HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-42 - Denying Vesting Tentative Tract Map VT-15991RESOLUTION NO. 00 - Z/,2—
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP VT -15991.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, an application was filed by James Cefalia, owner of real property at
2087 Garden Lane, Costa Mesa, California 92626, requesting approval of a five (5) lot
residential subdivision, plus Lots "A" and "B" in the R2 -MD zone; and
WHEREAS, on May 8, 2000, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
public hearing at which Vesting Tentative Tract Map VT -15991 was approved; and
WHEREAS, an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve
Vesting Tentative Tract Map VT -15991 was submitted by City Council Member
Somers on May 12, 2000; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council
on June 5, 2000; ,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the evidence in the record
and the findings contained in Exhibit "A", the City Council hereby denies Vesting
Tentative Tract Map VT -15991 with respect to the property described above.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 51h day of June, 2000.
ATTEST:
Deputy City lerk of the City of Costa Mesa
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
C-� C -L. 1 -7)
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
APPROVED TO FORM
M
I, MARY T. ELLIOTT, Deputy City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council
of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and foregoing
Resolution No. ob - z/ was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said
City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th day of June, 2000.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of
the City of Costa Mesa this 6th day of June, 2000.
/,
Deputy City Jerk and ex -officio Clerk of
the City Co cil of the City of Costa Mesa
EXHIBIT "A"
DR -00-05 and VT -15991
FINDINGS
A. The project is not compatible and harmonious with other developments,
the uses in the area of the project will generate excess traffic and parking
needs, the site cannot accommodate the excess parking and the existing
demand for street parking and parking generated by the primary school in
relation to student pickup and drop-off, and the problem is,exacerbated by
the substandard length of the proposed driveways which cannot
accommodate an overflow of parking on-site.