HomeMy WebLinkAbout- - Agenda - 11/18/2014AGENDA
CITY OF COSTA MESA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL, AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY* MEETING
*NOTE: ALL AGENCY AND AUTHORITY MEMBERSHIPS ARE REFLECTED IN THE TITLE "COUNCIL MEMBER."
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2014
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 77 FAIR DRIVE
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING - 6:00 P.M.
JAMES M. RIGHEIMER
Mayor
STEPHEN MENSINGER
Mayor Pro Tem
GARY MONAHAN
Council Member
City Attorney
Thomas Duarte
SANDRA GENTS
Council Member
WENDY LEECE
Council Member
Chief Executive Officer
Thomas R. Hatch
Note regarding agenda -related writings or documents provided to a majority of
the City Council after distribution of the City Council agenda packet (GC
§54957.5):
Any related writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council after
distribution of the City Council Agenda Packets will be made available for public
inspection. Binders containing these agenda -related documents are located in the
Council Chambers lobby. In addition, such writings and documents may be posted—
whenever possible or as part of the agenda—on the city's website at
www.costamesaca.gov.
Your attendance at this public meeting is valued and appreciated. If you have questions
regarding the agenda, public comments or wish to obtain copies of documents please
contact the City Clerk office at (714)754-5225 or e-mail
Brenda.Green@costamesaca.gov.
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 1
v.1, 11/12/2014
WELCOME TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PUBLIC COMMENTS — MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA: If you wish to
address the City Council on a matter not on the agenda, please complete and submit a
yellow speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards must be submitted to the City
Clerk either prior to the first Public Comment period or prior to the Continued Public
Comment period. Up to ten speakers will be given time to address the City Council
during the first Public Comment period following Presentations. The Continued Public
Comment period will be held at the end of the agenda after Items Removed from
Consent Calendar. Members of the public shall only address the City Council one time
at any given meeting under either Public Comment period. Speakers may only
complete one card per person. Each speaker is limited to three minutes.
PUBLIC COMMENTS — MATTER LISTED ON THE AGENDA: If you wish to address
the City Council on a matter listed on the agenda, please complete and submit a green
speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards must be submitted prior to the start of
Public Comments on the item. Please identify which item on the agenda you would like
to address. Each speaker is limited to three minutes.
The speaker cards are located on the table at the entrance to the City Council
Chamber.
Please take notice that the order of scheduled agenda items may be modified by the
Mayor or the City Council during the course of the meeting, so please stay alert.
1. Any written communications, photos, or other material for distribution to the City
Council must be submitted to the City Clerk NO LATER THAN 15 MINUTES PRIOR
TO THE START OF THE MEETING. Any materials to be displayed on the overhead
projector at the Council meeting must be submitted to the City Clerk NO LATER
THAN 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING.
2. In accordance with Costa Mesa Municipal Code, Sec. 2-64 (1): No person in the
audience shall engage in disorderly, disruptive, disturbing, delaying or boisterous
conduct.
3. All cell phones and other electronic devices are to be turned off or set to
vibrate. Members of the audience are requested to step outside the Council
Chambers to conduct a phone conversation.
4. In accordance with City Council Policy 000-11, and among other requirements, any
video submitted for display at a public meeting must have been previously reviewed
by staff to verify appropriateness for general audiences. A copy of this policy is
available at City Hall during normal office hours.
5. Free Wi-Fi is available in the Council Chamber during the meetings. Two networks
are available: council1 and council2. The password for either network is: cmcouncil.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (714) 754-5225. Notification
of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 2
v.1, 11/12/2014
CLOSED SESSION — 5:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the public are welcome to address the City Council only on those items on
the Closed Session agenda. Each member of the public will be given three minutes to
speak.
1. Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation: Two Cases, Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
The City Council and Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will
recess to Conference Room 5A for Closed Session at the conclusion of public
comments.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY — 6 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Righeimer
MOMENT OF SOLEMN EXPRESSION
[Per Council Policy 000-12, these presentations are made by community volunteers
stating their own views. The City Council disclaims any intent to endorse or sponsor the
views of any speaker.]
Ryan Zuniger, Grace Fellowship Church
ROLL CALL
CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT
• COIN: Ex Parte Communications pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2-238 (b)
ANNOUNCEMENTS: There's always something happening in Costa Mesa!
The Mayor will play a video clip of the "Costa Mesa Minute," featuring upcoming events
and activities in the community.
PRESENTATIONS: Purple Heart City Proclamation Presentation to Dannie Watkins, Commander
of Chapter 752 Military Order.
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 3
v.1, 11/12/2014
PUBLIC COMMENTS — MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA:
If you wish to address the City Council on a matter not on the agenda, please complete
and submit a yellow speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards must be submitted to
the City Clerk either prior to the first Public Comment period or prior to the Continued
Public Comment period. Up to ten speakers will be given time to address the City
Council during the first Public Comment period following Presentations. The Continued
Public Comment period will be held at the end of the agenda after Items Removed from
Consent Calendar. Members of the public shall only address the City Council one time
at any given meeting under either Public Comment period. Speakers may only
complete one card per person. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. The three
minute per speaker time limit may be extended for good cause by the Mayor or by a
majority vote of City Council. Questions and comments made by public speakers may
be addressed by the City Council during Council Comments or by the Chief Executive
Officer during the CEO's Report.
COUNCIL MEMBERS' REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS
1. Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
2. Council Member Genis
3. Council Member Leece
4. Council Member Monahan
5. Mayor Righeimer
REPORT — CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO)
CONSENT CALENDAR:
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be
acted upon in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council, staff, or the public request specific items to be discussed
and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
1. PROCEDURAL WAIVER: MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE
ONLY OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES
AND RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE
READ BY TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER READING WAIVED
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Adopt and Approve Ordinances and Resolutions by Reading Title
Only, and Further Reading Waived.
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 4
v.1, 11/12/2014
2. READING FOLDER
a. Claims Received by the City Clerk: Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Interinsurance
Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California, as Subrogee for Jill
Pereira, James & Laura Bryan, and GEICO, as Subrogee for Jamie Leeds.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Receive and File.
3. WARRANT RESOLUTION NO. 2525 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, INCLUDING PAYROLL REGISTER NOS. 14-21 "A" FOR
$157,350.30 AND 14-22 for $2,143,406.15; AND CITY OPERATING
EXPENSES FOR $2,965,916.94; AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF
WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE PAID. — Finance Department
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Warrant Resolution No. 2525, to be Read by the Title Only, and Waive
Further Reading.
4. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF MEDIANS
AND ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN — Public Services Department/Engineering
Division
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Authorize Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with
Asakura Robinson Company, 445 Santa Ana Av., Newport Beach, California
92663, in an Amount Not -to -Exceed $68,350 for Design Services.
5. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY
MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 3, 2013, JANUARY 21, 2014, APRIL 1, 2014, AND
MAY 6, 2014; AND THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND
SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING WITH THE
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF JANUARY 7, 2014 — Chief Executive Officer's
Department/City Clerk's Office
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Approve the Minutes.
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 5
v.1, 11/12/2014
6. FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 17705 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2294
PACIFIC AV. – Public Services Department/Transportation Services Division
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Adopt Resolution No. 14-xx, to be Read by Title Only and Waive
Further Reading; Approve the Final Map of Tract No. 17705; and Authorize
Vacation of a Twenty -Five Foot Portion of a Thirty -Foot Wide Public Utility
Easement.
7. PROPOSED 177 -UNIT LIVE/WORK AND LOFT DEVELOPMENT AT 671 W.
17T—" STREET – Development Services/Planning Division
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Approve a Professional Services Agreement with PlaceWorks in the
Amount of $86,165, to Provide Environmental Consulting Services for an Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Authorize CEO to Sign Extensions or
Renewals of the Contract.
8. ADOPTION OF THE FY 2014-2015 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY -
Finance Department
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council and Successor Agency Adopt Resolutions, to be Read by Title Only
and Waive Further Reading, Approving the Statement of Investment Policies for
Fiscal Year 2014-2015 and Delegating Investment Activities to the City
Treasurer.
9. LANDSCAPE AND TURF MAINTENANCE OF PARKWAYS, MEDIANS, AND
FIRE STATIONS – Public Services, Engineering/Design
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Authorize Execution of an Amendment to the Performance Services
Agreement with Midori Gardens, Inc., Extending the Term to February 28, 2015,
in the Amount of $37,051.67 Per Month.
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 6
v.1, 11/12/2014
10. LANDSCAPE AND TURF MAINTENANCE OF PARKS, FACILITIES, AND
SPORTS FIELDS — Public Services, Engineering/Design
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Authorize Execution of an Amendment to the Performance Services
Agreement with SpectrumCare Landscape, Extending the Term to February 28,
2015, in the Amount of $29,560.53 Per Month.
11. MODIFICATION TO THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA (BIA) TO ADD
BLVD HOTEL FOR THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS —Office of the
Chief Executive Officer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Approve Resolution No. 14 -XX, to be Read by Title Only and Further
Reading Waived, Declaring the City's Intention to Modify the BIA to Include
Certain Hotels and Motels in the Area, and Setting a Public Hearing for January
20, 2014.
----------------------------------- END OF CONSENT CALENDAR -----------------------------------
PUBLIC HEARINGS — 7:00 p.m. (Resolution No. 05-55):
1. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM
Public Services/Transportation Division
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Adopt Resolution No. 14-xx, to be Read by Title Only and Further
Reading Waived; Approve Continuation of the Current Traffic Impact Fee of $181
per Average Daily Trip (ADT) for New Development in the City of Costa Mesa;
Continue the Incentive Program for New Developments by Assessing Traffic
Impact Fees on an Incremental Basis for the First 100 Trips; and Approve the
Annual Accounting of the Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Program.
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 7
v.1, 11/12/2014
2. PROPOSED 393 -UNIT MID -RISE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT,
"SYMPHONY APARTMENTS" TO BE LOCATED AT 585 AND 595 ANTON
BLVD.— Development Services/Planning Division
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Adopt Resolution No. 14-xx, to be Read by Title Only and Further
Reading Waived, Approving the Addendum to the Final Program
Environmental Impact Report No. 1052 and Final Master Plan PA -14-11; and
2. Adopt Resolution No. 14-xx, to be Read by Title Only and Further Reading
Waived, Approving Park Mitigation Agreement between the Wilson Meany, LP
and the City of Costa Mesa to Fund Future Parkland Related Improvements or
Acquisitions.
OLD BUSINESS
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER IV OF TITLE 12 OF THE
COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING A SENIOR COMMISSION
THAT WILL SERVE AS AN ADVISORY COMMISSION TO THE CITY
COUNCIL ON MATTERS RELATED TO THE OPERATION OF THE COSTA
MESA SENIOR CENTER— Parks and Community Services Department
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Give Second Reading, to be Read by Title Only and Further
Reading Waived, and Adopt Ordinance No. 14-14.
NEW BUSINESS
HOST TOWN PARTICIPATION FOR THE 2015 SPECIAL OLYMPICS WORLD
GAMES — Office of the Chief Executive Officer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council Provide Direction to Staff Regarding Participation.
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 8
v.1, 11/12/2014
2. TWO MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE PETITIONS QUALIFYING FOR
BALLOT; CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING NEW ORDINANCE, ORDERING
ELECTION OR ORDERING REPORT; CONSIDERATION OF CITY MEDICAL
MARIJUANA MEASURE(S) — City Attorney's Office; City Clerk's Office
RECOMMENDATION:
A. It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Accept the Certificate of Sufficiency issued by the County of Orange
Registrar of Voters regarding: An Initiative to Allow Operation of Up to
Eight Medical Marijuana (Cannabis) Businesses in the City of Costa Mesa;
and
2. Accept the Certificate of Sufficiency issued by the County of Orange
Registrar of Voters regarding: An Initiative to Allow Operation of up to Four
Licensed Medical Marijuana Businesses in City of Costa Mesa.
B. Further, it is recommended that the City Council approve (for each initiative)
one of the following options:
1. Adopt the ordinance (for either initiative), without alteration, at the regular
meeting at which the certification of the petition is presented, or within 10
days after it is presented (authorized by the Election Code, yet not
recommended); or
2. Order a special election (for either initiative), to be held pursuant to
subdivision (a) of Election Code § 1405 [which states that the election for
a municipal initiative that qualifies shall be held not less than 88 nor more
than 103 days after the date of the order of election], at which the
ordinance, without alteration, shall be submitted to a vote of the voters of
the city; or
3. Order a regular election (for either initiative), to be consolidated with the
next "regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing
body of the local government," pursuant to Article XIII C § 2(b) of the
California Constitution, which would be November 8, 2016; or
4. Order a report pursuant to Election Code § 9212 (for either initiative) at the
regular meeting at which the certification of the petition is presented.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS ON CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 9
v.1, 11/12/2014
REPORT — CITY ATTORNEY
ADJOURNMENT — To Regular Meeting — December 2, 2014 at 5:00 p.m.
UPCOMING COMMUNITY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES
• Canvas Costa Mesa: An Art Event, November 21St from 7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m., at
The LAB: 2930 Bristol St., Costa Mesa
• City Hall Closed for Thanksgiving November 27 and 28, 2014.
AGENDA —REGULAR MEETING — November 18, 2014 — PAGE 10
v.1, 11/12/2014
WARRANT RESOLUTION NO. 2525
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS, INCLUDING PAYROLL REGISTER NOS.
14-21 "A" FOR $157,350.30 AND 14-22 FOR $2,143,406.15; AND CITY OPERATING
EXPENSES FOR $2,965,916.94, AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE
SAME ARE TO BE PAID
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the attached claims and demands have been audited as required by
law and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts, and the payments made are hereby
ratified.
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this warrant resolution
and shall deliver a copy thereof to the City Treasurer/City Director of Finance, and shall retain a
certified copy thereof in the City records in the Office of the City Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 185` day of November, 2014.
ATTEST:
cb- ay-p�
BRENDA GREEN,
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
the above and foregoing is the original of Warrant Resolution No. 2525 and was duly passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18"
day of November, 2014, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: GENTS, LEECE, MONAHAN, MENSINGER, RIGHEIMER
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa
Mesa this 18"' day of November, 2014.
LOA �
BRENDA GREEN4 CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 2525
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: 3
SU13JECT: ADOPTION OF WARRANT RESOLUTION
DATE: October 31, 2014
FROM: Department of Finance
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Dunivent at 714-754-5243
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt Warrant Resolution No. 2525 to be read by title only and further
reading waived.
BACKGROUND:
In accordance with Section 37202 of the California Government Code, the Director of
Finance or their designated representative hereby certify to the accuracy of the
following demands and to the availability of funds for payment thereof.
FISCAL REVIEW:
Funding Payroll No.14-21 "A" for $157,350.30; Payroll No. 14-22 for $2,143,406.15;
and City operating expenses for $2,319,806.30.
STEPHEN DUNIV NT
Interim Finance Director
Report ID: CCM2001V City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
CCM VOID CHECK LISTING Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:39:48 PM
-Cycle:
Payment Ref Cancel Date Status Remit To Remit ID Payment Date Payment Amt
0183528 10/29/2014 V Matthew Kaihewalu 0000022938 10/03/14 (250.00)
Line Description: Check never received due to incorrect mailing address. Stop payment placed on 10/29/14 and check re -issued on
0183725 10/30/2014 V Mesa Consolidated Water District 0000003144 10/17/14 (37,825.43)
Line Description: 10/30/14 Vendor did not received payment_ Put stop payment and re -issued.
0183774 10/28/2014 V Data Ticket Inc 0000010929 10/17/14 (580.00)
Line Description: 10/27/14 Fee for two citation belong to City. (#P667611, P667616). Void refund check.
End of Report
TOTAL ($38,655.43)
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No_ 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: COMM Run Time 2:05:38 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
000825
10/31/14
P Apple One Employment Services
0000001055
3,425.92
Line Description: Temp Svcs Rec 9122-9/26114
Temp Svcs Rec 9/29-1013114
Temp Svcs Cntrl Svs 9129-1013
Temp Svcs Cntl Svs 9122-9/26
000826
10/31114
P Ariel Supply Inc
0000006035
4,531-64
Line Description: Toner Cartridges
Toner Cartridges
Toner Carfridges
Toner Cartridges
Toner Cartridges
Toner Cartridges
Toner Cartridges
000827
90/31/14
P CBE
0000015149
2,240.78
Line Description: Copier Maint 10/5-1114/14
Overage Fee 9P5-10/4114
Copier Overage Fee 912 0-1 011 9
Copier Overage Fee 915-1014114
Copier Overage Fee 915-1014
Copier Overage Fee 9/5-1014114
Overage Fee 915-1014114
Freight Charge 4 Free Toner
000828
10/31/14
P ComSerCo Inc
0000008246
4,399.50
Line Description: One -Wire Surveiflance Kit
Sales Tax
Shipping Fee
BDA Repairs
000829
10131/14
P FM Thomas Air Conditioning Inc
0000017151
5,071.50
Line Description: HVAC Maint-Oct 14
TOTAL $19,669.34
End of Report
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 29,2014
Bank: DDP1 Run Time 2:24:31 PM
cycle-, ADIRDP
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit [D
Payment Amt
003146
10/31/14
P Alan F Kent
0000006393
2.17479
Line Description: 1 % Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003147
10/31/14
P Beckee Cost
0000016309
946.08
Line Description: 1% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003148
10/31/14
P Chris Morris
0000007439
2,500.00
Line Descnption: Monthly LTD Payment Nov 2014
003149
10/31/14
P Danny Hogue
0000006802
1,137.03
Line Description: 1 % Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003150
10/31/14
P Darlene Bell
0000005602
580.54
Line Description: 1 % Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003151
10131/14
P David A Dye
0000002065
260.90
Line Description: 1% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003152
10131114
P Edmond Zuorski
0000005299
1,009.04
Line Description: 1 % Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003153
10/31/14
P Edward Dryzmala
0000006686
1,377.28
Line Description: 1 % Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003154
10/31/14
P Gary D Webster
0000004487
1,204.44
Line Description: 1% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003155
10/31/14
P George J Yezbick Jr
0000005045
1,184.00
Line Description: 1% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 2
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 29,2014
Bank: DDP1 Run Time 2:24:31 PM
Cycle: Anlppp
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
003156
10/31/14
P Harlan Pauley
0000003569
Line Description: 1% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003157
10131114
P James M Miller
0000007440
Line Description: Monthly LTD Payment Nov 2014
003158
10/31/14
P Matthew J Collett
0000001720
Line Description: I% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003159
10/31/14
P Paul A Cappuccilli
0000007705
Line Description: 1% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003160
10/31/14
P Phil Dickens
0000005801
Line Description: 1% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003161
10/31114
P Richard J Johnson
0000005620
Line Description: 1% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003162
10/31/14
P Ted Curry
0000001896
Line Description- Monthly LTD Payment Nov 2014
003163
10/31/14
P Thomas Boylan
0000001366
Line Description: 1 % Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
003164
10/31/14
P Thomas J Lazar
0000002925
Line Description: I% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
Payment Amt
232.12
2,500.00
856.58
1,214.50
511.76
1,255.66
1,03T98
115.97
1.703.25
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 3
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run date Oct 29,2014
Bank: DDP1 Run Time 2:24:31 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref Date
003165 10/31/14
Status Remit To
P William H Bechtel
Line Description: 1 % Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
End of Report
0000001224
Payment Amt
1,622.58
TOTAL $23,404.50
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0184027 10/31/14
P Advantec Consulting Engineers Inc
Line Description: Fariview TSSP Proj-Aug 14
Fariview TSSP Proj-Dec 13
Fariview TSSP Proj-Jan 14
Fariview TSSP Proj-Mar 14
Fariview TSSP Proj-July 14
Fariview TSSP Proj-Apr 14
Fariview TSSP Proj-May 14
0184028 10/31/14
P Albert Grover & Associates Inc
Line Description_ Baker/Placentia TSSP-Sept 14
0184029 10/31/14
P Civil Source
Line Description: Cnstrn Mgntlinpectn-Sept 14
CIP Proj Staff Support-Sept14
Park Staff Support -Sep 14
0184030 10/31/14
P Fatpot Technologies LLC
Line Description: New Interface lmpmtn
0184031 10/31/14
P G4S Secure Solutions Inc
Line Description. Jail Facilities Svs.Sep 14
0184032 10/31/14
P industrial Networking Solutions
Line Description: Antenna Plus
Broadband Router LTE
Sales Tax (8.00%)
0184033 10/31/14
P Jones & Mayer
Line Description: 68690 -CEO
68691 -Civic Center Barrio
69682-246 Cabrillo
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000021528 17,826.14
0000014065 45,791.77
0000017030 43,960.00
0000003034 24,995.00
0000022480 63,983.39
0000022583 23,406.58
0000014653 142,085.11
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No.
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32.15 PN
Cycle: AmwLy
Payment Ref Date Status
Remit To
Line Description: 69683 -Richardson
69688- Ctiy Attorney
69692 -Code Enforcement
69694 -City Council
69696 -Finance
69698 -Fire Dept
69707 -Lawrence
69706 -Johnstone
69705 -James
69704 -IT
69703-I nterins u ran ce
69702 -Housing
69701-Hartbrodt
69700 -Griffin
69699 -Goggin
69724 -Robertsons CT&F
69723 -Risk Management
69722 -Ricks
69721 -Recreation
69720 -Quality of Life Group
69719 -Public Svs
69718 -Prada
69717 -Police Dept
69716 -Planning Comm
69715-Pfaut7
69714-Petrowske
69713 -PD Med marijuana
69712 -Parks & Community
69711 -Olson
69710 -Olsen
69709 -Mood
69708 -Litigation
69726 -Telecomm
69725 -Taft
69697 -Finch
69695 -Development Svs
69693 -Connolly
69689 -City Clerk
69687-Baltusis
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 3
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle: AiAiKi
Payment Ref Date Status Remit To
Line Description: 69686 -Bailey
69685 -Animal Control
0184034 10/31/14 P Janes Day
Line Description: CMCEA-J7/31/14
CMCEA-6130114
0184035 10/31/14 P Mesa Consolidated Water District
Line Description: Sr Cntr Fireline 811 2-1 011 511 4
1035 W 19th 8115-10/16114
3400 Smalley 911 5-1 011 511 4
970 Arlington 9115-10/15/14
570 W18th 911 5-1 011 511 4
BCC 9115-10/15114
1200 Victoria 9/15-10115114
600 112 Town Cntr 9/11-10120
523 Hamilton 8/19-10121/14
751 Victoria 8119-10122/14
861 112 Victoria 8120-10122114
970 Arbor 8120-10123114
970 Arbor 8121-10123114
2109 Canyon 8/21-10123114
2115 Canyon 8121-10123114
1085 Sea Bluff 8121-10123114
985 112 Victoria 8/20-10/22114
1015 112 W 19th 8115-10/16/14
524 1/2 W 19th 8119-10121114
562 112 W 19th 8119-10/21114
628 112 W 19th 8119-10/21114
720 112 W 19th 8119-10122114
782 Shalimar 811 3-1 011 611 4
420 112 W 19th 8118-10120/14
1900 Adams 9115-10115/14
Sr Cntr Fireline10115-10124!14
FS ##4 9115-10/15/14
3143 Bear 9/15-10/15114
2141 Tustin 8/7-1019114
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000021335 31,952.90
0000003144 74,402.35
deport ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No.
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CIN Run Time 3:32:15 PN
Cycle:_ AWKI Y ----
Payment Ref Date Status Remit To
Line Description: 1800 Newport 814-10/6114
402 112 Broadway 815-1016114
195 112 Broadway 814-1016114
134 112 E 19th 815-1017/14
360 Ogle 814-1011114
111 Fair 812 7-912 911 4
140 112 E 17th 815-1012114
140 112 F 17th 8/5-1012114
1648 112 Newport 811-10/1114
1648 112 Newport 811-10/1114
257 E 16th 7131-1011114
257 E 16th 7131-10/1114
257 E 16h 7131-1011114
257 E 16h 7131-1011114
3581 Harbor 8127-9129/14
3581 Harbor 812 7-912 911 4
1400 Sunflower 812 7-912 911 4
1400 Sunflower 8127--9129114
2800 Bear 8/27-9/29114
2800 Bear 8127-9129/14
3333 Bear 8/27-9129114
3333 Bear 8127-9/29/14
3333 Bear 812 7-912 911 4
2400 Fariview 8127-9129114
2750 Fairview 812 7-912 911 4
2750 Fairview 8127-9129114
2621 112 Harbor 8127-9/29114
2621 112 Harbor 812 7-912 911 4
234 112 E 17th 814-10/2114
234 112 E 17th 814-10/2114
3202 Harbor 8127-9129/14
3202 Harbor 8/27-9129/14
3333 Bear 8127-9/29114
970 Arlington 8127-9129/14
970 Arlington 8127-9129114
970 Arlington 8127-9129/14
970 Arlington 8127-9/29114
2501 Placentia 8127-9/29114
2501 Placentia 8/27-9129114
Payment Amt
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No_ 5
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CIT Run Time 3:32:15 PM
cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description. 111 Fair 8127-9129/14
1550 E Mesa Verde 7/17-9117114
1550 E Mesa Verde 7/17-9117114
2229 Newport 8127-9129114
2229 Newport 8127-9129/14
2600 Fariview 8/27-9129114
2600 Fariview 8127-9/29114
2400 Fariview 8127-9129114
360 Ogle 814-10/1114
134 112 E 19th 815-10/7114
195 112 Broadway 814-1016114
402 112 Broadway 815-1016114
1800 Newport 814-1016114
2141 Tustin 817-1019114
0184038
10/31/14
P Onward Engineering
0000003212
26,232.68
Line Description: Construction Mgmt & Inspection
Construction Mgmt & inspection
0184039
10/31/14
P Orange County Treasurer Tax Collector
0000003489
18,893.46
Line Description: ParkingCitatnProcessing 912014
Radio Repairs CMI Sept 2014
Radio Repairs CM2 Sept 2014
Radio Repairs CM4 Sept 2014
0184040
10/31/14
P Orange County Treasurer Tax Collector
0000003489
32,521.00
Line Description: €nitiativeSignatureVerificatn
0184041
10/31/14
P Robert Taft Sr
0000023001
35,810.00
Line Description: Settlement 4 Traffic Accident
0184042
10/31/14
P 1st Jon Inc
0000018321
941.00
Line Description: Porta Potty Svc 4 FDC Trailer
Porta Potty Svc -Scarecrow
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 6
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
C cle: AIAWI
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit 1D
Payment Amt
0184043
10/31114
P AT & T
0000001107
145.22
Line Description: NCC DSL Line 10120-11119114
0184044
10/31/14
P AT & T
0000001107
4,522.53
Line Description: Red Phone FireSta#6 9120-1 011 9
800 Mhz Radiol-ink 9120-10119
Red Phone FireSta#2 9/20-10/19
Red Phone FireSta#1 9120-10119
Red Phone FireSta#4 9120-10/19
Red Phone FireSta#3 9120-10119
PRI Circuit Inbound Trunk 9120
RMATS SCPLSubstation9117-10116
Senior Center 911 5-1 011 411 4
Senior Center 91#5-10114/14
Senior Center 9/15-10114114
RMATS Fire Sta#4 9120-10119114
DRC Fire Alarm 9120-10119/14
Balearic Center Fax 9115-10/14
JackHammettSprtsCmplx9/20-1011
RMATS Civic Center 9120-10119
Fire Emergency Line 9120-10119
Local Usage 9/15-10114114
NCC Alarm 9/19-10118114
Lions Park 9/19-10118114
Metro Net 9120-10/19114
Red Phone FireSta#5 9120-1 011 9
0184046
10/31/14
P AT & T Mobility
0000001107
798.07
Line Description: Rec Cell Phone Usage9112-10/11
IT CeII Phone Usage 9112-10/11
0184047
10/31/14
P AT & T Teleconference Services
0000001107
42.43
Line Description: TeleConference Srvcs-Sept 2014
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 7
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY
Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
0184048
10131/14
P Advanced Chemical Transport Inc
Line Description: Haz Mat Disposal
0184049
10/31/14
P Agromin OC LLC
Line Description: Mulch 4 City Sites
0184050
10/31/14
P Ailstar Fire Equipment Inc
Line Description: Safety Boots -Reddy, Ruh)
0184051
10/31/14
P Alonzo H Parker Ill
Line Description: Basketball Referee 10/20/14
Basketball Referee 9122114
Basketball Referee 8/19/14
0184052
10131/14
P American Alarm Systems Inc
Line Description: Fire/Securty Mntrng 1111-1131
0184053
10/31/14
P American Wellness Supply
Line Description: Mattress Covers
SAles & Use Tax Payable
Sales Tax (8.00°/x)
0184054
10/31/14
P Amtech Elevator Services
Line Description: Elevator Maint 1011 -12131114
0184055
10131/14
P Ana Becerra
Line Description: Rfnd Sbpn Dep #001-00263611
Remit ID
0000002951
0000021587
0000000986
0000016232
0000008900
0000022213
0000013616
I�I�i�I�I�Y�d1I071
Payment Amt
9,159.75
664.20
655.03
184.00
510.00
1,709.43
2,513.70
161.41
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 8
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CIN Run Time 3:32:95 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0184056
10/31/14
P Anaheim Regional Medical Center
0000021276
750.00
Line Description. Victim Physical -Case #14-9606
0184057
10/31/14
P Anthony Monteleone
0000021339
156.00
Line Description Softball Umpire 10/16/14
Softball Umpire 10122/14
0184058
10/31/14
P Aramark Correctional Services Inc
0000013108
644-84
Line Description: Jail Food 8122-9126114
0184059
10/31/14
P Bank of AmericaAccountAnalysis
0000001173
1,607.70
Line Description: Account Analysis
0184060
10/31/14
P Bestway Laundry Solutions
0000001257
238.00
Line Description: Washer Repair 4 Jail
Washer Repair Jail
0184061
10/31/14
P Blaze Cone Company Inc
0000012505
1,226.20
Line Description: Sales Tax (8.00%)
Shipping Fee
Traffic Cones
0184062
10/31/14
P Bryan Wilkins
0000007822
100.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001496.002
0184063
10/31/14
P C3 Office Solutions LLC
0000022890
9,436.84
Line Description. Electronic Waste Fee
Interactive Monitor
Sales Tax (8.00°/x)
Installation
Setup and Training
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 9
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle: AINKLY
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Line Description: Smart Pen
ePresent
Shipping Fee
0184064
10/31/14
P Candela Corporation
Line Description: Re -lamp Lights @ Sr Cntr
Lights
0184065
10/31/14
P Candelaria Aguilar
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001494.002
0184066
10/31/14
P Chandler Asset Management
Line Description: Investment Mgnt Svs Sept 14
0184067
10/31/14
P Chandlers Air Conditioning &
Line Description: Freezer Repair@Property
0184068
10131/14
P Chem Mark Inc
Line Description: Laundry Chemicals 4 Jail
0184069
10/31/14
P Choice Electrical Construction
Line Description: Heller Pk Lights Repair
0184070
10/31/14
P Christina Braun
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt42000342.002
0184071
10/31/14
P Coast Recreation Int
Line Description: Playground Parts
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000001564 1,204.03
0000023011 100.00
0000022081 3,331.00
0000001640 232.51
0000006262 203.37
0000019149 518.14
0000016929 100.00
0000001702 777.80
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 10
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CIN Run Time 3:32:15 PM
C cle:
Payment Fief
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0184072
10/31/14
P Community SenicrSery
0000018544
10,000.00
Line Description: CDBG 1st Qtr 2014-15 Grant
CDBG 1st Qtr 2014-15 Grant
0184073
10/31/14
P CompuCom Systems
0000004859
799.89
Line Description: 3 Copies of Adobe System
0184074
10/31/14
P Cooper Floors Inc
0000022860
3,700.00
Line Description: SENIOR CENTER - Parguet Floor
0184075
10/31/14
P Costa Mesa Auto Glass
0000010001
1,637.96
Line Description: Window Tint -#514
Window Tint -#520
Window Tint -#523
Window Tint -#525
Window Tint -#515
Window Tint -#517
Window Tint -#524
Window Tint -#509
0184076
10/31/14
P Costa Mesa Lock & Key
0000001817
230.00
Line Description: Lock Repair @ PD
Sr Cntr Lock Repair
0184077
10/31/14
P Craig Hanks
0000011/02
46.00
Line Descripfion: Basketball Referee 10/20/14
0184078
10/31/14
P Creative Outlet Studio Inc
0000022080
100.00
Line Description: Scarecrow Wkshp 916114
0184079
10/31114
P Crime Scene Steri -Clean LLC
0000020122
750.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 11
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
500.00
0000002130
Line Description: Biohazard Clean Up&Disposal
0184080
10/31/14
P Curtis Moore
Line Description: Refund Live Scan Fee
0184081
10/31/14
P David Taussig & Associates Inc
Line Description: Park Inpact Fees Study -Oct 14
0184082
10/31/14
P Dennis Harris
Line Description: Basketball Referee 9116114
Basketball Referee 10/21/14
0184083
10/31/14
P Donnoe & Associates Inc
Line Description: Sgt Test
0184084
10/31/14
P Eastside Costa Mesa Neighborhood
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001491.002
0184085
10/31/14
P Entenmann Rovin Company
Line Description: Dome Badge
0184086
10/31/14
P Enterprise Rent A Car
Line Description_ Undercover Cars
Undercover Cars
Undercover Cars
Undercover Cars
Undercover Cars
0184087
10/31/14
P Enterprise Rent A Car
Line Description: Monthly Lease Charge -Oct 14
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000023009 103.00
0000022865 2,725.00
0000002466 115.00
0000010228
517.50
0000020083
500.00
0000002130
529.00
0000002131
4,583.52
0000002131 5,063.20
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 12
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CIN Run Time 3.32:15 PM
-Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
95.00
0000006757
500.00
0184088
10131114
P Expo Propane Inc
233.08
0000002297
Line Description: Propane -Corp Yard
0184089
10/31/14
P FTOG Inc
Line Description_ Interim Buyer 10/13-10124/14
0184090
10/31/14
P Fed Fx Corp
Line Description. Ground Deiivery
Ground Delivery
0184091
10/31/14
P Fercano Dainera
Line Description Refund Citation K128312
0184092
10/31/14
P File Keepers LLC
Line Description Records Destruction -Sept 14
0184093
10/31/14
P Fire Information Support Services Inc
Line Description: 3rd Qtr 2014 CSFM
0184094
10/31/14
P Fitzgeralds Auto Care Center
Line Description: Smog & Repair -#104
0184095
10/31/14
P Gale Tuso
Line Description: I% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
0184096
10/31/14
P Galls LLC
Line Description: Duty Gears
Duty Holster - BLH
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000017819 438.45
0000021401 2,137.50
0000002190 80.20
0000023008
3.00
0000022380
95.00
0000006757
500.00
0000021295
197.93
0000017460
233.08
0000002297
1,246.20
Report ID. CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 13
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank. CIN Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0000021758
Line Description: Duty Holster - BRH
0000002211
Sales Tax (8.0%)
0184097 10/31/14
P Glenns Alignment & Brake Service
Line Description: Alignment --##180
0184098 10/31114
P Gloria Lemus
Line Description- Crime Scene/Forensic Photo
0184099 10/31/14
P Government Staffing Services Inc
Line Description. Interum Buyer 1 016-1 011 711 4
Temp Svs-Mgnt Anlys 1016-10/19
Temp Svs-Proj Mgr 10/6-10119
Temp Svs-Engr 10/6-10119114
Temp Svs-Engr 1 011 3-1 011 7
0184100 10/31/14
P Grainger
Line Description: Pressure Switch
Magnetic Motor Starter
0184101 10131114
P Hosford & Hosford Inc ALC
Line Description: Subpoena Dep Rfnd 001-00262818
0184102 10/31/14
P Hunter Systems Group Inc
Line Description: Mug Shot Camera Maint
0184103 10/31/14
P Ikuyo Geiman
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001492.002
0184104 10/31/14
P Industrial Metal Supply
Line Description: Stainless Plate
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000002344 110.00
0000017/39 242.15
0000022422 14,736.26
0000002393 452.46
0000023006
275.00
0000021758
299.00
0000002211
51.00
0000002653
114.01
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 14
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Steel 4 Mounting Brackets
0184105
10/31/14
P JD Lock & Key
0000005930
12.15
Line Description: Keys
0184106
10/31/14
P JTB Supply Company Inc
0000007814
7,589.16
Line Description: Meter Pedestal - Harbor/Adams
Salex Tax (8.00%)
0184107
10/31/14
P James G Brown
0000016259
145.30
Line Description: Arrest & Cntl Instrctr
0184108
10/31/14
P Jeff Tibbets
0000004161
405.00
Line Description: Vehicle Reflective Flages
0184109
10131/14
P John Deere Landscapes Inc
0000016331
357.06
Line Description: Irrigation Supplies
0184110
10/31/14
P Jose Ruiz
0000023010
5.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001488.002
0184111
10/31/14
P Joyce E Tillner
0000018762
65.65
Line Description: 1% Supplemental Pay Nov 2014
0184112
10/31/14
P Kabbara Engineering
0000002795
4,515.00
Line Description: On -Call Trffc Eng 8116-8131114
On -Call Trffc Eng 7/1-8/15/14
0184113
10/31/14
P Kellys Pool Service
0000013443
240.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. is
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Ren Time 3:32:15 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0000002882
Line Description: DRC Pool Cleaning -Oct 14
0184114 10/31114
P Keyser Marston Associates Inc
0000019179
Line Description: Civic Center Barrio -Sep 14
0000002960
Homeless Consulting -Seip 14
0184115 10/31114
P Kimball Midwest
Line Description: Shop Supplies
0184116 10/31/14
P La Opinion
Line Description: Subscription Rnwi for Jail
0184117 10/31/14
P Lawrence P Shield
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/22/14
0184118 10/31/14
P LexisNexis Risk Data Management Inc
Line Description: Public Records Access-Sep2014
0184119 10/31/14
P Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
Line Description: Legal -General
Legal -Personnel Matter
Legal -60th Anniversarylnvstgtn
Legal -Personnel Matter
0184120 10131114
P Like Nu Concrete Magic
Line Description: CMPD Concrete Repair
FS#5 Concrete Pad Repair
0184121 10/31/14
P Los Angeles Times
Line Description: Legal Notices for Pianning Div
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000002824 7,582.30
0000006819
802.15
0000002882
181.97
0000017089
78.00
0000019179
288.00
0000002960
2,431.50
0000022739 6,490.00
0000003000 153.31
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 16
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0184122
10/31/14
D Mar Co Equipment Company
0006620400
1,395.77
Line Description: Sweeper Parts
0184123
10/31/14
P Mar Vac Electronics Corporation
0000003049
11.29
Line Description: Mini Lamps
0184124
10131/14
P Mario Garcia
0000023002
43.50
Line Description: Refund Citation CM214081301 B
0184125
10/31/14
P Matthew Kaihewalu
0000022938
250.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001409.002
Refund Rec Receipt 2001409.002
0184126
10/31/14
P Mesa Hose & Supply
0000003146
64.80
Line Description: Hose for Unit #3B9
0184127
10/31/14
P Michael J Bolden
0000001329
46.00
Line Description: Basketball Referee 1017114
018412B
10/31/14
P Mike Linares Inc
0000002969
7,507.50
Line Description: CABG -Home Coord 8125-8/29114
CABG -Home Coord 9/1-9/5114
CDBG-Home Coord 9/8-9119114
0184129
10/31/14
P Mike Raahauges Shooting Enterprises
0000006853
440.00
Line Description: Range Fees for SWAT
0184130
10/31/14
P Motor Age Training
0000023000
4B1.96
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 17
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct3o,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Training Manual
0184131
10/31/14
P Motorola
0000003245
305.81
Line Description: Remote Microphones
0184132
10/31/14
P National Data & Surveying Services
0000021249
1,849.00
Line Description: Car Count Collection Svs
0184133
10/31/14
P Noack Trophy & Engraving Company
0000003360
84.24
Line Description. Name Badges for City Clerk
0184134
10/31/14
P Office Max Incorporated
0000020710
2,876.96
Line Description: Office Supplies -Senior Center
Office Supplies -IT
Office Supplies -PD Records
Office Supplies -NCC
Office Supplies -HR
Office Supplies -Bldg Safety
Office Supplies-Dev Svcs Admin
Office Supplies -Finance Admin
Office Supplies -Fire Admin
Office Supplies -CEO
Office Supplies Admin Svcs
Office Supplies -Senior Center
0184135
10/31/14
P Orange County Probation Department
0000003491
1,265.00
Line Description: Juvenile Court Work Prog
Juvenile Court Work Program
0184136
10/31/14
P Orpak USA Inc
0000015894
89.42
Line Description: Fuel Coils
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payabie Page No. 18
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
0184137
10131114
P Porterfield Enterprises LTD
0000003662
Line Description_ Under Hood Thermal Lining
Shop Supplies 4 Fleet Services
0184138
10/31/14
P Protection One
0000006543
Line Description: Historical Soc Bldg Alarm Svcs
0184139
10/31/14
P Quentin W McKenzie
0000011175
Line Description: Basketball Referee 10/21/14
Basketball Referee 10/27/14
0184140
10/31/14
P R & B Products USA LLC
0000019304
Line Description: Pressure Washer Repair
0184141
10/31/14
P Rand Foster
0000010791
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/20/14
0184142
10/31/14
P Randall Buck
0000005730
Line Description: CSC Chptr 11 B Accessibility
0184143
10/31/14
P Randstad Technologies LP
0000022571
Line Description: Temp IT Support Staff 911-10/5
0184144
10/31/14
P Recreonics Inc
0000022704
Line Description. racing Lane Lines
-
Sales & Use Tax Payable
Shipping Fee
Sales Tax (8.00%)
0184145
10/31/14
P Redemption Community Church
0000023003
Payment Amt
1,093.21
53.55
92.00
571.06
52.00
175.00
5,720.00
1,217.42
425.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 19
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Rfnd Special Event Permit Fees
0184146
10/31/14
P Ricky Loya
0000022490
78.00
Line Description: Softball Umpire -10122114
0184147
10/31/14
P Rincon Truck Center
0000013236
451.81
Line Description: Oil, Fuel, & Air Filters
Lamp Assemblies
0184148
10/31/14
P Robert Newman
0000018053
253.00
Line Description: Basketball Referee 10/27/14
Basketball Referee 9115-9122
0184149
10/31/14
P Roger Cole
0000023004
111.50
Line Description: Refund Citation K127674
0184150
10/31/14
P Roto Rooter Service & Plumbing Company
0000003863
1,459.82
Line Description: Plumbing Svc @ Wilson Park
Fire Sta#4 ADA Improvements
0184151
10/31/14
P S B Baker & Associates Inc
0000023005
11.00
Line Description: PD Report Refund 4 Overpayment
0184152
10/31/14
P SC Fuels
0000013839
14,514.07
Line Description: Diesel Fuei for Corp Yard
Diesel Fuei for Fire Sta#5
0184153
10/31/14
P Safeway Sign Co.
0000016310
5,219.47
Line Description: Blank Face
Sign Face
Sales Tax (8.00%)
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 20
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ret Date
Status Remit To
0184154 10/31/14
P Scientia Consulting Group Inc
Line Description: IT Consultant 9/21-1014114
0184155 10/31/14
P Sears Commercial One
Line Description: Recliners FS46
Sales Tax (8.00°/x)
0164156 10/31114
P Sierra Java Inc
Line Description: Coffee Supplies 4 City Council
0184157 10131/14
P SimplexGhnnell LP
Line Description: Fire/Life/Safety Testing -Comm
FirelLifelSafety Testing-FS#5
Fire/Life/Safety Testing-FS43
Fire/LifelSafety Testing -PD
Fire/LifelSafety Testing-FS#6
Fire/LifelSafety Testing -NCC
Fire/Life/Safety Testing -CH
FirelLifelSafety Testing -DRC
Fire/Life/Safety Testing-SrCtr
Fire/Life/Safety Testing -WSS
0184158 10/31/14
P Simplot Partners
Line Description: Chemicals for Parks
Chemicals 4 Parks & Sportsflds
0184159 10/31/14
P Smith Pipe & Supply Inc
Line Description: Irrigation Supplies for Parks
0184160 [0131114
P Southern California Edison Company
Line Description: 555 112 Paularino9/23-10123114
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000021410 6,321.00
0000003976 2.099.52
0000004027 155.90
0000011336 3,252.36
0000003061 674.02
0000004049 143.77
0000004088 554.83
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 21
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Lina Description: 867 Prospect 9123-10123114
2301 Harbor 9124-10124114
3120 Manistree 9123-10123114
0184161
10/31/14
P Southern California Edison Company
0000004695
2,948.83
Line Description: 2247 Republic St Light Install
0184162
10131/14
P Southem California Gas Company
0000004092
813.86
Line Description: 2310 Placentia 9123-10121114
NCC 9122--10120114
2300 Placentia 9123-10121114
FS #3 9122-10120114
DRC 9/22-10120114
DRC Pool 9122-10120114
567 W 19th 9/22-10120114
FS #2 9127-10122114
FS #4 9123-10121114
0184163
10/31/14
P Sprint
0000015635
227.62
Line Description: PD Cell Phone Usage
0184164
10/31/14
P Stancil Corporation
0000021230
12,780.00
Line Description: Stancil Recording Upgrade
0184165
10/31/14
P State of California Dept of Justice
0000001534
12,977.00
Line Description: Fingerprint Apps for Sept 2014
0184166
10/31/14
P Steadfast Contracting Inc
0000021584
2,565.65
Line Description: Install Data Drops 5th Floor
Computer Data Line Installatn
0184167
10/31/14
P Steen Security Inc
0000015257
479.88
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 22
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle'
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Line Description: Sr Center Security Monitoring
0184168
10/31/14
P Steve Clever
0000010800
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/23/14
0184169
10/31/14
P StradIing Yocca Carlson & Rauth
0000004168
Line Description: Legal -General
Legal -General
Legal -Habitat for Humanity
Legal -CM Family Village
Legal -Costa Mesa Village
Legal -Civic Center Barrio
Legal -Single Family Rehab Prog
Legal -General
0184170
10/31/14
P Ted Gibson Masonry & Son Inc
0000019510
Line Description: Carnary Dr Retaining Wall
0184171
10/31/14
P Tessco
0000004822
Line Description: Antennas
0184172
10/31/14
P Thales Consulting Inc
0000010332
Line Description: Prep of City's Street Report
Prep of FYI 3-14 St CntrilrsRpt
0184173
10131114
P The Bank of New York Mellon
0000005664
Line Description: Admin Fee -2003 Tax Allocation
0184174
10/31/14
P The Bode Technology Group Inc
0000018930
Line Description: Bode S.I.T. Collectors
Shipping Fee
Sales Tax (8.00°/x)
Payment Amt
78.00
9,618.30
9,136.30
437.68
3.700.00
1,802.00
2,280.20
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 23
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle.
Payment Ref
Date
States Remit To
0164175
10/31/14
P The UPS Store #0247
Line Description: Shipping Fees
0184176
10/31/14
P Theodore Robins Ford
Line Description: Lever for Unit#104
Airbag Lamp for Unit#720
Pin for Unit#104
Fan Motor & Relay for Unit#705
Switch for Unit#785
Sensor Assembly for Unit#751
Relay - Auto Part
0184177
10/31/14
P Thomson Reuters
Line Description: Clear Services Subscription
0184178
10/31/14
P Time Warner Cable
Line Description: Equipment Fees I Oil 6-1 111 511 4
Equipment Fees 9129-10128114
0184179
10/31/14
P Tomark Sports Inc
Line Description: Materials for TeWinkle AC
0184180
10/31/14
P US Postal Service
Line Description: Postage for Postage Meter
0184181
10/31/14
P US Postmaster
Line Description: Standard Mail Fee
0184182
10/31/14
P Uline
Line Description: Cable Ties for PD Property
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000012655
0000004245
0000022223
0000011202
0000004273
0000004376
0000004377
0000010970
460.31
FRIUW-1
234.70
WOW13d
931.56
10, 000.00
10,000.00
Ki34EIf.7
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 24
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0184183
10/31/14
P United Rotary Brush Corp
0000003525
346.40
Line Description- Street Sweeper Brooms
0184184
10/31/14
P Verizon Wireless
0000008717
4,179.24
Line Description: Broadband Svcs for Sep 2014
0184185
10/31/14
P Vic Duong
0000011215
130.00
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10120-10121114
0184186
10/31/14
P Vision Internet Providers Inc
0000010175
210.00
Line Description: Web Hosting & Mairt Oct 2014
0184187
10/31/14
P Vulcan Materials Company
0000007403
220.32
Line Description: Asphalt for Patching Potholes
Asphalt for Patching Potholes
Asphalt for Patching Potholes
0184188
10/31114
P Walters Wholesale Electric Co
0000011706
1,005.36
Line Description: Senior Center Light Bulbs
Senior Center Light Bulbs
Electrical Supplies
Flourescent Light Bulbs
0184189
10/31/14
P Waterline Technologtes Inc
0000014520
326.36
Line Description: Pool Chemicals for DRC
Pool Chemicals for DRC
0184190
10/31/14
P Waxie Sanitary Supply
0000004480
12.97
Line Description: ADA Signage for 4th Floor
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 25
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CIN Run Time 3:32:15 PM
Cycle: AWKLY
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0184191 10/31/14
P Wayne Electric Company Inc
Line Description: Light Tower Parts
Light Tower Parts
0184192 10/31/14
P Wayne Ritchie
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/22/14
Softball Umpire 10/23/14
0184193 10/31/14
P Westates
Line Description: Name Plate for PD
Mail Box Name Plate
0184194 10/31/14
P Youth Employment Services
Line Description: CDBG Grant Subrecipient Agreem
End of Report
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000004482 3,634.20
0000022963 156.00
0000004505 24.70
0000004607 4,750.00
TOTAL $867,747.65
Report ID: CCM20010 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
CCM OVERFLOW CHECK LISTING Run Date Oct 30,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:32:32 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status
Remit To
0184036
10/31/14
0
Mesa Conso€idated Water District
Line Description: Overflow
0184037
10/31/14
O
Mesa Consolidated Water District
Line Description: Overflow
0164045
10/31/14
0
AT & T
Line Description: Overflow
End of Report
Remit ID
0000003144
0000003144
Payment Ami
0.00
0.00
0000001107 0.00
TOTAL 0.00
Report ID: CCM2001V City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. i
CCM VOID CHECK LISTING Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:22:56 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref Cancel Date Status Remit To Remit iD
0181604 10/22/2014 V Western Transit Systems Inc 0000011971
Line Description. Check never received. Stop payment placed on 10/22/14 and check re -issued.
005
End of Report
Payment Date Payment Amt
07/11/14 (6,136.83)
TOTAL ($6,136.83)
Report I❑: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run ❑ate Oct 23,2014
Bank: COM1 Run Time 1:53:41 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
❑ate
Status Remit To
Remit I❑
Payment Amt
000821
1012414
P Apple One Employment Services
0000001055
3,562.16
Line Description: Temp Svs-Cntrl Svs9/15-9119114
Temp Svs-Rec 9115-9/19114
Temp Svs-Eng 911 5-911 811 4
Temp Svs-Eng 911 5-911 911 4
Temp Svs-Eng 09/06/14
Temp Svs-Eng 9122-9125/14
Temp Svs-Eng 912-915/14
000822
10/24/14
P Hub Auto Supply
0000002584
2,325.81
Line Description: Auto Paris -Sept 2014
000823
10/24/14
P Smith Pipe & Supply Inc
0000004049
958.86
Line Description: Backflow Enclosure Newport/Sup
Irrigation Electrical Control Ir
000824
1012404
P Ware Disposal Inc
0000000255
17,260.46
Line Description: Refuse Collection June 2014
City Refuse Sres July 2014
City Refuse Sres Sept 2014
TOTAL $24,107.29
End of Report
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: DDP1 Run Time 1:28:28 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
003141
10/24/14
P Costa Mesa Employees Association
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
003142
10/24114
P Costa Mesa Executive Club
Line Description- Payroll Deduction Check 1422
003143
10/24/14
P Costa Mesa Firefighters Association
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
003144
10/24/14
P Costa Mesa Police Association
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
003145
10/24/14
P Costa Mesa Police Management Assn
Line Descnption: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
End of Report
Remit 1D Payment Amt
0000006284 4,269.91
0000006286 200.00
0000001812 5,478.40
0000001819 7,560.00
0000005082 150.00
TOTAL $17,658.31
Report [D: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No- 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 20,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:01:15 PM
cycle:
Payment Ref Date
0183871 10/20114
Status Remit To
P Arts & Leaming Conservatory
Line Description. Literature2 Life Theater Prog
End of Report
Remit 1D
0000020832
Payment Amt
2,700.00
TOTAL $2,700.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 20,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:0412 PM
Payment Ref Date
0183872 10/20/14
Status Remit To
P Irene Engard
Line Description: Exp $ Summer Art Bash
End of Report
Remit ID
0000014/83
Payment Amt
0114K. -A
TOTAL $221.62
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0183873
10/24114
P Affant Communication
0000013540
31,586.19
Line Description: Annual Affant Maint. Agreement
Annual CH Lanner ThreatStop Ma
Annual PD Lanner ThreatStop Ma
0183874
10124!14
P Ailstar Fire Equipment Inc
0000000986
18,869.22
Line Description: Sales Tax (8.00%)
Turnout Pant
Turnout Coat
0183875
10/24/14
P Civil Source
0000017030
98,310.00
Line Description: CIP Proj Staff Support -Aug 14
CIP Proj Staff Support -Jul 14
0183876
10/24/14
P Econolite Control Products Inc
0000002080
26,172.74
Line Description: Sales Tax (8.00%)
Signal Cabinet
0183877
10124/14
P Southern California Edison Company
0000004088
53,958.65
Line Description: 199 Broadway 911 6-1 011 611 4
Fac & Equip 812&-9/25114
401 Broadway 9116-10116/14
1040 Paularino 9117-10117114
0183878
10/24/14
P West Coast Arborists Inc
0000004498
30,239.00
Line Description: Tree Maint Srvcs 9/16-9/30114
0183879
10/24/14
P A -Z Bus Sales Inc
0000001143
27.33
Line Desctiption: Rubrall Cap -#527
0183880
10/24/14
P AMEC Environment & Infrastructure Inc
0000021354
10,602.97
Report 1D_ CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 2
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
Cycle.
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Line Description: NPDES Prog Suport-7125114
0183881
10/24114
P ARCO Business Solutions
0000018562
Line Description: Fuel 1011-10/15114
0183882
10/24/14
P AT & T
0000001107
Line Description: Wakeham Park 9/10-1019114
Firewall Fire Sta#1 9110-1019
0183883
10/24/14
P AT & T
0000001107
Line Description: 911 Cama Trunks 10114-11113/14
0183884
10/24/14
P Aikido Federation of California
0000000937
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183885
10/24/14
P Alans Lawnmower & Garden Center Inc
0000019220
Line Description: CleanlAdj Throttle Lever
Parts & Tune -Up Handheld
Repair CouplingNeshaft Assy
Small Equipment Repair
Fuel Mix 4 Chain Saws
Tune-up/Carburetor Rebuild
Handheld Tune-uplRepair Parts
Handheld Tune-up/Repair Parts
Handheld Tune-up/Parts
0183886
10/24/14
P Alex Milov
0000021598
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fal{ 14
0183887
10/24/14
P Allied Nationwide Security Inc
0000022698
Line Description Sr Cntr Security Guard 9116--30
Payment Amt
341.52
33.96
16729
127.75
645.64
70.00
1,233.43
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 3
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
46.00
0183888
10/24/14
P Alonzo H Parker III
14,207.70
Line Description: Basketball Referee 10/14/14
0183889
10/24/14
P AndersonPenna Partners Inc
Line Description: Bristol Median Proj 8/30-9126
0183890
10/24/14
P Antje Morris
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183891
10/24/14
P AutoZone
Line Description: Car Dusters
0183892
10/24/14
P Barbara Burks
Line Description: instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183893
10/24/14
P Bee Busters Inc
Line Description: Bee Removal
0183894
10/24/14
P Bentley Systems Inc
Line Description: Software Subscription Renewal
0183895
10/24/14
P Bishop Company
Line Description: Tree Maint Materials
0183896
10/24/14
P Brandi Knox
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000016232
46.00
0000021535
1,600.00
0000003234
14,207.70
0000019364 168.48
0000001280 1,250.60
0000007572
110.00
0000014773
2,009.40
0000001278
998.65
0000020652 586.95
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 4
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run bate Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3.23.14 PM
Cycle-'
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
0183897
10/24/14
P CDW Government Inc
0000005402
Line Description: Docking Station
Color Printer
0183898
10/24/14
P CNC Engineering Inc
0000008798
Line Description: Redhill Median Proj-Sep 14
0183899
10/24/14
P CSULB Foundation
0000009724
Line Description: Adv Field FvidenceTech 11117-19
0183900
10124114
P California Forensic Phlebotomy Inc
0000001500
Line Description: Blood Test Svs-Sept 2014
0183901
10/24/14
P Cherie Thiers
0000003185
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183902
10/24/14
P Cheryl Skidmore
0000012479
Line Descnpfion: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183903
10/24/14
P Cintas Document Management
0000016108
Line Description: Document Destruction -Sep 14
0183904
10/24/14
P City of Mission Viejo
0000022310
Line Description: IT Tech Svs 5/1-5115/14
IT Tech Svs 711-7115114
0183905
10/24/14
P City of Newport Beach
0000003327
Line Description: ShrdTrafSignal Maint Jan-Jun14
Payment Amt
842.44
2,350.00
310.00
3,041.30
73.13
58.10
01*71.7
10.790.00
1,651.76
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 5
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
0183906
10/24/14
P City of Santa Ana
0000003917
Line Description: SrdTrfcSigna] Maint Jan-Junl4
0183907
10/24/14
P Clean Street
0000001098
Line Description: Pressure Wash Sidewalk -Sep 14
Sweeping Sidewalk & Street
Pressure Wash Sidewalk -Jul 14
Sweeping Sidewalk & Street
Pressure Wash Sidewalk -Aug 14
Sweeping Sidewalk & Street
0183908
10/24/14
P CompuCom Systems
0000004859
Line Description: Adobe Acropbat 4 HCS
0183909
10/24/14
P Corel-ogic Information Solutions Inc
0000004774
Line Description: RealQuest 5vs-�Sept 14
RealQuest Svs-Sept 14
0183910
10/24/14
P Costa Mesa Auto Glass
0000010001
Line Description: Window Tint -#527
Window Tint -#526
Window Tint -#522
0183911
10/24/14
P Costa Mesa Bark Park Foundation
0000022995
Line Description: Stage Platforms
0183912
10/24/14
P Costa Mesa High School Foundation
0000019566
Line Description: Home For The Holidays Spnsrshp
0183913
10124/14
P Costa Mesa High School Foundation
0000019566
Line Description: 2014 CMHs Home Tour Ad
Payment Amt
736.63
1,910-()0
269.38
471.25
873.60
160.00
1,000-00
1,000.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 6
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
C cle: AINKLY
Payment Fief Date
Status Remit To
0183914 10/24/14
P Costa Mesa Lock S. Key
Line Description: Rekey Locks and Replacements
Sales Tax (8.00%)
Senior Center New Masterkey Sy
Sales Tax (8.00%)
New Lockset 4 Room #1 B
0183915 10/24/14
P County of Orange Auditor Controller
Line Description: Refuse Disposal @CO-Sep14
0183916 10/24/14
P Daniels Tire Service
Line Description: Tires
0183917 10/24/14
P Data Ticket Inc
Line Description: Prkng Citation Procssng-Sep14
0183918 10/24/14
P Dawna Bans&
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183919 10/24/14
P De Lage Landon Financial Svs
Line Description: Copier Lease 1011-10131114
Copier Lease 1011-10131114
0183920 10/24/14
P Debbie Dickens
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183921 10/24/14
P Department of Conservation
Line Description_ SMTP Fees Collected Jul-Sep14
Remit !D
0000001817
0000003473
0000001922
0000010929
0000001185
0000019172
0000010708
0000001530
Payment Amt
2,366.25
1,799.85
1,369.55
4,333.03
175.50
265.82
297.05
3,720.90
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 7
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3.23:14 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0183922
10/24/14
P Discovery Benefits
0000021353
475.30
Line Description: Flexbl Spndg Admin Fee-Sep14
0183923
10124/14
P bog Dealers Inc
0000002018
905.55
Line Description- Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183924
10/24/14
P Eberhard Equipment Company
0000002078
249.96
Line Description: Tires -#134
0183925
10/24/14
P Entenmann Rcvin Company
0000002130
786.11
Line Description: Name Bars
Name Bars
Flat Badges & Cases
0183926
10124/14
P Fed Ex Corp
0000002190
30.75
Line Description: Ground Del€very
Ground Delivery
0183927
10/24/14
P Felice llkcagla
0000005927
975.65
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183928
10/241'4
P Fitzgeralds Auto Care Center
O000021295
705.54
Line Description: Repair-FuelEvaporativeCanister
0183929
10/24/14
P Flint Trading Inc
0000002242
5,937.63
Line Description: Installation Tool Kit
Senior Center Yellow Truncated
Sales Tax (8.00°/x)
0183930
10/24/14
P G & W Towing
0000002289
125.00
Report ID. CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 8
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23.14 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Line Descnption- Towing Svs-#728
0183931
10/24/14
P Government Staffing Services Inc
Line Description: Temp Svs-Buyer 711 4-712 511 4
0183932
10/24/14
P Harbor Radiator
Line Description: A1C repair -#180
A1C Repair -#366
0183933
10/24/14
P Hayes Surveying
Line Description: Canary Dr Boundary Line
0183934
10/24/14
P Healthy U
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183935
10/24114
P Hendersons Car Audio
Line Description: Replace Radio -#180
0183936
10/24/14
P Hi Standard Automotive LLC
Line Description: LFD Sptlgt Retrofit Kits
0183937
10/24/14
P Hireright Inc
Line Description: Credit Check
0183938
10124114
P Hyatt Legal Plans Inc
Line Description: Pre -Paid Legal Svs-Oct 14
0183939
10/24/14
P IDS Group Inc
Line Description: Architectural Services -9119114
Remit ID
0000022422
0000002457
0000017777
0000012092
0000022989
0000002521
0000021348
0000022383
0000022643
Payment Amt
2,700.00
1,062.36
1,000.00
77.35
259.20
328.42
8.25
1,794.00
14,188.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 9
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank. CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
Cycle: gjajKi 24
Payment Ret
Date
Status Remit To
110.41
0000002711
Line Description: Plans Review & Testing -9119114
0183940
10/24/14
P Interinsurance Exchange of the Auto Club
Line Description: Vehicle Damage Stlmnt 915113
0183941
10/24/14
P Interstate Batteries of California Coast
Line Description_ Shop Supplies
0183942
10/24/14
P Irvine Pipe & Supply Inc
Line Description: Water Heater Pilot Assm
0183943
10/24/14
P Irvine Ranch Water District
Line Description: 220 23rd 918-1018114
170 Del Mar 919-1018114
0183944
10/24/14
P J B General Contractors
Line Description: Refund Permit PS13-00191
0183945
10/24/14
P Janet MiiGan
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183946
10/24/14
P Jerome A Williams Sr
Line Description: Basketball Referee 10/14/14
0183947
10/24/14
P Jessica Conder
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fal[ 14
0183948
10/24/14
P John Deere Landscapes Inc
Line Description: Supplies
Remit 1D
Payment Amt
0000000479
9,500.00
0000002700
110.41
0000002711
76.73
0000005112
226.93
0000022990 350.00
0000007795 2,501.20
0000014471 46.00
0000011010 307.45
0000016331 875.23
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 10
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
G cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0183949
10/24/14
P Joyce Patrick
0000021362
164.50
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183950
10124/14
P Kabbara Engineering
0000002795
3,990.00
Line Description: On -Call Tffc Engnr9116-9130114
On -Call Tffc Engnr911-9115114
0183951
10/24/14
P Kathy Andruss
0000022992
546.00
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183952
10/24114
P Kathy Haney
0000013233
109.20
Line Description: Instructor Pymnt-Fall 14
0183953
10/24/14
P Knorr Systems Inc
0000005036
79.40
Line Description: CO2 Diffuser for DRC Pool
0183954
10/24/14
P Lana Tran DDS
0000022988
59.00
Line Description: Refund Live Scan Fee
0183955
10/24/14
P Larry Kaban
0000002794
396.18
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0183956
10/24/14
P Lawrence P Shieid
0000017089
560.00
Line Description: Softball Umpire 9114-10119/14
0183957
10/24/14
P LexisNexis
0000010987
153.00
Line Description: Online Legal Updates Sept 2014
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 11
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0183958 10124114
P Loomis
Line Description: Armored Car Services Sept 2014
0183959 10/24/14
P Los Angeles Times
Line Description_ Legal Notices for City Clerk
0183960 10/24/14
P Lynnelle Harmer
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001489.002
0183961 10/24/14
P Mar Vac Electronics Corporation
Line Description: Torch Kit
0183962 10/24/14
P Maria L D'Angelo
Line Description Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0183963 10/24/14
P Mark Anguiano
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001490.002
0183964 10/24/14
P Matrix Imaging Products Inc
Line Description: Document Imaging Svcs 912014
0183965 10/24/14
P Mesa Consolidated Water District
Line Description: 3191 112 Airport 8111-10/13/14
3187 112 Redhill 811 1-1 011 311 4
1595 112 Nwprt 811 2-1 011 411 4
567 W 18th 8112-10/15114
695 W 19th 811 2-1 011 511 4
FS #3 8112-10115114
695 112 W 19th 811 2-1 011 511 4
DRC 8112-10/15114
FS #3 8112-10115114
Remit ID
0000019082
0000003000
0000022991
0000003049
0000020378
0000020588
0000018324
0000003144
Payment Amt
859.68
1,075.94
139.00
39.44
377.00
76.00
5,040.00
9,577.64
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa accounts Payable Page No. 12
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2414
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
Cycle: ti t
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
Line Description: 1845 Park 8112-1 011 5114
1860 Anaheim 8112-10!15114
Historical Soc 8112-10/15/14
1870 Anaheim 8/12 1 011 511 4
NCC 8/12-10/15114
NCC 8/12-10/15114
NCC 811 2-1 011 511 4
Sr Cntr 918-10115/14
567 W 18th 8/12-10115114
570 W 18th 8112-10115/14
1741 Superior 8/12-10;14114
0183966 10/24/14
P Mesa Smog
Line Description Smog Inspection for Unit 4763
0183967 10/24/14
P Michele Christensen
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001493.002
0183968 10/24/14
P NetMotion Wireless Inc
Line Description: Software Maint RnwI0ct14-Sep15
0183969 10124/14
P Newport Awning Company Inc
Line Description: Replaced Wind Damaged Canopy
0183970 10/24/14
P Newport Emergency Medical Group
Line Description: Emerg Rm-Industrial Injury -AA
0183971 10/24/14
P Niki Parker
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0183972 10124114
P North American Youth Activities
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000020735 56.75
0000022994 49.00
0000015484 5,375.00
0000022986 560.00
0000012967 273.42
0000002913 340.60
0000022736 737.10
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No_ 13
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3.23:14 PM
C cle_
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0183973 10/24/14
P OC Playball
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0183974 10/24/14
P Occu Med
Line Description: QA Services for October 2014
Pre -Employment Exam Evaluation
0183975 10/24/14
P Office Max Incorporated
Line Description: Office Supplies -CEO
Office Supplies-Treas Mgmt
Office Supplies -PD Records
Office Supplies-Maint Srvcs
Office Supplies -1T
Office Supplies-Contruct Mgmt
Office Supplies-Dev Srvcs Admn
Office Supplies -Finance Admin
Office Supplies -HR
Office Supplies -Fire Admin
0183976 10/24/14
P Orange Coast College
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0183977 10/24/14
P Orange County Conservation Corps
Line Description: Labor for Planting Shrubs
0183978 10/24/14
P Orange County Humane Society
Line Description: Kennel Fees for October 2014
0183979 10/24/14
P Orange County Vector Control District
Line Description: Vector Control Srvcs-Wetlands
Vector Control Srvcs--Wetlands
Remit ID
0000020534
0000020710
00000055/0
0000003442
0000021750
Payment Amt
186.88
2,618.06
1.612.25
101.50
6,948.00
6,096.50
378.47
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 14
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23.14 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
20.59
0000013236
78.80
0183980
10/24/14
P Pat Hill
500.00
0000021496
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0183981
10/24/14
P RPW Services Inc
Line Description: LardscapeWeedCntrlSts Sept2014
Rodent Contro{ Parks Sept2014
LandscapeWeedCrtrlPrks Sep2014
0183982
10/24/14
P Ricky Loya
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/16/14
0183983
10/24/14
P Ricoh USA Inc
Line Description: CEO Copier Usage Sept 2014
0183984
10/24/14
P Rincon Truck Center
Line Description: Shop Supplies for Fleet
0183985
10/24/14
P Robert G Patterson
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0183986
10/24/14
P Robert Hanson
Line Description: Clothing Allowance Reimb 14-15
0183987
10/24/14
P Rockey Murata Landscape
Line Description: Irrigation Repairs @FV Dev Ctr
0183988
10/24/14
P Ronald Morelos
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001495.002
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000002532 282.75
0000012440 5,000.42
0000022490
84.00
0000007311
20.59
0000013236
78.80
0000014499
468.00
0000014289
500.00
0000021496
1,000.00
0000002782
100.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 15
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
156.00
0000013839
3,108.15
0183989
10/24/14
P Roy Center
520.00
0000004629
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0183990
10/24/14
P Ryan Lee
504.00
0000022587
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fail 2014
0183991
10/24/14
P SC Fuels
Line Description: Diesel Fuel for Fire Sta#2
Diesel Fuel for Fire Sta#6
0183992
10124114
P Santa Ana College
Line Description: Pre -Academy Trng-3 Recruits
0183993
10/24/14
P Shangri La Construction
Line Description: Refund Permit PS14-00339
018a994
10/24/14
P SolarCity Corporation
Line Description: NCC 911-9/30114
0183995
10/24/14
P Southern California Gas Company
Line Description: Sr Cntr 918-9122114
0183996
10/24/14
P Steve Clever
Line Description: Softball Umpire 9117-10!16/14
0183997
10124114
P Stickman Graphic
Line Description: Install Decals on Astro Van
Decals 4 Police Explorers Vans
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000002158
1,362.41
0000022993
156.00
0000013839
3,108.15
0000003752
2,939.40
0000022627
520.00
0000004629
2,531.15
0000004092
968.38
0000010800
504.00
0000022587
1,555-00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 16
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Sank: CIN Run Time 3:23:14 PM
cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
0183998
10/24/14
P Straps Unlimited
00000/9773
Line Description: EMS Bags
0183999
1C/24114
P Susan Szanto
0000016609
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0184000
10124/14
P The Home Depot
0000002560
Line Description: Materials for Snoopy House She
State Fees for Paint & Lumb
Sales Tax (8.00%)
Shipping Fee
0184001
10/24/'!4
P Theodore Robins Ford
0000004245
Line Description: Wheel Cover for Unit#647
A/C Part for Unit#647
Tube Assembly for Unit#705
Credit for Core Return
Credit for Core Return
Shim, Flange for Unit#718
Shims for Unit#718
Starter Motor
Switch Assembly for Unit#706
Parking Light for Unit#217
Relay for Unit#702
0184002
10/24/14
P Time Warner Cable
0000011202
Line Description: Internet Services 1 011 7-1 111 6
Internet Services 10118-11117
Internet Services 1 011 8-1 1/17
0184003
10/24/14
P Tina Seri
0000010137
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001497.002
Payment Amt
302.40
95.88
4,565.31
666.27
2,035.00
200.00
Report]D: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 17
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0184004
10/24/14
P Tomark Sports Inc
0000004273
603.75
Line Description: Materials 4 TW Athletic Complx
0184005
10/24/14
P Trifytt Sports LLC
0000019031
1,059.83
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0184006
10/24/14
P Turnout Maintenance Company LLC
0000020182
414.40
Line Description: Turnout Clean & Repairs -5 Empl
0184007
10/24/14
P United Rotary Brush Corp
0000003525
259.80
Line Description: Street Sweeper Brooms
0184008
10/24/14
P VWR Intemational Corp
0000011012
827.62
Line Description: Chloroform for PD
0184009
10/24/14
P Vulcan Materials Company
0000007403
295.17
Line Description: Asphalt for Patching Potholes
Asphalt for Patching Potholes
Asphalt for Patching Potholes
Asphalt for Patching Potholes
0184010
10/24114
P Waterline Technologies Inc
0000014520
325.55
Line Description: DRC -Pool ChemicalsiTest Agents
0184011
10/24/14
P Wayne Ritchie
0000022963
168.00
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/15/14
Softball Umpire 10/17/14
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 18
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3:23:14 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
0184012
10/24/14
P West Coast Dance Arts
0000021602
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0184013
10124114
P Westates
0000004505
Line Description: Self Inking Stamps for Pad
0184014
10/24/14
P Western Transit Systems Inc
0000011971
Line Description: Sr Mobility Prog May 2014
Sr Mobility Prog May 2014
0184015
10/24/14
P Westminster Press Inc
0000008619
Line Description: Printing of Charter Mailers
0184016
10/24/14
P Yellow Cab Co
0000021749
Line Description: NIFT Transportation Sucs918-24
0184017
10/24/14
P Young Rembrandts
0000018685
Line Description: Instructor Payment Fall 2014
0184018
10/24/14
P Yuan Hung Henry Huang
0000022996
Line Description: Safety Assessment Prog-PF
Safety Assessment Prog-MA
Safety Assessment Prog-MV
Safety Assessment Prog-RB
Safety Assessment Prog-PP
Safety Assessment Prog-KN
Safety Assessment Prog-EC
Safety Assessment Prog-JJ
Safety Assessment Prog-CC
Safety Assessment Prog-DA
Payment Amt
1,437.45
95.44
6,136.83
1,582.16
206.00
116.03
4,500.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 19
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 3.23:14 PM
Cycle: AWKI
Payment Ref Date
0184019 10/24/14
0184020 10/24/14
Status Remit To
P Zee Medical Service Company
Line Description: 1 st Aid Supplies 4 New CY
1st Aid Supplies
P Zoll Medical Corporation
Line Description: Battery Pack
Sales Tax (8.00%)
Shipping Fee
End of Report
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000004615 94.17
0000021290 2,346.22
TOTAL $476,990.62
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 23,2014
Bank: CIN Run Time 3:41:05 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
0184021
10/24/14
P CaIPERS Long -Term Care Program
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
0184022
10/24/14
P Community Health Charities
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
0184023
10/24/14
P Robin Stafford
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
0184024
10/24/14
P State of California
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
01 B4025
10/24/14
P Tamra Williams
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
01 B4026
10/24/14
P Treasurer of Virginia
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1422
End of Report
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000006287 189.40
0000008015 10.00
0000021522 804.42
0000001546 1 B5.00
0000002941 1.5B9.08
0000014648 263.50
TOTAL $3,041.40
Report ID: CCM2001V City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
CCM VOID CHECK LISTING Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:06 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref Cancel Date Status Remit To Remit ID Payment Date Payment Amt
0182542 10/13/2014 v Renee Cana 0000022812 08/22/14 (80.00)
Line Description: Check never received due to incorrect address. Stop payment placed on 10/13/14 and check re -issued on
TOTAL ($80.00)
Q•,
80 • OD -
End of Report
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. i
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Hank: COM1 Run Time 1:57:12 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
000817
10/17/14
P Apple One Employment Services
0000001055
4,709.52
Line Description: Temp Svs-Cntrl Svs918-9112114
Temp Svs-Cntrl Svs912-915
Temp Svs-Rec 9/8-9/12114
Temp Svs--Eng919-9/12/14
Temp Svs-Rec 912-915114
Temp Svs-Public Svs 913-916
Temp Svs-Eng 918-9111114
000818
10/17/14
P Matrix Imaging Products Inc
0000018324
8,120.00
Line Description: On Site Scanning Svcs7121-7125
On Site Scanning Svcs7/28-8129
000819
10!17114
P Smith Pipe & Supply Inc
0000004049
2,402.16
Line Description: Irrigation Supplies for Parks
Irrigation Supplies for Parks
Irrigation Supplies for Parks
Irrigation Supplies for Parks
Irrigation Supplies for Parks
000820
10/17/14
P Ware Disposal Inc
0000000255
8,831.71
Line Description: City Refuse Services Sept 2014
ApplianceslGreen Waste
City Refuse Services Oct 2014
TOTAL $24,063.39
End of Report
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
0183720
10117/14
P Albert Grover & Associates Inc
0000014065
Line Description: Traffic Signal Synch -Aug 14
0183721
10/17/14
P CAA Planning Inc
0000021997
Line Description: EIR #105 Consulting 611-8131
0183722
10/17/14
P Kabbara Engineering
0000002795
Line Description: PS&E Engrng Svs 713-9115/14
0183723
10/17/14
P LINA
0000015623
Line Description: Administrative Fee Aug 2014
Premium for Sept 2014
0183724
10/17/14
P LonerockInc
0000016944
Line Description: Retentions Payable Proj 914-08
Water Qualtiy &Storm Drain Imp
0183725
10/17/14
P Mesa Consolidated Water District
0000003144
Line Description: 2141 Tustin 817-1019/14
402 112 Broadway 815-1016114
1800 Newport 814-1 01611 4
134 112 E 19th 815-1017114
257 E 16h 7/31-1011114
1648 112 Newport 811-1011/14
111 Fair 8/27-9129114
970 Arlington 8/27-9129114
2621 112 Harbor 8/27-9129114
234 112 E 17th 814-10/2/14
3202 Harbor 812 7-912 911 4
3581 Harbor 812 7-912 911 4
1400 Sunflower 8127-9/29114
2800 Bear 8/27-9129/14
3333 Bear 8/27-9129/14
Payment Amt
28,382.83
15,192.50
32, 367.30
19,042.81
359,218.75
37,825.43
teport ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No.
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
3ank: Cly Run Time 2:58:53 Ph
;ycle: AW --KI Y -
Payment Ref Date
0183727 10/17/14
0183728 10/17/14
Status Remit To
Line Description: 3333 Bear 8127-9/29114
970 Arlington 8127-9/29/14
1550 E Mesa Verde 711 7-911 711 4
2229 Newport 8127-9129114
2600 Fariview 8127-9/29114
2400 Fariview 8127-9129114
2750 Fairview 8127-9129114
2501 Placentia 812 7-912 911 4
140 112 E 17th 815-1012114
257 E 16th 7131-1011114
360 Ogle 8/4-1011114
195 112 Broadway 814-1016114
P Michael Griffin
Line Description: Settlement -618112 Injury Claim
P Newport Mesa Unified School District
Line Description: Joint Use Agreement Oct-Decl4
0183729 1 0/1 7/14 P Southern California Edison Company
Line Description: 1587 Sunflower 919-1018114
Signals 918-1017!14
782 Shalimar 919-10/8114
NCC 8/28-9/29114
Park Maint 9/8-1017114
Medians 7/9-8!1114
360 Ogle 911 1-1 011 011 4
3191 Red hiii 9110-10/9114
350 Bristol 9110-1019/14
St Lights 8129-9129114
2293 Canyon 918-1017114
567W 18th 918-1017114
3192 Redhill 9/9-10/8114
BCC 918-1017114
Remit ID
0000022969
0000003339
0000004088
Payment Amt
40, 000.00
47,074.62
102, 951.58
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 3
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
C cl
Payment Ref Date Status Remit To Remit ID Payment Amt
0163730 10/17/14 P Steadfast Contracting Inc 0000021584 19,873.06
Line Description.: Sales Tax (8.00%)
WiPi Installation Sr Center
0183731 10/17/14 P 1st Jon Inc 0000018321 244.20
Line Description: Porta Potty Svcs -Hamilton Comm
Sales Tax (8.00°/x)
Porta Potty Svcs-DelMarCommGar
Sales Tax (B.00%)
0183732 10/17114 P ARC 0000022726 454.55
Line Description: OCC Mater Pian
0183733 10/17114 P AT & T 0000001107 2,677.39
Line Description: Firewall Fire Sta0 914-10/3
City Internet Router 912014
Smallwood Park 916-1015114
Estancia Park 913-1012114
Broadband Modem 913-1 01211 4
RMATS Fire Sta#+`2 914-1013114
IT Network Firewall 913-1012
Outgoing Trunk Line 914-1013
PD Emergency Line 914-1013
Cable TV DSL Line 914-1013
DRC Alarm 9/4-1013/14
Cool Line for PD 9f7-1016/14
RMATS Fire Sta#1 917-10161'[4
TeWinkle Park 91711016114
IT Computer Room 91711016114
Firewall Fire Sta#2 914-1013
DID Trunk Line 914-1013114
Outgoing Trunk Line 914-1013
0183734 10/17/14 P AT & T 0000001107 259.19
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 4
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2.58:53 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Line Description Cool Line for PD 1 W-1116114
Cool Line for PD 10/7-1116114
0183735
10/17/14
P AT & T Mobility
Line Description: Rec Cell Phone Usage 8112-9111
0183736
10/17/14
P AY Nursery
Line Description: Plants 4 Joasnn Bike Trail
Plants 4 Joann Bike Trail
0183737
10/17/14
P Abraam Kelyan
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001447.002
0183738
10/17/14
P Agromin OC LLC
Line Description: Mulch 4 City Properties
Mulch 4 City Properties
0183739
10/17/14
P Alexis Taylor
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt42001469.002
0183740
10/17/14
P Allstar Fire Equipment Inc
Line Description: SCOTT SCBA Repair
Boots -Davis
Fire Helmets & Parts
0183741
10/17/14
P Angelina Alatorre
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001476.002
0183742
10/17/14
P Angie Thorpe
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001466.002
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000001107 640.66
0000001142 1,587.60
0000022979 139.00
0000021587 1,328.40
0000022982 45.00
0000000986 972.53
0000001470 590.00
0000019557 49.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 5
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
0183743
10/17/14
P Anthony Monteleone
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/14/14
0183744
10/17/14
P Ariel Supply Inc
Line Description: Toner Cartidges
0183745
10!17114
P Arrowhead
Line Description: Council Mtng Supplies -Sept 14
0183746
1007114
P AutoZone
Line Description- Shap Supplies
A1C Parts
Shop Supplies
0183747
10/17114
P Baker Party Rentals
Line Description: Equipmnt Rental 4 Health Fair
0183748
10/17/14
P Barracuda Networks Inc
Line Description: Firewall 300 Renewal
0183749
10/17/14
P Bee Busters Inc
Line Description: Bee Removal
Bee Removal
Bee Removal
0183750
10/17/14
P Bound Tree Medical LLC
Line Descnption: AED Infant Child Key
Cr 4 AED Parts Returned
AED Parts
Smart Pads
Remit ID
0000021339
0000006035
0000015023
1111IIIIII]DW i!
0000010629
0000022171
0000007572
[�UUUI�Tifi[e3rd.9
Payment Amt
56.00
139.32
47.31
311.16
575.72
699.00
430.00
924.66
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 6
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Dank: CIT Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Sales Tax (8.00%)
0183751
10/17/14
P C2 Reprographics
0000015512
15.00
Line Description: Reprographics Svs
Sr Cntr Bldg Floor Plan Copies
0183752
10/17/14
P CPRS
0000005095
225.00
Line Description: Mrbshp 15 -City 711114-6/30115
0183753
10/17/14
P CPS Electronics & Consulting
0000016267
6,150.00
Line Description. Software License - Sonicwall
Anti-Spyware License
0183754
10/17/14
P CSG Consultants Inc
0000001887
2,610.86
Line Descnption: Plan Check&Inspection-Aug14
0183755
10/17/14
P Catalina Shores HOA
0000022980
1,220.00
Line Description: Refun Planning Appl PA13-04
0183756
10/17/14
P Catlin Teng
0000022457
144.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001483.002
0183757
10/17/14
P Cecily Renteria
0000019127
109.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt42001478.002
0183758
10/17/14
P Central United Life Insurance Co
0000010626
148.10
Line Description. Cancer insurance Premium-Oct14
0183759
10/17/14
P Charles Lawrence
0000021336
140.00
Report ID: CCIVl2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 7
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
C cie:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Softball Umpire 1016-10Y14114
0183760
10/17/14
P Charlotte Graham
0000020481
61.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001440.002
0183761
10/17/14
P Cherie M Pittington
0000003641
61.92
Line Description: Cal NFNA Mtng 9!30/14
0183762
10/17/14
P Christine Christopher
0000002045
213.00
Line Description.- Refund Rec Receipt#2001485.002
Refund Rec Receipt#2001460.002
0183763
10117114
P Cindy Massaro
0000017276
134.00
Line Description- Refund Rec Receipt#2001439.002
0183764
10/17114
P Cindy Ramirez
0000021643
105.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt42001467.002
0183765
10/17114
P Coast Transmission
0000001704
787.00
Line Description: Transmission Repair -#535
0183766
10/17/14
P Commercial Cleaning Systems Inc
0000002353
295.00
Line Description: Custodial Svs@Soccer Tournmt
0183767
10/17/14
P Complete Landscape Care Inc
0000022976
900.00
Line Description: Bear St Pkwy Proj
Remove Shrub/Ground Cover
0183768
10/17/14
P Costa Mesa Auto Glass
0000010001
232.80
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 8
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Windshield -#775
0183769
10/17/14
P Costa Mesa High School Foundation
0000019566
5,000.00
Line Description: 2014 CMHS Fndtn Gala Spnsrshp
0183770
10/17/14
P Costa Mesa Historical Society
0000011266
32.40
Line Description: Historical Photo& Label
0183771
10117114
P Costa Mesa Lock & Key
O000001817
2,830.64
Line Description: Sr Cntr Door Lock
Sales Tax (8.00%)
Senior Center New Masterkey Sy
Duplicate Keys
Duplicate Keys
City Clerk's Door Repair
0183772
10/17/14
P County of Orange District Attys Office
00000034B5
4,157.10
Line Description: Money Seized-Narc Investigatn
0183773
10/17/14
P DF Polygraph
0000021328
1,000.00
Line Description: Polygraph Exam 9117114
0183774
10/17/14
P Data Ticket Inc
0000010929
580.00
Line Descnption: Refund Citation #P667611
Refund Citation #P667616
0183775
10/17/14
P Dennis Harris
0000002466
46.00
Line Description: Basketball Referee 90/13/14
0183776
10/17/14
P Diversified Waterscapes Inc
0000021248
1,103.00
Line Description: Cleaned 4 Valves@TW Lakes
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 9
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
500.00
0000022978
43.50
0183777
10/17/14
P Ecological Fertigation Inc
1,192.01
0000001899
Line Description: TW Bark Pk Fertigation=Sep 14
0183778
10/17/14
P Edwin Everett
Line Descnption: Clothing Allowance Reimb 14-15
0183779
10/17/14
P Emily Turner
Line Description: Refund Citation #CM 1140618042
0183780
10/17/14
P Endemic Environmental Services Inc
Line Description: Wetlands Habitat MntrngSep-Dec
0183781
10/17/14
P Ennis Paint Inc
Line Description: Crosswalk Yellow Traffic Paint
0183782
10/17/14
P Eric Chang
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001487.002
0183783
10/17/14
P Ewing irrigation Products
Line Description: Irrigation Supplies
Cr 4 Returned Items
Irrigation Supplies
Irrigation Supplies
Irrigation Supplies
Irrigation Supplies
Irrigation Supplies
Irrigation Supplies
Irrigation Supplies
Irrigation Supplies
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000021569
398.00
0000005981
500.00
0000022978
43.50
0000021277
4,875.00
0000022755
1,192.01
0000001899
250.00
0000005063
3,916.96
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No_ 10
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle- WAKLY
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0183784
10/17/14
P Expo Propane Inc
0000017819
1,135.75
Line Description: Propane 4 Corp Yard
Propane 4 Corp Yard
0183785
10/17/14
P Express Pipe & Supply Co Inc
0000010920
54.07
Line Description: Caps 4 Piping
Sink Side Spray
Side Sprayer
Plugs/Plug Wrench
Cr 4 Rtrn Side Spray
0183786
10/17/14
P FTOG Inc
0000021401
2,092.50
Line Description: Interim Buyer 9129-10110114
0183787
10/17/14
P Fed Ex Corp
0000002190
22.33
Line Description: Ground Deliveries
0183788
10/17114
P Ferguson Enterprises Inc
0000007785
25.59
Line Description: Plugs 4 Sr Cntr
0183789
10/17/14
P Frazee Paint & Wallcovering
0000002271
70.58
Line Description: Graffiti Supplies
Graffiti Supplies
0183790
10/17/14
P G & W Towing
0000002289
62.00
Line Description: Towing Svs-#728
0183791
10/17/14
P Gail Olson
0000022985
105.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001473.002
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 11
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CIN Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0183792
14/17/14
P Galls LLC
0600002297
1,779.92
Line Description: Duty Gears
Duty Gear
0183793
10/17/14
P Government Staffing Services Inc
0000022422
10,736.88
Line Description: Temp Svs=Prof Mgr 9122-10/5
Temp Svs-Mgnt Anlys 9122-1013
Temp Svs-Buyer 9122-10/3
0183794
10/17/14
P Governor's Office Emergency Services
0000022970
1,600.00
Line Description- Officer Safety & Field Tactics
Officer Safety & Field Tactics
0183795
10/17/14
P Granicus Inc
0000015382
4,650.00
Line Description: Web -Streaming Svs 1011-12131
Encoding Appliance 1 011-1 2131
0183796
10/17/14
P Hanks Electrical Supplies
0000002445
795.94
Line Description: Cr -4 Electrical Supplies Rind
Electrical Supplies
Lamps
Electrical Supplies
Electrical Supplies
0183797
10/17/14
P Harshad Patel
0000022983
250.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001477.002
0183798
10117114
P Heather J uelfs
0000022981
7600
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001468.002
0183799
10/17/14
P Hi Standard Automotive LLC
0000002521
12,540.19
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 12
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description- Emergency Equip Outftng-#717
Sales Tax (8.00%)
0183800
10/17/14
P Huntington Beach Honda
0000019158
430.92
Line Description: Helmet -Brunt
0183801
10/17/14
P Imperial Sprinkler Supply
0000021204
1,324.19
Line Description: Irrigation Supplies
irrigation Supplies
Yukon Ave Pkwy Proj
0183802
10/17/14
P Intelligent Products Inc
0000002670
4,980.00
Line Description: Mutt Mitts
Sales & use Tax Payable
Sales Tax (8.000%)
Shipping Fee
0183803
10/17/14
P Interstate Batteries of California Coast
0000002700
3,317.00
Line Description: Batteries
Shop Supplies
Batteries -9524
0183804
10/17/14
P Irvine Pipe & Supply Inc
0000002711
128.77
Line Description: Plumbing Supplies
Brass Fitting
0183805
10/17/14
P Irvine Ranch Water District
0000005112
1,109.44
Line Description: 261 Monte Vista 918-1018114
258 Brentwood 918-1018114
2603 Elden 919-1018114
0183806
10/17/14
P JD Lock & Key
0000005930
107.95
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 13
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY
Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Line Description: Shop Supplies
0183807
10/17114
P Jays Designated Operator Services
0000022328
Line Description: Designated Operator Svs-Sep 14
0183808
10/17/14
P Jocelyn Sicat
0000022984
Line Description: Officer Shur€ey Exp
Rfnd Subpoena Dep 001-00262361
Rfnd Subpoena Dep 001-0026775
0183809
10/17/14
P Juliean Hansen
0000022413
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001450.002
0183810
10/17114
P Kathy Anderson
0000018905
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001441.002
0183811
10/17114
P Kennedy Equipment Inc
0000005174
Line Description. Fileters
0183812
10/17/14
P Keystone Uniforms OC
0000022280
Line Description: Unforms-Maldonado
uniform -Gagne
Uniform -Davis
Uniform -Mantillas
Unfform-Wood
Safety Vest -Clements
Safety Vest -Torres
Safety Vest -Rimmer
Safety Vest-Hideman
Uniform -Davis
Uniform -Moore
Uniform-Natividad
UniformJohnson
Payment Amt
760.00
120.93
288.00
76.00
237.06
10,004.94
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 14
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
_Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit 1D
Payment Amt
Line Description: Uniform-Selinske
Uniform-Leffi n gwel I
Uniform-Lemus
Uniform -Bradbury
Uniform-Goodsir
Uniform -Maldonado
Uniform-Goedsir
Patch Change
0183814
10/17/14
P Larrys Building Materials
0000002912
794.88
Line Description: Bldg Mod Proj-HarborfVictoria
Bldg Mod Proj-HarborfVictoria
0183815
10/17/14
P Lawrence P Shield
0000017089
84.00
Line Description: Softball Umpire 1018114
0183815
10/17114
P Lisa Jeppe
0000022809
134.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001474.002
0183817
10/17/14
P Los Angeles Times
0000003000
304.19
Line Description: Legal Notices for Planning Div
0183818
10/17114
P Marc Kelly
0000021379
45.00
Line Description: Basketball Referee 10/13/14
0183819
10/17/14
P Mary Anne David
0000022771
139.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001484.002
0183820
10/17/14
P Mesa Smog
0000020735
83.50
Line Description: Smog lnspectien for Unit #775
Smog inspection for Unit#757
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 15
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY
Run Time 2:58:53 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
0183821
10117/14
P Mouse Graphics
0000001170
Line Description: Copies & Digitize FW Plars
0183822
10/17/14
P Noemi Salazar Garcia
0000022971
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001481.002
0183823
10/17/14
P Office Max Incorporated
0000020710
Line Description: Office Supplies -Bldg Safety
Office Supplies -Central Srvcs
Office Supplies -Fire Admin
Office Supplies-Dev Srvcs Admn
Office Supplies -Construct Mgmt
Office Supplies -CDA
Office Supplies -IT
Office Supplies -Transportation
Office Supplies -Recreation
Office Supplies-PublicSvcsAdmn
Office Supplies -PD Records
0183824
10/17/14
P Orange County Treasurer Tax Collector
0000003489
Line Description: Printing Charges Aug 2014
Printing Charges June 2014
Printing Charges Sept 2014
0183825
10/17/14
P PAPA Pesticide Applicators Professional
0000003546
Line Description: 2015 Mbrshp for Rohert Ryan
0183826
10/17/14
P Patricia Albarian
0000004779
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001482.002
0183827
10/17/14
P Pest Options Inc
0000021412
Payment Amt
6SKO .
69.00
2,398.92
13,318.69
45.00
71.00
750.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 16
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY
Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle: MUKLY
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0000013236
Line Description: Herbicide App @JackHammett SC
0000022758
Herbicide App @TeWinkie SC
0183828 10/17/14
P Praxair
Line Description: Industrial Acetylene 4 Fleet
0183829 10/17/14
P Quentin W McKenzie
Line Description: Basketball Referee 9115114
0183830 10/17/14
P RPW Services Inc
Line Description: Lan dscapeWeedCntrlSts Apr2014
LandscapeWeedCntrtPrks Apr2014
0183831 10/17/14
P Randstad Technologies LP
Line Description: Temp IT Support Staff7128-8131
0183832 10/17/14
P Renee Cano
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001284.002
Refund Rec Receipt 2001284.002
Refund Rec Receipt 2001287.002
Refund Rec Receipt 2001287.002
0183833 10/17/14
P Ricky Loya
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/8-1019114
0183834 10/17/14
P Rincon Truck Center
Line Description: Hub Caps
0183835 10/17/14
P Rochas Kitchen
Line Description: Food for 1013114 Roadshow
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000003672 16. B7
0000011175 69.00
0000012440 8,430.08
0000022571 4,940.00
0000022812 80.00
0000022490
168.00
0000013236
77.52
0000022758
464.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 17
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Sank_ CIN Run Time 2:58:53 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0183836
10/17/14
P Rodell R Fick
0000002425
525.00
Line Description: Hearing Offcr Svcs CodeEnf &PD
0183837
10/17/14
P Rosa Ramirez
0000022972
101.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001486.002
0183838
16/17/14
P SC Fuels
0000013839
1,751.78
Line Description: Diesel Fuel for Fire Sta#3
0183839
10117114
P Safeway Sign Co.
0000016310
4,642.23
Line Description: Application Tape
Sales Tax (8.00%)
Stop Signs for City Streets
Sheeting
0183840
10/17/14
P Sarta Ana College
0000003752
220.80
Line Description: Pre -Academy Trng 912-9112114
0183841
10/17/14
P Sara Boer
0000022973
84.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001480.002
0183842
10/17/14
P Scientia Consulting Group Inc
0000021410
3,440.00
Line Description: IT Consultant 9114-9/20114
0183843
10/17/14
P SimplexGrinnell LP
0000011336
420.00
Line Description. Fire Alarm Monitoring-SrCenter
0183844
10/17/14
P Soraya Julian
0000018089
84.00
Report ID: GGM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 18
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CIN Run Time 2:58:53 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
bate
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Notary Pubic Fees
0183845
10117/14
P Southern California Gas Company
0000004092
169.36
Line Description: Natural Gas Fuel -Sep 14
Natural Gas Fuel -Sept 14
0183846
10/17/14
P Sparkletts
0000015725
34.14
Line Description: Water Service for Finance
Water Service for Fire
0183847
10/17/14
P Spectraturf Inc
0000011615
978.75
Line Description: Angels Plygrnd Surface Repair
0183848
10/17/14
P Spiral Binding Company Inc
0000019265
605.27
Line Description: Saddle Stitch Stapier 4 Mailrm
0183849
10/97/14
P State of Caiifornia Dept of Justice
0000001534
2,058.00
Line Description: Fingerprint Apps for Sept 2014
0183850
10117114
P Steen Security Inc
0000015257
1,137.00
Line Description- SrCntr Bldg Alarm Installation
0183851
10/17/14
P Steve Clever
0000010800
84.00
Line Description: Softball Umpire 1019114
0183852
10/17/14
P Susan Saxe Clifford PHD
0000003932
450.00
Line Description: Psych Evaluation for PD
0183853
10/17/14
P Terri Duong
0000022974
115.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 19
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY
Run Time 2:58:53 PM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description. Refund Rec Receipt 2001479.002
0183854
10/17/14
P The Home Depot Credit Services
0000002560
4,112.17
Line Description: Misc Purchases for Sept 2014
0183855
10/17/14
P The Rules Guys LLC
0000002952
1,290.00
Line Description: Annua6oftwareMaintJan-Dec2014
0183856
10/17/14
P Theodore Robins Ford
0000004245
1,843.37
Line Description: Axle Parts for Unit#710
Panel & Clip for Unit#509
ABS Control for Unit#211
Bearings, Gears for Unit#718
0183857
10/17/14
P Thomas E Gazsi
0000002314
62.99
Line Description: 9116114 Lunch Mtg
Parking for Deposition on 8122
0183858
10/17/14
P Time Warner Cab le
0000011202
1,195.00
Line Description: Internet Services 10117-11 1-t 6
0183859
10/17/14
P Traveltech Enterprises
0000022894
1,500.00
Line Description: SrCntr Travel-10122114Pechanga
0183860
10/17/14
P US Bank
0000002228
7,418.50
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1420
Payroll Deduction Check 1419
0183861
10/17/14
P US Postmaster
0000004377
10,000.00
Line Description: Standard Mail Fee
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 20
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Oct 16,2014
Bank. CITY Run Time 2:58:53 PM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
140.00
0000004425
553.34
0183862
10/17/14
P United Rotary Brush Corp
Line Description: Street Sweeper Brooms
0183863
10/17/14
P Vic Duong
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/13-10t14/14
0183864
10/17/14
P Village Nurseries
Line Description: Plants 4 VictcrialPuente
0183865
10/17/14
P Vulcan Materials Company
Line Description: Asphalt for Patching Potholes
Asphalt for Patching Potholes
Asphalt for Patching Potholes
Asphalt for Patching Potholes
0183866
10/17/14
P Waxie Sanitary Supply
Line Description: Sr Center Janitorial Supplies
0183857
10/17114
P Westminster Press Inc
Line Description- City Wide Charter Mailing
Print Svcs-Rec Guide Sep-Dec14
0183868
10/17/14
P Westrux International Inc
Line Description: Engine Noise Repair -Unit #555
0183869
10/17/14
P William Villard
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001472.002
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000003525
259.80
0000011215
140.00
0000004425
553.34
0000007403
295.87
0000004480 789.87
0000008519 12,827.69
0000004533 121.00
0000022975 139.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 21
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Ron Date Oct 16,2014
Bank: CITY Ron Time 2:58.53 PM
cycle:
Payment Ret Date
0183870 10/17/14
Status Remit To
P Williams Data Management
Line Description: IT Data Storage for Aug 2014
IT Data Storage for Sept 2014
End of Report
Remit ID
UUUUUj[Y:UIc]
Payment Amt
720.0 D
TOTAL $905,164.44
Report ID: CCM2001 O City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
CCM OVERFLOW CHECK LISTING Run Date Oct 18,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:58:28 PM
Cycle-'
Payment Ref
Date
Status
Remit To
0183728
10/17/14
O
Mesa Consolidated Water District
0183813 10/17/14 O
Line Description: Overflow
Keystone Uniforms OC
Line Description. Overflow
End of Report
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000003144 0.00
0000022280 0.00
TOTAL 0.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: COMI Run Time 10:15:01 AM
Cycle: ACQ 4W
Payment Ref Date
000630 11/07/14
Status Remit To
P Versatile information Products Inc
Line Description: Software Srvc Rnwl 711114-6130
Digital Audio Recorders
Sales Tax (8.00°/x)
Shipping Fee
0
Remit ID
0000013255
End of Report
Payment Amt
6,386.89
TOTAL $6,386.89
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: DDP1 Run Time 11:53:52 AM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit 1D
Payment Amt
003166
11/07/14
P Costa Mesa Employees Association
0000006284
4,314.91
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
003167
11/07/14
P Costa Mesa Executive Club
0000006286
200.00
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
003168
11/07/14
P Costa Mesa Firefighters Association
0000001812
5,478.40
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
003169
11/07/14
P Costa Mesa Police Association
0000001819
5,820.00
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
003170
11/07/14
P Costa Mesa Police Management Assn
0000005082
150.00
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
TOTAL $15,963.31
End of Report
ReportID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Sank: CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle: IMAIKLY
Payment Ref Date Status Remit To Remit ID Payment Amt
0184195 11107!14 P Black Rock Construction Company 0000003627 141,979.40
Line Description: Alley Rehabilitation City Proj
Retentions Payable Proj #14-06
0184196 11/07/14 P Lilley Planning Group 0000021428 28,770.00
Line Description: Piannfng Consultant Svcs912014
0184197 11/07/14 P Mesa Consolidated Water District 0000003144 23,462.68
Line Description: 1000 Victoria 8126-10128114
900 Victoria 8126-10128/14
2229 Fairview 8121-10/24114
1400 Sunflower 9129-10129114
640 Victoria 8/25-10127114
2150 Maple 8125-10127114
3202 Harbor 9129-10129114
3581 Harbor 9129-10/29114
2800 Bear 9/29-10129
3333 Bear 9/29-10129/14
3333 Bear 9129-10129114
970 Arlington 9129-10129114
970 Arlington 9129-10129114
2,901 Placentia 9/29-10/29114
2150 Maple 8125-10127114
2229 Newport 912 9-1 012 911 4
2600 Fairview 9129-10129114
2400 Fairview 9129--10129114
2750 Fairview 9129-10/29114
2621 112 Harbor 9129-10129114
500 Victoria 8125-10127114
2161 112 Raieigh 8125-10127114
111 Fair 9129-10129/14
0184199 11/07/14 P OC Plumbing 0000017483 20,262.05
Line Description: Waterless Urinal Replacement
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 2
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle: AWKLY
Payment Ret
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0184200
11/07/14
P PTM General Engineering Services Inc
0000020179
22,182.50
Line Description: City Proj No 13-13 Traffic Sig
Retentions Payable Proj #13-13
018420'
1//07114
P Patriot Paving Inc
0000022732
176,705.70
Line Descripfion: City Project No 14--05 Alley R
Retentions Payable Proj #14-05
0184202
11/07/14
P SC Fuels
0000013839
16,647.25
Line Description: Unleaded Fuel for PD
0184203
11/07/14
P AFLAC
0000012253
9,542.94
Line Description: Cancer Premium -Oct 2014
STD Premium -Oct 2014
0184204
11/07/14
P AT & T
0000001107
608.68
Line Description: PD DSL Line 9127-10126114
PD Payphone 9128-10127/14
Contract Srvcs 9128-10127114
RMATS FireSta#6 9122-10/21/14
WSS Alarm 9127-10/26114
SrCntr DSL 4 BldgMaint Use9124
RMATS NCC Complex9124-10/23114
LionsPk BaseballFid 9124-10123
SrCntr DSL 4 BldgMaint Use9/24
Firewall Fire Sta#4 9127-10126
Firewall Fire Sta#6 9127-10126
PD DSL 4 IT Staff 9128-10/27
0184205
11/07/14
P Above It All Drywall
0000021804
1,250.00
Line Description: Sr Cntr Dry Wall Repair
Corp Yard Patch Work
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 3
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
cie: WXKLY
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
0184206
11/07/14
P Ana Mondragon
0000023018
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001520.002
0184207
11/07/14
P Anthony Monteleone
0000021339
Line Description: Softbali Umpire 1 012 8-1 013 011 4
0184208
11/07/14
P AutoZone
0000019364
Line Description: Lg Drip Trays
0184209
11/07/14
P Barbara Bandes
0000023020
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001526.002
0184210
11107/14
P Barbara Zwart
0000022936
Line Description: Intermediate Code Enforcement
0184211
11/07/14
P Best Best & Krieger LLP
0000014491
Line Description: Special Council Legal Svs-9130
Legal Svs-Election Work 9130
0184212
11/07/14
P Bound Tree Medical LLC
0000011695
Line Description: Paramedic Supplies
0184213
11/07/14
P Byron de Arakal
0000012401
Line Description: Park&Rec Comm Mtng-Oct 14
0184214
11/07/14
P CAPF
0000004755
Line Description: Firefighter LTD -Nov 2014
0184215
11/07/14
P CLEA
0000004754
Payment Amt
250.00
156.00
62.79
200.00
119.00
5,479.70
1,909.92
100.00
1,404.00
2,401.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 4
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Police Officers LTD -Nov 2014
0184216
11/07/14
P CNC Engineering Inc
0000008798
202.50
Line Description: Habor/Adam lmpry-Jul 14
0184217
11/07/14
P CSG Consultants Inc
0000001887
2,750.00
Line Description: Bldng Inspcetion Svs 8130-9126
0184218
11/07/14
P Carol Keller
0000022510
100.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001525.002
0184219
11/07/14
P Chandlers Air Conditioning &
0000001640
1,485.04
Line Description: SR Cntr Reach In Replaced
DRC Freezer Maint July -Sept 14
Equipment Repair@Property
0184220
11/07/14
P Charles Lawrence
0000021336
156.00
Line Description: Softball Umpire 1012-10128/14
0184221
11107114
P Cindy Ramirez
0000021643
30.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001523.002
0184222
11/07/14
P Clara Sherman
0000023021
5.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001529.002
01B4223
11/07/14
P Colin K McCarthy
0000020464
400.00
Line Description: Planning Comm Mtng-Oct 2014
0184224
11/07/14
P Copp Contracting Inc
0000015151
6,787.27
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 5
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Ren Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle:
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
Line Description: City Project No 14 -03 -Wallace
Retentions Payable Proj #14-03
0184225 11/07/14
P Costa Mesa Lock & Key
Line Description: Rekey 5th FI Restroom Lock
New Lockset 4 Sr Cntr
Sales Tax (8.00%)
Replace Worn Cylinder @ NCC
New Flectronic Lock Council Ch
0184226 11/07/14
P Cron & Associates Transcription Inc
Line Description: Transcribing Svs-PSU
0184227 11/07/14
P Crop Production Services Inc
Line Description: Chemical 4 TW Lakes
Seed & Top Dressing 4 Pards
0184228 11/07/14
P DF Polygraph
Line Description: Polygraph Exam 1017-10/9114
0184229 11/07/14
P David Volz Design
Line Description: Dei Mar Median -9130114
0184230 11/07/14
P Dean Abernathy
Line Description: Park&Rec Comm Mtng-Oct 14
0184231 11/07/14
P Delta Dental Insurance Co
Line Description: Dental HMO Permium-Nov 14
0184232 11/07/14
P Direct Edge Inc
Line Description: Rototiller Parts
Remit 1D
0000001817
0000016871
0000020562
0000021328
0000004828
0000021303
0000001966
0000001998
Payment Amt
1, 905.44
412.25
884.41
1,000.00
911.26
100.00
2,978.46
385.69
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 6
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Sank: CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
C cle: AiAfKLY
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Tine Set -#120
0184233
11/07/14
P Donald Harper
0000021694
100.00
Line Description: Park&Rec Comm Mtng-Oct 14
0184234
11/07/14
P Employment Development Department
0000001543
11,103.00
Line Description: Unemployment 71l-9/30114
0184235
11/07/14
P Ewing Irrigation Products
0000005063
1,237.93
Line Description: Irrigation Supplies
Tools
Irrigation Supplies
Irrigation Supplies
0184236
11/07/14
P Fatpot Technologies LLC
0000003034
14,995.89
Line Description: FATPOT Maint 711114-6130/15
0184237
11107/14
P G & K Services Inc
0000005132
1,380.77
Line Description: Supplies-DRCINCC
Uniforms -St Swpn
Uniforms/Supplies FS #1-6
Uniforms/Supplies-Parks
Uniforms/Supplies-Fleet
U n ifc rms-Streets
Uniforms -Fac
Supplies -Telecomm
0184238
11/07/14
P GE Capital
0000021378
604.68
Line Description: Copier Lease 10123-11122!14
Color Copier Rnf111116-12/15
0184239
11/07/14
P GIT Satellite LLC
0000019742
57.46
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 7
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle--
Payment Ret
Date
Status Remit To
Line Description: Satellite Phone 912 0-1 011 911 4
0184240
11/07/14
P Glenns Alignment & Brake Service
Line Description: Alignment & Repair -#109
0184241
11/07/14
P Government Finance Officers Association
Line Description: 15 Mbrshp-King
2015 Mbrshp-Dun€vent
2015 Mbrshp-ODonoghuelTsao
0184242
11/07/14
P Gray Manufacturing Company Inc
Line Description: Jack Stands
0184243
11107/14
P Hexis USA LLC
Line Description: Sign Face Materials
0184244
11/07/14
P Hi Standard Automotive LLC
Line Description: Emergency Equipment Outfitting
Sales Tax (8.00%)
0184245
11/07/14
P Imperial Sprinkler Supply
Line Description: Irrigation Supplies
O'84246
11/07/14
P Interstate Batteries of California Coast
Line Description: Credits 4 Cores
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
0184247
11/07/14
P James M Fitzpatrick
Line Description: Planning Comm Mtng-Oct 2014
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000002344 1,879.80
0000002388 840.00
0000018177 413.64
0000012721 151.10
0000002521 12,540.19
0000021204 265.06
0000002700 621.80
0000001002 400.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 8
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 41:52:59 AM
Cycle.
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0184248
11/07/14
P Jeff R Mathews
0000020470
400.00
Line Description: Planning Comm Mtng-Oct 2014
0184249
11/07/14
P John Heunemann
0000015992
200.00
Line Description: Paramedic License Re -Cert
0184250
11/07/14
P Karen Bozinovski
0000023019
139.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001521.002
0184251
11/07/14
P Kelly Paper
0000014703
987.13
Line Description: Paper 4 Printing
Paper 4 Printing
Paper 4 Printing
0184252
11/07/14
P Kevin Diamond
0000001989
795.00
Line Description: Global Terrorism 913-11112114
Global Terrorism 9/3-11112114
0184253
11/07/14
P Keystone Uniforms OC
0000022280
5,038.42
Line Description: Uniform -Glasgow
Unfirom-Hernandez
Uniform=Guth
Uniform -Williams
Uniform -Thomas
Uniform -Goodfellow
Uniform -Cover
Uniform-Blincoe
Uniform -La Placa
Uniform-Melgoza
0184254
11/07/14
P Khanh Nguyen
0000015037
99.53
Report Id: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 9
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY
Run Time 19:52:59 AM
C cle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: ICCOE Mtngs Mileage Reimb
0184255
11/07/14
P Kim Pederson
0000010099
104.00
Line Description: Park&Rec Comm Mtng-Oct 14
0184256
11/07/14
P Kimball Midwest
00000061319
1,448.63
Line Description: Drill Set, Saw
0184257
11/07114
P LN Curtis & Sons
0000002983
156.70
Line Description: K Tool for Fire
4184258
11/07114
P Lawrence P Shield
0000017089
130.00
Line Description- Softball Umpire 10126-10129/14
4184259
11/07/14
P Leica Geosystems Inc
0000003452
172.96
Line Description: Labor/Supplies for Engineering
0184264
11/07/14
P Los Angeles Times
0000003000
183.51
Line Description: Legal Notices for Planning Div
Legal Notices for Planning Div
0184261
11/07/14
P Mar Vac Electronics Corporation
0000003049
27.68
Line Description: 12 Volt Battery for Panel
Supplies for Fleet Services
0184262
11/07/14
P Marc Kelly
0000421379
46.40
Line Description: Basketball Referee 10/213/14
0184263
11/07/14
P Michael S Carrillo
0000023014
47.134
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 10
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank. CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle:
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0000003337
Line Description: Subpoena Dep Rfnd 001-00263396
0184264 11/07/14
P Municipal Emergency Services Inc
Line Description: Nomax IIIA Pant
Sales Tax (8.00%)
Shipping Charges
0184265 11/07114
P NDS Copier & Printer Services
Line Description: Clean & Service Printers
0184266 11/07/14
P Newport Harbor Locksmith
Line Description: Spare Key for Fleet Services
0184267 11/07/14
P Noack Trophy & Engraving Company
Line Description: Plate 4 Grand Opening CMHS
0184268 11/07/14
P Norma Watson
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001530.002
0184269 11/07/14
P Office Max Incorporated
Line Description: Office Supplies -Bldg Safety
Office Supplies -CEO
Office Supplies -GDA
Office Supplies-Dev Svcs Admin
Office Supplies -Fire Admin
Office Supplies-Maint Srvcs
Office Supplies -PD Field Ops
Office Supplies -Tress Mgmt
Office Supplies -PD Records
Office Supplies -PD Prop&Evid
Office Supplies -PD Investigtns
Office Supplies -NCC
Office Supplies -IT
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000021524 10,988.78
0000022895
696.84
0000003337
6.16
0000003360
27.00
0000023022 5.00
0000020710 3,288.79
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No, 11
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY
Run Time 11:52:59 AM
C cie:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Line Description: Office Supplies -Engineering
0184270
11/07/14
P Onward Engineering
0000003212
Line Description: Placentia Ave. Median Design 5
Construction Mgmt & Inspection
0184271
11/07/14
P Orarge County Council on Aging
0000003431
Line Description: CDBG 1st Qtr 2014-15 Grant
0184272
11/07/14
P Phoebe Jin
0000023026
Line Description: Mileage Reimb-ECS Annual Conf
0184273
11/07/14
P Porterfield Enterprises LTD
0000003662
Line Description: Brake Pads 4 Fleet Services
0184274
11/07/14
P Pro Photo Connection Inc
0000003689
Line Description: Digital Light Jet & Lab Svc -PD
0184275
11/07/14
P Quentin W McKenzie
0000011175
Line Description: Basketball Referee 10/29/14
0184276
11/07/14
P RSCCD/Santa Ana College
0000003752
Line Description: Wellness Class RegistrationFee
0184277
11/07/14
P Rand Foster
0000010791
Line Description: Softball Umpire 9115-9129114
Softball Umpire 1016-10127114
0184278
11/07/14
P Redemption Church
0000004874
Payment Amt
7,260.00
2,250.00
50.57
51.42
324.01
46.00
6,860.00
546.00
820.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 12
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001527.002
Refund Rec Receipt 2001528.002
0184279
11/07/14
P Republic Engines
Line Descnption: Light Tower Parts
0184280
11107!14
P Ricky Loya
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/29-1112114
0184281
11/07/14
P Rincon Truck Center Inc
Line Description: Gauge Sender
Fan Belt
0184282
11/07/14
P Robert E Graham
Line Description: Park&Rec Comm Mtng-Oct 2014
0184283
11/07/14
P Robert Fields
Line Description: Piano/Vccals 11/21/14 4 SrCntr
0184284
11/07114
P Robert L Dickson Jr
Line Description: Planning Comm Mtg-Oct 2014
0184285
11/07/14
P Rockey Murata Landscape
Line Description: Irrigation Repairs at FDC
Install Solenoid Valves @ FW
Irrigation Repairs at Yukon
0184286
11/07/14
P Sally Kim
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt 2001524.002
Remit ID Payment Amt
0000003792 1.505.39
0000022490 156.00
0000013236 107.73
0000014777 100.00
0000023013 100.00
0000002671 400.00
0000021496 644.20
0000023017 100.00
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No, 13
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle:
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0184287 11/07/14
P Simon Quintana
Line Description_ Refund Rec Receipt 2001522.002
0184288 11/07/14
P Smart & Final
Line Description: FS#1 Kitchen & Admin Supplies
Fire Admin Meeting Supplies
0184289 11/07/14
P Southern California Fdison Company
Line Description: 702 112 Victoria 9/30-10130114
3460 Smalley 1011 -10131/14
Sr Cntr 9129-10129/14
348 E 17th 9125-10127114
3351 Sakioka 9125-10127/14
3349 Sakioka 9125-10127/14
Davis Field 9129-10129114
NCC 912 9-1 012 911 4
1624 Gisler 1011-10131/14
DRC 913 0-1 013 011 4
702 Victoria 9/30-10/30114
3129 Harbor 10/1 -10131114
0184290 11/07/14
P Southern California Gas Company
Line Description: FS #6 9129-10127114
BCC 9125-10/23114
Telecomm W23-10/21/14
PD 9123-10121114
FS #5 9123-10121114
FS #1 9125-10123114
0184291 11/07/14
P Stancil Corporation
Line Description: Stancil Recording Upgrade
0184292 11/07/14
P State of California Dept of General Svcs
Remit ID
0000023016
0000004044
0000004088
0000004092
0000021230
0000001532
Payment Amt
45.00
102.12
10,213.27
937.07
1,750.00
091vil
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 14
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
Line Description: Disability Retirement Appeal
0184293
11/07/14
P Steadfast Contracting Inc
0000021584
2,238.35
Line Description: Install Data Drops -Police Dept
0184294
11/07/14
P Sieve Clever
0000010800
156.00
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10129-10130114
0184295
11/07/14
P Straps Unlimited
0000019773
265.68
Line Description. Swift Water Bags for Fire Dept
0184296
11/07/14
P Suanne I Honey
0000013012
47.83
Line Description: Subpoena Dep Rfnd 001-00262987
0184297
11/07/14
P Susan Kerneil
0000023015
31.00
Line Description: Refund Rec Receipt#2001518.002
0184298
11/07/14
P The Bank of New York Mellon
0000005664
2,182.20
Line Description: Admin Fee -2003 COP Oct14-Sep15
0184299
11/07/14
P Theodore Robins Ford
0000004245
644.60
Line Description: Fan Motor & Relay for Unit#752
Handle
Seat Belt & Pin
0184300
11/07/14
P Timothy W Sesler
0000021628
400.00
Line Description: Planning Comm Mtg-Oct 2014
0184301
11/07/14
P US Postal Service
0000004376
685.00
Report ID. CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 15
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY
Run Time 11:52:59 AM
Cycle:
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit tD
Line Description: BRM Annual Maint
0184302
11/07/14
P United Rotary Hrush Corp
0000003525
Line Description: Street Sweeper Brooms
0184303
11/07/14
P Valley Power Systems Inc
0000014061
Line Description: Intake Elbow
0184304
11/07/14
P ValueOptions of California Inc
0000020327
Line Description: EAP Services for October 2014
0184305
11107114
P Vic Duong
0000011215
Line Description: Softball Umpire 1 012 7-1 012 811 4
0184306
11/07/14
P Vulcan Materials Company
0000007403
Line Description: Asphalt for Patching Potholes
Asphalt for Patching Potholes
0184307
11/07/14
P Wayne Ritchie
0000022963
Line Description: Softball Umpire 10/30114
0184308
11/07/14
P West Coast Fence Co
0000021495
Line Description: Fence Install 4 Chemical Room
0184309
11/07/14
P William M Moss
0000003241
Line Description: Paramedic License Renewal
0184310
11/07/14
P Womens Transitional Living Center Inc
0000022934
Line Description: CD13G Grant - Subrecipient Ag re
Payment Amt
346.40
51.88
694.26
130.00
145.48
78.00
970.00
200.00
2,507.91
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 16
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY
Run Time 17:52:59 AM
C cl
Payment Ref Date
Status Remit To
0184311 11/07/f4 P Xpedx
Line Description: Paper for Color Copying
End of Report
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0000006067 610.41
TOTAL $592,420.25
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGfSTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 11:54:35 AM
Cycle'
Payment Ref
Date
Status Remit To
Remit ID
Payment Amt
0184312
11/07/14
P CalPERS Long -Term Care Program
0000006287
169.40
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
0184313
11!07114
P Carrie Beatteay
0000023012
369.24
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
0184314
11/07/14
P Community Health Charities
0000008015
10.00
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
0184315
11/07/14
P Rabin Stafford
0000021522
804.42
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
0184316
11/07/14
P State of California
0000001546
185.00
Line Description: Payroll Deduction. Check 1423
0184317
11/07/14
P Tamra Williams
0000002941
1,350.92
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
0184318
11/07/14
P Treasurer of Virginia
0000014648
263.50
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
0184319
11/07/14
P United States Treasury
0000015556
85.38
Line Description: Payroll Deduction Check 1423
TOTAL $3,257.86
End of Report
Report ID: CCM2001 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No_ 1
SUMMARY CHECK REGISTER Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 2:26:43 PM
Cycle: 01 1ICK0
Payment Ref Date
0184320 11/06/14
Status Remit To
P US Bank
Line Description: Misc ProcurementCard Purchases
End of Report
Remit ID
0000002228
Payment Amt
27.992.33
TOTAL $27,992.33
Report ID: CCM20010 City of Costa Mesa Accounts Payable Page No. 1
CCM OVERFLOW CHECK LISTING Run Date Nov 06,2014
Bank: CITY Run Time 11:53:17 AM
C cle:
Payment Ref Date Status Remit To Remit ID Payment Amt
0184188 11/07/14 O Mesa Consolidated Water District 0000003144 0.00
Line Description: Overflow
TOTAL 0.00
End of Report
Cl T Y COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: CC -4
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF MEDIANS AND
ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN
DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2014
FROM: PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
PRESENTATION BY: ERNESTO MUNOZ, PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FARIBA FAZELI, CITY ENGINEER, (714) 754-5335
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Award a contract to Asakura Robinson Company, 445 Santa Ana Avenue, Newport Beach,
California 92663, in an amount not to exceed $68,350 for design services, and authorize the
Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services Agreement (Attachment 1).
BACKGROUND:
In the Fiscal Year 2014-2015, the City Council allocated funding for the removal of turf and
installation of water efficient landscape on the existing medians within the following streets:
1. Mesa Verde Drive (east and west) from Adams Avenue to Adams Avenue.
2. California Street at New Hampshire Avenue.
In addition, the City requested the design and construction of new parkway landscaping on the
north side of Gisler Avenue from Iowa Street to California Street, and a unique Entry Monument
sign at Newport Boulevard and Industrial Way.
ANALYSIS:
The design scope of work for this project consists of addressing planning, environmental, and
design issues pertaining to the preparation of final plans, specifications, and construction cost
estimates for the design and installation of an up lighted Entry Monument sign at Industrial Way
and Newport Boulevard, re -landscaping of existing medians by removing water intensive, high
maintenance turf and replacing it with drought tolerant, water efficient, and low maintenance
plant materials; including installation of new water efficient irrigation systems on Mesa Verde
Drive and California Street and the new landscaping area within the existing parkway along the
north side of Gisler Avenue.
The required design services for the project are extensive and beyond staff's resources at this
time. Staff advertised the project for the design phase on July 24, 2014 and received four
proposals on August 15, 2014. All proposals were reviewed for compliance with the City's
Request For Proposals (RFP's), and the consultants were evaluated based on project
understanding, depth of experience, technical expertise, ability to meet the schedule, and
associated factors.
After careful review of all proposals, staff has selected Asakura Robinson Company as well
qualified to perform the work. The firm's Project Manager exhibited a thorough understanding
of the project scope, and has demonstrated to have the technical ability and expertise with
similar projects their firm has completed. Staff has determined the proposed cost for consultant
services to be reasonable for meeting the City's requirements as listed in the Scope of
Services.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
The alternative to this Council action would be to not award a design services contract for the
stated project, and perform the engineering work with City staff. Due to the volume of work and
the large number of projects currently being handled by the Engineering Division, a significant
delay in implementing this project would be experienced if staff were to perform the engineering
in-house. Delays are estimated to be from twelve to fifteen months.
FISCAL REVIEW:
The Fiscal Year 2013-2014, Capital Improvement budget includes $693,900 in Capital
Improvement funds for these median and parkway improvements. These budgeted funds are
sufficient for the design and construction costs for the subject project.
LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the attached Professional Services Agreement
(Attachment 1) as to content and form.
CONCLUSION:
Staff completed the evaluation of the RFP's submitted for design services for the Medians,
Parkway, and Entry Monument Sign improvements. It is recommended that the City Council
award the design services contract to Asakura Robinson Company, in an amount not to exceed
$68,350 and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services
Agreement.
ERNESTO MUNOZ,
Public Services Director
Attachments: 1-
2-
FARIBA FAZELI
City Engineer
Professional Services Agreement
Location Maps
Distribution: Chief Executive Officer
Assistant CEO
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Clerk
Staff
File
F
CC -5
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COSTA MESA CITY COUNCIL, AND
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DECEMBER 3, 2013
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the Mayor at 4:40 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Costa
Mesa City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, California.
ROLL CALL
Council Members Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council Member
Leece, and Council Member Genis (arrived at 4:41 p.m.)
Council Members Absent: Council Member Monahan
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS - NONE
SPECIAL CLOSED SESSION
The City Council recessed into closed session at 4:40 p.m. to consider the following items:
1. Conference with Thomas R. Hatch, Chief Executive Officer, and Labor Negotiator, Agency
Negotiator regarding Employee Organization: Costa Mesa City Employee Association
(CMCEA), pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6.
The City Council ended Closed Session at 5:05 p.m,
The City Council reconvened at 6:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER (00:00:10)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (00:00:29) -- Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
MOMENT OF SOLEMN EXPRESSION (00:00:50)
Pastor Mike Gibson, Christ Lutheran Church
ROLL CALL (00:02:55)
Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council Member Leece, Council
Member Genis, and Council Member Monahan.
Absent: None
Officials Present: Chief Executive Officer Thomas R. Hatch, City Attorney Thomas Duarte,
Assistant Chief Executive Officer Rick Francis, Economic and Development Services Director
Gary Armstrong, Public Services Director Ernesto Munoz, and City Clerk Brenda Green.
CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT - NONE
• COIN: Ex Parte Communications pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2-238 (b) - None
Minutes --- Regular Meeting --- December 3, 2013 - Page 1
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
ANNOUNCEMENTS (00:03:09)
"Costa Mesa Minute" was played featuring upcoming events and activities in the community.
PRESENTATIONS (00:05:20)
Jennifer Knapp, President, Estancia and Tewinkle Schools Foundation provided an update on
educational advancement for Costa Mesa students. (00:05:23)
Sergeant Vic Bakkila presented Chief Gazsi with an award for his support of the Guards and
Reserves in the Police Department. (00:09:35)
The City Council recognized Costa Mesa High School Football Team for winning the "Battle of
the Bell." (00:15:15)
PUBLIC COMMENTS (00:31:35)
Discussion ensued among City Council Members on the change of Order of Business and the
number of public. comment speakers. (00:31:44)
MOTION: To continue to operate under existing adopted Resolution No. 12-21 regarding Order
of Business until a new Resolution is adopted. (00:35:12)
MOTION/SECOND. Council Member Genis/Council Member Leece
Motion failed by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis and Council Member Leece
Noes: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Council Member Monahan
The motion failed 2-3
Cynthia McDonald, Costa Mesa, spoke on civility and public discourse. (00:38:59)
Howard Hull, Costa Mesa, spoke on the City budget and City improvements. (00:42:13)
James Bridges, Costa Mesa, spoke on Closed Session meetings; and public comments period.
(00:44:03)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on the change of Order of Business. (00:46:14)
Eleanor Egan, Costa Mesa, spoke on public comments. (00:49:37)
Sue Lester, Costa Mesa, welcomed new Fire Chief Dan Stefano; thanked Chief Gazsi; spoke on
adopting military officers for the holidays; and employee's retiring. (00:51:02)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, spoke on warrants; contract attorneys; and playbooks. (00:54:11)
Terry Koken, Costa Mesa, spoke on the cannon at the police substation; and sang a song.
(00:57:37)
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, spoke on decorum at Council. meetings. (00:59:55)
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- December 3, 2013 - Page 2
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Dan Goldmann, Costa Mesa, spoke on the Fairview Park path removal. (01:02:56)
COUNCIL MEMBERS' REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS (01:04:30)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger welcomed new Fire Chief Stefano; thanked Chief Arnold; and invited
the public to contact him to discuss any issues. (01:04:34)
Council Member Genis welcomed new Fire Chief Stefano; spoke on attending the Southern
California Economic Summit and a long-term economic strategy; announced a bird hike at
Fairview Park on December 7; spoke on long term uses of Fairview Park; and wished Helen
Nenadal well on her retirement. (01:05:43)
Council Member Leece spoke regarding public comments; change in the Order of Business;
City spending; Fairview Park; inquired on the placement of items on the consent calendar;
spoke on hate crimes in Costa Mesa; requested updates on AB109 realignment of parolees and
60th Anniversary reports; spoke on sponsorships; wished retirees well; spoke on a letter from
Gilbert Collins regarding Fairview Park; and wished everyone a Merry Christmas. (01:08:56)
Council Member Monahan spoke on sports field lighting data; the Consent Calendar; the 60th
Anniversary investigation; paths at Fairview Park; City sponsorships; welcomed new Fire Chief
Stefano; and congratulated various sports teams. (01:16:03)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on the new "Preserve Our Neighborhoods" Task Force; group homes;
toll roads and the 1-405 issue; and wished Helen Nenadal well on her retirement. (01:20.13)
REPORT -CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) (01:27:00)
CEO Hatch spoke on the 1-405 toll road issues; coyote issue; presented a video on the Police
Department's 60th Anniversary event; welcomed new Fire Chief Dan Stefano; announced
upcoming Study Sessions on Supportive Housing, the General Plan update and Land Use
Alternatives; welcomed Jerry Guarracino who will be assisting the Planning Department;
congratulated employees on their retirement; spoke on the removal of the decomposed granite
path at Fairview Park; addressed the question on the placement of items on the Consent
Calendar; and AB 109 realignment of parolees. (01:27:03)
CONSENT CALENDAR (01:34:35)
MOTION: Approve recommended actions for Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 through 14 except
for Items 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14.
MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro
Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
Minutes -- Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 3
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
1. PROCEDURAL WAIVER: MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE ONLY OF
ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
THAT APPEAR ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND
FURTHER READING WAIVED
ACTION: City Council waived reading in full of Ordinances and Resolutions and approval
and adoption of same by reading title only.
2. READING FOLDER
a. Claims received by the City Clerk: Paul Bass; and Roy Rodgers.
b. Requests for Alcohol Beverage Control licenses:
• For MP Enterprises Inc., dba Mama Hong's, at 3013 Harbor Boulevard, an Original
State Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License Type "41" (On -Sale Beer and
Wine, Eating Place).
• For Serenity Beach Investments Inc., dba Globe European Delicatessen, at 1928
Harbor Boulevard, an Original State Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License
Type "41" (On -Sale Beer and Wine, Eating Place),
ACTION: Received and filed
7. BRENTWOOD PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 13-14
ACTION: City Council rejected all bids and approved to re -advertise the project.
PUBLIC HEARINGS (01:35:50)
1. AMENDMENT TO 2005 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES: "A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT
TO THE CITY'S 2005 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES". (01:36:05)
Minoo Ashabi, Senior Planner, presented the report on the amendment to the City's 2005
residential design guidelines. (01:36:28)
Council Member Monahan thanked staff for their excellent work; and spoke on structure
walls. (01:42:03)
Discussion ensued regarding ratios; setbacks; project deviations; site coverage; massing;
and the zoning code. (01:42:36)
Discussion ensued regarding the seven day appeal notification sent to property owners
on Planning Commission decisions, and Council Member Genis suggested changing the
7 -day appeal notification to 10 days. (01:48:43)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, expressed concerns on the setbacks. (01:53:37)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 4
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, spoke on density; group homes; and the 7 -day appeal
notification. (01:55:19)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on residential guidelines; setbacks; and expressed
opposition to guideline changes. (01:57:08)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the guideline changes.
(02:00:20)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer (02:01:52)
Council Member Genis clarified ratios and setbacks. (02:08:17)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council Member Genis, and Council
Member Monahan
Noes: Council Member Leece
Motion carried: 4-1
ACTION: City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-57, to be read by title only, and waived
further reading, amending the Residential Design Guidelines, with a change to Section 5,
adding "or over 2,700 square feet in area with up to 50 percent lot coverage" for second
story construction.
2. CODE AMENDMENT CO -1207: CONSIDERATION OF A MORATORIUM EXTENSION
REGARDING HOOKAH PARLORS: "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, FOR A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM
ON THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF NEW HOOKAH PARLORS FOR
A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS PENDING A STUDY OF
ZONING REGULATIONS THAT ARE NEEDED TO ALLEVIATE A CURRENT AND
ACTUAL THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY RELATING TO
HOOKAH PARLORS". (02:11:33)
Gary Armstrong, Economic and Development Services Director, presented the report
regarding a moratorium extension on Hookah lounges. (02:12:07)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on the reason for this amendment. (02:12:44)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, spoke in favor of the Ordinance. (02:15:32)
Minutes -- Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 5
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll. call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried. 5-0
ACTION: City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 13-09, to be read by title only,
and waived further reading, an extension of the hookah parlor moratorium considered
under Code Amendment CO -12-07 for a period not to exceed 10 months, 15 days.
OLD BUSINESS (02:16:08)
1. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 13-05 FOR CODE AMENDMENT CO -12-02: AN
AMENDMENT TO TITLE 13, CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 2, OF THE COSTA MESA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF "SINGLE HOUSEKEEPING
UNIT": "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING ZONING CODE AMENDMENT CO -12-02 RELATED TO ZONING CODE
REGULATIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES. THE AMENDMENT IS PROPOSED
TO THE FOLLOWING CODE SECTION IN TITLE 13 OF THE COSTA MESA
MUNICIPAL CODE: CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 2, SECTION 13-6, DEFINITIONS, AS IT
PERTAINS TO THE DEFINITION OF SINGLE HOUSEKEEPING UNIT." (02:16:13)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: City Council gave second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 13-05, to be read
by title only and waived further reading, amending the following section of Title 13 of the
Costa Mesa Municipal Code:
• Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 13-6, Definitions, as it pertains to the definition of "single
housekeeping unit."
2. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER IX OF TITLE 2 OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO APPEAL, REHEARING, AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, AMENDING
CHAPTER IX OF TITLE 2 OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
APPEAL, REHEARING, AND REVIEW PROCEDURE". (02:17:21)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, spoke on limiting public comments. (02:18:22)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to changing the ordinance. (02.19:56)
Robin. Leffler, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition changing the ordinance. (02:20:10)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 6
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the ordinance and is in support
of the rehearing process. (02:21:50)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the ordinance. (02:23:57)
Chris McEvoy, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the ordinance (02:25:01)
Eleanor Egan, Costa Mesa, suggested the Council have a rehearing process that
requires a super majority or unanimous vote. (02:25:40)
Mayor Righeimer spoke to the issue and explained the rehearing process. (02:26:12)
Council Member Genis spoke on instances where a rehearing is needed. (02:29:20)
City Attorney Duarte clarified Municipal Code Section 2-72 regarding Reconsideration.
(02:32:24)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
Council Member Leece cited Municipal Code Section 2-58, "Any Council Member shall
have the right to have the reasons for their dissent from any action of the Council entered
into the minutes. Such dissent to be entered in the minutes shall be made and
substantiated in the following manner," and stated she would like the minutes to reflect
her opposition to the action for the following reasons: Addressing the issue of
reconsideration, she stated that taking it outside of the Council Chambers and making it a
conversation with another Council Member who voted for something is taking the
business of the public away from the public. She indicated that there was evidence and
many people came and talked about Fairview Park and why the items should be reheard.
She stated it was a public matter, and that is probably why it was written into the
Municipal Code, and that the rehearing process is a public process. She stated that we
are cutting the people out, and are eliminating a step that is transparent, public, and fair.
She added Ms. Genis did a lot of research, and that a lot of people came to that hearing
and believed there was new relevant evidence which was not produced at the first
hearing and that evidence was denied as being new, In her opinion, the evidence was
new and it justified a rehearing. She hoped that this action does not hurt Costa Mesa in
the future, and that by skipping this process, we will be in trouble with an agency just like
we are in trouble with the Fish and Wildlife Department. Although maybe slow and
inefficient, she stated these steps are put in government for the people, facts, and
information. For these reasons, she expressed opposition to the change. (02:33:00)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on new information being produced and available for a
rehearing. (02:35:54)
Council Member Genis spoke on defining "available" and on new information being
provided; and expressed opposition to the motion. (02:37:05)
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- December 3, 2013 - Page 7
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Mayor Righeimer
Noes: Council Member Genis, and Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 3-2
ACTION: City Council gave second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 13-08, to be
read by title only and waived further reading, which amends Chapter IX of Title 2 of the
Costa Mesa Municipal Code relating to Appeal, Rehearing, and Review Procedures.
City Council recessed for a break at 8:42 p.m.
City Council reconvened the meeting at.8:55 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS (02:52:32)
1. URBAN MASTER PLAN SCREENING REQUEST (UMP -13-07) FOR A 37 -UNIT
DETACHED TOWNHOUSE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 573-591
VICTORIA STREET (02:52:35)
Report by Antonio Gardea, Planning Services Department. (02:52:57)
Discussion ensued between City Council and Mr. Gardea on setbacks, property
presentation, tandem parking, maximum density, open space, and parking spaces.
(02:58:16)
Don Lamm, Applicant Representative, spoke on urban planning, deviations versus
variances, and history of projects. (03:03:59)
Discussion continued regarding permeable pavers, setbacks, greenbelts, patios, a pool
area, homeowners' association dues, tandem parking, and a street signal. (03:11:44)
Terry Koken, Costa Mesa, spoke on tandem parking. (03:22:48)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, expressed concern with tandem parking; and spoke on
balconies being allowed over hardscape and softscape. (03:23:00)
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, spoke on the General Plan meeting and expressed
opposition to boxy buildings. (03:24:28)
Discussion ensued regarding tandem parking; boxy architecture; setbacks; and the
sidewalk issue. (03:26:21)
ACTION: City Council provided feedback on the proposed 37 -unit detached townhouse
condominium development within the Mesa West Residential Ownership Urban Plan
Area.
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 8
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
2. UPGRADES TO AUDIO/VISUAL EQUIPMENT AND BROADCAST SYSTEM AND
RELATED CONSTRUCTION FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS (43:29:43)
Report by Bill Lobdell, Director of Communications, and Dane Bora, Video Production
Coordinator. (03:30:05)
Discussion ensued regarding the podium location; general public seating; staff stations;
wheelchair ADA compliance; TV screens; an electronic voting system; field equipment;
archival issues; and indexing agendas, (03:36:19)
Terry Koken, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project. (03:57:22)
Sue Lester, Costa Mesa, spoke on replacement of the speaker outdoors and in support
of the project. (03:58:07)
Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project; and expressed concern with
layout changes, overhead control, and losing two rows of seats. (03:59:01)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, spoke on Conference Room 1A; the print shop; the channel
for the hearing impaired; and expressed support for the project. (04:02:11)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, spoke about a voice -to -text system; audience seating;
and expressed support in the project. (04:03:27)
Discussion ensued regarding computer use and presentations; lighting; and speaker
podiums and location. (04:05:00)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger requested that the speaker podium be placed in the front, and
include all upgrades to Conference Room 1A; and suggested the creation of a reserve
account for future upgrades. (04:07:34)
Council Member Genis expressed concern regarding the loss of public seating and spoke
on upgrading 1A to accommodate overflow seating. (04:08:16)
MOTION/SECOND: Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger/Council Member Monahan
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
1. City Council approved designating $1.6 million of the $7.1 million FY 201213 surplus
to upgrade the City's audio/visual equipment and broadcast system used to facilitate
and broadcast public meetings in the Council Chambers and broadcast city news and
information on CMTV, the City's television channel. The funding will also be used for
related construction in the Council Chambers; and
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 9
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
2. Directed the City staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the purchase and
installation of the new audio/visual equipment and broadcast system; and
3. Directed staff to obtain bids for related construction work needed in the Council
Chambers.
3. FIRST READING OF THE EXCESSIVE USE OF RESOURCES ORDINANCE: "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
ADDING CHAPTER VI (COST RECOVERY FOR EXCESSIVE USE OF RESOURCES
DUE TO NUISANCE ACTIVITIES AT LODGING ESTABLISHMENTS) OF TITLE 94
(POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING COST RECOVERY FOR EXCESSIVE USE OF POLICE SERVICES."
(04:09:39)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on the need for the Ordinance. (04:10:32)
Rick Francis, Assistant CEO, presented the report on the Ordinance. (04:11:50)
Elena Gherli, Legal Counsel, provided clarification on the definitions in the Ordinance.
(04:19:46)
Discussion ensued regarding calls for service; parole checks; targeted or saturation
patrols; and inverse condemnation. (04:22:29)
Mayor Righeimer commented on language regarding specific location for focused or
prolonged enforcement activity. (04:31:22)
Council Member Monahan concurred with removing the following: "Specific location for
focused or prolonged enforcement activity shall not be counted." (04:32:57)
Discussion ensued regarding the appeal process. (04:33:06)
Chief Gazsi spoke regarding focused or prolonged enforcement activity and criteria that
would trigger a billing. (04:34:02)
Council Member Genis spoke about calls for disturbing the peace for small
establishments. (04:36:49)
Council Member Monahan suggested a minimum of two calls per quarter. (04:38:19)
Assistant CEO Francis clarified that the trigger on the nuisance activities would be a
citation or arrest. (04:39:43)
Discussion ensued regarding billing notices to owners and notifications to each
establishment before the second reading. (04:41:04)
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, expressed concern on employee time and expense to
administer the program; spoke on establishments fearful of calling; room refusal by
owners; and inquired on Ordinances adopted by other cities. (04:44:36)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 10
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, expressed concern regarding discriminatory practices, and
requested statistics. (04:46:42)
Mike Lin, spoke on resources and cost recovery; and the definition of nuisance activity.
(04:47:54)
Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, supports applying to all lodging establishments; spoke on
calls from the rooms; and administrative costs. (04:51:39)
Laurie Dickendasher, Regency Inn Representative, spoke on unintended consequences
due to adoption of Ordinance. (04:54:17)
Jay Photoglou, Costa Mesa, spoke on the language that would trigger a report and
safeguards. (04:56:46)
Jack Chen, New Harbor Inn Representative, spoke on the City's surplus money to hire
more police officers; that hotel security guards do not have police powers and expressed
opposition to the Ordinance; and nuisance calls. (04:58:42)
Wilson Wang, President of the Taiwan Hotel/Motel Association of Southern California,
spoke about illegal activities at hotels; City revenue from the Transient Occupancy Tax;
and expressed opposition to the Ordinance. (05:01:52)
Scott Morlan, Costa Mesa, stated all his questions had been answered. (05:04:57)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, indicated that she hopes the Ordinance is not used to
discriminate. (05:05:17)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger spoke regarding screening hotel guests; reducing police calls;
long-term. stays at motels; resources for problem motels; and recommended a threshold.
(05:05:34)
Discussion ensued regarding data administration; other cities enacting motel restrictions;
police calls; and the need for more police officers. (05:12:00)
Council Member Genis stated that "calls for service" needs to be clearly defined; and how
different motels are managed. (05:16:06)
Council Member Monahan suggested using the "0.4 calls for service" threshold; spoke on
the history of the hotel/motel task force and operators properly managing their
businesses; and made a motion to approve the Ordinance for first reading, with a 0.4 -calf
threshold on a quarterly basis, and to eliminate the proposed service language section.
(05:19:33)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer
Mayor Righeimer expressed support for using a 0.4 threshold and removing the service
language. (05:22:08)
Mr. Francis spoke on delineation of calls. (05:25:54)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 11
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger supported the 0.4 calls threshold. (05:27:08)
Council Member Genis supported the motion, but requested that the definition of "service
calls" be clearly defined. (05:29:36)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer,
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: City Council introduced for first reading and adopted Ordinance 13-xx, to be
read by title only, and waived further reading, regarding the excessive use of resources,
and with a 0.4 -call threshold on a quarterly basis.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (05:30:47)
3. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2500: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO RE
PAID, funding City operating expenses for $659,620.74. (05:31:01)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, spoke on line item descriptions for warrants. (05:31:16)
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: Approved Warrant Resolution No. 2500, to be read by title only and waived
further reading.
4. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2501: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, INCLUDING PAYROLL REGISTER NO. 13-23 "A" AND 13-24 AND
SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO RE PAID, funding
Payroll No. 13-23 "A" for $-574.99, Payroll No. 13-24 for $1,992,347.15 and City
operating expenses for $333,999.81. (05:34:13)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, inquired about fees and services paid. (05:34:26)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 12
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: Approved Warrant Resolution No. 2501, to be read by title only and waived
further reading.
5. DOWNTOWN COSTA MESA GATEWAY LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, FEDERAL
PROJECT NO. STPE-PO55 (055), CITY PROJECT NO. 13-06 (05:36:43)
Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project. (05:37:00)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project; and commented on grant
funding. (05:37:45)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project; and commented on
granting projects to local Costa Mesa organizations. (05:38:20)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Council Member Leece
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
1. City Council adopted plans, specifications, and working details for the Downtown
Costa Mesa Gateway Landscape Improvements on SR -55 Freeway, City Project No.
13-06; and
2. Awarded a construction contract to Horizons Construction Co. Int'I, Inc., 1173 N. Patt
Street, Anaheim, CA 92801 in the amount of $554,460.00; and
3. Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Public Works Agreement.
6. EAST 17TH STREET LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT, FEDERAL PROJECT NO.
RPSTPLNE-5312(091), CITY PROJECT NO. 13-12 (05:39:04)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, requested clarification on grant money used for this project.
(05:39:08)
Ernesto Munoz, Public Services Director, stated that grant monies are being utilized; and
indicated that traffic fees are being utilized for traffic improvements at Tustin and 17th
Street. (05:39:37)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 13
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MOTIONISECOND: Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger/Council Member Monahan
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
1. City Council adopted plans, specifications, and working details for the East 17th Street
Landscape Enhancement, City Project No. 13-12; and
2. Awarded a construction contract to Horizons Construction Co. Int'l, Inc., 1173 N. Patt
Street, Anaheim, CA 92801 in the amount of $776,995.00; and
3. Approved Budget Adjustment No. 14-018, in the amount of $30,000.00 towards the
project; and
4. Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Public Works Agreement and
the Budget Adjustment.
8. HARBOR BOULEVARD BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, FEDERAL PROJECT NO.
RPSTPLE-5312 (083), CITY PROJECT NO. 13-05 (05:42:05)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, spoke on federal funding for the projects. (05:42:15)
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
1. City Council adopted plans, specifications, and working details for the Harbor
Boulevard Beautification Project, City Project No. 13-05; and
2. Awarded a construction contract to Jeff Tracy, Inc. DBA Land Form Construction, in
the amount of $572,809.95 (base bid plus additive bid item No. AD -1); and
3. Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Public Works Agreement.
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 14
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
9. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES TO PROVIDE STAFF SUPPORT FOR
VARIOUS PARKS PROJECTS (05:44:12)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, requested clarification on park projects. (05:44.37)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
1. City Council awarded a contract to Civil Source, Inc., 9890 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine,
California 92618, in an amount not to exceed $200,000 to provide Project Management
and/or Construction Management staff support as needed for various Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) projects; and
2. Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services
Agreement; and
3. Approved Budget Adjustment No. 14-010 in the amount of $200,000 to fund the above
mentioned contract.
10. MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE REPORT: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE
REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013." (05:49:13)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Council Member Leece
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-55, to be read by title only, and waived
further reading, approving the Renewed Measure M2 Expenditure Report.
11. PUBLIC SAFETY APPLICATION SUPPORT CONTRACT (05:49:34)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, expressed support of Consent Calendar Items 11, 12
and 13.105:50.,03)
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- December 3, 2013 - Page 15
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer,
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: City Council authorized the City CEO or his designee to sign the Maintenance
and Support Agreement and Purchase Requisition for support services in the amount of
$58,301 for the City's CAD -RMS system with Motorola Inc., 1303 East Algonquin Road,
Schaumburg, IL 60196.
12. RECOMMENDED ACCEPTANCE AND ALLOCATION OF THE 2013 EDWARD BYRNE
MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) FUNDS (05:49:34)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
1. City Council approved staff's recommendation to allocate 2013 Edward Byrne
Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) funds to the Police Department's operating
budget, and
2. Approved Budget Adjustment No. 14-015 to increase revenue and appropriations in
the JAG fund, and allocate funds as follows:
• Technology Improvement — South Coast Plaza Streaming Live Video to
Responding Police Vehicles: $17,896
13. APPROVE THE PURCHASE AND OUTFITTING OF TEN REPLACEMENT 2014 FORD
POLICE INTERCEPTOR UTILITY VEHICLES (05:49:34)
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- December 3, 2013 - Page 16
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
ACTION:
1. City Council approved and authorized the CEO to sign the purchase agreement in the
amount of $318,406.70 for ten replacement Ford Police Interceptor Utility vehicles
from National Auto Fleet Group, 490 Auto Center Drive, Watsonville, CA 95076,. under
the National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA) master vehicle contract #102811, and
under existing City of Costa Mesa Purchase Order 0000008608; and
2. Approved and authorized the CEO to sign the purchase agreement in the amount of
$125,162.77 for outfitting ten new Ford Police Interceptor Utility vehicles from Hi
Standard Automotive, LLC, 1110 West Barkley Avenue, Orange, CA, 92868, under
existing City of Costa Mesa Purchase Order 0000008786; and
3. Approved Budget Adjustment No. 14-019 to appropriate undesignated fund balance in
the General Fund in the amount of $443,569.47 for the total purchase of ten vehicles
with the required outfitted emergency safety equipment.
14. MODIFICATON TO PUBLIC COMMENTS AND CONSENT CALENDAR ON THE CITY
COUNCIL AGENDA: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE ORDER OF BUSINESS FOR CITY
COUNCIL MEETINGS" (05:51:43)
Terry Koken, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to changing the Order of Business; and
spoke on Freedom of Speech. (05:51:58)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to changing the Order of .Business;
and spoke on Freedom of Speech. (05:54:35)
MOTION: Continue the meeting past midnight. (05:57:33)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Council Member Leece
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Noes: None
Absent: None
The motion carried: 5-0
Eleanor Egan, Costa Mesa, spoke on Freedom of Speech; and expressed opposition to
changing the Order of Business. (05:57:44)
Jay Photoglou, Costa Mesa, spoke on restrictions; and expressed opposition to changing
Order of Business. (06:01:49)
Perry Valantine, Costa Mesa, spoke on the average time for public comments, and the
motive for the change. (06:05:26)
Charles Mooney, Costa Mesa, spoke on the First Amendment Coalition; Freedom of
Speech; and expressed opposition to changing the process. (06:08:29)
Minutes -- Regular Meeting -- December 3, 2013 - Page 17
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to changing the Order of Business;
spoke on Freedom of Speech. (06:11:19)
Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to changing the Order of Business;
spoke on Freedom of Speech; and expressed concern on random drawing, (06:13:35)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, shared an article from the Daily Pilot. (06:16:46)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on the Consent Calendar; Freedom of Speech; and
opposed to changing the Order of Business. (06:19:58)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, spoke on Freedom of Speech; and opposed to changing the
Order of Business. (06:23:25)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, spoke against changing the Order of Business.
(06:24:14)
Chris McEvoy, Costa Mesa, opposed to changing the Order of Business; and Freedom of
Speech. (06:25:00)
Sue Lester, Costa Mesa, spoke against changing the Order of Business; and Freedom of
Speech. (06:26:46)
Mayor Righeimer stated that the cards are shuffled face down; spoke on adding a second
Council Comments section; and spoke on Freedom of Speech. (06:29:54)
MOTION/SECOND: Mayor Righeimer/Council Member Monahan
To adopt Resolution No. 13-56, Changing the Order of Business.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: To receive and file (06:34:29)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Leece/Council Member Genis
Motion failed by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Leece, and Council Member Genis
Noes: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Council Member Monahan
Motion failed 2-3.
Council Member Genis spoke about the amount of time spent on items on the agenda.
(06:34:43)
Council Member Monahan spoke on Public Comments in Costa Mesa and in other cities.
(06:45:55)
Council Member Leece spoke on the Presentations section; spoke on Freedom of
Speech; and indicated opposition to changing the Order of Business. (06:47:45)
Council Member Genis spoke on the Government Code regarding the Order of Business.
(06:52:49)
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- December 3, 2013 - Page 18
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger spoke on Freedom of Speech; meeting with citizens; allowing
more speakers to speak with a reduced time limit; and the need for a schedule.
(06:54:10)
ORIGINAL MOTION: Mayor Righeimer/Council Member Monahan
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Council Member Monahan
Noes: Council Member Genis, and Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 3-2
ACTION: City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-56, to be read by title only, and waived
further reading, adding an "Additional Public Comments" section to the agenda, changing
the order when "Items removed from the Consent calendar" will be addressed, and
adding "Additional Council Comments" after "Additional Public Comments".
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS (06:57:41)
Chris McEvoy, Costa Mesa, spoke on decision making; and Freedom of Speech. (06:57:59)
Jay Photoglou, Costa Mesa, suggested presentations be done last. (07:00:31)
Charles Mooney, Costa Mesa., spoke on the removal of the decomposed granite path at
Fairview Park. (07:03:42)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, spoke about grants; and placement of items on the Consent
Calendar. (07:04:57)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, spoke on Freedom of Speech; the General Plan meetings; and the
removal of the decomposed granite path. (07:07:15)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, welcomed Fire Chief Stefano; spoke on Freedom of Speech;
and civility. (07:10:01)
Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, spoke on civility; Public Hearings; and shortage of fields. (07:12:53)
REPORT -- CITY ATTORNEY — None
ADJOURNMENT — To Regular Meeting, January 7, 2014, 5:00 p.m.
The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 1:20 a.m.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
Minutes — Regular Meeting — December 3, 2013 - Page 19
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COSTA MESA CITY COUNCIL, AND
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
January 21, 2014
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the Mayor at 5:05 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Costa
Mesa City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, California.
ROLL CALL
Council Members Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council Member
Genis and Council Member Monahan (arrived at 5:30 p.m.)
Council Members Absent: Council Member Leece
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS - NONE
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council recessed into Closed Session at 5:08 p.m. to consider the following items:
1. Conference with Thomas R. Hatch, Chief Executive Officer, and Labor Negotiator,
Agency Negotiator regarding Employee Organization: Costa Mesa City Employee
Association (CMCEA), pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6.
2. Conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: Costa Mesa Employees
Association v. City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation, et al., Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 30-2011 00475281, pursuant to California Government Code
Section 54956.9(a).
The City Council reconvened at 6:03 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER (00:00:10)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (00:00:17) — Mayor Pro Tem Steve Mensinger
MOMENT OF SOLEMN EXPRESSION (00:03:13)
Father Tashjian, St. Mary Armenian Church
ROLL CALL (00:03:12)
Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council Member Leece, Council
Member Genis and Council Member Monahan
Absent: Council Member Leece
Minutes -- Regular Meeting — January 21, 2014 - Page 1
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Officials Present: Chief Executive Officer Thomas R. Hatch, City Attorney Thomas Duarte,
Assistant Chief Executive Officer Rick Francis, Economic and Development Services
Director Gary Armstrong, Public Services Director Ernesto Munoz, and City Clerk Brenda
Green.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT (00:03:35) - NONE
• COIN: Ex Parte Communications pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2-238 (b)- None
ANNOUNCEMENTS (00:03:39)
"Costa Mesa Minute" was played featuring upcoming events and activities in the community.
PRESENTATIONS (00:05:50)
Presentation by the 2014 Sister City Youth Ambassadors from Wydham Australia. Mayor
Righeimer provided the students with Certificates of Recognition.
PUBLIC COMMENTS (00:21:03)
Terry Koken, Costa Mesa, spoke regarding the Mayor's comments. (00:21:36)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, thanked everyone involved in the Homeless Housing
Outreach workshop; and announced the First Friday Road Show on February 7th, 2014.
(00:24:25)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, spoke regarding Public Records Requests; and warrants.
(00:25:47)
Sue Lester, Costa Mesa, spoke on the 60th Anniversary documents and release of
information to the public. (00:27;09)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, spoke on a New Yorker magazine article; and pensions.
(00:30:16)
Chris McEvoy, Costa Mesa, spoke on Rule of law; Fairview Park path; and public comments.
(00:33:27)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on the Historical Society; and the budget. (00:35:59)
COUNCIL MEMBER'S REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS (00:38:28)
Council Member Monahan -- None (00:38:30)
Mayor Righeimer requested information on the 60th Anniversary issue and the police
investigation. (00:38:33)
Minutes -- Regular Meeting — January 21, 2014 - Page 2
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
CEO Hatch spoke on the release of the 60th Anniversary documents and the police
investigation. (00:39:12)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on public comments; and the budget reserves. (00:40:00)
CEO Hatch announced the budget surplus amounts from the last three years; and
announced the Mid -Year budget Study Session on February 11th, 2014. (00:42:00)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger reported on the 9th Annual Costa Mesa United Golf event; spoke
on the City budget; and the pension unfunded liability. (00:44:45)
Council Member Genis spoke regarding the budget; warrants and financial details; paying off
the fire side fund; and thanked the Fire Department regarding the brush fires at Fairview
Park. (00:48:00)
REPORT- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) (00:51:26)
CEO Hatch announced the Mid -Year Budget Study Session on February 11th, 2014 at 4:30
p.m.; spoke on the 60th Anniversary event; the establishment of a Purchasing Committee;
read the worker's compensation update and stated that the 14 recommendations have been
completed; spoke on computer improvements; and invited the public to attend the General
Plan Study Session on January 28th, 2014.
CONSENT CALENDAR (00:56:49)
MOTION: Approved recommended actions for Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 through 9
except for Items 4 and 5.
MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and
Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: Council Member Leece
Motion carried: 4-0-1
1. PROCEDURAL WAIVER: MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE ONLY
OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY
TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER READING WAIVED
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council waived reading in full of Ordinances and Resolutions and approval and
adoption of same by reading title only.
2. READING FOLDER
a. Claims received by the City Clerk: David B. Thompson
Minutes — Regular Meeting — January 21, 2014 - Page 3
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
b. Requests for Alcohol Beverage Control Licenses:
• For Fresh & Easy, at 1835 Newport Blvd., Suite C140, a fiduciary transfer of
a State Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License Type "20" (Off -Sale Beer
and Wine) and "86" (Instructional Tasting).
• For Al Forno Cafe, at 1525 Mesa Verde Drive East, Suites 124 and 125, an
original State Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License Type "41" (On- Sale
Beer and Wine, Eating Place).
• For Aloha Grill, at 1749 Newport Blvd., a person-to-person transfer of a
State Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License Type "47" (On -Sale
General, Eating Place).
• For Kitakata Ramen Ban Nai, at 891 Baker Street, Suite B21, a person-to-
person transfer of a State Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License Type "41"
(On -Sale Beer and Wine, Eating Place).
• For Pub 33, at 1562 Newport Blvd., #C&D, an original State Alcoholic
Beverage Control (ABC) License Type "48" (On -Sale General, Public
Premise).
ACTION: Received and filed.
3. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2507: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, INCLUDING PAYROLL REGISTER NO. 14-01 AND 13-26 "A" AND
SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE PAID, funding
Payroll No. 14-01 for $2,209,017.52, Payroll No. 13-26 "A" for -11.68 and City
operating expenses for $1,054,820.89.
ACTION: Approved Warrant Resolution No. 2507, to be read by title only and further
reading waived.
6. REFUND OF CASH DEPOSIT IN CONNECTION WITH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
NO. PS12-00415 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT 449 HAMILTON ST, COSTA
MESA, CALIFORNIA
ACTION:
City Council approved the refund of cash deposit in connection with Encroachment
Permit No. PS12-00415, in the amount of $18,925.00 to Do Construction And Design
Inc., (Contractor), 10495 Bolsa Avenue, Westminster, California 92683.
Minutes — Regular Meeting — January 21, 2014 - Page 4
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
7. REFUND OF CASH DEPOSIT IN CONNECTION WITH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
NO. PS13-00123 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT 2269 SANTA ANA AVENUE,
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA
ACTION:
City Council approved the refund of cash deposit in connection with Encroachment
Permit No. PS13-00123 in the amount of $17,824.80 to Dennis Gimian, 3 Rana,
Irvine, CA 92612.
8. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR THE NEWPORT BOULEVARD AND ADAMS
AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECTS
ACTION:
1. City Council approved the Cooperative Agreements between the City of Costa
Mesa and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for the Newport
Boulevard and Adams Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization (TSS) Projects; and
2. Authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the above agreements.
9. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR HIS
DESIGNEES TO EXECUTE A SUB -RECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA ENTITLED: AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OR PURCHASE OF
EQUIPMENTISERVICES OR FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF TRAINING COSTS FOR
THE FY 2013 URBAN AREAS SECURITY INITIATIVE (UASI)'.
ACTION:
1. City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-02, to be read by title only and waived
further reading, that authorizes the Chief Executive Officer or his designee to
execute the attached Sub -Recipient Agreement with the City of Santa Ana to
receive a grant under the FY 2013 Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Grant
Program; and
2. Authorized the Police Department to accept FY 2013 UASI reimbursement funds
allocated to the City of Costa Mesa in an amount not to exceed $5,121. This
amount will reimburse training costs included but not limited to tuition, overtime,
and backfill for pre -approved Office of Domestic Preparedness -approved training
for police, fire, and city personnel; and
3. Approved Budget Adjustment No. 14-022 in the amount of $5,121 to increase
revenue and appropriate the grant funds to the Police Department's operating
budget.
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- January 21, 2014 - Page 5
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
PUBLIC HEARINGS — 7:00 p.m. (Resolution No. 05-55) (00:57:40)
1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP -13-03 FOR THE PROPOSED 2013-2021
HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE TO THE 2000 GENERAL PLAN: "A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING ADDENDUM TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
GENERAL PLAN GP -13-03 FOR THE PROPOSED 2013-2021 HOUSING
ELEMENT". (00:58:00)
Staff report presented by Minoo Ashabi, Principal Planner and Laura Stetson, MIG.
(00:58:20)
Council Member Genis expressed concern with losing affordable housing and low
income units; and asked how to address the loss of housing for low income families.
(01:06:20)
Ms. Stetson indicated that there can be language included if resources come
available the City will designate resources for rehabilitation. (01:08:57)
Council Member Genis asked if the City is tracking the loss of affordable units,
(01:09:30)
Ms. Ashabi responded that the City does track on an annual basis and also provides a
report to the Planning Commission and the City Council. (01:10:10)
Council Member Genis stated that the fees on pg. 71 seem to be lower than other
cities and it might be time to examine the fee structure. (01:10:30)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on condominium conversions; setbacks; affordable
housing; and parking problems. (01:11:10)
Council Member Monahan complimented staff on a great report. (01:14:00)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call Vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger,
and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: Council Member Leece
Motion carried: 4-0-1
ACTION:
City Council adopted Addendum to Final Program EIR and approvod General Plan
Amendment GP -13-03 for the proposed 2013-2021 Housing Element, by adoption of
Resolution No. 14-03, to be read by title only, and waived further reading.
Minutes — Regular Meeting — January 21, 2014 - Page 6
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
OLD BUSINESS -- NONE
NEW BUSINESS (01:14:40)
1. URBAN MASTER PLAN SCREENING REQUEST (UMP -13-08) FOR AN 89 -UNIT
RESIDENTIAL AND LIVEIWORK DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 1620 THROUGH
1644 WHITTIER AVENUE (01:16:10)
Staff report provided by Mel Lee, Senior Planner. (01:15:20)
Council Member Genis spoke on the views blocked by Banning Ranch; density and
calculation requirements; general floor area ratios; and traffic studies. (01:21:45)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger asked for clarification on the 10 acre property to the west
of the site; and spoke on parking requirements. (01:25:55)
Mr. Lee reviewed the parking space requirements; CC&R's; and storage space for
units. (01:26:20)
Discussion ensued regarding parking requirements for residential loft units. (01:28:48)
Chris McEvoy, Costa Mesa, spoke on project density; parking and traffic concerns;
and ocean views from the Senior Center. (01:33:22)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, demonstrated slides and spoke on ocean views; spoke
on the need to protect affordable housing; overlay zones, including mobile home
parks; and expressed parking concerns. (01:35:55)
Wanda Garro, Costa Mesa, spoke regarding public notification; signage regarding
chemicals; inquired if the land is contaminated; spoke on parking spaces; and
expressed traffic concerns. (01:39:35)
Mayor Righeimer reviewed the notification process on the project. (01:42:30)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on public notifications; read a letter regarding
excessive traffic, noise and air pollution and smoke from rooftop bbq's. (01:43:15)
Cindy Black, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to the project due to density. (01:46:15)
Council Member Monahan spoke on the screening process for parking spaces; spoke
on the history of the school district property; recommended to make the separation
larger; and spoke on traffic problem alleviation. (01:48:40)
Council Member Genis recommended the 6' separation; spoke on oil wells;
contamination at the school district site and annexing the school site; suggested the
Minutes — Regular Meeting — January 21, 2014 - Page 7
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
City look at purchasing large parcels as they become available; and spoke on density,
open space and impacts to schools. (01:52:03)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on contamination at sites; and spoke on revitalization of
neighborhoods. (01:56:10)
Council Member Genis suggested asking applicants for affordable units. (01:58:58)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger spoke in support of the project. (01:59:35)
City Council provided feedback on the proposed project as described below:
• Urban Master Plan screening for an 89 -unit detached residential development,
consisting of 3 stories and a roof deck. 40 of the units are live/work, 27 units are
residential lofts, and 22 units are traditional residential. The site has a General
Plan land use designation of Light Industry and a zoning classification of MG
(General Industrial). The site is also located within the Mesa West Bluffs Urban
Plan.
2. EXCESSIVE USE OF RESOURCES COST RECOVERY AMOUNT RESOLUTION:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE INVOICE PERIOD AND COST RECOVERY
AMOUNT FOR EXCESSIVE USE OF POLICE SERVICES UNDER CHAPTER VI OF
TITLE 14 OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE". (02:00:05)
Staff report provided by Rick Francis, Assistant CEO. (02:00:35)
Discussion ensued regarding fees; and average costs of calls. (02:01:20)
Council member Genis requested clarification on the average cost of a call. (02:02:20)
Assistant CEO Francis reviewed the methodology and total budget. (02:02;50)
Discussion ensued regarding officer time; methodology; on call time for police officers;
disproportionate effect of living close to motels; and cost recovery amount. (02:07:00)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on the fee for excessive use of calls; indicated that
other uses should be charged the same amount; and spoke on safety. (02:19:00)
Andrea Marcos, Costa Mesa, recommended gathering data on calls from businesses
and measuring data. (02:21:35)
Mike Lin, Costa Mesa, spoke on the excessive service call fee; and stated that lodging
operators may hesitate before calling in. (02:22:32)
Discussion ensued regarding excessive false alarm fees. (02:25:30)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — January 21, 2014 W Page 8
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger spoke on the impacts to motels and clients from
surrounding businesses. (02:26:00)
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer
Council Member Genis stated that the $360.00 cost recovery amount is probably not
unreasonable but does not see enough evidence in the record to support that amount;
and asked to look at apartments under the Motel Ordinance as well. (02:27:59)
Council Member Monahan spoke in support of the cost recovery amount. (02:30:00)
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: Council Member Genis
Absent: Council Member Leece
Motion carried: 3-1-1
ACTION:
City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-04, to be read by title only and waived further
reading, regarding the cost recovery amount for excessive use of resources by
lodging establishments.
3. CITY STAFF REORGANIZATION: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 08-58
BY ESTABLISHING NEW CLASSIFICATIONS REPRESENTED BY THE COSTA
MESA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION" AND "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 BY AMENDING THE FIRE ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSIGNMENT PAY". (02:30:45)
Staff report provided by CEO Tom Hatch. (02:31:10)
Discussion ensued on the Senior Maintenance Worker position; Park Ranger and
Part -Time Park Ambassador positions; the hiring of four (4) additional Police Officers;
and police staffing levels. (02:37:50)
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Council Member Genis
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger,
and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent. Council Member Leece
Motion carried: 4-0-1
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- January 21, 2014 - Page 9
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
ACTION:
The City Council:
1. Authorized the following 12 positions:
a. Senior Maintenance Worker (2 positions)
b. Public Right of Way Coordinator
C. Assistant Chief Executive Officer/Administrative Services Director
d. Deputy City Clerk
e. Human Resources Analyst
f. Buyer
g. Battalion Chief —Administration
h. Police Officers (4 positions); and
2. Created a Parks and Community Services Department (no staffing changes);
and
3. Approved Resolution Nos. 14-05 and 14-06, to be read by title only and waived
further reading; and
4. Appropriated $600,000 from the General Fund fund balance to fund these
positions for the remainder of FY 2013-14.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (02:48:40)
4. BAKER STREET AND BEAR STREET INTERSECTION IMROVEMENTS, CITY
PROJECT NO. 11-10 (02:48:45)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, supports the projects; and spoke on grant funding.
(02:49:05)
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger,
and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: Leece
Motion carried: 4-0-1
(02:57:00)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — January 21, 2014 - Page 10
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
ACTION:
1. City Council accepted the work performed by C.T. & F., Inc. and authorized the
City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion; and
2. Authorized to Release the Labor and Material Bond seven (7) months after the
filing date; release the Faithful Performance Bond one (1) year after the filing date;
and release the retention monies 35 days after the Notice of Completion filing
date.
5. 19th STREET REHABILITATION FROM NEWPORT BOULEVARD TO PARK
AVENUE — CITY PROJECT NO. 12-20
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger,
and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: Council Member Leece
Motion carried: 4-0-1
(02:57:00)
ACTION:
1. City Council accepted the work performed by All American Asphalt and authorized
the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion; and
2. Authorized to Release the Labor and Material Bond seven (7) months after the
filing date; release the Faithful Performance Bond one (1) year after the filing date;
and release the retention monies 35 days after the Notice of Completion filing
date.
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS - NONE
COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS ON CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS - NONE
REPORT -- CITY ATTORNEY - NONE
ADJOURNMENT (02:57:20) — In memory of Anna Reagan.
The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 9:01 p.m.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- January 21, 2014 - Page 11
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COSTA MESA CITY COUNCIL,
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
APRIL 1, 2014
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the Mayor at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at
Costa Mesa City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, California.
ROLL CALL
Council Members Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council
Member Leece, Council Member Genis and Council Member
Monahan
Council Members Absent: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council recessed into Closed Session at 5:00 p.m. to consider the following
items:
1. Conference with Thomas R. Hatch, Chief Executive Officer, and Labor Negotiator,
Agency Negotiator regarding Employee Organization: Costa Mesa Police Officers
Association (CMPOA), pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6.
2. Conference with Thomas R. Hatch, Chief Executive Officer, and Labor Negotiator,
Agency Negotiator regarding Employee Organization: Costa Mesa City Employee
Association (CMCEA), pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6.
3. Conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: Costa Mesa Employees
Association v, City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation, et al., Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 30-2011 00475281, pursuant to California Government
Code Section 54956.9(a).
The City Council reconvened at 6:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER (00:00:05)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (00:00:23) — Council Member Leece
MOMENT OF SOLEMN EXPRESSION (00:00:45) — Pastor Phil Eyskens, Lighthouse
Church
ROLL CALL (00:02:20)
Minutes — Regular Meeting —April 1, 2014 - Page 1
Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council Member Leece,
Council Member Genis and Council Member Monahan.
Absent: None
Officials Present: Chief Executive Officer Thomas R. Hatch, City Attorney Thomas
Duarte, Assistant Chief Executive Officer Rick Francis, Assistant Chief Executive
Officer/Administrative Services Director Tamara Letourneau; Economic and
Development Services Director Gary Armstrong, Public Services Director Ernesto
Munoz, and City Clerk Brenda Green.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT — NONE
• COIN: Ex Parte Communications pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2-238 (b) —
None
ANNOUNCEMENTS (00:02:51)
"Costa Mesa Minute" was played featuring upcoming events and activities in the
community.
PRESENTATIONS (00:05:09)
Presentation by Ambassador John Whalen on Donate Life California
PUBLIC COMMENTS (00:09:41)
Susan Shaw, Costa Mesa, spoke on traffic. (00:09:59)
Fabiola Soto, Community Service Programs Project Path, spoke about Costa Mesa
Police Explorers' participation in a campaign to deter driving under the influence of
alcohol. (00:11:58)
Robert Graham, Costa Mesa, spoke on undergrounding utilities. (00:14:02)
Laurene Keane, Costa Mesa, spoke about sober living homes and the Preserve our
Neighborhood Task Force. (00:16:11)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, commented on pension contributions; vacancies in police
and fire departments; and department organization. (00:19:43)
Dana Lavin, Costa Mesa, spoke about Bruno, police dog; K-9 training; and police officer
recruitment. (00:22:04)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — April 1, 2014 - Page 2
Chris McEvoy, Costa Mesa, commented on the draft Charter; traffic problems; Friday
Night lights; developments; the hiring of a private investigator; and the trail at Fairview
Park. (00:25:36)
Sue Lester, Costa Mesa, spoke about the 60th Anniversary Committee meeting; and
Fairview Park. (00:28:45)
Ann Parker, Costa Mesa, spoke on sober living homes and group homes. (00:30:10)
COUNCIL MEMBER'S REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS (00:34:17)
Council Member Leece spoke on vandalism at the train station at Fairview Park; traffic;
and group homes. (00:34:20)
Mayor Righeimer spoke about group homes; the Neighborhood Improvement Task
Force; undergrounding of utilities; the Charter; outsourcing of street sweeping services;
and Clover Choir at Carnegie Hall. (00:37:26)
Public Services Director Ernesto Munoz provided an update regarding undergrounding
utilities. (00:47:46)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger commented on group homes; improvements at Victoria
Street; and back -to -school night at Estancia High School. (00:57:00)
Council Member Genis spoke about the Great American Write -In; Fairview Park; spoke
on undergrounding; upcoming community meetings; group homes; and the choir at
Saint John the Baptist. (00:58:55)
REPORT- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) (01:02:50)
CEO Hatch spoke on unfunded pension liabilities and the fire side fund; employee
service awards; Fire Department staff development; upcoming community meetings;
earthquake response and preparedness; City goals and expectations; John Wayne
airport settlements; distracted drivers; and group homes.
CONSENT CALENDAR (01:11:57)
MOTION: Approved recommended actions for Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 through 8
except for Items 4 and 6.
MOVEDISECOND: Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger/Council Member Leece
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan,
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
Minutes — Regular Meeting — April 1, 2014 - Page 3
1. PROCEDURAL WAIVER, MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE
ONLY OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS THAT APPEAR ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ
BY TITLE ONLY AND FURTHER READING WAIVED
ACTION:
City Council waived reading in full of Ordinances and Resolutions and approval
and adoption of same by reading title only.
2. READING FOLDER
a. Claims received by the City Clerk: Tiffany Frignacchase and Sergio Galaviz.
ACTION: Received and filed.
3. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2512: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS
AND DEMANDS, INCLUDING PAYROLL REGISTER NO. 14-05 "A" AND 14-
06 AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE
PAID, funding Payroll No.14-05 "A" for $-21.75, Payroll No. 14-06 for
$2,025,289.40 and City operating expenses for $1,234,436.96.
ACTION:
Approved Warrant Resolution No. 2512, to be read by title only and further
reading waived.
5, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR PLANNING CONSULTANTS
ACTION:
1. City Council approved Amendment One, revising existing cap of $100,000
not to exceed $255,000, to the Professional Services Agreement with the
Lilley Planning Group; and
2. Authorized the City Chief Executive Officer to sign the amended Professional
Services Agreement with Lilley Planning Group.
7. AGREEMENT FOR PROSECUTION SERVICES
ACTION:
1. City Council approved the Agreement between the City of Costa Mesa and
the County of Orange for Prosecution Services; and
Minutes — Regular Meeting — April 1, 2014 - Page 4
2. Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement.
0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE INCLUSION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN
THE CITY'S JURISDICTION IN THE CALIFORNIA HERO PROGRAM TO
FINANCE DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES,
ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS AND ELECTRIC
VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE, AND APPROVING THE
AMENDMENT TO A CERTAIN JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RELATED
THERETO
ACTION:
City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-18, to be read by title only and waived
further reading, consenting to the inclusion of properties within the City's
Jurisdiction in the California HERO Program to Finance Distributed Generation
Renewable Energy Sources, Energy and Water Efficiency Improvements and
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure and approved an amendment to a
certain joint powers agreement related thereto.
PUBLIC HEARINGS — 7:00 p.m. (Resolution No. 05-55) — NONE
OLD BUSINESS — (01:14:30)
1. SMALL LOT ORDINANCE: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONING CODE AMENDMENT CO -13-
04 AMENDING TITLE 13, CHAPTERS I, IV, AND V RELATED TO DEFINITIONS,
LAND USE MATRIX AND NEW ARTICLE 13-42
Staff report provided by Principal Planner Minoo Ashabi. (01:15:00)
Phil Morello, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the Small Lot Ordinance. (01:16:30)
Jim Fitzpatrick, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the Small Lot Ordinance.
(01:19:30)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, commented on developments. (01:22:40)
Joe Flanagan, Red Oak Investments, spoke in support of the Small Lot Ordinance.
(01:25:47)
Chris McEvoy, Costa Mesa, spoke on developments and parking. (01:26:45)
Peter Naghavi spoke in support of the Small Lot Ordinance. (01:29:29)
Minutes — Regular Meeting —April 1, 2014 - Page 5
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the Small Lot Ordinance;
and commented on parking requirements. (01:31:44)
Cynthia McDonald, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to the Small Lot Ordinance;
and commented on density, setbacks, parking and developments. (01:34:53)
Susan Shaw, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to the Small Lot Ordinance; and
expressed concerns with traffic. (01:38:11)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, spoke on the Small Lot Ordinance. (01:40:00)
Katie Arthur, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to the Small Lot Ordinance; and
expressed concerns with open space, parking, and infrastructure. (01:43:15)
Al Melone, Costa Mesa, expressed concern with the Small Lot Ordinance; and
spoke on the General Plan. (01:45:35)
Robert Graham, Costa Mesa, spoke on parking and building permits (01:48:30)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on parking standards, density, traffic studies; and variance
issues. (01:52:20)
Discussion regarding Homeowners' Associations and Maintenance Associations.
(02:03:40)
Discussion ensued on parking and vehicle access. (02:06:25)
Council Member Leece spoke on project developments; common lot requirement;
lot area; open space, density; and expressed that the Ordinance will have a
negative effect. (02:09:44)
Council Member Genis spoke in support of a Small Lot Ordinance, but not with the
one proposed; and commented on CEQA; setbacks; density; overlay zones;
maintenance association issues; provided information on ownership and rental
rates. (02:12:40)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger spoke on the large demand for homes. (02:23:35)
MOVED/SECOND: Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger/Council Member Monahan
MOTION: To approve with revisions to Table 13-42: removing the requirement for
developments with more than 10 units to provide two additional guest parking
spaces, and reducing the setback minimum to five feet. (02:27:00)
City Attorney Duarte advised that changes to the Ordinance would require an
additional second reading. (02:28:10)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — April 1, 2014 - Page 6
Council Member Monahan withdrew his second of the motion. (02:28:18)
Original motion died for lack of a second.
Council Member Genis expressed opposition to the motion. (02:29:25)
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Approve second reading and adopt the ordinance.
MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor
Righeimer
Nays: Council Member Genis and Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 3-2
ACTION.
City Council gave second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 14-04, to be read
by title only and waived further reading, amending Title 13, Chapter I, IV, and V
related to definitions; amendment to land use matrix; and a new Article 2.5 to
Chapter V to allow small lot subdivisions in multiple family zoning districts and
urban plan areas.
City Council recessed for a break at 8:41 p.m.
City Council reconvened the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS (02:51:45)
1. APPROVE POSTING OF A MONETARY REWARD IN MURDER
INVESTIGATION (02:51:50)
Council Member Genis asked if the language could be revised to reflect a reward
in the amount of "up to $10,000." (02:51:55)
MOTION: Approve recommended action, and to revise the reward amount to "up
to $10,000." (02:52:37)
MOVED/SECOND: Mayor Righeimer/Council Member Genis
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis and Council Member Leece, Council Member
Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
Minutes — Regular Meeting — April 1, 2014 - Page 7
ACTION:
City Council approved the posting of a monetary reward in the amount of up to
ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for information leading to the arrest and
conviction of the persons or persons responsible for the murder of Gary Smola,
in compliance with City Council Policy 400-1, Reward Policy.
2, APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS COUNCIL -APPOINTED COMMITTEES AND
BOARD (02:52:55)
Staff report provided by City Clerk Brenda Green. (02:52:57)
ACTION:
City Council made appointments and reappointments to fill vacancies on the
following committees and board:
• Cultural Arts Committee
4 regular member vacancies (2 two-year terms and 2 one-year terms) and 2
alternate member vacancies (1 two-year term and 1 one-year term)
Council Member Genis nominated Irene P. Engard and Anthony S. Manrique for
a two-year term; and Tina Wlasick for a one-year term. (02:54:31)
MOTION: Approve
MOVEDISECOND: Council Member Genis/Council Member Leece
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis and Council Member Leece, Council Member
Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
• Historical Preservation Committee
6 regular member vacancies (5 two-year terms and 1 one-year term) and 2
alternates (2 two-year terms)
Council Member Leece nominated Christopher Ganeire, Mary Ellen Goddard,
Margaret Johnston, Terry Shaw, and Melinda Lowery to a two-year term; Karen
McKenna-Juergens to a one-year term; and George Nakai as an alternate.
(02:55:18)
MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Leece/Council Member Genis
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis and Council Member Leece, Council Member
Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Minutes -- Regular Meeting — April 1, 2014 - Page 8
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
• Housing and Public Service Grant Committee
3 regular member vacancies — this reduces the committee membership to 9
regular members (3 two-year terms)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger nominated Leah Ersoylu, Philip Morello and Bob
Wakeham for a two-year term. (02:56:08)
MOVED/SECOND: Mayor Pro Tem MensingerlCouncil Member Monahan
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis and Council Member Leece, Council Member
Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
• Costa Mesa Senior Corporation Board of Directors
2 representative vacancies (2 one-year terms)
Council Member Leece nominated James R. Fisler and Susan Healey for a one-
year term to the Costa Mesa Senior Corporation Board of Directors (02:56:38)
MOVEDISECOND: Council Member Leece/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis and Council Member Leece, Council Member
Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (02:57:47)
4. BUS SHELTER ADVERTISING FRANCHISE AGREEMENT (02:57:56)
Eleanor Egan, Costa Mesa, spoke on a non-discrimination provision. (02:58:45)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, spoke on non-discrimination and free speech.
(02:59:48)
Council Member Leece requested the addition of a nondiscrimination clause.
(03:00:25)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — April 1, 2014 - Page 9
Discussion ensued regarding approval of advertisements and the City's right to
reject advertisement that is improper, offensive, or interferes with pedestrian or
traffic safety. (03:01:38)
MOTION: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (03:03:10)
Council Member Leece spoke on free speech for advertising and indicated that
discretion should be with the City. (03:03:15)
MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem
Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 4-1
ACTION:
1. City Council approved a new Franchise Agreement for a Bus Shelter
Advertising Program, effective April 2, 2014 through March 31, 2019, with
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., 19320 Harborgate Way, Torrance, CA 90501;
and
2. Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Franchise Agreement.
6. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF COSTA MESA TO ENTER INTO
AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX
BOARD AUTHORIZING THE RECIPROCAL AND CONFIDENTIAL EXCHANGE
OF TAX DATA IN THE CITY BUSINESS TAX PROGRAM (03:06:44)
MOTION: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
Discussion ensued regarding the cost of the agreement. (03:07:15)
MOTION: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis and Council Member Leece, Council Member
Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- April 1, 2014 - Page 10
ACTION:
City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-17, to be read by title only and waived
further reading, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to execute the State of
California Standard Agreement C1300129 with the State of California Franchise
Tax Board to participate in the City Business Tax Program.
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS - NONE
COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS ON CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS - NONE
REPORT — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE
ADJOURNMENT - To Special City Council meeting, April 22, 2014, 7:00 p.m.
The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 9:12 p,m.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
Minutes -- Regular Meeting — April 1, 2014 - Page 11
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COSTA MESA CITY COUNCIL, AND
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MAY 6, 2014
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the Mayor at 4:02 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Costa
Mesa City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, California.
ROLL CALL
Council Members Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (arrived at 4:15 p.m.),
Council Member Leece, Council Member Genis and Council Member
Monahan
Council Members Absent: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS - None
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council recessed into closed session at 4:05 p.m. to consider the following items:
1. Conference with Thomas R. Hatch, Chief Executive Officer, and Labor Negotiator, Agency
Negotiator regarding Employee Organization: Costa Mesa Police Officers Association
(CMPOA), pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6.
2. Conference with Thomas R. Hatch, Chief Executive Officer, and Labor Negotiator, Agency
Negotiator regarding Employee Organization: Costa Mesa City Employee Association
(CMCEA), pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6.
3. Conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: Costa Mesa Employees
Association v. City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation, et al., Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 30-2011 00475281, pursuant to California Government Code Section
54956.9(a).
Mayor Righeimer and Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger recused themselves from Closed Session
item number 1.
The City Council reconvened at 6:03 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER (00:00:20)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (00:00:41) -- Mayor Righeimer
MOMENT OF SOLEMN EXPRESSION (00:01:16)
Rabbi Elie Spitz of Congregation B'nai Israel
Minutes — Regular Meeting — May 6, 2014 - Page 1
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
ROLL CALL (00:01:30)
Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council Member Leece, Council
Member Genis and Council Member Monahan.
Absent: None
Officials Present: Chief Executive Officer Thomas R. Hatch, City Attorney Thomas Duarte,
Assistant Chief Executive Officer Rick Francis, Assistant Chief Executive Officer/Administrative
Services Director Tamara Letourneau, Economic and Development Services Director Gary
Armstrong, Public Services Director Ernesto Munoz, and City Clerk Brenda Green.
CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT (00:01:45) - NONE
• COIN: Ex Parte Communications pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2-238 (b) - None
ANNOUNCEMENTS (00:02:00)
"Costa Mesa Minute" was played featuring upcoming events and activities in the community.
PRESENTATION (00:04:14)
1. Rabbi Elie Spitz of Congregation B'nai Israel on the Day of Holocaust Remembrance
(00:04:24)
2. New Ambulance Presentation (00:08:54)
3. Provide a Ride Presentation (00:14:30)
4. Recognition of St. John the Baptist School Clover Choir and Music Director Yvette Itano
(00:22:30)
PUBLIC COMMENTS (00:37:32)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, spoke on the fire fighters assistance for burn victims; and new
ambulances. (00:37:48)
Phillip Marx, Costa Mesa, spoke on radiation poisoning. (00:40:05)
Sue Lester, Costa Mesa, spoke on the OC Marathon; and on life saving efforts from Officer Olin.
(00:43:15)
Al Melone, Costa Mesa, spoke on the dog park. (00:45:30)
Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, spoke on the Military Affairs Team support of 115 Marines; the 60th
Anniversary report; and the 19th Street traffic calming meeting. (00:48:48)
Charles Mooney, Costa Mesa, spoke on library renovations. (00:51:50)
Minutes -- Regular Meeting — May 6, 2014 - Page 2
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Laurene Keane, Costa Mesa, spoke on the 60th Anniversary issue; and the Costa Mesa minute
video. (00:53:27)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, spoke on the Mayor's responsibility and public sentiment on various
Issues. (00:56:31)
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, spoke on the comment period for public speakers; and the 2012
elections. (00:59:55)
Cindy Black, Costa Mesa, spoke on approved developments; traffic mitigation for the Banning
Ranch development; and donations to Mayor Righeimer. (01:02:35)
Harold Weitzberg, Costa Mesa, spoke on infringement of rights. (01:05:44)
COUNCIL MEMBER' REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS (01:07:10)
Mayor Righeimer — spoke on new ambulances; the Fire Department reorganization; and
thanked citizens of Costa Mesa who paid for the fire services. (01:07:12)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger — spoke on the new ambulances; the leadership of the Fire
Department; announced the Mayor's celebration on May 8th, 2014; spoke on the OC Marathon
event and the Battle of Costa Mesa event; Costa Mesa Connect system for iPhones; dog park
maintenance; developments in the City; and the COIN process being considered by the County.
(01:11:32)
Council Member Genis — thanked St. John the Baptist School Choir; reported her attendance all
the Southern California Association of Governments conference; spoke on funding for
transportation; spoke on toll lanes; spoke on Consent Calendar 4; spoke on development fees;
development of long narrow single parcels; and the Metro Point development. (01:19:28)
Council Member Leece — spoke on the dog park; spoke on the 60th Anniversary report; the RFP
for expanding library services; reported her attendance at the Art Fair at Estancia Adobe; spoke
on the Moment of Solemn Expression; spoke on the General Plan Update; COIN; transparency;
and ex -parte communications. (01:25:10)
Council Member Monahan — spoke on the Moment of Solemn Expression; the dog park and
planting trees; neighborhood clean-up and removing old signs; and invited the public to
fundraiser events for St. Joachim and Kaiser Woodland School. (01:35:25)
REPORT- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) (01:38:50)
CEO Thomas Hatch provided a report on the 60th Anniversary event; spoke on the dog park; the
budget process; an Elections Committee; complemented public services staff on cleaning up of
trees after the winds; spoke on the Hamilton Community Garden; and the lease agreement
between the County and Ganahl Lumber Company.
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- May 6, 2014 - Page 3
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
CONSENT CALENDAR (00:55:52)
MOTION: Approve recommended actions for Consent Calendar Items Nos. 1-5 except for items
4 and 5.
MOVEDISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro
Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
1. PROCEDURAL WAIVER: MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE ONLY OF
ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
THAT APPEAR ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND
FURTHER READING WAIVED
ACTION:
City Council waived reading in full of Ordinances and Resolutions and approval and
adoption of same by reading title only.
2. READING FOLDER
a. Claims received by the City Clerk: Godoy Glad; Lou Jean Stead; Julie Fowler; and
Southern California Edison.
ACTION: Received and filed.
3. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2514: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, INCLUDING PAYROLL REGISTER NOS. 14-07 "A", 14-08,14-08 "A", 14-
09 AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE PAID,
funding Payroll No. 14-07 "A" for $3,367.93, Payroll No. 14-08 for $2,154,038.99,
Payroll No. 14-08 "A" for $1,358.07, Payroll No. 14-09 for $2,048,020.85 and City
operating expenses for $4,023,608.96.
ACTION: Approved Warrant Resolution No. 2514, to be read by title only and further
reading waived.
PUBLIC HEARINGS — 7;00 p.m. (Resolution No. 05-55) (01:45:05)
City Council considered Public Hearing item number 2 first followed by Public Hearing item
number 1.
2. 2014-2015 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK. GRANT PUBLIC SERVICE GRANT
ALLOCATIONS (01:42:26)
Mayor Righeimer recused himself from this item because he is on the Board of Mercy
House.
Minutes -- Regular Meeting — May 6, 2014 - Page 4
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Public Comments:
Kathy Duvernet, Youth Employment Service, Costa Mesa, thanked the city for support;
requested continued funding; and spoke on their programs. (01:50:40)
Timothy Huyah, Mercy House Living Centers, Costa Mesa, spoke regarding
homelessness and requested continued funding. (01:53:15)
John Hobso, Youth Employment Service, Costa Mesa, thanked the city for support and
requested continued funding. (01:54:30)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, and
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger.
Nays: None
Absent: None
Recused: Mayor Righeimer
Motion carried: 4-0-1
ACTION:
City Council approved a $20,000 Community Development Block Grant Public Service
Grants for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 for Mercy House.
Mayor Righeimer returned to the meeting. (01:57.30)
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Counci
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece,
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
Member Genis
Council Member Monahan, and
City Council approved the following Community Development Block Grant Public Service
Grants for Fiscal Year 2014-2015: Fair Housing Foundation $21,000; Community
SeniorSery-Home Delivered Meals $20,000; Youth Employment Services $19,000;
Council on Aging $9,000; Women's Transitional Living Center $10,000; Colette's
Children's Home $20,000; and Community SeniorServ-Congregte Meals $20,000.
Minutes — Regular Meeting — May 6, 2014 - Page 5
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
1. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ACT OF
ENTITLEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (01:58:15)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Council Member Leece
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
1. City Council approved recommended allocation of $1,031,757 for the Fiscal Year
2014-2015 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application; and
2. Approved recommended allocation of $353,421 for the Fiscal Year 2014-2015
HOME Investment Partnership Grant; and
3. Approved Resolution No. 14-21, to be read by title only and waived further reading,
authorizing the following:
o City's Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to act as the official representative of the City in
order to submit the Annual Action Plan and all certifications and assurances
contained therein; and
o CEO to act in connection with the submission of the Annual Action Plan; and
o CEO to approve minor changes and provide additional information as may be
required.
City Council recessed into a break at 8:21 p.m. (02:18:22)
City Council resumed at 8:31 p.m. (02:29:04)
Minutes — Regular Meeting - May 6, 2014 - Page 6
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
3. 125 EAST BAKER STREET APARTMENT PROJECT:
FINAL EIR (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2013081051); GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT GP -13-02; REZONE R-13-02; ZONING CODE AMENDMENT CO -13-02;
MASTER PLAN PA -13-11, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DA -14-02 (02:29:01)
Staff report presented by Mel Lee, Senior Planner and Jerry Guarracino, Assistant
Director Community Improvement Division.
Joe Flanagan, Applicant, Red Oak Investments, and the design team provided a
presentation. (03:21:20)
Public Comments:
Alex Remo, Irvine, spoke in support of the project. (04:16:30)
John Harty, Newport Beach, spoke in support of the project. (04:19:40)
Michael Garz, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project.. (04:21:34)
Anne Lukas, Tustin, spoke in opposition to the project. (04:22:44)
Morgan Hill, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project. (04:25.23)
Garry Lukas, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to the project. (04:27:00)
Sam Olmstead, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project. (04:28:20)
John Feeney, Costa Mesa, expressed concerns with the project. (04:30:14)
Carter Harrington, Costa Mesa, spoke in support of the project. (04:31:34)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, expressed concerns with the project. (04:32:22)
Richard Huffman, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to the project. (04:35:30)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, expressed concerns with the project. (04:38:05)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to the project. (04:41:12)
Cynthia McDonald, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to the project. (04:44:08)
1. MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, and
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger and Mayor Rig heimer.
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
Minutes — Regular Meeting — May 6, 2014 - Page 7
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
ACTION:
1. City Council approved Resolution No. 14-22, to be read by title only and waived further
reading, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the project.
2. MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (05:25:30)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, and Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 4-1
ACTION:
2. City Council tentatively approved by adoption of Resolution No. 14-23, to be read by title
only and waived further reading, General Plan Amendment GP -13-02, with substituting
4 stories and a loft instead of 5 stories.
3. MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (05:34:10)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan,
and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 4-1
ACTION:
and Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
3. City Council approved first reading to Ordinance No. 14-05, to be read by title only and
waived further reading, approving Rezone R-13-02.
4. MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (05:34:30)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, and Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 4-1
ACTION:
4. City Council approved first reading to Ordinance No. 14-06, to be read by title only and
waived further reading, approving Zoning Code Amendment CO -13-02
Minutes — Regular Meeting -- May 6, 2014 - Page 8
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
5. MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (05:34:40)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, and Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 4-1
5. City Council approved by adoption of Resolution No. 14-24, to be read by title only and
waived further reading, Master Plan PA -13-11, subject to conditions of approval and the
EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project.
6. MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (05:35:05)
SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER GENTS: To approve the development
agreement except for clause six. (05:39:35)
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND
ORIGINAL MOTION: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (05:40:28)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, and Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 4-1
ACTION:
6. City Council approved Development Agreement DA -14-02 between the applicant and
the City of Costa Mesa to fund public infrastructure improvements in the area.
City Council recessed for a break at 11:43 p.m. (05:40:50)
City Council resumed at 11:54 p.m. (05:50:25)
MOTION: Continue the meeting past midnight
MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Leece/Council Member Monahan
The motion to continue the meeting past midnight carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: None
Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger/Council Member Genis
Motion carried: 3-2
Minutes — Regular Meeting — May 6, 2014 - Page 9
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
NEW BUSINESS (05:50:50)
1. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 FOR A BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA
COVERING CERTAIN COSTA MESA HOTELS AND MOTELS AND SETTING THE
TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSAL (05:50:59)
MOTIONIMOVED: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (05:57:10)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, and
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
1. City Council received and filed the Business Improvement Area (BIA) annual report
for Fiscal Year 2013-14; and
2. Received and filed audited financial report for Fiscal Year 2012-13; and
3. Approved Resolution No. 14-25, to be read by title only and waived further reading,
declaring its intention to levy an annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 for a
Business Improvement Area covering certain Costa Mesa Hotels and Motels and
setting the time and place for a public hearing on June 3, 2014.
2. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL DIRECTION ON POTENTIAL REVIEWIREVISION OF
THE CITY'S SIGN ORDINANCE (06:00:15)
John Feeney, Costa Mesa, spoke on the current sign code. (06:01:40)
City Council provided direction to staff to refer to the Planning Commission. (06:05:20)
3. ETHICS POLICY (06:11:26)
Sue Lester, Costa Mesa, spoke on compliance of the ethics policy. (06:15:00)
Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, spoke on enforcement and compliance of the policy.
(06:17:00)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, inquired on a hearing or appeal process for censure.
(06:20:10)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, spoke on compliance of the ethics policy. (06:20:45)
MOTION: To receive and file. (06:28:40)
Minutes — Regular Meeting — May 6, 2014 - Page 10
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MOVED/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Monahan, and Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
and Mayor Righeimer,
Nays: Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 4-1
ACTION:
City Council received and filed the ethics policy.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR —
4.
5.
2013 ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE COSTA MESA 2002 GENERAL PLAN (06:37:35)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, spoke regarding mobile homes being sold and replaced with
high density housing. (06:37:50)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, commented on various sections of the general plan review.
(06:40:08)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger (06:43:19)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, and
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
City Council approved the 2013 Annual Report of the Costa Mesa 2002 General Plan.
CHANGE ORDER — WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. (06:43:49)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, spoke on outsourcing of tree trimmings. (06:43:58)
MOTION: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger and Mayor Righeimer.
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
Mensinger (06:44:50)
Council Member Monahan, and
Minutes — Regular Meeting — May 6, 2014 - Page 11
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
ACTION:
1. City Council approved Contract Change Order No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement authorizing payment for additional work in the amount of $100,000 for
tree planting services with West Coast Arborists, Inc., 2200 E. Via Burton Street,
Anaheim, California 92806; and
2. Authorized the CEO to execute the Contract Change Order.
CONTINUTED PUBLIC COMMENTS (06:46:55)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, spoke on the 60th Anniversary documents; and the ethics policy.
(06;47:17)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on ambulance transportation; the Metro Point development;
the Auto Club and IKEA development; and General Plan Amendments. (06:48:51)
COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS ON CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS - NONE
REPORT — CITY ATTORNEY - NONE
ADJOURNMENT- To next regular meeting on June 3, 2014.
The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 12:37 p.m.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
Minutes — Regular Meeting — May 6, 2014 - Page 12
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COSTA MESA CITY COUNCIL,
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING AND SPECIAL
JOINT MEETING WITH THE COSTA MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY
January 7, 2014
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the Mayor at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Costa
Mesa City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, California.
ROLL CALL
Council Members Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council Member
Leece, Council Member Genis and Council Member Monahan
Council Members Absent: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
CLOSED SESSION
The City Council recessed into Closed Session at 5:03 p.m. to consider the following items:
1. Conference with Thomas R. Hatch, Chief Executive Officer, and Labor Negotiator, Agency
Negotiator regarding Employee Organization: Costa Mesa City Employee Association
(CMCEA), pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6.
2. Conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: Costa Mesa Employees
Association v. City of Costa Mesa, a municipal corporation, et al., Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 302011 00475281, pursuant to California Government Code Section
54956.9(a).
3. Conference with legal counsel regarding existing litigation: City of Costa Mesa v. D'Alessio
Investments, LLC, a Nevada Corporation; et al.: Orange County Superior Court Case No.
30-2011-00468876, pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(a).
The City Council reconvened at 6:05 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER (00:00:10)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (00:00:39) — Council Member Genis
MOMENT OF SOLEMN EXPRESSION (00:01:00) - NONE
ROLL CALL (00:01:11)
Present: Mayor Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, Council Member Leece, Council
Member Genis and Council Member Monahan.
Absent: None
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 1
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Officials Present: Chief Executive Officer Thomas R. Hatch, City Attorney Thomas Duarte,
Assistant Chief Executive Officer Rick Francis, Economic and Development Services Director
Gary Armstrong, Public Services Director Ernesto Munoz, and City Clerk Brenda Green.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT (00:01:25) - NONE
• COIN: Ex Parte Communications pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2-238 (b) - None
ANNOUNCEMENTS (00:01:30)
"Costa Mesa Minute" was played featuring upcoming events and activities in the community.
PRESENTATIONS (00:03:14)
Sandra Dunkin, Orange County Grand Jury, announced openings for the Orange County Grand
Jury; and explained the selection process to become a member. (00:03:37)
Dr. Kathy Simon Abels, Simon Family Foundation, President/Executive Director, provided a
video presentation on the Simon Scholar Program. (00:05:00)
Frank Albers, President, Costa Mesa High School Foundation, provided an update on the
Foundation's mission and a summary of completed projects. (00:11:40)
PUBLIC COMMENTS (00:16:00)
Christine Nolf, Costa Mesa, expressed support for the permanent Supportive Housing Project.
(00:16:44)
Tamar Goldman, Costa Mesa, spoke on public input at General Plan Study Sessions. (00:17:27)
Martin H. Millard, Costa Mesa, spoke on the repair of the trail at Fairview Park. (00:19:00)
Larry Haynes, Costa Mesa, Executive Director of Mercy House, spoke on the Supportive
Housing Project. (00:21:00)
Cindy Brennaman, Costa Mesa, apologized; and spoke on an article on the Illumination
Foundation. (00:23:23)
Brenda Springer, Costa Mesa, expressed support for the Supportive Housing project; and
indicated opposition for the Supportive Housing Project at Civic Center Park. (00:24:35)
Sue Lester, Costa Mesa, commended Cindy Brenneman for apologizing; commended the PD
on the 60th anniversary event; commended the Fire Department on Santa letters; thanked city
staff for rearranging the tree trimming schedule during the holiday's; spoke on police staffing at
Council meetings; and the Costa Mesa United Golf Tournament. (00:26:55)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on the Police Department staffing levels. (00:30:25)
Anna McCarthy, Costa Mesa, spoke in opposition to a permanent Supportive Housing Project at
Civic Center Park. (00:30:50)
Minutes -- Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting -- January 7, 2014 - Page 2
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Beth Rafakes, Costa Mesa, spoke on civility at Council meetings; requested an update on the
status of the audio/visual upgrades; spoke on a Veteran's hall; and the Supportive Housing
Project. (00:34:34)
Mark Guitierrez, Costa Mesa, spoke on his aspirations to be a public servant; shared on being
homeless; and supports the Supportive Housing proposal. (00:37:45)
COUNCIL MEMBER' REPORTS, COMMENTS, AND SUGGESTIONS (00:40:04)
Council Member Genis spoke on cancelling the first meeting in January instead of the second
meeting in December due to the holiday's; reported her attendance at the So Cal Summit on
Recovery Economy in December; and spoke regarding civility at the meetings. (00:40:20)
Council Member Leece spoke on the Supportive Housing Project at Civic Center Park; volunteer
opportunities to help the homeless; thanked staff and volunteers for Snoopy House; thanked
families who hosted Marines; spoke on the Open House at the Police Department; asked for
clarification on Vanguard's soccer fields; spoke on the upcoming General Plan: Visioning
Statements meeting; spoke on South Coast Plaza taxable sales reporting; and announced the
Costa Mesa business assistance guide for new businesses; and wished everyone a Happy New
Year. (00:42:55)
Council Member Monahan — None (00:49:12)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on the Supportive Housing Project; best practices on helping the
homeless; civility at meetings; supporting the Marines and hosting families for Christmas.
(00:49:15)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger spoke on the Supportive Housing Project; the opportunities of the
Simon Scholar Program; the Costa Mesa walking group; and the Costa Mesa Golf Tournament.
(00:58:23)
REPORT -- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) (01:01:33)
CEO Hatch spoke on the Snoopy House event; Costa Mesa School District Summer Arts
Program; staffing and recruitment at City Hall; using additional resources to. augment vacancies;
Costa Mesa High School Cheer Program; congratulated AVM Professional Volleyball players
April Ross and Jake Gibb; spoke on the soccer field impacts at Vanguard University; spoke on
the upcoming General Plan meetings; and the Senior Center organizational review findings.
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 W Page 3
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
CONSENT CALENDAR (01:11:05)
MOTION: Approve recommended actions for Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 through 17 except
for Items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, and 14.
MOVED/SECOND: Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger/Council Member Genis
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro
Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
1. PROCEDURAL WAIVER: MOTION TO APPROVE THE READING BY TITLE ONLY OF
ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. SAID ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
THAT APPEAR ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA SHALL BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND
FURTHER READING WAIVED
ACTION: City Council waived reading in full of Ordinances and Resolutions and approval
and adoption of same by reading title only.
2. READING FOLDER
a. Claims received by the City Clerk: Akil Carter; and Hooshang Pakfar.
ACTION: Received and filed.
11. REFUND OF CASH DEPOSIT IN CONNECTION WITH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
NO. PS12-00154 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT 2059 HARBOR BLVD, COSTA
MESA, CALIFORNIA
ACTION: City Council approved the refund of cash deposit in connection with
Encroachment Permit No. PS12-00154 in the amount of $26,937, to West Coast Self
Storage Group LLC, 4012 148th St SE Mill Creek, WA 98012.
12, STREETSCAPE AND MEDIAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
ACTION: City Council authorized staff to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) to secure
consultant services to assist in revising the Streetscape and Median Development
Standards.
15. PURCHASE OF MICROSOFT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL 2013 LICENSES THROUGH
THE MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT
ACTION: City Council approved the purchase of Microsoft Office Professional Plus
licenses through the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) Program for 448 desktop
computers from CompuCom Systems in the amount of $181,690.88. This amount will be
payable in two equal payments of $90,845.44, with the first payment due in January 2014
(FY 1314) and the second payment due in July 2014 (FY 14-15).
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 4
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
16. MINUTES: Regular Meeting of November 5, 2013; Special Study Session of
November 12, 2013; Regular Study Session of November 12, 2013; and Regular
Meeting/Special Joint Meeting with the Costa Mesa Housing Authority of November 19,
2013.
ACTION: Approved.
17. PROPOSED TRANSFER OF GENERAL PARTNER OF 72 -UNIT COSTA MESA
FAMILY VILLAGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT - REQUEST TO CMHA, AS
GROUND LESSOR, FROM SHAPELL, AS GENERAL PARTNER OF GROUND
LESSEE, FOR CONSENT TO TRANSFER GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST IN
LESSEE UNDER THREE GROUND LEASES AND RELATED INSTRUMENTS TO
WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF SHAPELL
ACTION: City Council authorized CMHA Executive Director to sign the Consent Letter
substantially in the form attached and return it to Shapell.
PUBLIC HEARINGS -- 7:00 p.m. (Resolution No. 0555)
1. PA -89-36 A21PA-87-133 Al (ZA-13-22) AMENDMENT TO PLANNED SIGN
PROGRAMS FOR METRO POINTE OFFICE AND RETAIL CENTER 901 SOUTH
COAST DRIVE & 950 SOUTH COAST DRIVE (01:12:30)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger recused himself and left the Council Chambers.
Staff report provided by Antonio Gardea, Senior Planner. (01:13:00)
Council Member Genis spoke on current visibility of area by neighboring residences;
concern on number of signage and placement of signs; reducing sign size and impacts
on neighboring residences; indicated concern with precedent set with LED lighting;
and demonstrated pictures of the site. (01:14:30)
Speaker, General Manager, Metro Pointe, spoke on competing shopping centers;
keeping sales tax in Costa Mesa; signage opportunities for small businesses; and sign
designs. (01:23:00)
Peter Nagavi, Representative on behalf of Applicant, spoke on the history of
Development of Metro Pointe; mitigating traffic impacts; building a successful
development; building a new freeway off ramp; the need to revisit LED signage; LED
signage being a helpful tool for businesses; indicated that there is no significant impact to
neighboring residences; and spoke on the SOCO signage. (01:26:00)
Discussion ensued regarding the signage height at the top of the Edward Cinema sign.
(01:36:20)
Milton Solomon, spoke on the visibility of the signs; impacts to neighborhoods; and the
size of the sign. (01:37:00)
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 5
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Discussion ensued on the height of the sign; impacts to residents; advertisement
capability; and notices sent to property owners. (01:38:00)
Sheila Pffaflin, Costa Mesa, concerned with the signage being approved by a variance.
(01:48:50)
Mark Harris, Costa Mesa, indicated that he spoke to Mr. Solomon regarding the proposed
signage; spoke on the different levels of LED lighting; and impacts to his neighborhood.
(01:49:47)
Tom Pollitt, Costa Mesa, indicated that he is not opposed to the signage; and would like
the development to be more competitive.(01:54:20)
Cynthia Blackwell, Costa Mesa, spoke on traffic impacts on South Coast Drive; and
expressed support on advertising signs. (01:57:25)
Flo Martin, Costa Mesa, spoke on civility; light pollution on the North side of Costa Mesa;
spoke in opposition to LED signage; and indicated that the focus should be on residents
concerns. (01:59:20)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on LED signs; visibility of signs; and asked to require
developer to come back with better pictures that demonstrate visibility and impacts to
residents. (02:02:27)
Greg Ridge, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the recommended signage; and spoke
on the vote from the Planning Commission. (02:05:04)
Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, opposed to the signage; spoke on neighborhood impacts due
to light spillage and light signage. (02:07:05)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, inquired on the neighborhood impacts; and expressed
concern on safety due to many signs at SOCO. (02:10:00)
Discussion ensued on impacts to neighbors, the need to look at sign policies for future
LED lighting. (02:13:10)
MOTION: To Uphold the Planning Commission's decision
Motion died for lack of a second.
Discussion ensued on reader boards and LED billboards; larger signs on the north side of
building; and advertising Costa Mesa events. (02:15:50)
Mayor Righeimer indicated that he would like changes to what the Planning Commission
approved; expressed concern on signage becoming billboards and V party
advertisement; and reviewed what was allowed at SOCO. (02:25:10)
MOTION/SECOND: Mayor Righeimer/Council Member Genis
Council Member Genis and Leece indicated concern on the impacts on the
neighborhoods. (02:36:10)
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting -- January 7, 2014 - Page 6
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Council Member Leece requested that Planning look at sign policy standards.
(02:36:35)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, and
Mayor Righeimer
Noes: None
Recused: Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
Absent: None s
Motion carried: 4-0-1
ACTION:
City Council upheld the Planning Commission's decision approving the project, with the
following changes and additions: Pylon signs facing the freeway will not exceed 40' in
height, including all decorative elements of the signs; The content of the LED signs shall be
strictly limited to the names and logos of businesses located on -premises; provided that
applicants may substitute text or logos with noncommunicative decorative elements,
including but not limited to, lifestyle photographs. "On -premises" shall mean that the
business is located on the Metro Pointe site only, and does not include any use or business
that operates for less than ninety consecutive (90) days. LED text shall not include, for
example, information regarding short-term tenants (90 days or less), sales, specials, events,
or any off -premises advertising. The height of the directional sign on the north side of South
Coast Drive shall not exceed 7 feet from grade.
A recess was taken at 8:45 p.m.
The meeting resumed at 8:55 p.m.
OLD BUSINESS (02:48:88)
1. SECOND READING OF THE EXCESSIVE USE OF RESOURCES ORDINANCE: "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
ADDING CHAPTER VI (COST RECOVERY FOR EXCESSIVE USE OF RESOURCES
DUE TO NUISANCE ACTIVITIES AT LODGING ESTABLISHMENTS) OF TITLE 14
(POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING COST RECOVERY FOR EXCESSIVE USE OF POLICE SERVICES".
Staff report provided by Rick Francis, Assistant CEO, reviewing the threshold on calls for
service; meeting with hotel owners; the revisions of the proposed Ordinance; cost
methodology; 911 calls; and increased tolls. (02:48:30)
Mayor Righeimer announced meetings between Council Members and hotel/motel owners.
(02:52:40)
Elena Gerli, Deputy City Attorney, indicated that the City does have the authority to issue
specific regulations to address. problems. (02:54:11)
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 7
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Discussion ensued defining excessive use of calls from hotels; land lord and tenant
issues; a flat fee; the proposed Resolution; adjusting the ratio allotment; inspection of
rooms by management; hotel calls; economic analysis of room establishments; and
nuisance code at lodging establishments. (02:56:45)
Laurie Dickendasher, Regency Inn, expressed concern on interpreting words in the
Ordinance; and indicated that she would like to have a good relationship with the City.
(03:15:20)
Chris McEvoy, spoke on patrolling hotels; and inquired on two group meetings on this
item. (03:20:00)
Mike Lim, Costa Mesa, agreed against criminal activity; spoke on the hotel call threshold.
(03:20:55)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, spoke on attorney costs; and the TOT tax. (03:24:32)
Lili Graham, Attorney, Public Law Center, expressed opposition to the Ordinance.
(03:24:32)
Mayor Righeimer clarified that domestic and child abuse does not count towards the
calls. (03:29:00)
Jack Chen, Harbor Inn, spoke on the 1995 safe innskeeper program for crime prevention;
and asked for this item to be tabled. (03:29:30)
Heather Johnson, ACLU, expressed opposition to the Ordinance. (03:31:50)
Jean Forbath, Costa Mesa, Member of Costa Mesa Housing Coalition, expressed
opposition to the Ordinance. (03:34:50)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on safety and lawsuits; and expressed concern with the
Ordinance. (03:37:00)
Wilson Wayne, President of Taiwan Hotel/Motel Association of Southern California,
expressed opposition to the Ordinance. (03:40:00)
Jay Humphrey, Costa Mesa, expressed concern with the Ordinance. (03:43:15)
Hector Almaraz, General Manager, Costa Mesa Motor Inn, expressed opposition to the
Ordinance. (03:46:22)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the Ordinance. (03:48:30)
Speaker, Costa Mesa Motor Inn, expressed concern with the Ordinance. (03:50:50)
Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, expressed concern with the Ordinance; suggested an
educational program on best business practices; and does not agree with the threshold
amount. (03:54:24)
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 8
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Lily Chen, Attorney, Regency Inn & New Harbor Inn, spoke on comments from the
Mayor; fines; and long term occupancy. (03:57:25)
Flo Martin, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the Ordinance. (04:01:00)
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the Ordinance. (04:03:40)
Cindy Brenneman, Costa Mesa, expressed opposition to the Ordinance. (04:07:00)
Discussion ensued on processing fines; keeping track of calls; cooperation from owners;
calls for service at hotels; activities defined under disturbing the peace; illegal use of
fireworks; and issues at motels. (04:08:00)
MOTIONISECOND: Mayor Righeimer/Council Member Monahan (04:26:20)
Mayor Righeimer spoke on nuisance activity at hotels; better hotel management; and
charges for excessive use of resources. (04:26:30)
Council Member Monahan spoke on the nuisance activities identified in the Ordinance
including: the occurrence or attempted occurrence of any gang related crime; unlawfully
discharging of firearms; parties or gatherings in which alcohol or control substances are
consumed illegally by minors; the occurrence or attempted occurrence of any criminal
activity that threatens the life, health, safety or welfare of residents of the lodging
establishment, the neighborhood or the public; the commission or attempted commission
of any serious felony or violent felony; the manufacture, cultivation, sale, use or
possession of a controlled substance; the commission or attempted commission of any
act of prostitution; and the manufacture, sale, possession, or use of a firearm in violation
of the Dangerous Weapons Control Law. (04:34:50)
Council Member Leece stated that she will not be supporting the motion; and spoke on
working with business owners. (04:38:35)
Council Member Genis stated that she does not support the Ordinance; and stated that
she would like the record to reflect, "I certainly do believe that we should not allow
businesses to externalize their cost on to the community however, in this case I would
like the record to reflect that I have not seen data to indicate that the motels are
problematic as opposed to other businesses despite my request to see such data
which I would also like the record to reflect that". (04:40:05)
Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger spoke on problem motels; and stated that he would like the
record to reflect, "in contrary to what one of the speakers said I would rather not see
drug and prostitution in motel rooms, that is not a goal of our City. Nor do we want to
perpetuate that. This is about trying to eliminate crime, and the lower the crime rate the
less government we need, we do not need to hire more police so that we can manage
somebody's business". (04:41:35)
Council Member Monahan spoke on collaborating with business owners. (04:42:25)
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 9
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Monahan, Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece
Absent: None
Motion carried: 3-2
NEW BUSINESS - NONE
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (04:43:36)
3. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2502: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE
PAID, funding City operating expenses for $644,278.01.
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, spoke on the Senior Center audit; Charter Committee
costs; and legal fees. (04:44:15)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, spoke on excessive expenditures and attorney costs.
(04:46:50)
MOTION/SECOND: Mayor Righeimer/Council Member Leece (04:49:30)
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: Approved Warrant Resolution No. 2502, to be read by title only and further
reading waived.
4. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2503. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, INCLUDING PAYROLL REGISTER NO. 13-24 "A" AND 13-25 AND
SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE PAID, funding
Payroll No. 13-24 "A" for $720.78, Payroll No. 13-25 for $2,269,045.92 and City
operating expenses for $964,749.23. (04:49:50)
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, spoke on excessive expenditures by outsourcing; Jones
Day costs; lawsuits; and Benito Acosta fees. (04:50:00)
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 10
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MOTION/SECOND: Mayor Righeimer/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: City Council approved Warrant Resolution No. 2503, to be read by title only
and further reading waived.
5. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2504: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE
PAID, funding City operating expenses for $948,972.90. (04:52:15)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, spoke on TOT tax and attorney costs. (04:52:28)
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, spoke on outsourcing of services. (04:55:15)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent. None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: Approved Warrant Resolution No. 2504, to be read by title only and further
reading waived.
6. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2505: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, INCLUDING PAYROLL REGISTER NO. 13-25 "A" AND 13-26 AND
SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE PAID, funding
Payroll No. 13-25 "A" for $0.00, Payroll No. 13-26 for $2,188,009.22 and City
operating expenses for $1,638,928.46. (04:57:03)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, spoke on Huntington Beach helicopter services;
Enterprise Council Group; Liebert Cassidy; Management Partners fees; and Jones Day
fees. (04:57:15)
Chris McEvoy, Costa Mesa, spoke on legal fees. (04:59:'15)
Tamar Goldmann, Costa Mesa, spoke on keeping track of employees; and the listening
report. (05:00:10)
MOTION/SECOND- Mayor Righeimer/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 11
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: Approved Warrant Resolution No. 2505, to be read by title only and further
reading waived.
7. WARRANT RESOLUTION 2506: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS, AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE
PAID, funding City operating expenses for $554,182.55. (05:01:40)
Anna Vrska, Costa Mesa, spoke on legal fees; asked for clarification on items; and spoke
on costs for the Charter Committee. (05:01:58)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, spoke on legal expenditures; Larry's building materials bill;
and decomposed granite. (05:04:10)
MOTIONISECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: Approved Warrant Resolution No. 2506, to be read by title only and further
reading waived.
8. FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 17501 LOCATED AT 1527 NEWPORT BOULEVARD,
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA (05:06:30)
Chris McEvoy, spoke on developments and density. 05:06:44
Sheila Pfafflin, Costa Mesa, spoke on high density housing; and is opposed to the item.
(05:07:30)
Shubeth Shoeman, Matt White Custom Homes, spoke on the project. (05:09:50)
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 12
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MOTION/SECOND: Mayor Righeimer/Council Member Monahan
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: City Council approved the Final Map for Tract No. 17501 and authorized
signing of the Map by the City Clerk and the City Engineer.
9. FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 17554 LOCATED AT 132, 134, & 140 INDUSTRIAL
WAY, COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA
MOTION/SECOND: Mayor Righeimer/Council Member Monahan
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: City Council approved the Final Map for Tract No. 17554 and authorized
signing of the Map by the City Clerk and the City Engineer.
10. FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 17519 LOCATED'AT 2157 AND 2159 TUSTIN AVENUE,
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA
MOTION/SECOND: Mayor Righeimer/Council Member Monahan
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: City Council approved the Final Map for Tract No. 17519 and authorized
signing of the Map by the City Clerk and the City Engineer.
13. HARBOR BOULEVARD AND ADAMS AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS —
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SUPPORT SERVICES
(05:10:30)
Greg Thunell, spoke against outsourcing. (05:10:50)
Jay Humprey, Costa Mesa, spoke on the traffic problem on Elm Avenue and Ponderosa
Street. (05:13:20)
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting -- January 7, 2014 - Page 13
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/Mayor Pro Tem Mensinger
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION:
1. City Council awarded a Professional Services Contract for an amount not to exceed
$192,400 to Onward Engineering, 300 South Harbor Boulevard, Suite 814, Anaheim,
CA 92805, for Construction Management and Inspection Support Services for the
Harbor Boulevard — Adams Avenue project; and
2. Authorized the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Professional Services
Agreement.
14. EXTENSION OF EXISTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR
INTERIM IT DIRECTOR AND IT CONSULTANT (05:16:59)
Anna Vrska, spoke on costs for consultants; and legal fees. (05:17:15)
MOTION/SECOND: Council Member Monahan/ Mayor Righeimer
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Genis, Council Member Leece, Council Member Monahan, Mayor
Pro Tem Mensinger, and Mayor Righeimer
Nays: None
Absent: None
Motion carried: 5-0
ACTION: City Council authorized the City CEO to extend the following existing
Professional Services Agreements by approving the following amendments:
1. Amendment One to the contract with NexLevel Information Technology, Inc.
(NexLevel IT) for Interim IT Director, in an amount not to exceed $55,000.00, for a
total contract amount of $104,920.00; and
2. Amendment Two to the contract with Scientia Consulting Group, Inc. (Scientia) for an
IT Consultant to assist with technical support functions, in an amount not to exceed
$55,000.00, for a total contract amount of $103,000.00.
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 14
UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS (05:20:00)
Chris McEvoy, Costa Mesa, spoke on vandalism costs at the park; right to speak at meetings;
and a June '14th, 2010 public hearing item. (05:20:25)
Susan Shaw, Costa Mesa, spoke in favor of solving the homeless issue; spoke on an issue
involving a City tree; and is opposed to splitting the public comment period. (05:23:22)
Speaker, spoke on comments made by the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem on hotel and motels; and
the warrants. (05:26:50)
Robin Leffler, Costa Mesa, spoke on the public comment period; and police staffing. (05:28:40)
Greg Thunell, Costa Mesa, spoke on bankruptcy; the City being understaffed; and attorney
costs. (05:32:00)
COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS ON CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS (05:35:05)
Council Member Leece spoke on warrant questions from the public; and on employees retiring
and going to other jobs. (05:35:08)
REPORT -- CITY ATTORNEY — None
ADJOURNMENT — To Special Joint Study Session with the Planning Commission,
January 14, 2014, 4:30 p.m. (05:35:15)
The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 11:41 p.m.
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
Minutes — Regular Meeting/Special Joint Meeting — January 7, 2014 - Page 15
Cl T Y COUNCIL A GENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2014
ITEM NUMBER: CC -6
SUBJECT: FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 17705 LOCATED AT 2294 PACIFIC AVENUE, COSTA
MESA, CALIFORNIA
DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2014
FROM: PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
PRESENTATION ERNESTO MUNOZ, PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR
BY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FARIBA FAZELI, CITY ENGINEER, AT 714-754-5335
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Final Map for Tract No. 17705 (Attachment 1), including the vacation of twenty-
five (25) foot of a thirty (30') foot -wide public utility easement and authorize signing of the
Map by the City Clerk and the City Engineer.
BACKGROUND:
The Tentative Map for Tract No. 17705 and Conditions of Approval (Attachment 2) were
approved by the Planning Commission on May 27, 2014. The Map consists of a
subdivision to construct a 5 -unit, two-story detached, small lot single-family residential
development on a 0.47 -acre parcel. The Map also includes the vacation of twenty-five (25)
foot of a thirty (30) foot -wide public utility easement along the northern boundary of the
property.
ANAI WRIS•
All Conditions of Approval imposed by the Planning Commission have been complied
with and the Final Map is in substantial conformance with the Tentative Map approved by
the Planning Commission. The Tract Map has been checked and found to be technically
correct, and includes the release and relinquishment of access rights to Pacific Avenue.
There is a thirty (30') foot -wide public utility easement along the northern boundary of the
property located at 2294 Pacific Avenue. A portion of this easement, twenty-five (25')
foot -wide, is being vacated in conjunction with the Tract Map No. 17705. The utility
easement was originally dedicated by a reservation from the right-of-way vacation of
Banning Place. However, there are no underground utilities or the need to construct a
public street within the reserved easement area. The only utility lines within the vicinity
of the easement are Southern California Edison's (SCE) above ground power poles.
Even though SCE's poles are outside of the easement area, the overhead cross arms are
encroaching into the easement. Therefore, SCE has indicated that they only need five
foot of the existing easement for maintenance purposes.
1
On October 27, 2014, a report was presented to the Planning Commission outlining the
location, purpose, and extent of the proposed vacation of the public utility easement as
required by Government Code Section 65402. The Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. PC -14-48 (Attachment 3) finding that the proposed vacation is consistent
with the City's General Plan.
Government Code Sections 66434(g) and 664450) authorize the vacation of twenty-five
(25) foot of the existing thirty (30') foot -wide public utility easement upon the filing of the
final map, provided written notation of the vacation is listed by reference to the record
creating the easement and certified by the City Clerk.
Public entities potentially interested in the easement were notified of the proposed
vacation. Southern California Edison was the only utility that requested reservation of a
five foot portion of the public utility easement.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
No alternatives were considered.
FISCAL REVIEW:
All Tract Map filing fees have been paid.
LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney's office is in agreement that the Map Act allows vacation of excess public
easements upon the filing of the Final Map in accordance with Government Code Sections
66434(g) and 664450).
CONCLUSION:
There is an existing thirty (30') foot -wide public utility easement along the northern
boundary of the property located at 2294 Pacific Avenue. SCE has indicated that they
only need five foot of the existing easement to access their facilities. There are no other
underground and/or above ground utilities within the easement and the City has no future
plans to construct a street in that area.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Final Map, vacate the excess twenty-
five (25) foot -wide public utility easement with the Map, and authorize the City Clerk and
the City Engineer to sign the Map.
FARIBA FAZELI
City Engineer
ATTACHMENTS
1 — Final Tract Map
2 — Letter of Conditions
3 — Resolution PC -14-48
ERNESTO MUNOZ
Public Services Director
2
Chief Executive Officer
DISTRIBUTION: Assistant Chief Executive Officer
Economic & Dev. Director/Deputy CEO
City Attorney
City Clerk
yTw ►1;jF _Cl T Y COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
i� �+ CITY �NF,ANTS A,� DATE:
T NOVEMBER 18,2014 ITEM NUMBER: CC -7
` �C�RPORR7E��9��/1
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR AN INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR 177 -UNIT LIVE/WORK AND RESIDENTIAL LOFT DEVELOPMENT
AT 671 W. 17TH STREET
DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2014
FROM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
PRESENTATION BY: MINOO ASHABI, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MINOO ASHABI, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
Minoo.ashabi@costamesaca.gov
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Award contract to PlaceWorks in the amount of $86,165.00 for preparation of the Initial
Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/ MND) for the proposed 177 -unit development
at 671 W. 17tH Street, authorize Mayor and City Clerk to sign and execute the contract,
and authorize CEO to sign extensions or renewals of the contract.
BACKGROUND
Proposed Project
On June 14, 2014, City Council conducted an Urban Master Plan screening of the
development concept for 176 units of live/work and loft units at Argotech Site. The
minutes of the screening can be accessed at the following link:
httD://www.costamesaca.aov/modules/showdocument.asax?documentid=15248
In August 2014, the proposed master plan and subdivision map for the project was
submitted to the City for processing. The plan has been slightly modified from the master
plan screening submittal and now includes one additional loft unit for a total of 177 units,
a lager common open space area and a detailed parking plan including 22 compact
parking spaces.
The 9 -acre site is zoned MG (General Industrial) and has a General Plan land use
designation of Light Industrial. The proposal three different products types as follows:
1. 89 units of three-story attached live/work lofts,
2. 46 units of three-story attached residential lofts, and
3. 42 units of three-story detached live/work units.
The site is currently occupied by Argotech (one of the largest industrial uses on
Westside) and is located within the Mesa West Bluffs Urban Plan. Argotech has been
1
undergoing extensive contamination clean up under state and county regulations. The
process is nearly complete and the applicant has obtained a Notification of Case
Closure Review from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).
Development of the site with residential product would require clearance from the state
as well as local agencies.
Future Discretionary Actions
The master plan and the IS/ MND will be subject to review and approval by the Planning
Commission. The preliminary plans indicate that approval of the following deviations will
be required for the proposed development plans:
• Parking — 15% compact stalls are proposed
• Garage size— 19' x 20' proposed (20' x 20' required)
• Workspace size — Workspaces range in size from 156 square feet to 270 square
feet for live/work units — 250 square feet required.
Request for Proposals and Consultant Qualification
On October 1, 2014, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was released to qualified consulting
firms to prepare the IS / MND. A total of eleven bids were received and approved for
review. Because of extensive experience in mixed use plans and recent involvement in
projects within neighboring cities, PlaceWorks was selected as the most competitive
consultant during the evaluation process. The Consultant will be responsible for the
preparation of the IS/ MND and all related CEQA related documents/studies (Notice of
Preparation, Responses to Comments, applicable studies, etc.). Attendance at Planning
Commission and City Council public hearings is also required.
Department staff believes that PlaceWorks is qualified to perform the work due to the
following considerations:
• Demonstrated relevant experience with residential and mixed-use development.
PlaceWorks is a multidisciplinary planning, environmental, and design firm offering
a wide range of in-house technical expertise. Specifically, PlaceWorks completed
the Visioning Plan and EIR for Irvine Business Complex and the EIR for Uptown
Newport including a mixed use project of residential and neighborhood retail and
park space in the Airport Business Area.
• History of successful collaborations with local jurisdictions. PlaceWorks has
successfully collaborated with local jurisdictions throughout California and has
long-standing relationships with the adjacent cities of Irvine, Newport Beach and
Lake Forest, and Garden Grove. PlaceWorks has successfully completed
environmental review documents pursuant to CEQA, NEPA, and a multitude of
other relevant environmental laws.
• Highly qualified technical environmental staff and subconsultants. The project
team members are experienced environmental analysts with over 20+ years of
combined experience with CEQA and in the preparation of environmental impact
reports. Furthermore, in its Proposal to Provide Services, PlaceWorks has
committed senior staff to work on the proposal and reputable sub -consultants in
specific fields.
2
The total proposed contract amount is $86,165.00 and is anticipated to take place within
the next 5-6 months. Sufficient funding is/will be available for the project within the
anticipated environmental review timeframe. It should be noted that this contract amount
also includes a five percent contingency budget.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
An alternative would be to reject the bid and reinitiate the RFP process.
The City's CEQA guidelines do allow environmental documents to be prepared by in-
house staff. However, the nature, scope, and complexity of this project and current staff
demands do not make this a viable or practical option.
FISCAL REVIEW
The cost for this contract is 100% funded by the applicant, Westport Properties, Inc.
Upon execution of the contract, the $86,165.00 contract amount (plus the City's 10
percent administrative processing fee) will be deposited in a City escrow account that is
managed by the project planner.
LEGAL REVIEW
The attached draft professional services agreement has been reviewed and approved as
to the form by the City Attorney's office.
CONCLUSION
Staff recommends that PlaceWorks be awarded the environmental consulting contract for
the project IS/ MND. Through a competitive selection process, staff believes that this firm
is the most qualified to complete the work in a comprehensive and timely manner, based
on their relevant experience and technical expertise.
MINOO ASHABI, AIA
Principal Planner
GARY ARMSTRONG, AICP
Director of Economic & Development /
Deputy CEO
Attachment: Draft Professional Services Aareement
cc: Chief Executive Officer
Assistant Chief Executive Officer
Director of Economic & Development / Deputy CEO
City Attorney
Public Services Director
Transportation Svs. Mgr.
City Engineer
City Clerk (9)
Staff (7)
File (2)
3
Nicole Morse, Esq.
PlaceWorks
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, CA 92707
C. Jamie Alai
Vice President Development
Westport Properties, Inc.
US Storage Centers
2201 Dupont Dr., Suite 700
Irvine, CA 92612
Donald Lamm
Diamond Star Associates, Inc.
4100 MacArthur Blvd., Ste 330
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Brandon Johnson
Tierra Development Advisors
901 Dove Street, Suite 140
Newport Beach, CA 92660
M
CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR
AGENCY TO THE COSTA MESA
REDEVEL OPMEN T A GENC Y
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2014
ITEM NUMBER: CC -8
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE FY 2014-2015 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
DATE: OCTOBER 10, 2014
FROM: FINANCE DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION BY: STEPHEN DUNIVENT, INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: STEPHEN DUNIVENT, (714) 754-5243
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council and the Successor Agency to the Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency (Successor
Agency) adopt Resolutions approving the Statement of Investment Policies for Fiscal Year 2014-
2015 and delegating investment activities to the City Treasurer.
BACKGROUND
The California Government Code Section 53646(a)(2) requires the City Treasurer to submit a
"Statement of Investment Policy" to the legislative body each fiscal year. These Investment
Policies have been designed and developed according to the specific needs of the City of Costa
Mesa and Successor Agency and complies with the California Government Code, guidelines
recommended by the California Municipal Treasurer's Association (CMTA), guidelines
recommended by the Association of Public Treasurers of the United States and Canada
(APTUS&C) and recommendations by Chandler Asset Management, the City's contracted
investment manager.
The City Finance Director serves as both the City Treasurer and the Successor Agency Treasurer.
The single most important statutory duty of the Treasurer is set forth in California Government
Code Section 41001 which provides that the "City Treasurer shall receive and safely keep all
money coming into the Treasury." In light of these statutory responsibilities, the California
Municipal Treasurer's Association has established the following guidelines to prudent
investment strategy for local treasurers to follow:
1
Legal Investment Authority: Temporary idle monies are to be invested in accordance with state
and local statutes and in compliance with California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq.
• Safety: It is the primary duty and responsibility of the Treasurer to protect, preserve, and
maintain intact cash and investments placed in trust with the Treasurer on behalf of the
citizens of the City of Costa Mesa.
• Li uidi : An adequate percentage of the portfolio should be maintained in liquid short-
term securities, which can be converted to cash if necessary to meet disbursement
requirements.
• Yield: The Treasurer shall obtain the highest possible yield within the parameters of the
City's and Successor Agency's authorized investments, provided the criteria for safety
and liquidity have been met.
ANALYSIS
The Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Investment Policies adopted on November 19, 2013, has been revised
for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 to reflect the changes described below:
• Section VI Standard of Prudence has been revised to replace the general, historical
standard of the "Prudent Person Rule" with the "Prudent Investor" standard used in State
Code.
• Section VII Authorized Investments has been substantially revised to incorporate explicit
ratings, maturity and concentration limits with each authorized investment type. This
revised section is based on State Code overlaid with industry best practices. In addition,
it is recommended to add high grade municipal securities to the authorized investment
list.
• Former Section XI Derivative Investments has been incorporated into a broader Section
XI Portfolio Risk Management based on industry best practices.
• Former Section XIV Qualified Dealers is replaced by a more definitive Section XIV
Authorized Financial Institutions, Depositories and Broker/Dealers using best practices
dealer language.
These changes to the Investment Policies have been presented to and discussed with the Finance
Advisory Committee. The Committee approved the changes on September 30, 2014.
FA
CONCLUSION
The attached Investment Policies have been revised to include the proposed changes referenced
above. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution Number 14 -
approving the City Statement of Investment Policy for the 2014-15 fiscal year and Resolution
Number 14- approving the Successor Agency Statement of Investment Policy for the 2014-
15 fiscal year.
STEPHEN DUNIVENT
Interim Finance Director
Attachments:
1) FY 2013-14 Red -Lined Statement of Investment Policy for the City and Successor
AizencX
2) FY 2014-15 City Proposed Statement of Investment Policy
Investment Guidelines and Strategy
Investment Procedures: Internal Controls - Guidelines
Cash Controls
Segregation of Responsibilities of the Treasury Functions
Glossary
3) FY 2014-15 Successor Agency Proposed Statement of Investment Policy
Investment Guidelines and Strategy
Investment Procedures: Internal Controls - Guidelines
Cash Controls
Segregation of Responsibilities of the Treasury Functions
Glossary
4) City Resolution 14-
5) Successor Agency Resolution 14-
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2014 ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE AND TURF MAINTENANCE CONTRACT AMENDMENT - MIDORI
GARDENS, INC.
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2014
FROM: PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT - MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION
PRESENTATION BY: ERNESTO MUNOZ, PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BRUCE HARTLEY (714) 754-5123
RECOMMENDATION
Approve an Amendment to the contract with Midori Gardens, Inc. to extend the term
from June 30, 2014 to February 28, 2015 for the landscape maintenance of parks,
facilities and sports fields in the amount of $37,051.67 per month.
2. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer and the City Clerk to execute the Amendment
to the Performance Services Agreement.
BACKGROUND
On September 19, 2006, the City Council awarded a contract for landscape
maintenance to Midori Gardens, Inc. in an annual amount of $305,076.64. The
contract was for an initial term of two (2) years, with four optional one (1) year renewals
ending in September 2012. The contract was amended on three occasions; once to
approve the optional renewals, and two subsequent amendments to extend the term to
June 30, 2014. The contractor is currently working on a month-to-month basis.
ANALYSIS
Midori Gardens, Inc. has been performing satisfactorily for the duration of the contract.
The previous amendments were entered into to allow time for the City to complete the
Request for Proposal process during the outsourcing feasibility studies for all park and
landscape maintenance services. It was anticipated that at such time as the outsourcing
was implemented, the existing contract would have been terminated.
With the completion of the feasibility studies and the determination to continue with a
hybrid of in-house and contract services for park and landscape maintenance, the
intention was to re -advertise the work prior to the end of the amended term. The
specifications were not completed prior to June 30, 2014. The contractor has continued
to provide the service on a month-to-month basis. The preparation of the specifications is
currently underway. The park and landscape maintenance contract is anticipated to be
advertised in November 2014 and brought to City Council for award in February 2015.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
The Council could extend the contract for a longer term, continuing service with the
existing landscape contractor.
FISCAL REVIEW
The contract cost for landscape maintenance services is included in the Public Services
Department FY 2014-15 Operating Budget.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved the attached Amendment to the
Performance Services Agreement as to form.
CONCLUSION
The current contract with Midori Gardens, Inc. has reached the maximum term allowed in
the current agreement. An amendment to the contract will allow for the completion of the
formal bid process to identify the lowest responsible bid and establish a new multi-year
agreement. It is anticipated the bid process will be complete and a request to award a
new contract will be brought to the City Council in February 2015.
STEV DUNIVENT
Interim Finance Director
KIMBERL WILSO
Purchasing Supervisor
ERNESTO NOZ
Public Se es Director
UCE FI RTLEY
Maintenance Services Manager
Attachments: 1. Amendment to the Performance Services Agreement
C: Midori Gardens, Inc.
3231 South Main Street
Santa Ana, CA 92707
2
ATTACHMENT #1
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PERFORMANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR LANDSCAPE AND TURF MAINTENANCE
THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT, is made and entered into this November , 2014,
by and between the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a California municipal corporation ("City")
and MIDORI GARDENS, a California Corporation ("Contractor"). The abovementioned
parties being hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties".
Recitals
A. City entered into an Agreement with Contractor on October 17, 2006, to perform
landscape and turf maintenance of parks, facilities and sports fields; and
B. The parties have exercised the maximum number of extensions authorized under the
Agreement; and
C. The term of the Agreement expired on June 30, 2014; and
D. The City desires to issue a new Request for Proposals for the services currently
provided by Contractor; and
E. The Contractor has continued to provide services subject to the Agreement upon the
understanding and agreement that the term of the Contract was extended on a month
to month basis; and
F. The Parties now desire to execute this written amendment to the Agreement
extending the term of the Agreement so that Contractor continues to provide services
under the Agreement and the City has time to issue a new Request for Proposals; and
G. The Parties desire to extend the term of the Agreement herein from July 1, 2014
through February 28, 2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions set forth in the
Agreement, the Parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:
1. Paragraph 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the term of the
Agreement until February 28, 2015.
2. Paragraph 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to include the following:
Commencing July 1, 2014, the City agrees to pay Contractor the additional amounts
below unless the Agreement is sooner terminated. The amount owed shall be paid
according to the schedule below and shall not exceed $296,413.36.
Monthly Period _ _ Monthly Payment Amount
July 1,2014 thru July 31, 2014 $37,051.67
August 1, 2014 thru August 31, 2014 $37,051.67
September 1, 2014 thru September 30, 2014 $37,051.67
October 1, 2014 thru October 31, 2014 $37,051.67
November 1, 2014 thru November 30, 2014
$37,051.67
December 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014
$37,051.67
January 1, 2015 thru Janua 31, 2015
$37,051.67
February 1, 2015 thru February 28, 2015
$37,051.67
TOTAL
$296,413.36
3. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This
Amendment with the Agreement shall be construed together and shall constitute one
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed by and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above
written.
Customer:
CITY OF COSTA MESA,
A Municipal Corporation
Tom Hatch, Chief Executive Officer
Dated
Approved as to Form:
Thomas P. Duarte, City Attorney
Dated
Contractor:
MIDORI GARDENS,
A California Corporation
Presid
I
Dated
Imp
Approved:
(t�;
Ernesto Mug , Public Services Director
Dated
4
Cl T Y COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: CC -10
SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE AND TURF MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - SPECTRUMCARE
LANDSCAPE
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2014
FROM: PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT - MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION
PRESENTATION BY: ERNESTO MUNOZ, PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BRUCE HARTLEY (714) 754-5123
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve an Amendment to the contract with SpectrumCare Landscape to extend
the term from June 30, 2014 to February 28, 2015 for the landscape maintenance of
parkways, medians, & fire stations in the amount of $29,560.53 per month.
2. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer and the City Clerk to execute the Amendment
to the Performance Services Agreement.
BACKGROUND
The City Council awarded a contract to SpectrumCare Landscape at the meeting of
September 19, 2006, in an annual amount of $213,192. The contract was for an initial
term of five (5) years, with three optional one (1) year renewals ending in September
2011. The contract was amended on three previous occasions extending the term to
June 30, 2014. The contractor is currently working on a month-to-month basis.
ANALYSIS
SpectrumCare Landscape has been performing satisfactorily for the duration of the
contract. The previous amendments were entered into to allow time for the City to
complete the Request for Proposal process during the outsourcing feasibility studies for
all park and landscape maintenance services. It was anticipated that at such time as the
outsourcing was implemented, the existing contract would have been terminated.
With the completion of the feasibility studies and the determination to continue with a
hybrid of in-house and contract services, the intention was to re -advertise the work prior
to the end of the amended term. The specifications were not completed prior to June 30,
2014. The contractor has continued to provide the service on a month-to-month basis.
The preparation of the specifications is currently underway. The park and landscape
maintenance contract is anticipated to be advertised in November 2014 and brought to
City Council in February 2015 for award.
1
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
The Council could extend the contract for a longer term, continuing service with the
existing landscape contractor.
FISCAL REVIEW
The contract cost for landscape maintenance services is included in the Public Services
Department FY 2014-15 Operating Budget.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved the attached Amendment to the
Performance Services Agreement as to form.
CONCLUSION
The current contract with SpectrumCare Landscape has reached the maximum term
allowed in the current agreement. An amendment to the contract will allow for the
completion of the formal bid process to identify the lowest responsible bid and establish a
new multi-year agreement. It is anticipated the bid process will be complete and a
request to award a new contract will be brought to the City Council in February 2015.
STEVE DUNIVENT
Interim Finance Director
KIMBERLY WILSON
Purchasing Supervisor
ERNESTO MUNOZ
Public Service Director
BRUCE HARTLEY
Maintenance Services Manager
Attachments: 1. Amendment to the Performance Services Aareement
C: John Hall
SpectrumCare
27181 Burbank
Foothill Ranch, CA 92610
it
ATTACHMENT #1
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PERFORMANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR LANDSCAPE AND TURF MAINTENANCE
THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT, is made and entered into this November_,
2014, by and between the CITY OF COSTA MESA, a California municipal corporation
("City") and SPECTRUMCARE LANDSCAPE, a California Corporation ("Contractor").
The abovementioned parties being hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties".
Recitals
A. City entered into an Agreement with Contractor on October 17, 2006, to perform
landscape and turf maintenance of parks, facilities and sports fields; and
B. The parties have exercised the maximum number of extensions authorized under the
Agreement; and
C. The term of the Agreement expired on June 30, 2014; and
D. The City desires to issue a new Request for Proposals for the services currently
provided by Contractor; and
E. The Contractor has continued to provide services subject to the Agreement upon the
understanding and agreement that the term of the Contract was extended on a month
to month basis; and
F. The Parties now desire to execute this written amendment to the Agreement
extending the term of the Agreement so that Contractor continues to provide services
under the Agreement and the City has time to issue a new Request for Proposals; and
G. The Parties desire to extend the term of the Agreement herein from July 1, 2014
through February 28, 2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions set forth in the
Agreement, the Parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:
1. Paragraph 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the term of the
Agreement until February 28, 2014.
2. Paragraph 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to include the following:
Commencing July 1, 2014, the City agrees to pay Contractor the additional amounts
below unless the Agreement is sooner terminated. The amount owed shall be paid
according to the schedule below and shall not exceed $236,484.24.
Monthly Period
Monthly Payment Amount
July 1, 2014 thru July 31, 2014
$29,560.53
August 1, 2014 thru August 31, 2014
$29,560.53
September 1, 2014 thru September 30, 2014
$29,560.53
October 1, 2014 thru October 31, 2014
$29,560.53
November 1, 2014 thru November 30, 2014
$29,560.53
December 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014
$29,560.53
January 1, 2015 thru January 31, 2015
$29,560.53
February 1, 2015 thru February 28, 2015
$29,560.53
TOTAL
$236,484.24
3. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This
Amendment with the Agreement shall be construed together and shall constitute one
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed by and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first
above written.
Customer: Contractor:
CITY OF COSTA MESA, SPECTRUMCARE LANDSCAPE,
A Municipal Corporation A California Corporation
�bra
Tom Hatch, Chief Executive Officer Pr Tent
Io - 22
Dated Dated
Approved as to Form: Approved:
mas P. Duarte, City Attorney
Dated
Hublic Services Director
I l •1cj• 14
A
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: CC -11
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA (BIA) TO ADD A NEW
HOTEL THAT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE BIA ASSESSMENT
DATE: OCTOBER 29, 2014
FROM: CITY CEO'S OFFICE
PRESENTATION BY: DANIEL K. BAKER, MANAGEMENT ANALYST
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Baker (714) 754-5156
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MODIFY THE
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA COVERING CERTAIN COSTA MESA HOTELS AND
MOTELS AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING AND A
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSAL. (Attachment 1)
BACKGROUND:
The California Legislature adopted the Parking in Business Improvement Area Law of 1989
(Streets and Highways Code, §36500), which enables cities to impose an assessment fee
on businesses within an area designated by the city.
On July 5, 1995, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 95-9 to establish a Business
Improvement Area (BIA) for the purpose of assisting the hotel and motel industry in its
promotion of tourism within the city. The BIA imposed an assessment on the sale of hotel
and motel overnight guest room stays. This money is used for the establishment and
maintenance of a local tourism and promotion council. The Costa Mesa City Council
authorized the city manager to enter into an agreement with the Costa Mesa Tourism and
Promotion Council to develop and administer the BIA. In 2001, the Costa Mesa Conference
& Visitor Bureau (CVB) became the administrator of the BIA.
In accordance with the CVB's bylaws (Attachment 2), the CVB's Board of Directors is
currently comprised of 10 general managers from the 10 participating hotels, one member
of the City Council, and the City Chief Executive Officer's designee. The CVB's Board of
Directors is also appointed as the Advisory Board to the City Council concerning certain
matters related to the BIA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 36530.
In June, the participating hotels requested and recommended that the BIA be modified
such that the BLVD Hotel, located at 2430 Newport Blvd, be included and be subject to the
BIA assessment in the manner described above (Attachment 3). The BLVD Hotel has also
expressed a desire in being included in the BIA and being subject to the assessment
(Attachment 4).
ANALYSIS:
Currently, the number of properties included in the BIA assessment levy is limited to the
10 hotels that have expressed an interest in participating in the program as detailed in the
resolution of intention (Attachment 1). State law requires a very specific procedure in
modifying the BIA to include an additional hotel. Within 7 days of the adoption of the
resolution of intention, potentially affected hotel and motel businesses will be notified in
writing of the proposed modification, public meeting, and public hearing. The resolution will
also be published in the Daily Pilot prior to the public meeting of January 6, 2015, at 7 p.m.,
and public hearing of January 20, 2015, at 7 p.m. At the public meeting, an ordinance
concerning the proposed modification will be presented to the City Council and, if the City
Council is amenable, the ordinance will have its first reading at the public hearing.
Affected businesses will be provided an opportunity to protest the annual assessment or
address any concerns regarding the BIA at the public meeting and public hearing. The City
Council will vote to adopt or deny the ordinance concerning the proposed modification, and
makes the ultimate decision as to the size of and the businesses to be included in the BIA.
Once the proposed modification is approved, the assessment is collected along with the
city's Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). The hotels and motels included in the BIA are
required to itemize the BIA levy as a separate assessment. The CVB staff manages the
day-to-day activities and provides all services to administer the BIA.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
The Council may vote to deny the resolution of intention, which will prevent a public
meeting and public hearing from taking place to consider the ordinance concerning the
proposed modification to include the BLVD Hotel in the BIA area.
FISCAL REVIEW:
The annual fiscal year 2013-14 revenue for the CVB totaled approximately 2.2 million
dollars. The addition of an eleventh hotel will increase revenues and allow for additional
funding to promote the tourism industry in Costa Mesa.
LEGAL REVIEW:
Legal counsel has prepared the resolution of intention and reviewed the documents and
approved as to form.
CONCLUSION:
Adoption of the resolution of intent is the initial step to modifying the BIA. State law
mandates the specific procedure to be followed in modifying the BIA. Staff will make a
presentation to the City Council on the implementation of the proposed modification at the
public hearing on January 6, 2015, but the City Council must approve the proposed
resolution of intention before the hearing can be scheduled to consider the proposed
modification.
E
DANIEL K. BAKER
Management Analyst
THOMAS DUARTE
City Attorney
THOMAS R. HATCH
City CEO
DISTRIBUTION: Costa Mesa Conference & Visitor Bureau
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Resolution of Intention
2. Bylaws of Costa Mesa Conference & Visitor Bureau
3. Letter from CVB concerning proposed modification
4. Letter from BLVD Hotel concerning proposed
modification
c�
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: NB -1
SUBJECT: HOST TOWN PARTICIPATION FOR 2015 SPECIAL OLYMPICS WORLD
GAMES
DATE: October 29, 2014
FROM: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE
PRESENTATION BY: DANIEL K. BAKER, MANAGEMENT ANALYST
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Baker @ (714) 754-5328
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to City staff regarding the
City's participation as a Host Town for the 2015 Special Olympics World Games.
BACKGROUND:
On September 14, 2011, the Special Olympics International Board of Directors
announced that the 2015 Special Olympics World Games would be held in Los Angeles
from July 25 -August 2, 2015.
Special Olympics is an international organization that changes lives through the power
of sport by encouraging and empowering people with intellectual disabilities, promoting
acceptance for all, and fostering communities of understanding and respect worldwide.
Founded in 1968 by Eunice Kennedy Shriver, the Special Olympics movement has
grown from a few hundred athletes to more than 3.7 million athletes in over 170
communities in all regions of the world, providing year-round sports training, athletic
competition and other related programs. Special Olympics provides people with
intellectual disabilities continuing opportunities to realize their potential, develop
physical fitness, demonstrate courage, and experience joy and friendship.
Alternating between Summer and Winter Games every two years, thousands of Special
Olympics athletes worldwide come together to showcase their athletic skills and
celebrate the spirit of Special Olympics. The Special Olympics World Summer Games
were last held in the United States in 1999 in Raleigh, North Carolina. The most recent
World Summer Games (2011) were held in Athens, Greece.
The 2015 Special Olympics World Summer Games are expected to bring more than a
half- million people to the greater Los Angeles area and will be held in the summer of
2015, with more than 7,000 Special Olympics athletes from 177 nations to compete in
25 Olympic -type sports.
ANALYSIS:
Staff received a number of inquiries from the Special Olympic organizing staff regarding
the City's interest in participation with the Special Olympics "Host Towns" program. The
program seeks local communities willing to provide accommodations, training facilities,
and cultural/sport activities for the 7,000 international athletes and their coaches from
July 21 -July 24, 2015.
This period is intended to provide the athletes and coaches some time to become
acclimated to the time difference and weather of Southern California, as well as give
them opportunities to learn about local communities while still being a short distance
from the Olympic venue.
City representatives spoke with Ms. Dawn O'leary, Director -Host Town, 2015 Special
Olympics World Games. Ms. O'leary provided an overview of the upcoming World
Games and what the various responsibilities would be as a Host Town. Each
community that agrees to be a Host Town will have approximately 100 delegates,
consisting of athletes and coaches. A summary of the responsibilities are as follows:
1. Accommodations: 50 double -occupancy rooms for the athletes and coaches in or
near Costa Mesa. This can include hotel rooms or college dormitories.
2. Training Facilities: Location for the athletes to practice their skills prior to the games.
Facilities to include track, soccer field, and gymnasium. This can include local high
schools, colleges, or City facilities.
I Transportation: Host Town to provide
athletes and coaches are in Costa
transportation to and from Los Angeles.
transportation during the four clays the
Mesa. Special Olympics will coordinate
4. Food: Host Town to coordinate breakfast, lunch, and dinner for athletes and
coaches during their visit to Costa Mesa.
5. Activities: Communities are asked to provide 2 two-hour events to introduce the
athletes to the community, promote the Special Olympics, and provide cultural
exchange opportunities. This can include a trip to the OC Fair, a visit to the South
Costa Repertoire, or a BBQ hosted by the City or other community group, etc.
Attached is literature provided by the Special Olympics on being a Host Town
(Attachment No.1).
Should Costa Mesa become a Host Town, staff will begin creating a committee and
seeking involvement from the various clubs and organizations within the community.
2
Additionally, staff will set up a small press event in December where staff will invite
members and athletes from the Special Olympics as well as community members to
announce Costa Mesa's participation.
FISCAL REVIEW:
The financial impact for the City to lend its support to Costa Mesa Host Town in
conjunction with the 2015 Special Olympics World Games in Los Angeles is expected
to primarily be indirect costs, including staff time and other in-kind support, and possible
displacement of facility rental revenue. The City could also incur additional direct costs
related to marketing and hosting events. Overall, direct costs to support Costa Mesa
Host Town are anticipated to be less than $20,000.
If the City Council approves Costa Mesa's official support of Costa Mesa Host Town,
these costs will be considered in the development of the 2015-16 proposed budget and
presented to the City Council in June 2015.
If Costa Mesa chooses to become a Host Town, staff will begin working with community
groups to fundraise for this event and allocate appropriate funding in the Fiscal Year
2015-16 budget. In fact, the City has had informal communications with Vanguard
University with regard to the use of their facilities (attachment 2).
LEGAL REVIEW:
No legal review is required for this item.
CONCLUSION:
If the City Council decides to move forward with becoming a host town, City staff will
begin preparations to ensure a successful event.
DANIEL K. BAKER
Management Analyst
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Host Town Fact Sheet
Letter from Vanguard
3
Cl T Y COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: NB -2
SUBJECT: TWO MEDICAL MARIJUANA INITIATIVE PETITIONS QUALIFYING FOR BALLOT;
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING NEW ORDINANCE, ORDERING ELECTION OR
ORDERING REPORT; CONSIDERATION OF CITY MEDICAL MARIJUANA MEASURE(S)
DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 2014
FROM: CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
PRESENTATION BY: CHRIS F. NEUMEYER, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY;
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RICK FRANCIS, ASSISTANT CEO, 714-754-5688
RECOMMENDATION:
A. It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Accept the Certificate of Sufficiency issued by the County of Orange Registrar of
Voters regarding: An Initiative to Allow Operation of Up to Eight Medical Marijuana
(Cannabis) Businesses in the City of Costa Mesa; and
2. Accept the Certificate of Sufficiency issued by the County of Orange Registrar of
Voters regarding: An Initiative to Allow Operation of up to Four Licensed Medical
Marijuana Businesses in City of Costa Mesa.
B. Further, it is recommended that the City Council approve (for each initiative) one of the
following options:
1. Adopt the ordinance (for either initiative), without alteration, at the regular meeting
at which the certification of the petition is presented, or within 10 days after it is
presented (authorized by the Election Code, yet not recommended, see "Taxation
Issues" below); or
2. Order a special election (for either initiative), to be held pursuant to subdivision (a)
of Election Code § 1405 [which states that the election for a municipal initiative that
qualifies shall be held not less than 88 nor more than 103 days after the date of the
order of election], at which the ordinance, without alteration, shall be submitted to a
vote of the voters of the city; or
3. Order a regular election (for either initiative), to be consolidated with the next
"regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing body of the
local government," pursuant to Art XIII C § 2(b) of the California Constitution, which
would be November 8, 2016; or
4. Order a report pursuant to Election Code § 9212 (for either initiative) at the regular
meeting at which the certification of the petition is presented.
1
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL ACTION:
The City Council may consider taking action on the City Measure to Establish Regulation of
Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Regulation of Medical Marijuana Cultivation as proposed
on August 5, 2014, or an amended version of that prior Measure.
BACKGROUND:
Two initiative petitions, each with the intent of authorizing the operation of medical marijuana
businesses within the City of Costa Mesa, have been recently gathering signatures for
placement on the local ballot.
Pursuant to the Election Code, both of these initiatives have now qualified for placement on the
local ballot at a special election.
Elections Code § 9215 provides that an initiative petition qualifies for placement on the local
ballot at a regular election if not less than 10% of the registered voters of the City have signed
the petition. Elections Code § 9214 provides that an initiative petition qualifies for placement on
the local ballot at a special election if not less than 15% of the registered voters of the City have
signed the petition and the initiative petition itself asks for a special election.
Both of the medical marijuana initiative petitions requested a special election. The number of
registered voters in the City of Costa Mesa last reported by the County of Orange election
official to the Secretary of State was 49,237 registered voters. Fifteen percent of this total
number of registered voters is 7,385, thus being the number of verified signatures required for
one of these initiative petitions to qualify for a special election.
The first initiative, "Allow Operation of Up to Eight Medical Marijuana (Cannabis) Businesses in
the City of Costa Mesa", was entitled by the City Attorney's Office (and named "Medical
Cannabis Control Act" by its proponents) was submitted by proponents Robert Taft, Jr. and
Kevin Gardner (with the counsel of attorney Randall T. Longwith) to the City Clerk's Office on
September 16, 2014 with 11,080 signatures (hereinafter referred to as "Ordinance No. 1"). This
initiative was promptly delivered to the Orange County Registrar of Voters for verification of the
signatures. Refer to Attachment No. 1 for the full text of the proposed Ordinance No. 1.
The second initiative, "Allow Operation of Up to Four Licensed Medical Marijuana Businesses in
the City of Costa Mesa", was entitled by the City Attorney's Office (and named "An Initiative to
Provide Revenue to Costa Mesa Citizens" by its proponents) was submitted by proponents
Taylor Webster and Michael Levesque (with the counsel of attorney David Welch) to the City
Clerk's Office on October 9, 2014 with 10,904 signatures (hereinafter referred to as "Ordinance
No. 2"). This initiative was promptly delivered to the Orange County Registrar of Voters for
verification of the signatures. Refer to Attachment No. 2 for the full text of the proposed
Ordinance No. 2.
The Orange County Registrar of Voters has examined the records of voter registration for the
City of Costa Mesa and has determined that both of the initiative petitions have been signed by
no less than fifteen percent of City of Costa Mesa registered voters.
Therefore both of the initiative petitions are sufficient to be certified to the City Council. The
Election Code requires the City Clerk to certify to the City Council any initiative petition which
qualifies for an election. (Elections Code §§ 9211, 9114). Refer to Attachments Nos. 3 & 4 for
Certifications.
ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Elections Code § 9214, ["Duty of legislative body regarding initiative petition signed
by certain percent of voters with request to submit ordinance to vote at special election"] if an
initiative petition is signed by not less than 15 percent of the registered voters of a city, and
contains a request that the ordinance be submitted immediately to a vote of the people at a
special election, the legislative body shall do one of the following:
a) Adopt the ordinance, without alteration, at the regular meeting at which the certification
of the petition is presented, or within 10 days after it is presented; or
b) Immediately order a special election, to be held pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section1405 [which states that the election for a municipal initiative that qualifies shall
be held not less than 88 nor more than 103 days after the date of the order of election],
at which the ordinance, without alteration, shall be submitted to a vote of the voters of
the city; or
c) Order a report pursuant to Section 9212 at the regular meeting at which the certification
of the petition is presented. When the report is presented to the legislative body, the
legislative body shall either adopt the ordinance within 10 days or order an election
pursuant to subdivision (b).
Elections Code § 9212 ["Referral of proposed initiative measure to city agency for report"]
provides that the City Council may refer the proposed initiative measure to any city agency or
agencies for a report on any matter the City Council requests to be in the report, including but
not limited to:
1. Its fiscal impact; and/or
2. Its effect on the internal consistency of the city's general and specific plans, including the
housing element, the consistency between planning and zoning, and the limitations on city
actions under Section 65008 of the Government Code and Chapters 4.2 (commencing
with Section 65913) and 4.3 (commencing with Section 65915) of Division 1 of Title 7 of
the Government Code; and/or
3. Its effect on the use of land, the impact on the availability and location of housing, and the
ability of the city to meet its regional housing needs; and/or
4. Its impact on funding for infrastructure of all types, including, but not limited to,
transportation, schools, parks, and open space. The report may also discuss whether the
measure would be likely to result in increased infrastructure costs or savings, including the
costs of infrastructure maintenance, to current residents and businesses; and/or
5. Its impact on the community's ability to attract and retain business and employment;
and/or
6. Its impact on the uses of vacant parcels of land; and/or
7. Its impact on agricultural lands, open space, traffic congestion, existing business districts,
and developed areas designated for revitalization.
The report(s) shall be presented to the City Council no later than 30 days after the elections
official certifies to the legislative body the sufficiency of the initiative petitions.
Because the November 18, 2014 meeting is when certification of the initiative petitions will
occur, any reports requested shall be returned to the City Council no later than December 18,
2014.
3
Given the upcoming schedule of regular City Council meetings, the reports would need to be
returned at the December 2, 2014 meeting.
At the subsequent City Council meeting when the report(s) are presented, the City Council shall
then pursuant to Elections Code § 9214 either, as previously stated, adopt the ordinances or
order a special election.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF TWO PROPOSED ORDINANCES
The two initiative petitions differ in the details on how they each propose to authorize and
regulate medical marijuana businesses within the City of Costa Mesa. Some key differences to
note include:
1. Amendment — Although both measures cannot be repealed except by another vote of
the electorate, Ordinance No. 1 furthermore cannot be amended at all except by a vote
of the electorate, whereas Ordinance No. 2 allows amendment by the City Council to
further the purposes of the ordinance.
2. Application Fees — Ordinance No. 1 caps application fees for cost recovery at $500,
whereas Ordinance No. 2 allows the City Council to pass a fee resolution for cost
recovery.
3. Permits — Ordinance No. 1 requires only a business license, whereas Ordinance No. 2
requires in addition to a business license both a separate dispensary permit as well as
operator permits.
4. Minimum Number of Dispensaries — Ordinance No. 1 authorizes a minimum of eight
dispensaries, whereas Ordinance No. 2 authorizes a minimum of four dispensaries.
5. See attached matrix (Attachment No. 5) that further compares Ordinances No. 1 and 2
along with a proposed City Medical Marijuana Ordinance, previously considered by the
City Council on August 5, 2014.
TAXATION ISSUES
Both of the initiative petitions include new taxes.
Ordinance No. 1 and Ordinance No. 2 each propose a six percent tax on medical marijuana
businesses.
Ordinance No. 1 proposes a sales tax of one percent "on the sale of all other tangible personal
property at retail." Presently the City already has a one percent local sales tax. Raising the local
sales tax above one percent likely will lead to sales tax collection issues with the Board of
Equalization, which will not collect a locally mandated sales tax above one percent.
Other issues may present themselves with collection of these taxes. Significant and atypical
election issues also present themselves because of the proposed tax increases.
The California Constitution in Art XIII C § 2(b), as amended by Proposition 218 in 1996,
provides in full that "No local government may impose, extend, or increase any general tax
unless and until that tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a majority vote.
A general tax shall not be deemed to have been increased if it is imposed at a rate not higher
than the maximum rate so approved. The election required by this subdivision shall be
consolidated with a regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing
body of the local government, except in cases of emergency declared by a unanimous vote
of the governing body." (Emphasis added).
12
1. Voter Approval for New General Taxes
As required by the California Constitution in Art XIII C § 2(b), new general taxes imposed by a
local government must be approved by the voters. (The tax measures in the two initiatives are
general taxes and are not special taxes.)
Even if the City Council were to adopt one of the ordinances (which normally is an option under
Elections Code § 9214 when an initiative petition qualifies for a special election), there would
remain the matter of voter approval of the new general taxes being imposed.
California law in Elections Code § 9214 also prohibits the City Council from altering an
ordinance proposed by initiative petition.
Thus, the City Council may not split up the proposed ordinances by adopting the non -tax
provisions and then separately sending just the tax provisions to the voters.
Government Code section 53723 (added by Proposition 62 in 1986) further provides in full that
"No local government, or district, whether or not authorized to levy a property tax, may impose
any general tax unless and until such general tax is submitted to the electorate of the local
government, or district and approved by a majority vote of the voters voting in an election on the
issue."
2. Regular Election (Not Special Election) for Voter Approval for New General Taxes
As referenced above, Art XIII C § 2(b) of the California Constitution provides that an election on
general tax increases "shall be consolidated with a regularly scheduled general election for
members of the governing body of the local government, except in cases of emergency
declared by a unanimous vote of the governing body."
Thus, new general taxes imposed by a local government which are to be sent to the voters,
should not be presented at a special election, unless the City Council unanimously declares a
fiscal emergency.
Rather, new general taxes imposed by a local government should be presented to the voters at
"a regularly scheduled general election for members of the governing body of the local
government."
The next such election which meets those conditions is November 8, 2016.
ELECTION DATES
Elections Code § 1405, pursuant to Election Code § 9214, provides that the election for a
municipal initiative that qualifies for a special election shall be held not less than 88 nor more
than 103 days after the date of the order of election.
Thus, if the City Council orders a special election at the November 18, 2014 meeting, then the
window during which a special election would need to be held is between February 14, 2015
and March 1, 2015.
If the City Council requests reports from City agencies/departments on the ordinances, the
reports would need to be returned at the only regularly scheduled City Council meeting for the
month of December, being December 2, 2014.
If the City Council orders a special election at the December 2, 2014 meeting, then the window
during which a special election would need to be held is between February 28, 2015 and March
14, 2015
5
If the City Council orders pursuant to the California Constitution in Art XIII C § 2(b), as amended
by Proposition 218 in 1996, that the initiative petitions be sent to the voters at the next "regularly
scheduled general election for members of the governing body of the local government," then
the election would be held on November 8, 2016.
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL ACTION TO CONSIDER:
At the August 5, 2014 City Council meeting consideration was given to submitting to the voters
a Measure to Establish Regulation of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries and Regulation of
Medical Marijuana Cultivation ("Measure") which would add a new Chapter VI to Title 9.
At the October 21, 2014 City Council meeting the City Attorney's Office received direction to
bring back the proposed City's Medical Marijuana Ordinance for the City Council to address for
review and possible revisions.
Please refer to attachments for the language of the proposed Chapter VI (Attachment No. 6),
an outline of the proposed Chapter VI (Attachment No. 7), and a chart (Attachment No. 5)
which compares the proposed City's Ordinance (also referred to as Ordinance No. 3) with the
two citizen -backed ordinances.
Election Code section 9222 ["Proposition for repeal, amendment, or enactment of ordinance;
Time of election"] provides that the City Council may submit to the voters without a petition, a
proposition for the enactment of any ordinance, to be voted upon at any succeeding regular or
special city election; and, that the election shall be held not less than 88 days after the date of
the order of election.
The City Council by resolution may thus place a competing medical marijuana ballot measure
before the voters at the same election when the two citizen initiative measures are to be
considered by the voters.
Election Code section 9221 ["Conflicting provisions in two or more ordinances"] provides in full
that "[i]f the provisions of two or more ordinances adopted at the same election conflict, the
ordinance receiving the highest number of affirmative votes shall control." Both of the citizen
initiative petitions also provide that if two or more competing medical marijuana measures are
approved by the voters, then only the measure with the greatest number of affirmative votes
shall become the new law.
Thus, if the City places its own medical marijuana measure on the ballot with the two citizen
backed measures, the one receiving the most votes (if more than one passes) shall become the
local law (the City should also place a similar "only one measure wins" section in any City
backed measure).
At the outset, it must be noted that the anticipated passage of SB 1262 (which would have
imposed statewide regulations related to health and safety, oversight, security and local control)
has failed to materialize. On August 14, 2014 the Assembly Appropriations Committee failed to
pass SB 1262, effectively killing the bill for this year. In January there may or may not be a
resurrection of SB 1262.
Significant differences between the proposed City's Ordinance and the two citizen -backed
ordinances include the following requirements in the proposed City's Ordinance not contained in
the other two:
A
1. Security. Requires 24/7 security camera tapes which are accessible to law enforcement
and the City.
2. Record keeping. Requires maintenance of a substantially greater amount of records
detailing the operation (business, transaction, delivery, employee, etc.)
3. Priority to Old Businesses. Does not provide priority registration to old businesses.
4. Inspections. City CEO authorized to conduct reasonable inspections.
5. Taxes. Does not propose new taxes.
6. On -Site Recommendations. Does not allow on-site recommendations.
7. Employee Training. Required.
8. Limit Sales to Medical Marijuana Related Items. Yes.
9. Non -Concentration of Stores. No.
The following are significant issues that may warrant further discussion concerning details in the
City Medical Marijuana Ordinance based upon comments at the August 5, 2014 City Council
meeting:
1. Number of dispensaries. No limit to the number of dispensaries.
2. Hours/Days of Operations. 7:00 am to 10:00 p.m. any day of the week. Section 9-500(q)
3. City Office of Cultivation Standards and Qualify Control. New optional City department
created to conduct regular inspection of cultivation practices and procedures, as well as
to test medical marijuana. Section 9-501
4. Sunset Clause. Does not contain one (though allows amendment by Council to further
purposes).
5. Background checks. Felonies substantially related to qualifications, functions or duties
of an employee of a medical marijuana business (such as felony conviction for
distribution of controlled substances, money laundering, racketeering, etc.). Section 9-
500(d) (ii)
6. Security Guards. Prohibited from carrying firearms. Section 9-500(a)(i)
7. Non -Concentration of Stores. No restrictions on locating near other dispensaries.
8. Labeling. Does not require warning about not operating heavy machinery.
9. Smoking restrictions. Prohibited within 20 feet of dispensary. Section 9-500(r)
10. Liability Insurance. $1 million general policy minimum. Section 9-500(u)
11. Fire Sprinklers. Does not have requirements specific to medical marijuana industry.
12. Edibles. Products requiring refrigeration or hot -holding shall not be manufactured for
sale or distribution at dispensary. Section 9-500(m)(i)
7
FISCAL REVIEW:
The fiscal impact of placing the two medical marijuana initiatives on the ballot is multifold. There
are the costs of a special election (or consolidation with a general election, see "Taxation
Issues" in this Report) as well as the cost of implementing the proposed ordinances.
Furthermore, there is the potential revenue generated by the taxes in each ordinance.
1. Estimated special election costs to the City of Costa Mesa are as follows:
a. Stand Alone Special Election for One Ballot Measure: $234,067 - $261,790.
b. Stand Alone Special Election for Up to Four Ballot Measures: $252,980 -
$280,703.
c. Consolidated General Election for One Ballot Measure: $15,000.
d. Consolidated General Election for Up to Four Ballot Measures: $15,000 -
$60,000.
2. At present the estimated costs of implementing either of the ordinances is
indeterminate.
LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney's office has prepared this report with its legal analysis, and the City Attorney's
Office has reviewed the attached resolutions.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL ACTION:
It is recommended in regards to the proposed City Medical Marijuana Ordinance previously
considered by the City Council:
1. Order the City Medical Marijuana Ordinance be sent to the voters at the same election
at which the two initiative petitions are sent to the voters, with accompanying resolutions
calling for written arguments, rebuttals and the drafting by the City Attorney's Office of
an impartial analysis; or
2. Provide direction to the City Attorney's Office for revisions to the proposed City Medical
Marijuana Ordinance to be brought back to the City Council; or
3. Take no action on the proposed City Medical Marijuana Ordinance.
THOMAS P. DUARTE BRENDA GREEN
City Attorney City Clerk
RICK FRANCIS
Assistant CEO
ATTACHMENTS: refer to List
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX ATTACH M ENT 8
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO
CONDUCT A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON , 2015
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa has called a Special Municipal
Election to be held on , 2015, for the purpose of submitting to the voters of the City of
Costa Mesa questions relating to the adoption of proposed ordinances; and
WHEREAS, given the expertise and experience of the Elections Department of the
County of Orange, it is desirable that this Special Municipal Election be conducted by the
County within the City of Costa Mesa, in precincts, polling places and with election officers
utilized by the County's Elections Department, and that the County Election's Department also
canvass the returns of the Special Municipal Election.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa hereby respectfully requests that
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange consent and agree to conduct a Special
Municipal Election to be held on , 2015, for the purpose of submitting proposed
ordinances to the voters of the City of Costa Mesa through measures to appear on the ballot as
follows:
1
Measure _: Allow Operation of up to Eight Medical
Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to eight medical
--mar_ij.uana.___b.usiness.es__with: --- six_-.p-ercent--ta.x--_o.n_-..medical-
.-------Yes.._._.---._._-.-----
marijuana; one percent tax on other products; exemption
from permits; regulations not subject to change by City
Council except for increasing businesses; precedence to
No
prior businesses; and locations limited to commercial and
industrial areas, be adopted?
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1
43
K
Measure `: Allow Operation of up to Four Licensed
Medical Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa
Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to four medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; required industry specific licenses; required
operator permits; regulations subject to change by City
Council including increasing businesses; precedence to prior
No
businesses; and locations limited to commercial and
industrial areas, be adopted?
Measure _: Establish Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Dispensaries and Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Cultivation
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow general operation of medical
marijuana businesses with: required dispensary permits;
Yes
required cultivator permits; requirement to allow City
inspections; mandatory security cameras; requirement to
maintain business records; City Office of Cultivation
No
Standards and Quality Control; regulations subject to
amendment by City Council; and locations limited to
commercial and industrial areas, be adopted?
SECTION -2-.-- - - a -- e - ounty-Election's___Departmerit is requesfed and --authorized to
canvass the returns of the Special Municipal Election. That only one form of ballot be used in
such special election.
SECTION 3. The Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the County
Election's Department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding and canvassing of
such special election.
SECTION 4. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, said election shall be held
and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating special elections and the
holding of municipal elections.
SECTION 5, That the City of Costa Mesa recognizes that costs will be incurred by the
County by reason of such special election and the City Council hereby agrees to reimburse the
County for any and all such costs.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution
with the Board of Supervisors and the County Election's Department of the County of Orange.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2
SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution
and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Costa Mesa on this 18th day of November, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014, by the following
roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa
Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3
RESOLUTION NO, 14 -XX ATTACHMENT 9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE FOR THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
TO BE HELD ON , 2015, FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF A
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, pursuant to authority provided by statute a petition has been filed with the
legislative body of the City of Costa Mesa, California, signed by fifteen percent (15%) of the
number of registered voters of the city to submit a proposed ordinance entitled: Allow Operation
of up to Eight Medical Marijuana Businesses in City of Costa Mesa; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused to be examined, through the office of the Orange
County Registrar, the records of registration and is in receipt of that certain "Certificate as to
Verification of Signatures on Petition," from the Orange County Registrar, has examined such
certificate and has accepted as true and correct the findings contained therein and, thereby,
ascertained that the petition is signed by the requisite number of voters; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has not voted in favor of the adoption of the ordinance, and
is required by law to submit the same to the voters of the City of Costa Mesa.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true, correct, and adopted by the City Council as if
set forth 'in full.
SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating
to general law cities there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Costa Mesa, California
on a Special Municipal Election for the purpose of submitting the following proposed ordinance:
Measure _: Allow Operation of up to Eight Medical
Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to eight medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; one percent tax on other products; exemption
from permits; regulations not subject to change by City
Council except for increasing businesses; precedence to
No
prior businesses; and locations limited to commercial and
industrial areas, be adopted?
SECTION 3. That the proposed complete text of the ordinance submitted to the voters is
attached.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1
SECTION 4. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and content as
required by law.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to coordinate with
the County of Orange Registrar of Voters to procure and furnish any and all official ballots,
notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia that may be necessary in
order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
SECTION 6. That the polls for the election shall be open at 7 a.m. of the day of the election
and shall remain open continuously from that time until 8 p.m. of the same day when said polls
shall be closed, pursuant to Election Code Section 10242, except as provided in Section 14401
of the Elections Code of the State of California.
SECTION 7. That the Orange County Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass the
returns of the Special Municipal Election.
SECTION 8. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, said election shall be held
and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating special elections and the
holding of municipal elections.
SECTION 9. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City
Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give such further or additional notice of the
election, in the time, form, and manner required by law.
SECTION 10. The Costa Mesa City Council hereby requests that the Orange County
Registrar of Voters conduct all necessary services related to the Costa Mesa Special Municipal
Election. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10002, the Finance Director, or his/her designee,
is hereby authorized to reimburse the County for the actual cost incurred in conducting the
election upon receipt of a bill stating the amount due as determined by the elections official.
SECTION 11. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution
and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Costa Mesa on this 18Th day of November, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014, by the following
roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa
Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3
ATTACHMENT 10
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THE
PROPOSED MEASURE ENTITLED ALLOW OPERATION OF UP TO EIGHT
MEDICAL MARIJUANA BUSINESSES IN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA; SETTING
PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE MEASURE
AND, DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, a Special Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Costa Mesa,
California, on , at which there will be submitted to the voters the following
measure:
Measure —: Allow Operation of up to Eight Medical
Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to eight medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; one percent tax on other products; exemption from
permits; regulations not subject to change by City Council
except for increasing businesses; precedence to prior
No
businesses; and locations limited to commercial and industrial
areas, be adopted?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council affirms for measures placed on the ballot by
petition, the persons filing an initiative petition, pursuant to Elections Code 9282(a) may
file a written argument in favor of the ordinance, and the legislative body may submit an
argument against the ordinance.
SECTION 2. That the City Council authorizes ALL members of the City Council to
file (a) written argument(s) In Favor of or Against Measure as specified above not
exceeding 300 words, accompanied by the printed names(s) and signature(s) of the
author(s) submitting it, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections
Code of the State of California.
SECTION 3. The arguments may be changed orwithdrawn until and including the
date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the measure may be
submitted to the City Clerk.
The arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed name(s)
and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization,
the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its
principal officers who is the author of the argument. The arguments shall be accompanied
by the Form of Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument.
Resolution No, 14 -XX Page 1 of 3
SECTION 4. If more than one argument for a measure is received from individuals
or groups with the same preference and priority, the authors will be asked to witness a
random drawing by a designee of the city elections official to determine which argument
will be published.
SECTION 5. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the
measure to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office of the City
Attorney is affected. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the proposed
Ordinance not exceeding 500 words showing the effect of the measure on existing law
and the operation of the measure. If a measure affects the organization or salaries of the
office of the City Attorney, the City Clerk shall prepare the impartial analysis. The analysis
shall include a statement indicating whether the measure was placed on the ballot by a
petition signed by the requisite number of voters or by the governing body of the city. In
the event the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter
information portion of the sample ballot, there shall be printed immediately below the
impartial analysis, in no less than 10 -point type, the following: "The above statement is
an impartial analysis of Ordinance or Measure _. If you desire a copy of the ordinance
or measure, please call the election official's office at 714-754-5225 and a copy will be
mailed at no cost to you. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City
Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014,
by the following roil call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3 of 3
Attachment 1
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with § 9200) of
the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following farm statement to be signed by each
proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (primary/rebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the Special Municipal election for the City of Costa Mesa to be held on
hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their)
knowledge and belief.
Print Name
Iffirz
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Editor's Notes:
Signature
Date
Signature
Date
Signature
Date
Signature
Date
Signature
Date
All Authors must print his/her name and sign this form (EC 9500)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Argument itself (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Rebuttal Argument itself (EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shall be titled
either "Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Argument Against Measure _"
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either
"Rebuttal To Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure _"
Resolution No, 14 -XX I-
it
ATTACHMENT 11
RESOLUTION NO. 14 - XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR
PROPOSED MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, §9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes
the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for measures submitted at municipal elections.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State
of California, when the elections official has selected the arguments for and against
the measure which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the elections official
shall send a copy of an argument in favor of the proposition to the authors of any
argument against the measure and a copy of an argument against the measure to the
authors of any argument in favor of the measure immediately upon receiving the
arguments.
The author or a majority of the authors of an argument relating to a proposed
measure may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words or
may authorize in writing any other person or persons to prepare, submit, or sign the
rebuttal argument.
__--_-A__r_ebuttal-argur-hent-ma-y-not be-igned-by rtmore-than-five-author-s.--If-more than--------
five authors provide a signature to the rebuttal, then only the signatures of the first five
authors shall be printed to the exclusion of the excess signatures.
The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed
name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an
organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at
least one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing
direct arguments. The rebuttal arguments shall be accompanied by the Form of
Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument (Attachment 1). The rebuttal
arguments shall be filed by
Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct
arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument that it
seeks to rebut.
SECTION 2. That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for city measures are repealed.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1
SECTION 3. That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to
be held on , and shall then be repealed.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to submit the rebuttal
arguments, as described herein, in compliance with State law and to perform all duties
required of the elections official for the City of Costa Mesa.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
1, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City
--------------Council--of-the-City--of Co-st-a-Me-sa-at a-regul-ar--meeting--held-on--the--18-rh-day-of-----------
November, 2014, by the following roil call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seas of the
City of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2
Attachment 1
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with § 9200) of
the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following form statement to be signed by each
proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (primary/rebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the Special Municipal election for the City of Costa Mesa to be held on
, hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their)
knowledge and belief.
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Print Name
-Title---
Editor's Notes:
Signature.
Date
Signature.
Date
Signature_
Date
Signature_
Date
Signature_
All Authors must print his/her name and sign this „form, (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Argument itself (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Rebuttal Argument itself (EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shall be titled
either "Argument In Favor Of Measure —" or "Argument Against Measure _"
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either
"Rebuttal To Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure _"
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX ATTACHMENT 12 II'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE FOR THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
TO BE HELD ON , 2015, FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF A
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, pursuant to authority provided by statute a petition has been filed with the
legislative body of the City of Costa Mesa, California, signed by fifteen percent (15%) of the
number of registered voters of the city to submit a proposed ordinance entitled: Allow Operation
Of Up To Four Licensed Medical Marijuana Businesses In City of Costa Mesa;
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused to be examined, through the office of the Orange
County Registrar, the records of registration and is in receipt of that certain "Certificate as to
Verification of Signatures on Petition," from the Orange County Registrar, has examined such
certificate and has accepted as true and correct the findings contained therein and, thereby,
ascertained that the petition is signed by the requisite number of voters; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has not voted in favor of the adoption of the proposed
ordinance, and is required by law to submit the same to the voters of the City of Costa Mesa.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true, correct, and adopted by the City Council as if
set forth in full.
SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating
to general law cities there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Costa Mesa, California
on a Special Municipal Election for the purpose of submitting the following proposed ordinance:
Measure _: Allow Operation of up to Four Licensed
Medical Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa
Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to four medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; required industry specific licenses; required
operator permits; regulations subject to change by City
Council including increasing businesses; precedence to prior
No
businesses; and locations limited to commercial and
industrial areas, be adopted?
SECTION 3. That the proposed complete text of the ordinance submitted to the voters is
attached.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1
SECTION 4. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and content as
required by law.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to coordinate with
the County of Orange Registrar of Voters to procure and furnish any and all official ballots,
notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia that may be necessary in
order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
SECTION 8. That the polls for the election shall be open at 7 a.m. of the day of the election
and shall remain open continuously from that time until 8 p.m. of the same day when said polls
shall be closed, pursuant to Election Code Section 10242, except as provided in Section 14401
of the Elections Code of the State of California.
SECTION 7. That the Orange County Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass the
returns of the Special Municipal Election.
SECTION 8. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, said election shall be
held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating special elections and the
holding of municipal elections.
SECTION 9. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City
Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give such further or additional notice of the
election, in the time, form, and manner required by law.
SECTION 10. The Costa Mesa City Council hereby requests that the Orange County
Registrar of Voters conduct all necessary services related to the Costa Mesa Special Municipal
Election. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10002, the Finance Director, or his/her designee,
is-hiereby authorized --to -'reimburse the Coun-y-for the ac ud cost incurred in conducting the
election upon receipt of a bill stating the amount due as determined by the elections official.
SECTION 11. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution
and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Costa Mesa on this 18t" day of November, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
Resolution No, 14 -XX Page 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
1, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014, by the following
roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa
Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3
ATTACHMENT 13
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO ALLOW OPERATION OF UP TO FOUR LICENSED
MEDICAL MARIJUANA BUSINESSES IN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA; SETTING
PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE MEASURE
AND, DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, a Special Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Costa Mesa,
California, on , at which there will be submitted to the voters the following
measure:
Measure _: Allow Operation of up to Four Licensed
Medical Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa
Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to four medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; required industry specific licenses; required
operator permits; regulations subject to change by City
No
Council including increasing businesses; precedence to prior
businesses; and locations limited to commercial and industrial
areas, be adopted?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council affirms for measures placed on the ballot by
petition, the persons filing an initiative petition, pursuant to Elections Code 9282(a) may
file a written argument in favor of the ordinance, and the legislative body may submit an
argurrien against the ordinance. -- -
SECTION 2. That the City Council authorizes ALL members of the City Council to
file (a) written argument(s) In Favor of or Against City Measure as specified above not
exceeding 300 words, accompanied by the printed names(s) and signature(s) of the
author(s) submitting it, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections
Code of the State of California.
SECTION 3. The arguments may be changed or withdrawn until and including the
date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the measure may be
submitted to the City Clerk.
The arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed name(s)
and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization,
the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its
principal officers who is the author of the argument. The arguments shall be accompanied
by the Form of Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 3
SECTION 4. If more than one argument for a measure is received from individuals
or groups with the same preference and priority, the authors will be asked to witness a
random drawing by a designee of the city elections official to determine which argument
will be published.
SECTION 5. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the
measure to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office of the City
Attorney is affected. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the proposed
Ordinance not exceeding 500 words showing the effect of the measure on existing law
and the operation of the measure. If a measure affects the organization or salaries of the
office of the City Attorney, the City Clerk shall prepare the impartial analysis. The analysis
shall include a statement indicating whether the measure was placed on the ballot by a
petition signed by the requisite number of voters or by the governing body of the city. In
the event the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter
information portion of the sample ballot, there shall be printed immediately below the
impartial analysis, in no less than 10 -point type, the following: "The above statement is
an impartial analysis of Ordinance or Measure _. If you desire a copy of the ordinance
or measure, please call the election official's office at 714-754-5225 and a copy will be
mailed at no cost to you. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City
Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3 of 3
Attachment 1
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with § 9200) of
the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following form statement to be signed by each
proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (primarylrebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the Special Municipal election for the City of Costa Mesa to be held on
, hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their)
knowledge and belief.
Print Name Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature.
Title
Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Editor's Notes:
Ail Authors must print his/her name and sign this form (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Argument itself (EC 9.283)
AND
Print his/her name and siqn the Rebuttal Argument „itself (EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shall be titled
either "Argument In Favor Of Measure —" or "Argument Against Measure _"
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either
"Rebuttal To Argument In Favor Of Measure —" or "Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure ".
Resolution No. 14. -XX
i
ATTACHMENT 14
RESOLUTION NO. 14 - XX
A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA IVIE.SA,
CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR
PROPOSED MEASURES SUBMITTED AT IVIUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, §9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes
the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for measures submitted at municipal elections.
NOW, THEREF=ORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 92.85 of the Elections Code of the State
of California, when the elections official has selected the arguments for and against
the measure which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the elections official
shall send a copy of an argument in favor of the proposition to the authors of any
argument against the measure and a copy of an argument against the measure to the
authors of any argument in favor of the measure immediately upon receiving the
arguments.
The author or a majority of the authors of an argument relating to a proposed
measure may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words or
may authorize in writing any other person or persons to prepare, submit, or sign the
rebuttal argument.
_.. _ ,.. _ _.-------_.._ r_e u'lta argument rnay.r�ot_be sig��ed-by more than-five--�uti�ors: lf-r��or`e than_, .
five authors provide a signature to the rebuttal, then only the signatures of the first five
authors shall be printed to the exclusion of the excess signatures.
The rebuttal arguments shali be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed
name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an
organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at
least one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing
direct arguments. The rebuttal arguments shall be accornpanied by the f=orm of
Statement To Be Filed 3y Author(s) of Argument (Attachment 1). The rebuttal
arguments shall be filed by
Rebuttai arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct
arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument that it
seeks to rebut.
SECTION 2. That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for city measures are repealed.
Resolution No, 14 -XX Page 1
SECTION 3. That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to
be held on , and shall then be repealed,
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to submit the rebuttal
arguments, as described herein, in compliance with State law and to perform all duties
required of the elections official for the City of Costa Mesa.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City
_ Councilo __ `ie City o Costa Mesa a.. a i egulai' meeting held on the 18ti; day of
November, 2014, by the following roll cal! vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Costa Mesa this 19tH day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2
Attachment 1
'ORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTH'ORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with § 9200) of
the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following form statement to be signed by each
proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
The undersigned proponent (s) or auth0r(s) of the (primarylrebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) bailot
proposition (name or number) at the Special Municipal election for the City of Costa Mesa to be held on
hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their)
Knowledge and belief.
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Flame Signature
Title Date
Print Name _ Signature
Title nate
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Editor's Notes;
Signature
Date
_ _„_Signature
Date
All Authors must print his/her name and sign this form (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and sign th�ment iiscif (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign fhe l�ebuttai Arqurnent itself {EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shall be fitted
either "Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Argument Against Measure
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments subn-iitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either
"Rebuttal To Argument In f=avor 01 Measure " or "rebuttal to Argument Against Measure "
Resolution No. 14. -XX Page 3
ATTACH M ENT 151
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE FOR THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON , 2015 ORDERING THE
SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA A
MEASURE RELATING TO A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH REGULATION
OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES AND REGULATION OF MEDICAL
MARIJUANA CULTIVATION
WHEREAS, in 1996 the California voters approved Proposition 215 (known as the
Compassionate Use Act (the "CUA") and codified as Health and Safety Code Section
11362.5 et seq.) to exempt certain patients and their primary caregivers from criminal
liability under state law for the possession and cultivation of marijuana for medical
purposes; and
WHEREAS, in 2003 the California legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 (known as
the Medical Marijuana Program Act (the "MMPA") and codified as Health and Safety Code
Section 11362.7 et seq.), as later amended, to clarify the scope of the Compassionate
Use Act relating to the possession and cultivation of marijuana for medical purpose, and
to authorize local governing bodies to adopt and enforce laws consistent with its
provisions; and
WHEREAS, in 2005 the California Board of Equalization began issuing seller's
permits for sales consisting only of medical marijuana; and
WHEREAS, in 2008 the California Attorney General issued guidelines for the
security and non -diversion of marijuana grown for medical use; and
WHEREAS, in 2014 the U.S. House of Representatives voted to stop federal law
enforcement from interfering with medical marijuana operations in the various states
which- ave-dec-riminalized andlor authorized such operations; and
WHEREAS, Health & Safety Code Section 11362.83 provides that cities are free
to adopt and enforce local ordinances that regulate the location, operation, or
establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa intends that nothing in this
Ordinance shall be deemed to conflict with federal law as contained in the Controlled
Substances Act, nor to otherwise permit any activity that is prohibited under that Act or
other applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa intends that nothing in this
Ordinance shall be construed to allow persons to engage in conduct that endangers
others or causes a public nuisance, to allow the use of marijuana for non-medical
purposes, or to allow any activity relating to the cultivation, distribution or consumption of
marijuana that is otherwise illegal; and
WHEREAS, the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries and the cultivation of
medical marijuana within the City of Costa Mesa presently remains prohibited and
unregulated; and
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 4
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa finds that medical marijuana
operations and cultivation require careful consideration, as does the regulation of the
location and manner in which dispensaries operate and cultivation occurs, so as to
prevent negative impacts on nearby residents and businesses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa finds that the City of Costa
Mesa has a compelling interest in protecting the public health, safety and welfare of its
residents and businesses by regulating the location and operation of medical marijuana
dispensaries and medical marijuana cultivation, in preserving the peace and quiet of the
neighborhoods in which medical marijuana dispensaries operate and medical marijuana
is cultivated, and in providing compassionate access to medical marijuana to its seriously
ill residents; and
WHEREAS, the California Constitution grants local governments in Article XI,
Section 7 the authority under their police powers to regulate land use; and
WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance has been reviewed by City staff in
accordance with the Environmental Checklist Form (Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines)
to determine if there would be any possibility that the proposed ordinance would have the
possibility of creating any environmental impacts, and City staff has determined that the
establishment of regulations for medical marijuana businesses does not meet any of the
thresholds contained in the Checklist that would trigger an environmental impact, and
thus according to the "general rule exemption" (Section 15061 (b)(3)) of the CEQA
Guidelines, projects which have no potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment are not subject to CEQA, no further environmental analysis is required, and
a notice of exemption will be filed;
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to submit to the voters of the City, AT A
Special Municipal Election to be held on proposed Ordinance No. 14 -XX to
establish regulation of medical marijuana dispensaries and regulation of medical
marijuana cultivation;
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by the law of the State of California to
submit the proposed ordinance to the voters;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true, correct, and adopted by the City
Council as if set forth in full.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 4
SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of
California relating to general law cities there is called and ordered to be held in the City
of Costa Mesa, California on a Special Municipal Election for the purpose
of submitting the following proposed ordinance:
Measure—: Establish Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Dispensaries and Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Cultivation
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow general operation of medical
marijuana businesses with: required dispensary permits;
Yes
required cultivator permits; requirement to allow City
inspections; mandatory security cameras; requirement to
No
maintain business records; City Office of Cultivation Standards
and Quality Control; regulations subject to amendment by City
Council; and locations limited to commercial and industrial
areas, be adopted?
SECTION 3. That the proposed complete text of the ordinance submitted to the
voters is attached, being Ordinance No. 14 -XX.
SECTION 4. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and
content as required by law.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to
coordinate with the County of Orange Registrar of Voters to procure and furnish any and
all official ballots, notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia
that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
SECTION 6. That the polls for the election shall be open at 7 a.m. of the day of
the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until 8 p.m. of the same
day when said polls shall be closed, pursuant to Election Code Section 10242, except as
provided in Section 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California.
SECTION 7. That the Orange County Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass
the returns of the Special Municipal Election.
SECTION 8. The ballot measure shall not take effect, unless and until the ballot
measure receives the approval of a majority of the votes cast by the voters of the City
voting upon the ballot measure at the special municipal election.
SECTION 9. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election will be
held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating special elections
and the holding of municipal elections.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3 of 4
SECTION 10. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and
the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of
the election, in time, form and manner as required by law.
SECTION 11. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON November 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
i, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
._.COUNCIL -MEMBER -S:._... _... .
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 4 of 4
ATTACHMENT 16
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE WHICH WOULD ESTABLISH REGULATION OF
MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES AND REGULATION OF MEDICAL
MARIJUANA CULTIVATION IN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA; SETTING PRIORITIES
FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE MEASURE AND,
DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, a Special Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Costa Mesa,
California, on , at which there will be submitted to the voters the following
measure,
Measure—: Establish Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Dispensaries and Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Cultivation
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow general operation of medical
marijuana businesses with: required dispensary permits;
Yes
required cultivator permits; requirement to allow City
inspections; mandatory security cameras; requirement to
No
maintain business records; City Office of Cultivation Standards
and Quality Control; regulations subject to amendment by City
Council; and locations limited to commercial and industrial
areas, be adopted?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
-- -- -- ........... .._.
SECTION 1. That the City Council authorizes ALL members of the City Council to
file (a) written argument(s) In Favor of or Against City Measure as specified above not
exceeding 300 words, accompanied by the printed names(s) and signature(s) of the
author(s) submitting it, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections
Code of the State of California. The arguments may be changed or withdrawn until and
including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the City
measure may be submitted to the City Clerk.
The arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed name(s)
and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization,
the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its
principal officers who is the author of the argument. The arguments shall be accompanied
by the Form of Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument.
SECTION 2. If more than one argument for a measure is received from individuals
or groups with the same preference and priority, the authors will be asked to witness a
random drawing by a designee of the city elections official to determine which argument
will be published.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 2
SECTION 3. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the
measure to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office of the City
Attorney is affected. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure
not exceeding 500 words showing the effect of the measure on existing law and the
operation of the measure. If a measure affects the organization or salaries of the office of
the City Attorney, the City Clerk shall prepare the impartial analysis. The analysis shall
include a statement indicating whether the measure was placed on the ballot by a petition
signed by the requisite number of voters or by the governing body of the city. In the event
the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information
portion of the sample ballot, there shall be printed immediately below the impartial
analysis, in no less than 10 -point type, the following: "The above statement is an impartial
analysis of Ordinance or Measure . If you desire a copy of the ordinance or measure,
please call the election official's office at 714-754-5225 and a copy will be mailed at no
cost to you. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the
filing of primary arguments.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
-COUNTY -OP-ORANGE
ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18TH day of November, 2016,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014,
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 2
Attachment 1
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with § 9200) of
the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following form statement to be signed by each
proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (primary/rebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the Special Municipal election for the City of Costa Mesa to be held on
hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their)
knowledge and belief.
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Print Name
Title
Signature
Date
Signature,
Date
Signature.
Date
Signature_
Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date
E=ditor's Notes:
All Authors must print his/her name and sign this form (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Argument itself (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Rebuttal Argument „itself (EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shalt be titled
either "Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Argument Against Measure _"
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either
"Rebuttal To Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure _"
Resolution No. 14 -XX
ATTACH M ENT 17
RESOLUTION NO. 14 - XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR
PROPOSED MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, §9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes
the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for measures submitted at municipal elections.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS -
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State
of California, when the elections official has selected the arguments for and against
the measure which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the elections official
shall send a copy of an argument in favor of the proposition to the authors of any
argument against the measure and a copy of an argument against the measure to the
authors of any argument in favor of the measure immediately upon receiving the
arguments.
The author or a majority of the authors of an argument relating to a proposed
measure may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words or
may authorize in writing any other person or persons to prepare, submit, or sign the
rebuttal argument.
--re -utta I _argum-erit- may- not--b-e signed -by more -than five authors:- -If-more than _
five authors provide a signature to the rebuttal, then only the signatures of the first five
authors shall be printed to the exclusion of the excess signatures.
The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed
name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an
organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at
least one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing
direct arguments. The rebuttal arguments shall be accompanied by the Form of
Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument (Attachment 1). The rebuttal
arguments shall be filed by
Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct
arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument that it
seeks to rebut.
SECTION 2. That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for city measures are repealed.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1
SECTION 3. That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to
be held on and shall then be repealed.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to submit the rebuttal
arguments, as described herein, in compliance with State law and to perform all duties
required of the elections official for the City of Costa Mesa,
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014,
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City
Council of -the City of --Costa Mesa --ata regular meeting held on the 18tfi day of
November, 2014, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
I1I1367c[.911
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Costa Mesa this 19' day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2
Attachment 1
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with § 9200) of
the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following form statement to be signed by each
proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (prlmary/rebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the Special Municipal election for the City of Costa Mesa to be held on
hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their)
knowledge and belief.
Print Name
Title
Signature
Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name Signature.
Title r),+ -
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name
Title
Editor's Notes:
_Signature
Date
All Authors must print his/her name and sign this form (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and si n the Argument itself (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Rebuttal Ar ument itself (EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shall be tided
either "Argument In Favor Of Measure or "Argument Against Measure ".
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 snail be titled either
"Rebuttal To Argument in Favor Of Measure _" or `Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure ".
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3
ATTACHMENT 18
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
REQUESTING THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO CONSOLIDATE A
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 8, 2016, WITH THE
STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE PURSUANT TO
SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa called a General Municipal Election to be
held on November 8, 2016 for the purpose of submitting proposed ordinances to the voters of the City
of Costa Mesa for their consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa is submitting to the voters of the City of
Costa Mesa questions relating to the adoption of proposed ordinances; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the general municipal election be consolidated with the Statewide
General election to be held on the same date and that within the city, the precincts, polling places,
and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the Registrar of Voters of the
County of Orange canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election
be held in all respects as if there were only one election;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
------- ---------SECTION 1 That pursuant-to--the--requirements-of-Section 10403-of--the-Elections-Code!-the- -
Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange is hereby requested to consent and agree to the
consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday,
November 8, 2016, for the purpose of submitting to the voters of the City of Costa Mesa questions
relating to the adoption of proposed ordinances.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1
SECTION 2. That the following measures are to appear on the ballot as follows:
Measure _: Allow Operation of up to Eight Medical
Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to eight medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; one percent tax on other products; exemption
from permits; regulations not subject to change by City
No
Council except for increasing businesses; precedence to
No
prior businesses; and locations limited to commercial and
industrial areas, be adopted?
2
Measure _: Allow Operation of up to Four Licensed
Medical Marijuana Businesses in the City of
Costa Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to four medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana,- required industry specific licenses; required
operator permits; regulations subject to change by City
No
Council including increasing businesses; precedence to
No
prior businesses; and locations limited to commercial and
industrial areas, be adopted?
... ..... .....
Measure —: Establish Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Dispensaries and Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Cultivation
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow general operation of medical
marijuana businesses with: required dispensary permits;
Yes
required cultivator permits; requirement to allow City
inspections; mandatory security cameras; requirement to
No
maintain business records; City Office of Cultivation
Standards and Quality Control; regulations subject to
amendment by City Council; and locations limited to
commercial and industrial areas, be adopted?
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2
SECTION 3. That the County of Orange Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass the returns
of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one
election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. The election will be held and conducted in
accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide election.
SECTION 4. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the county
election department to take any and all steps necessary to hold the consolidated election.
SECTION 5. That the City of Costa Mesa recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the
County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the
Board of Supervisors and county election department of the County of Orange.
SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2014,
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
1, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14. -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014, by the following roll call
vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX A17ACH M ENT 19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE FOR THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2016 FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS
OF A PROPOSED MEASURE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, pursuant to authority provided by statute a petition has been filed with the
legislative body of the City of Costa Mesa, California, signed by fifteen percent (15%) of the
number of registered voters of the city to submit a proposed ordinance entitled: Allow Operation
of up to Eight Medical Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa Mesa; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused to be examined, through -the office of the Orange
County Registrar, the records of registration and is in receipt of that certain "Certificate as to
Verification of Signatures on Petition," from the Orange County Registrar, has examined such
certificate and has accepted as true and correct the findings contained therein and, thereby,
ascertained that the petition is signed by the requisite number of voters; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has not voted in favor of the adoption of the ordinance, and
is required by law to submit the same to the voters of the City of Costa Mesa.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true, correct, and adopted by the City Council as if
set forth in full.
SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating
to general law cities there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Costa Mesa, California
on November 8, 2016 a General Municipal Election for the purpose of submitting the following
proposed ordinance:
Measure —: Allow Operation of up to Eight Medical
Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to eight medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; one percent tax on other products; exemption
from permits, regulations not subject to change by City
Council except for increasing businesses; precedence to
No
prior businesses; and locations limited to commercial and
industrial areas, be adopted?
SECTION 3, That the proposed complete text of the ordinance submitted to the voters is
attached.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1
SECTION 4. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and content as
required by law.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to coordinate with
the County of Orange Registrar of Voters to procure and furnish any and all official ballots,
notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia that may be necessary in
order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
SECTION 6. That the polls for the election shall be open at 7 a.m. of the day of the election
and shall remain open continuously from that time until 8 p.m. of the same day when said polls
shall be closed, pursuant to Election Code Section 10242, except as provided in Section 14401
of the Elections Code of the State of California.
SECTION 7. That the Orange County Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass the
returns of the General Municipal Election.
SECTION 8. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, said election shall be held
and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide election.
SECTION 9. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City
Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give such further or additional notice of the
election, in the time, form, and manner required by law.
SECTION 10. The Costa Mesa City Council hereby requests that the Orange County
Registrar of Voters conduct all necessary services related to the Costa Mesa General Municipal
Election. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10002, the Finance Director, or his/her designee,
is hereby authorized to reimburse the County for the actual cost incurred in conducting the
.................
e ection -upon-receipt-of a bill stating the -amount due as-dotermined by the elections -official.- -
SECTION 11. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution
and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Costa Mesa on this 18th day of November, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014, by the Following
roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the sea[ of the City of Costa
Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3
ATTACHMENT 20
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO ALLOW OPERATION OF UP TO EIGHT MEDICAL
MARIJUANA BUSINESSES IN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA; SETTING PRIORITIES
FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE MEASURE AND,
DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Costa Mesa,
California, on November 8, 2016, at which there will be submitted to the voters the
following proposed measure:
Measure _. Allow Operation of up to Eight Medical
Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to eight medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; one percent tax on other products; exemption from
permits; regulations not subject to change by City Council
except for increasing businesses; precedence to prior
No
businesses; and locations limited to commercial and industrial
areas, be adopted?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council affirms for measures placed on the ballot by
petition, the persons filing an initiative petition, pursuant to Flections Code 9282(x) may
file a written argument in favor of the ordinance, and the legislative body may submit an
argument against the ordinance.
SECTION 2. That the City Council authorizes ALL members of the City Council to
file (a) written argument(s) In Favor of or Against Measure as specified above not
exceeding 300 words, accompanied by the printed names(s) and signature(s) of the
author(s) submitting it, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections
Code of the State of California. The arguments may be changed or withdrawn until and
including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the City
measure may be submitted to the City Clerk.
SECTION 3. The arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the
printed name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf
of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of
at least one of its principal officers who is the author of the argument. The arguments
shall be accompanied by the Form of Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument.
SECTION 4. If more than one argument for a measure is received from individuals
or groups with the same preference and priority, the authors will be asked to witness a
random drawing by a designee of the city elections official to determine which argument
will be published.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 2
SECTION 5. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the
measure to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office of the City
Attorney is affected. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure
not exceeding 500 words showing the effect of the measure on existing law and the
operation of the measure. If a measure affects the organization or salaries of the office of
the City Attorney, the City Clerk shall prepare the impartial analysis. The analysis shall
include a statement indicating whether the measure was placed on the ballot by a petition
signed by the requisite number of voters or by the governing body of the city. In the event
the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information
portion of the sample ballot, there shall be printed immediately below the impartial
analysis, in no less than 10 -point type, the following: "The above statement is an impartial
analysis of Ordinance or Measure . If you desire a copy of the ordinance or measure,
please call the election official's office at 714-754-5225 and a copy will be mailed at no
cost to you. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the
filing of primary arguments.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST.
Brenda Green, City Clerk
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
1, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 2
2014 California Municipal Elections Handbook
ARGUMENTS
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with
§ 9200) of the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following form statement to be
signed by each proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
Forms
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (primary/rebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the (title of election) election for the (jurisdiction) to be held on ,
2 hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their) knowledge and belief.
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Editor's Notes:
All Authors must print his/her name and sign this form (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Argument itself (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Rebuttal Argument itself (EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shall be titled either
"Argument In Favor Of Measure —" or "Argument Against Measure".
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either "Rebuttal
To Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure _".
§ 9600, E.C.
(Revised 10/09)
Give this form to Council Members, Proponents, and Opponents of Measures
Statement of Authors of Arguments
F - A - 1
Martin & Chapman Co.
www.martiiichapmari.coni (10/16/2013) Forms
Page 8 - F
ATTACHMENT 21
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR
MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California
authorizes the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for measures submitted at municipal elections;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of
California, when the elections official has selected the arguments for and against the
measure which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the elections official shall send
a copy of an argument in favor of the proposition to the authors of any argument against
the measure and a copy of an argument against the measure to the authors of any
argument in favor of the measure immediately upon receiving the arguments.
The author or a majority of the authors of an argument relating to a city measure
may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words or may authorize
in writing any other person or persons to prepare, submit or sign the rebuttal argument.
A rebuttal argument may not be signed by more than five authors. If more than
five authors provide a signature to the rebuttal, then only the signatures of the first five
authors shall be printed to the exclusion of the excess signatures.
- The -rebuttal arguments- shall--be-filed-with the Gity-Clerk, signedl -with-the- printed -
name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an
organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least
one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing direct
arguments. The rebuttal arguments shall be accompanied by the Form of Statement To
Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument (Attachment 1). The rebuttal arguments shall be filed
by
Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct arguments.
Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to
rebut.
SECTION 2. That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for city measures are repealed.
SECTION 3. That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to be
held on November 8, 2016 and shall then be repealed.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 2
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to submit the rebuttal
arguments, as described herein, in compliance with State law and to perform all duties
required of the elections official for the City of Costa Mesa.
Section 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON November 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
- AYES:.. COUNCIL--. MEMBERS;
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 191h Day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 2
2014 California Municipal Elections Handbook
ARGUMENTS
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with
§ 9200) of the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following form statement to be
signed by each proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
Forms
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (primary/rebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the (title of election) election for the (jurisdiction) to be held on ,
2 hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their) knowledge and belief.
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature 4
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Editor's Notes:
All Authors must print his/her name and sign _this _form (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Argument itself, (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Rebuttal Argument itself (EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shall be titled either
"Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Argument Against Measure
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either "Rebuttal
To Argument In Favor Of Measure —" or "Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure _".
§ 9600, E.C.
(Revised 10/09)
Give this form to Council Members, Proponents, and Opponents of Measures
Statement of Authors of Arguments
F - A - 1
Martin & Chapman Co.
www.martinchapman.com (10/16/2013) Forms
Page 8 - F
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
ATTACHMENT 22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE FOR THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2016, FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS
OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA HERESY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, pursuant to authority provided by statute a petition has been filed with the
legislative body of the City of Costa Mesa, California, signed by fifteen percent (15%) of the
number of registered voters of the city to submit a proposed ordinance entitled: Allow
Operation Of Up To Four Licensed Medical Marijuana Businesses In City of Costa Mesa;
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has caused to be examined, through the office of the Orange
County Registrar, the records of registration and is in receipt of that certain "Certificate as to
Verification of Signatures on Petition," from the Orange County Registrar, has examined such
certificate and has accepted as true and correct the findings contained therein and, thereby,
ascertained that the petition is signed by the requisite number of voters; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has not voted in favor of the adoption of the ordinance, and
is required by law to submit the same to the voters of the City of Costa Mesa.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true, correct, and adopted by the City Council as if
set forth in full.
SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws ofFthe State of California relating
to general law cities there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Costa Mesa, California
on November 8, 2016 a General Municipal Election for the purpose of submitting the following
proposed ordinance:
Measure —: Allow Operation of up to Four Licensed
Medical Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa
Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to four medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; required industry specific licenses; required
operator permits; regulations subject to change by City
No
Council including increasing businesses; precedence to prior
businesses; and locations limited to commercial and
industrial areas, be adopted?
SECTION 3. That the proposed complete text of the ordinance submitted to the voters is
attached.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1
SECTION 4. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and content as
required by law.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to coordinate with
the County of Orange Registrar of Voters to procure and furnish any and all official ballots,
notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia that may be necessary in
order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
SECTION 6. That the polls for the election shall be open at 7 a.m. of the day of the election
and shall remain open continuously from that time until 8 p.m. of the same day when said polls
shall be closed, pursuant to Election Code Section 10242, except as provided in Section 14401
of the Elections Code of the State of California.
SECTION 7. That the Orange County Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass the
returns of the General Municipal Election.
SECTION 8. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, said election shall be held
and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide election.
SECTION 9. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City
Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give such further or additional notice of the
election, in the time, form, and manner required by law.
SECTION 10. The Costa Mesa City Council hereby requests that the Orange County
Registrar of Voters conduct all necessary services related to the Costa Mesa General Municipal
Election. Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10002, the Finance Director, or his/her designee,
is hereby authorized to reimburse the County for the actual cost incurred in conducting the
e lection upon receipt --of a bill -stating the amount due as determined by the elections official.
SECTION 11. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Costa Mesa on this 18th day of November, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA }
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014, by the following
roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa
Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3
ATTACHMENT 23
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THE
PROPOSED MEASURE TO ALLOW OPERATION OF UP TO FOUR LICENSED
MEDICAL MARIJUANA BUSINESSES IN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA; SETTING
PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE MEASURE
AND, DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Costa Mesa,
California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2018, at which there will be submitted to the voters
the following measure:
Measure _: Allow Operation of up to Four Licensed
Medical Marijuana Businesses in the City of Costa
Mesa
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow operation of up to four medical
marijuana businesses with: six percent tax on medical
Yes
marijuana; required industry specific licenses; required
operator permits; regulations subject to change by City
No
Council including increasing businesses; precedence to prior
businesses; and locations limited to commercial and industrial
areas, be adopted?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council affirms for measures placed on the ballot by
petition, the persons filing an initiative petition, pursuant to Elections Code 9282(a) may
file a written argument in favor of the ordinance, and the legislative body may submit an
argument against the ordinance.
SECTION 2. That the City Council authorizes ALL members of the City Council to
file (a) written argument(s) In Favor of or Against Measure as specified above not
exceeding 300 words, accompanied by the printed names(s) and signature(s) of the
author(s) submitting it, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections
Code of the State of California. The arguments may be changed or withdrawn until and
including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the City
measure may be submitted to the City Clerk.
SECTION 3. The arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the
printed name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf
of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of
at least one of its principal officers who is the author of the argument. The arguments
shall be accompanied by the Form of Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument.
SECTION 4. If more than one argument for a measure is received from individuals
or groups with the same preference and priority, the authors will be asked to witness a
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 3
random drawing by a designee of the city elections official to determine which argument
will be published.
SECTION 5. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the
proposed ordinance to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office
of the City Attorney is affected. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of
the measure not exceeding 500 words showing the effect of the measure on existing law
and the operation of the measure. If a measure affects the organization or salaries of the
office of the City Attorney, the City Clerk shall prepare the impartial analysis. The analysis
shall include a statement indicating whether the measure was placed on the ballot by a
petition signed by the requisite number of voters or by the governing body of the city. In
the event the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter
information portion of the sample ballot, there shall be printed immediately below the
impartial analysis, in no less than 10 -point type, the following: "The above statement is
an impartial analysis of Ordinance or Measure _. If you desire a copy of the ordinance
or measure, please call the election official's office at 714-754-5225 and a copy will be
mailed at no cost to you. The impartial analysis shall be filed by the date set by the City
Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda reen, City .. er . - .. - . - on-mas.. Duarte, City Attorney -
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seas of the City
of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENT 24
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR
MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, Section 9288 of the Elections Code of the State of California
authorizes the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for measures submitted at municipal elections;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS;
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 9288 of the Elections Code of the State of
California, when the elections official has selected the arguments for and against the
measure which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the elections official shall send
a copy of an argument in favor of the proposition to the authors of any argument against
the measure and a copy of an argument against the measure to the authors of any
argument in favor of the measure immediately upon receiving the arguments.
The author or a majority of the authors of an argument relating to a city measure
may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words or may authorize
in writing any other person or persons to prepare, submit or sign the rebuttal argument.
A rebuttal argument may not be signed by more than five authors. If more than
five authors provide a signature to the rebuttal, then only the signatures of the first five
authors shall be printed to the exclusion of the excess signatures.
- e_reb-uttal- arguments shall -be--filed- with- the -City Clerk, signed, witfl the printed
name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an
organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least
one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing direct
arguments. The rebuttal arguments shall be accompanied by the Form of Statement To
Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument (Attachment 1). The rebuttal arguments shall be filed
by
Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct arguments.
Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to
rebut.
SECTION 2. That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for city measures are repealed.
SECTION 3. That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to be
held on November 8, 2016 and shall then be repealed.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 2
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to submit the rebuttal
arguments, as described herein, in compliance with State law and to perform all duties
required of the elections official for the City of Costa Mesa.
Section 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON November 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
1, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18t" day of November, 2014,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
-AYES: -COUNCIL- MEMBERS: -
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 1 gth Day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 2
2014 California Municipal Elections Handbook
ARGUMENTS
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with
§ 9200) of the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following form statement to be
signed by each proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
Forms
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (primary/rebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the (title of election) election for the (jurisdiction) to be held on
2 hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their) knowledge and belief.
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Print Name
Signature
Title
Editor's Notes:
All Authors must print his/her name and sign this form (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and -sign the Argument itself (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Rebuttal Argument „itself (EC 9265)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shali be titled either
"Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Argument Against Measure _".
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either "Rebuttal
To Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure _".
§ 9600, E.C.
(Revised 10/09)
Give this form to Council Members, Proponents, and Opponents of Measures
Statement of Authors of Arguments
F - A - 1
Martin & Chapman Co.
www.m2rlin0hapME10.00m {10/1 G/2013} Forms
ATTACHMENT 25
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA A MEASURE RELATING TO A PROPOSED ORDINANCE
TO ESTABLISH REGULATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES AND
REGULATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION
WHEREAS, in 1996 the California voters approved Proposition 215 (known as
the Compassionate Use Act (the "CUA") and codified as Health and Safety Code
Section 11362.5 et seq.) to exempt certain patients and their primary caregivers from
criminal liability under state law for the possession and cultivation of marijuana for
medical purposes; and
WHEREAS, in 2003 the California legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 (known as
the Medical Marijuana Program Act (the "MMPA") and codified as Health and Safety
Code Section 11362.7 et seq.), as later amended, to clarify the scope of the
Compassionate Use Act relating to the possession and cultivation of marijuana for
medical purpose, and to authorize local governing bodies to adopt and enforce laws
consistent with its provisions; and
WHEREAS, in 2005 the California Board of Equalization began issuing seller's
permits for sales consisting only of medical marijuana; and
WHEREAS, in 2008 the California Attorney General issued guidelines for the
security and non -diversion of marijuana grown for medical use; and
WHEREAS, in 2014 the U.S. House of Representatives voted to stop federal law
enforcement from interfering with medical marijuana operations in the various states
which have decriminalized and/or authorized such operations, and
- - - WHEREAS-, Health &-Safety-Code-Section-11-362.83--p-rovides-that-cities-are-fre-e
to adopt and enforce local ordinances that regulate the location, operation, or
establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa intends that nothing in
this Ordinance shall be deemed to conflict with federal law as contained in the
Controlled Substances Act, nor to otherwise permit any activity that is prohibited under
that Act or other applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa intends that nothing in
this Ordinance shall be construed to allow persons to engage in conduct that endangers
others or causes a public nuisance, to allow the use of marijuana for non-medical
purposes, or to allow any activity relating to the cultivation, distribution or consumption
of marijuana that is otherwise illegal; and
WHEREAS, the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries and the cultivation
of medical marijuana within the City of Costa Mesa presently remains prohibited and
unregulated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa finds that medical
marijuana operations and cultivation require careful consideration, as does the
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 4
regulation of the location and manner in which dispensaries operate and cultivation
occurs, so as to prevent negative impacts on nearby residents and businesses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa finds that the City of
Costa Mesa has a compelling interest in protecting the public health, safety and welfare
of its residents and businesses by regulating the location and operation of medical
marijuana dispensaries and medical marijuana cultivation, in preserving the peace and
quiet of the neighborhoods in which medical marijuana dispensaries operate and
medical marijuana is cultivated, and in providing compassionate access to medical
marijuana to its seriously ill residents; and
WHEREAS, the California Constitution grants local governments in Article XI,
Section 7 the authority under their police powers to regulate land use; and
WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance has been reviewed by City staff in
accordance with the Environmental Checklist Form (Appendix G of the CEQA
Guidelines) to determine if there would be any possibility that the proposed ordinance
would have the possibility of creating any environmental impacts, and City staff has
determined that the establishment of regulations for medical marijuana businesses does
not meet any of the thresholds contained in the Checklist that would trigger an
environmental impact, and thus according to the "general rule exemption" (Section
15061(b)(3)) of the CEQA Guidelines, projects which have no potential for causing a
significant effect on the environment are not subject to CEQA, no further environmental
analysis is required, and a notice of exemption will be filed;
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to submit to the voters of the City, at a
General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2016 proposed Ordinance No. 14 -
XX to establish regulation of medical marijuana dispensaries and regulation of medical
marijuana cultivation;
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by the law of the State of California to
-submit the -proposed -ordinance -to -the voters
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 4
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true, correct, and adopted by the City
Council as if set forth in full.
SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of
California relating to general law cities there is called and ordered to be held in the City
of Costa Mesa, California on November 8, 2016, a General Municipal Election for the
purpose of submitting the following proposed ordinance:
Measure _: Establish Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Dispensaries and Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Cultivation
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow general operation of medical
marijuana businesses with: required dispensary permits;
Yes
required cultivator permits; requirement to allow City
inspections; mandatory security cameras; requirement to
No
maintain business records; City Office of Cultivation Standards
and Quality Control; regulations subject to amendment by City
Council; and locations limited to commercial and industrial
areas, be adopted?
SECTION 3. That the proposed complete text of the ordinance submitted to the
voters is attached, being Ordinance No. 14 -XX.
SECTION 4. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and
content as required by law.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to
U6 -o nd inate With - r e oun y o - range egistrar o Voters to procure and furnish any and
all official ballots, notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia
that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
SECTION 6. That the polls for the election shall be open at 7 a.m. of the day of
the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until 8 p.m. of the same
day when said polls shall be closed, pursuant to Election Code Section 10242, except as
provided in Section 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California.
SECTION 7. That the Orange County Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass
the returns of the General Municipal Election.
SECTION 8. The ballot measure shall not take effect, unless and until the ballot
measure receives the approval of a majority of the votes cast by the voters of the City
voting upon the ballot measure at the November 8, 2016 general municipal election.
SECTION 9. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall
be held and conducted as provided by law and in accordance with the provisions of law
regulating the statewide election.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3 of 4
SECTION 10. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and
the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of
the election, in time, form and manner as required by law.
SECTION 11. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON November 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA }
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
....._.AYES... _- COUNCIL. MEMBERS.... _ ..
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 4 of 4
ATTACHMENT 26
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS
REGARDING A CITY MEASURE RELATING TO A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO
ESTABLISH REGULATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES AND
REGULATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION; AND, DIRECTING THE CITY
ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS FOR THE SAME CITY
MEASURE
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Costa Mesa,
California, on November 8, 2016 at which there will be submitted to the voters the
following measure:
Measure _: Establish Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Dispensaries and Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Cultivation
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance, to allow general operation of medical
marijuana businesses with: required dispensary permits;
Yes
required cultivator permits; requirement to allow City
inspections; mandatory security cameras; requirement to
No
maintain business records; City Office of Cultivation Standards
and Quality Control; regulations subject to amendment by City
Council; and locations limited to commercial and industrial
areas, be adopted?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1__ That the City Council authorizes ALL members of the City Council to
file written arguments in Favor of or Against City measures not exceeding 300 words,
accompanied by the printed names and signatures of the authors submitting it, in
accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of
California. The arguments may be changed or withdrawn until and including the date fixed
by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against the City measures may be
submitted to the City Clerk.
The arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed name(s)
and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization,
the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its
principal officers who is the author of the argument. The arguments shall be accompanied
by the Form of Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument.
SECTION 2. If more than one argument for a measure is received from individuals
or groups with the same preference and priority, the authors will be asked to witness a
random drawing by a designee of the city elections official to determine which argument
will be published.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 3
SECTION 3. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the
measures to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office of the City
Attorney is affected. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of a City
measure which relates to a proposed ordinance to establish regulation of medical
marijuana dispensaries and medical marijuana cultivation, not exceeding 500 words
showing the effect of the measure on existing law and the operation of the measure. If a
measure affects the organization or salaries of the office of the City Attorney, the City
Clerk shall prepare the impartial analysis. The analysis shall include a statement
indicating whether the measure was placed on the ballot by a petition signed by the
requisite number of voters or by the governing body of the city. In the event the entire
text of the proposed Ordinance is not printed on the ballot, nor in the voter information
portion of the sample ballot, there shall be printed immediately below the impartial
analysis, in no less than 10 -point type, the following: "The above statement is an impartial
analysis of Ordinance or Measure , if you desire a copy of the ordinance or measure,
please call the election official's office at 714-754-5225 and a copy will be mailed at no
cost to you. The impartial analysis for the measure shall be filed with the City Clerk by
5:00 p,m.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON November 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brenda Green, City Clerk Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
1, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the18 th day of November, 2014,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 19th day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 3 of 3
2014 California Municipal Elections Handbook
ARGUMENTS
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
Alf arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Divisior 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with
§ 9200) of the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the following form statement to be
signed by each proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
Forms
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (primary/rebuttal) argument (in favor cf/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the (title of election) election for the (jurisdiction) to be held on
2 hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their) knowledge and belief.
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name Signature
....Title- _._ _ .._ - - -
e
Editor's Notes:
All Authors must print his/her name and sign this form (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Argument itself (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Rebuttal Ar ument itself (EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Election Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shall be titled either
"Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Argument Against Measure "
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either "Rebuttal
To Argument in Favor Of Measure " or "Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure
Give this form to Council Members, Proponents, and Opponents of Measures
§ 9600, E.C.
(Revised 10/09)
Martin & Ci1ahiiien Co.
`.`�4'V`1,I�1:11'�Illi..,ll,'.I�fl l:.ln_Ciliil i 1 V;'I i. r7� 1 S'i1
Statement of Authors of Arguments
F - A - 1
ATTACHMENT 27
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR
MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California
authorizes the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for measures submitted at municipal elections;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDERAS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of
California, when the elections official has selected the arguments for and against the
measure which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the elections official shall send
a copy of an argument in favor of the proposition to the authors of any argument against
the measure and a copy of an argument against the measure to the authors of any
argument in favor of the measure immediately upon receiving the arguments.
The author or a majority of the authors of an argument relating to a city measure
may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words or may authorize
in writing any other person or persons to prepare, submit or sign the rebuttal argument.
A rebuttal argument may not be signed by more than five authors. If more than
five authors provide a signature to the rebuttal, then only the signatures of the first five
authors shall be printed to the exclusion of the excess signatures.
e re u a argumen s _sha_ be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed
name(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an
organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least
one of its principal officers, not more than 10 days after the final date for filing direct
arguments. The rebuttal arguments shall be accompanied by the Form of Statement To
Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument (Attachment 1). The rebuttal arguments shall be filed
by
Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct arguments.
Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it seeks to
rebut.
SECTION 2. That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal
arguments for city measures are repealed.
SECTION 3. That the provisions of Section 1 shall apply only to the election to be
held on November 8, 2016 and shall then be repealed.
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 1 of 2
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to submit the rebuttal
arguments, as described herein, in compliance with State law and to perform all duties
required of the elections official for the City of Costa Mesa.
Section 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON November 18, 2014.
James M. Righeimer, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA }
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas Duarte, City Attorney
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 14 -XX was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2014,
by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES.- -- ..COUNCIL -MEMBERS:.
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 19th Day of November, 2014.
BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 14 -XX Page 2 of 2
2014 California Municipal Elections Handbook
ARGUMENTS
FORM OF STATEMENT TO BE FILED BY
AUTHORS OF ARGUMENTS
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 9, Chapter 3 (beginning with
§ 9200) of the Elections Code shall be accompanied by the fallowing form statement to be
signed by each proponent, and by each author, if different, of the argument:
Forms
The undersigned proponent (s) or author(s) of the (primary/rebuttal) argument (in favor of/against) ballot
proposition (name or number) at the (title of election) election for the (jurisdiction) to be held on ,
2 hereby state that the argument is true and correct to the best of (his/her/their) knowledge and belief.
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date
Print Name Signature
Title Date..__._.. _...._.
Editor's Notes:
All Authors must print his/her name and sign this form (EC 9600)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Argument itself, (EC 9283)
AND
Print his/her name and sign the Rebuttal Argument itself (EC 9285)
Further, pursuant to Flection Code § 9282, printed arguments submitted to the voters shall be titled either
"Argument In Favor Of Measure or "Argument Against Measure
Likewise, printed rebuttal arguments submitted pursuant to Election Code § 9285 shall be titled either "Rebuttal
To Argument In Favor Of Measure _" or "Rebuttal to Argument Against Measure".
Give this form to Council Members, Proponents, and Opponents of Measures
§ 9600, E.C. Statement of Authors of Arguments
(Revised 10/09) F - A - 1
Martin & C}Iapman Co.
www.Fnartinchapman.coin (10/16120 1 3} FOURS
Cl T Y COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2014
ITEM NUMBER: OB -1
SUBJECT: SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SENIOR COMMISSION
DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2014
FROM: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION BY: TRAVIS KARLEN, RECREATION MANAGER
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
RECOMMENDATION:
TRAVIS KARLEN, RECREATION MANAGER
714-754-5052
Staff recommends that the City Council give second reading to Ordinance No. 14 -XX, to
be read by title only, and waive further reading to establish a Senior Commission that
would serve as an advisory commission to the City Council in matters related to the
operation of the Costa Mesa Senior Center.
BACKGROUND:
At the Special City Council Meeting on June 10, 2014 the City Council invoked a 90 day
termination of contract with the Costa Mesa Senior Corporation who operated the Costa
Mesa Senior Center. The corporation was governed by a Board of Directors.
On September 8, 2014 the City assumed full operation of the Costa Mesa Senior
Center. Staff was directed to establish a Senior Commission which would report to the
City Council. The Senior Center Program Administrator will act as the City Liaison to
the Commission.
ANALYSIS:
The ultimate adoption of the proposed ordinance will establish a Senior Commission that
will serve as an advisory commission to the City Council. The Commission will consider
matters referred by the City Council, hold public hearings, hold regular public meetings,
make recommendations to staff, solicit partnerships with other senior organizations and
represent the senior aged population of Costa Mesa.
The Commission will select a chair and vice chair annually at their first meeting in July of
each year. Meetings will be held every other month at Costa Mesa Senior Center on the
second Tuesday of the month. The Commission will be made up of five (5) members
appointed by the City Council and one more than half of the Commission shall constitute
a quorum. A secretary will be designated by the Recreation Manager. The secretary shall
record the minutes of the meeting and maintain records.
1
Members of the commission will be compensated through a stipend of $100 per meeting.
The annual budget for this commission would not to exceed $4,000.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
1. City Council may choose to change or add language to the proposed ordinance.
2. City Council could choose to establish an advisory committee in lieu of a
commission or not have a commission or a committee and refer all matters
through the Parks and Recreation Commission.
FISCAL REVIEW:
The cost to establish a Senior Commission for the remainder of FY 14-15 is $1,500. This
will be absorbed in the current Parks and Community Services Department budget. The
$4,000 annual cost of the commission will be included in the budget for future years.
LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the agenda report and prepared the attached
proposed Ordinance.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the establishment of a senior
commission through the adoption of the ordinance. Staff also recommends that City
Council authorize a $100.00 per meeting stipend for Commissioners.
TRAVIS M. KARLEN
Recreation Manager
STEVEN G. DUNIVENT
Interim Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 14 -XX
1
TAMARA S. LETOURNEAU
Assistant Chief Executive Officer
Cl T Y COUNCIL A GENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PH -1
SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE CITYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PROGRAM
DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2014
FROM: PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT/TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION
PRESENTATION BY: ERNESTO MUNOZ, PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RAJA SETHURAMAN, TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
MANAGER - (714) 754-5032
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution (Attachment 1) to approve the recommendations by the Traffic Impact Fee
Ad Hoc Committee and staff as follows:
1. Continue the current traffic impact fee of $181 per Average Daily Trip (ADT);
2. Continue the incentive program for new developments by assessing traffic impact fees on an
incremental basis for the first 100 trips; and
3. Approve the annual accounting of the Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Program.
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66000 et seq., and the Costa Mesa Municipal
Code, a traffic impact fee study is required by the City to establish a basis for the imposition of
Citywide traffic impact fees on new and expanding developments within the City. The purpose
of the fee is to fund the necessary transportation/circulation improvements which are related
directly to the incremental traffic impacts imposed on the City's transportation system by the
development of new and/or changing commercial, industrial, and residential uses as permitted
by the General Plan. The fee also maintains compliance with the eligibility requirements of the
Orange County Transportation Authority's (OCTA) Measure "M" Program (Measure "M").
The City Council has reviewed the Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Program each year since the fee
program was first adopted in 1993. The City Council, in July 1993, also approved the formation
of an Ad Hoc Committee consisting of representatives from various stakeholder groups to work
with staff on all aspects related to the revision and updating of traffic impact fees.
The City Council subsequently appointed an Ad Hoc Committee consisting of members
representing large and small developers, the Chamber of Commerce, citizens -at -large, as well
as members representing the City Council and the Planning Commission, to assist staff in the
development and review of the traffic impact fee.
The current Ad Hoc Committee members and their representation are as follows:
Mayor James Righeimer
Colin McCarthy
Ed Fawcett
George Sakioka
Kerry Smith
Teresa McQueen
Walter Davenport
City Council Liaison
Planning Commission Representative
Chamber of Commerce
Major Developers' Representative
Small Developers' Representative
At -Large - Representing Costa Mesa Residents
At -Large - Representing Costa Mesa Residents
In January 1999, the City Council approved a recommendation by the Traffic Impact Fee Ad
Hoc Committee to establish an incentive program for all new residential, commercial, and
industrial developments in Costa Mesa. The incentive was based upon the assessment of
traffic impact fees on an incremental basis for the first 100 trips generated by new
developments.
The last major update of the Traffic Impact Fee Study was completed in September 2005. The
update took into account the most recent land use and circulation information contained in the
2002 General Plan update and subsequent amendments. Several variations of improvement
options were considered, and it was determined that trip fees in the range of $164 per ADT
through $300 per ADT could be justified. On September 20, 2005, the City Council adopted
Resolution 05-70, approving a traffic impact fee of $181 per Average Daily Trip (ADT). The City
Council also approved the continuation of the incentive program for new developments.
The traffic impact fee calculation was re -visited again in 2011, resulting in the update of the
improvement costs using the most recent data as well as accounting for several completed
improvements (Attachment 2). The net effect of the changes yielded a revised calculation of
traffic impact fees of $184 per ADT. However, the traffic impact fee of $181 was continued by
the City Council due to low development activity as a result of ongoing economic conditions, as
well as the schedule of projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
A chronology of actions taken by the City Council on the Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Program
between the years of 1993 and 2013 is included in Attachment 3.
ANALYSIS:
The City Council, in June 2012, authorized a comprehensive review of the City's General Plan,
including the Land Use and Circulation Elements. As part of this effort, the traffic impact fee
program will undergo significant review early next year. In consideration of this, a majority of
Traffic Impact Fee Ad Hoc Committee members recommended the continuation of the current
traffic impact fee of $181 per Average Daily Trip (ADT) and the continuation of the incentive
program for the first 100 trips.
The City will initiate meetings with the Traffic Impact Fee Ad Hoc Committee early next year
following completion of the updated traffic model and a preliminary review of future
transportation conditions with updated land use information.
Incentive Program:
The incentive program for the first 100 trips of development applies to all developments
throughout the City. Several residential developments and smaller commercial developments
have benefited from this incentive program. Therefore, the Traffic Impact Fee Ad Hoc
Committee has recommended continuation of this program. The maximum amount of discount
awarded to any one project is $12,075. Based on development projects approved over the past
several years, staff has estimated that on an annual basis, this incentive has saved the development
2
community approximately $75,000. Over the past three (3) years, this amount was substantially
lower due to a significant slow -down in development activity. Staff requests City Council's approval
to continue offering this incentive program for new development.
Annual Accounting of the Traffic Impact Fee:
California Government Code Section 66001(d) requires an annual review, findings, and
accounting of the Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Program. Attachment 4 depicts the opening
balance, the ending balance on June 30, 2014, interest earned, revenues, expenditures, and
unexpended funds from the Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Account. This attachment also shows
that there are no funds unexpended or uncommitted in the account five (5) or more years after
deposit and that no administrative costs have been charged to the fee account.
As required by the Government Code, the updated Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is
contained in the Fiscal Year 2014-15 adopted budget and remains valid for the current traffic
impact fee review. The traffic impact fee account information, including the interest earned,
shown in Attachment 4, is available for public review. Staff requests City Council's approval of
the annual accounting of the Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Program.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
The City Council has the option to choose a traffic impact fee rate anywhere in the range of $164
per ADT to $300 per ADT, based on the most recent update of the traffic impact fee analysis. An
additional alternative is to not have a Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Program at all. This alternative,
however, would make the City ineligible to receive funds from any of the competitive grant
programs processed through the Orange County Transportation Authority's Combined
Transportation Funding Programs. The City Council also has the option of modifying or
suspending the incentive program for new developments.
FISCAL REVIEW:
The traffic impact fees fund only a portion of the required Citywide improvements, and alternative
funding sources such as Measure `M,' federal funds, and other City funds may be needed to fully
fund the transportation improvements as required in the City's General Plan Circulation Element.
The continuation of incentives for new development projects would result in a decrease in traffic
impact fee revenues than would otherwise be received. The total amount of incentives in any given
year would be difficult to estimate. However, based on development projects approved over the past
several years, staff has estimated that on an annual basis the total amount of incentives would be
approximately $75,000. Given that the proposed incentive program may be effective until the next
annual update, and the unlikelihood that new development projects will trigger the need for
circulation improvements based on existing traffic conditions, it is not necessary to identify an
alternate funding source at this time. The "incentive" shortfall will be added to the City -funded
portion. If the incentive program is made permanent in the future, further analysis may be necessary
to identify a funding source, other than Measure 'M' funds, to complete circulation improvements
attributed to new development projects.
LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the Resolution (Attachment 1) for
establishing the City's traffic impact fee and continuing the incentive program for all new
developments in Costa Mesa by assessment of traffic impact fees on an incremental basis.
CONCLUSION:
The Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Program estimated in 2005 was updated in 2011 based on the
most recent cost information and accounting for completed projects, as well as considering the
3
available balance in the Traffic Impact Fee Account. As the City has recently initiated a
comprehensive update of Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan, the Traffic
Impact Fee Ad Hoc Committee recommended that the current traffic impact fee of $181 per ADT
and the incentive program for new developments be continued. Staff recommends City Council's
approval of the Traffic Impact Fee Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation.
RAJA SETHURAMAN
Transportation Services Manager
ERNESTO MUNOZ
Public Services Director
STEPHEN DUNIVENT
Interim Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: 1 - Traffic Impact Fee Resolution
2- Revised Traffic Impact Fee Calculation
3- Chronology of City Council Actions
4- Traffic Impact Fee Accounting Summai
DISTRIBUTION: Chief Executive Officer
Assistant Chief Executive Officer
Development Services Director
City Clerk Division
Staff
File
M
Cl T Y COUNCIL A GENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2014 ITEM NUMBER: PH -2
SUBJECT: PLANNING APPLICATION PA -14-11 FOR A 393 -UNIT MIDRISE RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT (SYMPHONY APARTMENTS) AT 585 AND 595 ANTON BOULEVARD
AND PARK MITIGATION AGREEMENT
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION BY: MINOO ASHABI, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2014
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MINOO ASHABI, AIA (714) 754-5610
Minoo.ashabi@costamesaca.gov
RECOMMENDATIONS
The following actions are recommended:
1) Adopt resolution to approve the Addendum to the Final Program EIR No. 1052 and Final
Master Plan PA -14-11 pursuant to the Planning Commission's recommendation:
Final Master Plan PA -14-11 for development of a 393 -unit mid -rise residential
development including:
• Demolition of two restaurant buildings (17,529 square feet) and 373 surface
parking spaces;
• Construction of two midrise residential buildings consisting of 393 apartment
units connected with a pedestrian bridge, a maximum building height of 75
feet, six stories high above grade (66 feet average, 75 feet at the lobby) with
one subterranean level parking. A total of 731 parking spaces (699 standard,
15 tandem and 17 compact spaces) will be provided to accommodate the
residential units and the 4,104 square feet of retail at ground level (722 spaces
required). The project includes multiple on-site amenities such as three
outdoor decks, two pools and spas, and fitness rooms;
• Deviation from the perimeter open space setback requirement along Anton
Boulevard (20 feet required, 7 feet proposed) and Avenue of the Arts (20 feet
required, 8'6" proposed);
• Administrative Adjustment to allow encroachment of upper levels of buildings
and balconies (Level 3 and above) in the perimeter open space setback
requirement (20 feet required, 12 feet proposed); and,
• Encroachment into 25 -foot Landscape and Sidewalk Easement along Anton
Boulevard frontage (7 -foot landscaped setback proposed, 20 -foot setback
provided to building on the ground floor containing stoops and landscape
walls).
2) Adopt resolution to approve "Park Mitigation Agreement" between the applicant and City
of Costa Mesa to fund future parkland related improvements or acquisitions.
PLANNING APPLICATION SUMMARY
Location: 585 and 595 Anton Blvd.
Application
PA -14-11
Request: Development of 393 apartment units in two midrise buildings and three levels of parking on
a site previously approved with high rise towers (484 units and 6,000 SF of ancillary retail)
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Zone: PDC
General Plan: Urban Center Commercial
Lot Dimensions:
Lot Area: 4.84 -acre
Existing Development:
SURROUNDING PROPERTY:
North: The Lakes shopping center
South:
Metro Center office complex
irregular East: Commercial development
West: Commercial and office development
The site is developed with two vacant restaurant buildings and 373 parking spaces
DEVELOPMENT STANDARD COMPARISON
Development Standard
Zoning Code or NCMSP Proposed/Provided
Requirement
Density - NCMSP
100 du/acre
484 units
81 du/acre
393 units
Lot Size
One acre
4.86 -acre
Buildings
Perimeter Open Space
20' abutting Public ROW
7 feet on Anton Blvd.
8'6" on Avenue of the Arts
Open Space
42%
Ground Level: 61,436 (29%)
Amenity deck: 75,497 35%
Private Open Space
100 SF
80 -140 SF
Setbacks
Front Anton Blvd.
20 feet
7 feet 2
Side Avenue of the Arts
20 feet
8'6" 2
Interior Property Line
None
Building Height
306 feet AGL
66 feet AGL for buildings and 75
feet for entry lobby
One level subterranean parkin
Parking:
Tenant Parking
1.5 per unit - 590
710 (total residential parking)
Guest Parking
0.5 per unit for 1St 50 units
0.25 for over 50
111
710 (total residential parking)
Commercial Parking
4/1000 (retail)
5/1000 (bank)
2/1000 ancilla retail
4,037 SF retail
21 spaces
Total
722 max.
731
Patios and balconies
Same as building setbacks
Buildings and balconies encroach
8 feet into the perimeter setback 3
GP -06-02 — site specific density of 100 du/acre in Urban Center Commercial
2 Subject to approval by Planning Commission for encroachment of patios and stoops
3 Subject to approval of an Administrative Adjustment (see staff report)
CEQA Status
Addendum to Final Program EIR NO. 1052
Final Action
City Council
BACKGROUND
On October 13, 2014, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and on a 4-0 vote
(Commissioner Dickson recused himself) recommended approval of the addendum and
the final master plan for development of the 393 -unit project. This is the alternative
development option for this site. A previous entitlement was granted in 2008 for a 484 -
unit high-rise development at this site, which was also considered by the Planning
Commission at the same hearing.
Note: Because a parkland impact fee is not applied to an apartment project without a
subdivision map, the Planning Commission deferred the consideration of the Park
Mitigation Agreement to the City Council to determine an appropriate park impact fee, as
applicable, subject to the Council's discretion.
In 2006, a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) was prepared for five high rise
projects in North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. FEIR No. 1052 (SCH#2006011077) for the
North Costa Mesa High Rise Projects was certified by City Council on November 21,
2006. The approval included an overruling of Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC)
decision that the projects were inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan.
Following the certification, in January 2007, City Council approved five master plans for
high-rise development in North Costa Mesa including a master plan for development of
Symphony Towers at 585 and 595 Anton Boulevard.
Final Master Plan PA -07-18 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map VT -17207 were approved
by the Planning Commission on October 8, 2007. The entitlement included demolition of
two existing restaurants (17,529 SF) and conversion of an unbuilt 300 -room hotel
entitlement to facilitate the construction of 484 residential condominiums two towers (26 -
story and 16 -story), two six level parking structures containing 1040 parking stalls and
6,000 square feet of ancillary retail at ground floor. A two year time extension was granted
on October 13, 2014 that extended the entitlement to October 8, 2016.
A three-story off-site parking structure (531 Anton Boulevard) was also processed
subsequent to the high rise proposal to provide a portion of the parking spaces that would
be removed with development of the residential towers. Since the off-site parking
requirement is a condition of approval of PA -07-18, a two-year extension was also
granted for this entitlement on October 13, 2014.
Master Plan Requirement
The Zoning Code requires approval of a "final master plan" prior to development of a
Planned Development Zone. The primary distinction is that a "preliminary" master plan
establishes the building envelope (i.e. location, density, building height, etc.), while a
"final" master plan provides specific details regarding the site plan, floor plans, elevations,
landscaping, architecture, on-site amenities, parking supply, circulation plan, etc.
The final master plan review allows consideration of the structures' scale, site planning,
landscaping and appearance, with the goal of promoting design excellence while giving
consideration to the project's compatibility with existing uses and consistent with the North
Costa Mesa Specific Plan. The Table below compares the currently proposed project to
the previously approved entitlement.
Comparison Table of
Previously -Approved Symphony Towers and Proposed Symphony Apartments
ANAI YSIS
Final Master Plan PA -14-11
The project site at 585 and 595 Anton Boulevard is currently developed with two
restaurant buildings that have been vacant in the past few years and 373 spaces of
surface parking. The site is to the north of an office complex with three towers and four
parking structures and a 24-hour fitness center. A diagonal utility easement also runs
through the site that is currently paved and landscaped, which provides a pedestrian
access from the office complexes to Anton Boulevard.
The proposal will remove all existing structures and surface parking areas for a new
development with parking structures and a total of 393 residential units. The proposed
units are contained in two buildings over a three-level parking structure (two levels above
ground) and 28 ground floor lofts units at the perimeter of the parking structure along the
Anton Boulevard frontage and the entry plaza. A replacement parking structure (Final
Symphony Towers•
• Apartments
HighRise Buildings.R
• •
Density
100 du/acre
81 du/acre
484 units
383 units
Maximum AM Peak Hour Trip
227 trips
209 trips
Budget
Maximum PM Peak Hour Trip
290 trips
272 trips
Budget
Perimeter Open Space
Minimum 16 feet ft.
12.3 ft. (Anton Blvd. - not
including patios)
8.7 ft. (Avenue of the Arts - not
including og run
Open Space
Ground Level: 56,564 SF (27%)
Ground Level: 61,436 SF (29%)
Amenity Deck: 63,442 SF 30%
Amenity Deck: 75,497 SF 35%
Private Open Space
100 SF
80-140 SF
Front Setback (Anton Blvd.)
Minimum 16 ft.
12 ft. (upper levels and
balconies)
20 ft. ground level
Side Setback (Avenue of Arts)
18 ft.
24 ft. to bldg.
8.7 ft. do run fencing)
Parking
1,025 spaces
710 spaces
(residential)
Ratio: approx. 1.8 /unit
Ratio: approx. 1.5/ unit
plus guest parking
Plus guest parking
Retail Space
6,000 SF
4,037 SF
Parking
24 spaces
21 spaces
retail
Total
1,050 spaces
731 s aces
Building Height
172' tower one
74 ft. at lobby
272' tower two
66 ft. buildings
Stories
26 and 16 stories
6 stories
ANAI YSIS
Final Master Plan PA -14-11
The project site at 585 and 595 Anton Boulevard is currently developed with two
restaurant buildings that have been vacant in the past few years and 373 spaces of
surface parking. The site is to the north of an office complex with three towers and four
parking structures and a 24-hour fitness center. A diagonal utility easement also runs
through the site that is currently paved and landscaped, which provides a pedestrian
access from the office complexes to Anton Boulevard.
The proposal will remove all existing structures and surface parking areas for a new
development with parking structures and a total of 393 residential units. The proposed
units are contained in two buildings over a three-level parking structure (two levels above
ground) and 28 ground floor lofts units at the perimeter of the parking structure along the
Anton Boulevard frontage and the entry plaza. A replacement parking structure (Final
Master Plan PA -07-29 for Structure B) is required to be built to serve the commercial uses
at South Coast Metro Center.
Site and Building Design
Main access to the site is provided from Anton Boulevard. The main entrance provides
access for visitors of the leasing office and patrons of the retail space as well as current
residents. Residents also have a secondary access from Avenue of the Arts that leads
directly to the parking structure. The 28 lofts units are located at the Anton Boulevard
frontage to provide a pedestrian -friendly environment and engage the community as an
active area within the entry plaza. These units can be accessed from the interior of the
parking structure as well as from Anton Boulevard with raised patios and stoops. Typical
stoops are eight feet in depth and separated from the public sidewalk by a low planter
wall, landscaping and a few porch steps.
The applicant is proposing ground floor amenities in front of the retail space and opposite
of the entrance and an entry plaza with seating areas and landscaping that will be open to
the public. Other private amenities such as pools, spas, exercise room, and club house
are provided on Level 3 of the structures. These spaces are connected with a pedestrian
bridge that also provides a focal point for the project from Anton Boulevard.
The applicant is proposing two bicycle storage areas at the opposite corners of the
building on the northwest and southeast and a dog wash and dog run area along The
Avenue of the Arts frontage. The dog run is proposed to be contained by a four -foot high
fence and separated from the sidewalk with a landscape planter buffer.
All units are provided with a private balcony that range in size from 80 to 140 SF. The
balconies face either the perimeter streets or the interior courtyards and pool grounds.
Site Open Space
The project includes 61,436 square feet of open space on the ground floor (29 percent)
and 75,497 square feet of open space on the upper levels. North Costa Mesa Specific
Plan allows inclusion of open space in upper levels in the overall calculations. In
comparisons with the original approval, 16,927 square feet (2%) of additional open space
will be provided.
Floor Plans
The project in general provides 154 two bedroom units and 239 one bedroom units. The
units range in size from 750 to 1,392 square feet. The loft units are 794 square feet of
living space contained in two levels that include volume ceilings and a master bedroom
and bath on the upper level. The proposal does not contain any 3 -bedroom (or larger)
units.
Elevations
Massing of the two buildings are broken by off -sets in the elevations and incorporation of
balconies in the building design. A variety of materials is proposed such as stone veneer,
metal panels, ceramic tile cladding and a combination of metal and glass railing for the
balconies. The pedestrian bridge and the entry plaza are focal points of the project that
will be inviting to the pedestrian as well as passerby traffic.
Parking
The project is subject to the parking requirements as set forth in the North Costa Mesa
Specific Plan. Three levels of parking is provided including a subterranean level and
two levels above grade for a total of 731 spaces. Because of the parking design radius
and visibility issues, the overall number includes a small percentage of tandem and
compact spaces. However, the project in general provides 14 excess parking spaces
with use of ground floor retail.
Proposed Parking
383 -unit MidRise Development with Ancillary Retail
* Total parking includes 15 tandem parking spaces and 17 compact parking spaces.
Parking Structure B
With the development of the office complex and the restaurants a private parking
agreement allowed joint use of the 373 surface parking spaces at 585 and 595 Anton
Boulevard developed with the restaurants. The approval for the Symphony Towers
included a condition that a parking structure (Structure B) be built prior to the final
certificate of occupancy for the second tower. Following the entitlement for the towers,
on January 14, 2008 a separate planning application was approved for construction of a
three-level parking structure with 342 parking spaces at the southeast corner of the site
(531 Anton Boulevard) next to the parking structure for 555 Anton Boulevard. A two-
year time extension for this entitlements was approved under separate application.
The applicant is still under the obligation with the adjacent property owner (RREEF) to
provide the additional parking spaces. The private agreement may be revised to provide
the additional spaces atop of an existing parking structure or as originally approved.
This will be considered under a separate action by the Planning Commission.
Modification to 25 -foot Public Easement
In 1984, the City recorded a 25 -foot "Landscape and Sidewalk" easement along the
Anton Avenue right-of-way. This easement is separate from the zoning requirement for
the perimeter open space noted earlier. The applicant has requested to modify this
easement from 25 feet to 7 feet. This request is to accommodate the lofts at the
perimeter of the project with patios and stoops taking direct access from the Anton
Avenue sidewalk, in addition to the building upper levels (Level 3 and above) with units
and balconies at 12 feet to the property line.
The attached Planning Commission resolution states that the Planning Commission's
authority is limited to making a recommendation on the modification of the easement.
Any reduction to this existing landscape easement requires final action by the City
Council. A condition of approval requires that prior to obtaining a grading permit for the
project, the applicant must submit and process the easement modification/quitclaim
application through the Public Services Department.
Comparison of Landscape Easements along Anton Boulevard
Description
Proposed Project / Symphony
25 -foot easement southside of
Pending request for modification
Apartments
Anton Boulevard
to 7 -foot easement
Irvine Apartment Communities,
25 -foot easement northside of
Approved a 20 -foot easement
Enclave Apts.
Anton Boulevard
580 Anton Boulevard
25 -foot easement northside of
Approved a 20 -foot easement
250 -unit midrise
Anton Boulevard
Perimeter Open Space
The Planned Development Commercial (PDC) and North Costa Mesa Specific Plan
establishes the development standards for this project. The project site is subject to a 20 -
foot minimum perimeter open space setback on Avenue of the Arts and Anton Boulevard
frontage. No setback is required from the interior driveways.
Anton Boulevard Perimeter Open Space
• Building setbacks — The upper levels (level 3 and above) of the buildings will
include units and balconies encroaching a maximum of eight feet into this setback.
No encroachment is proposed on the ground level. The minimum setback from the
edge of the upper building and balconies will be at 12 feet to the property line
along this frontage.
• Patios and Stoops — The proposed site design provide a minimum 7 -foot setback
from the public sidewalk on Anton Boulevard to the face of the landscape wall
leading to the raised patios.
Avenue of the Arts Perimeter Open Space
• The proposed perimeter setback along Avenue of the Arts is more than 24 feet;
however, the proposed dog run encroaches 15 feet into this setback with a metal
barrier. With the proposed configuration an eight -foot planter separates the dog
park from the sidewalk that will provide for landscape screening and enhancement
of that frontage.
Administrative Adjustment/ Deviation from Perimeter Open Space Requirement
In accordance with Section 13-61 of the Zoning Code, the Planning Commission could
approve inclusion of architectural features (such as arcades, awnings and canopies) and
hardscape features (such as paving, patios, planters and street furniture) if the Planning
Commission determines that:
(1) These other features provide usable, visually interesting pedestrian amenities and
facilitate pedestrian circulation.
(2) These additional features enhance the overall urban design concept of the
Planned Development and promote the goals of the General Plan, applicable
specific plan.
(3) Adequate landscaping is retained to shade the outdoor use areas and to
complement the architecture and the design of buildings and pedestrian areas;
and
(4) The design of the perimeter setback area will be compatible with contiguous
development.
The requested encroachment into perimeter setback on the ground level is to allow
raised patios, steps and low walls along the street frontage on Anton Boulevard that
could provide a better pedestrian experience. The addition of the secondary access to
the perimeter loft units from the public sidewalk in this urban setting is considered an
amenity of the project by creating pedestrian linkages to a central open space. This
landscaped courtyard will be open to the public. The 15 -foot encroachment on Avenue
of the Arts is to allow a confined dog park. The dog park is an amenity to the
development and must be provided on the ground level for maintenance purposes. The
applicant chose this frontage for easy pedestrian access and limited visibility to
passerbys.
Building projections are also allowed in the Perimeter Open Space per Section 13-61 if
the following is determined that:
(1) An adequate, well-defined pedestrian circulation system is provided within the
planned development;
(2) Pedestrian oriented landscaped and/or public use areas (plazas, patios, etc.) are
provided within the planned development;
(3) The reduced open space area will not be detrimental to developments on
contiguous properties;
(4) The reduced building setback will not deprive the street nor other properties of
necessary light and air; and
(5) These additional features enhance the overall urban design concept of the
Planned Development and promote the goals of the City's General Plan,
applicable specific plan.
The perimeter open space was established with the office park setting of the North
Costa Mesa Specific Plan. The NCMSP refers to the area on Anton Boulevard between
Bristol Street and Sakioka Drive as pedestrian zone, and the proposal is consistent with
the promotion of pedestrian linkages
The North Costa Mesa Specific Plan (NCMSP) allows a site specific density of 100
dwelling per acre for this 4.86 acre site or a maximum of 484 units. The proposed
development is 91 units fewer than the allowable densities approved by the General Plan
and the zoning for the site. The encroachment is not increasing the density or extend the
building development area on the ground floor. A corner encroachment of building was
approved for the mid -rise development at 580 Anton Boulevard and the previous approval
of the Symphony Towers allowed an encroachment that reduced the perimeter open
space to 16 feet.
The reduced perimeter setback is appropriate for the urban setting of the project and
allows the public sidewalk connection to the center plaza and the perimeter lofts. The
proposed development will enhance the pedestrian sidewalk, specifically in this stretch
and improve the street frontage by lofts units taking direct access from the sidewalk. The
reduced building setback is applicable only to the upper levels of the buildings, where
there will be more than 16 feet of height clearance from the sidewalk level. The balconies
fill in the space between the building pop -outs and provide visual relief from the massing
of the building.
Shade/Shadow Analysis
The Program EIR concluded that the proposed high-rise residential units are not
sensitive uses with the same expectations of shade/shadow limits as traditional multi-
family residential uses. The City considers the project area as an urban environment
with intensely developed commercial, residential, and cultural uses in a limited
geographic area. Given the urban context of the project area, the surrounding land
uses, including the existing commercial and retail uses located on the southwest corner
of Anton Avenue and Avenue of the Arts were not considered sensitive uses; therefore,
the Program EIR concluded that no impact would occur.
The proposed project includes a building height reduction from 306 to 66 feet with a
roof segment that extends 74'10" over the lobby, the elevator, and stairway areas in
Building A and Building B and, therefore, will produce a significantly reduced or a more
shallow shadow than the originally proposed project. As shown below shadows from the
proposed project will not reach the surrounding building. Therefore, the Program EIR
remains adequate and complete for this topic.
4L
SU"1. Wra 000
fpgRSOI= I""
Wo
Park Mitigation Agreement
"111 WSPKI. 1mr"
The mitigation monitoring program provides the standard conditions of approval and
mitigation measures for the project. The applicant is requesting City Council approval of a
Park Mitigation Agreement to comply with the mitigation measures and standard
conditions adopted with EIR No. 1052 and included in the addendum prepared for the
subsequent project.
The Park Mitigation Agreement is a required mitigation measure to offset parkland
impacts from the proposed project. The EIR for North Costa Mesa High Rise projects
identifies the park impacts of these projects and notes that the impact will be mitigated
with submission of the park impact fees. At the time, all projects under the EIR were for
sale condominium units subject to a park impact fee.
As an apartment, the 393 -unit project would not require a subdivision map and would not
be subject to park impact fees. In comparison, the original 484 -unit Symphony Towers
project included a vesting tentative tract map and was subject to park impact fees, which
were $10,826.00 per unit at the time. The Current park fee is $13,829 per unit. However,
in cases where vesting tentative tract maps were filed, the park fee applicable at the time
of submittal was applicable to the project.
Although the proposed Symphony Apartments is not currently subject to park impact fees
as a rental project, the City is in the process of preparing a park impact fee that would
determine the impacts fees for apartment communities as well as reassessing the
subdivision fees. Since the park impact fee has not been established, projects that are
approved prior to fee adoption would be subject to a condition of approval specifying that
the fees in effect at the time of permit issuance would be applicable to the project.
The Addendum to the EIR indicates that the addition of 393 apartment units will place
increased burden on the City's park and open space use. However, the applicant is
requesting that a fixed fee amount be identified and is therefore requesting approval of a
Park Mitigation Agreement to establish a park impact fee that would be approved at the
time of project approval.
The project provides over six million dollars of on-site amenities. These improvements
include private amenities as well as an open space plaza at the ground level available for
public use that could be credited toward the park impact fees (Attachment 8). The draft
Development Agreement is attached for consideration of the City Council for mitigation of
projects' impacts on City parks. The fee amount and terms of the proposed Development
Agreement is subject to approval by the City Council. If the project is converted to
condominiums in the future, the project would still be subject to the payment of Quimby
Act fee effective at the time. Condition No. 31 is included to address this issue.
Recommended Park Fee
The most recent Development Agreement related to park impact fee was approved by
City Council on April 15, 2014 for the 240 -unit apartment project at 125 Baker Street. At
the time, the City had not initiated the park fee study.. The City Council entered into an
agreement with the applicant that required submittal of an infrastructure fee in the
amount of $250,000.00.
The developer of Symphony Apartment is providing more than six millions dollars of on-
site amenities that will alleviate most of the demand for park use from the project.
Considering the on-site amenities and using the 125 E. Baker project as a basis for
calculating the park impact fee, staff is recommending the following to be considered by
the City Council:
Base amount — using the 125 E. Baker Street example at a rate of $1,042.00 per
unit, the minimum park fee impact to be considered is $409,375.00. It should be
noted that this project was submitted at a time when park impacts for apartment
complexes was not being studied and the applicant and City Council agreed on an
average fee amount to off -set the improvement cost to the City.
Credit for on-site Amenities - The fee amount may take into consideration private
on-site amenities that include open space and park like setting, as well as
amenities that will be provided on street level that could be available to the visitors
and residents.
Considering the noted issues, Council may consider a fee per unit in the range of
$1,042.00 (reference: 125 E. Baker Street project) per unit to $3,500 (25% of the current
park impact fee) per unit; however, the Council may discuss alternatives and has the
ability to raise or lower that amount as they feel appropriate.
The following comparison shows the project under park fees in effect in 2014 and the
park fee related to development of Symphony Towers and the Vesting Tentative Tract
Map approved in 2007 for this site.
EXISTING FEE
THEORETICAL SCENARIOS ONLY
FOR 393 -UNIT PROJECT
DEVELOPER'S ESTIMATION OF
COST OF ON-SITE AMENITIES
2014 Current Park Fee for
2007 Park Fee of
2014 Park Fee of
2014 Estimate
Rental Projects
$10,829 per unit
$13,829 per unit
$0.00 (no fee for
$4,255,797
$5,434,798
$6.6 million
residential projects
without a subdivision
CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN, NCSMP AND ZONING CODE
General Plan Amendment GP -06-02 and Zoning Code Amendment CO -06-05 allowed
high-rise residential development in the Planned Development Commercial (PDC) of the
North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. The proposed project conforms to the General Plan and
Zoning Code as amended. The proposal would also adhere to the exterior and interior
noise standards established for mixed-use developments in the Planned Development
zone.
The proposed development is 91 units below the approved density of 100 du/acre as
approved by General Plan Amendment GP -06-02 for the 4.86 -acre site. In addition, the
proposal complies with the specific General Plan objectives as follows:
• Land Use Objective LU -1F.4: Ensure that residential densities can be supported
by the infrastructure and that high density residential areas are not permitted in
areas, which cause incompatibility with existing single-family areas.
• Land Use Objective LU1 C.3: Prohibit construction of buildings which would present
a hazard to air navigation as determined by the FAA.
• Land Use Objective LUA.1: Provide for the development of a mix and balance of
housing opportunities, commercial goods and services, and employment
opportunities in consideration of the needs of the business and residential
segment of the community.
The project would replace two vacant restaurant buildings with a modern and quality
project that would enhance the appearance and value of the site and its surroundings.
The project provides new housing opportunities at a level no greater than can be
supported by the existing infrastructure. In addition, the proposal will provide on-site
parking spaces that exceeds current parking standards.
Conditions of Approval/ Mitigation Measures
The mitigation monitoring program provides the standard conditions of approval and
mitigation measures (Exhibit B).
Airport Land Use Commission and FAA No Hazard Determination
Kari Rigoni, Executive Director of the Airport Land Use Commission, has indicated that
the proposed mid -rise building is not subject to the ALUC's review. The ALUC's
consistency determination on the high-rise development proposal was overruled by City
Council in 2007; no additional review if required for the mid -rise project at 66 feet in
average height (75 feet maximum at the lobby).
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a Determination of No Hazard in 2006
for the original Symphony Towers project. The FAA No Hazard Determination
established a maximum building height envelope. The proposed buildings at a maximum
of 75 feet in height are well below the FAA requirement. A condition of approval requires
that a valid FAA No Hazard Determination be submitted prior to issuance of building
permits.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Final Program EIR No. 1052 was prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Costa
Mesa Environmental Guidelines. Council certified the Program EIR on November 21,
2006 by adoption of Resolution No. 06-93. Since the project's revision is within the scope
of the projects reviewed by EIR No. 1052 and new environmental impacts are not
identified with the project, an Addendum to the EIR (Attachment 10) was prepared by
CAA Planning in September 2014. On October 13, 2014, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the addendum.
LEGAL REVIEW
The draft resolutions have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney's
Office.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
During the public review process, one letter was submitted (Attachment 8) regarding the
construction traffic that was reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to October 13,
2014 meeting. A condition of approval requires submittal of a construction management
plan prior to demolition and grading activities. Concerns raised by the letter will be
considered during the review of the construction management plan.
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council has the following options:
• Adopt the following resolutions:
(a) Pursuant to the Planning Commission recommendation, approve the
addendum to EIR No. 1052 and Final Master Plan for 393 -unit apartments
with any modifications.
(b) Approve Park Mitigation Fee Agreement.
• Deny the project. If the project were denied, the applicant could not submit
substantially the same type of application for six months.
CONCLUSION
The proposed development provides an alternative site design with mid -rise residential
buildings and a reduction in overall density. The project will provide a high quality
residential development within an office complex and walking distance to retail and job
opportunities. The proposal of the open paseo at the center of the site and pedestrian
connection from the sidewalk to the units and ground level retail and open space is
consistent with the visions of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and General Plan
policies in providing quality development in an urban setting and contributing to a
pedestrian zone on Anton Boulevard.
MINOO ASHABI, AIA
Principal Planner
GARY ARMSTRONG, AICP
Director of Economic & Development /
Deputy CEO
Attachments: 1. Location Map
2. Draft Resolutions
3. Planning Commission Minute Excerpts
4. Planning Commission Staff Report (no attachments)
5. Planning Commission Resolution
6. List of open space and amenities (provided by applicant)
7. Submitted Correspondence
8. Submitted Plans (under separate cover)
9. Addendum to EIR No. 1052 (under separate cover)
cc: Chief Executive Officer
Assistant Chief Executive Officer
Director of Economic & Development / Deputy CEO
City Attorney
Public Services Director
Transportation Svs. Mgr.
City Engineer
City Clerk (9)
Staff (7)
File (2)
Alan Hyden
Wilson Meany
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3330
San Francisco, CA 94111
George Sakioka
14850 Sunflower Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92707
Winston Stromberg
Latham and Watkins
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
ADDENDUM TO NORTH COSTA MESA HIGH RISE
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EIR NO. 1052 AND FINAL
MASTER PLAN PA -14-11 FOR 393 -UNIT SYMPHONY
APARTMENTS AT 585 AND 595 ANTON BOULEVARD
IN A PDC ZONE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Symphony Apartments project ("Project") is a six -story, 393 -unit
apartment complex (66 feet maximum height) at a density of 81 dwelling units per acre
with 731 parking spaces within a parking structure, along with the following:
1. Addendum to Final Program EIR. Final Program Environmental Impact
Report No. 1052 was prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of
Costa Mesa Environmental Guidelines. Council certified the Program EIR on
November 21, 2006 by adoption of Resolution No. 06-93. Since the project's
revision is within the scope of the projects reviewed by EIR No. 1052 and new
environmental impacts are not identified with the project, an Addendum to the
EIR was prepared by CAA Planning in September 2014.
2. Final Master Plan PA -14-11: an application for: (a) demolition of two
restaurant buildings (17,529 square feet) and 373 surface parking spaces; (b)
construction of two midrise residential buildings connected with a pedestrian
bridge consisting of 393 apartment units, six stories high above grade (66 feet
average, 75 feet maximum at the lobby) with one subterranean parking
structure that will provide a total of 731 parking spaces (699 standard, 15
tandem and 17 compact spaces) to accommodate the residential units and
4,104 square feet of retail (722 spaces required) and multiple on-site
amenities such as three outdoor decks, two pools and spas, and fitness
rooms; (c) deviation from the perimeter open space requirement along Anton
Boulevard (20 feet required, 7 feet proposed) and Avenue of the Arts (20 feet
required, 8'6" proposed); (d) Administrative Adjustment to allow encroachment
of upper levels of buildings and balconies (Level 3 and above) in the perimeter
open space (20 feet required, 12 feet proposed); (e) vacation of a portion of
25 -foot Landscape and Sidewalk Easement ("Easement") along Anton
Boulevard frontage (7 feet landscaped setback proposed, 20 feet setback
provided to building on the ground floor containing stoops and landscape
walls); and, (f) a three-year entitlement for PA -14-11.
WHEREAS, Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13.29(q) provides that "Unless
otherwise stated in the Zoning Code, applications for proposed projects which require two
or more planning application approvals, may be processed concurrent. Final project
approval shall not be granted until all necessary approvals have been obtained";
WHEREAS, the request for the vacation of a portion of the Landscape and
Sidewalk Easement (from 25 feet to 7 feet) and approval of the Final Master Plan are
inexorably linked in that the vacation of the Easement will determine building setbacks
and location of stoops, landscape walls, steps and ground floor patios. City Council shall
serve as the final review authority on the vacation of the Easement;
WHEREAS, the City Council may consider and approve a Park Mitigation
Agreement by separate Council resolution to mitigate parkland impacts from the
proposed project;
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment GP -06-02 and Zoning Code Amendment
CO -06-05 were required to allow high-rise residential development in the Planned
Development Commercial (PDC) zoning district and to specify exterior noise standards
for certain outdoor common recreational amenity areas of a high-rise residential
development. The proposed project conforms to the General Plan and Zoning Code,
as amended in January 2007;
WHEREAS, the Final Master Plan establishes a mid -rise residential
development option that complies with the total number of residential units and non-
residential building square footage identified for this sub -area in Area 6 of the North
Costa Mesa Specific Plan, as amended per SP -06-02;
WHEREAS, the Addendum to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report
("EIR") No. 1052 was prepared by CAA Planning in September 2014 and provided as
an attachment to the Planning Commission staff report dated October 13, 2014;
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
on October 13, 2014 to allow for public comment on the proposed project and the
Addendum to the Final Program EIR and with all persons having been given the
opportunity to be heard both for and against the proposed project;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
Addendum to Final Program EIR and Final Master Plan PA -14-11 on October 13, 2014;
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on
November 18, 2014 to allow for public comment on the proposed project and the
Addendum to the Final Program EIR and with all persons having been given the
opportunity to be heard both for and against the proposed project;
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all environmental documents
comprising the Final Program EIR and has found that the Addendum to the EIR considers
all environmental impacts of the proposed project and a reasonable range of alternatives,
and the Addendum to the EIR is complete, adequate and fully compliant with all
requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Costa Mesa Environmental
Guidelines;
WHEREAS, the Addendum to the Final Program EIR No. 1052 constitutes project -
specific environmental analysis for the revised midrise residential project at 585-595
Anton Boulevard, and no additional environmental review is required prior to construction
of the proposed project;
WHEREAS, as condition of approval for the Project, the applicant is required to
obtain, prior to the issuance of building permits, a current and valid Determination of No
Hazard from the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). The previous Determination of
No Hazard was issued on October 17, 2006, which established a maximum building
height of 306 feet above mean sea level for the proposed high-rise residential towers at
585 and 595 Anton Boulevard.
WHEREAS, the California Government Code 65402, requires the City of Costa
Mesa shall not acquire, use, or dispose of any real property until the use of the property
has been found in conformance with the City's General Plan;
WHEREAS, the proposed vacation of easement along Anton Boulevard has
been reviewed by the Engineering and Transportation Services Divisions, and based on
the existing land use and circulation configuration, Given that this portion of the
easement serves no public street and/or highway purposes, the proposed action will not
impact the City's transportation system plan.
WHEREAS, the subject modification to the easement adjacent to properties at
585 and 595 Anton Boulevard is shown in Exhibit D;
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed vacation of a
portion of the Landscape and Sidewalk Easement from 25 feet to 7 feet is in
conformance with the General Plan.
WHEREAS, the reduced easement meets the intent of the 1984 Open Space
Easement by retaining areas for passive recreation purposes that will be improved with
landscape and hardscape features preserving the open space character and adding to
amenities of living in neighboring urbanized areas.
WHEREAS, a parkland impact fee shall be assessed per unit pursuant to a Park
Mitigation Agreement between the property owner and the City of Costa Mesa.
Parkland impacts from the proposed new residents of the Symphony Midrise Apartment
project shall be reduced to below a level of significance based on the joint consideration
of the level of on-site amenities and the parkland impact fee in the Park Mitigation
Agreement. Specifically, the combination of these shall mitigate the park impacts of the
proposed project. Quimby Fees shall no longer apply to the project unless the project is
developed as condominium units.
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find the proposed vacation
of excess right-of-way in conformance to the City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record and the
findings contained in Exhibit A, and subject to the conditions of approval contained in
Exhibit B and mitigation measures contained in Exhibit C, the City Council hereby
APPROVES the Addendum to Final Program EIR No. 1052 and Final Master Plan PA -
14 -11.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Costa Mesa City Council does hereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon the activity
as described in the staff report for Planning Application PA -14-11 and upon the
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions / mitigation measures in
Exhibits "B" and "C" and compliance of all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Any
approval granted by this resolution shall be subject to review, modification or revocation
if there is a material change that occurs in the operation, or if the applicant fails to
comply with any of the conditions of approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if any section, division, sentence, clause,
phrase or portion of this resolution, or the documents in the record in support of this
resolution, are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining provisions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 18th day of November, 2014.
ATTEST:
JIM RIGHEIMER
Mayor, City of Costa Mesa
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF COSTA MESA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Council Resolution Number 14_
as considered at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 18th day of
November, 2014, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting
of said City Council held on the 18th day of November, 2014, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the
City of Costa Mesa this day of , 2014
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A
"PARK MITIGATION AGREEMENT" FOR FINAL
MASTER PLAN PA -14-11 FOR THE 393 -UNIT
SYMPHONY APARTMENTS AT 585 AND 595 ANTON
BOULEVARD IN A PDC ZONE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Symphony Apartments project ("Project") is a six -story, 393 -unit
apartment complex (66 feet maximum height) at a density of 81 dwelling units per acre
with 731 parking spaces within a parking structure, along with the following:
1. Addendum to Final Program EIR. Final Program Environmental Impact
Report No. 1052 was prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of
Costa Mesa Environmental Guidelines. Council certified the Program EIR on
November 21, 2006 by adoption of Resolution No. 06-93. Since the project's
revision is within the scope of the projects reviewed by EIR No. 1052 and new
environmental impacts are not identified with the project, an Addendum to the
EIR was prepared by CAA Planning in September 2014.
2. Final Master Plan PA -14-11: an application for: (a) demolition of two
restaurant buildings (17,529 square feet) and 373 surface parking spaces; (b)
construction of two midrise residential buildings connected with a pedestrian
bridge consisting of 393 apartment units, six stories high above grade (66 feet
average, 75 feet maximum at the lobby) with one subterranean parking
structure that will provide a total of 731 parking spaces (699 standard, 15
tandem and 17 compact spaces) to accommodate the residential units and
4,104 square feet of retail (722 spaces required) and multiple on-site amenities
such as three outdoor decks, two pools and spas, and fitness rooms; (c)
deviation from the perimeter open space requirement along Anton Boulevard
(20 feet required, 7 feet proposed) and Avenue of the Arts (20 feet required,
8'6" proposed); (d) Administrative Adjustment to allow encroachment of upper
levels of buildings and balconies (Level 3 and above) in the perimeter open
space (20 feet required, 12 feet proposed); (e) vacation of a portion of 25 -foot
Landscape and Sidewalk Easement ("Easement") along Anton Boulevard
frontage (7 feet landscaped setback proposed, 20 feet setback provided to
building on the ground floor containing stoops and landscape walls); and, (f) a
three-year entitlement for PA -14-11.
WHEREAS, Parking Structure B is a three-level parking structure (total 342
spaces) at South Coast Metro Center, located at 531 Anton Boulevard including a
deviation from shared parking requirements and maximum number of compact parking
stalls.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Addendum to the EIR and Final Master
Plan PA -14-11 by adoption of Council resolution No. 14- ;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved Parking Structure B by adoption
of Planning Commission Resolution No. 08-03;
WHEREAS, the City Council may consider and approve a Park Mitigation
Agreement by separate Council resolution to mitigate parkland impacts from the
proposed project;
WHEREAS, the Final Master Plan establishes a mid -rise residential
development option that complies with the total number of residential units and non-
residential building square footage identified for this sub -area in Area 6 of the North
Costa Mesa Specific Plan, as amended per SP -06-02;
WHEREAS, the Addendum to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report
("EIR") No. 1052 was prepared by CAA Planning in September 2014 and provided as
an attachment to the Planning Commission staff report dated October 13, 2014;
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
on October 13, 2014 to allow for public comment on the proposed project and the
Addendum to the Final Program EIR and with all persons having been given the
opportunity to be heard both for and against the proposed project;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Addendum
to Final Program EIR and Final Master Plan PA -14-11 on October 13, 2014;
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on
November 18, 2014 to allow for public comment on the proposed project and the
Addendum to the Final Program EIR and with all persons having been given the
opportunity to be heard both for and against the proposed project;
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all environmental documents
comprising the Final Program EIR and has found that the Addendum to the EIR considers
all environmental impacts of the proposed project and a reasonable range of alternatives,
and the Addendum to the EIR is complete, adequate and fully compliant with all
requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Costa Mesa Environmental
Guidelines;
WHEREAS, the Addendum to the Final Program EIR No. 1052 constitutes project -
specific environmental analysis for the revised midrise residential project at 585-595
Anton Boulevard, and no additional environmental review is required prior to construction
of the proposed project. Payment of a parkland impact fee pursuant to an executed
agreement is a mitigation measure described in the Addendum to the EIR;
WHEREAS, a parkland impact fee shall be assessed per unit pursuant to a Park
Mitigation Agreement between the property owner and the City of Costa Mesa.
Parkland impacts from the proposed new residents of the Symphony Midrise Apartment
project shall be reduced to below a level of significance based on the joint consideration
of the level of on-site amenities and the parkland impact fee in the Park Mitigation
Agreement. Specifically, the combination of these shall mitigate the park impacts of the
proposed project. Quimby Fees shall no longer apply to the project unless the project is
developed as condominium units.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record, the City
Council hereby APPROVES the Park Mitigation Agreement to be valid for a five year
period from November 18, 2014 to November 18, 2019. The Park Mitigation Agreement
is attached as Exhibit A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Park Mitigation Agreement also specifies
that the entitlement approval for Final Master Plan PA -14-11 (Symphony Apartments)
and Final Master Plan PA -07-29 (Parking Structure B) shall coincide with the five year
timeframe of the Park Mitigation Agreement;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Costa Mesa City Council does hereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon the activity
as described in the staff report for Planning Application PA -14-11 and upon the
applicant's compliance with each and all applicable the conditions / mitigation measures
contained in Council Resolution No. 14- , and compliance of all applicable
federal, state, and local laws. Any approval granted by this resolution shall be subject
to review, modification or revocation if there is a material change that occurs in the
operation, or if the applicant fails to comply with any of the conditions of approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if any section, division, sentence, clause,
phrase or portion of this resolution, or the documents in the record in support of this
resolution, are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining provisions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 18th day of November, 2014.
JIM RIGHEIMER
Mayor, City of Costa Mesa
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF COSTA MESA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the above Council Resolution Number 14_
as considered at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 18th day of
November, 2014, and thereafter passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting
of said City Council held on the 18th day of November, 2014, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the
City of Costa Mesa this day of , 2014
EXHIBIT "A"
FINDINGS
A. The proposed project complies with Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-29
(g) (5) because:
Finding: The master plan meets the broader goals of the General Plan, any
applicable specific plan, and the Zoning Code by exhibiting excellence in design,
site planning, and integration of uses and structures and protection of the
neighboring development.
Facts in Support of Finding: Final Master Plan PA -14-11 meets the
broader goals of the 2000 General Plan, as amended, North Costa Mesa
Specific Plan, as amended, in that the proposed project would create a
unique housing type within an urban area in South Coast Metro Center in
Costa Mesa. The new buildings will feature world-class architecture and
the residential structures will complement the cultural and entertainment
arts center uses at South Coast Plaza Town Center. The proposed project
would meet the housing needs of the professionals and high-income
segments of the community at a level no greater than which can be
supported by planned infrastructure improvements.
The proposed master plan and related improvements is consistent with
the General Plan, as amended per GP -06-02, North Costa Mesa Specific
Plan, as previously amended per SP -06-02, and Zoning Code, as
previously amended per CO -06-05.
B. Approval of the administrative adjustment for encroachment into perimeter
landscaping, complies with Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-29(g)(1) as
follows:
Finding: Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, the strict
application of development standards deprives such property of privileges
enjoyed by others in the vicinity under identical zoning classifications.
Facts in Support of Finding: This encroachment is applicable to the
upper levels (Level 3 and above) of the buildings; the ground floor of the
building is not encroaching into the perimeter setback. The upper level
pop -outs and balconies encroach a maximum of eight feet into the 20 -foot
setback; however, since the height clearance will be more than 16 feet,
the encroachment is not affecting the ground level openness at the
perimeter. A similar encroachment was approved for the mid -rise
development at 580 Anton Boulevard, the 421 Bernard Street in PDC
zone and the Symphony Towers entitlement for the 484 -unit high-rise
development.
Required Finding: The deviations granted shall be subject to such conditions as
will assure that the deviation authorized shall not constitute a grant of special
privileges inconsistent with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and
zone in which the property is situated.
Facts in Support of Finding: The reduced perimeter setback is
applicable to the upper levels that will provide a minimum of 16 -foot height
clearance within the perimeter open space. In addition, the most
encroachment (8 feet) is related to the balconies that are not continuous
and extend out uniformly at each unit but separated by at least 30 feet.
The proposed encroachment is intended to allow for larger open space
areas on the upper levels and provide each unit with a private balcony
which will be beneficial to the residents. In addition, given the height of the
structures, the intent of the openness at the perimeter of the site will be
met.
Required Finding: The granting of the deviations will not allow a use, density, or
intensity which is not in accordance with the general plan designation and any
applicable specific plan for the property.
Facts in Support of Finding: The encroachment of the upper levels into
the perimeter setback will allow larger upper -deck open space and private
balconies and is not affecting the ground floor building setback or the
overall intensity of the development. The proposed development is
consistent with the General Plan Amendment GP -06-02 and North Costa
Mesa Specific Plan, as amended per SP -06-02 with 91 fewer units that
the 2007 approved high-rise master plan for development of 484 units.
C. The proposed project complies with Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-61
(a) with respect to encroachment into the perimeter open space because:
Finding: The proposed features provide usable, visually interesting amenities
and facilitate pedestrian circulation.
Facts in Support of Finding: Deviation from the perimeter open space to
allow encroachment of the patios and stoops into the perimeter open
setback at Anton Boulevard (20 -feet required, 7 feet proposed) and the
dog park fencing along Avenue of the Arts (20 -feet required, 8'6"
proposed) will provide usable amenities and facilitate pedestrian
circulation on Anton Boulevard. The encroachment allows a pedestrian
friendly sidewalk with landscape and hardscape improvements that will
enhance the streetscape and engage the sidewalk connecting to other
office and commercial uses on Anton Boulevard. The encroachment on
Avenue of the Arts is related to a dog run along the side of the building.
The buildings are oriented on Anton Boulevard where the main lobby is
provided and a retail space and ground floor open space will be located.
The reduced landscaping will be complemented with decorative
hardscape and urban design features such as stoops and raised patios
that will be a good fit for the Anton Boulevard frontage and improving the
pedestrian linkages in the area.
Required Finding: The additional features enhance the overall urban design
concept of the Planned Development and promote the goals of General Plan,
applicable specific plan, and /or Redevelopment Plan.
Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed landscape and patio
improvements and enhanced public sidewalk will provide a pedestrian
friendly edge along the project and Anton Boulevard. This pedestrian
walkways also connects to an open space that is accessible and visible
from the street and available for public use. The project also includes
significant improvements to the public right-of-way in terms of trees and
landscaping. Encroachments into perimeter setback requirements have
been approved in a similar manner for 1901 Newport Boulevard in the
PDC zone and 580 Anton Boulevard in PDR zone.
Required Finding: Adequate landscaping is retained to shade the outdoor use
areas and to complement the architecture and the design of buildings and
pedestrian areas.
Facts in Support of Finding: The reduced open space allows a sidewalk
and parkway that connect to adjacent raised patios and steps leading to
loft units fronting on Anton Boulevard. These units take direct access from
the street which is a positive aspect for safety and engaging the street and
public sidewalk from a passive area to an active public space. The
sidewalk also widens and connects to the centralized ground floor open
space that is proposed in front of the retail space. This area includes a
variety of landscape, hardscape and seating areas that could be used by
the patrons and pedestrians that would walk to the office towers to the
rear. The reduced setback along Anton Boulevard is facing north which
will be mostly shaded because of the site orientation.
Required Finding: The design of the perimeter setback area will be compatible
with contiguous development.
Facts in Support of Finding: The building site has more than 800 feet of
frontage on Anton Boulevard that covers the entire block from Avenue of
the Arts to Sakioka Drive. The proposed sidewalk and landscape
improvements will not directly connect to the sidewalk on the adjacent
properties on east or west.
D. The proposed project complies with Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-61
(b) with respect to building encroachment into the perimeter open space
because:
Required Finding: An adequate, well defined pedestrian circulation system is
provided within the planned development.
Facts in Support of Finding: The requested encroachment into
perimeter setback on the ground level is to allow raised patios, steps and
low walls along the street frontage on Anton Boulevard that could provide
a better pedestrian experience.
Required Finding: Pedestrian oriented landscape and/or public use areas
(plazas, patios, etc.) are provided within the planned development.
Facts in Support of Finding: The reduced perimeter setback is
appropriate for the urban setting of the project and allows the public
sidewalk connection to the center plaza and the perimeter lofts. The
proposed development will enhance the pedestrian sidewalk, specifically in
this stretch and improve the street frontage by lofts units taking direct
access from the sidewalk.
Required Finding: The reduced open space area will not be detrimental to
development on contiguous properties.
Facts in Support of Finding: The reduced building setback is applicable
only to the upper levels of the buildings, where there will be more than 16
feet of height clearance from the sidewalk level. The proposed buildings
contain the entire block between Sakioka Drive and Avenue of the Arts and
are not in immediate proximity to any other property.
Required Finding: The reduced building setback will not deprive the street nor
other properties of necessary light and air.
Facts in Support of Finding: The reduced building setback is applicable
only to the upper levels of the buildings, where there will be more than 16
feet of height clearance from the sidewalk level. The balconies fill in the
space between the building pop -outs and provide visual relief from the
massing of the building.
Required Finding: These additional features enhance the overall urban design
concept of the Planned Development and promote the goals of City's General
Plan and North Costa Mesa Specific Plan.
Facts in Support of Finding: This encroachment is applicable to the
upper levels (Level 3 and above) of the buildings; the ground floor of the
building is not encroaching into the perimeter setback. The development
with the stoops and patios and upper level balconies will enhance the
urban design on Anton Boulevard. In addition, the design concept
contributes to the pedestrian area, which the NCMSP refers as pedestrian
zone.
E. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan/Zoning Code with
regard to use, density and intensity.
F. The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental
procedures. Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) #1052 was
prepared for the final master plan, pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act. Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, mitigation measures have been included as conditions of approval
that reduce impacts to the fullest extent reasonable and practicable.
G. The project is subject to all Mitigation Measures from Final Program EIR #1052
have been included as conditions of approval and terms and conditions of the
Park Mitigation Agreement to mitigate park impacts. If any of these conditions
are removed, the City Council must make a finding that the project will not result
in significant environmental impacts, that the condition(s) are within the
responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency, or that specific economic,
social, or other considerations make the mitigation measures infeasible.
H. The findings with respect to the environmental effects of the project are in the
document, "CEQA Statements of Findings, Facts and Overriding Consideration
for the North Costa Mesa High Rise Residential Projects", attached to the City
Council resolution for the General Plan Amendment GP -06-02.
The evidence presented in the record as a whole indicates that the project will
not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources or
habitat. The project site consists of ornamental, non-native vegetation and does
not contain, nor is it in proximity to, any sensitive habitat areas.
J. The project, as conditioned, is consistent with Chapter XII, Article 3,
Transportation System Management of Title 13 of the Municipal Code in that the
development projects' traffic impacts will be mitigated at all affected
intersections.
K. The proposed midrise building as conditioned shall include the City of Costa
Mesa's building and fire safety standards for this type of residential development.
L. The project shall be constructed in accordance with the FAA Determination of No
Hazard issued on October 17, 2006, or most current FAA Determination of No
Hazard, or in accordance with a similar finding in an independent study by a
qualified private consultant that has been certified by the FAA stating that the
project presents no hazard to flight operations at John Wayne Airport. The FAA
Determination of No Hazard issued on October 17, 2006 established a maximum
building height of 306 feet above mean sea level for the proposed high-rise
residential towers at 585 and 595 Anton Boulevard.
EXHIBIT "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Ping. 1.
Final Master Plan PA -14-11 shall comply with the conditions of
approval, code requirements, and mitigation measures of Final Program
EIR No. 1052 and Addendum to the EIR for this project and as listed in
the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program (Exhibit "C"). Additional
conditions of approval are also included as part of the Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
2.
Mitigation Measures from Final Program EIR #1052 have been included
as conditions of approval. If any of these conditions are removed, the
City Council must make a finding that the project will not result in
significant environmental impacts, that the condition(s) are within the
responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency, or that specific
economic, social, or other considerations make the mitigation measures
infeasible.
3.
The conditions of approval, mitigation measure and code requirements
for PA -14-11 shall be blueprinted on the page following or containing
the site plan.
4.
The Applicant shall effectively manage tenant and guest parking onsite
and employ necessary measures (e.g. valet parking, mechanical lift
parking, tandem parking, etc.) as needed. If onsite parking is not
appropriately managed, the Development Services Director shall require
implementation of corrective measure(s) to address onsite parking
problems in the future; require that the property management company
with a towing service to enforce the parking regulations.
5.
Applicant shall indicate on the final parking management plan how
parking shall be assigned. The parking management plan shall be
approved prior to issuance of building permits. The number of parking
stalls and configuration may be adjusted pursuant to the review and
approval of the Development Services Director, provided that tenant
parking is within the range of 1.5 to 2.0 spaces per unit and guest
parking is provided at a minimum of 0.5 parking spaces per unit for the
first 50 units and 0.25 parking spaces for each unit above 50, as
stipulated.
6.
The FAA No Hazard Determination shall be current and valid at the time
of issuance of a building permit. Any required modifications to the
building, including but not limited to, the building height or
appurtenances, required by the No Hazard Determination shall be
reflected in the building plans prior to building permit issuance.
7.
The applicant shall meet all obligations pursuant to terms and
conditions of Development Agreement DA -14-03 to be considered and
adopted by a separate resolution by the City Council, as applicable.
8.
The previous entitlements for the 300 -room hotel and 484 -unit
Symphony Towers project shall be null and void upon issuance of
building permits for the proposed project. This condition does not apply
to Final Master Plan PA -07-29 for Parking Structure B. Any modification
to this condition requires PC approval.
9. Ancillary retail shall be limited to approximately 4,100 square feet of
walk-up retail unless additional parking is provided subject to review and
approval of the Development Services Director. The retail area(s) shall
consist of retail businesses such as, but not limited to, periodical
stand/kiosk, cafe, sandwich shop, juice bar, neighborhood drycleaner,
or other similar uses as deemed appropriate by the Development
Services Director. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy,
developer shall provide a matrix of permitted walk-up retail uses to be
approved by the Development Services Director.
10. Prior to issuance of grading permits, developer shall submit for review
and approval a Construction Management Plan. This plan features
methods to minimize disruption to the neighboring residential uses to
the fullest extent that is reasonable and practicable. The plan shall
include construction parking and vehicle access and specifying staging
areas and delivery and hauling truck routes. The plan should mitigate
disruption to residents and also businesses during construction. The
truck route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas
and major truck traffic during peak hours. The total truck trips to the site
shall not exceed 200 trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus
100 truck trips from the site) unless approved by the Development
Services Director or Transportation Services Manager. The project
construction traffic shall not use the streets that are within the adjacent
residential neighborhoods.
11. Developer shall submit a signed and completed Maintenance
Agreement to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director and
City Attorney's office requiring the developer to be 100% responsible for
maintenance of the landscape easement and parkway area along
Avenue of the Arts and Anton Boulevard within the project boundaries.
12. The site plan / building plan shall show provisions for the placement of
centralized mail delivery units, if applicable. Specific locations for such
units shall be to the satisfaction of the Planning Division, Engineering
Division, and the US Postal Service.
13. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall contact the U.S.
Postal Service with regard to location and design of mail delivery
facilities. Such facilities shall be shown on the site plan, landscape
plan, and/or floor plan.
14. The range of primary street addresses shall be displayed on a complex
identification sign visible from the street. Street address numerals shall
be a minimum 12 inches in height with not less than 3/4 -inch stroke and
shall contrast sharply with the background.
15. Address assignment shall be requested from the Planning Division prior
to submittal of working drawings for plan check. The approved address
of individual units, suites, buildings, etc, shall be blueprinted on the site
plan and on all floor plans in the working drawings.
16. The subject property's ultimate finished grade level may not be
filled/raised in excess of 30" above the finished grade of any abutting
property. If additional fill dirt is needed to provide acceptable onsite
storm water flow to a public street, an alternative means of
accommodating that drainage shall be approved by the City's Building
Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of any grading or building
permits. Such alternatives may include subsurface tie-in to public storm
water facilities, subsurface drainage collection systems and/or sumps
with mechanical pump discharge in -lieu of gravity flow. If mechanical
pump method is determined appropriate, said mechanical pump(s) shall
continuously be maintained in working order. In any case, development
of the subject property shall preserve or improve the existing pattern of
drainage on abutting properties.
17. Street trees in the landscape parkway shall be selected from Appendix
D of the Streetscape and Median Development Standards and
appropriately sized and spaced (e.g. 15 -gallon size planted at 30' on
centers), or as determined by the Development Services Director once
the determination of parkway size is made. The final landscape
concept plan shall indicate the design and material of these areas, and
the landscape/hardscape plan shall be approved by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
18. Prior to submission of a final landscape plan, developer shall seek
approval from the Parks and Recreation Commission for the removal of
any trees within the public right-of-way. Commission will require that the
City be compensated for the loss of street trees in the public right-of-
way pursuant to a 3 -to -1 tree replacement ratio. Any conditions
imposed by the Parks and Recreation Commission shall be identified on
the final landscape plan. The developer is advised that the approval
process may take up to three months; therefore, it is advised to identify
any affected trees and make a timely application to the Parks and
Recreation Commission to avoid possible delays.
19. Building wall signage shall be limited to identification of the residential
development or walk-up retail businesses subject to review and
approval by Director of Development Services.
20. The developer shall contact the current cable service provider prior to
issuance of building permits to arrange for pre -wiring for future cable
communication service.
21. The developer shall contact the Planning Division to arrange for an
inspection of the site prior to the final inspections. This inspection is to
confirm that the conditions of approval and code requirements have
been satisfied.
22. Nighttime lighting shall be minimized to provide adequate security and
creative illumination of building, sculptures, fountains, artworks, and
light boxes/monument display cases to the satisfaction of the
Development Services Director. Any lighting under the control of the
developer shall be directed in such a manner so as to not unreasonably
interfere with the quiet enjoyment of nearby residences.
23. Mid -rise residential structures shall use low reflective glass and building
materials to minimize daytime glare to the fullest extent possible.
24. Landscape plans shall show methods of screening for all ground -
mounted equipment (backflow prevention devices, Fire Department
connections, electrical transformers, etc.). With the exception of back-
flow prevention devices, ground -mounted equipment shall not be
located in any landscaped setback visible from the street and shall be
screened from view, under the direction of Planning Staff.
25. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a
Lighting Plan and Photometric Study for the approval of the City's
Development Services Department. The Lighting Plan shall
demonstrate compliance with the following:
• The mounting height of lights on light standards shall not exceed
18 feet in any location on the project site unless approved by the
Development Services Director;
• The intensity and location of lights on buildings shall be limited to
minimize nighttime light and glare to residents and shall be subject to
the Development Services Director's approval;
4otometric
All site lighting fixtures shall be provided with a flat glass lens.
calculations shall indicate the effect of the flat glass lens
fixture efficiency; and
• Lighting design and layout shall limit spill light to no more than
0.5 foot-candle at the property line of the surrounding properties,
consistent with the level of lighting that is determined necessary for
safety and security purposes on site.
26. Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its
elected and appointed officials, agents, officers and employees from
any claim, action, or proceeding (collectively referred to as
"proceeding") brought against the City, its elected and appointed
officials, agents, officers or employees arising out of (1) City's approval
of the project, including but not limited to any proceeding under the
California Environmental Quality Act. The indemnification shall include,
but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the
City, if any, and cost of suit, attorney's fees, and other costs, liabilities
and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether
incurred by the applicant, the City and/or the parties initiating or bringing
such proceeding. This indemnity provision shall include the applicant's
obligation to indemnify the City for all the City's costs, fees, and
damages that the City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions
set forth in this section.
27. Prior to issuance of the final certificate of occupancy for the first building
constructed, displaced parking shall be provided for South Coast Metro
in the form of an additional 220 spaces in parking structure "B" (as
approved — PA -07-29), or alternative measures approved by the
Planning Director.
28. Prior to issuance of building permits, the building plans shall
demonstrate that all units are equipped with a mechanical ventilation
system that will properly filter the indoor air. The ventilation system can
be a component of the air conditioning system with the distinction being
that clean, ventilated air flow does not necessarily need coolant.
29. Developer shall submit a detailed Landscape Plan for the public and
private open spaces, for review and approval by the Development
Services Department, prior to any construction landscape improvements.
The plan shall include all decorative hardscape and landscape
improvements as shown on the conceptual plans to provide visual relief
Park
Eng
-me
for the project from the street. Final materials shall be subject to approval
by the Planning Division.
30. It is recommended that the project incorporate green building design
and construction techniques where feasible. The applicant may contact
the Building Safety Division at (714) 754-5273 for additional information.
CAL Green Code or higher as determined by applicant.
31. If the project is subdivided as condominiums, the applicant shall pay Park
fee prior to submittal of the final Tract Map. Applicable fees shall be that
fee in effect at the time the final map is approved by the City Council
when building permits are issued.
32. The proposed development is pending approval of vacation of a portion
25 -foot "Landscape and Sidewalk Easement" along Anton Avenue to a
minimum of 7 -feet to provide the minimum clearance for a public
sidewalk. This modification is subject to final approval by City Council.
No portions of the patios, stoops or planter walls shall encroach into the
final easement.
33. The utility easements (within the property referred to as pole lines and
conduit easement in recorded Instrument No. 83-515838) that are in
conflict with the proposed project shall be either vacated or relocated
prior to issuance of a Grading Permit.
34. Comply with the requirements of the adopted 2013 California Building
Code, 2013 California Electrical code, 2013 California Mechanical code
2013 California Plumbing code , 2013 California Green Building
Standards Code and 2010 California Energy Code (or the applicable
adopted, California Building code California Electrical code, California
Mechanical code California Plumbing Code, California Green Building
Standards and California Energy Code at the time of plan submittal or
permit issuance ) and California Code of Regulations also known as the
California Building Standards Code, as amended by the City of Costa
Mesa.
35. Sanitary Code Requirements #16 - Applicant shall contact the Air
Quality Management District (AQMD) at (800) 288-7664 for potential
additional conditions of development or for additional permits required
by AQMD.
36. Sanitary Code Requirements #19 - Comply with the requirements of the
California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to determine if
red imported fire ants exist on the property prior to any soil movement or
excavation. Call CDFA at (714) 708-1910 for information.
37. This project shall comply with the in -Building Public Safety Radio
System Coverage per section 5+-130 to 5-137 of the Costa Mesa
Municipal Code. At plan check submittal 6 copies of an in -building
Public Safety Radio System Coverage report (Radio system report)
shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division. The Radio
System report shall be certified by an FCC licensed radio technician as
provided by the property owner/applicant. The technician is required by
section 5-133 to conduct initial tests and shall be employed by the
owner, the engineer or architect of record, or agent of the owner, but not
by the contractor or any other person responsible for the work.
38. Submit a precise grading plans, an erosion control plan and a hydrology
study.
39.
Submit a soils report for this project. Soil's Report recommendations
shall be blueprinted on both the architectural and the precise grading
plans.
40.
On graded sites the top of exterior foundation shall extend above the
elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an
approved discharge devise a minimum of 12 inches plus 2 percent.
2013 California Building Code CBC 1808.7.4.
The ground immediately adjacent to the foundation shall be sloped
away from the building at a slope of not less than 5% for a minimum of
10 ft. measured perpendicular to the face of the wall. CBC 1803.3.
41.
Projections, including eaves, shall be one-hour fire resistive
construction, heavy timber or of noncombustible material if they project
into a 5 -foot setback area from the property line. They may project a
maximum of 12 inches beyond the 3 -foot setback. CRC Tables
R302.1(1) and R302.1(2).
42.
Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of plans for plan check, the
applicant shall prepare and submit documentation for compliance with
the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Water Quality
Order 99-08-DWQ; National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Permit No. CAS000002 for Storm Water Discharges
Associated with Construction Activity (General Permit); the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Santa Ana Region
Order No. R8-2002-0010 and NPDES Permit No. CAS618030; and, the
City of Costa Mesa Ordinance No. 97-20 for compliance with NPDES
Permit for the City of Costa Mesa. Such documentation shall include a
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) identifying and detailing the
implementation of the applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs).
Trans. 43.
Construct median modifications on Anton Boulevard to accommodate
left turn movements into the site. Construct wide flare or radius curb
drive approaches at approved locations.
44.
Comply with minimum clearance requirements from property lines and
any vertical obstructions.
45.
Identify ramp slopes within the parking structure and comply with City
ramp slope standards. Ramps with parking shall not exceed 5% slope.
46.
A turnaround area shall be provided for dead-end conditions within the
visitor parking area within the parking structure to allow forward motion
for exiting when spaces are full.
47.
Submit a parking plan denoting location of security gates if any, and
how gates will be operated. Relocate/remove affected utilities/parkway
trees on Anton Boulevard and Avenue of the Arts to accommodate new
drive approaches.
48.
Applicant/Developer is hereby advised that no removal of trees from the
public right-of-way will be permitted without specific approval from the
Parks and Recreation Commission and compliance with mitigation
measures as determined by the Commission to relocate the trees
and/or to compensate the city for the loss of trees from the public right-
of-way. Conditions of the Parks and Recreation Commission must be
incorporated onto the plans prior to plan approval. The approval
process may take up to three months, therefore, the applicant/developer
is advised to identify all trees affected by the proposed project and
make timely application to the Parks and Recreation Commission to
avoid possible delays.
49.
Twelve months after the issuance of certificate of occupancy of
complete project or when the units are over 80% occupied, whichever is
earlier, the Developer shall fund a study of the traffic operations at the
project access driveway along Anton Boulevard between Avenue of the
Arts and Sakioka Drive. The focus of the study will be to review the left
turn movements at the project driveway to/from Anton Blvd. The scope,
methodology, and consultant shall be approved by the City prior to the
initiation of the traffic operations study. The study shall be reviewed and
approved by the City prior to public release. The traffic study will
analyze the level of service and other traffic operation indicators
(crashes and queuing) for the intersection of Project Driveway/Anton
Boulevard. If the analyses show that the level of service and/or at least
one other traffic operation indicator exceed the City's significance
thresholds and/or Caltrans criteria, whichever is applicable, the
developer will be responsible for constructing a "pork chop" island at the
driveway which will prohibit exiting left -turns from the driveway onto
Anton Boulevard and/or reconstructing the median on Anton Boulevard
to prohibit left -turns into the site from Anton Boulevard.
50.
Construct 6 -foot wide sidewalk on Anton Boulevard in accordance with
Master Plan of Highways requirements. Any alternative designs
incorporating full width sidewalk in the vicinity of the retail business
space is subject to review and approval by Public Services Director.
51.
Construct wide flare on radius curb drive approaches at approved
locations. Comply with minimum clearance requirements from property
lines and any vertical obstructions.
52.
Provide a combined Fire Sprinkler/Standpipe System in accordance
Fire
with NFPA 13 and 14, 2013 Ed.
53.
All Stairways shall be provided with wet Class I Fire Standpipes in
accordance with NFPA 14.
54.
Provide Fire Hydrants per direction from Fire Department. See Fire
Prevention.
55.
Provide Emergency Responder Radio Coverage per CMC and
California Fire Code, 2013.
56.
A Fire Master Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Fire
Department prior to architectural plan submittal. See Fire Prevention.
Police 57.
Developer shall work with the Police Department in implementing
security recommendations to the maximum extent feasible. For
example, developer shall provide 24-hour on-site personnel for the
proposed project, install an on-site video surveillance system that will be
monitored by on-site personnel, and install a controlled access system
for all pedestrian and automobile access.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
The following list of federal, state and local laws applicable to the project has been
compiled by staff for the applicant's reference. All applicable federal, state, and local
laws which are applicable to the project shall be complied with, regardless of whether
they are identified herein. Any reference to "City" pertains to the City of Costa Mesa.
Ping. 1.
Approval of the final master plan shall expire within one year unless
the applicant applies for and is granted an extension of time for the
final master plan.
2.
Driveway ramp slopes shall comply with the standards contained in
the City's parking ordinance.
3.
Any mechanical equipment such as air-conditioning equipment and
duct work shall be screened from view in a manner approved by the
Planning Division. (Roof -mounted equipment enclosed in the
mechanical penthouse is permitted as part of the approval of the final
master plan.)
4.
Trash enclosure(s) or other acceptable means of trash disposal shall
be provided. Design of trash enclosure(s) shall conform with City
standards. Standard drawings are available from the Planning
Division.
5.
Hours of construction shall comply with Section 13-279, Title 13, of
the Costa Mesa Municipal Code.
6.
All contractors and subcontractors must have valid business licenses
to do business in the City of Costa Mesa. Final inspections, final
occupancy and final releases will not be granted until all such
licenses have been obtained.
7.
Development shall comply with all requirements of the North Costa
Mesa Specific Plan relating to development standards, maximum
building square footage, height, etc. for residential high-rise projects.
8.
All on-site utility services shall be installed underground.
9.
Installation of all utility meters shall be performed in a manner so as
to obscure the installation from view from any place on or off the
property. The installation vault, wall cabinet, or wall box under the
direction of the Planning Division.
10.
Two (2) sets of detailed landscape and irrigation plans, which meet the
requirements set forth in Costa Mesa Municipal Code Sections 13-101
through 13-108 and the City's Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines,
shall be required as part of the project plan check review and approval
process. Plans shall be forwarded to the Planning Division for final
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
11.
Two (2) sets of landscape and irrigation plans, approved by the Planning
Division, shall be attached to two of the final building plan sets.
12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with the
approved plans prior to final inspection or occupancy clearance.
13. All compact parking spaces shall be clearly marked "compact" or "small
car only".
14. Parking stalls shall be double -striped in accordance with City
standards.
15. Driveway ramp slope shall comply with the standards contained in the
City's parking ordinance.
Bldg. 16. Comply with the requirements of the California Code of Regulations,
Title 24, also known as the California Building Standards Code, as
amended by the City of Costa Mesa.
17. Comply with the requirements of the 2013 California Building Code, 2013
California Residential Code, 2013 California Electrical Code, 2013
California Mechanical Code, 2013 California Plumbing Code, 2013
California Green Building Standards Code and 2013 California Energy
Code (or the applicable adopted, California Building Code, California
Residential Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code,
California Plumbing Code, California Green Building Standards, and
California Energy Code at the time of plan submittal or permit issuance)
and California Code of Regulations also known as the California Building
Standards Code, as amended by the City of Costa Mesa. Areas of
alteration and additions shall comply with 2013 California Green Building
Standards Code section 5.303.2 and 5.303.2.
18. Prior to issuance of grading permit, developer shall submit soils
report, grading, and drainage plans, and final Water Quality
Management Plan for this project.
19. Demolition permits for existing structures shall be obtained and all work
and inspections completed prior to final building inspections. Applicant
is notified that written notice to the Air Quality Management District may
be required ten (10) days prior to demolition.
Bldg. 20. The project applicant shall require the contractor to comply with the
SCAQMD's regulations during construction, including Rule 402 which
specifies that there be no dust impacts offsite sufficient to cause a
nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions
from construction. Specific measures to reduce fugitive dust shall
include the following:
a. Moisten soil prior to grading.
b. Water exposed surfaces at least twice a day under calm
conditions and as often as needed on windy days when winds
are less than 25 miles per day or during very dry weather in
order to maintain a surface crust and prevent the release of
visible emissions from the construction site.
c. Treat any area that will be exposed for extended periods with a
soil conditioner to stabilize soil or temporarily plant with
vegetation.
d. Wash mud -covered tires and under -carriages of trucks leaving
construction sites.
e. Provide for street sweeping, as needed, on adjacent roadways
to remove dirt dropped by construction vehicles or mud which
would otherwise be carried off by trucks departing project sites.
f. Securely cover loads of dirt with a tight fitting tarp on any truck
leaving the construction sites to dispose of excavated soil.
g. Cease grading during periods when winds exceed 25 miles per
hour.
h. Provide for permanent sealing of all graded areas, as applicable,
at the earliest practicable time after soil disturbance. A screen
shall be provided at a reasonable height to ensure construction
dust and debris are contained as much as possible to prevent
impacts from construction on neighboring properties.
21. The proposed project shall comply with Title 24 of the California Code
of Regulations established by the Energy Commission regarding
energy conservation standards. The project applicant shall
incorporate the following in building plans:
• Solar or low emission water heaters shall be used with combined
space/water heater units.
• Double paned glass or window treatment for energy conservation
shall be used in all exterior windows.
Eng. 22. Developer shall contact the Mesa Water District — Engineering Desk
and submit application and plans for project review. Customer must
obtain a letter of approval and a letter of project completion from the
Mesa Water District.
23. Fulfill City of Costa Mesa Drainage Ordinance No. 06-19
requirements prior to approval of plans.
24. At the time of development submit for approval an Offsite Plan to the
Engineering Division and Grading Plan to the Building Division that
shows Sewer, Water, Existing Parkway Improvements and the limits
of work on the site, and hydrology calculations, both prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer or Architect. Cross lot drainage shall not
occur. Construction Access approval must be obtained prior to
Building or Engineering Permits being issued by the City of Costa
Mesa. Pay Offsite Plan Check fee per Section 13-231 of the
C.C.M.M.C. and an approved Offsite Plan shall be required prior to
Engineering Permits being issued by the City of Costa Mesa.
25.
Pay Offsite Plan Check fee per Section 13-231 of the C.C.M.M.C.
and an approved Offsite Plan shall be required prior to Engineering
Permits being issued by the Cit of Costa Mesa.
26.
Obtain a permit from the City of Costa Mesa, Engineering Division, at
the time of development and then construct P.C.C. sidewalk per City
of Costa Mesa Standards as shown on the Offsite Plan, including four
(4) feet clear around obstructions in the sidewalk.
27.
For demolition, grading, or building permits involving projects with a
valuation of $10,000 or more, the contractor shall use a City -
permitted hauler(s) to haul any debris or solid waste from the job site
(refer to Section 8-83(h), Regulations, of Title 8 of the Costa Mesa
Municipal Code). Use of a City -permitted hauler for such projects is
the responsibility of the designated contractor. Non-compliance is
subject to an administrative penalty as follows: $1,000 or 3% of the
total project value, whichever is greater.
28.
Maintain the public right-of-way in a "wet -down" condition to prevent
excessive dust and promptly remove any spillage from the public
right-of-way by sweeping or sprinkling.
Trans. 29.
Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall remit required
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee currently estimated at
$838,742.22. This fee is subject to revision and possible increase
effective July 1St of each year.
30.
Prior to issuance of building permit, developer shall fulfill mitigation of
off-site traffic impacts to the Planning Division. The Traffic Impact fee
is currently estimated at $329,481.00 calculated based upon the
average daily trip generation rate for residential dwelling units and the
retail space and includes a credit for existing uses. The Traffic Impact
Fee will be recalculated at the time of issuance of building permit
based on any changes in the prevailing schedule of charges adopted
by City Council and effective at that time.
31.
Developer shall provide a 25 -foot minimum distance from the far side
of the proposed drive aisle for all parking spaces to provide adequate
space for turning movements. Developer shall comply with the City's
Parking Design Standards.
SPECIAL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS
The requirements of the following special districts are hereby forwarded to the applicant:
Sani 1.
Developer shall contact the Costa Mesa Sanitary District at (949) 645-
8400 for current district requirements.
AQMD 2.
Applicant shall contact the Air Quality Management District (800) 288-
7664 for potential additional conditions of development or for additional
permits required by the district.
School 3.
Pay applicable Newport Mesa Unified School District fees to the Building
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
State 4. Comply with the requirements of the California Department of Food and
Agriculture (CDFA) to determine if red imported fire ants (RIFA) exist on
the property prior to any soil movement or excavation. Call CDFA at
(714) 708-1910 for information.