HomeMy WebLinkAbout66-74 - Paularino No. 11 Annexation - Application to L.A.F.C.RESOLUTION NO. 66-74
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMA-
TION COMMISSION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
(a) That the Local Agency Formation Commission did on the
9th day of June, 1966, present the legal description of the
proposed annexation Paularino No. 11 to the County Surveyor for
checking and the same having been found reasonably definite and
certain, and
(b) That the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa does
hereby find and determine:
1. That the property proposed to be annexed to the
City of Costa Mesa is uninhabited, is contiguous to the boundaries
of the City of Costa Mesa.
2. That the territory to be annexed is designated as
Paularino No. 11 and the legal description of the property is as
follows:
"A parcel of land lying within Lots 133 and 134,
Block 7 of Irvine's Subdivision in the County of
Orange, State of California, as shown on a map
thereof, recorded in book 1, page 88 of Miscellaneous
Maps, records of Orange County, California, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the existing boundary of
the City of Costa Mesa as described in the Paul-
arino No. 4 Annexation to the City of Costa Mesa,
Ordinance No. 355, adopted April 17, 1961, said
point being the intersection of the center line
of Paularino Avenue, 60 feet in width, as granted
to the County of Orange by deed, recorded April 2,
1940, in book 1042, page 96 of Official Records of
said Orange County, with the Southeasterly line of
Newport Avenue, 60 feet in width, as granted to the
County of Orange by deed, recorded in book 250, page
73 of Book of Deeds; thence North 40° 37' 45" East
along said Southeasterly line and said existing
boundary and the existing boundary of the City of
Costa Mesa as described in the Paularino No. 1
Annexation to the City of Costa Mesa, Ordinance No.
283, adopted January 11, 1960, a distance of 2116.48
feet to the Easterly prolongation of the Northerly
line of Lot 4, Berry Rancho, as shown on a map there-
of, recorded in book 9, page 7 of Miscellaneous
Records of Los Angeles County, California; thence
departing from said Southeasterly line and said exist-
ing boundary South 85° 35' 15" East, 1070.52 feet to
the Westerly terminus of that certain course described
as "North 680 02' 08" West, 453.49 feet" in the
southerly righteof way line of the San Diego Freeway;
thence South 68 02' 08" East along said Southerly
right of way line, 453.49 feet; thence South 850 26' 04"
East, 119.06 feet to the center line of Red Hill
Avenue, 100.00 feet in width, as granted to the County
M
of Orange by deed, recorded in book 7148, page 205 of
Official Records; thence degarting from said Southerly
right of way line, South 40 37' 45" West along said
center line of Red Hill Avenue, 3003.26 feet to the
center line of previously mentioned Paularino Avenue
and the existing boundary of the City of Costa Mesa
as described in the Paularino No. 7 Annexation to the
City of Costa Mesa, Ordinance No. 65-8, adopted
April S. 1965; thence departing from said center line
of Red Hill Avenue, North 49° 21' 09" West along said
center line of Paularino Avenue and said existing
boundary, 1410.00 feet to the point of beginning."
3. That the reason for the proposed annexation is that
the territory is ready for development and that City services are
necessary for the protection of health, safety and welfare of
the developers and that the City of Costa Mesa is the agency
most feasible to provide said facilities to said area.
4. That there are no special terms or conditions to
the proposed annexation.
S. That the agencies effected by said annexation, to
the best of applicants' knowledge, are as follows:
County Sanitary District No. 7
Orange County Flood Control District
Harbor District
Mosquito Abatement District
County Library District
Metropolitan Water District
Santa Ana School District
6. That attached hereto and made a part of this
Resolution as Exhibit "A" is a map of the territory proposed to
be annexed.
7. That all notices with respect to hearings should
be mailed to the following persons:
A. R. McKenzie, City Manager, City Hall, Costa
Mesa
Roy E. June, City Attorney, 1500 Adams Street,
Suite 206, Costa Mesa
Don Southworth, City of Costa Mesa Engineer,
116 East 18th Street, Costa Mesa.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 1966.
411
t/
ayor o t e y1 Costa mesa
ATTEST:
1L' ty eC1�f ne ity or osta esa
201
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, C. K. PRIEST, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa
and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa
Mesa, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution
No. 66-74 was introduced and considered section by section at a
regular meeting of the said City Council held on the 15th day
of August, 1966, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole
at a regular meeting of the said City Council held on the 15th
day of August, 1966, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen: Barck, Wilson, Tucker, Pinkley, Jordan
NOES: Councilmen: None
ABSENT: Councilmen: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa, this 16th day of
August, 1966. - Q
L��v
City ClerK and ex-orticio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Costa Mesa.