HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-37 - Written Arguments Regarding Proposed Measure - Development ProjectsRESOLUTION NO. 16-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THE
PROPOSED MEASURE TO REQUIRE VOTER APPROVAL ON CERTAIN
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Costa Mesa,
California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2016, at which there will be submitted to the voters
the following measure:
Measure _: An Initiative To Require Voter Approval On
Certain Development Projects
Response
Vote
Shall the ordinance to require voter approval of development
projects that require adoption, amendment, change or
Yes
replacement of the General Plan, the Zoning Code, a specific
plan, or an overlay plan, and that generates over 200
No
additional trips, increases intersection volume/capacity,
changes the intersection utilization/level of service, adds 40
or more dwelling units, adds 10,000 sq.' of non-residential
use, or changes a public use to a private use under specified
conditions, be adopted?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council affirms for measures placed on the ballot by
petition, the persons filing an initiative petition, pursuant to Elections Code Section
9282(a) may file a written argument in favor of the ordinance, not exceeding 300 words,
and the legislative body may submit an argument against the ordinance.
SECTION 2. That the City Council authorizes the following member(s) of its body
James M. Righeimer, Mayor Pro Tem
to file a written argument Against Measure as specified above not exceeding 300
words, accompanied by the printed names(s) and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting
it, in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of
California. The arguments may be changed or withdrawn until and including June 17,
2016, 5:00 p.m., the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or against
the City measure may be submitted to the City Clerk.
Resolution No. 16-37 Page 1 of 3
The arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, with the printed name(s)
and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an organization,
the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at least one of its
principal officers who is the author of the argument. The arguments shall be accompanied
by the Form of Statement To Be Filed By Author(s) of Argument.
SECTION 3. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the
measure to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries of the office of the City
Attorney is affected.
a. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure not
exceeding 500 words showing the effect of the measure on existing law and
the operation of the measure. If a measure affects the organization or salaries
of the office of the City Attorney, the City Clerk shall prepare the impartial
analysis.
b. The analysis shall include a statement indicating whether the measure was
placed on the ballot by a petition signed by the requisite number of voters or by
the governing body of the city.
c. In the event the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot, nor in the
voter information portion of the sample ballot, there shall be printed immediately
below the impartial analysis, in no less than 10 -point type, the following: "The
above statement is an impartial analysis of Ordinance or Measure _. If you
desire a copy of the ordinance or measure, please call the election official's
office at 714-754-5225 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you.
d. The impartial analysis shall be filed by June 17, 2016, 5:00 p.m., the date set
by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution and ep�e�it into the book of original resolutions.
AND ADOPTED ON JUNE 7. 2016.
Stephen M. Mensinger, Mayor
ATTEST:
Brenda Green, Uy Clerk
FORM:
Tarquip'Prezi0$VDefiuty City Attorney
Resolution No. 16-37 Page 2 of 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
foregoing Resolution No. 16-37 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of June, 2016, by the
following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Foley, Genis, Monahan, Righeimer, and Mensinger
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 8th day of June, 2016.
BRENDA GRE9N, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 16-37 Page 3 of 3