HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-34 - Denying Planning Action PA-95-23RESOLUTION NO. 96--34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING PLANNING
ACTION PA -95-23.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, an application was filed by Nancy Clark, authorized agent for Michael
Cherney, with respect to real property located at 1110 Victoria Street, requesting a Conditional
Use Permit for a residential facility for adult men and women recovering from drug or alcohol
dependency in an existing apartment building and a variance from covered parking requirements
in an R3 zone; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on
April 10, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on May 1, 1995;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record and
the findings contained in Exhibit "A", the City Council hereby denies Planning Action PA -95-23
with respect to the property described above.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of May, 1995.
ATTEST:
T
Deputy Cit Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
-1-4-
M&o of the City of Costa Mesa
,PITROVED A`Si TO FORM
CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, MARY T. ELLIOTT, Deputy City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. S- 3
was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof,
held on the 1st day of May, 1995.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 2nd day of May, 1995.
Deputy Cit Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of
the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa
EXHIBIT "A"
Resolution No. 95-34
Finding for Denial of Planning Action PA -95-23:
The information presented during the public hearing does not substantially comply with Costa
Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-347, in that the residential facility is not substantially
compatible with other developments in this same area due to the intensity of the use which has
resulted in disturbances to neighboring residents, and due to inadequate on-site parking and
inadequate monitoring of residents.