Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 - CC-7 - Attachment 1 - 7/20/2021ORDINANCE NO. 2021-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA APPROVING REZONE 20-01 TO REZONE A 15.23-ACRE SITE TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL-HIGH DENSITY (PDR-HD) AND ESTABLISH A SITE-SPECIFIC DENSITY OF 80 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND MAXIMUM 1,057 UNITS FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1683 SUNFLOWER AVENUE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, an application was filed by Brent Stoll of Rose Equities, representing the property owners, requesting approval of certain land use entitlements; WHEREAS, duly noticed public hearings were held by the Planning Commission on April 13, and May 11, 2020 with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal; WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 11, 2020, the Planning Commission recommended that City Council approve the project by a 6-1 vote (Commissioner Zich voting No); WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on June 15, 2021 with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal; WHEREAS, on June 15, 2021, the City Council approved the first reading by a 5- 1 vote (Councilmember Harper voting no and Councilmember Harlan recusing); WHEREAS, the City Council took or will take the following actions by separate resolution; 1. CERTIFY the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2019050014) including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Finding of Facts and Statement of Overriding Consideration; 2. APPROVE General Plan Amendment GP-20-01 to change the land use designation of the project site from Industrial Park (IP) to High Density Residential (HDR) with a site-specific density of 80 du/acre and maximum of 1,057 units; Attachment 1 3. APPROVE Master Plan PA-19-19 for a mixed use development with 1,057 residential units, 6,000 square feet of commercial space and 25,000 square feet of office development; 4. APPROVE Tentative Tract Map No. 19105 (T-19-01) for future subdivision of the subject property including establishing the right to a future airspace subdivision for condominium purposes; 5. APPROVE Development Agreement DA-20-02 by adopting a separate ordinance; and, 6. APPROVE Specific Plan SP-20-01 by adopting a separate ordinance; WHEREAS, the proposed general plan amendment would re-designate the land use from Industrial Park to High Density Residential in order to allow residential use with a site- specific density and building height. To ensure consistency between the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map, the property is rezoned from Industrial Park (MP) to Planned Development Residential – High Density (PDR-HD). WHEREAS, PDR-HD districts are intended for multi-family residential developments and complementary non-residential uses within a planned development. As such, the proposed zoning district would allow a mix of residential and non-residential uses. WHEREAS, the project includes a specific plan adopted with a separate ordinance to allow site-specific development standards (density, building setbacks, open space, land use matrix, parking). The Specific Plan would act as the project’s zoning regulations. Future development on-site and off-site improvements would be required to comply with the Specific Plan development standards and design guidelines – thus, the rezone would be consistent with the Zoning Code, General Plan, and Specific Plan. WHEREAS, rezone is a legislative action subject to the discretionary approval of the final decision body, City Council. The One Metro West Specific Plan establishes the development’s land use plan, development standards, regulations, design guidelines, infrastructure systems, and implementation strategies on which subsequent, project-related development activities would be founded. Upon adoption of the Specific Plan, subsequent project-specific architectural plans, detailed site plans, grading and building permits, and any other actions requiring either ministerial or discretionary approvals would be required to demonstrate consistency with the Specific Plan. WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared by the City in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the Draft EIR was made available for a public comment period beginning on February 7, 2020 and ending on March 23, 2020. During the public review period, City facilities that had copies of the EIR for public review were closed as a result of Governor Newsom’s direction regarding COVID-19; as such, the City extended the review period through March 30, 2020. WHEREAS, a list of comments received and response to the comments are included as part of the Final EIR presented to City Council on June 15, 2021. WHEREAS, the Draft EIR analyzed construction of the project to occur in one phase. The revised construction phasing schedule shows construction is planned to occur in three phases. A technical memo was drafted to evaluate the construction phasing change in terms of impacts to air quality, greenhouse gases, noise, and transportation associated with the revised phasing schedule. The proposed change in the phasing resulted in no significant environmental effects not previously considered in the Draft EIR and do not substantially alter the conclusions or findings of the Draft EIR related to the project’s potential environmental effects or proposed mitigation measures. The change in construction phasing does not constitute “significant new information” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5; as a result, a recirculation of the EIR is not required; WHEREAS, the Final EIR was made available to the public 10 days prior to the City Council public hearing date on the City’s website as well as an email notification sent to previous commenters of the Draft EIR; WHEREAS, the Draft EIR found that the following areas are considered significant unavoidable adverse impacts: greenhouse gas emissions during project operation and transportation during project operation. The City prepared a Statement of Overriding Considerations to demonstrate that decision-makers have balanced the benefits of the proposed project against its significant unavoidable impacts and have determined the benefits outweigh the adverse impacts; therefore, the significant unavoidable impacts would be considered acceptable. WHEREAS, the Statement of Overriding Consideration is included as Exhibit C of Resolution No. 2021-XX. BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record, the City Council hereby APPROVES as follows: SECTION 1: REZONE. The City of Costa Mesa Official Zoning Map is hereby amended as follows: 1. The proposed rezone to Planned Development Residential-High Density (PDR- HD) with a site-specific density of 80 dwelling units per acre and maximum 1,057 units consistent with the General Plan as amended by General Plan Amendment 20-02 and adopted by Resolution No. 2021-XX. 2. There is hereby placed and included in the Planned Development Residential- High Density (PDR-HD) zoning district a 15.23-acre parcel, situated in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California. 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 13-22 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, the Official Zoning Map of the City of Costa Mesa is hereby amended by the change of zone described in Subsections Number 1 and Number 2 above. A copy of the Official Zoning Map and Zoning Code is on file in the office of the Planning Division. SECTION 2: SPECIFIC PLAN. The City of Costa Mesa by a separate ordinance adopts Specific Plan 20-01 for the project area that would be applied as the Zoning document for the area. The One Metro West Specific Plan establishes the development’s land use plan, development standards, zoning regulations and permitted uses, design guidelines, infrastructure systems, and implementation strategies on which subsequent, project-related development activities would be founded. SECTION 3: INCONSISTENCIES. Any provision of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and or further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to affect the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 4: SEVERABILITY. If any provision or clause of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or clauses or applications of this ordinance which can be implemented without the invalid provision, clause or application; and to this end, the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective following approval of the Project by the electorate at the regular municipal election or at a special election funded by the applicant. SECTION 6: CERTIFICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of _______________ 2021. __________________________ John Stephens Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa ATTEST: ___________________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________ Kimberly Hall Barlow City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF COSTA MESA ) I, Brenda Green, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. _________ was introduced and considered section by section at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the _____ day of _____________, 2021, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting of said City Council held on the _____ day of ______________, 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this ______ day of _____________, 2021. ___________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk EXHIBIT A REZONE R-20-01 Amendment to the Zoning Map Change the zoning district designation of the 15.23-acre site at 1683 Sunflower Avenue from Industrial Park (MP) to Planned Development Residential - High Density (PDR-HD) EXHIBIT B Amendment to Table 13-58 Update Table 13-58 to note the site-specific density for the One Metro West project (text changes shown in bold font below) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PDR-LD PDR-MD PDR-HD PDR- NCM PDC PDI Maximum Density per section 13-59 MAXIMUM DENSITY CRITERIA. (dwelling units per acre) 8 12 20 Note: See North Costa Mesa Specific Plan for exceptions. Note: The maximum density for 125 East Baker Street is 58 dwelling units per acre (C0-13-02). Note: The maximum density for 2277 Harbor Boulevard is 54 dwelling units per acre (C0-14-02). Note: The maximum density for 1683 Sunflower Avenue is 80 dwelling units per acre (R-20-01) and maximum 1,057 units 35 20 Note: The maximum density for 1901 Newport Boulevard is 40 dwelling units per acre. See North Costa Mesa Specific Plan for exceptions. Note: No residential development is permitted within the 23.4-acre project site generally addressed as 1375 Sunflower Ave. and 3370 Harbor Blvd.