HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 - CC-6 - Annual Review of Current Housing Element - 9/5/2017CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 ITEM NUMBER: CC -6
SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE CURRENT HOUSING ELEMENT AND FINAL REVIEW OF
THE PREVIOUS GENERAL PLAN PURSUANT TO STATE LAW
DATE: AUGUST 21, 2017
FROM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT / PLANNING DIVISION
PRESENTATION BY: BARRY CURTIS, ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JUSTIN ARIOS, ASSISTANT PLANNER
(714) 754-5667, justin.arios@costamesaca.gov
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve 2016 Annual Report of the 2015-2035 adopted Costa Mesa General Plan.
ANAI YSIS-
State Government Code Section 65400 requires that an annual report be made to the
legislative body on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation,
including activity towards its share of regional housing needs.
Pursuant to State law, the 2016 Annual Review of the Costa Mesa General Plan evaluates
and reports to the City Council and Planning Commission the progress in implementing
the previous General Plan. This will be the final review of the previous General Plan. The
Planning Commission received and recommended approval of the report at a regularly
scheduled meeting on July 10, 2017.
BARRY CURTIS, AICP
Economic and Development Services
Director
Attachment 1 - 2016 Annual Reaort
MINOO ASHABI, AIA
Principal Planner
PM
Im
ATTACHMENT 1
An Annual Report of the Costa Mesa 2015-2035 General Plan
City of Costa Mesa
Development Services Department
Costa Mesa 11Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92628
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (111 Edition) Page 3
Table of Contents
Background........................................................................ Page 4
Analysis............................................................................. Page 4
Conclusion......................................................................... Page 6
Table 1 — Annual Review ...................................................... Page 7
Tables A1, and A2 — Annual Building Activity Report .................. Page 63
Table B — Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress ............ Page 64
Table C — Housing Program Status ........................................ Page 66
Table D — Approved & Completed Residential Units ................... Page 71
Appendix A — General Plan Goals, Objectives, Policies ............... Page 74
Appendix B — Housing Successor Annual Report ..................... Page 75
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (111 Edition) Page 4
BACKGROUND
On June 29, 1953, the City of Costa Mesa was incorporated as a general law city led by a City Council -
Manager form of government. The City of Costa Mesa originally consisted of an area of 3.5 square
miles and general population of 16,840. The City's current estimated population is 110,524 persons,
and it consists of an overall land area of 16.8 square miles.
The City adopted its first General Plan in 1957 and its second General Plan in 1970. The General Plan
was comprehensively amended in 1981 and again in 1992. On January 22, 2002, the City Council
adopted the Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan. The 2000 General Plan recognized the community's
diverse evolution of residential neighborhoods, its regional commercial influence, and its recreational
amenities.
The City has completed a comprehensive General Plan update (2015-2035 General Plan) that was
approved on June 21, 2016. Many of the policies were carried over from the 2000 General Plan and new
policies were added in compliance with the latest State mandates and in accordance with the economic
growth of the City. This is an annual report to Planning Commission and City Council as required by
state law on the updates of programs and policies of the General Plan. The purpose of this review is to
provide the status of the previous and newly adopted policies during 2016. Table 1 provides a summary
of the current status of various elements including the latest adopted Housing Element in 2013 of the
General Plan. A number of new policies have been incorporated in the 2015-2035 General Plan.
However, since the 2015-2035 General Plan was approved in mid -2016, several new policies have not
received City action for the 2016 General Plan Annual Review.
ANALYSIS
Government Code Section 65400
State Government Code Section 65400 requires that an annual report be made to the legislative body
on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation, including activity towards its
share of regional housing needs. This is the 13th annual review of the 2000 General Plan.
State Law requires the following:
• Provide by April of each year an annual report to the City Council, the Office of Planning and
Research, and the Department of Housing and Community Development that includes all of the
following:
(A) The status of the plan and progress in its implementation.
(B) The progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs determined pursuant to
Section 65.584 and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance,
improvement, and development of housing. The housing element portion of the annual
report shall include a section that describes the actions taken by the City of Costa Mesa
towards completion of the programs and status of the local government's compliance
with the deadlines in its housing element.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (V Edition) Page 5
Annual Review and Housing Program Summary Report
Pursuant to State law, the 2016 Annual Review of the Costa Mesa General Plan reports to the City
Council the progress in implementing the General Plan. The 2016 Annual Review includes the
following elements:
1. Table 1 (Annual Review Summary) describes the status of the 2015-2035 General Plan goals,
objectives, and policies and progress towards implementing the City's blueprint for land use
development in 2016.
2. Tables A, B, and C (Housing Program Status Report) summarizes the City's progress in meeting
its share of regional housing needs, pursuant to State Government Code Section 65584 and local
efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development
of housing.
3. The conclusion describes the effectiveness of the 2015-2035 General Plan.
2015-2035 General Plan — Goals, Objectives, and Policies
The 2015-2035 General Plan goals, objectives, and policies are described in a comprehensive
document (attached as Appendix A).
• A goal is defined as a broad vision of what the community wants to achieve or provide to
residents, landowners, business owners and tourists. It is a statement of a desired condition
based on community values. Goals are general in nature and usually timeless.
• A policy is a specific statement that guides decision-making. It indicates a commitment of the
City to a particular course of action. A policy is based on and helps implement a goal.
General Plan Update
The State Office of Planning and Research recommends that Cities update their General Plan every 10
years. City Council approved the City's 2015-2035 General Plan on June 21, 2016. The General Plan
update is an extensive process that involves various public meetings with City commissions and Council
and extensive community outreach.
As part of this update, the City is also complying with the requirements of Assembly Bill 1358
(enacted in 2008), The California Complete Streets Act that requires integrating multimodal
transportation network policies into the circulation elements of the general plans. In addition, the
Housing Element was updated in January 2014 and compliance was received from the State
Department of Housing and Community Development for an eight-year Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (RHNA) cycle that ends in 2021.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (111 Edition) Page 6
CONCLUSION
The Costa Mesa 2015-2035 General Plan serves as an effective guide for orderly growth and
development, preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources, and efficient
expenditure of public funds.
As illustrated in Tables 1, A, B, and C, completed projects are in conformance with the General Plan's
goals, objectives, and policies for each respective element. Furthermore, significant progress on various
public works projects or private developments are also in accordance with the 2015-2035 General Plan.
The City's legislative bodies have used the 2015-2035 General Plan as the primary source of long-range
planning and policy direction. All future development and activities will be consistent with these goals
and policies that will continue to guide growth and preserve the quality of life within the community.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Costa M Table 1 — Annual Review
Page 7
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal LU -1: A Balanced Community with a Mix of Land Uses to Meet Resident and Business Needs
Objective LURA: Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level
no greater than can be supported by the infrastructure.
LU -1.1 Provide for the development of a mix and balance of housing
Updated zoning ordinance to be consistent with the General Plan allowing
opportunities, commercial goods and services, and employment
additional housing and mixed use opportunities. The Land Use
opportunities in consideration of the needs of the business and residential
Designations and correlated Zoning Map ensure a variety of commercial,
segments of the community.
residential, and industrial uses throughout the City.
All commercial development within the City which occurs near residential
LU -1.2 Balance economic gains from new development while preserving
development requires additional scrutiny and in many cases requires a
the character and densities of residential neighborhoods.
higher level of discretionary approval to ensure that the use does not
ne ativel impact the residential neighborhood.
LU -1.3 Strongly encourage the development of residential uses and
Homeownership is encouraged with development of all residential
owner -occupied housing (single-family detached residences,
projects, especially Small Lot Subdivisions and in particular in the West
condominiums, townhouses) where feasible to improve the balance
Side overlay districts.
between rental and ownership housing opportunities.
LU -1.4 Promote housing and employment opportunities within planned
The Urban Plan Overlays and the Planned Development Commercial
development areas to the extent feasible.
zonin allow mixed use development.
LU -1.5 Maintain a land use structure that strives to balance jobs and
Ongoing.
housing with available infrastructure and public and human services.
Goal LU -2: Preserve and Protect Residential Neighborhoods
Objective LU -2A: Promote land use patterns and development that contribute
to community and neighborhood identity.
LU -2.1 In the event of damage or destruction, allow any legal conforming
use in existence at the time of adoption of the General Plan that is located
in a nonconforming development to be rebuilt to its original building
Ongoing. Chapter X of the Zoning Code establishes requirements for
intensity, as long as any such rebuilding would not increase the
nonconforming uses, developments and lots.
development's nonconformity, and the damage or destruction was in no
way brought about by intentional acts of any owner of such use or
property.
LU -2.2 Pursue maximum use of utility company funds and resources in
undergrounding existing overhead lines, and encourage undergrounding
Ongoing.
of utilities in the public right-of-way for residential development consisting
of five units or more, to the extent feasible and practical.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13"' Edition)
Page 8
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
LU -2.3 Develop standards, policies, and other methods to encourage the
Ongoing, the City adopted the Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance in 2014 to
grouping of individual parcels to eliminate obsolete subdivision patterns
allow subdivisions of detached residential structures within the density
and to provide improved living environments while being consistent with
and zoning requirements of multi -family residential districts.
the neighborhood character of the surrounding community.
LU -2.4 Do not allow "rounding up" when calculating the number of
permitted residential units, except for lots existing as of March 16, 1992,
Consistently applied in review of development proposals. Densities in
zoned R2 -MD that have less than 7,260 square feet in area, and no less
excess of General Plan are subject to approval of a General Plan
than 6,000 square feet, where density calculation fractions of 1.65 or
Amendment.
greater may be rounded up to two units.
LU -2.5 Allow creation of parcels without street frontage if sufficient
easements are provided for planned developments or common -interest
All common roadway and access in common interest developments are
developments consistent with the neighborhood character. This policy
subject to recordation of an easement.
does not apply to small lot subdivisions.
Ongoing. The City Council adopted Small Lot Ordinance in March 2014 to
LU -2.6 Encourage increased private market investment in declining or
encourage fee simple lot subdivisions and reinvestment in older multiple
deteriorating neighborhoods.
family zoned properties. Several projects approved on Westside has
replaced marginal industrial and commercial properties with new housing
and live/work developments.
LU -2.7 Permit the construction of buildings over two stories or 30 feet
Commercial buildings over 30 feet are subject to Planning Commission
only when it can be shown that the construction of such structures will not
approval of a variance and considered on a case-by-case basis. There
adversely impact surrounding developments and deprive existing land
has been no variance and General Plan Amendment approval to increase
uses of adequate light, air, privacy, and solar access.
the height. Structures in urban overlay plans are typically over 30 feet and
are evaluated with respect to privacy and shade and shadow impacts.
LU -2.8 Limit building height to four stories above grade south of the 1-405
Freeway, except for special purpose housing such as elderly, affordable,
There has been no variance or General Plan Amendment approval in
or student housing, unless otherwise approved by a General Plan
2016 to increase the maximum height of buildings over the allowable
amendment. (A four-story/five-level parking structure with roof deck
heights established by the General Plan south of the 1-405 Freeway.
parking on the fifth level is considered a four-story structure.
LU -2.9 Require appropriate building setbacks, structure orientation, and
Ongoing and applicable to all second floor additions and remodels and
placement windows to consider the privacy of adjacent residential
new three-story developments.
structures within the same project and on adjacent properties.
LU -2.10 Promote lot consolidation of residential properties to the extent
feasible and practical, including the creation of larger single-family
Ongoing. Most projects in Urban Plan areas are proposed with lot
residential lots that exceed the minimum 6,000 -square -foot requirement in
consolidation. Lot consolidation is challenging for developers, but
neighborhoods where the prevailing residential subdivision pattern
encouraged for all new developments.
features larger -sized residential lots.
LU -2.11 Ensure adequate noise attenuation in urban design, such as
Ongoing. Any new development is subject to compliance with the noise
walls for sound attenuation, development of landscaped greenbelts,
standards and installation of sound walls to protect residential
provision of landscape berms, etc.
neighborhoods.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13' Edition) Page 9
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Goal LU -3: Development that Maintains Neighborhood Integrity and Character
Objective LU -3A: Establish policies, standards, and procedures to minimize blighting influences, and maintain the integrity of stable neighborhoods.
There have been no other development affecting stabilized residential
LU -3.1 Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including
neighborhoods or mobile home parks. The City has taken additional
mobile home parks (and manufactured housing parks), from the
action to protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including
encroachment of incompatible or potentially disruptive land uses and/or
the adoption of the Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance on January 8, 2016
activities.
amend Title 13, Chapter I and Chapter 5, and adding Article 20 to Chapter
IX ado ting new regulations related to prohibiting marijuana cultivation.
LU -3.2 Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or
Ongoing through the implementation and enforcement of Title 20 —
abandoned vehicles, outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal buildings,
Property Maintenance, of the Municipal Code. Title 20 establishes
and establish regulations to abate weed -filled yards when any of the
standards to ensure proper maintenance, removal of hazardous and
above are deemed to constitute a health, safety, or fire hazard.
improper storage, and removal of weeds and other public nuisances.
LU -3.3 Continue code enforcement as a high priority with regard to the
Ongoing.
regulation of property maintenance standards citywide.
LU -3.4 Ensure that residential densities can be supported by the
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects. All new development is subject to
infrastructure and are compatible with existing residential neighborhoods
submittal of a will serve letter from the utility companies.
in the surrounding area.
LU -3.5 Provide opportunities for the development of well-planned and
designed projects which, through vertical or horizontal integration, provide
Ongoing. Development of mixed use projects are encouraged by planned
for the development of compatible residential, commercial, industrial,
development commercial and overlay zones.
institutional, or public uses within a single project or neighborhood.
Staff works with property owners, brokers, and agents to help find the
LU -3.6 Facilitate revitalization of aging commercial centers by working
right type of uses to be catalyst for revitalization. This includes conducting
with property owners, developers, local businesses, and other community
interviews with existing businesses, organizing meetings to facilitate an
organizations to coordinate efforts.
exchange of information and guidance, and taking potential sites to a
retail conference to assist in sites being redeveloped or tenant vacancies
filled.
LU -3.7 Promote development/design flexibility that encourages older or
Ongoing.
poorly maintained high-density residential uses to be rehabilitated.
LU -3.8 Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards,
qualities, and features that are in context with nearby development and
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects.
surrounding residential neighborhoods.
LU -3.9 Locate high-intensity developments or high -traffic -generating uses
Traffic impacts are evaluated with each development project with
away from low-density residential in order to buffer the more sensitive land
consideration to the City's circulation and any potential impacts to
uses from the potentially adverse impacts of the more intense
residential neighborhoods.
development or uses.
LU -3.10 Minimize effects of new development on the privacy and
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects.
character of surrounding neighborhoods.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 10
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
LU -3.11 Promote small -lot residential development on long, narrow,
Ongoing. Most projects in Urban Plan areas are proposed with lot
single parcels or combined residential lots.
consolidation. Lot consolidation is challenging for developers, but
encoura ed for all new developments.
LU -3.12 Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards,
Ongoing and reviewed for all residential projects. All residential
qualities, and features that are in context with nearby development.
development is required to meet the intent of the Residential Design
Guidelines.
LU -3.13 Prohibit construction of buildings which would present a hazard
FAA is notified and reviews all mid -rise and high-rise development. The
to air navigation, as determined by the Federal Aviation Administration
now adopted General Plan was found to be consistent with the John
(FAA).
Wayne Airport Environmental Land Use Plan at the Airport Land Use
Commission ALUC meeting on May 19th, 2016.
LU -3.14 Certain development proposals which may include the
construction or alteration of structures more than 200 feet above ground
level may require filing with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and
Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) pursuant to federal and State law. If
a filing requirement is determined to be necessary in accordance with the
Filing with FAA and ALUC approval is required for all projects exceeding
procedures provided by State/federal agencies, the filing of a Notice of
the established FAA thresholds.
Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form 7460-1) shall be required
prior to review and consideration of the proposed development." Land Use
Element (page LU -18) refers to the threshold stated above. It shall be
amended to refer to Filing FAA Form 7460-1 Notice of Construction and
Alteration, and not to Form 7480-1.
LU -3.15 The City will ensure that development proposals, including the
construction or operation of a heliport or helistop comply fully with permit
procedures under State law, including referral of the project to the ALUC
by the applicant, and with all conditions of approval imposed or
Ongoing for all related development projects.
recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration, ALUC, and
Caltrans, including the filing of Form 7480-1 (Notice of Landing Area
Proposed) with the FAA. This requirement shall be in addition to all other
City development requirements.
LU -3.16 The City shall refer certain projects to the Airport Land Use
Commission for Orange County, as required by Section 21676 of the
Ongoing for applicable projects.
California Public Utilities Code to determine consistency of the project(s)
with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport.
LU 3.17 New residential developments within the 60 dB CNEL noise
contour of the airport shall provide designated outdoor signage informing
Reviewed for residential projects within proximity to the airport.
the public of the presence of operating aircraft.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 11
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Goal LU -4: New Development that Is Sensitive to Costa Mesa's Environmental Resources
Objective LU -4A: Encourage new development and redevelopment that protects and improves the quality of Costa Mesa's natural environment and
resources.
LU -4.1 Ensure that appropriate watershed protection activities are applied
Ongoing. All development plans are required to submit the appropriate
to all new development and significant redevelopment projects that are
state required permits and water quality management plans per local
subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater
ordinance.
Permit during the planning,project review, and permitting processes.
LU -4.2 Avoid conversion of areas particularly susceptible to erosion and
sediment loss (e.g., steep slopes) and/or establish development guidelines
Ongoing. Erosion control plans are consistently required and reviewed
that identifies these areas and protects them from erosion and sediment
prior to grading permits.
loss.
LU -4.3 Preserve or restore areas that provide water quality benefits
Ongoing.
and/or are necessary to maintain riparian and aquatic biota.
LU -4.4 Promote site development that limits impact on and protects the
natural integrity of topography, drainage systems, and water bodies, and
Ongoing.
protect the integrity of the bluff crest.
LU -4.5 Promote integration of stormwater quality protection into
construction and post -construction activities, as required by the NPDES
Ongoing.
Stormwater Permit and the City's Local Implementation Plan.
LU -4.6 Incorporate the principles of sustainability into land use planning,
infrastructure, and development processes to reduce greenhouse gas
Ongoing.
emissions consistent with State goals.
Goal LU -5: Adequate Community Services, Transportation System, and Infrastructure to Meet Growth
Objective LU -5A: Ensure availability of adequate community facilities and provision of the highest level of public services possible, taking into
consideration budgetary constraints and effects on the surrounding area.
On December 15, 2014, a County island was officially annexed into the
LU -5.1 Pursue annexation of certain areas within the City's Sphere of
City's jurisdiction. The annexation area contains 54 residential parcels on
Influence to provide land use regulation and city services within its
Colleen Place, Vista Baya, Santa Ana Avenue and 22nd Street in Eastside
jurisdiction.
Costa Mesa. Development was approved by Planning Commission on
May 23, 2016.
LU -5.2 Strongly encourage protection and preservation of existing but
underutilized school sites for future recreational, social, or educational
Ongoing.
uses.
LU -5.3 As appropriate and timely, consider the establishment of
development impact fee program(s) to fund additional fire and police
Fee study pending for late 2017.
personnel, library facilities, and related equipment to meet the demands of
additional growth in the City.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (131h Edition) Page 12
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
LU -5.4 Require appropriate site and environmental analysis for future fire
Currently there are six fire stations operating in the City. The City
and police station site locations or for the relocation or closure of existing
continues to monitor fire service needs as the population grows with new
fire and police facilities.
residential development projects.
LU.5.5 Ensure that new development pays its fair share of impact fees
such as park fees and traffic impact fees. This can also include impact
fees related to community services (police protection services and fire
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects.
emergency response services) or library facilities, once adopted and
applicable.
LU -5.6 Promote development of revenue -generating land uses to help
Ongoing.
defray the costs of high quality public services.
LU -5.7 Encourage new development that is organized around compact,
walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods and districts to conserve open space
Ongoing.
resources, minimize infrastructure costs, and reduce reliance on the
automobile.
LU -5.8 Include an evaluation of impacts on utility systems and
Will serve letters from utility companies are required for all projects that
infrastructure in EIRs for all major general plan amendment, rezone, and
could potentially impact the service.
development alications.
LU -5.9 Phase or restrict future development in the City to that which can
Will serve letters from utility companies are required for all projects that
be accommodated by infrastructure at the time of completion of each
could potentially impact the service.
phase of a multi -phased project.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 13
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
LU -5.10 Building densities/intensities for proposed new development
projects shall not exceed the trip budget for applicable land use
classifications, as identified in the Land Use Element. Building intensities
for proposed new development projects shall not exceed the applicable
floor area standards, except for the following conditions:
(a) Limited deviations from the graduated floor -area ratio standards for
the commercial and industrial land use designations may be approved
through a discretionary review process. No deviation shall exceed a
0.05 increase in the FAR in the moderate traffic category, and no
deviation shall be allowed in the very low, low, and high traffic
categories. Deviations from the FAR standards shall not cause the
a) No project specific General Plan Amendment exceeding the allowable
daily trip generation for the property to be exceeded when compared
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) was approved in 2016.
to the existing daily trip generation for the site without the proposed
project or maximum allowable traffic generation for the Moderate
b) Any intensification of use or additions of floor area for non -conforming
Traffic FAR category, whichever is greater.
structures is subject to the zoning development standards and traffic
(b) Additions to existing nonconforming nonresidential developments may
generation rates.
be allowed if the additions do not affect the overall traffic generation
characteristics of the development and if the additions do not
c) There has been no change to the policy.
substantially affect the existing height and bulk of the development.
Additions to nonresidential developments shall be limited to those land
d) There has been no change to the policy.
uses with traffic generation rates based on variables other than
building area square footage. Examples of such additions include, but
are not limited to: 1) Hotels/motels: Increases in the size of hotel
rooms or lobbies where no increase in the total number of rooms is
proposed, and 2) theaters: Increases to "back -stage" support areas or
lobbies where no increase in the total number of seats is proposed.
(c) In the above conditions, the new development shall be compatible
with surrounding land uses.
(d) Additional criteria for approving deviations from the FAR standards
may be established by policyof the City Council.
LU -5.11 Development plans shall be required for all phased development
and approvals and shall be approved by the Planning and Transportation
Ongoing.
Services Divisions prior to the issuance of building permits.
LU -5.12 Development plans shall include an overall buildout plan, which
Each project application is reviewed for any potential impacts on the
can demonstrate the ability of the circulation system to support the
circulation system. Projects with impacts are subject to either traffic
proposed level of development.
improvement requirements and or traffic mitigation fees.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1311 Edition) Page 14
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
LU -5.13 The City shall continue its annual preparation of the
Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program. The annual
The Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program
review will specifically address major intersection operations in any mixed-
(DPPMP) Report will be prepared every two years.
use overlay area.
Goal LU -6: Economically Viable and Productive Land Uses that Increase the City's Tax Base
Objective LU -6A: Ensure the long-term productivity and viability of the community's economic base.
LU -6.1 Encourage a mixed of land uses that maintain and improve the
Ongoing.
City's long-term fiscal health.
LU -6.2 Continue to promote and support the vitality of commercial uses to
meet the needs of local residents and that support regional -serving
Ongoing.
commercial centers.
LU -6.3 Continue to prioritize commercial and industrial park use of
Continue to facilitate resident supported Measure X which will provide
properties north of 1-405 and within the Airport Industrial District.
strong economic incentive to maintain industrial uses within the Harbor
Gateway.
LU -6.4 Support the continued presence of incubator businesses in the
Ongoing.
actionsports industry and jobs -producing businesses in the Westside.
LU -6.5 Encourage revitalization of existing, older commercial and
Over 600 live/work, mixed use and residential units have been approved
industrial areas in the Westside with new mixed-use development
in Westside Costa Mesa where older commercial and industrial uses
consisting of ownership housing stock and live/work units.
located
LU -6.6 Continue to encourage and retain land uses that generate
sustainable sales and property tax revenues, including regional
Ongoing.
commercial destinations and automobile dealerships.
LU -6.7 Encourage new and retain existing businesses that provide local
Ongoing.
shopping and services.
LU -6.8 Provide efficient and timely review of development proposals while
All development proposals are assigned to a planner who works as a
maintaining quality customer service standards for the business,
liaison for that project from application submittal until final inspection of
development, and residential community.
the development.
LU -6.9 Support the retention and growth of Class A office tenants,
City welcome and supported the move of Vans headquarters to 1835
including corporate headquarters for the action sports industry, biotech,
South Coast Drive through expedited review and interdepartmental
and high technology companies within the City.
collaboration.
Objective LU -6113: Encourage and facilitate activities that expand the City's revenue base.
LU -6.10 Encourage a broad range of business uses that provide
employment at all income levels and that make a positive contribution to
Ongoing.
the City's tax base.
LU -6.11 Provide opportunities for mixed-use, office, manufacturing, and
retail development that respond to market and community needs in terms
Ongoing.
of size, location, and cost.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (131' Edition)
Page 15
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
LU -6.12 Track retail trends and tailor regulations to respond to market
Staff has been attending quarterly meetings which provide trends and
changes, maximize revenue, and maintain the appropriate the business
forecasts for the industrial, retail, and office markets. This information is
used to provide insight as staff continues to evaluate new business or
mix.
otential redevelo ment projects within the City.
LU -6.13 Encourage new development along major corridors that are
pedestrian oriented and includes a mixture of retail/service, residential,
Ongoing.
and office uses.
LU -6.14 Improve ease and accessibility to information to capture
Updated City's Economic Development website to improve the ease and
opportunities for businesses to establish in Costa Mesa and bring high-
jobs
accessibility to information for businesses and potential developers.
skill and professional and new revenue sources into the community.
LU -6.15 Promote unique and specialized commercial and industrial
districts within the City which allow for incubation of new or growing
Ongoing.
businesses and industries.
LU -6.16 Examine options for the development of new infrastructure for
Ongoing.
new technologies and businesses that use those technologies.
Objective LU -6C: Retain and expand the City's diverse employment base, including office, retail/service, restaurants, high-tech, action sports,
boutique and prototype manufacturing, and industrial businesses.
LU -6.17 Engage in activities that promote Costa Mesa as a great place to
Ongoing.
live, work, and develop a business.
LU -6.18 Continue to work with surrounding cities to strengthen regional
Attended local and regional economic development summits, workshops,
economic development
and meetings.
LU -6.19 Provide flexibility and support for development of residential,
office, small retail centers, and similar uses that would serve local
Ongoing.
residents and would also benefit from the high visibility along major
corridors outside of significant commercial or industrial nodes.
Goal LU -7: A Sound Local Sustainable Economy that Attracts Investment, Creates Educational Opportunities, and Generates Employment
Opportunities
LU -7.1 Endeavor to create mixture of employment opportunities for all
Ongoing.
economic levels of residents and businesses.
LU -7.2 Support linkages between local educational institutions and local
industries and businesses. Foster training, collaboration with employers,
Ongoing.
and new innovative programs that increase job opportunities for residents
and students attending school locally.
LU -7.3 Foster and provide useful and efficient partnerships to implement
Continue to collaborate in regular meetings with private, non-profit, and
economic opportunities with private, non-profit, or other public agencies.
other public agencies.
LU -7.4 Cultivate an entrepreneurial and academic environment that
Over 600 live/work and non-traditional housing units have been approved
fosters innovation through non-traditional housing developments, flexible
and being constructed in the Westside as a result of the Urban plans. This
office spaces, experiential development, and ensuring the diversity of
area houses a great many incubator business as well as industries that
retail/service throughout the urban districts.
thrive off of smaller secondary and tertiary businesses.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 16
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
LU -7.5 Support and provide flexibility for development projects and
businesses which produce, care, and maintain material goods or fixed
Ongoing.
assets meant to support the production of market goods, especially for
niche industries within the City of Costa Mesa.
LU -7.6 Seek out opportunities to attract primary businesses within stable
Collaborating with multiple property owners and businesses to attract new
industries and support industries that already exist within the City.
hotels to the City. Update yearly all our Advantage Brochure and
Community Economic Profile handout.
LU -7.7 Explore economic and employment opportunities to retain and
Conducted interviews with major industries within these areas and is
strengthen the unique industry niches along Bristol and Paularino, in the
conducting ongoing dialogues to support our existing businesses.
Westside, on East 17th Street, and throughout North Costa Mesa.
The George and Julianne Argyros Plaza was reviewed and approved.
LU -7.8 Support the development of pedestrian plazas and gathering
This is a substantial investment in the arts plaza that lies in between the
places, and institutional spaces, as well as the more efficient use of
Segerstrom Hall and Henry and Renee Segerstrom Concert Hall. The
existing spaces, to support economic growth and branding of existing
redevelopment will generate an outdoor performing space, increase
industries within the City.
pedestrian linkages in the Theater Arts District, and create a beautiful
s ace for residents and guest to enjoy.
Goal LU -8: Promote a range of multiple uses at the Fairview Developmental
Center site
LU -8.1 In anticipation of the potential closure or repurposing of the
Fairview Development Center site, the City will work with appropriate State
Continue to work with the State on all actions and legislation in relation to
agencies or private entity (if the property is sold) to plan for a
the redevelopment or reuse of this site. The Fairview Developmental
complementary mix of low -scale residential, institutional, public facilities,
Center is expected to close around 2021.
open saces, and recreational uses within a campus setting.
Goal LU -9: Ensure that Fairgrounds uses are consistent with the General Plan
designation
LU -9.1 Discourage changes in the allowable uses specified in the
Fairgrounds General Plan land use designation for the Orange County
Ongoing.
Fair & Event Center property. Ensure that amendments to this General
Plan designation are approved by the electorate.
Goal LU -10: Promote the growth of tourism
Objective LU -10A: Promote structural improvements of visitor -oriented land uses.
LU -10.1 Engage with property owners, developers, and business owners
Ongoing meetings and collaboration with property owners and developers
to encourage the revitalization of the hotel/motels.
to encourage the revitalization of motels and inns within the City.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1311 Edition)
Page 17
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
LU -10.2 Provide incentives to motel development projects seeking to
improve existing motel facilities by increasing the hotel rating. These
projects may include:
• Updating building mechanical, electrical, or plumbing to comply with
current building standards
Ongoing.
• Updating physical improvements to the site
• Adding hotel amenities to the site
• Updating or improving the landscaping on the site
• Updating or improving the facade of the building(s)
Objective LU -1013: Promote growth of visitor -oriented land uses.
LU -10.3 Motel and hotel land uses should be encouraged to be located
near major transportation corridors and close to key tourist/visitor draws,
Ongoing.
other recreation venues, the airport, regional, and general local shopping
centers.
LU -10.4 Consider the interest of quality of stay for visitors when
evaluating projects near visitor -oriented land uses by requiring on-site
Ongoing.
amenities and upscale guest services.
Objective LU -10C: Promote uses and events that make visitor -oriented business more economically viable.
Ongoing - The George and Julianne Argyros Plaza was reviewed and
LU -10.5 Celebrate and promote the arts, culture, and industries of Costa
approved. This is a substantial investment in the arts plaza that lies in
Mesa through special events, civic gatherings, and City marketing and
between the Segerstrom Hall and Henry and Renee Segerstrom Concert
tourism promotion efforts.
Hall. The redevelopment will generate an outdoor performing space,
increase pedestrian linkages in the Theater Arts District, and create a
beautiful space for residents and guest to enjoy.
LU -10.6 Promote the development of small-scale manufacturing uses or
other uses that generate multiple secondary and tertiary markets that
Ongoing.
support business travel tourism -related uses.
LU -10.7 Maintain and enhance the City's status and image as a centrally
Ongoing.
located destination and cultural center in Orange County.
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Goal C-1: Implement "Complete Streets" Policies on Roadways in Costa Mesa
Objective CAA: Create a transportation network that meets the mobilityneeds of all Costa Mesa residents, businesses, and visitors.
C-1.1: Update the City's engineering standards for public and private
streets to provide for safe, comfortable, and attractive access and travel
Ongoing.
for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit users of all ages, abilities,
and modes of travel.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 18
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
C-1.2: Allow for flexible use of public rights-of-way to accommodate all
Ongoing.
users of the streets stem while maintaining safety standards.
C-1.3: Complete and annually maintain a needs assessment for traffic
service levels and traffic safety. Develop and annually update a priority list
of improvement projects, with priorities based on: 1) correcting identified
A review of traffic levels of service at key intersections will be conducted
hazards; 2) accommodating multimodal trips; 3) improving and/or
later in the year.
maintaining peak -hour traffic volumes at critical intersections; 4) improving
efficiency of existing infrastructure utilization; and 5) intergovernmental
coordination.
C-1.4: Pursue downgrade of arterials that no longer have the demand
Ongoing.
requiring their buildout to planned capacity.
C-1.5: Implement road diets on street segments with excess capacity to
Merrimac Way is being considered for a road diet project.
enhance bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
C-1.6: Encourage the conversion of excess on -street parking spaces for
Ongoing.
expanded sidewalk gathering places or landscaping.
C-1.7: Encourage community participation in City processes and
Community meetings were held on several projects including several
programs focused on improving mobility and transportation facilities.
median design projects.
C-1.8: Pursue downgrade of 17th Street from 6 -lane Major Arterial to 4 -
lane Primary Arterial between Orange Ave and Tustin Avenue, through
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) Amendment process with the
annual review.
Orange County Transportation Authority.
Objective C-1 B: Preserve the character of our residential neighborhoods
C-1.9: Implement traffic calming measures that discourage speeding and
Ongoing. Currently, a project is underway to install neighborhood traffic
cut -through traffic on residential streets.
control measures on East 19th Street.
C-1.10: Encourage non -motorized transportation in residential areas by
providing sidewalks and implementing bicycle friendly design of local
Ongoing.
streets.
C-1.11: Reduce or eliminate intrusion of traffic related to non-residential
Traffic calming measures and warning signs are installed as necessary on
development on local streets in residential neighborhoods
local streets to reduce cut through traffic.
C-1.12: Prioritize intersection improvements which improve through traffic
flow on Major, Primary, and Secondary Arterials, and reduce impacts on
Ongoing.
local neighborhood streets with emphasis on pedestrian safety.
C-1.13: Promote engineering improvements such as physical measures
Median projects are being implemented on several arterials to address
constructed to lower speeds, improve safety, and otherwise reduce the
speeding and reduce severe accidents.
impacts of motor vehicles.
C-1.14: Design and Implement transportation projects to meet local and
regional system capacity needs in accordance with the Master Plan of
Ongoing.
Streets and Highways.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 19
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
C-1.15: Implement neighborhood approved traffic -calming measures in
residential neighborhoods and appropriate commercial areas, such as
East 19th Street project implements several of these measures. Similar
street narrowing, curb extensions, roundabouts, landscaped medians, and
projects will be considered on other streets.
radarspeed feedback signs.
C-1.16: Establish priority -ranking system to evaluate traffic -calming
Ongoing.
requests for implementation throughout the City.
C-1.17: Pursue programs that reduce vehicle speeds and cut -through
Ongoing.
traffic on local streets.
Goal C-2: Effectively Manage and Improve the Roadway System
Objective C -2A: Implement policies that encourage and accommodate all
users while maintaining the efficiency of the circulations stem.
C-2.1: Establish a citywide crosswalk policy to address installation,
maintenance, removal, and enhancements of crosswalks at intersections
and mid -block locations. Crosswalk locations and treatment will be based
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
on criteria including, but not limited to safety, traffic volume, and
annual review.
concentration of pedestrian activity. Potential enhancements may include
leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections, bulb -outs, and
median refuges to reduce crossing distances.
C-2.2: Avoid creation of frequent driveways for new development access
in active pedestrian areas that create conflict points between pedestrians
Ongoing.
and vehicles.
C-2.3: Encourage commercial property owners to use shared driveway
access and interconnected roads within blocks, where feasible. Require
Ongoing.
driveway access closures or consolidations, or both when a site is
remodeled or redeveloped.
C-2.4: Collaborate with law enforcement and public safety organizations
to coordinate policies and programs that would reduce injuries and deaths
Ongoing.
on the roadways.
C-2.5: Designate routes for truck traffic to minimize potential conflicts
between trucks and cars, pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and vehicle access
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
and circulation. Establish by ordinance a truck map that depicts allowable
annual review.
truck routes within the City.
C-2.6: Periodically review and update traffic signal timing at all signalized
intersections to maintain traffic signal coordination and to accommodate
Ongoing.
bicycle and pedestrian needs.
C-2.7: Develop new traffic level of services criteria in accordance with SB
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
743 to meet the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA .
annual review.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 20
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
C-2.8: Continue the use of the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU)
methodology to address local traffic level of service and impacts, with
Ongoing.
Level of Service "D" as the threshold for meeting the City's significance
criteria.
Objective C -21B: Construct street improvements and apply congestion management tools to obtain efficient performance of the transportation
system.
C-2.9: Incorporate the street system improvements identified in the
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) into the Capital
annual review.
Improvement Program.
C-2.10: Continue to deploy intelligent transportation systems (ITS)
strategies—such as adaptive signal controls, fiber optic communication
Ongoing. Traffic signal improvement projects are currently being
equipment, closed circuit television cameras, real-time transit information,
implemented along Harbor Boulevard, Sunflower Avenue, Newport
and real- time parking availability information—to reduce traffic delays,
Boulevard, Bristol Street and Fairview Road corridors.
lower greenhouse gas emissions, improve travel times, and enhance
safety for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists.
C-2.11: Investigate all operational measures, including the use of one-way
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
streets, to improve traffic circulation and to minimize congestion for all
annual review.
travel modes.
C-2.12: Investigate and utilize state-of-the-art transportation system
management technology and industry practices to address recurring and
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
non-recurring traffic events (i.e., special events, incident/emergency
annual review.
management).
C-2.13: Continue to evaluate and pursue design and operational
improvements (medians, driveway closures, signal synchronization or
Ongoing.
phasing, parking or turn restrictions, etc.) to improve the efficiency of
intersections.
Goal C-3: Enhance Regional Mobility and Coordination
Objective C -3A: Promote development of transportation projects along regional corridors.
C-3.1: Maintain compliance with Orange County Congestion
Management Plan (CMP) requirements, including consistency with CMP
level of service standards, adoption of a seven-year capital improvement
City conducts a review of CMP in coordination with OCTA every two
program, analysis of impacts of land use decisions on the CMP highway
years.
system, and adoption and implementation of deficiency plans when
intersections do not meet adopted performance standards.
C-3.2: Support the goals and objectives of the Orange County Long
Range Transportation Plan, including expansion of transportation system
Ongoing.
choices, improvement of transportation system performance, and
sustainability of transportation infrastructure.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 21
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
C-3.3: Support the goals and objectives of the SCAG Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS),
including expansion of transportation system choices, improvement of
Ongoing.
transportation system performance, and sustainability of transportation
infrastructure.
C-3.4: Coordinate signal timing on all major arterials with a local signal
Several traffic signal improvement projects are underway using this
synchronization program consistent with the Orange County Traffic Signal
program funding.
Synchronization Master Plan TSSMP .
C-3.5: Ensure Costa Mesa's input, participation, and discretionary review
of applicable region -wide transportation system policies, programs, and
Ongoing.
construction.
C-3.6: Develop short-term and long-term improvements to the SR -55
A design project will be underway in the next six months to review short -
corridor in coordination with Caltrans and OCTA to address regional
term improvement options for Newport Boulevard in the Downtown area.
mobility needs.
C-3.7: Promote the City's preferred alternative of undergrounding the
Ongoing.
SR -55 freeway south of 19th Street within the City limits.
Objective C-36: Coordinate and partner with local and regional agencies to promote projects and polices that improve regional mobility.
C-3.8: Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to maintain or improve
mobility within the City to achieve a standard Level of Service no worse
Ongoing coordination with Cities of Santa Ana, Newport Beach and
than "D" at all intersections under State or joint control. Intersection Level
Huntington Beach on traffic signal issues and development projects and
of Service analyses for General Plan conditions for locations under State
with Caltrans on their improvement projects.
or joint control will be updated periodically and presented to the City
Council.
C-3.9: Consult with Caltrans and OCTA regarding the 1-405 widening
project to minimize adverse impacts to Costa Mesa's neighborhoods,
Ongoing.
businesses, and streets.
C-3.10: Coordinate with OCTA and other jurisdictions to remove Gisler
The current designation is valid until 2020. Staff will initiate discussions in
Avenue Bridge over the Santa Ana River from the City's Master Plan of
2018 to resolve this.
Streets and Highways and County's Master Plan of Arterial Highways.
C-3.11: Collaborate with Caltrans and neighboring jurisdiction to improve
signal timing and coordination along major arterials across jurisdictional
Ongoing.
boundaries.
C-3.12: Work closely with the State of California and other government
agencies to control traffic—related impacts of uses on State- or other
Ongoing.
agency -owned land (i.e., Orange County Fairgrounds, Orange Coast
College, etc.).
C-3.13: Coordinate with other responsible agencies the planning, funding,
Secured grant from OCTA Project V to implement transit shuttle between
prioritization, and implementation of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit
South Coast Plaza area and LAB/Camp.
programs and supporting infrastructure.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13t1 Edition) Page 22
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Goal C-4: Promote Transportation Demand Management, Transit, and Efficiency
Objective C -4A: Encourage greater utilization of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to reduce dependence on
single -occupancy vehicles.
C-4.1: Support South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
trip reduction programs, including park and ride lots, transit subsidies,
Ongoing.
carpool and vanpool programs, flexible working hours, bicycle facilities,
and other traffic reduction strategies.
C-4.2: Support local and multi -jurisdictional car -sharing and bike -sharing
Ongoing.
programs.
C-4.3: Consider implementing park -once approaches for multiuse
Ongoing.
districts and regional destinations areas.
C-4.4: Embrace innovative parking solutions that reduce the required
This will be considered at project level review.
spaced needed for parking, such as automated parking lifts and elevators.
C-4.5: Encourage and provide incentives for commercial, office, and
Large projects are required to provide Transportation Demand
industrial development to provide preferred parking for carpools, vanpools,
Management (TDM) programs incorporating various trip reduction
electric vehicles, and flex cars.
strate ies.
C-4.6: Encourage and support programs that increase vehicle
occupancy, including the provision of traveler information, shuttles,
Ongoing. Secured grant from OCTA Project V to implement transit shuttle
preferential parking for carpool s/vanpools, transit pass subsidies, and
between South Coast Plaza area and LAB/Camp.
other methods.
C-4.7: Promote the combination of TDM measures as much more
Ongoing.
effective than any single measure.
C-4.8: Require discussion of transportation system management (TSM)
Ongoing.
and TDM measures in all EIRs prepared for major projects.
C-4.9: Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and housing
Ongoing.
into major development projects to reduce vehicle use.
C-4.10: Allow the application of transportation management rideshare
programs, integration of complementary land uses, and other methods to
Ongoing.
reduce project related average daily and peak hour vehicle trips to achieve
consistency with allocated trip budgets.
Objective C -41B: Promote regional and local transit services as an alternative to automobile travel.
C-4.11: Ensure that roadways designated as transit routes can
accommodate transit vehicle circulation and convenient pedestrian access
Ongoing.
to and from transit stops.
C-4.12: Review all capital improvement projects to ensure improvements
located on existing and planned transit routes include modification of
All improvement projects incorporate ADA facility improvements, bus stop
street, curb, and sidewalk configurations to allow for easier and more
improvements and sidewalk enhancements.
efficient transit operations and improved passenger access.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1311 Edition)
Page 23
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
C-4.13: Provide transit stop amenities that facilitate access to and from
transit stops and transfer locations. These may include pedestrian
pathways approaching stops, high-quality benches and shelters, traveler
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
information systems (real-time transit arrival information), and bike storage
annual review.
and bicycle connections. Bus stops should accommodate timed transfers
between buses and other transit services where necessary.
C-4.14: Encourage new development along major transit corridors to
Ongoing.
provide efficient and safe access to transit stops and public sidewalks.
C-4.15: Support and participate with OCTA ACCESS Service in providing
Ongoing.
transportation assistance to senior citizens and the disabled.
C-4.16: Consult with OCTA for transit services, such as changes to bus
routes, bus stops, and hours of operation. Additionally, coordinate with
Ongoing.
OCTA for changes to transit services provided for seniors, the disabled,
and transit dependent populations.
C-4.17: Consult with the Newport -Mesa Unified School District to maintain
Ongoing.
school bus services provided for local schoolchildren.
C-4.18: Coordinate with OCTA to improve transit services in the City,
including strategies such as bus rapid transit, express services,
Ongoing.
community circulators, and other strategies.
C-4.19: Encourage new local transit programs in coordination with OCTA,
Local transit shuttle initiated with OCTA Project V Funds.
consisting of shuttle services to local and regional destinations.
C-4.20: Coordinate with OCTA to construct bus turnouts at appropriate
Ongoing.
locations, with attractive shelters designed for safe and comfortable use.
C-4.21: Require discussion of transit service needs and site design
Ongoing.
amenities for transit ridership in EIR for major projects.
Goal C-5: Ensure Coordination between the Land Use and Circulation Systems
Objective C -5A: Coordinate land use policies and development activities that support a sustainable transportation system.
C-5.1: Ensure that new development projects are consistent with the
Ongoing.
vehicular trip budgets, where adopted.
C-5.2: Require that large developments and redevelopments provide
Ongoing. City requires detailed traffic analysis for all new developments
short-term and long-term vehicular traffic impact studies.
that generate 50 or more trips at any intersection during peak hours.
C-5.3: Encourage permitted General Plan land uses which generate high
traffic volumes to be located near major transit and transportation corridors
Ongoing.
to minimize vehicle use, congestion, and delay.
C-5.4: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by
phasing new developments to levels that can be accommodated by
Ongoing.
roadways existing or planned to exist at the time of completion of each
phase of the project.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13' Edition)
Page 24
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
C-5.5: Promote development of mixed-use projects to reduce number of
This is reviewed at project level.
vehicle trips.
C-5.6: Coordinate the design and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle
ways in major residential, shopping and employment centers, parks,
Ongoing.
schools, other public facilities, public transportation facilities, and bicycle
networks with adjacent cities.
C-5.7: Require dedication of right-of-way, in an equitable manner, for
City requires dedication of right-of-way as development occurs in
development that increases the intensity of land use.
accordance with Municipal Code requirements.
C-5.8: Minimize circulation improvements that will necessitate the taking
Ongoing.
of private property on existing developed properties.
C-5.9: Require that circulation necessary to provide or attain the
minimum traffic level of service standard at an intersection to which a
development project contributes measureable traffic be completed within
three years of issuance of the first building permit for such development
project, unless additional right-of-way or coordination with other
Ongoing.
government agencies is required to complete the improvement.
Improvements may be required sooner if, because of extraordinary traffic
generation characteristics of the project or extraordinary impacts to the
surrounding circulation system, such improvements are necessary to
prevent significant adverse impacts.
C-5.10: Allow for construction of circulation improvements for a phased
development project to be constructed commensurate with the project
Ongoing.
construction, based upon the findings of a traffic study approved by the
City of Costa Mesa.
C-5.11: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by
phasing new development to levels that can be accommodated by
Ongoing.
roadways existing or planned to exist at the time of completion of each
Kase of the project.
C-5.12: Support consistency with the Orange County Sustainable
Communities Strategy (OC SCS) and SCAG RTP/SCS by providing an
Ongoing.
integrated land use and transportation plan to meet mandated emissions
reduction targets consistent with SB 375.
Objective C-56: Establish strategies and processes that allow large developments to analyze and mitigate traffic impacts and infrastructure needs.
C-5.13: Require that new development projects improve access to and
Ongoing.
accommodations for multimodal transportation.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 25
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
C-5.14: Require developers of new building and redevelopment/reuse
projects as part of the project development review process that are located
along bus routes to pay a designated fair share of the cost of providing
Ongoing.
improved bus stop facilities and related street furniture or, where
appropriate, dedicate land for improved bus stop facilities.
C-5.15: Consider the needs of the transportation and infrastructure system
early for large developments and coordinate with developers to design
projects that minimize traffic impacts and infrastructure demands, and
Ongoing.
implement complete streets wherever feasible. Alternatively, address
transportation and infrastructure system impacts through the
implementation of development areements.
Goal C-6: Fund and Evaluate the City's Transportation Network
Objective C -6A: Pursue funding sources to maintain and enhance the trans ortation and infrastructures stem.
C-6.1: Evaluate traffic collision data regularly, and identify top collision
locations for automobiles, bicycles, pedestrians, transit in Costa Mesa.
Ongoing.
Develop appropriate countermeasures and pursue funding from all
available sources to implement them.
C-6.2: Continue to develop and maintain long-range capital improvement
City submits an annual report to OCTA for Measure M2 eligibility
programs consistent with the General Plan and M2 eligibility requirements.
C-6.3: Coordinate with OCTA to fund, develop, and maintain a Master
Plan of Streets and Highways consistent with the Master Plan of Arterial
Ongoing.
Highways MPAH .
C-6.4: Require a locally collected and administered traffic mitigation fee
program to guarantee that new development pays for its fair share toward
City will be updating the traffic impact fee over the next few months (late
improvements resulting in reductions in air pollutant and GHG emissions
2017).
and traffic impacts generated by the development.
C-6.5: Actively pursue local, State, and federal funding to implement,
Ongoing.
maintain, and evaluate the transportation and infrastructures stem.
C-6.6: Supplement funding from annual fees or assessments on existing
Ongoing.
and new development with grants and other nonlocal sources.
C-6.7: Develop strategies to implement an infrastructure and
transportation system to be consistent with State policies on resiliency and
Ongoing.
sustainability.
C-6.8: Amend the General Plan, if necessary, to be responsive to
evolving funding requirements and to comply with State and federal
As needed and ongoing.
regulations affecting the goals and policies of the Circulation Element.
C-6.9: Coordinate with OCTA and Caltrans to seek funding and
implementation solutions to improve Newport Boulevard at the terminus of
Staff to meet with OCTA to review options for improving SR -55.
the State Route 55 freeway to relieve congestion from regional traffic.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13' Edition) Page 26
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
C-6.10: Review the City's transportation impact fee program on a regular
An update of the fee program will be conducted in late 2017. Periodic
basis, and adjust fees as needed to ensure that funding is available for
reviews will be conducted.
tanned transportation improvements that will benefit all travel modes.
C-6.11: Prioritize funding and timing for implementing transportation
improvements. Consider prioritizing multimodal projects that provide the
Ongoing.
most benefit to all users.
C-6.12: Require that every new development project pay its share of costs
Ongoing.
associated with the mitigation of project generated impacts.
C-6.13: Measure M2 sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace
Measure M2 requires that M2 funds do not supplant developer fee
private funding which has been committed for any project.
requirements.
C-6.14: The City's seven-year capital improvement program shall be
adopted and maintained in conformance with the provisions of Measure
Ongoing.
M2 for the purpose of maintaining the established level of service
standard.
C-6.15: Maintain a traffic impact fee for circulation system improvements
to the Master Plan of Streets and Highways; review and update fees on a
Ongoing.
regular basis.
Objective C-6113: Evaluate the transportations stem to ensure that it meets the City's circulation goals.
C-6.16: Provide an annual Capital Improvement Program General Plan
The CIP is annually reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to its
consistency report.
adoption to ensure consistency with General Plan.
C-6.17: Provide annual public review of implementation status reports of
Ongoing.
goals, policies, and objectives stated in the Circulation Element.
C-6.18: Adopt and seek out methods and processes that provide
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
appropriate and accurate data for evaluating the performance of the
annual review.
transportation and infrastructures stem.
Goal C-7: Promote a Friendly Active Transportation System in Costa Mesa
Bikeways and Pedestrian Paths
Objective C -7A: Expand, enhance, and protect the existing bicycle and pedestrian network to provide a comprehensive, system of Class 1,
Class 11, Class III, and Class IV facilities to increase connectivity between homes, 'obs, schools transit, and recreational resources in Costa Mesa.
Recommendation C-7.1: Develop an extensive bicycle and
A conceptual Bicycle Master Plan was developed as part of General Plan
pedestrian backbone network through the use of standard and appropriate
Update. This will be further reviewed by the Committee and public and
innovative treatments.
submitted to City Council for adoption.
Recommendation C-7.2: Plan and install new bicycle lanes on
Ongoing.
Major Arterials, where feasible and appropriate.
Recommendation C-7.3: Plan and install shared lane markings
("sharrows") and signage on appropriate existing and planned bicycle
Ongoing.
routes where bicycle lane implementation is demonstrated to be infeasible.
Recommendation C-7.4: Where feasible, Class I shared -use paths
Ongoing.
should be a priority for future developments.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 27
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Recommendation C-7.5: Plan and install new shared -use paths in
Study of bicycle trail along Paularino Channel is proposed for Fiscal Year
utility corridors and/or along flood control channels, and extend existing
2017-18 budget.
bicycle and shared -use paths.
Recommendation C-7.6: Plan and complete north/south multi-
purpose and bicycle routes through the City to augment the east/west
Ongoing.
route.
Recommendation C-7.7: Consider the identification and feasibility
Design of Merrimac Way Class IV is proposed for Fiscal Year 2017-18
of potential Class IV cycle tracks.
budget.
Recommendation C-7.8: When feasible, implement the completion
through regional coordination of the Costa Mesa roadway and trail
Ongoing.
segments of regional bikeway plans.
Recommendation C-7.9: Encourage reallocation of roadway rights-
of-way where appropriate to accommodate shared -use path and bicycle
Ongoing.
facilities, while preserving and respecting the character of each adjacent
neighborhood.
Recommendation C-7.10: Support bicycle improvement projects that
close gaps in the regional bicycle network either by implementing specific
Ongoing.
projects recommended in the Plan or through other treatments.
Recommendation C-7.11: Encourage bicycle projects that connect
Ongoing.
local facilities and neighborhoods to major bicycle corridors.
Recommendation C-7.12: Work cooperatively with adjoining
jurisdictions and local/regional agencies to coordinate bicycle planning,
Ongoing.
and implementation activities. Where required, develop consistent active
transportation plans and policies with regional and adjacent agencies.
Recommendation C-7.13: Prioritize safe access to major regional
trails such as the OC Loop/Santa Ana River Trail and the Newport Back
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
Bay Trail System. Where feasible, plan and provide a continuous low-
annual review.
stress Class I and/or Class IV facility from east to west across the city
between these facilities.
Recommendation C-7.14: Explore favorable opportunities to remove
Ongoing.
parking to accommodate bicycle lanes.
Recommendation C-7.15: Identify favorable opportunities to retain
Ongoing.
parallel parking adjacent to sidewalks to maintain pedestrian safety.
Recommendation C-7.16: Consider every street in Costa Mesa as a
Ongoing.
street that cyclists could use.
Recommendation C-7.17: Link on -road and off-road bicycle and
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
pedestrian facilities within Costa Mesa to existing and planned facilities in
annual review.
adjacent and regional jurisdictions.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13"' Edition)
Page 28
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Recommendation C-7.18: Low -stress design techniques should be
Ongoing.
considered where necessary to attract a wide variety of users.
Recommendation C-7.19: Establish designated safe routes to
Safe Route to School routes designated and provided to schools and
schools for biking and walking.
posted online.
Recommendation C-7.20: Designate walkable districts in the City.
On oin .
Bike and Pedestrian Facilities
Objective C-713: Provide end -of -trip facilities that support the bicycle network.
Recommendation C-7.21: Provide bike parking and bike -related
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
amenities at public facilities and along public rights-of-way.
annual review.
Recommendation C-7.22: Pursue public-private partnerships to
furnish local businesses with secure bike parking and other related
Ongoing.
amenities.
Recommendation C-7.23: Develop and adopt bicycle parking
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
equipment standards for bicycle parking to be installed within the public
annual review.
right-of-way and post on the City website.
Recommendation C-7.24: Work with local schools and colleges to
provide ample and secure bike parking and other related amenities for
Ongoing.
students and employees.
Recommendation C-7.25: Work with OCTA to maximize bicycle
amenities, such as bus stop solar lighting and bicycle lockers, at high-
Ongoing.
volume transit stops.
Recommendation C-7.26: Prioritize the installation of bicycle -scale
Pedestrian lighting provided along Harbor Cornerstone Bicycle Trail.
and/orpedestrian-scale lighting.
Recommendation C-7.27: Encourage and incentivize providing
attended bicycle parking services, such as a bicycle valet, at major City
Encouraged provision of bicycle parking at OC Fair and at Chargers
events, OC Fair, Farmers' Markets, holiday festivals, and other community
Training Camp.
events.
Recommendation C-7.28: Prioritize schools with the highest auto
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
traffic volume during peak hours and insufficient parking for staff and
annual review.
parents. Plan and install bicycle facilities adjacent those schools.
Recommendation C-7.29: Provide bike parking and bike -related
Bicycle racks are being proposed at several city facilities including parks
amenities at public facilities and along public right-of-way.
and libraries.
"First and Last Mile" Programs
Objective C -7C: Encourage sustainable modes of transportation to fill gaps between the first and last miles of trips (walking, biking, ride sharing,
transit, taxi and car -sharing).
Recommendation C-7.30: Identify citywide infrastructure needed to
Ongoing.
create the interconnected multi -trails stem.
Recommendation C-7.31: Improve the quality, aesthetics, and
Ongoing.
safety of high -use pedestrian corridors.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 29
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Recommendation C-7.32: Development and implement a bicycle
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
sharing system.
annual review.
Recommendation C-7.33: Proposed new mode split goals:
• 50 percent motor vehicles
• 10 percent transit
• 10 percent bicycles
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
• 20 percent walking
annual review.
• 10 percent carpools, taxi, transportation network company services,
and car sharing
Recommendation C-7.34: Establish a goal for all trips of less than
three miles to be 30 percent by bicycle, and establish a goal of less than 1
Ongoing.
mile to be 30 percent by walking.
Recommendation C-7.35: Consider implementing a small-scale
A new transit shuttle service was initiated connecting South Coast Metro
transportation system to encourage mode shift to popular destinations as
Area, South Coast Plaza and LAB/Camp.
defined by users.
Goal C-8: Create a Safer Place to Walk and Ride a Bicycle
Design and Way -finding
Objective C -8A: Develop bicycle and pedestrian facilities with approved uniform design standards, and implementation of way -finding signage
providing information on various destinations.
Recommendation C-8.1: Require that all facilities be designed in
Ongoing.
accordance with the latest federal, state, and local standards.
Recommendation C-8.2: Provide and maintain bicycle and
pedestrian signal detectors, informational signage, and lighting, along City
Ongoing.
bikeways.
Recommendation C-8.3: Develop, install and maintain a bicycle
and pedestrian way -finding signage program to indicate route turns, the
Ongoing.
presence of intersecting bikeways, streets and distances to nearby local
and major destinations.
Recommendation C-8.4: Develop a list of acceptable plant
materials for shared use paths that will not damage, create security
problems or hazards for bicyclists. Incorporate canopy trees and native,
Ongoing.
drought -tolerant landscaping as a standard Class I facility (shared use
path) feature. Encourage the use of sustainable drainage designs, such as
bio-swales.
Recommendation C-8.5: Utilize Complete Streets elements as
demonstrated in most recent versions of National Association of City
Ongoing.
Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Street Design Guide and Bikeway
Design Guide.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13t' Edition) Page 30
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Recommendation C-8.6: Crosswalks will include high visibility Ongoing.
crossing treatments.
Recommendation C-8.7: Paint direction arrows on all bike lanes Ongoing.
and bike paths to reduce the risk of collisions.
Safety Enforcement and Reporting
Obiective C -81B: Continue and expand enforcement activities that enhance safety of bicyclists on bike paths and roadways.
Recommendation C-8.8: Enforce laws that reduce
bicycle/pedestrian/motor vehicle incidents and conflicts.
Recommendation C-8.9: Train police officers on bicyclists' rights
and responsibilities and bicycle/pedestrian/vehicle collision evaluation.
Recommendation C-8.10: Utilize the City's bicycle -mounted patrol
officer program to educate and enforce pedestrian and bicycle user
violations not necessarily to punish, but to correct.
Recommendation C-8.11: Promote efficient reporting mechanisms
for behaviors that endanger cyclists and pedestrians.
Recommendation C-8.12: Develop a partnership with the school
community to establish and update suggested routes to schools for biking
and walking.
Safe Roadway Conditions
Objective C -8C: Maintain bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are
Recommendation C-8.13: Establish routine maintenance
schedule/standards for bicycle and pedestrian facilities such as sweeping,
litter removal, landscaping, repainting of striping, signage, and signal
actuation devices.
Recommendation C-8.14: Encourage and empower citizens to
report maintenance issues that impact bicyclist and pedestrian safety
including, but not limited to, potholes, sidewalk lifting, and overgrown
vegetation.
Recommendation C-8.15: Establish procedures for responding to
citizen reports in a timely manner.
Recommendation C-8.16: Where feasible, reduce or eliminate
conflict points such as driveways that cross the sidewalk.
Safety Education
Objective C-811): Increase education of bicycle and pedestrian safe
Recommendation C-8.17: Create, fund, and implement bicycle -
safety curricula and provide to the public, tourists, various ethnic groups,
diverse ages and disadvantaged communities.
Ongoing.
Ongoing.
Ongoing.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
annual review.
Suggested Routes to School maps were provided to all schools. An
updated bicycle education program will be implemented in the upcoming
fiscal year.
clear of debris and
Ongoing.
safe conditions for all users.
Costa Mesa Connect includes provision to notify bicycle -related issues to
the City.
Ongoing.
Ongoing.
through programs and training of school children and the
Funding included for bicycle education in FY 17-18.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1311 Edition) Page 31
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Recommendation C-8.18: Provide multilingual bicycle -safety maps
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
and brochures (print and electronic versions) in languages that are widely
annual review.
used in Costa Mesa.
Recommendation C-8.19: Encourage schools to develop and
provide bicycle -safety curricula for use in elementary, middle, and high
Funding included for bicycle education in FY 17-18.
schools, such as the Bicycle Rodeo events.
Recommendation C-8.20: Support marketing and public awareness
Ongoing.
campaigns aimed at improving bicycle and pedestrian safety.
Recommendation C-8.21: Provide a user education program
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
developed and promoted to encourage proper trail use and etiquette.
annual review.
Recommendation C-8.22: Work with local bicycle advocacy
organizations to develop, promote and support a series of bicycle
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
education classes. Include information on bicycle safety, maintenance,
annual review.
and security.
Recommendation C-8.23: Develop and distribute education material
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
regarding bicycle and pedestrian responsibilities and laws.
annual review.
Safety Data
Objective C -8E: Monitor and analyze bicycle and pedestrian safety.
Recommendation C-8.24: Request bicycle and pedestrian collision
reports from local law enforcement periodically and consider
Ongoing.
improvements to address problem areas.
Recommendation C-8.25: Establish an expedited process to report
maintenance and safety concerns, e.g. pavement markings (sharrows,
missing bike lane lines), ramps, curb cut-outs, broken walk/bike signal
Funding included in FY 17-18 budget for implementation of bicycle
buttons, signage, minor maintenance of bike lanes/paths (street/path
markings including sharrows for several segments.
sweeping, minor surface patching, inoperable traffic signal bicycle
detection).
Recommendation C-8.26: Conduct Roadside Safety Audits (RSAs)
on a regular basis to provide periodic snapshots of roadway safety,
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
including bicycle, pedestrian, equestrian, skateboard, and other non-
annual review.
motorized modes of travel.
Goal C-9: Integrate Active Transportation Elements into Circulation System and Land Use Planning
Land Use Planning Decisions and Active Transportation
Objective C -9A: Consider bicycle and pedestrian facilities during land use planning process.
Recommendation C-9.1: Incorporate the Costa Mesa Bicycle and
Consultant selected to conduct this effort.
Pedestrian Master Plan into the City's General Plan.
Recommendation C-92: Ensure that all current and proposed land
The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is part of overall City's General
use planning is consistent with the Costa Mesa Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plan Circulation Element.
Master Plan.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 32
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Recommendation C-9.3: Require new developments provide
Ongoing.
adequate bicycle parking and pedestrian access.
Recommendation C-9.4: Collaborate with property owners to
Ongoing.
increase bicycle parking over time.
Recommendation C-9.5: Encourage the integration of compatible
land uses and housing into major development projects to reduce vehicle
Ongoing
use.
Recommendation C-9.6: Provide a fully integrated network of
Secured grant from OCTA Project V to implement transit shuttle between
modern active transportation facilities to and from major activity centers
South Coast Plaza area and LAB/Camp.
and residential centers.
Recommendation C-9.7: Identify areas where an increase in the
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
need for active transportation can reasonably be anticipated due to
annual review.
housing/business growth.
Recommendation C-9.8: Make commercial and recreational areas
more enjoyable for pedestrians by implementing measures such as
Ongoing.
providing shade, planting trees, eliminating visible parking lots and vacant
land, and minimizing long stretches of building fa ade.
Recommendation C-9.9: Develop creative, artistic, and functional
bicycle parking solutions, and install them throughout the City as a
Ongoing.
standard.
Active Transportation in Developments
Objective C-9113: Integrate bicycle and pedestrian facility im rovements during planning, design and implementation of transportation projects.
Recommendation C-9.10: Promote the preservation of bicycle
access within all roadway rights-of-way, as well as the development of
Ongoing.
innovative, safety -enhanced on -street facilities, such as bicycle boulevards
and cycle tracks.
Recommendation C-9.11: Establish bike boulevards on streets with
Bicycle Boulevards will be identified in the upcoming fiscal year.
low traffic volumes and slowspeeds to encourage bicycling.
Recommendation C-9.12: Proactively seek new opportunities for
acquisition of abandoned rights-of-way and other lands for the
Ongoing.
development of new multi -use pathways that integrate with the planned
network.
Recommendation C-9.13: Improve the safety of all road users
Traffic calming improvements are currently being implemented on East
through the implementation of neighborhood traffic -calming treatments.
19th Street.
Recommendation C-9.14 Detours through or around construction
zones should be designed for safety and convenience, and with adequate
Ongoing.
signage for cyclists and pedestrians.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 33
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Recommendation C-9.15: Provide opportunity for public input prior
to the removal of an existing bicycle or pedestrian facility or the approval
Ongoing.
of any development or street improvement that would preclude these
tanned facilities.
Goal C-10: Promote an Active Transportation Culture
An Active Transportation Culture
Objective C -10A: Encourage more people to walk and bicycle by supporting programs that foster community support for bicycling and walking, and
raise public awareness about active transportation.
Recommendation C-10.1: Support marketing and public awareness
campaigns through a variety of media aimed at promoting bicycling and
Staff will be promoting bicycle parking at events such as Orange County
walking as a safe, healthy, cost-effective, environmentally friendly
Fair, Chargers Training Camp and other large events.
transportation choice.
Recommendation C-10.2: Support programs aimed at increasing
bicycle and walk trips by providing incentives, recognition, or services that
Ongoing.
make bicycling and walking a more convenient transportation mode.
Recommendation C-10.3: Promote bicycling and walking at City -
sponsored and public events, such as Earth Day, Bike to Work
Staff will work with event organizers to promote bicycle parking and
Day/Month, farmers' markets, public health fairs, art walks, craft fairs, and
access.
civic events.
Recommendation C-10.4: Encourage and promote bicycle related
businesses within Costa Mesa including, but not limited to, involvement of
Ongoing.
civic clubs and organizations.
Recommendation C-10.5: Promote active transportation events in
Costa Mesa to raise awareness and encourage bicycling, including, but
Ongoing.
not limited to, those that may involve temporary road closures, bike to
work/school, senior walks, historic walks, and ciclovias.
Recommendation C-10.6: Encourage major employment centers
and employers to promote commuting by bicycle including the use of flex-
time work schedules to support non -rush bicycle commuting. Build a
Ongoing.
coalition with City, businesses, schools, and residents to promote active
transportation.
Recommendation C-10.7: Encourage participation in bicycle and
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
pedestrian promotion activities by education facilities, arts programs,
annual review.
active transportation clubs, and entertainment providers.
Recommendation C-10.8: Achieve "Silver Level Bicycle Friendly
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
Community" by League of American Bicyclists by 2025.
annual review.
Recommendation C-10.9: Achieve "Walk Friendly Community"
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
status from WalkFriendly.org by 2025.
annual review.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 34
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Recommendation C-10.10: Achieve "HEAL City" designation by 2017.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
annual review.
Goal C-11: Promote the Positive Air Quality, Health, and Economic Benefits of Active Transportation
Improving the Environment with Active Transportation
Objective C -11A: Improve air quality and public health and reduce ambient noise by promotingActive Transportation programs.
Recommendation C-11.1: Determine baseline emissions levels,
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
then track and communicate changes in emissions as modes of
annual review.
transportation trips shift to encourage more walking and biking.
Recommendation C-11.2: Improve the quality of life in Costa Mesa
Ongoing.
by reducing neighborhood traffic and noise.
Recommendation C-11.3: Increase pedestrian and bicycle trips,
Ongoing.
thereby reducing vehicle trips and vehicle miles Traveled.
Recommendation C-11.4: Coordinate with appropriate federal, state,
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
and county health agencies on active transportation programs to achieve
annual review.
health benefits.
Economic and Other Incentives
Objective C-11 B: Provide economic incentives for expanding and enhancing bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Recommendation C-11.5: Incentivize the business community to
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
support pedestrians and bicycle users in tangible ways.
annual review.
Recommendation C-11.6: Partner with the business and school
communities to create a marketing strategy to encourage individual
Ongoing.
businesses to market Costa Mesa as a bicycle -friendly City.
Recommendation C-11.7: Encourage developers to include
features, amenities and programs that are proven to increase walking
Ongoing.
and/or bicycling.
Recommendation C-11.8: Offer incentives for businesses whose
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
employees walk or bike to work.
annual review.
Recommendation C-11.9: Encourage the Chamber of Commerce
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
and the business community to promote active transportation in
annual review.
commercial areas to stimulate economic vitality.
Goal C-12: Monitor, Evaluate, and Pursue Funding for Implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Objective 12A: Continuously monitor and evaluate Costa Mesa's implementation progress on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan policies,
programs, and projects.
Recommendation C-12.1: Establish a monitoring program to
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
measure the effectiveness and benefits of the Costa Mesa Bicycle and
annual review.
Pedestrian Master Plan.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13th Edition) Page 35
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Recommendation C-12.2: Track citywide trends in active
transportation through the use of Census data, bicycle and pedestrian
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
counts, travel surveys, and online surveys as part of annual reviews of the
annual review.
General Plan.
Recommendation C-12.3: Ensure that Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan programs and projects are implemented in an equitable
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
manner geographically, socioeconomically, and serving disadvantaged
annual review.
communities.
Fund the Plans
Objective C-126: Pursue grants and other sources of funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects.
Recommendation C-12.4: Strategize use of resources on
developing effective and efficient grant application and program
Ongoing.
administration.
Recommendation C-12.5: Pursue multiple sources of funding and
support efforts to maintain or increase federal, state and local funding for
Ongoing.
the implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
Recommendation C-12.6: Consider designating a portion of
Staff will initiate discussions with traffic impact fee committee on this item.
development traffic impact fees to fund bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal GM -1: Inter -jurisdictional Coordination
Objective GM -1A: Coordinate land use and transportation planning policies with State, regional, and local growth management efforts.
GM -1.1 Cooperate with the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA) and other jurisdictions on development, all future regional
Ongoing.
transportation plans, and land use planning on a countywide basis.
GM -1.2: Coordinate population, housing, and employment projections
with the State Department of Finance, Southern California Association of
Ongoing. Annual report are provided to CDR, SCAG and Dept. of Finance
Governments, Center for Demographic Research, Newport -Mesa Unified
and Newport Mesa Unified for potential growth in the City.
School District, and County of Orange agencies in terms of infrastructure
planning.
GM -1.3: Work with inter -jurisdictional forums such as the City -County
Coordinating Committee to make sure that the City's fees are consistent
Ongoing.
with minimally acceptable impact fees in the region.
GM -1.4: Participate in inter -jurisdictional planning forums to discuss
implementation of traffic improvements, cooperative land use planning,
Ongoing.
and appropriate mitigation measures for developments with
multijurisdictional impacts.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 36
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
GM -1.5: Continue to require that any new large developments prepare a
master plan and environmental impact analysis. This allows the City to
anticipate the impacts of large projects prior to development of any portion
Ongoing.
and permits more time to plan for public services and facilities needed to
support the project.
Goal GM -2: Integration of Land Use and Transportation Planning
Objective GM -2A: Maintain the Level of Service standards by integration of land use and transportation planning
GM -2.1: Ensure that land use designations are reflected in the sub -
regional county model and SCAG's model through consistent assumptions
Ongoing.
and methodologies.
GM -2.2: Coordinate with State, county, and local agencies for planning
and construction of public utilities to minimize negative impacts on the
Ongoing.
circulations stem.
GM -2.3: Use the Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring
Program to assess the impact of existing and new development on the
Ongoing.
circulations stem.
GM -2.4: Support uses and development which create synergistic
relationships with neighboring uses and development, especially those
Ongoing.
whose addition does not create mutually exclusive additional vehicular
trips but adds to the value of the destination by any potential visitor.
GM -2.5: Support creative and flexible solutions that provide for additional
economic or physical growth within the City but does not place greater
impact on the circulation system. These would include shared parking
Ongoing.
agreements, offset hours of operation, and clustering of harmonious and
supportive uses.
HOUSING ELEMENT
Goal HOU-1: Preservation and Enhancement
Preserve the availability of existing housing opportunities and conserve as well as enhance the quality of existing dwelling units and residential
neighborhoods.
HOU-1.1: Develop standard and/or guidelines for new development with
Ongoing. This is a standard condition of approval for new multiple family
emphasis on site (including minimum site security lighting) and building
residential developments.
design to minimize vulnerability to criminal activity.
There have been no new development affecting stabilized residential
HOU-1.2: Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including
neighborhoods or mobile home parks. The City has taken additional
but not limited to mobile home parks and manufactured home parks, from
action to protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including (i)
the encroachment of incompatible or potentially disruptive land uses
adoption of a Multiple Family Group Home Ordinance on November 17,
and/or activities.
2015 to limit the number and concentration of group homes and sober
living facilities in the Multiple Family Residential zones.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13« Edition) Page 37
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
HOU-1.3: Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or
Ongoing through the implementation and enforcement of Title 20 —
abandoned vehicles, outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal building
Property Maintenance, of the Municipal Code. Title 20 establishes
and establish regulations to abate weed -filled yards when any of the
standards to ensure proper maintenance, removal of hazardous and
above is deemed to constitute a health, safety or fire hazard.
improper storage, and removal of weeds and other public nuisances.
HOU-1.4: Establish code enforcement as a high priority and provide
Ongoing.
adequate funding and staffing to support code enforcement programs.
HOU-1.5: Install and upgrade public service facilities (streets, alleys, and
utilities) to encourage increased private market investments in declining or
Ongoing as funding is available.
deteriorating neighborhoods.
HOU-1.6: Continue existing rehabilitation loan and grant programs for
Ongoing as funding is available.
low and moderate -income homeowners as long as funds are available.
HOU-1.7: Minimize the displacement of existing residences due to public
Ongoing.
projects.
HOU-1.8: Encourage the development of housing that fulfills specialized
Ongoing.
needs.
Goal HOU-2: Preserving and Expanding Affordable Housing Opportunities
Provide a range of housing choices for all social and economic segments of the community, including housing for persons with special needs.
HOU-2.1: Encourage concurrent applications (i.e., rezones, tentative
tract maps, conditional use permits, variance request, etc.) if multiple
Ongoing. Applications for multiple family residential projects requiring
approvals are required, and if consistent with applicable processing
multiple approvals are generally processed concurrently.
requirements.
HOU-2.2: Promote the use of State density bonus provisions to
All units under density bonus agreements with the City are monitored on
encourage the development of affordable housing for lower and moderate
an annual basis.
income households, as well as senior housing.
HOU-2.3: Provide incentive bonus units to encourage the redevelopment
of residential units that are nonconforming in terms of density. The
incentive shall be limited to the multi -family residential land use
designations. The density incentive shall be limited to an increase of 25
Ongoing.
percent above the Medium -Density or an increase of 50 percent above
High -Density. In no case shall the resulting number of units exceed the
existing number of units on each site.
HOU-2.4: Encourage developers to employ innovative or alternative
construction methods to reduce housing costs and increase housing
Ongoing.
supply.
HOU-2.5: Continue membership in the Orange County Housing Authority
Ongoing.
to provide rental assistance to very low income households.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 38
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
HOU-2.6: Provide clear rules, policies, and procedures, for reasonable
The Zoning Code includes regulations that address reasonable
accommodation in order to promote equal access to housing. Policies and
accommodation per State requirements. In March of 2013, the City
procedures should be ministerial and include but not be limited to
adopted an Ordinance, in accordance with Senate Bill 2, to permit
identifying who may request a reasonable accommodation (i.e., persons
emergency shelters by right in the Planned Development Industrial zone.
with disabilities, family -members, landlords, etc.), timeframes for decision-
The Ordinance also created provisions for transitional housing and
making, and provisions for relief from the various land -use, zoning, or
supportive housing that would allow these uses to be subject only to those
building regulations that ma constrain the housing for persons of
restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the
disabilities.
same zone.
HOU-2.7: Monitor the implementation of the City's ordinances, codes,
policies, and procedures to ensure they comply with the "reasonable
Ongoing.
accommodation" for disable provisions and all fair housing laws.
Goal HOU-3: Provisions of Adequate Sites
Provide adequate, suitable sites for residential use and development or maintenance of a range of housing that varies sufficiently in terms of cost,
design, size, location, and tenure to meet the housing needs of al segment of the community at a level that can be supported by infrastructure.
HOU-3.1: Encourage the conversion of existing marginal or vacant
Ongoing. In 2006, the City adopted three Urban Plans to encourage the
motels, commercial, and/or industrial land to residential, where feasible
conversion of existing marginal or vacant industrial land in the West Side
and consistent with environmental conditions that are suitable for new
to mixed-use and residential developments.
residential development.
HOU-3.2: Provide opportunities for the development of well planned and
designed project which, through vertical or horizontal integration, provide
Reviewed and considered with development projects
for the development of compatible residential, commercial, industrial,
institutional, or public uses within a single project or neighborhood.
HOU-3.3: Cooperate with large employers, the Chamber of Commerce,
and major commercial and industrial developers to identify and implement
programs to balance employment growth with the ability to provide
Ongoing.
housing opportunities affordable to the incomes of the newly created job
opportunities.
HOU-3.4: Consider the potential impact on housing opportunities and
existing residential neighborhoods when reviewing rezone petitions
Ongoing and reviewed for all rezone applications.
affecting residential properties.
HOU-3.5: Encourage transit -oriented development along transportation
Ongoing.
corridors.
Goal HOU-4: Equal Housing Opportunity
Ensure that all existing and future housing opportunities are open and available to all social and economic segments of the community without
discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability/medical conditions, national origin or ancestry, marital status, age,
household composition or size, source of income, or any other arbitrary factors.
HOU-4.1: Support the intent and spirit of equal housing opportunities as
Ongoing (refer to Table C).
express in Federal and State fair housing laws.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 39
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
HOU-4.2: Continue to provide fair housing and counseling services for all
Costa Mesa residents in an effort to remove barriers and promote access
Ongoing (refer to Table C).
to affordable housing in the City.
HOU-4.3: Encourage programs that address the housing needs of senior
citizens.
The 2013-2021 Housing Element was adopted by City Council on January
HOU-4.4: Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and
preservation of residential developments which will meet the needs of
21, 2014. The draft was certified by California Department of Housing and
families and individuals with specialized housing requirements.
Community Development on November 22, 2013 in meeting statuary
requirements. The Housing Element includes special programs for special
HOU-4.5: Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and
preservation of residential developments to meet the needs of the
housing needs (i.e., seniors, large families, etc.).
developmentally disabled.
Goal HOU-5: Coordination and Cooperation
Coordinate local housing efforts with appropriate federal, state, regional, and local governments and/or agencies and to cooperate in the
implementation of intergovernmental housing programs to ensure maximum effectiveness in solving local and regional housing problems.
HOU-5.1: Investigate alternative intergovernmental arrangements and
Ongoing.
program options to deal with area -wide housing issues and problems.
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Goal CON -1: Preserved and Restored Natural Coastal Habitat and Landforms
Objective CON -1.A: Evaluate existing biotic resources and preserve them in ecologically viable and natural conditions, where possible; and/or
restore and integrate these resources into the urban environment, where feasible.
CON -1.A.1: Natural habitat is essential to ensuring biodiversity and
protecting sensitive biological resources. Protect these areas and consult
with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Orange County Water
Ongoing.
District, Orange County Parks, and other regional agencies to identify
areas for special protection, and establish appropriate protection
measures for these areas.
CON -1.A.2: Contribute to regional biodiversity and the preservation of
rare, unique, and sensitive biological resources by maintaining functional
Ongoing.
wildlife corridors and habitat linkages.
CON -1.A.3: Coordinate with the United States Fish and Wildlife service,
the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other regulatory
Ongoing.
agencies to mitigate project impacts affecting open and naturals aces.
CON -1.A.4: Promote and protect native plant species within Fairview
Multiple, free, City sponsored invasive species cleanup events and local
Park, and remove and control the spread of invasive species, including
natural resource and wildlife education events have taken place at
plants, animals, and fungi.
Fairview Park through the assistance Of the Institute of Conservation,
Research and Education ICRE in 2016 and 2017.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13tH Edition) Page 40
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
CON -1.A.5: Ensure that all future development is reviewed with regard to
protecting natural topography and bluffs to preserve and enhance Costa
Mesa's natural beauty.
CON -1.A.6: Minimize soil depletion and erosion in development projects.
Prevent erosion caused by construction activities, and encourage
preservation of natural vegetation and topography.
CON -1.A.7: Improve access to large-scale natural areas in the City.
These areas should be open for controlled access to improve public
enjoyment. Access should be limited where natural habitat is extremely
sensitive. Work with transit agencies to improve connections and access
to open space and recreation facilities from all Costa Mesa
CON -1.A.8: Require the provision of adequate visitor -serving on-site
parking facilities that do no impact sensitive resources within the Coastal
Zone.
CON -1.A.9: Coordinate the development of plans, policies, and design
standards for projects within the Coastal Zone with appropriate local,
regional, and federal agencies.
Goal CON -2: Conserved Natural Resources through Environmental Sus
Ob'ective CON -2.A: Work to conserve enerav resources in existina a
Description of City Action
Ongoing as developments are submitted for review and approval.
Ongoing as developments are submitted for approval. Erosion control
plans are required with all grading permits.
This is a new General Plan policy that has been in effect for 6 months.
These policies would require further studies and coordination with other
agencies. Additional information will be provided with the 2017 annual
update.
The Coastal Zone is within Talbert Regional Park. All improvements are
consistent with the Parks Master Plan and will be coordinated with the
local, state and federal agencies.
The Coastal Zone is within Talbert Regional Park. All improvements are
consistent with the Parks Master Plan and will be coordinated with the
local, state and federal agencies.
tainability
nd new buildin s, utilities, and infrastructure.
Ongoing as development is submitted for review for private development.
The library project, involves construction of a new two -story 22,860 SF
CON -2.A.1: Promote efficient use of energy and conservation of library The new library designed to achieve a U.S. Green Building Council
available resources in the design, construction, maintenance, and (USGBC) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design
operation of public and private facilities, infrastructure, and equipment. (LEED) rating of Gold and renovation of the existing 8,740 SF Donald
Dungan Library to achieve a USGBC LEED rating of Silver.
CON -2.A.2: Consult with regional agencies and utility companies to
pursue energy efficiency goals. Expand renewable energy strategies to
reach zero net energy for both residential and commercial new
construction.
CON -2.A.3: Continue to develop partnerships with participating
jurisdictions to promote energy efficiency, energy conservation, and
renewable energy resource development by leveraging the abilities of
local governments to strengthen and reinforce the capacity of energy
efficiency efforts.
CON -2.A.4: Encourage new development to take advantage of Costa
Mesa's optimal climate in the warming and cooling of buildings, including
use of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2017
annual update.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
annual review.
Ongoing.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
CON -2.A.5: Promote environmentally sustainable development principles
for buildings, master planned communities, neighborhoods, and Ongoing.
infrastructure.
CON -2.A.6: Encourage construction and building development practices Ongoing.
that reduce resource expenditures throughout the lifecvcle of a structure.
CON -2.A.7: Continue to require all City facilities and services to
incorporate energy and resource conservation standards and practices
and require that new municipal facilities be built within the LEED Gold
standards or equivalent.
CON -2.A.8: Continue City green initiatives in purchases of equipment,
and agreements that favor sustainable products and practices.
CON -2.A.9 Encourage waste management programs that promote waste
reduction and recycling to minimize materials sent to landfills. Maintain
robust programs encourage residents and businesses to reduce, reuse,
recycle, and compost.
CON -2.A.10 Support waste management practices that provide recycling
programs. Promote organic recycling, landfill diversion, zero waste goals,
proper hazardous waste collections, composting, and the continuance of
recvcling centers.
CON -2.A.11 Continue construction and demolition programs that require
recycling and minimize waste in haul trips.
Page 41
The library project, involves construction of a new two -story 22,860 SF
library The new library designed to achieve a U.S. Green Building Council
(USGBC) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design
(LEED) rating of Gold and renovation of the existing 8,740 SF Donald
Dungan Library to achieve a USGBC LEED ratina of Silver.
Ongoing.
Ongoing and required with all building permits. For demolition, grading, or
building permits involving projects with a valuation of $10,000 or more, the
contractor is required to use a City -Permitted Waste Hauler(s) to haul any
debris or soiled waste from the iobsite.
Costa Mesa Sanitation District provides organic recycling programs.
Ongoing and required with all building permits. For demolition, grading, or
building permits involving projects with a valuation of $10,000 or more, the
contractor is required to use a City -Permitted Waste Hauler(s) to haul any
debris or soiled waste from the iobsite.
Goal CON -3: Improved Water Supply and Quality
Objective CON -3.A: Work towards the protection and conservation of existing and future water resources by recognizing water as a limited resource
that requires conservation.
CON -3.A.1: Continue to consult with local water districts and the Orange
County Water District to ensure reliable, adequate, and high-quality Ongoing.
sources of water supply at a reasonable cost.
CON -3.A.2: Encourage residents, public facilities, businesses, and
industry to minimize water consumption, especially during drought vears.
CON -3.A.3: Restrict use of turf in new construction and landscape
reinstallation that requires high irrigation demands, except for area parks
and schools, and encourage the use of drought -tolerant landscaping.
Ongoing. The City adopted the amendment to Water Efficient Landscape
Guidelines in 2015 that has been in effect for more than 7 years.
Ongoing. The City adopted the amendment to Water Efficient Landscape
Guidelines in 2015 that has been in effect for more than 7 years.
Compliance with the guidelines minimizes use of turf for commercial and
residential projects.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 42
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
CON-3.AA: Consult with local water districts and the Orange County
Water District to advance water recycling program for new and existing
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
developments, including the use of treated wastewater to irrigate parks,
annual review.
golf courses, roadway landscaping, and other intensive irrigation
consumers.
CON -3.A.5: Work with public and private property owners to reduce
stormwater runoff in urban areas to protect water quality in storm drainage
Ongoing.
channels, the Santa Ana River, and other local water courses that lead to
the Pacific Ocean.
CON -3.A.6: Continue to develop strategies to promote stormwater
management techniques and storm drain diversion programs that
Ongoing
collectively and naturally filter urban runoff.
CON -3.A.7: Continue to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Program (NPDES) by participating in the Countywide
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), which stipulates water quality
Ongoing for all new and rehabilitation projects
requirements for minimizing urban runoff and discharge from new
development and requires the provisions of applicable Best Management
Practices (BMP).
CON -3.A.8: Require that all applicable development projects be reviewed
with regards to requirements of both the on-site Water Quality
Ongoing for all new and rehabilitation projects
Management Plan and State requirements for runoff and obtaining a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPPpermit.
CON -3.A.9: Continue to consult with the Costa Mesa Sanitation District
and the Orange County Sanitation District to modernize wastewater
Ongoing.
treatment facilities to avoid overflows of untreated sewage.
Goal CON -4: Improved Air Quality
Objective CON -4.A: Pursue the prevention of the significant deterioration of local and regional air quality.
CON -4.A.1: Support regional policies and efforts that improve air quality
Ongoing. The City worked with CDR and SCAG in development of the
to protect human and environmental health, and minimize disproportionate
2016-2040 RTP (Regional Transportation Plan) and SCS (Sustainable
impacts on sensitive population groups.
Communities Strategy) regional plans.
CON -4.A.2: Encourage businesses, industries and residents to reduce
the impact of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of stationary and
Ongoing.
non -stationary pollution sources.
CON -4.A.3: Require that sensitive uses such as schools, childcare
This is considered in review of private childcare and school
centers, parks and playgrounds, housing, and community gathering places
developments.
are protected from adverse impacts of emissions.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 43
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
CON -4.A.4: Continue to participate in regional planning efforts with the
Southern California Association of Governments, nearby jurisdictions, and
Ongoing.
the South Coast Air Quality Management District to meet or exceed air
quality standards.
CON -4.A.5: Encourage compact development, infill development, and a
Urban Plan project encourage compact infill developments. The City has
mix of uses that are in proximity to transit, pedestrian, and bicycling
approved more than 500 units that are infill development and in proximity
infrastructures.
to transit stops.
CON -4.A.6: Enhance bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support
public bus service, pursuant to the Circulation Element's goals, objectives,
Ongoing.
and policies.
CON -4.A.7: Encourage installation of renewable energy devices for
businesses and facilities and strive to reduce community -wide energy
Ongoing.
consumption.
CON -4.A.8: Develop long-term, community -wide strategies and programs
Ongoing. The City worked with CDR and SCAG in development of the
that work at the local level to reduce greenhouse gases and Costa Mesa's
2016-2040 RTP (Regional Transportation Plan) and SCS (Sustainable
"carbon footprint".
Communities Strategy) regional plans.
NOISE ELEMENT
Goal N-1: Noise Hazards and Conditions
Objective N-1 A: Control noise levels within the City for the protection of residential areas, park areas, and other sensitive land uses from excessive
and unhealthful noise.
N-1.1: Enforce the maximum acceptable exterior noise levels for
Ongoing.
residential areas at 65 CNEL.
N-1.2: Give full consideration to the existing and projected noise
environment when considering alterations to the City's circulation system
Ongoing.
and Master Plan of Highways.
N-1.3: Encourage Caltrans to construct noise attenuation barriers along
1-405, SR -55, and SR -73 where these freeways adjoin residential and
Ongoing.
other noise -sensitive areas.
N-1.4: Ensure that appropriate site design measures are incorporated
into residential developments, when required by an acoustical study, to
obtain appropriate exterior and interior noise levels.
Ongoing. Specific sound attenuation for interior and exterior spaces is
incorporated per requirements of the acoustical studies on project basis.
When necessary, require field testing at the time of project completion to
demonstrate compliance.
N-1.5: Apply the standards contained in Title 24 of the California Code of
Ongoing.
Regulations as applicable to the construction of all new dwelling units.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 44
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
N-1.6: Discourage sensitive land uses from locating within the 65 CNEL
noise contour of John Wayne Airport. Should it be deemed by the City as
appropriate and/or necessary for a sensitive land use to locate in the 65
Ongoing.
CNEL noise contour, ensure that appropriate interior noise levels are met
and that minimal outdoor activities are allowed.
N-1.7: Support alternative methods for the reduction of noise impacts at
John Wayne Airport while continuing to maintain safety and existing
Ongoing.
limitations on aircraft daily departures.
N-1.8: Monitor the noise levels at OC Fair and Event Center and the
Pacific Amphitheater, and continue to monitor the status of legally binding
Ongoing.
noise levels on the OC Fair and the Event Center and the Pacific
Amphitheater.
Goal N-2: Noise and Land Use Compatibility
Objective N -2A: Plan for the reduction in noise impacts on sensitive receptors
and land uses.
N-2.1: Require the use of sound walls, berms, interior noise insulation,
double -paned windows, and other noise mitigation measures, as
appropriate, in the design of new residential or other new noise sensitive
Ongoing and reviewed for residential projects.
land uses that are adjacent to arterials, freeways, or adjacent to industrial
or commercial uses.
N-2.2: Require, as a part of the environmental review process, that full
Ongoing for all new projects.
consideration be given to the existing and projected noise environment.
N-2.3: Consider alternative noise level standards for mixed-use projects
Ongoing for projects utilizing the City's Urban Plans (19 West Urban Plan,
that take into consideration the interaction of industrial operation noise
Mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan, Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban
impacts and the mixed-use developments planned for the Westside and
Plan and SoBeca Urban Plan).
SoBeca.
N-2.4: Require that all proposed projects are compatible with adopted
Ongoing for all new projects.
noise/land use compatibility criteria.
N-2.5: Enforce applicable interior and exterior noise standards.
Ongoing for all new projects.
N-2.6: Allow a higher exterior noise level standard for infill projects in
existing residential areas adjacent to major arterials if it can be shown that
there are no feasible mechanisms to meet the exterior noise levels. The
Ongoing.
interior standard of 45 dBA CNEL shall be enforced for any new residential
project.
N-2.7: Encourage effective site planning in mixed-use areas that
provides the optimal distance between source of excessive sound and
Ongoing.
residents.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 45
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
N-2.8: Require new mixed-use developments to site loading areas,
parking lots, driveways, trash enclosures, mechanical equipment, and
Ongoing for all new mixed-use developments.
other noise sources away from the residential portion of the development
and adjacent established residential development.
N-2.9: Limit hours and/or require attenuation of
commercial/entertainment operations adjacent to residential and other
Ongoing.
noise sensitive uses in order to minimize excessive noise to these
receptors.
SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal S-1: Risk Management of Natural and Human -Caused Disasters
Objective S-1 A: Work to mitigate and prevent potential adverse consequences of natural and human -caused disasters.
S-1.1: Continue to incorporate geotechnical hazard data into future land
Ongoing.
use decision-making, site design, and construction standards.
S-1.2: Enforce standards, review criteria, and ensure that structures on
or adjacent to bluffs are set back sufficiently to preserve the natural
Ongoing. Reviewed in detail for each project with the geotechnical report.
contours and aesthetic value of the bluff line and to provide sufficient
access for fire protection.
S-1.3: Require geologic surveys of all new development located on or
Ongoing. Reviewed in detail for each project with the geotechnical report.
adjacent to bluffs.
S-1.4: Encourage retrofitting of structures—particularly older buildings—
There have been no development incentives regarding seismic hazards in
to withstand earthquake shaking and landslides consistent with State and
2012.
historical building codes.
S-1.5: Enforce applicable building codes relating to the seismic design of
Ongoing.
structures to reduce the potential for loss of life and property damage.
S-1.6: Identify through a study the issue of unreinforced masonry
buildings and soft stories and other structures not meeting earthquake
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
standards in Costa Mesa. Provide assistance if necessary to unreinforced
annual review.
masonry building owners once those buildings have been identified.
S-1.7: Continue to implement the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act, which
requires sites within liquefaction hazard areas to be investigated for
No additional public information has been provided. Seismic standards
liquefaction susceptibility prior to building construction or human
are reviewed with building permit applications.
occupancy.
S-1.8: Consider site soils conditions when reviewing projects in areas
Ongoing per State guidelines.
subject to liquefaction or sloe instability.
S-1.9: Continue to consult with appropriate local, State, and federal
agencies to maintain the most current flood hazard and floodplain
With the latest improvements in the flood channels reflected in the 2009
information; use the information as a basis for project review and to guide
Flood maps, there are no residential properties within flood hazard areas.
development in accordance with federal, State, and local standards.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13' Edition) Page 46
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
S-1.10: Regularly review and update Article 10 - Floodway and Floodplain
Districts of the City's Municipal Code consistent with federal and State
Ongoing as information becomes available
requirements.
S-1.11: Improve and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure in a
Ongoing.
manner that reduces flood hazards.
S-1.12: Continue to develop hazard preparedness plans to prepare for
Ongoing.
large storms that could bring flooding hazards and other related issues.
S-1.13: Actively promote public education, research, and information
Ongoing.
dissemination on flooding hazards.
S-1.14: Minimize flood hazard risks to people, property, and the
Ongoing.
environment by addressing potential damage tsunamis and sea level rise.
S-1.15: Consult with regional agencies and study strategies that employ
engineering defensive methods along the Santa Ana River that limit
Ongoing.
potential flooding hazards from sea level rise.
S-1.16: Develop emergency response, early warning notification, and
This is a new General Plan policy that has been in effect for 6 months.
evacuation plans for areas that are within dam inundation areas, where
These policies would require further studies and coordination with other
feasible.
agencies. Additional information will be provided with the 2017 annual
update.
S-1.17: Utilize the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP)
as a planning resource for evaluation of land use compatibility and land
use intensity in areas affected by airport operations. In particular, future
Ongoing.
land use decisions within the Safety/Runway Protection Zone will be
evaluated in light of the risk to life and property associated with aircraft
operations.
S-1.18: Comply with Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) and the John
Wayne AELUP requirements relative to Objects Affecting Navigable
Ongoing.
Airspace.
S-1.19: Use the Federal Aviation Regulations as a guideline to establish
Ongoing.
the ultimate height of structures as defined in FAR Part 77.
S-1.20: Minimize hazards to aeronautical operations by ensuring land
uses do not emit excessive glare, light, steam, smoke, dust, or electronic
Ongoing.
interference in compliance with FAR regulations and the John Wayne
AELUP.
Goal S-2: High Level of Police and Fire Services and Emergency Preparedness
Objective S -2A: Plan, promote, and demonstrate a readiness to respond and reduce threats to life and property through traditional and
innovative emergency services and programs.
S-2.1: Promote crime prevention strategies and provide a high level of
Ongoing.
response to incidents.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13' Edition)
Page 47
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
S-2.2: Emphasize and prioritize crime prevention strategies, such as
Ongoing.
pedestrian -scale lighting in targeted areas.
S-2.3: Timely response to incidents and monitoring areas with high crime
rates should be part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce crime in the
Ongoing.
community.
S-2.4: Provide a high level of police and fire service in the community.
Ongoing.
Secure adequate facilities, equipment, and personnel for police and fire.
S-2.5: Consult with neighboring jurisdictions and partner agencies to
Ongoing.
respond appropriately to emergencies and incidents in all parts of the City.
S-2.6: Require that water supply systems for development are adequate
to combat structural fires in terms of location and minimum required fire-
Ongoing.
flow pressures.
S-2.7: Require development to contribute its fair share toward funding
the provision of appropriate fire and emergency medical services as
Ongoing.
determined necessary to adequately serve the project.
S-2.8: Regularly update regulations that will protect the community from
Ongoing.
fire hazards.
S-2.9: Emphasize prevention and awareness of fire safety guidelines to
minimize risk and potential damage to life, property, and the environment.
In areas designated by the Costa Mesa Fire Department as having a high
Ongoing.
fire hazard, ensure adequate fire equipment, personnel, firebreaks,
facilities, water, and access fora quick and efficient response in any area.
S-2.10: Maintain staff and facilities that will continue to support a
coordinated and effective response to emergencies and natural disasters
Ongoing.
throughout the City.
S-2.11: Consult with neighboring jurisdictions, local employers, and
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
industries to ensure that emergency preparedness and disaster response
annual review.
programs equitably serve all parts of the City.
S-2.12: Continue to maintain adequate police and fire staffing, facilities,
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
equipment, and maintenance sufficient to protect the community.
annual review.
S-2.13: Continue to consult with the County of Orange in the
implementation of the Orange County Hazardous Waste Management
Ongoing.
Plan.
S-2.14: Ensure that appropriate in-depth environmental analysis is
conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment,
Ongoing with all related projects.
transfer, and/or disposal facility.
S-2.15: Continue to consult with the County of Orange to identify and
inventory all users of hazardous materials and all hazardous waste
Ongoing.
generators, and prepare clean-up action plans for identified disposal sites.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1311 Edition) Page 48
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
S-2.16: Require the safe production, transportation, handling, use, and
disposal of hazardous materials that may cause air, water, or soil
Ongoing.
contamination.
S-2.17: Encourage best practices in hazardous waste management, and
ensure consistency with City, County, and federal guidelines, standards,
Ongoing.
and requirements.
S-2.18: Consult with federal, State, and local agencies and law
enforcement to prevent the illegal transportation and disposal of
Ongoing.
hazardous waste.
COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
Goal CD -1: Vehicular and Pedestrian Corridors
Objective CD -1 A: Contribute to City beautification by enhancing the visual environment of Costa Mesa's vehicular and pedestrian paths and
corridors.
CD -1.1 Implement the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median
New and consistent landscape palette is required for all new
Development Guidelines in all new streetscape corridor and parkway
developments along Harbor Blvd. south of the 405 Freeway.
projects. Coordinate with new development adjacent to public rights -of-
Multiple City street rehabilitation projects have been completed, including
ways to integrate landscape features and design elements consistent with
the Harbor Boulevard beautification project and the Harbor
the streetscape standards and recommendations.
Boulevard/Adams Avenue intersection improvements.
CD -1.2 Coordinate street furniture elements (benches, bus shelters,
newspaper racks, trash receptacles, kiosks, etc.) whenever possible.
Develop design standards and guidelines for the street furniture within and
Ongoing.
adjacent to public rights-of-way to complement the specific
recommendations provided for streets in the City of Costa Mesa
Streetsca a and Median Development Guidelines.
CD -1.3 Promote treatments for walls and fences and utility cabinets along
public rights-of-way that contribute to an attractive street and sidewalk
environment. Require that new walls and fences complement the style and
All new residential development projects are subject to a standard
character of the local district and adjacent buildings. Newly constructed or
condition that requires decorative walls along the perimeter of the
reconstructed walls and fences adjacent to sidewalks and roadways
development.
should incorporate architectural treatments such as pilasters, masonry, or
wrought iron, and should integrate tiered plantings to soften their
appearance.
CD -1.4 Promote a consistent landscape character along City streets to
reinforce the unique qualities of each corridor and district, including the
This condition is required for all new commercial development along
development of landscaped medians. Support implementation of the
Harbor Blvd. The city tree palette is implemented with all new projects.
recommended street tree palette for each City street, as identified in the
City of Costa Mesa Streetsca a and Median Development Guidelines.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13m Edition) Page 49
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
CD -1.5 Encourage electric and communication lines to be placed
underground and electrical substations and telephone facilities to be
All new development is required to underground all utilities to the greatest
screened to minimize visual impacts from sidewalks, streets, and adjacent
extent possible. No assessment district has been formed.
properties. Support utility undergrounding through conditions of project
approval, preparation of undergrounding plans, and the formation of
assessment districts.
Objective CD -1 B: Encourage clear connections between districts within the
City.
CD -1.6 Promote linkages between separate districts using bike trails,
pedestrian paths, common medians or parkway landscaping, and other
location -appropriate physical improvements. Through conditions of
Ongoing.
approval, public improvement projects, and other measures, support
development of new connections and the enhancement of existing
connections between districts.
Goal CD -2: Cohesive and Identifiable Districts
Objective CD -2A: Encourage future development and redevelopment to reinforce district scale, identity, and urban form.
CD -2.1 Consider urban design guidelines for each identified district in
Costa Mesa that recognizes, maintains, and enhances the character and
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
identity of each district; integrate existing specific plans' policies and
annual review.
design guidelines as applicable.
CD -2.2 Support and seek land uses and development that correspond or
Ongoing.
enrich our existing districts.
Goal CD -3: High Quality and Visually Interesting Nodes
Objective CD -3A: Create a sense of arrival to Costa Mesa, and develop
prominent community focal points at key nodes within the City.
CD -3.1 Introduce entry monument signs at key gateway locations, as
Ongoing. Project and neighborhood identification signs have been
identified in Figure CD -4. Utilize the standard design specifications for
installed at Superior Pointe, Level 1, Eastside (Del Mar), and College
entry signs included in the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median
Park.
Development Guidelines.
CD -3.2 Reinforce a sense of arrival into the City by promoting
architecturally significant development and significant landscape plantings
New and consistent landscape palette was required for all new
at key nodes. Undertake a visioning process to develop specific design
development along Harbor Boulevard and major corridors.
guidelines that articulate the desired character for each node within Costa
Mesa.
CD -3.3 Design and development of entry and internal wayfinding signage
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
to be located throughout the City in areas that correspond to the existing
annual review.
nodes and districts.
Goal CD -4: Identifiable and Protected City Landmarks.
Objective CD -4A: Promote the maintenance, use, and improvement of landmarks to enhance the visual image and identity of Costa Mesa.
CD -4.1 Support efforts to introduce new monuments and landmarks, and
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2018
reserve, maintain, and improve the condition of Costa Mesa landmarks.
annual review.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 50
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Goal CD -5: Edges
Objective CD -5A: Develop and implement programs that preserve and enhance City edges.
CD -5.1 Preserve and optimize natural views and open spaces in Costa
Ongoing.
Mesa.
CD -5.2 Control the visual impacts of new development on natural views of
Ongoing for all new projects.
the coast and the wetlands.
CD -5.3 Develop open space corridors and trails along the edges of Costa
Mesa where feasible and connect these trails to existing and potential
Ongoing.
future trails throughout the City.
CD -5.4 Continue to preserve natural open space, including restoration of
Ongoing.
the natural areas of Talbert Regional Park.
CD -5.5 Continue protection of Fairview Park as an open space and
Ongoing.
recreation area.
CD -5.6 Continue to work with Caltrans to improve the design quality of
Ongoing.
freeway edges.
Goal CD -6: Image
Objective CD -6A: Establish development policies and design guidelines that create an aesthetically pleasing and functional environment.
CD -6.1 Encourage the inclusion of public art and attractive, functional
architecture into new development that will have the effect of promoting
Ongoing.
Costa Mesa as the "City of the Arts".
CD -6.2 Encourage the use of creative and well-designed signs that
Ongoing.
establish a distinctive image for the City.
CD -6.3 Continue to work with Code Enforcement to ensure continued
maintenance of properties and compliance with adopted development
Ongoing.
standards.
Goal CD -7: Quality Residential
Objective CD -7A: Encourage excellence in architectural design.
CD -7.1 Ensure that new and remodeled structures are designed in
architectural styles that reflect the City's eclectic quality, yet are
compatible in scale and character with existing buildings and the natural
Ongoing.
surroundings within residential neighborhoods. Continue to update and
maintain the Costa Mesa Residential Guidelines.
CD -7.2 Preserve the character and scale of Costa Mesa's established
residential neighborhoods where possible; when new residential
development is proposed, encourage that the new structures are
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects.
consistent with the prevailing character of existing development in the
immediate vicinity, and that new development does not have a substantial
adverse impact on adjacent areas.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1311 Edition)
Page 51
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Objective CD -7113: Encourage the use of native plant palettes in the creation of landscaping plans used to establish a sense of place in neighborhood
identification efforts.
CD -7.3 Ensure that California native plants are used to support the local
Ongoing. In January 2016, the Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines
ecology and save water. Develop landscaping guidelines that reflect the
were revised to reflect Governor Brown's April 1, 2015 Drought Executive
local community.
Order B-19-25 .
Goal CD -8: Quality Commercial Development
Objective CD -8A: Encourage a high level of architectural and site design quality.
CD -8.1 Require that new and remodeled commercial development be
designed to reflect architectural diversity, yet be compatible with the scale
Ongoing.
and character of the district.
CD -8.2 Use distinctive commercial architectural styles to reinforce a
positive sense of place. Commercial architectural design elements and
materials must be of high quality and style as well as suitable for long-term
maintenance. Consistent architectural design should be considered in
choosing materials, finishes, decorative details, color, accent features and
include the following elements and materials appropriate for their context
(see Table CD -3: Elements and Materials):
Table CD -3: Elements and Materials
Design Design
Simple, multi -planed pitched roofs Stucco, smooth, sand or light lace
Open rafters/tails with large overhangs finish
Ongoing for all new commercial projects.
Appearance of "thick" walls Wood, as an exposed structural
Courtyards, arcades, and intimate material
spaces Clay or concrete roof tiles
Tile details Native fieldstone
Deep-set window and door openings Wood window casements
Offset wall planes Wood, as an accent material
Fountains and other unique details Brick, as an accent material
Building masses with the incorporation Wrought iron (rust proof; anodized
of one and two story architecture aluminum)
Sequencing of enclosed space/arches Tile, as an accent material
Slumpstone garden walls
CD -8.3 Encourage the use of entrance patios, courtyards, plazas,
arcades, fountains, porches, tower elements, covered walks, and other
Ongoing for all new and rehabilitation projects.
features in commercial areas. Promote pedestrian amenities.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 52
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
CD -8.4 Ensure that common areas, walkways, driveways, and parking
spaces be landscaped consistent with landscaping standards contained in
the Planning, Zoning, and Development Code. Utilize landscaping to
provide project amenities for new and remodeled commercial uses, and to
Ongoing for all new and rehabilitation projects.
screen parking and equipment areas. Landscaped areas generally should
incorporate planting utilizing a three -tiered system: 1) grasses and ground
covers, 2 shrubs and vines, and 3 trees.
CD -8.5 Ensure that site access, parking, and circulation for commercial
uses are designed in a logical, safe manner. Parking should not dominate
the site in areas adjacent to street, and should be well landscaped with a
clear hierarchy of circulation. Wherever possible, parking lots should be
Ongoing for all new and rehabilitation projects.
divided into a series of connected smaller lots utilizing walkways and
raised landscape strips. Parking lots should also include landscaping that
accents the importance of driveways from the street, frames the major
circulation aisles, and highlights pedestrian pathways.
CD -8.6 Require that areas for outside equipment, trash receptacles,
storage, and loading areas be located in the least conspicuous part of the
site. Utility and mechanical equipment (e.g. electric and gas meters,
electrical panels, and junction boxes) should be concealed from view from
Ongoing and required for all new and rehabilitation projects.
public streets, neighboring properties, and nearby higher buildings. Trash
enclosures should be architecturally compatible with the project.
Landscaping should be incorporated into the design of trash enclosures to
deter graffiti.
CD -8.7 Encourage decorative paving treatments to be incorporated
throughout commercial developments, including driveway entries,
pedestrian walkways, plazas, and other areas. The design, materials, and
colors of decorative paving treatments (e.g., stamped concrete, stone,
Ongoing for all new commercial projects.
brick or granite pavers, exposed aggregate, or colored concrete) should
complement the architectural style of the primary buildings and make a
positive contribution to the aesthetic and function of the site.
CD -8.8 Require that exterior lighting on commercial properties be
consistent with the architectural style of the commercial building. On each
commercial site, all lighting fixtures should be from the same family of
fixtures with respect to design, materials, color, fixture, and color of light.
Lighting sources should be shielded, diffused or indirect to avoid spillover
Ongoing for all commercial projects.
on adjacent properties, nighttime sky light pollution, and glare to
pedestrians and motorists. To minimize the total number of freestanding
light standards, wall -mounted and pathway lights should be utilized to the
greatest extent possible.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 53
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Objective CD -8113: Preserve the scale and character of established neighborhoods near commercial uses.
CD -8.9 Ensure that new commercial development utilize site planning and
design features that optimize compatibility with adjacent residential
neighborhoods. The following guidance should be considered:
When adjacent residential and nonresidential uses can mutually benefit
from connection, appropriate linkages (e.g., walkways, common landscape
areas, and building orientation) are encouraged. Successful interaction
between commercial and residential uses may be achieved through
adequate setbacks, landscape buffers, screening, decorative masonry
Ongoing for all new commercial projects.
walls, berms, building orientation, and limitations of commercial activities.
Loading areas, access and circulation driveways, trash and storage areas,
and rooftop equipment should be located as far as possible from adjacent
residences.
Building orientation and landscaping of commercial buildings should
minimize direct lines of sight into adjacent residential private open sace.
Goal CD -9: Mixed Use
Objective CD -9A: Design mixed use development projects to achieve a hi h quality character.
CD -9.1 Require that mixed-use development projects be designed to
mitigate potential conflicts between uses. Consider noise, lighting, and
Ongoing for all mixed-use development projects.
security.
CD -9.2 Provide adequate parking, open space and recreational facilities
to serve residents in mixed-use development projects. Design parking and
Ongoing.
other areas to acknowledge different users (residents versus shoppers)
and to be compatible with the architectural character of the building(s).
Objective CD -9113: Provide for the development of projects that integrate ousing with commercial uses and other compatible uses.
CD -9.3 Encourage mixed-use development along the east side of
Newport Boulevard between Mesa Drive and Walnut Street. Establish
Ongoing.
incentives for the development of projects in planned development zones
that integrate housing with retail and office uses.
CD -9.4 Encourage the development of mixed-use urban villages along
specified areas of West 17th Street, West 19th Street, and Superior
On-going. 19 West Urban Plan, Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban
Avenue that integrates residential with office, retail, business services,
Plan, Mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan allow for mixed use development
personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community
along the main commercial corridors.
amenities in a single building (vertical mixed-use development) or in
proximity on the same site horizontal mixed-use development).
CD -9.5 Promote new types of urban housing that could be target -
marketed to people seeking alternative housing choices in proximity to a
Ongoing.
major commercial area.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 54
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
CD -9.6 Support efforts to mix compatible uses and activities. Encourage
Ongoing. An example is the assisted living project at 1640 Monrovia
the siting of community -oriented services, businesses, and amenities in
which combines 111 unit independent and assisted living facility in a 4 -
and near mixed-use neighborhoods, including schools, libraries, open
story building to include amenities such as, fitness center, dance studio,
space, and parks.
cafe, bar/lounge, a small events ace and ancillary offices ace.
Goal: CD -10: Industrial and Business Parks
OWective CD -10A: Require that industrial and business park projects meet high-quality design standards.
CD -10.1 Require that industrial projects be designed to convey
visual interest and a positive image. Architectural qualities and design
elements encouraged for industrial uses are:
Building modulation indentations and architectural details
• Building entry accentuation
Ongoing for all new industrial projects.
• Screening of equipment and storage areas
• Landscaping to soften building exteriors and to serve as a buffer
between uses
CD -10.2 Encourage that the design of industrial buildings considers
the visual and physical relationship to adjacent uses. An industrial
Ongoing and reviewed for all industrial projects.
structure which dominates its surrounding environment by its relative size
shall generally be discouraged.
CD -10.3 Encourage adaptive reuse of existing industrial structures
which results in rehabilitated buildings with distinctive and attractive
Ongoing.
architecture.
CD -10.4 Promote the use of materials and colors that produce
diversity and visual interest in industrial buildings. The use of various
Ongoing for all new industrial projects.
siding materials (i.e., masonry, concrete texturing, cement, or plaster) can
produce effects of texture and relief that provide architectural interest.
CD -10.5 Require that landscaping be used to define areas such as
entrances to industrial buildings and parking lots; define the edges of
developments; provide transition between neighboring properties; and
Ongoing and required for all industrial projects.
provide screening for outdoor storage, loading, and equipment areas.
Landscaping should be in scale with adjacent buildings and be of an
appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended purpose.
CD -10.6 Require that the design of lighting fixtures and their
Ongoing and required for all industrial projects. Standard conditions of
structural support be of a scale and architectural design compatible with
approval for industrial projects ensure minimal visual impacts and minimal
on-site industrial buildings. Large areas should be illuminated to minimize
light spillover onto surrounding properties.
the visual impact and amount of spillover light onto surrounding projects.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 55
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
Objective CD -1013: Ensure that the development of industrial projects are positive additions to the City's community setting and do not result in
adverse impacts with adjacent uses.
CD -10.7 Require industrial projects to incorporate landscape
setbacks, screening walls, and/or other elements that mitigate negative
Ongoing and required for all industrial projects.
impacts with adjacent uses.
CD -10.8 Protect transitional areas between industrial and other
Ongoing.
uses.
CD -10.9 Storage yards, parking areas, and service areas should
Ongoing and required for these uses.
be screened from public view.
Goal CD -11: Attractive Signs that Reflect Costa Mesa
Objective CD -11A: Facilitate the installation of signs that contribute to a positive image of the public realm.
CD -11.1 Encourage homeowners' associations and neighborhoods
to maintain housing tract entrance signs in an attractive condition, and
Ongoing.
encourage the placement of such signs at the entrance of major
developments which do not have such identification.
CD -11.2 Encourage the use of common design elements in signs
for commercial and industrial centers through the development of planned
Ongoing.
sign programs to improve center identity by publicizing the benefits of such
programs to developers and local business operators.
CD -11.3 Encourage citywide sign design guidelines that promote
creativity and flexibility while upholding design quality. Design guidelines
Ongoing.
could include the design and placement of business signs, public street
graphics, street signs, locational and directional signs, traffic signs, etc.
CD -11.4 Introduce distinctive entry signage within the Costa Mesa
Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines which effectively
Ongoing.
announces arrival to unique districts and neighborhoods.
CD -11.5 Develop and design signage that helps with way -finding
throughout the City so visitors and residents can easily access destination
Ongoing.
locations and identify landmarks.
Goal CD -12: Public Safety through Design
Objective CD -12A: Incorporate public safety considerations into community design.
CD -12.1 Decrease the opportunity for criminal activity by
addressing high-risk circumstances (e.g., dark alleys, enclosed stairwells,
Ongoing and reviewed for all new projects.
and dark entrances). Involve the Police and Fire Departments in reviewing
and making design recommendations during the project review process.
CD -12.2 Continue to implement and refine development standards
and/or guidelines based on Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Ongoing.
Design (CPTED) for new development and redevelopment with emphasis
on site and building design to minimize vulnerability to criminal activity.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1311 Edition)
Page 56
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
CD -12.3 Continue to provide CPTED training to City staff and local
planning and design professionals to optimize public safety through
Ongoing.
community design.
OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ELEMENT
Goal OSR-1: Balanced and Accessible System of Parks and Open Spaces
Objective OSR-1 A: Maintain and preserve existing parks, and strive to provide additional parks, public spaces, and recreation facilities that meet the
community's evolving needs.
OSR-1.1: Maintain a system of Neighborhood and Community Parks that
Regular park programs and maintenance take place throughout the City's
provide a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities
park spaces.
throughout the City.
OSR-1.2: Provide parks and recreation facilities appropriate for the
Recreational facility building are located in the Mesa Verde corridor
individual neighborhoods in which they are located and reflective of the
(BCC), in the Downtown corridor (DRC/NCC/DAC) and in the West
needs and interests of the population they serve.
corridor CMSC . Parks are scattered throughout the Clt
OSR-1.3: Pursue the acquisition and development of pocket and
neighborhood parks within park -deficient areas, as identified in Figure
Ongoing.
OSR-3: Planning Areas and Underserved Park Areas.
OSR-1.4: Prioritize the acquisition of land for parks in underserved
The Update to the Open Space Master Plan of Parks & Recreation may
neighborhoods.
highlight areas of the City that are most "park -poor"
OSR-1.5: Maximize public space by requiring plazas and public gathering
spaces in private developments that can serve multiple uses, including
Ongoing
recreation and social needs.
OSR-1.6: Provide maximum visibility and accessibility for future public
Ongoing as new projects are reviewed
arks by locating facilities in close proximity to public streets.
OSR-1.7: Adjust and update development fee programs to accumulate
New Measure Z fees may add additional funding depending on
funds for the acquisition and improvement of parks and recreation facilities
implementation plan.
commensurate with identified need and population growth.
OSR-1.8: Require that parks and recreation facilities reflect new trends
and population changes, and are developed with facilities appropriate to
Ongoing. Open Space Master Plan of Parks and Recreation
all ages, including athletic fields, active play areas, passive open space,
tot lots, and picnic areas.
OSR-1.9: Conduct a sports facility study to review current outdoor facility
The update to the Open Space Master Plan of Recreation is in process
locations and resources and a demographic study for future facility
and addresses this.
requirements as they relate to planned growth within the City.
OSR-1.10: Pursue additional community garden lots and spaces to meet
The update to the Open Space Master Plan of Recreation is in process
demand and need by the community.
and may address this.
OSR-1.11: Perform regular maintenance of facilities to ensure proper
Facility Maintenance staff are stationed at specific recreational facility
working order of all recreation facilities and equipment.
locations to meet the daily demand of upkeep of upkeep for equipment
and building interior/exterior.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13t1 Edition)
Page 57
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
OSR-1.12: Retrofit parks and recreation facilities to provide disability
CMSC added outdoor fitness equipment that is accessible by wheelchair
access as required by law.
patrons. Benches have been placed at the Bark Park in accessible areas.
Replacement of rotted, wood park shelters are now in the form of high
OSR-1.13: Design and reform parks to reflect the latest recreational
standard aluminum product less susceptible to the elements.
features that respond to demographic changes and community needs.
Considerations are being made for specialized/themed play structure
replacement, depending on neighborhood and available funding. Outdoor
fitness equipment is being considered.
OSR-1.14: Consult with law enforcement agencies, surrounding cities,
Coordinate with CMPD and OC Parks for any large events held in
community policing groups, and OC Parks to create a safe and healthy
Fairview Park/Talbert Park/River Trail area. Coordinate with CMPD Park
environment at Talbert Regional Park, Fairview Park, and along the Santa
Rangers and Lt. regularly to discuss issues and track monthly reports for
Ana River.
Fairview Park.
OSR-1.15: Continue to pursue opportunities to create joint -use
community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as
Held discussions with local church group pertaining to potential for facility
private schools, faith -based groups, service clubs, and hospitals.
use if needed.
OSR-1.16: Continue to coordinate with the Newport -Mesa Unified School
Joint -use agreement is still actively used in in active 5 -year term. Staff
District to supplement City park facilities through joint -use agreements.
meet regularly with NMUSD representatives to communicate items
joint
ertainin to use.
OSR-1.17: Consult with Orange County Fairgrounds in implementing OC
Ongoing.
Fair & Event Center Master Plan.
OSR-1.18: Provide a minimum of 4.26 acres of parkland per 1,000
Currently providing 3.66 acres. Recommendations to raise the number
may come from the Update to the Open Space Master Plan of Parks &
residents.
Recreation.
OSR-1.19: Update the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
In the final stages of updating by the consultant RJM Design Group.
every 10 years, as feasible.
Document is in review by the Parks & Recreation Commission before it
will be heard by the City Council.
OSR-1.20: Enhance pedestrian, bicycle, and transit linkages to meet the
needs of residents and to provide better access to parks, recreation, and
Ongoing.
public spaces.
OSR-1.21: Provide opportunities for public access to all open space
areas, except where sensitive resources may be threatened or damaged,
Ongoing.
public health and safety may be compromised, or access would interfere
with the managed production of resources.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 58
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
GOAL OSR-2: Community Services Programs Meeting Community Needs
Objective OSR-2A: Provide activities, classes, and a variety of programs to meet the year-round recreational needs of all residents: children, adult,
seniors, and persons with special needs.
Approximately 250 recreational classes, programs and events are
OSR-2.1: Provide high-quality community services programs that are
available to all -age participants that include multi -generational offerings,
flexible and responsive to the community's changing needs.
enrichment programs, physical and social activities, arts and culture
programs as well as partnership offerings that offer inclusive recreational
0 ortunities.
OSR-2.2: Plan and conduct citywide special events that bring residents
Annual calendar of community events includes events including: Concerts
together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic
in the Park, Movies in the Park, Scarecrow Festival Costa Mesa
development.
Community Run, Fish Fry, Action Arts in the Park, Artventure
OSR-2.3: Continue to consult with nonprofit sports organizations and
Work with approximately 16 sports league organizations to meet the
recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational
needs of field space provided the City and the NMUSD. Administered by
programs that complement and supplement those offered by the City.
staff with policies stated in the FUAP.
Costa Mesa Senior Center underwent extensive renovation in late 2014
and continues to receive upgrades as necessary to interior/exterior of
OSR-2.4: Update existing facilities for senior citizens, youth, adults, and
facility. Aquatic Center mechanical equipment and complete decking
overall community use.
updated in late 2016. BCC flooring replaced in 2016. NCC closure in late
2016 to make way for the Lions Park Projects. Multiple park upgrades to
ark shelters and play structures took place in 2016.
OSR-2.5: Monitor and research the ever-changing community services
Surveys are conducted to gain data regarding resident feedback ofn
needs of the community, and develop action plans to address those needs
programs and quality of service.
through partnerships with service agencies.
OSR-2.6: Continue to provide rental opportunities at community facilities
and parks for residents, nonprofit groups, and businesses to meet their
Ongoing.
recreational and professional needs.
OSR-2.7: Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform
Publication of quarterly recreation guide magazine, Senior Center
residents of all available community services programs, and obtain input
Chronicle newsletter, Social Media Campaigns, Program and Event
from the community regarding ro ram and service needs.
FI ers, News a er and magazine articles, etc.
OSR-2.8: Encourage resident input and utilize demographic data,
Surveys are conducted to gain data regarding resident feedback on
partnerships, volunteers, and existing resources to identify the needs of
programs and quality of service.
community.
OSR-2.9: Identify innovative funding and development opportunities to
Attained grant funding from NRPA and awarded designation as a 'Playful
support and sustain a responsive community services network.
City USA' due to commitment to making parks and spaces available to
encourage participants to get outside.
OSR-2.10: Continue and expand the development of community
partnerships to offer both standard and innovative services to meet
Gained new partnerships with Medical, Sport and Arts Community.
residents' needs.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 59
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
OSR-2.11: Develop and implement community services programs and
Mobile Recreation Program reimplementation to reach the underserved
activities that meet the needs of specialized populations through the
parks and programs population.
development of community partnerships.
OSR-2.12: Provide support for volunteer groups that conduct special
Assist with Egg-Citement Event, Costa Mesa Community Run, Snow Day
activities open to the entire community.
Event, Mica C3 Tournament.
GOAL OSR-3: Conserved Open Space
Objective OSR-3A: Preserve the City's opens ace lands and provide additional community and neighborhood parkland in underserved areas.
OSR-3.1: Preserve open space areas along The Santa Ana River, large
open space parks, and along the mesa formations to protect natural
Ongoing.
habitat and to maintain the integrity of the natural environment.
OSR-3.2: Encourage the preservation of coastal views from City and
Ongoing.
County parkland and public streets within Costa Mesa.
OSR-3.3: Identify current open space areas for protection, management,
and potential enhancement to maintain and, if possible, increase its value
Ongoing.
as wildlife habitat.
OSR-3.4: Encourage the long-term maintenance and management of
open space lands through open space easements, development rights
Ongoing.
transfers or acquisition, zoning regulations, and other incentives.
OSR-3.5: Encourage the greening and beautifying of the Santa Ana
Ongoing.
River.
OSR-3.6: Encourage opportunities for recreation, history, education,
interpretive materials, and art associated with the Santa Ana River open
Ongoing.
spaces.
OSR-3.7: Promote water quality strategies to improve water quality along
Ongoing.
the Santa Ana River.
OSR-3.8: Consult with State and regional agencies and the California
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), regarding open space
Ongoing.
planning efforts.
OSR-3.9: Consult with the Orange Coast River Park, Inc. and
surrounding cities and other government agencies in maintaining and
Ongoing. Staff met with OCRP in 2016 to discuss the options.
rehabilitating open space lands along the Santa Ana River.
OSR-3.10: Consult with OC Parks over the enhancements and
management of Talbert Regional Park without adversely impacting
Ongoing.
surrounding residential neighborhoods.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1311 Edition) Page 60
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
GOAL OSR-4: Extensive Arts and Culture Programs and Services
Objective OSR-4A: Support performing and visual arts programs, facilities, and activities that stimulate the minds and intellectual thinking of
community members to increase awareness of the City's motto, "The City of the Arts."
Participated in three large scale community events in conjunction with
OSR-4.1: Continue to support the mission of the Segerstrom Center for SCFTA. Meet with SCFTA Vice President of Community Engagement on
the Arts and associate venues and facilities. a regular basis and include programs in advertisement when appropriate.
Participate in NMUSD Arts Commission at South Coast Repertoire bi-
annually.
OSR-4.2: Support the development and operations of an arts museum at
the Seqerstrom Center for the Arts.
Ongoing.
OSR-4.3: Encourage additional indoor and outdoor facility spaces Utilize TeWinkle Park to hold annual Action Arts in the Park event. Create
citywide to display public art and host arts and culture special events. Art Galleries: City Hall Youth Art gallery, Art on the 5th gallery, The
Gallery at the Senior Center and mural display at the Teen Center.
OSR-4.4: Expand the City's role as a supporter of the arts. Host annual ARTventure event and welcome artists and performers from
Southern California to participate. 3K attendance.
OSR-4.5: Encourage financial support of the arts by supporting non-profit
groups and foundations.
OSR-4.6: Consider preparation of an arts and culture master plan for the
OSR-4.7: Consult with local agencies and surrounding cities to address
the creation and implementation of arts -friendly policies.
OSR-4.8: Enhance Costa Mesa's position as a leader in the arts in
Southern California and its recognition nationally as a city devoted to arts
institutions of superior quality.
OSR-4.9: Engage community members in arts activities, and utilize the
arts to provide educational and cultural awareness opportunities.
OSR-4.10: Continue the City's commitment to its arts in cooperation with
the private sector.
OSR-4.11: Provide opportunities for local artists to create and display
their work.
OSR-4.12: Support arts activities, programs, events, and facilities for
patrons to enjoy and share experiences, and that enhance the City's
economic vitality.
OSR-4.13: Designate Community Services Department staff with the
responsibility for expanding and implementing activities related to
recreational arts programming.
OSR-4.14: Pursue cooperative educational cultural programs enlisting
the aid of public and private institutions.
Ongoing.
Currently in the RFP Process.
May be addressed in the arts & culture master plan document. Reviewed
City of Newport Beach and City of Mission Viejo policies and master plan
documents.
Cultural Arts Committee hosts ARTventure event and Action Arts in the
Park events; gaining attendance from all over Southern California area.
Increase relationship with SCFTA to increase exposure.
Multiple arts and culture recreational classes and events are offered on a
monthly basis. Free art events are offered bi-annually.
Work with local art galleries to attain artist information and include private
artist art for public use (utility boxes, murals, art galleries).
Utility box art program, Public murals, t -shirt logo's, public facility art
galleries, bi-annual art events.
Lend staff support to the SCFTA for events, promote NMUSD art events,
and local college/university art events and facilities. Promote art
businesses that sponsor the arts in the City of Costa Mesa.
Falls under the role of Recreation Supervisor staff.
Historical Preservation Committee researching the display of borrowed
artifacts from Southern California museums and educational institutions.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition) Page 61
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
OSR-4.15: Continue to review adopting an Arts in Public Places
Utility Box Art Project, Public Mural Program, Logo design contest.
Program.
OSR-4.16: Pursue the placement of public art in prominent locations,
particularly along major travel corridors to enliven and beautify the public
Utility Box Art Project, Public Mural Program.
realm.
OSR-4.17: Develop incentives or programs that encourage art in new
To be implemented.
developments.
HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
Goal HCR -1: Historical, Archeological, and Paleontological Resource Preservation
Objective HCRAA: Encourage preservation and protection of the City's archaeolo ical, paleontological, and historical resources.
HCR -1.1: Encourage protection and enhancement of the diverse range
of historical sites and resources in the City for the benefit of current and
Ongoing.
future residents and visitors.
In 2011 a Historic Reserve account was created related to preservation of
HCR -1.2: Encourage the preservation of significant historical resources
Home Ranch historic structures and as a requirement of the Development
Agreement. The Historic Reserve Account is intended to be utilized for
(as identified in Table HCR -1) by developing and implementing incentives
purposes of providing financial support for the costs of maintaining,
such as building and planning application permit fee waivers, Mills Act
operating, and preserving the Historic Structures and Site.
contracts, grants and loans, and implementing other incentives identified
Per requirements of Home Ranch Development Agreement, the
in the Historical Preservation Ordinance.
developer has been hosting open house events at the Home Ranch site
on annual basis.
HCR -1.3: Promote context -sensitive design that respects and
celebrates the history and historical character of sites and resources while
Ongoing.
meeting contemporary needs of the community.
HCR -1.4: Require, as part of the environmental review procedure, an
evaluation of the significance of paleontological, archaeological, and
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
historical resources, and the impact of proposed development on those
extensive grading.
resources.
HCR -1.5: Continue to identify local landmarks with markers and way -
finding signage. Include informational signage about local history, utilizing
Ongoing.
maps to highlight locations of other historical resources at popular
historical sites.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (13" Edition)
Page 62
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy
Description of City Action
The Fairview Park Master Plan was last updated in November 2008. The
HCR -1.6: Encourage development of an interpretive center for
Master Plan includes an area south of the rail station, east of Placentia
paleontological, archaeological, and historical resources at Fairview Park.
Avenue, which is being retained for a potential museum site. The site
The center may contain resources found in the park area as well as
could house the Costa Mesa Historical Society, including archaeological
resources found throughout the City.
and historical resources at the Fairview Park site. Staff continues to
search for funding sources for the implementation of elements of the
Fairview Park Master Plan, including the potential museum site.
HCR -1.7: Require cultural resources studies (i.e, archaeological and
historical investigations) for all applicable discretionary projects, in
accordance with CEQA regulations. The studies should identify cultural
resources (i.e., prehistorical sites, historical sites, and isolated artifacts
and features) in the project area, determine their eligibility for inclusion in
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
the California Register of Historical Resources, and provide mitigation
extensive grading.
measures for any resources in the project area that cannot be avoided.
Cultural resources studies shall be completed by a professional
archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional
Qualifications Standards in prehistorical or historical archaeology.
HCR -1.8: Comply with requirements of the California Environmental
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
Quality Act regarding protection and recovery of archaeological resources
extensive grading.
discovered during development activities.
HCR -1.9: Require paleontological studies for all applicable discretionary
projects. The studies should identify paleontological resources in the
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
project area, and provide mitigation measures for any resources in the
extensive grading.
project area that cannot be avoided.
HCR -1.10: Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
regarding the protection and recovery of paleontological resources during
extensive grading.
development activities.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1" Edition)
Costa Mesa
Table Al — Annual Building Activity Report
Page 63
Table A2 — Annual Building Activity
Above Moderate -Income Units
Single
Housing
5+ Units
Housing with
Mobile
Total
without
Units
Financial
Financial
Housing Development Information
Assist. and/or
No. of Units Permitted
52
Assist. or
1
Deed
Deed
for Above Moderate
Restrictions
Restriction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Affordability by Household Incomes
Project
Unit
Tenure
Very -Low
Low Moderate Above
Total
Assist.
Deed
Category
R=Renter
Moderate
Units
Restrict
O=Owner
ions
Attached
O
50
0
SFD
O
1
53
0
Multi-
O
12
0
Family
Subtotal
115
0
(9) Total of Above Moderate from Table A2 > > >
0
(10) Total by income units
0
0
0
0
0
(Field 5) Table A
Table A2 — Annual Building Activity
Above Moderate -Income Units
Single
2-4
5+ Units
Second
Mobile
Total
Family
Units
Unit
Homes
No. of Units Permitted
52
62
1
115
for Above Moderate
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (111 Edition)
Costa Mesa
Table B - Regional Housing Needs
Allocation Progress
Page 64
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1s` Edition) Page 65
iceI
Costa Mesa
Table B — Regional Housing Needs
Allocation Progress
Enter Calendar Year starting with the first
year of the RHNA allocation period. See
2013
2014'
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Example.
Total Units
Total
RHNA
to Date
Remaining
Allocation
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
Year
(all years)
RHNA
by Income Level
Income Level
by
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Income
Level
Deed
Restricted
VeryLow
1
1
Non -deed
restricted
Deed
Restricted
1
Low
Non -deed
1
restricted
Deed
Restricted
Moderate
0
0
Non -deed
restricted
Above Moderate
0
22
50
93
115
280
0
Total RHNA by COG.
2
Enter allocation number:
280
Total Units ► ► ►
22
50
93
115
2
Remaining Need for RHNA Period ► ► ► ► ►
*New RHNA cycle began in 2014.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1't Edition)
Costa Mesa
Table C - Housing Program Status
Page 66
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (11t Edition) Page 67
Costa Mesal
City of Costa Mesa
Table C1 - Housing Program Status
(January 2016 - December 2016) (HCD)
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Ongoing through the Planning Division, in order to protect
residential uses from incompatibility.
PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT
Ongoing through various divisions and departments.
HOUSING REHABILITATION
Ongoing assistance through the Housing and Community
Development Division for owner -occupied units. Also the
Housing and Community Development Division provides
assistance with the purchase and rehabilitation of rental units by
non-profit organizations to operate as affordable to low and
very -low income tenants. None were funded during FY 15-16.
During FY 15-16 no rehabilitation of owner -occupied units were
completed.
MOBILE HOME PARK
Ongoing. The City completed 19 mobile home rehabilitation
PRESERVATION
projects during FY 15-16. The Zoning Code requires Planning
Commission approval to convert to another land use.
INCENTIVES FOR AFFORDABLE
Implementing ordinance in effect, 206 density bonus units
HOUSING
currently exist in the City as a result of this ordinance.
MANUFACTURED HOUSING
Standards incorporated into zoning code, offer development
review streamlining through staff level processing; adopted May
1998.
(ADUS)
Staff is working on a Code Amendment to Title 13 of Costa
SECOND UNITS
Mesa Municipal Code related to second units for compliance
with new state regulations (Senate Bill SB 1069 and
Assembly Bill 2299) approved by the Governor on
September 27, 2016.
ACCESSORY APARTMENTS
In 2016, one accessory apartment was approved, under
construction or completed at 2967 Ceylon Drive.
FEDERAL/STATE HOUSING
Ongoing. 48 single- and multiple -family units constructed over
PROGRAMS
the last several years through a combination of public/private
partnerships. No new units were constructed in the past year.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (11t Edition)
Page 68
• U71.1.
HOUSING ASSISTANCE
Ongoing rental assistance voucher program (formerly Section 8)
assistance through OCHA, during FY 15-16.
SHARED HOUSING
No programs are offered by the City, Senior Center, or County.
ZONING ORDINANCE REVIEW
Ongoing. See Mixed -Use Developments.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR FIRST-TIME
Small lot common interest development standards have been
HOMEBUYERS (FTHB)
adopted since 2001 to promote development for first time home
buyers.* The City also adopted Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance
in 2014 to further promote homeownership and development of
fee simple lots.
LAND ACQUISITIONS
No land acquisitions occurred in 2016.
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS
A Mixed -Use Overlay District has been approved for the Bristol
Street corridor area and Westside Costa Mesa. This overlay
district, in conjunction with Urban Plan documents, will allow
mixed-use development opportunities, and potentially 4,226
additional units by the year 2025.
HOUSING SUPPLY IMPACT
Ongoing.
ASSESSMENT
REZONE REVIEW
In 2016, 1 rezone to residential was approved at 2850 Mesa
Verde Drive East (R-16-05) from C1 to R1 for a 10 -unit
development.
DEVELOPMENT MONITORING
Ongoing activity.
PROGRAM
CDBG FUNDING FOR HOMELESS
During FY 15-16, 9 individuals were provided homelessness
SHELTER
prevention services (i.e., rental assistance to prevent eviction or
deposit assistance to move into housing and rapid housing),
plus 41 individuals were provided transitional housing
assistance and services. 2 individuals were also funded with
Rapid Rehousing.
ADEQUATE SITES
• With the termination of the City's Redevelopment Agency
based on Supreme Court opinion relative to AB1X26 and
AB1 X27 effective February 1, 2012, the future of affordable
housing project sites and financing is being determined.
• A total of 115 new and replaced housing units were
completed construction in 2016. **
SINGLE -ROOM OCCUPANCY AND
Ongoing. Policy was adopted in 1991; three projects are
FAMILY -ROOM OCCUPANCY
completed and occupied for a total of 247 units; including 91
HOTELS
senior units and 11 SRO units.
FAIR HOUSING ASSISTANCE
The City is a member of a region -wide effort to ensure equal
access to housing. Generally, activities have included
investigation, resolution and education. During FY 15-16, 314
Costa Mesa households were assisted with fair housing issues.
INCENTIVES FOR AFFORDABLE
Accessibility is now required through ADA standards.
SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
A 50 percent density increase for construction of very -low
income senior housing is provided in the Density Bonus
Program.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (111 Edition)
Page 69
ProgramHousing
COMMON INTEREST
In 2016, 323 units of common interest developments and small
DEVELOPMENTS/SMALL LOT
lot subdivisions were approved, under construction or
SUBDIVISIONS
completed.
CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS
No apartment conversions were approved in 2016.
PRESERVATION OF AT -RISK
No new activity.
HOUSING
DENSITY BONUS COMPLIANCE
Annual review conducted to ensure compliance; 204 affordable
MONITORING
units (of the 206 units) are in compliance with the density bonus
program that exist in the City. As of 2016, 25 of the 27
properties participating in the Density Bonus Program are in
compliance with the program's requirements in terms of
maximum affordable rental rates. A separate report was
provided to the Planning Commission and City Council on the
status of the Density Bonus units on May 31, 2017.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1St Edition)
Costa Mesa
City of Costa Mesa
Table C2 - Housing Program Status
(January 2016 — December 2016)
Page 70
*Master plan screening for 51 additional live/work and residential units were approved in 2016
(UMP -15-005 & UMP -16-001). The development plans are in process.
Affordability by Household Incomes
Housing Element Programs
Very Low- Moderate- Above
Total Units
Low- Income Income Moderate -
Income Income
HOUSING REHABILITATION-
0
0
0
0
0
OWNER
HOUSING REHABILITATION-
0
0
0
0
0
RENTER
MOBILE HOME REHABILITATION
19
0
0
0
19
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
0
0
0
0
0
CONSTRUCTION
GRANNY FLATS AND
ACCESSORY APARTMENTS
0
0
0
1
1
CONSTRUCTION
FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER
0
0
0
0
0
this program is no lon er available
NEW SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY
0
0
0
0
0
HOTEL ROOMS
PRESERVE AT -RISK UNITS
0
0
0
0
0
CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS
N/A
0
APPROVED
SOBECA
48
48
URBAN PLANS
Mesa West
0
0
MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENTS
Bluffs
APPROVED*
Residential
3
3
Owenrshi
REZONE REVIEW
10
10
*Master plan screening for 51 additional live/work and residential units were approved in 2016
(UMP -15-005 & UMP -16-001). The development plans are in process.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (151 Edition)
Costa Mesa
Table D -
Approved & Completed Residential Units
Page 71
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1st Edition)
Page 72
The following is a list of residential units approved in 2016 and units completed and under
construction approved in previous years.
APPROVED PROJECTS
No. of Units
Building Type
Address
56 Units
Detached
929 Baker St.
33 Units
Detached
2626 Harbor Blvd.
5 Units
Detached
548 Victoria St.
2 Units
Detached
2156 Myran Dr.
6 Units
Detached
592 Hamilton St.
10 Units
Detached
522 & 526 Bernard St.
13 Units
Detached
300, 316, and 320 22nd St. and
2212 and 2216 Santa Ana Ave.
4 Units
Detached
127 23rd St.
111 Units
Attached; assisted Living
1640 Monrovia Ave.
2 Units
Detached
2053 Tustin Ave.
2 Units
Detached
788 Center St.
2 Units
Detached
166 Rochester St.
393 Units
Apartments
595 Anton Blvd.
639 Units Total
APPROVED PROJECTS• •
No. of Units
Building Type
Address
8 Units
Detached
133-139 E. 21St St.
4 Units
Detached
165-171 22nd St.
4 Units
Detached duplex (2 duplexes)
2136 Thurin St.
2 Units
Detached
2242 Pacific Ave.
2 Units
Detached
1808 Pomona Ave.
2 Units
Detached
146 E 18th St.
10 Units
Detached
531 Bernard St.
2 Units
Detached
162 E. 18th St.
2 Units
Detached
155 Flower St.
2 Units
Detached
163 Flower St.
24 Units
Detached condos
650 Hamilton St.
2 Units
Detached
1620 Orange Ave.
2 Units
Detached
189 & 191 Merrill Pl.
2 Units
Detached
355 Rochester St.
2 Units
Detached
215 Knox PI.
2 Units
Detached
288 E 15th St.
28 Units
Detached
1239 Victoria St.
250 Units
Attached/Apartments
580 Anton Blvd.
7 Units
Detached
2880 Mesa Verde Dr. E.
32 Units
Detached live/work
1672 Placentia Ave.
2 Units
Detached
320 E. 18th St.
2 Units
Detached
1944 Church St.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1't Edition)
Page 73
APPROVED
PROJECTS•
• •
No. of Units
Building Type
Address
5 Units
Detached
2661 Orange Ave.
14 Units
Detached live/work
2075 Placentia Ave.
37 Units
Detached condos
573-591 Victoria St.
82 Units
Detached; 40 live/work, 49 residential
1620-1644 Whittier Ave.
7 Units
Detached condos
789 & 795 Paularino Ave.
15 Units
Detached live/work
2026 Placentia Ave.
2 Units
Detached
119 Cecil PI.
5 Units
Detached
2333 Elden Ave.
5 Units
Detached
261 Mesa Dr.
14 Units
Attached condos
2460 Newport Blvd.
240 Units
Apartments
125 E. Baker St.
4 Units
Detached
2068 Maple Ave.
177 Units
42 detached live/work, 89 attached 671 W. 17th St.
live/work, 46 residential lofts
1,000 Units Total
COMPLETED
UNITS
No. of Units
Building Type
Address
6 Units
Detached
2183, 2187, & 2191 Miner St.
7 Units
Detached
1259 Victoria St.
6 Units
Detached condos
789 & 795 Paularino Ave.
31 Units
Attached live/work
1677 & 1695 Superior Ave.
4 Units
Detached
1631-1645 Tustin Ave.
6 Units
Detached
687 Victoria St.
2 Units
Detached
334 E. 16th St.
2 Units
Detached
217 Cabrillo St.
1 Unit
Detached; accessory unit
2967 Ceylon Dr.
6 Units
Detached
2366 Orange Ave.
16 Units
30 Attached live/work; 6 residential
2023, 2025 & 2027 Placentia Ave.
5 Units
Detached
1974 Meyer PI.
1 Units
Detached
2160 Myran Dr. B
9 Units
Attached; 26 residential
2013-2029 Anaheim Ave.
7 Units
Detached; 40 live/work, 49 residential
1620-1644 Whittier Ave.
6 Units
Detached
2880 Mesa Verde Dr. E.
115 Units Total
TOTAL UNITS APPROVED IN 2016: 639 UNITS
TOTAL UNITS APPROVED AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1,000 UNITS
TOTAL UNITS COMPLETED: 115 UNITS (includes common interest and detached single family)
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (V Edition)
v
Costa
Appendix A
2015-2035 General Plan
Goals, Objectives, Policies
Page 74
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (1't Edition)
Costa Mesa
Appendix B
Housing Successor Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2015-2016
Page 75
Appendix A
2015-2035 Costa Mesa General Plan
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
- 2016 Annual Review -
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
Go.v► ,. oK.►E:rr►y FS vNn PoiA IFS
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES
1'\(;F 2
Each element of the General Plan contains goals and policies based upon the needs and
desires of the community, as derived from the previously adopted 2015-2035 General Plan,
background research, planning staff, and members of the City Council.
A goal is defined as a broad vision of what the community wants to achieve or provide to
residents, landowners, business owners and tourists. It is a statement of a desired condition
based on community values. Goals are general in nature and usually timeless. A policy is a
specific statement that guides decision-making. It indicates a commitment of the City to a
particular course of action. A policy is based on and helps implement a goal.
One of the objectives for the 2015-2035 General Plan and General Plan EIR was to review
the 2000 General Plan goals, objectives, and policies for relevancy, completion and
applicability for the long-term development in the City. City staff reviewed the goals,
objectives, and policies in the 2000 General Plan and determined if the goals, objectives, and
policies had been completed, and if not, determined their relevancy and applicability for the
2015-2035 General Plan. The following are the goals and associated objectives and policies
that have been set for the Costa Mesa 2015-2035 General Plan.
At the conclusion of each goal, objective or policy is a statement within [brackets] that
indicates one of four possible scenarios: 1) the goal, objective, or policy remains the same as
the 2000 General Plan, 2) the goal, objective or policy has been modified from the 2000
General Plan statement for the 2015-2035 General Plan, 3) the goal, objective or policy is a
new statement for the 2000 General Plan, or 4) in the case of the Housing Element, no
changes were made to the goals, objectives or policies. Examples of the wording for the
aforementioned scenarios are as follows:
1) [2000 GP Goal LU -1],
2) [2000 GP Policy LU -1A.4 —Modified for 2015-2035 GP],
3) [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP], and
4) [No Change].
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Land Use Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address land use are as follows:
Goal LU -1:
PAGE 3
A Balanced Community with a Mix of Land Uses to Meet Resident and Business Needs [2000 GP Goal
LU -1]
Objective LU -1A: Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the
community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level no
greater than can be supported by the infrastructure. [2000 GP Objective
LU -1A]
LU -1.1 Provide for the development of a mix and balance of housing opportunities,
commercial goods and services, and employment opportunities in consideration
of the needs of the business and residential segments of the community. [2000
GP Policy LU -1A.1]
LU -1.2 Balance economic gains from new development while preserving the character
and densities of residential neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -1.3 Strongly encourage the development of residential uses and owner -occupied
housing (single-family detached residences, condominiums, townhouses) where
feasible to improve the balance between rental and ownership housing
opportunities. [2000 GP Policy LU -1A.4]
LU -1.4 Promote housing and employment opportunities within planned development
areas to the extent feasible. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 A.5]
LU -1.5 Maintain a land use structure that strives to balance jobs and housing with
available infrastructure and public and human services. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Goal LU -2:
Preserve and Protect Residential Neighborhoods [2000 GP Goal LU -1]
Objective LU -2A: Promote land use patterns and development that contribute to
community and neighborhood identity. [2000 GP Objective LU -1C]
LU -2.1 In the event of damage or destruction, allow any legal conforming use in
existence at the time of adoption of the General Plan that is located in a
nonconforming development to be rebuilt to its original building intensity, as long
as any such rebuilding would not increase the development's nonconformity, and
the damage or destruction was in no way brought about by intentional acts of any
owner of such use or property. [2000 GP Policy LU -2A.4]
LU -2.2 Pursue maximum use of utility company funds and resources in undergrounding
existing overhead lines, and encourage undergrounding of utilities in the public
right-of-way for residential development consisting of five units or more, to the
extent feasible and practical. [2000 GP Policy LU -2A.9 — Modified for 2015-2035
GPI
LU -2.3 Develop standards, policies, and other methods to encourage the grouping of
individual parcels to eliminate obsolete subdivision patterns and to provide
improved living environments while being consistent with the neighborhood
character of the surrounding community. [2000 GP Policy LU -2A.5 — Modified for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-21135 GL:.NIi:RAL PLAN
GO X S, 011JU: -1INIS \ND POLICIFS
PAGE 4
LU -2.4 Do not allow "rounding up" when calculating the number of permitted residential
units, except for lots existing as of March 16, 1992, zoned R2 -MD that have less
than 7,260 square feet in area, and no less than 6,000 square feet, where
density calculation fractions of 1.65 or greater may be rounded up to two units.
[2000 GP Policy LU -2A.6]
LU -2.5 Allow creation of parcels without street frontage if sufficient easements are
provided for planned developments or common -interest developments consistent
with the neighborhood character. This policy does not apply to small lot
subdivisions. [2000 GP Policy LU -2A.7]
LU -2.6 Encourage increased private market investment in declining or deteriorating
neighborhoods. [2000 GP Policy LU -2A.8]
LU -2.7 Permit the construction of buildings over two stories or 30 feet only when it can
be shown that the construction of such structures will not adversely impact
surrounding developments and deprive existing land uses of adequate light, air,
privacy, and solar access. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 C.11]
LU -2.8 Limit building height to four stories above grade south of the 1-405 Freeway,
except for special purpose housing such as elderly, affordable, or student
housing, unless otherwise approved by a General Plan amendment. (A four-
story/five-level parking structure with roof deck parking on the fifth level is
considered a four-story structure.) [2000 GP Policy LU -1 C.2]
LU -2.9 Require appropriate building setbacks, structure orientation, and placement
windows to consider the privacy of adjacent residential structures within the
same project and on adjacent properties. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 CA]
LU -2.10 Promote lot consolidation of residential properties to the extent feasible and
practical, including the creation of larger single-family residential lots that exceed
the minimum 6,000 -square -foot requirement in neighborhoods where the
prevailing residential subdivision pattern features larger -sized residential lots.
[2000 GP Policy LU -1 C.5 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -2.11 Ensure adequate noise attenuation in urban design, such as walls for sound
attenuation, development of landscaped greenbelts, provision of landscape
berms, etc. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 C.6 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU -3:
Development that Maintains Neighborhood Integrity and Character [2000 GP Goal LU -1]
Objective LU -3A: Establish policies, standards, and procedures to minimize blighting
influences, and maintain the integrity of stable neighborhoods. [2000 GP
Objective LU -1 F]
LU -3.1 Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including mobile home
parks (and manufactured housing parks), from the encroachment of incompatible
or potentially disruptive land uses and/or activities. [2000 GP Policy LU -1F.1]
LU -3.2 Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or abandoned vehicles,
outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal buildings, and establish regulations to
abate weed -filled yards when any of the above are deemed to constitute a
health, safety, or fire hazard. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 F.2]
LU -3.3 Continue code enforcement as a high priority with regard to the regulation of
property maintenance standards citywide. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 F.3 — Modified
for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 (A, N1 , RA . PLAN
GOALS, OBJCIVES kND POLICIES
PAGE
LU -3.4 Ensure that residential densities can be supported by the infrastructure and are
compatible with existing residential neighborhoods in the surrounding area. [2000
GP Policy LU -1 F.4 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -3.5 Provide opportunities for the development of well-planned and designed projects
which, through vertical or horizontal integration, provide for the development of
compatible residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or public uses within a
single project or neighborhood. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 F.5]
LU -3.6 Facilitate revitalization of aging commercial centers by working with property
owners, developers, local businesses, and other community organizations to
coordinate efforts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -3.7 Promote development/design flexibility that encourages older or poorly
maintained high-density residential uses to be rehabilitated. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
LU -3.8 Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards, qualities, and
features that are in context with nearby development and surrounding residential
neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -3.9 Locate high-intensity developments or high -traffic -generating uses away from
low-density residential in order to buffer the more sensitive land uses from the
potentially adverse impacts of the more intense development or uses. [2000 GP
Policy LU -1A.3]
LU -3.10 Minimize effects of new development on the privacy and character of surrounding
neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -3.11 Promote small -lot residential development on long, narrow, single parcels or
combined residential lots. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -3.12 Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards, qualities, and
features that are in context with nearby development. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
LU -3.13 Prohibit construction of buildings which would present a hazard to air navigation,
as determined by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). [2000 GP Policy LU -
1 C.3 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -3.14 Certain development proposals which may include the construction or alteration
of structures more than 200 feet above ground level may require filing with the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC)
pursuant to federal and State law. If a filing requirement is determined to be
necessary in accordance with the procedures provided by State/federal
agencies, the filing of a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form
7460-1) shall be required prior to review and consideration of the proposed
development." Land Use Element (page LU -18) refers to the threshold stated
above. It shall be amended to refer to Filing FAA Form 7460-1 Notice of
Construction and Alteration, and not to Form 7480-1. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
LU -3.15 The City will ensure that development proposals, including the construction or
operation of a heliport or helistop comply fully with permit procedures under State
law, including referral of the project to the ALUC by the applicant, and with all
conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the Federal Aviation
Administration, ALUC, and Caltrans, including the filing of Form 7480-1 (Notice of
Landing Area Proposed) with the FAA. This requirement shall be in addition to
all other City development requirements. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTit'ES AND POLICIES
P kGE 6
LU -3.16 The City shall refer certain projects to the Airport Land Use Commission for
Orange County, as required by Section 21676 of the California Public Utilities
Code to determine consistency of the project(s) with the Airport Environs Land
Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU 3.17 New residential developments within the 60 dB CNEL noise contour of the airport
shall provide designated outdoor signage informing the public of the presence of
operating aircraft. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU -4:
New Development that Is Sensitive to Costa Mesa's Environmental Resources [2000 GP Goal LU -2]
Objective LU -4A: Encourage new development and redevelopment that protects and
improves the quality of Costa Mesa's natural environment and
resources. [2000 GP Objective LU -2A]
LU -4.1 Ensure that appropriate watershed protection activities are applied to all new
development and significant redevelopment projects that are subject to the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit during the
planning, project review, and permitting processes. [2000 GP Policy LU -2A.10]
LU -4.2 Avoid conversion of areas particularly susceptible to erosion and sediment loss
(e.g., steep slopes) and/or establish development guidelines that identifies these
areas and protects them from erosion and sediment loss. [2000 GP Policy LU -
2A.11]
LU -4.3 Preserve or restore areas that provide water quality benefits and/or are
necessary to maintain riparian and aquatic biota. [2000 GP Policy LU -2A.12]
LU -4.4 Promote site development that limits impact on and protects the natural integrity
of topography, drainage systems, and water bodies, and protect the integrity of
the bluff crest. [2000 GP Policy LU -2A.13]
LU -4.5 Promote integration of stormwater quality protection into construction and post -
construction activities, as required by the NPDES Stormwater Permit and the
City's Local Implementation Plan. [2000 GP Policy LU -2A.141
LU -4.6 Incorporate the principles of sustainability into land use planning, infrastructure,
and development processes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions consistent with
State goals. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU -5:
Adequate Community Services, Transportation System, and Infrastructure to Meet Growth [2000 GP
Goal LU -1 and Goal LU -3]
Objective LU -5A: Ensure availability of adequate community facilities and provision of the
highest level of public services possible, taking into consideration
budgetary constraints and effects on the surrounding area. [2000 GP
Objective LU -3A]
LU -5.1 Pursue annexation of certain areas within the City's Sphere of Influence to
provide land use regulation and city services within its jurisdiction. [2000 GP
Policy LU -3A.1]
LU -5.2 Strongly encourage protection and preservation of existing but underutilized
school sites for future recreational, social, or educational uses. [2000 GP Policy
LU -3A.2]
3015-303. (.ENI:IZ V. ITAN
GOALS, OBJEC"I I\ ES AND POI.ICIF:S
P V;F 7
LU -5.3 As appropriate and timely, consider the establishment of development impact fee
program(s) to fund additional fire and police personnel, library facilities, and
related equipment to meet the demands of additional growth in the City. [2000
GP Policy LU -3A.3 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -5.4 Require appropriate site and environmental analysis for future fire and police
station site locations or for the relocation or closure of existing fire and police
facilities. [2000 GP Policy LU -3A.4]
LU.5.5 Ensure that new development pays its fair share of impact fees such as park fees
and traffic impact fees. This can also include impact fees related to community
services (police protection services and fire emergency response services) or
library facilities, once adopted and applicable. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -5.6 Promote development of revenue -generating land uses to help defray the costs
of high quality public services. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -5.7 Encourage new development that is organized around compact, walkable,
mixed-use neighborhoods and districts to conserve open space resources,
minimize infrastructure costs, and reduce reliance on the automobile. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -5.8 Include an evaluation of impacts on utility systems and infrastructure in EIRs for
all major general plan amendment, rezone, and development applications. [2000
GP Policy LU -1 D.1 ]
LU -5.9 Phase or restrict future development in the City to that which can be
accommodated by infrastructure at the time of completion of each phase of a
multi -phased project. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 D.2]
LU -5.10 Building densities/intensities for proposed new development projects shall not
exceed the trip budget for applicable land use classifications, as identified in the
Land Use Element. Building intensities for proposed new development projects
shall not exceed the applicable floor area standards, except for the following
conditions:
(a) Limited deviations from the graduated floor -area ratio standards for the
commercial and industrial land use designations may be approved
through a discretionary review process. No deviation shall exceed a
0.05 increase in the FAR in the moderate traffic category, and no
deviation shall be allowed in the very low, low, and high traffic
categories. Deviations from the FAR standards shall not cause the daily
trip generation for the property to be exceeded when compared to the
existing daily trip generation for the site without the proposed project or
maximum allowable traffic generation for the Moderate Traffic FAR
category, whichever is greater.
(b) Additions to existing nonconforming nonresidential developments may
be allowed if the additions do not affect the overall traffic generation
characteristics of the development and if the additions do not
substantially affect the existing height and bulk of the development.
Additions to nonresidential developments shall be limited to those land
uses with traffic generation rates based on variables other than building
area square footage. Examples of such additions include, but are not
limited to: 1) Hotels/motels: Increases in the size of hotel rooms or
lobbies where no increase in the total number of rooms is proposed,
and 2) theaters: Increases to "back -stage" support areas or lobbies
where no increase in the total number of seats is proposed.
(c) In the above conditions, the new development shall be compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2015-2035G1{NER.AI. PLAN
GOALS, OB.IE(A IN ;SVD POLICIES
PkGE8
(d) Additional criteria for approving deviations from the FAR standards may
be established by policy of the City Council. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 E.1 —
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -5.11 Development plans shall be required for all phased development and approvals
and shall be approved by the Planning and Transportation Services Divisions
prior to the issuance of building permits. [2000 GP Policy LU -1 E.2]
LU -5.12 Development plans shall include an overall buildout plan, which can demonstrate
the ability of the circulation system to support the proposed level of development.
[2000 GP Policy LU -1 E.3]
LU -5.13 The City shall continue its annual preparation of the Development Phasing and
Performance Monitoring Program. The annual review will specifically address
major intersection operations in any mixed-use overlay area. [2000 GP Policy
LU -1 EA]
Goal LU -6:
Economically Viable and Productive Land Uses that Increase the City's Tax Base [2000 GP Goal LU -1]
Objective LU -6A:
Ensure the long-term productivity and viability of the community's
economic base. [2000 GP Objective LU -1 B]
LU -6.1
Encourage a mixed of land uses that maintain and improve the City's long-term
fiscal health. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.2
Continue to promote and support the vitality of commercial uses to meet the
needs of local residents and that support regional -serving commercial centers.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.3
Continue to prioritize commercial and industrial park use of properties north of 1-
405 and within the Airport Industrial District. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.4
Support the continued presence of incubator businesses in the action sports
industry and jobs -producing businesses in the Westside. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
LU -6.5
Encourage revitalization of existing, older commercial and industrial areas in the
Westside with new mixed-use development consisting of ownership housing
stock and live/work units. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.6
Continue to encourage and retain land uses that generate sustainable sales and
property tax revenues, including regional commercial destinations and
automobile dealerships. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.7
Encourage new and retain existing businesses that provide local shopping and
services. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.8
Provide efficient and timely review of development proposals while maintaining
quality customer service standards for the business, development, and
residential community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.9
Support the retention and growth of Class A office tenants, including corporate
headquarters for the action sports industry, biotech, and high technology
companies within the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-203: C;EN1, RAI, PLAN
CIOALS.06J11A I1�FIS kND1101ACIES
PVd;9
Objective LU -6113:
Encourage and facilitate activities that expand the City's revenue base.
[New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.10
Encourage a broad range of business uses that provide employment at all
income levels and that make a positive contribution to the City's tax base. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.11
Provide opportunities for mixed-use, office, manufacturing, and retail
development that respond to market and community needs in terms of size,
location, and cost. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.12
Track retail trends and tailor regulations to respond to market changes, maximize
revenue, and maintain the appropriate the business mix. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
LU -6.13
Encourage new development along major corridors that are pedestrian oriented
and includes a mixture of retail/service, residential, and office uses. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.14
Improve ease and accessibility to information to capture opportunities for
businesses to establish in Costa Mesa and bring high -skill and professional jobs
and new revenue sources into the community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.15
Promote unique and specialized commercial and industrial districts within the
City which allow for incubation of new or growing businesses and industries.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.16
Examine options for the development of new infrastructure for new technologies
and businesses that use those technologies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective LU -6C:
Retain and expand the City's diverse employment base, including office,
retail/service, restaurants, high-tech, action sports, boutique and
prototype manufacturing, and industrial businesses. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.17
Engage in activities that promote Costa Mesa as a great place to live, work, and
develop a business. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.18
Continue to work with surrounding cities to strengthen regional economic
development. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -6.19
Provide flexibility and support for development of residential, office, small retail
centers, and similar uses that would serve local residents and would also benefit
from the high visibility along major corridors outside of significant commercial or
industrial nodes. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU -7:
A Sound Local Sustainable Economy that Attracts Investment, Creates Educational Opportunities, and
Generates Employment Opportunities [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -7.1 Endeavor to create mixture of employment opportunities for all economic levels
of residents and businesses. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -7.2 Support linkages between local educational institutions and local industries and
businesses. Foster training, collaboration with employers, and new innovative
programs that increase job opportunities for residents and students attending
school locally. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -7.3 Foster and provide useful and efficient partnerships to implement economic
opportunities with private, non-profit, or other public agencies. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-21135 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, 01MV( I IN Ell AND 1`01A it"s
P \GIC Ill
LU -7.4 Cultivate an entrepreneurial and academic environment that fosters innovation
through non-traditional housing developments, flexible office spaces, experiential
development, and ensuring the diversity of retail/service throughout the urban
districts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -7.5 Support and provide flexibility for development projects and businesses which
produce, care, and maintain material goods or fixed assets meant to support the
production of market goods, especially for niche industries within the City of
Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -7.6 Seek out opportunities to attract primary businesses within stable industries and
support industries that already exist within the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
LU -7.7 Explore economic and employment opportunities to retain and strengthen the
unique industry niches along Bristol and Paularino, in the Westside, on East 17th
Street, and throughout North Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -7.8 Support the development of pedestrian plazas and gathering places, and
institutional spaces, as well as the more efficient use of existing spaces, to
support economic growth and branding of existing industries within the City. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU -8:
Promote a range of multiple uses at the Fairview Developmental Center site [New Goal for 2015-2035
GP]
LU -8.1 In anticipation of the potential closure or repurposing of the Fairview
Development Center site, the City will work with appropriate State agencies or
private entity (if the property is sold) to plan for a complementary mix of low -scale
residential, institutional, public facilities, open spaces, and recreational uses
within a campus setting. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU -9:
Ensure that Fairgrounds uses are consistent with the General Plan designation [New Goal for 2015-
2035 GP]
LU -9.1 Discourage changes in the allowable uses specified in the Fairgrounds General
Plan land use designation for the Orange County Fair & Event Center property.
Ensure that amendments to this General Plan designation are approved by the
electorate. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU -10:
Promote the growth of tourism [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective LU -10A: Promote structural improvements of visitor -oriented land uses. [New
Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -10.1 Engage with property owners, developers, and business owners to encourage
the revitalization of the hotel/motels. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-203 GI. :NER.AI. PLAN
GOALS, 013.11-1( 1 I\ ES 1ND POLICII{S
P VJ: I
LU -10.2 Provide incentives to motel development projects seeking to improve existing
motel facilities by increasing the hotel rating. These projects may include:
a. Updating building mechanical, electrical, or plumbing to comply with current
building standards
b. Updating physical improvements to the site
c. Adding hotel amenities to the site
d. Updating or improving the landscaping on the site
e. Updating or improving the facade of the building(s) [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Objective LU -10B: Promote growth of visitor -oriented land uses. [New Objective for 2015-
2035 GP]
LU -10.3 Motel and hotel land uses should be encouraged to be located near major
transportation corridors and close to key tourist/visitor draws, other recreation
venues, the airport, regional, and general local shopping centers. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
LU -10.4 Consider the interest of quality of stay for visitors when evaluating projects near
visitor -oriented land uses by requiring on-site amenities and upscale guest
services. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective LU -10C: Promote uses and events that make visitor -oriented business more
economically viable. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -10.5 Celebrate and promote the arts, culture, and industries of Costa Mesa through
special events, civic gatherings, and City marketing and tourism promotion
efforts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -10.6 Promote the development of small-scale manufacturing uses or other uses that
generate multiple secondary and tertiary markets that support business travel
tourism -related uses. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU -10.7 Maintain and enhance the City's status and image as a centrally located
destination and cultural center in Orange County. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2-113; (J VLR V1. PI„ �V
GO k]"', 011AJ] 1i lis 01) 1101 1( IFs
Ilk(; L 1'
Circulation Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address circulation are as follows:
Goal C-1:
Implement "Complete Streets" Policies on Roadways in Costa Mesa
Plan, develop, and implement a comprehensive transportation system that serves all users and modes
of travel. [2000 GP Goal CIR-1 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C-1 A: Create a transportation network that meets the mobility needs of all
Costa Mesa residents, businesses, and visitors. [2000 GP Objective
CIR-1A — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.1: Update the City's engineering standards for public and private streets to provide
for safe, comfortable, and attractive access and travel for pedestrians, bicyclists,
motorists, and transit users of all ages, abilities, and modes of travel. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.2: Allow for flexible use of public rights-of-way to accommodate all users of the
street system while maintaining safety standards. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.3: Complete and annually maintain a needs assessment for traffic service levels
and traffic safety. Develop and annually update a priority list of improvement
projects, with priorities based on: 1) correcting identified hazards; 2)
accommodating multimodal trips; 3) improving and/or maintaining peak -hour
traffic volumes at critical intersections; 4) improving efficiency of existing
infrastructure utilization; and 5) intergovernmental coordination. [2000 GP Policy
CIR-2C.2]
C-1.4: Pursue downgrade of arterials that no longer have the demand requiring their
buildout to planned capacity. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.5: Implement road diets on street segments with excess capacity to enhance
bicycle and pedestrian facilities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.6: Encourage the conversion of excess on -street parking spaces for expanded
sidewalk gathering places or landscaping. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.7: Encourage community participation in City processes and programs focused on
improving mobility and transportation facilities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.8: Pursue downgrade of 17th Street from 6 -lane Major Arterial to 4 -lane Primary
Arterial between Orange Ave and Tustin Avenue, through Master Plan of Arterial
Highways (MPAH) Amendment process with the Orange County Transportation
Authority. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C-1113: Preserve the character of our residential neighborhoods. [2000 GP
Objective CIR-1 A — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.9: Implement traffic calming measures that discourage speeding and cut -through
traffic on residential streets. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.14]
C-1.10: Encourage non -motorized transportation in residential areas by providing
sidewalks and implementing bicycle friendly design of local streets. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.11: Reduce or eliminate intrusion of traffic related to non-residential development on
local streets in residential neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2113; (Ai NER AI, PLAN
GO 11.5. 013.)11( I I\ FS VN 1) i OLK IFS
P V;FI 13
C-1.12: Prioritize intersection improvements which improve through traffic flow on Major,
Primary, and Secondary Arterials, and reduce impacts on local neighborhood
streets with emphasis on pedestrian safety. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.14]
C-1.13: Promote engineering improvements such as physical measures constructed to
lower speeds, improve safety, and otherwise reduce the impacts of motor
vehicles. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.14: Design and Implement transportation projects to meet local and regional system
capacity needs in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.15: Implement neighborhood approved traffic -calming measures in residential
neighborhoods and appropriate commercial areas, such as street narrowing,
curb extensions, roundabouts, landscaped medians, and radar speed feedback
signs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.16: Establish priority -ranking system to evaluate traffic -calming requests for
implementation throughout the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-1.17: Pursue programs that reduce vehicle speeds and cut -through traffic on local
streets. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal C-2:
Effectively Manage and Improve the Roadway System
Develop and maintain a robust and efficient vehicular circulation network. [2000 GP Goal CIR-1 —
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C -2A: Implement policies that encourage and accommodate all users while
maintaining the efficiency of the circulation system. [2000 GP Objective
CIR-1A — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.1: Establish a citywide crosswalk policy to address installation, maintenance,
removal, and enhancements of crosswalks at intersections and mid -block
locations. Crosswalk locations and treatment will be based on criteria including,
but not limited to safety, traffic volume, and concentration of pedestrian activity.
Potential enhancements may include leading pedestrian intervals at signalized
intersections, bulb -outs, and median refuges to reduce crossing distances. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.2: Avoid creation of frequent driveways for new development access in active
pedestrian areas that create conflict points between pedestrians and vehicles.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.3: Encourage commercial property owners to use shared driveway access and
interconnected roads within blocks, where feasible. Require driveway access
closures or consolidations, or both when a site is remodeled or redeveloped.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.4: Collaborate with law enforcement and public safety organizations to coordinate
policies and programs that would reduce injuries and deaths on the roadways.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.5: Designate routes for truck traffic to minimize potential conflicts between trucks
and cars, pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and vehicle access and circulation.
Establish by ordinance a truck map that depicts allowable truck routes within the
City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2113; (:U:SI�:R.AI. PL.AA
C0.11_.S, OBJE.('I IN 1115 AND 1`01.K IEll
P \(J 14
C-2.6: Periodically review and update traffic signal timing at all signalized intersections
to maintain traffic signal coordination and to accommodate bicycle and
pedestrian needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.7: Develop new traffic level of services criteria in accordance with SB 743 to meet
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.8: Continue the use of the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to
address local traffic level of service and impacts, with Level of Service "D" as the
threshold for meeting the City's significance criteria. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Objective C-2113: Construct street improvements and apply congestion management tools
to obtain efficient performance of the transportation system. [2000 GP
Objective CIR-1A – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.9: Incorporate the street system improvements identified in the General Plan
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) into the Capital Improvement Program. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.10: Continue to deploy intelligent transportation systems (ITS) strategies—such as
adaptive signal controls, fiber optic communication equipment, closed circuit
television cameras, real-time transit information, and real- time parking
availability information—to reduce traffic delays, lower greenhouse gas
emissions, improve travel times, and enhance safety for drivers, pedestrians, and
cyclists. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.11: Investigate all operational measures, including the use of one-way streets, to
improve traffic circulation and to minimize congestion for all travel modes. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-2.12: Investigate and utilize state-of-the-art transportation system management
technology and industry practices to address recurring and non-recurring traffic
events (i.e., special events, incident/emergency management). [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C-2.13: Continue to evaluate and pursue design and operational improvements
(medians, driveway closures, signal synchronization or phasing, parking or turn
restrictions, etc.) to improve the efficiency of intersections. [2000 GP Policy CIR-
2A.4]
Goal C-3:
Enhance Regional Mobility and Coordination
Encourage development of a regional transportation network that addresses regional mobility needs for
all modes of travel. [2000 GP Goal CIR-1 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C -3A: Promote development of transportation projects along regional
corridors. [2000 GP Objective CIR-1A – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-3.1: Maintain compliance with Orange County Congestion Management Plan (CMP)
requirements, including consistency with CMP level of service standards,
adoption of a seven-year capital improvement program, analysis of impacts of
land use decisions on the CMP highway system, and adoption and
implementation of deficiency plans when intersections do not meet adopted
performance standards. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-31135 (J; NERAL PLAN
GOAL'S. 013.11:( 11\ F.11 AND P01.I( IHS
11 k(d. 15
C-3.2: Support the goals and objectives of the Orange County Long Range
Transportation Plan, including expansion of transportation system choices,
improvement of transportation system performance, and sustainability of
transportation infrastructure. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-3.3: Support the goals and objectives of the SCAG Regional Transportation
Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), including expansion of
transportation system choices, improvement of transportation system
performance, and sustainability of transportation infrastructure. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C-3.4: Coordinate signal timing on all major arterials with a local signal synchronization
program consistent with the Orange County Traffic Signal Synchronization
Master Plan (TSSMP). [2000 GP Policy CIR-2A.2 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-3.5: Ensure Costa Mesa's input, participation, and discretionary review of applicable
region -wide transportation system policies, programs, and construction. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-3.6: Develop short-term and long-term improvements to the SR -55 corridor in
coordination with Caltrans and OCTA to address regional mobility needs. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-3.7: Promote the City's preferred alternative of undergrounding the SR -55 freeway
south of 19th Street within the City limits. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C -3B: Coordinate and partner with local and regional agencies to promote
projects and polices that improve regional mobility. [2000 GP Objective
CIR-1A — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-3.8: Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to maintain or improve mobility within the
City to achieve a standard Level of Service no worse than "D" at all intersections
under State or joint control. Intersection Level of Service analyses for General
Plan conditions for locations under State or joint control will be updated
periodically and presented to the City Council. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.12]
C-3.9: Consult with Caltrans and OCTA regarding the 1-405 widening project to
minimize adverse impacts to Costa Mesa's neighborhoods, businesses, and
streets. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-3.10: Coordinate with OCTA and other jurisdictions to remove Gisler Avenue Bridge
over the Santa Ana River from the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways
and County's Master Plan of Arterial Highways. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.181
C-3.11: Collaborate with Caltrans and neighboring jurisdiction to improve signal timing
and coordination along major arterials across jurisdictional boundaries. [2000 GP
Policy CIR-2A.3 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-3.12: Work closely with the State of California and other government agencies to
control traffic—related impacts of uses on State- or other agency -owned land (i.e.,
Orange County Fairgrounds, Orange Coast College, etc.). [2000 GP Policy CIR-
1 A.17]
C-3.13: Coordinate with other responsible agencies the planning, funding, prioritization,
and implementation of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit programs and supporting
infrastructure. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
(;() \I S. 06.)IJ I I\ FS -\ND POI.I('II{S
Goal C-4:
Promote Transportation Demand Management, Transit, and Efficiency
P \(71( 16
Utilize Transportation Demand Management strategies to manage demand and maximize available
capacity. [2000 GP Goal CIR-2 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C -4A: Encourage greater utilization of Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) strategies to reduce dependence on single -occupancy vehicles.
[2000 GP Objective CIR-2A — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.1: Support South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) trip reduction
programs, including park and ride lots, transit subsidies, carpool and vanpool
programs, flexible working hours, bicycle facilities, and other traffic reduction
strategies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.2: Support local and multi -jurisdictional car -sharing and bike -sharing programs.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.3: Consider implementing park -once approaches for multiuse districts and regional
destinations areas. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.4: Embrace innovative parking solutions that reduce the required spaced needed
for parking, such as automated parking lifts and elevators. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
C-4.5: Encourage and provide incentives for commercial, office, and industrial
development to provide preferred parking for carpools, vanpools, electric
vehicles, and flex cars. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.6: Encourage and support programs that increase vehicle occupancy, including the
provision of traveler information, shuttles, preferential parking for
carpools/vanpools, transit pass subsidies, and other methods. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C-4.7: Promote the combination of TDM measures as much more effective than any
single measure. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.8: Require discussion of transportation system management (TSM) and TDM
measures in all EIRs prepared for major projects. [2000 GP Policy Policy CIR-
2D.51
C-4.9: Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and housing into major
development projects to reduce vehicle use. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.8]
C-4.10: Allow the application of transportation management rideshare programs,
integration of complementary land uses, and other methods to reduce project
related average daily and peak hour vehicle trips to achieve consistency with
allocated trip budgets. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.10]
Objective C-4113: Promote regional and local transit services as an alternative to
automobile travel. [2000 GP Objective CIR-1A — Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
C-4.11: Ensure that roadways designated as transit routes can accommodate transit
vehicle circulation and convenient pedestrian access to and from transit stops.
[2000 GP Policy CIR-1 A.11 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.12: Review all capital improvement projects to ensure improvements located on
existing and planned transit routes include modification of street, curb, and
sidewalk configurations to allow for easier and more efficient transit operations
and improved passenger access. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 Gf:51{R V. IT AN
GOA I' S' n1UIJ'I [\ H:S .ASD 1101.K INS
11 VGI,: 17
C-4.13: Provide transit stop amenities that facilitate access to and from transit stops and
transfer locations. These may include pedestrian pathways approaching stops,
high-quality benches and shelters, traveler information systems (real-time transit
arrival information), and bike storage and bicycle connections. Bus stops should
accommodate timed transfers between buses and other transit services where
necessary. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.14: Encourage new development along major transit corridors to provide efficient and
safe access to transit stops and public sidewalks. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.15: Support and participate with OCTA ACCESS Service in providing transportation
assistance to senior citizens and the disabled. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.16: Consult with OCTA for transit services, such as changes to bus routes, bus
stops, and hours of operation. Additionally, coordinate with OCTA for changes to
transit services provided for seniors, the disabled, and transit dependent
populations. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.17: Consult with the Newport -Mesa Unified School District to maintain school bus
services provided for local schoolchildren. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.18: Coordinate with OCTA to improve transit services in the City, including strategies
such as bus rapid transit, express services, community circulators, and other
strategies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-4.19: Encourage new local transit programs in coordination with OCTA, consisting of
shuttle services to local and regional destinations. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GPI
C-4.20: Coordinate with OCTA to construct bus turnouts at appropriate locations, with
attractive shelters designed for safe and comfortable use. [2000 GP Policy CIR-
2B.1 ]
C-4.21: Require discussion of transit service needs and site design amenities for transit
ridership in EIR for major projects. [2000 GP Policy CIR-2D.41
Goal C-5:
Ensure Coordination between the Land Use and Circulation Systems
Facilitate close coordination between development of land use and circulation system. [2000 GP Goal
CIR-2 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C -5A: Coordinate land use policies and development activities that support a
sustainable transportation system. [2000 GP Objective CIR-1A —
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-5.1: Ensure that new development projects are consistent with the vehicular trip
budgets, where adopted. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-5.2: Require that large developments and redevelopments provide short-term and
long-term vehicular traffic impact studies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-5.3: Encourage permitted General Plan land uses which generate high traffic volumes
to be located near major transit and transportation corridors to minimize vehicle
use, congestion, and delay. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.9]
C-5.4: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by phasing new
developments to levels that can be accommodated by roadways existing or
planned to exist at the time of completion of each phase of the project. [2000 GP
Policy GM -1A.2 and Policy CIR-1A.16]
21115-2035 GENI''RAL MAN
GO ki"', 01MIJ'I 1\ FS AND P(')L.ICIIi�
P AGF 18
C-5.5: Promote development of mixed-use projects to reduce number of vehicle trips.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-5.6: Coordinate the design and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle ways in major
residential, shopping and employment centers, parks, schools, other public
facilities, public transportation facilities, and bicycle networks with adjacent cities.
[2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.3]
C-5.7: Require dedication of right-of-way, in an equitable manner, for development that
increases the intensity of land use. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.6]
C-5.8: Minimize circulation improvements that will necessitate the taking of private
property on existing developed properties. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.19]
C-5.9: Require that circulation necessary to provide or attain the minimum traffic level of
service standard at an intersection to which a development project contributes
measureable traffic be completed within three years of issuance of the first
building permit for such development project, unless additional right-of-way or
coordination with other government agencies is required to complete the
improvement. Improvements may be required sooner if, because of extraordinary
traffic generation characteristics of the project or extraordinary impacts to the
surrounding circulation system, such improvements are necessary to prevent
significant adverse impacts. [2000 GP Policy CIR-21D.1]
C-5.10: Allow for construction of circulation improvements for a phased development
project to be constructed commensurate with the project construction, based
upon the findings of a traffic study approved by the City of Costa Mesa. [2000 GP
Policy CIR-21D.2]
C-5.11: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by phasing new
development to levels that can be accommodated by roadways existing or
planned to exist at the time of completion of each phase of the project. [2000 GP
Policy GM -1 A.2 and Policy CIR-1A.16]
C-5.12: Support consistency with the Orange County Sustainable Communities Strategy
(OC SCS) and SCAG RTP/SCS by providing an integrated land use and
transportation plan to meet mandated emissions reduction targets consistent with
SB 375. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C-56: Establish strategies and processes that allow large developments to
analyze and mitigate traffic impacts and infrastructure needs. [2000 GP
Objective CIR-21D — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-5.13: Require that new development projects improve access to and accommodations
for multimodal transportation. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-5.14: Require developers of new building and redevelopment/reuse projects as part of
the project development review process that are located along bus routes to pay
a designated fair share of the cost of providing improved bus stop facilities and
related street furniture or, where appropriate, dedicate land for improved bus stop
facilities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-5.15: Consider the needs of the transportation and infrastructure system early for large
developments and coordinate with developers to design projects that minimize
traffic impacts and infrastructure demands, and implement complete streets
wherever feasible. Alternatively, address transportation and infrastructure system
impacts through the implementation of development agreements. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-203; (;1-,N1,:R.AL PLAN(;().kLs,OBJE( '11% FIS kND POLI( IFS
Goal C-6:
Fund and Evaluate the City's Transportation Network
P k(;V I9
Explore opportunities to secure funding for enhancing the circulation system. [New Goal for 2015-2035
GP]
Objective C -6A: Pursue funding sources to maintain and enhance the transportation and
infrastructure system. [2000 GP Objective CIR-2C — Modified for 2015-
2035 GP]
C-6.1: Evaluate traffic collision data regularly, and identify top collision locations for
automobiles, bicycles, pedestrians, transit in Costa Mesa. Develop appropriate
countermeasures and pursue funding from all available sources to implement
them. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.2: Continue to develop and maintain long-range capital improvement programs
consistent with the General Plan and M2 eligibility requirements. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C-6.3: Coordinate with OCTA to fund, develop, and maintain a Master Plan of Streets
and Highways consistent with the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH).
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.4: Require a locally collected and administered traffic mitigation fee program to
guarantee that new development pays for its fair share toward improvements
resulting in reductions in air pollutant and GHG emissions and traffic impacts
generated by the development. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.5: Actively pursue local, State, and federal funding to implement, maintain, and
evaluate the transportation and infrastructure system. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
C-6.6: Supplement funding from annual fees or assessments on existing and new
development with grants and other nonlocal sources. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
C-6.7: Develop strategies to implement an infrastructure and transportation system to
be consistent with State policies on resiliency and sustainability. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C-6.8: Amend the General Plan, if necessary, to be responsive to evolving funding
requirements and to comply with State and federal regulations affecting the goals
and policies of the Circulation Element. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.9: Coordinate with OCTA and Caltrans to seek funding and implementation
solutions to improve Newport Boulevard at the terminus of the State Route 55
freeway to relieve congestion from regional traffic. [2000 GP Policy CIR-2A.1
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.10: Review the City's transportation impact fee program on a regular basis, and
adjust fees as needed to ensure that funding is available for planned
transportation improvements that will benefit all travel modes. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C-6.11: Prioritize funding and timing for implementing transportation improvements.
Consider prioritizing multimodal projects that provide the most benefit to all
users. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.12: Require that every new development project pay its share of costs associated
with the mitigation of project generated impacts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 (JINER \I. ITAN
GOALS, 013JI-A I 1\ F's VNn 1101.1(11{s
P V(J 21)
C-6.13: Measure M2 sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace private funding
which has been committed for any project. [2000 GP Policy GM -1A.5 — Modified
for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.14: The City's seven-year capital improvement program shall be adopted and
maintained in conformance with the provisions of Measure M2 for the purpose of
maintaining the established level of service standard. [2000 GP Policy GM -1A.6
— Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.15: Maintain a traffic impact fee for circulation system improvements to the Master
Plan of Streets and Highways; review and update fees on a regular basis. [2000
GP Policy GM -1A.4 AND Policy CIR-2D.3 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C-6113: Evaluate the transportation system to ensure that it meets the City's
circulation goals. [2000 GP Objective CIR-2A — Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
C-6.16: Provide an annual Capital Improvement Program General Plan consistency
report. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.17: Provide annual public review of implementation status reports of goals, policies,
and objectives stated in the Circulation Element. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C-6.18: Adopt and seek out methods and processes that provide appropriate and
accurate data for evaluating the performance of the transportation and
infrastructure system. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal C-7:
Promote a Friendly Active Transportation System in Costa Mesa
Create a bicycle and pedestrian friendly environment throughout Costa Mesa for all types of users and
all trip purposes in accordance with the five "Es:" Education, Encouragement, Enforcement,
Engineering, and Evaluation. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
The following recommendations are aimed at providing the maximum flexibility in meeting the goals and
policies in this Circulation Element.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Paths
Objective C -7A: Expand, enhance, and protect the existing bicycle and pedestrian
network to provide a comprehensive, system of Class I, Class II, Class
III, and Class IV facilities to increase connectivity between homes, jobs,
schools transit, and recreational resources in Costa Mesa. [New
Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.1: Develop an extensive bicycle and pedestrian backbone
network through the use of standard and appropriate
innovative treatments. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.2: Plan and install new bicycle lanes on Major Arterials,
where feasible and appropriate. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.3: Plan and install shared lane markings ("sharrows") and
signage on appropriate existing and planned bicycle
routes where bicycle lane implementation is demonstrated
to be infeasible. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.4: Where feasible, Class I shared -use paths should be a
priority for future developments. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS. OBJECTIbES AND POLICIES
P,kGF 21
Recommendation C-7.5:
Plan and install new shared -use paths in utility corridors
and/or along flood control channels, and extend existing
bicycle and shared -use paths. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-7.6:
Plan and complete north/south multi-purpose and bicycle
routes through the City to augment the east/west route.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.7:
Consider the identification and feasibility of potential Class
IV cycle tracks. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.8:
When feasible, implement the completion through regional
coordination of the Costa Mesa roadway and trail
segments of regional bikeway plans. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.9:
Encourage reallocation of roadway rights-of-way where
appropriate to accommodate shared -use path and bicycle
facilities, while preserving and respecting the character of
each adjacent neighborhood. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-7.10:
Support bicycle improvement projects that close gaps in
the regional bicycle network either by implementing
specific projects recommended in the Plan or through
other treatments. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.11:
Encourage bicycle projects that connect local facilities and
neighborhoods to major bicycle corridors. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.12:
Work cooperatively with adjoining jurisdictions and
local/regional agencies to coordinate bicycle planning, and
implementation activities. Where required, develop
consistent active transportation plans and policies with
regional and adjacent agencies. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.13:
Prioritize safe access to major regional trails such as the
OC Loop/Santa Ana River Trail and the Newport Back Bay
Trail System. Where feasible, plan and provide a
continuous low -stress Class I and/or Class IV facility from
east to west across the city between these facilities. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.14:
Explore favorable opportunities to remove parking to
accommodate bicycle lanes. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-7.15:
Identify favorable opportunities to retain parallel parking
adjacent to sidewalks to maintain pedestrian safety. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.16:
Consider every street in Costa Mesa as a street that
cyclists could use. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.17:
Link on -road and off-road bicycle and pedestrian facilities
within Costa Mesa to existing and planned facilities in
adjacent and regional jurisdictions. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
2015-2035 (J NERAL PLAN
GOALS. OBA GYRE'S ,\ND POLICIES
Recommendation C-7.18
Recommendation C-7.19:
Recommendation C-7.20
Bike and Pedestrian Facilities
P k(;E 22
Low -stress design techniques should be considered where
necessary to attract a wide variety of users. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
Establish designated safe routes to schools for biking and
walking. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Designate walkable districts in the City. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Objective C -7B: Provide end -of -trip facilities that support the bicycle network. [New
Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.21: Provide bike parking and bike -related amenities at public
facilities and along public rights-of-way. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.22:
Pursue public-private partnerships to furnish local
businesses with secure bike parking and other related
amenities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.23:
Develop and adopt bicycle parking equipment standards
for bicycle parking to be installed within the public right-of-
way and post on the City website. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.24:
Work with local schools and colleges to provide ample and
secure bike parking and other related amenities for
students and employees. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.25:
Work with OCTA to maximize bicycle amenities, such as
bus stop solar lighting and bicycle lockers, at high-volume
transit stops. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.26:
Prioritize the installation of bicycle -scale and/or
pedestrian -scale lighting. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.27:
Encourage and incentivize providing attended bicycle
parking services, such as a bicycle valet, at major City
events, OC Fair, Farmers' Markets, holiday festivals, and
other community events. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.28:
Prioritize schools with the highest auto traffic volume
during peak hours and insufficient parking for staff and
parents. Plan and install bicycle facilities adjacent those
schools. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.29:
Provide bike parking and bike -related amenities at public
facilities and along public right-of-way. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
"First and Last Mile" Programs
PAGE: 23
Objective C -7C: Encourage sustainable modes of transportation to fill gaps between the
first and last miles of trips (walking, biking, ride sharing, transit, taxi and
car -sharing). [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.30: Identify citywide infrastructure needed to create the
interconnected multi -trail system. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.31: Improve the quality, aesthetics, and safety of high -use
pedestrian corridors. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.32: Development and implement a bicycle sharing system.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.33: Proposed new mode split goals
• 50 percent motor vehicles
• 10 percent transit
• 10 percent bicycles
• 20 percent walking
• 10 percent carpools, taxi, transportation network
company services, and car sharing [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.34: Establish a goal for all trips of less than three miles to be
30 percent by bicycle, and establish a goal of less than 1
mile to be 30 percent by walking. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.35: Consider implementing a small-scale transportation
system to encourage mode shift to popular destinations as
defined by users. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal C-8:
Create a Safer Place to Walk and Ride a Bicycle
Provide a safe, convenient, and attractive bicycling and pedestrian environment. Apply design
standards, enforcement of traffic laws, maintenance practices, and safety awareness campaigns to
encourage and increate the use of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Design and Way -finding
Objective C -8A: Develop bicycle and pedestrian facilities with approved uniform design
standards, and implementation of way -finding signage providing
information on various destinations. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.1: Require that all facilities be designed in accordance with
the latest federal, state, and local standards. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.2: Provide and maintain bicycle and pedestrian signal
detectors, informational signage, and lighting, along City
bikeways. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
1015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PACE. 24
Recommendation C-8.3:
Develop, install and maintain a bicycle and pedestrian
way -finding signage program to indicate route turns, the
presence of intersecting bikeways, streets and distances
Recommendation C-8.10:
to nearby local and major destinations. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.4:
Develop a list of acceptable plant materials for shared use
paths that will not damage, create security problems or
Recommendation C-8.11:
hazards for bicyclists. Incorporate canopy trees and
native, drought -tolerant landscaping as a standard Class I
facility (shared use path) feature. Encourage the use of
Recommendation C-8.12:
sustainable drainage designs, such as bio-swales. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.5:
Utilize Complete Streets elements as demonstrated in
most recent versions of National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Street Design
Guide and Bikeway Design Guide. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.6:
Crosswalks will include high visibility crossing treatments.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.7:
Paint direction arrows on all bike lanes and bike paths to
reduce the risk of collisions. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Safety Enforcement and Reporting
Objective C-86: Continue and expand enforcement activities that enhance safety of
bicyclists on bike paths and roadways. [New Objective for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-8.8: Enforce laws that reduce bicycle/pedestrian/motor vehicle
incidents and conflicts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.9:
Train police officers on bicyclists' rights and
responsibilities and bicycle/pedestrian/vehicle collision
evaluation. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.10:
Utilize the City's bicycle -mounted patrol officer program to
educate and enforce pedestrian and bicycle user
violations not necessarily to punish, but to correct. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.11:
Promote efficient reporting mechanisms for behaviors that
endanger cyclists and pedestrians. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.12:
Develop a partnership with the school community to
establish and update suggested routes to schools for
biking and walking. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Safe Roadway Conditions
Objective C -BC: Maintain bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are clear of debris and
provide safe conditions for all users. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.13: Establish routine maintenance schedule/standards for
bicycle and pedestrian facilities such as sweeping, litter
removal, landscaping, repainting of striping, signage, and
signal actuation devices. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJL:C"11\'ES A\1) POLK IFS
P SCF: 25
Recommendation C-8.14: Encourage and empower citizens to report maintenance
issues that impact bicyclist and pedestrian safety
including, but not limited to, potholes, sidewalk lifting, and
overgrown vegetation. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.15: Establish procedures for responding to citizen reports in a
timely manner. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.16: Where feasible, reduce or eliminate conflict points such as
driveways that cross the sidewalk. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Safety Education
Objective C-811): Increase education of bicycle and pedestrian safety through programs
and training of school children and the public. [New Objective for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.17: Create, fund, and implement bicycle -safety curricula and
provide to the public, tourists, various ethnic groups,
diverse ages and disadvantaged communities. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.18:
Provide multilingual bicycle -safety maps and brochures
(print and electronic versions) in languages that are widely
used in Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.19:
Encourage schools to develop and provide bicycle -safety
curricula for use in elementary, middle, and high schools,
such as the Bicycle Rodeo events. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.20:
Support marketing and public awareness campaigns
aimed at improving bicycle and pedestrian safety. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.21:
Provide a user education program developed and
promoted to encourage proper trail use and etiquette.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.22:
Work with local bicycle advocacy organizations to develop,
promote and support a series of bicycle education classes.
Include information on bicycle safety, maintenance, and
security. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.23:
Develop and distribute education material regarding
bicycle and pedestrian responsibilities and laws. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Safety Data
Objective C -8E: Monitor and analyze bicycle and pedestrian safety. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.24: Request bicycle and pedestrian collision reports from local
law enforcement periodically and consider improvements
to address problem areas. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-203; GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJEC11\ Es kND POLICIES
PAGV 26
Recommendation C-8.25: Establish an expedited process to report maintenance and
safety concerns, e.g. pavement markings (sharrows,
missing bike lane lines), ramps, curb cut-outs, broken
walk/bike signal buttons, signage, minor maintenance of
bike lanes/paths (street/path sweeping, minor surface
patching, inoperable traffic signal bicycle detection). [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.26: Conduct Roadside Safety Audits (RSAs) on a regular
basis to provide periodic snapshots of roadway safety,
including bicycle, pedestrian, equestrian, skateboard, and
other non -motorized modes of travel. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Goal C-9:
Integrate Active Transportation Elements into Circulation System and Land Use Planning
Provide bikeway and walkway facilities that are integrated with other transportation systems and land
use planning decisions. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Land Use Planning Decisions and Active Transportation
Objective C -9A: Consider bicycle and pedestrian facilities during land use planning
process. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.1: Incorporate the Costa Mesa Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan into the City's General Plan. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.2:
Ensure that all current and proposed land use planning is
consistent with the Costa Mesa Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.3:
Require new developments provide adequate bicycle
parking and pedestrian access. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-9.4:
Collaborate with property owners to increase bicycle
parking over time. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.5:
Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and
housing into major development projects to reduce vehicle
use. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.6:
Provide a fully integrated network of modern active
transportation facilities to and from major activity centers
and residential centers. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.7:
Identify areas where an increase in the need for active
transportation can reasonably be anticipated due to
housing/business growth. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.8:
Make commercial and recreational areas more enjoyable
for pedestrians by implementing measures such as
providing shade, planting trees, eliminating visible parking
lots and vacant land, and minimizing long stretches of
building fagade. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.9:
Develop creative, artistic, and functional bicycle parking
solutions, and install them throughout the City as a
standard. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Active Transportation in Developments
PAGE 27
Objective C-913: Integrate bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements during planning,
design and implementation of transportation projects. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.10: Promote the preservation of bicycle access within all
roadway rights-of-way, as well as the development of
innovative, safety -enhanced on -street facilities, such as
bicycle boulevards and cycle tracks. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.11:
Establish bike boulevards on streets with low traffic
volumes and slow speeds to encourage bicycling. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.12:
Proactively seek new opportunities for acquisition of
abandoned rights-of-way and other lands for the
development of new multi -use pathways that integrate with
the planned network. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.13:
Improve the safety of all road users through the
implementation of neighborhood traffic -calming
treatments. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.14
Detours through or around construction zones should be
designed for safety and convenience, and with adequate
signage for cyclists and pedestrians. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.15:
Provide opportunity for public input prior to the removal of
an existing bicycle or pedestrian facility or the approval of
any development or street improvement that would
preclude these planned facilities. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Goal C-10:
Promote an Active Transportation Culture
Develop educational and promotional programs to increase bicycle and pedestrian usage that respects
and accommodates all users to foster a more balanced transportation system. [New Goal for 2015-2035
GP]
An Active Transportation Culture
Objective C -10A: Encourage more people to walk and bicycle by supporting programs
that foster community support for bicycling and walking, and raise public
awareness about active transportation. [New Objective for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-10.1: Support marketing and public awareness campaigns
through a variety of media aimed at promoting bicycling
and walking as a safe, healthy, cost-effective,
environmentally friendly transportation choice. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.2: Support programs aimed at increasing bicycle and walk
trips by providing incentives, recognition, or services that
make bicycling and walking a more convenient
transportation mode. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GO.1Es. OBJECTI\ FS k,VD 1101.ICII11S
P k(A" 28
Recommendation C-10.3:
Promote bicycling and walking at City -sponsored and
public events, such as Earth Day, Bike to Work
Day/Month, farmers' markets, public health fairs, art walks,
craft fairs, and civic events. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-10.4:
Encourage and promote bicycle related businesses within
Costa Mesa including, but not limited to, involvement of
civic clubs and organizations. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-10.5:
Promote active transportation events in Costa Mesa to
raise awareness and encourage bicycling, including, but
not limited to, those that may involve temporary road
closures, bike to work/school, senior walks, historic walks,
and ciclovias. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.6:
Encourage major employment centers and employers to
promote commuting by bicycle including the use of flex-
time work schedules to support non -rush bicycle
commuting. Build a coalition with City, businesses,
schools, and residents to promote active transportation.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.7:
Encourage participation in bicycle and pedestrian
promotion activities by education facilities, arts programs,
active transportation clubs, and entertainment providers.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.8:
Achieve "Silver Level Bicycle Friendly Community' by
League of American Bicyclists by 2025. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.9:
Achieve "Walk Friendly Community" status from
WalkFriendly.org by 2025. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.10:
Achieve "HEAL City" designation by 2017. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Goal C-11:
Promote the Positive Air Quality, Health, and Economic Benefits of Active Transportation
Encourage active transportation by promoting air quality, health, and economic benefits, and by
pursuing multiple sources of funding for active transportation programs and facilities. [New Goal for
2015-2035 GP]
Improving the Environment with Active Transportation
Objective C -11A: Improve air quality and public health and reduce ambient noise by
promoting Active Transportation programs. [New Objective for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.1: Determine baseline emissions levels, then track and
communicate changes in emissions as modes of
transportation trips shift to encourage more walking and
biking. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.2: Improve the quality of life in Costa Mesa by reducing
neighborhood traffic and noise. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
2015-2035 (J,'N[ R AL PLAN
GOALS. OI3.IE(11\'ES AVD POLK INS
Recommendation C-11.3:
Recommendation C-11.4:
Economic and Other Incentives
P \GF: 29
Increase pedestrian and bicycle trips, thereby reducing
vehicle trips and vehicle miles Traveled. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Coordinate with appropriate federal, state, and county
health agencies on active transportation programs to
achieve health benefits. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C-11 B: Provide economic incentives for expanding and enhancing bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation CA 1.5: Incentivize the business community to support pedestrians
and bicycle users in tangible ways. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.6: Partner with the business and school communities to
create a marketing strategy to encourage individual
businesses to market Costa Mesa as a bicycle -friendly
City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.7: Encourage developers to include features, amenities and
programs that are proven to increase walking and/or
bicycling. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.8: Offer incentives for businesses whose employees walk or
bike to work. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.9: Encourage the Chamber of Commerce and the business
community to promote active transportation in commercial
areas to stimulate economic vitality. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Goal C-12:
Monitor, Evaluate, and Pursue Funding for Implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
[New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C -12A: Continuously monitor and evaluate Costa Mesa's implementation
progress on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan policies, programs,
and projects. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.1: Establish a monitoring program to measure the
effectiveness and benefits of the Costa Mesa Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.2: Track citywide trends in active transportation through the
use of Census data, bicycle and pedestrian counts, travel
surveys, and online surveys as part of annual reviews of
the General Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.3: Ensure that Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan programs
and projects are implemented in an equitable manner
geographically, socioeconomically, and serving
disadvantaged communities. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GO.VS,OBJEC-1I\FS AND POLICIES
Fund the Plans
PAGE 30
Objective C-126: Pursue grants and other sources of funding for bicycle and pedestrian
projects. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.4: Strategize use of resources on developing effective and
efficient grant application and program administration.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.5: Pursue multiple sources of funding and support efforts to
maintain or increase federal, state and local funding for
the implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.6: Consider designating a portion of development traffic
impact fees to fund bicycle and pedestrian facilities. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Growth Management Elements
The goals, objectives, and policies that address growth management are as follows:
Goal GM -1:
Inter -jurisdictional Coordination [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
PAGE 31
Objective GM -1A: Coordinate land use and transportation planning policies with State,
regional, and local growth management efforts. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
GM -1.1: Cooperate with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and other
jurisdictions on development, all future regional transportation plans, and land
use planning on a countywide basis. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM -1.2: Coordinate population, housing, and employment projections with the State
Department of Finance, Southern California Association of Governments, Center
for Demographic Research, Newport -Mesa Unified School District, and County of
Orange agencies in terms of infrastructure planning. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
GM -1.3: Work with inter -jurisdictional forums such as the City -County Coordinating
Committee to make sure that the City's fees are consistent with minimally
acceptable impact fees in the region. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM -1.4: Participate in inter -jurisdictional planning forums to discuss implementation of
traffic improvements, cooperative land use planning, and appropriate mitigation
measures for developments with multijurisdictional impacts. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
GM -1.5: Continue to require that any new large developments prepare a master plan and
environmental impact analysis. This allows the City to anticipate the impacts of
large projects prior to development of any portion and permits more time to plan
for public services and facilities needed to support the project. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Goal GM -2:
Integration of Land Use and Transportation Planning [2000 GP Goal GM -1 — Modified for 2015-2035
GPI
Objective GM -2A: Maintain the Level of Service standards by integration of land use and
transportation planning. [2000 GP Objective GM -1A — Modified for
2015-2035 GP]
GM -2.1: Ensure that land use designations are reflected in the sub -regional county
model and SCAG's model through consistent assumptions and methodologies.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM -2.2: Coordinate with State, county, and local agencies for planning and construction
of public utilities to minimize negative impacts on the circulation system. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM -2.3: Use the Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program to assess
the impact of existing and new development on the circulation system. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM -2.4: Support uses and development which create synergistic relationships with
neighboring uses and development, especially those whose addition does not
create mutually exclusive additional vehicular trips but adds to the value of the
destination by any potential visitor. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM -2.5: Support creative and flexible solutions that provide for additional economic or
physical growth within the City but does not place greater impact on the
circulation system. These would include shared parking agreements, offset hours
of operation, and clustering of harmonious and supportive uses. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GI-:\1�:RAL PLAN
GOA1S, OBJFCI'IN FS 01) POI R INS
Housing Element
P %(7l. 32
The goals and policies, from the adopted 2013-2021 Housing Element, that address housing are as
follows:
Goal HOU-1:
Preservation and Enhancement
Preserve the availability of existing housing opportunities and conserve as well as enhance the quality
of existing dwelling units and residential neighborhoods. [No Change]
HOU-1.1: Develop standard and/or guidelines for new development with emphasis on site
(including minimum site security lighting) and building design to minimize
vulnerability to criminal activity. [No Change]
HOU-1.2: Encourage existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including but not limited
to mobile home parks and manufactured home parks, from the encroachment of
incompatible or potentially disruptive land uses and/or activities. [No Change]
HOU-1.3: Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or abandoned vehicles,
outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal building and establish regulations to
abate weed -filled yards when any of the above is deemed to constitute a health,
safety or fire hazard. [No Change]
HOU-1.4: Establish code enforcement as a high priority and provide adequate funding and
staffing to support code enforcement programs. [No Change]
HOU-1.5: Install and upgrade public service facilities (streets, alleys, and utilities) to
encourage increased private market investments in declining or deteriorating
neighborhoods. [No Change]
HOU-1.6: Continue existing rehabilitation loan and grant programs for low and moderate -
income homeowners as long as funds are available. [No Change]
HOU-1.7: Minimize the displacement of existing residences due to public projects. [No
Change]
HOU-1.8: Encourage the development of housing that fulfills specialized needs. [No
Change]
Goal HOU-2:
Preserving and Expanding Affordable Housing Opportunities
Provide a range of housing choices for all social and economic segments of the community, including
housing for persons with special needs.
HOU-2.1: Encourage concurrent applications (i.e., rezones, tentative tract maps,
conditional use permits, variance request, etc.) if multiple approvals are required,
and if consistent with applicable processing requirements. [No Change]
HOU-2.2: Promote the use of State density bonus provisions to encourage the
development of affordable housing for lower and moderate income households,
as well as senior housing. [No Change]
2015-2035 GEMIRAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJE('I 1A ES .-SND POLICIES
P -AGI{ 33
HOU-2.3: Provide incentive bonus units to encourage the redevelopment of residential
units that are nonconforming in terms of density. The incentive shall be limited to
the multi -family residential land use designations. The density incentive shall be
limited to an increase of 25 percent above the Medium -Density or an increase of
50 percent above High -Density. In no case shall the resulting number of units
exceed the existing number of units on each site. [No Change]
HOU-2.4: Encourage developers to employ innovative or alternative construction methods
to reduce housing costs and increase housing supply. [No Change]
HOU-2.5: Continue membership in the Orange County Housing Authority to provide rental
assistance to very low income households. [No Change]
HOU-2.6: Provide clear rules, policies, and procedures, for reasonable accommodation in
order to promote equal access to housing. Policies and procedures should be
ministerial and include but not be limited to identifying who may request a
reasonable accommodation (i.e., persons with disabilities, family -members,
landlords, etc.), timeframes for decision-making, and provisions for relief from the
various land -use, zoning, or building regulations that ma constrain the housing
for persons of disabilities. [No Change]
HOU-2.7: Monitor the implementation of the City's ordinances, codes, policies, and
procedures to ensure they comply with the "reasonable accommodation" for
disable provisions and all fair housing laws. [No Change]
Goal HOU-3:
Provisions of Adequate Sites
Provide adequate, suitable sites for residential use and development or maintenance of a range of
housing that varies sufficiently in terms of cost, design, size, location, and tenure to meet the housing
needs of all segment of the community at a level that can be supported by infrastructure. [No Change]
HOU-3.1: Encourage the conversion of existing marginal or vacant motels, commercial,
and/or industrial land to residential, where feasible and consistent with
environmental conditions that are suitable for new residential development. [No
Change]
HOU-3.2: Provide opportunities for the development of well planned and designed project
which, through vertical or horizontal integration, provide for the development of
compatible residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or public uses within a
single project or neighborhood. [No Change]
HOU-3.3: Cooperate with large employers, the Chamber of Commerce, and major
commercial and industrial developers to identify and implement programs to
balance employment growth with the ability to provide housing opportunities
affordable to the incomes of the newly created job opportunities. [No Change]
HOU-3.4: Consider the potential impact on housing opportunities and existing residential
neighborhoods when reviewing rezone petitions affecting residential properties.
[No Change]
HOU-3.5: Encourage transit -oriented development along transportation corridors. [No
Change]
2015-2035 GENFRAL PLAN
GOALS.OBJECIIVES AND POLICIES
Goal HOU-4:
Equal Housing Opportunity
PAGE 34
Ensure that all existing and future housing opportunities are open and available to all social and
economic segments of the community without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex,
sexual orientation, disability/medical conditions, national origin or ancestry, marital status, age,
household composition or size, source of income, or any other arbitrary factors. [No Change]
HOU-4.1: Support the intent and spirit of equal housing opportunities as express in Federal
and State fair housing laws. [No Change]
HOU-4.2: Continue to provide fair housing and counseling services for all Costa Mesa
residents in an effort to remove barriers and promote access to affordable
housing in the City. [No Change]
HOU-4.3: Encourage programs that address the housing needs of senior citizens. [No
Change]
HOU-4.4: Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and preservation of
residential developments which will meet the needs of families and individuals
with specialized housing requirements. [No Change]
HOU-4.5: Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and preservation of
residential developments to meet the needs of the developmentally disabled. [No
Change]
Goal HOU-5:
Coordination and Cooperation
Coordinate local housing efforts with appropriate federal, state, regional, and local governments and/or
agencies and to cooperate in the implementation of intergovernmental housing programs to ensure
maximum effectiveness in solving local and regional housing problems. [No Change]
HOU-5.1: Investigate alternative intergovernmental arrangements and program options to
deal with area -wide housing issues and problems. [No Change]
2015-2035 GI,:NI- ,R VI, PLAN
P \GF: 35
Conservation Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address conservation are as follows:
Goal CON -1:
Preserved and Restored Natural Coastal Habitat and Landforms
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide residents with a high-quality environment through the
conservation of resources, including land, water, wildlife, and vegetation; and the protection of areas of
unique natural beauty. [2000 GP Goal CON -1]
Objective CON -1.A:
Evaluate existing biotic resources and preserve them in ecologically
viable and natural conditions, where possible; and/or restore and
integrate these resources into the urban environment, where feasible.
[2000 GP Objective CON -1A]
Habitat and Biological Resources Protection and Restoration
CON -1.A.1:
Natural habitat is essential to ensuring biodiversity and protecting sensitive
biological resources. Protect these areas and consult with the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife, Orange County Water District, Orange
County Parks, and other regional agencies to identify areas for special
protection, and establish appropriate protection measures for these areas.
[2000 GP Policy CON -1 A.1 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -1.A.2:
Contribute to regional biodiversity and the preservation of rare, unique, and
sensitive biological resources by maintaining functional wildlife corridors and
habitat linkages. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -1.A.3:
Coordinate with the United States Fish and Wildlife service, the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other regulatory agencies to mitigate
project impacts affecting open and natural spaces. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
CON -1.A.4:
Promote and protect native plant species within Fairview Park, and remove
and control the spread of invasive species, including plants, animals, and
fungi. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -1.A.5:
Ensure that all future development is reviewed with regard to protecting
natural topography and bluffs to preserve and enhance Costa Mesa's natural
beauty. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -1.A.6:
Minimize soil depletion and erosion in development projects. Prevent erosion
caused by construction activities, and encourage preservation of natural
vegetation and topography. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Access to Large -Scale
Natural Areas
CON -1.A.7:
Improve access to large-scale natural areas in the City. These areas should
be open for controlled access to improve public enjoyment. Access should
be limited where natural habitat is extremely sensitive. Work with transit
agencies to improve connections and access to open space and recreation
facilities from all Costa Mesa neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -1.A.8:
Require the provision of adequate visitor -serving on-site parking facilities
that do no impact sensitive resources within the Coastal Zone. [2000 GP
Policy CON -1 DA]
CON -1.A.9:
Coordinate the development of plans, policies, and design standards for
projects within the Coastal Zone with appropriate local, regional, and federal
agencies. [2000 GP Policy CON -1 D.51
2015-2035 (FNFRAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECT1� E'S :SND POLICIES
Goal CON -2:
Conserved Natural Resources through Environmental Sustainability
P \(J" 36
Reduce the City's carbon footprints and manage resources wisely to meet the needs of a growing
population and economy. Base community planning decisions on sustainable practices that reduce
environmental pollutants, conserve resources, and minimize waste. Encourage the design of energy-
efficient buildings, use renewable energy, and promote alternative methods of transportation. [2000 GP
Goal CON -1]
Objective CON -2.A: Work to conserve energy resources in existing and new buildings,
utilities, and infrastructure. [2000 GP Objective CON -1C]
Energy Efficiency and Conservation
CON -2.A.1: Promote efficient use of energy and conservation of available resources in
the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of public and private
facilities, infrastructure, and equipment. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -2.A.2: Consult with regional agencies and utility companies to pursue energy
efficiency goals. Expand renewable energy strategies to reach zero net
energy for both residential and commercial new construction. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CON -2.A.3: Continue to develop partnerships with participating jurisdictions to promote
energy efficiency, energy conservation, and renewable energy resource
development by leveraging the abilities of local governments to strengthen
and reinforce the capacity of energy efficiency efforts. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
CON -2.A.4: Encourage new development to take advantage of Costa Mesa's optimal
climate in the warming and cooling of buildings, including use of heating,
ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Green Building Sustainable Development Practices
CON -2.A.5: Promote environmentally sustainable development principles for buildings,
master planned communities, neighborhoods, and infrastructure. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -2.A.6: Encourage construction and building development practices that reduce
resource expenditures throughout the lifecycle of a structure. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CON -2.A.7: Continue to require all City facilities and services to incorporate energy and
resource conservation standards and practices and require that new
municipal facilities be built within the LEED Gold standards or equivalent.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -2.A.8: Continue City green initiatives in purchases of equipment, and agreements
that favor sustainable products and practices. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Solid Waste Reduction and Recycling
CON -2.A.9 Encourage waste management programs that promote waste reduction and
recycling to minimize materials sent to landfills. Maintain robust programs
encourage residents and businesses to reduce, reuse, recycle, and
compost. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GI('NF:R.AL PLAN
GOALS, 013J1{CLIA FS AND POLICIES
P \GL' 37
CON -2.A.10 Support waste management practices that provide recycling programs.
Promote organic recycling, landfill diversion, zero waste goals, proper
hazardous waste collections, composting, and the continuance of recycling
centers. [2000 GP Policy CON -1 B.4 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -2.A.11 Continue construction and demolition programs that require recycling and
minimize waste in haul trips. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CON -3:
Improved Water Supply and Quality
Pursue a multijurisdictional approach to protecting, maintaining, and improving water quality and the
overall health of the watershed. A comprehensive, integrated approach will ensure compliance with
federal and State standards, and will address a range of interconnected priorities, including water
quality and runoff; stormwater capture, storage, and flood management techniques that focus on natural
drainage; natural filtration and groundwater recharge through green infrastructure and habitat
restoration; and water recycling and conservation. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective CON -3.A: Work towards the protection and conservation of existing and future
water resources by recognizing water as a limited resource that requires
conservation. [2000 GP Objective CON -1 B]
Water Supply
CON -3.A.1: Continue to consult with local water districts and the Orange County Water
District to ensure reliable, adequate, and high-quality sources of water
supply at a reasonable cost. [2000 GP Policy CON -1 B.3 — Modified for 2015-
2035 GP]
Water Conservation
CON -3.A.2: Encourage residents, public facilities, businesses, and industry to minimize
water consumption, especially during drought years. [2000 GP Policy CON -
1 B.3 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -3.A.3: Restrict use of turf in new construction and landscape reinstallation that
requires high irrigation demands, except for area parks and schools, and
encourage the use of drought -tolerant landscaping. [2000 GP Policy 1A.2 —
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Water Recycling
CON -3.A.4: Consult with local water districts and the Orange County Water District to
advance water recycling program for new and existing developments,
including the use of treated wastewater to irrigate parks, golf courses,
roadway landscaping, and other intensive irrigation consumers. [2000 GP
Policy CON -1 B.2 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Water Quality and Urban Runoff
CON -3.A.5: Work with public and private property owners to reduce stormwater runoff in
urban areas to protect water quality in storm drainage channels, the Santa
Ana River, and other local water courses that lead to the Pacific Ocean.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -3.A.6: Continue to develop strategies to promote stormwater management
techniques and storm drain diversion programs that collectively and naturally
filter urban runoff. [2000 GP Policy CON -1 E.5 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -3.A.7: Continue to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Program (NPDES) by participating in the Countywide Drainage Area
Management Plan (DAMP), which stipulates water quality requirements for
minimizing urban runoff and discharge from new development and requires
2II15-2035 (JAVR.U. PLAN
GOALS, (HUF('I IN Els AND POLK It -:s
P ACL: 38
the provisions of applicable Best Management Practices (BMP). [2000 GP
Policy CON -1A.3]
CON -3.A.8: Require that all applicable development projects be reviewed with regards to
requirements of both the on-site Water Quality Management Plan and State
requirements for runoff and obtaining a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) permit. [2000 GP Policy CON -1 E.6 — Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
Municipal Sewer System
CON -3.A.9: Continue to consult with the Costa Mesa Sanitation District and the Orange
County Sanitation District to modernize wastewater treatment facilities to
avoid overflows of untreated sewage. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CON -4:
Improved Air Quality
Take steps to improve and maintain air quality for the benefit of the health and vitality of residents and
the local economy. In alignment with State emissions reduction goals and in cooperation with the South
Coast Air Quality Management District, pursue regional collaboration to reduce emissions from all
sources. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective CON -4.A: Pursue the prevention of the significant deterioration of local and
regional air quality. [2000 GP Objective CON -1 E]
Air Quality
CON -4.A.1: Support regional policies and efforts that improve air quality to protect
human and environmental health, and minimize disproportionate impacts on
sensitive population groups. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -4.A.2: Encourage businesses, industries and residents to reduce the impact of
direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of stationary and non -stationary
pollution sources. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -4.A.3: Require that sensitive uses such as schools, childcare centers, parks and
playgrounds, housing, and community gathering places are protected from
adverse impacts of emissions. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -4.A.4: Continue to participate in regional planning efforts with the Southern
California Association of Governments, nearby jurisdictions, and the South
Coast Air Quality Management District to meet or exceed air quality
standards. [2000 GP Policy CON -1 E.1]
Climate Change
CON -4.A.5: Encourage compact development, infill development, and a mix of uses that
are in proximity to transit, pedestrian, and bicycling infrastructures. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -4.A.6: Enhance bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support public bus
service, pursuant to the Circulation Element's goals, objectives, and policies.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -4.A.7: Encourage installation of renewable energy devices for businesses and
facilities and strive to reduce community -wide energy consumption. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON -4.A.8: Develop long-term, community -wide strategies and programs that work at
the local level to reduce greenhouse gases and Costa Mesa's "carbon
footprint". [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
201;-2035 (;1 -NVR AL PLAN
GO.US. 01.1H A I\ Es AVD 1101A IVB
Noise Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address noise are as follows:
Goal N-1:
Noise Hazards and Conditions
P VA' 39
The City of Costa Mesa aims to protect residents, local workers, and property from injury, damage, or
destruction from noise hazards and to work toward improved noise abatement. [2000 GP Goal N-1]
Objective N -1A: Control noise levels within the City for the protection of residential
areas, park areas, and other sensitive land uses from excessive and
unhealthful noise. [2000 GP Objective N-1 A]
N-1.1: Enforce the maximum acceptable exterior noise levels for residential areas at 65
CNEL. [2000 GP Policy N -1A.21
N-1.2: Give full consideration to the existing and projected noise environment when
considering alterations to the City's circulation system and Master Plan of
Highways. [2000 GP Policy N -1A.3]
N-1.3: Encourage Caltrans to construct noise attenuation barriers along 1-405, SR -55,
and SR -73 where these freeways adjoin residential and other noise -sensitive
areas. [2000 GP Policy N -1A.4]
N-1.4: Ensure that appropriate site design measures are incorporated into residential
developments, when required by an acoustical study, to obtain appropriate
exterior and interior noise levels.
When necessary, require field testing at the time of project completion to
demonstrate compliance. [2000 GP Policy N -1A.5]
N-1.5: Apply the standards contained in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations
as applicable to the construction of all new dwelling units. [2000 GP Policy CON -
1 C.2 and Policy N-1 A.6]
N-1.6: Discourage sensitive land uses from locating within the 65 CNEL noise contour
of John Wayne Airport. Should it be deemed by the City as appropriate and/or
necessary for a sensitive land use to locate in the 65 CNEL noise contour,
ensure that appropriate interior noise levels are met and that minimal outdoor
activities are allowed. [2000 GP Policy N -1A.71
N-1.7: Support alternative methods for the reduction of noise impacts at John Wayne
Airport while continuing to maintain safety and existing limitations on aircraft daily
departures. [2000 GP Policy N -1A.8]
N-1.8: Monitor the noise levels at OC Fair and Event Center and the Pacific
Amphitheater, and continue to monitor the status of legally binding noise levels
on the OC Fair and the Event Center and the Pacific Amphitheater. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GFAI:R.AL PLAN
GO AI.S, OR.IF:C'"I 1GES ,AVD VOLK IFS
Goal N-2:
Noise and Land Use Compatibility
PAGE -40
Integrate the known impacts of excessive noise on aspects of land use planning and siting of residential
and non-residential projects. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective N -2A: Plan for the reduction in noise impacts on sensitive receptors and land
uses. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
N-2.1: Require the use of sound walls, berms, interior noise insulation, double -paned
windows, and other noise mitigation measures, as appropriate, in the design of
new residential or other new noise sensitive land uses that are adjacent to
arterials, freeways, or adjacent to industrial or commercial uses. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
N-2.2: Require, as a part of the environmental review process, that full consideration be
given to the existing and projected noise environment. [2000 GP Policy N -1A.1]
N-2.3: Consider alternative noise level standards for mixed-use projects that take into
consideration the interaction of industrial operation noise impacts and the mixed-
use developments planned for the Westside and SoBeca. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
N-2.4: Require that all proposed projects are compatible with adopted noise/land use
compatibility criteria. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
N-2.5: Enforce applicable interior and exterior noise standards. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
N-2.6: Allow a higher exterior noise level standard for infill projects in existing residential
areas adjacent to major arterials if it can be shown that there are no feasible
mechanisms to meet the exterior noise levels. The interior standard of 45 dBA
CNEL shall be enforced for any new residential project. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
N-2.7: Encourage effective site planning in mixed-use areas that provides the optimal
distance between source of excessive sound and residents. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
N-2.8: Require new mixed-use developments to site loading areas, parking lots,
driveways, trash enclosures, mechanical equipment, and other noise sources
away from the residential portion of the development and adjacent established
residential development. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
N-2.9: Limit hours and/or require attenuation of commercial/entertainment operations
adjacent to residential and other noise sensitive uses in order to minimize
excessive noise to these receptors. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-21135 (:F_NF RAI. M, AN
(Y) 1LS, OK.IF:( 'I I\ E-41 kND 1101.1( IF:S
P;VA,. 41
Safety Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address safety are as follows:
Goal S-1:
Risk Management of Natural and Human -Caused Disasters
Minimize the risk of injury, loss of life, property damage, and environmental degradation from seismic
activity, geologic hazards, flooding, fire, and hazardous materials. Promote a sustainable approach to
reduce impacts of natural disasters, such as flooding and fire. [2000 GP Goal SAF -11
Objective S -1A: Work to mitigate and prevent potential adverse consequences of natural
and human -caused disasters. [2000 GP Objective SAF -1 A]
Geologic and Seismic Safety
S-1.1: Continue to incorporate geotechnical hazard data into future land use decision-
making, site design, and construction standards. [2000 GP Policy SAF -1A.1]
S-1.2: Enforce standards, review criteria, and ensure that structures on or adjacent to
bluffs are set back sufficiently to preserve the natural contours and aesthetic
value of the bluff line and to provide sufficient access for fire protection. [2000 GP
Policy SAF -1A.2]
S-1.3: Require geologic surveys of all new development located on or adjacent to bluffs.
[2000 GP Policy SAF -1A.3]
S-1.4: Encourage retrofitting of structures—particularly older buildings—to withstand
earthquake shaking and landslides consistent with State and historical building
codes. [2000 GP Policy SAF -1A.6 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.5: Enforce applicable building codes relating to the seismic design of structures to
reduce the potential for loss of life and property damage. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
S-1.6: Identify through a study the issue of unreinforced masonry buildings and soft
stories and other structures not meeting earthquake standards in Costa Mesa.
Provide assistance if necessary to unreinforced masonry building owners once
those buildings have been identified. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Liquefaction and Landslides
S-1.7: Continue to implement the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act, which requires sites
within liquefaction hazard areas to be investigated for liquefaction susceptibility
prior to building construction or human occupancy. [2000 GP Policy SAF -1A.5 –
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.8: Consider site soils conditions when reviewing projects in areas subject to
liquefaction or slope instability. [2000 GP Policy SAF -1A.4 – Modified for 2015-
2035 GP]
Localized Flooding
S-1.9: Continue to consult with appropriate local, State, and federal agencies to
maintain the most current flood hazard and floodplain information; use the
information as a basis for project review and to guide development in accordance
with federal, State, and local standards. [2000 GP Policy SAF -1A.8 – Modified for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GO.kLs. OBJE,C] 1\ FS :WD POLICIVIS
PAGE 42
S-1.10: Regularly review and update Article 10 - Floodway and Floodplain Districts of the
City's Municipal Code consistent with federal and State requirements. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.11: Improve and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure in a manner that
reduces flood hazards. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.12: Continue to develop hazard preparedness plans to prepare for large storms that
could bring flooding hazards and other related issues. [2000 GP Policy SAF -1A.8
— Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.13: Actively promote public education, research, and information dissemination on
flooding hazards. [2000 GP Policy SAF -1 A.8 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Tsunami and Sea Level Rise
S-1.14: Minimize flood hazard risks to people, property, and the environment by
addressing potential damage tsunamis and sea level rise. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
S-1.15: Consult with regional agencies and study strategies that employ engineering
defensive methods along the Santa Ana River that limit potential flooding
hazards from sea level rise. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Dam Inundation
S-1.16: Develop emergency response, early warning notification, and evacuation plans
for areas that are within dam inundation areas, where feasible. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Aviation Safety and Protection
S-1.17: Utilize the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) as a planning
resource for evaluation of land use compatibility and land use intensity in areas
affected by airport operations. In particular, future land use decisions within the
Safety/Runway Protection Zone will be evaluated in light of the risk to life and
property associated with aircraft operations. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.18: Comply with Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) and the John Wayne AELUP
requirements relative to Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
S-1.19: Use the Federal Aviation Regulations as a guideline to establish the ultimate
height of structures as defined in FAR Part 77. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.20: Minimize hazards to aeronautical operations by ensuring land uses do not emit
excessive glare, light, steam, smoke, dust, or electronic interference in
compliance with FAR regulations and the John Wayne AELUP. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GO.% .S. OBJEC I I\ ES kND POLL IIS
Goal S-2:
High Level of Police and Fire Services and Emergency Preparedness
P kGE 43
Provide a high level of security in the community to prevent and reduce crime, and to minimize risks of
fire to people, property, and the environment. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective S -2A: Plan, promote, and demonstrate a readiness to respond and reduce
threats to life and property through traditional and innovative emergency
services and programs. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Crime Prevention and Response
S-2.1: Promote crime prevention strategies and provide a high level of response to
incidents. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.2: Emphasize and prioritize crime prevention strategies, such as pedestrian -scale
lighting in targeted areas. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.3: Timely response to incidents and monitoring areas with high crime rates should
be part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce crime in the community. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Police and Fire Level of Service
S-2.4: Provide a high level of police and fire service in the community. Secure adequate
facilities, equipment, and personnel for police and fire. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
S-2.5: Consult with neighboring jurisdictions and partner agencies to respond
appropriately to emergencies and incidents in all parts of the City. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
S-2.6: Require that water supply systems for development are adequate to combat
structural fires in terms of location and minimum required fire -flow pressures.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.7: Require development to contribute its fair share toward funding the provision of
appropriate fire and emergency medical services as determined necessary to
adequately serve the project. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Fire and Medical Servicers
S-2.8: Regularly update regulations that will protect the community from fire hazards.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.9: Emphasize prevention and awareness of fire safety guidelines to minimize risk
and potential damage to life, property, and the environment. In areas designated
by the Costa Mesa Fire Department as having a high fire hazard, ensure
adequate fire equipment, personnel, firebreaks, facilities, water, and access for a
quick and efficient response in any area. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Emergency and Disaster Preparedness
S-2.10: Maintain staff and facilities that will continue to support a coordinated and
effective response to emergencies and natural disasters throughout the City.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.11: Consult with neighboring jurisdictions, local employers, and industries to ensure
that emergency preparedness and disaster response programs equitably serve
all parts of the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GI-:NI!R.U, PLAY
GOAL", OBA"( 1 I\ Es 01) POLICIES
P VGE: 44
S-2.12: Continue to maintain adequate police and fire staffing, facilities, equipment, and
maintenance sufficient to protect the community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Hazardous Materials Operations
S-2.13: Continue to consult with the County of Orange in the implementation of the
Orange County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. [2000 GP Policy SAF -
1B.11
S-2.14: Ensure that appropriate in-depth environmental analysis is conducted for any
proposed hazardous waste materials treatment, transfer, and/or disposal facility.
[2000 GP Policy SAF -1 B.21
S-2.15: Continue to consult with the County of Orange to identify and inventory all users
of hazardous materials and all hazardous waste generators, and prepare clean-
up action plans for identified disposal sites. [2000 GP Policy SAF -1 B.3]
S-2.16: Require the safe production, transportation, handling, use, and disposal of
hazardous materials that may cause air, water, or soil contamination. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.17: Encourage best practices in hazardous waste management, and ensure
consistency with City, County, and federal guidelines, standards, and
requirements. [2000 GP Policy SAF -1 B.1 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.18: Consult with federal, State, and local agencies and law enforcement to prevent
the illegal transportation and disposal of hazardous waste. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
2015-21135 (;ENF R AI. ITAN
P kGI•: 45
Community Design Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address community design are as follows:
PUBLIC REALM FOCUS
Goal CD -1:
Vehicular and Pedestrian Corridors
Strengthen the image of the City as experienced from sidewalks and roadways. [2000 GP Goal CD -1]
Objective CD -1A: Contribute to City beautification by enhancing the visual environment of
Costa Mesa's vehicular and pedestrian paths and corridors. [2000 GP
Objective CD -1A]
CD -1.1 Implement the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development
Guidelines in all new streetscape corridor and parkway projects. Coordinate with
new development adjacent to public rights -of -ways to integrate landscape
features and design elements consistent with the streetscape standards and
recommendations. [2000 GP Policy CD -1A.1]
CD -1.2 Coordinate street furniture elements (benches, bus shelters, newspaper racks,
trash receptacles, kiosks, etc.) whenever possible. Develop design standards
and guidelines for the street furniture within and adjacent to public rights-of-way
to complement the specific recommendations provided for streets in the City of
Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CD -1.3 Promote treatments for walls and fences and utility cabinets along public rights-
of-way that contribute to an attractive street and sidewalk environment. Require
that new walls and fences complement the style and character of the local district
and adjacent buildings. Newly constructed or reconstructed walls and fences
adjacent to sidewalks and roadways should incorporate architectural treatments
such as pilasters, masonry, or wrought iron, and should integrate tiered plantings
to soften their appearance. [2000 GP Policy CD -1A.3 — Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
CD -1.4 Promote a consistent landscape character along City streets to reinforce the
unique qualities of each corridor and district, including the development of
landscaped medians. Support implementation of the recommended street tree
palette for each City street, as identified in the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape
and Median Development Guidelines. [2000 GP Policy CD -1A.4]
CD -1.5 Encourage electric and communication lines to be placed underground and
electrical substations and telephone facilities to be screened to minimize visual
impacts from sidewalks, streets, and adjacent properties. Support utility
undergrounding through conditions of project approval, preparation of
undergrounding plans, and the formation of assessment districts. [2000 GP
Policy CD -1A.5]
Objective CD -1 B: Encourage clear connections between districts within the City. [2000 GP
Objective CD -1 B]
CD -1.6 Promote linkages between separate districts using bike trails, pedestrian paths,
common medians or parkway landscaping, and other location -appropriate
physical improvements. Through conditions of approval, public improvement
projects, and other measures, support development of new connections and the
enhancement of existing connections between districts. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
2015-2035 GFNFRAI. PI -.%N
GOALS, OBJF.0 IN FS AND POLICIES
Goal CD -2:
Cohesive and Identifiable Districts
P kG F 46
Enhance the existing character and strengthen the identity of Costa Mesa's districts. [2000 GP Goal
CD -2]
Objective CD -2A: Encourage future development and redevelopment to reinforce district
scale, identity, and urban form. [2000 GP Objective CD -2]
CD -2.1 Consider urban design guidelines for each identified district in Costa Mesa that
recognizes, maintains, and enhances the character and identity of each district;
integrate existing specific plans' policies and design guidelines as applicable.
[2000 GP Policy CD -2.1 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -2.2 Support and seek land uses and development that correspond or enrich our
existing districts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CD -3:
High Quality and Visually Interesting Nodes
Heighten the design quality and visual interest of nodes within Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Goal CD -3]
Objective CD -3A: Create a sense of arrival to Costa Mesa, and develop prominent
community focal points at key nodes within the City. [2000 GP Objective
CD -3]
CD -3.1 Introduce entry monument signs at key gateway locations, as identified in Figure
CD -4. Utilize the standard design specifications for entry signs included in the
City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines. [2000 GP
Policy CD -3.1]
CD -3.2 Reinforce a sense of arrival into the City by promoting architecturally significant
development and significant landscape plantings at key nodes. Undertake a
visioning process to develop specific design guidelines that articulate the desired
character for each node within Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Policy CD -3.21
CD -3.3 Design and development of entry and internal wayfinding signage to be located
throughout the City in areas that correspond to the existing nodes and districts.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CD -4:
Identifiable and Protected City Landmarks. [2000 GP Goal CD -41
Objective CD -4A: Promote the maintenance, use, and improvement of landmarks to
enhance the visual image and identity of Costa Mesa. [2000 GP
Objective CD -4]
CD -4.1 Support efforts to introduce new monuments and landmarks, and preserve,
maintain, and improve the condition of Costa Mesa landmarks. [2000 GP Policy
CD -4.1]
2015-203; GENERAL PLAN
GOALS. OB.IEC"I'I\ ES AND POLICIES
Goal CD -5:
P k(J' 47
Edges
Utilize Costa Mesa's edges as opportunities to enhance the City's image along its boundaries. [2000
GP Goal CD -5]
Objective CD -5A: Develop and implement programs that preserve and enhance City
edges. [2000 GP Objective CD -51
CD -5.1 Preserve and optimize natural views and open spaces in Costa Mesa. [2000 GP
Policy CD -5.1]
CD -5.2 Control the visual impacts of new development on natural views of the coast and
the wetlands. [2000 GP Policy CD -5.2]
CD -5.3 Develop open space corridors and trails along the edges of Costa Mesa where
feasible and connect these trails to existing and potential future trails throughout
the City. [2000 GP Policy CD -5.3]
CD -5.4 Continue to preserve natural open space, including restoration of the natural
areas of Talbert Regional Park. [2000 GP Policy CD -5.41
CD -5.5 Continue protection of Fairview Park as an open space and recreation area.
[2000 GP Policy CD -5.5]
CD -5.6 Continue to work with Caltrans to improve the design quality of freeway edges.
[2000 GP Policy CD -5.6]
PRIVATE PROPERTY FOCUS
Goal CD -6:
Image
Enhance opportunities for new development and redevelopment to contribute to a positive visual image
for the City of Costa Mesa that is consistent with the district image. [2000 GP Goal CD -6]
Objective CD -6A: Establish development policies and design guidelines that create an
aesthetically pleasing and functional environment. [2000 GP Objective
CD -6]
CD -6.1 Encourage the inclusion of public art and attractive, functional architecture into
new development that will have the effect of promoting Costa Mesa as the "City
of the Arts". [2000 GP Policy CD -6.1 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -6.2 Encourage the use of creative and well-designed signs that establish a distinctive
image for the City. [2000 GP Policy CD -6.2 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -6.3 Continue to work with Code Enforcement to ensure continued maintenance of
properties and compliance with adopted development standards. [2000 GP
Policy CD -6.31
Goal CD -7:
Quality Residential
Promote and protect the unique identity of Costa Mesa's residential neighborhoods. [2000 GP Goal CD -7]
Objective CD -7A: Encourage excellence in architectural design. [2000 GP Objective CD -
7A]
CD -7.1 Ensure that new and remodeled structures are designed in architectural styles
that reflect the City's eclectic quality, yet are compatible in scale and character
with existing buildings and the natural surroundings within residential
neighborhoods. Continue to update and maintain the Costa Mesa Residential
Guidelines. [2000 GP Policy CD -7.1]
2015-2113 GENERAL PLAN
GO,AI.S. 011JECfI\ ES .AND POLICIL:S
P kGI•: 48
CD -7.2 Preserve the character and scale of Costa Mesa's established residential
neighborhoods where possible; when new residential development is proposed,
encourage that the new structures are consistent with the prevailing character of
existing development in the immediate vicinity, and that new development does
not have a substantial adverse impact on adjacent areas. [2000 GP Policy CD -
7.2]
Objective CD -76: Encourage the use of native plant palettes in the creation of landscaping
plans used to establish a sense of place in neighborhood identification
efforts. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -7.3 Ensure that California native plants are used to support the local ecology and
save water. Develop landscaping guidelines that reflect the local community.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CD -8:
Quality Commercial Development
Achieve a high level of design quality for commercial development. [2000 GP Goal CD -8]
Objective CD -8A: Encourage a high level of architectural and site design quality. [2000 GP
Objective CD -8A]
CD -8.1 Require that new and remodeled commercial development be designed to reflect
architectural diversity, yet be compatible with the scale and character of the
district. [2000 GP Policy CD -8A.1 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -8.2 Use distinctive commercial architectural styles to reinforce a positive sense of
place. Commercial architectural design elements and materials must be of high
quality and style as well as suitable for long-term maintenance. Consistent
architectural design should be considered in choosing materials, finishes,
decorative details, color, accent features and include the following elements and
materials appropriate for their context (see Table CD -3: Elements and
Materials): [2000 GP Policy CD -8A.2 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Table CD -3: Elements and Materials
• Simple, multi -planed pitched roofs
• Open rafters/tails with large overhangs
• Appearance of "thick" walls
• Courtyards, arcades, and intimate spaces
• Tile details
• Deep-set window and door openings
• Offset wall planes
• Fountains and other unique details
• Building masses with the incorporation of
one and two story architecture
• Sequencing of enclosed space/arches
• Stucco, smooth, sand or light lace
finish
• Wood, as an exposed structural
material
• Clay or concrete roof tiles
• Native fieldstone
• Wood window casements
• Wood, as an accent material
• Brick, as an accent material
• Wrought iron (rust proof; anodized
aluminum)
• Tile, as an accent material
• Slumpstone garden walls
CD -8.3 Encourage the use of entrance patios, courtyards, plazas, arcades, fountains,
porches, tower elements, covered walks, and other features in commercial areas.
Promote pedestrian amenities. [2000 GP Policy CD -8A.3]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 49
CD -8.4 Ensure that common areas, walkways, driveways, and parking spaces be
landscaped consistent with landscaping standards contained in the Planning,
Zoning, and Development Code. Utilize landscaping to provide project amenities
for new and remodeled commercial uses, and to screen parking and equipment
areas. Landscaped areas generally should incorporate planting utilizing a three -
tiered system: 1) grasses and ground covers, 2) shrubs and vines, and 3) trees.
[2000 GP Policy CD -8A.4 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -8.5 Ensure that site access, parking, and circulation for commercial uses are
designed in a logical, safe manner. Parking should not dominate the site in areas
adjacent to street, and should be well landscaped with a clear hierarchy of
circulation. Wherever possible, parking lots should be divided into a series of
connected smaller lots utilizing walkways and raised landscape strips. Parking
lots should also include landscaping that accents the importance of driveways
from the street, frames the major circulation aisles, and highlights pedestrian
pathways. [2000 GP Policy CD -8A.5 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -8.6 Require that areas for outside equipment, trash receptacles, storage, and loading
areas be located in the least conspicuous part of the site. Utility and mechanical
equipment (e.g. electric and gas meters, electrical panels, and junction boxes)
should be concealed from view from public streets, neighboring properties, and
nearby higher buildings. Trash enclosures should be architecturally compatible
with the project. Landscaping should be incorporated into the design of trash
enclosures to deter graffiti. [2000 GP Policy CD -8A.6 — Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
CD -8.7 Encourage decorative paving treatments to be incorporated throughout
commercial developments, including driveway entries, pedestrian walkways,
plazas, and other areas. The design, materials, and colors of decorative paving
treatments (e.g., stamped concrete, stone, brick or granite pavers, exposed
aggregate, or colored concrete) should complement the architectural style of the
primary buildings and make a positive contribution to the aesthetic and function
of the site. [2000 GP Policy CD -8A.7 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -8.8 Require that exterior lighting on commercial properties be consistent with the
architectural style of the commercial building. On each commercial site, all
lighting fixtures should be from the same family of fixtures with respect to design,
materials, color, fixture, and color of light. Lighting sources should be shielded,
diffused or indirect to avoid spillover on adjacent properties, nighttime sky light
pollution, and glare to pedestrians and motorists. To minimize the total number of
freestanding light standards, wall -mounted and pathway lights should be utilized
to the greatest extent possible. [2000 GP Policy CD -8A.81
Objective CD -86: Preserve the scale and character of established neighborhoods near
commercial uses. [2000 GP Objective CD -8B]
CD -8.9 Ensure that new commercial development utilize site planning and design
features that optimize compatibility with adjacent residential neighborhoods. The
following guidance should be considered:
When adjacent residential and nonresidential uses can mutually benefit from
connection, appropriate linkages (e.g., walkways, common landscape areas,
and building orientation) are encouraged. Successful interaction between
commercial and residential uses may be achieved through adequate
setbacks, landscape buffers, screening, decorative masonry walls, berms,
building orientation, and limitations of commercial activities.
Loading areas, access and circulation driveways, trash and storage areas,
and rooftop equipment should be located as far as possible from adjacent
residences.
Building orientation and landscaping of commercial buildings should
minimize direct lines of sight into adjacent residential private open space.
[2000 GP Policy CD -8B.1]
015-1113: GEVI{Il.AI. PL:AS
60.11.5.0BliE('II \ E S VN I)P01,1(IFN
Goal CD -9:
Mixed Use
PAGE 50
Promote development of mixed-use projects that seamlessly integrate multiple uses both functionally
and aesthetically. [2000 GP Goal CD -9]
Objective CD -9A: Design mixed use development projects to achieve a high quality
character. [2000 GP Objective CD -9A]
CD -9.1 Require that mixed-use development projects be designed to mitigate potential
conflicts between uses. Consider noise, lighting, and security. [2000 GP Policy
CD -9A.1]
CD -9.2 Provide adequate parking, open space and recreational facilities to serve
residents in mixed-use development projects. Design parking and other areas to
acknowledge different users (residents versus shoppers) and to be compatible
with the architectural character of the building(s). [2000 GP Policy CD -9A.2]
Objective CD -913: Provide for the development of projects that integrate housing with
commercial uses and other compatible uses. [2000 GP Objective CD -
9B]
CD -9.3 Encourage mixed-use development along the east side of Newport Boulevard
between Mesa Drive and Walnut Street. Establish incentives for the development
of projects in planned development zones that integrate housing with retail and
office uses. [2000 GP Policy CD -913.11
CD -9.4 Encourage the development of mixed-use urban villages along specified areas of
West 17th Street, West 19th Street, and Superior Avenue that integrates
residential with office, retail, business services, personal services, public spaces
and uses, and other community amenities in a single building (vertical mixed-use
development) or in proximity on the same site (horizontal mixed-use
development). [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -9.5 Promote new types of urban housing that could be target -marketed to people
seeking alternative housing choices in proximity to a major commercial area.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -9.6 Support efforts to mix compatible uses and activities. Encourage the siting of
community -oriented services, businesses, and amenities in and near mixed-use
neighborhoods, including schools, libraries, open space, and parks. [2000 GP
Policy CD -913.2]
Goal CD -10:
Industrial and Business Parks
Promote quality design approaches for the redevelopment of existing industrial buildings, encourage the
design to incorporate or provide flexibility for the needs of emerging types of industrial uses, and strive
to match design with overall character of nodes, corridors, or districts if applicable. [2000 GP Goal CD -
10 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective CD -10A: Require that industrial and business park projects meet high-quality
design standards. [2000 GP Policy CD -10A]
2015-203: GENER.U. PLAN
GO.AI.S, O13JIJ'I f� E.S VND POLICIES
PDGF. Sl
CD -10.1 Require that industrial projects be designed to convey visual interest and a
positive image. Architectural qualities and design elements encouraged for
industrial uses are:
• Building modulation indentations and architectural details
• Building entry accentuation
• Screening of equipment and storage areas
• Landscaping to soften building exteriors and to serve as a buffer between
uses [2000 GP Policy CD -10A.1]
CD -10.2 Encourage that the design of industrial buildings considers the visual and
physical relationship to adjacent uses. An industrial structure which dominates its
surrounding environment by its relative size shall generally be discouraged.
[2000 GP Policy CD -10A.2]
CD -10.3 Encourage adaptive reuse of existing industrial structures which results in
rehabilitated buildings with distinctive and attractive architecture. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CD -10.4 Promote the use of materials and colors that produce diversity and visual interest
in industrial buildings. The use of various siding materials (i.e., masonry,
concrete texturing, cement, or plaster) can produce effects of texture and relief
that provide architectural interest. [2000 GP Policy CD -10A.3]
CD -10.5 Require that landscaping be used to define areas such as entrances to industrial
buildings and parking lots; define the edges of developments; provide transition
between neighboring properties; and provide screening for outdoor storage,
loading, and equipment areas. Landscaping should be in scale with adjacent
buildings and be of an appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended
purpose. [2000 GP Policy CD -10A.4]
CD -10.6 Require that the design of lighting fixtures and their structural support be of a
scale and architectural design compatible with on-site industrial buildings. Large
areas should be illuminated to minimize the visual impact and amount of spillover
light onto surrounding projects. [2000 GP Policy CD -10A.5]
Objective CD -10B: Ensure that the development of industrial projects are positive additions
to the City's community setting and do not result in adverse impacts with
adjacent uses. [2000 GP Objective CD -10B]
CD -10.7 Require industrial projects to incorporate landscape setbacks, screening walls,
and/or other elements that mitigate negative impacts with adjacent uses. [2000
GP Policy CD -10B.11
CD -10.8 Protect transitional areas between industrial and other uses. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CD -10.9 Storage yards, parking areas, and service areas should be screened from public
view. [2000 GP Policy CD -108.2]
Goal CD -11:
Attractive Signs that Reflect Costa Mesa
Ensure that signs contribute positively to Costa Mesa's image and overall economic development.
[2000 GP Goal CD -13]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGF: 5'
Objective CD -11A: Facilitate the installation of signs that contribute to a positive image of
the public realm. [2000 GP Objective CD -13]
CD -11.1 Encourage homeowners' associations and neighborhoods to maintain housing
tract entrance signs in an attractive condition, and encourage the placement of
such signs at the entrance of major developments which do not have such
identification. [2000 GP Policy CD -13.1]
CD -11.2 Encourage the use of common design elements in signs for commercial and
industrial centers through the development of planned sign programs to improve
center identity by publicizing the benefits of such programs to developers and
local business operators. [2000 GP Policy CD -13.2]
CD -11.3 Encourage citywide sign design guidelines that promote creativity and flexibility
while upholding design quality. Design guidelines could include the design and
placement of business signs, public street graphics, street signs, locational and
directional signs, traffic signs, etc. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CD -11.4 Introduce distinctive entry signage within the Costa Mesa Streetscape and
Median Development Guidelines which effectively announces arrival to unique
districts and neighborhoods. [2000 GP Policy CD -13.3 — Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
CD -11.5 Develop and design signage that helps with way -finding throughout the City so
visitors and residents can easily access destination locations and identify
landmarks. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CD -12:
Public Safety through Design
Use design approaches to enhance public safety. [2000 GP Goal CD -14 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective CD -12A: Incorporate public safety considerations into community design. [2000
GP Objective CD -14]
CD -12.1 Decrease the opportunity for criminal activity by addressing high-risk
circumstances (e.g., dark alleys, enclosed stairwells, and dark entrances).
Involve the Police and Fire Departments in reviewing and making design
recommendations during the project review process. [2000 GP Policy CD -14.1]
CD -12.2 Continue to implement and refine development standards and/or guidelines
based on Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) for new
development and redevelopment with emphasis on site and building design to
minimize vulnerability to criminal activity. [2000 GP Policy CD -14.2]
CD -12.3 Continue to provide CPTED training to City staff and local planning and design
professionals to optimize public safety through community design. [2000 GP
Policy CD -14.3]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Open Space and Recreation Element
PAGF 53
The goals, objectives, and policies that address open space and recreation are as follows:
Goal OSR-1:
Balanced and Accessible System of Parks and Open Spaces
Provide a high-quality environment through the development of recreation resources and preservation
of open space that meets community needs in Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Goal OSR-1]
Objective OSR-1A: Maintain and preserve existing parks, and strive to provide additional
parks, public spaces, and recreation facilities that meet the community's
evolving needs. [2000 GP Objective OSR-1A]
Adequate Neighborhood and Community Park Recreational Facilities
OSR-1.1: Maintain a system of Neighborhood and Community Parks that provide a variety
of active and passive recreational opportunities throughout the City. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.2: Provide parks and recreation facilities appropriate for the individual
neighborhoods in which they are located and reflective of the needs and interests
of the population they serve. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Acquisition of New Parkland
OSR-1.3: Pursue the acquisition and development of pocket and neighborhood parks
within park -deficient areas, as identified in Figure OSR-3: Planning Areas and
Underserved Park Areas. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.3 — Modified for 2105-2035
GP]
OSR-1.4: Prioritize the acquisition of land for parks in underserved neighborhoods. [2000
GP Policy OSR-1A.14 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.5: Maximize public space by requiring plazas and public gathering spaces in private
developments that can serve multiple uses, including recreation and social
needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.6: Provide maximum visibility and accessibility for future public parks by locating
facilities in close proximity to public streets. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.2]
OSR-1.7: Adjust and update development fee programs to accumulate funds for the
acquisition and improvement of parks and recreation facilities commensurate
with identified need and population growth. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Balance of Passive and Active Recreation
OSR-1.8: Require that parks and recreation facilities reflect new trends and population
changes, and are developed with facilities appropriate to all ages, including
athletic fields, active play areas, passive open space, tot lots, and picnic areas.
[2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.151
OSR-1.9: Conduct a sports facility study to review current outdoor facility locations and
resources and a demographic study for future facility requirements as they relate
to planned growth within the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.10: Pursue additional community garden lots and spaces to meet demand and need
by the community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJE.CIIVES AND POLWIES
Park Maintenance and Retrofit
PAGE 54
OSR-1.11: Perform regular maintenance of facilities to ensure proper working order of all
recreation facilities and equipment. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.12: Retrofit parks and recreation facilities to provide disability access as required by
law. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.13: Design and reform parks to reflect the latest recreational features that respond to
demographic changes and community needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.14: Consult with law enforcement agencies, surrounding cities, community policing
groups, and OC Parks to create a safe and healthy environment at Talbert
Regional Park, Fairview Park, and along the Santa Ana River. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Long -Term Planning of Institutional Uses
OSR-1.15: Continue to pursue opportunities to create joint -use community space at facilities
owned by private organizations such as private schools, faith -based groups,
service clubs, and hospitals. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.10]
OSR-1.16: Continue to coordinate with the Newport -Mesa Unified School District to
supplement City park facilities through joint -use agreements. [2000 GP Policy
OS R-1 A.10]
OSR-1.17: Consult with Orange County Fairgrounds in implementing OC Fair & Event
Center Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Level of Service and Access
OSR-1.18: Provide a minimum of 4.26 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. [2000 GP
Policy OSR-1A.1]
OSR-1.19: Update the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan every 10 years, as
feasible. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.15]
OSR-1.20: Enhance pedestrian, bicycle, and transit linkages to meet the needs of residents
and to provide better access to parks, recreation, and public spaces. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.21: Provide opportunities for public access to all open space areas, except where
sensitive resources may be threatened or damaged, public health and safety
may be compromised, or access would interfere with the managed production of
resources. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GOAL OSR-2:
Community Services Programs Meeting Community Needs
Enhancing the community through the delivery of innovative recreational programs, quality parks and
facilities and services that promote social, physical, and emotional well-being. High-quality community
services programs demonstrate the City's commitment to providing opportunities for recreational,
physical, and educational activities for residents of all ages. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective OSR-2A: Provide activities, classes, and a variety of programs to meet the year-
round recreational needs of all residents: children, adult, seniors, and
persons with special needs. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
High-quality Community Services
PACE. ;;
OSR-2.1: Provide high-quality community services programs that are flexible and
responsive to the community's changing needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.2: Plan and conduct citywide special events that bring residents together to create
an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.3: Continue to consult with nonprofit sports organizations and recreational groups to
support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and
supplement those offered by the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.4: Update existing facilities for senior citizens, youth, adults, and overall community
use. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Community Services to Support Community Needs
OSR-2.5: Monitor and research the ever-changing community services needs of the
community, and develop action plans to address those needs through
partnerships with service agencies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.6: Continue to provide rental opportunities at community facilities and parks for
residents, nonprofit groups, and businesses to meet their recreational and
professional needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.7: Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform residents of all
available community services programs, and obtain input from the community
regarding program and service needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.8: Encourage resident input and utilize demographic data, partnerships, volunteers,
and existing resources to identify the needs of community. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
OSR-2.9: Identify innovative funding and development opportunities to support and sustain
a responsive community services network. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.10: Continue and expand the development of community partnerships to offer both
standard and innovative services to meet residents' needs. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
OSR-2.11: Develop and implement community services programs and activities that meet
the needs of specialized populations through the development of community
partnerships. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.12: Provide support for volunteer groups that conduct special activities open to the
entire community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GOAL OSR-3:
Conserved Open Space
Costa Mesa is committed to open space conservation to ensure that the network of parklands, trails,
hillsides, and undeveloped natural areas remain viable for supporting biological communities and
providing sanctuary for future generations. This commitment includes expanding public access to open
space, where appropriate, and acquiring additional lands where feasible. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective OSR-3A: Preserve the City's open space lands and provide additional community
and neighborhood parkland in underserved areas. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Open Space Preservation and Stewardship
PAGE 50
OSR-3.1: Preserve open space areas along The Santa Ana River, large open space parks,
and along the mesa formations to protect natural habitat and to maintain the
integrity of the natural environment. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-3.2: Encourage the preservation of coastal views from City and County parkland and
public streets within Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.13]
OSR-3.3: Identify current open space areas for protection, management, and potential
enhancement to maintain and, if possible, increase its value as wildlife habitat.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Management and Maintenance of Open Space
OSR-3.4: Encourage the long-term maintenance and management of open space lands
through open space easements, development rights transfers or acquisition,
zoning regulations, and other incentives. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.6]
OSR-3.5: Encourage the greening and beautifying of the Santa Ana River. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-3.6: Encourage opportunities for recreation, history, education, interpretive materials,
and art associated with the Santa Ana River open spaces. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
OSR-3.7: Promote water quality strategies to improve water quality along the Santa Ana
River. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Coordination and Organization Development
OSR-3.8: Consult with State and regional agencies and the California Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC), regarding open space planning efforts. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-3.9: Consult with the Orange Coast River Park, Inc. and surrounding cities and other
government agencies in maintaining and rehabilitating open space lands along
the Santa Ana River. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-3.10: Consult with OC Parks over the enhancements and management of Talbert
Regional Park without adversely impacting surrounding residential
neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GOAL OSR-4:
Extensive Arts and Culture Programs and Services
Provide comprehensive and multifaceted arts and culture programs and services that provide education
and entertainment to the community and a broader audience. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective OSR-4A: Support performing and visual arts programs, facilities, and activities
that stimulate the minds and intellectual thinking of community members
to increase awareness of the City's motto, "The City of the Arts." [New
Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Cultural Arts Venues
OSR-4.1: Continue to support the mission of the Segerstrom Center for the Arts and
associate venues and facilities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.2: Support the development and operations of an arts museum at the Segerstrom
Center for the Arts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 57
OSR-4.3: Encourage additional indoor and outdoor facility spaces citywide to display public
art and host arts and culture special events. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Leader in the Arts
OSR-4.4: Expand the City's role as a supporter of the arts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.5: Encourage financial support of the arts by supporting non-profit groups and
foundations. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.6: Consider preparation of an arts and culture master plan for the City. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.7: Consult with local agencies and surrounding cities to address the creation and
implementation of arts -friendly policies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.8: Enhance Costa Mesa's position as a leader in the arts in Southern California and
its recognition nationally as a city devoted to arts institutions of superior quality.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.9: Engage community members in arts activities, and utilize the arts to provide
educational and cultural awareness opportunities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.10: Continue the City's commitment to its arts in cooperation with the private sector.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.11: Provide opportunities for local artists to create and display their work. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Arts Programs and Events
OSR-4.12: Support arts activities, programs, events, and facilities for patrons to enjoy and
share experiences, and that enhance the City's economic vitality. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.13: Designate Community Services Department staff with the responsibility for
expanding and implementing activities related to recreational arts programming.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.14: Pursue cooperative educational cultural programs enlisting the aid of public and
private institutions. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Arts in Public Places and in Private Development
OSR-4.15: Continue to review adopting an Arts in Public Places Program. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.16: Pursue the placement of public art in prominent locations, particularly along
major travel corridors to enliven and beautify the public realm. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.17: Develop incentives or programs that encourage art in new developments. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS. OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Historical and Cultural Resources Element
P k(;v 58
The goals, objectives, and policies that address historical and cultural resources are as follows:
Goal HCR -1:
Historical, Archeological, and Paleontological Resource Preservation
The City of Costa Mesa supports focused efforts to provide residents with a sense of community and
history through the protection and preservation of historical and cultural resources. [2000 GP Goal
HCR -1 ]
Objective HCR -1A: Encourage preservation and protection of the City's archaeological,
paleontological, and historical resources. [2000 GP Objective HCR -1 A]
Preserving Historical Resources
HCR -1.1: Encourage protection and enhancement of the diverse range of historical sites
and resources in the City for the benefit of current and future residents and
visitors. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
HCR -1.2: Encourage the preservation of significant historical resources (as identified in
Table HCR -1) by developing and implementing incentives such as building and
planning application permit fee waivers, Mills Act contracts, grants and loans,
and implementing other incentives identified in the Historical Preservation
Ordinance. [2000 GP Policy HCR -1A.4]
HCR -1.3: Promote context -sensitive design that respects and celebrates the history and
historical character of sites and resources while meeting contemporary needs of
the community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
HCR -1.4: Require, as part of the environmental review procedure, an evaluation of the
significance of paleontological, archaeological, and historical resources, and the
impact of proposed development on those resources. [2000 GP Policy HCR -
1A.1]
HCR -1.5: Continue to identify local landmarks with markers and way -finding signage.
Include informational signage about local history, utilizing maps to highlight
locations of other historical resources at popular historical sites. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
HCR -1.6: Encourage development of an interpretive center for paleontological,
archaeological, and historical resources at Fairview Park. The center may
contain resources found in the park area as well as resources found throughout
the City. [2000 GP Policy HCR -1A.6]
Preserving Archaeological Resources
HCR -1.7: Require cultural resources studies (Le, archaeological and historical
investigations) for all applicable discretionary projects, in accordance with CEQA
regulations. The studies should identify cultural resources (i.e., prehistorical sites,
historical sites, and isolated artifacts and features) in the project area, determine
their eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources, and
provide mitigation measures for any resources in the project area that cannot be
avoided. Cultural resources studies shall be completed by a professional
archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional
Qualifications Standards in prehistorical or historical archaeology. [2000 GP
Policy HCR -1A.2 and HCR -1A.3 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-203; GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
PAGE 59
HCR -1.8: Comply with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act regarding
protection and recovery of archaeological resources discovered during
development activities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Preserving Paleontological Resources
HCR -1.9: Require paleontological studies for all applicable discretionary projects. The
studies should identify paleontological resources in the project area, and provide
mitigation measures for any resources in the project area that cannot be avoided.
[2000 GP Policy HCR -1A.2 and HCR -1A.3 — Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
HCR -1.10: Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act regarding the protection
and recovery of paleontological resources during development activities. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Appendix B
COSTA MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT
AS HOUSING AUTHORITY AND AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 UNDER CALIFORNIA
HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 34176.1 AND 34328
This Annual Report of the Costa Mesa Housing Authority (CMHA) is prepared under
California Health and Safety Code (HSC), Section 34176.1 as the housing successor,
and Section 34328 as a housing authority (together, Report). In particular, Division 24 of
the HSC sets forth the Dissolution Law in Parts 1.8 and 1.85 and the Housing Authorities
Law in Part 2, which respectively require preparation of an annual report on the housing
successor and the housing authority's activities for the prior fiscal year. This Report
details the CMHA's activities during Fiscal Year (FY) 2015-2016 and is intended to satisfy
the requirements under both HSC Sections 34328 and 34176.1. In particular, this Report
details the CMHA's activities for FY 2015-2016, including the information required about
the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF) and on other information
under Section 34176.1(f). After receipt of the complete, final CAFR (term defined below)
that is expected by the end of December 2016, then this Report will be finalized using
data in the CAFR and will be provided to, and will be presented for joint consideration and
action by the City Council and Housing Authority Board in January 2017.
This Report includes information prepared by City staff on behalf of the CMHA and d a t a
f r o m the independent financial audit of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset
Fund Financial Report for FY 2015-2016 (C A F R) as prepared by White Nelson Diehl
Evans LLP, which audit is separate from this Report; further, this Report conforms with
and is organized into sections I. through XIV., inclusive, under Section 34176.1(f) of the
Dissolution Law:
1. Amounts Received and Deposited Under 34191.4(b)(3)(A). This section
provides the total amount of funds paid to the City and the amount deposited into
the LMIHAF allocable to 20% of the repayments on the reinstated City/Agency
loan per Section 34191.4.
II. Amount Deposited into LMIHAF. This section provides the total amount of funds
deposited into the LMIHAF in FY 15-16 and itemized by amounts deposited in FY
15-16 for items listed on Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS),
amounts allocable to Section 34191.4 deposits, and other amounts deposited into
the LMIHAF.
III. Ending Balance of LMIHAF. This section provides a statement of the balance in
the LMIHAF as of the close of FY 15-16. Any amounts deposited for items listed
on the ROPS, and amounts allocable to Section 34191.4 deposits, must be
distinguished from the other amounts deposited.
IV. Description of Expenditures from LMIHAF. This section provides a description
of expenditures made from the LMIHAF during FY 15-16. The expenditures are
to be categorized among (A) administration for monitoring, preserving covenanted
housing units, (B) homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services and
(C) development of housing.
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e l
V. Statutory Value of Assets Owned by Housing Successor. This section
provides the statutory value of real property owned by the Housing Successor,
the value of loans and grants receivables, and the sum of these two amounts.
VI. Description of Transfers. This section describes transfers, if any, to another
housing successor made in previous fiscal year(s), including whether the funds
are unencumbered and the status of projects, if any, for which the transferred
LMIHAF will be used. The sole purpose of the transfers must be for development
of transit priority projects, permanent supportive housing, housing for agricultural
employees or special needs housing.
VII. Project Descriptions. This section describes any project for which the Housing
Successor receives or holds property tax revenue under the ROPS and the status
of that project.
VIII. Status of Compliance with Section 33334.16. As and if applicable, this section
provides a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16 for interests in real
property acquired by the former redevelopment agency prior to February 1, 2012.
For interests in real property acquired on or after February 1, 2012, provide a
status update on the project.
IX. Description of Outstanding Obligations under Section 33413. This section
describes outstanding inclusionary and replacement housing obligations, if any,
under Section 33413 that remained outstanding prior to dissolution of the former
redevelopment agency as of February 1, 2012, along with the Housing
Successor's progress in meeting those prior obligations, if any, of the former
redevelopment agency and how the Housing Successor's plans to meet unmet
obligations, if any.
X. Income Test. This section provides information required by Section
34176.1(a)(3)(B), or a description of expenditures by income category and
restriction for the applicable five-year period, with the time period beginning
January 1, 2014 and whether the statutory thresholds have been met. However,
reporting of the Income Test is not required until 2019.
XI. Senior Housing Test. This section provides the percentage of deed -restricted
rental housing units restricted to seniors and assisted individually or jointly by the
Housing Successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction
within the previous 10 years in relation to the aggregate number of units of deed -
restricted rental housing assisted individually or jointly by the Housing Successor,
its former redevelopment agency and its host jurisdiction within the same 10 -year
time period.
XII. Excess Surplus Test: This section provides the amount of excess surplus in the
LMIHAF, if any, and the length of time that the Housing Successor has had excess
surplus, and the Housing Successor's plan for eliminating the excess surplus.
XIII. Inventory of Homeownership Units: This section provides a summary of
covenanted homeownership units assisted by the former redevelopment agency
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 12
or the housing successor that include equity sharing and repayment provisions,
including: (A) number of units; (B) number of units lost to the portfolio in the last
fiscal year and the reason for those losses, and (C) any funds returned to the
housing successor due to losses or repayments.
XIV. Additional Information: CMHA's Activities for the Preceding Year FY 15-16 under
HSC Section 34328.
This Report is to be provided to CMHA and its governing body, the City Council, in
accordance with the Dissolution Law and the HAL. In addition, this Report will be posted
and made available to the public on the City's website (www. costa mesaca.gov).
I. AMOUNTS RECEIVED AND DEPOSITED UNDER SECTION 34191.4(B)(3)(A)
In FY 15-16, a total of $811,376 attributable to the reinstated City/Agency loan under
Section 34191.4 was approved by DOF and remitted via the first annual ROPS 16-17
and; of that amount, $649,101 (allocable to 80% of $811,376) was remitted by the
Successor Agency to the City, and $162,275 was deposited into the LMIHAF upon
receipt in June 2016 (allocable to 20% of $811,376).
II. AMOUNTS DEPOSITED INTO LMIHAF
• The amount of $162,275 was deposited into the LMIHAF allocable to FY15-16
equal to 20% of the monies received by the City in repayment of the reinstated
City/Agency loan per Section 34191.4 for ROPS 16-17; plus
• $0 was held for items listed on the ROPS; plus
• Other deposits into the LMIHAF in FY 15-16 of: (1) $343,792 rental income,
(2) $405,714 loan repayments, and (3) $10,479 investment income.
In sum, the cumulative total is $922,260 of all deposits into the LMIHAF during FY 15-16.
III. ENDING BALANCE OF LMIHAF
At the close of FY 15-16, the ending balance in the LMIHAF was $1,148,308, of which
$0 is held for items listed on the ROPS.
IV. DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURES FROM LMIHAF
The table on the next page lists and describes expenditures from LMIHAF by category
for FY 15-16:
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 1 3
Fiscal Year 15-16
Costs for monitoring, enforcement and preserving the
$139,009
Monitoring and
long-term affordable housing covenants imposed by the
Administration
former redevelopment agency or CMHA as housing
Expenditures
successor and costs to administer homeless prevention
and rapid rehousing supportive services, and toward
development and preservation of housing.
The maximum expenditure for this category in FY 15-16
is the greater of (a) 5% of the statutory value of (i) real
property owned by the housing successor and (ii) loans
and grants receivable, or (b) $200,000 (plus allowed CPI
adjustments).
Based on the valuation listed in Section V.,
[lines 4+5 in that table=$8,824,257] for FY 15-16, so the
CMHA as housing successor was authorized to spend
u to $441,121.85, but expended only $139,009.
Homeless
Costs for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing
$64,558
Prevention and
supportive services for individuals and families who are
Rapid Rehousing
homeless or would be homeless but for this assistance.
Services
Expenditures
The housing successor was authorized to spend up to
$250,000 for this category in FY 15-16 $64,558 was
expended.
Housing
Costs for housing "development", which term is defined
$482,625
Development
to include: (a) new construction, (b) acquisition and
Expenditures
rehabilitation, (c) substantial rehabilitation, (d) long-term
affordability covenants on multifamily units, and
(e) preservation of assisted affordable housing that is
eligible for (i) prepayment, (ii) termination, or (iii) for
which the expiration of rental restrictions is scheduled to
occur within five years.
The 30 housing units in default by the former
owner/operator (CCBHC) had been subject to
termination from CCBHC defaults, therefore were
preserved by the CMHA. All 30 units are now owned by
the CMHA and operated through professional property
management as Low and Very Low Income housing.
Total: FY 15-16
Total
LMIHAF
$686,192
Expenditures
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 14
V. STATUTORY VALUE OF ASSETS OWNED BY HOUSING SUCCESSOR IN LMIHAF
Under the Dissolution Law and for purposes of this Report, the "statutory value of real
property" means the value of properties formerly held by the former redevelopment
agency as listed on the housing asset transfer schedule approved by the Department of
Finance as listed in such schedule under Section 34176(a)(2), the value of the
properties transferred to the Housing Successor under Section 34181(f), and the
purchase price of property(ies) purchased by the Housing Successor. Further, the value
of loans and grants receivable is included in these reported assets held in the LMIHAF.
The following table provides the statutory value of assets owned by the Housing
Successor as of the end of FY 15-16:
VI. DESCRIPTION OF TRANSFERS
The Housing Successor did not make any LMIHAF transfers to other
Housing Successor(s) under Section 34176.1(c)(2) during FY 15-16.
VII. APPROVED ROPS PROJECTS
The Housing Successor does not receive or hold property tax revenue under a ROPS.
VIII. STATUS OF COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 33334.16
Section 34176.1 provides that Section 33334.16 does not apply to interests in real
property acquired by the Housing Successor on or after February 1, 2012.
With respect to interests in real property acquired by the former Agency prior to
February 1, 2012, the time periods described in Section 33334.16 shall be deemed to
have commenced on the date that the Department of Finance approved the property as
a housing asset in the LMIHAF; thus, as to real property acquired by the former
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 15
As of June 30, 2016
end of FY 15-16
1. Cash and Investments
$1,205,578
2. Interest Receivable
$1,346
3. Rent Receivable
$16,903
4. Statutory Value of Real Property Owned by
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
$5,359,665
5. Value of Loans and Grants Receivable
$3,464,592
Total Value
$10,048,084
VI. DESCRIPTION OF TRANSFERS
The Housing Successor did not make any LMIHAF transfers to other
Housing Successor(s) under Section 34176.1(c)(2) during FY 15-16.
VII. APPROVED ROPS PROJECTS
The Housing Successor does not receive or hold property tax revenue under a ROPS.
VIII. STATUS OF COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 33334.16
Section 34176.1 provides that Section 33334.16 does not apply to interests in real
property acquired by the Housing Successor on or after February 1, 2012.
With respect to interests in real property acquired by the former Agency prior to
February 1, 2012, the time periods described in Section 33334.16 shall be deemed to
have commenced on the date that the Department of Finance approved the property as
a housing asset in the LMIHAF; thus, as to real property acquired by the former
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 15
redevelopment agency now held by the Housing Successor in the LMIHAF, the Housing
Successor must initiate activities consistent with development (as the term is explained
in Section IV. and Section 34176.1(a)(3)(D)) of the real property for the purpose for
which it was acquired within five years of the date the DOF approved such property as
a housing asset.
In this regard, the CMHA, as housing successor, did not own any real property acquired
for development (to be developed) as of dissolution on February 1, 2012 subject to this
limitation so the five-year limitation of Section 33334.16 does not apply.
It is noted that the former redevelopment agency did hold at dissolution, now the CMHA
holds as landlord/ground lessor, the underlying fee interests in the three Ground Leases
with Costa Mesa Family Village, a California limited partnership, as tenant/ground lessee
(affiliate of Shapell Properties) relating to the existing 72 -unit multifamily affordable
housing apartment development called Costa Mesa Family Village located at 1924 and
1981 Wallace Avenue and 2015 Pomona Avenue. The three ground leases end/expire
in 2039. Section 33334.16 does not apply to such ground leases and this existing
affordable housing development as the subject property was not held for development;
it is developed property.
IX. DESCRIPTION OF OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS UNDER SECTION 33413
Replacement Housing: Under the former redevelopment agency's last Implementation
Plan in effect prior to dissolution (the 2010-2014 plan) for the former redevelopment
agency, the former agency's replacement housing obligations, if any, under Section
33413(a) were transferred to the CMHA as Housing Successor; however, the former
redevelopment agency had no outstanding replacement housing obligations as of
dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Inclusionary/Production Housing. Under the former redevelopment agency's last
Implementation Plan in effect prior to dissolution (the 2010-2014 plan), the former
agency's inclusionary/production housing obligations, if any, under Section 33413(b)
were transferred to the CMHA as Housing Successor; however, the former
redevelopment agency had no outstanding inclusionary/production housing obligations
as of dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Under the former redevelopment agency's last Implementation Plan in effect prior to
dissolution (the 2010-2014 plan), the former redevelopment agency's
inclusionary/production housing obligations, if any, under Section 33413(b) were
transferred to the CMHA as Housing Successor; however, the former redevelopment
agency had no outstanding inclusionary/production housing obligations as of dissolution
on February 1, 2012.
Therefore, the Housing Successor has no outstanding replacement or
inclusionary/production housing obligations and thus no implementation obligation under
Section 33413. For information, the former Agency's Implementation Plan is posted on
the City's website at (www. costa mesaca.gov).
X. EXTREMELY -LOW INCOME TEST
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 16
Section 34176. 1 (a)(3)(B) requires that the Housing Successor must require at least 30%
of the LMIHAF to be expended for development of rental housing affordable to and
occupied by households earning 30% or less of the AMI. If the Housing Successor were
to fail to comply with the Extremely -Low Income requirement in any five-year report, then
the Housing Successor must ensure that at least 50% of the funds remaining in the
LMIHAF be expended in each fiscal year following the latest fiscal year following the
report on households earning 30% or less of the AMI until the Housing Successor
demonstrates compliance with the Extremely -Low Income requirement. This information
is not required to be reported until 2019 for the 2014-2019 period.
XI. SENIOR HOUSING TEST
The Housing Successor is to calculate the percentage of units of deed -restricted rental
housing restricted to seniors and assisted by the Housing Successor, the former
redevelopment agency and/or the City within the previous 10 years in relation to the
aggregate number of units of deed -restricted rental housing assisted by the Housing
Successor, the former redevelopment agency and/or City within the same time period.
If this percentage exceeds 50%, then the Housing Successor cannot expend future funds
in the LMIHAF to assist additional senior housing units until the Housing Successor or
City assists and construction has commenced on a number of restricted rental units that
is equal to 50% of the total amount of deed -restricted rental units.
As reported in the prior FY 14-15 annual report, for the 10 -year period of January 1,
2004 to January 1, 2014 evidences that 9.8% of the funds were expended on assistance
to provide senior affordable housing units and 90.2% of the funds were expended on
assistance to provide non-senior/family affordable housing units. In particular, 36 senior
units with long-term 55 -year affordability covenants were established during the previous
10 -year period (specifically, the St. John's Manor Project).
For the current 10 -year period of January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2024 that includes the
subject FY 15-16, the CMHA expended no funds($0) for senior housing; therefore 0% of
funds were expended on development or assistance to develop senior housing units.
XII. EXCESS SURPLUS TEST
The term excess surplus is defined as: "an unencumbered amount in the [LMIHAF] account
that exceeds the greater of one million dollars ($1,000,000) or the aggregate amount
deposited into the account during the housing successor's preceding four fiscal years,
whichever is greater." The housing successor existed as of February 1, 2012, so the four
preceding fiscal years were the first four of the Housing Successor's existence. For this
Report the aggregate deposits for the four preceding fiscal years of FY 11-12, FY 12-13, FY
13-14 and FY 14-15 totaled $1,531,978. The unencumbered account balance as of the end
of FY 15-16 (June 30, 2016) was $1,088,503. The LMIHAF does not have an Excess
Surplus.
XIII. INVENTORY OF HOMEOWNERSHIP UNITS.
This section provides an inventory of homeownership units assisted by the former
redevelopment agency and assumed by the CMHA, as housing successor, that are subject
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 17
to covenants or restrictions or to an adopted program that protects the former
redevelopment agency's investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund per Section 33334.3(f).
The total homeownership inventory as of dissolution on February 1. 2012
(subparagraph (A) below) and the inventory, and losses and repayments for the period
February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015 (subparagraph (B) below) include:
(A) As of dissolution on February 1, 2012, the total number of homeownership units assisted
by the former redevelopment agency and that have covenants and restrictions of record
is 41 units, which includes loans and restricted single-family homes assisted by the
former redevelopment agency through its (1) First Time Homebuyer Program, (2)
Single -Family Rehabilitation Program, (3) affordable housing projects with Habitat for
Humanity of Orange County, and (4) the Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
(B) The total number of homeownership units lost to the CMHA/Housing Successor's
portfolio between February 1, 2012 up to June 30, 2015, along with the reason or
reasons for those losses.
Total losses between February 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015: 27 units
Reason for loss from homeownership portfolio of each such unit:
Principal Repayments: $285,816.11
Loan Impairment: $1,095,000.00
Foreclosure: $436,000.00
Funds returned to the CMHA/Housing Successor as part of an adopted program that
protects the former Agency's investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund. This includes repayments of all such loans including principal, interest,
and equity sharing payments between February 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015: $301,584.00
(principal, interest and fees).
(C) The number of homeownership units lost to the CMHA/Housing Successor's portfolio in
FY 15-16 and the reason for those losses.
Total losses to portfolio in FY 15-16 is: 3 units
Reason for loss from homeownership portfolio in FY 15-16 of each such unit:
Principal Repayments:
Three (3) homeownership loans were fully paid -off, so 3 units were lost on the
homeownership inventory during FY 15-16; the total from the 3 full homeownership loan
repayments, which was deposited into the LMIHAF is $169,829.12.
In addition in FY 15-16, for seven (7) homeownership loans the owners made monthly
amortized payments, which total payments amount to $8,804.46, which loan payments
were deposited into the LMIHAF.
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 18
Therefore, the funds returned to the CMHA/Housing Successor as part of an adopted
program that protects the former Agency's investment of moneys from the former
redevelopment agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, including
repayments of all SF Rehab and FTHB loans including principal, interest, and equity
sharing payments during FY 2015-16: $178,633.61.
(D) The CMHA/Housing Successor does have existing consulting agreements with:
Amerinational Community Services, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation and Farmers State
Bank of Hartland, a Minnesota corporation relating to certain, but not all, aspects of
administration of the former Agency's Single Family Rehabilitation Program and First
Time Homebuyer program (FTHB) that provided second lien mortgages for
homeownership units. These consulting services include assistance with oversight and
administration of amortized loan payments, if any, due; with tracking and calculation of
loan balances in the event of payoff; and, other administrative activities for these
outstanding SF Rehab and FTHB loans. In addition, the CMHA retains the services of
Keyser Marston Associates, a professional housing economic consultant, and the
CMHA legal counsel, Celeste Brady of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, assists staff
in review of legal issues related to the outstanding SF Rehab and FTHB loans, such as
and including relating to refinancing of first lien mortgages so long as consistent with
the SF Rehab and FTHB program refinancing criteria, repayments, impairment
analyses, defaults, foreclosures, bankruptcies, renting out part of the home, short sale
requests, and other issues that arise in the administration of the former Agency's loan
programs for ownership housing.
XIV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT CMHA'S ACTIVITIES FOR THE
PRECEDING YEAR FY 15-16 PER HSC SECTION 34328
Without repeating the information presented above in this report, the CMHA:
(1) continued to monitor and enforce the housing assets transferred from the former
redevelopment agency to the CMHA as housing successor;
(2) proceeded with and completed non -judicial foreclosure proceedings initiated by the
City of Costa Mesa and the Housing Authority that were pending during FY 15-16.
Trustee sales by auction were held (after June 30, 2015 but within the 60 -day reporting
in the CAFR) on August 28, 2015 at the Santa Ana Superior Court for three (of the four)
affordable housing projects that had been owned and operated by Civic Center Barrio
Housing Corporation ("CCBHC"), including:
(a) 707, 711 W. 18th St., 8 units in two 4-plexes; 8 Low Income units; former
redevelopment agency, now a Housing Authority loan, with successful credit bid of
$753,471.87.
(b) 734, 740, 744 James St., 11 units in one 3-plex and two 4-plexes; 9 Low and 2
Very Low Income units; City loan with successful credit bid of $1,180,026.24;
(c) 745 W. 18th St., 3 units in one 3-plex; 3 Very Low Income units; City loan with
successful credit bid of $450,563.65; and
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 19
(3) proceeded with and completed non -judicial foreclosure proceedings initiated by the
City of Costa Mesa in FY 14-15 and completed in FY 15-16. The Trustee sale by auction
was held on February 1, 2016 at the Santa Ana Superior Court for one affordable
housing project (the fourth of four) that had been owned and operated by Civic Center
Barrio Housing Corporation ("CCBHC"):
(a) 8 Very Low Income affordable rental units located at 717, 721 James Street, Costa
Mesa, adjacent to the above -listed units. At the Trustee sale, the City's credit bid of
$2,150,607.48 was the successful and only bid to acquire the Property.
(4) All 30 of the affordable rental units acquired through the foreclosure proceedings are
now vested with the Costa Mesa Housing Authority. During FY 15-16, the CMHA
retained the professional property management services of Pro Active Property
Management to operate these 30 Very Low and Low Income units.
(5) As housing successor under Section 34176.1(a)(2), the Housing Authority may
expend up to $250,000 per fiscal year "for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing
services for individuals and families who are homeless or would be homeless but for
this assistance, including the provision of short-term or medium-term rental assistance,
housing relocation and stabilization services including housing search, mediation, or
outreach to property owners, credit repair, security or utility deposits, utility payments,
rental assistance for a final month at a location, moving cost assistance, and case
management, or other appropriate activities for homelessness prevention and rapid
rehousing of persons who have become homeless." In this regard in FY 15-16 and as
detailed in this Report, the Housing Authority provided partial funding for Community
Outreach Workers who assertively work toward placing homeless individuals and
families into temporary or permanent housing as it becomes available. The part-time
staff addresses the various needs represented by our homeless population on a daily
basis. Further, a part-time Management Analyst maintains the database that
Community Outreach Workers and volunteers from varied community groups utilize to
streamline their reporting and recordkeeping processes relative to placement of
homeless individuals and families into housing.
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 15-16 P a g e 110