Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - - Additional Documents - 2/21/2017ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR CC -2 WARRANT INFORMATION (02/21/17) Payment Date Remittance to: Remittance Payment Explanation of payment Ref. ID: Amount 0201987 01/27/17 Chem Mark Inc. - 0000006262 $69.24 Isn't G4S to pay for this? No, the City still Laundry Chemicals — Jail covers the maintenance and operations costs associated to the jail. This includes laundry detergents, cleaning supplies, etc.. The contract we have with G4S is for personnel costs. PH -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ZA-16-34 APPEAL TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Merchant's Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of ZA-16-34, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow two reserved parking spaces ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR PH -2 From: Gregory Tong [mailto:gregrl<ytek@att.net] Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:21 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us>; FOLEY, KATRINA<KATRINA.FOLEY@costamesaca.gov>; GENIS, SANDRA <SAN DRA.GEN IS@costamesaca.gov>; RIGHEIMER, JIM<JIM.RIG HEIMER@costamesaca.gov>; MANSOOR, ALLAN<ALLAN.MANSOOR@costamesaca.gov>; STEPHENS, JOHN <JOHN.STEPHENS@costamesaca.gov> Cc: Chad Alves <chad@watchconnection.com>; Gregory Tong <gregrkytek@att.net> Subject: Merchant's Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of ZA-16-34, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow two reserved parking spaces Ladies and Gentlemen of the City of Costa Mesa City Council, To Whom It May Concern: I have been a customer of the Costa Mesa business, The Watch Connection, since 1999. Over the years I have been fortunate enough to be able to buy more than a dozen of their high-quality watches, a couple of them were five -figures in cost, worth more than my car. I adamantly support The Watch Connection's request for close proximity reserved parking spaces for their customers and product representatives. It is a safety concern of robbery when purchasing an expensive item like a watch, leaving the store and returning to one's vehicle. Common sense suggests prudent safety precautions such as reserved close -proximity parking spaces for this type of business and the merchandise they sell. To cite a similar situation, Weseom Credit Union at Harbor Boulevard and Adams Avenue, has five full-time reserved parking_spaces to address safety and convenience concerns for their customers. 1 am a Wescom member and returning to my car with hundreds of dollars in cash withdrawn from their ATM is always a concern. The question to ask yourself is, would you rather walk to your car that is just outside the store, or would you mind if you had to walk through an open public parking lot with a new thousand dollar watch on your wrist? As their custon7er, I would appreciate the safety of close proximity reserved parking spaces. Grant the Watch Connection the reserved parking spaces they are requesting. Thank you for your time and keep Costa Mesa one of the best run cities in California. Greg Tong Costa Mesa resident since 1978 2556 Greenbriar Lane, Costa Mesa 92626 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Watch Connection (Minor Conditional Use Permit) & Jeweler's Security Alliance Crime Alert ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR PH -2 From: ksj [mailto:ksjesq@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:57 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us>; LOOMIS, RYAN <RYAN.LOOM IS@costamesaca.gov> Cc: marc@watchconnection.com; chad@watchconnection.com Subject: Watch Connection (Minor Conditional Use Permit) & Jeweler's Security Alliance Crime Alert Dear Cost Mesa City Counsel, As you should be aware, the hearing on the Appeal for the Watch Connection Minor CUP Application is tonight, Tuesday, February 21, 2017. In any case, we wanted you to see and be aware of the trade article from the 4th Quarter 2016 below from the Jeweler's Security Alliance, which lends even greater credence to the Watch Connection's main concerns .... safety and security ... for their customers as well as the jewelry sellers/vendors referenced in the article. In addition, there were no public comments received prior to the initial City Planning Commission vote on November 21, 2016, which neither the Planning Commission Chair or Vice -Chair attended nor voted. Much the same, we are not aware that any public comments had been received in opposition to the Minor CUP or against the current Appeal of the Planning Commission prior decision, which remains hotly contested and does not appear to be well-founded. Accordingly, based on the Application submitted, the basis therefore (ie. safety, security, etc.) as well as the landlord's intention to not make this a reoccurring issue (ie. planning on only allowing Watch Connection to submit for a Parking CUP) based on the unique situation involved herein, we don't believe that this will "set a precedence" as the Planning Director seemingly was concerned. Rather, we believe that it would constitute a justifiable and reasonable accommodation within the sound discretion of the City of Cost Mesa and City Council. Moreover, there were several statements contained in the Planning Commission Agenda Report that were intended to support denial of the Application that do not appear to be valid or well-founded. It is also our understanding that the Staff Report was originally written to approve the pending Minor CUP Application. However, it was later modified to actually support denial and it is these supposed points that seem to be inappropriate based on the actual facts and pending situation. With relation thereto, the Planning Commission seemingly believed removing two parking spots from the General Plan will cause customers of the subject center to be further impacted and/or required to park offsite within the surrounding neighborhoods. However, that is not the case and it is important for the City of Costa Mesa and City Council to be aware of the following extenuating circumstances, all of which support granting of the Watch Connection Minor CUP Application: 1. Watch Connection is the longest -standing Tenant by far (37+ years) 2. Watch Connection has the fewest operating hours of any business; 3. Watch Connection has the 2nd largest space in the center (2,700 sq. ft.); 4. Watch Connection is allocated 11 parking spaces based on size of space; 5. CUP only relates to 2 of the 11 allocated parking spaces for Watch Connection; 6. CUP only relates to limited days (5) and hours per day (3) = 15 total hours/week; (Tuesday - Saturday from 11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.) 7. CUP does not involve the peak parking time for the center (7:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.); S. Watch Connection already has a locked/restricted entry into their business; 9. CUP involves important public safety, security and liability concerns; and 10. The City and Planing Commission should be concerned about avoiding liability. Based on the foregoing, the City, the City Council and the Planning Commission need to balance the above interests and concerns with respect to the purpose and intent of the General Plan taking into consideration our evolving society, including social concerns that may not have been present and/or considered when the General Plan was implemented many years ago. However, times have changed and the above facts and circumstances need to be considered and balanced as the neither the City nor the property owner/tenants want any assaults, thefts, armed robberies, injuries or deaths at the subject center. Similarly, the City of Costa Mesa could be held liable if they fail to address this issue and/or take reasonable steps to safeguard their citizens and the public, especially when, as here, they have been affirmatively made aware of the pending concerns and potential harm that could occur, if no action is taken. Accordingly, the pending Minor CUP should be approved as Watch Connection might otherwise be forced to move out of the City (ie. after almost 40 years) resulting in a loss of retail sales and tax revenues for the City of Costa Mesa. As before, we believe the property owner will continue to help regulate this process to ensure the City is not inundated with further requests as this will not set a "precedent" or become a re -occurring event due to the unique nature and location of the subject business. Please contact me if you have any further questions with regard to the Watch Connection Minor CUP Application and we appreciate your fair and favorable consideration of the Application and related Appeal this evening. Thank you. Best Regards, Kelly S. Johnson, Esq. This e-mail, along with attachments, if any, and any replies thereto, are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521 and are legally privileged. This information is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message ----- From: Chad Alves <chadCa)watchconnection.com> To: 'MARC MARTINE' <MARCPWATCHCONNECTION.COM>; 'ksj' <ksjesg(ilaol.com> Sent: Tue, Nov 15, 2016 9:43 am Subject: FW: Jeweler's Security Alliance Crime Alert, 11/14/16 More reason for our variance . Security for our sales reps. Look at this report below on a spike of sales reps being held up.. Many are in California. This should help our case... Thank You, Chad Alves Watch Connection The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail or phone and delete this message and its attachments, if any. From: Jeweler's Security Alliance[mailto:isa2(cbiewelerssecurity.org] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 9:55 AM To: infoCabwatchconnection.com Subject: Jeweler's Security Alliance Crime Alert, 11/14/16 To: Marc Martine ATTACKS SPIKE ON TRAVELING SALESPERSONS AND RETAILERS CARRYING JEWELRY SPECIAL ALERT AND ADVISORY During the first nine months of 2016, robberies and thefts of traveling salespersons and retail jewelers carrying merchandise off -premises averaged two or three a month. However, in October, 2016 such losses soared to eight, and took place in seven different states: WA, KY, GA, NV, TN, CA and FL. Despite a significant drop in attacks on traveling salespersons over the last decade, those carrying jewelry off -premises, including retailers, must still follow carefully the security procedures listed below. The seriousness of such losses cannot be overstated. It should be remembered that a traveling salesperson was killed near Dallas/Fort Worth Airport in June, 2016, and there was a similar robbery attempt on another jeweler near the same airport the previous week. The summary descriptions of the cases below indicate the location and method of the losses which should be reviewed to assist in prevention, such as this recent dramatic case: SALESPERSONS ROBBED WHILE DRIVING ONTO HIGHWAY RAMP SeaTac, WA — October 25, 2016 Two salesperson were driving at noon onto an entrance ramp to a highway when they were cut off by a vehicle, and then struck from behind by another vehicle. Two suspects wearing masks approached the salespersons' vehicle, broke two windows of the car, assaulted the driver, and then reached through the broken window and grabbed a backpack containing diamonds. A third suspect stood nearby and pointed a handgun. Before fleeing, the suspects punctured the tires of the salespersons' car. BASIC SECURITY RECOMMENDAITONS WHEN CARRYING JEWELRY OFF PREMISES 1. Never resist in a robbery. 2. Salespersons must take evasive driving action after every sales call, and before returning to their hotel, home or office. Evasive driving tactics include driving very slowly, driving around the block, making U-turns or pulling into a bank or fast food parking lot. Are one or more cars following you? Be aware that gangs may be using multiple vehicles. Entrance and exit ramps of highways provide a particularly favorable opportunity for criminals to box in a salesperson's vehicle. 3. As you drive to a retail location, scout the area. Park as close to the main entrance to your destination as possible, Do not enter or exit by a rear or secluded entrance. Do not remain seated in your parked car for any length of time before or after sales calls. 4. Do not leave jewelry merchandise in an unattended vehicle. 5. If you are being followed, call 911 and say "I am about to be the victim of a robbery," If possible make your call obvious to the suspicious persons. When criminals see you using your cell phone after you have spotted them, they are less likely to pursue. 6. If you experience trouble with your car trunk lock, door lock or ignition key, or have a flat tire, radiator trouble or are bumped by another car, consider yourself a crime target. Immediately get yourself to a place of safety. 7. Jewelers should not take valuable jewelry merchandise to their homes. 8. Even if you are not carrying jewelry merchandise, if you are visiting jewelry premises and are carrying a bag of any sort, you are a target. 9. Gangs have been known to place GPS devices on the autos of salespersons. There are electronic devices available to detect the presence of GPS devices. Salespersons should also regularly inspect underneath their vehicle, and can carefully check their vehicle when a car is on a rack for an oil change. 10. Keep your travel plans confidential, including flights, departure and arrival times, hotels, rental cars and locations to be visited. 11. Do not gas up prior to returning a rental car. Either purchase through the rental car company beforehand, or simply return the car. It is important to limit your exposure to risk as much as possible, whether at rental car companies, restaurants, hotels, parking lots and elsewhere. 12. When you are entering a hotel lobby to check in, be particularly careful you are not being followed. 13. Retailers and traveling salespersons should cooperate, so that when a salesperson leaves a store to drive away, the retailer can keep an eye on the salesperson to make sure the salesperson is not being followed. SUMMARIES OF SELECTED ROBBERIES AND THEFTS OF TRAVELING SALESPERSONS AND OTHER OFF -PREMISES CASES FOR 2016. Gulfport, MS — On 11/5/16, the manager of a RETAIL JEWELRY STORE was the victim of a robbery while making her nightly bank deposit drop. As the manager pulled into a lane at the bank, a male suspect exited his vehicle and brandished a gun. He told the manager to give him the deposit bag. He grabbed the deposit funds and fled in a white Lexus. Lexington, KY — On 10/19/16, a traveling salesman was at a hotel parking lot. Five masked suspects jumped out of a van and threatened the salesman at gunpoint and knifepoint. The suspects stole 250 pieces of jewelry. Roswell, GA — On 10/19/16, a RETAIL JEWELER was leaving through the rear exit of her store. Four masked men approached her at gunpoint. They forced her into the back of a black van. Police managed to apprehend one suspect and the victim sustained non -life-threatening injuries. Las Vegas, NV — On 10/19/16, a traveling salesman traveled from Los Angeles, CA to Las Vegas, NV. He pulled over his car on the freeway to let down the top of his convertible. A car pulled up behind him and the armed driver of the car stole a briefcase containing diamonds. Lilburn, GA — On 10/16/16, a RETAIL JEWELER pulled into his garage after his wife opened the garage door. After the jeweler pulled in, a group of men blocked the open door. They smashed the passenger side window and the back window of the jeweler's car, and took his merchandise. Chattanooga, TN — On 10/13/16, traveling salesmen from Los Angeles, CA were attending a trunk show in Chattanooga, TN. The victims were followed from the show and were stopped on the road. One of the suspects brandished a knife. Both salesmen were assaulted and left bruised, and their jewelry stolen. Thousand Oaks, CA — On 10/6/16, the owner of a RETAIL JEWELRY STORE met a woman up the street from his store. The woman stated that she wanted to buy a used Rolex. The owner did not know the woman. They went to the owner's car, and once there, a male suspect jumped into the owner's backseat and held him at gunpoint. The suspects then stole jewelry. Naples, FL — On 10/5/16, four men in clown masks holding baseball bats hid in bushes watching a jeweler who was sitting in his vehicle. The jeweler heard a loud bang and got out of his car. As he walked around his SUV, two suspects hit him with bats. One of the suspects also had a gun. The suspects jumped into the jewelers SUV and drove off with his jewelry. New York, NY — On 9/29/16, a male suspect lifted a five gallon drum of gold flakes from the back of an unattended armored truck parked on the street. Kirkland, WA — On 9/21/16, a traveling salesman was driving his rental car on the expressway when he was abruptly cut off by another vehicle. Two men got out of their car and attacked the salesman in his vehicle on the shoulder of the road. The suspects smashed the car's windows and physically assaulted the salesman. They grabbed his line of jewelry, slashed his tires and then fled. Bellevue, WA — On 8/12/16, a traveling salesman was forced off of the road by another car. Two male suspects smashed his windows and stole jewelry. Anaheim, CA — On 8/9/16, a couple committed a distraction theft at a jewelry trade show. Douglasville, GA — On 8/8/16, a traveling salesman was accosted at gunpoint in the parking lot of a jewelry trade show. Queens, NY — On 7/18/16, a jeweler was robbed at gunpoint outside of his home. The jeweler parked his car in his driveway. As he walked out of the car, a man and woman approached him. The male suspect brandished a firearm and said "don't move, don't scream, give me the bag!" The suspects took the jewelers bag comprised of rings, bracelets and necklaces. Chicago, IL — On 7/2/16, a traveling salesman was at a jewelry trade show and had his jewelry in folded up cases. He turned his back to talk with friends. When he turned around, the cases containing his jewelry were gone. Woodland, NJ — On 6/18/16, there was a theft of jewelry at a trade show. Dallas, TX — On 6/9/16, a salesman from Pakistan was attacked at a gas station. He was kidnapped and beaten. He died from his injuries. Arlington, TX — On 6/2/16, a traveling salesman pulled into a gas station. A vehicle with masked subjects pulled alongside him. The subjects got out of their vehicle and ransacked the salesman's car. The subjects chased and dragged the victim, before eventually letting go and retreating. Beverly Hills, CA — On 5/22/16, the victim left jewelry in an unattended vehicle that was stolen at a jewelry trade show parking space. Houston, TX — On 5/16/16, a traveling watch salesman was in town purchasing watches, and was robbed at gunpoint as he stopped at an automotive store. His jewelry was stolen. Santa Barbara, CA — On 5/8/16, the victim left jewelry in an unattended vehicle that was stolen at a jewelry trade show parking space. Lawrenceville, GA — On 5/5/16, the victim left jewelry in an unattended vehicle in a parking lot that was stolen. Houston, TX — On 5/4/16, a salesman's car was boxed in at a parking lot. Four to five subjects were involved and stole merchandise. Monroeville, PA — On 4/2/16, a traveling salesman was followed from a jewelry trade show to a business and had his car blocked by several suspects. They punched the salesman in the face and then stole his jewelry. San Diego, CA — On 3/16/16, a jeweler was followed from a sales call. While he was loading items into his vehicle, three subjects approached him and demanded jewelry. The victim fought and the suspects punched and kicked him. The suspects dragged the victim by his backpack, struggled and took merchandise. Los Angeles, CA — On 3/16/16, the victim was getting back into his vehicle after eating at a restaurant. Two male suspects threatened him and demanded his jewelry. They opened the car door and the victim gave the suspects two pouches of diamonds. Houston, TX — On 3/15/16, a salesman left several sales calls. While exiting on an interstate highway, a vehicle in front of him slowed down. Then a vehicle came from behind him and slowed down as well, blocking him in. Three masked subjects with hoodies, broke the victim's window while displaying a knife. They hit the trunk release and took his jewelry. New York, NY — On 2/27/16, a suspect stole jewelry at a trade show. Palm Beach, FL — On 2/15/16, the suspect approached a booth at a trade show and was coughing and choking. The employee at the booth got the suspect water. At that point the suspect was able to walk away with a watch. Los Angeles, CA — On 2/9/16, the victim left jewelry in an unattended vehicle that was stolen at a parking lot. Boca Raton, FL — On 2/7/16, the suspect(s) stole a diamond ring and a pin from a jewelry trade show. Los Angeles, CA — On 1/21/16, salesmen were in a taxi heading to the airport when an SUV slowed down in front of the taxi on the highway and reversed into the taxi. Three males in dark clothing and masks exited and smashed the rear windows and said, "Give us what you have!" The suspects stabbed the victims with an unknown type of weapon, possibly a knife or punch, and removed the victims' property. Atlanta, GA — On 1/9/16, a suspect committed a sneak theft and stole necklaces at the booth of a jewelry trade show while employees were occupied at the far end of the booth. Get daily crime messages from JSA at the Crime Message Center on JSA's website: http://www.mewelerssecur!tV.org/message read.php?action=read. You can also post crime messages. John J. Kennedy, President, Jewelers' Security Alliance Scott F. Guginsky, Vice President (NYPD Retired) 212-687-0328 Our records indicate this email is transmitted with the express permission of the recipient as a member of the Jewelers' Security Alliance Crime Alert Network. If you wish to unsubscribe, reply to Isa2(a)iewelerssecurity.org, and in the Subject line please type REMOVE. Your email address will be removed within 48 hours of receipt of your request and a final confirming message will be sent to you that this has been accomplished. Jewelers' Security Alliance is headquartered at 6 East 45th Street, New York, NY 10017. Copyright ©. 2016 by Jewelers' Security Alliance OB -1 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS East 191h Street Safe Route to School Project 16-17 OB -1 -ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 18 February 2017 Katrina Foley; Mayor Sandra L. Genis; Mayor Pro Tem John B. Stevens; Council Member James M. Righeimer; Council Member Allan R. Mansoor; Council Member Re: East 19th Street Safe Route to School Project Dear Honorable Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and Council Members, As I am unable to personally attend the Council Meeting on February 21St, I am writing this to again make you aware of my strong support for the East 19th Street Safe Route to School Project. My wife and I bought our home at 466 East 19th Street in 1989 and continue to live here. I'd like to share a little history on this subject with you. In 1993, sidewalks on both sides of the street were installed. This was a great improvement. They have always been heavily travelled by neighbors walking dogs, their children, and commuters to Mariners Park and Library across Irvine Avenue. When the 55 Freeway was completed and connected to the signal at 19th Street in 1994, the quality of life changed dramatically on East 191h Street for the worse. The speed and volume of traffic became such factor that a Traffic Calming Study occurred in 1997. The redesign of all the through streets between East 17th Street and East 19th Street that was recommended by an Ad- hoc committee of residents during that Study was not agreeable to many of the residents and was not approved by the City Council at that time. A lot has changed in the 20 years since the last Traffic Calming Study. The pace of life and the density of construction has increased dramatically. Cell phones and other handheld devices for music and entertainment now accompany the majority of drivers. Our sidewalks on East 19th Street are used more and more by pedestrians and young families. This combination is terrifying after witnessing more side swiped and demolished vehicles on our street than we can remember, many times by drivers under the influence of alcohol or drugs. At this point, my neighbors and I consider it a miracle that some of these accidents have not involved a pedestrian. It is time for a change on East 19th Street. The Safe Route to School project that was completed on Broadway in 2012 is a beautiful, successful example of what can be done to calm and control the speed of traffic. Follow up traffic studies by Transportation Services have proven that traffic has NOT been diverted to adjacent, less traveled streets like Magnolia and Flower. The CM Bike Committee approved the 19th Street project on February 1 by a vote of 14-1. In closing, I sincerely ask you to approve the East 19th Safe Route to School Project at your February 21s' Meeting. The scope of this project is minor in nature in comparison to the Broadway project, and it could have a positive effect on the dangerous speed of traffic on this heavily traveled street. Thank you for considering my feelings on this subject. Sincerely, Jeff & Nona McCon ville 466 East 19th Street Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Cell Phone# 714-478-1105 Stn Street Prc jEl yds T" A Ap 'Rn 74 W f ^w: _ w i b IN GENERAL NOTES 1, ALL WORK, LABOR ANO MATERULS SMALL BE IN CONFORMITY WITH TIE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, (SPPWC), LATEST EDITION, THE STANOMO SPECIFICATIONS ANO SIANDARO DRAWINGS OF ME CITY OF COSTA MESA, (LATEST EDITION): THESE DIANE THE PRO.IECT CONSTRUCTOR DOCUMENTS: AND ALL SAFETY REGULATIONS, CODES, AND REQUIREMENTS PERTINENT TO THE PROTECT CONSTRUCTOR 2 ME CONTRACTOR SHALL MMMAIN TRAFFIC IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PRNECT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS MY SHALL PROVIDE 24 HOUR SERVICE TO REMOVE, INSTALL, RELOCATE. ANO MAINTAIN RALPH DEVICES, 3 LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTL@ES SHOWN ON THE PUNS ARE BASED ON INFORMATION RECENED FROM THE VICIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, LOCAL AGENCIES AND FIELD INVESTIGATIONS THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED THAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, AND EXTREME CAUTION IS REQUIREO TO PROTECT ME EXISTING LAPIDIES 4. AT NO TIME IS ANY RESIDENT TO BE WITHOUT ANY ACCESS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE PRO/ECT ADMINISMARON DIVISION.TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. IF DISCREPANCIES ANO/OR DEIMTIONS ARISE DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER WILL DETERMINE AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND REVISE THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. 7 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO BUTTE, OFFSITE ANO ADJACENT HOLMES. FACILITIES. AND PROPERTIES. 8 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY AND PROPER PRECAUTIONS i0 PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES THAT AMY OCCUR FROM STORMWATER RUNOFF AND/OR DEPOSITION OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM ANY AND ALL WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS 9 ALL SURVEY MONUMENTS SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED BY THE CONSTRUCTOR OF THIS PRO ECT AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RESTORATION OF ALL LOST OR OBLITERATED MONUMENTS. AS SPECIFIED BY THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT 10 ME CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AS REWIRED FROM COY OF COSTA MESA AND APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS, TT. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CMD91ONS AND ELEVATORS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL INFORM ME ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS. 12. COORDINATION NOTE: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE THING OF CONSTRUCTION WISH THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND ME ENGINEER J. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ENVYING IN PUCE AND INTACT AND SHALL INFORM THE ENGINEER OF ANY WNFLICTS. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES MAT IN ACCORDANCE WHO GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REWIRED i0 ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE GONDOLAS DURING ME CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROTECT INCLUDING ME SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTIES THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE APPLIED COMINUOUSLY AND NOT BE FAIRED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. AND THE CONTRACTOR FURTHER AGREES i0 DEFEND. INDEMNIFY, AND PROTECT THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AGAINST ALL REAL OR ALLEGED CLAIMS IN CONNECTION WITH RIE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT EXCEPTING LIABILITIES ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES AND USES: THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USE OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PIANS BASIS OF BEARINGS: SAY PUN£ CWRANAIL SYSI£M OF NN 83, CWFOPNU ZONE 6 BENCH MARK: IACWC{ Lib/NTY �D WORKS ml,: [M-48-89 BEAUTY MAYA rzEL (MYSI) YAR AWN IE -101-74. BERTON 95626 FEEL (NAVA%) YEW 2X195 SURVEY SURVEY PERFORMED BY CALVAW SURVEYING LL ' .. TOLL FREE MW.[ ¢maR DRIVE FAIL (9 9S OY OAST , n�rA'.bM-9JMLE.WI ww.n below. xblT NHNFA 34283 CW..E I HLGLll CO. —M.t REVISIONS PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF COSTA MESA IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR FROM CHURCH STREET TO IRVINE AVENUE FEDERAL PROJECT NO. SRTSL-5312(089) CITY PROJECT NO. 16-17 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE BC fg CF CL DAY EC EXIST G PP RILTR SRH SS TC ITCH Y- T4 IF TO TBM LEGEND/SYMBOLS BEGIN HORIZONTAL CURVE CATCH BASIN CURB FACE CENTERLINE ORNEWAY ENO HORIZONTAL CURVE EXISTING FLOWUNE GAS LINE POWER DOLE REFLECTOR SEWER MARBLE SANITARY SEWER LINE TOP OF CURB TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULLBOX WATER LINE FIRE R ORWT GUY ANCHOR STORM ORNN MANXOLE TOP OF WALL TOP OF FWTING TOP OF HEADER TEMPORARY BENCH MARK O CARS METER 1><I GAS VALVE m GUY DOLE YµiVM WATER METER r4 WATER VALVE I UTILITY POLE ® 5EWER MANHOLE CN CONSTRUCTION NOTE GB GRADE BREAK OCSO ORANGE COUNTY SWRATION DISTRICT M MONUMENT FS FINISHED SURFACE LD LOCAL DEPRESSION 5W SIDEWALK LI -7 FULL DEPTH AC OCOLD MILL DASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX OVERLAY L-3 (ARHM) CALL THE FOLLOWING UTILITY AGENCIES (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION PUBLIC UTILITY AGENCY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO, MR DAVID SALOWIN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CAS W. TRANS MS ROSLYN SQUIRES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EPSON COMPANY MR JEFF GILBERT MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT MR. MARK PELTA COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT MR. ROBIN DRIVERS AT&T TELEPHONE MR CRAIG AKIN XO COMMUNDATIONs MR, STEWART M[WUSUND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OC MS LYNN ELLIOTT INDEX MAP scuE r=ado' (714) 634-3267 WHD LLC E. 19TH STREET C-3 m o a CE i Y C-6 <L 0 695-0363 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT STRIPING PLAN zCE CHUCK STEINBERGS (949) SHEET 3 SHEET 4 IRRIGATION PUN SHEET 5 SHEET 6 SHEET 7 INDEX MAP scuE r=ado' (714) 634-3267 WHD LLC TYPICAL SECTORS AND GUMS C-3 NALCOM CORTEZ (818) 701-4546. VERIZON BUSINESS PW4 AND PROFILE C-6 BRYAN CHURCH (71A) 695-0363 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT STRIPING PLAN LI -1 CHUCK STEINBERGS (949) 631-12W M POWER COMMUNICATIONS INC. IRRIGATION PUN LI -4 MR. NARK DENWNG (949) 631-1731 TIME WARNER IRRIGATION DETNLS LI -7 MR JOE RAPIDS (714) 237-6165 MERiOPOLITAN WATER DIST OF S0. CA, PLANTING& CONSTRUCTION DETAILS PUN L-3 MR KIERAN CALLAHAN (949) 417-7762 OCTA / BUS SERVICES PLANTING LEGEND. NOTES AND DETAILS 5-1 MR. MARK STRICKERT (714) 593-73M E-0.1LIGHTING LIST OF DRAWINGS SM. N0. DESCRIPT10N T - I TYLE SHEET C-2 TYPICAL SECTORS AND GUMS C-3 PUN AND PROFILE C-4 PUN AND PROFILE C-5 PW4 AND PROFILE C-6 PLAN AND PROFILE C-7 PUN ANO PROFILE C-8 STRIPING PLAN LI -1 IRRIGATION PLAN U-2 ;VIBRATION PLAN LI -J IRRIGATION PUN LI -4 IRRIGATION PUN LI -5 IRRIGATION NOTES AND LEGEND L16 IRRIGATION DETNLS LI -7 IRRIGATION DETAILS L -I PCMRNG & CONSTRUCTION DETAILS PIAN L-2 PLANTING& CONSTRUCTION DETAILS PUN L-3 PLANTING & CONSTRUCTION DETAILS PUN L-4 PLATINC PEAR L-5 PLANTING LEGEND. NOTES AND DETAILS 5-1 PLANS. ELEVATIONS, DETAILS AND STRUCTURAL NOTES E-0 GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS, INDEX & SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM E-0.1LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE & PANEL SCHEDULES E-0.2 FXTURE SPECIFICATIONS E -I ELECTRICAL POWER PIAN-FULLERION AVENUE INTERSECTION E-2 ELECTRICAL POWER PIAN -IRVINE AVENUE INTERSECTION TCP -I TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANTCP-2 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TCP -3 TRAFFIC CONTROL PUN TCP -4 TRAFFIC CONTROL PIAN TCP-5TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TCP -6 TRAFFIC CONTROL PUN REFERENCESgip, QRocEss)oy SEE INgNDUAL 91EEL5 ORAYM BP: APPRO4E0 BY: Q�O�0.RNAM/7/gry/Fa EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDED BY: a REC. BY. No. 34283 APPROVED BY�"b : TITLE SHEET GH �9J cIV TL Q$� BALTA7M MEJA. COX ENGNEER R.C.E. /50330 f O` CITY OF COSTA MESA PLAN NUMBER (949) 453-5515 (626) 430-4572 (714) 378-3229 (949) 864-0296 (714) 903-8A7 (213) 217-7474 (714) 560 -WSJ 1 BE 32 T-1 EX. SECTION 'A -A' N.T.S. SECTION 'B -B' N.T.S. SECTION 'E -E' NTS. REMOVE PORTION DF EXIST. TOP SUB 6" 14 BAR MIN REMOVE EXP PLATE ASSEA DOWEL BAR TOLL FREE , CHAMFEN PER SPPWC wwrt ¢xrtA ow�E STD PUN 300-3 94 BAR , wx'.Ox1-SdFR.K �^ x�.w.n Eelow -,\EXIST WLNJUI ... LiCExA xn AND LOG! CATCH BASIN #A BAR it DOWEL BAF EXIST. RCP R.UN STUBOUR SECTION 'HN_TS I FACE OC EX w AGGREWTE SE COURSE BAR BSS" O.C. SECTION 'F -F' NTS PLATE ASSEMBLY —FACE BAR Olt" 0C PER SPPWC STD PLAN JOO-3 I 13 E% AC PJMT—A RL PEI SECTION 'C -C' N.T.S. R/W EX. BAS SECTION 'G -G' N.T.S. T SECTION 'D -D' N.T.S. JtI.IIVIV I—I N.T.S. CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION NOTES O REMOVE AND CONSTRUCT 3' WOE AC SLOT PAWMENT EVIL PEEN. 6" DEEP AC WITH TOP 2" THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARRAN OVERLAY IO COLD MILL 2" THICK MIN EXISTING PAVEMENT SURFACE O CONSTRUCT 2" THICK MIN ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM) OVERLAY O CONSTRUCT 6" CURB A, GUTTER, TYPE "C-6" (W=18-), OVER 6" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STD. DWG, NO. 312 SO CONSTRUCT 8" CURB 6 GUTTER TFPE T-8" (W=24), OVER 6" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA SO) DW& N0. 312 © CONSTRUCT 8' MEDAN CURB. PER SPPWC SN. PIAN 120-2, AI -8(200) O] CONSTRUCT 4" TRICK PCC SIDEWALK OVER A- CMB PER CIM OF COSTA MESA STO DRAWING N0. 411 9O CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STD, DWG. N0, 415 11 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY, TYPE T", PER SPPWC STD. PIAN 110-2 13 CONSTRUCT LOCAL DEPRESSION PER Cl OF COSTA MESA STP OWL NO 315 19 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAN PER SPPWC 51D, PUN 151-2, (MODIFIED) 31 CONSTRUCT 6" DEEP AC, WOH TOP Y (HICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM) OWRIAY REMOVAL NOTES 1❑ REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER 2� REMOW AND DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY O REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTMG ROADWAY SECTION 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING MEDAN CURB Q REMOK AND SALVAGE EXSTING PAVER BLOCK © REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK BI REMOVE AND DSPoSE PORTION OF EXISTING CROSS -GUTTER 14 REMOVE EXISTING MISCELLANEOUS BASE DISPOSITION NOTES © PROTECT IN PLACE G S,FWx 9]«VM 5tC I ION K -K ALTS, FAQ aOHEnM/pNq( EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS tiP e Roti F�� No. 34283 SECTIONS AND DETAILS *N,9rE pF CAl\FOQ��- PE AAL CITY OF COSTA MESA 2 OF 32 PLAN NUMBER C-2 CALL TOLL FREE , wwrt ¢xrtA ow�E FAzx1E1.ix))YYwn , wx'.Ox1-SdFR.K _ 199) SAS -w]> x�.w.n Eelow (,g8poxxyypyya p,gl_ WLNJUI ... LiCExA xn REVISIONS S,FWx 9]«VM 5tC I ION K -K ALTS, FAQ aOHEnM/pNq( EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS tiP e Roti F�� No. 34283 SECTIONS AND DETAILS *N,9rE pF CAl\FOQ��- PE AAL CITY OF COSTA MESA 2 OF 32 PLAN NUMBER C-2 �NLY TOP OF C UAN 39.29 2 1QA 4I 0/ m WV 9BJv- Y ME IAN UP BE CURB CALL TOLL GREE ' .wn-W TAX'W 9.>, REVISIONS NOTES: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING TREES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, HARDSCAPE. LAWNS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM, FENCE, WALLS, ETC., DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER OR CITY. DL 0 REFERENCES SEE DESIGNED BY: IXgWOUAL SHEETS aRAWB BY: NLLOPMM GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 1 inch= 208. O REMOVE AND CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, 6" DEEP AC WBIR TOP 2' THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARAM) OVERLAY 4O CONSTRUCT 6' CURB & GUTTER, TYPE "C-6" (W=18'). OVER 6" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA SID OWG, NO 312 SO CONSTRUCT 8" CURB & GUTTER TYPE T-8" (W-24"), OVER 6" CMB PER GUY OF COSTA MESA 510, DWG. NO. 312 © CONSTRUCT 8" MEDAN CURB. PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 120-2 A1-8(200) O CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC SIOFNALK BEER 4" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO. DRAWING NO 411 ® CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS SIO, PIAN RSP ABBA 9O CONSTRUCT CROSS BIDDER PER CRY OF COSTA MESA STD. DWG. NO. 415 10 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY APPROACH ME I PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO DWG N0. 513 II CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY, TYPE T', PER SPPWC STD PUN 110-2 12 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN I (MODIFIED) PER CITY OF COSTA MESA SIR DWG. NO. 417 15 RELOCATE EXISTING STREET SIGN IIS RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX p RELOCATE EXISDNC STREET GONE 18 INSTALL WATER SERVICE .0 METER PER MESA WATER DISTRICT STO. DWG. #1 TRENCH GET PER CIN OF COSTA MESA STO. DWG. NO. 813. SIZE PER LS. PUN ® ADJUST TO CHASE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 21 AOIU4 TO GWNE EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHgE (BY TEL. COMPANY) 22 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING WATER ✓ALVE 24 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING N/CABLE BOX (CABLE COMPANY) 25 ANGST TO GRADE EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE (BY ELECTRIC COMPANY) 26 ANUST TO GRADE EXISTING ELECTRIC PULL BOX (BY ELECTRIC COMPANY) 29 INSTALL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PUN © REMOVE ANO CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, (MIN 6" DEEP AC). RECOMPACT EXISTING BASE COURSE 3$ INSTALL 4" PEC SCH 40 DRAIN PIPE (JOIN EXISTING ORMN PIPE) SIS INSTALL SLEEVES AS SHOWN INV MIS PLAN AND ON LANDSCAPE4RAKNTION PUNS (NUMBER AND SIZE OF SLEEVES PER PUN) [M MATCH/JOIN EXISTING DATA © PROTECT IN PLACE _.. m %COTE$ REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING CURB & GUTIER ". Dy D�. �ma F3 REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING ROADWAY SECTION ® REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING MEOIAN CURB 5� ¢ © Q�8u, m 0 REMOVE MO DISPOSE EXISTING CROSS -GUTTER OC M REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING SMR ACCESS 20'005P u 30.10 965.46 15.05 1.47'10" C5 12.11 4.00 173'25'38' CIS 33.81 225.00 16.94 8'36'32' C7 25.64 120.00 12.92 17(741" C8 o 4.00 43.10 169'23'41' - 15.71 5.00 1 - 180'00'15" C10 18.16 119g9.1gW43-55lr- < I. 19.97 20.C13 9.45 m�Wovh w . I MEOIAN of cu 3.80 22' 43'E m «L q m ea 10.CBS mm. � 15.71 10 +015% " -SL am 000% 21% a� 29695 .0n 95 SCALE jHORIZ' 1--20' VEWT- 1 -A m"J:. I.N Y MEDIAN a T OF CURB D v 11 B3 1816 I5.7I' 2975' 338E m U m y O1 AA I/,, OC Dn/ d� 4 d� w .. /4/4/4✓4 ,1C. 4 9e u o a F 0 8 -- - - ry ry ^ SLY IOP o e. EX CRAOE OCL O£ROADo � ' m. IS "1m ry ry aao .." am "� ry rvmr a.«a R MEDIAN CURB ry m mn . o'^,R' m q u m CL 95 -m w2+z ra m, mha +D losem. --aOJ Y ME IAN UP BE CURB CALL TOLL GREE ' .wn-W TAX'W 9.>, REVISIONS NOTES: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING TREES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, HARDSCAPE. LAWNS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM, FENCE, WALLS, ETC., DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER OR CITY. DL 0 REFERENCES SEE DESIGNED BY: IXgWOUAL SHEETS aRAWB BY: NLLOPMM GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 1 inch= 208. O REMOVE AND CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, 6" DEEP AC WBIR TOP 2' THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARAM) OVERLAY 4O CONSTRUCT 6' CURB & GUTTER, TYPE "C-6" (W=18'). OVER 6" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA SID OWG, NO 312 SO CONSTRUCT 8" CURB & GUTTER TYPE T-8" (W-24"), OVER 6" CMB PER GUY OF COSTA MESA 510, DWG. NO. 312 © CONSTRUCT 8" MEDAN CURB. PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 120-2 A1-8(200) O CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC SIOFNALK BEER 4" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO. DRAWING NO 411 ® CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS SIO, PIAN RSP ABBA 9O CONSTRUCT CROSS BIDDER PER CRY OF COSTA MESA STD. DWG. NO. 415 10 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY APPROACH ME I PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO DWG N0. 513 II CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY, TYPE T', PER SPPWC STD PUN 110-2 12 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN I (MODIFIED) PER CITY OF COSTA MESA SIR DWG. NO. 417 15 RELOCATE EXISTING STREET SIGN IIS RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX p RELOCATE EXISDNC STREET GONE 18 INSTALL WATER SERVICE .0 METER PER MESA WATER DISTRICT STO. DWG. #1 TRENCH GET PER CIN OF COSTA MESA STO. DWG. NO. 813. SIZE PER LS. PUN ® ADJUST TO CHASE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 21 AOIU4 TO GWNE EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHgE (BY TEL. COMPANY) 22 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING WATER ✓ALVE 24 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING N/CABLE BOX (CABLE COMPANY) 25 ANGST TO GRADE EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE (BY ELECTRIC COMPANY) 26 ANUST TO GRADE EXISTING ELECTRIC PULL BOX (BY ELECTRIC COMPANY) 29 INSTALL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PUN © REMOVE ANO CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, (MIN 6" DEEP AC). RECOMPACT EXISTING BASE COURSE 3$ INSTALL 4" PEC SCH 40 DRAIN PIPE (JOIN EXISTING ORMN PIPE) SIS INSTALL SLEEVES AS SHOWN INV MIS PLAN AND ON LANDSCAPE4RAKNTION PUNS (NUMBER AND SIZE OF SLEEVES PER PUN) [M MATCH/JOIN EXISTING DATA © PROTECT IN PLACE FOWNAL. O %COTE$ REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING CURB & GUTIER 22] REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISIING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY F3 REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING ROADWAY SECTION ® REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING MEOIAN CURB 5� ¢ © REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 0 m 0 REMOVE MO DISPOSE EXISTING CROSS -GUTTER 10 REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING PARKWAY PWN M REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING SMR ACCESS 20'005P u 30.10 965.46 15.05 1.47'10" C5 12.11 4.00 69.66 173'25'38' CIS 33.81 225.00 16.94 8'36'32' C7 25.64 120.00 12.92 17(741" C8 o 4.00 43.10 169'23'41' n 15.71 5.00 1 - 180'00'15" C10 18.16 119g9.1gW43-55lr- 56' OSW L15 I. 19.97 20.C13 9.45 w 1505 YIOP OF CURB 3.80 N35' 22' 43'E 49.87 5 LY ttP Of CIRN tL q m ea 10.CBS � 15.71 10 +015% " -SL am a. a� +O TT9 \FEF SCALE jHORIZ' 1--20' VEWT- 1 -A m"J:. Y ME IAN UP BE CURB CALL TOLL GREE ' .wn-W TAX'W 9.>, REVISIONS NOTES: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING TREES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, HARDSCAPE. LAWNS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM, FENCE, WALLS, ETC., DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER OR CITY. DL 0 REFERENCES SEE DESIGNED BY: IXgWOUAL SHEETS aRAWB BY: NLLOPMM GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 1 inch= 208. O REMOVE AND CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, 6" DEEP AC WBIR TOP 2' THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARAM) OVERLAY 4O CONSTRUCT 6' CURB & GUTTER, TYPE "C-6" (W=18'). OVER 6" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA SID OWG, NO 312 SO CONSTRUCT 8" CURB & GUTTER TYPE T-8" (W-24"), OVER 6" CMB PER GUY OF COSTA MESA 510, DWG. NO. 312 © CONSTRUCT 8" MEDAN CURB. PER SPPWC STD. PLAN 120-2 A1-8(200) O CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC SIOFNALK BEER 4" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO. DRAWING NO 411 ® CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS SIO, PIAN RSP ABBA 9O CONSTRUCT CROSS BIDDER PER CRY OF COSTA MESA STD. DWG. NO. 415 10 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY APPROACH ME I PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO DWG N0. 513 II CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY, TYPE T', PER SPPWC STD PUN 110-2 12 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN I (MODIFIED) PER CITY OF COSTA MESA SIR DWG. NO. 417 15 RELOCATE EXISTING STREET SIGN IIS RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX p RELOCATE EXISDNC STREET GONE 18 INSTALL WATER SERVICE .0 METER PER MESA WATER DISTRICT STO. DWG. #1 TRENCH GET PER CIN OF COSTA MESA STO. DWG. NO. 813. SIZE PER LS. PUN ® ADJUST TO CHASE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 21 AOIU4 TO GWNE EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHgE (BY TEL. COMPANY) 22 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING WATER ✓ALVE 24 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING N/CABLE BOX (CABLE COMPANY) 25 ANGST TO GRADE EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE (BY ELECTRIC COMPANY) 26 ANUST TO GRADE EXISTING ELECTRIC PULL BOX (BY ELECTRIC COMPANY) 29 INSTALL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PUN © REMOVE ANO CONSTRUCT 12" WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, (MIN 6" DEEP AC). RECOMPACT EXISTING BASE COURSE 3$ INSTALL 4" PEC SCH 40 DRAIN PIPE (JOIN EXISTING ORMN PIPE) SIS INSTALL SLEEVES AS SHOWN INV MIS PLAN AND ON LANDSCAPE4RAKNTION PUNS (NUMBER AND SIZE OF SLEEVES PER PUN) IT [M MATCH/JOIN EXISTING DATA © PROTECT IN PLACE FOWNAL. O %COTE$ REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING CURB & GUTIER 22] REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISIING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY F3 REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING ROADWAY SECTION ® REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING MEOIAN CURB 5� REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING PAVER BLOCK © REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 0 REMOVE AVE) DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB RAMP 0 REMOVE MO DISPOSE EXISTING CROSS -GUTTER 10 REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING PARKWAY PWN M REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING SMR ACCESS IT CURVE DATA REMOVE EXISTING STREET LIGHT/POWER POLE SEGMENT SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA CI 39.29 2500 25.02 9092'36' C2 3042 90.00 15.36 19'2206" C3 29.79 65.00 15.05 20'005P C4 30.10 965.46 15.05 1.47'10" C5 12.11 4.00 69.66 173'25'38' CIS 33.81 225.00 16.94 8'36'32' C7 25.64 120.00 12.92 17(741" C8 11.83 4.00 43.10 169'23'41' C9 15.71 5.00 1 - 180'00'15" C10 18.16 119g9.1gW43-55lr- 56' OSW L15 Cil 19.97 20.C13 L40 9.45 S40' 1505 10.Cis 3.80 N35' 22' 43'E 49.87 .30.C54 14.58 10.CBS 15.71 10 IT REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING COAX BUMPERS U REMOVE EXISTING STREET LIGHT/POWER POLE SEGMENT AND DELIVER TO CITY YARD COORDINATE DIRECTION MEN THE CITY PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 15 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING MOW STRIP ?F�� GEMEA MTgg9/F EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS w e a No.%283 m 19TH ST. AT CHURCH ST. AND FULLERTON AVE PLAN N�'le of c n��FOQao PE EA CITY OF COSTA MESA 3 BE 32 PLAN NUMBER C-3 LINE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH I DIRECTION LI 122.25 x49' 22' 23"W L2 6.20 N40' 17' 08'E L3 33.03 N69' 25' 45"W L4 3R45 N49- 20 54'W 15 46.72 S54' 37' 14"E LIS 32.28 563' 13' 46"E L7 1.74 N39' 28' O1"E LB 21.02 S5W 31' 591 L9 6.34 S39' 28' 01"W LIO 20.29 N49' 20' 54"W 111 3.00 549' 20' 54'E L12 2.52 N45' 55' 11"W L14 131.07 N50' 56' OSW L15 4.04 N35' 21' 43"E L40 9.45 S40' 51' 2VIN L41 3.80 N35' 22' 43'E L42 1 57.06 ?F�� GEMEA MTgg9/F EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS w e a No.%283 m 19TH ST. AT CHURCH ST. AND FULLERTON AVE PLAN N�'le of c n��FOQao PE EA CITY OF COSTA MESA 3 BE 32 PLAN NUMBER C-3 :.5352 ETC CURVE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH MRECDM LID SEGMENT LENGTH d/ d� d� [i5 -NLY _ 14.50 05 m 0. 52 e C17 53.76 CONSTRUCTION IO REMOVE AND CONSTRUCT 3WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, 6" DEEP AC WITH TOP 2" THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM) OVERLAY 1I - OC -- 53,56 19 50 PC 53]6' - C19 14.44 - M C20 13.79 : - _. REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXIST FENCE (AS NEEDED), C21 - 25.00122'27'19' _ _ _ _ d� d� T COLD MILL 2 TACK MIN EXISTING PAVEMENT SURFACE 25.00122.3854' a Z u 14.22 d/ d� F d� d u 14.33 Z u Il 326014" COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PRIM i0 REMOVAL F. u 'o 45.93 xu C26 1 53.36 - F 40 \ 45.37 42'17'20" G 6 JO CONSTRUCT 2" THICK MIN ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARPM) OVERLAY 32'3356' ,n a 19 INSTALL ORRATKIN CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PLAN m a + ,� ,.r_ m---�.'P o u m b. 2u S -- - - / £ C` OO CONSTRUCT 6' CURB & OUSTER, TAPE T-6" (W-18 ), OVER fi CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO. DWG, NO 312 - - - - REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXIST CLOCK (AS NEEDED) m m. - +o zs% 02%..io 45 CL 95 +:^ - ,. _ _I 027% -e- _ ..L,. U nc. L_� ^� r. 95 O CPONSiRUCi 9" THIGH PCC SIDEWALK OVER 9' CMB _------- --. - Y TOP CF CUR - - CON4FUCi 6' DEEP A.C. WITH TOP 2' THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (RAIN) OVERLAY - -1421.. : �'� -1� \ -- PER CIT' OF COSTA MESA SID DRAWING. ND. 911 oa - .y' - � INSTALL SLEEKS AS SHOWN ON THIS PUN AND ON LANDSCAPE/IRRICATON PLANS - 5356 DENTCAL B - Y.. CRAG[ / --- CL OF Pnen .918' 53 J6'i,.r A _2 R_a0 "33- C ® CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER GLTFNJS SHE PIAN RSP AB81 POINT :.5352 ETC CURVE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH MRECDM LID SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUSk45,71 [i5 -NLY 05 _ 14.50 05 m 0. 52 e " L :- ' CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER PER CM OF COSTA MESA STI. DWG N0. 415 1635 IS RELOCATE EXISTING STREET SIGN E.L 95 p C IV w - L8 INSTALL WATER SERJICE AND METER PER MESA WATER DISTRICT STY DWG. 11 a u ! TRENCH DET PER CITY OF COSTA MESA ST0. DWG rv0 813 SIZE PER E.G. PLAN - - - -F k ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE AYIUST T7 GRADE EXISTING WRIER VALVE CALL ' ® vV TOLL FREE peso w.oc ...R 6MW , : NK.4 92616 PL Y9i94 se IK76 .nm.belmv. nax2n.w:aS L9zeT :Ao. Call w.smxem.w,me. u[wss x0. REVISIONS NOTES: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING TREES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. HARDSCAPE. LAWNS, IRRIGATION SYSTEM, FENCE, WALLS, ETC., DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONORION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER OR CITY. I DESIGNED BY: DANK REFERENCES a WESTMINSTER AVE SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION F -F AND K -K] CURVE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH MRECDM LID SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUSk45,71 [i5 -NLY 05 _ 14.50 05 23 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING WATER METER C17 53.76 - 17 OC 1I - OC -- 53,56 25.00122'44'41" TOP OF CURB C19 14.44 - - C20 13.79 : - 28 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXIST FENCE (AS NEEDED), C21 EX GRADE 25.00122'27'19' w d� d� 4 d� d I d d d / / /4 25.00122.3854' - 14.22 25.00323559' C24 14.33 Z u Il 326014" COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PRIM i0 REMOVAL 53.82 ®LY W ROA 45.93 122'52'40' C26 1 53.36 2500 1 45.37 42'17'20" C27 14.21 25.00 7.30 32'3356' LX GRADE 0 CL OF ROAD_ a 19 INSTALL ORRATKIN CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PLAN A REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXIST CLOCK (AS NEEDED) CON4FUCi 6' DEEP A.C. WITH TOP 2' THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (RAIN) OVERLAY - -1421.. oa J6 INSTALL SLEEKS AS SHOWN ON THIS PUN AND ON LANDSCAPE/IRRICATON PLANS I ]9 5343' Stv i0P 6 CU B pC. d� [�A/ d/ "33- C 53 - 5336 -0 C 37.0: 1421 C d�¢ (NUMBER AND SIZE OF SLEEVES PER PLAN) AL 0 r C. OC ¢ m mum 0 A _ 3] 98 ]614 d� d� 4a, u u q1I / �•wr� d REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CURB Ar BUFFER _ 'L"ym' _o REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING RODWAY SECTION . a `'w_3 mr 4046% 018f "w REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK :- +OAF _ _ _ _ { SIJ F N O REMOVE AND DISPOSE E%ISTING CONCRETE CURB RAMP SLY TOP OF CURB. _ _ _ STS TOP :OF CURD SCALE SL 1C _ _. _ pF NRB 8❑ REMOVE AND. DISPOSE PORTION OF EXISTING CROSS -CUTTER HORIZ: 1"=20' DMIROSMON NOTES 12+00 13+00 14+00 19+00 20+00 ORANGE AVE IM TCH/JOIN EXISTING �y R/vA1{ •�!_ ..,.._la...rt ¢ Ill..n �R/W 10+38.98 © PROTECT IN PLACE CALL ' ® vV TOLL FREE peso w.oc ...R 6MW , : NK.4 92616 PL Y9i94 se IK76 .nm.belmv. nax2n.w:aS L9zeT :Ao. Call w.smxem.w,me. u[wss x0. REVISIONS NOTES: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING TREES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. HARDSCAPE. LAWNS, IRRIGATION SYSTEM, FENCE, WALLS, ETC., DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONORION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER OR CITY. I DESIGNED BY: DANK REFERENCES a WESTMINSTER AVE SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION F -F AND K -K] AS%NLT RUBBER HOT MIX MRUY (MAIM) CURVE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH MRECDM LID SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUSk45,71 L21 DELTA C16 14.50 25.0033'14'20" 4.28 S40- 49' 47"W L54 C17 53.76 25.00123'12'36 C18 53,56 25.00122'44'41" C19 14.44 250033XI5'42 C20 13.79 25.0031.36'45" C21 53.43 25.00122'27'19' C22 53.52 25.00122.3854' C23 14.22 25.00323559' C24 14.33 25.00 7.37 326014" G25 53.82 2500 45.93 122'52'40' C26 1 53.36 2500 1 45.37 42'17'20" C27 14.21 25.00 7.30 32'3356' AS%NLT RUBBER HOT MIX MRUY (MAIM) 20 0 10 20 40 I inch= 10ft. EFO4.nO TIER MlRn•9�F' EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS a 4 32 ND.3azea 19TH ST. AT ORANGE AND WESTMINSTER AVE. PLAN AND PROFILE PLAIN NUMBER /� PE SEAL CITY OF COSTA MESA LINE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH MRECDM LID 1.73 N40- 38' 09'E L20 TED N4W 33' 07-E L21 3,31 N40' 38' 15"E L22 8.83 540' 40' 30"W L23 4.28 S40- 49' 47"W L54 5.49' N20' 38' S6'E 20 0 10 20 40 I inch= 10ft. EFO4.nO TIER MlRn•9�F' EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS a 4 32 ND.3azea 19TH ST. AT ORANGE AND WESTMINSTER AVE. PLAN AND PROFILE PLAIN NUMBER /� PE SEAL CITY OF COSTA MESA SANTA ANA AVE CAL( TOLL FREE ' IN BOBO rUV' LEx1ER DNVE , NxE, U 59 V77 O Pxl-SOu UC ex, (91915&5 04]3 voo.. below N.11114 AMmex waea CEIM-M,Ibm �A, REVISIONS HORIZ: 1)88 _ 1P.99, S IS �O A QF O,G 2`0O ?. 1 TANGENT tiU �A a x'YOF Y TOP 25,00 7,38 Of CURB C29 53.36 25.00 mOJ%: AVE NOTESSEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION J 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING TREES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, HARDSCAPE, LAWNS, IRRIGATION SYSTEM, FENCE. WALLS, ETC., DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER OR CITY. ]a QF..aexAmlgg9AF, e _ z No. 34283 ,� �""b'pmu' A �r�rf OF CAl\FaQ�v lO REMOVE AND CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, 6" DEEP AS WITH TOP 2" THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARDS) OVERLAY 2O COLO WILL 2" THIGH MIN, EXISTING PAVEMENT SURFACE (D CONSTRUCT 2" THICK MIN. ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM) OVERLAY 4O CONSTRUCT 6" CURB & GUTTER, TYPE 'C-6' (W=18'), OVER 6' CMB PER CITY OF CWTA MESA STD, DWG, N0, 312 O CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PGO SIDEWALK OVER 4"' CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STD, DRAWING N0. 411 8O CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS STD. PIAN RSP ABBA 9O CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER PER CIN OF COSTA MESA STO, OWG NO 415 10 CON57RUCT DRIVEWAY APPROACH TYPE 1 PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO, DWG NO. 5" 15 RELOCATE EXISTING STREET SIGN i6 RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX 1B INSTALL WATER SERVICE AND METER PER MESA WATER DISTRICT STD DWO. 01 TRENCH DET PER CRY OF COSTA MESA STO. DWG, NO B13. SIZE PER L . PLAN 20 ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 22 ADJUST i0 GRADE EXISTING WATER VALVE 2J ADJUST i0 GRADE EXISTING WATER METER 2H REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXIST FENCE (AS NEEDED), COORDINATE WITH THE CIN PRIOR TO REMOVAL 29 INSTALL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PLAN J1 CONSTRUCT 6" DEEP A.0 WITH TOP 2' THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM) OVERLAY J6 INSTAL! SLEEVES AS SHOWN ON TH15 PLAN AND ON LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION PUNS (NUMBER AND SIZE OF SLEEVES PER PUNT REMOVAL NOTES 1❑ REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CURB & CURER 2� REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 3� REMOVE AND DISPOSE EX15TINC ROADWAY SECTION © REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK �7 REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB RAMP n REMOVE AND OISPDSE PORTION Of EXISTING CRO55-COTTER MATCH/JOIN EXISTING © PROTECT IN PUCE FULL DEPTH AC COLD MILL DA9PHALT RUBBER HOT MIX OVERIAY (ARHM) PARCEL CURVE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA C28 14,35 25,00 7,38 32'53'11" C29 53.36 25.00 45.38 122'1813" C30 51.68 25,00 41.97 118'26'00" C31 12.41 25.00 6.33 28'26'08" C32 12.29 2000. 6.34 35'12'03' C33 54.51 25.00 47.96 124'56'04" C311 5371 25.00 46,14 123'0816" C35 14.41 BEGS 7.41 33GV53" C36 12.63 25.00 6,45 28'56'48" C37 BAD 25.00 42.40 118'56'48" C38 51.82 25,00 42.24 118'45'51" C39 12.36 25,00 6.31 28'19'45" C40 14.48 25.00 J.45 33'1059" C41 53.60 25.00 45,89 122'50'05" C42 53.78 25.00 46.28 123'14'54' C43 1448 25.00 7,45 33'10'30" FULL DEPTH AC COLD MILL DA9PHALT RUBBER HOT MIX OVERIAY (ARHM) GRAPHIC SCALE 2000 IB 20 40 1 mch= 20R. EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 5 OF 32 19TH ST. AT SANTA ANA AND RAYMOND AVE. PLAN AND PROFILE PLAN NUMBER CITY OF COSTA MESA C-5 LINE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH DIRECTION L28 5.48 N49' 30' 44"W L29 2.02 N40' 39' 02'E L30 1.08 BAY 52' 20"E L31 824 N40' 18' 26'E L32 8.48 540' 38' 42"W L24 21.56 N40' 46' 32"E L25 5,51 S40' 39' 21'4 L27 RAE S40' 39' 21"E L43 21.47 N40' 38' DIE GRAPHIC SCALE 2000 IB 20 40 1 mch= 20R. EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 5 OF 32 19TH ST. AT SANTA ANA AND RAYMOND AVE. PLAN AND PROFILE PLAN NUMBER CITY OF COSTA MESA C-5 16: 1042 52.11 SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA C44 10.32 20.00 5.28 29'34'24' C45 52.11 SLY TOP m n or CURB 2500 41.45 112'48'22" C47 CL 8. °Cn/. 52$ C48 r:m: CL.OF IKA0 2500 2.58 33'45'20" C49 53.88 25.00 46.42 123'26'18' m Add ., _.. �a 10.57 �LIX 30'16'36' a. _ 90.. 25.00 7.52 90 C61 1 t¢s2 10.00 6.62 I n20. L4 OFI 90 1 14.63 25.00 2.53 33'3148" C63 15.91 A/4 A/4' o/ 3628'13" C64 Z.21T bI0X 12628'13" C65 11.05 500 9.94 _ C66 15.97 25.00 8.27 OC D .0 . O C 0 N s ^' _ 8 x.. a m m A/I Ala iA/A/A�0�� n 'siw m e- 4A om mem _ N CL 85.. m o y :- __. 85 85. am4� OR, _BUTACE Oct: ROAD ^e e rv_ _ 85. 11, TOP--._ OF CURB .NLY TOP aNC T3 AL _.. _A� OF CURB .5140 NLY TOPS. 16: 5• OC J4; 65' SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA C44 10.32 20.00 5.28 29'34'24' C45 52.11 SLY TOP m n or CURB 2500 41.45 112'48'22" C47 CL 8. 2500 6.18 52$ OF CURB _ 90 90 90 ,MEXIST GRADE B ROAD CL _ _ oLL SIT, s ,;tel TUSTIN AVE CALL RAVRzxe1 LOLL TREE C , CON.,oNW ML %'.A sass-wn ,BIT ....nLc-mmrs.ml ° AWNED CAIRNANABU sc aeL F..I�.IBAI WIN N, .l..LICENSE No. Uld'V- tt Nll um ALLEY NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION H -H AND 1-1 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING TREES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, HARDSCAPE LAWNS, IRRIGATION SYSTEM, FENCE, WALLS, ETC., DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER OR CITY. OI REMOVE PND CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, 6" DEEP AC WITH TOP 2' THICK ASPWV.i RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM) OVERLAY SO CONSTRUCT 8" CURB & GUTTER TYPE 'C-8" (W=24'), OVER 6" CMB PER CO, OF COSTA MESA STD DAG NO 312 O CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC SIDEWALK OVER 4" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STD DRAWING NO 411 BO CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS STD. PUN RSP ARIA 11 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY TYPE "C. PER SPPWC SM, PWI 110-2 13 CONSTRUCT LOCAL DEPRESSION PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STDOn,, NO. 315 l4 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN PER SPPWC STD PIAN 151-2, (MODIFIED) 1$ RELOCATE EXISTING STREET SIGN 16 RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX IB INSTALL WATER SERVICE ANO METER PER MESA WATER DISTRICT SID OWG 11 TRENCH DEC PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO DWG NO. 813, SIZE PER LS PIAN 22 ADJUST TO GRABS EXISTING WATER VALVE 28 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EAST FENCE (A6 NEEDED), COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO REMOVAL 29 INSTALL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PLAN 31 CONSTRUCT 6 DEEP A.C. WITH TOP 2" THICK ASPWLLT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARIA) OVERLAY 32 CONSTRUCT ALLEY INTERSECTION PER SPPWC STIT PLAN 130-2 J6 INSTALL SLEEVES AS SHOWN ON THIS PIAN AND ON LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION PLANS (NUMBER AND SIZE OF SLEEVES PER PIAN) REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CORE & CUTLER O REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY J� REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING ROADWAY SECTION © REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK �] REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB RAMP OPOKWN NOTE$ MATCH/JOIN EXISTING © PROTECT IN PLACE ASN&T RUBBER HOT MIX OVGtlAT GAR -M) CURVE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA C44 10.32 20.00 5.28 29'34'24' C45 52.11 25.00 42.80 m n FIN GRADROAD 2500 41.45 112'48'22" C47 CL 8. 2500 6.18 2746'58" C48 r:m: CL.OF IKA0 2500 2.58 33'45'20" C49 53.88 25.00 46.42 123'26'18' C50 52.42 25.00 4353 12015-32- �a 10.57 �LIX 30'16'36' a. 14.62 25.00 7.52 33'29"57" C61 H 10.00 6.62 67TI'45" " 14.63 25.00 2.53 33'3148" C63 15.91 25.00 &24 3628'13" C64 Z.21T bI0X 12628'13" C65 11.05 500 9.94 12635'57 C66 15.97 25.00 8.27 n �B ^ 0 N _ 20 m+b. m 3 __z 64x vz CL 85.. :- OR, _BUTACE Oct: ROAD t' u . w A _A� m -023.m 3m - 1591' 11 UP IJ.05 ]59]' j - - _ _____ ____-- _ 90 TC. oc oc oc : 90 sLrT °F CURD I a n m,P- a I. Ion _ ' o z a x11 ^wA 14211. 5386 _ Of, A. mq } m ' m } Nb _ 4 90 : 85 m ab mom. m020% m v m M, i35._ _ u atiA/ A/ wA/ ���' o _ b mK A _ z _ -_ mxa �R i o 3 m em n SCA LE m �o °-0 J6rm } r -- o Hoa¢ 1"=20 Jm zJOX RS vvRT 1 . TUSTIN AVE CALL RAVRzxe1 LOLL TREE C , CON.,oNW ML %'.A sass-wn ,BIT ....nLc-mmrs.ml ° AWNED CAIRNANABU sc aeL F..I�.IBAI WIN N, .l..LICENSE No. Uld'V- tt Nll um ALLEY NOTES: SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION H -H AND 1-1 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING TREES SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, HARDSCAPE LAWNS, IRRIGATION SYSTEM, FENCE, WALLS, ETC., DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER OR CITY. OI REMOVE PND CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, 6" DEEP AC WITH TOP 2' THICK ASPWV.i RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM) OVERLAY SO CONSTRUCT 8" CURB & GUTTER TYPE 'C-8" (W=24'), OVER 6" CMB PER CO, OF COSTA MESA STD DAG NO 312 O CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC SIDEWALK OVER 4" CMB PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STD DRAWING NO 411 BO CONSTRUCT CURB RAMP PER CALTRANS STD. PUN RSP ARIA 11 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY TYPE "C. PER SPPWC SM, PWI 110-2 13 CONSTRUCT LOCAL DEPRESSION PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STDOn,, NO. 315 l4 CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN PER SPPWC STD PIAN 151-2, (MODIFIED) 1$ RELOCATE EXISTING STREET SIGN 16 RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX IB INSTALL WATER SERVICE ANO METER PER MESA WATER DISTRICT SID OWG 11 TRENCH DEC PER CITY OF COSTA MESA STO DWG NO. 813, SIZE PER LS PIAN 22 ADJUST TO GRABS EXISTING WATER VALVE 28 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EAST FENCE (A6 NEEDED), COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO REMOVAL 29 INSTALL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PLAN 31 CONSTRUCT 6 DEEP A.C. WITH TOP 2" THICK ASPWLLT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARIA) OVERLAY 32 CONSTRUCT ALLEY INTERSECTION PER SPPWC STIT PLAN 130-2 J6 INSTALL SLEEVES AS SHOWN ON THIS PIAN AND ON LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION PLANS (NUMBER AND SIZE OF SLEEVES PER PIAN) REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CORE & CUTLER O REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY J� REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING ROADWAY SECTION © REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK �] REMOVE ANO DISPOSE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB RAMP OPOKWN NOTE$ MATCH/JOIN EXISTING © PROTECT IN PLACE ASN&T RUBBER HOT MIX OVGtlAT GAR -M) GRAPHIC SCALE I inch= 201 REVISIONS """" REFERENCES ' " PIHNNTE Amp epoE ESB)OW „D. DAIS pESp„p11pN ppp. DRAWN BY. 1 PROVED BY: Q VP , EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 6 32 SEE INDINW& SHEER V, GH AMI 6 yc RELOuuExDED BT: 015 REG. BY: - m 19TH ST. AT TUSTIN AVE & ALLEY DAIS OF CONSTRUCIMN � No. 34283 s AP IAR BEC. END PROVED TOO s Q. PLAN AND PROFILE N BER DAIS ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL 9tF, CIVM1 F�Q� C-6 8&TA2.Vi NEJA. ACTING CITY ENGINEER OF CA�� CITY OF COSTA MESA CURVE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA C44 10.32 20.00 5.28 29'34'24' C45 52.11 25.00 42.80 119'2508" GAB 51.40 2500 41.45 112'48'22" C47 12.12 2500 6.18 2746'58" C48 14,73 2500 2.58 33'45'20" C49 53.88 25.00 46.42 123'26'18' C50 52.42 25.00 4353 12015-32- 051 10.57 2000. 5.41 30'16'36' C60 14.62 25.00 7.52 33'29"57" C61 11.70 10.00 6.62 67TI'45" C62 14.63 25.00 2.53 33'3148" C63 15.91 25.00 &24 3628'13" C64 11.04 500 9.91 12628'13" C65 11.05 500 9.94 12635'57 C66 15.97 25.00 8.27 36'355Y GRAPHIC SCALE I inch= 201 REVISIONS """" REFERENCES ' " PIHNNTE Amp epoE ESB)OW „D. DAIS pESp„p11pN ppp. DRAWN BY. 1 PROVED BY: Q VP , EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 6 32 SEE INDINW& SHEER V, GH AMI 6 yc RELOuuExDED BT: 015 REG. BY: - m 19TH ST. AT TUSTIN AVE & ALLEY DAIS OF CONSTRUCIMN � No. 34283 s AP IAR BEC. END PROVED TOO s Q. PLAN AND PROFILE N BER DAIS ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL 9tF, CIVM1 F�Q� C-6 8&TA2.Vi NEJA. ACTING CITY ENGINEER OF CA�� CITY OF COSTA MESA LINE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH DIRECTION L33 598 N40' 31' 33"E L34 NOE NAT 37' 211 L35 585 SAW 22' 14'E 136 8.19 N40' 36' 46"E L37 574 1140' 46 Q'E L55 12.58 N40' 38" 23"E L56 12.59 N40' 38" 23"E GRAPHIC SCALE I inch= 201 REVISIONS """" REFERENCES ' " PIHNNTE Amp epoE ESB)OW „D. DAIS pESp„p11pN ppp. DRAWN BY. 1 PROVED BY: Q VP , EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 6 32 SEE INDINW& SHEER V, GH AMI 6 yc RELOuuExDED BT: 015 REG. BY: - m 19TH ST. AT TUSTIN AVE & ALLEY DAIS OF CONSTRUCIMN � No. 34283 s AP IAR BEC. END PROVED TOO s Q. PLAN AND PROFILE N BER DAIS ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL 9tF, CIVM1 F�Q� C-6 8&TA2.Vi NEJA. ACTING CITY ENGINEER OF CA�� CITY OF COSTA MESA SCALE HORIZ: 1"=: u e u u IO REMOVE AND CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, 6" DEEP AC WITH TOP 2" THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHMJ OVERLAY © CONSTRUCT 8" MEDIAN CURB, PER SPPWC STO PLAN 120-2, AI -8(200) 18 INSTALL WATER SERVICE AND METER PER MESA WATER DISTRICT STD. DW¢ pl TRENCH NET PER CRY OF COSTA MESA STD. ORD, N0. 813, S12E PER L3, PLAN 29 INSTALL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PIAN 39 INSTALL t PE E TRAFFIC LOOP PER CALTRANS STD PIAN ES -5B 36 INSTALL SLEEVES AS SHOWN ON THIS PIAN AND ON LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION PLANS (NUMBER AND SIZE OF SLEEVES PER PLAN) CURVE DATA CALL LENGTH RADIUS ..R pPrvE TOLL FREE C58 paN01FNnE.... x1E. LA1 0 NLLWwW,Px�—IDu11LE.LW. INFINITY 180'00'00" ,A% +BHB) SB5—ON3 I 11.46 165'05'01" = ma nm suewsEx. c¢¢xsE uo. Call „_.".. SCALE HORIZ: 1"=: u e u u IO REMOVE AND CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE AC SLOT PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH, 6" DEEP AC WITH TOP 2" THICK ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHMJ OVERLAY © CONSTRUCT 8" MEDIAN CURB, PER SPPWC STO PLAN 120-2, AI -8(200) 18 INSTALL WATER SERVICE AND METER PER MESA WATER DISTRICT STD. DW¢ pl TRENCH NET PER CRY OF COSTA MESA STD. ORD, N0. 813, S12E PER L3, PLAN 29 INSTALL IRRIGATION CONTROLLER PER LANDSCAPE PIAN 39 INSTALL t PE E TRAFFIC LOOP PER CALTRANS STD PIAN ES -5B 36 INSTALL SLEEVES AS SHOWN ON THIS PIAN AND ON LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION PLANS (NUMBER AND SIZE OF SLEEVES PER PLAN) CURVE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA C58 9,42 3.00 INFINITY 180'00'00" C59 4.32 1.50 11.46 165'05'01" CEO 11.72 45,00 5.89 14'54'59" LINE DATA SEGMENT LENGTH DIRECITON L49 18.54 N49' 20' 50"W L50 35.50 549' 20' 50'E L51 5.96 N34' 25' 52"W SEE SHEET 2 FOR SECTION G—G Nu DEPTH Ac COLD MILL ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX WEHIAY HHM) GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 I inch= 20 ft. REVISIONS REFERENCES """ L "`"`xx` 1Al N0. DATE DESCflIPnON APP. SEE INDiNDUAL SHEEiS we cols s][Nx snwr0 we sols QOM O HEA M/0 !F DRANK BT' APPROVED BY. a "" EAST 19TH STREET TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 7 OF 32 RECOMMENDED By. s REL. BY: .� P �' Ne. 34283 IRVINE AVENUE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION��. PLAN AND PROFILE U BEGIN END APPROVED BY. �f �P NDMBER DATE ALLEPRD BY CITY LWNq`9lF°`"`"�Q� CITY OF COSTA MESA C - 7 BALTAZAft MEAN, qTY ENgNEER F.C.E. 65033D NB -1- Additional Documents Community Based Transit Circulators N13-1 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ART COSTA MESA LINE Ridership May 2015 -December 2015 Date Date Ridership Date Ridership Date Ridership Date Ridership Date Ridership Date Ridership Date Ridership 05/05/2015 4 06/01/2015 0 07/01/2015 13 08/01/2015 3 09/01/2015 4 10/01/2015 6 12/01/2015 16 05/06/2015 0 06/02/2015 0 07/02/2015 1 08/02/2015 23 09/02/2015 10 10/02/2015 9 11/02/2015 3 12/02/2015 0 05/07/2015 5 06/03/2015 0 07/03/2015 21 08/03/2015 6 09/03/2015 14 10/03/2015 3 11/03/2015 6 12/03/2015 11 05/08/2015 5 06/04/2015 0 07/04/2015 16 08/04/2015 6 09/04/2015 0 10/04/2015 0 11/04/2015 0 12/04/2015 12 05/09/2015 7 06/05/2015 0 07/05/2015 11 08/05/2015 15 09/05/2015 15 10/05/2015 13 11/05/2015 16 12/05/2015 12 05/10/2015 0 06/06/2015 0 07/06/2015 25 08/06/2015 20 09/06/2015 10 10/06/2015 4 11/06/2015 18 12/06/2015 7 05/11/2015 0 06/07/2015 0 07/07/2015 12 08/07/2015 31 09/07/2015 19 10/07/2015 0 11/07/2015 19 12/07/2015 6 05/12/2015 2 06/08/2015 0 07/08/2015 16 08/08/2015 2 09/08/2015 0 10/08/2015 1 11/08/2015 1 12/08/2015 3 05/13/2015 3 06/09/2015 0 07/09/2015 23 08/09/2015 6 09/09/2015 12 10/09/2015 0 11/09/2015 0 12/09/2015 7 05/14/2015 2 06/10/2015 0 07/10/2015 8 08/10/2015 11 09/10/2015 15 10/10/2015 0 11/10/2015 1 12/10/2015 10 05/15/2015 2 06/11/2015 14 07/11/2015 21 08/11/2015 12 09/11/2015 21 10/11/2015 6 11/11/2015 4 12/11/2015 2 05/16/2015 2 06/12/2015 0 07/12/2015 8 08/12/2015 15 09/12/2015 22 10/12/2015 13 11/12/2015 0 12/12/2015 2 05/17/2015 1 06/13/2015 19 07/13/2015 22 08/13/2015 14 09/13/2015 28 10/13/2015 0 11/13/2015 2 12/13/2015 2 05/18/2015 2 06/14/2015 7 07/14/2015 17 08/14/2015 30 09/14/2015 3 10/14/2015 3 11/14/2015 2 12/14/2015 5 05/19/2015 2 06/15/2015 5 07/15/2015 10 08/15/2015 16 09/15/2015 0 10/15/2015 3 11/15/2015 0 12/15/2015 4 05/20/2015 0 06/16/2015 2 07/16/2015 25 08/16/2015 15 09/16/2015 25 10/16/2015 4 11/16/2015 43 12/16/2015 50 05/21/2015 0 06/17/2015 8 07/17/2015 25 08/17/2015 11 09/17/2015 2 10/17/2015 11 11/17/2015 7 12/17/2015 2 05/22/2015 6 06/18/2015 8 07/18/2015 32 08/18/2015 9 09/18/2015 9 10/18/2015 2 11/18/2015 0 12/18/2015 3 05/23/2015 2 06/19/2015 0 07/19/2015 6 08/19/2015 10 09/19/2015 2 10/19/2015 0 11/19/2015 2 12/19/2015 4 05/24/2015 0 06/20/2015 2 07/20/2015 22 08/20/2015 8 09/20/2015 0 10/20/2015 10 11/20/2015 0 12/20/2015 14 05/25/2015 4 06/21/2015 0 07/21/2015 13 08/21/2015 12 09/21/2015 0 10/21/2015 1 11/21/2015 2 12/21/2015 15 05/26/2015 9 06/22/2015 4 07/22/2015 14 08/22/2015 16 09/22/2015 6 10/22/2015 2 11/22/2015 33 12/22/2015 22 05/27/2015 1 06/23/2015 1 07/23/2015 24 08/23/2015 12 09/23/2015 0 10/23/2015 3 11/23/2015 37 12/23/2015 24 05/28/2015 7 06/24/2015 2 07/24/2015 25 08/24/2015 2 09/24/2015 2 10/24/2015 6 11/24/2015 3 12/24/2015 25 05/29/2015 2 06/25/2015 30 07/25/2015 9 08/25/2015 9 09/25/2015 7 10/25/2015 5 11/25/2015 0 12/25/2015 12 05/30/2015 1 06/26/2015 7 07/26/2015 19 08/26/2015 11 09/26/2015 0 10/26/2015 2 11/26/2015 0 12/26/2015 3 .05/31/2015 2 06/27/2015 34 07/27/2015 13 08/27/2015 15 09/27/2015 1 10/27/2015 3 11/27/2015 0 12/27/2015 19 06/28/2015 11 07/28/2015 3 08/28/2015 12 09/28/2015 23 10/28/2015 9 11/28/2015 44 12/28/2015 56 06/29/2015 0 07/29/2015 17 08/29/2015 15 09/29/2015 2 10/29/2015 5 11/29/2015 3 12/29/2015 12 06/30/2015 10 07/30/2015 5 08/30/2015. 13 09/30/2015 0 10/30/2015 16 11/30/2015 3 12/30/2015 0 07/31/2015 08/31/2015 10 10/31/2015 7 12/31/2015 2 TOTAL MAY 71 JUNE 164 JULY 476 AUGUST 390 SEPTEMBER 252 OCTOBER 147 NOVEMBER 249 DECEMBER 362 1st Quarter FY35-16 2nd Quarter MS -16 FY14-15 PERIOD RIDERS RIDER/MO RIDER/DAY ART Costa Mesa Line FY14-15 (2 mo) 235 117.50 3.85 Ridership May 2015 -December 2015 5DD FY15-16 (6 mo) 1876 312.67 10.20 450 400 Total (first 8 mo) 2111 263.88 8.62 350 300 250 200 150 10so 0 May lune July August September October November December 2,111 2016 Ridership Data Row Labels Sum of Quantity Jan 83 Feb 63 Mar 351 Apr 103 May 110 Jun 82 Jul 934 Aug 2220 Sep 643 Oct 1084 Nov 862 Dec 851 Grand Total 7386 NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS Termination of Planning Commission Member TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Item NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: Make America Great [mailto:gibbyschley@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 5:21 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Item NB -2 Attention City Council Members, Please keep the Planning Commission as is. The Council voted 5-0 to accept the results at the February 7th meeting. Removing Stephan Andranian will be a disservice to Costa Mesa. He is the only Commissioner on that panel with experience and knowledge of ongoing and current business. appreciate your consideration to VOTE NO and leave the Planning Commission as is. Thank you in advance! Mr. Schley TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Vote No on NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: Steve Metro [mailto:steve@otdonuts.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 5:18 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Vote No on NB -2 To whom it may concern, I am writing to express my support for Stephan Andranian and to urge the city council to vote NO on Sandy Genis's proposal. support Stephan as a member of the planning commission and believe him to be fully qualified and appropriate for the position. Again, please vote no on Item NB -2. Thank you, Steve Metro Owner Oh Those Donuts 1734 Newport BI. Costa Mesa, CA 92627 (949) 646-2402 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: Fw: Item NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: jennye Bigelow[mailto:sweetliljennye@gmail.comj Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 5:11 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Item NB -2 Dear Costa Mesa City Council, Putting a halt to all hearings, ostensibly to take a look at the ordinances, and then doing nothing for more than two months is absolutely unacceptable. Then, to waste more time on a political putsch... The big upside to the putsch is that we ended up with a very impressive planning commission, which will be able to comprehensively address the issues, it'll just take a little additional time to get up to speed. With Stephan on board to provide his experience and perspectives, that process will be accelerated. The goal is to move forward on all of these important issues, and each and every one of the current planning commissioners are very well-equipped to do just that. We look forward to watching them in action, and sincerely hope Mayor Pro Tem Sandy Genis does not compound her earlier mistakes and further gum up the process. Sincerely, Ms Bigelow Costa Mesa Resident TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: Item Nb -2 - Stephan Andranian - Planning Commission ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 -----Original Message ----- From: Diana Olson [mailto:dianalolsonl@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 5:39 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Item Nb -2 - Stephan Andranian - Planning Commission City Clerk: please include this email in all council packets To all Council Members and Mayor Foley: This change of council has already created my children upheaval in our City, from releasing all committee and commission members regardless of when their term expired was petty and vindictive. Please do not let another delay in City business happen because one member was confused on the voting. I'm sorry but you only get one chance to vote. If this vote was so meaningful, all council members should have paid close attention to the rules. Stephan Andranian is good for Costa Mesa. He knows the challenges we face and is a tremendous addition to the planning commission. Please vote no for the removal of Stephan Andranian. Thank you, Longtime Costa Mesa resident. Diana Olson 949-701-5246 1741 Tustin Ave Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Sent from my Fad TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Item NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: Joshua Couch [mailto:joshua.j.couch@gmail.comj Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 6:03 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Item NB -2 Hello, I'm urging you to vote NO on Sandy Genis's proposal to release Stephan Andranian from the Planning Commission (item NB -2). It reflects poorly on Sandy Genis that she submitted a vote in a process that she didn't understand, a process that affected more people than just herself. It's also concerning that we are taking the valuable time of the Council to hear "do -over" requests. It is amateurish and not a great start for the newly elected majority. Mr. Andranian has done an excellent job so far and should be given the chance to finish out the term for which he was re -appointed. It is not his fault that Ms. Genis neglected to give her full attention to the details of the nomination process. Thank you for your consideration, Joshua Couch TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Item NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: Nic Cosso [mailto:tyme2srf@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:51 AM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Item NB -2 To whom it may concern, My name is Nic Cosso and have been a resident in Costa Mesa for the last 6 years. I have known Mr. Andranian during that time and I can say without a doubt his ethics, dedication to the City of Costa Mesa as well as to his friends and family are exemplary. It has come to my attention that Mayor Pro -Tem Genis is moving to have Mr. Andranian removed from the City Planning Commission. Her reasoning is quite frankly ridiculous and as far as I'm concerned I find her tactics underhanded as well as morally and ethically irresponsible. He was elected fair and square and she simply doesn't want him on the Commission so she is grasping for straws to do anything to have him removed. If anyone should be removed it should be her. I feel Mr. Andranian is a perfect fit for the position and that he should remain in his position. I urge you and the council to vote NO on Mayor Genis' proposal. Very best regards, Nic Cosso 234 Virginia PI Costa Mesa, Ca. 92627 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Item NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: John Shannon[mailto:johnpcshannon@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 3:19 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Item NB -2 Dear Costa Mesa Council Member, I would like to recommend that you vote "No" to Item NB -2; removing Stephan Andranian from the planning commission. I have ]mown Stephan for over ten years, and have always known him to be an advocate for the Costa Mesa community. He has served on the planning commission for almost 2 years and his experience is invaluable in such a short tenure. Stephan is a local man who is raising a family in the community, therefore; will always have the long term community interest in his decisions. We look forward to learning if you will put political interests before community. Sincerely, John P. Shannon C:949-201-5675 Costa Mesa resident for 26 years. TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: I request a no vote on SB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: Lee Hernandez [mailto:leehernandezl@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 4:30 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: I request a no vote on SB -2 Greetings, As a life long Costa Mesa resident I urged the council to strike down Sandy Genis's proposal. NB -2 sounds like a fishy situation and I don't feel that it has been vetted properly. Please vote down SB -2. Thanks, Lee Hernandez 2419 Miseno Way Costa Mesa, CA 92627 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Vote no on Item NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR N13-2 From: Jessica Palanjian [mailto:Jessica@grandprixperformance.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 4:37 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Vote no on Item NB -2 To whom it may concern, I am writing to express my support for Stephan Andranian and to urge the city council to vote NO on Sandy Genis's proposal. I support Stephan as a member of the planning commission and believe him to be fully qualified and appropriate for the position. Again, please vote no on Item NB -2. Thank you, Jessica Rankin Vice President, Grand Prix Performance 1718 Newport Blvd. Costa Mesa, CA 92627 949.645.7022 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Please vote no on Item NB -2 From: Jerry Palanjian [mailto:Jerry@grandprixperformance.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 4:45 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Please vote no on Item NB -2 To whom it may concern, I am writing to express my support for Stephan Andranian and to urge the city council to vote NO on Sandy Genis's proposal. We have had the pleasure of knowing Mr. Andranian and his parents for many years and have always known them to be reputable people. We wholeheartedly support Stephan as a member of the planning commission and believe him to be fully qualified and appropriate for the position. Again, please vote no on Item NB -2. Thank you, Jerry Palanjian President, Grand Prix Performance 1718 Newport Blvd. Costa Mesa, CA 92627 949.645.7022 1 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Please vote no on Item NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: Ryan Abbey [mailto:ryanabbey5@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 5:08 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Please vote no on Item NB -2 To whom it may concern, I am writing to support Stephan Andranian and ask the city council to vote NO on Sandy Gems's proposal. I fully support Stephan as a member of the planning commission. Again, please vote no on Item NB -2. Sincerely, Ryan Abbey 167 Cabrillo St Costa Mesa, CA 92627 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: please vote no on NB -2 c �� i � l �; •' S From: harrybarsegian@yahoo.com [mailto:harrybarsegian@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 5:06 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: please vote no on NB -2 To whom it may concern, I support Stephan Andranian and am writing to urge the city council to vote NO on Sandy Genis's proposal. Please vote no on Item NB -2. Thank you, Harry Barseghian, Costa Mesa Resident 263 Costa Mesa Street Costa Mesa, CA 92627 1 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Item NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: Katherine Shannon [mailto:katherinemshannon@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 4:59 AM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Item NB -2 Dear Costa Mesa Council Member, I would like to recommend that you vote "No" to Item NB -2; removing Stephan Andranian from the planning commission. I have known Stephan for over ten years, and have always known him to be an advocate for the Costa Mesa community. He has served on the planning commission for almost 2 years and his experience is invaluable in such a short tenure. Stephan is a local man who is raising a family in the community, therefore; will always have the long term community interest in his decisions. We look forward to learning if you will put political interests before community. Sincerely, Katherine Shannon Costa Mesa Resident for over 25 years Cell Number: 949.338.7094 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: removal of planning commissioner ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR N13-2 From: Jim Fisler [mailto:i.fisler@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 8:43 AM To: FOLEY, KATRINA <KATRINA.FOLEY@costamesaca.eov> Cc: GENTS, SANDRA <SANDRA.GENIS@costamesaca.aov>; RIGHEIMER, JIM<JIM.RIGHEIMER@costamesaca.eov>; GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.green@costa mesa ca.gov>; STEPHENS, JOHN <10HN.STEPHENS@costamesaca.eov> Subject: removal of planning commissioner Firing all the commissioners was a bad first move. Unprecedented but with the next power shift expect the same back at ya, perpetuating a total mess. Whatever happened to "institutional knowledge" claims? Hiding the applications of those who did not make "the cut' is another bad move. Lack of transparency. Hiding something? More sunshine needed for the council. The multiplier in the formula was a power grab. Gives too much weight to the majority. Remove the multiplier in scoring votes. Scores of 3-2-2 get 21 while 5-5 get 20 and lose even though without the multiplier they would win 10-71 If you are going to remove anyone, remove the late entry for planning commission. She should not have been considered. Firing all the committees except one you like the makeup of already was another bad move. Thank you for any common sense going forward. Bad start. Time to rally and act like you have been there before. Only John has an excuse of no prior service on commissions or council and yet he is correct in calling the vote a "righteous" one. Move on. Regards, Jim Fisler Broker/Associate Torelli Realty lim@iimfisler.com www.jimfisler.com Tel. 714.423.4351 BRE#01392810 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: TERMINATION OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR N13-2 From: Andrew Smith [mailto:andv@avpac.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 9:13 AM To: GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.areen(@costamesaca.aov> Subject: TERMINATION OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER Brenda, Can you please share the following with Council as respects TERMINATION OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER? Dear Mayor and City Council Members. I have two comments to offer re: the captioned item from tonight's Council Meeting Agenda: 1) 1 encourage the Council to reject Council Member Genis's request. The voting methodology and instructions were clearly printed on the ballot and Council Member Genis had a responsibility to read and to follow them. Further, recasting her votes after learning of the other Council Member's choices and the subsequent outcome is unfair to the remaining Council Members who cast a Ballot consistent with the Brown Act. 2) If there is to be a recasting on any ballot, there should be a re -casting of every ballot so that no one Council Member's has the advantage of knowing the other Member's choices, at least as respects the Brown Act. I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the process. Warm Regards, Andy Andrew B. Smith 1978 Tustin Ave Costa Mesa, CA 92627 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Stephan Andranian; Planning Commission ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR N13-2 From: KristinaMarie Bogner [mailto:kmkboener@amail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 9:29 AM To: GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.ereen@costa mesaca.aov> Subject: re: Stephan Andranian; Planning Commission Good morning Ms. Green, I am writing to you today in support of Commissioner Andranian. I was disappointed to see that it has been agendized to remove Mr. Andranian from his appointment to Planning Commission. Although I realize that Ms. Genis admits she made an error, it just seems like this decision would not be in the best interests of the community. Mr. Andranian has an immense amount of experience and from what I have witnessed, has been extremely fair and professional. The city's business has already been on hold for too long and we need to be able to move on and conduct business, as -needed. I would imagine there is quite a learning curve for all of these new commissioners and I would venture to guess that they, too, would appreciate the continuity. I sincerely hope that Mr. Andranian is able to maintain his current position as a Planning Commission; and as the Chairman, as I believe it is in the city's best interest to proceed with important business that needs to be addressed. Thank you for the opportunity to share my thoughts. Sincerely, Kristina M. Bogner "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." -- Margaret Mead TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: PRR# 115 (Spadoni) Attachments: PRR #115 (Spadoni).pdf; copier.ricoh@costamesaca.gov_20170216_091021.pdf ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: GREEN, BRENDA Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 9:42 AM To: TRAYLOR, MARIAN <MARIAN.TRAYLOR@costamesaca.gov> Subject: FW: PRR# 115 (Spadoni) Please include in red folders, thank you. Brenda Green City Clerk City of Costa Mesa 714/754-5221 From: HATCH, THOMAS Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 4:23 PM To:'maryatsis@aol.com' <maryatsis@aol.com>; GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.areen@costamesaca.gov> Subject: FW: PRR# 115 (Spadoni) Hello Mary, I received and read your email. I am also forwarding the email to Brenda Green to process your attached public records request. Please let me know if you want me to share this with the City Council. Thank you and have a good weekend. Tom From: Mary Spadoni [mailto:marvatsis@aol.com] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 4:11 PM To: HATCH, THOMAS <THOMAS.HATCH @costamesaca.Rov> Subject: Fwd: PRR# 115 (Spadoni) February 17, 2017 Mr. Thomas Hatch, City Manager City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Dear Mr. Hatch: I would like to expand on my letter of February 10t1i outlining the irregularities in the policy and procedure used for the Planning Commission appointments. There are four areas of major concern in relation to the legality and equity of these appointments. My request for public information on voting ballots, application of Carla Navarro Woods and any staff or council communication with Mrs. Woods, which are attached to this letter. 1) The ballots provided show that Councilmen Righeirner and Mansoor had ballots different from the other Council members Stephens and Genis and Mayor Foley. According to Policy 000-2.5 l.d. states that: "...nominations of persons to be appointed to each commission to be voted on by the entire council." Candidate Carla Navarro Woods was not listed on Righeimer's and Mansoor's ballots 2) The first paragraph of the city of Costa Mesa's Council Policy Policy 000-2.5, procedure and policy for Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission reads: "...appointments to each of these commission is by majority vote." The submitted ballots clearly show that Candidate Kerins and Andranian, did not, in fact receive majority council vote. The point system used did not take into account the majority vote policy. 3) The published Agenda, and Updated Agenda listed the voting order as: Parks and Recreation, Planning Commission and Senior Commission. Instead the vote was taken out of order, switching, voting on Planning Commission prior to Parks and Recreation. A candidate for both that was appointed to Parks and Recreation would be ineligible for Planning Commission. 4) The attached public information sheet, lists policy and procedure as determined by city manager. It clearly outlines the procedure, deadlines and dates. There are several deviations from this policy: a) Mrs. Navarro Woods applied for Parks and Recreation only. She was selected for an interview for Parks and Recreation Commission on January 14th. b) Planning Commission interviews were held January 31st. Several days after this, on February 3rd, at 4:27 p.m., an email was received by the city clerk from Mrs. Navarro Woods requesting to be considered for the Planning Commission. c) Her request carne less than 72 hours before the February 7, council meeting, which did not allow the required amount of time for proper notice. The amended city agenda did not include her among the candidates pool. The first time any resident heard her name in association with the Planning Commission was when she was announced as appointed. Best Regards, Mary Spadom Costa Mesa PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST The City of Costa Mesa is committed to open and transparent government. The City responsible for the care and custody of all official records for the City of Costa Mesa, prompt and efficient access to public records to the citizens it serves. FOR OF rQf sE 4$MLY iw CITY CL .;lerk's'Office is and strives to provide In accordance with the California Public Records Act (California Government Code § 6250 at.seq.), the City has ten (10) calendar days (excluding after hours submissions, and when City Hail is closed on weekends and holidays) to respond, once your request is received. Some records may not be subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act, however you will be notified either way. If the City determines that the documents you have requested are subject to disclosure, you will be notified of any cost associated with production and a date they will be ready for viewing. PLEASE NOTE: Generally, costs for black and white 81/2" x 11" are ten (10) cents per page, as well as electronic documents if the record must be scanned. Fees vary for Fire Incident reports, as well as other types of documents. Police Reports may be obtained directly at the Police Department. _.._....._.._.._........._........._.._.. ..._.......s................,.. PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Name:Arl >�F} Daytime Phone Number: Mailing Address--7-- City: Email Address: State: Zip Code: ') '�2 .-1d & - L -d- % A PLEASE E-MAIL XWILL PICKUP ❑ PLEASE MAIL PLEASE DESCRIBE THE NATURE OF THE DOCUMENTS YOU ARE REQUESTING AND PLEASE BE AS SPECIFIC AS POSSIBLE: 91 'lam'/w G l--/ 1 c C /n -- C� 0 A0 %�— 0 �/9".x/!✓9 IV c..v 7'i'� /h / $ S d1.. Cgsh✓Lr-S �cxCle L �yr4 !moo o �h vE? y�� C -t `'`� rru. O Signature ti Date CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY SUBJECT POLICY EFFECTIVE RAGE NUMBER 'DATE PLANNING COMMISSION AND 3/3/03 1 of 3 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 000-2.5 REV: 12/13/04 BACKGROUND The City Council has changed the method it uses to appoint the members of the Planning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission so that appointments to each of these commissions is by majority vote. The persons appointed serve at the pleasure of the City Council. The commissioners' terms are for four years except that initial appointments under Ordinance number 04-17 for two of the Planning Commissioners and two of the Parks and Recreation Commissioners, chosen randomly, shall be for two years in order to have staggered terms. PURPOSE To establish certain procedures governing the appointment of Planning and Parks and Recreation commissioners and related matters. PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES A000intments a. The City Manager will put on the City Council agenda for the second regular City Council meeting In January following each General Election the matter of appointment of commissioners for the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission. Appointments will be needed to fill any vacancies caused by the expiration of commission member terms. b. The City Manager will give advance notice of the calendaring of this matter to the Council Members. c. Prior to the scheduled Council meeting, the City Manager will also cause public notice to be given of the number and type of commission appointments to be made and invite any Interested persons to submit to his office their name, resume, and statement of interest in the commission appointment desired. All such applications received will be supplied to the Council Members. d. At the scheduled Council meeting when this matter Is called for consideration, each Council Member may make nominations of persons to be appointed to each commission to be voted on by the entire council. 37 (CmmnHndbk)Ctyivlgr Revkcd: 2012 2. Qualifications a. Commissioners must be residents and qualified electors of the City, The City Clerk shall verify that applicants satisfy these qualifications. b. No commissioner shall be a regular, full4iime employee of the City, nor a Council Member. c, The Council Members shall select their nominee(s) based on the individual Council Member's Judgment that his or her nominee(s) are the best qualified persons for these commissions. d. The appointments shall be from among persons who have submitted applications. 3,. Terms a, Each commissioner will serve a term of four years except that upon initial appointment following adoption of this Policy Revision and Ordinance Number 04-17, two members of each commission, selected at random, shall serve a term of two years. b. Notwithstanding subdivision 3,a above, a commissioner will continue to serve until a replacement commissioner has been appointed and qualified. c. A commissioner's term shall automatically terminate upon his or her ceasing to be qualified under section 2 above. 4. Rem va a. A Council Member may request consideration of removal of a Commissioner by placing the removal on a Council agenda. b. When this matter is called for consideration, The City Council may remove any member of either commission by majority vote. 5. Compensation Compensation for the commissioners will be set from time to time by City Council resolution. 6. Absences The provisions in Costa Mesa Municipal Code, section 13-10(d) and (e) describing excusable absences and absences resulting in termination of office shall govern both Planning and Parks and Recreation commissioners. An absence without cause from three consecutive meetings shall automatically end a commissioner's term of office, 33 (Commt bIdbk)CtyMgr Revised: 2Ot2 Additional Policies Except as provided in this policy, the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission shall be guided by the policies set forth in the Commissions[Commlttees/Boards Handbook. In case of any inconsistencies between this policy and the Handbook, the provisions in this policy shall govern these commissions. The Handbook includes material on such items as: • Agenda/Minutes • Attendance Requirements • Brown Act Requirements • Compensation • Conflict of Interest • Formal Communication with City Council • Legislative Activity • Oath of Allegiance • Staff Lialson Roles • Travel and Expense Policy 39 (ComjnHndbk)C[yMgr Revised: 2012 PLANNING COMMISSION 1 2 S Stephan Bron Sarah y Mark Robert Teti resa N $usar. J K Jeffrey Daniel Jay - l M N p Isabell Jef Jenna P p R 5 T 3 Antl2nian tle Ardkal Bn14 Buchznan Qck50n Calla Olin GOr¢ales Harb-n Hoitman� Humph ben Ma ,Kenna Maher Inane Wththia .brwhan Cada Jon Zidn Navarm Wads 4 Mo or Fol 5 6 MayoPnaTonnGenis " 5 Counvf Member Mansoor 9 t0 Couail Member R hekner 11 12 Counml Memher5te hens 21 22 Total Pomis 0 U U 0 0 a 0 ll 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 a 0 a 25 NupYler of SVetti0ns 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 26 Grana Total 0 0 0 o 11 0 0 a 2] Points mule (edb Number Of Sekc0ans 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 29 1. Councl Memher 2nk Nelrseletlipns 5-1 (5 being highest score/ 30 2 PmMe to City Clerk 3i 3. Cit Cled tabulates PLANNING COMMISSION A B 1 Stephan C 0 E Byron Saah Mark F G i7b Teresa H Susan 1 J,iirey J 0.11 K Jay L M N Isabel) ]eR Jean. G P Q q S T 2 Aodranian 3 de Arakal Borg Buchman pick,, CaRo Drain GOrttafes Hadm Hoffna Hum mev Ma Kerins Maffi. To pan Wod i tan Jorradlan Zkh C.H. Na .no WOOda 4 MaynrFole 5 6 Woo, P, Ti,, Gerais 1 8 Courxil Member Mansour 9 10 Council Member F' heimer 11 12 CouncJ Member Ste hers 21 Total Points p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q 24 Number Of Seleaions 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 p A Grand Tore[ 0 0 0 0 q 2t Poinls mWO fled by Numberof SelecUorts 0 0 0 0 0 0 q q 0 0 0 p 0 28 0 29 1. Counp Mem W_rrank Iheir selecdons 5-1(5 being highest score) 30 2. Provide to City Cie* 3t 3. Ci Clerk tabulate; PLANNING COMMISSION 1 2 3 A A Mayor Foley B Stephan Ardranian C Byron de Arakal D Sarah Bortz E Mark Buchanan F Robert Dickson G Teresa Callo Drain H Susan Gonzales I Jeffrey Harlan J Daniel Hoffmann K Ja Humphrey L Mayer Kerns M Mathews N 7oune O Worthington on P Jonathan 5 6 M r Pro Tem Genis ' 6 9 Council Member Mansour 10 Council Member R- heimer To� 12 Council Member Ste hens 13 15 14 16 TS 19 Total Points 0 0 Number of Selections 0 0 0 0 Grand Total `.. --.. tl - 0 .. p ; - 0 (Points multiplied b Nu 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0. 0 _ 0 0 0 _ _.0 0 0 0 0 : 0 -- .... 01 - 01 0 0 0 0 - 0 20 21 22 1. Council Member rank their seledions 5-1 (5 being highest score) 2. Provide to City Clerk 23 3_ City Clerk tabulates ( \ I v 1 `(—Ar„`U�,— PLANNING COMMISSION 1 A B C D E F G H I J K L 2 Stephan Andranian Byron de Arakal Sarah Bortz Mark Buchanan Robert Dickson Teresa Callo Drain Susan Jeffrey Daniel Jay Isabell 3 Gonzales Harlan Hoffmann Humphrey Mayor Kerins 4 Mayor Foley 5 6 Ma f Pro Tem Genis 7 8 Council Member Mansoor 9 10 Council Member Ri heimer 11 12 Council Member Stephens 13 14 Total Points ° ° ° ° 0 0 15 0 0 0 p 0 16 Number of Selections 0 0 0 00 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Grand Total 01 01 01 01 ol 01 0 0 19 nts Poimulti lied b Number of Selections 0 0 p 20 21 1. Council Member rank their selections 5 -1 (5 being highest score) 22 2. Provide to City Clerk 23 3. City Clerk tabulates PLANNING COMMISSION A 6 1 Sterylan --C--T- E Byrorz Sarah F,tark F G H J K Robert Terua Sawn Je l Daniel Jap L M N O Isabetl p p R B T 2 Mdranian delvakal Ba¢ Buchanan Dickson CAIODrain Gonzales HM. Hoffmann Jlf Jenna Dan Jonaman Carla 3 Hum re N aKains Wil, s Tmde WOn14 ton Zi Nar mWoods a rzr Fal s 6 Ma or Pro Tem Gans T 8 COunul Member Mansoar 9 10 C U,il Member Rih,imw 11 12 Council Member Sle hens Z S 21 Total Poin�s 0 � C 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Number gSe�ectbns 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p 26 Grantl Tgal 0 d 0 0 0 21 'POmt5 mu10 edb Numberg5electians 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 6 26 0 0 0 10 1. COuna Member rank Nair seleG ans 5 -1 (5 being highest score) 302.p Vde t0 City Sleek 31 3. Ci Clerk hbulates ***io submit form via e-mail, please save application, fill in, and send to cityclerk@costamesaca.gov. City of Costa Mesa Application for Commission Appointment All information an this page only, is considered public information and will be released to the public, including being posted on the City's website. APPLICANTS FOR THE PARKS AND RECREATION AND PLANNING COMMISSIONS MUST BE A COSTA MESA RESIDENT AND REGISTERED TO VOTE. Name: t. arto, Nay6trro 1. ood,v Indicate the name of the Commission you are interested in serving on: V6 rk5 n ul R_ecrea4; t City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 1. Indicate why you wish to serve on this Commission. Provide any experience or, qualifications you may possess that you think would be beneficial to this Commission. A resume (optional) may be attached, (Note: All information contained on the resume is public information, will be distributed to the public and posted on the City's website). WE" <H. m pang 1 of 9 Note: This contact information will not be posted on the City's website or distributed to the public. However, this information is still subject to release pursuant to the California Public Records Act. Applications submitted for recruitment will not be held past Council appointments. 2. Contact Information: Name: CeiH61 L�AU'6lt ro U ooJ Street: % Z.g RA l'("Pui�d V City: _ LOM -A_ Mao, �—� Zip: 92,n26 Phone (cell): a2,- (home): E-mail Address: H;),—YYtGl1 PQ,&km • am i By checking th' , ox and typing my name below, I am electronically signing my application. Signature Date: Ho,rA (C.eA1 OW ) t I 1 f Please submit application by mail, fax, email or bring to City Hall (77 Fair Drive): Mailing Address: City Clerk's Office City of Costa Mesa P.O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 Phone: (714) 754-5225 Fax: (714) 754-4942 cityclerk@ costa mesaca,g ov_ Page 2 of 2 January 17, 2017 Dear City Council Members: I respectfully submit my application to serve on the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Costa Mesa. I am a Costa Mesa homeowner who regularly uses and enjoys the City's open spaces. I would bring my expertise of land management to City parks with the goal of engaging the community to love our open spaces. For the past seven years, I have worked as an Environmental Scientist with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. My main role is to manage the State's Ecological Reserves in Orange County. My normal duties include many of the same duties performed by the City's staff. I am responsible for the management of public facilities to ensure they meet standards of public safety and create enjoyable visitor experiences while protecting sensitive species and habitats. I work with staff to ensure facilities, trails, fences, signage, kiosks, trash and weeds are regularly maintained on nearly 2,000 acres of protected land. I enjoy working with others and have devoted my free time to working in collaborative groups. I currently serve as Chair for the Orange County Marine Protected Area Council, a local collaborative that includes coastal Cities, State and Federal resource agencies, universities, businesses, and non-governmental organizations with the unified goal of education and outreach, research, and enforcement for marine protected areas. My leadership role indicates that I am able to lead an organization to reach the collective objectives and maintain a good working relationship with a diverse set of individuals and organizations. I love Costa Mesa and want to engage our community to enjoy our open spaces as a way to connect with others, connect with nature, and have some fun! Sh, y, Carla Navarro Woods Carla Navarro Woods (COAK0- iKfWrKa+is�A mt file) California State University, Fullerton, California Master of Science in Biology, Marine Biology Emphasis, August 2009 Thesis: Feeding Rates of Native Herbivores on Native and Non -Native Seaweeds University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California Bachelor of Science in Aquatic Biology, March 2000 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Newport Beach, CA Environmental Scientist November 2009 -Present www,wildlife.ca.gov • Administer the daily management of State Ecological Reserves including Upper Newport Bay, Coal Canyon, Laguna Laurel, and Trabuco Canyon. • Represent the Department on assigned Cooperative Management Committees and Technical Teams for ecosystem restoration, habitat and lands management. • Lead for permanent and seasonal staff to ensure facilities, trails, fences, signage, kiosks, trash, and weeds are regularly maintained. • Conduct biological monitoring, analyze data, and determine level of management needed for sensitive species and habitats including coastal wetlands, sage scrub, and chaparral habitats. • Prepare, implement, and revise adaptive management plans for ecological reserves. • Prepare monthly reports, annual work plans, and budget information.. Orange County Marine Protected Area Council Chair, Two year term January 2016 -Present Co -Chair, One year term 2015 Secretary, One year term 2014 www.ocmarineprotection.org • Volunteer position focused on research, education and enforcement issues in marine protected areas (MPA) in Orange County. • Organize and lead regular meetings composed of City, State and Federal governments, non-governmental organizations and University researchers. • Oversee grant progress, deliverables and authorize sub -contractor payments. • Communicate marine policy to public and connect with interested parties for potential collaboration, Carla Navarro Woods (Onj-4& f vt(mrl tai-irm an ") CSU Fullerton, Department of Biological Science Fullerton, CA Graduate Researcher September 2005 -October 2009 • Conducted near -shore marine species surveys and intertidal habitat restoration. • Compiled and maintained 12 years of biological monitoring data. • Prepared and presented scientific findings at research workshops and educational institutions. • Helped write USC Sea Grant proposal funded for $140,000 to conduct Master's thesis research. • Purchased laboratory supplies and performed routine maintenance on laboratory equipment. National Marine Fisheries Service Marine Debris/Coral Reef Specialist Honolulu, HI March 2002 -November 2004 • Conducted snorkel and SCUBA surveys to remove over 200 tons of derelict fishing gear. • Spent extensive time at sea 0.240 days) navigating small boats to field sites. • Coordinated field collection of marine invertebrate data. • Trained new personnel in boating safety, remote field operations and gear maintenance. AMEC Earth and Environmental Santa Barbara, CA Biologist February 2001 -March 2002 • Helped prepare environmental documents for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act on various southern California projects. • Provided technical support for biological assessments, mitigation compliance, and restoration projects including wetlands mitigation, desert plant restoration, cell tower locations, and avian studies. • Undertook project management responsibilities for a 250 -acre desert restoration project in the western Mojave. • Compiled and analyzed data using statistical procedures, and summarized results for client reports. Marine Science Institute, UC Santa Barbara Staff Research Technician July 1999 -January 2001 • Assisted with field sampling efforts in sandy beaches. • Field and laboratory analysis consisted of macro faunal sorting, identification and sediment processing. • Conducted dive operations at offshore oil platforms using underwater sampling methodologies, Carla Navarro Woods (tonhv,+ l n kratai i dpi 6v1 RIP-) Special Skills • Trained in sensitive species monitoring. • Certified NOAA/CDFW Caulerpa surveyor and eelgrass surveyor. • Experienced in nearshore marine, wetland, and coastal sage scrub habitat surveys. • Can read, write and speak fluent Spanish. Publications Navarro, Carla. 2009. Feeding Rates of Native Herbivores on Native and Non -Native Seaweeds. Master's thesis. California State University, Fullerton. McGinnis, Michael Vincent and Navarro, Carla. 2001. Setting the Rigs to Reef Agenda: The Case of the Gulf Experience. In: The Politics, Economics, and Ecology of Decommissioning Offshore Oil and Gas Structures. MMS OCS Study 2001-006, McGinnis, Michael Vincent and Navarro, Carla. 2001. Wetland Conservation and Planning in California. In: Mating the Watershed Connection: A Profile of Watersheds, Wetlands and Regional Planning Efforts for the South Coast. University of California Ocean and Coastal Policy Center, Marine Science Institute, White Paper #4. Awards & Scholarships • Kennedy-Kolpin Bolsa Chica Conservation Award 2013 • Graduate Research Scholarship, CSU Fullerton, $500 2007 & 2008 • Natural Science & Mathematics ICC Student Award, CSU Fullerton, $50, 2007 & 2008 • Paul Nurhemburg Research Diving Scholarship, UCCB, $200 2000 Lee Scholarship, UCSB, $500 1999 Interests: Costa Mesa Little League, hiking and native plant gardening TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Costa Mesa Parks & Recreation Commission Application ADDITIONAL. DOCUMENTS FOR OB -1 From: 1)2omuier@vahoo.com [mailto:h2omuier2yahoo com] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 4:21 PM To: GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.green@costamesaca.poy> Subject: Re: Costa Mesa Parks & Recreation Commission Application Dear Ms. Green, I enjoyed interviewing and the process. If possible, please let the council know that I would also like them to consider my application for Planning Commission as well as Parks Commission. Thank you, Carla Navarro Woods On Jan 20, 2017, at 3:11 PM, GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.ereen@costamesaca.gov> wrote: iLlalQ Thank you for applying to the Parks & Recreation Commission. You have been selected by the Council to be interviewed on Tuesday January 24th. Please find attached the agenda and the agenda report. You have been assigned a time to be interviewed and it is listed on the agenda report. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions and we will see you next Tuesday. Thank you. Brenda Green City Clerk City of Costa Mesa 714/754.5221 <01-24-17 Agenda (Special Meeting).pdf> <SM -I .pdf> TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Revote Planning Commission ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: HanksterC@aol.com [mailto:HanksterC@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:11 PM To: RIGHEIMER, JIM<JIM.RIGHEIMER@costamesaca.gov>; FOLEY, KATRINA<KATRINA.FOLEY@costamesaca.gov>; GENIS, SANDRA <SANDRA.GENIS@costamesaca.gov>; alan.mansoor@costamesaca.gov; STEPHENS, JOHN <JOHN.STEPHENS@costamesaca.gov>; SHELTON, KELLY <KELLY.SH ELTON @costa mesaca.gov> Subject: Revote Planning Commission Councilors, I am requesting that you vote this evening to nullify the Planning Commission vote taken at your last council meeting and to completely redo the process. The initial vote was flawed in so many ways that corrective action is warranted. Henry Castignetti 2480 Placentia Ave. Costa Mesa TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: [BULK] RE: TERMINATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER Importance: Low ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: Alex Reich [mailto:alex@alexreich.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 1:56 PM To: CITY COUNCIL <CITYCOUNCIL@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: [BULK] RE: TERMINATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER Importance: Low Hi, I ain also in support of MPT Genis' motion and urge you to vote YES on it. We all make mistakes. As there was confusion on the ranking instructions which altered the results beyond the intent by those involved, it has created a cloud of inauthenticity; this motion corrects this problem. Best Regards, Alex Reich Mesa Verde TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: RE: Planning Commission Appointment Process ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR N13-2 From: Cindy Brenneman [mailto:cindy brenneman@ca.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 1:53 PM To: FOLEY, KATRINA<KATRINA.FOLEY@costamesaca.gov>; SANDRA GENIS <slgenis@aol.com>; sandy.genis@costamesaca.gov; STEPHENS, JOHN<JOHN.STEPHENS@costamesaca.gov>; MANSOOR, ALLAN <ALLAN.MANSOOR@costa mesaca.gov>; RIGHEIMER,JIM<JIM.RIGHEIMER@costamesaca.gov>; stephan.andranian@costamesaca.gov; byron.dearakal@costamesaca.gov; susan.gonzales@costamesaca.gov; ieffrev. harlan@costamesaca.gov; carla.woods@costamesaca.gov; HATCH, THOMAS <THOMAS.HATCH @costamesaca.gov>; GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.green@costamesaca.gov> Subject: Planning Commission Appointment Process Importance: High Dear Mayor Foley, Mayor Pro -Tem Genis, Councilmembers Monsoor, Stephens & Righeimer, Planning Commission Chairman Andranian, Co -Chair de Arakal & Commissioners Harlan, Gonzales & Woods, and City Manager Tom Hatch; At tonight's council meeting under NB #2: Termination of Planning Commission Member, you will be considering firing our newly seated, sworn in and elected Chair of our Planning Commission. While I realize this is in an attempt to correct a voting error on the part of MPT Genis, this IS A REALLY REALLY BAD IDEAI As pointed out by Tom & Eleanor Egan in their letter to the Daily Pilot, as noble as it is for MPT Genis to own up to her mistake and want to take steps to correct it, there were at least three other mistakes made in the appointment process. The one I have the biggest issue with is the appointment of an individual to the Planning Commission that was NEVER interviewed for the planning commission, only Parks and Rec. This is wrong and unfair for a number of reasons. The set of questions asked to the park and rec applicants and the planning commission applicants were completely different. Submitting a request via email at 4:21pm on the Friday before a Tuesday vote requesting to be "considered" for a position you haven't been interviewed for is bad form. Accepting it (after the deadline and without proper vetting), placing it on some ballots and subsequently voting the individual on to that commission is just plain wrong! I attended all of the interviews of ter which I shared my thoughts and recommendations with you. I included an excerpt below. I realize that this will have to be resolved in some way. What has transpired cannot really just be undone. Feelings have been hurt, trust has been damaged, friendships are at stake, but NONE of that matters! Right and wrong do matter. Teresa Calla Drain would have been seated on the Planning Commission had the votes been cast correctly AND Carla Navarro Woods should have ONLY been considered for the Parks 1 Commission. Had this been done it wouldn't have effected Mr. Andranian at all. He'd still be on the planning commission. I attended the first Planning Commission meeting and watched the swearing in process, the election of the Chair and Co -Chair and how the commission handled the items presented to them with great interest. I was impressed with the way that especially, Chair Andranion and Co-chair de Arakal handled themselves. They asked great questions and seemed to truly be trying to strike a balance between property rights and the best interest of the community. I was quite disappointed that I did not get to see the urban planner, Jeff Harlan in action that night, but hopefully will soon. I honestly don't know how this will all shake out. I just know that the public trust needs must be restored. Good Luck tonight. Cindy An excerpt from my email after a// the interviews Dear Mayor Foley, Mayor Pro -tem Genis and Council Members, I attended the interviews last week for Park & Recreation Commissioners and Senior Commission members. For what it's worth I would like to offer you my two cents worth and opinion. I will also be in attendance tonight but since you will then be voting on all three, I will include my thoughts on Planning Commission recommendations also. First off I'd like to say that you have a tough job and received several extremely qualified applicants for all three commissions. Park and Recs Commission — Carla Navarro woods - Very impressive. Bi -lingual. Had extremely good eye contact. Her background with fish and wildlife, and with sensitive species, make her uniquely qualified for the position. Planning: Teresa Calla Drain - After listening to Teresa tonight I am even more impressed and committed to my previous comments. I believe she would be a wonderful planning commissioner. I think she would work well with City staff and be respectful of the opinions and input of the citizens. She would provide a unique perspective while being very objective. Teresa could also definitely hit the ground running on day 1! So there you have it, for what it's worth. Thank you for all you do. This is a tough job and I don't envy you your decisions but know you will ALL do what's best for our community. All the best, Cindy B 714-904-7488 Cell/Text 3 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: revote of Planning Commission ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 -----Original Message ----- From: Flo Martin <flomama(a aol.com> To: jim.righeimer<lim.righeimer(sDcostamesaca.gov>; katrina.foley<katrina.folevCcDcostamesaca.gov>; sandra.genis <sandra.genisna,costamesaca.gov>; alan.mansoor<alan.mansoor(o),costamesaca.gov>; john.stephens <John.stephens(u)costamesaca.gov>; kelly.shelton<kelly.shelton(a�costamesaca.gov> Sent: Tue, Feb 21, 2017 1:45 pm Subject: revote of Planning Commission Dear Costa Mesa Council Members, I am requesting that you vote this evening to nullify the vote on Planning Commission taken at your last council meeting and to completely redo the process. 1. Member Genis misunderstood the numbering and voted incorrectly. (Perhaps other council members did as well.) 2. Members Mansoor and Righeimer voted on "invalid" ballots, not the ones handed out at the council meeting when the vote was taken. The ballot they both submitted did not even include Ms. Carla Navarro Woods, for heavens sakes! 3. Ms. Carla Navarro Woods did not apply for the Planning Commission in a timely fashion. 4.The documents Ms. Woods submitted to the City Clerk pertained to the Parks and Recreation Committee. 5. Ms. Woods was not interviewed for the Planning Commission. She fielded questions pertaining only to her application for Parks and Recreation. 6. The 15 candidates for Planning Commission who applied and were interviewed were placed on the ballot in alphabetical order, from Stephan Andranian to Jonathan Zich. Ms. Woods was placed last, out of order, as an "add-on" on the ballots submitted by you in the voting process at your last council meeting. If you decide to revote, please, DO NOT include Ms. Woods for Planning Commission. Flo Martin 2442 Andover Place Costa Mesa, CA 92626 949.933.3699 "It is when we are alone that we are the least alone." St. Augustine 1 TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: February 21, 2017 City Council Meeting - New Business Item No. 2 - Termination of Planning Commission Member /ql.1No[67112MAN From: Cynthia McDonald [mailto:cmcdonald.home@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:28 PM To: GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.green@costamesaca.gov>; FOLEY, KATRINA<KATRINA.FOLEY@costamesaca.gov>; RIGHEIMER, JIM<JIM.RIGHEIMER@costamesaca.gov>; GENIS, SANDRA <SANDRA.GENIS@costamesaca.gov>; MANSOOR, ALLAN<ALLAN.MANSOOR@costamesaca.gov>; STEPHENS, JOHN <JOHN.STEPHENS@costamesaca.gov> Subject: February 21, 2017 City Council Meeting - New Business Item No. 2 - Termination of Planning Commission Member Dear Clerk and City Council We support Sandy Genis' request to release Stephan Andranian from the Planning Commission. Please understand this in no way is a reflection on Mr. Andranian, who we feel is qualified and would perform well. We are supporting Ms. Genis' request because the election process was flawed and her mistake was unintentional and understandable. The form of ballot that was used by the City was confusing. The instructions were at the bottom and they appeared to be footnotes, rather than instructions. The ballots we have seen used for corporate meetings always have the instructions at the top. Anything that is particularly important is usually in boldface or capital letters. Having the instructions before the list of nominees likely would have prevented Ms. Genis' error. Because the vote tally was made in an adjacent office, and not in the council chambers, there was little chance for Ms. Genis to catch her mistake. If the calculations had been displayed to her and the public, we are certain she would have instructed the City Clerk to reverse her order of ranking, and the vote that was ratified would have reflected her intent. It was obvious when speaking with Ms. Genis immediately after the vote tally and ratification she did not feel her vote had been correctly reflected in the final count. We ask that each of you support the release of Mr. Andranian and proceed with recruitment and appointment of a new Planning Commissioner. Alternatively, since Mr. Andranian was appointed due to a mistake, we support ratifying a corrected vote and appointing Mrs. Drain to the commission. Thank you for your consideration. Please accept this communication as part of the public record. Please redact our personal information. Rick Huffman and Cynthia McDonald TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: Item NB -2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -2 From: Jeffrey Resnick [mailto:jresnick@vrslaw.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:58 PM To: CITY CLERK <CITYCLERK@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us> Subject: Item NB -2 Dear Costa Mesa Council Member, I would like to recommend that you vote "No" to Item NB -2. Removing Stephan Andranian from the planning commission would be a mistake and create a dangerous precedent. I have known Mr. Andranian for nearly 8 years. He is an advocate for the Costa Mesa community. His experience on the planning commission combined with his professional experience would serve the planning commission and the people of Costa Mesa well. There was a reason the fellow members of the planning commission voted Mr. Andranian to be its chairman. Since Mr. Andranian is raising a family in the community, he will always have the long term community interest in his decisions. What Sandy Genis is seeking to accomplish is unprecedented and dangerous. It would be a mistake if Mr. Andranian were removed from the Planning Commission. Please put politics aside and vote "No" on Item NB -2. Sincerely, Jeffrey Resnick Costa Mesa resident for 17 years