The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1029 DAMASCUS CIR - Building Permits(714) 754-5273 • Fax (714) 754-4856 • www.ci.costa-mesa.caa..UILDING PERMIT 77 FAIR DRIVE, COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Job Address: 1029 DAMASCUS CI Suite: Vicinity: ROOF Parcel Number: 41237140 Zoning: R1 R1 Applicant: VINNY LE SMIP Res: $0.56 Address: 9612 SUTHERLAND WAY Other: $0.00 Inspection: $0.00 Phone: (714)541-5351 GARDEN GROVE, CA Zip: 92844 Owner: BACHOMAL, SUNDER TR Address 2171 MARSELINA Phone: TUSTIN, CA Zip: 92782-8706 Contractor: WESTMINSTER ROOFING CO Address: 9612 SUTHERLAND WAY Phone: (714) 541-5351 GARDEN GROVE, CA Zip: 92844 License: 694940 Arch : Eng: Address: Address: Status: ISSUED Applied: 07/21/2003 Issued: 07/21/2003 ISSUED BY: C V Phone: Phone: Zip: License: License: SCOPE OF PERMIT TEAR OFF EXISTING ROOF. INSTALL CDX PLYWOOD, 30# FELT, 40 YEAR COMPOSITION SHINGLES, ELKS, CLASS A, FIBERGLASS. 24 SQUARES INCLUDES ATTACHED GARAGE. Total: $125.81 PLANNING & ZONING SETBACKS MAIN STRUCTURE Front 0-0 Rear 0-0 Left 0-0 Right 0-0 ACCESSORY Front 0-0 Rear 0-0 Left 0-0 Right 0-0 PARKING Existing: 0 Required: 0 Proposed: 0 NOTICE: The work authorized by this permit shall comply with all applicable handicap access requirements under California statutes and related regulations. (Ord. No. 92-28, § 1, 12-21-92) EXPIRATION: This permit shall automatically expire and become void if work is not commenced within 180 days, or if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days. INSPECTIONS: In order for the work authorized under this permit to be considered legal, such work must comply with all applicable codes, and all required Inspections and final approval must be obtained. Failure to obtain inspections and final approval will result in the expiration of this permit. FOR INSPECTIONS CALL: (714) 754-5626 ano-no bawl FEE SUMMARY Plan Check: $0.00 Calc Valuation: $5,600.00 Permit: $125.25 Claim Valuation: $5,600.00 SMIP Res: $0.56 SMIP Com: $0.00 Other: $0.00 Inspection: $0.00 Total: $125.81 PLANNING & ZONING SETBACKS MAIN STRUCTURE Front 0-0 Rear 0-0 Left 0-0 Right 0-0 ACCESSORY Front 0-0 Rear 0-0 Left 0-0 Right 0-0 PARKING Existing: 0 Required: 0 Proposed: 0 NOTICE: The work authorized by this permit shall comply with all applicable handicap access requirements under California statutes and related regulations. (Ord. No. 92-28, § 1, 12-21-92) EXPIRATION: This permit shall automatically expire and become void if work is not commenced within 180 days, or if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days. INSPECTIONS: In order for the work authorized under this permit to be considered legal, such work must comply with all applicable codes, and all required Inspections and final approval must be obtained. Failure to obtain inspections and final approval will result in the expiration of this permit. FOR INSPECTIONS CALL: (714) 754-5626 ano-no bawl DECLARATIl WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION: r I hereby affirm under penalty of perjuryone of the following declarations: ' ❑ 1 have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self -Insure for workers' compensation, as provided for by section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. ❑ 1 have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit Is issued. My workers' compensation Insurance carder and policy number are: Carder: :E2:z�G��' Policy Number: i� C7,,e permit is velue�a! (This section need not be completed if thone hundred dollars ($100) or less.) ❑ 1 certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and agree that if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall forthwith comply with these provlsi S. Applicant SignatureDate: C�%/iLl'�� WARNING: FAILURE TO SEC RS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO Ci INAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARE ($100,000), IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY'S FEES, LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION: I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Cade, and my license is in full force and effect. Lic. # _�6� i Vii- ioT�i Class # _ Contractor's Signature: Date: CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY: ❑ 1 hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (Sec. 3097, Civil Code). Lenders Name: Lenders Address: Signature: Date: OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATIONS: I hereby affirm that under penalty of perjury that I am EXEMPT FROM THE CONTRACTORS LICENSE LAW for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5, Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he or she is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractors License Law (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he or she is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500).): ❑ I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, WILL DO THE WORK, and the structure Is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or herself or through his or her own employees, provided that such improvements are not Intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he or she did not build or improve for purpose of sale.). ❑ 1, as owner of the property, am EXCLUSIVELY CONTRACTING WITH LICENSED CONTRACTORS to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such project with a contractor(s) license pursuant to the Contractors License Laws.). ❑ I am exempt under sec. Business and Professions Code for this reason: Signature: Date: Owner 10 verified by drivers license. ❑ Yes ❑ No Drivers License No. Expires: Verification of Ownership by (type of document, i.e. - property tax bill or deed): DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY PERMIT CERTIFICATION: ❑ 1 hereby certify that no excavation five (5) or more feet in depth into which a person is required to descend, will be made in connection with work authorized by this permit, and that no building structure, scaffolding, falsework, or demolition or dismantling thereof, will be more than thirty-six (36) feet high. (Chap. 3.2, Grp 2, Art 2, Sec. 341, Title 8, California AdministrativeCode). ❑ As owner -builder, I will not employ anyone to do work which would require a permit from the Division of Industrial Safety, as noted above, unless such person has a permit to do such work from the division. Signature: Date: Division of Industrial Safety Permit Number: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND EMISSIONS CERTIFICATION: 1 Will the applicant or present or future building occupant need to file and certify a Business Plan for emergency response to release or threatened release of a hazardous material? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Section 25505 of the California Health and Safety Code requires, with some exceptions, that a Business Plan be filed with the Costa Mesa Fire Department by every business which has at any one time during a reported year a quantity of hazardous materials equal to or greater than a weight of 500 pounds, or a volume of 55 gallons, or 200 cubic feet of compressed gas at standard temperature and pressure). ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Dces or will the applicant or present or future building occupant need to file a registration form for acutely hazardous materials? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Section 25533 of the California Health and Safety Code, with some exceptions, requires registration with the Costa Mesa Fire Department by each business which at any one time has on hand a quantity of acutely hazardous materials equal to or greater than a weight of 500 pounds, or a volume of 55 gallons, or 200 cubic feet of compressed gas at standard temperature and pressure). ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ... ...................................................... 3 Does or.......will the applicant or present or future building occupant need to prepare an RMPP (Risk Management and Prevention Program for acutely hazardous materials)? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Section 25534 of the California Health and Safety Code provides that the Costa Mesa Fire Department may require the preparation, certification and filing with the Fire Department of an RMPP by businesses which are required to register acutely hazardous materials with the Fire Department. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 If an RMPP is presently required, has Section 25534 of the California Health and Safety Code been fully complied with? ❑ Yes [:1 No ...............................................................................I.........................................................................................................................................................................................................,....................................................................... 5 Does or will the applicant or present or future building occupant require for the work which is the subject of this application apermit for such construction or modification from the South Coast Air Quality Management District or from any other air pollution control district or agency? Ll Yes ❑ No (Section 65850.2 of the California Government Code requires that the requested information be furnished on applications for non-residential building permits). .................................................................................................................................. ....................... ......I........................................................................................................ 6 Will any part of the facility to be constructed under this permit be within 1000 feet from the outer boundaries of a school? ❑ Yes ❑ No (If -yes-, the facility must meet the requirement of Sections 25534 and 42303 of the California Health and Safety Code). ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 If a permit from the South Coast Air Quality Management District or other air pollution control district or agency is required for the work which is the subject of this application, have all of the disclosures prescribed by California Health and Safety Cade Section 42303 been made? ❑ Yes ❑ No .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................ 8 (If "yes", attach certificate of compliance from the appropriate air pollution control officer). CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: I certify that under penalty of perjury the information given above is correct. I agree to comply with all state laws and city ordinances regarding Hazardous Materials and Emissions. Signature: Date: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AND AUTHORIZATION OF ENTRY: I certify under penalty of perjury that I have read this application and state that the information given is correct. I agree to comply with all stale laws and city ordinances relating to building construction, and authorize representatives of the City of Costa Mesa to enter upon the above-described/property for inspection purposes. I agree not to occupy or allow occupancy of any building authorized by this permit until final inspection. Signature Of Legal Own r(s Date And/Or Au rued Applicant �^%— a CODE E, INSPECTION TYPE 2&N LOCALS CODE d INSPECTION TYPE 2ATE INCL¢ 1616 Fixed System Final Fire Prevention 206 Final Mechanical 1266 Pool Spa Final 208 Final Plumbing 200 Final Re -Roof 210 Final Electrical 201 Final Block/Retaining Well 212 Final Fire Prevention 202 Final Factory Fire Place 220 Final Planning Approval 203 Final Sign 222 Final Site 204 Final Demolition 250 Final Building/Occupancy west coast lumber inspection bure 6990 S.W. Varna Rd. • Portland, Oregon 97223 • Phone (503) 639-0651 Melling Address: P.O. Box 23145 • Portland, Oregon 97223 P.O. Box 728 Lomita, Ca. 90717 April 2, 1979 Warington Lbr. Co. 7641 Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove, Ca. 92641 1029 Damascus Circle Costa Mesa, Ca. On April 2, 1979 as requested by Mr. Keith Gravenson of Waring -ton Lumber Co. and accompanied by Mr. Gian Chandani, Owner. I made a visual inspection of 1-8 X 14 - 20' DF-S4S-Grn. in position at cap- tioned address. The 8 X 14 - 20' was located in the garage as a support system for above bedroom. The 8 X 14 appeared to be of grade #1 Structual. In- spection was made and decision arrived at by visible portions of beam. Beam was checked which is a normal drying process in a green beam. Grades.in accordance with Standard Grading Rule #16 of this Burea. Very truly yours, Hershel Adams Regional Manager cc: Mr. Gian Chandani, 1029 Damascus Circle Costa Mesa, Ca. Foley Const. Co., Inc., Suite 100- 2101 E. 4th St., Sanat Ana, Ca. 92705 .4 F (5)zIEY May 81 1979 Mr. William Kumer Building.Director City of Costa Mesa P. O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, California 92626 RE: Mr. & Mrs. S. B. Gianchandani 1029 Damascus Circle, Costa Mesa Dear Mr. Kumer: This office has been advised through a Correction Notice issued by your inspector, Mr. B. McGeough, that in his opinion checking in a beam in the garage of the above -referenced property "appears to be excessive," and that "it probably needs to be engineered." This is not our first notice of this situation, and perhaps a brief recount of past events is in order. We were made aware of beam checking in doing a service "walk- through" on November 21, 1978. At that time, direction was given to our framing foreman to investigate the situation. In the subsequent investigation, the lumber supplier was called into the matter since the structural integrity of the beam was being questioned. As is customary in these cases, the lumber supplier had the beam inspected by a qualified lumber grader from the West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau. The results of that inspection are enclosed. It should also be noted that there was no evidence in the areas of the structure being carried by the beam to indicate that it was not performing as it was designed. At this time, this office felt secure that the problem was one of aesthetics, not structural integrity, and offered to fill the checks and paint the otherwise unfinished beam. 2101 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE 100 & SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 TELEPHONE: 1714) 543-9471 Mr. William ;sumer May 8, 1979 Page 2 It is my opinion that this beam does not have to be engineered since it already has been, and appropriate calculations submitted to you at the time of plan check called for an 8" by 14" $1 Douglas Fir timber to carry the assigned loads. The determination of the proper performance of a structural member such as this is twofold: first, if there is evidence that the loads are not being carried properly, the situation does call for a structural engineering analysis; secondly, if the nature or quality of the timber is in question, the proper. investigating entity is a certified lumber grader. I do not know if Mr. McGeough was aware of these events prior to issuing the enclosed Correction Notice; however, I feel that the steps taken to date by Foley Construction Co., Incorporated, have been prudent and we remain eager to cosmetically treat the beam. Please contact me at your earliest convenience on this matter. Sincerely, J. J. McLaughlin President JJM/cj Enclosures of west coast • lumber inspection bureau 6980 B.W. Varna Rd. • Portland, Oregon 97223 • Phone (503) 639-0651 Melling Address: P.O. Box 23145 • Portland, Oregon 97223 P.O. Box 728 Lomita, Ca. 90717 April 2, 1979 Harington Lbr. Co. 7641 Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove, Ca. 92641 1029 Damascus Circle Costa Mesa, Ca. On April 2, 1979 as requested by Mr. Keith Gravenson of Harington Lumber Co. and accompanied by Mr. Gian Chandani, Owner. I made a visual inspection of 1-8 X 14 - 20' DF-S4S-Crn. in position at cap- tioned address. The 8 X 14 - 20' was located in the garage as a support system for above bedroom. The 8 X 14 appeared to be of grade 41 Structual. In- spection was made and decision arrived at by visible portions of beam. Beam was checked which is a normal drying process in a green beam. Grades.in accordance with Standard Grading Rule J16 of this Burea. Very truly yours, Hershel Adams Regional Manager cc: Mr. Gian Chandani, 1029 Damascus Circle, Costa Mesa, Ca. Foley Const. Co., Inc., Suite 100- 2101 E. 4th St., Sanat Ana, Ca. 92705 1 `I _f aL� u — COMOTLTV C7ZON cCO., ENCOLTP®RATED May 8, 1979 Mr. WillicLm Kumer Building Director City of Costa Mesa P. O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, California 92626 RE: Mr. & Mrs. S. B. Gianchandani 1029 Damascus Circle, Costa Mesa Dear Mr. Kumer: This office has been advised through a Correction Notice issued by your inspector, Mr. B. McGeough, that in his opinion checking in a beam in the garage of the above -referenced property "appears to be excessive," and that "it probably needs to be engineered." This is not our first notice of this situation, and perhaps a brief recount of past events is in order. We were made aware of beam checking in doing a service "walk- through" on November 21, 1978. At that time, direction was given to our framing foreman to investigate the situation. In the subsequent investigation, the lumber supplier was called into the matter since the structural integrity of the beam was being questioned. As is customary in these cases, the lumber supplier had the beam inspected by a qualified lumber grader from the West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau. The results of that inspection are enclosed. It should also be noted that there was no evidence in the areas of the structure being carried by the beam to indicate that it was not performing as it was designed. At this time, this office felt secure that the problem was one of aesthetics, not structural integrity, and offered to fill the checks and paint the otherwise unfinished beam. 2101 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE 100 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 9 TELEPHONE: (714) 5439471 Mrs. William Rumer May 8, 1979 Page 2 It is my opinion that this beam does not have to be engineered since it already has been, and appropriate calculations submitted to you at the time of plan check called for an 8" by 14" #1 Douglas Fir timber to carry the ass.igned loads. The determination of the proper performance of a structural member such as this is twofold: first, if there is evidence that the loads are not being carried properly, the situation does call for a structural engineering analysis; secondly, if the nature or quality of the timber is in question, the proper investigating entity is a certified lumber grader. I do not know if Mr. McGeough was aware of these events prior to issuing the enclosed Correction Notice; however, I feel that the steps taken to date by Foley Construction Co., Incorporated, have been prudent and we remain eager to cosmetically treat the beam. Please contact me at your earliest convenience on this matter. Sincerely, J. J. McLaughlin President JJM/cj Enclosures FOLEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INCORPORATE May 8, 1979 Mr. William Kumer Building Director City of Costa Mesa P. 0. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, California 92626 RE: Mr. & Mrs. S. B. Gianchandani 1029 Damascus Circle, Costa Mesa Dear Mr. Kumer: REo EIVED CITI PLANNING DEPT. v,, N? 0 PM AM 17-1 S 19 11011111211i213 i4i51 rQ This office has been advised through a Correction Notice issued by your inspector, Mr. B. McGeough, that in his opinion checking in a beam in the garage of the above -referenced property "appears to be excessive," and that "it probably needs to be engineered." This is not our first notice of this situation, and perhaps a brief recount of past events is in order. We were made aware of beam checking in doing a service "walk- through" on November 21, 1978. At that time, direction was given to our framing foreman to investigate the situation. In the subsequent investigation, the lumber supplier was called into the matter since the structural integrity of the beam was being questioned. As is customary in these cases, the lumber supplier had the beam inspected by a qualified lumber grader from the West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau. The results of that inspection are enclosed. It should also be noted that there was no evidence in the areas of the structure being carried by the beam to indicate that it was not performing as it was designed. At this time, this office felt secure that the problem was one of aesthetics, not structural integrity, and offered to fill the checks and paint the otherwise unfinished beam. 2101 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE 100 9 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 TELEPHONE: (714) 5439471 Mr. William Kumer May 8, 1979 Page 2 It is my opinion that this beam does not have to be engineered since it already has been, and appropriate calculations submitted to you at the time of plan check called for an 8" by 14" #1 Douglas Fir timber to carry the assigned loads. The determination of the proper performance of a structural member such as this is twofold: first, if there is evidence that the loads are not being carried properly, the situation does call for a structural engineering analysis; secondly, if the nature or quality of the timber is in question, the proper investigating entity is a certified lumber grader. I do not know if Mr. McGeough was aware of these events prior to issuing the enclosed Correction Notice; however, I feel that the steps taken to date by Foley Construction Co., Incorporated, have been prudent and we remain eager to cosmetically treat the beam. Please contact me at your earliest convenience on this matter. Enclosures APS 4 1979 L wast coast ember inspection bu.rea,u 6980 S.W. Varna Rd. • Portland, Oregon 97223 • Phone (503) 639-0651 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23145 • Portland, Oregon 97223 P.O. Dux 728 Larsita, Ca. 90717 WarinCton Lbr. Co. 70ill Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove, Ca. 92641 April 2, 1979 1029 D=aascus Circle Costa Maoa, Ca. On April 2, 1979 as requested.by Mr. Keith Gravenoon of Warington Lumber Co. anis aecompiviied by Mr. Ginn Chriridiuzi, Owner. I made a visual inapoction of 1-8 X lk - 20' Wb 34^a-Grn. iu position at cap- tioaed address. The 8 X 14 - 20' was located In t'ne Carnge as a support system for above bedroom. TLe 8 X 14 appeared to be of grade WHIl Structual. In-.. spection was rwado and decision arrived at by visible portions of . beam. Baez was checked which is a normal drying process in a g oan boam. Graded U accordance vith Standard Grading Rule #16 of tbls Durex., Vory truly yours., I.Torshel Adams X;ogional Manager. ' C6: Por. Gina Cha Irani, 1029 Damascus Circle, Costa Mesa, Ca. Foley Const. Co...Inc., Suits 100- :101 E. 4th St., Sanat Ana, Ca. 921705 OFFICES IN: Eugene., Oregon. Medford, Oregon Carson, Calilorruh OFFICERS: BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Fred Hichens Preseleut 0. Wayne Smith Doug Rand Dan Graham Fred Hi chens Sam Witzel Doug Rand Vice President Gordon Johnson Amos Horner Don -Lee Davidson Lew Merrill John Kelly Dan Graham Src,vraryd Trea.surm George Griswold Richard Cornish Milton Herbert Gordon K. Voget Lowell Ambrosini ttsul Nod onhetk Vine Prosidew Tnm Malin Jack Gales Evotim Johnson Farrier Panimrthy Evan Jeffreys IIVNUHAIIYi I'nul-Llan, Ale un.l n, mn •'fa tell `i -fln ♦ _. CORRECTION NOT ICE B'ding Safety De rtmW ent CIT F COSTA M A ?v"'^�.�` Vr/�FY/nr.. ie14A �7Y `iD1G'i416�c. WHEN CORRECTION IS MADE y� �„ _,✓// Please Notify Building Safety Department 9 556-5273 i n S. B. G(ANCMANDANI_j � gs�-bz� 1029 DAMASCUS CR COSTA MESA. CAL.. Cry 4e�°J COSTA MESA BUILDING -SAFETY DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 12DO COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 OCT 21-77Ppcnsa'B001082* ***317.71 AP Llf AVION FOR STRUCTURAL PERMIT For Applicant to Fill in Completely — Use Ink Only RECEMt I DATE RECEIVED 10-2, TE ISSUED DI �/ _7" ADDRESSBUILDING .OZ`% G ^^G/' �� PERMIT NO. OWNER FOLT'Y FAMILY TRUST A.P. NO. Cti/ MAIL 2101 E. Fourth St., #100 ADI RIES 1029 Damascus Circle ADDRESS TEL CITY Santa Ana, CA 92705 9901 TRACT 9901 LOT 38 BLOCK CONSTRUCTION U.C.B. W AAL.TER RFPAi LENDER BRANCH 101O N. Mann St. OWNER O ADDRESS Santa Ana CA 92704 WALUE aH- C�7 O Zn fM ARCHECTTE L. SE 1 $ OR ENGINE R Hales -Langston FIRE ADDRESS 777 S. Main 105 Orange 92668 ZONE 9PE GRO P APPROVED CONTRACTOR Foley ConStrUCtion Co. Inc. BY DATE ADDRESS Sam as above TEL. ZONE NO. OFUSE PLANS ) OF NEW CITY NO. _ BUILDING STATE CITY YARDS APPROVED YARDS APPROVE LIC. NO. LIC. NO. MAIN BUILDING ACCESSORY BUILDING SIZE NO.OF BLOCS. (FROM C/L STREET) OF LOT NOW ON LOT O FRONT 4 0FT. FT. USE OF N/A 16 61 EXISTING BLDG. B. aIDE FT FT Separate permits are required for L. SIDE /D FT. FT. 3O electric, plumbing and heating work. REAR FT. FT. USE OF BUILDING AND WORK TO BE PERFORMED DISTANCE BET. BET. MAIN & i MAIN SLOGS. ACCESS, BLDGS. New construction, single family DATE C ARP.. qW APPROVED detached, Plan 3, 4 Bedroaos. :7ROV6dwe 16.20-77 HOLD FOR SPECIALL REQUiREMENT' 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the above Information is correct and agree to comply with all laws regulating building construction, and I shall not employ any person in violation of the workman's compensation laws of the State of California. I hereby certify that I am properly licensed as a contractor under 2236 SD. FT. Gar. 477 sq.ft. THE AMOUNT SHOWN UNDER VALUATION IS FOR the State of California Business and Professions Code, Division 3, Chapter 9, and that such licenses are in full force and effect, or I THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A PERMIT FEE ONLY: em exempt from rho provisions of the State of California Business VALUATION PERMIT FEE E end Professions Code, D11.15on 3, Chapter 9. PLAN CHECK E /12 Signature of Permittee S TAX E 1 Authorize TOTALPAID E