HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-55 - Surplus Funds in Assessment District 82-1, Sterling AvenueRESOLUTION NO. 87-55
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING A DECLARATION
REGARDING SURPL[B IN THE IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR
ASSES,9IENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1/STERLING AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa has conducted
proceedings and conpleted construction of certain public improvements in a
special assessment district, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" ( the "Act") , being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special assess-
ment district known arra designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82-1/STERLING
AVENUE (hereinafter referred tb as the "Assessment District"); and
WHEREAS, City staff has prepared a Summary of Expenditures for the
Assessment District, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which summary gives a
breakdown of each class and type of expense, including construction items
arra incidentals, together with the totals thereof, arra a reconciliation
with the final Engineer's Report fior the Assessment District; and
WiEREAS, this City Council desires to make certain findings and
declarations concernirg the construction status of the improvements and
payment therefor under the Assessment District proceedings, all pursuant to
the requirements of the Act and specifically Section 10427 thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA does hereby
resolve as follows:
SDCTION 1. The above recitals and each of them are true and correct.
SECTION 2. The public improvements, as set forth and described in the
Resolution of Intention for these proceedings, have been completed to the
satisfaction of this Council, and all payment has either been made or set
aside for all existing or potential claims, costs, arra expenses.
SECTION 3. The Summary of Expenditures, as herein referenced, is
hereby accepted by this City Council as the final tabulation of costs and
resources of payment thereof.
SECTION 4. The Treasurer is hereby directed to pay all claims arra
to transfer such noneys as may be needed to make up any deficit in the
Improvement Fund from the General Fund of the City, and to thereafter close
and terminate the Improvement Fund for the Assessment District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 1987.
ATTEST:
L
i y Clerk of the City of Costa sa a the Cfty of Costa
STATE CF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY CF COSTA MESA )
I, EILEEN P. PHINNEY City Clerk arra ex -officio Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and fore-
going Resolution No. 87-55 was duly arra regularly passed and adopted by
the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of
June, 1987.
IN WITNESS WHERECF, I have hereunto set my hart] and affixed the Seal
of the City of Costa Mesa this 16th day of June, 1987.
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk o the
City Council of the City of Cost esa
At this time, approximately 2 1/2 years following
construction, it has been determined that the preceeding can be
finalized as follows:
Actual Construction Costs
As per the 6th and Final Progress Payment of September 11,
1984, a total cost of $111,905.00 was paid to Porter Construction.
. . . Continued
Re: Summary of Expenditures for Assessment District No.
82-1(S erling Avenue)
The following is a detailed summary of expenditures and a
sequence of actions relating to the Assessment District in an
attempt to determine the surplus, if any, remaining in the
Improvement Fund accounts.
City Contribution:
The original estimated contribution of $99,790 as stated
Resolution of Intent No. 83-42 on May 16, 1983 was changed to
$104,692 per City Resolution No. 83-76. The final contribution of
'
$104,692 was set forth in the final engineer's report dated July
1983.
o rt
rn
Assessment Total:
C
Following the bid opening the Assessment Engineer established
a confirmed cost for Sterling Avenue of $114,506.50 with 108
contingencies amounting to $11,450.50 totaling to $125,957 for
construction.
With the confirmed incidental expenses amounting to $111,473
it was determined that the total project cost would amount to
$237,430. Less the City contribution the total amount to assess
was $132,738.
Review of Final Report
A.) Construction Costs for Sterling Avenue $125,957.00
B.) Incidental Expenses 111,473.00
Total Project Costs $237,430.00
C.) Less Contribution by City (104,692.00)
Total to Assessment $132,738.00
Note: Part III - Project Cost Estimate from Final Report of July
1983 attached for reference.
At this time, approximately 2 1/2 years following
construction, it has been determined that the preceeding can be
finalized as follows:
Actual Construction Costs
As per the 6th and Final Progress Payment of September 11,
1984, a total cost of $111,905.00 was paid to Porter Construction.
. . . Continued
Page Two
Actual Engineering and Inspection Costs
Reviewing Account No. 1710000005, a total of $61,290.04 was
paid to BSI, of this amount $5,731.54 was for the overlay of
Palace Avenue. Corrections establish a total of $55,558.50 was
for Sterling Avenue.
Actual Soils Engineering
LaBelle performed the testing for a total amount of $1,630.00
Ln
tn
r
Actual Property Appraisal Costs
o
MacMillin and Associates performed all appraisals for a total
amount of $12,100.
Actual Litigation Expenses
Nazarek, Harper and Hopkins has supplied legal expertise on
an hourly cost basis with a total to date amount of $3,277.50.
Actual Land Value
At the present time a total of $20,345 has been paid for
settlements and title insurance. In the immediate future a
$2,170.00 credit will be sent from the County Clerk, establishing
a final cost of $18,175.00
Actual Bond Counsel Expenses
The legal expertise for the bond sale was furnished by Brown
and Nazarek for a total cost of $2,654.75.
Actual Bond Printing Costs
Jefferies Banknotes Corporation was paid $1,646.72 for
printing costs. A credit of $353.82 should apply, since the
10/17/83 payment to the City of $2,000.00 was in excess of actual
costs.
Actual Bond Discount
A review of the payment record for the Assessment District
indicates only 15 owners elected to pay their assessed costs by
September 1, 1984. The total prepaid amount of $35,458.92
designates a credit of only $1,595.65 to the $5,973 Bond discount
leaving an expenditure of $4,377.
Actual Miscellaneous Expenses
These costs consisted of petty cash payments and blueprinting
amount to $254.11. Closer investigation indicates the Xeroxing
costs for the specifications have not been included, it's
estimated that $250 will cover this item. A projected cost of
$504.11 is appropriate.
. . . Continued
Page Three
Actual Contract Administration
A review of Labor distribution costs for this period indicate
� a total of $2,719.59.
m
ro Actual City Administration
m s'� The projected costs of $2,289 is for the service of the bonds
rt as stated in the June 12, 1986 memo from the Revenue Division.
O _
rn
J
Ln
Un
Page Four
Sunvery
Confirmed Actual
A) Construction $125,957 $111,795*
B) Incidentals -
Design Engineering
18,462
19,305
Design Survey
7,930
7,930
Soils Engineering
1,630
1,630
Assessment Engineer
11,421
11,421
R/W Engineering
6,003
6,003
Property Appriasal
7,500
12,100
Litigation Expense
12,000
3,278
Land Value
18,300
18,175
City Administration
51000
2,289
Bond Counsel
2,519
3,655**
Contract Administration
720
2,720
Construction Survey
-0-
-0-
Construction Inspection
10,900
101900
Bond 6 Misc. Printing
2,000
1,647
Bond Discount
5,973
4,377
Miscellaneous Expenses
1,115
504
Total Incidentals $111,473 $105,934
Total Project Cost 237,430 $?17,729
Less City Contribution (104,692) (81,332)
$132,738 $136,397
Amount Assessed $132,738
Amount charged to Assessed ($136,397)
Final Balance after close ($ 3,689)
Note: * Reflects a $110 credit form MCWD for adjusting W.V's to grade
** Includes estimated expenditures not paid to date of $1000.00