HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 - CC-6 - Attachment 1 - 7/20/20212020
ANNUAL
REPORT
An Annual Report of the Costa Mesa 2015-2035 General Plan
City of Costa Mesa
Development Services Department
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92628
Attachment 1
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 3
Table of Contents
Background ……………………………………………………………… Page 4
Analysis ………………………………………………………………….. Page 4
Conclusion ………………………………………………………………. Page 5
______________________
Table 1 – Annual Review ……………………………………………… Page 6
Attachment 1 – Annual Progress Report Forms
Appendix A – General Plan Goals, Objectives, Policies
Appendix B – Housing Successor Annual Report
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 4
BACKGROUND
On June 29, 1953, the City of Costa Mesa was incorporated as a general law city led by a City Council-Manager
form of government. The City of Costa Mesa originally consisted of an area of 3.5 square miles and general
population of 16,840. The City’s current estimated population is 110,524 persons, and it consists of an overall land
area of 16.8 square miles.
The City adopted its first General Plan in 1957 and its second General Plan in 1970. The General Plan was
comprehensively amended in 1981 and again in 1992. On January 22, 2002, the City Council adopted the Costa
Mesa 2000 General Plan. The 2000 General Plan recognized the community’s diverse evolution of residential
neighborhoods, its regional commercial influence, and its recreational amenities.
The City completed its most recent comprehensive General Plan update (2015-2035 General Plan) that was
approved on June 21, 2016. Many of the policies were carried over from the 2000 General Plan and new policies
were added in compliance with the latest State mandates and in accordance with the economic growth of the City.
This is an annual report to Planning Commission and City Council as required by state law regarding the
implementation of the programs and policies of the General Plan. The purpose of this review is to provide the
status of the City’s General Plan and progress in its implementation. Table 1 provides a summary of the current
status of various General Plan Elements, including the latest Housing Element which was adopted in 2014.
ANALYSIS
Government Code Section 65400
State Government Code Section 65400 requires that an annual progress report (APR) be made to the City’s
legislative body on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation, including progress
toward meeting its Housing Element goals and its regional housing needs allocation. The Department of
Housing and Community Development updated their forms and instructions to incorporate new APR
requirements, pursuant to Assembly Bill 879 (2017), Senate Bill 35 (2017), Assembly Bill 1486 (2019),
Assembly Bill 101 (2019), Assembly Bill 1255 (2020) and Assembly Bill 83 (2020). This is the 5th annual review
of the 2015-2035 General Plan.
State Law requires the following:
Provide by April of each year an annual report to the City Council, the Office of Planning and Research,
and the Department of Housing and Community Development that includes all of the following:
(A) The status of the plan and progress in its implementation.
(B) The progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs determined pursuant to Section 65584
and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and
development of housing. The housing element portion of the annual report shall include a section
that describes the actions taken by the City of Costa Mesa towards completion of the programs and
status of the local government's compliance with the deadlines in its housing element.
Annual Review and Housing Program Summary Report
Pursuant to State law, the 2020 Annual Review of the Costa Mesa General Plan reports to the City Council the
progress in implementing the General Plan. The 2020 Annual Review includes the following elements:
1. Table 1 (Annual Review Summary) describes the status of the 2015-2035 General Plan goals, objectives, and
policies and progress in 2020 toward implementing the City’s long range plan for land use and development.
2. Attachment 1 (Housing Program Status Report) provides the City’s progress in meeting its share of the
regional housing needs assessment, pursuant to State Government Code Section 65584 and local efforts to
remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing.
3. The conclusion describes the effectiveness of the 2015-2035 General Plan.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 5
2015-2035 General Plan – Goals, Objectives, and Policies
The 2015-2035 General Plan goals, objectives, and policies are described in a comprehensive document
(attached as Appendix A).
A goal is defined as a broad vision of what the community wants to achieve or provide to residents,
landowners, business owners and tourists. It is a statement of a desired condition based on community
values. Goals are general in nature and usually timeless.
A policy is a specific statement that guides decision-making and indicates a particular course of action. A
policy is based on and helps implement a goal.
General Plan Update
The State Office of Planning and Research recommends that Cities update their General Plan every 10 years. City
Council approved the City’s 2015-2035 General Plan on June 21, 2016. The General Plan update is an extensive
process that involves various public meetings with City commissions and Council and extensive community
outreach.
As part of this update, the City was also complying with the requirements of Assembly Bill 1358 (enacted in
2008), The California Complete Streets Act that required integrating multimodal transportation network policies
into the circulation elements of the general plans. In addition, the Housing Element was updated in January
2014 and compliance was received from the State Department of Housing and Community Development for an
eight-year Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) cycle that began in 2014 and ends in 2021.
CONCLUSION
The Costa Mesa 2015-2035 General Plan serves as an effective guide for orderly growth and development,
preservation and conservation of open space land and natural resources, and efficient expenditure of public funds.
As illustrated in Attachment 1, completed projects are in conformance with the General Plan’s goals, objectives,
and policies for each respective element. Furthermore, significant progress on various public works projects or
private developments are also in accordance with the 2015-2035 General Plan. The City’s legislative bodies have
used the 2015-2035 General Plan as the primary source of long-range planning and policy direction. All future
development and activities will be consistent with these goals and policies that will continue to guide growth and
preserve the quality of life within the community.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 6
Table 1 – Annual Review
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal LU-1: A Balanced Community with a Mix of Land Uses to Meet Resident and Business Needs
Objective LU-1A: Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level
no greater than can be supported by the infrastructure.
LU-1.1 Provide for the development of a mix and balance of housing
opportunities, commercial goods and services, and employment
opportunities in consideration of the needs of the business and residential
segments of the community.
The zoning code is consistent with the General Plan allowing additional
housing and mixed-use opportunities. The Land Use designations and
correlated Zoning Map ensure a variety of commercial, residential, and
industrial uses throughout the City.In response to the COVID pandemic,
the City adopted urgency ordinances providing for a 24-month extension
for all approved discretionary planning applications. In addition, the City
also adopted (and extended) urgency ordinances related to outdoor
activities and parking requirements for dining patios and places of
religious assembly, as well as retail sales and service businesses.
LU-1.2 Balance economic gains from new development while preserving
the character and densities of residential neighborhoods.
All commercial development within the City which occurs near residential
development requires additional scrutiny and, in many cases, requires a
higher level of discretionary approval per the City’s Zoning Code to
ensure that the use does not negatively impact the residential
neighborhood.
LU-1.3 Strongly encourage the development of residential uses and
owner-occupied housing (single-family detached residences,
condominiums, townhouses) where feasible to improve the balance
between rental and ownership housing opportunities.
Homeownership is encouraged with development of residential projects,
including through the Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance as well as the
West Side overlay districts.
LU-1.4 Promote housing and employment opportunities within planned
development areas to the extent feasible.
The Urban Plan Overlays and the Planned Development zoning allow
mixed-use development. The City supported a 38-unit for sale residential
development on Newport Blvd. replacing a public storage and trailer
storage that is currently under construction.
LU-1.5 Maintain a land use structure that strives to balance jobs and
housing with available infrastructure and public and human services.
Ongoing. The City is a major center for employment in Orange County
and is striving to add more units to the housing stock to allow employees
to live and work in the City. In 2020, 140 residential units were completed.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 7
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Goal LU-2: Preserve and Protect Residential Neighborhoods
Objective LU-2A: Promote land use patterns and development that contribute to community and neighborhood identity.
LU-2.1 In the event of damage or destruction, allow any legal conforming
use in existence at the time of adoption of the General Plan that is located
in a nonconforming development to be rebuilt to its original building
intensity, as long as any such rebuilding would not increase the
development's nonconformity, and the damage or destruction was in no
way brought about by intentional acts of any owner of such use or
property.
Ongoing. Chapter X of the Zoning Code establishes requirements for
nonconforming uses, developments and lots.
LU-2.2 Pursue maximum use of utility company funds and resources in
undergrounding existing overhead lines, and encourage undergrounding
of utilities in the public right-of-way for residential development consisting
of five units or more, to the extent feasible and practical.
City policy requires all projects proposing 5 dwelling units or more on a
project site be conditioned to underground all utility poles within the
frontage.
LU-2.3 Develop standards, policies, and other methods to encourage the
grouping of individual parcels to eliminate obsolete subdivision patterns
and to provide improved living environments while being consistent with
the neighborhood character of the surrounding community.
Ongoing, the City Council adopted the Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance in
2014 to allow subdivisions of detached residential structures within the
density and zoning requirements of multi-family residential districts. In
response to residents’ concerns, in 2018 (Ordinance No. 18-10), the
Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance development standards were revised to
require more open space and larger setbacks, with the goal of providing
for improved neighborhood compatibility.
LU-2.4 Do not allow "rounding up" when calculating the number of
permitted residential units, except for lots existing as of March 16, 1992,
zoned R2-MD that have less than 7,260 square feet in area, and no less
than 6,000 square feet, where density calculation fractions of 1.65 or
greater may be rounded up to two units.
Consistently applied in review of development proposals. Densities in
excess of maximum density allowed for by the General Plan are subject to
approval of a General Plan Amendment unless the proposal includes a
density bonus and provides affordable housing.
LU-2.5 Allow creation of parcels without street frontage if sufficient
easements are provided for planned developments or common-interest
developments consistent with the neighborhood character. This policy
does not apply to small lot subdivisions.
All common roadways and access in common interest developments are
subject to recordation of an easement.
LU-2.6 Encourage increased private market investment in declining or
deteriorating neighborhoods.
Ongoing. The City Council adopted the Urban Plan Overlays in 2006
(revised in 2018) and Small Lot Ordinance in March 2014 (revised in
2018), to reinvest in older multiple family zoned properties. Several
projects under construction in Westside Costa Mesa have replaced
underutilized industrial and commercial properties with new housing and
live/work developments that also resulted in major environmental clean-up
of a few sites.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 8
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-2.7 Permit the construction of buildings over two stories or 30 feet
only when it can be shown that the construction of such structures will not
adversely impact surrounding developments and deprive existing land
uses of adequate light, air, privacy, and solar access.
Commercial buildings over 30 feet are subject to Planning Commission
approval and considered on a case-by-case basis. Structures in urban
overlay plans are typically over 30 feet and are evaluated with respect to
privacy and shade and shadow impacts. All projects with three stories or
more are required to submit a shade and shadow study during evaluation
of the project.
LU-2.8 Limit building height to four stories above grade south of the I-405
Freeway, except for special purpose housing such as elderly, affordable,
or student housing, unless otherwise approved by a General Plan
amendment. (A four-story/five-level parking structure with roof deck
parking on the fifth level is considered a four-story structure.)
There was no variance or General Plan Amendment approval in 2020 to
increase the maximum height of buildings over the allowable heights
established by the General Plan south of the I-405 Freeway.
LU-2.9 Require appropriate building setbacks, structure orientation, and
placement windows to consider the privacy of adjacent residential
structures within the same project and on adjacent properties.
Ongoing and applicable to all second-floor additions, remodels, and new
three-story developments.
LU-2.10 Promote lot consolidation of residential properties to the extent
feasible and practical, including the creation of larger single-family
residential lots that exceed the minimum 6,000-square-foot requirement in
neighborhoods where the prevailing residential subdivision pattern
features larger-sized residential lots.
Ongoing. Projects in Urban Plan areas are incentivized to pursue lot
consolidation. Lot consolidation is challenging for developers, especially
on the west side, but encouraged for all new developments.
LU-2.11 Ensure adequate noise attenuation in urban design, such as
walls for sound attenuation, development of landscaped greenbelts,
provision of landscape berms, etc.
Ongoing. Any new development is subject to compliance with the noise
standards and installation of sound walls and upgraded windows and wall
assemblies to protect residents.
Goal LU-3: Development that Maintains Neighborhood Integrity and Character
Objective LU-3A: Establish policies, standards, and procedures to minimize blighting influences, and maintain the integrity of stable neighborhoods.
LU-3.1 Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including
mobile home parks (and manufactured housing parks), from the
encroachment of incompatible or potentially disruptive land uses and/or
activities.
In 2020, there were no rezone approvals. In 2020, the City conducted a
study session with the City Council on Short Term Rentals, and
subsequently adopted a moratorium prohibiting the establishment and/or
operation of Short Term Rentals within all zoning districts of the City.
LU-3.2 Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or
abandoned vehicles, outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal buildings,
and establish regulations to abate weed-filled yards when any of the
above are deemed to constitute a health, safety, or fire hazard.
Ongoing through the implementation and enforcement of Title 20 –
Property Maintenance, of the Municipal Code. Title 20 establishes
standards to ensure proper maintenance, removal of hazardous and
improper storage, and removal of weeds and other public nuisances.
LU-3.3 Continue code enforcement as a high priority with regard to the
regulation of property maintenance standards citywide.
Ongoing prioritization of code enforcement efforts as it relates to property
maintenance.
LU-3.4 Ensure that residential densities can be supported by the
infrastructure and are compatible with existing residential neighborhoods
in the surrounding area.
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects. All new development proposed
beyond the allowable densities is subject to submittal of a water/sewer
assessment study (applicable to larger projects) and will serve letter from
the utility companies or other infrastructure planning analysis.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 9
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-3.5 Provide opportunities for the development of well-planned and
designed projects which, through vertical or horizontal integration, provide
for the development of compatible residential, commercial, industrial,
institutional, or public uses within a single project or neighborhood.
Ongoing. Development of mixed-use projects are encouraged by planned
development and overlay zones. The City is currently reviewing a mixed-
use project (One Metro West) with 1,057 residential units, 6,000 SF of
commercial retail and 25,000 SF of office space, proposed north of the
405 Freeway that allows for horizontal and vertical mixed use within a
single project.
LU-3.6 Facilitate revitalization of aging commercial centers by working
with property owners, developers, local businesses, and other community
organizations to coordinate efforts.
Staff works with property owners, brokers, and agents to help find the
right type of uses to be catalyst for revitalization. This includes
conducting interviews with existing businesses, organizing meetings to
facilitate an exchange of information and guidance, and taking potential
sites to an annual retail conference to assist in sites being redeveloped or
tenant vacancies filled.
LU-3.7 Promote development/design flexibility that encourages older or
poorly maintained high-density residential uses to be rehabilitated.
Ongoing promotion of development/design flexibility that encourages
rehabilitation of older or poorly maintained residential uses.
LU-3.8 Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards,
qualities, and features that are in context with nearby development and
surrounding residential neighborhoods.
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects.
LU-3.9 Locate high-intensity developments or high-traffic-generating uses
away from low-density residential in order to buffer the more sensitive land
uses from the potentially adverse impacts of the more intense
development or uses.
Traffic impacts are evaluated with each development project with
consideration to the City’s circulation element and any potential impacts to
residential neighborhoods.
LU-3.10 Minimize effects of new development on the privacy and
character of surrounding neighborhoods.
All two-story projects are required to submit privacy and view analysis
with exhibits that show location of proposed and existing buildings. In
addition, per the Residential Design Guidelines, second story additions
are subject to notification of neighboring properties prior to approval.
LU-3.11 Promote small-lot residential development on long, narrow,
single parcels or combined residential lots.
Most projects in Urban Plan areas are proposed with lot consolidation.
Lot consolidation is challenging for developers, but encouraged for all new
developments. Small lot residential developments are currently allowed
by Small Lot Ordinance and Common Interest Development.
LU-3.12 Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards,
qualities, and features that are in context with nearby development.
Ongoing and reviewed for all residential projects. All two- and three-story
residential development is required to meet the intent of the Residential
Design Guidelines.
LU-3.13 Prohibit construction of buildings which would present a hazard
to air navigation, as determined by the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA).
FAA is notified and reviews all mid-rise and high-rise development. The
General Plan is consistent with the John Wayne Airport Environmental
Land Use Plan by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC).
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 10
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-3.14 Certain development proposals which may include the
construction or alteration of structures more than 200 feet above ground
level may require filing with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and
Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) pursuant to federal and State law. If
a filing requirement is determined to be necessary in accordance with the
procedures provided by State/federal agencies, the filing of a Notice of
Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form 7460-1) shall be required
prior to review and consideration of the proposed development.” Land Use
Element (page LU-18) refers to the threshold stated above. It shall be
amended to refer to Filing FAA Form 7460-1 Notice of Construction and
Alteration, and not to Form 7480-1.
Filing with FAA and ALUC approval is required for all projects exceeding
the established FAA thresholds.
LU-3.15 The City will ensure that development proposals, including the
construction or operation of a heliport or helistop comply fully with permit
procedures under State law, including referral of the project to the ALUC
by the applicant, and with all conditions of approval imposed or
recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration, ALUC, and
Caltrans, including the filing of Form 7480-1 (Notice of Landing Area
Proposed) with the FAA. This requirement shall be in addition to all other
City development requirements.
Ongoing for all related development projects.
LU-3.16 The City shall refer certain projects to the Airport Land Use
Commission for Orange County, as required by Section 21676 of the
California Public Utilities Code to determine consistency of the project(s)
with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport.
Ongoing for applicable projects.
LU 3.17 New residential developments within the 60 dB CNEL noise
contour of the airport shall provide designated outdoor signage informing
the public of the presence of operating aircraft. Reviewed for residential projects within proximity to the airport.
Goal LU-4: New Development that Is Sensitive to Costa Mesa’s Environmental Resources
Objective LU-4A: Encourage new development and redevelopment that protects and improves the quality of Costa Mesa’s natural environment and
resources.
LU-4.1 Ensure that appropriate watershed protection activities are applied
to all new development and significant redevelopment projects that are
subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater
Permit during the planning, project review, and permitting processes.
All development plans are required to submit the appropriate State
required permits and water quality management plans per local
ordinance.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 11
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-4.2 Avoid conversion of areas particularly susceptible to erosion and
sediment loss (e.g., steep slopes) and/or establish development guidelines
that identifies these areas and protects them from erosion and sediment
loss.
Erosion control plans are consistently required and reviewed prior to
grading permits.
LU-4.3 Preserve or restore areas that provide water quality benefits
and/or are necessary to maintain riparian and aquatic biota.
Ongoing.
– Within Fairview Park, the City maintains 40 acres of wetland and
riparian habitat; monitors and maintains approximately 15 acres of vernal
pool and marshland/watershed area; and actively restored 6 acres of
canyon riparian habitat.
– Within Canyon Park, the City maintains three separate run-off channels
that contain important riparian and aquatic biota.
LU-4.4 Promote site development that limits impact on and protects the
natural integrity of topography, drainage systems, and water bodies, and
protect the integrity of the bluff crest.
Zoning Code also doesn’t allow a building or structure to be constructed
closer than ten (10) feet from a bluff crest, unless permitted by a minor
conditional use permit.
LU-4.5 Promote integration of stormwater quality protection into
construction and post-construction activities, as required by the NPDES
Stormwater Permit and the City’s Local Implementation Plan.
Required for all new CIP and development projects.
LU-4.6 Incorporate the principles of sustainability into land use planning,
infrastructure, and development processes to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions consistent with State goals.
Ongoing. The City Costa Mesa is committed to enhancing and expanding
its sustainability efforts to meet the State of California’s ambitious climate
and energy goals, while simultaneously achieving local objectives such as
reducing air pollution to improve public health, support the local economy
and build resilient infrastructure. The City has added an Energy Manager
position to its staff roster to pursue these opportunities and was recently
recognized as a LEED Gold City.
Goal LU-5: Adequate Community Services, Transportation System, and Infrastructure to Meet Growth
Objective LU-5A: Ensure availability of adequate community facilities and provision of the highest level of public services possible, taking into
consideration budgetary constraints and effects on the surrounding area.
LU-5.1 Pursue annexation of certain areas within the City's Sphere of
Influence to provide land use regulation and city services within its
jurisdiction.
No annexations were completed during 2020. The City of Costa Mesa
has approximately 0.3 square miles of land left within our sphere of
influence. The last annexation was on December 15, 2014, a County
island was annexed into the City’s jurisdiction and the development was
approved by Planning Commission on May 23, 2016.
LU-5.2 Strongly encourage protection and preservation of existing but
underutilized school sites for future recreational, social, or educational
uses.
Continued participation in the JUA between the City and NMUSD.
Continue to lease the Balearic Community Center from the NMUSD for
recreational and community service use.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 12
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-5.3 As appropriate and timely, consider the establishment of
development impact fee program(s) to fund additional fire and police
personnel, library facilities, and related equipment to meet the demands of
additional growth in the City.
The City’s Planning fees were last updated in 2019. In 2020, the City
Council adopted a Resolution establishing fees in connection with
applications for the modification of marijuana business permits (Measure
X).Also in 2020, the City Council adopted a Resolution establishing fees
in connection with Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance and
associated Wireless Telecommunications Use Permit.
LU-5.4 Require appropriate site and environmental analysis for future fire
and police station site locations or for the relocation or closure of existing
fire and police facilities.
Currently there are six fire stations operating in the City. The City
continues to monitor fire service needs as the population grows with new
residential development projects. In 2018, the City’s Fire Department
established a checklist and guideline in relation to Measure X applications
that has been utilized in review and inspection of these facilities.
The Police Department utilizes the headquarters facility as well as a
substation. Sufficient space to support some operations and
administrative requirements is less than optimal. The Department is
seeking to identify opportunity to address these needs.
LU.5.5 Ensure that new development pays its fair share of impact fees
such as park fees and traffic impact fees. This can also include impact
fees related to community services (police protection services and fire
emergency response services) or library facilities, once adopted and
applicable.
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects. The park impact fees were update
in 2015 to include apartment projects.In 2020, the City Council adopted a
Resolution establishing fees in connection with applications for the
modification of marijuana business permits (Measure X).Also in 2020, the
City Council adopted a Resolution establishing fees in connection with
Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance and associated Wireless
Telecommunications Use Permit.
LU-5.6 Promote development of revenue-generating land uses to help
defray the costs of high quality public services.
Ongoing. The Economic Development staff attends industry functions
and professional organizations to update businesses about projects and
opportunities in Costa Mesa.
LU-5.7 Encourage new development that is organized around compact,
walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods and districts to conserve open space
resources, minimize infrastructure costs, and reduce reliance on the
automobile.
Ongoing.The City is currently reviewing a mixed-use project (One Metro
West) with 1,057 residential units, 6,000 SF of commercial retail and
25,000 SF of office space, proposed north of the 405 Freeway that allows
for horizontal and vertical mixed use within a single project.
LU-5.8 Include an evaluation of impacts on utility systems and
infrastructure in EIRs for all major general plan amendment, rezone, and
development applications.
Will serve letters from utility companies are required for all projects that
could potentially impact the service. Projects with more than 500 units are
subject to the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment Study.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 13
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-5.9 Phase or restrict future development in the City to that which can
be accommodated by infrastructure at the time of completion of each
phase of a multi-phased project.
Will serve letters from utility companies are required for all projects that
could potentially impact the service. Projects with more than 500 units are
subject to the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment Study.
LU-5.10 Building densities/intensities for proposed new development
projects shall not exceed the trip budget for applicable land use
classifications, as identified in the Land Use Element. Building intensities
for proposed new development projects shall not exceed the applicable
floor area standards, except for the following conditions:
(a) Limited deviations from the graduated floor-area ratio standards for
the commercial and industrial land use designations may be approved
through a discretionary review process. No deviation shall exceed a
0.05 increase in the FAR in the moderate traffic category, and no
deviation shall be allowed in the very low, low, and high traffic
categories. Deviations from the FAR standards shall not cause the
daily trip generation for the property to be exceeded when compared
to the existing daily trip generation for the site without the proposed
project or maximum allowable traffic generation for the Moderate
Traffic FAR category, whichever is greater.
(b) Additions to existing nonconforming nonresidential developments may
be allowed if the additions do not affect the overall traffic generation
characteristics of the development and if the additions do not
substantially affect the existing height and bulk of the development.
Additions to nonresidential developments shall be limited to those land
uses with traffic generation rates based on variables other than
building area square footage. Examples of such additions include, but
are not limited to: 1) Hotels/motels: Increases in the size of hotel
rooms or lobbies where no increase in the total number of rooms is
proposed, and 2) theaters: Increases to “back-stage” support areas or
lobbies where no increase in the total number of seats is proposed.
(c) In the above conditions, the new development shall be compatible
with surrounding land uses.
(d) Additional criteria for approving deviations from the FAR standards
may be established by policy of the City Council.
a) No project specific General Plan Amendment exceeding the allowable
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) was approved in 2020.
b) Any intensification of use or additions of floor area for non-conforming
structures is subject to the zoning development standards and traffic
generation rates. No applications to increase the FAR of a non-
conforming structure has been approved in 2020.
c) There has been no change to the policy.
d) There has been no change to the policy
LU-5.11 Development plans shall be required for all phased development
and approvals and shall be approved by the Planning and Transportation
Services Divisions prior to the issuance of building permits.
Ongoing and required for projects proposed in phases.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 14
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-5.12 Development plans shall include an overall buildout plan, which
can demonstrate the ability of the circulation system to support the
proposed level of development.
Each project application is reviewed for any potential impacts on the
circulation system. Projects with impacts are subject to either traffic
improvement requirements and or traffic mitigation/impact fees.
LU-5.13 The City shall continue its annual preparation of the
Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program. The annual
review will specifically address major intersection operations in any mixed-
use overlay area.
The Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program
(DPPMP) Report is no longer a requirement for the Measure M Program.
Staff continues to monitor major intersections for any significant issues
and program improvements accordingly and reviews each project in terms
of traffic impacts, in compliance with Growth Management Element Policy
GM-2.3.
Goal LU-6: Economically Viable and Productive Land Uses that Increase the City’s Tax Base
Objective LU-6A: Ensure the long-term productivity and viability of the community's economic base.
LU-6.1 Encourage a mixed of land uses that maintain and improve the
City’s long-term fiscal health.
Ongoing.In response to the COVID pandemic and to attempt to maintain
the City’s fiscal health, the City adopted urgency ordinances providing for
a 24-month extension for all approved discretionary planning applications.
In addition, the City also adopted (and extended) urgency ordinances
related to outdoor activities and parking requirements for dining patios
and places of religious assembly, as well as retail sales and service
businesses.
LU-6.2 Continue to promote and support the vitality of commercial uses to
meet the needs of local residents and that support regional-serving
commercial centers.
Ongoing, the City continues to promote and support commercial uses that
meet the needs of local residents and supports commercial centers.
LU-6.3 Continue to prioritize commercial and industrial park use of
properties north of I-405 and within the Airport Industrial District.
Continue to facilitate resident-supported Measure X, which will provide
strong economic incentive to maintain industrial uses within the Harbor
Gateway.
LU-6.4 Support the continued presence of incubator businesses in the
action sports industry and jobs-producing businesses in the Westside.
Ongoing, the City continues to support the action sports industry and
businesses in the Westside.
LU-6.5 Encourage revitalization of existing, older commercial and
industrial areas in the Westside with new mixed-use development
consisting of ownership housing stock and live/work units.
In 2020, 7 residential units have been completed in Westside Costa Mesa
as a result of the Urban plans.
LU-6.6 Continue to encourage and retain land uses that generate
sustainable sales and property tax revenues, including regional
commercial destinations and automobile dealerships.
Ongoing, the City continues to encourage new and retain existing land
uses, which generate sustainable sales and tax revenues. For example, a
new Audi Auto Dealership opened in Costa Mesa earlier this year.
LU-6.7 Encourage new and retain existing businesses that provide local
shopping and services.
Ongoing efforts to encourage and retain local businesses for shopping
and services.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 15
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-6.8 Provide efficient and timely review of development proposals while
maintaining quality customer service standards for the business,
development, and residential community.
All development proposals are assigned to a planner who works as a
liaison for that project from application submittal until final inspection of
the development.
LU-6.9 Support the retention and growth of Class A office tenants,
including corporate headquarters for the action sports industry, biotech,
and high technology companies within the City.
Supported the expedited review of multiple reinvestments of several
commercial and office uses throughout the City.
Objective LU-6B: Encourage and facilitate activities that expand the City’s revenue base.
LU-6.10 Encourage a broad range of business uses that provide
employment at all income levels and that make a positive contribution to
the City’s tax base.
Ongoing encouragement of various types of businesses that provide
employment at all income levels and has a positive contribution to the
City's tax base. For example, the Van's Headquarters office expansion
was approved and is under construction this year. In addition, Anduril
Industries located at the former LA Times/Press site in early 2021.
LU-6.11 Provide opportunities for mixed-use, office, manufacturing, and
retail development that respond to market and community needs in terms
of size, location, and cost.
Ongoing. The Press project, amended in 2020, includes repurposing of a
vacant manufacturing and distribution facility of the former LA Times site
for development of mixed used development including office uses and a
retail market hall consisting of approximately 40 commercial spaces, as
well as a multi-purpose event space. More recently, ownership signed a
15-year lease with Anduril Industries in early 2021 for the entire existing
project plus an additional industrial/office building and parking structure.
The addition of a new ground up building and 5-story parking structure will
bring the total project size to 620,594 SF, which is close to the originally
approved Preliminary Master Plan SF for the site of 651,000 SF. The
project is currently under review for a master plan amendment.
LU-6.12 Track retail trends and tailor regulations to respond to market
changes, maximize revenue, and maintain the appropriate the business
mix.
Staff has been attending quarterly meetings, which provide trends and
forecasts for the industrial, retail, and office markets. This information is
used to provide insight as staff continues to evaluate new business or
potential redevelopment projects within the City.
LU-6.13 Encourage new development along major corridors that are
pedestrian oriented and includes a mixture of retail/service, residential,
and office uses.
Ongoing. The Residential Incentive Overlay (adopted in 2016 and revised
in 2018), allows for opportunities of residential development at strategic
locations along Harbor Boulevard and Newport Boulevard.
LU-6.14 Improve ease and accessibility to information to capture
opportunities for businesses to establish in Costa Mesa and bring high-
skill and professional jobs and new revenue sources into the community.
The City launched the Costa Mesa Business Assistance Collaborative
which promotes the easy flow of information and resources during COVID
and beyond. The City acquired software that provides socioeconomic,
psychographic, and mobilytics data to make informed decisions and set
focused goals for economic prosperity. The City is also in the process of
implementing a Land Management System which will provide more
efficient application, permit, and licensing processes, transparency, and a
paperless system that improves customer service.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 16
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-6.15 Promote unique and specialized commercial and industrial
districts within the City which allow for incubation of new or growing
businesses and industries.
The City identified and evaluated economic enclaves against several
economic indices. There are 7 economic enclaves within the City. These
enclaves will be used for tracking economic indicators and development
and measuring the impact of economic programs and initiatives. The City
has also continued to approve projects that support the various
commercial and industrial districts within the City, which include helping
complete the development at Van's Headquarters expansion, The
Press/Anduril site, Audi Auto Dealership, and more.
LU-6.16 Examine options for the development of new infrastructure for
new technologies and businesses that use those technologies.
The City is implementing a Land Management System, which will provide
more efficient application, permit, and licensing processes, transparency,
and a paperless system that improves customer service. The City is also
pursuing tech businesses that can add to this growth industry within the
City. The City streamline its wireless facilities review process and is
continuing to explore growth in fiber optics connectivity.
Objective LU-6C: Retain and expand the City’s diverse employment base, including office, retail/service, restaurants, high-tech, action sports,
boutique and prototype manufacturing, and industrial businesses.
LU-6.17 Engage in activities that promote Costa Mesa as a great place to
live, work, and develop a business.
Ongoing. Working closely with the Chamber of Commerce, Travel Costa
Mesa, South Coast Metro Alliance, and / or local businesses to support
each other’s activities and develop additional ones when needed.
LU-6.18 Continue to work with surrounding cities to strengthen regional
economic development
Staff attends local and regional economic development summits,
workshops, and meetings.
LU-6.19 Provide flexibility and support for development of residential,
office, small retail centers, and similar uses that would serve local
residents and would also benefit from the high visibility along major
corridors outside of significant commercial or industrial nodes.
Ongoing. The City is currently reviewing a mixed-use project (One Metro
West) with 1,057 residential units, 6,000 SF of commercial retail and
25,000 SF of office space, proposed north of the 405 Freeway that allows
for horizontal and vertical mixed use within a single project. The Press
project, amended in 2020, includes repurposing of a manufacturing and
distribution facility of the former LA Times site for development of mixed
used development including office uses and a retail market hall consisting
of approximately 40 commercial spaces.
Goal LU-7: A Sound Local Sustainable Economy that Attracts Investment, Creates Educational Opportunities, and Generates Employment
Opportunities
LU-7.1 Endeavor to create mixture of employment opportunities for all
economic levels of residents and businesses.
Reorganized the Economic Development website page for more
efficiency. Continued assisted new development opportunities and
support for existing businesses.
LU-7.2 Support linkages between local educational institutions and local
industries and businesses. Foster training, collaboration with employers,
and new innovative programs that increase job opportunities for residents
and students attending school locally.
Ongoing support for local industries and business that create linkages to
help increase job opportunities for residents and students.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 17
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-7.3 Foster and provide useful and efficient partnerships to implement
economic opportunities with private, non-profit, or other public agencies.
The City continues to collaborate in regular meetings with private, non-
profit, and other public agencies.
LU-7.4 Cultivate an entrepreneurial and academic environment that
fosters innovation through non-traditional housing developments, flexible
office spaces, experiential development, and ensuring the diversity of
retail/service throughout the urban districts.
In 2020, 7 housing units have been constructed in the Westside as a
result of the Urban plans.
LU-7.5 Support and provide flexibility for development projects and
businesses which produce, care, and maintain material goods or fixed
assets meant to support the production of market goods, especially for
niche industries within the City of Costa Mesa.
Ongoing support for projects and businesses which support the
production of market goods, especially for niche industries in the City.
LU-7.6 Seek out opportunities to attract primary businesses within stable
industries and support industries that already exist within the City.
Collaborating with multiple property owners and businesses to attract new
hotels to the City. Conducting yearly updates to the Advantage brochure
and Community Economic Profile handout.
LU-7.7 Explore economic and employment opportunities to retain and
strengthen the unique industry niches along Bristol and Paularino, in the
Westside, on East 17th Street, and throughout North Costa Mesa.
Conducted interviews with major industries within these areas and will
continue ongoing dialogues with local businesses to support them.
LU-7.8 Support the development of pedestrian plazas and gathering
places, and institutional spaces, as well as the more efficient use of
existing spaces, to support economic growth and branding of existing
industries within the City.
Ongoing support for the development of pedestrian plazas and gathering
places, and institutional spaces to support economic growth and branding
of existing industries within the City.
Goal LU-8: Promote a range of multiple uses at the Fairview Developmental Center site
LU-8.1 In anticipation of the potential closure or repurposing of the
Fairview Development Center site, the City will work with appropriate State
agencies or private entity (if the property is sold) to plan for a
complementary mix of low-scale residential, institutional, public facilities,
open spaces, and recreational uses within a campus setting.
The City continues to engage with local and state representatives to
discuss redevelopment or reuse of this site, potentially related to
homelessness issues. A City Council ad-hoc committee reported in
January 2020 that veteran housing, permanent supportive housing and
rental and ownership housing for all income levels should be included in
the vision for Fairview Developmental Center. The Fairview
Developmental Center was expected to close around 2020, but due to the
COVID pandemic, the future of the site remains unclear.
Goal LU-9: Ensure that Fairgrounds uses are consistent with the General Plan designation
LU-9.1 Discourage changes in the allowable uses specified in the
Fairgrounds General Plan land use designation for the Orange County
Fair & Event Center property. Ensure that amendments to this General
Plan designation are approved by the electorate.
Ongoing. The City representative participates in the monthly OC Fair
Board meetings.
Goal LU-10: Promote the growth of tourism
Objective LU-10A: Promote structural improvements of visitor-oriented land uses.
LU-10.1 Engage with property owners, developers, and business owners
to encourage the revitalization of the hotel/motels.
Ongoing meetings and collaboration with property owners and developers
to encourage the revitalization of motels and inns within the City.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 18
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-10.2 Provide incentives to motel development projects seeking to
improve existing motel facilities by increasing the hotel rating. These
projects may include:
Updating building mechanical, electrical, or plumbing to comply with
current building standards
Updating physical improvements to the site
Adding hotel amenities to the site
Updating or improving the landscaping on the site
Updating or improving the façade of the building(s)
Ongoing and provided when motel development or improvement projects
are proposed. For example, modifications to the Avenue of the Arts hotel
were approved by the City and, though delayed due to the COVID
pandemic, are slated for construction in the coming year.
Objective LU-10B: Promote growth of visitor-oriented land uses.
LU-10.3 Motel and hotel land uses should be encouraged to be located
near major transportation corridors and close to key tourist/visitor draws,
other recreation venues, the airport, regional, and general local shopping
centers.
Ongoing and encouraged for any motel or hotel projects.
LU-10.4 Consider the interest of quality of stay for visitors when
evaluating projects near visitor-oriented land uses by requiring on-site
amenities and upscale guest services.
Ongoing and reviewed for all applicable projects.
Objective LU-10C: Promote uses and events that make visitor-oriented business more economically viable.
LU-10.5 Celebrate and promote the arts, culture, and industries of Costa
Mesa through special events, civic gatherings, and City marketing and
tourism promotion efforts.
The 7th annual signature ARTventure event was scheduled in partnership
with the Segerstrom Center for the Performing Arts, but was cancelled
due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Staff anticipate offering this event in the
future when events such as these are permitted by state guidance.
LU-10.6 Promote the development of small-scale manufacturing uses or
other uses that generate multiple secondary and tertiary markets that
support business travel tourism-related uses.
Ongoing and encouraged for uses that generate secondary and tertiary
markets which support tourism-related uses.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 19
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
LU-10.7 Maintain and enhance the City’s status and image as a centrally
located destination and cultural center in Orange County.
In 2019, the Parks, Arts, and Community Services (PACS) Commission
approved the Arts and Culture Master Plan. Anticipated approval for Arts
and Culture Master Plan in 2021 by City Council.
The City has also completed various phases of the following beautification
projects that will keep Costa Mesa an interesting destination:
- The City completed construction of blue Costa Mesa engraved custom
bicycle racks at various locations throughout the City.
- The City completed the design phase for the Randolph Avenue
Improvements Project for the redesign of Randolph Avenue and a
roundabout at the intersection of Randolph Avenue and St. Clair St.
- The City completed the design phase for raised medians on Fairview
Road and is moving forward with construction.
- The City completed the design phase of the Merrimac Way Bicycle
Facility Improvements project and is moving forward with construction.
- The City completed construction of Bear Street project from I-405
Freeway to Baker St.
- The City is constructing the Merrimac Way project from Harbor Blvd. to
Fairview Rd.
- The City will undertake rehabilitation construction of Newport Blvd. from
Bristol St. to 19th St. (both southbound and northbound directions).
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Goal C‐1: Implement “Complete Streets” Policies on Roadways in Costa Mesa
Objective C‐1A: Create a transportation network that meets the mobility needs of all Costa Mesa residents, businesses, and visitors.
C‐1.1: Update the City’s engineering standards for public and private
streets to provide for safe, comfortable, and attractive access and travel
for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit users of all ages, abilities,
and modes of travel.
Ongoing. When streets are resurfaced or reconstructed, the striping is
modified to improve travel for all modes and meet the latest standards in
the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD).
The Bear Street Project implemented Class II bike lanes, high visibility
pedestrian crosswalk markings, and a green bicycle box at the
intersection of Bear/Baker. The Hamilton Street Project implemented
improved Class II bike lanes and buffered Class II bicycle lanes where
feasible, high visibility pedestrian crosswalk markings, and green bicycle
conflict markings. These improvements enhance the access and mobility
of bicycling and walking.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 20
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
C‐1.2: Allow for flexible use of public rights‐of‐way to accommodate all
users of the street system while maintaining safety standards.
Ongoing. The Bear Street Improvement Project and the Hamilton
Improvements Project narrowed vehicle travel lanes to implement new
Class II bicycle lanes and widen existing Class II bicycle lanes while
maintaining design standards. Where there was additional public right-of-
way, buffered Class II bicycle lanes were implemented. In addition, high
visibility pedestrian crosswalk markings and green bicycle conflict zone
markings were installed.
C‐1.3: Complete and annually maintain a needs assessment for traffic
service levels and traffic safety. Develop and annually update a priority list
of improvement projects, with priorities based on: 1) correcting identified
hazards; 2) accommodating multimodal trips; 3) improving and/or
maintaining peak‐hour traffic volumes at critical intersections; 4) improving
efficiency of existing infrastructure utilization; and 5) intergovernmental
coordination.
A review of traffic levels of service at key intersections and review of
traffic accidents at intersections and segments is conducted annually.The
City has several Traffic Signal Synchronization Projects for major
corridors which update signal timing and improve traffic levels of service
from signal coordination. The signal timing is adjusted as needed to
maintain optimal signal synchronization on major corridors. The Local
Road Safety Plan Project will identify and create a priority list of locations
and projects to improve safety for all modes to be developed and
completed in 2021.
C‐1.4: Pursue downgrade of arterials that no longer have the demand
requiring their buildout to planned capacity.
Ongoing. Sent request to OCTA requesting an MPAH Amendment to
downgrade West 19th Street. Conducted meetings with OCTA regarding
West 19th Street downgrade request.
C‐1.5: Implement road diets on street segments with excess capacity to
enhance bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Merrimac Way was identified and final design completed for a road diet
project with the excess capacity for cycle tracks to enhance bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. The project is currently under construction.
C‐1.6: Encourage the conversion of excess on‐street parking spaces for
expanded sidewalk gathering places or landscaping.
Identifying opportunities for parklets and drafted encroachment permit
application and agreement for parklets in on-street parking spaces.
C‐1.7: Encourage community participation in City processes and
programs focused on improving mobility and transportation facilities.
Community meetings were held on several projects including Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvement Projects, Safety Projects, and Widening
Projects.
C‐1.8: Pursue downgrade of 17th Street from 6-lane Major Arterial to 4-
lane Primary Arterial between Orange Ave and Tustin Avenue, through
Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) Amendment process with the
Orange County Transportation Authority.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
Objective C‐1B: Preserve the character of our residential neighborhoods.
C‐1.9: Implement traffic calming measures that discourage speeding and
cut-through traffic on residential streets.
Ongoing. Speed reduction striping installed on residential streets as
needed. Speed limit pavement markings and signs were installed along
residential streets as needed.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 21
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
C‐1.10: Encourage non-motorized transportation in residential areas by
providing sidewalks and implementing bicycle friendly design of local
streets.
Ongoing. The City is working on many pedestrian and bicycle friendly
design projects. Completed construction of missing sections of sidewalk
along Congress St. from National Ave. to Placentia Ave. and along
Anaheim Ave. from Bay St. to W. 19th St. New construction planned for
Mesa Dr. from Newport Blvd. to Santa Ana Ave. and along Orange Ave.
near Lillian Pl.
C‐1.11: Reduce or eliminate intrusion of traffic related to non-residential
development on local streets in residential neighborhoods.
Traffic calming measures and warning signs are installed, as necessary,
on local streets to reduce cut through traffic.
C‐1.12: Prioritize intersection improvements which improve through traffic
flow on Major, Primary, and Secondary Arterials, and reduce impacts on
local neighborhood streets with emphasis on pedestrian safety.
Adams Avenue at Pinecreek intersection improvement project is
underway with an emphasis on pedestrian and bicycle safety.
C‐1.13: Promote engineering improvements such as physical measures
constructed to lower speeds, improve safety, and otherwise reduce the
impacts of motor vehicles.
Median projects are being implemented on several arterials to address
speeding and reduce severe accidents.
C‐1.14: Design and Implement transportation projects to meet local and
regional system capacity needs in accordance with the Master Plan of
Streets and Highways.
Transportation projects are designed and implemented to meet local and
regional capacity needs in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets
and Highways.
C‐1.15: Implement neighborhood approved traffic-calming measures in
residential neighborhoods and appropriate commercial areas, such as
street narrowing, curb extensions, roundabouts, landscaped medians, and
radar speed feedback signs.
Ongoing. The Reimagine 19th Street was a demonstration project
partnered with the Costa Mesa Alliance for Better Streets to install two
temporary traffic circles at the intersections of 19th/Monrovia and
Center/Wallace and a temporary bulb-outs at 19th/Wallace. The design of
the Randolph Avenue Improvements Project was completed which
includes the following traffic calming measures: road diet along Randolph
Avenue, lane narrowing, angled parking in the center of Randolph Avenue
and St. Clair St, roundabout at the intersection of Randolph/St. Clair,
speed cushions, and a midblock raised crosswalk with Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacons.
C‐1.16: Establish priority‐ranking system to evaluate traffic-calming
requests for implementation throughout the City.
Traffic calming requests are evaluated by collecting traffic data including
speed and volume data, collision history, field investigation and traffic
engineering analysis. Traffic calming measures are assessed including
the City's speed hump guidelines.
C‐1.17: Pursue programs that reduce vehicle speeds and cut‐through
traffic on local streets.
Ongoing. Traffic studies were conducted and traffic calming design plans
developed for Meyer Place and Pomona Avenue to reduce vehicles
speeds and enhance striping.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 22
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Goal C‐2: Effectively Manage and Improve the Roadway System
Objective C‐2A: Implement policies that encourage and accommodate all users while maintaining the efficiency of the circulation system.
C‐2.1: Establish a citywide crosswalk policy to address installation,
maintenance, removal, and enhancements of crosswalks at intersections
and mid‐block locations. Crosswalk locations and treatment will be based
on criteria including, but not limited to safety, traffic volume, and
concentration of pedestrian activity. Potential enhancements may include
leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections, bulb‐outs, and
median refuges to reduce crossing distances.
To be established. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review. High visibility crosswalks including ladder or continental
style crosswalks are being implemented at arterials or locations with high
pedestrian activity. The Bear St Improvement Project and the Hamilton
Avenue Improvement Project both implemented ladder and continental
style crosswalks. Leading Pedestrian Intervals were implemented at
signalized locations with high pedestrian volumes near South Coast
Plaza.
C‐2.2: Avoid creation of frequent driveways for new development access
in active pedestrian areas that create conflict points between pedestrians
and vehicles.
Ongoing and reviewed for applicable development projects.
C‐2.3: Encourage commercial property owners to use shared driveway
access and interconnected roads within blocks, where feasible. Require
driveway access closures or consolidations, or both when a site is
remodeled or redeveloped.
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects; shared access and driveways are
encouraged when feasible.
C‐2.4: Collaborate with law enforcement and public safety organizations
to coordinate policies and programs that would reduce injuries and deaths
on the roadways.
The City received a grant to develop a Local Road Safety Plan which is
underway. This project will develop a Local Road Safety Plan for all
modes including walking and bicycling which will help ongoing efforts to
make safety improvements by analyzing crash data, identifying emphasis
areas, and countermeasures through public outreach and diverse
stakeholder collaboration including law enforcement and public safety
organizations.
C‐2.5: Designate routes for truck traffic to minimize potential conflicts
between trucks and cars, pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and vehicle access
and circulation. Establish by ordinance a truck map that depicts allowable
truck routes within the City.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
C‐2.6: Periodically review and update traffic signal timing at all signalized
intersections to maintain traffic signal coordination and to accommodate
bicycle and pedestrian needs.
Ongoing. The Bear Street and Red Hill Traffic Signal Synchronization
Projects are underway and will update traffic signal timing to maintain
signal coordination and improve timing for bicycles and pedestrians
including updating minimum green times for bicyclists and pedestrian
clearance intervals. Leading Pedestrian Intervals will be implemented at
identified locations.
C‐2.7: Develop new traffic level of services criteria in accordance with SB
743 to meet the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Ongoing. Additional information will be provided in the 2021 annual review
when SB743 VMT thresholds have been adopted.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 23
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
C‐2.8: Continue the use of the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU)
methodology to address local traffic level of service and impacts, with
Level of Service “D” as the threshold for meeting the City’s significance
criteria.
The use of the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to
address local traffic level of service and impacts, with Level of Service “D”
as the threshold for meeting the City’s significance criteria is used in
evaluating development projects and City CIP projects.
Objective C‐2B: Construct street improvements and apply congestion management tools to obtain efficient performance of the transportation
system.
C‐2.9: Incorporate the street system improvements identified in the
General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) into the Capital
Improvement Program.
The City's proposed Capital Improvement Program and the City's five
year CIP program is updated annually to incorporate improvements
identified in the General Plan. In addition, the City's annual review of the
traffic impact fee includes projects identified in the City's General Plan.
C‐2.10: Continue to deploy intelligent transportation systems (ITS)
strategies—such as adaptive signal controls, fiber optic communication
equipment, closed circuit television cameras, real‐time transit information,
and real‐ time parking availability information—to reduce traffic delays,
lower greenhouse gas emissions, improve travel times, and enhance
safety for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists.
Ongoing. Traffic signal improvement projects are currently being
implemented along Bear Street and Fairview Road corridors.
C‐2.11: Investigate all operational measures, including the use of one‐way
streets, to improve traffic circulation and to minimize congestion for all
travel modes.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
C‐2.12: Investigate and utilize state‐of‐the‐art transportation system
management technology and industry practices to address recurring and
non‐recurring traffic events (i.e., special events, incident/emergency
management).
Ongoing. A maintenance program for Citywide GPS EVP system has
been established.
C‐2.13: Continue to evaluate and pursue design and operational
improvements (medians, driveway closures, signal synchronization or
phasing, parking or turn restrictions, etc.) to improve the efficiency of
intersections.
The City pursues grant opportunities for design and operational
improvements annually.
Goal C‐3: Enhance Regional Mobility and Coordination
Objective C‐3A: Promote development of transportation projects along regional corridors.
C‐3.1: Maintain compliance with Orange County Congestion
Management Plan (CMP) requirements, including consistency with CMP
level of service standards, adoption of a seven‐year capital improvement
program, analysis of impacts of land use decisions on the CMP highway
system, and adoption and implementation of deficiency plans when
intersections do not meet adopted performance standards.
City conducts a review of CMP in coordination with OCTA every two
years.
C‐3.2: Support the goals and objectives of the Orange County Long
Range Transportation Plan, including expansion of transportation system
choices, improvement of transportation system performance, and
sustainability of transportation infrastructure.
The City's General Plan including the Active Transportation Plan are
consistent with the goals and objectives of the Orange County Long
Range Transportation Plan.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 24
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
C‐3.3: Support the goals and objectives of the SCAG Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS),
including expansion of transportation system choices, improvement of
transportation system performance, and sustainability of transportation
infrastructure.
The City pursued grant opportunities through SCAG's sustainable
communities grant program for expansion and improvements to the City's
bicycle and pedestrian network.
C‐3.4: Coordinate signal timing on all major arterials with a local signal
synchronization program consistent with the Orange County Traffic Signal
Synchronization Master Plan (TSSMP).
Several traffic signal improvement projects are underway using this
program funding.
C‐3.5: Ensure Costa Mesa’s input, participation, and discretionary review
of applicable region‐wide transportation system policies, programs, and
construction.
The City participates and provides input in OCTA's Technical Advisory
Committee, OCTA's Technical Steering Committee, and OCTA's Traffic
Forums.
C‐3.6: Develop short-term and long-term improvements to the SR-55
corridor in coordination with Caltrans and OCTA to address regional
mobility needs.
Ongoing. A design project is underway to review short-term improvement
options for Newport Boulevard in the Downtown area.
C‐3.7: Promote the City’s preferred alternative of undergrounding the
SR-55 freeway south of 19th Street within the City limits.
City staff continue to promote to OCTA the undergrounding of the SR -55
freeway south of 19th Street within the City limits.
Objective C‐3B: Coordinate and partner with local and regional agencies to promote projects and polices that improve regional mobility.
C‐3.8: Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to maintain or improve
mobility within the City to achieve a standard Level of Service no worse
than “D” at all intersections under State or joint control. Intersection Level
of Service analyses for General Plan conditions for locations under State
or joint control will be updated periodically and presented to the City
Council.
Ongoing coordination with Cities of Santa Ana, Newport Beach and
Huntington Beach on traffic signal issues and development projects and
with Caltrans on their improvement projects.
C‐3.9: Consult with Caltrans and OCTA regarding the I‐405 widening
project to minimize adverse impacts to Costa Mesa’s neighborhoods,
businesses, and streets.
Biweekly meetings held with OCTA, Caltrans, and OC405 contractor.
Monthly meetings hold with OCTA, Caltrans, and adjacent 405 corridor
cities. City review of design documents, traffic control plans, and outreach
materials.
C‐3.10: Coordinate with OCTA and other jurisdictions to remove Gisler
Avenue Bridge over the Santa Ana River from the City’s Master Plan of
Streets and Highways and County’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways.
The current agreement and designation was extended until 2025.
Ongoing coordination.
C‐3.11: Collaborate with Caltrans and neighboring jurisdiction to improve
signal timing and coordination along major arterials across jurisdictional
boundaries.
Current traffic signal synchronization projects underway for Red Hill
Avenue with the City of Irvine, Fairview Road with Caltrans and City of
Santa Ana, and Bear Street with Caltrans and City of Santa Ana.
C‐3.12: Work closely with the State of California and other government
agencies to control traffic–related impacts of uses on State- or other
agency-owned land (i.e., Orange County Fairgrounds, Orange Coast
College, etc.).
Ongoing. The City meets quarterly with the Newport-Mesa Unified School
District as part of the City/District Liaison Meeting and the City also sends
a representative to the monthly OC Fair Board meetings.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 25
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
C‐3.13: Coordinate with other responsible agencies the planning, funding,
prioritization, and implementation of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit
programs and supporting infrastructure.
City pursues several grant opportunities for active transportation projects
through OCTA, SCAG, Caltrans, and Federal grant opportunities.
Goal C‐4: Promote Transportation Demand Management, Transit, and Efficiency
Objective C‐4A: Encourage greater utilization of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to reduce dependence on
single‐occupancy vehicles.
C‐4.1: Support South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
trip reduction programs, including park and ride lots, transit subsidies,
carpool and vanpool programs, flexible working hours, bicycle facilities,
and other traffic reduction strategies.
During COVID-19 pandemic, telework opportunities for staff with telework
capabilities were implemented. Currently, a 9-80 work schedule has been
implemented at City Hall.
C‐4.2: Support local and multi‐jurisdictional car‐sharing and bike‐sharing
programs.
Potential bike sharing programs locally have been reviewed by the City's
Bikeway and Walkability Committee. Multi-jurisdictional opportunities do
not exist at this time.
C‐4.3: Consider implementing park‐once approaches for multiuse
districts and regional destinations areas.
Ongoing consideration as commercial development projects are
proposed; implemented through flexibility in city parking standards for
shopping centers and due to unique operating characteristics.
C‐4.4: Embrace innovative parking solutions that reduce the required
spaced needed for parking, such as automated parking lifts and elevators. This will be considered at project level review.
C‐4.5: Encourage and provide incentives for commercial, office, and
industrial development to provide preferred parking for carpools, vanpools,
electric vehicles, and flex cars.
Large projects are required to provide Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) programs incorporating various trip reduction
strategies.
C‐4.6: Encourage and support programs that increase vehicle
occupancy, including the provision of traveler information, shuttles,
preferential parking for carpools/vanpools, transit pass subsidies, and
other methods.
Ongoing. The City received Project V Transit Circulator grant funds from
OCTA for circulator bus in SoBECA area and South Coast Plaza which
ended in 2018 due to low ridership. The City is looking for future
opportunities and supportive of programs that increase vehicle
occupancy.
C‐4.7: Promote the combination of TDM measures as much more
effective than any single measure. TDM measures are promoted with development projects.
C‐4.8: Require discussion of transportation system management (TSM)
and TDM measures in all EIRs prepared for major projects. Ongoing and required for projects that have an EIR prepared.
C‐4.9: Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and housing
into major development projects to reduce vehicle use. Ongoing and encouraged for applicable projects.
C‐4.10: Allow the application of transportation management rideshare
programs, integration of complementary land uses, and other methods to
reduce project related average daily and peak hour vehicle trips to achieve
consistency with allocated trip budgets.
This is considered on a project by project basis.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 26
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Objective C‐4B: Promote regional and local transit services as an alternative to automobile travel.
C‐4.11: Ensure that roadways designated as transit routes can
accommodate transit vehicle circulation and convenient pedestrian access
to and from transit stops.
Street improvements incorporate the accommodation of transit vehicle
circulation and pedestrian access on transit routes.
C‐4.12: Review all capital improvement projects to ensure improvements
located on existing and planned transit routes include modification of
street, curb, and sidewalk configurations to allow for easier and more
efficient transit operations and improved passenger access.
Ongoing. All improvement projects incorporate ADA facility
improvements, bus stop improvements and sidewalk enhancements,
including modification of street, curb, and sidewalk configurations.
C‐4.13: Provide transit stop amenities that facilitate access to and from
transit stops and transfer locations. These may include pedestrian
pathways approaching stops, high-quality benches and shelters, traveler
information systems (real‐time transit arrival information), and bike storage
and bicycle connections. Bus stops should accommodate timed transfers
between buses and other transit services where necessary.
To be implemented. Bus stop improvements and modification projects
are under development. Additional information will be provided with the
2021 annual review.
C‐4.14: Encourage new development along major transit corridors to
provide efficient and safe access to transit stops and public sidewalks.
Ongoing and encouraged for new development projects located along
major transit corridors.
C‐4.15: Support and participate with OCTA ACCESS Service in providing
transportation assistance to senior citizens and the disabled. The City participates and supports OCTA Access Services.
C‐4.16: Consult with OCTA for transit services, such as changes to bus
routes, bus stops, and hours of operation. Additionally, coordinate with
OCTA for changes to transit services provided for seniors, the disabled,
and transit dependent populations.
OCTA and the City collaborate on any proposed changes to transit
services.
C‐4.17: Consult with the Newport‐Mesa Unified School District to maintain
school bus services provided for local schoolchildren.
Ongoing. The City meets quarterly with the Newport-Mesa Unified School
District as part of the City/District Liaison Meeting and the City also sends
a representative to the monthly OC Fair Board meetings.
C‐4.18: Coordinate with OCTA to improve transit services in the City,
including strategies such as bus rapid transit, express services,
community circulators, and other strategies.
The City coordinates with OCTA to improve transit services and
participates on OCTA transit studies including review of an OCTA bus
rapid transit study.
C‐4.19: Encourage new local transit programs in coordination with OCTA,
consisting of shuttle services to local and regional destinations.
Ongoing. The City received Project V Transit Circulator grant funds from
OCTA for circulator bus in SoBECA area and South Coast Plaza which
ended in 2018 due to low ridership. The City is looking for future
opportunities and supportive of programs to local and regional
destinations.
C‐4.20: Coordinate with OCTA to construct bus turnouts at appropriate
locations, with attractive shelters designed for safe and comfortable use.
The City received a grant from OCTA to construct new bus shelters with
shade structure at three high ridership locations in the City.
C‐4.21: Require discussion of transit service needs and site design
amenities for transit ridership in EIR for major projects. Ongoing and required for major projects that have an EIR prepared.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 27
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Goal C‐5: Ensure Coordination between the Land Use and Circulation Systems
Objective C‐5A: Coordinate land use policies and development activities that support a sustainable transportation system.
C‐5.1: Ensure that new development projects are consistent with the
vehicular trip budgets, where adopted.
Staff reviews and ensures that new development projects are consistent
with vehicle trip budgets, where adopted.
C‐5.2: Require that large developments and redevelopments provide
short‐term and long‐term vehicular traffic impact studies.
Ongoing. City requires detailed traffic analysis for all new developments
that generate 50 or more trips at any intersection during peak hours.
C‐5.3: Encourage permitted General Plan land uses which generate high
traffic volumes to be located near major transit and transportation corridors
to minimize vehicle use, congestion, and delay.
Ongoing and encouraged for high traffic land uses.
C‐5.4: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by
phasing new developments to levels that can be accommodated by
roadways existing or planned to exist at the time of completion of each
phase of the project.
Planning and Transportation coordinate reviews of new developments
including phasing to make sure that the roadways can accommodate
each phase of the projects.
C‐5.5: Promote development of mixed-use projects to reduce number of
vehicle trips. This is reviewed at project level.
C‐5.6: Coordinate the design and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle
ways in major residential, shopping and employment centers, parks,
schools, other public facilities, public transportation facilities, and bicycle
networks with adjacent cities.
Public Services staff coordinate pedestrian and bicycle improvements with
adjacent cities and coordinate meetings to discuss with adjacent cities
including Newport Beach, Santa Ana, and Huntington Beach.
C‐5.7: Require dedication of right-of-way, in an equitable manner, for
development that increases the intensity of land use.
Ongoing. City requires dedication of right-of-way as development occurs
in accordance with Municipal Code requirements.
C‐5.8: Minimize circulation improvements that will necessitate the taking
of private property on existing developed properties. Circulation improvements that require right-of-way are minimized.
C‐5.9: Require that circulation necessary to provide or attain the
minimum traffic level of service standard at an intersection to which a
development project contributes measureable traffic be completed within
three years of issuance of the first building permit for such development
project, unless additional right-of-way or coordination with other
government agencies is required to complete the improvement.
Improvements may be required sooner if, because of extraordinary traffic
generation characteristics of the project or extraordinary impacts to the
surrounding circulation system, such improvements are necessary to
prevent significant adverse impacts.
Ongoing and required as needed.
C‐5.10: Allow for construction of circulation improvements for a phased
development project to be constructed commensurate with the project
construction, based upon the findings of a traffic study approved by the
City of Costa Mesa.
This is allowed based on findings of an approved traffic study.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 28
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
C‐5.11: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by
phasing new development to levels that can be accommodated by
roadways existing or planned to exist at the time of completion of each
phase of the project.
Planning and Transportation coordinate reviews of new developments
including phasing to make sure that the roadways can accommodate
each phase of the projects.
C‐5.12: Support consistency with the Orange County Sustainable
Communities Strategy (OC SCS) and SCAG RTP/SCS by providing an
integrated land use and transportation plan to meet mandated emissions
reduction targets consistent with SB 375.
Ongoing. The City’s General Plan Land Use Element and Circulation
Element are consistent with SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan and
Sustainable Communities Strategy toward meeting Statewide emissions
reduction targets.
Objective C‐5B: Establish strategies and processes that allow large developments to analyze and mitigate traffic impacts and infrastructure needs.
C‐5.13: Require that new development projects improve access to and
accommodations for multimodal transportation.
New development projects are reviewed to require multimodal access and
accommodations.
C‐5.14: Require developers of new building and redevelopment/reuse
projects as part of the project development review process that are located
along bus routes to pay a designated fair share of the cost of providing
improved bus stop facilities and related street furniture or, where
appropriate, dedicate land for improved bus stop facilities.
Ongoing and required for applicable development projects.
C‐5.15: Consider the needs of the transportation and infrastructure system
early for large developments and coordinate with developers to design
projects that minimize traffic impacts and infrastructure demands, and
implement complete streets wherever feasible. Alternatively, address
transportation and infrastructure system impacts through the
implementation of development agreements.
Planning and Transportation coordinate early reviews of large
developments to minimize traffic impacts and implement complete streets
when feasible.
Goal C‐6: Fund and Evaluate the City’s Transportation Network
Objective C‐6A: Pursue funding sources to maintain and enhance the transportation and infrastructure system.
C‐6.1: Evaluate traffic collision data regularly, and identify top collision
locations for automobiles, bicycles, pedestrians, transit in Costa Mesa.
Develop appropriate countermeasures and pursue funding from all
available sources to implement them.
Transportation and Police Department meet quarterly to identify top
collision locations, evaluate the collision data, and coordinate work effort
for appropriate counter measures. Also, the City received a grant to
develop a Local Road Safety Plan which is underway. This project will
develop a Local Road Safety Plan for all modes including walking and
bicycling which will help ongoing efforts to make safety improvements by
analyzing crash data, identifying emphasis areas, and countermeasures
through public outreach and diverse stakeholder collaboration.
C‐6.2: Continue to develop and maintain long‐range capital improvement
programs consistent with the General Plan and M2 eligibility requirements.
Ongoing. City submits an annual report to OCTA for Measure M2
eligibility.
C‐6.3: Coordinate with OCTA to fund, develop, and maintain a Master
Plan of Streets and Highways consistent with the Master Plan of Arterial
Highways (MPAH).
The City routinely coordinates with OCTA on grant funding opportunities
to maintain the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 29
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
C‐6.4: Require a locally collected and administered traffic mitigation fee
program to guarantee that new development pays for its fair share toward
improvements resulting in reductions in air pollutant and GHG emissions
and traffic impacts generated by the development.
City completed annual review of the traffic impact fee and updated the
traffic impact fee to include ATP projects as eligible under the program.
C‐6.5: Actively pursue local, State, and federal funding to implement,
maintain, and evaluate the transportation and infrastructure system.
The City actively pursues grant funding opportunities through OCTA,
SCAG, State, and Federal funds.
C‐6.6: Supplement funding from annual fees or assessments on existing
and new development with grants and other nonlocal sources.
The City actively pursues grant funding opportunities through OCTA,
SCAG, State, and Federal funds.
C‐6.7: Develop strategies to implement an infrastructure and
transportation system to be consistent with State policies on resiliency and
sustainability.
The City Costa Mesa is committed to enhancing and expanding its
sustainability efforts to meet the State of California’s ambitious climate
and energy goals, while simultaneously achieving local objectives such as
reducing air pollution to improve public health, support the local economy
and build resilient infrastructure.
C‐6.8: Amend the General Plan, if necessary, to be responsive to
evolving funding requirements and to comply with State and federal
regulations affecting the goals and policies of the Circulation Element.
Ongoing and amended as needed.
C‐6.9: Coordinate with OCTA and Caltrans to seek funding and
implementation solutions to improve Newport Boulevard at the terminus of
the State Route 55 freeway to relieve congestion from regional traffic.
Ongoing coordination with OCTA continuing. Also, City is designing
Newport Blvd. rehabilitation project from Bristol St. to 19th St. (both
northbound and southbound) that can help relieve congestion.
C‐6.10: Review the City’s transportation impact fee program on a regular
basis, and adjust fees as needed to ensure that funding is available for
planned transportation improvements that will benefit all travel modes.
City completed an annual review of the traffic impact fee study and
updated the traffic impact fee. Active Transportation projects are
included in the fee program. Periodic reviews will be conducted.
C‐6.11: Prioritize funding and timing for implementing transportation
improvements. Consider prioritizing multimodal projects that provide the
most benefit to all users.
The majority of current and proposed CIP projects in the Transportation
Division are active transportation/multi-modal projects.
C‐6.12: Require that every new development project pay its share of costs
associated with the mitigation of project generated impacts.
Every new development is required to pay its share of costs associated
with mitigation to project impacts.
C‐6.13: Measure M2 sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace
private funding which has been committed for any project.
Measure M2 requires that M2 funds do not supplant developer fee
requirements.
C‐6.14: The City’s seven-year capital improvement program shall be
adopted and maintained in conformance with the provisions of Measure
M2 for the purpose of maintaining the established level of service
standard.
The City's capital improvement program is reviewed, revised, maintained,
and adopted annually in conformance with Measure M2.
C‐6.15: Maintain a traffic impact fee for circulation system improvements
to the Master Plan of Streets and Highways; review and update fees on a
regular basis.
The City's traffic impact fee is reviewed, updated, and adopted by the City
Council annually.
Objective C‐6B: Evaluate the transportation system to ensure that it meets the City’s circulation goals.
C‐6.16: Provide an annual Capital Improvement Program General Plan
consistency report.
Ongoing. The CIP is annually reviewed by the Planning Commission prior
to its adoption to ensure consistency with General Plan.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 30
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
C‐6.17: Provide annual public review of implementation status reports of
goals, policies, and objectives stated in the Circulation Element.
Ongoing through this annual report provided to the Planning Commission
and City Council.
C‐6.18: Adopt and seek out methods and processes that provide
appropriate and accurate data for evaluating the performance of the
transportation and infrastructure system.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
Goal C-7: Promote a Friendly Active Transportation System in Costa Mesa
Bikeways and Pedestrian Paths
Objective C-7A:Expand, enhance, and protect the existing bicycle and pedestrian network to provide a comprehensive, system of Class I,
Class II, Class III, and Class IV facilities to increase connectivity between homes, jobs, schools transit, and recreational resources in Costa Mesa.
Recommendation C-7.1: Develop an extensive bicycle and
pedestrian backbone network through the use of standard and appropriate
innovative treatments.
An Active Transportation Plan was developed and reviewed by the
Bikeway and Walkability Committee, Planning Commission and by the
public. The Active Transportation Plan was adopted by the City Council in
June 2018. This Plan focuses on the completion of the bicycle network by
identifying existing and missing bikeway segments to improve connectivity
and providing recommendations for potential improvements to the system
and programs. The City received grant funding for the development of a
Pedestrian Master Plan project which is underway.
Recommendation C-7.2: Plan and install new bicycle lanes on
Major Arterials, where feasible and appropriate.
The Active Transportation and Bicycle Master Plan provide the plan for
new bicycle lanes on Major Arterials. The City pursues local and grant
funds for new Class II bicycle lanes.
Recommendation C-7.3: Plan and install shared lane markings
(“sharrows”) and signage on appropriate existing and planned bicycle
routes where bicycle lane implementation is demonstrated to be infeasible.
Ongoing. Sharrows will be installed on streets identified with Class III
bicycle facilities.
Recommendation C-7.4: Where feasible, Class I shared-use paths
should be a priority for future developments.
The Active Transportation and Bicycle Master Plan provide the plan for
Class II shared use paths. The new development project, the Press,
incudes a Class I shared use path through the development project.
Recommendation C-7.5: Plan and install new shared-use paths in
utility corridors and/or along flood control channels, and extend existing
bicycle and shared-use paths.
The City's Active Transportation Plan identifies new shared use paths and
extensions. The City is pursuing grant funding opportunities for these
planned projects.
Recommendation C-7.6: Plan and complete north/south multi-
purpose and bicycle routes through the City to augment the east/west
route.
The Active Transportation Plan and Bicycle Master Plan provide the plan
for multi-purpose and bicycle routes. The City's CIP plan identifies
implementation timing for north/south routes in the ATP.
Recommendation C-7.7: Consider the identification and feasibility
of potential Class IV cycle tracks.
Final design of Merrimac Way Class IV has been completed and project
construction is underway.
Recommendation C-7.8: When feasible, implement the completion
through regional coordination of the Costa Mesa roadway and trail
segments of regional bikeway plans.
The Active Transportation Plan and Bicycle Master Plan provide the plan
for bike trails and connection to the regional bicycle network.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 31
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Recommendation C-7.9: Encourage reallocation of roadway rights-
of-way where appropriate to accommodate shared-use path and bicycle
facilities, while preserving and respecting the character of each adjacent
neighborhood.
Ongoing.Roadway right-of-way was reallocated to implement new Class
II bicycle lanes and widen existing bicycle lanes by narrowing vehicle
travel lanes. In some areas, buffered Class II bicycle lanes were
implemented. Project examples include Bear Street, Hamilton Street, and
Santa Ana Avenue. In addition, green bicycle conflict zone markings were
implemented.
Recommendation C-7.10: Support bicycle improvement projects that
close gaps in the regional bicycle network either by implementing specific
projects recommended in the Plan or through other treatments.
The Active Transportation Plan and Bicycle Master Plan provide the plan
to close gaps and connect to the regional bicycle network.
Recommendation C-7.11: Encourage bicycle projects that connect
local facilities and neighborhoods to major bicycle corridors.
The Active Transportation Plan and Bicycle Master Plan provide the plan
for connections to local facilities and neighborhoods.
Recommendation C-7.12: Work cooperatively with adjoining
jurisdictions and local/regional agencies to coordinate bicycle planning,
and implementation activities. Where required, develop consistent active
transportation plans and policies with regional and adjacent agencies.
As part of the development of the Bicycle Master Plan and Pedestrian
Master Plan, regional and adjacent agency plans and policies were
reviewed to ensure consistency. City staff meet and regularly coordinate
with adjacent cities including Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, and
Santa Ana.
Recommendation C-7.13: Prioritize safe access to major regional
trails such as the OC Loop/Santa Ana River Trail and the Newport Back
Bay Trail System. Where feasible, plan and provide a continuous low-
stress Class I and/or Class IV facility from east to west across the city
between these facilities.
To be implemented. Grant opportunities to be identified and pursued for
design and construction funds. The Adams Avenue project is under
design to provide Class I facilities in the east to west direction with access
to the Santa Ana River Trail.
Recommendation C-7.14: Explore favorable opportunities to remove
parking to accommodate bicycle lanes.
Opportunities will be explored for proposed Class II bike lanes on the
City's adopted Active Transportation Plan.
Recommendation C-7.15: Identify favorable opportunities to retain
parallel parking adjacent to sidewalks to maintain pedestrian safety.
Opportunities to retain parallel parking adjacent to sidewalks is routinely
identified during planning and design of capital improvement projects. An
example is the Randolph Avenue Improvements project which will be
constructed in FY 21-22 is retaining parallel parking adjacent to sidewalks
to maintain pedestrian safety.
Recommendation C-7.16: Consider every street in Costa Mesa as a
street that cyclists could use. Every street is considered to be used by all users including cyclists.
Recommendation C-7.17: Link on-road and off-road bicycle and
pedestrian facilities within Costa Mesa to existing and planned facilities in
adjacent and regional jurisdictions.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
Recommendation C-7.18: Low-stress design techniques should be
considered where necessary to attract a wide variety of users.
Ongoing.Low-stress design techniques are considered during the
planning and design of capital improvement projects.
Recommendation C-7.19: Establish designated safe routes to
schools for biking and walking.
Safe Route to School routes designated and provided to schools and
posted online.
Recommendation C-7.20: Designate walkable districts in the City. Ongoing. Pedestrian Master Plan is underway and will identify these.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 32
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Bike and Pedestrian Facilities
Objective C-7B:Provide end-of-trip facilities that support the bicycle network.
Recommendation C-7.21: Provide bike parking and bike-related
amenities at public facilities and along public rights-of-way.
Bike racks have been installed at public parks, public facilities, and along
public rights-of-way. Additional bike racks will continue to be installed at
public facilities.
Recommendation C-7.22: Pursue public-private partnerships to
furnish local businesses with secure bike parking and other related
amenities.
A commercial bicycle rack program has been identified by the Bikeway
and Walkability Committee and under development.
Recommendation C-7.23: Develop and adopt bicycle parking
equipment standards for bicycle parking to be installed within the public
right-of-way and post on the City website.
Bicycle racks have been installed in the public right of way at City Parks,
City facilities, and in commercial areas with the City's logo.
Recommendation C-7.24: Work with local schools and colleges to
provide ample and secure bike parking and other related amenities for
students and employees.
Ongoing. City staff meets with the Newport Mesa Unified School District
and Orange Coast College to discuss many topics including biking,
walking, and bike racks. A representative from the NMUSD is a
committee liaison on the City's Bikeway and Walkability Committee.
Recommendation C-7.25: Work with OCTA to maximize bicycle
amenities, such as bus stop solar lighting and bicycle lockers, at high-
volume transit stops.
The City received a grant from OCTA to construct new bus shelters with
shade structures and solar lighting at three high ridership locations in the
City.
Recommendation C-7.26: Prioritize the installation of bicycle-scale
and/or pedestrian-scale lighting.
Bicycle-scale and pedestrian-scale lighting are considered on
infrastructure projects.
Recommendation C-7.27: Encourage and incentivize providing
attended bicycle parking services, such as a bicycle valet, at major City
events, OC Fair, Farmers’ Markets, holiday festivals, and other community
events.
Due to the COVID pandemic, many community events were cancelled.
Will continue to encouraged provision of bicycle parking at major City
events including the OC Fair and at Chargers Training Camp.
Recommendation C-7.28: Prioritize schools with the highest auto
traffic volume during peak hours and insufficient parking for staff and
parents. Plan and install bicycle facilities adjacent those schools.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
Recommendation C-7.29: Provide bike parking and bike-related
amenities at public facilities and along public right-of-way.
Bike racks have been installed at public parks, public facilities, and along
public rights-of-way. Additional bike racks will be installed at public
facilities. Encouraged provision of bicycle parking at OC Fair and at
Chargers Training Camp and Concerts in the Park summer series.
Currently evaluating bike racks at Fairview Park.
“First and Last Mile” Programs
Objective C-7C:Encourage sustainable modes of transportation to fill gaps between the first and last miles of trips (walking, biking, ride sharing,
transit, taxi and car-sharing).
Recommendation C-7.30: Identify citywide infrastructure needed to
create the interconnected multi-trail system.
The Active Transportation Plan and Bicycle Master Plan provide the plan
and identify proposed multi-purpose trails and connections.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 33
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Recommendation C-7.31: Improve the quality, aesthetics, and
safety of high-use pedestrian corridors.
Ongoing. A Pedestrian Master Plan is under development which will
identify pedestrian improvement projects for high use pedestrian
corridors.
Recommendation C-7.32: Development and implement a bicycle
sharing system.
City reviewing mobility sharing options with Bikeway and Walkability
Committee.
Recommendation C-7.33: Proposed new mode split goals:
50 percent motor vehicles
10 percent transit
10 percent bicycles
20 percent walking
10 percent carpools, taxi, transportation network company services,
and car sharing
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
Recommendation C-7.34: Establish a goal for all trips of less than
three miles to be 30 percent by bicycle, and establish a goal of less than 1
mile to be 30 percent by walking.
Ongoing. The Active Transportation Plan adopted in 2018 by the City
Council includes this recommendation. Bicycling and walking trips are
encouraged including short trips of less than 3 and less than 1 mile.
Recommendation C-7.35: Consider implementing a small-scale
transportation system to encourage mode shift to popular destinations as
defined by users.
Ongoing.The Active Transportation Plan adopted in 2018 by the City
Council includes the City's Bicycle Master Plan. A Pedestrian Master
Plan is being developed and will identify improvements to pedestrian
routes to popular destinations.
Goal C-8: Create a Safer Place to Walk and Ride a Bicycle
Design and Way-finding
Objective C-8A:Develop bicycle and pedestrian facilities with approved uniform design standards, and implementation of way-finding signage
providing information on various destinations.
Recommendation C-8.1: Require that all facilities be designed in
accordance with the latest federal, state, and local standards. All facilities are designed to meet current design standards.
Recommendation C-8.2: Provide and maintain bicycle and
pedestrian signal detectors, informational signage, and lighting, along City
bikeways.
Pedestrian and bicycle detection is provided and maintained. The
detection at several locations upgraded with OCTA grants. Bicycle
wayfinding signage is proposed in the FY 21-22 CIP budget.
Recommendation C-8.3: Develop, install and maintain a bicycle
and pedestrian way-finding signage program to indicate route turns, the
presence of intersecting bikeways, streets and distances to nearby local
and major destinations.
A proposed bicycle wayfinding project is included for consideration in the
proposed FY 21-22 budget.
Recommendation C-8.4: Develop a list of acceptable plant
materials for shared use paths that will not damage, create security
problems or hazards for bicyclists. Incorporate canopy trees and native,
drought-tolerant landscaping as a standard Class I facility (shared use
path) feature. Encourage the use of sustainable drainage designs, such as
bio-swales.
Ongoing and being done already.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 34
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Recommendation C-8.5: Utilize Complete Streets elements as
demonstrated in most recent versions of National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Street Design Guide and Bikeway
Design Guide.
The most recent versions of the National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Street Design Guide and
Bikeway Design Guide are using when designing transportation facilities.
Recommendation C-8.6: Crosswalks will include high visibility
crossing treatments.
New projects include high visibility crosswalks. Projects which
implemented high visibility crosswalks include: Bear Street, Hamilton
Street, and Santa Ana Avenue.
Recommendation C-8.7: Paint direction arrows on all bike lanes
and bike paths to reduce the risk of collisions.
Directional arrows are installed on all bicycle lanes including
improvements to bike lanes, new bike lanes, and street resurfacing
projects.
Safety Enforcement and Reporting
Objective C-8B:Continue and expand enforcement activities that enhance safety of bicyclists on bike paths and roadways.
Recommendation C-8.8: Enforce laws that reduce
bicycle/pedestrian/motor vehicle incidents and conflicts. Ongoing enforcement to reduce these incidents and conflicts.
Recommendation C-8.9: Train police officers on bicyclists’ rights
and responsibilities and bicycle/pedestrian/vehicle collision evaluation. Ongoing training, as needed.
Recommendation C-8.10: Utilize the City’s bicycle-mounted patrol
officer program to educate and enforce pedestrian and bicycle user
violations not necessarily to punish, but to correct.
Ongoing utilization of this program for education and enforcement.
Recommendation C-8.11: Promote efficient reporting mechanisms
for behaviors that endanger cyclists and pedestrians. Ongoing by the Police Department and Code Enforcement Division.
Recommendation C-8.12: Develop a partnership with the school
community to establish and update suggested routes to schools for biking
and walking.
Suggested Routes to School maps were provided to all schools.
Safe Roadway Conditions
Objective C-8C:Maintain bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are clear of debris and provide safe conditions for all users.
Recommendation C-8.13: Establish routine maintenance
schedule/standards for bicycle and pedestrian facilities such as sweeping,
litter removal, landscaping, repainting of striping, signage, and signal
actuation devices.
The City's Maintenance Division has routine maintenance schedule and
standards for bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Recommendation C-8.14: Encourage and empower citizens to
report maintenance issues that impact bicyclist and pedestrian safety
including, but not limited to, potholes, sidewalk lifting, and overgrown
vegetation.
Costa Mesa Connect includes provision to notify bicycle-related issues to
the City.
Recommendation C-8.15: Establish procedures for responding to
citizen reports in a timely manner. Ongoing. Weekly meeting to discuss status of citizens requests.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 35
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Recommendation C-8.16: Where feasible, reduce or eliminate
conflict points such as driveways that cross the sidewalk.
Conflict points are reduced or eliminated where feasible as part of
transportation infrastructure projects such as median projects. A recent
project that reduced and eliminated conflict points is the Harbor Boulevard
median project.
Safety Education
Objective C-8D:Increase education of bicycle and pedestrian safety through programs and training of school children and the public.
Recommendation C-8.17: Create, fund, and implement bicycle-
safety curricula and provide to the public, tourists, various ethnic groups,
diverse ages and disadvantaged communities.
To be implemented.
Recommendation C-8.18: Provide multilingual bicycle-safety maps
and brochures (print and electronic versions) in languages that are widely
used in Costa Mesa.
To be implemented. Bicycle-safety maps and brochures provided in adult
and children English versions.
Recommendation C-8.19: Encourage schools to develop and
provide bicycle-safety curricula for use in elementary, middle, and high
schools, such as the Bicycle Rodeo events.
Ongoing. Bicycle Rodeo events conducted by Costa Mesa Police
Department.
Recommendation C-8.20: Support marketing and public awareness
campaigns aimed at improving bicycle and pedestrian safety.
Public Services and the Public Information Office collaborate on
marketing and public awareness campaigns to improve bicycle and
pedestrian safety. This includes May as National Bike Month and Walk to
School Day in the Fall.
Recommendation C-8.21: Provide a user education program
developed and promoted to encourage proper trail use and etiquette. To be implemented.
Recommendation C-8.22: Work with local bicycle advocacy
organizations to develop, promote and support a series of bicycle
education classes. Include information on bicycle safety, maintenance,
and security.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
Recommendation C-8.23: Develop and distribute education material
regarding bicycle and pedestrian responsibilities and laws.
Ongoing. A bicycle map and safety guide was developed and distributed
in both adult and children versions.
Safety Data
Objective C-8E:Monitor and analyze bicycle and pedestrian safety.
Recommendation C-8.24: Request bicycle and pedestrian collision
reports from local law enforcement periodically and consider
improvements to address problem areas.
Ongoing. The development of a Local Road Safety Plan and Pedestrian
Master Plan is underway.
Recommendation C-8.25: Establish an expedited process to report
maintenance and safety concerns, e.g. pavement markings (sharrows,
missing bike lane lines), ramps, curb cut-outs, broken walk/bike signal
buttons, signage, minor maintenance of bike lanes/paths (street/path
sweeping, minor surface patching, inoperable traffic signal bicycle
detection).
Costa Mesa Connect includes provision to report maintenance and safety
concerns.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 36
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Recommendation C-8.26: Conduct Roadside Safety Audits (RSAs)
on a regular basis to provide periodic snapshots of roadway safety,
including bicycle, pedestrian, equestrian, skateboard, and other non-
motorized modes of travel.
The development of a Local Road Safety Plan is planned for 2021.
Additional information will be provided with the 2021 annual review.
Goal C-9: Integrate Active Transportation Elements into Circulation System and Land Use Planning
Land Use Planning Decisions and Active Transportation
Objective C-9A:Consider bicycle and pedestrian facilities during land use planning process.
Recommendation C-9.1: Incorporate the Costa Mesa Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan into the City’s General Plan.
The City’s General Plan was updated with the adopted Active
Transportation Plan in June 2018. The Active Transportation Plan
includes a Bicycle Master Plan. The City received grant funding for the
development of a Pedestrian Master Plan project which is currently in
progress.
Recommendation C-9.2: Ensure that all current and proposed land
use planning is consistent with the Costa Mesa Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan.
The Active Transportation Plan with a Bicycle Master Plan is part of
overall City’s General Plan Circulation Element. The City received grant
funding for the development of a Pedestrian Master Plan project which is
currently in progress.
Recommendation C-9.3: Require new developments provide
adequate bicycle parking and pedestrian access. Ongoing and required for new developments.
Recommendation C-9.4: Collaborate with property owners to
increase bicycle parking over time.
Ongoing and encouraged for projects. The City's zoning code allows for a
credit of one parking space due to the provision of bicycle racks.
Recommendation C-9.5: Encourage the integration of compatible
land uses and housing into major development projects to reduce vehicle
use.
Ongoing and encouraged when applicable for major development
projects.
Recommendation C-9.6: Provide a fully integrated network of
modern active transportation facilities to and from major activity centers
and residential centers.
The Active Transportation Plan and Bicycle Master Plan provide a plan for
an active transportation network. The Pedestrian Master Plan is currently
underway.
Recommendation C-9.7: Identify areas where an increase in the
need for active transportation can reasonably be anticipated due to
housing/business growth.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
Recommendation C-9.8: Make commercial and recreational areas
more enjoyable for pedestrians by implementing measures such as
providing shade, planting trees, eliminating visible parking lots and vacant
land, and minimizing long stretches of building façade.
Ongoing - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan expected to
be approved/adopted in 2021/2022.
Recommendation C-9.9: Develop creative, artistic, and functional
bicycle parking solutions, and install them throughout the City as a
standard.
Ongoing. Custom Artistic City Bike racks have been installed at public
parks, public facilities, and along public rights-of-way.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 37
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Active Transportation in Developments
Objective C-9B:Integrate bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements during planning, design and implementation of transportation projects.
Recommendation C-9.10: Promote the preservation of bicycle
access within all roadway rights-of-way, as well as the development of
innovative, safety-enhanced on-street facilities, such as bicycle boulevards
and cycle tracks.
Ongoing.Bicycle access is preserved for street capital improvement
projects. The design and construction of innovative bicycle projects are
underway including the construction of Merrimac cycle tracks and
implementation of bike boxes.
Recommendation C-9.11: Establish bike boulevards on streets with
low traffic volumes and slow speeds to encourage bicycling.
Bicycle Boulevards have been identified and included in the adopted
Active Transportation Plan.
Recommendation C-9.12: Proactively seek new opportunities for
acquisition of abandoned rights-of-way and other lands for the
development of new multi-use pathways that integrate with the planned
network.
Ongoing. Both the Press/Anduril development and One Metro West
projects are proposing new multi-use paths integrating with the planned
network as identified in the City's Active Transportation Plan.
Recommendation C-9.13: Improve the safety of all road users
through the implementation of neighborhood traffic-calming treatments.
Traffic calming improvements are being implemented on neighborhood
streets. Traffic calming design plans have been developed for
neighborhood streets including Meyer Place, Pomona Avenue, Randolph
Avenue, and Hamilton Street.
Recommendation C-9.14 Detours through or around construction
zones should be designed for safety and convenience, and with adequate
signage for cyclists and pedestrians.
Traffic control plans are reviewed for all construction detours and
designed for safety with adequate signage for cyclists and pedestrians.
Recommendation C-9.15: Provide opportunity for public input prior
to the removal of an existing bicycle or pedestrian facility or the approval
of any development or street improvement that would preclude these
planned facilities.
An opportunity for public input for any removals of existing bicycle and
pedestrian facilities will be provided if this type of proposal comes forward.
Goal C-10: Promote an Active Transportation Culture
An Active Transportation Culture
Objective C-10A: Encourage more people to walk and bicycle by supporting programs that foster community support for bicycling and walking, and
raise public awareness about active transportation.
Recommendation C-10.1: Support marketing and public awareness
campaigns through a variety of media aimed at promoting bicycling and
walking as a safe, healthy, cost-effective, environmentally friendly
transportation choice.
Public Services and the Public Information Office collaborate on
marketing and public awareness campaigns to promote and improve
bicycle and pedestrian safety. This includes May as National Bike Month
and Walk to School Day in the Fall. In addition, SCAG Go Human signs
are periodically installed throughout the City to promote biking and
walking.
Recommendation C-10.2: Support programs aimed at increasing
bicycle and walk trips by providing incentives, recognition, or services that
make bicycling and walking a more convenient transportation mode.
The City supports SCAG and OCTA programs that provide incentives for
biking and walking. Bicycle helmets and bike lights have been distributed
by OCTA in the City at the City's request.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 38
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Recommendation C-10.3: Promote bicycling and walking at City-
sponsored and public events, such as Earth Day, Bike to Work
Day/Month, farmers’ markets, public health fairs, art walks, craft fairs, and
civic events.
Ongoing. Staff will work with event organizers to promote bicycle parking
and access.
Recommendation C-10.4: Encourage and promote bicycle related
businesses within Costa Mesa including, but not limited to, involvement of
civic clubs and organizations.
Ongoing and encouraged when applicable and appropriate.
Recommendation C-10.5: Promote active transportation events in
Costa Mesa to raise awareness and encourage bicycling, including, but
not limited to, those that may involve temporary road closures, bike to
work/school, senior walks, historic walks, and ciclovías.
The City promotes May as National Bike Month, OCTA's bike challenge,
and Walk to School in the Fall.
Recommendation C-10.6: Encourage major employment centers
and employers to promote commuting by bicycle including the use of flex-
time work schedules to support non-rush bicycle commuting. Build a
coalition with City, businesses, schools, and residents to promote active
transportation.
Ongoing effort; in addition the City's Bikeway and Walkability Committee
includes a representative from the Costa Mesa Chamber of Commerce.
Recommendation C-10.7: Encourage participation in bicycle and
pedestrian promotion activities by education facilities, arts programs,
active transportation clubs, and entertainment providers.
To be implemented.
Recommendation C-10.8: Achieve “Silver Level Bicycle Friendly
Community” by League of American Bicyclists by 2025. To be implemented.
Recommendation C-10.9: Achieve “Walk Friendly Community”
status from WalkFriendly.org by 2025. To be implemented.
Recommendation C-10.10: Achieve “HEAL City” designation by 2017.
To be implemented. Bikeway and Walkability Committee developing a
resolution for City Council to consider. Additional information will be
provided with the 2021 annual review.
Goal C-11: Promote the Positive Air Quality, Health, and Economic Benefits of Active Transportation
Improving the Environment with Active Transportation
Objective C-11A: Improve air quality and public health and reduce ambient noise by promoting Active Transportation programs.
Recommendation C-11.1: Determine baseline emissions levels,
then track and communicate changes in emissions as modes of
transportation trips shift to encourage more walking and biking.
To be implemented.
Recommendation C-11.2: Improve the quality of life in Costa Mesa
by reducing neighborhood traffic and noise.
Ongoing. The Active Transportation Plan adopted in 2018 by the City
Council includes the City's Bicycle Master Plan. A Pedestrian Master
Plan is being developed. Both encourage reduction of vehicle trips by
encouraging biking and walking.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 39
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Recommendation C-11.3: Increase pedestrian and bicycle trips,
thereby reducing vehicle trips and vehicle miles Traveled.
Ongoing. The Active Transportation Plan adopted in 2018 by the City
Council includes the City's Bicycle Master Plan. A Pedestrian Master
Plan is being developed. Both encourage reduction of vehicle trips by
encouraging biking and walking.
Recommendation C-11.4: Coordinate with appropriate federal, state,
and county health agencies on active transportation programs to achieve
health benefits.
To be implemented.
Economic and Other Incentives
Objective C-11B: Provide economic incentives for expanding and enhancing bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Recommendation C-11.5: Incentivize the business community to
support pedestrians and bicycle users in tangible ways.
The Traffic Impact Fee includes a five percent (5%) reduction in
automobile trips for developments proposing to implement active
transportation improvements beyond typical development requirements.
Recommendation C-11.6: Partner with the business and school
communities to create a marketing strategy to encourage individual
businesses to market Costa Mesa as a bicycle-friendly City.
Ongoing effort; in addition the City's Bikeway and Walkability Committee
includes a representative from the Costa Mesa Chamber of Commerce.
Recommendation C-11.7: Encourage developers to include
features, amenities and programs that are proven to increase walking
and/or bicycling.
Developers are encouraged to include design features, amenities and
programs to promote walking and biking.
Recommendation C-11.8: Offer incentives for businesses whose
employees walk or bike to work. To be implemented.
Recommendation C-11.9: Encourage the Chamber of Commerce
and the business community to promote active transportation in
commercial areas to stimulate economic vitality.
Representative from the Chamber of Commerce is a liaison on the
Bikeway and Walkability Committee.
Goal C-12: Monitor, Evaluate, and Pursue Funding for Implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Objective 12A:Continuously monitor and evaluate Costa Mesa’s implementation progress on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan policies,
programs, and projects.
Recommendation C-12.1: Establish a monitoring program to
measure the effectiveness and benefits of the Costa Mesa Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan.
To be implemented.
Recommendation C-12.2: Track citywide trends in active
transportation through the use of Census data, bicycle and pedestrian
counts, travel surveys, and online surveys as part of annual reviews of the
General Plan.
To be implemented.
Recommendation C-12.3: Ensure that Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan programs and projects are implemented in an equitable
manner geographically, socioeconomically, and serving disadvantaged
communities.
The Pedestrian Master Plan is underway. The Bicycle Master Plan is
being implemented with recommendations from the Bikeway and
Walkability Committee.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 40
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Fund the Plans
Objective C-12B: Pursue grants and other sources of funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects.
Recommendation C-12.4: Strategize use of resources on
developing effective and efficient grant application and program
administration.
Ongoing. The City routinely identifies grant opportunities and submits
applications for grant funds through many funding sources including
Federal grants, Caltrans, Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG), and OCTA.
Recommendation C-12.5: Pursue multiple sources of funding and
support efforts to maintain or increase federal, state and local funding for
the implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
The City actively pursues grant funding opportunities through OCTA,
SCAG, State, and Federal funding programs.
Recommendation C-12.6: Consider designating a portion of
development traffic impact fees to fund bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
The City Council approved traffic impact fees to fund active transportation
plan projects.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goal GM-1: Inter-jurisdictional Coordination
Objective GM-1A: Coordinate land use and transportation planning policies with State, regional, and local growth management efforts.
GM-1.1 Cooperate with the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA) and other jurisdictions on development, all future regional
transportation plans, and land use planning on a countywide basis.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
GM-1.2: Coordinate population, housing, and employment projections
with the State Department of Finance, Southern California Association of
Governments, Center for Demographic Research, Newport-Mesa Unified
School District, and County of Orange agencies in terms of infrastructure
planning.
Ongoing. Annual reports are provided to CDR, SCAG, Dept. of Finance
and Newport Mesa Unified for potential growth in the City.
GM-1.3: Work with inter-jurisdictional forums such as the City-County
Coordinating Committee to make sure that the City's fees are consistent
with minimally acceptable impact fees in the region.
The City’s Planning fees were updated in 2019.In 2020, the City Council
adopt a Resolution establishing fees in connection with applications for
the modification of marijuana business permits (Measure X). Also in 2020,
the City Council adopted a Resolution establishing fees in connection with
Wireless Telecommunications Ordinance and associated Wireless
Telecommunications Use Permit.
GM-1.4: Participate in inter-jurisdictional planning forums to discuss
implementation of traffic improvements, cooperative land use planning,
and appropriate mitigation measures for developments with
multijurisdictional impacts.
Ongoing participation in local and regional planning forums as it relates to
traffic improvements, land use planning and mitigation measures for
developments with multijurisdictional impacts.
GM-1.5: Continue to require that any new large developments prepare a
master plan and environmental impact analysis. This allows the City to
anticipate the impacts of large projects prior to development of any portion
and permits more time to plan for public services and facilities needed to
support the project.
Ongoing. Large scale projects either require a legislative act or are
located in overlay districts that require a Master Plan and full
environmental analysis. All impacts will need to be analyzed and included
in the project report.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 41
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Goal GM-2: Integration of Land Use and Transportation Planning
Objective GM-2A: Maintain the Level of Service standards by integration of land use and transportation planning
GM-2.1: Ensure that land use designations are reflected in the sub-
regional county model and SCAG’s model through consistent assumptions
and methodologies.
Ongoing. Provided comments/revisions for the City’s land use information
in the sub-regional and SCAG planning scenario models and databases.
GM-2.2: Coordinate with State, county, and local agencies for planning
and construction of public utilities to minimize negative impacts on the
circulation system.
Ongoing coordination with Caltrans and OCTA.
GM-2.3: Use the Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring
Program to assess the impact of existing and new development on the
circulation system.
The Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program
(DPPMP) Report is no longer a requirement for the Measure M Program.
Staff continues to monitor major intersections for any significant issues
and program improvements accordingly and reviews each project in terms
of traffic impacts.
GM-2.4: Support uses and development which create synergistic
relationships with neighboring uses and development, especially those
whose addition does not create mutually exclusive additional vehicular
trips but adds to the value of the destination by any potential visitor.
Ongoing and supported for uses and developments, as proposed.
GM-2.5: Support creative and flexible solutions that provide for additional
economic or physical growth within the City but does not place greater
impact on the circulation system. These would include shared parking
agreements, offset hours of operation, and clustering of harmonious and
supportive uses.
Ongoing and supported as proposed, typically processed for projects
requesting to deviate from the City's parking requirements.
HOUSING ELEMENT
Goal HOU-1: Preservation and Enhancement
Preserve the availability of existing housing opportunities and conserve as well as enhance the quality of existing dwelling units and residential
neighborhoods.
HOU-1.1: Develop standard and/or guidelines for new development with
emphasis on site (including minimum site security lighting) and building
design to minimize vulnerability to criminal activity.
Ongoing. This concept is reviewed during the planning application
process and new multiple family residential development projects are
subject to a standard condition of approval.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 42
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
HOU-1.2: Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including
but not limited to mobile home parks and manufactured home parks, from
the encroachment of incompatible or potentially disruptive land uses
and/or activities.
There have been no new development affecting stabilized residential
neighborhoods or mobile home parks. The City has taken additional
action to protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including (i)
adoption of a Multiple Family Group Home Ordinance on November 17,
2015 to limit the number and concentration of group homes and sober
living facilities in the Multiple Family Residential zones.In 2020, the City
conducted a study session with the City Council on Short Term Housing
and Rentals, and subsequently adopted a moratorium prohibiting the
establishment and/or operation of Short Term Rentals within all zoning
districts of the City.
HOU-1.3: Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or
abandoned vehicles, outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal building
and establish regulations to abate weed-filled yards when any of the
above is deemed to constitute a health, safety or fire hazard.
Ongoing through the implementation and enforcement of Title 20 –
Property Maintenance, of the Municipal Code. Title 20 establishes
standards to ensure proper maintenance, removal of hazardous and
improper storage, and removal of weeds and other public nuisances.
HOU-1.4: Establish code enforcement as a high priority and provide
adequate funding and staffing to support code enforcement programs.
Ongoing prioritization of code enforcement, as it relates to funding and
staffing to support their programs.
HOU-1.5: Install and upgrade public service facilities (streets, alleys, and
utilities) to encourage increased private market investments in declining or
deteriorating neighborhoods.
Ongoing as funding is available.
HOU-1.6: Continue existing rehabilitation loan and grant programs for
low and moderate-income homeowners as long as funds are available. Ongoing as funding is available.
HOU-1.7: Minimize the displacement of existing residences due to public
projects.
Ongoing when applicable. There has been no public project that resulted
in displacement of any residents.
HOU-1.8: Encourage the development of housing that fulfills specialized
needs. Ongoing and encouraged when and where applicable/appropriate.
Goal HOU-2: Preserving and Expanding Affordable Housing Opportunities
Provide a range of housing choices for all social and economic segments of the community, including housing for persons with special needs.
HOU-2.1: Encourage concurrent applications (i.e., rezones, tentative
tract maps, conditional use permits, variance request, etc.) if multiple
approvals are required, and if consistent with applicable processing
requirements.
Ongoing. Applications for multiple family residential projects requiring
multiple approvals are generally processed concurrently.
HOU-2.2: Promote the use of State density bonus provisions to
encourage the development of affordable housing for lower and moderate
income households, as well as senior housing.
All units under density bonus agreements with the City are monitored on
an annual basis.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 43
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
HOU-2.3: Provide incentive bonus units to encourage the redevelopment
of residential units that are nonconforming in terms of density. The
incentive shall be limited to the multi-family residential land use
designations. The density incentive shall be limited to an increase of 25
percent above the Medium-Density or an increase of 50 percent above
High-Density. In no case shall the resulting number of units exceed the
existing number of units on each site.
Ongoing. Property owners are encouraged to redevelop the site bringing
them into conformance with keeping the same number of units.
HOU-2.4: Encourage developers to employ innovative or alternative
construction methods to reduce housing costs and increase housing
supply.
Ongoing. Most housing construction of wrap and podium product is done
with wood construction reducing construction cost.
HOU-2.5: Continue membership in the Orange County Housing Authority
to provide rental assistance to very low income households.
Ongoing, the City maintains an ongoing membership with the Orange
County Housing Authority.
HOU-2.6: Provide clear rules, policies, and procedures, for reasonable
accommodation in order to promote equal access to housing. Policies and
procedures should be ministerial and include but not be limited to
identifying who may request a reasonable accommodation (i.e., persons
with disabilities, family-members, landlords, etc.), timeframes for decision-
making, and provisions for relief from the various land-use, zoning, or
building regulations that ma constrain the housing for persons of
disabilities.
The Zoning Code includes regulations that address reasonable
accommodation per State requirements. In March of 2013, the City
adopted an Ordinance, in accordance with Senate Bill 2, to permit
emergency shelters by right in the Planned Development Industrial zone.
The Ordinance also created provisions for transitional housing and
supportive housing that would allow these uses to be subject only to those
restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the
same zone. This section is regularly updated to be consistent with State
requirements.
HOU-2.7: Monitor the implementation of the City’s ordinances, codes,
policies, and procedures to ensure they comply with the “reasonable
accommodation” for disable provisions and all fair housing laws.
Ongoing.This section is regularly updated to be consistent with State
requirements.
Goal HOU-3: Provisions of Adequate Sites
Provide adequate, suitable sites for residential use and development or maintenance of a range of housing that varies sufficiently in terms of cost,
design, size, location, and tenure to meet the housing needs of all segment of the community at a level that can be supported by infrastructure.
HOU-3.1: Encourage the conversion of existing marginal or vacant
motels, commercial, and/or industrial land to residential, where feasible
and consistent with environmental conditions that are suitable for new
residential development.
Ongoing. In 2006, the City adopted three Urban Plans to encourage the
conversion of existing marginal or vacant industrial land in the West Side
to mixed-use and residential developments. To date, a total of 966 units
have been approved in the Urban Plans.
HOU-3.2: Provide opportunities for the development of well planned and
designed project which, through vertical or horizontal integration, provide
for the development of compatible residential, commercial, industrial,
institutional, or public uses within a single project or neighborhood.
Reviewed and considered with development projects. The City is currently
reviewing a mixed-use project (One Metro West) with 1,057 residential
units, 6,000 SF of commercial retail and 25,000 SF of office space,
proposed north of the 405 Freeway that allows for horizontal and vertical
mixed use within a single project.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 44
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
HOU-3.3: Cooperate with large employers, the Chamber of Commerce,
and major commercial and industrial developers to identify and implement
programs to balance employment growth with the ability to provide
housing opportunities affordable to the incomes of the newly created job
opportunities.
Ongoing. The One Metro West project has the potential to provide
affordable housing located within close proximity to jobs.
HOU-3.4: Consider the potential impact on housing opportunities and
existing residential neighborhoods when reviewing rezone petitions
affecting residential properties.
Ongoing and reviewed for all rezone applications.
HOU-3.5: Encourage transit-oriented development along transportation
corridors.
Ongoing. Under the City’s Urgency Ordinance (Ordinance 19-19),
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) developments are not subject to parking
requirements if located within a half mile of a transit stop.
Goal HOU-4: Equal Housing Opportunity
Ensure that all existing and future housing opportunities are open and available to all social and economic segments of the community without
discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability/medical conditions, national origin or ancestry, marital status, age,
household composition or size, source of income, or any other arbitrary factors.
HOU-4.1: Support the intent and spirit of equal housing opportunities as
express in Federal and State fair housing laws.
Ongoing and to be incorporated as part of the Housing Element Update
process.
HOU-4.2: Continue to provide fair housing and counseling services for all
Costa Mesa residents in an effort to remove barriers and promote access
to affordable housing in the City.
Ongoing and to be incorporated as part of the Housing Element Update
process.
HOU-4.3: Encourage programs that address the housing needs of senior
citizens. The 2013-2021 Housing Element was adopted by City Council on January
21, 2014. The Housing Element includes special programs for special
housing needs (i.e., seniors, large families, etc.). Throughout 2020, the
City has an aggressive approach to update its Housing Element and meet
the State’s October 2021 deadline, including City Council approval of a
consultant contract as well as an extensive public outreach plan. The City
has also conducted study sessions with the City Council and has been
approved for, and accepted, the Local Early Action Planning (LEAP)
Grant from HCD to assist with the City’s efforts. Also during 2020, City
worked on drafting an ordinance related to Accessory Dwelling Units and
Junior Accessory Dwelling Units, to be consistent with state law.
HOU-4.4: Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and
preservation of residential developments which will meet the needs of
families and individuals with specialized housing requirements.
HOU-4.5: Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and
preservation of residential developments to meet the needs of the
developmentally disabled.
Goal HOU-5: Coordination and Cooperation
Coordinate local housing efforts with appropriate federal, state, regional, and local governments and/or agencies and to cooperate in the
implementation of intergovernmental housing programs to ensure maximum effectiveness in solving local and regional housing problems.
HOU-5.1: Investigate alternative intergovernmental arrangements and
program options to deal with area-wide housing issues and problems.
Ongoing and to be incorporated as part of the Housing Element Update
process.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 45
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Goal CON-1: Preserved and Restored Natural Coastal Habitat and Landforms
Objective CON-1.A: Evaluate existing biotic resources and preserve them in ecologically viable and natural conditions, where possible; and/or
restore and integrate these resources into the urban environment, where feasible.
CON-1.A.1: Natural habitat is essential to ensuring biodiversity and
protecting sensitive biological resources. Protect these areas and consult
with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Orange County Water
District, Orange County Parks, and other regional agencies to identify
areas for special protection, and establish appropriate protection
measures for these areas.
Staff has communicated with representatives from the Department of
USFW regarding biologically sensitive plant and animal species. Staff
also communicates with OC Parks, City of Torrance (Marsh Project),
Irvine Ranch Water District, Orange County River Park group and the US
Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). Staff also continues to dialogue and
meet with local, state and federal agencies as is related to Fairview Park
sensitive habitats and ecosystems.
CON-1.A.2: Contribute to regional biodiversity and the preservation of
rare, unique, and sensitive biological resources by maintaining functional
wildlife corridors and habitat linkages.
Increased protective fencing around vernal pools at Fairview Park and
incorporated seasonal fencing for trail closures around sensitive plant and
bird species. Restoration of vernal pools 4, 5, 6, 7 began in late 2019,
and is expected to continue into 2020.
CON-1.A.3: Coordinate with the United States Fish and Wildlife service,
the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other regulatory
agencies to mitigate project impacts affecting open and natural spaces.
Coordinated on projects including vernal pool restoration, protective
fencing, wetlands maintenance permitting and community events, all at
Fairview Park. In 2019, initial fly field surveying to evaluate the
compatibility of the field with Fairview Park began, with community
engagement meetings, surveys, and several methods of research for
comprehensive support and recommendation.
CON-1.A.4: Promote and protect native plant species within Fairview
Park, and remove and control the spread of invasive species, including
plants, animals, and fungi.
Held quarterly restoration public events and educational opportunities that
were free to the public and focused on removing invasive species of
plants on the east and west sides of Fairview Park. Held a community
restoration project for Love Costa Mesa Day.
CON-1.A.5: Ensure that all future development is reviewed with regard to
protecting natural topography and bluffs to preserve and enhance Costa
Mesa’s natural beauty.
Fairview Park Steering Committee to review all potential projects at
Fairview Park.
CON-1.A.6: Minimize soil depletion and erosion in development projects.
Prevent erosion caused by construction activities, and encourage
preservation of natural vegetation and topography.
Ongoing as developments are submitted for approval. Erosion control
plans are required with all grading permits.
CON-1.A.7: Improve access to large-scale natural areas in the City.
These areas should be open for controlled access to improve public
enjoyment. Access should be limited where natural habitat is extremely
sensitive. Work with transit agencies to improve connections and access
to open space and recreation facilities from all Costa Mesa
neighborhoods.
Repairs to the bluffs and adjacent trails at Fairview Park are underway,
making for a safer hiking/biking/walking experience.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 46
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CON-1.A.8: Require the provision of adequate visitor-serving on-site
parking facilities that do no impact sensitive resources within the Coastal
Zone.
City Staff coordinates with the local, state and federal agencies to ensure
all improvements are consistent with the Parks Master Plan.
CON-1.A.9: Coordinate the development of plans, policies, and design
standards for projects within the Coastal Zone with appropriate local,
regional, and federal agencies.
City Staff coordinates with the local, state and federal agencies to ensure
all improvements are consistent with the Parks Master Plan.
Goal CON-2: Conserved Natural Resources through Environmental Sustainability
Objective CON-2.A: Work to conserve energy resources in existing and new buildings, utilities, and infrastructure.
CON-2.A.1: Promote efficient use of energy and conservation of
available resources in the design, construction, maintenance, and
operation of public and private facilities, infrastructure, and equipment.
Ongoing and currently being implemented. Examples include the LEED
certified Lions Park Projects, including library. EV Charging Stations now
installed at City Hall.
CON-2.A.2: Consult with regional agencies and utility companies to
pursue energy efficiency goals. Expand renewable energy strategies to
reach zero net energy for both residential and commercial new
construction.
Ongoing. Working with SCE to upgrade existing lights at City facilities to
LED.
CON-2.A.3: Continue to develop partnerships with participating
jurisdictions to promote energy efficiency, energy conservation, and
renewable energy resource development by leveraging the abilities of
local governments to strengthen and reinforce the capacity of energy
efficiency efforts.
Completed the installation of the EV Charging Stations at City Hall.
CON-2.A.4: Encourage new development to take advantage of Costa
Mesa’s optimal climate in the warming and cooling of buildings, including
use of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.
Ongoing encouragement for all new development proposals.
CON-2.A.5: Promote environmentally sustainable development principles
for buildings, master planned communities, neighborhoods, and
infrastructure.
Ongoing and currently being implemented. Examples include the LEED
certified Lions Park Projects, including library. EV Charging Stations now
installed at City Hall.
CON-2.A.6: Encourage construction and building development practices
that reduce resource expenditures throughout the lifecycle of a structure. Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CON-2.A.7: Continue to require all City facilities and services to
incorporate energy and resource conservation standards and practices
and require that new municipal facilities be built within the LEED Gold
standards or equivalent.
Ongoing as development is submitted for review for private development.
The ongoing Lions Park Projects are proposed gold and silver LEED
certified projects. The new library designed to achieve a U.S. Green
Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design
(LEED) rating of Gold and renovation of the existing 8,740 SF Donald
Dungan Library to achieve a USGBC LEED rating of Silver.
CON-2.A.8: Continue City green initiatives in purchases of equipment,
and agreements that favor sustainable products and practices. Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 47
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CON-2.A.9 Encourage waste management programs that promote waste
reduction and recycling to minimize materials sent to landfills. Maintain
robust programs encourage residents and businesses to reduce, reuse,
recycle, and compost.
Currently being implemented and required with all building permits. For
demolition, grading, or building permits involving projects with a valuation
of $10,000 or more, the contractor is required to use a City-Permitted
Waste Hauler(s) to haul any debris or soiled waste from the jobsite.
CON-2.A.10 Support waste management practices that provide recycling
programs. Promote organic recycling, landfill diversion, zero waste goals,
proper hazardous waste collections, composting, and the continuance of
recycling centers.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CON-2.A.11 Continue construction and demolition programs that require
recycling and minimize waste in haul trips. Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Goal CON-3: Improved Water Supply and Quality
Objective CON-3.A: Work towards the protection and conservation of existing and future water resources by recognizing water as a limited resource
that requires conservation.
CON-3.A.1: Continue to consult with local water districts and the Orange
County Water District to ensure reliable, adequate, and high-quality
sources of water supply at a reasonable cost.
Work with OC Flood Control and County for water flow needs in the
wetlands habitat at Fairview Park.
CON-3.A.2: Encourage residents, public facilities, businesses, and
industry to minimize water consumption, especially during drought years.
The City adopted the amendment to Water Efficient Landscape
Guidelines in 2015 that has been in effect for more than 7 years. The
most recent update was adopted in 2018. The City provides public
education materials that promote water-efficient practices and policies.
CON-3.A.3: Restrict use of turf in new construction and landscape
reinstallation that requires high irrigation demands, except for area parks
and schools, and encourage the use of drought-tolerant landscaping.
The City adopted the amendment to Water Efficient Landscape
Guidelines in 2015 that has been in effect for more than 7 years.
Compliance with the guidelines minimizes use of turf for commercial and
residential projects. The City encourages use of drought-tolerant
landscaping for new developments.
CON-3.A.4: Consult with local water districts and the Orange County
Water District to advance water recycling program for new and existing
developments, including the use of treated wastewater to irrigate parks,
golf courses, roadway landscaping, and other intensive irrigation
consumers.
Currently being implemented where applicable, the City Integrates
recycled water into Capital Improvement Projects and development
projects.
CON-3.A.5: Work with public and private property owners to reduce
stormwater runoff in urban areas to protect water quality in storm drainage
channels, the Santa Ana River, and other local water courses that lead to
the Pacific Ocean.
Currently being implemented. Response to incidents involve possible
water quality violations and employ public education and other measures
to control pollutant discharges to the City’s storm drain system.
CON-3.A.6: Continue to develop strategies to promote stormwater
management techniques and storm drain diversion programs that
collectively and naturally filter urban runoff.
Currently being implemented. The City has contributed $600,000 to the
Santa Ana-Delhi watershed dry weather diversion project.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 48
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CON-3.A.7: Continue to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Program (NPDES) by participating in the Countywide
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), which stipulates water quality
requirements for minimizing urban runoff and discharge from new
development and requires the provisions of applicable Best Management
Practices (BMP).
Currently being implemented. Plans are reviewed to project conformance
with development standards for water quality, including implementation of
low-impact development Best Management Practices to the maximum
extent practicable.
CON-3.A.8: Require that all applicable development projects be reviewed
with regards to requirements of both the on-site Water Quality
Management Plan and State requirements for runoff and obtaining a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) permit.
Currently being implemented. Water Quality Management Plans and
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans are reviewed and inspected for
compliance with respect to development projects.
CON-3.A.9: Continue to consult with the Costa Mesa Sanitation District
and the Orange County Sanitation District to modernize wastewater
treatment facilities to avoid overflows of untreated sewage.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Goal CON-4: Improved Air Quality
Objective CON-4.A: Pursue the prevention of the significant deterioration of local and regional air quality.
CON-4.A.1: Support regional policies and efforts that improve air quality
to protect human and environmental health, and minimize disproportionate
impacts on sensitive population groups.
The City Costa Mesa is committed to enhancing and expanding its
sustainability efforts to meet the State of California’s ambitious climate
and energy goals, while simultaneously achieving local objectives such as
reducing air pollution to improve public health, support the local economy
and build resilient infrastructure.
Costa Mesa puts equity at the center. City staff works with diverse
stakeholders to identify system-wide vulnerabilities and explicitly include
and consult frontline communities that are disproportionately vulnerable to
climate impacts.
CON-4.A.2: Encourage businesses, industries and residents to reduce
the impact of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of stationary and
non-stationary pollution sources.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CON-4.A.3: Require that sensitive uses such as schools, childcare
centers, parks and playgrounds, housing, and community gathering places
are protected from adverse impacts of emissions.
Ongoing. Reviewed in conjunction to private childcare and school
developments.
CON-4.A.4: Continue to participate in regional planning efforts with the
Southern California Association of Governments, nearby jurisdictions, and
the South Coast Air Quality Management District to meet or exceed air
quality standards.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CON-4.A.5: Encourage compact development, infill development, and a
mix of uses that are in proximity to transit, pedestrian, and bicycling
infrastructures.
In 2020, 140 units were completed that are infill development or in
proximity to transit stops. In addition, Urban Plans encourage mixed-use
infill developments.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 49
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CON-4.A.6: Enhance bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support
public bus service, pursuant to the Circulation Element’s goals, objectives,
and policies.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CON-4.A.7: Encourage installation of renewable energy devices for
businesses and facilities and strive to reduce community-wide energy
consumption.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CON-4.A.8: Develop long-term, community-wide strategies and programs
that work at the local level to reduce greenhouse gases and Costa Mesa’s
“carbon footprint”.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
NOISE ELEMENT
Goal N-1: Noise Hazards and Conditions
Objective N-1A: Control noise levels within the City for the protection of residential areas, park areas, and other sensitive land uses from excessive
and unhealthful noise.
N-1.1: Enforce the maximum acceptable exterior noise levels for
residential areas at 65 CNEL.
Ongoing discussions with Caltrans. The 405 widening project
incorporates noise attenuation barriers to protect adjacent residential and
other noise-sensitive areas.
N-1.2: Give full consideration to the existing and projected noise
environment when considering alterations to the City's circulation system
and Master Plan of Highways.
Ongoing and reviewed for all projects.
N-1.3: Encourage Caltrans to construct noise attenuation barriers along
I-405, SR-55, and SR-73 where these freeways adjoin residential and
other noise-sensitive areas.
Ongoing discussions with Caltrans. The 405 widening project
incorporates noise attenuation barriers to protect adjacent residential and
other noise-sensitive areas.
N-1.4: Ensure that appropriate site design measures are incorporated
into residential developments, when required by an acoustical study, to
obtain appropriate exterior and interior noise levels.
When necessary, require field testing at the time of project completion to
demonstrate compliance.
Ongoing. Specific sound attenuation for interior and exterior spaces is
incorporated per requirements of the acoustical studies on project basis.
N-1.5: Apply the standards contained in Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations as applicable to the construction of all new dwelling units. Ongoing and reviewed for residential projects.
N-1.6: Discourage sensitive land uses from locating within the 65 CNEL
noise contour of John Wayne Airport. Should it be deemed by the City as
appropriate and/or necessary for a sensitive land use to locate in the 65
CNEL noise contour, ensure that appropriate interior noise levels are met
and that minimal outdoor activities are allowed.
Ongoing and reviewed for projects and land uses proposing to locate near
John Wayne Airport.
N-1.7: Support alternative methods for the reduction of noise impacts at
John Wayne Airport while continuing to maintain safety and existing
limitations on aircraft daily departures.
Ongoing. The City regularly monitors any new development in the John
Wayne Airport operations, such as the recent General Aviation Program,
to ensure that the noise levels are not increased.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 50
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
N-1.8: Monitor the noise levels at OC Fair and Event Center and the
Pacific Amphitheater, and continue to monitor the status of legally binding
noise levels on the OC Fair and the Event Center and the Pacific
Amphitheater.
Ongoing. The City meets quarterly with the Newport-Mesa Unified School
District as part of the City/District Liaison Meeting and the City also sends
a representative to the monthly OC Fair Board meetings.
Goal N-2: Noise and Land Use Compatibility
Objective N-2A: Plan for the reduction in noise impacts on sensitive receptors and land uses.
N-2.1: Require the use of sound walls, berms, interior noise insulation,
double-paned windows, and other noise mitigation measures, as
appropriate, in the design of new residential or other new noise sensitive
land uses that are adjacent to arterials, freeways, or adjacent to industrial
or commercial uses.
Ongoing and reviewed for residential projects.
N-2.2: Require, as a part of the environmental review process, that full
consideration be given to the existing and projected noise environment. Ongoing for all new projects.
N-2.3: Consider alternative noise level standards for mixed-use projects
that take into consideration the interaction of industrial operation noise
impacts and the mixed-use developments planned for the Westside and
SoBeca.
Ongoing for projects utilizing the City’s Urban Plans (19 West Urban Plan,
Mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan, Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban
Plan and SoBeca Urban Plan).
N-2.4: Require that all proposed projects are compatible with adopted
noise/land use compatibility criteria. Ongoing for all new projects.
N-2.5: Enforce applicable interior and exterior noise standards. Ongoing for all new projects.
N-2.6: Allow a higher exterior noise level standard for infill projects in
existing residential areas adjacent to major arterials if it can be shown that
there are no feasible mechanisms to meet the exterior noise levels. The
interior standard of 45 dBA CNEL shall be enforced for any new residential
project.
Ongoing and allowed for applicable projects, if demonstrated that there
are no feasible mechanisms to meet the exterior noise levels.
N-2.7: Encourage effective site planning in mixed-use areas that
provides the optimal distance between source of excessive sound and
residents.
Ongoing and encouraged for applicable projects involving potentially
excessive sounds sources and residences.
N-2.8: Require new mixed-use developments to site loading areas,
parking lots, driveways, trash enclosures, mechanical equipment, and
other noise sources away from the residential portion of the development
and adjacent established residential development.
Ongoing for all new mixed-use developments.
N-2.9: Limit hours and/or require attenuation of
commercial/entertainment operations adjacent to residential and other
noise sensitive uses in order to minimize excessive noise to these
receptors.
Ongoing and evaluated for applicable commercial/entertainment uses and
projects.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 51
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal S-1: Risk Management of Natural and Human-Caused Disasters
Objective S-1A:Work to mitigate and prevent potential adverse consequences of natural and human-caused disasters.
S-1.1: Continue to incorporate geotechnical hazard data into future land
use decision-making, site design, and construction standards. Ongoing and incorporated when applicable.
S-1.2: Enforce standards, review criteria, and ensure that structures on
or adjacent to bluffs are set back sufficiently to preserve the natural
contours and aesthetic value of the bluff line and to provide sufficient
access for fire protection.
Ongoing. Reviewed in detail for each project with the geotechnical report.
S-1.3: Require geologic surveys of all new development located on or
adjacent to bluffs. Ongoing. Reviewed in detail for each project with the geotechnical report.
S-1.4: Encourage retrofitting of structures—particularly older buildings—
to withstand earthquake shaking and landslides consistent with State and
historical building codes.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
S-1.5: Enforce applicable building codes relating to the seismic design of
structures to reduce the potential for loss of life and property damage.
Ongoing.Code amendment proposals continue to be assessed and
developed as it relates to California Building Code updates.
S-1.6: Identify through a study the issue of unreinforced masonry
buildings and soft stories and other structures not meeting earthquake
standards in Costa Mesa. Provide assistance if necessary to unreinforced
masonry building owners once those buildings have been identified.
To be implemented. Additional information will be provided with the 2021
annual review.
S-1.7: Continue to implement the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act, which
requires sites within liquefaction hazard areas to be investigated for
liquefaction susceptibility prior to building construction or human
occupancy.
Ongoing. Seismic standards are reviewed with building permit
applications.
S-1.8: Consider site soils conditions when reviewing projects in areas
subject to liquefaction or slope instability. Ongoing per State guidelines.
S-1.9: Continue to consult with appropriate local, State, and federal
agencies to maintain the most current flood hazard and floodplain
information; use the information as a basis for project review and to guide
development in accordance with federal, State, and local standards.
With the latest improvements in the flood channels reflected in the 2009
Flood maps, there are no residential properties within flood hazard areas.
S-1.10: Regularly review and update Article 10 - Floodway and Floodplain
Districts of the City’s Municipal Code consistent with federal and State
requirements.
Ongoing as information becomes available.
S-1.11: Improve and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure in a
manner that reduces flood hazards.
Improvements and maintenance of storm drainage infrastructure occurs
ongoing and when appropriate.
S-1.12: Continue to develop hazard preparedness plans to prepare for
large storms that could bring flooding hazards and other related issues.
The Police Department’s Office of Emergency Management is currently
developing a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, which will address flood
hazards and related issues specific to Costa Mesa.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 52
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
S-1.13: Actively promote public education, research, and information
dissemination on flooding hazards.
As part of the development of the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, it is
required that the Office of Emergency Management engage and share
information with the public regarding flood and other local hazards.
S-1.14: Minimize flood hazard risks to people, property, and the
environment by addressing potential damage tsunamis and sea level rise.
The Office of Emergency Management is currently developing a Local
Hazard Mitigation Plan, which will address tsunami and sea level rise
issues specific to Costa Mesa.
S-1.15: Consult with regional agencies and study strategies that employ
engineering defensive methods along the Santa Ana River that limit
potential flooding hazards from sea level rise.
The Office of Emergency Management is currently developing a Local
Hazard Mitigation Plan, which will address tsunami and sea level rise
issues specific to Costa Mesa.
S-1.16: Develop emergency response, early warning notification, and
evacuation plans for areas that are within dam inundation areas, where
feasible.
Emergency preparedness, planning, response and recovery efforts are
ongoing through the Office of Emergency Management under the
direction of the Emergency Services Administrator. Additionally, the
Emergency Services Administrator is currently participating in planning
multiple agencies, including the Orange County Operational Area,
regarding dam inundation on a regional level. The City currently
participates in the countywide mass notification system Alert OC, which
provides mass notifications to the citizens and businesses of Costa Mesa.
In addition, the City has received authorization from the Department of
Homeland Security to disseminate Integrated Public Alert and Warning
(IPAWS) Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA)
S-1.17: Utilize the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP)
as a planning resource for evaluation of land use compatibility and land
use intensity in areas affected by airport operations. In particular, future
land use decisions within the Safety/Runway Protection Zone will be
evaluated in light of the risk to life and property associated with aircraft
operations.
Ongoing utilization of the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan
(AELUP) as a planning resource for evaluation of land use compatibility
and land use intensity for applicable projects.
S-1.18: Comply with Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) and the John
Wayne AELUP requirements relative to Objects Affecting Navigable
Airspace.
Ongoing compliance with FAR and AELUP as it relates to Objects
Affecting Navigable Airspace.
S-1.19: Use the Federal Aviation Regulations as a guideline to establish
the ultimate height of structures as defined in FAR Part 77.
Ongoing use of the Federal Aviation Regulations as a guideline for the
ultimate height of structures.
S-1.20: Minimize hazards to aeronautical operations by ensuring land
uses do not emit excessive glare, light, steam, smoke, dust, or electronic
interference in compliance with FAR regulations and the John Wayne
AELUP.
Ongoing review to ensure minimized impacts to aeronautical operations.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 53
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Goal S-2: High Level of Police and Fire Services and Emergency Preparedness
Objective S-2A:Plan, promote, and demonstrate a readiness to respond and reduce threats to life and property through traditional and
innovative emergency services and programs.
S-2.1: Promote crime prevention strategies and provide a high level of
response to incidents.
The Police Department continuously evaluates this General Pan policy
and efforts towards it are ongoing.
S-2.2: Emphasize and prioritize crime prevention strategies, such as
pedestrian-scale lighting in targeted areas.
The Police Department continuously evaluates this General Pan policy
and efforts towards it are ongoing.
S-2.3: Timely response to incidents and monitoring areas with high crime
rates should be part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce crime in the
community.
The Police Department continuously evaluates this General Pan policy
and efforts towards it are ongoing.
S-2.4: Provide a high level of police and fire service in the community.
Secure adequate facilities, equipment, and personnel for police and fire.
The Police Department and Office of Emergency Management continue to
identify areas for improvement regarding facility composition, size,
security, equipment, and overall ability to support current and future public
safety requirements. CMFR is budgeting for the replacement of
emergency vehicles and apparatus based on maintenance costs
exceeding their worth, failure of major components, unsupported
equipment, and compliance with NFPA 1901, the standard for automotive
fire apparatus. CMFR has submitted CIP budget requests for the
replacement of the two facilities that are over 40-years old (Station 2 was
built in 1966 and Station 4 was built in 1967) and the facilities that do not
comply with separate facilities for female members of the department.
CMFR fire station facilities requested upgrades to the HVAC systems to
reduce exposure to COVID-19.
S-2.5: Consult with neighboring jurisdictions and partner agencies to
respond appropriately to emergencies and incidents in all parts of the City.
The Police Department and Office of Emergency Management continue to
work with local, regional, state, and federal partners to coordinate
information sharing, intelligence dissemination, and emergency response.
Coordinating organizations include law enforcement, public health,
communications, utilities, education, and business.CFMR participates in
a county-wide Automatic Aid response program for emergency incidents.
CMFR hosts a Community Emergency Response Team Program and
volunteer Mutual Aid agreement with neighboring jurisdictions for the
response to emergency incidents.
S-2.6: Require that water supply systems for development are adequate
to combat structural fires in terms of location and minimum required fire-
flow pressures.
Community Risk Reduction staff continued to ensure adequate water
supply through participation in the development and plan review
processes.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 54
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
S-2.7: Require development to contribute its fair share toward funding
the provision of appropriate fire and emergency medical services as
determined necessary to adequately serve the project.
Projects are assessed in the development review process for potential
impacts that would require adjustments to fire and emergency medical
response. Projects in areas designated to the fire protection system
development impact fees had them assessed. Fire Development Impact
and Cost Recovery fees continue to be assessed.
S-2.8: Regularly update regulations that will protect the community from
fire hazards.
Community Risk Reduction staff continued to monitor fire activity. Code
amendment proposals continue to be assessed and developed in
anticipation of the 2022 California Fire Code adoption.
S-2.9: Emphasize prevention and awareness of fire safety guidelines to
minimize risk and potential damage to life, property, and the environment.
In areas designated by the Costa Mesa Fire Department as having a high
fire hazard, ensure adequate fire equipment, personnel, firebreaks,
facilities, water, and access for a quick and efficient response in any area.
Fire Prevention and Community Risk Reduction plan submittal guidelines
were revised. Ten CMFR guidelines and checklists were updated during
2020.
S-2.10: Maintain staff and facilities that will continue to support a
coordinated and effective response to emergencies and natural disasters
throughout the City.
The Office of Emergency Management is leading training efforts for city
staff to support planning, response and recovery efforts due to
emergencies or natural disasters on a local and regional level. The City
also maintains an Emergency Operations Center, which is currently being
assessed for upgrades to support the response to emergencies and
disasters.New fire station facilities will be built to American Society of
Civil Engineers (ASCE) Category IV Critical Facilities standards.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 55
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
S-2.11: Consult with neighboring jurisdictions, local employers, and
industries to ensure that emergency preparedness and disaster response
programs equitably serve all parts of the City.
The Office of Emergency Management continues to improve upon the
City’s emergency preparedness through active engagement in all aspects
and the continuous planning and preparedness to respond to an event on
a local and/or regional level. CMFR provided preparedness and fire safety
information quarterly through business liaisons and hosted 1 Business
Preparedness Academy in 2020. CMFR collaborated with NMUSD to
provide preparedness and safety resources, educational materials, and
outreach in all media formats to schools in 2020. CMFR hosted a pilot
Church Preparedness Academy in 2020. Preparedness materials and
educational resources were available and shared via the city website and
social media. CMFR continues to develop and support preparedness for
the community, including hosting Community Emergency Response Team
(CERT) training annually (1 course in 2020) and hosting seven virtual
training meetings with current active volunteers. CMFR continued to
develop staff and outreach efforts to bring personal preparedness through
the LISTOS (Ready in Spanish) program to the community. Resources in
Spanish, Vietnamese, and English were shared with 1800 community
members utilizing the California for All Emergency Preparedness Public
Outreach and Education Campaign materials. CMFR continues to update
preparedness and safety information on the city’s website and through
social media.
S-2.12: Continue to maintain adequate police and fire staffing, facilities,
equipment, and maintenance sufficient to protect the community.
The Police Department continues to hire sworn and civilian staff to fill
vacancies within the Department. Current staffing is prioritized to provide
quality levels of service to the community, along with equipment and
facilities that promote top-tier law enforcement within Orange County.
CMFR hired two new firefighters in 2020. Promotions and succession
planning activities were completed at all ranks of the Fire Department.
S-2.13: Continue to consult with the County of Orange in the
implementation of the Orange County Hazardous Waste Management
Plan.
Staff participated in county-wide Orange County Environmental Health
Department meetings.
S-2.14: Ensure that appropriate in-depth environmental analysis is
conducted for any proposed hazardous waste materials treatment,
transfer, and/or disposal facility.
Staff reviewed hazardous materials disclosure submittals for compliance
with the California Fire Code and CalEPA regulations.
S-2.15: Continue to consult with the County of Orange to identify and
inventory all users of hazardous materials and all hazardous waste
generators, and prepare clean-up action plans for identified disposal sites.
CMFR staff conducted joint inspections of undocumented facilities with
the Orange County Environmental Health Department to ensure
compliance.
S-2.16: Require the safe production, transportation, handling, use, and
disposal of hazardous materials that may cause air, water, or soil
contamination.
Taskforce inspections and enforcement actions were completed on
facilities suspected of illegal use, production, transportation, and disposal.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 56
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
S-2.17: Encourage best practices in hazardous waste management, and
ensure consistency with City, County, and federal guidelines, standards,
and requirements.
CMFR conducted plan reviews and inspections of facilities that use and
store hazardous materials through the CFC Operational Permit Program.
S-2.18: Consult with federal, State, and local agencies and law
enforcement to prevent the illegal transportation and disposal of
hazardous waste.
Taskforce inspections and enforcement actions were completed on
facilities suspected of illegal use, production, transportation, and disposal.
COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT
Goal CD-1: Vehicular and Pedestrian Corridors
Objective CD-1A: Contribute to City beautification by enhancing the visual environment of Costa Mesa’s vehicular and pedestrian paths and
corridors.
CD-1.1 Implement the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median
Development Guidelines in all new streetscape corridor and parkway
projects. Coordinate with new development adjacent to public rights-of-
ways to integrate landscape features and design elements consistent with
the streetscape standards and recommendations.
Ongoing and currently being implemented. New and consistent
landscape palette is required for all new developments along Harbor
Blvd., south of the I-405 Freeway.
CD-1.2 Coordinate street furniture elements (benches, bus shelters,
newspaper racks, trash receptacles, kiosks, etc.) whenever possible.
Develop design standards and guidelines for the street furniture within and
adjacent to public rights-of-way to complement the specific
recommendations provided for streets in the City of Costa Mesa
Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CD-1.3 Promote treatments for walls and fences and utility cabinets along
public rights-of-way that contribute to an attractive street and sidewalk
environment. Require that new walls and fences complement the style and
character of the local district and adjacent buildings. Newly constructed or
reconstructed walls and fences adjacent to sidewalks and roadways
should incorporate architectural treatments such as pilasters, masonry, or
wrought iron, and should integrate tiered plantings to soften their
appearance.
Ongoing and currently being implemented. All new residential
development projects are subject to a standard condition that requires
decorative walls along the perimeter of the development.
CD-1.4 Promote a consistent landscape character along City streets to
reinforce the unique qualities of each corridor and district, including the
development of landscaped medians. Support implementation of the
recommended street tree palette for each City street, as identified in the
City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 57
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CD-1.5 Encourage electric and communication lines to be placed
underground and electrical substations and telephone facilities to be
screened to minimize visual impacts from sidewalks, streets, and adjacent
properties. Support utility undergrounding through conditions of project
approval, preparation of undergrounding plans, and the formation of
assessment districts.
Ongoing and currently being implemented. City is in the process of
creating an underground utility district along Adams Avenue between
Mesa Verde Dr. East to Albatross Dr.
Objective CD-1B: Encourage clear connections between districts within the City.
CD-1.6 Promote linkages between separate districts using bike trails,
pedestrian paths, common medians or parkway landscaping, and other
location-appropriate physical improvements. Through conditions of
approval, public improvement projects, and other measures, support
development of new connections and the enhancement of existing
connections between districts.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Goal CD-2: Cohesive and Identifiable Districts
Objective CD-2A: Encourage future development and redevelopment to reinforce district scale, identity, and urban form.
CD-2.1 Consider urban design guidelines for each identified district in
Costa Mesa that recognizes, maintains, and enhances the character and
identity of each district; integrate existing specific plans’ policies and
design guidelines as applicable.
Ongoing, to be developed.
CD-2.2 Support and seek land uses and development that correspond or
enrich our existing districts. Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Goal CD-3: High Quality and Visually Interesting Nodes
Objective CD-3A: Create a sense of arrival to Costa Mesa, and develop prominent community focal points at key nodes within the City.
CD-3.1 Introduce entry monument signs at key gateway locations, as
identified in Figure CD-4. Utilize the standard design specifications for
entry signs included in the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median
Development Guidelines.
Ongoing and currently being implemented. CIP projects are being
reviewed with monument sign installation in mind.
CD-3.2 Reinforce a sense of arrival into the City by promoting
architecturally significant development and significant landscape plantings
at key nodes. Undertake a visioning process to develop specific design
guidelines that articulate the desired character for each node within Costa
Mesa.
Ongoing. New and consistent landscape palette is required for new
development along Harbor Boulevard and major corridors.
CD-3.3 Design and development of entry and internal wayfinding signage
to be located throughout the City in areas that correspond to the existing
nodes and districts.
Ongoing. The City also completed the design phase of the Citywide Way
Finding Signage Program.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 58
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Goal CD-4: Identifiable and Protected City Landmarks.
Objective CD-4A: Promote the maintenance, use, and improvement of landmarks to enhance the visual image and identity of Costa Mesa.
CD-4.1 Support efforts to introduce new monuments and landmarks, and
preserve, maintain, and improve the condition of Costa Mesa landmarks.
Ongoing. Lions Park construction calls for the new Library landmarks,
such as the Panther Jet at Lions Park, which are being preserved. Also,
Costa Mesa Historical Society is active in preserving City landmarks, such
as the Diego Sepulveda Adobe house.
Goal CD-5: Edges
Objective CD-5A: Develop and implement programs that preserve and enhance City edges.
CD-5.1 Preserve and optimize natural views and open spaces in Costa
Mesa. Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CD-5.2 Control the visual impacts of new development on natural views of
the coast and the wetlands. Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CD-5.3 Develop open space corridors and trails along the edges of Costa
Mesa where feasible and connect these trails to existing and potential
future trails throughout the City.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CD-5.4 Continue to preserve natural open space, including restoration of
the natural areas of Talbert Regional Park.
Promotion of Talbert Park preservation events via City resources, ongoing
communications with OC Parks staff, and OCRP.
CD-5.5 Continue protection of Fairview Park as an open space and
recreation area. Continued and ongoing.
CD-5.6 Continue to work with Caltrans to improve the design quality of
freeway edges. Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Goal CD-6: Image
Objective CD-6A: Establish development policies and design guidelines that create an aesthetically pleasing and functional environment.
CD-6.1 Encourage the inclusion of public art and attractive, functional
architecture into new development that will have the effect of promoting
Costa Mesa as the “City of the Arts”.
Arts and Culture Master Plan approved by the Parks, Arts, and
Community (PACS) Commission, and additional efforts are underway with
potential for recommendations to formalize policies for artistic inclusion in
development design. Cultural Arts Committee ongoing projects include
gallery spaces, public art installations and sculpture donations.
CD-6.2 Encourage the use of creative and well-designed signs that
establish a distinctive image for the City. Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CD-6.3 Continue to work with Code Enforcement to ensure continued
maintenance of properties and compliance with adopted development
standards.
Ongoing through the Community Improvement Division.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 59
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Goal CD-7: Quality Residential
Objective CD-7A:Encourage excellence in architectural design.
CD-7.1 Ensure that new and remodeled structures are designed in
architectural styles that reflect the City’s eclectic quality, yet are
compatible in scale and character with existing buildings and the natural
surroundings within residential neighborhoods. Continue to update and
maintain the Costa Mesa Residential Guidelines.
Ongoing and reviewed for residential projects.
CD-7.2 Preserve the character and scale of Costa Mesa’s established
residential neighborhoods where possible; when new residential
development is proposed, encourage that the new structures are
consistent with the prevailing character of existing development in the
immediate vicinity, and that new development does not have a substantial
adverse impact on adjacent areas.
Ongoing and reviewed for residential projects.
Objective CD-7B: Encourage the use of native plant palettes in the creation of landscaping plans used to establish a sense of place in neighborhood
identification efforts.
CD-7.3 Ensure that California native plants are used to support the local
ecology and save water. Develop landscaping guidelines that reflect the
local community.
Ongoing. The City continues to adhere to the revisions of the January
2016 Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines to reflect Governor Brown’s
April 1, 2015 Drought Executive Order (B-19-25) for public and private
projects.
Goal CD-8: Quality Commercial Development
Objective CD-8A: Encourage a high level of architectural and site design quality.
CD-8.1 Require that new and remodeled commercial development be
designed to reflect architectural diversity, yet be compatible with the scale
and character of the district.
Ongoing and reviewed for commercial development projects.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 60
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CD-8.2 Use distinctive commercial architectural styles to reinforce a
positive sense of place. Commercial architectural design elements and
materials must be of high quality and style as well as suitable for long-term
maintenance. Consistent architectural design should be considered in
choosing materials, finishes, decorative details, color, accent features and
include the following elements and materials appropriate for their context
(see Table CD-3: Elements and Materials):
Table CD-3: Elements and Materials
Design Elements Design Materials
Simple, multi-planed pitched roofs
Open rafters/tails with large overhangs
Appearance of “thick” walls
Courtyards, arcades, and intimate
spaces
Tile details
Deep-set window and door openings
Offset wall planes
Fountains and other unique details
Building masses with the incorporation
of one and two story architecture
Sequencing of enclosed space/arches
Stucco, smooth, sand or light lace
finish
Wood, as an exposed structural
material
Clay or concrete roof tiles
Native fieldstone
Wood window casements
Wood, as an accent material
Brick, as an accent material
Wrought iron (rust proof; anodized
aluminum)
Tile, as an accent material
Slumpstone garden walls
Ongoing for all new commercial projects.
CD-8.3 Encourage the use of entrance patios, courtyards, plazas,
arcades, fountains, porches, tower elements, covered walks, and other
features in commercial areas. Promote pedestrian amenities.
Ongoing for all new commercial projects.
CD-8.4 Ensure that common areas, walkways, driveways, and parking
spaces be landscaped consistent with landscaping standards contained in
the Planning, Zoning, and Development Code. Utilize landscaping to
provide project amenities for new and remodeled commercial uses, and to
screen parking and equipment areas. Landscaped areas generally should
incorporate planting utilizing a three-tiered system: 1) grasses and ground
covers, 2) shrubs and vines, and 3) trees.
Ongoing for all new and rehabilitation projects.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 61
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CD-8.5 Ensure that site access, parking, and circulation for commercial
uses are designed in a logical, safe manner. Parking should not dominate
the site in areas adjacent to street, and should be well landscaped with a
clear hierarchy of circulation. Wherever possible, parking lots should be
divided into a series of connected smaller lots utilizing walkways and
raised landscape strips. Parking lots should also include landscaping that
accents the importance of driveways from the street, frames the major
circulation aisles, and highlights pedestrian pathways.
Ongoing for all new and rehabilitation projects.
CD-8.6 Require that areas for outside equipment, trash receptacles,
storage, and loading areas be located in the least conspicuous part of the
site. Utility and mechanical equipment (e.g. electric and gas meters,
electrical panels, and junction boxes) should be concealed from view from
public streets, neighboring properties, and nearby higher buildings. Trash
enclosures should be architecturally compatible with the project.
Landscaping should be incorporated into the design of trash enclosures to
deter graffiti.
Ongoing and required for all new and rehabilitation projects.
CD-8.7 Encourage decorative paving treatments to be incorporated
throughout commercial developments, including driveway entries,
pedestrian walkways, plazas, and other areas. The design, materials, and
colors of decorative paving treatments (e.g., stamped concrete, stone,
brick or granite pavers, exposed aggregate, or colored concrete) should
complement the architectural style of the primary buildings and make a
positive contribution to the aesthetic and function of the site.
Ongoing for all new commercial projects.
CD-8.8 Require that exterior lighting on commercial properties be
consistent with the architectural style of the commercial building. On each
commercial site, all lighting fixtures should be from the same family of
fixtures with respect to design, materials, color, fixture, and color of light.
Lighting sources should be shielded, diffused or indirect to avoid spillover
on adjacent properties, nighttime sky light pollution, and glare to
pedestrians and motorists. To minimize the total number of freestanding
light standards, wall-mounted and pathway lights should be utilized to the
greatest extent possible.
Ongoing for all new commercial projects. All commercial projects are
subject to submittal of a lighting and photometric plan to ensure
consistency in design, adequate lighting for safety and minimize light spill-
over onto adjacent properties.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 62
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Objective CD-8B: Preserve the scale and character of established neighborhoods near commercial uses.
CD-8.9 Ensure that new commercial development utilize site planning and
design features that optimize compatibility with adjacent residential
neighborhoods. The following guidance should be considered:
When adjacent residential and nonresidential uses can mutually benefit
from connection, appropriate linkages (e.g., walkways, common landscape
areas, and building orientation) are encouraged. Successful interaction
between commercial and residential uses may be achieved through
adequate setbacks, landscape buffers, screening, decorative masonry
walls, berms, building orientation, and limitations of commercial activities.
Loading areas, access and circulation driveways, trash and storage areas,
and rooftop equipment should be located as far as possible from adjacent
residences.
Building orientation and landscaping of commercial buildings should
minimize direct lines of sight into adjacent residential private open space.
Ongoing for all new commercial projects.
Goal CD-9: Mixed Use
Objective CD-9A: Design mixed use development projects to achieve a high quality character.
CD-9.1 Require that mixed-use development projects be designed to
mitigate potential conflicts between uses. Consider noise, lighting, and
security.
Ongoing for all mixed-use development projects.
CD-9.2 Provide adequate parking, open space and recreational facilities
to serve residents in mixed-use development projects. Design parking and
other areas to acknowledge different users (residents versus shoppers)
and to be compatible with the architectural character of the building(s).
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Objective CD-9B: Provide for the development of projects that integrate housing with commercial uses and other compatible uses.
CD-9.3 Encourage mixed-use development along the east side of
Newport Boulevard between Mesa Drive and Walnut Street. Establish
incentives for the development of projects in planned development zones
that integrate housing with retail and office uses.
Ongoing and to be updated as part of the Housing Element Update
process.
CD-9.4 Encourage the development of mixed-use urban villages along
specified areas of West 17th Street, West 19th Street, and Superior
Avenue that integrates residential with office, retail, business services,
personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community
amenities in a single building (vertical mixed-use development) or in
proximity on the same site (horizontal mixed-use development).
Ongoing. 19 West Urban Plan, Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban
Plan, Mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan allow for mixed used development
along the main commercial corridors.
CD-9.5 Promote new types of urban housing that could be target-
marketed to people seeking alternative housing choices in proximity to a
major commercial area.
Ongoing and to be updated as part of the Housing Element Update
process.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 63
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CD-9.6 Support efforts to mix compatible uses and activities. Encourage
the siting of community-oriented services, businesses, and amenities in
and near mixed-use neighborhoods, including schools, libraries, open
space, and parks.
Ongoing. The City continues construction on the new Library/Lion’s
Park/new Community Center.
Goal CD-10: Industrial and Business Parks
Objective CD-10A: Require that industrial and business park projects meet high-quality design standards.
CD-10.1 Require that industrial projects be designed to convey
visual interest and a positive image. Architectural qualities and design
elements encouraged for industrial uses are:
Building modulation indentations and architectural details
Building entry accentuation
Screening of equipment and storage areas
Landscaping to soften building exteriors and to serve as a buffer
between uses
Ongoing for all new industrial projects.
CD-10.2 Encourage that the design of industrial buildings considers
the visual and physical relationship to adjacent uses. An industrial
structure which dominates its surrounding environment by its relative size
shall generally be discouraged.
Ongoing and reviewed for all industrial projects.
CD-10.3 Encourage adaptive reuse of existing industrial structures
which results in rehabilitated buildings with distinctive and attractive
architecture.
Ongoing. Staff continues to encourage adaptive reuse of existing
industrial structures.
CD-10.4 Promote the use of materials and colors that produce
diversity and visual interest in industrial buildings. The use of various
siding materials (i.e., masonry, concrete texturing, cement, or plaster) can
produce effects of texture and relief that provide architectural interest.
Ongoing for all new industrial projects.
CD-10.5 Require that landscaping be used to define areas such as
entrances to industrial buildings and parking lots; define the edges of
developments; provide transition between neighboring properties; and
provide screening for outdoor storage, loading, and equipment areas.
Landscaping should be in scale with adjacent buildings and be of an
appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended purpose.
Ongoing and required for all new industrial projects.
CD-10.6 Require that the design of lighting fixtures and their
structural support be of a scale and architectural design compatible with
on-site industrial buildings. Large areas should be illuminated to minimize
the visual impact and amount of spillover light onto surrounding projects.
Ongoing and required for all industrial projects. Standard conditions of
approval for industrial projects ensure minimal visual impacts and minimal
light spillover onto surrounding properties.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 64
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
Objective CD-10B: Ensure that the development of industrial projects are positive additions to the City’s community setting and do not result in
adverse impacts with adjacent uses.
CD-10.7 Require industrial projects to incorporate landscape
setbacks, screening walls, and/or other elements that mitigate negative
impacts with adjacent uses.
Ongoing and required for all industrial projects.
CD-10.8 Protect transitional areas between industrial and other
uses.
Ongoing protection of transitional areas which separate industrial uses
from other uses.
CD-10.9 Storage yards, parking areas, and service areas should
be screened from public view. Ongoing and required for these uses.
Goal CD-11: Attractive Signs that Reflect Costa Mesa
Objective CD-11A: Facilitate the installation of signs that contribute to a positive image of the public realm.
CD-11.1 Encourage homeowners' associations and neighborhoods
to maintain housing tract entrance signs in an attractive condition, and
encourage the placement of such signs at the entrance of major
developments which do not have such identification.
Ongoing and encouraged for large residential projects and major
developments.
CD-11.2 Encourage the use of common design elements in signs
for commercial and industrial centers through the development of planned
sign programs to improve center identity by publicizing the benefits of such
programs to developers and local business operators.
Ongoing and encouraged for all planned signing program applications.
CD-11.3 Encourage citywide sign design guidelines that promote
creativity and flexibility while upholding design quality. Design guidelines
could include the design and placement of business signs, public street
graphics, street signs, locational and directional signs, traffic signs, etc.
Ongoing. In certain zoning districts, Planned Signing Programs are
required to ensure consistency in design, size and location of signs.
CD-11.4 Introduce distinctive entry signage within the Costa Mesa
Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines which effectively
announces arrival to unique districts and neighborhoods.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
CD-11.5 Develop and design signage that helps with way-finding
throughout the City so visitors and residents can easily access destination
locations and identify landmarks.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Goal CD-12: Public Safety through Design
Objective CD-12A: Incorporate public safety considerations into community design.
CD-12.1 Decrease the opportunity for criminal activity by
addressing high-risk circumstances (e.g., dark alleys, enclosed stairwells,
and dark entrances). Involve the Police and Fire Departments in reviewing
and making design recommendations during the project review process.
Ongoing and reviewed for all new projects.
CD-12.2 Continue to implement and refine development standards
and/or guidelines based on Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design (CPTED) for new development and redevelopment with emphasis
on site and building design to minimize vulnerability to criminal activity.
Ongoing and implemented when applicable.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 65
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
CD-12.3 Continue to provide CPTED training to City staff and local
planning and design professionals to optimize public safety through
community design.
Ongoing as funding is available.
OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ELEMENT
Goal OSR-1: Balanced and Accessible System of Parks and Open Spaces
Objective OSR-1A: Maintain and preserve existing parks, and strive to provide additional parks, public spaces, and recreation facilities that meet the
community’s evolving needs.
OSR-1.1: Maintain a system of Neighborhood and Community Parks that
provide a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities
throughout the City.
Ongoing regular maintenance and oversite of all community parks through
the Public Services and Parks and Community Services Departments.
New active recreational opportunities arise through recreation class
offerings and youth sports offerings. Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Master Plan to be adopted by City Council – tentative anticipated adoption
in 2021.
OSR-1.2: Provide parks and recreation facilities appropriate for the
individual neighborhoods in which they are located and reflective of the
needs and interests of the population they serve.
Continue to explore additional park and facility opportunities and apply for
grant funds become available.
OSR-1.3: Pursue the acquisition and development of pocket and
neighborhood parks within park-deficient areas, as identified in Figure
OSR-3: Planning Areas and Underserved Park Areas.
Implementing recommendations from Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Master Plan.
OSR-1.4: Prioritize the acquisition of land for parks in underserved
neighborhoods.
Ongoing as is highlighted in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Master Plan – expected adoption by City Council in 2021.
OSR-1.5: Maximize public space by requiring plazas and public gathering
spaces in private developments that can serve multiple uses, including
recreation and social needs.
Ongoing. The One Metro West project, currently under review, is
proposing a 1.5-acre open space to be available to the general public via
a public access easement.
OSR-1.6: Provide maximum visibility and accessibility for future public
parks by locating facilities in close proximity to public streets.
Ongoing. Lions Park Campus / Phase 1 Project located adjacent to four
public streets.
OSR-1.7: Adjust and update development fee programs to accumulate
funds for the acquisition and improvement of parks and recreation facilities
commensurate with identified need and population growth.
Ongoing. The park impact fees were last updated in 2015 to include
apartment projects. Fee programs continue to be assessed and
adjusted/updated as needed.
OSR-1.8: Require that parks and recreation facilities reflect new trends
and population changes, and are developed with facilities appropriate to
all ages, including athletic fields, active play areas, passive open space,
tot lots, and picnic areas.
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan expected to be
approved/adopted in 2021. Lions Park play area upgrade to include new
amenities. Lions Park event lawn space opened in spring 2019.
OSR-1.9: Conduct a sports facility study to review current outdoor facility
locations and resources and a demographic study for future facility
requirements as they relate to planned growth within the City.
Updated Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan provides this.
Expected to go before City Council in 2021.
OSR-1.10: Pursue additional community garden lots and spaces to meet
demand and need by the community.
Added plots at Del Mar Community Gardens and are meeting with a local
group on garden programming.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 66
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
OSR-1.11: Perform regular maintenance of facilities to ensure proper
working order of all recreation facilities and equipment.
Ongoing maintenance of recreation facilities and equipment occurs to
ensure facilities remain in proper working order.
OSR-1.12: Retrofit parks and recreation facilities to provide disability
access as required by law.
Ongoing upgrades to parks and recreation facilities occur to ensure
compliance with disabled access, as required by law.
OSR-1.13: Design and reform parks to reflect the latest recreational
features that respond to demographic changes and community needs.
Ongoing - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan expected to
be approved/adopted in 2021/2022.
OSR-1.14: Consult with law enforcement agencies, surrounding cities,
community policing groups, and OC Parks to create a safe and healthy
environment at Talbert Regional Park, Fairview Park, and along the Santa
Ana River.
Regular collaboration between Park Ranger staff in the Police
Department, maintenance staff in the Public Services Department and
Field ambassador staff and the Fairview Park Administrator in the Parks
and Community Services Department. Interagency meeting with the
Homeless Task Force and other City departments.
OSR-1.15: Continue to pursue opportunities to create joint-use
community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as
private schools, faith-based groups, service clubs, and hospitals.
Current agreement with Lighthouse Church for temporary shelter
services, and faith-based groups to assist with outreach.
OSR-1.16: Continue to coordinate with the Newport-Mesa Unified School
District to supplement City park facilities through joint-use agreements. Joint-use agreements are ongoing.
OSR-1.17: Consult with Orange County Fairgrounds in implementing OC
Fair & Event Center Master Plan.
Ongoing. The City’s representative to the monthly OC Fair Board
meetings.
OSR-1.18: Provide a minimum of 4.26 acres of parkland per 1,000
residents.
Continue to explore additional park and facility opportunities and apply for
grant funds become available.
OSR-1.19: Update the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
every 10 years, as feasible.
Update approved by the PACS Commission. To be considered by
Council for adoption in 2021.
OSR-1.20: Enhance pedestrian, bicycle, and transit linkages to meet the
needs of residents and to provide better access to parks, recreation, and
public spaces.
Ongoing and currently being implemented.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 67
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
OSR-1.21: Provide opportunities for public access to all open space
areas, except where sensitive resources may be threatened or damaged,
public health and safety may be compromised, or access would interfere
with the managed production of resources.
Properly delineate sensitive and/or unsafe habitats/areas of open space
parks, including permanent or temporary fencing as well as appropriate
signage.
GOAL OSR-2: Community Services Programs Meeting Community Needs
Objective OSR-2A: Provide activities, classes, and a variety of programs to meet the year-round recreational needs of all residents: children, adult,
seniors, and persons with special needs.
OSR-2.1: Provide high-quality community services programs that are
flexible and responsive to the community’s changing needs.
1.5K classes/programs are offered annually at a low to no cost. With the
onset the COVID-19 pandemic, transitioned to provide virtual content and
classes through the Virtual Community Center in addition to special
events, such as the virtual Scarecrow Contest, Holiday Door Decoration,
Drive-In Movies, etc.
OSR-2.2: Plan and conduct citywide special events that bring residents
together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic
development.
Annual calendar of special events is administered annually by staff. With
the onset the COVID-19 pandemic, transitioned to provided virtual events
and activities that allow for social distancing.
OSR-2.3: Continue to consult with nonprofit sports organizations and
recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational
programs that complement and supplement those offered by the City.
Attend monthly CM Youth Sports Council meetings.
OSR-2.4: Update existing facilities for senior citizens, youth, adults, and
overall community use.
Regular building modifications and CIP projects have taken place at the
Balearic Community Center, the Downtown Recreation Center, the
Downtown Aquatics Center and the Costa Mesa Senior Center.
OSR-2.5: Monitor and research the ever-changing community services
needs of the community, and develop action plans to address those needs
through partnerships with service agencies.
Utilizing surveys to solicit feedback on programs and services.
OSR-2.6: Continue to provide rental opportunities at community facilities
and parks for residents, nonprofit groups, and businesses to meet their
recreational and professional needs.
Ongoing. To be increased when conditions allow the new NHCC and the
DD Library Adams room become available for rent when State guidelines
allow gatherings.
OSR-2.7: Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform
residents of all available community services programs, and obtain input
from the community regarding program and service needs.
Ongoing. Outreach will resume at a commensurate rate as recreation
programming resumes. This includes: quarterly surveys, mailing the
quarterly Recreation Guide to 45K+ rooftops, in addition to the publishing
of the Senior Center Monthly News Letter.
OSR-2.8: Encourage resident input and utilize demographic data,
partnerships, volunteers, and existing resources to identify the needs of
community.
Coordinate with multiple volunteer committees (Cultural Arts, Historical
Preservation, Fairview Park, Animal Services, Youth Sports); the Costa
Mesa Foundation and the Network for Homeless Solutions.
OSR-2.9: Identify innovative funding and development opportunities to
support and sustain a responsive community services network.
Prop 68, HOAG Grant, NRPA Grant, CDBG Funding, County Funding for
homeless services.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 68
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
OSR-2.10: Continue and expand the development of community
partnerships to offer both standard and innovative services to meet
residents’ needs.
Solicit further community sponsors and partners. Build upon established
relationship with NMUSD, City of Newport Beach, SOY, Segerstrom
Center for the Arts, etc.
OSR-2.11: Develop and implement community services programs and
activities that meet the needs of specialized populations through the
development of community partnerships.
Partner with SeniorServ, Meals on Wheels, Second Harvest Food Bank,
Alzheimer’s OC, Special Olympics, Regional Center of OC, and SCFTA
Inclusion programs.
OSR-2.12: Provide support for volunteer groups that conduct special
activities open to the entire community.
Resume reservations for public facilities for community use both indoors
and outdoors (parks) as state and local COVID-19 guidance permits.
GOAL OSR-3: Conserved Open Space
Objective OSR-3A: Preserve the City’s open space lands and provide additional community and neighborhood parkland in underserved areas.
OSR-3.1: Preserve open space areas along The Santa Ana River, large
open space parks, and along the mesa formations to protect natural
habitat and to maintain the integrity of the natural environment.
Ongoing. Staff is continually working with its legislative and municipal
partners in furthering the natural development and preservation of all
open space areas for the betterment of the City and also the surrounding
community.
OSR-3.2: Encourage the preservation of coastal views from City and
County parkland and public streets within Costa Mesa.
Ongoing. Staff will strive in pre-planning to preserve the coastal views
from City streets and parkland areas (where they exist).
OSR-3.3: Identify current open space areas for protection, management,
and potential enhancement to maintain and, if possible, increase its value
as wildlife habitat.
Ongoing, with increased attention begin given to Canyon Park.
OSR-3.4: Encourage the long-term maintenance and management of
open space lands through open space easements, development rights
transfers or acquisition, zoning regulations, and other incentives.
Currently evaluating all development projects for park space
opportunities.
OSR-3.5: Encourage the greening and beautifying of the Santa Ana
River.
Ongoing. Staff will engage with its partners, such as the state, county,
and local authorities that promote, enhance, and preserve the greening
and beautifying of the Santa Ana River.
OSR-3.6: Encourage opportunities for recreation, history, education,
interpretive materials, and art associated with the Santa Ana River open
spaces.
Monthly/quarterly educational programs offered for low/no cost related to
nature programs, including Native American/Adobe history.
OSR-3.7: Promote water quality strategies to improve water quality along
the Santa Ana River.
Ongoing preservation and restoration of habitat areas within Fairview
Park and Canyon Park to improve water quality.
OSR-3.8: Consult with State and regional agencies and the California
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), regarding open space
planning efforts.
Consult regularly with Native American representative regarding Fairview
Park items.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 69
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
OSR-3.9: Consult with the Orange Coast River Park, Inc. and
surrounding cities and other government agencies in maintaining and
rehabilitating open space lands along the Santa Ana River.
Meet regularly with OCRP to discuss long-term objectives and
compatibility with City efforts at Fairview Park.
OSR-3.10: Consult with OC Parks over the enhancements and
management of Talbert Regional Park without adversely impacting
surrounding residential neighborhoods.
Meet regularly with OCRP representatives.
GOAL OSR-4: Extensive Arts and Culture Programs and Services
Objective OSR-4A: Support performing and visual arts programs, facilities, and activities that stimulate the minds and intellectual thinking of
community members to increase awareness of the City’s motto, “The City of the Arts.”
OSR-4.1: Continue to support the mission of the Segerstrom Center for
the Arts and associate venues and facilities.
Partner on several events annually including ARTventure, Veterans Day
event, Summer Jazz series and Holiday events. Promote school of dance
inclusion programs.
OSR-4.2: Support the development and operations of an arts museum at
the Segerstrom Center for the Arts.
Participated in afternoon team fundraiser event, hosted Artventure on site
bringing more awareness and tourism to the areas.
OSR-4.3: Encourage additional indoor and outdoor facility spaces
citywide to display public art and host arts and culture special events.
Provide 4 (four) gallery spaces in City facilities for display of public
artwork. Host Artventure, Monthly artist showcase receptions, installation
of sculpture donation and historical plaque dedication.
OSR-4.4: Expand the City's role as a supporter of the arts.
Formally bring forth to City Council recommendation to adopt Arts and
Culture MP in 2021. The One Metro West project is also proposing a 1.5-
acre greenspace with public access that is intended to include a public
park; if approved, the project will need to be required to submit a Public
Arts Plan for review and approval by the Cultural Arts Committee.
OSR-4.5: Encourage financial support of the arts by supporting non-profit
groups and foundations. Ongoing - CAC grants program established.
OSR-4.6: Consider preparation of an arts and culture master plan for the
City.
Arts and Culture MP approved by the PACS commission; pending
approval from the City Council. Anticipated in 2021.
OSR-4.7: Consult with local agencies and surrounding cities to address
the creation and implementation of arts-friendly policies. Included in Arts and Culture Master Plan.
OSR-4.8: Enhance Costa Mesa’s position as a leader in the arts in
Southern California and its recognition nationally as a city devoted to arts
institutions of superior quality.
Included in Arts and Culture Master Plan.
OSR-4.9: Engage community members in arts activities, and utilize the
arts to provide educational and cultural awareness opportunities.
Extensive public outreach conducted for Arts and Culture Master Plan.
Artist Directory established and updated.
OSR-4.10: Continue the City’s commitment to its arts in cooperation with
the private sector.
The Arts and Culture Master Plan was approved by City Council on March
16, 2021. Budget discussions for FY21-21 will include Master Plan
Recommendations.
OSR-4.11: Provide opportunities for local artists to create and display
their work.
Four (4) art gallery spaces have been established. Several calls for
artists released annually for varying artistic participation by artists.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 70
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
OSR-4.12: Support arts activities, programs, events, and facilities for
patrons to enjoy and share experiences, and that enhance the City’s
economic vitality.
ARTventure event, Action Arts in the Park event, Concerts in the Park
events all incorporate art. Increased arts, language and music class
offerings for all ages have been offered.
OSR-4.13: Designate Community Services Department staff with the
responsibility for expanding and implementing activities related to
recreational arts programming.
Ongoing. Duties spread between FT and PT personnel, amongst other
varying duties. Upon approval of the Arts and Culture Master Plan, PACS
will request additional arts-focused personnel in future budgets.
OSR-4.14: Pursue cooperative educational cultural programs enlisting
the aid of public and private institutions.
Work with the NMUSD for the summer SMART Camp (Sports, Music and
Arts Camps).
OSR-4.15: Continue to review adopting an Arts in Public Places
Program.
Arts and Culture Master Plan potential recommendation. Ongoing –
Formal Public Art review process in process/research.
OSR-4.16: Pursue the placement of public art in prominent locations,
particularly along major travel corridors to enliven and beautify the public
realm.
Ongoing – Utility box program is at more than 40 installations on varying
travel corridors.
OSR-4.17: Develop incentives or programs that encourage art in new
developments. Arts and Culture Master Plan potential recommendation.
HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
Goal HCR-1: Historical, Archeological, and Paleontological Resource Preservation
Objective HCR-1A: Encourage preservation and protection of the City’s archaeological, paleontological, and historical resources.
HCR-1.1: Encourage protection and enhancement of the diverse range
of historical sites and resources in the City for the benefit of current and
future residents and visitors.
Committed to a phase IV of the Historical Marker Project and began a 50
Years and Still recognition project for businesses that have been open for
more than 50 years.
HCR-1.2: Encourage the preservation of significant historical resources
(as identified in Table HCR-1) by developing and implementing incentives
such as building and planning application permit fee waivers, Mills Act
contracts, grants and loans, and implementing other incentives identified
in the Historical Preservation Ordinance.
Mills Act website maintained and to be advertised semi-annually when the
Recreation Guide goes back into print.
HCR-1.3: Promote context-sensitive design that respects and
celebrates the history and historical character of sites and resources while
meeting contemporary needs of the community.
Continue to identify projects that can include this type of design.
HCR-1.4: Require, as part of the environmental review procedure, an
evaluation of the significance of paleontological, archaeological, and
historical resources, and the impact of proposed development on those
resources.
Currently preparing to revise the Fairview Park Master Plan.
HCR-1.5: Continue to identify local landmarks with markers and way-
finding signage. Include informational signage about local history, utilizing
maps to highlight locations of other historical resources at popular
historical sites.
Identified locations for six historical marker locations and purchased
plaques to complete Phase III of the Historical Marker Project. HPC voted
to explore opportunities for adding historical signage around the city.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition) Page 71
General Plan Goal, Objective, Policy Description of City Action
HCR-1.6: Encourage development of an interpretive center for
paleontological, archaeological, and historical resources at Fairview Park.
The center may contain resources found in the park area as well as
resources found throughout the City.
Currently preparing to revise the Fairview Park Master Plan.
HCR-1.7: Require cultural resources studies (i.e, archaeological and
historical investigations) for all applicable discretionary projects, in
accordance with CEQA regulations. The studies should identify cultural
resources (i.e., prehistorical sites, historical sites, and isolated artifacts
and features) in the project area, determine their eligibility for inclusion in
the California Register of Historical Resources, and provide mitigation
measures for any resources in the project area that cannot be avoided.
Cultural resources studies shall be completed by a professional
archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications Standards in prehistorical or historical archaeology.
This is also mandatory for any grading given passage of Measure AA in
2016.
HCR-1.8: Comply with requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act regarding protection and recovery of archaeological resources
discovered during development activities.
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
extensive grading.
HCR-1.9: Require paleontological studies for all applicable discretionary
projects. The studies should identify paleontological resources in the
project area, and provide mitigation measures for any resources in the
project area that cannot be avoided.
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
extensive grading.
HCR-1.10: Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act
regarding the protection and recovery of paleontological resources during
development activities.
Ongoing. Required as a standard condition of approval for projects with
extensive grading.
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition)
Attachment 1
Annual Progress Report (APR) Forms
For 2020
Jurisidiction Name
Reporting Calendar Year
First Name
Last Name
Title
Email
Phone
Street Address
City
Zipcode
v 3_18_21
Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used
when the workbook is new and empty. You will be prompted to
pick an old workbook to import from. Project and program data
will be copied exactly how it was entered in last year's form and
must be updated.
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa
92626
Please Start Here
General Information
2020
Costa Mesa
Contact Information
Justin
Arios
Assistant Planner
justin.arios@costamesaca.gov
7147545667
Mailing Address
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Current Year
Deed Restricted 9
Non-Deed Restricted 4
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 10
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 5
247
275
85
101
47
0
0
0
0
0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Total Units Constructed with Streamlining
Total Housing Applications Submitted:
Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:
Total Housing Units Approved:
Total Housing Units Disapproved:
Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-
income permitted units totals
Number of Applications for Streamlining
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Developments Approved with Streamlining
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Notes
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10
Prior APN+Current APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted
(see
instructions)
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Total PROPOSED
Units by Project
Total
APPROVED
Units by project
Total
DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Was APPLICATION
SUBMITTED
Pursuant to GC
65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 7 0 20 0 17 57 101 47 0 0
422-203-10 2156 Myran Dr PA-20-02 SFD O 02/04/2020 2 2 2 No
439-081-07 2648 Newport Blvd PA-20-05 SFA O 03/25/2020 9 9 No Project being reviewed
422-142-37
422-142-07
1978 Meyer Pl &
1979 Anaheim Ave PA-20-10 SFA O 08/04/2020 8 8 No Project approved in 2021
419-021-01 2070 Thurin St BC20-00055 SFA O 01/27/2020 1 1 No Unit A; PA-19-22; still in plan check;
419-021-01 2070 Thurin St BC20-00056 SFA O 01/27/2020 1 1 No Unit B; PA-19-22; still in plan check;
119-133-26 282 E 23rd St BC20-00089 ADU R 02/06/2020 1 1 1 No Eastside ADU (496 SF; studio)
426-032-40 1951 Rosemary Pl BC20-00111 ADU R 02/14/2020 1 1 No still in plan check; Eastside ADU (768 SF; 2 bed)
426-032-40 1951 Rosemary Pl BC20-00111 SFD O 02/14/2020 1 1 No still in plan check;
422-211-15 631 Victoria St BC20-00118 SFD O 02/19/2020 1 1 No still in plan check; PA-17-32
422-211-15 633 Victoria St BC20-00119 SFD O 02/19/2020 1 1 No still in plan check; PA-17-32
422-211-15 637 Victoria St BC20-00122 SFD O 02/19/2020 1 1 No still in plan check; PA-17-32
422-211-15 635 Victoria St BC20-00123 SFD O 02/19/2020 1 1 No still in plan check; PA-17-32
422-211-15 639 Victoria St BC20-00124 SFD O 02/19/2020 1 1 No still in plan check; PA-17-32
439-201-09 2645 Westminster Pl BC20-00200 SFD O 04/28/2020 1 1 1 No
425-312-10 377 La Perle Pl BC20-00204 SFD O 04/29/2020 1 1 1 No
425-312-10 379 La Perle Pl BC20-00205 SFD O 04/29/2020 1 1 1 No
425-312-09 385 La Perle Pl BC20-00206 SFD O 04/29/2020 1 1 1 No
425-312-09 387 La Perle Pl BC20-00207 SFD O 04/29/2020 1 1 1 No
426-302-07 381 Walnut St BC20-00210 SFD O 04/30/2020 1 1 1 No
426-152-14 272 Rose Ln BC20-00232 SFD O 05/18/2020 1 1 1 No
426-284-01 251 20th St BC20-00284 SFD O 06/17/2020 1 1 1 No previous address 1992 Westminster Pl
426-284-01 251 20th St, Unit B BC20-00285 ADU R 06/17/2020 1 1 1 No Eastside ADU (781 SF; 1 bed)
426-284-07 281 20th St BC20-00376 SFD O 08/06/2020 1 1 No still in plan check;
426-064-21 154 Albert Pl, Unit B BC20-00419 2 to 4 R 08/24/2020 1 1 No DR-19-03
426-261-13 1923 Church St BC20-00421 SFD O 08/25/2020 1 1 1 No
426-261-13 1921 Church St BC20-00422 SFD O 08/25/2020 1 1 1 No
422-091-07 532 Caleigh Ln BC20-00512 SFD O 10/14/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 528 Caleigh Ln BC20-00513 SFD O 10/14/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 523 Caleigh Ln BC20-00545 SFD O 10/28/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 527 Caleigh Ln BC20-00546 SFD O 10/28/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 531 Caleigh Ln BC20-00547 SFD O 10/28/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 539 Caleigh Ln BC20-00548 SFD O 10/28/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 524 Caleigh Ln BC20-00549 SFD O 10/28/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 520 Caleigh Ln BC20-00550 SFD O 10/28/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 516 Caleigh Ln BC20-00607 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-09 2073 Caleigh Ln BC20-00608 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 512 Caleigh Ln BC20-00609 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-08 2077 Caleigh Ln BC20-00610 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 515 Caleigh Ln BC20-00611 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-07 519 Caleigh Ln BC20-00612 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-08 2080 Caleigh Ln BC20-00613 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-09 2076 Caleigh Ln BC20-00614 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
422-091-09 2072 Caleigh Ln BC20-00615 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
424-203-04 785 Center St, Unit B BC20-00189 ADU R 04/21/2020 1 1 1 No Westside ADU (750 SF; 1 bed)
422-502-02 854 Oak St, Unit B BC20-00265 ADU R 06/09/2020 1 1 1 No Westside ADU (377 SF; studio)
422-261-15 1931 Pomona Ave, Unit G BC20-00316 ADU R 07/07/2020 1 1 1 No Westisde ADU (745 SF; 2 bed)
422-261-15 1931 Pomona Ave, Unit H BC20-00316 ADU R 07/07/2020 1 1 1 No Westisde ADU (745 SF; 2 bed)
119-092-06 238 E Wilson St, Unit B BC20-00385 ADU R 08/10/2020 1 1 1 No Eastside ADU (326 SF; studio)
141-312-22 2734 San Lucas Ln, Unit B BC20-00389 ADU R 08/11/2020 1 1 1 No Mesa del Mar ADU (688 SF; 1 bed)
422-251-08 700 W 20th St, Unit D BC20-00453 ADU R 09/14/2020 1 1 No Westside ADU (300 SF; studio)
139-421-13 1850 Paros Cir BC20-00583 ADU R 11/12/2020 1 1 No Mesa Verde ADU (772 SF; 1 bed)
422-412-36 2168 Placentia Ave, Unit E BC20-00673 ADU R 12/21/2020 1 1 No Westside ADU (745 SF; 2 bed)
422-412-36 2168 Placentia Ave, Unit F BC20-00674 ADU R 12/21/2020 1 1 No Westside ADU (745 SF; 2 bed)
426-191-10 198 E 20th St BC20-00675 ADU R 12/21/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (633 SF; 2 bed)
426-061-02 2214 Elden Ave BC20-00060 ADU R 01/29/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (1,199 SF; 2 bed)
425-321-13 340 Ramona Pl BC20-00072 ADU R 02/03/2020 1 1 1 No Eastside ADU (619 SF; studio)
425-143-47 1650 Tustin Ave BC20-00108 ADU R 02/12/2020 1 1 1 No Eastside ADU (1,188 SF; 2 bed)
141-157-07 3001 Murray Ln BC20-00114 ADU R 02/18/2020 1 1 No Halecrest ADU (845 SF; 1 bed)
139-383-35 1827 Pitcairn Dr BC20-00116 ADU R 02/18/2020 1 1 No Mesa Verde ADU (1,200 SF; 2 bed)
141-481-01 359 Nassau Rd BC20-00128 ADU R 02/20/2020 1 1 No College Park ADU (1,190 SF; 2 bed)
424-174-08 1833 Pomona Ave BC20-00172 ADU R 03/25/2020 1 1 No Westside ADU (642 SF; 1 bed)
422-452-07 2110 Monrovia Ave, Unit B BC20-00194 ADU R 04/22/2020 1 1 1 No Westside ADU (599 SF; 1 bed)
426-323-13 470 Walnut Pl, Unit B BC20-00199 ADU R 04/28/2020 1 1 1 No Eastside ADU (420 SF; studio)
141-322-02 933 Magellan St, Unit B BC20-00215 ADU R 05/05/2020 1 1 1 No Mesa del Mar ADU (400 SF; 1 bed)
117-294-19 355 E 19th St, Unit B BC20-00222 ADU R 05/11/2020 1 1 1 No Eastside ADU (897 SF; 2 bed)
141-038-10 3079 Warren Ln, Unit B BC20-00229 ADU R 05/14/2020 1 1 1 No Halecrest ADU (1,198 SF; 2 bed)
117-373-17 451 Cabrillo St, Unit B BC20-00264 ADU R 06/09/2020 1 1 1 No Eastside ADU (420 SF; studio)
426-211-15 282 E 20th St, Unit B BC20-00276 ADU R 06/15/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (498 SF; 1 bed)
425-212-02 1630 Santa Ana Ave BC20-00306 ADU R 06/29/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (336 SF; studio)
422-232-04 649 Seal St BC20-00322 ADU R 07/09/2020 1 1 No Westside ADU (123 SF; studio) - Extremely Low Income
439-211-14 201 Lillian Pl BC20-00343 ADU R 07/16/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (545 SF; studio)
425-321-06 321 Ramona Pl, Unit B BC20-00350 ADU R 07/17/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (740 SF; 1 bed)
422-521-03 910 Evergreen Pl, Unit B BC20-00369 ADU R 07/30/2020 1 1 1 No Westside ADU (291 SF; 1 bed)
141-611-25 1163 Salvador St BC20-00393 ADU R 08/11/2020 1 1 No Mesa del Mar ADU (1,200 SF; 2 bed)
117-341-19 492 Flower St BC20-00407 ADU R 08/18/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (574 SF; studio)
419-172-32 2113 Thurin St, Unit B BC20-00435 ADU R 08/31/2020 1 1 No Harbor / Newport area ADU (1,190 SF; 2 bed)
426-202-35 230 Sherwood Pl BC20-00469 ADU R 09/21/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (402 SF; studio)
117-372-29 493 Abbie Way BC20-00522 ADU R 10/16/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (562 SF; studio)
426-281-17 262 E 19th St, Unit B BC20-00532 ADU R 10/23/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (580 SF; 1 bed)
425-143-46 1654 Tustin Ave BC20-00552 ADU R 10/29/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (804 SF; studio)
422-232-03 645 Seal St BC20-00562 ADU R 10/30/2020 1 1 No Westside ADU (745 SF; 2 bed)
426-292-15 324 Costa Mesa St BC20-00578 ADU R 11/12/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (485 SF; 1 bed)
426-281-17 262 E 19th St, Unit C BC20-00616 ADU R 11/18/2020 1 1 No Eastside ADU (580 SF; 1 bed)
424-201-10 762 Center St BC20-00658 ADU R 12/10/2020 1 1 No Westside ADU (1,110 SF; 2 bed)
422-091-09 2068 Caleigh Ln BC19-00954 SFD O 11/18/2020 1 1 1 No PA-13-29
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
51
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units
Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction Notes
2 3 5 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Prior APN+Current APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Entitlement
Date Approved # of Units issued
Entitlements
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
How many of the
units were
Extremely Low
Income?+
Was Project
APPROVED using
GC 65913.4(b)?
(SB 35 Streamlining)
Y/N
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(see instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Restriction (years)
(if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000)+
Number of
Demolished/Dest
royed Units+
Demolished or
Destroyed Units+
Demolished/Des
troyed Units
Owner or
Renter+
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 9 4 0 10 0 5 247 275 0 0 0 3 0 4 133 140 0 0 22 0 0
426-261-13 1923 Church St PA-19-23 &
TPM 2019-143 SFD O 2 02/24/2020 2 0 0 N Y
425-312-10 377 La Perle Pl PA-19-28 &
TPM 2019-174 SFD O 2 03/23/2020 2 0 0 N Y
425-312-09 385 La Perle Pl PA-19-34 &
TPM 2020-103 SFD O 2 03/23/2020 2 0 0 N Y
422-203-10 2156 Myran Dr PA-20-02 SFD O 2 09/28/2020 2 0 0 N Y
119-092-06 238 E Wilson St, Unit B BC20-00385 ADU R
0 1 10/06/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (326 SF; studio)
422-091-07 512 Caleigh Ln BC20-00609 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 515 Caleigh Ln BC20-00611 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 516 Caleigh Ln BC20-00607 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 519 Caleigh Ln BC20-00612 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 520 Caleigh Ln BC20-00550 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/10/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 523 Caleigh Ln BC20-00545 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/10/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 524 Caleigh Ln BC20-00549 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/10/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 527 Caleigh Ln BC20-00546 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/10/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 528 Caleigh Ln BC20-00513 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/02/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 531 Caleigh Ln BC20-00547 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/10/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 532 Caleigh Ln BC20-00512 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/02/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 535 Caleigh Ln BC20-00956 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/10/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-07 539 Caleigh Ln BC20-00548 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/10/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-09 2068 Caleigh Ln BC19-00954 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-09 2072 Caleigh Ln BC20-00615 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-09 2073 Caleigh Ln BC20-00608 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-09 2076 Caleigh Ln BC20-00614 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-08 3077 Caleigh Ln BC20-00610 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-091-08 2080 Caleigh Ln BC20-00613 &
PA-13-29 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2020 1 0 N Y
422-261-15 1931 Pomona Ave, Unit
G BC20-00316 ADU R 0 1 11/19/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westisde ADU (745 SF; 2 bed)
422-261-15 1931 Pomona Ave, Unit
H BC20-00316 ADU R 0 1 11/19/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westisde ADU (745 SF; 2 bed)
141-312-22 2734 San Lucas Ln, Unit
B BC20-00389 ADU R 0 1 11/03/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Mesa del Mar ADU (688 SF; 1 bed)
422-271-20 752 W 19th St, Unit B BC19-00850 &
PA-18-47 SFA O 0 1 12/16/2020 1 0 N Y
422-271-21 756 W 19th St, Unit B BC19-00849 &
PA-18-47 SFA O 0 1 12/16/2020 1 0 N Y
424-203-04 785 Center St, Unit B BC20-00189 ADU R 0 1 12/16/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westside ADU (750 SF; 1 bed)
422-502-02 854 Oak St, Unit B BC20-00265 ADU R 0 1 12/03/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westside ADU (377 SF; studio)
426-152-14 272 Rose Ln BC20-00232 SFD O 0 1 12/03/2020 1 0 N Y
119-133-26 282 E 23rd St BC20-00089 ADU R 0 1 03/20/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (496 SF; studio)
420-012-16 1 Mark Ln BC19-00503 SFD O 0 1 03/20/2020 1 0 N Y
420-012-16 2 Mark Ln BC19-00504 SFD O 0 1 03/20/2020 1 0 N Y
425-311-55 1592 Riverside Pl BC19-00255 &
PA-18-22 SFD O 0 1 05/28/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 300 Ford Rd BC19-00098 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 301 Ford Rd BC19-00099 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 302 Ford Rd BC19-00097 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 303 Ford Rd BC19-00100 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 304 Ford Rd BC19-00096 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 305 Ford Rd BC19-00101 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 306 Ford Rd BC19-00095 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 307 Ford Rd BC19-00102 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 308 Ford Rd BC19-00094 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 309 Ford Rd BC19-00103 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 310 Ford Rd BC19-00093 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 311 Ford Rd BC19-00104 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 313 Ford Rd BC19-00105 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 315 Ford Rd BC19-00106 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 317 Ford Rd BC19-00107 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 318 Ford Rd BC19-00092 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 319 Ford Rd BC19-00108 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 06/12/2020 1 0 N Y
425-311-55 1590 Riverside Pl BC19-00256 &
PA-18-22 SFD O 0 1 06/03/2020 1 0 N Y
422-262-09 726 Lynn Ct BC18-00747 &
PA-17-46 SFD O 0 1 07/15/2020 1 0 N Y
422-262-09 730 Lynn Ct BC18-00748 &
PA-17-46 SFD O 0 1 07/15/2020 1 0 N Y
422-262-09 734 Lynn Ct BC18-00749 &
PA-17-46 SFD O 0 1 07/15/2020 1 0 N Y
422-262-09 738 Lynn Ct BC18-00750 &
PA-17-46 SFD O 0 1 07/15/2020 1 0 N Y
422-262-09 742 Lynn Ct BC18-00751 &
PA-17-46 SFD O 0 1 07/15/2020 1 0 N Y
426-171-09 2183 Tustin Ave BC19-00390 &
PM-18-06 SFD O 0 1 07/17/2020 1 0 N Y
426-171-09 2185 Tustin Ave BC19-00931 &
PM-18-06 SFA O 0 1 07/17/2020 1 0 N Y
426-171-09 2185 Tustin Ave BC19-00931 &
PM-18-06 ADU R 0 1 07/17/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (794 SF; 1 bed)
426-301-04 369 Costa Mesa St BC19-00984 SFD O 0 1 08/06/2020 1 0 N Y
426-302-07 381 Walnut St BC20-00210 SFD O 0 1 08/27/2020 1 0 N Y
426-284-01 251 E 20th St BC20-00284 SFD O 0 1 09/30/2020 1 0 N Y
426-284-01 251 E 20th St, Unit B BC20-00285 ADU R 0 1 09/30/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (781 SF; 1 bed)
419-212-04 336 Ford Rd BC19-00083 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 09/29/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 338 Ford Rd BC19-00082 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 09/29/2020 1 0 N Y
419-212-04 340 Ford Rd BC19-00075 &
PA-18-05 SFA O 0 1 09/29/2020 1 0 N Y
422-163-31 2277 Harbor Blvd BC19-00400 & 5+R 0 9 191 09/10/2020 200 0 N Y Other Other Affordable Housing Agreement 55
932-074-54 2994 Lumiere Dr BC16-01023 SFD O 0 0 1 01/07/2020 1 N Y
422-203-37 2160 Miner St BC17-00767 SFD O 0 0 1 01/09/2020 1 N Y
930-618-29 685 W 17th St BC19-00141 SFA O 0 0 1 01/09/2020 1 N Y
422-200-40 2150 Miner St BC17-00771 SFD O 0 0 1 01/10/2020 1 N Y
422-203-10 2156 Myran Dr BC19-00794 SFD O 0 0 0 01/24/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
410-441-17 14850 Sunflower Ave BC19-00806 ADU R 0 0 0 01/24/2020 0 N 1 Demolished R
424-291-15 619 Cardiff Reef BC18-00761 SFD O 0 0 1 02/03/2020 1 N Y
426-032-54 1989 Orange Ave BC17-00069 SFD O 0 0 0 02/12/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
424-291-13 683 W 17th St BC19-00140 SFA O 0 0 1 02/24/2020 1 N Y
117-332-37 418 E 18th St BC18-00972 ADU R 0 0 1 0 02/24/2020 1 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (799 SF; 2 bed)
141-242-03 944 Aurora Lane BC16-00990 SFD O 0 0 1 02/25/2020 1 N Y
426-284-01 1992 Westminster Ave BC20-00105 SFD O 0 0 0 02/25/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
117-372-45 474 Cabrillo St BC18-00384 ADU R 0 0 1 0 03/05/2020 1 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (790 SF; 1 bed)
141-242-03 943 Aurora Lane BC16-01005 SFD O 0 0 1 03/07/2020 1 N Y
424-291-13 681 W 17th St BC19-00147 SFA O 0 0 1 03/12/2020 1 N Y
424-291-13 1686 Grand View BC16-00862 SFA O 0 0 1 03/16/2020 1 N Y
422-131-03 2083 Maple Ave BC18-00051 ADU R 0 0 1 03/20/2020 1 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westside ADU (460 SF; studio)
426-303-01 1964 Raymond Ave BC19-00052 SFD O 0 0 0 03/25/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
439-281-43 134 Santa Isabel Ave BC20-00164 SFD O 0 0 0 03/26/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
439-281-43 136 Santa Isabel Ave BC20-00164 SFD O 0 0 0 03/26/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
424-291-13 673 W 17th St BC19-00145 SFA O 0 0 1 03/31/2020 1 N Y
419-212-04 328 Ford Rd BC19-00085 SFA O 0 0 1 05/07/2020 1 N Y
419-212-04 330 Ford Rd BC19-00086 SFA O 0 0 1 05/07/2020 1 N Y
439-262-03 172 E Wilson St BC19-00908 SFD O 0 0 0 05/11/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
425-451-27 130 B Magnolia St BC18-00092 2 to 4 R 0 0 1 05/14/2020 1 N Y
422-092-31 2060 Maple Ave BC19-00572 2 to 4 R 0 0 2 05/18/2020 2 N Y
422-442-06 2139 Union Ave BC19-00736 ADU R 0 0 1 05/19/2020 1 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westside ADU (389 SF; studio)
426-081-09 2219 Santa Ana Ave BC18-00906 SFD O 0 0 0 05/26/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
425-414-05 168 Cabrillo St BC18-00708 SFD O 0 0 1 05/28/2020 1 N Y
425-414-05 170 Cabrillo St BC18-00709 SFD O 0 0 1 05/28/2020 1 N Y
139-441-06 1992 Kornat Dr BC19-00280 SFD O 0 0 0 06/23/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
426-312-30 412 Esther St BC17-00635 SFD O 0 0 1 08/10/2020 1 N Y
426-302-07 381 Walnut St BC19-00749 SFD O 0 0 0 08/26/2020 0 N 1 Demolished O
425-312-10 377 La Perle Pl BC20-00345 2 to 4 R 0 0 0 08/27/2020 0 N 1 Demolished R
425-312-09 385 La Perle Pl BC20-00346 2 to 4 R 0 0 0 08/27/2020 0 N 2 Demolished R
424-101-13 1650 Monrovia Ave BC18-00410 5+R 0 0 111 09/15/2020 111 N Y
425-234-07 192 Flower St BC18-00866 SFD O 0 0 1 10/07/2020 1 N Y
424-291-13 675 W 17th St BC19-00138 SFA O 0 0 1 10/10/2020 1 N Y
117-291-16 352 E 18th St BC19-00399 ADU R 0 0 1 10/22/2020 1 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (615 SF; 1 bed)
117-372-28 487 Abbie Way BC19-00599 SFD O 0 0 1 11/05/2020 1 N Y
425-143-47 1650 Tustin Ave BC20-00108 ADU R 0 0 1 11/23/2020 1 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (1,188 SF; 2 bed)
426-152-14 272 Rose Ln BC20-00248 SFD O 0 0 06/10/2020 0 0 N 1 Demolished O
426-261-13 1923 Church St BC20-00267 SFD O 0 0 06/17/2020 0 0 N 1 Demolished O
141-073-01 3125 Yellowstone Dr BC20-00272 SFD O 0 0 06/24/2020 0 0 N 1 Demolished O
422-262-30 1966 Wallace Ave BC20-00014 &
PA-17-46 SFD R 0 0 01/08/2020 0 0 N 2 Demolished R
424-361-21 1775 Monrovia Ave BC20-00039 SFD O 0 0 01/28/2020 0 0 N 1 Demolished O
424-361-20 1777 Monrovia Ave BC20-00040 SFD O 0 0 01/28/2020 0 0 N 1 Demolished O
424-361-20 1781 Monrovia Ave BC20-00041 SFD O 0 0 01/28/2020 0 0 N 1 Demolished O
419-081-06 270 Joann St BC19-00699 ADU R 0 1 01/15/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
College Park ADU (567 SF; 1 bed)
422-424-13 2163 National Ave BC19-00414 ADU R 0 1 07/29/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westside ADU (580 SF; 2 bed)
425-321-13 340 Ramona Pl BC20-00072 ADU R 0 1 10/13/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (619 SF; studio)
141-322-02 933 Magellan St BC20-00215 ADU R 0 1 08/04/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Mesa del Mar ADU (400 SF; 1 bed)
422-452-07 2110 Monrovia Ave BC20-00194 ADU R 0 1 11/18/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westside ADU (599 SF; 1 bed)
426-313-11 470 Walnut Pl BC20-00199 ADU R 0 1 10/14/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (420 SF; studio)
141-038-10 3079 Warren Ln BC20-00229 ADU R 0 1 08/19/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Halecrest ADU (1,198 SF; 2 bed)
117-294-19 355 E 19th St BC20-00222 ADU R 0 1 10/29/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (897 SF; 2 bed)
422-521-03 910 Evergreen Pl BC20-00369 ADU R 0 1 10/01/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westside ADU (291 SF; 1 bed)
117-373-17 451 Cabrillo St BC20-00264 ADU R 0 1 10/22/2020 1 0 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Eastside ADU (420 SF; studio)
422-131-03 2083 Maple Ave BC18-00051 ADU R 0 0 1 03/20/2020 1 N Y SCAG ADU Affordability Analysis
& Project Specifics
Westside ADU (460 SF; studio)
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed UnitsProject Identifier
1
Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy
4 7 10
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
1 3 4
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Units to
Date (all years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by Income
Level
Deed Restricted 9
Non-Deed Restricted 4
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted 3 4 10
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted 1 2 5
Above Moderate 50 93 115 260 177 192 247 1134
2
50 93 115 260 181 198 275 1172
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
13
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past
year information comes from previous APRs.
8Moderate
1
1
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here
17
2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
Total RHNA
Total Units
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
Date of Rezone Type of Shortfall
2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Date of Rezone Very Low-Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Above Moderate-
Income
Type of Shortfall Parcel Size
(Acres)
General Plan
Designation Zoning Minimum
Density Allowed
Maximum
Density Allowed
Realistic
Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing
Uses
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
83
Project Identifier RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Sites Description
1
Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need
Table C
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 2 3 4
Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation
Owner-Occupied Housing
Rehabilitation
Assist 3 households annually for a total of 24
households (8 extremely low income, 8 very low
income, and 8 low income)
2021 During FY 19-20, the City completed 1 owner-occupied rehabilitation project (very low
income). For this Housing Cycle, a total of 7 owner-occupied rehabilitation projects
were completed (4 extremely low income, 1 very low income and 2 low income).
Mobile Home Rehabilitation Rehabilitation objectives are included under
Program 1, Neighborhood Improvement.
2021 The Zoning Code requires Planning Commission Approval to convert mobile homes to
another land use. During FY 19-20, the City completed 17 mobile home rehabilitation
projects (9 extremely low income, 6 very low income and 2 low income). For this
Housing Cycle, a total of 102 mobile home rehabilitation projects were completed (66
extremely low income, 32 very low income and 4 low income).
Go Green Continue to offer discount on permit fees for solar
panels and promote the program on City website
and public counters. Pursue funding to reinstate
the Go Green program.
2021 Review of solar panel permit fees are expidited and approved over the counter.
However, discounts are not offered on permit fees.
Incentives for Affordable
Housing
Promote the use of density bonus incentives and
deferral of fees for affordable housing projects,
including but not limited to, the Urban Plan areas
and in North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area.
Density bonus information is available on the
City’s website and at the public counter, and will
be provided to developers of projects in the Urban
Plan, North Costa Mesa Specific Plan areas, and
other areas targeted for future residential and
transit-oriented developments. Annually utilize the
HOME Community Housing Development
Organization (CHDO) funds to pursue affordable
housing projects, especially for permanent
affordable projects that may include accessible
units for the disabled. Provide a fee waiver to
projects that include at least ten percent housing
affordable to extremely low income households.
Engage the community and stakeholders to
explore and establish additional incentives and
funding sources, as appropriate, to promote
affordability in targeted growth areas by 2015 and
monitor and revise strategies, as appropriate, to
assure effectiveness as part of the annual
progress report.
2021 Implementing ordinance in effect, 115 density bonus units currently exist in the City as a
result of this ordinance. Annual review is conducted to ensure compliance with the
program's requirements in terms of maximum affordable rental rates. A separate
memo will be provided to the Planning Commission and City Council on the status of
the Density Bonus units in mid-2021.
Second Units Promote the use of second units by providing
information on the City’s website and at public
counters.
2021 In 2019, the City adopted an urgency ordinance amending Title 13 of Costa Mesa
Municipal Code, for compliance with new state regulations (Senate Bill 13, Assembly
Bill 68, Assembly Bill 587, Assembly Bill 670, Assembly Bill 671, and Assembly Bill
881). Over 30 ADUs were submitted, issued or finaled in 2020.
Federal/State Housing
Programs
Encourage private sector to utilize available
Federal and State housing programs to increase
the supply of extremely low, very low, low and
moderate income housing. If proposed projects
are consistent with the vision, goals, and
objectives of the City’s General Plan and other
planning documents that guide residential
development, the City will provide letters of
support for funding applications. In conjunction
with potential affordable housing projects in the
City, the City will pursue affordable housing funds
from HCD to leverage local resources. Annually,
the City will contact nonprofit housing developers
to explore potential affordable housing projects
and funding possibilities.
2021 Ongoing. No single- and multiple-family units constructed over the last several years
through a combination of public/private partnerships. No new units were constructed in
the past year.
Rental Housing Assistance Continue to provide assistance to 442 very low
income households in the City. Continue to
promote the use of Housing Choice vouchers by
providing program information on City website and
at public counters. Encourage property owners to
accept Housing Choice Vouchers.
2021 Ongoing rental assistance voucher program (formerly Section 8) assistance through
OCHA, during FY 19-20.
Preservation of At-Risk
Housing
Monitor at-risk status of affordable units. For Casa
Bella, work with HUD and the property owner to
extend the Section 8 rent subsidy contract. Notify
tenants of potential risk of conversion at least one
year prior to conversion. Provide information
regarding HUD’s special vouchers set aside for
households losing project-based Section 8
assistance (applicable to Casa Bella only). Work
with property owners and nonprofit housing
providers to pursue State and federal funds for
preserving at-risk housing. For density bonus
projects, require property owners to inform the
tenants of affordable units at least two years in
advance of the expiration of affordability controls
to allow tenants adequate time to explore other
affordable housing options. Work to replenish the
City’s affordable housing inventory via the City’s
Density Bonus ordinance to create new affordable
units.
2021 Implementing ordinance in effect, 115 density bonus units currently exist in the City as a
result of this ordinance. Annual review is conducted to ensure compliance with the
program's requirements in terms of maximum affordable rental rates. A separate
memo will be provided to the Planning Commission and City Council on the status of
the Density Bonus units in mid-2021.
Condominium Conversion Adopt condominium conversion ordinance in
Zoning Code in 2014 with the objective of
removing constraints to conversion.
2021 No apartment conversions were approved in 2020. The review procedures for
condominium conversions is consistent with other review procedures.
Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.
Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Adaptive Reuse for Multi-
Family Housing
Process Zoning Code Amendment in 2014/15 to
allow a discretionary review of motel conversions
to multi-family housing.
2021 In 2016, the City Council amended the Zoning Code to adopt the Residential Incentive
Overlay District, which expanded development opportunites on residential and
commercial properties not developed to their full potential or supporting outdated
buildings and underperforming uses, which included eight motels. In 2018, the City
Council amended the Zoning Code related to maximum allowable density, height
requirements, and reduced height abutting residential properties on Newport
Boulevard.
Supportive Services for
Persons with Special Needs
Conduct needs assessment through the annual
planning and performance review processes of
the CDBG program. Through the CDBG Request
for Proposal process, annually identify service
gaps and prioritize funding allocations. Provide
public service grants to:
• Support existing local service providers that
assist households that are at risk of becoming
homeless. Assistance may include short-term
financial subsidy to prevent eviction, foreclosure
and/or utility termination and support services
such as case management, budgeting/job search
assistance, and food/clothing (160 persons total).
• Support existing local service agencies that
provide short-term shelter (up to 3 months) to
households that are in immediate need of shelter
and support services. Funding may be focused on
but not limited to assisting households that are
escaping domestic violence (40 persons total).
• Support existing local service agencies that
provide transitional housing (3 to 24 months) to
homeless households that are stabilized yet still
require housing, case management, and other life
skills in order to become self sufficient (80
persons total).
• Provide financial support to public and nonprofit
organizations that provide direct services to
seniors and frail elderly. Services should help
seniors and the frail elderly maintain their
independent living situation or ensure they are
provided service that improves quality of life
(1,600 seniors total).
2021 As part of the Annual Action Plan, the City conducts needs assessments through the
annual planning and performance review processes of the CDBG program. The city
conducts a public hearing for the Annual Action Plan, including recommendations for
allocation of funds for the Fiscal Year. The Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 20-21
was approved by City Council at their May 19, 2020 meeting; and the Annual Action
Plan for Fiscal Year 21-22 will be reviewed by City Council in mid-2021.
Adequate Sites Update inventory of vacant and underutilized sites
annually and provide information to interested
developers. Pursue opportunities for transit-
oriented development as part of the City’s General
Plan update. Annually monitor the status of the
Fairview Developmental Center’s intent for the
future use of this site.
2021 In 2016, and as part of the 2015-2035 General Plan Update, the City Council adopted
and ordinance to amend the Municipal Code to include the Institutional and
Recreational - Multi-Use Zoning District, and to rezone the Fairview Developmental
Center property (2501 Harbor Boulevard) to Institutional and Recreational - Multi-Use
District.
Mixed-Use Developments Update inventory of opportunity sites annually and
make inventory available to interested developers.
Evaluate incentives package annually.
2021 A Mixed-Use Overlay District has been approved for the Bristol Street corridor area and
Westside Costa Mesa. This overlay district, in conjunction with Urban Plan documents,
will allow mixed-use development opportunities, and potentially 4,226 additional units
by the year 2025.
Annual General Plan
Review
As part of the City’s annual report to State
Development of Housing and Community
Development (HCD) for the implementation of the
General Plan (including Housing Element),
provide detailed progress in residential,
commercial, and industrial development. As part
of this annual review process, evaluate the
effectiveness of the PD Industrial zone in
facilitating the development of emergency
shelters.
2021 Annually, as part of the City's annual report to State Department of Housing and
Community Development (HCD), the City updates the City Council with progress
related to each General Plan policy.
Fair Housing Assistance Continue to provide fair housing services for all
residents of the City. Promote awareness of fair
housing via the City’s website and distribute fair
housing brochures at public counters and
community locations. Make fair housing
brochures available to nonprofit agencies.
Recognize April as the “Fair Housing Month” and
promote fair housing events through public
service announcements.
2021 The City is a member of a region-wide effort to ensure equal access to housing.
Generally, activites have included investigation, resolution and education. The City
provides fair housing brochures (multi-lingual including spanish and vietnamese) at
public counters, community locations, as well as on the City's website. During FY 19-
20, 153 Costa Mesa households were assisted with fair housing issues.
Promotion of Child Care
Facilities
Continue to apply development incentives
pursuant to the State density bonus law and Costa
Mesa Zoning Code to incorporate child care
centers as part of an affordable housing
development. Allow all incentives related to child
care centers as afforded by the State density
bonus provisions.
2021 To date, the City has not received any proposals for child care centers, additions to
existing developments, or included as an amenity to new construction projects,
pursuant to the State density bonus law.
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Units Constructed as Part of Agreement
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7
Table E
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
1 2
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Reporting Period 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Extremely Low-
Income+Very Low-Income+Low-Income+TOTAL UNITS+
Extremely Low-
Income+
Very Low-
Income+Low-Income+TOTAL UNITS+
Rehabilitation Activity
Preservation of Units At-Risk
Acquisition of Units
Mobilehome Park Preservation
Total Units by Income
Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with
the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are
considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.
Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be
counted, please contact HCD to receive the password that will enable
you to populate these fields.The description should adequately document how each
unit complies with subsection (c) of Government Code
Section 65583.1+
Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa
Reporting Period 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
2 3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Realistic Capacity
Identified in the
Housing Element
Entity to whom the site
transferred Intended Use for Site
1
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Table G
Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of
Project Identifier
NOTE: This table must only be filled out if the housing element
sites inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the
reporting jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise
disposed of during the reporting year.
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa
Note: "+" indicates
an optional field
Reporting Period 2020
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Cells in grey
contain auto-
calculation formulas
Designation Size Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of
Units
Surplus
Designation
Parcel Size (in
acres)Notes
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Sites
Jurisdiction Costa Mesa
Reporting Year 2020 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26.
Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement
Requested
Other
Funding Notes
Housing Element Update 55000 0 Other SB2 Grant other
funding
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance 70000 0 None
General Plan Amendment and
Zoning Actions necessary to
implement the Housing Element
375000 0 None
to be started upon
certification of the
Housing Element
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Table A2)
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
8
8
Current Year
Deed Restricted 9
Non-Deed Restricted 4
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 10
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 5
247
275
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 3
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 4
133
140
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Other (Please Specify in Notes)
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section
50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
500,000.00$
Task Status
In Progress
In Progress
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition)
Appendix A
2015-2035 General Plan
Goals, Objectives, Policies
2015–2035 Costa Mesa General Plan
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
- 2020 Annual Review -
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 2
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES
Each element of the General Plan contains goals and policies based upon the needs and
desires of the community, as derived from the previously adopted 2015-2035 General Plan,
background research, planning staff, and members of the City Council.
A goal is defined as a broad vision of what the community wants to achieve or provide to
residents, landowners, business owners and tourists. It is a statement of a desired condition
based on community values. Goals are general in nature and usually timeless. A policy is a
specific statement that guides decision-making. It indicates a commitment of the City to a
particular course of action. A policy is based on and helps implement a goal.
One of the objectives for the 2015-2035 General Plan and General Plan EIR was to review
the 2000 General Plan goals, objectives, and policies for relevancy, completion and
applicability for the long-term development in the City. City staff reviewed the goals,
objectives, and policies in the 2000 General Plan and determined if the goals, objectives, and
policies had been completed, and if not, determined their relevancy and applicability for the
2015-2035 General Plan. The following are the goals and associated objectives and policies
that have been set for the Costa Mesa 2015-2035 General Plan.
At the conclusion of each goal, objective or policy is a statement within [brackets] that
indicates one of four possible scenarios: 1) the goal, objective, or policy remains the same as
the 2000 General Plan, 2) the goal, objective or policy has been modified from the 2000
General Plan statement for the 2015-2035 General Plan, 3) the goal, objective or policy is a
new statement for the 2000 General Plan, or 4) in the case of the Housing Element, no
changes were made to the goals, objectives or policies. Examples of the wording for the
aforementioned scenarios are as follows:
1) [2000 GP Goal LU-1],
2) [2000 GP Policy LU-1A.4 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP],
3) [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP], and
4) [No Change].
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 3
Land Use Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address land use are as follows:
Goal LU-1:
A Balanced Community with a Mix of Land Uses to Meet Resident and Business Needs [2000 GP Goal
LU-1]
Objective LU-1A: Establish and maintain a balance of land uses throughout the
community to preserve the residential character of the City at a level no
greater than can be supported by the infrastructure. [2000 GP Objective
LU-1A]
LU-1.1 Provide for the development of a mix and balance of housing opportunities,
commercial goods and services, and employment opportunities in consideration
of the needs of the business and residential segments of the community. [2000
GP Policy LU-1A.1]
LU-1.2 Balance economic gains from new development while preserving the character
and densities of residential neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-1.3 Strongly encourage the development of residential uses and owner-occupied
housing (single-family detached residences, condominiums, townhouses) where
feasible to improve the balance between rental and ownership housing
opportunities. [2000 GP Policy LU-1A.4]
LU-1.4 Promote housing and employment opportunities within planned development
areas to the extent feasible. [2000 GP Policy LU-1A.5]
LU-1.5 Maintain a land use structure that strives to balance jobs and housing with
available infrastructure and public and human services. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Goal LU-2:
Preserve and Protect Residential Neighborhoods [2000 GP Goal LU-1]
Objective LU-2A: Promote land use patterns and development that contribute to
community and neighborhood identity. [2000 GP Objective LU-1C]
LU-2.1 In the event of damage or destruction, allow any legal conforming use in
existence at the time of adoption of the General Plan that is located in a
nonconforming development to be rebuilt to its original building intensity, as long
as any such rebuilding would not increase the development's nonconformity, and
the damage or destruction was in no way brought about by intentional acts of any
owner of such use or property. [2000 GP Policy LU-2A.4]
LU-2.2 Pursue maximum use of utility company funds and resources in undergrounding
existing overhead lines, and encourage undergrounding of utilities in the public
right-of-way for residential development consisting of five units or more, to the
extent feasible and practical. [2000 GP Policy LU-2A.9 – Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
LU-2.3 Develop standards, policies, and other methods to encourage the grouping of
individual parcels to eliminate obsolete subdivision patterns and to provide
improved living environments while being consistent with the neighborhood
character of the surrounding community. [2000 GP Policy LU-2A.5 – Modified for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 4
LU-2.4 Do not allow "rounding up" when calculating the number of permitted residential
units, except for lots existing as of March 16, 1992, zoned R2-MD that have less
than 7,260 square feet in area, and no less than 6,000 square feet, where
density calculation fractions of 1.65 or greater may be rounded up to two units.
[2000 GP Policy LU-2A.6]
LU-2.5 Allow creation of parcels without street frontage if sufficient easements are
provided for planned developments or common-interest developments consistent
with the neighborhood character. This policy does not apply to small lot
subdivisions. [2000 GP Policy LU-2A.7]
LU-2.6 Encourage increased private market investment in declining or deteriorating
neighborhoods. [2000 GP Policy LU-2A.8]
LU-2.7 Permit the construction of buildings over two stories or 30 feet only when it can
be shown that the construction of such structures will not adversely impact
surrounding developments and deprive existing land uses of adequate light, air,
privacy, and solar access. [2000 GP Policy LU-1C.1]
LU-2.8 Limit building height to four stories above grade south of the I-405 Freeway,
except for special purpose housing such as elderly, affordable, or student
housing, unless otherwise approved by a General Plan amendment. (A four-
story/five-level parking structure with roof deck parking on the fifth level is
considered a four-story structure.) [2000 GP Policy LU-1C.2]
LU-2.9 Require appropriate building setbacks, structure orientation, and placement
windows to consider the privacy of adjacent residential structures within the
same project and on adjacent properties. [2000 GP Policy LU-1C.4]
LU-2.10 Promote lot consolidation of residential properties to the extent feasible and
practical, including the creation of larger single-family residential lots that exceed
the minimum 6,000-square-foot requirement in neighborhoods where the
prevailing residential subdivision pattern features larger-sized residential lots.
[2000 GP Policy LU-1C.5 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-2.11 Ensure adequate noise attenuation in urban design, such as walls for sound
attenuation, development of landscaped greenbelts, provision of landscape
berms, etc. [2000 GP Policy LU-1C.6 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU-3:
Development that Maintains Neighborhood Integrity and Character [2000 GP Goal LU-1]
Objective LU-3A: Establish policies, standards, and procedures to minimize blighting
influences, and maintain the integrity of stable neighborhoods. [2000 GP
Objective LU-1F]
LU-3.1 Protect existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including mobile home
parks (and manufactured housing parks), from the encroachment of incompatible
or potentially disruptive land uses and/or activities. [2000 GP Policy LU-1F.1]
LU-3.2 Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or abandoned vehicles,
outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal buildings, and establish regulations to
abate weed-filled yards when any of the above are deemed to constitute a
health, safety, or fire hazard. [2000 GP Policy LU-1F.2]
LU-3.3 Continue code enforcement as a high priority with regard to the regulation of
property maintenance standards citywide. [2000 GP Policy LU-1F.3 – Modified
for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 5
LU-3.4 Ensure that residential densities can be supported by the infrastructure and are
compatible with existing residential neighborhoods in the surrounding area. [2000
GP Policy LU-1F.4 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-3.5 Provide opportunities for the development of well-planned and designed projects
which, through vertical or horizontal integration, provide for the development of
compatible residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or public uses within a
single project or neighborhood. [2000 GP Policy LU-1F.5]
LU-3.6 Facilitate revitalization of aging commercial centers by working with property
owners, developers, local businesses, and other community organizations to
coordinate efforts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-3.7 Promote development/design flexibility that encourages older or poorly
maintained high-density residential uses to be rehabilitated. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
LU-3.8 Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards, qualities, and
features that are in context with nearby development and surrounding residential
neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-3.9 Locate high-intensity developments or high-traffic-generating uses away from
low-density residential in order to buffer the more sensitive land uses from the
potentially adverse impacts of the more intense development or uses. [2000 GP
Policy LU-1A.3]
LU-3.10 Minimize effects of new development on the privacy and character of surrounding
neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-3.11 Promote small-lot residential development on long, narrow, single parcels or
combined residential lots. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-3.12 Ensure that new development reflects existing design standards, qualities, and
features that are in context with nearby development. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
LU-3.13 Prohibit construction of buildings which would present a hazard to air navigation,
as determined by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). [2000 GP Policy LU-
1C.3 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-3.14 Certain development proposals which may include the construction or alteration
of structures more than 200 feet above ground level may require filing with the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC)
pursuant to federal and State law. If a filing requirement is determined to be
necessary in accordance with the procedures provided by State/federal
agencies, the filing of a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form
7460-1) shall be required prior to review and consideration of the proposed
development.” Land Use Element (page LU-18) refers to the threshold stated
above. It shall be amended to refer to Filing FAA Form 7460-1 Notice of
Construction and Alteration, and not to Form 7480-1. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
LU-3.15 The City will ensure that development proposals, including the construction or
operation of a heliport or helistop comply fully with permit procedures under State
law, including referral of the project to the ALUC by the applicant, and with all
conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the Federal Aviation
Administration, ALUC, and Caltrans, including the filing of Form 7480-1 (Notice of
Landing Area Proposed) with the FAA. This requirement shall be in addition to
all other City development requirements. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 6
LU-3.16 The City shall refer certain projects to the Airport Land Use Commission for
Orange County, as required by Section 21676 of the California Public Utilities
Code to determine consistency of the project(s) with the Airport Environs Land
Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU 3.17 New residential developments within the 60 dB CNEL noise contour of the airport
shall provide designated outdoor signage informing the public of the presence of
operating aircraft. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU-4:
New Development that Is Sensitive to Costa Mesa’s Environmental Resources [2000 GP Goal LU-2]
Objective LU-4A: Encourage new development and redevelopment that protects and
improves the quality of Costa Mesa’s natural environment and
resources. [2000 GP Objective LU-2A]
LU-4.1 Ensure that appropriate watershed protection activities are applied to all new
development and significant redevelopment projects that are subject to the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit during the
planning, project review, and permitting processes. [2000 GP Policy LU-2A.10]
LU-4.2 Avoid conversion of areas particularly susceptible to erosion and sediment loss
(e.g., steep slopes) and/or establish development guidelines that identifies these
areas and protects them from erosion and sediment loss. [2000 GP Policy LU-
2A.11]
LU-4.3 Preserve or restore areas that provide water quality benefits and/or are
necessary to maintain riparian and aquatic biota. [2000 GP Policy LU-2A.12]
LU-4.4 Promote site development that limits impact on and protects the natural integrity
of topography, drainage systems, and water bodies, and protect the integrity of
the bluff crest. [2000 GP Policy LU-2A.13]
LU-4.5 Promote integration of stormwater quality protection into construction and post-
construction activities, as required by the NPDES Stormwater Permit and the
City’s Local Implementation Plan. [2000 GP Policy LU-2A.14]
LU-4.6 Incorporate the principles of sustainability into land use planning, infrastructure,
and development processes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions consistent with
State goals. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU-5:
Adequate Community Services, Transportation System, and Infrastructure to Meet Growth [2000 GP
Goal LU-1 and Goal LU-3]
Objective LU-5A: Ensure availability of adequate community facilities and provision of the
highest level of public services possible, taking into consideration
budgetary constraints and effects on the surrounding area. [2000 GP
Objective LU-3A]
LU-5.1 Pursue annexation of certain areas within the City's Sphere of Influence to
provide land use regulation and city services within its jurisdiction. [2000 GP
Policy LU-3A.1]
LU-5.2 Strongly encourage protection and preservation of existing but underutilized
school sites for future recreational, social, or educational uses. [2000 GP Policy
LU-3A.2]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 7
LU-5.3 As appropriate and timely, consider the establishment of development impact fee
program(s) to fund additional fire and police personnel, library facilities, and
related equipment to meet the demands of additional growth in the City. [2000
GP Policy LU-3A.3 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-5.4 Require appropriate site and environmental analysis for future fire and police
station site locations or for the relocation or closure of existing fire and police
facilities. [2000 GP Policy LU-3A.4]
LU.5.5 Ensure that new development pays its fair share of impact fees such as park fees
and traffic impact fees. This can also include impact fees related to community
services (police protection services and fire emergency response services) or
library facilities, once adopted and applicable. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-5.6 Promote development of revenue-generating land uses to help defray the costs
of high quality public services. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-5.7 Encourage new development that is organized around compact, walkable,
mixed-use neighborhoods and districts to conserve open space resources,
minimize infrastructure costs, and reduce reliance on the automobile. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-5.8 Include an evaluation of impacts on utility systems and infrastructure in EIRs for
all major general plan amendment, rezone, and development applications. [2000
GP Policy LU-1D.1]
LU-5.9 Phase or restrict future development in the City to that which can be
accommodated by infrastructure at the time of completion of each phase of a
multi-phased project. [2000 GP Policy LU-1D.2]
LU-5.10 Building densities/intensities for proposed new development projects shall not
exceed the trip budget for applicable land use classifications, as identified in the
Land Use Element. Building intensities for proposed new development projects
shall not exceed the applicable floor area standards, except for the following
conditions:
(a) Limited deviations from the graduated floor-area ratio standards for the
commercial and industrial land use designations may be approved
through a discretionary review process. No deviation shall exceed a
0.05 increase in the FAR in the moderate traffic category, and no
deviation shall be allowed in the very low, low, and high traffic
categories. Deviations from the FAR standards shall not cause the daily
trip generation for the property to be exceeded when compared to the
existing daily trip generation for the site without the proposed project or
maximum allowable traffic generation for the Moderate Traffic FAR
category, whichever is greater.
(b) Additions to existing nonconforming nonresidential developments may
be allowed if the additions do not affect the overall traffic generation
characteristics of the development and if the additions do not
substantially affect the existing height and bulk of the development.
Additions to nonresidential developments shall be limited to those land
uses with traffic generation rates based on variables other than building
area square footage. Examples of such additions include, but are not
limited to: 1) Hotels/motels: Increases in the size of hotel rooms or
lobbies where no increase in the total number of rooms is proposed,
and 2) theaters: Increases to “back-stage” support areas or lobbies
where no increase in the total number of seats is proposed.
(c) In the above conditions, the new development shall be compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 8
(d) Additional criteria for approving deviations from the FAR standards may
be established by policy of the City Council. [2000 GP Policy LU-1E.1 –
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-5.11 Development plans shall be required for all phased development and approvals
and shall be approved by the Planning and Transportation Services Divisions
prior to the issuance of building permits. [2000 GP Policy LU-1E.2]
LU-5.12 Development plans shall include an overall buildout plan, which can demonstrate
the ability of the circulation system to support the proposed level of development.
[2000 GP Policy LU-1E.3]
LU-5.13 The City shall continue its annual preparation of the Development Phasing and
Performance Monitoring Program. The annual review will specifically address
major intersection operations in any mixed-use overlay area. [2000 GP Policy
LU-1E.4]
Goal LU-6:
Economically Viable and Productive Land Uses that Increase the City’s Tax Base [2000 GP Goal LU-1]
Objective LU-6A: Ensure the long-term productivity and viability of the community's
economic base. [2000 GP Objective LU-1B]
LU-6.1 Encourage a mixed of land uses that maintain and improve the City’s long-term
fiscal health. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.2 Continue to promote and support the vitality of commercial uses to meet the
needs of local residents and that support regional-serving commercial centers.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.3 Continue to prioritize commercial and industrial park use of properties north of I-
405 and within the Airport Industrial District. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.4 Support the continued presence of incubator businesses in the action sports
industry and jobs-producing businesses in the Westside. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
LU-6.5 Encourage revitalization of existing, older commercial and industrial areas in the
Westside with new mixed-use development consisting of ownership housing
stock and live/work units. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.6 Continue to encourage and retain land uses that generate sustainable sales and
property tax revenues, including regional commercial destinations and
automobile dealerships. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.7 Encourage new and retain existing businesses that provide local shopping and
services. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.8 Provide efficient and timely review of development proposals while maintaining
quality customer service standards for the business, development, and
residential community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.9 Support the retention and growth of Class A office tenants, including corporate
headquarters for the action sports industry, biotech, and high technology
companies within the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 9
Objective LU-6B: Encourage and facilitate activities that expand the City’s revenue base.
[New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.10 Encourage a broad range of business uses that provide employment at all
income levels and that make a positive contribution to the City’s tax base. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.11 Provide opportunities for mixed-use, office, manufacturing, and retail
development that respond to market and community needs in terms of size,
location, and cost. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.12 Track retail trends and tailor regulations to respond to market changes, maximize
revenue, and maintain the appropriate the business mix. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
LU-6.13 Encourage new development along major corridors that are pedestrian oriented
and includes a mixture of retail/service, residential, and office uses. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.14 Improve ease and accessibility to information to capture opportunities for
businesses to establish in Costa Mesa and bring high-skill and professional jobs
and new revenue sources into the community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.15 Promote unique and specialized commercial and industrial districts within the
City which allow for incubation of new or growing businesses and industries.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.16 Examine options for the development of new infrastructure for new technologies
and businesses that use those technologies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective LU-6C: Retain and expand the City’s diverse employment base, including office,
retail/service, restaurants, high-tech, action sports, boutique and
prototype manufacturing, and industrial businesses. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.17 Engage in activities that promote Costa Mesa as a great place to live, work, and
develop a business. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.18 Continue to work with surrounding cities to strengthen regional economic
development. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-6.19 Provide flexibility and support for development of residential, office, small retail
centers, and similar uses that would serve local residents and would also benefit
from the high visibility along major corridors outside of significant commercial or
industrial nodes. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU-7:
A Sound Local Sustainable Economy that Attracts Investment, Creates Educational Opportunities, and
Generates Employment Opportunities [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-7.1 Endeavor to create mixture of employment opportunities for all economic levels
of residents and businesses. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-7.2 Support linkages between local educational institutions and local industries and
businesses. Foster training, collaboration with employers, and new innovative
programs that increase job opportunities for residents and students attending
school locally. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-7.3 Foster and provide useful and efficient partnerships to implement economic
opportunities with private, non-profit, or other public agencies. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 10
LU-7.4 Cultivate an entrepreneurial and academic environment that fosters innovation
through non-traditional housing developments, flexible office spaces, experiential
development, and ensuring the diversity of retail/service throughout the urban
districts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-7.5 Support and provide flexibility for development projects and businesses which
produce, care, and maintain material goods or fixed assets meant to support the
production of market goods, especially for niche industries within the City of
Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-7.6 Seek out opportunities to attract primary businesses within stable industries and
support industries that already exist within the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
LU-7.7 Explore economic and employment opportunities to retain and strengthen the
unique industry niches along Bristol and Paularino, in the Westside, on East 17th
Street, and throughout North Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-7.8 Support the development of pedestrian plazas and gathering places, and
institutional spaces, as well as the more efficient use of existing spaces, to
support economic growth and branding of existing industries within the City. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU-8:
Promote a range of multiple uses at the Fairview Developmental Center site [New Goal for 2015-2035
GP]
LU-8.1 In anticipation of the potential closure or repurposing of the Fairview
Development Center site, the City will work with appropriate State agencies or
private entity (if the property is sold) to plan for a complementary mix of low-scale
residential, institutional, public facilities, open spaces, and recreational uses
within a campus setting. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU-9:
Ensure that Fairgrounds uses are consistent with the General Plan designation [New Goal for 2015-
2035 GP]
LU-9.1 Discourage changes in the allowable uses specified in the Fairgrounds General
Plan land use designation for the Orange County Fair & Event Center property.
Ensure that amendments to this General Plan designation are approved by the
electorate. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal LU-10:
Promote the growth of tourism [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective LU-10A: Promote structural improvements of visitor-oriented land uses. [New
Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-10.1 Engage with property owners, developers, and business owners to encourage
the revitalization of the hotel/motels. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 11
LU-10.2 Provide incentives to motel development projects seeking to improve existing
motel facilities by increasing the hotel rating. These projects may include:
a. Updating building mechanical, electrical, or plumbing to comply with current
building standards
b. Updating physical improvements to the site
c. Adding hotel amenities to the site
d. Updating or improving the landscaping on the site
e. Updating or improving the façade of the building(s) [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Objective LU-10B: Promote growth of visitor-oriented land uses. [New Objective for 2015-
2035 GP]
LU-10.3 Motel and hotel land uses should be encouraged to be located near major
transportation corridors and close to key tourist/visitor draws, other recreation
venues, the airport, regional, and general local shopping centers. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
LU-10.4 Consider the interest of quality of stay for visitors when evaluating projects near
visitor-oriented land uses by requiring on-site amenities and upscale guest
services. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective LU-10C: Promote uses and events that make visitor-oriented business more
economically viable. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-10.5 Celebrate and promote the arts, culture, and industries of Costa Mesa through
special events, civic gatherings, and City marketing and tourism promotion
efforts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-10.6 Promote the development of small-scale manufacturing uses or other uses that
generate multiple secondary and tertiary markets that support business travel
tourism-related uses. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
LU-10.7 Maintain and enhance the City’s status and image as a centrally located
destination and cultural center in Orange County. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 12
Circulation Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address circulation are as follows:
Goal C‐1:
Implement “Complete Streets” Policies on Roadways in Costa Mesa
Plan, develop, and implement a comprehensive transportation system that serves all users and modes
of travel. [2000 GP Goal CIR-1 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C‐1A: Create a transportation network that meets the mobility needs of all
Costa Mesa residents, businesses, and visitors. [2000 GP Objective
CIR-1A – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.1: Update the City’s engineering standards for public and private streets to provide
for safe, comfortable, and attractive access and travel for pedestrians, bicyclists,
motorists, and transit users of all ages, abilities, and modes of travel. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.2: Allow for flexible use of public rights‐of‐way to accommodate all users of the
street system while maintaining safety standards. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.3: Complete and annually maintain a needs assessment for traffic service levels
and traffic safety. Develop and annually update a priority list of improvement
projects, with priorities based on: 1) correcting identified hazards; 2)
accommodating multimodal trips; 3) improving and/or maintaining peak‐hour
traffic volumes at critical intersections; 4) improving efficiency of existing
infrastructure utilization; and 5) intergovernmental coordination. [2000 GP Policy
CIR-2C.2]
C‐1.4: Pursue downgrade of arterials that no longer have the demand requiring their
buildout to planned capacity. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.5: Implement road diets on street segments with excess capacity to enhance
bicycle and pedestrian facilities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.6: Encourage the conversion of excess on‐street parking spaces for expanded
sidewalk gathering places or landscaping. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.7: Encourage community participation in City processes and programs focused on
improving mobility and transportation facilities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.8: Pursue downgrade of 17th Street from 6-lane Major Arterial to 4-lane Primary
Arterial between Orange Ave and Tustin Avenue, through Master Plan of Arterial
Highways (MPAH) Amendment process with the Orange County Transportation
Authority. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C‐1B: Preserve the character of our residential neighborhoods. [2000 GP
Objective CIR-1A – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.9: Implement traffic calming measures that discourage speeding and cut-through
traffic on residential streets. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.14]
C‐1.10: Encourage non-motorized transportation in residential areas by providing
sidewalks and implementing bicycle friendly design of local streets. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.11: Reduce or eliminate intrusion of traffic related to non-residential development on
local streets in residential neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 13
C‐1.12: Prioritize intersection improvements which improve through traffic flow on Major,
Primary, and Secondary Arterials, and reduce impacts on local neighborhood
streets with emphasis on pedestrian safety. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.14]
C‐1.13: Promote engineering improvements such as physical measures constructed to
lower speeds, improve safety, and otherwise reduce the impacts of motor
vehicles. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.14: Design and Implement transportation projects to meet local and regional system
capacity needs in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.15: Implement neighborhood approved traffic-calming measures in residential
neighborhoods and appropriate commercial areas, such as street narrowing,
curb extensions, roundabouts, landscaped medians, and radar speed feedback
signs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.16: Establish priority‐ranking system to evaluate traffic-calming requests for
implementation throughout the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐1.17: Pursue programs that reduce vehicle speeds and cut‐through traffic on local
streets. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal C‐2:
Effectively Manage and Improve the Roadway System
Develop and maintain a robust and efficient vehicular circulation network. [2000 GP Goal CIR-1 –
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C‐2A: Implement policies that encourage and accommodate all users while
maintaining the efficiency of the circulation system. [2000 GP Objective
CIR-1A – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.1: Establish a citywide crosswalk policy to address installation, maintenance,
removal, and enhancements of crosswalks at intersections and mid‐block
locations. Crosswalk locations and treatment will be based on criteria including,
but not limited to safety, traffic volume, and concentration of pedestrian activity.
Potential enhancements may include leading pedestrian intervals at signalized
intersections, bulb‐outs, and median refuges to reduce crossing distances. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.2: Avoid creation of frequent driveways for new development access in active
pedestrian areas that create conflict points between pedestrians and vehicles.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.3: Encourage commercial property owners to use shared driveway access and
interconnected roads within blocks, where feasible. Require driveway access
closures or consolidations, or both when a site is remodeled or redeveloped.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.4: Collaborate with law enforcement and public safety organizations to coordinate
policies and programs that would reduce injuries and deaths on the roadways.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.5: Designate routes for truck traffic to minimize potential conflicts between trucks
and cars, pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and vehicle access and circulation.
Establish by ordinance a truck map that depicts allowable truck routes within the
City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 14
C‐2.6: Periodically review and update traffic signal timing at all signalized intersections
to maintain traffic signal coordination and to accommodate bicycle and
pedestrian needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.7: Develop new traffic level of services criteria in accordance with SB 743 to meet
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.8: Continue the use of the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to
address local traffic level of service and impacts, with Level of Service “D” as the
threshold for meeting the City’s significance criteria. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Objective C‐2B: Construct street improvements and apply congestion management tools
to obtain efficient performance of the transportation system. [2000 GP
Objective CIR-1A – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.9: Incorporate the street system improvements identified in the General Plan
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) into the Capital Improvement Program. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.10: Continue to deploy intelligent transportation systems (ITS) strategies—such as
adaptive signal controls, fiber optic communication equipment, closed circuit
television cameras, real‐time transit information, and real‐ time parking
availability information—to reduce traffic delays, lower greenhouse gas
emissions, improve travel times, and enhance safety for drivers, pedestrians, and
cyclists. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.11: Investigate all operational measures, including the use of one‐way streets, to
improve traffic circulation and to minimize congestion for all travel modes. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.12: Investigate and utilize state‐of‐the‐art transportation system management
technology and industry practices to address recurring and non‐recurring traffic
events (i.e., special events, incident/emergency management). [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C‐2.13: Continue to evaluate and pursue design and operational improvements
(medians, driveway closures, signal synchronization or phasing, parking or turn
restrictions, etc.) to improve the efficiency of intersections. [2000 GP Policy CIR-
2A.4]
Goal C‐3:
Enhance Regional Mobility and Coordination
Encourage development of a regional transportation network that addresses regional mobility needs for
all modes of travel. [2000 GP Goal CIR-1 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C‐3A: Promote development of transportation projects along regional
corridors. [2000 GP Objective CIR-1A – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐3.1: Maintain compliance with Orange County Congestion Management Plan (CMP)
requirements, including consistency with CMP level of service standards,
adoption of a seven‐year capital improvement program, analysis of impacts of
land use decisions on the CMP highway system, and adoption and
implementation of deficiency plans when intersections do not meet adopted
performance standards. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 15
C‐3.2: Support the goals and objectives of the Orange County Long Range
Transportation Plan, including expansion of transportation system choices,
improvement of transportation system performance, and sustainability of
transportation infrastructure. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐3.3: Support the goals and objectives of the SCAG Regional Transportation
Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), including expansion of
transportation system choices, improvement of transportation system
performance, and sustainability of transportation infrastructure. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C‐3.4: Coordinate signal timing on all major arterials with a local signal synchronization
program consistent with the Orange County Traffic Signal Synchronization
Master Plan (TSSMP). [2000 GP Policy CIR-2A.2 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐3.5: Ensure Costa Mesa’s input, participation, and discretionary review of applicable
region‐wide transportation system policies, programs, and construction. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐3.6: Develop short-term and long-term improvements to the SR-55 corridor in
coordination with Caltrans and OCTA to address regional mobility needs. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐3.7: Promote the City’s preferred alternative of undergrounding the SR-55 freeway
south of 19th Street within the City limits. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C‐3B: Coordinate and partner with local and regional agencies to promote
projects and polices that improve regional mobility. [2000 GP Objective
CIR-1A – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐3.8: Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions to maintain or improve mobility within the
City to achieve a standard Level of Service no worse than “D” at all intersections
under State or joint control. Intersection Level of Service analyses for General
Plan conditions for locations under State or joint control will be updated
periodically and presented to the City Council. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.12]
C‐3.9: Consult with Caltrans and OCTA regarding the I‐405 widening project to
minimize adverse impacts to Costa Mesa’s neighborhoods, businesses, and
streets. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐3.10: Coordinate with OCTA and other jurisdictions to remove Gisler Avenue Bridge
over the Santa Ana River from the City’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways
and County’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.18]
C‐3.11: Collaborate with Caltrans and neighboring jurisdiction to improve signal timing
and coordination along major arterials across jurisdictional boundaries. [2000 GP
Policy CIR-2A.3 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐3.12: Work closely with the State of California and other government agencies to
control traffic–related impacts of uses on State- or other agency-owned land (i.e.,
Orange County Fairgrounds, Orange Coast College, etc.). [2000 GP Policy CIR-
1A.17]
C‐3.13: Coordinate with other responsible agencies the planning, funding, prioritization,
and implementation of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit programs and supporting
infrastructure. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 16
Goal C‐4:
Promote Transportation Demand Management, Transit, and Efficiency
Utilize Transportation Demand Management strategies to manage demand and maximize available
capacity. [2000 GP Goal CIR-2 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C‐4A: Encourage greater utilization of Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) strategies to reduce dependence on single‐occupancy vehicles.
[2000 GP Objective CIR-2A – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.1: Support South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) trip reduction
programs, including park and ride lots, transit subsidies, carpool and vanpool
programs, flexible working hours, bicycle facilities, and other traffic reduction
strategies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.2: Support local and multi‐jurisdictional car‐sharing and bike‐sharing programs.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.3: Consider implementing park‐once approaches for multiuse districts and regional
destinations areas. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.4: Embrace innovative parking solutions that reduce the required spaced needed
for parking, such as automated parking lifts and elevators. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
C‐4.5: Encourage and provide incentives for commercial, office, and industrial
development to provide preferred parking for carpools, vanpools, electric
vehicles, and flex cars. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.6: Encourage and support programs that increase vehicle occupancy, including the
provision of traveler information, shuttles, preferential parking for
carpools/vanpools, transit pass subsidies, and other methods. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.7: Promote the combination of TDM measures as much more effective than any
single measure. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.8: Require discussion of transportation system management (TSM) and TDM
measures in all EIRs prepared for major projects. [2000 GP Policy Policy CIR-
2D.5]
C‐4.9: Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and housing into major
development projects to reduce vehicle use. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.8]
C‐4.10: Allow the application of transportation management rideshare programs,
integration of complementary land uses, and other methods to reduce project
related average daily and peak hour vehicle trips to achieve consistency with
allocated trip budgets. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.10]
Objective C‐4B: Promote regional and local transit services as an alternative to
automobile travel. [2000 GP Objective CIR-1A – Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
C‐4.11: Ensure that roadways designated as transit routes can accommodate transit
vehicle circulation and convenient pedestrian access to and from transit stops.
[2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.11 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.12: Review all capital improvement projects to ensure improvements located on
existing and planned transit routes include modification of street, curb, and
sidewalk configurations to allow for easier and more efficient transit operations
and improved passenger access. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 17
C‐4.13: Provide transit stop amenities that facilitate access to and from transit stops and
transfer locations. These may include pedestrian pathways approaching stops,
high-quality benches and shelters, traveler information systems (real‐time transit
arrival information), and bike storage and bicycle connections. Bus stops should
accommodate timed transfers between buses and other transit services where
necessary. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.14: Encourage new development along major transit corridors to provide efficient and
safe access to transit stops and public sidewalks. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.15: Support and participate with OCTA ACCESS Service in providing transportation
assistance to senior citizens and the disabled. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.16: Consult with OCTA for transit services, such as changes to bus routes, bus
stops, and hours of operation. Additionally, coordinate with OCTA for changes to
transit services provided for seniors, the disabled, and transit dependent
populations. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.17: Consult with the Newport‐Mesa Unified School District to maintain school bus
services provided for local schoolchildren. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.18: Coordinate with OCTA to improve transit services in the City, including strategies
such as bus rapid transit, express services, community circulators, and other
strategies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐4.19: Encourage new local transit programs in coordination with OCTA, consisting of
shuttle services to local and regional destinations. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
C‐4.20: Coordinate with OCTA to construct bus turnouts at appropriate locations, with
attractive shelters designed for safe and comfortable use. [2000 GP Policy CIR-
2B.1]
C‐4.21: Require discussion of transit service needs and site design amenities for transit
ridership in EIR for major projects. [2000 GP Policy CIR-2D.4]
Goal C‐5:
Ensure Coordination between the Land Use and Circulation Systems
Facilitate close coordination between development of land use and circulation system. [2000 GP Goal
CIR-2 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C‐5A: Coordinate land use policies and development activities that support a
sustainable transportation system. [2000 GP Objective CIR-1A –
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐5.1: Ensure that new development projects are consistent with the vehicular trip
budgets, where adopted. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐5.2: Require that large developments and redevelopments provide short‐term and
long‐term vehicular traffic impact studies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐5.3: Encourage permitted General Plan land uses which generate high traffic volumes
to be located near major transit and transportation corridors to minimize vehicle
use, congestion, and delay. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.9]
C‐5.4: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by phasing new
developments to levels that can be accommodated by roadways existing or
planned to exist at the time of completion of each phase of the project. [2000 GP
Policy GM-1A.2 and Policy CIR-1A.16]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 18
C‐5.5: Promote development of mixed-use projects to reduce number of vehicle trips.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐5.6: Coordinate the design and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle ways in major
residential, shopping and employment centers, parks, schools, other public
facilities, public transportation facilities, and bicycle networks with adjacent cities.
[2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.3]
C‐5.7: Require dedication of right-of-way, in an equitable manner, for development that
increases the intensity of land use. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.6]
C‐5.8: Minimize circulation improvements that will necessitate the taking of private
property on existing developed properties. [2000 GP Policy CIR-1A.19]
C‐5.9: Require that circulation necessary to provide or attain the minimum traffic level of
service standard at an intersection to which a development project contributes
measureable traffic be completed within three years of issuance of the first
building permit for such development project, unless additional right-of-way or
coordination with other government agencies is required to complete the
improvement. Improvements may be required sooner if, because of extraordinary
traffic generation characteristics of the project or extraordinary impacts to the
surrounding circulation system, such improvements are necessary to prevent
significant adverse impacts. [2000 GP Policy CIR-2D.1]
C‐5.10: Allow for construction of circulation improvements for a phased development
project to be constructed commensurate with the project construction, based
upon the findings of a traffic study approved by the City of Costa Mesa. [2000 GP
Policy CIR-2D.2]
C‐5.11: Maintain balance between land use and circulation systems by phasing new
development to levels that can be accommodated by roadways existing or
planned to exist at the time of completion of each phase of the project. [2000 GP
Policy GM-1A.2 and Policy CIR-1A.16]
C‐5.12: Support consistency with the Orange County Sustainable Communities Strategy
(OC SCS) and SCAG RTP/SCS by providing an integrated land use and
transportation plan to meet mandated emissions reduction targets consistent with
SB 375. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C‐5B: Establish strategies and processes that allow large developments to
analyze and mitigate traffic impacts and infrastructure needs. [2000 GP
Objective CIR-2D – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐5.13: Require that new development projects improve access to and accommodations
for multimodal transportation. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐5.14: Require developers of new building and redevelopment/reuse projects as part of
the project development review process that are located along bus routes to pay
a designated fair share of the cost of providing improved bus stop facilities and
related street furniture or, where appropriate, dedicate land for improved bus stop
facilities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐5.15: Consider the needs of the transportation and infrastructure system early for large
developments and coordinate with developers to design projects that minimize
traffic impacts and infrastructure demands, and implement complete streets
wherever feasible. Alternatively, address transportation and infrastructure system
impacts through the implementation of development agreements. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 19
Goal C‐6:
Fund and Evaluate the City’s Transportation Network
Explore opportunities to secure funding for enhancing the circulation system. [New Goal for 2015-2035
GP]
Objective C‐6A: Pursue funding sources to maintain and enhance the transportation and
infrastructure system. [2000 GP Objective CIR-2C – Modified for 2015-
2035 GP]
C‐6.1: Evaluate traffic collision data regularly, and identify top collision locations for
automobiles, bicycles, pedestrians, transit in Costa Mesa. Develop appropriate
countermeasures and pursue funding from all available sources to implement
them. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.2: Continue to develop and maintain long‐range capital improvement programs
consistent with the General Plan and M2 eligibility requirements. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.3: Coordinate with OCTA to fund, develop, and maintain a Master Plan of Streets
and Highways consistent with the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH).
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.4: Require a locally collected and administered traffic mitigation fee program to
guarantee that new development pays for its fair share toward improvements
resulting in reductions in air pollutant and GHG emissions and traffic impacts
generated by the development. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.5: Actively pursue local, State, and federal funding to implement, maintain, and
evaluate the transportation and infrastructure system. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
C‐6.6: Supplement funding from annual fees or assessments on existing and new
development with grants and other nonlocal sources. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
C‐6.7: Develop strategies to implement an infrastructure and transportation system to
be consistent with State policies on resiliency and sustainability. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.8: Amend the General Plan, if necessary, to be responsive to evolving funding
requirements and to comply with State and federal regulations affecting the goals
and policies of the Circulation Element. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.9: Coordinate with OCTA and Caltrans to seek funding and implementation
solutions to improve Newport Boulevard at the terminus of the State Route 55
freeway to relieve congestion from regional traffic. [2000 GP Policy CIR-2A.1
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.10: Review the City’s transportation impact fee program on a regular basis, and
adjust fees as needed to ensure that funding is available for planned
transportation improvements that will benefit all travel modes. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.11: Prioritize funding and timing for implementing transportation improvements.
Consider prioritizing multimodal projects that provide the most benefit to all
users. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.12: Require that every new development project pay its share of costs associated
with the mitigation of project generated impacts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 20
C‐6.13: Measure M2 sales tax revenues shall not be used to replace private funding
which has been committed for any project. [2000 GP Policy GM-1A.5 – Modified
for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.14: The City’s seven-year capital improvement program shall be adopted and
maintained in conformance with the provisions of Measure M2 for the purpose of
maintaining the established level of service standard. [2000 GP Policy GM-1A.6
– Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.15: Maintain a traffic impact fee for circulation system improvements to the Master
Plan of Streets and Highways; review and update fees on a regular basis. [2000
GP Policy GM-1A.4 AND Policy CIR-2D.3 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C‐6B: Evaluate the transportation system to ensure that it meets the City’s
circulation goals. [2000 GP Objective CIR-2A – Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
C‐6.16: Provide an annual Capital Improvement Program General Plan consistency
report. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.17: Provide annual public review of implementation status reports of goals, policies,
and objectives stated in the Circulation Element. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
C‐6.18: Adopt and seek out methods and processes that provide appropriate and
accurate data for evaluating the performance of the transportation and
infrastructure system. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal C-7:
Promote a Friendly Active Transportation System in Costa Mesa
Create a bicycle and pedestrian friendly environment throughout Costa Mesa for all types of users and
all trip purposes in accordance with the five “Es:” Education, Encouragement, Enforcement,
Engineering, and Evaluation. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
The following recommendations are aimed at providing the maximum flexibility in meeting the goals and
policies in this Circulation Element.
Bikeways and Pedestrian Paths
Objective C-7A: Expand, enhance, and protect the existing bicycle and pedestrian
network to provide a comprehensive, system of Class I, Class II, Class
III, and Class IV facilities to increase connectivity between homes, jobs,
schools transit, and recreational resources in Costa Mesa. [New
Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.1: Develop an extensive bicycle and pedestrian backbone
network through the use of standard and appropriate
innovative treatments. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.2: Plan and install new bicycle lanes on Major Arterials,
where feasible and appropriate. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.3: Plan and install shared lane markings (“sharrows”) and
signage on appropriate existing and planned bicycle
routes where bicycle lane implementation is demonstrated
to be infeasible. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.4: Where feasible, Class I shared-use paths should be a
priority for future developments. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 21
Recommendation C-7.5: Plan and install new shared-use paths in utility corridors
and/or along flood control channels, and extend existing
bicycle and shared-use paths. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-7.6: Plan and complete north/south multi-purpose and bicycle
routes through the City to augment the east/west route.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.7: Consider the identification and feasibility of potential Class
IV cycle tracks. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.8: When feasible, implement the completion through regional
coordination of the Costa Mesa roadway and trail
segments of regional bikeway plans. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.9: Encourage reallocation of roadway rights-of-way where
appropriate to accommodate shared-use path and bicycle
facilities, while preserving and respecting the character of
each adjacent neighborhood. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-7.10: Support bicycle improvement projects that close gaps in
the regional bicycle network either by implementing
specific projects recommended in the Plan or through
other treatments. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.11: Encourage bicycle projects that connect local facilities and
neighborhoods to major bicycle corridors. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.12: Work cooperatively with adjoining jurisdictions and
local/regional agencies to coordinate bicycle planning, and
implementation activities. Where required, develop
consistent active transportation plans and policies with
regional and adjacent agencies. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.13: Prioritize safe access to major regional trails such as the
OC Loop/Santa Ana River Trail and the Newport Back Bay
Trail System. Where feasible, plan and provide a
continuous low-stress Class I and/or Class IV facility from
east to west across the city between these facilities. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.14: Explore favorable opportunities to remove parking to
accommodate bicycle lanes. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-7.15: Identify favorable opportunities to retain parallel parking
adjacent to sidewalks to maintain pedestrian safety. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.16: Consider every street in Costa Mesa as a street that
cyclists could use. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.17: Link on-road and off-road bicycle and pedestrian facilities
within Costa Mesa to existing and planned facilities in
adjacent and regional jurisdictions. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 22
Recommendation C-7.18: Low-stress design techniques should be considered where
necessary to attract a wide variety of users. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.19: Establish designated safe routes to schools for biking and
walking. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.20: Designate walkable districts in the City. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Bike and Pedestrian Facilities
Objective C-7B: Provide end-of-trip facilities that support the bicycle network. [New
Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.21: Provide bike parking and bike-related amenities at public
facilities and along public rights-of-way. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.22: Pursue public-private partnerships to furnish local
businesses with secure bike parking and other related
amenities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.23: Develop and adopt bicycle parking equipment standards
for bicycle parking to be installed within the public right-of-
way and post on the City website. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.24: Work with local schools and colleges to provide ample and
secure bike parking and other related amenities for
students and employees. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.25: Work with OCTA to maximize bicycle amenities, such as
bus stop solar lighting and bicycle lockers, at high-volume
transit stops. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.26: Prioritize the installation of bicycle-scale and/or
pedestrian-scale lighting. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.27: Encourage and incentivize providing attended bicycle
parking services, such as a bicycle valet, at major City
events, OC Fair, Farmers’ Markets, holiday festivals, and
other community events. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.28: Prioritize schools with the highest auto traffic volume
during peak hours and insufficient parking for staff and
parents. Plan and install bicycle facilities adjacent those
schools. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.29: Provide bike parking and bike-related amenities at public
facilities and along public right-of-way. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 23
“First and Last Mile” Programs
Objective C-7C: Encourage sustainable modes of transportation to fill gaps between the
first and last miles of trips (walking, biking, ride sharing, transit, taxi and
car-sharing). [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.30: Identify citywide infrastructure needed to create the
interconnected multi-trail system. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.31: Improve the quality, aesthetics, and safety of high-use
pedestrian corridors. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.32: Development and implement a bicycle sharing system.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.33: Proposed new mode split goals:
• 50 percent motor vehicles
• 10 percent transit
• 10 percent bicycles
• 20 percent walking
• 10 percent carpools, taxi, transportation network
company services, and car sharing [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.34: Establish a goal for all trips of less than three miles to be
30 percent by bicycle, and establish a goal of less than 1
mile to be 30 percent by walking. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-7.35: Consider implementing a small-scale transportation
system to encourage mode shift to popular destinations as
defined by users. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal C-8:
Create a Safer Place to Walk and Ride a Bicycle
Provide a safe, convenient, and attractive bicycling and pedestrian environment. Apply design
standards, enforcement of traffic laws, maintenance practices, and safety awareness campaigns to
encourage and increate the use of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Design and Way-finding
Objective C-8A: Develop bicycle and pedestrian facilities with approved uniform design
standards, and implementation of way-finding signage providing
information on various destinations. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.1: Require that all facilities be designed in accordance with
the latest federal, state, and local standards. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.2: Provide and maintain bicycle and pedestrian signal
detectors, informational signage, and lighting, along City
bikeways. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 24
Recommendation C-8.3: Develop, install and maintain a bicycle and pedestrian
way-finding signage program to indicate route turns, the
presence of intersecting bikeways, streets and distances
to nearby local and major destinations. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.4: Develop a list of acceptable plant materials for shared use
paths that will not damage, create security problems or
hazards for bicyclists. Incorporate canopy trees and
native, drought-tolerant landscaping as a standard Class I
facility (shared use path) feature. Encourage the use of
sustainable drainage designs, such as bio-swales. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.5: Utilize Complete Streets elements as demonstrated in
most recent versions of National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Street Design
Guide and Bikeway Design Guide. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.6: Crosswalks will include high visibility crossing treatments.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.7: Paint direction arrows on all bike lanes and bike paths to
reduce the risk of collisions. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Safety Enforcement and Reporting
Objective C-8B: Continue and expand enforcement activities that enhance safety of
bicyclists on bike paths and roadways. [New Objective for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-8.8: Enforce laws that reduce bicycle/pedestrian/motor vehicle
incidents and conflicts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.9: Train police officers on bicyclists’ rights and
responsibilities and bicycle/pedestrian/vehicle collision
evaluation. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.10: Utilize the City’s bicycle-mounted patrol officer program to
educate and enforce pedestrian and bicycle user
violations not necessarily to punish, but to correct. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.11: Promote efficient reporting mechanisms for behaviors that
endanger cyclists and pedestrians. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.12: Develop a partnership with the school community to
establish and update suggested routes to schools for
biking and walking. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Safe Roadway Conditions
Objective C-8C: Maintain bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are clear of debris and
provide safe conditions for all users. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.13: Establish routine maintenance schedule/standards for
bicycle and pedestrian facilities such as sweeping, litter
removal, landscaping, repainting of striping, signage, and
signal actuation devices. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 25
Recommendation C-8.14: Encourage and empower citizens to report maintenance
issues that impact bicyclist and pedestrian safety
including, but not limited to, potholes, sidewalk lifting, and
overgrown vegetation. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.15: Establish procedures for responding to citizen reports in a
timely manner. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.16: Where feasible, reduce or eliminate conflict points such as
driveways that cross the sidewalk. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Safety Education
Objective C-8D: Increase education of bicycle and pedestrian safety through programs
and training of school children and the public. [New Objective for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.17: Create, fund, and implement bicycle-safety curricula and
provide to the public, tourists, various ethnic groups,
diverse ages and disadvantaged communities. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.18: Provide multilingual bicycle-safety maps and brochures
(print and electronic versions) in languages that are widely
used in Costa Mesa. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.19: Encourage schools to develop and provide bicycle-safety
curricula for use in elementary, middle, and high schools,
such as the Bicycle Rodeo events. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.20: Support marketing and public awareness campaigns
aimed at improving bicycle and pedestrian safety. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.21: Provide a user education program developed and
promoted to encourage proper trail use and etiquette.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.22: Work with local bicycle advocacy organizations to develop,
promote and support a series of bicycle education classes.
Include information on bicycle safety, maintenance, and
security. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.23: Develop and distribute education material regarding
bicycle and pedestrian responsibilities and laws. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Safety Data
Objective C-8E: Monitor and analyze bicycle and pedestrian safety. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.24: Request bicycle and pedestrian collision reports from local
law enforcement periodically and consider improvements
to address problem areas. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 26
Recommendation C-8.25: Establish an expedited process to report maintenance and
safety concerns, e.g. pavement markings (sharrows,
missing bike lane lines), ramps, curb cut-outs, broken
walk/bike signal buttons, signage, minor maintenance of
bike lanes/paths (street/path sweeping, minor surface
patching, inoperable traffic signal bicycle detection). [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-8.26: Conduct Roadside Safety Audits (RSAs) on a regular
basis to provide periodic snapshots of roadway safety,
including bicycle, pedestrian, equestrian, skateboard, and
other non-motorized modes of travel. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Goal C-9:
Integrate Active Transportation Elements into Circulation System and Land Use Planning
Provide bikeway and walkway facilities that are integrated with other transportation systems and land
use planning decisions. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Land Use Planning Decisions and Active Transportation
Objective C-9A: Consider bicycle and pedestrian facilities during land use planning
process. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.1: Incorporate the Costa Mesa Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan into the City’s General Plan. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.2: Ensure that all current and proposed land use planning is
consistent with the Costa Mesa Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.3: Require new developments provide adequate bicycle
parking and pedestrian access. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-9.4: Collaborate with property owners to increase bicycle
parking over time. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.5: Encourage the integration of compatible land uses and
housing into major development projects to reduce vehicle
use. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.6: Provide a fully integrated network of modern active
transportation facilities to and from major activity centers
and residential centers. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.7: Identify areas where an increase in the need for active
transportation can reasonably be anticipated due to
housing/business growth. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.8: Make commercial and recreational areas more enjoyable
for pedestrians by implementing measures such as
providing shade, planting trees, eliminating visible parking
lots and vacant land, and minimizing long stretches of
building façade. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.9: Develop creative, artistic, and functional bicycle parking
solutions, and install them throughout the City as a
standard. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 27
Active Transportation in Developments
Objective C-9B: Integrate bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements during planning,
design and implementation of transportation projects. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.10: Promote the preservation of bicycle access within all
roadway rights-of-way, as well as the development of
innovative, safety-enhanced on-street facilities, such as
bicycle boulevards and cycle tracks. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.11: Establish bike boulevards on streets with low traffic
volumes and slow speeds to encourage bicycling. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.12: Proactively seek new opportunities for acquisition of
abandoned rights-of-way and other lands for the
development of new multi-use pathways that integrate with
the planned network. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.13: Improve the safety of all road users through the
implementation of neighborhood traffic-calming
treatments. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.14 Detours through or around construction zones should be
designed for safety and convenience, and with adequate
signage for cyclists and pedestrians. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-9.15: Provide opportunity for public input prior to the removal of
an existing bicycle or pedestrian facility or the approval of
any development or street improvement that would
preclude these planned facilities. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Goal C-10:
Promote an Active Transportation Culture
Develop educational and promotional programs to increase bicycle and pedestrian usage that respects
and accommodates all users to foster a more balanced transportation system. [New Goal for 2015-2035
GP]
An Active Transportation Culture
Objective C-10A: Encourage more people to walk and bicycle by supporting programs
that foster community support for bicycling and walking, and raise public
awareness about active transportation. [New Objective for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-10.1: Support marketing and public awareness campaigns
through a variety of media aimed at promoting bicycling
and walking as a safe, healthy, cost-effective,
environmentally friendly transportation choice. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.2: Support programs aimed at increasing bicycle and walk
trips by providing incentives, recognition, or services that
make bicycling and walking a more convenient
transportation mode. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 28
Recommendation C-10.3: Promote bicycling and walking at City-sponsored and
public events, such as Earth Day, Bike to Work
Day/Month, farmers’ markets, public health fairs, art walks,
craft fairs, and civic events. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-10.4: Encourage and promote bicycle related businesses within
Costa Mesa including, but not limited to, involvement of
civic clubs and organizations. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Recommendation C-10.5: Promote active transportation events in Costa Mesa to
raise awareness and encourage bicycling, including, but
not limited to, those that may involve temporary road
closures, bike to work/school, senior walks, historic walks,
and ciclovías. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.6: Encourage major employment centers and employers to
promote commuting by bicycle including the use of flex-
time work schedules to support non-rush bicycle
commuting. Build a coalition with City, businesses,
schools, and residents to promote active transportation.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.7: Encourage participation in bicycle and pedestrian
promotion activities by education facilities, arts programs,
active transportation clubs, and entertainment providers.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.8: Achieve “Silver Level Bicycle Friendly Community” by
League of American Bicyclists by 2025. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.9: Achieve “Walk Friendly Community” status from
WalkFriendly.org by 2025. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-10.10: Achieve “HEAL City” designation by 2017. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Goal C-11:
Promote the Positive Air Quality, Health, and Economic Benefits of Active Transportation
Encourage active transportation by promoting air quality, health, and economic benefits, and by
pursuing multiple sources of funding for active transportation programs and facilities. [New Goal for
2015-2035 GP]
Improving the Environment with Active Transportation
Objective C-11A: Improve air quality and public health and reduce ambient noise by
promoting Active Transportation programs. [New Objective for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.1: Determine baseline emissions levels, then track and
communicate changes in emissions as modes of
transportation trips shift to encourage more walking and
biking. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.2: Improve the quality of life in Costa Mesa by reducing
neighborhood traffic and noise. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 29
Recommendation C-11.3: Increase pedestrian and bicycle trips, thereby reducing
vehicle trips and vehicle miles Traveled. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.4: Coordinate with appropriate federal, state, and county
health agencies on active transportation programs to
achieve health benefits. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Economic and Other Incentives
Objective C-11B: Provide economic incentives for expanding and enhancing bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.5: Incentivize the business community to support pedestrians
and bicycle users in tangible ways. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.6: Partner with the business and school communities to
create a marketing strategy to encourage individual
businesses to market Costa Mesa as a bicycle-friendly
City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.7: Encourage developers to include features, amenities and
programs that are proven to increase walking and/or
bicycling. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.8: Offer incentives for businesses whose employees walk or
bike to work. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-11.9: Encourage the Chamber of Commerce and the business
community to promote active transportation in commercial
areas to stimulate economic vitality. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
Goal C-12:
Monitor, Evaluate, and Pursue Funding for Implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
[New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective C-12A: Continuously monitor and evaluate Costa Mesa’s implementation
progress on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan policies, programs,
and projects. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.1: Establish a monitoring program to measure the
effectiveness and benefits of the Costa Mesa Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.2: Track citywide trends in active transportation through the
use of Census data, bicycle and pedestrian counts, travel
surveys, and online surveys as part of annual reviews of
the General Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.3: Ensure that Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan programs
and projects are implemented in an equitable manner
geographically, socioeconomically, and serving
disadvantaged communities. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 30
Fund the Plans
Objective C-12B: Pursue grants and other sources of funding for bicycle and pedestrian
projects. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.4: Strategize use of resources on developing effective and
efficient grant application and program administration.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.5: Pursue multiple sources of funding and support efforts to
maintain or increase federal, state and local funding for
the implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Recommendation C-12.6: Consider designating a portion of development traffic
impact fees to fund bicycle and pedestrian facilities. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 31
Growth Management Elements
The goals, objectives, and policies that address growth management are as follows:
Goal GM-1:
Inter-jurisdictional Coordination [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective GM-1A: Coordinate land use and transportation planning policies with State,
regional, and local growth management efforts. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
GM-1.1: Cooperate with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and other
jurisdictions on development, all future regional transportation plans, and land
use planning on a countywide basis. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM-1.2: Coordinate population, housing, and employment projections with the State
Department of Finance, Southern California Association of Governments, Center
for Demographic Research, Newport-Mesa Unified School District, and County of
Orange agencies in terms of infrastructure planning. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
GM-1.3: Work with inter-jurisdictional forums such as the City-County Coordinating
Committee to make sure that the City's fees are consistent with minimally
acceptable impact fees in the region. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM-1.4: Participate in inter-jurisdictional planning forums to discuss implementation of
traffic improvements, cooperative land use planning, and appropriate mitigation
measures for developments with multijurisdictional impacts. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
GM-1.5: Continue to require that any new large developments prepare a master plan and
environmental impact analysis. This allows the City to anticipate the impacts of
large projects prior to development of any portion and permits more time to plan
for public services and facilities needed to support the project. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Goal GM-2:
Integration of Land Use and Transportation Planning [2000 GP Goal GM-1 – Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
Objective GM-2A: Maintain the Level of Service standards by integration of land use and
transportation planning. [2000 GP Objective GM-1A – Modified for
2015-2035 GP]
GM-2.1: Ensure that land use designations are reflected in the sub-regional county
model and SCAG’s model through consistent assumptions and methodologies.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM-2.2: Coordinate with State, county, and local agencies for planning and construction
of public utilities to minimize negative impacts on the circulation system. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM-2.3: Use the Development Phasing and Performance Monitoring Program to assess
the impact of existing and new development on the circulation system. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM-2.4: Support uses and development which create synergistic relationships with
neighboring uses and development, especially those whose addition does not
create mutually exclusive additional vehicular trips but adds to the value of the
destination by any potential visitor. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GM-2.5: Support creative and flexible solutions that provide for additional economic or
physical growth within the City but does not place greater impact on the
circulation system. These would include shared parking agreements, offset hours
of operation, and clustering of harmonious and supportive uses. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 32
Housing Element
The goals and policies, from the adopted 2013-2021 Housing Element, that address housing are as
follows:
Goal HOU-1:
Preservation and Enhancement
Preserve the availability of existing housing opportunities and conserve as well as enhance the quality
of existing dwelling units and residential neighborhoods. [No Change]
HOU-1.1: Develop standard and/or guidelines for new development with emphasis on site
(including minimum site security lighting) and building design to minimize
vulnerability to criminal activity. [No Change]
HOU-1.2: Encourage existing stabilized residential neighborhoods, including but not limited
to mobile home parks and manufactured home parks, from the encroachment of
incompatible or potentially disruptive land uses and/or activities. [No Change]
HOU-1.3: Actively enforce existing regulations regarding derelict or abandoned vehicles,
outdoor storage, and substandard or illegal building and establish regulations to
abate weed-filled yards when any of the above is deemed to constitute a health,
safety or fire hazard. [No Change]
HOU-1.4: Establish code enforcement as a high priority and provide adequate funding and
staffing to support code enforcement programs. [No Change]
HOU-1.5: Install and upgrade public service facilities (streets, alleys, and utilities) to
encourage increased private market investments in declining or deteriorating
neighborhoods. [No Change]
HOU-1.6: Continue existing rehabilitation loan and grant programs for low and moderate-
income homeowners as long as funds are available. [No Change]
HOU-1.7: Minimize the displacement of existing residences due to public projects. [No
Change]
HOU-1.8: Encourage the development of housing that fulfills specialized needs. [No
Change]
Goal HOU-2:
Preserving and Expanding Affordable Housing Opportunities
Provide a range of housing choices for all social and economic segments of the community, including
housing for persons with special needs.
HOU-2.1: Encourage concurrent applications (i.e., rezones, tentative tract maps,
conditional use permits, variance request, etc.) if multiple approvals are required,
and if consistent with applicable processing requirements. [No Change]
HOU-2.2: Promote the use of State density bonus provisions to encourage the
development of affordable housing for lower and moderate income households,
as well as senior housing. [No Change]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 33
HOU-2.3: Provide incentive bonus units to encourage the redevelopment of residential
units that are nonconforming in terms of density. The incentive shall be limited to
the multi-family residential land use designations. The density incentive shall be
limited to an increase of 25 percent above the Medium-Density or an increase of
50 percent above High-Density. In no case shall the resulting number of units
exceed the existing number of units on each site. [No Change]
HOU-2.4: Encourage developers to employ innovative or alternative construction methods
to reduce housing costs and increase housing supply. [No Change]
HOU-2.5: Continue membership in the Orange County Housing Authority to provide rental
assistance to very low income households. [No Change]
HOU-2.6: Provide clear rules, policies, and procedures, for reasonable accommodation in
order to promote equal access to housing. Policies and procedures should be
ministerial and include but not be limited to identifying who may request a
reasonable accommodation (i.e., persons with disabilities, family-members,
landlords, etc.), timeframes for decision-making, and provisions for relief from the
various land-use, zoning, or building regulations that ma constrain the housing
for persons of disabilities. [No Change]
HOU-2.7: Monitor the implementation of the City’s ordinances, codes, policies, and
procedures to ensure they comply with the “reasonable accommodation” for
disable provisions and all fair housing laws. [No Change]
Goal HOU-3:
Provisions of Adequate Sites
Provide adequate, suitable sites for residential use and development or maintenance of a range of
housing that varies sufficiently in terms of cost, design, size, location, and tenure to meet the housing
needs of all segment of the community at a level that can be supported by infrastructure. [No Change]
HOU-3.1: Encourage the conversion of existing marginal or vacant motels, commercial,
and/or industrial land to residential, where feasible and consistent with
environmental conditions that are suitable for new residential development. [No
Change]
HOU-3.2: Provide opportunities for the development of well planned and designed project
which, through vertical or horizontal integration, provide for the development of
compatible residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or public uses within a
single project or neighborhood. [No Change]
HOU-3.3: Cooperate with large employers, the Chamber of Commerce, and major
commercial and industrial developers to identify and implement programs to
balance employment growth with the ability to provide housing opportunities
affordable to the incomes of the newly created job opportunities. [No Change]
HOU-3.4: Consider the potential impact on housing opportunities and existing residential
neighborhoods when reviewing rezone petitions affecting residential properties.
[No Change]
HOU-3.5: Encourage transit-oriented development along transportation corridors. [No
Change]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 34
Goal HOU-4:
Equal Housing Opportunity
Ensure that all existing and future housing opportunities are open and available to all social and
economic segments of the community without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex,
sexual orientation, disability/medical conditions, national origin or ancestry, marital status, age,
household composition or size, source of income, or any other arbitrary factors. [No Change]
HOU-4.1: Support the intent and spirit of equal housing opportunities as express in Federal
and State fair housing laws. [No Change]
HOU-4.2: Continue to provide fair housing and counseling services for all Costa Mesa
residents in an effort to remove barriers and promote access to affordable
housing in the City. [No Change]
HOU-4.3: Encourage programs that address the housing needs of senior citizens. [No
Change]
HOU-4.4: Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and preservation of
residential developments which will meet the needs of families and individuals
with specialized housing requirements. [No Change]
HOU-4.5: Encourage and support the construction, maintenance and preservation of
residential developments to meet the needs of the developmentally disabled. [No
Change]
Goal HOU-5:
Coordination and Cooperation
Coordinate local housing efforts with appropriate federal, state, regional, and local governments and/or
agencies and to cooperate in the implementation of intergovernmental housing programs to ensure
maximum effectiveness in solving local and regional housing problems. [No Change]
HOU-5.1: Investigate alternative intergovernmental arrangements and program options to
deal with area-wide housing issues and problems. [No Change]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 35
Conservation Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address conservation are as follows:
Goal CON-1:
Preserved and Restored Natural Coastal Habitat and Landforms
It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide residents with a high-quality environment through the
conservation of resources, including land, water, wildlife, and vegetation; and the protection of areas of
unique natural beauty. [2000 GP Goal CON-1]
Objective CON-1.A: Evaluate existing biotic resources and preserve them in ecologically
viable and natural conditions, where possible; and/or restore and
integrate these resources into the urban environment, where feasible.
[2000 GP Objective CON-1A]
Habitat and Biological Resources Protection and Restoration
CON-1.A.1: Natural habitat is essential to ensuring biodiversity and protecting sensitive
biological resources. Protect these areas and consult with the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife, Orange County Water District, Orange
County Parks, and other regional agencies to identify areas for special
protection, and establish appropriate protection measures for these areas.
[2000 GP Policy CON-1A.1 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-1.A.2: Contribute to regional biodiversity and the preservation of rare, unique, and
sensitive biological resources by maintaining functional wildlife corridors and
habitat linkages. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-1.A.3: Coordinate with the United States Fish and Wildlife service, the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other regulatory agencies to mitigate
project impacts affecting open and natural spaces. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
CON-1.A.4: Promote and protect native plant species within Fairview Park, and remove
and control the spread of invasive species, including plants, animals, and
fungi. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-1.A.5: Ensure that all future development is reviewed with regard to protecting
natural topography and bluffs to preserve and enhance Costa Mesa’s natural
beauty. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-1.A.6: Minimize soil depletion and erosion in development projects. Prevent erosion
caused by construction activities, and encourage preservation of natural
vegetation and topography. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Access to Large-Scale Natural Areas
CON-1.A.7: Improve access to large-scale natural areas in the City. These areas should
be open for controlled access to improve public enjoyment. Access should
be limited where natural habitat is extremely sensitive. Work with transit
agencies to improve connections and access to open space and recreation
facilities from all Costa Mesa neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-1.A.8: Require the provision of adequate visitor-serving on-site parking facilities
that do no impact sensitive resources within the Coastal Zone. [2000 GP
Policy CON-1D.4]
CON-1.A.9: Coordinate the development of plans, policies, and design standards for
projects within the Coastal Zone with appropriate local, regional, and federal
agencies. [2000 GP Policy CON-1D.5]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 36
Goal CON-2:
Conserved Natural Resources through Environmental Sustainability
Reduce the City’s carbon footprints and manage resources wisely to meet the needs of a growing
population and economy. Base community planning decisions on sustainable practices that reduce
environmental pollutants, conserve resources, and minimize waste. Encourage the design of energy-
efficient buildings, use renewable energy, and promote alternative methods of transportation. [2000 GP
Goal CON-1]
Objective CON-2.A: Work to conserve energy resources in existing and new buildings,
utilities, and infrastructure. [2000 GP Objective CON-1C]
Energy Efficiency and Conservation
CON-2.A.1: Promote efficient use of energy and conservation of available resources in
the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of public and private
facilities, infrastructure, and equipment. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-2.A.2: Consult with regional agencies and utility companies to pursue energy
efficiency goals. Expand renewable energy strategies to reach zero net
energy for both residential and commercial new construction. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CON-2.A.3: Continue to develop partnerships with participating jurisdictions to promote
energy efficiency, energy conservation, and renewable energy resource
development by leveraging the abilities of local governments to strengthen
and reinforce the capacity of energy efficiency efforts. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
CON-2.A.4: Encourage new development to take advantage of Costa Mesa’s optimal
climate in the warming and cooling of buildings, including use of heating,
ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Green Building Sustainable Development Practices
CON-2.A.5: Promote environmentally sustainable development principles for buildings,
master planned communities, neighborhoods, and infrastructure. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-2.A.6: Encourage construction and building development practices that reduce
resource expenditures throughout the lifecycle of a structure. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CON-2.A.7: Continue to require all City facilities and services to incorporate energy and
resource conservation standards and practices and require that new
municipal facilities be built within the LEED Gold standards or equivalent.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-2.A.8: Continue City green initiatives in purchases of equipment, and agreements
that favor sustainable products and practices. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
Solid Waste Reduction and Recycling
CON-2.A.9 Encourage waste management programs that promote waste reduction and
recycling to minimize materials sent to landfills. Maintain robust programs
encourage residents and businesses to reduce, reuse, recycle, and
compost. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 37
CON-2.A.10 Support waste management practices that provide recycling programs.
Promote organic recycling, landfill diversion, zero waste goals, proper
hazardous waste collections, composting, and the continuance of recycling
centers. [2000 GP Policy CON-1B.4 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-2.A.11 Continue construction and demolition programs that require recycling and
minimize waste in haul trips. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CON-3:
Improved Water Supply and Quality
Pursue a multijurisdictional approach to protecting, maintaining, and improving water quality and the
overall health of the watershed. A comprehensive, integrated approach will ensure compliance with
federal and State standards, and will address a range of interconnected priorities, including water
quality and runoff; stormwater capture, storage, and flood management techniques that focus on natural
drainage; natural filtration and groundwater recharge through green infrastructure and habitat
restoration; and water recycling and conservation. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective CON-3.A: Work towards the protection and conservation of existing and future
water resources by recognizing water as a limited resource that requires
conservation. [2000 GP Objective CON-1B]
Water Supply
CON-3.A.1: Continue to consult with local water districts and the Orange County Water
District to ensure reliable, adequate, and high-quality sources of water
supply at a reasonable cost. [2000 GP Policy CON-1B.3 – Modified for 2015-
2035 GP]
Water Conservation
CON-3.A.2: Encourage residents, public facilities, businesses, and industry to minimize
water consumption, especially during drought years. [2000 GP Policy CON-
1B.3 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-3.A.3: Restrict use of turf in new construction and landscape reinstallation that
requires high irrigation demands, except for area parks and schools, and
encourage the use of drought-tolerant landscaping. [2000 GP Policy 1A.2 –
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Water Recycling
CON-3.A.4: Consult with local water districts and the Orange County Water District to
advance water recycling program for new and existing developments,
including the use of treated wastewater to irrigate parks, golf courses,
roadway landscaping, and other intensive irrigation consumers. [2000 GP
Policy CON-1B.2 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Water Quality and Urban Runoff
CON-3.A.5: Work with public and private property owners to reduce stormwater runoff in
urban areas to protect water quality in storm drainage channels, the Santa
Ana River, and other local water courses that lead to the Pacific Ocean.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-3.A.6: Continue to develop strategies to promote stormwater management
techniques and storm drain diversion programs that collectively and naturally
filter urban runoff. [2000 GP Policy CON-1E.5 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-3.A.7: Continue to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Program (NPDES) by participating in the Countywide Drainage Area
Management Plan (DAMP), which stipulates water quality requirements for
minimizing urban runoff and discharge from new development and requires
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 38
the provisions of applicable Best Management Practices (BMP). [2000 GP
Policy CON-1A.3]
CON-3.A.8: Require that all applicable development projects be reviewed with regards to
requirements of both the on-site Water Quality Management Plan and State
requirements for runoff and obtaining a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) permit. [2000 GP Policy CON-1E.6 – Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
Municipal Sewer System
CON-3.A.9: Continue to consult with the Costa Mesa Sanitation District and the Orange
County Sanitation District to modernize wastewater treatment facilities to
avoid overflows of untreated sewage. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CON-4:
Improved Air Quality
Take steps to improve and maintain air quality for the benefit of the health and vitality of residents and
the local economy. In alignment with State emissions reduction goals and in cooperation with the South
Coast Air Quality Management District, pursue regional collaboration to reduce emissions from all
sources. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective CON-4.A: Pursue the prevention of the significant deterioration of local and
regional air quality. [2000 GP Objective CON-1E]
Air Quality
CON-4.A.1: Support regional policies and efforts that improve air quality to protect
human and environmental health, and minimize disproportionate impacts on
sensitive population groups. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-4.A.2: Encourage businesses, industries and residents to reduce the impact of
direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of stationary and non-stationary
pollution sources. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-4.A.3: Require that sensitive uses such as schools, childcare centers, parks and
playgrounds, housing, and community gathering places are protected from
adverse impacts of emissions. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-4.A.4: Continue to participate in regional planning efforts with the Southern
California Association of Governments, nearby jurisdictions, and the South
Coast Air Quality Management District to meet or exceed air quality
standards. [2000 GP Policy CON-1E.1]
Climate Change
CON-4.A.5: Encourage compact development, infill development, and a mix of uses that
are in proximity to transit, pedestrian, and bicycling infrastructures. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-4.A.6: Enhance bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support public bus
service, pursuant to the Circulation Element’s goals, objectives, and policies.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-4.A.7: Encourage installation of renewable energy devices for businesses and
facilities and strive to reduce community-wide energy consumption. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CON-4.A.8: Develop long-term, community-wide strategies and programs that work at
the local level to reduce greenhouse gases and Costa Mesa’s “carbon
footprint”. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 39
Noise Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address noise are as follows:
Goal N-1:
Noise Hazards and Conditions
The City of Costa Mesa aims to protect residents, local workers, and property from injury, damage, or
destruction from noise hazards and to work toward improved noise abatement. [2000 GP Goal N-1]
Objective N-1A: Control noise levels within the City for the protection of residential
areas, park areas, and other sensitive land uses from excessive and
unhealthful noise. [2000 GP Objective N-1A]
N-1.1: Enforce the maximum acceptable exterior noise levels for residential areas at 65
CNEL. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.2]
N-1.2: Give full consideration to the existing and projected noise environment when
considering alterations to the City's circulation system and Master Plan of
Highways. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.3]
N-1.3: Encourage Caltrans to construct noise attenuation barriers along I-405, SR-55,
and SR-73 where these freeways adjoin residential and other noise-sensitive
areas. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.4]
N-1.4: Ensure that appropriate site design measures are incorporated into residential
developments, when required by an acoustical study, to obtain appropriate
exterior and interior noise levels.
When necessary, require field testing at the time of project completion to
demonstrate compliance. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.5]
N-1.5: Apply the standards contained in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations
as applicable to the construction of all new dwelling units. [2000 GP Policy CON-
1C.2 and Policy N-1A.6]
N-1.6: Discourage sensitive land uses from locating within the 65 CNEL noise contour
of John Wayne Airport. Should it be deemed by the City as appropriate and/or
necessary for a sensitive land use to locate in the 65 CNEL noise contour,
ensure that appropriate interior noise levels are met and that minimal outdoor
activities are allowed. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.7]
N-1.7: Support alternative methods for the reduction of noise impacts at John Wayne
Airport while continuing to maintain safety and existing limitations on aircraft daily
departures. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.8]
N-1.8: Monitor the noise levels at OC Fair and Event Center and the Pacific
Amphitheater, and continue to monitor the status of legally binding noise levels
on the OC Fair and the Event Center and the Pacific Amphitheater. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 40
Goal N-2:
Noise and Land Use Compatibility
Integrate the known impacts of excessive noise on aspects of land use planning and siting of residential
and non-residential projects. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective N-2A: Plan for the reduction in noise impacts on sensitive receptors and land
uses. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
N-2.1: Require the use of sound walls, berms, interior noise insulation, double-paned
windows, and other noise mitigation measures, as appropriate, in the design of
new residential or other new noise sensitive land uses that are adjacent to
arterials, freeways, or adjacent to industrial or commercial uses. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
N-2.2: Require, as a part of the environmental review process, that full consideration be
given to the existing and projected noise environment. [2000 GP Policy N-1A.1]
N-2.3: Consider alternative noise level standards for mixed-use projects that take into
consideration the interaction of industrial operation noise impacts and the mixed-
use developments planned for the Westside and SoBeca. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
N-2.4: Require that all proposed projects are compatible with adopted noise/land use
compatibility criteria. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
N-2.5: Enforce applicable interior and exterior noise standards. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
N-2.6: Allow a higher exterior noise level standard for infill projects in existing residential
areas adjacent to major arterials if it can be shown that there are no feasible
mechanisms to meet the exterior noise levels. The interior standard of 45 dBA
CNEL shall be enforced for any new residential project. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
N-2.7: Encourage effective site planning in mixed-use areas that provides the optimal
distance between source of excessive sound and residents. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
N-2.8: Require new mixed-use developments to site loading areas, parking lots,
driveways, trash enclosures, mechanical equipment, and other noise sources
away from the residential portion of the development and adjacent established
residential development. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
N-2.9: Limit hours and/or require attenuation of commercial/entertainment operations
adjacent to residential and other noise sensitive uses in order to minimize
excessive noise to these receptors. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 41
Safety Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address safety are as follows:
Goal S-1:
Risk Management of Natural and Human-Caused Disasters
Minimize the risk of injury, loss of life, property damage, and environmental degradation from seismic
activity, geologic hazards, flooding, fire, and hazardous materials. Promote a sustainable approach to
reduce impacts of natural disasters, such as flooding and fire. [2000 GP Goal SAF-1]
Objective S-1A: Work to mitigate and prevent potential adverse consequences of natural
and human-caused disasters. [2000 GP Objective SAF-1A]
Geologic and Seismic Safety
S-1.1: Continue to incorporate geotechnical hazard data into future land use decision-
making, site design, and construction standards. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.1]
S-1.2: Enforce standards, review criteria, and ensure that structures on or adjacent to
bluffs are set back sufficiently to preserve the natural contours and aesthetic
value of the bluff line and to provide sufficient access for fire protection. [2000 GP
Policy SAF-1A.2]
S-1.3: Require geologic surveys of all new development located on or adjacent to bluffs.
[2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.3]
S-1.4: Encourage retrofitting of structures—particularly older buildings—to withstand
earthquake shaking and landslides consistent with State and historical building
codes. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.6 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.5: Enforce applicable building codes relating to the seismic design of structures to
reduce the potential for loss of life and property damage. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
S-1.6: Identify through a study the issue of unreinforced masonry buildings and soft
stories and other structures not meeting earthquake standards in Costa Mesa.
Provide assistance if necessary to unreinforced masonry building owners once
those buildings have been identified. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Liquefaction and Landslides
S-1.7: Continue to implement the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act, which requires sites
within liquefaction hazard areas to be investigated for liquefaction susceptibility
prior to building construction or human occupancy. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.5 –
Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.8: Consider site soils conditions when reviewing projects in areas subject to
liquefaction or slope instability. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.4 – Modified for 2015-
2035 GP]
Localized Flooding
S-1.9: Continue to consult with appropriate local, State, and federal agencies to
maintain the most current flood hazard and floodplain information; use the
information as a basis for project review and to guide development in accordance
with federal, State, and local standards. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.8 – Modified for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 42
S-1.10: Regularly review and update Article 10 - Floodway and Floodplain Districts of the
City’s Municipal Code consistent with federal and State requirements. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.11: Improve and maintain local storm drainage infrastructure in a manner that
reduces flood hazards. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.12: Continue to develop hazard preparedness plans to prepare for large storms that
could bring flooding hazards and other related issues. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.8
– Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.13: Actively promote public education, research, and information dissemination on
flooding hazards. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1A.8 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Tsunami and Sea Level Rise
S-1.14: Minimize flood hazard risks to people, property, and the environment by
addressing potential damage tsunamis and sea level rise. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
S-1.15: Consult with regional agencies and study strategies that employ engineering
defensive methods along the Santa Ana River that limit potential flooding
hazards from sea level rise. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Dam Inundation
S-1.16: Develop emergency response, early warning notification, and evacuation plans
for areas that are within dam inundation areas, where feasible. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Aviation Safety and Protection
S-1.17: Utilize the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) as a planning
resource for evaluation of land use compatibility and land use intensity in areas
affected by airport operations. In particular, future land use decisions within the
Safety/Runway Protection Zone will be evaluated in light of the risk to life and
property associated with aircraft operations. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.18: Comply with Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) and the John Wayne AELUP
requirements relative to Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
S-1.19: Use the Federal Aviation Regulations as a guideline to establish the ultimate
height of structures as defined in FAR Part 77. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-1.20: Minimize hazards to aeronautical operations by ensuring land uses do not emit
excessive glare, light, steam, smoke, dust, or electronic interference in
compliance with FAR regulations and the John Wayne AELUP. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 43
Goal S-2:
High Level of Police and Fire Services and Emergency Preparedness
Provide a high level of security in the community to prevent and reduce crime, and to minimize risks of
fire to people, property, and the environment. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective S-2A: Plan, promote, and demonstrate a readiness to respond and reduce
threats to life and property through traditional and innovative emergency
services and programs. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Crime Prevention and Response
S-2.1: Promote crime prevention strategies and provide a high level of response to
incidents. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.2: Emphasize and prioritize crime prevention strategies, such as pedestrian-scale
lighting in targeted areas. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.3: Timely response to incidents and monitoring areas with high crime rates should
be part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce crime in the community. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Police and Fire Level of Service
S-2.4: Provide a high level of police and fire service in the community. Secure adequate
facilities, equipment, and personnel for police and fire. [New Policy for 2015-2035
GP]
S-2.5: Consult with neighboring jurisdictions and partner agencies to respond
appropriately to emergencies and incidents in all parts of the City. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
S-2.6: Require that water supply systems for development are adequate to combat
structural fires in terms of location and minimum required fire-flow pressures.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.7: Require development to contribute its fair share toward funding the provision of
appropriate fire and emergency medical services as determined necessary to
adequately serve the project. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Fire and Medical Servicers
S-2.8: Regularly update regulations that will protect the community from fire hazards.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.9: Emphasize prevention and awareness of fire safety guidelines to minimize risk
and potential damage to life, property, and the environment. In areas designated
by the Costa Mesa Fire Department as having a high fire hazard, ensure
adequate fire equipment, personnel, firebreaks, facilities, water, and access for a
quick and efficient response in any area. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Emergency and Disaster Preparedness
S-2.10: Maintain staff and facilities that will continue to support a coordinated and
effective response to emergencies and natural disasters throughout the City.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.11: Consult with neighboring jurisdictions, local employers, and industries to ensure
that emergency preparedness and disaster response programs equitably serve
all parts of the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 44
S-2.12: Continue to maintain adequate police and fire staffing, facilities, equipment, and
maintenance sufficient to protect the community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Hazardous Materials Operations
S-2.13: Continue to consult with the County of Orange in the implementation of the
Orange County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. [2000 GP Policy SAF-
1B.1]
S-2.14: Ensure that appropriate in-depth environmental analysis is conducted for any
proposed hazardous waste materials treatment, transfer, and/or disposal facility.
[2000 GP Policy SAF-1B.2]
S-2.15: Continue to consult with the County of Orange to identify and inventory all users
of hazardous materials and all hazardous waste generators, and prepare clean-
up action plans for identified disposal sites. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1B.3]
S-2.16: Require the safe production, transportation, handling, use, and disposal of
hazardous materials that may cause air, water, or soil contamination. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.17: Encourage best practices in hazardous waste management, and ensure
consistency with City, County, and federal guidelines, standards, and
requirements. [2000 GP Policy SAF-1B.1 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
S-2.18: Consult with federal, State, and local agencies and law enforcement to prevent
the illegal transportation and disposal of hazardous waste. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 45
Community Design Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address community design are as follows:
PUBLIC REALM FOCUS
Goal CD-1:
Vehicular and Pedestrian Corridors
Strengthen the image of the City as experienced from sidewalks and roadways. [2000 GP Goal CD-1]
Objective CD-1A: Contribute to City beautification by enhancing the visual environment of
Costa Mesa’s vehicular and pedestrian paths and corridors. [2000 GP
Objective CD-1A]
CD-1.1 Implement the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development
Guidelines in all new streetscape corridor and parkway projects. Coordinate with
new development adjacent to public rights-of-ways to integrate landscape
features and design elements consistent with the streetscape standards and
recommendations. [2000 GP Policy CD-1A.1]
CD-1.2 Coordinate street furniture elements (benches, bus shelters, newspaper racks,
trash receptacles, kiosks, etc.) whenever possible. Develop design standards
and guidelines for the street furniture within and adjacent to public rights-of-way
to complement the specific recommendations provided for streets in the City of
Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CD-1.3 Promote treatments for walls and fences and utility cabinets along public rights-
of-way that contribute to an attractive street and sidewalk environment. Require
that new walls and fences complement the style and character of the local district
and adjacent buildings. Newly constructed or reconstructed walls and fences
adjacent to sidewalks and roadways should incorporate architectural treatments
such as pilasters, masonry, or wrought iron, and should integrate tiered plantings
to soften their appearance. [2000 GP Policy CD-1A.3 – Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
CD-1.4 Promote a consistent landscape character along City streets to reinforce the
unique qualities of each corridor and district, including the development of
landscaped medians. Support implementation of the recommended street tree
palette for each City street, as identified in the City of Costa Mesa Streetscape
and Median Development Guidelines. [2000 GP Policy CD-1A.4]
CD-1.5 Encourage electric and communication lines to be placed underground and
electrical substations and telephone facilities to be screened to minimize visual
impacts from sidewalks, streets, and adjacent properties. Support utility
undergrounding through conditions of project approval, preparation of
undergrounding plans, and the formation of assessment districts. [2000 GP
Policy CD-1A.5]
Objective CD-1B: Encourage clear connections between districts within the City. [2000 GP
Objective CD-1B]
CD-1.6 Promote linkages between separate districts using bike trails, pedestrian paths,
common medians or parkway landscaping, and other location-appropriate
physical improvements. Through conditions of approval, public improvement
projects, and other measures, support development of new connections and the
enhancement of existing connections between districts. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 46
Goal CD-2:
Cohesive and Identifiable Districts
Enhance the existing character and strengthen the identity of Costa Mesa’s districts. [2000 GP Goal
CD-2]
Objective CD-2A: Encourage future development and redevelopment to reinforce district
scale, identity, and urban form. [2000 GP Objective CD-2]
CD-2.1 Consider urban design guidelines for each identified district in Costa Mesa that
recognizes, maintains, and enhances the character and identity of each district;
integrate existing specific plans’ policies and design guidelines as applicable.
[2000 GP Policy CD-2.1 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-2.2 Support and seek land uses and development that correspond or enrich our
existing districts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CD-3:
High Quality and Visually Interesting Nodes
Heighten the design quality and visual interest of nodes within Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Goal CD-3]
Objective CD-3A: Create a sense of arrival to Costa Mesa, and develop prominent
community focal points at key nodes within the City. [2000 GP Objective
CD-3]
CD-3.1 Introduce entry monument signs at key gateway locations, as identified in Figure
CD-4. Utilize the standard design specifications for entry signs included in the
City of Costa Mesa Streetscape and Median Development Guidelines. [2000 GP
Policy CD-3.1]
CD-3.2 Reinforce a sense of arrival into the City by promoting architecturally significant
development and significant landscape plantings at key nodes. Undertake a
visioning process to develop specific design guidelines that articulate the desired
character for each node within Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Policy CD-3.2]
CD-3.3 Design and development of entry and internal wayfinding signage to be located
throughout the City in areas that correspond to the existing nodes and districts.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CD-4:
Identifiable and Protected City Landmarks. [2000 GP Goal CD-4]
Objective CD-4A: Promote the maintenance, use, and improvement of landmarks to
enhance the visual image and identity of Costa Mesa. [2000 GP
Objective CD-4]
CD-4.1 Support efforts to introduce new monuments and landmarks, and preserve,
maintain, and improve the condition of Costa Mesa landmarks. [2000 GP Policy
CD-4.1]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 47
Goal CD-5:
Edges
Utilize Costa Mesa’s edges as opportunities to enhance the City’s image along its boundaries. [2000
GP Goal CD-5]
Objective CD-5A: Develop and implement programs that preserve and enhance City
edges. [2000 GP Objective CD-5]
CD-5.1 Preserve and optimize natural views and open spaces in Costa Mesa. [2000 GP
Policy CD-5.1]
CD-5.2 Control the visual impacts of new development on natural views of the coast and
the wetlands. [2000 GP Policy CD-5.2]
CD-5.3 Develop open space corridors and trails along the edges of Costa Mesa where
feasible and connect these trails to existing and potential future trails throughout
the City. [2000 GP Policy CD-5.3]
CD-5.4 Continue to preserve natural open space, including restoration of the natural
areas of Talbert Regional Park. [2000 GP Policy CD-5.4]
CD-5.5 Continue protection of Fairview Park as an open space and recreation area.
[2000 GP Policy CD-5.5]
CD-5.6 Continue to work with Caltrans to improve the design quality of freeway edges.
[2000 GP Policy CD-5.6]
PRIVATE PROPERTY FOCUS
Goal CD-6:
Image
Enhance opportunities for new development and redevelopment to contribute to a positive visual image
for the City of Costa Mesa that is consistent with the district image. [2000 GP Goal CD-6]
Objective CD-6A: Establish development policies and design guidelines that create an
aesthetically pleasing and functional environment. [2000 GP Objective
CD-6]
CD-6.1 Encourage the inclusion of public art and attractive, functional architecture into
new development that will have the effect of promoting Costa Mesa as the “City
of the Arts”. [2000 GP Policy CD-6.1 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-6.2 Encourage the use of creative and well-designed signs that establish a distinctive
image for the City. [2000 GP Policy CD-6.2 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-6.3 Continue to work with Code Enforcement to ensure continued maintenance of
properties and compliance with adopted development standards. [2000 GP
Policy CD-6.3]
Goal CD-7:
Quality Residential
Promote and protect the unique identity of Costa Mesa’s residential neighborhoods. [2000 GP Goal CD-7]
Objective CD-7A: Encourage excellence in architectural design. [2000 GP Objective CD-
7A]
CD-7.1 Ensure that new and remodeled structures are designed in architectural styles
that reflect the City’s eclectic quality, yet are compatible in scale and character
with existing buildings and the natural surroundings within residential
neighborhoods. Continue to update and maintain the Costa Mesa Residential
Guidelines. [2000 GP Policy CD-7.1]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 48
CD-7.2 Preserve the character and scale of Costa Mesa’s established residential
neighborhoods where possible; when new residential development is proposed,
encourage that the new structures are consistent with the prevailing character of
existing development in the immediate vicinity, and that new development does
not have a substantial adverse impact on adjacent areas. [2000 GP Policy CD-
7.2]
Objective CD-7B: Encourage the use of native plant palettes in the creation of landscaping
plans used to establish a sense of place in neighborhood identification
efforts. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-7.3 Ensure that California native plants are used to support the local ecology and
save water. Develop landscaping guidelines that reflect the local community.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CD-8:
Quality Commercial Development
Achieve a high level of design quality for commercial development. [2000 GP Goal CD-8]
Objective CD-8A: Encourage a high level of architectural and site design quality. [2000 GP
Objective CD-8A]
CD-8.1 Require that new and remodeled commercial development be designed to reflect
architectural diversity, yet be compatible with the scale and character of the
district. [2000 GP Policy CD-8A.1 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-8.2 Use distinctive commercial architectural styles to reinforce a positive sense of
place. Commercial architectural design elements and materials must be of high
quality and style as well as suitable for long-term maintenance. Consistent
architectural design should be considered in choosing materials, finishes,
decorative details, color, accent features and include the following elements and
materials appropriate for their context (see Table CD-3: Elements and
Materials): [2000 GP Policy CD-8A.2 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Table CD-3: Elements and Materials
Design Elements Design Materials
• Simple, multi-planed pitched roofs
• Open rafters/tails with large overhangs
• Appearance of “thick” walls
• Courtyards, arcades, and intimate spaces
• Tile details
• Deep-set window and door openings
• Offset wall planes
• Fountains and other unique details
• Building masses with the incorporation of
one and two story architecture
• Sequencing of enclosed space/arches
• Stucco, smooth, sand or light lace
finish
• Wood, as an exposed structural
material
• Clay or concrete roof tiles
• Native fieldstone
• Wood window casements
• Wood, as an accent material
• Brick, as an accent material
• Wrought iron (rust proof; anodized
aluminum)
• Tile, as an accent material
• Slumpstone garden walls
CD-8.3 Encourage the use of entrance patios, courtyards, plazas, arcades, fountains,
porches, tower elements, covered walks, and other features in commercial areas.
Promote pedestrian amenities. [2000 GP Policy CD-8A.3]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 49
CD-8.4 Ensure that common areas, walkways, driveways, and parking spaces be
landscaped consistent with landscaping standards contained in the Planning,
Zoning, and Development Code. Utilize landscaping to provide project amenities
for new and remodeled commercial uses, and to screen parking and equipment
areas. Landscaped areas generally should incorporate planting utilizing a three-
tiered system: 1) grasses and ground covers, 2) shrubs and vines, and 3) trees.
[2000 GP Policy CD-8A.4 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-8.5 Ensure that site access, parking, and circulation for commercial uses are
designed in a logical, safe manner. Parking should not dominate the site in areas
adjacent to street, and should be well landscaped with a clear hierarchy of
circulation. Wherever possible, parking lots should be divided into a series of
connected smaller lots utilizing walkways and raised landscape strips. Parking
lots should also include landscaping that accents the importance of driveways
from the street, frames the major circulation aisles, and highlights pedestrian
pathways. [2000 GP Policy CD-8A.5 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-8.6 Require that areas for outside equipment, trash receptacles, storage, and loading
areas be located in the least conspicuous part of the site. Utility and mechanical
equipment (e.g. electric and gas meters, electrical panels, and junction boxes)
should be concealed from view from public streets, neighboring properties, and
nearby higher buildings. Trash enclosures should be architecturally compatible
with the project. Landscaping should be incorporated into the design of trash
enclosures to deter graffiti. [2000 GP Policy CD-8A.6 – Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
CD-8.7 Encourage decorative paving treatments to be incorporated throughout
commercial developments, including driveway entries, pedestrian walkways,
plazas, and other areas. The design, materials, and colors of decorative paving
treatments (e.g., stamped concrete, stone, brick or granite pavers, exposed
aggregate, or colored concrete) should complement the architectural style of the
primary buildings and make a positive contribution to the aesthetic and function
of the site. [2000 GP Policy CD-8A.7 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-8.8 Require that exterior lighting on commercial properties be consistent with the
architectural style of the commercial building. On each commercial site, all
lighting fixtures should be from the same family of fixtures with respect to design,
materials, color, fixture, and color of light. Lighting sources should be shielded,
diffused or indirect to avoid spillover on adjacent properties, nighttime sky light
pollution, and glare to pedestrians and motorists. To minimize the total number of
freestanding light standards, wall-mounted and pathway lights should be utilized
to the greatest extent possible. [2000 GP Policy CD-8A.8]
Objective CD-8B: Preserve the scale and character of established neighborhoods near
commercial uses. [2000 GP Objective CD-8B]
CD-8.9 Ensure that new commercial development utilize site planning and design
features that optimize compatibility with adjacent residential neighborhoods. The
following guidance should be considered:
• When adjacent residential and nonresidential uses can mutually benefit from
connection, appropriate linkages (e.g., walkways, common landscape areas,
and building orientation) are encouraged. Successful interaction between
commercial and residential uses may be achieved through adequate
setbacks, landscape buffers, screening, decorative masonry walls, berms,
building orientation, and limitations of commercial activities.
• Loading areas, access and circulation driveways, trash and storage areas,
and rooftop equipment should be located as far as possible from adjacent
residences.
• Building orientation and landscaping of commercial buildings should
minimize direct lines of sight into adjacent residential private open space.
[2000 GP Policy CD-8B.1]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 50
Goal CD-9:
Mixed Use
Promote development of mixed-use projects that seamlessly integrate multiple uses both functionally
and aesthetically. [2000 GP Goal CD-9]
Objective CD-9A: Design mixed use development projects to achieve a high quality
character. [2000 GP Objective CD-9A]
CD-9.1 Require that mixed-use development projects be designed to mitigate potential
conflicts between uses. Consider noise, lighting, and security. [2000 GP Policy
CD-9A.1]
CD-9.2 Provide adequate parking, open space and recreational facilities to serve
residents in mixed-use development projects. Design parking and other areas to
acknowledge different users (residents versus shoppers) and to be compatible
with the architectural character of the building(s). [2000 GP Policy CD-9A.2]
Objective CD-9B: Provide for the development of projects that integrate housing with
commercial uses and other compatible uses. [2000 GP Objective CD-
9B]
CD-9.3 Encourage mixed-use development along the east side of Newport Boulevard
between Mesa Drive and Walnut Street. Establish incentives for the development
of projects in planned development zones that integrate housing with retail and
office uses. [2000 GP Policy CD-9B.1]
CD-9.4 Encourage the development of mixed-use urban villages along specified areas of
West 17th Street, West 19th Street, and Superior Avenue that integrates
residential with office, retail, business services, personal services, public spaces
and uses, and other community amenities in a single building (vertical mixed-use
development) or in proximity on the same site (horizontal mixed-use
development). [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-9.5 Promote new types of urban housing that could be target-marketed to people
seeking alternative housing choices in proximity to a major commercial area.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-9.6 Support efforts to mix compatible uses and activities. Encourage the siting of
community-oriented services, businesses, and amenities in and near mixed-use
neighborhoods, including schools, libraries, open space, and parks. [2000 GP
Policy CD-9B.2]
Goal CD-10:
Industrial and Business Parks
Promote quality design approaches for the redevelopment of existing industrial buildings, encourage the
design to incorporate or provide flexibility for the needs of emerging types of industrial uses, and strive
to match design with overall character of nodes, corridors, or districts if applicable. [2000 GP Goal CD-
10 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective CD-10A: Require that industrial and business park projects meet high-quality
design standards. [2000 GP Policy CD-10A]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 51
CD-10.1 Require that industrial projects be designed to convey visual interest and a
positive image. Architectural qualities and design elements encouraged for
industrial uses are:
• Building modulation indentations and architectural details
• Building entry accentuation
• Screening of equipment and storage areas
• Landscaping to soften building exteriors and to serve as a buffer between
uses [2000 GP Policy CD-10A.1]
CD-10.2 Encourage that the design of industrial buildings considers the visual and
physical relationship to adjacent uses. An industrial structure which dominates its
surrounding environment by its relative size shall generally be discouraged.
[2000 GP Policy CD-10A.2]
CD-10.3 Encourage adaptive reuse of existing industrial structures which results in
rehabilitated buildings with distinctive and attractive architecture. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CD-10.4 Promote the use of materials and colors that produce diversity and visual interest
in industrial buildings. The use of various siding materials (i.e., masonry,
concrete texturing, cement, or plaster) can produce effects of texture and relief
that provide architectural interest. [2000 GP Policy CD-10A.3]
CD-10.5 Require that landscaping be used to define areas such as entrances to industrial
buildings and parking lots; define the edges of developments; provide transition
between neighboring properties; and provide screening for outdoor storage,
loading, and equipment areas. Landscaping should be in scale with adjacent
buildings and be of an appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended
purpose. [2000 GP Policy CD-10A.4]
CD-10.6 Require that the design of lighting fixtures and their structural support be of a
scale and architectural design compatible with on-site industrial buildings. Large
areas should be illuminated to minimize the visual impact and amount of spillover
light onto surrounding projects. [2000 GP Policy CD-10A.5]
Objective CD-10B: Ensure that the development of industrial projects are positive additions
to the City’s community setting and do not result in adverse impacts with
adjacent uses. [2000 GP Objective CD-10B]
CD-10.7 Require industrial projects to incorporate landscape setbacks, screening walls,
and/or other elements that mitigate negative impacts with adjacent uses. [2000
GP Policy CD-10B.1]
CD-10.8 Protect transitional areas between industrial and other uses. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
CD-10.9 Storage yards, parking areas, and service areas should be screened from public
view. [2000 GP Policy CD-10B.2]
Goal CD-11:
Attractive Signs that Reflect Costa Mesa
Ensure that signs contribute positively to Costa Mesa’s image and overall economic development.
[2000 GP Goal CD-13]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 52
Objective CD-11A: Facilitate the installation of signs that contribute to a positive image of
the public realm. [2000 GP Objective CD-13]
CD-11.1 Encourage homeowners' associations and neighborhoods to maintain housing
tract entrance signs in an attractive condition, and encourage the placement of
such signs at the entrance of major developments which do not have such
identification. [2000 GP Policy CD-13.1]
CD-11.2 Encourage the use of common design elements in signs for commercial and
industrial centers through the development of planned sign programs to improve
center identity by publicizing the benefits of such programs to developers and
local business operators. [2000 GP Policy CD-13.2]
CD-11.3 Encourage citywide sign design guidelines that promote creativity and flexibility
while upholding design quality. Design guidelines could include the design and
placement of business signs, public street graphics, street signs, locational and
directional signs, traffic signs, etc. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
CD-11.4 Introduce distinctive entry signage within the Costa Mesa Streetscape and
Median Development Guidelines which effectively announces arrival to unique
districts and neighborhoods. [2000 GP Policy CD-13.3 – Modified for 2015-2035
GP]
CD-11.5 Develop and design signage that helps with way-finding throughout the City so
visitors and residents can easily access destination locations and identify
landmarks. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Goal CD-12:
Public Safety through Design
Use design approaches to enhance public safety. [2000 GP Goal CD-14 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective CD-12A: Incorporate public safety considerations into community design. [2000
GP Objective CD-14]
CD-12.1 Decrease the opportunity for criminal activity by addressing high-risk
circumstances (e.g., dark alleys, enclosed stairwells, and dark entrances).
Involve the Police and Fire Departments in reviewing and making design
recommendations during the project review process. [2000 GP Policy CD-14.1]
CD-12.2 Continue to implement and refine development standards and/or guidelines
based on Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) for new
development and redevelopment with emphasis on site and building design to
minimize vulnerability to criminal activity. [2000 GP Policy CD-14.2]
CD-12.3 Continue to provide CPTED training to City staff and local planning and design
professionals to optimize public safety through community design. [2000 GP
Policy CD-14.3]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 53
Open Space and Recreation Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address open space and recreation are as follows:
Goal OSR-1:
Balanced and Accessible System of Parks and Open Spaces
Provide a high-quality environment through the development of recreation resources and preservation
of open space that meets community needs in Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Goal OSR-1]
Objective OSR-1A: Maintain and preserve existing parks, and strive to provide additional
parks, public spaces, and recreation facilities that meet the community’s
evolving needs. [2000 GP Objective OSR-1A]
Adequate Neighborhood and Community Park Recreational Facilities
OSR-1.1: Maintain a system of Neighborhood and Community Parks that provide a variety
of active and passive recreational opportunities throughout the City. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.2: Provide parks and recreation facilities appropriate for the individual
neighborhoods in which they are located and reflective of the needs and interests
of the population they serve. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Acquisition of New Parkland
OSR-1.3: Pursue the acquisition and development of pocket and neighborhood parks
within park-deficient areas, as identified in Figure OSR-3: Planning Areas and
Underserved Park Areas. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.3 – Modified for 2105-2035
GP]
OSR-1.4: Prioritize the acquisition of land for parks in underserved neighborhoods. [2000
GP Policy OSR-1A.14 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.5: Maximize public space by requiring plazas and public gathering spaces in private
developments that can serve multiple uses, including recreation and social
needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.6: Provide maximum visibility and accessibility for future public parks by locating
facilities in close proximity to public streets. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.2]
OSR-1.7: Adjust and update development fee programs to accumulate funds for the
acquisition and improvement of parks and recreation facilities commensurate
with identified need and population growth. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Balance of Passive and Active Recreation
OSR-1.8: Require that parks and recreation facilities reflect new trends and population
changes, and are developed with facilities appropriate to all ages, including
athletic fields, active play areas, passive open space, tot lots, and picnic areas.
[2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.15]
OSR-1.9: Conduct a sports facility study to review current outdoor facility locations and
resources and a demographic study for future facility requirements as they relate
to planned growth within the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.10: Pursue additional community garden lots and spaces to meet demand and need
by the community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 54
Park Maintenance and Retrofit
OSR-1.11: Perform regular maintenance of facilities to ensure proper working order of all
recreation facilities and equipment. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.12: Retrofit parks and recreation facilities to provide disability access as required by
law. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.13: Design and reform parks to reflect the latest recreational features that respond to
demographic changes and community needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.14: Consult with law enforcement agencies, surrounding cities, community policing
groups, and OC Parks to create a safe and healthy environment at Talbert
Regional Park, Fairview Park, and along the Santa Ana River. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
Long-Term Planning of Institutional Uses
OSR-1.15: Continue to pursue opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities
owned by private organizations such as private schools, faith-based groups,
service clubs, and hospitals. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.10]
OSR-1.16: Continue to coordinate with the Newport-Mesa Unified School District to
supplement City park facilities through joint-use agreements. [2000 GP Policy
OSR-1A.10]
OSR-1.17: Consult with Orange County Fairgrounds in implementing OC Fair & Event
Center Master Plan. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Level of Service and Access
OSR-1.18: Provide a minimum of 4.26 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. [2000 GP
Policy OSR-1A.1]
OSR-1.19: Update the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan every 10 years, as
feasible. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.15]
OSR-1.20: Enhance pedestrian, bicycle, and transit linkages to meet the needs of residents
and to provide better access to parks, recreation, and public spaces. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-1.21: Provide opportunities for public access to all open space areas, except where
sensitive resources may be threatened or damaged, public health and safety
may be compromised, or access would interfere with the managed production of
resources. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GOAL OSR-2:
Community Services Programs Meeting Community Needs
Enhancing the community through the delivery of innovative recreational programs, quality parks and
facilities and services that promote social, physical, and emotional well-being. High-quality community
services programs demonstrate the City’s commitment to providing opportunities for recreational,
physical, and educational activities for residents of all ages. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective OSR-2A: Provide activities, classes, and a variety of programs to meet the year-
round recreational needs of all residents: children, adult, seniors, and
persons with special needs. [New Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 55
High-quality Community Services
OSR-2.1: Provide high-quality community services programs that are flexible and
responsive to the community’s changing needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.2: Plan and conduct citywide special events that bring residents together to create
an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.3: Continue to consult with nonprofit sports organizations and recreational groups to
support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and
supplement those offered by the City. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.4: Update existing facilities for senior citizens, youth, adults, and overall community
use. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Community Services to Support Community Needs
OSR-2.5: Monitor and research the ever-changing community services needs of the
community, and develop action plans to address those needs through
partnerships with service agencies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.6: Continue to provide rental opportunities at community facilities and parks for
residents, nonprofit groups, and businesses to meet their recreational and
professional needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.7: Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform residents of all
available community services programs, and obtain input from the community
regarding program and service needs. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.8: Encourage resident input and utilize demographic data, partnerships, volunteers,
and existing resources to identify the needs of community. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
OSR-2.9: Identify innovative funding and development opportunities to support and sustain
a responsive community services network. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.10: Continue and expand the development of community partnerships to offer both
standard and innovative services to meet residents’ needs. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
OSR-2.11: Develop and implement community services programs and activities that meet
the needs of specialized populations through the development of community
partnerships. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-2.12: Provide support for volunteer groups that conduct special activities open to the
entire community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GOAL OSR-3:
Conserved Open Space
Costa Mesa is committed to open space conservation to ensure that the network of parklands, trails,
hillsides, and undeveloped natural areas remain viable for supporting biological communities and
providing sanctuary for future generations. This commitment includes expanding public access to open
space, where appropriate, and acquiring additional lands where feasible. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective OSR-3A: Preserve the City’s open space lands and provide additional community
and neighborhood parkland in underserved areas. [New Objective for
2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 56
Open Space Preservation and Stewardship
OSR-3.1: Preserve open space areas along The Santa Ana River, large open space parks,
and along the mesa formations to protect natural habitat and to maintain the
integrity of the natural environment. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-3.2: Encourage the preservation of coastal views from City and County parkland and
public streets within Costa Mesa. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.13]
OSR-3.3: Identify current open space areas for protection, management, and potential
enhancement to maintain and, if possible, increase its value as wildlife habitat.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Management and Maintenance of Open Space
OSR-3.4: Encourage the long-term maintenance and management of open space lands
through open space easements, development rights transfers or acquisition,
zoning regulations, and other incentives. [2000 GP Policy OSR-1A.6]
OSR-3.5: Encourage the greening and beautifying of the Santa Ana River. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-3.6: Encourage opportunities for recreation, history, education, interpretive materials,
and art associated with the Santa Ana River open spaces. [New Policy for 2015-
2035 GP]
OSR-3.7: Promote water quality strategies to improve water quality along the Santa Ana
River. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Coordination and Organization Development
OSR-3.8: Consult with State and regional agencies and the California Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC), regarding open space planning efforts. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-3.9: Consult with the Orange Coast River Park, Inc. and surrounding cities and other
government agencies in maintaining and rehabilitating open space lands along
the Santa Ana River. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-3.10: Consult with OC Parks over the enhancements and management of Talbert
Regional Park without adversely impacting surrounding residential
neighborhoods. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
GOAL OSR-4:
Extensive Arts and Culture Programs and Services
Provide comprehensive and multifaceted arts and culture programs and services that provide education
and entertainment to the community and a broader audience. [New Goal for 2015-2035 GP]
Objective OSR-4A: Support performing and visual arts programs, facilities, and activities
that stimulate the minds and intellectual thinking of community members
to increase awareness of the City’s motto, “The City of the Arts.” [New
Objective for 2015-2035 GP]
Cultural Arts Venues
OSR-4.1: Continue to support the mission of the Segerstrom Center for the Arts and
associate venues and facilities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.2: Support the development and operations of an arts museum at the Segerstrom
Center for the Arts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 57
OSR-4.3: Encourage additional indoor and outdoor facility spaces citywide to display public
art and host arts and culture special events. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Leader in the Arts
OSR-4.4: Expand the City's role as a supporter of the arts. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.5: Encourage financial support of the arts by supporting non-profit groups and
foundations. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.6: Consider preparation of an arts and culture master plan for the City. [New Policy
for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.7: Consult with local agencies and surrounding cities to address the creation and
implementation of arts-friendly policies. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.8: Enhance Costa Mesa’s position as a leader in the arts in Southern California and
its recognition nationally as a city devoted to arts institutions of superior quality.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.9: Engage community members in arts activities, and utilize the arts to provide
educational and cultural awareness opportunities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.10: Continue the City’s commitment to its arts in cooperation with the private sector.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.11: Provide opportunities for local artists to create and display their work. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Arts Programs and Events
OSR-4.12: Support arts activities, programs, events, and facilities for patrons to enjoy and
share experiences, and that enhance the City’s economic vitality. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.13: Designate Community Services Department staff with the responsibility for
expanding and implementing activities related to recreational arts programming.
[New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.14: Pursue cooperative educational cultural programs enlisting the aid of public and
private institutions. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Arts in Public Places and in Private Development
OSR-4.15: Continue to review adopting an Arts in Public Places Program. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.16: Pursue the placement of public art in prominent locations, particularly along
major travel corridors to enliven and beautify the public realm. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
OSR-4.17: Develop incentives or programs that encourage art in new developments. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 58
Historical and Cultural Resources Element
The goals, objectives, and policies that address historical and cultural resources are as follows:
Goal HCR-1:
Historical, Archeological, and Paleontological Resource Preservation
The City of Costa Mesa supports focused efforts to provide residents with a sense of community and
history through the protection and preservation of historical and cultural resources. [2000 GP Goal
HCR-1]
Objective HCR-1A: Encourage preservation and protection of the City’s archaeological,
paleontological, and historical resources. [2000 GP Objective HCR-1A]
Preserving Historical Resources
HCR-1.1: Encourage protection and enhancement of the diverse range of historical sites
and resources in the City for the benefit of current and future residents and
visitors. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
HCR-1.2: Encourage the preservation of significant historical resources (as identified in
Table HCR-1) by developing and implementing incentives such as building and
planning application permit fee waivers, Mills Act contracts, grants and loans,
and implementing other incentives identified in the Historical Preservation
Ordinance. [2000 GP Policy HCR-1A.4]
HCR-1.3: Promote context-sensitive design that respects and celebrates the history and
historical character of sites and resources while meeting contemporary needs of
the community. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
HCR-1.4: Require, as part of the environmental review procedure, an evaluation of the
significance of paleontological, archaeological, and historical resources, and the
impact of proposed development on those resources. [2000 GP Policy HCR-
1A.1]
HCR-1.5: Continue to identify local landmarks with markers and way-finding signage.
Include informational signage about local history, utilizing maps to highlight
locations of other historical resources at popular historical sites. [New Policy for
2015-2035 GP]
HCR-1.6: Encourage development of an interpretive center for paleontological,
archaeological, and historical resources at Fairview Park. The center may
contain resources found in the park area as well as resources found throughout
the City. [2000 GP Policy HCR-1A.6]
Preserving Archaeological Resources
HCR-1.7: Require cultural resources studies (i.e, archaeological and historical
investigations) for all applicable discretionary projects, in accordance with CEQA
regulations. The studies should identify cultural resources (i.e., prehistorical sites,
historical sites, and isolated artifacts and features) in the project area, determine
their eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources, and
provide mitigation measures for any resources in the project area that cannot be
avoided. Cultural resources studies shall be completed by a professional
archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications Standards in prehistorical or historical archaeology. [2000 GP
Policy HCR-1A.2 and HCR-1A.3 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
2015-2035 GENERAL PLAN
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PAGE 59
HCR-1.8: Comply with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act regarding
protection and recovery of archaeological resources discovered during
development activities. [New Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Preserving Paleontological Resources
HCR-1.9: Require paleontological studies for all applicable discretionary projects. The
studies should identify paleontological resources in the project area, and provide
mitigation measures for any resources in the project area that cannot be avoided.
[2000 GP Policy HCR-1A.2 and HCR-1A.3 – Modified for 2015-2035 GP]
HCR-1.10: Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act regarding the protection
and recovery of paleontological resources during development activities. [New
Policy for 2015-2035 GP]
Annual Review of Costa Mesa General Plan (5th Edition)
Appendix B
Housing Successor Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2019-2020
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 1
COSTA MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT
AS HOUSING AUTHORITY AND AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 UNDER CALIFORNIA
HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 34176.1 AND 34328
This annual report (Report) of the Costa Mesa Housing Authority (Housing Authority) is
prepared under the California Health and Safety Code (HSC), Division 24, Parts 1.8 and
1.85 (Dissolution Law), in particular Section 34176.1 as the housing successor, and under
the California Housing Authorities Law, HSC Section 34200, et seq. (HAL), in particular
Section 34328 as a housing authority. The Dissolution Law and HAL respectively require
preparation of an annual report on the housing successor and the housing authority’s
activities for the prior fiscal year. This Report details the Housing Authority’s activities
during Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20 and is intended to satisfy the requirements under both
HSC Sections 34176.1 and 34328. More specifically, this Report includes information
required about the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF) and other
information under Section 34176.1(f).
This Report is based on information prepared by City staff on behalf of the Housing
Authority and data contained within the independent financial audit of the LMIHAF (Audit),
which is prepared by Davis Farr LLP and accompanies this Report. The Audit is
incorporated in the City of Costa Mesa’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
for FY 2019-20. A copy of the Report in this draft form, has been provided to the City
Council, as governing body, and to the Housing Authority by December 31, 2020 under
34176.1(f). Upon their joint review and action to file the Report in an open meeting in
January 2021, this Report will be posted on the City’s website www.costamesaca.gov and
thereafter appended to the City’s annual update report prepared under Section 65400 of
the Government Code.
This Report conforms with and is organized into sections I through XIV, inclusive, under
HSC Section 34176.1(f) of the Dissolution Law and Section 34328 of the HAL:
I. Amounts Received and Deposited Under 34191.4(b)(3)(A). This section
provides the total amount of funds paid to the City and the amount deposited into
the LMIHAF representing 20% of repayments on the reinstated City/Agency loan
per Section 34191.4.
The Department of Finance (DOF) approved a total of $1,291,045 attributable to
the reinstated City/Agency loan under Section 34191.4. The Successor Agency
received $1,270,134 in FY 2019-20, after factoring in excess cash on hand of
$20,911 from previously approved obligations. Of the $1,291,045, $1,032,836
(representing 80% of $1,291,045) was due to the City. The remaining balance was
deposited into the LMIHAF upon receipt in May 2020, totaling $258,209
(representing 20% of $1,291,045).
II. Amount Deposited into LMIHAF . This section provides the total amount of funds
deposited into the LMIHAF in FY 2019-20 and itemized by amounts listed on
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS), amounts representing Section
34191.4 deposits, and other amounts deposited into the LMIHAF.
• In FY 2019-20, the amount of $258,209 (representing 20% of $1,291,045)
was deposited into the LMIHAF;
• $0 was held for items listed on the ROPS; and
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 2
• other deposits into the LMIHAF in FY 2019-20 were: (1) $405,379 rental
income, (2) $5,111 loan repayments, and (3) $102,263 investment income.
The cumulative total of all deposits into the LMIHAF was $770,962 during FY 2019-
20.
III. Ending Balance of LMIHAF. This section provides a statement of the balance in
the LMIHAF as of the close of FY 2019-20. Any amounts deposited for items listed
on the ROPS and amounts representing Section 34191.4 deposits, must be
distinguished from the other amounts deposited.
At the close of FY 2019-20 on June 30, 2020, the ending balance in the LMIHAF
was $3,640,616, of which $0 was held for items listed on the ROPS.
IV. Description of Expenditures from LMIHAF. This section provides a description
of expenditures made from the LMIHAF during FY 2019-20. The expenditures are
to be categorized among (A) administration for monitoring, preserving covenanted
housing units; (B) homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services; and
(C) development of housing.
The table below lists and describes FY 2019-20 LMIHAF expenditures by
category:
Monitoring
and
Administration
Expenditures
Costs for monitoring, enforcement, and preserving
long-term affordable housing covenants imposed by
the former Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency
(Former Agency) or the Housing Authority, as
housing successor.
The maximum expenditure for this category in FY
2019-20 is the greater of (a) 5% of the statutory value
of (i) real property owned by the housing successor
and (ii) loans and grants receivable, or (b) $200,000
(plus allowed CPI adjustments).
Based on the valuation listed in Section V,
[lines 5+6 in that table=$5,563,039] for FY 2019-20,
the Housing Authority as housing successor was
authorized to spend up to $278,152 (i.e., 5% of
$5,563,039), but expended only $96,911.
$96,911
Homeless
Prevention
and Rapid
Rehousing
Services
Expenditures
Costs for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing
supportive services for individuals and families who
are homeless or would be homeless without this
assistance.
The housing successor was authorized to spend up
to $250,000 for this category in FY 2019-20 and had
spent $250,000.
250,000
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 3
Housing
Development
Expenditures
Costs for housing “development”, which term is
defined to include: (a) new construction, (b)
acquisition and rehabilitation, (c) substantial
rehabilitation, (d) long-term affordability covenants
on multifamily units, and (e) preservation of assisted
affordable housing that is eligible for (i) prepayment,
(ii) termination, or (iii) for which the expiration of
rental restrictions is scheduled to occur within five
years.
The costs in this category represent the operating
costs for a 30-apartment low and very low income
housing property
The 30 apartments within eight properties commonly
referred to as James/W. 18th Properties, were
acquired by the City and Housing Authority through
non-judicial foreclosure proceedings in FY 2015-
2016. This acquisition was made in order to
preserve the long-term affordable housing
covenants which were at risk of termination and
potential conversion to market housing. The intent at
that time was to transfer this property to an
experienced affordable housing developer for
development of continued affordable housing at
these properties, such as disposition or ground
lease for substantial rehabilitation or new
construction and covenanted housing for extremely
low, very low, and low-income persons and
households.
The eight properties are still owned by the Housing
Authority and continue to be operated as affordable
housing units for low and very low income
households/tenants by a professional property
management company. The operating costs for the
property include staff salaries and benefits, utilities,
supplies, repairs and maintenance, taxes, property
management fees, legal and consulting costs. The
total amount spent in FY 2019-20 was $177,469.
177,469
Total FY 2019-20 LMIHAF Expenditures $524,380
V. Statutory Value of Assets Owned by Housing Successor. This section provides
the statutory value of real property owned by the Housing Authority, as housing
successor, the value of loans and grants receivables, and the sum of these two
amounts.
Under Dissolution Law and for purposes of this Report, the “statutory value of real
property” means the value of properties formerly held by the Former Agency as
listed on the housing asset transfer schedule approved by the DOF under Section
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 4
34176(a)(2), the value of the properties transferred to the housing successor under
Section 34181(f), and the purchase price of properties purchased by the Housing
Authority. Further, the value of loans and grants receivable is included in these
reported assets held in the LMIHAF.
The following table provides the statutory value of assets owned by the Housing
Authority as of the end of FY 2019-20:
VI. Description of Transfers. This section describes transfers, if any, to another
housing successor made in previous fiscal year(s), including whether the funds are
unencumbered and the status of projects, if any, for which the transferred LMIHAF
will be used. The sole purpose of the transfers must be for development of transit
priority projects, permanent supportive housing, regional homeless shelters,
housing for agricultural employees, or special needs housing.
The Housing Authority, as housing successor, did not make any LMIHAF transfers
to other housing successor(s) under Section 34176.1(c)(2) during FY 2019-20.
VII. Project Descriptions. This section describes any project for which the Housing
Authority, as housing successor, receives or holds property tax revenue under the
ROPS and the status of that project.
The Housing Authority, as housing successor, does not receive or hold property tax
revenue under a ROPS.
VIII. Status of Compliance with Section 33334.16. As and if applicable, this section
provides a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16 for interests in real
property acquired by the former redevelopment agency prior to February 1, 2012.
For interests in real property, if any, acquired on or after February 1, 2012, provide
a status update on the project.
Section 34176.1 provides that Section 33334.16 does not apply to interests in real
property acquired by the Housing Authority, as housing successor, on or after
February 1, 2012.
With respect to interests in real property acquired by the Former Agency prior to
February 1, 2012, the time periods described in Section 33334.16 shall be deemed
1.Cash and Investments $3,646,271
2.Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agent 24,615
3.Interest Receivable 11,879
4.Rent Receivable 17,576
5.
6.Value of Loans and Grants Receivable 862,534
Total Statutory Asset Value $9,263,380
Statutory Value of Real Property Owned by
the Housing Authority
As of June 30, 2020
End of FY 2019-20
4,700,505
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 5
to have commenced on the date that the DOF approved the property as a housing
asset in the LMIHAF; thus, as to real property acquired by the Former Agency, now
held by the Housing Authority as housing successor, in the LMIHAF, the Housing
Authority as housing successor, must initiate activities consistent with development
(as the term is explained in Section IV and Section 34176.1(a)(3)(D)) of the real
property for the purpose for which it was acquired within five years of the date the
DOF approved such property as a housing asset.
In this regard, the Housing Authority as housing successor, did not own any real
property acquired for development (to be developed) as of dissolution on February
1, 2012 subject to this limitation so the five-year limitation of Section 33334.16 does
not apply.
It is noted that the Former Agency held at dissolution, now the Housing Authority
holds as landlord/ground lessor, the underlying fee interests in three Ground
Leases with Costa Mesa Family Village, a California limited partnership, as
tenant/ground lessee (affiliate of Shapell Properties) relating to the existing 72-unit
multifamily affordable housing apartment development called Costa Mesa Family
Village, located at 1924 and 1981 Wallace Avenue and 2015 Pomona Avenue. The
three ground leases end/expire in 2039. Section 33334.16 does not apply to such
ground leases and this existing affordable housing development as the subject
property was not held for development; it is developed property.
IX. Description of Outstanding Obligations under Section 33413. This section
describes outstanding inclusionary and replacement housing obligations, if any,
under Section 33413 that remained outstanding prior to dissolution of the former
redevelopment agency as of February 1, 2012, along with the Housing Authority’s
progress, as housing successor, in meeting those prior obligations, if any, of the
former redevelopment agency and how the Housing Authority, as housing
successor, plans to meet unmet obligations, if any.
Replacement Housing: Under the Former Agency’s last Implementation Plan in
effect prior to dissolution (the 2010-2014 plan), the Former Agency’s replacement
housing obligations, if any, under Section 33413(a) were transferred to the
Housing Authority as housing successor; however, the Former Agency had no
outstanding replacement housing obligations as of dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Inclusionary/Production Housing. Under the Former Agency’s last
Implementation Plan in effect prior to dissolution (the 2010-2014 plan), its
inclusionary/production housing obligations, if any, under Section 33413(b) were
transferred to the Housing Authority as housing successor; however, the Former
Agency had no outstanding inclusionary/production housing obligations as of
dissolution on February 1, 2012.
Therefore, the Housing Authority, as housing successor, has no outstanding
replacement or inclusionary/production housing obligations and thus no
implementation obligation under Section 33413.
For information, the Former Agency’s Implementation Plan is posted on the City’s
website at www.costamesaca.gov.
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 6
X. Income Test. This section provides information required by Section
34176.1(a)(3)(B), or a description of expenditures by income category and
restriction for the applicable five-year period, with the time period beginning
January 1, 2014 and whether the statutory thresholds have been met. However,
the income test is not required until year 2019.
The applicable provisions of Sections 34176.1(a)(3)(A)(B)(C) require that the
Housing Authority, as housing successor, must require at least 30% of the LMIHAF
to be expended for development of rental housing affordable to and occupied by
households earning 30% or less of the Area Median Income (AMI). If the Housing
Authority as housing successor, fails to comply with the extremely-low income
requirement in a five-year reporting period, then the provisions of Section
34176.1(B) will apply in each fiscal year following the latest fiscal year following the
Report are expended for the development of housing occupied by extremely low
income households until the housing successor demonstrates compliance with such
requirement in a subsequent annual report.
FY 2018-19 was the end of the initial five-year period under Section
34176.1(a)(3)(B). The Housing Authority initiated and in the midst of an RFP
process for which development proposals have been submitted, proposing
developers have been interviewed by a panel of staff, housing/economic
consultants and legal counsel, with the next step to present the RFP process and
supporting information to the City Council and Housing Authority during FY 2020-
21 so the governing bodies may consider and exercise their discretion regarding
development of the James/W.18th Properties as defined by Section
34176.1(a)(3)(D). For any selected developer and proposed project, the Housing
Authority will require compliance with the applicable income and funding provisions
of Section 34176.1(a)(3)(A)(B)(C); in any event, not less than three units of the 30
units among the eight James/W.18th Properties will be covenanted for occupancy
by extremely low income tenants/households. It is noted the City is party to a
contract that affects, in part, the James/W.18th Properties under which the City
agreed to issue the RFP described in this Section X, which RFP process has been
undertaken timely pursuant to that agreement. When the City Council and Housing
Authority select a developer and project, in all instances not less than three
extremely low income units will be included and covenanted in the project, and as
applicable additional units if required to comply with the applicable income and
funding provisions of Section 34176.1(a)(3)(A)(B)(C).
XI. Senior Housing Test. This section provides the percentage of deed-restricted
rental housing units restricted to seniors and assisted individually or jointly by the
housing successor, its former redevelopment agency, and its host jurisdiction
within the previous 10 years in relation to the aggregate number of units of deed-
restricted rental housing assisted individually or jointly by the housing successor,
its former redevelopment agency and its host jurisdiction within the same 10-year
time period.
The housing successor is to calculate the percentage of units of deed-restricted
rental housing restricted to seniors and assisted by the housing successor, the
Former Agency and/or the City within the previous 10 years in relation to the
aggregate number of units of deed-restricted rental housing assisted by the
housing successor, the Former Agency, and/or City within the same time period. If
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 7
this percentage exceeds 50%, then the housing successor cannot expend future
LMIHAF funds to assist additional senior housing units until the Housing Authority
as housing successor, or City assists and construction has commenced on a
number of restricted rental units that is equal to 50% of the total amount of deed-
restricted rental units.
As reported in the prior FY 2018-19 annual report, for the 10-year period of January
1, 2004 to January 1, 2014, 9.8% of the funds were expended on assistance to
provide senior affordable housing units and 90.2% of the funds were expended on
assistance to provide non-senior/family affordable housing units. In particular, 36
senior units with long-term 55-year affordability covenants were established during
the previous 10-year period (specifically, the St. John’s Manor Project in 2006).
For the current 10-year period of January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2024 that includes
the subject FY 2019-20, the Housing Authority expended no funds ($0) for senior
housing thus far; therefore 0% of funds were expended on development or
assistance to develop senior housing units.
XII. Excess Surplus Test. This section provides the amount of excess surplus in the
LMIHAF, if any, and the length of time that the housing successor has had excess
surplus, and the housing successor’s plan for eliminating the excess surplus.
The term excess surplus is defined in Section 34176.1(d) as: “an unencumbered
amount in the LMIHAF account that exceeds the greater of one million dollars
($1,000,000) or the aggregate amount deposited into the account during the
housing successor’s preceding four fiscal years, whichever is greater.” The table
below provides the Excess Surplus test for the preceding four years. The LMIHAF
does not have an excess surplus.
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 8
XIII. Inventory of Homeownership Units. This section provides a summary of
covenanted homeownership units assisted by the former redevelopment agency
or the housing successor that include equity sharing and repayment provisions,
including: (A) number of units; (B) number of units lost to the portfolio in the last
fiscal year and the reason for those losses; and (C) any funds returned to the
housing successor due to losses or repayments.
This section provides an inventory of homeownership units assisted by the Former
Agency and assumed by the Housing Authority as housing successor, that are
subject to covenants or restrictions or to an adopted program that protects the
Former Agency’s investment of moneys from the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund per Section 33334.3(f).
Total homeownership inventory as of dissolution on February 1, 2012
(subparagraph (A) below) and inventory, losses, and repayments for the period
from February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2019(subparagraph (B) below) include:
(A) As of dissolution on February 1, 2012, the total number of homeownership units
assisted by the Former Agency and had covenants and restrictions of record
was 41 units, which included loans and restricted single-family homes assisted
by the Former Agency through its (1) First Time Homebuyer (FTHB) Program,
(2) Single-Family Rehabilitation (SF Rehab) Program, (3) affordable housing
projects with Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, and (4) Neighborhood
LMIHAF LMIHAF
July 1, 2019 July 1, 2020
Opening Fund Balance $ 3,394,034 $ 3,640,616
Less Unavailable Amounts:
Loans Receivable Net (862,533) (862,534)
Encumbrances - -
Available Housing Successor
Funds (A) 2,531,501 2,778,082
Limitation (Greater of $1,000,000 or four years deposits):
Aggregate Amount Deposited for last four years:
2019-20 N/A $ 770,962
2018-19 $ 827,902 827,902
2017-18 687,292 687,292
2016-17 922,994 922,994
2015-16 922,260 N/A
Total $ 3,360,448 $ 3,209,150
Base Limitation $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
Greater Amount (B) $ 3,360,448 $ 3,209,150
Excess/Surplus [(A)-(B)]$0 $0
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 9
Stabilization Program.
(B) The total number of homeownership units lost to the Housing Authority’s
portfolio as housing successor between February 1, 2012 through June 30,
2020, along with the reasons for those losses.
Total losses between February 1, 2012 and June 30, 2020: 27 units
Reasons for the units’ losses from the homeownership portfolio:
Principal Repayments: $717,458
Loan Impairment: $1,095,000
Foreclosure: $436,000
Funds returned to the Housing Authority as housing successor, as part of an
adopted program that protects the Former Agency’s investment of moneys from
the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, including loan principal, interest,
and equity sharing payments between February 1, 2012 and June 30, 2020:
$1,143,825.
(C) The number of homeownership units lost to the Housing Authority’s portfolio as
housing successor in FY 2019-20 and the reason for those losses.
There was no homeownership units lost to the Housing Authority’s portfolio as
housing successor in FY 2019-20.
Two owners made partial payments on homeownership loans. Principal and
interest payments received totaled $5,111 and were deposited into the
LMIHAF.
The funds returned to the Housing Authority as housing successor, as part of
an adopted program that protects the Former Agency’s investment of moneys
from Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, included repayments of SF
Rehab and FTHB program loans. Total principal, interest, and equity sharing
payments during FY 2019-20 was $5,111.
(D) The Housing Authority as housing successor, has existing consulting
agreements with: AmeriNational Community Services, Inc., a Minnesota
Corporation (dba AmeriNat) and Farmers State Bank of Hartland, a Minnesota
corporation. The agreements are related to certain, but not all, aspects of
administration of the Former Agency’s SF Rehab and FTHB programs that
provided second lien mortgages for homeownership units. The consulting
services include assistance with oversight and administration of amortized loan
payments, if any, due; with tracking and calculation of loan balances in the
event of payoff; and, other administrative activities for these outstanding SF
Rehab and FTHB loans.
In addition, the Housing Authority retains the services of Keyser Marston
Associates, a professional housing economic consultant, and the Housing
Authority legal counsels, City Attorney and Authority General Counsel Kimberly
Hall Barlow of Jones & Mayer, and Celeste Brady of Stradling Yocca Carlson
Costa Mesa Housing Authority
Housing Successor Annual Report FY 2019-20 Page | 10
& Rauth (SYCR). Counsels assist staff in reviewing legal issues related to
outstanding SF Rehab and FTHB program loans, such as the refinancing of
first lien mortgages consistent with SF Rehab and FTHB program refinancing
criteria, repayments, impairment analyses, defaults, foreclosures,
bankruptcies, renting out part of the home, short sale requests, and other
issues that arise in the administration of the former Agency’s loan programs for
ownership housing.
XIV. Additional Information: Housing Authority’s Activities for the preceding year (FY
2019-20) under HSC Section 34328.
Without repeating the information presented above in this Report, the Housing
Authority:
(A) continued to monitor and enforce housing assets transferred from the Former
Agency to the Housing Authority as housing successor, as well as other
Housing Authority (non-housing successor) assets;
(B) continued property management and operation of the James/W.18 th
Properties. See Sections IV. And X. above for more detailed discussion about
these properties. The eight properties include:
• 707, 711 W. 18th Street, 8 units in two 4-plexes; 8 Low Income units;
• 734, 740, 744 James Street, 11 units in one 3-plex and two 4-plexes; 9
Low and 2 Very Low Income units;
• 745 W. 18th Street, 3 units in one 3-plex, 3 Very Low Income units; and
• 717, 721 James Street, 8 Very Low Income units.
(C) As housing successor under Section 34176.1(a)(2), the Housing Authority may
expend up to $250,000 per fiscal year “for homeless prevention and rapid
rehousing services for individuals and families who are homeless or would be
homeless but for this assistance, including the provision of short-term or
medium-term rental assistance, housing relocation, and stabilization services
including housing search, mediation, or outreach to property owners, credit
repair, security or utility deposits, utility payments, rental assistance for a final
month at a location, moving cost assistance, and case management, or other
appropriate activities for homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing of
persons who have become homeless.” In this regard in FY 2019-20 and as
detailed in this Report, the Housing Authority’s LMIHAF provided partial funding
for Community Outreach Workers who assertively work toward placing
homeless individuals and families into temporary or permanent housing as it
becomes available. Staff addresses the various needs represented by the local
homeless population on a daily basis. Further, a part-time Management Analyst
maintains the database that Community Outreach Workers and volunteers
from varied community groups utilize to streamline their reporting and
recordkeeping processes relative to placement of homeless individuals and
families into housing.