HomeMy WebLinkAbout176 - Wilson Street Annexation - Intention to Annex265
Fh SOUITION NC. 176
A PESOLL TTOi' OF T^E CITY COD VCTL OF TBL CITY OF COSTA YESA, CALTFOPNIA,
OF-NTENTTON TO ANNEX, ANF GTVT'"G NOTTCE THEIEOF.
51BEFEAS, there `s situated outside and contiguous to the City of Costa
Mesa a certain uninhabited area as heiei.nafter more particularly described; and
WH1'IEAS, the owners of over one-half of the land one the territory by
area and by assessed valuat'on as s'qown on the last eq,alized assessment roll
in the County of Orange have expressed themselves as desirous of having the same
annexed with the City of Costa Mesa, and
YiHE?-LAS, it wol.,ld be for the best interests of the City of Costa Mesa to
annex the said hereinafter described property, and
'viHEFLAS, there has been submitted on or about the 11th day of October,
1955, to the Orange County Boundary Comc"fission a legal description and plat of
the said hereinafter uninhabited area, for its approval, pursuant to Section 35002
of the Government Code of the State of California; and
l,Hl,1 EAS, the approval of said Oranve County Boundary Commission has been
secured and renorted upon by the Boundary Commission with respect to the de£inite-
ness and the certainty of the proposed boundaries;
NOW, THIIEFOPE, BE TT IESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Costa
Mesa, a Cit- of the Sixth Class, to annex the said real property as hereinafter
described, which said real property is contiguous to the present boundaries of
saa_d City of Costa r'esa, and wh;.ch pr�nerty is, at the present time, uninhabited.
NCTTCE TS HLILBY GIVEN that it is proposed by the said City of Costa Mesa
to annex the hereinafter described real property to the City of Costa Mesa,
which said real property shall, in these proceedings, bear the name "Wilson Street
Annexation". The specific description of the boundaries of the territory pro-
posed to be annexed are as follows:
"Beginning at a point in the existing City Boundary line
of the City of Costa Mesa, said point being the intersection
of the West line of Placentia Avenue, formerly Meyer Street,
with the centerline of Wilson Street as shown on a map of
Tract No. 9, recorded in Book p, page C. Miscellaneous Maps,
records of Orange County, California; thence Westerly along
said centerline of Wilson Street and the existing City Boundary
line to the So,.:therly prolongation of the West line of Lot 34
of said Tract No. 9; thence Northerly along said West line
of Lot 34, its Northerly prclonRati.on ane the existing City
Boundary line to the North line of the alley, 12 feet in
width lying Nnitherly of and adjoining said Lot 34; thence
leaving said City Houndary line and running thence Easterly
1266
along said North line of the alley to a point in the existing
City Boundary line, said point being, the intersection of said
North line of the alley with the Northerly prolongation of the
East line of said Lot 34, said East line beinc also the West
line of said Placentia Avenue; thence Southerly along said
Northerly prolongation, said East line of Lot 34, and the exist-
ing City Boundary line to the point of beginning."
PJRTHEE NOTICE, IS HJILLY GIVEN that on the 28th day of November, 1055,
at the hour of 7:30 P ., on said day, or as soon thereafter as the matter may
be heard, at the Council meeting at the Justice Court of Newport Beach Judicial
District, 567 West Eighteenth Street, Costa Mesa, California, a hearing will
be had, at which hearing the City Council shall hear and pass upon all written
protests filed at any tire before said hour set for said hearing by any person
owning real property within the territory so proposed to be annexed, and at any
time before the ho -r set for said hearing an,,, owner of property within the terr-
itory proposed to be annexed may file a written protest against the annexation.
The protest shall set forth the name of the owner of the property affected and
give a description of said property in general terms.
The Cit!, Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa is hereby a--. thorized and direct-
ed to cause a copy of this Resolution to be piblished once a week for two weeks
prior to said hearing in the Costa Mesa Globe -Herald, a newspaper of general
circulation, p, . bl'shed in the City of Costa Mesa, and also in the Santa Ana Fee-
ister, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Orange
and outside the City of Costa Mesa.
The City Clerk is further a:thorized and directed to mail a written
notice of the proposed annexation to all persors to whpm land proposed to be
annexed is assessed in the last available eonal`zed assessment roll at the address
shown thereon or as known to said City Clerk.
The above and foregoing les�lution was d, 17, and regi larly passed and
ad,pted at a re, -lar reetinp or the Cit, Council of the City of Costa Mesa held
on the 7th day of November, 1^55, by the following vote, to -wit:
AYES: COt NCTL!111! Martin, Nelson, Smith, Finkley and Te4iinkle
NOLS: COUNCILpLN None
ABSLPIT COUNCTL"SEN None
ATTEST:
a
City Clerk of the City of Coot- Mesa
-ayor of the Cit7, of Costa Mesa
i
J
i
STATE CF CAT?FOPJA)
)ss
CO[ TJ77 CF OFANGB )
T, A. C. S6AFTZ, City Clerk fthe Cit}- of Costa N,esa, do hereby certify
Scat the foregoinp Resolution No. 176 was duly and regularly passed and adopted
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Costa Iesa held on the
7th day November, 1955.
TN KTNESS WHEFEOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 7th day
of November, 19$5.
,a
J
�G.Co- d
City Clerk and ex -officio erk of the
City Council of the City of Costa Mesa
267