Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-88 - Fountain Valley's Request for Design and Analysis of Gisler-Garfield BridgeRESOLUTION NO. 02-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA OPPOSING THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY'S REQUEST TO THE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR DESIGN 'AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE GISLER- GARLFIELD BRIDGE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93-83, on October 25, 1993, requesting the County of Orange to initiate the process to remove the Gisler - Garfield Bridge from the Master Plan of Highways and supporting the "no bridge" scenario; and WHEREAS, the Costa Mesa City Council does hereby emphatically reaffirm this City's position as stated in Resolution No. 93-89 along with the additional key elements stated herein; and WHEREAS, the Santa Ana River Crossing (SARX) Study will be completed and reviewed by the elected officials and the public in the cities of Fountain Valley, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa, in the next few months ; and WHEREAS, it would be a waste of scarce public funds for the City of Fountain Valley to apply for grant funds at this time, nor should the ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA) fund additional design and environmental work for this bridge project until the SARX Study is final; and WHEREAS, The SARX Study has identified a series of alternative mitigation measures instead of construction of the bridge that are more cost effective and less intrusive to the surrounding communities; and WHEREAS, several years of.work and over $200,000.00 in consultant costs have been expended in studying the Gisler -Garfield Bridge Proposal; and WHEREAS, the magnitude of the impact of the Gisler -Garfield Bridge on both Costa Mesa and Fountain Valley is enormous, the matter of Fountain Valley's application for OCTA funding for this bridge project should be considered at a Public Hearing with input from all affected residents and not be scheduled as a Consent Calendar matter ; and WHEREAS, the two cities have a long history of cooperation and collaboration in resolving problems of joint concern; and WHEREAS, the City of Fountain Valley's action to apply for OCTA funding at this time is wholly inconsistent with that historic level of cooperation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Costa Mesa City Council does hereby proclaim that it will be forced to take action to oppose the project at each and every step of the approval process, if the City of Fountain Valley approves an application to OCTA seeking funds for the Gisler -Garfield Bridge project. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 2002. AT71T:i��10 Deput ity Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney, STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF COSTA MESA ) ayor of the City of Costa Mesa I, JULIE FOLCIK, Deputy City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 02-88 was duly and regularly passed and. adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of December, 2002, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Steel, Cowan, Monahan, Mansoor NOES: None ABSENT: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 17th day of December, 2002. DeputKyVACouncil ity Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Ci of the City of Costa Mesa