Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 - - Master Plan PA-16-71 for Lions Park - 3/28/2017CITY COUNC/L, PLANNING COMM/SS/ON, AND PARKS AND RECREA TION COMM/SS/ON JO/NT MEET/NG AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: MARCH 28, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: 1 SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN PA -16-71 FOR THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS, 570 WEST 18TH STREET, 1845 AND 1855 PARK AVENUE DATE: MARCH 16, 2017 FROM: PLANNING DIVISION/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION BY: MEL LEE, SENIOR PLANNER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MEL LEE, AICP (714) 754-5611 mel.lee@costamesaca.gov DESCRIPTION The Lions Park Projects are phased to facilitate the construction of a new library and cafe and to relocate the City's Neighborhood Community Center (NCC). Groundbreaking for the projects is scheduled for July 28, 2017 with construction anticipated to commence on July 31, 2017. The Lions Park Projects require the following actions: Planning Commission Adoption of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND): The IS/MND document analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Significant environmental impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance with the inclusion of conditions of approval and mitigation measures incorporated into the resolution for approval. Planning Commission Approval of Master Plan PA -16-71: As part of the master plan, three individual projects are proposed to be completed in two successive construction phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2). The three projects include: 1. Improvements to Lions Park and new signage, including building signs and directional/wayfinding signs (Phase 1); 2. Demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) and construction of a new library building and cafe (Phase 1); and 3. Renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library building to be repurposed as the new Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) (Phase 2). City Council Approval for Public Services Department to Initiate the Construction Bidding Process: 1. Adopt plans, specifications, and working details for the Lions Park Projects, City Project No. 17-03; and 2. Authorize staff to advertise the Lions Park Projects for construction. APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT The applicant/authorized agent is the City of Costa Mesa. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as set forth in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et. seq. and the California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq. RECOMMENDATIONS Parks and Recreation Commission: 1. Approve the Lions Park Projects Master Plan as proposed. Planning Commission: 1. Adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and 2. Adopt a resolution to approve Planning Application PA -16-71 for the Lions Park Projects Master Plan, subject to conditions of approval and mitigation measures. City Council: 1. Adopt plans, specifications, and working details for the Lions Park Projects Master Plan, City Project No. 17-03; and 2. Authorize staff to advertise the Lions Park Projects for construction. PLANNING APPLICATION SUMMARY Location: 570 W. 18th Street, 1845, and Application: PA -16-71 1855 Park Avenue Request: Lions Park Projects Master Plan: Demolish NCC and Replace w/New Library (Phase 1) Remodel Existing Library into New NCC (Phase 2) SUBJECT PROPERTY: SURROUNDING PROPERTY: Zone: I&R North: R3 (Residential Units) General Plan: Public/Institutional South: Acr. W. 18th St.: R2 -HD and R1 (Residential 12.8 AC (563,293 SF) Units) Lot Dimensions: 600 FT x 959 FT East: Acr. Park Ave.: PDC (Shopping Center) and R3 Coverage (Development Lot) (Residential Units) Lot Area: 12.8 AC (563,293 SF) West: Acr. Anaheim Ave.: R2 -HD and R3 (Residential Landscaping Entire Park 444,633 SF Units) Existing Development: Lions Park with NCC (to be demolished) and Library (to be remodeled). DEVELOPMENT STANDARD COMPARISON Development Standard Required/Allowed Proposed/Provided Lot Size: Lot Width 60 FT 600 FT Lot Area (Entire Park) 6,000 SF 12.8 AC (563,293 SF) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .25 (140,823 SF) .09 (53,442 SF) Coverage (Development Lot) Buildings (New and Existing) NA 53,442 SF Landscaping NA 444,633 SF Paving NA 65,218 SF TOTAL SITE: 563,293 SF Building Height (Proposed Library) 4 Stories 2 Stories 44.5 FT Setbacks (Proposed Library) Front (Park Ave.) 20 FT 40 FT Side Left (W.18th St.)/Right 20 FT/5 FT 270 FT/423 FT Rear (Anaheim Ave.) 20 FT 420 FT Parking (Entire Park, Including On -Street Parking): Standard NA 276 Compact NA NA Handicap 7 11 TOTAL: NA 287 Spaces NA = Not Applicable or No Requirement CEQA Status Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Final Action I City Council/Planning Commission/Parks and Recreation Commission BACKGROUND Project Site/Environs The project site is located at Lions Park, located at 570 West 18th Street, 1845 and 1855 Park Avenue. Lions Park is bound by Plummer Street and the Park Center Place Apartments to the north, Park Avenue to the east, West 18th Street to the south, and Anaheim Avenue to the west. Lions Park measures approximately 12.8 acres. The park includes Davis Field, Costa Mesa Historical Society, Downtown Recreation Center, Downtown Aquatic Center, Neighborhood Community Center (NCC), Costa Mesa Donald Dungan Library, and Fire Station 3. The project site does not encompass all of Lions Park; only the portion which includes the Donald Dungan Library, the NCC building, a portion of parkland just south of the existing NCC, and the area between the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and Anaheim Avenue. Areas of Proposed Lions Park Projects (Outlined in Red) Source: ECORP IS/MND 2/13/2017 Surroundina Land Uses. Zonina and General Plan Desianations r Land Use Designation u I&R — Institutional and Public/Institutional Parkland and Recreational Site Recreational Ar Uses . 71 Ar R3 - Multiple Family High Density Residential (20 Multi -family residential 24 J11 D. Residential du/ac IT V East Development Commercial, Commercial Center, High Commercial/Retail, Multi - R3 - Multiple Family Density Residential (20 du/ac) family residential Residential oil rt South Residential, R2 -HD - du/ac), Medium Density Single-family residential Multiple Family Residential � ha•1 WIM it � .• Areas of Proposed Lions Park Projects (Outlined in Red) Source: ECORP IS/MND 2/13/2017 Surroundina Land Uses. Zonina and General Plan Desianations Zoning Designation Land Use Designation Existing Land Use Project I&R — Institutional and Public/Institutional Parkland and Recreational Site Recreational Uses North R3 - Multiple Family High Density Residential (20 Multi -family residential Residential du/ac PDC — Planned East Development Commercial, Commercial Center, High Commercial/Retail, Multi - R3 - Multiple Family Density Residential (20 du/ac) family residential Residential R1 - Single Family Low Density Residential (8 South Residential, R2 -HD - du/ac), Medium Density Single-family residential Multiple Family Residential Residential 12 du/ac Zoning Designation Land Use Designation Existing Land Use (High Density) R2 -HD - Multiple Family West Residential (High Density), High Density Residential (20 Multi -family and single R3 - Multiple Family du/ac) family residential Residential Notes: du/ac = dwelling unit per acre Existing NCC (Left) and Library (Right) Historical Society Building Along Anaheim Avenue The improvements to Lions Park include the demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center (NCC), construction of a new library, construction of a new cafe (snack and beverage kiosk), renovation of the existing library to be repurposed as the new NCC, landscape and irrigation improvements, new parking spaces, and off-site street improvements to Park Avenue and Anaheim Avenue, and new building signs and directional/wayfinding signs. The Lions Park Projects are proposed to be constructed in two phases and are described below: Phase 1 The existing NCC would be demolished to make room for the new two-story 22,860 square foot library, which, because of the smaller footprint of the new two-story building, would increase the park's open space by approximately one acre. The expanded open space will provide a venue for various activities including art shows, concerts, farmer's markets, and recreational programs. The cafe would measure approximately 890 square feet and would serve all facilities in the park. The new surface parking lot would be located in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and provide approximately 20 new parking spaces. This new parking lot would be accessed from Anaheim Avenue. Off-site street improvements include improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues. Improvements are detailed below: • Park Avenue improvements include new sidewalks, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, street trees, street furnishings, and approximately 29 new parking spaces. These improvements would affect approximately 580 linear feet of street frontage, and 17,430 square feet in area. • Anaheim Avenue improvements include new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, and street trees. These improvements would affect approximately 145 lineal feet of street frontage and 2,350 square feet in area. New Library Elevations i r c 3 New Library Elevations i I f I f -MESA CAFE -tea ®Md New Cafe Elevations Phase 1 Site Plan �r .... ............. ............. I . LEWNlY PHASE Wain..__... .,.._., _ _ '� ,........�.......T LEI' EW PAMUM Ik I 77L A1.18 -LEE➢ SFTE PLAN- UW.ARYPWE Phase 1 Site Plan Phase 2 Phase 2 of the proposed project includes the renovation of the existing 8,740 square foot Donald Dungan Library to be repurposed as the new NCC, site landscaping immediately surrounding the building, and a new slurry coat finish and restriping of the Park Avenue surface parking lot located at the front of the building. New NCC Elevations Phase 2 Site Plan ANALYSIS IIII FT[Tn-r_i7 L LEED3F7EFLM_2 On November 9, 2015, the City Council selected the architectural firm Johnson Favaro to design the Lions Park Projects. Johnson Favaro has completed similar projects such as the West Hollywood Library, Beverly Hills Library, and Manhattan Beach Library. Over the past 15 months, the consultant and City staff held several meetings with various stakeholders, including Orange County library staff and Friends of Library, to solicit input and provide updates on the project's design. The first floor of the library would include a multipurpose room, market place, circulation workroom, meeting room, Friends of the Library workroom, staff workroom, restrooms, children's library, and early childhood area. The second floor would include a staff workroom, staff lounge, staff restrooms, two study rooms, public restrooms, adult collections, and a teen room. The new library will have a smaller building footprint than the existing NCC, thereby increasing park open space by one acre. The expanded open space will provide a venue for various activities including art shows, concerts, farmer's markets, and recreational programs. The exterior of the new library would be composed of smooth finish plaster, tile, and glass. New exterior signage includes building wall signage for both the library and cafe, as well as directional and wayfinding signage, within the park. The new library would be designed to achieve a U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) rating of Gold. The renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library to be repurposed as new NCC as part of Phase 2 construction includes minor floor area expansion totaling approximately 600 square feet to include a new catering kitchen, new exterior glazing and entrance doors, new mechanical equipment, electrical panels, new lighting, and audio visual/information technology equipment and infrastructure. The renovation also includes a new walled loading/delivery area to serve the facility. New exterior signage includes building wall signage, as well as directional and wayfinding signage, within the park. The renovated building would be designed to achieve a USGBC LEED rating of Silver. A full set of project plans are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, Development Services Department, and Public Services Department. The project will be advertised for construction to prequalified contractors possessing experience with projects of similar scope and magnitude. The City Council, at their meeting on August 2, 2016, selected STV, Inc., to provide constructability review and construction management services. STV has assisted the City with the contractor prequalification process and in conducting final constructability review of the plans and specifications. STV will staff the Lions Park Projects with an on- site Construction Project Manager as well as inspectors. Project Timing Phase 1 construction is anticipated to begin in July 2017 and end December 2018. Phase 2 construction is anticipated to begin February 2019 and end February 2020. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE CONFORMANCE The proposed project would be in conformance with the following planning documents: • City of Costa Mesa General Plan • City of Costa Mesa Zoning Code Conformance with the City of Costa Mesa General Plan The Costa Mesa General Plan establishes the long-range planning and policy direction that guides change and preserves the qualities that define the community. The 2015- 2035 General Plan sets forth the vision for Costa Mesa for the next two decades. This vision recognizes that Costa Mesa's focus remains on protecting and enhancing Costa Mesa's diverse residential neighborhoods, accommodating an array of businesses that both serve local needs and attract regional and international spending, and continuing to provide cultural, educational, social, and recreational amenities that contribute to the quality of life in the community. Over the long term, General Plan implementation will ensure that development decisions and improvements to public and private infrastructure are consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies contained in this Plan. Specifically, the project complies with the following General Plan Policies and Objectives: Objective OSR-1A: Maintain and preserve existing parks, and strive to provide additional parks, public spaces, and recreation facilities that meet the community's evolving needs. • Consistency: The proposed project would continue the existing park use, as well provide additional facilities to meet the continuing needs of the community. The new library will have a smaller building footprint than the existing NCC, thereby increasing park open space by one acre. Policy OSR-1.1: Maintain a system of Neighborhood and Community Parks that provide a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities throughout the City. • Consistency: The proposed project will continue to provide active and passive amenities serving the community. Policy OSR-1.2: Provide parks and recreation facilities appropriate for the individual neighborhoods in which they are located and reflective of the needs and interests of the population they serve. • Consistency: The proposed project will continue to allow the park to provide facilities appropriate for the community. Conformance with the Zoning Code The proposed project will comply with the development standards for the I&R — Institutional and Recreational zone, including setbacks, building heights, and Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Although the Zoning Code does not specify a parking requirement for park facilities, the same number of parking spaces available for the existing site (287 spaces) will be maintained. Justifications for Approval Pursuant to Title 13, Section 13-29(g), Findings, of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, the decision making bodies shall find that the evidence presented in the administrative record substantially meets specified findings. Staff recommends approval of the proposed project, based on an assessment of facts and findings below which are also described in more detail in the draft approval resolution. • The master plan meets the broader goals of the General Plan and the Zoning Code by exhibiting excellence in design, site planning, integration of uses and structures, and protection of the integrity of neighboring development. The proposed project is located in an area zoned I&R — Institutional and Recreational. The proposed project would be located at Lions Park in a fully developed area of the City, would continue an existing use, and would not physically divide an established community. The proposed project would not significantly change the visual character of the park, and would be consistent and compatible with the existing public facilities within the park and not degrade the existing visual character of the area. • The proposed uses comply with the development standards for the I&R — Institutional and Recreational zone. The project meets or exceeds the minimum development standards required by Code with regard to parking, building height, and Floor Area Ratio (FAR). The recommended conditions of approval will ensure the use is compatible with surrounding properties and uses. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project by ECORP Consulting, Inc., in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the IS/MND was originally made available for a 20 -day public review and comment period from February 13, 2017 to March 4, 2017. The IS/MND found that the environmental effects from the project would be less than significant with the incorporation of standard conditions of approval and mitigation measures (see Exhibit C of the resolution). A copy of the IS/MND is provided under separate cover. PUBLIC NOTICE Pursuant to Title 13, Section 13-29(d), of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, three types of public notification have been completed no less than 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing: 1. Mailed notice. A public notice was mailed to all property owners within a 500 - foot radius of the project site. The required notice radius is measured from the external boundaries of the property. 2. On-site posting. A public notice was posted on each street frontage of the project site. 3. Newspaper publication. A public notice was published once in the Daily Pilot newspaper. 4. IS/MND. The notice and public review for the IS/MND was performed as described in the previous section of this report. LEGAL REVIEW The draft resolution has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office. FISCAL REVIEW On June 21, 2016, the City Council approved in concept an updated financing plan for the Lions Park Projects ($36,000,000) which also included Fire Station 1 (an additional $10,000,000). This financing plan contemplates the accumulation of City funds during FY 16-17 through FY 19-20 supplemented by an estimated $18,506,603 from a 25 -year Certificates of Participation (COP) or other type of debt financing. A copy of this financing plan is included as Attachment 5. On January 17, 2017, the City Council approved an agreement with Fieldman-Rolapp & Associates to help develop the debt financing strategy and implement the plan. The financing strategy is under way and includes the goals of keeping the City's annual debt service payments at or below the current levels, meeting the cash flow needs of the construction contract payment schedule, possible early payoff of the 2003 COP (related to the Civic Center and Victoria Street right-of-way property) and possibly refinancing the 2007 COP (related to the past expansion of the police facility) for additional general fund savings. Staff will return to Council as soon financing options are ready for consideration and selection. ALTERNATIVES Approve the proiect with modifications. The City Council, Planning Commission, and Parks and Recreation Commission may suggest specific changes that are necessary to alleviate any concerns. If any of the additional requested changes are substantial, the item should be continued to a future meeting to allow a redesign or additional analysis. Staff will return with a revised resolution incorporating new findings and/or conditions. CONCLUSION The Lions Park Projects would transform the existing Lions Park NCC/Library area to provide a more vibrant community -oriented venue and facilities with enhanced and flexible open space. The proposed state-of-the-art library would be designed to achieve high LEED Gold standards and the repurposed NCC would be designed to LEED Silver standards. The expanded open space will provide a venue for various activities including art shows, concerts, farmer's markets, and recreational programs. The Lions Park Projects satisfy the required findings for the proposed Master Plan and is deemed to be a compatible use; therefore, it is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and Zoning Code. Staff recommends approval of the project, adoption of the plans, specifications, and working details for the Lions Park Projects to authorize staff to solicit bids for the construction of the project, and finalize the funding plan for the project. Groundbreaking for the projects is scheduled for July 28, 2017 with construction anticipated to commence on July 31, 2017 MEL LEE, AICP Senior Planner TAMARA S. LETOURNEAU Assistant City Manager STEPHEN DUNIVENT Interim Finance Director JAY TREVINO, AICP Development Services Department Consultant RAJA SETHURAMAN Public Services Director Attachments: 1. Location Map and Zoning Map 2. Site Photos 3. Project Description 4. Draft Resolution 5. Financing Plan 6. Conceptual Plans 7. IS/MND (Under Separate Cover City of Costa Mesa CITY OF COSTA MESA - [Created: 2/22/2017 8:27:11 AM] [Scale: 502.86] [Page: 8.5 x 11 / Landscape] Overview Map Legend Address Parcel Paints Lines Hydrolo- 13City 19y BGundary Channel- s Wate r Ways Street Names OrthG 2010 ROW Leve13 Lines Ortho- 2006 Leve14 Map Display (L W W EN —D Y LNC` Or W 19TH ST ri_urnr m a I CENTER ST Vy 15 1 H no I Ir L 0 04 PARK DR z 1C I ZjJ21 wffovGea Prmc.N LT (C) 2002-7 GeoPrise.net (GeoVec, Inc.) - (866)422-2505 City of Costa Mesa CITY OF COSTA MESA - [Created: 2/22/2017 8:28:30 AM] [Scale: 502.86] [Page: 8.5 x 11 / Landscape] Overview Map Legend Address // Parcel Points Lines Hydrolo- 0 City gy Boundary Channel- s Water Ways Street Names Zoning ROW AP Lines c1 C1S (cont) Map Display 4 0 W -WENDY LN — W 19TH ST C1; PLUMER ST CENTER 5T a�Gaaaa���ua�,-.Q nacr ?6496 Q6 06 44 00 6p 4Q!' 44 1P0 004fl Q4 %? V 0 Qo 9 a, 0Q 60 664 p Q,464 a 0 V, 4 t1 B J _ a. 0 WW W 1 BTH 5T 2 I 4 0 41 �[ 0 a ��. PARK DR —R1— ; Flif2•F wtirw.GmPrim-NGT _ (C) 2002-7 GeoPrise.net (GeoVec, Inc.) - (866)422-2505 I 0 1 JI Chi 61 ej leel.. , -- u �y . y7�4 �.. ......... 1� � ��y ice•. p� � � _ i ,IIIIIIIIIIItplll:�;;.. � :::; ...., .......�..,. I ...,..._-_..---f -� ----• '�� i ' -_-_-___='_1�lsnullfinmm�1i11111111111111111I1nn111!I�Inhlnn�nil�..�. ATTACHMENT 3 The Lions Park Projects — Phase 1 and Phase 2 PROJECT SCOPE The Project, located in Lions Park, includes three projects to be completed in two successive construction phases. The three projects: 1) New two-story 22,860 SF Library (Phase 1); 2) Lions Park Improvements to include street -front improvements for portions of Park Avenue and Anaheim Avenue, 890 SF food and coffee kiosk, and construction of a new surface parking lot accessed from Anaheim Avenue and located in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society (Phase 1); and 3) renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library building (8,740 GSF) to be re -purposed as the new Neighborhood Community Center (Phase 2). PHASE 1 The Phase 1 Project includes design and construction of the new library, the Lions Park Improvements Project and demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) and parking lot. The Lions Park Improvements Project includes approximately 2.45 acres of on-site re -development, increasing usable park open space by approximately 1 acre overall. Included in Lions Park Improvements is a 890 SF snack and beverage service kiosk to serve the park and all facilities in the park. Also included are off-site, street -front improvements on Park Avenue and Anaheim Avenue. Off-site street - front improvement on Park Avenue totals approximately 580 LF of street frontage, 17,430 SF in area and includes new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, street trees, street furnishings and 27 new parking spaces. Off-site street -front improvement on Anaheim Avenue totals approximately 145 LF of street frontage, 2,350 SF in area and includes new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping and street trees. The new surface parking lot provides 22 new parking spaces. PHASE 2 The Phase 2 Project includes renovation of the existing 8,740 SF Donald Dungan Library to be re -purposed as a new community meeting center. The renovation includes minor floor area expansion totaling approximately 600 SF to include a new catering kitchen, new exterior glazing and entrance doors, new mechanical equipment, electrical panels, new lighting, audiovisual/ information technology equipment and infrastructure. Also included are a new walled loading/delivery area to serve the facility, site landscaping immediately surrounding the building and new slurry coat finish and re -striping of the Park Avenue surface parking lot that fronts the building. LEED Gold per the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) rating system is targeted for the Phase 1 project. -I%- ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION PA -16-71, A MASTER PLAN FOR THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS, 570 WEST 18TH STREET, 1845 AND 1855 PARK AVENUE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the Lions Park Projects consists of the following actions: Planning Commission Adoption of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration IS/MND : The IS/MND document analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Significant environmental impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance with the inclusion of conditions of approval and mitigation measures incorporated into the resolution for approval. Planning Commission Approval of Master Plan PA -16-71: As part of the master plan, three individual projects are proposed to be completed in two successive construction phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2). The three projects include: 1. Improvements to Lions Park and new signage, including building signs and directional/wayfinding signs (Phase 1); 2. Demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) and construction of a new library building and cafe (Phase 1); and 3. Renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library building to be repurposed as the new Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) (Phase 2). WHEREAS, a duly noticed joint public hearing was held by the City Council, Planning Commission, and Parks and Recreation Commission on March 28, 2017, with all persons having the opportunity to speak and be heard for and against the proposal. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed all environmental documents comprising the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and has found that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration considers all environmental impacts of the proposed project and a reasonable range of alternatives, and the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is complete, adequate, and fully complies with all requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Costa Mesa Environmental Guidelines. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the 1q- IS/MND was originally made available for a 20 -day public review and comment period from February 13, 2017 to March 4, 2017. WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project reflects the independent judgment of the City of Costa Mesa. BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record and the findings contained in Exhibit A, the conditions of approval contained within Exhibit B, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program contained in Exhibit C, respectively, the Planning Commission hereby (1) ADOPTS the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and (2) APPROVES Planning Application PA -16-71. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon the activity as described in the staff report for Planning Application PA -16-71 and upon the applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions in Exhibit B and Mitigation Measures in Exhibit C, and compliance of all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Any approval granted by this resolution shall be subject to review, modification or revocation if there is a material change that occurs in the operation, or if the applicant fails to comply with any of the conditions of approval and/or mitigation measures. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if any section, division, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this resolution, or the documents in the record in support of this resolution, are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March, 2017. ATTEST: Stephan Andranian, Chair Costa Mesa Planning Commission APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF COSTA MESA — 20- 20_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Resolution Number —as considered at a joint meeting of the City Council, Planning Commission, and Parks and Recreation Commission held on the day of , 2017, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting held on the day of , 2017, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this day of , 2017 -2-1- EXHIBIT A FINDINGS (APPROVAL) A. The proposed project complies with Title 13, Section 13-29(g)(5), Master Plan, of the Municipal Code due to the following: Finding: The master plan meets the broader goals of the General Plan and the zoning code by exhibiting excellence in design, site planning, integration of uses and structures, and protection of the integrity of neighboring development. Facts in Support of Findings: The proposed project is located in an area zoned I&R — Institutional and Recreational. The proposed project would be located at Lions Park in a fully developed area of the City, would continue an existing use, and would not physically divide an established community. The proposed project would not significantly change the visual character of the park, and would be consistent and compatible with the existing public facilities within the park and not degrade the existing visual character of the area. The following describes the proposed project's consistency with specific goals and objectives of the 2015-2035 General Plan. Objective OSR-1A: Maintain and preserve existing parks, and strive to provide additional parks, public spaces, and recreation facilities that meet the community's evolving needs. Consistency: The proposed project would continue the existing park use, as well provide additional facilities to meet the continuing needs of the community. The new library will have a smaller building footprint than the existing NCC, thereby increasing park open space by one acre. Policy OSR-1.1: Maintain a system of Neighborhood and Community Parks that provide a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities throughout the City. Consistency: The proposed project will continue to provide active and passive amenities serving the community. Policy OSR-1.2: Provide parks and recreation facilities appropriate for the individual neighborhoods in which they are located and reflective of the needs and interests of the population they serve. • Consistency: The proposed project will continue to allow the park to provide facilities appropriate for the community. B. The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental procedures. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If any of these conditions are removed, the decision-making body must make a finding that the project will not result in significant environmental impacts, 22^ that the conditions are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency, or that specific economic, social or other considerations make the mitigation measures infeasible. C. The project is exempt from Chapter XII, Article 3, Transportation Demand Management, of Title 13 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code. -23- EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Ping. 1. The uses shall be limited to the type of operation described in this staff report. Any change in the operational characteristics shall require review by the Planning Division and may require an amendment to the master plan, subject to either Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission approval, depending on the nature of the proposed change. 2. The mitigation measures of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration have been included as Exhibit C. If any of these mitigation measures are removed, the decision-making body must make a finding that the project will still not result in significant environmental impacts and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is still valid. 3. No modification(s) of the approved building elevations including, but not limited to, change of architectural type, changes that increase the building height, removal of building articulation, or a change of the finish material(s), shall be made during construction without prior Planning Division written approval. Specifically, elevations shall not be modified unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Director as consistent with the architectural design and features of the proposed development. 4. The applicant shall contact the Planning Division to arrange a Planning inspection of the site prior to the release of occupancy/utilities. This inspection is to confirm that the conditions of approval and code requirements have been satisfied. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall contact the US Postal Service with regard to location and design of mail delivery facilities. Such facilities shall be shown on the site plan, landscape plan, and/or floor plan. 6. Demolition permits for existing structures shall be obtained and all work and inspections completed prior to final building inspections. Applicant is notified that written notice to the Air Quality Management District may be required ten (10) days prior to demolition. 7. The conditions of approval and ordinance or code provisions of planning application PA -16-71 shall be blueprinted on the face of the site plan as part of the plan check submittal package. 8. In the event that archaeological resources are encountered during grading and construction, all construction activities shall be temporarily halted or redirected to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of archaeological materials as determined by the City, who shall establish, in cooperation with the project applicant and a certified archaeologist, the appropriate procedures for exploration and/or salvage of the artifacts. 9. In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during grading and construction operations, all construction activities shall be temporarily halted or redirected to permit a qualified paleontologist to assess the find for significance and, if necessary, develop a paleontological resources impact mitigation plan (PRIMP) for the review and approval by the City prior to resuming excavation activities. 10. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Eng. 11. Maintain the public right-of-way in a "wet -down" condition to prevent excessive dust and promptly remove any spillage from the public right-of- way by sweeping or sprinkling. CODE REQUIREMENTS The following list of federal, state and local laws applicable to the project has been compiled by staff for the applicant's reference. Any reference to "City" pertains to the City of Costa Mesa. Ping. 1. All contractors and subcontractors must have valid business licenses to do business in the City of Costa Mesa. Final inspections, final occupancy and utility releases will not be granted until all such licenses have been obtained. 2. All noise -generating construction activities shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturday. Noise - generating construction activities shall be prohibited on Sunday and the following Federal holidays: New Years Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. 3. Permits shall be obtained for all signs according to the provisions of the Costa Mesa Sign Ordinance. 4. Street address shall be visible from the public street and shall be displayed on the freestanding sign. If there is no freestanding sign, the street address may be displayed on the fascia adjacent to the main entrance or on another prominent location. When the property has alley access, address numerals shall be displayed in a prominent location visible from the alley. Numerals shall be a minimum twelve (12) inches in height with not less than three -fourth -inch stroke and shall contrast sharply with the background. Identification of individual units shall be provided adjacent to the unit entrances. Letters or numerals shall be four (4) inches in height with not less than one -fourth -inch stroke and shall contrast sharply with the background. 5. Approval of the planning application is valid for one (1) year from the effective date of this approval and will expire at the end of that period unless applicant establishes the use by one of the following actions: 1) obtains building permit(s) for the authorized construction and initiates construction. If the applicant is unable to establish the use/obtain building permits within the one-year time period, the applicant may —25- request an extension of time. 6. Trash facilities shall be screened from view, and designed and located appropriately to minimize potential noise and odor impacts. 7. Transformers, backflow preventers, and any other approved above- ground utility improvement shall be located outside of the required street setback area and shall be screened from view, under direction of Planning staff. Any deviation from this requirement shall be subject to review and approval of the Development Services Director. 8. On-site parking stalls shall be double -striped in accordance with City standards. 9. Two (2) sets of detailed landscape and irrigation plans, which meet the requirements set forth in Costa Mesa Municipal Code Sections 13-101 through 13-108, shall be required as part of the project plan check review and approval process. Plans shall be forwarded to the Planning Division for final approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. Two (2) sets of landscape and irrigation plans, approved by the Planning Division, shall be attached to two of the final building plan sets. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with the approved plans prior to final inspection or occupancy clearance. 12. Any mechanical equipment shall be screened from view in a manner approved by the Planning Division. Bldg. 13. Comply with the requirements of the 2016 California Building Code, 2016 California Residential Code, 2016 California Electrical Code, 2016 California Mechanical Code, 2016 California Plumbing Code, 2016 California Green Building Standards Code and 2016 California Energy Code (or the applicable adopted, California Building Code, California Residential Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Green Building Standards, and California Energy Code at the time of plan submittal or permit issuance) and California Code of Regulations also known as the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the City of Costa Mesa. Requirements for accessibility to sites, facilities, buildings, and elements by individuals with disability shall comply with Chapter 11 B of the 2016 California Building Code. 14. Prior to issuing the Building permit the conditions of approval shall be required to be incorporated on the approved Architectural plans. 15. The Building Division will not issue a demolition permit until an Identification Number is provided by AQMD. 16. Provide a plan to the County of Orange Health Dept. for review and approval. 17. Submit a precise grading plans, an erosion control plan and a hydrology study. 18. Submit a soils report for this project. Soil's Report recommendations shall be blueprinted on both the architectural and the precise grading plans. -2Co-- 19. The ground adjacent immediately to the foundation shall be slopes away from the building at a slope of not less than 5% for a minimum distance of 10 feet measured perpendicular to the face of the wall CBC sec. 1804.3. See also exception. 20. On graded sites the top of exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved discharge devise a minimum of 12 inches plus 2 percent 2013 California Building Code sec. 1808.7.4 WQMP 21. In order to comply with the 2003 DAMP, the proposed project shall prepare a Storm Drain Plan, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) conforming to the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer or Environmental Engineer, which shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Fire 22. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the City of Costa Mesa Fire Department shall review and approve the project design features to assess compliance with the California Building Code and California Fire Code. Trans. 23. Construct residential/commercial driveway approach(es) at location(s) specified on submitted site plan. 24. Close unused drive approach(es) with full height curb and gutter. Eng. 25. At the time of development submit for approval an Offsite Plan to the Engineering Division and Grading Plan to the Building Division that shows Sewer, Water, Existing Parkway Improvements and the limits of work on the site, and hydrology calculations, both prepared by a registered Civil Engineer or Architect. Cross lot drainage shall not occur. Construction Access approval must be obtained prior to Building or Engineering Permits being issued by the City of Costa Mesa. Pay Offsite Plan Check fee per Section 13-231 of the C.C.M.M.C. and an approved Offsite Plan shall be required prior to Engineering Permits being issued by the City of Costa Mesa. 26. Obtain a permit from the City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division, at the time of development and then construct P.C.C. driveway approaches per City of Costa Mesa Standards as shown on the Offsite Plan. Location and dimensions are subject to the approval of the Transportation Services Manager. ADA compliance required for all new driveway approaches. 27. Obtain a permit from the City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division, at the time of development and then remove any existing driveways and/or curb depressions that will not be used and replace with full height curb and sidewalk. — 2-9 — SPECIAL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS The requirements of the following special districts are hereby forwarded to the applicant: Sani. 1. Applicant shall contact the Costa Mesa Sanitary District at (949) 654- 8400 for any district requirements. AQMD 2. Contact South Coast Air Quality Management District located at: 21865 Copley Dr. Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 Tel: 909- 396-2000 Or Visit their web site at hftp://www.costamesaca.gov/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid =23381. Water 3. Customer shall contact the Mesa Water District — Engineering Desk and submit an application and plans for project review. Customer must obtain a letter of approval and a letter of project completion from Mesa Water District. 4. Comply with the requirements of the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to determine if red imported fire ants exist on the property prior to any soil movement or excavation. Call CDFA at (714) 708-1910 for information. EXHIBIT Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 3-1 Lions Park Projects Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan rvungatton ivioxntonng and Keporhng Flan 3-3 March 2017 Monitoring Implementation Responsibility for Mitigation Measures Activity/Timing/ Responsibility/ Oversight of Outside Agency Comments Frequency/Schedule Verification Compliance/ Coordination Verification Biological Resources B-1: If construction activities occur Activity: Project Biologist City of Costa Mesa Possible within the bird breeding season Conduct survey if coordination with (February 1St — August 31St), then the construction is to occur CDFW. City (or its contractor) shall retain a during breeding season. qualified biologist to conduct a pre- Biological monitoring to construction nesting bird survey no avoid active nests (if more than 30 days prior to the start of necessary). Initials Initials construction. The nest survey shall include the Project site and areas Timing: immediately adjacent to the site that 30 days prior to Date Date could potentially be affected by Project construction. activities such as noise, human activity, During construction (if dust, etc. If active bird nests are found necessary). on or immediately adjacent to the Project site, then the qualified biologist will establish an appropriate buffer zone around the active nests, typically a 250 -foot radius for songbirds and a 500 -foot radius for raptors. Project activities shall be avoided within the buffer zone until the nest is deemed no longer active by the biologist. Weekly nesting surveys and biological monitoring may be necessary if nesting birds are found on the Project site. rvungatton ivioxntonng and Keporhng Flan 3-3 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-4 March 2017 Monitoring Implementation Responsibility for Mitigation Measures Activity/Timing/ Responsibility/ Oversight of Outside Agency Comments Frequency/Schedule Verification Compliance/ Coordination Verification B-2: In order to avoid and minimize Activity: Project Manager City of Costa Mesa Possible the potential impact to parkway trees, Existing trees shall be coordination with fencing, guarding or framing should be protected in place. If not the City of Costa placed within a 5 -foot minimum feasible a tree removal Mesa's Public distance of the tree trunk of protected permit will be required. Services Initials Initials trees within and adjacent to the limits of Department, disturbance such that no work shall Timing:. Maintenance occur within the protected area. This During construction (if Division Date Date would provide a full avoidance of direct necessary). impacts to trees protected under the City's municipal code. During construction the contractor shall provide sufficient water to preserve the trees and for overall health of the trees. If this is unfeasible because work cannot be avoided within the protected zone, a permit or exemption shall be obtained from the City's Public Services Department, Maintenance Division. Trees removed under a permit will be replaced at a ratio up to 3:1. The City will comply with the Street Tree Master Plan and all City codes on the landscaping of the Proposed Project. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-4 March 2017 R Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-5 March 2017 Monitoring Implementation Responsibility for Mitigation Measures Activity/Timing/ Responsibility/ Oversight of Outside Agency Comments Frequency/Schedule Verification Compliance/ Coordination Verification Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of grading Activity: Project Manager City of Costa Mesa permits, submit for review and approval Preparation and a Construction Management Plan. This implementation of a plan features methods to minimize Construction Management disruption to the neighboring uses to Plan. Initials Initials the fullest extent that is reasonable and practicable. The plan shall include Timing:. construction parking and vehicle access Prior to the issuance of a Date Date and specifying staging areas and grading permit. delivery and hauling truck routes. The plan should mitigate disruption during construction. The truck route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas and major truck traffic during peak hours. The total truck trips to the site shall not exceed 200 trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus 100 truck trips from the site) unless approved by the Development Services Director or Transportation Services Manager. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-5 March 2017 ATTACHMENT 5 City of Costa Mesa Lions Park and Fire Station 1 Projects Funding Plan Community Library Center Park Street Front Other Total Fire Station 1 Grand Total Revised Option 3 May 2016 6,823,799 4.500% 162,554 j 0.375% 0.375%1 j 30 Estimated Cost $ 17,100,000 4,150,000 6,900,000 820,000 7,030,000 $ 36,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 46,000,000 12,447,067 58,519,594 Annual payment 1,535,751 414,902 1,950,653 Existing Funds 4,000,000 4,000,000 1,676,201 5,676,201 FY 16-17: Capital 1.5% funds 295,501 414,902 710,403 Totalinterest $ 12,353,110 $ Gas Tax 12,353,110 Total cost of loan 300,000 300,000 30,859,713 300,000 Cap. Facil. 1.5% Funds 1,676,201 1,234,389 Repayment: 1,676,201 1,676,201 FY 17-18: 1,240,250 - 1,240,250 Capital 1.5% funds (5,861) - ,. Park Fees 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Gas Tax 300,000 300,000 300,000 CIP 5% Funds (75%) - 4,387,500 4,387,500 Cap. Facil. 1.5% Funds - 1,801,995 FY 18-19: Park Fees 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Gas Tax 220,000 220,000 220,000 CIP 5% Funds (50%) 790,696 2,925,000 Cap. Facil. 1.5% Funds 1,755,000 1,755,000 1,755,000 FY 19-20: CIP 5% Funds (29%) 1,696,500 1,696,500 1,696,500 Cap. Facil. 1.5% Funds 1,755,000 1,755,000 1,755,000 COP or Bond Financing 4,150,000 1,900,000 7,030,000 - 18,506,603 Total Funding $ 17,100,000 4,150,000 6,900,000 820,000 7,030,000 $ 36,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 46,000,000 Original (Nov. 17, 2015) Option 3: Lions Park Proiects Fire Statinn 1 Loan amount Annual interest rate Monthly interest rate Loan period in years Est. Start date of loan $ 25,258,131 $ 6,823,799 4.500% 162,554 j 0.375% 0.375%1 j 30 30� 01/01/2017 01/01/2017 Total $ 32,081,930 Monthly payment $ 127,979 $ 34,575 162,554 Number of payments3601 .. - $ 360 Annual interest rate Total interest $ 20,814,395 $ 5,623,268 26,437,664 Total cost of loan 46,072,526 12,447,067 58,519,594 Annual payment 1,535,751 414,902 1,950,653 Repayment: 01/01/2017. 2003 COPS 1,240,250 - 1,240,250 Capital 1.5% funds 295,501 414,902 710,403 Revised debt pavment calculation -,5) , Lions Park Projects Fire Station 1 Total Loan amount $ 18,506,603 1 $ - $ 18,506,603 Annual interest rate 4.500%'. 4.500%1 Monthly interest rate 0.375% 0.375%j Loan period in years F 25. 25' Est. Start date of loan 01/01/2017' 01/01/2017. Monthly payment $ 102,866 $ - 102,866 Number of payments 300 3001 Totalinterest $ 12,353,110 $ - 12,353,110 Total cost of loan 30,859,713 - 30,859,713 Annual payment 1,234,389 - 1,234,389 Repayment: 2003 COPS 1,240,250 - 1,240,250 Capital 1.5% funds (5,861) - ,. (5,861) -,5) , LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THE OFFICE OF JAMES BURNETT LIGHTING DESIGN DARKHORSELIGHTWORKS CIVIL ENGINEER KPFF GRAPHICS / SIGNAGE Ph.D THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS M.E.P. ENGINEER INTEGRAL GROUP LIBRARY CONSULTANT LINDA DEMMERS COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA PHASE 1 SECURITY SECURE CONSULTING AND DESIGN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NABIH YOUSSEF .: 33- INTERIORS RODRIGO VARGAS DESIGN ACOUSTICS / AV -IT WAVEGUIDE KITCHEN CONSULTANT KITCHEN PROFESSIONALS INC. COST ESTIMATOR MGAC ATTACHMENT 6 ARCHITECT i%Qfi 8 N 5898 BLACIKAELDER STREET CULVER CITY, CA 90232 (TEL) 310 559 5720 (FAX) 310 559 0220 1 a1 r 1 O N 2 ANAHEIM AVF 3$ SPA ES (2 ACCEMBLEI WIDTH: 19' -11" �� ul�ll�ll�llew �� i 1%.:\\\ 2f SPACE PARK AVE WIDTH: 15— (r LIONS PARK - PARKING VKUVIDED: 287 SPACES 34_ SCALE G1.26 - SITE PLAN - PHASE 1 AND PHASE - PARKING : G1� 1 PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t�vgisl A rcbilec— end Urbs" Design 5998 SYteB GmunE Fbw I.e.cM cami3i Re11318assal2o IFu1318assane CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS I ENCINMR"TAMP CITY APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIANCHECKSIJBMITTAL 1.1— W SUBMITTAL 11/50116 100%DD SUBMITTAL 06�1S1B IWiB➢ 64@�lRil OY19�1fi No Issue Dale ISSUE/REVISIONS PARKING PLAN - PHASE 1 & 2 MMM are Dece1be11%2016 aurin JF o¢c�mc G1.26 BIM r VIEW FROM NCC PARKING 'r VIEW FROM PARK AV[ VIEW FROM 18TH STIR 3f�-- VIEW FROM ANAHEIA PIKIJECT 4 t �Jlab r - THE LIONS PARK 1 l PROJECTS ARCHITECT Augis" Arrhlt—f— end Urben Deslpn SCALE: GA01 'I D,n31 a (—)310 _OT LOOKING 6a 0 SOUTH 1 =1b REF CONSULTING ENGINEERS ®Jahrson Favara 2015 .a..anr'� :NUE LOOKING WEST SCALL: REFGa Ut `f 2 ARCHITECTS I ENGINEERS STAMP CITY APPROVALS DRAFT- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION . SCALE: cam LOOKING NORTH ` SCALE' 1 AVE. LOOKING EAST P , BBF_ 4 PIJW eR�x �.�BnAL INIVI� 50%CD SUBMITTAL 11110115 109%0D SUBMITTAL WIS/16 109%SD SUBMITTAL DII19116 No Issue Date ISSUE/REVISIONS STREET ELEVATIONS as NOma -.bn— Iq m,e • JF wwmr. 1593 G4.01 EIM v--� _= _ lf-�.[ I! .11]fl PHASE I '?l -A,` n F_ PARKING LOT J L7.01.05- CONSTRUCTION PLAN ff L4.01.05 - SOILS PLAN L6.01.05- IRRIGATION PLAN L6.01.05 - PLANTING PLAN I l M1• ♦ • • {�� ',_•�t L8.01.05 - SITE FURNIO111NGS PLAN _ I -' • - — — --_ - - - s ' _ 11 _tAl 44 ' 1 1 H 1 I I I I i^yi •- III I iry I t � li•k. 1 ..',.. -ilFnrolworrK. r'Sf'•;.• - 11.01.04 -CONSTRUCTION PLAN L4.01.04- SOILS PLAN �- - L5,0t04-IRRIGATION PLAN L6.01.04 - PLANTING PLAN L8.01.04- SITE FURHIGHINGS PI • r ----------------- a� I � I ♦ , I - - lIMlf of PV07.k - - • :_ M1 r I . L7.01,03 -CONSTRUCTION PLAN L4.01.03 - SOILS PLAN + ` - L501.03 -IRRIGATION PLAN103 ING PLAN I 1 { :• = -- L8.01 03-SITENFURN GHINGSPLAN - `:-.1. 57 `•- Jf • - PHASE I I j PARK - 17.01.02 -CONSTRUCTION PLAN L4.01.02 - SOILS PLAN L5.01.02 - IRRIGATION PLAN 1-6.01.02 - PLANTING PLAN - } L8.01.02 - SITE FURNIGHINGS PLAN; r` , � I 7 }• : �� J•r 1 n [ T. 1 r' {. • l J I ` � i; �PHA1 .I._, L AS11 TI I T = LIBRARY - _f_J=1- - L1.01.01•CONSTRUCTIONPLAN L4.01.01 - SOILS PLAN L5.01.01- IRRIGATION PLAN k _ L6.01.01- PLANTINGPLAN • 18.01.01 -SSITE FURFURNIGHINGS PLAN » 1 I I IN I r TT' / SHEETINDEX L0,01.00 ORIENTATION PLAN LO 01.01 TREE PROTECTION PLAN L1 01.00 CONSTRUCTION LEGEND L1 01.01 CONSTRUCTION PLANS L1.01.02 CONSTRUCTION PLANS 11.01.03 CONSTRUCTION PLANS 11.01.04 CONSTRUCTION PLANS L1.01.05 CONSTRUCTION PLANS 17.01,10 CONSTRUCTION ENLARGEMENTS L2.01-01 SITE SECTIONS L201-02 SITE SECTIONS L2.01.03 SITE SECTIONS L30101 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L30102 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L3.01 03 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L30104 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L4.01.01 SOILS PLAN L4,01.02 SOILS PLAN L4.01.03 SOILS PLAN L4.0t04 SOILS PLAN L4,01.05 SOIL PLANS L8.01.00 PLANTING SCHEDULE L6601.01 PLANTING PLANS 16,01,02 PLANTING PLANS L&01,03 PLANTING PLANS L6.01.04 PLANTING PLANS L&01.05 PLANTING PLANS L7-01,00 PLANTING DETAILS L801.01 SITE FURNISHINGS L801.02 SITE FURNISHINGS L801.03 SITE FURNISHINGS L8-01-04 SITE FURNISHINGS L801.05 SITEFURNISHINGS PLANTING NOTES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BY THE CONTRACTOR 1.MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL BEGIN ON THE FIRST DAY AFTER ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION WORK ON THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE,CHECKED, ACCEPTED AND WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS GIVEN TO BEGIN THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, KWNTE14ANCE PERIOD SHALL CONTINUE THEREAFTER FOR NO LESS THAN 365 CONTINUOUS CALENDAR DAYS - 2 CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL INVOLVED AREAS DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE LANDSCAPING OPERATIONS AND DURING THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD UNTIL THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK 31 VI$OWl1.Y PLB,y1Rfi ApP 1P M'E BY CEOPELNT S OGI TNG, ETTPr N(i, FERPj1�LIZING,ACNT S-SfNONB, PEST$FUILL INhNNELIHY GRVIYINOCONDITIONAND INA NRF �$fA/Y CYIFF1ROlLPIG. 7RAYN:S ENEEDII✓di CLiAFAFF04NP AND OTHER OPERATIONS OF MAINSEWIU, LANDVVA E AREA` 5HALL BE KEPI FREE OFKUIS,NDXIOUS GR45S. ANIIOTNEROHOESlAEOVEGETATNE GHOVYFIi AND DEBRIS, PLANTS FOUND TO BE DEAD OR IN AN IMPAIRED CONDITION SHALL BE REPLACED IMMEDIATELY. 4. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL REQUIRE CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE,CLEANING,ADJUSTMENT, PART REPLACEMENT AND INSPECTION IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THESE SERVICES ON A CONTINUAL AND REGULAR BASIS DURING THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD TO INSURE THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS PROPERLY OPERATED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. 5. COMPLETION DATE OF THE CONTRACT IAIMNTENANCE PERIOD WILL BE EXTENDED, WHEN IN THE OPINION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IMPROPER TAABO[� E UNHEALTHY CONDITIM OF RANTED WNTEANL IS EVIDENT AT THE TERMINATION OF THE SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE PER IOED. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASLUAE LTY FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE UNTIL LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTABLE, & CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF LANDSCAPE AREAS REPAIR DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY GUARANTEES & REPLACEMENTS BY THE CONTRACTOR 1. GUARANTEE TREES, SHRUBS, GROUNDCOVER, AND TURF TO REMAINN6KGTNYJAO MSLY GROWING FOR A PERIOD OF PRST DAY AFTER ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION WORK ON THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE, CHECKED, ACCEPTED AND WRITTENAPPFJMX PRIM THECITY AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTM YEAR MOM COMPLETION DATE OF THE CONTRACT MAINTENANCE PERIOD. 2" PLANTS FOUND TO BE DEAD OR NOT IN VIGOROUS CONDITION AS DETERMINED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NOTED WITHIN THE GUARANTEE PERIOD SHALL BE REPLACE WITHIN 14 DAYS OF NOTIFICATION 4. USE PLANTS FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE SAME KIND AND SIZE AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST. FURNISH, PLANT AND FERTILIZE AS ORIGINALLY SPECIFIED - 5 THE ENTIRE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE TIME OF TURNOVER TO THE OWNER FOLLOWING THE CONTRACT MAINTENANCE PERIOD THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVERALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP OF THE INSTALLATION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER DECLARATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS BEARING THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, FOR ANY REASON, THE USER ACKNOWLEDGES AND ACCEPTS THE FOLLOWING 1. PLANT MATERIAL IS A DYNAMIC, UNPREDICTABLE, LIVING ORGANISM THAT CAN CREATE HAZARDS TO PEOPLE AND BUILT STRUCTURES 2 THIS PROJECT FEATURES PLANTING IN CONTAINERS AND IN SPACES CONFINED ON ALL SIDES BY BUILDING STRUCTURES PLANTS GROWN IN CONTAINERS OF CONFINED SPACES WILL NOT ACHIEVE SIZES OR CHARACTERISTICS AS THE SAME PLANTS GROWN IN UNRESTRICTED, NATURAL CONDITIONS ROOTS WILL GROW TO THE EDGES OF CONFINED AREAS AND MUST BE REGULARLY INSPECTED BY PLANT CARE PROFESSIONALS TO INSURE NO DAMAGE TO THE CONTAINER, BUILDING STRUCTURE, OR WATERPROOFING COMPONENTS 3. PLANT MATERIALS USED ON THIS PROJECT HAVE VARYING WATER USE REOUIR EVENTS THAT ARE DETERMINED FROM SEASON TO SEASON, WEATHER CONDITIONS, TYPE OF PLANT, AND BY LOCATION WATER APPLICATION MAST BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY- PLANT MATERIAL, PLANTING SOIL AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS REQUIRE CONTINUOUS, ON-GOING, PROFESSIONAL MONITORING. IMPROPER MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING CAN LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE MAINTENANCE OF THE WORK REPRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND THEREFORE DISAVOWS ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES CAUSE BY PLANT GROWTH AND/OR THE APPLICATION OF IRRIGATION WATER 4. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HAS HAD NO CONTROL OVER AND TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT OTHER THAN WHAT IS EXPLICITLY ILLUSTRATED ON HE DRAWINGS SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WORK NOTED AS 'BY OTHERS' IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY 5. UNLESS THESE PLANS ARE CLEARLY MARKED 'FOR CONSTRUCTIOWAND BEAR THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHIFECTTHEY MAY NOT BE USED FOR ONST CRUCTION PLANTING GENERAL NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIMSELF FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY COST INCURRED TO DAMAGE OF SAID UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES IF PROPER VERIFICATION BY CONTRACTOR WAS NOT PERFORMED. 2. DO NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH PLANTING OPERATIONS AS DESIGNED WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT OBSTRUCTIONS AND/OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT WERE NOT MOWN DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS -SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY CHANGES DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COORDINATION WITH SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH HIS PLANTING OPERATIONS 4. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE SPECIFICATIONS, NOTES AND PIANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION E _ 5. IF CONFLICTS ARISE BETWEEN THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE AREAS ON THE SITE AND THE DRAWINGS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR RESOLUTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION 6- THE CONTRACTOR IS TO RECEIVE THE ON -GRADE PORTION OF THE SITE WITHIN.I OFA FOOT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A LETTER OF GRADE CERTIFICATION FROM THE OWNER PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK 7. AFTER FINISH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR ALL ON -GRADE PLANTING AREAS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TESTED BY AQUALIFIED SOILS TESTING LABORATORY FOR SOIL FERTILITY, AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY, AND SOIL PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUESTED TO AMEND THE SOIL TO CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATION& HOWEVER ANY AMENDMENT THAT MIG HT BE REQUESTED OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY BE UPON RECEIPT OF A WRIT TEN CHANGE ORDER o FROM THE OWNER B REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANTING REQUIREMENTS, MATERIALS, AND EXECUTION 9. ALL TREES SHALL BE TAGGED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AS PER SPECS. 10 FINAL LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS BEFORE BEGINNING PLANTING OPERATIONS oBOLLARDS- STAKE ALL BOLLARD AND TREE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BOLLARD CONSTRUCTION FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY BOLLARD INSTALLED WITHOUT ITS FINAL LOCATION APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS SUBJECT TO RELOCATION AT THE SOLE EXPENSE OFTHE CONTRACTOR SHRUBS- STAKE OUT ALL PLANTING BEDS AND THE LAY OUT OF ACTUAL CONTAINER LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ONS ITE PHIOR TO DIGGING HOLES FOR PLANTING. TREES- STAKE ALL TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DIGGING HOLES. ANY TREE PLANTED WITHOUT ITS FINAL LOCATION APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS SUBJECT TO RELOCATION AT THE SOLE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR ENSURE PROPER COORDINATION OF ALL FOOTINGS, BOLLARDS, SUB -STRUCTURE, AND UTILITIES. ELECTRICAL -STAKE THE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION REVIEW WITH PROPOSED TREE STAKING MENTIONEDABOVE ANY SITE LIGHTING INSTALLED WITHOUT ITS FINAL LOCATION APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS SUBJECT TO RELOCATION AT THE SOLE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. 12. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIAL FREE OF PEST OR PLANT DISEASES PRE -SELECTED 'TAGGED" PLANT MATERIAL MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND BE CERTIFIED PEST AND DISEASE FREE IT IS THE CONTRACTORS OBLIGATION TO WARRANTY THE PLANT MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS 13 ALL SHRUB AND GROUND COVER AREAS (EXCLUDING TURF AND SLOPE AREAS) ARE TO BE MULCHED WITH WOOD PER SPECIFICATIONS, REFER TO THE DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFIC '^ LOCATIONS. _ 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALWAYS ASSUME THE SMALLER SIZE OF EACH PLANT WHEN A RANGE IS GIVEN CONCERNING SPACING LG, PLANT TYPE X IS I2'TO 18'WIDE. THE w CONTRACTOR SHALL USE I2 -(THE SMALLER SIZE) TO ESTIMATE PLANTS REQUIRED TO FILL ANY GIVEN AREA, PLANT SCHEDULE TRES fA1E GK IlOA NMRlIp1MGR1My ICit EkKRR 11191X1 — NORM MEMARNB — As u rtADMSaucnw,wIMAMACADu axaX G� V tl OUNpµPAXM1LOAA/WIIRYAW Y/uLET D6 BO% a -Ir ,2!"1 NP M KOEIIWEjIM MYNGIC1uERELEWpIMF a Bu, OS A OWlNA9M.{"FrpUXAW'1MIER'f,R�f.RM EFq BC N panxac"mm51G/DTIINESEPISTADIE EB'BOX -X IT -W P1A N hA1XNFFMDIFANUEIppTY F+LN.FIOAE TNI PM 1 m 071RGFAOAIDNL'FCa1YTM—o nuERcusAGRIFOLw/DNsruuEOMI to Box IGX 1/Iv-/"'�I, UE t NIhXCUSENGEIWMIIIIFNSEILMIX OAK tiP BOX WIF fla 1 W91CIbER1iEUANRN,ExBi1/AxIN DAK .IC BOX SHRUBAREAS1UBARAX/EAS]S COBE -FY FWaAILIENJWMMy R men No AR% PCo 310 APIUIIIT•1)dG01XWFµu'1IMAVXNAt1ri[AAi DME _ F6ALy 36 O.G S%B 6-B' ULLIDENSE E7 ACIAW TTEXUM BWEF—E IBDUEFL N AGWE SGML ,2P0 GLARY" i -w TTELFXRR WAMLUc FIIDAOE 59AL wDu cy 'RT FULL/DERSE -s. �' A1A N KLOEBNRBMI056/MFDLiIRALa &GAL 24 D.G 2'-T '2-8 IULL/DENSE 1wP ]W MISIHMPURPIpFA/PURPLE 9HREEAwx 9NL Ir OC IYLL FPERN f 1 A SARIUPSISMINKTA/C/AFUMA IWIL Trot TDu ]TAnSE IBOB � — - ROn1A�11LMbihlxRd1151tAXE1R0E$RY 1610. 3P01 FBLL/DENSE . F]f IF'RAU$MXU9i5W1O5 T'MrwIPBPCF/xA1rvFBWERYE ID& :NOG 73 r•5 1'ULL/DENSE •F7 pp4lllM fLENWAIFIRRSTS PXCCi vNR SGPL :360.6 38 TX Fal _.• - ;ti RHC 1169 $G& 'A"DI;. rs rW MLTDENSE •.:• -•,VEL 18E '.K1ITpKl�AC✓w,'fi LA 41K"EIRAf,IX�[IR 5LKL '9'D 77-77,_ BIONETFNna1 COOS Gtr mxVRi iRMI 10F1R CCI9-MIX II = li W 11011 FORM 'REMANKS • cm 15w (;AwDNDPFDALUMTECTORUM,GPEROSH IGAL woc 104LOMM - LOL Lr99 Yl1A.gBAIAIFgw ■STR'fON'FNMM RIRt 96R trot • 3 r•r BDLLiDERSE (AUR 1]99 ywlFq/plLlgp{E 1GpX OGOf (60. IYO.G Z3 Z -T INLI/DENSE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SCHEDULE LAXOLC+IEw" S901IU1 OPLIRtl1Fa YXR11E II/P1 �1E EKC DECOMP SDGRANDE DROMPOSEDENNNINGINVEL COMP G NATURAL I'UEEPTYP. -3fl..- r�� .N IQ MW MEN MEMOS ----------- MARSH ���I EVA• PLANYING QUICK LEGEND 0 7---r--7 (B 5 10 20 SCALE: 1 "=10'4' THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT IQ JON A -hi -1--d U,b— D.,, ­ CONSULTING ENGINEERS cm AwaovAtws DRAFT- NOT RAFT-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION www"61 HIM om W-10ITA}. 08115.16 fA�ll w w7 & "'I" 11WR PLANTING PLANS MWWd -- Now 110,NIB BI, Isle. 11p1 L6.01.01 vZ 2, MW UNA APW4 MEM �y1'�•�'y�j•�. �"Y 'i yf;Pr' _ gi[Iifii1HMii?" +gy � IifliilElie� ii �'=�'j � ► [ "zj�`"¢]n'�; a"�i81di °oi'e� �� T •7Y � .. �1. iujlslul9ur�u�l � j a 3i&liil�� x. • +. �.j>•• �. � a�`f r} ;e�sl::���lidiillflii ryi�j � E i�fa;e3• �"� 1� �� �� � ti� - \j �'ii il:iLilii if iE�ji¢ I ppf f"Z-e323"i ka ¢ �•. }�'�.. .. �,t��\• � ��ii'i 1 i IrUiiuiili3:ul:i �' 9�7[�f"oi'37!��'f ,y � � ♦ +'I 1�0`�fO1,r� �r+�- .~ I fA�f f"oEaE"yi"ai�d19!Ef!! �, � F� SII■I.��c= �� � ; � �. E nw�.a • . 1:_ .......... ga. M1 P1 14 11 �3tli �yl�::,:i-`''-iCi': ii:fl'. Il�ll llil■ ...�, l DRAFT - NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION ���lllllilll ■i � �„ �■ Jilli I ■ �. -91 MEN ■ 1110 ■� ■■�•�� ISI 11 PI _ �� PLANTING QUICK LEGEND Xwl./yrrN,l ylw 1 rrer.r.+r.lxew �rlw r.. I`!f rwxwrulyr+.ewwex., k 0 51_20 — . / SCALE: 1'=10'-0" THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCMECT tlu is" A-hii—i--d uls.. D—g. BBBB Blac uar-1G—. Flwr rcM. cA sonz Ilei) 310bi9-51]0 IFax) 310d5Bd}ZO CONSULTING ENGINEERS ®JohrsoOFavaro.1SbP�e�ro�• - MON.= fpWFLF6StAw.— �T y , � M unf" DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISION 31— RycsO>IAIIMna amil 10 SO SI Wni WISH. w Mu. wt. ISSUE f REVIB1Of15 PLANTING PLANS was AsN d — Novem 110.ml. awv+�n ED rw.a. IYP L6.01.03 f!M — - f PLAWING QUICK LEGEND � � i � i ,aff...np, W NN (D L W— G) L I Aw. I . ...=N - 14 % OF WORK r --f L r _4 r -P LJ — ------------- o 00 #77� RIF � ,0 5 10 20 T SCALE: V=10'4' THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARC"TECT (T.Q31M—M(F.Q310—M CONSULTING ENGINEERS CITY APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR RAFT-NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION I Ip w SLBN"AL MM61 PLANTING PLANS awe A,Wt,d w Nw.eMzltlftlg BD L6.01.04 Bim I - ..i . - . FL I 0 1 1r0 � �-1--j SCALE: 1 O W-0" w THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t u 18 N A—hil—l— Bye U,b— sere o�M CM�cA°1-2 (re1)31665B- (F.)3 -- CONSULTING ENGINEERS ®JMrtaon Favam Aly- �� MMR4'+ilTueue,,,,,ax NMW CITY AIR.Un DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION —f REVISIONOI I PIAN CHECK 6IBMR IMM6 PLANTING PLANS � NNoktl wre NovembarlO, AfB L6.01.05 m A1.01 - 2 - EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE - PHASE 1 SCALE: "I 0 {I 1 1 REF f CTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 SCALE: p101 2 THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT [%uki 8 N Aichf?e P-• and UfLan Daafl� see e�w„eua,so-�� o���a Fm. rrarcM.cmm�4 ,)--M(Fa)3I0a59an0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS ®JO—F-2015 AncmgCP8! E11B%EERa %TAMP CITY APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIONa1 1 PIAN CHECK SUBMITTAL 12118'151 0911515 1 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 auvx a. JF wxiwrv. A1.01 m �r —f s ply. .h : -Yc1 j PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT N Arcbileclure end Urben Deslpn 5bI9 BIeeMwtler Sees mzi3M Fba aAercMcA . 1ie113166585]A (Fm)310559dT20 CONSULTING ENGINEERS A1.02 - EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE - PHASE 1 SCALE: A. 1 f OJo .,Fever M5 REF ABTM'i[4T'8lEW�k.EH'B STIYaa I I. � - k --` �IY ,G`..• _—.. ]cN '. i1 :_ .1. e•:ti -i '~�� A1.02 - EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 SCALE: A1D t`2 ! GTY APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I�e,daoNal PIAN CHECK SUBMITTAL M0116 SUBMITTAL 1111dtfi 100%OD SUBMITTAL 06�1Y16 100%SD SUBMTTAL 04 E: W. Issue Date EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 auE AS Nob]tl wre: December 16.28,6 owwm JF aramen — A1.02 BIM -- - �— 1 _ t M -,j FE A1.03 - 2 -EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS -PHASE 1 SCALE: REPAtm 1 PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT N (/e1131uasss/1a l �IJtob��� CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS I ENGINEER'S STAMP 11 um: -1Emil I I • .{ .�" - ,.:;._ ,.� :. ---. •rrz, r ; -- --- - __ • , - - " CITY APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIIXJet PL NCHECKSUBMITTAL 1TIN16 5096 CD SUBMITTAL illimis —DD SUBMITTAL GN1w16 Iw%SD SUBMITTAL Mall. No. Issue Date ISSUE/REVISIONS EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 _•,= AS Notetl nre December 19, 201fi JF mortar 15BB A1.03 - EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 SCALE: I 2 BIM RA EF. l a aaaoe�o� � o�croc.v moo � ��ovavvvvo A1.04 - EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 - LIBRARY EAST A1.04 - EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 - LIBRARY WEST PRWECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t%vgi 8 N A-hllecN ad UFheO Deaiga 5&t36LxNxetlx6treeL M2 Fbor (W)3105R—(F.)310S63 M CONSULTING ENGINEERS eJalman wA1aw101l�wrv.n.e..a ARCHITECTS l ENGINEER'S STAMP GttAPPROVAIS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIDN01 PIANCHECKSI-MuTTAL 1]/13'16 SO'4 co RUQSMA j si m 100%00 SUBMITTAL 08'15'16 100%SD SUBMITTAL "19116 Nw Issue Date ISSUEIREVISIDN5 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 �•,= A.% — D¢ .N,19,2016 wuw�m JF wwEcr. 1503 A1.04 BIM A1.04 - EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 - KIOSK 1 I SCALE: —49— A1.04 - EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 - KIOSK 2"LE 1 2 THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT `N' �upis Arch ilecl— end Urbl, DBdiBB so -eel B�mmFlmr CLMrCRy, F%1=1 ITel131obsssm (F%1=1— CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0JOI—.F-2015 �3 AAUT 1 CC: S, FIY.10KEIM nTS GTTAWROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I 50%OD SUBMITTAL 11H01T8 100%OO SUBMITTAL OY15I1B I 100%SO SUBMITTAL mme EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE 1 - KIOSK A3%o —: December 1B, 201B auvx m. JF aasuvn momr 1503 A1.05 ���V�flw�ItVf_t� y 7r - u v v I _ _ N --)_'@19f NNNN\\\1\\\x\3t Z\NNN' tit —.4z - SITE .4 V SCALE: "111P SITE PLAN -PHASE 1 &PHASE 2 OVERALL LOT REF. X216 1 PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT 1�u�i8l A—hil—I... —d Ur6e0 D,,ig, Re113loassa,p IF�13,���� CONSULTING ENGINEERS -------- LOCM NOFSECOND STORY WIN -M LOT AREA: 563,293 SOFT OPENSPACE AREA: 444,633 SOFT, TOTALBUILDING ;7J=F-1.201'1 AREA(NEWAND 53,442SOFT BUSTING): ARCIOTECTS/ ENGINEER'S STAMP DRIVEWAY/OPEN PARKING AREA: 65,218 SOFT STREET PARKING REA: 24,734 SOFT GTIAWP VALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN - OVERALL LOT P•,. A-1. ... oe.w6r tv, MlO JF w�cuu n. nwecr. 1503 A1.11A BIM { I� ~ PARK AVE WIDTH: 15'- 0" O l N ` 3 ANAHEIM AVF WIDTH: 19'-11' 11111 1'�:I� o N M. c N A1.11 - SITE PLAN - PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 SCALE: wtm PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT 1%upis, Archlleclure entl Ur ben Design 509A So-eeL Gmuna Fbw I.erc�ry_cq so2T2 (Te031osbssTm IFaxl Bloes9azm CONSULTING ENGINEERS fl xfnNn l.�v�A01 y' ww.w.�a ARCMTECTB I ENGINEER'S STAMP OW APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION msto autu,nAi ,un,rt 100%DD SUBMITTAL Od1Y1B 100%SID SUBMITTAL 04,9/,8 Nu Mue Me nnc ISSUEIREVISIONS SITE PLAN - PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 �+E AS No —1 De —W,19.2016 oruvxm JF wccxmrt A1.11B BIM L–PARK AVE VVIDTH:79`-b--------o'-------------------- r QO N A1.12 - SITE PLAN - PHASE 1 - LIBRARY I SCALE: un THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT N A rchileclure end Urban Design 5&99 S�acMwtler Slreel Gmuntl Fbor hxrcMc (F )3101 ell31g659d1.ro IFu13195999Y1g CONSULTING ENGINEERS ®John FEEL' E 1015 ARCHITECTS / ENGINEER'S STAMI CITY A -- DRAFT - NOT PPROVALSDRAFT- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 PIANCHECKSUEMITTAL 1tysI SITE PLAN - PHASE 1 %c+F As Nolad w. oeoener 10,701e ceuwn JF c„KRcu er - m.. Ism LImm BIM I ANAHEIM AVE WIDTH: 19' -ill, - _,_.__.._.._-...._..�.�—. L–PARK AVE VVIDTH:79`-b--------o'-------------------- r QO N A1.12 - SITE PLAN - PHASE 1 - LIBRARY I SCALE: un THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT N A rchileclure end Urban Design 5&99 S�acMwtler Slreel Gmuntl Fbor hxrcMc (F )3101 ell31g659d1.ro IFu13195999Y1g CONSULTING ENGINEERS ®John FEEL' E 1015 ARCHITECTS / ENGINEER'S STAMI CITY A -- DRAFT - NOT PPROVALSDRAFT- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 PIANCHECKSUEMITTAL 1tysI SITE PLAN - PHASE 1 %c+F As Nolad w. oeoener 10,701e ceuwn JF c„KRcu er - m.. Ism LImm BIM I . - s :'It I to LX' I z A2.11 - LIBRARY FIRST FLOOR PLAN I : SCALE 1Az„ THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT Augio" Architecture end Ur6en Oeaipn 5090 BIa��Bx Seea, GmuM Fbw (�ell31ad59a]A IFar1 aIa659dY1a CONSULTING ENGINEERS OJ1MLeh Fa•xn blE�w�rv•i •ems ARCHITECTS/ ENGINEERS STAMP OW APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 10 DO SUBMITTAL GB1-1 W. ISSUE Data ISSUE/REVISIONS LIBRARY FIRST FLOOR PLAN e... As Noted n,E Oerember l8, ]018 aww rv. I.JF o�un rv. A2.11 :'It I to f R . z �J r a r I Ita 1 � T (0 —� I ,I I LX' I z A2.11 - LIBRARY FIRST FLOOR PLAN I : SCALE 1Az„ THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT Augio" Architecture end Ur6en Oeaipn 5090 BIa��Bx Seea, GmuM Fbw (�ell31ad59a]A IFar1 aIa659dY1a CONSULTING ENGINEERS OJ1MLeh Fa•xn blE�w�rv•i •ems ARCHITECTS/ ENGINEERS STAMP OW APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 10 DO SUBMITTAL GB1-1 W. ISSUE Data ISSUE/REVISIONS LIBRARY FIRST FLOOR PLAN e... As Noted n,E Oerember l8, ]018 aww rv. I.JF o�un rv. A2.11 I I I I I I I I M. I 1 I I SCALE: A2.12 - LIBRARY - SECOND FLOOR PLAN Az1z Ile"=1'V' REF. A911C 1 . KEYNOTES INM Tle PROJECT Anh UP THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t�v�is N Arc hlleclure entl Urben Des/pn SF9B &acAwtler Street CmuM Fbw OfMr QIY, CA 96Zi3 (iep 31pS59fi]ID IFm)310559dzZb CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS / ENGINEER'S STAMP CITY APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION e0%CD SUBMITTAL 11I1B'16 100%00 SU MTTAL M1S15 100%SD SUBMITTAL "We W. Issue Date 6]D[f LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR PLAN a.. MW .... Dec.mlar l�.�pin omvw n. JF mortcr. 1— A2.12 BIM PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS f I I 1 1 I ARCHITECT I I I I ! [ N I I I i I I a rc hilecrure ena urban Dealpn I I sass el.rxw.u.soul o�mum Fw q N�5 I (Tap 3i�c�7p ff®03I065eaIl0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS I � I 3 n I mp i�- I I I - - — - — - - - - -- •-----.o.. - — I I _ •r ~n loll - ®Jain Fawm2015~W aRCHTECTS IENWlEER55TIWP 1 R L i I I IF , aTrnPPRovA,s I "• '* I DRAFT - �� +4 - - _ NOT FOR r I i I CONSTRUCTION REVISION01 � I A].15 .q N1 a].13 PIANCH CKSUB ITT 1X18',6 yyy CD p1) n& 1111.16 100%00 SUBMITTAL OM16U6 100%SD SIIBMTTAI Opt.le Na, issue Date ISSUEJR ISIOlLS LIBRARY MEZZANINE PLAN auras JF neuo-vw _ -53 ( A2.13 1503 - MEZZANINE PLAN LIBRARY"LE' 1H'=1'L' REF ATIfiC BIM 1503 - ROOF PLAN LIBRARY SCALE: A210 1I3"=1'-0' REF. /511 1 KEYNOTES yNA - �� 1ii1 PROJECT DRAM MODVQTRDW SKYLBGM THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT A�Rio" Archile0lure end Urb— D—ig, —M— M Str«t Gmerd Fbor Mer q.CA80232 RaB 310b59bT20 IFer1310559E220 CONSULTING ENGINEERS BJOMman Femoro 2015 ARCHITECTS I ENGINEER'S STAMP 1 PIANCHECKSUBMITTAL 12J18/161 LIBRARY ROOF PLAN Q.= MWn.,E December 1B, 2016 w,wrrc JF oaimrc. — mocc.. 150:1 A2.14 GTYAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RENSION 01 GENERAL NOTES: A SEE A10 16 FOR ROOFING DETAILS 1 PIANCHECKSUBMITTAL 12J18/161 LIBRARY ROOF PLAN Q.= MWn.,E December 1B, 2016 w,wrrc JF oaimrc. — mocc.. 150:1 A2.14 1 UB. EL ROOF 1 3 32-37-9 ' LIB EL — MEUANIN_E26( IIJ 121'21' S" UB EL SECOND US EL GROUND I I LIBRARY NORTH ELEVATION scALE: — aD�?egeenL �� 4z -r a I V I US EL ROOF .. I I LIB EL MEZZANIPE ~-_Lj r l l ________________� 1111tl16 OBIISNB e mole % Issue I I I LIBRARY ELEVATIONS ] rU.E As Noled art Ocambsr l9, 2016 wwwn JF osaert. — ------� 141 I II II I ] I I � :.�-.[_].•��l � : _'fir:;.. $fli." :1_•.,.r;..� .,f, - .�,. i.c^. 1 UB. EL ROOF 1 3 32-37-9 ' LIB EL — MEUANIN_E26( IIJ 121'21' S" UB EL SECOND US EL GROUND I I LIBRARY NORTH ELEVATION scALE: — aD�?egeenL �� 4z -r a I V I US EL ROOF .. I I LIB EL MEZZANIPE ~-_Lj r l l ________________� 1111tl16 OBIISNB e mole % Issue I I LIBRARY ELEVATIONS US EL SECOND rU.E As Noled art Ocambsr l9, 2016 wwwn JF osaert. — ------� 141 I II II I ; 1 US EL GROUND 2r ;i 1.13 1?✓i3-1411 rr,iu11-j!s.ii-4.!'�i .!.! D" ;L 4 -�' LIBRARY EAST ELEVATION SCALE: MI6 -,�• 1 2 KEYNOTES x �u-rlrr. Fdiriuu�v� FAw.eSiw6�.iu:{'• ��wna I: x6m s ry � exr�uanouallo. lidrirrvN4r cvr to sxr JOIR' fRAIELFN' r THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT Affi8N Arc h i I., lure end Urban Dea iy6 —@acM s—'swdRmr m 118031USS954.-2 1x10:.0" 0:.0"-- CONSULTING ENGINEERS .Johnson Fo. 2015 ARCMTECT'6l ENGINEENSSTAW GTY AIVRWALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REN61on01 5016 w 6UBMRAL IM6 w S1)BMT1AL 1111tl16 OBIISNB 1W SD SIAMT mole % Issue Det. aw>o r LIBRARY ELEVATIONS rU.E As Noled art Ocambsr l9, 2016 wwwn JF osaert. mo.n. 1503 A5.11 BIM u 11 11 IV !i -t! CML NORTH ELEVATION I SCALE: RE A 1 CML EAST ELEVATION I SCALE: REm A 2 KEYNOTES V1111M Kurnpl.TeetS THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT �%upi8 N . r. nr1.01 rrr n n.0 Yr ern O..I O n see o-re� 6 usFwo� c0 cA W23232 nz (rep aiss vio IFz.I a lawsano CONSULTING ENGINEERS ®JOM1rson Favaro 20150.p��� �� ARCHITECTS I ENGINEER'S STAMP CITY APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISION 01 I sftc6llldm i 11110116 LIBRARY ELEVATIONS (RENDERED) sx. Aa Nokd Mir Lkprr�.r l9, i0lC owwar. JF --mar _ mwm� r 1503 A5.11A BIM --- l -- ----------1—_- l _ _ __ __--------�------- _ T.O STAIR fi_OOF PARAPET — �r �� _ __ � __�� ��� _ �� � _ �� _ � � _ _� �—"-T,O�STAIR ROOF 102':3'— I I I I I t [ I [ LIB EL ROOF I t i I r 1 I I I 1 I US EL ��—�—�------------------------_«w—_ -- — —-- -- I ! I I I I I I I 11 [ 1 US EL SECOND 11o'h4'-1� -A" I I I 1 I LIB EL GRQOV.NeD SCALE: "512 LIBRARY SOUTH ELEVATION REF. 1 3 6=1d 1 2 2 Ai.12 P o T I I I I LIB EL ROOF 1Yr-P LIB EL -- MEZZANINE (26'-0?') 121' - 5' US ESL SECOND 17�t1�e LIB EL GROUND LIBRARY WEST ELEVATION RFP 2 I�YNOTES 1 �t �mpupFSS' H11 f NPkOF VMAI t 9IilW\YIQI GP,S£E SmLcryRAI ar-t,s IIYoTiI 0.ASRi1 PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t�vgio N A-hlleclara end Urban D-1ga sere al.dd„wax s°a.e cxum roor (rM 31o5Nseart°M�(Fu, 3�l5rdssazm CONSULTING ENGINEERS �. oa°Ma°n F°rano zB1s RCHITECTS I ENGINEER'S STAMP GTTAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 141;1 .101 50%CD SUBMITTAL 11I1N18 _ I& M SUBMITTAL U5�15�18 100%SD SUBMITTAL ONi" iao Issue Date ISSUE I REVISIONS LIBRARY ELEVATIONS MW- JF sW-JF no�cr. 1503 A5.12 BIM CML SOUTH ELEVATIONSCALE:FEF� l ..' O10 CML WEST ELEVATION ISCALE: I ° v V. 2 1•=1.0• REF KEYNOTES K4V— x 76x9 ��Ci WPR [�W1NGL eLrrr.rowr, FRWELEBS EXTERIOR GLAZING/ BUTT JOINT, FRAMELESS, CUT TO SHAPE OF VAULT i 11 G - WALL CHP, SEEiMPn URAL DETAILS +,SMOOTM TRCMEi. FINW THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t�vgis N A-hil-1— end UrbeR D—il Sava aculzracM. cA soi32na imr R.09Ias 5720 (F-)albean CONSULTING ENGINEERS n Iohmon Frw+a Ali : 6-�.Mm•� ARCHITECTS I ENGINEERS STAMP CITYAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 PIAN CHECK Ij SUBMITTAL — 1]/19116 ECL-y$LONR�IL 11110116 LIBRARY ELEVATIONS (RENDERED) g..c As NoleC " M...1d11g9016 aiwwn JF o�mnme, .awe 1901 A5.12A Al B.1 C.1 D-1 E.1 KIOSK NORTH ELEVATION I SCALE: I Ae 11 (/ -.=-11� my k[1 I KIOSK SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: I — .-1.-0�. uw 3 KIOSK EAST ELEVATION SCALE: I m" 1M'=—. PFI A2'11 S9 -- KIOSK WEST ELEVATION I SCALE: "� �. srw 4 KEYNOTES w PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT Rv�io N A -hili— end Urban Oasien 5fl5e emcwreB.reaeel cmuna FNw Nerclry.Cnlp1J] ITN)310d59d]30 1Fex131ad59dza CONSULTING ENGINEERS ®Johnson Favero 2015~ ���� ARCf[TECNilItFn11EEN9 BTAW GTYAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION M CD SUBMITTAL illivie 1o0% DO SUBMITTAL DM1wi. toe%SD SUBMITTAL -15'18 No Issue Date ISSUE I REVISIONS PARK KIOSK ELEVATIONS / VIEWS = ASNoled T,Mcampp 10.74!11 wvx n. JF wean n. moon. 150.9 A6.11 BIM KIOSK NORTH ELEVATION I SCALE: REEL 6'A V KIOSK SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: I —A r -T... REF KEYNOTES Key Value I Keynote Teat AL S G E; PAINTED TO MATCH S" -1 REVEAL AT BASE SERVICE COUNTER; SMOOTH MARBLE FINISH P1$ SMOOTH nM1RKgrLFINISH GREY PLASTER 5 174" ALUMINUT'I JOTTT EX ERIORROORS PAJNT070 MATCH DARK.GPZ( PLASTER i E kFMOR VENTS PAINTED YO MATCH DARKCWEY PLASTFR PRDJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT 1%u�io N A-hi—t-e eeC U,ben Desl9e 5890 Fvreleery � oor (T.D3le56 201Fxx73tLL55-0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS KIOSK EAST ELEVATION SCALE: A6"A 2 ®Johnson Favaro 2015 ew^��� ARCHITECTS I ENGINEERS STAMP C. J — CITYAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISION 01 PI -AN CHECK SUBMITTAL 1/19116 eitmYslTLV 11,10.1. 1W% DD SUBMITTAL 08/15`18 100% SD SUBMITTAL WINK No Issue Date ISSUE—VISIONS PARK KIOSK ELEVATIONS / VIEWS RENDERED �E as Nmaa yw CFambnl/1TIM • JF wuamar .. 1503 A6.11 A L�1,� KIOSK WEST ELEVATION SCALE: Fs1,A 4 LIM THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS PHASE ONE ARCHITECT �10io" LIBRARY DRAWING CONTENTS:°��.�As°""°` A -h-11110 and UrheO Design Rell ato-ssssna IPe.l atassgezm CONSULTING ENGINEERS SG1.01 - Type and Color SG1.02 - Sign Types SG1.03 - Sign Summary SG1.04 - Sign Summary SG1.05 - Sign Summary SG1.06 - Sign Location Plan, Site SG1.07 - Sign Location Plan, Library 1st Floor SG1.08 - Sign Location Plan, Library 2nd Floor SG1.09 - Sign Location Plan, Caf6 �J,hn.n ­ S SG1.10 - Sign Schedule, Site and Caf6 ARCHITECTS1 ENGINEERS STAMP SG1.11 - Sign Schedule, Library SG1.12 - Site ID, Site Directional SG1.13 - Site Directional (One Sided), Library Building ID (North) C—PPROVALS SG1.14 - Library Building ID (North), Library Building ID (South/East) SG1.15 - Secondary Building ID, Children' Area ID SG 1.16 - Teen's Area ID, Friends of the Library ID SG1.17 - Friends of the Library ID REVISIONOI SG 1.18 - Information Desk, Entrance Information ---- SG1.19 - Library Restroom Room ID, Library Restroom Title 24, Library Room ID, Maximum Occupancy SG1.20 - Library Wall Directional, Emergency Exit Sign, Stairwell ID, Free-standing Directional -- SG1.21 - ISA Entry Symbol, No Smoking Symbol, Library End Panel, Elevator Emergency Exit Sign SG1.22 - Vestibule Directional, Elevator Directory, ADA Parking Sign, ADA Parking Symbol, PIANCHECKSUGMffTAI 1VI911E I w m N.1I/RAL WWI SG1.23 - Caf6 Building ID OMSD SURMmAL OONSLH 100%D SUBMRTAL 09N9/IE LIONS PARK PROJECTS TYPE/COLOR s -..E As Naled x pRwO�aly:•�• nasi. 1503 SG1.00 Gotham Narrow Medium ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Gotham Medium ABCDEFGH IJKLM NOPORSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Gotham Bold ABCD E FGH IJ KLM NOPORSTU VWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Gill Sans ABCDEFG H IJ KLM NOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghi jklmnopgrstuvwxyz Cooper Black AB CDEFO HIJ KLMN OP QR STU V W XY'Z abcdeFghij klmnopgrstuvWxyz AL C94, M85, Y25, K11 Mythical B60 CO, M80, Y95, KO 40 TawnyDayLily C47, M4, Y100, KO 4D LimeGreen C35, M4, Y100, KO 0 BrightLime _ � 2 - C14, MO, Y74, KO LimeLight CO. M55. Y98, KO OrangeJuice CO, M31, Y100, KO GoldenNugget C7, M17,Y91, KO Yolk CO, MO, Y0, K100 14 CO, MO, Y0, KO C58, M40, Y38, K5 0 Montipere CO, MO, Y0, K80 80% Black 13 Die cut vinyl 3M Frosted Crystal C58, M65, Y70, K64 ID 3M Frosted Crystal C100, MO, Y0, KO 4D 3M Frosted Crystal C44, M98, Y3, KO ID 3M Frosted Crystal M -W THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT N Archif"I re and U,b- Design 59 KKlderyve»gc�ra�uM r (Ten -M-0 (-) 31asss ezeo CONSULTING ENGINEERS axMwn:r,aio AASH ,�••v ApCIMfE ,v 01Ms Si,WP C"APPROVALS PLRN CHECKsuBY & lCO CO Si.9IfAl�L Wva .fnyA1 16 DO S-& Al- Al gNgg ,o w SUBAIr - OsnOAAA He I661A6oI0 �f&E, R_�IA6�ONf LIONS PARK PROJECTS TYPE/COLOR �� AS Noted v+e December 20. 2016 SG 1.01 BIM G THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS LIONS PARK PROJECTS SIGN TYPES zrE AS NoIeE yr December 20 2018 zas, 1503 �n SG 1.02 W � BIM Building ID (Site) Wall Directional ARCHITECT N 1N[]i1 Site Directional ' Exit, Exit Directional [%Uki 8 a.vnrnvr.... a.e.n vwpn IV casae . ,,saw .W , i r c0 cA (TM) ssysn0 .1 s>e lFe.l III -1M F Site Directional (One Sided) Stairwell ID / Emergency Exit CONSULTING ENGINEERS Q1 Building ID Free-standing Directional Secondary Building ID ISA Symbol Area ID No Smoking Symbol m�,�•-� �, �, Information Desk End Panels � Jobnrvn Favem 2015 v�a.n ieee N06: l:aa Entrance Information BN18 1.00 Emergency Exit Elevator Restroom ID Vestibule Directional -APPROVALS Restroom ID (Title 24) Elevator Directory REvvroNnr a Room ID ADA Parking Sign Maximum Occupancy ADA Parking Icon PLAN CHECK SDDMfITAL 1&10110 LIONS PARK PROJECTS SIGN TYPES zrE AS NoIeE yr December 20 2018 zas, 1503 �n SG 1.02 W � BIM F- LIBRARY BNO1 Building ID, North Side (Library) BNO1 Building ID, SE Side (Library) FRIENDS THE RVAR OF LIBRARY READ-09SEf° VE-AMEdE-REG°Q'UZE BN03 Area ID (Friends of the Library) ..- AM� rf n *== emu.r�1n p�tn 9pp An 101 nI Y fOY n BN05 Library Information MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY 299 BN09 Maximum Occupancy BN03 Area ID (Children) O n n MEN VVIDMEN BN06 Restroom ID (Library) T Staff Restrooms Adams Room BN10 Directional Sign QOOH BN02 Secondary Building ID, Multipurpose BN03 Area ID (Teen) BN07 Restroom ID, Title 24 (Library) EXIT ROUTE BN11 Exit Route .__.49 5 aDQ[M's ROOM M BN02 Secondary Building ID, Meeting (:) ASK ME A QUESTION BN04 Information Desk STAFF WORKROOM BN08 Room ID 2 ITHROUGH MEZZANINE NO ROOF ACCESS EXIT DOWN TO LEVEL I BN12 Stairwell ID, Emergency Exit PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT fmio, A,,hif—.,. —d U,ben Design MMm mr ITeil9iass95rzo.,Ful ar ssanm CONSULTING ENGINEERS O.khmnPrvxm ]015b�9� ms ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS STAMP CITVAPPROVALS INIHIC w o0 LIONS PARK PROJECTS SIGN TYPES xxe ASNItM .•. DA7r�&Me wa+. Ifm SG1.03 RIM Ad,., Ams AAAdree's Asn Pesuoons de.n CRK1wss S'dY AspFs Yrc,.fl Psem BN13 Freestanding Directional Sign W -f - IN CASE OF FIRE 00 NOT USE ELEVATOR- USE EXIT STAIRS BN18 Emergency Exit, Elevator BN21 ADA Parking Icon C� BN14 ISA Symbol ADAMS ROOM F RESTROOMS BN19 Vestibule Directional BN15 No Smoking Symbol LEVEL I Circulation Desk Information Fiction LEVEL 2 Non-fiction Periodicals BN20 Elevator Directory BN16 End Panel 7 BN21 ADA Parking sign A>� THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT NO& 8 N -hi-Is. and Urban Design Rep sios gsna Irul �o ssaezm CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARCHRECTS I ENGINEERS STAMP CNVAPPROVALS m•. co a,rm.IErrAL Iw1ANd 100%DD SURMRiAL A41N0 LIONS PARK PROJECTS SIGN TYPES AS Noled wN On�.�.td.�+6 �ae:r• 1503 SG1.05 BIM SITE PLAN N Scale - 1" = 30' -0- THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT AUio" AFchilecluie end Urban O—a 5998 'ea Si_ Iie11310.5545128 (FMI ]16559 B]IO CONSULTING ENGINEERS �JonnsmF.v'.701S ARCHITECTS I ENGINEERS STAMP CITU APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN - PHASE PHASE 1 �� AS Ndetl >n Ne.wNw l0.>bw ouxxer. JF wrrxoer. – mel. Iso) A1.06 IM 0 Building ID (Site) 54Wt Site Directional u. Site Directional (One Skim Building ID Secondary Building ID Area ID Information Desk I 7p,QT Entrance Information Restmom ID Reslmom ID (Tile 24) Room ID Maximum Occupancy ? Wall Directional Exit, Exit Directional Stairwell ID / Emergency F Free-standing Directional ISA Symbol No Smoking Symbol End Panels Ml Emergency Exit Elevator Vestibule Directional Elevator Directory ADA Parking Sign ADA Parking Icon SITE PLAN N Scale - 1" = 30' -0- THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT AUio" AFchilecluie end Urban O—a 5998 'ea Si_ Iie11310.5545128 (FMI ]16559 B]IO CONSULTING ENGINEERS �JonnsmF.v'.701S ARCHITECTS I ENGINEERS STAMP CITU APPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN - PHASE PHASE 1 �� AS Ndetl >n Ne.wNw l0.>bw ouxxer. JF wrrxoer. – mel. Iso) A1.06 IM Building ID (Site) Site Directional Site Directional (One Sided) Building ID Secondary Building ID Area ID Information Desk Entrance Information Restroom ID Restroom ID (Title 24) Room ID Maximum Occupancy Wall Directional dill Exit, Exit Directional Stairwell ID / Emergency Exit 1 :n Free-standing Directional ' ISA Symbol No Smoking Symbol End Panels nnk Emergency Exit Elevator NMI Vestibule Directional R Am Elevator Directory ADA Parking Sign ADA Parking Icon PROJECT NEW DONALD DUNGAN LIBRARY, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CENTER, AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT ARCHITECT RU 18 N Archil BJ UFbee Ueargn 5B kxalaerstre�Ow,MFtw Iran seosse srna iF:.la�o-ssa � CONSULTING ENGINEERS lJohrecn Fararo 2015 o^a�y�• ARCHnEGTS IE GNEEHS STAMP CoY APP110VA1S DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ,.%Oo o Al W1R ras�rn{V+mrxu LIBRARY FIRST FLOOR SIGN LOCATION PLAN v-ua AS N.w -v May 31, 21118 awar. 1503 S G 1.07 BIM LIBRARY SECONMRMfUCAND FLOOR PLAN Scale - 1/8" = PSD'21e - 1/8" = 1'-0" - w�s THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHrfECT f�U 18 N Architecture ena UrhaA 0e1ign rr.nsla� ss6�'I�.as�osseazss CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARCHITECT'S I ENGINEERS STAMP Cm APPROVALS LIONS PARK PROJECTS LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR SIGN LOCATION PLAN s� Aa Nobtl �fr Nwem0er 10, 2(116 aura. JF o•aa®.' + +`vr 1hN w SG 1.08 BIM Building ID (Site) Site Directional ` lT_ 7 Site Directional (One Sided) ° Mw Building ID Secondary Building ID Area ID •,� Information Desk Entrance Information Restroom ID Restroom ID (Tile 24) Room ID Maximum Occupancy • Wall Directional Exit, Exit Directional 4�" Stairwell ID / Emergency Exit �i Free-standing Directional ISA Symbol No Smoking Symbol End Panels .'I. Emergency Exit Elevator 110 Vestibule Directional Elevator Directory ADA Parking Sign ADA Parking Icon THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHrfECT f�U 18 N Architecture ena UrhaA 0e1ign rr.nsla� ss6�'I�.as�osseazss CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARCHITECT'S I ENGINEERS STAMP Cm APPROVALS LIONS PARK PROJECTS LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR SIGN LOCATION PLAN s� Aa Nobtl �fr Nwem0er 10, 2(116 aura. JF o•aa®.' + +`vr 1hN w SG 1.08 BIM F-- SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE - COSTA MESA LIBRARY, LIBRARY Sign I Identification 1Nomencleture (Messaging) Note. SNOT ,L06 Building ID (Site) IMCR SN02AAreaff) 12.07 te Directional :Staff Office SN02Ate .2.08 Directional (One Sided) unity Library Manager BNO1uilding 2.09 1D 'Teen Room BN02econdary 1 Ol Building ID SN03 1-0: Maximum Occupancy BN04formation 1.01 Desk EN05ntrance 1.02 Information 131406estroom 1.03 ID BN07IR 104 M stroom ID (Title 24) IBNOBom IBN09aximum 1.05 ID Occupancy IBN10all 1.06 Directional IBNllit, 2.01 Exit Directional IBN12airwe111D, 2.02 Emergency Exit IBN13ee-Standing 203 Directional IBN14A 1.01 Symbol ONES BN16nd i,01 Smyldeg 5pmbol Panels BN18mergency 7.02 Exit Elevator BN19estibule lAt Directional BN20levator 1.01 Directory BN2PA 1.92 Parking Sign BN22DA 1-01 Parking Icon Signentification 1.97 No S-,Aato svindiAl NtsmsrtclNure (7Aq.aging) Notes BNO1 i -OI uilding 1D iDonald Dungan Library BN02 1.02 uilding 1D iDonald Dungan Library BN02 1.03 econdary Building 1D MUltiouroose BN02 econdary Building ID Meeting Space BN03 j 1.01 ]Area ID Friend's Bookstore BN03 L 02 Area ID Restrooms/Multipurpose Room BN03 L 03 Area 1D Children's Library BN03 L 04 Area 1D Children's Library BN03 2.01 Area ID Teen Room BNfie BN04 1.01 1.02 information Desk Information Desk P-aln.BN16 ntl Psndis 2.O1 Imocm,11tin Desk BN16 -'W Entrance Information EB Porwtf Entrance Information 11HUS j J2-011kestroom Restroom ID Restroom ID Men + ISA Symbol Women + ISA Symbol o P.. -A, Restroom ID IMen + Women + Baby and ISA Symbols Pans UP ID Men + ISA Symbol End Panels Restroom ID (Rest- Men + Woman Icon BN06 2.03 M Restroom 1D Women + ISA Symbol BN07 LOl Restroom ID (Title 24) IMen + ISA Symbol BN07 1_02 ID (Title 24) 'Women + 15A Symbol BN07 1-03 ID (Title 24) IMen + Women + Baby and ISA Symbols BN07 2.01 ID (Title 24) IMen + ISA Symbol BN07 2.02 KRestr- ID (Title 24) iRestoom Men + Woman Icon BN07 2.03 ID (Title 24) Women + ISA Symbol SNOB SNOB 1.01 1.02 Meeting Space 10 Friends Worl.. BNOB 1-03 Room ID Electrical Room SNOB BNO13 L04 1,05 Room ID Room 1D Meeting Room Storage 19 Circulation Workroom SNOB 1.06 Room 1D Meeting Room Storage 17 SNOB 1.07 Room ID Meeting Room Storage 17 KNOB 1108 Room ID AV/IT Closet L6 SNOB 1.09 Room ID AV/IT Closet 6 13NOB 1,10 Roam ID AV/1T Closet 7 13NOB 1,11 Room 1D janitor LS IBNOB 1,12 M Room 1D Staff Workroom E-126 1BNOB 1.13 Room ID Children's Library 131408 2.01 I .2 Study Room B SNOB 2.02 !Study Room C IBNOB IBNOB 2-03 2.04 FlD 15taff Office la nitrRoomIBNOB End Panels2.313 2.05 :Staff Room/Kitchen )91 n I j1dentifi-ficin Nomendature (Messaging) Note. SNOB ,L06 Room 1D IMCR IBNOB 12.07 Room lD :Staff Office IBNOB .2.08 Room 10 unity Library Manager SNOB 2.09 Room ID 'Teen Room IBN09 1 Ol Maximum Occupancy EN0S 1-0: Maximum Occupancy .BN10 1.01 E=It, Exit Dueetionel BN30 1.02 Exit, Exit Directional BN10 1.03 Exit, Exit Directional BN10 104 M Exit, Exit Directional BN10 1.05 Exit, Exit Diredianal BN10 1.06 Exit, Exit Directional BN10 2.01 Exit, Exit Directional BN10 2.02 Exit, Exit Directional BN10 203 Exit, Exit Dlrectis," BN12 1.01 5;i%"l 10. k11w .ntv Exit BHSI i,01 srmrwdl iD, Emer E=lr BN 12 7.02 5MrNMl ID. Ema 0MV Exit Bffll lAt F-Ftwkilling Datc»onal 13N14 1.01 ISA Symbol 13N14 1.92 35A 5ymbel 13N15 1-01 NO SmX;ho Symbol SINES 1.97 No S-,Aato svindiAl M16 i -OI End Pooh BN16 1.02 End Panels ON16 1.03 MEN PetM. Ortib d P,u alsfW16 nd PanelsON16 0 PanelsUNI?Id P.-NBN 16 VEndPanels nd PanelsBNl6 ms P.MtsSN16 Panets16 nd Panelsd P-aln.BN16 ntl Psndis BN16 -'W EB Porwtf 11HUS Panels 1111W o P.. -A, DNt6 Pans UP DNt6 End Panels ON 16 Ppnpl. d Panebt UNL6 ONlo -1k d Panels GN16 2.09 MEN Pa0ek Panels BN 16 2.10 IIIIIIIIII&A ON16 2.11 End Panels BN16 7112 no PaMR YM p."Ll 131,116 7.13 BNi6 2.14 End Panels BN16 2.15 End Pahl" BN16 2.16 End PnnN5 lNid 2.17 End Panels 13N 16 'Lill End PANdis LIN 16 2.i9 9114 P. -h SNi6 7-20 End Panels IBN16 222 End I , Lind 04"s BN 16 7.22 11I ;L23 End Panels BN 16 234 End limpOs End Pontis IBN16 2.25 IN 18 7.26 Eno Porins Wf)h 2.77 End Pdhlls End Panels BU16 2.26 0ff16 I .2 End PsnPls :.)0 EM PAN432.31 End Panels 2.72 End Panels2.313 End Pmw1s p i.34 End P-ij 101 Emergency CE3rraoar 201 E+n n Ex1t MwviWr 2.01 Wall G r BN20 1,01 Elevator Directory Teen Library, Adult Collections, and Administration BN20 2A! El-lb,1O.K1bry 91_ 7C THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t%u� 18 N Arehil nd Urban Design treeal-572a iFa,j iiasssazm CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5idal�nFavam21'5' ArloxNcrat D101NLSB].rAAlr CRY APPROVALS %9'e CD SUBMFITAL Mone tomb DD SUBMFTAL a8"wi; v -SD SUBMITTAL 00119115 III Issue Dale ISSUE I REVISIONS LIONS PARK PROJECTS SIGN SCHEDULE LIBRARY A. Noted - NayO+Lrr 10.1016 SG1.11 BIM NOTES • Panel -114'x 40'x 14' • Material• 3/4' Steel Plate • Graphics- Die -Cut Vinyl • Finish - Background painted • 100% afto,k of all sign graphics will he supplied to fabncator correct placement in sign p" • Sign + Foundation Slirw%w r Engineered • faYt'dlhan°niWill" V 41xM1V¢O+e11 DUNGAN pONA�p L)BKAKY W009 LD�HstN TY CE�TEa SNO1 - Site ID Canon type or 90- Angle - mm mum radii, SNOT - Top View Scale -3/4' = V -0' SN01 • Front View Sal - Fronl Mew Scale -3/4'=l'-0' Scale -3/4'=l'-0' NOTES ? J ,5 • Panel- 21'x4B'x 1/4'Th. • ill -LW SW AWl 30'Angle-minimum radius hand • Graphics- DieCarVinyl • Finish Painted Sraie fi' - • Sign + Fountlalion Structurally Engineered SNOT -Tap Mew • Fountlalion mounting plate below grade Scale - I ll2' = 1' - 0' 21'� �21 10 I I Neighhorhoed Ne Community Center Ca Community Center nn^ma°a Donald Dungan Donald Dungan c^mmuaur°^1Q` Library L ihra ry Fion°loo^^r°^ U^rary ]� Cafe Mesa F\_ Cale Mesa 4e Ca14 M°°a SNOT - Front Mew 1 Scale -1 l/2'=1'-0' 13 SNOT - Fronl Mew 2 Scale 11/2'=1'-0' SN02 - Site Directional FO W a71 -S1n re.rrs ani vMe =+n vgr Srae I12'=I-Q SNO1 - Site ID SN02 • Top View of new Plale Scale -3'=1' 0' SN02 - Site Directional 6 L� 4 375' I I� SN02 - Section View of Base Plate/Foundation Scale -3'=1'-0' PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT �Ivgio N dee Alr�ne�e• •n! al r0�n O�i19n p.it �,o-ssgaa°'IF�,I a,asse azp CONSULTING ENGINEERS HJahmm� Feram 2015 �� �� MCM;G ry! iN[iHCEA 3+1� ri;.WRTYJMI YJ°b GD SUDMITTAL 11IIW10 100%DD SUBMBTAL 0a11511e 1o0%SD SUBMDTAL 04119118 rva Issue Dele ISSUE / flEVI310N5 LIONS PARK PROJECTS awn. 1503 SG1.12 BIM ? J ,5 Ntll•LF•Yi. Sraie fi' =1 -0' W a71 -S1n re.rrs ani vMe =+n vgr Srae I12'=I-Q SNO1 - Site ID SN02 • Top View of new Plale Scale -3'=1' 0' SN02 - Site Directional 6 L� 4 375' I I� SN02 - Section View of Base Plate/Foundation Scale -3'=1'-0' PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT �Ivgio N dee Alr�ne�e• •n! al r0�n O�i19n p.it �,o-ssgaa°'IF�,I a,asse azp CONSULTING ENGINEERS HJahmm� Feram 2015 �� �� MCM;G ry! iN[iHCEA 3+1� ri;.WRTYJMI YJ°b GD SUDMITTAL 11IIW10 100%DD SUBMBTAL 0a11511e 1o0%SD SUBMDTAL 04119118 rva Issue Dele ISSUE / flEVI310N5 LIONS PARK PROJECTS awn. 1503 SG1.12 BIM NOTES . VnIe1 - 71' it Al{' :.717 • Material -3/4' Aluminum Plate • Graphics - Die -Cut VNnyl • Finish - Painted • Sign+ Foundation Structurally Engineered • Foundation mounling plate below grade • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabncalor m correct placement in ,gn panel hosts rMa� SN02A - Site Directional (One Sided) I� 75 SN01 - Top View Scale -11/2'=1'-0' IO �zl� LIONS Capri Courtyard 13 42' I I SNOT - Frani View I Scale - 1 112' - 1'• 0' SNOT - Frani View 2 Scale -112'=1'-0' NOTES • Panel-21'x48'x.75' motel • w Atpmvnn Vaa• • Graphics - Die -Out Vul l • Rnish-Painted • Sign+ Foundation Structurally Engineered • Foundation mounting plate below grade 8' �^ 21.75' 2' SN02.11111W "IJv Scale -3'=l'-0' SN02A - Site Directional (One Sided) Baseplate SNp2. Sect- Vipy/ of Base PIaIplFnundafinn Bolt uo Scale -3'-P-0' NOTES • Letters - 27• x 2' Depth 3 Tap • Ma[eraI - Aluminum fabricated letters • Finish - Painted to match facade --seams • Lighting- None • 100% artwork of all sign =t.11 be supplied to too ralor _---••^-"- "� � •"'- _ placement in sign panel LIBRARY BN01 - Front View -Sign Scale- 1/2' =1' - O' BNO1 - Building ID (North) 93_ PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT ilupis N Archifeclure and Urban Design M;°c`M,cas�aimpno, r<•n a,ocss9eno Irl oinss�azzo CONSULTING ENGINEERS 9 Johnson Zwea 2015 �ri�s ARCHITECT'S I ENGINEERS STAMP C0•r ArvA0VAL0 SO°i, cD 9U11i IL Iufp,O lay%0031�pMALpnyfb Ilfti••fm 5alaerfnAL outnrt. tswa om. rswErn LSIONS LIONS PARK PROJECTS was AS Naled �m November 10, 2016 maxri 1503 SG1.13 BIM NOTES • Letters -Die culvmyl, mane white • Cap height 3,375' • Attachment - Mounted to second surface • 100% a"ork of all sign graphics will he supplied to labncalor in correct placement in sign panel 0'RD �', Library -Victoria Room Scale - 1 1)2'= P - 0' i• J• _ BN02/1 02 Library - Multipurpose Room Entry Scale - 1/4' = 1' 0' BN02 - Secondary Building ID IAbral T, M. itGOdl 9cW • I,ux- r. I I }f I ysl • 1 [ 13WVI AI IJI)fM MRTLdW acorn Li 'in Scale - 114-1'-0* 42" 1 1 •�► 14.85" BN03 - Children's Area, ID Sign and Vision Graphics Scale - 1 1/2" = 1' - 0" I I 2" 7- BN03 - Children's Area, ID Sign and Vision Graphics Scale - 1 1/2" = 1' - 0" BN03 - Childrens Library 36" 42' Centered � r IR`�0E��ff� l"'A+��R�TL�9P��6R1 •6�� tD — 45.5' Glass width 466 NOTES • Matenal-3M OnCut Vinyl • All colors match calor palette • Attachment - Mount On fat surface • Lim punts screens on 3M Frosted Crystal • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to labncaha In caned placement in sign panel 4 :: 4 Note: Center lion prints in each window area THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT N Architecture an0 Urban Design 1>'al alaosseno IFavl �asssezza CONSULTING ENGINEERS FJahnwn Fevam 21's W CH rtrOT l r pl (W i E mi .YYb+ CDV APPROVALS I 10MDD SaBMnT flit buil atbL4 i RLwOIA%3 BN03 - Children's Area, ID Sign and Vision Graphics Scale -1 1/2' = 1' - 0- LIONS PARK PROJECTS BN03 - Childrens Library ��No�a a,wa„ 150:1 14_ 11 SG1.15 atM PROJECT 4'1 E :D 7 5' cap Wper artwork) -i BN03 - F'o'L (FRIENDS) - Front View BN03 - F'o'L Letters - Side View THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS Scale -3'=1'-0' Scale -3'=1'-0' Varies per letter ARCHITECT 1 1 i� ar�n neo eea uree� oee;an 1 I sew . _ .. _#_ _ _ . nai9,assasrm ire.i3,9ss9ezz9 1116' th. adhesive -back flexible magnet sheet attached to shelf per layout McMaster -Carr part k5769K91 or equivilent BN03 - F'o'L (FRIENDS) - Plan View Scale -3'=1'-0' BN03 - F'oT (OF) - Front View Scale - 3' = 1' - 0' BNO3 - F'o'L (OF THE) - Plan View Scale - 3' = 1' - 0' B NO3 - F'o'L (THE) - Front View Scale -3'=1'-0' BN03 - F'o'L Letters - Side View Scale - 3' = 1'- 0' Letter "S" can with open back. Letter be aluminum or stet bottom plate mu: 16 ga, 16 ga, steel flat plate same shape as me added to bottom of "0" and attach to magnet sheet. Magnet s has adhesive back and attached to D ]DDA D 7D BN03 - F'o'L (LIBRARY) - Front View BN03 - F'o'L Letters - Side View Scale -3'=1'-0' ■�■ rn �rr� BN03 - F'o'L (LIBRARY) - Plan View Scale -3'=1'-0' BN03 - Friends of the Library Scale -3'=1'-0' -95- BN03 - F'o'L Letters - Side View ("S") Scale - Full Scale CONSULTING ENGINEERS 'b Johnson Fevem 2015 �� •11fJYtlii3, eK1�liFF3 STAMv Crnr APPROVALS 1 100%00 SUBMfrTAL 09115/191 LIONS PARK PROJECTS As Nolen • 1 nm.nnrar 10. n116 SG1.17 a' (?) ASK ME A QUESTION Note: Center sign on curve of desk BN04 - Information Desk Sign Scale - 1 1/2' = 1' - 0' BN04 - Information Desk NOTES • Inset Leiters in custom desk • Matonal - compos le wood construction . 6np? [s- Lemon and, coo, M."d m fea Y • IODR ytAprk 40 y81 i l'•ts will be supplied to fabricator In WMWI plaOampK n 1W panel — Face of Desk —. 18W Inset 6' 2' 20' *A� I BN04-Sign Letter BN04-Section View Full Scale Full Scale NOTES • Letters - Die cut vinyl, black • city +County Seal artwoM will be part of all artwork • Attachment - Mounted to second surface • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator in correct placement In sign panel Letters- Die cul vinyl, black BNO5 E*— Information, Ekv-malMew Sale -34'=1'-D' BN05 - Library Information _ 9(V. ,as PARK AVE COSTAH6AGTla2] HOUlei MONDAY IOAa AH1-roam IOHDAT I___roam WEDta3DAT l000 Aid -r m TMIRSDAY Imm-roam FNDAY 4W AM-SWm sATGRDAT 9W AM -SW m suvoW 4.00 AM-S.Wm tlD5E0 HOLa)AYs (aw)aKbalS M1 PwaaPlwlnbbticmdd re.. a'A sFAwcE ANIHus F�eAnrr® /� I[}� Imnarlwaram..nsepar•rtlr mOpP,dag< BNB51rforrabon Sale -3'=1'-O' rl THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT Rugio, Archirec rare end Urhen Design Waa M. rc Repo assss2o I11.1an ssaazm CONSULTING ENGINEERS 9JoM1mm� Fa em 2a15� ��� ARCHITECTS I ENGINEE" STAMP CRT APPROVALS 100°/DD 9r.0AflfTAl pngla frA•. eD SImw1YA. OAnYnn kww Oafn asslr_ r IRnwR LIONS PARK PROJECTS Aa Noted moi Raareparfp yyra 1503 SG1.18 BIM NOTES . 7 pw%vs 01 1$' Ilye.k-W A • Malenal-Call Acrylic • Graphics•1/32'raised GnvoTac ar equivalent type with 1/16' balls for Braille, press f2+screen printed icons • Al lachment- 3M transfer adhesive+ silicone adhesive UM Ill" M PNO! iMp N'ilA iiipa(farpnt • 100%artwork al all sign graphics will be supplied to labncator in correcl pfacemenl in sign panel BN05 - Elevation p n 0 MEN WOMEN RESTROOM V no, 1D II Am 8 875 9' V� MEN ON06 - Fror l View BNO6 - Side View Scale - 1/2"= P-0' Scale - 6'=I' -O' BN06 - Restroom ID Scale - 6'= l'- 0" NOTES • Panel - 2 panels at 1/8' thickness • Material - Casl Acryhc • Graphics1/32'ra¢ed G,ay.T3coraquIv.1.nitype.Ih U16' balls for Braille, press lit • AR chmenl- 3M transfer adhesive+ silicone adhesive used between panels and wall attachment • Far glass condition, apply limit coated clear vinyl of the same type color on the first...face prior to sign application. 11' 031' • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator incorrect placement in sign panel 10.9 0 125' � x6 STAFF WORKROOM 7 25' 7 75" AIL Context Elevation Elevation Scale - 1/2' = 1'-0' Scale - 6' = 1'-0" BN08 - Room ID Side View Scale -6'=1'-0" NOTES • Panel - 12'Q or 12'per side x 1/9' thickness • Material - Cast Acrylic • Graphics- Screen printed graphics • Attachment-3Mlmnsleradheswe+slliconeadhesive • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to labriralor C in Ran 0.50' O n�� BNO7 - Elevabun View BN07 - Front View BNO7 - Front Ih— Scale - 1/2' =1' 0' Scale - 6' =1'-0' Scale - 6' = 11•0' BN07 - Restroom ID (Title 24) NOTES • 2 Panels of 1/8' thickness • Malenal - Cast Acrylic • Graphics-1/32'raised GrawTac.r equivalent type with 1/16' balls for Braille press IR+Screen printed icons • Alll nri,ot- 3M handeradhesive+ alirixie adhesive used belwon panels and wall a0-rder l • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator in rune[[ plareal in sign panel 1 60'to center of ign BNO9 - Elevation View Scale -12'=F-0' BN09 - Maximum Occupancy 99 3NO9 - Front View 12' Di PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT RU 18 N CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS STAMP CITY APPROVALS BNO9 - Side wew Scale -6'=F- 0' If PIAN CHECK SUBMfTfAL .2,1.2 Mrs CG SIrw-AL 11110/18 10051%! SiDliffal dailead 100% SO Su..— No Issue Dale ISSUE / REVISIONS .•a LIONS PARK PROJECTS Aa Noted — Novemher10.20i8 air• 1= SG1.19 BIM NOTES • �Pan4lk of I.E'1•. •'._... • al -Cast Acrylic 10'� • Graphics- - 1/32' raised GrvoTac aor equivalent type yalh 116, balls for Braille, press fd+screen printed icons 950' Attachment ttac • Attachment -3M transfer adheswe+silicone adhesive used between panels and wall ahachment • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator in correct placement in sign panel BN 10 - Elevalion View Scale - 1/2" = 1' - 0' BN 10 -Wall Directional NOTES • 1 Panel of 1/4' thickness • Material - Cast Acrylic • Graph i - 1/32' onsed GravoTac or equivalent type with 1/16' balls for Braille, press lit screen printed icons adrilli used belovaim panels and wall attachment • 100°k artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator in correct placement in sign panel BN12 - Elevalion View Scale - 1/2' = U 0' BN12 - Stairwell ID T Staff Restrooms Adams Room BN10 - Front View 14 Oor 1800• I THROUGH MEZZANINE NO ROOF ACCESS EXIT DOWN TO LEVEL I fII� 031' V 126- I 'A" 26 l_ Scale -6' = 1' -0' 31,112 - Front View BN12 - Side Mew Scale - 3' = U-0' Scale - 3' = 1'-G• NOTES • 10iii iM"1Mck,wss • Material - Cast Acrylic • Graphics -1/32'raised G..Tac or equivalent type vnth 1/16' balls for Graire, press td+screen ionated icons • Attachment3Mlrensferadheswe+shconeadhesive ,%*d I10earta pangs OW Aid 4eXi • 100% artwork of all sign graphs well be supplied In fabricator in correct placement In sign panel EXIT STAIR DOWN 65- EXIT ROUTE H. 6 5' -y i r 0 25' EXIT 3 IB 6 N I I - Elevairm View BIT. 1 - Side View 3/4 Size 3/4 Size BN11 - Exit, Exit Directional NOTES • Panel 'x 42'x 114' Th • vatnr4 f i4mnron— Puee • Graphics Die-OIIMnyI • Finrsh-Pointetl • 100°k artwork of all sign grapi will be supplied to fabricetOr in correct placement In sign panel .T. Adam, Roam children s Om gruidams � re„„ Einar• Nwt [e1•=dans Study Roams "'aria Roam BN13 - Free-standing Directional BN13 - Back View Scale- 1 1/2' = E- 0' 3" Th Bowm 30 Angle i" mm bend fen 1Nln N1 SNOT -Top View Scale - 1 12• = 1'- 0' 20 Scale - t 12' = V - 0' PROJECT Vii.. THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT �%Vgi 8 N AFchrl —1— Fe and Urban pesign CuM�Cry, aAn, Poo (Fe113165545120 IFer131— a220 CONSULTING ENGINEERS B Johnson Favem 2015 �P A,wvfmrcrs r vfamrLrrts RrwR CITVAPPROVALS 1oo•/.DD SUBMITTAL oafioao LIONS PARK PROJECTS coxa AS NOIatl b*E November 10, 2016 a�mar. 1583 SG 1.20 BIM Adams Room Children's Ren Restrooms r\ Teen's Escape Adult Collections Study Rooms 42 —� Victoria Room BN13 - Front Miew Scale - t 12' = V - 0' PROJECT Vii.. THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT �%Vgi 8 N AFchrl —1— Fe and Urban pesign CuM�Cry, aAn, Poo (Fe113165545120 IFer131— a220 CONSULTING ENGINEERS B Johnson Favem 2015 �P A,wvfmrcrs r vfamrLrrts RrwR CITVAPPROVALS 1oo•/.DD SUBMITTAL oafioao LIONS PARK PROJECTS coxa AS NOIatl b*E November 10, 2016 a�mar. 1583 SG 1.20 BIM BN 14- Front View NOTES • Panel 7, x 6' x 3 Mil thickness • AI6KM[O'R lW NMh rl6WM 6] • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabncalor in correct placement in sign panel 6.00 BN 14 - Front View Full Scale Full Scale BN14 - ISA Symbol NOTES 1t • Panel - 14' x 1150' x 1/4' thickness • Malenal - h, aluminum +various thicknesses of cos[ acrylic sheet - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' e • Graphics - sscreen printed graphics nr • Changeable graphics panted es card mane wade sive cardstock • Attachment - 3M transfer adhesive +sibcone adhesive NONFICTION • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator [0 in correct placement in sign panel �y 4' L (Changeable Insert - lop + Botlom) - - - _ - - - - - - - _ - - - _ - - - - - - - - 14' l Philosphy Religion 11811, Acrylic 4' & Religion 310A6 to 399.9 030' 000 to 3 10.4 5 Aluminum Sheet 1 x 1/4Y4 S�' £[INIr'1IAgMeY On 2.0 J/IlOe t") Spacerpecer BN 16 - Elevalion View BN 16 - Front View BN 16 - Front View Front Eleveliar View; Scale: 314"=1'-0" Scale: 5' = P- 0' Scale: 6' = 1'-0' BN 16 - End Panel BN15 - Front View Full Scale BN15 - No Smoking Symbol NOTES Px 10' r 6.15',. IM, twonlas • Material -Cast Acrvhc • Graphics - 1/32' raised GcmaTac or equivalent type vath 1/16' balls far Braile, presslit +screen panted graphics • Attachment- 3M transfer adhesive+ sdicane adhesive • [00% artwork of all sign graphics mil be supplied In labricator in correct placemen[ in sign pond BN18 - Elevation View Scale - 1/2'= l' -O' B N 18 - Emergency Exit, Elevator - qq- NOTES • Panel • 6' x 6' x 3 Wthickness • Ahachment- Vinyl with adhesim back • 100 %artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator In correct placement m sign panel BN 15 - Front View Full Scale S IN CASE OF FIRE DO NOT USE ELEVATOR. USI~ EXIT STAIRS BN 18 - Front View BN18 - Side View Scale -6'=1'-0" Scale -6'=1'-0' PROJECT _s THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT Aukis, Archllecfure ane urban Oesign seas c•��ev.v�eozsm r CONSULTING ENGINEERS AJohnran Favem 2015 -•As ARGY16T3 / ENNNCIR9 `aiA W -APPROVALS HIM DB SUB -AL 0911Y1e 10MSD SUBMIRAL 0411.1. No Issue Dale ISSUE I REVISIONS LIONS PARK PROJECTS maz MNoted >•+r N--rlo,2016 eaerr If61 SG1.21 BIM BN10A - Elevation, Restroon Vestibule Scale - 12' = U - 0' rry� • Material - Extenar Paving paint 25'— 5'ADAMS • rmphl - PRinhH Graphic E-ADAMSROOM NOTES i• r� • Letters - Weler-jet or laser cut 3/8" Ih. x 6" So, steel • Material - Aluminum - palpled . Xa"untpd wV Lllirl•a adhtl L R E S T RO O M Ste. 2' sq steel tube j • 100% artwork BI all sign graphics well be panelled to labrlcalOr In correct placemen) In sign panel BN10A - Wall Directional BN10A - Side View Scale - 112' = V - 0' Scale -11/2 =1 -0 BN19 - Vestibule Directional NOTES • Panel -1H'x 12'x l/H'thickness • 111"hiil'AIYRdrum.51MR • rraphlcs - RM Die -Cut Vinyl • Allachment - Mechanically Fastened 12° BN21 - ADA Parking Scale - 3' = 1'-0' NOTES • 2 Panels of 1B' Thickness • Material - Cast Acrylic • Graphics -1/32' raised Grami or equiraknt type with 1/16' balls lar Blade, press of +screen pointed icons • Attachment- 3M transfer adteswe+ silicone adhesive used between panels and wall attachment • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator In correct placement in sign panel BN20- Elrwation View Scale - 12' =1'-0' BN20 - Elevator Directory NOTES • Sign Panel -36'x36' rry� • Material - Extenar Paving paint eo oo• • rmphl - PRinhH Graphic i• r� 3/8" Ih. x 6" So, steel 2' sq steel tube j base plate s. 0 0 Contex) Elevation Vehicular Pale Signs - Pole lop view Scale - 3/4' = 1'-0' Scale - 6' = V-0• BN21 - ADA Parking Scale - 3' = 1'-0' NOTES • 2 Panels of 1B' Thickness • Material - Cast Acrylic • Graphics -1/32' raised Grami or equiraknt type with 1/16' balls lar Blade, press of +screen pointed icons • Attachment- 3M transfer adteswe+ silicone adhesive used between panels and wall attachment • 100% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator In correct placement in sign panel BN20- Elrwation View Scale - 12' =1'-0' BN20 - Elevator Directory NOTES • Sign Panel -36'x36' • Material - Extenar Paving paint • rmphl - PRinhH Graphic BN22 -Context Plan BN22 - ADA Parking Icon 90 -111111111, — 7' 4 0 31' 650 A17 LEVEL Circulation Desk Information 'B Fiction 9875' 100D' LEVEL 2 Non-fiction Periodicals BN20 - Front View BN20 - Side View Scale - 3/4 Size Scale - 374 Size BN22 -Painted ISA Symbol Scale - 1' = P-0" PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t�u�is N Archirecrure and Urban Oesign seas wazxxwair a—. oroum Fbor Mr"CAB2a2 (Tdl at4ss352'ea IFazl9atass3e2e0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS ® JOhnun Favem 2015 ARNVITOln/QAT URA lhrr —APPROVALS —CHECK SUBMITTAL 11 1BlIB .1 CD SUBMil 11/trots 100%00 SUBMITTAL Oa/15116 IOMSD SUBMITTAL rumelle NB Issue Dale ISSUE / REVISIONS LIONS PARK PROJECTS KwE AS NB1ed n Nm..err IA A1K #air. ,aoa SG 1.22 BIM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THE OFFICE OF JAMES BURNETT LIGHTING DESIGN DARKHORSE LIGHTWORKS CIVIL ENGINEER KPFF GRAPHICS / SIGNAGE Ph.D M.E.P. ENGINEER INTEGRAL GROUP LIBRARY CONSULTANT LINDA DEMMERS COSTA MESA, CALIk0RNIA PHASE 2 SECURITY SECURE CONSULTING AND DESIGN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NABIH YOUSSEF —81-- INTERIORS RODRIGO VARGAS DESIGN ACOUSTICS / AV -IT WAVEGU/DE KITCHEN CONSULTANT KITCHEN PROFESSIONALS INC. COST ESTIMATOR MGAC ARCHITECT luli 8 " ssea e1A�cwo oen srnEET CLLVERW.CA� 9ft) 310.59 SRO )FAX) 310.59 0720 I ii ,L I I_� '� 1�.I � - y c `�is ��. �r.1 •.Ir .rj al yl •�a'�I.�T�I•I"` \ ` •I � � f y ff I L f �I!I I I' { f �»�. .. .i�--I ,r��4 � —• +� al�I*'y:� i� � - ��—'��r �It- �.�.� ' � � �, ,�,/ -'� j ''-� I� � _ � . • � SII '—�;; 1 I ' � �.� I ~ � � l: .I r.� it i. ^. • ... • .I � � I � -' �IYI � � �'� 1 - _l - ,, � ��A�•3~-`.I tPIAT wuax - s � - -- Y' s 1 � ��'— may. • • • , w��� . �." -� I I ' ; � n _ .. I y �� CEJ � ' `�• �' \ ', I I � ' ♦ .� � ! i.. ! l: .:a,.� : �,.� � 1� R�.,�� M�r,�.;.. � :,:v� II } A_ `— COMMUNITY CENTER '����!"���.4.�.� j.la "!•I"1-' - l . \ i L1.02.0i-CONSTRUCTION PLAN L4 • S4ILS PLAN . l a ►I a .l a � .i . l . � a s } ? 1.5.02.01 IRRIGATION PLAN I _ i - L9.tl2A1 - PLANTING PLAN •�ti1 _ y� - _.1 I • - 19.02,01 -SITE FURNISHING PLAN ` - • a I -70— -SI,--3a--Scl- 83_ LO.02.00 ORIENTATION PLAN LID. 02.01 TREE PROTECTION PLAN L1.02.00 CONSTRUCTION PLANS I L1.02.01 CONSTRUCTION PLANS L2.02.01 SITE SECTIONS 1-3.02.01 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L3.02.02 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L4.02.01 SOILS PLAN L6.02.00 PLANTING PLANS L6.02.01 PLANTING PLANS L7.02.00 PLANTING DETAILS 1_8.02.01 SITE FURNISHING PLANS E e PLANTING NOTES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BY THE CONTRACTOR 1. MAKISNAHCE PERM SNALL BEGIN ON FNETRST pAY AFIIOi AL! LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION WORK ON 11E PR6IECI IS COMPLETE, CHECKED, ACCEPTED AND WRITTEN APPROVAL FRCM IHC OWNER ANO LANOSQftn ARCHITECT LS GIVER TO BEGIN THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD. MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL CONTINUE THEREAFTER FOR NO LESS THAN 365 CONTINUOUS CALENDAR DAYS 2. CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL INVOLVED AREAS DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE LANDSCAPING OPERATIONS AND DURING THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD UNTIL THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. 3 REGULAR PEANTINC MAWTENANCE OPERAF IO:iS SHALL BEGIN IWWIE IAMLY AFTER EACH PLANT IS PLAIMO- PLANTS6HALL BE KEPT UI A]RFALTI'A, GAOY11N0 CONpITK1NA71p INA VLWALLV PLEASING AFNTFMA4CEBY WATERING, PRUNING, TRIMMIINO, FDOW6, FENTILTONO RE$TAIfIMO. MF AND D13FASE CCNTROlUNO, SPRAYIA1p RVEEOINR CLEAMIHH•UP AND OTHER OPERATIONS OF MAINTENANCE. LA40SCAPE A,REAG ERALL BE KEPT FREE GFWEEpS, NOXIOL75 GRA55, AND OTHEA UNDESQLEO VEGETATIVE DRIT`VTH AN DEBRIS. PLANTS FOUND TO BE DEAD OR IN AN IMPAIRED CONDITION SHALL BE REPLACED IMMEDIATELY. 4. IRRWlION SYSTEM SHALL REQUIRE CONT"O11S MM NTENANCE, CLEANING, ADJUSTMENT, PART REPLACEMENT AND INSPECTION. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROWOE THESE SERVICES ON A CONTINUAL AND REGULAR BASIS DURING THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD TO INSURE THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM M PROPERLY OPERATED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. 5. COMPLETION DATE DF THE CONTRACT MAINTENANCE PERIOD WILL BE LYTENDED, WHEN IN THE OPINION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITEIl, IMPROPER MAINFEIMAIU CR THE UNHEALTHY CONDITION OF PLANTED MATERIAL IS EVIDENT ATTHE TERMINATION OF THE SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE FERRIED CONTRACTOR SHALLASSUINERESPOHSANRY FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE UNTIL LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTABLE 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF LANDSCAPE AREAS. REPAIR DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY GUARANTEES & REPLACEMENTS BY THE CONTRACTOR 1. GUARANTEE TREES, SHRUBS, GROUNDDMP. AND MRF TO REMAIN HEALTHY AND VMRWSLY GROWING FOR A PERIOD OF FIRST DAY AFTER ALL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION WORKON THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE. CHECKED. AGG"D AND WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE CIN AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DUE YEAR FROM COTAPLEnON DATE OF THE CONTRACT MAINTENANCE PERIOD 2 PLANTS FOUND TO BE DEAD OR NOT IN VIGOROUS CONDITION AS DETERMINED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NOTED WITHIN THE GUARANTEE PERIOD SHALL BE REPLACE WITHIN 14 DAYS OF NOTIFICATION 4 USE PLANTS FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE SAME KIND AND SIZE AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST. FURNISH, PLANT AND FERTILIZE AS ORIGINALLY SPECIFIED. 5 THE ENTIRE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE TIME OF TURNOVER TO THE OWNER FOLLOWING THE CONTRACT MAINTENANCE PERIOD. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP OF THE INSTALLATION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. DECLARATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS BEARING THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, FOR ANY REASON, THE USER ACKNOWLEDGES AND ACCEPTS THE FOLLOWING 1 PLANT MATERIAL IS A DYNAMIC, UNPREDICTABLE, LIVING ORGANISM THAT GAN CREATE HAZARDS TO PEOPLE AND BUILT STRUCTURES PLANT SCHEDULE TMfi com WTWWANA1l14XMMLAI OEDFAA PANNROM/AUBTMLMNWILLOW CErTIA'fA AYNA➢ FORM ClFM1NUNK oPr AEW11d (f'l� ] ITP WWX 10--W OJ�,r�T.wo7afF i 0% µ itpml O.MAIM 4n flo ."l lkNIAMIMOSIFILLI JACAXANDAMULTI-TRUNK 48'BOX ^^� PLANTING PLANS MULTI-TRUNr33C LOWIYWrB Y , O.IMMX Y7MIMWIXfflAI C*AWWAI4TNBM. WVOR IAULTI-TINNM"CANEB LBWBMNCH 1 ^lam O.IM ,LICI"IIAIIIIIIIIOLU/JACARANDAMILTI-THUNK "BOX 180CTI-7NUB8]SCAIEB tUNBNMOI 7 OIMM .MCMRMIAMIMOSIFOUA/JACARANDAMULTI-TRUNK 48' BOX HTANOARO rMIN / OIM APJ4MAr0AMTM00101LA19GWAIXI IWM OTANDMD IP MIM t O.3M53 W.CAIUNWWIMUAVLMMASIcv~ RPBOX 1DANOXNO fN1M i ,t!^'1 IAP SGB11EyRIlu NanINIA/OwBFitGIAE IAA •M'BD% i 0 ,oE 99fALUSOULWLIPMeO 1UWN YAS 4iPBOA WIr 1 liM18ARIOi OMWIWLCUfS WJE 180TANICALKAME/COMMON NAME owun iNAMO IOW L1ry VEL L►AAD84 lMA0MA DEIA m0rouUawUNAM 11ML 8'4' 1RILOTME 7]N 5786>PMBFA PRE ECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECT PHASE 2 ARCHITECT t%u�i 8 N A-hll—iure end f/rben DeelO. BNB. BI.tlMaMa SbeeL (Ywtl Floor CWer Chy, F. MK.2 (ra1)31.6P.fil]. (F.143— LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THE OFFICE OF OJ B I JAMES BURNETT A�reMe ASE McIrTATrp MYA eWerBeu�,r YMIIOYN 2 THIS PROJECT FEATURES PLANTING IN CONTAINERS AND IN SPACES CONFINED ON ALL SIDES BY BUILDING STRUCTURES. PLANTS GROWN IN CONTAINERS OF CONFINED SPACES WILL NOT ACHIEVE SIZES OR CHARACTERISTICS AS THE SAME PLANTS GROWN IN UNRESTRICTED, NATURAL CONDITIONS. ROOTS WILL GROW TO THE EDGES OF CONFINED AREAS AND MUST BE REGULARLY INSPECTED BY PLANT CARE PROFESSIONALS TO INSURE NO DAMAGE TO THE CONTAINER, BUILDING STRUCTURE, OR WATERPROOFING COMPONENTS CITYAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISNJN 3.PLANT MATERIALS USED ON THIS PROJECT HAVE VARYING WATER USE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE DETERMINED FROM SEASON TO SEASON, WEATHER CONDITIONS, TYPE OF PLANT,--•y�^� AND BY LOCATION WATER APPLICATION MUST READJUSTED AS NECESSARY. PLANT MATERIAL, PLANTING SOIL AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS REQUIRE CONTINUOUS, ON-GOING, PROFESSIONAL MONITORING IMPROPER MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING CAN LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE MAINTENANCE �. ...-., OF THE WORK REPRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND THEREFORE DISAVOWS ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGES CAUSE BY PLANE GROWTH ANLON THE APPLICATION OF OJ�,r�T.wo7afF IRRIGATION WATER. 0% µ itpml ARCHITECTS J ENGINEER'S STAMP 4n flo Ift 160 om 4. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HAS HAD NO CONTROL OVER, AND TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT OTHER THAN WHAT IS EXPLICITLY ILLUSTRATED ON ^^� PLANTING PLANS A. Noeea ere HE DRAWINGS SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WORK NOTED AS TY OTHERS' IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. , 5. UNLESS THESE PLANS ARE CLEARLY MARKED 'FOR CONSTRUCTIOWAND BEAR THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THEY MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. PLANTING GENERAL NOTES ^lam 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIMSELF FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY COST INCURRED TO DAMAGE OF SAID UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES IF PROPER VERIFICATION BY CONTRACTOR WAS NOT PERFORMED. 2. DO NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH PLANTING OPERATIONS AS DESIGNED WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT OBSTRUCTIONS AND/OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT WERE NOT KNOWN SHALL THE DESIGN PROCESS SUCH IMMEDIATELY BEBROUGHT TO THE ATTENTIONOF THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DDURINGALL RESPONSIBILITY FORALLNECEBSARCCHANGES ONDITIONS TE ASSUME 3 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COORDINATION WITH SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH HIS PLANTING OPERATIONS 4. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE SPECIFICATIONS, NOTES AND PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION 5 IF CONFLICTS ARISE BETWEEN THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE AREAS ON THE SITE AND THE DRAWINGS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR RESOLUTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO RECEIVE THE ON -!TRADE PORTION OFTHE SITE WITHIN 1OFA FOOT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A LETTER OF GRADE CERTIFICATION FROM THE OWNER PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK 7 AFTER FINISH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR ALL ON -GRADE PLANTING AREAS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TESTED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS TESTING LABORATORY FOR SOIL FERTILITY, AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY, AND SOIL PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS THE CONTRACTOR MAYBE REQUESTED TO AMEND THE SOIL TO CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS.HOWEVER, ANY AMENDMENT THAT MIGHT BE REQUESTED OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY BE UPON RECEIPT OF A WRITTEN CHANGE ORDER FROM THE OWNER B REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANTING REQUIREMENTS, MATERIALS, AND EXECUTION, B. ALL TREES SHALL BE TAGGED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AS PER SPECS 10. FINAL LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OFTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE FOLLOWINGTASKS BEFORE SEGINNING PLANTING OPERATIONS. BOLLARDS- STAKE ALL BOLLARD AND TREE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BOLLARD CONSTRUCTION FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY BOLLARD INSTALLED WITHOUT ITS FINAL LOCATION APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS SUBJECT TO RELOCATION AT THE SOLE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. SHRUBS- STAKEOUT ALL PLANTING BEDS AND THE LAYOUT OF ACTUAL CONTAINER LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ONSITE PRIOR TODIGGING HOLES FOR PLANTING . TREES- STAKE ALL TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DIGGING HOLES ANY TREE PLANTED WITHOUT ITS FINAL LOCATION APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS SUBJECT TO RELOCATION AT THE SOLE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ENSURE PROPER COORDINATION OF ALL FOOTINGS, BOLLARDS, SUB -STRUCTURE, AND UTILITIES ELECTRICAL - STAKE THE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. REVIEW WITH PROPOSED TREE STAKING MENTIONED ABOVE. ANY SITE LIGHTING INSTALLED WITHOUT ITS FINAL LOCATION APPROVED BYTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IG SUBJECT TO RELOCATION ATTHE SOLE EXPENSE OFTHE CONTRACTOR. 12 IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIAL FREE OF PEST OR PLANT DISEASES PRE -SELECTED `TAGGED" PLANT MATERIAL MUST BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND BE CERTIFIED PEST AND DISEASEFREE IT IS THE CONTRACTORS OBLIGATION TO WARRANTY THE PLANT MATERIAL PER SPECIFICATIONS. 13. ALL SHRUB AND GROUND COVER AREAS (EXCLUDING TURF AND SLOPE AREAS) ARE TO BE MULCHED WITH WOOD PER SPECIFICATIONS. REFER TO THE DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFIC LOCATIONS. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALWAYS ASSUME THE SMALLER SIZE OF EACH PLANT WHEN A RANGE IS GIVEN CONCERNING SPACING!. PLANT TYPE X IS I2'TO 1 B'WIDE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE I2 -(THE SMALLER SIZE) TO ESTIMATE PLANTS REQUIRED TO FILL ANY GIVEN AREA. CITYAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISNJN PLAN CFidL 11110 ITAL IMRYII 0% µ itpml RMWLMD ONN6AF 4n flo Ift 160 om AREWaOW ^^� PLANTING PLANS A. Noeea ere , L6.02.00 11337777 7I � '+•.,... r. I = �=I FA PLANTING QUICK LEGEND PROJECT TREE PLANTING / B! COJRIA PAI1 �il •• � � II ' / � lay (d; � `a� `. i:a. I y; � `,i �; I � I�� la�. 3A' B0% 156^ T0%I GAL MATERIAL 012' 0C JLUAl 1Af1UAOA M'AVSNDCU INATI•TN,W1C J1CAA0.l 30%10 GAL MATERIAL 036' 0 C �_ ��.���5" I a ALL PLANTED AREAS TO BE 100% DRIP IRRIGATED, ��s F -iz– �s - •--s --^iTTx � irs �-- _ ifs C OA 2 BUBBLERS PER TREE 5/ ae• Box �J71 36. Box THE LIONS PARK JMM3 JJCAAwEL IIwosAIXIA AILLTPTPXM[ JACARANDA PROJECT 24•BOX eJWlw, Fr mks �����•.••• PHASE 2 JM51 JACARANDA MIMOSIFOLIA STANDARD JACARANDA Xr BOX — ARCHITECT JMB! JATJNA[XfAAFUypSUT.'luaTFafMBD JACAIUNOA JAC DRAFT - 1 I / NOT FOR rrr��� JYA SCANIVA3W01RRIASTAINOW JPCARANDA �lugi 8 24 -BOX IITERIABIPINNATA I— ArcAlleclure end U111" D-11"CHINES TRE CHINESE TAME E I Begg gM�'Cray` pmrA Floor V✓'NP wBOX (TN131Dd5&fiis0'lFm9afPBega]3g OE ONEEILMAGELLIM'NII ClIN EUE OAK ED, BOX ARCHCT LANDSWE UNDERS70RY PLANTING IJ i� O�Y I THE FB RNETT • • y e r r ^ F .T Rv vERBEruuuclxn •DauMAR• I , g,m, w� s°A UTACVERBENA I I � V Wye. C - 5GAL 03G•OC � 1 A I I — ir , II >+11Q '7 lj2 10, ' a6Z'-) c'._. _ L 1 tll r l r ' 11337777 7I � '+•.,... r. I = �=I FA PLANTING QUICK LEGEND PROJECT TREE PLANTING / B! COJRIA PAI1 SYSTEMS UNDERGROUND ANCHORING SYSTEMS WII AUBiMLMN LLOW L PwmW KAI W1IWI. AS F0IAOMIL 3A' B0% T0%I GAL MATERIAL 012' 0C JLUAl 1Af1UAOA M'AVSNDCU INATI•TN,W1C J1CAA0.l 30%10 GAL MATERIAL 036' 0 C Ar BOX a ALL PLANTED AREAS TO BE 100% DRIP IRRIGATED, AAATL[ADA AOW:ROIIA NLTFTWIX[ AUTOMATIC IRRIGATE ALLTREES WRH A MINIMUM OF C OA 2 BUBBLERS PER TREE 5/ ae• Box �J71 36. Box THE LIONS PARK JMM3 JJCAAwEL IIwosAIXIA AILLTPTPXM[ JACARANDA PROJECT 24•BOX eJWlw, Fr mks �����•.••• PHASE 2 JM51 JACARANDA MIMOSIFOLIA STANDARD JACARANDA Xr BOX — ARCHITECT JMB! JATJNA[XfAAFUypSUT.'luaTFafMBD JACAIUNOA JAC DRAFT - NOT FOR rrr��� JYA SCANIVA3W01RRIASTAINOW JPCARANDA �lugi 8 24 -BOX IITERIABIPINNATA ArcAlleclure end U111" D-11"CHINES TRE CHINESE TAME E Begg gM�'Cray` pmrA Floor V✓'NP wBOX (TN131Dd5&fiis0'lFm9afPBega]3g OE ONEEILMAGELLIM'NII ClIN EUE OAK ED, BOX ARCHCT LANDSWE UNDERS70RY PLANTING O�Y I THE FB RNETT • • y e r r ^ F .T Rv vERBEruuuclxn •DauMAR• g,m, w� s°A UTACVERBENA Wye. C - 5GAL 03G•OC NOTES: B ULLTAGROUND NCEiNG M�9 SYSTEMS UNDERGROUND ANCHORING SYSTEMS L PwmW KAI W1IWI. AS F0IAOMIL T0%I GAL MATERIAL 012' 0C 30%10 GAL MATERIAL 036' 0 C a ALL PLANTED AREAS TO BE 100% DRIP IRRIGATED, AUTOMATIC IRRIGATE ALLTREES WRH A MINIMUM OF 2 BUBBLERS PER TREE A MID SCC MANNWM THIMIlIr. «...--.._ LIMIT OE WORM eJWlw, Fr mks �����•.••• /MJ•TBT; ril 00I STAMP cmAPPRovALs DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION n6BFlin PLANTING PLANS �mAe Notes .��. ..esr. cW-ool. 0 510 20 L6.02.01 SCALE: EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2 - PHASE 2 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEW - PHASE 2 scue: +=a+ 2 E: Al i.M EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEW 3 - PHASE 2 $cA„� 3 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEW 4 - PHASE 2 1 —E`"'�4]_ THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t�vRis N A.cAnea - ead U.eea oee)aa sMe Oleet�alMrebee� Ana Fb« pdscLJ, raeor..z (fe1)31� (F.) ]1a55481N CONSULTING ENGINEERS O Jeetvn/v.n+f )015 ��� ARCHITECTS/ENGINES STAMP CITY PROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RIAN ta+Eacsul3LanAL tv,sne soxw sultMrrrAL ttnane tw%w SUBMITTAL IIM,M,B No taSue Oe,e EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS - PHASE2 ewe Ae Name wF December 1B, 2076 wuxver JF rrorc*e 1fiO3 A1.2.01 US IN �.�0 �N A-11 SITE PLAN -PHASE 2 OVERVIEW SCALE: 1 ,,�,• �,,,1 r-wa• PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT tlugi 8 N Ar,b/te,ture end Urben Del/g, B1Be NedxaHer Bbeel DNUM Fbar QMGy, CA W31 Rrl atocc9ano (Fw a+oAs.aim CONSULTING ENGINEERS O Jolneon Fevem 2515 ARCHOECTS / ENGINEER'S STAMP CRVAPPROVAL DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PI-ANCHECKSUBMITTAL 12/19/15 59%CD SUBMITTAL 11/19/18 199%DD SUBMITTAL 99111915 tllo%so sueMrrira annlie Nn Issue Dale d{iy51 R[NIIdIB SITE PLAN - PHASE 2 -..- MNo d — De bx19,2015 wxwm JFK' - n2wer ylp A1.2.11 BIM i IPROJECT 1 _ I� _------ - - - - ^ - -- --- -- - - � ` '--- - -- 1-- _ ___ - - ll - it 1 • o i i � p n THE LIONS PARK / I , doa4 •, M1 t 4 PROJECTS ] Q I I •�?'''.� i I ARCHITECT -•1. ll •� I • + --, - ��3--•— �I a.�nlro�rn.e ane u.nan Oeslpn . L � , I I sae° anarab. G�emaam va.. A ' I RN7919SaB3T10 (Fu13fOJaie9}SI j I CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5 _.�� � �--•-------------rel-- � _.._��--... �.---� - STOP • , •41 ■ —.�.—. ���� � II� OJohn.on Favem 2111fi • ARCHITECTS / ENGINEER'S STAMP \ •rl �' `tea � `I• � � ,aaaaaa�.wM • � i ' I t 1 I a CRY APPROVALS t� • DRAFT - f ° NOT FOR • • , •� � � 4 ��.. i �i CONSTRUCTION �. � REVISION 31 � • .I, i� I� I O PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL 12119/13 rl+ • l; %CD SUBMRTAL 11113113 • . •• a 1fi3ep%DD SUBMITTAL D8116/13 • � �� , 100%SD SUBMITTAL fNH&13 ••y I�__—.—_—_—_ ;I Na ISSUData • � ISSUEIREVISIONS SITE PLAN -PHASE AiJiI I 2 KEY PLAN •_ ♦I I _ I _ _ j _ O - — .rxe A.No d w. D.w..Lp,F 2ota JF 4 J—/j + L._.—.—._.J N A1.2.12 8 8 CALe' SITE PLAN - PHASE 2 s'�;i 1 mlr • ra BIM PROJECT / THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS --------------------- .._--- -�-------------------- --- -� [� I ARCHITECT ■ r -------------------—--- 7 — Y Arahllecture ontl Urhen Deslgn 1 P a� (,dISt055�95T30cay(Fa)91Ou5` ae]30 i aA. i I F i• ,,,, • ' a • • O . , ` • a • I , CONSULTING ENGINEERS • i . 1 G7 • a . : I n4 is i I I —_____..___, I a "� I I I I I I I I 7 L_ ---J I i�--� yj , 1 OJOMeon Fevem 201b • —'�• i • 1 • I Anu u1 LC1�S+E4nWEEit:.'.}AMn i C' • i NCC CITY APPROVALS e i J • DRAFT - - NOT FOR • a I CONSTRUCTION • •° i I • I . a REVISION St — • —e • • ' PLAN CHECK SUBM,RAL 1211S71a r } • •. • -- P 0—I -. I W% DO SUBMITTAL ,VVV1S • • . , ` ' — . 1t0%OO SUSMIITAL 04116/19 i 100%SO SUBMIRAL 0111S/16 . i Na ISSUE Date ISSUEIREVIS40NS A d i SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS e-... Ae Noted — LWa'rlp IEVL6 ow.»wm JF ur�x noec,e 1605 A1.2.14 Vq �' NCC — ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: PEF11. 14 1 I } i { } i i i 1 I 1, 4i1Rk P0404 . f F�fIN9 I I I I I I - I k 1 1 N Ala„� NCC - FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 KMOTES \tlw nE - uem9Ewu �i/a I THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t�u� 18 N A rvh/9e e9ure end UrhEv UEEIev 689E eYa¢EelEw9E� GmunE Flow CJ.tr CE/.G9olal tralamaasarm ffWa,EssEess9 CONSULTING ENGINEERS _ a�Mww�iM O.ItlEron FaFs92n1fi ~vsr� ARCWMCMIENGINEE SSTAMP CGYAPPR vV DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION F9ANC1E &Sa AL 1y1e/19 60% CD SVMNTTA 1y1N1e tee% W 6UBUM. w1N1e tW%8D SUaM11TAL "We Nv Issas Date 661E 1 NEN610N6 NCC FIRST FLOOR PLAN me AENftd can DxeviSMWXM �F �m . A2.2.11 -A BSM 1 1 I { 1 1 1 1 `o mime Ock EXWTTG Y - C l' ! I I I I I I I I I I I f i ( I I I I I I I I I I - —L I I SCALE: r - N Azs,1a NCC - FIRST FLOOR PLAN - BANQUET •1R� •� THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT �%u is" A.c A/,eote.e end u.Aee uee/se wee m.a..M.r so --MF asA.cm' cAeoxsx R'o316w6eT10 (-)5— CONSULTING ENGINEERS w� o Jotiypn FiRe�R X515 —'� ARCHGECTS / ENGINEER'S STAMP CRVAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 16 SO SUSMRTA 61118/15 1 NCC FIRST FLOOR PLAN -BANQUET erre A. Noted arc Ihvs "10. ]515 wwnn JF oreamm A2.2.11 -B I e —------------------------^----- •I I KEYNOTES m N T.O. Roof NEW NCCSCALE: I —' -11 1 RER THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT N A1enn.,ml..oa u.6.e o.<lv, Gem erase. B6eel, Gaunt Floor an.ar,uemu (lN, 31elbefiie0 (FW 31066@Em0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS O]N�„bnF.�•vo 3346 ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS STAMP CITVAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISION 01 So NCC ROOF PLAN ecuE A, Nate w� C wrt Iv-:P4� auxxm JF r. 1603 A2.2.12 -A C� an 66. T�ft�II�IIiII�� all n1a,u NCC NORTH ELEVATION RENDER ISCALE: 0 5 —OA SCALE' M1,fA NCC EAST ELEVATION RENDER REF 2 PROJECT KEYNOTES VJmr l Mod 3; ILL ROOFING WITH 1-1f1 ..SIl1dD.l+lfSiSEAM_ 2 VNTERIOR GLA7JN ; BUTT JOINT; 3 CERAMICM BOARD-FORM'TILE- NCC TILE- uLAM - 5 fVCC N RING GIRDER -EXIST THE LIONS PARK TO REMAIN EiG PROJECTS KYLIGHTTO REPLACE EXISTING SKYLIGHT S IVCC EXISTING ARCHITECT ICONCREfE WALL A-blt..W end Uraen D..lgn cm3llhdiwAf.reOeet o..�d Roor aJ...ay. cAem3 (fN1310f6&6T10 (Fu131666Bd310 CONSULTING ENGINEERS _ _ A.brn.+a e�.oe airw O J.hu.n Favem N116 ARCHITECTS I ENOINEER'S STAMP CRYAPPROVALS DRAFT - NOT FOR PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL 12/16HB 66%CD SUBMITTAL 11NN1e 100% DO SUBMITTAL OBIIwIB 10D% SO SUBMITTAL "1Bl1a Na Issue Date ISSUEIRENslon NCC ELEVATIONNIEWS (RENDERED) .�.� A. No d are December 1B, X116 aw.m JF rroecr. I663 A4.2.11 A BIM SCALE: Aax 1z NCC SOUTH ELEVATION REF, 1 L1b'•1'ff - 9 9S - SCALE: Aa.z 1z NCC WEST ELEVATION. KEYNOTES b 1-1 ; ALRG INGVJRN 1-t7 srANDIxQ sP.u1 1N1ETh0RGlALNQ,BU3T JOIIIT: FAAMELE9s 1-1,bMGOM 1RWlRF PLASTER mcQLwa+-vesrTo REMMN I FJ(IST TO REMAIN ewe THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT Au�is" Arnblleclere end Urban Dee/0n ebm bYdxaMv seee� Gam Poor cu..crtr. -v (fMl3ladb&bTiO (FaF.) M3foss4eim CONSULTING ENGINEERS GJ�F-2015 �•��, ARCHRECTS I ENGINEERS STAMP CRYAPPROVA DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 50%DO DTAL 11 110/16 700%DD SUBMfsuBMRAL OSHN10 NCC ELEVATIONS/VIEWS —..e A. Na d — D-1-19,016 wux.m JF Hoerr 1503 A4.2.12 Gotham Narrow Medium ABCDEFGH IJKLM NOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Gotham Medium ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Gotham Bold ABODE FG H lJ KLM N OPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Gill Sans ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Cooper Black ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abedef ghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz P -ECT 4 THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ALC94, M85, Y25, K1 l . CO, M0, Y0, K100 ARCHITECT Mythical 660 Afflo, A rcbileclure an0 Urban Oe sign ITell ]10559580 IFexl �+assgazz9 CO, M80, Y95, KO © ' � CO, M0, Y0, KO TawnyDayLily CONSULTING ENGINEERS C47, M4, Y100, KO ID C58, M40, Y38, K5 - LimeGreen Montipere C35, M4, Y100, KO CO, MO, Y0, K80 BrightUrne 4D 80% Black C14, MO, Y74, KO 13 Die cut Vinyl �JoMmn Favam 2015�a�v��s LimeLight 3M Frosted Crystal AIRnF Cz3 YNfiiiPR55*uy CO, MSS, Y98, KO C58, M65, Y70, K64 OrangeJuice 40 3M Frosted Crystal CO, M31,Y100, KO GoldenNugget 8 C7, M17,Y91, KO Yolk =No C100, MO, Y0, KO 3M Frosted Crystal C44, M98, Y3, KO ID 3M Frosted Crystal cm Aewbv 11 mica suer R flmn� too�A oo eutwFtx wnvta LIONS PARK PROJECTS TYPE/COLOR �rE AS Note) .+ 9t[.ar 7a mo SG2.01 BM 0 Building ID (Site) Site Directional ift Site Directional (One Sided) Building ID Secondary Building ID Area I D 0 Information Desk BN05 Entrance Information 1.00 ® Restroom ID Restroom ID (Title 24) Room ID Maximum Occupancy is Wall Directional 119 Exit, Exit Directional BN 12 Stairwell ID / Emergency Exit 1.00 ►� Free-standing Directional ISA Symbol No Smoking Symbol End Panels BNls Emergency Exit Elevator 1.vo . Vestibule Directional 41h Elevator Directory qu ` ADA Parking Sign ADA Parking Icon THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT AQgi 8 " A 1cbllecf0 re and Urban Design ITell Oe sse sno lFu11a0 9axzo CONSULTING ENGINEERS DJobn�n Fa am 2015 �� ARCHRECTS I ENGINEERS STAMP PROVALS I PL CHECK SUGM- WWI$ WO' m LIONS PARK PROJECTS SIGN TYPES Yw qa Nolen Oe ..120, 2010 SG2.02 J NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CENTER BNO1 Building ID (NCC) BN08 Room ID C� BN14 ISA Symbol NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CENTER BN02 Secondary Building ID (NCC) MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY 299 BN09 Maximum Occupancy 0 BN15 No Smoking Symbol O n It& ��� �� r. n � i111 MEN '� '7r fE1 RESTROOM {� 1 BN06 Restroom ID, (NCC) <- COSTA MESA ROOM -T-RESTROOMS BN 10 Wall Directional - 100 - BN07 Restroom ID, Title 24 (NCC) EXIT ROUTE BN11 Emergency Exit THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t1ul 8 N A r chif, Fe end Urhen Design 5999 He S r ITeO atuss>sno IFe.)3�1n5S49220 CONSULTING ENGINEERS VJohnwn F— MS a � ±. �uAtCTS r p1[p1.3R�i SiA W CITY APPROVALS PLANCHECKSUWffTAL 12119/19 SOY. COSUHWM 11110110 100%00 SURMfRAL O9I 119 LIONS PARK PROJECTS SIGN SUMMARY AS NOIeO yr N.. W110.2019 +tee•. typ SG2.03 1 0 `- NCC - FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: er . rw KEYNOTES IV I t FMKI 0 .oworcwrz r.>ai Building ID (Site) Site Directional Site Directional (One Sided) Building ID 0 Secondary Building ID 11"i Area ID Information Desk WI)l Entrance Information Restroom ID Restroom ID (Title 24) Room ID Maximum Occupancy Wall Directional Exit, Fait Directional aY54. Stairwell ID / Emergency Exit 1,0.! Free-standing Directional �y ISA Symbol No Smoking Symbol End Panels Emergency Exit Elevator Vestibule Directional Elevator Directory ADA Parking Sign ® ADA Parking Icon Emergency Exit Sign 9r .; g Y g E im PROJECT r THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT N rc M1llecfura a e Urben Oesign Al— 58 treel Omune (re)al 5-57MMCFaA.liias (-)-5-57M Floor —1. CONSULTING ENGINEERS QJohnson Favaro 2015 prawn~�� I)ICN119.T31 R/r4v4�r3 aTrtra 011PR—LS DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1. 100%00 SUSMI—L 0011501 1 NCC FIRST FLOOR PLAN w• = M Ne1M r Homier 1A 0110 w.wx JF wc0i-na`" - waq>a qp1 acyX,IA1 BIM SIGN MESSAGE SCHEDULE - COSTA MESA LIBRARY, LIBRARY ;SignIdentification Identification Nomenclature (Messaging) Notes Nomenclature (Messaging) Notes 'SNOT Directional Building ID (Site) 1 02Wall SN02 BN11 Site Directional Exit, Exit Directional SN02A% 1.02 Site Directional (One Sided) BN11 BNO1 Exit, Exit Directional Building ID 1.04 BN02 BN11 Secondary Building ID Exit, Exit Directional BN03 1.06 Area ID BN11 BN0 , Exit Directional (Information Desk 1.08, BNO5 BN11 Entrance Information Exit Directional Exit Directional BN06 BN14 Restroom ID mp01 BN07 1,01Smokin Restroom ID (Title 24) BN20 BN20 ENDS Emergency Exit Only Emer ency Exit Only Room ID 1.03 1 04 BN09 Maximum Occupancy BN10 Wall Directional BN11 Exit, Exit Directional BN 12Stairwell ID, Emergency Exit BN 13 Free-standing Directional BN14 ISA Symbol BN15 No Smoking Symbol BN16 End Panels BN18 Emergency Exit Elevator BN19 Vestibule Directional BN20Elevator Directory BN21 APA Parking Sign BN22 ADA Parking Icon BN23 Emergency Exit Only Sign a ou Identification Nomenclature (Messaging) Notes SN02 1.01 Site Directional SN02 1 02 4;4e Directional BNOl Building ID Neighborhood Community Center BN02 5econdary Bulldmg ID BNO5 I03ReStr..m Entrance Information ,BN06 Restroom ID Women + [SA Symbol ,BN06 Restroom ID Menen + ISA Symbol IBNO6 ID Men + Women and ISA Symbols ,BN07 Restroom ID (Title 24) Women + ISA Symbol IBN07 Restroom ID (Title 24) Men + ISA Symbol IBN07 Restroom [D (Title 24) Men +Women and [SA Symbols •BNOS 11.04R.o. Room ID Office BNOB Room ID Electrical Room SNOB Room ID Meeting Room SNOB ID Meeting Room BNO8 Room [D Storage BNO8 Room ID Meeting Room BNOB Room ID Storage BNOB 11-1111 Room ID Catering Staging Area KNOB Roam ID Catering Staging Area SNOB Room ID IDE SNOB oom ID Catering Staging Area BN09 1 Ol Maximum Occupancy BN09 1 02 Maximum Occupancy Sign Identification Nomenclature (Messaging) Notes BN10 1 Ol Ik.AWall Directional BN10 1 02Wall Directional BN11 L.01 Exit, Exit Directional BN11 1.02 Exit, Exit Directional BN11 1.03 Exit, Exit Directional BN11 1.04 Exit, Exit Directional BN11 1.05 Exit, Exit Directional BN11 1.06 Exit, Exit Directional BN11 1.07[Exit, , Exit Directional BN11 1.08, Exit Directional BN11 1.09 Exit Directional Exit Directional BN11 1.10, BN14 1.01S mp01 BN15 1,01Smokin Symbol BN20 BN20 1.01 1.02 Emergency Exit Only Emer ency Exit Only BN20 BN20 1.03 1 04 Emergency Exit Only Emergency Exit Only - 1 02.� THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t9ki 8 N Archileclure and Urban Dea,gn ITep ­ -51M'r., i o�ssA exai CONSULTING ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS / ENGINEER'S STAMP PLANCHECKSUBMITAL1"N 2 M%CD SUBMITTAL I1IIW19 100°/ OD SUBMITTAL D1—S -SD SUBMITTAL 04119119 va Issue Dale ISSUE) REVISIONS LIONS PARK PROJECTS SIGN SCHEDULE NCC _ AsN W —P November 10, 20In 1Yn SG2.05 BIM NOTES • Panel-27'-9',12't4'Depth • u4mi• ditminiinr nL490% • Finish •Painled • Attachment -Mechanically to concrele nng beam • 100% artwork of all sign gr. be supplied to fabooator m placement in sign panel Nate: SignvIil fi folLlbndon rn cnl,U rn9 imnc anH neo wam s "NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CENTER BNO1 - Front View -Sign IN CC) Scale - 1/2' = 1' - 0' —1 0--N i--� 12 B NO - Front Vew -Letter 81,01 - Side Vew - Letter Scale -11/2'=P-0' Scale -11/2'=1'-0 BNO1 - Building ID (NCC) DN02/1-OI -Building ID (NCCI Scale - 1/2' = V - 0' NEIGHBORHOOD -,S COMMUNITY -0 CENTER BNO2/1.01 • 3ulldmg ID (NCCI Scale - 1 1/2' - 1'- 0' BN02 - Secondary Building ID (NCC) 25' NOTES Letters - Water.let or Laser cut W`V • AUohinuun • 0f1100 • Pin mounted w/ sho.na adhesive • 100% anwark of all sign graphics will be suppled to fabncator in correct placementm sign panel BN02/1-01 - Building ID (NCC) Scale - 1 1/2' - 1' - 0' r+ I 10' 6' letters hush wllh concrete rmg far BNO1 (NCC) - Section Elevation Scale - 1/2' = 1' - 0' BNO1 - Building ID (NCC) NOTES • 2 Panels of 1/9' Ih¢Mess • Matenal -Cast Acrylic • Graphics - 1/32' raised Graot Or equivalent type with 1/16' balls for Drallle press IR+screen printed Icons • Attachmenl- 311A transfer adhesive+ silicone adheave used between panels and wall attachment • 100 % artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator In correct placement in sign panel BNO6- Elevation (NCC) Scale - 1/2" = 1'-0' BN06 - Restroom ID (NCC) Removea"a back for assemble of letters to ,mg plate Aluminum can letters AINC+1etl 10 ang $Wk one, to Installation in manageable sections 375'x6'alum nng gIW n[G%Ndnt wdhl! KNer Yylinsetl'from Iront edge. lift , 45VAI;H to concrete v h Halle HDI Flush Anchors BNOl (NCC) - Letterassembly installation Scale - 6' = 1' - 0' 12' I THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT RU 18 N Archilecl... and Urban C—ga CUM1erC4 CA9ma2� CONSULTING ENGINEERS JOhn»n Favem20;5— ARCHITECTS I ENGINEER'S STAMP 0 n MEN WOMEN RESTROOM CIN APPROVALS A>s 1129 OHEVISION al n., to 900 !� S 76' MEN PIAN CHECK SUISNITfAL 12119116 S0%CO SUBMnTAL 11I1011fi 10a'hb0 SUBMnTAL OB/15116 10M SO SUBMITTAL 04/19116 No- Issue Data �- ISSUE I REVISIONS BN06 - Front View (NCC) BNO6 - Side Vim (NCC) scale -6'=1'-0' si; t 6'.I o' LIONS PARK PROJECTS sr� AS Noletl Jnr Nwem0er 10. 2018 con• apJ a,rID SG2.06 wy� NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY 1 CENTER 72' DN02/1-OI -Building ID (NCCI Scale - 1/2' = V - 0' NEIGHBORHOOD -,S COMMUNITY -0 CENTER BNO2/1.01 • 3ulldmg ID (NCCI Scale - 1 1/2' - 1'- 0' BN02 - Secondary Building ID (NCC) 25' NOTES Letters - Water.let or Laser cut W`V • AUohinuun • 0f1100 • Pin mounted w/ sho.na adhesive • 100% anwark of all sign graphics will be suppled to fabncator in correct placementm sign panel BN02/1-01 - Building ID (NCC) Scale - 1 1/2' - 1' - 0' r+ I 10' 6' letters hush wllh concrete rmg far BNO1 (NCC) - Section Elevation Scale - 1/2' = 1' - 0' BNO1 - Building ID (NCC) NOTES • 2 Panels of 1/9' Ih¢Mess • Matenal -Cast Acrylic • Graphics - 1/32' raised Graot Or equivalent type with 1/16' balls for Drallle press IR+screen printed Icons • Attachmenl- 311A transfer adhesive+ silicone adheave used between panels and wall attachment • 100 % artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator In correct placement in sign panel BNO6- Elevation (NCC) Scale - 1/2" = 1'-0' BN06 - Restroom ID (NCC) Removea"a back for assemble of letters to ,mg plate Aluminum can letters AINC+1etl 10 ang $Wk one, to Installation in manageable sections 375'x6'alum nng gIW n[G%Ndnt wdhl! KNer Yylinsetl'from Iront edge. lift , 45VAI;H to concrete v h Halle HDI Flush Anchors BNOl (NCC) - Letterassembly installation Scale - 6' = 1' - 0' 12' I THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT RU 18 N Archilecl... and Urban C—ga CUM1erC4 CA9ma2� CONSULTING ENGINEERS JOhn»n Favem20;5— ARCHITECTS I ENGINEER'S STAMP 0 n MEN WOMEN RESTROOM CIN APPROVALS A>s 1129 OHEVISION al n., to 900 !� S 76' MEN PIAN CHECK SUISNITfAL 12119116 S0%CO SUBMnTAL 11I1011fi 10a'hb0 SUBMnTAL OB/15116 10M SO SUBMITTAL 04/19116 No- Issue Data �- ISSUE I REVISIONS BN06 - Front View (NCC) BNO6 - Side Vim (NCC) scale -6'=1'-0' si; t 6'.I o' LIONS PARK PROJECTS sr� AS Noletl Jnr Nwem0er 10. 2018 con• apJ a,rID SG2.06 NOTES 14 •Panel - 12' 0. or l2'per side x 1/4' Thickness • Material - Cast Acrylic • Graphics- Screen printed graphics • Are chment-3Mtransfer adhesive+ silicone adhesive • 100%artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabncafor in correct placement In sign panel C Roo 0.50' 0 12' Dia n }- W w(NCC) BN07 - Elevator, View (NCC) BN07 - Front View ( NCC) BN07 - Front Vie Scale - 1/2' = 1'-0' Scale - 6' = F-0' Scale - 6' = 1'-0' BN07 - Restroom ID, Title 24 (NCC) NOTES • 2 Panels el 1111' thickness • Material - Cast Acrylic • Graphics • 1132' raised GravoTac or equivalent type with 1/16• balls lYf219l plkf6 R ♦'JOtppl W-klC U.t11r! • A*hlveat 3111i0rr111rpTAtl��MraniF ed beMeen panels and wall allachment • 100°/ artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to fabricator in correct placement in sign panel 60'1a center of sgo BN09 - Elevation View Scale - 1/2' = 1' -0" BN09 - Maximum Occupancy (NCC) MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY 299- BNO9 - Front View V BNO9 - Side View Scale -6'=1'-0' NOTES • Panel- 2 panels al llH' thickness • Manorial -Cast Acryllc • Graphics -1132' ralsed GravoTac or equivalent type with 1116' balls fa Bra life, press It • Attachment -3M transfer adhesive+siicene adhesive sed between panels and wen attachment • For glass condition, apply flnod—ted char vinyl of the same type color on 'hep rst surface prior to sign applicafwn • 100% artwork of all sign graphics well be supplied to Fabricator in Const placemen) in sign panel Conlexl El—hoo (NCC) Seale - 112'- l' -O' BN08 - Room ID (NCC) 25' 10 STORAGE 7 75' Elevation (NCC) Scale - 6'= L'- 0" Side View (NCC) Scale - 6' = F- 0' PROJECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT t1ugis, Archileelu re end Urban Design sa w,•w• cn saz�im m•fimass9e12oI1-131O —ae CONSULTING ENGINEERS p JOMson Fevem 2015 ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS STAMP CITY APPROVALS BN1O/1,02 • Wall Directional (NCC) Scale -112'=l'•0' NOTES � �dje1i"�wfcut COSTA MESA ROOM-- m • Rn ennted vii silicone aahera:i.e • 10i aril of all sign graphics will be supplied le labricala in correct placement In sign panel q• �RESTROOMS BN101102 - Wall Directional (NCCI ON r,0/ 402 - Side blew (NCC) Scale -1112'=1'-0' scale -1 112'=1'-0' BN10 - Wall Directional (NCC) ►/�v�/�y � ■ PLAN CHECK Vufl& -1L U.M. 1-11ILgM-FAL 1'nen' Tor / Go suRMrrTAE oensne TOT. 6u0NRiAL M.", 1a IhAUP uViE r9ArE/XEYi910Ns •� LIONS PARK PROJECTS �� As NoleA vin. November lq ZOlfi S G 2.07 3i•r NOTES 65' • I Panel .1 1/4' thickness • Matenal - Cast Acrylic • Graphics - or Br raised press fit ac or equivalent type win EXIT STA ! R 1/16' balls far braille, press Id+screen printed Irons • Attachment -3M transfer atlhesrve+ silicone aches— used between panels and wall attachment • 00% artwork of all sign graphics will be supplied to falancolor m correct placement in sign panel DOWN 65, EXIT ROUTE 4 5' 65' y r 025' EXIT IQ BNll - Elevation View 311,111 - Sitle View 3/4 Size 3/4 Size BN11 - Emergency Exit (NCC) 6N15 - Front View NOTES • Panel - 6' x 6' x3 Mil thickness • Attachment- Vinyl with adhesive back • 100% artwork oFall iP4lg06Nd I0 fabricator in correct D Adan in sign panel SN IS - Front View Full Scale Full Scale BN15 - No Smoking Symbol (NCC) i BN14 - Front Vlew Full Scale BN14 - ISA Symbol (NCC) -105 -- NOTES • Panel -6'x6'x3Mtllha:kd— • Attacnin Vinyl with adhesive back • 100 % artwork of alla�l'g1pNC1M IM 1u00kW la labncalor m correcliVC �^erJ m sign panel }—� 6 00' BN14 - Front View cull Scale FPCJECT fr. -- y„�jl THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCHITECT AM 8 N k1rhil cr— and Urban Oesigo CONSULTING ENGINEERS '9 Johnin Favam 2015 � m� W ClprxC f8 a QXIVIlGM13 FFNu' AL^A Stull PIAN CHECK SUBMITTAL -CD SUBMITTAL 12n511e 1111010 1009600 SUBMITTAL Dell S(16 10m650 sMNTAL 0411016 No Issue Dale ISSUE I REVISIONS LIONS PARK PROJECTS AS No. — November 10, 2e10 a�ws� 1503 SG2.08 ATTACHMENT 7 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION To: X X From: City of Costa Mesa Office of Planning and Research County Clerk 77 Fair Drive - t 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 County of Orange Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Sacramento, CA 95814 P.O. Box 22013 ` Santa Ana, CA 92702 Date: February 13, 2017 TO: Interested Agencies, Organizations, and Individuals NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 15072 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Costa Mesa hereby gives notice that a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Lions Park Projects is available for review and comment. PROJECT TITLE: Lions Park Projects (Master Plan PA -16-71) PROJECT LOCATION: The Proposed Project is located at Lions Park, 570 West 18th Street, 1845 and 1855 Park Avenue, Costa Mesa, California 92627. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Proposed Project includes three individual projects to be completed in two successive construction phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2). The three projects include: Improvements to Lions Park and new signage, including building signs and directional/wayfinding signs (Phase 1): Demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) and construction of a new library building and cafe (Phase 1): and Renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library building to be repurposed as the new Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) (Phase 2). Phase 1 The improvements to Lions Park include the demolition of the existing NCC, construction of a new snack and beverage service kiosk, a new surface parking lot, and off-site street improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues. The existing NCC would be demolished to make room for the new library and to increase park open space by approximately one acre. The new snack and beverage service kiosk would measure approximately 1,146 square feet (SF) and would serve the park and all facilities in the park. The new surface parking lot would be located in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and provide approximately 22 new parking spaces. This new parking lot would be accessed from Anaheim Avenue. Off-site street improvements include improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues. Improvements are detailed below: Park Avenue improvements include new sidewalks, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, street trees, street furnishings, and 27 new parking spaces. These improvements would affect approximately 580 linear feet (LF) of street frontage and 17,430 SF in area. Anaheim Avenue improvements include new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, and street trees. These improvements would affect approximately 145 LF of street frontage and 2,350 SF in area. Phase 1 of the Proposed Project also includes the construction of a new two-story 23,355 SF library to be built just south of the existing NCC building. The first floor would include a multipurpose room, market place, circulation workroom, meeting room, friends workroom, staff workroom, restrooms, children's library, and early childhood area. The second floor would include a staff workroom, staff lounge, staff restrooms, two study rooms, public restrooms, adult collections, and a teen room. The new library would be designed to achieve a U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) rating of Gold. Phase 2 Phase 2 of the Proposed Project includes the renovation of the existing 8,740 SF Donald Dungan Library to be repurposed as the new NCC. The renovation includes minor floor area expansion totaling approximately 600 SF to include a new NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A ND -MND catering kitchen, new exterior glazing and entrance doors, new mechanical equipment, electrical panels, new lighting, and audio visual/information technology equipment and infrastructure. The renovation also includes a new walled loading/delivery area to serve the facility, site landscaping immediately surrounding the building, and a new slurry coat finish and restriping of the Park Avenue surface parking lot located at the front of the building. The renovated building would be designed to achieve a USGBC LEED rating of Silver. PROJECT IMPACTS: The Initial Study/MND was completed in accordance with the Lead Agency's Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. The Initial Study/MND found that the environmental effects from the project would be less than significant with the incorporation of standard conditions and mitigation measures. HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES: Pursuant to Section 15072(g)(5) of the Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act, the City acknowledges the non-existence of hazardous waste sites within the project area reviewed by this Mitigated Negative Declaration. PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: Begins: February 13, 2017 Ends: March 4, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before a joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting on March 28, 2017, at 6:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at Costa Mesa City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review and comment for a period of 20 days. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Division of the City's Development Services Department before the end of the review period. If you challenge the City's action in court you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division prior to the end of the review period. Comments may be sent by mail, or faxed to the following address: Mel Lee, AICP, Senior Planner City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Phone: (714) 754-5611 Fax: (714) 754-4856 Email: mel.lee(d-.costamesaca.gov LOCATION WHERE DOCUMENT CAN BE REVIEWED: The Initial Study, Draft MND and supporting documents are available for review and comment on the City website at www. costa mesaca.gov and during normal business hours at the following locations: (a) City of Costa Mesa, Public Counter, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, CA, (b) Mesa Verde Library, 2969 Mesa Verde Drive, East, (c) Costa Mesa/Donald Dungan Library, 1855 Park Avenue. ///;7 Date NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A ND -MND r Mel Lee, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Costa Mesa FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN LIONS PARK PROJECTS March 2017 City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, California 92626 Prepared by: LCORP Ct msultin . Ir1C. 215 North Fifth Street Redlands, CA 92374 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration LIONS PARK PROJECTS Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Lions Park Projects Lead Agency: City Costa Mesa Project Proponent: City of Costa Mesa Project Location: Lions Park, 570 West 18th Street, 1845, and 1855 Park Avenue, Costa Mesa, California 92627 Project Description: The Lions Park Projects (Proposed Project) would be completed in two successive construction phases (Phase l and Phase 2). Project components include: 1. Improvements to Lions Park, including building signs and directional/wayfinding signs (Phase 1) 2. Demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) and construction of a new library building and cafe (Phase 1) 3. Renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library building to be repurposed as the new Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) (Phase 2) Phase 1 The improvements to Lions Park include the demolition of the existing NCC, construction of a new cafe (snack and beverage kiosk), a new surface parking lot, off-site street improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues, and building signs and directional/wayfinding signs. The existing NCC would be demolished to make room for the new library and to increase park open space by approximately one acre. The new cafe would measure approximately 890 square feet (SF) and would serve the park and all facilities in the park. The new surface parking lot would be located in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and provide approximately 20 new parking spaces. This new parking lot would be accessed from Anaheim Avenue. Off-site street improvements include improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues. Improvements are detailed below: • Park Avenue improvements include new sidewalks, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, street trees, street furnishings, and approximately 29 new parking spaces. These improvements would affect approximately 580 linear feet (LF) of street frontage and 17,430 SF in area. • Anaheim Avenue improvements include new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, and street trees. These improvements would affect approximately 145 LF of street frontage and 2,350 SF in area. Phase 1 of the Proposed Project also includes the construction of a new two-story 22,860 SF library to be built just south of the existing NCC building. The first floor would include a multipurpose room, market place, circulation workroom, meeting room, Friends of the Library workroom, staff workroom, restrooms, children's library, and early childhood area. The second floor would include a staff workroom, staff lounge, staff restrooms, two study rooms, public restrooms, adult collections, and a teen room. The new library would be designed to achieve a U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) rating of Gold. Mitigated Negative Declaration I March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Phase 2 Phase 2 of the Proposed Project includes the renovation of the existing 8,740 SF Donald Dungan Library to be repurposed as the new NCC. The renovation includes minor floor area expansion totaling approximately 600 SF to include a new catering kitchen, new exterior glazing and entrance doors, new mechanical equipment, electrical panels, new lighting, and audio visual/information technology equipment and infrastructure. The renovation also includes a new walled loading/delivery area to serve the facility, site landscaping immediately surrounding the building, and a new slurry coat finish and restriping of the Park Avenue surface parking lot located at the front of the building. The renovated building would be designed to achieve a USGBC LEED rating of Silver. Public Review Period: February 13, 2017 to March 4, 2017 Mitigation Measures Incorporated into the Project to Avoid Significant Effects: Biological Resources B-1: If construction activities occur within the bird breeding season (February ls` August 31'`), then the City (or its contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre -construction nesting bird survey no more than 30 days prior to the start of construction. The nest survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by Project activities such as noise, human activity, dust, etc. If active bird nests are found on or immediately adjacent to the Project site, then the qualified biologist will establish an appropriate buffer zone around the active nests, typically a 250 -foot radius for songbirds and a 500 -foot radius for raptors. Project activities shall be avoided within the buffer zone until the nest is deeined no longer active by the biologist. Weekly nesting surveys and biological monitoring may be necessary if nesting birds are found on the Project site. B-2: In order to avoid and minimize the potential impact to parkway trees, fencing, guarding or framing should be placed within a 5 -foot minimum distance of the tree trunk of protected trees within and adjacent to the limits of disturbance such that no work shall occur within the protected area. This would provide a full avoidance of direct impacts to trees protected under the City's municipal code. During construction the contractor shall provide sufficient water to preserve the trees and for overall health of the trees. If this is unfeasible because work cannot be avoided within the protected zone, a pen -nit or exemption shall be obtained from the City's Public Services Department, Maintenance Division. Trees removed under a pen -nit will be replaced at a ratio up to 3:1. The City will comply with the Street Tree Master Plan and all City codes on the landscaping of the Proposed Project. Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of grading permits, submit for review and approval a Construction Management Plan. This plan features methods to minimize disruption to the neighboring uses to the fullest extent that is reasonable and practicable. The plan shall include construction parking and vehicle access and specifying staging areas and delivery and hauling truck routes. The plan should mitigate disruption during construction. The truck route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas and major truck traffic during peak hours. The total truck trips to the site shall not exceed 200 trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus 100 truck trips from the site) unless approved by the Development Services Director or Transportation Services Manager. Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration TABLE OF CONTENTS Final Mitigated Negative Declaration — Lions Park Projects .................................... Mitigation Measures Incorporated into the Project to Avoid Significant Effects....... TABLEOF CONTENTS............................................................................................. SECTION1. Introduction........................................................................................... SECTION 2. Project Overview................................................................................... SECTION 3. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan ........................................... Table of Contents ........................ 1 ......................... 2 .......................... t ......................1-1 ...................... 2-1 ...................... 3-1 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents ii March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION This document is the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final IS/MND) including the the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) for the Lions Park Projects (Proposed Project). This Final IS/MND has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resource Code Section 21000 et. seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.), as amended. This Final IS/MND supplements and updates the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) released for public review on February 13, 20 t 7. The Draft IS/MND is incorporated into this Final IS/MND by reference. The City of Costa Mesa is the Lead Agency for the Proposed Project. On February 13, 2017 the City of Costa Mesa distributed the Draft IS/MND for the Proposed Project to the general public for review and comment. The document was not sent to the State Clearinghouse as there were no state approvals required. The 20 -day review period ended on March 4, 2017. During the public review period, no comment letters were received. A public hearing will be held on March 28, 2017 at the Costa Mesa Country Club. This Final IS/MND and MMRP document is organized as follows: • Section 1.0 provides a discussion of the purpose of the document and discusses the structure of the document; • Section 2.0 contains a summary of the project description; and • Section 3.0 includes the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP). This Final IS/MND and MMRP document and the Draft IS/MND together constitute the environmental document for the Proposed Project. Introduction 1-1 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Introduction 1-2 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SECTION 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW 2.1 Project Location The project site is located at Lions Park, 570 West 18`x' Street, 1845 and 1855 Park Avenue, Costa Mesa, California 92627. Lions Park is bound by Plummer Street and the Park Center Place Apartments to the north, Park Avenue to the east, West 18`x' Street to the south, and Anaheim Avenue to the west. Lions Park measures approximately 12.8 acres. The park includes Davis Field, Costa Mesa Historical Society, Downtown Recreation Center, Downtown Aquatic Center, Neighborhood Community Center (NCC), Costa Mesa Donald Dungan Library, and Fire Station 3. The project site does not encompass all of Lions Park; only a portion which includes the Donald Dungan Library, the NCC building, a portion of parkland just south of the existing NCC, and the area between the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and Anaheim Avenue. 2.2 Project Description The Lions Park Projects (Proposed Project) would be completed in two successive construction phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2). Project components include: 1. Improvements to Lions Park, including building signs and directional/wayfinding signs (Phase 1) 2. Demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) and construction of a new library building and cafe (Phase 1) 3. Renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library building to be repurposed as the new Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) (Phase 2) Phase 1 The improvements to Lions Park include the demolition of the existing NCC, construction of a new cafe (snack and beverage kiosk), a new surface parking lot, off-site street improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues, and building signs and directional/wayfinding signs. The existing NCC would be demolished to make room for the new library and to increase park open space by approximately one acre. The new cafe would measure approximately 890 square feet (SF) and would serve the park and all facilities in the park. The new surface parking lot would be located in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and provide approximately 20 new parking spaces. This new parking lot would be accessed from Anaheim Avenue. Off-site street improvements include improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues. Improvements are detailed below: • Park Avenue improvements include new sidewalks, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, street trees, street furnishings, and approximately 29 new parking spaces. These improvements would affect approximately 580 linear feet (LF) of street frontage and 17,430 SF in area. • Anaheim Avenue improvements include new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, and street trees. These improvements would affect approximately 145 LF of street frontage and 2,350 SF in area. Phase 1 of the Proposed Project also includes the construction of a new two-story 22,860 SF library to be built just south of the existing NCC building. The first floor would include a multipurpose room, market Project Overview 2-1 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration place, circulation workroom, meeting room, Friends of the Library workroom, staff workroom, restrooms, children's library, and early childhood area. The second floor would include a staff workroom, staff lounge, staff restrooms, two study rooms, public restrooms, adult collections, and a teen room. The new library would be designed to achieve a U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) rating of Gold. Phase 2 Phase 2 of the Proposed Project includes the renovation of the existing 8,740 SF Donald Dungan Library to be repurposed as the new NCC. The renovation includes minor floor area expansion totaling approximately 600 SF to include a new catering kitchen, new exterior glazing and entrance doors, new mechanical equipment, electrical panels, new lighting, and audio visual/information technology equipment and infrastructure. The renovation also includes a new walled loading/delivery area to serve the facility, site landscaping immediately surrounding the building, and a new slurry coat finish and restriping of the Park Avenue surface parking lot located at the front of the building. The renovated building would be designed to achieve a USGBC LEED rating of Silver. Project Overview 2-2 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SECTION 3. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN 3.1 Introduction In accordance with CEQA, an IS/MND that identified adverse impacts related to the construction activity for the Lions Park Projects was prepared. The MND identified mitigation measures that would reduce or eliminate these impacts. Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and Sections t5091(d) and 15097 of the State CEQA Guidelines require public agencies to adopt a reporting and monitoring program for changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) is required for the Proposed Project, because the IS/MND identified potentially significant adverse impacts related to construction activity, and mitigation measures have been identified to mitigate these impacts. Adoption of the MMRP will occur along with approval of the Proposed Project. 3.2 Purpose of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan This MMRP` has been prepared to ensure that all required mitigation measures are implemented and completed according to schedule and maintained in a satisfactory manner during the construction and operation of the Proposed Project, as required. during project implementation, as necessary refinements. The MMRP table (Table 3-1) implementing the MMRP. This table identifi individual mitigation measures, monitoring implementing the measure, monitoring and implementation of the mitigation numbering sequence in the IS/MND The MMRP may be modified by the City of Costa Mesa in response to changing conditions or other project has been prepared to assist the responsible parties in -s the category of significant environmental impact(s), and mitigation timing, responsible person/agency for reporting procedure, and notation space to confirm measures. The numbering of the mitigation measures follows the 3.3 Roles and Responsibilities The City of Costa Mesa, as Lead Agency, is responsible for oversight of compliance of the mitigation measures in the MMRP. 3.4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan The column categories identified in the MMRP table are described below. • Mitigation Measure — This column lists the mitigation measures by number • Monitoring Activity/Timing/Frequency/Schedule — This column lists the activity to be monitored for each mitigation measure, the timing of each activity, and the frequency/schedule of monitoring for each activity. • Implementation Responsibility/Verification This column identifies the entity responsible for complying with the requirements of the mitigation measure, and provides space for verification initials and date. • Responsibility for Oversight of Compliance/Verification — This column provides the agency responsible for oversight of the mitigation implementation, and is to be dated and initialed by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-1 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration agency representative based on the documentation provided by the construction contractor or through personal verification by agency staff. Outside Agency Coordination — this column lists any agencies with which the City of Costa Mesa may coordinate for implementation of the mitigation measure. • Comments — this column provides space for written comments, if necessary. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-2 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 3-1 Lions Park Projects Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-3 March ?017 Monitoring Implementation Responsibility for Mitigation Measures Activity/Timing/ Responsibility/ Oversight of Outside Agency Comments Frequency/Schedule Verification Compliance/ Coordination Verification Biological Resources B-1: If construction activities occur Activity: Project Biologist City of Costa Mesa Possible within the bird breeding season Conduct survey if coordination with (February I" — August 31 "), then the construction is to occur CDFW. City (or its contractor) shall retain a during breeding season. qualified biologist to conduct a pre- Biological monitoring to construction nesting bird survey no avoid active nests (if Initials Initials more than 30 days prior to the start of necessary). construction "Fhe nest survey shall include the Project site and areas Timing: immediately adjacent to the site that 30 days prior to Date Date could potentially be affected by Project construction. activities such as noise, human activity, During construction (if dust, etc. If active bird nests are found necessary). on or immediately adjacent to the Project site, then the qualified biologist will establish an appropriate buffer zone around the active nests, typically a 350 -foot radius for songbirds and a 500 -foot radius for raptors. Project activities shall be avoided within the buffer zone until the nest is deemed no longer active by the biologist. Weekly nesting surveys and biological monitoring may be necessary if nesting birds are found on the Project site. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-3 March ?017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-4 March 2017 Responsibility for Monitoring Implementation Oversight of Outside Agency Mitigation Measures Activity/Timing/ Responsibility/ Compliance/ Coordination Comments Frequency/Schedule Verification Verification B-2: In order to avoid and minimize Activity: Project Manager City of Costa Mesa Possible the potential impact to parkway trees, Existing trees shall be coordination with fencing, guarding or framing should be protected in place. If not the City of Costa placed within a 5 -foot minimum feasible a tree removal Mesa's Public Initials Initials distance of the tree trunk of protected permit will be required. Services trees within and adjacent to the limits of Department, disturbance such that no work shall Timing:. Maintenance occur within the protected area. This During construction (if Division Date Date would provide a full avoidance of direct necessary). impacts to trees protected under the City's municipal code. During construction the contractor shall provide sufficient water to preserve the trees and for overall health of the trees. Ifthis is unfeasible because work cannot be avoided within the protected zone, a permit or exemption shall be obtained from the City's Public Services Department, Maintenance Division. Trees removed under a permit will be replaced at a ratio up to 3:1. The City will comply with the Street Tree Master Plan and all City codes on the landscaping of the Pro osed Project. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-4 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-5 March 2017 Monitoring Implementation Responsibility for Mitigation Measures Activity/Timing/ Responsibility/ Oversight of Compliance/ Outside Agency Coordination Comments Frequency/Schedule Verification Verification Hazards and Hazardous Materials IIAZ�I: Prior to issuance ofgrading Activity: Project Manager City of Costa Mesa permits, submit for review and approval Preparation and a Construction Management Plan. This implementation of a plan features methods to minimize Construction Management Initials Initials disruption to the neighboring uses to Plan. the fullest extent that is reasonable and practicable. The plan shall include Timing:. construction parking and vehicle access Prior to the issuance of a Date Date and specil'ying staging areas and grading permit. delivery and hauling truck routes. The plan should mitigate disruption during construction. The truck route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas and major truck traffic during peak hours. The total truck trips to the site shall not exceed 1-00 trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus 100 truck trips from the site) unless approved by the Development Services Director or Transportation Services Manager. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-5 March 2017 Lions Park Projects Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 3-6 March 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects 570 West 18th Street, 1845, and 1855 Park Avenue February 13, 2017 City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, California 92626 Prepared by: ECORP Consulting, Inc. 215 North Fifth Street Redlands, California 92374 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LIONS PARK PROJECTS Lead Agency: City of Costa Mesa Project Proponent: City of Costa Mesa Project Location: Lions Park, 570 West 18th Street, 1845, and 1855 Park Avenue, Costa Mesa, California 92627 Project Description: The Lions Park Projects (Proposed Project) would be completed in two successive construction phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2). Project components include: 1. Improvements to Lions Park, including building signs and directional/wayfinding signs (Phase 1) 2. Demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) and construction of a new library building and cafe (Phase 1) 3. Renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library building to be repurposed as the new Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) (Phase 2) Phase 1 The improvements to Lions Park include the demolition of the existing NCC, construction of a new cafe (snack and beverage kiosk), a new surface parking lot, off-site street improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues, and building signs and directional/wayfinding signs. The existing NCC would be demolished to make room for the new library and to increase park open space by approximately one acre. The new cafe would measure approximately 890 square feet (SF) and would serve the park and all facilities in the park. The new surface parking lot would be located in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and provide approximately 20 new parking spaces. This new parking lot would be accessed from Anaheim Avenue. Off-site street improvements include improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues. Improvements are detailed below: • Park Avenue improvements include new sidewalks, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, street trees, street furnishings, and approximately 29 new parking spaces. These improvements would affect approximately 580 linear feet (LF) of street frontage and 17,430 SF in area. • Anaheim Avenue improvements include new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, and street trees. These improvements would affect approximately 145 LF of street frontage and 2,350 SF in area. Phase 1 of the Proposed Project also includes the construction of a new two-story 22,860 SF library to be built just south of the existing NCC building. The first floor would include a multipurpose room, market place, circulation workroom, meeting room, Friends of the Library workroom, staff workroom, restrooms, children's library, and early childhood area. The second floor would include a staff workroom, staff lounge, staff restrooms, two study rooms, public restrooms, adult collections, MND i February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects and a teen room. The new library would be designed to achieve a U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) rating of Gold. Phase 2 Phase 2 of the Proposed Project includes the renovation of the existing 8,740 SF Donald Dungan Library to be repurposed as the new NCC. The renovation includes minor floor area expansion totaling approximately 600 SF to include a new catering kitchen, new exterior glazing and entrance doors, new mechanical equipment, electrical panels, new lighting, and audio visual/information technology equipment and infrastructure. The renovation also includes a new walled loading/delivery area to serve the facility, site landscaping immediately surrounding the building, and a new slurry coat finish and restriping of the Park Avenue surface parking lot located at the front of the building. The renovated building would be designed to achieve a USGBC LEED rating of Silver. Public Review Period: February 13, 2017 to March 4, 2017 Mitigation Measures Incorporated into the Project to Avoid Significant Effects: Biological Resources B-1: If construction activities occur within the bird breeding season (February 1St — August 31St), then the City (or its contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre - construction nesting bird survey no more than 30 days prior to the start of construction. The nest survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by Project activities such as noise, human activity, dust, etc. If active bird nests are found on or immediately adjacent to the Project site, then the qualified biologist will establish an appropriate buffer zone around the active nests, typically a 250 -foot radius for songbirds and a 500 -foot radius for raptors. Project activities shall be avoided within the buffer zone until the nest is deemed no longer active by the biologist. Weekly nesting surveys and biological monitoring may be necessary if nesting birds are found on the Project site. B-2: In order to avoid and minimize the potential impact to parkway trees, fencing, guarding or framing should be placed within a 5 -foot minimum distance of the tree trunk of protected trees within and adjacent to the limits of disturbance such that no work shall occur within the protected area. This would provide a full avoidance of direct impacts to trees protected under the City's municipal code. During construction the contractor shall provide sufficient water to preserve the trees and for overall health of the trees. If this is unfeasible because work cannot be avoided within the protected zone, a permit or exemption shall be obtained from the City's Public Services Department, Maintenance Division. Trees removed under a permit will be replaced at a ratio up to 3:1. The City will comply with the Street Tree Master Plan and all City codes on the landscaping of the Proposed Project. Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of grading permits, submit for review and approval a Construction Management Plan. This plan features methods to minimize disruption to the neighboring uses to the fullest extent that is reasonable and practicable. The plan shall include construction parking and vehicle access and specifying staging areas and delivery and MND ii February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects hauling truck routes. The plan should mitigate disruption during construction. The truck route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas and major truck traffic during peak hours. The total truck trips to the site shall not exceed 200 trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus 100 truck trips from the site) unless approved by the Development Services Director or Transportation Services Manager. MND iii February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MND iv February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects CONTENTS Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration - Lions Park Projects ............................................ 1 Mitigation Measures Incorporated into the Project to Avoid Significant Effects .............. 2 Section1. Background..................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Summary .....................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Introduction.................................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Surrounding Land Uses/Environmental Setting...............................................................1-1 Section2. Project Description.......................................................................................2-1 2.1 Project Characteristics..................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Project Timing..............................................................................................................2-2 2.5 Regulatory Requirements, Permits, and Approvals........................................................2-17 2.6 Consultation With California Native American Tribe(s)...................................................2-17 Section 3. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected and Determination ...................3-1 Section4. Environmental Checklist and Discussion......................................................4-1 4.1 Aesthetics....................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources................................................................................4-2 4.3 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................4-4 4.4 Biological Resources...................................................................................................4-10 4.5 Cultural Resources......................................................................................................4-14 4.6 Geology and Soils.......................................................................................................4-16 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions..........................................................................................4-19 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials................................................................................4-22 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................4-25 4.10 Land Use and Planning...............................................................................................4-29 4.11 Mineral Resources......................................................................................................4-30 4.12 Noise......................................................................................................................... 4-31 4.13 Population and Housing..............................................................................................4-33 4.14 Public Services...........................................................................................................4-34 4.15 Recreation.................................................................................................................4-36 4.16 Transportation/Traffic.................................................................................................4-36 4.17 Tribal Cultural Resources............................................................................................4-38 4.18 Utilities and Service Systems.......................................................................................4-43 4.19 Mandatory Findings of Significance..............................................................................4-46 SectionS. List of Preparers........................................................................................... 5-1 Section6. Bibliography.................................................................................................6-1 Section7. List of Appendices........................................................................................ 7-1 Appendix A - Air Quality/Climate Change Technical Report Appendix B - Hydrology Study Appendix C - Water Quality Management Plan Contents 1-1 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1. Surrounding Land Uses.......................................................................................... 1-2 Table 4.3-1 Construction Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions for Phase 1 ..................... 4-6 y .,,.0 Table 4.3-2 Construction Related Reninnni Criteria Pollutant Emissions for Pse 2 ..................... ha 4-7 Table 4.3-3 Operational Criteria Pollutant Regional Air Emissions for Phases 1 and 2 ................... 4-7 Table 4.3-4 Operational Criteria Pollutant Regional Air Emissions for Phases 1 and 2 ................... 4-8 Table 4.3-5 Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptor for Phases 1 and 2 ................. 4-9 Table 4.7-1 Project Related GHG Emissions for Phases 1 and 2 ................................................4-20 Table 4.7-2 CARB Scoping Plan Measures and Proposed Project Comparison.............................4-21 Table 4.10-1. Surrounding Zoning and Land use Designations..................................................4-29 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1. Project Vicinity ........................................................................................................ 1-3 Figure 2. Project Location...................................................................................................... 1-5 Figure3. Site Plan — Phase 1................................................................................................. 2-3 Figure4. Site Plan — Phase 2................................................................................................. 2-5 Figure5. Cafe Elevations....................................................................................................... 2-7 Figure 6a. New Library Elevations (North and East).................................................................. 2-9 Figure 6b. New Library Elevations (South and West)...............................................................2-11 Figure 7a. New Neighborhood Community Center Elevations (North and East) ...........................2-13 Figure 7b. New Neighborhood Community Center Elevations (South and West) .........................2-15 Contents 1-2 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AB Assembly Bill AQMP Air Quality Management Plan ATP Active Transportation Plan BMPs Best Management Practices Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CDC California Department of Conservation CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife's CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CMSD Costa Mesa Sanitary District CNDDB Natural Diversity Database CNPS California Native Plant Society's CO carbon monoxide CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent CWA Clean Water Act DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control's EIR Environmental Impact Report FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GHG greenhouse gas LEED Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design LF linear feet LUST leaking underground storage tank MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MLD most likely descendants MND Mitigated Negative Declaration MWD Mesa Water District NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NCC Neighborhood Community Center NCCP/HC Coastal Subregion Natural Community Conservation Plan/ Habitat Conservation Plan ND Negative Declaration NO2 nitrogen dioxide NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service PMI0 particulate matter of 10 microns or less in diameter PM2.5 particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less in diameter PRC Public Resources Code RCP&G Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCIC South Central Coastal Archaeological Information Center SF square feet S02 sulfur dioxide SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board's TPH total petroleum hydrocarbons USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGBC U.S. Green Building Council Contents 1-3 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects VOCs Volatile organic compounds VOCs volatile organic compounds WQMP Water Quality Management Plan Contents 1-4 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects SECTION 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 Summary Project Title: Lead Agency Name and Address: Contact Person and Phone Number: Project Location: General Plan Designation: Zoning: 1.2 Introduction Lions Park Projects (Master Plan PA -16-71) City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, California 82626 Mel Lee, AICP Senior Planner (714)754-5611 mel.lee0)costamesaca.gov Lions Park 570 West 18th Street, 1845 and 1855 Park Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92627 Public/Institutional I&R — Institutional and Recreational The City of Costa Mesa is the Lead Agency for this Initial Study. The Initial Study has been prepared to identify and assess the anticipated environmental impacts of the Lions Park Projects (Proposed Project). This document has been prepared to satisfy the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code, Section 21000 et seq.) and State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 etseq.). CEQA requires that all state and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences of Projects over which they have discretionary authority before acting on those Projects. A CEQA Initial Study is generally used to determine which CEQA document is appropriate for a Project (Negative Declaration [ND], Mitigated Negative Declaration [MND], or Environmental Impact Report [EIR]). 1.3 Surrounding Land Uses/Environmental Setting The project site is located at Lions Park, 570 West 18th Street, 1845 and 1855 Park Avenue, Costa Mesa, California 92627 (Figure 1). Lions Park is bound by Plummer Street and the Park Center Place Apartments to the north, Park Avenue to the east, West 18th Street to the south, and Anaheim Avenue to the west. Lions Park measures approximately 12.8 acres. The park includes Davis Field, Costa Mesa Historical Society, Downtown Recreation Center, Downtown Aquatic Center, Neighborhood Community Center (NCC), Costa Mesa Donald Dungan Library, and Fire Station 3. The project site does not encompass all of Lions Park; only a portion which includes the Donald Dungan Library, the NCC building, a portion of parkland just south of the existing NCC, and the area between the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and Anaheim Avenue (Figure 2). Lions Park is surrounded by residential and commercial land uses, which are described in detail in Table 1-1. Background 1-1 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects Table 1-1. Surrounding Land Uses Notes. du/ac = dwelling unit per acre Source: Costa Mesa 2016 Background 1-2 February 2017 General Plan Designation Existing Land Use Project Site Public/Institutional Parkland North High Density Residential 20 du/ac Multi -family residential East Commercial Center, High Density Residential 20 du/ac Commercial/Retail, Multi -family residential South Low Density Residential (8 du/ac), Medium Density Residential 12 du/ac Single family residential West High Density Residential 20 du/ac Multi -family and single family residential Notes. du/ac = dwelling unit per acre Source: Costa Mesa 2016 Background 1-2 February 2017 Los Angeles "ima Tu'un a © Angeles 'O 1 9 g t Sun array National I Rano Alt adena Forest m rtSr Carson city Sacramento + Nor ollywd d ° Monrovia "I Burli�ap1� -- o Glendora Sabalalana �f 1Ht118 Azusa o ClareP �tft Francisco 'Sag Jose studlb city lPasadena /~" Q-efner>v = Fresno Las Vegas ,� �Iherfb Templ�City Covin o Upland° �. ra O Bakersfield R } o �t �r t� o 0 :��o ° _� >O�larrcl oBeverl i11s� �`Roserl�eadr +•`� y L.✓', O o O P 's c i t i c Los Artgel , •�uttttaL viceNn to Ana onterey Pe� ° o .PSOCpOna—_ LongOea ., ' �La°OPuente D' mon r Chin San °Culver , `IGloitt elloo O ° O o , - O untington 'ark Pi o }ivera j Hacienda oRo land 'no Hills"'' ills ' Riverside Lenno 0 o Bell #° ttier° HeightsIghts ° Q o.0 0 > o /f ��°_,. odo .. r eeyN\ La Habra�A4. �°Brea C ._. + - fL� ° o �(O oLa M a o orba Lind OFOnB o ° _ Ba��Wek _ C tr#os Placentia_ ✓" A Manhatti Berc`h'"7f B ane,ti,� O �� o� `' �' Riverside Redondo�e�a� L�ewood0 ,ParkO�� U i��ert011' ., County o b'carsion_ cyp 'so Anaheim • Wesarson �a=_=� Stanton ���0,1� Tustin' Cleveland �l Harbor City }}0__�.1; t�­­ -a Foot'h�ijis O t it ington O'� �� ! �� National Rancho ��-!' estminster 6� ! TuAin� --.* Palos 0 'an -Pedro r Forest �� Santa'Ana - Lake Eljnore Verdes Huntington fM Costlrvine SEI Toro `O BeaCho Me' rancho alta orrabuco ~Lke Margariatr Canyon Newport Beach o � Ora . g e F o �rest� �Missiog Viejo San C o u t ' Aliso ViL*jo�°L juna ills E Pedro ° Channel aguna Niguel E Project Location, oDana Point "an Clemente San Diego ` County s_ '.,. camp Pendleton ' Winn, Corps \� Base o \' o 1\ a o Oceanside , o 0 Carlsd o e � Miles z 0 5 10 x Map Date: 2/2/2017 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA 1?(•ORP Consulting, Im. Figure 1. Project Vicinity 2017-011.001 Lions Park Projects Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Background 1-4 February 2017 j 'Legend Approximate Project Boundary Feet ter` • � ,� It IJ _' 250 77. mom 00_ Tw. ' s _ ���.M AL t "^fins.' rLw.... 1w-4 v < . . wr vw. ••w` ,... ' wpm Mai r } 11114 - V. { • r< ' ,_ �{ .'tl,��#` "..ri�iS#it, . ';:"i....�1 a �� � .��'!�{��!•��►tNa� .i t wow- 999 M 1 r r s r-""' • r t 3 ` � 1 F' '1 i •ill. ..iYs #�,�' ry t •x $� � I f 'l r•� s Y s 55 !' • �� w f a' " i F} • f �,' • , moi. ski A Los 'M 11111, Nk .: • - h + ` ,i + f' . w • •',�°o'�, .� • !.. � #_ � .,? • �'` �' • `` .�;.'�` �' � ms's Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Background 1-6 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects SECTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Characteristics The Lions Park Projects (Proposed Project) would be completed in two successive construction phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2). Project components include: 1. Improvements to Lions Park, including building signs and directional/wayfinding signs (Phase 1) 2. Demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) and construction of a new library building and cafe (Phase 1) 3. Renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library building to be repurposed as the new Neighborhood Community Center (NCC) (Phase 2) Site plans for Phases 1 and 2 are shown on Figures 3 and 4, respectively, and discussed in greater detail below. Phase 1 The improvements to Lions Park include the demolition of the existing NCC, construction of a new cafe (snack and beverage kiosk), a new surface parking lot, and off-site street improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues, and building signs and directional/wayfinding signs. The existing NCC would be demolished to make room for the new library and to increase park open space by approximately one acre. The cafe would measure approximately 890 square feet (SF) and would serve the park and all facilities in the park. Elevations depicting the new cafe are shown on Figure 5. The new surface parking lot would be located in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and provide approximately 20 new parking spaces. This new parking lot would be accessed from Anaheim Avenue. Off-site street improvements include improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues. Improvements are detailed below: Park Avenue improvements include new sidewalks, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, street trees, street furnishings, and approximately 29 new parking spaces. These improvements would affect approximately 580 linear feet (LF) of street frontage and 17,430 SF in area. • Anaheim Avenue improvements include new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, and street trees. These improvements would affect approximately 145 LF of street frontage and 2,350 SF in area. Phase 1 of the Proposed Project also includes the construction of a new two-story 22,860 SF library to be built just south of the existing NCC building. The first floor would include a multipurpose room, market place, circulation workroom, meeting room, Friends of the Library workroom, staff workroom, restrooms, children's library, and early childhood area. The second floor would include a staff workroom, staff lounge, staff restrooms, two study rooms, public restrooms, adult collections, and a teen room. Elevations depicting the new library are shown on Figures 6a and 6b. The new Project Description 2-1 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects library would be designed to achieve a U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) rating of Gold. Phase 2 Phase 2 of the Proposed Project includes the renovation of the existing 8,740 SF Donald Dungan Library to be repurposed as the new NCC. The renovation includes minor floor area expansion totaling approximately 600 SF to include a new catering kitchen, new exterior glazing and entrance doors, new mechanical equipment, electrical panels, new lighting, and audio visual/information technology equipment and infrastructure. The renovation also includes a new walled loading/delivery area to serve the facility, site landscaping immediately surrounding the building, and a new slurry coat finish and restriping of the Park Avenue surface parking lot located at the front of the building. Elevations depicting the new NCC are shown on Figures 7a and 7b. The renovated building would be designed to achieve a USGBC LEED rating of Silver. 2.2 Project Timing Phase 1 construction is anticipated to begin in July 2017 and end December 2018. Phase 2 construction is anticipated to begin February 2019 and end February 2020. Project Description 2-2 February 2017 Map Date: 1/27/2017 Source: Johnson Favaro Architects 2016 ECORP Consulting. Inc. 41�t b- I ,, 1 i., , , ". V I � 1 I , I , ""! 1 Figure 3. Phase 1 Site Plan 2017-011.001 Lions Park Prgjects r. LEED Protect Rountlary NenL°ntlguouz Parcel col requirements for non Miguous FRo�Ecr +�� 'f �'^' �}- '= T parcah are mel periM1e MPR BupplemenUl Guitlance. 1. TM1e area separatlng tae Iwo parceh is —d by separate .. LEED LIBRARY PHASE BOUNDARY ANAFIFINI AVF lI entity Man Me iry °f Costa Mesa, C wM1icM1 owns Me Library and subsequent Wrking kt wi bMTs WIUIN. 19' I°.. 1..�,., ---__—^— ~1 Eo-dtl 2. TM1e parking kt parcel dr dy P, l b The I supports ry b.0- park"' - .11, —9 K. .1Ift I.IINN lM1 ro ry m e: sting pas ry So gI N zuppoa M1e occupanh to iM1e THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS jIII, I LEED LIBRARY PHASE BOUNDARY 3.As shown on ma sse den Iwo parcels are less Man 1/4 Rik d°T.,. b P°tl safe-Ik1ng be M pa has shown 9 iM ARCHITECT SITE AREA BREAKDOWN -yl LIBRARY PHASE - E. IF ey9 n OMPRs penq - Ra Ptea RON —LOIN. FOOTPRINT I NEW DONALD DUNGAN LIBRARY...................and IMPERVIOUS 115Ba S0 FT LEED LIBRARY PHASE BOUNDARY j NONCONTGWUs r tlaa common regulatory jur zd'chon are owned ane managed by 1. C of M IF,, Mesa 7. Tne weieM Isom nae prn'weaa nartativb- tM1is site p.n Ta se e.amr..c�s'�ew° na„�°ss•,rm , CONSULTNG ENGINEERS WALKWAYS AND PLAZ ..................................79.13] SO FT LAND PARCEL. LESS THAN PERVIOUS TM MILE FROM MAJORITY OF I LIBRARY PHA BE LEED VEGETATED .........................................................39511 SO FT '1 BOUNDARY :01Y -e” � t tlemonsirak compliance wilK iM1e requirements above. NON-VEGETATED............_..................................210]980 FT NON C ONTGUOuBLAND PARCELS - PHASE SURFACE PATHWAY FROM S l j ! ' _._ LOT PARKING ............................ .... LOT PA TOTAL PHASE AREA. LEGEND ...... _14147 80 FT 15167180 FT LOT TO LIBRARY I PARK . ^ — -_— 4 _ _J i_ CARPOOL 121 NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINTW EMISSION VEHICLES (1) 1 ARP. - USED LIBR PHASE i� PHASELEEDSOUNDARY REAR N ' ONCONIIGUOUS +i BOUNNDDARY BOUNDARY USED LIBRARY PHASE BOUNDARY 1; � � 1i, . PATHWAY PARKING LEED LIBRARY PHARE BOUNDARY 1� �-' nacn recrs eexs v7nrna TOTAL BITE RNING: 160 TOTAL CARPOOL PARKING I111. 16 f � TOTAL LOW EMMISSIONVEHICLE PARKING14 _ ttt LEED LIBRARY PHASE BOUNDARY ViJ LEED LIBRARY 7.—...�® k i PHASE BOUNDARY USED LIBRARY PHARE BOUNDARY cin AFvOovAts y _ _.. _ .... . NEW 3 LOOP BIKEE RACKB DRAFT - _ -LOWEMSSON t _---'� j -VEHICLE815>� NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION t '•—�-1 ,_y r CARPOOL 121 — LEEDLIBPAPVPHASE BOUNDARY NO SMOKING SIGN AT ENTRY '�- K-OFFMATTATENTRY { '' i ( a ' I w MAI ..__ '... u IL oo a. s ow suer" AL Date ssuesons f, N I SMOKING SI ENTRY PHARE BOUNDARY _ C —., e -» s EED t R _ E PLAN - LEED SITE PHASE 1 CARPOOL(4)� f NEW] LOOP BIKE RACKS -� L —��'''L1L, EIEMI85 LOW EM BBON�� CLES (2) VE—LES tel DARPooL1z mak._ ,-__— --- PARK AV£ PARKwiDt1 „< s °. ...� e<em _1 LEE D LIBRARY PHASE BOUNDARY 1S G LEED LIBRARY PHARE BOUNDARY �N A1.18 A1.18 -LEED SITE PLAN -LIBRARY PHASE SCAL E Al 1 BIM , Map Date: 1/27/2017 Source: Johnson Favaro Architects 2016 ECORP Consulting. Inc. 41�t b- I ,, 1 i., , , ". V I � 1 I , I , ""! 1 Figure 3. Phase 1 Site Plan 2017-011.001 Lions Park Prgjects LTOZ tipnaga-i t -Z uoilduasa4 Pa[ad )INVIS 1331 Allt/NOI1N31NI 39dd SIHl SP@LOad Jed suOII uoljeaelDaa @AI4260N palebil!W 14eaa pue ApnjS IelgluI LiOZ Ajenjga-4 8-Z uoildiaasad :Pafoad )INVIS 1331 AIIVNOIIN31NI 39Vd SIHI sPatoad �jed suOil u014eaejDaa ani4e6@N pale5l4!W :Ueaa pue Apn4S lepul Map Vate: 1/ZIIZU71 Source: Johnson Favaro Architects 2016 k .m -1 ECORP Consulting, Inc. Figure 6a. New Library Elevations 2017-011.001 Lions Park Ph2 ects 4 •' - _ o tJ KEYNOTES Key Valve TILE WAINRICE GI—I G FRWEON GWZING. AMECLIPLESS WI CPIDERCLIPAND NTILEVEREO FIN SUNPNOOR EFIR_ ION GLAZING, BUTT ELESS SHAME OFVAULTTO SMAPNE OF VAULT vKo�Ecr ..„. THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS 5 E%TE IORGLAZING, FRAMELESS FR-1L11S TRO 5 raowEi FlNisn BLASTER A p U FAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS CML NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1 hNOT I Ii i DRAFT - FOR CO NSTRUCTION LIBRARY ELEVATIONS (RENDERED) A5.11A CML EAST ELEVATION SCALE 2 HIM Map Vate: 1/ZIIZU71 Source: Johnson Favaro Architects 2016 k .m -1 ECORP Consulting, Inc. Figure 6a. New Library Elevations 2017-011.001 Lions Park Ph2 ects LIOZ Ajenaga=j OT -Z uoildiaasaa Pa[oad HNdl9 1331 AIIHNOI1N31NI 39dd SIHI S:Paioad �aed SUOII u014eae1Daa anRe5aN pa4ebl4!W 4eaa pue Apn4S Ie14luI KEYNOTES Ney Vale Keynele Teat TILE WAINSCOTING 2 EXTERIOR GLAZING, BUTT ­NT. F-ELESS EXTERIOR GLAZING, BUTTJOINT. FRAMELESS, CUT TO •�. 1kj' ..4 SHAPEOFVAULT 14 GA. WALL CAP, EE STRUCTURAL OETAILS PT -T SMOOTH TROWEL FlNISH CML SOUTH ELEVATION I SC-1 CML WEST ELEVATION I SCALP THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS ARCITECTt�ffis N CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAFTS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LIBRARY ELEVATIONS (RENDERED) A5.12A B Map Date: 1/27/2017 Source: Johnson Favaro Architects 2016 Figure 6b. New Library Elevations ECORP Consi4ltin�;. Inc. 1 , . _ I 1t - '. v l I `'. r =v 1 1 "'.1,1 1.1 v ", : ; 2017-011.001 Lions Park Pli Jects LTOZ tienaga-I ZT-Z uoiTduasad :Pa[ad )INVIS 1331 AIIVNOIIN31NI 39dd SIHI sPaL0ad �aed suoil u01jeaeIDaa ani4e6aN pa4ebgW )}ea(] pue ApnjS leiliuI Map Date: 1/27/2017 Source: Johnson Favaro Architects 2016 ECORP Consulting, Inc. Figure 7a. New Neighborhood Community Center Elevations 2017-011.001 Lions Park Pro, jects OTHE O O p Fa .• NS PARK PROJECTS NORTHNCC • RENDER O O O O O ONOT .,� 4,g O y-,�.'//'�/''� i'� i � � �' x �e e � 4> . `\\� ��.--, ., + cam*• O ID--\AV N NT " DRAFT FOR CONSTRUCTION Map Date: 1/27/2017 Source: Johnson Favaro Architects 2016 ECORP Consulting, Inc. Figure 7a. New Neighborhood Community Center Elevations 2017-011.001 Lions Park Pro, jects LTOZ tipnaga-4 bT-Z uoiTdiaosaa :Pa[oad HNVl9 1331 A1IVNOI1N31NI 39Vd SIHl s:PaL0ad �A2d SUOII u014eaeIDaa anile6aN p@4ebgW :}eaa pue Apn4S leiliuI Man rata Source: Johnson Favaro Architects 2016 E;CORF Consultins; Inc. I� t �, i; , I• � Figure 7b. New Neighborhood Community Center Elevations 2017-011.001 Lions Park Projects •� "• . T • .lrlr?Il;'�.i-i'.•i�y. - L wC l,. •- - _ 'A" .`'.. 4, • '^�'� f� S. � RnwECT THE LIONS PARK PROJECTS KEYNOTES Key Value MTJ, METAL O IFING T. ITIF 3 INTERIOR GLAZING. pINT', FRAMELESS J TL-S EXTEROR BOF IC VAOD TILE ROFORM-EXIS NCC TOCREMAN EXIST T 5 NCC CMONCRETE RING GIRDER-EXIST NEWGLASS SKYLIGHT TO RE-E EXISTING SKYLIGHT ] NCC EXIGTING ONCRETE WALL ARCHITECT RUN 9 CONSULTING ENGINEERS NCC SOUTH ELEVATION RENDERscALE AR-11-sI-NEERE-.1 ... •' `; . C. �I) ly mw- Lft— �i A11111 I DRAFT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �Mluueuem nn o6ateSuivi NCC ELEVATIONNIEWS (RENDERED) A4.2.12A NCC WEST ELEVATION RENDER scALe 2 BIM Man rata Source: Johnson Favaro Architects 2016 E;CORF Consultins; Inc. I� t �, i; , I• � Figure 7b. New Neighborhood Community Center Elevations 2017-011.001 Lions Park Projects LTOZ Aienagaj 9T -Z uoildia:)saa :Pafoad )INVIS 1A31 AIIVNOIIN31NI 39dd SIHl S:Paioad �Aed SUOII u014MJDaa anl4eb@N pa4ebij!W :geaa pue Apn4S Iei4!uI Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects 2.5 Regulatory Requirements, Permits, and Approvals The following approvals and regulatory permits would be required for implementation of the Proposed Project: • City of Costa Mesa — Master Plan approval (Project No. is Planning Application PA -16-71) o The Master Plan requires discretionary approval by the Planning Commission, Parks Commission, and City Council. — Encroachment permit for work in the public right-of-way • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit for construction activity (Order 98-08 DWQ) 2.6 Consultation With California Native American Tribe(s) The following California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area have been notified of the Proposed Project: Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation David Belardes, Chairperson Joyce Perry, Representing Tribal Chair 32161 Avenida Los Amigos 4955 Paseo Segovia San Juan Capo, CA 92675 Irvine, CA 92612 Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Sonia Johnston, Tribal Chairperson P.O. Box 25628 Santa Ana, CA 92799 Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation Anthony Rivera, Chairman 31411-A La Matanza St. San Juan Capo, CA 92675-2674 Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians Anthony Morales, Chairperson P.O. Box 693 San Gabriel , CA 91778 Gabrieleno Tongva Nation Sam Dunlap, Chairperson P.O. Box 86908 LA, CA 90086 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Joseph Ontiveros P.O. Box 487 San Jacinto, CA 92581 Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Alfred Cruz, Cultural Resources Crdntr. P.O. Box 25628 Santa Ana, CA 92799 Gabriel i no-Tongva Tribe Linda Candelaria, Chairwoman 1875 Century Pk East, # 1500 LA, CA 90067 Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians Andrew Salas, Chairperson P.O. Box 393 Covina, CA 91723 Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians Kizh Nation Andrew Salas, Chairperson P.O. Box 393 Covina, CA 91723 Michael Mirelez Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians P.O. Box 1160 Thermal, CA 92274 Project Description 2-17 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects Gabrielino/ Tongva Nation Garielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council Sandonne Goad, Chairperson Attn: Robert F. Dorame, Tribal Chair 106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St., #231 P.O. Box 490 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Bellflower, CA 90707 A summary of the consultation process is provided in Section 4.17 of this Initial Study. Project Description 2-18 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED AND DETERMINATION Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Hazards/Hazardous Materials ❑ Recreation ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Air Quality ❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ Geology and Soils ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Public Services Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been ❑ addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as descrihed on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the Project cold have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier I_IR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the Project, nothing further is required. Mel Lee, AICP Date Senior Planner City of Costa Mesa Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 3-! February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 3-2 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects SECTION 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Aesthetics 4.1.1 Environmental Setting The Proposed Project would be located at Lions Park. Lions Park is located in a developed area of the City of Costa Mesa surrounded by residential and commercial land uses. Lions Park measures approximately 12.8 acres and includes Davis Field, the Costa Mesa Historical Society building, the Downtown Recreation Center, the Downtown Aquatic Center, the NCC building, Costa Mesa Donald Dungan Library, and Fire Station 3. 4.1.2 Aesthetics (I.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project have a substantial adverse Less than Less than effect on a scenic vista? Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ Scenic vistas in the City of Costa Mesa are limited to large areas of undeveloped land that offer views of scenic resources such as Upper Newport Bay, the Santa Ana River, Santa Ana Mountains, or the Pacific Ocean. The Proposed Project would be located within Lions Park which is located in an urbanized setting surrounded by commercial and residential land uses. The project area does not contain scenic viewpoints; therefore, the Proposed Project would not affect scenic vistas. No impacts would occur. b) Would the project substantially damage Less than scenic resources, including, but not limited Potentially Significant Less than to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Potentially Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The project site is not located within a state scenic highway (Caltrans 2017). No impact would occur. c) Would the project substantially degrade the Less than visual character or quality of the site existing q ty Potentially Significant with Less than and its surroundings? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project would be located at Lions Park. Lions Park is located in a developed area of the City surrounded by residential and commercial land uses. Lions Park measures approximately 12.8 acres and includes Davis Field, the Costa Mesa Historical Society building, the Downtown Recreation Center, the Downtown Aquatic Center, the NCC building, Costa Mesa Donald Dungan Library, and Fire Station 3. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-1 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects The Proposed Project would demolish the existing NCC building and construct a new library and cafe. The new library would be built just south the existing NCC building. The new library would have two stories and measure approximately 22,860 SF. The cafe would be built just east of the Downtown Aquatic Center and northwest of the new library. The cafe would measure approximately 890 SF. The existing Donald Dungan Library would be renovated and repurposed as the new NCC. The Proposed Project would also construct a new parking lot in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society building and street improvements along Park and Anaheim Avenues. No improvements or modifications are proposed to Davis Field, the Costa Mesa Historical Society building, the Downtown Recreation Center, the Downtown Aquatic Center, or Fire Station 3. The Proposed Project would not significantly change the visual character of the park. The Proposed Project would be consistent and compatible with the existing public facilities within the park and not degrade the existing visual character of the area. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project create a new source of Less than substantial light or glare, which would Significant adversely affect day or nighttime views in Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No the area? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project would include light fixtures for parking lots, pedestrian pathways, building entries, and landscaping. These light fixtures would provide increased visibility and highlight elements of buildings and trees. Light fixtures at the edge of the project site would be shielded and directed downward to avoid spillover effects on surrounding properties. Glare impacts from the proposed structures are not anticipated. The exterior of the new library would be composed of smooth finish plaster, tile, and glass. Architectural glass with low glare characteristics would be used to minimize glare impacts on surrounding properties. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 4.2.1 Environmental Setting The project site is located within an existing park designated as a Public/Institutional land use by the 2015-2035 City of Costa Mesa General Plan (City of Costa Mesa 2016a). The project site is located on Urban and Built -Up Land and not located on Prime Farmland nor is it under a Williamson Act Contract (CDC 2004; 2014). There are no local policies for agricultural resources that apply to the project site. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-2 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects 4.2.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources (11.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Less than Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Potentially Significant with Less than Importance (Farmland), as shown on the Significant Mitigation Significant No maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Impact Less than Impact Impact Mapping and Monitoring Program of the ❑ Significant ❑ California Resources Agency, to non- Potentially Significant with Mitigation Less than Significant No agricultural use? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The Proposed Project is not located within any farmland uses (City of Costa Mesa 2016a). The California Mapping and Monitoring Program, Important Farmlands Map for Orange County does not list the soils on the project site as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) (CDC 2014). Therefore, the Proposed Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use. No impact would occur. b) Would the project conflict with existing Less than zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Potentially Significant with Less than Act contract? Significant Mitigation Significant No 12220(8)), timberland (as defined by Public Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Resources Code section 4526), or timberland ❑ ❑ ❑ The project site is zoned as I&R — Institutional and Recreational and is not located in an agricultural use zone. According to the California Department of Conservation Williamson Act Parcels Map for Orange County, the project site is not subject to a Williamson Act contract (City of Costa Mesa 2015; CDC 2004). Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in a conflict with an agricultural zoning designation or a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(8)), timberland (as defined by Public Less than Resources Code section 4526), or timberland Significant zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? Potentially Significant Impact ❑ with Mitigation Incorporated ❑ Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ The project site is zoned as I&R — Institutional and Recreational by the City of Costa Mesa, and is not zoned for forest land, timberland, or timberland production (City of Costa Mesa 2015). The project site is currently developed and does not contain forestland or timberland. Surrounding areas are developed with commercial and residential uses. No impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-3 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects d) Would the project result in the loss of forest Less than land or conversion of forest land to non- Potentially Significant significant Less than Significant No location or nature, could result in conversion Potentially Potentia with Less than forest use? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact conversion of forest land to non -forest use? ❑ ❑ ❑ The project site is not zoned for forest land, timberland, or timberland production (City of Costa Mesa 2015). The project site is currently developed and does not contain forestland or timberland. Surrounding areas are developed with commercial and residential land uses. No impact would occur. e) Would the project involve other changes in Less than the existing environment, which, due to their Potentially Significant Less than Less than Significant No location or nature, could result in conversion Impact Significant Impact Impact of Farmland to non-agricultural use or Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The project site and the surrounding properties are not currently used for agriculture. The Proposed Project would not result in the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.3 Air Quality An Air Quality and Global Climate Change Impact Analysis Report was completed for the Proposed Project by Kunzman Associates, Inc. (Kunzman 2017). The findings of this report are summarized in the following sections and included as Appendix A. 4.3.1 Environmental Setting The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), and is within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAB has been designated by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as a nonattainment area for ozone, particulate matter of 10 microns or less in diameter (PMlo), and particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less in diameter (PM2.5)- Currently, the SCAB is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SOA and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) (Kunzman 2017). 4.3.2 Air Quality (III.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct Less than implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Potentially Significant Significant with Mitigation Less than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-4 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. Construction and operational emissions are discussed in the response to question b) of this section. Short term construction impacts and long term operation impacts were found to be below thresholds of significance. Therefore, the Proposed Project is not projected to contribute to the exceedance of any air pollutant concentration standards and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the first criterion. (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2010 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the Proposed Project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for the Proposed Project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCP&G) consists of three sections: Core Chapters, Ancillary Chapters, and Bridge Chapters. The Growth Management, Regional Mobility, Air Quality, Water Quality, and Hazardous Waste Management chapters constitute the Core Chapters of the document. These chapters currently respond directly to federal and state requirements placed on the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For the Proposed Project, the City of Costa Mesa General Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in the AQMP. The project site is currently designated as Public/Institutional in the General Plan Land Use Element. The Proposed Project is consistent with the current land use designation and would not require a General Plan amendment or zone change. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the current land use designation and is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site. As such, the Proposed Project is consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. The Proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. No impact would occur. b) Would the project violate any air quality Less than standard or contribute substantially to an Potentially Significant with Less than existing or projected air quality violation? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project's air quality impacts are attributable to construction and operation activities that have the potential to generate air emissions, toxic air contaminant emissions, and odor impacts. Air pollutant emissions for both the construction and operational phases of the Proposed Project were estimated using the CalEEMod program (Version 2016.3.1) (Kunzman 2017). Construction Impacts Emissions associated with construction would include the following: emissions of fugitive dust from surface disturbance activities, emissions of combustion pollutants from heavy construction Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-5 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects equipment, emissions of combustion pollutants from worker vehicles, and emissions of combustion pollutants from heavy-duty vehicles transporting construction materials and equipment to the site. Table 4.3-1 and 4.3-2 show estimated construction -related pollutant emissions for Phases 1 and 2 respectively. Table 4.3-1 Construction Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions for Phase 1 Activity VOC NOx Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) CO SO2 PMlo PM2.5 On-site Improvements Demolition On -Site 4.10 42.75 23.01 0.04 2.63 2.11 Off -Site 0.14 1.84 1.05 0.01 0.27 0.08 Total 4.24 44.58 24.06 0.04 2.90 2.19 Grading On -Site 3.07 33.89 17.10 0.03 4.19 2.93 Off -Site 0.09 0.25 0.70 0.00 0.18 0.05 Total 3.16 34.14 17.81 0.03 4.37 2.98 Building Construction On -Site 3.11 26.55 18.18 0.03 1.79 1.68 Off -Site 0.56 3.99 4.33 0.02 1.06 0.31 Total 3.67 30.54 22.51 0.04 2.85 1.99 Paving On -Site 1.51 14.52 12.43 0.02 0.84 0.77 Off -Site 0.10 0.07 0.79 0.00 0.23 0.06 Total 1.61 14.59 13.22 0.02 1.06 0.83 Architectural Coating On -Site 25.81 2.01 1.85 0.00 0.15 0.15 Off -Site 0.08 0.05 0.59 0.00 0.17 0.05 Total 25.89 2.06 2.44 0.00 0.32 0.20 Total of Overlapping Phases 31.17 47.18 38.17 0.07 4.23 3.02 SCA MD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No Off-site Improvements Site Preparation On -Site 0.85 10.51 4.35 0.01 0.68 0.46 Off -Site 0.03 0.02 0.22 0.00 0.06 0.02 Total 4.90 51.82 40.19 0.04 9.95 6.45 Paving On -Site 1.27 9.98 7.34 0.01 0.61 0.56 Off -Site 0.10 0.07 0.79 0.00 0.20 0.05 Total 2.81 20.35 15.39 0.02 1.26 1.08 Total of Overlapping Phases 33.98 67.54 53.56 0.09 5.50 4.10 SCA MD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No Source: Kunzman 2017 Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-6 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Protects Table 4.3-2 Construction Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions for Phase 2 Activity VOC NOx Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day) CO SO2 PM10 PM2.1 Grading Phase I Area Sources 0.58 On -Site 0.95 8.60 7.69 0.01 0.92 0.68 Off -Site 0.04 0.03 0.36 0.00 0.11 0.03 Total 0.99 8.63 8.05 0.01 1.03 0.71 Building Construction On -Site 0.96 9.82 7.54 0.01 0.61 0.56 Off -Site 0.08 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.21 0.06 Total 1.04 10.54 8.26 0.01 0.82 0.62 Paving On -Site 0.77 7.23 7.11 0.01 0.40 0.37 Off -Site 0.07 0.04 0.59 0.00 0.20 0.05 Total 0.84 7.27 7.70 0.01 0.60 0.42 Architectural Coating On -Site 3.26 1.68 1.83 0.00 0.11 0.11 Off -Site 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.03 0.01 Total 3.27 1.69 1.93 0.00 0.14 0.12 Total of Overlapping Phases 5.15 19.50 17.89 0.03 1.56 1.16 SCA MD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No Source: Kunzman 2017 As shown on Table 4.3-1 and 4.3-2, none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the Proposed Project. Operational Impacts The ongoing operation of the Proposed Project would result in a long-term air quality emissions. This increase would be mainly due to emissions from the project generated vehicle trips and through operational emissions from the ongoing use of the Proposed Project. The highest emissions from either summer or winter criteria pollutant emissions created from the Proposed Project's long-term operations have been calculated for Phase 1 and Phase 2 and are summarized below in Table 4.3-3. Table 4.3-3 also includes the total emissions for Phases 1 and 2 combined. Table 4.3-3 Operational Criteria Pollutant Regional Air Emissions for Phases 1 and 2 Activity VOC Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.1 Phase I Area Sources 0.58 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.01 0.13 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.01 Mobile Sources 1.08 4.24 12.89 0.04 3.53 0.98 Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-7 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects Activity VOC Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO SO2 PMlo PM2.1 Total Emissions 1.67 4.37 13.02 0.04 3.54 0.99 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact Phase 2 ❑ SCAQMD Operational ® ❑ Area Sources 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources 0.01 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.04 0.01 Total Emissions 0.04 0.04 0.14 0.00 0.04 0.01 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Total for Phases 1 and 2 1.71 4.41 13.15 0.04 3.59 1.00 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Source: Kunzman 2017 The data provided in Table 4.3-3 shows that none of the phases individually or combined would exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the Proposed Project. Furthermore, Table 4.3-4 shows that when maximum daily construction emissions (from the highest - emitting construction phases of Phase 2) are added to the unmitigated operational emissions of the completed Phase 1, the total emissions still meet SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the Proposed Project. Table 4.3-4 Operational Criteria Pollutant Regional Air Emissions for Phases 1 and 2 Activity Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day) considerable net increase of any criteria VOC NOx CO S02 PM PM2.1 Total for Phase 1 plus Less than state ambient air quality standard (including Significant 6.82 23.88 30.91 0.07 5.10 2.15 construction Phase 2 Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact ❑ SCAQMD Operational ® ❑ 55 55 550 150 150 55 Thresholds Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Source: Kunzman 2017 c) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or Less than state ambient air quality standard (including Significant releasing emissions which exceed quantitative Potentially with Less than thresholds for ozone precursors)? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-8 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects The project site is in an area considered a nonattainment area for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. As described in the response to question b) of this section, neither short-term construction of the Proposed Project nor long-term operation of the Proposed Project would exceed significance thresholds for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. Because the Proposed Project is not considered to result in a significant impact, the Proposed Project is not considered to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project expose sensitive receptors Less than PM2.5 to substantial pollutant concentrations? Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Construction Impacts The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are residential uses located approximately 47 feet from the western project boundary. Table 4.3-5 shows the onsite emissions from the CalEEMod model for the different construction activity and the emissions thresholds. Table 4.3-5 Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptor for Phases 1 and 2 Activity On -Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Phase 1 Demolition 42.75 23.01 2.63 2.11 Grading 33.89 17.10 4.19 2.93 Building Construction 26.55 18.18 1.79 1.68 Paving 14.52 12.43 0.84 0.77 Architectural Coating 2.01 1.85 0.15 0.15 SCA MD Threshold for 25 meters 82 feet 131 962 7 5 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Phase 2 Grading 8.60 7.69 0.92 0.68 Building Construction 9.82 7.54 0.61 0.56 Paving 7.23 7.11 0.40 0.37 Architectural Coating 1.68 1.83 0.11 0.11 SCA MD Threshold for 25 meters 82 feet 92 647 4 3 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Source: Kunzman 2017 The data provided in Table 4.3-5 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. Operational Impacts During operation, on-site emissions would be negligible and would primarily consist of the intermittent on-site travel of motor vehicles. Therefore, due the lack of stationary source emissions, no long-term localized significance threshold analysis is warranted. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-9 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects e) Would the project create objectionable odors Less than affecting a substantial number of people? Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact ❑ Incorporated ❑ Impact Impact ® ❑ Construction Impacts Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process are of short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor producing materials. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts of odor producing materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during construction of the Proposed Project. Diesel exhaust and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) would be emitted during construction of the Proposed Project, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the project site and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors. Impacts would be less than significant. Operational Impacts Potential sources that may emit odors during the ongoing operations of the Proposed Project would include odor emissions from diesel truck emissions and trash storage areas. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the project site and through compliance with SCAQMD's Rule 402, no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on-going operations of the Proposed Project. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.4 Biological Resources A biological resource assessment was completed to document the existing biological resources in the project area, to assess the habitat for its potential to support sensitive plant and wildlife species, and to determine whether implementation of the Proposed Project would impact sensitive biological resources, as required under CEQA. A biological reconnaissance survey was performed by ECORP Consulting, Inc. on January 18, 2017. Prior to conducting the biological reconnaissance survey, ECORP biologists performed a literature search using the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's (CDFW) Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), California Native Plant Society's (CNPS) Online Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants, as well as the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey to determine the special -status species, and sensitive habitats that have been documented in the project vicinity. Using this information and observations in the field, a list of special -status plant and animal species that may have the potential to occur within the project site was generated. The results of the biological reconnaissance survey are summarized below. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-10 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects 4.4.1 Environmental Setting Vegetation Communities The project site is currently composed of developed areas and ornamental landscaping. Plant species observed within these land cover types include ornamental trees and herbaceous plants. Ornamental vegetation includes eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.), pine (Pinus sp.), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Peruvian pepper tree (Schinus molle), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), Canary Island palm (Phoenix canariensis), oak (Quercus sp.), sycamore (Platanus sp.) rose (Rosa sp.), and agave (Agave spp.). Of the 11 plant species identified on the project site all are exotic species. Wildlife The project site provides habitat for species adapted to high levels of disturbance and urban environments. Eleven wildlife species were observed during the reconnaissance visit. Common species observed included house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), yellow-rumped warbler (Setophaga coronata), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), Brewer's blackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus), Cassin's kingbird (Tyrannus vociferans), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), lesser goldfinch (Spinus psaltria) and mountain chickadee (Poecile gambeli). A few gull species (Family Laridae) and a single turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) were observed flying high overhead. A single bird house was observed hanging from a tree in the park as a likely attractant for western bluebird (Sialia mexicana). Other common species expected to occur in and adjacent to the project site include house sparrow (Passer domesticus), common raven (Corvus corax), and Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna). Soils Soil types on the project site were determined using the NRCS Web Soil Survey. Soils within the project site consist mostly of Myford sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes with a small amount of Myford sandy loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes (NRCS 2017). Potential Waters of the U.S. The project site was examined to identify potential U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and CDFW jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1602 of the State of California Fish and Game Code. No hydrological features associated with a definable channel or wetland exist within or adjacent to the project site; therefore, no USACE or CDFW jurisdiction was identified. Special -Status Plants The literature search documented 36 special -status plant species (ten federally and/or state listed) in the project vicinity. All 36 species were presumed to be absent from the project site due to lack of habitat. Therefore, the biological reconnaissance survey did not include a focused survey for rare plants. Additionally, no special -status plant species were observed during the reconnaissance survey. Special -Status Wildlife The literature search documented 56 special -status wildlife species (15 federally and/or state -listed species) in the vicinity of the project site. All 56 species were presumed to be absent from the Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-11 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects project site due to lack of habitat. Therefore, the biological reconnaissance survey did not include a focused survey for special -status wildlife species. Additionally, no special -status wildlife species were observed during the reconnaissance survey. Wildlife Movement Corridors The project site is completely developed or landscaped and contains very little cover that would only allow for limited movement of smaller resident populations of wildlife. Furthermore, the entire project site is cut off from any large blocks of habitat that would allow the movement of wildlife species. Although the project site is within two miles of both the Talbert Regional Park and Upper Newport Bay Nature Preserve, there are no drainages or other features on the site which would serve as a connecting corridor to these areas. 4.4.2 Biological Resources (IV.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or Less than regulations, or by the California Department Significant of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Service? Impact Incorporated Impact Impa The project site is located in an urbanized area with parcels of land that are developed and support ornamental landscaping. No special -status species were observed on the project site including the 36 special -status plant species or 56 special -status wildlife species identified in the literature search. While no special -status wildlife or plant species were observed during the field surveys, there is a potential for the project area to support nesting birds in small patches of vegetation and structures on and adjacent to the project site. Nesting birds are protected under both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the California Fish and Game Code (Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3513, and 3800) and cannot be subjected to take (as defined in California Fish and Game Code) during the bird breeding season, which typically runs from February 15 through August 31. If construction of the Proposed Project occurs during the bird breeding season, ground -disturbing construction activities could indirectly affect native and nongame birds and their nests through increased noise disturbances. Impacts would be less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measure B-1. b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impz Sensitive habitats include those vegetation communities which are considered rare in the region, are considered sensitive by the State of California, and are listed as sensitive under local conservation Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-12 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Protects plans. The project site supports no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. No impact would occur. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Less than Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, Less than vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct Significant removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or Potentially Significant other means? Impact with Less than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impz No hydrological features associated with a definable channel or wetland exist within or adjacent to the project site; therefore, no USACE or CDFW jurisdiction was identified. No impact would occur. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with Less than established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of Potentially Significant native wildlife nursery sites? Impact Significant with Less than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impz The Proposed Project is not located near a native wildlife nursery site. The Proposed Project is located in an area characterized by public and residential uses and does not connect significant open spaces; therefore, it does not function as a major wildlife movement corridor. All native birds, including raptors, are protected under California Fish and Game Code and the Federal MBTA. As previously stated in the response to question a), prior to commencing ground disturbing activities during the nesting bird season Mitigation Measure B-1 shall be implemented to ensure that there are no impacts to nesting birds. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. e) Would the project conflict with any local Less than policies or ordinances protecting biological Significant resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Potentially Significant Impact ❑ with Mitigation Incorporated ® Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ Parkway trees protected under City Municipal Code Title 15, Chapter V are located throughout the project site. Direct and indirect impacts are likely to occur as part of the Proposed Project. Prior to commencing ground disturbing activities, Mitigation Measure B-2 shall be implemented to ensure that impacts to protected trees are minimized. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-13 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Less than Natural Community Conservation Plan, or Significant other approved local, regional, or state Potentially with Less than Significant habitat Mitigation Significant No conservation plan? Impact Incorporated Impact Impa The project site is not located within a Habitat Reserve System nor is the vegetation type designated a Covered Habitat as identified by the Central and Coastal Subregion Natural Community Conservation Plan/ Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) (County of Orange 1996). No impact would occur. Mitigation Measures B-1: If construction activities occur within the bird breeding season (February 1St — August 31St), then the City (or its contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre -construction nesting bird survey no more than 30 days prior to the start of construction. The nest survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by Project activities such as noise, human activity, dust, etc. If active bird nests are found on or immediately adjacent to the Project site, then the qualified biologist will establish an appropriate buffer zone around the active nests, typically a 250 -foot radius for songbirds and a 500 -foot radius for raptors. Project activities shall be avoided within the buffer zone until the nest is deemed no longer active by the biologist. Weekly nesting surveys and biological monitoring may be necessary if nesting birds are found on the Project site. B-2: In order to avoid and minimize the potential impact to parkway trees, fencing, guarding or framing should be placed within a 5 -foot minimum distance of the tree trunk of protected trees within and adjacent to the limits of disturbance such that no work shall occur within the protected area. This would provide a full avoidance of direct impacts to trees protected tinder the City's municipal code. During construction the contractor shall provide sufficient water to preserve the trees and for overall health of the trees. If this is unfeasible because work cannot be avoided within the protected zone, a permit or exemption shall be obtained from the City's Public Services Department, Maintenance Division. Trees removed under a permit will be replaced at a ratio up to 3:1. The City will comply with the Street Tree Master Plan and all City codes on the landscaping of the Proposed Project. 4.5 Cultural Resources A cultural resources survey was conducted by ECORP Consulting, Inc. in January 2017 for the Proposed Project. The purpose of the investigation was to identify cultural resources that could be affected by the Proposed Project. A paleontological records search was completed by the Vertebrate Paleontology Section of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-14 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects 4.5.1 Environmental Setting Cultural Resources The analysis of cultural resources was based on a records search and field survey. The records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Archaeological Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System at California State University, Fullerton on January 26, 2017. The field survey was conducted January 31, 2017. The records search included the results of previous surveys within a 0.5 -mile (800 meters) radius of the Proposed Project location. Paleontological Resources A paleontological records search was completed by the Vertebrate Paleontology Section of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County on January 30, 2017. 4.5.2 Cultural Resources (V.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse Less than change in the significance of a historical 9 9 Potentially Significant with Less than resource as defined in §15064.5? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The cultural resources records search indicated that the project area has not been previously surveyed and that there are no previously recorded historical resources in the project area. Previously recorded resources within 0.5 -mile of the project area include two prehistoric shell middens, two trailer parks, a senior center, a commercial building, and a church. The field survey of unpaved areas in Lions Park conducted for the Proposed Project did not discover any prehistoric or historic -period resources on the project site. All buildings and structures on the Park property appear to be less than 50 years old based on architectural characteristics. No historical resources as defined in §15064.5 have been identified in Lions Park and no known historical resources would be adversely affected. However, there always remains a possibility that unrecorded cultural resources are present beneath the ground surface, and that such resources may be exposed during project construction. If previously unrecorded historical resources are encountered during construction all activities in the vicinity of the find would be suspended. The City of Costa Mesa would retain an archaeologist to recover, identify, document, and prepare the find for curation. Final disposition and location of the recovered materials shall be determined by the City of Costa Mesa. Impacts would be less than significant level. b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse Less than change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Potentially Significant Impact Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ No archaeological resources have recorded during the field survey. the project vicinity. Therefore, it beneath the ground surface and been previously recorded on the project area and none were However, prehistoric archaeological sites have been recorded in is possible that unrecorded cultural resources could be present , if present, may be exposed during project construction. As Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-15 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects previously stated in the response to question a), the City of Costa Mesa would retain an archaeologist to recover, identify, document, and prepare the find for curation. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project directly or indirectly Less than destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Potentially Significant Significant with Mitigation Less than Significant No dedicated cemeteries? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The paleontological records search completed by the Vertebrate Paleontology Section of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County indicated that shallow deposits in the project area consist of marine younger Quaternary Terrace deposits. These deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils. The marine younger Quaternary Terrace has a low potential to contain fossil resources. The marine younger Quaternary Terrace deposits overlie older Quaternary deposits in the subsurface which has high potential to contain significant vertebrate fossils. Fossils recovered from these sediments in the project vicinity include fossil horse, undetermined elephant (mammoth or mastodon), sea turtle (Cheioniidae), camel (Came/idae), and mammoth (Mammuthus sp.) bones. It is estimated that the older Quaternary deposits begin at a depth of about 10 feet below surface in the project area. If project excavation extends below 10 feet there is a potential for unknown buried paleontological resources to be affected. Therefore, the City of Costa Mesa would retain a qualified paleontologist to determine if the older Quaternary deposits are being disturbed. If so, the paleontologist would establish a monitoring program to recover any significant fossils that may be encountered. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project disturb any human Less than remains, including those interred outside of Potentially Significant with Less than dedicated cemeteries? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ No formal cemeteries are located in or near the project area and no human remains have been reported in the project vicinity, based on the records search from SCCIC. Therefore, the Proposed Project has little potential to disturb human remains. If potential human remains are encountered the Proposed Project would comply with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) and Assembly Bill (AB) 2641. The City of Costa Mesa would notify the Orange County Coroner and a qualified archaeologist to determine the next appropriate action. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.6 Geology and Soils A geotechnical investigation of the project site was conducted by Geotechnologies, Inc. to obtain soil and geologic data, and to provide preliminary design parameters and recommendations to the Proposed Project (Geotechnologies 2016). Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-16 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects 4.6.2 Geology and Soils (VI.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or Less than based on other substantial evidence of a Significant known fault? Refer to Division of Mines Potentially Significant with Mitigation Less than Significant No and Geology Special Publication 42. Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including Less than liquefaction? Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iv) Landslides? Less than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ i) According to the California Department of Conservation Newport Beach Quadrangle Map, the nearest Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone is located approximately 3.5 miles northwest of the project site (CDC 1986). Earthquake fault zones typically extend approximately 500 feet in width on either side of a major active fault trace and approximately 200 to 300 feet in width on either side of a well-defined minor active fault, as designated by the State. The City of Costa Mesa General Plan identifies the Indianapolis Fault adjacent to the project site (City of Costa Mesa 2016a). Just like most of southern California, in the event of an earthquake, strong ground shaking would occur. However, the Proposed Project would not increase the risk of exposing people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death due to the rupture of a known earthquake fault because the project area is already developed. Design of the Proposed Project would follow the recommendations of a registered civil, structural engineer and/or engineering geologist and at a minimum meet current building standards and codes including those associated with protection from anticipated seismic events. The project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo earthquake fault zone. Furthermore, ground rupture is not considered to be a constraint within the project area. Based on these considerations, the potential for surface ground rupture is considered low (Geotechnologies 2016). A less than significant impact would occur. iii) Just like most of southern California, in the event of an earthquake strong ground shaking is expected to occur on the project site. The Proposed Project would not expose people or structures to strong seismic ground shaking greater than what currently exists. Design and construction would Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-17 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects comply with current building codes and standards which would reduce the risk of loss, injury, or death resulting from strong ground shaking. Impacts would be less than significant. iii) Liquefaction is a phenomenon where water -saturated granular soil loses shear strength during strong ground shaking produced by earthquakes. The loss of soil strength occurs when cyclic pore water pressure increases below the groundwater surface. Potential hazards due to liquefaction include the loss of bearing strength beneath structures, possibly causing foundation failure and/or significant settlements. The project site is not located within the liquefaction potential zone as shown on the State of California Seismic Hazard Zone Map, for the Newport Beach Quadrangle (CDC 1997). Furthermore, the site specific geotechnical investigation conducted for the Proposed Project determined that the project site's soils would not be prone to liquefaction (Geotechnologies 2016). Impacts would be less than significant. iv) The project site is not located within the landslide potential zone as shown on the State of California Seismic Hazard Zone Map, for the Newport Beach Quadrangle (CDC 1998). Based on the results of the site-specific geotechnical investigation, the probability of seismically -induced landslides occurring on the site is considered low due to the general lack of elevation difference across or adjacent to the site (Geotechnologies 2016). Impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project result in substantial soil Less than erosion or the loss of topsoil? Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Implementation of the Proposed Project would require ground -disturbing activities, such as grading, that could potentially result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Construction of the Proposed Project would be required to comply with the Construction General Permit, either through a waiver or through preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Best Management Practices (BMPs) included in the SWPPP would minimize soil erosion during construction. The Proposed Project's grading plan and SWPPP would also ensure that the proposed earthwork and storm water structures are designed to avoid soil erosion. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, Less than and potentially result in on- or off-site Significant landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, Potentially with Less than liquefaction or collapse? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Strong ground shaking can cause settlement, lateral spreading, or subsidence by allowing sediment particles to become more tightly packed, thereby reducing pore space. The potential for a landslide, lateral spreading, liquefaction, or collapse at the project site is very low (Geotechnologies 2016). Furthermore, project structures would be designed taking into consideration the recommendations listed in the geotechnical investigation conducted for the Proposed Project by Geotechnologies, Inc. Impacts would be less than significant. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-18 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects d) Would the project be located on expansive Less than soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Significant Uniform Building Code (1994), creating Potentially Significant with Mitigation Less than Significant No substantial risks to life or property? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact disposal of waste water? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The project site contains approximately three feet of fill. According to the geotechnical report prepared for the Proposed Project, the onsite geologic materials in the upper five feet have very low expansion properties (Geotechnologies 2016). Project structures would be designed taking into consideration the recommendations listed in the geotechnical investigation conducted for the Proposed Project by Geotechnologies, Inc. Impacts would be less than significant. e) Would the project have soils incapable of Less than adequately supporting the use of septic tanks Less than or alternative waste water disposal systems Potentially Significant Significant Less than Significant No where sewers are not available for the Potentially Significant with Mitigation Less than Significant No disposal of waste water? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The Proposed Project does not include the installation of a septic system or alternative waste water disposal system. No impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 4.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (VII.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas Less than emissions, either directly or indirectly, that Significant may have a significant impact on the Potentially Significant with Mitigation Less than Significant No environment? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project is anticipated to generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste, water, and construction equipment. The CalEEMod Version 2016.3.1 was used to calculate the GHG emissions from the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project's year 2019 for Phase 1 and 2020 for Phase 2 (opening years) unmitigated emissions were calculated and compared to the SCAQMD Tier 3 draft screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (COZe) per year. Table 4.7-1 provides the estimated GHG emissions for the Proposed Project. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-19 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects Table 4.7-1 Project Related GHG Emissions for Phases 1 and 2 Category Bio-COZ Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) NonBio- CO2 CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e plan, policy or regulation adopted for the Significant Phase 1 purpose of reducing the emissions of Potentially with Area Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.00 92.38 92.38 0.00 0.00 92.77 Mobile Sources 0.00 614.25 614.25 0.03 0.00 614.96 Waste 2.16 0.00 2.16 0.13 0.00 5.36 Water 0.12 3.51 3.62 0.01 0.00 4.02 Construction 0.00 15.89 15.89 0.00 0.00 15.96 Total Emissions 2.28 726.03 728.31 0.17 0.00 733.07 SCAQMD Draft Screening Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No Phase 2 Area Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.00 6.82 6.82 0.00 0.00 6.85 Mobile Sources 0.00 14.61 14.61 0.00 0.00 14.63 Waste 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.00 0.63 Water 0.08 1.52 1.59 0.01 0.00 1.85 Construction 0.00 5.21 5.21 0.00 0.00 5.25 Total Emissions 0.33 28.16 28.49 0.03 0.00 29.20 SCAQMD Draft Screening Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No Phase 1 and 2 Total for Phase 1 and 2 SCAQMD Screening Threshold 762.28 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No JUUI t -C. NUI ILIII0II LU1/ As shown in Table 4.7-1, the Proposed Project's GHG emissions meet the SCAQMD screening threshold. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable Less than plan, policy or regulation adopted for the Significant purpose of reducing the emissions of Potentially with Less than greenhouse gases? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The City of Costa Mesa does not currently have a Climate Action Plan; therefore, GHG emissions have been compared to the CARB Scoping Plan. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-20 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects Scoping Plan The CARB Board approved a Climate Change Scoping Plan in December 2008. The Scoping Plan outlines the State's strategy to achieve the 2020 GHG emissions limit. The Scoping Plan "proposes a comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions in California, improve our environment, reduce our dependence on oil, diversify our energy sources, save energy, create new jobs, and enhance public health." This Scoping Plan calls for an "ambitious but achievable" reduction in California's GHG emissions, cutting approximately 30 percent from business as usual emission levels projected for 2020, or about 10 percent from today's levels. On a per -capita basis, that means reducing annual emissions of 14 tons of carbon dioxide for every man, woman, and child in California down to about 10 tons per person by 2020. Project consistency with applicable strategies in the Plan is assessed in Table 4.7-2. As shown in Table 4.7-2, the Proposed Project is consistent with the applicable strategies. Furthermore, as the Proposed Project's unmitigated emissions fall well below the Tier 3 SCAQMD draft screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons CO2e per year for all land uses, the Proposed Project would comply with applicable Green Building Standards and City of Costa Mesa's policies regarding sustainability (as dictated by the City's General Plan), and would achieve LEED certification, further analysis is not warranted. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. No impact would occur. Table 4.7-2 CARB Scoping Plan Measures and Proposed Project Comparison Scoping Plan Measures to Reduce Proposed Project Compliance with Measure Greenhouse Gas Emissions California Light -Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Consistent. These are GARB enforced standards; vehicles Standards — Implement adopted standards and that access the project that are required to comply with planned second phase of the program. Align zero- the standards will comply with the strategy. emission vehicle, alternative and renewable fuel and vehicle technology programs with long-term climate chane goals. Energy Efficiency— Maximize energy efficiency Consistent. The proposed library is to be LEED Gold building and appliance standards; pursue additional certified and the proposed NCC is to be LEED Silver efficiency including new technologies, policy, and certified. The Proposed Project would be compliant with implementation mechanisms. Pursue comparable the current Title 24 standards. investment in energy efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in California. Low Carbon Fuel Standard — Develop and adopt the Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles Low Carbon Fuel Standard. that access the Proposed Project that are required to comply with the standards would comply with the strategy. Vehicle Efficiency Measures — Implement light-duty Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles vehicle efficiency measures. that access the Proposed Project that are required to comply with the standards would comply with the strategy. Medium/Heavy-Duty Vehicles — Adopt medium and Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles heavy-duty vehicle efficiency measures. that access the Proposed Project that are required to comply with the standards will comply with the strategy. Green Building Strategy — Expand the use of green Consistent. The California Green Building Standards Code building practices to reduce the carbon footprint of (proposed Part 11, Title 24) was adopted as part of the California's new and existing inventory of buildings. California Building Standards Code in the CCR. Part 11 establishes voluntary standards that will become Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-21 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects Scoping Plan Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Proposed Project Compliance with Measure to the public or the environment through the mandatory in the 2010 edition of the Code, on planning Significant and design for sustainable site development, energy routine transport, use, or disposal of efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code with requirements), water conservation, material conservation, hazardous and internal air contaminants. The Proposed Project Mitigation would be subject to these mandatory standards. Further, materials? The proposed Library is to be LEED Gold certified and the Incorporated proposed NCC is to be LEED Silver certified. High Global Warming Potential Gases — Adopt Consistent. CARB identified five measures that reduce measures to reduce high global warming potential HFC emissions from vehicular and commercial gases. refrigeration systems; vehicles that access the Proposed Project that are required to comply with the measures _ would comply with the strategy. Recycling and Waste — Reduce methane emissions at Consistent. The state is currently developing a regulation landfills. Increase waste diversion, composting, and to reduce methane emissions from municipal solid waste commercial recycling. Move toward zero -waste. landfills. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with City programs, such as City's recycling and waste reduction program, which comply, with the 50 percent reduction required in AB 939. Water— Continue efficiency programs and use Consistent. The Proposed Project would comply with all cleaner energy sources to move and treat water. applicable City ordinances. Source: Kunzman 2017 Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 4.8.1 Hazards and Hazardous Materials (VIII.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project create a significant hazard Less than to the public or the environment through the Significant routine transport, use, or disposal of Potentially with Less than hazardous Significant Mitigation Significant No materials? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Some hazardous materials, such as diesel fuel, would be used by heavy equipment at the site during construction. No fueling or maintenance of equipment would occur on the site. The use of such materials would not create a significant hazard to the public and impacts would be less than significant. No hazardous materials would be used after the construction of the Proposed Project. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through Less than reasonably foreseeable upset and accident Significant conditions involving the release of hazardous Potentially with Less than materials into the environment? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-22 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects During construction some hazardous materials, such as diesel fuel, would be used. A SWPPP, listing BMPs to prevent construction pollutants and products from violating any water quality standard or waste discharge requirements, would be prepared for the Proposed Project. The release of any spills would be prevented through the implementation of BMPs listed in the SWPPP. The Proposed Project would continue an existing use; therefore, operation of the Proposed Project would result in similar hazard conditions as the existing conditions associated with the current NCC and Library. Daily operation of the new NCC and Library would not result in a new hazard to the public or the environment. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous Less than materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed Potentially Significant significant with Mitigation Less than Significant No school? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ There are no schools within one-quarter mile of the project site. The closest schools to the project site include St. Joachim, which is located approximately one mile to the northeast, and Whittier Elementary School, which is located approximately one mile to the west. Please see the response to question VIII. b) above. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Less than Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Potentially Significant Impact Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ A search of the Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and Substance List (Cortese List) and EnviroStor online database and the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) GeoTracker online database was conducted for the project area (DTSC 2017a and 2017b; SWRCB 2017). The searches revealed no known hazardous material sites within the project site. However; two leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cleanup sites are located at the Costa Mesa Fire Station 3. One of the LUST cleanup sites (RB Case# 083001242T, Loc Case # 89UT102) has a Completed — Case Closed status as of October 26, 1990. The second LUST cleanup site (Loc case # 16UT001) has an Open — Assessment & Interim Remedial Action status as of May 4, 2016. The contaminant of concern is diesel, which leaked from a 1,000 gallon underground storage tank (UST) on March 18, 2016. The UST was removed on April 13, 2016. Elevated concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and various VOCs were detected beneath the former UST. A site assessment conducted at the site has defined the vertical and lateral extent of the affected soil and groundwater, which is totally encompassed within the Fire Station property, and remedial actions are currently underway (AGE 2016). The Proposed Project does not include Fire Station 3. As such, ground disturbing activities associated with the Proposed Project are not anticipated to encounter hazardous materials associated with the LUST site at Fire Station 3. Impacts would be less than significant. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-23 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects e) For a project located within an airport land Less than use plan or, where such a plan has not been Significant adopted, within two miles of a public airport Potentially Less than Less than or public use airport, would the project result Significant Significant Significant No in a safety hazard for people residing or Potentially with Less than working in the project area? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact with wildlands? ❑ ❑ ❑ The closest airport to the project site is John Wayne Airport located approximately three miles to the northeast. The project site is not located within the Safety Compatibility Zones for John Wayne Airport (OC ALUC 2008). As such, no impact would occur. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private Less than airstrip, would the project result in a safety Significant hazard for people residing or working in the Potentially with Less than where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized Significant Mitigation Significant No project area? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ There are no private airstrips within the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, no impact would occur. g) Would the project impair implementation of Less than or physically interfere with an adopted Significant emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Potentially Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized ❑ ® ❑ ❑ The City of Costa Mesa has an Emergency Operations Plan that identifies the City's planning, organization, and response policies and procedures during an emergency (City of Costa Mesa 2013). Construction of the Proposed Project would require construction to occur within Park and Anaheim Avenues and would result in temporary construction truck traffic which has the potential to interfere with emergency response access to areas near the project site. Impact to emergency access would be less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. h) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including Less than where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized Significant areas or where residences are intermixed Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No with wildlands? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The Proposed Project is located in a developed area of the City of Costa Mesa; there are no wildlands in the vicinity. No impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-24 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects Mitigation Measures HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of grading permits, submit for review and approval a Construction Management Plan. This plan features methods to minimize disruption to the neighboring uses to the fullest extent that is reasonable and practicable. The plan shall include construction parking and vehicle access and specifying staging areas and delivery and hauling truck routes. The plan should mitigate disruption during construction. The truck route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas and major truck traffic during peak hours. The total truck trips to the site shall not exceed 200 trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus 100 truck trips from the site) unless approved by the Development Services Director or Transportation Services Manager. 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.9.1 Environmental Setting The project site is relatively flat and generally slopes from its highest point on the southeast to its lowest point on the northwest. The project site is occupied by a public library, a community center, and a park. The park component of the project site consists of sport fields, a Historical Society building, accompanying parking, and a fire station, along with several small areas containing asphalt, concrete pads, and landscaping. Existing storm runoff conveyance occurs through surface flow in gutters located throughout the site parking. In landscaped areas where runoff is not expected to reach the paved parking lots, water is captured at area drains and catch basins and conveyed underground to the public right of way at Anaheim Avenue. 4.9.2 Hydrology and Water Quality (IX.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project violate any water quality Less than standards or waste discharge requirements? 9 q Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ During construction of the Proposed Project water quality impacts could occur without proper controls. Soils loosened during grading, spills of fluids or fuels from vehicles and equipment or miscellaneous construction materials and debris, if mobilized and transported offsite in overland flow, could degrade water quality. Because the area of ground disturbance affected by construction of the Proposed Project would exceed one acre, the Proposed Project would be subject to the requirements of the statewide NPDES stormwater permit for construction activity (Order 98-08 DWQ). A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for the Proposed Project to comply with the requirements of the local NPDES Stormwater Program (KPFF 2016). The proponent of the Proposed Project would implement a SWPPP listing BMPs to prevent construction pollutants and products from violating any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Impacts would be less than significant. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-25 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects b) Would the project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? The Proposed Project does not involve the withdrawal of groundwater. The Proposed Project would result in an increase of approximately one acre of park open space. This one acre would include both pervious (landscaped areas) and impervious (hardscapes) surface. The new library would have a smaller building footprint than the existing NCC that would be demolished. The Proposed Project would also construct a new paved parking lot in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society building in an area that is currently unpaved. The Proposed Project would result in a slight increase in impervious surfaces. However, the proposed drainage system includes an infiltration system designed to infiltrate the 0.75 -inch storm and have an overflow connection to the public right-of- way. The proposed storm drain lines would be sized to accommodate the 25 -year design storm and to prevent flooding of structures for the 100 -year storm. The design intent is to covey captured water to the infiltration system throughout the year and to allow generated runoff to infiltrate into native soils. In the event of more significant storm events, such as the 25 -year design storm, the intent is to capture the entirety of the storm within the underground conveyance system and allow the infiltration system to fill to capacity and overflow onto Anaheim Avenue (KPFF 2016). Therefore, the Proposed Project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project substantially alter the Less than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project does not involve the withdrawal of groundwater. The Proposed Project would result in an increase of approximately one acre of park open space. This one acre would include both pervious (landscaped areas) and impervious (hardscapes) surface. The new library would have a smaller building footprint than the existing NCC that would be demolished. The Proposed Project would also construct a new paved parking lot in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society building in an area that is currently unpaved. The Proposed Project would result in a slight increase in impervious surfaces. However, the proposed drainage system includes an infiltration system designed to infiltrate the 0.75 -inch storm and have an overflow connection to the public right-of- way. The proposed storm drain lines would be sized to accommodate the 25 -year design storm and to prevent flooding of structures for the 100 -year storm. The design intent is to covey captured water to the infiltration system throughout the year and to allow generated runoff to infiltrate into native soils. In the event of more significant storm events, such as the 25 -year design storm, the intent is to capture the entirety of the storm within the underground conveyance system and allow the infiltration system to fill to capacity and overflow onto Anaheim Avenue (KPFF 2016). Therefore, the Proposed Project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course Less than of a stream or river, in a manner that would Significant result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No off-site? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project would require grading of the project site which would affect the drainage patterns of the site. However, the site's drainage plan would be designed by a registered civil engineer to safely retain, detain, and/or convey stormwater runoff. Drainage patterns would remain similar to existing conditions. No streams or rivers would be altered. Implementation of BMPs would minimize the potential erosion or siltation from the site. A less than significant impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-26 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects d) Would the project substantially alter the Less than water degrade quality? g q ty Potentially existing drainage pattern of the site or area, Less than Less than Mitigation including through the alteration of the course Potentially Significant Impact Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact of a stream or river, or substantially increase ❑ Less than ® ❑ the rate or amount of surface runoff in a Significant manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? Potentially Significant Impact ❑ with Mitigation Incorporated ❑ Less than Significant No Impact Impact ® ❑ Please see the response to IX. c) above. A less than significant impact would occur. e) Would the project create or contribute runoff Less than water degrade quality? g q ty Potentially water, which would exceed the capacity of Less than Less than Mitigation existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Potentially Significant Impact Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The proposed drainage system for the Proposed Project would be designed in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the Orange County Hydrology Manual, to accommodate a 25 -year design storm. The proposed drainage system includes an infiltration system designed to infiltrate the 0.75 - inch storm and have an overflow connection to the public right of way. The proposed storm drain lines would be sized to accommodate the 25 -year design storm and to prevent flooding of structures for the 100 -year storm. The design intent is to covey captured water to the infiltration system throughout the year and to allow generated runoff to infiltrate into native soils. In the event of more significant storm events, such as the 25 -year design storm, the intent is to capture the entirety of the storm within the underground conveyance system and allow the infiltration system to fill to capacity and overflow onto Anaheim Avenue (KPFF 2016). The Proposed Project would continue its existing use and is not anticipated to exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater systems. Impacts to the existing stormwater drainage system would be less than significant. f) Would the project otherwise substantially Less than water degrade quality? g q ty Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ A WQMP has been prepared for the Proposed Project to comply with the requirements of the local NPDES Stormwater Program (KPFF 2016). The proponent of the Proposed Project would implement a SWPPP listing BMPs to prevent construction pollutants and products from violating any water quality standards. A less than significant impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-27 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects g) Would the project place housing within a 100 - Less than Less than seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Potentially year flood hazard area as mapped on a Less than Less than Mitigation federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Potentially Significant Less than Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard Potentially with Less than delineation map? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The Proposed Project does not include housing and therefore does not place housing within any flood zones. No impact would occur. h) Would the project place within a 100 -year Less than Less than seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Potentially flood hazard area structures that would Less than Significant Mitigation or death involving flooding, including flooding Potentially with Less than impede or redirect flood flows? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map for the project site (Panel Nos. 06059CO2681), the project area is located within Flood Zone X. Flood Zone X is described as areas of minimal flood hazard (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA] 2017). The Proposed Project would improve existing facilities at Lions Park. The Lions Park site drainage would be designed so runoff would be captured at inlets, area drains and catch basins, conveyed through underground piping to the proposed infiltration system, and overflow when necessary to the existing public storm drain along Anaheim Avenue (KPFF 2017). Furthermore, the project site has very little flood potential. No impact would occur. i) Would the project expose people or Less than Less than seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Potentially structures to a significant risk of loss, injury Less than Significant Mitigation or death involving flooding, including flooding Potentially with Less than as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ Only a small portion of the City of Costa Mesa is located within the dam inundation area of Prado Dam, and that portion is limited to the area closest to Newport Bay. The project site is not located in the Prado Dam inundation area (City of Costa Mesa 2016a). No impact would occur. j) Would the project be subject to inundation by Less than seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The project area is relatively flat, therefore, is it not in an area subject to mudflows. The project site is located approximately 1.7 miles northeast from the Pacific Ocean. Due to the distance to the ocean the project site would not be subject to inundation from seiches. According to the City of Costa Mesa General Plan Safety Element, the project site is not located in a tsunami inundation area. No impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-28 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.10 Land Use and Planning 4.10.1 Environmental Setting The project site is located at Lions Park. Lions Park includes recreational facilities such as the Downtown Recreation Center, the Downtown Aquatic Center, and other public buildings including the existing NCC, Donald Dungan Library, the Costa Mesa Historical Society building, and Fire Station 3. Lions Park is located within an established residential (multi- and single-family) and commercial neighborhood. Zoning and land use designation for the project site and surrounding areas are described in Table 4.10-1. Table 4.10-1. Surrounding Zoning and Land use Designations Notes: du/ac = dwelling unit per acre Source: City of Costa Mesa 2015 and 2016a 4.10.2 Land Use and Planning (X.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project physically divide an Less than established community? Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The Proposed Project is located in an area zoned I&R - Institutional and Recreational (City of Costa Mesa 2015). The Proposed Project would be located at Lions Park in a fully developed area of the City. The Proposed Project would continue an existing use. The Proposed Project would not physically divide an established community. No impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-29 February 2017 Zoning Designation Land Use Designation Existing Land Use Project I&R — Institutional and Public/Institutional Parkland Site Recreational North R3 - Multiple Family High Density Residential (20 Multi -family residential Residential du/ac PDC — Planned Development Commercial, Commercial Center, High Commercial/Retail, Multi - East R3 - Multiple Family Density Residential (20 du/ac) family residential Residential RI - Single Family Low Density Residential (8 South Residential, R2 -HD - du/ac), Medium Density Single-family residential Multiple Family Residential Residential (12 du/ac) (High Density) R2 -HD - Multiple Family Residential (High Density), High Density Residential (20 Multi -family and single West R3 - Multiple Family du/ac) family residential Residential Notes: du/ac = dwelling unit per acre Source: City of Costa Mesa 2015 and 2016a 4.10.2 Land Use and Planning (X.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project physically divide an Less than established community? Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The Proposed Project is located in an area zoned I&R - Institutional and Recreational (City of Costa Mesa 2015). The Proposed Project would be located at Lions Park in a fully developed area of the City. The Proposed Project would continue an existing use. The Proposed Project would not physically divide an established community. No impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-29 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects b) Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning Less than ordinance) adopted for the purpose of Significant avoiding or mitigating an environmental Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No effect? Imoact Incornorated Imnart Imna The Proposed Project is located on a project site with I&R — Institutional and Recreational zoning designation and a Public/Institutional land use designation (City of Costa Mesa 2015 and 2016). The Proposed Project would result in the construction a new library and caf6, demolition of the existing NCC, and the renovation and repurposing of the existing library into the new NCC. The Proposed Project would continue the same land uses within the project site; therefore, it would not conflict with the City's land use plans. No impact would occur. c) Would the project conflict with any applicable Less than habitat conservation plan or natural potentially Significant with Less than community conservation plan? Significant Mitigation Significant No residents of the state? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The project site is not located within a Habitat Reserve System nor a Covered Habitat area as identified by the Central and Coastal Subregion Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) (County of Orange 1996). No impact would occur. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.11 Mineral Resources 4.11.1 Mineral Resources (XI.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project result in the loss of Less than availability of a known mineral resource that Significant would be of value to the region and the Potentially with Less than residents of the state? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ According to the City of Costa Mesa General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) the project site is located in an area classified as Mineral Resource Zone 3 (MRZ-3). MRZ-3 is defined as areas containing construction aggregate deposits, the significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data (City of Costa Mesa 2016b). The Proposed Project consists of improvements to Lions Park and does not include mining activities. The project site is currently developed as a park and would remain as such. No impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-30 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral Less than resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Potentially Significant Impact ❑ Significant with Mitigation Incorporated ❑ Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ The Proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan, because no mining operations exist on or in the vicinity of the project site (City of Costa Mesa 2016b; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] 2017). No impact would occur. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.12 Noise 4.12.1 Environmental Setting Some land uses are considered more sensitive to intrusive noise than others due to the amount of noise exposure and the types of activities typically involved at the receptor location. Noise exposure at these sensitive receptors is predicated on the magnitude and frequency of said noise event, exposure duration, and exterior -to -interior sound attenuation. Residences, schools, motels and hotels, libraries, religious institutions, hospitals, nursing homes, and parks are generally more sensitive to noise than commercial and industrial land uses. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site include Lions Park itself, Donald Dungan Library within the project site, Casa Bella and Park Center Place Apartments along Park Avenue, and the residences west and south of the project site along Anaheim Avenue and W. 18th Street. City of Costa Mesa General Plan Noise Element It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to protect its citizens and property from injury, damage, or destruction from noise hazards and to work towards improved noise abatement. Objectives and policies applicable to the Proposed Project are presented below: • Objective N-1: Control noise levels within the City for the protection of residential areas and other sensitive land uses from excessive and unhealthful noise. o Policy N-2.2: Require, as a part of the environmental review process, that full consideration be given to the existing and projected noise environment. City of Costa Mesa Municipal Code — Noise Control Ordinance 13-279 — Exceptions - The provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance do not apply to construction equipment, vehicles, or work between the following approved hours, provided that all required permits for construction, repair or remodeling have been obtained from the appropriate City departments: 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Saturdays. Construction activities on Sundays and holidays are prohibited. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-31 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects 4.12.2 Noise (XII.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project result in exposure of Less than persons to or generation of noise levels in Less than excess of standards established in the local Potentially Significant Impact Significant Less than Significant No Impact Impact general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Potentially Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Noise generated by the construction of the Proposed Project would be temporary and no permanent noise sources would be created. Construction activities would take place within permitted hours (7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Saturdays) per the City of Costa Mesa Municipal Code Noise Control Ordinance 13-279 - Exceptions. The Proposed Project would continue an existing use; therefore, operational noise levels are anticipated to be similar to existing conditions. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project result in exposure of Less than persons to or generation of excessive Significant groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Potentially Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project would introduce temporary ground -borne vibrations and noise levels in the project vicinity related to the use of heavy construction equipment. The potential impacts would diminish with distance. All sensitive receptors within the project site (i.e. Lions Park, Donald Dungan Library, and other park facilities) are part of the proposed construction and renovation. There are no other sensitive receptors location within 25 feet of the site that would be affected by the vibration (FTA 2006). Additionally, construction activities would be restricted to day time hours consistent with the City of Costa Mesa Municipal Code requirements, thereby eliminating potential vibration impacts during the sensitive nighttime hours. The vibration from the use of heavy equipment would end at the completion of the construction activities. A less than significant impact would occur. c) Would the project result in a substantial Less than permanent increase in ambient noise levels in Significant the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Potentially Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ Due to the temporary nature of construction activities, no permanent increases in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity are expected. Operational noise impacts would be the same as current conditions. No impact would occur. d) Would the project result in a substantial Less than temporary or periodic increase in ambient Significant noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Potentially Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-32 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects Temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels would occur during construction of the Proposed Project. Ambient noise levels would vary depending upon the specific activities and equipment used. The potential noise related impacts would end at the completion of construction activities. The Proposed Project would continue the existing use of the project site; therefore, operational ambient noise levels are anticipated to be similar to existing conditions. A less than significant impact would occur. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport Less than or public use airport, would the project Significant expose people residing or working in the Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No project area to excessive noise levels? Impact Incorporated Impact Impz The closest airport to the project site is John Wayne Airport (JWA) located approximately three miles to the northeast. The project site is not located within a Noise Impact Zone for John Wayne Airport (OC ALUC 2008). As such, no impact would occur. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private Less than airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Significant Impact ❑ Significant with Mitigation Incorporated ❑ Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ There are no private airstrips within the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, no impact would occur. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.13 Population and Housing 4.13.2 Population and Housing (XIII.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and Less than businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other g infrastructure)? Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impa The Proposed Project would demolish the existing NCC to make room for a new library and increase park space by approximately one acre. The Proposed Project does not propose the construction of new housing or businesses and therefore is not anticipated to directly or indirectly induce population growth in the area. The Proposed Project is not expected to generate a substantial permanent Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-33 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects increase in employment opportunities in the area capable of inducing population growth. The existing site uses would remain. A less than significant impact would occur. b) Would the project displace substantial Less than numbers of existing housing, necessitating Significant the construction of replacement housing Potentially with Less than elsewhere? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The Proposed Project would be contained within Lions Park and would not displace housing. The Proposed Project involves improvements to existing facilities within Lions Park, construction of a new library, and offsite street improvements. No impact would occur. c) Would the project displace substantial Less than numbers of people, necessitating the Significant construction of replacement housing Potentially with Less than elsewhere? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The Proposed Project would consist of improvement to existing facilities within Lions Park and would not include the removal of housing; therefore, it would not displace people. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.14 Public Services 4.14.1 Environmental Setting Police Services The City of Costa Mesa Police Department is located less than two miles northeast of the project site and provides police services to the project site (City of Costa Mesa 2017a). Fire Services The City of Costa Mesa Fire Department Park Fire Station is located adjacent to the project site along Park Avenue and provides fire services to the project site (City of Costa Mesa 2017b). Schools There are three schools in the vicinity of the project site: Costa Mesa Head Start, Pomona Elementary School, and St. Joachim Preschool. All schools are located over 0.5 mile from the project site but within one mile. Parks The City of Costa Mesa operates 31 parks within its city boundaries encompassing approximately 415 acres (City of Costa Mesa 2016a). The project site is located with Lions Park in the City of Costa Mesa. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-34 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects 4.14.2 Public Services (XIV.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: • Fire Protection? • Police Protection? • Schools? • Parks? • Other Public Facilities? Less than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Imm Lions Park is a public park, where it is common for homeless people to congregate. Nearby facilities provide services (food and shelter) to homeless people in the area. Orange Coast Interfaith Shelter and Someone Care Soup Kitchen are located approximately 0.5 miles northwest of the project site. The Proposed Project would not affect homeless services in the area because none are located within the project site. The Proposed Project would be built in two phases and would only affect park operations near the existing NCC, library, and the area between the Costa Mesa Historical Society Building and Anaheim Avenue. Other areas in the park would remain open during construction. As such, impacts to parks would be less than significant. The Proposed Project would not create a substantial new fire or public safety hazard. The Proposed Project involves improvements to existing facilities within Lions Park, construction of a new library, and off-site street improvements. The Proposed Project would be beneficial to the local community of Costa Mesa by providing updated public facilities. The Proposed Project is not expected to induce population growth; therefore, there would be no additional demand for schools, parks, or other public facilities. The Proposed Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered government facilities nor affect response time or other performance objectives. No increase in police protection services are anticipated (Lt. Clint Dieball, personal communication, February 7, 2017). No impact would occur. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-35 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects 4.15 Recreation 4.15.1 Recreation (XV.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project increase the use of existing Less than neighborhood and regional parks or other Less than recreational facilities such that substantial Potentially Significant Less than physical deterioration of the facility would Potentially with Less than occur or be accelerated? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact mass transit? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Imna The Proposed Project would demolish the existing NCC and construct a new library south of the existing NCC and a new cafe. The Proposed Project would also renovate and repurpose the existing library into the new NCC. The new library would have a smaller building footprint that the existing NCC thereby increasing park open space by approximately one -acre resulting in a beneficial impact to the community. The Proposed Project does not involve residential uses and would not cause a direct increase in the population of the project area. No impact would occur. b) Does the project include recreational facilities Less than or require the construction or expansion of Significant recreational facilities, which might have an Potentially with Less than adverse physical effect on the environment? Significant Mitigation Incorporated Significant NoImpact Impact Impact to intersections, streets, highways, and ❑ ® ❑ ❑ As stated in the response to question XV. a) above, the Proposed Project would result in an increase in park open space by approximately one acre. The environmental impacts of construction and operation of the Proposed Project, including required mitigation measures, are discussed in this Initial Study. Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures required for this project are provided in the appropriate sections of this Initial Study. 4.16 Transportation/Traffic 4.16.1 Transportation/Traffic (XVI.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited Less than to intersections, streets, highways, and Significant freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and Potentially with Less than mass transit? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Imna Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-36 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects Construction Impacts The Proposed Project would generate short-term construction related vehicle trips. However, traffic generated by construction of the Proposed Project would be temporary and would not conflict with the City of Costa Mesa's Circulation Element. Impacts would be less than significant. Operational Impacts Operational impacts are anticipated to be similar to existing conditions because the Proposed Project would continue an existing use and no substantial increases in building square footages would occur. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other Less than standards established by the county Significant congestion management agency for Potentially Significant with Less than Mitigation Significant No designated roads or highways? Impact Incorporated Impact Impa The Proposed Project would generate traffic similar to the existing condition. As such, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to conflict with the applicable congestion management program. No impact would occur. c) Would the project result in a change in air Less than traffic patterns, including either an increase in Significant traffic levels or a change in location that Potentially with Less than results in substantial safety risks? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ The closest airport to the project site is John Wayne Airport located approximately three miles to the northeast. The project site is not located within the Safety Compatibility Zones for John Wayne Airport (OC ALUC 2008). The Proposed Project would not include structures or operational conditions that would require a change of air traffic patterns or increase traffic levels or a change in location that would result in substantial safety risks. No impact would occur. d) Would the project substantially increase Less than hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp Significant curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Potentially Significant Impact ❑ with Mitigation Incorporated ❑ Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ The Proposed Project includes off-site street improvements to Park and Anaheim Avenues. Park Avenue improvements include new sidewalks, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, street trees, street furnishings, and approximately 29 new parking spaces. These improvements would affect approximately 580 LF of street frontage and 17,430 SF in area. Anaheim Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-37 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects Avenue improvements include new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, and street trees. These improvements would affect approximately 145 LF of street frontage and 2,350 SF in area. Improvements have been designed by a registered civil engineer to meet the City of Costa Mesa's development standards. No impact would occur. e) Would the project result in inadequate Less than en access? Significant emergency � Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Construction of the Proposed Project would require construction activities to occur within Park and Anaheim Avenues and would result in temporary construction truck traffic which has the potential to interfere with emergency response access to areas near the project site. Impact to emergency access would be less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. f) Would the project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public Less than transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Potentially Significant Impact ❑ Significant with Mitigation Incorporated ❑ Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ The City of Costa Mesa General Plan's Circulation Element includes a discussion on Active Transportation (City of Costa Mesa 2016a). The General Plan defines Active Transportation as non - motorized travel modes such as walking, biking, or skateboarding. An Active Transportation Plan (ATP) has been prepared for the City. The ATP did not identify existing Active Transportation facilities near the project site. Proposed facilities under the ATP include a Class II bike path along West 18th Street on the southern boundary of Lions Park. This area is not within the project site. The Proposed Project would construct pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks, and bike racks throughout the project site resulting in beneficial impact to alternative modes of transportation. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 is listed under Section 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials. 4.17 Tribal Cultural Resources This section describes the affected environment and regulatory setting for Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) in the project area. Section 21074(a) of the Public Resource Code defines TCRs for the purpose of CEQA as: 1. Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes (geographically defined in terms of the size and scope), sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following: a. included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources; and/or Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-38 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects b. included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1; and/or c. a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. The following analysis of the potential environmental impacts related to TCRs is derived primarily from the following sources: • California Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search, dated February 2017 • Correspondence with California Native American tribes that are culturally and traditionally associated with the project area • Cultural resource records search and field survey completed by ECORP Consulting, Inc. • Ethnographic overviews of the Juaneno and Gabrielino (see Section 4.17.1). 4.17.1 Environmental Setting Cu/tura/ Setting The project area formed part of the territory occupied by the Juaneno and Gabrielino Native American groups when the Spanish arrived in A.D. 1769. Juaneno At the time of contact with Europeans, the Juaneno were the main occupants of southern Orange County and northwestern San Diego County. The term Juaneno came from the group's association with Mission San Juan Capistrano, established in 1776 (Castillo 1978:100). The Juaneno spoke a Takic language. The Takic group of languages is part of the Uto-Aztecan language family. The Juaneno lived in villages of up to 250 people located near permanent water and a variety of food sources. Each village was typically located at the center of an established territory from which resources for the group were gathered. Small groups left the village for short periods of time to hunt, fish, and gather plant foods. While away from the village, they established temporary camps and created locations where food and other materials were processed. Archaeologically, such locations are evidenced by manos and metates for seed grinding, bedrock mortars for acorn pulverizing, and lithic scatters indicating manufacturing or maintenance of stone tools (usually made of chert) used in hunting or butchering. Overnight stays in field camps are indicated by fire -affected rock used in hearths (Mason, et al. 2002). One of the most important food resources for inland groups was acorns gathered from oak groves in canyons, drainages, and foothills. Acorns were ground into flour using mortars and pestles. Seeds from sage and grasses, goosefoot, and California buckwheat were collected and ground into meal with manos and metates. Protein was supplied through the meat of deer, rabbits, and other animals, hunted with the bow and arrow or trapped using snares, nets, and deadfalls. Coastal Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-39 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Protects dwellers collected shellfish and used carved shell hooks for fishing in bay/estuary, nearshore, and kelp bed zones. Dried fish and shellfish were probably traded for inland products such as acorns and deer meat. Gabrielino At the time of contact with Europeans, the Gabrielino were the main occupants of the southern Channel Islands, the Los Angeles basin, northern Orange County, and extended as far east as the western San Bernardino Valley. The term "Gabrielino" came from the group's association with Mission San Gabriel Arcangel, established in 1771. The Gabrielino are believed to have been one of the most populous and wealthy Native American tribes in southern California prior to European contact. (Bean and Smith 1978; McCawley 1996; Moratto 1984). The Gabrielino spoke a Takic language. The Takic group of languages is part of the Uto-Aztecan language family. The Gabrielino occupied villages located along rivers and at the mouths of canyons. Populations ranged from 50 to 200 inhabitants. Residential structures within the villages were domed, circular, and made from thatched tule or other available wood. Gabrielino society was organized by kinship groups, with each group composed of several related families who together owned hunting and gathering territories. Settlement patterns varied according to the availability of floral and faunal resources (Bean and Smith 1978; McCawley 1996; Miller 1991). Vegetal staples consisted of acorns, chia, seeds, pinon nuts, sage, cacti, roots, and bulbs. Animals hunted included deer, antelope, coyote, rabbits, squirrels, rodents, birds, and snakes. The Gabrielino also fished and collected marine shellfish (Bean and Smith 1978; McCawley 1996; Miller 1991). By the late 18th century, Gabrielino population had significantly dwindled due to introduced European diseases and dietary deficiencies. Gabrielino communities disintegrated as families were taken to the missions (Bean and Smith 1978; McCawley 1996; Miller 1991). However, current descendants of the Gabrielino are preserving Gabrielino culture. Regulatory Setting Effective July 1, 2015, Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) amended CEQA to require that: 1) a lead agency provide notice to any California Native American tribes that have requested notice of projects proposed by the lead agency; and 2) for any tribe that responded to the notice within 30 days of receipt with a request for consultation, the lead agency must consult with the tribe. Topics that may be addressed during consultation include TCRs, the potential significance of project impacts, type of environmental document that should be prepared, and possible mitigation measures and project alternatives. Pursuant to AB 52, Section 21073 of the Public Resources Code defines California Native American tribes as "a Native American tribe located in California that is on the contact list maintained by the NAHC for the purposes of Chapter 905 of the Statutes of 2004." This includes both federally and non -federally recognized tribes. Recognizing that California tribes are experts in their TCRs and heritage, AB 52 requires that CEQA lead agencies initiate consultation with tribes at the commencement of the CEQA process to identify TCRs. Furthermore, because a significant effect on a TCR is considered a significant impact on the environment under CEQA, consultation is required to develop appropriate avoidance, impact minimization, and mitigation measures. On February 7, 2017, the City sent project notification letters to fourteen California Native American tribes, listed in Section 2.6 of this Initial Study. The letter provided a brief description of the Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-40 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects Proposed Project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the tribe has 30 days to request consultation. The 30 -day response period concludes on March 9, 2017. On February 9, 2017, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation replied. Chairman Andrew Salas did not identify any specific TCRs in the project area, but expressed a general concern for cultural resources and requested one tribal monitor to be present during ground disturbing activities. Should additional tribes respond to the offer to consult, the City will initiate consultation and take into consideration information provided by the tribe. Additional information about potential impacts to TCRs was drawn from the ethnographic context (summarized above), the results of the cultural resources records search and field survey conducted by ECORP, and the results of a search of the Sacred Lands File of the NAHC, which were obtained by ECORP in February 2017. The cultural resources records search and field survey conducted failed to identify any prehistoric or Native American archaeological sites. The nearest village, based on ethnohistoric and archaeological information, is over 1.5 miles away from the current project area (Koerper, et al. 1996). In addition, the Sacred Lands File failed to identify any sacred lands or tribal resources in or near the project area. 4.17.2 Tribal Cultural Resources (XVII.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion AB 52 established that a substantial adverse change to a TCR has a significant effect on the environment. In assessing substantial adverse change, the City must determine whether or not the project will adversely affect the qualities of the resource that convey its significance. The qualities are expressed through integrity. Integrity of a resource is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association [CCR Title 14, Section 4852(c)]. Impacts are significant if the resource is demolished or destroyed or if the characteristics that made the resource eligible are materially impaired [CCR Title 14, Section 15064.5(a)]. Accordingly, impacts to a TCR would likely be significant if the project negatively affects the qualities of integrity that made it significant in the first place. In making this determination, the City needs to address the aspects of integrity that are important to the TCR's significance. No TCRs were identified within or immediately adjacent to the project area and therefore, the Project will not result in a significant impact to known TCRs. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-41 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or Less than object with cultural value to a Significant California Native American tribe, Potentially Significant with Mitigation Less than Significant No and that is: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical ❑ ❑ ® ❑ resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe. No known TCRs have been identified (as defined in PRC Section 21074) within the project area. The Proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse impact to a known TCR. However, there always remains a possibility that unrecorded TCRs may be exposed during project construction. If previously unknown resources are encountered during construction and are likely to be associated with Native American culture, all activities in the vicinity of the find would be suspended. The City of Costa Mesa would contact the appropriate Native American tribes listed in Section 2.6 of this Initial Study to consult on the treatment of the resource. In an AB 52 response letter sent to the City on February 9, 2017, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation requested that one of their certified Native American monitors be on site during any and all ground disturbances. However, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation did not identify a specific TCR within the project site boundaries. Furthermore, the letter states that their villages were based on clan or lineage groups with their home base sites marked by midden deposits often with bedrock mortars. There are no midden deposits or bedrock mortars on the project site. The nearest village to the project site is Genga (ORA -58), over 1.5 miles northwest of Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-42 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects Lions Park on the east bank of the Santa Ana River in Fairview Park (Koerper, et al. 1996). As such, the unanticipated discovery procedure listed above is adequate. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. 4.18 Utilities and Service Systems 4.18.1 Environmental Setting Water Service Mesa Water District (MWD) provides the City of Costa Mesa, including the project site, with water services. The MWD's water is a blend of local groundwater and imported water from northern California and the Colorado River. MWD pumps groundwater from Orange County's groundwater basin using eight wells. The groundwater is replenished by water from the Santa Ana River and imported water purchased from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD 2017). The estimated capacity is more than adequate to meet the current water demand for the project site (MWD 2015). Wastewater Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD) provides sewer services to the City of Costa Mesa and the project site. The CMSD maintains 224.2 miles of gravity sewer mains. CMSD has 20 sewer pumping stations located within the collection system to convey flow from low lying areas to higher elevations (CMSD 2017). Solid Waste The City of Costa Mesa is in the CMSD which is serviced by CR&R for residential curbside refuse and recycling collection. The CMSD is one of the few agencies in Orange County that offer comingled trash and recycling services. The District is the first agency in Orange County to recycle our organics waste (CMSD 2017). 4.18.2 Utilities and Service Systems (XVIII.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Would the project exceed wastewater Less than treatment requirements of the applicable Significant Potentially with Less than Regional Water Quality Control Board? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project would have similar wastewater service needs as the existing Lions Park facilities that would be demolished, replaced, and/or renovated. Once the Proposed Project is built, the existing NCC would be demolished and replaced with the Donald Dungan Library. A new library building would be built south of the existing NCC. Additionally, the Proposed Project would include the construction of a new 890 SF cafe to serve the park and park facilities. These improvements would increase park open space by approximately one acre and are not expected to substantially increase wastewater treatment requirements from existing conditions. A less than significant impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-43 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects b) Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater Less than treatment facilities or expansion of existing Significant facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impa The Proposed Project would not create the need for new water or wastewater treatment facilities because the Proposed Project would not substantially increase the amount of water needed or wastewater generated compared to the existing conditions at Lions Park. Once the Proposed Project is built, the existing use of the site would remain. The Proposed Project would have additional water needs resulting from the operation of a new 890 SF cafe. These water needs are not considered substantial. A less than significant impact would occur. c) Would the project require or result in the Less than construction of new stormwater drainage Less than facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the Potentially Significant Impact Significant Less than Significant No Impact Impact construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Potentially Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project would not require or result in the construction or expansion of offsite stormwater drainage facilities. The Proposed Project would construct a shallow infiltration system located below the surface of the proposed parking lot adjacent to the Costa Mesa Historical Society building. This system would treat and infiltrate the 0.75 -inch design storm based on criteria set forth by the City of Costa Mesa's WQMP (KPFF 2016). The infiltration system would capture generated stormwater until capacity is reached and then overflow into the drainage facilities along Anaheim Avenue. Additionally, during construction the Proposed Project would implement a construction SWPPP, which includes BMPs. A less than significant impact would occur. d) Would the project have sufficient water Less than supplies available to serve the project from Significant existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Potentially Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The Proposed Project would not substantially increase the demand for water compared to existing conditions at Lions Park. As stated in the response to question b) of this section, the Proposed Project would have a slight increase in operational water needs. However, the site would retain its current use. The additional operational water needs are not considered substantial. A less than significant impact would occur. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-44 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects e) Would the project result in a determination Less than by the wastewater treatment provider, which Potentially Significant Less than serves or may serve the project that it has Potentially Less than Less than adequate capacity to serve the project's Significant Significant Significant No projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Potentially Significant Impact ❑ with Mitigation Incorporated ❑ Less than Significant No Impact Impact ® ❑ The Proposed Project would not increase the demand for wastewater treatment because the Proposed Project would not generate substantial additional wastewater over existing conditions at the current Lions Park. The Proposed Project would involve improvements to Lions Park including the replacement of the existing NCC with the renovated Donald Dungan Library. A new library building would be built within Lions Park to replace the Donald Dungan Library, now repurposed as the NCC. Once the Proposed Project is built, the existing use of the site would remain. The Proposed Project would have additional water needs resulting from the operation of a new 890 SF s cafe. These water needs are not considered substantial. A less than significant impact would occur. f) Would the project be served by a landfill with Less than sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate Potentially Significant Less than solid waste? Potentially with Less than the project's solid waste disposal needs? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Any construction waste would be disposed of at the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, the Olinda Landfill, or the Prima Deshecha Landfill which are all permitted to accept commercial waste (OC Waste & Recycling 2017). The minimal increase in waste would not be expected to affect the permitted capacity of these landfills. A less than significant impact would occur. g) Would the project comply with federal, state, Less than and local statutes and regulations related to Potentially Significant with Less than solid waste? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ Waste generated by the Proposed Project would comply with solid waste statues and regulations. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measures No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-45 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects 4.19 Mandatory Findings of Significance 4.19.1 Mandatory Findings of Significance (XIX.) Environmental Checklist and Discussion a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Impacts to biological resources and cultural resources are discussed in the respective sections of this Initial Study. Impacts would be less than significant with Mitigation Measures B-1, B-2, CR -1, CR -2, and CR -3. b) Does the project have impacts that are Less than Less than Significant Potentially with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Impacts to biological resources and cultural resources are discussed in the respective sections of this Initial Study. Impacts would be less than significant with Mitigation Measures B-1, B-2, CR -1, CR -2, and CR -3. b) Does the project have impacts that are Less than individually limited, but cumulatively Significant considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable" Potentially with Less than means that the incremental effects of a Significant Mitigation Significant No project are considerable when viewed in Impact Less than Impact Impact connection with the effects of past projects, ❑ Significant ❑ ❑ the effects of other current projects, and the Potentially with Less than effects of probable future projects)? Significant Impact Mitigation Incorporated Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Impacts from the Proposed Project would not be cumulatively considerable with the implementation of the Mitigation Measures listed in this Initial Study. c) Does the project have environmental effects Less than that will cause substantial adverse effects on Significant Potentially with Less than human beings, either directly or indirectly? Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Direct and indirect impacts to human beings would be less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures listed in this Initial Study. Environmental Checklist and Discussion 4-46 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects SECTION 5. LIST OF PREPARERS City of Costa Mesa Lead Agency Mel Lee, AICP, Senior Planner Arash Rahimian, P.E., Acting Senior Engineer ECORP Consulting, Inc. CEQA Documentation/Biological and Cultural Resources Jesus "Freddie" Olmos, Senior Environmental Scientist/ Project Manager Anne Surdzial, AICP, QA/QC Alfredo Aguirre, AICP, Staff Environmental Scientist Jerry Aguirre, Associate Environmental Scientist David Carr, Senior Biologist Ryan Villanueva, Senior Biologist Roger Mason, Ph.D., RPA, Principal Archaeologist Lisa Westwood, RPA, Archaeologist Brian Fedrow, Technical Editor Laura Hesse, Word Processor Kunzman Associates, Inc. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Analysis Katie Wilson, MS, Senior Associate List of Preparers 5-1 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK List of Preparers 5-2 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects SECTION 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY [AGE] Advanced GeoEnviron mental, Inc. 2016 Revised Work Plan for Additional Soil Remediation and Groundwater Assessment — Costa Mesa Fire Department, Station 3 1865 Park Avenue, Costa Mesa, California OCHCA Case No. 16UT001. Bean, Lowell J. and Charles R. Smith 1978 Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, California, pp. 538- 549. Edited by R.F. Heizer. William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC. [CDC] California Department of Conservation 1986 State of California Special Studies Zones: Newport Beach Quadrangle Map. 1997 State of California Seismic Hazards Zones: Newport Beach Quadrangle Map. 1998 State of California Seismic Hazards Zones: Newport Beach Quadrangle Map. 2004 Williamson Act Parcels: Agricultural Preserves 2004. Available at ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dirp/wa/Orange WA 03 04.pdf. Accessed on January 26, 2017. 2014 Orange County Important Farmland 2014. Available at ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2014/oral4.pdf. Accessed on January 26, 2017. [DTSC] California Department of Toxic Substances Control 2017a DTSC's Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List — Site Cleanup (Cortese List). Available at http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm. Accessed on January 25, 2017. 2017b EnviroStor. Avaialble at http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/. Accessed on January 25, 2017. [Caltrans] California Department of Transportation 2017 California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hg/LandArch/16 livability/scenic highways/index.htm. Accessed on January 24, 2017. Castillo, Edward D. 1978 The Impact of Euro -American Exploration and Settlement. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, California, edited by R.F. Heizer, pp. 99-127. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Bibliography 6-1 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects City of Costa Mesa 2013 City of Costa Mesa Emergency Operations Plan. 2015 City of Costa Mesa Zoning Map. June 8, 2015. 2016a 2015-2035 General Plan. 2016b City of Costa Mesa General Plan Final EIR. 2017a City of Costa Mesa Police: Hours and Location. Available at: http://www.costamesaca.gov/index.aspx?page=1079. Accessed on January 26, 2017. 2017b Costa Mesa Fire Department. Available at: http://www.costamesaca.gov/index.aspx?page=81. Accessed on January 26, 2017. [CMSD] Costa Mesa Sanitary District 2017 About Costa Mesa Sanitary District. Available at: http://www.cmsdca.gov/index.phi)/who-we-are/about-cmsd. Accessed on January 27, 2017. County of Orange 1996 Central and Coastal Subregion Natural Community Conservation Plan/ Habitat Conservation Plan. Dieball, Clint Lt. 2017 Personal communication. Phone interview with Alfredo Aguirre. February 7. [FEMA] Federal Emergency Management Agency 2017 FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (Official). Available at: http://fema maps arcgis com/home/"webmap)/viewer htmI?webmap=cbeO88e7c87044 64aaOfc34eb99e7f30&extent=-118.02578989207328, 33.621281143337086,- 117.8596216791829,33.668440115771574. Accessed on January 27, 2017. [FTA] Federal Transit Administration 2006 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. [Geotechnologies] Geotechnologies, Inc. 2016 Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the Proposed Donald Dungan Library and Community Center Renovation Project. March 15, 2016. Koerper, Henry C, David Earle, Paul Apodaca, and Roger D. Mason 1996 Archaeological, Ethnohistoric, and Historic Notes Regarding ORA -58 and Other Sites Along the Lower Santa Ana River Drainage, Costa Mesa. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 32(1):1-36. Bibliography 6-2 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects [KPFF] KPFF Consulting Engineers 2016 Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Water Quality Management Plan. December 14, 2016. 2017 The Lions Park Project Hydrology Study. January 2017. [Kunzman] Kunzman Associates, Inc. 2017 Lions Park Air Quality and Global Climate Change Impact Analysis. January 31. Mason, Roger D., Henry C. Koerper, and Mark L. Peterson 2002 Complexity, Demography, and Change in Late Holocene Orange County. In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, edited by J. M. Erlandson and T. L. Jones, pp. 63-81. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Volume 6. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. McCawley, William 1996 The First Angelinos: the Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Malki Museum Press, Morongo Indian Reservation, Banning, California. [MWD] Mesa Water District 2015 Mesa Water District: Final Urban Water Management Plan. 2017 About Mesa Water District. Available at https://www.mesawater.org/abou . Accessed on January 26, 2017. Miller, Bruce W. 1991 The Gabrielino. Sand River Press, Los Osos, California. Moratto, Michael J. 1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida. [NRCS] Natural Resources Conservation Service 2017 Web Soil Survey. Available at http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/. [OC ALUC] Orange County Airport Land Use Commission 2008 Airport Land Use Commission Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. Amended April 17, 2008. OC Waste & Recycling 2017 Active Landfills. Available at: http://oclandfills.com/landfill/. Accessed on January 27, 2017. [SWRCB] California State Water Resources Control Board Bibliography 6-3 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects 2017 GeoTracker. Available at http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/. Accessed on January 25, 2017. [USGS] U.S. Geological Survey 2017 Mineral Resources Data System. Mineral Resources On-line Spatial Data. Available at: https://mrdata.usgs.gov/mineral--resources/mrds-us.htmi. Accessed on January 26, 2017. Bibliography 6-4 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects SECTION 7. LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A — Air Quality/Climate Change Technical Report Appendix B — Hydrology Study Appendix C — Water Quality Management Plan List of Appendices 7-1 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK List of Appendices 7-2 February 2017 Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Proiects APPENDIX A Air Quality/Climate Change Technical Report Traffic Engineering I Transportation Planning I Parking I Noise/Vibration I Expert Witness Air Quality I Global Climate Change I Health Risk Assessment LIONS PARK AIR QUALITY AND GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT ANALYSIS January 31, 2017 Prepared by: Katie Wilson, M.S. ■ Catherine Howe, M.S. Carl Ballard, LEED GA ■ William Kunzman, P.E. KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 1111 Town & Country Road, Suite 34 ■ Orange, California 92868 5005 La Mart Drive, Suite 201 ■ Riverside, California 92507 (714) 973-8383 ■ www.traffic-engineer.com J N 6819 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SETTING............................................................................................1 A. Purpose and Objectives...................................................................................................1 B. Project Location...............................................................................................................1 C. Project Description..........................................................................................................1 D. Phasing and Timing..........................................................................................................2 E. Sensitive Receptors in Project Vicinity.............................................................................2 F. Executive Summary of Findings.......................................................................................3 II. ATMOSPHERIC SETTING.....................................................................................................6 III. POLLUTANTS......................................................................................................................9 A. Criteria Pollutants............................................................................................................ 9 1. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)..........................................................................................9 2. Ozone (03).............................................................................................................. 9 3. Carbon Monoxide(CO).........................................................................................10 4. Sulfur Dioxide(S02)..............................................................................................10 5. Lead(Pb)...............................................................................................................10 6. Particulate Matter(PM).......................................................................................11 7. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)....................................................................11 B. Other Pollutants of Concern..........................................................................................11 1. Toxic Air Contaminants........................................................................................11 2. Asbestos............................................................................................................... 12 C. Greenhouse Gases.........................................................................................................12 1. Water Vapor.........................................................................................................13 2. Carbon Dioxide.....................................................................................................13 3. Methane...............................................................................................................14 4. Nitrous Oxide.......................................................................................................14 5. Chlorofluorocarbons............................................................................................14 6. Hydrofluorocarbons.............................................................................................14 7. Perfluorocarbons..................................................................................................15 8. Sulfur Hexafluoride..............................................................................................15 9. Aerosols................................................................................................................15 10. Global Warming Potential....................................................................................15 IV. AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT...........................................................................................17 A. Regulatory Setting.......................................................................................................... 17 1. International.........................................................................................................17 2. Federal - United States Environmental Protection Agency.................................18 3. State — California Air Resources Board................................................................ 20 4. Regional................................................................................................................28 5. Local — City of Costa Mesa................................................................................... 34 B. Monitored Air Quality....................................................................................................37 V. AIR QUALITY STANDARDS................................................................................................ 42 A. Regional Air Quality.......................................................................................................42 B. Local Air Quality.............................................................................................................42 C. Toxic Air Contaminants..................................................................................................42 APPENDICES Appendix A — Glossary of Terms Appendix B — CaIEEMod Model Daily Emissions Printouts Appendix C — CaIEEMod Model Annual Emissions Printouts and LEED information D. Odor Impacts..................................................................................................................43 E. Greenhouse Gases.........................................................................................................43 VI. SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION -RELATED AIR QUALITY IMPACTS.......................................48 A. Construction -Related Regional Impacts........................................................................48 1. Construction -Related Criteria Pollutants Analysis...............................................48 B. Construction -Related Local Impacts..............................................................................49 1. Local Air Quality Impacts from Construction.......................................................50 2. Construction -Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts.........................................51 3. Construction -Related Odor Impacts....................................................................51 VII. LONG-TERM OPERATIONAL AIR QUALITY IMPACTS..........................................................56 A. Operations -Related Regional Air Quality Impacts......................................................... 56 1. Operations -Related Criteria .p �n o!lutant Analysis....................................................56 2. Cumulative Regional Air Quality Impacts.............................................................57 B. Operations -Related Local Air Quality Impacts...............................................................57 1. Local CO Emission Impacts from Project -Generated Vehicular Trips ..................57 2. Local Air Quality Impacts from On -Site Operations.............................................58 3. Operations -Related Odor Impacts....................................................................... 58 VIII. GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE ANALYSIS............................................................................... 61 A. Methodology..................................................................................................................61 1. Area Sources.........................................................................................................61 2. Energy Usage........................................................................................................61 3. Mobile Sources.....................................................................................................61 4. Waste................................................................................................................... 61 5. Water................................................................................................................... 62 6. Construction.........................................................................................................62 B. Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................62 C. Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency.................................................................................62 IX. AIR QUALITY COMPLIANCE.............................................................................................. 66 A. Criterion 1- Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations..................................66 B. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP?...........................................................66 X. MITIGATION MEASURES.................................................................................................. 68 A. Construction Measures..................................................................................................68 B. Operational Measures...................................................................................................68 XI. REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................69 APPENDICES Appendix A — Glossary of Terms Appendix B — CaIEEMod Model Daily Emissions Printouts Appendix C — CaIEEMod Model Annual Emissions Printouts and LEED information LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Costa Mesa Monthly Climate Data..................................................................................8 Table 2. Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes................................................16 Table 3. State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards.............................................................39 Table 4. South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status.......................................................................40 Table 5. Local Area Air Quality Levels from the Costa Mesa Air Monitoring Station..................41 Table 6. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds................................................................47 Table 7. Construction -Related Regional Pollutant Emissions for Phase 1 ...................................52 Table 8. Construction -Related Regional Pollutant Emissions for Phase 2 ...................................53 Table 9. Maximum Number of Acres Disturbed Per Day for Phases 1 and 2 ..............................54 Table 10. Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptor for Phases 1 and 2 ..................55 Table 11. Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions for Phases 1 and 2 ......................................59 Table 12. Overlapping Regional Construction and Operational Emissions...................................60 Table 13. Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Phases 1 and 2 ....................................64 Table 14. CARB Scoping Plan Measure Comparison......................................................................65 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location Map Figure 2. Site Plan ................. ................................................................................................. . ................................................................................................. 5 I. INTRODUCTION AND SETTING A. Purpose and Objectives This study was performed to address the possibility of regional and local air quality impacts, global climate change impacts, and cancer risk from diesel air emissions. The objectives of the study include: ■ documentation of the atmospheric setting ■ discussion of criteria pollutants and greenhouse gases ■ discussion of the air quality and global climate change regulatory framework ■ discussion of the air quality, greenhouse gases, and cancer risk thresholds of significance ■ analysis of the construction related air quality and greenhouse gas emissions ■ analysis of the operations related air quality and greenhouse gas emissions ■ analysis of the operations related cancer risk from diesel emissions ■ recommendations for mitigation measures ■ analysis of the conformity of the proposed project with the SCAQMD AQMP The City of Costa Mesa is the lead agency responsible for preparation of this air quality analysis, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act authorizing legislation. Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with terms unique to air quality and global climate change, a definition of terms has been provided in Appendix A. B. Prosect Location The project site is located at 570 West 18th Street in Lions Park within the City of Costa Mesa. A vicinity map showing the project location is provided on Figure 1. C. Project Description The proposed project is made up of 3 separate tasks covering approximately 4.57 acres within Lions Park. Task 1 is the development of a new 22,860 square foot library. Task 2 is that of improvements to Lions Park which are to include street -front improvements for portions of Park Avenue (including the addition of 27 street parking spaces) and Anaheim Avenue and the construction of a new surface parking lot located in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society and accessed by Anaheim Avenue. Task 3 is the renovation and expansion of the existing 8,740 gross square foot Donald Dungan Library building into a Neighborhood Community Center. The renovated building would total 9,281 square feet and would include a new catering kitchen, new exterior glazing and entrance doors, new mechanical equipment and electrical panels, new lighting, new audiovisual/information technology equipment and infrastructure, new walled loading/delivery area, new landscaping surrounding the building, and new slurry -coat finish and re -striping of the Park Avenue surface parking lot. The new library building is to be LEED Gold certified and the new Neighborhood Community Center is to be LEED Silver certified. Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan. D. Phasing and Timing The project will be constructed in 2 phases: Phase 1 is that of Tasks 1 and 2, which includes construction of the new 22,860 square foot library, Lions Park improvements (off-site street improvements and new surface parking lot), and demolition of the existing Neighborhood Community Center and associated parking lot. The off-site street improvements for Park Avenue total approximately 580 linear feet of street frontage. Park Avenue's total improvement area is approximately 17,430 square feet. The improvements include new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, parkway landscaping, street trees and furnishings, and 27 new parking spaces. The off-site street improvements for Anaheim Avenue total approximately 145 linear feet of street frontage. Anaheim Avenue's total improvement area is approximately 2,350 square feet. The improvements include new sidewalk, entrance driveway, curb and gutter, and parkway landscaping and street trees. Phase 1 is expected to begin construction in July 2017 and be completed by December 2018. Phase 1 will be operational in 2019. Phase 2 is that of Task 3, which includes the renovation and expansion of the existing 8,740 gross square foot Donald Dungan Library building into a 9,281 square foot Neighborhood Community Center. Phase 2 is expected to begin construction in February 2019 and be completed in February 2020. Phase 2 will be operational in 2020. E. Sensitive Receptors in Prosect Vicinity For the purposes of a CEQA analysis, the SCAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be a receptor such as a residence, hospital, or convalescent facility where it is possible that an individual could remain at the location for 24 hours. SCAQMD also considers land uses such as schools, child care centers, athletic facilities, and playgrounds to be sensitive receptors. Commercial and industrial facilities are not included in the definition of sensitive receptor because employees do not typically remain on-site for a full 24 hours, but are present for shorter periods of time, such as eight hours. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are Lions Park and the surrounding single-family and multi -family residential dwelling units. Single-family detached residential dwelling units are located approximately 47 feet to the west (across Anaheim Avenue) and multi -family attached residential dwelling units are located approximately 52 feet to the west (across Anaheim Avenue), 67 feet to the east (across Park Avenue), and 120 feet north. Additional single-family detached residential dwelling units are located approximately 340 feet south of the proposed project. 2 F. Executive Summary of Findings Construction -Source Emissions Project construction -source emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. For localized emissions, the project will not exceed applicable Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) established by the SCAQMD. Project construction -source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). As discussed herein, the project will comply with all applicable SCAQMD construction -source emission reduction rules and guidelines. Project construction source emissions would not cause or substantively contribute to violation of the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) or National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Established requirements addressing construction equipment operations, and construction material use, storage, and disposal requirements act to minimize odor impacts that may result from construction activities. Moreover, construction -source odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would not result in persistent impacts that would affect substantial numbers of people. Potential construction -source odor impacts are therefore considered less -than -significant. Operational -Source Emissions Project operational -sourced emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. Project operational -source emissions would not result in or cause a significant localized air quality impact as discussed in the Operations - Related Local Air Quality Impacts section of this report. Additionally, project -related traffic will not cause or result in CO concentrations exceeding applicable state and/or federal standards (CO "hotspots). Project operational -source emissions would therefore not adversely affect sensitive receptors within the vicinity of the project. Project operational -source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The project's emissions meet SCAQMD regional thresholds and will not result in a significant cumulative impact. The project does not propose any such uses or activities that would result in potentially significant operational -source odor impacts. Potential operational -source odor impacts are therefore considered less -than significant. Project -related GHG emissions are also considered to be less than significant and will not conflict with the goals of the CARB Scoping Plan. 3 Figure 1 Project Location Map C t .. m a a: 19th Street Plumer Street Center Street i ,a i i � op . 1 "- 18th Street - - - -- - -1- IKIINZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 40 YEARS of ExCEI_LENT SERVICE JN E 4 Figure 2 Site Plan IS H $W11. KUNZMAN AssocIATEs, INC. OvEr, 40 YEARS of EXCELEEM 5VRVICE 1N 6819 s II. ATMOSPHERIC SETTING The proposed project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Costa Mesa. The City of Costa Mesa is located in west Orange County and is bound by the City of Santa Ana to the north; the City of Irvine to the east; the City of Newport Beach to the east, south, and southwest; the City of Fountain Valley to the northwest; and the City of Huntington Beach to the west. The City of Costa Mesa is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is surrounded by mountains trapping the air and its pollutants in the valleys or basins below. The Basin includes all of Orange County and the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties. Bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east, the Basin is an area of high air pollution potential. The regional climate within the Basin is considered Semi -arid and is characterized by warn, summers, mild winters, infrequent seasonal rainfall, moderate daytime onshore breezes, and moderate humidity. Air quality within the Basin is influenced by a wide range of emissions sources—such as dense population centers, heavy vehicular traffic, and industry. Climate change within the Basin is influenced by a wide range of emission sources, such as utility usage, heavy vehicular traffic, industry, and meteorology. The annual average temperature varies throughout the Basin, ranging from the low to mid 60s to over 100 degrees during the summer, measured in Fahrenheit (°F). With a more pronounced oceanic influence, coastal areas show less variability in annual minimum and maximum temperatures than inland areas. The City of Costa Mesa is located in the western coastal portion of the Basin. The annual average temperature in the City ranges from 50 to 72°F, although temperatures can occasionally exceed 90°F and even 1007. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion, which is characterized by increasing temperature with increasing altitude. This inversion limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. As the sun warms the ground and the lower air layer, the temperature of the lower air layer approaches the temperature of the base of the inversion (upper) layer until the inversion layer finally breaks, allowing vertical mixing with the lower layer. Aside from a persistent temperature inversion, the vertical dispersion of air contaminants in the Basin is also affected by wind conditions. The combination of stagnant wind conditions and low inversions produces the greatest pollutant concentrations. Conversely, on days of no inversion or high wind speeds, ambient air pollutant concentrations are the lowest. During periods of low inversions and low wind speeds, air pollutants generated in urbanized areas in the Basin are transported eastward, predominantly into Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Santa Ana winds, which are strong and dry north or northeasterly winds that occur during the fall and winter months, disperse air contaminants differently through the Basin, generally resulting in worse air conditions in Costa Mesa. Santa Ana conditions tend to last for several days at a time. Wind speeds in the City of Costa Mesa annual average about 9.58 miles per hour (mph) (USA.com 2014). The City and its surrounding area also typically experience a daytime onshore sea breeze. While nighttime land breezes can also occur, wind in the Costa Mesa area is almost exclusively from the west, with the exceptions of winter storms and the Santa Ana winds discussed above. [: The majority of annual rainfall in the Basin occurs between December and March. Summer rainfall is minimal and generally limited to scattered thundershowers in coastal regions. The annual average total of rainfall in the City is approximately 13.92 inches (USA.com 2014). In the winter, light nocturnal winds result mainly from the drainage of cool air off of the mountains toward the valley floor while the air aloft over the valley remains warm. This forms a type of inversion known as a radiation inversion. Such winds are characterized by stagnation and poor local mixing and trap pollutants such as automobile exhaust near their source. While these inversions may lead to air pollution "hot spots" in heavily developed coastal areas of the basin, there is not enough traffic in inland valleys to cause any winter air pollution problems. Despite light wind conditions, especially at night and in the early morning, winter is generally a period of good air quality in the project vicinity. The temperature and precipitation levels for the City of Costa Mesa are shown below in Table 1. Table 1 shows that August is typically the warmest month and December is typically the coolest month. Rainfall in the project area varies considerably in both time and space. Almost all the annual rainfall comes from the fringes of mid -latitude storms from late November to early April, with summers being almost completely dry. rA Table 1 Costa Mesa Monthly Climate Data' 1 Source: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca6175 Data taken from the Newport, CA Monitoring Station. Month of Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Descriptor Avg. Max. 64.1 63.6 63.8 65.3 66.7 68.5 71.5 72.9 72.6 71 65.7 64.4 Temperature Avg. Min. 49.5 50.6 52.3 54.6 58.1 61 64 64.8 63.4 59.6 52.1 49.5 Temperature Avg. Total Precipitation (in.) 2.05 2.49 1.68 0.72 0.19 0.0 0.03 0.104 V." 0.37 0.98 1.75 1 Source: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca6175 Data taken from the Newport, CA Monitoring Station. III. POLLUTANTS Pollutants are generally classified as either criteria pollutants or non -criteria pollutants. Federal ambient air quality standards have been established for criteria pollutants, whereas no ambient standards have been established for non -criteria pollutants. For some criteria pollutants, separate standards have been set for different periods. Most standards have been set to protect public health. For some pollutants, standards have been based on other values (such as protection of crops, protection of materials, or avoidance of nuisance conditions). A summary of federal and state ambient air quality standards is provided in the Regulatory Framework section. A. Criteria Pollutants The criteria pollutants consist of: ozone, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, lead, and particulate matter. These pollutants can harm your health and the environment, and cause property damage. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calls these pollutants "criteria" air pollutants because it regulates them by developing human health - based and/or environmentally -based criteria for setting permissible levels. The following provides descriptions of each of the criteria pollutants. 1. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) is the generic term for a group of highly reactive gases which contain nitrogen and oxygen. While most NOx are colorless and odorless, concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) can often be seen as a reddish -brown layer over many urban areas. NOx form when fuel is burned at high temperatures, as in a combustion process. The primary manmade sources of NOx are motor vehicles, electric utilities, and other industrial, commercial, and residential sources that burn fuel. NOx reacts with other pollutants to form, ground -level ozone, nitrate particles, acid aerosols, as well as NO2, which cause respiratory problems. NOx and the pollutants formed from NOx can be transported over long distances, following the patterns of prevailing winds. Therefore controlling NOx is often most effective if done from a regional perspective, rather than focusing on the nearest sources. 2. Ozone 03 Ozone is not usually emitted directly into the air but at ground -level is created by a chemical reaction between NOx and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence of sunlight. Motor vehicle exhaust, industrial emissions, gasoline vapors, chemical solvents as well as natural sources emit NOx and VOC that help form ozone. Ground -level ozone is the primary constituent of smog. Sunlight and hot weather cause ground -level ozone to form with the greatest concentrations usually occurring downwind from urban areas. Ozone is subsequently considered a regional pollutant. Ground -level ozone is a respiratory irritant and an oxidant that increases susceptibility to respiratory infections and can cause substantial damage to vegetation and other materials. Because NOx and VOC are ozone precursors, the health effects associated with ozone are also indirect health effects associated with significant levels of NOx and VOC emissions. 0 3. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless gas that is formed when carbon in fuel is not burned completely. It is a component of motor vehicle exhaust, which contributes about 56 percent of all CO emissions nationwide. In cities, 85 to 95 percent of all CO emissions may come from motor vehicle exhaust. Other sources of CO emissions include industrial processes (such as metals processing and chemical manufacturing), residential wood burning, and natural sources such as forest fires. Woodstoves, gas stoves, cigarette smoke, and unvented gas and kerosene space heaters are indoor sources of CO. The highest levels of CO in the outside air typically occur during the colder months of the year when inversion conditions are more frequent. The air pollution becomes trapped near the ground beneath a layer of warm air. CO is described as having only a local influence because it dissipates quickly. Since CO concentrations are strongly associated with motor vehicle emissions, high CO concentrations generally occur in the immediate vicinity of roadways with high traffic volumes and traffic congestion, active parking lots, and in automobile tunnels. Areas adjacent to heavily traveled and congested intersections are particularly susceptible to high CO concentrations. CO is a public health concern because it combines readily with hemoglobin and thus reduces the amount of oxygen transported in the bloodstream. The health threat from lower levels of CO is most serious for those who suffer from heart disease such as angina, clogged arteries, or congestive heart failure. For a person with heart disease, a single exposure to CO at low levels may cause chest pain and reduce that person's ability to exercise; repeated exposures may contribute to other cardiovascular effects. High levels of CO can affect even healthy people. People who breathe high levels of CO can develop vision problems, reduced ability to work or learn, reduced manual dexterity, and difficulty performing complex tasks. At extremely high levels, CO is poisonous and can cause death. 4. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Sulfur Oxide (SOx) gases (including sulfur dioxide [S021) are formed when fuel containing sulfur, such as coal and oil is burned, and from the refining of gasoline. SOx dissolves easily in water vapor to form acid and interacts with other gases and particles in the air to form sulfates and other products that can be harmful to people and the environment. 5. Lead Pb Lead is a metal found naturally in the environment as well as manufactured products. The major sources of lead emissions have historically been motor vehicles and industrial sources. Due to the phase out of leaded gasoline, metal processing is now the primary source of lead emissions to the air. High levels of lead in the air are typically only found near lead smelters, waste incinerators, utilities, and lead -acid battery manufacturers. Exposure of fetuses, infants and children to low levels of lead can adversely affect the development and function of the central nervous system, 10 leading to learning disorders, distractibility, inability to follow simple commands, and lower intelligence quotient. In adults, increased lead levels are associated with increased blood pressure. 6. Particulate Matter (PM) Particulate matter (PM) is the term for a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets found in the air. Particulate matter is made up of a number of components including acids (such as nitrates and sulfates), organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. The size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing health problems. Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM10) are the particles that generally pass through the throat and nose and enter the lungs. Once inhaled, these particles can affect the heart and lungs and cause serious health effects. Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) have been designated as a subset of PM10 due to their increased negative health impacts and its ability to remain suspended in the air longer and travel further. 7. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Although not a criteria pollutant, reactive organic gases (ROGs), or VOCs, are defined as any compound of carbon—excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate—that participates in atmospheric photochemical reactions. Although there are slight differences in the definition of ROGs and VOCs, the two terms are often used interchangeably. Indoor sources of VOCs include paints, solvents, aerosol sprays, cleansers, tobacco smoke, etc. Outdoor sources of VOCs are from combustion and fuel evaporation. A reduction in VOC emissions reduces certain chemical reactions that contribute to the formulation of ozone. VOCs are transformed into organic aerosols in the atmosphere, which contribute to higher PM10 and lower visibility. B. Other Pollutants of Concern 1. Toxic Air Contaminants In addition to the above -listed criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants (TACs) are another group of pollutants of concern. Sources of toxic air contaminants include industrial processes such as petroleum refining and chrome plating operations, commercial operations such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners, and motor vehicle exhaust. Cars and trucks release at least forty different toxic air contaminants. The most important of these toxic air contaminants, in terms of health risk, are diesel particulates, benzene, formaldehyde, 1,3 -butadiene, and acetaldehyde. Public exposure to toxic air contaminants can result from emissions from normal operations as well as accidental releases. Health effects of toxic air contaminants include cancer, birth defects, neurological damage, and death. Toxic air contaminants are less pervasive in the urban atmosphere than criteria air pollutants, however they are linked to short-term (acute) or long-term (chronic or carcinogenic) adverse human health effects. There are hundreds of different types of 11 toxic air contaminants with varying degrees of toxicity. Sources of toxic air contaminants include industrial processes, commercial operations (e.g., gasoline stations and dry cleaners), and motor vehicle exhaust. According to the 2013 California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality, the majority of the estimated health risk from toxic air contaminants can be attributed to relatively few compounds, the most important of which is diesel particulate matter (DPM). Diesel particulate matter is a subset of PM2.5 because the size of diesel particles are typically 2.5 microns and smaller. The identification of diesel particulate matter as a toxic air contaminant in 1998 led the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to adopt the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel -fueled Engines and Vehicles in September 2000. The plan's goals are a 75 -percent reduction in diesel particulate matter by 2010 and all 85 -percent reduction by 2020 from the 2000 baseline. Diesel engines emit a complex mixture of air pollutants, composed of gaseous and solid material. The visible emissions in diesel exhaust are known as particulate matter or PM, which includes carbon particles or "soot." Diesel exhaust also contains a variety of harmful gases and over 40 other cancer-causing substances. California's identification of diesel particulate matter as a toxic air contaminant was based on its potential to cause cancer, premature deaths, and other health problems. Exposure to diesel particulate matter is a health hazard, particularly to children whose lungs are still developing and the elderly who may have other serious health problems. Overall, diesel engine emissions are responsible for the majority of California's potential airborne cancer risk from combustion sources. 2. Asbestos Asbestos is listed as a TAC by ARB and as a Hazardous Air Pollutant by the EPA. Asbestos occurs naturally in mineral formations and crushing or breaking these rocks, through construction or other means, can release asbestoform fibers into the air. Asbestos emissions can result from the sale or use of asbestos -containing materials, road surfacing with such materials, grading activities, and surface mining. The risk of disease is dependent upon the intensity and duration of exposure. When inhaled, asbestos fibers may remain in the lungs and with time may be linked to such diseases as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma. Naturally occurring asbestos is not present in Orange County. The nearest likely locations of naturally occurring asbestos, as identified in the General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology, is located in Santa Barbara County. Due to the distance to the nearest natural occurrences of asbestos, the project site is not likely to contain asbestos. C. Greenhouse Gases Constituent gases of the Earth's atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), play a critical role in the Earth's radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth's surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N2O), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable 12 climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth's natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State's greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and nitrous oxide (NOx) are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off -gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. The following provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential. 1. Water Vapor Water vapor is the most abundant, important, and variable GHG in the atmosphere. Water vapor is not considered a pollutant; in the atmosphere it maintains a climate necessary for life. Changes in its concentration are primarily considered a result of climate feedbacks related to the warming of the atmosphere rather than a direct result of industrialization. The feedback loop in which water is involved in is critically important to projecting future climate change. As the temperature of the atmosphere rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage (rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil). Because the air is warmer, the relative humidity can be higher (in essence, the air is able to "hold" more water when it is warmer), leading to more water vapor in the atmosphere. As a GHG, the higher concentration of water vapor is then able to absorb more thermal indirect energy radiated from the Earth, thus further warming the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere can then hold more water vapor and so on and so on. This is referred to as a "positive feedback loop." The extent to which this positive feedback loop will continue is unknown as there is also dynamics that put the positive feedback loop in check. As an example, when water vapor increases in the atmosphere, more of it will eventually also condense into clouds, which are more able to reflect incoming solar radiation (thus allowing less energy to reach the Earth's surface and heat it up). 2. Carbon Dioxide The natural production and absorption of CO2 is achieved through the terrestrial biosphere and the ocean. However, humankind has altered the natural carbon cycle by burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. Since the industrial revolution began in the mid 1700s. Each of these activities has increased in scale and distribution. CO2 was the first GHG demonstrated to be increasing in atmospheric concentration with the first conclusive measurements being made in the last half of the 20th century. Prior to the industrial revolution, concentrations were fairly stable at 280 parts per million (ppm). The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, 2014) Emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes contributed about 78% of the total GHG emissions increase from 1970 to 2010, with a similar percentage contribution for the increase during the period 2000 to 2010. Globally, economic and population growth continued to be the most important 13 drivers of increases in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion. The contribution of population growth between 2000 and 2010 remained roughly identical to the previous three decades, while the contribution of economic growth has risen sharply. 3. Methane CHa is an extremely effective absorber of radiation, although its atmospheric concentration is less than that of CO2. Its lifetime in the atmosphere is brief (10 to 12 years), compared to some other GHGs (such as CO2, N2O, and Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). CHa has both natural and anthropogenic sources. It is released as part of the biological processes in low oxygen environments, such as in swamplands or in rice production (at the roots of the plants). Over the last 50 years, human activities such as growing rice, raising cattle, using natural gas, and mining coal have added to the atmospheric concentration of methane. Other anthropocentric sources include fossil - fuel combustion and biomass burning. 4. Nitrous Oxide Concentrations of N2O also began to rise at the beginning of the industrial revolution. In 1998, the global concentration was 314 parts per billion (ppb). N2O is produced by microbial processes in soil and water, including those reactions which occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. In addition to agricultural sources, some industrial processes (fossil fuel -fired power plants, nylon production, nitric acid production, and vehicle emissions) also contribute to its atmospheric load. It is used as an aerosol spray propellant (i.e., in whipped cream bottles, in potato chip bags to keep chips fresh, and in rocket engines and in race cars). 5. Chlorofluorocarbons CFCs are gases formed synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or ethane (C2H6) with chlorine and/or fluorine atoms. CFCs are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at the Earth's surface). CFCs have no natural source, but were first synthesized in 1928. It was used for refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and cleaning solvents. Due to the discovery that they are able to destroy stratospheric ozone, a global effort to halt their production was undertaken. This effort was extremely successful, and the levels of the major CFCs are now remaining level or declining. However, their long atmospheric lifetimes mean that some of the CFCs will remain in the atmosphere for over 100 years. 6. Hydrofluorocarbons HFCs are synthetic man-made chemicals that are used as a substitute for CFCs. Out of all the GHGs, they are one of three groups with the highest global warming potential. The HFCs with the largest measured atmospheric abundances are (in order), HFC -23 (CHF3), HFC -134a (CF3CH2F), and HFC -152a (CH3CHF2). Prior to 1990, the only significant emissions were HFC -23. HFC -134a use is increasing due to its use as a refrigerant. Concentrations of HFC -23 HFC -134a are now about 10 parts per trillion 14 (ppt) each. Concentrations of HFC -152a are about 1 ppt. HFCs are manmade for applications such as automobile air conditioners and refrigerants. 7. Perfluorocarbons PFCs have stable molecular structures and do not break down through the chemical processes in the lower atmosphere. High-energy ultraviolet rays about 60 kilometers above Earth's surface are able to destroy the compounds. Because of this, PFCs have very long lifetimes, between 10,000 and 50,000 years. Two common PFCs are tetrafluoromethane (CF4) and hexafluoroethane (C2F6). Concentrations of CF4 in the atmosphere are over 70 ppt. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semiconductor manufacturing. 8. Sulfur Hexafluoride SF6 is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas. SF6 has the highest global warming potential of any gas evaluated; 23,900 times that of CO2. Concentrations in the 1990s were about 4 ppt. Sulfur hexafluoride is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the magnesium industry, in semiconductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection. 9. Aerosols Aerosols are particles emitted into the air through burning biomass (plant material) and fossil fuels. Aerosols can warm the atmosphere by absorbing and emitting heat and can cool the atmosphere by reflecting light. Cloud formation can also be affected by aerosols. Sulfate aerosols are emitted when fuel containing sulfur is burned. Black carbon (or soot) is emitted during biomass burning due to the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Particulate matter regulation has been lowering aerosol concentrations in the United States; however, global concentrations are likely increasing. 10. Global Warming Potential The Global Warming Potential (GWP) was developed to allow comparisons of the global warming impacts of different gases. Specifically, it is a measure of how much energy the emissions of 1 ton of a gas will absorb over a given period of time, relative to the emissions of 1 ton of carbon dioxide (CO2). The larger the GWP, the more that a given gas warms the Earth compared to CO2 over that time period. The time period usually used for GWPs is 100 years. GWPs provide a common unit of measure, which allows analysts to add up emissions estimates of different gases (e.g., to compile a national GHG inventory), and allows policymakers to compare emissions reduction opportunities across sectors and gases. A summary of the atmospheric lifetime and the global warming potential of selected gases are summarized in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the global warming potential of GHGs ranges from 1 to 22,800. 15 Table 2 Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes' Gas Atmospheric Lifetime Global Warming Potentia 12 (100 Year Horizon) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) —3 1 Methane (CH4) 12 28-36 Nitrous Oxide (NO) 114 298 Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) 1-270 12-14,800 Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) 2,600-50,000 7,390-12,200 Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) 740 17,200 Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) 3,200 22,800 1 Source: http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases.html 2 Compared to the same quantity of CO2 emissions. 3 Carbon dioxide's lifetime is poorly defined because the gas is not destroyed over time, but instead moves among different parts of the ocean—atmosphere—land system. Some of the excess carbon dioxide will be absorbed quickly (for example, by the ocean surface), but some will remain in the atmosphere for thousands of years, due in part to the very slow process by which carbon is transferred to ocean sediments. 16 IV. AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT A. Regulatory Setting The proposed project is addressed through the efforts of various international, federal, state, regional, and local government agencies. These agencies work jointly, as well as individually, to improve air quality through legislation, regulations, planning, policy-making, education, and a variety of programs. The agencies responsible for improving the air quality are discussed below. 1. International Montreal Protocol In 1988, the United Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to evaluate the impacts of global climate change and to develop strategies that nations could implement to curtail global climate change. In 1992, the United States joined other countries around the world in signing the United Nations' Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) agreement with the goal of controlling GHG emissions. As a result, the Climate Change Action Plan was developed to address the reduction of GHGs in the United States. The plan consists of more than 50 voluntary programs. Additionally, the Montreal Protocol was originally signed in 1987 and substantially amended in 1990 and 1992. The Montreal Protocol stipulates that the production and consumption of compounds that deplete ozone in the stratosphere—CFCs, halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform—were to be phased out, with the first three by the year 2000 and methyl chloroform by 2005. The Paris Agreement The Paris Agreement entered into force on 4 November 2016, thirty days after the date on which at least 55 Parties to the Convention accounting in total for at least an estimated 55 % of the total global greenhouse gas emissions have deposited their instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the Depositary. The Paris Agreement builds upon the Convention and – for the first time – brings all nations into a common cause to undertake take ambitious efforts to combat climate change and adapt to its effects, with enhanced support to assist developing countries to do so. As such, it charts a new course in the global climate effort. The Paris Agreement's central aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre -industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Additionally, the agreement aims to strengthen the ability of countries to deal with the impacts of climate change. To reach these ambitious goals, appropriate financial flows, a new technology framework and an enhanced capacity building framework will be put in place, thus supporting action by developing countries and the most vulnerable 17 countries, in line with their own national objectives. The Agreement also provides for enhanced transparency of action and support through a more robust transparency framework. 2. Federal - United States Environmental Protection Agency The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for setting and enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for atmospheric pollutants. It regulates emission sources that are under the exclusive authority of the federal government, such as aircraft, ships, and certain locomotives. The National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) pollutants were identified using medical evidence and are shown below in Table 3. The EPA and the California Air Resource Board (CARB) designate air basins where ambient air quality standards are exceeded as "nonattainment" areas. If standards are met, the area is designated as an "attainment" area. If there is inadequate or inconclusive data to make a definitive attainment designation, they are considered "unclassified." National nonattainment areas are further designated as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, or extreme as a function of deviation from standards. Each standard has a different definition, or 'form' of what constitutes attainment, based on specific air quality statistics. For example, the Federal 8 -hour CO standard is not to be exceeded more than once per year; therefore, an area is in attainment of the CO standard if no more than one 8 -hour ambient air monitoring values exceeds the threshold per year. In contrast, the Federal annual PM2.5 standard is met if the three-year average of the annual average PM2.5 concentration is less than or equal to the standard. Attainment status is shown in Table 4. As part of its enforcement responsibilities, the EPA requires each state with federal nonattainment areas to prepare and submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that demonstrates the means to attain the national standards. The State Implementation Plan (SIP) must integrate federal, state, and local components and regulations to identify specific measures to reduce pollution, using a combination of performance standards and market-based programs within the timeframe identified in the State Implementation Plan (SIP). As indicated below in Table 4, the Basin has been designated by the EPA as a non - attainment area for ozone (03) and suspended particulates (PM10 and PM2.5). Currently, the Basin is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide (CO), lead, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). According to the AQMP, in 2011 the Basin exceeded federal standards for either ozone or PM2.5 at one or more locations on a total of 124 days, based on the current federal standards for 8 -hour ozone and 24-hour PM2.5. Despite substantial improvements in air quality over the past few decades, some air monitoring stations in the Basin still exceed the NAAQS for ozone more frequently than any other stations in the U.S. In 2011, three of the top five stations that exceeded the 8 -hour ozone NAAQS were located in the Basin (Central San Bernardino Mountains, East San Bernardino Valley, and Metropolitan Riverside County). 18 PM2.5 in the Basin has improved significantly in recent years, with 2010 and 2011 being the cleanest years on record. In 2011, only one station in the Basin (Metropolitan Riverside County at Mira Loma) exceeded the annual PM2.5 NAAQS and the 98th percentile form of the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, as well as the 3 -year design values for these standards. Basin -wide, the federal PM2.5 24-hour standard level was exceeded in 2011 on 17 sampling days. The Basin is currently in attainment for the federal standards for carbon monoxide (CO), lead, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)• While the concentration level of the new 1 -hour NO2 federal standard (100 ppb) was exceeded in the Basin at two stations (Central Los Angeles and Long Beach) on the same day in 2011, the NAAQS NO2 design value has not been exceeded. Therefore, the Basin remains in attainment of the NO2 NAAQS. The EPA designated the Los Angeles County portion of the Basin as nonattainment for the recently revised (2008) federal lead standard (0.15 pg/m3, rolling 3 -month average), due to the addition of source -specific monitoring under the new federal regulation. This designation was based on two source -specific monitors in Vernon and the City of Industry exceeding the new standard in the 2007-2009 period of data used. In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (Docket No. 05-1120), argued November 29, 2006 and decided April 2, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court held that not only did the EPA have authority to regulate greenhouse gases, but the EPA's reasons for not regulating this area did not fit the statutory requirements. As such, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA should be required to regulate CO2 and other greenhouse gases as pollutants under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). In response to the FY2008 Consolidations Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764; Public Law 110-161), EPA proposed a rule on March 10, 2009 that requires mandatory reporting of GHG emissions from large sources in the United States. On September 22, 2009, the Final Mandatory Reporting of GHG Rule was signed and published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2009. The rule became effective on December 29, 2009. This rule requires suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial GHGs, manufacturers of vehicles and engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of GHG emissions to submit annual reports to EPA. On December 7, 2009, the EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. One is an endangerment finding that finds concentrations of the six GHGs in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. The other is a cause or contribute finding, that finds emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare. These actions will not themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities. However, it is a prerequisite to finalizing the EPA's proposed GHG emission standards for light-duty vehicles, which were jointly proposed by the EPA and Department of Transportation on September 15, 2009. 19 On March 19, 2015, the Whitehouse announced that President Obama will issue an Executive Order that will cut the Federal Government's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 40 percent over the next decade from 2008 levels -- saving taxpayers up to $18 billion in avoided energy costs -- and increase the share of electricity the Federal Government consumes from renewable sources to 30 percent. Complementing this effort, several major Federal suppliers are announcing commitments to cut their own GHG emissions. The Administration hosted a roundtable that brought some of these large Federal suppliers together to discuss the benefits of their GHG reduction targets or to make their first-ever corporate commitments to disclose emissions and set new reduction goals. Together, the combined results of the Federal Government actions and new supplier commitments will reduce GHG emissions by 26 million metric tons by 2025 from 2008 levels, the equivalent of taking nearly 5.5 million cars off the road for a year. And to encourage continued progress across the Federal supply chain, the Administration is releasing a new scorecard to publicly track self-reported emissions disclosure and progress for all major Federal suppliers, who together represent more than $187 billion in Federal spending and account for more than 40 percent of all Federal contract dollars. Since the Federal Government is the single largest consumer of energy in the Nation, Federal emissions reductions and progress across the supply chain will have broad impacts. The new commitments announced today support the United States' international commitment to cut net GHG emissions 26-28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025, which President Obama first announced in November 2014 as part of an historic agreement with China. Additionally, the goals build on the strong progress made by Federal agencies during the first six years of the Administration under President Obama's 2009 Executive Order on Federal Leadership on Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance, including reducing Federal 61-16 emissions by 17 percent — which helped Federal agencies avoid $1.8 billion in cumulative energy costs — and increasing the share of renewable energy consumption to 9 percent.' 3. State — California Air Resources Board The California Air Resources Board (CARB), which is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California. In this capacity, the CARB conducts research, sets the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures, provides oversight of local programs, and prepares the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) for criteria pollutants are shown in Table 3. In addition, the CARB establishes emission standards for motor vehicles sold in California, consumer products (e.g., hairspray, 1 Source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/03/19/fact-sheet-reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions- federal-government-and-acro. 20 aerosol paints, and barbeque lighter fluid), and various types of commercial equipment. It also sets fuel specifications to further reduce vehicular emissions. The South Coast Air Basin has been designated by the CARB as a nonattainment area for ozone, PM10 and PM2.5. Currently, the South Coast Air Basin is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for CO, lead, SO2, NO2, and sulfates and is unclassified for visibility reducing particles and Hydrogen Sulfide. On June 20, 2002, the CARB revised the PM10 annual average standard to 20 µg/m3 and established an annual average standard for PM2.5 of 12 µg/m3. These standards were approved by the Office of Administrative Law in June 2003 and are now effective. On September 27, 2007 CARB approved the South Coast Air Basin and the Coachella Valley 2007 Air Quality Management Plan for Attaining the Federal 8 -hour Ozone and PM2.5 Standards. The plan projects attainment for the 8 -hour Ozone standard by 2024 and the PM2.5 standard by 2015. On December 12, 2008 the CARB adopted Resolution 08-43, which limits NOx, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from on -road diesel truck fleets that operate in California. On October 12, 2009 Executive Order R-09-010 was adopted that codified Resolution 08- 43 into Section 2025, title 13 of the California Code of Regulations. This regulation requires that by the year 2023 all commercial diesel trucks that operate in California shall meet model year 2010 (Tier 4) or latter emission standards. In the interim period, this regulation provides annual interim targets for fleet owners to meet. This regulation also provides a few exemptions including a onetime per year 3 -day pass for trucks registered outside of California. The CARB is also responsible for regulations pertaining to toxic air contaminants. The Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588, 1987, Connelly) was enacted in 1987 as a means to establish a formal air toxics emission inventory risk quantification program. AB 2588, as amended, establishes a process that requires stationary sources to report the type and quantities of certain substances their facilities routinely release into the South Coast Air Basin. The data is ranked by high, intermediate, and low categories, which are determined by: the potency, toxicity, quantity, volume, and proximity of the facility to nearby receptors. The State currently has no regulations that establish ambient air quality standards for GHGs. However, the State has passed laws directing CARB to develop actions to reduce GHG emissions, which are listed below. Assembly Bill 1493 California Assembly Bill 1493 (also known as the Pavley Bill, in reference to its author Fran Pavley) was enacted on July 22, 2002 and required CARB to develop and adopt regulations that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. In 2004, CARB approved the "Pavley I" regulations limiting the amount of GHGs that may be released from new passenger automobiles that are being phased in between model years 2009 through 2016. This regulation will reduce GHG emissions by 30 percent from 2002 levels by 2016. The second set of regulations "Pavley II" is currently in development and will be phased in 21 between model years 2017 through 2025 and will reduce emissions by 45 percent by the year 2020. The Pavley II standards are being developed by linking the GHG emissions and formerly separate toxic tailpipe emissions standards previously known as the "LEV III" (third stage of the Low Emission Vehicle standards) into a single regulatory framework. In 2005, the CARB submitted a "waiver" request to the EPA in order to implement the GHG standards and in March of 2008, the U.S. EPA denied the request. However, in June 2009, the decision was reversed and the U.S. EPA granted California the authority to implement the GHG standards for passenger cars, pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles. In September 2009, the Pavley I regulations were adopted by CARB. Executive Order 5-3-05 The California Governor issued Executive Order 5-3-05, GHG Emission, in June 2005, which established the following reduction targets: ■ 2010: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels ■ 2020: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels ■ 2050: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. The executive order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) to coordinate a multi -agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. To comply with the Executive Order, the secretary of CaIEPA created the California Climate Action Team (CAT), made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The team released its first report in March 2006. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on the voluntary actions of businesses, local governments, and communities and through State incentive and regulatory programs. Assembly Bill 32 In 2006, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires CARB, to adopt rules and regulations that would achieve GHG emissions equivalent to statewide levels in 1990 by 2020 through an enforceable statewide emission cap which will be phased in starting in 2012. Emission reductions shall include carbon sequestration projects that would remove carbon from the atmosphere and best management practices that are technologically feasible and cost effective. On December 6, 2007 CARB released the calculated Year 1990 GHG emissions of 427 million metric tons of CO2e (MMTCO2e). The 2020 target of 427 MMTCO2e requires the reduction of 169 MMTCO2e, or approximately 30 percent from the State's projected 2020 business as usual emissions of 596 MMTCO2e and the reduction of 42 MMTCO2e, or almost 10 percent from the 2002-2004 average GHG emissions. Under AB 32, CARB was required to adopt regulations by January 1, 2011 to achieve reductions in GHGs to meet the 1990 cap by 2020. Early measures CARB took to lower GHG emissions included 22 requiring operators of the largest industrial facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons of CO2 in a calendar year to submit verification of GHG emissions by December 1, 2010. The CARB Board also approved nine discrete early action measures that include regulations affecting landfills, motor vehicle fuels, refrigerants in cars, port operations and other sources that became enforceable on or before January 1, 2010. On December 11, 2008 the CARB Board approved a Scoping Plan, with final adoption May 11, 2009 that proposed a variety of measures including direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non -monetary incentives, voluntary actions, a market-based cap -and -trade system, and a fee regulation to fund the program. In current pending litigation, Association of Irritated Residents v. California Air Resources Board, a California State trial court found that the analysis of the alternatives identified in the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document (FED) was not sufficient for informed decision-making and public review under CEQA. In response, CARB has appealed the decision. In addition, CARB prepared the Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document, June 13, 2011. On August 24, 2011 CARB recertified the complete AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Environmental Document revised by the Final Supplement. In December, 2011 the Final Supplement was accepted as sufficient to fulfill the trial court's March order. While local government operations were not accounted for in achieving the 2020 emissions reduction, local land use changes are estimated to result in a reduction of 5 metric tons of CO2e, which is approximately 3 percent of the 2020 GHG emissions reduction goal. In recognition of the critical role local governments will play in successful implementation of AB 32, CARB is recommending GHG reduction goals of 15 percent of 2010 levels by 2020 to ensure that municipal and community -wide emissions match the state's reduction target. According to the Measure Documentation Supplement to the Scoping Plan, local government actions and targets are anticipated to reduce vehicle miles by approximately 2 percent through land use planning, resulting in a potential GHG reduction of 2 metric tons of CO2e (or approximately 1.2 percent of the GHG reduction target). In May 2014, CARB released its First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan (CARB 2014). This Update identifies the next steps for California's leadership on climate change. While California continues on its path to meet the near-term 2020 greenhouse gas limit, it must also set a clear path toward long-term, deep GHG emission reductions. This report highlights California's success to date in reducing its GHG emissions and lays the foundation for establishing a broad framework for continued emission reductions beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. On January 20, 2017, CARB announced its release of a proposed plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 — the most ambitious target in North America. The plan builds on the state's successful 23 efforts to reduce emissions and outlines the most effective ways to reach the 2030 goal, including continuing California's Cap -and -Trade Program. The Final 2017 Scoping Plan Update will be released in late March and be considered for approval by the Board in late April. Senate Bill 1368 Senate Bill 1368 (SB 1368) is the companion Bill of AB 32 and was adopted September, 2006. SB 1368 requires the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to establish a performance standard for baseload generation of GHG emissions by investor-owned utilities by February 1, 2007 and for local publicly owned utilities by June 30, 2007. These standards could not exceed the GHG emissions rate from a baseload combined -cycle, natural gas-fired plant. Furthermore, the legislation states that all electricity provided to the State, including imported electricity, must be generated by plants that meet the standards set by California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and California Energy Commission (CEC). Executive Order S-1-07 Executive Order 5-1-07 was issued in 2007 and proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in the State, since it generates more than 40 percent of the State's GHG emissions. It establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in the State by at least ten percent by 2020. This Order also directs CARB to determine whether this Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could be adopted as a discrete early -action measure as part of the effort to meet the mandates in AB 32. On April 23, 2009 CARB approved the proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard. The low carbon fuel standard is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions by about 16 MMT per year by 2020. The low carbon fuel standard Is designed to provide a framework that uses market mechanisms to spur the steady introduction of lower carbon fuels. The framework establishes performance standards that fuel producers and importers must meet each year beginning in 2011. Separate standards are established for gasoline and diesel fuels and the alternative fuels that can replace each. The standards are "back- loaded", with more reductions required in the last five years, than the first five years. This schedule allows for the development of advanced fuels that are lower in carbon than today's fuels and the market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, and flexible fuel vehicles. It is anticipated that compliance with the low carbon fuel standard will be based on a combination of both lower carbon fuels and more efficient vehicles. Reformulated gasoline mixed with corn -derived ethanol at ten percent by volume and low sulfur diesel fuel represent the baseline fuels. Lower carbon fuels may be ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, or blends of these fuels with gasoline or diesel as appropriate. Compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas also may be low carbon fuels. Hydrogen and electricity, when used in fuel 24 cells or electric vehicles are also considered as low carbon fuels for the low carbon fuel standard. Senate Bill 97 Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was adopted August 2007 and acknowledges that climate change is a prominent environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA. SB 97 directed the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR), which is part of the State Resource Agency, to prepare, develop, and transmit to CARB guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions, as required by CEQA, by July 1, 2009. The Resources Agency was required to certify and adopt those guidelines by January 1, 2010. Pursuant to the requirements of SB 97 as stated above, on December 30, 2009 the Natural Resources Agency adopted amendments to the state CEQA guidelines that address GHG emissions. The CEQA Guidelines Amendments changed 14 sections of the CEQA Guidelines and incorporate GHG language throughout the Guidelines. However, no GHG emissions thresholds of significance are provided and no specific mitigation measures are identified. The GHG emission reduction amendments went into effect on March 18, 2010 and are summarized below: ■ Climate action plans and other greenhouse gas reduction plans can be used to determine whether a project has significant impacts, based upon its compliance with the plan. ■ Local governments are encouraged to quantify the greenhouse gas emissions of proposed projects, noting that they have the freedom to select the models and methodologies that best meet their needs and circumstances. The section also recommends consideration of several qualitative factors that may be used in the determination of significance, such as the extent to which the given project complies with state, regional, or local GHG reduction plans and policies. OPR does not set or dictate specific thresholds of significance. Consistent with existing CEQA Guidelines, OPR encourages local governments to develop and publish their own thresholds of significance for GHG impacts assessment. ■ When creating their own thresholds of significance, local governments may consider the thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts. ■ New amendments include guidelines for determining methods to mitigate the effects of greenhouse gas emissions in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. ■ OPR is clear to state that "to qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must be identified and incorporated into the project; general compliance with a plan, by itself, is not mitigation." ■ OPR's emphasizes the advantages of analyzing GHG impacts on an institutional, programmatic level. OPR therefore approves tiering of environmental analyses and highlights some benefits of such an approach. 25 ■ Environmental impact reports (EIRs) must specifically consider a project's energy use and energy efficiency potential. Senate Bills 1078, 107, and X1-2 and Executive Orders 5-14-08 and 5-21-09 Senate Bill 1078 (SB 1078) requires retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned utilities and community choice aggregators, to provide at least 20 percent of their supply from renewable sources by 2017. Senate Bill 107 (SB 107) changed the target date to 2010. Executive Order S-14-08 was signed on November 2008 and expands the State's Renewable Energy Standard to 33 percent renewable energy by 2020. Executive Order S-21-09 directed CARB to adopt regulations by July 31, 2010 to enforce 5-14-08. Senate Bill X1-2 codifies the 33 percent renewable energy requirement by 2020. Senate Bill 375 Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 and aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or alternate planning strategy (APS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). CARB, in consultation with each MPO, will provide each affected region with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. CARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO's sustainable communities strategy or alternate planning strategy for consistency with its assigned targets. The proposed project is located within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which has authority to develop the SCS or APS. For the SCAG region, the targets set by CARB are at eight percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2020 and 13 percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2035. On April 4, 2012, SCAG adopted the 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), which meets the CARB emission reduction requirements. The Housing Element Update is required by the State to be completed within 18 months after RTP/SCS adoption or by October 2013. City and County land use policies, including General Plans, are not required to be consistent with the RTP and associated SCS or APS. However, new provisions of CEQA would incentivize, through streamlining and other provisions, qualified projects that are consistent with an approved SCS or APS and categorized as "transit priority projects." Senate Bill X7-7 Senate Bill X7-7 (SB X7-7), enacted on November 9, 2009, mandates water conservation targets and efficiency improvements for urban and agricultural water suppliers. SB X7-7 requires the Department of Water Resources (DWR) 26 to develop a task force and technical panel to develop alternative best management practices for the water sector. In addition SB X7-7 required the DWR to develop criteria for baseline uses for residential, commercial, and industrial uses for both indoor and landscaped area uses. The DWR was also required to develop targets and regulations that achieve a statewide 20 percent reduction in water usage. Assembly Bill 939 and Senate Bill 1374 Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939) requires that each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills, whether through waste reduction, recycling or other means. Senate Bill 1374 (SB 1374) requires the California Integrated Waste Management Board to adopt a model ordinance by March 1, 2004 suitable for adoption by any local agency to require 50 to 75 percent diversion of construction and demolition of waste materials from landfills. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6 CCR Title 24, Part 6: California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24) were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. Although it was not originally intended to reduce GHG emissions, electricity production by fossil fuels results in GHG emissions and energy efficient buildings require less electricity. Therefore, increased energy efficiency results in decreased GHG emissions. The Energy Commission adopted 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008 and Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. These updates became effective on August 1, 2009. 2013 Standards have been approved and became effective July 1, 2014. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11 All buildings for which an application for a building permit is submitted on or after January 1, 2014 must follow the 2013 standards. The 2013 commercial standards are estimated to be 30 percent more efficient than the 2008 standards; residential standards are 25 percent more efficient. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. California Green Building Standards On January 12, 2010, the State Building Standards Commission unanimously adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code, which went into effect on January 1, 2011. The Code is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial and school buildings. CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (Title 24) became effective in 2001 in response to continued efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. CCR Title 24, Part 11 now require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building 27 system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant -emitting finish materials. One focus of CCR Title 24, Part 11 is water conservation measures, which reduce GHG emissions by reducing electrical consumption associated with pumping and treating water. CCR Title 24, Part 11 has approximately 52 nonresidential mandatory measures and an additional 130 provisions for optional use. Some key mandatory measures for commercial occupancies include specified parking for clean air vehicles, a 20 percent reduction of potable water use within buildings, a 50 percent construction waste diversion from landfills, use of building finish materials that emit low levels of volatile organic compounds, and commissioning for new, nonresidential buildings over 10,000 square feet. The California Greed Building Standards Code does not prevent a local jurisdiction from adopting a more stringent code as state law provides methods for local enhancements. The Code recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction and demolition ordinances, and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they provide a minimum 50 -percent diversion requirement. The code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction and demolition recycling infrastructure. State building code provides the minimum standard that buildings need to meet in order to be certified for occupancy. Enforcement is generally through the local building official. Executive Order B-30-15 Executive Order B-30-15, establishing a new interim statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, was signed by Governor Brown in April 2015. Executive Order B-29-15 Executive Order B-29-15, mandates a statewide 25% reduction in potable water usage. EO B-29-15 signed into law on April 1, 2015. Executive Order B-37-16 Executive Order B-29-15, continuing the State's adopted water reductions, was signed into law on May 9, 2016. The water reductions build off the mandatory 25% percent reduction called for in EO B-29-15. 4. Regional South Coast Air Quality Management District The SCAQMD develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources, inspects emission sources, and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. The SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of AQMPs. On June 30, 2016, the SCAQMD released its Draft 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP is a regional blueprint for achieving the federal air quality standards and healthful air. The 2016 AQMP includes both stationary and mobile source strategies to ensure that rapidly F approaching attainment deadlines are met, that public health is protected to the maximum extent feasible, and that the region is not faced with burdensome sanctions if the Plan is not approved or if the NAAQS are not met on time. As with every AQMP, a comprehensive analysis of emissions, meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, regional growth projections, and the impact of existing control measures is updated with the latest data and methods. The most significant air quality challenge in the Basin is to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions sufficiently to meet the upcoming ozone standard deadlines. A revised draft of the 2012 AQMP was released on September, 2012, and was adopted by the SCAQMD Board on December 7, 2012. The 2012 AQMP is now awaiting approval from CARB and the U.S. EPA. The 2012 AQMP is being prepared in order to meet the federal Clean Air Act requirement that all 24-hour PM2.5 non - attainment areas prepare a SIP, which was required to be submitted to the U.S. EPA by December 14, 2012 and demonstrate attainment with the 24-hour PM2.5 standard by 2014. The 2012 AQMP demonstrates attainment of the federal 24-hour PM2.5 standard by 2014 in the Basin through adoption of all feasible measures, and therefore, no extension of the attainment date is needed. The 2007 AQMP demonstrated attainment with the 1997 8 -hour ozone (80 ppb) standard by 2023, through implementation of future improvements in control techniques and technologies. These "black box" emissions reductions represent 65 percent of the remaining NOx emission reductions by 2023 in order to show attainment with the 1997 8 -hour ozone NAAQS. Given the magnitude of these needed emissions reductions, additional NOx control measures have been provided in this AQMP even though the primary purpose of this AQMP is to show compliance with 24-hour PM2.5 emissions standards. The 2012 AQMP is designed to satisfy the California Clean Air Act's (CCAA) emission reductions of 5 percent per year or adoption of all feasible measures requirements and fulfill the EPA's requirement to update transportation conformity emissions budgets based on the latest approved motor vehicle emissions model and planning assumptions. The 2012 AQMP updates and revises the previous 2007 AQMP. The 2012 AQMP was prepared to comply with the Federal and State CCAA and amendments, to accommodate growth, to reduce the high pollutant levels in the Basin, to meet Federal and State ambient air quality standards, and to minimize the fiscal impact that pollution control measures have on the local economy. The purpose of the 2012 AQMP for the Basin is to set forth a comprehensive program that will lead this area into com24pliance with all federal and state air-quality planning requirements. The 2012 AQMP builds upon the approaches taken in the 2007 AQMP for the attainment of federal PM and ozone standards, and highlights the significant amount of reductions needed and the need to engage in interagency coordinated planning of mobile sources to meet all of the federal criteria pollutant standards. Compared with the 2007 AQMP, the 2012 AQMP utilizes revised emissions inventory projections that use 2008 as the base year. On -road emissions are calculated using CARB EMFAC2011 emission factors and the transportation activity data provided by SCAG from their 29 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (2012 RTP). Off-road emissions were updated using CARB's 2011 In -Use Off -Road Fleet Inventory Model. Since the 2007 AQMP was finalized new area source categories such as LPG transmission losses, storage tank and pipeline cleaning and degassing, and architectural colorants, were created and included in the emissions inventories. The 2012 AQMP also includes analysis of several additional sources of GHG emissions such as landfills and could also assist in reaching the GHG target goals in the AB32 Scoping Plan. The control measures in the 2012 AQMP consist of three components: 1) Basin -wide and episodic short-term PM2.5 measures; 2) Section 182(e)(5) implementation measures; and 3) Transportation control measures. Many of the control measures are not based on command and control regulations, but instead focus on incentives, outreach, and education to bring about emissions reductions through voluntary participation and behavioral changes. More broadly, a transition to zero- and near - zero emission technologies is necessary to meet 2023 and 2032 air quality standards and 2050 climate goals. Many of the same technologies will address both air quality and climate needs. During construction and operation, the project must comply with applicable rules and regulations. The following are rules the project may be required to comply with, either directly, or indirectly: SCAQMD Rule 402 prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. SCAQMD Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction and operation activities. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Management Practices, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites. Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 403 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off-site. Applicable dust suppression techniques from Rule 403 are summarized below. Implementation of these dust suppression techniques can reduce the fugitive dust generation (and thus the PMlo component). Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. Rule 403 measures may include but are not limited to the following: 30 ■ Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more). ■ Water active sites at least three times daily. (Locations where grading is to occur will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving.) ■ Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, or maintain at least 0.6 meters (2 feet) of freeboard (vertical space between the top of the load and top of the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code section 23114. ■ Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph) or less. ■ Suspension of all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous wind gusts) exceed 25 mph. ■ Bumper strips or similar best management practices shall be provided where vehicles enter and exit the construction site onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. ■ Replanting disturbed areas as soon as practical. ■ During all construction activities, construction contractors shall sweep on-site and off-site streets if silt is carried to adjacent public thoroughfares, to reduce the amount of particulate matter on public streets. All sweepers shall be compliant with SCAQMD Rule 1186.1, Less Polluting Sweepers. SCAQMD Rule 445 prohibits permanently installed wood burning devices into any new development. A wood burning device means any fireplace, wood burning heater, or pellet -fueled wood heater, or any similarly enclosed, permanently installed, indoor or outdoor device burning any solid fuel for aesthetic or space -heating purposes, which has a heat input of less than one million British thermal units per hour. SCAQMD Rule 481 applies to all spray painting and spray coating operations and equipment. The rule states that a person shall not use or operate any spray painting or spray coating equipment unless one of the following conditions is met: (1) The spray coating equipment is operated inside a control enclosure, which is approved by the Executive Officer. Any control enclosure for which an application for permit for new construction, alteration, or change of ownership or location is submitted after the date of adoption of this rule shall be exhausted only through filters at a design face velocity not less than 100 feet per minute nor greater than 300 feet per minute, or through a water wash system designed to be equally effective for the purpose of air pollution control. 31 (2) Coatings are applied with high-volume low-pressure, electrostatic and/or airless spray equipment. (3) An alternative method of coating application or control is used which has effectiveness equal to or greater than the equipment specified in the rule. SCAQMD Rule 1108 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of asphalt and limits the volatile organic compound (VOC) content in asphalt used in the South Coast Air Basin. This rule would regulate the VOC content of asphalt used during construction. Therefore, all asphalt used during construction of the project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1108. .crAQMD Rule 1i In order to assist local agencies with direction on GHG emissions, the SCAQMD organized a working group and adopted Rules 2700, 2701, 2702, and 3002 which are described below. Rules 2700 and 2701 The SCAQMD adopted Rules 2700 and 2701 on December 5, 2008, which establishes the administrative structure for a voluntary program designed to quantify GHG emission reductions. Rule 2701 provides specific protocols for private parties to follow to generate certified GHG emission reductions for projects within the district. Approved protocols include forest projects, urban tree planting, and manure management. The SCAQMD is currently developing additional protocols for other reduction measures. For a GHG emission reduction project to qualify, it must be verified and certified by the SCAQMD Executive Officer, who has 60 days to approve or deny the Plan. Upon approval of the Plan, the Executive Officer issues required to issue a certified receipt of the GHG emission reductions within 90 days. Rule 2702 The SCAQMD adopted Rule 2702 on February 6, 2009, which establishes a voluntary air quality investment program from which SCAQMD can collect funds from parties that desire certified GHG emission reductions, pool those funds, and use them to purchase or fund GHG emission reduction projects within two years, unless extended by the Governing Board. Priority will be given to projects that result in co -benefit emission reductions of GHG emissions and criteria or toxic air pollutants within environmental justice areas. Further, this voluntary program may compete with the cap -and -trade program identified for implementation in CARB's Scoping Plan, or a Federal cap and trade program. Rule 3002 The SCAQMD amended Rule 3002 on November 5, 2010 to include facilities that emit greater than 100,000 tons per year of CO2e are required to apply for a Title V permit by July 1, 2011. A Title V permit is for facilities that are considered major sources of emissions. Although the SCAQMD is responsible for regional air quality planning efforts, it does not have the authority to directly regulate air quality issues associated with plans and new development projects throughout the South Coast Air Basin. Instead, this is controlled through local jurisdictions in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In order to assist local jurisdictions with air quality compliance issues the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook), prepared by the SCAQMD, 1993, with the most current updates found at http://www.agmd.gov/cega/hdbk.html, was developed in accordance with the projections and programs of the AQMP. The purpose of the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook is to assist Lead Agencies, as well as consultants, project proponents, and other interested parties in evaluating a proposed project's potential air quality impacts. Specifically, the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook explains the procedures that the SCAQMD recommends be followed for the environmental review process required by CEQA. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook provides direction on how to evaluate potential air quality impacts, how to determine whether these impacts are significant, and how 33 to mitigate these impacts. The SCAQMD intends that by providing this guidance, the air quality impacts of plans and development proposals will be analyzed accurately and consistently throughout the South Coast Air Basin, and adverse impacts will be minimized. SCAQMD Stakeholder Working Group Since neither CARB nor the OPR has developed GHG emissions threshold, the SCAQMD formed a Working Group to develop significance thresholds related to GHG emissions. At the September 28, 2010 Working Group meeting, the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that provides a quantitative annual thresholds of 10,000 MTCO2e for industrial uses. Southern California Association of Governments The SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino and Imperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development and the environment. SCAG is the Federally designated MPO for the majority of the southern California region and is the largest MPO in the nation. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the Regional Transportation Plan and Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP), which addresses regional development and growth forecasts. These plans form the basis for the land use and transportation components of the AQMP, which are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and in the consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The Regional Transportation Plan, Regional Transportation Improvement Plan, and AQMP are based on projections originating within the City and County General Plans. 5. Local — City of Costa Mesa Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Costa Mesa, have the authority and responsibility to reduce air pollution through its police power and decision-making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for the assessment and mitigation of air emissions resulting from its land use decisions. The City is also responsible for the implementation of transportation control measures as outlined in the 2007 and 2012 AQMPs. Examples of such measures include bus turnouts, energy-efficient streetlights, and synchronized traffic signals. In accordance with CEQA requirements and the CEQA review process, the City assesses the air quality impacts of new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by conditioning discretionary permits, and monitors and enforces implementation of such mitigation. In accordance with the CEQA requirements, the City does not, however, have the expertise to develop plans, programs, procedures, and methodologies to ensure that air quality within the City and region will meet federal and state standards. Instead, the County relies on the expertise of the SCAQMD and utilizes the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook as the guidance document for the environmental review of plans and development proposals within its jurisdiction. 34 The Conservation Element of the City of Costa Mesa 2015-2035 General Plan summarizes air quality issues in the Basin, air quality -related plans and programs administered by federal, state, and special purpose agencies, and establishes goals and policies to improve air quality. These goals and policies in the Conservation Element include: GOAL CON -1 It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its citizens with a high quality environment through the conservation of resources, including land, water, wildlife, and vegetation; the protection of areas of unique natural beauty; the integration of natural features into the man-made environment. GOAL CON -2 Reduce the City's carbon footprints and manage resources wisely to meet the needs of a growing population and economy. Base community planning decisions on sustainable practices that reduce environmental pollutants, conserve resources, and minimize waste. Encourage the design of energy-efficient buildings, use renewable energy, and promote alternative methods of transportation. Objective CON -2.A Work towards the conservation of energy resources in both existing and new buildings, utilities and infrastructure. CON -2.A.1 Promote efficient use of energy and conservation of available resources in the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of public and private facilities, infrastructure, and equipment. CON -2.A.6 Encourage construction and building development practices that reduce resource expenditures throughout the lifecycle of a structure. CON -2.A.7 Continue to require all City facilities and services to incorporate energy and resource conservation standards and practices and require that new municipal facilities be built within the LEED Gold standards or equivalent. CON -2.A.9 Encourage waste management programs that promote waste reduction and recycling to minimize materials sent to landfills. Maintain robust programs encourage residents and businesses to reduce, reuse, recycle, and compost. CON -2.A.10 Continue construction and demolition programs that require recycling and minimize waste in haul trips. 35 GOAL CON -4 Take steps to improve and maintain air quality for the benefit of the health and vitality of residents and the local economy. In alignment with State emissions reduction goals and in cooperation with the South Coast Air Quality Management District, pursue regional collaboration to reduce emissions from all sources. Obiective CON -4.A Pursue the prevention of the significant deterioration of local and regional air quality. CON -4.A.1 Support regional policies and efforts that improve air quality to protect human and environmental health, and minimize disproportionate impacts on sensitive population groups. CON -4.A.2 Encourage businesses, industries and residents to reduce the impact of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of stationary and non -stationary pollution sources. CON -4.A.3 Require that sensitive uses such as schools, childcare centers, parks and playgrounds, housing, and community gathering places are protected from adverse impacts of emissions. CON -4.A.4 Continue to participate in regional planning efforts with the Southern California Association of Governments, nearby jurisdictions, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District to meet or exceed air quality standards. CON -4.A.5 Encourage compact development, infill development, and a mix of uses that are in proximity to transit, pedestrian, and bicycling infrastructures. CON -4.A.6 Enhance bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support public bus service, pursuant to the Circulation Element's goals, objectives, and policies. CON -4.A.7 Encourage installation of renewable energy devices for businesses and facilities and strive to reduce communitywide energy consumption. CON -4.A.8 Develop long-term, community -wide strategies and programs that work at the local level to reduce greenhouse gases and Costa Mesa's "carbon footprint". 36 B. Monitored Air Quality The air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air basin. Estimates of the existing emissions in the Basin provided in the Revised Draft 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, prepared by SCAQMD, September 2012, indicate that collectively, mobile sources account for 59 percent of the VOC, 88 percent of the NOx emissions and 40 percent of directly emitted PM2.5, with another 10 percent of PM2.5 from road dust. The SCAQMD has divided the South Coast Air Basin into 38 air -monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The project site is located in North Coastal Orange County Air Monitoring Area (Source Receptor Area 18), which is located in Los Angeles and Orange Counties and covers the area south of the 101 freeway running along the coast to just north of Laguna Niguel. The nearest air monitoring station to the project site is the Costa Mesa - Mesa Verde Drive Monitoring Station (Costa Mesa Station). The Costa Mesa Station is located approximately 2.2 miles north of the project site at 2850 Mesa Verde Dr East, Costa Mesa. In order to get all necessary data, a second air monitoring station, Anaheim- Pampas Lane Monitoring Station (Anaheim Station), was used. The Anaheim Station is located approximately 13.02 miles north of the project site at 1630 W Pampas Lane, Anaheim. Table 5 presents the monitored pollutant levels from the Costa Mesa Station. However, it should be noted that due to the air monitoring station distance from the project site, recorded air pollution levels at the air monitoring station reflect with varying degrees of accuracy, local air quality conditions at the project site. The monitoring data presented in Table 5 shows that ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) are the air pollutants of primary concern in the project area, which are detailed below. Where state and federal emissions are exceeded, the values have been bolded. Ozone During the 2013 to 2015 monitoring period, the State 1 -hour concentration standard for ozone has been exceeded one day each year at the Costa Mesa Station. The Federal 8 -hour ozone standard was exceeded between two and six days each year over the past three years at the Costa Mesa Station. Ozone is a secondary pollutant as it is not directly emitted. Ozone is the result of chemical reactions between other pollutants, most importantly hydrocarbons and NO2, which occur only in the presence of bright sunlight. Pollutants emitted from upwind cities react during transport downwind to produce the oxidant concentrations experienced in the area. Many areas of the SCAQMD contribute to the ozone levels experienced at the monitoring station, with the more significant areas being those directly upwind. Carbon Monoxide CO is another important pollutant that is due mainly to motor vehicles. The Costa Mesa Station did not record an exceedance of the state or federal 1 -hour or 8 -hour CO standards for the last three years. 37 Nitrogen Dioxide The Anaheim Station did not record an exceedance of the State or Federal NO2 standards for the last three years. Particulate Matter During the 2013 to 2015 monitoring period, the State 24-hour concentration standards for PM10 have been exceeded between one and two days each year at the Anaheim Station. Over the past three years the Federal 24-hour standard for PM10 has not been exceeded at the Costa Mesa Station. The Federal 24 hour standard for PM2.5 was exceeded between one and four days each year at the Anaheim Station. There does not appear to be a noticeable trend for PM10 or PM2.5 in either her maximum particulate concentrations Or days Uf eXCeeddflCes in the dred. Particulate levels in the area are due to natural sources, grading operations, and motor vehicles. According to the EPA, some people are much more sensitive than others to breathing fine particles (PM10 and PM2.5). People with influenza, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and the elderly may suffer worsening illness and premature death due to breathing these fine particles. People with bronchitis can expect aggravated symptoms from breathing in fine particles. Children may experience decline in lung function due to breathing in PM10 and PM2.5. Other groups considered sensitive are smokers and people who cannot breathe well through their noses. Exercising athletes are also considered sensitive, because many breathe through their mouths during exercise. 38 Table 3 State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards ' Source:http://www.arb.ca.zov/research/aaas/aags2.pdf. 39 Concentration/ Averaging Time California Federal Primary Air Pollutant Standards Standards Most Relevant Effects (a) Pulmonary function decrements and localized lung edema in humans and animals; (b) Risk to public health implied by alterations in pulmonary morphology and host defense in animals; (c) Increased mortality risk; (d) Risk to public health Ozone (03) 0.09 ppm/1-hour 0.070 ppm/8-hour implied by altered connective tissue metabolism and altered pulmonary 0.07 ppm/8-hour morphology in animals after long-term exposures and pulmonary function decrements in chronically exposed humans; (e) Vegetation damage; (f) Property damage. (a) Aggravation of angina pectoris and other aspects of coronary heart disease; (b) Carbon 20.0 ppm/1-hour 35.0 ppm/1-hour Decreased exercise tolerance in persons with peripheral vascular disease and lung Monoxide 9.0 ppm/8-hour 9.0 ppm/8-hour disease; (c) Impairment of central nervous system functions; (d) Possible increased (CO) risk to fetuses. (a) Potential to aggravate chronic respiratory disease and respiratory symptoms in Nitrogen 0.18 ppm/1-hour 100 ppb/1-hour sensitive groups; (b) Risk to public health implied by pulmonary and extra - Dioxide 0.03 ppm/annual 0.053 ppm/annual pulmonary biochemical and cellular changes and pulmonary structural changes; (c) (NO2) Contribution to atmospheric discoloration. Sulfur (a) Bronchoconstriction accompanied by symptoms which may include wheezing, Dioxide 0.25 ppm/1-hour 75 ppb/1-hour shortness of breath and chest tightness, during exercise or physical activity in (SOz) 0.04 ppm/24-hour 0.14 ppm/24-hour persons with asthma. Suspended Particulate 50 µg/m3/24-hour 150 µg/m3/24-hour Matter Matto) 20 µg/m3/annual (PMcardiovascular (a) Exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patients with respiratory or disease; (b) Declines in pulmonary function growth in children; (c) Suspended Increased risk of premature death from heart or lung diseases in elderly. Particulate 3 12 µg/m /annual 35 µg/m3/24-hour Matter 12 µg/m3/annual (PM2.$) (a) Decrease in ventilatory function; (b) Aggravation of asthmatic symptoms; (c ) Sulfates 25 µg/m3/24-hour No Federal Standards Aggravation of cardio -pulmonary disease; (d) Vegetation damage; (e) Degradation of visibility; (f) property damage. 1.5 µg/m3/3- month (a) Learning disabilities; (b) Impairment of blood formation and nerve conduction. Lead 3 1.5 µg/m /30 -day rolling Extinction coefficient of 0.23 Visibility per kilometer - Reducing visibility of 10 miles No Federal Standards Visibility impairment on days when relative humidity is less than 70 percent. Particles or more due to particles when humidity is less than 70 percent. ' Source:http://www.arb.ca.zov/research/aaas/aags2.pdf. 39 Table 4 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status Pollutant State Status' National Status' Ozone Nonattainment Nonattainment (Extreme) Carbon monoxide Attainment Attainment/Unclassified Nitrogen dioxide Attainment Attainment/Unclassified Sulfur dioxide Attainment Attainment/Unclassified PM10 Nonattainment Attainment (Maintenance) PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment (Moderate) 1 Source of State status: California Air Resources Board 2015. z Source of National status: http://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbk/index.html and CARB 2015. 40 Table 5 Local Area Air Quality Levels from the Costa Mesa Air Monitoring Station' Pollutant (Standard )2 2013 Year 2014 2015 Ozone: Maximum 1 -Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.095 0.096 0.099 Days > CAAQS (0.09 ppm) 1 1 1 Maximum 8 -Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.083 0.079 0.079 Days > NAAQS (0.070 ppm) 2 6 2 Carbon Monoxide: Maximum 8 -Hour Concentration (ppm)4 2 1.9 2.2 Days > NAAQS (9 ppm) 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide:a Maximum 1 -Hour Concentration (ppb) 75.7 60.6 52.4 Days > NAAQS (0.25 ppm) 0 0 0 Inhalable Particulates (PM10):3 Maximum 24 -Hour Concentration (ug/m) 77.0 85.0 59.0 Days > NAAQS (150 ug/m3) 0 0 0 Days > CAAQS (50 ug/m3) 1 2 2 Annual Average (ug/m3) 25.4 26.8 25.5 Ultra -Fine Particulates (PM2.5):3 Maximum 24 -Hour Concentration (ug/m3) 47.7 46.5 53.8 Days > NAAQS (35 ug/m3) 1 4 3 Annual Average (ug/m3) 10.1 16.1 14.8 Annual > NAAQS (15 ug/m3) no yes yes Annual > CAAQS (12 ug/m3) no yes yes ' Source: http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/ Unless otherwise noted, data taken from the Costa Mesa - Mesa Verde Drive Monitoring Station 2 CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standard; NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standard; ppm = parts per million 3 Data taken from the Anaheim - Pampas Lane Monitoring Station 4 Source: http://www.agmd.gov/home/library/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year for SRA 18 * Insufficient data available to determine value. 41 V. AIR QUALITY STANDARDS A. Regional Air Quality Many air quality impacts that derive from dispersed mobile sources, which are the dominate pollution generators in the basin, often occurs hours later and miles away after photochemical processes have converted primary exhaust pollutants into secondary contaminants such as ozone. The incremental regional air quality impact of an individual project is generally very small and difficult to measure. Therefore, the SCAQMD has developed significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not ntiantifiahle nn a regional scale. The SCAQMD CECIA Handbook states that any prnjort in the South Coast Air Basin with daily emissions that exceed any of the identified significance thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. For the purposes to this air quality impact analysis, a regional air quality impact would be considered significant if emissions exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds identified in Table 6. B. Local Air Quality Project -related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the South Coast Air Basin. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the project -related air emissions in the project vicinity. The SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significant Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), June 2003, which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The Localized Significant Threshold Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The significance thresholds for the local emissions of NO2 and CO are determined by subtracting the highest background concentration from the last three years of these pollutants from Table 5 above, from the most restrictive ambient air quality standards for these pollutants outlined in the Localized Significant Thresholds. Table 6 shows the Localized Significant Thresholds for NO2, CO, and PM10 and PM2.5. C. Toxic Air Contaminants Construction The construction equipment would emit DPM, which is a carcinogen. However, the DPM emissions are short-term in nature. Determination of risk from DPM is considered over a 30 -year exposure period because carcinogenic risk is directly related to sustain exposure. In contrast, construction activities would be limited to a period of approximately 2 years. Thus, duration of construction activities would represent a fraction of the 30 -year exposure period used as the basis for assessing the significance of carcinogenic risk exposure and, therefore, would not represent a source of sustained DPM emissions. Therefore, considering the short time frame, exposure to DPM is anticipated to be less than significant. [AK Operation The project proposes a 22,860 square foot library, improvements to an existing park, and the renovation and expansion of an existing library into a 9,281 square foot Neighborhood Community Center. The project will not be a source of toxic air contaminants and sensitive receptors would not be exposed to toxic sources of air pollution. D. Odor Impacts The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that an odor impact would occur if the proposed project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402, which states: "A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals." If the proposed project results in a violation of Rule 402 with regards to odor impacts, then the proposed project would create a significant odor impact. E. Greenhouse Gases The CEQA Guidelines recommend that a lead agency consider the following when assessing the significance of impacts from GHG emissions on the environment: ■ The extent to which the project may increase (or reduce) GHG emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting; ■ Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project; ■ The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement an adopted statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissionS2. 1. Regional - South Coast Air Quality Management District The project is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). z The Governor's Office of Planning and Research recommendations include a requirement that such a plan must be adopted through a public review process and include specific requirements that reduce or mitigate the project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions. If there is substantial evidence that the possible effects of a particular project are still cumulatively considerable, notwithstanding compliance with the adopted regulations or requirements, an EIR must be prepared for the project. 43 SCAQMD Regulation XXVII, Climate Change. SCAQMD Regulation XXVII currently includes three rules: ■ The purpose of Rule 2700 is to define terms and post global warming potentials. ■ The purpose of Rule 2701, SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange, is to establish a voluntary program to encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified greenhouse gas emission reductions in the SCAQMD. ■ Rule 2702, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program, was adopted on February 6, 2009. The purpose of this rule is to create a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program for greenhouse gas emission reductions in the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties. A variety of agencies have developed greenhouse gas emission thresholds and/or have made recommendations for how to identify a threshold. However, the thresholds for projects in the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD remain in flux. The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association explored a variety of threshold approaches, but did not recommend one approach (2008). The ARB recommended approaches for setting interim significance thresholds (California Air Resources Board 2008b), in which a draft industrial project threshold suggests that non -transportation related emissions under 7,000 MTCO2e per year would be less than significant; however, the ARB has not approved those thresholds and has not published anything since then. The SCAQMD is in the process of developing thresholds, as discussed below. SCAQMD Threshold Development. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted an interim greenhouse gas significance threshold for stationary sources, rules, and plans where the SCAQMD is lead agency (SCAQMD permit threshold). The SCAQMD permit threshold consists of five tiers. However, the SCAQMD is not the lead agency for this project. I herefore, the five permit threshold tiers do not apply to the proposed project. The SCAQMD is in the process of preparing recommended significance thresholds for greenhouse gases for local lead agency consideration ("SCAQMD draft local agency threshold"); however, the SCAQMD Board has not approved the thresholds as of the date of the Notice of Preparation. The current draft thresholds consist of the following tiered approach: ■ Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA. ■ Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a greenhouse gas reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local greenhouse gas reduction plan, it does not have significant greenhouse gas emissions. ■ Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project's construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to a project's operational 44 emissions. If a project's emissions are under one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant: o All land use types: 3,000 MTCO2e per year o Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial: 1,400 MTCO2e per year; or mixed use: 3,000 MTCO2e per year. o Based on land type: Industrial (where SCAQMD is the lead agency), 10,000 MTCO2e per year. ■ Tier 4 has the following options: o Option 1: Reduce emissions from business as usual (BAU) by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined. o Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures. o Option 3, 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employees: 4.8 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans; o Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans. ■ Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold. The SCAQMD's draft threshold uses the Executive Order 5-3-05 goal as the basis for the Tier 3 screening level. Achieving the Executive Order's objective would contribute to worldwide efforts to cap carbon dioxide concentrations at 450 ppm, thus stabilizing global climate. Specifically, the Tier 3 screening level for stationary sources is based on an emission capture rate of 90 percent for all new or modified projects. A 90 percent emission capture rate means that 90 percent of total emissions from all new or modified stationary source projects would be subject to a CEQA analysis, including a negative declaration, a mitigated negative declaration, or an environmental impact report, which includes analyzing feasible alternatives and imposing feasible mitigation measures. A GHG significance threshold based on a 90 percent emission capture rate may be more appropriate to address the long-term adverse impacts associated with global climate change because most projects will be required to implement GHG reduction measures. Further, a 90 percent emission capture rate sets the emission threshold low enough to capture a substantial fraction of future stationary source projects that will be constructed to accommodate future statewide population and economic growth, while setting the emission threshold high enough to exclude small projects that will in aggregate contribute a relatively small fraction of the cumulative statewide GHG emissions. This assertion is based on the fact that staff estimates that these GHG emissions would account for slightly less than one percent of future 2050 statewide GHG emissions target (85 MMTCO2eq/yr). In addition, these small projects may be subject to future applicable GHG control regulations that would further reduce their overall future contribution to the statewide GHG inventory. Finally, these small sources are already subject to BACT for criteria pollutants and are more likely to be single -permit facilities, so they are more likely to have few opportunities readily available to reduce GHG emissions from other parts of their facility. Therefore, the SCAQMD's GHG emission thresholds are applicable to the proposed project. 45 Local - City of Costa Mesa The City of Costa Mesa does not currently have a Climate Action Plan. Thresholds of Significance for this Project. The project's emissions have been compared to the SCAQMD draft screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year and the goals of the CARB Scoping Plan. 46 Table 6 SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds' ' Source: http://www.agmd.goy/docs/default-source/cepa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2 47 Mass Daily Thresholds Pollutant Construction (lbs/day) Operation (lbs/day) NOx 100 55 VOC 75 55 P M 10 150 150 PM2.5 55 55 Sox 150 150 CO 550 550 Lead 3 3 Toxic Air Contaminants, Odor and GHG Thresholds TACs Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk >_ 10 in 1 million Cancer Burden > 0.5 excess cancer cases (in areas >_ 1 in 1 million) Chronic & Acute Hazard Index > 1.0 (project increment) Odor Project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402 GHG 10,000 MT/yr CO2e for industrial facilities Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants Pollutant Significance Threshold NO2 -1-hour average 0.18 ppm (338 µg/m^3) PM10 -24-hour average Construction Operations 10.4 µg/m^3 2.5 ug/m^3 PM2.5 -24-hour average Construction Operations 10.4 µg/m^3 2.5 µg/m^3 SO2 1 -hour average 24-hour average 0.25 ppm 0.04 ppm CO 1 -hour average 8 -hour average 20 ppm (23,000 µg/m^3) 9 ppm (10,000 µg/m^3) Lead 30 -day average Rolling 3 -month average Quarterly average 1.5 µg/m^3 0.15 µg/m^3 1.5 µg/m^3 ' Source: http://www.agmd.goy/docs/default-source/cepa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2 47 VI. SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION -RELATED AIR QUALITY IMPACTS Construction activities associated with the proposed project would have the potential to generate air emissions, toxic air contaminant emissions, and odor impacts. Assumptions for the phasing, duration, and required equipment for the construction of the proposed project were obtained from the project applicant. The proposed project is expected to occur in two phases. The construction activities for Phase 1 of the proposed project are anticipated to include: demolition of an approximately 22,750 square foot building; grading of approximately 3.84 acres; construction of a 22,860 square foot (11,584 square foot building footprint) library; paving of a 14,307 square foot parking lot; approximately 79,137 square feet of walkways and plazas and 61,950 square feet of landscaping and open space; and application of architectural coatings. The rnnctrurtinn artiyitiac for Phaca 7 of tha nronncari nrniart ara antirinated to include: ar;4dina of approximately 0.86 acres; construction of an approximately 541 square foot expansion of the existing 8,740 square foot library (expansion and renovations to repurpose the library into a 9,281 square foot Neighborhood Community Center); approximately 28,553 square feet of walkways and plazas and 7,599 square feet of landscaping and open space; paving and application of architectural coatings. Phase 1 is estimated to begin July 2017 and be completed by December 2018 and Phase 2 would begin February 2019 and be completed by February 2020. Off-site improvements would occur within Phase 1 and include paving of approximately 18,415 square feet and landscaping of approximately 1,365 square feet. Improvements include approximately 580 linear feet along Park Avenue (including the addition of 27 parking spaces) and 145 linear feet along Anaheim Avenue. A. Construction -Related Regional Impacts The construction -related regional air quality impacts have been analyzed for both criteria pollutants and GHGs. 1. Construction -Related Criteria Pollutants Analysis The following provides a discussion of the methodology used to calculate regional construction air emissions and an analysis of the proposed project's short-term construction emissions for the criteria pollutants. Methodology Typical emission rates from construction activities were obtained from CalEEMod Version 2016.3.1 CalEEMod is a computer model published by the SCAQMD for estimating air pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod program uses the EMFAC2014 computer program to calculate the emission rates specific for the western portion of San Bernardino County for construction -related employee vehicle trips and the OFFROAD2014 computer program to calculate emission rates for heavy truck operations. EMFAC2014 and OFFROAD2014 are computer programs generated by CARB that calculates composite emission rates for vehicles. Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or grams per running hour. Using CalEEIVIod, the peak daily air pollutant emissions were calculated and presented below. These emissions represent the highest level of emissions for each 48 of the construction phases in terms of air pollutant emissions. The construction emissions printouts from CalEEMod are provided in Appendix B. The project will be required to comply with existing SCAQMD rules for the reduction of fugitive dust emissions. SCAQMD Rule 403 establishes these procedures. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard best management practices in construction and operation activities, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, managing haul road dust by application of water, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph and establishing a permanent, stabilizing ground cover on finished sites. In addition, projects that disturb 50 acres or more of soil or move 5,000 cubic yards of materials per day are required to submit a Fugitive Dust Control Plan or a Large Operation Notification Form to SCAQMD. Based on the size of the Project area (approximately 4.57 acres) a Fugitive Dust Control Plan or Large Operation Notification would not be required. SCAQMD's Rule 403 minimum requirements require that the application of the best available dust control measures are used for all grading operations and include the application of water or other soil stabilizers in sufficient quantity to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes. Compliance with Rule 403 would require the use of water trucks during all phases where earth moving operations would occur. Compliance with Rule 403 is required. The phases of the construction activities which have been analyzed below for Phase 1 and Phase 2 are: 1) demolition (for phase 1 only), 2) grading, 3) building construction, 4) paving, and 5) application of architectural coatings. Appendix B includes details on construction modeling. The application of architectural coatings would occur after the completion of the construction phase. Per SCAQMD Rule 1113 as amended on June 3, 2011, the architectural coatings applied after January 1, 2014 will be limited to an average of 50 grams per liter or less. Project Impacts The construction -related criteria pollutant emissions for each construction phase for Phases 1 and 2 are shown below in Tables 7 and 8, respectively. Tables 7 and 8 show that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds during construction of either Phase 1 or Phase 2. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. B. Construction -Related Local Impacts Construction -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the South Coast Air Basin. The proposed project has been analyzed for the potential local air quality impacts created from: 49 construction -related fugitive dust and diesel emissions; from toxic air contaminants; and from construction -related odor impacts. 1. Local Air Quality Impacts from Construction The SCAQMD has published a "Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds" (South Coast Air Quality Management District 2011b). CalEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment. In order to compare CalEEMod reported emissions against the localized significance threshold lookup tables, the CEQA document should contain in its project design features or its mitigation measures the following parameters: 1) The off-road equipment list (including type of equipment, horsepower, and hours of operation) assumed for the day of construction activity with maximum emissions. 2) The maximum number of acres disturbed on the peak day. 3) Any emission control devices added onto off-road equipment. 4) Specific dust suppression techniques used on the day of construction activity with maximum emissions. The CaIEEMod output sheets included in Appendix B show the equipment used for this analysis. As shown in Table 9, the maximum number of acres disturbed in a day would be three (3) acres during grading of Phase 1. The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed using the SCAQMD's Mass Rate Localized Significant Threshold Look -up Tables and the methodology described in Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, prepared by SCAQMD, revised July 2008. The Look -up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. The emission thresholds were calculated based on the Coastal source receptor area (SRA 18) and a disturbance of three acres per day. According to LST Methodology, any receptor located closer than 25 meters (82 feet) shall be based on the 25 meter thresholds. The nearest sensitive receptors are the existing residential uses located approximately 47 feet from the western project boundary; therefore, the SCAQMD Look -up Tables for 25 meters was used. Table 10 shows the on-site emissions from the CaIEEMod model for the different construction phases and the emissions thresholds. The data provided in Table 10 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. 50 2. Construction -Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of "individual cancer risk". "Individual Cancer Risk" is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of toxic air contaminants over a 30 -year lifetime will contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk -assessment methodology. Given the relatively limited number of heavy-duty construction equipment and the short-term construction schedule, the proposed project would not result in a long-term (i.e., 30 years) substantial source of toxic air contaminant emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk. Furthermore, construction -based particulate matter (PM) emissions (including diesel exhaust emissions) do not exceed any local or regional thresholds. Therefore, no significant short-term toxic air contaminant impacts would occur during construction of the proposed project. 3. Construction -Related Odor Impacts Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process are of short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor producing materials. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts of odor producing materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during construction of the proposed project. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be emitted during construction of the project, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the project site and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors. 51 Table 7 Construction -Related Regional Pollutant Emissions for Phase 11 Activity VOC NOx Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) CO 502 PM10 PM2.5 Demolition VOC NOx Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) CO SO2 PM10* PM2.5* Site Preparation On-Site2 4.10 42.75 23.01 0.04 2.63 2.11 Off -Site' 0.14 1.84 1.05 0.01 0.27 0.08 Subtotal 4.24 44.58 24.06 0.04 2.90 2.19 Grading 51.82 40.19 0.04 9.95 1 6.45 Paving On-Site2 3.07 33.89 17.10 0.03 4.19 2.93 Off -Site' 0.09 0.25 1 0.70 1 0.00 0.18 0.05 Subtotal 3.16 34.14 17.81 0.03 4.37 2.98 Building Construction 20.35 15.39 0.02 1.26 1.08 Total of overlapping phases On -Site' 3.11 26.55 18.18 0.03 1.79 1.68 Off -Site' 0.56 3.99 4.33 0.02 1.06 0.31 Subtotal 3.67 30.54 22.51 0.04 2.85 1.99 Paving On-Site2 1.51 14.52 12.43 0.02 0.84 0.77 Off -Site' 0.10 0.07 0.79 0.00 0.23 0.06 Subtotal 1.61 14.59 13.22 0.02 1.06 0.83 Architectural Coating On -Site' 25.81 2.01 1.85 0.00 0.15 0.15 Off -Site' 0.08 0.05 0.59 0.00 0.17 0.05 Subtotal 25.89 2.06 2.44 0.00 0.32 0.20 Total of Overlapping Phases 31.17 47.18 1 38.17 0.07 4.23 3.02 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 1 55 Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No I No r Source: Ca IEEMod Version 2016.3.1. Phase 1 l On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads. 3 Off-site emissions from equipment operated on public roads. Construction, architectural coating, and paving phases may overlap. s Construction of off-site improvements will occur after grading and may overlap with construction phases of the proposed project. 52 Off -Site Improvements Activity VOC NOx Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) CO SO2 PM10* PM2.5* Site Preparation On -Site' 0.85 10.51 4.35 0.01 0.68 0.46 Off-Site3 0.03 0.02 0.22 0.00 0.06 0.02 Total 4.90 51.82 40.19 0.04 9.95 1 6.45 Paving On -Site' 1.27 9.98 7.34 0.01 0.61 0.56 Off -Site' 0.10 0.07 0.79 0.00 0.20 0.05 Total 2.81 20.35 15.39 0.02 1.26 1.08 Total of overlapping phases 33.98 67.54 53.56 0.09 5.50 4.10 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550150 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No r Source: Ca IEEMod Version 2016.3.1. Phase 1 l On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads. 3 Off-site emissions from equipment operated on public roads. Construction, architectural coating, and paving phases may overlap. s Construction of off-site improvements will occur after grading and may overlap with construction phases of the proposed project. 52 Table 8 Construction -Related Regional Pollutant Emissions for Phase 21 Activity VOC NOx Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) CO so, PM10 PM2.5 Grading On-Site2 0.95 8.60 7.69 0.01 0.92 0.68 Off-Site3 0.04 0.03 0.36 0.00 0.11 0.03 Subtotal 0.99 8.63 8.05 0.01 1.03 0.71 Building Construction On-Site2 0.96 9.82 7.54 0.01 0.61 0.56 Off -Site' 0.08 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.21 0.06 Subtotal 1.04 10.54 8.26 0.01 0.82 0.62 Paving On-Site2 0.77 7.23 7.11 0.01 0.40 0.37 Off-Site3 0.07 0.04 0.59 0.00 0.20 0.05 Subtotal 0.84 7.27 7.70 0.01 0.60 0.42 Architectural Coating On-Site2 3.26 1.68 1.83 0.00 0.11 0.11 Off -Site' 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.03 0.01 Subtotal 3.27 1.69 1.93 0.00 0.14 0.12 Total of Overlapping Phases4 5.15 19.50 17.89 0.03 1.56 1.16 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No 1 Source: CaIEEMod Version 2016.3.1. Phase 2. Z On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads. 3 Off-site emissions from equipment operated on public roads. ° Construction, architectural coating, and paving phases may overlap. 53 Table 9 Maximum Number of Acres Disturbed Per Day for Phases 1 and 2 Activity Equipment I Number Acres/8hr-day Tolal Acres Phase 1 Demolition Excavators 3 0.5 1.5 Rubber Tired Dozers 2 0.5 1 Total Per Phase 2.5 Grading Graders 1 0.5 0.5 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.5 0.5 Excavators 1 0.5 0.5 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 0.5 1.5 Total Per Phase - 3 Phase 2 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.5 0.5 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 0.5 1 Total per phase - - 1.5 54 Table 10 Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptor' for Phases 1 and 2 Phase 1 Activity On -Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Demolition 42.75 23.01 2.63 2.11 Grading 33.89 17.10 4.19 2.93 Building Construction 26.55 18.18 1.79 1.68 Paving 14.52 12.43 0.84 0.77 Architectural Coating 2.01 1.85 0.15 0.15 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet)2 131 962 7 5 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Phase 2 On -Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Activity NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Grading 8.60 7.69 0.92 0.68 Building Construction 9.82 7.54 0.61 0.56 Paving 7.23 7.11 0.40 0.37 Architectural Coating 1.68 1.83 0.11 0.11 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet)2 92 647 4 3 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No ' Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look -up Tables for 2 acres for Phase 1 and 1 acre for Phase 2 in SRA 18 North Coastal Orange County. Z The estimated distance from the proposed construction activities to the nearest sensitive receptor (residences to the west) of the project site is -47 feet (^'14 meters) . 55 VII. LONG-TERM OPERATIONAL AIR QUALITY IMPACTS The on-going operation of the proposed project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the project -generated vehicle trips and through operational emissions from the on-going use of the proposed project. The following section provides an analysis of potential long-term air quality impacts due to: regional air quality and local air quality impacts with the on-going operations of the proposed project. A. Operations -Related Regional Air Quality Impacts The potential operations -related air emissions have been analyzed below for the criteria pollutants and cumulative imnarts. 1. Operations -Related Criteria Pollutant Analysis The operations -related criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed through use of the CalEEMod model. The operating emissions were based on the year 2019 for Phase 1 and 2020 for Phase 2, which are the anticipated opening years for the proposed project. The operations daily emissions printouts from the CalEEMod model are provided in Appendix B. The CalEEMod analyzes operational emissions from area sources, energy usage, and mobile sources, which are discussed below. Mobiles Sources Mobile sources include emissions from the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed project. As no traffic study was available, CalEEMod defaults for library and general office uses (closest representative use for a Neighborhood Community Center in CalEEMod) were used to estimate emissions from the vehicle trips associated with the proposed project (see Appendix B). Area Sources Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural coatings. No changes were made to the default area source parameters. Energy Usage Energy usage includes emissions from the generation of electricity and natural gas used on-site. No changes were made to the default energy usage parameters. Project Impacts The highest emissions from either summer or winter criteria pollutant emissions created from the proposed project's long-term operations have been calculated for Phase 1 and Phase 2 and are summarized below in Table 11. Table 11 also includes the total emissions for Phases 1 and 2 combined. The results show that none of the phases individually or combined would exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the proposed project. 56 Furthermore, Table 12 shows that when maximum daily construction emissions (from the highest -emitting construction phases of Phase 2) are added to the unmitigated operational emissions of the completed Phase 1, the total emissions still meet SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the proposed project. 2. Cumulative Regional Air Quality Impacts Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the project area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel well out of the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered, would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the project's air quality must be generic by nature. The project area is out of attainment for both ozone and PM10 particulate matter. Construction and operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of the South Coast Air Basin. The greatest cumulative impact on the quality of regional air cell will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development and the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of these projects. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur separately or simultaneously. However, in accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed the SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. With respect to long-term emissions, this project would create a less than significant cumulative impact. B. Operations -Related Local Air Quality Impacts Project -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the South Coast Air Basin. The proposed project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emission impacts from the project - generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on-site operations. The following analysis analyzes the vehicular CO emissions, local impacts from on-site operations, and odor impacts. 1. Local CO Emission Impacts from Prosect -Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal CO standards which were presented in above in Section V. 57 To determine if the proposed project could cause emission levels in excess of the CO standards discussed above in Section V, a sensitivity analysis is typically conducted to determine the potential for CO "hot spots" at a number of intersections in the general project vicinity. Because of reduced speeds and vehicle queuing, "hot spots" typically occur at high traffic volume intersections with a Level of Service E or worse. The 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan) showed that an intersection which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day would not violate the CO standard. The potential traffic generated by the project did not even meet the minimum threshold to require a traffic study and no traffic study was provided. Therefore, no CO "hot spot" modeling was performed and no significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on- going use or the proposed project. 2. Local Air Quality Impacts from On -Site Operations Project -related air emissions from on-site sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, on-site usage of natural gas appliances as well as the operation of vehicles on-site may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The nearest sensitive receptors that may be impacted by the proposed project are the residential use directly adjacent to the west and east of the project site. According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a project, if the project includes stationary sources, or attracts mobile sources (such as heavy-duty trucks) that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site; such as industrial warehouse/transfer facilities. The proposed project does not include such uses. During operation, on-site emissions would be negligible and would primarily consist of the intermittent on-site travel of motor vehicles. Therefore, due the lack of stationary source emissions, no long-term localized significance threshold analysis is warranted. 3. Operations -Related Odor Impacts Potential sources that may emit odors during the on-going operations of the proposed project would include odor emissions from diesel truck emissions and trash storage areas. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the project site and through compliance with SCAQMD's Rule 402 no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project. 58 Table 11 Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions for Phases 1 and 21 Phase 1 Activity 1.71 4.41 Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) 0.04 3.59 VOC NOx CO S02 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources2 0.58 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.01 0.13 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.01 Mobile Sources4 1.08 4.24 12.89 0.04 3.53 0.98 Total Emissions 1.67 4.37 13.02 0.04 3.54 0.99 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Phase 2 Activity 1.71 4.41 Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) 0.04 3.59 ROG NOx CO S02 PM10 PM2.5 Area SourcesZ 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources° 0.01 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.04 0.01 Total Emissions 0.04 0.04 0.14 0.00 0.04 0.01 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Total for Phase 1 and Phase 2 1.71 4.41 13.15 0.04 3.59 1.00 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No 1 Source: CaIEEMod Version 2016.3.1. Phase 1, and Phase 2 Z Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 3 Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on-site natural gas usage. Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. 59 Table 12 Overlapping Regional Construction and Operational Emissions' Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NOx CO so, PM10 PM2.5 Total for Phase 1 plus construction Phase 2 6.82 23.88 30.91 0.07 5.10 2.15 SCAQMD Operational Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No ' Overlapping emissions calculated from the highest emissions levels during construction and the active operational phase(s). VIII. GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE ANALYSIS The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste, water, and construction equipment. The following provides the methodology used to calculate the project -related GHG emissions, the project impacts and a consistency analysis of the proposed project with any applicable GHG reduction plans, policies or regulations. A. Methodology The CalEEMod Version 2016.3.1 was used to calculate the GHG emissions from the proposed project. As stated previously, the City of Costa Mesa does not currently have a Climate Action Plan; therefore, the project has been compared to the goals of the CARB Scoping Plan. Based on the CARB Scoping Plan, reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 means cutting approximately 30 percent from business -as -usual (BAU) emissions levels, or about 15 percent from year 2008 levels. The project's year 2019 for Phase 1 and 2020 for Phase 2 (opening years) unmitigated emissions were calculated and compared to the SCAQMD tier 3 SCAQMD draft screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons CO2e per year for all land uses and the results for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 are shown in Table 13. 1. Area Sources Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural coatings. No changes were made to the default area source parameters. 2. Energy Usage Energy usage includes emissions from the generation of electricity and natural gas used on-site. The energy usage was based on the CalEEMod defaults. No changes were made to the default energy usage parameters. 3. Mobile Sources Mobile sources were analyzed in the manner described in Section VII above. CalEEMod defaults were used in the analysis. 4. Waste Waste includes the GHG emissions generated from the processing of waste from the proposed project as well as the GHG emissions from the waste once it is interred into a landfill. The CalEEMod default values were used in the analysis. 61 5. Water Water includes the water used for the interior of the building as well as for landscaping and is based on the GHG emissions associated with the energy used to transport and filter the water. The CalEEMod default values were used in the analysis. 6. Construction The construction -related GHG emissions were also included in the analysis and were based on a 30 year amortization rate as recommended in the SCAQMD GHG Working Group meeting on November 19, 2009. The construction -related GHG emissions were calculated by I.. Luviou and detailed above in Section vL B. Proiect Greenhouse Gas Emissions The GHG emissions have been calculated based on the parameters described above. A summary of the results are shown below in Table 13 and the CalEEMod Model run for the proposed project is provided in Appendix C. Table 13 shows that Phase 1 of the proposed project would generate unmitigated GHG emissions in the amount of 733.07 MTCO2e per year, while the unmitigated GHG emissions for Phase 2 would be 29.20 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, the project's total unmitigated GHG emissions for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 would be 762.28 MTCO2e per year. According to the thresholds of significance established above in Section V above, a cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the on-going operations would exceed the tier 3 SCAQMD draft screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons CO2e per year for all land uses. As the project's GHG emissions meet the SCAQMD screening threshold, the impacts from GHGs are considered to be less than significant. In addition, the proposed library building is to be LEED Gold certified and the new Neighborhood Community Center is to be LEED Silver certified, which will further reduce project -related greenhouse emissions. Appendix C includes further details regarding the proposed project's LEED certification. C. Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency The proposed project would have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. As stated previously, the City of Costa Mesa does not currently have a Climate Action Plan; therefore, the project and its GHG emissions have been compared to the goals of the CARB Scoping Plan. The ARB Board approved a Climate Change Scoping Plan in December 2008. The Scoping Plan outlines the State's strategy to achieve the 2020 greenhouse gas emissions limit. The Scoping Plan "proposes a comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions in California, improve our environment, reduce our dependence 62 on oil, diversify our energy sources, save energy, create new jobs, and enhance public health" (California Air Resources Board 2008). The measures in the Scoping Plan have been in place since 2012. This Scoping Plan calls for an "ambitious but achievable" reduction in California's greenhouse gas emissions, cutting approximately 30 percent from business -as -usual emission levels projected for 2020, or about 10 percent from today's levels. On a per -capita basis, that means reducing annual emissions of 14 tons of carbon dioxide for every man, woman and child in California down to about 10 tons per person by 2020. In May 2014, CARB released its First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan (CARB 2014). This Update identifies the next steps for California's leadership on climate change. While California continues on its path to meet the near-term 2020 greenhouse gas limit, it must also set a clear path toward long-term, deep GHG emission reductions. This report highlights California's success to date in reducing its GHG emissions and lays the foundation for establishing a broad framework for continued emission reductions beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Project consistency with applicable strategies in the Plan is assessed in Table 14. As shown in Table 14, the project is consistent with the applicable strategies. Furthermore, as the project's unmitigated emissions fall well below the tier 3 SCAQMD draft screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons CO2e per year for all land uses, the project will comply with applicable Green Building Standards and City of Costa Mesa's policies regarding sustainability (as dictated by the City's General Planj, and will achieve LEED certification, further analysis is not warranted. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. 63 Table 13 Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Phases 1 and 21 Phase 1 Category Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Bio-CC2 NonBio-0O2 CO2 CH, N20 CO2e Area Source S2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.00 92.38 92.38 0.00 0.00 92.77 Mobile Sources 0.00 614.25 614.25 0.03 0.00 614.96 Wastes 2.16 0.00 2.16 0.13 0.00 5.36 Water 0.12 3.51 3.62 0.01 0.00 4.02 Construction? 0.00 15.89 15.89 0.00 0.00 15.96 Total Emissions 2.28 726.03 728.31 0.17 0.00 733.07 SCAQMD Screening Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No Phase 2 Category Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year) Bio-CC2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH, N20 CO2e Area Sources2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.00 6.82 6.82 0.00 0.00 6.85 Mobile Sources° 0.00 14.61 14.61 0.00 0.00 14.63 Wastes 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.00 0.63 Water 0.08 1.52 1.59 0.01 0.00 1.85 Construction? 0.00 5.21 5.21 0.00 0.00 5.25 Total Emissions 0.33 28.16 28.49 0.03 0.00 29.20 SCAQMD Screening Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No Total for Phase 1 and Phase 2 762.28 SCAQMD Screening Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No 1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2016.3.1. Phase 1, and Phase 2 2 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. 3 Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. ° Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 5 Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 6 Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. Construction GHG emissions based on a 30 year amortization rate. Phase 1 includes off-site improvements. 64 Table 14 CARB Scoping Plan Measure Comparison' Scoping Plan Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Compliance with Measure California Light -Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Standards — Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the project Implement adopted standards and planned second phase of that are required to comply with the standards will comply with the strategy. the program. Align zero -emission vehicle, alternative and renewable fuel and vehicle technology programs with long- term climate change goals. Energy Efficiency — Maximize energy efficiency building and Consistent. The proposed Library is to be LEED Gold certified and the proposed appliance standards; pursue additional efficiency including Neighborhood Community Center is to be LEED Silver certified. The project will new technologies, policy, and implementation mechanisms. be compliant with the current Title 24 standards. Pursue comparable investment in energy efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in California. Low Carbon Fuel Standard — Develop and adopt the Low Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the project Carbon Fuel Standard. that are required to comply with the standards will comply with the strategy. Vehicle Efficiency Measures — Implement light-duty vehicle Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the project efficiency measures. that are required to comply with the standards will comply with the strategy. Medium/Heavy-Duty Vehicles—Adopt medium and heavy- Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the project duty vehicle efficiency measures. that are required to comply with the standards will comply with the strategy. Green Building Strategy — Expand the use of green building Consistent. The California Green Building Standards Code (proposed Part 11, practices to reduce the carbon footprint of California's new Title 24) was adopted as part of the California Building Standards Code in the and existing inventory of buildings. CCR. Part 11 establishes voluntary standards, that will become mandatory in the 2010 edition of the Code, on planning and design for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and internal air contaminants. The project will be subject to these mandatory standards. Further, The proposed Library is to be LEED Gold certified and the proposed Neighborhood Community Center is to be LEED Silver certified. High Global Warming Potential Gases — Adopt measures to Consistent. CARB identified five measures that reduce HFC emissions from reduce high global warming potential gases. vehicular and commercial refrigeration systems; vehicles that access the project that are required to comply with the measures will comply with the strategy. Recycling and Waste — Reduce methane emissions at Consistent. The state is currently developing a regulation to reduce methane landfills. Increase waste diversion, composting, and emissions from municipal solid waste landfills. The project will be required to commercial recycling. Move toward zero -waste. comply with City programs, such as City's recycling and waste reduction program, which comply, with the 50 percent reduction required in AB 939. Water — Continue efficiency programs and use cleaner Consistent. The project will comply with all applicable City ordinances. energy sources to move and treat water. 1 Source: CARB Scoping Plan (2008) 65 IX. AIR QUALITY COMPLIANCE The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable General Plans and Regional Plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with the AQMP. The purpose of this discussion is to set forth the issues regarding consistency with the assumptions and objectives of the AQMP and discuss whether the proposed project would interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards. If the decision -makers determine that the nrnnncarl nrniart is inrnncictant tha laarl aaanry may consider project modifications or inclusion of mitigation to eliminate the inconsistency. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2010 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Both of these criteria are evaluated in the following sections. A. Criterion 1- Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in this Air Analysis, short-term construction impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. This Air Analysis also found that long-term operations impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD local and regional thresholds of significance. Therefore, the proposed project is not projected to contribute to the exceedance of any air pollutant concentration standards and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the first criterion. B. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP? Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for the proposed project are based on the same M. forecasts as the AQMP. The Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCP&G) consists of three sections: Core Chapters, Ancillary Chapters, and Bridge Chapters. The Growth Management, Regional Mobility, Air Quality, Water Quality, and Hazardous Waste Management chapters constitute the Core Chapters of the document. These chapters currently respond directly to federal and state requirements placed on SCAG. Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this project, the City of Redlands General Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in the AQMP. The project site is currently designated as Public/Institutional in the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed project is consistent with the current land use designation and would not require a General Plan Amendment or zone change. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an inconsistency with the current land use designation. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. Based on the above, the proposed project will not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur. 67 X. MITIGATION MEASURES A. Construction Measures The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 - Fugitive Dust. No construction mitigation is required. B. Operational Measures No operational mitigation is required. ll XI. REFERENCES California Air Resources Board 2008 Resolution 08-43 2008 Airborne Toxic Control Measure for in -use Diesel -Fueled Transport Refrigeration Units (TRU) and TRU Generator Sets, Section 2477 of Division 3, Chapter 9, Title 13, California Code of Regulations 2008 Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act 2008 ARB Recommended Interim Risk Management Policy for Inhalation -Based Residential Cancer Risk — Frequently Asked Questions 2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan, a framework for change. 2011 Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document 2013 Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality. Source: https://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/almanac/almanacl3/almanacl3.htm 2014 First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan, Building on the Framework Pursuant to A632, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. May. 2016 Historical Air Quality, Top 4 Summary City of Costa Mesa 2016 2015-2035 General Plan. June. Governor's Office of Planning and Research 2008 CEQA and Climate: Addressing Climate Change Through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review 2009 CEQA Guideline Sections to be Added or Amended Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014 IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment 2015 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines South Coast Air Quality Management District 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook 2005 Rule 403 Fugitive Dust .• 2007 2007 Air Quality Management Plan 2008 Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, Revised 2012 Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan 2016 Draft 2016 Air Quality Management Plan 2017 Historical Data by Year. 2013, 2014 and 2015 Air Quality Data Tables. Source: http://www.agmd.gov/home/library/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year Southern California Association of Governments /-U Z T 201.2 2012-2035 Regional l ransportation Pian/Sustainable Communities Strategy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2017 Understanding Global Warming Potentials (Source: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming- potentials) U.S. Geological Survey 2011 Reported Historic Asbestos Mines, Historic Asbestos Prospects, and Other Natural Occurrences of Asbestos in California 70 APPENDICES Appendix A — Glossary of Terms Appendix B — CaIEEMod Model Daily Emissions Printouts Appendix C — CalEEMod Model Annual Emissions Printouts and LEED Information APPENDIX A Glossary of Terms AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BACT Best Available Control Technologies CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency CARB California Air Resources Board CCAA California Clean Air Act CCAR California Climate Action Registry CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFCs Chlorofluorocarbons CH4 Methane CNG Compressed natural gas CO Carbon monoxide CO2 Carbon dioxide CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent DPM Diesel particulate matter EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency GHG Greenhouse gas GWP Global warming potential HIDPM Hazard Index Diesel Particulate Matter HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons IPCC International Panel on Climate Change LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard LST Localized Significant Thresholds MTCO2e Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent MMTCO2e Million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NOx Nitrogen Oxides NO2 Nitrogen dioxide N2O Nitrous oxide 03 Ozone OPR Governor's Office of Planning and Research PFCs Perfluorocarbons PM Particle matter PM10 Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter PM2.5 Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter PMI Point of maximum impact PPM Parts per million PPB Parts per billion RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Plan RTP Regional Transportation Plan SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SF Square Feet SF6 Sulfur hexafluoride SIP State Implementation Plan Sox Sulfur Oxides T6 Heavy Duty Trucks from EMFAC 2007 classifications T7 Heavy -Heavy Duty Trucks from EMFAC 2007 classifications TAC Toxic air contaminants VOC Volatile organic compounds APPENDIX B CaIEEMod Model Daily Emissions Printouts CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 Orange County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Library 11.58 1000sgft 0.27 22,860.00 0 i Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 141.09 1000sgft 3.24 141,087.00 0 Parking Lot 14.31 1000sgft 0.33 14,307.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2019 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer Project Characteristics - . Land Use - Phase 1- 22,860 sf library (11,584 sf building footprint), 79,137 sf of walkways & plazas, 61,950 sf of landscaping & open space, and a 14,307 sf parking lot. Construction Phase - Construction to start July 2017 and end December 2018. Demolition - Existing —22,750 sf Neighborhood Community Center to be demolished. Grading - Per developer, fill 3,997 cubic feet - cut 994 cubic feet = 3,033 cubic feet fill. 3,033 cubic feet = 111.2 cubic yards fill. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Lions Park is located in the downtown portion of the City of Costa Mesa. OCTA Route 43 stop Park -19th is across Park Avenue (-53 feet or -0.01 miles from project site). Water Mitigation - Per Green Building Standards. Waste Mitigation - AB 939 requires each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 40 i 15 tblConstructionPhase ---------------------------------------------------------- --------------- - - - - - - - - - - - NumDays 18.00 Y tblConstructionPhase y Y-----------------------------f-------------------------- 230.00 325.00 tblCon structionPhase y r-----------------------------+-------------------------- NumDa s 8.00 25.00 ----------------------------- _---------------- tblConstructionPhase ----------- r----------------------------- -------------------------- NumDay s 18.00 10.00 ----------------------------- tblGrading ----------------------------- r------------------------------ -------------------------- AcresOfGrading 12.50 i 4.00 -----------------------------Y tblGrading -----------------------------%------------------------------ Material Imported 0.00 1 111.20 ----------------------------- _-------------------------------------------------------------- tblLandUse f-------------------------- Buildin S aces uareFeet 11,580.00 1 22,860.00 ----------------------------- _----------------- tblLandUse ----------- -------------------------------f-------------------------- Buildin S acesq uareFeet 141,090.00 1 141,087.00 -----------------------------+----------g----------------- tblLandUse r -----------------------------f-------------------------- Buildin S acesquareFeet 14,310.00 1 14,307.00 ----------------------------- _---------------q------------- tblLandUse -------------------------------f-------------------------- LandUseS uareFeet 11,580.00 22,860.00 ----------------------------- tblLandUse ------------------------------ .------------------------------ -------------------------- LandUseSquareFeet 141,090.00 141,087.00 -----------------------------Y---------------------------- tblLandUse r------------------------------}-------------------------- LandUseSquareFeet 14,310.00 14,307.00 ----------------------------- tblProjectCharacteristics ----- OperationalYear 2018 2019 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 4.2295 44.5535 24.0627 0.0447 6.3697 2.2045 8.'493 3.3758 2.0530 5.0131 i 0.0000 4,555.708 4,555.708 1.1257 0.0000 4,583.850 i 1 1 0 i 2018 25.8787 27.0779 21.4547 0.0430 1.0236 1.5310 2.5546 0.2757 1.4395 1.7152 i 0.0000 4,283.994 4,283.994 0.7341 0.0000 4,302.347 i 1 1 4 1 ' ' Maximum 25.8787 44.5535 24.0627 0.0447 6.3697 2.2045 8.1493 3.3758 2.0530 5.0131 0.0000 4,555.708 4,555.708 1.1257 0.0000 4,583.850 1 1 0 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 4.2295 44.5535 24.0627 0.0447 2.5924 2.2045 4.3720 1.3453 2.0530 2.9826 s 0.0000 4,555.708 4,555.708 1.1257 0.0000 4,583.850 1 1 0 ---- ------------------------------------------------------- ------- -------r-------+-- - 2018 25.8787 27.0779 21.4547 0.0430 1.0236 1.5310 2.5546 0.2757 1.4395 1.7152 0.0000 4,283.994 4,283.994 0.7341 - 0.0000 ? 4,302.347 S 1 1 4 a Maximum 25.8787 44.5535 24.0627 0.0447 2.5924 2.2045 4.3720 1.3453 2.0530 2.9826 0.0000 4,555.708 4755.708 1.1257 0.0000 4,5n850 1 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.09 0.00 35.29 55.61 0.00 30.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 11 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 I Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 IPM2.5Total jNBio-C 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.0000e- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- ! 0.0365 0.0365 1.000Oe- 0.0390 004 005 ; 005 005 005 004 : Energy 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- - 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- + 154.5122 - 154.5122 - 2.9600e- - 2.8300e- 155.4304 004 003 003 ; 003 ; 003 i 003 003 Mobile 1.0784 4.1244 12.8903 0.0423 3.4873 0.0471 3.5344 0.9325 0.0443 0.9768 4,288.304 4,288.304 0.1925 - ?4,293 1172 3 3 ' ' Total 1.6718 4.2533 13.0157 0.0431 3.4873 0.0569 3.5443 0.9325 0.0541 0.9867 0.0377 4,442.853 4,442.853 0.1956 2.8300e- 4,448.586 2.8300e- 2,790.713 1 0 0 7 003 6 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PPA10 Fugitive Exhaust Bio -0O2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I IPM2.5Total INBio-771 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- ! 0.0365 0.0365 1.000Oe- 0.0390 004 ; ; 005 005 ; 005 ; 005 i ; 004 : Energy 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 154.5122 - 154.5122 - 2.9600e- - 2.8300e- 155.4304 004 003 003 003 003 i 003 003 . . . . . . . . . . . fl---------------------•--------------1------------------------------------ * Mob le0.9252 3.1166 8.7365 0.0260 2.0710 0.0296 2.1005 0.5538 0.0278 0.5816 . . . . . . . -------1-•------ ------- •�--------------- ------T.......Mobile + 2,632.032 2,632.032 0.1285 2,635.244 0 0 2 1 i ' 1 ' Total 1.5185 3.2455 8.8618 0.0267 2.0710 0.0394 2.1104 0.5538 0.0377 0.5915 2,786.580 2,786.580 0.1316 2.8300e- 2,790.713 1 7 7 003 7 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 5 25; 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction 9/2/2017 :11/30/2018 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total -----------r----------- 5 :Architectural Coating "Architectural Coating :12/15/2018 -12/28/2018 Percent 9.16 23.69 31.91 37.96 40.62 30.71 40.46 40.61 30.41 40.06 0.00 37.28 37.28 32.74 0.00 37.27 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition •Demolition 7/1/2017 :7/28/2017 5: 20: 2 •Grading :Grading -----------4------------4 7/29/2017 :9/1/2017 5 25; 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction 9/2/2017 :11/30/2018 5: 325: 4 :Paving :Paving -----------4------------4 12/1/2018 :12/14/2018 5: 10; -----------r----------- 5 :Architectural Coating "Architectural Coating :12/15/2018 -12/28/2018 5: 10, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 3.57 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 34,290; Non -Residential Outdoor: 11,430; Striped Parking Area: 9,324 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer I Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type ' Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 i 8.00; 81' 0.73 -------------------- Demolition --------------------------------F- •Excavators ----------------;-------------F---------------------------- ------ --- - - --- 3I 8.00 158' 0.38 --------------------------- Demolition --------------------------- Tired F------------------------------ F :Rubber Dozers 2I 8.00 : 247 0.40 --------------------------- Gradin ----------------------------F---------------- -------------F 9 :Excavators 1 8.00 : 158 : 0.38 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- --------------------- Grading •Graders 1 8.00- 187: 0.41 Grading :---------------------------I----------------- ;-------------i--------------------------- -------------- •Rubber Tired Dozers 1I 8.00 247' 0.40 -------H---------------3i -- -------------- Gradin g Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 8.00E 9-- -------------------------- ----------------------------H---------------- a- - - - - - - - - - - - - F Building Construction •Cranes 1 i 7.00- 231' 0.29 Building Construction :---------------------------F-----------------------------F "Forklifts 3: 8.00: 89' 0.20 Building Construction :---------------------------F------- 'Generator ---------i --- F Sets 1 I 8.00;84' 0.74 Building C---------------------------F---------------- ;-------------f----------------------------------------- Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3: 7.00: 97 0.37 Building Construction ---------------------------- •Welders I------------------------------ F 1. 8.00: 46' 0.45 --------------------------- ---------- ------------------F----------------' Paving :Cement and Mortar Mixers 2i 9: 0.56 -------------------------------------------------------- Paving 6.00E ------------ - F------------------------------------------ • Pavers 118.00. 130: 0.42 Paving : ---------------------------H---------------- i -------------F---------------------------- -------------- •Paving Equipment 21 6.00- 132: 0.36 -------------------------------------------------------- Paving H ---------------2I------------- -----------------------80; -------------- ' :Rollers i 6.00 0.381 Paving :---------------------------F----------------;-------------F---------------------------- 9 •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 i 8.00 97' 0.37 - - - - •1 ------------------------------------------- ------------ 4 Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00, 78, 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer Phase NameI Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length I Length Class I Vehicle Class I Vehicle Class Demolition 6i 15.00, 0.001 103.00, 14.70; 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix iHHDT ----------------------------------------- I.-----------I I Exhaust ----------- I----------4- --------- I --------------I-------- --T ' Grading 61 15.00, 0.001 14.00: 14.70 6.90: 20.001LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ----------------I -----------;----......i ---------' r ----------- ' --- Construction 91 75.00: 29.001 0.00. 14.70 6.90: 20.00 LD HDT_Mix :HHDT ----------------- -------- Total '--------- -Mix ------------ - Paving 81 20.00, I----------'----------- 0.00: 0.00. 14.70 6.90: 20.001LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix iHHDT -------------------------------+--------------------T--------------------+--------- 1--------- -------------- 4 --------- -� Architectural Coating 1; 15.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00 -LD -Mix ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 1.1197 0.0000 1.1197 0.1695 0.0000 0.1695 i 0.0000 0.0000 ., , A , Off -Road 4.1031 42.7475 23.0122 0.0388 2.1935 2.1935 2.0425 2.0425 + 3,924.283 3,924.283 1.0730 3,951.107 A3 3 , 0 Total 4.1031 42.7475 23.0122 0.0388 1.1197 2.1935 3.3132 0.1695 2.0425 2.2120 3,924.283 3,924.283 1.0730 3,951.107 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust Ph110 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 1 PM2.5 INBio-7otal I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0520 1.7539 0.3887 4.1000e- 0.0897 9.8900e- O.C996 0.0246 9.4600e- 0.0340 i 452.7184 452.7184 0.0475 453.9067 003 ' 003 ' 003 ' i Off-Road 4.1031 42.7475 23.0122 0.0388 2.1935 2.1935 2.0425 2.0425 0.0000 3,924.283 3,924.283 1.0730 : 3,951.107 3 3 0 1 1 1 13,924.283 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 42.7475 23.0122 0.0388 0.4367 2.1935 2.6301 Worker 0.0744 0.0521 0.6618 1.7900e- 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 178.7065 178.7065 5.2000e- T 178.8364 003 003 003 i 003 1 1 i ' 1 Total 0.1264 1.8060 1.0505 5.8900e- 0.2574 0.0110 0.2684 0.0690 0.0105 0.0795 631.4248 631.4248 0.0527 632.7430 0 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio-CO217tal Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.4367 0.0000 0.4367 0.0661 0.0000 0.0661 1 0.0000 0.0000 --------------------------- Off-Road 4.1031 42.7475 23.0122 0.0388 2.1935 2.1935 2.0425 2.0425 0.0000 3,924.283 3,924.283 1.0730 : 3,951.107 3 3 0 1 1 1 13,924.283 Total 4.1031 42.7475 23.0122 0.0388 0.4367 2.1935 2.6301 0.0661 2.0425 2.1086 0.0000 3,924.2831 1.0730 3,951.107 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0520 1.7539 0.3887 4.1000e- 0.0897 9.8900e- 0.0996 0.0246 9.4600e- 0.0340 + 452.7184 452.7184 0.0475 453.9067 003 003 ; ; 003 .,, + Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i Worker 0.0744 0.0521 0.6618 1.7900e- 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 + 178.7065 178.7065 5.2000e- 178.8364 003 003 003 + ; 003 33.8868 Total 0.1264 1.8060 1.0505 5.8900e- 0.2574 0.0110 0.2684 0.0690 0.0105 0.0795 631.4248 631.4248 0.0527 632.7430 003 7 7 9 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 6.1923 0.0000 6.1923 3.3286 0.0000 3.3286 0.0000 0.0000 A .,, + Off -Road 3.0705 33.8868 17.1042 0.0297 1.7774 1.7774 1.6352 1.6352 i 3,037.910 3,037.910 0.9308 3,061.180 + 7 7 9 + Total 3.0705 33.8868 17.1042 0.0297 6.1923 1.7774 7.9697 3.3286 1.6352 4.9639 3,037.910 3,037.910 0.9308 3,061.180 7 7 9 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust Ph110 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.51 INBio-7tal I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 5.6500e- 0.1907 0.0423 4.5000e- 9.7500e- 1.0800e- O.C108 2.6700e- 1.0300e- 3.7000e- + 49.2276 49.2276 5.1700e- - 49.3568 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 i 003 ., -------------------- i _ i , , Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 33.8868 i s ., s Worker 0.0744 0.0521 0.6618 1.7900e- 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 i 178.7065 178.7065 5.2000e- 178.8364 003 003 003 1 ' • i 003 ; 1 Total 0.0801 0.2428 0.7041 2.2400e- 0.1774 2.2000e- 0.1796 0.0471 2.0600e- 0.0492 227.9341 227.9341 0.0104 228.1932 7 7 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio-7tal I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 2.4150 0.0000 2.4150 1.2982 0.0000 1.2982 i 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 3.0705 33.8868 17.1042 0.0297 1.7774 1.7774 1.6352 1.6352 0.0000 3,037.910 3,037.910 0.9308 ? 3,061.180 i A 7 7 9 1 1 ' ' Total 3.0705 33.8868 17.1042 0.0297 2.4150 1.7774 4.1924 1.2982 1.6352 2.9334 0.0000 3,037.910 3,037.910 0.9308 3,061.180 11 1 7 7 9 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 5.6500e- 0.1907 0.0423 4.5000e- 9.7500e- 1.0800e- 0.0108 2.6700e- 1.0300e- 3.7000e- ! 49.2276 - 49.2276 5.1700e- 49.3568 003 ; 004 003 ; 003 003 003 003003 •s Total 3.1149 26.5546 18.1825 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7879 i - - _ - - - - - - - - f1- - - - - - -1- - - - - - -7- - - - - - -7- - - - - - -1- - - - - - -1- - - - - - -1- - - - - - -1- - - - - - -1- - - - - - -T- - - - - - - y - - - - - __- - - - - - -T . . . . . . . Worker 0.0744 0.0521 0.6618 1.7900e- 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 003 003 ; 003 i 178.7065 178.7065 5.2000e- 178.8364 ; 003 Total 0.0801 0.2428 0.7041 2.2400e- 0.1774 2.2000e- 0.1796 0.0471 2.0600e- 0.0492 227.9341 227.9341 0.0104 228.1932 7 7 003 003 003 1 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 3.1149 26.5546 18.1825 0.0269 1.7879 1.7879 1.6791 1.6791 ! 2,650.979 2,650.979 0.6531 2,667.307 i 7 7 8 Total 3.1149 26.5546 18.1825 0.0269 1.7879 1.7879 1.6791 1.6791 2,650.979 2,650.979 0.6531 2,667.307 7 7 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 , ., ----------------------;-------i- + ___ -------T--- Vendor 0.1340 3.6898 1.0203 7.3800e- 0.1853 0.0322 0.2175 0.0533 0.0308 0.0841 798.9297 798.9297 0.0720 003------------------------------ 800.7297 ., , 1 Worker 0.3721 0.2604 3.3092 8.9700e- 0.8383 5.5800e- 0.8439 0.2223 5.1400e- 0.2275 893.5323 893.5323 0.0260 894.1818 003 ; 003 ; ; 003 ' Total 0.5061 3.9501 4.3294 0.0164 1.0236 0.0377 1.0614 0.2757 0.0359 0.3116 1,692.462 1,692.462 0.0980 1,694.911 0 0 7 5 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PNI10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 3.1149 26.5546 18.1825 0.0269 1.7879 1.7879 1.6791 1.6791 1 0.0000 - 2,650.979 2,650.979 0.6531 2,667.307 7 7 , , 8 1 + Total 3.1149 26.5546 18.1825 0.0269 1.7879 1.7879 1.6791 1.6791 0.0000 2,650.979 2,650.979 0.6531 2,667.307 7 7 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _______ Vendor 0.1340 3.6898 1.0203 7.3800e- 0.1853 0.0322 0.2175 0.0533 0.0308 0.0841 i 798.9297 798.9297 0.0720 r 800.7297 003 2.6795 Worker 0.3721 0.2604 3.3092 8.9700e- 0.8383 5.5800e- 0.8439 0.2223 5.1400e- 0.2275 i 893.5323 893.5323 0.0260 T 894.1818 003 ; 003 ; 003 i ' Total 0.5061 3.9501 4.3294 0.0164 1.0236 0.0377 1.0614 0.2757 0.0359 0.3116 1,692.462 1,692.462 0.0980 1,694.911 11 1 1 1 0 0 5 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 2.6795 23.3900 17.5804 0.0269 1.4999 1.4999 1.4099 1.4099 2,620.935 2,620.935 0.6421 2,636.988 1 1 3 ' Total 2.6795 23.3900 17.5804 0.0269 1.4999 1.4999 1.4099 1.4099 2,620.935 2,620.935 0.6421 2,636.988 1 1 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4N20 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------ -----:-----------------------�--003___--1------- �------- �------- �------- �-------T-------i------- ____ Vendor 0.1175 3.4595 0.9282 7.3300e- 0.1853 0.0256 0.2109 0.0533 0.0245 0.0778 797.2781 795.5522 795.5522 0.0690 T i ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------T---------- Worker 0.3358 0.2283 2.9460 8.7100e- 0.8383 5.5400e- 0.6439 0.2223 5.1000e- 0.2274 867.5067 867.5067 0.0230 868.0810 003 003 003 1 ' Total 0.4533 3.6878 3.8742 0.0160 1.0236 0.0311 1.0548 0.2757 0.0296 0.3052 1,663.058 1,663.058 0.0920 1,665.359 1 1 3 9 9 2 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust Ph110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 2.6795 23.3900 17.5804 0.0269 1.4999 1.4999 1.4099 1.4099 i 0.0000 2,620.935 2,620.935 0.6421 2,636.988 1 1 ; 3 1 1 • ' ' ' Total 2.6795 23.3900 17.5804 0.0269 1.4999 1.4999 1.4099 1.4099 0.0000 2,620.935 2,620.935 0.6421 2,636.988 1 1 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 tal CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INB"7 I 1 I Category Ib/day lb/day Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 , ., Paving 0.0865 0.0000 r * Vendor 0.1175 1 3.4595 0.9282 7.3300e- 0.1853 0.0256 0.2109 0.0533 0.0245 0.0778 795.5522 795.5522 0.0690 797.2781 003 ..---------n------- --------------- �------- �------- �------- �------- �------- �-------T-------y------- ,------- ------- ---------- Worker 0.3358 0.2283 2.9460 8.7100e- 0.8383 5.5400e- 0.8439 0.2223 5.1000e- 0.2274 } 867.5067 867.5067 0.0230 ? 868.0810 003 ; 003 ' ' 003 + ; , 1 Total 0.4533 3.6878 3.8742 0.0160 1.0236 0.0311 1.0548 0.2757 0.0296 0.3052 1,663.058 1,663.058 0.0920 1,665.359 5 5 9 9 2 3.5 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.4239 14.5184 12.4333 0.0189 0.8370 0.8370 0.7718 0.7718 i 1,872.550 1,872.550 0.5672 1,886.731 5 5 2 ., Paving 0.0865 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Z 0.0000 0.0000 ' ' 1 Total 1.5104 14.5184 12.4333 0.0189 0.8370 0.8370 0.7718 0.7718 1,872.550 1,872.550 0.5672 1,886.731 5 5 2 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 11 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio-CO2177:77771 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i: : AA 1 ' Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.5184 12.4333 Worker 0.0896 0.0609 0.7856 2.3200e- 0.2236 1.4800e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3600e- 0.0607 231.3351 131.3351 6.1300e- 231.4883 003 ; 003 003 ; i ; 003 1 Total 0.0896 0.0609 0.7856 2.3200e- 0.2236 1.4800e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3600e- 0.0607 231.3351 231.3351 6.1300e- 231.4883 11 1 5 75 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.4239 14.5184 12.4333 0.0189 0.8370 0.8370 0.7718 0.7718 ! 0.0000 1,872.550 1,872.550 0.5672 1,886.731 5 ; 5 2 i: Paving 0.0865 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 AA 1 ' Total 1.5104 14.5184 12.4333 0.0189 0.8370 0.8370 0.7718 0.7718 0.0000 1,872.550 1,872.550 0.5672 1,886.731 1 5 75 2 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio7Total I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 003 s Total Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8542 2.9700e- i 0.1506 Worker 0.0896 0.06090.7856 2.3200e- 0.2236 1.4800e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3600e- 0.0607 i 231.3351 231.3351 6.1300e- 231.4883 003 003 ; 003 i 003 0.0267 Total 0.0896 0.0609 0.7856 2.3200e- 0.2236 1.4800e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3600e- 0.0607 1 231.3351 231.3351 6.1300e- 231.4883 003 003 003 003 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio7Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 25.5129 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : Off -Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 i 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 003 s Total 25.8115 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 1 003 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PA110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio-7otal 1 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 O.000O 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -----------/ ------- ------- ------- ;------- ;------;---------------------------- y -- ---- -------T------- ------- -------'--•-----'-------'-------T"""-- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -------------�- ------ ------- ------- ------- -------T--- Worker 0.0672 0.0457 0.5892 1.7400e- 0.1677 1.11OOe- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 } 173.5014 173.5014 4.59OOe- 173.6162 003 003 ; 003 i ; 003 1 ' ' 1 ' ' Total 0.0672 0.0457 0.5892 1.7400e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 173.5014 173.5014 4.5900e- 11 173.6162 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 TCO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio-:)talCO2 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 25.5129 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000i 0.0000 0.0000 ------------------------------------ - - - - - - -------- - - - - - - -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.97OOe- 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 i 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 003 ' ' 1 Total 25.8115 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.0000 281.4485 261.4485 0.0267 282.1171 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I 1 1 Category Ib/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i :----------------------------------------- Worker Worker 0.0672 0.0457 0.5892 1.7400e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 _ + 173.5014 173.5014 4.5900e- 173.6162 003 ; 003 ; 003 + 003 ; : ' 1 Total 0.0672 0.0457 0.5892 1.7400e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 173.5014 173.5014 4.5900e- 173.6162 003 003 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Ph110 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day --- ----� ----------- - - F + Library 16.60 Other Non Asphalt Surfaces Ib/day 0.00 Mitigated 0.9252 3.1166 8.7365 0.0260 2.0710 0.0296 2.1005 0.5538 0.0278 0.5816 i 2,632.032 2,632.032 0.1285 2,635.244 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 0.00 0 • 0 0 2 _''''__... -er-------r------T------T------ 295.17 i ; 876,120 Unmitigated 1.0784 4.1244 12.8903 0.0423 3.4873 0.0471 3.344 0.9325 0.0443 0.9768 4,288.304 4.288.304 0.1925 _ 4,293.1172 3 3 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Library 651.26 539.05 i 295.17 1.475.325 876,120 .................................... - •• --- ----� ----------- - - F + Library 16.60 Other Non Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 44 ..................................... ------- --------F-----------+ ----------- --------------------- .......................�----------r---------r------ Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces • ................ ----------------------- Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 0.00 0 Total 651.26 539.05 295.17 1,475,325 876,120 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Library 16.60 8.40 6.90 52.00 43.00 i 5.00 44 44 12 .......................�----------r---------r------ Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces • ................ 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 i I 0.00 0 0 ------ 0 Parking Lot .---------- 16.60 -------- 8.40 ----------------------------- 6.90 0.00 0.00 -------- 0.00 -------- 0 ----------------------------- 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Library 0.552373• 0.044229: 0.211123: 0.1191121 0.017503 0.005797: 0.024455: 0.015685 0.001637] 0.0016331 0.004830: 0.0005831 1 , 0.001041 I Fugitive PM2.5 . . T------- T-------------- T------- ' T -------- ' T-------T-------T------- ' ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces • 0.552373• 0.0442291 0.2111231 0--------------�--------+------- 119112i 0.0175031 0.0057971 0.024455 i 0.0156851 0.001637i 0.0016331 0.004830i 0.0005831 0.001041 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ... - 4 ------------------4--------4---------------T-------T-------4--------- 4-------4--------T -------- Parking Lot 0.552373 • 0.044229- 0.211123, 0.119112: 0.017503' 0.005797 , 0.024455 , 0.015685 , 0.001637 , 0.001633 , 0.004830 , 0.000583' 0.001041 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 I Exhaust PM2.5 IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 INBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- + 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 Mitigated ; ; ; 004 ; 003 003 003 003 i ; 003 ; 003 i NaturalGas 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- r 154.5122T 154.5122T 2.9600e -Y 2.8300e-? 155.4304 Unmitigated 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG N CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NE3io- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 Ph110 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Library 1313.35 + 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- ' 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- ! 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 i, 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 - - - - - - - - - - - r --------------------------------------------------------------,,--------------T - - - - - - - y - - _ Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 O.OD00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i, - - Parkin Lot 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 O.OD00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' Total 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- ' ' ' ' 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 004 754.5122 003 003 2.8300e- 003 003 003 003 004 Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NE3io- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SUse PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Library 1.31335 is 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- ' 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- + 1!i4.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- ' 155.4304 i. ; 004 003 003 ; 003 003 , s ; 003 003 i, , , . , , i , , . , , Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 As Surfaces - - i. Parkin Lot 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Total 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 754.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 6.0 Area Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 24 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 I Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category Ib/day PM10 Ib/day Mitigated 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- + 0.0365 - 0.0365 1.000Oe- 0.0390 004 005 005 005 005 i 004 Ib/day i Architectural 0.0699 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 0.0365 0.0365 1.000Oe- 0.0390 --------------- ----- --------- _' 004 005 005 005 005 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I JPM2.5-rotal I SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 0.0699 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 Coating i i '_""'-__n-------I----------------------'-----------------------------------T-------'f --------------- ----- --------- _' Consumer 0.5077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 Products i i + Landscaping 1.6300e- 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 003 004 005 ; 005 005 005 0.0365 0.0365 1.000Oe- 0.0390 i 004 ; Total 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 0.0365 0.0365 1.000Oe- 0.0390 004 005 005 005 005 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 25 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM 10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 0.0699 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 0.5077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.6300e- ' 1.600Oe- ' 0.0172 0.0000 ' 6.00OOe- ' 6.00OOe- ' 6.00OOe- ' 6.00OOe- 0.0365 0.0365 1.00OOe- ' 0.0390 003 004 005 005 005 005 + 004 1 1 1 ' 1 ' Total 0.5792 1.60OOe- 0.0172 0.0000 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 0.0365 0.0365 1.00OOe- 0.0390 004 005 005 005 005 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 26 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:51 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Summer 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number ' Hours/Day I Hours/Year ( Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage T Floor Surface Area Population Library 11.58 1000sgft 0.27 22,860.00 0 •---------------P--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ---------------?------------------ --------------- Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 141.09 1000sqft 1 3.24 141,087.00 i 0 --------------------------------------------------------------- Parking Lot 14.31 1000s ft 0.33 14,307.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Climate Zone 8 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 (Ib/MWhr) Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Operational Year 2019 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter Project Characteristics - . Land Use - Phase 1- 22,860 sf library (11,584 sf building footprint), 79,137 sf of walkways & plazas, 61,950 sf of landscaping & open space, and a 14,307 sf parking lot. Construction Phase - Construction to start July 2017 and end December 2018. Demolition - Existing —22,750 sf Neighborhood Community Center to be demolished. Grading - Per developer, fill 3,997 cubic feet - cut 994 cubic feet = 3,033 cubic feet fill. 3,033 cubic feet = 111.2 cubic yards fill. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Lions Park is located in the downtown portion of the City of Costa Mesa. OCTA Route 43 stop Park -19th is across Park Avenue (-53 feet or —0.01 miles from project site). Water Mitigation - Per Green Building Standards. Waste Mitigation - AB 939 requires each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed 40 i 15 ----------------------------4---------------- tblConstructionPhase -----------r----------------------------- -------------------------- NumDays 18.00 i1 10.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Y tblConstructionPhase . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . .. ... Y------------------------------1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. - - - - - . . . . NumDa s 230.00 325.00 ---------------------------- Y tblConstruction Phase ----------------y ----------- r-----------------------------+-------------------------- NumDa s 8.00 25.00 -----------------------------Y---------------- tblCon structionPhase ----------- r -----------------------------t-------------------------- NumDay s 18.00 i 10.00 ............................. Y............................. tblGrading Y-----------------------------+-------------------------- AcresOfGrading 12.50 4.00 -----------------------------+ ----------------------------- 4 ------------------------------ Material Imported 0.00 111.20 ----------------------------- tblLandUse ----------g-p-----------------:-------------------------------t-------------------------- Buildin S aces uareFeet 11,580.00 1 22,860.00 ----------------------------- tblLandUse ---------------------------- Y -----------------------------f-------------------------- Buildin S acesquareFeet 141,090.00 i 141,087.00 -----------------------------_--------------------------- tblLandUse r------------------------------ -------------------------- BuildingS acesquareFeet 14,310.00 i 14,307.00 -----------------------------_ tblLandUse ---------------------------- r------------------------------}-------------------------- Land UseSquareFeet 11,580.00 i 22,860.00 ----------------------------- _ tblLandUse ---------------q------------- r-----------------------------+-------------------------- LandUseS uareFeet 141,090.00 i 141,087.00 -----------------------------_ tblLandUse ---------------------------- r----------------------------- -------------------------- LandUseSquareFeet 14,310.00 14,307.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2018 2019 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio-0O2FotalCO2 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 4.2402 44.5842 24.0427 0.0446 6.3697 2.2047 8.1493 3.3758 2.0532 5.0131 ! 0.0000 4,539.733 • 4,539.733 1.1268 0.0000 4,567.903 8 8 ; 2 ---- -----------------------------------------;-------------------------------------- _______ 2018 25.8872 27.1060 21.3347 0.0423 1.0236 1.5315 2.5551 0.2757 1.4400 T 1.7156 i 0.0000 4,218.405 4,218.405 0.7367 0.0000 T 4,236.824 i 9 9 2 1 1 • ' ' ' ' Maximum 25.8872 44.5842 24.0427 0.0446 6.3697 2.2047 8.1493 3.3758 2.0532 5.0131 0.0000 4,539.733 4,539.733 1.1268 0.0000 4,567.903 11 8 8 2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 4.2402 44.5842 24.0427 0.0446 2.5924 2.2047 4.3720 1.3453 2.0532 2.9826 + 0.0000 4,539.733 4,539.733 1.1268 0.0000 4,567.903 AA 8 8 2 --------------------- --------------------- ---� ----------------- ------ + ______ - _____ -_______ _______ 2018 25.8872 27.1060 21.3347 T -y ? 0.0423 1.0236 1.5315 2.5551 0.2757 1.4400 1.7156 0.0000 4,218.405 4,218.405 0.7367 0.0000 4,236.824 i 9 9 2 ' ' • , ' ' ' Maximum 25.8872 44.5842 24.0427 0.0446 2.5924 2.2047 4.3720 1.3453 2.0532 2.9826 0.0000 4,539.733 4„539.733 1.1268 0.0000 4,567.903 11 8 8 2 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.09 0.00 35.29 55.61 0.00 30.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PPA10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.51 INBio- Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- + 0.0365 - 0.0365 1.00OOe- 0.0390 004 ; 005 005 005 005 + 004 ; .+ i 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 Energy 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- i 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 004 003 CO3 003 003 003 003 1-------'-------;------1---------------'-------'-------'-------T------_--------,-------7-----------_ Mobile 1.0653 4.2429 12.4915 0.0404 3.4873 ? 0.0474 3.5347 0.9325 0.0446 0.9771 4,094.626 4,094.626 0.1925 4,099.440 1 1 1 6 6 1 , ' ' Total 1.6586 4.3718 12.6169 0.0412 3.4873 0.0572 3.5446 0.9325 0.0544 0.9870 2,665.921 4,249.175 4,249.175 0.1956 2.8300e- 4,254.909 11 6 6 4 4 4 003 5 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.51 INBio- Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- } 0.0365 - 0.0365 1.00OOe- 0.0390 004 005 005 ; 005 005 004 -------------------------------------------------�--------------r------- Energy 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- i 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 ------------ n---- ___ _______ ______________ _______------- '------- '---------------- T______-{___ Mobile 0.9152 3.1780 8.6929 0.0248 2.0710 0.0299 2.1009 0.5538 0.0281 0.5819 } -2,511.3729.2,511.3729, 0.1302 12,514.628 i 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 1.5086 3.3069 8.8183 0.0256 2.0710 0.0398 2.1107 0.5538 0.0380 0.5918 2,665.921 2,665.921 0.1333 2.8300e- 2,670.098 6 6 003 4 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 7/29/2017 :9/1/2017 5 25: '---- 3 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4 • Paving . • Paving :12/1/2018 : 12/14/2018 5 10 Percent 9.05 24.36 30.11 37.96 40.62 30.53 40.45 40.61 30.25 40.04 0.00 37.26 37.26 31.85 0.00 37.25 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 *Demolition -Demolition 7/1/2017 :7/28/2017 5 20: 2 .Grading ;Grading 7/29/2017 :9/1/2017 5 25: '---- 3 - :Building Construction .-----------------------I-----------------T :Building Construction -----------i------------� 9/2/2017 :11/30/2018 5: 325; 4 • Paving . • Paving :12/1/2018 : 12/14/2018 5 10 . 1.-----------'r------- - I 5 •Architectural Coating •Architectural Coating :12/15/2018 12/28/2018 5, 10, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 3.57 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 34,290; Non -Residential Outdoor: 11,430; Striped Parking Area: 9,324 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter ' Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition :Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 I 8.00 81 : 0.73 Demolition *Excavators 3I 8.00: 158 0.38 --------------------------- Demolition --------------------------- Tired Dozers F ---------------- ; -------------F :Rubber 21 8.00:247 0.40 Gradin :---------------------------F----------------;-------------F---------------------------r 'Excavators 9 1 1 8.00:158 0.38 ---------------------------- ------- - - Grading :Graders 1 �- 8.00 F 187 0.41 :-- ------------------------- F-----------------------------F------------------------------------------ Grading Rubber•Tired Dozers 1 i 8.00- 247: 0.40 Grading :---------------------------F---------------- •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ;-------------F---------------------------- 3� 8.00. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 97: 0.37 Building :---------------------------F---------------- ;-------------F---------------------------- -------------- 9 Construction Cranes 1. 7.00 231: 0.29 Building : ---------------------------F------- ----------------------- Construction 'Forklifts 3: 8.00: 89: 0.20 Building Construction 9 ---------------------------- 'Generator Sets F-----------------------------�F �1. 8.00 -------------- 84: 0.74 Building :---------------------------F----------------;- ----- -- F -------------- 9 Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 31 7.00 97: 0.37 Building :---------------------------F------- ------------- -------------- 9 Construction 'Welders 1 I 8.00:46 ; 0.45 ----------------------------• .---------------------------F---------------- ' Paving :Cement and Mortar Mixers 21 6.00- 9: 0.56 ---------------------------- Paving ---------------------------- F---------------- :Pavers 11----------8.00F 130 0.42 --------------------------- Paving ----------------------------F---------------- Paving Equipment 2i 6.00F_..._._ 132 0.36 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- F---------------- a -------------F---------------------------- -------------- Paving *Rollers 2: 6.00- 80' 0.38 ---------------------------- Paving --------------------------- F ----------------;-------------F - •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 11 8.00 97 0.37 ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------T------------4--------------�-------------- Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1; 6.00; 78; 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor I Hauling Count I Number Number I Number Length I Length I Length I Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 61 15.00' 0.001 103.00' 14.70 i 6.90: 20.001 LD_Mix 1 HDT_Mix :HHDT ------------------------------ ----------- 1--------------------- Exhaust -----------I----------4----------I--------------I--------------------- Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Grading 6 15.00' 0.001 14.00• 14.70 6.90; 20.001LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix 'HHDT i ------------------------------F----------I---------- +---- -----------------I----------4----------I--------------I----------T ------- Building Construction 91 75.00' 29.001 0.00' 14.70 6.90: 20.001 LD_Mix 1 HDT_Mix 1 HHDT ---------------------------------------+---------- F----------I 3 ; 3 ; 0 ----------- I----------' +---------- I--------------I----------T---------- 0.0388 1.1197 Paving 8 20.00' 0.001 0.00 14.70: 6.90: 20.001LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix 1HHDT --------------------------------4-----------r---------I---------r----------4-----------1---------- 3,951.107 -------------- ---------I---------- Architectural Coating 1 15.00' 0.00' 0.00• 14.70' 6.90' 20.00'LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 1.1197 0.0000 1.1197 0.1695 0.0000 0.1695 + 0.0000 0.0000 : Off -Road 4.1031 42.7475 23.0122 0.0388 2.1935 2.1935 2.0425 2.0425 ! 3,924.283 3,924.283 • 1.0730 3,951.107 3 ; 3 ; 0 Total 4.1031 42.7475 23.0122 0.0388 1.1197 2.1935 3.3132 0.1695 2.0425 2.2120 3,924.283 3,924.283 1.0730 3,951.107 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0534 1.7795 0.4137 4.0400e- 0.0897 0.0101 0.0998 0.0246 9.6400e- 0.0342 ! 446.2938 446.2938 0.0489 447.5158 003 ; 003 -----------------------------------r-------+ ------------;------------------- Off -Road 4.1031 427475 230122 00388 21935 21935 20425 2425 . . . . . . .0 0.0000 3,924.283 3,924.283 1.0730 T 3,951.107 -------- ------------------------ ------ i , Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 42.7475 23.0122 ----------�------4-------4-------4--003-- ------ ------ --------------T ------ Worker 0.0837 0.0573 0.6168 1.7000e- 0.1677 - 1.1200e- 0.'688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 i 169.1567 169.1567 4.9500e- 169.2805 003 ; ; 003 ' ' ' ; 003 ' ' ' Total 0.1371 1.8368 1.0305 5.7400e- 0.2574 0.0112 0.2685 0.0690 0.0107 0.0797 615.4505 615.4505 0.0538 616.7962 3 3 003 [::�r3,951.107 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PR710 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.4367 0.0000 0.4367 0.0661 0.0000 0.0661 i 0.0000 0.0000 ------------------------------ -----------------------------------r-------+ ------------;------------------- Off -Road 4.1031 427475 230122 00388 21935 21935 20425 2425 . . . . . . .0 0.0000 3,924.283 3,924.283 1.0730 T 3,951.107 + 3 3 0 1 ± t 1 Total 4.1031 42.7475 23.0122 2.1935 2.6301 0.0661 2.0425 2.1086 0.0000 3,924.283 3,924.283 1.0730 11 f-70.4367 3 3 [::�r3,951.107 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0534 1.7795 0.4137 4.0400e- 0.0897 0.0101 0.0998 0.0246 9.6400e- 0.0342 ! 446.2938 446.2938 0.0489 447.5158 003 ; 003 .6352 3,037.910 3,037.910 0.9308 3,061.180 Off -Road 3.0705 33.8868 17.1042 0.0297 1.7774 1.7774 1.63521 7 7 9 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 33.8868 AA .. 6.1923 Worker 0.0837 0.0573 0.6168 1.7000e- 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 : 169.1567 169.1567 4.9500e- 169.2805 003 003 ; 003 i ; 003 4.9639 : Total 0.1371 1.8368 1.0305 5.7400e- 0.2574 0.0112 0.2685 0.0690 0.0107 0.0797 615.4505 615.4505 0.0538 7 616.7962 1 j 9 003 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 6.1923 0.0000 6.1923 3.3286 0.0000 3.3286 s 0.0000 0.0000 ., i .6352 3,037.910 3,037.910 0.9308 3,061.180 Off -Road 3.0705 33.8868 17.1042 0.0297 1.7774 1.7774 1.63521 7 7 9 Total 3.0705 33.8868 17.1042 0.0297 6.1923 1.7774 7.9697 3.3286 1.6352 4.9639 3,037.910 3,037.910 0.9308 3,061.180 1 j 7 7 1 1 j 9 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- NBio- CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 7�otal Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 5.8000e- 0.1935 0.0450 4.4000e- 9.7500e- 1.1000e- 0.0109 2.6700e- 1.0500e- 3.7200e- + 48.5290 48.5290 5.3200e- 48.6619 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 : 003 ---------- ----------------+------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------r--- 3.070533.8868 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 y -- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. �-------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------T-------• -------------- Worker 0.0837 0.0573 ' 0.6168 1.7000e- ' 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 ------------- 169.1567 169.1567 4.9500e- 169.2805 003 003 003 + , 003 , 1 ' ' Total 0.0895 0.2508 0.6618 2.1400e- 0.1774 2.2200e- 0.1796 0.0471 2.0800e- 0.0492 217.6857 2'17.6857 0.0103 217.9424 g 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust Ph110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.51 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 2.4150 0.0000 2.4150 1.2982 0.0000 1.2982 i 0.0000 0.0000 ------------------------------------ ------- ------- ------- -------1---------------T - - - - - - - { - - - - - --,---------•-----�-------1-------T------- Off-Road 3.0705 33.8868 17.1042 0.0297 1.7774 1.7774 1.6352 1.6352 + 0.0000 ' 3,037.910 ' 3:037.910 ' 0.9308 3,061.180 7 7 9 1 i 1 ' ' ' Total 3.070533.8868 17.1042 0.0297 2.4150 1.7774 4.1924 1.2982 1.6352 2.9334 0.000 0 3,037.910 3,7.910 03 0.9308 3,061.180 11 17 7 g CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I JPM2.5-rotal INBio7tal 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 5.8000e- 0.1935 0.0450 4.4000e- 9.7500e- 1.1000e- 0.0109 2.6700e- 1.0500e- 3.7200e- + 48.5290 48.5290 5.3200e- 48.6619 003 ; ; 004 003 ; 003 003 ; 003 ; 003 i 003 ; .. Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 26.5546 18.1825 0.0269 : 1.7879 ____ _ Worker 0.0837 0.0573 0.6168 1.7000e- 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 169.1567 169.1567 4.9500e- ? 169.2805 003 ; 003 ; ; 003 ; i ; 003 ; 1 ' 2,650.979 Total 0.0895 0.2508 0.6618 2.1400e- 0.1774 2.2200e- 0.1796 0.0471 2.0800e- 0.0492 217.6857 217.6857 0.0103 7 217.9424 8 003 003 003 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust Bio -0O2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I JPM2.5-rotal INBio7tal Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 3.1149 26.5546 18.1825 0.0269 1.7879 1.7879 1.6791 1.6791 i 2,650.979 2,650.979 0.6531 2,667.307 7 7 8 1 1 Total 3.1149 26.5546 18.1825 0.0269 1.7879 1.7879 1.6791 1.6791 2,650.979 2,650.979 0.6531 2,667.307 7 7 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PR110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 Category lb/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 7 7 8 -------------------------------------003--1---------------------------- -- Vendor 0.1397 3.7003 1.1179 7.2100e- 0.1853 0.0327 0.2180 0.0533 0.0313 0.0846 ____ 780.2170 780.2170 0.0760 T 782.1161 Total 3.1149 ------------------------------------------ 18.1825 --------------------- ------ -------T--- --------------------------------------------+ Worker 0.4186 0.2863 3.0839 8.49OOe- 0.8383 5.5800e- 0.8439 0.2223 5.1400e- 0.2275 ± 845.7836 845.7836 0.0248 846.4023 003 003 ; 003 y , i y ' Total 0.5583 3.9866 4.2018 0.0157 1.0236 0.0383 1.0619 0.2757 0.0365 0.3121 1,626.000 1,626.000 0.1007 1,628.518 1 7 7 8 6 6 $ Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PIV10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 3.1149 26.5546 18.1825 0.0269 1.7879 1.7579 1.6791 1.6791 0.0000 - 2,650.979 2,650.979 0.6531 2,667.307 i 7 7 8 ' ' 1 a , ' ' Total 3.1149 26.5546 18.1825 0.0269 1.7879 1.7879 1.6791 1.6791 0.0000 2,650.979 2,650.979 0.6531 2,667.307 1 7 7 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.,5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.6795 . i i i Vendor 0.1397 3.7003 1.1179 7.2100e- 0.1853 0.0327 0.2180 0.0533 0.0313 0.0846 { 780.2170 780.2170 0.0760 782.1161 ' 003 1.4999 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ n----- __1 ------- 1------- 1------- .x------- 8 _ 1------- 1------- 1___--------------- y Worker 0.4186 0.2863 3.0839 8.4900e- 0.8383 5.58GOe- 0.8439 0.2223 5.1400e- 0.2275 s 845.7836 845.7836 0.0248 846.4023 003 003 ; 003 i a ' Total 0.5583 3.9866 4.2018 0.0157 1.0236 0.0383 1.0619 0.2757 0.0365 0.3121 1 1,626.000 1,626.000 0.1007 3 1,628.518 6 6 5 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 2.6795 23.3900 17.5804 0.0269 1.4999 1.4999 1.4099 1.4099 - 2,620.935 2,620.935 0.6421 2,636.988 1 1 3 ' 1 Total 2.6795 23.3900 17.5804 0.0269 1.4999 1.4999 1.4099 1.4099 2,620.935 2,620.935 0.6421 2,636.988 1 1 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust Ph110 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 CO2 CH4 11 N20 11 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 JNBio-0O217otal Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Total z 23.3900 ____ _ T Vendor 0.1226 3.4650 1.0188 7.1600e- 0.1853 0.0261 0.2114 0.0533 0.0249 0.0783 776.3727 776.3727 0.0728 778.1921 003 1.4999 --------_-_--------'-------'-------'--------------'------- -------;---------------T-------y"-- 1.4099 Worker 0.3783 0.2510 2.7354 8.2400e- 0.8383 5.5400e- 0.8439 0.2223 5.1000e- 0.2274 } 821.0980 821.0980 0.0218 821.6438 003 ; 003 003 1 1 1 ' Total 0.5009 3.7160 3.7542 0.0154 1.0236 0.0316 1.0552 0.2757 0.0300 0.3057 1,597.470 7597.470 0.0946 1 1,599.835 3 8 8 9 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 2.6795 23.3900 17.5804 0.0269 1.4999 1.4999 1.4099 1.4099 i 0.0000 2,620.935 2,620.935 0.6421 2,636.988 1 1 3 1 ' Total 2.6795 23.3900 17.5804 0.0269 1.4999 1.4999 1.4099 1.4099 0.0000 2,620.935 2,620.935 0.6421 2,636.988 1 1 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio7al I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5 5 ' 2 ..t -------------------------- -----,--------------,---------------------r-------+-------------- �------- n--------------- Vendor 0.1226 3.4650 1.0188 7.1600e- 0.1853 0.0261 0.2114 0.0533 0.0249 0.0783 i 776.3727 776.3727 0.0728 778.1921 003 i -------------------------------- ------------------------------------------r-------+------------------------ - Worker 0.3783 0.2510 2.7354 8.2400e- 0.8383 5.5400e- 0.8439 0.2223 5.1000e- 0.2274 821.0980 821.0980 0.0218 821.6438 ' 003 ; 003 ; 003 1 Total 0.5009 3.7160 3.7542 0.0154 1.0236 0.0316 1.0552 0.2757 0.0300 0.3057 1,597.470 1,597.470 0.0946 1,599.835 5 5 8 8 9 3.5 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.4239 14.5184 12.4333 0.0189 0.8370 0.8370 0.7718 0.7718 1,872.550 1,872.550 0.5672 1,886.731 5 5 ' 2 ..t Paving 0.0865 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 : i Total 1.5104 14.5184 12.4333 0.0189 0.8370 0.8370 0.7718 0.7718 1,872.550 1,872.550 0.5672 1,886.731 5 5 2 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Paving 0.0865 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1009 0.0669 0.7294 2.2000e- 0.2236 1.4800e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3600e- 0.0607 218.9595 218.9595 5.8200e- 219.1050 003 003 ; 003 A 003 0.8370 i ' ' Total 0.1009 0.0669 0.7294 2.2000e- 0.2236 1.4800e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3600e- 0.0607 218.9595 218.9595 5.8200e- 219.1050 5 5 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM 10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.4239 14.5184 12.4333 0.0189 0.8370 0.8370 0.7718 0.7718 + 0.0000 1,872.550 1.872.550 0.5672 1,886.731 i 5 5 2 i Paving 0.0865 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 1 ' 1 Total 1.5104 14.5184 12.4333 0.0189 0.8370 0.8370 0.7718 0.7718 0.0000 1,872.550 1.872.550 0.5672 1,886.731 5 5 2 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio7otal I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 S 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 003 : ' i ii i i i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.9700e- i Worker 0.1009 0.0669 0.7294 2.2000e- 0.2236 1.4800e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3600e- 0.0607 + 218.9595 218.9595 5.8200e- 219.1050 003 ; ; 003 003 i 003 Total 0.1009 0.0669 0.7294 2.2000e- 0.2236 1.4800e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3600e- 0.0607 218.9595 218.9595 5.8200e- 219.1050 11 1 003 003 003 1 003 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 25.5129 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 S 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 003 : ' Total 25.8115 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust Ph110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INB'07 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 .. i i ..____ --- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. A 2.0058 1.8542 Worker 0.0757 0.0502 0.5471 1.6500e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 41 164.2196 164.2196 4.3700e- 164.3288 003 003 ; 003 i 003 1 1 1 i ' ' ' Total 0.0757 0.0502 0.5471 1.6500e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 164.2196 164.2196 4.3700e- 164.3288 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 )tal CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INB'07 I I Category lb/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 25.5129 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Off -Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 ! 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.1171 003 ' i ' ' ' Total 25.8115 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 003 t282.1171 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 JNBi.- Category lb/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. i i i i i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. Worker 0.0757 0.0502 0.5471 1.6500e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 ' 164.2196 164.2196 4.3700e- 164.3288 003 003 ; 003 ; + 003 ' ' Total 0.0757 0.0502 0.5471 1.6500e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 164.2196 164.2196 4.3700e- 164.3288 003 003 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 I NBio- CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e Category ----------- --------- Ib/day Library Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 Ib/day 52.00 Mitigated 0.9152 3.1780 8.6929 0.0248 2.0710 0.0299 2.1009 0.5538 0.0281 0.5819 + 12,511.372912,511.3729, 0.1302 1 2,514.628 6.90 0.00 Total 651.26 539.05 295.17 1,475,325 9 Unmitigated 1.0653 4.2429 12.4915 0.0404 3.4873 0.0474 3.5347 0.9325 0.0446 0.9771 4,094.626 - 4,094.626 0.1925 4,099.440 ------- 6.90 -------Y 0.00 ....... 0.00 -------- 0.00 -------- 0 ---------------------- 0 6 6 1 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Library 651.26 539.05 295.17 1.475.325 876,120 .................................... -------------- --- ----------- --------- Pass -by Library Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 52.00 43.00 i ...................................... --------------H----------- ------- --------------------- 44 12 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 6.90 0.00 Total 651.26 539.05 295.17 1,475,325 876,120 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Library 16.60 8.40 6.90 52.00 43.00 i 5.00 44 44 12 Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0 0 0 .....ki...... • Parng Lot• •� -------- 16.60 ------ 8.40 ------- 6.90 -------Y 0.00 ....... 0.00 -------- 0.00 -------- 0 ---------------------- 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Library • 0.552373• 0.0442291 0.2111231 0.1191121 0.0175031 0.005797i 0.024455i 0.015685i 0.0016371 0.0016331 0.004830i 0.0005831 0.001041 Exhaust PM10 -- f -------- ------- f -------+------- f -------f------- f ------------------------- f-------� -------- Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.552373• 0.0442291 0.2111231 0.1191121 0.017503i 0.0057971 0.0244551 0.0156851 0.001637 0.001633i 0.004830 0.0005831 0.001041 . . . . . . . . . . ............. ........ -------- 4 -------- 4 --------- -------- 4--------T-------4 -------- 4 -------- --------- -------- 4----------------- ._--------------Parking CH4 ParkingLot 0.552373• 0.044229' 0.211123' 0.119112, 0.017503, 0.005797, 0.024455' 0.015685' 0.001637 0.001633: 0.004830' 0.000583, 0.001041 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 Mitigated 004 003 003 003 003 i 003 003 A NaturalGas 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 Unmitigated 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NElio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Library 1313.35 + 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7930e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- + 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 + 004 003 003 003 003 ± 003 003 +_ , ,_ , , , , , ______ ,_ , Other Non- 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i _ , ,_ ____ , , , + + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces _ , , , , , Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -- - - - - -i- - - - - - - -------�------- (--------------- + 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 ' ' ' Total 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 1;4.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NB,io- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day lb/day Library 1.31335 + 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- + 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 004 OC3 003 003 003 003 003 -----------------:--------------;--------------;--------------;-------;-------- - - - - - - -------+ -------;-------;--- Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; +; -----9---- ------.-------;------- ------- ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------;--- ----i-------r-------i -- - - - - -i- - - - - - - -------�------- (--------------- Parkin Lot 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 1 ' 1 1 i ' ' Total 0.0142 0.1288 0.1082 7.7000e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 9.7900e- 154.5122 154.5122 2.9600e- 2.8300e- 155.4304 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 6.0 Area Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 24 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 I Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category Ib/day PM10 Ib/day Mitigated 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- } AA 0.0365 - 0.0365 1.000Oe- 0.0390 004 ; ; ; ; 005 ; 005 ; ; 005 005 004 ; : Architectural 0.0699 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 0.0365 0.0365 1.000Oe- 7 0.0390 i 0.0000 0.0000 004 005 005 005 005 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 0.0699 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating + Consumer 0.5077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.6300e- 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 0.0365 0.0365 1.000Oe- 0.0390 003 004 ; ; ; ; 005 005 005 005 i ; ; 004 ; : Total 0.5792 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 0.0365 0.0365 11.0000e- 0.0390 004 005 005 005 005 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 25 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PA110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio-CO217otal Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 0.0699 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ; . i 8 Consumer 0.5077 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; ; . i i i i Landsca in 1.6300e- 1.6000e- 0.0172 0.0000 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 0.0365 0.0365 1.00OOe- 0.0390 003 004 005 005 005 005 ' ' i 004 ' Total 0.5792 1.6000e. 0.0172 0.0000 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- 0.0365 0.0365 1.00OOe- 0.0390 004 005 O05 005 005 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 26 of 26 Date: 1/26/2017 11:52 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Winter 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number ' Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation - ash /(6aau3 - bulpea0 - uogllowaa - juawdinb3 pea-j4O - juawdinb3 peoa-_4O - juawdinb3 peoa-}}O '(9 LOZ jagwaoad o} L LOZ AInr) L aseyd 6uunp in000 01 s}uawanoidwi alis -}}O - aseyd uoi;onj;suo0 -6uideospuel iapuiewaJ �R lsgL L'Z = 49 L— X 49tbL :Is05£'Z Ie;O; -any wlayeuy -6uideospuel aapulewai �R (sods 6�jd LZ sapnloui) 6ulned;sObZ'9L = 41} Z_ X 4095 :js0£b'LL le;o; -any Jed - asfl puel AINO SISAIVNV Noiion�JISNOO - sOIIS'J@loeaeyO;oafoad elea jjneJaa-uON T s;uewwoo paaaiu3 aasn n (i4MW/ql) (jUMW/ql) (j4MW/ql) 9000 /(;!sua;ul ON 6Z0'0 f4!su04ul WO V4'ZOL /q!sua;ul ZOO uosip3 eiujo;geo ujaglnog Auedwoo A;!mn 8602 jeakleuo!;eiad0 g auOza;ew!10 0£ (sAe(3) bajj uo!;e;!d!oaJd Z Z(s/w) peadg pu!M ueqjn uo!;ez!ueqjn s3lIslJal3eae43 Pafo,id J0440 Z'L 96esn PUe-1 v4 S311SIJ013BJe40 l38foad 0' I jemLunS'/(;unoo e6ue.!p AINO SISAIVNV NOuonNISN00 sIuawnoidwl alis -}}O -MJe-d suoi-1 M9 aawwnS '/(lunoo a6ueaO -AINO SISAIVNV NOu-mJlSNOO sjuawnoadwl a;is-}}O -Ted su011 6L89 INd 90'.£ LLOZ/9Z4 :a;eQ 1;O L abed L'£'9LOZ'POW33P:D :uoisaan POW33leO Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Water Mitigation - tblLandUse j BuildingSpaceSquareFeet j 18,410.00 j 18,415.00 I I I ---------------y------------------------r-----------------------j-------------- tblLandUse I BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 1 1,370.00 1 1,365.00 I I I tblLandUse I LandUseSquareFeet I 18,410.00 I 18,415.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------- tblLandUse , LandUseSquareFeet , 1,370.00 , 1,365.00 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O21NBio- Total CO21 ITotaICO21 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I CO2 I I Ib/day Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 1.3626 1 10.5321 1 8.1367 1 0.0134 1 0.5861 0.6101 1.0591 1I 0.0721 0.5648 1 0.6181 0.0000 � 1, 299.554111,299.5549 0.3080 I 0.0000 11,307.255 ,1 I1 Maximum 1.3626 10.5321 8.1367 0.0134 0.5861 0.6101 1.0591 0.0721 0.5648 0.6181 0.0000 1,299.554 1,299.5549 0.3080 0.0000 1,307.255 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 9 11,299.55491 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 Maximum 1.3626 1 9 0.0134 0.2627 1 1 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO21 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 I I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 1.3626 10.5321 8.1367 0.0134 0.2627 0.6101 0.8113 0.0534 0.5648 0.61811 0.0000 1,299.554 0.3080 0.0000 1,307.255 II II 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 9 11,299.55491 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 Maximum 1.3626 10.5321 8.1367 0.0134 0.2627 0.6101 0.8113 0.0534 0.5648 0.6181 0.0000 0.3080 0.00001,307.255 1 11,299.554 9 11,299.65491 1 1 l4HHl x!W laHI XRN (11100'OZ 106'9 1OL'46 100,0 100'0100'81 IL I 6wned -------t-------------------f--------f---------1-------------------------F-------�1------------i-----------=-- 14HH1 x!W laHI x!W O1I00'OZ 106'9 617L 100'0 1000 1009 IZ 1 uoi;ejedaid a}!S sselo sselo 99'016 —----------—--------- 1009 1b ------------ ----------— 6ulned I sJaxiW--=—.iepoW pue;uawa�l ----------------------- ----------------+ £'0 IL6 -----------r--------------------t-------------t--------------------t---------- 1008 16 I saoy�oe8/saapeol/sjo}oejll --- uoi;ejedaid a;ig 6b,0 lL8l 100'8 l l l s�ape��l uoi)ejedaJd GIG aio!yan alo!yan sselo y;6ua1 y}6ua1 y;6ua1 jagwnN idu jagwnN71JaNIOAA N }unoo I 86'99 6wlneH �opuan apiyan �aiho/� dul 6ugneH dul jopuan du I �a�l�onn i 6unneu du I Jo0uan ivauldlnh=i npnuln AIIIPKI Aspll� 1WA PUB s 1�l 0 IL6--------�0 ------ -----1 � i--I-----------------------8/sjapeol/sjo;oeu11 L----- 6uined saoy�loe-----------�-------------------=-- £,0 08 -----------42---------1----------1-- I 1 OO L b------------�---- I 1 —saapo�{1 6uine •------ -----------d I I Zb'0 10£ L 100'L I L 1—sJaned I —6wned 99'016 —----------—--------- 1009 1b ------------ ----------— 6ulned I sJaxiW--=—.iepoW pue;uawa�l ----------------------- ----------------+ £'0 IL6 -----------r--------------------t-------------t--------------------t---------- 1008 16 I saoy�oe8/saapeol/sjo}oejll --- uoi;ejedaid a;ig 6b,0 lL8l 100'8 l l l s�ape��l uoi)ejedaJd GIG Jo}oed peol Jan�od asJoH sjnoH 96esn }unowy ad�(1;uawciinb3 pea p aweN aseyd ;uaw !n 3 peoNjjo p :easy 6uiVed pedis;g :p :joop;no lel;ueplsaa-uON .p :aoopul lelluaplsON-uON :p :aoop4no lel;ueplsab `.p :aoopul leilueplseN 9ti'O :6ulned 10 saJ3V p :(aseyd 6ulpeJE)) 6ulpeJo 10 saJOy 9-0 :(aseyd uol;ejedaJd a;Ig) 6ulpejo jo sej3V aseyd uol;Oni;suoo jiejaa uoilonaisuoo 0'E uo!lan pat! Eazoo 00'0 00'0 00'0 00'0 00'0 00'0 00'0 96'SZ 04'SZ 00'0 86'99 00'0 00'0 00'0 00'0 ;uaaJad 1e3o1 9'ZWd S'ZWd Mol 06Wd 06Wd OZN MO ZOO11401 ZOO-o!8N Z03-0!8 9'ZWd 4sne4x3 an!316nj 0Md ;sne4x3 an!4!6nj ZOs 03 xON 0021 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.5303 N I I I I 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 I I 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 I I I 1 I I I Off -Road - 0.8524 10.5148 4 3533 9.7700e- 11 I I I I 0.4726 r 0.4726 -� I I I 0.4347 0.4347-�999.5201�999.5201 0.3063-� - ' 1,007.176 I I I I I I I I II I I I 003 I I I I I I I 1 I I 4 Total 0.8524 10.5148 4.3533 9.7700e- 0.5303 0.4726 1.0028 0.0573 0.4347 0.4920 999.5201 999.5201 0.3063 I 1 0.0000 1 -----I------I------d----- 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 1 I 1 0.0000 003 I I 0.0174 I I 1 0.2206 I I 1 6.000Oe- I 1 0.0559 3.7000e- I �-----+-----} 1 0.0563 I ( 0.0148 -F------d-----�----�------ 13.4000e- 1 1 11,007.176 4 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 I I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000I 0.0000 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I II --------- ------a------ Vendor N 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I ----- I 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 -----� I 0.0000 ----- I 0.0000 I - 0.0000 I ----- -----I------ I 0.0000 1 I 1 0.0000 1 -----I------I------d----- 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 1 I 1 0.0000 II II -- {------4------------�----- Worker 0.0248 I I 0.0174 I I 1 0.2206 I I 1 6.000Oe- I 1 0.0559 3.7000e- I �-----+-----} 1 0.0563 I ( 0.0148 -F------d-----�----�------ 13.4000e- I 1 0.0152 1 I 1 59.5688 I I 59.5688 1 1.7300e I ---�---- 1 I 1 59.6121 11 ( = 004 004 I I I 004 003 I I Total 0.0248 0.0174 0.2206 6.000Oe- 0.0559 3.7000e- 0.0563 0.0148 3.4000e- 0.0152 59.5688 59.5688 1.7300e- 59.6121 004 004 004 003 alig-}}o uoilonj;suoo pale -!I W b £00 1 400 400 coo 400 1 LWO I 6M'69 £90£'0 -800£L'L 8899'69 8999'69 MOT -80004'£ 8440'0 £990'0 -8000L'£ 6990'0 -90000'9 90ZZ'0 b1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I EOD 8420'0 18301 ------8---------- I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 0000'0 I I I 0000'0 I I I £ZZO'0 I 0000'0 1 £ZZ0'0 I 8902'0 I 0000'0 1 890Z'0 I I I I II ;sn0 an1;I6nd FeP/ql ALp/ql 1 I £00 I I I I boo I I b00 I b00 I I I N -LL 2-L9 -----�------I----- I a00EL L I 8899'69 {------�------¢------�------+ I 8895'69 I Z9L0'0 I I -a000bE -----{ I 8410'0 ------ £9So'0 ------------ -9000L'£ 6990'0 +----- -90000'9 -----4-----+-----+----- 90ZZ'0 bLLO'O 8bZ0'0 --------- 0 00 001_ I --_ 1 0000 01 I 0 0000 I 00000 I I 00 _� 00.0_ I 00000 I 1 00000 I 1 00000 -L 1 I 0000_0 I I 1 0000_0 1 I I 0000_0 1 I I 0000_0 I I l 0000_0 1_00000 I II I II __L__ JopuaA--- I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 0000'0 1 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 I 1 ' 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 I 1 0000'0 I 1 0000'0 I II 1 0000'0 11 builneH AL,p/ql LeP/ql E9;I'ZVVd tio6a;e0 ZOO S'ZWd 9'ZWd 18101 OLWd OHM 8200 OZN bH0 20018301 -U9N ZOO-01 ;snLgx3 9nl;l6nd OLyyd ;sneyx3 9nl;I6nd ZOS 00 xON 0023 alig-}}o uoilonj;suoo pale -!I W b alis-uo uoi;onj;suoo pa;e -!I W 1 coo 9LL'LOWL £90£'0 LOZ9'666 LOZ9'666 0000'0 LL917'0 L4£4'0 £ZZ0'0 b6L9'0 9ZLb'0 8902'0 -a00LL'6 ££9£'4 8bL9'OL bZ98'0 le3ol b1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I EOD I II 9LL'L00'L I £90£'0 I LOZ9'666 I LOZ9'666I 0000'0 1 Lb£b'0 I LbEb'0 I I gZL4'o I gZLb'0 I I-a00LL'6 I ££S£'b I 8KTU I 4Z98'0 8 PeoN-:40 --------- i-----------7------1------------1------i------------H•----------- ------8---------- I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 0000'0 I I I 0000'0 I I I £ZZO'0 I 0000'0 1 £ZZ0'0 I 8902'0 I 0000'0 1 890Z'0 I I I I II ;sn0 an1;I6nd FeP/ql ALp/ql tio6a;e ZOO ZOO lelol S'ZWd S'ZWd Ielol OLWd OLWd aZ00 OZN bH0 20018301 ZOO-018 9'ZWd lsneyx3 an1;I6r OLWd lsneyx3 aml16nd ZOS 00 -ON 0021 alis-uo uoi;onj;suoo pa;e -!I W 3.3 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO21 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I I I PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ITotaICO2 CO2 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 11 1.0532 1 9.9754 1 7.3425 1 0.0113 I I 0.6087 I 0.6087 I I 0.5636 1 0.5636 1 11,085.10711,085.10711 0.3018 1 11,092.651 U I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 5 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 II 0.0000III in 11 n 0.2201 1 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 n I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I Total 1.2733 9.9754 7.3425 0.0113 I0.00001 1 0.6087 0.6087 II 0.5636 0.5636 1,085.107 1,085.1071 0.3018 13400e1-0.2025 1,092.651 1 0.0534 I I I I I -77FI6.24 I 1 --- I 4.606Worker--i0.0893 1 003 5 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio CH4 N20 CO2e I I 1 PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotaICO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling n 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 000.0.0____ I 0.0000 1 II 0.0000III 0.0000 II 0.0000 0T 00I I 0.0000 .007_000er__0 0 II 0.0000 I . I III0.0000I I 0.0000 I I0.00001 1 I 0.000000 I 0.0000_Vnd I II ---- ----2 I 21500e- I .01 13400e1-0.2025 1 0.0534 I I I I I -77FI6.24 I 1 --- I 4.606Worker--i0.0893 003 1 003 I 1 003 I I I I 1 003 I I I I Total 0.0893 0.0625 0.7942 2.1500e- 0.2012 1.3400e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 214.4477 214.4477 6.2400e- 214.6036 003 003 003 003 alis -}}o uoil3njlsuoC) pole -!4-!W S' F99 £00 L I £00 I £00 £00 9£09'11LZ 0£ -00011Z'9 LL"'KZ LL"'44Z 9450'0 -a00£Z'L 4£90'0 9ZOZ'0 -0004£'L ZL0Z'0 -0009L'Z Z46L'0 SZ90'0 £680'0 lelol 9 i II I coo 1 I I LLbb"b I I j I 9b90'0 I coo 00--- I i I I coo 1 I I I coo Ia00S1'Z II I1 -E0 -9 -'b -LZ - - ---------- -----I -1 Zb6L'01I SZ90'0 -------� E680'0III ---�a-��-on-a00bZ'9 - --- 0000 o I I 1 0000 ,0 I 1 0000,0 I 1 0000'0 I I I 0000,0 I I 0000 o I I 0000 0 I 0000 0 I 1 0000 o I 1 00000 i 1 0000'0 02. I 1 0000 o 02. I I 0000 0 0 I II 0000 0 ;1 aopuan - ------------ I ;sneyx3 ------I------�------------ 0LAd !sneyx3 ------� ------ ----- ----- ------ ----- ---- 0000'-- ---------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0000-0 1 1 0000'0 1 0000-0 1 0000'0 1 1 0000' 0 1 0000' 0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000.0 1 0000.0 0000.0 1 0000-0 I 1 0000-0 I II 1 0000'0 11 6ul lne H .1 (ep/ql Aep/ql fjoBele0 ZOO 1e101 S'ZWd S'ZWd 1e301 I OLWd aZ00 OZN 17H0 ZOOle301 -ol N Z00-019 S'ZWd ;sneyx3 and;!find pLWd ;sneyx3 and;!find771177 XON 9021 alis -}}o uoil3njlsuoC) pole -!4-!W S' F99 L 0£ LL LL L809'0 £O £Z'L 1e101 I 1 I I I I 1 I --- 0000'0 I I I 0000'0 I I — ----- I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 0000'0 I 0000'0 1 1 0000'0 I 0000'0 I I I I II I I I I II I 1 I LOZZ'0 II 6wned L99760'LI 8L0£'0 LLOL'980'L 101'980'L 0000'0 9£95'0 9£950 L809'0 L809'0 l ELLO'0 9ZbE'L 17SL6'6 I ZESO'L 11 PeOH-1;0 (ep/ql Aep/ql tio6a;e0 ZOO 18101 S'ZWd S'ZWd 18101 OLWd OLWd 1 I aZ00 OZN bH0 ZOOle301 olBN ZOO -0l8 S'ZWd ;sneyx3 and;l6n3 0LAd !sneyx3 ZOS 00 XON JOa alis-uo uoilonilsuoo pale il!W CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 1/26/2017 3:06 PM 6819 Lions Park- Off-site Improvments CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS ONLY - Orange County, Winter 6819 Lions Park- Off-site Improvments CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS ONLY Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2018 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS ONLY Land Use - Park Ave- total 17,430sf: 580ft x —28ft = 16,240sf paving (includes 27 prkg spcs) & remainder landscaping. Anaheim Ave- total 2,350sf: 145ft x —15ft = 2,175sf & remainder landscaping. Construction Phase - Off-site improvements to occur during Phase 1 (July 2017 to December 2018). Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - Energy Use - 0 1 IZ960'99Z'L Z I I I 88L'96Z'L 0000'0 6L0£'0 BZ' I. 960'98Z, 1, 0000'0 MTM 8499'0 4£90'0 ELL8'0 LOL9'0 LZ9Z'0 ££40'0 9280'8 6££S'OL 8£L£'L wnwixeyy p I I I I 1 Z 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 II 88L'96Z'L 0000'0 I 6L0£'O IZS60'88Z'LI960'98Z'L I 0000'0 I 1819'0 I 8495'0 I VC90'0 I £LL8'0 I L019'0 I LZ9Z'O I ££LO'O ( 9Z80'8 I 6£E9'0L I 8£L£'L II LLOZ (ep/ql Aep/ql J80A L690'L LOL9'0 L989'0 E£LO'0 =zo,) 6££9'01 lelol71-9474yxd AePlgl S'ZWd le301 I OLWd I OLWd I ZOO -ZOO OZN VHS ZOO MINd -018 9'ZWdan1;I6nd OLWd ;sneyx3 anl;l6ndZOS 4HQ 00 xON JOH lsneyx3 uoi;onilsuoo pa;e Iliw 0 1 IZ960'99Z'L z I I 88L'96Z'L 0000'0 6LOE'0 960'88Z'L 0000'0 LSL9'0 8495'0 LZLO'0 1,6901 1,069'0 08S'0 E£LO'0 9280'8 6£ES'OL 8£L£'L wnwixeW 1 IZ560'88Z'L1960'88Z'11 Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I II I (1 88L'S6Z'LI 0000'0 6L0£'O 0000'0 L8L9'0 8499'0 LZLO'0 L690'L LOL9'0 L989'0 E£LO'0 9Z80'8 6££9'01 8£L£'L LLOZ AePlgl �(eP/ql jea,, ZOO S'ZWd S'ZWd 18301 OLWd MINd azoo OZN 4HQ ZOO1e301 -018N .ZWc ZOO -018 S'ZWd lsneyx3 aA1;I6nd OLWd lsneyx3 ant;I6nd707 00 xON `J021 uollowlsuoo pa;e i;iwun (u0lsslw3 A1!8(3 wnwlxew) uol;onajsuo:D IIBJOAO L -Z fiewwnS suoissiw3 0'Z 00'OLE'L _ 1 laa_�ajenbSasnpuel i asnpuelp 00'SL4'Sl ; 00'014'8l ;aaHajenbSas(lpue-1 as OO,OL£' L asnpuellgl 00'4L4'8L----1OOOL'8I lea:- ------- ajenbSaoecIS6ulplm8 I asnpuelp - UO4e6iIiW Ja}eM - uoliebiuy ash puej aligow - uolje6i}iW;uawdinbD peoi-go uoi}oni}suoo 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBlo-0O2 TotalCO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 971 0.3 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 6.901 20.00jLD_Mix IHDT_Mix IHHDT 1 I I I I_ --------------r-----------y--------rt--------1--------------- Paving 1 71 18.001 0.00 0.00 14.70 I I I I -------y--------I-----------t--------y------- 6.901 20.00 LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix IHHDT Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.18 0.00 23.40 25.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num DaysNum Days Phase Description Number 187 0.41 Week ----------I Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes i 1 8.00 1 (Site Preparation ISite Preparation 19/2/2017 19/4/2017 I 51 11 ------1-------------------1------------------A----------i----------L------L------L------------------- 2 Paving iPaving 9/5/2017 19/11/2017 1 51 51 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.45 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 Off Road Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation (Graders 1 1i 8.001 187 0.41 -----------------------I---- Site Preparation ----------I Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes i 1 8.00 I ------------- 97 0.37 Paving ent and Mortar Mixers -4 4i 6.00 Cme 9i 0.56 Paving -------------------Pavers---------------------------- ----------- ------------ -I---------------------�-------------1----------t----------1----------- Paving I ------------------I it 7.00 Rollers 1 7.001 130-------- 0.42 801 0.38 ------------------------ Paving L-------------------- --------------4----------4----------4----------- Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 1 1 7.00 971 0.3 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number I Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Vehicle Class Class Site Preparation 1 21 5.001 0.001 0.001 14.701 6.901 20.00jLD_Mix IHDT_Mix IHHDT 1 I I I I_ --------------r-----------y--------rt--------1--------------- Paving 1 71 18.001 0.00 0.00 14.70 I I I I -------y--------I-----------t--------y------- 6.901 20.00 LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix IHHDT a;is-}10 uoi;onjisuoo pa;e i;iwun 1' £00 LZ6110 400 b00 400 89Z4'9S a00S9'6 9S8E'9S 9S8E'9S ZS 60'0 -8000Y'E 8460'0 £990'0 -0000L'E 65S0'0 a000L'9 99OZ'0 6660'0 6LZ0'0 le30l I I i I I LeP/ql /uo6ale0 89Z4'9S -----P------1------f— I I I i £00 I a00S9'6 I I I 998£'99 s8c.gs I I 998C.99 --- ----- I I I I I I ZSLO'0 -----------t-----t-----t-----t-----t-----t-----4-----t— I I I b00 I-a0004'E I I I BblO'0 I I I E9S0'0 I I 400 I-a000L'£ I I I 6990'0 I I b00 I a000L'S I I I 9SOZ'0 I I I 6660'D 6---f-----�F I II I II I 6GZ0'0 N ia�joM ---------- —00-0-0'-0— -----j I --00-0-0'0--j I 0000'0 I p1I 0000'0 �II I I 11 —0-00--0 —fi1I I 1 I —0-0-00—'0— 1 t1I —0-0-00—'0— I r1I —0-0-00—'0—rt I —0-0-00—'0— I r11 —0-00-0—'0—Y1I I —0-0-00—'0— I t1I —0-0-00—'0— 1 t1I —0-0-00—'—rt1I I II N --00-00—'0— —N------ ---Jo—p—ua—A—-- 0000'0 I I 0000'0 1 0000'0 I 0000'0 1 1 0000'0 I I 0000'0 I I 0000'0 I 1 0000'0 I I 0000'0 I I I 0000'0 I 0000'0 I I 0000'0 I 1 0000.0 I II I 0000'0 II 6u!IneH AeP/ql ReP/ql tio6ale0 I ZOO lelol S'ZWd S'ZWd lelol O6Wd 06Wd aZ00 OZN 4H0 Z001e3o1 -018N Z00 0!8 S'ZWd 3sneyx3 an!;!find O6Wd 3sneyx3 an!;!find ZOS 00 -ON J021 a;is-}10 uoi;onjisuoo pa;e i;iwun 1' LZ6110 E00 9L6'LOO`6 E90E'O 60ZS'666 MS'666 L4E4'O ELSO'O 8Z00'6 9ZL4'0 £0£910 a00LL'6 EESE'9 8465'06 4ZS8'01e4ol b I I I I I I I I I I I I coo I I I II I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I_ I I I II 9L6'L00'6 £90£'0 60ZS'666 60ZS'666 L4E4'0 L4E4'0 9ZL4'0 9ZL4'0 a00LL'6 E£S£'b 8465'06 4ZS8'0 Peoa-110 -----0------------�------a------�------0------1'-----�------�------F-----------'�------�-----F-----�------r--------- I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I N ( OOOD'01 I 0000'0 I I I ELSO'O I 0000'0 1 EL90'0 1 EOES'0 I 0000'0 I EO£5'0 I I I I ® lsn J an!;!find IIep/ql LeP/ql /uo6ale0 I I l7nOlelol ZOO lelol I S'ZWd S'ZWd le;ol O6Wd 06Wd ozoo OZN 4H0 -018N ZOO -o!8 S'ZWd ;sne4x3 an!;!find 06Wd 3sneyx3 an!;I6nd Z0g 00 xON OON ei!s-up uoilona;suoo pa;e !j! un- L�OZ - uoijejedWd a31S Z'£ spend panedun uo peadS 910iyan aonpad eajy posodxEl jaleM uoijon.ilsuo:0 sainseeW uoijeBijiw �-g Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust II I I I I 0.2068 1 0.0000 1 0.2068 0.0223 1 0.0000 1 0.0223 1 I 1 0.0000 1 ( I 0.0000 A I I I I I I I I II I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I --------- ------+------+----- -----+-----+----- r+----------+------>------{------0------t------F----��----- Off-Road II 0.8524 1 10.5148 1 4.3533 1 9.7700e- 1 ( 0.4726 0.4726 1 1 0.4347 (77 0.4347 1 0.0000 1 999.5201 1 999.5201 1 0.3063 1 11,007.176 I1 II j 003 I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 Total 0.8524 10.5148 4.3633 9.7700e- 0.2068 0.4726 0.6794 0.0223 0.4347 0.4571 0.0000 999.5201 999.6201 0.3063 I _____ III 1,007.176 I I __ T -- I 0.0_0_00 I I I ITI 0000TIII 003 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 . 00279-91 1 1 1 1 1 4 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 =0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 II 0.0000 vWeonrdkoer 0.0000 IIII I 0.0000 I1 I II .00 I r II 0.00T0000TI_0____ ! 0 I .0000T0.0000 I _____ III I _____ 0.0000 rIII I I __ T -- I 0.0_0_00 I I I ITI 0000TIII I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 . 00279-91 0.2056 5.7000e- 0.059 700 e 6 0 e 2 -�538�35�100e+- 6686 65 56.4268r- 0 004 004 j i I I 004 j I I I j 003 j Total 0.0279 0.0191 0.2056 5.7000e- 0.0559 3.7000e- 0.0563 0.0148 3.4000e- 0.0152 56.3856 66.3866 1.6500e- 56.4268 004 004 004 003 a;is-}}p uoilona;suoo pa;e muaun- s £00 LOV990'10V�80dS £00 £00 £00 99E4'£OZ 00046'9 4886'Z0Z 4886'ZOZ 9450'0 a00£Z'4 4£90'0 9ZOZ'0 -000414 Z40Z'0 -8001'0-z404L'0 4SL6'6 L890'0 5004'0 lelol I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I II I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I n 0 I I I 0000'0 I I I 0000'0 I 0000'0 I I 0000'0 I 0000'0 I I I I I LOZZ'0 n 6u!ned --{------1------t-----�-----f------F------�------ F------F------F-----+-----• -- — 1 £00 I I I I i £00 I I I £00 I I I £o0 ( I I II L86_OZ 886ZOZ 0'0_ ----��a00£Z'94 — T_-_ 4£900 SZOZ0 -- — — — -r— I ZL— — I r -——0'Z I —L04L'0 I L890Y0 I 8 —SOOL'0_--�al�oM--- 00_000----J-0000 I I 0-0000 I O I �000" 00---- I I I � 00000—L I 1I 0000-0 I l 0000_0 y I I 0000_0 y I I 0000_0 I I 1 0000_0 I I 0000_00 L 0 y I I 00oL00o I I 00�-0000 y I n I n 0� -- �opuan--- 4H0 I I 1 S"ZWd I I I I I 1 I I I I I n i i i i i i i i 0000'0 0000"0 0000'0 0000'0=666616 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 n 0000'0 6u11neH /ep/QI Aep/91 tiobale0 ZOO 18301 97Wd S'ZWd Mol OLWd OLWd aZ00 OZN 4H0 ZOOlelol -o19N ZOO -018 S"ZWd 3sne4x3 anll!6nj OLWd lsneyx3 anlll6nj ZOS 00 XON `JOM a;is-}}p uoilona;suoo pa;e muaun- s LOV990'10V�80dS S9'Z60`4 12�LO 840£'0 9£99'0 9£99'0 L809'0 L809'0 £440'0 SZ4E'L 4SL6'6 ££LZ'4 18301 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I II I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I n 0 I I I 0000'0 I I I 0000'0 I 0000'0 I I 0000'0 I 0000'0 I I I I I LOZZ'0 n 6u!ned --{------1------t-----�-----f------F------�------ F------F------F-----+-----• -- — 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I n 9 I I I L I I I I I I I I I I I n L99760'LI 1 SLO£"0 ILLOL'S80'LILOL'S80'LI I 9£99'0 I 9£99'0 11 I L809"0 I L809'0 I I £LLO'0 I SZ4£'L I 4SL6'6 I Z£SO'L I) Peo2l-330 /ep/41 step/QI tio6ale0 ZOO 18301 S'ZWd S'ZWd lelol OLWd OLWd I I aZ00 OZN 4H0 ZOO lel0l -o!8N ZOO -o!8 S"ZWd 3sneyx3 an!ll6nj OLWd lsneyx3 anll!6nj ZOS 00 XON 0021 �j a;is-uo uoi;onj;suoo pa;e il!Wun LHOZ - BUTALd CT Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.0532 9.9754 7.3425 0.0113 0.6087 0.6087 0.5636 0.5636 0.0000 1,085.107 1,085.1071I 0.3018 1,092.651 II I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I 5 ---------- ------------E-----}------4-----+-----a------4------�------E------------�------4------�------ ----- PI awng p 0.2201 ( I I 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 II I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total 1.2733 9.9754 7.3425 0.0113 0.6087 0.6087 0 0.5636 0.5636 0.0000 i 0c+6-(0-00-0-4-0- i . 0.3018 �I I 0.0000 y i -----t I i ) 00000 I 00- - - - - 000.0000 91I -0-.0000 0.0000 0.070 i 1i-0-.00-0- I I 0.0000 Worker - 0.1005 1 11,085.107 1 11,085.10711 0.2012 I 1 11,092.661 5 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.000-0 0 i i 0c+6-(0-00-0-4-0- i . i I .0000 �I I 0.0000 y i -----t I i ) 00000 I 00- - - - - 000.0000 91I -0-.0000 0.0000 0.070 i 1i-0-.00-0- I I 0.0000 Worker - 0.1005 0.0687 0.7401 �2.0400e-� j 003 0.2012 I 1.3400e-� 003 0.2025 j 0.0534 j 1.2300e-� 003 0.0546-�202.9881�202.9881 I �5.9400e-� j 003 - 203.1366 I I I Total 0.1005 0.0687 0.7401 2.0400e- 0.2012 1.3400e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- ---J202.9881 0.0546 202.9881 5.9400e- 203.1366 003 003 003 1 003 1 1 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 22 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 Orange County, Summer Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 0.54 1000sgft 0.01 541.00 i 0 -----------------------------:-------------------------------------------------------------4 ----------------r------------------1--------------- Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 36.15 1000sgft 0.83 36,152.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) Climate Zone 8 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Operational Year 2020 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer Project Characteristics - . Land Use - Phase 2- new 9,281 sf NCC building by renovation/expansion of existing 8,740 sf library = 541 sf newly construced portion of building, 28,553 sf walkways/plazas, & 7,599 sf landscaping/OS. Construction Phase - Construction to start February 2019 and end February 2020. Demolition - Grading - In land use section Phase 1 estimated as --0.86 acres. Per developer, cut 156 cubic feet - fill 80 cubic feet = 76 cubic feet cut. 76 cubic feet = 2.81 cubic yards cut. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Lions Park is located in downtown City of Costa Mesa. OCTA Route 43 stop Park -19th located across Park Avenue (-53 feet or 0.01 miles from site). Water Mitigation - Per California Green Building Standards. Waste Mitigation - AB 939 requires each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills. Table Name Column Name Default Value I New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed 40 i 15 ----------------------------- ------------------------------ tblGrading AcresOfGrading _----------------------------- 0.00 1 0.86 •---------------------------- ------------------------------ r----------------------------- tblGrading Materia lExported 0.00 1 2.81 ------------ — -------------------- tblProjectCharacteristics Operationaffear 2018 2020 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust Exhaust PA410 Fugitive haus Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total IL77O2 Year Ib/day Ib/day 2019 1.0419 10.5421 8.2583 0.0146 1.3207 0.6111 1.8585 0.4927 0.5624 1.0058 i 0.0000 1,460.372 1,460.372 0.3748 0.0000 1,469.741 i 0 0 0 i 2020 3.2683 9.5137 8.0434 0.0145 0.2060 0.5267 0.7327 0.0555 0.4847 0.5402 ± 0.0000 1,429.162 1,429.162 0.3736 0.0000 1,438.502 i 0 0 2 1 ' ' ' Maximum 3.2683 10.5421 8.2583 0.0146 1.3207 0.6111 1.8585 0.4927 0.5624 1.0058 0.0000 1,460.372 1,460.372 0.3748 0.0000 1,469.741 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PNI10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year Ib/day Ib/day 2019 1.0419 10.5421 8.2583 0.0146 0.5833 0.6111 1.1211 0.2102 0.5624 0.7234 } 0.0000 1,460.372 1,460.372 0.3748 0.0000 1,469.741 0 0 0 ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------r--- ______ _____--------------------- 2020 3.2683 9.5137 8.0434 0.0145 0.2060 0.5267 0.7327 0.0555 0.4847 0.5402 } 0.0000 1,429.162 1,429.162 0.3736 0.0000 T 1,438.502 0 0 2 1 1 • ' ' Maximum 3.2683 421 10.52583 8. 0.0146 0.5833 0.6111 1.1211 0.2102 0.5624 0.7234 0.0000 1,460.372 1,460.372 0.3748 0.0000 1,469.741 0 0 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.30 0.00 28.46 51.53 0.00 18.27 0.00 0.00 iD.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- + 8.03OOe- 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 005 ; 003 ; ; 005 005 ; 005 005 i 003 ; 003 ; 005 003 ., s------- --------------------------------------- Energy 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe 3.000Oe 1.6103 004 003 003 ; 005 004 004 004 ; 004 j ; 005 005 ., , s, Mobile 9.9700e- 0.0404 0.1326 4.8000e- 0.0408 4.7000e- 0.0412 0.0109 4.4000e- 0.0113 48.2720 48.2720 2.0200e- 48.3225 003 ; 004 ; 004 ; 004 ; S 003 •' , s Total 0.0381 0.0417 0.1375 4.9000e- 0.0408 5.8000e- 0.0414 0.0109 5.5000e- 0.0115 49.8808 49.8808 2.0700e- 3.000Oe- 49.9414 004 004 003 004 003 003 005 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.77OOe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- } 8.03OOe- - 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 ., , , Energy 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- AA 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 ., , Mobile 8.3800e- 0.0303 0.0891 3.000Oe- 0.0247 3.000Oe- 0.0250 - 6.6100e- - 2.8000e- 6.8800e- i 30.0121 - 30.0121 1.3400e- - 30.0456 003 004 004 003 004 003 : 003 •, ' Total 0.0365 0.0317 0.0939 3.1000e- 0.0247 4.1000e- 0.0251 6.6100e- 3.9000e- 6.9900e- 31.6209 31.6209 1.3900e- 3.000Oe- 31.6645 004 004 003 004 003 003 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 2 :Building Construction :Building Construction 2/7/2019 :1/31/2020 5: PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 3 -Paving :Paving 2/1/2020 :2/14/2020 5: 5: -------------------------------------------------------4-------------'r----------- --------I-------- — ------------------------- Percent 4.17 24.14 31.67 36.73 39.39 29.31 39.27 39.36 29.09 38.95 0.00 36.61 36.61 32.85 0.00 36.60 Reduction 1 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 :Grading :Grading 12/1/2019 '2/6/2019 ' 5 2' ------I------------------------------------------------I------------4------------4--------4--------T------------------------- 2 :Building Construction :Building Construction 2/7/2019 :1/31/2020 5: 100: ------------------------------------------------I------------4------------4--------4---------------------------------- 3 -Paving :Paving 2/1/2020 :2/14/2020 5: 5: -------------------------------------------------------4-------------'r----------- --------I-------- — ------------------------- 4 :Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 2/15/2020 2/28/2020 5: 5 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.86 Acres of Paving: 0.83 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 812; Non -Residential Outdoor: 271; Striped Parking Area: 2,169 (Architectural Coating — sgft) Off Road Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Grading :Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 i 8.00, 81: 0.73 ------------------------------------------------------- F ---------------- ;------------ I -- Hauling Trip Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 i 1.00:247 : 0.40 ----------------------------- --------------------------- F---------------- ;------------- F........................... r -------------- Number Grading •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 21 6.00 , 97 : 0.37 --------------------------------------------------------- F---------------- ;------------- h---------------------------�-------------- Building Construction Cranes 1 i 4.00 - 231: 0.29 -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 4 --- - ---------I---------------------------- Building Construction •Forklifts 2i 6.00, 89: 0.20 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------1-------------F------------------------------------------ 0.00. 14.70 Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2= 8.00- 97: 0.37 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------1-------------I------------------------------------------ ---------I- Paving •Cement and Mortar Mixers 41 6.00- 9: 0.56 --------------------------------------------------------F---------------- ;-------------I---------------------------� -------------- 51 15.00 , Paving Pavers 1 i 7.00 130 : 0.42 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------;-------------F---------------------------* 1 HDT_Mix -------------- -------------------------------- Paving Rollers 1 i 7.00 80: 0.38 --------------------------------------------------------F---------------- ;-------------F---------------------------- ----- --------- Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1i 7.00 97: 0.37 -------------------------- ---------------- T------------4--------------�------------ 6.90: Architectural Coating ;Air Compressors 1 ; 6.00 , 78, 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class I Grading 4: 10.00: 0.00: 0.00. 14.70 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix �HDT_Mix jHHDT ----------------- ---------I- -- ---------- Building Construction 51 15.00 , 6.00 : 0.00. 14.70 6.90: 20.00 1 LD_Mix 1 HDT_Mix HHDT -------------------------------- --------- i ---------' ------------- ' Paving 71 18.00 , 0.00 : 0.00 , 14.70 6.90: 20.00 1 LD 1 HDT_Mix HHDT --------------+-----------------------------4----------+--------- -Mix ---------a--------------+---------T---------- ArchitecturalCoating 1 3.00, 0.00 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.001LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 1.2089 0.0000 1.2089 0.4630 0.0000 0.4630 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----------------------------------- -------- - ------- - ------T------ S----------------------------------------- Off -Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 1,159.657 1,159.657 0.2211 1,165.184 i i 0 ; 0 7 1 1 i , Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 1.2089 0.5371 1.7460 0.4630 0.5125 0.9755 1,159.657 1,159.657 0.2211 0.3567 1,165.184 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 0 0 7 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PNI10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i .� i i ________•n---------------------------- ------- ----------------------------T-------�------------ i --.-----�- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . i i _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . • n------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- - - - - - - -- _ _ _ '-------1------- ;-------'------- '-------T Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 - i 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e T 112.6833 003 004 004 ' ' ' 003 ' ' ' ' ' Total 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 112.6833 003 004 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Grading - 2019 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I I Category lb/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.4715 0.0000 0.4715 0.1806 0.0000 0.1806 + 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i i i i i i Off -Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 ? 0.0000 1,159.657 1,159.657 0.2211 1,165.184 0 0 7 i Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.4715 0.5371 1.0086 0.1806 0.5125 0.6931 0.0000 1,159.657 1,159.657 0.2211 0.0270 1,165.184 1.1300e- 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 0 0 7 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ? 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 ? 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 112.6833 003 004 004 i 003 i Total 0.0412 0.0270 0.3567 1.1300e- 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 112.6140 112.6140 2.7700e- 112.6833 003 004 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NB CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.9576 9.8207 7.5432 0.0114 0.6054 0.6054 0.5569 0.5569 ! 1,127.669 ' 1,127.669 ' 0.3568 1,136.589 • 6 6 2 1 1 ' ' Total 0.9576 9.8207 7.5432 0.0114 ' ' ------- 0.6054 0.6054 003 003 003 0.5569 0.5569 s ' 1,127.669 1,127.669 0.3568 0.7151 1,136.589 0.2060 5.7200e- 1 0.0555 5.4300e- 0.0609 332.7024 332.7024 0.0180 '[--' 333.1519 6 6 2 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust Ph110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 O.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ------------- I ------------------------------------T-------y --- ----------,--•--------------------------- V endor 0.0225 0.6809 ' 0.1800 1.5100e- ' 0.0383 4.6000e- ' O.C429 0.0110 4.4000e- ' 0.0154 i 163.7813 ' 163.7813 ' 0.0138 164.1270 003 003 003 ; -------- ----n-------'-------'-------1------- -------;-------------- ' ' ------- ;------- 1-------T-------y--_ Worker 0.0618 0.0405 0.5351 1.6900e- ' 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- ' 0.0455 i 168.9210 ' 168.9210 ' 4.1500e ? 169.0249 003 003 003 : 003 ' ' s ' Total 0.0843 0.7214 0.7151 3.2000e- 0.2060 5.7200e- 0.2117 0.0555 5.4300e- 0.0609 332.7024 332.7024 0.0180 '[--' 333.1519 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.9576 9.8207 7.5432 0.0114 0.6054 0.6054 0.5569 0.5569 ± 0.0000 1,127.669 1,127.669 0.3568 1,136.589 y 6 6 2 Total 0.9576 9.8207 7.5432 0.0114 t 0.6054 0.6054 003 003 003Y 0.5569 0.5569 0.0000 1,127.669 1,127.669 0.3568 0.7151 1,136.589 0.2060 5.7200e- 1 0.0555 5.4300e- 0.0609 332.7024 1 0.0180 333.1519 6 6 2 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0225 0.6809 0.1800 1.5100e- 0.0383 4.6000e- 0.0429 0.0110 4.4000e- 0.0154 163.7813 163.7813 0.0138 164.1270 003 ; 003 003 t t Worker 0.0618 0.0405 0.5351 1.6900e- 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 s 168.9210 168.9210 4.1500e- 169.0249 003 003 003Y 003 Total 0.0843 0.7214 0.7151 3.2000e- 0.2060 5.7200e- 0.2117 0.0555 5.4300e- 0.0609 332.7024 332.7024 0.0180 333.1519 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 ± 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 1,111.896 t 1 1 2 1 ' Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 003 003 003 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.4806 0.4806 0.0768 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 0.2060 1,111.896 0.2104 0.0555 4.1400e- 0.0596 326.1839 326.1839 0.0169 326.6060 11 1 1 003 2 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PNI10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -i Vendor 0.0192 0.6251 0.1650 1.4900e- 0.0383 3.2600e- O.G416 0.0110 3.1200e- 0.0142 162.6774 - 162.6774 1 0.0132 - 163.0063 003 003 003 y ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ T Worker 0.0576 0.0363 0.4910 1.6400e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 163.5065 - 163.5065 1 3.7300e ? 163.5997 003 003 003 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 Total 0.0768 0.6614 0.6560 3.1300e- 0.2060 4.3700e- 0.2104 0.0555 4.1400e- 0.0596 326.1839 326.1839 0.0169 326.6060 11 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 11 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 + 0.0000 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 1,111.896 --- --------------------------------------------------=-----------------------r----------------------;----------------------------- 2 ' 003 003 ' 003 ; ' Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 3.1300e- 0.5224 0.5224 0.2104 0.4806 0.4806 0.0000 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 1,111.896 11 003 003 003 1 1 2 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 11 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 --- --------------------------------------------------=-----------------------r----------------------;----------------------------- Vendor 0.0192 0.6251 0.1650 1.4900e- 0.0383 3.2600e- 0.0416 0.0110 3.1200e- T 0.0142 } 162.6774 162.6774 0.0132 163.0063 ' 003 003 ' 003 ; ---------------------------------------------------------- ____ _______ ______ _ Worker --0-.0576 0.0363 0.4910 1.6400e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 p 163.5065 163.5065 3.7300e- T 163.5997 003 003 003 i 003 ' ' ' ' Total 0.0768 0.6614 0.6560 3.1300e- 0.2060 4.3700e- 0.2104 0.0555 4.1400e- 0.0596 326.1839 326.1839 0.0169 326.6060 11 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.7716 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 0.3950 0.3950 0.3669 0.3669 s 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 1,042.932 6 6 3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 t : ' ' 1 Total 0.7716 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 1.9700e- 0.3950 0.3950 0.2025 0.3669 0.3669 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 4.4700e- 1,042.932 196.3197 003 003 003 6 6 003 3 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------T---------- - Worker 0.0692 0.0436 0.5892 1.9700e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 } 196.2079 196.2079 4.4700e T 196.3197 003 003 003 i 003 : Total 0.0692 0.0436 0.5892 1.9700e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 196.2079 196.2079 4.4700e- 196.3197 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Paving - 2020 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.7716 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 0.3950 0.3950 0.3669 0.3669 i 0.0000 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 1,042.932 6 6 ; 3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 - 0.0000 s ' Total 0.7716 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 i 0.3950 0.3950 003 003 003 0.3669 0.3669 0.0000 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 0.0436 1,042.932 1.9700e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 196.2079 196.2079 4.4700e- 6 6 3 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ., , , , , , , , , , i , , , , , -------------------------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ---------------- V endor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ....-------,-------------- --------------- s 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ., , , , , , , , , , i Worker 0.0692 0.0436 0.5892 1.9700e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 196.2079 196.2079 4.4700e- 196.3197 003 003 003 i 003 1 1 i ' ' ' Total 0.0692 0.0436 0.5892 1.9700e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 196.2079 196.2079 4.4700e- 196.3197 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- H4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total IL777 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 3.0146 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i i , --------------- -------- r_______y _______ _______T _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Off -Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0-1-1-0-9-7-0-1109 0.1109 0.1109 ± 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.2568 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- Worker 0.0115 7.2600e- 0.0982 3.3000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- O.C338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- 0.1109 0.1109 004 ' 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 0.0335 281.9928 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- 003 32.7013 32.7013 7.50OOe- 32.7199 003 004 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PNI10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total IL77O2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 is 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 --------------- i Worker 0.0115 7.2600e- 0.0982 3.3000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- O.C338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- t 32.7013 :32.7013 7.SOOOe- 32.7199 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 ' Total 0.0115 7.2600e- 0.0982 3.3000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- 32.7013 32.7013 7.50OOe- 32.7199 003 004 004 003 004 003 1 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 3.0146 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _ Off -Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 + 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 003 s Total 3.2568 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 3 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 1 281.9928 0.0115 7.2600e- 0.0982 3.3000e- 003 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- 32.7013 32.7013 7.5000e- 32.7199 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i s Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s i 3 Worker 0.0115 7.2600e- 0.0982 3.3000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- i 32.7013 32.7013 7.5000e- 32.7199 003 004 004 003 004 003 s 004 1 Total 0.0115 7.2600e- 0.0982 3.3000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- 32.7013 32.7013 7.5000e- 32.7199 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Office Building 5.97 1.33 0.57 14,605 8,850 ....................................: --------------F----- --- ------ Y Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 Total 5.97 1.33 0.57 14,605 8,850 4.3 Trip Type Information ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 I NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N2O CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated 8.3800e- 0.0303 0.0891 3.00OOe- 0.0247 3.00OOe- 0.0250 6.6100e- 2.8000e- 6.8800e- + 30.0121 :30.0121 1.3400e- 30.0456 003 004 004 003 004 003 s 003 Unmitigated 9.9700e- 0.0404 0.1326 4.8000e- 0.0408 4.7000e- 0.0412 0.0109 4.4000e- 0.0113 48.2720 48.2720 2.0200e- 7 -4-8-.3-22-5- 003 004 004 004 003 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Office Building 5.97 1.33 0.57 14,605 8,850 ....................................: --------------F----- --- ------ Y Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 Total 5.97 1.33 0.57 14,605 8,850 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary 77 Diverted Pass -by General Office Building • 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 Y 19 4 ..... Non -Asphalt Sues Other•rfac -- 16.60 8.40 -- -------- -------- 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 -------- -------------------- 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH General Office Building 0.555968• 0.0438481 0.2103591 0.116378: 0.0167651 0.0057951 0.0250081 0.0161601 0.0016771 0.0015861 0.0048671 0.0005861 0.001002 ------ ------ ------------' Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.555968• 0.043848 , 0.210359 - 0.116378 , 0.016765 , 0.005795 , 0.025008 - 0.016160 , 0.001677 , 0.001586 - 0.004867 - 0.000586 , 0.001002 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 Mitigated 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 ; 004 i 005 005 NaturalGas 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 Unmitigated 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NE3io- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I I PM10 PNI10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office 13.6065 + 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- + 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 Building +; 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 005 005 +. Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 +; Asphalt Surfaces ; ' ' ' ' 1 t ' ' Total 1.5000e- 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.00DOe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 004 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 71.6008 004 005 005 005 Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NE3io- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SUse PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office -0.0136065,6- 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 Building ; 004 003 ; 003 005 004 ; 004 004 004 t 005 005 r------ *,----------------------------------- n -------n------- ------- I -------r-------* ------- ,------- ------------------------------ Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces , 1 ' ' ' 1 ' ' Total 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.00DOe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 1 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day PM10 Mitigated 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- + 8.0300e- 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 005 003 005 ; 005 ; 005 005 i 003 003 005 ; 003 ----------------------------------- -------r-------I-------r------T------T------T------- + Unmitigated 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- r 8.0300e -T 8.0300e -T 2.000Oe-T ______ _ T 8 5700e- Architectural 4.1300e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 4.1300e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 003 A, i, Consumer 0.0235 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ? 0.0000 0.0000 Products ; Landscaping 3.5000e- 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- + 8.0300e- 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003 + Total 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.03OOe- 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Loacl Factor Fuel Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 4.130Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 Coating •' 003 Consumer 0.0235 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products ., Landscaping 3.5000e- 3.00OOe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 8.03OOe- 8.0300e- 2.00OOe- 8.57OOe- 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 s 003 003 005 003 ' ' ' ' Total 0.0280 3.00OOe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 8.0300e- tt.0300e- 2.00OOe- 8.5700e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Loacl Factor Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:52 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Summer 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumros and Emerciencv Generators IEquipment Type Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 22 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 Orange County, Winter Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 0.54 1000sgft 0.01 541.00 i 0 -------------- ----------------- ------------------------ Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 36.15 1000sgft 0.83 36,152.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 (Ib/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Precipitation Freq (Days) Operational Year N20 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) 30 2020 0.006 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter Project Characteristics - . Land Use - Phase 2- new 9,281 sf NCC building by renovation/expansion of existing 8,740 sf library = 541 sf newly construced portion of building, 28,553 sf walkways/plazas, & 7,599 sf landscaping/OS. Construction Phase - Construction to start February 2019 and end February 2020. Demolition - Grading - In land use section Phase 1 estimated as —0.86 acres. Per developer, cut 156 cubic feet - fill 80 cubic feet = 76 cubic feet cut. 76 cubic feet = 2.81 cubic yards cut. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Lions Park is located in downtown City of Costa Mesa. OCTA Route 43 stop Park -19th located across Park Avenue (-53 feet or 0.01 miles from site). Water Mitigation - Per California Green Building Standards. Waste Mitigation - AB 939 requires each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 40 15 1i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - . . - . . . . . - - - - - Y.----------------------------- I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 0.86 1i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - .. . ------------------------------- I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . tblGrading Materia lExported 0.00 i 2.81 ------ -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- tblProjectCharacteristics Operationaffear 2018 2020 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total Year Ib/day Ib/day 2019 1.0508 10.5469 8.2362 0.0145 1.3207 0.6112 1.8585 0.4927 0.5625 1.0058 } 0.0000 1,447.348 1,447.348 0.3753 0.0000 1,456.730 i 8 8 7 ---- -------------------------- ------------------------------------------- --------- - 2020 3.2698 9.5171 8.0221 0.0144 0.2060 0.5268 0.7328 0.0555 0.4848 T 0.5403 } 0.0000 1,416.400 - 1 416.400 0.3741 - 0.0000 ? 1,425.752 9 9 8 t i 1 Maximum 3.2698 10.5469 8.2362 0.0145 1.3207 0.6112 1.8585 0.4927 0.5625 1.0058 0.0000 1,447.348 1,447.348 0.3753 0.0000 1,456.730 11 8 8 7 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year Ib/day Ib/day 2019 1.0508 10.5469 8.2362 0.0145 0.5833 0.6112 1.-211 0.2102 0.5625 0.7234 + 0.0000 1,447.348 1,447.348 0.3753 0.0000 1,456.730 t 8 8 7 -------------------------------------------------------------- 2020 3.2698 9.5171 8.0221 0.0144 0.2060 0.5268 0.7328 0.0555 0.4848 0.5403 0.0000 1,416.400 1,416.400 0.3741 0.0000 1,425.752 9 9 8 1 1 1 1 ' ' ' ' Maximum 3.2698 10.5469 8.2362 0.0145 0.5833 0.6112 1.1211 0.2102 0.5625 0.7234 0.0000 1,447.348 1,447.348 0.3753 0.0000 1,456.730 11 8 8 7 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.30 0.00 28.46 51.53 0.00 18.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.0300e- 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 005 003 ; 005 ; 005 005 005 003 ; 003 005 003 005 003 005 005 005 005 Energy 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 - 1.6008 3.000Oe- - 3.000Oe- 1.6103 004 ; 003 ; 003 005 004 004 ; 004 ; 004 005 005 i Mobile 9.8200e- 0.0416 0.1270 - 4.5000e- - 0.0408 - 4.7000e- - 0.0412 - 0.0109 - 4.4000e- - 0.0113 46.1129 46.1129 2.0100e- - 46.1632 003 004 ; ; 004 004 003 ; i Total 0.0380 0.0430 0.1319 4.6000e- 0.0408 5.8000e- 0.0414 0.0109 5.5000e- 0.0115 47.7217 47.7217 2.0600e- 3.000Oe- 47.7821 0.0921 2.9000e- 0.0247 4.1000e- 004 6.6100e- 004 7.000Oe- 004 30.2605 1.4000e- 3.000Oe- 003 005 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.0300e- 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 i Energy 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- + 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 : 005 005 s Mobile 8.2600e- 0.0310 0.0872 2.8000e- 0.0247 3.000Oe- 0.0250 6.6100e- 2.8000e- 6.8900e- i 28.6517 28.6517 1.3500e- 28.6855 003 004 004 003 004 003 : 003 : Total 0.0364 0.0323 0.0921 2.9000e- 0.0247 4.1000e- 0.0251 6.6100e- 3.9000e- 7.000Oe- 30.2605 30.2605 1.4000e- 3.000Oe- 30.3043 004 004 003 004 003 003 005 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-032 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 2 :Building Construction :Building Construction 2/7/2019 :1/31/2020 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 3 • Paving • Paving 2/1/2020 :2/14/2020 5: 5 Percent 4.11 24.78 30.18 36.96 39.39 29.31 39.27 39.36 29.09 38.86 0.00 36.59 36.59 32.04 0.00 36.58 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Grading -Grading 12/1/2019 '2/6/2019 ' 5' 2' ------------------------------------------------I------------;------------4---------4--------T------------------------- 2 :Building Construction :Building Construction 2/7/2019 :1/31/2020 5: 100: --------------------------------------------------------I------------4------------4--------4---------------------------------- 3 • Paving • Paving 2/1/2020 :2/14/2020 5: 5 --------------------------------; ----------------------- ------------r----------- I -------- I------------------------------------ 4 :Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 2/15/2020 2/28/2020 5: 5: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.86 Acres of Paving: 0.83 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 812; Non -Residential Outdoor: 271; Striped Parking Area: 2,169 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Grading •Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 1 -------------------------------------------------------I- ----------------- Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers 1 ---------------------------C---------------------------F----------------- - - - - - - - - - Grading •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 --------------------------- C ---------------------------F----------------- - - - - - - - - - Building Construction •Cranes 1 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------- Number Building Construction •Forklifts 2 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------- - - - - - - - - - Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- Paving •Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- Paving • Pavers 1 -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- Paving •Rollers 1 ' --------------- Paving -Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 --------- ------ ------- - -- ------ >rchitectural Coating ;Air Compressors Trips and VMT 8.00. 81 ' 0.73 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F-----------1111------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.00 , 247: 0.40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - t---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.00 , 97' 0.37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - f----------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4.00 , 231: 0.29 ------------- Number 6.00- 89: 0.20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F--------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8.00 - 97: 0.37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ir --------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.00: 9 0.56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F--------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7.00 - 130: 0.42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F ---------------------------r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7.00- 80' 0.38 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F----------------------1111- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7.00 - 97: 0.37 -------------L-------------'--------------- 1HDT_Mix 6.00, 78 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class I Grading 4 10.00: � 0.00: 0.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.00-LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix :HHDT ---------------7--------------- ---------I---- ;----------:-----------� ---------4---------- ------------- ------------ Building Construction 5F 15.00: 6.00: 0.00, 14.70f 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT -------------------------------- F----------�- ' ---------I- - --111111 11---1111--f----------�- ' --------- ---------------------- -- ---------- Paving 71 18.00, 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.001LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix :HHDT ---------T---------r----------+------------------+-------------+-------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------+----------�— Architectural Coating 1; 3.00 0.00; 0.00; 14.70; 6.90; 20.00:1-D Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C7 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 1.2089 1 0.0000 1.2089 0.4630 0.0000 0.4630 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 . . . . . . . . . . .�I-------'----------------- - - - - - - -------- -------y . . . . . . •1------- -••----- --- ----1-------T....... ;-------'-------1-------1------- Off -Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 1,159.657 1,159.657 0.2211 1 1,165.184 1 i 0 ' 0 ; 7 1 1 1 Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 1.2089 0.5371 1.7460 0.4630 0.5125 0.9755 1,159.657 1,159.657 0.2211 1,165.184 003 004 004 0 0 003 7 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PN110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C0717777=1 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 } 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ----------------------------------------------------------i-----------------------------i'-- ' T -------------•------------------- ----- - Vendor 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . . . . . . . . . .---------'------- ;------- ;-------1-------'------- ------- ------- 1-------T-------- . . . _ _ _ __ 1 1 Worker •1 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 1 0.1118 7.5000e- 1 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 1 0.0303 a 106.5774 1 106.5774 1 2.6300e T 106.6430 003 004 004 003 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 Total 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 106.6430 003 004 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Grading - 2019 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.4715 0.0000 0.4715 0.1806 0.0000 0.1806 ! 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.5371 0.5371 0.5125 0.5125 ± 0.0000 1,159.657 1,159.657 0.2211 1,165.184 0 0 7 i Total 0.9530 8.6039 7.6917 0.0120 0.4715 0.5371 1.0086 0.1806 0.5125 0.6931 0.0000 1,159.657 1,159.657 0.2211 0.0465 1,165.184 11 1.0700e- 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 0 0 106.6430 7 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Worker 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 106.6430 003 004 004 A 003 Total 0.0465 0.0297 0.3303 1.0700e- 0.1118 7.5000e- 0.1125 0.0296 6.9000e- 0.0303 106.5774 106.5774 2.6300e- 106.6430 003 004 004 1 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.9576 9.8207 7.5432 0.0114 0.6054 0.6054 0.5569 0.5569 ! 1,127.669 1,127.669 0.3568 1,136.589 i 6 6 2 i i ' 1 1 1 0.0235 0.6816 0.1976 1.4700e- 0.0383 4.6900e- O.C430 0.0110 4.4800e- 0.0155 0.9576 9.8207 7.5432 0.0114 1 0.6054 0.6054 003 003 003 0.5569 0.5569 a 1 1 1 1,127.669 1,127.669 0.3568 0.6930 1,136.589 :t.�111 5.8100e- 0.2118 0.0555 5.5100e- 0.0610 319.6791 319.6791 0.0185 320.1415 6 6 2 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PR110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .� i i i i ------'----�----------------------- ------ --------------�-------�------- T-------+ i ------- ---------•-------------------------- 0.0235 0.6816 0.1976 1.4700e- 0.0383 4.6900e- O.C430 0.0110 4.4800e- 0.0155 - 159.8131 159.8131 0.0146 160.1770 003 ' 003 ; ; 003 + ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------T-------i-- 1 Worker0.0697 0.0446 0.4954 1.6000e- 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455 1-------4- 159.8661 - 159.8661 3.9400e- - T 159.9645 003 003 003 i 003 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 Total 0.0932 0.7262 0.6930 3.0700e- 0.2060 5.8100e- 0.2118 0.0555 5.5100e- 0.0610 319.6791 319.6791 0.0185 320.1415 11 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 N137 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 71 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.9576 9.8207 7.5432 0.0114 0.6054 0.6054 0.5569 0.5569 i 0.0000 1,127.669 1,127.669 0.3568 1,136.589 : 6 6 2 : Total 0.9576 9.8207 7.5432 0.0114 0.6054 0.6054 003 003 003 0.5569 0.5569 0.0000 1,127.669 1,127.669 0.3568 0.2060 1,136.589 0.2118 0.0555 5.5100e- 0.0610 319.6791 319.6791 0.0185 320.1415 6 6 003 2 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Vendor 0.0235 0.6816 0.1976 1.4700e- 0.0383 4.6900e- 0.0430 0.0110 4.4800e- 0.0155 } 159.8131 159.8131 0.0146 160.1770 003 ; 003 003 Worker 0.0697 0.0446 0.4954 1.6000e- 0.1677 1.1200e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0300e- 0.0455i 159.8661 159.8661 3.9400e- 159.9645 003 003 003 : 003 Total 0.0932 0.7262 0.6930 3.0700e- 0.2060 5.8100e- 0.2118 0.0555 5.5100e- 0.0610 319.6791 319.6791 0.0185 320.1415 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 ! 1,102.978 1 1,102.978 1 0.3567 1,111.896 1 1 2 1 11,102.978 Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 i 159.0252 0.5224 0.5224 -------------------------------------------;--------------;-------------- -------�--- Worker 0.0651 0.0399 0.4538 1.5500e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 0.4806 0.4806 003 1 1 1 1,102.978 0.3567 0.6648 1,111.896 3.0100e- 0.2060 4.4300e- 0.2104 0.0555 4.1900e- 0.0597 313.4228 313.4228 0.0174 1 1 2 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PKI Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AA---- •---.----------------------------------------- V----------------------------T---------------,------- endor 0.0200 0.6249 0.1808 1.4600e- 0.0383 3.3200e- O.C417 0.0110 3.1700e- 0.0142 --•-----�-------�--- 158.6796 158.6796 0.0138 ? i 159.0252 003 003 003 ; ., -------------------------------------------;--------------;-------------- -------�--- Worker 0.0651 0.0399 0.4538 1.5500e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 - + 154.7432 154.7432 3.5300e- T 154.8314 003 003 003 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 Total 0.0852 0.6648 0.6346 3.0100e- 0.2060 4.4300e- 0.2104 0.0555 4.1900e- 0.0597 313.4228 313.4228 0.0174 313.8566 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 0.4806 0.4806 + 0.0000 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 1,111.896 i 1 1 2 s Total 0.8617 8.8523 7.3875 0.0114 0.5224 0.5224 Worker 0.0651 0.0399 0.4538 1.5500e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 0.4806 0.4806 0.0000 1,102.978 1,102.978 0.3567 0.0852 1,111.896 0.6346 3.0100e- 0.2060 4.4300e- 0.2104 0.0555 4.1900e- 0.0597 1 313.4228 313.4228 0.0174 1 1 2 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s s -------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------T ------- y . . . . . ..,----------------------------------------- . . Vendor 0.0200 0.6249 0.1808 1.4600e- 0.0383 3.3200e- 0.0417 0.0110 3.1700e- 0.0142 158.6796 158.6796 0.0138 159.0252 003 ; ; 003 ; 003 s Worker 0.0651 0.0399 0.4538 1.5500e- 0.1677 1.1100e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0200e- 0.0455 + 154.7432 154.7432 3.5300e- 154.8314 003 003 003 s 003 s Total 0.0852 0.6648 0.6346 3.0100e- 0.2060 4.4300e- 0.2104 0.0555 4.1900e- 0.0597 313.4228 313.4228 0.0174 313.8566 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.7716 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 0.3950 0.3950 0.3669 0.3669 ! 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 1,042.932 6 6 3 ., Paving 0.0000 0.0000 O.C'000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' ' 1 Total 0.7716 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 i 0.3950 0.3950 Worker 0.0782 0.0479 0.5446 1.8600e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 0.3669 0.3669 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 11 1,042.932 0.0479 0.5446 1 1 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 185.6918 6 6 185.7977 3 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 --------------- ----------------------------------------------------------T------------- ------- ------- ----------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i -------------------------- - - - - - - --------------- - - - - - - --------------- -------T-------+--- Worker 0.0782 0.0479 0.5446 1.8600e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 _ 185.6918 185.6918 4.2400e ? 185.7977 003 003 003 003 1 1 i ' ' Total 0.0782 0.0479 0.5446 1.8600e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 185.6918 185.6918 4.2400e- 185.7977 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Paving - 2020 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total INBio-CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.7716 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 0.3950 0.3950 0.3669 0.3669 + 0.0000 1,035.392 1,035.392 0.3016 1,042.932 s 6 6 3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11,035.392 Total 0.7716 7.2266 7.1128 0.0113 s 0.3950 0.3950 0.0782 0.0479 0.5446 1.8600e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 0.3669 0.3669 0.0000 1,035.392 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.3016 Total 1,042.932 0.0479 0.5446 1.8600e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 185.6918 6 6 185.7977 3 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total INBio-CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A ------------------------------------------------------------------T------ s ____�_______ ------ ------� -- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s ------ ___---------------- --i------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------T--- Worker i ___.__i------- ------t_______ 0.0782 0.0479 0.5446 1.8600e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 + 185.6918 185.6918 4.2400e- 185.7977 ' 003 003 003 003 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 Total 0.0782 0.0479 0.5446 1.8600e- 0.2012 1.3300e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2300e- 0.0546 185.6918 185.6918 4.2400e- 185.7977 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 3.0146 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 � r i Off -Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 003i ; ----------•------------------------------------�-------------- Worker 0.0130 7.9800e- 0.0908 3.1000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- } 30.9486 :30.9486 7.1000e- 30.9663 Total 3.2568 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.0908 0.1109 0.1109 2.2000e- 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 :30.9486 281.9928 30.9663 003 004 004 003 004 003 1 004 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AA0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----------•------------------------------------�-------------- Worker 0.0130 7.9800e- 0.0908 3.1000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- } 30.9486 :30.9486 7.1000e- 30.9663 003 004 004 003 004 003 S 004 1 1 Total 0.0130 7.9800e- 0.0908 3.1000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- 30.9486 :30.9486 7.100Oe- 30.9663 003 004 004 003 004 003 1 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction On -Site Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 11 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •' 3.0146 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 .. Off -Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- ' 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 ' 0.1109 s 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 003 ; i t � t 1 Total 3.2568 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 004 004 003 004 003 0.1109 0.1109 i 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 0.0335 281.9928 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- 003 30.9486 30.9486 7.1000e- 30.9663 003 004 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total 1 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _---------..--------------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i-------'--------------- + ' Worker 0.0130 7.9800e- ' 0.0908 3.1000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- ' 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- 30.9486 30.9486 7.1000e- 30.9663 003 004 004 003 004 003 : : 004 i Total 0.0130 7.9800e- 0.0908 3.1000e- 0.0335 2.2000e- 0.0338 8.8900e- 2.00OOe- 9.1000e- 30.9486 30.9486 7.1000e- 30.9663 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Office Building 5.97 1.33 f 0.57 14,605 8,850 ..................................................... F----------- ----------------------- Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 t 0.00 Total 5.97 1.33 1 0.57 14,605 8,850 4.3 Trip Type Information ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated 8.2600e- 0.0310 0.0872 2.8000e- 0.0247 3.0OOOe- 0.0250 6.6100e- 2.800Oe- 6.8900e- ± 28.6517 28.6517 1.3500e- 28.6855 003 004 ; 004 I 003 004 003 ; 003 M-------r------T------T-------r------- -------r------ Unmitigated 9.8200e- 0.0416 0.1270 4.5000e- - 0.0408 4.7000e- 0.0412 0.0109 4.4000e- 0.0113 46.1129 46.1129 2.0100e- 46.1632 003 004 004 004 003 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Office Building 5.97 1.33 f 0.57 14,605 8,850 ..................................................... F----------- ----------------------- Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 t 0.00 Total 5.97 1.33 1 0.57 14,605 8,850 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 i 19.00 77 Y 19 4 ... Other•Non-Asphalt Surfaces •� -------- 16.60 8.40 -------- --------I ----- -------- -------- --------- 6.90 O.00 0.00 0.00 0 ------------------------ 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH General Office Building 0.555968• 0.043848 i 0.210359 i 0.116378 i 0.016765 e 0.005795 i 0.025008 i 0.016160 i 0.001677 i 0.001586 i 0.004867 i 0.0005861 0.00100 Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.555968 • 0.043848 , 0.210359 , 0.116378 , 0.016765 00579 : .05 , 0.025008 , 0.016160 , 0.001677- 0.001586- 0.004867- 0.000586 , 0.00100, 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- } 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 Mitigated 004 003 003 005 .. 004 004 004 ; 004 AA 005 005 NaturalGas 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 Unmitigated 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NE3io- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 Ph110 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office 13.6065 + 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 , Building :, 004 003 003 005 ; 004 004 004 004005 005 : A. „ _ Other Non- 0 6: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 x0000 T i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; :, ' ' ' ' 1 ' ' Total 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe-70,0 0Oe- 1.6103 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 0055 005 Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NE3io- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office -0.0136065+- 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- + 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 Building 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 003 ; ; 005 005 ; --+ T Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ' ' 1 ' 1 ' ' Total 1.5000e- 1.3300e- 1.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.6008 1.6008 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 1.6103 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx I CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day PM10 Mitigated 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- ! 8.0300e- - 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 005 003 005 ; 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 Unmitigated 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.0300e- 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- i 0.0000 0.0000 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive J Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 4.1300e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 003 s s ; Consumer 0.0235 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 3.5000e- 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 8.0300e- 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 Total 0.0280 3.000Oe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.0000e. 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 8.0300e- 8.0300e- 2.000Oe- 8.5700e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 22 Date: 1/30/2017 3:53 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 4.1300e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 003 Consumer 0.0235 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Products ------------------------------------------------------------------------------T------- Landscaping 3.5000e- 3.00OOe- 3.770Oe- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- -------------- -------- ------- ---- 8.0300e- 8.0300e- 2.00OOe- 8.5700e- 004 ; 005 003 ; 005 C05 005 005 1 ' ' Z 003 003 005 003 ' 1 ' Total 0.0280 3.00OOe- 3.7700e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 8.0300e- Et.0300e- 2.00OOe- 8.5700e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type UOI}e4860A 0• � L jagwnN adAi luewdmb3 ;uaua in 3 pauijaa aasn ads _L jan3 buileb Jape jeaMndul leaH Aea/lndul leaH jagwnN ad/,1 luewdinb3 saa�io8 adAi jan3 Joloe3 peol Jannod asaoH aea,,/smoH Aea/sjnoH jagwnN adAi luawdinb3 sao;eaauaE) AOUObJBW3 pue s nand aal=l juawdinb3 tieuoi}e;S 0'0L aajulM `AlunoO a6ueJ0 - Z aseud - Jed suoll 6X89 Nd ES:E LWZ/0M :ale(] ZZdo ZZ abed VC'9WZ'P0N331eO :uolsJan PON33leO m m O Q 0 C. m Dv m D v � � 3 m — � Z � o — � 0 0 M 0' 0 c CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Library 11.58 1000sgft 0.27 22,860.00 i 0 .------------------------------_------------------------------, Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 141.09 ------------------------------- I--------------- ?------------------i--------------- 1000sgft 3.24 141,087.00 0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------- -------------- ------------------- Lot 14.31 1000sgft 0.33 14,307.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Climate Zone 8 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 (Ib/MWhr) Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Operational Year 2019 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual Project Characteristics - . Land Use - Phase 1- 22,860 sf library (11,584 sf building footprint), 79,137 sf of walkways & plazas, 61,950 sf of landscaping & open space, and a 14,307 sf parking lot. Construction Phase - Construction to start July 2017 and end December 2018. Demolition - Existing —22,750 sf Neighborhood Community Center to be demolished. Grading - Per developer, fill 3,997 cubic feet - cut 994 cubic feet = 3,033 cubic feet fill. 3,033 cubic feet = 111.2 cubic yards fill. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Lions Park is located in the downtown portion of the City of Costa Mesa. OCTA Route 43 stop Park -19th is across Park Avenue (-53 feet or —0.01 miles from project site). Water Mitigation - Per Green Building Standards. Waste Mitigation - AB 939 requires each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed 40 i 15 ---------------------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------------------------------------- ---------------- Yr NumDa s 18.00 i -------------------------- 10.00 ----------------------------_----------------y tblCon structionPhase ------------------------------------------ NumDa s 230.00 i -------------------------- 325.00 ------------------------------ _---------------- tblConstructionPhase Y ----------- r----------------------------- NumDa s 8.00 1 -------------------------- 25.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tblConstructionPhase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T----------------- NumDa s 18.00 1 10.00 ----------------------------- Y------------------------------ tblGrading -----------------------------i-------------------------- AcresOfGrading 12.50 1 4.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . Y tblGrading . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Material Imported Y ----------------- ------------t 0.00 1 ................. ......... 111.20 ----------------------------- _----------9------ tblLandUse ----------- r -----------------------------f-------------------------- Buildin S acesq uareFeet 11,580.00 1 22,860.00 ----------------------------- Y tblLandUse --------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------- Buildin S aces uareFeet 141,090.00 1 141,087.00 -----------------------------+----------9------ tblLandUse -------------------------------------------t-------------------------- Buildin S acesq uareFeet 14,310.00 1 14,307.00 ------------------------------ tblLandUse -----------------------------T-----------------------------f-------------------------- LandUseSquareFeet 11,580.00 1 22,860.00 ----------------------------- _---------------------------- tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet T -----------------------------f-------------------------- 141,090.00 1 141,087.00 ----------------------------- _---------------q------------- tblLandUse r -----------------------------f-------------------------- Land UseS uareFeet 14,310.00 14,307.00 ----------------------------- tbIProjectCharacteristics ---------------- ------------------------------ OperationalYear 2018 -------------------------- 2019 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM 10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio7otal I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 0.2359 2.1743 1.4150 2.6700e- 0.1361 0.1219 0.2580 0.0561 0.1139 0.1700 1 0.0000 244.0078 244.0078 0.0499 0.0000 245.2549 003 2018 0.5142 3.3447 2.6405 5.2300e- 0.1226 0.1887 0.3113 0.0331 0.1774 0.2105 } 0.0000 473.3328 473.3328 0.0828 0.0000 475.4017 003 ' Maximum 0.5142 3.3447 2.6405 5.2300e- 0.1361 0.1887 0.3113 0.0561 0.1774 0.2105 0.0000 473.3328 473.3328 0.0828 0.0000 475.4017 0.0000 475.4013 003 003 1 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio7otal I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 0.2359 2.1743 1.4149 2.6700e- 0.0820 0.1219 0.2039 0.0297 0.1139 0.1436 0.0000 244.0076 244.0076 0.0499 0.0000 245.2547 003 ; ; i ' : -------------------;-------- - - - - - - -------;-------;--------------1--------------T-------*------- ------------------- 2018 0.5142 3.3446 2.6405 5.2300e- 0.1226 0.1887 0.3113 0.0331 0.1774 0.2105 0.0000 ? i 473.3324 473.3324 0.0828 0.0000 475.4013 003 + 1 A ' Maximum 0.5142 3.3446 2.6405 5.2300e- 0.1226 0.1887 0.3113 0.0331 0.1774 0.2105 0.0000 473.3324 473.3324 0.0828 0.0000 475.4013 003 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual Quarter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 3-31-2018 0.9735 0.9735 4 4-1-2018 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.9926 0.9926 Highest 1.3073 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.89 0.00 9.49 29.62 0.00 6.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 1 s ' ' 1 Total 0.2764 0.7284 2.0829 6.8200e- 0.5595 9.5000e- 0.5690 0.1498 9.0400e- 0.1589 2.2788 710.1427 712.4215 0.1715 1.3500e- Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 7-1-2017 9-30-2017 1.3073 1.3073 2 10-1-2017 12-31-2017 1.1242 1.1242 3 1-1-2018 3-31-2018 0.9735 0.9735 4 4-1-2018 6-30-2018 0.9818 0.9818 5 7-1-2018 9-30-2018 0.9926 0.9926 Highest 1.3073 1.3073 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 11 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.1056 2.000Oe- 2.1500e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 4.1400e- 4.1400e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.4200e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 Energy 2.5800e- 0.0235 0.0197 1.4000e- 1.79OOe- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 0.0000 92.3781 92.3781 3.2500e- 1.0400e- 92.7691 s 003 ; 004 ; 003 003 ; 003 ; 003 003 003 Mobile 0.1682 0.7049 2.0610 6.6800e- 0.5595 7.7000e- 0.5672 0.1498 7.2400e- 0.1571 + 0.0000 614.2511 614.2511 0.0284 0.0000 614.9613 003 ; 003 003 i ------- ------- ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------r-------*----- ----------•----------- Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 2.1639 0.0000 2.1639 0.1279 0.0000 5.3609 : Water T 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.1150 3.5093 3.6243 0.0120 3.1000e 4.0151 s 004 1 s ' ' 1 Total 0.2764 0.7284 2.0829 6.8200e- 0.5595 9.5000e- 0.5690 0.1498 9.0400e- 0.1589 2.2788 710.1427 712.4215 0.1715 1.3500e- 717.1108 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.1056 2.000Oe- 2.1500.- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- ± 0.0000 4.1400e- 4.1400e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.4200e- 005 ; 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 Energy 2.5800e- 0.0235 0.0197 1.4000e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- ± 0.0000 92.3781 92.3781 3.2500e- 1.0400e- 92.7691 003 ; ; 004 ; ; 003 003 003 003 i 003 003 . . . . . . . . .. . - - - - - - -* . . . . . .----------------- fl-------,-------,-------1-------,-------1-----------------------,-------T ,------- .. . . . . . Mobile 0.1436 0.5274 1.4250 - 4.1000e- 0.3322 - 4.8500e- - 0.3371 - 0.0890 - 4.5600e- 0.0935 0.0000 377.0624 377.0624 0.0191 0.0000 ? 377.5404 003 003 003 ------.....---------------- Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1.0819 0.0000 1.0819 0.0639 0.0000 2.6805 48.49 33.44 i i i i i i i Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0920 3.2087 3.3006 - 9.5800e- 2.5000e- 3.6147 i 003 004 i Total 0.2518 0.5509 1.4469 4.2400e- 0.3322 6.6500e- 0.3389 0.0890 6.3600e- 0.0953 1.1739 472.6533 473.8272 0.0959 1.2900e- 476.6091 003 003 003 003 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 8.93 24.37 30.53 37.83 40.62 30.00 40.44 40.61 29.65 39.99 48.49 33.44 33.49 44.08 4.44 33.54 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 -Demolition -Demolition 7/1/2017 :7/28/2017 5 20: ------------------------------------------------------- I ------------ ; ------------ ----------------T 2 -Grading :Grading 7/29/2017 ;9/1/2017 5: 25: --------------------------------------------------------I------------4------------4--------4--------T------------------------- 3 -Building Construction :Building Construction 9/2/2017 :11/30/2018 5: 325; :------------------------------------------------I------------4------------4--------4--------T------------------------- 4 -Paving -Paving :12/1/2018 ' 12/14/2018 i ' 5' i 10' -------%-------------------------- ------------------------ 1. -------------'r------------'r--------I--------- ------------------------- 5 :Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating :12/15/2018 12/28/2018 5. 10. Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 3.57 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 34,290; Non -Residential Outdoor: 11,430; Striped Parking Area: 9,324 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual IPhase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Demolition •Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 I 8.00; 81 - 0.73 ----------------------------:---------------------------F----------------' Demolition •Excavators F..... ------ 8.00:158; 0.38 -------------------------------------------------------- Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers F ----------------; -------------F--------------------------- 2 8.00 : 247: 0.40 ----------------------------:--------------------------- F ----------------; -------------F--------------------------- Grading Excavators 1� 8.00: 158: 0.38 ----------------------------:---------------------------F---------------- ;-------------F---------------------------- Grading -Graders 1 � 8.00- 187: 0.41 :-------------------------------------------1--- -------I --------. - Gradin •Rubber Tired Dozers 9 � 1 � 8.00 247; 0.40 -------------------------------------------------------- F ----------------- I --- - ---------F--------------------------- Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 31 8.00, 97: 0.37 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------;-------------F--------------------------- r-------------- Building Construction Cranes 1 I 7.00 231: 0.29 -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------F---------------------------- -------------- Building Construction Forklifts g 3 8.00, 89: 0.20 ---------------------------F----------------;--- - ---------F---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Building Construction Generator Sets 11 8.00- 84: 0.74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------------- F ----------------;-------------F--------------------------- -------------- Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes g 3 7.00 97: 0.37 ----------------------------?---------------------------F----------------;-------------F---------------------------- -------------- Building Construction Welders 1 i 8.00:46 : 0.45 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- F ----------------' ---------------------------r, Paving :Cement and Mortar Mixers 2i 6.00- 9: 0.56 ----------------------------?--------------------------- F----------------j-------------t-----------_---------------------------- Paving Pavers 1 i 8.00 130' 0.42 -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- 4 ------------- i ----------------------------- Paving •Pavin E ui ment 9 9 Equipment 2i 6.00 132, 0.36 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------1-------------F------------------------------------------ Paving • Rollers 2i 6.00 , 80 : 0.38 -------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------F----------------;-------------f---------------------------- ---------------- 4 ------------- ---------------------------- -------------- Paving Paving .Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97: 0.37 '---------------' ------------------ Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1: 6.00, 78; 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual Phase NameI Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip I Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6i 15.00, 0.001 103.00 14.70; 6.901 20.00:LD-Mix ;HDT_Mix iHHDT ---------------- ---------I----------'----------- h ----------t I Exhaust IPM2.5Total I----------�- '--------- I---------•-----I-------- --T N20 Grading 61 15.00: 0.001 14.00, 14.701 6.90: 20.001LD_Mix �HDT_Mix HHDT ------------------------------------%----------- PM2.5 PM2.5 --T---------- Building Construction 9 1 75.00 : 29.001 0.00 : 14.70 6.90: 20.00 1 LD_Mix 1 HDT_Mix i HHDT -------------- ?--------------- i ----------•----------- 0.4275 --------- 3.9000e- --T ---------- Paving 81 20.00 0.00: 0.00. 14.70 6.90: 20.00 -LD Mix 1HDT_Mix :HHDT %----------------------------------- --------------------•+--------- ----------►---------------- ----------- ---------- Architectural Coating 1 15.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90, 20.001 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0112 0.0000 0.0112 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.7000e- + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 + Off -Road 0.0410 0.4275 0.2301 3.9000e- 0.0219 0.0219 0.0204 0.0204 } 0.0000 35.6005 35.6005 9.7300e 0.0000 35.8438 004 003 ; 1 ' ' 1 ' Total 0.0410 0.4275 0.2301 3.9000e- 0.0112 0.0219 0.0331 1.7000e- 0.0204 0.0221 0.0000 35.6005 35.6005 9.7300e- 0.0000 35.8438 004 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 5.3000e- 0.0181 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 8.8000e- 1.000Oe- 9.8000e- 2.4000e- 1.000Oe- 3.4000e- ! 0.0000 4.0825 4.0825 4.4000e- 0.0000 4.0934 004 ; 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004 004 ; i i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Worker 7.5000e- 5.9000e- 6.3100e- 2.000Oe- 1.6500e- 1.000Oe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.000Oe- 4.5000e- + 0.0000 1.5579 1.5579 5.000Oe- 0.0000 1.5591 004 ; 004 003 005 003 005 ; 003 004 005 004 1 ; 005 Total 1.2800e- 0.0187 0.0103 6.000Oe- 2.5300e- 1.1000e- 2.6400e- 6.8000e- 1.1000e- 7.9000e- 0.0000 5.6404 5.6404 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.6525 003 004 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 1 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 1 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 4.3700e- 0.0000 4.3700e- 6.6000e- 0.0000 6.6000e- + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 003 003 004 ' 004 ' Off -Road 0.0410 0.4275 0.2301 3.9000e- - 0.0219 - 0.0219 - 0.0204 0.0204 0.0000 35.6005 35.6005 - 9.7300e - 0.0000 35.8438 004 003 Total 0.0410 0.4275 0.2301 3.9000e- 4.3700e- 0.0219 0.0263 6.6000e- 0.0204 0.0211 0.0000 35.6005 35.6005 9.7300e- 0.0000 35.8438 004 003 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 5.3000e- 0.0181 4.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 8.8000e- 1.000Oe- 9.8000e- 2.4000e- 1.000Oe- 3.4000e- 1 0.0000 4.0825 4.0825 4.4000e- 0.0000 4.0934 004 003 005 004 ; 004 004 004 004 004 004 004 i i i 1 1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 S 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4236 0.2138 n ----------------i------- i i _".-.""""""n ------- ------- ------- ------- -------4--------- Worker 7.5000e- 5.9000e- 6.3100e- 2.000Oe- 1.6500e- 1.000Oe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.000Oe- 4.5000e- _ 0.0000 1.5579 1.5579 5.000Oe- - 0.0000 1.5591 004 004 003 005 003 ; 005 003 ; 004 005 004 ' ' ' ' 005 1 1 1 Total 1.2800e- 0.0187 0.0103 6.000Oe- 2.5300e- 1.1000e- 2.6400e- 6.8000e- 1.1000e- 7.9000e- 0.0000 5.6404 5.6404 4.9000e. 0.0000 5.6525 714.4493 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0774 0.0000 0.0774 0.0416 0.0000 0.0416 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----------- ----------------------- i --___ --;------- ------- ------- -------------- i T -------+--- �� i ---------------------------------- _ _ Off -Road 0.0384 0.4236 0.2138 3.7000e- 0.0222 0.0222 0.0204 0.0204 0.0000 34.4493 34.4493 0.0106 0.0000 34.7132 004 i i i 1 1 Total 0.0384 0.4236 0.2138 3.7000e- 0.0774 0.0222 0.0996 0.0416 0.0204 0.0621 0.0000 0.0106 0.0000 34.7132 004 714.4493 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 7.000Oe- 2.4700e- 5.4000e- 1.000Oe- 1.2000e- 1.000Oe- 1.3000e- 3.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 5.000Oe- s 0.0000 0.5549 0.5549 6.000Oe- 0.0000 0.5564 005 003 004 005 ; 004 ; 005 004 005 005 005 i ; 005 004 s s Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4236 0.2138 i i i Worker 9.4000e- 7.3000e- 7.88OOe- 2.000Oe- 2.0600e- 1.000Oe- 2.0700e- 5.5000e- 1.000Oe- 5.6000e- _ ! 0.0000 1.9474 1.9474 - 6.000Oe- - 0.0000 1.9488 004 004 003 005 ; 003 ; 005 003 004 005 004 i 005 ; 0.0367 0.0000 s Total 1.0100e- 3.2000e- 8.4200e- 3.000Oe- 2.1800e- 2.000Oe- 2.2000e- 5.8000e- 2.000Oe- 6.1000e- 0.0000 2.5023 2.5023 1.2000e- 0.0000 2.5052 003 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0302 0.0000 0.0302 0.0162 0.0000 0.0162 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s i s Off -Road 0.0384 0.4236 0.2138 3.7000e- 0.0222 0.0222 0.0204 0.0204 1 0.0000 34.4493 34.4493 0.0106 0.0000 34.7132 004 s s Total 0.0384 0.4236 0.2138 3.7000e- 0.0302 0.0222 0.0524 0.0162 0.0204 0.0367 0.0000 34.4493 34.4493 0.0106 0.0000 34.7132 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM 10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 1 PM2.51 Category tons/yr MT/yr Y Hauling 7.000Oe- 2.4700e- 5.4000e- 1.000Oe- 1.2000e- 1.000Oe- 1.3000e- 3.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 1 0.0000 - 0.5549 - 0.5549 6.000Oe- - 0.0000 0.5564 005 003 004 005 004 005 ; 004 ; 005 005 005 j 005 ------------------------------------------------------- +--------------------- r -------A Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Ii 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1400e- i Worker 9.4000e- 7.3000e- 7.8800e- 2.000Oe- 2.0600e- 1.000Oe- 2.0700e- 5.5000e- 1.000Oe- 5.6000e- i 0.0000 1.9474 1.9474 6.000Oe- 0.0000 T 1.9488 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 ' ' 1 ' ' ' + ' Total 1.0100e- 3.2000e- 8.4200e- 3.000Oe- 2.1800e- 2.000Oe- 2.2000e- 5.8000e- 2.000Oe- 6.1000e- 0.0000 2.5023 2.5023 1.2000e- 0.0000 2.5052 003 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.51 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1324 1.1286 0.7728 1.1400e- 0.0760 0.0760 0.0714 0.0714 } 0.0000 - 102.2095 - 102.2095 0.0252 0.0000 102.8390 003 ; ; 1 1 1 • ' 1 Total 0.1324 1.1286 0.7728 1.1400e- 0.0760 0.0760 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 102.2095 102.2095 0.0252 0.0000102.8390 1 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 INBi.7.tal I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 S Vendor 5.8000e- 0.1603 0.0455 3.1000e- 7.7600e- 1.3800e- 9.1400e- 2.2400e- 1.3200e- 3.5600e- } 0.0000 30.5000 30.5000 2.8500e- 0.0000 30.5712 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 I 003 1.1400e- Worker 0.0160 0.0125 0.1340 3.7000e- 0.0350 2.4000e- 0.0352 9.2900e- 2.2000e- 9.5100e- ? 0.0000 33.1058 33.1058 9.7000e 0.0000 T 331300 004 ; 004 ; 003 004 003 i 004 ; 0.0714 : Total 0.0218 0.1728 0.1795 6.8000e- 0.0428 1.6200e- 0.0444 0.0115 1.5400e- 0.0131 0.0000 63.6058 63.6058 3.8200e- 0.0000 63.7011 004 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1324 1.1286 0.7728 1.1400e- 0.0760 0.0760 0.0714 0.0714 i 0.0000 102.2093 102.2093 0.0252 0.0000 102.8389 003 S Total 0.1324 1.1286 0.7728 1.1400e- 0.0760 0.0760 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 102.2093 102.2093 0.0252 0.0000 102.8389 003 1 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PPA10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 INBio-7'otal I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 ± 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 i . - - - - - - - . - - h-------1-------1---------------1-------1-------1-------1------- 1--------------- � . _______ _______ _ _ Vendor 5.8000e- 1 0.1603 1 0.0455 1 3.1000e- 1 7.7600e- 1 1.3800e- 1 9.1400e- 1 2.2400e- 1 1.3200e- 1 3.5600e- } 0.0000 1 30.5000 1 30.5000 1 2.8500e 1 0.0000 T 30.5712 003 004 003 ; 003 .. 1 1 1 1 1 003 003 003 003 003 • - - - - - - - - - - - ry------- -------- -------- ------ 1 1 1 - - - - --- ;------- ;------- ,------- 1 ;------- ;-------T Worker 0.0160 0.0125 0.1340 3.7000e- 0.0350 2.4000e- 0.0352 9.2900e- 2.2000e- 1 9.5100e- } 0.0000 1 33.1058 1 33.1058 1 9.7000e- 0.0000 1 331300 AA 004 004 003 004 003 004 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 Total 0.0218 0.1728 0.1795 6.8000e- 0.0428 1.6200e- 0.0444 0.0115 1.5400e- 0.0131 0.0000 63.6058 63.6058 3.8200e- 0.0000 63.7011 004 003 003 003 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.3215 1 2.8068 1 2.1097 1 3.2300e- 1 0.1800 1 0.1800 1 0.1692 1 0.1692 ± 0.0000 1 285.3207 1 285.3207 1 0.0699 0.0000 1 287.0683 003 ; y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 0.3215 2.8068 2.1097 3.2300e- 0.1800 0.1800 0.1692 0.1692 0.0000 285.3207 285.3207 0.0699 0.0000 287.0683 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 , i , i , Total i Vendor 0.0144 0.4237 0.1169 8.7000e- 0.0219 3.1000e- 0.0250 6.32OOe- 2.9600e- 9.2800e- 0.0000 85.7286 85.7286 7.7000e- 0.0000 85.9211 004 003 ; 003 ; 003 ; 003 i ; 003 ; 0.1800 0.1800 Worker 0.0408 0.0309 0.3360 1.000Oe- 0.0988 6.6000e- 0.0995 0.0262 6.1000e- 0.0269 } 0.0000 90.7485 90.7485 2.41OOe- 0.0000 90.8088 003 ; ; 004 ; ; 004 + ; ; 003 ; 285.3203 285.3203 Total 0.0552 0.4546 0.4529 1.8700e- 0.1207 3.7600e- 0.1245 0.0326 3.5700e- 0.0361 0.0000 176.4772 176.4772 0.0101 0.0000 176.7299 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.3215 2.8068 2.1097 3.23OOe- 0.1800 0.1800 0.1692 0.1692 } 0.0000 285.3203 - 285.3203 0.0699 0.0000 287.0679 003 , i , i , Total 0.3215 2.8068 2.1097 3.2300e- 0.1800 0.1800 0.1692 0.1692 0.0000 285.3203 285.3203 0.0699 0.0000 287.0679 003 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio -0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ T Paving 4.3000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _______ __n -------r------ ------- ------- -------'+------- ---------------i-------T-------i----------- - Vendor 0.0144 0.4237 0.1169 8.7000e- 0.0219 3.1000e- 0.0250 6.3200e- 2.9600e- 9.2800e- 0.0000 85.7286 85.7286 7.7000e 0.0000 T 85.9211 004 003 003 003 003 i 003 . - - - . - - - - - - ------- -------_ ---- ----4------- ,--_ _ ;------_ ;------- ;-------.-------_ '------------------------. Worker 0.0408 0.0309 0.3360 1.000Oe- 0.0988 6.6000e- 0.0995 - 0.0262 6.1000e- 0.0269 1 } 0.0000 90.7485 90.7485 2.4100e 0.0000 90.8088 003 004 004 ; 003 i ' ' y t ' ' Total 0.0552 0.4546 0.4529 1.8700e- 0.1207 3.7600e- 0.1245 0.0326 3.5700e- 0.0361 0.0000 176.4772 1176.4772 0.0101 0.0000 176.7299 003 003 003 003 3.5 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •• 7.1200e- 0.0726 0.0622 9.000Oe- 4.1800e- 4.1800e- 3.8600e- 3.8600e- - 0.0000 8.4938 - 8.4938 2.5700e- 0.0000 8.5581 003 005 ; 003 ; CO3 003 ; 003 AA 003 ; ------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ T Paving 4.3000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004--;---------------- ' ' 1 ' : ' ' -770622 Total 7.5500e- 9.000Oe- 4.1800e- 4.1800e- 3.8600e- 3.8600e- 0.0000 8.4938 8.4938 2.5700e- 0.0000 8.5581 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.5500e- Worker 4.5000e- 3.4000e- 3.7300e- 1.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.000Oe- 1.1100e- 2.9000e- 1.000Oe- 3.000Oe- i 0.0000 1.0083 1.0083 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0090 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 : ; ; 005 4.1800e- 4.1800e- Total 4.5000e- 3.4000e- 3.7300e- 1.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.000Oe- 1.1100e- 2.9000e- 1.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0083 1.0083 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0090 003 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 7.1200e- 0.0726 0.0622 9.000Oe- 4.18OOe- 4.1800e- 3.8600e- 3.8600e- 0.0000 8.4937 8.4937 2.5700e- 0.0000 8.5581 003 ; 005 ; ; 003 ; 003 ; ; 003 ; 003 003 A Paving 4.3000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 i Total 7.5500e- 0.0726 0.0622 9.000Oe- 4.1800e- 4.1800e- 3.8600e- 3.8600e- 0.0000 8.4937 8.4937 2.5700e- 0.0000 8.5581 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •' 1.4900e- ' 0.0100 9.2700e- ' 1.000Oe- ' 7.5000e- 7.5000e- ' 7.5000e- ' 7.5000e- 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 i 1.2000e- ' 0.0000 1.2797 003 003 005 004 __..______ ' i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 9.2700e- 1.000Oe- ---------------------------+--------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------r-------* Worker •' 4.5000e- 3.4000e- ' 3.7300e- ' 1.000Oe- ' 1.1000e- ' 1.000Oe- ' 1.1100e- 2.9000e- 1.000Oe- 3.000Oe- --------------------- - -------- - - - - - - i 0.0000 1.0083 1.0083 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0090 004 004 003 005 003 005 CO3 004 005 004 + ; 005 ' ' ' ' ' i 1 1 Total 4.5000e- 3.4000e- 3.7300e- 1.000Oe- 1.1000e- 1.000Oe- 1.1100e- 2.9000e- 1.000Oe- 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0083 1.0083 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0090 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.1276 0.0000 ' O.Ci000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •' 1.4900e- ' 0.0100 9.2700e- ' 1.000Oe- ' 7.5000e- 7.5000e- ' 7.5000e- ' 7.5000e- 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 i 1.2000e- ' 0.0000 1.2797 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 004 ' ' ' ' ' i Total 0.1291 0.0100 9.2700e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 7.S000e- 7.5000e- 7.S000e- 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.2797 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A Off-Road 1.4900e- 0.0100 9.2700e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- } 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.2797 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 004 A Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0100 9.2700e- 1.000Oe- t Worker 3.4000e- 2.6000e- 2.8000e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.0000 0.7562 0.7562 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.7567 004 004 003 005 004 ; 005 ; 004 004 005 004 + 005 ; 7.5000e- 0.0000 1.2766 Total 3.4000e- 2.6000e- 2.8000e- 1.000Oe- 8.2000e- 1.000Oe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.000Oe- 2.2000e- 0.0000 0.7562 0.7562 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.7567 004 11 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I IPM2.5Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.1276 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A Off-Road 1.4900e- 0.0100 9.2700e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- } 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.2797 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 004 i Total 0.1291 0.0100 9.2700e- 1.000Oe- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- 7.5000e- 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.2000e- 0.0000 1.2797 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PPA10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 x0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------------------------------------------------------T-------i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - - - - - - - - - - -N-------1-------1-------1-------1-------•\-------7-------1-------1-------T-------- . . . . . ------------------------- ---- - Worker 3.4000e- 2.6000e- 2.8000e- 1.00OOe- 8.2000e- 1.00OOe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.00OOe- 2.2000e- i 0.0000 0.7562 0.7562 2.00OOe- 0.0000 T 0.7567 004 ; 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 ; 004 005 ' 1 ' ' ' 1 Total 3.4000e- 2.6000e- 2.8000e- 1.00OOe- 8.2000e- 1.00OOe- 8.3000e- 2.2000e- 1.00OOe- 2.2000e- 0.0000 0.7562 0.7562 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.7567 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 I PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category .....................................C --------------F----------- tons/yr + ---------- --------------------- ; 16.60 ----------------------- Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces MT/yr Mitigated 0.1436 0.5274 1.4250 4.1000e- 0.3322 4.8500e- 0.3371 0.0890 4.5600e- 0.0935 + 0.0000 377.0624 377.0624 0.0191 0.0000 377.5404 ...••..••••.•.•.•....••r Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 003 ; 003 ; ; ; 003 ; 0.00 Unmitigated 0.1682 0.7049 2.0610 6.6800e- 0.5595 7.7000e- 0.5672 0.1498 7.2400e- 0.1571 0.0000 614.2511 614.2511 0.0284 0.0000 614.9613 0 003 003 539.05 295.17 003 876,120 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Library 651.26 539.05 295.17 1,475,325 876,120 .....................................C --------------F----------- Pass -by + ---------- --------------------- ; 16.60 ----------------------- Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 44 44 ..................................................... ...••..••••.•.•.•....••r Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces F------------ +----------- --------------------- 8.40 ------------------------- Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 �----------------- ; 0 ; 0 Total 651.26 539.05 295.17 1,475,325 876,120 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Library ; 16.60 8.40 6.90 • 52.00 43.00 5.00 44 44 12 ...••..••••.•.•.•....••r Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces ----------r----------------- ; 16.60 8.40 6.90 ----- ; 0.00 _Y r 0.00 1 -----------r-----------r---------- 0.00 ; 0 �----------------- ; 0 ; 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 - 0 -------- 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS MCY I SBUS I MH Library 0.552373• 0.0442291 0.2111231 0.0175031 0.0057971 0.0244551 0.0156851 0.001637: 0.0016331 0.004830i 0.0005831 0.001041 Mitigated 0.119112` --f-------T-------4--------4--------4--------4--------�-------�------- ' 4--------4 - - - - - - - Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.552373• 0.0442291 0.2111231 0.119112: 0.017503: 0.005797: 0.0244551 0.015685: 0.001637: 0.0016331 0.0048301 0.000583: 0.001041 -------------------- _ - - - - - -----------------4--------4--------4--------4--------+-------+-------+-------+---------------- : - - - - - - Parkin Lot 9 0.552373• 0.044229' 0.211123' 0.119112' 0.017503' 0.005797' 0.024455' 0.015685' 0.001637' 0.001633' 0.004830' 0.000583' 0.001041 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C 9 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category I tons/yr IMT/yr Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 66.7969 66.7969 2.7600e- 5.7000e- ' 67.0358 Mitigated ., .. , 003 004 -------------------- - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- - - - - - - -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------T-------±-------,- Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 66.7969 66.7969 2.7600e 5.7000e 67.0358 Unmitigated :: ' i ' : , , 003 ; 004 ., _------- : ------ ------ -------------,-------;--------------T-------y--------------n---------------------------T,------- NaturalGas 2.5800e- ' 0.0235 ' 0.0197 ' 1.4000e- ' 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- ' 1.7900e- + 0.0000 25.5812 :25.5812 4.9000e- ' 4.7000e- ' 25.7333 Mitigated 003 - 004 003 003 003 003 i 004 004 K------T------T------T------T------T------T------Y------T-------r------- : ; i NaturalGas 2.5800e- 0.0235 0.0197 1.4000e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- - - - - - - --------T------T------T------t 0.0000 25.5812 25.5812 4.9000e- 4.7000e- - - - - - - - 25.7333 Unmitigated 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e S Use PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 1 I I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Library 479374 +, 2.5800e- 0.0235 0.0197 1.4000e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- + 0.0000 - 25.5812 25.5812 4.9000e- 4.7000e- 25.7333 i; 003 ; 004 003 003 003 003 i ; 004 ; 004 ; Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s, i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s. s Total 2.5800e- 0.0235 0.0197 1.4000e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 0.0000 25.5812 25.5812 4.9000e- 4.7000e- 25.7333 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Library 479374 + 2.5800e- 0.0235 0.0197 1.4000e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- ► 0.0000 25.5812 25.5812 4.9000e- 4.7000e- 25.7333 s, 003 ; ; 004 003 003 003 , 003 ; ; 004 ; 004 Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces +, Parking Lot 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s. s Total 2.5800e- 0.0235 0.0197 1.4000e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 1.7900e- 0.0000 25.5812 25.5812 4.9000e- 4.7000e- 25.7333 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 24 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Mitigated ElectricityTotal CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Library 197053 + 62.7854 2.5900e- 5.4000e- 63.0100 +, 003 004 +. Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 As Surfaces ; +, +. Parking Lot 12590.2 4.0115 1.7000e- 3.000Oe- 4.0259 +, 004 005 ' Total 66.7969 2.7600e- 5.7000e- 67.0358 003 004 Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail ElectricityTotal CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Library 197053 +- 62.7854 2.5900e- 5.4000e- 63.0100 ►. ; 003 004 +. Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; +; Parking Lot r 12590.2 + 4.0115 1.7000e 3.000Oe 4.0259 +, 004 005 1 ' Total 66.7969 2.7600e. 5.7000e- 67.0358 003 004 6.0 Area Detail £00 900 coo coo Soo £00 £00 Soo Soo -90000'1 -@004L'4 -aoob1'b 0000'0 Soo Soo ' 0000'0 ' -•009L'Z ' -@0000'Z : 99010 Pale6!8wun £00 Soo - - - - - -r- - - - ---------y-------------------- -900Z4'4 0000'0 -00000'6 -•0041'4 -00041,'4 0000'0 -•0000'L -000006 -a00Z17'4 0000'0 .00000.E -90000'6 -@0000'1 -90000'[. 0000'0 -a009L'Z -00000'Z 9506'0 lelol E00 500 £00 £004 900 500 ; Soo 900 £00 500 400 -900Zb b 0000 0 1 -90000' [. -•0041'4 -90041'4 0000'0 -110000' l -@0000' 1, -•0000' [. -@0000' [. 0000'0 -00091,7 -90000 Z •00002 •• bu!deospue� i-------`-------`-------`-------' ---*-------1 -------`-------`-------`--------------------------------- `--------- --------- ---------- slonpad 00000 0000'0 0000'0 -0000'0 0000'0 00000 0000 0 0000'0 00000 00000. LZ60 0 jawnsuoO ' 6u!1e00 00000 0000,0 0000,0 0000,0 0000,0 0000'0 T 00000 0000,0 1 0000'0 00000 8Z1,0'0 lejnlo@l!4ojH J!/1W JR/suol tio6ale0QnS 5'ZWd 5'ZWd lelol OLWd OLWd SZWd 9'ZWd lelol O1Wd MINd 4H0 ZOO lelol ZOO -o!SN ZOO -018 Ileloi S'ZWd 9200 OZN 4H0 ZOOlelol ZOO o!8N ZOO-019 lelol9'ZWd isneyx3 an!1!6nd Old isneyx3 an!i!find ZOS 00 xON 000 pa;e 51Puun AaoB9}e3gng /(q eeiV Z'9 coo 900 coo coo Soo Soo Soo Soo coo 900 -00024'4 0000'0 -90000'1 -@004L'4 -aoob1'b 0000'0 • -90000'1 -00000'1 -00000'L -90000'1, ' ' 0000'0 ' -•009L'Z ' -@0000'Z : 99010 Pale6!8wun . ..... ------'-------- - - - - -r- - - - - - - ------- •------- - - - - - - - - - - - -r- - - - ---------y-------------------- c00 Soo coo £o0 f Soo S00 S00 Soo ; ; £00 ; 50o ; -a00Z17'4 0000'0 -a0000'L -@004[.'4 -@0017L t7 0000'0 s -@0000'L -@0000'1 -@0000'1 -90000'[. 0000'0 -•oo9['Z -a0000'Z 9501'0 pale6ii!W j!/1W ��(/suol tio6ale0 I 5'ZWd 5'ZWd lelol OLWd OLWd •ZOO OZN 4H0 ZOO lelol ZOO -o!SN ZOO -018 Ileloi S'ZWd isneyx3 an!l16nd 01Wd isneyx3 9n!30nd ZOS 00 xON OOZI eeiv sainseew uoi;eBi4!w L•9 lenuuy'(luno(] abueap - L aseud - Need su011 6M AV 09:1, � L<OZ/9Z/t :ale(] 6£ 10 SZ a6ed t-'E'9WZ'poW331eO :uOlSJan PON331e(] CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2O16.3.1 Page 26 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 0.0128 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating ---------------------,--------------,-------------- -------,-------r------ Consumer 0.0927 ---- ------ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 Products ;' -------i-------i------- ------- -------i---------------i--------------r-------i--------------- Landscaping 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.1500e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- ----------------- 0.0000 4.1400e- 4.140Oe- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 r 4.4200e- 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003 ' ' ' 1 1 ' ' 1 Total 0.1056 2.00OOe- 2.1500e. 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe. 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 4.1400e- 4.1400e- 1.00OOe. 0.0000 4.4200e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy pa;ebiu un asn pueq Aq aa}eM Z'1 400 L9L0'b 8000L'E OZLO'0 EPZ9'E Pale6lllwun b00 E00 L17L9'E -00009'Z --0089'6 900E'E Pale6!im JA/1W tio6aleO -ZOO OZN I bHO ZOOlelol lenuuy 'Alunoo abueap - L aseyd - Wd Suoll 6L99 AV 09: L L LLOZ/9Z/L :ale(] L£ JO LZ abed LT'9LOZ'POW331eO :uolSJan pOW33PO 0 LSLO'4 -a00040L'£ OZLO'0 £PZ9'£ moi 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 'r 0/0 l0-1 bullied .......1-------L-------L-------'4-----J........... } seoepnS llegdsV 0000'00000'0 0000'0 0000'0 'i 0/0 -uoN I-430 1700 ;} 17LL999'0 ; L9L0'b--OOOL'E OZL0'0 EbZ9'E '�/9ZEZ9E'C' tiejq!l JA/1W le6w asn puei I asn joop aZOO OZN PHO ZOO 18101 lno/joopul pa;ebiu un asn pueq Aq aa}eM Z'1 400 L9L0'b 8000L'E OZLO'0 EPZ9'E Pale6lllwun b00 E00 L17L9'E -00009'Z --0089'6 900E'E Pale6!im JA/1W tio6aleO -ZOO OZN I bHO ZOOlelol lenuuy 'Alunoo abueap - L aseyd - Wd Suoll 6L99 AV 09: L L LLOZ/9Z/L :ale(] L£ JO LZ abed LT'9LOZ'POW331eO :uolSJan pOW33PO CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 28 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services Indoor/OutTotal CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Library 0.28986 / + 3.3006 9.5800e- 2.5000e- 3.6147 0.566714 ±; 003 004 Other Non- 0/0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; +; Parking Lot 0/0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.3006 9.5800e. 2.5000e- 3.6147 003 004 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 609£'S 00000 6LZ6'0 6£96'Z OZN Flejol ZOO 1010i 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 0000'0 'r 0 10-1 6u'NJed 1} ' } sooe}ins llegdsy 0000'00000'0 0000'0 0000'0 'r 0 --ON Jayl0 609£'S 0000'0 6LZ6'0 6£96'Z 't 99'06 tij-gj jA/1W suol asn puei posodsla aZOO OZN 17HO ZOOlelol alseM pa}e�w u � ash pue-1 Aq alseM Z'8 609£'S 0000'0 6LZL'0 6£9L'Z '• pale6!l!wun -- ---- -------'-------i------I------------- 90997 0000'0 6£90'0 6680'6 pale6R!W JA/1W -ZOO OZN I 4HO ZOO 1010i Jea)Jo a;e3_ lenuuy 'Alunoo abueap - L aseyd - IJed SUM 6M vqv 09: L L LLOZ/9Z/L :ale(] LE 10 6Z a6ed L'E'MZ'WhW 13PO :uoisaan poW331e:D CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 30 of 31 Date: 1/26/2017 11:50 AM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 1 - Orange County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emerciencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I Land Use tons MT/yr Library 5.33 + 1.0819 0.0639 0.0000 2.6805 L 1. Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; +; Parking Lot 0 +: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0819 0.0639 0.0000 2.6805 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emerciencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number u01181868A 0' 6 6 jenuuy 'AjunoZ) abueap - 6 aseyd - �Jed suoi-1 6039 AV 09:66 L�OZ/9Z/6 :aleO �£Jo 6C abed VC'9WZ'POADDleO :uoisaan PONEDPO CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 1/26/2017 3:04 PM 6819 Lions Park- Off-site Improvments CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS ONLY - Orange County, Annual 6819 Lions Park- Off-site Improvments CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS ONLY Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2018 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS ONLY Land Use - Park Ave- total 17,430sf: 580ft x —28ft = 16,240sf paving (includes 27 prkg spcs) & remainder landscaping. Anaheim Ave- total 2,350sf: 145ft x —15ft = 2,175sf & remainder landscaping. Construction Phase - Off-site improvements to occur during Phase 1 (July 2017 to December 2018). Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Water Mitigation - n tblLandUse tblLandUse 18,410.00 I 18,415.00 1,370.00 I 1,365.00 se I LandUseSquareFeet I 18,410.00 I 18,415.00 se I LandUseSquareFeet I 1,370.00 I 1,365.00 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e N2O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 PM2.5 I I CO2 Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 3.8500e- 0.0304 0.0225 4.00OOe- 7.9000e- 1.7600e 2.5500e- 1.7000e- 1.6300e- 1.8000e- 0.0000 3.4077 3.4077 8.4000e- 0.0000 3.4286 II 003 I II I I ( 005 I 004 I I I 003 I 003 I 004 I I 1 003 I 003 I I I I I 004 I I I I I I I Maximum 3.8500e- 0.0304 0.0225 4.0000e- 7.9000e- 1.7600e- 2.5500e- 1.7000e- 1.6300e- 1.8000e- 0.0000 3.4077 3.4077 8.400Oe- 0.0000 3.4286 003 003 003 005 004 003 003 004 003 003 004 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 3.8500e- I 0.0304 I 0.0225 4.00OOe- 16.2000e- 11.7600e- 1 2.3900e- 11.5000e- 11.6300e- 11.7800e- I 0.0000 I 3.4077 I 3.4077 18.4000e- I 0.0000 I 3.4286 11 003 I I I 005 ( 004 I 003 I 003 I 004 I 003 I 003 I I I I 004 I Maximum 3.8500e- 0.0304 0.0225 4.00OOe- 6.2000e- 1.7600e- 2.3900e- 1.5000e- 1.6300e- 1.7800e- 0.0000 3.4077 3.4077 8.400Oe- 0.0000 3.4286 003 005 004 003 003 004 003 003 004 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.45 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 0.42 -----------------------I--------------------� Paving TRollers -----------1 i 1r 7.00 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ---- 97i ---------- 0.3 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.52 0.00 6.27 11.76 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0.45 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation -----------------------i------------------------ Site Preparation ----------------------- Paving IGraders ITractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 --------- (Cement and Mortar Mixers I 1i 1 I — 1 41 I 8.001 --- ------+----------*----------- 8.001 6.001 I 187 971 I 91 I 0.41 0.3 I 0.56 I ------------ ------------r--------------------rt-------------r---------r----------r----------- Pavi ng I Pavers 1 11 7.001 1301 0.42 -----------------------I--------------------� Paving TRollers -----------1 i 1r 7.00 I --(----------- 80� 0.3 ----------------------- Paving ----1 ITractors/Loaders/Backhoes -------I---------I 1� 7.00 ---- 97i ---------- 0.3 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Vehicle PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 Class Class Site Preparation 21 5.0011 0.0011L 0.001 14.701 6.9011 Category tons/yr IHDT_Mix IHHDT 111 Paving - i - i 18.00i O.00i 0.00 14.70 -----20-.0011-D-Mix 6.901 20.00 LD_Mix-�HDT_Mix 2.7000e- -IHHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotaICO21 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust I I I 12.7000e- 1 0.0000 12.7000e- 3.000Oe- 0.0000 13.000Oe- I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 II I I I I Off -Road - jIjI -4.3000e I I I I004 1 lI004lI 005 lI lI 005 1 I 1 I I I j j j j ____12200j 1 1 1434j j0j5.2600e-j2.1800e- 0.0000 2.4000e-j2.4000e- 0e2.2000e- 0.0000 0.4534 0. 4060e- .0000 0.4569 ll 004 I 003 I 003 I I I 004 l 004 I I 004 l 004 1 I I I 004 I l II I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Total 4.3000e- 6.2600e- 2.1800e- 0.0000 2.7000e- 2.4000e- 5.1000e- 3.000Oe- 2.2000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 0.4634 0.4534 1.4000e- 0.0000 0.4569 004 003 003 004 004 004 005 004 004 004 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotalC(32 CH4 N20 CO2e CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total PM2.5 CO2 CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 II 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 0.0003 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I II --- ---�------i------k-----1------ I I I I i ----- I �----- I L-----�-----L----- I I I 1 }------L-----------�----'--i-----1-----1---- I 1 I I I Vendor II 0.0000 II 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I ( 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0003 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 ( 0.000(1 1 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 II --- --ll------ 1 -t-----'�------H-----i-------------1------i------t-----�------f------F------1-----1------1---- I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I Worker II 1.0000;- .000 1 1.0000;- 11.1000e- I 0.0000 1 3.00OOe- I 0.0000 13.00OOe- 11.00OOe- I 0.0000 11.00OOe- 1 0.0000 1 0.0260 I 0.0260 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 ( 0.0260 II 005 II I 005 I I 004 1 I I I 005 I I I I 005 I I 005 I I 1 I 005 ( I I I I I I I I I I I Total 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.1000e- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0260 0.0260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0260 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 8 I I I 1.00OOe- 1 0.0000 1 1.00OOe- ( 1.00OOe- 1 0.0000 1 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 TOM 004 I I 004 I 005 I I 005 I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----- 7d 11------i------t-----t------ F-----t-----t-----F------f------t------F------f------F---- - ------1------i----- Off-Road II 4.3000;- 1 5.2600;- 1 2.1800;- 1 0.0000 1 2.4000e- 1 2.4000 V- I 1 2.2000e- 1 2.2000e- 1 0.0000 1 0.4534 I 0.4534 ( 1.4000;- I 0.0000 I 0.4569 II 004 I 003 I 003 I I 004 I 004 I 004 I 004 I I I I 004 I I II I I Total 4.3000e- 5.2600e- 2.1800e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 2.4000e- 3.4000e- 2.2000e- 2.3000e- 0.0000 0.4534 0.4534 1.4000e- 0.0000 0.4569 004 003 003 004 004 004 [-1.0000e- 005 004 004 004 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOT CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 FugitiveExhaust Exhaust PM2.5 Bio - CO2 NBio- CH4 N2 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I CO2 ITotalCO2 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 II 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I II ----L-----------a I I ----------- 1.5200e- I I------a-----------I------------ I I I 2.4610 I I ------=------G------L-------I-----4------=----- I 1 I I I Vendor 'I 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 II 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 II i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 11 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 11 Worker 11 1.0000.- I 1 1.00OOe- I 1 1.1000e- I 1 0.0000 I 1 3.00OOe- I 1 0.0000 I 13.00OOe- 11.0000.- I I 0.0000 I I 1 1.00OOe- 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0260 I 1 0.0260 I 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0260 II 005 II 1 005 I 1 004 I I I 1 005 I 11 1 005 I 1 005 I ( I 1 005 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I Total 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.1000e- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 0.0000 3.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.0260 0.0260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0260 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 3.3 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ITotalCO21 CO2 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 2.6300e- 0.0249 0.0184 3.00OOe- 11.5200e- 1.5200e- 1.4100e- 1.4100e- 0.0000 2.4610 2.4610 6.8000e 0.00002.4781 II 003 I I I 005 I 003 1 003 1 003 1 003 004 I I Paving 11 5.5000e- I I I ( 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 II 004 Total 3.1800e- 0.0249 0.0184 3.00OOe- 1.5200e- 1.5200e- 1.410Oe- 1.410Oe- 0.0000 2.4610 2.4610 6.8000e-0.0000 2.4781 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 alis-uo uoilonilsuoo pale !--j 400E00 400 £00 400 £00 E00 900 900 £00 E00 68L4'Z 0000'0 -0-0008'9 0694'2 0694'2 0000'0 -•0044'4 -0-0044'6 0000'0 -000Z9'G -•OOZ9'6 -00000'£ 4860'0 OUT -0-0084'£ lelol I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 00002 1 0000'0 ( 00000 1 0000'0 +L0000'0 +'-0—O00'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 I I I I I I I I 170o I I I I coo I coo 68L17'Z ( 0000'0 I -a0008'9 I 0694'2 I 0694'2 I 0000'0 I -900617'6 I -ao06t'6 I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I boo p 1 i 0000'0 1 0000'0 I II I I-a000S'S II 6wned I I I I I 1 I II ' i coo 1 coo I I soo I I I coo y I-a00ZS'6 I-a00ZS'6 I I -90000'E 1 17810'0 1 617ZO'O 1 -900£97 11 peob-g0 JA/1W ido J(/suo; tio6a;e0 I I I I 400 j j 400 j 400 j 1700 j 900 j coo j 400 j 1700 jj LL9b'0 -----i 1 0000'0 -----i------i------ I 1 00000'6 I I 4/94'0 I 1 4/94'0 -----+-----i-------F-----4----- I I 0000'0 1 -9000£'6 I I 1 0000'0 I 1-a00o£'6 I----- I-ao000'S i-----i—OaL6 ZOO 1 -00006'17 t.1 I le;ol 9'ZWd S'ZWd le;ol O6Wd O6Wd 0000'0iI 0-00-0—'0 —tI —0-00-0—'0— 0000'0 -----t------t tI 0000'0I 0000'0 ----I— 9Z00 OZN 4H0 ZOO 18101 -o!9N ZOO o!8 S'ZWd ;sneyx3 an!;!find p6Wd ;sneyx3 an!;!find ZOS 00 xON 9021 alis-uo uoilonilsuoo pale !--j .lig-_}p uoilonilsuoo PaielimMun S00 400 400 400 400 900 £00 400 400 LL94'0 0000'0 .0000'6 4L94'O 4L94'0 0000'0 0000E1 0000'0 .000£'6 .00009 0000'0 -00006'4 -.0000'6 -00068'6 -00008'6 -•000£'2 1e3o1 I ! I S00 I I I I 400 j j 400 j 400 j 1700 j 900 j coo j 400 j 1700 jj LL9b'0 -----i 1 0000'0 -----i------i------ I 1 00000'6 I I 4/94'0 I 1 4/94'0 -----+-----i-------F-----4----- I I 0000'0 1 -9000£'6 I I 1 0000'0 I 1-a00o£'6 I----- I-ao000'S i-----i—OaL6 I 0000'0 I 1 -00006'17 t.1 I I 0-0000'/ 02.0 L–F— I 1 00068'6 02 8 I I .000B'6 i-----i--ooe.Z 1 I .000£'2 II JaIJOM --------- I 11 tI 0000'0 iI 0000'0iI 0-00-0—'0 —tI —0-00-0—'0— 0000'0 -----t------t tI 0000'0I 0000'0 ----I— — — — — 1I 000 — — — II 0'0tI 0000'0 -----—t— 0000'0I 0000'0 ----i------I-------- 0000'0 Jopuan----- �0000'0 -- I I 1 I 0 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 00000 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 0000'0 1 00000 8 6u!lneH JA/1W a (/suo; ItiO6a;e0 ZOO IZOOle;ol le;ol S'ZWd S'ZWd le;ol O6Wd O6Wd 9200 OZN 4H0 o!8N ZOO o!9 9'ZWd lsneyx3 an!;!6nd O6Wd ;sneyx3 an!;!find ZOS 00 xON 9021 .lig-_}p uoilonilsuoo PaielimMun Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N2O CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotaICO21 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 II 0.0000 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 II ---Vendor --- ------ I I ------a----5-d-4- I --I------4------ I I I ------1------�-----a------4------�-----4-----J+---;O-j-4 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I ---4----- I I p 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 II ______ II ----il------f------t-----I------t-----+------ Worker N 2.3000e- I I I I 1 1.8000e- 1 1.8900e- I I 1 1.00OOe I I 1 4.9000e- I I I 0.0000 I I _____I �S.00OOe I I------�-----i------ 1 1.3000e- I I 1 0.0000 I I I I t-----t-----+------4-----�------k----- 1 1.3000e- 1 0.0000 I 1 1 0.4674 I I 1 0.4674 I I (1.00OOe I I 1 0.0000 I I 1 0.4677 II 004 II I 004 I 003 1 I I 005 I I 004 I I I I 004 I I 004 I ! 004 I I I I I I I I 005 I I I I I Total 2.3000e- 1.80OOe- 1.8900e- 1.00OOe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4674 0.4674 1.00OOe-0.0000 0.4677 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 28 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 Orange County, Annual Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 0.54 1000sgft 0.01 541.00 i 0 --------------- ----------------- ------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 36.15 1000sgft 0.83 36,152.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Precipitation Freq (Days) Operational Year N20 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) 30 2020 0.006 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - Phase 2- new 9,281 sf NCC building by renovation/expansion of existing 8,740 sf library = 541 sf newly construced portion of building, 28,553 sf walkways/plazas, & 7,599 sf landscaping/OS. Construction Phase - Construction to start February 2019 and end February 2020. Demolition - Grading - In land use section Phase 1 estimated as —0.86 acres. Per developer, cut 156 cubic feet - fill 80 cubic feet = 76 cubic feet cut. 76 cubic feet = 2.81 cubic yards cut. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Lions Park is located in downtown City of Costa Mesa. OCTA Route 43 stop Park -19th located across Park Avenue (-53 feet or 0.01 miles from site). Water Mitigation - Per California Green Building Standards. Waste Mitigation - AB 939 requires each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed 401i 15 ----------------------------- �...-------------------------- -------------------------------I.......................... tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 0.86 -----------------------------_ ----------------------------- r------------------------------ -------------------------- tblGrading Material Exported 0.00 2.81 .. .. ---------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------- tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2018 2020 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.1240 1.2529 0.9801 1.7200e- 0.0263 0.0726 0.7989 7.3800e- 0.0668 0.0742 1 0.0000 156.4263 156.4263 0.0402 0.0000 157.4313 003 ; ; 003 .,s ---------:------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------- ------- ----------------------- 2020 0.0314 0.1544 0.1403 2.5000e- 3.4800e- 8.6000e- 0.7121 9.3000e- 7.9700e- 8.9100e- 0.0000 21.7964 21.7964 5.3900e- 0.0000 21.9311 004 ; 003 003 ; 004 003 003' 003 ' , ' Maximum 0.1240 1.2529 0.9801 1.7200e- 0.0263 0.0726 0.0989 7.3800e. 0.0668 0.0000 156.4263 '156.4263 0.0402 0.0000 157.4313 003 003 003 003 7.0742 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 l'otal CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total1 Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.1240 1.2529 0.9801 1.7200e- 0.0249 0.0726 0.0974 6.8100e- 0.0668 0.0736 i 0.0000 156.4261 156.4261 0.0402 0.0000 157.4312 003 ; 003 A , 2020 0.0314 0.1544 0.1403 2.5000e- 3.4800e- 8.6000e- 0.0121 9.3000e- 7.9700e- 8.9100e- 0.0000 21.7964 21.7964 5.3900e- 0.0000 21.9311 004 003 003 ; 004 003 003 003 1 , ' t 1 ' 1 Maximum 0.1240 1.2529 0.9801 1.7200e- 0.0249 0.0726 0.0974 6.8100e- 0.0668 0.0736 0.0000 156.4261 '156.4261 0.0402 0.0000 157.4312 11 003 003 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.93 0.00 1.32 6.86 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 2-1-2019 4-30-2019 0.3643 0.3643 2 5-1-2019 7-31-2019 0.3806 0.3806 3 8-1-2019 10-31-2019 0.3808 0.3808 4 11-1-2019 1-31-2020 0.3685 0.3685 5 2-1-2020 4-30-2020 0.0654 0.0654 Highest 0.3808 0.3808 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 5.0900e- 0.0000 4.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 9.1000e- - 9.1000e- 0.0000 0.0000 9.7000e- 003 004 i 004 004 004 i Energy 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 2.7369 2.7369 1.1000e- 3.000Oe- 2.7473 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 004 005 i Mobile 1.3200e- 5.8500e- 0.0178 6.000Oe- 5.5400e- 6.000Oe- 5.6000e- 1.4800e- 6.000Oe- 1.5400e- + 0.0000 5.8556 5.8556 2.5000e- 0.0000 5.8619 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 i 004 i______ _ Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.1015 0.0000 0.1015 6.000Oe- - 0.0000 0.2515 i 003 t______ Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _ + 0.0305 0.6064 0.6369 3.1500e- 8.000Oe 0.7392 i 003 005 i Total 6.4400e- 6.0900e- 0.0185 6.000Oe- 5.5400e- 8.000Oe- 5.6200e- 1.4800e- 8.000Oe- 1.5600e- 0.1320 9.1998 9.3317 9.5100e. 1.1000e- 9.6008 11 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 5.0900e- 0.0000 4.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 9.1000e- - 9.1000e- 0.0000 0.0000 9.7000e- 003 ; 004 004 004 004 ------4-------r------------- Energy 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- - 0.0000 - - 2.000Oe- 2.0000e- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.7369 - 2.7369 - 1.1000e- 3.000Oe- 2.7473 005 004 004 ; 005 005 005 005 004 005 - - - - - - - - - - - .1------- +------- +------- +------- +------- +------- +------- +------- +------------------ - - __ Mobile 1.1000e- - 4.35OOe- - 0.0122 - 4.000Oe- - 3.3600e- - 4.000Oe- - 3.4000e- - 9.000Oe- - 4.000Oe- 9.4000e- - 0.0000 3.6409 3.6409 1.7000e 0.0000 r 3.6451 .. 003 003 005 003 ; 005 003 004 005 ; 004 A 004 38.46 Waste 0.0000 0.)000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0508 0.0000 0.0508 3.000Oe- - 0.0000 0.1257 003 n-------+-------+-------+------- - - - - - - - ------+-------+- Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0244 0.5268 0.5511 2.52OOe- 6.000Oe- 0.6332 t 003 005 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Total 6.2200e- 4.5900e- 0.0128 4.000Oe- 3.3600e- 6.000Oe- 3.4200e- 9.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 9.6000e- 0.0751 6.9054 6.9806 5.8000e- 9.000Oe- 7.1523 11 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 003 005 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 3.42 24.63 30.59 33.33 39.35 25.00 39.15 39.19 25.00 38.46 43.08 24.94 25.20 39.01 18.18 25.50 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 28 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week I Num Days Phase Description 1 :Grading :Grading ;2/1/2019 '2/6/2019 ' 5' 2' ---- 2 :Building Construction :Building Construction -----------4------------' 2/7/2019 :1/31/2020 4--------T--- 5: 100; 3 :Paving :Paving 2/1/2020 :2/14/2020 5: 5: 2 4 "Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 2/15/2020 2/28/2020 5. 51 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.86 Acres of Paving: 0.83 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 812; Non -Residential Outdoor: 271; Striped Parking Area: 2,169 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Grading :Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 •------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Grading •Rubber Tired Dozers 1 •--------------------------------------------------------F------------------ Grading •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 •-------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Building Construction •Cranes 1 ---------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------ Building Construction •Forklifts 2 -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- Paving •Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Paving • Pavers 1 ----------------------------C---------------------------F---------------- - - - - - - - - Paving •Rollers 1 -F Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 ------------------------------———————————- Architectural Coating :Air Compressors Trips and VMT 8.00 81: 0.7 ------------- ------------1.00, 1.00,247: 0.4 ------------- ------------6.00- 6.00-97: 0.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F ---------------------------r - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4.00' 231: 0.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.00 - 89: 0.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8.00 - 97: 0.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - F---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6.00 - 9 0.5 ------------- ------------7.00- 7.00-130' 0.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7.00 , 80: 0.3 ------------- ------------7.00- 7.00-97' 0.3 -------------4-------------- ------------- 1 6.00, 78, CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip jHaulingTrip Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count I Number I Number Number Lei I Length I Length I Class Vehicle Class I Vehicle Class Grading 4 10.00, 0.001 C.00: -------------------------------F----------I-----------I----------I SO2 Fugitive Building Construction 51 15.00 6.00: C.00: ---------------=---------------1-------------------- ----------I Bio- CO2 Paving 71 18.00:' 0.001 I C.00, -------------------------------------------'----------T---------+ Architectural Coating 1 3.00: 0.00: C.00. 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site 14.701 6.90 20.00�LD_Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT ---- '--------- �---------- I----------�- 1--------------1-------- 14.701 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix :HHDT ---- '------------------- v---------- 14.701 6.90: 20.001LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix :HHDT ---- 4---------------------4------------------------------------ 14.70: ---------- - - - - - - - - - - 14.70' 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix HHDT ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 2.4200e- 0.0000 2.4200e- 9.3000e- 0.0000 9.3000e- ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 CO3 004 ; 004 1 '----------ei---------------- 4 ------- 4 ------- 4 ---------------- 4---------------4-------r-------i•--------- Off -Road 1.9100e- 0.0172 0.0154 2.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.07OOe- 1.0200e- 1.0200e- 0.0000 2.1041 2.1041 4.000Oe - 0.0000 T 2.1141 003 005 003 CO3 003 003 004 ; ' ' ' ' ' ' Total 1.9100e- 0.0172 0.0154 2.000Oe- 2.4200e- 1.0700e- 3.4900e- 9.3000e- 1.0200e- 1.9500e- 0.0000 2.1041 2.1041 4.0000e- 0.0000 2.1141 003 005 003 003 003 004 003 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Grading - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 1.9100e- 0.0172 0.0154 - 2.000Oe- - - 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0200e- 1.0200e- 0.0000 2.1040 2.1040 4.000Oe 0.0000 2.1141 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 ' i 1 1 ' Total Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0154 2.000Oe- Worker 8.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.8000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1963 0.1963 0.0000 0.0000 0.1964 005 005 004 004 ; 004 005 ; 005 3.6000e- 1.0200e- i 1 1 Total 8.0000e- 6.000Oe- 6.8000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1963 0.1963 0.0000 0.0000 0.1964 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.4000e- 0.0000 9.4000e- 3.6000e- 0.0000 3.6000e- + 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 ; 004 004 ; 004 Off -Road 1.9100e- 0.0172 0.0154 - 2.000Oe- - - 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0200e- 1.0200e- 0.0000 2.1040 2.1040 4.000Oe 0.0000 2.1141 003 005 003 003 003 003 004 ' i 1 1 ' Total 1.9100e- 0.0172 0.0154 2.000Oe- 9.4000e- 1.0700e- 2.0100e- 3.6000e- 1.0200e- 1.3800e- 0.0000 2.1040 2.1040 4.000Oe- 0.0000 2.1141 003 005 004 003 003 004 003 003 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Grading - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 .� i i ' • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' : _______1_______1_______1_ ' T -------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' ' ' . . . .� _ 1 1 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1490 i . i i i Worker 8.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.8000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1963 0.1963 0.0000 0.0000 0.1964 005 005 004 004 C04 005 005 i 0.0652M19.6916 i I , Total 8.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 6.8000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 0.0000 2.2000e- 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1963 0.1963 0.0000 0.0000 0.1964 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 3.3 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1120 1.1490 0.8826 1.3300e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0652 0.0652 1 0.0000 119.6916 - 119.6916 0.0379 0.0000 120.6383 003 ' ' 1 Total 0.1120 1.1490 0.8826 1.3300e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0652 0.0652M19.6916 119.6916 0.0379 0.0000 120.6383 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM 10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 , i 1 ' ' Total ., , 1.1490 Vendor 2.6800e- 0.0812 0.0221 1.7000e- 4.4200e- 5.4000e- 4.9600e- 1.2700e- 5.2000e- 1.7900e- } 0.0000 17.2070 17.2070 1.5000e- 0.0000 17.2445 003 004 003 004 003 003 ; 004 003 j ; 003 , • s , Worker 7.3300e- 5.3500e- 0.0594 1.9000e- 0.0193 1.3000e- 0.0194 5.1200e- 1.2000e- 5.2400e- 0.0000 17.2274 17.2274 4.2000e- 0.0000 17.2380 003 003 ; 004 ; 004 003 004 ; 003 j ; 004 ' ' ' s 1 Total 0.0100 0.0866 0.0815 3.6000e- 0.0237 6.7000e- 0.0244 6.3900e- 6.4000e- 7.0300e- 0.0000 34.4344 34.4344 1.9200e-4825 34.4825 004 004 003 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1120 1.1490 0.8826 1.3300e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0652 0.0652 0.0000 119.6914 119.6914 0.0379 0.0000 120.6381 003 , i 1 ' ' Total 0.1120 1.1490 0.8826 1.3300e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0652 0.0652 0.0000 119.6914 119.6914 0.0379 0.0000 120.6381 003 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Building Construction - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 , ., i Vendor 2.6800e- 0.0812 0.0221 1.7000e- 4.4200e- 5.4000e- 4.9600e- 1.2700e- 5.2000e- 1.7900e- + 0.0000 17.2070 17.2070 1.5000e- 0.0000 17.2445 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 ., 003 Worker 7.3300e- 5.3500e- 0.0594 1.9000e- 0.0193 1.3000e- 0.0194 5.1200e- 1.2000e- 5.2400e- _ 0.0000 17.2274 17.2274 4.2000e- 0.0000 17.2380 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 i 004 ; 5.5300e- 0.0000 ' Total 0.0100 0.0866 0.0815 3.6000e- 0.0237 6.7000e- 0.0244 6.3900e- 6.4000e- 7.0300e- 0.0000 34.4344 :34.4344 1.9200e- 0.0000 34.4825 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 3.3 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 9.9100e- 0.1018 0.0850 1.3000e- 6.0100e- 6.0100e- 5.5300e- 5.5300e- ! 0.0000 11.5070 11.5070 3.7200e- 0.0000 11.6000 003 004 003 CO3 003 003 003 ; , ' 1 ' Total 9.9100e- 0.1018 0.0850 1.3000e- 6.0100e- 6.0100e- 5.5300e- 5.5300e- 0.0000 11.5070 11.5070 3.7200e- 0.0000 11.6000 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 11 PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I 71 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 ; ; 004 003 ; 003 003 ; 003 i ; 003 1 , + , Vendor 2.2000e- 7.32OOe- 1.9900e- 2.000Oe- 4.3000e- 4.000Oe- 4.7000e- 1.3000e- 4.000Oe- 1.6000e- i 0.0000 1.6796 1.6796 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.6831 004 ; 003 ; 003 005 ; 004 005 ; 004 ; 004 005 004 004 ; ., , , , , _.._-____-.,,_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______r_______y-----._,_______ Worker 6.7000e- 4.7000e- - 5.35OOe- 2.000Oe- - 1.8900e- - 1.000Oe- 1.91OOe- - 5.000Oe- - 1.000Oe- 5.1000e- + ------- 4 ------- 4---------------- + 0.0000 1.6390 1.6390 - 4.000Oe- - 0.0000 1.6400 004 ; 004 003 005 003 005 ; 003 004 005 004 i ; 005 ' ' 1 ' Total 8.9000e- 7.7900e- 7.3400e- 4.000Oe- 2.3200e- 5.0000e- 2.3800e- 6.3000e- 5.000Oe- 6.7000e- 0.0000 3.3187 3.3187 1.8000e- 0.0000 3.3231 003 004 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Bio- CO2 N137 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 11 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 71 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •- 9.9100e- 0.1018 0.0850 1.3000e- 6.0100e- 6.01OOe- 5.53OOe- 5.5300e- + 0.0000 11.5069 11.5069 3.72OOe- 0.0000 11.6000 003 ; ; 004 003 ; 003 003 ; 003 i ; 003 1 ' 0.1018 0.0850 1.3000e- 6.0100e- 6.0100e- 5.5300e- 5.5300e- 0.0000 11.5069 11.5069 3.7200e- 0.0000 11.6000 �tal9.9100e- 11 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----------------- i Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i ' i Vendor 2.2000e- 7.3200e- 1.9900e- 2.000Oe- 4.3000e- 4.000Oe- 4.7000e- 1.3000e- 4.000Oe- 1.6000e- i 0.0000 1.6796 1.6796 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.6831 004 003 003 005 004 005 C04 004 005 004 i 004 i i i Worker 6.7000e- 4.7000e- 5.3500e- 2.000Oe- 1.8900e- 1.000Oe- 1.9100e- - 5.000Oe- - 1.000Oe- 5.1000e- + 0.0000 1.6390 1.6390 - 4.000Oe- - 0.0000 1.6400 004 004 003 005 003 005 CO3 004 005 004 i 005 ; 4.6965 4.6965 Total 8.9000e- 7.7900e- 7.3400e- 4.000Oe- 2.3200e- 5.000Oe- 2.3800e- 6.3000e- 5.000Oe- 6.7000e- 0.0000 3.3187 3.3187 1.8000e- 0.0000 3.3231 004 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 3.4 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 3.8600e- 0.0361 0.0356 6.000Oe- 1.9800e- 1.9800e- 1.8300e- 1.8300e- + 0.0000 4.6965 4.6965 1.3700e- 0.0000 4.7307 003 005 003 CO3 003 ; 003 a 003 ; ----------------- i Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i ' Total 3.8600e- 0.0361 0.0356 6.000Oe- 1.9800e- 1.9800e. 1.8300e- 1.8300e- 0.0000 4.6965 4.6965 1.3700e- 0.0000 4.7307 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Paving - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -----------------------------------------------------------------------*-- T Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. �_ . : _ Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0361 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. Worker 3.5000e- 2.5000e- 2.7900e- 1.000Oe- 9.9000e- 1.000Oe- 9.9000e- 2.6000e- 1.000Oe- 2.7000e- + 0.0000 0.8551 0.8551 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.8556 004 ; 004 003 ; 005 ; 004 005 ; 004 004 ; 005 004 i ; 005 ; ' : i ' Total 3.5000e- 2.5000e- 2.7900e- 1.000Oe- 9.9000e- 1.000Oe- 9.9000e- 2.6000e- 1.000Oe- 2.7000e- 0.0000 0.8551 0.8551 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.8556 003 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 3.8600e- 0.0361 0.0356 6.000Oe- 1.98OOe- 1.9800e- 1.8300e- 1.8300e- } 0.0000 4.6965 4.6965 1.3700e- 0.0000 4.7307 003 ; 005 ; 003 003 ; 003 003 003 -----------------------------------------------------------------------*-- T Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i : Total 3.8600e- 0.0361 0.0356 6.000Oe- 1.9800e- 1.9800e- 1.8300e- 1.8300e- 0.0000 4.6965 4.6965 1.3700e- 0.0000 4.7307 003 005 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Paving - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 1.2100e- 8.4200e- 9.1600e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.2791 003 003 003 005 004 C04 004 004 004 1 ' ' 1 ' Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.4200e- i Worker 3.5000e- 2.5000e- 2.7900e- 1.000Oe- 9.9000e- 1.000Oe- 9.9000e- 2.6000e- 1.000Oe- 2.7000e- ! 0.0000 0.8551 0.8551 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.8556 004 004 003 005 ; 004 005 C04 004 005 004 i 005 ; ' Total 3.5000e- 2.5000e- 2.7900e- 1.000Oe- 9.9000e- 1.000Oe- 9.9000e- 2.6000e- 1.000Oe- 2.7000e- 0.0000 0.8551 0.8551 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.8556 004 004 003 005 004 005 C04 004 005 004 005 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0151 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Off -Road 1.2100e- 8.4200e- 9.1600e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.2791 003 003 003 005 004 C04 004 004 004 1 ' ' 1 ' Total 0.0163 8.4200e- 9.1600e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2791 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 --------------------------------- ------------------- r ------• ~ • Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 s 004 Worker 6.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.6000e- 0.0000 1.6000e- 0.0000 1.7000e- 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1425 0.1425 0.0000 0.0000 0.1426 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 y ' ' Total 6.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 4.6000e- 0.0000 1.6000e- 0.0000 1.7000e- 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1425 0.1425 0.0000 0.0000 0.1426 005 005 004 004 004 004 005 004 005 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0151 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 1.2100e- 8.4200e- 9.1600e- 1.000Oe- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- + 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2791 003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 s 004 s Total 0.0163 8.4200e- 9.1600e- 1.000Oe- 5.S000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 5.5000e- 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2791 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust Ph110 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Vendor •' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Worker •' 6.00OOe- 4.00OOe- ' 4.6000e- ' 0.0000 1.6000e- ' 0.0000 1.7000e- ' 4.00OOe- 0.0000 4.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1425 0.1425 0.0000 0.0000 0.1426 005 005 ; 004 ; 004 004 005 005 i s Total 6.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 4.6000e- 0.0000 1.6000e- 0.0000 1.7000e- 4.00OOe- 0.0000 4.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1425 0.1425 0.0000 0.0000 0.1426 005 005 004 004 004 005 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Improve Destination Accessibility Increase Transit Accessibility CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG I NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 I Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 I NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category 1.33 0.57 14,605 tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 1.1000e- 4.3500e- 0.0122 4.00OOe- 3.3600e- 4.00OOe- 3.4000e- 9.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 9.4000e- i 0.0000 3.6409 3.6409 1.700Oe- 0.0000 3.6451 003 003 ; 005 -_ ; 003 005 ; 003 004 ; 005 004 s 004 Unmitigated 1.3200e -T 5.8500e -T 0.0178 T 6.00OOe--r 5.5400e -T 6.00OOe- 5.6000e -T 1.4800e -Y 6.00OOe-T 1.5400e- 0.0000 _ _ r 5.8556 T 5.8556 -r 2.5000e --r 0.0000 5.8619 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Diverted Pass -by Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Office Building ...................................... --------------F----------- Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 5.97 1.33 i 0.57 ---- --------------------- 0.00 0.00 t 0.00 14,605 8,850 Total 5.97 1.33 0.57 14,605 8,850 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS MH General Office Building 0.555968 • 0.0438481 0.210359 i 0.1163781 0.0167651 0.0057951 0.025008 i 0.016160 i 0.001677 i 0.001586 i 0.004867 i 0.000586 i 0.001002 --+----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------4--------4--------4--------+-------4 - - - - - - - Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces • 0.555968 • 0.043848 : 0.210359 , 0.116378 , 0.016765 , 0.005795 , 0.025008* 0.016160 , 0.001677- 0.001586 , 0.004867- 0.000586 , 0.001002 Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 • ... --------------------- --------Y--------- -------- -------- Other•Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 ------- ---------------- 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS MH General Office Building 0.555968 • 0.0438481 0.210359 i 0.1163781 0.0167651 0.0057951 0.025008 i 0.016160 i 0.001677 i 0.001586 i 0.004867 i 0.000586 i 0.001002 --+----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------4--------4--------4--------+-------4 - - - - - - - Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces • 0.555968 • 0.043848 : 0.210359 , 0.116378 , 0.016765 , 0.005795 , 0.025008* 0.016160 , 0.001677- 0.001586 , 0.004867- 0.000586 , 0.001002 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive Exhaust P(\410 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total Category I tons/yr Bio- CO2 I NBio- CO21 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I CO2e MT/yr Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 2.4719 2.4719 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.4807 Mitigated I 004 005 Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 2.4719 2.4719 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.4807 Unmitigated i 004 005 ----------- NaturalGas - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------T-------+--------------- 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2650 --------i------- 0.2650 --- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 - 0.2666 Mitigated 005 004 004 005 005 005 i 005 i 005 .. ; NaturalGas 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2650 0.2650 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2666 Unmitigated 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr General Office 4966.38 + 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- + 0.0000 - 0.2650 0.2650 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2666 Building ; +; 005 004 004 ; 005 005 005 005 ± ; ; ; 005 ; ,_ ,_ ,_ i _ ,______ , Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces , i, ; ; ' ' 1 1 , ' Total 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2650 0.2650 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2666 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr General Office 4966.38 i; 3.000Oe- 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 0.2650 0.2650 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2666 Building ; i. 005 004 004 ; 005 005 , 005 005 005 , , , , Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; y; ; ; ' 7 1 1 ' Total 3.00 2.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2650 0.2650 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2666 5 005 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr General Office 7757.94 + 2.4719 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.4807 Building +; 004 ; 005 +, Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; +, Total 2.4719 1.000Oe- 2.0000e- 2.4807 004 005 Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr General Office 7757.94 + 2.4719 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 2.4807 Building y; 004 005 +, Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; +, Total 2.4719 1.000Oe- 2.0000e- 2.4807 004 005 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tonslyr PM10 PM10 MT/yr PM2.5 Mitigated 5.0900e- 0.0000 4.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 % 0.0000 9.1000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 0.0000 9.7000e- 003 ' 004 ' ' MT/yr ' ' 004 ' 004 ; 004 - - - - - - - - - --------T-------r------T------Y------T------T------T------T------T------- � ..------T------Y------T------� Unmitigated 5.0900e- 0.0000 4.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 0.0000 9.7000e- 003 004 Products 003 Landscaping 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 9.1000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 0.0000 9.7000e- 004 004 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total1 SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 7.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 004 Consumer 4.2900e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 Products 003 Landscaping 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 9.1000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 0.0000 9.7000e- 005 004 : 004 004 004 : Total 5.0800e- 0.0000 4.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 0.0000 9.7000e- 003 004 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •• 7.5000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 S 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 004 y Consumer 4.2900e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products 003 Landscaping 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 } 0.0000 9.1000e- 9.1000e 0.0000 0.0000 9.7000e- 005 004 3 004 004 004 ' 1 Total 5.0800e- 0.0000 4.7000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 0.0000 9.7000e- 003 004 004 004 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Apply Water Conservation Strategy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 24 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 0.5511 2.5200e- ' 6.000Oe- ' 0.6332 003 005 Unmitigated M 0.6369 -r 3.1500e -Y 8.000Oe-? 0.7392 Mgal 003 005 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Office '3.0959762• 0.6369 i 3.1500e- i 8.000Oe- i 0.7392 Building / i 003 005 '0.058 8241 •' -- - - - - - - - - - I. -----41-------{------- - - - - - - - ------ - Other Non- 0/0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; +, ' Total 0.6369 3.1500e- 8.000Oe- 0.7392 003 005 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 25 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services Indoor/OutTotal CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Office -3.076781 /+ 0.5511 2.5200e- 6.000Oe- 0.6332 Building ;0.0588241 i; 003 005 +, Other Non- 0/0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; +, Total 0.5511 2.5200e- 6.000Oe- 0.6332 003 005 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 26 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual CategoryNear 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 0.0508 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1257 003 ; ; _ _ _ Unmitigated m 0.1015 T 6.000Oe-Y 0.0000 0.2515 003 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr General Office 0.5 + 0.1015 6.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2515 Building +; 003 Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Total 0.1015 6.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2515 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 27 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators L- Equipment Type ' Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I Land Use tons MT/yr General Office 0.25 + 0.0508 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1257 Building +; 003 +, ; Other Non- 0 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; +, Total 0.0508 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1257 003 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators L- Equipment Type ' Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 28 of 28 Date: 1/30/2017 3:54 PM 6819 Lions Park - Phase 2 - Orange County, Annual LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations 0 Scorecard - Donald Dungan Library 11130116 ++ ? .. Certified 40 to 49 points ;river 50 to 59 points Loki 60 to 79 points Platmurn 80 to 110 t_3 22� 3 Y .c Pereq 1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention 12 ' c credit a Recycled Content 1 to 2 1 � d creed 1 Site Selection 1 _ y { 2� c credits Regional Materials 1 to 2 d credal Development Density and Community Connectivity 5 c Credit Rapidly Renewable Materials 1 1 d Credit Brownfield Redevelopment 1 i 1 c credit? Certified Wood 1 d Credit4.1 Alternative Transportation—Public Transportation Access 6 d Credit a2 Alternative Transportation—Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms Alternative2, 1 1_3., —-r1,, ^ ••�. - ^ d Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation—Low-Emitting,Fu4Efficient Vehicles 3 . ++ 7 •• 2•� d credit44 Akernative Transportation—Parking Capacity 2 Y d Prereq t Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance !. 1 ? c Credit5.1 Site Development—Protect or Restore Habitat 1 Y If Prereq 2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control 1 1 d credit 5.2 Site Development—Maximize Open Space 1 1- I r d credit 1 Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring 1 1 d Credit 6.1 Stormwater Design—Quantity Control 1 1 ' d credit 2 Increased Ventilation 1 d credit 6.2 Stormwater Design—Quality Control 1 1 c credit 3.1 Construction IAQ Management Plan—During Construction 1 C credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect—Non-roof 1 . _1: . c credit 3.2 Construction IAQ Management Plan—Before Occupancy 1 ,. d Credit 72 Heat Island Effect—Roof 1 I—.-7.. 1, c credit 4.1 Low -Emitting Materials—Adhesives and Sealants 1 1 1 d Credit a Light Pollution Reduction 1 1., ti e credit 4 2 Low -Emitting Matenals—Paints and Coatings i 1 c Credit 43 Low -Emitting Matenals—Flooring Systems 1 s 4 J 2-M '..::,,,.: • ,. ,.: + 1 c credit 4.4 Low -Emitting Materials—Composite Wood and Agrifiber Products 1 ++ ? .. d credit 5 Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control 1 Y d Prereq t Water Use Reduction -20% Reduction Jt..� d creda6l Controllability of Systems—Lighting 1 2. d Credd 1 Water Efficient Landscaping 2 to 4 1 1 j d credit 6.z Controllability of Systems—Thermal Comfort 1 d Creddz Innovative Wastewater Technologies 2 d CreEa7.1 Thermal Comfort—Design 1 ' 4 - d credit 3 Water Use Reduction 2 to 4 1. d credit zz Thermal Comfort—Verification 1 " 1 d credna.1 Daylight and Views—Daylight 1 i3 11� 1 d credit 8.2 Daylight and Views—Views 1 Y c Prereq 1 Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systems 5 I 1 -Ili Do- ". Pas" ^ Y If Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance ++ ? •• Y d Pereq 3 Fundamental Refrigerant Management 1 credit 1.1 Innovation in Design: Green Education 1 _ Alt J_ 6-= d credits Optimize Energy performance1 to 19 _. 1 i. credit 1.2 Innovation in Design: Green Cleaning 1 7 ". d Credit On -Site Renewable Energy 1 to 7 1 Credit 1.3 Innovation in Design: MRc2 Construction Waste 95% 1 c Credit 3 Enhanced Comm ssioning 2 1 credit IA Innovation in Design: MRc4 Recycled Content 30% 1 7 � d Credito Enhanced Refrigerant Management 2 1 j credit 1,5 Innovation in Design: MRc6 Certified Wood 95% 1 3 c credd5 Measurement and Verification 3 1 i Credit LEED Accredited Professional 1 2 c Creda6 Green Power 2 _2.•:1...2 =11 0. ,: •..:.: ^.. credit 1.1 Regional Priority: SSe5.2 1 Y d Prereq 1 Storage and Collection of Recyclables 1 Credit 1,2 Regional Priority: WEc2, 2 points 1 CC.'a Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof 1 to 3 Credit 1 3 Regional Priority: WEc3, 40% 1 c credit t.2 Building Reuse—Maintain 50% of Intenor Non -Structural Elements 1 1 credit 1.4 Regional Priority: IEQc8.1, 1 point 1 _ '2 i s credit 2 Construction Waste Management 1 to 2 c credit 3 Materials Reuse 1 to 2 24 • ^.. -" ' •- + LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations 0 Scorecard - Donald Dungan New Community Center 11/30116 35 ++ 7 .. Certified 40 to 4S points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 80 to 79 points Platinum 89 to 110 5� d Prereq t Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance d Prereq 2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control ++ 7 Recycled Content 1 to 2 'r. 1 j I c Credits Regional Materials 1 to 2 c Prereq 1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Certified Wood 1 { ! d credit 1 Site Selection 1 �j d Credit Development Density and Community Connectivity 5 11 f d Credit Brownfield Redevelopment 1 d Credit 4.1 Alternative Transportation—Public Transportation Access 6 d Credit 4.2 Alternative Transportation—Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms 1 { d Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation—Low-Emitting,Fuel-Efficient Vehicles 3 d `i Crediton Alternative Transportation—Parking Capacity 2 Y" 1 c Credit 5.1 Site Development—Protect or Restore Habitat 1 1 d Credit5.2 Site Development—Maximize Open Space 1 j d credit 6.1 Stormwater Design—Quantity Control 1 d x } Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design—Quality Control 1 i 1 c Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect—Non-roof 1 d Crede 7.2 Heat Island Effect—Roof 1 1 i d Credit 6 Light Pollution Reduction 1 2 Y I d Prereq 1 Water Use Reduction -20 % Reduction d Credit 1 Water Efficient Landscaping 2 to 4 d Credit Innovative Wastewater Technologies 2 d Credit Water Use Reduction 2 to 4 17 Y c Prereq 1 Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systems it Y d Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance d Prereq 3 Fundamental Refrigerant Management �Y, 3_ d Credit 1 Optimize Energy Performance 1 to 19 7 1 I d 4- Credit2 On -Site Renewable Energy 1 to 7 C _r Credit 3 Enhanced Commissioning 2 2 d Credito Enhanced Refrigerant Management 2 i 3 ' c Credits Measurement andVer�cation 3 c Credit Green Power 2 :. 510 1117=1771• . Y d Prereq 1 Storage and Collection of Recyclables 1 i c Credd 1.1 Building Reuse—Maintain Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof 1 to 3 c Credit t2 Building Reuse—Maintain 50% of Interior Non -Structural Elements 1 c Credit 2 Construction Waste Management 1 to 2 - c Credit Materials Reuse 1to2 IN 1 Y ^ d Prereq t Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance d Prereq 2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control i 1{ c Credito Recycled Content 1 to 2 'r. 1 j I c Credits Regional Materials 1 to 2 1 c Credits Rapidly Renewable Materials 1 i c Credit)' Certified Wood 1 Y ^ d Prereq t Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance d Prereq 2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control d Credit t Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring d Credit Increased Ventilation C Credd 3.1 Construction IAQ Management Plan—During Construction ,E c Credit 3.2 Construction IAQ Management Plan—Before Occupancy 1 c Cres w.1 Low -Emitting Matenals—Adhesives and Sealants C Credit 4.2 Low -Emitting Materials—Paints and Coatings I c Credit 4.3 Low -Emitting Materials—Flooring Systems .i c Credd4.4 Low -Emitting Materials --Composite Wood and Agrifiber Products I d Credit 5 Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control d Credit 6.1 Controllability of Systems—Lighfing 1 d Credit 6.2 Controllability of Systems—ThermalComfort d Credit t Thermal Comfort—Design d Credit 7.2 Thermal Comfort—Verification { 1 ! d Credit 8.1 Daylight and Views—Daylight 1 d Credit 8.2 Daylight and Views—Dews Credit Ll Regional Priority: MRc1.1 + Credit 1z Regional Priority: WEc2, 2 points I Credit 1.3 Regional Priority: WEc3 40 I r 1 CmdR1.4 Regional Priority: IEQc8.1, 1 point Pygaxt total Possible Paints: 11114 1 Credit tit Innovation in Design: Green Education Credit 1.2 Innovation in Design: Green Cleaning Credit 13 Innovation in Design: MRc2 Construction Waste 95 1 Credit in Innovation in Design: MRc4 Recycled Content 30 1 Credit 1.5 Innovation in Design: MRc6 Certified Wood 95 Credit LEED Accredited Professional Credit Ll Regional Priority: MRc1.1 + Credit 1z Regional Priority: WEc2, 2 points I Credit 1.3 Regional Priority: WEc3 40 I r 1 CmdR1.4 Regional Priority: IEQc8.1, 1 point Pygaxt total Possible Paints: 11114 1 @JK KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. OVER 40 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE • Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects APPENDIX B Hydrology Study 700 South Flower Street, Suite 2,100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.418.0201 kpff com Hydrology Study The Lions Park Project 1855 Park Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92627 OFF Job # 1500059 January 2016 Prepared for: Johnson Favaro 5898 Blackwelder Street Culver City, CA 90232 (310) 559-5720 gnu Prepared by: KPFF Consulting Engineers 700 South Flower Street, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213)418-0201 700 South Flower Street, Suite 2700 Los Angeles, CA 90077 213,478,0201 koff.corn Table of Contents I. Purpose & Project Description..................................................................... II. Existing Drainage Conditions....................................................................... III. Proposed Drainage Conditions.................................................................. IV. Design Criteria............................................................................................ a Peak Flow Analysis lzpff .............................................. 3 .............................................. 3 .............................................. 3 .............................................. 4 .................................................................................................I.............................. 4 VI. Summary and Conclusion........................................................................................................................4 Appendix A— Figures and Exhibits Figure 11.1— Existing Conditions Figure 111.1— Proposed Hydrology Map Appendix B — Rational Method Analysis Appendices References Orange County Hydrology Manual, Orange County Environmental Management Agency October 1986 700 South Flower Street, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.418.0201 kpff.com IT fl I. Purpose & Project Description The purpose of this study is to analyze the existing drainage characteristics of the proposed project site and compare and contrast them with the impact of the proposed improvements. The hydraulic characteristics of the proposed drainage system will also be analyzed to ensure the site infrastructure will have the capacity to meet the stormwater demand generated by the project for the 10 -year design storm. The project has been planned to span two different phases. Each phase designed and permitted independently of the other. Phase 1 improvements include the bulk of demolition and construction while phase 2 improvements consist solely of resurfacing the exiting parking lot due to expected damage during construction of phase 1 improvements. The site is located at 1855 Park Avenue in the city of Costa Mesa. It is currently occupied by a public library, a community center, and a park. The area to be developed is approximately 3.57 acres in size, on an overall site of approximately 10 acres. The proposed improvements include the demolition of the exiting library, the repurposing of the community center, and the construction of a new library and green on the south east portion of the site. Additional improvements include the construction of a parking lot adjacent to the historical society building on the northwest corner of the site. II. Existing Drainage Conditions Existing site drainage can be generally described as flowing from the south east to north west. There exists a system of area drains and catch basins throughout the site capturing runoff and discharging to the public system at Anaheim Avenue, the eastern border of this site. From this point, stormwater is directed towards a large infiltrations system treating public runoff from a large upstream tributary area that flows through Anaheim Avenue. This stormwater is infiltrated by a Contech system and any overflow is released to continue along Anaheim Avenue to its ultimate discharge point at the coast. Refer to Figure 11.1— Existing Conditions for existing conditions. Existing site grades are generally flat, not exceeding 2% throughout. The site high point at the south east corner is at an elevation of approximately 96' while the low point is at the north west corner at approximately 86.5'. This 9.5' grade difference occurs over approximately 900', resulting in a very mild overall slope over the general direction of flow. The bulk of storm water conveyance occurs through surface flow in gutters located throughout the site parking. In landscaped areas where runoff is not expected to reach the paved parking lots, water is captured at area drains and catch basins and conveyed underground to the public right of way. III. Proposed Drainage Conditions The proposed site drainage design aims to maintain the overall drainage characteristics of the existing site. Elevations ranges and overall flow path length will remain similar to the existing conditions. Major design changes include the addition of a shallow infiltration system located below the surface of the proposed parking lot adjacent to the historical society building. The system is designed to treat and infiltrate a W design storm based on the criteria set by the city's WQMP guidelines. Finished conditions will establish a new highpoint at 97.55' for the proposed library to the south and will maintain the existing low point of 86.5' at the northwest, maintaining the moderate overall slope of the existing conditions. 700 South Flower Street Suite 2100 Los Angeles CA 90017 213.418.0201 koff com 1 It ffl To better describe the proposed site drainage several subareas were designated for the proposed site plan. These subareas represent the major drainage areas of the site, each having distinct discharge points which ultimately converge before discharging to the infiltration system and overflowing to the public system. These areas encompass the entirety of the proposed development and are limited to the scope of work proposed.. See Figure 111.1— Proposed Hydrology Map for detailed hydrologic conditions. Finally, the proposed drainage system consists of area drains to capture runoff from the on -grade parking lots, underground storm drain piping, roof drains to convey stormwater runoff over building footprints, an infiltration system designed to infiltrate the W storm, and an overflow connection to the public right of way. The proposed storm drain lines were sized to accommodate the 25 -Year Design storm and to prevent flooding of structures for the 100 -year Sturiii. The design ifitenl IS to Covey Captured Water t0 the infiltration system throughout the year and to allow generated runoff to infiltrate into native soils. In the event of more significant storm events, such as the 25 -year design storm, the intent is to capture the entirety of the storm within the underground conveyance system and allow the infiltration system to fill to capacity and overflow onto Anaheim Avenue. IV. Design Criteria This study meets the required design criteria set forth by the Orange County Hydrology Manual. Per design specifications, the drainage system for this site has been designed to meet the flood protection level set by the hydrology manual. This level of protection ensures that proposed site grading and drainage in addition to storm drain systems can accommodate a 25 -year frequency design storm falling on a saturated watershed and protect habitable structures from flooding in the event of a 100 -year storm. Street flow restrictions are not applicable to this development and will not be considered or analyzed. a. Peak Flow Analysis Peak flow analysis for this study was calculated using the Rational Method as specified in the Orange County Hydrology Manual. Using this method the site specific peak flow rates for a 25 -year design storm were calculated for post design conditions. For a detailed breakdown of peak flows per subarea see Appendicex A — Rational Method Hydrology Analysis. VI. Summary and Conclusion The analysis provided in this study has shown that the proposed drainage system for this project will be able to accommodate the 25 -year design storm as set forth by the guidelines in the Orange County Hydrology Manual. During a 25 -year storm event runoff will be captured at inlets, area drains and catch basins, conveyed through underground piping to the proposed infiltration system, and will overflow when necessary to the public right of way at Anaheim Avenue. 700 South Flower Street, Suile 2100 Los Angeles. CA 90017 213.478.0201 kpff_com Appendix A Figures and Exhibits gnu I I I- I I I I I •. PLAN_ . lrpff THE LIONSPARKS PROJECT POST -CONSTRUCTION HYDROLOGY MAP EX1.01 700 South Rower Street, Suite 2700 Los Angeles. CA 90077 273.418.0201 kpff.com IT fl Appendix 6 Rational Method Analysis 7 6 100 5 4 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY MANUAL on Vill " Um 60- Single Family -5,000 ft 2 Lot 40 - Single Family -1 /4 Acre Lot 20- Single Family - I Acre Lot 15 - Developed Open Space 10 - Single Family -2 1/2 Acre Lot EXAMPLE: ( I ) L= 550, H=5.0', K=Single Family (5-7 DU/Ac) Development, Tc=12.6 min. (2) L= 550', H= 5.0', K= Commercial Development, Tc=9.7 min. 35 40 a 0 r- c m Ea 0 0 5 Z' 0 U- L- 0 _ 0 D-4 Figure D -I Tc' LIMITATIONS: L 100 1. Maximum length = 1000 Feet TC 1000 90 2. Maximum area = 10 Acres 5 (min) 900 80 a 70 H u 6 800 -- 500 Y� 3 400 60 at .2 _ b300 700 c ><-a 200 7 E 0 N app E 2.5 600 c 50 0 c „ 80 60 8 > F c o a30 1 2 h 2 `c 0 20 9 500 _Z (t) 0 m m 35 m o e c a m 10 e 10 400 N 30 K 1 .0 (1) 3 II c ,� Undeveloped 0 - Good Cover m 2 12 a 350 25 Undeveloped c 180 13 v E Fair Cover 0 o E _ .6 4 �14 300 Undeveloped 1 .�2 15 c - Poor Cover °00 22 190 16 c =� 18 Single Family v is 17- - 250 17 (5-7 DU/AC) 65 z� 18 —15 16 Commercia M9 19 _ (Paved) 20 COW 200 o 14 13 0 m KEY L -H -Tc -K -Tc' aci J °u 12 II / � 25- 50 0&;'10 10 Pi Development 150 w E E g 80- Apartment r 75 - Mobile Home 30- 8 65- C d 7 6 100 5 4 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY MANUAL on Vill " Um 60- Single Family -5,000 ft 2 Lot 40 - Single Family -1 /4 Acre Lot 20- Single Family - I Acre Lot 15 - Developed Open Space 10 - Single Family -2 1/2 Acre Lot EXAMPLE: ( I ) L= 550, H=5.0', K=Single Family (5-7 DU/Ac) Development, Tc=12.6 min. (2) L= 550', H= 5.0', K= Commercial Development, Tc=9.7 min. 35 40 a 0 r- c m Ea 0 0 5 Z' 0 U- L- 0 _ 0 D-4 Figure D -I Rational Method Studv Form Orange County Hydrology Manual Stud Name: The Lions Park Project Y 1 25 -Year Storm Rational Method Calculated Date: 1/26/2017 by: GT Checked Date: Page: 1 of: 2 Concentration Point Area (acres) Soil Type Dev. Type Tt (min.) Tc (min.) I (in/hr) Fm (in/hr) Fm (avg) Q (total) Flow Path Length (ft) Slope (ft/ft) v (ft/sec) Hydraulics and Notes Subarea Total 1 0.21 0.21 D Comm. 7.40 3.86 0.09 0.09 0.70 200 0.0226 Initial Subarea 4.00 150 0.2400 3 0.34 0.55 D Comm. 11.40 3.03 0.15 0.12 1.43 10.80 375 0.0148 4 1.44 1.99 D Comm. 22.20 2.07 0.07 0.10 3.54 Stream Summary 4 1.99 22.20 3.54 150 0.0012 Initial Subarea 2 0.26 0.26 D Comm. 8.50 3.57 0.20 0.20 0.79 10.80 375 0.0148 4 1.44 1.70 D Comm. 19.30 2.25 0.07 0.14 3.22 Stream Summary 4 1.70 19.30 3.22 Confluence Results #4 Qp 7.06 Ap 3.69 Tp 19.3 Orange County Hydrology Manual Stud Name: The Lions Park Project Study 25-Year Storm Rational Method Calculated by: GT Date: 1/26/2017 Checked Date: Page: 2 of: 2 Concentration Point Area (acres) Soil Type Dev. Type TtTc (min.) (min.) I (in/hr) Fm (in/hr) Fm (avg) Q (total) Flow Path Length (ft) Slope (ft/ft) V (ft/sec) Hydraulics and Notes Subarea Total 5 0.41 0.41 D Comm. 8.30 3.62 0.11 0.11 1.30 240 0.0129 6.20 175 0.0101 7 0.16 0.58 D Comm. 14.50 2.64 0.18 0.14 1.27 Stream Summary 7 0.58 14.50 1.27 133 0.0060 6 0.12 0.12 D Comm. 7.60 3.81 0.11 0.11 0.41 6.20 175 0.0101 7 0.16 0.29 D Comm. 13.80 2.72 0.18 0.14 0.66 Stream Summary 7 0.29 13.80 0.66 6.20 175 0.0101 7 0.16 3.85 D Comm. 25.50 1.92 0.18 0.18 6.03 7 3.85 25.50 6.03 Confluence Qp 10.44 Tp 25.50 Ap 5.15 25.50 140 0.0011 8 0.33 5.48 D Comm. 34.30 1.62 0.16 0.16 7.21 8 Stream Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Lions Park Projects APPENDIX C Water Quality Management Plan WQ XX-XXXX County of Orange/Santa Ana Region Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Project Name: Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion 570 W 18TH STREET, COSTA MESA, CA 92627 Prepared for: The City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 754-5000 Prepared by: KPFF Consulting Engineers 700 South Flower Street, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 418-0201 December 14, 2016 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Project Owner's Certification Planning Application No. (If applicable) 17 1 Grading Permit No. Tract/Parcel Map and Lot(s) Building Permit No. No. Address of Project Site and APN (If no address, specify Tract/Parcel Map and Lot Numbers) This Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for The City of Costa Mesa by KPFF Consulting Engineers. The WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the County of Orange NPDES Stormwater Program requiring the preparation of the plan. The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan , including the ongoing operation and maintenance of all best management practices (BMPs), and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent with the current Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the intent of the non -point source NPDES Permit for Waste Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District and the incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors - in -interest shall bear the aforementioned responsibility to implement and amend the WQMP. An appropriate number of approved and signed copies of this document shall be available on the subject site in perpetuity. Owner: The City of Costa Mesa Title Company City of Costa Mesa Address 77 Fair Drive Email Telephone # (714) 754-5000 I understand my responsibility to implement the provisions of this WQMP including the ongoing operation and maintenance of the best management practices (BMPs) described herein. Owner Signature Date THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Owner's Certification North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page i Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Preparer (Engineer): Title Thomas Gsell PE Registration # C34734 T Company KPFF Consulting Engineers Address 700 South Flower Street, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Email thomas.gsell@kpff.com Telephone # 213-266-5216 1 hereby certify that this Water Quality Management Plan is in compliance with, and meets the requirements set forth in, Order No. R8-2009-0030/NPDES No. CAS618030, of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Preparer Date Signature Place Stamp Here THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Owner's Certification North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page ii Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Contents Page No. Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance..................................1 SectionII Project Description......................................................................................................3 SectionIII Site Description...........................................................................................................8 Section IV Best Management Practices(BMPs)...........................................................................10 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs......................................................24 Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan)..............................................................................................25 Section VII Educational Materials................................................................................................26 Attachments AttachmentA................................................................................................................. Receiving Waters AttachmentB..............................................................................................................................303d List AttachmentC..........................................................................................................................Water Maps Attachment D............................................................................................................ Educational Material AttachmentE.......................................................................................................................... Calculations AttachmentF.............................................................................................................. Contech Worksheet THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Table of Contents North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page iii Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance Provide discretionary or grading/building permit information and water quality conditions of approval, or permit issuance, applied to the project. If conditions are unknown, please request applicable conditions from staff. Refer to Section 2.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) available on the OC Planning website (ocplanning.net). Permit/Application No. (If applicable) Address of Project Site (or Tract Map and Lot Number if no address) and APN Project Infomation Grading or Building Permit No. (If applicable) 1855 Park Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance N/A applied to this project. (Please list verbatim.) Conceptual WQMP Was a Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan I No previously approved for this project? THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section I North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 1 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Watershed -Based Plan Conditions Provide applicable conditions from watershed - based plans N/A including WIHMPs and TMDLS. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section I North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 2 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Section II Project Description 11.1 Project Description Provide a detailed project description including: • Project areas; • Land uses; • Land cover; • Design elements; • A general description not broken down by drainage management areas (DMAs). Include attributes relevant to determining applicable source controls. Refer to Section 2.2 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for information that must be included in the project description. Description of Proposed Project Development Category (From Redevelopment Project Model WQMP, Table 7.11-2; or -3): .................................................. ............................................................................................................................... Project Area (ft2): 155,339 c Number of Dwelling Units: 1 c SIC Code: 8231 ........................................................................................................................... . Pervious Impervious .............................. Y............................5• ............................... Y............................. Project Area Area Area Percentage Percentage (acres or sq ft) (acres or sq ft) ................................................................................................................t.................................¢............................. Pre -Project Conditions 57,195 0.368 98,144 0.632 ..............................................................%..................................... .... .............. Post -Project Conditions 77 388 0.498 77,951 0.502 ...................................................:................................:...............................................................:.............................. c The proposed drainage includes nine different drainage areas separated into 2 phases. Phase 1 includes drainage area DA1-DA9 THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section II North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 3 The proposed drainage patterns include a combination of two systems; local Drainage '- biofiltration with collection and an underground infiltration system. Along the Patterns/Connections proposed building runoff from the roof will be collected via roof drains and c connected into an 18" storm drain pipe that will transfer the runoff into an e underground infiltration system. Along the building there are biofiltration fi areas that will collect local stormwater into a perforated pipe and divert the c flow into the main 18" storm drain pipe running through the middle of the ..................................................:........................................................................................................................... THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section II North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 3 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion ............................................................................................................................... e site. Stormwater that does not fall on the roof or into the biofiltration areas c will be collected via area drain and transferred into the main 18" storm drain pipe running through the middle of the property and eventually collected in the underground infiltration system.ocal biofiltration with collection and an underground infiltration system.. Along the proposed building runoff from the roof will be collected via roof drains and connected into an 18" storm drain e pipe that will transfer the runoff into an underground infiltration system. Along the building there are biofiltration areas that will collect local c stormwater into a perforated pipe and divert the flow into the main 18" storm drain pipe running through the middle of the site. Stormwater that does not fall on the roof or into the biofiltration areas will be collected via area drain and transferred into the main 18" storm drain pipe running through the '- middle of the property and eventually collected in the underground infiltration system. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section II North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 4 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section II North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 5 The project is located in the 10 acre Lions Park located at 570 West 18th Street in the City of Costa Mesa, California. The park is bounded by Park Avenue on c the east, West 18th Street on the south, Anaheim Avenue on the west, and e various City complexes to the north (Costa Mesa Historical Society and Costa Mesa Fire Station Number 3). Two projects are proposed to be completed in two implementation phases. Phase 1 Library and Park Expansion will include a new two-story, 20,000 — Narrative Project Description: ; 22,000 -square foot library with landscape and site development immediately (Use as much space as around the building. The park expansion includes demolition of the single necessary.) story Neighborhood Community Center and creation of new park open space in its place. Other on-site work includes construction of a new 22 -car surface parking lot to be located on the west side of the park, in front of the Costa Mesa Historical Society, accessed from Anaheim Avenue. On-site development excluding the building footprint is 2.45 acres. Off-site e improvements include parkway reconstruction adjacent to the library and new angled parking adjacent to the park expansion in Park Avenue. E Phase 2 Donald Dungan Library Renovation — New Community Meeting c Center will include renovation of the existing Donald Dungan Library and c limited site development immediately around the existing building. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section II North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 5 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion 11.2 Potential Stormwater Pollutants Determine and list expected stormwater pollutants based on land uses and site activities. Refer to Section 2.2.2 and Table 2.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for guidance. 11.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Determine if streams located downstream from the project area are potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts. Refer to Section 2.2.3.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD)for North Orange County or Section 2.2.3.2 for South Orange County. ® No — Show map THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section II North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 6 Pollutants of Concern Check One for each: E=Expected Pollutant to be of concern Additional Information and Comments N=Not Expected to be of concern Suspended -Solid/ Sediment E ® N ❑ Nutrients E ® N ❑ Heavy Metals E ❑ N i Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) ( E ❑ N I I Pesticides E ® N ❑ Oil and Grease E ® N ❑ Toxic Organic Compounds E ® N ❑ i Trash and Debris E ® N ❑ 11.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Determine if streams located downstream from the project area are potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts. Refer to Section 2.2.3.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD)for North Orange County or Section 2.2.3.2 for South Orange County. ® No — Show map THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section II North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 6 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion ❑ Yes— Describe applicable hydrologic conditions of concern below. Refer to Section 2.2.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). N/A 11.4 Post Development Drainage Characteristics Describe post development drainage characteristics. Refer to Section 2.2.4 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section II North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 7 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion The proposed drainage patterns include a combination of two systems; local biofiltration with collection and an underground infiltration system. Along the proposed building runoff from the roof will be collected via roof drains and connected into an 18" storm drain pipe that will transfer the runoff into an underground infiltration system. Along the building there are biofiltration areas that will collect local stormwater into a perforated pipe and divert the flow into the main 18" storm drain pipe running through the middle of the site. Stormwater that does not fall on the roof or into the biofiltration areas will be collected via area drain and transferred into the main 18" storm drain pipe running through the middle of the property and eventually collected in the underground infiltration system. 11.5 Property Ownership/Management Describe property ownership/management. Refer to Section 2.2.5 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). The City of Costa Mesa will be the owner. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section II North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 8 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Section III Site Description 111.1 Physical Setting Fill out table with relevant information. Refer to Section 2.3.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Name of Planned Community/Planning Area N/A (if applicable) 1855 Park Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Location/Address General Plan Land Use Institutional Designation Zoning I I&R — Institutional and Recreational Acreage of Project Site 13.57 Predominant Soil Type ;Type D 111.2 Site Characteristics Fill out table with relevant information and include information regarding BMP sizing, suitability, and feasibility, as applicable. Refer to Section 2.3.2 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Site Characteristics Precipitation Zone 0.75 Topography Existing library and existing on-site .......... .... . ...... ...... . ............. . .... ... ..... ...._ ...... _ _............. .... ...................... ._....__._._._ .._.-_. _._._.._... ........... .............................. ............................ ............. _ _._........ . --- The existing drainage pattern has water on the northern parking lot of the Drainage property being sheet flowed through a curb and gutter into a an existing Patterns/Connections valley gutter, then water flows into an existing catch basin and eventually connects to the City of Costa Mesa public storm drain system. Water on the THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section III North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 9 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion .- ........ ....... ...... ......................... ........ ....... ...... ................._........................;_................................................................................. ... ....................._........................................................................._...................._.._.......................-.........................-.................................................. eastern parking lot is collected via a valley gutter running along the back of the parking stalls and eventually flows out of the eastern driveway on Park Avenue. From there the stormwater follows a curb and gutter running north along Park avenue and eventually enters a curb opening catch basin located at Plumer St. All the water collected on the building are collected via roof drains and is spilled into the existing concrete sidewalk and eventually the water lands on the landscape around the property. Raised planters are located around the building collect water and infiltration this stormwater. Water along the western parking lot is carried via a valley gutter flowing south along the back of the parking stalls and eventually falls on a curb opening catch basin along Anaheim Avenue. Then the water flows on the Costa Mesa public stormcirain system and eventually enters the lower Newport bay and eventually the pacific ocean. Soil Type, Geology, and Infiltration Properties D -Soils Hydrogeologic Depth to groundwater is greater than 50 feet (Groundwater) Conditions _ Geotechnical Conditions ....... _..._........ ...... ......... ......... ._..... ... .......... ....- ......... - ----- ..._....... _.._ The proposed infiltration rate is 12 in/hour. (relevant to infiltration) Off -Site Drainage N/A Utility and Infrastructure Information A proposed infiltration system will be used. 111.3 Watershed Description Fill out table with relevant information and include information regarding BMP sizing, suitability, and feasibility, as applicable. Refer to Section 2.3.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Receiving Waters1 Lower Newport Bay ......... ..... ...... . 303(d) Listed Impairments Chlordane, DDT(Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), Nutrients, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls), Pesticides, Applicable TMDLs Chlordane, Copper, DDT(Dichlorod iphenyltrich loroethane), PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls), Sediment Toxicity THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section III North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 10 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Pollutants of Concern for the N/A Project Environmentally Sensitive and Special Biological j N/A Significant Areas THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section III North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 11 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) IV. 1 Project Performance Criteria Describe project performance criteria. Several steps must be followed in order to determine what performance criteria will apply to a project. These steps include: • If the project has an approved WIHMP or equivalent, then any watershed specific criteria must be used and the project can evaluate participation in the approved regional or sub -regional opportunities. (Please ask your assigned planner or plan checker regarding whether your project is part of an approved WIHMP or equivalent.) • Determine applicable hydromodification control performance criteria. Refer to Section 7.11-2.4.2.2 of the Model WQMP. • Determine applicable LID performance criteria. Refer to Section 7.11-2.4.3 of the Model WQMP. • Determine applicable treatment control BMP performance criteria. Refer to Section 7.11-3.2.2 of the Model WQMP. • Calculate the LID design storm capture volume for the project. Refer to Section 7.11-2.4.3 of the Model WQMP. (NOC Permit Area only) Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent LID feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing LID on regional or sub - regional basis? YES ❑ NO If yes, describe WIHMP feasibility criteria or N/A regional/sub-regional LID opportunities. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 12 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Project Performance Criteria If HCOC exists, list applicable hydromodification E N/A control performance criteria (Section 7.11- 2.4.2.2 in MWQMP) List applicable LID performance criteria iN/A (Section 7.11-2.4.3 from MWQMP) List applicable treatment control BMP performance criteria (Section 7.11- 3.2.2 from MWQMP) Calculate LID design storm capture volume for Project. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 13 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion IV.2. Site Design and Drainage Describe site design and drainage including • A narrative of site design practices utilized or rationale for not using practices; • A narrative of how site is designed to allow BMPs to be incorporated to the MEP • A table of DMA characteristics and list of LID BMPs proposed in each DMA. • Reference to the WQMP "BMP Exhibit." • Calculation of Design Capture Volume (DCV) for each drainage area. • A listing of GIS coordinates for LID and Treatment Control BMPs. Refer to Section 2.4.2 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). The proposed drainage patterns include a combination of two systems; local biofiltration with collection and an underground infiltration system. Along the proposed building runoff from the roof will be collected via roof drains and connected into an 18" storm drain pipe that will transfer the runoff into an underground infiltration system. Along the building there are biofiltration areas that will collect local stormwater into a perforated pipe and divert the flow into the main 18" storm drain pipe running through the middle of the site. Stormwater that does not fall on the roof or into the biofiltration areas will be collected via area drain and transferred into the main 18" storm drain pipe running through the middle of the property and eventually collected in the underground infiltration system. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 14 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion IV.3 LID BMP Selection and Project Conformance Analysis Each sub -section below documents that the proposed design features conform to the applicable project performance criteria via check boxes, tables, calculations, narratives, and/or references to worksheets. Refer to Section 2.4.2.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for selecting LID BMPs and Section 2.4.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for conducting conformance analysis with project performance criteria. IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls (HSCs) If required HSCs are included, fill out applicable check box forms. If the retention criteria are otherwise met with other LID BMPs, include a statement indicating HSCs not required. Name Included? Localized on -lot infiltration ❑ Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top disconnection) ❑ Street trees (canopy interception) ❑ Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) ❑ Green roofs/Brown roofs ❑ Blue roofs ❑ Impervious area reduction (e.g. permeable pavers, site design) ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 15 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion IV -3.2 Infiltration BMPs Identify infiltration BMPs to be used in project. If design volume cannot be met, state why. Name Included? D:...-..a....a:.......:a l..... .a .... J....J.._:... UIVI CLCI ILMI VVILI IVUL UI IUCI UI dill) r—i LJ Rain gardens ❑ Porous landscaping ❑ Infiltration planters ❑ Retention swales ❑ Infiltration trenches ❑ Infiltration basins ❑ Drywells ❑ Subsurface infiltration galleries French drains ❑ Permeable asphalt ❑ Permeable concrete ❑ PermeahlP rnnrretP pavers ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Show calculations below to demonstrate if the LID Design Strom Capture Volume can be met with infiltration BMPs. If not, document how much can be met with infiltration and document why it is not feasible to meet the full volume with infiltration BMPs. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 16 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Calculations are shown in Appendix E IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs If the full Design Storm Capture Volume cannot be met with infiltration BMPs, describe any evapotranspiration and/or rainwater harvesting BMPs included. Name Included? All HSCs; See Section IV.3.1 ❑ Surface -based infiltration BMPs ❑ Biotreatment BMPs ❑ Above -ground cisterns and basins ❑ Underground detention ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 17 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Show calculations below to demonstrate if the LID Design Storm Capture Volume can be met with evapotranspiration and/or rainwater harvesting BMPs in combination with infiltration BMPs. If not, document below how much can be met with either infiltration BMPs, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting BMPs, or a combination, and document why it is not feasible to meet the full volume with these BMP categories. N/A THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 18 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs If the full Design Storm Capture Volume cannot be met with infiltration BMPs, and/or evapotranspiration and rainwater harvesting BMPs, describe biotreatment BMPs included. Include sections for selection, suitability, sizing, and infeasibility, as applicable. Name Included? Bioretention with underdrains ❑ Stormwater planter boxes with underdrains ❑ Rain gardens with underdrains ❑ Constructed wetlands ❑ Vegetated swales ❑ Vegetated filter strips ❑ Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems ❑ Wet extended detention basin ❑ Dry extended detention basins ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Show calculations below to demonstrate if the LID Design Storm Capture Volume can be met with infiltration, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting and/or biotreatment BMPs. If not, document how much can be met with either infiltration BMPs, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting BMPs, or a combination, and document why it is not feasible to meet the full volume with these BMP categories. N/A THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 19 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs Describe hydromodification control BMPs. See Section 5 of the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Include sections for selection, suitability, sizing, and infeasibility, as applicable. Detail compliance with Prior Conditions of Approval (if applicable). Hydromodification Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs Describe regional/sub-regional LID BMPs in which the project will participate. Refer to Section 7.11-2.4.3.2 of the Model WQMP. Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs N/A THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 20 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs Treatment control BMPs can only be considered if the project conformance analysis indicates that it is not feasible to retain the full design capture volume with LID BMPs. Describe treatment control BMPs including sections for selection, sizing, and infeasibility, as applicable. Treatment Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 21 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion IV.3.8 Non-structural Source Control BMPs Fill out non-structural source control check box forms or provide a brief narrative explaining if non-structural source controls were not used. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 22 Non -Structural Source Control BMPs Check One Identifier Name If not applicable, state brief Included Not Annlirnhlo reason N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants ® ❑ and Occupants .................................................................................................................................................................. N2 Activity Restrictions ❑ ® No CCR are proposed .................................................................................................................................................................. N3 Common Area Landscape Management ® ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. N4 BMP Maintenance ® ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How No hazardous waste from this development will comply) project .................................................................................................................................................................. N6 Local Industrial Permit Compliance ❑ ® No local water quality ordinance .................................................................................................................................................................. N7 ❑ ® No hazardous waste from this Spill Contingency Plan property .................................................................................................................................................................. N8❑ ® No underground storage tank Underground Storage Tank Compliance within the project boundary .................................................................................................................................................................. N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure ❑ ® No hazardous waste from this Compliance project. .................................................................................................................................................................. N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation El® No fire code implementation. .................................................................................................................................................................. N11 Common Area Litter Control ® ❑ ..................... N12 ........................................................................................................................................... Employee Training ® ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. N13No ❑ ® loading docks are proposed for Housekeeping of Loading Docks this project. .................................................................................................................................................................. N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection ® ❑ .................................................................................................................................................................. N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and ® ❑ Parking Lots ................................................................................................................................................. N16 ❑ ® p ............. No gasoline outlets are proposed .for Retail Gasoline Outlets this project. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 22 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs Fill out structural source control check box forms or provide a brief narrative explaining if structural source controls were not used. Structural Source Control BMPs Check One Identifier Name Not If not applicable, state brief reason Included Applicable S1 Provide storm drain system stenciling and ® ❑ signage Design and construct outdoor material No hazardous material is proposed S2 storage areas to reduce pollution ❑ for this project. introduction Design and construct trash and waste S3 storage areas to reduce pollution ® ❑ introduction Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape S4 design, water conservation, smart ® ❑ controllers, and source control S5 Protect slopes and channels and provide ❑ ® No protected slopes in this project. energy dissipation Incorporate requirements applicable to individual priority project categories (from ❑ ® No requirements from SDRWQCB. SDRWQCB NPDES Permit) S6 Dock areas ❑ ® No dock areas in this project. S7 Maintenance bays ❑ ® No maintenance bays in this project. S8 Vehicle wash areas ❑ ® No vehicle wash areas in this project. Outdoor ❑ No outdoor processing areas in this S9 processing areas project. S10 Equipment ❑ ® No equipment wash areas in this wash areas project. S11 Fueling areas ❑ ® No fueling areas in this project. S12 Hillside landscaping ❑ ® No hill side landscaping in this project. S13 Wash water control for food preparation ❑ ® No food preparation areas in this areas project. S14 Community ❑ ® No community car wash racks in this car wash racks project. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 23 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion IV.4 Alternative Compliance Plan (If Applicable) Describe an alternative compliance plan (if applicable). Include alternative compliance obligations (i.e., gallons, pounds) and describe proposed alternative compliance measures. Refer to Section 7.113.0 in the WQMP. IV.4.1 Water Quality Credits Determine if water quality credits are applicable for the project. Refer to Section 3.1 of the Model WQMP for description of credits and Appendix VI of the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for calculation methods for applying water quality credits. Description of Proposed Project Project Types that Qualify for Water Quality Credits (Select all that apply): ----------------------------- ®Redevelopment ❑Brownfield redevelopment, meaning — -- - — --- — --- El Higher density development projects which projects that reduce the i redevelopment, expansion, or reuse of real i include two distinct categories (credits can only be overall impervious property which may be complicated by the taken for one category): those with more than footprint of the project presence or potential presence of hazardous seven units per acre of development (lower credit site. substances, pollutants or contaminants, and which allowance); vertical density developments, for i have the potential to contribute to adverse ground I example, those with a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 2 or surface WQ if not redeveloped. or those having more than 18 units per acre (greater credit allowance). " Mixed use development, such as a combination of residential, commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or other land uses which incorporate design principles that can demonstrate environmental benefits that would not be realized through single use projects (e.g. reduced vehicle trip traffic with the potential to reduce sources of water or air pollution). ❑Developments with dedication of undeveloped portions to parks, preservation areas and other pervious uses. LJ Transit -oriented developments, such as a mixed use residential or commercial area designed to maximize access to public transportation; similar to above criterion, but where the development center is within one half mile of a mass transit center (e.g. bus, rail, light rail or commuter train station). Such projects would not be able to take credit for both categories, but may have greater credit assigned I Developments in ❑ Developments I historic districts in a city center i or historic area. preservation I areas. LJ Live -work developments, a variety of developments designed to support residential and vocational needs together — similar to criteria to mixed use development; would not be able to take credit for both categories. IJ Redevelopment projects in an established historic district, historic preservation area, or similar significant city area including core City Center areas (to be defined through mapping). LJln-fill projects, the conversion of empty lots and other underused spaces into more beneficially used spaces, such as residential or commercial areas. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 24 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Calculation of Water Quality Credits (if applicable) IV.4.2 Alternative Compliance Plan Information Describe an alternative compliance plan (if applicable). Include alternative compliance obligations (i.e., gallons, pounds) and describe proposed alternative compliance measures. Refer to Section 7.113.0 in the Model WQMP. N/A THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section IV North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 25 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs Fill out information in table below. Prepare and attach an Operation and Maintenance Plan. Identify the funding mechanism through which BMPs will be maintained. Inspection and maintenance records must be kept for a minimum of five years for inspection by the regulatory agencies. Refer to Section 7.114.0 in the Model WQMP. BMP Inspection/Maintenance BMP Reponsible Party(s) Inspection/ Maintenance Minimum Frequency of Activities Activities Required Before and after a Contech Infiltration System The City of Costa Mesa major storm event; before and after the Yearly wet season THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section v North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 26 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) VU BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) Include a BMP Exhibit (Site Plan), at a size no less than 24" by 36," which includes the following minimum information: • Insert in the title block (lower right hand corner) of BMP Exhibit: the WQMP Number (assigned by staff) and the grading/building or Planning Application permit numbers • Project location (address, tract/lot number(s), etc.) • Site boundary • Land uses and land covers, as applicable • Suitability/feasibility constraints • Structural BMP locations • Drainage delineations and flow information • Delineate the area being treated by each structural BMP • GIS coordinates for LID and Treatment Control BMPs • Drainage connections • BMP details • Preparer name and stamp Please do not include any areas outside of the project area or any information not related to drainage or water quality. The approved BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) shall be submitted as a plan sheet on all grading and building plan sets submitted for plan check review and approval. The BMP Exhibit shall be at the same size as the rest of the plan sheets in the submittal and shall have an approval stamp and signature prior to plan check submittal. VI.2 Submittal and Recordation of Water Quality Management Plan Following approval of the Final Project -Specific WQMP, three copies of the approved WQMP (including BMP Exhibit, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan, and Appendices) shall be submitted. In addition, these documents shall be submitted in a PDF format. Each approved WQMP (including BMP Exhibit, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan, and Appendices) shall be recorded in the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's Office, prior to close-out of grading and/or building permit. Educational Materials are not required to be included. THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section VI North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 27 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Costa Mesa Library and Park Expansion Section VII Educational Materials Refer to the Orange County Stormwater Program (ocwatersheds.com) for a library of materials available. Please only attach the educational materials specifically applicable to this project. Other materials specific to the project may be included as well and must be attached. Education Materials Residential Material Check If Business Material Check If (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Applicable (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door ® Tips for the Automotive Industry ❑ Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers ❑ Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar ❑ Tips for the Home Mechanic ❑ Tips for the Food Service Industry ❑ Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water ❑ Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Use Business Household Tips ❑ Other Material Other Check If Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous El Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection ❑ ❑ Center (North County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection ❑ ❑ Center (Central County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection ❑ ❑ Center (South County) Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System ❑ ❑ Responsible Pest Control ❑ ❑ Sewer Spill ❑ ❑ Tips for the Home Improvement Projects ❑ ❑ Tips for Horse Care ❑ ❑ Tips for Landscaping and Gardening ® ❑ Tips for Pet Care ❑ ❑ Tips for Pool Maintenance ❑ ❑ Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and ❑ ❑ Hardscape Drains Tips for Projects Using Paint ❑ ❑ THE CITY OF COSTA MESA Section VII North OC Priority WQMP Template August 17 2011 Page 28 Attachment A NOTICE - - - - - - --- .. .. ...... BASE MAP AN cl OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES IN ORANGE COUNTY 54 '5q -1-1 54 J -,w AT NOTICE - - - - - - --- .. .. ...... BASE MAP AN cl OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES IN ORANGE COUNTY 54 '5q -1-1 54 Attachment 6 Attachment C Q _ s O'iun 0 0 s Q IM CE a� OO 0 Iloilo XVI -1 , n., . LEGEND �] City Boundaries - � '+•.....Am J r� a ��u,l�r •. . (�] OCWD Groundwater Basin Protection Boundary e` I Depth To Groundwater t '+� N ' Note: Data are not available for South Orange County at this time. r 4 r �� .e .. , c - . ,r., ; f I" "G^. Source: Sprone, Fuller and Greenwood, 1980. California Division of Mines and Geology; California Geological Survey i r _nA �r �r • , r I _.._.. iZ`�•...., lf,� tit 3- , :a- Y M _ v yt� `r Project s Location D 2 4 8 ....... �. f. Muer 3a 0 1.25 2.5 5 c� a a � �O vOO �a a U �a V O Oo 0 U W z Z of 4 O Wq U Q¢ XVI -2e IN®®N XVI -1 XVI -2e 201 It Attachment D IC3. BUILDING MAINTENANCE Pollution Prevention Consider pollution prevention measures at all times for improving pollution control. Implementation of pollution prevention measures may reduce or eliminate the need to implement other more costly or complicated procedures. The following pollution prevention principles apply to most industries: • Affirmative Procurement - Use alternative, safer, or recycled products. • Redirect storm water flows away from areas of concern. Reduce use of water or use dry methods. Reduce storm water flow across facility site. • Recycle and reuse waste products and waste 1. Properly collect and dispose of water when pressure washing buildings, rooftops, and other large objects. 2. Properly prepare work area before conducting building maintenance. 3. Properly clean and dispose of equipment and wastes used and generated during building maintenance. 4. Employ soil erosion and stabilization techniques when exposing large areas of soil. 5. Store toxic material under cover when not in use and during precipitation events. 6. Properly dispose of fluids from air conditioning, cooling tower, and condensate drains. 7. Regularly inspect air emission control equipment under AQMD permit. 8. Train employees on these BMPs, storm water discharge prohibitions, and wastewater discharge requirements. OPTIONAL: 9. Switch to non-toxic chemicals for maintenance when possible. Use chemicals that can be recycled. flows. Move or cover potential pollution from storm water contact. Provide on-going employee training in pollution prevention. Best Management Practices 1. Properly collect and dispose of water when pressure washing buildings, rooftops, and other large objects. • If pressure washing where the surrounding area is paved, use a water collection device that enables collection of wash water and associated solids. Use a sump pump, wet vacuum or similarly effective device to collect the runoff and loose materials. Dispose of the collected runoff and solids properly. • If pressure washing on a grassed area (with or without soap), runoff must be dispersed as sheet flow as much as possible, rather than as a concentrated stream. The wash runoff must remain on the grass and not drain to pavement. 2. Properly prepare work area before conducting building maintenance. • Use ground or drop cloths underneath outdoor painting, scraping, and sandblasting work, and properly dispose of collected material daily. • Use a ground cloth or oversized tub for activities such as paint mixing and tool cleaning. • Use a storm drain cover, filter fabric, or similarly effective runoff control mechanism if dust, grit, wash water, or other pollutants may escape the work area and enter a storm drain. 3. Properly clean and dispose of equipment and wastes used and generated during building maintenance. • Clean paint brushes and tools covered with water-based paints in sinks connected to sanitary sewers or in portable containers that can be dumped into a sanitary sewer IC3 Building Maintenance drain. Brushes and tools covered with non -water-based paints, finishes, or other materials must be cleaned in a manner that enables collection of used solvents (e.g., paint thinner, turpentine, etc.) for recycling or proper disposal. Properly dispose of wash water, sweepings, and sediments. Properly store equipment, chemicals, and wastes. Do not dump any toxic substance or liquid waste on the pavement, the ground, or toward a storm drain. OPTIONAL: • Recycle residual paints, solvents, lumber, and other materials to the maximum extent practicable 4. Employ soil erosion and stabilization techniques when exposing large areas of soil. • Confine excavated materials to pervious surfaces away from storm drain inlets, sidewalks, pavement, and ditches. Material must be covered if rain is expected. • Use chemical stabilization or geosynthetics to stabilize bare ground surfaces. 5. Store toxic material under cover when not in use and during precipitation events. 6. Properly dispose of fluids from air conditioning, cooling tower, and condensate drains. 7. Regularly inspect air emission control equipment under AQMD permit. 8. Training 1. Train employees on these BMPs, storm water discharge prohibitions, and wastewater discharge requirements. 2. Train employees on proper spill containment and cleanup. • Establish training that provides employees with the proper tools and knowledge to immediately begin cleaning up a spill. • Ensure that employees are familiar with the site's spill control plan and/or proper spill cleanup procedures. • BMP IC17 discusses Spill Prevention and Control in detail. 3. Establish a regular training schedule, train all new employees, and conduct annual refresher training. 4. Use a training log or similar method to document training. OPTIONAL: 9. Switch to non-toxic chemicals for maintenance when possible. • If cleaning agents are used, select biodegradable products whenever feasible • Consider using a waterless and non-toxic chemical cleaning method for graffiti removal (e.g. gels or spray compounds). 10. Use chemicals that can be recycled. Buy recycled products to the maximum extent practicable References California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks. Industrial/Commercial Best Management Practice Handbook. Prepared by Camp Dresser& McKee, Larry Walker Associates, Uribe and Associates, Resources Planning Associates for Stormwater Quality Task Force. March 1993. IC3 Building Maintenance King County Stormwater Pollution Control Manual. Best Management Practices for Businesses. King County Surface Water Management. July 1995. On-line: http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Volume IV Source Control BMPs. Prepared by Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program. Publication No. 99-14, August 2001. 10 Building Maintenance TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES INF -7: Underground Infiltration Underground infiltration is a vault or chamber with an open bottom that used to store runoff and percolate into the subsurface. A number of vendors offer proprietary infiltration products that allow for similar or enhanced rates of infiltration and subsurface storage while offering durable prefrabricated structures. There are many varieties of proprietary infiltration BMPs that can be used for roads and parking lots, parks and open spaces, single and multi -family residential, or mixed-use and coil mercial uses. Feasibility Screening Considerations • Infiltration bains shall pass infeasible screening criteria to be considered for use. ➢ Infiltration vault ➢ Recharge vault Underground Infiltration Source: http://www.contech-cpi.com • Underground infiltration galleries pose a potential risk of groundwater contamination; pretreatment should be used. Opportunity Criteria • Soils are adequate for infiltration or can be amended to provide an adequate infiltration rate. • Appropriate for sites with limited surface space. • Can be placed beneath roads, parking lots, parks, and athletic fields. • Potential for groundwater contamination can be mitigated through isolation of pollutant sources, pretreatment of inflow, and/or demonstration of adequate treatment capacity of underlying soils. • Infiltration is into native soil, or depth of engineered fill is <_ 5 feet from the bottom of the facility to native material and infiltration into fill is approved by a geotechnical professional. • Tributary area land uses include mixed-use and commercial, sngle-family and multi -family, roads and parking lots, and parks and open spaces. High pollutant land uses should not be tributary to infiltration BMPs. OC -Specific Design Criteria and Considerations Placement of BMPs should observe geotechnical recommendations with respect to geological ❑ hazards (e.g. landslides, liquefaction zones, erosion, etc.) and set -backs (e.g., foundations, utilities, roadways, etc.) ❑ Minimum separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater of 10 feet shall be observed. ❑ Minimum pretreatment should be provided upstream of the infiltration facility, and water bypassing pretreatment should not be directed to the facility. ❑ Underground infiltration should not be used for drainage areas with high sediment production potential unless preceded by full treatment control with a BMP effective for sediment removal. ❑ Design infiltration rate should be determined as described in Appendix Vii. ❑ Inspection ports or similar design features shall be provided to verify continued system performance and identify need for major maintenance. XIV -44 May 19, 2011 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Ei For infiltration facilities beneath roads and parking areas, structural requirements should meet H-20 load requirements. Computing Underground Infiltration Device Size Underground infiltration devices vary by design and by proprietary designs. The sizing method selected for use must be based on the BMP type it most strongly resembles. • For underground infiltration devices with open pore volume (e.g., vaults, crates, pipe sections, etc), sizing will be most similar to infiltration basins. • For underground infiltration devices with pore space (e.g., aggregate reservoirs), sizing will be most similar to permeable pavement. Additional References for Design Guidance = Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Stormwater Technical Manual, Chapter 5: http.j/www.laschools.org/employee/design/fs-studies-and- reports/download/white paper report -material/Storm Water Technical Manual 2009-opt- red.pdfNersion__id=76975850 XIV -45 May 19, 2011 IC15. PARKING AND STORAGE AREA MAINTENANCE Pollution Prevention Consider pollution prevention measures at all times for improving pollution control. Implementation of pollution prevention measures may reduce or eliminate the need to implement other more costly or complicated procedures. The following pollution prevention principles apply to most industries: • Affirmative Procurement - Use alternative, safer, or recycled products. • Redirect storm water flows away from areas of concern. • Reduce use of water or use dry methods. • Reduce storm water flow across facility site. • Recycle and reuse waste products and waste flows. • Move or cover potential pollution from storm water contact. • Provide on-going employee training in pollution prevention. Best Management Practices 1. Conduct regular cleaning. 1 Conduct regular cleaning. 2. Properly collect and dispose of wash water. 3. Consider use of source treatment BMPs to treat runoff. 4. Keep the parking and storage areas clean and orderly. 5. When cleaning heavy oily deposits: 6. When conducting surface repair work: 7. Conduct inspections on a regular basis. & Keep accurate maintenance logs to evaluate materials removed/stored and improvements made. 9. Arrange rooftop drains to prevent drainage directly onto paved surfaces. 10. Train employees on these BMPs, storm water discharge pprohibitions, and wastewater discharge requirements. ivnwiuuna, and rru�wvruici uiouiiaiyu iuyvirem�.nw. • Sweeping or vacuuming the parking facility is encouraged over other methods. • Sweep all parking lots at least once before the onset of the wet season. OPTIONAL: • Establish frequency of sweeping based on usage and field observations of waste accumulation. 2. Properly collect and dispose of wash water. • Block the storm drain or contain runoff. • Wash water should be collected and pumped to the sanitary sewer or discharged to a pervious surface, do not allow wash water to enter storm drains. DO NOT discharge wash water to sanitary sewer until contacting the local sewer authority to find out if pretreatment is required. • Dispose of parking lot sweeping debris and dirt at a landfill. 3. Consider use of source treatment BMPs to treat runoff. • Allow sheet runoff to flow into biofilters (vegetated strip and swale) and/or infiltration devices. • Utilize sand filters or oleophilic collectors for oily waste in low quantities. 4. Keep the parking and storage areas clean and orderly. • Clean out and cover litter receptacles frequently to prevent spillage. • Remove debris in a timely fashion. OPTIONAL: • Post "No Littering" signs. 5. When cleaning heavy oily deposits: • If possible, clean oily spots with absorbent materials. • Do not allow discharges to the storm drain. • Appropriately dispose of spilled materials and absorbents. 6. When conducting surface repair work: • Pre -heat, transfer or load hot bituminous material away from storm drain inlets. IC 15 Parking -Storage Area Maintenance • Conduct surface repair work during dry weather to prevent contamination from contacting stormwater runoff. • Cover and seal nearby storm drain inlets (with waterproof material or mesh) and manholes before applying seal coat, slurry seal, etc. Leave covers in place until job is complete and clean any debris for proper disposal. • To avoid runoff, use only as much water as necessary for dust control. • Use drip pans or absorbent material to catch drips from paving equipment that is not in use. Dispose of collected material and absorbents properly. 7. Conduct inspections on a regular basis. • Designate personnel to conduct inspections of the parking facilities and stormwater conveyance systems associated with them. • Inspect cleaning equipment/sweepers for leaks on a regular basis. 8. Keep accurate maintenance logs to evaluate materials removed/stored and improvements made. 9. Arrange rooftop drains to prevent drainage directly onto paved surfaces. 10. Training 1. Train employees on these BMPs, storm water discharge prohibitions, and wastewater discharge requirements. 2. Train employees on proper spill containment and cleanup. • Establish training that provides employees with the proper tools and knowledge to immediately begin cleaning up a spill. • Ensure that employees are familiar with the site's spill control plan and/or proper spill cleanup procedures. • BMP IC17 discusses Spill Prevention and Control in detail. 3. Provide regular training to field employees and/or contractors regarding cleaning of paved areas and proper operation of equipment. 4. Establish a regular training schedule, train all new employees, and conduct annual refresher training. 5. Use a training log or similar method to document training. References California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks. Industrial/Commercial Best Management Practice Handbook. Prepared by Camp Dresser& McKee, Larry Walker Associates, Uribe and Associates, Resources Planning Associates for Stormwater Quality Task Force. March 1993. King County Stormwater Pollution Control Manual. Best Management Practices for Businesses. King County Surface Water Management. July 1995. On-line: http://dr..r.metrokc.gov/wlr/dss/spcm.htm Model Urban Runoff Program: A How -To Guide for Developing Urban Runoff Programs for Small Municipalities. Prepared by City of Monterey, City of Santa Cruz, California Coastal Commission, Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, Woodward -Clyde, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. July 1998 (Revised February 2002 by the California Coastal Commission). Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Volume IV Source Control BMPs. Prepared by Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program. Publication No. 99-14. August 2001. IC15 Parking -Storage Area Maintenance IC21. WASTE HANDLING AND DISPOSAL Pollution Prevention Consider pollution prevention measures at all times for improving pollution control. Implementation of pollution prevention measures may reduce or eliminate the need to implement other more costly or complicated procedures. The following pollution prevention principles apply to most industries: • Affirmative Procurement - Use alternative, safer, or recycled products. • Redirect storm water flows away from areas of 1. Prevent waste materials from coming in direct contact with wind or rain. 2. Design waste handling and disposal area to prevent stormwater runon. 3. Design waste handling and disposal area to contain spills. 4. Keep waste collection areas clean. 5. Secure solid waste containers when not in use. 6. Regularly inspect, repair, and/or replace waste containers. 7. Do not fill waste containers with washout water or any other liquid. 8. Use all of a product before disposing of the container. 9. Segregated wastes by type and label and date wastes. 10. Label and store hazardous wastes according to hazardous waste regulations. 11. Train employees on these BMPs, storm water discharge pI VIIIUIUUIIJ, AIIU W4JlCWate1 UWGIIdIyC IeqUll eIllCllls. OPTIONAL: 12. Minimize waste. concern. • Reduce use of water or use dry methods. • Reduce storm water flow across facility site. • Recycle and reuse waste products and waste flows. • Move or cover potential pollution from storm water contact. • Provide on-going employee training in pollution prevention. Best Management Practices 1. Prevent waste materials from coming in direct contact with wind or rain. • Cover the waste management area with a permanent roof. • If this is not feasible, cover waste piles with temporary covering material such as reinforced tarpaulin, polyethylene, polyurethane, polypropylene, or hypalon. • Cover dumpsters to prevent rain from washing out waste materials. 2. Design waste handling and disposal area to prevent stormwater runon. • Enclose the waste handling and disposal area or build a berm around it. • Position roof downspouts to direct stormwater away from waste handling and disposal area. 3. Design waste handling and disposal area to contain spills. Place dumpsters or other waste receptacles on an impervious surface. • Construct a berm around the area to contain spills. • Install drains connected to the public sewer or the facility's process wastewater system within these contained areas. DO NOT discharge to a public sewer until contacting the local sewer authority to find out if pretreatment is required. 4. Keep waste collection areas clean. • When cleaning around waste handling and disposal areas use dry methods when possible (e.g. sweeping, use of absorbents). • If water must be used, collect water and discharge to the sewer if permitted to do so. DO NOT discharge to a public sewer until contacting the local sewer authority to find out if pretreatment is required. If discharge to the sanitary sewer is not allowed, pump water to a tank and dispose of properly. IC21 Waste Handling and Disposal OPTIONAL: • Post "No Littering" signs. 5. Secure solid waste containers when not in use. 6. Regularly inspect, repair, and/or replace waste containers. 7. Do not fill waste containers with washout water or any other liquid. 8. Use all of a product before disposing of the container. 9. Segregate wastes by type and label and date wastes. • Do not mix wastes; this can cause chemical reactions, make recycling impossible, and complicate disposal. • Ensure that only appropriate solid wastes are added to solid waste containers. • Certain wastes such as hazardous wastes, appliances, fluorescent lamps, pesticides, etc. may not be disposed of in solid waste containers. 10. Label and store hazardous wastes according to hazardous waste regulations. • Consult your local hazardous waste agency or Fire Department for details. • Obtain a hazardous waste generator license or permit. 11. Training 1. Train employees on these BMPs, storm water discharge prohibitions, and wastewater discharge requirements. 2. Train employees in proper waste handling and disposal. 3. Train employees on proper spill containment and cleanup. • Establish training that provides employees with the proper tools and knowledge to immediately begin cleaning up a spill. • Ensure that employees are familiar with the site's spill control plan and/or proper spill cleanup procedures. • BMP IC17 discusses Spill Prevention and Control in detail. 4. Establish a regular training schedule, train all new employees, and conduct annual refresher training. 5. Use a training log or similar method to document training. OPTIONAL: 12. Minimize waste. • Recycle materials whenever possible. • Modify processes or equipment to increase efficiency. • Identify and promote use of non -hazardous alternatives. • Reduction in the amount of waste generated can be accomplished using many different types of source controls such as: ■ Production planning and sequencing ■ Process or equipment modification ■ Raw material substitution or elimination ■ Loss prevention and housekeeping ■ Waste segregation and separation IC21 Waste Handling and Disposal ■ Close loop recycling • Establish a material tracking system to increase awareness about material usage. This may reduce spills and minimize contamination, thus reducing the amount of waste produced. References California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks. Industrial/Commercial Best Management Practice Handbook. Prepared by Camp Dresser& McKee, Larry Walker Associates, Uribe and Associates, Resources Planning Associates for Stormwater Quality Task Force. March 1993. Model Urban Runoff Program: A How -To Guide for Developing Urban Runoff Programs for Small Municipalities. neparcu uy �.nCity vi rvwincrey, �,ny Ui .�aina � iuZ, vamvriii8 vvaotai vviiuiii$$ioii, ivivincicy Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, Woodward -Clyde, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. July 1998 (Revised February 2002 by the California Coastal Commission). OPTIONAL: • Reduction in the amount of waste generated can be accomplished using many different types of source controls such as: - Production planning and sequencing - Process or equipment modification - Raw material substitution or elimination - Loss prevention and housekeeping - Waste segregation and separation - Close loop recycling Establish a material tracking system to increase awareness about material usage. This may reduce spills and minimize contamination, thus reducing the amount of waste produced. IC21 Waste Handling and Disposal For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1.877.89.SPILL M' visit www.ocwatersheds.com To rel_)ort a spill, call the Orange County 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at 1.877.89.SPILL. For emergencies, dial 911. "I'hc tips contained in this brochure provide nseli1l information to help protcctvouc lvatcrslwd. It you have otlicr sm-gc.stions, plcase contact vour citv's storiuwatcr representatives of call the Oran -c Cotutty Stonnwater Program. P R S O J E C T P0144+1O" _« P R E V E N i 1 O N Printed un Ree acted Paper My Watershed. Our Ocean. Water + shed, noun: A region of land within which water flows down into a specified water body, such as a river, take, sea, or ocean; a drainage basin or catchment basin. Orange County is comprised of 11 major watersheds into which most of our water flows, connecting all of Orange County to the Pacific Ocean. As water from rain (stormwater) or sprinklers and ' hoses (urban runoff) runs down "= your driveway and into your neighborhood streets, sidewalks and gutters, it flows into storm drains that lead to waterways within your watershed. The waterways from other cities merge as they make their way through our watersheds until all the runoff water in Orange County meets at the Pacific Ocean. The water that reaches our ocean is not pure. As it flows through the watershed, it picks up pollutants such as litter, cigarette butts, fertilizer, pesticides, pet waste, motor oil and lawn clippings. Unlike water that enters the sewer (from sinks and toilets), water that enters the storm drain is not treated before it flows, ultimately, to the ocean. Water quality can be improved by "Adopting Your f) organizations to join the Orange County Stormwater Program and others who are working to protect and restore our creeks, rivers, bays and ocean. There are many opportunities to get involved: • Appreciate your watershed - explore the creeks, trails and ocean and make observations about its conditions. If you see anything abnormal (such as dead fish, oil spills, leaking barrels, and other pollution) contact the Orange County 24-hour water pollution problem reporting hotline at 1 877 89 SPILL to report the roblem Follow these simple tips to protect the water quality of your watershed: • Sweep up debris and dispose of it in the trash. Do not hose down driveways or sidewalks into the street or gutter. • Use dry cleanup methods such as cat litter to absorb spills and sweep up residue. • Set your irrigation systems to reflect seasonal water needs or use weather -based controllers. Inspect for runoff regularly. • Cover trashcans securely. • Take hazardous waste to a household hazardous waste collection center. (For example, paint, batteries and petroleum products) • Pick up after your pet. • Follow application and disposal directions for pesticides and fertilizers. • If you wash your car at home, wash it on your lawn or divert the runoff onto a landscaped area. Consider taking your car to a • Rour watershed. earn commercial car wash, where the Research Learn ° water is reclaimed or recycled. about what watershedou live in b Y Y� •Keep your car well visiting www.ocwatersheds.com. I-/-,nei °C,o/to �,reeR malntalned. • Find a watershed organization ° • Never pour oil or inyour community and ® •f • lu volunteer to help. If there ° Jv are no active groups, consider starting your own • Visit EPA's Adopt Your Ai�-e,r 3,,, h,n't Watershed's Catalog of Groups � Watershed at ° www.epa.gov/adopt to ° locate groups in your community. • Organize or join in a creek, river, bay or A� ocean cleanup event such as Coastal & Inner �A' Coastal Cleanup Day C' anU reeze m e sanla Ana R'wer street, gutter or p storm drain. / ti Newport Bay ° � that takes place the p 3rd Saturday of every September. For more information visit + ��ar Matec C Watershed. Through this ww1V.coast4u.org. in �e 11, , effort, we are y, a challenging citizens and Preventing water pollution at your cofnmercial/industrial site Clean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many landscape and building maintenance activities can lead to water pollution if you're not careful. Paint, chemicals, plant clippings and other materials can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never pour soap or fertilizers into the ocean, so why would you let them enter the storm drains? Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Some types of industrial facilities are required to obtain coverage under the State General Industrial Permit. For more information visit: www.swrcb.ca.gov/stormwater/industrial.htm] For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com "10 report a spill, call the Orange County 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) . For emergencies, dial 911. RECYCLE USED OIL �s _«1 Printed on Recycled Paper P R O J E C T POM4+10" P R E V E N T I O N Landscape Maintenance Building Maintenance 11 Call your trash hauler to replace leaking dumpsters. ■ Compost grass clippings, leaves, sticks and other vegetation, or dispose of it at a permitted landfill or in green waste containers. Do not dispose of these materials in the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ Irrigate slowly and inspect the system for leaks, overspraying and runoff. Adjust automatic timers to avoid overwatering. ■ Follow label directions for the use and disposal of fertilizers and pesticides. ■ Do not apply pesticides or fertilizers if rain is expected within 48 hours or if wind speeds are above 5 mph. ■ Do not spray pesticides within 100 feet of waterways. ■ Fertilizers should be worked into the soil rather than dumped onto the surface. ■ If fertilizer is spilled on the pavement or sidewalk, sweep it up immediately and place it back in the container. ■ Never allow washwater, sweepings or sediment to enter the storm drain. ■ Sweep up dry spills and use cat litter, towels or similar materials to absorb wet spills. Dispose of it in the trash. ■ If you wash your building, sidewalk or parking lot, you must contain the water. Use a shop vac to collect the water and contact your city or sanitation agency for proper disposal information. Do not let water enter the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ Use drop cloths underneath outdoor painting, scraping, and sandblasting work, and properly dispose of materials in the trash. ■ Use a ground cloth or oversized tub for mixing paint and cleaning tools. ■ Use a damp mop or broom to clean floors. ■ Cover dumpsters to keep insects, animals, rainwater and sand from entering. Keep the area around the dumpster clear of trash and debris. Do not overfill the dumpster. 11 Do not dump any toxic substance or liquid waste on the pavement, the ground, or near a storm drain. Even materials that seem harmless such as latex paint or biodegradable cleaners can damage the environment. 11 Recycle paints, solvents and other materials. For more information about recycling and collection centers, visit www.oclandfills.com. 11 Store materials indoors or Linder cover and away from storm drains. 11 Use a construction and demolition recycling company to recycle lumber, paper, cardboard, metals, masonry, carpet, plastic, pipes, drywall, rocks, dirt, and green waste. For a listing of construction and demolition recycling locations in your area, visit www.ciwmb.ca.gov/recycle. 11 Properly label materials. Familiarize employees with Material "TmrTl�m* Safety Data Sheets. rJ03Wlork P R E V E N T 1 *IN be 9 For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com UCCE Master Gardener Hotline: (714) 708-1646 To report a spill, call the Orange County 24 -Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1 -877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) . For emergencies, dial 911. I'hc tins contained in this brochure provide usefi_il information to help prevent water pollution xv I I ilc larldsC aping c»_ gardening. 11 you have other suggestions. please contact vour citv's stormtvater representatives or call the orange Count, stormwatc r Program. �s Primcd on Receded Paper :��` The �4 Ocean B�e,< . at Your Front Doo. P R O J E C' PaILJ_100 PREVENTI0ivj 13 Never allow gardening products or polluted water to enter the street, gutter or storm drain. General LandscapingTips ■ Protect stockpiles and materials from wind and rain by storing them under tarps or secured plastic sheeting. ■Prevent erosion of slopes by planting fast-growing, dense ground covering plants. These will shield and bind the soil. ■Plant native vegetation to reduce the amount of water, fertilizers, and pesticide applied to the landscape. 4. mod p r. �. ■Never apply pesticides x, ' or fertilizers when rain is predicted within the next 48 hours. Garden & Lawn Maintenance ■Do not overwater. Use irrigation practices such as drip irrigation, soaker hoses or micro spray systems. Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers. ■ Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain. Instead, dispose of green waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or recycling it through your city's program. ■ Use slow-release fertilizers to minimize leaching, and use organic fertilizers. ■ Read labels and use only as directed. Do not over -apply pesticides or fertilizers. Apply to spots as needed, rather than blanketing an entire area. ■ Store pesticides, fertilizers and other chemicals in a dry covered area to prevent exposure that may result in the deterioration of containers and packaging. ■ Rinse empty pesticide containers and re -use rinse water as you would use the product. Do not dump rinse water down storm drains. Dispose of empty containers in the trash. III When available, use non-toxic alternatives to traditional pesticides, and use pesticides specifically designed to control the pest you are targeting. For more information, visit www.ipm.ucdavis.edu. III If fertilizer is spilled, sweep up the spill before irrigating. If the spill is liquid, apply an absorbent material such as cat litter, and then sweep it up and dispose of it in the trash. 11 Take unwanted pesticides to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center to be recycled. Locations are provided below. uea30 alp pup u!ejp wiots aill sag3eaj n ajojaq uonnllod dots dlaq Ipm sleuarew jo Iesodsip pup asn jadOJd 'uonnllod jjounj uegm a3npaa pue AUlvub .rates, 3Aojdwl of pap33u st sassaulsnq pue sutaplsaa Axwo7 32LIE10 wo-tj uoddnS suleap wrous u!elu!pw pup Sutdwnp le2311! DIU`JIISaAnl 'walsds utwp wants 3111 wUouna aouuow'Algenb aalem loatoad o1 3ggnd ago a2e3nont3 pue alunpa 01A1n10D Aupao tnol2no3tp padolanap uaaq 3Ae11 sweAoad ltlaw32euew A7llvtb jalemw.tolS -s,(eq pue s.togae11 's3113eaq se 113113 sea3p u0ne3taat apeAap Cele uU,(agj, slpuge11 puepam lure letseoa se Ilan, sv ajg artaew waeg uea wats,(s r!e.tp wants 3111 woaj stuetnllod 'AnwoJ 3;Iue1O u! Aulenb tares, ro pedwt snouas a .q�. aseg uea uonnllod aaanos unod- LIN ImaOp dIjj un;.l,�<�d .)ILL California Environmental Protection Agency www.calepa.ca.gov • Air Resources Board 1v.arb.ca.gou • Department of Pesticide Regulation www.ccdpcca.gov • Department of Toxic Substances Control www.dtsc.ca.gov • Integrated Waste Management Board . i—ib.ca.gov • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment i—oehha.ca.gov • State Water Resources Control Board w,nv.waterboarcls.—gov Earth 911-Cotuntunity Specific Environmental Information IS00<leauup or visit www. 1800cleanup. org Health Care Agency's Ocean and Bay Water Closure and Posting Ilotline (714) 43%-6400 or visit v—ocbeachinforcom Integrated Waste Management Dept. of Orange County (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandhlls.cont for information on household hazardous waste collection centers, recycling centers and solid waste collection O.C. Agriculture Commissioner (714) 447-7100 or visit www.ocagcon—com Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook Visit www.cabntphandbooks.com UC Master Gardener IIodine (714) 7081646 or visit—rccemg.com The Orange County Stormwater Program has created and moderates an electronic mailing list to facilitate ,oinnuarications, take questions and exchange ideas among it, user,, about issues and topics related to stormwater and urban runoff and the implementation of program elements. Tojoirt the list, pleas end an mail m ocsmnmvatcri n kj Cin �liso.ocwa Iersh ed.com 'sa3ejnts paAed pue siol &tispud no suivls 1100 33uew 31ue510 131110 pue'alsem lewltte'Sulddg3 ume1'33JU-I0 'sanlAn3e uo!pnatsu03 pup, advaspuel woaj st.tgap lsup pup. uotsoaa IloS■ 'saanow33 tried pue nued'stauvap j0lesodsip jado.idug■ sw 3j pue suapae�J 'sumel wo-g saazgn33j pue sapunsadN 'sant pue Supuld lrout 'lsna 'luivd pa.taglpam `1sne11xa al3!gak in punoj stela"" sptnlj audua 1-110 pup po pasn jo Irsodsip jado.tdwj� 'sleds pue sa)eal 3AnowoinVo uOljnjjnd A II( S' {l1!0d-u0jVfo NdJJII05 Aliso V jo. - - _ . . .. (949) 4262535 Anaheim Public Works Operations _ ... (714) 765-61860 Brca Engineering. .. (714) 990.7666 Buena Park Public Works - .. .. (714) 562-3655 Costa Mesa Public Services _ _ .. (714) 754-5323 Cypress Public Work. .. .. - .. _ .(714) 229-6740 Dana Point Public Work _ .. _ _ _ _ (949) 248-:3584 Ranuato Valley Puhlic W -L, _ . (7141 59311441 Fullerton Engineering D,pe (714) 73846853 Garden (:r—e Public Warks .. .. (714) 741-5956 Huntington Beach Pubhe Warks _ (714) 53G5431 Irvine Public Works.. _ . . - . _ (949) 7246'115 La naha Pubhe Services. . - . .. (562) 9051)792 I., Palma Public Works. .. .. - - .(714) 690.3310 Laguna 8-111 Water Quality- . .. ... .. . (949) 497-0378 Lagtmu Hills Public S,rviccs- - . . .. .. (949) 707-2650 I.ab ma Niguel Public Works .. . (949) 362-4337 Laguna Wood Public Work.. .. _ _ (949) 639-0500 Lake Forest Public Warks .. _ _ . (949) 461-3480 Los Alamitos Community D- _ _ _ ... (562) 431-35:38 Mission\wju Puhlic Works _ .. .. (949) 470-30511 Newport Beach, Code & Water Quality Ent orcemenl. .... _ .. _ _ (949) 6443215 Orange Public Work. .. _ _ . _ (714) 532-6480 Placcnua Puhlic Wu k _ ...(714) 993-8245 Rancho Sense M.trg ' Lia .. _ .. _ (949) 635-1800 San Clement, Euuuonmental Programs ... _ . (949) 361-6143 San Juan Capistrano Engineering. -(949) 2344413 Santa Ana Public Work .. _ .. _ .. .(714) 647-:3380 Seal Beach Engineering . .. . _ . .. .. _ . (562) 431-2527 s317 Sr noon Public Works ...... ..... ... . (714) 379-9222 x204 Tustin Public Work/Engineering.... ... .. (714) 57431511 Villa Park Engineering . .. .. .. . .... .. (714) 998-1:500 Westminster Puhli, Work/Engineering ... . (714) 898-3311 x446 Yorba Linda Engineering . . ... .. (714) 911 1-7138 Orange County St.ou—oer Pmgeon ..... .. (877) 897-7455 Oange County 24 -flour W':uer Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1877 -89 -SPILL (1-877-897-7455) On-line Water Pollution Problem Reporting Form \\ 4\ V1- _ LJ C t' 't I c f S )t t (I _S c tt 111 -s.<emialem Ano 3rualua a.tojaq pawa3t unit S! su!ejp runts u! Jim ki , (slapot ao sluts wo.t_j) saastas A-tenues u! aalpm o1qun swalsAs.lamas d-1e1!ues mo woaj zqe Eclas aae sulpip waolSo 'su!e.tp WILLIS Out! sleuatew puas Lisp: uea ule.t ao asoq uapae2 a wo{j a3irm apig F'■ -sulprp waozs otou pagsem jo umolq oq uea — siaueal3 pup stazquaaj 'sapupsad'ruled'1!o aolout )I!l— sassaulsnq pup s3pnlan'sawcul ap!sluo asn am 5u!gtAL VN j0' 11 VdO(l a ld tj," su!E1p 000JS ons sluempod uegnt ragio pue s2uldd!p umel 'gsvt sau.te3 sa3mos aaglo pup, 8w11sem aplga%'uone,4uIt wotj asn aalem 3Atss33xa uagm ILI,( acp jo awn Auu uaddeq uea jjounj uega fj■ 'dem aq1 �uole slueuglod do �rg3td 'adEmpuel uegm 3ql asuu of iii eA, jo sawnloA 351e1 asilP.a SUIU-1 uagAN 'llejutea woaj stpts3L.IJoun.1 ratpmu-101S■ 'uonnllod jjouna uegm pue aatemwaols :uonnllod a3ntos nuod-uou.JO sad,(, oml a.te a.lagd,E uonnllod ,jjntos uuod-uou„ pape3 sautuawos s! uonnllod jo 3dl still, -stol 2tu'laed pue salts twn311a1suoa'sp00q.1oggSiau 'staa.ns Alla woaj sawo3 uonnllod a3uem jo a3tnos tsa23el 3111 `t3ej til stueld wawleaat aXemas pue s3nLi13eJ se fists s33.mos 3gnads woaj sautoo suzut uegan r! r0nnpod a3test jo a3jnos lsa2ael 3117 legs ana!laq aldoad isoWS d tnOlIN 110,( P!G It y0 1 1 0 � WIC) 1 V 1 N r 1[ Follow these simple steps to help reduce water pollution: Household Activities ■ Do not rinse spills with water. Use dry cleanup methods such as applying cat litter or another absorbent material, sweep and dispose of in the trash.'Fakc items such as used or excess batteries, oven cleaners, automotive fluids, painting products and cathode ray tubes, like 'I'Vs and computer monitors, to a household Flazardous Waste Collection Center (111 WCC). ■ For a 111-IWCC near you call +- I 11, n': t t r „-'; ' or visit „"— ,„ LuiJ Celt.., �"i'. ■ Do not hose down your driveway, sidewalk or patio to the street, gutter or storm drain. Sweep up debris and dispose of it in the trash. Autionotivc ■'Fake your vehicle to a commercial car wash whenever possible If you wash your vehicle at home, choose soaps, cleaners, or detergents labeled non-toxic, phosphate- free or biodegradable. Vegetable and citrus -based products are typically safest for the environment. ■ Do not allow washwater from vehicle washing to drain into the street, gutter or storm drain. Excess washwater should be disposed of in the sanitary sewer (through a sink or toilet) or onto an absorbent surface like your lawn. ■ Monitor your vehicles for leaks and place a pan under leaks. Keep your vehicles well maintained to stop and prevent leaks. ■:Never pour oil or antifreeze in the street, gutter or storm drain. Recycle these Substances at a service station, a waste oil collection center or used oil recycling center. For the nearest Used Oil Collection Center call 1 sou -r I I P or visit„..., 111 ,1, ., Pool Maintenance ■ Pool and spa water must be dechlorinated and free of excess acid, alkali or color to be allowed in the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ When it is not raining, drain dechlorinated pool and spa water directly into the sanitary server. ■Some cities may have ordinances that do not allow pool water to be disposed of in the storm drain. Check with your city. Laodccape and Gardening ■ Do not over -water. Water your lawn and garden by hand to control the amount of water you use or set it systems to reflect seasonal water needs. If water flows off your yanl onto your driveway or sidewalk, your system is over -watering. Periodically inspect and fix leaks and miscluccied sprinklers. ■ Do not take or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain. Instead, dispose of waste by composting, hauling it to a penniucd landfill, or as green waste through your city's recycling program. ■ Follow directions on pesticides and fertilizer, (measure, do not estimate amounts) and do not use if rain is predicted within 48 hours. ■ Take unwanted pesticides to a f II IWCC to be recycled. For locations and hours of 111 IWCC, call (' I I � I "T� , or visit,"" ,,, ! ' 11111..,...... Trash ■ Place wash and litter that cannot he reryrled in securely covered trash cans. ■ Whenever possible, buy recycled products. ■ Remember: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. Pet Care ■ Always pick up after your pct. Flush waste down the toilet m dispose of it in the trash. Pet waste, if left outdoors, can wash into the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ If possible, bathe your pets indents. If you must bathe your pct outside, wash it on your lawn or another absorbent/permeable surface to keep the washwater from entering the street, gutter or storm drain. ■ Follow directions for use of pet care products and dispose of any unused products at a FIFIWCC. Attachment E TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) dHsc= inches 2 (Worksheet A) Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm dremainder—_ Inches 3 depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 - Line 2) Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A acres A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= 0.75 x imp + 0.15 C Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x _ Vdesign— CU -ft 41/12 Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate Enter measured infiltration rate, Kobserved (in/hr) Kobserved— _ In/hr 1 (Appendix Vlt) Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Stotat Stotai- 2 unitless 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesi n = Kobservedl Srorai Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= Hours Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within = feet 5 the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesi n x Tx 1112 max Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Amin= sq -ft 6 Vde., n/ dmax 'Kob-,ped is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Kobs—ed See Appendix VII. III -16 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) (Worksheet A) dHsc= inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainr (inches) (Line 1 - Line 2) de dremainder—_ inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 r _.__ r,_-:_-• _ •.-'--•-._--._ ,_, CI ILC[ rIU UUL dl ea Ll WULdt Lo BMP 5 , A (acres) A= acres - - - - 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x 1/12 _ Vdesi9n- cu -ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kobserved (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kobserved-_ In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Stotal unitless Slotai_ 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, K = K /S desi n observed total Kdesgn= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kaesi n x Tx 1112 �max= feet 6 1 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Vdesi r✓dmax Amin= sq -ft Kobserved is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Kobserved. See Appendix VII. III -16 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) dHsc= inches 2 (Worksheet A) Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm dremainder—_ inches 3 depth, drentuinaer (inches) (Line 1 - Line 2) Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A acres A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, (unitless) imp= 3 -imp Calculate runoff coefficient, C= 0.75 x imp + 0.15 C Calculate runoff volume, Vaesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x _ Vdesign— CU -ft 4 1/12 Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate Enter measured infiltration rate, Kobserved (in/hr) Kobserved-_ In/hr 1 (Appendix V1I) Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Stota, Stotai- 2 unitless 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, K = K /S desi n observed total Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= Hours Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within feet 5 the drawdown time feet), Dmax = Kdesi n x T x (1112)�max= Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Amin= sq -ft 6 Vdesi n/dmax Kobserved is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Kobserved. See Appendix VII. III -16 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) (Worksheet A) - dHsc- inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 - Line 2) dremainder—_ inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributar to BMP "s, A "acres A= nrrcc 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, im unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= 0.75 x imp + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x 1/12 Vdesi9n_- cu -ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kobserved (in/hr) (Appendix V1 I) _ Kobserved- In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Stota, unitless Stotai= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesin = Kobserved total /S Kdesi9n= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time feet), Dmax = Kdesi n x Tx (1112)max— p _ feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Vdesi r✓dmax Amin= sq -ft 'Kobserved is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Kobserved. See Appendix VII. III -16 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) dHsc= inches 2 (Worksheet A) Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm dremainder—_ inches 3 depth/ dremainder (inches) (Line 1 - Line 2) Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A acres A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= 0.75 x imp + 0.15 C= Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x _ Vdesign— CU -ft 4 1/12 Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate Enter measured infiltration rate, Kobserved (in/hr) i,� Kobserved= In/hr 1 (Appendix VII) Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Stota, Stotai- 2 unitless 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesi n = Kobserved total /S Kdeslgn= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= Hours Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within �max= feet 5 the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesi n x T x 1112 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Amin= sq -ft 6 Vdesi r✓dmax 'Keb,,,.d is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Kubs ed. See Appendix VII. III -16 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, of (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) (Worksheet A) dHsc= inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dreniain&,, (inches) (Line 1 - Line 2) dremainder—_ inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Eiaei Project area tributaryto BMP 's, A 'acres A= arse, 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x 1/12 _ Vdesign- cu -ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kobservaa (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kobserved= In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Stotal unitless Stotai_ 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, K = K /S desi n observed total Kdes;gn= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kaesi n x Tx 1112 _ �max— feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Vdesi r✓ dmax Amin= sq -ft 'Kob —d is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Kobse d. See Appendix VII. III -16 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure IIIA, d (inches) d= inches Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) dHsc= inches 2 (Worksheet A) Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm dremainder—_ inches 3 depth, drenainaer (inches) (Line 1 - Line 2) Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A acres A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp unitless imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= 0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x _ Vdesign– CU -ft 4 1/12 Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate Enter measured infiltration rate, Kobserved (in/hr) Kobserved= In/hr 1 (Appendix V 11) Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Stota, Stotai_ 2 unitless 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesin = Kobserved total /S Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= Hours Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within _ Amax feet 5 the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesi n x T x 1112 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Amin= sq -ft 6 Vdesi r/ dma., 'Kob—d is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Kober ed- See Appendix VII. III -16 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure IIl.1, d (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) (Worksheet A) - dHsc- inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 - Line 2) dremainder—_ Inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV i �_. _ r,-_:__. _ ._:�..�__..._ .,..� ,_ _ _ -_ -, �inCi ric cci area uwuLai w BMP s , H acres A= acres - -- 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= 0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x 1/12 Vdesign—_ cu -ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kobserved (in/hr) (Appendix VII) — Kbbserved- In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Stotal unitless Stotai_ 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesin bserved total = K 1S o Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesi n x T x 1112 p _ max— feet 6 1 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Vdesi r✓ dmax Amin= sq -ft Kobs—ed is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Koberyed. See Appendix VII. III -16 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHsc (inches) dHsc= inches 2 (Worksheet A) Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm dremainder—_ Inches 3 depth, dremain&,, (inches) (Line 1 - Line 2) Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A acres A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= 0.75 x imp + 0.15 C Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign— (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x Vdesign— cu -ft 4 1/12 Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate Enter measured infiltration rate, Kobservea (in/hr) Kobserved= In/hr 1 (Appendix VII) Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Stotal Stotai- 2 unitless 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesin = Kobserved / Stotal Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T max 48 hours T= Hours Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within �max= feet 5 the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesi n x Tx 1112 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq -ft), Amin = Amin= sq -ft 6 Vdesi r✓dmax Kob-led is the vertical infiltration measured in the field, before applying a factor of safety. If field testing measures a rate that is different than the vertical infiltration rate (for example, three-dimensional borehole percolation rate), then this rate must be adjusted by an acceptable method (for example, Porchet method) to yield the field estimate of vertical infiltration rate, Kobery.d. See Appendix VII. III -16 December 20, 2013 TI`Uf" I... IN 1 I f" A I f� f ffr'1 AN iff' r'���r t 4rxrrr• I u�t 1041%._t1L hV1LJ!-11VLG LJUI_UIVIMN L Hl'1"�1V V1L�� Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Rate and Worksheet Note: The minimum combined adjustment factor shall not be less than 2.0 and the maximum combined adjustment factor shall not exceed 9.0. VII -35 December 20, 2013 Assigned Factor Product (p) Factor Category Factor Description Weight (w) Value (v) p = w x v I I Soil assessment methods 0.25, Predominant soil texture 0.25 , A Suitability Site soil variability 0.25 • ' -' Assessment Depth to groundwater / impervious layer 0.25 Suitability Assessment Safety Factor, SA = EP J J Tributary area size 0.25 Level of pretreatment/ expected sediment loads 0.25 B Design Redundancy 0.25 J Compaction during construction 0.25 2 - Design Safety Factor, SB = Ep ? r Combined Safety Factor, STotal= SAX SB t Observed Infiltration Rate, inch/hr, KobseNed (corrected for test -specific bias) --- Design Infiltration Rate, in/hr, KDESIGN = KObserved / STotal SupportingData Briefly describe infiltration test and provide reference to test forms: 1 Note: The minimum combined adjustment factor shall not be less than 2.0 and the maximum combined adjustment factor shall not exceed 9.0. VII -35 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES INF -7: Underground Infiltration Underground infiltration is a vault or chamber with an open bottom that used to store runoff and percolate into the subsurface. A number of vendors offer proprietary infiltration products that allow for similar or enhanced rates of infiltration and subsurface storage while offering durable prefrabricated structures. There are many varieties of proprietary infiltration BMPs that can be used for roads and parking lots, parks and open spaces, single and multi -family residential, or mixed-use and commercial uses. Feasibility Screening Considerations • Infiltration bains shall pass infeasible screening criteria to be considered for use. ➢ Infiltration vault ➢ Recharge vault x r. W Underground Infiltration Source: http://www.contech-cpi.com • Underground infiltration galleries pose a potential risk of groundwater contamination; pretreatment should be used. Opportunity Criteria • Soils are adequate for infiltration or can be amended to provide an adequate infiltration rate. • Appropriate for sites with limited surface space. • Can be placed beneath roads, parking lots, parks, and athletic fields. • Potential for groundwater contamination can be mitigated through isolation of pollutant sources, pretreatment of inflow, and/or demonstration of adequate treatment capacity of underlying soils. • Infiltration is into native soil, or depth of engineered fill is s 5 feet from the bottom of the facility to native material and infiltration into fill is approved by a geotechnical professional. • Tributary area land uses include mixed-use and commercial, sngle-family and multi -family, roads and parking lots, and parks and open spaces. High pollutant land uses should not be tributary to infiltration BMPs. OC -Specific Design Criteria and Considerations Placement of BMPs should observe geotechnical recommendations with respect to geological hazards (e.g. landslides, liquefaction zones, erosion, etc.) and set -backs (e.g., foundations, utilities, roadways, etc.) ® Minimum separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater of 10 feet shall be observed. Minimum pretreatment should be provided upstream of the infiltration facility, and water bypassing pretreatment should not be directed to the facility. ® Underground infiltration should not be used for drainage areas with high sediment production potential unless preceded by full treatment control with a BMP effective for sediment removal. Design infiltration rate should be determined as described in Appendix VII. Inspection ports or similar design features shall be provided to verify continued system performance and identify need for major maintenance. XIV -43 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL ICAL la'lJllllll'VCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES For infiltration facilities beneath roads and parking areas, structural requirements should meet H-20 load requirements. Computing Underground Infiltration Device Size Underground infiltration devices vary by design and by proprietary designs. The sizing method selected for use must be based on the BMP type it most strongly resembles. • For underground infiltration devices with open pore volume (e.g., vaults, crates, pipe sections, etc), sizing will be most similar to infiltration basins. • For underground infiltration devices with pore space (e.g., aggregate reservoirs), sizing will be most similar to permeable pavement. Additional References for Design Guidance Los Anneles Unified Crhnr l Ngtrirt M Al pqm .qtnrmwatar Tarhniral Manual ('.hantar .r- http_ f/www.laschools.ogVeinployee%designlfs-studies-and- re rts[dawnliladlwhite pa r_�ep rt_ntaterial/Storm Water Technical Manual 2009 _ovt- red.pdt'version id -76975850 XIV -44 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet I: Summary of Groundwater -related Feasibility Criteria 1 Is project large or small? (as defined by Table VIII.2) Large Ca Small circle one - 2 What is the tributary area to the BMP? ..�..._____ A 2 �y acres 1 3 What type of BMP is proposed?:, `r 4 What is the infiltrating surface area of the proposed BMP? ABMP I i Q sq -ft What land use activities are present in the tributary area (list all) - �Coe0.„cC! Its 5 'Pa vee3 �a� IC;h fdt 6 What land use -based risk category is applicable? l `l M 1H _ E C If M or H, what pretreatment and source isolation BMPs have been considered and are proposed i (describe all): 7 What minimum separation to mounded seasonally high 1 8 groundwater applies to the proposed BMP? 5 ft 10 ft See Section VIII.2 (circle one) ---- Provide rationale for selection of applicable minimum separation to seasonally high mounded groundwater: 9 i 10 What is separation from the infiltrating surface to seasonally high groundwater? SHGWT ft 11 What is separation from the infiltrating surface to mounded Mounded I seasonally high groundwater? SHGWT ft jDescribe assumptions and methods used for mounding analysis: f 12 l 13 Is the site within a plume protection boundary (See Figure Y N/A VIII -13 December 20, 2013 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES Worksheet I: Summary of Groundwater -related Feasibility Criteria �VIII.2)? 14 Is the site within a selenium source area or other natural plume area (See Figure VIII.2)? Y N N/A 15 Is the site within 250 feet of a contaminated site? Y N/A If site-specific study has been prepared, provide citation and briefly summarize relevant findings.- 16 indings: 16 17I Is the site within 100 feet of a water supply well, spring, septic II system?___ -- 18 Is infiltration feasible on the site relative to groundwater - related criteria? Provide rationale for feasibility determination: `fi n "71 , r: Y � N/A ( Y N Note: if a single criterion or group of criteria would render infiltration infeasible, it is not necessary to evaluate every question in this worksheet. VIII -14 December 20, 2013 Attachment F D Y O D S TM Design Your Own Detention System \\I/_„T1E�"0 W �.'� CMP DETENTION SYSTEMS Header, Access Riser -- Bar els A��l%�/TCA<■� ��i ��►�:� 1i i �! CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS INC. For design assistance, drawings, and pricing send completed worksheet to: dyods@contech-cpi.com 1i Bands____ _ ,:. ^ -ae ----= Project Summa Date: 12/14/2016 Project Name: Costa Mesa Library City / County: State: Designed By: Company: Telephone: Enter Information in Blue Cells Q Pavement --- Finished Grade Elevation r r Backfill m Grade , ry - -- - , � t U L Costa Mesa California GT KPFF 310 665-1540 Corrugated Metal Pipe Calculator Storage Volume Required (cf): 7,950 Limiting Width (ft): Effective Depth Below Asphalt (ft): 30.00 0 9.00 Solid or Perforated Pipe: Shape Or Diameter: 50.27 ft2 Pipe Area Su 9cin9 Diameter Spacing w Perforated 96 3.00 Spacing between Barrels (ft): Stone Width Around Perimeter of System (ft): 0 Depth A: Porous Stone Above Pipe (in): 12 Depth C: Porous Stone Below Pipe (in): ! -- ----.---- - :' r 12 Stone Porosity (0 to 40%): 120 System Sizing Use Custom Layout (at right) for layout adjustment Custom Layout To adjust layout, enter desired barrel length in the light blue boxes below. Pipe Storage: 6,786 cf Porous Stone Storage: 1,343 cf Excess Footage = 0 Total Storage Provided: 8,129 cf 102.2% Of Required Storage Number of Barrels: 3 barrels Barrel 12 0 0 Length Per Barrel: 45.00 ft Barrel 11 0 0 Rectangular Footprint (W x L): 30. ft x 45. ft Barrel 10 0 0 Barrel Barrel 8 Barrel 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 CONTECH Materials Total CMP Footage: 135 ft Approximate Total Pieces: 6 pcs Barrel 6 0 0 Approximate Coupling Bands: 3 bands Barrel 5 0 0 Approximate Truckloads: 3 trucks Barrel 4 Barrel 3 Barrel 2 0 45 45H= 0 Construction Quantities" Total Excavation: 450 cy Porous Stone Backfill For Storage: 249 cy Stone Barrel 1 45 Backfill to Grade Excluding Stone: -50 cy Fill 0 10 20 30 40 50 —Construction quantities are approximate and should be verified upon final design 0 20.. t;ONTECH Stormwater Solutions TRAYLOR, MARIAN Subject: FW: For Council & Commissioners ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS From: cmash.oc@gmail.com [mailto:cmash.oc mail.coml On Behalf Of Charlene Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 9:09 AM To: GREEN, BRENDA<brenda.green@costamesaca.gov> Subject: For Council & Commissioners RE: City Council, Planning & Parks & Recreation Commission Special Joint Meeting Dear Mavor Foley, Members of the City Council and Commissioners As a library patron, volunteer, Friend of the Libraries, and advocate for my city-, I write to support and celebrate the Master Plan for the Lions Parr Project. Long time residents have come to know this park, the NCC and Dungan Library. We have seen it thrive NN ith events, families and daily use. We have seen it change over the years. Before you is a plan whose time has come! To paraphrase author, speaker, motivator Simon Sinek, mo\°ing forward i ith this project we are now able to tall: about the completion of Lions Park and its exciting elements 16th such clarity-, as if the are talking about the past. Picture a revitalized downtmvii! Residents of the Westside (including the 3 -story work lire units) are enjoying a stroll in "their" park. The diversity that is Costa Mesa is coming together experiencing music, books, the arts, a coffee! Parents and children, teens and friends, adults are gathering for programs and opportunities to celebrate all the this community is. Meetings and events are taking place in an event space that is open, inciting and full of energy. The effects of this project will have more than a ripple. It -will provide a "wave" that spills out into the Triangle, surrounding neighborhoods, the business community and our schools and universities. Having been an interested part- in the library- project for 15 years, I am excited to see visionazl_- leadership, community building and the celebration of re -,vitalization in action! Thank you, Charlene Ashendorf Error! Filename not spec ified. about. melcmash .oc