HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 - PH-2 - Code Enforcement CO-17-04 to Amend Secti - 8/1/2017CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: AUGUST 1, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: PH -2
SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENT CO -17-04 TO AMEND SECTIONS OF TITLE 13 OF THE COSTA
MESA MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING, ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT), RELATING
TO APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND NOTICING FOR PUBLIC
HEARINGS
DATE: JULY 28, 2017
FROM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION BY: SHERI VANDER DUSSEN, CONSULTANT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheri Vander Dussen, AICP (714) 754-5617
sheri.vanderdussen@costamesaca.gov
RECOMMENDATION
Introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 17 -XX adopting Code Amendment CO -17-04 to
modify the submittal requirements for all discretionary applications, and expand the notice
provided for public hearings held by the Planning Commission and City Council.
BACKGROUND
In its meeting of June 12, 2017, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (with one
commissioner absent) to recommend that the City Council adopt this code amendment.
ANALYSIS
The City Council adopted Ordinance 17-05 at its meeting of May 2, 2017. Among other
changes, this ordinance requires the City to provide notice of hearings regarding Special
Use Permits (SUPs) to owners and occupants of properties within 500 feet of the subject
site. The ordinance also requires certain additional information to be submitted as part
of group home applications. Staff believes it is important for submittal and noticing
requirements to be consistent for all discretionary applications and has initiated this code
amendment as a result. Staff informed the City Council of its intentions to process this
Zoning Code amendment during the May 2, 2017 Council meeting.
The following changes to Section 13-29 of the Zoning Code are proposed.
Application Submittal Requirements
The zoning code details information that must be submitted with a discretionary land use
application. These applications include Special Use Permits (SUPs), Conditional Use
Permits (CUPs), Master Plans, and other land use requests. The Code specifies that
applications shall be signed by the owner of the property and shall be accompanied by
other information as required by the Planning Division.
The City Council imposed additional submittal requirements on applications for SUPs and
CUPs for group homes and licensed treatment facilities in residential zones. Staff
believes it is appropriate to obtain this information from all applicants, and proposes to
add the following submittal requirements to Section 13-29(a):
(3) If the applicant and/or operator is a partnership, corporation, firm or
association, then the applicant/operator shall provide the additional names and
addresses as follows and such persons shall also sign the application:
a. Every general partner of the partnership;
b. Every owner with a controlling interest in the corporation;
c. The person designated by the officers of a corporation as set forth in a
resolution of the corporation that is to be designated as the permit holder
(4) The applicant shall describe the license and permit history of the applicant(s),
including whether such applicant(s), in previously operating a similar use in this or
another city, county or state under license and/or permit, has had such license
and/or permit revoked or suspended, and the reason therefore.
This information on permit history will be particularly helpful when applications are
submitted for business types with the potential to create impacts on the surrounding
neighborhood, such as a nightclub.
Public Notice Requirements
Section 13-29(d) of the Zoning Code specifies that notice of public hearings before the
Planning Commission and City Council on zoning matters shall be provided as follows:
• Mailed notice shall be provided to all owners of property within 500 feet of the
project property
• A notice shall be posted on each street frontage of the project site
• Notice shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation
The proposed revisions would amend the requirements for mailed notices to also include
occupants of properties within 500 feet of the subject property.
This modification will ensure that anyone living or conducting business in the vicinity of a
project site will be made aware of an upcoming hearing. This change will significantly
impact the expense incurred by the City to provide notice of hearings as the number of
notices sent will be greater, especially when an apartment building or multi -tenant office,
retail or industrial building falls within the noticing area.
In most cases, state law requires notice to all owners of property within 300 feet of the
subject property. See Government Code § 65091(a). However, the City may provide
greater than the minimum required notice. See Government Code § 65091(c).
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The ordinance has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), the CEQA guidelines, and the City's environmental procedures, and has been
found to be exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule) of CEQA because there
is no possibility that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Code will have a significant
effect on the environment.
LEGAL REVIEW
The draft ordinance has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney's
Office.
PUBLIC NOTICE
A quarter -page ad noticing this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot on July 21, 2017
pursuant to Section 13-29(d) of the CMMC. No other notice was required.
CONCLUSION
The proposed amendment will require greater disclosure from corporations submitting
applications for discretionary land use decisions, as well as history on operation of similar
uses in this or other jurisdictions. Mailing public hearing notices to occupants will ensure
that everyone living or conducting business near a property that is the subject of a public
hearing will have the opportunity to become informed about the application and participate
in the decision-making process.
SHERI VANDER DUSSEN, AICP
Consultant
BARRY CURTIS, AICP
Director of Economic
Development Services
Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance — Revisions Depicted
2. Draft Ordinance — Clean Version
3. Excerpt of the minutes of the Planning
Commission meeting of June 12, 2017
and
ATTACHMENT 1
REVISIONS DEPICTED
ORDINANCE NO. 17 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA ADOPTING ZONING CODE
AMENDMENT CO -17 -XX AMENDING SECTION 13-
29 OF CHAPTER III (PLANNING APPLICATIONS),
OF TITLE 13 (PLANNING, ZONING AND
DEVELOPMENT) OF THE COSTA MESA
MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA MAKES THE FOLLOWING
FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE:
WHEREAS, City of Costa Mesa places a high value on public participation
by those residents affected by project approvals, that the existing requirements for
notification of property owners only within a five hundred -foot radius does not
provide notice to non -owner residents and therefore does not maximize the
opportunity for public participation, and that public participation will be enhanced
by providing notice to all affected residents, both property owners and renters alike;
WHEREAS, disclosure of all principals involved in an application promotes
greater transparency and accountability in project approvals, will allow the public
and the decision makers to fully understand who will be responsible for
implementing the project and allows the city to conduct background checks of all
owners and officers when said checks are required by ordinance;
WHEREAS, understanding the applicant's history of operating similar uses
in this or other jurisdictions will allow the approving body to more fully evaluate the
application and determine the appropriate conditions of approval to be imposed, if
any, and will help promote greater transparency and accountability in project
approvals; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been reviewed for compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA guidelines, and the City's
environmental procedures, and has been found to be exempt pursuant to Section
15061 (b)(3) (General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the City Council
hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
passage of this Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1:Sub-sections (a) (Application) and (d) (Public notice) of Section 13-29
of Chapter III (Planning Applications) of Title 13 (Planning, Zoning and
Development) are hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 13-29. - Planning application review process.
(a) Application.
(1) Application for any planning application shall be made to the planning
division on the forms provided. Plans and information reasonably needed
to analyze the application may be required. A list of required plans and
information shall be available from the planning division.
(2) All applications shall be signed by the record owner of the real
property to be affected. This requirement may be waived upon
presentation of evidence substantiating the right of another person to file
the application.
(3) If the application is for a conditional use permit, minor conditional use
permit, special use permit, master plan, specific plan, rezone, general plan
amendment, tentative map, or density bonus and the operator is a
partnership, corporation, firm or association, then the applicant/operator
shall provide the additional names and addresses as follows and such
persons shall also sign the application:
a. every general partner of the partnership;
b. every owner with a controlling interest in the corporation;
c. the person designated by the officers of a corporation as set
forth in a resolution of the corporation that is to be
designated as the permit holder.
(4) If the application is for a conditional use permit, minor conditional use
permit, or special use permit, the applicant shall describe the license and
permit history of the applicant(s), including whether such applicant(s), in
previously operating a similar use in this or another city, county or state
under license and/or permit, has had such license and/or permit revoked or
suspended, and the reason therefore.
(d) Public notice. When required pursuant to Table 13-29(c), public notice
shall be given as described in the following subsections. Public notices shall
contain a general explanation of the proposed planning application and any
other information reasonably needed to give adequate notice of the matter to
be considered.
(1) Mailed notice required. Notices of the hearing shall be mailed to all
property owners and occupants within a five hundred -foot radius of the
project site, except for applications for the construction of a building(s)
one hundred fifty (150) feet or more in height; these applications shall
require a greater notice radius:
Building Height in Feet
Notice Requirement
More than 150 and less than or equal to 225
700 -foot radius
More than 225 and less than or equal to 300
900 -foot radius
More than 300
1,100 -foot radius
a. The required notice radius shall be measured from the external
boundaries of the property described in the application. The notice shall
be mailed no less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing or determination
on the application. The planning division shall require for this purpose the
use of the last known name and address of such owner(s) as shown on
the last equalized county assessment roll or by a more current listing.
(2) On-site posting required. Additional notice shall be provided by
posting a notice on each street frontage of the project site, no less than
ten (10) days prior to the date set for the hearing or determination on the
application.
(3) Newspaper publication. When a public hearing is required, notice
shall also be published once in the city in a newspaper of general
circulation, no less than ten (10) days prior to the date set for the public
hearing.
Section 2: Inconsistencies. Any provision of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code or
appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent
of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent
necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.
Section 3:Severability. If any chapter, article, section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application
thereof to any person, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or its application to other
persons. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each chapter, article, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase, word, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or
more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of the
application thereof to any person, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. No
portion of this Ordinance shall supersede any local, state, or federal law,
regulation, or codes dealing with life safety factors.
Section 4: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force
thirty (30) days from and after the passage thereof, and prior to the expiration of
fifteen (15) days from its passage shall be published once in the ORANGE COAST
DAILY PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City
of Costa Mesa or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a
summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk five (5) days prior to the date of adoption
of this Ordinance, and within fifteen (15) days after adoption, the City Clerk shall
cause to be published the aforementioned summary and shall post in the office of
the City Clerk a certified copy of this Ordinance together with the names and
member of the City Council voting for and against the same.
Adopted this _ day of _, 2017
Katrina Foley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green
City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF COSTA MESA )
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at the regular meeting
of the City Council held on the day of , 2017, and thereafter at the
regular meeting of said City Council duly held on the day of , 2017,
was duly passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Brenda Green
City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
ATTACHMENT 2
ORDINANCE NO. 17 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA ADOPTING ZONING CODE
AMENDMENT CO -17 -XX AMENDING SECTION 13-
29 OF CHAPTER III (PLANNING APPLICATIONS),
OF TITLE 13 (PLANNING, ZONING AND
DEVELOPMENT) OF THE COSTA MESA
MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA MAKES THE FOLLOWING
FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE:
WHEREAS, City of Costa Mesa places a high value on public participation
by those residents affected by project approvals, that the existing requirements for
notification of property owners only within a five hundred -foot radius does not
provide notice to non -owner residents and therefore does not maximize the
opportunity for public participation, and that public participation will be enhanced
by providing notice to all affected residents, both property owners and renters alike;
WHEREAS, disclosure of all principals involved in an application promotes
greater transparency and accountability in project approvals, will allow the public
and the decision makers to fully understand who will be responsible for
implementing the project and allows the city to conduct background checks of all
owners and officers when said checks are required by ordinance;
WHEREAS, understanding the applicant's history of operating similar uses
in this or other jurisdictions will allow the approving body to more fully evaluate the
application and determine the appropriate conditions of approval to be imposed, if
any, and will help promote greater transparency and accountability in project
approvals; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been reviewed for compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA guidelines, and the City's
environmental procedures, and has been found to be exempt pursuant to Section
15061 (b)(3) (General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that the City Council
hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
passage of this Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 5:Sub-sections (a) (Application) and (d) (Public notice) of Section 13-29
of Chapter III (Planning Applications) of Title 13 (Planning, Zoning and
Development) are hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 13-29. - Planning application review process.
(a) Application.
(1) Application for any planning application shall be made to the planning
division on the forms provided. Plans and information reasonably needed
to analyze the application may be required. A list of required plans and
information shall be available from the planning division.
(2) All applications shall be signed by the record owner of the real
property to be affected. This requirement may be waived upon
presentation of evidence substantiating the right of another person to file
the application.
(3) If the application is for a conditional use permit, minor conditional use
permit, special use permit, master plan, specific plan, rezone, general plan
amendment, tentative map, or density bonus and the operator is a
partnership, corporation, firm or association, then the applicant/operator
shall provide the additional names and addresses as follows and such
persons shall also sign the application:
a. every general partner of the partnership;
b. every owner with a controlling interest in the corporation;
c. the person designated by the officers of a corporation as set
forth in a resolution of the corporation that is to be
designated as the permit holder.
(4) If the application is for a conditional use permit, minor conditional use
permit, or special use permit, the applicant shall describe the license and
permit history of the applicant(s), including whether such applicant(s), in
previously operating a similar use in this or another city, county or state
under license and/or permit, has had such license and/or permit revoked or
suspended, and the reason therefore.
(d) Public notice. When required pursuant to Table 13-29(c), public notice
shall be given as described in the following subsections. Public notices shall
contain a general explanation of the proposed planning application and any
other information reasonably needed to give adequate notice of the matter to
be considered.
(1) Mailed notice required. Notices of the hearing shall be mailed to all
property owners and occupants within a five hundred -foot radius of the
project site, except for applications for the construction of a building(s)
one hundred fifty (150) feet or more in height; these applications shall
require a greater notice radius:
Building Height in Feet
Notice Requirement
More than 150 and less than or equal to 225
700 -foot radius
More than 225 and less than or equal to 300
900 -foot radius
More than 300
1,100 -foot radius
a. The required notice radius shall be measured from the external
boundaries of the property described in the application. The notice shall
be mailed no less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing or determination
on the application. The planning division shall require for this purpose the
use of the last known name and address of such owner(s) as shown on
the last equalized county assessment roll or by a more current listing.
(2) On-site posting required. Additional notice shall be provided by
posting a notice on each street frontage of the project site, no less than
ten (10) days prior to the date set for the hearing or determination on the
application.
(3) Newspaper publication. When a public hearing is required, notice
shall also be published once in the city in a newspaper of general
circulation, no less than ten (10) days prior to the date set for the public
hearing.
Section 6: Inconsistencies. Any provision of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code or
appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent
of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent
necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.
Section 7: Severability. If any chapter, article, section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application
thereof to any person, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or its application to other
persons. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each chapter, article, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase, word, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or
more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of the
application thereof to any person, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. No
portion of this Ordinance shall supersede any local, state, or federal law,
regulation, or codes dealing with life safety factors.
Section 8: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force
thirty (30) days from and after the passage thereof, and prior to the expiration of
fifteen (15) days from its passage shall be published once in the ORANGE COAST
DAILY PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City
of Costa Mesa or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a
summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk five (5) days prior to the date of adoption
of this Ordinance, and within fifteen (15) days after adoption, the City Clerk shall
cause to be published the aforementioned summary and shall post in the office of
the City Clerk a certified copy of this Ordinance together with the names and
member of the City Council voting for and against the same.
Adopted this _ day of _, 2017
Katrina Foley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green
City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF COSTA MESA
CITY OF COSTA MESA
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at the regular meeting
of the City Council held on the day of , 2017, and thereafter at the
regular meeting of said City Council duly held on the day of , 2017,
was duly passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Brenda Green
City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
ATTACHMENT 3 -
APPROVED MINUTE EXCERPTS FROM THE
JUNE 12, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
REGARDING CO -17-04
1. CODE AMENDMENT CO -17-04: TO AMEND SECTIONS OF TITLE 13 OF THE
COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING, ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT),
RELATING TO APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND NOTICING
FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
Description: The proposed ordinance will modify the submittal requirements for all
discretionary applications. In addition, the amendment will expand the notice
provided for public hearings held by the Planning Commission and City Council.
Environmental Determination: The ordinance is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section
15061(b)(3) (General Rule).
Sheri Vander Dussen, Interim Assistant Director/Community Improvement, presented
the staff report.
Vice -Chair de Arakal and Mrs. Vander Dussen discussed Section 4 of the application
submittal requirements in the staff report.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A speaker spoke in support of the code amendment.
Vice -Chair de Arakal stated that this item was continued from the May 22, 2017 meeting.
The Vice -Chair closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Move that the Planning Commission find that the project is
categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act per Section 15061; and recommend that the City Council approve
Code Amendment CO -17-04.
Moved by Commissioner Harlan, seconded by Commissioner Kerins.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: de Arakal, Harlan, Kerins, Navarro Woods
Noes: None
Absent: Andranian
Abstained: None