwest and southwest along with the surrounding area has increased in this aerial photograph. There are no significant changes to the Site on the 1977 aerial photograph; however, the construction of the Corona Del Mar Freeway appears to have begun to the northwest of the Site. The 1985 aerial photograph appears to show that the Site has been graded for development and the surrounding area has seen an 14 increase in construction of commercial structures. Adjacent and to the northeast of the Site it appears the construction of the Corona Del Mar Freeway has continued and further east it appears the Orange County Airport has expanded. The 1989 aerial photograph is the first time the buildings currently on the Site are visible. Construction of the commercial development and hotel adjacent and to the northwest of the Site has also been completed in the 1989 aerial photograph. There are no significant changes to the Site or surrounding area in the 1990 to 2012 aerial photographs. 2.3.3.4 City Directory Abstract EMS retained EDR to provide a historical city directory search for the Site and nearby properties. The city directories identify individuals and businesses by street address. EDR obtained information from sources including city and telephone directories dating back to 1920. The EDR City Directory Abstract is included in Appendix H. A number of occupants were listed for the address of 375 Bristol Street in the Cole Information Services, Pacific Bell and Haines Company directories searched by EDR. A majority of the listings on the directories were for auto maintenance and repair shops dating back to 1991. Some of the businesses listed were CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS, AUTOCARE EXPRESS, A OK MUFFLER AUTO REPAIR, COVENTRY JIFFY LUBE ORANGE, etc. The properties surrounding the Site were primarily occupied by commercial businesses. The Cole Information Services directory listed TRUSPEED MOTORCARS at the address of 275 Bristol Street in 2008. This listing appears to be for an auto repair shop that was located over 1,000 feet northwest of the Site. Based on the location of this facility it does not appear to pose an environmental concern to the Site. EMS's review of the city directory did not find any other businesses that may have posed an environmental risk to the Site. 2.3.3.5 Building Permit Report EMS retained EDR to provide a building permit report for the Site and adjacent properties. The EDR Building Permit Report provides municipal building permit records from local municipal governments. The EDR Building Permit Report is included in Appendix I. The only building permit listed for the Site in the EDR report was a building permit for the construction of an "accessible path of travel from Bristol St side and relocate two accessible parking". None of the permits listed in the Building Permit Report for surrounding properties appeared to pose an environmental concern to the Site. Permits listed in the EDR report included sign alteration, roofing, block wall construction, suite expansion and tenant improvement. 2.3.4 Previous Environmental Reports EMS reviewed a tenant assessment report prepared for the Site and two recent environmental reports for facilities within 0.25 mile of the Site. The two reports for sites within 0.25 mile of the Site were for the Old Fuel Farm located at John Wayne Airport and Bristol Plaza Chevron located at 300 Bristol St. Both of these reports were used to determine their potential impact to the Site and general groundwater flow in the area. The Tenant Environmental Site Assessment, Bristol Autoplex was prepared by Anne M. Brown of Environmental Management Consulting in May 1997 to evaluate environmental conditions at the Bristol Autoplex property. According to the report the complex at the time was nine years old and was primarily occupied by automotive repair and related service businesses. The report also mentions that the complex was previously occupied by an Avis vehicle maintenance facility. Findings and recommendations from the report are as follows: 15 1. According to Mr. Searcy, the clarifier is cleaned out about once a year. In order to keep the system operating properly, it is recommended that the clarifier be put on a biannual cleanout program. 2. Secondary containment has not been provided beneath the solvent baths in the auto servicing units. Stains were observed on the floor beneath each of these units, and over time, this could create an environmental contamination problem since some solvents can penetrate through unsealed concrete slabs, and/or find pathways to underlying soil via cracks. It is recommended that all tenants with solvent baths provide secondary containment such as a plastic spill pan. These pans are readily available through Safety Supply companies. 3. To ensure that tenants and others are aware that hazardous wastes are not to be disposed of in or around the dumpsters, it is recommended that the property manager post signs stating NO WASTE CHEMICAL OR BATTERY DISPOSAL ALLOWED on each of the dumpster enclosures. 4. Mop water from those tenants not connected to the trench/clarifier system is discharged into sinks or floor drains. Since this water could contain significant quantities of oil and other debris, this practice over time could result in clogged drains. It is recommended that a means of discharging this water into the clarifier system be provided. This way, oily residues and debris can be collected before discharge to the sewer system. 5. Imari Sushi stores their waste grease in a container behind the shop. The asphalt in the immediate area was covered with a grease residue creating both a potential health & safety problem. It is recommended that secondary containment be provided beneath the grease container and grease spills be cleaned up on a routine basis. 6. Ding King is using Unit #45 itself as a paint booth which appears to present a potential contamination problem for the unit as well potential health/safety problems for users and possibly other tenants. It is recommended that Ding King contact the South Coast Air Quality Management District concerning the necessity of installing and operating a controlled paint booth. 7. No evidence of a monitoring well was observed on the property during the site visit. If the owner is aware of a monitoring well on the property, it should be determined if the well is still necessary. If not, it is recommended that the well be removed, preferably by the company that installed the well. The lack of secondary containment beneath solvent baths, the disposal of mop water into sinks and floor drains and the existence of a paint booth represent a Recognized Environmental Condition in relation to the Site. The 2014 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Old Fuel Farm John Wayne Airport was prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler (Amec) on January 30, 2015 for the Old Fuel Farm located near the southeastern corner of the John Wayne Airport (JWA) property. This fuel farm supplied the fuel for airport operations prior to the construction of the new commercial fueling facility in 1990. According to the report the RWQCB in 1988 issued a Clean-up and Abatement Order to JWA and all 30 fuel tanks were subsequently removed. Soil and groundwater were primarily impacted by Jet Fuel and to a lesser extent aviation gasoline. MTBE was also detected in groundwater samples after the installation of a gasoline tank which was replaced. According to the report there are 31 monitoring wells, 12 of which have contained free floating product and have used canisters to skim free product. This method of product removal was implemented for over ten years and discontinued in 2007 due to diminishing 16 returns. JWA at this time requested site closure and was denied by the RWQCB. As part of their monitoring and sampling it appears Amec subcontracts a company to remove free product from wells on the site. According to the report shallow groundwater flow beneath JWA is generally to the west and southwest. During this reporting period 10 of 31 wells contained free product. The conclusions in the report state that "the distribution of free product is generally similar to past monitoring events and suggests generally two separate areas of free product presence". EMS reviewed the Amec Free Product Distribution Map supplied in the report and it appears the free product measured in the monitoring wells does not appear to have moved off-site. Based on the regular removal of free product from on- site wells, EMS believes the JWA facility represents a Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition. The Quarterly Monitoring Report Prepared For the Property Located at Bristol Plaza Chevron prepared by Centec Engineering (Centec) on January 21, 2011 was prepared for the former Chevron station at 300 Bristol St. Site assessment at the property began in 1996 and six groundwater monitoring wells, one vapor extraction well and four air sparging wells were installed at the site. Investigation results for the site indicated that soil and groundwater were impacted by low to moderate levels of petroleum hydrocarbons. Remediation at the site was performed using high vacuum vapor and dual phase extraction, complimented by air sparging. This was accomplished using a mobile unit as opposed to a fixed unit. The groundwater gradient in this report was measured to be to the south- southwest. The results from post -remediation monitoring found no detectable levels of MTBE or benzene remained in groundwater and Centec felt closure of the site was appropriate. On January 8, 2013 the OCHCA submitted a Remedial Action Completion Certification to Bristol Plaza Chevron at 300 Bristol St. Based on the completion certification from the OCHCA and its location relative to the Site, EMS believes Bristol Plaza Chevron represents a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. 2.3.5 Additional Record Sources EMS searched the following regulatory agency websites for any additional information for the Site and addresses adjacent to the Site: EPA's Envirofacts; DTSC's EnviroStor; SWRCB's GeoTracker; and the FIND websites. No additional information was available for the Site on the EnviroStor, Envirofacts and EnviroStor websites. The Site was listed on the Geotracker website as J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL as a LUST clean- up site. The potential contaminant of concern was listed as gasoline with a clean-up status of "Completed — Case Closed as of 6/18/1991". Potential media affected was listed on the website as "other groundwater (uses other than drinking water)" and regulatory activities included a leak discovery on 7/9/1987. The Geotracker database listed two facilities adjacent to the Site as LUST Cleanup Sites. The two facilities were listed as BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON at 300 Bristol St and MARTIN AVIATION (FUEL FARM) which is part of John Wayne Airport. The BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON facility is listed as "Completed — Case Closed" and a "Remedial Action Completion Certification" letter is available on the Geotracker website for this facility (see Appendix J). The MARTIN AVIATION (FUEL FARM) is listed as "Open — Verification Monitoring as of 1/1/2004". These two facilities are discussed in further detail in the previous section 2.3.4. The FIND website listed two inactive permits on the Site for CFC -12 Recovery/Recycling equipment issued in April 1994. The two company names listed were Aladdin Auto Repair and Saddleback 17 Automotive. No other information was available for the Site on the FIND website. A number of permits were listed on the FIND website for properties near the Site. Permits for the two service stations located at 300 and 1512 Bristol St were available for the storage and dispensing of gasoline. An inactive permit for a soil vapor extraction system for gasoline was also listed on the FIND website for the service station at 1512 Bristol St. One inactive and two active permits were also listed for the dry cleaning equipment used at Red Hill Cleaners at 320 Bristol St. One inactive and one active permit were listed for the dry cleaning equipment which appeared to use perchloroethene. The remaining active permit listed equipment which appeared to use a petroleum solvent as opposed to perchloroethene. Additional information for facilities up -gradient of the Site is available in section 2.3.4. No facilities were listed adjacent to the Site on the Envirostor or Envirofacts websites. According to the DOGGR Online Mapping System (DOMS), no historic oil and gas production wells are listed within 1 mile of the Site. 2.3.6 ASTM E 1527-05 User Questionnaire Mr. Scott Rimland, President of Cardinal Development Company, completed an ASTM E 1527-13 User Questionnaire for the Site on September 30, 2015. Mr. Rimland answered in the negative to all questions regarding knowledge of present or past activities, uses, or any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the Site. A copy of the completed ASTM E 1527-13 User Questionnaire is included in Appendix K. 2.4 Information from Site Reconnaissance and Interviews EMS visited the Site on September 22, 2015 and performed a Site inspection. Mr. Flores with EMS was escorted by Mr. Scott Rimland, President of Cardinal Development Company during the inspection of unoccupied suites at the Site. During the inspection of occupied suites Mr. Flores requested access and information from tenants currently occupying the suites. The Site consists of a three building complex totaling approximately 38,000 square feet of commercial space on approximately 3.18 acres of land. The Site is located on the southwestern side of Bristol Street to the northwest of the Newport Beach Golf Course, in a primarily commercial area (see Figure 2). Many of the tenant suites are used as automotive maintenance and repair shops. There is an on-site Property Manager and all tenant spaces are routinely inspected and checked for major environmental issues by the Property Manager. EMS met with Mr. Rimland at the offices of Cardinal Development Company which is located in Suite 50 of the complex. The interior of this suite consisted of a reception area, meeting room, cubicles, kitchen break room area and offices (see Photographs 1 and 2). EMS was informed by Mr. Rimland that cleaning supplies were not stored in this office other than a bottle or two of glass cleaner. Mr. Flores was escorted by Mr. Rimland to Suite 85 at the complex which is located at the western end of the central building on the complex. This suite has been vacant for over a year and according to Mr. Rimland was previously occupied by an auto repair shop. According to Mr. Rimland the drain along the front of the garage in this suite, drains into the three stage clarifier on the western side of the central building on the complex (see Photograph 3). The interior of the building contained walls for a small office and two vehicles were noted parked inside (see Photograph 4). Light staining was also noted near the drain along the front of the garage (see Photograph 5). Upon exiting Suite 85 Mr. Flores was escorted to Suite 110 which is currently being leased to a company that sells Halloween costumes and decorations (see Photograph 6). This suite is a standalone building located on the western side of the Site. According to Mr. Rimland this suite was previously used by Jiffy Lube as an auto maintenance shop approximately four to five years ago. This was followed by another auto maintenance shop which stayed in the location for approximately a year. This building has a basement with a large drain that was used to drain the basement of any water that may have entered into the building. This drain was covered by Halloween decorations and EMS was unable to examine the drain more closely (see Photograph 7). According to Mr. Rimland this drain was not used to dispose of any hazardous material produced by the two auto maintenance shops previously there. EMS was also informed that the two shops used 55 -gallon drums of oil and antifreeze when they were at the location and Mr. Rimland did not know of any tanks that may have been used there. The upper floor consisted of a waiting area and small offices along with the bays used for work on automobiles. EMS did not note any obvious staining on the floor related to previous operations at Suite 110. Following Suite 110 Mr. Flores and Mr. Rimland entered Suite 95 which has been unoccupied for two years. This suite is located in the northwestern building on the property near the western corner of the property. This suite was previously used as a transmission and muffler shop. It is currently being used as storage by the Cardinal Development Company with fitness equipment, furniture, a trailer and a vespa and an automobile currently being stored inside (see Photograph 8). EMS noted an electric lift in the garage area of the suite and was informed that the suite previously had four of them (see Photograph 9). According to Mr. Rimland this suite also had a drain which led to the three -stage clarifier to the east of the suite (see Photograph 10). EMS also noted some paint stored on top of the electrical room in the southwestern corner of the suite. EMS was shown the three -stage clarifier on the northern side of Suite 85 but was unable to access it as vehicles were parked on top of it (see Photograph 11). According to Mr. Rimland the clarifier is pumped once to twice a year by a waste hauling company. Mr. Rimland was unsure what waste hauling company they used as it has changed over the years. To the south of this area along the property line was a small block structure previously used by Jiffy Lube. According to Mr. Rimland this small block room was used by Jiffy Lube for a short time to store 55 -gallon drums. The room had a small concrete trench inside of it which was full of dirt, leaves, trash and two empty five -gallon buckets of pickle chips (see Photograph 12). EMS continued the Site walk without Mr. Rimland and was granted access to Suite 100 by the current tenant. This suite is located in the building on the northwestern portion of the Site. This suite is used for automotive repair by Beach City Motorsport. The suite had a waiting area, office and garage. The garage was full of tools, gallons of oil, oil filters, batteries, antifreeze and auto parts stored haphazardly throughout the garage (see Photograph 13). In the center of the garage EMS noted a small drum with an attachment used to drain oil from oil filters. Next to this was a mop bucket full of oily water which according to the tenant was emptied into 55 -gallon drums for disposal. These 55 -gallon drums were not placed in secondary containment and were located in the northern portion of the suite (see Photograph 14). This suite is not attached to the clarifier and according to the tenant hazardous waste is picked up and disposed of by a hazardous waste hauler. EMS continued the Site walk at Suite 105 which is adjacent and to the north of Suite 100. This suite 19 was occupied by Becker Tire and Service Center, an automotive maintenance and tire shop. This suite also consisted of a waiting area, offices and garage (see Photograph 15). Stored near the southwest corner of the building were two 120 gallon oil aboveground storage tanks (AST) and one 1,250 gallon waste oil AST. Between the two ASTs were two 55 -gallon drums that were not placed on secondary containment, one containing transmission oil and one containing used oil filters (see Photograph 16). Another oil drum and 5 -gallon buckets of oil were also stored in this area without any secondary containment. A number of oil pans and used oil filters were also haphazardly stored on top of the waste oil AST. In the southwestern corner of the building were two 55 -gallon drums on secondary containment, one containing coolant and the other containing used coolant (see Photograph 17). Above the drums were a number of dyes for coloring the coolant. There was also a third empty 55 -gallon drum filled with what appeared to be auto parts. Two large air compressors were also noted in the corner of the building. The remainder of the garage contained a number of tires, auto parts, batteries and hydraulic lifts. Paint was also being stored in the garage area temporarily as some repairs were just completed in the building. According to the manager, the suite is not attached to the clarifier and hazardous waste is removed by a waste hauling company. EMS continued the Site walk at Suite 90 which is currently occupied by Dan's AutoCare Express, an automotive maintenance shop. The layout of this suite was the same as the rest of the automotive repair and maintenance shops with an office, waiting room and garage. The garage had two electric and one hydraulic lift for vehicles. Along the western wall of the suite were two 55 -gallon drums containing antifreeze (see Photograph 18). The southwestern corner of the suite contained two oil ASTs and one waste oil AST along with two waste oil 55 -gallon drums (see Photograph 19). None of these ASTs or drums were within secondary containment. Suite 80 located adjacent and to the east of Suite 90 is currently occupied by Newport Smog, a smog check location for vehicles. Two pistons previously used for a hydraulic lift were covered with a bucket lid in the rear of the garage (see Photograph 20). According to the tenant a hydraulic lift has not been used in the suite for a number of years. Equipment and tools for smog checking vehicles was noted in the suite along with an air compressor and what appeared to be two small compressed gas cylinders used for an acetylene torch. A mop bucket with what appeared to be oily water was also noted in the rear of the garage (see Photograph 21). According to the tenant this oily mop water is disposed of into the drain which leads to the clarifier. The suite adjacent to 80 was Suite 75 whose current tenant is Saddleback Smog and Repair. This suite was also occupied by an automotive maintenance and repair shop. The garage has four hydraulic lifts used for work on the automobiles serviced there. Walking the garage area EMS noted a parts cleaner bin attached to a tank used for disposing of hazardous waste (see Photograph 22). Near the parts washer were a number of bottles of oil and up a small flight of stairs were a number of auto parts stored above the office and waiting room. Moving towards the western side of the garage EMS noted a 55 -gallon drum of antifreeze that was not on secondary containment. In the western portion of the garage were 55 -gallon drums with waste oil, waste antifreeze and oil filters along with three ASTs containing oil, waste oil and antifreeze. None of the drums or ASTs in the garage were on or in secondary containment (see Photograph 23). This suite also has a drain in the rear of the garage which leads to the clarifier on the Site. Tools, vehicle parts and vehicle maintenance chemicals were stored haphazardly throughout the garage of this suite. Euro West Rover, Inc. was located in Suite 70 which is adjacent and to the east of Suite 75. The current tenant for this suite is a Land Rover/Jaguar automotive service and repair shop. Oil for service 20 and maintenance of vehicles is stored in the northwest corner of the building. Two 55 -gallon drums containing oil were in this location along with smaller drums and 5 -gallon buckets containing waste oil. All of the drums and buckets were not within secondary containment. Automobile parts and engines were also stored in this area along with quarts and gallons of oil. Two small ASTs were also noted in this area near the front of the building (see Photograph 25). A mop bucket with oily water was also noted in this suite and is likely disposed of into the drain leading to the clarifier in the back of the suite. Brake cleaner was also noted on a shelf and two electric lifts were also noted in the garage. Suite 65 was occupied by Waves Window Tinting which did not perform automotive maintenance or repairs. An electric lift was noted in the garage of this suite and EMS was informed by the tenant that they do not use any hazardous materials in large quantities. There were no other auto maintenance or repair shops in the remaining suites of the complex. The remaining suites consisted of two martial arts training schools, a crossfit training location, sushi restaurant, water sculpture gallery and a sandwich restaurant. EMS was unable to access some of these suites as the tenants were not currently at the Site during the inspection. A 55 -gallon drum was noted behind the sushi restaurant which appears to store frying oil. This drum was not stored on or in secondary containment. Around the back of the central building in the complex EMS noted four trash enclosures on the Site. Each of these enclosures had signs stating that dumping of oil, oil filters, solvents, batteries and junk that does not fit in the dumpster was not permitted. There were no signs of dumping of any of the prohibited items in the enclosures. A number of vehicles were also noted to be parked behind the suites which are occupied by automotive maintenance and repair shops. Staining on the asphalt behind these suites was also visible (see Photograph 27). Two transformers were also noted on the site behind the central building and according to Mr. Rimland are the property of Southern California Edison. In general, housekeeping practices are good with minor exceptions. EMS did not observe any use of large quantities of solvents or automotive cleaning products; only small amounts of solvents were observed in aerosol cans. In summary, the Site inspection did not reveal the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions except for the following: • Suites with automotive maintenance and repair shops with 55 -gallon drums and/or ASTs lack secondary containment and are a concern for shallow subsurface contamination. • Suites currently and formerly containing automotive maintenance and repair shops are a concern for shallow subsurface contamination due to their work with hazardous materials. • The three -stage clarifier on the Site is a concern for subsurface contamination. • EMS did not observe solvents being used for the cleaning of auto parts; however, the Site has been an auto maintenance and repair complex for a number of years and it is possible solvents have been used in the past to clean parts. • The drains in each suite leading to the clarifier are a concern for shallow subsurface contamination. • Staining inside some of the suites and in the rear of the central building of the complex is a 21 concern for potential subsurface contamination of petroleum products. Suites with hydraulic lifts may have leaked at some time in the past and therefore are a concern for shallow subsurface contamination. The block storage area formerly used by Jiffy Lube is also a concern for shallow subsurface contamination as it was used to store either oil or waste oil. 2.4.1 Hazardous Substances in Connection with Identified Uses EMS did observe oil, waste oil, antifreeze, brake cleaner and other substances used in automotive maintenance and repair in a number of suites. 2.4.2 Other Hazardous Substance Containers and Unidentified Substance Containers There were no hazardous substances (not in connection with identified uses) or unidentified substance containers observed on-site during the Site inspection. 2.4.3 Storage Tanks A number of ASTs and a clarifier were observed on the Site during the inspection performed by EMS. For additional information regarding storage tanks see section 2.4. 2.4.4 Indications of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Two pad -mounted electrical transformers were noted on the Site; however, they are the property of Southern California Edison (SCE) and any PCBs contained within the transformers would be handled by SCE. 2.4.5 Indications of Solid Waste Disposal Four trash enclosures were noted at the Site with signs stating that the disposal of any automotive maintenance or repair waste was prohibited. EMS did not note any staining inside the trash enclosures indicating dumping of automotive waste. 2.4.6 Physical Setting Analysis, if Migrating Substances are an Issue There are three facilities potentially up -gradient of the Site where environmental assessments have been performed. Additional information regarding these investigations is provided in section 2.3.4 and 2.3.5. 2.4.7 Indications of Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) EMS did not note ACM during the Site inspection and according to Torrey Chacon, Property Manager with Cardinal Development the complex was constructed sometime between 1986 and 1987. The use of ACMs was banned in the late 1970s; therefore, EMS believes there is a low likelihood of ACM in building materials. 2.4.8 Radon Accumulation Potential The National Radon Database has been developed by the EPA and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The EPA has established the following three zone classifications for radon: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) 22 Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L The EDR report contains radon information for Orange County (Appendix B). The EPA Radon Zone for Orange County is Zone 3 (indoor average level < 2 pCi/L). The EPA recommended guideline for radon is 4.0 pCi/L. Federal radon information for Orange County also indicates that 100% of first floor living areas reported radon levels below 4 pCi/L. Second floor living areas and basements were not reported (a total of 1 site was tested). The EDR report also contains data from a California State database for radon. This database indicates that of the 14 sites tested for radon within the 92707 Zip Code, none had radon levels greater than 4.0 pCi/L. Based on this information, EMS noted no potential environmental concerns due to radon. 2.4.9 Indications of Lead Based Paint The buildings on the Site were constructed sometime between 1986 and 1987; therefore, lead based paint is not a concern. 23 3 Data Gaps EMS did not interview the previous owner of the Site. The lack of interviews during the completion of this Phase I ESA may be considered significant data gaps; however, the historical use of the Site is well documented and Mr. Scott Rimland who is President with Cardinal Development Company provided EMS with information regarding the previous owners of the Site. EMS was unable to receive a response from the Orange County Health Care Agency and Costa Mesa Building Department regarding any records for this Site. This information is currently pending and will be provided once received and reviewed by EMS. EMS feels the lack of this information does not significantly impact EMS' ability to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions at the Site. 24 4 Findings and Conclusions EMS performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 for 375 Bristol Street in the City of Costa Mesa, Orange County, California 92626. Any exception to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 3 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions, Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions, Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions or De Minimis Conditions in connection with the Site with the following exceptions: • EMS performed an inspection of the Site on September 22, 2015. Many of the tenant suites are used as automotive maintenance and repair shops. There is an on-site Property Manager and all tenant spaces are routinely inspected and checked for major environmental issues by the Property Manager. In general, housekeeping practices are good with minor exceptions. EMS did not observe any use of large quantities of solvents or automotive cleaning products; only small amounts of solvents were observed in aerosol cans. • The Site inspection did not reveal the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions with the exception of the following: Some suites with automotive maintenance and repair shops have 55 - gallon drums that lack secondary containment; The three -stage clarifier on the Site is a concern for subsurface contamination; EMS did not observe solvents being used for the cleaning of auto parts; however, the Site has been an auto maintenance and repair complex for a number of years and it is possible solvents have been used in the past to clean parts; The drains in each suite leading to the clarifier are a concern for shallow subsurface contamination; Staining inside some of the suites and in the rear of the central building of the complex is a concern for potential subsurface contamination of petroleum products; Suites with hydraulic lifts may have leaked at some time in the past and therefore are a concern for shallow subsurface contamination; and, the small concrete block structure formerly used by Jiffy Lube is also a concern for shallow subsurface contamination as it was used to store either oil or waste oil. • Some of the automotive maintenance shops generate waste oil that is considered a regulated waste in California. The Facility and Manifest Data (HAZNET) database is information extracted from copies of hazardous waste manifests received by DTSC each year. The following businesses on the HAZNET database were listed at the Site: ALL FORDS & CHEVY TR, BENZE & BEAMERS, JIFFY LUBE #861, COMPETITION ST, SAEILO MOTORS CA INC, FOREIGN WORKS INC, FOREIGN WORKS THE, SADDLEBACK SMOG & RE, AUTOCARE EXPRESS, DANS AUTOCARE EXPRE, CALIFORNIA COVENTRY, BRISTOL AUTOPLEX, EURO WEST INC, THE DING KING and CALIFORNIA BRAKE WOR. A few of the descriptions provided in the EDR report describe the waste as containing oil; however, a majority of the listings do not have a description listed for the waste. Based on the waste descriptions listed and the number of listings for automotive maintenance and repair shops, EMS believes the HAZNET listings represent a Recognized Environmental Concern. • The Site address was listed as JIFFY LUBE, JIFFY LUBE #0861 and JIFFY LUBE NO 861 on the SWEEPS UST, RCRA-SQG, FINDS and UST databases. Two of the databases listed have updated and specific information for the JIFFY LUBE listing and they are the RCRA-SQG database which lists sites that generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste and the UST database which lists active UST facilities gathered from local regulatory agencies. According to the EDR report the number of USTs listed at Jiffy Lube is six and tank use is described as M.V. Fuel. Storage for JIFFY LUBE is listed as product and capacity for each tank 25 is listed as 2,000, 1,000, 1,000, 2,000, 220 and 220. According to EDR no violations were found for Jiffy Lube. During the site walk EMS was informed that Jiffy Lube did not have USTs and it appears the listed tanks were ASTs stored in the basement of Suite 110. EMS was unable to review any environmental reports regarding investigations into these ASTs; therefore, EMS believes these ASTs on the Site represent a Recognized Environmental Condition. • The Tenant Environmental Site Assessment, Bristol Autoplex was prepared by Anne M. Brown of Environmental Management Consulting in May 1997 to evaluate environmental conditions at the Bristol Autoplex property. Findings and recommendations from the report are as follows: 8. According to Mr. Searcy, the clarifier is cleaned out about once a year. In order to keep the system operating properly, it is recommended that the clarifier be put on a biannual cleanout program. 9. Secondary containment has not been provided beneath the solvent baths in the auto servicing units. Stains were observed on the floor beneath each of these units, and over time, this could create an environmental contamination problem since some solvents can penetrate through unsealed concrete slabs, and/or find pathways to underlying soil via cracks. It is recommended that all tenants with solvent baths provide secondary containment such as a plastic spill pan. These pans are readily available through Safety Supply companies. 10. To ensure that tenants and others are aware that hazardous wastes are not to be disposed of in or around the dumpsters, it is recommended that the property manager post signs stating NO WASTE CHEMICAL OR BATTERY DISPOSAL ALLOWED on each of the dumpster enclosures. 11. Mop water from those tenants not connected to the trench/clarifier system is discharged into sinks or floor drains. Since this water could contain significant quantities of oil and other debris, this practice over time could result in clogged drains. It is recommended that a means of discharging this water into the clarifier system be provided. This way, oily residues and debris can be collected before discharge to the sewer system. 12. Imari Sushi stores their waste grease in a container behind the shop. The asphalt in the immediate area was covered with a grease residue creating both a potential health & safety problem. It is recommended that secondary containment be provided beneath the grease container and grease spills be cleaned up on a routine basis. 13. Ding King is using Unit #45 itself as a paint booth which appears to present a potential contamination problem for the unit as well potential health/safety problems for users and possibly other tenants. It is recommended that Ding King contact the South Coast Air Quality Management District concerning the necessity of installing and operating a controlled paint booth. 14. No evidence of a monitoring well was observed on the property during the site visit. If the owner is aware of a monitoring well on the property, it should be determined if the well is still necessary. If not, it is recommended that the well be removed, preferably by the company that installed the well. EMS was informed by the property manager that there was not a paint booth at Unit #45 and the area mentioned in the report was actually just a corner of the building used for small "touch up" jobs on repaired vehicles. EMS believes the lack of secondary containment beneath solvent baths and the disposal of mop water into sinks and floor drains represent a Recognized Environmental Condition in relation to the Site. 26 • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) RCRA-LQG and RCRA-SQG lists sites that generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste. COUNTRY STYLE CLEANE located at 320 Bristol St is located adjacent and to the northwest of the Site. This listing appears to be for a dry cleaner and is potentially up -gradient of the Site based on a Quarterly Monitoring Report prepared for the Bristol Plaza Chevron at 300 Bristol St; therefore, EMS believes it represents a Recognized Environmental Condition. • One location was listed on the DRYCLEANERS database which lists drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers and is listed at 320 Bristol St with a facility name of REDHILL DRYCLEANERS. What appears to be the same location without a facility name was also listed at the address of 320 Bristol St on the EDR US Hist Cleaners database. This database lists what EDR refers to as "High Risk Historical Records" and is a collection of potential dry cleaner sites. Based on this listing being approximately 0.215 mile and potentially up -gradient from the Site; EMS believes the listing for 320 Bristol St represent a Recognized Environmental Condition. • The Site is listed as J. RAY CONSTRUCTION and J RAY SANDERSON/CARD on the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST), Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List (HIST CORTESE) and The Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank (RGA LUST) databases. The LUST database contains an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents; the HIST CORTESE is a database no longer updated by the government agencies; and, RGA LUST is a database that provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases. All the listings for J. RAY CONSTRUCTION and J RAY SANDERSON/CARD appear to be for one case of a leaking underground storage tank listed on the LUST database. According to the EDR report, the LUST case has a status of "Completed — Case Closed" as of June 18, 1991. Based on the status of the LUST case, EMS believes the listings mentioned above represent a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. • The Quarterly Monitoring Report Prepared For the Property Located at Bristol Plaza Chevron prepared by Centec Engineering (Centec) on January 21, 2011 was prepared for the former Chevron station at 300 Bristol St. Site assessment at the property began in 1996 and six groundwater monitoring wells, one vapor extraction well and four air sparging wells were installed at the site. Investigation results for the site indicated that soil and groundwater were impacted by low to moderate levels of petroleum hydrocarbons. Remediation at the site was performed using high vacuum vapor and dual phase extraction, complimented by air sparging. This was accomplished using a mobile unit as opposed to a fixed unit. The groundwater gradient in this report was measured to be to the south-southwest. The results from post -remediation monitoring found no detectable levels of MTBE or benzene remained in groundwater and Centec felt closure of the site was appropriate. On January 8, 2013 the OCHCA submitted a Remedial Action Completion Certification to Bristol Plaza Chevron at 300 Bristol St. Based on the completion certification from the OCHCA and its location relative to the Site, EMS believes Bristol Plaza Chevron represents a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. • The EDR report identified 10 Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) cases within 0.5 mile of the Site. The LUST database contains an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. One of the LUST cases listed in the EDR report was for a facility located within 0.25 mile and potentially up -gradient of the Site. The facility was listed as UNOCAL #5909 located at 1476 Bristol St. According to the EDR report the status for this facility was listed as 27 "Completed — Case Closed". Based on its status and location, EMS believes UNOCAL #5909 represents a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. • The EDR report also supplied information from databases that list underground storage tanks in the area of the Site. The databases included were Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS UST), Historical UST Registered Database (HIST UST) and The Facility Inventory Database (Ca FID UST). The EDR report listed two facilities with the names of R K B INVESTMENTS and KOBOWAY INC at the address of 380 Clinton St. This address was listed on the CERCLIS-NFRAP database which is a list of archived sites in which assessment has been completed and the EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List. Based on the distance, location and its listing on the CERCLIS-NFRAP database, EMS believes the 380 Clinton St listing represents a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. • The 2014 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Old Fuel Farm John Wayne Airport was prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler (Amec) on January 30, 2015 for the Old Fuel Farm located near the southeastern corner of the John Wayne Airport (JWA) property. This fuel farm supplied the fuel for airport operations prior to the construction of the new commercial fueling facility in 1990. According to the report the RWQCB in 1988 issued a Clean-up and Abatement Order to JWA and all 30 fuel tanks were subsequently removed. Soil and groundwater were primarily impacted by Jet Fuel and to a lesser extent aviation gasoline. MTBE was also detected in groundwater samples after the installation of a gasoline tank which was eventurally replaced. According to the report there are 31 monitoring wells, 12 of which have contained free floating product and have used canisters to skim free product. This method of product removal was implemented for over ten years and discontinued in 2007 due to diminishing returns. JWA at this time requested site closure and was denied by the RWQCB. As part of their monitoring and sampling it appears AMEC subcontracts a company to remove free product from wells on the site. Shallow groundwater flow beneath JWA is generally to the west and southwest. During this reporting period 10 of 31 wells contained free product. The conclusions in the report state that "the distribution of free product is generally similar to past monitoring events and suggests generally two separate areas of free product presence". EMS reviewed the AMEC Free Product Distribution Map supplied in the report and it appears the free product measured in the monitoring wells does not appear to have moved off-site. Based on the regular removal of free product from on-site wells, EMS believes the JWA facility represents a Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition. Although indoor air quality is specifically listed as a non -scope consideration under Section 13.1.5.7 of ASTM E 1527-13, Environmental Professionals cannot eliminate migration of vapors from the ASTM E 1527-13 Phase I ESA scope of work as this would result in the Phase I ESA being non -AAI compliant. ASTM has released ASTM E 2600-10 Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions. The Guidance is directed at identifying the likelihood for migrating vapors to encroach onto a target property creating a VEC. The potential findings of the ASTM E 2600-10 screening are the following: • A VEC exists or is likely to exist; or, • A VEC can be ruled out because it does not exist or is not likely to exist. ASTM E 2600-10 is a two Tier process. Tier 1 focuses on known or suspected contaminated properties identified during the Phase I ESA within an Area of Concern (AOC) about the target property. For volatile and semi -volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), such as dry cleaning chemicals and industrial solvents, the AOC is defined as 1/3 mile. For petroleum hydrocarbon chemicals such as gasoline the AOC is defined as 1/10 mile. The AOC can be shortened in the down - and cross -gradient directions if the groundwater flow direction is known. Three LUST cases, eight USTs, two dry cleaners, a number oil ASTs and 55 -gallon drums were found on or in close proximity of the Site. Tier 2 focuses on the contaminated plumes from the contaminated properties identified within the AOC and their proximity (critical distance) to the target property. The critical distance is 100 feet for VOCs and 30 feet for petroleum hydrocarbons. A VEC is likely to exist due to the presence of USTs, oil and waste oil ASTs and 55 -gallon drums present on the Site. Although not considered Recognized Environmental Conditions as defined by the EPA AAI rule and ASTM E 1527-13, EMS also noted the following potential environmental concerns and issues: • A 55 -gallon drum of used flying oil was noted behind the sushi restaurant that is not within any secondary containment and could pose a slipping hazard. • Auto parts, oil, antifreeze, transmission oil and other related tools were haphazardly stored within all the auto maintenance and repair shops. • What appeared to be vehicles that had not been moved for an extended period of time were also behind some of the auto maintenance and repair shops. 29 5 Bibliography Tenant Environmental Site Assessment, Bristol Autoplex, Anne M. Brown of Environmental Management Consulting, May 1997 2014 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Old Fuel Farm John Wayne Airport, Amec Foster Wheeler (Amec), January 30, 2015 Quarterly Monitoring Report Prepared For the Property Located at Bristol Plaza Chevron, Centec Engineering (Centec), January 21, 2011 30 FIGURES 0 i W c k!q S r hi a arrald'r, .40 r 'Y� 9e a... AMP M ► i- E 4e�en I . z �m IN n Ayres Hold & sui les C¢s to mesa SITEeel %T11 y ViRas mksus IIrn LS� �rewier Gl�ssi� ��r� Jr r 'team CC ql� VA 4d Map Source: Google Maps SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Protect Number EMS547 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project Manager Drafter Figure AS I A' ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Date F--aallyBased Environmental Solutions 1 9/30/2015 PHOTOGRAPHS Client: Sanderson J Ray Development Property Location: Photographs Date: Project Number: EMS547 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, Ca September 22, 2015 Photograph 1: Office located in suite 50. Photograph 2: Kitchen break room area in suite 50. Photograph 3: Drain along the front of garage which leads to a three -stage clarifier. EWIRONMENTAL MANA GENT SIRAIFUES,INC it A L_ ►�ia�t�s��»�����iHi��itr��t�� � firii��r�r�1►�r�fi►� X Client: Sanderson J Ray Development Property Location: Photographs Date: Project Number: EMS547 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, Ca September 22, 2015 Photograph 4: Cars parked inside suite 85. Photograph 5: Staining near drain inside of suite 85. Photograph 6: Suite 110 being used as a Halloween store. EWIRONMWrAL MANAGMENT SIRATEGUNINC Client: Sanderson J Ray Development Property Location: Photographs Date: Project Number: EMS547 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, Ca September 22, 2015 Photograph 7: Large drain in basement of suite 110 covered in Halloween decorations. Photograph 8: Fitness equipment and trailer stored in suite 95. Photograph 9: Electric car lift inside suite 95. EWIRONNIENTAL MANAGMENT SIRAIFUES,INC Client: Sanderson J Ray Development Property Location: Photographs Date: Project Number: EMS547 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, Ca September 22, 2015 Photograph 10: Drain in suite 95 leading to three -stage clarifier. Photograph 11: Three -stage clarifier north of suite 85. Photograph 12: Pit inside small block structure in southwestern portion of Site. EWIRONNIENTAL MANA GENT SIRAIFUES,INC Client: Sanderson J Ray Development Property Location: Photographs Date: Project Number: EMS547 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, Ca September 22, 2015 Photograph 13: Garage area in suite 100. Photograph 14: Waste oil drums not stored in secondary containment in suite 100. Photograph 15: Garage area suite 105. EWIRONMWrAL MANAGMENT SIRAIFUES,INC Client: Sanderson J Ray Development Property Location: Photographs Date: Project Number: EMS547 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, Ca September 22, 2015 Photograph 16: 55 -gallon drums between two oil ASTs in suite 105. Photograph 17: Two 55 -gallon drums on secondary containment, one containing coolant the other containing used coolant in suite 105. Photograph 18: Two 55 -gallon drums containing waste antifreeze in suite 90. EWIRONMENTAL MANA GENT SIRAIFUES,INC Client: Sanderson J Ray Development Property Location: Photographs Date: Project Number: EMS547 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, Ca September 22, 2015 Photograph 19: Two 55 -gallon drums of waste oil between two ASTs in suite 90. Photograph 20: Covered piston previously used in suite 80. Photograph 21: Oily mop water in suite 80. EWIRONNIENTAL MANAGMENT SIRATEGUES INC r Client: Sanderson J Ray Development Property Location: Photographs Date: Project Number: EMS547 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, Ca September 22, 2015 Photograph 22: Parts cleaner in garage of suite 75. Photograph 23: ASTs in garage of suite 75. Photograph 24: 55 -gallon drums in suite 70. E WIRONMENTAL MANAGMENT 91RAIFOESS INC Client: Sanderson J Ray Development Property Location: Photographs Date: Project Number: EMS547 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, Ca September 22, 2015 Photograph 25: Two small ASTs in suite 70. Photograph 26: Trash enclosure sign. Photograph 27: Staining on asphalt behind suites with automotive maintenance and repair tenants. EWIRONMENTAL MANA GENT SIRAIFUES,INC OIL OIL F!LTERSIS0LVENTS BATTERIES/JUNK THAT DOES NOT FIT IN DUMPSTER �� •••:: ': ! THANK YOIJ T , i , IL APPENDIX A QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Anthony E Severini, P. G. Position in the Firm Page 1 of 7 Mr. Severini is the President and Owner of Environmental Management Strategies, Inc., headquartered in Irvine, California. Mr. Severini specializes in the fields of damage assessment and cost recovery of environmental remediation, PRP cost assessment and allocation, environmental contractor dispute resolution, the transfer sale and/or divestiture of environmentally impaired property, regulatory dispute resolution, environmental insurance claims and protection, and strategic environmental planning. Mr. Severini is a licensed Geologist in eight states including California. His 30 years of experience is based upon environmental work performed on over 2000 sites spanning 44 states in the US. Mr. Severini, who is considered one of the top hydrogeologists in Southern California, brings an understanding of complex environmental issues along with business acumen of key financial impacts of environmental damage to assist law firms, industry, insurance companies, lenders and property owners in environmental litigation and cost allocation of environmental pollution. Professional Experience Mr. Severini provides expert witness testimony for environmental litigation on sites involving soil and ground -water contamination, environmental stigma, cost allocation, NCP applicability and financial damage assessment. He has both testified and provided expert opinions on numerous court cases involving CERCLA claims, toxic torts, and PRP cost allocation. Additionally, he has provided testimony under direct and cross examination and has provided thousands of pages of deposition testimony. Because of his strong environmental background, numerous cases have been settled immediately after Mr. Severini's delivery of an expert report. Mr. Severini has directed or overseen environmental investigations on sites involving manufacturing, aerospace, chemical storage, manufactured gas plant, automotive assembly, petroleum storage, petroleum refining, landfill / disposal, multiple PRP groundwater plumes, site demolition, and facility decommissioning. Mr. Severini's areas of environmental technical skills include hydrogeology, geology, geochemistry, property conveyance, ground -water monitoring systems, site assessments, site remediation, environmental audits, vacuum extraction, ground -water remediation, biodegradation, and regulatory negotiation. Mr. Severini is one of the nation's leading consultants on environmental investigations related to due diligence and property transfer, purchasing, and financing, having managed and directed investigations on more than 2000 properties totaling more than $35 billion in real estate value. Mr. Severini's experience includes assessing aquifer properties, quantifying ground -water flow, determining the extent of ground -water contamination, and ground -water and contaminant ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Financially Based,Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel 949.679.9500 Fax 949.679.9501 www.goemsm %com INC. Page 2 of 7 modeling in saturated and unsaturated soils. Mr. Severini has experience in interpreting hydrogeologic and geochemical data; estimating hydrogeologic properties of aquifers; and determining ground -water flow paths and travel time. He has worked on ground -water models including data synthesis, developing and calibrating two- and three-dimensional finite -element and finite -difference flow models, sensitivity analysis of input parameters, predictive modeling of contaminant transport, and performance modeling of proposed containment systems. He is also a professional in "forensic -type" analyses for determining unknown sources for contaminant plumes and has received corporate quality awards for excellence in hydrology. Summary of Related Project Experience The following is a brief description of a sampling of Mr. Severini's experience on environmentally impaired sites. • Mr. Severini was the former National Environmental Practice Leader for KPMG's Forensic and Litigation Services Practice. In this capacity, Mr. Severini directed a team of insurance, real estate and engineering professionals in the development of exit strategies for clients with environmentally impaired properties. These exit strategies included the procurement of environmental insurance products, the cleanup of potentially hazardous chemical constituents in the soil and ground water, and the assessment of real estate value based on impaired and unimpaired conditions. • Consulted on the procurement of remediation cost cap insurance and third party liability insurance products for a $150 M commercial development in Irvine, California. The site was impaired by two off-site sources of ground -water contamination and the owner wanted to sell an equity interest to an institutional investor. Our staff developed all the necessary environmental due diligence information, coordinated the transfer of data between the insurance broker and insurance carrier, and reviewed sample policies and draft policies during the procurement phase. • Directed the analysis of potential exit strategies for a $22 M commercial development in Milpitas, California. The site was impaired by on-site and off-site sources of ground- water contamination. Three exit strategies were selected which included a combination of on-site remediation and insurance products in lieu of indemnifications. The property is currently in remediation stages and will be placed on the market for sale once insurance products are procured. • Directed the remediation of 240 acres of a former oil production area in Huntington Beach, California. Over 100,000 cubic yards of soil contaminated with petroleum products, arsenic, metals and reduced sulfur compounds were remediated for development of the site for residential housing. Directed the recycling, treatment and disposal of contaminated soil from leaking oil field production wells, methane and odor measurements and abatement, oil storage tanks, oil field sumps, refining facilities and buried pipelines. Assisted with regulatory compliance and permitting. Assisted in the ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Financially Based,Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel 949.679.9500 Fax 949.679.9501 www.goemsinc.com Page 3 of 7 development plans for the reuse of the former oil production facility as a future residential housing development, area parks and a golf course. • Directed site characterization studies on four separate refineries in the greater Los Angeles area. Bulk storage terminals, aboveground and underground storage tanks, pumping/transfer stations, marine terminals, and spill areas were investigated with soil borings and monitoring wells. Soil and ground -water contamination, and free -phased floating product were identified. • Directed a RCRA corrective action remediation of a metal foundry in Paramount, California. The site was identified as a potential school site for the Paramount school district. Tasks included characterization of the vertical and lateral extent of contamination, removal of underground storage tanks, disposal of soil contaminated with metals and solvents, remediation of 4,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil by enhanced biodegradation, free -phase product recovery, ground -water monitoring and remediation. • For a former oil recycling facility in Santa Fe Springs, California, managed the ground- water and soil characterization studies, negotiated a formal process for removing the site from the Superfund list with regulatory agencies, designed soil and ground -water cleanup measures, managed the removal of aboveground and underground storage tanks, and prepared documents in support of construction financing. • One of Mr. Severini's specialties is the computer simulation of ground -water aquifers and contaminant plume migration, having completed nearly 30 separate investigations in his career. • Using optimization modeling, determined the optimal pumping scheme for water supply wells in the Cheyenne, Wyoming municipal water well fields. Analyzed existing aquifer conditions, simulated seasonal performances of the well fields with computer models, and developed pumping strategies that minimized well field drawdown and produced abundant water supply for the city of Cheyenne during normal and below normal precipitation periods. • Evaluated the effectiveness of recharge strategies for the West Coast Basin ground -water aquifer for the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Evaluated the effectiveness of recharge basins, evapotranspiration losses, salt -water intrusion barriers, ground -water injection and recharge requirements to meet peak ground -water demand periods during drought years. • Designed the ground -water extraction system for a mining facility in Denver, Colorado to control ground -water contaminant migration from a mine tailings pond using state-of-the- art computer simulation techniques. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Financially Based,Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel 949.679.9500 Fax 949.679.9501 www.goemsinc.com INC. Page 4 of 7 • Managed the cost accounting for economic damages caused by regional ground -water contamination for a major aerospace corporation in southern California. Performed and directed the financial analyses of financial statements, databases, invoices, contracts and purchase orders for the development, installation, and operation of a water treatment purification plant. Assisted in the development of financial summary documents to support the submittal of claim packages to insurance carriers. • Managed ground -water projects for the Department of Energy's program to determine safe geologic media for the deep burial of high-level radioactive waste in the mid- Atlantic and Gulf Coast states. Calculated ground -water flow velocities in deep formations, simulated the performance of the deep repositories with finite -difference and finite -element models in three dimensions, and performed stochastic probability analyses to determine the effects of data error on repository performance. Analyzed the ability to characterize hydrologic properties in deep, fractured crystalline rocks and salt domes through small and large diameter boreholes. • Directed the investigations of sites contaminated with MTBE in Santa Monica, Irvine and Los Angeles, California. Each site involved the characterization of ground -water plumes, the extent of MTBE plume migration, and the overlap of other plumes with MTBE. Forensic types of analyses were performed using numerical modeling simulations to evaluate the locations of possible sources and the time -rate -of -travel of MTBE. Results indicated the possible times when spillage of MTBE occurred at each of the sources, the volume of ground water contaminated by each source and provided a basis for cost allocation between PRPs for total remediation costs. • Developed the design for a vapor extraction remediation system for Caltrans in support of freeway expansion in Livingston, California. System was designed to remove free petroleum products from the water table and shallow soils. Project awarded and designed while Mr. Severini was with a former employer. The system designed by Mr. Severini was placed into operation and site closure was achieved. • Provided senior oversight of hydrogeologic investigations on manufactured gas plant sites in New York and California. Investigations included review of historic operations, locations of potential source areas of contamination, and identification of MGP constituents in soil and ground water. • Directed the sampling of soils to determine the deposition of air -borne contaminants at residences in the City of Glen Avon in support of the PRP defense committee at the Stringfellow Superfund site in southern California. Provided testimony as to the techniques for sampling, constituents discovered and their likely source. • Directed the remediation of a large TCE/PCE ground -water plume at a former aerospace facility in Irvine, California. Tasks included delineating the extent of the plume, installing a pump and treat extraction well system, removal of an underground storage ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Financially Based,Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel 949.679.9500 Fax 949.679.9501 www.goemsm %com INC. Page 5 of 7 tank, NPDES permitting, treatment of contaminated effluent by ultraviolet/peroxide purification and carbon adsorption, and treatment of 2,000 yards of contaminated soil by chemical oxidation. Developed a cost allocation model for the settlement of CERCLA claims between existing and previous landowners. • Managed the cleanup of a gasoline leak from an underground storage tank in Fullerton, California. Permitted, designed, and operated a vapor extraction system using carbon adsorption to achieve eventual cleanup of the contaminated soil. • Evaluated the effectiveness of ground -water extraction systems at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal in Denver, Colorado. Simulated the recovery of contaminated ground water using a two-dimensional finite -difference computer model and predicted the shape and concentration of the plume over the next 25 years of use. The simulations were used to upgrade the existing extraction system to increase the effectiveness of all control measures. Former Positions Prior to forming Environmental Management Strategies, Inc., Mr. Severini was the National Environmental Practice Leader for KPMG LLP where he was the lead consultant on all environmental litigation engagements. Prior to joining KPMG, Mr. Severini managed the California operations of Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc., an environmental engineering, design and remediation firm, where he was Vice President and General Manager of BBL's Irvine, California office. Prior to joining BBL, Mr. Severini managed the California operations of TRC Companies, an environmental engineering firm, where he was Vice President and Manager of Hazardous Waste Services for TRC's offices in Irvine, Fresno and San Francisco. Publications Severini, A. and Gibson, J. - Evaluation of In Situ Hydrogeologic Techniques for Determining Crystalline Rock Permeability in Large- and Small -Diameter Boreholes. Abstract of the Hydrogeology of Rocks of Low Permeability, International Association of Hydrogeologists, Tucson, Arizona, January 1985. Severini, A. and Gibson, J. - Evaluation of Technology for Large- and Small -Diameter Boreholes to Characterize Crystalline Rock. BMI/OCRD-21, Office of Crystalline Repository Development, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, May 1985. Severini, A., Royalty, P.D., and Bateman, R.L. - Optimization of Cheyenne Municipal Well -Field Operations: An Application of Parameter Estimation Modeling. Proceedings of ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Financially Based,Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel 949.679.9500 Fax 949.679.9501 www.goemsm %com INC. Page 6 of 7 Practical Applications of Ground -water Models Conference, National Water Well Association, Worthington, Ohio, August 15-17,1984. Severini, A. and Bitner, M.J. - Two Algorithms to Improve the Efficiency of Existing Well Fields: I. Theoretical Development; IT Applications. Abstract of the American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting, San Francisco, December 1984. Severini, A. and Gibson, J. - Preliminary Overburden Characterization at Richton Dome. ONWI-481, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, November 1983. Severini, A., McElwee, C., Butt, M., and Fleming, A. - Salinity Control on the Smokey Hill River in Central Kansas. Proceedings of the 1983 International Symposium on State -of -the - Art Control of Salinity, Salt Lake City, July 13-15, 1983. Regional Ground -Water Flow Near Richton Dome, Mississippi. ONWI-456, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, November 1983. Severini, A. and Huntley, D. - Heat Convection in Warm Springs Valley, Virginia. Ground Water, 21, No. 6, November 1983. Severini, A., Denne, J., Stander, T., Sophocleous, M., and Lucus, J. - An Integrated Approach for Locating Glacial Buried Valley Aquifers. Ground Water Series 5, Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas, 1982. Severini, A., McElwee, C., Cobb, P., Fleming, A., and Paschetto, J. - Study of the Salt Water Intrusion Problem Between Salina, Kansas and Solomon, Kansas, in the Smokey Hill River Valley. Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas, March 1981. Severini, A. - Computer Modeling of Relief Wells Proposed to Alleviate Salt Water Intrusion Between Salina and Solomon, Kansas. Abstract of the Annual Meeting, National Water Well Association, Kansas City, September 1981. Severini, A., Denne, J., and Cobb, P. - Results Comparison Between Conventional and Signal Enhanced DC Resistivity Instruments in Ground -Water Resource and Contaminant Exploration. Abstracts of the American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting, San Francisco, December 1981. Severini, A. - Resistivity Methods Applicable to the Detection of the Freshwater - Saltwater Interface in Ground -Water Aquifers. Kansas Water Resources Board, Kansas River Basin, Salt River Intrusion Briefing, February 1980. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES Financially Based,Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel 949.679.9500 Fax 949.679.9501 www.goemsm %com INC. Page 7 of 7 Severini, A. - Optimization of the Drilling of Water Quality Observation Wells Using Electrical Resistivity. Annual Meeting of the Big Bend Ground -water Management District No. 5, March 1980. Severini, A., Denne, J., Sophocleous, M., and Lucus, J. - Integrated Approach for Locating Glacial Buried Valley Aquifers in Northeastern Kansas. New Techniques in Assessing Ground -Water Conditions in Glaciated Terrains Symposium, Midwest Ground -Water Conference, October 1980. Mr. Severini is an author or co-author on over 1,500 technical reports documenting his consulting services to client. Registrations Professional Geologist, Arizona Professional Geologist, Arkansas Professional Geologist, California Professional Geologist, Idaho Professional Geologist, Indiana Professional Geologist, Oregon Professional Geologist, Tennessee Professional Geologist, Virginia AHERA Certified Asbestos Building Inspector AHERA Certified Asbestos Management Planner AHERA Certified Asbestos Project Designer AHERA Certified Asbestos Contractor Supervisor General Engineering A Licensed Contractor, California C-57 Certified Well Driller, California Education MS/Geology, 1980, University of Connecticut BS/Geology, 1975, University of Connecticut ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Financially Based,Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel 949.679.9500 Fax 949.679.9501 www.goemsinc.com ASHLEY FLORES POSITION IN THE FIRM Mr. Flores has a Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental Science from the University of California Riverside and has been in the environmental consulting industry since 2005. Mr. Flores has joined our team at EMS as a Staff Scientist in 2008. While at EMS Mr. Flores has participated in Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) identification environmental cost allocation, forensic environmental analysis, environmental due diligence, and environmental litigation support. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE As a Staff Scientist with EMS, Mr. Flores has conducted Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I ESAs) and Phase II subsurface investigations. Mr. Flores has also conducted site remediation activities including remedial excavation confirmation sampling and routine soil vapor extraction system operation and maintenance. Mr. Flores site investigation and remediation experience has included work performed at vacant, residential, commercial, and industrial properties. Contaminants of concern included petroleum hydrocarbons, industrial solvents and emergent chemicals. Mr. Flores has experience with traditional hollow -stem auger, direct push and sonic drilling techniques for soil boring and groundwater monitoring well installation. Mr. Flores has also directed soil gas surveys. Mr. Flores has written reports, in whole or in part, documenting Phase I, Phase II and remediation activities. As a Staff Scientist with EMS, Mr. Flores has conducted sampling of suspected asbestos containing material in commercial and residential structures. Mr. Flores participates in an on- going mold -abatement project for a food distribution warehouse located in Rancho Cucamonga, California. As an Operations Manager, Mr. Flores managed, organized, and scheduled excavation and housing renovation projects in New Orleans, Louisiana for a crew of 20 employees. As an Environmental Technician/Scientist Mr. Flores has prepared storm water pollution prevention plans for companies who are required to sample their storm water discharge. Mr. Flores has also prepared toxic chemical release inventory reports and countermeasure plans for spill prevention of hazardous materials or chemicals, also has experience in biohazard cleanup of vehicles and has also taught training sessions for first aid, CPR, and blood borne pathogen exposure. REPRESENTATIVE SITE EXPERIENCE • Conducted Due Diligence site assessment activities for numerous residential, commercial and industrial properties located in California. The Due Diligence site assessment activities consisted of the completion of Phase I and Phase II ESAs as well as conducting ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Financially Based, Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92692 Tel: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 h :// Ii nc.com Mr. Ashley Flores Page 2 of 3 and evaluating the results of asbestos, lead based paint, lead in drinking water and radon gas surveys. • Participates in on-going litigation support projects including PRP identification, detailed evaluation of historic activities, detailed hydrogeological and contaminant distribution evaluations, and cost allocation projects located in Orange and Los Angeles Counties, California. • Coordinated meetings for mold abatement activities conducted at a 165,000 square foot distribution warehouse in Rancho Cucamonga, California. Meetings were held during the week on a daily basis to ensure the abatement contractor personnel did not interfere with normal warehouse operations. Communication between the warehouse personnel and the abatement contractor personnel allowed the abatement activities to be completed in a timely manner and ahead of schedule. Programmed and oversaw the installation of temperature and humidity data loggers to monitor building conditions. • Conducted asbestos sampling for the remodeling of office suites at an office complex in the city of Pasadena. Due to the age of the buildings asbestos containing material was suspected to be contained within the building materials of the buildings. Asbestos samples were taken from a number of different medium including drywall, joint compound, carpet glue, etc. in each of the office suites ready for remodeling. The suites sampled did not contain asbestos allowing the suites to be remodeled without any additional expenses for asbestos removal and disposal. • Performed remedial excavation confirmation soil sampling for a former copier refurbishing facility located in Irvine, California. Activities included screening soil for segregation according to South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1166, soil confirmation sampling and determination of final excavation limits. • Conducted groundwater monitoring on a quarterly basis at a former oil field services bulk plant in northern California. The location previously contained a maintenance shop including underground storage tanks, steam cleaning, sumps, clarifiers, and associated drain lines. Currently conducting quarterly groundwater monitoring at an active plating facility and former aerospace manufacturing facility, both located in southern California. Groundwater underlying the plating facility is impacted with hexavalent chromium, while the aerospace facility is impacted with chlorinated solvents. FORMER POSITIONS 2008 — Present Scientist, Environmental Management Strategies, Inc., Irvine, California. 2005 —2008 Operation Manager, BPD Inc., Fontana, California 2003 —2005 Environmental Technician/Scientist, Jorgenson Environmental, Rancho Cucamonga, California. 2003 Part-time Environmental Technician, Regulation Compliance Inc., Riverside, California. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Financially Based, Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92692 Tel: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 http://www. goe'rnsinc. com Mr. Ashley Flores Page 3 of 3 EDVCATION Mr. Flores is a graduate from the University of California Riverside, he has received a Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental Science. SPECIAL SKILLS/AWARDS Fluent in Spanish Proficient in PC programs such as Excel and Microsoft Word. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Financially Based, Environmental Solutions 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92692 Tel: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 http://www. goe'insinc. com APPENDIX B EDR RADIUS MAPTM WITH GEOCHECK® Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Inquiry Number: 4397232.2s August 28, 2015 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor www.edrnet.comt.com Shelton, CT 06484 (rEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc Toll Free: FORM-LBB-KKT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 OverviewMap----------------------------------------------------------- 2 DetailMap-------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Map Findings Summary 4 MapFindings------------------------------------------------------------ 8 Orphan Summary--------------------------------------------------------- 116 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GRA GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map ------------------------------------------- A-6 Physical Setting Source Map------------------------------------------------ A-12 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-14 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC4397232.2s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 375 BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 33.6643000 - 33° 39'51.48" 117.8795000 - 117° 52' 46.20" Zone 11 418458.9 3725088.8 27 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: Version Date: Northeast Map: Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 5640950 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 2012 5640942 TUSTIN, CA 2012 Portions of Photo from: 20120505 Source: USDA TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Target Property Address: 375 BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92707 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP ID SITE NAME Al A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 All Al2 A13 A14 A15 A16 A17 A18 A19 A20 A21 A22 A23 A24 A25 A26 B27 B28 B29 C30 C31 C32 C33 34 D35 D36 D37 D38 D39 ALL FORDS & CHEVY TR BENZ & BEAMERS JIFFY LUBE JIFFY LUBE #861 COMPETITION ST SAEILO MOTORS CA INC J. RAY CONSTRUCTION FOREIGN WORKS INC JIFFY LUBE J RAY SANDERSON/CARD JIFFY LUBE #0861 JIFFY LUBE NO 861 FOREIGN WORKS THE J. RAY CONSTRUCTION SADDLEBACK SMOG & RE AUTOCARE EXPRESS J. RAY CONSTRUCTION AUTOPLEX TRANSMISSIO J RAY SANDERSON/CARD DAN'S AUTOCARE EXPIRE CALIFORNIA COVENTRY BRISTOL AUTOPLEX EURO WEST INC THE DING KING CALIFORNIA BRAKE WOR REDHILL DRYCLEANERS COUNTRY STYLE CLEANE KYOWA OF AMERICA COR KOBOWAY INC R K B INVESTMENTS R K B INVESTMENTS GUNTHERS PRINTING SOUTH COAST SHELL SOUTH COAST SHELL TESORO ARCO #42076 BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRO MAPPED SITES SUMMARY ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS 375 BRISTOL ST STE 6 375 S BRISTOL UNIT 8 375 S BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL ST 375 BRISTOL ST STE 9 375 BRISTOL ST STE 8 375 BRISTOL 375 S BRISTOL #90 375 S BRISTOL 110 375 BRISTOL 375 S BRISTOL STE 11 375 BRISTOL ST 375 S BRISTOL #90 375 BRISTOL ST 375 BRISTOL ST STE 7 375 S. BRISTOL STREE 375 BRISTOL STREET 375 BRISTOL STE 95 375 BRISTOL ST S 375 S BRISTOL ST STE 375 BRISTOL #30 375 BRISTOL ST 375 BRISTOL STREET 375 S BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL ST STE 3 375 BRISTOL ST STE 1 320 BRISTOL ST 320 BRISTOL ST STE C 320 BRISTOL ST 385 CLINTON ST 380 CLINTON ST 380 CLINTON ST 380 CLINTON ST 3188 BLDG F AIRWAY A 1512 SE BRISTOL ST 1512 SE BRISTOL ST 300 BRISTOL ST 300 BRISTOL ST 300 BRISTOL HAZNET HAZNET CA FID UST HAZNET HAZNET HAZNET LUST, HIST CORTESE HAZNET SWEEPS UST RGA LUST RCRA-SQG, FINDS RCRA-SQG, UST HAZNET RGA LUST HAZNET HAZNET RGA LUST RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS RGA LUST HAZNET HAZNET EDR US Hist Auto Stat HAZNET HAZNET HAZNET HAZNET EDR US Hist Cleaners DRYCLEANERS RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET RCRA-SQG CERC-NFRAP, RCRA-SQG, HIST UST, FINDS CA FID UST UST, SWEEPS UST RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, HAZNET UST UST UST EDR US Hist Auto Stat LUST, HAZNET RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ELEVATION DIRECTION 4397232.2s Page 2 TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP Higher 946, 0.179, NW Higher 946, 0.179, NW Higher 946, 0.179, NW Higher 1026, 0.194, NNE Higher 1046, 0.198, NNE Higher 1046, 0.198, NNE Higher 1046, 0.198, NNE Higher 1058, 0.200, North Higher 1099, 0.208, NW Higher 1099, 0.208, NW Higher 1136, 0.215, NW Higher 1136, 0.215, NW Higher 1136, 0.215, NW 4397232.2s Page 2 MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 375 BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92707 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP ID SITE NAME ADDRESS E40 UNOCAL #5909 1476 BRISTOL E41 UNOCAL SERVICE STATI 1476 SOUTH EAST BRIS 42 DOLLAR RENTAL CAR 2152 BRISTOL F43 THRIFTY OIL #008 704 F44 AL & J'S CLEANERS 270 BRISTOL STREET, G45 ALAMO RENT A CAR 3510 IRVINE G46 ALAMO RENT A CAR 3500 IRVINE 47 BRISTOL VILLAGE CLEA 260 BRISTOL ST H48 SUPERFORMANCE 2950 AIRWAY H49 SUPERFORMANCE 2950 AIRWAY AVE H50 SUPERFORMANCE 2950 AIRWAY AVENUE A 151 SANTA ANA COUNTRY CL 20241 SANTA ANA 152 SANTA ANA COUNTRY CL 20241 53 NEWPORT BEACH GOLF C 3100 IRVINE 54 COMMODORE SEMICONDUC 2955 AIRWAY AVE 55 SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. 2970 AIRWAY AVENUE J56 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 2122 J57 CHEVRON #20-2016 2121 58 SIERRACIN TRANSMASK 3952 N CAMPUS DR J59 CHEVRON #20-2016 2121 BRISTOL 60 ORANGE COUNTY AIRPOR Higher 61 (CMAFP) SANTA ANA Al Higher 62 COSTA MESA AIR NATIO S OF PRESIDIO DR & W 63 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT F 19801 AIRPORT WAY SO 64 EXOTIC MATERIAL INC 2930 BRISTOL ST DATABASE ACRONYMS RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ELEVATION DIRECTION LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1264, 0.239, NW Notify 65 Higher 1264, 0.239, NW LUST, SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1377, 0.261, SE LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1434, 0.272, NW ENVIROSTOR Higher 1558, 0.295, NW HIST CORTESE Higher 1561, 0.296, SE LUST, CA FID UST Higher 1571, 0.298, SE RCRA-SQG, SLIC, Orange Co. Industrial Site, FINDS Higher 1602, 0.303, NW LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1642, 0.311, NNE LUST, UST Higher 1642, 0.311, NNE SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1642, 0.311, NNE LUST, UST, SWEEPS UST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1643, 0.311, West CA FID UST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1643, 0.311, West LUST, CA FID UST Lower 1736, 0.329, SSW ENVIROSTOR, HIST UST, EMI Higher 1916, 0.363, NNE CERC-NFRAP, RCRA-SQG, ENVIROSTOR, SLIC, Orange Co ... Higher 2067, 0.391, NNE HIST CORTESE Higher 2172, 0.411, SE SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, HIST CORTESE Higher 2178, 0.412, SE CERC-NFRAP, RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS Higher 2276, 0.431, East LUST, CHMIRS Higher 2302, 0.436, SE ENVIROSTOR Higher 3538, 0.670, NE ENVIROSTOR Higher 4001, 0.758, WNW RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR, HIST Cal -Sites, Cortese Higher 4241, 0.803, NW EMI, Notify 65 Higher 4903, 0.929, ENE ENVIROSTOR Higher 5193, 0.984, NNW 4397232.2s Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: Site Database(s) EPA ID ALL FORDS & CHEVY TR HAZNET N/A 375 BRISTOL ST STE 6 GEPAID: CAL000339507 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 BENZ & BEAMERS HAZNET N/A 375 S BRISTOL UNIT 8 GEPAID: CAL000088218 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 JIFFY LUBE CA FID UST N/A 375 S BRISTOL Facility Id: 30001588 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Status: I JIFFY LUBE #861 HAZNET N/A 375 BRISTOL ST GEPAID: CAR000020594 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COMPETITION ST HAZNET N/A 375 BRISTOL ST STE 9 GEPAID: CAL000351417 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 SAEILO MOTORS CA INC HAZNET N/A 375 BRISTOL ST STE 8 GEPAID: CAL000275471 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION LUST N/A 375 BRISTOL Status: Completed - Case Closed COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Facility Id: 87UT151 Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605900488 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605900488 HIST CORTESE Reg Id: 083000608T FOREIGN WORKS INC HAZNET N/A 375 S BRISTOL #90 GEPAID: CAL000033993 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 JIFFY LUBE SWEEPS UST N/A 375 S BRISTOL 110 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Comp Number: 11174 J RAY SANDERSON/CARD RGA LUST N/A 375 BRISTOL COSTA MESA, CA JIFFY LUBE #0861 RCRA-SQG CAD983582727 375 S BRISTOL STE 11 EPA ID:: CAD983582727 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 FINDS Registry ID:: 110008280948 JIFFY LUBE NO 861 RCRA-SQG CAR000020594 375 BRISTOL ST EPA ID:: CAR000020594 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 UST Facility Id: 11174 FOREIGN WORKS THE HAZNET N/A 375 S BRISTOL #90 GEPAID: CAL000021256 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION RGA LUST N/A 375 BRISTOL ST COSTA MESA, CA SADDLEBACK SMOG & RE HAZNET N/A 375 BRISTOL ST STE 7 GEPAID: CAL000168335 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 AUTOCARE EXPRESS HAZNET N/A 375 S. BRISTOL STREE GEPAID: CAL000125301 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION RGA LUST N/A 375 BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA, CA AUTOPLEX TRANSMISSIO RCRA NonGen / NLR CAD982368979 375 BRISTOL STE 95 EPA ID:: CAD982368979 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 FINDS Registry ID:: 110002801781 J RAY SANDERSON/CARD RGA LUST N/A 375 BRISTOL ST S COSTA MESA, CA TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DAN'S AUTOCARE EXPIRE HAZNET N/A 375 S BRISTOL ST STE GEPAID: CAL000298743 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 CALIFORNIA COVENTRY HAZNET N/A 375 BRISTOL #30 GEPAID: CAL000142853 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 375 BRISTOL ST EDR US Hist Auto Stat N/A 375 BRISTOL ST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 BRISTOL AUTOPLEX HAZNET N/A 375 BRISTOL STREET GEPAID: CAL000112045 COSTA MESSA, CA 92626 EURO WEST INC HAZNET N/A 375 S BRISTOL GEPAID: CAL000217157 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 THE DING KING HAZNET N/A 375 BRISTOL ST STE 3 GEPAID: CAC002689519 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 CALIFORNIA BRAKE WOR HAZNET N/A 375 BRISTOL ST STE 1 GEPAID: CAL000120379 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proposed NPL---------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCL/S list FEDERAL FACILITY---------. Federal Facility Site Information listing CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF----------------- RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS------------------------ Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST------------------- Underground Storage Tank Listing AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP-------------------------- Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties INDIAN VCP ------------------ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS---------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT--------------- Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS____________________ Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 ----------- Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL__________________________ Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Local Land Records LIENS________________________ Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS_______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS_________________________ Military Cleanup Sites Listing Orange Co. Industrial Site____. List of Industrial Site Cleanups SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS________________________ Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR--------------- Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA________________________ Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD_________________________ Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP__________________________ Potentially Responsible Parties TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PADS________________________ PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA-------------- Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS___________________ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV_____________ Indian Reservations UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS--------------------- Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese ------------------------- Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF__________________________ Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT_________________________ Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES----------------------- NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database UIC--------------------------- UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP__________________________ Well Investigation Program Case List EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP: Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. A review of the CERC-NFRAP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/25/2013 has revealed that there are 3 CERC-NFRAP sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page KOBO WA Y INC 380 CLINTON ST NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) C31 41 SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. 2970 AIRWAY AVENUE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.391 mi.) 55 82 SIERRACIN TRANSMASK 3952 N CAMPUS DR E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.431 mi.) 58 92 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/10/2015 has revealed that there are 3 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page COUNTRY STYLE CLEANE 320 BRISTOL ST NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) B29 37 KYOWA OF AMERICA COR 385 CLINTON ST NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.194 mi.) C30 40 KOBO WA Y INC 380 CLINTON ST NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) C31 41 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. A review of the RESPONSE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/04/2015 has revealed that there is 1 RESPONSE site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page COSTA MESA AIR NATIO S OF PRESIDIO DR & W NW 1/2 - 1 (0.803 mi.) 62 105 AWP Facility Id: 30970004 Status: Active TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Facility Id: 30970004 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program's (SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly -contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/04/2015 has revealed that there are 7 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page AL & J'S CLEANERS 270 BRISTOL STREET, NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.295 mi.) F44 61 Facility Id: 30720003 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency COMMODORE SEMICONDUC 2955 AIRWAY AVE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.363 mi.) 54 80 Facility Id: 71002508 Status: Refer: Other Agency SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. 2970 AIRWAY AVENUE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.391 mi.) 55 82 Facility Id: 30280370 Status: Refer: Other Agency ORANGE COUNTY AIRPOR NE 1/2 - 1 (0.670 mi.) 60 103 Facility Id: 80000829 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation (CMAFP) SANTA ANA Al WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.758 mi.) 61 104 Facility Id: 80000028 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation COSTA MESA AIR NATIO S OF PRESIDIO DR & W NW 1/2 - 1 (0.803 mi.) 62 105 Facility Id: 30970004 Status: Active EXOTIC MATERIAL INC 2930 BRISTOL ST NNW 1/2 - 1 (0.984 mi.) 64 114 Facility Id: 30280530 Status: Refer: Other Agency State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/15/2015 has revealed that there are 10 TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRO 300 BRISTOL NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.215 mi.) D39 48 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 97UT025 Facility Status: Remediation Plan Global Id: T0605902077 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605902077 UNOCAL #5909 1476 BRISTOL NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.239 mi.) E40 54 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 90UT109 Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605901145 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605901145 DOLLAR RENTAL CAR 2152 BRISTOL SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.261 mi.) 42 56 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 98UT109 Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605902234 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605902234 THRIFTY OIL #008 704 NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.272 mi.) F43 60 Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway Global ID: T0605900604 ALAMO RENT A CAR 3500 IRVINE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.) G46 62 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 94UT070 Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605901821 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605901821 SUPERFORMANCE 2950 AIRWAY NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.311 mi.) H48 67 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 93UT044 Global Id: T0605901795 Current Status: 9 SUPERFORMANCE 2950 AIRWAY AVE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.311 mi.) H49 68 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901795 SANTA ANA COUNTRY CL 20241 SANTA ANA W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.311 mi.) 151 70 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 87UT224 Facility Id: 98UT032 Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605902156 Global Id: T0605900564 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605900564 CHEVRON #20-2016 2121 BRISTOL SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.436 mi.) J59 94 TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 99UT034 Facility Id: 92UT065 Facility Status: Case Closed Facility Status: Remediation Plan Global Id: T0605901528 Global Id: T0605902282 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605901528 Global ID: T0605902282 Lower Elevation NEWPORT BEACH GOLF C Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 86UT158 Facility Status: Remediation Plan Global Id: T0605900231 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605900231 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page 3100 IRVINE SSW 114 - 112 (0.329 mi.) 53 77 SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. A review of the SLIC list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/15/2015 has revealed that there are 2 SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation BRISTOL VILLAGE CLEA Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SLT8R0613945 SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SLT8R1824103 AAA ... 260 BRISTOL ST 2970 AIRWAY AVENUE State and tribal registered storage tank lists Direction / Distance Map ID Page NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.303 mi.) 47 65 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.391 mi.) 55 82 UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/15/2015 has revealed that there are 4 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Eaual/Hiaher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page R K B INVESTMENTS Facility Id: 1185 SOUTH COAST SHELL Facility Id: 2357 SOUTH COAST SHELL 380 CLINTON ST NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) C33 44 1512 SE BRISTOL ST NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.208 mi.) D35 46 1512 SE BRISTOL ST NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.208 mi.) D36 47 TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Facility Id: FA0047260 TESORO ARCO #42076 300 BRISTOL ST NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.215 mi.) D37 47 Facility Id: FA0063272 Facility Id: 18456 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites HIST Cal -Sites: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. A review of the HIST Cal -Sites list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/08/2005 has revealed that there is 1 HIST Cal -Sites site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page COSTA MESA AIR NATIO Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks S OF PRESID/O DR & IN NIN 1/2 - 1 (0.803 mi.) 62 105 SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990's. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there is 1 SWEEPS UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Eaual/Hiaher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID R K B INVESTMENTS Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 1185 380 CLINTON ST NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) C33 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there is 1 HIST UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address KOBOWAY INC 380 CLINTON ST Facility Id: 00000016659 Page 44 Direction / Distance Map ID Page NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) C31 41 TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there is 1 CA FID UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation R K B INVESTMENTS Facility Id: 30008693 Status: A Other Ascertainable Records Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page 380 CLINTON ST NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.198 mi.) C32 44 RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/10/2015 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page GUNTHERS PRINTING 3188 BLDG F AIRWAY A N 118 - 114 (0.200 mi.) 34 45 DRYCLEANERS: A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaners' agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/18/2015 has revealed that there is 1 DRYCLEANERS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page REDHILL DRYCLEANERS 320 BRISTOL ST STE C NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) B28 37 EPA Id: CAL000303898 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 10 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page UNOCAL #5909 1476 BRISTOL NW 118 - 114 (0.239 mi.) E40 54 Reg Id: 083001502T DOLLAR RENTAL CAR 2152 BRISTOL SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.261 mi.) 42 56 TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Reg Id: 083003337T THRIFTY OIL #008 704 NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.272 mi.) F43 60 Reg Id: 083000764T ALAMO RENT A CAR 3510 IRVINE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.296 mi.) G45 62 Reg Id: 083002612T SUPERFORMANCE 2950 AIRWAY NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.311 mi.) H48 67 Reg Id: 083002555T SUPERFORMANCE 2950 AIRWAY AVENUE A NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.311 mi.) H50 69 Reg Id: 083000095T Reg Id: 083003124T SANTA ANA COUNTRY CL 20241 SANTA ANA W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.311 mi.) 151 70 Reg Id: 083000714T SANTA ANA COUNTRY CL 20241 W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.311 mi.) 152 76 Reg Id: 083003171T EXXON SERVICE STATIO 2122 SE 1/4 -1/2 (0.411 mi.) J56 90 Reg Id: 083002060T CHEVRON #20-2016 2121 SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.412 mi.) J57 90 Reg Id: 083003460T Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/21/1993 has revealed that there are 2 Notify 65 sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page UNOCAL SERVICE STATI 1476 SOUTH EAST BRIS NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.239 mi.) E41 56 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT F 19801 AIRPORT WAY SO ENE 112 - 1 (0.929 mi.) 63 114 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR US Hist Auto Stat list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR US Hist Auto Stat site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 Equal/Higher Elevation Not reported EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Address 300 BRISTOL ST Direction / Distance Map ID Page NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.215 mi.) D38 47 EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR US Hist Cleaners list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR US Hist Cleaners site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Not reported Address 320 BRISTOL ST Direction / Distance Map ID Page NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) B27 36 TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 9 records. Site Name BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA FWY 19TH TO BRISTOL SANTA ANA VALLEY IRRIGATION DUMP # BRISTOL PETROLEUM NORTH BRISTOL CLEANERS BRISTOL PLAZA CALIF CLEANERS Database(s) RGA LUST RGA LUST RGA LUST NPDES NPDES SWF/LF HAZNET HAZNET SLIC TC4397232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 OVERVIEW MAP - 4397232.2S 0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles 0 Indian Reservations BIA Areas of Concern ° Power transmission lines d h% 100 -year flood zone 0 500 -year flood zone National Wetland Inventory kV This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex Target Property A Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Costa Mesa CA 92626 Sites at elevations lower than INQUIRY #: 4397232.2s the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites Copyright m 2015 EDR, Inc. (c) 2010 Tele Atlas Rel. 07/2009. Dept. Defense Sites 0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles 0 Indian Reservations BIA Areas of Concern ° Power transmission lines d h% 100 -year flood zone 0 500 -year flood zone National Wetland Inventory kV This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4397232.2s LAT/LONG: 33.6643/117.8795 DATE: August 28, 2015 7:34 pm Copyright m 2015 EDR, Inc. (c) 2010 Tele Atlas Rel. 07/2009. DETAIL MAP - 4397232.2S SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4397232.2s LAT/LONG: 33.6643/117.8795 DATE: August 28, 2015 7:35 pm Copyright m 2015 EDR, Inc. (c) 2010 Tele Atlas Rel. 07/2009. Target Property o 1n6 1/a 114 Miles Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA Areas of Concern Sites at elevations lower than F7/� 100 -year flood zone the target property 500 -year flood zone A Manufactured Gas Plants National Wetland Inventory r Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4397232.2s LAT/LONG: 33.6643/117.8795 DATE: August 28, 2015 7:35 pm Copyright m 2015 EDR, Inc. (c) 2010 Tele Atlas Rel. 07/2009. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP 0.500 0 1 2 NR NR 3 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-SQG 0.250 2 0 3 NR NR NR 5 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal ERNS list ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR 1.000 0 0 3 4 NR 7 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 1 0 2 8 NR NR 11 TC4397232.2s Page 4 Database MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SLIC 0.500 0 0 2 NR NR 2 State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 UST 0.250 1 0 4 NR NR NR 5 AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 HAULERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HIST Cal -Sites 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 SCH 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 US CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST 0.250 1 0 1 NR NR NR 2 HIST UST 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 CA FID UST 0.250 1 0 1 NR NR NR 2 Local Land Records LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 LIENS 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 DEED 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TC4397232.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY TC4397232.2s Page 6 Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted CHMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 LDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MCS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Orange Co. Industrial Site TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SPILLS 90 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 1 0 1 NR NR NR 2 FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US FIN ASSUR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 EPA WATCH LIST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RMP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PRP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MILTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 PCB TRANSFORMER TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LEAD SMELTERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FINDS TP 2 NR NR NR NR NR 2 CA BOND EXP. PLAN 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Cortese 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CUPA Listings 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 EMI TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ENF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Financial Assurance TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HAZNET TP 15 NR NR NR NR NR 15 HIST CORTESE 0.500 1 0 1 9 NR NR 11 HWP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 HWT 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 MINES TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MWMP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TC4397232.2s Page 6 Database MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted NPDES TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PEST LIC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PROC 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Notify 65 1.000 0 1 0 1 NR 2 UIC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 WASTEWATER PITS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 WDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 WIP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 =11]:4 :1 M: I :7 61.16:161 IN] :] [9_1 a 0 =XQ 0 IR EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0.250 1 0 1 NR NR NR 2 EDR US Hist Cleaners 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RGA LUST TP 4 NR NR NR NR NR 4 - Totals -- 30 0 19 24 7 0 80 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC4397232.2s Page 7 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Al ALL FORDS & CHEVY TRUCKS DBA FORDS ONLY Target 375 BRISTOL ST STE 60 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 1 of 26 in cluster A Actual: HAZNET: 27 ft. envid: S113155033 Year: 2012 GEPAID: CAL000339507 Contact: JACK EVANS - OWNER Telephone: 7145491900 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3027 ENTERPRISE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926263031 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000001925 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange envid: S113155033 Year: 2012 GEPAID: CAL000339507 Contact: JACK EVANS - OWNER Telephone: 7145491900 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3027 ENTERPRISE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926263031 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000082925 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange envid: S113155033 Year: 2011 GEPAID: CAL000339507 Contact: JACK EVANS - OWNER Telephone: 7145491900 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3027 ENTERPRISE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926263031 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange envid: S113155033 Year: 2010 HAZNET S113155033 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 8 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site ALL FORDS & CHEVY TRUCKS DBA FORDS ONLY (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number GEPAID: CAL000339507 Contact: JACK EVANS - OWNER Telephone: 7145491900 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3027 ENTERPRISE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926263031 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange A2 BENZ & BEAMERS Target 375 S BRISTOL UNIT 85 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Actual: 27 ft. Site 2 of 26 in cluster A HAZNET: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: S113054880 1999 CAL000088218 SHAH NARESH 0000000000 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 85 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported CAT080013352 Not reported Unspecified aqueous solution Recycler .2293 Orange S113054880 1998 CAL000088218 SHAH NARESH 0000000000 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 85 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported CAT080013352 Not reported Unspecified aqueous solution Recycler .2293 Orange S113054880 1997 CAL000088218 SHAH NARESH S113155033 HAZNET S113054880 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 9 Map ID 27 ft. Facility ID: MAP FINDINGS Regulated By: Direction Regulated ID: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Distance Facility Phone: EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 23436 MADERO STE 200 ATTN: Mailing Address 2: Not reported BENZ & BEAMERS (Continued) S113054880 Contact: Telephone: 0000000000 Not reported Mailing Name: Not reported NPDES Number: Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 85 Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Status: Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .4586 Facility County: Orange A3 JIFFY LUBE CA FID UST S101589142 Target 375 S BRISTOL N/A Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 3 of 26 in cluster A Actual: CA FID UST: 27 ft. Facility ID: 30001588 Regulated By: UTNKI Regulated ID: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 7144729114 Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 23436 MADERO STE 200 ATTN: Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA 92626 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Inactive A4 JIFFY LUBE #861 HAZNET S113173935 Target 375 BRISTOL ST N/A Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 4 of 26 in cluster A Actual: HAZNET: 27 ft. envid: S113173935 Year: 2008 GEPAID: CAR000020594 Contact: GILBERT MARTINEZ Telephone: 8186799453 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 11308 DAVENPORT ST Mailing City,St,Zip: OMAHA, NE 681540000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution TC4397232.2s Page 10 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number JIFFY LUBE #861 (Continued) S113173935 Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.84 Facility County: Orange envid: S113173935 Year: 2008 GEPAID: CAR000020594 Contact: GILBERT MARTINEZ Telephone: 8186799453 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 11308 DAVENPORT ST Mailing City,St,Zip: OMAHA, NE 681540000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.84 Facility County: Orange envid: S113173935 Year: 2006 GEPAID: CAR000020594 Contact: GILBERT MARTINEZ Telephone: 8186799453 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 11308 DAVENPORT ST Mailing City,St,Zip: OMAHA, NE 681540000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Discharge To Sewer/Potw Or Npdes(With Prior Storage --With Or Without Treatment) Tons: 8.34 Facility County: Orange envid: S113173935 Year: 2006 GEPAID: CAR000020594 Contact: GILBERT MARTINEZ Telephone: 8186799453 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 11308 DAVENPORT ST Mailing City,St,Zip: OMAHA, NE 681540000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Discharge To Sewer/Potw Or Npdes(With Prior Storage --With Or Without Treatment) Tons: 8.34 Facility County: Orange envid: S113173935 TC4397232.2s Page 11 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site JIFFY LUBE #861 (Continued) Year: 1998 GEPAID: CAR000020594 Contact: A FANTICOLA COMPANIES INC Telephone: 9095920665 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 978 AMELIA AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: SAN DIMAS, CA 917730000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .1668 Facility County: Orange C;lirk this h gnarlink while viewing on your computer to access 7 additional CA—HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. A5 COMPETITION ST Target 375 BRISTOL ST STE 95 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 5 of 26 in cluster A Actual: HAZNET: 27 ft. envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S113467940 2010 CAL000351417 MICHAEL LOUIE 7142102525 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 95 COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Not reported CAT080013352 Not reported Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect 0.231 Orange A6 SAEILO MOTORS CA INC Target 375 BRISTOL ST STE 85 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 6 of 26 in cluster A Actual: HAZNET: 27 ft. envid: S113128718 Year: 2011 GEPAID: CAL000275471 Contact: YOSHIO KAWASAKI Telephone: 5624316376 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 85 S113173935 HAZNET S113467940 N/A HAZNET S113128718 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SAEILO MOTORS CA INC (Continued) Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, 375 BRISTOL ST STE 85 Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange envid: S113128718 Year: 2011 GEPAID: CAL000275471 Contact: YOSHIO KAWASAKI Telephone: 5624316376 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 85 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange envid: S113128718 Year: 2009 GEPAID: CAL000275471 Contact: YOSHIO KAWASAKI Telephone: 5624316376 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST UNIT 85 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080025711 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010 -H129) Or (H131 -H135) Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange envid: S113128718 Year: 2009 GEPAID: CAL000275471 Contact: YOSHIO KAWASAKI Telephone: 5624316376 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST UNIT 85 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080025711 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery S113128718 TC4397232.2s Page 13 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SAEILO MOTORS CA INC (Continued) J. RAY CONSTRUCTION (H010 -H129) Or (H131 -H135) Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange envid: S113128718 Year: 2007 GEPAID: CAL000275471 Contact: YOSHIO KAWASAKI Telephone: 5624316376 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST UNIT 85 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD099452708 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, LOC Case Number: Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.46 Facility County: Orange C;lirk this h gnarlink while viewing on your computer to access 3 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. A7 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION Target 375 BRISTOL Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 7 of 26 in cluster A Actual: LUST: 27 ft. Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: S113128718 LUST S103954150 HIST CORTESE N/A STATE T0605900488 33.6656471 -117.880869 Not reported Completed - Case Closed 06/18/1991 Not reported DB Not reported 083000608T Not reported Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Contact: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: T0605900488 Local Agency Caseworker DENAMARIE BAKER ORANGE COUNTY LOP 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 SANTA ANA dbaker@ochca.com TC4397232.2s Page 14 Map ID T0605900488 Action Type: MAP FINDINGS Date: Direction Action: Leak Reported Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 06/18/1991 Distance Other Ground Water EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: J. RAY CONSTRUCTION (Continued) S103954150 Not reported Phone Number: 7144336255 Funding: Global Id: T0605900488 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: PATRICIA HANNON Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: phannon@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported Status History: Global Id: T0605900488 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 06/18/1991 Global Id: T0605900488 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 07/09/1987 Regulatory Activities Global Id: T0605900488 Action Type: Other Date: 07/09/1987 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605900488 Action Type: Other Date: 07/09/1987 Action: Leak Discovery ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 87UT151 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 06/18/1991 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0002268 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083000608T Local Case Num: 87UT151 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 15 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number J. RAY CONSTRUCTION (Continued) S103954150 How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605900488 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 7/9/1987 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 6/18/1991 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6656471 Longitude: -117.880869 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: Staff: PAH Staff Initials: AR Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported HIST CORTESE: Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083000608T TC4397232.2s Page 16 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site A8 FOREIGN WORKS INC Target 375 S BRISTOL #90 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Actual: 27 ft. Site 8 of 26 in cluster A HAZNET: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: A9 JIFFY LUBE Target 375 S BRISTOL 110 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Actual: 27 ft. Site 9 of 26 in cluster A S113034806 1995 CAL000033993 THE FOREIGN WORK INC 0000000000 Not reported 375 S BRISTOL #90 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported CAD093459485 Not reported Unspecified solvent mixture Not reported .0333 Orange SWEEPS UST: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: Not reported 11174 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 30-000-011174-000002 Not reported 2000 Not reported M.V. FUEL PRODUCT OTHER 6 Not reported 11174 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 30-000-011174-000003 Not reported 1000 Not reported M.V. FUEL EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HAZNET S113034806 N/A SWEEPS UST S106927785 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 17 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site JIFFY LUBE (Continued) STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: MAP FINDINGS PRODUCT OTHER Not reported Not reported 11174 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 30-000-011174-000004 Not reported 1000 Not reported M.V. FUEL PRODUCT OTHER Not reported Not reported 11174 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 30-000-011174-000005 Not reported 2000 Not reported M.V. FUEL PRODUCT OTHER Not reported Not reported 11174 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 30-000-011174-000006 Not reported 220 Not reported M.V. FUEL PRODUCT OTHER Not reported Not reported 11174 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S106927785 TC4397232.2s Page 18 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site JIFFY LUBE (Continued) Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: MAP FINDINGS Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 30-000-011174-000007 Not reported 220 Not reported M.V. FUEL PRODUCT OTHER Not reported A10 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL Target 375 BRISTOL Property COSTA MESA, CA Site 10 of 26 in cluster A Actual: RGA LUST: 27 ft. 2012 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL 2011 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL 2010 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL 2009 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL 2008 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL 2007 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL 2006 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL 2005 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL A11 JIFFY LUBE #0861 Target 375 S BRISTOL STE 110 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 375 BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S106927785 RGA LUST S114636155 N/A RCRA-SQG 1000594442 FINDS CAD983582727 Site 11 of 26 in cluster A Actual: RCRA-SQG: 27 ft. Date form received by agency: 05/28/1991 Facility name: JIFFY LUBE Facility address: 375 S BRISTOL STE 110 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EPA ID: CAD983582727 Mailing address: 23436 MADERO STE SECOND HUNDRE MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 Contact: LARRY DOMNITZ Contact address: 375 S BRISTOL STE 110 COSTA MESA, CA 92696 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 472-9114 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous TC4397232.2s Page 19 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number JIFFY LUBE #0861 (Continued) 1000594442 waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: CARDINAL DEV CO Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status FINDS: Registry ID No violations found 110008280948 Environmental Interest/Information System California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA TC4397232.2s Page 20 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number JIFFY LUBE #0861 (Continued) program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. UORS (California - Used Oil Recycling System). California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) helps communities establish and promote convenient collection opportunities for used oil and used oil filters. Al2 JIFFY LUBE NO 861 Target 375 BRISTOL ST Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 1000594442 RCRA-SQG 1001195479 UST CAR000020594 Site 12 of 26 in cluster A ALLIED LUBE INC Actual: RCRA-SQG: PO BOX 5709 27 ft. Date form received by agency: 06/18/1997 Facility name: JIFFY LUBE NO 861 Facility address: 375 BRISTOL ST (909) 613-1772 COSTA MESA, CA 926267903 EPA ID: CAR000020594 Mailing address: PO BOX 5709 Not reported DIAMOND BAR, CA 917659998 Contact: SUZAN PAEK Contact address: PO BOX 5709 DIAMOND BAR, CA 917659998 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (909) 613-1772 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: ALLIED LUBE INC Owner/operator address: PO BOX 5709 Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (909) 613-1772 Legal status: Other Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No TC4397232.2s Page 21 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site JIFFY LUBE NO 861 (Continued) Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: UST: Facility ID: Permitting Agency: Latitude: Longitude: No violations found 11174 ORANGE COUNTY 33.665538 -117.8782101 A13 FOREIGN WORKS THE Target 375 S BRISTOL #90 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 13 of 26 in cluster A Actual: HAZNET: 27 ft. envid: S113029152 Year: 2001 GEPAID: CAL000021256 Contact: INACTIVATED BY JAMES LAU PER Telephone: 7149796630 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 51 AUTO CENTER DR Mailing City,St,Zip: IRVINE, CA 927180000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD044429835 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified organic liquid mixture Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 0.41 Facility County: Orange A14 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION Target 375 BRISTOL ST Property COSTA MESA, CA Site 14 of 26 in cluster A Actual: RGA LUST: 27 ft. 2002 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION 375 BRISTOL ST 2001 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION 375 BRISTOL ST EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1001195479 HAZNET S113029152 N/A RGA LUST S114636267 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 22 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number A15 SADDLEBACK SMOG & REPAIR HAZNET S113088355 Target 375 BRISTOL ST STE 75 N/A Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 15 of 26 in cluster A Actual: HAZNET: 27 ft. envid: S113088355 Year: 2013 GEPAID: CAL000168335 Contact: ANDREW PRESTON Telephone: 7146623838 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 75 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.2562 Facility County: Not reported envid: S113088355 Year: 2012 GEPAID: CAL000168335 Contact: ANDREW PRESTON Telephone: 7146623838 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 75 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAD981696420 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129)Or(H131-H135) Tons: 0.2436 Facility County: Orange envid: S113088355 Year: 2012 GEPAID: CAL000168335 Contact: ANDREW PRESTON Telephone: 7146623838 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 75 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAD981696420 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010 -H129) Or (H131 -H135) Tons: 0.2436 Facility County: Orange envid: S113088355 TC4397232.2s Page 23 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SADDLEBACK SMOG & REPAIR (Continued) Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: 2002 CAL000168335 ANDREW PRESTON 7146623838 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 75 COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Not reported NVR000001925 Not reported Unspecified aqueous solution Recycler 0.22 Orange S113088355 2002 CAL000168335 ANDREW PRESTON 7146623838 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 75 COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Not reported NVR000001925 Not reported Unspecified aqueous solution Recycler 0.22 Orange Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 4 additional CA—HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. A16 AUTOCARE EXPRESS Target 375 S. BRISTOL STREET Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Actual: 27 ft. Site 16 of 26 in cluster A HAZNET: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: envid S113070798 2005 CAL000125301 SHERRI KROGH 7149796630 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 90 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported NVR000037432 Not reported Unspecified aqueous solution Recycler 0.27 Orange S113070798 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S113088355 HAZNET S113070798 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 24 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number AUTOCARE EXPRESS (Continued) S113070798 Year: 2005 GEPAID: CAL000125301 Contact: SHERRI KROGH Telephone: 7149796630 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 90 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000037432 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: 0.22 Facility County: Orange envid: S113070798 Year: 2005 GEPAID: CAL000125301 Contact: SHERRI KROGH Telephone: 7149796630 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 90 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000037432 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: Not reported Facility County: Orange envid: S113070798 Year: 2004 GEPAID: CAL000125301 Contact: SHERRI KROGH Telephone: 7149796630 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 90 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000037432 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 0.06 Facility County: Orange envid: S113070798 Year: 2004 GEPAID: CAL000125301 Contact: SHERRI KROGH Telephone: 7149796630 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 90 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000037432 TC4397232.2s Page 25 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site AUTOCARE EXPRESS (Continued) TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: 0.32 Facility County: Orange C;lir:k this h gnarlink while viewing on your computer to access 13 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. A17 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION Target 375 BRISTOL STREET Property COSTA MESA, CA Site 17 of 26 in cluster A Actual: RGA LUST: 27 ft. 1998 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION 1997 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION 1996 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION 1995 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION 1994 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION 1993 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION 1992 J. RAY CONSTRUCTION A18 AUTOPLEX TRANSMISSION Target 375 BRISTOL STE 95 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 375 BRISTOL STREET 375 BRISTOL STREET 375 BRISTOL STREET 375 BRISTOL STREET 375 BRISTOL STREET 375 BRISTOL STREET 375 BRISTOL STREET EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S113070798 RGA LUST S114636268 N/A RCRA NonGen / NLR 1000219077 FINDS CAD982368979 Site 18 of 26 in cluster A Actual: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 27 ft. Date form received by agency: 04/09/1996 Facility name: AUTOPLEX TRANSMISSION Facility address: 375 BRISTOL STE 95 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EPA ID: CAD982368979 Mailing address: BRISTOL STE 95 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact: WILLIAM NYBERG Contact address: 375 BRISTOL STE 95 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 540-6384 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: CARDINAL DEVELOPMENT 375 BRISTOL STE 50 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Not reported (714)557-1934 Private Owner TC4397232.2s Page 26 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site AUTOPLEX TRANSMISSION (Continued) Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415) 555-1212 Private Operator Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status FINDS: Registry ID No violations found 110002801781 Environmental Interest/Information System EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. A19 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL Target 375 BRISTOL ST S Property COSTA MESA, CA Site 19 of 26 in cluster A Actual: RGA LUST: 27 ft. 2003 J RAY SANDERSON/CARDINAL 375 BRISTOL ST S 1000219077 RGA LUST S114636154 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 27 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site A20 DAN'S AUTOCARE EXPRESS INC Target 375 S BRISTOL ST STE 90 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Actual: 27 ft. Site 20 of 26 in cluster A HAZNET: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: envid Year: S113139139 2012 CAL000298743 DANIEL KROGH 7149796630 Not reported 375 S BRISTOL ST STE 90 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Orange NVR000082925 Not reported Not reported Not reported 0.42 Orange EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S113139139 2012 CAL000298743 DANIEL KROGH 7149796630 Not reported 375 S BRISTOL ST STE 90 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Orange NVR000001925 99 Not reported Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect 0.2604 Orange S113139139 2011 CAL000298743 DANIEL KROGH 7149796630 Not reported 375 S BRISTOL ST STE 90 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported CAT080013352 Not reported Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect 0.4662 Orange S113139139 2010 HAZNET S113139139 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 28 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site DAN'S AUTOCARE EXPRESS INC (Continued) GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CAL000298743 DANIEL KROGH 7149796630 Not reported 375 S BRISTOL ST STE 90 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported CAT080013352 Not reported Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect 0.1302 Orange S113139139 2009 CAL000298743 DANIEL KROGH 7149796630 Not reported 375 S BRISTOL ST STE 90 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Not reported CAT080013352 Not reported Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect 0.2898 Orange Click this hgpprlink while viewing on your computer to access 6 additional CA—HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. A21 CALIFORNIA COVENTRY Target 375 BRISTOL #30 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Actual: 27 ft. Site 21 of 26 in cluster A HAZNET: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: S113078316 1997 CAL000142853 CHARLES WISNIEWSKI 0000000000 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST SUITE 70 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported CAD050806850 Not reported Waste oil and mixed oil Recycler .4587 Orange S113139139 HAZNET S113078316 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 29 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number A22 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 1015456183 Target 375 BRISTOL ST N/A Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 22 of 26 in cluster A Actual: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 27 ft. Name: DR AUTOPLEX Year: 1999 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS Year: 2001 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: PRIORITY AUTO CARE Year: 2002 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: AUTOCARE EXPRESS Year: 2003 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: SAEILO MOTORS Year: 2004 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: EURO MANIA AUTOMOTIVE Year: 2005 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: AUTOWISE Year: 2006 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: SAEILO MOTORS INC Year: 2007 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS Year: 2008 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: AUTOCARE EXPRESS Year: 2009 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: FAST LANE CAR CARE Year: 2010 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS Year: 2011 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST Name: SAEILO MOTORS INC Year: 2012 Address: 375 BRISTOL ST TC4397232.2s Page 30 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number A23 BRISTOL AUTOPLEX HAZNET S113063708 Target 375 BRISTOL STREET N/A Property COSTA MESSA, CA 92626 Site 23 of 26 in cluster A Actual: HAZNET: 27 ft. envid: S113063708 Year: 2012 GEPAID: CAL000112045 Contact: SCOTT RIMLAND/PRESIDENT Telephone: 7145571934 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 50 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 7.2975 Facility County: Orange envid: S113063708 Year: 2012 GEPAID: CAL000112045 Contact: SCOTT RIMLAND/PRESIDENT Telephone: 7145571934 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 50 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 7.2975 Facility County: Orange envid: S113063708 Year: 2007 GEPAID: CAL000112045 Contact: SCOTT RIMLAND/PRESIDENT Telephone: 7145571934 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 50 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD981696420 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified oil -containing waste Disposal Method: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010 -H129) Or (H131 -H135) Tons: 1.08 Facility County: Orange envid: S113063708 TC4397232.2s Page 31 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site BRISTOL AUTOPLEX (Continued) Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: 2007 CAL000112045 SCOTT RIMLAND/PRESIDENT 7145571934 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 50 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported CAD981696420 Not reported Unspecified oil -containing waste Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129)Or(HI 31-H135) 1.08 Orange S113063708 2006 CAL000112045 SCOTT RIMLAND/PRESIDENT 7145571934 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 50 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported AZR000501510 Not reported Unspecified oil -containing waste Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129)Or(H131-H135) 1.16 Orange C;lirk this h gnarlink while viewing on your computer to access 13 additional CA—HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. A24 EURO WEST INC Target 375 S BRISTOL Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Actual: 27 ft. Site 24 of 26 in cluster A HAZNET: envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: S113109810 2006 CAL000217157 ERICK VOSS 7143085061 Not reported 375 S BRISTOL UNIT #70 COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Not reported NVR000037432 Not reported Unspecified aqueous solution Recycler 0.22 Orange EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S113063708 HAZNET S113109810 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 32 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number EURO WEST INC (Continued) S113109810 envid: S113109810 Year: 2005 GEPAID: CAL000217157 Contact: ERICK VOSS Telephone: 7145569241 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 S BRISTOL UNIT #70 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000037432 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 0.22 Facility County: Orange envid: S113109810 Year: 2004 GEPAID: CAL000217157 Contact: ERICK VOSS Telephone: 7145569241 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 S BRISTOL UNIT #70 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000037432 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: 0.43 Facility County: Orange envid: S113109810 Year: 2003 GEPAID: CAL000217157 Contact: ERICK VOSS Telephone: 7145569241 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 S BRISTOL UNIT #70 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000037432 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 0.22 Facility County: Orange envid: S113109810 Year: 2002 GEPAID: CAL000217157 Contact: ERICK VOSS Telephone: 7145569241 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 S BRISTOL UNIT #70 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 33 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site EURO WEST INC (Continued) TSD EPA ID: NVR000001925 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified aqueous solution Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 0.22 Facility County: Orange Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access additional CA—HAZNET: detail in the EDR Site Report. A25 THE DING KING Target 375 BRISTOL ST STE 30 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 25 of 26 in cluster A Actual: HAZNET: 27 ft. envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: Facility County: S113776408 2012 CAC002689519 TODD SUDECK 9499813464 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 30 COSTA MESA, CA 926267904 Orange CAD982444481 San Bernardino Not reported Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010 -H129) Or (H1 31 -H1 35) 0.0825 Orange A26 CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS Target 375 BRISTOL ST STE 100 Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 26 of 26 in cluster A Actual: HAZNET: 27 ft. envid: Year: GEPAID: Contact: Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address: Mailing City,St,Zip: Gen County: TSD EPA ID: TSD County: Waste Category: Disposal Method: Tons: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S113067651 2012 CAL000120379 JOHN COUCH/OWNER 7145577587 Not reported 375 BRISTOL ST STE 100 COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Orange NVR000001925 99 Not reported Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect 0.231 S113109810 HAZNET S113776408 N/A HAZNET S113067651 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 34 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS (Continued) S113067651 Facility County: Orange envid: S113067651 Year: 2012 GEPAID: CAL000120379 Contact: JOHN COUCH/OWNER Telephone: 7145577587 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 100 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVR000001925 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange envid: S113067651 Year: 2010 GEPAID: CAL000120379 Contact: JOHN COUCH/OWNER Telephone: 7145577587 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 100 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.21 Facility County: Orange envid: S113067651 Year: 2010 GEPAID: CAL000120379 Contact: JOHN COUCH/OWNER Telephone: 7145577587 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 100 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.21 Facility County: Orange envid: S113067651 Year: 2008 GEPAID: CAL000120379 Contact: JOHN COUCH/OWNER TC4397232.2s Page 35 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS (Continued) S113067651 Telephone: 7145577587 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 375 BRISTOL ST STE 100 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267905 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAT080025711 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010 -H129) Or (H131 -H135) Tons: 0.231 Facility County: Orange TC4397232.2s Page 36 Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access 7 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. B27 EDR US Hist Cleaners 1015042351 NW 320 BRISTOL ST N/A 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.179 mi. 946 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster B Relative: EDR Historical Cleaners: Higher Name: REDHILL CLEANERS Year: 2003 Actual: Address: 320 BRISTOL ST 48 ft. Name: REDHILL CLEANERS Year: 2005 Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Name: REDHILL CLEANERS Year: 2006 Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Name: REDHILL CLEANERS Year: 2007 Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Name: RED HILL CLEANERS Year: 2008 Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Name: REDHILL CLEANERS Year: 2010 Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Name: REDHILL CLEANERS Year: 2011 Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Name: REDHILL CLEANERS Year: 2012 Address: 320 BRISTOL ST TC4397232.2s Page 36 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site B28 REDHILL DRYCLEANERS NW 320 BRISTOL ST STE C 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.179 mi. EPA ID: 946 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster B Relative: DRYCLEANERS: Higher EPA Id: DOAITI IBRANIM NAICS Code: Actual: NAICS Description: 48 ft. SIC Code: US SIC Description: (714) 549-9192 Create Date: Not reported Facility Active: 09 Inactive Date: Small Small Quantity Generator Facility Addr2: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous Owner Name: waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Owner Address: hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous Owner Address 2: waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of Owner Telephone: hazardous waste at any time Contact Name: Contact Address: Contact Address 2: Contact Telephone: Mailing Name: Mailing Address 1: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City: Mailing State: Mailing Zip: Owner Fax: Region Code: B29 COUNTRY STYLE CLEANERS NW 320 BRISTOL ST 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.179 mi. 946 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster B Relative: RCRA-SQG MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number DRYCLEANERS S108541232 N/A CAL000303898 81232 Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin -Operated) 7211 Power Laundries, Family and Commercial 02/27/2006 Yes Not reported Not reported FAZAL KAZI 320 BRISTOL ST STE C Not reported 7147544322 FAZAL KAZI 320 BRISTOL ST STE C Not reported 7147544322 Not reported 320 BRISTOL ST STE C Not reported COSTA MESA CA 926267946 Not reported 0000000000 RCRA-SQG 1001023073 FINDS CAR000004242 HAZNET Higher Date form received by agency: 07/12/1995 Facility name: COUNTRY STYLE CLEANERS Actual: Facility address: 320 BRISTOL ST 48 ft. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EPA ID: CAR000004242 Mailing address: BRISTOL ST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact: DOAITI IBRANIM Contact address: 320 BRISTOL ST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 549-9192 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time TC4397232.2s Page 37 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site COUNTRY STYLE CLEANERS (Continued) Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: IBRAHIM DOAITI 320 BRISTOL ST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Not reported (714) 549-9192 Private Owner Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status FINDS: Registry ID: No violations found 110002907043 Environmental Interest/Information System EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1001023073 TC4397232.2s Page 38 RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. HAZNET: envid: 1001023073 Year: 1997 GEPAID: CAR000004242 Contact: TAREK CHAHINE Telephone: 7145499192 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267946 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD981397417 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perch Ioroethylene, 1001023073 TC4397232.2s Page 38 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number COUNTRY STYLE CLEANERS (Continued) 1001023073 etc) Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 1.0425 Facility County: Orange envid: 1001023073 Year: 1996 GEPAID: CAR000004242 Contact: TAREK CHAHINE Telephone: 7145499192 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267946 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD981397417 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perch loroethylene, Disposal Method: etc) Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 2.6776 Facility County: Orange envid: 1001023073 Year: 1995 GEPAID: CAR000004242 Contact: TAREK CHAHINE Telephone: 7145499192 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267946 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD981397417 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, Disposal Method: etc) Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 1.9600 Facility County: Orange envid: 1001023073 Year: 1995 GEPAID: CAR000004242 Contact: TAREK CHAHINE Telephone: 7145499192 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 320 BRISTOL ST Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926267946 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD981397417 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .0000 Facility County: Orange TC4397232.2s Page 39 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number C30 KYOWA OF AMERICA CORPORATION RCRA-SQG 1000434990 NNE 385 CLINTON ST CAD982016347 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.194 mi. 1026 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster C Relative: RCRA-SQG Higher Date form received by agency: 07/24/1987 Facility name: KYOWA OF AMERICA CORPORATION Actual: Facility address: 385 CLINTON ST 51 ft. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EPA ID: CAD982016347 Contact: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Contact address: 385 CLINTON ST Owner COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 641-0411 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Land type: Other land type Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: SUMITO FURUYA Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No TC4397232.2s Page 40 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site KYOWA OF AMERICA CORPORATION (Continued) Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Regulation violated: Not reported Area of violation: Generators - General Date violation determined: 03/30/2005 Date achieved compliance: 04/22/2005 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action date: 03/30/2005 Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: State Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Evaluation Action Summary Evaluation date: 03/30/2005 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: Generators - General Date achieved compliance: 04/22/2005 Evaluation lead agency: State Contractor/Grantee Evaluation date: 05/17/2004 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Evaluation lead agency: State Contractor/Grantee C31 KOBOWAY INC NNE 380 CLINTON ST 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.198 mi. 1046 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster C Relative: CERC-NFRAP: Higher Site ID: Federal Facility: Actual: NPL Status: 51 ft. Non NPL Status: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CERC-NFRAP RCRA-SQG HIST UST FINDS 0901528 Not a Federal Facility Not on the NPL NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: Contact Sequence ID: 13289274.00000 Person ID: 13003854.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13294869.00000 Person ID: 13003858.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13300727.00000 Person ID: 13004003.00000 1000434990 1000343968 CAD067656025 TC4397232.2s Page 41 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number KOBOWAY INC (Continued) KOBOWAY INC CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: Action: DISCOVERY Date Started: 380 CLINTON ST Date Completed: 08/01/80 Priority Level: Not reported Action: ARCHIVE SITE Date Started: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Date Completed: 10/01/85 Priority Level: Not reported Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Date Started: 02/01/85 Date Completed: 10/01/85 Priority Level: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information RCRA-SQG: KOBOWAY INC Date form received by agency: 09/01/1996 Facility name: KOBOWAY INC Facility address: 380 CLINTON ST Not reported COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EPA ID: CAD067656025 Mailing address: 380 CLINTON Owner COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact: Not reported Contact address: Not reported Not reported Contact country: us Contact telephone: Not reported Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: KOBOWAY INC Owner/operator address: 380 CLINTON COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (714) 556-4730 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: KOBOWAY INC Owner/operator address: 380 CLINTON CITY NOT REPORTED, CA 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (714) 556-4730 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator 1000343968 TC4397232.2s Page 42 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number KOBOWAY INC (Continued) 1000343968 Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: KOBOWAY INC U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 03/29/1990 Site name: FELA PRECISION INC/KOBOWAY INC. Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 08/15/1980 Site name: KOBOWAY INC Classification: Large Quantity Generator Violation Status: No violations found HIST UST: 00002500 Region: STATE Facility ID: 00000016659 Facility Type: Other Other Type: CIRCUIT BOARD SHOP Contact Name: MRS MARY WATHEN Telephone: 7145584730 Owner Name: KOBOWAY, INC. Owner Address: 380 CLINTON ST Owner City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Total Tanks: 0001 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: HMR 001 Year Installed: 1981 Tank Capacity: 00002500 Tank Used for: WASTE Type of Fuel: Not reported Container Construction Thickness: 0.5 Leak Detection: Visual FINDS: Registry ID: 110002655289 TC4397232.2s Page 43 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation C32 NNE 1/8-1/4 0.198 mi. 1046 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 51 ft. C33 NNE 1/8-1/4 0.198 mi. 1046 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 51 ft. Site MAP FINDINGS KOBOWAY INC (Continued) Environmental Interest/Information System EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. R K B INVESTMENTS 380 CLINTON ST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 3 of 4 in cluster C CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNs Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: R K B INVESTMENTS 380 CLINTON ST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 4 of 4 in cluster C UST: Facility ID: Permitting Agency: Latitude: Longitude: 30008693 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported 7145564730 Not reported C/O JFI ENGINEERS 17 Not reported COSTA MESA 92626 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active SWEEPS UST: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: 1185 ORANGE COUNTY 33.6684885 -117.8753339 Active 1185 9 Not reported 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-001185-000026 1000343968 CA FID UST S101589373 N/A UST 0003803134 SWEEPS UST N/A TC4397232.2s Page 44 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site R K B INVESTMENTS (Continued) Tank Status: A Capacity: 3000 Active Date: Not reported Tank Use: UNKNOWN STG: P Content: Not reported Number Of Tanks: 1 34 GUNTHERS PRINTING North 3188 BLDG F AIRWAY AVE 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.200 mi. 1058 ft. Relative: RCRA NonGen / NLR EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003803134 RCRA NonGen / NLR 1000409143 FINDS CAD982522930 HAZNET Higher Date form received by agency: 04/13/1989 Facility name: GUNTHERS PRINTING Actual: Facility address: 3188 BLDG F AIRWAY AVE 46 ft. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EPA ID: CAD982522930 Mailing address: BLDG F AIRWAY AVE COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Contact address: 3188 BLDG F AIRWAY AVE COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 556-3660 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: LEIDER COLETTE NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415) 555-1212 Private Owner Not reported Not reported NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415) 555-1212 Private Operator Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No TC4397232.2s Page 45 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site GUNTHERS PRINTING (Continued) Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status FINDS: Registry ID No violations found 110002841480 Environmental Interest/Information System EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000409143 D35 RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource UST 0003898712 Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of 1512 SE BRISTOL ST events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, 1/8-1/4 and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. HAZNET: Site 1 of 5 in cluster D envid: 1000409143 Year: 1993 GEPAID: CAD982522930 Contact: Not reported Telephone: 0000000000 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3188 BLDG F AIRWAY AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESSA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD982524613 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Photochemicals/photoprocessing waste Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 5.00000000000 Facility County: Orange 1000409143 D35 SOUTH COAST SHELL UST 0003898712 NW 1512 SE BRISTOL ST N/A 1/8-1/4 SANTA ANA, CA 92707 0.208 mi. 1099 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster D Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: 2357 Permitting Agency: SANTA ANA, CITY OF Actual: Latitude: 33.6675179 49 ft. Longitude: -117.880722 TC4397232.2s Page 46 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site D36 NW 1/8-1/4 0.208 mi. 1099 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 49 ft. D37 NW 1/8-1/4 0.215 mi. 1136 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 49 ft. D38 NW 1/8-1/4 0.215 mi. 1136 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 49 ft. SOUTH COAST SHELL 1512 SE BRISTOL ST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 2 of 5 in cluster D ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0047260 MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number UST 0003933325 N/A TESORO ARCO #42076 UST 0003779068 300 BRISTOL ST N/A COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 3 of 5 in cluster D UST: Name: Facility ID: 18456 Permitting Agency: ORANGE COUNTY Latitude: 33.6680067 Longitude: -117.8802045 ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0063272 TC4397232.2s Page 47 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 1015399426 300 BRISTOL ST N/A COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 4 of 5 in cluster D EDR Historical Auto Stations: Name: ARCO AM PM STORE Year: 2005 Address: 300 BRISTOL ST Name: ARCO AM PM STORE 5994 Year: 2006 Address: 300 BRISTOL ST Name: ARCO AM PM STORE 5994 Year: 2007 Address: 300 BRISTOL ST Name: ARCO AM PM Year: 2008 Address: 300 BRISTOL ST Name: BRISTOL GAS & MARKET Year: 2011 Address: 300 BRISTOL ST TC4397232.2s Page 47 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site D39 BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON NW 300 BRISTOL 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.215 mi. DENAMARIE BAKER 1136 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster D Relative: LUST: Higher Region: Email: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 49 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST S103650567 HAZNET N/A STATE T0605902077 33.6666664118938 -117.881659269333 Not reported Completed - Case Closed 01/02/2013 Not reported DB Not reported 083003044T Not reported Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Please refer to recent Site Documents or Monitoring Reports in GeoTracker for site history. Orange County is not responsible for the accuracy of any professional interpretations provided in reports submitted by consultants for the responsible party. Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility Contact: T0605902077 Global Id: T0605902077 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605902077 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9513202007 Status History: Global Id: T0605902077 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 01/02/2013 Global Id: T0605902077 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 06/27/1996 Global Id: T0605902077 Status: Open - Remediation TC4397232.2s Page 48 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON (Continued) S103650567 Status Date: 10/18/2002 Global Id: T0605902077 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 11/14/2004 Global Id: T0605902077 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 12/12/1996 Global Id: T0605902077 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date: 03/16/2010 Regulatory Activities Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/15/2008 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 04/01/2003 Action: Excavation Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/10/2012 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/15/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/01/2011 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/28/2010 Action: File review Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/22/2012 Action: Notification - Preclosure Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/04/1997 Action: Notice of Responsibility Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT TC4397232.2s Page 49 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON (Continued) S103650567 Date: 04/09/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/17/2004 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/02/2005 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 09/22/2005 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/20/2005 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/23/2007 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/17/2007 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/22/2012 Action: Notification - Preclosure Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/22/2011 Action: File review Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/16/2010 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/13/2010 Action: File review Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 03/18/2010 Action: Clean Up Fund - 5 -Year Review Summary TC4397232.2s Page 50 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON (Continued) S103650567 Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: Other Date: 07/25/1997 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/12/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/02/2013 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/22/2012 Action: Notification - Preclosure Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11/25/2008 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: Other Date: 06/27/1996 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/01/2008 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/13/2007 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 05/19/2008 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/21/2007 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 11/14/2004 Action: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE) Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT TC4397232.2s Page 51 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON (Continued) S103650567 Date: 01/22/2008 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/21/2008 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11/27/2012 Action: Notification - Preclosure Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/24/2011 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 10/27/2005 Action: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE) Global Id: T0605902077 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 07/13/2009 Action: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE) ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 97UT025 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 01/08/2013 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0001621 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Remediation Plan Case Number: 083003044T Local Case Num: 97UT025 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: SEL Funding: Not reported How Discovered: SA How Stopped: Other Means Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: D TC4397232.2s Page 52 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON (Continued) S103650567 Global ID: T0605902077 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 6/27/1996 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: 12/12/1996 Date Remediation Plan Submitted: 10/18/2002 Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: _ Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.666695 Longitude: -117.882091 MTBE Date: 4/7/2004 Max MTBE GW: 5800 MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Class: Staff: TME Staff Initials: AR Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported HAZNET: envid: S103650567 Year: 2013 GEPAID: CAL000385628 Contact: ROSIE RANGEL Telephone: 2106266564 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 19100 RIDGEWOOD PKWY Mailing City,St,Zip: SAN ANTONIO, TX 782590000 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVT330010000 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( To Include On -Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Tons: 0.005 Facility County: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 53 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site E40 UNOCAL #5909 NW 1476 BRISTOL 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.239 mi. NANCY OLSON-MARTIN 1264 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster E Relative: LUST: Higher Region: Email: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 49 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST S101299432 HIST CORTESE N/A STATE T0605901145 33.727577 -117.885177 Not reported Completed - Case Closed 03/10/2000 Not reported DB Not reported 083001502T Not reported Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility Contact: T0605901145 Global Id: T0605901145 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported Global Id: T0605901145 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Status History: Global Id: T0605901145 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 03/10/2000 Global Id: T0605901145 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 04/16/1990 Regulatory Activities Global Id: T0605901145 Action Type: Other Date: 04/16/1990 Action: Leak Reported TC4397232.2s Page 54 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site UNOCAL #5909 (Continued) Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: Facility Id: Current Status: Released Substance Date Closed: Case Type: Record ID: MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number T0605901145 Other 04/16/1990 Leak Discovery ORANGE 90UT109 Certification (Case Closed) Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded 03/10/2000 Other Ground Water RO0001968 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083001502T Local Case Num: 90UT109 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605901145 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 4/16/1990 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 3/10/2000 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.727577 Longitude: -117.885177 MTBE Date: Not reported S101299432 TC4397232.2s Page 55 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site UNOCAL #5909 (Continued) Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: Not reported HIST CORTESE: Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083001502T E41 UNOCAL SERVICE STATION #5909 NW 1476 SOUTH EAST BRISTOL S 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 90220 1/4-1/2 0.239 mi. 0.261 mi. 1264 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster E 1377 ft. Relative: NOTIFY 65: Relative: Higher Date Reported: Not reported Region: Staff Initials: Not reported Actual: Board File Number: Not reported 49 ft. Facility Type: Not reported Longitude: Discharge Date: Not reported Case Type: Incident Description: 90220 MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101299432 Not reported 0 Not reported 1 Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed NOM AR Local Agency 30000L Not reported MUN Not reported Not reported Not reported 42 DOLLAR RENTAL CAR SE 2152 BRISTOL 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92707 0.261 mi. 1377 ft. Relative: LUST: Higher Region: STATE Global Id: T0605902234 Actual: Latitude: 33.6601893 53 ft. Longitude: -117.8732008 Case Type: Not reported Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 01/22/2001 Lead Agency: Not reported Case Worker: KL Local Agency: Not reported RB Case Number: 083003337T LOC Case Number: Not reported Notify 65 S100230462 N/A LUST S101631448 SWEEPS UST N/A CA FID UST HIST CORTESE TC4397232.2s Page 56 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number DOLLAR RENTAL CAR (Continued) S101631448 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility Contact: T0605902234 Global Id: T0605902234 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9513202007 Global Id: T0605902234 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: KEVIN LAMBERT Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E DYER ROAD SUITE 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: klambert@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336261 Status History: Global Id: T0605902234 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 01/22/2001 Global Id: T0605902234 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 12/17/1998 Regulatory Activities Global Id: T0605902234 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/26/2000 Action: LOP Case Closure Summary to RB Global Id: T0605902234 Action Type: Other Date: 12/17/1998 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605902234 Action Type: Other Date: 12/17/1998 Action: Leak Discovery ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 98UT109 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) TC4397232.2s Page 57 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number DOLLAR RENTAL CAR (Continued) S101631448 Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 01/22/2001 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0001397 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083003337T Local Case Num: 98UT109 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605902234 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 12/17/1998 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 1/22/2001 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6601893 Longitude: -117.8732008 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: Staff: TME Staff Initials: AR Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 58 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site DOLLAR RENTAL CAR (Continued) Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: Not reported SWEEPS UST: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNS Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: HIST CORTESE: Region: Facility County Code Reg By: Reg Id: MAP FINDINGS Active 10034 9 44-016798 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-010034-000001 A 10000 Not reported M.V. FUEL P REG UNLEADED 1 30017637 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 2132 S HARBOR BLVD Not reported SANTA ANA 92707 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083003337T MUN Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101631448 TC4397232.2s Page 59 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number F43 THRIFTY OIL #008 LUST S102439054 NW 704 HIST CORTESE N/A 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92700 0.272 mi. 1434 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster F Relative: LUST REG 8: Higher Region: 8 County: Orange Actual: Regional Board: Santa Ana Region 51 ft. Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway Case Number: 083000764T Local Case Num: Not reported Case Type: Aquifer affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: Not reported Abate Method: Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose in approved site Cross Street: 7TH Enf Type: SI Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Not reported Leak Cause: UNK Leak Source: LINK Global ID: T0605900604 How Stopped Date: Not reported Enter Date: 9/18/1996 Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 10/27/1994 Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 10/27/1994 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: 11/21/2003 Date Remediation Plan Submitted: 1/16/2003 Date Remedial Action Underway: 7/28/2004 Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: 9/18/1996 GW Qualifies: _ Soil Qualifies: _ Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.75071575 Longitude: -117.8853749 MTBE Date: 11/10/1998 Max MTBE GW: 29000 MTBE Concentration: 1 Max MTBE Soil: 809 MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Class: A Staff: Vii Staff Initials: JB Lead Agency: Regional Board Local Agency: Santa Ana, Orange County Hydr Basin #: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA TC4397232.2s Page 60 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number F44 NW 1/4-1/2 0.295 mi. 1558 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 50 ft. THRIFTY OIL #008 (Continued) S102439054 Beneficial: Not reported Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: LAST COMMUNICATION WAS 3/27/89. REOPENED 10/27/94. EXCAVATION AT TANK AREA TO RE -LINE (1) 10,000 GAL TANK REVEALED SOIL W/ SOME CONTAM. SOIL WILL BE PUT BACK IN EXCAVATION TO BE REMEDIATED W/ REST OF SITE. 7/19/96 - TANK TEST FAILED HIST CORTESE: Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083000764T AL & J'S CLEANERS 270 BRISTOL STREET, NO. 106 (1 F) COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 2 of 2 in cluster F ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: 30720003 Refer: 1248 Local Agency 04/08/2004 Not reported Evaluation Evaluation Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported Referred - Not Assigned Cleanup Cypress 68 Not reported Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED Not Applicable 0 0 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED 30720003 Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported ENVIROSTOR S106797623 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 61 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number AL & J'S CLEANERS (Continued) S106797623 Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported G45 ALAMO RENT A CAR HIST CORTESE S102423819 SE 3510 IRVINE N/A 1/4-1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.296 mi. 1561 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster G Relative: HIST CORTESE: Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 54 ft. Reg Id: 083002612T G46 ALAMO RENT A CAR LUST S101589586 SE 3500 IRVINE CA FID UST N/A 1/4-1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.298 mi. 1571 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster G Relative: LUST: Higher Region: STATE Global Id: T0605901821 Actual: Latitude: 33.6620103 54 ft. Longitude: -117.8752279 Case Type: Not reported Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 11/27/1995 Lead Agency: Not reported Case Worker: DB Local Agency: Not reported RB Case Number: 083002612T LOC Case Number: Not reported File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Gasoline Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Contact: Global Id: T0605901821 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 TC4397232.2s Page 62 Map ID Global Id: MAP FINDINGS Action Type: Direction Date: 12/22/1994 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605901821 Distance Other EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: ALAMO RENT A CAR (Continued) S101589586 Not reported Global Id: T0605901821 Funding: Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Tank Closure Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Status History: Global Id: T0605901821 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 11/27/1995 Global Id: T0605901821 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 12/22/1994 Regulatory Activities: Global Id: T0605901821 Action Type: Other Date: 12/22/1994 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605901821 Action Type: Other Date: 12/22/1994 Action: Leak Discovery ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 94UT070 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 11/27/1995 Case Type: Soil Only Record ID: RO0002688 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083002612T Local Case Num: 94UT070 Case Type: Soil only Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank TC4397232.2s Page 63 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number ALAMO RENT A CAR (Continued) S101589586 Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605901821 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 12/22/1994 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 11/27/1995 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6620103 Longitude: -117.8752279 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: Staff: CAB Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported CA FID UST: Facility ID: 30017666 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: Not reported Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 7148520403 Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 110 SE 6TH ST Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: NEWPORT BEACH 92660 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNS Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 64 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site ALAMO RENT A CAR (Continued) EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active 47 BRISTOL VILLAGE CLEANERS NW 260 BRISTOL ST 1/4-1/2 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.303 mi. 1602 ft. Relative: RCRA-SQG EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101589586 RCRA-SQG 1000389232 SLIC CAD981999139 Orange Co. Industrial Site FINDS Higher Date form received by agency: 12/21/1993 Facility name: BRISTOL VILLAGE CLEANERS Actual: Facility address: 260 BRISTOL ST 50 ft. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EPA ID: CAD981999139 Contact: HYOUNG KIM Contact address: 260 BRISTOL ST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 754-1351 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: HYOUNG KIM 260 BRISTOL ST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Not reported (714) 754-1351 Private Owner Not reported Not reported NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415) 555-1212 Private Operator Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No TC4397232.2s Page 65 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site BRISTOL VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: No violations found SLIC: Region: Facility Status: Status Date: Global Id: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Case Number: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number STATE Completed - Case Closed 01/16/1997 SLT8R0613945 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) 971C002 33.6663114340909 -117.912097261932 Cleanup Program Site Not reported Not reported SLT8R061 Not reported Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), Soil Tetrachloroethylene (PCE), Trichloroethylene (TCE) Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: SLIC REG 8: Type: Facility Status: Staff: Substance: Lead Agency: Location Code: Thomas Bros Code: Orange Co. Industrial Site Soil and Groundwater 3 WDM TCE, PCE Regional Board CM -8 859-D7 Case ID: 971C002 Region: ORANGE Record ID: RO0000588 Current Status: CLOSED, 1/16/1997 Closure Type: Closure certification issued Released Chemical: PERCHLOROETHYLENE FINDS: Registry ID: 110002771947 Environmental Interest/Information System RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource 1000389232 TC4397232.2s Page 66 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site H48 NNE 1/4-1/2 0.311 mi. 1642 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 53 ft. BRISTOL VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. SUPERFORMANCE 2950 AIRWAY COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 1 of 3 in cluster H LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: STATE T0605901795 33.668012 -117.876549 Not reported Completed - Case Closed 05/10/1996 Not reported DB Not reported 083002555T Not reported Local Agency Soil Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility Contact: T0605901795 Global Id: T0605901795 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported Global Id: T0605901795 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Status History: Global Id: T0605901795 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 05/10/1996 Global Id: T0605901795 1000389232 LUST S100616651 HIST CORTESE N/A TC4397232.2s Page 67 Map ID SUPERFORMANCE LUST 0003784931 MAP FINDINGS 2950 AIRWAY AVE Direction 1/4-1/2 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.311 mi. Distance 1642 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster H EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Region: 8 County: SUPERFORMANCE (Continued) S100616651 Regional Board: Status: 53 ft. Open - Case Begin Date Case Closed Status Date: Case Number: 05/24/1993 Regulatory Activities: 93UT044 Case Type: Global Id: T0605901795 Waste Oil Action Type: Qty Leaked: Other Date: Not reported 05/24/1993 Cross Street: Action: Leak Reported Not reported Global Id: Funding: T0605901795 Action Type: Tank Closure Other How Stopped: Date: 05/24/1993 Unknown Action: Leak Source: Leak Discovery ORANGE CO. LUST: T0605901795 How Stopped Date: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 93UT044 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Waste oil/Used oil Date Closed: 05/10/1996 Case Type: Soil Only Record ID: RO0002023 HIST CORTESE: Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083002555T H49 SUPERFORMANCE LUST 0003784931 NNE 2950 AIRWAY AVE UST N/A 1/4-1/2 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.311 mi. 1642 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster H Relative: LUST REG 8: Higher Region: 8 County: Orange Actual: Regional Board: Santa Ana Region 53 ft. Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083002555T Local Case Num: 93UT044 Case Type: Soil only Substance: Waste Oil Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605901795 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 TC4397232.2s Page 68 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SUPERFORMANCE (Continued) Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 5/24/1993 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 5/10/1996 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.669051 Longitude: -117.8769799 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 0 MTBE Tested: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Class: Staff: NOM Staff Initials: AR Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported UST: Facility ID: Permitting Agency: Latitude: Longitude: 8696 ORANGE COUNTY 33.669441 -117.875354 H50 SUPERFORMANCE NNE 2950 AIRWAY AVENUE A5 1/4-1/2 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.311 mi. 1642 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster H Relative: SWEEPS UST: Higher Status: Active Comp Number: 8696 Actual: Number: 9 53 ft. Board Of Equalization: 44-016707 Referral Date: 09-30-92 Action Date: 09-15-92 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003784931 SWEEPS UST S101589572 CA FID UST N/A HIST CORTESE TC4397232.2s Page 69 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 151 West 1/4-1/2 0.311 mi. 1643 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 41 ft. SUPERFORMANCE (Continued) Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: Not reported SWRCB Tank Id: 30-000-008696-000001 Tank Status: A Capacity: 280 Active Date: Not reported Tank Use: PETROLEUM STG: P Content: Not reported Number Of Tanks: 1 CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNs Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: 30017612 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported 7149660999 Not reported 2950 AIRWAY AVE Not reported COSTA MESA 92626 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active HIST CORTESE: Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083000095T Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083003124T SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB 20241 SANTA ANA SANTA ANA, CA 92707 Site 1 of 2 in cluster I LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: STATE T0605902156 33.664042 -117.885888 Not reported Completed - Case Closed 04/23/1999 Not reported KL EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101589572 LUST 0003659696 UST N/A SWEEPS UST HIST CORTESE TC4397232.2s Page 70 Map ID T0605902156 MAP FINDINGS Direction Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Distance NANCY OLSON-MARTIN EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number City: SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB (Continued) 0003659696 Email: Local Agency: Not reported Not reported RB Case Number: 083003171T Action Type: LOC Case Number: Not reported 11/09/1998 File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Diesel, Gasoline Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility Contact: T0605902156 Global Id: T0605902156 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTIN Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: Not reported Global Id: T0605902156 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: KEVIN LAMBERT Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E DYER ROAD SUITE 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: klambert@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336261 Status History: Global Id: T0605902156 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 04/23/1999 Global Id: T0605902156 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 04/23/1998 Regulatory Activities: Global Id: T0605902156 Action Type: Other Date: 04/23/1998 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605902156 Action Type: Other Date: 04/23/1998 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605902156 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 11/09/1998 Action: Excavation Global Id: T0605902156 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/26/1999 TC4397232.2s Page 71 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB (Continued) Action: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: Closure/No Further Action Letter STATE T0605900564 33.664042 -117.885888 Not reported Completed - Case Closed 01/03/1989 Not reported KL Not reported 083000714T Not reported Local Agency Soil Diesel Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Contact: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: Status History: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Regulatory Activities: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: T0605900564 Local Agency Caseworker KEVIN LAMBERT ORANGE COUNTY LOP 1241 E DYER ROAD SUITE 120 SANTA ANA klambert@ochca.com 7144336261 T0605900564 Regional Board Caseworker PATRICIA HANNON SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 RIVERSIDE phannon@waterboards.ca.gov Not reported T0605900564 Completed - Case Closed 01/03/1989 T0605900564 Open - Case Begin Date 10/05/1987 T0605900564 Other 10/05/1987 Leak Reported T0605900564 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003659696 TC4397232.2s Page 72 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB (Continued) Action Type: Date: Action: ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: Facility Id: Current Status: Released Substance Date Closed: Case Type: Record ID: Other 10/05/1987 Leak Discovery ORANGE 87UT224 Certification (Case Closed) Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos. 1-D, 2-D, 2-4 01/03/1989 Soil Only RO0001542 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 98UT032 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos. 1-D, 2-D, 2-4 Date Closed: 04/23/1999 Case Type: Soil Only Record ID: RO0001828 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 98UT032 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 04/23/1999 Case Type: Soil Only Record ID: RO0001828 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083000714T Local Case Num: 87UT224 Case Type: Soil only Substance: Diesel Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605900564 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 10/5/1987 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 1/3/1989 0003659696 TC4397232.2s Page 73 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB (Continued) 0003659696 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.7480113 Longitude: -117.8851239 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 0 MTBE Tested: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Class: Staff: PAH Staff Initials: AR Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083003171T Local Case Num: 98UT032 Case Type: Soil only Substance: 12034,800661 Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605902156 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 4/23/1998 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 4/23/1999 TC4397232.2s Page 74 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB (Continued) Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6641531 Longitude: -117.8843551 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 0 MTBE Tested: Not Required to be Tested. MTBE Class: Staff: NOM Staff Initials: AR Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported UST: Facility ID: 8791 Permitting Agency: ORANGE COUNTY Latitude: 33.70597 Longitude: -117.86808 ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0024642 SWEEPS UST: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Active 8791 9 Not reported 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-008791-000001 A 2000 Not reported M.V. FUEL P EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003659696 TC4397232.2s Page 75 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 152 West 1/4-1/2 0.311 mi. 1643 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 41 ft. SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB (Continued) Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: HIST CORTESE: Region: Facility County Code Reg By: Reg Id: DIESEL 2 Active 8791 9 Not reported 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-008791-000002 A 2000 Not reported M.V. FUEL P LEADED Not reported SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB 20241 SANTA ANA, CA 92707 Site 2 of 2 in cluster I CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNS Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: HIST CORTESE: Region: Facility County Code Reg By: Reg Id: CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083000714T 30001714 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported 7145458235 Not reported 20382 W NEWPORT BLVD Not reported SANTA ANA 92707 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083003171T EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003659696 CA FID UST 0002096309 HIST CORTESE N/A TC4397232.2s Page 76 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site 53 NEWPORT BEACH GOLF COURSE SSW 3100 IRVINE 1/4-1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.329 mi. TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM 1736 ft. SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Relative: LUST: Lower Region: Email: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 13 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: MAP FINDINGS STATE T0605900231 33.6601103 -117.87953 Not reported Completed - Case Closed 09/15/2006 Not reported DB Not reported 083000295T Not reported Local Agency Warehouse Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility Contact: T0605900231 Global Id: T0605900231 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9513202007 Global Id: T0605900231 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Status History: Global Id: T0605900231 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 09/15/2006 Global Id: T0605900231 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 09/03/1986 Global Id: T0605900231 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 05/20/1998 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST 0001742947 CA FID UST N/A TC4397232.2s Page 77 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT BEACH GOLF COURSE (Continued) 0001742947 Regulatory Activities: Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: Other Date: 09/03/1986 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 09/15/2006 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 09/25/1986 Action: Notice of Responsibility Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/11/2003 Action: * Historical Enforcement Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/30/2003 Action: Warning Letter Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/10/2006 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/22/2004 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: Other Date: 09/03/1986 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 12/03/1986 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900231 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/10/2003 Action: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action Plan ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 86UT158 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) TC4397232.2s Page 78 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NEWPORT BEACH GOLF COURSE (Continued) 0001742947 Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 09/15/2006 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0002204 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Remediation Plan Case Number: 083000295T Local Case Num: 86UT158 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: SEL Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Tank Global ID: T0605900231 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 9/3/1986 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: 5/20/1998 Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6601103 Longitude: -117.87953 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: Staff: TME Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 79 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS NEWPORT BEACH GOLF COURSE (Continued) Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: Not reported CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNS Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: 30000515 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported 7148528681 Not reported 4401 SAN FERNANDO Not reported NEWPORT BEACH 92660 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active 54 COMMODORE SEMICONDUCTOR SYSTEM NNE 2955 AIRWAY AVE 1/4-1/2 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.363 mi. 1916 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 52 ft. ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: 71002508 Refer: Other Agency Not reported Not reported Tiered Permit Tiered Permit Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported Not reported Cleanup Cypress 74 37 Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED Not reported 33.66970 -117.8769 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED MUN Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0001742947 ENVIROSTOR 0001576790 HIST UST N/A EMI TC4397232.2s Page 80 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number COMMODORE SEMICONDUCTOR SYSTEM (Continued) 0001576790 Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: CAD063119796 Alias Type: EPA Identification Number Alias Name: 71002508 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Consent Agreement Completed Date: 07/07/1999 Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported HIST UST: Region: STATE Facility ID: 00000064585 Facility Type: Other Other Type: MANUFACTURING Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: 7149796300 Owner Name: COMMODORE INTERNATIONAL LIMITE Owner Address: 1200 WILLSON DRIVE Owner City,St,Zip: WESTCHESTER, PA 19380 Total Tanks: 0002 Tank Num: 001 Container Num: 1 Year Installed: 1972 Tank Capacity: 00000000 Tank Used for: WASTE Type of Fuel: Not reported Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Visual Tank Num: 002 Container Num: 2 Year Installed: 1980 Tank Capacity: 00000000 Tank Used for: WASTE Type of Fuel: Not reported Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Visual EMI: Year: 1987 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC TC4397232.2s Page 81 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site COMMODORE SEMICONDUCTOR SYSTEM (Continued) Facility ID: 58258 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 9999 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 1 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 55 SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIV. CERC-NFRAP NNE 2970 AIRWAY AVENUE Date Completed: RCRA-SQG 1/4-1/2 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Action: ENVIROSTOR 0.391 mi. Date Completed: SLIC 2067 ft. Not reported Orange Co. Industrial Site FINDS Relative: EMI Higher HAZNET Actual: CERC-NFRAP: 52 ft. Site ID: 0903532 Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility NPL Status: Not on the NPL Non NPL Status: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: Contact Sequence ID: 13290511.00000 Person ID: 13003854.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13296106.00000 Person ID: 13003858.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13301964.00000 Person ID: 13004003.00000 CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Alias Name(s): Alias Name: ZEUS MFG Alias Address: Not reported CA CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: Action: DISCOVERY Date Started: Date Completed: 12/01/87 Priority Level: Not reported Action: ARCHIVE SITE Date Started: Date Completed: 03/15/89 Priority Level: Not reported Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 0001576790 1000294703 CAD981658669 TC4397232.2s Page 82 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIV. (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Date Started: Date Completed: 03/15/89 Priority Level: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information RCRA-SQG: ANGLYNN LYNN Date form received by agency: 09/01/1996 Facility name: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Facility address: 2970 AIRWAY AVE Not reported COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EPA ID: CAD981658669 Contact: Not reported Contact address: Not reported Not reported Not reported Contact country: US Contact telephone: Not reported Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Land type: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known. Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: ANGLYNN LYNN Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No 1000294703 TC4397232.2s Page 83 Map ID Regulation violated: MAP FINDINGS Direction Generators - General Date violation determined: Distance Date achieved compliance: EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Not reported SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIV. (Continued) 1000294703 Not reported Used oil processor: No Enf. disp. status date: User oil refiner: No Not reported Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Final penalty amount: Used oil Specification marketer: No Not reported Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 09/01/1996 Site name: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Classification: Small Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03/15/1996 Site name: SIGMA CIRCUITS, INC - SOUTHERN CA DIVISI Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03/25/1994 Site name: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 02/26/1992 Site name: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 04/06/1990 Site name: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 11/11/1986 Site name: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Classification: Large Quantity Generator Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Regulation violated: FR - 262.10-12.A Area of violation: Generators - General Date violation determined: 12/02/1991 Date achieved compliance: 11/08/1993 Violation lead agency: State Enforcement action: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Evaluation Action Summary Evaluation date: 11/08/1993 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Area of violation: Not reported Date achieved compliance: Not reported Evaluation lead agency: State Contractor/Grantee Evaluation date: 12/02/1991 Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE TC4397232.2s Page 84 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIV. (Continued) 1000294703 Area of violation: Generators - General Date achieved compliance: 11/08/1993 Evaluation lead agency: State Contractor/Grantee ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: 30280370 Status: Refer: Other Agency Status Date: 10/18/1988 Site Code: Not reported Site Type: Historical Site Type Detailed: * Historical Acres: Not reported NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: NONE SPECIFIED Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED Program Manager: Not reported Supervisor: * Mmonroy Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program: * CERC2 Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported Latitude: 33.66989 Longitude: -117.8760 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS ` HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS " Metals - Other Inorganic Solid Waste * Metals - Sludge * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS * UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES * OTHER INORGANIC SOLID WASTE * POLYMERIC RESIN WASTE Not reported Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: 30280370 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 10/25/1994 Comments: Database verification project confirms NFA for DTSC. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Date: 06/23/1988 Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT COMPLETED. THERE IS A NEW COMPANY ON LOCATION KNOWN AS SIGMA CIRCUIT. SIGMA CIRCUIT LISTED AS A GENERATOR. SIGMA CIRCUIT MANUFAC- TURES PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: * Discovery Completed Date: 09/02/1982 Comments: FACILITY IDENTIFIED VIA A TIP FACILITY DRIVE-BY APPROX. 250 DRUMS AT TC4397232.2s Page 85 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIV. (Continued) 1000294703 SITE ABANDONED & ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC;SPILLS; OPEN DRUMS; CORRODED DRUMS; WATER REACTIVE DRUM ON SIDE & BUILDING. FINAL STRATEGY SITE REFERRED: TO HWMB- LA -ENF. TIP FROM CO SANIT INSPECTOR FIRM ABANDONED CHEMICALS AT FORMER SITE Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported SLIC: 861C010 Region: STATE Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 04/03/1997 Global Id: SLT8R1824103 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Lead Agency Case Number: Not reported Latitude: 33.680164 Longitude: -117.869715 Case Type: Cleanup Program Site Case Worker: Not reported Local Agency: Not reported RB Case Number: SLT8R182 File Location: Not reported Potential Media Affected: Not reported Potential Contaminants of Concern: Not reported Site History: Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Orange Co. Industrial Site Case ID: 861C010 Region: ORANGE Record ID: RO0003078 Current Status: CLOSED, 12/9/1987 Closure Type: Closed pre 1994, file review required to determine closure type Released Chemical: PLATING WASTE - OTHER METALS Case ID: 891C003 Region: ORANGE Record ID: RO0000205 Current Status: CLOSED,5/31/1991 Closure Type: Closed pre 1994, file review required to determine closure type Released Chemical: PLATING WASTE - COPPER Case ID: 891C056 Region: ORANGE Record ID: RO0000234 Current Status: CLOSED, 7/19/1991 Closure Type: Closed pre 1994, file review required to determine closure type Released Chemical: ACID WASTE TC4397232.2s Page 86 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIV. (Continued) Case ID: Region: Record ID: Current Status: Closure Type: Released Chemical I9IL4I11-11 Registry ID 961C032 ORANGE RO0000554 CLOSED,4/3/1997 Closure certification issued LEAD COMPOUNDS 110000784278 Environmental Interest/Information System US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are transported off-site. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. EMI: 1990 Year: 1987 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 45852 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 3679 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0 Year: 1990 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 45852 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 3672 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 1000294703 TC4397232.2s Page 87 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIV. (Continued) 1000294703 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 2 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1 Year: 1995 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 45852 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 3672 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 7 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 7 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0 Year: 1996 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 45852 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 3672 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 8 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 8 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0 HAZNET: envid: 1000294703 Year: 1997 GEPAID: CAD981658669 Contact: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Telephone: 4087279169 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 393 MATHEW ST Mailing City,St,Zip: SANTA CLARA, CA 950503113 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: UTD981552177 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Other inorganic solid waste Disposal Method: Treatment, Incineration Tons: 6.7424 Facility County: Orange envid: 1000294703 Year: 1996 TC4397232.2s Page 88 Map ID 1000294703 MAP FINDINGS Direction GEPAID: CAD981658669 Distance SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Telephone: Elevation Site Not reported Mailing Address: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIV. (Continued) Mailing City,St,Zip: GEPAID: CAD981658669 Not reported Contact: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC TSD County: Telephone: 4087279169 Other inorganic solid waste Mailing Name: Not reported Tons: Mailing Address: 393 MATHEW ST Orange Mailing City,St,Zip: SANTA CLARA, CA 950503113 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD097030993 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with metals (< restricted levels and (Alkaline solution (pH — 12.5) with metals)) Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 1.2510 Facility County: Orange envid: 1000294703 Year: 1996 GEPAID: CAD981658669 Contact: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Telephone: 4087279169 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 393 MATHEW ST Mailing City,St,Zip: SANTA CLARA, CA 950503113 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: UTD981552177 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Other inorganic solid waste Disposal Method: Treatment, Incineration Tons: 16.8560 Facility County: Orange envid: 1000294703 Year: 1996 GEPAID: CAD981658669 Contact: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Telephone: 4087279169 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 393 MATHEW ST Mailing City,St,Zip: SANTA CLARA, CA 950503113 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD003963592 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Invalid waste code Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .2000 Facility County: Orange envid: 1000294703 Year: 1996 GEPAID: CAD981658669 Contact: SIGMA CIRCUITS INC Telephone: 4087279169 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 393 MATHEW ST Mailing City,St,Zip: SANTA CLARA, CA 950503113 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD003963592 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000294703 TC4397232.2s Page 89 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SIGMA CIRCUITS INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIV. (Continued) TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Other inorganic solid waste Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: 2.4500 Facility County: Orange C;lir:k this h gnarlink while viewing on your computer to access 53 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. J56 EXXON SERVICE STATION #07 SE 2122 1/4-1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.411 mi. 2172 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster J Relative: HIST CORTESE: Higher Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 54 ft. Reg Id: 083002060T J57 SE 1/4-1/2 0.412 mi. 2178 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 54 ft. CHEVRON #20-2016 2121 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Site 2 of 3 in cluster J SWEEPS UST: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active 4844 9 44-000285 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-004844-000001 A 1000 Not reported PETROLEUM P Not reported 5 Active 4844 9 44-000285 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-004844-000003 A 10000 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000294703 HIST CORTESE S101307822 N/A SWEEPS UST S101609577 CA FID UST N/A HIST CORTESE TC4397232.2s Page 90 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: Not reported M.V. FUEL P DIESEL Not reported Active 4844 9 44-000285 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-004844-000004 A 8000 Not reported M.V. FUEL P REG UNLEADED Not reported Active 4844 9 44-000285 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-004844-000005 A 12000 Not reported M.V. FUEL P REG UNLEADED Not reported Active 4844 9 44-000285 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-004844-000006 A 10000 Not reported M.V. FUEL P REG UNLEADED Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101609577 TC4397232.2s Page 91 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 58 East 1/4-1/2 0.431 mi. 2276 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 52 ft. CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNs Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: HIST CORTESE: Region: Facility County Code Reg By: Reg Id: 30013428 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported 7147569740 Not reported CONSTRUCTION & MAINT Not reported NEWPORT BEACH 92660 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083003460T EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101609577 SIERRACIN TRANSMASK CORP CERC-NFRAP 1000368707 3952 N CAMPUS DR RCRA NonGen / NLR CAD042932053 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 FINDS CERC-NFRAP: Site ID: 0901346 Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility NPL Status: Not on the NPL Non NPL Status: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: Contact Sequence ID: 13288467.00000 Person ID: 13003854.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13294062.00000 Person ID: 13003858.00000 Contact Sequence ID: 13299920.00000 Person ID: 13004003.00000 CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: Action: DISCOVERY Date Started: Date Completed: 08/01/80 Priority Level: Not reported Action: ARCHIVE SITE Date Started: Date Completed: 10/01/85 TC4397232.2s Page 92 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SIERRACIN TRANSMASK CORP (Continued) Priority Level: Not reported Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Date Started: 02/01/85 Date Completed: 10/01/85 Priority Level: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information RCRA NonGen / NLR: NOT REQUIRED Date form received by agency: 08/25/1980 Facility name: SIERRACIN TRANSMASK CORP Facility address: 3952 N CAMPUS DR Not reported NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 EPA ID: CAD042932053 Mailing address: N CAMPUS DR Operator NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Contact: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER Contact address: 3952 N CAMPUS DR No NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 540-6080 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: NOT REQUIRED Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: SIERRACIN CORPORATION Owner/operator address: NOT REQUIRED Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (415) 555-1212 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No 1000368707 TC4397232.2s Page 93 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SIERRACIN TRANSMASK CORP (Continued) Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: No violations found FINDS: Registry ID: 110002644988 Environmental Interest/Information System RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. J59 CHEVRON #20-2016 SE 2121 BRISTOL 1/4-1/2 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 0.436 mi. 2302 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster J Relative: LUST: Higher Region: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 54 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: STATE T0605901528 33.6617423 -117.8750999 Not reported Completed - Case Closed 03/01/2001 Not reported DB Not reported 083002060T Not reported Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Contact: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: Global Id: T0605901528 Regional Board Caseworker CARLBERNHARDT SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 RIVERSIDE cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov 9517824495 T0605901528 1000368707 LUST S103956009 CHMIRS N/A TC4397232.2s Page 94 Map ID T0605901528 MAP FINDINGS Direction Action Type: Other Distance 05/11/1992 EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Action Type: CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) S103956009 03/01/2001 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Local Agency: Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER 083003460T Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Status History: Global Id: T0605901528 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 03/01/2001 Global Id: T0605901528 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 05/11/1992 Regulatory Activities: T0605901528 Global Id: T0605901528 Action Type: Other Date: 05/11/1992 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605901528 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/01/2001 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Global Id: T0605901528 Action Type: Other Date: 05/11/1992 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605901528 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 11/01/1996 Action: Other (Use Description Field) Global Id: T0605901528 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 11/01/1996 Action: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Region: STATE Global Id: T0605902282 Latitude: 33.6614425770348 Longitude: -117.875275611877 Case Type: Not reported Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 01/17/2014 Lead Agency: Not reported Case Worker: DB Local Agency: Not reported RB Case Number: 083003460T LOC Case Number: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 95 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number File Location: Local Agency Potential Media Affect: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), Soil Potential Contaminants of Concern: Diesel, Gasoline Site History: Please refer to recent Site Documents or Monitoring Reports in GeoTracker for site history. Orange County is not responsible for the accuracy of any professional interpretations provided in reports submitted by consultants for the responsible party. Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility Contact: T0605902282 Global Id: T0605902282 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9513202007 Global Id: T0605902282 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Status History: Global Id: T0605902282 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 01/17/2014 Global Id: T0605902282 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 10/31/1997 Global Id: T0605902282 Status: Open - Eligible for Closure Status Date: 01/17/2013 Global Id: T0605902282 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 07/23/2004 Global Id: T0605902282 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 12/01/2002 Global Id: T0605902282 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status Date: 09/29/2003 Global Id: T0605902282 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date: 06/30/2008 S103956009 TC4397232.2s Page 96 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) Regulatory Activities: Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/22/2012 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/21/2013 Action: Notification - Public Notice of Case Closure Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/10/2003 Action: * Verbal Communication Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/05/2007 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: Other Date: 11/13/1997 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/28/2012 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/18/2013 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/21/2013 Action: Notification - Public Notice of Case Closure Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/06/2010 Action: File review Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 12/19/2012 Action: Well Destruction Workplan - Regulator Responded Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 05/03/2013 Action: Other Workplan - Regulator Responded Global Id: T0605902282 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S103956009 TC4397232.2s Page 97 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) S103956009 Action Type: Other Date: 10/31/1997 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/03/2009 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/30/2007 Action: Other Report / Document Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 03/02/2011 Action: File review Global Id: T0605902282 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/17/2014 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 99UT034 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos. 1-D, 2-D, 2-4 Date Closed: 01/17/2014 Case Type: Soil Only Record ID: RO0001922 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 92UT065 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 03/01/2001 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0002512 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 99UT034 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 01/17/2014 Case Type: Soil Only Record ID: RO0001922 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083002060T TC4397232.2s Page 98 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) S103956009 Local Case Num: 92UT065 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: Gasoline Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605901528 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 5/11/1992 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 3/1/2001 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6617893 Longitude: -117.8750459 MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: Not reported MTBE Fuel: 1 MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. MTBE Class: Staff: CAB Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Remediation Plan Case Number: 083003460T TC4397232.2s Page 99 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) S103956009 Local Case Num: 99UT034 Case Type: Soil only Substance: 12034,800661 Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: VER Funding: Not reported How Discovered: UM How Stopped: NPP Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Piping Global ID: T0605902282 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: 12/1/2002 Discover Date: 10/31/1997 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: Not reported Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: 9/29/2003 Date Remediation Plan Submitted: 7/23/2004 Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: _ Soil Qualifies: _ Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6606273 Longitude: -117.8734098 MTBE Date: 10/26/2001 Max MTBE GW: 65 MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: 35 MTBE Fuel: 0 MTBE Tested: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected MTBE Class: Staff: TME Staff Initials: JK Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Hydr Basin #: Not reported Beneficial: MUN Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: Not reported CHMIRS: OES Incident Number: 4-6090 OES notification: 10/27/2014 OES Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 100 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) S103956009 Incident Date: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Property Use: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported Property Management: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Number Of Fatalities: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Vehicle License Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported CA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reported Company Name: Not reported Reporting Officer Name/ID: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Waterway Involved: No Waterway: Not reported Spill Site: Service Station Cleanup By: No Containment: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Type: Not reported Measure: Not reported Other: Not reported Type: PETROLEUM Measure: Gal(s) Other: Not reported Date/Time: 905 Year: 2014 Agency: Chevron Incident Date: 10/27/2014 Admin Agency: Not reported Amount: Not reported Contained: Yes Site Type: Not reported E Date: Not reported Substance: Gasoline Quantity Released: 0.5 Unknown: Not reported Substance #2: Not reported Substance #3: Not reported Evacuations: Not reported Number of Injuries: See above description Number of Fatalities: Not reported #1 Pipeline: No #2 Pipeline: No TC4397232.2s Page 101 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) S103956009 #3 Pipeline: No #1 Vessel — 300 Tons: No #2 Vessel — 300 Tons: No #3 Vessel — 300 Tons: No Evacs: No Injuries: Other Fatals: No Comments: Not reported Description: Per RP, release occurred when auto shut-off Time Completed: failed at a dispenser. Release has been contained Surrounding Area: and clean-up. Lock -out, tag -out was conducted on Estimated Temperature: the dispenser and maintenance was notified. OES Incident Number: 15-2749 OES notification: 05/17/2015 OES Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported Incident Date: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Property Use: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported Property Management: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Number Of Fatalities: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Vehicle License Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported CA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reported Company Name: Not reported Reporting Officer Name/ID: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Waterway Involved: No Waterway: Not reported Spill Site: Service Station Cleanup By: Responsible Party Containment: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Type: Not reported Measure: Not reported Other: Not reported Type: PETROLEUM Measure: Gal(s) Other: Not reported Date/Time: 2030 Year: 2015 TC4397232.2s Page 102 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site 60 NE 1/2-1 0.670 mi. 3538 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 53 ft. CHEVRON #20-2016 (Continued) Agency: Incident Date: Admin Agency: Amount: Contained: Site Type: E Date: Substance: Quantity Released: Unknown: Substance #2: Substance #3: Evacuations: Number of Injuries: Number of Fatalities: #1 Pipeline: #2 Pipeline: #3 Pipeline: #1 Vessel — 300 Tons: #2 Vessel — 300 Tons: #3 Vessel — 300 Tons: Evacs: Injuries: Fatals: Comments: Description: ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT NEWPORT BEACH, CA ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NRC 2015-05-17 00:00:00 Newport Beach Fire Department Not reported Yes Not reported Not reported Gasoline 4 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported No No No No No No No No No Not reported According to NRC#1116786, "Caller stated that a customer was fueling their vehicle and then drove off with the hose still attached. Caller stated the dispenser did not shut off and released 4 gallons of gasoline onto the ground." 80000829 Inactive - Needs Evaluation 07/01/2005 Not reported Military Evaluation FUDS Not reported NO SMBRP SMBRP Not reported Douglas Bautista Cleanup Cypress 74 37 Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED DERA 33.67166 S103956009 ENVIROSTOR S107736963 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 103 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT (Continued) Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: -117.8719 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED CA99799F994900 Federal Facility ID J09CA7127 INPR 80000829 Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: PROJECT WIDE Not reported Inventory Project Report (INPR) 08/18/1998 Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported 61 (CMAFP) SANTA ANA AIRUG WNW 1/2-1 SANTA ANA, CA 0.758 mi. 4001 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 47 ft. ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: 80000028 Inactive - Needs Evaluation 07/01/2005 Not reported Military Evaluation FUDS Not reported NO SMBRP SMBRP Not reported Douglas Bautista Cleanup Cypress 74 37 Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED DERA 33.66861 -117.8916 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S107736963 ENVIROSTOR S107735759 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 104 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site (CMAFP) SANTA ANA AIRUG (Continued) APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: CA99799F693800 Alias Type: Federal Facility ID Alias Name: J09CA0042 Alias Type: INPR Alias Name: 80000028 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported 62 COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD NW S OF PRESIDIO DR & WEST OF NEWPORT BLVD 1/2-1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.803 mi. 4241 ft. Relative: AWP Higher AWP Facility ID: Region Code: Actual: Region: 46 ft. SMBR Branch Code: SMBR Branch Unit: Site Name.: Current Status Date: Current Status: Lead Agency Code: Lead Agency: Facility Type: Awp Site Type: NPL: Tier Of AWP Site: Source Of Funding: Responsible Staff Member: Supervisor Responsible: SIC Code: Facility SIC: RWQCB Code: RWQCB Associated With Site: Site Access Controlled: 30970004 3 GLENDALE SO OMF-SOUTHERN CALIF Not reported 01011995 ANNUAL WORKPLAN - ACTIVE SITE DTSC DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL Open military facility OPEN MILITARY BASE Not Listed Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 97 NATIONAL SECURITY/INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number RESPONSE ENVIROSTOR HIST Cal -Sites Cortese S107735759 S101481491 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 105 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD (Continued) S101481491 Site Listed HWS List: Not reported Hazard Ranking Score: Not reported Date Site Hazard Ranked: Not reported Groundwater Contamination: Not reported # Of Contamination Sources: 0 Lat/Long: Not reported Lat/Long (dms): 000/000 Lat/long Method: Not reported Description Of Entity: Not reported State Assembly Distt Code: 68 State Senate District: 35 RESPONSE: Facility ID: 30970004 Site Type: State Response Site Type Detail: Open Base Acres: 8.5 National Priorities List: NO Cleanup Oversight Agencies: DTSC Lead Agency Description: * DTSC Project Manager: Isaac Hirbawi Supervisor: Manny Alonzo Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Site Code: 400498 Site Mgmt. Req.: NONE SPECIFIED Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program Status: DSMOA Status: Active Status Date: 06/28/2011 Restricted Use: NO Funding: DERA Latitude: 33.67166 Longitude: -117.8888 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: BATTERY STORAGE, FUEL - VEHICLE STORAGE/ REFUELING, MAINTENANCE / CLEANING, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Potential COC: Arsenic Tetrachloroethylene (PCE Trichloroethylene (TCE Chloroform Cobalt Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs Selenium Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: OTH, SOIL, SV Alias Name: SANTA ANA ARMY BASE (1940S & 50S) Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias Name: T0605959838 Alias Type: GeoTracker Global ID Alias Name: 400498 Alias Type: Project Code (Site Code) Alias Name: 30970004 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Environmental Baseline Survey Completed Date: 12/16/2002 Comments: BWEBS - SITE 1: In June 2002, the Phase II EBS was submitted presenting the results of the soil and groundwater field TC4397232.2s Page 106 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD (Continued) S101481491 investigations. A total of nine areas of concern (AOCs) were identified where potential risks to human health and the environment may exist. These include a battery room floor drain, motor vehicle lift area, fuel storage area, grease rack, oil and water sparator, diesel refueller spill, groundwater sampling, lead-based paint sampling, and hydraulic fluid spill area. Contaminants detected include petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and lead-based paint. Also, the extent of contamination was not determined. DTSC submitted comments on August 26, 2002 not concurring with the No Further Action recommendations by the Air Force, and requested additional sampling to be conducted to determine the extent of contamination. The Air Force responded with a final letter on October 8, 2002 finalizing the EBS report and deferring any future actions until a relocation date for the CMANG is known. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 08/08/1991 Comments: Letter sent to Air National Guard (ANG) stating no concurr- ance with nfa recommendation & explaining pea process and funding option for DTSC oversight. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Inventory Project Report (INPR) Completed Date: 03/04/1993 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection Report (PA/SI) Completed Date: 08/25/2012 Comments: Final work plan was submitted in August 2012 and field activities are scheduled for September 2012. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection Report (PA/SI) Completed Date: 05/29/2013 Comments: Draft Final Addendum to the Work Plan for the SSI completed. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Supplemental Site Investigation Tech Memo Completed Date: 01/08/2014 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Supplemental Site Investigation Tech Memo Completed Date: 04/08/2014 Comments: DTSC submitted comments on the Draft Final SSI report in March 2014. A project meeting was held on March 25, 2014 between DTSC and the AF/ANG to discuss the proposed schedule for the site remediation. The AF/ANG agreed to address the remaining data gaps in the Remedial Investigation Phase. TC4397232.2s Page 107 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD (Continued) Completed Area Name: Completed Sub Area Name: Completed Document Type: Completed Date: Comments: Future Area Name: Future Sub Area Name: Future Document Type: Future Due Date: Future Area Name: Future Sub Area Name: Future Document Type: Future Due Date: Future Area Name: Future Sub Area Name: Future Document Type: Future Due Date: Future Area Name: Future Sub Area Name: Future Document Type: Future Due Date: Future Area Name: Future Sub Area Name: Future Document Type: Future Due Date: Future Area Name: Future Sub Area Name: Future Document Type: Future Due Date: Future Area Name: Future Sub Area Name: Future Document Type: Future Due Date: Schedule Area Name: Schedule Sub Area Name: Schedule Document Type: Schedule Due Date: Schedule Revised Date: PROJECT WIDE Not reported * Discovery 07/24/1991 Not reported PROJECT WIDE Not reported Certification 2019 PROJECT WIDE Not reported Public Notice 2017 PROJECT WIDE Not reported Remedial Action Completion Report 2018 PROJECT WIDE Not reported Feasibility Study Report 2017 PROJECT WIDE Not reported Fact Sheets 2017 PROJECT WIDE Not reported Remedial Action Plan 2017 PROJECT WIDE Not reported Remedial Investigation Report 2016 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: 30970004 Status: Active Status Date: 06/28/2011 Site Code: 400498 Site Type: State Response Site Type Detailed: Open Base Acres: 8.5 NPL: NO Regulatory Agencies: DTSC Lead Agency: DTSC Program Manager: Isaac Hirbawi Supervisor: Manny Alonzo Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program: DSMOA EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101481491 TC4397232.2s Page 108 Map ID PROJECT WIDE MAP FINDINGS Not reported Direction Environmental Baseline Survey Completed Date: 12/16/2002 Comments: Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number identified where potential risks to human health and the environment may exist. These include a battery room floor drain, motor vehicle COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD (Continued) S101481491 Restricted Use: NO sampling, and hydraulic fluid spill area. Contaminants detected Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: DERA determined. DTSC submitted comments on August 26, 2002 not concurring Latitude: 33.67166 Longitude: -117.8888 of contamination. The Air Force responded with a final letter on APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: BATTERY STORAGE, FUEL - VEHICLE STORAGE/ REFUELING, MAINTENANCE / CLEANING, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Potential COC: Arsenic Tetrachloroethylene (PCE Trichloroethylene (TCE Chloroform Cobalt Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs Selenium Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: OTH, SOIL, SV Alias Name: SANTA ANA ARMY BASE (1940S & 50S) Alias Type: Alternate Name Alias Name: T0605959838 Alias Type: GeoTracker Global ID Alias Name: 400498 Alias Type: Project Code (Site Code) Alias Name: 30970004 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Environmental Baseline Survey Completed Date: 12/16/2002 Comments: BWEBS - SITE 1: In June 2002, the Phase II EBS was submitted presenting the results of the soil and groundwater field investigations. A total of nine areas of concern (ADCs) were identified where potential risks to human health and the environment may exist. These include a battery room floor drain, motor vehicle lift area, fuel storage area, grease rack, oil and water sparator, diesel refueller spill, groundwater sampling, lead-based paint sampling, and hydraulic fluid spill area. Contaminants detected include petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and lead-based paint. Also, the extent of contamination was not determined. DTSC submitted comments on August 26, 2002 not concurring with the No Further Action recommendations by the Air Force, and requested additional sampling to be conducted to determine the extent of contamination. The Air Force responded with a final letter on October 8, 2002 finalizing the EBS report and deferring any future actions until a relocation date for the CMANG is known. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 08/08/1991 Comments: Letter sent to Air National Guard (ANG) stating no concurr- ance with nfa recommendation & explaining pea process and funding option for DTSC oversight. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Inventory Project Report (INPR) Completed Date: 03/04/1993 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE TC4397232.2s Page 109 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD (Continued) Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection Report (PA/SI) Completed Date: 08/25/2012 Comments: Final work plan was submitted in August 2012 and field activities are PROJECT WIDE scheduled for September 2012. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection Report (PA/SI) Completed Date: 05/29/2013 Comments: Draft Final Addendum to the Work Plan for the SSI completed. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Supplemental Site Investigation Tech Memo Completed Date: 01/08/2014 Comments: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Supplemental Site Investigation Tech Memo Completed Date: 04/08/2014 Comments: DTSC submitted comments on the Draft Final SSI report in March 2014. PROJECT WIDE A project meeting was held on March 25, 2014 between DTSC and the Not reported AF/ANG to discuss the proposed schedule for the site remediation. The Remedial Action Plan AF/ANG agreed to address the remaining data gaps in the Remedial Investigation Phase. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: ' Discovery Completed Date: 07/24/1991 Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Certification Future Due Date: 2019 Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Public Notice Future Due Date: 2017 Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Remedial Action Completion Report Future Due Date: 2018 Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Feasibility Study Report Future Due Date: 2017 Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Fact Sheets Future Due Date: 2017 Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Remedial Action Plan S101481491 TC4397232.2s Page 110 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD (Continued) S101481491 Future Due Date: 2017 Future Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Remedial Investigation Report Future Due Date: 2016 Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Calsite: Region: GLENDALE Facility ID: 30970004 Facility Type: OPEN Type: OPEN MILITARY BASE Branch: SO Branch Name: OMF-SOUTHERN CALIF File Name: Not reported State Senate District: 01011995 Status: ANNUAL WORKPLAN (AWP) - ACTIVE SITE Status Name: ANNUAL WORKPLAN - ACTIVE SITE Lead Agency: DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL NPL: Not Listed SIC Code: 97 SIC Name: NATIONAL SECURITY/INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Access: Not reported Cortese: Not reported Hazardous Ranking Score: Not reported Date Site Hazard Ranked: Not reported Groundwater Contamination: Not reported Staff Member Responsible for Site: Not reported Supervisor Responsible for Site: Not reported Region Water Control Board: Not reported Region Water Control Board Name: Not reported Lat/Long Direction: Not reported Lat/Long (dms): 000/000 Lat/long Method: Not reported Lat/Long Description: Not reported State Assembly District Code: 68 State Senate District Code: 35 Facility ID: 30970004 Activity: BWEBS Activity Name: BASEWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE SURVEY AWP Code: SITE1 Proposed Budget: 0 AWP Completion Date: 12162002 Revised Due Date: Not reported Comments Date: 12162002 Est Person -Yrs to complete: 0 Estimated Size: Not reported Request to Delete Activity: Not reported Activity Status: AWP Definition of Status: ANNUAL WORKPLAN - ACTIVE SITE Liquids Removed (Gals): 0 Liquids Treated (Gals): 0 Action Included Capping: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 111 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD (Continued) Well Decommissioned: Not reported Action Included Fencing: Not reported Removal Action Certification: Not reported Activity Comments: Not reported For Commercial Reuse: 0 For Industrial Reuse: 0 For Residential Reuse: 0 Unknown Type: 0 Facility ID: 30970004 Activity: SS Activity Name: SITE SCREENING AWP Code: Not reported Proposed Budget: 0 AWP Completion Date: 08081991 Revised Due Date: Not reported Comments Date: 08081991 Est Person -Yrs to complete: 0 Estimated Size: Not reported Request to Delete Activity: Not reported Activity Status: AWP Definition of Status: ANNUAL WORKPLAN - ACTIVE SITE Liquids Removed (Gals): 0 Liquids Treated (Gals): 0 Action Included Capping: Not reported Well Decommissioned: Not reported Action Included Fencing: Not reported Removal Action Certification: Not reported Activity Comments: Not reported For Commercial Reuse: 0 For Industrial Reuse: 0 For Residential Reuse: 0 Unknown Type: 0 Alternate Address: S OF PRESIDIO DR & WEST OF NEWPORT BLVD Alternate City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Background Info: The Costa Mesa ANG station is an 8.5 acre facility that has been active since 1964. The facility is located on former Santa Ana A rmy Air Base property. Activities include routine maintenance of vehicles, generators, and various ground equipment. Hazardous w astes resulting from these activities include varying amounts of waste fuels, oils, paints, thinners, and solvents. A preliminary assessment was submitted in December 1990 where a recommendation for NFA was concluded. Comments Date: 08081991 Comments: Letter sent to Air National Guard (ANG) stating no concurr- ance Comments Date: 08081991 Comments: with nfa recommendation & explaining pea process and funding opti Comments Date: 08081991 Comments: on for DTSC oversight. Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: BWEBS - SITE 1: In June 2002, the Phase II EBS was submitted pres Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: enting the results of the soil and groundwater field investigatio Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: ns. A total of nine areas of concern (ADCs) were identified wher Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: e potential risks to human health and the environment may exist. Comments Date: 12162002 S101481491 TC4397232.2s Page 112 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD (Continued) S101481491 Comments: These include a battery room floor drain, motor vehicle lift are Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: a, fuel storage area, grease rack, oil and water sparator, diesel Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: refueller spill, groundwater sampling, lead-based paint sampling Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: , and hydraulic fluid spill area. Contaminants detected include p Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: etroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and lead-based Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: paint. Also, the extent of contamination was not determined. D Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: TSC submitted comments on August 26, 2002 not concurring with the Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: No Further Action recommendations by the Air Force, and requeste Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: d additional sampling to be conducted to determine the extent of Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: contamination. The Air Force responded with a final letter on Oc Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: tober 8, 2002 finalizing the EBS report and deferring any future Comments Date: 12162002 Comments: actions until a relocation date for the CMANG is known. ID Name: Not reported ID Value: Not reported Alternate Name: SANTA ANA ARMY BASE (1940S & 50S)COSTA MESA AIR NATIONAL GUARD Special Programs Code: DSMOA Special Programs Name: DEFENSE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CORTESE: Region: CORTESE Envirostor Id: 30970004 Site/Facility Type: STATE RESPONSE Cleanup Status: ACTIVE Status Date: 06/28/2011 Site Code: 400498 Latitude: 33.671666 Longitude: -117.88888 Owner: Not reported Enf Type: Not reported Swat R: Not reported Flag: envirostor Order No: Not reported Waste Discharge System No: Not reported Effective Date: Not reported Region 2: Not reported WID Id: Not reported Solid Waste Id No: Not reported Waste Management Uit Name: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 113 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 63 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT FUELSTORAGE Date Reported: ENE 19801 AIRPORT WAY SOUTH Not reported 1/2-1 SANTA ANA, CA 90603 Facility Type: 0.929 mi. Discharge Date: Not reported 4903 ft. 90603 Relative: EMI: Status Date: Higher Year: 1990 Site Type: County Code: 30 Actual: Air Basin: SC 49 ft. Facility ID: 63657 Air District Name: SC Program Manager: SIC Code: 8249 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Assembly: Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Restricted Use: Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 1 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1 Latitude: Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 5 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0 NOTIFY 65: EXOTIC MATERIAL INC Date Reported: Not reported Staff Initials: Not reported Board File Number: Not reported Facility Type: Not reported Discharge Date: Not reported Incident Description: 90603 64 EXOTIC MATERIAL INC NNW 2930 BRISTOL ST 1/2-1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.984 mi. 5193 ft. Relative: ENVIROSTOR: Higher Facility ID: Status: Actual: Status Date: 40 ft. Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: 30280530 Refer: Other Agency 08/23/1984 Not reported Historical * Historical Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported * Mmonroy Cleanup Cypress 74 37 * RCRA 3012 - Past Haz Waste Disp Inven Site NO NONE SPECIFIED Not reported 33.67743 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number EMI S100178912 Notify 65 N/A ENVIROSTOR S100200509 N/A TC4397232.2s Page 114 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site EXOTIC MATERIAL INC (Continued) Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S100200509 -117.8858 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED " UNSPECIFIED ACID SOLUTION' UNSPECIFIED OIL CONTAINING WASTE' UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY (SEAL BEACH) Alternate Name PERKIN-ELMER CORP Alternate Name CAD008339988 EPA Identification Number 110002632802 EPA (FRS #) 30280530 Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Not reported Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: ' Discovery Completed Date: 10/12/1983 Comments: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ID FROM ERRIS Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Site Screening Completed Date: 10/25/1994 Comments: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC. Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report Completed Date: 08/23/1984 Comments: FACILITY DRIVE-BY OLD LOCATION: BLDG VACANT. WAREHOUSE W/ OFFICE IN FRONT. NO VISIBLE PROB. CURR LOC: DRUMS STACKD AROUND SMALL METAL STORAGE. NO VISIBLE PROB. CLEAN SUBMIT TO EPA PRELIM ASSESS DONE RCRA 3012 Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported TC4397232.2s Page 115 Count: 9 records. City EDR ID Site Name ORPHAN SUMMARY Site Address Zip Database(s) COSTA MESA S114587027 BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON 300 BRISTOL ST SE RGA LUST COSTA MESA S117696209 BRISTOL STREET BRISTOL STREET NPDES COSTA MESA S114587030 BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON 300 BRISTOL RGA LUST COSTA MESA 5114587029 BRISTOL PLAZA CHEVRON 300 BRISTOL STREET, SOUTHEAST RGA LUST COSTA MESA S113127636 BRISTOL PETROLEUM 300 N BRISTOL 92626 HAZNET COSTA MESA S117698152 COSTA MESA FWY 19TH TO BRISTOL COSTA MESA FWY 19TH TO BRISTOL NPDES NEWPORT BEACH 5113029279 NORTH BRISTOL CLEANERS 1000 N BRISTOL AVE 92660 HAZNET SANTA ANA S102361516 SANTA ANA VALLEY IRRIGATION DUMP # E BANK OF SANTA ANA RIVER, S O SWF/LF SANTA ANA S108985898 BRISTOL PLAZA CALIF CLEANERS BRISTOL STREET SLIC TC4397232.2s Page 116 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 75 NPL Site Boundaries Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 EPA Region 5 Telephone 312-886-6686 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4246 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4397232.2s Page GR -1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 75 Federal CERCLIS list Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC4397232.2s Page GR -2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Federal RCRA generators list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4397232.2s Page GR -3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Federal ERNS list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Telephone: 202-267-2180 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4397232.2s Page GR -4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program's (SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly -contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2015 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2015 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2015 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2015 Telephone: 916-341-6320 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 16 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Telephone: 909-782-4496 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Telephone: 805-542-4786 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Telephone: 760-776-8943 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4397232.2s Page GR -5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Telephone: 760-241-7365 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Telephone: 530-542-5572 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, EI Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Telephone: 916-464-4834 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Telephone: 858-637-5595 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Telephone: 510-622-2433 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Telephone: 707-570-3769 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4397232.2s Page GR -6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST: Geotracker's Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. For more information on a particular leaking underground storage tank sites, please contact the appropriate regulatory agency. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Telephone: 213-576-6710 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 01/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska TC4397232.2s Page GR -7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 03/17/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Telephone: 707-576-2220 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4397232.2s Page GR -8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Telephone: 805-549-3147 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Telephone: 213-576-6600 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Telephone: 916-464-3291 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 16 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Telephone: 619-241-6583 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Telephone: 530-542-5574 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Telephone: 760-346-7491 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4397232.2s Page GR -9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Telephone: 951-782-3298 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 11 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Telephone: 858-467-2980 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 07/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 06/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2009 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2009 Telephone: 916-327-5092 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 03/17/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC4397232.2s Page GR -10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12/14/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/06/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC4397232.2s Page GR -11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 48 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC's costs. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 State and tribal Brownfields sites Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 06/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. TC4397232.2s Page GR -12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 47 HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4397232.2s Page GR -13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department') provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL -SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4397232.2s Page GR -14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990's. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 09/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. TC4397232.2s Page GR -15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Local Land Records Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 06/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 35 Records of Emergency Release Reports Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). TC4397232.2s Page GR -16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing The State Water Resources Control Board and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards partner with the Department of Defense (DoD) through the Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement (DSMOA) to oversee the investigation and remediation of water quality issues at military facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Other Ascertainable Records Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4397232.2s Page GR -17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4397232.2s Page GR -18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 110 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 RMP: Risk Management Plans Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4397232.2s Page GR -19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4397232.2s Page GR -20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. TC4397232.2s Page GR -21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Telephone: 202-366-4595 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2015 Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Telephone: Varies Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 46 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC4397232.2s Page GR -22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931 and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4397232.2s Page GR -23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2014 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/31/2014 Telephone: 303-231-5959 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C -DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 01/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal -Sites). TC4397232.2s Page GR -24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/24/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner's agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2015 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2015 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2015 Telephone: 916-341-6066 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. TC4397232.2s Page GR -25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Telephone: 916-255-1136 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2014 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2015 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/28/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 07/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 05/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. TC4397232.2s Page GR -26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 34 PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 10/21/1993 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/1993 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/1993 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 06/19/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical -laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water board?s review found that more than one-third of the region?s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 04/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. TC4397232.2s Page GR -27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Telephone: 916-341-5227 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Telephone: 213-576-6726 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. TC4397232.2s Page GR -28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 182 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 07/21/2015 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2015 Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/05/2015 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 07/21/2015 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2015 Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually AMADOR COUNTY: TC4397232.2s Page GR -29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 06/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/20/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 44 CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 07/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 17 COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 24 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 DEL NORTE COUNTY: Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC4397232.2s Page GR -30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 05/19/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 FRESNO COUNTY: Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: EI Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA's are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 07/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 20 HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/11/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 INYO COUNTY: Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4397232.2s Page GR -31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2013 Number of Days to Update: 33 KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/18/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 34 KINGS COUNTY: Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county's Certified Unified Program Agency database. California's Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 18 LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY: Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4397232.2s Page GR -32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/04/2015 Number of Days to Update: 33 List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 07/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 01/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of EI Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in EI Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: City of EI Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 06/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC4397232.2s Page GR -33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county's Certified Unified Program Agency database. California's Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 17 1LVA /9C710Well] 01001 Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 10/08/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2014 Number of Days to Update: 54 MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 MONO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 06/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 33 MONTEREY COUNTY: Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-499-6647 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 NAPA COUNTY: Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4397232.2s Page GR -34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2011 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2011 Telephone: 707-253-4269 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/15/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2008 Number of Days to Update: 23 NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 06/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 48 ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non -petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 30 PLACER COUNTY: Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4397232.2s Page GR -35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2015 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2015 Telephone: 530-745-2363 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/05/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 07/15/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015 Telephone: 951-358-5055 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 07/15/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015 Telephone: 951-358-5055 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean -Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 05/07/2015 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2015 Telephone: 916-875-8406 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 05/07/2015 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2015 Telephone: 916-875-8406 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. TC4397232.2s Page GR -36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment 'H' permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non -tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 09/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2013 Number of Days to Update: 23 Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2014 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Telephone: 415-252-3920 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 5 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4397232.2s Page GR -37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Government Version: 05/22/2015 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Telephone: 805-781-5596 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/10/2015 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2015 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2015 Telephone: 650-363-1921 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 06/10/2015 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2015 Telephone: 650-363-1921 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/29/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Telephone: 805-686-8167 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list TC4397232.2s Page GR -38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 05/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/12/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 24 SOLANO COUNTY: Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4397232.2s Page GR -39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2015 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2015 Telephone: 707-784-6770 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 06/22/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 SUTTER COUNTY: Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 07/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 VENTURA COUNTY: Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4397232.2s Page GR -40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 06/26/2015 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2015 Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2015 Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2015 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2015 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 05/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 YOLO COUNTY: Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 07/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 IYl1:f-1101611101va Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4397232.2s Page GR -41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2015 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2015 Telephone: 530-749-7523 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2015 Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Telephone: 860-424-3375 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2015 Telephone: 518-402-8651 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2015 Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2015 Telephone: 717-783-8990 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Telephone: 401-222-2797 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4397232.2s Page GR -42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Telephone: 281-546-1505 Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation Telephone: 800-823-6277 This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. TC4397232.2s Page GR -43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4397232.2s Page GR -44 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS BRISTOL AUTOPLEX 375 BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Version Date: Northeast Map Version Date: 33.6643 - 33° 39' 51.48" 117.8795 - 117° 52' 46.20" Zone 11 418458.9 3725088.8 27 ft. above sea level 5640950 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 2012 5640942 TUSTIN, CA 2012 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC4397232.2s Page A-1 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General SW SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES W W W V N V Oo O1 v N � O Ni A . - . - . - . - . - . _ . _ . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . .a a . TP z C 0 O N Of r N N W W N J W J N W• — • — • — • — • — V — • — • — • — • — • — • — • — • — • — • — • — • West I East TP 1/2 1 Miles Target Property Elevation: 27 ft. Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC4397232.2s Page A-2 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Target Property County ORANGE, CA Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Property COSTA MESA HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 06059C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data Not Reported NWI Electronic Data Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Site -Specific Hydrogeological Data*: Search Radius: 1.25 miles Location Relative to TP: 1/2 - 1 Mile North Site Name: Western Digital Corporation Site EPA ID Number: CAD051983567 Surficial Aquifer Flow Dir.: South Measured Depth to Water: 35.5 feet. Hydraulic Connection: Aquifers underlying the site are hydraulically connected. Sole Source Aquifer: No information about a sole source aquifer is available Data Quality: Information based on site-specific subsurface investigations is documented in the CERCLIS investigation report(s) AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW 2 1/8 - 1/4 Mile NW SE 4 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESE Not Reported ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. TC4397232.2s Page A-3 MAP ID 5 6 7 9 12 14 15 16 17 GEOCHECK9' - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY LOCATION FROM TP 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile North 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile North 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile North GENERAL DIRECTION GROUNDWATER FLOW SSE S W E Not Reported SSW WNW WSW NNE For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. TC4397232.2s Page A-4 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. :AZa :F� 1:L1111 0:L1011411 ki 1 I I GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratifed Sequence System: Quaternary Series: Quaternary Code: Q (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). TC4397232.2s Page A-5 SSURGO SOIL MAP - 4397232.2s Target Property SSURGO Soil Water 0 VIb I/i 14N111" SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4397232.2s LAT/LONG: 33.6643/117.8795 DATE: August 28, 2015 7:35 pm Copyright m 2015 EDR, Inc. (c) 2010 Tele Atlas Rel. 07/2009. GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: THAPTO-HISTIC FLUVAQUENTS Soil Surface Texture: mucky clay Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Hydric Status: All hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 84 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 9 inches mucky clay Not reported Not reported Max: 1.4 Max: 8.4 Min: 0.42 Min: 7.9 2 9 inches 20 inches mucky silty Not reported Not reported Max: 1.4 Max: 6 Min: clay Min: 0.42 5.1 3 20 inches 55 inches muck Not reported Not reported Max: 42 Max: 6.5 Min: 0.42 Min: 5.1 4 55 inches 68 inches silty clay loam Not reported Not reported Max: 1.4 Max: 6.5 Min: 0.42 Min: 6.1 Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture: Hydrologic Group: Soil Drainage Class: XERALFIC ARENTS variable Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Well drained TC4397232.2s Page A-7 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Not Reported Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 59 inches variable Not reported Not reported Max: Max: Min: materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 5.1 Soil Map ID: 3 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture: Hydrologic Group: Soil Drainage Class: Hydric Status: Not hydric MYFORD sandy loam Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Moderately well drained Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches sandy loam Granular FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 14 5.1 pct. or less Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty, or 50%), Lean Clay. Clayey Gravel FINE-GRAINED and Sand. SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. TC4397232.2s Page A-8 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information MYFORD Boundary sandy loam Classification Saturated water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 2 11 inches 18 inches sandy clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.42 Max: 8.4 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 5.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 3 18 inches 27 inches sandy clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.42 Max: 8.4 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 5.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 4 27 inches 70 inches sandy clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.42 Max: 8.4 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 6.1 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 5 70 inches 79 inches sandy loam Granular FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 6.1 pct. or less Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty, or 50%), Lean Clay. Clayey Gravel FINE-GRAINED and Sand. SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. Soil Map ID: 4 Soil Component Name: MYFORD Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4397232.2s Page A-9 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 22 inches sandy loam Not reported Not reported Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 14 5.1 2 22 inches 27 inches sandy clay Not reported Not reported Max: 0.42 Max: 8.4 passing No. limit less than Min: 0.01 Min: 5.6 3 27 inches 38 inches sandy clay loam Not reported Not reported Max: 0.42 Max: 8.4 Clayey Gravel FINE-GRAINED Min: 0.01 Min: 5.6 4 38 inches 70 inches sandy loam Not reported Not reported Max: 0.42 Max: 8.4 Clays (liquid Min: 0.01 Min: 6.1 5 70 inches 79 inches sandy loam Not reported Not reported Max: 14 Max: 6.5 50%), silt. Min:4 Min: 6.1 Soil Map ID: 5 Soil Component Name: MYFORD Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches sandy loam Granular FINE-GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6 Min: materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 14 5.1 pct. or less Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty, or 50%), Lean Clay. Clayey Gravel FINE-GRAINED and Sand. SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. TC4397232.2s Page A-10 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Water Boundary sandy loam Classification Saturated water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Hydric Status: Not hydric hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 2 11 inches 18 inches sandy clay Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.42 Max: 8.4 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 5.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 3 18 inches 27 inches sandy clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.42 Max: 8.4 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 5.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 4 27 inches 70 inches sandy clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.42 Max: 8.4 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 6.1 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 5 70 inches 79 inches sandy loam Granular FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 6.1 pct. or less Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty, or 50%), Lean Clay. Clayey Gravel FINE-GRAINED and Sand. SOILS, Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50%), silt. Soil Map ID: 6 Soil Component Name: Water Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Not Reported Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches No Layer Information available. TC4397232.2s Page A-11 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile State Database 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 3 USGS40000136499 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NW A8 USGS40000136517 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW 13 USGS40000136358 1/2 -1 Mile SSW FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 1 CADW60000022117 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SSE 10 CADW60000022116 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW A11 CADW60000000221 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW TC4397232.2s Page A-12 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 4397232.2s N County Boundary CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies 0 114 112 1 M lies N Major Roads Costa Mesa CA 92626 N Contour Lines Groundwater Flow Direction Earthquake Fault Lines ffD Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location bC Airports c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater H D Closest Hydrogeological Data ® Water Wells • Oil, gas or related wells © Public Water Supply Wells ® Cluster of Multiple Icons SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4397232.2s LAT/LONG: 33.6643/117.8795 DATE: August 28, 2015 7:35 pm Copyright cg 2015 EDR, Inc. cc, 2010 Tale Atlas Rel. 07/2009. GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 1 Site ID: SSE NW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SE Higher Shallow Water Depth: Objectid: 22117 Latitude: 33.6621 Longitude: -117.8781 Site code: 336621 N1 178781WO01 State well numbe: 06S10W12L001 S Local well name: " Well use id: 6 Well use descrip: Unknown County id: 30 County name: Orange Basin code: '8-1' Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County Dwr region id: 80238 Dwr region: Southern Region Office Site id: CADW60000022117 2 Site ID: 083000343T NW Groundwater Flow: SE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 33.29 Higher Well Deep Water Depth: 35.11 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Drainagearea value: Date: 05/20/1987 3 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher Org. Identifier: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Huc code: Drainagearea Units: Contrib drainagearea units Longitude: Horiz Acc measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: Database EDR ID Number CA WELLS CADW60000022117 AQUIFLOW 65355 FED USGS USGS-CA USGS California Water Science Center USGS-334004117525601 006S010W12EO03S Well Not Reported 18070204 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Not Reported Latitude: 33.6677978 -117.8831123 Sourcemap scale: Not Reported Unknown Horiz Acc measure units: Unknown Interpolated from map NAD83 Vert measure val: Not Reported Not Reported Vertacc measure val: Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Countrycode: US California Coastal Basin aquifers Not Reported USGS40000136499 TC4397232.2s Page A-14 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Site ID: Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 4 Site ID: 083002060T ESE Groundwater Flow: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 38903 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Shallow Water Depth: Higher 27 Deep Water Depth: 32 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 06/30/1998 5 Site ID: 083002744T SE Groundwater Flow: SSE AQUIFLOW 52081 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 29.07 Higher Org.Identifier: Deep Water Depth: 31.64 Formal name: Average Water Depth: Not Reported USGS-334008117532201 Date: 02/24/1997 6 Site ID: 083000468T North Groundwater Flow: S AQUIFLOW 34270 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 6.81 Higher Deep Water Depth: 9.35 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 04/24/1997 7 Site ID: 083001459T ENE Groundwater Flow: W AQUIFLOW 34293 1/2 -11 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 22 Higher Org.Identifier: Deep Water Depth: 24 Formal name: Average Water Depth: Not Reported USGS-334008117532201 Date: 12/21/1998 A8 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-CA Formal name: USGS California Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-334008117532201 Monloc name: 006S010W11 G001 S Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 18070204 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -117.8903347 Sourcemap scale: FED USGS USGS40000136517 Not Reported Not Reported 33.6689088 24000 TC4397232.2s Page A-15 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 21.9 Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 54.00 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Not Reported 2.5 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: California Coastal Basin aquifers Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19290201 Welldepth: 407 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 725 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 58 Feet below Feet to Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- 1986-08-13 68.64 ------------------------------------------------- 1986-04-29 64.95 1986-02-11 62.06 1985-11-04 64.96 1985-08-07 68.24 1985-05-08 50.40 1985-02-15 52.44 1984-10-25 64.41 1984-08-14 59.72 1984-05-10 52.13 1984-02-03 47.99 1983-11-01 58.21 1983-08-10 64.09 1983-05-12 54.53 1983-02-09 55.39 1982-11-03 61.34 1982-08-02 60.46 1982-04-29 52.84 1982-01-26 53.86 1981-11-09 57.53 1981-07-30 54.10 1981-05-07 51.37 1981-02-04 50.12 1980-10-30 59.10 1980-08-26 61.23 1980-06-17 57.14 1980-02-06 56.86 1979-11-08 62.43 1979-08-01 67.88 1979-04-30 54.59 1979-02-05 59.78 1978-10-25 68.0 1978-09-29 69.13 1974-05-06 57.0 1974-03-21 49.8 1974-01-30 59.1 1973-11-05 58.8 1973-09-13 61.2 1973-07-16 63.1 1973-05-11 56.1 1973-03-13 53.1 1973-01-11 58.1 1972-11-06 60.4 1972-05-05 57.6 1972-03-03 52.8 1972-01-13 46.4 1971-03-08 44.9 1970-12-16 44.7 1970-11-05 51.7 1970-10-08 52.2 1970-09-11 52.8 1970-08-12 52.4 1970-07-09 47.0 1970-06-04 45.5 1970-05-05 44.7 1970-04-30 43.0 1970-03-12 42.5 1970-02-16 42.2 9 Site ID: 083000403T ENE Groundwater Flow: E AQUIFLOW 66483 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 21.9 Higher Deep Water Depth: 24.2 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 12/1997 TC4397232.2s Page A-16 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 10 Site ID: WNW NNW 1/2 -1 Mile Not Reported AQUIFLOW 38855 Higher Shallow Water Depth: Objectid: 22116 Latitude: 33.6674 Longitude: -117.8918 Site code: 336674N 1 178918WO01 State well numbe: 06S10W11 G003S Local well name: " Well use id: 6 Well use descrip: Unknown County id: 30 County name: Orange Basin code: '8-1' Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County Dwr region id: 80238 Dwr region: Southern Region Office Site id: CADW60000022116 A11 Site ID: WNW NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Not Reported AQUIFLOW 38855 Higher Shallow Water Depth: Objectid: 221 Latitude: 33.6689 Longitude: -117.8912 Site code: 336689N 1 178912WO01 State well n umbe: 06S 10W 11 G001 S Local well name: " Well use id: 6 Well use descrip: Unknown County id: 30 County name: Orange Basin code: '8-1' Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County Dwr region id: 80238 Dwr region: Southern Region Office Site id: CADW60000000221 Database EDR ID Number CA WELLS CADW60000022116 CA WELLS CADW60000000221 12 Site ID: 083002072T NNW Groundwater Flow: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 38855 1/2 -1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 25 Higher Deep Water Depth: 26 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 03/31/1998 13 SSW FED USGS USGS40000136358 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower TC4397232.2s Page A-17 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Org.Identifier: USGS-CA Formal name: USGS California Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-333909117525801 Monloc name: 006S010W13EO01S Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 18070204 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 33.6525205 Longitude: -117.8836679 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 11.40 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: .10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Level or other surveying method Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: California Coastal Basin aquifers Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19650915 Welldepth: 35 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 200 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 83 Feet below Feet to Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- 1986-08-13 10.65 ------------------------------------------------- 1986-04-29 9.89 1986-02-11 10.02 1985-11-04 10.80 1985-08-07 9.63 1985-05-08 8.75 1985-02-15 9.00 1984-10-25 9.42 1984-09-05 8.91 1984-05-10 8.40 1984-02-03 8.35 1983-11-01 9.39 1983-08-10 8.96 1983-05-11 8.47 1983-02-09 9.01 1982-11-03 9.54 1982-07-29 9.10 1982-04-29 8.38 1982-01-26 8.85 1981-11-09 9.39 1981-07-30 8.61 1981-05-07 8.34 1981-02-04 8.67 1980-10-29 9.26 1980-08-26 9.17 1980-06-10 8.85 1980-02-06 9.50 1979-11-05 10.10 1979-08-01 9.95 1979-04-30 9.46 1979-02-05 9.88 1978-10-25 10.73 1978-09-29 10.76 1977-10-26 11.06 1977-01-12 10.55 1976-10-29 10.55 1976-05-11 9.85 1976-01-12 8.75 1975-05-05 9.15 1975-03-14 9.15 1975-01-09 9.35 1974-10-23 10.05 1974-09-06 9.85 1974-07-09 9.55 1974-05-06 9.15 1974-03-21 9.45 1974-01-31 9.35 1973-11-05 9.95 1973-09-13 9.75 1973-07-10 9.35 1973-05-11 9.05 1973-03-13 8.96 1973-01-11 9.55 1972-11-06 9.75 1972-09-08 9.55 1972-07-12 9.15 1972-05-05 8.85 1972-03-13 8.68 1972-01-13 8.75 1971-11-08 8.65 1971-09-02 8.55 1971-07-16 8.05 TC4397232.2s Page A-18 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Ground -water levels, continued. Site ID: Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- 1971-06-17 8.25 1971-04-16 8.35 1970-11-05 8.75 1970-09-11 9.15 1970-07-09 8.05 1970-05-05 7.95 1970-03-12 7.95 1970-01-05 8.05 1969-09-08 8.75 1969-06-12 8.05 1969-01-07 9.15 14 Site ID: 083000442T North Groundwater Flow: SSW 1/2-1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 35 ft Higher Deep Water Depth: Not Reported 1970-06-04 Deep Water Depth: 70 ft 8.25 Average Water Depth: Not Reported 1969-10-08 Date: 12/1996 15 Site ID: 083000209T ENE Groundwater Flow: WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Higher Deep Water Depth: Not Reported 1970-06-04 Average Water Depth: 33 8.25 Date: 05/09/1994 16 Site ID: 083002982T ENE Groundwater Flow: WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 8.58 Higher Deep Water Depth: Not Reported 1970-06-04 Deep Water Depth: 8.95 8.25 Average Water Depth: Not Reported 1969-10-08 Date: 11/03/1997 17 Site ID: 083000135T North Groundwater Flow: NNE 1/2-1 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported 8.75 Deep Water Depth: Not Reported 1970-06-04 Average Water Depth: 26 8.25 Date: 02/22/1995 AQUIFLOW 69459 AQUIFLOW 33998 AQUIFLOW 51934 AQUIFLOW 64529 TC4397232.2s Page A-19 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- 1971-05-06 8.35 1970-12-16 7.75 1970-10-08 8.75 1970-08-12 8.35 1970-06-04 8.15 1970-04-03 8.25 1970-02-16 7.85 1969-10-08 8.4 1969-07-07 8.35 1969-05-07 8.05 AQUIFLOW 69459 AQUIFLOW 33998 AQUIFLOW 51934 AQUIFLOW 64529 TC4397232.2s Page A-19 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database: CA Radon Radon Test Results Zipcode Num Tests 92707 14 > 4 pCi/L 0 Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 92707 Number of sites tested: 1 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L Living Area - 1 st Floor 0.700 pCi/L 100% 0% 0% Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported TC4397232.2s Page A-20 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4397232.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC4397232.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California's Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4397232.2s Page PSGR-3 APPENDIX C EDR ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN AND AUL SEARCH Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Inquiry Number: 4397232.7S September 08, 2015 EDR0 Environmental Data Resources Inc 6 Armstrong Road, Fourth Floor Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com EDR Environmental LienSearchTM Report The EDR Environmental LienSearch Report provides results from a search of available current land title records for environmental cleanup liens and other activity and use limitations, such as engineering controls and institutional controls. A network of professional, trained researchers, following established procedures, uses client supplied address information to: • search for parcel information and/or legal description; • search for ownership information; • research official land title documents recorded at jurisdictional agencies such as recorders' offices, registries of deeds, county clerks' offices, etc.; • access a copy of the deed; • search for environmental encumbering instrument(s) associated with the deed; • provide a copy of any environmental encumbrance(s) based upon a review of key words in the instrument(s) (title, parties involved, and description); and • provide a copy of the deed or cite documents reviewed. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This report was prepared for the use of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., and Discovery Research Solutions, LLC, exclusively. This report is neither a guarantee of title, a commitment to insure, or a policy of title insurance. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) and Discovery Research Solutions, LLC specifically disclaim the making of any such warranties, including without limitation, merchantability or fitness for a particular use or purpose. The information contained in this report is retrieved as it is recorded from the various agencies that make it available. The total liability is limited to the fee paid for this report. Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EDR Environmental LienSearchTM Report ADDRESS BRISTOL AUTOPLEX 375 BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 RESEARCH SOURCE Source 1: Orange Assessor Orange County, California Source 2: Orange Recorder Orange County, California PROPERTY INFORMATION Deed 1: Type of Deed: Partnership Grant Deed Title is vested in: J. Ray Sanderson/Cardinal Development -Bristol Center, a California general partnership Title received from: Bristol Partners, a general partnership Deed Recorded: 01/15/1987 Instrument: 87-025795 Legal Description: All that certain piece or parcel of land being Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 85-384, as shown on a map filed in Book 215, Pages 12 and 13 inclusive, of Parcel Maps, situate and lying in the County of Orange, State of California. Legal Current Owner: J. Ray Sanderson/Cardinal Development -Bristol Center, a California general partnership Property Identifiers: 119-200-33 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN Environmental Lien: Found ❑ Not Found If found: 1" Party: 2nd Party: Dated: Recorded: Book: Page: Docket: Volume: Instrument: Comments: Miscellaneous: EDR Environmental LienSearchTM Report OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS (AULS) Other AUL's: Found ❑ Not Found If found: 15' Party: 2nd Party: Dated: Recorded: Book: Page: Docket: Volume: Instrument: Comments: Miscellaneous: EDR Environmental LienSearchTm Report DEED EXHIBIT r Name s-mt Adams City & State i REOOi40040 REQUESTS -0 BY AAD WHEN Fit, CORDED MAIL TO J RAY—SANiiERSON DE7ELOPMENT , 2699 *,t+rHXTE ROAD, SUITE 150 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92713 ATTN: Mxchaal. D. Ray J MAM TAX STATFMENTS TO r -I J RAY—S;LIMERGON DEVELOPMENT Name 2699 WHITE ROAD, SUITE 150 Strm IRVI!=, CALIFORNIA 92714 Addr," Attn : Michael D. Ray City & State L _l CAT. NO. NNG05$3 To 1925 CA (11 -83) BTr025�5 $7.00 C 7 RECORDING liEGOESTED V TICOR TITLE liNS. CO. OF RECORDED IN OFF;CtAL RI =j!"FU� OF ORANGE COUN-rY. CAL -3 40 PM JAN ;t0 OV4fiE►�5}i;P 51A1E'.+Efai �O.UO c4r.a `+l.%� ---------L--SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDEF Paa alp Grant Deed THIO FORM FL'XN68FI3D BY TICOR TITL9 IKOURMS The undersigned grantor(s) declare(s): DW Tr 5I Doe_umemtary transfer tax isxl 522..71)LEE A. 8! A computed on frill value o; property conveyed, or �� Co.' � ('.t ( computed on full value fess value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale. { ) Unincorporated area: {; Cit'/ of Cc IT ane FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, BRISTOL PARTNERS a general partnership organized under the laws of the State of California hereby GRANTS to J . RAY S ANDERSON/C:ARDINAL DEVELOPMENT -- BRISTOL CENTER a California general partnership the folIGmAng described real propexty in the City of Costa Mesa C,o�anty of Orange , State of C91ifornia. FAKEL i OF PARCEL MAF NO. BY -384, IN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, COU :lRANGE, STAY, OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 215, 13 1W%#1"USIVE, OFPARCEL MAPS, IM THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDE1 'trot, I1fTti Dated. STATE OF r -A RNdA j �?F ? SS. ona,. 1 1 before me, the'undersigntd, a NjOoy Puglie isa atld)pr said personaUy kn&wn to me or proved to #e the :.asis of satisfactory evidence to be the If who exe- vetted the within insavment as 4,f the partners of the purte:tsbip that execvted the within instrument, ansa Acknowledged to me that such partnership executed the sante'. WITNESS my haqd and afFtt w scat. Signatu. BRISTOL PARTNERS, a California general pa: By: NEWPORT SHORES BUI: California Corpora - Ge rtner B SQNALD R. AYR President / J RAY-ERSON DEVELOP] a Cali rnia .geW.ral pa: By: By: By: Title Order No. Escrow or Loan No. MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED (ABOVE ILLEGIBLE NOTAP,Y SEAL DECLARATION GOVEP.1►iMENT CODE 27361.7 $7_025T95 I CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE NOTARY SEAL ON THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS STATEMENT IS ATTACHED READS AS FOLLOWS: NAME OF NOTARY S 1 �. ,i0 h} fit i qr- DATE COMMISSION EXPIRES._, COUNTY WHERE BOND IS FILED tn.,�.:4 PLACE OF EXECUTION SANTA ! A, CALIFORNIA DATE t WICORTITLE INSURANCE OF CALIFORNIA $Y: T ITLE OFFICER s STATE COUNTyF %ALI�� on ���e = �� : afore me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State. Xmnaliy appeared__ ' . L*� --- -- ----.—_+QMA* paisonally known to me (or prayed to me on the basis of satlstactor- evidencc; to be the persons w v executed the within instrument as- -President end— _ —__.—S*GfVary, on t;dt" r f _ 1�2k the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the within instrument pursuant tc its by. lavic ur ^ resoiutlon of Itsboardaf directors, said corporation be!rg ff-th&0mp to"bc — of the partners of— the e partnerahlp that executed the within Instrument, and ack- now',edged to me that such corporation executed the same as such pvrtner and that such partnership executed the same. OfFt't'4L UL HOTAM ONO couary COM. EXP. APR, 2A9M90 WITNESS my-qO and official ue L S#gnsture!M*_ {Tnis area for cfficial notarlat soaq APPENDIX D EDR PROPERTY TAX MAP REPORT Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Inquiry Number: 4397232.6 August 28, 2015 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 (rE D Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com EDR Property Tax Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s EDR Property Tax Map Report is designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential environmental conditions on a target property by understanding property boundaries and other characteristics. The report includes a search of available property tax maps, which include information on boundaries for the target property and neighboring properties, addresses, parcel identification numbers, as well as other data typically used in property location and identification. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to bi construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPT. PURPOSES ONLY. THE ASSESSOR MANES NO GUARANTEE AS TO ITS ACCURACY NOR ASSUACS ANY LIABILITY FOR OTHER USES. NOT TO BE REPRODUCED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 0 COPYRIGHT ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSOR 2010 ' 39 ^' 20 L4 Try I 719-20 � I I O Ad I C F" C 04 r 200' en DETA/L 'A II' 427-16 427-04 srwgr 1� 13 R/ e * - PAR2 SPAT R a 6W.Se" �ze.A1 1 W PAI 9 M ^ 3./791 I 1 1' = 400' 2 :lY7-y� A 34 t O Pi - .... mA/R IRVINE 439-3I j R.& 6/-4(36," 2.322AC3 ,Nd A orAAxWAA 1 LSMr 39 p Q 2 8 /4 AC " .'i•� d,p'0 R LOT/9B 0.04AC "zS C• 0 0 14 S v ° p, IeAA'4• MARCH 1951 2 e O M O ZZ -- 439-21 a N N 439-1 o e 30 R m IRVINE SUB. M.N. 1-88 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 8 ASSESSOR'S MAP rR. NO 456 M M 17-9 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 119 PAGE 20 PARCEL MAP P.M. 233-49 SHOWN /N CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE 4397232.6 Page 2 M 36 35 196/AC Ih 3 I MU a_ Bso' PEGASUS Si. &K 5 V (, TRACT NO. 56 0 4 l POR Lor / b 21 17 MINA Ol. i. 0 v 30 AC /06.96 AC o, 9.94AC 37 N Ik SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB h ti SUB 3 m M R 0 i MAS AC. a a m 9.99 AC C POR LOT/99 ti 2 � RB //0-90 LO LOPE Q :ESM'T.� DRIV MARCH 1951 2 e O M O ZZ -- 439-21 a N N 439-1 o e 30 R m IRVINE SUB. M.N. 1-88 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 8 ASSESSOR'S MAP rR. NO 456 M M 17-9 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 119 PAGE 20 PARCEL MAP P.M. 233-49 SHOWN /N CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE 4397232.6 Page 2 APPENDIX E CERTIFIED SANBORN® MAP REPORT Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Inquiry Number: 4397232.3 August 28, 2015 6 Armstrong Read, 41h Floor -Shelton, Onn nOGUCUt M484 (rEDR" T*IM Free: &00.�$2_0135O www.in.dtr%&t.com Certified Sanborn® Ma Site Name: Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 EDR Inquiry # 4397232.3 Client Name: Env. Management Strategies 16510 Aston Street Irvine, CA 92606-0000 Contact: Ashley Flores (rEDRO 8/28/15 The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Env. Management Strategies were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. Certified Sanborn Results: Site Name: Bristol Autoplex Address: 375 Bristol Street City, State, Zip: Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Cross Street: P.O. # EMS 547 Project: Bristol Autoplex Certification # 1258-4798-13157 UNMAPPED PROPERTY This report certifies that the complete holdings Library, LLC collection have been searched supplied target property information, and fire covering the target property were not found. Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Certification # 1258-4798-6157 The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track of the Sanborn historical property usage in approximately 12,000 based on client American cities and towns. Collections searched: insurance maps ✓ Library of Congress ✓ University Publications of America ✓ EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866TM Env. Management Strategies (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 4397232 - 3 page 2 APPENDIX F EDR HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAP REPORT Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Inquiry Number: 4397232.4 August 31, 2015 6 Armstrong Read, 41h Floor -Shelton, Onn nOGUCUt M484 (rEDR" T*IM Free: &00.�$2_0135O www.in.dtr%&t.com EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Historical Topographic Map TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: SANTA ANA ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores T MAP YEAR: 1901 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 15 Z SCALE: 1:62500 N T I A---.,(- 4IAI -' A S - s A N T A vr= _ deo /• T-F7,iew y 4 Iz _J •S -j" _ -- Lam, - . `� - _ � \ �, • � -9 \r•M'1 IF?i'f ��r:.Lf'i2 - - �� - f � �� � � `,�"` .:..moi,__ `..' - 'Y - % .��_ TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: SANTA ANA ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores T MAP YEAR: 1901 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:62500 Historical Topographic Map TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: SOUTHERN CA SHEET 1 ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores T MAP YEAR: 1901 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 60 SCALE: 1:250000 Historical Topographic Map 0 o} 0 t.I TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: CORONA ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores T MAP YEAR: 1902 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6643/-117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 30 SCALE: 1:125000 Historical Topographic Map TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores T MAP YEAR: 1935 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 r I II tp � '� ilcuixu� •� ;i, vjvjre,,- SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:31680 An��` r nr ) 1 oq2 Ao 00 7,9 J 0 •� `� V/CTq/1WR . S w,£CT, 43 E4,IM 6�• �. 1 I 7D,l— t �� .lei 7 � •� J�� ��i � !, r '=A..,. - ,; � —,;, 'rye •.'l � 4 r ,, � �,, I,�:� M � ,� s �r' :�rur �° 0� f .. • „' •` �,� ._.7% � '41, 1�f �'i`Ilr ur%' � �.: f,: [_ � � � 5 G �� y I r X - J N 0 W49 �•', � G J � � �\ _ _ _ _ .. • � I % alb � — 1., � n TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores T MAP YEAR: 1935 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:31680 Historical Topographic Map TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: SANTA ANA ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores T WOW Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Ell LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:50000 ON 1 Li MKS 121M 74 ���, ��A w�,1'.i �i� w ���I, F�� �" ~►f ► • ill ..,per, ��.. ': - '�K ��� � 1111`7 w� +� G► ;� .�dnjlr\�i1�a u.[�1�/fes TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: SANTA ANA ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores T MAP YEAR: 1942 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:50000 Historical Topographic Map � 30 Pa BM 42 1 6 Y li •u-� 2 - PAULARINA ,9 C-�'J Iii °� •ii `� � BAKER • ti P 17=— �i`J Ell Ac 7 � 1�.J till 1�1 Y �ti�'�-� �✓. +__ 1 � +* -� BA,5 ' ....... ..............p.,........... �❑ - �. COAST W� GCOLLEGEz _ _. ,\,- �q • fill �yy/�� LJUL ❑Q � H y � .. 1 � �y °ji r 4 04 F CO qR • COUNiRg k-ti5� BM M 50urk Rrv� 9y "• •�;• ••• .l; 64 •'••b: ,✓/��� ••`.'�rl CALIFON IA BIBLE CO EGE ,. �• • • • fP�63 ,�- BM 78 4P 78 ■ . •:: ��, + , r • an htaST ••, bq - ... ' .',,,�• .*Lind Au :�••:::: • •Schoo15 l k ay •/ ` •O.. "`�`• • • ` • 3 •tea 41 r • BM Sfi'r. _ Z• 4.1 ••• • ♦ � `r F '( • Ste, i TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores T MAP YEAR: 1951 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map JLto RP 'A I w Sch----T RES. I' y..id11d M QFiI L PA K -� - n I� • .� -- --. Q T F ,�� m e'yJ 4 Driv ......... I I. ! -lThea Bear S IRMO _ 1 11 ii l 34 11 r.1 35�FALlLARlNp �• 7 •� �; 1 V£ VI - q`e o . hs I .. 'Mese .� • , a __ — r.o -i _L !! 1! A 8 •ltl •• t t — LOGAII III • AVE ' ■ • # ry c. J ■ i C ■• r O � i M� 5 raile] ` POS gI 59 .\ o u r ■ '!1 D� ,�waym OILre - .gia aEs,or <f: ° y� lIi'! z,(O f. r) Wit �G t;a ('sesta Mesad • High SchFi 11 ach ' ,,� U - 1i� • ! ' N fes. - Davis Sch R> ®� . f /� .+; ; i ,� RK' '-- v I as sgCr M ' 5• c/ •, Orange C -% ` Colle w W�Yer � �o0➢DO � e \��• Fire. $u,W . \ — Fies - W .,. t•1 C7. > el � • a i ��ORANGE COV Y ,VIEW a C NTY IgG ND$ a' �• AIRFOFt, PITAL �a Sema And �• auxNL • ORIVE 189 - --� �:nuntrf Cku� ti .s- 71 r. r a hern Calif H ST D Shoppin TTrailer ate. -y p 6� J M s 1 sr❑I 7 �I Park TLSO Y I • __ � ,, Cy Vii_ ■ MOnte.� / a w ti � ail r-.� AY A �/` 69 JJ � q �'i l,iitd rg ✓ 'v / // V _- ---HAMILTON Sr 1 Trai r _1 �rlaltlly P i ' - •. •r tr' i + } r TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores MAP YEAR: 1965 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 T LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map n_ M 0 L A ill b o e � �. 1 erv} Lv� y� __ �r.!{ �.._.,� e� ele 1 � : w I r�,��%c�S Dfix��h� 1 ....... _ILJL�_I ..I eP �h 9 F S A C St I. : C 1 f■ ISP :: I r 1, II l� 71C':\� �� 8larinnaSr3� , �� ■ • : � � � � ��I!r,Aw� II sa Ve q �� �AULA.rzIN �� __J r•, _ � �� ' • rho• / ■ 11 _ ' _ w e� eLJJI I Qe BA_,�3J e... ° ..�, AVE' I . .I• . .J • - .i - _i �;� ■`o Baptist •+•Ir M •/ / • 6 Al � � ���, „. a+�4�1tt4n I crra y� 40 POrf 5�91� �Qo�f" our3 55 1 { I�;y ll" 11., .I 'I ��4ilgY'�IO�I -1 r"`: n Y �'i do®tx mesa ... - _ - - {f I NaCl l i • p 1• 11rr . L_::i: 1 . �L— High Sch 111 �' 1 .Irl _��'�•. _ — -- _1 TF.VVNKLL / �I 11 1�1 _DavisS- PARK - _ ) �■1* nge Coast r College ,�� M ♦ c poll l➢ , r Water ■ —%♦ •ry / \ti 1!' Tank O Res - - - - -'r o. w 1 - - �J i ORANGE 0011 NkY ` File Sld •'- O NO —VE—,V= ❑R W :_ AW ,: -1 J I�_ CD NT`e IRG UNpS �w 2 C� =.ate aiRPaRi FL.i/ + x _ antAna Country Club 'i,;i•}{ ��`�Ik' "JI " �.i—e�- 1� =i S.g-=-- -' .-DRIVE ri T! is ry,i—�I eM1 `z - ' ��_•,�,� 1` % 1 , i. ilk III fff \\YY \• here Calif \ \ le Cnllegeq �e� ' — sib .oma/ c q'E3M Pari} e' W!L 30 w �i� ., h 8 � � O S�� E "' Q�C� e��. % � ��••Munte�j�a � g ail r --j VoCADO sr ,�F� fj�� Pa rgljHAwLrDN . 1A Ij SLI rtd > w Trailer 4 0T ��� �:. `\ •,Sy 4 �� �\.Imo:,. ��I[) Trai r McNa1E \ �� Sch' �i 1 P k all QT TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NTNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores MAP YEAR: 1972 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 PHOTOREVISED FROM :1965 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map RES e a M -13M L PA ■ \ ill D of �� 2 erv) �leh i larino �- ■ e- ,�i'1 ■ I 00w _ W b L w ■L6 rT�� .IA ¢O a r ■ Ir ■' �I� si C WLi �� tZs 1 ��ror�roa=Rome crr 40 4 z ■ �� !• Yi ini�! 4F IN 69 3726 -6 - ' ■ - ° reOL Costa me",--- -------- r�,lr�l 1 �� +•■, �►, High Sch 111 li T rauli k ' E LE �l =1F'•= �� S''t • _ I Pte,« ��i�:•' + nSe Coal, M ■i- �� �_�- — til. •_ CollegelMf Tankvly -°b _._° ■11 rl,.l { . -'+ • - F r 1 9 R25 - MOVE OR W _,AYNE 401 C JNTY -�AIRGROUND,9� , 1�1`' ♦ EC �1 ' Santa Ana S/ G 7, IVA-6s 3725 i CollegeQ • �� Har i j y -90 6 ~ ) •r ( ,p ..�. 4 , 5hoppin �❑ �7railerl' Parjl i � � TI ail r— AVOCADO e s m y 37 F r. � 24 \ Pa411 /'M sLind r¢ ~ 5z SA v F7Trailer • A 1S s, , •,' M'. mal s\ Srh { } 3723 Q ch : ✓Y 1■:Q� >i \ lxa �T,"•�- 3� �� -.✓ land C Y1 Y iG 1�..Z➢.5. �, '✓4.Y'f fY.LT� /f TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NTNAME: NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores MAP YEAR: 1981 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 PHOTOREVISED FROM :1965 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map Unsurveyed Area on the Topographic Map ADJOINING QUAD RWAY BEACON 33 NAME: TUSTIN SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies N MAP YEAR: 1935 ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores zz Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SCALE: 1:31680 ;l , so N CA VA r ea /NNI'161111 JCC♦ �`, - ^, \:'G I j - 1 r 0 yq r J L_l _ I,� ti -(� G ` I� - r -!AS V ,' ✓ -' 7 '',l` + � ll ' '"' ` 4 - ,.rr Unsurveyed Area on the Topographic Map ADJOINING QUAD NAME: TUSTIN SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies N MAP YEAR: 1935 ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores TCosta Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SCALE: 1:31680 Historical Topographic Map rl a g" s Aliso Gun Club. 55 7 i / 111 R \ 4 ;Sprig dun Club �p 10 " tl m n �"11 JI 4. 9" q" ORANGE S • 45 0. AIR q5 La Mesa a Gun Club • \ �* �\ f�'�- � �� d J R San 30' rrt\ a q Salt Ponds _4 � /150 /' -. I \�_29- Sen Elev m°' Joa \� } V ou �� �, S ADJOINING QUAD NAME: TUSTIN SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies N MAP YEAR: 1948 ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores TCosta Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map �b � Well Well `y��9w�o Gn C��',r`Ir ♦\ :/ 24 Lu III A, 7 0 / /r>>\ ,......� ✓ f1 Wel n h / "� d^ � o (0T er ACV �`,�.�����\�9' \•��'"3' �'\`) �`\ illi a� �. ;5 ° kl'port a as ♦ 3726 ' Q�• 4 49 Cid \ �i \ � /:,�Q o � h e St 401 / • • a5 yo F n „i ', —Wel 5 Smoke BM 646 i }n� �e c4 , ��•� .,../ �� 8 ..--' p�( IAN 6 SAN JOAQtj 1 .'. 372 ,{ COI I N';F 10 Alli.; I f �9�`.�ti��K.�% 0 N N. 0DRIVE 58 a D Sa vlewl � \ (+Q��y`}��, �Sch 5C ( U\i \\ �F.7 79 l 3124 2, I _ m } 0 \ \ d x.;' `� h� Gun C1ut 10 I Salt19 m lEvapor ors W w h1 I I �. 54 // 0 4.3 ( // �tHEf C'iH`" .�N,at'e t NIVERNIT1 or CA rA �.. 23 e °R 62 ' I! UIm �a3 ".a) e 124. ADJOINING QUAD NAME: TUSTIN SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies N MAP YEAR: 1965 ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores TCosta Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map - - - -- --- - :--- _ - 0--------- ----- 4 11 eserva r Ld Well _-`" �p / ! Az Wel s 40 j 47F ort or Its 40 Fire Fire s14,417 � ��'" �� • ` J) � � i�III Wel /��♦ '�� ( _ I I Smokes T Ir Q /.� _ _ i` i�1M II,Y'�xw� BM 64 ��r�N. n snN J?A?l lwl. 4111 /i y _ qResefvoir j�,_' jf h •� r UA"� /I�//�/ _RIVE 59 Bx y "SCh Joa9�inh t �i Gun -:flub l 1 r �r.- i l 1 � s 10 41, ter_s�'_ R Evapora r' TY OF' CA Z, -W �0 � iii FAACHz `,-' ��t��l CNIVlIt,';l NE lA Al 124 r. ADJOINING QUAD NAME: TUSTIN SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NTMAP YEAR: 1972 ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores PHOTOREVISED FROM :1965 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map �Fteservoir i ``'i. �!s -7, • s •` 11 i „ r ell WNW i ♦ �a,p� 7 .,Weil 13 Wel of ( # • 4w `iY 4O S f j � � ♦ ` � yes:, fipart r r ' / l ;-77 y IV We� cr M 64 'pAN H6 SAN JBpWuiN DR y .� ILL RF NAL PAR Rayview JvrrN�tiT�• , .U. ¢ tri } I o • 4w Salt t �i� l�54 C� EvaparaWrs �. �,ir ti. • } CID. �11i�:r I �I1/irk I ♦� L ..! [�Nlf j�ETY OF (A - � ER �1� � .JI�1iii '• :i��, -/RWPO..EACH � I rankr.pr�rKV r 137 x 'so cin 124 �`4i .c lP X3%0 ♦ �, ,I l 7 ,�� � -- r� _ ,.\ �. ��. ,,,<, ADJOINING QUAD NAME: TUSTIN SITE NAME: Bristol Autoplex CLIENT: Env. Management Strategies NTMAP YEAR: 1981 ADDRESS: 375 Bristol Street CONTACT: Ashley Flores PHOTOREVISED FROM :1965 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4397232.4 SERIES: 7.5 LAT/LONG: 33.6643 / -117.8795 RESEARCH DATE: 08/31/2015 SCALE: 1:24000 APPENDIX G EDR AERIAL PHOTO DECADE PACKAGE Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Inquiry Number: 4397232.12 August 31, 2015 6 Armstrong Read, 41h Floor -Shelton, Onn nOGUCUt M484 (rEDR" T*IM Free: &00.�$2_0135O www.in.dtr%&t.com EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: Aerial Photography August 31, 2015 Target Property: 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Year Scale Details Source 1938 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' Flight Year: 1938 USGS 1947 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 1947 Fairchild 1952 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 1952 USGS 1963 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 1963 USGS 1972 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 1972 USGS 1977 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 1977 EDR Proprietary Brewster Pacific 1985 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 1985 USGS 1989 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 1989 USGS 1990 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 1990 USGS 1994 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' /DOQQ - acquisition dates: 1994 USGS/DOQQ 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2009 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 "=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 4397232.12 2 p Y1 A Ys. rt d ��t� Y �> • moi► ; .. lb. 4b M, r. INQUIRY M 4397232.12 4 N YEAR: 1938 (rEDR J �� = 500'"all � 1 j� • I � y � j� 0 INQUIRY M 4397232.12 4 N i YEAR: 1963 1500' (rEDR .x AW 4tF Li Ilk- Wr ow fid' � r�• �� a a�4','s � �� '* 39 ..� .. � �f .. .:,.�.; .+• y . � � ,�,• � �`�, -, fi :.3!="', +• .`act 4 `;1'- w` All h' _ �, k f,✓ �� * >� �` l� .„ _ " 4f. (1 • �',1�'.. yy .fix - �, .��✓ * ',{_ o.��'�►�g�.k� a ., `Y �+y1. �,ty:, _i'4L t r 1 . : •.i�4/l ��.�1p�` 9 Y �� � a, a -�' S/\�\moi I � � ` '^ --+�.� •`.. �.. x.a'7- '. - '� 1 " E pi. \'�,' // �., 'h• !, F 1 �� I � � � 4 I • �G ?• 47 ' �•�.. r � air "�' \ • •�.�., � ��. / r / a iii ` r • ' � ,�� � a r, ,�� /,�' k ," _ _5+/. ;j 'e,► �. �� , r � ° war." ^.�'.Y q \\��.` n� ti y� Now, ir 'e't4oN� e— YAO ♦. \ �� ,1,• a 0 Wp. A RIF WC IF eo lk • at 4s of IN ir INQUIRY #: 4397232.12 OK 4N YEAR: 1994 (rEDR 500' .dab,,. Fi4 '�� ,,\ +•,+, 1 it � /' r :.` /K��.17,kk 1 f.. i •i � % � ���'�•`' .• 1.40 lir �' � � ,�. \ �,` `. /_� •"., f '/`}% i j r ��' ,mow : •�`_ - •rte � � �� �" �'-= � � I \� i E l f• • Av,-�-rte« � . � . ;' . • ` + e gar Akk 7 r� w � � � � � • � sus 71 INQUIRY #: 4397232.12 i > YEAR: 2012 ED� ',� % ! = 500 APPENDIX H EDR CITY DIRECTORY ABSTRACT Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Inquiry Number: 4397232.5 August 28, 2015 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 (rE D Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images TABLE OF CONTENTS Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities EDR's City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals. Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1920 through 2013. This report compiles information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property. A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Source TP Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 2013 Cole Information Services X X X - 2008 Cole Information Services X X X - 2003 Cole Information Services X X X - 2002 Haines Company X X X - 2001 Pacific Telephone - - - - 1997 Pacific Bell - - - - 1995 Pacific Bell X X X - 1992 Pacific Bell - - - - 1991 Pacific Bell X X X - 1986 Pacific Bell - X X - 1980 Pacific Telephone - X X - 1975 Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. - X X - 1971 Luskey Brothers Co., Inc. - - - - 1970 General Telephone Co., of California - X X - 1966 Pacific Telephone - X X - 1965 Luskey Brothers - X X - 1961 Luskey Brothers & Co., - - - - 1960 Luskey Brothers & Co., - X X - 1956 Luskey Brothers - X X - 1955 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. - X X - 1952 Luskeys Directory Service Co. - - - - 1950 West Directory Co. - - - - 1946 Southern California Telephone Co. - - - - 1945 Western Directory Co. - - - - 1941 Southern California Telephone Co. - - - - 4397232-5 Pagel EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Year Source TP Adioining Text Abstract Source Image 1936 Western Directory Co. - X X - 1930 Western Directory Co. - X X - 1926 Pacific Telephone - - - - 1925 Western Directory Co. - - - - 1922 Western Directory Co. - X X - 1921 Western Directory Co. - X X - 1920 Santa Ana Directory Co. - - - - 4397232-5 Page 2 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 FINDINGS DETAIL Target Property research detail. BRISTOL 375 BRISTOL Year Uses Source 1995 Ability Fire Equipment Inc 5404840 Pacific Bell BRISTOL ST 375 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 2013 CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS Cole Information Services CARDINAL DEVELOPEMENT CO Cole Information Services DING KING THE Cole Information Services EURO WEST ROVER Cole Information Services EXCELLENCE AUTOMOTIVE Cole Information Services FOREIGN WORKS THE Cole Information Services IMARI Cole Information Services NEWPORT SMOG TEST ONLY CENTER Cole Information Services OC BENZ Cole Information Services SADDLEBACK AUTOMOTIVE Cole Information Services SAEILO MOTORS INC Cole Information Services SANDWICH WORLD Cole Information Services SUNDANCE WINDOW TINTING Cole Information Services TOPLINE Cole Information Services WAVES AUTO SOUND Cole Information Services WINDSHIELD PROS Cole Information Services XS GARAGE DOORS COSTA MESA Cole Information Services 2008 A OK MUFFLER Cole Information Services AUTOCARE EXPRESS Cole Information Services CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS Cole Information Services CALIFORNIA COVENTRY Cole Information Services 4397232-5 Page 3 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2008 CARDINAL DEVELOPMENT CO Cole Information Services E L F ENTERPRISES INC Cole Information Services EURO WEST ROVER Cole Information Services HOUSE DR HANDY MAN SERVICES Cole Information Services IMARI Cole Information Services JIFFY LUBE Cole Information Services NEWPORT SMOG Cole Information Services SADDLEBACK SMOG & REPAIR Cole Information Services SAEILO MOTORS INC Cole Information Services SANDWICH WORLD Cole Information Services SUNDANCE WINDOW TINTING Cole Information Services WAVES AUTO SOUND Cole Information Services 2003 A OK MUFFLER AUTO REPAIR Cole Information Services AUTO CTR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION Cole Information Services AUTOCARE EXPRESS Cole Information Services CARDINAL DEVELOPMENT CO Cole Information Services CARDINAL SELF STORAGE V Cole Information Services EURO WEST Cole Information Services EXTRA STORAGE NEWPORT MESA Cole Information Services FOX RENT A CAR Cole Information Services HILLBANK MOTOR CORP Cole Information Services IMARI Cole Information Services IMARI RESTAURANT Cole Information Services QUICK PASS SMOG TEST ONLY CTR Cole Information Services ROLLS ROYCE LIMOUSINES Cole Information Services SADDLEBACK SMOG & REPAIR Cole Information Services SAEILO MOTORS Cole Information Services XAD GROUP INC Cole Information Services 2002 AUTOMOTIVE SAEILOMOTORS Haines Company BUILDING AUTOCARE EXPRESS Haines Company CALIFORNIA BRAKE Haines Company COLUBECTS QUANTUM MECHANICS Haines Company CORPORATION IMARI Haines Company COVENTRY CARDINAL DEVLP CO Haines Company COVENTRY JIFFY LUBE ORANGE Haines Company DIGITAL DIFFERENCE Haines Company HILLBANK MOTOR Haines Company INC WIRED FOR SOUND Haines Company 4397232-5 Page 4 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2002 JAGUAR INDP SVCA Haines Company SADDLEBACK Haines Company STAND Haines Company SUB STATION 2D Haines Company SUNDANCEWINDOW Haines Company TINTING TIRES WAREHOUSE Haines Company WIRED FOR SOUND Haines Company WORKS CALIFORNIA Haines Company WRD FOR SND FOREIGN WORKS THE Haines Company 1995 Abigails Custom Catering Pacific Bell Abigails Soupor Sandwiches Pacific Bell Advanced Euro Cars Pacific Bell Audi Service Center Pacific Bell Autoplex Transmissions Pacific Bell Benz & Beamer Pacific Bell BMW Service Center Pacific Bell California Brake Works Pacific Bell Cardinal Development Cc Pacific Bell Centers Pacific Bell Dr Autoplex Pacific Bell First Choice Auto Repair Pacific Bell Foreign Works The Pacific Bell Imari Pacific Bell Jaguar Service Center Pacific Bell Jiffy Lube Pacific Bell Mercedez Benz Service Center Pacific Bell Nationwide Cellular Pacific Bell Newport Accessories & Parts Pacific Bell Porsche Service Center Pacific Bell Priority Auto Care Pacific Bell Quality Auto Pacific Bell SAAB Service Center Pacific Bell Saddleback Automotive Pacific Bell Soupor Sandwiches Pacific Bell Volkswagen Service Center Pacific Bell Volvo Service Center Pacific Bell 1991 Abigails Custom Catering Pacific Bell Abigails Soupor Sandwiches Pacific Bell 4397232-5 Page 5 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Benz & Beamer Pacific Bell Beringer Window Tinting Pacific Bell Brake Express Pacific Bell Cardinal Development Cc Pacific Bell Dao Audio & Alarms Pacific Bell Dial Pizza Express Pacific Bell Diversified Telecom Pacific Bell forelgi Works The Pacific Bell Ken Sushi Pacific Bell Multistate Transmissions Pacific Bell Newport Accessories & Parts Pacific Bell Positive Tints Pacific Bell Pozutive Testi Pacific Bell Priority Auto Care Pacific Bell Soupor Sandwiches Pacific Bell Sour Michael @Huntington Beach@ Pacific Bell Southwest Leasing & Rental Inc Pacific Bell Stores Pacific Bell Tech Fm Ssh Pacific Bell Tintz Pacific Bell 4397232-5 Page 6 FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. BRISTOL 1607 BRISTOL Year Uses Source 1995 Baron Pool Plastering Co Inc Pacific Bell 355 BRISTOL Year Uses Source 1995 Jason Kenneth Designs Pacific Bell BRISTOL CIR 333 BRISTOL CIR Year Uses Source 1986 Laguna Beach @Artesia@ Museum a Pacific Bell BRISTOL ST 1607 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1960 Miller AC KI 2 a Luskey Brothers & Co., 1609 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1960 Pithod JM KI 7 a Luskey Brothers & Co., 1631 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1960 Yummies Inc KI 7 a Luskey Brothers & Co., 275 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 2008 TRUSPEED MOTORCARS Cole Information Services 303 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1960 PO Bristol Sta KI 7 a Luskey Brothers & Co., 4397232-5 Page 7 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1956 Vacant Luskey Brothers 305 BRISTOL ST 2008 Year Uses Source 1956 Forsberg C P Luskey Brothers 309 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1956 Fredrickson D E Luskey Brothers 311 BRISTOL ST 1995 Year Uses Source 1960 Bristol Beverages KI 3 a Luskey Brothers & Co., 313 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1956 Balderama F E Luskey Brothers 315 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1960 Bristol Florists Ki 2 a Luskey Brothers & Co., 317 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1956 Master Chas Luskey Brothers 323 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1956 Hanson Phil & Associates br OCampo J A Luskey Brothers 325 BRISTOL ST Year Uses 2013 AYRES HOTEL & SUITES COSTA MESA 2008 AYRES GROUP 2003 CNTRY INN & SUITES NWPRT BEACH 2002 NWPRTBCH LE CHATEAU COUNTRYINNBY AYRES COUNTRYINNBY AYRES COUNTRYSIDE SUITES 1995 Country Inn By Ayres Country Side Inn Newport Beachi Source Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Cole Information Services Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell 4397232-5 Page 8 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1995 Newport Beach Country Side Inn Pacific Bell Le Chateau Pacific Bell 1991 Newport Beach Country Side Inn Pacific Bell Le Chateau Pacific Bell Country Side Inn Newport Beach Pacific Bell Country Inn By Ayres Pacific Bell 1986 R & R Mechanical Pacific Bell 333 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 2013 SONY STORE Cole Information Services 2008 CORNER BAKERY CAFE Cole Information Services THE WRAPPER Cole Information Services BAG N BAGGAGE LTD Cole Information Services GAMESTOP Cole Information Services KIEHLS SINCE 1851 Cole Information Services CHOO JIMMY USA INC Cole Information Services BLACK STARR & FROST Cole Information Services SEARS ROEBUCK & CO Cole Information Services SEARS HEARING AID CENTER Cole Information Services CLUB MANOCO US LLC Cole Information Services 2003 LAUNDRY Cole Information Services SOFTWARE ETC Cole Information Services YVES SAINT LAURENT Cole Information Services 2002 OSEARS Roebuck Haines Company 1980 Hartstein Joseph I Pacific Telephone Isaacs Robert R Dr optmtrst Pacific Telephone Lancome btv inst Pacific Telephone Lynns Hallmark Shop Pacific Telephone LION DAN DR opltmtrst : Pacific Telephone 355 BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 2013 FRIAR TUX SHOP Cole Information Services MARSYLAS STUDIO Cole Information Services FLOWER FUSION Cole Information Services DAVID SALON THE Cole Information Services KENNETH JASON DESIGNS Cole Information Services AYRES GROUP Cole Information Services 4397232-5 Page 9 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2013 CINDERELLA CAKES INC Cole Information Services I DO HONEYMOONS TRVL & TOUR CO Cole Information Services 2008 FRIAR TUX SHOP Cole Information Services JASON KENNETH DESIGNS INC Cole Information Services THE DAVID SALON Cole Information Services CINDERELLA CAKES Cole Information Services ESSENCE ENTERTAINMENT TALENT Cole Information Services AGENCY MARSYLAS STUDIO Cole Information Services AYRES HOTELS Cole Information Services ROLLS ROYCE LIMOUSINES Cole Information Services MON AMIE Cole Information Services AUSTRALIAN TRAVEL Cole Information Services HEADQUARTERS 2003 COUNTRY INN & SUITES Cole Information Services ROGER DE YOUNG CONSTRUCTION Cole Information Services CO AYRES GROUP Cole Information Services BUENA PARK BUILDING Cole Information Services JASON KENNETH DESIGNS Cole Information Services MARSYLAS STUDIO Cole Information Services CINDERELLA CAKES Cole Information Services WEDDING CREATORS NETWORK Cole Information Services FRIAR TUX SHOP Cole Information Services FRANK H AYRES & SON MANAGEMENT Cole Information Services CORP MON AMIE BRIDAL Cole Information Services 2002 BUILDING AYRES DE YOUNG Haines Company AYRES GROUP Haines Company CINDERELLA CAKES Haines Company DAVIDSALONTHE Haines Company DE YOUNG Haines Company CONSTRUCTION CO DE YOUNG Haines Company ROGER ESSENCE ENTRTNMNT Haines Company FRANK H AYRES MNG Haines Company FRIAR TUX SHOP Haines Company I DO HONEYMOONS Haines Company JASON KENNETH Haines Company DESIGNS SOCLDIV MARSYLAS Haines Company STUDIO 4397232-5 Page 10 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2002 MON AMIE BRIDAL Haines Company SALON MON AMIE BRIDAL Haines Company SALON ROLLS ROYCE Haines Company LIMOUSINES Haines Company 1995 Allison Scott Collection Pacific Bell Ayres De Young Pacific Bell Ayres Group Pacific Bell Bader Virginia Fine Arts Pacific Bell Bader Virginia Fine Arts Pacific Bell Cinderella Cakes By Weiss Bakery Pacific Bell De Young Construction Co Pacific Bell De Young Roger Pacific Bell Diamonds Etc Pacific Bell ESSENCE ENTERTAINMENT Pacific Bell Frank H Ayres & Son Management Corp Pacific Bell Friar Tux Shop Pacific Bell GLASSICAL DESIGNS glass engraving Pacific Bell Jason Kenneth Designs Pacific Bell Marsylas Studio Pacific Bell MONAMIE BRIDAL & FORMAL Pacific Bell Mon Amie Bridal & Formal Pacific Bell Sun Coast Travel Pacific Bell 1991 A Private Image Salon Pacific Bell Ayres De Young Pacific Bell Bader Virginia Fine Arts Pacific Bell Cinderella Cakes By Weiss Bakery Pacific Bell De Young Construction Co Pacific Bell De Young Roger Pacific Bell Deyoung Roger & Sandy Pacific Bell Diamonds Etc Pacific Bell Essence Entertainment Pacific Bell Fingers Salon Pacific Bell Fingers Tanning Salon Pacific Bell Floral Design Centre Of Costa Mesa Pacific Bell Frank H Ayres & Son Management Corp Pacific Bell Friar Tux Shop Pacific Bell Marsylas Studio Pacific Bell Mon Amie Bridal & Formal Pacific Bell 4397232-5 Page11 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 MON AMIE BRIDAL & FORMAL Pacific Bell Orange County Wedding Services Pacific Bell Personal Fair Wedding Invitations Pacific Bell Personal Growth Counseling Center Pacific Bell Personal Hair And Skin Consultant Center Pacific Bell Private Image Pacific Bell PRIVATE IMAGE SALON Pacific Bell BRISTOL ST N 1514 BRISTOL ST N Year Uses Source 1936 P L Rose Western Directory Co. 1930 W B Faulkner Western Directory Co. 1922 W E Faulkner Western Directory Co. 1921 W E Faulkner Western Directory Co. BRISTOL ST S 303 BRISTOL ST S Year Uses Source 1936 R L Alexander Western Directory Co. 1930 W C King Western Directory Co. 305 BRISTOL ST S Year Uses Source 1936 K L Harbert Western Directory Co. 1930 N D Nash Western Directory Co. 313 BRISTOL ST S Year Uses Source 1936 G W Rupert Western Directory Co. 1930 J P Kenyon Western Directory Co. 323 BRISTOL ST S Year Uses Source 1936 Geo Reyes Western Directory Co. 1930 Geo Reyes Western Directory Co. 4397232-5 Page 12 FINDINGS INDUS 1651 INDUS Uses Year Uses Source 1966 Mac Queen J A Pacific Telephone 1661 INDUS Pacific Bell Year Uses Source 1966 Newton Earl B Pacific Telephone 1671 INDUS Hemley Annelle Year Uses Source 1966 Davis Adella Pacific Telephone Davis Glen R Pacific Telephone Davis Jack R Pacific Telephone Vernon Gladys L Pacific Telephone Davis Sandy Pacific Telephone INDUS ST 1651 INDUS ST Uses Year Uses Source 2002 HARVEYJemes Haines Company 1995 Luzzi Jim Pacific Bell 1991 Luzzi Jim Pacific Bell 1661 INDUS ST Year Uses Source 2002 HEMLEYAnnelle Haines Company 1995 Hemley Annelle Pacific Bell 1991 Hemley Annelie Pacific Bell 1986 Hemley Annelle Pacific Bell 1980 Lemont Ind Pacific Telephone 1671 INDUS ST Year Uses Source 2002 LOOMAN Kathleen Haines Company 1995 Looman Steve & Kathy Pacific Bell 1991 Looman Steve & Kathy Pacific Bell 1986 Freely Roger Pacific Bell 4397232-5 Page 13 KLINE DR 19292 KLINE DR Year Uses 1975 Jackson W A 19296 KLINE DR Year Uses 2002 SGARCIAClaudio 1980 Gala Luisito G 1966 Garcia Mary 1980 Garcia John Z Garcia Chris 20081 KLINE DR Year Uses 1970 Beard Kenneth L Beard Jean 1966 Beard Kenneth L Beard Jean 20082 KLINE DR Year Uses 2002 ROGERS Dewayne 1995 May Thomas 1991 Ell Edward & Christine 1980 Ell Eric Edward 20091 KLINE DR Year Uses 2002 SLECLERCJacqueetne 1966 Leclerc Robt 20092 KLINE DR Year Uses 2002 MCGREGORJohn 1986 Kettley Richard Kettley Richard 1980 Kettley Richard Kettley Richard 1975 Kettley Richard FINDINGS Source Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Source Haines Company Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Source General Telephone Co., of California General Telephone Co., of California Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Source Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Source Haines Company Pacific Telephone Source Haines Company Pacific Bell Pacific Bell Pacific Telephone Pacific Telephone Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 4397232-5 Page 14 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1966 Lindsay M N Pacific Telephone Ernst Lee Pacific Telephone Ernst Bob G Pacific Telephone 20102 KLINE DR Year Uses Source 2002 NIEWIAROWSKIM Haines Company 1986 Heberger A Wm & Helen Pacific Bell 1975 Printing Mart Of @Costa Mesa@ Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Heberger A Wm Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Deca Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Neilt Clyde L Pacific Telephone 20111 KLINE DR Year Uses Source 2002 BOVEEOlson Loren Haines Company 1991 Staggs Florence & Edwin Pacific Bell 1986 Staggs Florence Edwin Pacific Bell 1980 Stagge Florence Edwin Pacific Telephone Wilkinson Nikki Edward Pacific Telephone 1975 Wilkinson Florence Gladys Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Engelbart Keith D Pacific Telephone 20112 KLINE DR Year Uses Source 2002 BENSENDLaurils Haines Company 1975 Hunter Wm S Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Ellis Helen P General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Ellis Helen P Pacific Telephone 20121 KLINE DR Year Uses Source 2002 DAVIDSONGVry Haines Company PACIFIC NEW OPTIONS Haines Company 1991 Varento T Pacific Bell 1980 Head Wm J Pacific Telephone 1975 Head Wm J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Mahr Douglas O General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Mahr Douglas D Pacific Telephone 4397232-5 Page 15 FINDINGS 20122 KLINE DR RIVERSIDE DR Year Uses Source 1975 Blanciak Dennis Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 20141 KLINE DR Gay Thos S Year Uses Source 2002 BIESER Malhew Haines Company 1980 Blakely Robt L Pacific Telephone 1975 Pridonoff Eugene Capt USN Ret Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Pridonoff Eugene Capt USN Ret General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Pridonoff Eugene Capt USN Ret Pacific Telephone 20142 KLINE DR Robertson Keith E Year Uses Source 2003 DB GOLF INC Cole Information Services Source DB GOLF INC Cole Information Services 2002 MILLER Michael Haines Company Haines Company KAMOVSKI Franz Haines Company 1995 Miller Michael Pacific Bell 1966 Osmus Wm H Pacific Telephone RIVERSIDE DR 20111 RIVERSIDE DR Year Uses Source 2002 SANDERS P 6rara Haines Company 1966 Gay Thos S Pacific Telephone 20112 RIVERSIDE DR Year Uses Source 2002 ROBERTSONGoerge L Haines Company 1995 Robertson Goerge L Pacific Bell 1975 Robertson Keith E Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Robertson Keith E General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Robertson Keith E Pacific Telephone 20121 RIVERSIDE DR Year Uses Source 2003 CAPITAL TECHNIQUES LTD Cole Information Services 2002 CAPITAL TECHNIQUES Haines Company PLISCO Daed Haines Company 4397232-5 Page 16 FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1995 Capital Techniques Ltd Pacific Bell 1975 Taylor John W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Taylor John W General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Taylor John W Pacific Telephone 20122 RIVERSIDE DR Year Uses Source 2002 RICHARDSONEd Haines Company 1995 Richardson Ed Pacific Bell 1975 Richardson Ed Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Richarclson Ed General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Richardson Ed Pacific Telephone 20141 RIVERSIDE DR Year Uses Source 2002 IRELAND Gad Haines Company IRELANDDean Haines Company 1995 Ireland Dean & Gall Pacific Bell 1975 Rinaldi R J Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Rinaldi R J General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Rinaldi R J Pacific Telephone 20142 RIVERSIDE DR Year Uses Source 2008 LAZY E RANCH LLC Cole Information Services 2002 EDLERPaul Haines Company 1975 Salyer John W Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Salyer John W Pacific Telephone S BRISTOL ST 355 S BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1991 United Carpet Pacific Bell SE BRISTOL 1192 SE BRISTOL Year Uses Source 1980 Rail Lome C Pacific Telephone 4397232-5 Page 17 FINDINGS SE BRISTOL ST 1201 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1980 O CAMP S OAE Pacific Telephone 1206 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1980 Radovch William d VM Pacific Telephone 1212 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1995 Ostioneria Santa ANAHEIM Pacific Bell Santa ANAHEIM Pacific Bell Vans Tenn ISLAND Shoes Pacific Bell 1980 Providence Speech & Hearing Thrift Shop Pacific Telephone 1300 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1980 Behavioral Medical Group Inc Pacific Telephone BE HAVIOR T@Huntington Beach@ Pacific Telephone RAPY AN D RE S E ARCH IN S TITUTE 1330 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1980 Martinkovic K L Pacific Telephone Murphy Robt L Pacific Telephone 1441 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1980 DONS S @Huntington Beach@ LL S E Pacific Telephone RVICE 1512 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1986 BIRCHLE RS PALIS ADE S S Pacific Bell @Huntington Beach@ LL 1605 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses Source 1965 A&W Root Beer Drive In Als Luskey Brothers 4397232-5 Page 18 303 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses 1965 Thomas H 317 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses 1965 Crockett Thos 323 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses 1965 Ray Villa Ray Villa OCampo Rlty Invest 442 SE BRISTOL ST Year Uses 1995 Villanueva Fernando SW KLINE DR 19296 SW KLINE DR Year Uses 1955 Wallace David Newton FINDINGS Source Luskey Brothers Source Luskey Brothers Source Luskey Brothers Luskey Brothers Luskey Brothers Source Pacific Bell Source The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 4397232-5 Page 19 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 375 Bristol Street 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1192 SE BRISTOL 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1201 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1206 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1212 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1300 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1330 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1441 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1512 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1514 BRISTOL ST N 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1926, 1925,1920 1605 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1607 BRISTOL 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1607 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1609 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1631 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1651 INDUS 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1651 INDUS ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1661 INDUS 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1661 INDUS ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1671 INDUS 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1671 INDUS ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 19292 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 19296 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 19296 SW KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20081 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20082 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20091 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20092 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20102 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 20111 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20111 RIVERSIDE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20112 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921.1920 20112 RIVERSIDE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20121 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20121 RIVERSIDE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 20142 KLINE DR 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20121 RIVERSIDE DR 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 20142 KLINE DR 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20122 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 20142 RIVERSIDE DR 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20122 RIVERSIDE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 20142 RIVERSIDE DR 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20141 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20141 RIVERSIDE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20142 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20142 KLINE DR 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20142 RIVERSIDE DR 2013, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 20142 RIVERSIDE DR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 275 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 303 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 303 BRISTOL ST S 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 303 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 305 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 305 BRISTOL ST S 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 309 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 311 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 313 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 313 BRISTOL ST S 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 315 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 317 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 317 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 323 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 323 BRISTOL ST S 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 323 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 325 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 325 BRISTOL ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 333 BRISTOL CIR 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 333 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 333 BRISTOL ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 355 BRISTOL 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 355 BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 355 BRISTOL ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 355 S BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 442 SE BRISTOL ST 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 APPENDIX I EDR BUILDING PERMIT REPORT Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Inquiry Number: 4397232.8 August 28, 2015 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 CrE D Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com SECTION About This Report Executive Summary Findings Glossary TABLE OF CONTENTS Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EDR BUILDING PERMIT REPORT About This Report The EDR Building Permit Report provides a practical and efficient method to search building department records for indications of environmental conditions. Generated via a search of municipal building permit records gathered from more than 1,600 cities nationwide, this report will assist you in meeting the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. Building permit data can be used to identify current and/or former operations and structures/features of environmental concern. The data can provide information on a target property and adjoining properties such as the presence of underground storage tanks, pump islands, sumps, drywells, etc., as well as information regarding water, sewer, natural gas, electrical connection dates, and current/former septic tanks. ASTM and EPA Requirements ASTM E 1527-13 lists building department records as a "standard historical source," as detailed in § 8.3.4.7: "Building Department Records - The term building department records means those records of the local government in which the property is located indicating permission of the local government to construct, alter, or demolish improvements on the property." ASTM also states that "Uses in the area surrounding the property shall be identified in the report, but this task is required only to the extent that this information is revealed in the course of researching the property itself." EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) states: "§312.24: Reviews of historical sources of information. (a) Historical documents and records must be reviewed for the purposes of achieving the objectives and performance factors of §312.20(e) and (f). Historical documents and records may include, but are not limited to, aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, building department records, chain of title documents, and land use records." Methodology EDR has developed the EDR Building Permit Report through our partnership with BuildFax, the nation's largest repository of building department records. BuildFax collects, updates, and manages building department records from local municipal governments. The database now includes 30 million permits, on more than 10 million properties across 1,600 cities in the United States. The EDR Building Permit Report comprises local municipal building permit records, gathered directly from local jurisdictions, including both target property and adjoining properties. Years of coverage vary by municipality. Data reported includes (where available): date of permit, permit type, permit number, status, valuation, contractor company, contractor name, and description. Incoming permit data is checked at seven stages in a regimented quality control process, from initial data source interview, to data preparation, through final auditing. To ensure the building department is accurate, each of the seven quality control stages contains, on average, 15 additional quality checks, resulting in a process of approximately 105 quality control "touch points." For more information about the EDR Building Permit Report, please contact your EDR Account Executive at (800) 352-0050. CEDR8 Environmental Data Resources Inc It I WYMI, ,P& PROPERTY HISTORY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SEARCH DOCUMENTATION A search of building department records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) on behalf of Env. Management Strategies on Aug 28, 2015. TARGET PROPERTY 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 SEARCH METHODS EDR searches available lists for both the Target Property and Surrounding Properties. RESEARCH SUMMARY Building permits identified: YES The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Costa Mesa Year Source TF Ad joinina 2012 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 2011 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 2010 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 2009 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 2008 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 2007 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 2006 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S X 2005 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S X 2004 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S X 2003 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 2002 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 2001 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 2000 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S 1999 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S X 1998 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S X City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building S X BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Name: Costa Mesa Years: 1998-2012 Source: City of Costa Mesa, Development Services, Building Safety Division, COSTA MESA, CA Phone: (714) 754-5273 Name: Anaheim Years: 2000-2015 Source: City of Anaheim, Planning & Building Department, Anaheim, CA Phone: (714) 765-5153 4397232-8 Pagel Name: Irvine Years: 1982-2015 Source: City of Irvine, Building and Safety, IRVINE, CA Phone: (949)724-6470 Name: Orange Years: 1988-2015 Source: City of Orange, Community Development, ORANGE, CA Phone: (714)744-7200 Name: Orange County Years: 1990-2015 Source: Orange County, Planning and Development Services, SANTA ANA, CA Phone: (714)834-5238 Name: San Bernardino County Years: 2002-2015 Source: San Bernardino County, Land Use, Building & Safety, SAN BERNARDINO, CA Phone: (909) 387-8311 Name: Huntington Beach Years: 1996-2015 Source: Huntington Beach, Dept. of Building and Safety, Huntington Beach, CA Phone: (714) 536-5241 Name: Newport Beach Years: 2003-2015 Source: City of Newport Beach, Community Development Department, NEWPORT BEACH, CA Phone: (949) 718-1888 4397232-8 Page 2 TARGET PROPERTY FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY DETAIL 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 375 BRISTOL ST Date: 5/6/1998 Permit Type: ACCSTR Description: CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM BRISTOL ST SIDE & RELOCATE TWO ACCESSIBLE PARKING Permit Description: Accessory Structure Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number: B98-00780 Status: FINALED Valuation: $5,000.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 4397232-8 Page 3 ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. BRISTOL ST 325 BRISTOL ST Date: 7/1/2005 Permit Type: ALT—COM Description: 179 WINDOWS CHANGE OUT FOR "NEWPORT COUNTRY INN & SUITES INC". NO CHANGE IN SIZE OR HEADE Permit Description: Alter Commercial (T.I.) Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number: B05-01099 Status: FINALED Valuation: $86,600.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: AYRES GROUP Date: 10/5/2004 Permit Type: ROOF Description: REROOF "COUNTRY INN SUITES HOTEL": INSTALL PVC SINGLE PLY ROOF OVER 1 LAYER OF EPS (EXPAN 17,000 SQ FT Permit Description: Re -Roof Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number: B04-01719 Status: FINALED Valuation: $66,325.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: CONEX ROOFING COMPANY 4397232-8 Page 4 ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS 345 BRISTOL ST Date: 2/11/2005 Permit Type: BLKWALL Description: CONSTRUCT 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL WITH 1'4" RETAINING PORTION @ EXTERIOR WHEELCHAIR LIFT. WORK Permit Description: Block Wall Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number: B05-00269 Status: FINALED Valuation: $5,100.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: AYRES GROUP 355 BRISTOL ST Date: 9/29/2006 Permit Type: ROOF Description: REROOF OVER 1 (E) LAYER OF CAP SHEET ROOF MATERIALS W/ DUROLAST 40MIL WHITE PVC SINGLE PLY Permit Description: Re -Roof Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number: B06-01642 Status: FINALED Valuation: $86,000.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: CONEX ROOFING COMPANY 4397232-8 Page 5 ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date: 7/26/2004 Permit Type: ROOF Description: TEAR OFF EXISTING. COVER WITH BUILT-UP ROOFING. Permit Description: Re -Roof Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number: B04-01323 Status: FINALED Valuation: $8,100.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: WHITNEY ROOFING Date: 8/12/1999 Permit Type: ALT—COM Description: EXTEND SHOP 120SF INTO UNIT I TO CREATE STORAGE AREA FOR "FRIAR TUX SHOP", CREATE ACCESS T Permit Description: Alter Commercial (T.I.) Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number: B99-01283 Status: FINALED Valuation: $2,500.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: DESIGNED BY R.D SMITH Date: 7/13/1998 Permit Type: ALT—COM Description: TENANT IMPROVEMENT TO ALLOW A HAIR SALON IN AN EXISTING BUILDING. Permit Description: Alter Commercial (T.I.) Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number: B98-01246 Status: FINALED Valuation: $35,000.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: DESIGNED BY R.D SMITH 4397232-8 Page 6 ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS Date: 6/15/1998 Permit Type: ALT—COM Description: LEGALIZING 2 TENANT WALLS (FOR FRIAR TUX) FOR STORAGE AREA. NAD ADD TWO OFFICES"720SF" FR Permit Description: Alter Commercial (T.I.) Work Class: Proposed Use: Permit Number: B98-01028 Status: FINALED Valuation: $1,500.00 Contractor Company: Contractor Name: 4397232-8 Page 7 GLOSSARY General Building Department concepts ■ ICC: The International Code Council. The governing body for the building/development codes used by all jurisdictions who've adopted the ICC guidelines. MOST of the US has done this. Canada, Mexico, and other countries use ICC codes books and guides as well. There are a few states who have added guidelines to the ICC codes to better fit their needs. For example, California has added seismic retrofit requirements for most commercial structures. ■ Building Department (Permitting Authority, Building Codes, Inspections Department, Building and Inspections): This is the department in a jurisdiction where an owner or contractor goes to obtain permits and inspections for building, tearing down, remodeling, adding to, re -roofing, moving or otherwise making changes to any structure, Residential or Commercial. ■ Jurisdiction: This is the geographic area representing the properties over which a Permitting Authority has responsibility. ■ GC: General Contractor. Usually the primary contractor hired for any Residential or Commercial construction work. • Sub: Subordinate contracting companies or subcontractors. Usually a "trades" contractor working for the GC. These contractors generally have an area of expertise in which they are licensed like Plumbing, Electrical, Heating and Air systems, Gas Systems, Pools etc. (called "trades"). ■ Journeymen: Sub contractors who have their own personal licenses in one or more trades and work for different contracting companies, wherever they are needed or there is work. ■ HVAC (Mechanical, Heating & Air companies): HVAC = Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning. ■ ELEC (Electrical, TempPole, TPole, TPower, Temporary Power, Panel, AMP Change, Power Release): Electrical permits can be pulled for many reasons. The most common reason is to increase the AMPs of power in an electrical power panel. This requires a permit in almost every jurisdiction. Other commons reason for Electrical permits is to insert a temporary power pole at a new construction site. Construction requires electricity, and in a new development, power has yet to be run to the lot. The temporary power pole is usually the very first permit pulled for new development. The power is released to the home owner when construction is complete and this sometimes takes the form of a Power Release permit or inspection. ■ "Pull" a permit: To obtain and pay for a building permit. ■ CBO: Chief Building Official • Planning Department: The department in the development process where the building /structural plans are reviewed for their completeness and compliance with building codes ■ Zoning Department: The department in the development process where the site plans are reviewed for their compliance with the regulations associated with the zoning district in which they are situated. • Zoning District: A pre -determined geographic boundary within a jurisdiction where certain types of structures are permitted / prohibited. Examples are Residential structure, Commercial/Retail structures, Industrial/Manufacturing structures etc. Each zoning district has regulations associated with it like the sizes of the lots, the density of the structures on the lots, the number of parking spaces required for certain types of structures on the lots etc. ■ PIN (TMS, GIS ID, Parcel#): Property Identification Number and Tax Map System number. ■ State Card (Business license): A license card issued to a contractor to conduct business. • Building Inspector (Inspector): The inspector is a building department employee that inspects building construction for compliance to codes. • C.O.: Certificate of Occupancy. This is the end of the construction process and designates that the owners now have permission to occupy a structure after its building is complete. Sometimes also referred to as a Certificate of Compliance. GLOSSARY Permit Content Definitions • Permit Number: The alphanumerical designation assigned to a permit for tracking within the building department system. Sometimes the permit number gives clues to its role, e.g. a "PL" prefix may designate a plumbing permit. ■ Description: A field on the permit form that allows the building department to give a brief description of the work being done. More often than not, this is the most important field for EP's to find clues to the prior use(s) of the property. ■ Permit Type: Generally a brief designation of the type of job being done. For example BLDG -RES, BLDG - COM, ELEC, MECH etc. Sample Building Permit Data Date: Nov 09, 2000 Permit Type: Bldg - New Permit Number: 101000000405 Status: Valuation: $1,000,000.00 Contractor Company: OWNER -BUILDER Contractor Name: Description: New one store retail (SAV -ON) with drive-thru pharmacy. Certificate of Occupancy. APPENDIX J PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS ANNE MARIE BROWN Environmental Management Consulting TENANT ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, California Prepared for: SANDERSON J RAY CORPORATION c/o Mr. James Ray, Partner 2699 White Road, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92614 Prepared by: ANNE M. BROWN, R.E.A. Environmental Management Consulting 1979 Port Cardigan Place Newport Beach, California 92660 May, 1997 1979 Port Cardigan Place, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 760-8014 May 12, 1997 Sanderson J Ray Development c/o Mr. James Ray 2699 White Road, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92714 SUBJECT: Tenant Environmental Site Assessment: Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, California Dear Mr. Ray: At your request, I conducted an environmental inspection of the subject property on April 22, 1997. Scott Rimland.and Jeff Searcy, Property Managers with Cardinal Asset Management were interviewed and Mr. Searcy accompanied this consultant during a portion of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to evaluate current environmental conditions at the property. Findings and recommendations contained herein are based on the site visit and information provided by the tenants. FINDINGS • Background The property is occupied by a three building complex currently occupied by sixteen (16) tenants, including the Cardinal Asset Management office. One unit is current vacant. The complex is largely occupied by automotive repair and related service businesses. According to Mr. Rimland, the complex is approximately nine years old, and the site was previously occupied by an Avis vehicle maintenance facility. Prior to the site visit, each tenant was provided with a Hazardous Materials Survey Form 1 to complete, nowever, omy a rew or the tenants actually compietea the Corm. 1 Consequently, this consultant completed the most of the forms during the tenant interviews, which were relatively short since many of the tenants were reluctant to spend i much time during their busy workday. Completed survey forms are included in the Appendix of this report for fourteen (14) tenants. Since they do not use or store I D hazardous materials, a survey form was not completed for Cardinal Asset Management or for Imari Sushi, a Japanese Restaurant, although these tenants are addressed otherwise in this report. • Storage of Hazardous Materials All of the automotive and servicing businesses use and store vehicle maintenance chemicals, including lubrication oils, antifreeze, transmission and brake fluids, and various cleaners. When not in use, small volume materials are typically stored on shelves or cabinets inside each of the unit. Larger volume materials such as oil are stored in 55 gallon drums or above ground tanks usually containing about 200 gallons. Additionally, most of the shops have a solvent parts washer containing up to 20 gallons of solvent. In no case was secondary containment provided beneath the solvent bath units (See Site Photo #3, #7 & #8 in the Appendix of this report). Ding King performs dent removal, windshield repair and paint touch-up in the units they occupy. Ding King stores several gallons of solvent based paint in unit 45, where they perform paint touch-up (See Site Photo #1 in the Appendix of this report). Jiffy Lube, a tenant which performs automotive oil changes and fluid maintenance stores considerably more oil and antifreeze than the average tenant in the complex. Jiffy Lube has a total of 10 above ground tanks, 9 containing oil ranging from 120 to 350 gallons in size. They also have one 200 gallon antifreeze tank. All of these materials are stored inside the building, largely in a subterranean, concrete lined basement where workers labor on autos parked overhead (See Site Photo #5 in the Appendix of this report). Jiffy Lube's chemicals appeared to be safely stored and housekeeping was good. • Underground Storage/Containment/Monitoring Wells No underground storage tanks, or sumps were observed on the property. Most of the units have a floor drain, and the western portion of the main building has a trench covered with a metal grate which exists at the rear of the units. The trench drains to a three stage clarifier located west of the main building. According to Mr. Searcy, the clarifier is cleaned out about once a year. Mr. Searcy and Mr. Rimland were queried about whether a monitoring well currently exists on the property. Mr. Rimland indicated that he understood that one may have been on the property from a past use, however, he is not aware of the location of any monitoring well on the property at the current time, nor is he aware of a well being periodically sampled. No evidence of a monitoring well was observed on the property during the site visit. 2 • Chemical Spills and Releases At the time of the site visit, no significant hazardous substances spills or releases were observed on the property. For the most part, housekeeping in the various tenant spaces appeared to be good, although some relatively minor oil and other fluid stains were observed on the concrete slab floor in many of the units. In Unit #45 where Ding King performs paint touch-up, there were noticeable paint stains and overspray on the floor and walls (See Site Photo #1 in the Appendix of this report). According to Mr. Searcy, on occasion he has found some of the tenants working on vehicles in the driveway to the rear of their units. He stated that the tenants are aware they are not to be working in this area. Some minor stains were observed on asphalt paving to the rear of some of the units in the main building (See Site Photo 92 in the Appendix of this report). • Hazardous Waste Management All of the automotive repair/servicing tenants generate hazardous waste in the form of waste oils, coolant, oil filters, batteries and other related materials. With the exception of Jiffy Lube all of the tenants provide 55 -gallon drums in their units for the purpose of waste collection. Jiffy Lube has a 2000 gallon tank in their basement for the collection and storage of waste oil (See Site Photo 94 in the Appendix of this report). In addition, Jiffy Lube stores waste oil filters in 55 -gallon drums in a shed to the rear of the property (See Site Photo 46 in the Appendix of this report). The interior of this shed was quite an oily mess, but since the base was a concrete slab, no apparent environmental risk was noted. Should Jiffy Lube move from the premises in the future, this area will require some cleanup. All of the tenants indicated that they use various haulers for collection of their hazardous wastes for off-site recycle and disposal. No overly extensive build up of hazardous waste was observed on the property at the time of the site visit. Two different waste haulers were observed on the property during the site visit day. Imari Sushi stores their waste grease in a container behind the shop. The asphalt in the immediate area was covered with a grease residue creating a potential health & safety problem. Mr. Searcy stated that on occasion waste drums and batteries have been dropped off on the property, sometimes near the dumpsters. He then takes care of disposal of these drums via a company called All Phase Environmental. 3 s Wastewater Treatment/Discharge Nearly all of the auto servicing tenants create a contaminated mop wash water which is the result of washing the service area floors. Those tenants connected to the trench/clarifier system discharge mop water into the trench. Some of the other tenants indicated that they discharge their mop water into the clarifier system, while others either discharge into their sink or floor drain. • Air Discharges None of the current tenants operate equipment requiring a permit to operate from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The growth in the paint touch-up business that Ding King is experiencing appears to be leading to the necessity of installing a filtered paint booth. Currently, Ding King is using Unit #45 itself as a paint booth which now appears to present a potential contamination problem for the unit as well potential health/safety problems for users and possibly other tenants. • Hazardous Materials Disclosures Based on the quantities of hazardous materials used and stored in their operations, all of the automotive repair/servicing tenants are required to prepare a Hazardous Materials Emergency Business Plan for the local fire department. Although many of the tenants did not have a copy of their plan immediately available for review, all of them stated that they have provided whatever was necessary to the Costa Mesa Fire Department. • Enforcement Actions, Complaints According to the various tenants, none have been the subject of any enforcement actions or complaints. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 1. According to Mr. Searcy, the clarifier is cleaned out about once a year. In order to keep the system operating properly, it is recommended that the clarifier be put on a biannual cleanout program. 2. Secondary containment has not been provided beneath the solvent baths in the auto servicing units. Stains were observed on the floor beneath each of these units, and over time, this could create an environmental contamination problem since some solvents can penetrate through unsealed concrete slabs, and/or find pathways to underlying soil via cracks. It is recommended that all tenants with solvent baths provide secondary containment such as a plastic spill pan. These pans are readily available through Safety Supply companies. 4 J E 3. To ensure that tenants and others are aware that hazardous wastes are not to be disposed of in or around the dumpsters, it is recommended that the property manager post signs stating NO WASTE CHEMICAL OR BATTERY DISPOSAL ALLOWED on each of the dumpster enclosures. 4. Mop water from those tenants not connected to the trench/clarifier system is discharged into sinks or floor drains. Since this water could contain significant quantities of oil and other debris, this practice over time could result in clogged drains. It is recommended that a means of discharging this water into the clarifier system be provided. This way, oily residues and debris can be collected before discharge to the sewer system. 5. Imari Sushi stores their waste grease in a container behind the shop. The asphalt in the immediate area was covered with a grease residue creating both a potential health & safety problem. It is recommended that secondary containment be provided beneath the grease container and grease spills be cleaned up on a routine basis. 6. Ding King is using Unit #45 itself as a paint booth which appears to present a potential contamination problem for the unit as well potential health/safety problems for users and possibly other tenants. It is recommended that Ding King contact the South Coast Air Quality Management District concerning the necessity of installing and operating a controlled paint booth. 7. No evidence of a monitoring well was observed on the property during the site visit. If the owner is aware of a monitoring well on the property, it should be determined if the well is still necessary. If not, it is recommended that the well be removed, preferably by the company that installed the well. 00000 My professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable environmental assessors practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made as to the professional advice included in this report. This report has been prepared for Sanderson J Ray Corporation use concerning the subject property and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or other uses. Unknown and or unseen conditions may exist at the subject site. No liability for direct or consequential loss or damage is assumed by this consultant resulting from use of the information or recommendations contained herein. Acceptance of or reliance upon submitted recommendations and/or suggestions in no way assures elimination of present or future liability or the fulfillment of any obligations as may be required by any local, state or federal laws or any modifications or changes thereto. 5 D Should there be any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 760-8014. Very truly yours, Anne M. Brown, Registered Environmental Assessor #201 31 I I APPENDIX I I F I MAPS & ILLUSTRATIONS 11 I SITE PLAN 37S Bristol Street * Costa Mesa, C, Suite 90 1,850 SF Autocare Suite 135 Sr'()0 1,8 ': S 00 13cnz & glearner 5040. 80 1,2()() SF First Choice Tran sm im ion 600 $F Ding King Storage Suite 60 698 51' Newport Acv,.,,torim Suite 65 Suite 1 Aura SF p, Or uMtoplex Sidle 55 - 960 SF wired for Sound Suite 50. 1,200 SF Cardinal Developmunt Suite 45 - 1,200 SP Ding King Suite. 40 - 1,200 SF Imari Swhi ,Suite 30 - 4,298 SF California Coventry Suite 20 - 1,920 SF Nationwide Cellular Suite 15 - 1,920 SF Rent A Wreck Suite 10 - 2,480 SF AVAILABLE Suite 95 Suite 100 2,400 SF 1,800 SF Suite I OS First Cll(-)ire California�'l � 4,350 SF "Utornobile , 8fAkt., Works s Tires Warehouse Suite 90 1,850 SF Autocare Suite 135 Sr'()0 1,8 ': S 00 13cnz & glearner 5040. 80 1,2()() SF First Choice Tran sm im ion 600 $F Ding King Storage Suite 60 698 51' Newport Acv,.,,torim Suite 65 Suite 1 Aura SF p, Or uMtoplex Sidle 55 - 960 SF wired for Sound Suite 50. 1,200 SF Cardinal Developmunt Suite 45 - 1,200 SP Ding King Suite. 40 - 1,200 SF Imari Swhi ,Suite 30 - 4,298 SF California Coventry Suite 20 - 1,920 SF Nationwide Cellular Suite 15 - 1,920 SF Rent A Wreck Suite 10 - 2,480 SF AVAILABLE f BRI -37585 •NEW BENZ AND BEAMER 04/01/93 08/31/98 Q 18110 BRI -37590 AUTOCARE EXPRESSS 05/01/93 04/30/98 0 1850 BRI-37595-fIRST CHOICE AUTOMOTIVE 07101/96 04/30/00 0 2450 Total Bui t4ir.V: 36,337 0 BRI -37581 CALIFORNIA BRAKE WORKS 03/15/94 03/14/97 0 1800 BRI -37505 AMER I CAN TIRE Ar SERVICE CO. 08/26/96 08131 /06 0 4350 . BRi-37511 ORANGE COUNTY LUBE CENTERS 05/06/88 05/04/09 0 2354 ]t BRI.37520 NAT i tN W I DE CELLULAR SERVICES 07/01196 0+6/30/99 O 1920 BRI -37525 DING KING STORAGE 05/01/96 05/02196 €1 603 a 09I-37530 SOUTHWEST LEASING A RENTAL INC 05/20/88 12/31/97 0 42% BRI -37540 [MARI SUSHI 01115/96 01/!4/01 0 1200 BRI -37545 THE DING KING 02101/96 01/31/01 0 1200 BRI -37550 -GAf94 At-0eVELOPP1ENT 043/ 40- JW25/92 0 1 BRI -37555 WIRED FOR SOUND 44/15/96 04/14/98 0 960 BRI -37560 NEWPORT ACCESSORIES AND PARTS 11/01/93 04/30/96 0 6919 <` BRI -37565 DR. AUTOPLEX 10/01/96 09/30/98 O 1024 BRI -37570 ADVANCED EURO CARS 09/01/93 08/31/98 O 1950 BRI -37575 SADDLEBACK AUTOMOTIVE 09/D1 /93 08/31/98 O 3CW0 BRI -37580 'FIRST CHOICE AUTOMOTIVE VV' 12/01/96 11/30/99 0 1200 BRI -37585 •NEW BENZ AND BEAMER 04/01/93 08/31/98 Q 18110 BRI -37590 AUTOCARE EXPRESSS 05/01/93 04/30/98 0 1850 BRI-37595-fIRST CHOICE AUTOMOTIVE 07101/96 04/30/00 0 2450 Total Bui t4ir.V: 36,337 0 SITE PIIOTOS SITE PHOTO KEY Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, California April 22, 1997 1. Interior of Ding King Training Facility Unit -note paint storage and residue on floor 2. Rear of building behind Ding King Training Facility Unit, note stains on asphalt paving 3. Parts washer, rear of California Coventry, Unit 30 4. Vehicle maintenance chemical storage and waste oil tote, basement of Jiffy Lube 5. View of Jiffy Lube basement, shows new oil tanks and work area 6. Interior of Jiffy Lube's waste storage shed, rear of property, shows waste oil filter drums 7. Solvent parts washer in Unit 100, California Brake Works 8. Solvent parts washer in First Choice Automotive, Unit 95, note stains on floor F, I I I C, I 4t -71t BRISTOL AUTOPI EX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company: 4AVa\LO-A &'Xe -o C.CLV-s Check all that apply: Tenant Contractor ( ) Prospective ( ) Existing Mailing Address: 31`S --6 v—�S kn\ -f> "e a-e..V �DS � f - . Cc, 9 2..0 2.(-c Contact Person & Title: C)SC.gQ, Telephone Number: (Ata) 5Lvo- "L\ 11 Current TCC Tenants(s): 11 Address of Leased Premises: �,Ja kk L—, Length of Lease or Contract Term: 1 Q Q Z Prospective TCC Tenants (s): Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Current Operations: Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material" means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Yes ( ) No Radioactive Materials Yes ( ) No Petroleum Products Yes No ( ) 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). Hazardous Materials Location and Method of Storaz,ei�.�- uanti 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises? Yes(.) No M If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. 1-1 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storage Prior to Disposal uanti �� 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal will take place. Hazardous Waste' n Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method V t .. A +. 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes ( ) No V) If yes, please describe arty existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -3- 4. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the premises? Yes ( ) No M If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes ( ) No (.V If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes ( ) No If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMENUDISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: storm drain? sewer? surface water? no industrial discharge g 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? Yes ( ) No ( ) �r If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. n�v -4- F, 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes ( ) No M 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes ( ) No 00 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given time? Yes ( ) No ( ) 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes 4 No ( ) N) If so, attach a copy. oj�,-y GL aQ4 6c, 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes (A No If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes (;�) No ( ) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 8. ANIMAL TESTING 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes ( ) No W If so, describe the activity. 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No N If so, describe the activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS, COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No M If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint, or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No N 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or activities on premises occupied by you? Yes ( ) No X H 0 BRISTOL AU"COPLEX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. { Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. I. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company: 1 i" Ca.2-¢._ E)<ee c -SS Check all that apply: TenantContractor ( Prospective ( ) Existing ( X ) Mailing Address: 'J S r'C�(L�S�� `Erk- .uQ, A.k q0 kl-tsaf. ' - 9212 2.xx Contact Person & Title: Q:)ay i c� l,� Ge IV— CSL, Telephone Number: (i I� crjc, - (,DU W Current TCC Tenants(s): Address of Leased Premises: Length of Lease or Contract Term: Prospective TCC Tenants (s): Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Current Operations: K Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including . principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. �'�7?Pet 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material" means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Yes ( ) No Radioactive Materials Yes ( ) No Petroleum Products Yes �2) No ) 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored the quantities that will be on-site at any given bottles in storage close t Hazardous Materials time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., on the premises). Location and Method of Storage rotor©2 c 7-cy71f( "mE �'l�j�sv✓//i!�> .5�� 1-c-�Y'Y �%�!�/Zd (/`c.~,�7 Cr�.t��17/`/N66>t �i�71/�C1!?E7'O/Z C'Lt'�91v�"J� _�j-��Ziyf' G�i✓� /'X,131'/ c 13o rrz e- s uanti /Oy Cr�� /-s- le, / cwr. Z %�orTl�S 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premisesT Yes(.) No (�} If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. -2- 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storage Prior to Disposal U'Z� /tll�lz�it G'/�1'lty SnY7,9E;•6- 7Jl7t�K uantit 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal will take place. Hazardous Waste Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method U /X%rCw c5/4- A�rzl-,E" !tai l' r 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes ( ) No V) If yes, please describe any existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -3- 4• SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the premises? Yes ( ) No If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes ( ) No If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes ( } No,�} If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMENT/DISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: A/O storm drain? sewer? surface water? _ no industrial discharge 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? g /t1�f� Yes ( ) No ( ) If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company I//, -Y with respect to its operations on the premises. - -4- 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes ( ) No (- 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes ( ) No 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given time? Yes (-A No ( ) r170;rV/2 C/L /Oca C-�i�f L 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes (.7}- No () (���� lk_a4 If so, attach a copy. fL o U(. < 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes (-A No ( ) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? �2c)iV T Z4��6 tc/ Yes," No( ) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. g -5- 8. ANIMAL TESTING ` 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No 0 If so, describe the activity. 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto the premises for research or development purposes? 7f-IfYes ( ) No (74- If so, describe the activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS, COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes( ) No If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint, or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health -and safety? Yes( ) No { + 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or activities on premises occupied by you? Yes ( ) No �+ In W AGENCY PARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE&CONT.90L P Street. 41h F1w PETE Box 806 This EPA ID Number must be used forall, manifesting, recor" '77 and:',.repo" Please retain this notice in your files..," annnta. CA 96812 0808 0� 'k Dep,,nt of To'xic,suC90M.I. Haiaid�us Waste Manag'rogm Date:- i, TelepbQue: (916) 324-1�_p Cal" Only TqP;- _r (800) ¢l P, Operator's Initials, 2: oft, tip ffik. EPA ID (iC�-�� �xi� Location Ad j 0 it RAq RD;�,D,O��, "TI EST �x V PERMANENT CALIFQ WU 'z This is to acknowledge that a permanent California EnvironmepWTr, ection Age!g24le ,p��ification' (EPA ID) Number has been assigned tp,.,,place of business.' note EPA:l abovj- the location address.) kV 71nV An EPA ID Number is assigned to a person or business at a location and person. or'business t4J'wh*1;,4$ was ass W*e generation sites, each site: must have, ifyou :stop the type or amount of waste you havAe;,m6ve your busini notify the Department of Toxic Substances. C ontrol Immed your EPA ID Number must be cs%ge new location. "ifyou contlnae.toproduceli Q waste. W -kqk, Jtis: o U .A busin I ;1 7 your EN This EPA ID Number must be used forall, manifesting, recor" '77 and:',.repo" Please retain this notice in your files..," 0� 'k Dep,,nt of To'xic,suC90M.I. Haiaid�us Waste Manag'rogm GenerAt,Qr Information S, U .,�e M11 CCA,4111 IU i, TelepbQue: (916) 324-1�_p Cal" Only TqP;- _r (800) ¢l P, Operator's Initials, 2: EN 0� S ...... 1.2 2: tip r a 'yC�gPORAtEO �9y CALIFORNIA 92828-1200 PQ BOD( 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COSTA MESA FIRE DEPARTMENT UNIFORM FIRE CODE PERMIT Auto Care Express 375 BRISTOL ST 90 Costa Mesa CA. 92626 Issue Date 12/01/96 Expiration Date 12/31/97 Business Address: 375 BRISTOL ST 90 Permit Description: TO STORE, HANDLE, AND USE FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS AND TO OPERATE A REPAIR GARAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLES 79 AND 29 OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1994 EDITION. Issued by: Station: 5 Shift: C This permit must be posted conspicuously on the designated premises or equipment. It is not a sferable. For renewal, contact the Fir evention Bureau at (714) 754-5128. Signature :Date: (�_ t 3'-`� 77 FAIR DRIVE • (714) 7545128 ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AGENCY R9� ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION 2009 EAST EDINGER AVENUE SANTA ANA, CA 92705-4720 1F0g (714) 667-3700 - (714) 972-0749 FAX HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTINGENCY PLAN PAGE 1 OF 2 1. Facility Information 2. Facility Name: 74��� /f UTd t4&E' Address: _ 325 S• ,�l�iS%'OG ST. 9D City:�S`r�9 /l'l�`5A Zip: 224g. g5 Telephone: Fax: 2W 979 - V,34 -e'7 Employee Responses to Emergencies: Fz� 3. Type of Communication �1 Yee-T"�'GL ;ai4/z System: t/�— 7/�;e 1/6-"alxx /S`Ortr� -11-7/y 155-6 46-3o 4. Emergency Coordinator, Primary: Name: V/}w &R0* �'1 R • Address: 375 -:5�• 57 -- 7 -Telephone: Telephone: , /:� 9'2 9- �o30 Fax: Z/L q-79- 93 `7 5. Emergency Coordinator, Alternates: Name: Address: Telephone: Name: Address: Telephone: 6. List of Emergency Equipment: Contingency Plan Revised: January 11, 1995 7 RANGE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION 2009 EAST EDINGER AVENUE SANTA ANA, CA 92705-4720 (714) 667-3700 - (714) 972-0749 FAX HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTINGENCY PLAN -- PAGE 2 OF 2 7. State Office of Emergency Services: 1-800-852-7550 or 1-916-427-4341. 8. Emergency Contacts: Police Department: Name: Address: Telephone: Fire Department: Name: Address: Telephone: Hospital: Name: > _ 11Z A05, P. Address: 349/ Azz-31 Telephone: 71e2l Fax: Contractors: . �R � 1. Name: Address: _ Telephone: L3/a5-3 7- %/e;n Fax: Name: Address: Telephone: Fax: 9. Attach the Following (check when bompleted): A. Facility plot plan 0 B. Evacuation plan �I C. Employee training records U Contingency Plan Revised: January 11, 1995 7. It BRISTOL AUTOPLEX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company:!''�� Check all that apply: Tenant O Contractor ( ) Prospective ( ) Existing (K ) Mailing Address: Contact Person & Title: Telephone Number: ( ) LO& Current TCC Tenants(s): Address of Leased Premises: Length of Lease or Contract Term: / o Prospective TCC Tenants (s): Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Current Operations: [I Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. 1_�a L� z- 14) r�'�Yl� c6 cL� _ ���f�z�C� is fl o 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material" means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes (i`) No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Yes ( ) No Radioactive Materials Yes ( ) No Petroleum Products Yes (,O No ( ) 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). Hazardous Materials Location and Method of Storage l �� .E"rrr�tZ.1S uanti JO T a A L_. - 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises?, Yes ( , ) No V) If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. n�� -2- L J III 0 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storage Prior to Disposal Quantijy 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal will take place. Hazardous Waste Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes ( ) No (0 If yes, please describe any existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -3- �`G1. 4. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the premises? Yes ( ) No ( 0 If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes ( ) No (fl If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes( ) No (X) If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMENTIDISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: storm drain? sewer? surface water? — no industrial discharge h1l c �� J cam- E -Q ��6��/c'k_.7 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? Yes ( ) No If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. - 4- J 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes ( ) No ( A 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes ( ) No 4) 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given tune? Yes (,A No ( ) 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes �) No( ) dyL - C ' v 4C., flt-j2.,� Lc.� If so, attach a copy. 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes W No ( ) If so, describe the procgdures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA. Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes &A No ( ) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. �-v 8. ANIMAL TESTING 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No K If so, describe the activity. 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes ( ) No $`mac If so, describe the activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS, COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes () No If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint, or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes O No 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or activities on.premises occupied by you? Yes () No M -b- I 7 BRISTOL AUTOPLEX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company: Check all that apply: Tenant Contractor ( ) Prospective ( ) Existing (X ) Mailing Address: Contact Person & Title: ;l)<<-I�'- ,, Telephone Number: ( ) �5 S Current TCC Tenants(s): Address of Leased Premises: Length of Lease or Contract Term: Prospective TCC Tenants (s): Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Current Operations: n E Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. 4-')244(c._m-L 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material" means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes ('.xj No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Yes ( ) No Radioactive Materials Yes ( ) No Petroleum Products Yes No ( ) 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). Location and Method Hazardous Materials of Storage uanti ALA (LY Zt- 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises? Yes(.) No (0 If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. -2- 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means anyunder (including orifederalllawf and whichectious risdioactive int intended waste) considered hazardous y to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storage Prior to Disposal uanti jy lit - Q. 01 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal will take place. Hazardous Waste Locationof Disposal Site Disp saI Method LLQ U <. 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes ( ) No If yes, please describe pny existing or proposed treatment methods. 11, U 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -3- l l 4. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the premises? Yes ( ) No o) If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes( ) No (X' If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes ( ) No M I If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMENT/DISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: storm drain? sewer? surface water? no industrial discharge 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? Yes ( ) No If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -4- 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes ( ) No ()) 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes O No 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given time? Yes ( ) No (?C) 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes ( ) No ��x) If so, attach a copy. 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes ( ) No 4,O If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes ( ) No (�) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. -5- ,( 8. ANIMAL TESTING 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No K If so, describe the activity. 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes ( ) No $4 If so, describe the activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS, COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint, or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No ('�q 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or activities on. premises occupied by you? Yes () No M IRS 7 BRISTOL AUTOPLEX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company: Check all that apply: Tenant (C) Contractor ( } Prospective ( ) Existing (.-K)) Mailing Address: Contact Person & Title: r Telephone Number: ( ) S r Current TCC Tenants(s): Address of Leased Premises: Length of Lease or Contract Term: Prospective TCC Tenants (s): Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Current Operations: Il Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. i 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material" means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes ( No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Yes ( ) No Radioactive Materials Yes ( ) No (�c) Petroleum Products Yes (u) No ( ) 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). Location and Method Hazardous Materials of Stora a uanti i 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises? , Yes ( ,) No " If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. Y. -2- 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Hazardous Waste l A Location and Method of Storage Prior to Disposal �,.L.JX, 12--4>te Quantity 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and bow often disposal will take place. Hazardous Waste Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes ( ) No (yj If yes, please describe any existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -3- 4. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the premises? Yes( ) No (� ) If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 5 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes ( ) No " If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes ( ) No ( ) If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. WASTEWATER TREATMENT/DISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: � y, Q_ storm drain? sewer? surface water? _ no industrial discharge 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? Yes ( ) No (x) If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -4- 3 7 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes ( ) No (N) 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes ( ) No 0 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given tune? Yes (�,) No ( ) 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes (V-5 No If so, attach a copy. 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes ( ) No (, ) /t_ �' �t , e-1( /s If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes (��) No ( ) If so describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. -5- D M 8. ANIMAL TESTING 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No K If so, describe the activity. 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes ( ) No $0 If so, describe the activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS, COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint, or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No ('�q 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or activities on. premises occupied by you? Yes( ) No ( M QRISTO L A 1TOP L FEX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company: -TK-Q- Check all that apply: Mailing Address: Tenant —� ) Prospective ( ) Contractor ( } Existing Contact Person & Title:pC.c.-t. - 5 l0a.r1 a-. SUJAa-clk- Telephone Number: (11�}g-16(_- (C(Un p Current TCC Tenants(s): Address of Leased Premises: m 2_., Length of Lease or Contract Term: Prospective TCC Tenants (s): Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Current Operations: 1 Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. pw i 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material" means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. Hazardous Materials F_Q nk - N Location and Method of Storage a;i l M�x�nq N1 �►^Z Quantijy klLgo T,;, r) 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises? Yes (,) No If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. -2- 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Yes O No ( ) Radioactive Materials Yes ( ) No ( ) Petroleum Products Yes ( ) No ( ) _ 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). Hazardous Materials F_Q nk - N Location and Method of Storage a;i l M�x�nq N1 �►^Z Quantijy klLgo T,;, r) 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises? Yes (,) No If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. -2- 0 11 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term ,- "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storage Prior to Disposal uantit , jMA "I VMJE r 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal will take place. Hazardous Waste Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes( ) No If yes, please describe apy existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -3- D d. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the p miser? Yes( ) No If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent ch spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes ( ) No ( ) I f ( A If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes ( ) No ( ) t"/ / IN If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMENT/DISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: storm drain? sewer? surface water? Xno industrial discharge 5.2 Is your industrial wastewa r treated before discharge? Yes( ) No If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -4- 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes( ) No PC 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes( ) Nl� 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. /n//6 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet pf hazardous material at any given time? Yes( ) No 'A 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state r Fire Department requirements? Yes( ) No If so, attach a copy. -5- 0 7.3 Are any of the chemicals tised in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes ( ) No ( ) ? If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes ( ) No If so, desc athe procedures followed to comply with these requirements. -5- 0 n ., 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storage Prior to Disposal Quantijj 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal will take place. Hazardous Waste Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method z 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes ( ) No (� If yes, please describe any existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. Ald _ -3- 4. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the premises? Yes ( ) No (y) If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes ( ) No (/) If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes () No If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMEN'I''(DISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to; storm drain? sewer? surface water? x no industrial discharge 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? Yes () No (__._._ > aLe �e- If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. cq/0 -4- 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes ( ) No (A 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes ( ) No ( Q 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. a(A 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given time? Yes( ) No,(�) 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes ( ) No N If so, attach a copy. 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes ( ) No ( -) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes (\�- No ( ) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. -5- n 8. ANIMAI. TESTING 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No If so, describe the activity. 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No 0 If so, describe the Activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS, COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No " If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint, or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes O No 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or activities on -premises occupied by you? Yes( ) No 111 r 11 BRISTOL. ALITOP FX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (7 14) 760-8014. k L GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company: �� �1 c_Q, 0'�,L �Q Check all that apply: Tenant O Contractor ( } Prospective ( ) Existing Mailing Address: Contact Person & Title: ct Telephone Number: ( ) _ 7-7 "A` Current TCC Tenants(.)- Address of Leased Premises: Length of Lease or Contract Term: Prospective TCC Tenants Lsj. Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Current Operations: Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material" means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). Location and Method Hazardous Materials of Storage uanti 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises? . Yes (:) No If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. jlI //1 -2- 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes t"1 No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Radioactive Materials Petroleum Products Yes ( ) Yes ( ) No' ) No �:. Yes) No ( ) 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). Location and Method Hazardous Materials of Storage uanti 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises? . Yes (:) No If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. jlI //1 -2- 9 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storaze Prior to Disposal Quantit 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal will take place. Hazardous Waste r Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes ( ) No (,�) If yes, please describe any existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. h (Z< -3- 4. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the premises? Yes ( ) No (\/) If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes ( ) No (.�Z). If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes ( ) No (X) If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMENT/DISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: storm drain? sewer? surface water? — no industrial discharge Y-0 Ov X6 Cte 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? Yes O No If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -4- I 7 7 7 7 7 1 1 1 I Ll 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes ( ) No 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes ( ) No (--") 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given time? Yes ( ) No (�,) 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes ( ) No If so, attach a copy. 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes( ) No (1e) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes (I No ( ) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. hl 6(- -5 - t BRISTOL AUTOPLEX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company: i A Ct,-�l nj'_� Lu i ag- W kXICA2, Check all that apply: Tenant '(tee} Contractor ( ) Prospective ( ) Existing ( ) Mailing Address: 22_1 S 13 aAai -off S+P-Q.& , Seat- R-- 2-0 Ctrs--. 01- L COL a 2Q 2s -A 6ce.,.4 Contact Person & Title: Telephone Number: (114) 549 - `1Zcp Current TCC Tenants(s): Address of Leased Premises: SarA L -- Length of Lease or Contract Term: Prospective TCC Tenants (s): Address of Proposed Leased Premises: 4 Address of Current Operations: ti I 8. ANIMAL TESTING 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No Y If so, describe the activity. 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No $0 If so, describe the activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS. COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint, or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or activities on. premises occupied by you? Yes () No M yy no 7 -11MILQ . A LIMPr -.X HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company: So,,c� �.l.c_ VJQr _ 4'-'LAZC�'MCA, � ,- Check all that apply: Tenant Contractor ( ) Prospective ( ) Existing (x ) Mailing Address: 3`lS 'S-�V,�A . Stt'c�.e 'tom Contact Person & Title: A r\.Q-kLW--:� �R-25�r1 Telephone Number: (11t})_Leu? 3$3$ Current TCC Tenants(s): Address of Leased Premises: ',W�.e_ Length of Lease or Contract Term: /ql 2 - Prospective TCC Tenants (s)• Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Current Operations: 0 1 Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material" means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes (p No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Yes ( ) No Radioactive Materials Yes ( ) No Petroleum Products Yes (fit) No ( ) 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). Location and Method Hazardous Materials of Storage 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials conducted on the premises? Yes(,) No V) Quantily proposed or currently If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive f waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storage Prior to Disposal uanti 5 f 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal will take place. Hazardous Waste Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes ( ) No M If yes, please describe ,any existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. 511 4. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the remises? Yes ( ) No If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes ( ) No (_) If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes( ) No , If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMENUDISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: storm drain? sewer? surface water? _ no industrial discharge 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? Yes O No If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -4- I 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes ( ) No (,V) 6.2 Do you operate, any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes () No (x) (�Y / (_- t -1 -IL -4 -t- 6.3 -1-'L-4 �-ll L. C.-c�L %�✓�.rt '2 �1 -C. ��Q . l� . 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given time? Yes (-) No ( ) 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes V) No If so, attach a copy. G� 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes (Q No 7 If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes V) No( ) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. -5- 8. ANIMAL TESTING 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes ( ) No M. If so, describe the activity. 1 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto the lemises for research or development purposes? Yes ( ) No (. If so, describe the activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS. COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes (\'jam No If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint; or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or activities on premises occupied by you? Yes () No (,�) 0 BRIS'T'OL AUTOPLEX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM fi The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Tl e -F- S Name of Responding Company:{YV\ 2csi ►1 ��i3� Check all that apply: Tenant Contractor ( ) Prospective ( ) Existing (x) Mailing Address: "�"��(LIS�D� S� �� , �U t�`Q- tD`Z Cosmo.%c Cra g2lQ2t Contact Person & Title: I..l.a r1.Ci G* iL 0 Telephone Number: ( 1+) r 5 ,r"'LaU& Current TCC Tenants(s): Address of Leased Premises: Sa rA e,_._. Length of Lease or Contract Term: Prospective TCC Tenants (s): Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Cuff ent Operations: D Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. o ---C(.,ti) Lu_,L-� _, T S 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material" means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Yes ( ) No�lq Radioactive Materials Yes ( ) No Petroleum Products Yes ( ) No_ }- 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). Location and Method Hazardous Materials of Storage Quantijy P_Q 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on thh premises?. Yes (.) Noj /`l• If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. -2- 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storage Prior to Disposal Quantily �:o-� ta t :E t .f/a�- 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal. will take place. Hazardous Waste Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes( ) No If yes, please describe apy existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -3- c 4. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on he p emises? Yes( ) No If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes( ) No If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any cle n -u actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes ( ) No If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMENTIDISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: storm drain? sewer? surface water? no industrial discharge 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? Yes( ) NoX* If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -4- 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you haveny air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes (} NoNA 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes( ) No N 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given time? Yes( ) Nor - 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document purspant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes, ) No If so, attach a copy. 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes( ) No x If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes( ) NOY) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 8. ANIMAL TESTING 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or d velopment purposes? Yes( ) NO)4 If so, describe the activity. 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto th pr mises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No If so, describe the activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS. COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes( ) No)< If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint, or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes( ) No 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or act'vities on premises occupied by you? Yes( ) No -6- ..��,:;s-- BRISTOL AUTOP ..X HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY FORM The purpose of this form is to obtain information regarding the use of hazardous substances on the Bristol Autoplex property. Prospective tenants and contractors should answer the questiions in light of their proposed operations on the premises. Existing tenants and contractors should answer the questions as they relate to ongoing operations on the premises and should update any information previously submitted. If additional space is needed to answer the questions, you may attach separate sheets of paper to this form. When completed, the form should be sent to the following address: Cardinal Asset Management Attn: Scott Rimland 375 Bristol Street, Suite 50 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our environmental consultant, Anne Brown at (714) 760-8014. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Responding Company: Wti:.2 1 -4, sal" Check all that apply: Mailing Address: Contact Person & Title: Telephone Number: ( Current TCC Tenants(s): Tenant Contractor ( ) Prospective ( } Existing ( ) . 1 + '" ) 5/6 _� K 7 -3y Address of Leased Premises: Length of Lease or Contract Term: / L� Prospective TCC Tenants (s): Address of Proposed Leased Premises: Address of Current Operations: Describe the proposed operations to take place on the property, including principal products manufactured or services to be conducted. Existing tenants and contractors should describe any proposed changes to ongoing operations. 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous material means any raw material, product or agent considered hazardous under any state or federal law. The term does not include wastes which are intended to be discarded. I Hazardous Materials Location and Method of Storage uanti WA Lwyma-mms- I i 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises? Yes( ) No (h If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. -2- 2.1 Will any hazardous materials be used or stored on site? Chemical Products Yes (k) No ( ) Biological Hazards/ Infectious Yes ( ) No Radioactive Materials Yes ( ) No �) Petroleum Products Yes ( ) No (k) 2.2 List any hazardous materials to be used or stored, the quantities that will be on-site at any given time, and the location and method of storage (e.g., bottles in storage closet on the premises). I Hazardous Materials Location and Method of Storage uanti WA Lwyma-mms- I i 2.3 Is any underground storage of hazardous materials proposed or currently conducted on the premises? Yes( ) No (h If yes, describe the materials to be stored, and the size and construction of the tank. Attach copies of any permits obtained for the underground storage of such substances. -2- 3. HAZARDOUS WASTE For the purposes of this Survey Form, the term "hazardous waste" means any waste (including biological, infectious or radioactive waste) considered hazardous under any state or federal law, and which is intended to be discarded. 3.1 List any hazardous waste generated or to be generated on the premises, and indicate the quantity generated on a monthly basis. Location and Method of Hazardous Waste Storage Prior to Disposal Quantijy 3.2 Describe the method(s) of disposal (including recycling) for each waste. Indicate where and how often disposal will take place. Hazar/dous Waste Location of Disposal Site Disposal Method 3.3 Is any treatment or processing of hazardous, infections or radioactive wastes currently conducted or- proposed to be conducted on the premises? Yes ( ) No (� ) If yes, please describe any existing or proposed treatment methods. 3.4 Attach copies of any hazardous waste permits or licenses .issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -3- 4. SPILLS 4.1 During the past year, have any spills or releases of hazardous materials occurred on the premises? Yes( ) No ( <� If so, please describe the spill and attach the results of any testing conducted to determine the extent of such spills. 4.2 Were any agencies notified in connection with such spills? Yes ( ) No If so, attach copies of any spill reports or other correspondence with regulatory agencies. 4.3 Were any clean-up actions undertaken in connection with the spills? Yes( ) No ,P) If so, briefly describe the actions taken. Attach copies of any clearance letters obtained from any regulatory agencies involved and the results of any final soil or groundwater sampling done upon completion of the clean- up work. 5. WASTEWATER TREATMENT/DISCHARGE 5.1 Do you discharge industrial wastewater to: {'LG"Z/I- storm drain? sewer? surface water? _ no industrial discharge 5.2 Is your industrial wastewater treated before discharge? Yes ( ) No ( ) 1� A If yes, describe the type of treatment conducted. -- 5.3 Attach copies of any wastewater discharge permits issued to your company with respect to its operations on the premises. -4- 6. AIR DISCHARGES 6.1 Do you have any air filtration systems or stacks that discharge into the air? Yes ( ) No V) 6.2 Do you operate any equipment that require air emissions permits? Yes ( ) No V) 6.3 Attach copies of any air discharge permits pertaining to these operations. 7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURES 7.1 Does your company handle an aggregate of at least 500 pounds, 55 gallons or 200 cubic feet of hazardous material at any given time? Yes ( ) No (,/ 7.2 Has your company prepared a Hazardous Materials Disclosure - Chemical Inventory and Business Emergency Plan or similar disclosure document pursuant to state or Fire Department requirements? Yes ( ) No W If so, attach a copy. 7.3 Are any of the chemicals used in your operations regulated under Proposition 65? Yes ( ) No (;r) If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. 7.4 Is your company subject to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Requirements? Yes ( ) No (4 If so, describe the procedures followed to comply with these requirements. -5- 8. ANIMAL TESTING 8.1 Does your company bring or intend to bring live animals onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes( ) No K If so, describe the activity. 8.2 Does your company bring or intend to bring animal body parts or bodily fluids onto the premises for research or development purposes? Yes ( ) No $4 If so, describe the activity. 9. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS, COMPLAINTS 9.1 Has your company ever been subject to any agency enforcement actions, administrative orders, lawsuits, or consent orders/decrees regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes ( ) No 91 If so, describe the actions and any continuing compliance obligations imposed as a result of these actions. 9.2 Has your company ever received any request for information, notice of violation or demand letter, complaint, or inquiry regarding environmental compliance or health and safety? Yes () No 9.3 Has an environmental audit ever been conducted which concerned operations or activities on.premises occupied by you? Yes ( ) No 6A yy 0 APPENDIX K AGENCY DOCUMENTS Excellence 4iM �$nt'ce January 8, 2013 COUNTY OF ORANGE MARK A. REFOWITZ HEALTH CARE AGENCY DIRECTOR DAVID M. SOULELES, MPH PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DEPUTY AGENCY DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RICHARD SANCHEZ, RENS, MPH DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Thompson Fetter T. Fetter & Co. Inc. 2550 Fifth Avenue, Suite 629 San Diego, CA 92103 Subject: Remedial Action Completion Certification Re: Bristol Plaza Chevron 300 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA OCHCA Case #97UT025 Dear Mr. Fetter: MAILING ADDRESS: 1241 E. DYER RD., #120 SANTA ANA, CA 92705-5611 TELEPHONE: (714) 433-6000 FAX: (714) 754-1732 E-MAIL: ehealthAochca.com This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and corrective action for the underground storage tank(s) formerly located at the above-described location. Thank you for your cooperation throughout this investigation. Your willingness and promptness in responding to our inquiries concerning the former underground storage tank(s) are greatly appreciated. Based on information in the above -referenced file and with the provision that the information provided to this Agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, this Agency finds that the site investigation and corrective action carried out at your underground storage tank(s) site is in compliance with the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code and with corrective action regulations adopted pursuant to Section 25299.3 of the Health and Safety Code and that no further action related to the petroleum release(s) at the site is required. This notice is issued pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 25296.10 of the Health and Safety Code. Claims for reimbursement of corrective action costs submitted to the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund more than 365 days after the date of this letter or issuance or activation of the Fund's Letter of Commitment, whichever occurs later, will not be reimbursed unless one of the following exceptions applies: • Claims are submitted pursuant to Section 25299.57, subdivision (k) (reopened UST case); or, Thompson Fetter January 8, 2013 Page 2 • Submission within the timeframe was beyond the claimant's reasonable control, ongoing work is required for closure that will result in the submission of claims beyond that time period, or that under the circumstances of the case, it would be unreasonable or inequitable to impose the 365 -day time period. Please contact Denamarie Baker at (714) 433-6255 if you have any questions regarding this matter. cerely, Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH Director Environmental Health Attachment: Case Closure Summary cc: Carl Bernhardt, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (electronic copy) Larry Honeybourne, Water Quality Section, Environmental Health (electronic copy) UST Cleanup Fund Manger, State Water Resources Control Board (electronic copy) Steven Collins, Centec Engineering, Inc. (electronic copy) Case Closure Summary Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Program I. Agency Information Datp. nrtnhpr 1c) )nl,) Agency Name: Orange County Health Care Agency Address: 1241 E. Dyer Rd., Suite 120 City/State/Zip: Santa Ana, CA 92705 Phone: (714) 433-6255 Responsible staff person: Denamarie Baker Title: Hazardous Waste Specialist II. Case Information Site Facility Name: Bristol Plaza Chevron Site characterization complete? Yes Site Facility Address: 300 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Date approved by oversight agency: GeoTracker Global ID No.: T083003044 Local Case No.: 97UT025 RO No.: R00001621 URF Filing Date: July 25, 1997 Minimum Depth to GW: 8.30' b s p g Maximum Depth to GW: 23.77' bgs Responsible Party: Address Phone No.: T. Fetter & Company, Inc. Thompson Fetter 25505 th Avenue, Suite 629 San Diego, CA 92103 (619) 234-7989 Tank No. Size in Gal. Contents Nearest/affected SW name: NA Closed in- Place/Removed? Date N/A Report(s) on file? Yes Where is report(s) filed? OCHCA office and GeoTracker Treatment and Disposal of Affected Material Material III. Release and Site Characterization Information Cause and type of release: UST system release Site characterization complete? Yes Date approved by oversight agency: March 5, 2011 Monitoring wells installed? Yes Number: 6 Proper screened interval? Yes Minimum Depth to GW: 8.30' b s p g Maximum Depth to GW: 23.77' bgs Flo w direction: southwest Most sensitive current use: Municipal and domestic supply Are drinking water wells affected? No Aquifer name: NA Is surface water affected? No Nearest/affected SW name: NA Off-site beneficial use impacts (addresses/locations): None Report(s) on file? Yes Where is report(s) filed? OCHCA office and GeoTracker Treatment and Disposal of Affected Material Material Amount (include Units) Action (treatment or disposal/destination) Date Groundwater 2,310 gallons Treated by onsite DPE unit 11/14/04-1/14/05 Vapor 888.5 pounds Treated by onsite DPE unit 11/14/04-1/14/05 Groundwater 95,715 gallons Treated by onsite DPE unit 10/27/05-2/9/06 Vapor 18.2 pounds Treated by onsite DPE unit 10/27/05-2/9/06 Groundwater 14,275 gallons Treated by onsite DPE unit 7/13/09-11/13/09 Vapor 373 pounds Treated by onsite DPE unit 7/13/09-11/13/09 This document and the related CASE CLOSURE LETTER, shall be retained by the lead agency as part of the official site file Revised: 1/13/2010 Pagel of 3 Case Closure Summary Leaking Underground Fuel Storage Tank Program Date: October 19, 2012 Case#: 97UT025 III. Release and Site Characterization Information (Continued) This document and the related CASE CLOSURE LETTER, shall be retained by the lead agency as part of the official site file. Revised: 1/13/2010 D-') ,.4'2 Maximum Documented Contaminant Concentrations - - Before and After Cleanup Contaminant Soil (mg/kg) Water (Itg/L) Contaminant Soil (mg/kg) Water (µg/L) Before After Before After Before After Before After TPH (gas) 4,400 11.8 38,000 42 MTBE 64 0.15 37,000 <1.0 Benzene 0.78 0.0015 9.8 <0.5 TBA 21 0.34 300 <10 Toluene 64 0.0019 9.1 <0.5 1,1 Dichloroethene NA 0.005 NA 24.7 Ethylbenzene 69 0.13 <0.5 <0.5 Trichloroethene NA 0.064 NA 237 Xylenes 480 0.36 15.7 <1.0 Naphthalene NA 0.007 NA <2.0 NOTES: NA = not analyzed. 1,1 DCE and TCE detections noted in the table above do not appear to be related to the tanks associated with this site. This site has not been the site of auto maintenance or repair, current and historical use has solely been for vehicle fueling. The source of these contaminants has not been determined. Comments (Depth of Remediation, etc.): The subject site is currently an active retail gasoline station that maintains two USTs, five dispensers and associated product piping. In 1996 and 1997, Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) conducted subsurface investigations during a potential property transaction. As part of the investigations, eight soil borings and three groundwater monitoring wells (MW1, MW2, and MW3) were installed to approximately 45 feet bgs. Based on the results of these investigations, contaminated soil was identified in the vicinity of the northern end of the western pump island. Soil contaminated with TPHg was detected at 20 feet bgs and significantly decreased between 35 feet and 45 feet bgs. Benzene was detected at a maximum concentration 0.78 mg/kg in samples collected at 20 to 30 feet bgs. MTBE was detected between 30 and 45 feet bgs (up to 64 mg/kg). Based on the results of these investigations cleanup case #97UT025 was opened at the site. In August 2000, two soil borings (CB1 and CB2) were advanced to approximately 40 feet bgs using direct push technology. Laboratory analytical results detected concentrations of TPHg and MTBE at 330 mg/kg and 21 mg/kg, respectively, in the sample collected from CB -1 at 5 feet bgs. Concentrations of benzene and TBA at 0.23 mg/kg and 1.3 mg/kg, respectively, were also detected in the soil sample collected from CB1 at 5 feet bgs. These concentrations decreased with depth to 1 mg/kg TPHg and 9 mg/kg MTBE at 35 feet bgs. On April 23, 2002, two additional groundwater monitoring wells (MW4 and MW5) were installed to approximately 45 feet bgs. In April 2003, four air sparge wells, one SVE well and one monitoring well (MW6) were installed at the site. Soil samples collected during the April 2003 drilling activities contained the following maximum concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenates: 4,400 mg/kg TPHg, toluene 64 mg/kg, ethylbenzene 69 mg/kg, xylenes 480 mg/kg, MTBE 32 mg/kg, and TBA 21 mg/kg. With the exception of TPHg, MTBE, and TBA, contaminant concentrations decreased with depth to a total depth of 35 to 39 feet bgs. Additionally, product piping was upgraded during this time. Soil removed during product piping replacement was disposed of independently from this case and documentation was not provided for review. During the construction activities well MW3 was destroyed. In October 2007, two borings (CB -100 and CB -101) were advanced for the collection of hydropunch groundwater samples to provide plume definition to the west of the site. Petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenates were not detected in groundwater samples collected from either of the two borings. Three DPE events were conducted between November 2004 and November 2009. A total of 1,280 pounds of petroleum hydrocarbons and 112,300 gallons of groundwater were extracted during these events. Two additional confirmation soil borings (CB -102 and CB -103) were drilled in the source area near the northern end of the west pump island on January 26, 2012. The borings were extended to 50 feet bgs in order to vertically define impacts previously detected to a maximum depth of 35 feet bgs. Concentrations of MTBE and TBA were This document and the related CASE CLOSURE LETTER, shall be retained by the lead agency as part of the official site file. Revised: 1/13/2010 D-') ,.4'2 Case Closure Summary Leaking Underground Fuel Storage Tank Program Date: October 19, 2012 Case#: 97UT025 only detected in one sail sample collected from CB -103 at 5 feet bgs at concentrations of 0.15 mg/kg and 0.34 mg/kg, respectively. TPHg was detected in soils from boring CB -102-50' at 0.26 mg/kg and from CB -103-5' at 11.8 mg/kg and CB -103-10' at 0.17 mg/kg. CB -103-5' also contained BTEX at concentrations of 0.0015 mg/kg, 0.0019 mg/kg, 0.13 mg/kg, and 0.36 mg/kg, respectively. No other soil samples contained concentrations of any constituent above the laboratory reporting limits. Periodic groundwater monitoring was conducted at the site from December 1996 to January 2011 when groundwater sampling was suspended by the responsible party's consultant in anticipation of the site closure. During the most recent groundwater sampling event TPHg was detected in groundwater samples collected from MW -4 and MW -6 at concentrations of 34.4 and 42 pg/L, respectively. No other constituents of concern were detected in the samples. This site is recommended for closure based on the following: Currently there are no groundwater production wells within 0.5 mile of the site. ♦ Petroleum hydrocarbons concentrations in groundwater are below MCLS and DPH Notification Levels. • Benzene was last detected in the groundwater samples collected from monitoring well MW -9R in May 2009 at a concentration of 1.6 pg/L. The site is an mrating retail gasoline station and no changes In land use are planned. IV. Closure V. Local Agency Representative Data Name: Osman Taban, PG #5986 Signature: ......... Name: Genlece Higgins Slgnature.-QL� Name: Anthony Ma n Signature: VI. RWL2CB Notification 11 Date Submitted to RB: RB Response: Name: Kenneth R, Illlams Signature: `•,• r Title: Geologist Date: 101,YlZo Title: Supervising Hazardous Waste Specialist Date: I O f t q I).,> - Title: Program Manager Date: /p .-` Title: Chief, Pollutant Investigation Section Date: This document and the rolatod CASE CLOSURE LETTER, shall be retained by the lead agency as part of the official site file Revised: 1/13/2010 paap 't (IFA ZO/Z0 39Gd 800M�1 BBZ918LT96 0uil ZTOZ/90/TT APPENDIX L ASTM E 1527-05 USER QUESTIONNAIRE Anaheim • 375 • Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 E 1527 — 13 USER QUESTIONNAIRE (11.) Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site CFR 312.25). Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law? Response: a- (2.) Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded in a registry (40 CFR 312.26(a)(1)(v) and (vi)). Are you aware of any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state or local law? Response: A10 (3.) Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP (40 CFR 312.28). As the user of this ESA do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? Response NO (4.) Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated (40 CFR 312.29). Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? Response: 1 Landowner Liability Protections, or LI -Ps, is the term used to describe the three types of potential defenses to Superfund liability in EPA's Interim Guidance Regarding Criteria Landowners Must Meet in Order to Qualify for Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser, Contiguous Property Owner, or Innocent Landowner Limitations on CERCLA Liability ("Common Elements" Guide) issued on March 6, 2003. 2 P.L. 107-118 Page 2 of 2 (5.) Commonly known • reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40 CFR 312.30). Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example, as user, (a.) Do you know the past uses of the property? Response: AJO (b.) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? Response: /VO (c.) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? Response: A/0 (d.) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property.? Response: &� (6.) The degree of obviousness of the presence of likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination appropriate investigation (40 CFR 312.31). 1 As the user of this ESA, based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? Response: A/0 Respondent Signature: (Z" ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Financially Based, Environmental Solutions December 3, 2015 Sanderson J. Ray Development c/o Walkie Ray 2699 White Road Irvine, CA 92614 RE: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report Bristol Autoplex 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Project Number EMS547 Dear Mr. Ray: Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. (EMS) is pleased to present this Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report (Phase II ESA) for the Bristol Autoplex located at 375 Bristol Street located in the City of Costa Mesa, California (the "site" see attached Figure). The Phase II ESA activities were based on the findings of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I ESA) performed at the site. This investigation was performed in general accordance with EMS' environmental services proposal dated November 9, 2015. EMS was retained by Sanderson on November 13, 2015 to conduct the Phase II ESA. On November 3, 2015 EMS finalized a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the referenced property. The Phase I ESA identified a number of Recognized Environmental Conditions according to ASTM Standard E 1527-13 titled "Standard Practice for Environmental Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process.". The Phase I Site inspection revealed that past and current use of the tenant suites as automotive maintenance and repair shops create a potential for subsurface contamination. In particular, a three -stage clarifier on the Site is used to control discharges from floor drains in many of the tenant suites. EMS did not observe solvents being used for the cleaning of auto parts; however, the Site has been an auto maintenance and repair complex for a number of years and it is possible solvents have been used in the past to clean parts. Staining inside some of the suites and in the rear of the central building of the complex was also a concern for potential subsurface contamination of petroleum products. The small concrete block structure along the rear property boundary was formerly used by Jiffy Lube and was also a concern for shallow subsurface contamination as it was used to store either oil or waste oil. Scope of Work On November 17, 2015 EMS installed 10 borings at the Site and collected soil and soil vapor samples at 5 -foot intervals where it was possible. The collection of soil vapor samples was to include two locations near the clarifier that would reach a depth of 15 feet, but perched groundwater was encountered in the two borings at depths between 10 and 12 feet and probes were only set at depths above the perched groundwater. 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel (949) 679-9500 Fax (949) 679-9501 Mr. Walkie Ray December 3, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Pre -Field Activities On November 13, 2015, Ashley Flores and Anthony Severini with EMS met with Ms. Torrey Chacon and Mr. Scott Rimland of Cardinal Development Company in order to be granted access to the Site and mark boring locations using white paint. EMS contacted Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of 48 hours prior to commencement of field activities to locate subsurface utilities. USA contacted utility owners of record within the Site vicinity and notified them of EMS's intention to conduct a subsurface investigation (USA Ticket No. A53170653). Boring Installation and Sampling Environmental Support Technologies (EST, a subsidiary of EMS) provided the direct -push rig and mobile laboratory required to perform the investigation. EST, under the supervision of EMS advanced two soil borings in front of suites #100 and #105 (13-1 and B-3), one near the former Jiffy Lube building suite #110 (13-2), two on either side of the clarifier (B-4 and 13-5), one in the former Jiffy Lube waste oil storage area (B-6), four along the sewer line trace connecting the interior floor drains to the exterior clarifier on the rear side of suites #70, #75, #80, #85 and #90 (13-7, B-8 and B-9), and one on the rear side of suite #30 which was formerly the Ding King automotive repair location (B-10, see Figure 1 attached). EST used a truck -mounted, GeoProbe direct -push sampling rig to install the borings. One boring B-6 was located inside a small brick structure and due to access limitations EST was unable to use the truck -mounted rig; instead EST used a jackhammer to advance the soil boring. EST advanced all borings to a depth of approximately 5 feet (5') below ground surface (bgs) with the exception of the two borings located next to the clarifier (B-4 and B-5) which were advanced to a depth of 15 feet bgs. The soil borings were advanced using standard direct -push sampling techniques. Soil samples at each location were retrieved from the subsurface in 4 -foot long acetate liners with the exception of B-6 which was collected in a 2 -foot acetate liner. Soil samples were collected at a depth of 5 feet with the exception of the two locations next to the clarifier which had samples collected at 5, 10 and 15 feet. Soil samples were collected from the cores and preserved for volatile organic compound (VOC) chemical analysis in the field according to US EPA Method 5035 (DTSC November 2004 guidance document, Option IA and 1B). The sample containers were labeled, placed in separate plastic bags, logged in a chain of custody document and placed in an ice chest containing bagged ice for temporary cold storage. A copy of the chain -of -custody for soil is attached. All soil samples collected were analyzed by EST for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and VOCs using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260B. Soil Gas Probe Installation and Sampling Following soil sample collection, EST constructed temporary soil gas probes within each borehole for the purpose of performing a soil gas survey. Soil gas probes were placed at depths of 5 feet at all locations with the exception of boring B-5. Probes were to be installed at depths of 5, 10 and 15 feet in probes B-4 and B-5; however, during direct push activities perched groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 10 feet in boring B-4 and 12 feet in boring B-5. The soil gas investigation activities were conducted in general accordance with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC) Advisory - Active Soil Gas Investigations dated July 2015. The soil gas probes were installed using 1/4 -inch NylaflowTM sampling tubing in the 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel (949) 679-9500 Fax (949) 679-9501 Ai'l ,1i7 Mr. Walkie Ray December 3, 2015 Page 3 of 6 subsurface. A clean and new implant filter was placed on the end of the tubing. Approximately 12 inches of clean, graded (# 3), kiln dried, Lonestar Monterey sand was poured around the sample tip to allow for diffusion of soil vapors and 12 inches of dry bentonite was added above the sand pack. The remaining borehole was filled with hydrated bentonite to slightly below grade to perform as a leak proof seal. Prior to soil gas sample collection, a minimum of 120 minutes was allowed to elapse for soil gas probe construction materials to set and equilibrate with the surrounding formation. Soil gas samples were collected by an EST chemist operating an EST mobile laboratory. EST mobile laboratories are certified under the California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program. Purging and sampling was conducted at an extraction rate of approximately 200 milliliters (mL) per minute. Purging was accomplished using a portable sampling pump. Prior to collecting the first soil gas sample during the first sampling event an ambient air sample was collected and analyzed. A shut-in test was also conducted prior to both sampling events, which consists of attaching a magnahelic differential pressure gauge to tubing to ensure there is no pressure drop within the system. A purge volume of three was used at all sampling locations; a single purge volume consists of the filter pack pore volume, gas probe screen volume, and tubing volume. A method and material blank and duplicate quality control samples were collected during the sampling event. During the soil gas sampling a leak test of the probe was performed with 2 -propanol placed near and around the sample train. Detection of 2 - propanol would indicate the intrusion of ambient air into the sampling train. During the sampling event soil gas samples were collected using a 20 mL syringe and were taken directly to the on-site mobile laboratory for analysis. The soil gas samples collected were analyzed for TPHg and VOCs using EPA method 8260B. Laboratory Analytical Results Eleven soil gas samples were collected and analyzed for VOCs and TPHg by EST. Sample results are presented on Table 1. Laboratory analytical reports for soil gas and soil samples are attached. Soil gas sample results presented on Table 1 were compared to adjusted cancer end-point indoor air screening levels (IASLc) for commercial/industrial air as recommended by the DTSC's (Department of Toxic Substances Control) Human and Ecological Risk Office (DTSC/HERO Note 3, May 2015). The cancer end-point IASLs for air are based on the calculation of contaminant intake through inhalation that would produce the probability of a one in one -million (1 X 10-6) excess cancer risk. The IASLc was adjusted for screening soil gas data by using the appropriate attenuation factor described in DTSC's 2011 Guidance for the Evaluation and Mitigation of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air (2011 VIG). According to the 2011 VIG the average attenuation factors for existing and future commercial buildings are 0.001 and 0.0005, respectively. Soil gas samples were collected in the parking area of the property that may be occupied by a future building; therefore, EMS used the future commercial buildings attenuation factor of 0.0005 in calculating the screening levels for each compound detected at the site. Screening levels were calculated by dividing the IASLc in either the DTSC/HERO Note 3 or when it was not available in this document to the EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels (RSL) for Industrial Air by the future commercial building attenuation factor. None of the VOCs detected in soil gas at the site exceeded its respective adjusted screening level (see Table 1). TPHg was detected in sample SV -7 at 120,000 µg/m3. Soil gas sample results for TPHg were compared to the EPA Region 9 RSL for low boiling point aromatic TPH and were adjusted with the 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel (949) 679-9500 Fax (949) 679-9501 Ai",1i7 Mr. Walkie Ray December 3, 2015 Page 4 of 6 future commercial development attenuation factor of 0.0005. TPHg in SV -7 did not exceed the EPA Region 9 RSL adjusted screening level of 2,600,000 µg/m3. EMS collected 14 soil samples using EPA Method 8260B/5035 protocol at depths of 5 feet for B-1, B- 2, B-3, B-6, B-7 and B-8; 5, 10, and 15 feet for B-4 and B-5; and, 3 feet for B-9 and B-10. Soil samples were collected at depths up to 15 feet at locations B-4 and B-5 due to their proximity to the clarifier and samples were collected at 3 feet in borings B-9 and B-10 due to what appeared to be visible staining in the soil at that depth. Soil sample results presented on Table 2 were compared to DTSC/HERO Note 3 cancer end point screening levels for commercial/industrial soil and EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for commercial land use. RSLs are chemical -specific concentrations for individual contaminants in air, drinking water and soil that may warrant further investigation or site cleanup. RSLs have been developed for both commercial/industrial and residential scenarios with residential RSLs being typically lower than commercial/industrial scenarios. The process for derivation of DTSC/HERO Note 3 screening levels is based on the identical computational algorithms used to derive USEPA's RSLs. Procedurally, a series of spreadsheet worksheets were populated with the algorithms, exposure and toxicity factors, and analyte roster used in the USEPA RSL process. DTSC screening levels were derived by populating copies of the aforementioned spreadsheet workbooks with California exposure and toxicity factors, and DTSC-specific methods. The final roster of DTSC screening levels includes only those analytes for which the combination of California -specific exposure and toxicity factors results in a soil or tap water DTSC-SL that is at least three times more stringent than the corresponding USEPA RSL value. None of the detected constituents exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 Regional Screening Level for Commercial Soils. None of the VOCs detected in soil samples exceeded their respective DTSC/HERO Note 3 commercial/industrial screening levels or EPA Region 9 commercial/industrial RSLs. TPHg was detected in borings B-4 at 15 feet and B-5 at 5, 10 and 15 feet. The highest concentration of TPHg was detected in boring B-4 at a concentration of 36,000 micrograms per kilogram (gg/kg). TPHg concentrations were compared to the EPA Region 9 RSL for low boiling point aromatic TPH of 420,000 gg/kg. None of the soil samples collected exceeded the EPA Region RSL for TPHg. Conclusions EMS's review of the sample data for the Phase II sampling event determined that none of the soil gas or soil results exceeded their respective health risk based screening levels. Soil gas results did not detect any chlorinated solvents with the exception of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in sample locations SV -2 and SV -8 at concentrations of 320 and 100 µg/m3, respectively. These results fall well below the DTSC/HERO Note 3 adjusted commercial/industrial screening level of 4,200 gg/m3. Trichloroethylene (TCE) was not detected in any of the soil gas samples collected. TPHg in soil gas was also detected in one sample at sample location SV -7 at a concentration of 120,000 µg/m3. This result was compared to the adjusted EPA Region 9 RSL of 2,600,000 µg/m3 and was found to be well below this screening level. Chlorinated solvents were not detected in soil samples with the exception of PCE and TCE in B-4 at 5 feet at concentrations of 16 and 3.2 µg/kg, respectively. The results fall below the DTSC/HERO Note 3 screening level for PCE of 2,700 µg/kg and EPA Region 9 RSLs for TCE of 6,000 µg/kg. TPHg was not detected in any borings with the exception of B-4 and B-5. Boring B-4 had a concentration of 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel (949) 679-9500 Fax (949) 679-9501 Mr. Walkie Ray December 3, 2015 Page 5 of 6 36,000 gg/kg TPHg at 15 feet. Boring B-5 had concentrations of 240, 400 and 9100 gg/kg of TPHg at depths of 5, 10 and 15 feet, respectively. None of the TPHg concentrations exceeded the EPA Region 9 commercial/industrial RSL of 420,000 gg/kg. During soil sampling of the borings near the clarifier (B-4 and B-5) groundwater was encountered at depths of approximately 10 and 12 feet. According to the Phase I performed for the site, groundwater in the area is at approximately 35 feet below ground surface and was unexpectedly encountered at a much shallower depth. Based on the close proximity of the borings to the clarifier it is a possibility that the clarifier is leaking and the perched groundwater and wet soil encountered are a result of a leak. Although there may be a possibility of the clarifier leaking EMS did not encounter any soil or soil gas that exceeded the DTSC/HERO Note 3 or EPA Region 9 RSLs for VOCs or TPHg. EMS understands the site is undergoing planning for future redevelopment. Based on the soil gas and soil results EMS recommends that the clarifier be removed and any soil that appears to be stained or has a strong odor to be segregated from any of the additional soil removed around the clarifier. A representative sample of the stained/strong odor soil should be collected and analyzed to confirm it is not hazardous and should be disposed of in a proper manner. EMS recommends that a Soil Management Plan (SMP) be developed for the site and used during site demolition and grading. The SMP should specify the process for identifying, segregating, profiling and disposing of any stained/strong odor soil. The SMP should also specify the process for removal and cleanup of the clarifier. If additional regulatory oversight of the clarifier removal is required by planning agencies, a voluntary cleanup agreement can also be entered into with the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) for oversight of the removal of the clarifier. This agreement would provide oversight by the OCHCA during the removal of the clarifier only if additional remediation is warranted beyond what is provided by the SMP. Closing EMS is pleased to present this Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report for the Bristol Autoplex property located at 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, California. Please do not hesitate to call me at (949) 679-9500 with any questions or comments. Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Anthony Severini, P.G. President * r yS�gNAt �F4 r ¢' ANTHOltY f. 4 5�V£fi1�J4 "� 9�F OF CAV* 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel (949) 679-9500 Fax (949) 679-9501 Ai",1i7 Attachments Mr. Walkie Ray December 3, 2015 Page 6 of 6 Figure 1, Site Map with Boring Locations Table 1, Soil Gas Sampling Results for VOCs and TPHg Table 2, Soil Sample Results for VOCs and TPHg Laboratory Report, EST, VOC and TPHg Soil Gas Sampling Results —11/17/15 Laboratory Report, EST, VOC and TPHg Soil Sample Results — 11/17/15 16510 Aston St. Irvine, CA 92606 Tel (949) 679-9500 Fax (949) 679-9501 Ai",1i7 E _• T $ =� 9105 4,30515 F R� L #106 #110 1,800/SF 2.354/SFr L 2.400/SF ■ ■ { j `n #85 #90 11 #R 80 2,400/SF r n � # 751,850�SF 1,26o1sF i 3,000rSF # 70 #60 95CVSF 1 ,7221SF 7 2,160/SF ♦! n �M , 200,5 F l - ! _ !# 40 n•� _ i 1,200ISF u 4,2981SF # 15 3,8405F ! :y #10 .�.. ^� 2,48CUSF C 1 yyir��, J EXPLANATION Boring Locations 0 20 40 Site Map APPROXIMATE SCALE Bristol Autoplex (IN FEET) 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, California Project Number EMS547 Phase II Boring Locations Project Manager I DrafterFigure AS AF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC. Date Financially Based Envi onmenta1 S01Uh0Ds 11/17/15 TABLE 1 SOIL GAS SAMPLING RESULTS FOR VOCs 375 BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA Probe ID Date Depth PCE TCE EB IPB Toluene 1,2,4-TMB m,p-Xyl o -Xyl TPHg (ft) µg/m3 SV -1 11/17/15 5 <100 <100 1901 <500 510 <500 610 160J <50,000 SV -2 11/17/15 5 320 <100 <200 <500 110J <500 1901 <200 <50,000 SV -3 11/17/15 5 <100 <100 1,300 <500 1,800 <500 3,800 1,000 <50,000 SV -4 11/17/15 5 <100 <100 <200 <500 140J <500 160J <200 <50,000 SV -5 11/17/15 5 <100 <100 200 <500 790 130J 710 220 <50,000 10 <100 <100 <200 <500 310J <500 260J <200 <50,000 SV -6 11/17/15 5 <100 <100 <200 250J 120J <500 140J <200 <50,000 SV -7 11/17/15 5 <100 <100 370 <500 530 <500 1,100 250 120,000 SV -8 11/17/15 5 100 <100 480 <500 1,200 <500 1,300 290 <50,000 SV -9 11/17/15 5 <100 <100 230 <500 400J <500 720 180J <50,000 SV -10 11/17/15 5 <100 <100 1,200 <500 2,300 <500 3,300 720 <50,000 QA/QC Eq. Blank 11/17/15 NA <100 <100 <200 <500 <500 <500 <500 <200 <50,000 Material Blank 11/17/15 NA <100 <100 <200 <500 <500 <500 <500 <200 <50,000 SV -1 Dup 11/17/15 5 <100 <100 180J <500 500 <500 570 150J <50,000 Screening Levels EPA Region 9 RSL (Ind) NA NA NA 6,000 9,800 3.6E+06 NA 62,000 880,000 880,000 2.6E+06 DTSC HERO Note 3 (Ind NA NA 4,200 NA NA NA 4.4E+07 NA NA NA NA Notes: gg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter EB = Ethylbenzene m,p-Xyl = meta & para -Xylenes VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds IPB = Isopropylbenzene o -Xyl = ortho-Xylenes PCE = Perchloroethene, also referred to as Tetrachloroethene 1,2,4-TMB = 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene TPHg = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons -gasoline TCE = Trichloroethene J = Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration. EPA Region 9 RSL (Ind) = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Regional Screening Level for Industrial Soil (June 2015) DTSC Hero Note 3 (Ind) = Department of Substance Control - Human and Ecological Risk Office - Recommended Screening Levels for Industrial Soil (May 2015) TPHg Screening Level Based on Low Boiling Point Aromatic TPH (RSL, June 2015) NA = Not Applicable Page 1 of 1 TABLE 2 SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS FOR VOCs 375 BRISTOL STREET COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA Sample ID Sampling Date Depth PCE TCE Benzene CD CM 1,2 -DCA EB IPB Naph n -Prop Toluene 1,1,2,2 -TCA 1,2,4-TMB 1,3,5-TMB Xyl TPHg (ft) µg/kg B-1 11/1715 5 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <12 <200 B-2 11/17/15 5 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <15 <250 B-3 1 11/17/15 5 1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <12 <210 B-4 11/17/15 5 16 3.2 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <15 <250 10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <15 <250 15 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6.1 11 2.3J <5.0 <15 36,000 B-5 11/17/15 5 <4.5 <4.5 9.7 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 13 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <14 240 10 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <7.3 <22 400 15 <7.5 <7.5 740 130 15 12 170 0.72J 67 27 1,200 <7.5 130 55 1 470 9,100 B-6 11/17/15 5 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <4.1 <12 <200 B-7 11/17/15 5 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <15 <250 B-8 11/17/15 5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <14 <230 B-9 11/17/15 3 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <5.7 <17 <280 B-10 1 11/17/15 1 3 <5.0 <5.0 6.4 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 8.3 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 1 <15 1 <250 Screening Levels EPA Region 9 RSL (Ind) 1100,0001 6,0001 5,100 1 ###### 1460,0001 2,000 125,0001 ###### 117,0001 ###### I 4.7E+07 1 8,800 1 240,000 1 1.2E+07 I ###### 1420,000 DTSC HERO Note 3 (Ind) 1 2,700 1 NA 1 1,400 1 NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA 15.4E+061 NA I NA I 1.1E+06 I NA I NA Notes: Only Detected Constituents are Listed Xyl = Xylenes ft = feet TPHg = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Gasoline Range Organics ug/kg = micrograms per kilogram J = Detected but Below the Reporting Limit; Therefore, Result is an Estimated Concentration PCE = Tetrachloroethene (also referred to as Perchloroethene) EPA Region 9 RSL (Ind) = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Regional Screening Level for Industrial Soil (June 2015) TCE = Trichloroethene DTSC Hero Note 3 (Ind) = Department of Substance Control - Human and Ecological Risk Office - Recommended Screening Levels for Industrial Soil (May 20 15) CD = Carbon Disulfide TPHg Soil Screening Level Based on Low Boiling Point Aromatic TPH (RSL, June 2015) CM = Chloromethane NA = Not Applicable 1,2 -DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane EB = Ehtylbenzene IPB = Isopropylbenzene Naph = Naphthalene 1,1,2,2 -TCA = 1,1,2,2 -Trichloroethane 1,2,4-TMB = 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-TMB = 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene November 18, 2015 Mr. Anthony F. Severini Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. 16510 Aston Street Irvine, California 92606 RE: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. Enclosed are the results of analyses for soil gas samples received by Environmental Support Technologies laboratory on 11/17/15 16:06. The analyses were performed according to the prescribed method as outlined by EPA 8260B. A shut in test was performed, leak test was performed, equipment blank was run, and selected purge volume was 3PV. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact Project Manager. Sincerely, Os61T rF�ores Ashley Flores Project Manager Environmental Support Technologies laboratories are certified by the California Department of Health Services (CDHS), Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) No's. 2772, 2773, and 2767. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 1 of 35 ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Analyzed Equipment Blank 4K51701-01 Air 17 -Nov -15 09:05 17 -Nov -15 09:20 Material Blank 4K51701-02 Air 17 -Nov -15 09:35 17 -Nov -15 09:49 SV1-5 3PV 4K51701-03 Air 17 -Nov -1510:05 17 -Nov -1510:19 SV3-5 3PV 4K51701-04 Air 17 -Nov -15 11:05 17 -Nov -1511:17 SV7-5 3PV 4K51701-05 Air 17 -Nov -1511:35 17 -Nov -1511:45 SV8-5 3PV 4K51701-06 Air 17 -Nov -15 12:00 17 -Nov -15 12:14 SV9-5 3PV 4K51701-07 Air 17 -Nov -15 12:30 17 -Nov -15 12:43 SV10-5 3PV 4K51701-08 Air 17 -Nov -1512:55 17 -Nov -1513:11 SV2-5 3PV 4K51701-09 Air 17 -Nov -15 13:25 17 -Nov -15 13:40 SV6-5 3PV 4K51701-10 Air 17 -Nov -1513:55 17 -Nov -1514:09 SV5-5 3PV 4K51701-11 Air 17 -Nov -15 14:25 17 -Nov -15 14:37 SV5-10 3PV 4K51701-12 Air 17 -Nov -15 14:55 17 -Nov -15 15:06 SV4-5 3PV 4K51701-13 Air 17 -Nov -15 15:25 17 -Nov -15 15:35 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 1 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes Equipment Blank (4K51701-01) Air Sampled: 11/17/15 09:05 Analyzed: 11/17/15 09:20 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 " 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 " 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 " 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 " 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 " Carbon disulfide ND 500 " Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 " Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 Chloroform ND 200 Chloromethane ND 500 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 2 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes Equipment Blank (4K51701-01) Air Sampled: 11/17/1509:05 Analyzed: 11/17/1509:20 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene ND 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes ND 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene ND 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene ND 500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 108% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 98.5% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 3 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes Material Blank (4K51701-02) Air Sampled: 11/17/15 09:35 Analyzed: 11/17/15 09:49 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 4 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes Material Blank (4K51701-02) Air Sampled: 11/17/15 09:35 Analyzed: 11/17/15 09:49 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene ND 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes ND 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene ND 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene ND 500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 104% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 97.9% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 5 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV1-5 3PV (4K51701-03) Air Sampled: 11/17/1510:05 Analyzed: 11/17/1510:19 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 6 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV1-5 3PV (4K51701-03) Air Sampled: 11/17/1510:05 Analyzed: 11/17/1510:19 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene 190 200 J Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 610 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene 160 200 J p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene 510 500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 105% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 98.2% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 7 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV3-5 3PV (4K51701-04) Air Sampled: 11/17/1511:05 Analyzed: 11/17/1511:17 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 8 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV3-5 3PV (4K51701-04) Air Sampled: 11/17/1511:05 Analyzed: 11/17/1511:17 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene 1300 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 3800 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene 1000 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene 1800 500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 103% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 97.2% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 9 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV7-5 3PV (4K51701-05) Air Sampled: 11/17/1511:35 Analyzed: 11/17/1511:45 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 10 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV7-5 3PV (4K51701-05) Air Sampled: 11/17/1511:35 Analyzed: 11/17/1511:45 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene 370 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 1100 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene 250 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene 530 500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 105% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 97.9% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 120000 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 11 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV8-5 3PV (4K51701-06) Air Sampled: 11/17/1512:00 Analyzed: 11/17/1512:14 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 12 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV8-5 3PV (4K51701-06) Air Sampled: 11/17/1512:00 Analyzed: 11/17/1512:14 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene 480 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 1300 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene 290 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene 100 100 Toluene 1200 500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 105% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 97.4% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 967% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 13 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV9-5 3PV (4K51701-07) Air Sampled: 11/17/1512:30 Analyzed: 11/17/1512:43 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 14 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV9-5 3PV (4K51701-07) Air Sampled: 11/17/1512:30 Analyzed: 11/17/1512:43 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene 230 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 720 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene 180 200 J p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene 400 500 J trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 106% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 99.1% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.3% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 15 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV10-5 3PV (4K51701-08) Air Sampled: 11/17/15 12:55 Analyzed: 11/17/1513:11 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 16 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV10-5 3PV (4K51701-08) Air Sampled: 11/17/15 12:55 Analyzed: 11/17/15 13:11 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene 1200 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 3300 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene 720 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene 2300 500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 105% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 98.0% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.1% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 17 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV2-5 3PV (4K51701-09) Air Sampled: 11/17/1513:25 Analyzed: 11/17/1513:40 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 18 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV2-5 3PV (4K51701-09) Air Sampled: 11/17/1513:25 Analyzed: 11/17/1513:40 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene ND 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 190 500 J Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene ND 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene 320 100 Toluene 110 500 J trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 110% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 97.4% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 97.8% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 19 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV6-5 3PV (4K51701-10) Air Sampled: 11/17/1513:55 Analyzed: 11/17/1514:09 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 20 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV6-5 3PV (4K51701-10) Air Sampled: 11/17/1513:55 Analyzed: 11/17/1514:09 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene ND 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene 250 500 J meta- and para -Xylenes 140 500 J Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene ND 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene 120 500 J trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 107% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 99.6% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.2% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 21 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV5-5 3PV (4K51701-11) Air Sampled: 11/17/1514:25 Analyzed: 11/17/1514:37 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 130 500 J 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 22 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV5-5 3PV (4K51701-11) Air Sampled: 11/17/1514:25 Analyzed: 11/17/1514:37 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene 200 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 710 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene 220 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene 790 500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 104% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 102% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.8% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 23 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV5-10 3PV (4K51701-12) Air Sampled: 11/17/15 14:55 Analyzed: 11/17/1515:06 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 24 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV5-10 3PV (4K51701-12) Air Sampled: 11/17/15 14:55 Analyzed: 11/17/1515:06 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene ND 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 260 500 J Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene ND 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene 310 500 J trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 103% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 99.5% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.5% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 25 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV4-5 3PV (4K51701-13) Air Sampled: 11/17/1515:25 Analyzed: 11/17/1515:35 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m'Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 200 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 100 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 " Benzene ND 100 Bromobenzene ND 500 Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 Chlorobenzene ND 500 Chloroethane ND 200 " Chloroform ND 200 " Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 26 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes SV4-5 3PV (4K51701-13) Air Sampled: 11/17/1515:25 Analyzed: 11/17/1515:35 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 500 ug/m' Air 1 45K1701 11/17/15 11/17/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 Ethylbenzene ND 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes 160 500 J Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene ND 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene 140 500 J trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 " Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 " Vinyl Chloride ND 100 " 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 102% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 99.3% 75-125 " Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 104% 75-125 " Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 27 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 45K1701 - Volatiles Blank (45K1701-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/17/15 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ug/m3 Air Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 200 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 100 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 500 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 Benzene ND 100 " Bromobenzene ND 500 " Bromochloromethane ND 500 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 Bromoform ND 500 Bromomethane ND 500 Carbon disulfide ND 500 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 28 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 45K1701 - Volatiles Blank (45K1701-BLKI) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/17/15 Chlorobenzene ND 500 ug/m' Air Chloroethane ND 200 Chloroform ND 200 Chloromethane ND 500 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Dibromochloromethane ND 500 Dibromomethane ND 500 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 " Ethylbenzene ND 200 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 meta- and para -Xylenes ND 500 Methylene Chloride ND 200 Naphthalene ND 1000 " n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 " n-Propylbenzene ND 500 " ortho-Xylene ND 200 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 Styrene ND 500 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 Toluene ND 500 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 trans- l,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 Trichloroethene ND 100 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 Vinyl Chloride ND 100 2 -Propanol ND 290 Surrogate: DibromoJluoromethane 13500 12500 108 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 12200 12500 97.9 75-125 Surrogate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 12900 12500 103 75-125 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 29 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 45K1701 - Volatiles LCS (45K1701 -BSI) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/17/15 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane 12500 200 ug/m' Air 12500 100 75-136 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 12800 200 12500 103 73-134 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 13500 200 12500 108 56-149 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 12600 200 12500 101 67-137 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane 13000 200 12500 104 83-125 1,1-Dichloroethane 12900 200 12500 103 80-121 l,l-Dichloroethene 13300 100 12500 106 73-137 1,1-Dichloropropene 13800 500 12500 ill 77-122 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 12800 1000 12500 102 67-133 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 13800 500 12500 111 56-145 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 13900 1000 12500 111 71-135 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 13700 500 12500 109 76-120 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 11400 1000 12500 90.8 43-158 1,2-Dibromoethane 13300 500 12500 107 80-123 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 11500 500 12500 92.3 67-139 1,2-Dichloroethane 13700 200 12500 110 70-131 1,2-Dichloropropane 11400 500 12500 91.2 62-144 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 13900 500 12500 ill 78-125 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 13500 500 12500 108 82-120 1,3-Dichloropropane 11900 500 12500 95.3 61-145 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene 13700 500 12500 109 84-120 2,2-Dichloropropane 12300 500 12500 98.4 76-134 2-Chlorotoluene 13800 500 12500 110 69-127 4-Chlorotoluene 14000 500 12500 112 70-127 Benzene 13200 100 12500 106 79-118 Bromobenzene 12800 500 12500 103 69-140 Bromochloromethane 12200 500 12500 97.8 61-141 Bromodichloromethane 13800 500 12500 ill 67-137 Bromoform 13000 500 12500 104 57-152 Bromomethane 12400 500 12500 98.8 51-148 Carbon disulfide 12300 500 12500 98.2 61-140 Carbon tetrachloride 12700 100 12500 102 74-143 Chlorobenzene 12600 500 12500 100 67-140 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 30 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 45K1701 - Volatiles LCS (45K1701 -BSI) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/17/15 Chloroethane 13000 200 ug/m' Air 12500 104 60-137 Chloroform 13400 200 12500 107 82-125 Chloromethane 13200 500 12500 106 58-139 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 13300 200 12500 106 85-125 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene 13300 500 12500 106 66-142 Dibromochloromethane 13900 500 12500 111 61-140 Dibromomethane 13300 500 12500 106 66-143 Dichlorodifluoromethane 12600 200 12500 101 47-129 Ethylbenzene 12900 200 12500 103 83-115 Hexachlorobutadiene 9780 1000 12500 78.2 71-145 Isopropylbenzene 12600 500 12500 101 85-116 meta -and para -Xylenes 25400 500 25000 102 83-115 Methylene Chloride 12100 200 12500 97.0 81-126 Naphthalene 13500 1000 12500 108 56-136 n-Butylbenzene 12900 1000 12500 103 60-149 n-Propylbenzene 11800 500 12500 94.4 77-129 ortho-Xylene 12700 200 12500 102 85-115 p-Isopropyltoluene 12300 500 12500 98.6 63-144 sec-Butylbenzene 11500 500 12500 91.9 70-128 Styrene 12300 500 12500 98.2 65-142 tert-Butylbenzene 13100 500 12500 105 70-128 Tetrachloroethene 12600 100 12500 101 66-144 Toluene 12600 500 12500 101 70-115 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 13200 200 12500 106 72-133 trans- l,3-Dichloropropene 12700 500 12500 102 68-140 Trichloroethene 12500 100 12500 99.9 68-132 Trichlorofluoromethane 12400 200 12500 99.5 62-144 Vinyl Chloride 12600 100 12500 101 66-137 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 13400 12500 107 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 12400 12500 99.2 75-125 Surrogate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 12400 12500 99.2 75-125 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 31 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 45K1701 - Volatiles LCS (45K1701-BS2) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/17/15 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 290000 50000 ug/m' Air 250000 116 70-130 Duplicate (45K1701-DUPl) Source: 4K51701-03 Prepared & Analyzed: 11/17/15 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50000 ug/m' Air ND 50 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ND 50 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 200 ND 50 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 200 ND 50 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 200 ND 50 1, 1,2-Trichloro-tri fluoroethane ND 200 ND 50 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 200 ND 50 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 100 ND 50 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 500 ND 50 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 ND 50 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 500 ND 50 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1000 ND 50 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 ND 50 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1000 ND 50 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 500 ND 50 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 ND 50 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 200 ND 50 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 ND 50 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 500 ND 50 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 ND 50 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 500 ND 50 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 500 ND 50 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 500 ND 50 2-Chlorotoluene ND 500 ND 50 4-Chlorotoluene ND 500 ND 50 Benzene ND 100 ND 50 Bromobenzene ND 500 ND 50 Bromochloromethane ND 500 ND 50 Bromodichloromethane ND 500 ND 50 Bromoform ND 500 ND 50 Bromomethane ND 500 ND 50 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 32 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 45K1701 - Volatiles Duplicate (45K1701-DUP1) Source: 4K51701-03 Prepared & Analyzed: 11/17/15 Carbon disulfide ND 500 ug/m' Air ND 50 Carbon tetrachloride ND 100 ND 50 Chlorobenzene ND 500 ND 50 Chloroethane ND 200 ND 50 Chloroform ND 200 ND 50 Chloromethane ND 500 ND 50 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 ND 50 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 ND 50 Dibromochloromethane ND 500 ND 50 Dibromomethane ND 500 ND 50 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 200 ND 50 Ethylbenzene 180 200 190 5.41 50 J Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1000 ND 50 Isopropylbenzene ND 500 ND 50 meta- and para -Xylenes 570 500 610 6.78 50 Methylene Chloride ND 200 ND 50 Naphthalene ND 1000 ND 50 n-Butylbenzene ND 1000 ND 50 n-Propylbenzene ND 500 ND 50 ortho-Xylene 150 200 160 6.45 50 J p-Isopropyltoluene ND 500 ND 50 sec-Butylbenzene ND 500 ND 50 Styrene ND 500 ND 50 tert-Butylbenzene ND 500 ND 50 Tetrachloroethene ND 100 ND 50 Toluene 500 500 510 1.98 50 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 200 ND 50 trans- l,3-Dichloropropene ND 500 ND 50 Trichloroethene ND 100 ND 50 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 200 ND 50 Vinyl Chloride ND 100 ND 50 2 -Propanol ND 290 ND 200 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 13300 1112500 106 75-125 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 33 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 45K1701 - Volatiles Duplicate (45K1701-DUP1) Source: 4K51701-03 Prepared & Analyzed: 11/17/15 Surrogate: Toluene-& Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 12200 ug/m3Air 12500 97.7 75-125 12700 11 12500 102 75-125 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 34 of 35 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 18 -Nov -15 09:27 Notes and Definitions J Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration (CLP J -Flag). DET Analyte DETECTED ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit NR Not Reported dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis RPD Relative Percent Difference The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 35 of 35 November 19, 2015 Mr. Anthony F. Severini Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. 16510 Aston Street Irvine, California 92606 RE: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. Enclosed are the results of analyses for soil samples received by Environmental Support Technologies laboratory on 11/18/1511:36. The analyses were performed according to the prescribed method as outlined by EPA 8260B. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact Project Manager. Sincerely, Dien Nguyen Senior Chemist Environmental Support Technologies laboratories are certified by the California Department of Health Services (CDHS), Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) No's. 2772, 2773, and 2767. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 1 of 37 ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Analyzed B-3-5' 2K51801-01 Soil 17 -Nov -15 07:27 18 -Nov -15 18:17 B-1-5' 2K51801-02 Soil 17 -Nov -15 07:46 18 -Nov -15 18:44 B-7-5' 2K51801-03 Soil 17 -Nov -15 08:05 18 -Nov -15 19:12 B-8-5' 2K51801-04 Soil 17 -Nov -15 08:21 18 -Nov -15 19:39 B-9-5' 2K51801-05 Soil 17 -Nov -15 08:54 18 -Nov -15 20:06 B-10-5' 2K51801-06 Soil 17 -Nov -15 09:04 18 -Nov -15 20:33 B-2-5' 2K51801-07 Soil 17 -Nov -15 09:41 18 -Nov -15 21:00 B-6-5' 2K51801-08 Soil 17 -Nov -15 10:20 18 -Nov -15 21:27 B-5-5' 2K51801-09 Soil 17 -Nov -15 10:49 18 -Nov -15 21:54 B-5-10' 2K51801-10 Soil 17 -Nov -15 11:10 18 -Nov -15 22:20 B-5-15' 2K51801-11 Soil 17 -Nov -15 11:23 18 -Nov -15 22:47 B-4-5' 2K51801-12 Soil 17 -Nov -15 11:45 18 -Nov -15 23:14 B-4-10' 2K51801-13 Soil 17 -Nov -15 11:56 18 -Nov -15 23:40 B-4-15' 2K51801-14 Soil 17 -Nov -15 12:10 19 -Nov -15 00:07 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 1 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-3-5' (2K51801-01) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 07:27 Analyzed: 11/18/15 18:17 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 4.1 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 4.1 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 4.1 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 4.1 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 4.1 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 4.1 " 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 4.1 " 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 4.1 " 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4.1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 4.1 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 4.1 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 4.1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.1 " 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.1 " 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 4.1 " 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.1 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.1 2-Chlorotoluene ND 4.1 4-Chlorotoluene ND 4.1 Benzene ND 4.1 Bromobenzene ND 4.1 Bromochloromethane ND 4.1 Bromodichloromethane ND 4.1 Bromoform ND 4.1 Bromomethane ND 4.1 " Carbon disulfide ND 4.1 " Carbon tetrachloride ND 4.1 " Chlorobenzene ND 4.1 Chloroethane ND 4.1 Chloroform ND 4.1 Chloromethane ND 4.1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.1 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 2 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-3-5' (2K51801-01) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 07:27 Analyzed: 11/18/15 18:17 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 4.1 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 4.1 Dibromomethane ND 4.1 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 4.1 Ethylbenzene ND 4.1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 4.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 4.1 Methylene Chloride ND 4.1 Naphthalene ND 4.1 n-Butylbenzene ND 4.1 " n-Propylbenzene ND 4.1 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 4.1 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 4.1 Styrene ND 4.1 tert-Butylbenzene ND 4.1 Tetrachloroethene ND 4.1 Toluene ND 4.1 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 4.1 Trichloroethene ND 4.1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 4.1 Vinyl Chloride ND 4.1 " Xylenes (total) ND 12 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 116% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 101% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 92.7% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 210 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 3 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-1-5' (2K51801-02) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 07:46 Analyzed: 11/18/15 18:44 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 3.9 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 3.9 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 3.9 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 3.9 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 3.9 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 3.9 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 3.9 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 3.9 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 3.9 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 3.9 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 3.9 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 3.9 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 3.9 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 3.9 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 3.9 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 3.9 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 3.9 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 3.9 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 3.9 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 3.9 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 3.9 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 3.9 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 3.9 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 3.9 " Benzene ND 3.9 Bromobenzene ND 3.9 Bromochloromethane ND 3.9 Bromodichloromethane ND 3.9 Bromoform ND 3.9 Bromomethane ND 3.9 Carbon disulfide ND 3.9 Carbon tetrachloride ND 3.9 Chlorobenzene ND 3.9 Chloroethane ND 3.9 " Chloroform ND 3.9 " Chloromethane ND 3.9 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 3.9 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 4 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-1-5' (2K51801-02) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 07:46 Analyzed: 11/18/15 18:44 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 3.9 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 3.9 Dibromomethane ND 3.9 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 3.9 Ethylbenzene ND 3.9 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 3.9 Isopropylbenzene ND 3.9 Methylene Chloride ND 3.9 Naphthalene ND 3.9 n-Butylbenzene ND 3.9 " n-Propylbenzene ND 3.9 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 3.9 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 3.9 Styrene ND 3.9 tert-Butylbenzene ND 3.9 Tetrachloroethene ND 3.9 Toluene ND 3.9 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 3.9 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 3.9 Trichloroethene ND 3.9 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 3.9 Vinyl Chloride ND 3.9 " Xylenes (total) ND 12 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 118% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 102% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 867% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 200 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 5 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-7-5' (2K51801-03) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 08:05 Analyzed: 11/18/15 19:12 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " Benzene ND 5.0 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Chloroethane ND 5.0 " Chloroform ND 5.0 " Chloromethane ND 5.0 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 6 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-7-5' (2K51801-03) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 08:05 Analyzed: 11/18/15 19:12 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 5.0 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 Isopropylbenzene ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride ND 5.0 Naphthalene ND 5.0 n-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 " n-Propylbenzene ND 5.0 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 5.0 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Styrene ND 5.0 tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 Toluene ND 5.0 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 " Xylenes (total) ND 15 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 122% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 110% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 79.2% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 250 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 7 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-8-5' (2K51801-04) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 08:21 Analyzed: 11/18/15 19:39 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 4.5 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 4.5 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 4.5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 4.5 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 4.5 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 4.5 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 4.5 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 4.5 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.5 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4.5 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.5 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.5 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 4.5 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 4.5 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.5 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 4.5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.5 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.5 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 4.5 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.5 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.5 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 4.5 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 4.5 " Benzene ND 4.5 Bromobenzene ND 4.5 Bromochloromethane ND 4.5 Bromodichloromethane ND 4.5 Bromoform ND 4.5 Bromomethane ND 4.5 Carbon disulfide ND 4.5 Carbon tetrachloride ND 4.5 Chlorobenzene ND 4.5 Chloroethane ND 4.5 " Chloroform ND 4.5 " Chloromethane ND 4.5 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.5 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 8 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-8-5' (2K51801-04) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 08:21 Analyzed: 11/18/15 19:39 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 4.5 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 4.5 Dibromomethane ND 4.5 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 4.5 Ethylbenzene ND 4.5 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 4.5 Isopropylbenzene ND 4.5 Methylene Chloride ND 4.5 Naphthalene ND 4.5 n-Butylbenzene ND 4.5 " n-Propylbenzene ND 4.5 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 4.5 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 4.5 Styrene ND 4.5 tert-Butylbenzene ND 4.5 Tetrachloroethene ND 4.5 Toluene ND 4.5 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 4.5 Trichloroethene ND 4.5 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 4.5 Vinyl Chloride ND 4.5 " Xylenes (total) ND 14 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 117% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 103% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 85.3% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 230 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 9 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-9-5' (2K51801-05) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 08:54 Analyzed: 11/18/15 20:06 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.7 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 5.7 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.7 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 5.7 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 5.7 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 5.7 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 5.7 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 5.7 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.7 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.7 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.7 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.7 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.7 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.7 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.7 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.7 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.7 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.7 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.7 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.7 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.7 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.7 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.7 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.7 Benzene ND 5.7 " Bromobenzene ND 5.7 Bromochloromethane ND 5.7 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.7 Bromoform ND 5.7 Bromomethane ND 5.7 Carbon disulfide ND 5.7 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.7 Chlorobenzene ND 5.7 Chloroethane ND 5.7 " Chloroform ND 5.7 " Chloromethane ND 5.7 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.7 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 10 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-9-5' (2K51801-05) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 08:54 Analyzed: 11/18/15 20:06 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 5.7 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 5.7 Dibromomethane ND 5.7 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.7 Ethylbenzene ND 5.7 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.7 Isopropylbenzene ND 5.7 Methylene Chloride ND 5.7 Naphthalene ND 5.7 n-Butylbenzene ND 5.7 " n-Propylbenzene ND 5.7 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 5.7 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.7 Styrene ND 5.7 tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.7 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.7 Toluene ND 5.7 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.7 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.7 Trichloroethene ND 5.7 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.7 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.7 " Xylenes (total) ND 17 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 115% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 118% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 103% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 280 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 11 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B -10-5'(2K51801-06) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 09:04 Analyzed: 11/18/15 20:33 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " Benzene 6.4 5.0 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Chloroethane ND 5.0 " Chloroform ND 5.0 " Chloromethane ND 5.0 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 12 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B -10-5'(2K51801-06) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 09:04 Analyzed: 11/18/15 20:33 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 5.0 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 Isopropylbenzene ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride ND 5.0 Naphthalene ND 5.0 n-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 " n-Propylbenzene ND 5.0 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 5.0 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Styrene ND 5.0 tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 Toluene 8.3 5.0 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 " Xylenes (total) ND 15 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 123% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 113% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 73.9% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 250 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 S -GC Page 13 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-2-5' (2K51801-07) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 09:41 Analyzed: 11/18/15 21:00 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " Benzene ND 5.0 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Chloroethane ND 5.0 " Chloroform ND 5.0 " Chloromethane ND 5.0 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 14 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-2-5' (2K51801-07) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 09:41 Analyzed: 11/18/15 21:00 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 5.0 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 Isopropylbenzene ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride ND 5.0 Naphthalene ND 5.0 n-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 " n-Propylbenzene ND 5.0 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 5.0 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Styrene ND 5.0 tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 Toluene ND 5.0 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 " Xylenes (total) ND 15 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 118% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 102% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 81.1% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 250 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 15 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-6-5' (2K51801-08) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 10:20 Analyzed: 11/18/15 21:27 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 4.1 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 4.1 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 4.1 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 4.1 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 4.1 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 4.1 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 4.1 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 4.1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4.1 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.1 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.1 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 4.1 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 4.1 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 4.1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.1 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.1 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 4.1 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.1 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.1 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 4.1 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 4.1 " Benzene ND 4.1 Bromobenzene ND 4.1 Bromochloromethane ND 4.1 Bromodichloromethane ND 4.1 Bromoform ND 4.1 Bromomethane ND 4.1 Carbon disulfide ND 4.1 Carbon tetrachloride ND 4.1 Chlorobenzene ND 4.1 Chloroethane ND 4.1 " Chloroform ND 4.1 " Chloromethane ND 4.1 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.1 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 16 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-6-5' (2K51801-08) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 10:20 Analyzed: 11/18/15 21:27 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 4.1 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 4.1 Dibromomethane ND 4.1 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 4.1 Ethylbenzene ND 4.1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 4.1 Isopropylbenzene ND 4.1 Methylene Chloride ND 4.1 Naphthalene ND 4.1 n-Butylbenzene ND 4.1 " n-Propylbenzene ND 4.1 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 4.1 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 4.1 Styrene ND 4.1 tert-Butylbenzene ND 4.1 Tetrachloroethene ND 4.1 Toluene ND 4.1 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 4.1 Trichloroethene ND 4.1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 4.1 Vinyl Chloride ND 4.1 " Xylenes (total) ND 12 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 117% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 124% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 762% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 200 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 17 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-5-5' (2K51801-09) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 10:49 Analyzed: 11/18/15 21:54 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 4.5 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 4.5 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 4.5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 4.5 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 4.5 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 4.5 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 4.5 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 4.5 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.5 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4.5 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.5 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.5 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 4.5 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 4.5 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.5 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 4.5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.5 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.5 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 4.5 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 4.5 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.5 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 4.5 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 4.5 " Benzene 9.7 4.5 Bromobenzene ND 4.5 Bromochloromethane ND 4.5 Bromodichloromethane ND 4.5 Bromoform ND 4.5 Bromomethane ND 4.5 Carbon disulfide ND 4.5 Carbon tetrachloride ND 4.5 Chlorobenzene ND 4.5 Chloroethane ND 4.5 " Chloroform ND 4.5 " Chloromethane ND 4.5 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.5 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 18 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-5-5' (2K51801-09) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 10:49 Analyzed: 11/18/15 21:54 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 4.5 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 4.5 Dibromomethane ND 4.5 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 4.5 Ethylbenzene ND 4.5 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 4.5 Isopropylbenzene ND 4.5 Methylene Chloride ND 4.5 Naphthalene ND 4.5 n-Butylbenzene ND 4.5 " n-Propylbenzene ND 4.5 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 4.5 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 4.5 Styrene ND 4.5 tert-Butylbenzene ND 4.5 Tetrachloroethene ND 4.5 Toluene 13 4.5 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 4.5 Trichloroethene ND 4.5 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 4.5 Vinyl Chloride ND 4.5 " Xylenes (total) ND 14 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 123% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 121% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 63.8% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 240 230 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 S -GC Page 19 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-5-10' (2K51801-10) Soil Sampled: 11/17/1511:10 Analyzed: 11/18/15 22:20 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 7.3 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 7.3 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 7.3 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 7.3 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 7.3 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 7.3 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 7.3 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 7.3 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 7.3 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 7.3 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 7.3 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 7.3 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 7.3 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 7.3 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 7.3 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 7.3 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 7.3 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 7.3 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 7.3 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 7.3 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 7.3 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 7.3 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 7.3 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 7.3 " Benzene ND 7.3 Bromobenzene ND 7.3 Bromochloromethane ND 7.3 Bromodichloromethane ND 7.3 Bromoform ND 7.3 Bromomethane ND 7.3 Carbon disulfide ND 7.3 Carbon tetrachloride ND 7.3 Chlorobenzene ND 7.3 Chloroethane ND 7.3 " Chloroform ND 7.3 " Chloromethane ND 7.3 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 7.3 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 20 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-5-10' (2K51801-10) Soil Sampled: 11/17/1511:10 Analyzed: 11/18/15 22:20 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 7.3 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 7.3 Dibromomethane ND 7.3 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 7.3 Ethylbenzene ND 7.3 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 7.3 Isopropylbenzene ND 7.3 Methylene Chloride ND 7.3 Naphthalene ND 7.3 n-Butylbenzene ND 7.3 " n-Propylbenzene ND 7.3 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 7.3 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 7.3 Styrene ND 7.3 tert-Butylbenzene ND 7.3 Tetrachloroethene ND 7.3 Toluene ND 7.3 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 7.3 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 7.3 Trichloroethene ND 7.3 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 7.3 Vinyl Chloride ND 7.3 " Xylenes (total) ND 22 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 105% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 93.3% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 400 360 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 21 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B -5-15'(2K51801-11) Soil Sampled: 11/17/1511:23 Analyzed: 11/18/15 22:47 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 7.5 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 7.5 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 7.5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 7.5 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 7.5 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 7.5 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 7.5 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 7.5 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 7.5 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 7.5 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 7.5 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 130 7.5 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 7.5 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 7.5 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 7.5 1,2-Dichloroethane 12 7.5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 7.5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 55 7.5 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 7.5 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 7.5 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 7.5 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 7.5 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 7.5 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 7.5 " Benzene 740 7.5 Bromobenzene ND 7.5 Bromochloromethane ND 7.5 Bromodichloromethane ND 7.5 Bromoform ND 7.5 Bromomethane ND 7.5 Carbon disulfide 130 7.5 Carbon tetrachloride ND 7.5 Chlorobenzene ND 7.5 Chloroethane ND 7.5 " Chloroform ND 7.5 " Chloromethane 15 7.5 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 7.5 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 22 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-5-15' (2K51801-11) Soil Sampled: 11/17/1511:23 Analyzed: 11/18/15 22:47 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 7.5 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 7.5 Dibromomethane ND 7.5 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 7.5 Ethylbenzene 170 7.5 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 7.5 Isopropylbenzene 0.72 7.5 7 Methylene Chloride ND 7.5 Naphthalene 67 7.5 n-Butylbenzene ND 7.5 " n-Propylbenzene 27 7.5 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 7.5 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 7.5 Styrene ND 7.5 tert-Butylbenzene ND 7.5 Tetrachloroethene ND 7.5 Toluene 1200 7.5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 7.5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 7.5 Trichloroethene ND 7.5 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 7.5 Vinyl Chloride ND 7.5 " Xylenes (total) 470 23 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 114% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 115% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 9100 380 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 23 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-4-5' (2K51801-12) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 11:45 Analyzed: 11/18/15 23:14 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " Benzene ND 5.0 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Chloroethane ND 5.0 " Chloroform ND 5.0 " Chloromethane ND 5.0 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 24 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-4-5' (2K51801-12) Soil Sampled: 11/17/15 11:45 Analyzed: 11/18/15 23:14 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 5.0 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 Isopropylbenzene ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride ND 5.0 Naphthalene ND 5.0 n-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 " n-Propylbenzene ND 5.0 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 5.0 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Styrene ND 5.0 tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene 16 5.0 Toluene ND 5.0 trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Trichloroethene 3.2 5.0 7 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 " Xylenes (total) ND 15 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 98.5% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 98.9% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 112% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 250 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 25 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B -4-10'(2K51801-13) Soil Sampled: 11/17/1511:56 Analyzed: 11/18/15 23:40 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " Benzene ND 5.0 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Chloroethane ND 5.0 " Chloroform ND 5.0 " Chloromethane ND 5.0 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 26 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B -4-10'(2K51801-13) Soil Sampled: 11/17/1511:56 Analyzed: 11/18/15 23:40 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/18/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 5.0 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 Isopropylbenzene ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride ND 5.0 Naphthalene ND 5.0 n-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 " n-Propylbenzene ND 5.0 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 5.0 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Styrene ND 5.0 tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 Toluene ND 5.0 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 " Xylenes (total) ND 15 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 109% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 109% 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 97.0% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 250 1 GROs by GC/MS The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 27 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-4-15' (2K51801-14) Soil Sampled: 11/17/1512:10 Analyzed: 11/19/15 00:07 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/19/15 EPA 8260B 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 11 5.0 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1, 1 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 " 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.3 5.0 J 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 " 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 " Benzene ND 5.0 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 Chloroethane ND 5.0 " Chloroform ND 5.0 " Chloromethane ND 5.0 " cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 28 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Analyte Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes B-4-15' (2K51801-14) Soil Sampled: 11/17/1512:10 Analyzed: 11/19/15 00:07 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene ND 5.0 ug/kg 1 25K1801 11/18/15 11/19/15 EPA 8260B Dibromochloromethane ND 5.0 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 Isopropylbenzene ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride ND 5.0 Naphthalene ND 5.0 n-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 " n-Propylbenzene ND 5.0 " p-Isopropyltoluene ND 5.0 " sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Styrene ND 5.0 tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 Toluene 6.1 5.0 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 " Xylenes (total) ND 15 " Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 106% 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 111 % 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101% 75-125 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 36000 250 1 GROs by GC/Ms The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 E Page 29 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 251(1801 - EPA 5030 Soil MS Blank (25K1801-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/18/15 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 250 ug/kg 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 " 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 Benzene ND 5.0 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Bromofonn ND 5.0 Bromomethane ND 5.0 Carbon disulfide ND 5.0 Carbon tetrachloride ND 5.0 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 30 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 25K1801 - EPA 5030 Soil MS Blank (25K1801-BLKI) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/18/15 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 ug/kg Chloroethane ND 5.0 Chloroform ND 5.0 Chloromethane ND 5.0 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Dibromochloromethane ND 5.0 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 Isopropylbenzene ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride ND 5.0 Naphthalene ND 5.0 n-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 n-Propylbenzene ND 5.0 p-Isopropyltoluene ND 5.0 sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Styrene ND 5.0 tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 Toluene ND 5.0 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 trans- l,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 Vinyl Chloride ND 5.0 Xylenes (total) ND 15 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 58.6 50.0 117 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 47.4 50.0 94.8 75-125 Surrogate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 48.5 50.0 97.0 75-125 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 31 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 25K1801 - EPA 5030 Soil MS LCS (25K1801 -BSI) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/18/15 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane 48.7 5.0 ug/kg 50.0 97.4 74-129 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 50.7 5.0 50.0 101 81-124 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 51.3 5.0 50.0 103 61-125 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 53.7 5.0 50.0 107 77-118 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane 52.6 5.0 50.0 105 85-115 1,1-Dichloroethane 53.5 5.0 50.0 107 83-117 1,1-Dichloroethene 49.4 5.0 50.0 98.8 85-116 1,1-Dichloropropene 53.0 5.0 50.0 106 80-116 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 53.0 5.0 50.0 106 85-118 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 47.3 5.0 50.0 94.6 64-122 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 53.5 5.0 50.0 107 85-115 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 49.9 5.0 50.0 99.7 85-115 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 51.0 5.0 50.0 102 36-148 1,2-Dibromoethane 54.1 5.0 50.0 108 85-115 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 51.9 5.0 50.0 104 85-115 1,2-Dichloroethane 50.6 5.0 50.0 101 82-118 1,2-Dichloropropane 55.6 5.0 50.0 111 85-115 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 52.4 5.0 50.0 105 85-115 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 54.1 5.0 50.0 108 85-115 1,3-Dichloropropane 55.9 5.0 50.0 112 83-116 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene 54.3 5.0 50.0 109 85-115 2,2-Dichloropropane 50.7 5.0 50.0 101 71-144 2-Chlorotoluene 51.7 5.0 50.0 103 85-115 4-Chlorotoluene 52.1 5.0 50.0 104 85-115 Benzene 52.7 5.0 50.0 105 85-115 Bromobenzene 50.0 5.0 50.0 100 85-115 Bromochloromethane 50.2 5.0 50.0 100 81-117 Bromodichloromethane 55.2 5.0 50.0 110 80-121 Bromoform 47.8 5.0 50.0 95.7 53-145 Bromomethane 49.9 5.0 50.0 99.8 75-123 Carbon disulfide 49.2 5.0 50.0 98.4 78-125 Carbon tetrachloride 52.8 5.0 50.0 106 83-125 Chlorobenzene 53.4 5.0 50.0 107 85-115 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 32 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 25K1801 - EPA 5030 Soil MS LCS (25K1801 -BSI) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/18/15 Chloroethane 53.0 5.0 ug/kg 50.0 106 63-145 Chloroform 56.1 5.0 50.0 112 82-120 Chloromethane 48.3 5.0 50.0 96.5 71-128 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 52.4 5.0 50.0 105 81-122 cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene 52.0 5.0 50.0 104 85-116 Dibromochloromethane 51.3 5.0 50.0 103 76-116 Dibromomethane 55.9 5.0 50.0 112 83-117 Dichlorodifluoromethane 48.8 5.0 50.0 97.6 75-118 Ethylbenzene 52.6 5.0 50.0 105 83-115 Hexachlorobutadiene 51.8 5.0 50.0 104 84-131 Isopropylbenzene 49.4 5.0 50.0 98.7 85-115 Methylene Chloride 49.3 5.0 50.0 98.6 85-119 Naphthalene 51.2 5.0 50.0 102 58-121 n-Butylbenzene 54.5 5.0 50.0 109 85-117 n-Propylbenzene 52.4 5.0 50.0 105 85-115 p-Isopropyltoluene 50.7 5.0 50.0 101 85-115 sec-Butylbenzene 53.5 5.0 50.0 107 85-115 Styrene 53.7 5.0 50.0 107 85-115 tert-Butylbenzene 50.1 5.0 50.0 100 85-115 Tetrachloroethene 53.9 5.0 50.0 108 70-139 Toluene 51.6 5.0 50.0 103 77-115 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 52.8 5.0 50.0 106 85-115 trans- l,3-Dichloropropene 47.6 5.0 50.0 95.2 77-121 Trichloroethene 51.4 5.0 50.0 103 79-123 Trichlorofluoromethane 51.6 5.0 50.0 103 63-151 Vinyl Chloride 50.1 5.0 50.0 100 85-116 Xylenes (total) 158 15 150 105 79-115 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 54.9 50.0 110 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 51.9 50.0 104 75-125 Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.5 50.0 101 75-125 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 33 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severini 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 25K1801 - EPA 5030 Soil MS LCS (25K1801-BS2) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/18/15 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 220 120 ug/kg 250 88.0 73-114 LCS Dup (25K1801-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/18/15 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane 47.6 5.0 ug/kg 50.0 95.3 74-129 2.20 20 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 53.2 5.0 50.0 106 81-124 4.81 20 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 48.5 5.0 50.0 97.0 61-125 5.49 20 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 52.5 5.0 50.0 105 77-118 2.18 20 1,1,2-Trichloro-trifluoroethane 54.7 5.0 50.0 109 85-115 3.95 20 1,1-Dichloroethane 54.5 5.0 50.0 109 83-117 2.00 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 49.4 5.0 50.0 98.7 85-116 0.0405 20 1,1-Dichloropropene 53.5 5.0 50.0 107 80-116 1.05 20 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 54.5 5.0 50.0 109 85-118 2.64 20 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 48.3 5.0 50.0 96.6 64-122 2.09 20 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 51.9 5.0 50.0 104 85-115 3.00 20 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 51.7 5.0 50.0 103 85-115 3.55 20 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 47.4 5.0 50.0 94.8 36-148 7.28 20 1,2-Dibromoethane 51.6 5.0 50.0 103 85-115 4.88 20 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 54.8 5.0 50.0 110 85-115 5.55 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 49.5 5.0 50.0 98.9 82-118 2.28 20 1,2-Dichloropropane 54.1 5.0 50.0 108 85-115 2.81 20 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 53.5 5.0 50.0 107 85-115 2.04 20 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 54.2 5.0 50.0 108 85-115 0.148 20 1,3-Dichloropropane 53.7 5.0 50.0 107 83-116 3.94 20 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene 55.7 5.0 50.0 111 85-115 2.66 20 2,2-Dichloropropane 54.9 5.0 50.0 110 71-144 7.92 20 2-Chlorotoluene 53.6 5.0 50.0 107 85-115 3.49 20 4-Chlorotoluene 54.3 5.0 50.0 109 85-115 4.17 20 Benzene 53.1 5.0 50.0 106 85-115 0.643 20 Bromobenzene 54.3 5.0 50.0 109 85-115 8.20 20 Bromochloromethane 49.6 5.0 50.0 99.2 81-117 1.16 20 Bromodichloromethane 54.9 5.0 50.0 110 80-121 0.545 20 Bromoform 46.0 5.0 50.0 91.9 53-145 4.01 20 Bromomethane 53.3 5.0 50.0 107 75-123 6.51 20 Carbon disulfide 52.3 5.0 50.0 105 78-125 6.14 20 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirely. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 34 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 25K1801 - EPA 5030 Soil MS LCS Dup (25K1801-BSDI) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/18/15 Carbon tetrachloride 55.0 5.0 ug/kg 50.0 110 83-125 4.04 20 Chlorobenzene 50.3 5.0 50.0 101 85-115 6.02 20 Chloroethane 55.4 5.0 50.0 111 63-145 4.47 20 Chloroform 54.2 5.0 50.0 108 82-120 3.52 20 Chloromethane 49.7 5.0 50.0 99.4 71-128 2.98 20 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 53.7 5.0 50.0 107 81-122 2.53 20 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 51.5 5.0 50.0 103 85-116 1.00 20 Dibromochloromethane 49.3 5.0 50.0 98.5 76-116 4.10 20 Dibromomethane 49.8 5.0 50.0 99.6 83-117 11.6 20 Dichlorodifluoromethane 49.8 5.0 50.0 99.6 75-118 1.95 20 Ethylbenzene 52.9 5.0 50.0 106 83-115 0.493 20 Hexachlorobutadiene 51.2 5.0 50.0 102 84-131 1.17 20 Isopropylbenzene 55.0 5.0 50.0 110 85-115 10.7 20 Methylene Chloride 51.1 5.0 50.0 102 85-119 3.70 20 Naphthalene 49.7 5.0 50.0 99.4 58-121 2.97 20 n-Butylbenzene 54.7 5.0 50.0 109 85-117 0.329 20 n-Propylbenzene 54.0 5.0 50.0 108 85-115 3.05 20 p-Isopropyltoluene 52.7 5.0 50.0 105 85-115 3.90 20 sec-Butylbenzene 55.6 5.0 50.0 111 85-115 3.92 20 Styrene 54.2 5.0 50.0 108 85-115 1.04 20 tert-Butylbenzene 52.0 5.0 50.0 104 85-115 3.80 20 Tetrachloroethene 55.6 5.0 50.0 111 70-139 3.07 20 Toluene 53.3 5.0 50.0 107 77-115 3.20 20 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 53.1 5.0 50.0 106 85-115 0.567 20 trans- l,3-Dichloropropene 45.2 5.0 50.0 90.4 77-121 5.17 20 Trichloroethene 52.6 5.0 50.0 105 79-123 2.15 20 Trichlorofluoromethane 55.0 5.0 50.0 110 63-151 6.35 20 Vinyl Chloride 53.6 5.0 50.0 107 85-116 6.75 20 Xylenes (total) 165 15 150 110 79-115 4.33 20 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 56.0 50.0 112 75-125 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 49.4 50.0 98.7 75-125 Surrogate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 50.5 50.0 101 75-125 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 35 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Volatile Organic Compounds - Quality Control Environmental Support Technologies Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 25K1801 - EPA 5030 Soil MS LCS Dup (25K1801-BSD2) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/18/15 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 270 120 ug/kg 250 108 73-114 20.5 20 QR -04 Batch 25K2001 - Volatiles Blank (25K2001-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 11/20/05 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50 ug/1 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 26.2 25.0 105 77-130 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 24.3 25.0 97.0 84-119 Surrogate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 26.2 25.0 105 81-117 Duplicate (25K2001-DUPl) Source: 2K51801-02 Prepared & Analyzed: 11/20/05 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 408 50 ug/l ND 20 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 27.6 25.0 110 77-130 Surrogate: Toluene -d8 25.1 25.0 101 84-119 Surrogate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 27.4 25.0 110 81-117 The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 36 of 37 Environmental Management Strategies, Inc. Project: 375 Bristol St. Costa Mesa, CA. 16510 Aston Street Project Number: EMS547 Reported: Irvine, California 92606 Project Manager: Mr. Anthony F. Severin 19 -Nov -15 14:54 Notes and Definitions S -GC Surrogate recovery outside of control limits. The data was accepted based on valid recovery of the remaining surrogates. QR -04 The RPD result for this analyte in the sample exceeded the QC control limits; however, the RPD for other analytes were within the QC control limits. 7 Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration (CLP 7 -Flag). E The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the instrument. This value is considered an estimate (CLP E -flag). DET Analyte DETECTED ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit NR Not Reported dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis RPD Relative Percent Difference The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 16510 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92606 Telephone: (949) 679-9500 Fax: (949) 679-9501 Page 37 of 37 APPENDIX E Hydrology Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 [Type here] Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) Project Name: Bristol Food Hall and Storage 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA Entitlement Phase City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, CA Parcels 1, 2, 3 and A of Parcel Map No. 94-112 M.B. 286, Pages 37 and 38 3J8 Acres Site Address: 375 Bristol Street COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Prepared for: James Walkie Ray Sanderson J. Ray Development 2699 White Road Irvine, CA 92614 Prepared December 16, 2015 Prepared by: P S O M A S 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 (714) 751-7373 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 II Project Owner's Certification Permit/ Application No. N/A Grading Permit No. N/A PBK215PG12 Tract/Parcel Map No. Parcell Building Permit No. N/A .............................................................................................................................................._................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. CUP, SUP, and/or APN (Specify Lot Numbers if Portions of Tract) 119-200-33 This Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (p-WQMP) has been prepared for Sanderson J. Ray Development by PSOMAS. The p-WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the local NPDES Stormwater Program requiring the preparation of the plan. The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent with the current Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the intent of the non -point source NPDES Permit for Waste Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District and the incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors -in -interest shall bear the aforementioned responsibility to implement and amend the p-WQMP. An appropriate number of approved and signed copies of this document shall be available on the subject site in perpetuity. Owner: Name James "Walkie " Ray Title Principal/General Partner Company Sanderson J. Ray Development Address 2699 White Road, #150, Irvine, CA 92614 Email walkieray@sjrd.com Telephone # (949) 660-8888 Signature Date Owner's Certification Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Contents Page No. Section I - Discretionary Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions...................3 SectionII - Project Description.........................................................................4 Section III - Site Description.............................................................................9 Section IV - Best Management Practices(BMPs)............................................13 Section V - Inspection/ Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs........................32 Section VI — Drainage/Site Plan, Calculations and Support Materials ...........35 Section VII - Educational Materials.................................................................36 Sanderson J. Ray Development Table of Contents Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Section I - Discretionary Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 3 Project Infomation Permit/ Application No. N/A Tract/Parcel Map No. P BK 215 PG 12 Parcel 1 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. This Water Quality Management Plan (p-WQMP) is intended to comply with the City of Costa Mesa grading permit requirements which requires preparation of a p-WQMP for all priority projects. Additional Information/ The proposed project is considered a priority project because it is Comments: classified as a significant redevelopment project under the requirements listed in the Orange County Model p-WQMP table 7.II- 2 row 8. A significant redevelopment project is described as one that adds or replaces 5,000 or more square feet of impervious surface. Water Quality Conditions Water Quality Conditions There are no water quality conditions for this project. (list verbatim) Watershed -Based Plan Conditions A Watershed Infiltration and Hydromodification Master Plan Provide applicable (WIHMP) is not complete for the Upper and Lower Newport conditions from watershed Bay watershed. The following TMDLs have been established - based plans including for Upper and Lower Newport Bay: Indicator Bacteria, WIHMPs and TMDLS. Nutrients, Pesticides, Sedimentation/Siltation and Unknown Toxicity. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 3 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Section II - Project Description IIA Project Description Description of Proposed Project Development Category (Verbatim from p-WQMP): Food Hall and Storage ................................................ _ Project Area (ft2): 138,487 ........................................................................T................................................. Number of Dwelling Units: : SIC Code: ................................................. .........................................................................+................................................. The existing 3.18 -acre site consists of an existing automotive strip mall within the City of Costa Mesa Planned Development Commercial land use and General Commercial zoning area. The plan is to demo the Autoplex and redevelop the site for self- : storage and a small restaurant pad. The existing site is comprised Narrative Project of three legal parcels, one for each of the three Autoplex buildings. Description: The proposed project site will consist of two buildings and, thus, should comprise only two parcels. The landscaping will include drought tolerant shrubs and trees in perimeter landscaping. The project does not include delivery areas, loading docks, outdoor materials storage areas, and equipment or vehicle maintenance, repair, washing and fueling areas. ................................................ _ ............................................................r............................................................. Pervious Impervious Project Area i................................r............................ _.................................r............................. Area Area Percentage Percentage (acres or sq ft) (acres or sq ft) ................................................................................................................ Pre -Project Conditions s............................................................... 15,617 sq ft 11% 12.2.,870 sq ft 89% ...................................................................................:.............................................................:............................. Post -Project Conditions 17,470 sq ft 13% 121,017 sq ft 87% .................................................. :................................ :............................ s.................................:............................. The existing site is lower than the adjacent Bristol Street to the north and drains directly into grate inlets in the drive aisles, parking lots and interior courtyards. The existing storm drain flows Drainage from the north to south into the existing County owned reinforced Patterns/ Connections concrete rectangular channel (OCFCD Facility F01 - Santa Ana - Delhi Channel) south of the project. This concrete channel then flows easterly and southerly through the Newport Beach golf course property which then connects into Upper Newport Bay. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 4 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA The proposed drainage pattern is similar to the existing condition, except the proposed site will runoff into biofiltration BMPs before discharging into the storm drain system. The proposed storm drain will have two main laterals - one lateral picks up the east half of the site and another one picks up the west half of the site. These laterals run through the proposed driveways before joining and then connecting to the existing County owned concrete rectangular channel south of the project. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 5 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA II.2 Potential Stormwater Pollutants Pollutants of Concern Circle One: E=Expected to Pollutant be of concern Additional Information and Comments N=Not Expected to be of concern Suspended -Solids / E Expected since landscaping exists on-site. Sediment Nutrients E Expected since landscaping exists on-site. Heavy Metals E Expected in commercial development Pathogens (Bacteria/ Virus) E Bacterial indicators are routinely detected in pavement runoff. Pesticides E Expected since landscaping exists on-site. Oil and Grease E Expected in commercial development Toxic Organic Compounds E Expected in commercial development Trash and Debris E Expected in commercial development. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 6 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA II.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern ® No - Show map ❑ Yes - Describe applicable hydrologic conditions of concern below. Refer to Section 2.2.3 in the TGD. Based on Figure XVI -3d, Susceptibility Analysis Newport Bay - Newport Coastal Streams, this project is located in the potential areas of erosion, habitat and physical structure susceptibility. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 7 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA II.4 Post Development Drainage Characteristics Describe post development drainage characteristics. Refer to Section 2.2.4 in the TGD. The site is located in an area of low infiltration rates according to the Orange County Hydrology Map, which classifies the soil as being soil group D (infiltration rate approximately 0.20 in/hr). Therefore, for this project, biofiltration BMPs are proposed. The proposed project drainage will be collected using roof downspouts, and flow directly into the top of filtration planter boxes and bioretention BMPs with underdrains. Theses planter boxes and bioretention BMPs will consist of a layer of mulch (3"), sandy loam (18"-36"), and gravel (ia"). Once the stormwater passes through the planting material, the water will outlet from the base of the planter by curb drain to the street gutter. II.5 Property Ownership/ Management Describe property ownership/ management. Refer to Section 2.2.5 in the TGD. All parcels of the project are owned by J. Ray Sanderson/Cardinal Development. No portions of the project will be transferred to a public agency and J. Ray Sanderson/Cardinal Development will be responsible for long term maintenance of the projects stormwater facilities. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 8 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Section III - Site Description III.1 Physical Setting Fill out table with relevant information. Refer to Section 2.3.1 in the TGD. Planning Area/ Community Name N/A Location/ Address 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Land Use General Commercial Zoning PDC — Planned Development Commercial Acreage 3.18 acres Predominant Soil Type D Sanderson J. Ray Development Section III Page 9 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA III.2 Site Characteristics Precipitation Zone The site 24-hour, 85th percentile rainfall is 0.74 inches per Figure XVI -i Rainfall Zones in the Technical Guidance Document. The existing site is fully developed with an automotive strip mall Topography with landscaping, parking and driveways. The site is relatively flat with drainage flowing directly into storm drain and drive aisles of the parking lots. The existing site currently drains directly into grate inlets and an Drainage Patterns/Connections underground storm drain system, which drains off-site into the County owned channel to the south. Soil Type, Geology, and The predominant soil type is D, which indicates an infiltration Infiltration Properties rate is 0.2"/hr. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section III Page 10 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Site Characteristics (continued) No historical high groundwater level was identified on the Orange County Infiltration Study Figure XVI -2d, Mapped Hydrogeologic Shallow Groundwater in the Orange County Model P-WQMP (Groundwater) Conditions Technical Guidance Document (TGD) dated February 09, 2011. According to the map, the estimated depth to groundwater is greater than 2o' below ground surface. Geotechnical Conditions A geotechnical investigation shall be prepared for the project (relevant to infiltration) site and to address geotechnical conditions related to infiltration. For this project, off-site drainage drains away from the property Off -Site Drainage towards the public streets and storm drains, and is not comingled with project runoff. Utility and Infrastructure The proposed storm drain has been placed with the necessary Information clearances from existing utilities. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section III Page 11 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA III.3 Watershed Description Fill out table with relevant information and include information regarding BMP sizing, suitability, and feasibility, as applicable. Refer to Section 2.3.3 in the TGD. Receiving Waters Upper Newport Bay and Lower Newport Bay Chlordane, Copper, DDT, Metals, PCBs, Sediment Toxicity, 303(d) Listed Impairments Indicator Bacteria, Nutrients, Pesticides, Sedimentation/Siltation and Unknown Toxicity are on the Approved 2oio List Applicable TMDLs Metals, Nutrients, Siltation, Unknown Toxicity, Pesticides, Pathogens and Priority Organics Pollutants of Concern for The pollutants of concern for the project are those listed in the Project Section 11.2 above. Environmentally Sensitive There are no Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) or Areas and Special Biological of Special Biological Significance (ASBSs) on or within 200 feet Significant Areas of the project site. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section III Page 12 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Section IV - Best Management Practices (BMPs) IV. 1 Project Performance Criteria (NOC Permit Area only) Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing on regional or sub -regional basis? YES ❑ NO If yes, describe WIHMP feasibility criteria or No regional/ sub -regional opportunities. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 13 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Project Performance Criteria (continued) ............................................................................................................................................ .............................................................................................................................. The project is located within a Potential Area of Erosion, Habitat and Physical Structure Susceptibility per Figure XVI -3d in Section VI and in If HCOC exists, the Model P-WQMP TGD. However, the existing site has more list applicable hydromodification imperviousness than the proposed condition per section II.i. Therefore, control the proposed runoff and peals flows shall be lower in the proposed performance condition than in the existing condition. Therefore a Hydrologic criteria (Section Condition of Concern (HCOC) does not exist for this project. 7.II-2.4.2.2 in MP - Runoff from the site will be minimized by included large planting areas WQMP) and detaining the runoff during storm events in filtration planters. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... i) Priority Projects must infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire, or biotreat/biofilter, the 851h percentile, 24-hour storm event (Design Capture Volume). List applicable performance 2) A properly designed biotreatment system may only be criteria (Section considered if infiltration, harvest and use, and 7.II-2.4.3 from MP- evapotranspiration (ET) cannot be feasibly implemented for the WQMP) full design capture volume. In this case, infiltration, harvest and use, and ET practices must be implemented to the greatest extent feasible and biotreatment may be provided for the ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... remaining design capture volume. List applicable treatment control Since infiltration is not feasible on this project, filtration planters and BMP performance bioretention with underdrains will be the stormwater BMPs used on criteria (Section the project. 7.II-3.2.2 from MP- WQMP) Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 14 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Proposed Condition: Vp = C x d x A x 4356o sf/ac x 1/12 in/ft Vp= (0.75xo.81+0.15) x0.73x4.15x4356ox1/12 Vp = 8,330 CF Calculate design Total BMP storage: Vbmp =13,300 CF > 8,330 CF ok storm capture volume for Project. Total BMP treatment*: Vbmp = 35,000 CF > 8,330 CF A *based on design biofiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr and 24-hour draw -down period See Table 1.1 included in Section VI Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 15 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.2. SITE DESIGN AND DRAINAGE PLAN Describe site design and drainage plan including A narrative of site design practices utilized or rationale for not using practices; A narrative of how site is designed to allow BMPs to be incorporated to the MEP • A table of DMA characteristics and list of BMPs proposed in each DMA. • Reference to the P-WQMP plot plan. • Calculation of Design Capture Volume (DCV) for each drainage area. • A listing of GIS coordinates for and Treatment Control BMPs (unless not required by local jurisdiction). Refer to Section 2.4.2 in the TGD. The first step in the BMP selection process is to consider HSCs. There are no significant HSCs proposed for this project. The use of filtration planter boxes and bioretention with underdrains will be used to treat runoff and site drainage. Runoff from the building will be collected using roof downspouts that will flow directly into the top of the filtration planter boxes, where it will be filtered, then discharged into the street at the curb face. Infiltration on site is not feasible because of the low infiltration rate of the underlying soil. Inlet risers are designed to allow the silt and pollutants to settle within the planter boxes, and the peals flows to overflow into the inlet riser. The attached map in Section VI (P-WQMP Drainage/Site Plan) describes the stormwater drainage management area (DMA) and proposed BMPs. The BMP Sizing Table 1.2 in Sections VI includes the Design Capture Volume (DCV) calculations. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 16 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.3 BMP SELECTION AND PROJECT CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS Each sub -section below documents that the proposed design features conform to the applicable project performance criteria via check boxes, tables, calculations, narratives, and/or references to worksheets. Refer to Section 2.4.2.3 in the TGD for selecting BMPs and Section 2.4.3 in the TGD for conducting conformance analysis with project performance criteria. IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls The retention criteria shall be met with a dry extended detention basin, therefore HSCs are not required. Name Included? Localized on -lot infiltration ❑ Impervious area dispersion (e.g. paved parking surface disconnection) Street trees (canopy interception) Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) ❑ Green roofs/Brown roofs ❑ Blue roofs ❑ Impervious area reduction (e.g. permeable pavers, site design) ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 17 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs The retention criteria shall be met with infiltration planter boxes and bioretention with underdrains, which will provide evapotranspiration, biological treatment and filtration, but no infiltration. Name Included? Bioretention ❑ Rain gardens ❑ Porous landscaping ❑ Infiltration planters ❑ Retention swales ❑ Infiltration trenches ❑ Infiltration basins ❑ Drywells ❑ Subsurface infiltration galleries ❑ French drains ❑ Permeable asphalt ❑ Permeable concrete ❑ Permeable concrete pavers ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ It is not feasible to infiltrate on the project site due to the low infiltration rates of the underlying soil (soil type D). IV. 3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 18 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Name Included? All HSCs; See Section IV.3.1 ❑ Surface -based infiltration BMPs ❑ Biotreatment BMPs ❑ Above -ground cisterns and basins ❑ Underground detention ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Show calculations below to demonstrate if the Design Storm Capture Volume can be met with evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting BMPs in combination with infiltration BMPs. If not document how much can be met with either infiltration BMPs, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting BMPs, or a combination, and document why it is not feasible to meet the full volume with either of these BMPs categories. Harvest and reuse is not feasible due to the small size and remote location of the project, and the cost of implementing the system. Instead, the site roof and deck areas drain into a filtration planter boxes, where drainage will be treated and retained. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 19 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs Name Included? Bioretention with underdrains Stormwater planter boxes with underdrains Rain gardens with underdrains ❑ Constructed wetlands ❑ Vegetated swales ❑ Vegetated filter strips ❑ Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems ❑ Wet extended detention basin ❑ Dry extended detention basin ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ The project will treat the site design capture volume (DCV) through the use of filtration planter boxes and bioretention with underdrains. The drainage area is 4.15 acres with a resulting DCV of 8,330 cubic feet (0.19 Ac -ft). The amount of water treated over the 24- hour design storm period is 35,000 cubic feet. See Table m for Biofiltration BMP sizing calculations. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 20 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV. 3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs Hydromodification Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description Not applicable Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 21 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional BMPs Regional/Sub-Regional BMPs Per Figure 7.II-7 of the model P-WQMP, if there is no approved regional BMP or Watershed Infiltration and Hydromodification Master Plan (WIHMP), the project site shall incorporate BMPs as the first priority. There is no regional BMP that this project drains into. For this project, BMPs are being implemented at the source. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 22 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs Treatment control BMPs are not used since the full Design Storm Capture Volume is being treated with infiltration BMPs. Treatment Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description Not applicable Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 23 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.3.8 Non-structural Source Control BMPs Non -Structural Source Control BMPs Check One If not applicable, state brief Included Not Identifier Name reason Applicable N1 Education for Property Owners, ® ❑ Tenants and Occupants .................................................................................................................................................................. N2 Activity Restrictions ® ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. N3 Common Area Landscape ® ❑ Management .................................................................................................................................................................. N4 BMP Maintenance ® ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How ❑ ® No hazardous waste development will comply) .................................................................................................................................................................. N6 Local Industrial Permit Compliance ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. No storage is provided N7 ❑ ® Spill Contingency Plan in project area .................................................................................................................................................................. storage is provided NS Underground Storage Tank ElNo Compliance in project area .................................................................................................................................................................. N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure ❑ ® No hazardous materials Compliance .................................................................................................................................................................. N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. N11 Common Area Litter Control ® ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. N12 Employee Training E E .................................................................................................................................................................. N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks ❑ ® No loading dock .................................................................................................................................................................. N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection ® ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and ® ❑ Parking Lots .................................................................................................................................................................. N16 Retail Gasoline Outlets ❑ ® No retail gasoline outlet Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 24 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA The following non-structural BMPs are proposed for source control and reduction/elimination of pollutants: (See p-WQMP Site Plan in Section VI) N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants: Practical informational materials are provided to occupants or tenants to increase the public's understanding of stormwater quality, sources of pollutants, and what they can do to reduce pollutants in stormwater. Educational materials available from the County of Orange can be downloaded here: http://ocwatersheds.com/publiced/resources/bussbrochure and are also located in Section VII of this report. Explanation/ Description: Sanderson J. Ray Development will provide educational environmental awareness materials to all employees and contractors during the initial hiring and orientation process, and annually thereafter. Among other items, these educational materials will address specific chemicals (including household, commercial, industrial, automotive, and landscape types). The use of these chemicals should be limited to within the confines of the site (generally inside the building) where waste water drains directly into the public sanitary sewer system, with no discharge to gutters, paved areas, drainage devices and landscaped areas where drainage will be released from the site. N2 Activity Restrictions: Sanderson J. Ray Development will provide restrictions to all employees, contractors, etc. on certain activities conducted on this property. Sanderson J. Ray Development will provide a list of these activity restrictions to employees, contractors, etc. upon start date and annually thereafter. If violations occur, Sanderson J. Ray Development will record the event and notify employees, contractors, etc. Sanderson J. Ray Development will provide another list of these activity restrictions. If employees, contractors, etc. continue to violate these activity Restrictions; City of Irvine Code Enforcement will be notified. These restrictions include: Vehicle washing, maintenance or repair outside of designated areas Hosing down of paved areas Disposal of animal waste not in appropriate locations Use of chemicals, pesticides, toxins, etc. on paved or landscape areas Dumping of any waste into drainage facilities Blowing or sweeping of debris (leaf litter, grass clippings, litter, etc.) into drainage facilities Discharges of fertilizer or pesticides to drainage facilities Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 25 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Keeping dumpster lids open Washing kitchen wastes or kitchen equipment to storm water drainage features The owner will inform employees, contractors, etc. that spills are to be swept or vacuumed. N3 Common area landscape maintenance: A licensed landscape maintenance crew will be provided by Sanderson J. Ray Development to maintain area landscaping. This maintenance crew will utilize the following efficient landscape and irrigation practices: • Weekly inspections will be scheduled to ensure proper functioning of the irrigation system. Poorly functioning heads, valves, etc. will be repaired or replaced. Proper functioning of the irrigation system will be confirmed prior to application of Pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers to avoid nuisance runoff and subsequent release Of chemicals into the drainage system. Fertilizers will be worked into the soil to a depth of 4 to 6 inches to reduce the likelihood of their inadvertent runoff into downstream surface waters. All chemical applications will be carried out in strict accordance with the manufacturer's label, and using the minimum effective quantity. Pesticides are to be used only after recommendation from a state -licensed pest control advisor. Pesticides are only to be applied by or under the direct supervision of a state licensed or certified pesticide applicator or by workers with equivalent training. Keep irrigation system at short repeat cycles to minimize runoff and erosion. Replenish wood mulches to reduce evaporation and frequency of watering. N4 BMP maintenance: BMP implementation, operation, and maintenance is described with each BMP Narrative in this section and in Section V, Inspection and Responsibility for BMPs. N1 Common Area Litter Control: Sanderson J. Ray Development will be responsible for implementing trash management and litter control procedures in all areas of the site to reduce pollution of drainage water. Sanderson J. Ray Development may employ a contractor (possibly the landscape maintenance crew) to implement these procedures on a regular basis. Essential tasks will include daily inspection of trash in paved and unpaved areas, and noting trash disposal violations by employees, contractors, etc. If violations occur, employees, Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 26 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA contractors, etc. will be notified by the Sanderson J. Ray Development, and further education will be provided. N12 Employee Training: Practical informational materials and/or training are provided to employees to increase their understanding of stormwater quality, sources of pollutants, and their responsibility for reducing pollutants in stormwater. Explanation/ Description: Education program (See Ni) will be provided by Sanderson J. Ray Development to employees to increase their understanding of stormwater quality and responsibility to reduce pollutant discharge into stormwater. N14 On-site Catch Basin and Inlet Inspection: The area drain lines must be inspected and if necessary, cleaned (when over 40% full), repaired or replaced prior to the start of each rainy season (no later than October 15th of each year). Silt, debris, and any other obstruction are to be removed from the bottom of atrium inlets once every three months, within five days prior to October 15th and after every storm event. Sanderson J. Ray Development may employ a contractor (possibly the landscape maintenance crew) to implement these procedures on a regular basis. N15 Drive Aisle and Parking Area Sweeping: Drive aisles and parking areas will be swept clean every two weeks and once within five days prior to Oct.15th. It is prohibited for street sweepers to sweep debris into storm drain inlets or vegetated swales. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 27 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs Structural Source Control BMPs Check One Identifier Name If not applicable, state brief Not Included Applicable reason S1 Provide storm drain system stenciling ® ❑ and signage Design and construct outdoor material S2 storage areas to reduce pollution ❑ introduction Design and construct trash and waste S3 storage areas to reduce pollution ® ❑ introduction Use efficient irrigation systems & S4 landscape design, water conservation, ® ❑ smart controllers, and source control S5 Protect slopes and channels and ❑ ® No slopes or channels provide energy dissipation Incorporate requirements applicable to individual priority project categories ❑ (from SDRWQCB NPDES Permit) S6 Dock areas ❑ ® No dock areas S7 Maintenance bays ❑ ® No maintenance bays S8 Vehicle wash areas ❑ ® No vehicle wash areas No outdoor processing S9 Outdoor processing areas El ® areas S10 Equipment wash areas ❑ ® No equipment wash areas S11 Fueling areas ❑ ® No fueling areas S12 Hillside landscaping ❑ ❑ No hillsides S13 Wash water control for food ® ❑ preparation areas No community car wash S14 Community car wash racks El ® racks Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 28 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA The following structural BMPs are proposed for source control and reduction/elimination of pollutants: (See p-WQMP Site Plan in Section VI) Provide storm drain system labeling and signage: Phrase "No Dumping - Drains to Ocean" or equally effective phrase to be labeled on grate and drain inlets to alert the public to the destination of pollutants discharged into storm water. Sanderson J. Ray Development shall decide if the label will be painted stencil, concrete etching, thermoplastic, ceramic tile, metal plaques, or equally effective alternative. Sanderson J. Ray Development will inspect all inlets every three months for legibility. The label shall be replaced if broken or illegible. Markers shall be restenciled at a minimum once every five years. Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design: The timing and application methods of irrigation water shall be designed to minimize the runoff of excess irrigation water into the storm drain system. The following methods have been implemented to reduce excessive irrigation runoff: • Employment of irrometer devices (moisture sensors) to prevent irrigation after precipitation. • The use of flow sensors and master control valves to shut down valve when triggered by a pressure drop. This shut down will control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines. • The irrigation application method considered shall be a drip system. A drip irrigation system is buried under the soil, which eliminates runoff and wind misting and minimizes water loss due to evaporation. • The timing of irrigation water shall be designed at short repeat cycles to further eliminate irrigation water runoff and to minimize erosion, due to saturated soil. • Native or drought -tolerant plants will be used, the plants used have low to medium water requirements and are appropriate for the climate of the area. • Mulch is used in planter areas to minimize sediment in runoff. The procedures for irrigation system and landscape maintenance and inspection are described in Section V, Operations and Maintenance Plan (N3). The irrigation system shall be inspected weekly in conjunction with maintenance activities. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 29 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.4 ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE PLAN (IF APPLICABLE) IV.4.1 Water Quality Credits I Description of Proposed Project 11 Project Types that Qualify for Water Quality Credits (Select all that apply): ❑Redevelopment projects that reduce the overall impervious footprint of the project site. ❑Brownfield redevelopment, meaning redevelopment, expansion, or reuse of real property which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants, and which have the potential to contribute to adverse ground or surface WQ if not redeveloped. ❑ Mixed use development, such as a combination of residential, commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or other land uses which incorporate design principles that can demonstrate environmental benefits that would not be realized through single use projects (e.g. reduced vehicle trip traffic with the potential to reduce sources of water or air pollution). ❑ Higher density development projects which include two distinct categories (credits can only be taken for one category): those with more than seven units per acre of development (lower credit allowance); vertical density developments, for example, those with a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 2 or those having more than 18 units per acre (greater credit allowance). ❑ Transit -oriented developments, such as a mixed use residential or commercial area designed to maximize access to public transportation; similar to above criterion, but where the development center is within one half mile of a mass transit center (e.g. bus, rail, light rail or commuter train station). Such projects would not be able to take credit for both categories, but may have greater credit assigned Calculation of Water Quality Credits Not applicable (if applicable) ❑ Redevelopment projects in an established historic district, historic preservation area, or similar significant city area including core City Center areas (to be defined through mapping). ❑In -fill projects, the conversion of empty lots and other underused spaces into more beneficially used spaces, such as residential or commercial areas. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 30 ❑ ❑ Live -work developments, a ❑Developments withElDevelopments variety of developments designed dedication of undeveloped i 1 in historic i Developments to support residential and portions to parks, districts or in a city center ;vocational needs together - preservation areas and ;historic similar to criteria to mixed use other pervious uses. area. I preservation development; would not be able areas. to take credit for both categories. Calculation of Water Quality Credits Not applicable (if applicable) ❑ Redevelopment projects in an established historic district, historic preservation area, or similar significant city area including core City Center areas (to be defined through mapping). ❑In -fill projects, the conversion of empty lots and other underused spaces into more beneficially used spaces, such as residential or commercial areas. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 30 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA IV.4.2 Alternative Compliance Plan Information Describe an alternative compliance plan (if applicable). Include alternative compliance obligations (i.e., gallons, pounds) and describe proposed alternative compliance measures. Refer to Section 7.11 3.0 in the P-WQMP. Not applicable Sanderson J. Ray Development Section IV Page 31 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Section V - Inspection/ Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs Inspection and maintenance records must be kept for a minimum of five years for inspection by the regulatory agencies. BMP Inspection/ Maintenance Inspection/ Minimum Reponsible BMP Maintenance Frequency of Party(s) Activities Required Activities James Walkie Ray, Inspection of drainage BIO -1: Filtration Sanderson J. Ray Corporation, 2699 inlets and swales for Planter Boxes and White Road Irvine, CA clogging and to ensure Minimum quarterly Bioretention with 92614. Email: drainage system is working per year, before and Underdrains walkieray(cDsird.com as designed. Accumulated after rainy season. (949) 660-8888 litter and sediment shall be removed immediately. Sanderson J. Ray Development Inc. will provide employees and contractors with educational materials regarding water quality Upon initial hiring and N1: Education for Sanderson J. Ray protection. All employees orientation of Property Owners, Corporation and contractors must be employees and Tenants and See above trained and aware of the contractors, and Occupants Water Quality annually thereafter. Management Plan. Each employee and contractor will sign off on a handbook receipt indicating they have read and are aware of the document. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 32 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 33 Sanderson J. Ray Development will provide restrictions to all employees, contractors, tenants, etc. on activities that contribute to Property owner, stormwater pollution. contractor, Sanderson J. Ray Property owners, employees, etc. will N2. Activity Corporation employees, contractors, receive a list of Restrictions See above etc. must be trainedand activity restrictions on aware of activity start date and restrictions. Each property annually thereafter. owner, employee contractor, etc. will sign off on a Handbook Receipt indicating they have read and are aware of the document. Manage landscaping in accordance with the State of California Conservation in Landscaping Act of N3. Common Area Sanderson J. Ray 1990 (Model Water Efficient Landscape Weekly during Landscape Corporation Ordinance), with regular Management See above management guidelines maintenance. for use of fertilizers and pesticides (DAMP Appendix F), and with the IGCMP. Sanderson J. Ray N4. BMP Maintenance Corporation This Matrix is BMP N4 See above Litter collection within landscape areas and N11. Common Area Sanderson J. Ray outside walkways. Daily Litter Control Corporation inspection of trash Daily See above receptacles to ensure that lids are closed and any trash on the grounds Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 33 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA N12. Employee Sanderson J. Ray Training: See N1, Corporation apply to See above Employees Once every three N14. Common Sanderson J. Ray Inspect and clean to clean months; once within Area Catch Basin Corporation debris and silt in bottom five days prior to and Inlet See above of catch basins, inlets and October 15th (beginning of rainy Inspection i pipes. season); and after every storm event. N15. Street Sweeping Private Sanderson J. Ray Stormwater pollution Every two weeks, Streets and Corporation prevention includes street and once within five Parking Lots See above sweeping of streets and parking lots. days prior to October 15th S1. Provide storm Sanderson J. Ray Inspected every three months for drain system Corporation Maintain the legibility of legibility. Markers stenciling and See above markers. will be restenciled at signage minimum once every five years. Design Landscaping and Irrigation to protect stormwater quality. Verify that runoff minimizing landscape design continues to function by checking that water Sanderson J. Ray sensors are functioning Weekly in S4. Common Area Corporation properly, that irrigation conjunction with Efficient Irrigation See above heads are adjusted properly to eliminate maintenance overspray to hardscape activities. areas, and that irrigation timing and cycle lengths are adjusted in accordance with water demands, given time of year, weather and day or night time temperatures. Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 34 Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Section VI — Drainage/Site Plan, Calculations and Support Materials VI.1 SITE PLAN AND DRAINAGE PLAN Include a site plan and drainage plan sheet set containing the following minimum information: • Project location 37 • Site boundary • Land uses and land covers, as applicable • Suitability/ feasibility constraints • Structural BMP locations • Drainage delineations and flow information • Drainage connections • BMP details Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 35 PSOMAS J [if0 m O�Q W N Q� m 1 11 �Q ANTON BL �R_ f SAN DIEGO AIRPORT STORM 00 :�p0 2 w D � Z D Y Z _ Q U a PAULARINO O� ST._ _ Q BAKER o ST. CHANNEL all LINGTON <ARK 0 PARK ra //f' REGIONAL D II �q Y 7 HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUP MAP LEGEND SOIL GROUP Loss Rate, F„ D SOILS GROUP DESIGNATION A 0.40 in./hr. B 0.30 in./hr. SOILS GROUP BOUNDARY �i C 0.25 in./hr. D 0.20 in./hr. REFERENCE: HYDROLOGIC CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SCALE: 1 "=2000' RRLA Richard Ramsey Landscape Architect 3035 Bern Drive Laguna Beach, CA 92651 949-290-9009 Rough Grading + Drainage Plan PROJECT 375 Bristol Costa Mesa, CA 92683 DRAWING DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUE/REVISION 07.8.15 City Review #1 ,_pOSCAPe =��Q Qarrar Rams0.k- May Y y a � May — 2017 ti \ 9� RENEWAL \OF C A�IFO L. REVIEW rfr 100 rfr SHEET NO. All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute original and unpublished work of the landscape architect and may not be duplicated, used or disclosed without the written consent of Richard Ramsey Landscape Architect. 3035 Bern Drive Laguna Beach, CA 92651 (949) 290-9009 www.rframsey.com 12" ATRIUM DRAIN 6" PONDING (MAX.; 3" MULCI 12" GRAVEL JACKS NOTES: 0 PERFORATED PIPE 1. SEE CALIFORNIA STORMWATER BMP HANDBOOK BMP NO. TC -32 FOR MORE INFORMATION. BIORETENTION W/ UNDERDRAIN DETAIL NTS INSTALL IMPERMEABLE LINER WHEN BMP IS NEAR OR ADJACENT TO CURBS, WALLS AND STRUCTURES JTING SOIL: DY LOAM, DIY SAND, _OAM TER FABRIC P S O M A S DATE: 12/22/15 REVISED ON: PRE -FILTER PATENTED CARTRIDGE pER/METER r lcl VOID AREA IPI 7IG7d01'71TAFIA`IA -- ----- -- 1 ' �❑ 1 � L i — 1 LLLLLLLLL 1 LLLLLL 1 LLLLL 1 T CURBOPEN/NGT �-3'-0"­j VERTICAL UNDERDR4IN MANIFOLD WETLANDMED/A PLAN VIEW BED VEGETATION PLANT ESTABLISHMENT -'� MEDIA" Kaci2',:i�: �d :!r. DR41N DOWN FILTER OUTLET PIPE SEE NOTES ........................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )0 IE IN nc) 10" PVC il 1.7 /E 10" PVC 6" 4'-0' 5'--4- 2'-6" 6" PRETREATMENT B/OFILTRA TION DISCHARGE 13'-0" 14'-0" ELEVarioNVrEirrMODULAR WETLAND � MANHOLE CURB OPEN/NG i� I I I I I � I tp I I I of I I I °I 6" 4'-0" 6 50 -ON ON END VIEW MANHOLE CIL I � I I I I 1 I 1 I " R/GHTEND VIEW S FLOW CONTROL RISER DETAIL P S 0 M A S NTS DATE: 12/22/15 REVISED ON: X LO N O 0 N N O N 0 4- c- C) - C) I X Q� iL I LU N LO 011 LO N O O N I 4 O V) O N H O O O Q N / X LU N LO 011/ l O cDChlno Hills 1�8 AN� I River Fly Park u ,iu vP u P$ e I Ffd�=i r ,, rim a g s ��sf Rd l � G] IV 4E CIIfLlR .moi: Q - ..�.•Jr ���r�-...Dujlrr 9 LEGEND 4 C p i I r 01v t} rC . k Nnr, ,, a k r `Paramount East om EAI 0.1V I n }ff�E#B Aft $I 0 M 8. } Lake ad E9 4n ur � Hawaikin Gar r55 E .ars n &t O ri .ti1 06 � tc)� J Irk !EWardIow Rd IJ c) I -sir -I',,. ,r� o > 410 Long r each s �a z� I s Ingtori $ �? \4 E a . l �r Da SenI Beam .:-? hat , O' a d mar#or S#n Fwedro anF Pacific o Ocean L*rig Beach hlarbor Sart bra aay Huntington Bea San pe-dro Menne! 0 3 6 12 Kilometers Miles 0 1.8 3.6 7.2 1 I 411 J La Habra 1 � / ReradO l � r.,i r,r eL CL �'�inrx Hills -St perk Pay* ,rrr o Orange County Precipitation Stations - � Z,/ { iG• Cf' �� 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) 009 *IU$1'.0 ✓'�� ✓'��, Y 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) - Extrapolated Yerba City Boundaries Blvd t + ✓✓%`, ��/ $¢f+' �11r $t h I •���4t�. Rai nfal I Zones Cormn ` # 0 �ltifi�, z Design Capture Storm Depth (inches) 0n n■ %U 0.65n Iue rra F 0 0.7 4 at n43 r, i��� �, 0.75 SP `♦ EI Cc r 4 ♦ 0 0.80 ++ raFt n; 0.85 a E Katens A- ✓� E Cal li r,:- - . 0.90 0.95 Orange nd Garde� Grove Ark 0 1.00 i 1.10 0 It ` ` IAr85trnfnster E 17lh � ��� ���•. = nta Note: Events defined as 24-hour periods (calendar days) with greater t dna r than 0.1 inches of rainfall. W 15F St � Sllwera�� 4 �{ � 3 fF7 ■ For areas outside of available data coverage, professional judgment L� E:binevwg shall be applied. 0■7 . S� E Warn*r AYE ,k 11 aW, IIIey VP 39 '10 Ellis Ave a 8 ILI 'PROJECT SITE d~0S 7 r:1 0 Newport .R� 41on D -r a i ¢ �.; Acl it h ,,ti` rp - # Al ~ x} ft C. Lake Elsinore .f 4 r Qrvl i i ♦♦ '' 1.05 ♦ sc ea H Is akeland 1f11111ag+_' $arp��n��'r`�f 0 � �,` �Mh�sEor rd -,1;:,,,.,i ♦- � C0 J JI . tory.; " �• ' �• \JeWD0' Pacific Ocean i �� '•� �I�wNan� ���.�� ♦ MaFionnl � .'� ♦ �vrssl Allso V1, 1♦ or t • Rd ■ i�r�P��rde ��IJF,[ O 'an4 San Sara D+duo counly i Juan �a�F�# eq ■ Dana PoEni Beach ♦{� 1 ♦' W# San Clitirnerto _ -- SL ;, f Nu17 - c a r,rp Pen+llr#on kiarina nnQ I� C� 0 Q LU J U � Q O o Q � 0 O p LUU V Q m o � O0 N 0p rL m N W LLJZ J U co 0 J w 0 0 Z � 0 0 = 0 Q 0 m 'i N N W a.. V s: Q FIGURE X O O N 31 N D 0 0 C- Q 0 nI N X N I.L I LU N LO rn LO N O O N I 4 N 70 V C- 0 Q / 5X L cn / LL N LO 011 I..L L Lod .. k O I. t :' •: h drerFsr�Q# a adrporl D D ak }T ,y` . '�it 4� .• IJ�- LJ �.O ■ vr �'8?LsQ.II' '�r:�1L7ti1#t°l�IMr �-I_anc D L=, ,171� D� �' �//�////LLL -4 -' 'r ~,.' _� ■ O�}•a�nI�III--xL--.,,j��,\\a. \,IIIWIIIara !� Wh:ll,r�r E4k 1vr1 �° _ �w ■��; / I R+ !�t�r�r���l �Ja � �i ������f {Lfir,; UQ r^� l la,uo-.,:� �E Ih�rdl�6it i� 4� Chl,lo ; LEGEND \1 a END `J EI JUjv1T Y Depth To First G roundwater Contours 'u X 7?, Fe Sprllig::rJ(:YJr PV Ff111—fvCity Boundaries ? F 'M G{ALA x E OCWD Groundwater Basin Protection Boundary� {j- t• {`' I f Note: Data are not available for South Orange County at this time. •' '•9111 4''P�iSe'' Y1'k'� Ir' k , ✓ c Mirada fJ J✓� Source: LL -0�k' R _._..♦ ✓✓ Sprotte, Fuller and Greenwood, 1980. I N�rw `•� :' arru� � � sr, �` r, � r t �a Mdrada °iw�r'Y T t °_ California Division of Mines and Geology; u ; i 3 fix} �� —. ;k E ✓. California Geological Survey W ii fir► i ,wL,p I. rl ; W s �, Linda,, Rry la C N 1 -0P �nlla 8:,■rr y11 la ,ara o A I-A6[vf ? 1 i H9rfE Corona 4 ,I c \ - _ ,y d c W y° r ¢ • ■ O ." F rk4.,., 6n�r;r �i,1A *J Li Prj 81, A � a �` � s 4' i ■ �3y ■ n CE A le *4 4 ■ R � 1 �' aY dc t kw own r Ic hill 5'. i1 r 9N rf, I ¢ r r ! r C I�+n /J Y _ n $ . I. I 3 : s �� Cn .J. An ah,ekrrr ` i . Hrmr.rl arxr.n SL 118W�i� '1clr�11 1 -- , '4kxy �1rrlu 5 Y, m ♦ } I�rI a 1�-1 /rye- Imo• ., ♦ r, � '�� _ � . N'ayl-r♦' Y�lek'" Or a $ " ` I ♦- - r E WarSlaw Rd _ L `- ♦�� j y,1 iwc oNII , CYF �.s. r.1 r V1 '- I■, \� -.r 1:: 1 11�-J�'#� 241' ♦, - ar �r _. Lo -:r 4rE 90ring *c- !J' � di� �_ ' �♦' 4 lftd- } C� "In , Rk ''� .4•rr ' ' i, Cis:,: ne AS'C o w0mv-1woonk- low � �� (� \ 5+t 14a[cllrrJyyo - _ - u ♦ ri �� a T : a.,,►I ay■• `fy ,*+ y4'rl , II. P.vn E 'Hilfluk`♦,,:t EP r • .�. I ' SL r= rllhsr#an St R,a g SrF14171 7; ,I u Icy off■ c •I ►� , y - Orange , ■� Lk y UNWf�rKLcr'7 r chi Ye Anp, rSd A— I 'Q ,•Y � ' �• E hh t } .o-•-�81h1ti•I • f wa h Pdhhyru L: ' .: p M.:, ,♦, r - I. IF rr- • 'I • $$ 3L 4 h! 8ianl'■111 A- 2 rovly ■ 'ham � - _ 3 V�e7j Q - z � - • - G�1�� I rrWNrr � 3 t :, .• K I Ei1' : Sy► 1_STr■I r.V' : 0 ® E ♦'00■�■��� 5 - f vi Tustin ■ •-••IJ Ar. - Lrr:-/•,r Slluerdo aY7M71 Paax L11 , - - iill• .. r { • 7 ♦♦ ® m� {* ham. 3 r ; ■�.k� _ LP Y1,7r—r Aye � true• :� •.i -- - � A 'r,t ♦, I D i4' i•�i Fo I Ali i II,IL•YII ::•a f: La r�l., .r 44' 0.11cn / I + 41t - -._ •-r'r1r r Malley :13 f, N'I-A-Ihur EN- _ f `► PoltDl1� His it Fav •I,. I ._ Etnrac• 5•.� - '��'.� �P" 511 t * yr 1 €l Torn - �♦ .Ir Humin f'i1a5{a 0 2 4 8 Kilometers Miles 0 1.25 2.5 5 1, _ _ _ - - -_ J,c4 •k, M1 � R� • - ,;u. �'v eTarallf,. L�p3 • �'"+I■i k Y tr' n AV o F5Ya1er �y� Ci rte:` al LLr ¢r - �� "rte• fa1klolitr �� �i5`�' - i � +4w F•�iiv• . 4 r ,■/ , 09 } r PC. -Yorke IL r �$St the �i116�IQr} r • 4 I P I i7 OR v , , /'rr��o a t.. rw � ,♦ �' � � o *MtlenlLs,x ` 3 J .p Laguna ♦ '> I Sqq�■� ■�• C' WyG r� AI V Newport •.I '9 �6 Coast ♦M i� �u o- i}r jt ♦ �✓ t � a ♦` � 5 ,� ti S! k F , [ * s •� {��. rya}I, ao 1 � , ■ 1 7 - ••` `44 Tra bik o— >:, r: Y.s / MAI I4roF �aresl b '+1 Lzs Flares OII II II O I�`JI Q a� Q II II �a O W J H H U O O o f� Q 0 O 0 U LU V Q m o 0 O N CL m � O O rn J U co LU J z w o U ZLU � D D = U Q 0 IL m C 'i N W yam. V Q FIGURE X 6 M 0 0 ED - C14 C1l W U N J� My W O Q Z I M i< Q� VI IL I LU N L-0 rN0I- C14 0 0 N I 4 nv W LL O 4- L — 0 Q rV / N CX L V) / LU N LO 011 Susceptibility Potential Areas of Erosion, Habitat, & Physical Structure Susceptibility Channel Type Earth (Unstable) Earth (Stabilized) Stabilized Tidel Influence <= Mean High Water Line (4.28') Water Body Basin 0 Dam Lake Reservoir Other Lands 0 Airport/Military Santa Ana River Watershed AnaheimBay- Huntington Harbor Watershed f y�14 � �, 'Y• x conir, a, ■ L •� � �� -Jk A01 r i r � 4 � e �. dr - *nip- _ #x,rr ••�} � - �� U M lb-14Jtln 'f • . C 4 A l Pa[rfle 0Ad&; PnIEUN�H/RMW N5�p [Fc�4 4o riU n Ua�n f r r !X r r ..:011 Nev `v u:Jrr.J.Numuld NI6715n4wr.> . y,, .. Pn, 4' tlr• Cal 0 La9.9ui,nc Rcn■Itl w t■.���t •rMld.�m■c r - 9u o SmA L�g�ine Nya� South Orange County 0 4,000 8,0019 = Feet 16,000 7: • ,........ �:r �.5i.: r"lu I., -4V; �n O uL-d RIWIu S olli 9w,I—Hllc ��nl I^^�•^r t. • Q OD LJ O owlL. Intl pplR C ''I'' wC41 f c16r��nRNW47 flOr{G�rJ Mwr)M ` 0o MliaLBo-. R4dh r; ,y V �� drll�ciiuuuR WhMa� �.J HOLiuJlx.,hhc LasSo��:�,u. • 'iJi' Butlh(,Me0 I 'r� Ids Clil'ro-H.li ,}1•. O Lywrnrl S.i 1t F. Sp,Ings-o Smh Wimm, £hlnn Eml■kLr3da 9 Ui mill. sinI „ FQk y"''••'. LU �J wllawlalook •~r� r ': l' - ' U a prroow[ry Nurr'alk Ls NI Jd{ �dll pld rt Ea■I L�mpi6+, Ekil9aw I frrulrM Y•+'h,, _ . •p.� O �4 �a r� "' �Iln�rfOfiU ••. {'i4Lahle a„':4{V�tvuc � Q � ArLu 4l wix ul Q � Q Inn_-- Yr,ArM-.� ■..k O U x •p•n 77 m (] i.if O O I I I- I- Sbnu H 1 oW O N w J Q U 0 W E3 LLJ (D ZLU Q 0 �� ialllfe�GrocF ;off, a 7�#ill{Ir OZ m c I7 Bean 17 . W �■■i �W �Jt V !3-113mch { IM KFnirr^rr Q Santa Ana River �N�J■■X c1i. Watershed ..:011 Nev `v u:Jrr.J.Numuld NI6715n4wr.> . y,, .. Pn, 4' tlr• Cal 0 La9.9ui,nc Rcn■Itl w t■.���t •rMld.�m■c r - 9u o SmA L�g�ine Nya� South Orange County 0 4,000 8,0019 = Feet 16,000 �n O ��nl I^^�•^r Q OD LJ � O 0o a O 0 I — 1 � O a LU �J U O �a � Q � Q � Q O U CD m (] O O I I I- I- cl- m oW O N w J Q U 0 W E3 LLJ (D ZLU Q 0 U J U LU H 0 OZ m c G,7 W �Jt V Q FIGURE Storm Drain Signage SD -13 Design Objectives Maximize Infiltration Provide Retention Slow Runoff Minimize Impervious Land Coverage Q Prohibit Dumping of Improper Materials Contain Pollutants Collect and Convey Description Waste materials dumped into storm drain inlets can have severe impacts on receiving and ground waters. Posting notices regarding discharge prohibitions at storm drain inlets can prevent waste dumping. Storm drain signs and stencils are highly visible source controls that are typically placed directly adjacent to storm drain inlets. Approach The stencil or affixed sign contains a brief statement that prohibits dumping of improper materials into the urban runoff conveyance system. Storm drain messages have become a popular method of alerting the public about the effects of and the prohibitions against waste disposal. Suitable Applications Stencils and signs alert the public to the destination of pollutants discharged to the storm drain. Signs are appropriate in residential, commercial, and industrial areas, as well as any other area where contributions or dumping to storm drains is likely. Design Considerations Storm drain message markers or placards are recommended at all storm drain inlets within the boundary of a development project. The marker should be placed in clear sight facing toward anyone approaching the inlet from either side. All storm drain inlet locations should be identified on the development site map. Designing New Installations The following methods should be considered for inclusion in the project design and show on project plans: ■ Provide stenciling or labeling of all storm drain inlets and catch basins, constructed or modified, within the project area with prohibitive language. Examples include "NO DUMPING IF, V7<1 x-T0Rf ,111 1.1 Ek January 2003 California Stormwater BMP Handbook 1 of 2 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com SD -13 Storm Drain Signage — DRAINS TO OCEAN" and/or other graphical icons to discourage illegal dumping. ■ Post signs with prohibitive language and/or graphical icons, which prohibit illegal dumping at public access points along channels and creeks within the project area. Note - Some local agencies have approved specific signage and/or storm drain message placards for use. Consult local agency stormwater staff to determine specific requirements for placard types and methods of application. Redeveloping Existing Installations Various jurisdictional stormwater management and mitigation plans (SUSMP, WQMP, etc.) define "redevelopment" in terms of amounts of additional impervious area, increases in gross floor area and/or exterior construction, and land disturbing activities with structural or impervious surfaces. If the project meets the definition of "redevelopment", then the requirements stated under " designing new installations" above should be included in all project design plans. Additional Information Maintenance Considerations ■ Legibility of markers and signs should be maintained. If required by the agency with jurisdiction over the project, the owner/operator or homeowner's association should enter into a maintenance agreement with the agency or record a deed restriction upon the property title to maintain the legibility of placards or signs. Placement ■ Signage on top of curbs tends to weather and fade. ■ Signage on face of curbs tends to be worn by contact with vehicle tires and sweeper brooms Supplemental Information Examples ■ Most MS4 programs have storm drain signage programs. Some MS4 programs will provide stencils, or arrange for volunteers to stencil storm drains as part of their outreach program. Other Resources A Manual for the Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, May 2002. Model Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) for San Diego County, Port of San Diego, and Cities in San Diego County, February 14, 2002. Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, and the Incorporated Cities of Orange County, Draft February 2003. Ventura Countywide Technical Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures, .July 2002. 2 of 2 California Stormwater BMP Handbook January 2003 New Development and Redevelopment www.cabmphandbooks.com 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA Table 1.1 Proposed Volume -Based Biofiltration BMP Sizing Table Drainage %C design Design Subsurface Avg Total BMP Biofiltration Drawdown BMP Management g BMP Type yp Impervious p = (0.75 x capture Drainage Capture Storage Surface BMP Storage Rate, Period, Treatment (DMA) Area DMA = a x 100 ai + 0.15 ) storm Area, A Volume, Depth, D, Ponding Area, Volume, K design T DD Volume, depth, d Vdesign Depth, D2 ABMP VBMP VBMP-T (inches) (acres) ft 3 ft ft SF ft 3 in/hr hrs ft 3 Boxes & bioretention with A-1 underdrains 87% 0.80 0.74 3.18 6,855 3.5 0.50 3,647 6,929 2.5 24 18,235 Note: Stormwater Quality Design Capture Volume (DCV or Vdesign) was determined using Method (1) outlined in the 2011 Orange County Model Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Technical Guidance Document Vdesign = c x d x A x (1 ft/ 12in) x (43,560 ft2 / acre), where d = 0.73 inches (depth of rainfall for 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event) VBMP = ((n x D,) + D2) x ABMP where n is the porosity (% of voids) = 0.40 or 40% VBMP-T — ((Kdesign)/12) X TDD) X ABMP Biofiltration Rate is based on the specified loamy sand planting material with a minimum infiltration rate of 5 in/hr and factor of safety of 2 2MIR020100 12/22/2015 Volume -Based BMP Table Water Quality Management Plan (P-WQMP) 9755 Research Drive, Irvine, CA Section VII - Educational Materials Refer to the Orange County Stormwater Program (ocwatersheds.com) for a library of materials available. For the copy submitted to the Permittee, only attach the educational materials specifically applicable to the project. Other materials specific to the project may be included as well and must be attached. Education Materials Residential Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable Business Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door ® Tips for the Automotive Industry ❑ Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers ❑ Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar ❑ Tips for the Home Mechanic ❑ Tips for the Food Service Industry ❑ Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use ❑ Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business Household Tips ❑ Other Material Check If Attached Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste ❑ Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (North County) ❑ ❑ Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (Central County) ® ❑ Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (South County) ❑ ❑ Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System ❑ ❑ Responsible Pest Control ❑ ❑ Sewer Spill ® ❑ Tips for the Home Improvement Projects ❑ ❑ Tips for Horse Care ❑ ❑ Tips for Landscaping and Gardening ® ❑ Tips for Pet Care ❑ ❑ Tips for Pool Maintenance ❑ ❑ Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and Hardscape Drains ❑ ❑ Tips for Projects Using Paint ❑ ❑ Sanderson J. Ray Development Section II Page 36 F P R O J E C T POWAlOtA PRE V ENi1ONft Follow these simple steps to help reduce water pollution: Household Activities ■ Do not rinse spills with water. Use dry cleanup methods such as applying cat litter or another absorbent material, sweep and dispose of in the trash. Take items such as used or excess batteries, oven cleaners, automotive fluids, painting products and cathode ray tubes, like TVs and computer monitors, to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (HHWCC). ■ For a HHWCC near you call (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com. ■ Do not hose down your driveway, sidewalk or patio to the street, gutter or storm drain. Sweep up debris and dispose of it in the trash. Automotive ■ Take your vehicle to a commercial car wash whenever possible. If you wash your vehicle at home, choose soaps, cleaners, or detergents labeled non-toxic, phosphate- free or biodegradable. Vegetable and citrus -based products are typically safest for the environment. ■ Do not allow washwater from vehicle washing to drain into the street, gutter or storm drain. Excess washwater should be disposed of in the sanitary sewer (through a sink or toilet) or onto an absorbent surface like your lawn. ■ Monitor your vehicles for leaks and place a pan under leaks. Keep your vehicles well maintained to stop and prevent leaks. ■Never pour oil or antifreeze in the street, gutter or storm drain. Recycle these substances at a service station, a waste oil collection center or used oil recycling center. For the nearest Used Oil Collection Center call 1 -800 -CLEANUP or visit www.1800cleanup.org. Pool Maintenance ■ Pool and spa water must be dechlorinated and free of excess acid, alkali or color to be allowed in the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ When it is not raining, drain dechlorinated pool and spa water directly into the sanitary sewer. ■ Some cities may have ordinances that do not allow pool water to be disposed of in the storm drain. Check with your city. Landscape and Gardening ■ Do not over -water. Water your lawn and garden by hand to control the amount of water you use or set irrigation systems to reflect seasonal water needs. If water flows off your yard onto your driveway or sidewalk, your system is over -watering. Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers. ■ Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain. Instead, dispose of waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or as green waste through your city's recycling program. ■ Follow directions on pesticides and fertilizer, (measure, do not estimate amounts) and do not use if rain is predicted within 48 hours. ■ Take unwanted pesticides to a HHWCC to be recycled. For locations and hours of HHWCC, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com. Trash ■ Place trash and litter that cannot be recycled in securely covered trash cans. ■ Whenever possible, buy recycled products. ■ Remember: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. Pet Care ■Always pick up after your pet. Flush waste down the toilet or dispose of it in the trash. Pet waste, if left outdoors, can wash into the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ If possible, bathe your pets indoors. If you must bathe your pet outside, wash it on your lawn or another absorbent/permeable surface to keep the washwater from entering the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ Follow directions for use of pet care products and dispose of any unused products at a HHWCC. The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door 101, f +r ■ 4 ' I - jW RLP Ir L le 16 40 Never allow Pollutants to enter the street, gutter or storm drain! Did You Know? Sources of Non -Point Source Pollution The Effect on the Ocean ■ Most people believe that the largest source of water pollution in urban areas comes from specific sources such as factories and sewage treatment plants. In fact, the largest source of water pollution comes from city streets, neighborhoods, construction sites and parking lots. This type of pollution is sometimes called "non -point source" pollution. ■ There are two types of non -point source pollution: stormwater and urban runoff pollution. ■ Stormwater runoff results from rainfall. When rainstorms cause large volumes of water to rinse the urban landscape, picking up pollutants along the way. ■ Urban runoff can happen any time of the year when excessive water use from irrigation, vehicle washing and other sources carries trash, lawn clippings and other urban pollutants into storm drains. Where Does It Go? ■Anything we use outside homes, vehicles and businesses — like motor oil, paint, pesticides, fertilizers and cleaners — can be blown or washed into storm drains. ■A little water from a garden hose or rain can also send materials into storm drains. ■ Storm drains are separate from our sanitary sewer systems; unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks or toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. ■Automotive leaks and spills. ■ Improper disposal of used oil and other engine fluids. ■Metals found in vehicle exhaust, weathered paint, rust, metal plating and tires. ■ Pesticides and fertilizers from lawns, gardens and farms. ■ Improper disposal of cleaners, paint and paint removers. ■ Soil erosion and dust debris from landscape and construction activities. ■ Litter, lawn clippings, animal waste, and other organic matter. ■ Oil stains on parking lots and paved surfaces. Non -point source pollution can have a serious impact on water quality in Orange County. Pollutants from the storm drain system can harm marine life as well as coastal and wetland habitats. They can also degrade recreation areas such as beaches, harbors and bays. Stormwater quality management programs have been developed throughout Orange County to educate and encourage the public to protect water quality, monitor runoff in the storm drain system, investigate illegal dumping and maintain storm drains. Support from Orange County residents and businesses is needed to improve water quality and reduce urban runoff pollution. Proper use and disposal of materials will help stop pollution before it reaches the storm drain and the ocean. California Environmental Protection Agency www.calepa.ca.gov • Air Resources Board www.arb.ca.gov • Department of Pesticide Regulation www.cdpr.ca.gov • Department of Toxic Substances Control www.dtsc.ca.gov • Integrated Waste Management Board www.ciwmb.ca.gov • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment www.oehha.ca.gov • State Water Resources Control Board www.waterboards.ca.gov Earth 911 - Community -Specific Environmental Information 1 -800 -cleanup or visit www.1800cleanup. org Health Care Agency's Ocean and Bay Water Closure and Posting Hotline (714) 433-6400 or visit www.ocbeachinfo.com Integrated Waste Management Dept. of Orange County (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com for information on household hazardous waste collection centers, recycling centers and solid waste collection O.C. Agriculture Commissioner (714) 447-7100 or visit www.ocagcomm.com Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook Visit www.cabmphandbooks.com UC Master Gardener Hotline (714) 708-1646 or visit www.uccemg.com The Orange County Stormwater Program has created and moderates an electronic mailing list to facilitate communications, take questions and exchange ideas among its users about issues and topics related to stormwater and urban runoff and the implementation of program elements. To join the list, please send an email to ocstormwateiinfo-join@list.ocwatersheds.com Aliso Viejo ...................... (949) 425-2535 Anaheim Public Works Operations . . . . . . . . (714) 765-6860 Brea Engineering .................. (714) 990-7666 Buena Park Public Works ............. (714) 562-3655 Costa Mesa Public Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 754-5323 Cypress Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 229-6740 Dana Point Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (949) 248-3584 Fountain Valley Public Works ........... (714) 593-4441 Fullerton Engineering Dept ............. (714) 738-6853 Garden Grove Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 741-5956 Huntington Beach Public Works . . . . . . . . . (714) 536-5431 Irvine Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (949) 724-6315 La Habra Public Services .............. (562) 905-9792 La Palma Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 690-3310 Laguna Beach Water Quality............ (949) 497-0378 Laguna Hills Public Services . . . . . . . . . . . . (949) 707-2650 Laguna Niguel Public Works ........... (949) 3624337 Laguna Woods Public Works. . . . . . . . . . . . (949) 639-0500 Lake Forest Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . (949) 461-3480 Los Alamitos Community Dev.. . . . . . . . . . . (562) 431-3538 Mission Viejo Public Works ............ (949) 470-3056 Newport Beach, Code & Water Quality Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (949) 644-3215 Orange Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 532-6480 Placentia Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 993-8245 Rancho Santa Margarita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (949) 635-1800 San Clemente Environmental Programs . . . . . (949) 361-6143 San Juan Capistrano Engineering . . . . . . . . . (949) 234-4413 Santa Ana Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 647-3380 Seal Beach Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . (562) 431-2527 x317 Stanton Public Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 379-9222 x204 Tustin Public Works/Engineering. . . . . . . . . (714) 573-3150 Villa Park Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 998-1500 Westminster Public Works/Engineering . . . . (714) 898-3311 x446 Yorba Linda Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714) 961-7138 Orange County Stormwater Program . . . . . . . (877) 897-7455 Orange County 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) On-line Water Pollution Problem Reporting Form w w w. o c w a t e r s h e d s. c o m ry L +-;1LW L r lt A Did you know that just i .:k. one quart of oil can pollute 250,000 gallons of water? A clean ocean and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and beaches are important to Orange County. However, not properly disposing of used oil can lead to water pollution. If you pour or drain oil onto driveways, sidewalks or streets, it can be washed into the storm drain. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering the ocean. Help prevent water pollution by taking your used oil to a used oil collection center. Included in this brochure is a list of locations that will accept up to five gallons of used motor oil at no cost. M any also accept used oil filters. Please contact the facility before delivering your used oil. This listing of companies is for your reference and does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of the company. Please note that used oil filters may not be disposed of with regular household trash. They must be taken to a household hazardous waste collection or recycling center in Anaheim, Huntington Beach, Irvine or San Juan Capistrano. For information about these centers, visit www.oclandfills.com. Please do not mix your oil with other substances! For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.watersheds.com. For information about the proper disposal of household hazardous waste, call the Household Waste Hotline at (714) 834-6752 or visit www.ociandfills.com. it RECYCLE USED OIL For additional information about the nearest oil recycling center, call the Used Oil Program at 1 -800 -CLEANUP or visit www.cleanup.org. DTPM Rev 8/03 printed on recycled paper #64 - WW�A,01, • ri r; I. • r � r��rF �k1� •'' � P R O J E C T P0344+10tA P R E V E N T I O N Balboa Hill's Boat Service 814 E Bay Ave., Balboa, CA 92661 (949)675-0740() CIWMB# 30-C-03538 Balboa Island Island Marine Fuel 406 S Bay Front, Balboa Island, CA 92662 (949)673-1103() CIWMB#: 30-C-03728 Corona Del Mar Corona Del Mar 76 2201 E. Pacific Coast Hwy., Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 (949)673-3320() CIWMB#: 30-C-06620 Corona Del Mar Chevron 2546 E. Coast Hwy., Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 (949)195-0774(14) CIWMB#: 30-C-06424 Mobil (Harbor View) 2500 San Joaquin Hills Rd., Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 (949)640-4759() CIWMB#: 30-C-03363 Costa Mesa AutoZone #5520 744 W. 19th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (901)495-71590 CIWMB#: 30-C-05992 Big O Tires #5571 3181 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (949)443-4155() CIWMB#: 30-C-04676 Big O Tires #694 322 E. 17th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)642-4131( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05811 Coast General Performance 2855 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)540-5710() CIWMB#: 30-C-05916 Connell Chevrolet 2828 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)546-1200() CIWMB#: 30-C-06286 EZ Lube Inc #15 3599 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)966-1647() CIWMB#: 30-C-03137 EZ Lube Inc #46 400 E 17th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (714)556-1312() CIWMB#: 30-C-05779 EZ Lube Inc. #44 2248 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (714)556-1312() CIWMB#: 30-C-05737 Firestone Store #71T7 475 E 17th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)646-2444() CIWMB#: 30-C-02120 Jiffy Lube #1969 300 E 17th St., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)548-2505() CIWMB#: 30-C-05553 Jiffy Lube #861 375 Bristol St., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)557-5823() CIWMB#: 30-C-05552 Kragen Auto Parts #0725 1739 Superior Ave., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)642-3384() CIWMB#: 30-C-02624 Kragen Auto Parts #0796 1175 Baker Blvd., Unit E, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)662-2005() CIWMB#: 30-C-02664 Nabem Cadillac 2600 Harbor Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)444-52000 CIWMB#: 30-C-05051 Oil Stop Inc. Oil Stop Inc. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)434-8350() CIWMB#: 30-C-06293 Pep Boys #660 2946 Bristol St., Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)549-1533( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-03416 Plaza Chevron Service Center 3048 Bristol Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)545-42570 CIWMB#: 30-C-01123 Scher Tire Inc #15 dba Goodyear Tire 1596 Newport Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949)548-9384() CIWMB#: 30-C-03034 Fountain Valley Firestone Store #7147 17975 Magnolia Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)842-33410 CIWMB#: 30-C-01219 Golden Shell 8520 Warner Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)842-71500 CIWMB#: 30-P-05002 Kragen Auto Parts #0734 9880 Warner Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)964-6427() CIWMB#: 30-C-02609 Kragen Auto Parts #1505 16147 Harbor Blvd., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)531-8525() CIWMB#: 30-C-04125 Oil Can Henry's 9525 Warner Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)473-7705() CIWMB#: 30-C-05843 Punfect Auto Service #10 16780 Harbor Blvd., Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)839-3899() CIWMB#: 30-C-01380 Huntington Beach AutoZone #5528 6800 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)891-8211() CIWMB#: 30-C-04777 Bella Terra Car Wash 16061 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA92647 Jiffy Lube #1970 (714)847-4924() CIWMB#: 30-C-03035 2175 Newport Blvd., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 CIWMB#: 30-C-06195 Zito's Auto Care (949)548-4150() 19002 Magnolia St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Villa Park CIWMB#: 30-C-05554 Big OTires #553 (714)968-8788() Phil's Villa Park 76 19411 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CIWMB#: 30-C-03251 17771 Santiago Blvd., Villa Park, CA9 Jiffy Lube #607 (714)536-7571() (714)637-0854() 2255 Fairview Rd., Costa Mesa, CA 92627 CIWMB#: 30-C-00970 CIWMB#: 30-C-06579 (949)650-5823() CIWMB#: 30-C-05551 This information was provided by the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management Department and the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). Econo Lube N' Tune #26 19961 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)536-6519() CIWMB#: 30-C-06117 Expertec Automotive 7680 TabertAve SuileA& B, Huntington Beads, CA 92648 (714)848-9222() CIWMB#: 30-C-05914 EZ Lube Inc #16 7361 Edinger Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)899-3600() CIWMB#: 30-C-03289 EZ Lube Inc. 979 9862 Adams St., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)556-1312() CIWMB#: 30-C-06547 Firestone Store #71T5 16171 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)847-6081( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-02118 Huntington Beach Car Wash 18971 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)847-4924() CIWMB#: 30-C-05303 Jiffy Lube #1857 8971 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)596-7213() CIWMB#: 30-C-05053 Kragen Auto Parts #1468 10072 Adams Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (714)593-6156() CIWMB#: 30-C-04284 Kragen Auto Parts #1511 7171 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)842-0531( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04129 Kragen Auto Parts #1633 18888 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)965-2353() CIWMB#: 30-C-02645 Oilmax 10 Minute LubelWash 9862 Adams Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (714)964-7110() CIWMB#: 30-C-03219 Pep Boys #799 19122 Brookhurst St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (714)964-0777() CIWMB#: 30-C-03439 Oulk Change Lube & Oil 5841 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92649 (714)840-2331() CIWMB#: 30-C-03208 R Kids Tire and Service #6 5062 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)846-1189() CIWMB#: 30-C-05691 Saturn of Huntington Beach 18801 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)841-5428() CIWMB#: 30-C-05221 USA Express Tire & Service Inc 7232 Edinger Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714)842-0717() CIWMB#: 30-C-04429 Irvine Firestone Store #71W4 51 Auto Center Dr., Irvine, CA 92618 (949)829-8710() CIWMB#: 30-C-03689 Irvine City Auto Parts 14427 Culver Dr., Irvine, CA 92604 (949)551-5588() CIWMB#: 30-C-02186 Jiffy Lube #1856 Irvine Spectrum 8777 Irvine Center Dr., Irvine, CA 92618 (949)753-0485() CIWMB#: 30-C-06094 Jiffy Lube #1988 3080 Main St., Irvine, CA 92614 (714)961-5491(27 ) CIWMB#: 30-C-04450 Kragen Auto Parts #4174 15315 Culver Dr., Ste.#170, Irvine, CA 92604 (602)631-7115() CIWMB#: 30-C-06417 Newport Beach Jiffy Lube #2811 1520 W Coast Hwy., Newport Beach, CA 92663 (949)764-9255() CIWMB#: 30-C-05629 Newport Landing Fuel Dock 503 E Edgewater Newport Beach, CA 92661 (949)673-7878() CIWMB#: 30-C-03628 Orange AutoZone #5942 1330 N. Glassell Orange, CA 92867 (714)538-45510 CIWMB#: 30-C-04553 Big O Tires #570 1825 E Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)538-0016() CIWMB#: 30-C-00974 David Wllsons Ford of Orange 1350 W Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)633-6731() CIWMB#: 30-C-02341 EZ Lube #74 3232 Chapman Ave. #E, Orange, CA 92869 (714)556-1312(106) CIWMB#: 30-C-06627 Firestone Store #7185 1690 N Tustin Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)282-8144() CIWMB#: 30-C-0122 Jiffy Lube #1457 433 W. Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)720-5757() CIWMB#: 30-C-06280 Kragen Auto Parts #1764 910 Tustin St., Orange, CA 92867 (714)771-3000() CIWMB#: 30-C-02625 Managed Mobile, Inc. 1030 N Batavia St., #B, Orange, CA 92867 (714)400-0250() CIWMB# 30-C-05776 Pep Boys #806 215 E Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (774)997-1540() CIWMB#: 30-C-01759 Santiago Hills Car Care 8544 East Chapman Ave., Orange, CA 92869 (714)919-1060( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05622 Scher Tire 933 1821 E. Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (909)343-3100() CIWMB#: 30-G-06324 Tabassi Shell Service Station 830 E Katella Ave., Orange, CA 92867 (714)771-6990() CIWMB#: 30-C-00552 The Tune-up Center 193 S Main St., Orange, CA 92868 (714)633-1876() CIWMB#: 30-C-02091 Tony's Fuel and Towing 1650 W La Veta Ave., Orange, CA 92868 (714)953-7676() CIWMB#: 30-C-00868 Truck Lubrication Company 143 S. Pixley Orange, CA 92868 (714)997-7730() CIWMB#: 30-C-06001 Santa Ana All Phase Environmental 910 E. Fourth St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)731-5995() CIWMB#: 30-C-06116 Archie's Tire & Towing 4518 Westminster Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92703 (714)636-4518() CIWMB#: 30-C-02058 AutoZone #3320 2007 S. Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92707 (901)195-7217( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06508 AutoZone #5232 430 W 17th Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714)547-7003() CIWMB#: 30-C-04609 AutoZone #5538 1101 S Bristol Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)241-0335() CIWMB#: 30-C-00829 Big O Tires 1211 W. Warner Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92707 (714)540-8646() CIWMB#: 30-C-04679 Big O Tires #712 1302 E. 17th St., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)541-6811() CIWMB#: 30-C-05813 Firestone Store #7175 3733 S Bristol Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)549-4015() CIWMB#: 30-C-01223 Firestone Store #71TA 101 S Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)542-8857() CIWMB#: 30-C-02123 Firestone Store #7111116 2005 N Tustin Ave., Ste A, Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)541-7977() CIWMB#: 30-C-03688 Guaranty Chevrolet Motors Inc. 711 E 17th St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)973-1711(277 ) CIWMB#: 30-C-06506 Jiffy Lube #1303 2025 N. Tustin Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)720-5757() CIWMB#: 30-C-06283 John's Mobil 1465 S Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92707 (714)835-3266() CIWMB#: 30-C-00578 Kragen Auto Parts #0736 1302 E 17th St., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)953-6061() CIWMB#: 30-C-02610 Kragen Auto Parts #1253 1400 W Edinger Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)754-1432() CIWMB#: 30-C-02627 Kragen Auto Parts #1376 521 W 17th St., Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714)543-4492() CIWMB#: 30-C-03901 Kragen Auto Parts #1516 2337 S Bristol Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)557-0787() CIWMB#: 30-C-04106 Kragen Auto Parts #1648 1015 S Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)568-1570( ) CIWMB#: 30-C-05664 Pep Boys #609 120 E 1st St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714)547-7477() CIWMB#: 30-C-01738 Pep Boys #802 1107 S Harbor Blvd., Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714)775-0828() CIWMB#: 30-C-01739 Purrfect Auto Service 2519 S Main St., Santa Ana, CA 92707 (714)549-7900() CIWMB#: 30-C-02085 Saturn of Santa Ana 1350 Auto Mall Dr., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)648-2444() CIWMB#: 30-C-05222 Scher Tire #28 1805 N Grand Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714)558-8644() CIWMB#: 30-C-03225 Tustin Big O Tires #555 131 E 1st St., Tustin, CA 92780 (714)544-9431() CIWMB#: 30-C-00972 EZ Lube #42 12972 Newport Ave., Tustin, CA 92780 (714)556-1312() CIWMB#: 30-C-06408 Jiffy Lube #1406 3087 Edinger Ave., Tustin, CA 92780 (949)651-88140 CIWMB#: 30-C-03778 Kragen Auto Parts #1533 502 B E 1st St., Tustin, CA 92780 (714)544-9249() CIWMB#: 30-C-04128 Scher Tire Inc #17 dba Goodyear Tire 14511 Redhill Ave., Tustin, CA 92780 (714)832-6011() 2861 Sewage Spill Regulatory Requirements Orange County Stormwater Program 24 Hour Water Pollution Reporting Hotline 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) County and city water quality ordinances prohibit discharges containing pollutants. Orange County Health Care Agency Environmental Health (714) 433-6419 California Health and Safety Code, Sections 5410-5416 • No person shall discharge raw or treated sewage or other waste in a mannerthat results in contamination, pollution or a nuisance. • Any person who causes or permits a sewage discharge to any state waters: • must immediately notify the local health agency of the discharge. • shall reimburse the local health agency for services that protect the public's health and safety (water -contact receiving waters). • who fails to provide the required notice to the local health agency is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine (between $500—$1,000) and/or imprisonmentfor lessthan oneyear. Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region San Diego Region (951) 782-4130 (858) 467-2952 • Requires the prevention, mitigation, response to and reporting of sewage spills. California Office of Emergency Services (800) 852-7550 California Water Code, Article 4, Chapter 4, Sections 13268-13271 California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 9.2, Article 2, Sections 2250-2260 Any person who causes or permits sewage in excess of 1,000 gallons to be discharged to state waters shall immediately notify the Office of Emergency Services. Any person who fails to provide the notice required by this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine (less than $20,000) and/or imprisonment for not morethan oneyear. ............. A6 printed on recycled paper V q, What is a Sewage Spill? Sewage spills occur when the wastewater being transported via underground pipes overflows through a manhole, cleanout or broken pipe. Sewage spills can cause health hazards, damage to homes and businesses, Overflowin cleanout pig and threaten the environment, local waterways and located o. beaches. private property Common Causes of Sewage Spills Grease builds up inside and eventually blocks sewer pipes. Grease gets into the sewer from food establishments, household drains, as well as from poorly maintained commercial grease traps and interceptors. Structure problems caused by tree roots in the lines, broken/cracked pipes, missing or broken cleanout caps or undersized sewers can cause blockages. Infiltration and inflow (1/1) impacts pipe capacity and is caused when groundwater or rainwater enters the sewer system through pipe defects and illegal connections. You Are Responsible for a Sewage Spill Caused by a Blockage or Break in Your Sewer Lines! Time is of the essence in dealing with sewage spills. You are required to immediately: Control and minimize the spill. Keep spills contained on private property and out of gutters, storm drains and public waterways by shutting off or not using the water. Use sandbags, dirt and/or plastic sheeting to prevent sewage from entering the storm drain system. Clear the sewer blockage. Always wear gloves and wash your hands. It is recommended that a plumbing professional be called for clearing blockages and making necessary repairs. Always notify your city sewer/public works department or public sewer district of sewage spills. If the spill enters the storm drains also notify the Health Care Agency. In addition, if it exceeds 1,000 gallons notify the Office of Emergency Services. Refer to the numbers listed in this brochure. You Could Be Liable Allowing sewage from your home, business or property to discharge to a gutter or storm drain may subject you to penalties and/or out-of-pocket costs to reimburse cities or public agencies for clean-up and enforcement efforts. See Regulatory Codes ft Fines section for pertinent codes and fines that apply. What to Look For Sewage spills can be a very noticeable gushing of water from a manhole or a slow water leak that may take time to be noticed. Don't dismiss unaccounted-for wet areas. Lookfor: • Drain backups inside the building. • Wet ground and water leaking around manhole lids onto your street. • Leaking water from cleanouts or outside drains. • Unusual odorous wet areas: sidewalks, external walls or ground/landscape around a building. Caution Keep people and pets away from the affected area. Untreated sewage has high levels of disease -causing viruses and bacteria. Call your local health care agency listed on the backfor more information. If You See a Sewage Spill Occurring, Notify Your City Sewer/Public Works Department or Public Sewer District IMMEDIATELY! Preventing Grease Qlockages The drain is not a dump! Recycle or dispose of grease properly and never pour grease down the drain. Homeowners should mix fats, oils and grease with absor- bent waste materials such as paper, coffee grounds, or kitty litter and place it in the trash. Wipe food scraps from plates and pans and dump them in the trash. Restaurants and commercial food service establishments should always use "Kitchen Best Management Practices." These include: • Collecting all cooking grease and liquid oil from pots, pans and fryers in covered grease containersfor recycling. • Scraping or dry -wiping excess food and grease from dishes, pots, pans and fryers into the trash. • Installing drain screens on all kitchen drains. • Having spill kits readily available for cleaning up spills. • Properly maintaining grease traps or interceptors by having them serviced regularly. Check your local city codes. Report Sewage Spills! City Sewer/Public Works Departments Aliso Viejo ......................... BUSINESS Anaheim ........................... (714)765-6860 Brea .............................. Orange County How a Sewer (714)562-3655 Costa Mesa ........................ (949)645-8400 Grease Trap Cleanout Agency Responsibilities Works M Fountain Valley ..................... (714) 593-4600 ole (714)738-6897 Garden Grove ....................... (714)741-5375 City Sewer/Public Works Departments— A property owner's sewer pipes are called RESIDENCE Responsible for protecting city property service laterals and are connected to larger Private and streets, the local storm drain system, sewage local main and regional trunk lines. Service Downspout SerLat vials collection system and other public areas. laterals run from the connection at the (rain water goes into La Habra ........................... home to the connection with the public the storm drain system, not the sewer) cleanout Public Sewer/Sanitation District— sewer (including the area under the street). (714) 690-3310 Responsible for collecting, treating and disposing These laterals are the responsibility of the ` Local Main of wastewater. property owner and must be maintained Sewer Line • County of Orange Health Care Agency— by the property owner. Many city agencies Orange County ...................... Responsible for protecting public health by closing have adopted ordinances requiring Manhole ocean/bay waters and may close food-service maintenance of service laterals. Check with San Clemente ....................... businesses if spill poses a threatto public health. your city sewer/local public works - Santa Ana ......................... departmentfor more information. Seal Beach ......................... . Regional Water Quality Control Boards— Stanton ........................... (714)379-9222 Responsiblefor protecting Statewaters. Operation and maintenance of local and Villa Park .......................... (714) 998-1500 regional sewer lines are the responsi- (714) 893-3553 . Orange County Stormwater Program— bility of the city sewer/public works depart- Regional Responsible for preventing harmful pollutants from ments and public sewer districts. Trunk line Wastewater being discharged or washed by stormwater runoff Sewer Treatment into the municipal storm drain system, creeks, bays Plant t and the ocean. Preventing Grease Qlockages The drain is not a dump! Recycle or dispose of grease properly and never pour grease down the drain. Homeowners should mix fats, oils and grease with absor- bent waste materials such as paper, coffee grounds, or kitty litter and place it in the trash. Wipe food scraps from plates and pans and dump them in the trash. Restaurants and commercial food service establishments should always use "Kitchen Best Management Practices." These include: • Collecting all cooking grease and liquid oil from pots, pans and fryers in covered grease containersfor recycling. • Scraping or dry -wiping excess food and grease from dishes, pots, pans and fryers into the trash. • Installing drain screens on all kitchen drains. • Having spill kits readily available for cleaning up spills. • Properly maintaining grease traps or interceptors by having them serviced regularly. Check your local city codes. Report Sewage Spills! City Sewer/Public Works Departments Aliso Viejo ......................... (949) 425-2500 Anaheim ........................... (714)765-6860 Brea .............................. (714)990-7691 Buena Park ........................ (714)562-3655 Costa Mesa ........................ (949)645-8400 Cypress ........................... (714)229-6760 Dana Point ......................... (949)248-3562 Fountain Valley ..................... (714) 593-4600 Fullerton ........................... (714)738-6897 Garden Grove ....................... (714)741-5375 Huntington Beach ................... (714)536-5921 Irvine ............................. (949) 453-5300 Laguna Beach ...................... (949)497-0765 Laguna Hills ........................ (949)707-2650 Laguna Niguel ...................... (949)362-4337 Laguna Woods ...................... (949)639-0500 La Habra ........................... (562)905-9792 Lake Forest .................... (949) 461-3480 La Palma .......................... (714) 690-3310 Los Alamitos ....................... (562) 431-3538 Mission Viejo ....................... (949) 831-2500 Newport Beach ..................... (949) 644-3011 Orange ............................ (714)532-6480 Orange County ...................... (714)567-6363 Placentia .......................... (714) 993-8245 Rancho Santa Margarita............ (949) 635-1800 San Clemente ....................... (949) 366-1553 San Juan Capistrano ................ (949) 443-6363 Santa Ana ......................... (714)647-3380 Seal Beach ......................... (562)431-2527 Stanton ........................... (714)379-9222 Tustin ............................. (714)962-2411 Villa Park .......................... (714) 998-1500 Westminster ....................... (714) 893-3553 Yorba Linda ........................ (714)961-7170 Public Sewer/Water Districts Costa Mesa Sanitary District .......... (714) 393-4433/ (949) 645-8400 EI Toro Water District ................ (949) 837-0660 Emerald Bay Service District .......... (949) 494-8571 Garden Grove Sanitary District ......... (714) 741-5375 Irvine Ranch Water District ............ (949) 453-5300 Los Alamitos/Rossmoor Sewer District ... (562) 431-2223 Midway City Sanitary District (Westminster) (714) 893-3553 Moulton Niguel Water District ......... (949) 831-2500 Orange County Sanitation District....... (714) 962-2411 Santa Margarita Water District ........ (949) 459-6420 South Coast Water District ............ (949) 499-4555 South Orange County Wastewater Authority (949) 234-5400 Sunset Beach Sanitary District......... (562) 493-9932 Trabuco Canyon Sanitary District ....... (949) 858-0277 Yorba Linda Water District ............ (714) 777-3018 Other Agencies Orange County Health Care Agency ..... (714) 433.6419 Office of Emernencv Services.......... 18001852-7550 lean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many common activities can lead to water pollution if you're not careful. Fertilizers, pesticides and other chemicals that are left on yards or driveways can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Overwatering lawns can also send materials into storm drains. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never pour gardening products into the ocean, so don't let them enter the storm drains. Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Never allow gardening products or polluted water to enter the street, gutter or storm drain. General Landscaping Tips ■ Protect stockpiles and materials from wind and rain by storing them under tarps or secured plastic sheeting. ■Prevent erosion of slopes by planting fast-growing, dense ground covering plants. These will shield and bind the soil. ■Plant native vegetation to reduce the amount of water, fertilizers, and pesticide applied to the landscape. ■Never apply pesticides or fertilizers when rain is predicted within the next 48 hours. Garden & Lawn Maintenance ■Do not overwater. Use irrigation practices such as drip irrigation, soaker hoses or micro spray systems. Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers. ■ Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain. Instead, dispose of green waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or recycling it through your city's program. ■ Use slow-release fertilizers to minimize leaching, and use organic fertilizers. ■ Read labels and use only as directed. Do not over -apply pesticides or fertilizers. Apply to spots as needed, rather than blanketing an entire area. ■ Store pesticides, fertilizers and other chemicals in a dry covered area to prevent exposure that may result in the deterioration of containers and packaging. ■ Rinse empty pesticide containers and re -use rinse water as you would use the product. Do not dump rinse water down storm drains. Dispose of empty containers in the trash. ■ When available, use non-toxic alternatives to traditional pesticides, and use pesticides specifically designed to control the pest you are targeting. For more information, visit www.ipm.ucdavis.edu. ■ If fertilizer is spilled, sweep up the spill before irrigating. If the spill is liquid, apply an absorbent material such as cat litter, and then sweep it up and dispose of it in the trash. ■ Take unwanted pesticides to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center to be recycled. Locations are provided below. Preventing water pollution at your commercial/industrial site Clean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many landscape and building maintenance activities can lead to water pollution if you're not careful. Paint, chemicals, plant clippings and other materials can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never pour soap or fertilizers into the ocean, so why would you let them enter the storm drains? Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Some types of industrial facilities are required to obtain coverage under the State General Industrial Permit. For more information visit: www.swrcb.ca.gov/stormwater/industrial.html For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com To report a spill, call the Orange County 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) . For emergencies, dial 911. RECYCLE USED OIL Printed on Recycled Paper The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door P R O J E C T POMAIO" P R E V E N T I O N Landscape Maintenance ■ Compost grass clippings, leaves, sticks and other vegetation, or dispose of it at a permitted landfill or in green waste containers. Do not dispose of these materials in the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ Irrigate slowly and inspect the system for leaks, overspraying and runoff. Adjust automatic timers to avoid overwatering. ■ Follow label directions for the use and disposal of fertilizers and pesticides. ■ Do not apply pesticides or fertilizers if rain is expected within 48 hours or if wind speeds are above 5 mph. ■ Do not spray pesticides within 100 feet of waterways. ■ Fertilizers should be worked into the soil rather than dumped onto the surface. ■ If fertilizer is spilled on the pavement or sidewalk, sweep it up immediately and place it back in the container. Building Maintenance ■ Never allow washwater, sweepings or sediment to enter the storm drain. ■ Sweep up dry spills and use cat litter, towels or similar materials to absorb wet spills. Dispose of it in the trash. ■ If you wash your building, sidewalk or parking lot, you must contain the water. Use a shop vac to collect the water and contact your city or sanitation agency for proper disposal information. Do not let water enter the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ Use drop cloths underneath outdoor painting, scraping, and sandblasting work, and properly dispose of materials in the trash. ■ Use a ground cloth or oversized tub for mixing paint and cleaning tools. ■ Use a damp mop or broom to clean floors. ■ Cover dumpsters to keep insects, animals, rainwater and sand from entering. Keep the area around the dumpster clear of trash and debris. Do not overfill the dumpster. ■ Call your trash hauler to replace leaking dumpsters. ■ Do not dump any toxic substance or liquid waste on the pavement, the ground, or near a storm drain. Even materials that seem harmless such as latex paint or biodegradable cleaners can damage the environment. ■ Recycle paints, solvents and other materials. For more information about recycling and collection centers, visit www.ociandfills.com. ■ Store materials indoors or under cover and away from storm drains. ■ Use a construction and demolition recycling company to recycle lumber, paper, cardboard, metals, masonry, carpet, plastic, pipes, drywall, rocks, dirt, and green waste. For a listing of construction and demolition recycling locations in your area, visit www.ciwmb.ca.gov/recycle. ■ Properly label materials. Familiarize employees with Material P R O J E G T Safety Data Sheets. PC)Bt4fiOn P R E V E N T 1 0 N rE GEOTECHNICAL C PROFESSIONALS INC December 2, 2015 Sanderson/J. Ray Development Co. 2699 White Road, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92714 Attention: Mr. James "Walkie" Ray Subject: Subsurface Infiltration of Storm Water 375 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, California GPI Project No. 2664 Dear Mr. Ray.- At ay:At the request of Ms. Annette Wiley of Wiley Architects, we have evaluated the feasibility of infiltrating storm water at the subject site. We understand that the existing site facilities were constructed in the late 1980's and the site will be redeveloped for a self -storage facility and a restaurant. An evaluation of the subsurface infiltration potential is required for the proposed re -development of the site. SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS Our evaluation of the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions is based on the referenced geotechnical investigation report by Converse Consultants for the existing development, as well as published geologic information. The soil profile at the site consist of man-made fills overlying young alluvium, deposited in the original natural channel of Delhi Drainage Ditch. The referenced Converse report, indicates that the man-made fills extended from the ground surface to elevations ranging from +17 to +21 feet. Based on the current ground surface elevation of +33 to +34 feet, the current depth of fill ranges from 13 to 16 feet below the ground surface. The fill materials consist mostly of clayey sands and sandy clay. At the time of the geotechnical investigation in 1986, the existing uncontrolled fill exhibited variable compaction, but was generally described as loose to medium dense with less than 90 percent relative compaction. We understand that the undocumented fills were partially removed and replaced with compacted fills in building areas only. The natural soils (alluvium) underlying the fills consist mostly of organic clays with peat. Limited layers of silty sand were found below the clay layers at depths greater than about 28 feet below the existing ground surface. Regional mapping performed as part of the Orange County Infiltration Study indicates that the Hydrologic Soil Group of the soils at the site is D. This group of soils is consistent with the soils described above, which are considered to have very low infiltration rates 2664-01 L.doc 5736 Corporate Avenue • Cypress, CA 90630 • (71 4) 220-2211 • FAX (71 4) 220-21 22 Sanderson/J. Ray Development Co. Subsurface Infiltration of Storm Water, Costa Mesa, California December2, 2015 GPI Proiect No. 2664 (practically impervious). Figure XVI -2a from the referenced County Guidelines is enclosed. Groundwater was encountered in the Converse Consultants borings at elevations ranging between +12 and +19 feet, corresponding to depths of 14 to 19 feet below the current ground surface, and typically 3 feet below the bottom of the fills. CONCLUSIONS Based on information presented above, from a geotechnical point of view, subsurface infiltration of storm water is not feasible at the site for the following reasons: Based on both the results of the site-specific geotechnical investigation by Converse Consultants and the regional mapping, the site soils can be expected to have very low infiltration rates. The County guidelines indicate that site specific infiltration testing is not required to justify the low infiltration potential, when site- specific geotechnical information is consistent with D soils, which is the case for this site. 2. Infiltration of water into the "loose" undocumented fills could cause detrimental differential ground subsidence and damage to surface improvements. On the other hand, infiltration of water into the compacted cohesive fills could cause differential ground heave with similar damaging results. 3. Infiltration into the natural soils below the fills is not feasible, both because of the low potential infiltration rate, as well as the fact that the groundwater level is typically within 3 feet below the bottom of the fills. We trust that this report will present an adequate assessment of the subsurface infiltration potential at the site based on existing geotechnical and hydrologic information. Please call the undersigned if you have any questions on the contents of this report or need any additional geotechnical information. Respectfully submitted by, Geotechnical Professionals Inc. Byron Konstantinidis, G.E. Principal BK:sph 9YOFESg�� N S iu m No. GE 482 c'n " r � Exp. 12/31/15 � �' 4 �`* 0A 9T ?F CAO1 DEC W- 2 2D15 Enclosures: References Figure XVI -2a (NRCS Hydrologic Soil Groups) Sanderson/J. Ray Development Co. Subsurface Infiltration of Storm Water, Costa Mesa, California REFERENCES December2, 2015 GPI Project No. 2664 Converse Consultants Orange County, "Geotechnical Study, Proposed Bristol Service Center, Costa Mesa, California," CCOC Project No. 86-32323-01; January 15, 1987. 2. County of Orange, "Technical Guidance Document for the Preparation of Conceptual/Preliminary and/or Project Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs), May 19, 2011. 3 IT A�— OUNJE9V M FUHUMEM NIFE KNOM IL LEGEND 1.•dCity Boundaries 71� F..1 P. Hydrologic Soil Groups La Mirada op-INM ... k 0 A Soils B Soils Z.1 C Soils D Soils Source: Soils: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey - soil_ca678, Orange County & Western Riverside CE (4j," Date of publication: 2006-02-08 hftp://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm k L. -- LOA. Va"— nkp 0 aa%a.. 1P 0 2.5 5 10 Kliomefers () Miles 6 1.8 3.6 72 jjjjjjFF2:&2lr BF, � L Li 7 AWL a- Rap R)o C"ox J. APPENDIX F Transportation and Traffic Data Bristol Mini -Storage Facility (744 units) and Food Court Building (5,000 sq. ft.) ESA / 150652 Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration May 2016 July 21, 2015 Engineers & Planners Traffic Transportation Parking Mr. Walkie Ray Sanderson JRay Development Corporation 2699 White Road E & Greenspan, Greenspan, Engineers Irvine, CA 92614 2 Executive Circle LLG Reference: 2.14.3518.1 Suite 250 Irvine, GA 92614 Subject: Trip Generation Assessment for the Bristol Autoplex Site 941825.61757 Proposed Bristol Food Market and Bristol Storage Project 949.825.6178 F Costa Mesa, California www.Ilgengineers.com Dear Mr. Ray: Pasadena Irvine San Diego As requested, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Woodland Hills Trip Generation Assessment for the Bristol Autoplex site. The Autoplex site is located at 375 Bristol Street, generally southwest of John Wayne Orange County Airport, east of Red Hill Avenue and the Ayres Hotel, and west of the 18 -hole executive Newport Beach Golf Course. The site totals roughly 3.2 acres and is currently developed with a mix of commercial floor area historically targeted to automotive -related tenancies. This letter addresses the expected variation in site's existing baseline traffic generation potential due to the proposed redevelopment of the site to construct 98,800 SF of self -storage space and a supporting 1,200 SF ground -floor management office in a two-level 100,000 SF building. The plan also calls for a food market providing an additional 5,000 SF of floor area expected to be occupied by a mix of gourmet - oriented tenancies. Our analysis presents the site's existing trip generation characteristics based on actual traffic counts at the two project driveways, with those counts corresponding to an existing site floor area vacancy of approximately 16%. These field study results are then compared to three other forecast scenarios: those extrapolated for a fully - occupied existing development condition; the forecasted trip -making potential for the Philip M. Linscott, PE(1924-2606) site due to its proposed Project redevelopment; and permitted Moderate Traffic FAR Jack M. Greenspan, PE(oec( levels associated with General Commercial land uses as called out in the city's WiIliamA.Law, PE(neL) General Plan. Paul W. Wilkinson, PE John P Keating, PE David S. Shender, PE John A. Boorman, PE Clare M. Look -Jaeger, PE Richard E. Barrette, PE Keil D. Maberry, PE An L62WB Company Founded 1966 Mr. Walkie Ray July 21, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Briefly, we find the following: • Based on its current floor area occupancy of approximately 84%, the site's existing traffic totals 1,228 trips per day (sum of both directions as determined by driveway counts performed by automatic video cameras). • Expanding that count data to 100% center occupancy indicates an existing baseline traffic generation of 1,470 trips per day, with 72 of those occurring in the AM peak hour, and 114 occurring in the PM peak hour. • Proposed Project traffic forecasts represent a reduction from the above existing baseline levels. Even with treating the market as entirely high - turnover (sit-down) restaurant space, future site traffic would be reduced to 886 trips per day, with 68 of those occurring in the AM peak hour, and 75 occurring in the PM peak hour. • Proposed Project traffic forecasts are also less than the daily and peak hour volumes associated with the site's current General Commercial designation using General Plan trip rates and a Moderate Traffic FAR value of 0.30. PROJECT LOCATION The Project site is addressed at 375 Bristol Street in the City of Costa Mesa. It totals roughly 3.2 acres (138,487 SF), and is located generally southwest of John Wayne Orange County Airport, east of Red Hill Avenue and the Ayres Hotel, and west of the 18 -hole executive Newport Beach Golf Course. Figure 1, located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the project and the surrounding street system. Figure 2 is an existing aerial photograph of the Project site. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Existing Site Development and Tenancy The existing site development consists of 37,883 square -feet (SF) of commercial floor area that has had a historical orientation to automotive -related tenancies. During our recent field study, three suites within the existing development, representing 6,230 SF of space, were unoccupied. Access to the site is now provided via two existing driveways along the southeast - bound roadbed of the Bristol Street couplet that flanks SR 73. As such, vehicle N:G500\214351 S -Bristol .Autoples Site, Costa Mesa\Report\3515 Bristol .Autoples Traffic Generation Letter 7-21-1 5.doc Mr. Walkie Ray July 21, 2015 Page 3 of 6 movements entering and exiting the site are now limited to right-turn-in/right-turn- out. Proposed Project Description As currently proposed, the Project calls for complete demolition of the site and the construction of 98,800 SF of self -storage space and a supporting 1,200 SF ground - floor management office within a two-level 100,000 SF building. Further, the plan calls for a food market providing an additional 5,000 SF of floor area on a single level. The market would be oriented to a mix of gourmet food tenancies and include supporting seating for on-site consumption. Access to the site would be very similar to the existing development, and 80 parking spaces would be positioned around a revised internal circulation system. Figure 3 presents the proposed site plan. Figure 4 presents the Level One floor plan, and illustrates the expected layout within the market to include seven individual vendor spaces and a shared seating area to support on-site dining of over-the-counter food sales. PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the 9th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 2012] and the City of Costa Mesa General Plan. In addition, for existing site development and occupancy levels, a weekday traffic count was conducted in May 2015 at the existing driveways to identify the site's actual daily, AM, and PM peak hour trip -making characteristics. The upper portion of Table 1 summarizes the trip generation rates used in documenting the existing full -occupancy trip generating potential of the site, and as a basis of forecasting the future Project -related condition. The lower portion provides a summary of the site's daily, AM and PM peals hour trip generation calculations for the existing as well as redeveloped and General Plan conditions. N:\3500\_143518 - Bristol AutopleX Site, Costa Mesa\Report\3518 Bristol Autoples Traffic Generation Letter') -21- I5.doc Mr. Walkie Ray July 21, 2015 Page 4 of 6 Trip Making of Existing Site Occupancies Existing site occupancies at the time of our traffic generation field study totaled 31,653 SF, or about 84% of the constructed floor area. Those occupancies generated a total of 1,228 daily trips (sum of inbound and outbound movements), with 60 total trips generated during the AM peak hour, and 95 total trips produced during the PM peak hour. These values are summarized in Subsection A of Table 1, and the actual count results are presented in Appendix A. Fully -Occupied Baseline Trip -Making Potential of Existing Center Subsection B of Table I combines the existing actual trip generation of the site (for existing occupancies) with a forecast (using empirically -derived trip rates at the site) for re -occupancy of the vacant 6,230 SF. Using that format, a fully -occupied existing center would produce a baseline "driveway count" of 1,470 daily trips, with 72 trips (48 inbound, 24 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 114 trips (68 inbound, 46 outbound) produced in the PM peal, hour. General Plan Trip -Making Potential The General Plan shows that the site is currently designated for General Commercial, which permits a floor area ratio (FAR) that varies from 0.75 to 0.20, depending on traffic intensity. For a conservative assessment, a FAR of 0.30 (Moderate Traffic FAR) was assumed in this analysis. Application of this FAR to the site area of 138,487 SF results in a permitted Moderate Traffic FAR site development of 41,546 SF (138,487 SF x 0.30 FAR = 41,546 SF). As shown in Subsection C of Table 1, this General Plan site characteristic is forecast to generate 1,687 daily trips, with 72 trips (46 inbound, 26 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 165 trips (77 inbound, 88 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour. Proposed Project Trip -Making Potential Subsection D of Table I shows the trip generation potential for the proposed Project (100,000 SF of self -storage and management office plus and 5,000 SF of gourmet food market). While the proposed market could be interpreted as purely a retail activity, a more conservative approach has been used, where the entire 5,000 SF has been assumed to be high -turnover (sit-down) restaurant based on ITE Land Use Code 932. On that basis, the proposed Project is forecast to generate 886 daily trips, with 68 trips (38 inbound, 30 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 75 trips (42 inbound, 33 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour. N:\3500\314;518 - Bristol Autoplex Site. Costa A4esa\Report\3518 Bristol Autoplex "Traffic Generation Letter "/-31.15.doc Mr. Walkie Ray July 21, 2015 Page 5 of 6 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Fully -Occupied Existing Center Trips Vs Existing Site Occupancies The lower portion of Table 1 compares the existing site occupancies and traffic versus a fully -occupied existing center. Extracting from a direct comparison of Row B to Row A in the upper portion of the table indicates that full occupancy of existing site development would increase site traffic by 242 daily trips, with 12 more AM peak hour trips, and 19 more PM peak hour trips beyond what the site is currently generating at its 84% floor area occupancy level. General Plan Trips Vs Existing Site Occupancies A comparison between the existing site occupancies (Subsection A) versus the site's General Plan trip making potential (Subsection C) indicates that the site's General Plan potential represents 459 added daily trips, with 12 more AM peak hour trips, and 70 more PM peak hour trips beyond what the site is currently generating at its 84% floor area occupancy level . Proposed Project Trips Vs Existing Site Occupancy and Development Compared to actual site traffic at an 84% floor area occupancy level, the proposed Project (at full occupancy, and with the market characterized as a high -turnover restaurant use) is forecast to generate 342 fewer daily trips, 8 more AM peak hour trips, and 20 fewer PM peak hour trips. This results from a direct comparison of the actual traffic for existing site occupancies (Subsection A) versus the proposed Project trip -malting potential (Subsection D). While the proposed AM peals Project traffic (68 trips) shows a slight increase over the actual existing driveway count (60 trips), that increase is concluded to be insignificant, given the methodology used. Additionally, if the existing site floor area vacancies were to be reoccupied, the "full occupancy" existing site baseline traffic would exceed the daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour levels expected to be generated by the redevelopment Project. CONCLUSION Given the results of the Table I trip generation forecast comparisons, we conclude that the proposed Project trips, at full future site occupancy, are expected to be consistent with but typically less than the site's current actual trip generation characteristics, even with a current floor area vacancy of approximately 16%. N.--\3500\'_'14;515 - Bristol .Autoples Site, Costa Mesa\Report\3518 Bristol Autoplex Traffic Generation Letter % ?1-15.doc Mr. Walkie Ray July 21, 2015 Page 6 of 6 When measured against a full -occupancy baseline trip making potential for the existing center, or that of the site's General Plan designation, the proposed Project would result in less traffic on a daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour basis. We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this investigation. Should you have any questions regarding this analysis, please call us at (949) 825-6175. Sincerely, Q�p�ESStpN� Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers h��ti0 W6`k�NslF�� w 4��1 py � No. ilia Exp, 9.3015 Paul W. Wil ns n, P.E. AF Principal �T"� 0 CAS-®���Q Shane S. Green, P.E. Qty®FESS Transportation Engineer IIIE No.7 94 Attachments N:\3590\2143518 -Bristol Autoplex Site, Costa Mesa\Report\3518 Bristol Autoplex Traffic Generation Letter 7-21-15.doc (tNO SCALE SOURCE: GOOGLE KEY •; = PROJECT SITE FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP BRISTOL AUTOPLEX SITE, COSTA MESA LINSCOTT LAW & G REENSPAN engineers SOURCE: WILEY ARCHITECTS LINSCOTT PLAN DATE: 7.15.15 FIGURE 3 GREENSPAN (MNO SCALE PROPOSED SITE PIAN BRISTOL AUTOPLEX SITE, COSTA MESA SOURCE: WILEY ARCHITECTS LINSCOTT PLAN DATE: 7.15.15 FIGURE TR.��j LAW & ( GREENSPAN NO SCALE PROPOSED LEVEL ONE FLOOR PLAN BRISTOL ALITOPLEX SITE, COSTA MESA J I 1 I. .; r _ 1 I .. ,., ,,....:: 4. :..... "J .., J f 7' - . .. .... ::., ... ...... :..: T a> o rs oo ------------ lro v� co d 000 MARKET 767' rump vn�oon exp �`r if UL T. usss _ 0 0 0 N I OFFICE r wooDDaNOPr S EELCANOPY i � I 12 m I i I ! I IL I i.- I I .-! > I _ 1 s T`QRAGE.__ - - _ — — I I I I i I I M I —_-- STORAGE D m I' E m D P ti H SE SE-1111Ii O. D i O I N .._-- 7Tnt• _� o N c SOURCE: WILEY ARCHITECTS LINSCOTT PLAN DATE: 7.15.15 FIGURE TR.��j LAW & ( GREENSPAN NO SCALE PROPOSED LEVEL ONE FLOOR PLAN BRISTOL ALITOPLEX SITE, COSTA MESA TABLE 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION FORECAST' ITE Land Use Code / Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Project Description 2 -Way Generation Rates: ■ Empirical Autoplex Rates (TE Occupied/TSF) 38.80 67% 33% 1.90 60% 40% 3.00 ■ ITE 151: Mini -Warehouse (TE/TSF) 2.50 55% 45% 0.14 50% 50% 0.26 ■ ITE 932: High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 127.15 55% 45% 10.81 60% 40% 9.85 (TE/TSF) ■ Costa Mesa General Plan General Commercial 40.60 1.11 0.63 1.74 1.85 2.12 3.97 (TE/TSF) Generation Forecasts: A. Existing Site ■ Existing Occupied Site Trips 2 (31,653 SF) 1,228 40 20 60 57 38 95 A: Subtotal 1,228 40 20 60 57 38 95 B. Fully -Occupied Existing Floor Area (37,883 SF) ■ Existing Occupied Site Trips s 1,228 40 20 60 57 38 95 (31,653 SF) ■ Existing Vacancy Trips 242 8 4 12 11 8 19 (6,230 SF) B: Subtotal 1,470 48 24 72 68 46 114 C. Permitted General Plan Floor Area (41,546 SF) 4 ■ General Commercial 1,687 46 26 72 77 88 165 C: Subtotal 1,687 46 26 72 77 88 165 D. Proposed Protect.- roject:Self-Storage Self-Storage(100,000 SF) 250 8 6 14 13 13 26 ■ Gourmet Food Market (5,000 SF) 636 30 24 54 29 20 49 D: Subtotal 886 38 30 68 42 33 75 Fully -Occupied Existing Center Vs Existing Site 242 8 4 12 11 8 19 Occupancies (B -A) General Plan Vs Existing Site Occupancies (C—A) 459 6 6 12 20 50 70 Proposed Project Vs Existing Site Occupancies -342 -2 10 8 -15 -5 -20 (D -A) Proposed Project Vs Fully -Occupied Existing Floor -584 -10 6 -4 -26 -13 -39 Area (D -B) Notes. TE/TSF = Trip end per 1,000 square feet I Source: PIp Generation, 9th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, (ITE) [Washington, D.C. (2012)]. 2 Existing counts were conducted on Thursday, May 28, 2015. During the counts three suites consisting of 6,230 SF were vacant for a total occupancy of 31,653 SF. 3 Existing counts were conducted on Thursday, May 28, 2015. During the counts three suites consisting of 6,230 SF were vacant for a total occupancy of 31,653 SE 4 The General Plan shows that the site is currently designated for General Commercial which has an FAR that varies from 0.75 to 0.20. For a conservative assessment an FAR of 0.30 (Moderate Traffic FAR) was assumed. Application of this FAR to the site area of 138,487 SF results in an entitled site development of41,546 SF (138,487 SF x 0.30 FAR= 41,546 SF). N A3500\2143518 - Bristol Autoplex Site, Costa Mesa\Report\3518 Bristol Autoplex Traffic Generation Letter 7-21 -1 5.doc EXISTING DRIVEWAY COUNTS TABLE A PROJECT DRIVEWAYS COUNTS Time In Driveway 1 Out Total In Driveway 2 Out Total Total of All Driveways 7:00 AM 3 0 3 0 3 3 6 7:15 AM 3 1 4 0 0 0 4 7:30 AM 5 1 6 0 5 5 1.1 7:45 AM 7 0 7 1 2 3 10 8:00 AM 3 1 4 0 2 2 6 8:15 AM 11 4 15 0 2 2 17 8:30 AM 7 4 11 1 1 2 13 8:45 AM 18 5 23 0 1 1 24 AM Peak Hour 39 14 53 1 6 7 60 4:00 PM 9 1 10 4 6 10 20 4:15 PM 9 6 1.5 5 2 7 22 4:30 PM 17 8 25 5 4 9 34 4:45 PM 5 9 14 3 2 5 19 5:00 PM 5 3 8 2 9 11 19 5:15 PM 8 3 11 2 3 5 16 5:30 PM 13 6 19 2 5 7 26 5:45 PM 11 6 17 2 7 9 26 PM Peals Hour 40 24 64 17 14 31 95 = AM/PM Peals Hour turning movement counts conducted onT a sday, May 28, 2015. Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME North Dwy of 375 Bristol Street Day: Thursday Date: 5/28/2015 City: Costa Mesa Project It: CA15_1148_001 AM Peak#iour __ 3145 B 15 _ 3145 PM Peak Hour 00's AM Pk Voiume 30.: 47 ._ Volume . ,! 33 47 77 Pk Hr Fattor 0.336 0 653 D.815 PkHr Factor -0.589: 0 839 0,83T 7 .9.Vo(pme' _ ..; 1' 57 73. 4 6Uolume 42. 7 9 Peak HouY :: 8.00 8 00 8 00; A fi Peak Hour 16 15 16. = 16 OD i %- 9 PI Volume 1A 39 53 6:M_ Volume 26 " X10 64 Pk H Fattor .. _ :, .0,700 0376 Pk HYFactor ' ._ �s. -: :: 0 722;;. .0.586 ` . ,0.640 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME South Dwy of 375 Bristol Street Day: Thursday Date: 5/28/2015 City: Costa Mesa Project#: CA15_1148_002 AM Aeak HkUr ' 11.45 it 30 SI -45 _. PM Peak Hour ; 12 45' 12 DO 12 00:; �lM Pk Volume - 36 32 SS PM PkVolume SS 29 78 Pk.Ht Factor __ € _ is 0,692. D 571 O.b30 PkHr EaRor 0 80b:" 0.518 0 722': 7-431olume 16 2 18 s 4 6,'Volume, 38 `° 25 63 9 Peak Hour ;. 7 3,0 7 45 7 30 4 S Peak Hour 17 Do 1b 00 i6 15 9PkUolume _.; 4 bPkVolume Pk Hi Factor _ 0.550 0 500 : s 0.600 PkHrFattor ......: _ : 0 667: o85D 0.727 t a► MikA, ,►�-0.4. .000wo lift' mills sp!l _r ♦MSR --470 •� _ ria - '�a`�j �• •ten I � � �`° /� Tir� i -.,/� — � i ., ., t , .�' x r .,. �, 1 _ .. ,. Q ' .0. t t 441 AV) ATTACHMENT 3 APPLICATION LETTER TO CITY OF COSTA MESA, PLANNING 375 BRISTOL MIXED-USE STORAGE AND FOOD/RETAIL REVISED CONCEPT DESIGN 9 SEPTEMBER 2016 Project Description Application to Rezone and for a Conditional Use Permit to partially demolish an existing 3 building, automotive center at 375 Bristol and develop a new two-story, 744 unit mini storage facility. The Eastern portion of the existing retail center (approximately 12,450 SF) and some of the existing tenants will remain operational in place during and after construction with minor renovations as required to this structure. Location of the Project; Compatibility with Surrounding Uses The site, 375 Bristol, is located at the southern end of Bristol near Campus where the road splits into a frontage road along the 73 Freeway creating only a one-way access to the property. To the West there is a retail shopping center (Mon Amie Bridal) and the Ayres Hotel. The Newport Beach Golf Course is located to the East and the property line abuts an out-of-bounds area of play. The 55' wide concrete Santa Ana -Delhi Channel Watershed borders the southerly portion of the property creating an approximately 70' buffer to the closest residential use across the channel. In addition, a 6' high concrete block wall along this property line acts as an additional protection for residential uses. Operational hours of the storage facility will be limited access to business hours with security access gates and personnel to monitor activity to avoid noise and potential disturbance of residential neighbors. Given the current uses and zoning of surrounding parcels, a mixed-use proposal of retail and mini -warehouse appears to be entirely compatible to the neighborhood. Existing and Proposed General Plan and Zoning Designations Rezone R-15-01 for 3.18 acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District). Planning Application PA -15-30 for Conditional Use Permit for the partial demolition of the existing Bristol Autoplex automotive center and the development of a two-story, 714 unit mini - storage facility with the existing 12,450 SF auto retail Eastern portion of the building to remain with renovation to the exterior fagade. 4 Existing and Proposed Uses Existing uses on site consist of independent automotive repair shops, tire store, smog check, sound systems installations and various other retail tenants offering food (sushi and sandwiches) as well as fitness gyms and studios. Proposed uses will encompass 12,450 of existing retail maintaining the sushi and sandwich operations (4,000 SF combined) and relocating other auto -related tenants to the remaining available area of approximately 8,770 SF. The new mini -storage two-level building will total 89,910 SF plus 1,000 SF for on-site management offices for the storage operations. The total project will equal 103,410 SF when completed. 5 JWA ALUC Review and Approval: Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) A port of the existing building to remain is within the RPZ at the eastern portion of the project. Since this building will not be replaced it will be allowed according to ACLU guidelines. Height Restriction Zone A 7460-1 Determination from the FAA received April 26, 2016, states that "the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation". Architectural Solution: This project has been modified from its original concept of a newly constructed Food Hall to one that maintains in place several food and auto -related retail small businesses that have been long time tenants of the property. The Eastern portion of the existing building will remain and be renovated to include a new contemporary canopy overhang and signage band incorporating individual backlit channel letters and lighting. This canopy extends to the West along the storage offices to unify the two buildings at the front elevation. A 5' seismic separation between the existing and new buildings will allow for differential settling and constructability and be enclosed with solid gates for security. The Self Storage component of the project will provide 714 storage units of varying sizes equaling 98,800 SF with a 1,000 SF management office. This two-story structure has been sited to the rear of the property and by utilizing the existing grades minimizes the massing as the lot slopes down from Bristol toward the Santa Ana Delhi Channel which borders the South side. Both the fapade of the storage building and the retail component will include the same light fir colored wood siding in alternating horizontal and vertical directions, warm, sand colored smooth stucco and which is contrasted with a rib textured fiber cement facade material in warm grey tones. The taller storage building elevation will include integrated signage and mid- point glazing to add interest and articulation and a crisp, contemporary appeal. 7 Access and Circulation: The two main driveway access points as well as the ADA path -of -travel along Bristol will remain in their current locations. The storage building will provide controlled access gates and one- way counterclockwise circulation around the rear of the building during allowed business hours. 8 Traffic Impact: Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers, has conducted a Traffic Generation Assessment using new driveway counts for the site on a 24-hour, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour basis at the two existing driveways along Bristol using video cameras "observing" for a recent weekday. They prepared preliminary trip generation estimates showing that the proposed project generally results in fewer trips than the existing site. This report has been submitted and accepted by the City of Costa Mesa. -2-2-- 9 Landscape Concept: The new landscaping includes a variety of low water grasses and palms that will screen the lower level of the storage building facade from views Southbound along Bristol. Additional plantings at drive entries will include agave and succulents. Vertical planting of Italian Cypresses flank the doors along the North elevation of the storage building and will cover portions of the lower wall adding to the richness of the building face. Bioretention planter boxes with new retaining walls all along the Channel to the south will be planted with mixed species appropriate to water filtration purposes. Similar bioretention planters are planned adjacent to parking along the Bristol frontage. 10 Green Initiatives: The project expects to achieve a net zero energy goal with ultra low energy use with LED lighting and natural ventilation, practices to avoid heat gain such as cool roof, and power generation with roof top solar panels. Sustainable practices in site development include extensive use of BioRetention Planter Boxes for stormwater filtration. Environmentally friendly recycled content materials with low VOC ratings are planned throughout. -23- What follows is a brief summary of the information previously forwarded that quantifies current and projected City revenue associated with the Autoplex property on Bristol. (1) The net fiscal impact of the proposed project is marginally positive. The additional annual increment is estimated to be approximately $17,000 reflecting a decrease in sales tax revenue and a more than offsetting increase in property tax revenue. (2) One minor but measurable factor driving the positive impact of the new project is lower vacancy rates, largely reflecting the transition away from mostly automotive uses. (3) Easily the main driver of the projected positive fiscal impact is the increased property value that triggers an upward reassessment. The benefit redounds to the city and also to the state, county and local public schools. Hope this helps. Please let me know if there are additional questions. h 16 , - 0 A-m"Wn Paul Freeman 1949 • 351 • 9500 shibumistrategies.com BRISTOL AUTOPLEX CONVERSION TAX REVENUE ANALYSIS ALLOCATED NET ALLOCATED TO LOCAL NETINCREASE CURRENT PROJECTED CHANGE TO CITY SCHOOLS TO CITY PROPERTY TAX $ 75,827 $ 107,142 $ 31,315 21.0% $ 6,576 45.0% $ 14,092 ESTIMATED SALES TAX SQUARE SALES TAX SQUARE SALES TAX NET FEET REVENUE FEET REVENUE CHANGE FOOD TENANTS 3,680 $ 86,720 3,680 $ 86,720 $ TIRE STORE 4,350 $ 52,192 2,500 $ 31,315 $ (20,877) AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 12,722 $ 11,360 6,320 $ 5,643 $ (5,717) OTHER SERVICE 17,542 $ - - $ - $ - TOTAL 38,294 $ 150,272 12,500 $ 123,679 $ (26,593) VACANCY FACTOR 5% (1,915) $ (7,514) (625) $ (6,184) $ 1,330 EFFECTIVE 36,379 $ 142,758 11,875 $ 117,495 $ (25,264) 12.5% $ (3,158) NET INCREASE TO CITY $ 17,510 I:\3500 Bristol Autoplex\Fiscal Impact 10.17.2016 (2) —2S— ORDINANCE NO. 16-xx ATTACHMENT 4 FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 16 -XX OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR REZONE R- 15-01 TO REZONE (OR CHANGE) A 3.18 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 375 BRISTOL STREET FROM PDC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL) TO C2 (GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) FOR A SELF -STORAGE FACILITY AND RETAIL BUILDING AT 375 BRISTOL STREET THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, an application was filed by Annette Wiley, representing the property owner, Sanderson J. Ray Development, requesting approval of the following: • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). • Rezone R-15-01: An ordinance to rezone a 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District). • Planning Application PA -15-30: Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the demolition of the existing automotive center (Bristol Autoplex) and the development of a two-story, 774 -unit mini -storage facility and 5,000 square foot food court building. No code deviations are requested. WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2016 with all persons having the opportunity to speak and be heard for and against the proposal. WHEREAS, on October 10, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended the following actions: 1. Approve the Initial Study/Negative Declaration; 2. Give first reading to Ordinance 16-xx for R-15-01 to rezone (or change) a 3.18 - acre site located at 375 Bristol Street from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District); and 3. Approve Planning Application PA -15-30 by adopting a resolution to approve the project, subject to conditions of approval. WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on November 1, 2016. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all environmental documents comprising the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and has found that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration considers all environmental impacts of the proposed project and a reasonable range of alternatives, and the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration is complete, adequate, and fully complies with all requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Costa Mesa Environmental Guidelines. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the IS/MND was originally made available for a 30 -day public review and comment period from May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016. WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project reflects the independent judgment of the City of Costa Mesa. SECTION 1: REZONE. The City of Costa Mesa Official Zoning Map is hereby amended as follows: 1. There is hereby placed and included in the C2 (General Business District) zoning district a 3.18 -acre parcel, identified as County Assessor Parcel Number 119- 200-33 and as shown in attached Exhibit B, situated in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 13-22 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, the Official Zoning Map of the City of Costa Mesa is hereby amended by the change of zone described in subsection #1 above and in respective Exhibit B. A copy of the Official Zoning Map is on file in the office of the Planning Division. Based on the evidence in the record and the findings contained in Exhibit A, THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY GRANTS APPROVAL TO ADOPT R-15-01, which amends the Zoning Map of the City of Costa Mesa (Exhibit B) with respect to the property described above. SECTION 2: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the IS/MND was originally made available for a 30 -day public review and comment period from May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016. The IS/MND for this project reflects the independent judgment of the City of Costa Mesa. SECTION 3: INCONSISTENCIES. Any provision of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and or further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to affect the provisions of this ordinance. ,) -1 — SECTION 4: SEVERABILITY. If any provision or clause of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or clauses or applications of this ordinance which can be implemented without the invalid provision, clause or application; and to this end, the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. SECTION 5: PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after the passage thereof, and prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days from its passage shall be published once in the ORANGE COAST DAILY PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk five (5) days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance, and within fifteen (15) days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published the aforementioned summary and shall post in the office of the City Clerk a certified copy of this Ordinance together with the names and member of the City Council voting for and against the same. ATTEST: STEPHEN M. MENSINGER Mayor, City of Costa Mesa APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF COSTA MESA STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Council Ordinance Number _ as considered at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 2016, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 2016, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this day of , 2016 EXHIBIT A FINDINGS A. Required Finding: The proposed rezone is consistent with the Zoning Code and the General Plan. Facts In Support of Findings: The proposed project meets or exceeds the intent of the City's Zoning Code with regard to the development standards for the C2 zone, including lot size, building setbacks, building height, and onsite parking. The General Plan land use designation for the project area is General Commercial, which is compatible with the proposed zone change to C2 (General Business District). The following describes the proposed project's consistency with specific goals and objectives of the General Plan, Land Use Element. Goal LU -1: Land Use: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a balanced community of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and institutional uses to satisfy the needs of the social and economic segments of the population and to retain the residential character of the City; to meet the competing demands for alternative developments within each land use classification within reasonable land use intensity limits; and, to ensure the long-term viability and productivity of the community's natural and man-made environments. Consistency: The project would provide a self -storage facility under the title and design features of a "mini -warehouse" with a freestanding food court building that is designated for general commercial uses. The project would add to the commercial character of the community and meet the competing demands for alternative development. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan goal. Objective LU -113: Ensure the long-term productivity and viability of the community's economic base. Consistency: The project would develop a profitable self -storage facility and food court building and would provide local employment opportunities. The proposed project would strengthen the City's economic base. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan objective. Goal LU -2: Development: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to establish development policies that will create and maintain an aesthetically pleasing and functional environment and minimize impacts on existing physical and social resources. Consistency: The project would redevelop the property with a self -storage facility and a food court building. The project would enhance the site's visual appearance through the use of landscaping to soften the visual impact of the storage facility. The proposed project would include the use of materials and colors that create visual interest as outlined in City policies related to -34�- aesthetics. The project's design would reflect that of similar project recently constructed in the area. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan goal. • Objective LU -2A: Encourage new development and redevelopment to improve and maintain the quality of the environment. Consistency: The proposed project includes the redevelopment of a site that currently has an automotive mall. Implementation of the proposed project would reduce stormwater runoff by improving on-site hydrology. The building would be designed with energy saving components including solar panels and low-energy lighting. B. The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental procedures. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If any of these conditions are removed, the decision-making body must make a finding that the project will not result in significant environmental impacts, that the conditions are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency, or that specific economic, social or other considerations make the mitigation measures infeasible. —�51_ EXHIBIT B Amendment to the Zoning Map Change the zoning district of the 3.18 -acre development site at 375 Bristol Street from Planned Development Commercial (PDC) to General Business District (C2) -3z- RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA FOR THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS: (1) ADOPT THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, (2) APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION PA -15-30 FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TWO-STORY, 714 -UNIT MINI -STORAGE FACILITY AND 12,500 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING AT 375 BRISTOL STREET. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, an application was filed by Annette Wiley, representing the property owner, Sanderson J. Ray Development, requesting approval of the following: • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). • Rezone R-15-01: An ordinance to rezone a 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District). • Planning Application PA -15-30: Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the demolition of the existing automotive center (Bristol Autoplex) and the development of a two-story, 774 -unit mini -storage facility and 5,000 square foot food court building. No code deviations are requested. WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2016 with all persons having the opportunity to speak and be heard for and against the proposal. WHEREAS, on October 10, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended the following actions: 1. Approve the Initial Study/Negative Declaration; 2. Give first reading to Ordinance 16-xx for R-15-01 to rezone (or change) a 3.18 - acre site located at 375 Bristol Street from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District); and 3. Approve Planning Application PA -15-30 by adopting a resolution to approve the project, subject to conditions of approval. WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on November 1, 2016. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all environmental documents comprising the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and has found that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration considers all environmental impacts of the proposed project and a reasonable range of alternatives, and the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration is complete, adequate, and fully complies with all requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Costa Mesa Environmental Guidelines. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the IS/MND was originally made available for a 30 -day public review and comment period from May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016. WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project reflects the independent judgment of the City of Costa Mesa. BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record and the findings contained in Exhibit A, the conditions of approval contained within Exhibit B, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program contained in Exhibit C, respectively, the City Council hereby: (1) Adopts the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; (2) Approve and give first reading to Rezone R-15-01; and (3) Approve Planning Application PA -15- 30. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Costa Mesa City Council does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon the activity as described in the staff report for Planning Application PA -15-30 and upon the applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions in Exhibit B and Mitigation Measures in Exhibit C, and compliance of all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Any approval granted by this resolution shall be subject to review, modification or revocation if there is a material change that occurs in the operation, or if the applicant fails to comply with any of the conditions of approval and/or mitigation measures. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if any section, division, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this resolution, or the documents in the record in support of this resolution, are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of November, 2016. ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE STEPHEN M. MENSINGER Mayor, City of Costa Mesa APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF COSTA MESA -35- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Council Ordinance Number _ as considered at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 2016, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 2016, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this day of '2016 EXHIBIT A FINDINGS (APPROVAL) A. Required Finding: The proposed rezone is consistent with the Zoning Code and the General Plan. Facts In Support of Findings: The proposed project meets or exceeds the intent of the City's Zoning Code with regard to the development standards for the C2 zone, including lot size, building setbacks, building height, and onsite parking. The General Plan land use designation for the project area is General Commercial, which is compatible with the proposed zone change to C2 (General Business District). B. The proposed project complies with Title 13, Section 13-29(g)(5), Conditional Use Permit, of the Municipal Code due to the following: Finding: The proposed use is substantially compatible with uses in the same general area and would not be materially detrimental to other properties within the area. Facts in Support of Findings: The proposed use, with the recommended conditions of approval, will be compatible with the other uses in the immediate vicinity. Compliance with the conditions of approval will allow this use to operate with minimal impact on surrounding properties and uses. Finding: Granting the use will not be materially detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public or otherwise injurious to property or improvements within the immediate neighborhood. Facts in Support of Findings: The use is consistent with the C2 zoning of the property and, as conditioned, compatible with the properties in the vicinity. Compliance with the applicable Building and Fire Safety Codes will ensure that the use is not materially detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public or otherwise injurious to property or improvements within the immediate neighborhood. Finding: Granting the conditional use permit will not allow a use, density or intensity which is not in accordance with the general plan designation for the property. Facts in Support of Findings: The property has a General Plan Designation of General Commercial. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the applicable provisions of the General Plan Designation. The request, as conditioned, is consistent with the following goals and objectives of the General Plan. • The project exhibits excellence in design, site planning, integration of uses and structures, and protect the integrity of neighboring development. The project will provide an infill development that will be complementary to an urban setting. The proposed architecture and site design will enhance the street view and will be compatible with existing development in the area. The overall architectural design promotes excellence and compatibility. The variety of building elevations, 39 materials and staggered massing diminishes the boxy design appearance. A condition of approval requires that enhancements to the rear and side elevations shall include enhanced detailing including articulation, projections and use of varied building materials, and shall not be modified unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Director as consistent with the architectural design and features of the proposed development. • The proposal does not require any deviations from the code requirements for the C2 zone. The project meets or exceeds the minimum development standards required by Code with regard to parking, building height, and setbacks. Additional conditions of approval ensure compatibility with the existing community over the long-term. • New landscaping along Bristol Street will beautify the streetscape. The attached landscape plan, which is preliminary at this point, includes new water -efficient landscaping on the subject site. Staff has included, as a condition of approval, that landscaping be subject to final approval by the Planning Division. • The project will generate less traffic in the form of daily trips than the existing development. Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) estimated project trip generation as part of the project -specific Trip Generation Assessment. The proposed project would generate 886 daily trips, with 68 trips produced in the AM peak hour and 75 trips produced in the PM peak hour. The existing land use currently generates 1,228 trips per day (sum of both directions), with 60 trips generated during the AM peak hour and 95 trips generated during the PM peak hour. When the proposed project is compared to the existing "occupied floor area," the project is forecast to result in 342 fewer daily trips, 8 additional AM peak hour trips, and 20 fewer PM peak hour trips. • The prosect is consistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. The Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) is the comprehensive land use plan adopted and administered by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County, as required by Section 21675 of the California Public Utilities Code. The proposed project is located less than a quarter -mile southwest of JWA, and thus is within the Airport Planning Area of JWA according to the ALUC. Land uses within the planning area boundaries of the AELUP must conform to the noise, safety and height restriction standards. The mitigation measures stipulated in Exhibit C will be required to ensure that the interior noise standards for all buildings comply with the standards in the City's Noise Ordinance. The proposed buildings would not exceed 30 feet in height and will be compatible with the AELUP height restrictions. The following describes the proposed project's consistency with specific goals and objectives of the General Plan, Land Use Element. • Goal LU -1: Land Use: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a balanced community of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and institutional uses to satisfy the needs of the social and economic segments of the population and to retain the residential character of the City; to meet the competing demands for alternative developments within -38 each land use classification within reasonable land use intensity limits; and, to ensure the long-term viability and productivity of the community's natural and man-made environments. Consistency: The project would provide a self -storage facility under the title and design features of a "mini -warehouse" with a portion of the existing retail building that is designated for general commercial uses. The project would add to the commercial character of the community and meet the competing demands for alternative development. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan goal. • Objective LU -1B: Ensure the long-term productivity and viability of the community's economic base. Consistency: The project would develop a profitable self -storage facility and food court building and would provide local employment opportunities. The proposed project would strengthen the City's economic base. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan objective. • Goal LU -2: Development: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to establish development policies that will create and maintain an aesthetically pleasing and functional environment and minimize impacts on existing physical and social resources. Consistency: The project would redevelop the property with a self -storage facility and a portion of the existing retail building. The project would enhance the site's visual appearance through the use of landscaping to soften the visual impact of the storage facility. The proposed project would include the use of materials and colors that create visual interest as outlined in City policies related to aesthetics. The project's design would reflect that of similar project recently constructed in the area. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan goal. • Objective LU -2A: Encourage new development and redevelopment to improve and maintain the quality of the environment. Consistency: The proposed project includes the redevelopment of a site that currently has an automotive mall. Implementation of the proposed project would reduce stormwater runoff by improving on-site hydrology. The building would be designed with energy saving components including solar panels and low-energy lighting. C. The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental procedures. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If any of these conditions are removed, the decision-making body must make a finding that the project will not result in significant environmental impacts, that the conditions are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency, or that specific economic, social or other considerations make the mitigation measures infeasible. _3q_ D. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with Chapter XII, Article 3, Transportation System Management, of Title 13 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code in that the development project's traffic impacts will be mitigated at all affected intersections and by the payment of traffic impact fees. EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Ping. 1. The use shall be limited to the type of operation described in this staff report. Any change in the operational characteristics shall require review by the Planning Division and may require an amendment to the master plan, subject to either Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission approval, depending on the nature of the proposed change. The applicant is reminded that Code allows the Planning Commission to modify or revoke any planning application based on findings related to public nuisance and/or noncompliance with conditions of approval [Title 13, Section 13-29(0)]. 2. The mitigation measures of the negative declaration have been included as Exhibit C. If any of these mitigation measures are removed, the decision-making body must make a finding that the project will still not result in significant environmental impacts and that the mitigated negative declaration is still valid. 3. The project shall comply with the .75 maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) as required by Code. 4. The hours of operation for the leasing office shall be Monday through Saturday, 8:00 am to 6:00 pm, and Sunday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Customers of the self -storage facility shall have access to the storage units via a key pad entry gates system between the hours of 7:00 am to 8:00 pm, seven days a week. The leasing office manager shall not reside overnight at the facility. 5. Instead of a live-in manager, the applicant shall provide security cameras and alarms, inside and outside, with monitors in the manager's office and an internet-based feed to the owner's offices and cell phones for 24/7 surveillance. 6. The conditions of approval, code requirements, and special district requirements of PA -15-30 shall be blueprinted on the face of the site plan as part of the plan check submittal package. 7. A decorative wrought iron fence shall be built to replace the chain link fence abutting the golf course to the east, prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy, unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Director. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, a final landscape plan indicating the landscape palette and the design/material of paved areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with the approved plans prior to final inspection or occupancy clearance. 10. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall contact the U.S. Postal Service with regard to location and design of mail delivery facilities. Such facilities shall be shown on the site plan, landscape plan, and/or floor plan. 11. If the project is constructed in phases, the perimeter wall, landscaping along the frontages, and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of utilities for the first phase. 12. No modification(s) of the approved building elevations including, but not limited to, change of architectural type, changes that increase the building height, removal of building articulation, or a change of the finish material(s), shall be made during construction without prior Planning Division written approval. Specifically, elevations shall not be modified unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Director as consistent with the architectural design and features of the proposed development. Failure to obtain prior Planning Division approval of the modification could result in the requirement of the applicant to (re)process the modification through a discretionary review process or a variance, or in the requirement to modify the construction to reflect the approved plans. 13. Prior to issuance of grading permits, developer shall submit for review and approval a Construction Management Plan. This plan features methods to minimize disruption to the neighboring residential uses to the fullest extent that is reasonable and practicable. The plan shall include construction parking and vehicle access and specifying staging areas and delivery and hauling truck routes. The plan should mitigate disruption to residents during construction. The truck route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas and major truck traffic during peak hours. The total truck trips to the site shall not exceed 200 trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus 100 truck trips from the site) unless approved by the Development Services Director or Transportation Services Manager. 14. The subject property's ultimate finished grade level may not be filled/raised in excess of 36 inches above the finished grade of any abutting property. If additional fill dirt is needed to provide acceptable on-site storm water flow to a public street, an alternative means of accommodating that drainage shall be approved by the City's Building Official prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. Such alternatives may include subsurface tie-in to public storm water facilities, subsurface drainage collection systems and/or sumps with mechanical pump discharge in -lieu of gravity flow. If mechanical pump method is determined appropriate, said mechanical pump(s) shall continuously be maintained in working order. In any case, development of subject property shall preserve or improve the existing pattern of drainage on abutting properties. 15. The applicant shall contact the Planning Division to arrange a Planning inspection of the site prior to the release of occupancy/utilities. This inspection is to confirm that the conditions of approval and code requirements have been satisfied. 16. The project includes 360 rooftop -mounted photovoltaic modules with anti - reflective coating. Final review and approval by the FAA shall be required to ensure no glare or interference with aviation operations occur. The FAA's 7460 Determination and the glare analysis shall be required prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Trash facilities shall be screened from view, and designed and located appropriately to minimize potential noise and odor impacts. --q2 18. Transformers, backflow preventers, and any other approved above- ground utility improvement shall be located outside of the required street setback area and shall be screened from view, under direction of Planning staff. Any deviation from this requirement shall be subject to review and approval of the Development Services Director. 19. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the Applicant shall submit a Lighting Plan and Photometric Study for the approval of the City's Development Services Department. The Lighting Plan shall demonstrate compliance with the following: a. The mounting height of lights on light standards shall not exceed 18 feet in any location on the Project site unless approved by the Development Services Director. b. The intensity and location of lights on buildings shall be subject to the Development Services Director's approval. c. All site lighting fixtures shall be provided with a flat glass lens. Photometric calculations shall indicate the effect of the flat glass lens fixture efficiency. d. Lighting design and layout shall limit spill light to no more than 0.5 foot candle at the property line of the surrounding neighbors, consistent with the level of lighting that is deemed necessary for safety and security purposes on site. e. Glare shields may be required for select light standards. 20. All construction contractors shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulations, including Rule 403, Fugitive Dust. All grading (regardless of acreage) shall apply best available control measures for fugitive dust in accordance with Rule 403. To ensure that the project is in full compliance with applicable SCAQMD dust regulations and that there is no nuisance impact off the site, the contractor would implement each of the following: a. Moisten soil not more than 15 minutes prior to moving soil or conduct whatever watering is necessary to prevent visible dust emissions from exceeding 100 feet in any direction. b. Apply chemical stabilizers to disturbed surface areas (completed grading areas) within five days of completing grading or apply dust suppressants or vegetation sufficient to maintain a stabilized surface. c. Water excavated soil piles hourly or covered with temporary coverings. d. Water exposed surfaces at least twice a day under calm conditions. Water as often as needed on windy days when winds are less than 25 miles per day or during very dry weather in order to maintain a surface crust and prevent the release of visible emissions from the construction site. e. Wash mud -covered tired and under -carriages of trucks leaving construction sites. —43— f. Provide for street sweeping, as needed, on adjacent roadways to remove dirt dropped by construction vehicles or mud, which would otherwise be carried off by trucks departing project sites. g. Securely cover loads with a tight fitting tarp on any truck leaving the construction sites to dispose of debris. h. Cease grading during period when winds exceed 25 miles per hour. 21. All rubber tired dozers and graders used during the grading phase of construction shall be powered by Tier 3 engines. 22. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. 23. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, agents, officers and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding (collectively referred to as "proceeding") brought against the City, its elected and appointed officials, agents, officers or employees arising out of, or which are in any way related to, the applicant's project, or any approvals granted by City related to the applicant's project. The indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorney's fees, and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by the applicant, the City and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. This indemnity provision shall include the applicant's obligation to indemnify the City for all the City's costs, fees, and damages that the City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this section. City shall have the right to choose its own legal counsel to represent the City's interests, and applicant shall indemnify City for all such costs incurred by City. 24. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy (C of O) the applicant shall provide a scaled and dimensioned digital site plan(s) for the project site, on either a CD or thumb drive, to the Planning Division. All site plans shall include an accurate and precise drawing of all building footprints and property line locations for the entire project site. All buildings shall be annotated with its corresponding address and suites if applicable. Eng. 25. Maintain the public right-of-way in a "wet -down" condition to prevent excessive dust and promptly remove any spillage from the public right-of- way by sweeping or sprinkling. CODE REQUIREMENTS The following list of federal, state and local laws applicable to the project has been compiled by staff for the applicant's reference. Any reference to "City" pertains to the City of Costa Mesa. Ping. 1. All contractors and subcontractors must have valid business licenses to do business in the City of Costa Mesa. Final inspections, final occupancy and utility releases will not be granted until all such licenses have been obtained. 2. Address assignment shall be requested from the Planning Division prior to submittal of working drawings for plan check. The approved address of individual units, suites, buildings, etc., shall be blueprinted on the site plan and on all floor plans in the working drawings. 3. All applicable provisions of CMMC Section 13-171 (Development Standards for Mini -Warehouses) shall be complied with. 4. Grading materials delivery, equipment operation, and other construction -related activity shall be limited to be-tween the hours of 7 a.m. and 8 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturday. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. Exceptions may be made for activities that will not generate noise audible from off- site, such as painting and other quiet interior work. 5. Two (2) sets of detailed landscape and irrigation plans, which meet the requirements set forth in Costa Mesa Municipal Code Sections 13-101 through 13-108 and the City's Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines, shall be required as part of the project plan check review and approval process. Plans shall be forwarded to the Planning Division for final approval prior to issuance of building permits. 6. Two (2) sets of landscape and irrigation plans, approved by the Planning Division, shall be attached to two of the final building plan sets. 7. All on-site utility services shall be installed underground. 8. Installation of all utility meters shall be performed in a manner so as to obscure the installation from view from any place on or off the property. The installation shall be in a manner acceptable to the public utility and shall be in the form of a vault, wall cabinet, or wall box under the direction of the Planning Division. 9. Any mechanical equipment such as air-conditioning equipment and duct work shall be screened from view in a manner approved by the Planning Division. Bldg. 10. Comply with the requirements of the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Plumbing Code, 2013 California Green Building Standards Code and 2013 California Energy Code (or the applicable adopted, California Building Code, California Residential Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Green Building Standards, and California Energy Code at the time of plan submittal or permit _A5_ issuance) and California Code of Regulations also known as the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the City of Costa Mesa. Requirements for accessibility to sites, facilities, buildings, and elements by individuals with disability shall comply with Chapter 11 B of the 2013 California Building Code. 11. The applicant shall provide the following: a. Accessibility shall be to and through the front door and to the commercial space from the public sidewalk. b. Accessible restrooms/bathrooms shall be provided in the commercial space. c. Accessible parking shall be provided. d. Accessible entry door, ramps, landings, sidewalks, hallways, strike edge clearances, and elevation changes shall be provided. e. Additional access requirements may be required per 2013 California Building Code. 12. Provide a plan to the County of Orange Health Dept. for review and approval. 13. Submit a precise grading plan, an erosion control plan and a hydrology study. If it is determined that a grading plan is not required, a drainage plan shall be provided. 14. Submit a soils report for this project. Soils report recommendations shall be blueprinted on both the architectural and grading plans. 15. The ground adjacent immediately to the foundation shall be slopes away from the building at a slope of not less than 5% for a minimum distance of 10 feet measured perpendicular to the face of the wall CBC sec. 1804.3. See also exception. 16. On graded sites the top of exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved discharge devise a minimum of 12 inches plus 2 percent 2013 California Building Code Section 1808.7.4. Trans. 17. Construct all proposed driveway approaches to comply with city standards. 18. Fulfill mitigation of off-site traffic impacts at the time of issuance of occupancy by submitting to the Transportation Services Division the required traffic impact fee pursuant to the prevailing schedule of charges adopted by the City Council. NOTE: The Traffic Impact Fee will be recalculated at the time of issuance of building permit/certificate of occupancy based upon any changes in the prevailing schedule of charges adopted by the City Council and in effect at that time. 19. Fulfill San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Ordinance requirement at the time of issuance of building permit/certificate of occupancy by submitting the required fee to the Planning Division. NOTE: This fee is subject to revision and possible increase effective July 1 of each year. 20. Close unused drive approaches, or portion of, with full height curb and gutter that comply with City Standards. Fire 21. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the City of Costa Mesa Fire Department shall review and approve the project design features to assess compliance with the California Building Code and California Fire Code. WQMP 22. In order to comply with the 2003 DAMP, the proposed project shall prepare a Storm Drain Plan, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) conforming to the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer or Environmental Engineer, which shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 23. The project shall comply with the NPDES requirements, as follows: a. Construction General Permit Notice of Intent (NOI) Design: Prior to the issuance of preliminary or precise grading permits, the project Applicant shall provide the City Engineer with evidence that an NOI has been filed with the Storm Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Such evidence shall consist of a copy of the NOI stamped by the SWRCB or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or a letter from either agency stating that the NOI has been filed. b. Construction Phase Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP): Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall prepare a SWPPP that complies with the Construction General Permit and will include at a minimum the following: • Discuss in detail the BMPs planned for the project related to control of sediment and erosion, non -sediment pollutants, and potential pollutants in non -storm water discharges; • Describe post -construction BMPs for the project; • Explain the maintenance program for the project's BMPs. c. List the parties responsible for the SWPPP implementation and the BMP maintenance during and after grading. The project Applicant shall implement the SWPPP and modify the SWPPP as directed by the Construction General Permit. 24. A WQMP shall be maintained and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program. The plan shall ensure that the existing water quality measures for all improved phases of the project are adhered to. 25. Location of the BMPs shall not be within the public right-of-way. 26. During demolition, grading, and excavation, workers shall comply with the requirements of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 1529, which provides for exposure limits, exposure monitoring, respiratory protection, and good working practices by workers exposed to asbestos. Asbestos -contaminated debris and other wastes shall be managed and -14- I— disposed of in accordance with the applicable provision of the California Health and Safety Code. 27. During demolition, grading, and excavation, workers shall comply with the requirements of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 1532.1, which provides for exposure limits, exposure monitoring, respiratory protection, and good working practice by workers exposed to lead. Lead -contaminated debris and other wastes shall be managed and disposed of in accordance with the applicable provision of the California Health and Safety Code. 28. Prior to demolition activities, removal and/or abatement of asbestos containing building materials, lead based paints, and hazardous materials associated with the existing building materials, an investigation shall be conducted by a qualified environmental professional in consultation with the Costa Mesa Fire Department. An asbestos and hazardous materials abatement plan shall be developed by the qualified environmental professional, in order to clearly define the scope and objective of the abatement activities. The Applicant shall conduct demolition consistent with the abatement plan, applicable state requirements and City standard conditions. Eng. 29. At the time of development submit for approval an Offsite Plan to the Engineering Division and Grading Plan to the Building Division that shows Sewer, Water, Existing Parkway Improvements and the limits of work on the site, and hydrology calculations, both prepared by a registered Civil Engineer or Architect. Cross lot drainage shall not occur. Construction Access approval must be obtained prior to Building or Engineering Permits being issued by the City of Costa Mesa. Pay Offsite Plan Check fee per Section 13-231 of the C.C.M.M.C. and an approved Offsite Plan shall be required prior to Engineering Permits being issued by the City of Costa Mesa. 30. A Construction Access Permit and deposit of $730 will be required by City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division prior to start of any on-site work, necessary during construction for street sweeping and to guarantee replacement costs in case of damage to existing public improvements. 31. Obtain a permit from the City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division, at the time of development and then construct P.C.C. commercial sidewalk per City of Costa Mesa Standards as shown on the Offsite Plan, including four (4) feet clear around obstructions in the sidewalk. 32. Obtain a permit from the City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division, at the time of development and then construct P.C.C. driveway approaches per City of Costa Mesa Standards as shown on the Offsite Plan. Location and dimensions are subject to the approval of the Transportation Services Manager. ADA compliance required for all new driveway approaches. 33. Obtain a permit from the City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division, at the time of development and then remove any existing driveways and/or curb depressions that will not be used and replace with full height curb and sidewalk. 34. Fulfill City of Costa Mesa Drainage Ordinance No. 06-19 requirements prior to approval of Final Map. 35. Submit for review a hydrology report and calculations prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. 36. Applicant is informed Bristol Street is under a "NO OPEN CUT" moratorium. Open cutting the street pavement during the moratorium period shall require special resurfacing requirements. SPECIAL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS The requirements of the following special districts are hereby forwarded to the applicant: Sani. 1. Applicant will be required to construct sewers to serve this project, at his own expense, meeting the approval of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. 2. County Sanitation District fees, fixture fees, inspection fees, and sewer permit are required prior to installation of sewer. 3. Applicant shall submit a plan showing sewer improvements that meets the District Engineer's approval to the Building Division as part of the plans submitted for plan check. 4. The applicant is required to contact the Costa Mesa Sanitary District at (949) 654-8400 to arrange final sign -off prior to certificate of occupancy being released. 5. Applicant shall contact Costa Mesa Sanitary District at (949) 654-8400 for any additional district requirements. AQMD 6. Applicant shall contact the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) at (800) 288-7664 for potential additional conditions of development or for additional permits required by AQMD. Water 7. Customer shall contact the Mesa Water District — Engineering Desk and submit an application and plans for project review. Customer must obtain a letter of approval and a letter of project completion from Mesa Water District. State 8. Comply with the requirements of the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to determine if red imported fire ants (RIFA) exist on the property prior to any soil movement or excavation. Call CDFA at (714) 708-1910 for information. ^,4q - RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DENYING REZONE R-15-01 FOR A REZONE OF THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.18 -ACRE DEVELOPMENT SITE FROM PDC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL) TO C2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL, AND PLANNING APPLICATION PA -15-30 FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TWO-STORY, 714 -UNIT MINI -STORAGE FACILITY AND 12,500 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING AT 375 BRISTOL STREET. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, an application was filed by Annette Wiley, representing the property owner, Sanderson J. Ray Development, requesting approval of the following: • Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). • Rezone R-15-01: An ordinance to rezone a 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District). • Planning Application PA -15-30: Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the demolition of the existing automotive center (Bristol Autoplex) and the development of a two-story, 774 -unit mini -storage facility and 5,000 square foot food court building. No code deviations are requested. WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2016 with all persons having the opportunity to speak and be heard for and against the proposal. WHEREAS, on October 10, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended the following actions: 1. Approve the Initial Study/Negative Declaration; 2. Give first reading to Ordinance 16-xx for R-15-01 to rezone (or change) a 3.18 - acre site located at 375 Bristol Street from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District); and 3. Approve Planning Application PA -15-30 by adopting a resolution to approve the project, subject to conditions of approval. WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on November 1, 2016. _50- BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record and the findings contained in Exhibit A, the City Council hereby DENIES Rezone R-15-01 and Planning Application PA -15-30. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of November, 2016. ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA STEPHEN M. MENSINGER Mayor, City of Costa Mesa APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY -51- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Council Ordinance Number _ as considered at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 2016, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 2016, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this day of 12016 -52- EXHIBIT A FINDINGS (DENIAL) A. The proposed rezone is not consistent with the Zoning Code and the General Plan. B. The information presented does not comply with Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-29(g)(2) in that: Finding: The proposed use is not compatible with developments in the same general area and would be materially detrimental to other properties within the area. Finding: Granting the conditional use permit will be materially detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the public or otherwise injurious to property or improvements within the immediate neighborhood. Finding: Granting the conditional use permit will allow a use, density, or intensity which is not in accordance with the General plan designation. C. The Costa Mesa City Council has denied Rezone R-15-01 and Planning Application PA -15-30. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b) (5) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a) CEQA does not apply to this project because it has been rejected and will not be carried out. D. The project is exempt from Chapter IX, Article 11, Transportation System Management, of Title 13 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code. _.._ �S3— ATTACHMENTS LEE, MEL From: Terry Jurado <TJurado@dsrg.com> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 5:13 PM To: LEE, MEL Subject: Sandwich World - June 13, 2016 hearing Good afternoon, Mr. Lee: I love Sandwich World! I go there for their delicious sandwiches and salads 2-3 times a week! I've been a steady customer for at least 10 years. It's less than 10 minutes from my Costa Mesa workplace. We hear that the owner of the building does not want to renew their lease and wants to find a different use for the Sandwich World space. This would be a real shame. Sandwich World is very unique: it is a family-owned business where the owners and employees are always so friendly, thoughtful, and outgoing. They have great service — Olivia and Sal are the best! The food is always delicious (especially the rolls), and it's a fun atmosphere. There is always a daily special sandwich for a good price and they also have a rewards card. After you've filled your card, you get a free sandwich, chips, and a drink. It's a great deal! All of us who frequent Sandwich World would be so very sad to see them go. We don't want anyone to lose theirjobs or livelihood. Thank you for your time. Terry Jurado Costa Mesa, CA 5� - LEE, MEL From: Jacqueline Check CSM <JCheck@dsrg.com> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 6:58 PM To: LEE, MEL Subject: Sandwich World - Bristol Street, Costa Mesa Dear Mr. Lee, I understand that the owner of Sandwich World may lose its lease as the property owner is looking to change the use. If this were to occur, I believe this would be a tremendous loss for Costa Mesa and the surrounding trade area. As a huge fan of Sandwich World, I would like to show my support of this business. Since the restaurant opened in 1992, it has built a strong and loyal clientele through its outstanding customer service and its reputation for high-quality food at reasonable prices. It is a very unique sandwich shop and cannot be duplicated by any of the chains like Subway or Jersey Mike's. One actually receives personalized attention, where the owners and their staff take the time to get to know their customers. The owners of Sandwich World feel more like friends or family members rather than anonymous clerks behind a counter. I am hopeful that the City of Costa Mesa sees the value in protecting this business and preserving its rightful place in the community, and I urge you to vote "no" to a change in use. Thank you for your time and consideration. Jacqueline Check 714-321-6730 5S-- LEE, MEL From: Mark McGilvray <MarkM@usstorage.net> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 4:26 PM To: LEE, MEL Subject: 375 Bristol St.proposed conversion to self storage Dear sirs: As a long time patron of Sandwich World and this retail complex, I want to express my opposition to the conversion of this retail center to self storage. This complex currently provides essential and convenient services to the local community—much more so than a storage facility. Please relay my concerns to the Planning commission. Mark Nlcgilvray Westport Properties, Inc. 2201 Dupont Drive, Suite 700 1 Irvine, CA 92612 P 949-748-5913 1 C 949- 279-2071 market &usstoraae.net I www.usstoragecenters.com CA DISE Corporate ID iti� 01106172 LEE, MEL From: Trevor Scott <TScott@rsi-ins.com> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 2:54 PM To: LEE, MEL Subject: 375 Bristol St. Hi Melvin, I'm disappointed to hear Sandwich World and the block of store front businesses along Bristol St could be replaced by storage containers. I work in Costa Mesa. I eat lunch at Sandwich World weekly and I think small family owned businesses are an important part of the culture in Costa Mesa. Replacing them with storage containers does not serve the community properly. I'm out of town and unable to attend the June 13`h meeting but I did want this opportunity to voice my strong opposition to closing Sandwich World and the nearby shops. I hope considering the public opinion is part of the decision process. I'm available for further discussion. Thank you, Trevor Scott 714-721-4955 - 5"i 1 LEE, MEL From: Claudio Haug <Claudio@cahaugcpa.com> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 2:28 PM To: LEE, MEL Subject: Sandwich World Dear Mr Lee: I have been a loyal customer of sandwich world for over 20 years. I understand that consideration is being given to converting the center to a storage facility and thus terminating the lease of the existing tenants. As a CPA, I appreciate the economic necessity for the highest and best use of a property. However, if you could give consideration to the tenants plight as well it would be appreciated. Claudio A. Haug Claudio A. Haug, CPA a Professional Corporation 4910 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660-2119 949 752 2190 949 752 2177 fax - 59-- LEE, MEL From: LYSANNE SEBASTIAN <lysannes@me.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 9:54 PM To: LEE, MEL Subject: Supporting development of SJRD project at the Autoplex To Whom It May Concern: My name is Lysanne Sebastian and I live on the Eastside Costa Mesa at 2666 Club Mesa Place, Costa Mesa. As a resident of Eastside Costa Mesa, I support the project proposed by the Sanderson J. Ray Development to completely revive the autoplex property on Bristol. When Bristol Street, Costa Mesa has become an incredible entry way to South Coast Plaza with the Lab and the Camp, the plan to make improvements would bring in more money to Costa Mesa business and attract more people. Thank you for your consideration, Lysanne Sebastian _._ 5Q �" LEE, MEL From: Shirley Lee <shirley.lee02@grnail.corn> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 8:07 PM To: LEE, MEL Subject: Save 375 Bristol To Whom It May Concern: It was just brought to my attention that Sushi Imari, 375 Bristol, is being asked to relocate as the plaza is being converted to a self -storage facility. This restaurant has been a favorite dining for my family; therefore, I am sending this email for the city to reconsider the plan. Sincerely, Shirley Lee �b I— COLGAN, JULIE From: taehee kim <taehee0327@gmai1.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 11:07 PM To: LEE, MEL; PLANNING COMMISSION; CITY COUNCIL Subject: I do not want to have sushi Imari forehead disappear. I too loved the sushi Imari. Have a good time together in my life. My family, there are memories of a friend. I do not want to have sushi Imari forehead disappear. The storage place in 375 bristol do not want you coming. Because it is just next to the storage. And also I do not want the sushi Imari forehead disappear. COLGAN, JULIE From: George Bean <georgebean@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 3:17 PM To: COLGAN, JULIE; LEE, MEL; PLANNING COMMISSION; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Re: 375 Bristol Street staff report Attachments: Opposition.pdf Dear Mr. Lee and members of the Planning Commission: Please find attached the Opposition of the Merchants of 375 Bristol to the planned re- zone of that property. Thank you, George Bean On Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:15 AM, "COLGAN, JULIE" <JULIE. COLGAN @costamesaca.gov> wrote: Please see the link below for 375 Bristol Street staff report. http://www.costamesaca.govlftp/planningcommission/agenda/2016/2016-06-13/PH-5.pdf Thank you, Julie Colgan Administrative Secretary City of Costa Mesa Development Services Department 714-754-5612 1 julie. colganCaDcostamesaca.gov HAVE A BLESSED 2016!!! In re: J. Ray Sanderson/Cardinal Development — Bristol Center, a California general partnership Application to rezone OPPOSITION OF MERCHANTS TO PROPOSED RE -ZONING AND DESTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS AT 375 BRISTOL, COSTA MESA Hearing: Date: Monday, June 13, 2016 Time: 6:00 p.m. Place: 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA OPPOSITION TO RE -ZONE OF 375 BRISTOL Merchants of 375 Bristol Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Contact: George H. Bean (714) 904-9338 CITY OF COSTA MESA PLANNING COMMISSION In re: OPPOSITION OF MERCHANTS TO PROPOSED RE -ZONING AND J. Ray Sanderson/Cardinal Development – DESTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS AT Bristol Center, a California general partnership 375 BRISTOL, COSTA MESA Application to rezone I Hearin: Date: Monday, June 13, 2016 Time: 6:00 p.m. Place: 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA TO THE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF COSTA MESA: The merchants of 375 Bristol ("Merchants") submit this opposition to the Application of J. Ray Sanderson/Cardinal Development ("Owners") to replace the AutoPlex Mall located at 375 Bristol in Costa Mesa (the "Center") with a self -storage facility. I. INTRODUCTION The Owners claim that the Center is aging and unsustainable in its current form. The exact opposite is true. The Merchants work exhaustively to create a thriving marketplace, which generates jobs for over 60 employees, generates significant tax revenue, about $350,000 OPPOSITION TO RE -ZONE OF 375 BRISTOL —0— annually, and supports the livelihoods of numerous small-business merchants. The Owners claim that the need for small, independent auto repair businesses has declined dramatically. Again, this is simply not true. Many of the automotive shops in the Center have been there for decades and have a fiercely loyal clientele. The other usages such as a sandwich shop, a sushi restaurant, cross -fit, and mixed -martial arts, all have loyal followings, too. The Owners claim that "avigation (sic) restrictions and noise conditions effectively eliminate uses currently zoned for this parcel." Not true. The Center currently houses a variety of uses, all of whom are fighting tooth and nail to keep their businesses and livelihoods from being destroyed by this proposed project. The "vacancies" of which the Owners complain are actually a product of their own mishandling of a pad that used to be occupied by Jiffy Lube. They have cemented over the wells that would allow such a use in the future. The Owners, with a little creativity, could coordinate the types of tenants to harmonize the uses. For example, certain types of merchants utilize parking in the mornings (coffee houses), some utilize parking in the mid-day (sandwich shops) and some utilize parking in the evenings (cross -fit, sushi). It would not take much effort on the Owner's part to keep the tenancy at high levels with an appropriate mix of uses. II. PROPOSED NEW USE The Owners propose to erect a self -storage facility on the site. Costa Mesa already has twenty (20) self -storage facilities. One more will not serve the citizens of Costa Mesa well. The General Plan of Costa Mesa provides that its intent is to strive to maintain and improve a socially -cohesive, economically -viable, and physically attractive community. This is not achieved by replacing an existing Center that produces significant tax revenue and serves over one -hundred -fifty -thousand (150,000) customers annually (see the Economic Impact Chart attached to this opposition) with a nameless, faceless storage facility. OPPOSITION TO RE -ZONE OF 375 BRISTOL -- 4S The City of Costa Mesa already has twenty (20) self -storage facilities, serving the population of approximately 110,000. By contrast, Irvine only has twelve (12) self -storage facilities, yet has 350,000 residents. Santa Ana has sixteen (16), serving 250,000 residents and Newport Beach has seven (7) to serve 87,000 residents. There is no reason that Costa Mesa needs two to five times more self -storage than all of their neighboring cities. Further, Costa Mesa is only sixteen (16) square miles, while the neighboring cities range from twenty-seven (27) to sixty-six (66) square miles. The disproportionate number of self -storage facilities does not serve to "retain the residential character of the City." Thus, it is not consistent with the objectives of the General Plan which requires the Commission and the Council to maintain a socially -cohesive and physically attractive community. III. ZONING CHANGE The Owners seek approval to re -zone the property from Planned Development Commercial (PDC) to General Business (C2). This is a downgrade. The definition of PDC is a district intended for retail shops, offices and service establishments, including but not limited to, hotels, restaurants, theaters, museums, financial institutions, and health clubs. The definition of C2 is a district which provides for uses which are generally less compatible with more sensitive land uses of a residential or institutional nature. (Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-20) The Owners want to replace a thriving, community -oriented marketplace with a stolid, indifferent self -storage facility. The purpose of the Zoning Code of Costa Mesa is to "promote the public health, safety, general welfare and preserve and enhance the aesthetic quality of the city by providing regulations to ensure that an appropriate mix of land uses occur in an orderly manner." (See OPPOSITION TO RE -ZONE OF 375 BRISTOL 410— City of Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-2). The City's guardians are charged with achieving a pattern of zoning that: (a) Establishes a balance of land uses to preserve the residential character of the city. (b) Ensures the long term productivity and viability of the community's economic base. (c) Promotes land use patterns and development which contribute to community and neighborhood identity Yet another self -storage building will not preserve the residential character of the city. The project will reduce the productivity and viability of the community's economic base and a self -storage facility does nothing to contribute to community and neighborhood identity. The long-term Merchants have developed relationships with the citizens of Costa Mesa. These long- term relationships contribute to community, both financially and culturally. A self -storage facility does not. IV. REVENUE The Merchants of 375 Bristol contribute significant revenue to the coffers of the City of Costa Mesa. The two largest sources of revenue for the City of Costa Mesa are property taxes and sales tax. The Merchants contribute about $350,000 per year in taxes and inject over $7,000,000 into the local economy. (Please see attached Economic Impact Chart). The same will not be true of a self -storage facility. The Planning Commission's finding that the proposed project would strengthen the City's economic base would be an error. A self -storage facility will produce much less revenue for the City, the County and the State. Therefore, any finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan would be based on a false premise. The Owner's idea of a food court is a pipe dream. The Owners say that this spot is no longer viable as a strip OPPOSITION TO RE -ZONE OF 375 BRISTOL mall that houses restaurants, yet they ask you to believe that a food court inside a storage facility is going to fly. They are insulting your intelligence. V. CONCLUSION This attempt to re -zone and change the use at 375 Bristol is a short-sighted blunder. It will put more than 60 people out of work. It will deprive the citizens of Costa Mesa of a popular and necessary destination for auto repair, fitness and restaurants. It will lower the tax revenue for the City of Costa Mesa and most importantly it will make the City of Costa Mesa a less desirable place to live. The Merchants have developed relationships with their customers. They have become friends who are delighted to see each other. It is an oasis for the hard-working people of Orange County to come and see a friendly face that greets them by name and knows their order. The Planning Commission and the City Council have a responsibility to the citizens of the City of Costa Mesa, to promote regulations that contribute to the community and support a sustainable, appropriate mix of land uses. There is no reason to permit a drastically disproportionate number of self -storage facilities that do not contribute to our community. We ask that the Planning Commission carefully consider whether this project is consistent with the intent of the General Plan. It is certainly not in the best interests of the people of Costa Mesa, nor the Merchants of 375 Bristol, and does not promote a socially -cohesive, economically -viable, and physically attractive community. Respectfully submitted by the Merchants of 375 Bristol, in the City of Costa Mesa OPPOSITION TO RE -ZONE OF 375 BRISTOL — 61� ECONOMIC IMPACT Impact of closure of businesses at 375 Bristol. Location Since Employees Annual Revenue Annual Customers Sales and Used Tax plus Property Tax (Annuallyl Sandwich World 1996 12 27,000 Becker Tire 2010 5 6,000 Sushi Imari 2005 8 37,000 Dan's Auto Care 1996 5 2,821 EuroWest 1995 4 1,200 CrossFit 2014 10 36,000 Newport Smog 2005 3 8,400 Waves Auto Sound 2006 3 576 Saddleback Smog & Repair 1997 5 4,500 Cavilino 1990 3 600 Costa Mesa Training Center 2011 2 11,520 OC Shaolin Kung Fu 2013 2 15,000 Beach City Automotive 2005 2 4,000 TOTALS: 64 $7,143,956 154,617 $348,552 (O q — COLGAN, JULIE From: Brenda Guadarrama <brendaguadarrama36@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 6:45 PM To: PLANNING COMMISSION Subject: Support the merchants of 375 Bristol I am writing this email to you to please put a stop at taking away what the employees have been working for for so long. Taking away their business is the same as taking away their hard work and priority in the community. I humbly ask you to reconsider the fact that there are families that depend on those who work their hardest to have a sustainable living for them. Please do not take away what others have tried to accomplish. Thank you. —7® COLGAN, JULIE From: Aylin Lima <aylin_lima@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 7:24 PM To: PLANNING COMMISSION Subject: Support merchants of 375 Bristol To whom it may concern: I am writing this message to support the mechanics of 375 Bristol street. I want to ask you to consider the demolition of these buildings, as you know many families depend on these business and taking them down would be devastating for the owners and the employees. I hope that you consider this request and that this businesses will remain. Sent from Yahoo Mail for Whone —91— COLGAN, JULIE From: hobart taylor <hobarttl@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:53 PM To: LEE, MEL; PLANNING COMMISSION; citycouncil@costamesa.gov Subject: 375 Bristol complex To whom it may concern, I am writing in support of the merchants located at 375 Bristol. In a world of large and impersonal businesses, the City of Costa Mesa has created and maintained a environment friendly to small independent businesses. This has made Costa Mesa special in the souless suburban realm of Orange County. What makes the complex at 375 Bristol especially valuable is that the businesses are symbiotic. Each of the automotive shops specializes in ways that provide complete service otherwise unavailable without scurrying hither and yon. Tires, smog check, sound services,brake specialists, transmission work,body work, and vintage and foreign car repair are joined together in one location with the highest quality work done by individual entrepreneurs who take special pride in what they do, and do so at reasonable rates. Located most conveniently between Irvine and downtown Costa Mesa and just off the 73, it is hard to imagine any one of these businesses doing as well without both the optimal location and the proximity of their peers. I have been going to the various businesses located in the 375 Bristol Center for the 15 years I have lived in Orange County. Some of the businesses have changed or evolved. What hasn't changed is the reliably superior service and convenience I and so many others have gotten there. I strongly urge you to maintain the integrity of this sensible and beneficial business complex. Hobart Taylor University Hills UCI Irvine, CA. q2- COLGAN, JULIE From: yasmin lima <limayasmin1977@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 6:24 PM To: PLANNING COMMISSION Subject: Rv: support the merchants of 375 bristol Enviado desde Yahoo Mail para Android El lun., jun. 13, PM a 6:21 PM, yasmin lima <limayasmin1977@yahoo.com> escribio: the reason of my message is to support merchants who have business in the 375 bristol street. I want to ask you to reconsider the demolition of these buildings because, these businesses are the livelihood of many families please consider this request and I hope these small businesses remain. Enviado desde Yahoo Mail para Android _93- COLGAN, JULIE Subject: Support the merchants of 375 Bristol -----Original Message ----- From: Brenda Guadarrama(mailto:brendaguadarrama36@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 6:44 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE@costamesaca.gov> Subject: Support the merchants of 375 Bristol I am writing this email to you to please put a stop at taking away what the employees have been working for for so long. Taking away their business is the same as taking away their hard work and priority in the community. I humbly ask you to reconsider the fact that there are families that depend on those who work their hardest to have a sustainable living for them. Please do not take away what others have tried to accomplish. Thank you. I/� COLGAN, JULIE Subject: Support the merchants of 375 Bristol From: Aylin Lima [mailto:aylin lima@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 7:23 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEECa@costamesaca.gov> Subject: Support the merchants of 37S Bristol To whom it may concern: I am writing this message to support the mechanics of 375 Bristol street. I want to ask you to consider the demolition of these buildings, as you know many families depend on these business and taking them down would be devastating for the owners and the employees. I hope that you consider this request and that this businesses will remain. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone COLGAN, JULIE Subject: 375 Bristol From: hobart taylor [mailto:hobartt1Pyahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 10:16 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE costamesaca.gov>; rdickson.cmpc@gmail.com; aventrue@ca.rr.com; sandranian@yahoo.com; colinkmccarthv@vahoo.com; twsesler gmail.com; MENSINGER, STEPHEN <STEPHEN.MENSINGER@costamesaca.gov>; FOLEY, KATRINA <KATRINA. FOLEY costamesaca.gov>; GENIS, SANDRA <SANDRA.GENIS costamesaca.gov>; RIGHEIMER, JIM <JIM.RIGHEIMER costamesaca.gov>; MONAHAN, GARY <GARY.MONAHAN@costamesaca.gov_> Subject: 375 Bristol To whom it may concern, I am writing in support of the merchants located at 375 Bristol. In a world of large and impersonal businesses, the City of Costa Mesa has created and maintained a environment friendly to small independent businesses. This has made Costa Mesa special in the soulless suburban realm of Orange County. What makes the complex at 375 Bristol especially valuable is that the businesses are symbiotic. Each of the automotive shops specializes in ways that provide complete service otherwise unavailable without scurrying hither and yon. Tires, smog check, sound services,brake specialists, transmission work,bodywork, and vintage and foreign car repair are joined together in one location with the highest quality work done by individual entrepreneurs who take special pride in what they do, and do so at reasonable rates. Located most conveniently between Irvine and downtown Costa Mesa and just off the 73, it is hard to imagine any one of these businesses doing as well without both the optimal location and the proximity of their peers. I have been going to the various businesses located in the 375 Bristol Center for the 15 years I have lived in Orange County. Some of the businesses have changed or evolved. What hasn't changed is the reliably superior service and convenience I and so many others have gotten there. I strongly urge you to maintain the integrity of this sensible and beneficial business complex. Hobart Taylor 23 Frost University Hills UCI Irvine, CA. 92617 --1 1- COLGAN, JULIE Subject: Project on Bristol From: Donald Ayres, 111 [mailto:don3@avresgroup.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 11:13 AM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE@costamesaca.gov> Subject: Project on Bristol Hello Mel, I met with Walkie Ray yesterday and he showed me his proposed project on Bristol, next to our Ayres Plaza and Ayres Hotel. From the looks of the elevation design and lay out of the food court and mini -storage behind it, I feel it would be a nice upgrade to this part of Bristol St. and Costa Mesa, in general. I just thought I would pass that note on to you and your team. Respectfully, Donald B. Ayres, III Ayres Hotels 355 Bristol St. Suite A Costa Mesa, CA 92626 0) 714-540-6060 Ext. 141 C) 949-244-5387 We Care About People -We Value Teamwork -We Deliver Results � �F_ COLGAN, JULIE Subject: Re -zoning Application - 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA From: Gena H. Reed [mailto:genahreed@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 12:46 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE@costamesaca.gov> Subject: Re -zoning Application - 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA To the Planning Commission and City Council: As a business owner in Costa Mesa, I want to support the Bristol Storage project. I believe the project represents a substantial benefit to the City due to improvements to landscaping, aesthetics, street frontage and sustainable initiatives. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, enc -rzf. Reed 949.350.5390 _. 9qQ COLGAN, JULIE Subject: Re Autoplex Tenant Concerns From: Paul Freeman <PaulCa)-shibumistrategies.com> Subject: Re Autoplex Tenant Concerns Date: June 9, 2016 at 4:25:55 PM PDT To: Claire Flynn <claire.flynn D-costamesaca.gov> Claire, Hope this finds you well. You've asked what we've done or are doing in liaison with tenants to try and address outstanding tenant concerns. I'm writing this letter, via email, in response. A bit of background — We've been planning this redevelopment for some time, and for at least the last five years lease renewals have had language reflecting the eventually. More recently we sent a letter to tenants in August last year, advising them of our forthcoming application to the city and asking that if anyone had particular concerns, or wanted simply to talk all this through, we wanted to hear from them. We said that we would make the time needed to meet in an effort to address their issues, and a number of tenants did reach out and we met with them. During the last ten or eleven months, there have been such ad hoc discussions; also tenant meetings held independently of Autoplex ownership and management. Earlier this week we sent out our most recent letter to tenants. In that letter we noted the Commission's upcoming public hearing next week. We noted that everyone has a right to speak at such hearings, while stating again that we would be pleased to meet with tenants who wish to meet. It's a shame of course that the redevelopment of the Autoplex would cause existing tenants, most if not all, to relocate. On the other hand, we feel confident that current patrons of the Autoplex restaurants will be more than pleased with the new food hall. By the way, the new food hall will have 35% more space devoted to food compared with the status quo. Unfortunately, the center is not sustainable as it is. Not all tenants today are paying market rents, and this is especially true for non -auto related uses. Plus the industry for auto related uses has changed, with dealers now relying more on parts and service for survival: this does not bode well. Between the avigation easement, airplane noise and limited visibility and access off a one-way street, this site is highly constrained, i.e., this is a truly challenging site. Our project we think makes the best of the situation: by greatly improving aesthetics from public views and providing more and better food options for those who live and work nearby — all with a net reduction in traffic. The proposed project would prove a good-looking, and quiet, use, one we believe that would serve to make a far stronger "gateway" statement at the edge of Costa Mesa. I'm told some tenants recognize the situation for what it is. Some have said they are grateful to have had such a solid head's up, such advance notice. Many are at least somewhat relieved to have learned that the earliest they would have to relocate is October of 2017. Which would mean they'll have had — at a minimum — 28 months' notice to plan their move. Please call if you'd like to discuss any of this at greater length, Claire; to discuss this or any other issue. I hope this helps to answer your question. Thanks very much. Best, p Shi[DL,' & Paul Freeman 1949 • 351 • 9500 shibumistratep-ies.com Privileged And Confidential This electronic transmission and any attachments hereto (a) are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC §§ 2510-2521), (b) may contain confidential or legally privileged information and (c) are for the sole use of the intended recipient named above. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it. Copying, distribution or any use or disclosure of the contents of a message received in error is strictly prohibited. _31- P 'N COLGAN, JULIE Subject: Support for Sandwich World From: Kevin Bikhazi [mailto:kevinPocwebkings.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 1:42 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE costamesaca.go_v> Subject: Support for Sandwich World Hi Mel, I just wanted to put my support in for Sandwich World. I believe there will be a city vote on June 13th on whether or not to shut down Sandwich World and other surrounding businesses to turn the 375 Bristol St. complex into a storage facility. My employees and I regularly visit Sandwich World to get a healthy and well -priced lunch. They really have the best sandwiches in town and we'd be very disappointed to see them shut down. I know that many other people rely on Sandwich World for an excellent lunch including top business executives, law enforcement/other emergency services, and the surrounding residential community. I hope that you can consider our support for Sandwich World in your decision on June 13th. Thank you very much Mel! Kevin Bikhazi OC Web Kings 4590 MacArthur Blvd #500 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (949) 701-6831 Email: kevin@ocwebkin sq com Website: www.ocwebkings.com _3 2-- COLGAN, JULIE From: Lee, Jiyoung <Jiyoung.Lee@PacificLife.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 1:36 PM To: LEE, MEL; PLANNING COMMISSION; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Sushi Imari - 375 Bristol I just want to write this and let you know that I am very sad to hear about the proposed rezone of the above property. This is one of my favorite restaurant and I wish they can keep their business on their current location. X Lee The information in this e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged or confidential information. Delivery to other than the intended recipient shall not be deemed to waive any privilege. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message or attachment is strictly prohibited. If you believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and all of its attachments. COLGAN, JULIE From: Byron Mauss <byronm@amlegalgroup.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 2:59 PM To: LEE, MEL; PLANNING COMMISSION; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Re -Zoning Application - 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, California Dear Planning Commission and City Council: My name is Byron Mauss and I am an owner of a law firm business located in Costa Mesa. I am informed that the Planning Commission will be considering an application for the re -zoning of the commercial property referenced above at your meeting scheduled for June 13, 2016, with the purpose of the re -zoning to allow a self -storage facility. As a business owner in Costa Mesa, the current businesses located in this strip retail center are important to me as a consumer, and I use them frequently. I would prefer that the existing businesses located here remain in place. Thank you for your consideration. Best regards, Byron Mauss ASSAYAG o MAL'SS rA Limited Liability Partnership Byron B. Mauss bvronmCcDamleRaIRroup.com 2915 Redhill Avenue Suite 200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: (714) 427-6800 Fax: (714) 427-6888 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE — This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain information from the law firm of Assayag Mauss that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. P}I 5 COLGAN, JULIE Subject: Bristol Storage Project From: Soojin Lim fmailto:slim lwicdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:34 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE CcDcostamesaca.gov> Subject: Bristol Storage Project Hi Mel, I am writing this email to support Bristol storage project as a business owner and resident of Costa Mesa. I believe the project represents a benefit to the City due to improvements to landscaping, aesthetics, street frontage and sustainable initiatives. I understand some customers of Sushi Imari and sandwich shop are opposed to this project but I believe the new food hall can provide a more lively place for the community. Soojin Lim CID, LEER AP ID+C MC Design tel: 949 - 903 - 5632 fax: 7,14 - 540 - 1949 418 Enclave Cir. #304 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Q%J COLGAN, JULIE From: Robert Yim <boyd0981@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 6:55 AM To: LEE, MEL; PLANNING COMMISSION; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Support the Merchants of 375 Bristol I have been a patron of Imari Sushi, this business establishment, for the past ten years. I drive from LA to Costa Mesa for this place. Otherwise, I have no reason to be in your city. ask you to support the merchants of 375 Bristol. Keep the businesses open. Do NOT allow this building to be turned into a self storage building. Please take a look at the YELP and read all the wonderful comments their customers write about them. They have great service and great food. Sincerely, Robert Yim COLGAN, JULIE From: Tyler M <tmabery@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 12:59 PM To: LEE, MEL; PLANNING COMMISSION; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Merchants of 375 Bristol I would like to ask for you guys to please consider other options to profiting rather than closing family owned businesses to open another self storage facility. Sandwich World is a staple to many businesses around the area and we would be really sad to lose such a great place. I know you guys will do the right thing. There is a self storage facility right down the road, we don't need another one. If you do need more storage then there are other locations. .— 169 -- N- s COLGAN, JULIE Subject: 375 Bristol: Sanderson JRay Development From: Gregory Ashton [mailto:gpashton@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 2:23 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE@costamesaca.gov> Subject: 375 Bristol: Sanderson JRay Development Dear Mel: My name is Greg Ashton and I'm sending this note in support of the Sanderson JRay development proposed for 375 Bristol. As we know, Costa Mesa is one of the most desirable communities in Orange county thanks to its diversity in community, culture and commerce. My wife and I have owned our home on the Eastside for nearly 20 years and can't imagine raising our two children anywhere else. Professionally, I am a licensed California Architect and currently employed as a Principal Concept Architect for Walt Disney Imagineering; I have a BArch from Cal Poly Pomona and an MArch from Harvard University. That being said, I feel well qualified in my personal and professional support of this development. This is an exciting proposal on several levels: first is the design team's skillful use of interesting building and landscape materials. Second, is the scale of the development which scales well proportionally between the surrounding neighborhood and the 73 Freeway. But the trait that has the most potential is the programmatic combination of self -storage and food hall : these two user groups should sympathetically enhance usage and, if ideally, act as a developmental catalyst for other improvements along the south end of Bristol. Sanderson JRay have a track record of seeking interesting ways to distinguish their business developments through design and artistic dimensions. The proposal by the Wiley Architects design team is no exception. As Costa Mesa moves forward, shedding its post-war, suburban image, projects like this will play a key role in fulfilling that transition into a mature city, with a central role in the commerce and character of coastal Orange County. Feel free to contact me if I can express my support further. Sincerely, Greg Ashton gpashtongsbc global. net 949.650.6480 -6g3- N 5 COLGAN, JULIE Subject: Support the Merchants of 375 Bristol From: irenevim64@hotmaii.com fmailto:ireneyim64(@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 2:21 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE @costamesaca.go_v> Subject: RE: Support the Merchants of 375 Bristol To whom it may concern: I have been a patron of Imari Sushi, this business establishment, for the past ten years. I drive from Alhambra to Costa Mesa for this place. Otherwise, I have no reason to be in your city. I ask you to support the merchants of 375 Bristol. Keep the businesses open. Do NOT allow this building to be turned into a self storage building. Please take a look at the YELP and read all the wonderful comments their customers write about them. They have great service and great food. Sincerely, Irene Yim COLGAN, JULIE From: Erick Becker <ebecker@cwlawyers.com> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:03 PM To: LEE, MEL; PLANNING COMMISSION; Mayor Subject: 375 Bristol rezoning I am writing to register my opposition to the proposed rezoning of the commercial center at 375 S.E. Bristol to make way for a self—storage facility. I believe that the best use for the property is a commercial retail center. I frequently patronize businesses in the center, and the various restaurants and services provided are beneficial to those working in the Bristol corridor. Eliminating this center will not benefit the citizens of Costa Mesa, will harm the small businesses in the center, and will eliminate numerous jobs. I sincerely hope the city denies the request to rezone the property. Thank you, Erick Becker Erick J. Becker Cummins & White, LLP 2424 S.E. Bristol Street, Suite 300 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (949) 852-1800 Fax: (949) 852-8510 Email: ebecker(a)cwlawyers.com Bio: Attorney Profile www.cumminsandwhite.com 1ULi .-`. This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately, and delete the e-mail. —qo— COLGAN, JULIE From: theresa lee <sang-theresa@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 2:40 PM To: PLANNING COMMISSION Subject: Sushi Imari, Support the Merchants at 375 Bristol Planning Commission, Sushi Imari is my favorite restaurant and I do not want it to close. Do you remember your favorite restaurant growing up? Well, Sushi Imari is that restaurant for my children. It would not be good for the community to have this strip mall toppled to replace it with a storage facility and a food court. Sushi Imari serves the Costa Mesa community and the surrounding Orange County cities with delicious and affordable sushi. I know of over 100 families that frequently dine and love to eat at Sushi Imari. I personally love the warm hospitality of the owners and staff and the absolutely delicious and fresh sushi served daily. A food court can not "provide Costa Mesa residents with additional high-quality food choices" like Sushi Imari. The good will, delicious food, and the superb service that Sushi Imari has provided the Costa Mesa community for 11.5 years is paramount. You can experience it daily when dining at the restaurant. There is always a line to be seated because so many people love the food and dining experience at Sushi Imari. Please do not close Sushi Imari. Sushi Imari is my favorite restaurant. Theresa Lee Mil COLGAN, JULIE Subject: 375 Bristol Buildings From: Joe P fmailto:ioe dede@hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 6:49 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE@costamesaca.gov> Subject: 375 Bristol Buildings It is my understanding that a proposal to demolish and replace the buildings at 375 Bristol will be heard by the Planning Commission on Monday June 13, 2016. Please express the opinion of many that the loss of the businesses in this location to a self storage facility would be most unfortunate and a great inconvenience. I, along with my coworkers have utilized businesses at this location at least weekly for the better part of 20 years. The loss of this convenience in an area with so many offices and businesses would be regrettable. Please share our opinion with the Planning Commission. Thank you ..... Joe Petitpas -q2- P-4 5- COLGAN, JULIE Subject: Sushi Imari, Support the Merchants of 375 Bristol From: theresa lee [ma ilto:sang-theresa@sbcgloba1.net] Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 2:35 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE costamesaca.gov> Subject: Sushi Imari, Support the Merchants of 375 Bristol Mel Lee, Sushi Imari is my favorite restaurant and I do not want it to close. Do you remember your favorite restaurant growing up? Well, Sushi Imari is that restaurant for my children. It would not be good for the community to have this strip mall toppled to replace it with a storage facility and a food court. Sushi Imari serves the Costa Mesa community and the surrounding Orange County cities with delicious and affordable sushi. I know of over 100 families that frequently dine and love to eat at Sushi Imari. I personally love the warm hospitality of the owners and staff and the absolutely delicious and fresh sushi served daily. A food court can not "provide Costa Mesa residents with additional high-quality food choices" like Sushi Imari. The good will, delicious food, and the superb service that Sushi Imari has provided the Costa Mesa community for 11.5 years is paramount. You can experience it daily when dining at the restaurant. There is always a line to be seated because so many people love the food and dining experience at Sushi Imari. Please do not close Sushi Imari. Sushi ]man is my favorite restaurant. Theresa Lee P}I' s COLGAN, JULIE Subject: [BULK] Importance: Low From: Sarah Yim [mailto:pockadot777@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 6:59 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE@costamesaca.gov_> Subject: [BULK] Importance: Low To whom it may concern: I have been a patron of Imari Sushi, this business establishment, for the past ten years. I drive from Alhambra to Costa Mesa for this place. Otherwise, I have no reason to be in your city. I ask you to support the merchants of 375 Bristol. Keep the businesses open. Do NOT allow this building to be turned into a self storage building. Please take a look at the YELP and read all the wonderful comments their customers write about them. They have great service and great food. Sincerely, Sarah Yim Sushi Imari - 1110 Photos & 974 Reviews - Sushi Bars - 375 Bristol St - Costa Mesa, CA ... Page 1 of 15 Find Near San Francisco, CA Log In Home About Me Write a Review Find Friends Messages Talk Events YelR Sushi Imari 13t)W `O C 974 reviews Details $$•Sushi Bars. Japanese Edit T ,z. �r s Map dna ,�2016 Goode 375 Bristol St p Edit Suite 40 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 ®Get Directions <, (714) 641-5654 U -. "Next up, he tried the sake bomb roll which was good, but a little too spicy for him and I had ANOTHER spicy crunchy roil." in 107 reviews $9.95 39 Sake Bomb Roll "One of my best friends usually orders the 'Marilyn Monroll" which is a cute pink -wrapped salmon ensemble that is equally delicious." in 25 reviews 21R.— $12.95 45 Marilyn Monroll "We've gotten so much freebies, such as free ice cream, miso soup, sashimi, rolls, gyoza, and baked mussels." in 73 reviews r ry - Show more review highlights Recommended Reviews Sort byYelp Sort- English (974) I. " Your trust is our top concern, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more. d. Start your review of Sushi Imari. Joanna K.©©©O 5/23/2016 CA Fui80 q ds friends s BO friends Service: A+ 4 reviews Food: A+ All the servers are so friendly and accomodating, and what makes it even better is the food! Super yummy. Would come down again definitely. http://www.yelp.com/biz/sushi-imari-costa-mesa 6/13/2016 3 # NAME ADDRESS iW PHONE # SIGN 1/\, -Outs L���n fvr auf ✓,yt212d;J,> �r 7t �Lq�.��bY CA �fZ--Z.M IMile c A- . 9.2-6.2b w �' 416 7 << JLC uq � 8 s6x) Z:�& ,31 S( /u 10 A APl ry i pct,erl\j qr Cl T-rv-Y)e. � ' 3�-q\ i41�f SUSHI IMARI J m # NAME ADDRESS or JIM PHONE # SIGN �q -b215\0u a ��QW -Q 2 G��,� R��� ��� c� Pe a4a _ 72 3 (�L- s s J -t , CCA 5 6 7 Toe c,, g r Tr -,n c—c-, fc-,� —(7S -�"�_✓ 10 F`Q/ ta 4Af SUSHI IMARI Gq— # NAME ADDRESS or PHONE # SIGN 91-150-2211 5 iti l53 i 1�rrvv�u ►fir �OZ(p- �1�� -sv(a3 6 ;�,� 'ji 0 c -)i 8(f* or, `� -qq'- v//q C y 8 r t g &y syr 33 10 �, `� ' 11� T77 (34 11 quos, C-'lte sone -q CT'l� PE �� � �,ns ���'��s c�, SUSHI IMARI # NAME ADDRESS or PHONE # SIGN Ckf 2 p tvu 61'54' -Ti/' 3 {�` C wc C� s 4 CIA- �' 1, A_e_ (,A 6 -Ttk-,OtqC 3s'— �0 10) V4 C G d'� �► i �� 8 � � c 6 -q 7,1 C, 10 C -v C ��, �v �-G 11 As 1 ! ""' 52�1- q-hv(o SUSHI IMARI -qq— # NAME ADDRESS or PHONE # SIGN U jq t W�3 2 �bn cJMescA qZ 6 A=kv} 8 C—L 10 'T oc,,4--k Alia, IlCkT SUSHI I MART —100 — 4M # NAME ADDRESS or PHONE # SIGN 2 3 Joy � (DOD 4 5 yl- jo 2- 6 325 Scon Lean gAq)c i 3 - ) 8 cj�*esiK� (,a5 fAt5G/ C11- ` 02k,, g M; ifs MO—a" z z r� - ����� 73s Jszv 10 �� 55 TrAJ � o (qjj)-� Z r Cela Ae o (A CQz, 11 sG� ��-3 �,� Ct (1/4),01 Y,w44 �e6� SUSHI IMARI - M 12 # NAME ADDRESS or PHONE # SIGN 2 2���� pa -4,6 5�. Lcvroe `i2b"l7 •�j16.3UO C,f, '2,j - U -A CuV-\ 4 Z3�� 3 rv[ec cy� C (3:7,3-7_Zl�t 6,799(3:7,3-7 S K�5 cr_ Gig llx 2, V"LA 1G ( - gUz 10 � i��• 1icQC SUSHI IMARI -102 — # NAME ADDRESS or PHONE # SIGN 1 omhq ';�l 5fanfud a 4oK 043 (SVtIIQ CA qZZ IZ- 4Sl 2 (Jared r�2 U I u� q(* 1�1 �A Irm (A q 2t 12 2 �M 4 giLG / l � 'swfttro k-) v ti) ak l l - i 7 +�5 3 OZ CA.gi�Z Afk 10 I A galv7j 11 �f GO HAW 6V`ti -rAL q a a SUSHI IMARI -163- # NAME ADDRESS or r PHONE # SIGN 104e Sly' Ate, � ji7- 7 .7 20, 2�Fz Fj�eenv��ty Ervine, L A y2(-,1 �— z 3 &Hr(ST tNlET m6fzGftN L42q-h-WD6"jm coS-rM,tsft 4 i � � s �� sz�-�49 cv-,S� CA IUIIS9 N -m) -� - 2-q 2�°► wZvi Ave �JLA AT k h<2�b-h , K, I S 02 Uo16)9(10- [7 (C5 C, 1ps we -s � me,,ry ,kms C1''n) - &40 10 n v h c GAS+ � V Oto "I cti e -f vr- O s-t� LINA Co q fe z, rA g2to27 lei - o o - 4D191 SUSHI IMARI -I64— # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 2 110 P 6 5�� v 13op po e) qjpej) b2�7 Adobc Cerck< 7Z_o -2S7 CSS thc,CA !h2 8 � v v� -? f= z a —71V5W&4 ueob e A tlA — 9 Ayv� ��--A-- CQ--btk�kv (AA -114 W4�/Aeel of? 0% 2ct0 S -b 10 gc:�5 8 FdLaj AVa 30 SUSHI IMARI -) Oa— ul # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 1 MkV, tA- 4 CoA5 64 CA 90 8 )o, c, y , oto) g 46 ���.�-✓ tql 10 -z/o 2, 1 610 apt� SUSHI IMARI -- I b(o,-- ku v �f # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN OCAW,V"ll Li 2 5cO/A 3 '90,v;.cA --1 ` ?G 6 10 SUSHI I MART l orl # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 2 �� hQ� . `,�� � -7(lf D 447,, .:" � 4Vh�A„N 11.11 g11To' co, - cA n 318 5i j o35, 8 G����3'�� 10/�'� 11 '1 C`T, r' 1� SUSHI IMARI # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 1 , o � E aV4 2 MCC-> 3 4`� q�2�rzl- 7 8 �� ��.- C��� M�� Imo►. �� 9�-���� Al�k &SA 1 fiE SUSHI IMARI `11 I # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 2 Jao -T .3 C "1 3 Sun Rlo"yxn t.), L( 10-10 � e, py (qvi> '3 1 5 �� hH" �/ �T9.1�YOr C�✓✓�1 l4l he vv I 7 t'INV Lk tI 5i (N v � w e z1ro, NAL. 8 4,0 Aji3-5 cc6TN, �6-5A I -K. q�q-'f63 zzuZ -71 eah 10 Diala� :�� �F 1 �, � �� � `4�{_`�l3soo l 11 SUSHI IMARI j r # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN vlg-( Cflk 12- 714-601—Vit6 0, 4 DUO bt e(Y-Gic, 0 7� ice co � l-q,(7 —�o 5 P 71 31 Cc — LIA (All 5 IV-Kvvf C-A ')12b(-2- 8 MoktAf 3�o& ea,KVWL&,vue- Lx,t,N'O �v-vInj--r CA 19-C t) 9 pamc"ll lo �vc;> 5z, -,51-113 nc, C-c" -t ot4 � 0, CA 9 2�o 67-,2Z, SUSHI IMARI -1- # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 1 A1 ?In Pgrs � 2/S y 0 �qL fo-5ti 3 f ien G13a 5 ,�,v°^ qq� h�ai46� 6 Z-4/4" f- c / 7 L,'5 o r-� �- I Z 8 n(� 2� 53 tem e , PcvC, --qf 4 .-3 13 - Ct>Sta M fs3, CA 3 b5 liq qj�5 F�-kCVVP� N(A)C)A- R62ctch CA --3tq (o 10 Qq oatief�w a�q y t � MVVA (a'►r Cfiq7b L41 42 11 Se C""(z oq,45-:�z SUSHI IMARI —112— SUSHI IMARI —11.3- NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 2 kl'f ol PC 3 4 5 "IPA ca 92koO c--,) co 6 V I'r rt tA 20--5 0 5, A- Ct/Z,6 /a 7 SIC q) 8 Pr CA I It, 10 I S"t \r'e 0 S' 11 "lum1"t Y - SUSHI IMARI —11.3- # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 1 '10(l ��' -7'`t --7r7_ Qsul Vu /� /�/` ot { C. le ` T� L cA 7 rte(FS'7 INS vwvr� )17 1 CIA 4 Ok" A� lv'l (-- c6A"- a 5 kh qo?14cY-*o hk `M 1 )�eatA , , GA cto-20 6 ALO X31 ��nt�� ox,k,, tft � !mat (ILViNt eh , 91�/' 40 WC 'IC -1 g LW�TWnij 9 � X64 10 �ji CJS�n�ZG4G &Ic 7 1 orf Ave IJ 'A yl + I' n 11 (i n lo/c/ Ofu o Y4-� n02-, IV C-0 C. °a -"-t 14,.6 - I 2,V �t� ) r s SUSHI IMARI W # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 1 -515 Cu4tr 2 4 �W 5 , � h�S ZW1� S'�'� �� CW 2 21 I'10 jl&-06 7 vsle� Ave'. VVA V -n rW n tat r) 8 032 Yl, q C -A qufil-4- lo ev, SUSHI IMARI -115- # NAME ADDRESS PHONE # SIGN 3 4 s �1 -7q9 - 1 s� 'A 7 8 9 10 11 SUSHI IMARI ORANGE C011NiY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION FOR ORANGE COUNTY .. z 3160 Airway Avenue - Costa Mesa, California 92626 - 949.252.5170 Fax. 949.252.6012 July 26, 2016 Mel Lee, Senior Planner City of Costa Mesa/Development Services 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92628 Subject: City of Costa Mesa 375 Bristol St. Mixed -Use Storage and Food Retail Project Dear Mr. Lee: During the meeting held on July 21, 2016 the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County considered the subject project. The matter was duly discussed, moved. seconded. and carried unanimously by the Commission to find the City of Costa Mesa 375 Bristol Street Mixed -Use Storage and Food Retail Project to be Consistent with the Commission's Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for John Wayne Airport (JWA). Please contact Lea Choum, at (949) 252-5123 or via email at lchoum a ocair.com if you require additional information or have questions regarding this proceeding. Sincerely. Kari A. Rigoni Executive Officer Dan's AutoCare Express, Inc. 375 S. Bristol St. # 90 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714-979-6630 September 10, 2016 Mr. Mel Lee City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Re: Support for Revised Development at 375 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa Dear Mr. Lee, 1 testified before the Costa Mesa Planning Commission on June 13, 2016 in opposition to the re- development plan for 375 Bristol Street and now would like to withdraw my opposition. I have met with the owners/developers and appreciate their willingness to modify their original plan in response to the Planning Commissions concerns. We feel the revised plan is a good one and we now support this project. We believe the changes made to the original plan will make for a better and more successful project. It will help my business and the people we serve here in Costa Mesa. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Dan Krogh Dan's Autocare Express pll-� COLGAN, JULIE Subject: letter of support From: jino yu [mailto:cinehaus7@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 4:15 PM To: LEE, MEL <MEL.LEE@costamesaca.gov> Subject: letter of support September 11,2016 Mr. Mel lee City of Costa Mesa 77 fair drive costa mesa,ca 92626 re: support for revised development at 375 bristol st,costa mesa dear Mr. lee, I testified before the costa mesa planning commission on june 13,2016 in opposition to the redevelopment plan for 375 bristol st and now would like to withdraw my opposition. I have met with the owners/developers and appreciate their willingness to modify their original plan in response to the planning commissions concerns. We Feel the revised plan is good one and we now support this project. we believe the changes made to the original plan will make for a better and more successful project. It will help my business and the people we serve here in costa mesa. Plz feel free to contact me if you have any questions Sincerely Jino yu(sushi imari Japanese restaurant) 375 bristol st, suite 40 costa mesa,ca 92626 -I P- BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL CONCEPT DESIGN 01 JUNE 2016 UPDATE ATTACHMENT ORIGINAL PLANS Refer to pages 161-173 for revised plans. WILE( ARCHITECTS I��SANDERSON Iik�l I►Y U'VE oPMEN' RRLA Richard Ramsey _ancscape Architect CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 VISION & GOALS 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6 COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING USES ARCHITECTURAL SOLUTION ACCESS & CIRCULATION /TRAFFIC IMPACT VIEWS & STREET ACTIVITY LANDSCAPE CONCEPT GREEN INITIATIVES PLANS 12 ELEVATIONS 16 FOOD HALL CONCEPT 21 SELF STORAGE CONCEPT 23 RENDERED VIEWS 25 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT 29 BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL 31 -- WIL EY ARCHITECTS 2 NTRODUCTION EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS & FINANCIAL REALITIES The scope of the project includes the replacement of an oging automotive -related strip mall with a financially sustainable, revers e producing new facility on an extremely environmentally challenged site. 3, 5 Bristol Street is located directly under the departing flight fake -off path from John Wayne Airport and the resulting navigation issues restricting height and noise conditions effectively eliminate uses currently zoned for this parcel (C2 Commercial) including office, hotel and retail. The existing mall has struggled for years to maintain tenants as the need for small, independent auto repair businesses has declined dramatically due to the shift of the major auto manufacturers to focus on maintaining customer loyalty for service, repairs, after- market customization and parts in order to enhance their dealers' profitability. In short, the future of the AutoP'ex ;Mall appears dim. PROPOSED NEW USES This proposal seeks to include a project type somewhat immune to noise problems while still resulting in a financially feasible business model: namely, self -storage. Recent market research shows sufficient dernand for self -storage within the surrounding community in light of current multifamily development under construction as well as in the planning stages. A mixed-use concept for the site will create a balance between the self storage element with relatively infrequent visitors and traffic and a ,\Jbrant food hail building attracting people with unique offerings to enliven the sireetscape with activity. BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HAI l_ G2_.__ Existing conditions. t^J11 EY t-RCHITEl— - INTRODUCTION FOOD HALL DESIGN NARRATIVE & CHARACTER SITE HfST�%RY - FARM AU OI,'iOTI'-,,/E, AVIATION- RELATED TRANSITIONAL SCALE ELEtOENT TO STORAGE BUiLDiNG ACTIVATE STREET EDGE - VIEW INTO EXCITING MTERIOR HONEST, NATURAL [OATERIALS SIMPLE, ., A.IGHTFORWARD ARCHITECTURE 5R!STC,L STREET EXTRA SIC°RAGE & F0� D HALL - � ,�-3 VISION & GOALS 1. Create a new financially sustainable, revenue-producing facility to replace an aging auto repair -related strip mail. 2. Attract visitors with a unique, hip and trendy public market, 3. Saturate user -active spaces with daylight and landscaped vistas. 4. Treat the food hall as a foreground building and locate it at the most visible point on the property. 5. Acoustically shield user -active spaces from airport noise and highway traffic. 6. Include a flexible food hall layout to encourage reconfiguration as needed. 7. Create a distinctive, but simple screen facade at the Bristol - facing side of the storage building. BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL RZA 8. Integrate graphically compelling signage into the ckjiiioing facade with lighting to draw attention from Bristol and the 73 freeway traffic. 9. Provide gated security at entry points to Storage Drive. 10. Separate drive entries for retail and storage. 11. Maximize quantity of roll -up door units, but screen views from Bristol. 12, Provide the optimal mix and size of storage units to meet the projected market demand. 13. Incorporate sustainable, environmentally -friendly features to the maximum extent feasible. WILEY ARCHITECTS 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING USES The site is located at the southern end of Bristol near Campus where the road splits into a frontage road along the 73 Freeway creating only a one-way access to the property. To the West there is a retail shopping center with the Mon Amie Bridal shop and further West the Ayres Hotel. The Newport Beach Golf Course is located to the East and the property line abuts an out-of-bounds area of play. The 55' wide concrete Santa Ana -Delhi Channel Watershed borders the southerly portion of the property creating an opproximately buffer to the closest residential use across the channel. In addition, a 6' -high concrete block wall along this property line acts as on additional protection for residential uses. Operational hours of the storage facility will be limited to a 9-5 daytime access with securit}r access gates and personnel to ruonilor activity to avoid noise and potential disturbance of residential neighbors. Given the current uses and zoning of surrounding parcels, a mixed-use proposal of food -related retail and mini -warehouse appears to be entirely compatible for the neighborhood. BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOEI HA,L COMMERCIAL SANTA ANA COUNTRY CLUB P �P P a COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Site and urban context diagram. COMMERCIAL FFjy �9 y e� oe srp �Fl NEWPORT BEACH GOLF COURSE COM,MERCiAL VVilLEY .RC ATE TS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARCHITECTURAL SOLUTION In order to address City Planning Staff concerns about `storage facility's potential negative impact on a vibrant street -life', this project will include a newer concept in food retail to complement other similar in -and -out, quick serve business nearby along this portion of Bristol. The architectural design proposed will create a prominent foreground' building with the `Bristol Market' by placing the 5,000 SF building centrally and to the front of -the site to allow views driving along Bristol Southbound. The design of the Market building will recall the characteristics of adaptive re -use food hails with a simple and clear abstract architectural form with rich, dark wood exterior siding, expressive signage, a high vaulted, sky4t interior space with exposed structure and systems. This building is envisioned to have acoustical shielding while maintaining daylight and views to surrounding landscaping. Food hall BRISTOL STREET EXTRA. STORAGE & FOOD HALL WILEY ARCHITECTS 7 -) Z� - PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACCESS & CIRCULATIGi�i Multiple access points to the Market have been incorporated to encourage approaches from all sides with convenient vehicle parking and bike racks with a potential for a future bike path connector. TRAFFIC IMPACT Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers, has conducted a Traffic Generation Assessment using new driveway counts for the site on a 24-hour, AIN, peak hour, and FM peak hour basis at the two existing driveways along Bristol using video cameras "observing" for a recent weekday. They prepared preliminary trip generation estimates showing that Me proposed project generally results in fewer trips than the existing site. This report has been submitted and accepted by the City of Costa Mesa. 73 FWY i i CAR ACCESS ...... BRISTOL STREET ADA ACCESS -,R C1kCULA11CN FOOD HALL AGE Vehicular, bicycle and AGA access diagram. BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL WILEY ARCHITECTS 8 _],n- PROJECT DESCRIPTION VIE\NS & STREET ACTIVITY A large amount of glass will open Lip the space to the outside, providing a strong connection between indoor and outdoor. The ability to see octivity;nside mckes a lively and interesting fa4ccle along Bristol, during both daytime and evening hours. Patrons will be able to enjoy views of the surrounding landscaping and airport traffic. The proposed food vendor mix is thought to be local chefs and entrepreneurs providing unique offerings that vvill provide Costa toesa citizens with additional high-quality, good -value food choices. The self storage component of the project will pro,',ide 744 storage units of varying sizes equaling 0/8,800 SF with a 1,200 SF management office. This two-story structure has been sited to the rear of the properly, utilizing the existing grades ',a i-ninimize the massing as the lot slo;Des down from Bristol toward the Santa Ana Delhi Channel which borders the South side. The storage building will include the some dark wood siding as the tAarket buildinig to accent the vertical circulation with a custom - fabricated metal fc(;ode cbote 'o add interest, articulation and richness to the building F'orking !at vies/ tov\/ards food hall. , BRISTOL STREET E),,TRP-, S TOR A,GE & FOOD HALL j,; C, C HI T r:T ­- I 21S - PROJECT DESCRIPTION GREEN INITIATIVES NET ZERO ENERGY SITE - ULTRA LOVV ENERG" USE COOL ROOF AVOIDS HEAT G.A,IN 01AF ' POYER GENERATION WITH ROOF TOP SOLAR 0 0 VEGETATED SVY.IkLES, PERVIOUS PA\/Et\/iENT FOR ��'I illi'vVV/,TER ,--/-1,\PTURE, FILTRATION RECREATION - CONVENIEN'T I To BIKE PATH USE OF SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS WITH RECYCLED CO NITENT I r - NATURALLY 'vEN7iL/-,\TED BUILDING LOW ENERGY LED LIGHTING AND DA'sLiGHTINIG URBAN GARDEN FOR FOOD PRODUCTION! NATIVE. DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTINGS 'PISTOL STREET E.X'iAl S T O;� �G E & FOOD HALL ARCHITECTSHITECTS . . �2c- PROJECT DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE CC�PIICEPT The new landscape will screen the lower level of the storage building facade and draw attention to the new food market structure. The planting strategy channels the view of the property to the new food retail building from the primary approach and view opportunit, , Southbound along Bristol. Strong diagonal lines of larger scale massed plantings alternate with fields of lower, more open planting, to create effective sight -lines, drawing attention from the street to the new food retail space. Plantings of low-water and drought tolerant species will replace the existing lawn on the landscape strip near the sidewalk. Vertical planting along the North elevation of the storage buildina intended to cover portions of the lower wall will add to the richness of the building face. Entries to the storage units along the North fagade will be softened and screened by these plantings as well as the plantings above along the Bristol Street frontage. Landscape diagram. ;_ - BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD H._L '�NlLF ARC - - - - 1 30` SITE PLAN Exerrq arra WALL SEE LVIMCM-E BRISTOL STREET 6 -0 -HIGH SCREEN WALL / l i GNANNEL EXISTING "CNAN/ LM FENCE V \ m v Do I. m D n x c� PROJECT INFORMATION: O PARKING STALL COUNT: r- -TI n LOT AREA ,O PARKING - OFFICE C X 1200 SF X 4 s 5 C GOURMET FOOD HALL AREA 5.000 SF m (t(VOWBf) for 3,000 of 3000 SF X 10.30 7 A' TALL STORAGE AREA 98,800 SF -STEEL PICKFT (12100W over 3,000 sf 2000 SF X 12.24 GATE WI SLIDING 744 UMh 1200 - 4 SECTIONS OFFICE AREA 1.200 SF 'SIDE (1200 Iib) SETBACK TOTAL BUILDING AREA 105,000 SF E (STING (63) REQUIRE] CHAIN LIN( FENCE 16' sm. SEWER EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT #85443]37 EXISTING "CNAN/ LM FENCE V \ --t5'-O-BAK SEWER EASEMENT `J PROJECT INFORMATION: PARKING STALL COUNT: PER DOCUMENT (� #85443737 [ - LOT AREA 138,487 SF PARKING - OFFICE (411WOsf) 1200 SF X 4 s 5 C GOURMET FOOD HALL AREA 5.000 SF PARKING - RESTAURANT (t(VOWBf) for 3,000 of 3000 SF X 10.30 a� ` STORAGE AREA 98,800 SF PARKING - RESTAURANT (12100W over 3,000 sf 2000 SF X 12.24 P 744 UMh 1200 - 4 OFFICE AREA 1.200 SF PARKING - STORAGE (1200 Iib) TOTAL BUILDING AREA 105,000 SF TOTAL REQUIRED (63) REQUIRE] BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL _.. 1 31 AREA AND PERCENTAGE OF 20,752 SF OR 1590 , `" "` • • •" . •___ LOT DEVOTED TO OPEN SPACE AREA AND PERCENTAGE OF 62,474 SF OR 45% LOT DEVOTED TO DRIVEWAY AND OPEN PARKING WILEY ARCHITECTS TRASH ENCLOSURE STORAGE SPACE GROUND FLOOR PLAN i u Lu ............ ...... ...... .. .................... J-1r)J[ -E m� 000 MARKET SCALE 010' 20' 50' SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" _.T_ _ ._) BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL WILEY ARCHITECTS 13 _132_ STORAGE SPACE SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE I —Aq i 0 10' 20' S0' tar ;CALK 1116=1'-0" w.— BRISTOL STREETEXTRA STORAGE &FOOD !SAL !_ WILEY ARCHITECTS 14 STORAGE SPACE ROOF PLAN BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL 34 _.-- WILEY ARCHITECTS 15 NORTH ELEVATIONS FOOD HALL (1) STORAGE (2) BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL 1 �5-- WILEY ARCHITECTS 16 SOUTH ELEVATIONS FOOD HALL (3) STORAGE (4) BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL WILEY ARCHITECTS 17 EAST ELEVATIONS FOOD HALL (1) STORAGE (2) T-0'TN STEEL GATE W/ SWINGING SECTIONS BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL I T - R COLUMN STOREFRONT WILEY ARCHITECTS 18 WEST ELEVATIONS FOC STORAGE (2) BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL _ Y-39 TO. PARAPET. 24'-0' / :V 11 O GROUtm LEVEL; *3'-P IXISTMG GRADE ! T.O. PARAPET 9 LEVEL TWO p ia.o• g GROUND LEVEL WILEY ARCHITECTS 19 EXISTING SCREEN WALL EXISTING SCREEN WALL (1) ERISTt.)L STREET EXTRA STORAGE & 1=C_ Cj D HA.L. i scr VV 1 L E r A R C H 1 T ECTS 20 FOOD HALL CONCEPT MASSING STUDIES & BUILDING FORM PRECEDENTS n . -- ;n DUSTR L SAWTOOTH CLERESTORIES l� BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL AiILEY ARCHITECTS 2i _. (-40 FOOD HALL CONCEPT REFERENCE IMAGES BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL SELF STORAGE CONCEPT Fr'-'\CADE PRECEDENTS Tow ilk BRiSTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD WILE) SRC-HHTECTS SELF STORAGE CONCEPT FACADE PRECEDENTS ��iir�i I 1'T71 BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & FOOD HALL .00 J. VOLE'S ARCHITECTS 2) 4 RENDERED VIEWS r ERI�L V 1 E W i;- STEEET E=:TF.`'. STORAGE FOOD HALL I mom IN 1. q lot, &4 1, o w. - It. USTOL STREET MARS im BNOL—Sib —Mil 'rT 4 M'47 RENDERED VIEWS 2 FOOD HALL 4 3 E3 5 R! S, T OL STREET EXTF, ' STOP A.GE & FOOD HALL '7 vVILEY 4.P.CHITECTS 2 3 SELF STORAGE BRISTOL S T P E E T E X T P A STORAGE & F 0 C) D H A L L 9 ff 011 '-*,f !&,RCHITECTIQ LANDSCAPE CONCEPT ACCENTUATE THE ARCHITECTURE WATER SAVINGS LOW MAINTENANCE & LONG-LIVED SEASONAL COLOR & INTEREST BRIS'f OL STREET EXTRA STO R 4\GE & FG, -_N D H/--, .MEN, Fj- 'IN LANDSCAPE PROJECT GOALS Project goals are To reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff entering into the municipal storm sewer network, to increase water quality, and to enhance the site and streetscape with regards to aesthetics, resiliency and plant longevity. PROJECT GOALS 10 -YEAR STORM RETENTION INTEGRATION OF HABITAT AND ECOLOGY INTEGRATION OF GREENSPACE FOR RETENTION/DETENTION REDUCE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES Runoff can be decreased by reducing the amount of impervious surfaces with planting, and with the use of pervious pavements. SLOW RUNJOFF increase the amount of time required for stormwater to runoff into municipal drains, thereby reducing the peak volurne that occurs within the drainage system, helping to reduce do-vy-nstream flooding. This can be accomplished with the construction of properly located rain gardens, the use of pervious paving strategies, and the use of cisterns or rain barrels. INCREASE RUNOFF QUALITY, DECREASE RUNOFF QUANTITY Through the thoughtful °mplementation cf sustainable stormwater management strategies, the amount of stormwater runoff reaching city drains and pumps wculd be reduced, while the quality of stormwater runoff would be increased. ENCOURAGE INFILTRATION INTO SOILS Intentionally draining info rain gardens or vegetated swales allows runoff to infiltrate into the groundwater table and to be uptake by trees and plants. NATIVE LANDSCAPING The use of native trees and landscape materials con help uptake stormwoter after rain events. Natives are preferable because they are already suited to the climatic conditions of the region, can thrive with reduced supplemental irrigation, and are more resistance to peas and diseases. BRISTOL STPEET EXTRA STC R' L GE & FCOD HALL ;ICHA.RD R�-ivSSEY 30 LANDSCAPE GREEN INITIATIVE STORMWATER v EGETATED SWALES BENEFITS L -'-7 Vegetated swales will be used to convey storrnwater towards drainage features, intercepting runoff from the parking lots, thereby encouraging infiltration into the groundwater table and filtering contaminants out of stormwater prior +c overflow into the city drainage system. Runoff will be redirected through curb breaks into an infiltration trench, or atop a subsurface storage device, with the goal of increasing infiltration and detention. PERVIOUS PAVING - ,n selected parking areas, pervious paving will be used in to reduce runoff by allowing stormwater to be absorbed into the ground. Each porkIng space will have walking aisles on either side, comfor'104bie for all types cf shoes. REDUCED STORNAMATER RUNOFF INCREASED GROUNDW.�TER QUALITY INCREASED INFILTRATION INTO GROUNDWATER TABLE INCREASED EN'V'IRONMENTAL QUALITY RICHARD R ""-\ fO S E Y 3-1 BRISTOL -0 T R E E T E X T R.A STORAGE & F C, C- 7' LANDSCAPE GREEN INITIATIVE RAISED BED EDIBLE GARDENS An area of the new food court yard will be devoted to an edible garden in raised beds. CAFE SEATING Outdoor seating will be tucked in among the garden beds, BRISTOL STREET EXTRA T LANDSCAPE PLAN ------------ --------=------=------=-----==------ ----- ------- 17 i/;� BRISTCIL STREET EXTRA STC ? 4GE s C, -1572- I . 1S2- 1. New disabled compliant parking w/ required signage 2. New Accessible path of travel 3. New outdoor cafe seating 4. New Bicycle parking 5. New Raised Bed Edible Garden 6. New planter 7. New trash enclosure 8. New pervious pavement parking 9. New decomposed granite surfaces 10. New Vegetated drainage Swales 11. (E) Sidewalk 12. (E) Entry/Exit Drive RICHARD R?.MSE f TYP EXISTING OIITIET TO OCFOD CHANNEL STRUCTURAL BAP% OSTORM DRAW SYSTEM STENCILING MTC SIGNAGE OEFFICIENT IRRIGATION ANO LANDSCAPE DESIGN O3 TRASH ENCLOSURE AREA NON-SIRUCi1RUl BMPB OLANDSWE MAINTENANCE AYI UTTER CONTROL OCATCH BASIN AND INLET INSPECTION ® STREET SWEEPING BIOTREATMENT BMP's Brow BIOFILTRATION PLANTER BO% BW IB 9IGRE1DfnoW WITH UNDERDRAIN m I�'MxTiRP a N «Ni MIO FoonNL PER 31ROCRlRAL RAN LEGEND PROPERTY UNE PRCP04D ATMOY piAln PP 0.AM r 6' �'COBBLES LANDSCAPED AREA r____ ---___.T BORETENTION AREA R LURE \ CPENRGS PfR �w®LN GRAMNO PLWB >• >• B� DRAINAGE BOUNDARY STORM DRAIN ------------ ------------------- DRAINAGE BOUNDARY P -r MA i DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION A-1 DRAINAGE SUB -AREA LABEL SUB -AREA SIZE (avo) r YULCII ;i.1A BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE & EOOD HALL ADN11fNK WAIERPRODRNG TYP EXISTING OIITIET TO OCFOD CHANNEL STRUCTURAL BAP% OSTORM DRAW SYSTEM STENCILING MTC SIGNAGE OEFFICIENT IRRIGATION ANO LANDSCAPE DESIGN O3 TRASH ENCLOSURE AREA NON-SIRUCi1RUl BMPB OLANDSWE MAINTENANCE AYI UTTER CONTROL OCATCH BASIN AND INLET INSPECTION ® STREET SWEEPING BIOTREATMENT BMP's Brow BIOFILTRATION PLANTER BO% BW IB 9IGRE1DfnoW WITH UNDERDRAIN m I�'MxTiRP a N «Ni MIO FoonNL PER 31ROCRlRAL RAN PRCP04D ATMOY piAln PP 0.AM r 6' �'COBBLES PROPOSED RETANMG wALL R LURE \ CPENRGS PfR �w®LN GRAMNO PLWB _ P -r MA i r YULCII _ ADN11fNK WAIERPRODRNG DY BOeDIRG AB �®fC Pos LAM -Neave ABA^RR x' wx uNPaRY wx ar sANc AMD OAGAML e00H Ae e' RISER PPE (I]F�iTMt%: R!f NWIFt LPD* NRL IMRl1Nn[N WnLvWLA RATE S' PER NdM PER P AN RiEN FABIMC Pvc aneT NAE INxEAT PDL aAouc aLAR PK Q]1FCTpR PPE LarAiKM PEA GGdNG R'� 6' PfRFUUICD PPfS SPEOFlGTroNE O 10' D.G IEAIN. PEPS CAL 69-x.025 N016: I. PLAMTEA 5¢E MA LAYOUT PEF RAN BI0-1A: BIOFILTRATION NTS PROPOSED IT RCP PUBLIC STORM ORMN ^STORES . LPEMIMC, / 7.1 I - - - - e• FpMG fMAx.) 't> r YIALR Ze' Yw UNFORY wx 6 SANG GE0."iH(IIIETL MIEN AMO ORGNC YAIENAL AKN BANNER (TTFJ ... AB POST: NAR. IRFlLmnnw RATE r FEM NwP Ir rnA— —1 DLTLTe FAeRIc NOTE R1ER FABNL 6' PDPOtATEp APE I. YE CALadtMM STORYWAIER BLN NANDBDO( BIP M0. lt-]I Epi SLDItE IKObIAnOR. BI0-1B BIORETENTION W/ UNDERDRAIN DETAIL NTS PRELIMINARY WQMP SITE PLAN P S o M A S LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN SCALE 0 10 20 00 700 w v GRA55 taymas hRicoitles lvpvMsa" r -la Cr..." WW Rya I.5' 11000 I Z oc 17-1 8 gown by MevvvvAo^.a Narsry lw ;oM O *h Cx rft, vm] As!pc:ales dna Mavdavis by M., ntlP:t,www.gear+eeonaasspeatcn.�arn VEGEWm Pw9s 1000 si IZ'x IZ'-18" WMNAGE SALE •• •'•! GRASSCREIE i 3 I. Naw tlev camphnt pord gw/ rewired signage 2. Naw accessRle path of hovel ]. New wtdm cos. .,hg 4. Naw Blcvcle P",hg 5. rvew Raisetl Bed Ftlide Gwaon 6. New P.- 7. Naw Basn antivssre B. New Pen-loas pavement P—rg 9. New —.=p— gorib surfaces 10. Naw VePotalea drainage Swalae Ii. (E�Sltlawak 12. (E) Enay/W Dine BRISTOL STREET EXTRA STORAGE 8, FOOD �4AL L RICHARD RAMSEY 35 '5-4 LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS LINES OF AGAVES AGACE AMERICANA (I) CENTURY AGAVE KLEINIA MANDRALISCAE (2) 5LUE CHALK STICK AGAVE PARRYI VAR. TRUNCATA (3) MESCAL AGAVE 0 BRISTOL STREET EXTRA, STCR �-,,GE & FCC' -. RI'�.HARD RANA S _`r 6 LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS SWATHS OF NATIVE GRASS LEYMUS TRITICOIDES LAGUNITATM CREEPING WILD RYE Leymus triticoides "Lagunita' is clearly a drought tolerant native grass. Established plantings will survive without summer water and have stayed green without irrigation well into August depending on annual rainfall. Very little summer water is required to keep the plant evergreen. Water requirements to keep it evergreen vary with soil type and location but typically one or two watering per month will keep the plantings green. Leymus triticoides Lagunita grows upright, 12"-18" tall. It is currently being tested as a 'mowed lawn'. it has been tested at a 4" maintained height and on going studies wiil determine its suitability for mowing height at 1 "-2". Leymus triticoides "Lagunita' is easy to mow with a conventional mower or string trimmer making it for easier than its densely clumping or tall native grass cousins. Depending on soil type, fertility, moisture levels and time of year, planting from plugs 12" on -center can be a solid turf in 60- 90 days. Flowering perennials, showy flowers accent grasses and flowering bulbs are easily added to plantings of Leymus triticoides "Lagunita'. Its low rich green foliage makes an excellent ground cover gross for both natural lawns and meadows. ERI TCL STREET RICHARD RAMSEr 37 EXTR/-, STOP, -.,,GE & FOOD HALL LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS SWATHS OF NATIVE GRASS FESTUCA MA/RE/ (I) ATLAS FESCUE This long-lived evergreen ciur aping grass is one of my go -to grasses for making meadows in a Mediterranean climate. In large scale plantings it's hard to beat the Atlas fescue as a good long lived ground cover base planting. Plant plants 3-3.5 on -center with filler grasses, plugs and accent grasses planted in between. Long lived. Atlas fescue is drought tolerant but needs some summer water to be successful. Established plantings should stay `green' with 1-3 waterings per month in most soils and all but high desert climates. This is a go -to grass for sunny Mediterranean meadows. It's foliage looks good year round and is a great blending color with drought tolerant plants. One of the best ground cover grasses. MUHLENBERG/A DUBIA (2) PINE MUHLY Dependable gray green foliage in meadow settings. Its tidy gray foliage grows to 3' in dense clumps. The silvery gray slender flowers are showy and neat on the plant from summer to fall. if is drought tolerant and grows in a wide variety of soils. Best in full sun. Plant from plugs 2-3 FT on center. Pine Muhly is best in dry summer climates. BRISTOL STREET EXTRA. STORAGE & FOOD HALL RICHARD RA..MSEY 38 STREET' MARKET 375 BRISTOL STORAGE AND RETAIL 30 AUGUST 2016 , I cj- Fv!`�- # REVISED PLANS WILEY ARCHITECTS A 202'-9" PROPOSED STORAGE BUILDING 0 m BRISTOL STREET / / / / / / / / / / 15 VIDE SEWER EASENT 47 — — — — _ 8T-3" , 121'-9" lfWoo.FN OFFICE 1,ow SF 9191m r e� — ._iDE SEWER EPSEnEkT -- — _ _ — _— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5,--- — — --- 147-4 11 3xI — - PARKING CALCULATIONS PARKING RETAIL, AUTOMOTIVE PARKING OFFICE PARKING RESTAURANT PARKING RESTAURANT PARKING STORAGE PARKING TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED BUILDING AREAS 8810 SF X 4 = 36 STORAGE LEVEL 1 44,455 SF STORAGE LEVEL 2 45,455 SF TOTAL STORAGE 89,910 SF OFFICE 1,000 SF AUTO RETAIL 8,500 SF RESTAURANT 4,000 SF TOTAL 103,410 SF Architectural Site Plan ---Vo p- 4/1000 8810 SF X 4 = 36 4/1000 1000 SF = 4 10/1000 FOR 3000 3000 SF X 10 = 30 12/1000 OVER 3000 1000 X 12 = 12 1/200 UNITS 719 UNITS = 4 86 SPACES 93 SPACES WILEY ARCHITECTS August ?g, 201 North Elevation South Elevation West Elevation I o000000C�G-JC�C�C�C�� N Exterior Elevations East Elevation WILEY ARCHITECTS August 30, 2016 GATE F i 88 2,200 141 RdkM 18 KI 3l 14,700 SF. QTY. Door Unh 1c, 5 302 5 a 7-R OFFICE 51' S 1,028 SF ib-USL'z K ill. sC x, 1 50 1 5, 1 F - 9C ?cc 152 0( i'le, 52 ;t:u K 3 51 tl, 25 25 - 1,w [c, 1c, - cc a -osLEy 150 Ill 5c51i51) 1 5" 's SUITE 4V 1 Ep 1,200 SF 5i 15, ioc icl' lex.lL 5' i53 15� 30 B: 21,040 SF % ioc I GO 5c lc i5c 5G 51 51 UNITS 1st FLOOR '0' A: 23,385 SF ......... 3HR- RATED WALL SEPARATION. CONSTRUCTION TYPE AND BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED. SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0' First Floor Plan �92-- ZRIM SUITE 30 4,960 SF 2nd FLOOR QTY. SO, FT. 88 2,200 141 RdkM 18 1,440 SIZE 14,700 SF. QTY. Door Unh SO. FT. 5 x 5 a 25 9 0 225 5 X 10 = 50 71 (1) 3,550 10 x 8 m 80 22 14 1,760 10 X 10 = 100 72 7,200 10 X 15 = 150 47 (6) 7,050 10 X 20 = 200 35 (35) 7,000 10 X 25 m 250 11 (11) 2,750 10 X 27.5 = 275 3 (3) 826 10 X 30 = 300 14 (14) 4,200 TOTAL 284 (70) 34,560 GSF 44,425 EFFICIENCY FACTOR 77.8% First Floor Plan �92-- ZRIM SUITE 30 4,960 SF 2nd FLOOR QTY. SO, FT. 88 2,200 141 7,050 18 1,440 147 14,700 41 6,150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 435 31,540 45,453 69A% SUITE 1,870 SF TOTAL RETAIL: 12,480 SF UNIT TOTAL DAN'S AUTO CARE a7S,ANDVdCH QTY. , z WORLD SUITE 15 SUITE 10 1T970 SF = 2.480 SF TOTAL RETAIL: 12,480 SF 719 100% 66,100 89,878 73.5% Q WILEY ARCHITECTS august 30, 20 16 " 41 UNIT TOTAL %Dw QTY. uwrs SO. FT. 97 13.5% 2,425 212 29.5% 10,600 40 5.6% 3,200 219 30.5% 21,900 88 12.2% 13,200 35 4.9% 7,000 11 1.5% 2,750 3 0.4% 825 14 1.9% 4,200 719 100% 66,100 89,878 73.5% Q WILEY ARCHITECTS august 30, 20 16 " 41 m ©©00 o®®® _� ®®■®e®penis■®■ ®®®®e 5 = 25 9 ®®®e ■■■■■■ ®eeeeeeeeeee© eee®®®e �■ ©e®®©© m©®©©®m®®©°m ®mom ®o ■ e e®■■■■ 5 = 25 9 225 ■■■■■■ ®eeeeeeeeeee© 50 71 (1) 3,550 10 X 8 = �■ ©e®®©© m©®©©®m®®©°m ®mom ®o ■ e e®■■■■ 5 = 25 9 225 ■■■■■■ ®eeeeeeeeeee© 50 71 (1) 3,550 +30 25 25 H+0 11Y 25 25 10c 25 25 ,00 1W 100 25 25 ,:-A d0 50 Se S3 25 50 50 25 25 80 50 50 1 5C 1 50 1 50 I 50 1251 100 ,10 100 150 ta'r) 25 SC 50 25 25 25 ZS 25 50 1 50 1 SC 1 50 1 5C I 5C 25 150 15C 1% 150 15C 150 100 -Ab 100 100 ''1.7 1= 5C 100 iW ix Ise iso Ise 1' zs p B: 22,068 SF w ,eo too � 1s0 1:: ,50 100 ,00 15 �_- 50 'DO 2" 00 (113, 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 (117, BG BC 6. 9C a0 90 25 (ISi (751 I%'S) 1I5, (,51 50 / �• ee■®■®e 50 50 50 50 50 ,°U /•- UNITS 1st FLOOR w so se u; �,, RoIWp SIZE SF. QTY. Door Unit er I +_>f I _ I I .0a 1 toe 1 +oo I me 1 100 A: 23.385 SF ......... 3HR-RATED WALL SEPARATION. CONSTRUCTION TYPE AND BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED. SQ. FT. 5 X 5 = 25 9 225 5 X ®eeeeeeeeeee© 50 71 (1) 3,550 10 X 8 = 80 22 97 1,760 10 X 10 = 100 ®eeeeeeeee1e© 29.5% 7,200 10 X 15 = 150 47 +30 25 25 H+0 11Y 25 25 10c 25 25 ,00 1W 100 25 25 ,:-A d0 50 Se S3 25 50 50 25 25 80 50 50 1 5C 1 50 1 50 I 50 1251 100 ,10 100 150 ta'r) 25 SC 50 25 25 25 ZS 25 50 1 50 1 SC 1 50 1 5C I 5C 25 150 15C 1% 150 15C 150 100 -Ab 100 100 ''1.7 1= 5C 100 iW ix Ise iso Ise 1' zs p B: 22,068 SF w ,eo too � 1s0 1:: ,50 100 ,00 15 �_- 50 'DO 2" 00 (113, 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 (117, BG BC 6. 9C a0 90 25 (ISi (751 I%'S) 1I5, (,51 50 / �• ee■®■®e 50 50 50 50 50 ,°U /•- UNITS 1st FLOOR w so se u; �,, RoIWp SIZE SF. QTY. Door Unit er I +_>f I _ I I .0a 1 toe 1 +oo I me 1 100 A: 23.385 SF ......... 3HR-RATED WALL SEPARATION. CONSTRUCTION TYPE AND BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED. SQ. FT. 5 X 5 = 25 9 225 5 X 10 = 50 71 (1) 3,550 10 X 8 = er I +_>f I _ I I .0a 1 toe 1 +oo I me 1 100 A: 23.385 SF ......... 3HR-RATED WALL SEPARATION. CONSTRUCTION TYPE AND BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED. SQ. FT. 5 X 5 = 25 9 225 5 X 10 = 50 71 (1) 3,550 10 X 8 = 80 22 97 1,760 10 X 10 = 100 72 29.5% 7,200 10 X 15 = 150 47 (6) 7,050 10 X 20 = 200 35 (35) 7,000 10 X 25 = 250 11 (11) 2,750 10 X 27.5 = 275 3 (3) 825 10 X 30 = 300 14 (14) 4,200 0 TOTAL 14 284 (70) 34,560 31,540 GSF 100% 66,100 44,425 EFFICIENCY FACTOR 89,878 77.8% Second Floor Plan 2nd FLOOR UNIT TOTAL % DIST QTY. SQ. FT. QTY. uNlrs SQ. FT. 88 2,200 97 13.5% 2,425 141 7,050 212 29.5% 10,600 18 1,440 40 5.6% 3,200 147 14,700 219 30.5% 21,900 41 6,150 88 12.2% 13,200 0 0 35 4.9% 7,000 0 0 11 1.5% 2,750 0 0 3 0.4% 825 0 0 14 1.9% 4,200 435 31,540 719 100% 66,100 45,453 89,878 69.4% 73.5% WILEY ARCH iiE(--TS Augu=t 30, zo f e 3. n TREE Cupressus sempw:ern Tiny Tower® Italian Cypress 25G 18 5'I.1'w 10't x 7w 4. New bicycle pocking 'Monsher P.P. *12933 Tiny 5. New trash enclosure Tower(9 6. New decomposed granite surface 7. )E) Sidewalk BIORETENTION Mixed species TBD oW 1000 sf 17 oc 12"-18" 8. )E) Entry/Exit Drive AREA M9h 9. )N) Bbretenilon area I I LANDSCAPE + PLANTING PLAN 2 1 PLANT LEGEND Landscape Plan --44- 3 1 1 FGFNn + KFY NOTES WILEY ARCHITECTS August 30, 2-016 RR TCTnT CTCYP A ('TF EXISTING OUTLET TO OCFCD CHANNEL LEGEND STRUCTURAL BWs STORM DRAIN SYSTEM EXISTING OUTLET TO OCFCD CHANNEL - PROPERTY LINE O STENCILING AND SIGNAGE PROPOSED SCREEN 1 EFFICIENT IRRIGATION AND 1 N3 NII ' - DRAIN -� OTRASH 7YP. BIORETENTION AREA 6" GIM WITH- OM. PER NONSTRUCTURAL BMP's STRUCTURAL BWs STORM DRAIN SYSTEM EXISTING OUTLET TO OCFCD CHANNEL - PROPERTY LINE O STENCILING AND SIGNAGE PROPOSED SCREEN 1 EFFICIENT IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPED AREA / WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN DRAIN -� OTRASH ENCLOSURE AREA BIORETENTION AREA 6" GIM WITH- OM. PER NONSTRUCTURAL BMP's O LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DRAINAGE BOUNDARY WATERPRO PLANTER WALL L A OF MLANTE NE WALL AND FOOTING Nn UTTER CONTROL - ----- --- STORM DRAIN Niq CATCH BASIN AND INLET MULCH INSPECTION --------------'---' N15 STREET SWEEPING DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION ADDITIONAL WATERPROOFING r RISER - _ BIOTREATMENT BMP's / B/O-1A BIOFILTRATION PLANTER BOX A-� DRAINAGE SUB -AREA LABEL BI41B BIORETENTION WITH UNDERDRAIN i; -SUB -AREA SIZE (acres) Water Quality Management I.5 PVC OUTLET PIPE, INVERT PER GRADING PLAN 6" PVC PERFORATED PIPE -�� 12" MIN CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL PER CALTRANS SPECIFICATIONS 66-1.025 NOTES 1. PLANTER SIZE AND LAYOUT PER PLAN BI0-1A: BIOFILTRATION PLANTER BOX NTS 6" CURB t GUTTER LIMITS OF BIORETENTION W/ CURB OPENINGS PER PLAN PER GRADING PLANS '\ �6" %ATINM STONES ES O iX MIN OPENINGS .5.1 - 6" PONDING (MAX) 12" MIN 24" MN UNIFORM MIX OF SAND GEKSYNTHEIC WATERS AND ORGANIC MATERIAL SUCH BARRIER (TP) AS COMPOST: MN. INFILTRATION RATE 5" PER HOUR O12" GRAVEL JACKET FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC 8" PERFORATED PIPE NOTES: 1. SEE CALIFORNIA STMMWATER BMP HANDBOOK BMP NO. TC -32 FOR MORE INFORMATION. BI0-1B BIORETENTION WJ UNDERDRAIN DETAIL NTS PRELIMINARY WQMP SITE PLAN P S O M A S WILEY ARCHITECTS August 301 2016 PROPOSED SCREEN / WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL PROPOSED A DRAIN -� AND STRUCTURAL PLANS 6" GIM WITH- OM. PER RESERpR 16" \ PERPLAB l -CONCRETE OR OTHER STRUCTURAL GRADING PLANS r DEPTH \ SFS WATERPRO PLANTER WALL L A OF MLANTE NE WALL AND FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL PLAN MULCH 3" ADDITIONAL WATERPROOFING r RISER - _ _ -.. - PIPE / FILTER FABRIC 24" MIN UNIFORM MIX OF SAND AND ORGANIC MATERIAL SUCH AS COMPOST: MIN. INFILTRATION TF PER PLAN 1 RATE 5" PER HOUR - PVC OUTLET PIPE, INVERT PER GRADING PLAN 6" PVC PERFORATED PIPE -�� 12" MIN CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL PER CALTRANS SPECIFICATIONS 66-1.025 NOTES 1. PLANTER SIZE AND LAYOUT PER PLAN BI0-1A: BIOFILTRATION PLANTER BOX NTS 6" CURB t GUTTER LIMITS OF BIORETENTION W/ CURB OPENINGS PER PLAN PER GRADING PLANS '\ �6" %ATINM STONES ES O iX MIN OPENINGS .5.1 - 6" PONDING (MAX) 12" MIN 24" MN UNIFORM MIX OF SAND GEKSYNTHEIC WATERS AND ORGANIC MATERIAL SUCH BARRIER (TP) AS COMPOST: MN. INFILTRATION RATE 5" PER HOUR O12" GRAVEL JACKET FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC 8" PERFORATED PIPE NOTES: 1. SEE CALIFORNIA STMMWATER BMP HANDBOOK BMP NO. TC -32 FOR MORE INFORMATION. BI0-1B BIORETENTION WJ UNDERDRAIN DETAIL NTS PRELIMINARY WQMP SITE PLAN P S O M A S WILEY ARCHITECTS August 301 2016 Longboard Aluminum Siding Wood Finish Light Fir 30 / 30 Sand Finish Stucco Equitone Linea Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete Back Lit 18" Tall Channel Letters Low Iron Glass Storefront Frame Longboard Aluminum Siding Wood Finish Light Fir Exterior Materials ^lLtpv WILEY ARCHITECTS August 30, 2016 Equitone Linea Longboard Light Fir Exterior Materials Back Lit Tenant Signage WILEY ARCHITECTS Awgust 30, 2016 T lop> AO`- qp IT, � 4*11& 40 4* # Aerial View looking West WILEY ARCHITECTS August 30, 201' I C, w� x 1k ?,, _' r u View from Bristol Street looking West —,: (c 5r- r+ WILEY ARCHITECTS August 30, 2016 i 1 4 A -W166- �'� � �. ' �, 1, 4 rI , 1 f I ',y .. ', ��� � � , `' �r � r •/� • _ �� � VA � r/f _ . ,r, .. `\ ,�,, �/' \ �/ . � , •_ :! i `, i � �� �. .� \ ', — ?� gyp,-\ a� , _ �.�;: s. `: / - _ , ��� `� ,' 1 I 1 1 : _ %/Y/ I a • , ` i\� �i � t, ,\ ! �.. i �•I. �1 �- 1 A'.'., t � � � ��l i i f a - _ � -.... _ _� `AN ` i� i /ll��'� - View from Bristol Street sidewalk looking West d i 0 WILEY ARCHITECTS rw,aust 30. 2016 fit If P� � of � l _ 4 View from Bristol Street looking East SIN A WILEY ARCHITECTS Augus. 310, 2016 ATTACHMENT 7 OFFICIAL MINUTE EXCERPTS FROM THE JUNE 13, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING REGARDING BRISTOL AUTOPLEX (Public Hearing No. 5 — R-15-01 and PA -15-30) 5. Application No.: R-15-01 and PA -15-30 Applicant: Annette Wiley Site Address: 375 Bristol Street Zone: Existing: PDC (Planned Development Commercial) Proposed: C2 (General Business District) Project Planner: Mel Lee Environmental Determination: An IS/MND was prepared for the project in accordance with the Lead Agency's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. The IS/MND is available for public review and comment from May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016. The IS/MND found that the environmental effects from the project would be less than significant with the incorporation of standard conditions of approval and compliance with the Code requirements. The proposed project site is not on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Description: The proposed project involves the following: 1. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND): This document analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Significant environmental impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance. 2. Rezone R-15-01: An ordinance to rezone a 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District). 3. Planning Application PA -15-30: Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the demolition of the existing automotive center (Bristol Autoplex) and the development of a two-story, 774 -unit mini -storage facility and 5,000 square -foot food court building. No code deviations are requested. Three ex -parte communications to report: Vice Chair Mathews and Commissioner McCarthy met with the applicant; Chair Dickson spoke with the applicant. Mel Lee, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Vice Chair Mathews asked for clarification on the proposed building height. Mr. Lee responded that the three elevator shafts would be the highest portions of the buildings. Commissioner McCarthy asked for guidance on evaluating the opposition comments made from tenants. Yolanda Summerhill, Deputy City Attorney, responded that the Planning Commission could use broad discretion and would look at how the proposed use is consistent with the findings under the Zoning Code. PUBLIC COMMENTS Paul Freeman, applicant, addressed the public comments about the food tenants and what termination process took place. Mr. Freeman also agrees with the conditions of approval except No. 19. Annette Wiley, architect, presented a slideshow about the proposed application Chair Dickson asked if the applicant would be willing to underground utilities along Bristol Street. Mr. Freeman responded no but he would be willing to pay into a fund for future undergrounding. Mae Ray stated concerns with the noise from the Autoplex and stated the location needs improvement. Hilda Martinez, Costa Mesa resident, spoke in support of the application. Newport Beach resident asked if there was a crime impact report for the application and why there was not 24-hour security required. He also stated concerns with noise, the after hour lighting in the back of the building and suggested raising the wall to eight feet. Chelsie Sharp, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Sherry Kroeg, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Marc Prowse, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Isabella, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Olivia, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Shawn Bean spoke against the application. Dan, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Wonda Pessy, speaking on behalf of Dave Pessy, spoke against the application. Carter Grant, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Heather Davis, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa resident, spoke against the application. George Bean, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Jiyoung Yui, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. John Le, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Tony, tenant at the Autoplex, spoke against the application. Victor Alberez spoke against the application. Teri Taylor spoke against the application. Mr. Freeman responded to the public comments. Commissioner Sesler asked Mr. Freeman if they considered a relocation fee and if it would be an option. Mr. Freeman responded no, they could not afford it but would be willing to discuss rent discounts. Ms. Summerhill reminded the Planning Commission that this action will be going City Council for final approval and during that time some of the potential problems mentioned in this meeting could be resolved. Commissioner Andranian asked the estimated cost of the project. Mr. Freeman stated from 11 to 13 million dollars. The Chair closed the public hearing. Commissioners discussed the project, the impact on the tenants, and whether to approve the project. Vice Chair Mathews asked for clarification if the rezone had to be granted and if it is an act of discretion by the Planning Commission. Mr. Lee responded it is a discretionary act from the Planning Commission and City Council. Chair Dickson asked Mr. Lee to explain the PDC (Planned Development Commercial) zone versus the C2 (General Business District). Mr. Lee responded self -storage is not allowed in the Planned Development Commercial zone which is why the applicant is requesting a rezone to C2 (General Business District). MOTION: Hereby move that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council deny adopting the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the project, deny giving first reading to an ordinance giving Rezone 15-01 and deny Planning Application PA -15-30 a resolution to approve the project for a 774 - unit self -storage facility and 5,000 square -foot food court building at 375 Bristol Street based on the findings for denial with the provision that the applicant work with the affected businesses on relocation plans and relocation assistance prior to the City Council hearing the project. Also, include in the motion for staff to bring to City Council the issue of the number of storage units in the City and the need for them. Moved by Commissioner McCarthy, second by Commissioner Sesler. RESOLUTION PC -16-33 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL NOT ADOPT THE INITIAL STUDYIMITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND DENY REZONE R-15-01 FOR A REZONE OF THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.18 -ACRE DEVELOPMENT SITE FROM PDC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL) TO C2 (GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT), AND DENY PLANNING APPLICATION PA -15-30 FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING AUTOMOTIVE CENTER (BRISTOL AUTOPLEX) AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TWO-STORY, 774 -UNIT MINI -STORAGE FACILITY AND 5,000 SQUARE FOOT FOOD COURT BUILDING AT 375 BRISTOL STREET. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Mathews, McCarthy, Sesler, Andranian Noes: Dickson Absent: None Abstained: None UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED MINUTE EXCERPTS FROM THE OCTOBER 10, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING REGARDING 375 BRISTOL STREET (Public Hearing No. 2 - R-15-01 and PA -15-30) 2. Application No.: R-15-01 and PA -15-30 Applicant: Annette Wiley Site Address: 375 Bristol Street Zone: Existing: PDC (Planned Development Commercial) Proposed: C2 (General Business District) Project Planner: Mel Lee Environmental Determination: An IS/MND was prepared for the project in accordance with the Lead Agency's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. The IS/MND was available for public review and comment from May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016. The IS/MND found that the environmental effects from the project would be less than significant with the incorporation of standard conditions of approval and compliance with the Code requirements. The proposed project site is not on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Description: The proposed project involves the following: 1. Adoption of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND); 2. Rezone R-15-01 for the rezone of a 3.2 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District); and 3. Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the demolition of a portion of the existing automotive strip mall (Bristol Autoplex) and the development of a two-story, 719 - unit mini -storage facility and 12,500 square -foot retail building. The existing three buildings on the site total 38,430 sq. ft.; two buildings and a portion of one building totaling 25,930 sq. ft. will be demolished and the remaining 12,500 sq. ft. retail and tenants will be retained with minor renovations. No code deviations are requested. Four ex -parte communications to report: Chair Dickson, Vice Chair Mathews, and Commissioner Andranian met with the applicant; Commissioner McCarthy spoke with the applicant. Mel Lee, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner McCarthy asked if any changes to the project altered the EIR findings or the trip count. Mr. Lee responded no. Commissioner Sesler asked if staff did an economic analysis. Mr. Lee responded no. PUBLIC COMMENTS — 1-1(p-- Paul Freeman, applicant, has read and agreed with the conditions of approval. He explained the changes to the application and thanked the Commissioners for their direction. Terry Shannon, speaking on behalf of one of the tenants at 375 Bristol Street, stated concerns with the businesses that have to leave and jobs that will be lost; and spoke in opposition to the project. George Bean, tenant (Sandwich World), stated the owners did do an outreach to the tenants and spoke in support of the project. Paul, tenant at 375 Bristol Street, stated the cost of the move would be difficult for his business and the Planning Commission should consider another solution. John, owner of a business at 375 Bristol Street, stated he did not hear from the landlord or owner; he has been a good tenant and asked that the they would reach out to him so his business could stay. Sherry Krogh, President of Dan's Autocare Express, had meet with the current owners and came to an agreement and is happy with the solution. She is thankful the applicant reached out to them and spoke in support of the project. Jiyoung Yui, tenant (Sushi Imari), spoke in support of the project. Mr. Freeman responded to public comments. Commissioner Sesler asked out of the 13 existing tenants how many would be at the new project and how much sales tax would be generated from them. Mr. Freeman responded that there are five spaces available and marginally less sales tax but more property tax. The Chair closed the public hearing. Chair Dickson thanked the Police Department for providing calls for service to the applicant's site and the nearby mini -storage facility at 1275 Bristol Street; and stated that it showed that the calls were less at the 1275 Bristol Street mini -storage facility. Commissioner McCarthy stated it was a much better application than the previous one in June; that the plan is going to be successful; liked that some of the tenants will be staying; and will be supporting the application. Commissioner Sesler stated a concern with the applicant requesting a rezone because it could become an economic loss for the City. — nq Commissioner Andranian stated that the project was an improvement and will be supporting the revised application. He also noted that in the long term the project will be a net gain for the City. Commissioners and staff discussed the rezone and the potential uses if rezoned. Chair Dickson stated supporting the project and encouraged the applicant to speak with all tenants prior to the City Council Meeting. MOTION: Hereby move that the Planning Commission recommends that City Council do as follows: Adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; Recommendation of Rezone R-15-01 for the rezone of 3.18 Acre site from Planned Development Commercial to C2 General Business District; and approval of Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the demolition of a portion of the existing automotive strip mall and the development of a two-story 719 -unit mini -storage facility and 12,500 square -foot retail building at 375 Bristol Street based on the findings set forth in Exhibit A and subject to conditions set forth in Exhibit B. Moved by Commissioner McCarthy, second by Commissioner Andranian. RESOLUTION PC -16-54—A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS: (1) ADOPT THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, (2) APPROVE AND GIVE FIRST READING TO REZONE R-15-01 FOR A REZONE OF THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.18 -ACRE DEVELOPMENT SITE FROM PDC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL) TO C2 (GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT), AND (3) APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION PA -15-30 FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TWO-STORY, 719 - UNIT MINI -STORAGE FACILITY AND 12,500 SQUARE -FOOT RETAIL BUILDING AT 375 BRISTOL STREET The motion carried by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Dickson, Mathews, McCarthy, Sesler, Andranian Noes: None Absent: None Abstained: None PLANNING COMM/SS/ON ATTACHMENT 8 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 10, 2016 ITEM NUMBER:,[�O_ ii SUBJECT: INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, REZONE R-15-01, AND PLANNING APPLICATION PA -15-30, FOR A SELF -STORAGE FACILITY AND RETAIL BUILDING AT 375 BRISTOL STREET DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 FROM: PLANNING DIVISION/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION BY: MEL LEE, SENIOR PLANNER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MEL LEE, AICP (719) 754-5611 mel.lee@costamesaca.gov DESCRIPTION The proposed project involves the following: 1. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND): This document analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Significant environmental impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance. 2. Rezone R-15-01: An ordinance to rezone a 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District). 3. Planning Application PA -15-30: Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the partial demolition of the existing automotive center (Bristol Autoplex) and the development of a mini -storage facility and to retain 12,500 square feet of the existing retail building. No code deviations are requested. NOTE: The project as originally presented to the Planning Commission on June 13, 2016, was demolition of the entire Bristol Autoplex center in order to construct a 774 - unit mini -storage facility and 5,000 square foot food court building, which was recommended for denial by the City Council. In response to the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial, the applicant has redesigned the project as discussed in this report. APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT The applicant/authorized agent is Annette Wiley, representing the property owner, Sanderson J. Ray Development. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATIONS Recommend that the City Council: (1) Adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; (2) Give first reading to Rezone Ordinance for R-16-05: and (3) Approve Planning Application PA -15-30 by adopting a resolution to approve the project, subject to conditions of approval. Wl — PLANNING APPLICATION SUMMARY (ORIGINAL PROJECT -DENIED BY COMMISSION) Location: 375 Bristol Street Application R-15-01 and PA -15-30 Request: 774 -unit mini -storage facility and 5,000 square foot food court building SUBJECT PROPERTY: SURROUNDING PROPERTY: Zone: PDC (Exist.); C2 (Prop.) North: General Plan: General Commercial South (Acr. Bristol St.), 55 and 73 Freeways Santa Ana Delhi Channel and Residences (City of Newport Beach) Lot Dimensions: Irregular East: Golf Course (City of Newport Beach) Lot Area: 138,487 SF (3.18 AC) West: PDC, Hotel and Shopping Center Existing Development: Bristol Street Autoplex (Portion To Be Demolished) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD COMPARISON Development Standard Required/Allowed Proposed/Provided Lot Size: Lot Width 120 FT 560 FT Lot Area 12,000 SF Min. 138,487 SF 3.18 AC Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .75 (103,865 SF Max.) (98,800 SF) - Self -Storage (6,200 SF) - Food Court and Office .76 105,000 SF Total No. of Stories/Building Height 2 Stories/30 FT Food Court and Office: 1 Story/21 FT Self -Storage Building: 2 Stories/21 FT 30 FT to Top of Elevators Interior Landscaping 1,575 SF 2,337.5 SF Setbacks (Buildings) Front 20 FT 25 FT to Food Court Building 68 FT to Self -Storage Building Side (left/right 15 FT/0 FT 31 FT/ 35 FT Rear 0 FT 29 FT Parkin Standard 59 60 Handicap 4 4 TOTAL 63 Spaces 64 Spaces NA = Not Applicable or No Requirement CEQA Status Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final Action City Council PLANNING APPLICATION SUMMARY (REVISED PROJECT) Location: 375 Bristol Street Application R-15-01 and PA -15-30 Request: 719 -unit mini -storage facility and 12,500 SF Retail Building To Remain) SUBJECT PROPERTY: SURROUNDING PROPERTY: Zone: PDC (Exist.); C2 (Prop.) North: (Acr. Bristol St.), 55 and 73 Freeways General Plan: General Commercial South: Santa Ana Delhi Channel and Residences 12,000 SF Min. 138,487 SF 3.18 AC) (City of Newport Beach) Lot Dimensions: Irregular East: Golf Course (City of Newport Beach) Lot Area: 138,487 SF (3.18 AC) West: PDC, Hotel and Shopping Center Existing Development: Bristol Street Autoplex (Portion To Be Demolished) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD COMPARISON Development Standard Required/Allowed Proposed/Provided Lot Size: Lot Width 120 FT 560 FT Lot Area 12,000 SF Min. 138,487 SF 3.18 AC) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .75 (103,865 SF Max.) (90,910 SF) - Self -Storage (12,500 SF) — Retail Building (To Remain) .75 103,410 SF Total) No. of Stories/Building Height 2 Stories/30 FT Retail Building (To Remain): 1 Story/20.5 FT Self -Storage Building: 2 Stories/28.5 FT Interior Landscaping 2,325 SF 2,337.5 SF Setbacks (Buildings) Front 20 FT 68 FT Side (left/right 15 FT/O FT 31 FTI 35 FT Rear 0 FT 29 FT Parkin Standard 82 89 Handicap 4 4 TOTAL 86 Spaces 93 Spaces NA = Not Applicable or No Requirement CEQA Status Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Final Action City Council -1�2- BACKGROUND Project Site/Environs The project site is located in the eastern portion of City of Costa Mesa. The site is located at the southern end of Bristol Street, west of Campus Drive, where the road splits into a frontage road along SR -73 at 375 Bristol Street. A shopping center and the Ayers Hotel abuts the site to the west, and a golf course (in the City of Newport Beach) abuts the site to the east. The 55 -foot -wide concrete Santa Ana Delhi Channel borders the site to the south. The subject site is 138,487 square feet in size (3.18 Acres) and is currently developed with an automotive center (Bristol Street Autoplex) constructed in the late 1980's. The automotive center is 37,883 square feet in size and consists of three buildings with multiple tenants and a surface parking lot. The property is currently zoned PDC (Planned Development Commercial) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Commercial. June 13, 2016 Planning Commission Hearing On June 13, 2016, the Planning Commission considered the original project. During the hearing, 17 persons spoke in opposition to the request, the majority of whom were existing tenants of the Bristol Street Autoplex. Based on the testimony presented by the tenants at the hearing, the Commission recommended denial of the original project on by a 4-1 vote (Chair Dickson voting no). In response to the Commission's recommendation for denial, the applicant has revised the project reducing the number of self -storage units from 774 to 719 and retaining 12,500 square feet of the existing retail center for some of the existing tenants. ANALYSIS Zone Change A rezone (or change) of the zoning classification of the 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District) is proposed. The proposed rezone would be compatible with the existing General Commercial General Plan designation for the project site. The Zoning Code requires that a finding be made as to whether or not the rezone is consistent with the Zoning Code and General Plan. Self -Storage Use If the project is approved, the hours of operation for the self -storage leasing office will be Monday through Saturday, 8:00 am to 6:00 pm, and Sunday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Customers of the self -storage facility shall have access to the storage units via a key pad entry gates system between the hours of 7:00 am to 8:00 pm, seven days a week. The leasing office manager will not reside overnight at the facility. —1S3— Retention of 12,500 Square Feet of the Existing Retail Center In response to the testimony presented at the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant has revised the project to retain approximately 12,500 square feet of existing retail space, including the sushi and sandwich restaurants (4,000 square feet combined) and relocating other auto -related tenants to the remaining available area of approximately 8,770 square feet. As noted in the Zoning Code summary on the previous pages, no code deviations are being requested for the revised project. "Green" Design Features The proposed project includes energy efficient features and design elements aimed at reducing energy consumption to net zero and reducing water use. These features and elements include: • Cool roofs that avoid heat gain; • Naturally ventilated building; • Rooftop solar panels; • Energy efficient lighting, including low-energy light -emitting diode (LED) lighting and daylighting; • Use of sustainable materials with recycled content; • Native, drought -tolerant landscaping; • Vegetated swales, pervious pavement for stormwater capture, filtration; and • Urban gardens. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE The proposed project would be in conformance with the following planning documents: • General Plan • Zoning Code Conformance with the City of Costa Mesa General Plan The Costa Mesa General Plan establishes the long-range planning and policy direction that guides change and preserves the qualities that define the community. The 2015- 2035 General Plan sets forth the vision for Costa Mesa for the next two decades. This vision recognizes that Costa Mesa's focus remains on protecting and enhancing Costa Mesa's diverse residential neighborhoods, accommodating an array of businesses that both serve local needs and attract regional and international spending, and continuing to provide cultural, educational, social, and recreational amenities that contribute to the quality of life in the community. Over the long term, General Plan implementation will ensure that development decisions and improvements to public and private infrastructure are consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies contained in this Plan. The following analysis evaluates the proposed project's consistency with specific goals, and objectives of the General Plan, Land Use Element. • General Plan Objective LU -1A: Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level no greater than can be supported by the infrastructure. Consistency: The project would provide a self -storage facility under the title and design features of a "mini -warehouse" with the retention of a portion of the existing retail building that is designated for general commercial uses. The project would add to the commercial character of the community and meet the competing demands for alternative development. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan objective. • General Plan Policy LU -1.1: Provide for the development of a mix and balance of housing opportunities, commercial goods and services, and employment opportunities in consideration of the needs of the business and residential segment of the community. Consistency: The project would develop a profitable self -storage facility and retail building and would provide local employment opportunities. The proposed project would strengthen the City's economic base. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan policy. • General Plan Policy LU -3.6: Facilitate revitalization of aging commercial centers by working with property owners, developers, local businesses, and other community organizations to coordinate efforts. Consistency: The project would redevelop a portion of the existing Autoplex Center, built in the late 1980's, with a self -storage facility. The project would enhance the site's visual appearance through the use of landscaping to soften the visual impact of the storage facility. The proposed project would include the use of materials and colors that create visual interest as outlined in City policies related to aesthetics. The project's design would reflect that of similar project recently constructed in the area. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan policy. • General Plan Objective LU -4: Encourage new development and redevelopment that protects and improves the quality of Costa Mesa's natural environment and resources. Consistency: The proposed project includes the redevelopment of a site that currently has an automotive mall. Implementation of the proposed project would reduce stormwater runoff by improving on-site hydrology. The building would be designed with energy saving components including solar panels and low-energy lighting. Conformance with the Zoning Code The proposed project complies with the development standards for the C2 zone, including setbacks, building heights, and on-site parking. -- I g5 Per CMMC Title 13, Chapter IX, Special Land Use Regulations, Article 7, mini - warehouses have the following use restrictions: 1. No facility shall be used for: a. Any business activity (other than rental of storage units) including miscellaneous or garage sales, and transfer/storage businesses which utilize vehicles as part of the business; or b. Servicing or repair of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers, or any similar equipment. 2. All rental contracts shall include clauses prohibiting: a. The storage of flammable liquids, highly combustible or explosive materials, or hazardous chemicals; and b. The use of the property for uses other than storage. 3. A resident manager shall be required on the site and shall be responsible for maintaining the operation of the facility in conformance with the conditions of approval and all applicable ordinances. This requirement may be waived by the final review authority, if alternative security measures are found acceptable. Instead of a resident manager as required above, the applicant is proposing security cameras and alarms, inside and outside, with monitors in the manager's office and an internet-based feed to the owner's offices and cell phones for 24/7 surveillance. Justifications for Approval Pursuant to Title 13, Section 13-29(g), Findings, of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, the Planning Commission shall find that the evidence presented in the administrative record substantially meets specified findings. Staff recommends approval of the proposed project, based on an assessment of facts and findings below which are also described in more detail in the draft approval resolution. Rezone • The proposed rezone is required to allow for a self -storage facility on the property, while meeting the development standards of the C2 zone; the proposal is therefore consistent with the Zoning Code and the General Plan. • A self -storage facility is a prohibited use in the current PDC zone. A comparable zoning classification is the General Business District/C2 zone. A rezone is necessary to allow the proposed self -storage facility subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The proposed project meets or exceeds the intent of the City's Zoning Code with regard to the development standards for the C2 zone, including lot size, building setbacks, building height, and on-site parking. The General Plan land use designation for the project area is General Commercial, which is compatible with the proposed zone change to C2. • The proiect will generate less traffic in the form of average daily trips (ADT) compared to the existing commercial center (1,228 ADT existing; 709 ADT proposed). The previous project was estimated to generate approximately 886 trips per day, but after removing the traffic volumes associated with the existing uses (1,228 daily trips), the previous project was found to reduce the existing total daily trips from the site. The analysis found that during the morning peak hour the previous project would increase traffic by 8 peak trips. Under the revised project, new retail (food services) would not be included on the project site. The project would retain a few of the existing establishments on the project site (some of which includes food services). In addition, the revised project would also include fewer storage units. The revised project would generate approximately 709 daily trips (proposed and existing uses to remain onsite), but after removing the traffic volumes associated with the existing uses (1,228 daily trips), fewer daily trips would occur under the revised project compared to the previous project. In addition, the revised project would result in a decrease in the morning and evening peak hour trips compared to the previous project. • The revised project is consistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport, as determined by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) on July 21, 2016. The Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) is the comprehensive land use plan adopted and administered by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County, as required by Section 21675 of the California Public Utilities Code. The proposed project is located less than a quarter -mile southwest of JWA, and thus is within the Airport Planning Area of JWA according to the ALUC. Land uses within the planning area boundaries of the AELUP must conform to the noise, safety and height restriction standards. The mitigation measures stipulated in Exhibit C of the Planning Commission resolution will be required to ensure that the interior noise standards for all buildings comply with the standards in the City's Noise Ordinance. The proposed buildings would not exceed 30 feet in height and will be compatible with the AELUP height restrictions. The project includes rooftop -mounted photovoltaic modules with anti -reflective coating. The photovoltaic modules are not anticipated to create a new source of substantial reflective glare. Furthermore, as required for any project within the approach/departure corridor, the FAA's final approval would be required to ensure no glare or interference with aviation operations would occur. The FAA's 7460 Determination and the glare analysis is required to be approved prior to issuance of building permits for the new structures. On July 21, 2016 the ALUC determined, by unanimous vote, that the project, as revised, was consistent with the AELUP. Proposed Development/Conditional Use Permit The proiect exhibits excellence in design, site planning, integration of uses and structures, and protect the integrity of neighboring development. The project will provide an infill development that will be complementary to an urban setting. The proposed architecture and site design will enhance the street view and will be compatible with existing development in the area. The overall architectural design promotes excellence and compatibility. The variety of building elevations, materials and staggered massing diminishes the boxy design appearance. Igq- A condition of approval requires that building materials shall not be modified unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Director as consistent with the architectural design and features of the proposed development. The proposed storage facility is compliant with the development standards for the C2 zone. The project meets or exceeds the minimum development standards required by Code with regard to parking, building height, and setbacks. Additional conditions of approval ensure compatibility with the existing community over the long-term. A condition of approval has been incorporated requiring the project to comply with the .75 maximum FAR as required by Code. • New landscaping alonq Bristol Street will beautify the streetscape. The attached landscape plan, which is preliminary at this point, includes new water -efficient landscaping on the subject site. Staff has included, as a condition of approval, that landscaping be subject to final approval by the Planning Division. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the IS/MND was originally made available for a 30 -day public review and comment period from May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016. The IS/MND found that the environmental effects from the project would be less than significant with the incorporation of standard conditions of approval and mitigation measures (see Exhibit C of the Planning Commission resolution). A copy of the IS/MND prepared for the original project is included with this report under separate cover. A supplemental letter reflecting the revised project this attached to this report, concluding that the revised project would result in no new significant environmental effects that were evaluated under the original IS/MND. PUBLIC NOTICE Pursuant to Title 13, Section 13-29(d), of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, three types of public notification have been completed no less than 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing: 1. Mailed notice. A public notice was mailed to all property owners within a 500 - foot radius of the project site. The required notice radius is measured from the external boundaries of the property. (See attached Notification Radius Map). NOTE: Notices were also mailed to the existing retail center tenants. 2. On-site posting. A public notice was posted on each street frontage of the project site. 3. Newspaper publication. A public notice was published once in the Daily Pilot newspaper. FISCAL REVIEW Fiscal review is not required for this item. --13 , LEGAL REVIEW The City Attorney has reviewed the draft ordinance and resolutions and they have been approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office. ALTERNATIVES 1. Recommend approval of the project with modifications. The Planning Commission may suggest specific changes that are necessary to alleviate concerns. If any of the additional requested changes are substantial, the item should be continued to a future meeting to allow a redesign or additional analysis. In the event of significant modifications to the proposal, should the Planning Commission choose to do so, staff will return with a revised resolution incorporating new findings and/or conditions. 2. Recommend Denial of the proiect. If the Planning Commission believes that there are insufficient facts to support the findings for approval, Planning Commission must recommend denial the application and provide facts in support of denial to be included in the attached draft resolution for denial. CONCLUSION The revised project satisfies the required findings for the proposed rezone and conditional use permit and is deemed to be a high-quality development, therefore it is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Zoning Code. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the project. OCA/l MEL LEE, AICP J EVI O, AICP Senior Planner I nte)4m Economic Development and Development Services Director Attachments: 1. cation Map, Zoning Map, and 500' Radius 2. Site PSQkos 3. Applicant's vised Project De ' on 4. Draft Ordinance, olution nd Exhibits 5. Correspondence Fro lic 6. Plans (Original a evised) 7. June 13, 20 lanning Commission eting Minutes 8. June , 016 Planning Commission Reso ' (Denial) 9. I ' ' I Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Supp ntal Letter . Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Under Sep e Cover) cc: Annette Wiley, FAIA 220 Newport Center Drive, #11-166 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Sanderson J. Ray Development 2699 White Road #150 Irvine, CA 92614 '191- Arabesque Said-Abdelwahed Senior Associate ESA I Environmental Science Associates 2121 Alton Parkway, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92606 I 0 RESOLUTION NO. PC -16-54 ATTACHMENT 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS: (1) ADOPT THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, (2) APPROVE AND GIVE FIRST READING TO REZONE R-15-01 FOR A REZONE OF THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.18 -ACRE DEVELOPMENT SITE FROM PDC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL) TO C2 (GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT), AND (3) APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION PA -15-30 FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TWO-STORY, 719 -UNIT MINI -STORAGE FACILITY AND 12,500 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING AT 375 BRISTOL STREET. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, an application was filed by Annette Wiley, representing the property owner, Sanderson J. Ray Development, requesting approval of the following: 1. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND): This document analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Significant environmental impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance. 2. Rezone R-15-01: An ordinance to rezone a 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District). 3. Planning Application PA -15-30: Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the partial demolition of the existing automotive center (Bristol Autoplex) and the development of a mini -storage facility and to retain 12,500 square feet of the existing retail building. No code deviations are requested. WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2016 with all persons having the opportunity to speak and be heard for and against the proposal. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed all environmental documents comprising the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and has found that the Initial Study/Negative Declaration considers all environmental impacts of the proposed project and a reasonable range of alternatives, and the Initial Study/Negative Declaration is complete, adequate, and fully complies with all requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Costa Mesa Environmental Guidelines. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the IS/MND was originally made R_ available for a 30 -day public review and comment period from May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016. WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project reflects the independent judgment of the City of Costa Mesa. BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record and the findings contained in Exhibit A, the conditions of approval contained within Exhibit B, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program contained in Exhibit C, respectively, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council: (1) Adopts the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, (2) Approve and give first reading to Rezone R- 15-01, and (3) Approve Planning Application PA -15-30. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Costa Mesa Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon the activity as described in the staff report for Planning Application PA -15-30 and upon the applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions in Exhibit B and Mitigation Measures in Exhibit C, and compliance of all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Any approval granted by this resolution shall be subject to review, modification or revocation if there is a material change that occurs in the operation, or if the applicant fails to comply with any of the conditions of approval and/or mitigation measures. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if any section, division, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this resolution, or the documents in the record in support of this resolution, are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of October, 2016. Robert L. Dickson Jr., Choir Costa Mesa Planning Commission Iq'2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, Jay Trevino, Acting Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Costa Mesa, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City of Costa Mesa Planning Commission held on October 10, 2016 by the following votes: AYES: Dickson, Mathews, McCarthy, Sesler, Andranian NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Jay lVevino, Acting Secretary Costa Mesa Planning Commission -1G3-o EXHIBIT A FINDINGS (APPROVAL) A. Required Finding: The proposed rezone is consistent with the Zoning Code and the General Plan. Facts In Support of Findings: The proposed project meets or exceeds the intent of the City's Zoning Code with regard to the development standards for the C2 zone, including lot size, building setbacks, building height, and onsite parking. The General Plan land use designation for the project area is General Commercial, which is compatible with the proposed zone change to C2 (General Business District). B. The proposed project complies with Title 13, Section 13-29(g)(5), Conditional Use Permit, of the Municipal Code due to the following: Finding: The proposed use is substantially compatible with uses in the same general area and would not be materially detrimental to other properties within the area. Facts in Support of Findings: The proposed use, with the recommended conditions of approval, will be compatible with the other uses in the immediate vicinity. Compliance with the conditions of approval will allow this use to operate with minimal impact on surrounding properties and uses. Finding: Granting the use will not be materially detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public or otherwise injurious to property or improvements within the immediate neighborhood. Facts in Support of Findings: The use is consistent with the C2 zoning of the property and, as conditioned, compatible with the properties in the vicinity. Compliance with the applicable Building and Fire Safety Codes will ensure that the use is not materially detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public or otherwise injurious to property or improvements within the immediate neighborhood. Finding: Granting the conditional use permit will not allow a use, density or intensity which is not in accordance with the general plan designation for the property. Facts in Support of Findings: The property has a General Plan Designation of General Commercial. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the applicable provisions of the General Plan Designation. The request, as conditioned, is consistent with the following goals and objectives of the General Plan. • The project exhibits excellence in design site planninq integration of uses and structures, and protect the integrity of neighboring development. The project will provide an infill development that will be complementary to an urban setting. The proposed architecture and site design will enhance the street view and will be compatible with existing development in the area. The overall architectural design promotes excellence and compatibility. The variety of building elevations, -1G-4-- materials and staggered massing diminishes the boxy design appearance. A condition of approval requires that enhancements to the rear and side elevations shall include enhanced detailing including articulation, projections and use of varied building materials, and shall not be modified unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Director as consistent with the architectural design and features of the proposed development. • The proposal does not require any deviations from the code requirements for the C2 zone. The project meets or exceeds the minimum development standards required by Code with regard to parking, building height, and setbacks. Additional conditions of approval ensure compatibility with the existing community over the long-term. • New landscaping along Bristol Street will beautify the streetscape. The attached landscape plan, which is preliminary at this point, includes new water -efficient landscaping on the subject site. Staff has included, as a condition of approval, that landscaping be subject to final approval by the Planning Division. • The proiect will generate less traffic in the form of average daily trips (ADT) compared to the existing commercial center (1,228 ADT existing; 709 ADT proposed). The previous project was estimated to generate approximately 886 trips per day, but after removing the traffic volumes associated with the existing uses (1,228 daily trips), the previous project was found to reduce the existing total daily trips from the site. The analysis found that during the morning peak hour the previous project would increase traffic by 8 peak trips. Under the revised project, new retail (food services) would not be included on the project site. The project would retain a few of the existing establishments on the project site (some of which includes food services). In addition, the revised project would also include fewer storage units. The revised project would generate approximately 709 daily trips (proposed and existing uses to remain onsite), but after removing the traffic volumes associated with the existing uses (1,228 daily trips), fewer daily trips would occur under the revised project compared to the previous project. In addition, the revised project would result in a decrease in the morning and evening peak hour trips compared to the previous project. • The revised project is consistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport, as determined by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) on July 21, 2016. The Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) is the comprehensive land use plan adopted and administered by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County, as required by Section 21675 of the California Public Utilities Code. The proposed project is located less than a quarter -mile southwest of JWA, and thus is within the Airport Planning Area of JWA according to the ALUC. Land uses within the planning area boundaries of the AELUP must conform to the noise, safety and height restriction standards. The mitigation measures stipulated in Exhibit C of the Planning Commission resolution will be required to ensure that the interior noise standards for all buildings comply with the standards in the City's Noise Ordinance. The proposed buildings would not exceed 30 feet in height and will be compatible with the AELUP height restrictions. - IGS The project includes 360 rooftop -mounted photovoltaic modules with anti - reflective coating. The photovoltaic modules are not anticipated to create a new source of substantial reflective glare. Furthermore, as required for any project within the approach/departure corridor, the FAA's final approval would be required to ensure no glare or interference with aviation operations would occur. The FAA's 7460 Determination and the glare analysis is required to be approved prior to issuance of building permits for the new structures. On July 21, 2016 the ALUC determined, by unanimous vote, that the project, as revised, was consistent with the AELUP. The following describes the proposed project's consistency with specific goals and objectives of the 2015-2035 General Plan. • General Plan Objective LU -1A: Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level no greater than can be supported by the infrastructure. Consistency: The project would provide a self -storage facility under the title and design features of a "mini -warehouse" with the retention of a portion of the existing retail building that is designated for general commercial uses. The project would add to the commercial character of the community and meet the competing demands for alternative development. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan objective. • General Plan Policy LU -1.1: Provide for the development of a mix and balance of housing opportunities, commercial goods and services, and employment opportunities in consideration of the needs of the business and residential segment of the community. Consistency: The project would develop a profitable self -storage facility and retail building and would provide local employment opportunities. The proposed project would strengthen the City's economic base. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan policy. • General Plan Policy LU -3.6: Facilitate revitalization of aging commercial centers by working with property owners, developers, local businesses, and other community organizations to coordinate efforts. Consistency: The project would redevelop a portion of the existing Autoplex Center, built in the late 1980's, with a self -storage facility. The project would enhance the site's visual appearance through the use of landscaping to soften the visual impact of the storage facility. The proposed project would include the use of materials and colors that create visual interest as outlined in City policies related to aesthetics. The project's design would reflect that of similar project recently constructed in the area. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General Plan policy. • General Plan Objective LU -4: Encourage new development and redevelopment that protects and improves the quality of Costa Mesa's natural environment and resources. Consistency: The proposed project includes the redevelopment of a site that currently has an automotive mall. Implementation of the proposed project would reduce stormwater runoff by improving on-site hydrology. The building would be designed with energy saving components including solar panels and low-energy lighting. C. The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental procedures. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If any of these conditions are removed, the decision-making body must make a finding that the project will not result in significant environmental impacts, that the conditions are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency, or that specific economic, social or other considerations make the mitigation measures infeasible. D. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with Chapter XII, Article 3, Transportation System Management, of Title 13 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code in that the development project's traffic impacts will be mitigated at all affected intersections and by the payment of traffic impact fees. - Iqq EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Ping. 1. The use shall be limited to the type of operation described in this staff report. Any change in the operational characteristics shall require review by the Planning Division and may require an amendment to the master plan, subject to either Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission approval, depending on the nature of the proposed change. The applicant is reminded that Code allows the Planning Commission to modify or revoke any planning application based on findings related to public nuisance and/or noncompliance with conditions of approval [Title 13, Section 13-29(0)]. 2. The mitigation measures of the negative declaration have been included as Exhibit C. If any of these mitigation measures are removed, the decision-making body must make a finding that the project will still not result in significant environmental impacts and that the mitigated negative declaration is still valid. 3. The project shall comply with the .75 maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) as required by Code. 4. The hours of operation for the leasing office shall be Monday through Saturday, 8:00 am to 6:00 pm, and Sunday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Customers of the self -storage facility shall have access to the storage units via a key pad entry gates system between the hours of 7:00 am to 8:00 pm, seven days a week. The leasing office manager shall not reside overnight at the facility. 5. Instead of a live-in manager, the applicant shall provide security cameras and alarms, inside and outside, with monitors in the manager's office and an internet-based feed to the owner's offices and cell phones for 24/7 surveillance. 6. The conditions of approval, code requirements, and special district requirements of PA -15-30 shall be blueprinted on the face of the site plan as part of the plan check submittal package. 7. A decorative wrought iron fence shall be built to replace the chain link fence abutting the golf course to the east, prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy, unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Director. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, a final landscape plan indicating the landscape palette and the design/material of paved areas shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with the approved plans prior to final inspection or occupancy clearance. 10. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall contact the U.S. Postal Service with regard to location and design of mail delivery facilities. Such facilities shall be shown on the site plan, landscape plan, and/or floor plan. 11. If the project is constructed in phases, the perimeter wall, landscaping along the frontages, and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of M_ utilities for the first phase. 12. No modification(s) of the approved building elevations including, but not limited to, change of architectural type, changes that increase the building height, removal of building articulation, or a change of the finish material(s), shall be made during construction without prior Planning Division written approval. Specifically, elevations shall not be modified unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Director as consistent with the architectural design and features of the proposed development. Failure to obtain prior Planning Division approval of the modification could result in the requirement of the applicant to (re)process the modification through a discretionary review process or a variance, or in the requirement to modify the construction to reflect the approved plans. 13. Prior to issuance of grading permits, developer shall submit for review and approval a Construction Management Plan. This plan features methods to minimize disruption to the neighboring residential uses to the fullest extent that is reasonable and practicable. The plan shall include construction parking and vehicle access and specifying staging areas and delivery and hauling truck routes. The plan should mitigate disruption to residents during construction. The truck route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas and major truck traffic during peak hours. The total truck trips to the site shall not exceed 200 trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus 100 truck trips from the site) unless approved by the Development Services Director or Transportation Services Manager. 14. The subject property's ultimate finished grade level may not be filled/raised in excess of 36 inches above the finished grade of any abutting property. If additional fill dirt is needed to provide acceptable on-site storm water flow to a public street, an alternative means of accommodating that drainage shall be approved by the City's Building Official prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. Such alternatives may include subsurface tie-in to public storm water facilities, subsurface drainage collection systems and/or sumps with mechanical pump discharge in -lieu of gravity flow. If mechanical pump method is determined appropriate, said mechanical pump(s) shall continuously be maintained in working order. In any case, development of subject property shall preserve or improve the existing pattern of drainage on abutting properties. 15. The applicant shall contact the Planning Division to arrange a Planning inspection of the site prior to the release of occupancy/utilities. This inspection is to confirm that the conditions of approval and code requirements have been satisfied. 16. The project includes rooftop -mounted photovoltaic modules with anti - reflective coating. Final review and approval by the FAA shall be required to ensure no glare or interference with aviation operations occur. The FAA's 7460 Determination and the glare analysis shall be required prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Trash facilities shall be screened from view, and designed and located appropriately to minimize potential noise and odor impacts. - i GG - 18. Transformers, backflow preventers, and any other approved above- ground utility improvement shall be located outside of the required street setback area and shall be screened from view, under direction of Planning staff. Any deviation from this requirement shall be subject to review and approval of the Development Services Director. 19. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the Applicant shall submit a Lighting Plan and Photometric Study for the approval of the City's Development Services Department. The Lighting Plan shall demonstrate compliance with the following: a. The mounting height of lights on light standards shall not exceed 18 feet in any location on the Project site unless approved by the Development Services Director. b. The intensity and location of lights on buildings shall be subject to the Development Services Director's approval. c. All site lighting fixtures shall be provided with a flat glass lens. Photometric calculations shall indicate the effect of the flat glass lens fixture efficiency. d. Lighting design and layout shall limit spill light to no more than 0.5 foot candle at the property line of the surrounding neighbors, consistent with the level of lighting that is deemed necessary for safety and security purposes on site. e. Glare shields may be required for select light standards 20. All construction contractors shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulations, including Rule 403, Fugitive Dust. All grading (regardless of acreage) shall apply best available control measures for fugitive dust in accordance with Rule 403. To ensure that the project is in full compliance with applicable SCAQMD dust regulations and that there is no nuisance impact off the site, the contractor would implement each of the following: a. Moisten soil not more than 15 minutes prior to moving soil or conduct whatever watering is necessary to prevent visible dust emissions from exceeding 100 feet in any direction. b. Apply chemical stabilizers to disturbed surface areas (completed grading areas) within five days of completing grading or apply dust suppressants or vegetation sufficient to maintain a stabilized surface. c. Water excavated soil piles hourly or covered with temporary coverings. d. Water exposed surfaces at least twice a day under calm conditions. Water as often as needed on windy days when winds are less than 25 miles per day or during very dry weather in order to maintain a surface crust and prevent the release of visible emissions from the construction site. e. Wash mud -covered tired and under -carriages of trucks leaving construction sites. - 2Q - f. Provide for street sweeping, as needed, on adjacent roadways to remove dirt dropped by construction vehicles or mud, which would otherwise be carried off by trucks departing project sites. g. Securely cover loads with a tight fitting tarp on any truck leaving the construction sites to dispose of debris. h. Cease grading during period when winds exceed 25 miles per hour 21. All rubber tired dozers and graders used during the grading phase of construction shall be powered by Tier 3 engines. 22. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. 23. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, agents, officers and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding (collectively referred to as "proceeding") brought against the City, its elected and appointed officials, agents, officers or employees arising out of, or which are in any way related to, the applicant's project, or any approvals granted by City related to the applicant's project. The indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorney's fees, and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by the applicant, the City and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. This indemnity provision shall include the applicant's obligation to indemnify the City for all the City's costs, fees, and damages that the City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this section. City shall have the right to choose its own legal counsel to represent the City's interests, and applicant shall indemnify City for all such costs incurred by City. Eng. 24. Maintain the public right-of-way in a "wet -down" condition to prevent excessive dust and promptly remove any spillage from the public right-of- way by sweeping or sprinkling. CODE REQUIREMENTS The following list of federal, state and local laws applicable to the project has been compiled by staff for the applicant's reference. Any reference to "City" pertains to the City of Costa Mesa. 2cA Ping. 1. All contractors and subcontractors must have valid business licenses to do business in the City of Costa Mesa. Final inspections, final occupancy and utility releases will not be granted until all such licenses have been obtained. 2. Address assignment shall be requested from the Planning Division prior to submittal of working drawings for plan check. The approved address of individual units, suites, buildings, etc., shall be blueprinted on the site plan and on all floor plans in the working drawings. 3. All applicable provisions of CMMC Section 13-171 (Development Standards for Mini -Warehouses) shall be complied with. 4. Grading materials delivery, equipment operation, and other construction -related activity shall be limited to be-tween the hours of 7 a.m. and 8 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturday. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. Exceptions may be made for activities that will not generate noise audible from off- site, such as painting and other quiet interior work. 5. Two (2) sets of detailed landscape and irrigation plans, which meet the requirements set forth in Costa Mesa Municipal Code Sections 13-101 through 13-108 and the City's Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines, shall be required as part of the project plan check review and approval process. Plans shall be forwarded to the Planning Division for final approval prior to issuance of building permits. 6. Two (2) sets of landscape and irrigation plans, approved by the Planning Division, shall be attached to two of the final building plan sets. 7. All on-site utility services shall be installed underground. 8. Installation of all utility meters shall be performed in a manner so as to obscure the installation from view from any place on or off the property. The installation shall be in a manner acceptable to the public utility and shall be in the form of a vault, wall cabinet, or wall box under the direction of the Planning Division. 9. Any mechanical equipment such as air-conditioning equipment and duct work shall be screened from view in a manner approved by the Planning Division. Bldg. 10. Comply with the requirements of the 2013 California Building Code, 2013 California Residential Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, 2013 California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Plumbing Code, 2013 California Green Building Standards Code and 2013 California Energy Code (or the applicable adopted, California Building Code, California Residential Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Green Building Standards, and California Energy Code at the time of plan submittal or permit issuance) and California Code of Regulations also known as the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the City of Costa Mesa. Requirements for accessibility to sites, facilities, buildings, and elements by individuals with disability shall comply with Chapter 11 B of the 2013 California Building Code. — 2D2— 11. The applicant shall provide the following: a. Accessibility shall be to and through the front door and to the commercial space from the public sidewalk. b. Accessible restroo m s/bath rooms shall be provided in the commercial space. c. Accessible parking shall be provided. d. Accessible entry door, ramps, landings, sidewalks, hallways, strike edge clearances, and elevation changes shall be provided. e. Additional access requirements may be required per 2013 California Building Code. 12. Provide a plan to the County of Orange Health Dept. for review and approval. 13. Submit a precise grading plan, an erosion control plan and a hydrology study. If it is determined that a grading plan is not required, a drainage plan shall be provided. 14. Submit a soils report for this project. Soils report recommendations shall be blueprinted on both the architectural and grading plans. 15. The ground adjacent immediately to the foundation shall be slopes away from the building at a slope of not less than 5% for a minimum distance of 10 feet measured perpendicular to the face of the wall CBC sec. 1804.3. See also exception. 16. On graded sites the top of exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved discharge devise a minimum of 12 inches plus 2 percent 2013 California Building Code Section 1808.7.4. Trans. 17. Construct all proposed driveway approaches to comply with city standards. 18. Fulfill mitigation of off-site traffic impacts at the time of issuance of occupancy by submitting to the Transportation Services Division the required traffic impact fee pursuant to the prevailing schedule of charges adopted by the City Council. NOTE: The Traffic Impact Fee will be recalculated at the time of issuance of building permit/certificate of occupancy based upon any changes in the prevailing schedule of charges adopted by the City Council and in effect at that time. 19. Fulfill San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Ordinance requirement at the time of issuance of building permit/certificate of occupancy by submitting the required fee to the Planning Division. NOTE: This fee is subject to revision and possible increase effective July 1 of each year. 20. Close unused drive approaches, or portion of, with full height curb and gutter that comply with City Standards. Fire 21. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the City of Costa Mesa Fire Department shall review and approve the project design features to assess compliance with the California Building Code and California Fire Code. WQMP 22. In order to comply with the 2003 DAMP, the proposed project shall prepare a Storm Drain Plan, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) conforming to the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer or Environmental Engineer, which shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 23. The project shall comply with the NPDES requirements, as follows: a. Construction General Permit Notice of Intent (NOI) Design: Prior to the issuance of preliminary or precise grading permits, the project Applicant shall provide the City Engineer with evidence that an NOI has been filed with the Storm Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Such evidence shall consist of a copy of the NOI stamped by the SWRCB or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or a letter from either agency stating that the NOI has been filed. b. Construction Phase Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP): Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall prepare a SWPPP that complies with the Construction General Permit and will include at a minimum the following: • Discuss in detail the BMPs planned for the project related to control of sediment and erosion, non -sediment pollutants, and potential pollutants in non -storm water discharges; • Describe post -construction BMPs for the project; • Explain the maintenance program for the project's BMPs. c. List the parties responsible for the SWPPP implementation and the BMP maintenance during and after grading. The project Applicant shall implement the SWPPP and modify the SWPPP as directed by the Construction General Permit. 24. A WQMP shall be maintained and updated as needed to satisfy the requirements of the adopted NPDES program. The plan shall ensure that the existing water quality measures for all improved phases of the project are adhered to. 25. Location of the BMPs shall not be within the public right-of-way. 26. During demolition, grading, and excavation, workers shall comply with the requirements of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 1529, which provides for exposure limits, exposure monitoring, respiratory protection, and good working practices by workers exposed to asbestos. Asbestos -contaminated debris and other wastes shall be managed and disposed of in accordance with the applicable provision of the California Health and Safety Code. 27. During demolition, grading, and excavation, workers shall comply with the requirements of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 1532.1, which provides for exposure limits, exposure monitoring, — Z,r-4,— respiratory protection, and good working practice by workers exposed to lead. Lead -contaminated debris and other wastes shall be managed and disposed of in accordance with the applicable provision of the California Health and Safety Code. 28. Prior to demolition activities, removal and/or abatement of asbestos containing building materials, lead based paints, and hazardous materials associated with the existing building materials, an investigation shall be conducted by a qualified environmental professional in consultation with the Costa Mesa Fire Department. An asbestos and hazardous materials abatement plan shall be developed by the qualified environmental professional, in order to clearly define the scope and objective of the abatement activities. The Applicant shall conduct demolition consistent with the abatement plan, applicable state requirements and City standard conditions. Eng. 29. At the time of development submit for approval an Offsite Plan to the Engineering Division and Grading Plan to the Building Division that shows Sewer, Water, Existing Parkway Improvements and the limits of work on the site, and hydrology calculations, both prepared by a registered Civil Engineer or Architect. Cross lot drainage shall not occur. Construction Access approval must be obtained prior to Building or Engineering Permits being issued by the City of Costa Mesa. Pay Offsite Plan Check fee per Section 13-231 of the C.C.M.M.C. and an approved Offsite Plan shall be required prior to Engineering Permits being issued by the City of Costa Mesa. 30. A Construction Access Permit and deposit of $730 will be required by City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division prior to start of any on-site work, necessary during construction for street sweeping and to guarantee replacement costs in case of damage to existing public improvements. 31. Obtain a permit from the City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division, at the time of development and then construct P.C.C. commercial sidewalk per City of Costa Mesa Standards as shown on the Offsite Plan, including four (4) feet clear around obstructions in the sidewalk. 32. Obtain a permit from the City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division, at the time of development and then construct P.C.C. driveway approaches per City of Costa Mesa Standards as shown on the Offsite Plan. Location and dimensions are subject to the approval of the Transportation Services Manager. ADA compliance required for all new driveway approaches. 33. Obtain a permit from the City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division, at the time of development and then remove any existing driveways and/or curb depressions that will not be used and replace with full height curb and sidewalk. 34. Fulfill City of Costa Mesa Drainage Ordinance No. 06-19 requirements prior to approval of Final Map. 35. Submit for review a hydrology report and calculations prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. 36. Applicant is informed Bristol Street is under a "NO OPEN CUT" moratorium. Open cutting the street pavement during the moratorium — 20S period shall require special resurfacing requirements. SPECIAL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS The requirements of the following special districts are hereby forwarded to the applicant: Sani. 1. Applicant will be required to construct sewers to serve this project, at his own expense, meeting the approval of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. 2. County Sanitation District fees, fixture fees, inspection fees, and sewer permit are required prior to installation of sewer. 3. Applicant shall submit a plan showing sewer improvements that meets the District Engineer's approval to the Building Division as part of the plans submitted for plan check. 4. The applicant is required to contact the Costa Mesa Sanitary District at (949) 654-8400 to arrange final sign -off prior to certificate of occupancy being released. 5. Applicant shall contact Costa Mesa Sanitary District at (949) 654-8400 for any additional district requirements. AQMD 6. Applicant shall contact the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) at (800) 288-7664 for potential additional conditions of development or for additional permits required by AQMD. Water 7. Customer shall contact the Mesa Water District — Engineering Desk and submit an application and plans for project review. Customer must obtain a letter of approval and a letter of project completion from Mesa Water District. State 8. Comply with the requirements of the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to determine if red imported fire ants (RIFA) exist on the property prior to any soil movement or excavation. Call CDFA at (719) 708-1910 for information. -- Z0(p - CD U C Q E O U w O CD m 0 2 r N M I� N M I-; N M I —4 N M m 0 N r v�. >1 w . U v C cn v Ln O O O Q 01 a0i v U a) c E ` ° w U O Q .S 0 E ° � [ O cnV) 44+ (J G -5;> Q Q . u GU > Q Q d v cnV) Q Q u C 0 •:J c� u CAV) F Q v G r N M I� N M I-; N M I —4 N M m 0 N r v�. >1 w . U v C cn v Ln O O O Q 01 a0i v y y Q }+ O a o 'i cl •a v O O 0 O � O . rs n, [ v4c v Oc v C ��,. [ O p � v 0 2 C3 pA O " o O v U o" �r i .o • y cos 4J .•i av 0 h p v. > y 0:-q x CIS 0 L. L. > Cd o on [u a.5o4q0 0-2 .0q H0 N r v�. ;n v O ��4A -v cl "L3s., U . • . }+ O a o 'i cl •a v O O 0 O � O . rs n, [ v4c v Oc v C ��,. [ O p � v 0 �aUy • .�. Yn C �+ Y aJ 4j, X--0 20'7 - • �a M � W O� �0 az ui C7 a L)1':CD m0g X0 W M J O N �0 H N CC a> U C ca CL 0 U 0 a) m ci w N H a CL •.a �'�' Im aci 0) c E [ c 0 ` o a o c ,o c > > 0Lu cgQQ r N M c m o v c c c m °c. E o� [ U) aQ o E "> _ Q _ o C y -3 ?: C v on v V y O LJ ice. O� y cu 0 r d IUU O Qy 73 yr-, bn u o x-yi o p oo. p � -� [ u •.O. > 1 50 p O 1. N = M � � � . � E'" u ., n C3 -80 Nu O v !~ o v7 ` O O I, G C C c� 'Z'S >, y u O v -o a• v a o 0 ox � 5n a �.S u � 7q y� �.�y acl s cl �ao.o O p — 208 Q OW O� aZ 0 a W U Z O mom XZO LU O Z LLJJ O fn QO m (-)q n U C fC .Q O U O d R z U � c U U U V L Q v v G[ G a C v o v O v v v v y i o C O O �� QQcQCA z r N M m o •� Q w to v v C cn C L E C m C " E Q z v Q t:l �21 �[ OA J oma. o a� a L O �''S 11o ^-cs W H -,.,6 2.�E� C r l n��n� °-oLagoocn3O� CU 'C o0 ny y O V O. O+ 0 L5 ��, clv >q o 11 o °d vv 1 wO 9 L , -x [ ! O -o '[C-9:.aPo J� R. 5°CP.�4v 4"c C c3 Yp v�O pp o, 0-0"3 ❑ �O v p' v o -C L,O 421 Ilu .4 14. z z-vCa� v >CL 73 (-)q n