Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-58 - Directing Two Referendum Petitions Placed on Ballot/11-8-88RESOLUTION NO. 88-58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THAT TWO REFERENDUM PETITIONS BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 1988, GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION. WHEREAS, the City Council has called and given notice for a regular Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 1988; and WHEREAS, a referendum petition on City Council Resolution No. 88-11 and a second referendum petition on City Council Resolution No. 88-44 have been certified as having sufficient signatures to qualify for placing on the ballot for voter consideration; and WHEREAS, the legality of placing these referenda on the ballot is being challenged in a pending lawsuit entitled, "Costa Mesa Residents for Responsible Growth v. City of Costa Mesa, OCSC No. 52-54-40; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa does here- by resolve, declare, determine, and order as follows: 1. The following measures are to appear on the ballot for the Novem- ber 8, 1988, election: MEASURE H REFERENDUM ON SEGERSTROM HOME RANCH GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1. Shall City Council Resolution No. 88-11 be adopted which amends the City's General YES Plan by (a) setting a 3.100 million square foot maximum building intensity for the Segerstran Hane Ranch property; (b) setting maximum building heights NO at 5 to 20 stories for the property; (c) requiring certain corresponding street improvements be added to the Master Plan of Highways; (d) establishing a funding program to pay for these traffic improve- ments; and (e) making related changes including setting building intensity maximums for property in North Costa Mesa. MEASURE I REFERENDUM ON SEGERSTROM HOME RANCH GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2. Shall City Council Resolution No. 88-44 be adopted which is an alternative to YES Amendment No. 1 and differs frau it by (a) reducing the maximum building intensity for the entire ranch to 2.179 million square feet; (b) reducing the maxi- NO mum building height on the north half of the property frau 11 stories to 4 stories; and otherwise is essentially the same as Amendment No. 1. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph one above, if the Orange County Superior Court rules that one or both of these referenda is illegal or for any reason should not be placed on the ballot, then that referendum or referenda shall not be placed on the ballot. PASSED AND ADOPTED this lst day of August, 1988 ATTEST: -- ty Clerk of the City of Costa Me Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF COSTA MESA ) I, EILEEN P. PHINNEY, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and fore- going Resolution No. 88-58 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of August, 1988. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 2nd day of August, 1988. LAtj City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk o)VXfie City Council of the City of Cost sa