The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About765 NEWTON WAY - Building Permits� �Ii'� OF �USTA ��ESA CALJFORNIA 92626 P.O. BOX 1200 FROM TNE OFFlCE OF THE DIRECTOR OF BUILD1tVG SAFETY November 14, Z977 Ms. Ruth B. Johnson 221 rlata Street e�'awport Beach, California 92660 Dear Ms, Johnson; As you are probably aware, your ptoperty aC 769-773 Nawton Way in Costa �Sesa will have a drainage problem al�en rains start since the constraction on the lot at 750 West 17th Street wi11 block the drainage fr.om your lot to the East. t1e must advise you that tl�e City does not have an oxdinance covering drainage from Private property and .�e cannot prevent construction which may block drainage. N;r. �Ielson, of the Company which is doing the con- struction has indicated that he is wi2ling to cooperate with Carl Stevens, who owns 765 Plewton Tday, and anyone else who has drainage water that requires disposal. I beli.eve Mr. Nelson has seat you a copy of a letter addressed to �ir. Stavens. At any rate, you shni.ild he aware that Lhe raiawater from your property will not now drain away anu you should make some interim arrangement to provide for the di.sposal of thzs water until a permanenC solution is found. A rainstor� at this tine would produce a large pool of water at the rear of your building and may caase some damage. RDH:nh Yours very truly, � � RICHARD D, ]IAI3HART Director oE,B�ilding Safety January 3, 1978 Mrs. Ruth Kebow 221 Nata Ave. Newport Beach, California 92660 Re: Drainage through 750 West 17th Street Costa Hesa, California Dear Mrs. Kebov: After meeting with Mr. Richard Hanhart, Mrs. Carl Stevens and you, at the Buildir.g Department office in Costa Mesa, I feel that our position is pretty clear at this point. We are willing to help� you solve your problem by allowing you access or giving you an easement across the north end of our property to alleviate your drainage problems. I believe that the Building Department made it clear that it is your responsibility to take care qf the work and that there are approximately three alternatives to solve the problems. 1t.�o of them require drainage across our property in some type of fashion, either underground or surface, however, I am going to repeat the co�ent made in a previous letter "once we have paved our parking I.ot in the back you will no longer be able to underground your drainage at the north end of our property" Zf we can be of any further help, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, • NEWPORT-MESA I,*IVES�ORS ��'�'�- `- • '' v w "`-' - Larry E.�Nelson, �eneral Partner LEN/ca � cc: Richard Hanhart, Director of Building Safety m �ITY 0�-` CdSTA 11�E5A CALIFORNIA 92626 P.O. EOX 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF BUILDING SAFETV November 14, 1977 Ms. Ruth B. Johnson 221 Dlata Street N2wport E�a.:h, California 92660 Dear Ms. .Tohnson: As you are probably aware, your property at 769-773 Newton Way in Costa Mesa will have a'drainage problem when rains start since the construction on the lot at 750 West 17th Street will block the drainage from your lot to the East. We must advise you that the City does not have an ordinance covering drainage from private property and we cannot prevent con&truction which may block drainage. Mr. Nelson, of the Company which is doing the con- struction has indicated that he is willing to cooperate with Carl Stevens, who owns 765 Newton Way, and anyone else who has drainage water that requires disposal. I believe Mr. Nelson has sent you a copy of a letter addressed to Mr. Stevens. At any rate; yoii sho�il.d he aware thyt the rainwater PTO� ?Ulli' PTOD22'C}' will not aow drain away and you should make some interim arrangement to provide for the disposal of this water until a permanent solution is found. A rainstorm at this time would produce a large pool of water at the rear of your building and may cause some damage. RDH:nh Yours very truly, � RICHARD D. HANHART Director of Building Safety � hOY B.WOOlSEY JOSEVH.�.NCELO R08ERT L.TMATCMER �tOBERT A. Fp5TER3L WILIIAM G. SULUVAN WOOLSEY, ANGELO & THATCHER LA'rYYERS . 2099 SAN JOAOUIN MILLS ROAD NEWPORT CENTER NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 November 29, 1977 Newport Mesa Investors 2750 So. Harbor Blvd., Suite C Santa Ana, CA 92704 Attention: Mr. Larry E. Nelson Re: Dear Mr. Nelson: Drainage through 750 West 17th Street, Costa Mesa I1REA CODE >i♦ 690-Op00 I represent Ruth B. Kebow who ocans the property at 769-773 Newton Way, Costa Mesa, near your subject property, and I have read your letter of November 10, 1977 to Carl R. Stevens, copy to Ruth B. Johnson, who is now Ruth B. Kebo�a. _� Mrs. Kebocv's property has drained through your prop- erty for many years and, in my opinion, she has an estab- lished property right in the continuance of ihat drainage. Mrs. Kebow is not required to take precautions.with respect to the drainage. In building on your proper.ty, you are not permitted to interfere with the drainage of natural flood waters coming across or originating on her property and draining through your property. You and others interruptinq this drainage will be liable for damages caused by any inter- ruption of this drainage. It is requested that you advise us promptly o£ the plans with respect to this drainage. matter. RBW:EH Please have your attorney call me concerning this cc: City of Director 92626 - Very truly yours, ; ��,. � .,, /�i -«-�� ; Roy B. L9oolsey Costa Mesa - attention of Building Safety, P regarding Permit 44095 TIr. Richard D. Hanhart, O Box 1200, Costa Mesa i Mr. J. E. Riqgins, Riggins Construction, 12791 Newport Blvd., Suite 1, Tustin, CA � Mrs. Ruth B. Kebow �'v` Newport Mesa Investors Mr. Larry E. Nelson & Mr. Richard Ranger 2750 So.Harbor Blvd., Suite C Santa Ana, Ca.#92704 Dear Mr. Neleon and Mr. Ranger: � Carl R. Stevens > 2133 Orange Ave. Costa Mesa, Ca.#92627 PH: (714) 646-2133 —� October 31, 1977 �4��-��2�- By way of introduction, I am Carl R. Stevens, the property owner at 765 Newton Way, Costa Mesa, Ca., one of the parcels behind the property you are presently improving at 750 W, 17th St.,Costa Mesa,Ca, Upon a recent inspection o£ my property, I became aware of a potential problem which could cause substantial damages to surrounding parcels and improvements. It was not imme@iately apparent to me that any provisions had been made to a1Tow the water, which has historically drained across the rear of your pToperty , to continue. Since we aTe now into the rainy season, I would appreciate it if you would please advise me within the next 15 days of the plans you have made to provide for this drainage. The next heavy rain could cause flooding of the surrounding progerties i£ the run-off is not allowed to follow its normal course along the rear of our properties.:;-. ... An additional potential problem could be the creation of a stagnant body of water of.substantial depth as to be an attractive nuisance to the children in the surrounding areas, thus possibly endangering not only progerties, but individuals as we1T. Continued obstruction of the drainage course wi11 require that a determination o£ liability be made by the appropriate officials. It is my concern that all of our properties be protected from future injury, and that we can eliminate these problema before any damages or accidents occur, Very truly yours, �� . - � Carl R. Stevens CC: Jase� Aran Riggins Construction & lygmt.Co. �o QS �� i� — 4r� C�T`� O �' Ct)STA i1�`� �5�1 ', - I�li�� OFFIC�E �JiE�70AA�fDU1i Nover�ber 2 '�p ROB DUG��pI FROM D"ICK HANHr1RT RE: Complaint by Mrs. Carl Stevens regarding drainage betc:een \ewton Way and Ldest 17th Street Ptrs. Stevens' property receives drainage water from �irs. Johnson's nroperty at 769 Newton Way and has, in the past, passed this water along to the property at 750 West 17th Street cahich, ir, turn passed the water alono again toward the east. A proposed ne�o retaining caall will stop caater frovn flo�aing across the property at 750 West 17th Street and the water wil7. find its way out acress �irs. Johnson's property and �Irs. Stevens property to idetaton S2a; . 197i Carl Stevens developed the property at 765 tiewton Way and, in the process, permi.tted water from the Johnson's property to flow across the rear of the Stevens property. This water, in m� opinion appears to belong to rlrs. Stevens and t•;rs. Sohnson and it would seem to be their responsibilit� since, in developed areas, I have heard, caater. is a common enemy and can be fended off by a developer, such as is happening here. S:nce the City has no- drain2ge ordinance and our only develooment policy eow is to require that each developer take care of his own coater, I see this drainsge problem as a private matter betcaeen property own�rs. P.S. The developer at 750 West 17th Street has, in construction operations, dumped a small amount of eartn on Plrs. Stevens oroperty and we taill tell hin he had better remove this, though'. we do not have legal jurisdiction when n�ighSoring property is da�-aaged. P.S.S. An illegal paint spraj booth was also noted at the rear of .•:rs. Stevezs property. This will havz to oe remeved or leg.lized som��ho:a. RH/ajr � ,, , , �s�,Ci � �.�L _ - �a� ��/v , _ _ _ _ - -_ . -_ _ ��a�r��er�w�-�s� J/` f . ____._.. '__.. .._ .,._..-.. .. /.`��- /�/�� . ........ ... .......:.: _. " Y �iT�/M � \ . . • �/ •'� �� . .. . . �1' +F' 771ri! 7T4'�yl �__ . _.. _.- _..._ __. .:_ _.._- -. _:. - _ "�_ • _ ._ _ _ . ..__ _. y //Y/�b''.��]' A4'�/Y �.• PI 1 � II •; � 1�'�_�.�-� I�O � •''. ' .. � � _ .:. . . . _ • ` � • ♦ ' . � \� •�1• •�• M •� � . . .._. . ._.,___� _'. .. .. ..__ •�__. _... .: . � -.- ..... O i�. �� '. � :. 1 Q _ ..- -: . � - -- -.. ' .' .. . - . �i ( !� �(� Qi.�L .�td . __ ��-�� ,�`�'�d�d roidtl� � . _ - _ iiM +��oltd t� �'1�.t � <rr�°%a%� •� n'aN� _ ��s, � �a�r� n+�� • - - ' - = .5?L _. . .. � �a�� n�B.�iw�N :6 °�L - - - � _ - _ ._ _ . j _ ��/�•� �s'P�/��/� , `�1 /" .. � �. - - _ - = _. _:_, _-_ � � ., - . _� November 10, 1977 Mr. Carl R. Stevens 2133 Orange Ave. Costa Mesa, Cal.ifornia 92627 Dear Mr. Stevens: Thank you for your letter of October 31, 1977. We have not taken any precautions regarding the drainage of your property as we were not aware of any cross lot drainage easements or requirements on the north part of our property. We have proceeded to handl.e our drazn- age problems with the City of Costa Mesa by tying into an existing easement at the northeast corner of our property. We had discussed our drainage problems with the City of Costa Mesa and were instructed to wor.k out any storm drain problems with our down stream neighbors as far as draining our property. Since �e do not wish to create an unsurmontable problem for you, we are willing to allow you access and give you reasonable easements �� to drain across the north end of our property provided that you per- form the work. We would only stipulate that this work be completed, whether it is an underground structure or pump station, before we pave the north portion of our property. If you have not taken rare of your drainage problem by that date we will be forced by our con- strixction schedule to pave out that ar.ea (which will occur in approximately 30 days)that is designated as a parking lot, and you will then have to seek other alternatives to take care of your drainage. We look forward.to'assisting you in whatever way we can. Sincerely yours, NEWPORT MESA INV�STORS �� ' � Larry F,. elson Partner cc: �City of. Costa Mesa, Building Department Ruth B. Johnson R. J. Ranger J. E. Riggins C�TX �F C�S�A t��A CALIFORNIA 92626 P.O. BOX 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF BUILDING SAFETV November 14, Z977 ,Ls, Ruth B. Johnsoa 221 .iata Street Nawport Beach, Caliiornia 92660 Dear Ms. Johnson: As you are probably_aware, your property at 769-773 Newton Way in Costa �fesa will have a drainage problem when rains start since Che construction on the Zot at 750 West 17th Street will b2ock the drainage from your lot to the East. Ide must ad*�ise yov that the City does not have aa ordinance covering drainage from private property and we cannot prevent construction which may block dzainage. rfr. Velson, of the Company which is doing the con- struetion has indicated that he is willing to cooperate with Carl Stevens, who owns 765 Plewton '.�'ay, and anyone else who nas d�ainage water that requires disposal, I believe Mr. \elson has sent you a copy of a letter addressed to PSr. Stavens. At am� rate, you shonld he aware th<t the tainwater froa your property c:ill not now drain away and you should nake some interim arrangement to provide for the disposal of this water until a petmanent solution is found. A rainstor� at this titae would pzoduce a large pool of water at the rear of your building and may cause some damage. Yours very truly, � RICHARD D. I3AN'H�1RT birector of,Building Safety RDH:nh ROY B.WOOLSEY JOSEPH ANGELO AOBERT L.THhTCMER RpBERT A. FOSTERS WILLUM G. SULLIVAN WOOLSEY, ANGELO & THATCHER LA'JJYERS . , 209fl SAN JOAOUIN HIlLS ROAD NEWPORT CENTEq NEWPORT BEACN, CALIFORNIA 92660 November 29, 1977 Newport Mesa Investors 2750 So. Harbor Blvd., Suite C Santa Ana, CA 92704 Attention: Mr. Larry E. Nelson Re: Dear Mr. Nelson: Drainage through 750 iVest 17th Street, Costa t�esa - AREA CODE )i♦ 640-OBOO I represent Ruth B. Kebow who ocans the property at 769-773 Necoton Nay, Costa Mesa, near your subject property, and I have read your letter of November 10, 1977 to Carl R. Stevens, copy to Ruth B. Johnson, who is now Ruth B. Kebow. Mrs. Kebow's property has drained through your prop- erty for many years and, in my opinion, she has an estab- lished propezty right in the continuance of that drainage. Mrs. Kebow is not required to take precautions with respect to the drainage. In building on your property, you are not permitted to interfere with the drainage of natural flood waters coming across or originating on her property and draining through your property. You and others interrupting this drainage will be liable for damages caused by any inter- ruption of this drainage. It is requested that you advise us promptly of the plans with respect to this drainage. matter. RBW:EH Please have your attorney call me concerning this Very truly yours, . . 9„ -� -s /v '``��`'� Roy B. woolsey cc: City of Costa Mesa - attention rir. Richard D. Hanhart, Director of Building Safety, P O Box 1200, Costa r.qesa 92626 - regarding Permit 44095 Mr, J. E. Riggins, Riggins Construction, 12791 Newport Blvd., Suite 1, Tustin, CA � Mrs. Ruth B. Kebow .S, January 3, 1978 Mrs. Ruth Kebow 221 Nata Ave. Newport Beach,.Californla 92660 Re: Drainage through 750 Weat 17th Street Costa Mesa, California Dear Mrs. Kebow: After meeting with Mr. Richard Hanhart, Mrs. Carl Stevens and you, at the Building Department office in Coata Mesa, I feel that our position is pretty clear at this point. We are willing to help you solve your problem by allowing you acceas or giving you an easement across the north end of our property to alleviate your drainage problems. I believe that the Building Department made it clear that it is your responsibility to take care pf the work �.� and that there are approximately thre� alternatives to solve the problema.: 14ao of them require drainage across our property in some type of fashion, either underground ar surface, however, I am going to repeat the comment made in a previous letter "once we have paved our parking lot in the back you will no longer be able to underground your drainage at �the north end of our property" i� If we can be of any further help, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely; NEWPORT-MESA INVES ORS { l. Lar`�Nelson, General Partner LEN/ca � cc: Richard Hanhart, Director of Building Safety �' �, C I T Y O F C O S T A M E S A � INTER OFFICE MEMORANDUM January 12 , �g 78 TO Dick Hanhart FROM R. R. Campagna Director Building & Safety City Attorney Re: DRAINAGE PROBLEM (STEVENS property at 765 Newton Way) and New Construction at 750 West 17th Street, builder Larry NELSON, Permit No. 44095. Mrs. Carol Stevens was in to see me on January 11, 1978 about a recurring drainage problem on her above rental property. She says when they built their improvements about 6-7 years ago the City required them to drain their property to Newton Way but that they could not interfere with "natural drainage" across the back of their parcel. The natural flow is such that almost�all adjoining properties drain across the back of their parcel. Now, City has allowed Nelson to develop his property on 17th (in back of their parcel) and put in a block wall and drain his parcel to nearby storm drain. His grade level will be about four feet higher than theirs. The result is --.backup and ponding of all the water from the surrounding area now flows across and down their parcel to Newton Way -- causes floodinq and mud in their buildings on parcel. Though she "intimated" that City might be NEGLIGENT in what it has done here, she is primarily concerned with protecting their parcel. Says she has,discussed this with you, County Flood Control o£ficials, etc. Believes she has two alternatives: 1.• Pipe and drain in back of Nelson's parcels to same storm drain he is tying into at their expense and maintenance. 2. Put up block wall to stop other parcel's drainage across their land (much cheaper). Says you have advised her both of these methods are acceptable. Told her I would have to check into facts and it may be thateher problems are primarily with adjacent owners and not City. , Would appreciate your advising me of your version of this situation so I can see if City is exposed to liability or are we merely talking about problems between adjacent landowners. We MAY have exposure to ��, liability here (???). �CS.u`L. `cQ__��lf�i�C� �RRC:v cj I�- • lU l.� l�Vrl� �o v�s � `� Cs� w��.`.,,,e.,..,"� �— ��.,.� cc: Fred Sorsabal �-�jd-�-� �W'�^�� Jim Eldridge .�.�'�� -�� c crJ � C�t-%O � �.i.- # 7�- S/ -j-l�.w,"[ 5�ow t�. � a..�v .�. o�.r�r t i Z.��' I�� .'� 1��Ai CALIFOeTNIA 92828 P.O. BO% 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE C1TY ATTORNEV Decemb2r 15, 1976 Re: VICTORIA STREET WIDENING PROJECT; Potential Legal Liability Therein. To: Ashok K From: Paul O. City Attorney's Office Legal Opinion Basargekar, Associate Civil Engineer Poindexter, Laca Clerk FACTS You have raised the question of whether the design of the Victoria Street widening project (A.H.F.P. Project 870), and particularly the sur�ace coater drainage features thereof, will result in an unreascnable risk of legal�liability to the City. ; You indicate that, at present, approximately 15 acres of run-off water � from developed and undeveloped land drains onto Victoria Street. The run-off is carried from Canyon Drive to the west along Victoria Street. Ultimately, it is disposed of through existing aspnalt concrete s:aales along the shoul3ers of Victoria Street into existing ponds and undevel- oped land ocaned by State Mutual Savings and Loan Association north and south of Victoria Street. You indicate that your design concept will not aporeciably change the exis:ing drainage pattern. Asphalt concrete swales will be con- strucLed along the new roadway shoulders to drain the street run-off int0 areas north and south of Victoria Street, similar to existing conditic:�s. Neither the total run-off nor the drainage area 'vi111 be increased. The existing street grades will be flattened to some extent, resulting in reduced velocity of flow and increased time of concentration. Additionally, a new storm drain will be added on Victoria Street, which wi11 carry some water directly into the flood control channel. DISCUSSION The question which is pos�d raises tne following two 1=ga1 issue=: 1 2 The state of the law in California, as it regards liability for changes to surface water drair.age. Governmental i:ru-runities availab�e �o public entities for the design of public imnrovement projects. aor .�17`Y QF COSTA NiESA, CAt ORNIA �Legal Opinion ( �' P�ge Two Continued i^�ater Law 0 Decemlaer 15, 1976 The law caith respect to liability for surface water drainage has txaditianally been a curious admixture of differing legal theories having, especially.in the appropriation area, distinctly regional characters, all of which attempt to adjust the rights as between adjoining landowners to take, use or deposit water from, or upon nQighboring land. As is the case in many other areas of the laca, the first doctrines to emerge were rather formalized (and hence inflexible) statements of rights, which often lead to harsu results b�cause, while they were easy to administer, they failed to take into account individual differences in particular fact situations. The two major doctriaes of this kind were the CObL�lON ENEMY and the CTVIL LAS•7 rules. The COi✓n�fOv ENEMY rule, followed in about one-third of the states, holds that as an incident to the use of his own property, each landowner has an unqualified right, by operations on his own land, to fend off surface waters as ne sees fit without being required to take into account the consequences to other landowners, who have the rignt to protect themselves as best they can. The CIVIL LAW rule, followed in about one-third of the states, is diametrically opposed to the COMMON ENEMY doctrine. It recognizes an historical state of natural drainage as betcaeen adjoining lands, so that the lower owner must accept the surface �vater which drai�s onto his land but, on the other hand, the upper o�aner has no right to alter the natural system of drainage so as to.increase tfie burden. Because many jurisdictions found it undesirable to apply either of the above doctrines in their rigid or extreme forms, a t�ir3 rule, generally known as the RULE OF REASO?1ABLE USE has evolved,wfiich rule attemots to determine the rights of the parties with respect to the disposition of surface waters by an assessment o£ all the relevant factors. Such an approach has the virtues of flexibility al�d of acoiding tne harsh results which cccasio:ally �ay be reac:aed uhder extreme applicatioas of the other rules. California at one time followed the CIVIL LA6V rule, but as a result of the land mark case of KEYES VS ROMLEY, 64 CaI 2nd, 396 (1966), the California Supreme Court rejected the CIVIL LATd rule in favor of the RULE OF REASONABLE USE. The rule in KEYES was stated by the Court thusly: "It is therefore encus,bar.t upon every person to take reasonable care in using his property to avoid in;nry to adjacent prooerty through the =1orr of surface waters. Failure to exercise reasonable care may result in liability by an upper to a lower landowner. i •_ ��'I"Y QF COSTA MESA, CA� JRNIA "�Lega1 Opinion , , Page Three Continued It is equally with injury to waters to ta�Ce or reduce any � December 15, 1976 the duty of any person threatened his property by the flow of surface reasonable precautions to avoid actual or potential injury." From the above statement of the rule currently applied in California with respect to the liability for surface water drainage, it would appear that the design concept for tfie Victoria Street widening project would meet the basic test of "reasonableness", in that the existing drainage pattern, amount, and velocity of flow will not be appreciably altereci, and may even be reduced to some extezt by cer- tain design features - notably the grade reduction and the insulation of an additional storm drain. GoveYnmental Immunity Of course, the above noted water law RULE OF REASONA3L£ USE applies to both private and public projects. But in addition; public entities have certain imr,iunities available to them in a given instance over and ! above (in this'case) an apparent].y salutary principaZ of black letter law. The.concept of governmental immunity recognizes that public entities, if they are to successful2y provide for tne HeaZth, Safety and Welfare of the public, must, of necessity perforn certain services. (i.e. police and fire,protection, public improvements, etc...) which involve a high risk of liability. Therefore, in order to insure that these vital services will be performed, governmental immunities are provided. Government Code §830.6 provides as follows: "Neither a public entity nor a public employee is liable under this chapter for an inju.ry caused by the plan or design of a construction of, or an improvement to public property where such plan or design has been approved in advance of the con- struction or improvement by the legislative body of the public entity or by some other body or employee exercising discretionary authority to give such approval or where such plan or design is prepared in conformity with standards previously so approved, if the trial or appellate court deter- mines that there is any substantial evideace upon the basis of which (a)reasonable public employee could have adopted the plan or design or the standards therefore or (b) a reasonable legis- lative body or other body or employee could have approved the plan or design or the standards therefore." a63 ''�CI'TY QF COSTA MESA, CAL JRNIA � ' � i��JZl �D1I110P ,... Page FOur Continued i Decenber 15, 1976 A reading of the cases decided under this code section since its adoption in 1963 reveals that the majority of cases involve traffic accidents wherein liability was claimed for negligent design of a street proximately resulting in injury. However, it would seen that a governmental agency, when acting under the police power with- out negligence (e.g. constructing public improvements which inci- dentaliy result in slight changes in water flow) wouid similarly be entitled to the immunity afforded by Government Code �830.6. In addition to the benefits afforded by the Keyes decision, and the apparent applicability o£ Government Code �830.6 to the instant case, one older CalifOrnia case, ARCHER VS CITY OF LOS AVGELES, 19 Cal 2nd 19 (1941), contains a strikingly similar fact situation to the ques- tion currently discussed. In Archer, the plaintiff sued defendants City which had straightened and widened a creek channe2, and constructed storm drains following the natural drainage but did not imorove the outlet of the creek to accommodate the increased flow to plaintiff's land. The court heid that there was no liability to plaintiff, whose land was flooded by overflow during a rain storm. Perhaps more importantly, Archer has been cited as an exception to the general rule that public entities may be liable, under Article 1, §14 of the CaTifornia Constitution, for public improvements which entitle an injured Landowner to recover for inverse condemnation (ALBERS VS f COU.TTY OF LOS A:]GELES, 62 Cal 2nd 250 (1965). Since, in the instant '• case, the likelihood of substantial damage to the State �iutual Savinqs and Loan property seems unZikely, the Iikelihood of a successful recovery for inverse condemnation would seem remote, and the Archer decision should be controlling. (See also GBAY zi5 RECLA,�IATION DISTRICT, 174 Cal 622 (1917]). CONCLUSION Based upon the above discussion, it is.the opinion of this office that the victoria Street coidening project, if carried out in a manner consistent with sound engineering pYactices, caould not create an undue risk of liability on the part oi the City. POP:cjr Respectfully submitted ROY E. JUNE, City Attorney By: 1�. � -�. Paul O. Poindexter, Law Clerk C� - Ap ro ed ao� CITY DF C�STA MESA CALIFORNIA 92826 P.O. BOX 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITV ATTORNEY February 1, 1978 .Ir and Mrs. Carl Stevens 2133 Orange Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92627 RE: DRAINAGE,.SURFAC& WATER (Iocated at t 765 Newton Way, Costa Mesa, CA and 750 West l7th Street; Costa Mesa - NELSONS and 769 Newton Way - KEBOW) Dear Mr. and Mrs. Stevens: This letter is being sent to the three landowners (Stevens, Nelson & Kebow) who seem to have a mutual problem of surface water drainage. I have in- quired into the situation and understand the following facts: The Kebow property was improved before the City begari imposing drainage requirements (i.e. each development must drain its own surface water to the nearest street or storm drain facility). Then the Stevens property was improved in compliance with that policy. Now the Nelson property is being improved according to said policy. Because of the natural topography in that area the Nelson's grade improve- ment is necessarily higher than before. He will install a block wall along the back of his property and take care of all his own surface water. The Stevens may also put up a block wall and take care oE their own surface water. The problem then is - it leaves Kebow's land to take care of their own suiface water. Obviously, the City cannot - nor a-iIl it - adjudicate or decid= whether "upstream" owner's such as Kebow have a prescriptive right to drain sur.- face waters across downstream lands. There appears to be no recorded easements so only a judicial Quiet Title action could decide those property rights. As far as exposure to liability by these several owners to each other we can only point to the California Supreme Court case KEYS VS. ROMLEY, 64 Cal 2nd 396. That holds that rights, duties and liabilities for surface water drainage will depend upon each landowner making a"reasonable use" of his land or improvements, including taking reasonable steps to avoid drainage. Again, absent a judicial decision on the facts here it is hard 77 FA(R DHfYE (7141 5565399 � ��.CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA � Mr. and Mrs. Carl Stevens Page Two continued February 1, 1978 to say what approach is "reaeonable". Believe it is up to all of you to take whatever steps are "reasonable" to allow each other to make a reasonable use of their own land. In my humble opinion, the City's drainage policy of requiring each landowner to be responsible for his own surface water is in itself "reasonable". Both Stevens and Nelson would satisfy this now. The Kebow property would have to establish this as "unreasonable" <or perfect an easement) and also that reasonable steps were taken to avoid damages. Seems to me the. most practical way to avoid the problem is as has been suggested - by layi:g v pip= across Ste•:ens 2nd :;el�on property to the ., cr� drain adjoining Nelson's parcel. If Stevens and Nelson both put up a block wall without taking care of Kebow's surface water they �(?) be held to be "unreasonable" under the circumstances and liable to Kebow in damages. Only a Court can decide. Trust each of you can see the merit in arriving at some mutually satisfactory arrangement.that allows each landowner the right to i.mprove his/her land without unresaonable burdens or costs to the other adjacent landowners. Our City will not participate in any such negotiations and merely seeks to have its development requirements met. Thanking you all for your anticipated attention and cooperation. Very truly yours, -= _..� � �_. '.,\ ,_,..::�; . `��i� � - -- � -- _ _— R. R. Campagna ' City Attorney RRC:k�b cc: Mr. Larry Nelson Mrs. Ruth Kebow Roy B. Woolsey, Esquire Richard Hanhart �/ March 14, 1978 Mr. Larry E. Nelson Mr. Richard J. Ranger Newport-Mesa Investors 2750 S. Harbbr Blvd., Suite C Santa Ana, Calif. 92704 Re: Draina�e, Surface W Costa Mesa, Ca., an Mesa, Ca. - Nelsons Gentlemen: (� � t 17th Stree CALIFORl11A COI�F • TEAA S ton Way, Costa bow) I have been asked by Mrs. Kebow to represent her in the above-mentioned drainage problem. I have accepted as she is my Mother-in-Law and this problem has been and sti11 remains confusing, frustrating, and so far most definitely expensive for her. Drainage problems are not new to me as I was at one time a construction super- intendent in charge of drainage for a medium-sized construction company, although it should be said that it was many years ago. After visiting the site during one of our latest downpours, it became quite clear that the problem is being compounded by the fact that with the change in elevation created by the grading on your property, Mrs. Kebow's property is now receiving and retaining all of the water generated by at least three or more of her neighbors (please see enclosed map). As you can no deubt appreciate, tne problem created for Mrs. Kebow is cor.mpler_ at best - if she builds a wa11 around the rear of the property and drains her water to the street, she produces a like probLem for her neighbors, as their lots would no longer drain. So it would seem in the best interests of all concerned, as well as those who in a11 probability don't even know that they are concerned, to meet and work out an equitable solution. 0 m � 0 T � m � 0 iC � A v D O � 0 v D r � D O � � A A O V -2- The only other alternative, which I am sure you would agree makes no sense, would be to have the courts dictate the final decision. With all this in mind, would you please call me at (213) 454-0371 sometime this week so that a meeting time and location caa be determined. Also, any thoughts you might have as to who else might be included would be helpful. Sincezely, �� '' �th C `_�" E. C. Burns ECB:bjm Enc. cc;►/Richard D. Hanhart Air. of Bldg. & Safety City of Costa Mesa P.O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Roy B. Woolsey, Esq. 2099 San Joaquin Hi11s Rd. Newport Center Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 R. R. Campagna City Attorney City of Costa Mesa P.O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Carl R. Stevens 2133 Orange Ave. Costa Mesa, Ca. 92627 ;'] j ;, t �; F'a � �. 1 . � ' • / '__ /rl --2 ��On -- ' a �. Ju[C ' / _ _ I I I � i � 0 1 [ 1 �^ a I _ , + � .i . �. ��i Moiwnn snui a<curt o . ros�t�o�i ��o�c�tfo r��o1 ' — — � TO 1UV IUCI OI IM1�0\IM[F15. 1. ftt ]' 1�0� �iIF �M� ��1Sf I oii� fuvr[o •l.s.11lE' n �it p t�It1 [0��[H u�:[t5 CinEo- Q � •IS[ �aifp. ,F I ]. f[i fl.l• 110� �Itf ��n Il��c� n�t• � V ��e--Q-.�� .r.' ��csa".v.r� :;rd''�:.7;:sn`. y i �.... ..i ••.�v I � � M O�JI'. iA�V!' /)1/'Ai�/ - ppp ISCtl' 9 ii(/f' ` —��~_' � !b! .��JN..w Oi..w �.i. . � � 1 '. .i � , � .., , ,� i � � _ y�i �..� g . ' ; .� R.�oao. {� . ,� ip d�4 0� ' / r �t 1/?��e � �; � ' O >l� /�i.c l ^NO'I:'JJ'/v � '' M1 , i uJ. N' 1 ; i. a �� _., i �'� � {� � � . y 8 i 'Z � y� i i l {r�7 \\-� Q' A �� . F � < i �:- � I �j'� /+r�� , g I, � � '%\:� ��I� ` — (1 � � \ t V : a \ !t,"I . . . � IOI�i1 0! M�i1Cl I�D [f�lrvtl� '� 8 S ♦ p . � . .• ��—�� , IfIM1e1I10�5 YMlI15 iI+(�- �. �. � h �� 6 '~ \�" � �.�' � 'i ^ i .. `� � �' \t ' C tl ` ^F� � ,L` / ._ YIS[ �JffO. � � � \ �' {�. . S. ILL �EtO�C WU15Ff �FfF9 10 �='�ti � 0 1_ , ' � i Te[ el1 CI �GiGtl IRS� fUCI i C }I ��ao�oco i. �ea. s. •�er i or — — � Y�3�, — � y� � I % . YIICIll�I11JY1 �1�� J! �I��uI `� ` V � h � ' �I , �' I/ t0Y\1I, 4ll{001�. Wl[55 •� � • � 0$ /�5�� , N ' /lS// ` . �y.'.' GIF[UII( �LIFD. a.� v� I l° c0 ' . �' p.� /'V' y. i''. .�� V` 0 iuq ti y . i •�,��/' `,^�� - . � F��, ' � $ ,tj � ! jt ♦ ' -- � ;nt� �` � �� . � ��11i � � i � �. ��fisar�t�+i.c � • . ` 1 �S . Q\ ' '( �' .� ti - . oi i, Z.� . . 1 J ? \ � � . 4 ' : - TYF 1E1�I�i ot ixf CFntfL G. � I �ssM' -/!SU' � rMp� ♦� :�� LI�F Of 1)tn 5i9E[t. p[ie0 ' I �l� V MUfix �9' ]d' )5' E�Si. �S -- 0 'p - ' _' �'1'� ; �V . SnOn 0� � �U 01 IUCI U. p - . \} �� ; ]101. �ff010FD 4 N0� 110. - e � . � ; p * y ' p� '� � I \ . , �I4[1 l�na Y 0! Mii[Fllb[Ou5 i 4. $ � n n � ^ _.� y MV$, 1[COIOf 1f OIl�4( fUU+tY. � - uura�n�. \ : .� � .:� . I; . .. � 11----- i- �� i I. t w . �_'e iszei___ iiaii� � W i�� ,,. E.,�,., � � � ` p ` �� . . � �I � : . � r: P: • 9�� 0 0 I� ��. .e ��; 'g � � o t} � g e// �(' . nl hl ti '♦ n � � /• ` � 2 � L.>' . � +.y,�� ti .O � _ � 2 ; . ��i � . . IL'O��i�S"N oTo<_j 4 ` � 'i:' i .�t i' � ..`' .l' � . . i t�' /oa0_ __ __ _. •�ts- ry , �` nJJ_ _ _+Si/__ .y " A � �: � r.��„m.�, o.�,,,:�,.,�.� ° �3 �' i��.....�..i iu<unu,i. � i I.� ♦ I /' . . +.; 2 , ; � �`v , =. � i i � i � � .2 W � � -- o .a � . I� �$ e. �. .' , � � / l� '� /, � 8 a � � y� r� l�' � U Y e M < ./�� I � ! f \ � �` I y \ y' ' ` $ / � � ? '. O � I Z. i � a I/ i� Iy . Q' -- �• e.ab» ? mwr•wu• 2 I � t i r �..eii r w..>a.• S� I� i ' , ..ei.� �v' so' r..S.� �J 0. �.dr�' e.un' i �; w � i ' . ,'� I � � �� i .2tF. I� 5 � � i.cn' �iia• rtra' srs.+' . . b W 1 .v w'J/Jl9v ifaM' .ve J�JSW i10�0' � `a �'`� UUUM ` q�,�;;•%,,;�~' , PLACENT/A ', . - �AVENUE � ;; ; �'" � - . . �...�....�.Jw�+� � _ , T Isrw.�.��'� lin:..n.y ..�r• isra+' J iisio' � y(/' l'J... SECURITY TIT E 1T7SURANCE C��tFAyyNDT.Er� AL.�a� f} '�''rrcTlQ/� �'I— IMII IIIi II IYSII�10 �f � Wfltl 1 IMIO�NAiIOX Onll. IMO ll�lll IN! 11L1 It [OWIlO�� Pt � , �14Y IMIOItl1110e kXILM MI IIUI �0 �: f0itlCl, �0 1I�11lIIl II �NYY1� �( fMtl ��. � - [OYqNI II lOIM 0041LIF{Sl 01 Iu01MI4�WIIG� A/��C-_ ,e;�.�3 �.r_7� 2. �}� �D b � -'p �. I' ��' fft= �i c.o[_�rc7' �6'� 1'7�5: ��Ow�'�' %"f�CP• .�.._ � City o( Costa Mesa Oevelopment Ser�ices Department Building Satety D'wision P..O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, California CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY' No. �t?3D21$ The Building located at 765 Newton WaV � � has been inspected and found to comply with the provisions of all City of Costa Mesa Ordinances applicable thereto for a Group B2 Occupancy. Use of Building Legal Description 429-081—Q6 ISee reverse side for Metes and Bounds) � Building Permit No.RMF.3R9R2 Electrical Permit No.RMF.3R�1R9 Plumbing Permit No. p 7q94d Mechanical Permit No. �� 38982 Number of apartments and/or guest rooms Fire Prevention �ermit No. F 39897 ISSUED TO-: . - Building Official �eOrqe. Edttil9ton ,-� G & N Exotic. Znc. 765 Newtoh Way by `�'��" ��Mzl�-r---_._ Costa Mesa;. CA 92626 Date Noveber' 9.. 1989 , This Certificat� of Occupancy SHALL BE posted in a conspicuous place on the premises and SHALL NOT BE removed except by the Building Official of the City of Costa Mesa under Sec. 307 (e) U.B.C. � � CMF 1015-46 rey, 1/83 White -Owner, Canary - Numerical File; Pink - Bldg. Permit File . � AOP�lcant to f111 in all sDaees except those within heavY boraer Iines antl sign all a0o�eoriate tleelarations. P RMI fyy.— TRACT NO. LOT NO. UNIT NO. CITY O,F, COS7A MESA T�"JJ},�/QT P/E,R�,c 4IT� ��., �Ej� a�,, � � n I � � �� A.P. # � � Project Address _�� [��/f��(G/�'�`f _ Applicant's Mailing ddress /� Owner's Name s .�- Pho y� 'Atldress � �F.. y�7CC%/� Arch/Eng. Licenu No. Address Controctor's Nam u, c{.� Pho�� ss� Address (mailing) f�� .0 �[ifJ'� / lC�is'! ��( Ciry License No. � �7�r3 LICENSED CONTRACTOR DECLARATION I M1ereby af(irm that I am licensetl untler provisionz o( Cha�te/ 9(comm¢nCin9 with Section 7000) of OiviSion 3 of the Busine55 antl Protessions Cotle, antl ' my license is In 1 fo.ce and eifect. �%�� Licens C�lass�s Lice No.��%� Date�—_[.�.� Signature � � WORKERS'COMPENSATION DECLA0.AT1 N I hereby affirm tnat I have a certificate of consent to self-insure or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance, or a certifietl cop]� thereof -(S/ection 3800, Lab. C�Qs��r�fj Co P Y�„ O"'�[r/�Y Policy No. � Q �Certitietl wpy is hereby fumishetl. .- ' •� Certitietl copy is filetl with the city Builtling Division., ^ Date �Applicant ' ''�•' EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMPEfJSATION DECLARATION (This section neea not be mmpleted i( the permit is tor one huntlred ($300) or less). i _ I certify [hat in Ihe pe�Po�mance ot the work tor wbich this pe�T�t is issuetl 1 sball not employ any person in any m5nner so as to'become subject to t�e workers' Comvensation Laws ot Calitornia. - Oate � Si9nature NOTICE: If, after making.[his tleclaration, you shoultl berome subject to tne Workers' Compensation provisions of the labor Cotle, you must torthwith comply with sucn provisions or this Oermit shall be tleemetl revoketl. CONSTRVCTION LENOING AGENCV 1 nereby affirm tnat there is a consV uction lentling agency for tne per(ormance of the work for_, whicn this Oermit is� issuetl (Section 3097 Civ. C.) Lentler's Name Lentler's Aatlress OWNER BUILDER DECLARATION " I hereby atfirm,lhat I am exempt from tne Contractor's License Law for the following reason (Section �031.5 Business antl Professional Cotle: Any uty or '. county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, tlemolish or repair any structure, orior to its issuance, alw requires tne aoP�icant for such oermit 'to file a signetl statement that he/she is Iicensetl pursuant to the provisions ot tM1e Con[ractor's License Law (Chapter 9(commencing with Section 7000) of Divisiom 3 ot [he Busines5 antl Professions Cotle) or that h¢/She is exempt therefrom antl the basis for ine allegetl exempfion. Any vlolation ot Sectlon ]031.5 by any applicant fo� a�permit subjects lhe applicant to a clvil �enalty of not more than five huntlretl tlollars ($500). 1,'as owner of the property or my employee5 witit wages as their sole compensation, will tlo the work, antl the structure iz not�intentletl or offeretl tor sale (SeCtion 7044, BuSinesS antl PrOfessional Cotle: The Contractor'S �icense Law tloes not apply to an owner ot a property wno Ouiltls or improves thelt=on, and who tloes such work himselt/herself or through his or her own empioyees, provitletl tha[ such improvements are not intentletl or offeretl for sale. I�, �owever, the bulltlin9 or imOrovement is soltl within one year ot com- pletlon, the owner will have the burtlen of proving he/she tlitl not builtl or im- p�ove for the pu�pose of Sale). ❑ I, d5 OWl1¢! Of the plop¢Yty� dRl ¢xCIUSiV¢ly COOitdCtlllg Wifh IiCE052tl COO- tractorsto const�uctthe project (Section ]044, Bu5ine55 antl Profe55ions Cotle: The Contractor'S License Law tloes not apply to an owner of propertv who builtls or improves thereon. antl who contracts for such oroiects with a r.�n- tractor(s) Imense pursuanc to me Contraccor•5 License Law). I am aware tha[ proof o( their Worker's Campensation insurance sM1oultl be provitled to me. ❑'I am exempt untler Settion B. & P. C. tor this reason Oate • � Owner -I hereby certiTy tnat-1 have reatl this applicatlon antl state that tne above Information is correct. I aqree to comply with all city antl county ortlinances antl state laws relating to builtling construction, and h¢reby autM1o�ize /ep�e- 5entatives of lhis city to ente upon the above-mentionetl propert �or inspectio � es. ,� , � TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION LI NEW U ADD.L� qLTERATION U REPAIR ❑ CONVERSION ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ OTHER DESCRIPTION OF WORK/USE OF BLDG. TVPE OF PERMIT LJ GRAOING ❑ TENANT �LECTRICAL ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5(i. FT._ CONSTRUCTION TVPE_� ZONE GRF Remarks: � Ij �� Bar Sink Backflow Preventer _ Backflow Irrigation ;'.� Bathtubs s:? Drinking Fountains Floor Drains Floor Sinks Gas Service Outlets Interceptors Kitchen Sink Lavatories P—Trap Roof Drains . Reinspection Fee � $15 Duct�- Under Ground Duct-Strucnrel � Duct-Ventilating 0$E! Exhaust System ❑ Multiple Firepl/Fact. Blt. iCBO # Heating System & Ducting ❑0�100,000 BTU�1100,000 Signature� /� _ Da � ' Drivers' License or 55 � �`-�� I I Reinspection Fee OB65-46, rev. 5/88 White - Builtlinq; Canary - qpplicant; Pink - Accounting; Goltlenrotl - Assessor $15 J FOUNDATIO�N j�STRUCTURAL PLUMBING �Q MECHANICAL OCCUP VALUATION $ NGCU.VOS. A( Showers Service Sink � Sewer Cap Sewer Connection Solar Collecmrs SOlar Piping � Solar Tank Swimming Pool w/Spa Urinal Water Closet Water Heater Water Service -Au[o-Wash ' Laundry Trays Issue Fee .Hood or Typel ❑ Canopy Type I I ❑ Refrigeration System ❑0-100,000 BTU ❑100,000 BTU Sysrem Repair/Alteration Fire Dampers Registers • Issue Fee S Main Buildi E T Front A Rear (� C Pight K . Left S Ping. Ref. # . Planning Notes: i � 7 • � � — /) f I� : • �/ — � 1 �. �� • I�A�,� • 4� rc�I�� FEES Auromatic Washer Canstruction Pole Sub. Cooking Unit �. Dishwasher $ 3 FEES Fan F.A.U. Fixtures Device Boxes Outlets Switches Garbage Dispoul Generator �0-5 KW ELECTRICAL Transtormer ❑ 15-50 KW ❑ 50+KW Meter Dup to 100 amps Meter ❑over100amps'� Sub Panel � � e Motors -1 HP �YY: - 8 IncSolar 09-15 HP �16-15+ Microwave . Pole Light Gannn 1/ �.� . 5-15 K W I Reinspection Fee ' $15 DEVELOPMENTSERVICESREQI 2aning Appravad By Building Apptoved By Aoolication laued Bv Sign Standing Sections Trash Compactor - � Issue Fee FEES � SUMMA V OF FEES ' BUILDING PEFiMIT $ g=� SMIP �' $ D�� PLAN CHECK $ PERMIT, �� PLUMBING $ ISSUANCE $ PLAN CHECK 25% $ ENERGV P.C. $ ELECTRICA� $ ��.,�GRADING $ PLAN CHECK 50% $ ��}T'L� MICROFILM $ �//.��i,-�-,��v MECHANICAL $ �!L'�— TOTALFEE $ '�= PIAN CHECK 25% $ oi aaoa��83-ap�35785 �sc��r � ;-;.� 6ATE: flbl'�L�:!S3. 7tl9'c: t1:25 . . . . . . ., .w� .. . ... . . . . . . _ �r . . . . . . . :. . . v . . � � ` J � �t� � CONSTRUCTION AND PLANNING = �'� POOL & SPA � , �� APPROVALS Permit # Date Inspector ' qPPROVALS Permit.# �- ' _ Date Inspector .r • ��'t: Tempoiary Electrical Service or Pole 52. Pool & Equipment Location -� . - ^ 2. Soil Fipe-Undr md. � "! g .�" ,. � �,+ 53. Steel Reinforcement 3. Elecvical Conduit Utility-Undrgrnd. -: 4. Forms � 4. Elect�ical Conduif-Undrgrnd. �� . Electrical Bonding �• - 7. .. �5�SteeGReinforcemenC .,� ;-}a 56. Rough Plumbing & Pressure Test t' ��' .. 6. Electrical UFER�Grnd. / 57. APPROVAL TO COVER-GUNITE �� , . �. Z. �Footings� , �; � �. ,�j 4q � 58. Electrical Conduit-Undrgrnd. - 7i �'8�'Foundation , y 59. Gas Pipe, O Undrgrnd., Test � �.�� 9_� Water Pipe-Undrgrnd. !�� 60. Backwash Lines, P-Trap, O Undrgrnd. 10�StructuralFloorSysYem �' � 8� � 61. APPROVALTODECK 11. Property Sewer��ine & House Connection �, 62. Backwash & Receptor-Final a r. . 72!Sewer Cap ,.' � , 63. Heater & Vent-Final �',� . 73. Roof�Drains ^ j � 64. Plumbing System - Finat � ' r'� 14. Rough Plumbing� 65. Electrical-Final �� 15. Rough Electrical-Conduit 66. Solar System-Final t .s :, 16' Rough Electric Wiring . 67. Fencing & Access Approval �17,: Rough Wiring Sign - . 68. APPROVED FOR PLASTERING ,, �18. Rough Electrical-T Bar Ceilin`g 69. POOL/SPA SYSTEMS FINAL 1,9. Rough Heating & Air Conditioning FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENT ,20�Rough Facfory Fireplace � APPROVALS Permit # � .'; 21 Ducts, in Structure "� 70. Underground Hydro � � . 22. Ducts, Ventilating- i '-�t � d l � 77. Product Piping O Gas ❑ Oil 23. Gas Pipe-Rough & Test �-V _� � 72. Underground Flush i� 24. Roof Framing j-t�R �� ' 73. Undergrnd. Storage Tank O Gas ❑ Oil � 25. Roof Sheathing ' �� . � � � 74. Overhead Hydro . 26. T-Bar Ceiling (Structural) &Monocoat . 75. Dry Chemical 27., Frame and F,lashing .?:� 76. Dry Standpipe 28. Lathing &'Siding �� 77. FIXED SYSTEM FINAL c a 29. Insulation '1 78. FIRE PREV. FINAL 30. Drywall Nailing � -� =� HEALTH DEPT. REQUIREMENT 31. Plaster Brown Coat ;, �-- 79. FINAL INSPECTION 32. Electrical Power Metei-Finaj-i 80. FOOD CERTIFICATE ISSUED . ��_ � 33 Final Electric �•�� - � Notes: �l "�� 34. Final Heating & Air Conditioning , •,1 � 35. Final Gas Pipe-Test �.- - �. � 36. Hood or Canopy � �•P . . "37. Final Factory„Fireplace` ,. .38. Firial Plumbing �;.� : � � �-� •39. Water Service-Final .,- . . i 40. Ga'_s Service-Final_ ,=;� r '41. Solar pomestic-Final�-i�.' . . 42. Backflow Prevente f_ ' �;. -•,� �� • � i 43. Backflowlrrigatiom' ,; % � . - �, ,;;� .V i�) 44. Landscape Irrigation�System � � '�-+" `'� � � 45. Sound Attenuation �� l • , , � � � 46. Handicap flegulatioris�{ • ' �: � � 47. FINALSTRUCTURE&'BUILDING �� j � � ' 48. Special Requirements�, ompleted . -. , 49. Electric Release to Edison .,� .� .'�� . , , 50. Gas Release to Sou4hem California Gas Co - .. --. � � �o�i� •'i �r� . '51. CERTIFICATE OF-OCCUPANCY ' 'j , �' !' , i1 �� " •;� ; ;�� No. � Date - �� ,'' • .` '.->=Y--' rtd _ _ �� . �� ' Applitant to (III in all s0ates except tnose within heavy GorCer lines antl sign all aOD�opriate Ceclarations. t PERMIT NO. TRACT NO. LOT NO. UNIT NO. CITY oF,COSTfi'MESA�`� C'iJNS UCTION PE MIT 3� U ` n.p. � ' zone Project Address ___,_[,j • . S Main Building: /accessory Building: Z TVPE OFCONSTRUCTION NEW b ADD ALTERATION ' REPAIR ApplicanYS Mailin Addfe55 � ��' D f � • ❑ CONVERSION ❑ DEMOLISN -❑ OTHER T Front p Owner's Name �� TC-' Phone s� � DESCRIPTION OF WORK/USE OF BLDG. _ I A Rear ' ' . N Address - � � Arch/Eng. License No. � TVPE OF PERMIS GRAOING FOUNOATION STRUCTURAL �i:K Right ' G Address �'TENANT ❑ ELECTRICAL PLUMBING O MECHANICAL ' S� Left . ' - � � q, ContractOr'S Name Y 1Z^ 1 �,,1 Pho,enS�y � � �OTHER • � . . � ,�/ S ' Ping. Ref. #� ' Parking Req./Provided E Address (mailingl�� +�+�� u�T' 11.\ uX PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5c�. FT. - oCCUPAryyv . r planning Notes: � � ' M � CONSTRUGTIONTVPE � .�VALUATION$='c'��a� , T CityLicenseNO..__ ��3 20NE � GRADINGCU.VDS. ACRES '$, UCENSEO CONTf3ACTOR DECLARATION - , � I hereby.affirm that I am licensetl untle� provislonsof Charte� 9(commentlng Remarks: ' � with section 1000) oi Division 3 of the Business antl Protessions Cotle, antl ' . my license is In Iwi. rce antl efiect // � ' ELECTRICAL � FEES Licens CI j5 iC�,q� No. y��Z �� Date� �/" g 59 t l�b�tJ PLUMBING� FEES AummaticWasher Trensformer ❑ 15-50KW � WORKERS' COMGENSATION DECLARATIO � . Const�uctiOn POI¢Sub. ,� 50+KW � I hereby affirm tllat I have a celtificate of consent to selt-in5ure or a ce![ificate 82f SiOk . ShOWEIS of Workers' Compensation Insurance, or a certitietl mpy thereof (Section � . Cooking Unit Meter �up ro 100amps 3800, L.ab. �y) Cp pp � / _/' Backflow Preventer Service Sink � � - -- Poiicy No. J�S p/ 9�—DO Company Yf�� N�=f ' � gackFlow Irrigation Sewer Cap �'� Di'shwasher � Meter ❑over 100 amps � {�'Certifietl copy is hereby tumishetl. /� 'Di,yers ❑Gas ❑Eiectric Sub Panel U Cer 'W/'e d c y i witn the city Bulf�ydq,piv Bathtuhs � Sewer Connection Date:_4!'_��_� Applicant /Orr/ . . Fen ' •• ' EXEMPTION F0.0M WORKERS' COMPENSATION ECLARAT Cldrifi¢r5 SOlar COII¢CtOfS Motors OO-1 HP O1 %- 8 �Tnissection neetl not be wmple[etl if tne permit is for one huntlreC ($100) or , , F.A,U. � Ini. Solar �9-75 HP �16-15+ ' less). ' Dishwasher Solar Piping � I certify that in the perfo�mance Ot the work fo� whiclt this permk i5 issuetl, I � . 'Fi%ttl�¢5 ' Microwdve shall not employ any pe�son in any manner So as to become subject to the Drinking Fountains $Old� Td�k � ' Workers' ComOensalion Laws of California. �DBvice Boxes • Pole Li ht ' Date Signature Floor Drains ' Swimming Pool w/Spa � 9 NOTICE: If, afte� making this tlecla�ation, you shOultl become subject to [he �O�t12tS Rdn ¢ � Workero' Compen5ation p�ovisions o( the Labo� Cotle, you must forthwith FI00� Sinks .. Urinal � 9 mmply witn sucb pwvisions or this permlt shall be tleemetl revoketl. CONSTRVCTION LENDING AGENCV GaSServiCe �/ . Outl2t5 . WaterCloset $WitCheS Sign � I hereby aflirm that the�e is a conrt�uction lentling agency (or thC performanGe . or me work for which tnis permit is issuea �Section 3097 Civ. C.) Interceptors Water Heater Garbage Disposal Standing Sections . • Lentler's Name � � Lenaer's a.daress �� Kitchen Sink � � Water Service V� Generator �65 KW �5-15 KW Tresh Compactor . OWNER BUILDEft DECCARATION � � - , . I hereDy affirm lhat I am exempt from the Contfactor'S li[en5e Law to! tbe LdvdtOfiCS ' AUtO-WdSh ' � � following reason (Section 7031.5 Business antl Professional Cotle:'Any city or munty which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, tlemolish or repair p—Trap LaufStlry Trays � - any sVucture, prior to'its issuance, al5o requires the applican[ for such permit to file a signetl statement that he/sh¢ is IirenSetl Pu�suant to the provi5ions ot R001 D�dinS �1' the Contractor'S License law (Chapter 9(mmmencing wiro Section 7000) of Division 3 of fhe Business antl Profe55ions Code) or that he/she i5 exempt - ; Y RBiD5p9tt100 F¢B $1�J� ISSU¢ Fe@ $ 3 Iherefwm antl the basis to� the allegetl exemption. Any violation of Sectlon ' . � .]031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjec[5 [he applicant to a civil ' ' penatty of not more than five hunmed tlouars (ffiSo0). DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REQUIREMENTS: � ❑ I, as owner ot the oroperty or my employees witn wages as meir sole . Reinspection Fee . $15 - Issue Fee $ 3 . Za�ing Approved By Date �compensation, will tlo the work, antl [he s[ructure is not intentletl or offeretl �- - " (or sale (Section �044, Business antl Professional Cotle: The Contractor's MECHANICAL ' ,FEES � Building Approved By ��• Date License Law tloes not appy to an owner o� a properry who builtls or improves � thereon, antl who tloes such work himself/h¢rs¢If or througn his or h¢r own _ - AppliUtiO� ISSUBd By - Data �' � �•� employees, provitled tnat such improvements are not intentletl or offeretl tor Boiler . ` Hood or Type I ❑ , � sale. If, however, the builtlin9 or improvement is soltl within one year ot com- . Canopy Type II ❑ SUMMARV OF FEES � pletion, �the owner will have tne burtlen of proving he/she tlitl not builtl or iT- DUCL - Und¢� i�iroUOd . � !�� prove for the purpose ot sale). BUILDING PERMIT $ SMIP $ U I, as owner ot the property, am exclusivery contracting with licensetl con- Duct-Structurel '. Refrigeratfon System - PLAN CHECK �$ PEFMIT tractorsto const�uct the project (Section ]044, Business antl Prote55ions Cotle: � . � - The ConVacior's License taw tloes not appry to an owner o� property who Duct- Ventilating � ❑0-100,OOOBTU ❑700,000 BTU PLUMBING $� ISSUANCE ' $ builtls or improves lnereon: antl who cont�act5 Tor such oroiects wi[b'a con- - - �' � tractor(s1 Imense pursuanc m�ne conVa<tors License Law). I am aware that ' PLAN CHECK 25% $ ENERGY P.C. $ proof of their Worker'S Compensa[ion insurance shoultl be provitletl to me. ExheuSt $y5t¢rtl ❑ MWtiple ❑ . System Repair/Alteration ELECTRICAL $ GRADING $ ❑ I am exempt untler Section B. & P. G(or this reason Firepl/Paci. BIt �CBO #' Fire Dampers � MICROFILM $ � PLAN CHECK 50°� $ Date � - owner � Heating System & Ducting - Registers _ MECHANICAL $ --] �� I hereby certify that I have �reatl this application-antl state that the above ❑0.100,000 BTU 0100,0006T . � � � - ' TOTAL FEE $�J information is mrrect. I a9ree to'comply with all city antl munty ortlinances PLAN CHECK 25% $ � antl sta[e IawS rela[in9�to builtling mnSGuction, antl hereby authOtize repre- sentatives o( [hi5 cily t0 ent upon the above-mentionetl prope�ty fo� � inspection es. ' , Signature �.OoI9 Date�//-�9 , ' ' . . , DriveR' License or 55 �� Reinspection Fee $15 � Iwue Fee $ 3`. . . 0865-46, �ev. 5/88 Wnrte - tlwipmg; Canary - Applicant; Pink - ACcounting; GOItl¢nrOtl - ASsesso� " • ' ' � "= a •�iv U!'T�: Oi/11/84 ?Ih".E� f0:1q � . . �! l.� I � i � ._ ; . . , _ . . , , _„ . .. , . CONSTRUCTION AND PLANNING �� POOL & SPA - f�1PPROVALS Permit# Date,, Inspector p�ppROVALS Permit# Date Inspector ri. Temporary Electrical Service or Pole �I 52. Pool & Equipment Location 1 � •"2. Soil Pipe-Undrgrnd. .�- �� 53. Steel Reinforcement �� 3. Electrical Conduit Utility-Undryind. �:� 54. Forms � ' 4: �Electrical Conduit-Undrgrnd. �' 55. Electrical Bonding . it"" : 5.iSteel�Reinforcement � � 56. Rough Plumbing & Pressure Test /�ry-'< ' 6.' Electrical UFER Grnd.' �; , 57. APPROVAL TO COVER-GUNITE �f� n, ;,�--7.:F,00tings � "' '+ �-;, 58. Electrical Conduit-Undrgrnd. �;' 8! Foundation '� � `: 59. Gas Pipe, � Undrgrnd., Test LL ' ' 1N � . • � �� 9.' Water Pipe-Undrgrnd. �,j -�� 60. Backwash Lines, P-Trep, O Undrgrnd. 10.�Structural Floor System '� •; .�' 61. APPROVAL TO DECK 11..Property Sewer Line�& House Co�nection ,r �i -62. Backwash & Receptor-Final 12.±Sewer Cap - � _ , ` 63. Heater & Vent-Final '- - l 13. Roof Drains � • � 64. Plumbing System - Final c'� 14. Rough Plumbing� � 65. Electrical-Final �✓ � 75. Rough Electrical-Conduit 66. Solar System-Final 16 Rough Electric Wiring 67. Fencing & Access Approval 1�� Rough Wiring Sign 68. APPROVED FOR PLASTERING 18: Rough Electrical-T Bar Ceiling.'J• 69. POOL/SPA SYSTEMS FINAL 19� Rough Heating & Air Conditio�ing ' FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENT 20. Rough Factory Fireplace �.� APPROVALS Permit # , 21-'Ducts, in Structure 70. Underground Hydro ' 22. Ducts, Ventilating -=.� � 71. Product Piping � Gas ❑ Oil 23: Gas Pipe-Rough & Test ,_ 72. Underground Flush 24. Roof Framing_ ,;,t� 73. Undergrnd. Storage Tank O Gas ❑ Oil 25. Roof Sheathing ` 74. Overhead Hydro 26. T-Bar Ceiling (Structural) & fVlonocoat 75. Dry Chemical 27.. Frame and Flashing ' 76. Dry�Standpipe 28. Lathing & Siding 77. FIXED SYSTEM FINAL _ 29. Insulation 78. FIRE PREV. FINAL ' 30. Drywall Nailing -�i HEALTH DEPT. REQUIREMENT - � � 31. Plaster Brown Coat `�•; 79. FINAL INSPECTION 32. Electrical Power Meter-Final 809 FOOD CERTIFICATE ISSUED 33. Final Electric Notes: ;7 ,�'/ �9 UNe��no �uQ9`'� 34. Final Heating & Air Conditioning '�� d(� �. �� 35. Final Gas Pipe-Test 6 �� 36. Hood or Canopy 37. Final FactorY Fireplace 38. Final Plumbing 39. WaterService-Final 7�r��q G��-+ . 40. Gas Service-Final . 41. Solar pomestic-Final • 42. Backflow Preventer � 43. Backflow �rrigation � �� c 44. Landscape Irrigation System • . 45. Sound Attenuation � 46. Handicap Regulations ' .,..! 47. FINAL STRUCTURE & BUILDING � ,�' 1 '{ , 48. Special Requirements Completed J; � 49. Electric Release to,Edison , . i + r- �. ! � 50. Gas Release to Southern Califomia Gas Co -�� . J' 51. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY �..,;� 1 No. Date , � �T.��-- � r Applicant to fill in a11 sDaces eaceot those within heavy bortler Iines antl sign all appro0��ate tleclarations. CITY 9F COSTA ME/SA CIOfN'STRUCTION {E�RMIT oFanniT tin i Tancr n�n 1(1T NO i �nii� Project Address ��^5 �.�-% ' j�L'�:.�F� _ Applicant's Mailin ress Owner'sNa�mJu� ��AA/�1 it.. ph e�y� Address C (/.�S 1� u..�iLC�T /(��iv(� Arch/Eng. � � License No. ' Address � Contractor's Nam �y// �-, Pho g Address (mailin9l�� 2S - /f_L6ea �V � � City LicenseNo. 7 �3�`p LICENSED CONTRACTOR DECLARATION I hereby attirm that,l am licensetl untler provisions ot Charter 9(commencing with section ]000) of Division 3 of Ihe Business antl Professions Cotle, antl my Iicense is i U�orc a y. fiecL /��`� Licen lass .-tiee b. fe � Date� �� 59 t WORKERS' COMPEN ATION DECLARATION � ' I hereby atfi�m that I bave a[ertificate ot con5ent to 5¢I/-in5ure o� a C¢rtiticate oi Workers' Compensation Insurance, or a certitietl cooY thereof (Sectlon 38�0, lab. C. .y " Policy No. �� / �� % Company �� f�� / eCertifietl copy is hereby furnishetl. ' Cer "ye y i with the city Byjjtl'ng irision. �� / Date � Applicant �� EXEMPTION FROM ORKERS' COMPENSATION DEGLARATION (This sectiOn neetl not be completetl it the pe�mit is to� One huntlretl ($300) or less�. I ce�tify tha[ in [he performance ot tM1e wo�k fOr which Ihis pe�m�t i5 i55uetl, 1 snall no[ employ dny person in any manne� so as to become subjec[ to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. Date Signature NOTICE: If, att¢r making this tleclara[ion, you ShoUltl b¢COmE Subject to the Workers' Compensation provisions of [he Labor Cotle, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or tnis permit, shall be tleemetl revoketl. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCV I hereby aifirm that there is a constru<tion lentling agency for the.performance of the work for which this permit is issuetl (Section 3097 Civ. C.) LenEer's Name Lentler's Atltlress OWNER BUILDEN DECLARATION ' I hereGy affirm ihat 1 am exempt from the Contracror•5 License Law for the following reason (Se<tion 7031.5 Business antl Professional Cotle: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, tmprove, tlemolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for suth permlt to file a signetl statement that he/she is licensetl pursuant to the proviswns of tM1e Contractor4 License Law (CM1apter 9(commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business antl Professions Cotle) or that he/she is exempt therefrom and the basis for the allegetl ezemption. Any violation of 5ection 7031.5 'by any applicant for a permit subjects the ap0licant to a civil �enalty of not more tnan five huntlretl tlollars (5500). - I, as owner of the property or my employees wi[h wa9es as their sole compensation, will tlo tne work, antl the sVucture is not intentletl or_offereG for sale (Section 7044, Business antl Protessional Cotle: The Contractor'S License Law tloes not apply to an owner of a property who builtls or improves the�eon, antl who tloes such wotk ItimSelf/he�selt o� throu9h his or her Own employees, provitletl that su<h imorovements are not intentletl or ofteretl for sale. If,'however, the builtling or improvement is soltl witbin one year of com- pletion, the ownei wlll have the burtlen ot provin9 ne/she tlitl not builtl or im- provefortne purpose of sale). ❑ I,�as'owner ot the property, am exclusivery contractin9 with licensetl con- t�actorsto conSVuct the project (Section ]044, Business antl Profe55ion5 COCa: The Contractor's License law tloes not apply to an owner of property who builtls or improves thereon. ana who wntracts for such oroiects witn'a con- Srattor(s) license pu/suant to �ne ConVacto�'s LicenSe Law). I am aware thai proof o1 [hei� Wo�ke�'s Compensation insurance shoultl be provitletl to me. ❑ I am'exemp[ untler Section B. & P. C. for this reason Date � Owner I nereby certiry tha[ I have reatl tnis application anC state that [he�above information is correcL,l agree to comOty with all tlty antl county ortlinances antl state laws relating to builtling cons�yttlon; antl hereby authorize repre- Senlatives of this city t0 enter Qo he above-m�tionetl properry for/ inspection pur ' {/� �� fj? / Signature Oate . Drivers' L: TYPE OF C�NSTRUCTION L.J NEW U ADD LJ ALTERATION LJ REPAIR .❑ CONVERSION ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ aTH .� DESCRIPTION OF�WORK/USE OF BLDG. � � / TVPE OF PERMIT LJ GRADING LJ FOUNDATION LJ STRUCTV RAL '�❑ ENANT n`� -ELEC/T�(5/� I�C�AL n`�a'`�UMBING ❑ ANICAL THER ��/ (i[•Vai'L=� r ,L'.I'C'r � ' - I� PROJECT DESCRIPTIO SQ.FT. ocCUPANCV� CONSTRUCTIONTVPE ' VALUATION$�[�j 20NE GRA�INGCU.VDS. ACR 5_ Remarks: �C' g� $6� ^ , y &� xqiiw �.�LLI' S/ � , C � ///— 9'.s . • Bar Sink Backflow Preventer Backflow Irrigation Bathtubs Clarifiers Dishwasher ' Orinking Fountains Floor Drains FloorSinks . Gas Servic.e Outlets <itchen Sink Lavatories . Roof Drains Sf10WCf5 Service Sink Sewer Cap Sewer Connection Solar Collectors Solar Pipin9 Solar Tank Swimmin9 Pool w/Spa Urinal Water Closet Water Heater Water Service Auto-Wash Laundry Tra'ys s�.r. � S Main Buildi E T Front B Rear A C Right K . Left S Ping. Ref. # Planning Notes: FEES Automatic Washer Construction Pole Sub. Cooking Unit Dishwasher � Dryers ❑Gas ❑Electric Reinspection Fee ` $15 I �I Issue Fee � I $ 3 I � MECHANICAL FEES Boiler � Duct- Under Ground Duct - Strucmrel Duct - Ventilating Exhaust System ❑ Mul[iple Firepl/Fact. BIL iCBO dk Heating System & Ducting ❑4100,000 BTU 0100,0001 Hood or Typel� ❑ Canopy Type I I ❑ Refrigeration System ❑o-ioo,000sru ❑ioa,oc System Repair(Alteretion • ' Fire Dampers ' � ' Reinspection Fee I -$15 I I �' laue Fee-` ' j - I $ 3 0865-46, rev. 5/BB White - Builtling; Canary - Applicant; Pink - Accounting; Goltlenrotl - Assassor r� Fan F.A.U. Fixtures Device Boxes Outlets Switches Garbage Disposal Generator �0.5 KW Zone ELECTRICAL � ' Trensformer ❑ 15-50 KW ❑ 50+KW Meter �up to 700 amps Meter ❑over 100 amps Sub Panel Motors � P i HP � 1�- 8 InaSolar �9-'15 HP �16-15+ Microwave Pole Light Range I I Standing Sections 15 KW Tresh Compactor � Reinspection Fee �$15 � � Issue Fee DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HEQUIREMENTS: Zoning Approved By Buildine APProved By � APolication luuad Bv FEES $ 3 N I N G R E Q M T 5. - SUM(M�ARV OF FEES � � BUILDING PERMIT $ 2-_( -OL� SMIP $ - .S� PLAN CHECK $ PERMIT PLUMBING $ ISSUANCE $ PLAN CHECK 25% $ ENERGY P.C. $ ELECTRICAL $ GRADING $ PLAN CHECK 50°h $ MICROFILM � $ �J MECHANICAL $ TOTAL FEE $ �,y= PLAN CHECK 25% $ ' � . � oi�oao,aiz�i-aoo4�20� �-rJ�r � A�.;t� LA�=: '0,°.,,23J84 TI19E: ?4:,ifi �� . . .. •',(_.. �- �" . . � CONSTRUCTION AND PLANNING POOL & SPA � � APPROVALS Permit # 'v Dat � Inspector p�ppROVALS Permit # Date Inspector � 1. Temp��ary Electrical Service or Pol� J�' 52. Pool & Equipment Location �� 2. So�Pipe-Undrgrnd. �L� � ��y '� 53. Steel Reinforcement ��,., . w. 3.�Electyical Conduit�Utility-Undrg nd�, ��, �.,f_ 54. Forms � ,t'� 4'�Elect iical Condu�,Undrgrnd. �, � �• 55. Electrical Bonding ��1 - 5.. Steel,�Reinforcement _:. '� 56. Rough Plumbing & Pressure Test ,�� n � , � 6.� Electrical UFER�G nd� �� J 57. APPROVAL TO COVER-GUNITE ��+ �� 7,..Foofings - �i��• : � � ?�� 58. Electrical Conduit-Undrgrnd. ; � �� 6� Fo�naation � � ^ �� 59. Gas Pipe, 0 Undrgrnd., Test � �_ J� n r /' :. 9/Water Bipe-Undrgryc�. �1 'f 'r 60. Backwash Lines, P-Trap, O Undrgrnd. 10-Structural Floor Sy iem � - � '� �� 61. APPROVALTO DECK - 11 ' Prope�ty Sewer Line & House Connection ^ ::t 62. Backwash & Receptor-Final � r �t 12. Sewer_C�ap ,�;;r " j�. �� 63. Heater & Vent-Final 13. Roof D� ins �,,;� '[� �% 64. Plumbing System - Final � 14. Rough �Plumbing� � . 65. Electrical-Final '�� 15. Rough Electrical=Cohduit � 66. Solar System-Final 18. Rough Electric,Wiring �: 67. Fencing & Access Approval �7: Rough Wiring''Sign G,:.J 68. APPROVED FOR PLASTERING 1.8: Rough Electrical-T Bar Ceilifig��. 69. POOL/SPA SYSTEMS FINAL � .a9. Rough Heating & Air Cond�tioriing � FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENT 20. Rough Factory��ireplace �' r APPROVALS Permit # � . :�. 21' DuCts, in Structure ,�� 70. Underground Hydro 22. Ducts, Ventilating �',/" 71. Product Piping � Gas ❑ Oil 23. Gas Pipe-Rough'& Test � 72. Underground Flush ' ..n-. 24. Roof Framing �; f?�• 73. Undergrnd.StorageTank �Gas ❑Oil .�- � ' 25. Roof Sheathing' ' �) 74. Overhead Hydro "i � .A_�' 26. T-Bar,;Ceiling (Structural) &'Monocoat ' 75. Dry Chemical /zZ ! r .t l � 27. Frame�and Flashing 4 76. Dry Standpipe 28. LatFiing & Siding _' 77. FIXED SYSTEM FINAL ,�/ �, (�-� .J �� i �, 78. FIRE PREV. FINAL ��( t.Ir 29. Insulation 30. Drywall Nailing ''/ �x;' HEALTH DEPT. REQUIREMENT i.. ..� 31. Plaster Brown Coat i� �� 79. FINAL INSPECTION �`I �l 32. Electrical Power Meter-Final 80. FOOD CERTIFICATE ISSUED ,,.� 33. Final Electric !j Notes: 34. Final Heating & Air Conditioning 35. Final Gas Pipe-Test 36. Hood or Canopy 37. Final Factory Fireplace 38. Final Plumbing 39. Water Service-Final 40. Gas Service-Final 41. Solar pomestic-Final 4% 42. Backflow Preventer ?•' � 43. Backflow Irrigation ' ' �� 44. �Landscape Irrigation System 45. Sound �Attenuation �i 1 46. Handicap Regulations � <;� 47. FINAL STRUCTURE & BUILDING 48. Special Requirements Completed 49. Electric Release to Edison /, �, 50. Gas Release to Southern California Gas Co �+� � n� 51. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY '' t� 4�' No. Date �.� � Project Addres� Lv Appiicant's Mailing Address Owner's Na/me Phon P'7� Address ,/�� + �� — Arch/Eng. License No. Address /� �� hC= Phon `�_ Contrecmr'S Nam � �q Addreulm "I� 1 1�7��%)'I� tl��/ � /�d''1 City License No. �%yl� � LICENSED CONTRACTOR DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensea untler provisions of Charter 9(�ommencinq witn uction 7000) of Division 3 of the Business antl Professions Cotle, antl my li<en5e is in ful/l� rce and eftect. Licens¢ Class �✓ • LicenseJ� ��z�u Date�,rj�' S'g i ��[�[/�L� WORKERS'COMPENSATION DECLARATION � I M1ereby atfirm tt%t I have a certilicate of consent to self-insure or a certificate of Worker5' Gbmpensatlon Insurance, or a certifietl cog y thereo( (Section 3800, Lab. CJ. r �.l�f— %�� -/% PolicY No. LD��—d � ComPanY �fI /C-rr /� (�I' T �tifietl capy Is hereby furnishetl. Ce�tlfiy0 co Is filEtl with the City u� ng Divi57yll Date '^y/Z � APplicant �� EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMFENSATION DECLARATION (Thissection neetl not be completetl if the permit is for one huntlretl ($300) or Ie55). 1 certify that In the performance o1 the work fo� which this perm�t is i55uetl, 1 sball not emplOy any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of Calitornia. Oate ' Signature NOTICE: It, afte� making this tlecla�ation, you shoultl become subject t0 the Workers' Compensation orovisions oi the Labor Cotle, you must Porthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shan be tleemetl revoketl. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCV I M1ereby atfirm that there is a construction lentling agency for the performance of t�e work far which this permit is issuetl (Section 3097 Civ. C.) Lentler'S Name Lentler's Atltlress OWNER BUILDER DECLARATION I h¢reby affi�m that I am exemp[ frOm Ihe Cont�acto�'s License Law for Ihe followin9 reazon (Section ]031.5 Business antl Protessional Cotle: Any ci[y or county which requires a permit to construcq alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the appiicant for sucn oermit to file a signetl statement that he/she is licensetl pursuant ta the provisions of the Cont�actor's License Law (Chapter 9(commencing witb Section ]000) ot �ivision 3 of the Business and Pro(essions Cotle) or that he/sne is exempt theretrom antl the basis tor the alle9etl exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any aOPlitant ror a permit subjects the applicant to a civll �enalty ot not more than five huntlretl tlollars (5500). I, as own�r ot the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensatlon, will tlo the work, antl the structure is not intentletl or offered for Sale (SeGtion 7044, Busine55 and Professional Cotle: The Contractor'S License Law tloes not apply to an owner ot a property who builtls or improves thereon, antl who tloes such work himselt/herself or tM1rou9n his or her own employeei, prOvitletl that such improvements are not intentletl or offere0 (o� sale. I�, ho��ver, tne builtlinq or improvement is soltl within one year of com- pietion, the owner will have the burtlen of proving he/she tlia not builtl or im- prove forthe ourpose ot sale). ❑ I, as owner ot the property, am exclusively contracting with licensetl ron- trattorsto const�uct the project (Section ]044, Busine55 antl Protessions Cotle: The Contia<[or'S License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builtls or improves thereon, antl who contracts for such projects with a con- t�attot(51 Ocense pursuant to the Cont�ac[o�'s License LawJ. 1 am aware [hat proof ol their Wo�ke�'s Compen5ation insurance Shoultl be provitletl to me. ❑ I am exempt untle� Section B. & P. C. tor this reason Type of Sign �^"V' City of Costa Mesa ❑ElecVic �Non-electric SIGN PERMIT � � � � � Description CanoPY Attraction Board Advertising Statuary Other Tract Sign (Security & Right of Entty Agreemenr Special Event (Request form submitted) Change of Copy Ground Wall R oof Projecting Construction Convenience Super Graphic ELECTRICAL FEES Fixtures Device Bozes Outlets Switches Sign Standing Sections I Issue Fae Valuation $ Planning Fee Building Permit Plan Check Electrical Plan Check 50% SMIP TOTALFEE $3 Date owner I hereby certify [hat I have reatl thi5 application antl state that the above Intormation is correct. 1 agree to comply with al1 city antl countY ortlinances DEVELOPMENT SERVICES antl state laws relating to builtling conSVuction, antl hereby authorize repr¢- sentatives of this nI to ent r up e above-men[ioneE proper for P��i� A �o� g insPection PurPscef � / S�� 9 PP Y� — Si9nature ❑atd/� 8uilding Approved By: _ Drivers' License or 55 � � qppNwtion Issued By: _ 0068-30, rev. e/86 White-BuilGinq; Green-Cotle Enforcement; Canary-Applicant; Pink-Revenue; Goltlenrotl-AssesSor Programs ❑ Shopping Center/Integreted dev. ❑ By Owner/or ❑by City Date letter sent: e� L� � � Variance Planned Si9nin9 C.U.P. No I Ilumination Non-I Iluminated Interior Illumination Exterior Illumination INSPECTION APPROVALS Sign Date Underground Conduit Foundations Rough Wiring Framing Final Electric � Fin lanning /O! Final Sign O a Z'i s"'1 Date �� "((G�J — Date � �_�.._�— — Date �1 L'til�� Oftice Use On �! �� `.,�' �/,,p��" �%� � Property A. P. No. � wI "" — Zonin � G/ Sign Oisc. r"E �, _�� Date Received 1 ^ Received by � Street front \ / .�, Front� . Ft. Street: / Y Q�A )�...��1✓+ �I Right: Ft. Street: . Left Pt. Street: . Rear Ft. Streer. Building set 6ack from ultimaie right-of-way�tt. Sign Lotation Front � Rear. Right Left Sign Description Sign Dimensions Area Letter Height /' lj It) �. �"�� _ � w.fc. /� (2) x = sq. ft. (3) z = sq.ft. Itemsof Information: (i) I (2) l3) Total for Activity Copy Ve agq � ��+�-- �7D _ p�� Gin � Ground Sign: Overall Height Planter Area Graund Clearence / Total Sq. Ft. of All Signage Thisactivity L � TotalSite�.(�Z_ No�es: ¢ �XS � �{�A-% �L7V1YL �I Z9y'� O L ,... .,:, ' 'S' -@s'�`�^4-'� �'=�'�',l' �,y�yL-k'm , -a.vr.:a�iN . .- - ' �� r�d; �� .. ^,; �.t L� � � Cit,• r; E:�s�.a t`.h+ssa 8uilai�g Cer��. � BY _____ �?�-._ DA7Fn^ lo. �?� THF>E �".4t. ;,ht;ST BF O;�I �OS ,^,T All TIME� 4�=,;: r� NOCHki.f�"'Tti'il�`Q�UT�ViiRAPPRGVAIOFr��r^'. � })✓r� C7 iNE�I$iU"•nC`".:H GRANi1tiv OF A FEF,M T Oli AFVROVi;. C�F � PLANS �'.^ S;.EC��tC.�.G:. �r<�_ c:;Atl ��!.^.i EE COM1t57RUED `G ;_ . PEP.7Li! �.G� Ga i, cPc�r:::��:,:_ �:` 4^V': V;:i��.nTION O� ANl : HtP<`+: ��(�-.-�-I'�`.y� Tf-cSUMINGTOG' aUTHO?i�:• r. � :1:.. �.. � _ ... �-"""'T.-"ReTr�51Q?I:..OF i�•i;_, COD'c Stl�: S.: :�:^: ��;7�^,7'i-hR�r',5-:H�'. 4K OR U:�t Q`'_ - .._�.. WHICH IT�;:":r.'.:;?:�Ft. j5 u.:y�'Ut,. . � V G./.' /<% i i_r ..' 7:c< ISSU;:::c:2 pF. h��6°-1Jn'.��LANS AND SPfC!.`i::�1�CiP16. 3riHtt�":Di 7@°Vf Nf !NE B11160fNG�L5Ff1Ctth-� FRL`�'h TNEf•Ci'.,�12•� R°Ol�'rUlG ii:E L'Q�Tk„y.t°�'.IdEi1R�'�OP'fRROB I$�N ,! S,itG P:ANS rc:C SF�CG'r:'AiIG:S;�"G!j_,.FROM "PREVFN'71NT� S.UiiDiNG GFEk�,ilONS 6:.'J��ARPfEu"'JN-THEf1EQRDERdvl1EN ;`� �101A71:jN GF 77t15 C^' lCA OF ANY OTHER ORDINANCE bFi i�,i_: Gir.. i �.:� �.: i;—�-��-.-�� e v / �. r r ' �a�� 1 + _i / r \ � ' �,.'—." � li,l ` A_I �� 1 � f� ✓ ' J' # �� i �(, � . i � ,� . i �� ` _ �'�,F-".u.�� 4,.+,'. �f ��i ,� . : �"'ne. `W; . : `x.uL)!�i+;Rr;�:S � t �( \`�` �� + � ,,�`+� / /� 'j j \„ -., �l .� .f ,.,-. � i �� 1 � ��'�f��i 'RDDii7Di��, a �� '- `��:t� �R �hr:CTtO;VS SHAL!` BE �b'PPROWE➢ �i �, � � �ti;r�=�t� o�a,��r��r ��_. i i i � . ' �l R :y � ��PP�.(�1,� D PLANNING DEPT. 6 ECT 70 dLDO, DEPT. RiO. arw��'� oarF 6� OIRK70R OP KANNINO :'i.:..':a:y1` , ; ^'c: :w' 6Y :� � � . . .W��C- __ � r i � � ! i'.� � i..� / �;' dy::�: �� .;��, �u� � � `'�'a V � W 1 �I „o � l L ri . � : � -v -,, , .� • r� `' _ � . , -_ � uZ� �� ,q 2 ' hoV O Q o . �,,� � -��, r �� , r; _.. _.__- ----.., __. __...___...�_..__. � ._. _... � ) �� , '`� nru- o� � _� g i �V �y �9 d AvJfl �a�py ' � �aonn -;�1 ; � S� ShO1Sir�Ot: >,- .r. . !.{ `JNI Wllc; y� i:;,-:-, ;' �o Hoiic �c:,; :� �:,' 3na:sNo� 3s ic,.. vaaev ao i!w;a< , ��1b��Goddy u;�: � '�'H'J-,11Y!V c:i; ' t � 'T,'31'�� __' � vi � � � '� ��. � �� i W ,- �a� �40 'r . ._ �� . .. O � 1 � 4_' .� � ' 4 N: ' , ' , - r: .�. _.,:=: : 4 . , , � � � . : _.. . �' ' � . . y � lrn.. -'- �4 �.... --- ----- - ;%�r�ics� l�,Gy �.r�,X� �,'s� s --- - ��--- • X/. m _ �- ''�--1' } , � ,. ' ��'h7 , � op� ' �,� ;� Y Y W (�` T � l ".f } : s '�r�� '� 1 � J ' ; , ', 't., r �' •. ; . , , ` � r. �l.,t �( f..5'b ' s^ �� W . '�,T,�:�;i�� .. � � .� � � .;L ;�� , �j � ' . �.t � � _ �, 4�Q� `� " . 9 rl ' r, ;� �,,, J ��t�� " , ;, 4•, •�' `,. , �'. . . r��: �i�:P . t � .a. eo_., ._......e n.a�Ril�iti�tk?if�tn++f ea. =- � b Y �a,i�. . in$�� .i(j(}jC,'i: i' ' � : x�. Gt.;i .... . . ... .. .. . . .. . _ . . � _. ._,..�_.._ _.._ ` a _. ... _. . � . . . _ . .. � . . . . . _.1 ._._ .... - _ , N - �_-;;��i<< �: �t ,_ ;rf, - . r11-,,.:�i,; ,. .1 'i� I..Y.. 1 y � � l ` � ... / l pt. � i9 ` , • U AKF pi. r%�� ! � �•J (� i t��'�.. .�"'� ��-1��€� ' / ��r OF l.l ) '�r�E _ . r l �.,� ;H,S , ` � us6 F i �� : . , , i�'//p `.+ '`�� 3477.7 .60STA MESA BUIIDING-SAFETY DEPARTMENT ' P.O. BOX 1200 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA.92626 For Applicant to Fill in Completely . ADDRESS ' /'�S f�i �//� �//A/�� OWNEF MAIL TE CITV ��'� �f/��.�yf� � NO CON5iRUCTION BRANCH A�ORESS ADDRESS CONTRACTOR ��/.�� ADDRESS TEL CITV NO. STATE CITV , �IC. NO. � LIQ NO. SIZE � " ' � � INO.OFB�DGS. OF LOT NOW ON LOT " USE OF EXISTING BIDG. � S2E OF� - rNO. OF, , .Orx 77�aT,t�..,.,.... .._,..,.�� i EXTERIOR'WALL ROOF COVERING � COVERIN USE OF BUILDING AND WORK TO BE P I hereby acknowletlge ffiat 1'have read this apP��<ation and stare that ffie above information is correct antl. agree m comply with all laws regulating building construction, antl I shall not employ any.person in violation' of ffie workman's compensation laws of ffie Staie oF Calitornia... ' � . ';" ' that 1 am prOperly licensed as a contra�ct$�+ wdp( tha�State ot Califorma sine tl Professio �6ivisicn 3, Chapter 9, and ffiat such licenses ar .aqd ffect, or I am' exempt from the pr '' o the Stata�of Callfomia BuSin 5� antl P� ' e, Division 3, Chapte 9. J �/ /� Signature of )y/ ji//�� Permittee /��J°Y /! �• I ,!�/ /eY��- ' � Authorized Apent � ; <.�, , � APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT ��.v ✓ A'�6 � � •/1�� S I ^� JvTjyyy�yyy��Q A.P. NO. � I 10� d) I' I b P�{�C�� BUILDING �� AODRE55 ��s � (� ' � _ TRACT �1��1A �OT �O BLOCK OWNE VALUE ZONE / TVP��/ GftOUP.f�� APPPOV f�, �� _ ._ / - �n� NO.OF USE OF NEW ('�.l(�U`� �� fLANS � BUIL�ING �u�� APPROVEO VARDSAPPROVED 3UIL�ING ACCESSORV BUILOING DISTANCE BET. HET. MAIN & MAIN BLDGS. �� ACc�. eL0 vAR. # ��- ' DATE C.U.P.# APPROVED APPROVED ),� �) � � , j ..�_�11 {�'IK �� . SiA7E .. � yn�• l ��G • /� TAX o / ��4'SQ.FT. � THE AMOUN7SHOWN UNDER..VALUATION IS FOR m rHE °uqp�e OF ESfABLISHING A PERM17 FEE ONLY:� � VALUATION �_ � a �f PERMIT FEE $ r � G� �� U �O PLAN CHECK $ _ �Q � � Z . aU Z ZQ O v~i am J 7 J � Q w p] J m J Q U N Z a W � aw W Z J Q m z J � W w � _ Z � W � N � 70 � '. � / / �STA MESq BUILDING-SAFETY DEPARTMENT P.O. 80X 1200 COSTA MESA_ CAL�FORNIA 92626 „P�,IL' (} J � (� /� II` ili-?: �p:,q.-�1J2�� Uirk itJ�.V� APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Fo�qpplicant to Fillin Completely RECEIVED BV DATE RECEIVED DATE ISSUED BUILDING � S _ �7� ADDPESS G � /'� ^ ///'��/_L PERMIT NO. OWNER L lE,�I A.P.NO. /b MAIL �q�"� � BVILDING . ADDRESS p)cfiV O ADDRESS TEL. TRACT LOT BLOCK ��T� sTi� �s�{ No. -o a CONSTRUCTION W AD A R P LENDER BRANCH � L I �(r`E OWNER ADDRESS �Q VALUE ApCHITECT TEL S /NJ O�-ia $ ' OR ENGINEER N FIRE ADORESS ZONE TVPE GROUP APPROVED CONTFACTOfl 8V DATE ADDFE55 TEL. ZONE NO.OF USE OF NEW , CITV NO. P�+� BUILOING STATE CITV VARDSAPPROVED VARDSAPPROVED IIC. NO. L10. NO. MAW qUILOING ACCESSORV BUILDING S12E NO.OF BLOGS. (FROM GL STREET) OF lOT ' NOW ON LOT FRONT FT. FT. � USE OF EXISTING BLDG. R SI E FT. FT. SIZE OF NO. OF NEWBLOG. ROOMS STORIES "L.SIDE FT. FT. % EXTERIOR WALL ROOF � COVERING COVERING REAR FT. FT. USE OF BUILDING AND WORK TO BE PERFOFMED DISTANCE BET. BET. MAIN & MAIN BLDGS. ACCESS. BLDGS. (� ' VAR. # DATE vDV TAI L �-D� C.U.P.�y-` 11PPROVED � APPROVED 1 hereby acknowledge-that I have reatl this application antl state ffiat [he above information is� correct and aB�ee to comply wiffi all laws regulatin9 building construction, antl I shall not employ any parson in violation of the workman's compensation laws of m the State ot California. ' � I hereby certify that I am properly licensetl as a contrsctor under ��SQ. FT. O the State of Califp�nia Business antl Professions Cotle, Divisicn 3, TME AMOUNTSHOWN UNDER VALUATION IS FOR � a Chapter 9, and that such licenses are in full force antl etteci, or I THE PVRPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A PERMIT FE ONLV: Q am exempt from ihe provisions of ffie State ot Califomia Business VALUATION - o-fl antl Professions Cptle, Division 3, Chapter 9. PERMIT FEE 5 �� • � J Signature ot °� Permittee � $��[yv�0 PLAN CHECK $ E / . 0—p `o Authorizetl Agent , LL TOTAL FEE $