Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout79-135 - General Plan Amendment GP-78-3A, Master Plan of Highways AmendmentRESOLUTION NO. 79-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP -78-3A, REVISED, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, AND AMENDING THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 65357 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER PLAN OF HIGHWAYS FOR THE CITY OF COSTA MESA. WHEREAS, the General Plan 1990, as amended, was adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa by Resolution No. 71-27 on April 5, 1971; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment GP -78-3A, Revised, a plan to change the proposed land use designation for property located 1,300 feet east of Bristol Street, south of Sunflower Avenue, west of Main Street and the Costa Mesa Freeway, and north of the San Diego Freeway has been recommended for adoption by the Costa Mesa Planning Commission; and - WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa the Tenth Amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan in accordance with Section 65302 of the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the Costa Mesa Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment GP -78-3A and the Tenth Amendment to the Circula- tion Element of the General Plan as detailed in their Resolution No. PC -79-15 adopted on the 8th day of October, 1979, attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and by this reference made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, public hearing was duly held in accordance with Section 65355 of the Government Code of the State of California, all persons having been given the opportunity to be heard, both for and against said Amendment GP -783A and said Tenth Amendment to the Circulation Element of said General Plan; and WHEREAS, this City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City that said Tenth Amendment to the Circulation Element and said Amendment GP -78-3A to the Land Use Element be adopted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa that said Tenth Amendment to the Circulation Element of said General Plan, in accordance with Section 65302 of the Government Code of the State of California be, and the same is hereby adopted by said City Council as follows: adopt Option IV -D, attached hereto marked Exhibit "B", and by this reference made a part hereof; designating Sunflower Avenue, Anton Boulevard, and Flower Street as primary highways, and the connector street between Anton Boulevard and Main Street as a commuter highway on the Master Plan of Highways; determining that the alignment of Anton Boulevard as shown on the revised Staff Proposal, attached hereto marked Exhibit "B", may not be necessarily specifically followed as shown, but may possibly be moved northerly; and approving acquisition of right-of-way necessary to construct dual left turns at the intersection of Sunflower Avenue and Flower Street. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said General Plan is hereby amended by H the adoption of General Plan Amendment GP -78-3A, modifying the Land Use Option recommended by the Planning Commission shown on Table 2, attached hereto marked Exhibit "C", and by this reference made a part hereof, said modifications being outlined in the Minute Resolution attached hereto marked Exhibit "D", and by this reference made a part hereof. The Land Use Element is hereby amended to designate that portion of the subject property north and west of the extension of Anton Boulevard from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential, and that portion south and east of the extension of Anton Boulevard from Low Density Residential to Commercial Center. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1979. Ma�or of the Citfy of costa e a ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Costa Me ol STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF COSTA MESA ) I, EILEEN P. PHINNEY, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and fore- going Resolution No. 79-135 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of November, 1979. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 20th day of November, 1979. City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of e City council of the City of Costa sa RESOLUTION NO. PC -79-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, GP -78-3A (REVISED) TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT RELATING TO THE DESIGNATION OF SUNFLOWER AVENUE, THE ALIGN- MENTS OF THE ANTON BOULEVARD AND FLOWER STREET EXTENSIONS AND THE ADDITION OF A COMMUTER STREET CONNECTION BETWEEN THE ANTON BOULEVARD EXTENSION AND MAIN STREET AND ALSO TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED 1,300 FEET EAST OF BRISTOL STREET, SOUTH OF SUNFLOWER AVENUE, WEST OF MAIN STREET AND THE COSTA MESA FREEWAY AND NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGO FREEWAY FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CENTER. THE COSTA MESA PLANNING COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: THAT, WHEREAS, purusant to applicable provisions of the California Government Code, Title 7, Chapter 3, the Costa Mesa Planning Commission has processed and reviewed a proposed amendment to the General Plan of the City of Costa Mesa as designated herein; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65351, said Planning Commission herewith transmits its recommendations to the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as found, determined and decided upon at the duly noticed public hearing thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based upon the findings as set forth in the staff report and the public hearing thereon held on October 8, 1979, the Application for the General Plan Amendment GP -78-3A (Revised) be, and is hereby recommended for approval to amend the Circula- tion Element of the General Plan by upgrading the designation of Sunflower Avenue between Bristol and Main Streets from a Secondary to a Primary Highway, to amend the alignments of the Flower Street and Anton Boulevard extension and to add an east/west Commuter Highway between the Anton Boulevard extension and Main Street as appear on a map attached to this Resolution marked Exhibit "A" and by this specific reference made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that based upon the findings as set forth in the staff report and the public hearing theron held on October 8, 1979, the Application for General Plan Amendment GP -78-3A (Revised) be, and is hereby recommended for approval to amend the General Plan Land Use Element designation of property located approximately 1,300 feet east of Bristol Street, south of Sunflower Avenue, west of Main Street and north of the Anton Boulevard extension and the Anton -Main connector Street from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and to amend the General Plan Land Use Element designation of property located approximately 1,300 feet east of Bristol Street, south of the Anton Boulevard extension and the Anton -Main connector street, west of the Costa Mesa Freeway and north of the San Diego Freeway from Low Density Residential to Commercial Center. Also the alignment of the Anton Boulevard extension shall be designed to provide approximately 84 acres within the High Density Residential desig- nation and approximately 60 acres within the Commercial Center designation of which approximately one-third of the area shall be reserved for research and development, corporate headquarters and industrial uses. Also, the proposed neighborhood commercial center shall be located within the High Density Residential designation, the exact location to be determined in the development plan review phase; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an amendment to the Planned Development Commercial (PDC) Zone be, and is hereby recommended for approval to allow research and development and corporate headquarter -type industrial uses in the PDC Zone as conditional uses; and EXHIBIT "A" for Resolution No. 79-135 Page 1 of 3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Park Dedication Ordinance is hereby recommended for amendment to allow full credit for private recrea- tion facilities and areas when public access is guaranteed and when the private facilities are determined to be feasible and usable as park facilities; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant's offer to dedicate an approximately 30,000 square foot site for the construction of a new fire station (exact location to be determined by the Fire Department) be, and is hereby recommended for acceptance. Also, it is recommended that other developers in the same general area of the City share in the costs of providing the additional fire station; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Items A, B, C, D and E on Pages 16 and 17 of the October 1979 General Plan Review Report be, and are hereby recommended for approval as General Plan Implementation Guidelines for GP -78-3A, with the following sentence added to Paragraph D on Page 17: "Ten percent of the for sale or rent housing units shall be made available first to employees working in the area."; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the commercially designated portion of the property is recommended for rezoning to the Planned Development Commer- cial (PDC) Zone and that the residentially designated portion of the property is recommended for rezoning to the Planned Development Residential - High Density (PDR -HD) Zone. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of October, 1979. Chairman, Costa Mesa Planning Commission I, DOUGLAS K. CLARK, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. PC -79-15 was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Costa Mesa Planning Commission which was held on the 8th day of October, 1979, and carried by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Carstensen, Lorenzini, Clarke, DiDomenico, Thyen NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None Acting Secretary, Costa Mesa Planning Commmission APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY BY: Assistant City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Development Services Director EXHIBIT "A" for Resolution No. 79-135 Page 2 of 3 Rt�u.tTlo►� No. Pc --7A. 15w EXI�fIN4 G�RLULAT1dJ EI.EM6►JT ( AAp, PUR pl.AQ W 141414WAY,6) VWOMMO'1* n AMMI�MMKyrS /r EXHIBIT "A" for Resolution No. 79-135 Page 3 of 3 GE ht tt.jo• .to ... �� Mw... .06 ucoro.•, u.... — eor,,116 too ..! — — — Mr• 'jY.► Lod - GP-78-3AlREv-1 CIRCULATION OPTIONS V. wised Staff Proposal FDA 06"19 "W V. Revised Royale Proposal I iulm — �, D%W4o WWI EXHIBIT "B" for Resolution No. 79-135 il EI �l F- �V�I ippJ tf1 Y �I O8 88 ^m IC^ Q7� CV N N t+lM lGA Nt''11 V LNO ^VM Mtf, o a c o = dirn r{ Lob ffi ^L aU� O m a _ N7 Nm .!U1 m8 t Np' O m. -O O In f7 Ha a a �m Na o0 00 0o moi moi moi c Ludo rntad 3�9 F.9 ae r ° rn • c uo , 'uppf"S1 .• • ^ vo tml � ao� FI G, 10- y N D l7 ppMti M: M pL- pp�L1 19 NtlnN Ni�o' IIvy� n N r) totpps fv FI rwi O O N ^ ^ al m L M C, M t0 tNp m� O M � ry (p O OL 7 LL C) ON ^ ^ O (tp0 m) ^ p(}t Mj N^ v Z _ •Y --- rn tp m L o m tri m ^ L o m tri tQ N d� O In n fI��1 V I`1 o rn m — pmt m a E t» od m to to m ui eo i R R LLco ^ ra ILov � V f'1 rj b v M L d U1 Ij o o turn ! �N �Nri N IR -L -Lm to cot LL U� NNv fV N N N N Z t,m V O ttv0 L LQ] mW N mill t(10 O N N^.- w C cl'1 rn of m m rn v In cY r{ Yi vi rn to a rn N rn ^ w N N to m M M t1 m L C) ' rn ar m m In tf1 II) U) 1 m N m .- L i a 9 w7 ! > = m Ln I r z w II, =rr.III i- �: LU OX OJ Z -' OOJ Z� OX Z 111 Om N7 U W !� _- �O F -a !; Ol7 all af9 aZ co aZ a0 U- CL ° Z O Z ZQO ] OZ OZ O O O O O�W OO OI- J l7 !t N U) I V7 7 z Z Q w Jul Q cc a' U X X X Q Q LLI W W t F- EXCERPT MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa was held on November 19, 1979, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: McFarland, Schafer, Raciti, Hertzog, Hall COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "On motion by Councilman Hall, seconded by Vice Mayor Schafer, and carried, a modification of the Land Use Option recommended by the Planning Commission shown on Table 2 was adopted, calling for 74 acres to be developed for High Density Residential; and 70 acres for Commercial Center with further direc- tion that approximately 20 acres of this area be devoted to research and development, corporate headquarters, and industrial uses, with variance of up to 10 percent since acreage is not exact. On motion by Councilman Hall, seconded by Mayor McFarland, and carried, staff was directed to initiate an amendment to the PDC zone, to allow Research and Development and Light Industrial uses. On motion by Councilman Hall, seconded by Vice Mayor Schafer, and carried, staff was directed to initiate an amendment to the Park Dedication Ordinance to allow full credit for private facilities if public access is guaranteed. On motion by Councilman Hall, seconded by Vice Mayor Schafer, and carried, an amendment was adopted to allow densities in excess of 30 units per acre. A motion was made by Vice Mayor Schafer, seconded by Councilman Hall, to hold the fire station issue in abeyance for 90 days. The motion carried unanimously. On motion by Councilman Hall, seconded by Vice Mayor Schafer, and carried, Project Phasing, as outlined on Page 16 of the document entitled "October 1979 General Plan Review", was adopted. On motion by Vice Mayor Schafer, seconded by Council- woman Hertzog, and carried, Construction Timing, as outlined on Page 16 of the document entitled "October 1979 General Plan Review", was adopted. On motion by Vice Mayor Schafer, seconded by Councilwoman Hertzog, and carried, Transportation System Management (TSM), as detailed on Page 16 of the docu- ment entitled "October 1979 General Plan Review", was adopted. Considerable discussion was held concerning Housing Opportunities, after which a motion was made by Mayor McFarland, seconded by Councilman Hall, determining that the developer commit to work with the City to explore various ways of providing affordable housing on the subject property; and reserve 10 percent of the housing for employees in the area. The motion carried unanimously. On motion by Vice Mayor Schafer, seconded by Councilman Hall, and carried, Energy Consumption, as outlined on Page 17 of the document entitled "October 1979 General Plan Review", was adopted. On recommendation of the Planning Commission, Residential Density Limitation was eliminated. On motion by Vice Mayor Schafer, seconded by Councilwoman Hertzog, and carried, a determination was made that the Council may require extension of Anton Boulevard to connect with Sunflower Avenue when warranted by traffic impacts, and said extension may be required with any phase of development." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjournment: The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 11:05 p.m. ------------------- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF COSTA MESA ) I, EILEEN P. PHINNEY, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of the minute entry on record in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 27th day of December, 1979. EXHIBIT "D" for Resolution No. 79-135 City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk the City Council of the City of Cost Mesa EXHIBIT "D" for Resolution No. 79-135