HomeMy WebLinkAbout- - Presentations - 3/31/2026Fiscal Year 2026-27
City Council Study Session
March 31, 2026
Proposed Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) Budget
2
Public Works Staffing & Divisions
The Public Works Department has 79 full-time staff members
composed of five management, four clerical, and 70 professional /
technical staff spread across five divisions. In addition, Public Works
has part time staff equivalent to 6 full-time positions.
Administration •Water Quality
•Streets and
Parkway
Improvements
•Storm Drain
Improvements
•Development
•Real Property
•Park
Development
•Construction
Management
•Active
Transportation
•Traffic Operations
•Transportation
Planning
•Residential Permit
Parking
•Street Cleaning
•Graffiti Abatement
•Street Maintenance
•Storm Drain
Maintenance
•Signs and Marking
•Park, Parkway, and
Median
Maintenance
Administration General
ServicesEngineering Transportation
Services
Maintenance
Services
•Facility
Maintenance
•Fleet
Maintenance
•Recycling and
Solid Waste
•Warehouse
Operations
````
3
The CIP Process
4
CIP Budget
•Financed from multiple funding sources
•Can include Federal, State, County, and local funds
•Funding sources may have different restrictions regarding eligible projects, record retention schedules, and reporting
•Often involve multiple levels of governmental oversight, coordination, approval, and auditing
•Requires coordination from all City departments, City Attorney’s Office, and related grantors
•CIP Project Financial Threshold in Costa Mesa: $30,000
5
CIP Projects
•Project identification/idea is developed
•Design phase
•Bidding phase
•Contract selection and award
•Construction phase
•Project completion
•Ongoing maintenance and repair
A multi-year program
Identifies the next round of
project priorities
Projects typically not completed in one
year
Projects undergo seven (7) distinct phases over
multiple years:
6
CIP Recognition
CIP programs encompass
both current year (ongoing
projects) and proposed
future year projects.
City staff are dedicated to
producing a high-quality CIP
program and projects.
Staff has won numerous
awards for CIP projects.
````
7
Current (FY 2025-26) CIP
Accomplishments
8
•Citywide project consisting of concrete
sidewalk, curb & gutter, and access ramp
improvements, along with grind & overlay
street reconstruction, and street slurry
sealing.
•Improvements included Mesa Verde,
College Park, and other neighborhoods.
•Effort to reach and maintain City Council’s
goal to have a PCI index of at least 85.
FY
25/26 Citywide Street Improvements
Yellowstone Drive
9
Police Department Carpet & Indoor PaintFY
25/26
•New floors throughout the building, including
basement.
•Project included sanding, priming, repairing, and
painting all interior surfaces, along with repainting
the back exterior and roll-up doors.
•Floor Replacement Project completed October 2025.
•Interior Repaint Project completed July 2025.
10
FY
25/26 Norma Hertzog Roof Replacement
•Expected completion by May
2026.
•Removed all metal panels to
address leaks.
•Removed flat roofing and
replaced with new system
for improved drainage.
•New self-adhering high-
temperature roofing
underlayment installed for
waterproofing.
11
•Original playground equipment was
installed in 1995.
•Prior to construction, there was single
play structure and volleyball court.
•Once complete, playground will consist
of two separate age-appropriate play
areas.
•Four slides and seven climbing
components.
•New picnic shade structure.
•New LED park lighting and ADA access.
•Installed sidewalk poetry.
FY
25/26 Brentwood Park Improvements
12
FY
25/26
Fairview Road Improvement
(Fair Dr. to Newport Blvd.)
•Constructed active transportation improvements along Fairview Road between Fair Drive and Newport Boulevard.
•Construction completion by June 2026.
•Project includes:
Class IV Cycle Tracks
New HAWK signal at Fairview Rd./Valley Forge (May 2026)
Green bicycle conflict zone striping
High visibility pedestrian crossings
Transit stop improvements
New bicycle signal at Fairview Rd./Wilson St.
New landscaping and irrigation
13
FY
25/26 Design of Various Projects Completed
•Fire Station No. 2
•Costa Mesa Skate Park Expansion
•Ketchum-Libolt Park Expansion
•Shalimar Park Improvements
•Signal Modern Multi Modal Safety Improvements
````
14
Current (FY 2025-26) CIP
Update
15
FY 2025-26 Budget
•Staff requested a partial waiver of the Capital Asset
Needs (CAN) Ordinance to address the FY 2024-25
and FY 2025-26 revenue shortfall.
•For F Y 2024-25, approximately $2.4 million in
previously allocated capital projects were deferred.
•In FY 2025-26, the amount allocated to new CIP
projects was reduced by $1.2 million.
16
Deferred Projects List
No.Project Name Deferred AmountNotes
1 Finance Security/Effic. Remodel$ 250,000 Sufficient funding in project account
2 Citywide Community Choice Energy Study$ 150,000 Project not considered at this time
3 City Hall Breezeway Roof$ 245,000 Moved to FY 27-28
4 Westside Restoration Project$ 450,000 Moved to FY 27-28
5 Parkway Maintenance Program Citywide$ 233,757 Replaced funding source
6 Costa Mesa Country Club Modernization$ 400,000 Moved to long-term future
7 Butterfly Gardens$ 100,000 Moved to FY 28-29
8 Senior Center Improvements$ 250,000 Received Federal grant
Savings from Completed Projects $ 300,000 N/A
TOTAL $ 2,378,757
17
Major Projects Underway/Scheduled*
Major projects include:
•Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project
•Citywide Alley Improvements
•Citywide Street Improvements
•Citywide Tree Maintenance
•Communications Building Improvements
•Costa Mesa Country Club Modernization
•Costa Mesa Skate Park Expansion
•Fairview Park Fence Sign Trail
•Fairview Road Improvement Project
•Fire Station #2 Reconstruction
•Ketchum-Libolt Park Expansion
•Mesa Del Mar Multimodal Access
•Shalimar Park Improvements
•Newport Boulevard Frontage Road Rehab.
•Senior Center HVAC and Roof Replacement
•Sunflower Avenue Rehabilitation
•TeWinkle Lakes Rehab and Repair Project
•Westside Substation Improvements
*Full listing of ongoing projects in Attachment 1 of Staff Report.
````
18
FY 2026-27
Proposed CIP Projects
19
CIP Overview
•Projects were identified based on:
• City Council Priorities, Goals, and Objectives
• Commissions, committee, and community feedback
• Citywide infrastructure and facility needs assessments
• Department requests
• Budgetary constraints
•The CIP includes General Fund allocation to meet
minimum Maintenance of Effort (MOE) for Gas Tax and
Measure M2.
20
Quick Facts
Projects recommended
Total CIP amount
Future Bond/Financing
21
Funding Sources
Primary funding sources for Proposed FY 2026-27 CIP include:
22
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed CIP Projects
23
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed CIP Projects
(continued)
24
CIP Categories
Facilities
$16,359,000
49.0%
Parks
$1,630,000
4.9%
Streets
$8,815,000
26.3%
Transportation
$6,596,920
19.8%
Significant portion of this is $12
million bond financing for the Fire
Station 2 reconstruction
Primarily funded by grants or
restricted funds
````
25
FY 2026-27
Projects
26
Citywide Alley Improvements $200K
Gas TaxFY
26/27
•Annual citywide project to improve the City’s public
alleys from asphalt to concrete pavement that will last
for many years.
•Alley improvements are throughout the City based on
condition and priority.
•Multi-year project. Nearing the last phase.
•Remaining 14 alleyways will be designed in FY 26/27.
27
Police Department Chiller Replacement $800K
CIP FundFY
26/27
•Original PD chillers are more 50 years old and
need replacement.
•New chillers more energy efficient than
current model.
•Staff will pursue grant funding opportunities
with SoCalRen.
28
Police Department Emergency
Communications Center
$1.1M
CIP FundFY
26/27
•Complete renovation of the Police
Department Communications facility.
•Upgrades will also include new thermal
and moisture protection, fire suppression,
plumbing, HVAC, roof replacement,
electrical and communication
infrastructure.
•Total estimated project cost - $4 million.
29
Citywide Tree Maintenance
(in Public Right-of-Way)
$200K
Gas TaxFY
26/27
•Provides enhanced maintenance
to median and parkway trees that
are susceptible to the effect of
recent unprecedented weather
events.
•Plant new trees in medians and
parkways.
30
Harper Park Playground ImprovementsFY
26/27
Project updates including a
complete redesign of the park
layout, including:
•Removal of existing equipment
and installation of modernized
playground area and
equipment.
•Replacement of safety
surfacing.
•Removal and replacement of
tables, benches, and trash
receptacles.
$400K
CIP Fund
31
Moon Park Improvements FY
26/27
Phase 1 – Conceptual Design and Community Outreach and Coordination with other Agencies. Project will include a redesign of the park and replacement of the existing playground including:
•Review of the park layout•Removal of existing equipment and installation of modernized playground area and equipment.•Replacement safety surfacing•Addition of safety fencing•Bike trail access improvements •Lighting Improvements •Replacement of park amenities such as benches, tables, drinking fountain and receptacles
$50K
CIP Fund
32
FY
26/27
•Construction of new and improved features designed by Spohn Ranch, a
renowned skate park designer.
•Installation of a new pump track.
•Funded through Orange County Board of Supervisor Katrina Foley.
•Available funding from prior years.
Costa Mesa Skate Park Expansion $500K
CIP FundFY
26/27
33
Adams Avenue Multipurpose Trail $2.77M
Grant FundsFY
26/27
•Project on Adams Avenue
between Royal Palm Drive and
Santa Ana River.
•Enhances accessibility and safety
for bicyclists and pedestrians by
providing separation from
vehicles.
•City received competitive federal
grant for construction.
•Improvements consistent with
the City's General Plan and the
Active Transportation Plan.
34
Mesa Del Mar Multimodal Access $350K
Grant FundsFY
26/27
•Safety and mobility improvements along
Junipero Drive from Presidio Drive to
Arlington Drive.
•Project includes parking protected cycle
tracks, green bicycle conflict zone
striping, new sidewalks, and
accessibility improvements.
•New raised intersection at Arlington
Drive and Junipero Drive.
•Pavement rehabilitation.
•Design will begin Winter 2026.
35
Finance & Pension Advisory Committee
(FiPAC) Recommendation
•Public Works staff presented to FiPAC on March 11,
2026.
•Committee appreciated all the information
provided and expressed interest in holding a follow-
up meeting to develop a final recommendation to
City Council.
36
Parks and Community Services (PACS)
Commission Recommendation
•One-Year and Five-Year CIP pertaining to Parks presented to PACS on March 12
•The Commission recommended the following for City Council consideration:
Marina View Park – For Fiscal Year 2026-27 add sand in areas where the
levels are low and address sidewalk improvements.
Wilson Park – For Fiscal Year 2026-27 address improvements identified in
the Park Assessment Study for bathrooms.
Community Gardens – Add $50,000 for Fiscal Year 2027-28 for planning for
Community Gardens and consider Neth Park as potential site in a multi-
faceted way.
Westside Park Development – Add $400,000 for Fiscal Year 2027-28.
Fairview Park and Skate Park Project – Consider ways to cut back on
projects and evaluate/pursue private funding.
Revise the Five-Year CIP to include only parks in the “C” category.
````
37
Additional Information
38
Five-Year CIP (FY 2026-27 to FY 2030-31)
•Five-Year plan includes projects deferred and those proposed in
upcoming fiscal years.
•Attachment 4 includes proposed Five-Year CIP.
•Five-Year plan is updated annually based on Goals and Priorities by City
Council, input from commissions, committees and community, and
best practices.
•Projects listed from Years 2-5 and Future are for planning purposes and
grant opportunities.
•Facilities Assessment and Park Assessment Studies were used to
identify future projects.
39
FY 2026-27 Five -Year CIP vs. Proposed
PROJECT NAME Five-Year CIP Proposed CIP
Building Modification Projects $200,000 $250,000
Civic Center - Miscellaneous Repairs $150,000 $150,000
Corp Yard - Equipment Maintenance - Bay Doors and Vehicle Hoist Replace $110,000 -
Corp Yard - Vehicle Hoist -$250,000
Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations $150,000 $150,000
Sewer Line Improvement for City Facilities $50,000 -
Citywide Tree Maintenance (in Public Right-of-Way)$200,000 $200,000
Fairview Park - Replace Service Road Asphalt $200,000 -
Park Parking Lot and Playground Rehabilitation $150,000 $100,000
Park Security Lighting Replacement $100,000 $150,000
Park Sidewalk Replacement $75,000 $50,000
Shalimar Park Expansion $350,000 -
Skate Park Parking Lot and Parking Spaces Expansion $40,000 -
Tree Planting and Small Tree Care $150,000 -
Citywide Alley Improvements $650,000 $200,000
Citywide Street Improvements $5,000,000 $5,450,000
Citywide Street Sign Replacement $50,000 -
Parkway & Medians Improvement Program $200,000 $200,000
Adams Avenue Active Transportation Improvements - Multipurpose Trails $4,777,000 $2,777,000
Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements $250,000 $250,000
Center Street Pedestrian Crossing and Circulation Improvements $500,000 $500,000
Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements $100,000 $75,000
Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements $150,000 $200,000
Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit Services $800,000 $650,000
Junipero Drive Improvements/Mesa Del Mar Multimodal Access $500,000 $349,920
New Sidewalk/Missing Link Program $100,000 $100,000
Priority Sidewalk Repair $65,000 $65,000
Total $15,067,000 $12,116,920
40
CAN Repayment Schedule
•For Fiscal Year 2026-27, while the proposed funding meets the 5 percent
minimum contribution required by the CAN Ordinance, it does not account for
repayment of the prior waivers.
•It is anticipated that an additional General Fund contribution of $600,000 is
required for CAN repayment for Fiscal Year 2026-27.
Deferred Allocation Total Deferment Year 1
FY 2024-25 Projects 2,378,757.00$ 475,751.40$
FY 2025-26 CAN 1,249,855.30$ 124,985.53$
Total 3,628,612.30$ 600,736.93$
41
Next Steps
•The FY 2026-27 Proposed Operating and CIP budget must be adopted by June
30, 2026.
•The proposed CIP recommendation provides $33.4 million from multiple
funding sources to improve City infrastructure in all key areas.
•In addition to the new Proposed CIP, there are 86 ongoing CIP projects, totaling
approximately $88 million.
•Staff requests the City Council provide general direction during the Study
Session on the FY 2026-27 Proposed CIP Budget and the Five-Year (FY 2026-27
to FY 2030-31) CIP.
42
FY 2026-27 Tentative Budget Calendar
FY 2026-27 Proposed CIP Budget Review
Finance and
Pension Advisory
Committee
March 11, 2026
FY 2026-27 Proposed CIP Budget Review
Parks and
Community
Services
Commission
March 12, 2026
FY 2026-27 Proposed CIP Budget Study Session City Council March 31, 2026
FY 2026-27 Operating Budget Review
Finance and
Pension Advisory
Committee
April 8, 2026
FY 2026-27 Proposed CIP Budget Review Planning
Commission May 11, 2026
FY 2026-27 Proposed Operating Budget Study Session City Council May 12, 2026
FY 2026-27 Proposed Operating and CIP Budget Public Hearing City Council June 2, 2026
FY 2026-27 Proposed Operating and CIP Budget Special Meeting/Study Session #2
(if necessary)City Council June 9, 2026
FY 2026-27 Proposed Budget Adoption (if necessary)City Council June 16, 2026
29 March 2026
Dear Honorable Mayor Stephens and City Councilmembers,
As Chair and Vice Chair of the Parks and Community Services Commission, we are writing to provide a
brief update on our March 12 discussion regarding our Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
recommendations for this upcoming year.
As part of the assessment and recommendation process, PACS reviewed the City’s recent Parks
Assessment report–a 300+ page document that outlines park needs– and conducted site visits to all
parks identified with a “C” condition rating. While there are 12 parks in this category, we found a wide
range in the actual severity of conditions. Our recommendations were developed through a consistent
and analytical approach, taking into account park conditions, specific deficiencies, proximity to park
deserts, and the demographics of surrounding communities (identified in the Open Space Master Plan
draft).
In addition to synthesizing the parks assessment plan, we also applied our values matrix—particularly
safety and maintenance, equity and access, and community-centered planning—in order to develop
recommendations grounded in both need and impact. We believe these recommendations reflect the best
interests of Costa Mesa while demonstrating a thoughtful and fiscally responsible approach to
prioritization. We look forward to talking more about our values document at our April presentation to City
Council.
Attached you will find a budget comparison of our recommendations alongside the draft CIP presented by
staff, as well as a map illustrating the Parks Assessment’s “C”-rated parks in relation to demographic data
from the Open Space Master Plan.
PACS Commission CIP Recommendations (as voted on March 12):
Add Marina View Park (sand replacement and sidewalks) to FY 26/27 priorities (6–0, 1
absent)
Add Wilson Park (restrooms) to FY 26/27 priorities (5–1, 1 absent)
Add Community Gardens ($50,000) to FY 27/28 CIP and pursue a teaching garden at Neth
Park (6–0, 1 absent)
Add Westside Park Development ($400,000) to FY 27/28 CIP (5–1, 1 absent)
Prioritize “C” rated parks within the 5-year CIP (5–1, 1 absent)
For Fairview Park and Skate Park projects, explore reducing City funding and pursuing
alternative funding sources (4–2, 1 absent)
Accept all other Staff recommendations as presented in the Draft CIP.
Overall, the Commission’s focus was to ensure that limited resources are directed toward parks with the
greatest safety needs and highest impact for underserved communities, while also being thoughtful
about long-term investment strategy.
Thank you for your time and continued support of our work we do on behalf of Costa Mesa residents. We
look forward to working closely with you on these matters.
Sincerely,
Kelly Anne Brown, PhD and Shayanne Wright
Chair, District 5 Vice Chair, At-Large
Parks and Community Services (PACS) Guiding Values
How does a governmental body make informed decisions about funding parks projects
for their community? By ensuring that they evaluate potential projects in line with values
that help promote community wellness throughout Costa Mesa. The Commission has
identified five key values to be considered when evaluating and prioritizing park projects.
The first two values are foundational values as they stretch across all park projects, and
should be understood as a keystone to other values.
1. Community-centered planning and engagement
2. Equity and access
3. Sustainability
4. Safety and maintenance
5. Creativity and innovation
Foundational: Community-centered planning and engagement
Park projects that center and engage community voices create greater investment in
and preservation of local spaces, result in less waste, and demonstrate that Costa Mesa
government values the voices of its citizens.
Attention to: Strong communications that include ample time for outreach and thoughtful
internal analysis; a multi-modal communications strategy (including opt-in text message
threads alongside online and in person activities) that thinks outside the traditional closed
loop of social media followers; following through on communication s throughout the life
cycle of a project | Proceed slow and steady – privilege processes that involve voices
early, over time, and on topics that genuinely benefit from engagement. Avoid “feel good”
processes that don’t knowingly lead to impactful public inclusion | Engage different
demographics across the City where they are, and in the ways that they need | Attentive
to language diversity at every point of contact | Utilize cross-Commission collaboration
around shared project interests.
Local example of excellence: Shalimar Park.
Foundational: Equity and Access
Public parks are for everyone. Always. Decisions made for one park should be
considered as part of a holistic park strategy that recognizes different needs, equitably.
Attention to: Parks that represent and reflect neighborhood needs and personality | Park
project decisions based upon the Park Needs Assessment, with attention to areas with
longstanding unmet needs and citywide inequities | Equipment that supports differently
abled as a necessary element in park (re)designs | Signage that reflects the evolving
linguistic diversity of Costa Mesa | Responds to and predicts needs around the impact of
high-density housing | Recognizes the varied needs according to different economic
considerations, including renters, seniors, and lower-income citizens | Supports the range
of ages from birth to our most senior of citizens, with attention to particular populations,
like teens, that may not always be as visible.
Sustainability
Promote and ensure the long-term environmental health for generations of Costa Mesans
(people, pets, wildlife, and plants) and the land we live on as part of a climate resilience
strategy that stretches across all areas of City government.
Attention to: Utilizing green technology (like solar and stormwater) as we maintain and
rebuild park infrastructure | Promote education and new work processes around
sustainability that utilizes local expertise like environmental organizations, and that
speaks to varied community interests | Transition to using solely native and/or drought-
resistant plants. Though grass may be utilized in some parks, move away from an
overreliance on grass. | Increase and support indigenous wildlife (through bat boxes and
butterfly gardens, for example) | Staying up to date with research regarding which trees
will be able to withstand our changing climate conditions.
Safety and Maintenance
Supporting the safety and maintenance of park infrastructure requires consistent
investment.
Attention to: Improving safety features like lighting and signage | Consider long-term
maintenance needs and issues of durability | Incorporate appropriate landscape design
and plant choices | Promoting healthy tree growth early, and consistently, to protect public
safety | Address immediate safety concerns | Develop an inspection regime to help assure
the safety of all park equipment | Utilize Park Ranger knowledge to mitigate hazardous
activities.
Creativity and Innovation
Strive to be a leader in community parks by pushing at the boundaries of what’s possible,
utilizing innovative technologies as well as time-tested knowledge and traditions.
Attention to: Continue developing Costa Mesa’s uniqueness through its parks, and
embrace the city’s motto at a scale that speaks to the variety of creative hubs in the city |
Utilize nature’s strengths to minimize additional/unnecessary work | Prioritize grant
opportunities that fund art projects for local artists and residents to increase park
ownership and pride | Recognizing that innovation often comes from collaboration,
develop processes for parks that necessitate cross-Commission collaboration and
learning from others | Ensure that preservation and innovation work in tandem | Consider
botanical parks, and their educative functions, as a model for what can be achieved in a
park space that has layers of history and experiences | Set and maintain limits for privacy-
invading technologies (such as drones in parks).
PACS Park Project Evaluation Rubric (Weighted)
Value Weight Score Scale Criteria
1. Community-
Centered
Planning &
Engagement
×2 0–4 4 – Exemplary: Robust outreach (multi-modal, diverse demographics, language inclusion, follow-through, cross-Commission collaboration). 3 – Strong: Multiple outreach methods, inclusive but not fully comprehensive. 2 – Adequate: Some outreach but limited in scope. 1 – Minimal: Token outreach with little impact. 0 – Not Demonstrated: No community engagement.
2. Equity & Access ×2 0–4 4 – Exemplary: Equitable across neighborhoods; ADA elements; multilingual signage; amenities for all ages; prioritizes underserved. 3 – Strong: Considers equity and accessibility with some gaps. 2 – Adequate: General access but limited intentionality. 1 – Minimal: Accessibility addressed superficially. 0 – Not Demonstrated: No equity or access evident.
3. Sustainability ×1 0–4 4 – Exemplary: Green tech, native/drought plants, climate-resilient tree planning, wildlife features, environmental education/partners. 3 – Strong: Includes some sustainable features. 2 – Adequate: Minimal sustainability elements. 1 – Minimal: Sustainability is an afterthought. 0 – Not Demonstrated: None present.
4. Safety &
Maintenance
×1 0–4 4 – Exemplary: Safety features (lighting, signage, inspections); durable design; proactive maintenance plan; Park Ranger input. 3 – Strong: Addressed but with gaps. 2 – Adequate: Some features, inconsistent. 1 – Minimal: Safety only when required. 0 – Not Demonstrated: Not addressed.
5. Creativity &
Innovation
×1 0–4 4 – Exemplary: Embraces creative identity; integrates art, cultural/botanical features; balances innovation/preservation; cross-Commission collaboration. 3 – Strong: Includes creative aspects, not fully integrated. 2 – Adequate: Limited creativity, conventional. 1 – Minimal: Superficial creativity. 0 – Not Demonstrated: No innovation.
Scoring Guide • 25–30 points = Highly Recommended • 19–24 points = Recommended with Revisions • 13–18 points = Needs Major Improvement • 0–12 points = Not Recommended
DRAFT As Presented By Staff 26/27 CIP Recommendations by PACS Commission 26/27
Facilities Facilities PACS Comments
Downtown Aquatic Center Pool Gutter Grates $100,000 Downtown Aquatic Center Pool Gutter Grates $100,000 Approve
Senior Center Facility Improvements $250,000 Senior Center Facility Improvements $250,000 Approve
Streets Streets
Parkway & Median Improvement Program $75,000 Parkway & Median Improvement Program $75,000 Approve
Slush Funds Citywide Tree Maintenance $200,000 Slush Funds Citywide Tree Maintenance $200,000 Approve
Park Parking Lot & Playground Rehab $100,000 Park Parking Lot & Playground Rehab $100,000 Approve
Park Security Lighting $50,000 Park Security Lighting $50,000 Approve
Park Sidewalk Replacement $50,000 Park Sidewalk Replacement $50,000 Approve
Fairview Park Fairview Park
Vernal Pools Restoration $80,000 Vernal Pools Restoration $80,000 Approve
Master Plan Implementation $100,000 Master Plan Implementation $100,000 Disapprove / Cut Back on Allocation
Harper Park Playground Replacement $400,000 Harper Park Playground Replacement $400,000 Approve
Moon Park Community Outreach $50,000 Moon Park Community Outreach $50,000 Approve
Tewinkle Park Skate Park Expansion $500,000 Tewinkle Park Skate Park Expansion $500,000 Disapprove / Cut Back on Allocation
Total $1,955,000 Marina View Park Fill Sand $31,000 Recommend to Add/Prioritize for this Year
Hardscape $21,000 Recommend to Add/Prioritize for this Year
Wilson Park Bathrooms $60,000 Recommend to Add/Prioritize for this Year
Total $2,067,000
Difference between Staff & PACS Recs:$112,000
CIP Recommendations by PACS Commission 5-Year
Neth Park Community Gardens $50,000 Add for FY 27/28
Westide Park Development $400,000 Add for FY 27/28
General Policy Strictly prioritize C-rated parks