HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-60 - Denying Planning Action PA-95-23RESOLUTION NO. S- 4 D
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING PLANNING
ACTION PA -95-23.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, an application was filed by Nancy Clark, authorized agent for Michael
Cherney, with respect to real property located at 1110 Victoria Street, requesting a Conditional
Use Permit for a residential facility for adult men and women recovering from drug or alcohol
dependency in an existing apartment building, and a variance from covered parking requirements
in an R3 zone; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on
April 10, 1995; and
WHEREAS, this application was called up for Council review by Council Member
Sandra Genis on April 11, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on May 1, 1995, and
denied Planning Action PA -95-23; and
WHEREAS, the City Council voted 5-0 to conduct a rehearing of Planning
Action PA -95-23 at the request of the authorized agent; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on July 5, 1995;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the evidence in the record and
the findings contained in Exhibit "A", the City Council hereby denies Planning Action PA -95-23
with respect to the property described above.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of July, 1995.
ATTEST:
2h4::�� 7.
1
Deputy City lerk of the City of Costa Mesa
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
Mayor the City of Costa Mesa
PROVED AS TO FORM
CITY ATTORNEY
I, MARY T. ELLIOTT, Deputy City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. q-5'-(,00
was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof,
held on the 5th day of July, 1995.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 6th day of July, 1995.
Deputy Ck Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of
the City q4uncil of the City of Costa Mesa
EXHIBIT "A"
Planning Action PA -95-23
FINDINGS:
A. The information presented does not substantially comply with Section 13-346 of the
Costa Mesa Municipal Code in that no special circumstances applicable to the property
exist to justify granting of the variance from parking. Strict application of the zoning
ordinance will not deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by owners of other
property in the vicinity under the identical zoning classification.
B. The information presented does not substantially comply with Costa Mesa Municipal
Code Section 13-347 in that the proposed residential facility is not substantially
compatible with other developments in the same general area due to the intensity of the
use which has resulted in disturbances to neighboring residents, and due to inadequate
on-site parking and inadequate monitoring of residents.
C. The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City environmental procedures, and has
been found to be exempt from CEQA.
D. The project is exempt from Article 22-1/2, Transportation System Management of Title
13 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code.