Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout85-83 - Adopting SP-85-011,'41Q ; RESOLUTION NO. 85-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN SP -85-01 FOR PROPERTY BORDERED BY EAST 16TH STREET, NEWPORT BOULEVARD, EAST 17TH STREET, AND ORANGE AVENUE, EXCLUDING PROPERTIES AT 175-195 EAST 17TH STREET AND AT 1683-87 ORANGE AVENUE. WHEREAS, there has been presented to the Costa Mesa City Council a Specific Plan for the 1600 block of Newport Boulevard, excepting properties located at 175-195 East 17th Street and at 1683-87 Orange Avenue; and WHEREAS, Section 65450 of the Government Code enables local govern- ments to adopt Specific Plans for the systematic implementation of their General Plans; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study of Environmental Impacts has been completed and a Negative Declaration prepared; and WHEREAS, the Costa Mesa Planning Ccimmission has recommended adoption of said Specific Plan by Resolution PC -85-07, adopted May 13, 1985; and WHEREAS, public hearings on the adoption of said Specific Plan were duly held and conducted by the Costa Mesa City Council on June 3 and September 3, 1985; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after hearing all the evidence, deemed it to be in the best interest of the City that said Specific Plan be approved, ratified, and adopted as amended in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa that said Specific Plan SP -85-01, as amended, for properties bordered by East 16th Street, Newport Boulevard, East 17th Street, and Orange Avenue, except for properties at 175-195 East 17th Street and at 1683-87 Orange Avenue, is hereby approved, ratified, and adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Negative Declaration prepared for said Specific Plan be, and is hereby adopted. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of September, 1985. ATTEST: v a-E y Clerk of the City Aof sta Me May of the City to Mesa STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF COSTA MESA ) I, EILEEN P. PHINNEY, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and fore- going Resolution No. 85-83 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 3rd day of September, 1985. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 4th day of September, 1985. ' p Ci y Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of tof City Council of the City of Costa &a 144 EXHIBIT "A" Resolution No. 85-83 The following alternatives, contained in the Planning staff's report, 11SP-85-01 - Council Action Alternatives", were adopted: Item 1, the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. Item 2b, authorizing the rezone of existing C2 properties to CL, excluding trailer parks. Item 3b, authorizing existing R2 zoning to be retained on a short -terns basis and that these parcels shall be rezoned to commercial use per the criteria listed under Item 5b, excluding trailer park sites. Item 4, directing staff to investigate a new mobile home/trailer park zoning category, setting forth alternatives for such a category, and to report back to Council as soon as possible. Item 5a, authorizing the rezone of CL properties to Cl if the parcels are 18,000 square feet with 150 feet of street frontage, and if there is access to 16th or 17th Streets; or, CL properties may be rezoned to PDC if all parcels south or north of the trailer parks are combined, there is access to 16th or 17th Streets, and a Preliminary Development Plan is submitted with the rezone application. Item 5b, establishing the following criteria for existing R2 properties: permit rezone to AP if the parcel size is 18,000 square feet; permit rezone to Cl if parcels are combined with existing C2 properties and meet the criteria under Item 5a; permit rezone to PDC if parcels are combined with existing C2 properties and meet criteria under Item 5a. Item 5c, Trailer Park Sites: no action was taken. Item 6a, Building Height Standards for the PDC Zone: no action was taken. Item 7b, no building intensity standards were adopted for the PDC zone; Council will rely on present standards for setbacks, height limits, and parking requirements. Item 8a, applying additional development standards to cammercial develop- ments adjacent to trailer parks by requiring eight -foot high block walls, landscaping, and building orientation (such as, windows not directly facing the trailer parks, and investigating shade and shadow impacts). Item 9, Requirements for Conversion of Trailer Parks: Council delayed a decision until after the mobile home/trailer park study has been completed by staff.