Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-79 - Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise from Continental Cablevision, Inc to U.S. West, IncRESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE FROM CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION, INC., TO U. S. WEST, INC. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, in 1983 and pursuant to Ordinance No. 83-2, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa added Title 19 to the Costa Mesa Municipal Code (Section 19-05, et seq.) establishing regulations for granting and operating cable communications systems (the "Cable Television Ordinance"). Since then, the Cable Television Ordinance has been amended on several occasions, including pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 84-6 and 93-15; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Cable Television Ordinance, the City entered into a Franchise Agreement with Copley/Colony Cablevision of Costa Mesa, Inc. ("Grantee"), effective March 5, 1984, as amended by the Amendment to Franchise Agreement effective June 22, 1989; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Cable Television Ordinance, the City adopted Resolution No. 95-58 to approve a transfer of control of the Grantee to Continental Cablevision, Inc. ("Continental") from the Providence Journal Company effective June 19, 1995; and WHEREAS, Grantee is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Continental; and WHEREAS, Continental has controlled the operation of the franchise from June 19, 1995, to the present; and WHEREAS, Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 19-250(c) requires City Council to consent to any transfer or change of control of the franchise; and WHEREAS, PJC and Continental Cablevision, Inc. ("Continental") have entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 18, 1994 (the "Agreement"), subject to, among other considerations, any required approval of the franchising authorities with respect thereto; and WHEREAS, FCC Regulations (47 CFR Section 76.502(i)(1) require that in order for a cable operator to obtain City approval of a transfer or change in control of the franchise, it must submit to the City a FCC Form 394 and any other information as may be required by the City; and WHEREAS, on February 27, 1996, U. S. West, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, announced a definitive agreement to merge with Continental, a Delaware Corporation, the parent corporation of Grantee, subject to, among other considerations, any required approval of the franchising authorities with respect thereto; and WHEREAS, upon consummation of the merger contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Transaction"), Continental will merge with U. S. West, Inc., or with a wholly- owned subsidiary of U. S. West, Inc., and the Grantee under the control of U. S. West, Inc., or its wholly-owned subsidiary ("US West"), will continue to be bound by all.existing terms, conditions, and obligations under the franchise previously granted by the City to Grantee; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 1996, US West and Continental filed an FCC Form 394 with the City requesting City Council approval of the transfer of control of Continental, the ultimate parent corporation of Grantee to US West (hereinafter referred to as the "Transfer"); and WHEREAS, effect of the Transaction and the Transfer will change effective control of the Grantee from Continental to US West; and WHEREAS, US West is a publicly owned company; and WHEREAS, in support of its Form 394 Application, US West and Continental have submitted to the City the following documents which are on file with the City Clerk, and are collectively referred to as the "Transfer Documents": 1. Form 394 with 6 exhibits, filed with the City on May 3, 1996; 2. Letter with a one volume appendix from US West to the City of Costa Mesa, dated May 3, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Conference Report to the 1992 Federal Cable Television Act, in discussing franchise renewal under Section 626 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. Section 546) states that transferees of a cable television franchise are not responsible for breaches of the franchise committed by the transferor. Consequently, the City Council finds that it is necessary that any Franchise noncompliance issues be remedied prior to the Transfer; and WHEREAS, Grantee has voluntarily agreed to reimburse the City for its reasonable administrative, accounting, and legal costs incurred in processing its application for approval of the Transfer; and WHEREAS, the City has evaluated the Grantee's compliance with the Cable Television Ordinance and the Franchise Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Grantee is in compliance with the Cable Television Ordinance and the Franchise Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Costa Mesa City Council finds that, based upon the representations contained in the Transfer Documents, and the terms and conditions of this Resolution, US West has the legal, financial, character, technical and public interest qualifications to control the Franchise. The City Council hereby approves and consents to the transfer of control, subject to the Grantee and US West complying with the terms and conditions of this Resolution. SECTION 2. Upon the close of the Transfer, Grantee and US West shall comply with and be bound by the following documents: 1. The Cable Television Ordinance; 2. The Franchise Agreement; and 3. This Resolution and the Exhibits attached to it. SECTION 3. Grantee shall comply with all lawful rate regulation orders issued against it pursuant to Section 76.900 et seq. of the FCC Regulations. SECTION 4. Grantee and US West agree that notwithstanding Section 521 et seq. of Title 47 of the United States Code, following the close of the Transfer, the Grantee, under the control of US West, shall assume responsibility with respect to the Franchise for all prior acts or omissions of the Grantee while under the control of Continental. The City Council hereby finds that the Franchise is presently in full force and effect. The City Council further finds that the Grantee is currently in compliance with the Franchise and its obligations. SECTION 5. Grantee shall continue to operate the existing public access studio located in Costa Mesa, California, and the related facilities required for public, educational, and governmental ("PEG") access at the same level of effort as currently provided as of the effective date of this Resolution consistent with the Franchise. Said facilities shall be made available for use by City residents. SECTION 6. Grantee and US West shall assume the obligations of Continental in its application of March 6, 1996, to the Federal Communications Commission to extend to the City of Costa Mesa the "Social Contract" as set forth at FCC 95-137. SECTION 7. Grantee shall comply with the Customer Service Standards of the FCC (Section 76.304 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations) as adopted by the City at Section 19-60(I) of the Cable Television Ordinance. SECTION 8. Upon notice to the City, US West may thereafter assign or transfer the franchise to an entity controlled by or under common control with US West. SECTION 9. Grantee shall reimburse the City for its actual administrative, accounting, consulting, and legal costs to the extent they are reasonably incurred in processing the application for approval of the Transfer. The reimbursement amount shall not exceed Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($3,500.00) and the application fee of $250.00 paid by Continental shall be applied to those costs. Grantee shall reimburse the City said costs regardless of whether the Transaction and the Transfer closes. The City shall provide Grantee with an itemized statement of the amount due within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the Resolution approving the Transfer and Grantee shall reimburse the City for the reasonable costs included on the statement within thirty (30) days after receipt of the statement. of Federal SECTION 10. Failure of Grantee to comply with any material provision of this Resolution or the Franchise shall be grounds for the City to invoke any of the City's remedies under and in accordance with the Franchise. SECTION 11. The consent herein granted shall be effective upon the closing of the Transaction and the City shall be notified by letter directed to the City Clerk promptly upon such closing. SECTION 12. Grantee and US West shall, within thirty (30) days of the close of the Transaction, file in the office of. the City Clerk, a written Acceptance and Guarantee of this Resolution executed in the form of Exhibit A, attached hereto. By executing and filing the Acceptance and Guarantee, Grantee and US West guarantee performance of all obligations hereunder. The Acceptance and Guarantee shall be notarized so as to indicate that the persons executing the Acceptance and Guarantee have the authority to bind Grantee and US West. Failure of Grantee and US West to timely file the Acceptance and Guarantee shall void the approval of the Transfer. SECTION 13. Grantee and US West acknowledge that the City has provided the notice required pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 107.6. SECTION 14. The City Manager and the City Attorney, or their designees, are hereby authorized and empowered to execute any documents necessary in their discretion to implement the approvals contained herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of August, 1996. ATTEST: 1. Deputy City C t k of the City of Costa Mesa el�= eZt4-=le' Ma r f the City of Costa esa VED AS TO FORM -CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF COSTA MESA ) I, MARY T. ELLIOTT, Deputy City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 94-,7q was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th day of August, 1996, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Erickson, Buffa, Hornbuckle, Genis, Monahan NOES: None ABSENT: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 6th day of August, 1996. 2"-,. qj,- -� -, I , ZZ -- Deputy Cifi Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Cobncil of the City of Costa Mesa EXHIBIT A ACCEPTANCE AND GUARANTEE OF TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF FRANCHISE U.S. West, Inc., hereby accept and guarantee each and every term of Resolution No. 96-79 of the City of Costa Mesa, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE FROM CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION, INC. TO U.S. WEST, INC. Copley/Colony Cablevision of Costa Mesa, Inc. hereby agrees to reimburse the City of Costa Mesa reasonable administrative, accounting, consulting and legal costs incurred in processing the application for approval of the Transfer in an amount not to exceed Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($3,500.00) within thirty days (30) of receipt of an itemized statement of such costs from the City regardless of whether the Transfer referred to in said Resolution has not closed by said date. U.S. West, Inc. hereby waives any right to require the City to proceed first against Copley/Colony Cablevision of Costa Mesa, Inc. or to pursue any other remedy in City's power to enforce said Resolution. Dated: U.S. WEST, INC. N By: m Name: Barbara M. apha Dated: v -k13 Title: Vice President - Law COPLEY/COLONY CABLEVISION OF COSTA MESA, INC. rate & Affairs I CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of County of oS A,� q L Lis 0 On before me, R DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC" personally appeared NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) impersonally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized No. 5907 capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their IDEM 11104FAlill( signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), < , � COWA#110416ea or the entity upon behalf of which the Notayoa�u� co NTN person(s) acted, executed the instrument. �. Damm. Eent..,c" ^, lr„ WITENF-SS my -hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT X --- TITLE O TYPE OF DOCUMENT 15 "S'A /t_, C^— NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184