HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-57 - Denying PA -94-11 (RA -94-04) Stag Bar118
RESOLUTION NO. 94-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING
PLANNING ACTION PA -94-11, REDEVELOPMENT
ACTION RA -94-04.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, an application was filed by William Murdock, authorized agent for Pope
Family Trust, with respect to real property located at 145 East 19th Street, requesting
Conditional Use Permits to legalize expansion of the Stag Bar and to deviate from shared
parking requirements in the Cl zone; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on
March 28, 1994, and a hearing was held by the Redevelopment Agency on May 11, 1994; and
WHEREAS, an interested part filed an appeal of said Planning Commission and
Redevelopment Agency decisions on May 18, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held duly noticed public hearings on June 6, 1994, and
June 20, 1994;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the evidence in the
record and the findings contained in Exhibit "A", the City Council hereby DENIES
Planning Action PA -94-11, Redevelopment Action RA -94-04, with respect to the
property described above.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1994.
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
ATTEST:
Deputy Cit Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, MARY T. ELLIOTT, Deputy City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 94-57 was
duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held
on the 20th day of June, 1994.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 21st day of June, 1994.
Deputy ' y Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of
the City ouncil of the City of Costa Mesa
C
EXHIBIT "A"
PLANNING STAFF FINDINGS
APPL. PA-94-11/RA-94-04
A. The information presented does not substantially comply with
Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-347 in that the proposed
use is not substantially compatible with developments in the
same general area; granting the Conditional Use Permit will be
detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the
public or other properties or improvements within the immedi-
ate vicinity; specifically, the proposed expansion will have
negative impacts on the public safety and on the quality of
life of the residents who live both to the south and east of
the project site. Additionally, pertaining to the deviation
from the shared parking requirements, the business will not
operate at hours differing from the remaining uses on the
site.
B. The project has been reviewed for compliance with the Califor-
nia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and
the City environmental procedures, and has been found to be
exempt from CEQA because the project has no possibility of
causing a significant effect on the environment.
C. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with Article 22h,
Transportation Systems Management, of the Costa Mesa Munici-
pal Code in that no intersection to which the project con-
tributes measurable traffic shall operate at less than the
Standard Level of Service as a result of project implementa-
tion.
Exhibit "A"
Resolution No. 94-57
Page 1 of 1