Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-19 - Denying Planning Application PA -98-02, 524-A West 19"' St.258 RESOLUTION NO. 98-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION PA -98-02. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, an application was filed by BMA Consulting, authorized agent for Neron Limited, with respect to real property located at 524-A West 19th Street, requesting a conditional use permit to allow automobile heating, electrical, and air conditioning repair in a Downtown Redevelopment Project Area, located within 200 feet of a residential zone, and for retail sales of automobiles at the same location in a C2 zone; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on February 9, 1998; and WHEREAS, the applicant appealed the Planning Commission's action to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on March 16, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the evidence in the record and findings contained in Exhibit "A"; the City Council hereby denies Planning Application PA -98-02 with respect to the property described above. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1998. Q&2 Mayor of the City of 16 AtMesa ATTEST: Deputy City Cl k of the City of Costa Mesa STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF COSTA MESA ) I, MARY T. ELLIOTT, Deputy City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 98-19 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of March, 1998. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 17th day of March, 1998. T - Deputy 00 Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Uuncil of the City of Costa Mesa 1 EXHIBIT "A" FINDINGS A. The information presented does not substantially comply with Costa Mesa Municipal Code section 13-29(g)(2) in that the proposed automotive repair use and retail sales of automobiles are not substantially compatible with developments in the same general area. Specifically, the building is a retail strip center and is not designed for automotive repair. Furthermore, automobile repair activities will generate adverse impacts for residentially - zoned and developed property to the north. Granting the conditional use permit will be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of other properties, residents, and businesses within the immediate vicinity. B. The proposed uses are not consistent with the guidelines of the Redevelopment Plan which specifically discourages such uses. C. An initial study was prepared, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. According to the initial study and negative declaration, which reflect the independent judgment of the City of Costa Mesa, the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. D. The project is exempt from Chapter XII, Article 3, Transportation System Management, of Title 13 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code. E. The evidence presented in the record as a whole indicates that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources or habitat. Exhibit "A" Resolution No. 98-19 Page 1 of 1 259