HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - - Additional Documents - 12/5/2017CITY OF COSTA MESA
Department of Public Services/Administration
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Raja Sethuraman, Public Services Director
DATE: December 4, 2017
SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UPDATE
This informational memorandum provides a progress update of the City's street
improvement projects. Provided herein are projects that are currently under design
or construction, or planned for future fiscal years by the Public Services
Department. Staff continues to work to effectively and efficiently complete the
various street improvement projects approved each fiscal year. However, many
projects are multi-year endeavors and require coordination and cooperation
between various entities throughout the planning, design, and construction
phases.
Please contact me with any questions or concerns regarding the progress of these
projects.
Attachments: 1. Projects Under Design
2. Projects Under Construction
3. Future Planned Projects
c Tom Hatch, City Manager
Tamara Letourneau, Assistant City Manager
Brenda Green, City Clerk
Baltazar Mejia, City Engineer
Jennifer Rosales, Transportation Services Manager
Amber Haston, Management Analyst
ATTACHMENT 1
City of Costa Mesa, CA
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN
Active Transportation Projects
Bicycle Racks at Public Parks and Facilities
Placentia Avenue Bicycle/Pedestrian Signal
Street Improvement Projects
Harbor Boulevard Median Improvement Project lWilson Street 119th Street
Hyland Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvements
Traffic Operations Projects
Baker Street/Coolidge Avenue Traffic Signal Modification Project
Sunflower Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
West 17th Street Widening Project I Placentia Avenue iSuperior Avenue
Other Projects
Active Transportation Plan
Citywide Way Finding Signage Program
1-405 Widening Project
Traffic Impact Fee Update
City of Costa Mesa, CA
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN
MPRH (Arterials/Collectors)
Hamilton St
Pomona Ave
Harbor Blvd
Santa Ana Ave
22nd St
23rd St
Locals
23rd St
Elden Ave
Waterman Way
Pomona Ave
16th St
18th St
1of 1
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
ERG REEN PL.
DOGWOOD ST.
CEDAR PL.
ARBOR ST.
9TH ST.
ml
ALLEY 1
LATER OF
TOWNE ST.
18TH ST.
PLUMER IT.
ALLEY 6 � �
WELLO DR. CENTER ST <�
scoTr PL.
0
18TH ST. g
HAMILTON ST. I V
BAY ST.
ALLEY #40
FORD RD.
yf
c
ALLEY #41
BERNARD ST.
T �o
19TH ST.
G�Jp P jDO
PLUMER ST.
S, g<�
1
0
COSTA
MESA
PARK pe a; o yp r
v O
D a o.01
PARK D
fRs yBs
r
Q 93
'may sr 3�y� sJ yfsTfy
gift
Sb.
J�
e a
Q
P SP
cy
fs
}
y`S3
P� 9
q( i
tEy ?o
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN LOCATION MAP
® STREET LOCATIONS
Page 1 of 2
KNOWELL PL.
WllWW
POMONA
REA CENTER
STERLING AV.
BAY ST.
YORKSHIRE
COVE ST.
ST.
20TH
S .
SEAL ST.
ROSS ST.
SURF ST.
BEACH SE.
BERNARD ST.
3
ALLEY #18 ¢
ALLEY #124
19TH ST.
PLUMER IT.
ALLEY 6 � �
WELLO DR. CENTER ST <�
scoTr PL.
0
18TH ST. g
HAMILTON ST. I V
BAY ST.
ALLEY #40
FORD RD.
yf
c
ALLEY #41
BERNARD ST.
T �o
19TH ST.
G�Jp P jDO
PLUMER ST.
S, g<�
1
0
COSTA
MESA
PARK pe a; o yp r
v O
D a o.01
PARK D
fRs yBs
r
Q 93
'may sr 3�y� sJ yfsTfy
gift
Sb.
J�
e a
Q
P SP
cy
fs
}
y`S3
P� 9
q( i
tEy ?o
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN LOCATION MAP
® STREET LOCATIONS
Page 1 of 2
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
IIiV/// o N U
p O
2�3Q p04, Q Oe4? Q
20 p2
VICTORIA ST. �aRO ST G4,P pP�
FRr
C.
P P
2�� pt0 T NF yOP Oy
21g LSA <F9NfjT d� 3 Qe.
�N F
P
O�2P -4fRR ( `S9 @q 20 5 4P�y
cyNf FN ~ e``�s
� e9} o p2 TT9Cf <n, Jep` QST \
ST 9yO} 9L�Nf 2p'Q ,
17
� e0 g B9y9
<OOy 1� P Se PP2 O �FyO e9Y
N 3��
ROe �O° HEINZ 9
KAISER J.
MONTE VISTA
p� E3
OV' Irtllll(1711LLLII�I mI
P
CR9 GO
°R O2P
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN LOCATION MAP
® STREET LOCATIONS
Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Costa Mesa, CA
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Traffic Operations Projects
Adams Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
Bristol Street Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
Harbor Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
Newport Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
Other Projects
Project V - Transit Circulator
City of Costa Mesa, CA
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Alleys
Alley 077
Orange Ave
W'ly end
Alley 070
Orange Ave
Westminster Ave
Alley 078
Orange Ave
Westminster Ave
Alley 085
Alley 079
Orange Ave
Westminster Ave
Westminster Ave
Westminster Ave
Santa Ana Ave
Santa Ana Ave
Alley 086
Alley 088
Raymond Ave
Tustin Ave
Alley 036
Caraway Dr
Wintergreen PI
Alley 012
20th St
Sterling Ave
Alley 014
19th St
20th St
MPAH (Arterials/Collectors)
Arlington Dr
Fairview Rd
Newport Blvd
Bear St
405 Fwy
Wakeham St
Bristol St
405 Fwy
Randolph Ave
Harbor Blvd / Gisler Ave
Intersection
Mesa Dr
Placentia Ave
Adams Ave
Wilson St
Locals
24th PI
Cul-de-sac
Hill PI
Albert PI
Newport Blvd
Santa Ana Ave
Cannonade Cir
Venetian Dr
Cul-de-sac
Club Mesa PI
Cul-de-sac
Mesa Dr
College Ave
Village Way
Baker St
Cynthia Ct
Cul-de-sac
Santa Ana Ave
Dale Way
Harbor Blvd
College Ave
Damascus Cir
Smalley Rd
Cul-de-sac
Fairway Dr
Monte Vista Ave
Del Mar Ave
Georgeanne PI
Elden Ave
Cul-de-sac
Greenbrook Dr
South Coast Dr
Dahlia Ave
Hill PI
24th PI
Cul-de-sac
Lilian PI
Orange Ave
Fairway Dr
Logan Ave
College Ave
Mc Clintock Way
Monterey Ave
Salvador St
EL CAMINO DR
Newport Blvd Frontage (northbound)
Southerly City Limits
17th St
Norse Ave
Santa Isabel Ave
Cul-de-sac
Nutmeg PI
Mace Ave
Deodar Ave
Orange Ave
22nd St
Santa Isabel Ave
1of 3
City of Costa Mesa, CA
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Orange Ave
From
To
Del Mar Ave
Santa Isabel Ave
Pinecreek Dr
Adams Ave
Village Way
San Leandro Ln
South Coast Dr
Redding Ln
Secretariat Cir
Smalley Rd
Cul-de-sac
Susannah PI
Orange Ave
Cul-de-sac
Venetian Dr
Damascus Cir
Cannonade Cir
Village Way
Harbor Blvd
Pinecreek Dr
Wakeham PI
Cul-de-sac
Bear St
Wilson St
Orange Ave
Santa Ana Ave
SLURRY LOCATIONS:
Azalea Dr
Begonia Ave
Fuschia St
Begonia Ave
Smalley Rd
Azalea St
Bonnie PI
Santa Isabel Ave
Cul-de-sac
Carlton PI
Santa Isabel Ave
24th PI
Carmel Dr
South Coast Dr
Salinas Ave
Carnation Ave
Fuschia St
Cul-de-sac
Crocus Cir
Larkspur St
Cul-de-sac
Dahlia Ave
Fuschia St
Cul-de-sac
Danielle Dr
Wimbledon Way
Deedee Dr
Davis PI
Monte Vista Ave
Cul-de-sac
Debra Dr
Deedee Dr
Salinas Ave
Deedee Dr
Debra Dr
San Jose Ave
Elden Ave
Mesa Dr
Santa Isabel Ave
Fairway Dr
Brentwood St
Monte Vista Ave
Fairway PI
Fairway Dr
Orange Ave
Fuschia St
Sunflower Ave
Dahlia Ave
Geranium Ln
Poppy Cir
Begonia Ave
Goldenrod Dr
Plumeria PI
Begonia Ave
Jasmine Cir
Larkspur St
Cul-de-sac
Lantana Ln
Carnation Ave
Begonia Ave
Larkspur St
Dahlia Ave
Carnation Ave
Lavender Ln
Begonia Ave
Poppy Cir
Lisa Ln
Cul-de-sac
Elden Ave
Lupine Cir
Cul-de-sac
Goldenrod Dr
Marigold Cir
Dahlia Ave
Cul-de-sac
Mesa Dr
Orange Ave
Santa Ana Ave
Monaco Terr
Riviera Dr
Monte Vista Ave
Monte Vista Ave
Newport Blvd
Irvine Ave
Norse Ave
Cul-de-sac
Santa Isabel Ave
2of 3
City of Costa Mesa, CA
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Nutmeg PI
Deodar Ave
Mace Ave
Orange Ave
Del Mar Ave
Mesa Dr
Plumeria PI
Begonia Ave
Goldenrod Dr
Poppy Cir
Lavender Ln
Geranium St
Redding Ave
Visalia Dr
San Leandro Ln
Riviera Dr
Rue De Cannes
Tustin Ave
Rue De Cannes
Riviera Dr
Monte Vista Ave
Salinas Ave
Wimbledon Way
Smalley Rd
San Jose Ave
Deedee Dr
Santa Clara Cir
San Marino Cir
Santa Rosa Ave
Cul-de-sac
San Pablo Cir
Cul-de-sac
Smalley Rd
San Rafael Cir
Santa Rosa Ave
Cul-de-sac
Santa Ana Ave
Mesa Dr
23rd St
Santa Clara Cir
Salinas Ave
Cul-de-sac
Santa Cruz Cir
Cul-de-sac
Smalley Rd
Santa Isabel Ave
Newport Blvd
Tustin Ave
Santa Rosa Ave
Santa Clara Cir
Smalley Rd
Santo Tomas St
Cul-de-sac
Santa Ana Ave
Smalley Rd
Salinas Ave
Sunflower Ave
South Coast Dr
Fairview Rd
San Leandro Ln
Tulare Dr
Salinas Ave
San Leandro Ln
Turlock Dr
Redding Ave
Salinas Ave
Vallejo Cir
Cul-de-sac
Smalley Rd
Visalia Dr
San Leandro Ln
Redding Ave
Westminster PI
Monte Vista Ave
Cul-de-sac
Wimbledon Way
South Coast Dr
Sunflower Ave
Wisteria Cir
Dahlia Ave
Cul-de-sac
Sof 3
tCITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
J
20TH ST. a
a ALLEY #106
a ALVA LN.
I ESTHER ST. ESTHER ST.
F)>-vw
a ESTHER ST.
z ESTHER ST.
o w ALLEY #107 > ALLEY 09 ESTHER ST.
~ wo
Q J
a
ST. WALNUT ST. Q o WALNUT PL.
WALNUT PL.
Q
ALLEY #110 ALLEY #111
COSTA MESA ST.
ALLEY #112 ALLEY #113 ALLEY #114
19TH ST. 19TH ST.
ALLEY #70 ALLEY #71 ALLEY #72 W ALLEY #74
FLOWER ST. Q FLOWER ST. a
LLEY #76 ALLEY #77 ALLEY #78 ALLEY #79 o ALLEY #80 ALLEY #81
a 0>
z BROADWAY a
LLE"83 w ALLEY #84 ALLEY #85 ALLEY #86 ALLEY #87 ALLEY #88 ALLEY #89
J
o �
�- 5MAGNOLIA ST.
�"o° ALLEY #91 ALLEY #92 ALLEY #93 ALLEY #94
18TH ST.
ALLEY #96
,5 w ALLEY #95
w Q ABBIE WY.
z
oa ROCHESTER z
ESTER ST. o Q ROCHESTER ST.
w Q >
z ST. z HARPER Q
� Q w
C Q SCHOOL
PARK CABRILLO ST. —
CABRILLO ST. z
Q � ALLEY #99 � ~
Dz
zCn ALLEY #128
0 ALLEY #98 } o }
ALLEY #101 17TH ST.
REHABILITATION OF ALLEY NOs.
70, 77, 78, 79, 85, 86, 88 AND 36 LOCATION MAP
CITY PROJECT #16-03
PROPOSED ALLEY LOCATIONS
PAGE 1 OF 3
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
J L lJ I
> J)ASC
CHARLES W.
a o TEWINKLE
0 o CALIFORNIA
o
U
4DAGA AR ST.
a �
} a
U Q
a
Q� CD
GISLER AV.
ALLEY #31
CORIANDER
ALLEY #32
a CARAWAY DR.
ST
w DATE
ENUTMEG
a.
m
0
0
0
SAN
GISLER AV.
e��
z
m
0
S'
HAMROCK
O
m
0
m w
m 0
¢ w
J
0
U
BAKER ST.
GARLINGFORO ST.
h
KILLYBROOKE
2'
S0
`Z=
GALWAY Y
0
0 2
LN.
P
r Q
REHABILITATION OF ALLEY NOs.
70, 77, 78, 79, 85, 86, 88 AND 36 LOCATION MAP
CITY PROJECT #16-03
PROPOSED ALLEY LOCATIONS
PAGE 2 OF 3
North
CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S.
Public Services/ Engineering
PL
PINE
z
a J J
PL
¢ ¢ w
HAMILTON ST.
REA so 0 cTR.
#i
KNOWELL PL.
a_
POMONA
REA CENTER
Q
STERLING AV.
r
BAY ST.
>
¢
J
w
U
g
w
J
¢ N
z
J
w
J
COVE ST. YORKSHIRE
a
=
z
0�
U
0
¢
ST.
U
T.
0 H ST.
SEAL ST.
ROSS ST.
a
o SURF ST. > }
0 ¢ >
z w ¢ a
Q z w J
a
w
a Q
} a a �
BEACH ST.
ERNARD ST.
¢ J
¢
¢
¢
J
¢
w ¢
z
a 0
w
J
w
0
w
Q
ALLEY #124
ALLEY #18
19TH ST.
sR. cENrER
LEY 1
#iso3o
PLUMER ST. PLUMER ST.
CENTER ST.
ALLEY #6 > FIRE STA. #3
J #isioo
a
LIBRARY (DDL)V 1,514n
¢
REHABILITATION OF ALLEY NOs.
70, 77, 78, 79, 85, 86, 88 AND 36 LOCATION MAP
CITY PROJECT #16-03
PROPOSED ALLEY LOCATIONS
PAGE 3 OF 3
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
OPy9 PV' SpMPR Pl.
BALTRA PL Z _ CIR. E( CL AOR g OPNJ ALLEY 29
4YO,y 9q C1R. Ry m r
OL
•
op 9ALEARIC pP' C/R PAROS CIR. Slip SF,Q O MINORCA DR.
-
1 0 1re�( O MESq yERDE PARK MINORGP Pl. PONDEROSA ST. r
R
CAPELLA CT �� RHODES DR. ° �y
ELM ST.
P
11 El .
P O�
S. CAPELLA IT, DOA VISTA
CIR. e
CALVERT AV. ESTANCIA PITCAIRN DR, N
PARK
ADAMS AV. ADAMS AV.
FLAMINGO DR. o z
x
v
3
GOLDEN EVE PL PELICAN PL. zA - UMMINGBIRD DR.
ORIOLE DR.
MANDARIN DR, e'
a1 � KILLDEER O MESA VERDE DR. EAST
GI
p ?P KINGLET CT. POS`
OO � Y _
PHALAROPE CT. N �f
COVP�'
AN OERLING
P A g U GpS;
CIR. g
SWAN DR. a
SWAN CIR. TANAGER DR.
F
d
WARTHM
ELMHURS
LAI
M
ARION PARSONS -,ALLEY #1911�
ESTANCIA
HI. ALLEY #19A ALLEY 1199 aALLEV b19C¢ Q ALLEY #19E
JOANN ST. JOANN ST. ALLEY #19F
TRADUCO
CIR.
MO DJESKA
CI
I DARRELL ST. <<
o
z
g
WILSON ST.
DARRELL ST. 3 <3
WILSON
oo
CA
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION MAP
STREET REHABILITATION LOCATIONS
Page 1 of 5
North
N.T.S.
CITY OF COSTA MESA
Public Services/ Engineering
GISLER AV,
aGARLINGFORD
LONDONDERRY ST.
ST.
ITE,:T
CHARLESTo
zz z zCARSONQ z Y 'w
U
�KILLYBROOKE of
o m
Y
ST. MC GORMACK LN.aBELFAST
DATET'< rNUTMEG
AV.
SHAMROCK C z = z�aARNELLQ qY w r !yq �� PL.
AUSTIN ST.
=TSQw
ATLANTA WYDONEGA
a
;;
o �r J PL.
m GALWAY r
DORSET
Q a
0 J 2
O a N. m r
O w
J
a
m w 1 v 2 O LN.
Q C7 J 1' � J
DORSET LN.
>
a
O
w Q z ti� CONWAY
za
o Z AV.
a
U
BAKER ST. 4
m
r
ALLEY #44 ALLEY #45
DALE WY. o
z �
LOGAN AV. a
w
U
z
J
O
'w
PAULARINO CHANNEL
.
�
J
a
VILLAGE WY.
w
w
o
U
a z n
z C7
W
EY #29
w
U
w
m z
�
J
w Q
EL CAMINO
}
Y
w
0
O ADAMS AV.
w
U d
=
m
m
Q
�
w
C
Z
O
w
�
O
�
SALVADOR ST.
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION MAP
STREET REHABILITATION LOCATIONS
Page 2 of 5
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
CANNONADIE
E
5
WNN U N DAMASCUS
OEEQDN Pv SANTA ROSA AV.
W1u' SPN JOSE LLEJO SIR MENNEN&Q RQ
_ SECRETARIAT SIR. �p
a
G
gSAN PABLO CIR. BEGONIA Al.
DANIELLE DR. J CARNATION AV.
SANT CRUZ CIR. � a
g
� DEBRA DR. SAUNAS AV,
POPPY CIR. JASMINE
ROCUS
SAUNAS AV. _ w Y
��� w N ornnR'OCK DR. 3-E g
DAHLIA AV.
4
III
CHARLESTON ST.
CARSON T.
ANANA PL.
MACKENZIE PL.
HARTFORD W.
N2 PEACE PL.
TRENTON WY. 1G
0
AUSTIN ST. CHEVEN NE ST.F O,y 2L LIARD
A ST. SPRINGFIELD SPP
T.
O Y
z g d — LANSING LN. T 9
A WY. PAULARINO 4 a <
D
PAU LARINO All
ga a DENVER DR.
IRSET LN. 3 AL NY S < w
3 ANNA 0 IS ST � HELENA CIR,
BAKER ST. m
a z ✓i p ---, ON UR.
z wI ALLEY fi122
¢ z < F VALENCIA ST.
EL CAMINO pR. / a SO NO RA
ALLEY 123
HuosoN ay. \
ALLEGHENY AV.
PLATTE DR.
S O
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION MAP
STREET REHABILITATION LOCATIONS
0 SLURRY LOCATIONS
Page 3 of 5
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
TEWINKLE
@R
COSTA MESA STO
PARK C
Al
BARKPARK
fPf
ARLINGTON AV. P
WELLESLEY
DR.O
LN.
3 S
FAIR DR. CSq
C'I!
ALLEY 46
�Z LII CLEARBROOK LN.
CIR. Of( Pe
PO 3 .y9R OL X05
41 9L fT@ J0 ''fy9
0 9} QR
DARTI 0 TH ( CCY ( yT
COLLEGE PARK CTO
j PL
TULANE R0, PL.
�ps?
rods ro 205
AMHERST RD. PL yTf PJ Ly9 �JZ PP ST O°s
Li 4, C yH Pp C p Op 4.
y
pP? f p
REST
5
Op �2 cc ?Oh
3Py 3J OJ`
Ly 9
CO
,1
F J O
o pV1P ��
� C 4P Sfq
VISTA
M O N I STA
A, nTI®SEI I
pp
2° 2
2380
ST, P P�
Q P2
fRT LfR9
°°
C<
2 O
2y0 ! .`.20'r �p C} yTJr f9C
v R� ti� OT J. yfR Rf °22
pJpP Q � PP2P fC, 2°5 �.' P
Cgly P2 C,�, �vOS
Jp�
pS0 T yf y0P 09�y .�,fA �"
Q° LCip C. L
P o l f'L
2pJ' �FRR Liy.9�yC� yOP p��
< 9 2
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION MAP
STREET REHABILITATION LOCATIONS
SLURRY LOCATIONS
Page 4 of 5
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
MESA P�
SCOTT PL.
PARK
DQ
1 STH ST. 0
�
J J
w JAMES ST.
z
Uo O
g PARK DR. Q� O
a
w w PARK D FST
� SHALIMAR DR. U
O ST
SHALIMAR DR.
NEWTON WY
> . TERMINAL WY. Qv �� eQj�
a Q� �O
J `rT
~ PO
w �O�
g
w 17TH
z ST
o
o q<<F
C)
w
FARAD ST. �6TjY �
Q
PJ. ST O ��ti
OHMS �JQ r�
J JO
Ov PJ.
Q�
Qom GQ, q
S
- 4�
Pte�Fy HiQ FSP
q( S P
9 ( TP
-11F /rvo A �P
T
C)
�y ST
C� 66, Pte' P��PO
�
OSTq �FY �Oti
��O
� q
2iFSq 69 •oC.
C��TS
cy �
TST �A
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION MAP
STREET REHABILITATION LOCATIONS
Page 5 of 5
ATTACHMENT 3
City of Costa Mesa, CA
FUTURE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PROJECTS
Active Transportation Projects
Merrimac Way - Cycle Tracks and Road Diet
Paularino Channel Trail
Street Improvement Projects
Fairview Road HSIP Improvements lAdams Avenue Baker Street
Harbor Boulevard/South Coast Drive Intersection Improvements
Newport Boulevard Widening Project 119th Sreet 117th Street
Wilson Street Widening Project College Avenue Fairview Road
Traffic Operations Projects
Baker Street/Babb Street Traffic Signal Modification Project
Baker Street/Randolph Avenue New Traffic Signal
Bear Street Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
Fairview Road Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
Fariview Road/Arlington Drive Traffic Signal Modification Project
Victoria Street/Pomona Avenue Traffic Signal Modification Project
Other Projects
Active Transportation Plan
Citywide Way Finding Signage Program
1-405 Widening Project
Traffic Impact Fee Update
City of Costa Mesa, CA
Future Street Improvement Projects
Alley 018
19th St
19th St
Alley 039
Nutmeg PI
Baker St
Alley 059
16th St
Fullerton Ave
S'ly end
Alley 082
Alley 083
Alley 112
Fullerton Ave
Orange Ave
MPAH (Arterials/Collectors)
Adams Ave
Begin of Bridge at River
Harbor Blvd
Bear St
On/Off Ramps SR -73 SB
Baker St
Bear St
Yukon/Paularino Ave
S'ly Edge of Bridge over 1-405
Fairview Rd
S'ly edge of Bridge over 1-405
Arlington Dr
Merrimac Way
Harbor Blvd
Fairview Rd
Placentia Ave
Victoria St
Production PI (s/o 16th St)
South Coast Dr
650' w/o Harbor Blvd
Harbor Blvd
Sunflower Ave
Cadillac Ave
Hyland Ave
Locals
Avocado St
College Ave
Fairview Rd
Bay St
Meyer PI
Maple Ave
California St
Minnesota Ave
Nevada Ave
Ford Rd
Harbor Blvd
Newport Blvd
Meyer PI
19th St
Hamilton St
Monrovia Ave
n/o 16th St (City Limits)
19th St
Parson St
Bernard St
Bay St
Pomona Ave
19th St
Victoria St
Raleigh Ave
Hamilton St
Cul-de-sac
Superior Ave
400' n/o E. 17th St
18th St
Thurin St
Bay St
Victoria St
Page 1 of 2
City of Costa Mesa, CA
Future Street Improvement Projects
SLURRY LOCATIONS:
20th St
Placentia Ave
Pomona Ave
Anaheim Ave
19th St
Bay St
Arnold Ave
Beach St
Cove St
Avalon St
Avocado St
Wilson St
Beach St
Arnold Ave
Meyer PI
Bernard St
Maple Ave
Harbor Blvd
Bernard St
Harbor Blvd
E'ly end
California St
Gisler Ave
Minnesota Ave
California St
New Hampshire Dr (S'ly BCR)
Iowa St (N'ly BCR)
Charle St
Bernard St
Hamilton St
College Ave
S'ly end
Victoria St
Cove St
Arnold Ave
Meyer PI
Doctors Cir
Cul-de-sac
Victoria St
Hamilton St
Placentia Ave
Charle St
Hamilton St
Harbor Blvd
Cul-de-sac
Knowell PI
Meyer PI
Maple Ave
Maple Ave
19th St
Hamilton St
Parson St
S'ly end
Victoria St
Pomona Ave
Victoria St
Wilson St
Ralcam PI
Cul-de-sac
Thurin St
Ross St
Arnold Ave
Meyer PI
Rutgers Dr
Avocado St
Wilson St
Seal St
Arnold Ave
Meyer PI
Sterling Ave
Hamilton St
Cul-de-sac
Sterling Ave
300' w/o Pomona Ave
Pomona Ave
Surf St
Arnold Ave
Meyer PI
Victoria PI
Newport Blvd
Victoria St
Wallace Ave
19th St
Hamilton St
Wallace Ave
Hamilton St
Cul-de-sac
Yorkshire St
Anahiem Ave
Maple Ave
Page 2 of 2
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
SCENIC AV. LAKE CENTER
3
°Rp
NTp
Wy
{f
SUNFLOWER AV.
SyN
�P R
N F�qy
y9W9/
• LASKA
A&,
2 44
5�
NEW HAMPSHIRE DR.
' ANNING, FHANNE
o
vrO2
T2 5 MISSOURI
/p
• f. ENT CKY 4 n q
y T
PL 9
T
HIS
_
fJ PL
o} ,RFW IWN015 ST NEW E <1C0 T.a CHARLES W.
JERSEY J TEWINKLE SAN DIEGO
ST. 4D5
2� 2 - G�CALIFORNIA
2F 3 2 _ TEX CIR
w
GISLER AV. GISLER
AV.
Q
MADAG AN ST.
CPQE .2a GARLINGFORD ST.
9N9y ��qI,ITIII,Im
KILLYBROOKE
'1419/C9 FQ'P JOP ALLEY #31 �2
h
CORIANDER ❑R. " STONEFIEL
D�
p m ePp�T P�Qy ALLEY X32 GATE
SST PQM CARAWAY DR. PL.
PATO � HAMRO K CpNW
OPC qy
Z Q,P o� a � � 22 W9TSON
J
9y
CAPRI Gy PQ a
,p WINTERGREEN PL NUTMEG P ys
CIRALLEY #38
CORSICA PL GALWAY >c
d L � Y
P m W
� Y �
P 3 2
2
RO P
FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION MAP
STREET REHABILITATION LOCATIONS
SLURRY LOCATIONS
Page 1 of 4
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
SAN DIEGO -0 FREEWAY
A,.
GISLER
AV.
LONDONDERRY ST
GARLINGFORD ST.
J
KILLYBROOKE g o
� CONCORD ST.
CHARLESTON S1.
CARSON ST.
HARTFORD WY.
"BOISE WY.
EY #31
S
�E."
_
"
¢ _ _
ADDED DR."'
STO NEFIELD ST.
p TRENTON WY.
DISMARK WY. -
? D
MC CORMACK LN.
BELFAST AV.
AUSTIN ST
#32 � DATE
WAY DR, ENUT.E.
- a
AM RO
CCNNq ARNELL
2 9TS0N
9RDONEGAGREEN
CHEYENNE STS h
AUGUSTA ST. 3 SPRINGFIELD ST.
w G
LANSING LN.
A LANTA WY. PADLARIND d
PL.
ALLEY #38
n
GALWAY o
J DORSET
W o LN.
3
DORSET w.
¢
a
DENVER DR.
-
AL NY 5
H
BAKER ST.
AV
"
� -
BAK
u
ALLEY III ALLEY #45 i
3
DALE WV.
3
LOGAN All -
E
PANUPoNO CHANNEL
POST
ST.
VILLAGE WV.
a
ALLEY 120
MISSION D,.
z z w ? ALLEY 122
3o
ALLEY #29
VALENCIA ST.
EL CAMINO DR.
_
ADAMS AV.
SA ST.
ALLEY 123
S
CORONA LN. CN
v' GRa
LM ST
v,
SALVADOR ST.
s
CO
RDNgO
00
R
3 5
SERRA WY.
ORANGE COAST
COLLEGE
PRESI DIO S0. PRESI DIO DR
MESA VERDE DR. EAST
>
TEWINKLE
g
MERRIMAC WY.
HANOVER DR.
CGSTAMIMESA
ARLINGTON AV.
FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION MAP
STREET REHABILITATION LOCATIONS
SLURRY LOCATIONS
Page 2 of 4
North
N.T.S.
ME
WY.
CITY OF COSTA MESA
Public Services/ Engineering
fo
IABD
SPRINGFIELD ST. �F22
F
S
wNswc w. l
IM150.11M
Hl1DSON AV.
ALLEGHENY AV.
Pw E DR.
s o z
m PAD RINO V
JENNIFER LN.
RANDOLPH AV.
PARER ST.
P
o�
a
S7 cviR sa
ir
ALLEY 122 rx � 1�1 � �
VALENCIA ST. SANTIAGO RD.
ALLEY 123 ¢ SONORA
ZSONO RA RD.
SAN
OR9 R 2
s uy �n
ST 2 5
4�
oy
CGa J A CR �
o �'oDN _ oaLN fRo oR�.
CORTEZ ST.
w SERRA WY.
TEWINKLE
SP
0
PARK
1S
.LVD.
ulnae
STDRGEON
PIERPONT DR. /
FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION MAP
STREET REHABILITATION LOCATIONS
Page 3 of 4
North CITY OF COSTA MESA
N.T.S. Public Services/ Engineering
I
WILSON ST. %IISO"1 4.
a rtIIIIIIIT
IILJJIlIL50I1N
CAPITAL ST.
WIIIII
L'
5
S _
3 SENATE ST,
11-5
LAVAST.
_
CONGRESS ST, CONGRESS ST,
GOVERNOR ST. a
VICTORIA ST,
VICTORIA ST.
w
IT,
PLUM
pL
PINE
PL
RALCAM PL.
_
3 � 220
HAMILTON ST. HAMILTON ST.
-
Tip -2
,P PJQP Q
0
KNOWELL PL,
REA CENTER
_
POA
=4 0
P
STERLING AV.
g
BAY ST. BAY ST. 4�e0
:-T1'
COVE ST. YORKSHIRE
C
ST. u
ST,
20TH S . SEAL 5f. - PJ
ALLEY #40 f.
ROSS ST
- FORD RD. � 'ST 90 9L
EEN PL
T
S
SURF ST.
n Y }
ALLEY X41 (�
SR,
_
_ ^ BERNARD ST _ _ JP
a BEACH ST.
w � -BERNARD GT. H
^'yl
ALLEY #124 ALLEY �1B a Jy Lb
19TH ST. a 19TH ST. P
C:rJ P P h
`b sfq�
sS
PLl1MER ST. PLUMER ST. Y r
ALLEY {rfi �g ,a
WELLO DR. CENTER ST.¢ CK
_ COSTA(
MESA P (-
ALLEY 1Y�
CENTER ST.
TOWNE ST.
SCOTT PL 5 PARK
18TH ST.
18TH S1.
JAMES CT.
gPARK DR.
SHALI ANPARK D SrfR (7-.cn8
OR
_
17TH ST,
S
SHALIMAR
9 OOS
NEWTON WY. TERMINAL WY.
17TH ST.
� Ty yti? yfSr Sl 'psO
Sr yS4 � sT fp
i
FARAD ST, 6Ty r�P�P 93.
OHMS
16TH ST.
0 ( F
p' O
!VOLS O �y S zP4
gt sr er 'c} '@
Lars STy � S Ty 28 �
��J
r} rl 2 ST
( 0 0
FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION MAP
STREET REHABILITATION LOCATIONS
SLURRY LOCATIONS
Page 4 of 4
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR CC -1
WARRANT INFORMATION 12/05/17
Payment
Date
Remittance to:
Remittance
Payment
Explanation of payment
Ref.
ID:
Amount
0208109
11/17/17
KTM Enterprises Inc. -
0000025258
$28,684.94
What was this for?
Furnishing & Installing bullet
This was for the purchase & installation o
the bulletproof glass at the PD's front desk.
This is payment 1 of 2. The second payment
covers the replacement of the lobby'
stairwell & main hallway entrance.
0208151
11/17/17
County of Orange -
0000003486
$1,252.00
What is this for?
Teletype Service for October
This is our monthly payment for teletype
2017
services through the OCSD, which provide
us connectivity to DOJ & other stat
agencies for missing persons, stolen
vehicles, etc.
0208195
11/17/17
Mobile Concrete -Sidewalk
0000025560
$355.57
What was this for? Why only one location?
Replacement - 920
Maintenance Services rents a one yard
Coronado
concrete mixer for small sidewalk projects,
when needed. This rental was for this on
location.
0207955
11/24/17
Integrated Impressions - CM
0000003403
$5,667.70
What does NRPA stand for and what are w
Promotional items -
buying from them?
Promotional Items - NRPA
NRPA stands for the National Recreation an
Prog Promotional Items
Park Association. The promotional items for
the Parks & Community Services Department
were for the Healthy Out of School Program
that was paid for by a grant. The items were
for approximately 900 ROCKS Program
articipants and included, reusable water
bottles, eco -friendly grocery/tote bags,
exercise headbands/wristbands, shirts an
branded writing utensils. The other C
promotional items were for handouts an
promotional items used at City events.
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR CC -6
CITY OF COSTA MESA
€
.- _
SLS,' _ {i
Public Services Department/Administration
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: RAJA SETHURAMAN, PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR
DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 2017
SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING EVALUATION
Over the past few months, staff has received complaints about the effectiveness of the street
sweeping program. These complaints included the quality of street sweeping, missed routes, as well
as lack of enforcement of parking during street sweeping.
in order to review these complaints, Maintenance Services Division staff recently conducted a street
sweeping survey to examine the efficiency of CleanStreet's sweeping services. Staff conducted the
survey by performing a "stick test". The stick test is done by writing the date on a small wooden stick
and placing it on street sweeping routes, prior to the street being swept. This is done without
informing the street sweeping operators or the CleanStreet organization. Several routes a day are
tested at random locations. This ensures that all of the street sweeping operators are tested. If the
street is swept property the stick will have been removed by the street sweeper. Before and after
photos are taken of each location.
These tests were conducted on October 10th, 11th, 12th, and 17th, on the following streets:
s 399 Bay Street - Posted for street sweeping —Tuesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
• 358 Hamilton Street - Posted for street sweeping — Tuesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:100 a.m.
• 281 Republic Avenue - Posted for street sweeping -Tuesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
. 399 Bay Street - Posted for street sweeping - Tuesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
w 970 Grove Place - Posted for street sweeping - Tuesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
A 932 State Street - A non -posted street swept on Tuesdays.
• 886 Joann Street - Posted for street sweeping — Tuesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
• 1830 Wallace Ave. - Posted for street sweeping - Wednesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
• Across from 681 Plummer St. - Posted for street sweeping - Wednesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00
a.m.
• Across from 188 E. 1911 St. - Posted for street sweeping — Wednesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00
a.m.
. 166 E. 20th Street - Posted for street sweeping — Wednesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
183 Bay Street - Posted for street sweeping — Wednesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
• 264 Cabrillo Street - Posted for street sweeping - Wednesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
® Across from 422 Broadway -Posted for street sweeping -Wednesdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
770 Shalimar Avenue - A non -posted street swept on Thursdays, is all red curb.
• 740 Shalimar Avenue - A non -posted street swept on Thursdays, is all red curb.
2426 Orange Avenue - Posted for street sweeping — Thursdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
• 2348 Santa Ana Avenue -Posted for street sweeping —Thursdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
• 209 Tulane Place - Posted for street sweeping — Thursdays, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
• 216 Loyola Road - Posted for street sweeping - Thursdays, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
• 1909 Whittier Avenue - Posted for street sweeping - Tuesdays, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
• 980 Grove Place - Posted for street sweeping — Tuesdays, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
• 1932 Anaheim Avenue - Posted for street sweeping — Tuesdays, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
• 580 Yorkshire Street - Posted for street sweeping — Tuesdays, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
• 2220 Continental Street - Posted for street sweeping — Tuesdays, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
2270 Miner Street - Posted for street sweeping - Tuesdays, 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Staff then returned later in the day on the test dates to inspect gutters to check if all of the wooden
sticks had been removed and the gutters were cleaned. Occasionally a couple spots were missed
due to parked vehicles in the street. Photographs were taken before and after street sweeping.
The results of the survey showed that CleanStreet is performing the sweeping of residential routes
on schedule. Debris is being removed from the gutters and curb lines per the specifications of the
contract and meeting City standards. The inspections also showed that ample water was being used
on all routes, which effectively minimizes dust. The total amount of debris removed on an annual
basis by CleanStreet is higher than previous years when street sweeping was conducted by in-house
resources.
Additionally, CleanStreet utilizes a program called Zonar, which tracks all sweepers through a GPS
system enabling City staff in verifying swept routes, speed of travel and water usage. This is an
important resource that assists staff in responding to concerns or complaints.
The evaluation and daily inspections by staff found that CleanStreet was indeed doing the job as
specified in the contract and their overall job performance meets expectations. The CleanStreet
organization has been very cooperative when asked for additional services and they address City's
concerns in a professional and timely manner.
The largest impact to the quality of street sweeping seems to be vehicles parked in the street on
both posted and non -posted routes during street sweeping hours. This continues to be the
predominant issue when identifying deficiencies in the City's street sweeping program. Staff has
initiated a parking solutions committee which included representatives from several divisions include
Transportation, Planning, Police, and City Manager's Office. The enforcement issues and street
sweeping concerns are reviewed in a cooperative manner and there is ongoing coordination to
improve enforcement actions. Maintenance staff will continue to monitor street sweeping operations
to ensure contract compliance.
Attachments
Tom Hatch, City Manager
Tamara Letourneau, Assistant City Manager
Rob Sharpnack, Police Chief
Bruce Lindemann, Maintenance Superintendent
r
STREET
SWEEPING
PHOTOGRAPHS
»moi• '•�_
aL�•.`. •� �-
L*7 qa4m6.j ,
,.e..r
353 HAMILTON STREET
BEFORE
AFTER SAO TQM Sq.
�S
1830 WALLACE STREET
BEFORE
a
t
LI
AilM�y
AFTER
216 LOYOLA ROA®
BEFORE
�p94
i
Oct 17, 2017, 9:45:36)
580 YORKSHIRE AVENUE
BEFORE
i `QiT11 Mfr9
�ia�
E ;
171
17. 2017
All = a
't
F1
17. 2017.
1
n
L
Oct 17. 2017
MS4*i r 0
•.
i
-
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR PH -1
OVERVIEW
OF CURRENT
FRANCHISE &
PERMITS
• Multi -Family
Complexes (5 or more
units) and Commercial
Businesses
• Non -Exclusive Waste
Hauling Franchise (A Tier
and B Tier) — 24 Haulers
• Construction and
Demolition Permit Tracking
System
qu
12/05/2017
1
WASTE HAULING FRANCHISE TIMELINE
Several Municipal Code Revisions by Ordinance and Resolution
Key City Council Meetings:
• November 2004
• Established Solid Waste Non -Exclusive Franchise
• August 2010
• Authorized a Construction and Demolition Debris Tracking System
• December 2010
• Established Administrative Penalties for Waste Hauling Permit
Requirements for Construction Projects
IN
WHY CHANGE?
1. New State Monitoring and Reporting Regulations
• 2016 CALGreen Building Code
• Expands the number and type of projects the City is
required to administer, monitor, and report on to the State
• Does not provide a dollar value limitation for permits
subject to the State's monitoring and reporting
regulations
• Increased landfill diversion of 65% on a per -project basis
2. Not making changes could subject City up to $10,000
in daily fines and Non -Compliance with CalRecycle
3. Contractors cannot Self -Haul legally in Costa Mesa
and need to address ongoing Illegal Hauling
,W)
N
12/05/2017
2
12/05/2017
LEGALIZE AND MONITOR CONTRACTOR
SELF -HAUL
• Contractor Self -Haul — ability for contractors to haul the materials
they generate from their primary business activity (lower cost
than a third -party waste hauler)
• Elimination of B -Tier of City's Franchise
• Cost Effective
• Provides City information to track the waste generated from
each project
• 23,557.60 tons out of approximately 100,000 tons illegally
hauled by non -franchised hauling activity to Orange County
Landfills
• Abbreviated Permit Process — requires list of vehicles contractor
wish to use and the City be listed as additional insured on
insurance policy 60
LEGALIZE AND MONITOR CONTRACTOR
SELF -HAUL
CONTRACTOR SELF -HAUL PERMIT
Permit Fee $610 $200
Pre -Payment of $10,000 (A -Tier) None
Franchise Fees $1,500 (B -Tier)
Percentage of Revenue 16% None
from Gross Receipts
5200 Permit Fee covers:
• Wear and tear on City's roadway
• Staff Time to Review Insurance and Vehicles
• Staff time to Track annual Self -Hauler Contractorsup
LEGALIZE AND MONITOR CONTRACTOR
SELF -HAUL
PER -PROJECT PERMIT
• Required by all Self -Haul Contractors for each permitted job
• Contractors required to submit hauling receipts and a one-
page report to substantiate waste diversion
• Contractors that opt to use City Franchised Waste Hauler
avoid per -project fees and reporting requirements
WWI
12/05/2017
11
PER -PROJECT PERMIT FEE MATRIX
$20,000 or less $160
$20,001 through $100,000 $160 $3 $1,000 $20,000 Or fraction
thereof
$100,001 through $500,000 $400 $2 $1,000 $100,000 Or fraction
thereof
$500,001 or more $960 $0.50 $1,000 $500,000 Orfraction
thereof
• Developed by Building, Public Services, and Finance
• Cover's the City's administrative costs in tracking and reporting
on Contractors' waste hauling and diversion activities
• Cost Effective
• Limits valuation manipulation by Applicant
• Addresses permits with multiple scopes of work eo
BIN CONFISCATION - DETER ILLEGAL
HAULING
• Bin Confiscation — effective and low-cost measure to minimize
illegal hauling
• Employed in Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley
• 48-hour 1st Notice
• 24-hour Notice for Repeat Offenders
• Bin Confiscated by Contracted Hauler
• Economic Incentive — Bins cost approximately $3,000
• City fine not -to -exceed $1,000 including disposal fee, impound
fee, and City's administrative fee
• Forfeiture of this equipment to the contracting hauler satisfies
City collection costs — no City financial obligations
12/05/2017
5
12/05/2017
ESTABLISH ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES
• Unfunded mandates
• AB 939 Provides Cities with the ability to Develop and
Implement Fees to Recoup Program Costs
• Need administrative enforcement for compliance efforts to
have an effective program— - — -
Proposed Penalties:
1. $150 for each calendar month that a required tonnage report
from a franchised hauler is late — Required Quarterly
2. Three -times the project fee for failure by an approved self -
haul contractor to submit required weight tickets and
diversion reporting forms
3. Two-times the project fee for failure by an approved hauler to
meet 65% diversion of construction and demolition waste
4. $1,000 impound fee for illegally placed solid waste collection®
containers confiscated
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED
CHANGES
• The City receives approximately $2 million in Franchise
Revenue annually
• Proposed Code Changes are Revenue Neutral
1. Elimination of B -Tier Franchise (CY 2016 $61,123.31
Revenue)
• $61,123.31 is from B -Tier Permit, Franchise Fees, and
non-refundable Pre -Payments
2. Establish Contractor Self -Haul Permit (Projected Minimum
Revenue of $52,584)
• Revenue projected from Pool/Spa and Roofing Projects
only
• Anticipate Increased revenues by reducing illegally hauling
• Requested letters of support
from:
• Building Industry Association
• Chamber of Commerce
• CalRecycle Support
• 11/8 Finance & Pension Advisory
Committee
PUBLIC
OUTREACH & ' Public Notice 15 Days Before
12/5 City Council Meeting
UPCOMING
DATES • 12/5 City Council Meeting —
Public Hearing
• 1/2/18 City Council Meeting — Auk
Public Hearing
12/05/2017
7
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS
FOR PH -2
REVIEW OF PA -17-36 (OCHS)
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR PH -2
TRAYLOR, MARIAN
From:
GREEN, BRENDA
Sent:
Wednesday, November 29, 2017 11:47 AM
To:
TRAYLOR, MARIAN
Subject:
FW; OC Humane Society Kennel Permit
Attachments:
1-11-17 Inspection Form.pdf; March 28, 2017 Violation Letter.pdf; 5-3-17 Inspection
Form.pdf; Memo - OCHS.PDF; IMG_0854 jpg; IMG_0902 - Copyjpg; ISOLATION 18
(1) jpg; WARD C K38 (2) - Copyjpg; WARD D K58 (1) jpg; OCHS 2016 - 2017 audit-
recommend ations.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
Categories: Red Category
For red folders, thank you.
Brenda Green
City Clerk
City of Costa Mesa
7141754-5221
E-mail correspondence with the City of Costa Mesa (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and
as such may, therefore, be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the act. Note: Using the "Reply All" option
may inadvertently result in a Brown Act violation.
From: SHARPNACK, ROBERT
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 11:32 AM
To: GREEN, BRENDA<brenda.green@costamesaca.gov>
Cc: MANLEY, MARK <MMAN LEY@costamesaca.gov>
Subject: FW: OC Humane Society Kennel Permit
Brenda,
As discussed this morning, please print this email and include with the attached OCHS 2016-2017 audit
recommendations for the red folders.
Thanks,
Robert N. Sharpnack I Chief of Police
City of Costa Mesa I Police Department
Phone 714.754.5117 1 Fax 714.754.5002
rs�nack costamesac.._a.clav
LO
This e-mail transmission, as well as any attached documents, is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may
contain confidential information that is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC Sections 2510-2521). if you are not the intended
I
recipient (or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any copying, disclosure or
distribution of this information is strictly prohibited.
From: SHARPNACK, ROBERT
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 5:45 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <CITYCOUNCIL@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us>
Cc: HATCH, THOMAS <THOMAS.HATCH @costamesaca.gov>
Subject: FW: OC Humane Society Kennel Permit
"Please Do Not Reply To All"
Mayor and Council Members,
In December 2016, the Orange County Humane Society applied for its annual kennel permit through Orange County
Animal Care. In January 2017, OC Animal Care conducted a corresponding inspection at the OC Humane Society site.
During the visit, deficiencies were noted and identified for correction.
On Wednesday morning (8/09), an OC Animal Care representative contacted Tom Hatch regarding the status of OC
Humane Society's kennel permit. He expressed concern and forwarded several documents (attached) which detail
factual circumstances observed at the OC Humane Society during inspections. Tom and I subsequently participated in a
conference call during which we learned among other things, the details of a deceased parakeet. The parakeet died back
in May, while housed at the OC Humane Society. As a result of these concerns, OC Animal Care expressed their intent to
deny OC Humane Society's request for the annual kennel permit. The denial is to take place after a 60 -day period.
However, the OC Humane Society has a right of appeal, which must be exercised in the first 30 -days. Without a valid
kennel license, OC Humane Society cannot operate as a shelter. Tom inquired about the potential for a temporary
contract with the County. However, they stated that was not possible, as it would violate their contracts with other
member cities.
Wednesday afternoon, Captain Manley and Lieutenant Bakkila responded to the OC Humane Society to check the noted
deficiencies and overall conditions at the shelter. Afterward, they advised all noted deficiencies appeared to be
corrected and the facility appeared clean and orderly.
Today, Tom, myself, the Garden Grove City Manager and Deputy City Manager met with Dr. Butros at the OC Humane
Society. Dr. Butros received the letter from OC Animal Care officially denying his permit. Dr. Butros expressed his intent
to appeal the decision and stated all deficiencies have been corrected. Per policy OC Animal Care had a police report
taken and asked the District Attorney's Office to review the circumstances surround the death of the parakeet. To better
clarify order of events, I have asked Lieutenant Bakkila to complete a detailed chronology outlining the events as they
occurred and information regarding corrections.
Rest assured, we take this matter very seriously and will keep you apprised of any new information. For further
background and relevant information, I am forwarding Captain Manley's informational email below. If you have any
additional questions, do not hesitate to ask.
Regards,
Robert N. Sharpnack I Chief of Police
City of Costa Mesa I Police Department
Phone 714.754.5117 1 Fax 714.754.5002
rsharpnack costamesaca q,ev
This e-mail transmission, as well as any attached documents. is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may
contain confidential information that is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC Sections 2510-2521). If you are not the intended
recipient (or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any copying, disclosure or
distributlon of this Information is strlctly prohibited.
From: MANLEY. MARK
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:25 PM
To: SHARPNACK, ROBERT <RSHARPNACK@costamesaca.gov>
Subject: FW: OC Humane Society Kennel Permit
Chief,
Yesterday, City staff received the below email from the OC Community Resources regarding the decision to deny Orange
County Humane Society's (OCHS) kennel renewal application at this time. This was prompted by prior inspection
violations noted by OC Animal Care and an incident of an animal death investigation, which involved a deceased
parakeet in the custody of OCHS that was discovered by OC Animal Care in May of this year. OCHS will remain open for
at least the next 60 days pending a potential appeals process for the kennel renewal application (please see email below
by Director Dylan Wright).
The purpose of my email is to address the recent OC Animal Care inspection and provide background context as to how
the Police Department has been working with OCHS to continually improve facility conditions. Speaking with our staff
and based on my observations, I feel we are moving in a positive direction that provides the best possible animal shelter
services for our community.
Upon receiving the below email yesterday, I called and spoke with the representative from OC Animal Care who
performed inspections of OCHS over the last several months. The last completed inspection was on May 3rd and
detailed two deficient areas for correction. These involved adding perches to some of the cat kennels on site and
providing additional lighting to certain dog kennels. As a result, yesterday, Lt. Vic Bakkila and I went to OCHS to
personally walk the facility, review the noted areas for correction and provide a spot -inspection of the overall facility. Lt.
Bakkila and I verified that previous deficiencies had been corrected. Furthermore, the personnel staffing on site and the
overall cleanliness of the facility and animals being kept there was excellent.
Prior to the above-mentioned May 31d inspection, OC Animal Care conducted two previous inspections this year. The
first inspection on January 11th noted five items for correction. Some of these items were rectified rather quickly. An
issue of cat kennel configurations with perches required an entirely new purchase of several new kennels. This was later
accomplished and cats were relocated away from dogs into climate -controlled rooms. As a result of the city of Garden
Grove's new contract with OCHS in January, we saw a significant influx of cats and the purchase and relocation of
additional new cat kennels was required.
The March 21" inspection largely observed a "buildup of grime' and maintenance repairs within some of the dog
kennels, in addition to a procedural issue of temporarily housing dogs in a shortened dog run kennel away from food
and water. The sanitation and the procedural housing issues were immediately corrected by OCHS volunteer staff.
At this time, we feel OCHS has addressed all of the previously noted OC Animal Care deficiencies for correction.
Background
To provide further background, in early 2016, the Costa Mesa Police Department initiated an audit and action -plan to
address concerns at that time. The attached OCHS 2016-2017Audit & Recommendations document provides those
action -items for your review.
In doing so, we initiated efforts to improve the conditions and quality of life for our animals by conducting reoccurring,
informal inspections of OCHS by our Police Department Animal Control Officer (ACO) staff. Inspections include
cleanliness of kennels, identifying other potential health issues, and ensuring the proper care and feeding of
animals. Inspections occur as ACO workloads allow. ACO staff continues to remain engaged with OCHS and issues are
promptly addressed when observed. Since June 2017, the frequency of OCHS site inspections by ACO staff has
increased significantly with the filling of a vacant full-time ACO position (vacant since 2016), as well as the filling of a
brand new part-time ACO position that is charged with daily shelter liaison responsibilities. Additionally, I have
discussed with Public Affairs Manager Roxi Fyad opportunities to increase marketing of pets for adoption and other
services at OCHS to help bridge any communication gaps with our residents.
Later this month, Police Department ACO staff will begin training on the much anticipated Superion Animal Control
CAD/RMS reporting module. This was a $271< mid -year budget purchase that includes a direct interface with OCHS'
PetPoint software data management system. This will allow for greater accounting and reporting capabilities with
regard to OCHS.
Even with the Police Department's collaboration, there were still deficiencies noted in the attached county
inspections. According to the OC Animal Care representative I spoke with, sanitation and upkeep deficiencies are not
uncommon with other commercial Kennels and shelters under OC Animal Care jurisdiction. As evident in the totality of
corrections made subsequent to the May 3rd inspection, Police Department staff feels OCHS has made considerable
improvements. As an example, OCHS recently increased its number of Kennel attendants from three to five paid staff
members who cover 7 -days a week.
In January of 2017, OCHS contracted with the city of Garden Grove for animal shelter services. Costa Mesa averages 50-
60 impounded animals per month. Since January, it has been noted that Garden Grove brings in approximately two to
three times more impounded animals on a monthly basis than Costa Mesa. The Police Department recognizes Garden
Grove's presence has created increased workload challenges for OCHS staff. Not likely coincidental, OCHS began facing
many of the recent OC Animal Care inspection challenges upon Garden Grove joining OCHS. Police Department and
Garden Grove staff met earlier this morning to begin a collaborative and ongoing working group to address future
issues.
Proposed New OCHS Facility in Costa Mesa
Since late 2016, Lt. Bakkila has been working directly with Dr. Botros to locate a satellite facility that could cater
predominately to the care and convenience of Costa Mesa pets and residents. This past month, a property was located
at 642 Baker St. in Costa Mesa, the former site of Swift Slip Dock & Pier Builders (Map of 642 Baker St.). City Manager
Hatch, Lt. Bakkila, and I toured this facility and were very excited about the amenities and possibility for a shelter
located within our city. Dr. Botros subsequently began escrow last week. The property at 642 Baker is in a commercial
area and freeway accessible from other parts of Costa Mesa. Further, it has separate on site office space that Police
Department ACO staff could ideally occupy as a substation for increased oversight and access to the public. Intake,
redemptions and adoptions of Costa Mesa animals could all occur at this location. The Police Department
wholeheartedly solicits City Council's enthusiasm for this proposed project, if all goes as planned.
Conclusion
Police Department staff continues to work closely with OCHS, even more so with our full staffing of ACO personnel. Dr.
Botros continues to be responsive to course corrections. This includes his recent approval of City staff's request to
extend the pet holding period from five to seven days in order to allow Costa Mesa pet owners a longer period to
reclaim lost pets. Conversely, the apparent lack of care that likely caused the unfortunate deceased parakeet in May
and culminated in the denial of OCHS' Kennel renewal application is unequivocally unacceptable by all standards. In
conversation yesterday with Dr. Botros, he is committed to the application appeal process and continuing to work
alongside the Police Department and City staff. Continued collaboration and the pending purchase of a new OCHS
shelter facility within Costa Mesa provides an opportunity to increase the level of outstanding services moving
forward. I'm confident in the direction we are going.
If any City Council members have questions or concerns and/or would like a tour of the OCHS facility and operations,
myself and Lt. Bakkila would more than willing to do so at their convenience.
Sincerely,
MARK M. MANLEY I CAPTAIN
City of Costa Mesa I Police Department
Phone 714.754.5043 1 Fax 714.754.5002
From: HATCH, THOMAS
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 8:47 AM
To: SHARPNACK, ROBERT<RSHARPNACK@costamesaca.eov>; MANLEY, MARK <MMAN LEY@costamesaca.gov>;
BAKKILA, VICTOR <VBAKKILA@costamesaca.aov>; FYAD, ROM <RFYAD@costamesaca.gov>
Subject: FW: OC Humane Society Kennel Permit
From: Wright, Dylan[mailto:Dylan.Wrieht@occr.oceov.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 8:35 AM
To: HATCH, THOMAS <THOMAS.HATCH @costamesaca.gov>
Cc: Hawkins, Jennifer <Jennifer.Hawkins@occr.ocgov.com>
Subject: OC Humane Society Kennel Permit
Tom,
As discussed, attached are the inspection reports/notices issued by OC Animal Care to OC Humane Society for code
violations and the inspection report related to the animal death (cruelty investigation in process by DA). Representative
pictures are also included. Due to these ongoing issues, OCAC will be denying OC Humane's kennel application. There is
an appeals process and OC Humane can reapply for a permit at any time. That said, it will be incumbent upon OC
Humane to demonstrate the ability to comply with applicable codes before a permit can be issued.
Dr. Hawkins and I will call you at 9:30 this morning to discuss further.
Thank you,
Dylan
Dylan Wright
isDirector
OC Community Resources
1770 N. Broadway, 4th Floor
Santa Ana, CA 92706
Office: (714) 480-2788 1 Fax: 714-480-2899
5
2016 - 2017 Costa Mesa OCHS Audit and Recommendations Spreadsheet
Reported Non -Compliance Concerns
Initial Assessment of Audit Findings
Status Update —January 2017
1. Absence of dedicated full-time Shelter
Pending hiring/assignment of P/T ACO forjoint OCHS/CM
Mirna Metrey has been the full-time manager of the
Manager/Coordinator
duties.
OCHS shelter since December 2014. PD is processing
one part-time ACO who will be a shelter liaison, as
well bringing on one part-time office support person
to conduct reoccurring audits of shelter operations.
2. Vaccination & parasite control best
In compliance per ACO A. Rodriguez
Best practices are followed (refer to memo for
practices
detailed information)
3. Spay & neutering requirements at
In compliance per ACO A. Rodriguez
In compliance with Food & Agriculture Code section
adoption (per CA Food & Agricultural
30503 (refer to memo for detailed information).
Code)
4. No sanitation plan
Per ACO A. Rodriguez, OCHS follows HSUS (Humane
OCHS follows HSUS (Humane Society of US)
Society of US) guidelines for drainage, disease control,
guidelines for drainage, disease control, cleaning, etc.
cleaning, etc.
S. Proper record keeping and billing (per City
TBD. Planned assignment of P/T ACO w/ tablet
PD approves monthly invoicing, which goes to
agreement)
Finance. Last fee increase by OCHS was June 2015.
Per ACO staff, CM is properly receiving spay and
neuter fines and dog licensing fees from OCHS per
agreement (fees submitted to Finance); PD
personnel have been conducting reoccurring
inspections of the shelter, which will increase in
frequency with the part-time staff coming aboard.
6. Improper retention of adoption sales tax
Per S. Dunivent, HDL rep Robin Sturdivant advised sales
Last year, PD, Finance, and Dr. Botros' accountant
tax does not apply to adoption -related services for non-
had a conference call with the State of California BOE
profit organizations. OCHS staff claims it is"lawfully
to clarify the sales tax issue. The City was correct in
charging taxes" to public for adoptions (OCHS accountant
asserting that sales tax should not be collected on
claims this is lawfully being done).
animal adoptions. Since, OCHS no longer collects
sales taxes for animal adoptions.
Per ACO A. Rodriguez, CM is properly receiving spay and
neuter fines and dog licensing fees from OCHS per
agreement (fees submitted to CM Finance); adoption and
impound fees to be retained by OCHS.
7. 7 -day holds required per S. Genis, prior to
Per ACO A. Rodriguez, 5 -day adopt -outs (not including day
OCHS complies with CA Food & Agriculture Code
adopting out animals, but 5 -day adopt
animal brought in) are "lawfully" being done (Food &
31108. (refer to memo for detailed information).
outs are allegedly being done by OCHS in
Agriculture Code 31108(a)(1) / Impounding Period for
violation of statute.
Stray Dogs: 4 -day hold required, not including day animal
brought in).
8. Confirm OCHS properly registered and
Jones and Mayer attorney Ivy Tsai and Brittany Roberto
OCHS is registered as a 501 non-profit, state
current as "non-profit" organization, i.e.. i)
reviewing said documents ** Awaiting Dr. Botros'
identification #95-2225005.
990 tax forms (2012-14), and ii) By Laws
accountant Milad Saad to forward actual Articles of
and Articles of Incorporation.
Incorporation doc's for Ivy to review; awaiting reply from
Ivy Tsai.
9. CIP improvements to better address
Items awaiting itemized bid from Dr. Botros' architect.
Dr. Botros is currently seeking a satellite intake
shelter environment. Items discussed:
facility for City impounded animals. Lt. Bakkila has
- Extend cinderblock wall to physically
been working with Dr. Botros to identify a property
separate dog and cat kennel areas;
that offer space, amenities, and environment that
- Install additional ventilation hardware
will satisfy previous facility concerns. Each of the
in enclosed kennel area;
identified concerns should and will be addressed
- Install skylights for increased lighting;
once a new property facility is leased.
- Install security bars over louvered
windows for added security.
10. Tablet accessible site inspection
Provided form (templates/formats) intended to be stored
The Police Department received read-only access to
procedure; improved website features to
on tablet for use, i.e. monthly reports, annual LRCA
OCHS' PetPoint tracking software. More importantly,
assist with adoptions.
reports, etc.
the Police Department was recently approved to
purchase the SunGard CAD/RMS Animal Control
Enable "daily site log" (check off list) entries by CM ACO's
software module that will specifically manage and
tasked with daily inspections.
provide enhanced capabilities for animal control
calls -for -service documentation and reporting.
Additionally, this software will be integrated with
OCHS' PetPoint software to enable shared animal
impound data that will compile the most
comprehensive database for animals collected and
dispo'd by both the Police Department and OCHS.
November 29, 2017
City of Costa Mesa
City Council
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92628
RE." Opposition; Planning Application PA -17-36
Animal Shelter at 642 Baker St., Costa Mesa
Dear City Council:
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR PH -2
I 1'k4 MAil
I represent the owner of the neighboring property at 630-636 Baker St., Costa Mesa and I am the owner
of the adjacent business at 636 Baker St., Costa Mesa. The property was originally developed by my
grandparents. I have operated my property management business at this location for 25 years.
I understand the desire of the City staff to have an animal shelter within the city boundaries, but this is
not a suitable location for such a facility and I respectfully ask that you deny the proposed application.
Here are some of my concerns with the proposed application;
The dogs barking and other noises from the shelter would be materially detrimental to our
business, and would not allow us the quiet enjoyment of our property. Because our neighboring
properties share a zero lot line, the interior of my business is within one foot of where the
animals would be kept. I do not have confidence that any sound deadening measures will be
sufficient to completely remove the negative impact. We will most certainly hear the dogs barking
and other animal noises. We have already been troubled by the construction noise from Dr.
Botros' contractors working on the improvements they have begun.
The site parking provided is not sufficient for this use. Ten parking spaces including parking for
OCHS staff, animal control officers, and volunteers will not be sufficient for daily operations, let
alone public events like adoption fairs. Because there is no street parking on Baker and our
parking lot is adjacent to the building, visitors to the shelter will park in our parking lot. This has
already been proven by the use of our lot by the clients of previous businesses occupying the
property, and this would be worse. Visitors parking at neighboring properties is unacceptable and
the undue burden of "policing" this issue would unfairly fall on me and the other businesses in
our building.
3. The gate entrance to the property is narrow and its location is not obvious to those who are not
familiar with the address and are trying to find it. The shelter would bring more of this type of
traffic to the location and this is dangerous. We have already witnessed several accidents in front
of our property with the speed of traffic, and lack of traffic signals on Baker St., between Bristol
and the 55 freeway.
4. The location as developed is potentially dangerous for animals and the public. Should an animal
get off leash, it will likely run toward the open gate and into oncoming traffic on Baker St.
The site selection process is flawed. Based on my brief conversations with Lieutenant Bakkila, it
seems he was solely tasked with finding a suitable location for a new animal shelter. It was clear
to me within our first conversation, that he was not enjoying working on this project and
indicated that the sooner he could get this done and behind him the better. There was no
testimony in the planning commission meeting that any real estate professionals had been
retained to assist in the site selection process.
636 Baker Street Costa Mesa CA 92626 714 438 2244 PH 714 438 2246 Fx
M A N
L E
A
A
G E
s
M
I
E N T
N G
s A
L
E 5
I represent the owner of the neighboring property at 630-636 Baker St., Costa Mesa and I am the owner
of the adjacent business at 636 Baker St., Costa Mesa. The property was originally developed by my
grandparents. I have operated my property management business at this location for 25 years.
I understand the desire of the City staff to have an animal shelter within the city boundaries, but this is
not a suitable location for such a facility and I respectfully ask that you deny the proposed application.
Here are some of my concerns with the proposed application;
The dogs barking and other noises from the shelter would be materially detrimental to our
business, and would not allow us the quiet enjoyment of our property. Because our neighboring
properties share a zero lot line, the interior of my business is within one foot of where the
animals would be kept. I do not have confidence that any sound deadening measures will be
sufficient to completely remove the negative impact. We will most certainly hear the dogs barking
and other animal noises. We have already been troubled by the construction noise from Dr.
Botros' contractors working on the improvements they have begun.
The site parking provided is not sufficient for this use. Ten parking spaces including parking for
OCHS staff, animal control officers, and volunteers will not be sufficient for daily operations, let
alone public events like adoption fairs. Because there is no street parking on Baker and our
parking lot is adjacent to the building, visitors to the shelter will park in our parking lot. This has
already been proven by the use of our lot by the clients of previous businesses occupying the
property, and this would be worse. Visitors parking at neighboring properties is unacceptable and
the undue burden of "policing" this issue would unfairly fall on me and the other businesses in
our building.
3. The gate entrance to the property is narrow and its location is not obvious to those who are not
familiar with the address and are trying to find it. The shelter would bring more of this type of
traffic to the location and this is dangerous. We have already witnessed several accidents in front
of our property with the speed of traffic, and lack of traffic signals on Baker St., between Bristol
and the 55 freeway.
4. The location as developed is potentially dangerous for animals and the public. Should an animal
get off leash, it will likely run toward the open gate and into oncoming traffic on Baker St.
The site selection process is flawed. Based on my brief conversations with Lieutenant Bakkila, it
seems he was solely tasked with finding a suitable location for a new animal shelter. It was clear
to me within our first conversation, that he was not enjoying working on this project and
indicated that the sooner he could get this done and behind him the better. There was no
testimony in the planning commission meeting that any real estate professionals had been
retained to assist in the site selection process.
636 Baker Street Costa Mesa CA 92626 714 438 2244 PH 714 438 2246 Fx
Rather, it seems Lieutenant Bakkila saw a "for sale" sign when driving by, and Dr. Botros jumped
to purchase the property, with little consideration of whether it was appropriate for a shelter, or
how it would impact the neighbors. It is my experience that typically under similar circumstances,
a buyer would put the property into escrow with a contingency that the property be approved for
the buyer's intended use before the sale is completed. But in this case, I can only assume that
Dr. Botros was given assurances by staff that his use of the property would be approved by the
city, as he so quickly purchased the property before his use of the property was approved.
6. While standing in a group with my neighbors after the planning commission meeting, Lieutenant
Bakkila said that out of everyone in the group, it was the impact to me that he was most worried
about. If he is concerned about the impact to me and my business by the operation of the animal
shelter at this location, I think the planning commission should have been made aware of those
concerns, so they could be considered.
The timing to approve the shelter is also flawed. It seems appropriate that the animal services
committee should be in place and have the opportunity to weigh in on these important issues
before key decisions about the facility, location, and operator are determined. In light of the
opposition to continuing with OCHS to provide animal shelter services, moving forward to
approve a new shelter use directly with Dr. Botros less than two months before the current
contract expires and before the animal services committee has had the opportunity to participate
in the process, is inappropriate and premature.
8. The cover page of the applicant's plans clearly identifies the work area to include our property
and a portion of the neighbor's property to the North for additional parking. The plans as
submitted include numbered parking spaces of up to 32 parking spaces. The applicant will likely
say that this is simply a drafting error, but I have reason to believe that there are bigger plans
for this shelter than are being discussed openly with this application. Lieutenant Bakkila testified
in the planning commission meeting that he anticipates other cities will also bring their animals to
this location, which would make this a regional facility. In addition, the application provides that
veterinary services will be performed onsite, but there are no improvements/surgery rooms
shown on the plans to perform these services. I suspect it is the intention of the applicant and
possibly city staff that any future expansion of the shelter or related services will likely require
the use of our property and therein justify a hostile acquisition of our property. If in spite of the
opposition to this application, the council moves forward with the approval of the animal shelter
at this location, I ask that as a condition of approval, the City enter into an agreement that in no
case will the City take our property by hostile action for the operation, expansion of the animal
shelter, animal control services, or any related uses.
There are more suitable locations and options for an animal shelter facility within the city. For
instance, the former South Pacific Car Wash at 2750-2770 Bristol St. The property is being
marketed as a redevelopment opportunity, with an existing building of 4,496 sq. ft. on 1.55 acres
of land. This location is adjacent to the Bone Adventure Pet boarding facility. The property would
provide ample land for yard area and future expansion options. The site is in close proximity to
the police department, is easily accessible, and does not neighbor any other businesses to which
it would cause undue detriment. The property appears to be an ideal location to operate an
animal shelter.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
TRIAD COMMERCIAL
Bruce Parsons
Owner/Principal
TRAYLOR, MARIAN
Subject: RE: PH -2 and NB -1 December 5, 2017 Agenda
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR PH -2
From: Christie McDaniel [mcdaniel@tag-oc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 9:33 AM
To: GENIS, SANDRA; Allan Mansoor (allanmansoorc&cimail.com); FOLEY, KATRINA; Jim Righeimer
(Jim.Riaherimer(alcostamesaca.gov); John Stephens (John.Stepens(&costamesaca.aov)
Subject: PH -2 and NB -1 December 5, 2017 Agenda
Dear Mayor Genis and Councilmembers,
I am a resident of Costa Mesa and have been watching closely the Planning Commission decision on PH -2 and also
monitoring the OC Humane Society contract. Unfortunately, due to a work related conflict, I cannot attend tonight's
meeting. I wanted to take this opportunity to share my questions related to these two agenda items.
PH -2:
Under "Proposed Use" it indicates an "area for outdoor walking and exercising of leashed animals is also proposed,
however this activity would be limited to the confines of the site and will not be permitted on public sidewalks.": What
is the impact on the shelter animals from surrounding businesses while in this walk/exercise area? There was testimony
at the Planning Commission (and also letters submitted) from surrounding business owners (who operate automotive
repair shops and a racing business who has indicated publically running race engines which are very loud and has
expressed his concern about this noise impact on the animals).
Under "Requests for Review Planning Commission Action" it indicates "The Applicant has indicated that only animals
from the City of Costa Mesa will be received at the proposed facility.": Is this a condition of the CUP? How does the City
plan to verify if this true?
A general question to ask the City Attorney: If this CUP is approved is the City under any obligation to approve NB -1
(OCHS contract)? Are there any consequences if NB -1 is not approved? Are there any consequences if the City goes out
to bid for an RFP in the next 6 months for a new shelter provider and another provider is selected by Council?
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR PH -2
Informal Paraphrased notes from a meeting between Dr. Botros, owner of the
Orange County Animal Shelter and John Stephens, Costa Mesa City Council
Member — 12/4/2017 10:30-11:30 am.
John — How is your company organized?
Botros -- It is a nonprofit 501 C (3)
John — Do you have a Board of Directors?
Botros — Yes, Myself, Mike Edmonds (A medical rep that Botros has known for years),
and Dr. Botros's wife.
John -- How often does your board meet?
Botros — we meet once a year.
John — Form 909 of your public corp. documents, why is it not filled in?
Botros — Have no idea.
John — If we move forward with your facility, would you allow a City of Costa Mesa
Representative to sit on your Board?
Botros — Possibly, I will need to speak to my advisors.
John - Is Orange County Humane Society (OCHS) affiliated with another organization?
If so, which one?
Botros — Yes
John — Does OCHS have a license to operate with the name?
Botros — Yes it is held by the United States Humane Society.
John — do you have an outside accountant?
Botros — Yes, AMH Prestige. They perform payroll and general accounting. He was not
sure about single year audits.
John - Who is on your staff?
Botros —All Dr.'s at AAA animal clinic, Mirna Metry (full-time for 5 years) leaving at the
end of the year, Rose Gonzales (supervisor, has been there for roughly 5 years full-
time), Mariet Makar (3 or 4 years' part-time clerk, she is a student and works 3 1/2 days a
week), Allyssa [didn't know last name] who is new but pregnant and will be moving on
soon. Allyssa used to work at Pet Smart.
John -Anyone else?
Botros —Yes, four (4) animal attendants, 2 full 2 part-time and head tech trainer, Antonia
Hymas (A 29 -year employee). Antonio also works at AAA hospital.
John -How much time do you spend at the shelter?
Botros —As a physician, 5-6 hours a day. At the kennel, I check the cleaning in the am
and once on my way out for the day.
John -How many volunteers work at the kennel?
Botros —On paper about 20 but probably 5 or 6 that actually put in substantial time.
John -Do you have much contact with volunteers?
Botros —Not really
John -Do you have a training program for the volunteers?
Botros —Yes, we use handouts plus kennel attendant training.
John -What do you do to recruit volunteers?
Botros — Volunteers recruit other volunteers. Volunteers can start anytime and we have
refresher trainings every 6 -months.
John -Why do you think there are so many negative comments from the people that
volunteer at your shelter?
Botros —If you are referring to Steve, he was let go due to bad behavior and cussing out
an animal control officer. And I am not aware of any other volunteer that I have
personally let go of. Also Valerie [Animal control at Newport Beach] was a source of
negativity and some of my volunteers still have ties to her. Volunteers have been the
biggest source of trouble at the shelter. Volunteers are a "pain in the butt."
John -Who supervises volunteers?
Botros — Mirna
John -In December 2016 the shelter license expired. Why not renew?
Botros —We have been trying but it's taking a while. It was around this time that CM
Hatch had recommended Garden Grove to OCHS. At that time, the County Dr. called
to change my mind due to the complexity of GG's animal control situation but it was too
late in the contract process. In January of 2017, the OC Sheriff inspected and
explained that the OCHS was a dirty facility. However, we had been receiving a clean
bill of health from 2008-2016. 1 believe this is retribution for taking approximately a 4 -
million -dollar contract from the County. A revocation was issued for our license and we
are meeting with a County mediator on December 7th to get it back.
John -Who can I call at the County to get their point of view? Possibly Jennifer
Hawkins?
Botros — Possibly
John -Why the no photo no video rule?
Botros —Animal control officer Ana recommended to have those rules.
John -So the policy was driven by CM Animal Control?
Botros —Yes
John -Are behavioral assessments performed?
Botros –Yes, all staff are trained on the procedures.
John -Any behavioral modifications if animals are unruly?
Botros –Yes, we take them for a walk or bring the smaller dogs into the office.
John -How frequently do you euthanize the animals?
Botros –We only euthanize if an animal is very sick or very dangerous. On average we
euthanize 2 dogs per week out of 50. And we do not euthanize healthy animals to
make space.
John -How often a day are the dogs walked?
Botros –At least twice.
John -Are all animals spayed or neutered?
Botros –We only spay or neuter animals older than 5 months and no animals goes
home unfixed.
John -1 have notices that the dogs at the OCHS are more agitated at your shelter why
do you think that is?
Botros –1 think it's because the space is not great and the traffic is light. That's why the
dogs seem more agitated. That's why we want to move to the Baker facility.
John -Grooming?
Botros –If an animal comes in and needs it, they get a bath and a shave.
John -Is it a policy?
Botros –Yes
John -How do you handle your food program?
Botros –A combination of donations and purchases. We buy our food from Walmart.
John -What are the procedures before adoption?
We vaccinate, deworm and/or spay and neuter if necessary.
John -What are your fees?
Botros –We charge, if I'm not mistaken, $100 for dogs and $75 got cats. We also have
an impound fee if a CM resident comes to pick up their animal. We pass on to the
customer any dental costs associated with the animals.
John -Did the City of Westminster leave your facility?
Botros –Yes, they were short staffed so they elected to contract with a nearby hospital
in Garden Grove that has the WAG program.
John—is there an offsite facility where Costa Mesa dogs are kept?
Botros — Yes, it is on Newland and Warner. He rents space from a veterinarian. Dogs
are kept there and held during the 5-7 day hold. The facility is not open to the public,
but you can see it if you want. The Police Chief has seen it.
John -Let's talk about the facility on Baker and some of the negative responses from the
adjacent tenants. The Mechanic claims he uses chemicals that will be harmful to the
animals, what do you think about that?
Botros —If he's so concerned about the animals shouldn't he be concerned about the
people that work at his own facility. Maybe he should move to a more appropriate area.
John -The tenant at 363 Baker is concerned about having barking dogs all day. Have
you gone and measured the noise?
Botros — My architect is ready to address any noise issues with the facility.
John —The City of Costa Mesa has an animal control department within the Police
Department but not an animal care function. Would you be open to allowing the City to
provide animal care employees that work at that at your facility?
Botros —Yes, I'm ok with this concept but I'm not ok with people putting their nose in my
business. I would prefer everyone staying within their responsibilities.
TRAYLOR, MARIAN
Subject: RE: Notification for Orange County Humane Society (OCHS) at 642 Baker Street
(PA -17-36)
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR PH -2
From: HATCH, THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 11:29 AM
To: GREEN, BRENDA <brenda.green@costa mesa ca.goy>
Subject: Fwd: Notification for Orange_Cownty-Humane Society (OCHS) at 642 Baker Street (PA -17-36)
Red folders please. Thanks
Sent from my Whone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "LEE, MEL" <MEL.LEE@costamesaca.gov>
Date: December 5, 2017 at 10:42:02 AM PST
To: CITY COUNCIL <CITYCOUNCIL@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us>
Cc: "CURTIS, BARRY C." <BARRY.CURTIS@costa mesaca.goy>, "GREEN, BRENDA"
<brenda.green@costamesaca.goy>, TOM DUARTE <tpd@iones-mayer.com>, "ROSALES, MARTHA"
< MARTHA. ROSALES@costa mesa ca.goy>, "TRAYLOR, MARIAN' <MARIAN.TRAYLOR@costamesaca.goy>,
"HATCH, THOMAS" <THOMAS. HATCH @costa mesa ca.goy>, "LETOURNEAU, TAMARA"
<TAMARA.LETOURNEAU @costamesaca.gov>, "BAKKILA, VICTOR" <VBAKKILA@costamesaca.gov>
Subject: Notification for Orange County Humane Society (OCHS) at 642 Baker Street (PA -17-36)
Dear Councilmembers —
The following methods of notification were done for the proposed use at tonight's hearing:
1. Postcards were mailed to property owners within a 500 -foot radius on 11/22/17;
2. A public notice sign was posted on the site on 11/21/17; and
3. Notice was published in the newspaper on 11/24/17.
Additionally, a City Council agenda with hyperlinks to the staff report was emailed to the business
owners who spoke at the Planning Commission meeting on 12/1/17.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Mel Lee, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, 92628
Ph. (714) 754-5611 Fax. (714) 754-4856
mel.leeacostamesaca. ov
i
NOTE: Due to the holiday season, City Hall will be closed from Monday. December 25. 2017
through Monday. January 1, 2018. City Hall will resume regular business hours on Tuesday,
January 2, 2018.
HARBOR
BOULEVARD
MEDIAN
IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT I
Public Services
Department
December 5, 2017
DITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR OB -1
Sit..
All
Lr; +T +
■
Z;4 may_ , r, ~-tiF �a� a+,r • „ ! ■ �'!' !! • a . . • A ■1
r
N Fdk
A
PROJECT NEED
Harbor Boulevard Vision Plan identified the need
for improvements such as medians, enhanced
landscaping and streetscape.
Review of past accident history shows need for
raised medians to reduce severe broadside and
head on type of accidents.
Lack of Medians Provide Appearance of Wide
Road — Speeding Issues.
Medians Reduce Conflict Points Reducing
Accident Potential and Improving Traffic Flow.
;ape Within Project Limits.
m
HARBOR BOULEVARD ACCIDENT
PATTERN
84
17
26
• •'Do •,_, • •
. "#*• •* ••
•
� u
••ry
i
accidents Over 5 Year Period.
nvolved Bicycles or Pedtrians.
vere Broadside,Head-O�or Overturned.
L"e1w
.
Ln
• Vbh&* Ped
Head an
. aaAtmed
•
►itobjed
. Olher
P
Raw -end
• BKyde Irwdwed
Sdewsipe
a Fldeabian hw ved
P
8
a
I
i
accidents Over 5 Year Period.
nvolved Bicycles or Pedtrians.
vere Broadside,Head-O�or Overturned.
L"e1w
.
&WO-Ae
• Vbh&* Ped
Head an
. aaAtmed
•
►itobjed
. Olher
.
Raw -end
• BKyde Irwdwed
Sdewsipe
a Fldeabian hw ved
MEDIAN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Stakeholder Meetings Held with Various
Business Owners, including Car
Dealerships and Retail Establishments, and
with Interested Property Owners.
Traffic Counts Conducted at All Driveways.
Median Openings Provided at High Volume
Locations.
Intersections Will Accommodate
Projected Additional Left -Turn Demand for
U -Turns.
PUBLIC OUTREACH AND REFINEMENTS
First Community Meeting on August 16, 2016.
Several Comments Received and Responded.
Adjustments Based on Community Input.
Second Community Meeting on May 31, 2017.
Project Presented to Bikeway and Walkability
Committee on June 7, 2017.
Further Refinements to the Median Layout were
Incorporated
in the New Plan.
PUBLIC OUTREACH AND REFINEMENTS
Project presented to City Council on August 1, 2017.
City Council, while providing tentative approval of
the median concept, directed staff to present the
concept landscape plans to Parks and Recreation
Commission and conduct a third community
meeting.
Parks and Recreation Commission approved the
conceptual landscape design and plant palette on
October 26, 2017.
Third Community Meeting on November 15, 2017.
-)- to the Median Layout.
L _ I
PROPOSED MEDIAN CONCEPT
(PREVIOUS/REVISED)
*rT
� rx
19
Ag
jlm
'
wig
I +me r
� rx
19
Ag
jlm
r -I
c*
M
Ln
L _ I
PROPOSED MEDIAN CONCEPT
(PREVIOUS/REVISED)
W
I •ui�L' LW
dr
r
L
PROPOSED MEDIAN CONCEPT
(PREVIOUS/REVISED)
W�
S -=w-- 'i_-- - - --- - U�
.F
tfAR9Dr! -
I I
t�moss
J
Q9
.r
L
PROPOSED MEDIAN CONCEPT
(PREVIOUS/REVISED)
r -I
Ln
Ln
\
a g0
W
DRIVEWAYS ON HARBOR BLVD
47 Existing Driveways with Full Access (81 total)
25 Driveways with Full Access with the Proposed
Median Design
— Estimate of Peak Hour U -Turns at Intersections:
o Wilson Street — 15 NB
o Victoria Street— 12 NB, 17 SB
o Hamilton Street — 5 NB, 15 SB
o Bay
Street —
21
NB, 6 SB
0 19thStreet
—
10
SB
LANDSCAPE DESIGN GOALS
Recognize the Unique Character of Harbor
o Find Commonality Among Diverse
Conditions
o Reinforce it Through Landscape
Treatments
o Build on Existing Character
Use the Medians to Unify Harbor Boulevard
Provide a Visually Appealing Landscape, and
Create a Sense of Space
AfiM i . P..I
Tylp+cal theme Plant fis /Theodor Robkks Fe'c IIY*1'-O
-7-
S71BM 1RAi?X- LAVE
rrFa�-k�n►rwr.s
Typ cal Them! PlantA41 South Coast Toyota - W-1'-0"
TYPICAL MLDIAN PLANTING
NOW w17
HARBOR BLVD STREETSWE -WILSON TO 19TH STREET
CITY OF COSTA MESA
i Di nc%On
I
PLANT PALETTE- HARBOR BLVD.
Proposed Pianttrig ust
Trees
Stade: rtd Alt. E Prdpd-_ed:
C Oq.— --fp • a 'C ii. mwo, 7lltxrgM/9�V dedrt
lit;Gtarl-:p WM4 ar4 ANttraPY7SC
v.ili�nCtrinia ro:,:4fwv;wn hn ParT
5nrubt
v, t="p...6etrL kq&-: Pamns
wt:n+t"tnraora nand
O Mwft-w G,i,wG MLihc
Wu1 -b.r0. ri.F--taut alio N -6n
rieiaimv:�wrt ;emperresens'apanircl
rirx o.e Grass
a-4rOP4,Uk n St !Cave ay6P
CAMD-kit N~ Perennrts
Sana cemtw4ramp"
Zft=f4na Ar=Ornea LaiiMMia rumaR
SsOtr, F , Am ft
AS— De. two. 6—
A,ft !Carse rtd t4,s hood
Aloe Xooitopw
6reaad O -r
Senecd WPe 111rrre CraI1mm
Seneca mutQafis
rAT.F.— 7ubhs Deer
uraa+
ER06% PNM rd m alert Or wD
fiom Norm lftnr rMeOian1
Ptabnu: Keri -am 13 —,poc
sore
4:een ►a7R1
Petr.Wun toorawneeler darvf
M �RfltOer�u caRagries llebi� llix-SF t7S4
Sane
Save
Saw Leuor-ma
�PYe De.^:7a�0 Ylneja:s
Side
Srne
Sart
CAUFORN1A NAME PE
ftm, these Tor Surra latrmr bra
Naadce Civia'.!tic
nwc rarcRc
. ReO.tce Ecce»etc:
iM97C Vaira-erC_ ad %5Y —!e —t
TREES/PALMS
GDOMMDcOaRS
10 Fan Palms
Serbloomancka{s__
hhV poru rn r+.
RENNIALS �. .
Ea*firtS ATrarr Edt*ks 1&*x•,v -
Cal iforrsia fu6daa
s'iramore 'Co' -umbra
Svcamore 'B,00d;ood-
GROUNOCO1fERSIGRASS EVERGREEN SHRUBS
cam Parm
•�1c `� y� 1,. •a y�i ,i
1 1
a• _
NeS of n. La :a rlebes
r ' Of AhVIATAL GrRAS5i/GRAiSM
CaErigNi nwmr ./Eetli Gras
FW
ch m y E t15
•aL : - oba-+e f)esmebans Green
- T .woe varieties
armvc� xrn.nr ravq Ivrvas ■td
o-rrec tste�dralayraanes . '0
Sal ,a c e,e and,i
Muh er6ii Else Oat Grass
PLANT PALETTE- AUG. 16-16 HARBOR BLVD. MEDIANS AND PARKWAYS d�dKUrd
City of COSTA MESA robinc%on
asakura robinson comps,',
J:l0l101.`121AMM1lM►i■ W±VII
.•� I� ,� --T �_ 1 • iii
}�+�-� �Trclz rte, F
MIA
`fiI it
t. .r..,
:A IMM91:19110612onMI2WFA►i■ W±VII
t 5
� �' I• �' ��� ;, �; � * �, �.� Rei .i.. a, �
at I*■
.., _
i;0.
-�------- :------------
r _
murrom
[
1 l• ,I' a' p- I•
1 4�
I� -�yy
If _
''� iII4 +JIy YM +J.Y 14N4 4
+�F'JFM. •'FiGl4'i aIFiM�. +�FiFMR MAi.. �
4 Ijjjjj.,�
�-, o.r I
I
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the conceptual layout of the
proposed Harbor Boulevard Median
Improvement Project and authorize staff to
complete th
e design and proceed to
project for construction.
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS
FOR NB -1
ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES
TRAYLOR, MARIAN
Subject: RE: PH -2 and NB -1 December S, 2017 Agenda
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR NB -1
From: Christie McDaniel [mcdaniel@tag-oc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 9:33 AM
To: GENIS, SANDRA; Allan Mansoor (allanmansoor(&gmail.com); FOLEY, KATRINA; Jim Righeimer
(Jim. Rio herimer(cbcostamesaca.00v); John Stephens (John.Stepens(cbcostamesaca.gov)
Subject: PH -2 and NB -1 December 5, 2017 Agenda
Dear Mayor Genis and Councilmembers,
I am a resident of Costa Mesa and have been watching closely the Planning Commission decision on PH -2 and also
monitoring the OC Humane Society contract. Unfortunately, due to a work related conflict, I cannot attend tonight's
meeting. I wanted to take this opportunity to share my questions related to these two agenda items.
NB -1: Under "Staff is requesting that City Council" it indicates under #4 authorizes the City Manager "to execute a short-
term contract with another shelter provider, as needed.": Shouldn't this come back to the Council for explanation as to
why it is needed?
Under same heading, it indicates "budgeting for 4 part time General Aide II positions to work in a Kennel Assistant
capacity to assist Animal Control Unit and OCHS staff with care and accounting of Costa Mesa animals.": This is a bit of a
double edge... while it could be good for the animals, it also reinforces the close "working" relationship between the City
staff and the contractor. It also raises the question that since City part time personnel will be working at the shelter to
help the contractor meet the required needs and care of the animals, how much is OCHS reducing the contract with the
City to help the contractor do what the contractor is supposed to be doing presently for the care of the animals?
Under "Analysis" it indicates that "The following services will continue to be provided at the OCHS Huntington Beach
shelter location: adoptions, other animal placement, rescue group coordination, public education...": Why are none of
these services provided at Costa Mesa site? Side questions: How many CM animals are euthanized on a monthly
basis? Why are they euthanized? What rescue groups does OCHSA work with? Are all in OC or elsewhere?
Under same heading, it indicates "annual third party customer service training for all full-time and part-time animal
shelter staff,": when does this happen for the first time? Has it been done in the past?
Under same heading, it also discusses a detailed sanitation plan and that this will "include required daily duties and
responsibilities by paid and volunteer shelter employees in order to maintain an adequately sanitized facility." : How is
the City going to verify? OCHS recently improved their website (most likely in last 3-4 months) — how many volunteers
do they have?
Under same heading, it indicates "Ensure adequate webmaster services in order to maintain a current inventory of
adoptable animals on the shelter website.": What is the time frame for this? What about other forms of social
media? What about posting on website and social media "Is this your animal?"
While it was stated at the Planning Commission hearing by the City, 6-10 dogs are taken in a week,,, is that
accurate? How many find their way home? Do we have those numbers?
In general, how does the City justify subsidizing a "private" contractor at the rate of $176,000/year for a contract that
the City (residents) are already paying $79,000/year? Are there other private contractors for the City we are
subsidizing?
I appreciate this opportunity to share my questions.
Sincerely, Christie McDaniel
TRAYLOR, MARIAN
Subject: FW: New Business Item 1
From: t ewing [tracyrewing@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 11:15 AM
To: GENIS, SANDRA; MANSOOR, ALLAN; FOLEY, KATRINA; RIGHEIMER, JIM; STEPHENS, JOHN
Subject: New Business Item 1
Re: New Business Item 1
Dear Mayor Genis and Councilmembers,
While I am a resident of Newport Beach, I am aware that the City of Costa Mesa is considering their contract with Orange
County Humane Society.
I have visited this shelter in this past. My first impression of the OC Humane Society sadly is not a good one. As I walked
through the kennels what stood out most to me were the wet dogs! These poor dogs had no way to escape the hose while
their kennels were being hosed down. Their own feces and urine splashed on them during the cleaning. Only to be left to
drip dry in the cold and to be sprayed again during next cleaning. Many dogs did not have bedding. This is an old facility
that seemed to be in bad need of repair. As a former shelter and Veterinarian Technician I was shocked at care provided
for these shelter animals. Some of the worst I have seen.
I sincerely hope that the City reviews this item closely. Thank you for your time.
Tracy Ewing
Newport Beach resident
TRAYLOR, MARIAN
Subject: FW: New Business 1
From: Flo Martin [mailto:flomama@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 1:06 PM
To: RIGHEIMER, JIM<JIM.RIGHEIMER@costamesaca.gov>; FOLEY, KATRINA <KATRINA.FOLEY@costamesaca.gov>;
GENIS, SANDRA <SAND RA.G EN IS@costa mesaca.gov>; alan.mansoor@costamesaca.gov; STEPHENS, JOHN
<10HN.STEPHENS@costamesaca.gov>; SHELTON, KELLY <KELLY.SHELTON@costamesaca.gov>; GREEN, BRENDA
<brenda.green@costamesaca.gov>; TRAYLOR, MARIAN<MARIAN.TRAYLOR@costamesaca.gov>
Subject: New Business 1
Dear City Councilmembers,
How the City takes care of our animals is important to me.
Several weeks ago, after an invite from Lt. Bakkila, I toured the Humane Society facility in HB as well
as the new animal shelter under construction on Baker.
The HB quarters left me with the memory of constantly -barking dogs. Mayhem! Also, little
Chihuahuas in outdoor cages. Too darned cold for such tiny poochers! All the food and some water
trays were empty.
The 642 Baker building is way too close to multi -family housing across the street. Barking 24/7 is not
a pretty picture!
Also, Bullet Performance Car Repairs is right next door. Can you imagine the effects of car engine
and repair machinery on the animals?
The Baker retrofitting needs some serious sound mitigation to protect the businesses next door, the
folks living across the street and THE ANIMALS INSIDE! I would also like to see some shade trees
and greenery for a dog run.
Several years ago, I spoke here to oppose the City's contract renewal of animal services to the
Humane Society. I heard residents and animal care volunteers describe the horrific conditions
there. Last week, I spoke with a family member who is a serious animal safety person and
volunteer. She, too, had a sad tale about the treatment of a customer at the vet clinic on the
property. Plus ca change, plus ca reste le meme. The more things change...!
read the staff report for this item. Attachment 4, the Oct. 23rd, letter that Mayor Genis shared, is
chilling. All nine pages show evidence, both photos and anecdotal, of unsafe, unsanitary conditions
and inhumane treatment of animals at the Humane Society. Council, if you vote to renew the contract
with the Humane Society, go for six months, ONLY six months.
Rose Tingle, in her powerful Voice of OC article, mentioned lack of oversight of sheltering
organizations. I agree.
I urge you to approve a full-time management aide! Also, approve four part-time aide positions for
kennel assistance.
And, finally, keep all options open for considering the OC Animal Care as a service provider for 2019.
Flo Martin
2442 Andover Place,
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
949.933.3699 (cell)
"it is when we are alone that we are the least alone." St. Augustine
I
HATCH, THOMAS
From:
DUNIVENT, STEVE
Sent:
Tuesday, December 05, 2017 3:47 PM
To:
CITY COUNCIL; HATCH, THOMAS
Cc:
SHARPNACK, ROBERT; BAKKILA, VICTOR; BACA, ANNA; MANLEY, MARK; SCOTT, GREG;
STEVE DUNIVENT
GREEN, BRENDA
Subject:
FW: Item NB -1, OC Humane Society
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO ALL
A Council member requested City revenue information related to the OC Humane Society. Please see the following:
We receive spay/neuter fees as well as license fees from the shelter, but not impound fees.
The license fees are comingled with all of the applications and renewals that we receive either by mail or at the counter;
therefore, it is a little more difficult to isolate which ones came from the shelter but these may be able to be tracked
separately in the future.
The spay/neuter fees are easily identifiable as those are only collected by the shelter. Totals are summarized below.
SPAY/NEUTER FEES
FY 15-16 $
3,100
FY 1Ci17 $
2,810
FY 17-18 to date $
840
Hope this helps.
STEVE DUNIVENT
Interim Finance Director
City of Costa Mesa,
CA
714.754.5243
EIN 95-2225005
Name in IRS Master File ORANGE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
Street Address 21632 NEWLAND ST
City, State, Zip HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92646-7610
NTEE Code D20
NTEE Classification Animal Protection and Welfare
NTEE Type Animal -Related
Classification Charitable Organization
Subsection 501(c)(3) (View the list of codes)
Activities (913) Prevention of cruelty to animals
Foundation Status Organization that normally receives no more than one-third of its support
from gross investment income and unrelated business income and at the same time more than one-
third of its support from contributions, fees, and gross receipts related to exempt purposes.
509(a)(2)
Deductibility Contributions are deductible
Affiliation Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent
auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations).
Group Name [Not Applicable]
Ruling Date June, 1945
Asset Amount $215,043
Income Amount$559,242
Form 990 Revenue Amount $550,318
Latest Form 990 Return June, 2017
Filing Requirement 990 (all other) or 990EZ return
Fiscal Year End June
IRS Forms 990
(provided courtesy of Foundation Center) (Log In or Register Now to View Forms 9901)
Source: https://www.charitynavigi tor.or index_.cfm?bav-search.profile&ein=952225005