Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
16-70 - Adopting Addedum SP-16-01 - Property located at 3350 Avenue of the Arts
RESOLUTION NO. 16-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 1054 (STATE CLEARING HOUSE NUMBER 2007011125) AND AMENDMENT TO NORTH COSTA MESA SPECIFIC PLAN (SP -16-01) RELATED TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the 2015-2035 General Plan on June 21, 2016; WHEREAS, the General Plan is a long-range, comprehensive document that serves as a guide for the orderly development of Costa Mesa; WHEREAS, by its very nature, the General Plan needs to be updated and refined to account for current and future community needs; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Costa Mesa adopted the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan by Resolution No. 94-67 in July 1994 to provide additional planning guidelines and standards for several large development areas located in north Costa Mesa; WHEREAS, within the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, General Plan 2015-2035 allowed an increase in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for Home Ranch site, an increase in the residential density for Sakioka Lot 2, and development flexibility for 3350 Avenue of the Arts within the trip budgets adopted by the Land Use and Circulation Elements; WHEREAS, the amendments promote diversity of development options at 3350 Avenue of The Arts are in conformance with the objectives of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and General Plan, including the following: Resolution No. 16-70 Page 1 of 4 • North Costa Mesa Specific Plan - Recognize the development potential of the planning area and the need to sensitively integrate new development with the surrounding areas, and therefore, promote both resident and business community confidence in the long-term vision for the plan area. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -2A: Promote land use patterns and development that contribute to community and neighborhood identity. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -6A: Ensure the long term productivity and viability of the community's economic base. General Plan Land Use Objective LU -4A: Encourage new development and redevelopment to improve and maintain the quality of the environment. • General Plan Land Use Objective LU -5A: Ensure availability of adequate community facilities and provision of the highest level of public services possible, taking into consideration budgetary constraints and effects on the surrounding area. WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 1054 (State Clearinghouse Number 2007011125) was certified on November 20, 2007 for the Wyndham Boutique Hotel 1 High -Rise and Final Master Plan PA -06-75 for the project that included 200 rooms and 120 for -sale condominium units; WHEREAS, in accordance with Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Sections 15162 and 15164, an addendum to the FEIR No. 1054 was prepared by BonTerra Psomas in August 2016 analyzing the environmental impacts associated with the change from residential units to hotel rooms; Resolution No. 16-70 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, in accordance with Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Section 15162 and 15164, the Addendum to the EIR determined that the proposed modifications to the project which allows for hotel rooms to replace the residential units does not require preparation of a subsequent EIR because the proposed changes would not result in new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified environmental impacts; WHEREAS, on August 22, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the amendment to the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan; WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on September 6, 2016 to allow for public comment on the proposed project and with all persons having been given the opportunity to be heard both for and against the proposed project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record, and the findings contained herein, the City Council adopts the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 and amendment to North Costa Mesa Specific Plan (SP -16-01) consistent with the provisions of the 2015-2035 General Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A to this resolution. Resolution No. 16-70 Page 3 of 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6tn day of September, 2016 ensinger, Mayor ATTEST: kog'& QaL� Brenda Green, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA} COUNTY OF ORANGE } CITY OF COSTA MESA ss APPROVED.A-. TO FORM: Thomas Duarr6, City Attorney I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 16-70 and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of September, 2016, by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Foley, Genis, Monahan, Righeimer, Mensinger NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 7th day of September, 2016. &Wk aKaw Brenda Green, dAy Clerk Resolution No. 16-70 Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A North Costa Mesa Specific Plan SP -10-01 REVISED PAGES REVISED 09-06-2016 3.0 SUBAREA ANALYSIS The plan area is composed of eight unique areas that are analyzed individually as well as inconsideration of surrounding land uses. AREA 1 -HOME RANCH Existing Land Uses A portion of this 93 -acre site is in agricultural production. Onsite structures include a single- family residence, barn, related farm buildings, and an office building located on Fairview Road. These are all owned by C.J. Segerstrom family. The single family home and barn are identified in the 2016 General Plan in the Historical and Cultural Resources Element. The Segerstrom family, who continue to maintain the house, constructed the farmhouse in 1915. The barn was constructed in 1928. Several farm related structures are located near the house. Single family attached and detached homes, an Emulex industrial park, and a large IKEA retail/warehouse facility also now sit on the original Home Ranch site. General Plan and Zoning The portions of this site owned by the Segerstrom family and IKEA are designated Commercial Center by the General Plan and is zoned PDC. The General Plan establishes site specific FAR of 0.37 for the 19.27 acre IKEA site and a site specific FAR of 0.64 for remaining 43.6 acres located south of South Coast Drive. In 2001, GP -00-05 was approved for Home Ranch to allow residential, commercial, office, and industrial uses. The overall allowable square footage was increased to 1,351,698 square feet and trip budget adjusted accordingly. In respect to this specific plan, the Home Ranch area was expanded to include the 30.5 acres located north of South Coast Drive. See following Sub -areas discussion. In 2003, SP -03-02 was approved that reallocated a 2.074 -acre portion of Sub -area B to Sub -area A to be used as the IKEA parking lot. This reallocation extinguished the square footage development rights attributable to the 2.074 acres, increasing the IKEA site to 19.27 acres and reducing the IKEA site FAR to 0.37 and the overall allowable square footage to 1,319,813; the overall trip budget remained unchanged. In 2016, General Plan 2015-2035 was approved adjusting the FAR of Sub -Area B resulting in an increase in the FAR and a maximum development square footage of 1,200,000 SF. Table 4A was modified to reflect this change. Sub -areas The Segerstrom Home Ranch is divided into four sub -areas. Table 4A provides a statistical summary of the maximum number of dwelling units, floor area ratio, building square footage, and the trip budgets for each sub -area. Figure 11 illustrates the boundaries of the sub -areas. To facilitate flexibility for Sub -Areas B and C, building square footages and trip budgets may be transferred, provided that the total building square footage, floor area ratio, and trip budget for the combined two sub -areas are not exceeded as delineated in Table 4A. Transfers affecting Sub -Areas A and D are not permitted. Future development in Sub -Area B shall be limited to high quality office, office- related uses, and corporate office/headquarters with subsidiary support functions that may include research and design, minor assembly, light manufacturing, and storage. Retail uses in Sub -Area B shall be limited to those that are ancillary to the office development Shown below are the development parameters for each distinct sub area. Table 4A Segerstrom Home Ranch Sub -Areas Land Use Acreage Floor Maximum Units/ Maximum A.M. P.M. Area Square Footage Stories/Heigh Peak Peak Ratio/ t Hour Hour A. I KEA 19.27 0.37 FAR 308,000 sf 2 stories/45 feet 43 431 B. Office and 43.572 0. 64 FAR 1,200,006 2-5 stories/36 - 1 1 Office -related 1,200,000 SF 75 feet 1,860 1,788 uses See Figure 11b C. Industrial 14.5 0.40 FAR 252,648sf 1-5 stories/45- 3763 3623 Park 60 feet See Figure iib D. 16.0 12 136 single-family 3 stories/ 50 feet Medium units/acre Attnnhed uniNi Residential 2 stories/27 feet 56single-family detached units` 102 130 Total Maximum: 192 units TOTAL: 93.34 NA 192 units 1,760,648 SF 2,381. 2,711 Note: 1 . The mix of units is for illustrative purposes only; the precise mix of product types will be determined during master plan review; in no instance shall the 192 -unit maximum and/or the morning and evening peak hour trip budget be exceeded. 2. The 1,200,000 maximum square footage is calculated based on the full acreage originally in Home Ranch which includes acreage transferred to the State of California for public improvements This full square footage intensity may be used for development in Sub -Area B. 3. See partial Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreement recorded on 02/05/2004 as Instrument No. 2004000089554 in official records Orange County. Land Use Compatibility/Integration The Segerstrom farmhouse provides a unique opportunity for preservation of a small piece of the City's agricultural heritage. This two-story home and accompanying barn are familiar sights n the area and stand as a reminder of the farming community that was evident here in the early 1900's. Although the Segerstrom home and barn are designated as Commercial Center on the General Plan Land use Map, it would be in keeping with Policy HCR -1 A.5 of the General Plan to preserve these historical structures. Preservation of these structures in their current location has been accomplished by land use recorded restrictions which include provisions for the long-term preservation of these buildings as historical resources. The property covered by the recorded restrictions is a 1.5acre site shown in Exhibit 11a and includes the home, barn, and two related structures. The boundaries of the property may be modified, as approved by the City's Development Services Director, so long as the site continues to include 1.5 acres and all four historic structures. The barn may be relocated within the site. Ownership of the property could remain with the Segerstrom family until such time they wished to transfer the property. At that time. the City, another public agency, or private owner could acquire the site subject to the recorded restrictions for preservation of this valuable community resource. The retention of the farmhouse results in a site design consideration. Non-residential buildings should be set back from the farmhouse site so as to not visually encroach into this area. Buffering could include walls/fencing, landscaping, and/or parking areas. Consideration should be given to physically linking the adjacent development to the farmhouse site with pedestrian paths. The development potential (square footage and trip budget) of the 1.5 -acre site has been transferred to the portion of the Home Ranch site located south of South Coast Drive and east of the Susan Street. Mesa Consolidated Water District at one time held a ground lease from the Segerestrom family for a small portion of the property in Sub -area B and had expressed an interest in acquiring the site. The Water District has since removed all of its facilities from the site, terminated the lease, and abandoned the site. This leaves this site available for development as a part of Sub -area B. Building Heights The General Plan specifically limits building heights to a maximum of five stories (and only in the project's center) for this site. Five stories approximate a 75 -foot height limitation. Exhibit 11b indicates the various height limits for Home Ranch. The actual siting of future buildings shall take into account surrounding development in order to minimize visual impacts. The use of low- reflective materials for the building's exteriors will minimize glare impacts. In Building Height Area 1 adjacent to Fairview Road, the City of Costa Mesa shall also require a shade/shadow analysis for any building proposed to exceed 30 feet in height in order to ensure that building's shade or shadow does not extend beyond the project site or public rights- of-way. Circulation The primary project access/egress points should be aligned with Susan Street and the existing Automobile Club entry to the north. Access to the farmhouse preservation site should be considered from within this area so as to minimize the number of driveways on South Coast Drive. Freeway access improvements in the immediate area include the widening of the Fairview Road off -ramps, both northbound and southbound, and the construction of the new South Coast Drive off -ramp. Both are completed. Final Program Environmental Impact Report No. 1048 for Home Ranch included a preliminary analysis of a Susan Street exit from the new South Coast Drive -Fairview Road- Harbor Boulevard collector road included in the 1-405/SR-73 confluence project. Prior to approval of this additional exit by CalTrans, additional environmental documentation would be required. The Susan Street exit is not required for the Home Ranch project. A future bikeway was shown on the Master Plan of Bikeways traversing this ske to South Coast Drive from the 1-405 bikeway undercrossing. However, in conjunction with GP -00- 05, this bike trail undercrossing and relatd linkages were deleted from the Master Plan of Bikeways. This deletion was necessitated by the CalTrans/FHWAfreeway improvements in the general area. Parks and Recreation The Segerstrom family house and barn may also be considered as meeting a portion of the future park needs for any future residential development north of South Coast Drive. It would not meet any active recreational needs, but serve rather as a cultural/historical center. In conjunction with GP -00-05, the historical reservation area was established. See previous band Use Compatibility/ Integration discussion. Fire Protection Services Future development plans and environmental analyses for this site need to assess the future fire station in the North Harbor area; i.e.; location and timing of construction. In conjunction with adoption of GP -00-05, it was determined that Segerstrom Home Ranch (Area 1) increased the demand for City fire suppression services in the City's northwest area. The Segerstrom Home Ranch development agreement includes provisions for the necessary land acquisition, building design, and construction costs. The City of Costa Mesa Fire Department is responsible for determining the timing of land acquisition and fire station construction. If the fire station is ultimately located on Segerstrom Home Ranch, the development agreement allows for transfer of development rights (building square footage and trip budget) to the balance of the Home Ranch project. The Wyndham Hotel Site: In 2007, Specific Plan Amendment (SP -07-01) was approved for the 3 -acre site. The Specific Plan Amendment includes a development option that would allow a mixed-use development consisting of a 200 -room boutique hotel and 120 -unit high-rise building with approximately 1,740 sq.ft, of retail space and 3,450 sq ft. for a bar/lounge. This would result in a maximum nonresidential floor area ratio (FAR)with a maximum 120 dwelling units. Development Maximum Maximum Allowable Maximum Allowable Option No. of Hotel Non -Residential FAR Number of High -Rise Rooms Residential Units Option 1 200 rooms 2.12 FAR 120 units Option 2 388 rooms 2.29 FAR -0- The Specific Plan allows development flexibility with regard to the overall mix of hotel rooms and residential units. This is subject to compliance with the following conditions through the final master plan review process: The applicant can demonstrate traffic -generation characteristics comparable to Option 1. For mixed use, development may be allowed up to a combined maximum of 320 hotel rooms/dwelling units, provided that the maximum number of hotel rooms in the mixed-use development does not exceed 200 rooms. The maximum FAR may be increased to no greater than 2.12 FAR in direct relation to the reduction of the residential densityfrom and 44 du/acre and 2.29 FAR for hotel development; The maximum allowable number of high-rise residential units may be increased to no greater than 132 units (44 du/acre) in direct relation to the reduction of the nonresidential FARfrom 2.12 FAR. The 238 existing hotel rooms may be reduced to allow additional residential units. As shown above, if the property owner decides not to develop the high-rise residential option and voluntarily demolishes the hotel instead, the maximum allowable nonresidential square footage would remain at 2.08 FAR with a redevelopment potential of 60,000 sq:ft. AREA 8- SAKIOKA LOT 2 Existing Land Uses This 33- acre area is designated for planned development, including mixed-use, residential, and commercial office development and is currently in agricultural production. Two single family homes are located along Sunflower Avenue. Lot 2 is owned by Roy K. Sakioka & Sons. General PlanandZoning This site is designated Urban Center Commercial by the General Plan and is zoned PDC. Development Standards and Trip Budget The development intensity for planned development (i.e. master plans) on Sakioka Lot 2 is limited by the following: The trip budget for this site is 1,062 a.m. peak hour trips and 1,407 p.m. peak hour trips. The trip budget shall not be exceeded for the aggregate development on Sakioka Lot 2. - Punned Development Standards of the PDC zone are applicable to the site, unless otherwise indicated in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. A maximum 1.0 Floor -Area -Ratio applies to nonresidential development. Nonresidential development is also subject to the trip budget limitation, applicable development standards of the PDC zone, and consistency with the General Plan. The maximum residential density (dwelling units per acre) is 28 dwelling units per acre for the residential component of a mixed-use development on a single legal parcel (See "Mixed -Use" discussion) or a maximum of 80 dwelling units per acre for an independent residential development that incorporates affordable housing (See "Affordable Housing ! Density Bonus discussion). An independent residential development is defined as a development in which a separate legal parcel (or parcels) is entirely developed as a residential use and therefore does not include commercial uses on the same legal parcel. The maximum building height of 8 stories per Airport Land Use Determination dated May 26, 2016 and as reflected in 2015-2035 General Plan. The projected trip generation for land uses proposed for Sakioka Lot 2 will be based on latest edition of Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers. The methodology will consider reasonable allowances for trip credits due to internal capture and pass -by trips. Internal capture credit refers to trips for various uses proposed within the parcel that can be accomplished without having to leave the facility. For example, an office complex could have restaurants and other ancillary uses which may not generate new trips — rather serve tenants within the complex. Other examples include conference room and fitness facilities. Pass -by trips refers to trips that are already on roadway adjacent to the development and use the facilities. Pass -by trip credits are limited to retail uses. The credits allowed for internal capture and pass -by trips will be determined by the Transportation Services Manager. The net trip generation after credits will be compared to the trip budget to determine if the proposed development is within the limits prescribed in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. Land Use Compatibility/integration Future development of this site is anticipated to include mid- and high-rise office buildings as well as support commercial. Shade and shadow impacts for buildings in excess of 2 stories should be considered in relation to surrounding land uses. Site design should limit vehicular access to and from Sunflower Avenue. New commercial and office buildings are encouraged to be located along the Anton frontage. Encroachment into the building setback on Anton Boulevard for commercial or mixed-use developments can be considered based on how well the project design accommodates pedestrians and if the parking areas and/or structures are located behind the commercial or mixed-use building(s). Parking areas shall not be allowed to encroach into the street setback, unless they are tucked under the commercial development. Parking lots/structures should be located primarily along the eastern edge of the site adjacent to the Costa Mesa Freeway and the new on-ramp. Internal pedestrian linkages to Anton Boulevard should be provided. Mixed -Use The PDC zoning does permit mixed-use development including residential and nonresidential uses as complementary uses. The residential component of a mixed-use development shall be limited to a maximum density of 28 dwelling units per acre. This maximum density only applies to residential uses as complementary uses to commercial uses within a mixed-use development. It does not apply to an independent residential development that does not include commercial uses on the same legal parcel. Total building intensity for the entire 33 -acre site shall not exceed the maximum allowable development intensity as set forth by the trip budgets., the overall mix of uses; including trips from dwelling units, shall be counted together in determining compliance with the trip budgets. The trip budget shall not be exceeded. The Costa Mesa Freeway, Sunflower Avenue, and Main Street represent significant air quality and noise sources that will impact the siting of residential units and other sensitive land uses. Existing ambient air quality may exceed state and federal levels for carbon monoxide;: therefore, significant mitigation measures may be required. Acceptable interior and exterior noise levels for residential uses would need to be achieved. An appropriate interface between the office buildings and residential uses would also be required. Affordable Housing and Density Bonus If all or a portion of the site is developed as an independent residential development that incorporates affordable housing, the maximum density shall be 80 dwelling units per acre involving a maximum number of 660 residential units (including any density bonuses, see Table 8. Total building intensity for the entire 33-acresite shall not exceed the maximum allowable development intensity as set forth by the trip budgets. The maximum number of dwelling units (including any density bonuses) for Sakioka Lot 2 is 660 units. The maximum base density is 528; in order to be granted a 25% density bonus (132 dwelling units), the developer would have to provide affordable housing pursuant to one of the following three options shown in the following table. All affordable housing provisions shall be for a minimum of 30 years. Table 8- Sakloka Lot 2 Density Bonus Program North Costa Mesa Specific Plan MAXIMUM BASE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CATEGORY' DENSITY BONUS DENSITY CRITERIA REQUIRED OPTION 1 PERCENT OF BASE 10% DENSITY TO BE VERY LOW INCOME' AFFORDABLE # OFAFFORDA BLE UNITS 53 UNITS 528 UNITS OPTION2 REQUIRED 20% LOW PERCENTOF BASE DENSITY TO BE INCOME AFFORDABLE # OFAFFORDABLE UNITS 106 UNITS OPTION 3 REQUIRED 10% LOW & 15% MODERATE LOW & MODERATE PERCENT OF BASE INCOME' DENSITY TO BE AFFORDABLE #OF AFFORDABLE UNITS 132 UNITS 25% DENSITY BONUS 132UNITS TOTAL UNITS2 660 NOTES: 7. Very Low, Low, and Moderate determinations are based on HUD definitions and income Omits, adjusted for family size. 2. The total number of units assumes that other criteria of the Planned Development Commercial Zone have been met regarding density increases. Density Bonus as provided herein, or as otherwise provided for by state law (Government Code 65915) *The maximum number of units (660) in an independent residential community is based on 8.25 acres of land and 80 unts per acre. Building Heights The maximum building height is 120 feet (approximately 8 stories) south of the new collector street and 60 feet (approximately 4 stories) north of the new collector street. Commercial or mixed use developments that are allowed to encroach into the street setback of Anton Boulevard shall be limited to 2 stories/ 30 feet within the street setback. Buildings above 161 AMSL feet in height will require approval by the FAA. Circulation The Master Plan of Highways includes a new collector street that connects Main Street and Anton Boulevard through this site. A new 1-405 on-ramp from Anton Boulevard is to the south of this site. The Master Plan of Bikeways includes a new bikeway on Sunflower Avenue. Figure 19 provides an overview of the entire plan area and depicts development standards that can be shown graphically. It should be noted that the information is intended to be illustrative and is not to be interpreted as the precise locations for future land uses or structures, or the collector street. Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 (SCH No. 2007011125) Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Prepared for City of Costa Mesa Development Services Department, Planning Division 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, California 92628 Prepared by BonTerra Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707-8794 T: 714.751.7373 August 2016 s Balancing the Natural and Built Environment www.Pscmas_cam Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section 1.0 Purpose of Addendum...........................................................................................1 Section 2.0 Project Background................................................................................................5 2.1 Boutique Hotel/High Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 1054...........................................................5 2.2 2015 Addendum to the Boutique Hotel/High Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report 1054........................................................................................................... 5 2.3 The Lakes - Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement................................................................................................. 5 Section 3.0 Project Description and Setting............................................................................7 3.1 Project Location......................................................................................... 7 3.2 Project Setting........................................................................................... 7 3.3 Project Description.....................................................................................8 3.4 Comparison to Previously Approved Project...........................................10 Section 4.0 Environmental Analysis.......................................................................................13 4.1 Aesthetics................................................................................................13 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources........................................................16 4.3 Air Quality................................................................................................17 4.4 Aviation Safety.........................................................................................26 4.5 Biological Resources............................................................................... 29 4.6 Cultural/Scientific Resources...................................................................30 4.7 Geology and Soils....................................................................................32 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.................................................................... 35 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials..........................................................41 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality...................................................................44 4.11 Land Use and Planning...........................................................................48 4.12 Mineral Resources...................................................................................52 4.13 Noise....................................................................................................... 53 4.14 Population and Housing...........................................................................60 4.15 Public Services........................................................................................ 62 4.16 Recreation............................................................................................... 67 4.17 Transportation and Traffic........................................................................68 4.18 Utilities and Service Systems.................................................................. 71 Section5.0 Conclusions..........................................................................................................79 Section6.0 References............................................................................................................81 R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx i Table of Contents Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Land Use Comparison....................................................................................................10 2 FAR Calculations............................................................................................................11 3 Designations of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin....................................19 4 Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (Pounds/day)..................................20 5 Local Significance Threshold Construction Emissions....................................................21 6 Peak Daily Operational Emissions..................................................................................22 7 Comparison of Worldwide Greenhouse Gas Emissions.................................................37 8 Estimated Annual GreenHouse Gas Emissions for Final Environmental Impact Report 1054 Project Addition..........................................................................................39 9 Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions for the Proposed Project ....................... 39 10 Trip Generation Summary...............................................................................................69 EXHIBITS Exhibit Follows Page 1 Local and Regional Vicinity...............................................................................................7 2 Aerial Photograph.............................................................................................................7 3 Technical Site Plan...........................................................................................................8 4 Vehicular Circulation Plan.................................................................................................8 5a—d Elevations........................................................................................................................14 6 Shadow Study.................................................................................................................15 7 Current (2013) Aircraft Noise Contours for John Wayne Airport.....................................58 8 Projected Future (2026-2030) Aircraft Noise Contours for John Wayne Airport .............58 LIST OF APPENDICES A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program B Air Quality Calculations C EDR Report D Trip Generation Analysis/Queueing Analysis R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx II Table of Contents Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 SECTION 1.0 PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM The Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential project was evaluated in The Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project (EIR [Environmental Impact Report]) No. 1054 (hereinafter referred to as "FEIR 1054"). FEIR 1054 was certified by the Costa Mesa City Council on November 20, 2007. FEIR 1054 analyzed the reuse of the project site as a mixed-use development with both hotel and residential uses (hereinafter referred to as "previously approved project"). As part of the previously approved project, the former Wyndham Hotel was proposed to be renovated to reduce the number of rooms from 238 to 200. Additionally, a 23 -story, 120 -unit high-rise residential tower was proposed to be constructed adjacent to the hotel, following demolition of the hotel's parking structure. As part of the previously approved project, it was determined that the overall mix of hotel rooms and residential units may be modified but could not exceed an overall total of 320 hotel rooms/dwelling units. In April 2015, the project (under new ownership and now known as Starwood Tribute Hotel) was modified to retain the 238 -room hotel and construct a 23 -story, 100 -unit high-rise residential tower adjacent to the hotel. This modified project was evaluated in the 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project FEIR No. 1054 (hereinafter referred to as "2015 Addendum"). Since certification of FEIR 1054 and subsequent approval of the 2015 Addendum, neither of the previously approved projects have been implemented and a newly modified project is now being proposed ("proposed project"). The proposed project would retain the existing 238 - room hotel and proposes to construct a new 15 -story, 150 -room high-rise hotel tower to serve as an expansion of the Avenue of the Arts Hotel (238 rooms existing, 388 rooms proposed). The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) allows for the preparation of an Addendum to a certified EIR to document minor technical changes in the project characteristics or environmental conditions under which the project will be developed. This Addendum to FEIR 1054 has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of CEQA (California Public Resources Code, Sections 21000 et seq.); the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000 et seq.); and the rules, regulations, and procedures for implementing CEQA as adopted by the City of Costa Mesa (City). Section 15164(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that "the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred". Section 21166 (Subsequent or Supplemental Impact Report; Conditions) of CEQA, and Section 15162(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines address when a subsequent EIR is required. As stated in Section 15162(a), a subsequent EIR is required when: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 1 Purpose of Addendum Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The purpose of this Addendum is to analyze the impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed project (including impacts resulting from changes in circumstances) and to identify the difference, if any, between the impacts evaluated with the previously approved projects and those that would be associated with the proposed project. It also reviews whether any new information of substantial importance has been identified that shows that the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous environmental documents. In 2007, Specific Plan Amendment (SP -07-01) to the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan was approved for the three -acre project site and included a development option that would allow a mixed-use development consisting of a 200 -room boutique hotel and 120 -unit high-rise building. An additional amendment is currently proposed to allow for a second development option that would allow for a hotel development consisting of 388 rooms with a maximum non-residential floor area ratio of 2.29 FAR. For purposes of this Addendum, although the proposed project represents an overall increase in the total number of hotel rooms and residential units from what was previously analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the proposed project involves a different mix of products (all hotel rooms versus previously approved mixes of hotel and residential units) and this addendum demonstrates that impacts would be similar to or less than what was previously analyzed for the project site in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. This Addendum also encompasses any and all future subsequent approvals for development of the proposed project on the project site. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Costa Mesa is the lead agency for the proposed project. The lead agency is the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. The City, as the lead agency, has the authority for project approval and certification of the accompanying environmental documentation. In accordance with Section 21166 of CEQA and Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, based on the analysis presented in this document, the City of Costa Mesa has determined there are no new significant impacts resulting from the proposed project, nor is there any substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified environmental impacts. In addition, the changes with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project will be undertaken would not result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. The potential impacts associated with the proposed project would either be the same or less than the anticipated levels described in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. An Addendum is the appropriate environmental documentation for the proposed project and requested approvals. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 2 Purpose of Addendum Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Section 2.0 of this Addendum provides background information on the previously approved project, including actions taken by the City Council. Section 3.0 provides a description of the proposed project. Section 4.0 presents an environmental analysis of the proposed project. Appendix A, the Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, identifies the Project Design Features, Standard Conditions of Approval, and Mitigation Measures that are applicable to the project. Section 5.0 presents the findings related to the environmental analysis of the proposed project. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 3 Purpose of Addendum Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 This page intentionally left blank R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 4 Purpose of Addendum Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 SECTION 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND The proposed project would be implemented on the site of the existing Avenue of the Arts Hotel in the City of Costa Mesa (City). The site has been subject to previous planning efforts. The following section provides a summary of the planning efforts that are integral to the proposed project. 2.1 BOUTIQUE HOTEL/HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 1054 In 2007, FEIR 1054 was prepared to address the reuse of the project site as a mixed-use development with both hotel and residential uses. As part of the previously approved project, the Avenue of the Arts Hotel was proposed to be renovated to reduce the number of rooms from 238 to 200 and to add an approximate 4,735 -square -foot (sf) spa on the hotel's first floor. The 2,775-sf hotel restaurant would also be remodeled as part of the previously approved project. These proposed modifications would not change the hotel's overall square footage. Additionally, a 23 -story, 120 -unit high-rise residential tower was proposed to be constructed adjacent to the hotel, following demolition of the hotel's parking structure, and would include approximately 3,450 sf of lounge/bar space and 1,740 sf of ancillary retail space. A new 7.5 -level, 480 -space parking structure was also proposed to be constructed east of the proposed residential tower, which would serve both the residential tower and the hotel. Based on existing entitlements and according to the analysis presented in FEIR 1054, it was determined that the overall mix of hotel rooms and residential units may be modified but could not exceed an overall total of 320 hotel rooms/dwelling units. The Costa Mesa City Council certified FEIR 1054 in November 2007. The previously approved project required amendments to the City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan and the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan to allow for a combination of a boutique hotel and high- rise residential development on the site at a site-specific density of 44 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) for the proposed residential uses. 2.2 2015 ADDENDUM TO THE BOUTIQUE HOTEL/HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 1054 In 2015, an Addendum to FEIR 1054 was prepared to evaluate an amended project involving retention of the existing 238 -room hotel and construction of a 23 -level residential high-rise tower. The proposed project involved demolition of the hotel parking garage and construction of a 100 -unit condominium tower adjacent to a new, proposed 7.5 -level parking garage consisting of 1 subterranean level and 6.5 levels above ground. The residential tower would be constructed adjacent to the existing 238 -unit Wyndham Hotel. The luxury residential tower would have 100 for - sale condominium units on the 2nd through 23rd stories, including 9 one -bedroom units, 75 two- bedroom units, and 16 three-bedroom units. This project represented a modification to the approved development plan, and it was determined that, when compared to the previously certified FEIR 1054, no impacts would occur nor would there be any substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified effects. The City of Costa Mesa approved the project in April 2015. 2.3 THE LAKES — COSTA MESA ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT As part of an agreement between The Lakes — Costa Mesa Association and the adjacent property owners (Legacy, Marriott, and Wyndham), restrictions and requirements were set forth related to construction activities and are incorporated into the proposed project. Specifically, The Lakes — Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement requires the Project Applicant to do the following: R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 5 Project Background Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 • To provide reports discussing the geotechnical impacts related to construction on the project site. • To provide the anticipated timing when common areas would be impacted by construction and therefore would be unavailable for use by Association parties. • To provide decorative screening of construction areas that directly face adjacent properties. • To limit hours of construction operation beyond the requirements set forth in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan (refer to Section 4.13.2 for a table of noise restrictions). To comply with the Mitigation Agreement during construction activities related to restroom location, parking restrictions, lighting restrictions, construction -related trash bins, and notification of traffic alteration and a requirement to maintain access to adjacent properties. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 6 Project Background Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SETTING 3.1 PROJECT LOCATION The Starwood Tribute Hotel project site (proposed project), currently referred to as the Avenue of the Arts Hotel, is located at 3350 Avenue of the Arts in the City of Costa Mesa. The three -acre project site is bound to the west by Avenue of the Arts, the Plaza Tower, and a vacant parcel approved for development as the Orange County Museum of Art; to the north and northeast by the 3400 Avenue of the Arts apartment community; and to the south and southeast by 580 Anton Boulevard (currently under construction). The Marriott Hotel is southeast of the project site. The project site is within Area 5 of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan area is generally bound to the north by Sunflower Avenue, to the south by Interstate (1) 405, to the east by Sakioka Drive, and to the west by Bristol Street. Area 5 is 27 acres and contains 2 hotels (Avenue of the Arts and Marriott Hotel with a total of 492 rooms), 3400 Avenue of the Arts apartment community (770 units), and recently demolished The Lakes Pavilions retail/restaurant center (21,349 sf) which is being replaced by 250 -apartment units. The project site is located in a nearly built -out area of the City. 3.2 PROJECT SETTING The project site is located in a highly developed and urbanized area of the City of Costa Mesa, east of South Coast Plaza. The three -acre project site is currently developed with the Avenue of the Arts Hotel and its associated three-level parking structure. The hotel is a 6 -story structure with 238 hotel rooms, meeting facilities, and a restaurant. The hotel's 85,000-sf parking structure is located directly north of the hotel. It has 3 levels with 240 parking spaces. There are 24 surface spaces for employees at the rear of the building. The site is relatively flat with no notable elevation changes. Development in the area is varied and includes commercial, residential, office, and community uses. Exhibit 1, Local and Regional Vicinity, depicts the project site in a regional and local context. As shown on Exhibit 2, Aerial Photograph, typical development in the project area includes South Coast Plaza; several multi -story office buildings and hotels, including Plaza Tower and Center Tower high-rise office buildings (274 feet above grade level [AGL] and 283 feet AGL; respectively); cultural arts venues, including the Orange County Performing Arts Center, the South Coast Repertory, and the Renee and Henry Segerstrom Concert Hall; and high-density residential uses located north and east of the site. A variety of commercial and retail uses are found at the intersection of Bristol Street and Sunflower Avenue. The Enclave Apartment community is located at the northeast corner of Anton Boulevard and Sakioka Drive. 1-405 is south of the site with single-family residences, retail uses, and mid -rise office buildings and hotels south of 1-405. In addition to these existing urban uses, five separate high-rise residential building projects were approved for development in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area. They are the Segerstrom Town Center, the Orange County Museum of Art, 580 Anton Boulevard, the Symphony Towers, and the Pacific Arts Plaza. The project site is designated High Density Residential in the City of Costa Mesa's 2015-2035 General Plan. The site is located in the Planned Development Residential—High Density (PDR - HD) zone as set forth in the Zoning Code. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 7 Project Description and Setting J� _Warner Ave_ Jefferson t1i cFadden Elementary Sc chool Carl Thornton Park Segerstrom Ave Greenville Fundamental School MacArthur Blvd Gnset Park 0 m Wakeham Parlr Paulanno Park ;I — EdCosta Farm IF William H Taft Elementary School N i m Sunflower Ave Fashion Institute of Design i National Guard PIP7 �.! Presidio School Tewinkle Memorial Park 5 7 Santa Ana Country Club C, 43, Webster University Local and Regional Vicinity Exhibit 1 Starwood Tribute Hotel Project w—�—PSOMAS E 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 5 Feet (Rev: 7-19-2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Graphics\Addendum\ex1_RL_LV_20160719.pdf l IWest Covina Los Angeles Whittier Cso� Coastal Communiti6 Hospital (:77j)J Downey - _--- ---- - I U ®i -� X90 Saddleback 91 C57� High School Lakewood L,9 Buena Park Anaheim Carson MacA Long Beach • ' Westminster �� 6 Project Site Huntington Costa Mesa o Beach Irvine IF William H Taft Elementary School N i m Sunflower Ave Fashion Institute of Design i National Guard PIP7 �.! Presidio School Tewinkle Memorial Park 5 7 Santa Ana Country Club C, 43, Webster University Local and Regional Vicinity Exhibit 1 Starwood Tribute Hotel Project w—�—PSOMAS E 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 5 Feet (Rev: 7-19-2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Graphics\Addendum\ex1_RL_LV_20160719.pdf Segerstrom Center for the Arts Plaza Tower Aerial Photograph Starwood Tribute Hotel Project N E 60 30 0 60 Feet s 3400 Avenue of the Arts Apartments w Q X — —� o PRIVATE DRIVEWAY 1`y N15 5 LEVEL _ LEVEL .=,jar GARAGE HOTEL Fd F c..F5 do _ C 10 'pT z 7EXTERIOR%COURTYAR D z CD 1 GLASS ROOF OVER PAVILION.' c� /0 J EXISTING HOTEL TO REMAIN m I PROPERTY LINE cL t o� Retail LAKE 3400 Avenue of the Arts Apartments Costa Mesa Marriott Source: Arquitectonica 201 E Exhibit 2 PSOMAS (08/09/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Graphics\Addendum\ex2_Aerial _20160809.pdf Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 3.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project would involve the demolition of the existing Avenue of the Arts Hotel parking garage and construction of a 15 -story, 150 -room high-rise hotel tower adjacent to a new, proposed 6 -level parking garage. The hotel tower would be constructed adjacent to the existing 238 -unit Avenue of the Arts Hotel, which would be retained as part of the proposed project, as shown on Exhibit 3, Technical Site Plan. 3.3.1 HIGH-RISE HOTEL TOWER The existing parking structure for the hotel would be demolished. In its place, a 15 -story high-rise hotel tower would be constructed along Avenue of the Arts. The high-rise hotel tower would not exceed 220 feet in height AGL (approximately 254 feet above mean sea level [msl]). The hotel tower would provide 150 guest rooms. Additional hotel amenities include a restaurant and lounge area, ballroom, meeting rooms, fitness center, and an outdoor pool and spa with amenity deck. 3.3.2 PARKING The existing 3 -level 240 -space Avenue of the Arts Hotel parking structure would be demolished. A new 6 -level (5 levels above ground and 1 level below ground), 340 -space parking structure would be constructed east of the new hotel tower. Direct application of the Notch Costa Mesa Specific Plan parking ratios would result in a City parking requirement of 451 parking spaces, which indicates a theoretical parking deficiency of 111 parking spaces based on the proposed on-site parking supply of 340 parking spaces. There is an opportunity to share parking spaces based on the utilization profile of each of the land use components. The previous entitlements also applied this same shared parking ratio. By applying this shared parking ratio, a total of 274 spaces would be required. The Shared Parking Demand Analysis prepared for the proposed project indicates that the proposed on-site parking supply of 340 spaces would result in adequate weekday and weekend parking based on the theoretical peak parking demand for the proposed project (274 spaces). 3.3.3 ACCESS/CIRCULATION Visitors of the hotel would have an option to valet their vehicle or self -park. Those accessing the self -park facility would continue on Avenue of the Arts, past the hotel driveway; they would turn right at the traffic circle and access the parking structure entry in rear of the hotel, as shown on Exhibit 4, Vehicular Circulation Plan. Those who utilize the valet service would use the hotel's main driveway from Avenue of the Arts. As part of the proposed project, the existing hotel lobby would be removed to provide a looped vehicular driveway to accommodate vehicle queuing for up to 12 cars to drop-off and check in. A ramp up from the garage to the driveway would provide on-site access for valet drop-off capabilities without requiring the valet to access the public street, Avenue of the Arts. The existing driveway to the north, accessing the north adjacent property and new parking garage, would remain in place. The drop-off area includes a covered open air breezeway and second level pedestrian bridge (1,920 sf) that would allow for pedestrian circulation between the new and existing hotel. An enclosed glass pavilion would be located immediately east of the breezeway and would open up to the exterior landscaped courtyard. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 8 Project Description and Setting Technical Site Plan Starwood Tribute Hotel Project N N E 32 16 0 32 s Feet Source: Arquitectonica 2016 Exhibit 3 PSOMAS (08/09/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Graphics\Addendum\ex3_TechSitePlan_20160809.pdf ' 0000••••••• '0 ••• •.0 • 0 • • • • • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SECOND -STORY WINDOWS - • GUEST OUTBOUND • 0000.•=•...•••0••••A•••••••000000••••••0=•. FIRE TRUCK LANE ---------------r----------�- �•- EXTERIOR COURTYARD SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS LEGEND = � � = GUEST INBOUND •000.0•• GUEST OUTBOUND ---� VALET ROUTE TO PARKING VALET CAR RETURN FIRE LANE LOADING NEW OR EXISTING LOADING o I Source: Arquitectonica 2016 Vehicular Circulation Plan Starwood Tribute Hotel Project N N E 32 16 0 32 Feet s Exhibit 4 PSOMAS (07/19/2016 JAZ) RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Graphics\Addendum\ex4_VehicularCirculationPlan_20160719.pdf Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 3.3.4 LANDSCAPE/HARDSCAPE PLAN Landscaping and decorative hardscape elements would be primarily provided along the proposed hotel tower frontage along Avenue of the Arts. The areas nearest the public sidewalk would be planted with shrubs and groundcover with low -growing species at a pedestrian scale. Palms with an understory of Palo Verde trees would also be planted along the sidewalk to blend with the existing roadway median. Various specimen trees would be planted along the exterior landscaped courtyard. The hotel would also include a garden area located adjacent to the proposed parking structure. 3.3.5 TEMPORARY PARKING PLAN During project construction, access to the parking garage would be restricted for an approximately 23 month period. Hotel and restaurant guests and employees would be required to park in one or a combination of multiple temporary parking areas. Based on an anticipated occupancy rate of 40 percent, or approximately 95 rooms per night, total parking demand during construction would be 43 parking spaces to accommodate both guest and employee parking, or a need for approximately 15,050 sf of parking area. Five possible off-site parking locations have been identified; 3 of the sites are within 0.2 mile of the hotel and the other 2 sites are within 1.2 miles of the hotel. With the exception of one site known as the Sakioka land, which is currently in agricultural production, all sites exist as parking areas and would not require modifications or upgrades to accommodate the temporary parking demand of the project. The Sakioka land would require construction of a paved surface lot, the development of which is not included as part of the proposed project and would require separate environmental review. Access to and from the temporary parking area(s) would be provided via hotel shuttles, which would be available to transport up to 24 people at a time throughout the day. 3.3.6 CONSTRUCTION Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to start in October 2017 with demolition of the existing parking garage. Demolition would require an estimated 490 haul truck round trips over a period of 10 weeks, which is approximately 10 round trips per day. Demolition would be followed by grading and excavation for the parking garage, followed by construction of the parking garage. Excavation for the subterranean levels of the garage would require approximately 1,694 truckloads of soil to be exported from the site and excavation for the foundation and subterranean level of the hotel tower would require approximately 242 truckloads of soil to be exported from the site. Once the parking garage is complete, it would be open to public use for hotel and restaurant patrons. Upon completion of the parking garage, construction would proceed on the hotel tower, with completion of the tower estimated for April 2019. 3.3.7 REQUESTED PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS As part of the proposed project, the Project Applicant is requesting approval of the following entitlements: 1) Master Plan Amendment for the Starwood Tribute Hotel project. The proposed amendment involves the following revised components: Amend the proposed hotel room count from a 238 -room hotel to a 388 -room hotel to reflect retention of all of the rooms of the existing hotel as well as construction of a new 150 -room tower. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 9 Project Description and Setting Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 The other unchanged components of the Master Plan are detailed in Table 1, Land Use Comparison, below. 3.4 COMPARISON TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT As discussed previously, the Project Applicant is proposing to retain the hotel in place with the existing 238 -room count; to construct a new 15 -story, 150 -room high-rise hotel tower; and to construct a 1,823 sf bar/lounge and 332 sf of ancillary retail space. Table 1, Land Use Comparison, presents a comparison of the previously approved project evaluated in FEIR 1054, the 2015 Addendum, and the proposed project. Table 2, presents floor area ratio (FAR) calculations for the existing and proposed hotel. TABLE 1 LAND USE COMPARISON Land Use FOR 1054 2015 Addendum Proposed Project Hotel Hotel Rooms 200 rooms 238a rooms 388 roomsb Lounge/Bar Area 3,450 sf 0 sf 1,823 sf Ancillary Retail 1,740 sf 0 sf 332 sf High -Rise Residential/Hotel Units 120 du 100 du 0 du Area 292,172 sf 291,542 sf 283,886 sf Stories/Height (feet above ms]) 23 stories/270 ft from grade 23 stories/270 ft from 15 stories/220 ft from (304 ft above msl) grade (304 ft above msl) grade (254 ft above msl) Parking Garage Levels 7.5 levels (6 levels above ground and 1.5 level below ground) 7.5 levels (6 levels 6 levels (5 levels above above ground and 1.5 ground and 1 level level below ground) below ground) Spaces 480 spaces 422 spaces 340 spaces sf: square feet; du: dwelling unit; msl: above mean sea level a Existing hotel will be retained. b 150 hotel units are proposed in addition to the existing 238 hotel rooms on property. Total hotel units on property would be 388. Source: Arquitectonica 2016. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 10 Project Description and Setting Stanwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 TABLE 2 FAR CALCULATIONS Non -Residential Area (SF) Proposed Addition Area (SF)a Total Hotel Area Number of Hotel Rooms Total Lot Area Calculated Non - Retail Bar/Lounge New Hotel (SF)b (Existing & Proposed) (3 Acres)' Residential FAR d,e,f Existing Hotel - - - 152,000 238 130,683 1.16 Proposed Hotel 280 2,220 144,580 147,080 150 130,683 1.13 Total (Existing & Proposed) 280 2,220 144,580 299,080 388 130,683 2.29 FAR = Total Hotel Area (Existing and Proposed) Total Lot Area (3 Acres) a Market Plan/Gift Shop SF to be confirmed. b Approximate SF of existing hotel, excluding existing parking garage to be demolished. According to the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, Lot area = 3 Acres, which = 130,683 square feet. d Non -Residential FAR is the sum of non-residential use divided by total lot area. According to North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, Maximum Non -Residential FAR = 2.12. ` For calculating Non -Residential Area for the proposed 2016 hotel addition, total GSF of new hotel will be used, and added to Existing Hotel Area. Source: Arquitectonica 2016. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 11 Project Description and Setting Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 This page intentionally left blank R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 12 Project Description and Setting Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS This section of the Addendum examines each environmental topical issue analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum specific to the proposed project. The Addendum includes additional areas of analysis, including forestland resources and greenhouse gas emissions, pursuant to the 2010 amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines. The focus of this Addendum to FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum is to evaluate the potential for changes in the impacts as a result of modifications to the proposed site plan, which includes keeping the hotel's existing 238 rooms; to construct a new 15 -story, 150 -room high-rise hotel tower; and to construct a 1,823 sf bar/lounge and 332 sf of ancillary retail space. This evaluation includes a determination as to whether the changes proposed for the Starwood Tribute Hotel project would result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in a previously identified significant impact. The topical areas identified in the CEQA Environmental Checklist (Checklist) were used as guidance for this Addendum. For each section, brief summaries of the findings of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum are provided. This comparative analysis provides the City with the factual basis for determining if any changes in the project, any changes in circumstances, or any new information since FEIR 1054 was certified and the 2015 Addendum was approved require additional environmental review or preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. The mitigation program from FEIR 1054 applicable to the proposed project is contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) included in Appendix A; no new mitigation measures are proposed. 4.1 AESTHETICS 4.1.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 As set forth in the Initial Study prepared for FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, nor would it damage scenic resources. It was determined that the site is not designated as a scenic vista; is not located in a scenic preservation zone; and would not affect scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings near or within a State scenic highway. FEIR 1054 concluded that demolition and construction activities associated with the previously approved project would modify the site's aesthetics by removing existing landscaping; however, the previously approved project would introduce components of similar scale to the existing and approved uses of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area. As detailed in FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would introduce new sources of night lighting and glare; however, these impacts would be considered less than significant. Further, pursuant to The Lakes — Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement, construction lighting shall be placed in such a manner to minimize any lighting effects or glare on adjacent properties. As detailed in FEIR 1054, given the urban nature of the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area and its surrounding area, the eight approved high-rise residential towers in the Specific Plan area were not considered sensitive uses with the same expectations of shade/shadow limits as traditional single-family and low-rise multi -family residences. As such, the shade and shadow effects of existing and approved but not constructed buildings on the high-rise residential uses proposed as R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 13 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 part of the previously approved project were not considered significant given the urban context. Similarly, the shade and shadow effects of the previously approved but not constructed high-rise residential towers would also not be considered a significant effect. As discussed in FEIR 1054, during the summer months, the previously approved project would cast a shadow on properties located generally northwest, north, and northeast of the site, including a small portion of the Orange County Museum of Art site and 3400 Avenue of the Arts apartment community. However, the shadow would not impact a sensitive use (i.e., residential unit). During the winter months, the previously approved project would cast a shadow on properties located generally northwest, north, and northeast of the site, including the Orange County Performing Arts Center property and 3400 Avenue of the Arts apartment community. While shadow would not cast over the entirety of 3400 Avenue of the Arts apartment community, residential units would experience some degree of shading for five hours (i.e., between the hours of 10:00 AM and 3:00 PM). Therefore, the established threshold of significance would be exceeded and FEIR 1054 concluded that this impact would be considered significant and unavoidable. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Prosect Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 The visual analysis for the 2015 Addendum determined that implementation of the modified project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects with regards to visual resources. Seven standard conditions pertaining to aesthetics were anticipated to be applicable to the modified project. 4.1.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Consistent with the analysis presented in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the proposed project site and its surrounding area are located within a highly urbanized portion of the City that does not contain any designated scenic vistas or resources and is not visible from any State or local scenic highways. According to the California Scenic Highways Mapping System, the closest designated highway is State Route (SR) 1, which is an Eligible State Scenic Highway — Not Officially Designated and is located approximately six miles west of the project site (Caltrans 2016). As noted in FEIR 1054, the proposed project would not substantially alter the visual character of the site. Rather, it would continue the urban character of the site and surrounding areas through the construction of a new hotel tower; visual elements of the proposed tower would be consistent with surrounding development and the architecture would be similar to what was evaluated as part of the previously approved project (refer to Exhibits 5a through 5d, Elevations). Further, the addition of landscaping as described previously in Section 3.0, Project Description and Setting, would soften the appearance of the proposed building and would blend with the existing landscaping along Avenue of the Arts and the newly renovated Silver Trumpet restaurant. The proposed project would not involve any physical development beyond what was evaluated and approved in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Because the hotel tower would be constructed within the same footprint and would not exceed the building height analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact, nor would it create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to the degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Impacts to the visual character and quality of the proposed project site would not change beyond what was anticipated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Further, the proposed project would comply with The Lakes — Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement requirement that decorative screening be provided on the areas of construction that directly face adjacent properties. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 14 Environmental Analysis TOP OF PARAPET 193.50' P. _ ME0' LEVEL 16 / ROOF 165.00' Level l y_ 155.00' Level l4_ 145.00' Level 13— 135.00' Level 12— 125.00' Level ll 5.00'_ 11 Leve110_ 105.00' Level9 _ ss.00' Level8 — 85.00' Level 7 — 15.00' Level6 _ 65.00' Levels _ 55.00' Level4 _ 45.00' 30Level3 .00 _ ' LEVEL 2_ 15.00' LEVEL 1- 0.00' West Elevation Starwood Tribute Hotel Project 4 L F 6 Source: Arquitectonica 2016 Exhibit 5a PSOMAS (08/09/2016 JAZ) RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\GraphicsWddendum\ex5a_WestElevations_20160809.pdf TOP OF PARAPET — — 193.50' ROOF_ 184.17' — T.O.P._ 78.50' LEVEL I6/ROOF _ 165.00' Level l5 _ 155.00' Level 14 _ 145.00' - 4 Level 13 _ 135.00' 6 Level 12 _ 125.00' Leven. - _ 115.00' Leve110 _ 105.00' Level9 - _ 8 Leve1_ 85.00' Leve17 _ 75.00' Level6 _ 65.00' - .Le�ve15 V 55.00' Jk Leve0'l 4 Level3 _ 30.00' tO LEVEL 2 15.00' LEVEL 1 0.00' A GLASS CURTAINWALL CANOPY GLASS ENCLOSED PAVILION EXISTING HOTEL _Level P6 48.66' Level PS 39.50' Level P4 30.33' Level P3 AL - 1.1 Level P2 12.00' _Level 0.0; 1 0' o I Source: Arquitectonica 2016 South Elevation Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Exhibit 5b PSOMAS (08/09/2016 JAZ) RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\GraphicsWddendum\ex5b_SouthElevations_20160809.pdf 0 East Elevation Starwood Tribute Hotel Project ., ti "iia;14 Ilk 11-P,2.5 T Source: Arquitectonica 201 E Exhibit 5c PSOMAS (08/09/2016 JAZ) RAF`rojects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Graphics\Addendum\ex5c_EastElevations_20160809.pdf TOP OF PARAPET AL 79.0' — OLID PARAPET A3 MECHANICAL R00 I = I _ - ROO 81 T.O.P. - I 178.5-, _ _ — _ - _ _ _ LEVEL 161 ROOF 165.00' GLASS WINDOW WALL. q I _Lev e115 OIL 155.00' Level l4 145.00' BRISE SOLEIL, TYPICAL PAINTED META �� _- I____ _ Lev 113 oL 1135.00' Level 12 odL 125.00' Level 11 115.00' _ Level 10 7 15.00' Level 9 95.00' I Level BOL 85.00' _ I - L 7 —— — — — — — — — — — — — — e v e 75.00' . _ I ———— I —-- — — Level6 6 5.0 0' — — — — — — — — — I — Level 5 5500' PAINTED CONCRETE II PARKING GARAGE - - J— I ADJACENT- I APARTMENT 45 00' Level P5 — — — — - — — — — COMPLEX — — — — — 39.50' Level P4 30.33' � Level P3 OIL 21.17' Level P2 OIL 12.00' _ — _ Level P7 OIL 0.00' Source: Arquitectonica 201 E Exhibit 5c PSOMAS (08/09/2016 JAZ) RAF`rojects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Graphics\Addendum\ex5c_EastElevations_20160809.pdf Level P6 48.66' -01 Level P5 39.50' Level P4 30.33' Level P3 21.1T— Level P2 12.00' Level P1 0.00' 323/4" 24'-6" 24'-2" 24'-6" 30'-0" 30'-0" 284" 15'4" 8'-2" 22'4" 33'-6" 30'-0" 30'-0" 24'-111/2" PARKING GARAGE � DOOR ��u V�� "u North Elevation Starwood Tribute Hotel Project TOP OF ROOF 184.17' T.P. 178.50' _ LEVEL 161 ROOF 165.00' Level 15 ZD - 155.00' Level 14 . 145.00' Level 1 135.00' Le2 1 2 125.00' Level 11 JL 115.00' Lev 110 105.00' LMl 9 95.00' Level 85.00' _Level 75.00' Level . 65.00'6 Leve15 55.00' Level OL 45.00' Level3 30.00' _ _ LEVEL2 15.00' MAM Source: Arquitectonica 20 Exhibit 5d PSOMAS (08/09/2016 JAZ) RAProjects\COS_ CMk3COS010100\Graphics\Addendum\ex5d_NorthElevations_20160809.pdf Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 As shown on Exhibit 6, Shadow Study, prepared for the 2015 Addendum, a 270 -foot tower would exceed the City's established threshold by casting shade or shadow onto sensitive uses in adjacent off-site areas for more than two hours between 10:00 AM and 3:00 PM, resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact. As discussed in the 2015 Addendum, the apartment units located at 3400 Avenue of the Arts are considered to be a shade and shadow sensitive land use; however, the apartment community's tennis courts and open space areas are not considered shade and shadow sensitive uses. Because the proposed project includes construction of a tower that would be in the same location as, but shorter than, the tower evaluated in the 2015 Addendum (maximum height of 220 feet above ground level [AGL] compared to 270 feet AGL), impacts would be equivalent to or less than what was identified in the 2015 Addendum. Consistent with FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, this impact would be considered significant and unavoidable. Consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the proposed project would introduce new sources of night lighting and glare through the addition of a new hotel tower; however, the proposed project would be required to comply with the Standard Conditions identified in FEIR 1054 and restated below. Development in accordance with these requirements would reduce the impact of new light and glare sources to a level that is less than significant. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the aesthetics analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes standard conditions which, when complied with, ensure that potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project would occur at less than significant levels. The following Standard Conditions from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Standard Conditions The City of Costa Mesa imposes Standard Conditions of Approval (SCs) on all development projects. The following conditions are anticipated to be applicable to the proposed project and would act to minimize impacts, either partially or completely. The City may also determine that additional or modified conditions of approval are appropriate during detailed project review. SC 4.1-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit an Electrical Engineer's Photometric Survey to be approved by the Planning Division in order to assure that minimum security lighting requirements are met and to minimize light and glare to residents. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 15 Environmental Analysis December 21 Winter Solstice Shadow Study Starwood Tribute Hotel Project 4W March 21 / September 21 Equinox June 21 Summer Solstice Source: Arquitectonica 2014 Exhibit 6 PSO MAS (07/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Graphics\Addendum\ex6_ShadowStudy_20160719.pdf Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 SC 4.1-2 All exterior light standards and fixtures will be shielded to prevent light spill to further reduce potential impacts. SC 4.1-3 The intensity and location of lights on buildings shall be limited to minimize nighttime light and glare to residents and shall be subject to the Development Services Director's approval. SC 4.1-4 The Lighting Plan shall demonstrate compliance with the following: (1) All site lighting fixtures shall be provided with a flat glass lens; (2) Photometric calculations shall indicate the effect of the flat glass lens fixture efficiency; (3) Lighting design and layout shall limit spill light to no more than 0.5 foot-candle at the property line of the surrounding neighbors, consistent with the level of lighting that is determined necessary for safety and security purposes on site. SC 4.1-5 Architectural features and roofs shall be appropriately finished with non -reflective materials in order to reduce glare and reflection. Structures shall use low reflective glass and building materials to minimize daytime glare to the fullest extent possible. SC 4.1-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit building plans for the proposed project, to be approved by the Planning Division, which incorporate the use of non -reflective building materials to minimize light and glare impacts. SC 4.1-7 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit a Final Landscape Plan, consistent with the landscape standards, for each development component to be approved by the Planning Division. 4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES 4.2.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 FEIR 1054 did not address agriculture and forestry resources. As set forth in the Initial Study prepared for FEIR 1054, no areas designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance were identified within or near the previously approved project site, and it was determined that no impacts to agricultural resources including conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use or conflicts with a Williamson Act contract, would result from implementation of the previously approved project. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 The modified project evaluated in the 2015 Addendum to FEIR 1054 did not propose any substantial changes and did not create any significant impacts to agricultural resources. No major revisions to agricultural resources were required and the Addendum was found to be consistent with the modified project analyzed in FEIR 1054. 4.2.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Data from the State of California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program indicates that the proposed project site is currently designated "Urban and Built -Up R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 16 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Land" and contains no land that is designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance (FMMP 2012), nor is the proposed project site zoned for agricultural use. Since the proposed project site is in an urban area, no changes would result in converting farmland to non-agricultural uses. In addition, the proposed project site is not in agricultural use or under Williamson Act contracts. It should be noted that there is an area designated as Farmland of Statewide Importance located approximately 0.75 mile east of the proposed project site; however, this area would not be impacted by development of the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to agricultural resources. The proposed project site is not defined as forest land according to Section 12220(g) of the California Public Resources Code, which defines forest land as "land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits", nor is it zoned for Timberland Production as defined by Section 51104(g) of the California Government Code. Since the proposed project site is in an urban area, no changes would result from converting forest land to non -forest uses. Therefore, no new impacts related to forestry resources would occur. Although the forest land resources were not an environmental topic of concern when FEIR 1054 was prepared, there are no environmental impacts associated with this issue, and this does not preclude the use of an Addendum to the previous document. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the agriculture and forestry resources analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. 4.3 AIR QUALITY 4.3.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Wyndham Boutique HoteUHigh-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 FEIR 1054 identified that construction -related emissions associated with the previously approved project would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and reactive organic gases (ROG), resulting in a potential significant impact. The primary source of NOx emissions would be onroad haul trucks during the demolition phase. The primary source of ROG emissions would be architectural coating (painting) of the proposed 120 condominium units. Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would minimize construction emissions to the maximum extent feasible. However, even with mitigation, R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 17 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 short-term, construction -related emissions would exceed the thresholds, resulting in significant and unavoidable short-term impacts. No significant long-term operational impacts related to air quality were found to occur at the local and regional levels. FEIR 1054 concluded that the previously approved project would be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP); specifically, the previously approved project was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the previously approved project was included in the 2025 forecasted traffic volumes, including those for regional growth. The growth forecasts for the previously approved project were found to be consistent with the SCAG growth forecasts; therefore, the previously approved project was found to be consistent with the AQMP. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 The 2015 Addendum concluded that construction -related mass daily emissions generated by the modified project would be less than those anticipated in FEIR 1054 and would be below the SCAQMD thresholds of significance; therefore, the impact would be less than significant. Localized construction emissions impacts would be less than significant; these impacts were not analyzed in FEIR 1054. Construction emissions of nonattainment pollutants would not be cumulatively considerable and impacts would be less than significant, which is consistent with the finding in FEIR 1054 for cumulative impacts. Operational emissions generated by the modified project would be below the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance and the impact would be less than significant, consistent with the finding in FEIR 1054. The 2015 Addendum concluded that the project would be consistent with and would not conflict with the 2012 SCAQMD AQMP. It was assumed that the development planned in FEIR 1054 was used in the planning assumptions for the 2012 AQMP. The modified project would have fewer average daily trips (ADT) than anticipated in FEIR 1054, thereby concluding the project would not conflict with the AQMP. 4.3.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW One national ambient air quality standard (AAQS) has been revised since the certification of the 2015 Addendum (CARB 2016). The national 8 -hour standard for ozone (03) was reduced from 0.075 to 0.070 parts per million (ppm). The current national and State AAQS are provided in Appendix B. The SCAQMD 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (2012 AQMP) is the current air quality plan. On December 7, 2012, the SCAQMD adopted the 2012 AQMP, which was a regional and multi -agency effort, including SCAQMD, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The 2012 AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including the 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methods for various source categories, and SCAG's latest growth forecasts (SCAQMD 2013, SCAG 2012). On December 20, 2012, the 2012 AQMP was submitted to CARB and the USEPA for concurrent review and approval for inclusion in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) (SCAQMD 2013). The 2012 AQMP was approved by CARB on January 25, 2013 (CARB 2014a). R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 18 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 The SCAQMD published the Draft 2016 AQMP on June 30, 2016.. The population projections for this plan are based on SCAG's 2016-2040 RTP/SCS and include the proposed Project. Adoption of the 2016 AQMP by the SCAQMD Governing Board is scheduled for December 2016. Existing Air Quality Table 3 provides the current status of attainment of federal and State AAQS in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). The status has not changed since the certification of the 2015 Addendum. TABLE 3 DESIGNATIONS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN Pollutant State Federal 03 (1 -hour) Nonattainment No Standard 03 (8 -hour) Extreme Nonattainment PM10 Nonattainment Attainment/Maintenance PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainmenta CO Attainment Attainment/Maintenance NO2 Attainment Attainment/Maintenance SO2 Attainment Attainment Lead Attainment Attainment/Nonattainmentb All others Attain ment/Llnclassified No Standards 03: ozone; PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less; CO: carbon monoxide; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; SO2: sulfur dioxide. a On November 30, 2014, the USEPA proposed a finding that the SoCAB has attained the 1997 PM2.5 standards. If approved, the SoCAB would remain a nonattainment area for the 2006 PM2.5 standard. On September 30, 2015, the USEPA proposed a reclassification from Moderate to Serious for the 2006 PM2.5 standard. b, Federal Standard: Los Angeles County is classified as nonattainment for lead; the remainder of the SoCAB is in attainment. Source: CARB 2015a, 2014; USEPA 2015. Impact Analysis Construction Emissions — Regional As discussed previously, demolition would require an estimated 490 haul truck round trips over a period of 10 weeks, an average of approximately 10 round trips per day. Excavation for the subterranean levels of the garage would require approximately 1,694 truckloads of soil to be exported from the site. Excavation for the subterranean levels of the residential tower would require approximately 242 truckloads of soil to be exported from the site. Construction -related criteria pollutant emissions would occur during operation of construction equipment; generation of fugitive dust from grading and earth -moving activities; export of excavated soil; import of construction materials; and operation of vehicles driven to and from the site by construction workers. Project -generated construction emissions were estimated using the California Emission Estimator Model (CaIEEMod) Version 2013.2.2 computer program (SCAQMD 2013b). CaIEEMod is designed to model construction emissions for land development projects and allows for the input of project- and County -specific information. The CaIEEMod model input was based on the construction assumptions described above and in the Project Description and on information provided by the Project Applicant. Where specific information was not known, engineering judgment and default CaIEEMod settings and parameters were used. The model inputs include estimated equipment use (e.g., dozers and loaders) for each construction phase and the duration of each phase. The model also includes dust -control measures in accordance R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 19 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 with the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 403, Fugitive Dust (see Standard Condition [SC] 4.3-1). Architectural coating emissions were calculated separately. Based on the requirements of FEIR 1054 Mitigation Measure (MM) 3.6-3, it was assumed that construction equipment with engines conforming to Tier 3 emission standards or better would be used for all phases of construction. Table 4 presents the estimated maximum daily emissions for proposed project construction and compares the estimated emissions with the SCAQMD daily mass emission thresholds. TABLE 4 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS (POUNDS/DAY) Year of Construction ROG NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 2017 3 40 42 6 3 2018 2 20 33 3 2 2019 41 28 46 4 2 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 1 100 1 550 1 150 1 55 Exceeds Threshold? I No I No I No I No I No ROG: reactive organic gases; NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. Emissions shown are for winter season; summer emissions would be the same or slightly less. Source: CalEEMod data in Appendix B. As shown in Table 4, construction -related emissions generated by the proposed project would be below the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant, which is consistent with the conclusion in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Estimated emissions for the proposed project would be less than those anticipated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, which forecasted significant and unavoidable ROG and NOx construction emissions. FEIR 1054 MMs 3.6-1 through 3.6-4, while not required, would be incorporated into the proposed project as MMs 4.3-1 through 4.3-4 to minimize construction emissions. Construction Emissions — Local/Ambient Air Quality In addition to the mass daily emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, short-term local impacts to nearby sensitive receptors from on-site emissions of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), respirable particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM10), and fine particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) are examined based on SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds (LST) method. To assess local air quality impacts for development projects without complex dispersion modeling, the SCAQMD developed screening (lookup) tables to assist lead agencies in evaluating impacts. For the purposes of an LST analysis, the SCAQMD considers receptors where it is possible that an individual could remain exposed to NO2 and CO for 1 hour and particulate matter for 24 hours. The lookup tables' emissions limits are based on the AAQS included in Appendix B and the SCAQMD Ambient Air Quality Thresholds shown in Table 4. The closest receptors are the occupants of the 32 condominium residences immediately north of the area to be developed and the employees and patrons of the retail businesses and church adjacent to the site. The nearest residences to construction activities are located to the north at approximately 40 feet from the nearest point of the proposed project site in the 3400 Avenue of the Arts apartment community. Table 5 shows the maximum daily on-site emissions for construction activities compared with the SCAQMD thresholds for local pollutants with receptors at 25 meters (82 feet); R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 20 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 the SCAQMD method prescribes the use of the 25 -meter factor for all receptors within 25 meters. The area of the proposed project site to be developed is approximately three acres. However, the proposed project would be developed in phases; therefore, the most conservative one -acre site thresholds are used. TABLE 5 LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS As shown in Table 5, the local emissions from construction of the proposed project would not exceed the thresholds. Therefore, local construction emissions would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. This impact is the same as in the 2015 Addendum. Localized construction impacts were not analyzed in FEIR 1054. Short-term cumulative impacts related to air quality could occur if proposed project construction and nearby construction activities were to occur simultaneously. In particular, with respect to local impacts, cumulative construction particulate (i.e., fugitive dust) impacts are considered when projects are located within a few hundred yards of each other. However, as shown in Table 5, construction emissions would be below the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds; particularly, PM emissions would be less than six percent of the thresholds. Therefore, construction emissions of nonattainment pollutants would not be cumulatively considerable and proposed project impacts would be less than significant, which is consistent with the finding in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum for cumulative impacts. No mitigation is required. Long -Term Operation Operational emissions are composed of area, energy, and mobile (i.e., vehicle) source emissions. The primary source of operational criteria pollutant emissions from the proposed project, with the exception of volatile organic compounds (VOC), would be vehicles used by project guests, vendors, and staff. The proposed project's mobile source emissions are based on the project - related trip generation rate, as contained in the proposed project's trip generation analysis (Stantec 2016). The primary source of VOC emissions would be an area source (i.e., the consumer products used by hotel guests and staff). Emissions were calculated with the CaIEEMod model, discussed above. Estimated peak daily operational emissions are shown in Table 6. As presented in Table 6, operational emissions generated by the proposed project would be below the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant, consistent with the findings in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum for operational regional impacts. No mitigation is required. The Orange County portion of the SoCAB is a nonattainment area for 03, PM10, and PM2.5. The proposed project would generate these pollutants during long-term operations. As shown in R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 21 Environmental Analysis NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Emissions (lbs/day) Construction maximum daily on-site emissions 19 25 3.6 2.3 LSTs (1 -acre site) 92 647 4 3 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; PM2.5: particulate matter with a diameter 2.5 microns or less; lbs/day: pounds per day; LST: localized significance threshold. Note: Data is for SCAQMD Source Receptor Area 18, North Coastal Orange County. Source: SCAQMD 2009 (thresholds). See Appendix B for CalEEMod model outputs. As shown in Table 5, the local emissions from construction of the proposed project would not exceed the thresholds. Therefore, local construction emissions would be less than significant and mitigation is not required. This impact is the same as in the 2015 Addendum. Localized construction impacts were not analyzed in FEIR 1054. Short-term cumulative impacts related to air quality could occur if proposed project construction and nearby construction activities were to occur simultaneously. In particular, with respect to local impacts, cumulative construction particulate (i.e., fugitive dust) impacts are considered when projects are located within a few hundred yards of each other. However, as shown in Table 5, construction emissions would be below the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds; particularly, PM emissions would be less than six percent of the thresholds. Therefore, construction emissions of nonattainment pollutants would not be cumulatively considerable and proposed project impacts would be less than significant, which is consistent with the finding in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum for cumulative impacts. No mitigation is required. Long -Term Operation Operational emissions are composed of area, energy, and mobile (i.e., vehicle) source emissions. The primary source of operational criteria pollutant emissions from the proposed project, with the exception of volatile organic compounds (VOC), would be vehicles used by project guests, vendors, and staff. The proposed project's mobile source emissions are based on the project - related trip generation rate, as contained in the proposed project's trip generation analysis (Stantec 2016). The primary source of VOC emissions would be an area source (i.e., the consumer products used by hotel guests and staff). Emissions were calculated with the CaIEEMod model, discussed above. Estimated peak daily operational emissions are shown in Table 6. As presented in Table 6, operational emissions generated by the proposed project would be below the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant, consistent with the findings in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum for operational regional impacts. No mitigation is required. The Orange County portion of the SoCAB is a nonattainment area for 03, PM10, and PM2.5. The proposed project would generate these pollutants during long-term operations. As shown in R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 21 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Table 6, long-term emissions of PM10, PM2.5, and the 03 precursors VOC and NOx would be less than 25 percent of the SCAQMD significance thresholds. This magnitude of emissions would not be cumulatively considerable, and the cumulative impact would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. TABLE 6 PEAK DAILY OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Carbon Monoxide Hotspot A CO hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. The CO analysis in FEIR 1054 calculated future CO concentrations at the intersections of Bristol Street at Sunflower Avenue, Bristol Street at Anton Boulevard, and Avenue of the Arts and Anton Boulevard with the following results: • The future maximum 2010 and 2025 1 -hour CO concentrations would be 8.0 and 6.7 ppm, respectively, without and with the proposed project (i.e., no increase with the project). These values are compared with the State standard of 20.0 ppm. • The future maximum 2010 and 2025 8 -hour CO concentrations would be 6.5 and 5.4 ppm, respectively, without and with the proposed project. These values are compared with the State standard of 9.0 ppm. As stated in FEIR 1054, "The results of the CO modeling show that CO concentrations are not projected to exceed the State ambient air quality standards for either the 2010 or 2025 scenarios. The future CO concentrations with and without the proposed project are the same for all scenarios. Intersections in the proposed project vicinity would not be expected to experience CO concentrations in excess of the State standards. The proposed project would not result in a significant local air quality impact". As stated in the traffic analysis for the proposed project, "the approved and entitled project had no significant impact on the surrounding intersections as summarized in the 2007 EIR Traffic Study. The currently proposed project would generate a negligible amount of additional daily trips (60 trips), and therefore is expected to also not have a significant impact" (Stantec 2016). Therefore, it is concluded that CO concentrations for the three analyzed intersections with traffic from the proposed project would be the same or less than forecasted in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, and the impact would be less than significant, consistent with the findings in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum for local CO impacts. No mitigation is required. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 22 Environmental Analysis Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Emissions Source Area sources 9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Energy sources <0.5 2 1 <0.5 <0.5 Mobile sources 3 5 24 5 1 Total Operational Emissions 12 7 26 5 2 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 55 55 550 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No lbs/day: pounds per day; VOC: volatile organic compounds; NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. Totals may not add due to rounding. Notes: Emissions are the higher of summer or winter seasons. Sox and lead emissions are not shown; these emissions would be negligible for the proposed project. CalEEMod model data sheets are included in Appendix B. Carbon Monoxide Hotspot A CO hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. The CO analysis in FEIR 1054 calculated future CO concentrations at the intersections of Bristol Street at Sunflower Avenue, Bristol Street at Anton Boulevard, and Avenue of the Arts and Anton Boulevard with the following results: • The future maximum 2010 and 2025 1 -hour CO concentrations would be 8.0 and 6.7 ppm, respectively, without and with the proposed project (i.e., no increase with the project). These values are compared with the State standard of 20.0 ppm. • The future maximum 2010 and 2025 8 -hour CO concentrations would be 6.5 and 5.4 ppm, respectively, without and with the proposed project. These values are compared with the State standard of 9.0 ppm. As stated in FEIR 1054, "The results of the CO modeling show that CO concentrations are not projected to exceed the State ambient air quality standards for either the 2010 or 2025 scenarios. The future CO concentrations with and without the proposed project are the same for all scenarios. Intersections in the proposed project vicinity would not be expected to experience CO concentrations in excess of the State standards. The proposed project would not result in a significant local air quality impact". As stated in the traffic analysis for the proposed project, "the approved and entitled project had no significant impact on the surrounding intersections as summarized in the 2007 EIR Traffic Study. The currently proposed project would generate a negligible amount of additional daily trips (60 trips), and therefore is expected to also not have a significant impact" (Stantec 2016). Therefore, it is concluded that CO concentrations for the three analyzed intersections with traffic from the proposed project would be the same or less than forecasted in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, and the impact would be less than significant, consistent with the findings in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum for local CO impacts. No mitigation is required. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 22 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 Criteria Pollutants from On -Site Construction Exposure of persons to NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions is discussed above and the local emissions are summarized in Table 5. As discussed, there would be a less than significant impact and no mitigation is required. Toxic Air Contaminant (Diesel Particulate Matter) Emissions from On -Site Construction Construction activities would result in short-term, project -generated emissions of diesel particulate matter (diesel PM) from the exhaust of off-road, heavy-duty diesel equipment used for site preparation (e.g., demolition, excavation, and grading), paving, and building (construction). CARB identified diesel PM as a toxic air contaminant (TAC) in 1998. The dose to which receptors are exposed is the primary factor used to determine health risk. Dose is a function of the concentration of a substance or substances in the environment and the duration of exposure to the substance. Thus, the risks estimated for a maximally exposed individual (MEI) are higher if a fixed exposure occurs over a longer time period. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, health risk assessments, which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to TAC emissions, should be based on a 70 -year exposure period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of activities associated with a project. There would be few pieces of off-road, heavy-duty diesel equipment in operation, and the construction period would be short (approximately 18 months) when compared to a 70 -year exposure period. When considering these facts, combined with the highly dispersive properties of diesel PM and additional reductions in particulate emissions from newer construction equipment (as required by USEPA and CARB regulations), it can be concluded that TAC emissions during construction of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial emissions of TACs. There would be a less than significant impact and no mitigation is required. This impact is consistent with the conclusion in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Odors The proposed project would not generate objectionable odors, which are generally associated with agricultural activities, landfills and materials transfer stations, the generation or treatment of sewage, the use or generation of chemicals, food processing, or other activities that generate unpleasant odors. There would be no impact. During construction, the proposed project would require the use of equipment that may generate odors. Potential construction odors would result from on-site construction equipment's diesel exhaust emissions, roofing, or paving operations. However, these odors would be temporary and would dissipate rapidly from the source with an increase in distance. Construction odors would be considered less than significant. No mitigation is required. Related Planning Programs FEIR 1054 discussed consistency between the previously approved project and applicable plans and programs. Table 3.6-13 of FEIR 1054 addressed the previously approved project's consistency with the relevant objectives, goals, and policies from the City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan Conservation Element, SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide, and the SCAQMD's AQMP. As detailed in Section 4.11, the proposed project would be consistent with the recently approved General Plan objectives related to air quality, and there would be no impact. The SCAQMD AQMP has been updated and some proposed project construction impacts are different from the FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum analysis. As demonstrated in Tables 4, 5, R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 23 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 and 6, pollutant emissions from the proposed project would be less than the SCAQMD thresholds and would not result in a significant impact. Additionally, it may be assumed that the development planned in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum was used in the planning assumptions for the 2012 AQMP and Draft 2016 AQMP. As detailed in Section 4.17, Traffic, the proposed project would generate 60 more ADT than anticipated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum; however, as shown in Table 6, mobile source emissions would be less than 10 percent of SCAQMD thresholds (Stantec 2016). Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the 2012 AQMP. There would be no impact, and no mitigation is required. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the air quality analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential air quality impacts associated with the previously approved project to less than significant levels. The following measures from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Any modifications to the original measures are shown in strikethro gh for deleted text and new inserted text is underlined. Standard Condition SC 4.3-1 During construction of the proposed project, the Property Owner/Developer and its Contractors shall be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403, which shall assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions. SCAQMD Rule 402 requires that air pollutant emissions not be a nuisance off site. SCAQMD Rule 403 (Tables 1, 2, and 3 of Rule 403) requires that fugitive dust be controlled with the best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. This requirement shall be included as notes on the Contractor Specifications. Mitigation Measures The following MMs from FEIR 1054, while not required to reduce potential significant impacts, would be incorporated, as modified, into the proposed project to minimize construction emissions. The discussion included at the end of MM 4.3-3 has been deleted, primarily because (1) low NOx fuels have not been found to be commercially viable nor particularly desirable because of associated increased emissions of carbon dioxide and (2) cleaner engines for construction equipment and on -road heavy trucks are being incorporated into fleets through federal and State regulations. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 24 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 Construction: Dust Control MM 4.3-1 During construction and grading activities, the Applicant shall comply with measures set forth in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to ensure that airborne dust is kept to a minimum. Construction: Construction Equipment Emission Control MM 4.3-2 Prior to commencement of construction activities, the Applicant shall identify to the Development Services Department, a Construction -Relations Officer to act as a community liaison concerning on-site activity, including resolution of issues related to dust generation from grading/paving activities. MM 4.3-3 Prior to approval of grading plans, the Applicant shall include the following notes on the Contractor Specifications submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Department: "To reduce construction equipment emissions, the following measures shall be implemented when feasible: • Use low -emission mobile construction equipment. The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with California Air Resources Board (CARB) requirements for heavy construction equipment. • Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned. • Use low sulfur fuel for stationary construction equipment. This is required by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rules 431.1 and 431.2. • Use existing power sources (i.e., power poles) when available. This measure would minimize the use of higher polluting gas or diesel generators. • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes. Construction should be planned so that lane closures on existing streets are kept to a minimum. • Schedule construction operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours to the greatest extent practicable. • Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities (the plan may include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation and satellite parking areas with a shuttle service)." R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 25 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 Construction: Reactive Organic Gas Control MM 4.3-4 Reduce ROG emissions from painting activities. Painting tiVitieS from the PFGjeGt w, uld result ;r a SigRif Gant air quality ;MpaGt. The following measures should be implemented when feasible. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall provide evidence to the Development Services Development that the following measures shall be incorporated into project construction to the greatest extent feasible and the following measures should be provided as notes on the Contractor Specifications: The project shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113, which limits the ROG content of architectural coatings used in the South Coast Air Basin or shall allow the averaging of such coatings, as specified, so that actual emissions do not exceed the allowable emissions if all the averaged coatings had complied with the specified limits. • Use high transfer efficiency painting methods such as HVLP (High Volume Low Pressure) sprayers and brushes/rollers where possible. 4.4 AVIATION SAFETY 4.4.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 As described in FEIR 1054, at 270 feet above ground level (AGL), the previously approved project would be below the maximum allowable building height of 280 feet AGL for high-rise residential condominiums as set forth in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. However, because the previously approved project would exceed the 173 foot AGL height threshold requiring a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) determination of "No Hazard", a request for an FAA determination was previously filed in order to comply with the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) requirements for specific project referrals. At the time FEIR 1054 was prepared, an FAA determination had not been made. It was anticipated that the residential high-rise element of the previously approved project would be found to constitute "No Hazard" by the FAA due to its total structure height (270 feet AGL/304 feet above mean sea level [msl]) being less than the John Wayne Airport circling minimums floor of 340 above msl. However, until the FAA issued a final determination relating to hazard, no firm conclusion could be reached. Therefore, FEIR 1054 identified standard conditions that were intended to ensure that, despite the FAA determination, the previously approved project would not represent a significant safety hazard related to building height. With respect to increased air traffic patterns, the previously approved project would introduce approximately 300 people to the local area population through development of 120 condominium units. This change to population would not cause a substantial alteration to air traffic patterns through a substantial increase or decrease of air passengers. According to FEIR 1054, no impact R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 26 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 related to air traffic patterns would occur with the previously approved project; therefore, no resultant hazards would occur. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to the Addendum to FEIR 1054, impacts due to safety hazards related to building height were determined to be less than significant. Consistent with the FEIR 1054 analysis, a new FAA determination of No Hazard was requested by was not obtained prior to approval of the 2015 Addendum; therefore, Standard Conditions 4.4-1 through 4.4-7 were identified as applicable to the modified project. Therefore, with incorporation of Standard Conditions from FEIR 1054, impacts related to aviation safety were determined to be consistent with the previously approved project analyzed in FEIR 1054. No impacts were found related to increased air traffic patterns. 4.4.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW As shown on Exhibits 5a through 5d and as discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description and Setting, the proposed hotel tower would have a maximum height of 193.5 feet AGL, which is consistent with the maximum building height analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, and would be below the maximum allowable building height of 280 feet AGL for high-rise residential condominiums set forth in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. Although an FAA determination of "No Hazard" was obtained for the previously approved project, a new determination is needed for the proposed project. Similar to the circumstances addressed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, a request for FAA determination is currently in process in order to comply with the ALUC requirements for specific project referrals, and it is anticipated that the hotel high-rise element of the proposed project will be found to constitute "No Hazard" by the FAA due to its total maximum structure height (220 feet AGL/254 feet above msl) being less than the John Wayne Airport circling minimum floor of 340 above msl. However, until the FAA issues a final determination relating to hazards, no firm conclusion could be reached. Therefore, consistent with FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, Standard Conditions 4.4-1 through 4.4-7 are identified to ensure that, despite the lack of formal FAA determination, the proposed project would not represent a significant safety hazard related to building height. With respect to increased air traffic patterns, the proposed project would introduce approximately 65 people to the local area population through development of the 150 -room high-rise hotel tower. Consistent with the findings in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, neither of these changes to population would cause a substantial alteration to air traffic patterns through the increase or decrease of air passengers. No impact related to air traffic patterns would occur; therefore, no resultant hazards would occur. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the aviation analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 27 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project to less than significant levels. The following measures from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Any modifications to the original measures are shown in stFikethro gh for deleted text for new inserted text is underlined. Project Design Feature PDF 4.4-1 The proposed high-rise residential hotel tower has been designed to not exceed the established circling minimums floor for John Wayne Airport of 340 feet above mean sea level. Standard Conditions Land Use Element Policy LU -1C.3 prohibits the City from approving a project with an adverse FAA determination in the absence of an independent aeronautical study that states the contrary. Essentially, this means that a project receiving such FAA hazard determinations would not be approved. Therefore, no mitigation is necessary. To memorialize the City's procedures and conclusions, the conditions of approval listed below were included in FEIR 1054 and would be incorporated into the proposed project. SC 4.4-1 Prior to final master plan approval, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Costa Mesa, a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Determination of No Hazard to air navigation. If the FAA requires conditions for the finding of no hazard to air navigation, such as installation of roof -top obstruction lighting, said conditions shall be placed as conditions of approval on the final master plan. SC 4.4-2 In the event a proposed high-rise building is determined to be a hazard to air navigation by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the building design shall be appropriately modified prior to issuance of building permits so that an FAA Determination of No Hazard to air navigation can be obtained. SC 4.4-3 The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) No Hazard Determination shall be valid at the time of building permit issuance for the high-rise structure. The City shall expressly prohibit issuance of any building permit for a structure in the absence of a current and valid FAA No Hazard Determination. SC 4.4-4 The applicant shall comply with the final Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) No Hazard Determination issued on July 23, 2007, which established a maximum building height of 304 254 feet above mean sea level for the proposed high-rise resident hotel tower at 3350 Avenue of the Arts. Amendments to the testa -Mesa 2009 2015-2035 General Plan and North Costa Mesa Specific Plan are not necessary to accommodate additional building height of up to 2-90 220 feet above ground level (AGL) as specified in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. In addition, this EIR has examined the maximum building heights as defined in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and concluded that no significant impacts will occur. SC 4.4-5 The Applicant shall work with John Wayne Airport and City staff on a "Grant of Avigation Easement" for a specified area of the subject property that penetrates the imaginary horizontal surface of John Wayne Airport above elevation 206 feet above mean sea level (NAVD 88). The Applicant shall grant this Avigation Easement to the County of Orange/John Wayne Airport to permit the R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 28 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 unencumbered and unrestricted flight of aircraft to or from John Wayne Airport. Recordation of the Avigation Easement shall occur prior to issuance of any building permit that penetrates the imaginary horizontal surface of John Wayne Airport. 4.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.5.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 FEIR 1054 did not address biological resources for the previously approved project. The Initial Study prepared for the EIR found that, because the previously approved project site was developed and located in an urban area, it would not impact any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species, nor would it substantially impact any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. Due to the lack of wetlands and water bodies in the area, it was determined that the previously approved project would not impact nor would it interfere with the movement of resident or migratory fish or wildlife species and it would not conflict with local policies protecting biological resources. FEIR 1054 also concluded that the previously approved project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources and that it would not conflict with provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other habitat conservation plan. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 The area analyzed for development in the 2015 Addendum is located in a highly urban area that was previously analyzed and approved for development as part of FEIR 1054, and it does not support any significant biological resources. The modified project analyzed in the 2015 Addendum would not create any impacts to biological resources, consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054. 4.5.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project would involve construction of a 150 -room hotel high-rise tower in the same development footprint previously analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The area proposed for development is located in a highly urban area that was previously analyzed and approved for development as part of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, and it does not support any significant biological resources. Based on a current review of the proposed project site, conditions on the three -acre site have not changed since certification of FEIR 1054 and approval R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 29 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 of the 2015 Addendum; therefore, the previous determination of "no impact" to biological resources is still valid and implementation of the proposed project would not create any new impacts to biological resources. Specifically, the proposed project would not create impacts related to habitat modification, riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities, federally protected wetlands, migratory wildlife corridors, or native wildlife nursery sites. Since no habitat, wetlands, or corridors are present on the site or nearby, the proposed project would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural Community Conservation Plan; or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to biological resources. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the biological resources analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. 4.6 CULTURAL/SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES 4.6.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 FEIR 1054 did not address cultural resources. As stated in the Initial Study prepared for the EIR, impacts to cultural resources were originally contemplated in the General Plan Historic/Cultural Resources Element and the General Plan EIR. According to the Initial Study, no buildings would be demolished as part of the previously approved project that are of cultural or historical significance and no such buildings exist on the development site. It was concluded that there would be no impact to historical resources due to implementation of the previously approved project. As discussed in the Initial Study prepared for FEIR 1054, the City's General Plan identifies previously identified archaeological sites in Costa Mesa. These sites are primarily located on or near the bluffs overlooking the Santa Ana River or Upper Newport Bay. According to FEIR 1054, the previously approved project site is located in an urbanized area where substantial grading has already occurred. The City's Historic Preservation Ordinance contains provisions and established procedures to preserve historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources. Adherence to those procedures would ensure that no impacts occur during implementation of the previously approved project. In addition, the City requires the monitoring of grading operations when a site is reasonably suspected of containing historic and/or cultural resources. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 30 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 The previously approved project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource and would be conditioned to adhere to the City's requirement for monitoring during grading operations to ensure that no remains are disturbed. According to the Initial Study prepared for FEIR 1054, the City coordinated with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 18 and received correspondence from the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians recommending that a Native American monitor and archaeologist be present during site excavation and grading. Therefore, a standard condition was identified requiring Native American monitoring, and impacts were found to be less than significant. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 The 2015 Addendum determined that, because the conditions of the site have not changed since preparation of FEIR 1054, the previous determination of "no impact" related to cultural resources was still valid, and implementation of the modified project as analyzed in the 2015 Addendum, with adherence to the identified Standard Condition, would not create any new impacts to cultural resources. 4.6.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project site is located in a highly urban area that was previously analyzed and approved for development as part of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Based on a review of the proposed project site, conditions on the three -acre site have not changed since certification of FEIR 1054 and approval of the 2015 Addendum. Therefore, the previous determination of "no impact" related to cultural resources is still valid, and implementation of the proposed project, with adherence to the identified Standard Condition, would not create any new impacts to cultural resources assuming the proposed project is conditioned to adhere to the City's requirements for monitoring during grading operations if the site is reasonably suspected of containing historic and/or cultural resources and to ensure that no remains are disturbed. No additional ground disturbance or excavation would occur beyond what was evaluated and approved in the previous environmental document; therefore, the same area would be subject to impacts, and no new impacts related to cultural resources would occur. As a result, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact, nor would it create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to cultural resources. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact and it would not create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the cultural resources analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 31 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project to less than significant levels. The following measure from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Standard Condition SC 4.6-1 Site excavation and grading shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist and Native American monitor. If archaeological materials are identified during grading and construction, all construction activities shall be temporarily halted or redirected to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of archaeological materials as determined by the City, who shall establish, in cooperation with the project proponent, certified archaeologist, and Native American representative, the appropriate procedures for exploration and/or salvage of the artifacts. Monitoring is only required where grading and excavation activities would disturb soils at a depth of 5 feet or more. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. 4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.7.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 As set forth in the Initial Study prepared for FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. In addition, the previously approved project would connect to City sewer lines and wastewater disposal systems. FEIR 1054 concluded that compliance with Uniform Building Code (UBC)/California Building Code (CBC) and City Municipal Code requirements, standard conditions, and identified mitigation measures would reduce impacts related to geology and soils to a level considered less than significant. Specifically, FEIR 1054 concluded that the potential for ground rupture due to fault displacement beneath the site is considered low; however, the previously approved project site may experience moderate to occasionally high intensity ground shaking from a major earthquake or other regionally active or currently unknown faults in the region within the lifetime of the proposed structures. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 32 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Additionally, FEIR 1054 identified that the previously approved project site is within a liquefaction hazard zone. It was determined that a site-specific geotechnical investigation would be required to evaluate the density of terrain layers and to provide design recommendations, if applicable. FEIR 1054 also determined that the artificial fill and near -surface alluvium present beneath the existing paving on the previously approved project site may be unsuitable to support the proposed structural foundations and, if soils are deemed to be unsuitable to support the proposed structures, they would be exported and disposed of. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique HoteUHigh-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 With the incorporation of all applicable Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures from FEIR 1054, impacts related to the exposure of people or structures to seismic -related hazards for the modified project as analyzed in the 2015 Addendum were determined to be consistent with those in FEIR 1054. Consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054 and according to the 2015 Addendum, the modified project would require a site-specific geotechnical investigation to evaluate the density of terrain layers and to provide for design recommendations, if applicable. It was determined that the modified project would not create any new significant impacts due to erosion, loss of topsoil, or ground disturbance, and it would not create a substantial increase in the severity of effects previously identified in FEIR 1054. 4.7.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Seismic risk at the proposed project site was comprehensively analyzed as part of the previous environmental documentation and nothing has changed related to local geologic conditions or impacts related to seismic hazards. The proposed project site continues to be located in an area that may be subject to strong ground shaking due to seismic activity; however, the proposed project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Construction on the proposed project site has historically occurred in a manner consistent with City and State codes and Mitigation Measures. All future development associated with the proposed project would comply with applicable Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures from FEIR 1054 as detailed below; therefore, impacts related to the exposure of people or structures to seismic -related hazards would be the same for the proposed project. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact, nor would it create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Consistent with the conclusion of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the site is located in a liquefaction hazard zone, as delineated by the California Geological Survey. The combination of the liquefaction hazard and presence of shallow groundwater (i.e., within ten feet) beneath the proposed project site would result in a potentially significant liquefaction hazard for the proposed project. Consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, a site-specific geotechnical investigation would be required to evaluate the density of terrain layers and to provide for design recommendations, if applicable. Further, consistent with The Lakes — Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement requirements, the geotechnical report shall be provided to the adjacent property owners. Due to the nature of the proposed project and the location of the site in a relatively flat and developed area, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in substantial erosion or loss of topsoil. Furthermore, construction activities would be performed pursuant to the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. No additional ground disturbance beyond what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054 would occur. The proposed R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 33 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 project would not create a new significant impact, and it would not create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact, nor would it create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the geology and soils analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project to less than significant levels. The following measures from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Standard Condition SC 4.7-1 Where studies indicate that buildings may be subject to substantial damage during earthquakes, the structure shall be designed and/or retrofitted for seismic resistance in compliance with all relevant recommendations for seismic design and seismic safety in the most recent editions of the Uniform Building Code and the California Building Code. Mitigation Measures MM 4.7-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a site-specific final geotechnical investigation, including an evaluation, analysis, and mitigation recommendations for the issues identified in the Zeiser Kling Consultants' Geotechnical Evaluation (March 2007), including appropriate dust control measures and waterproof building designs with hydrostatic pressure resistive properties and a site specific probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for ground motion. All recommendations shall be incorporated into the final grading plan for the project. The project shall incorporate all recommendations of the detailed Geotechnical Report into the plans and specifications as required by the City Engineer. MM 4.7-2 During grading operations, special handling of on-site soils shall be required due to high moisture content of the soils. The City shall monitor the Grading Contractor to ensure stabilization of the soils during grading and excavation activities, as recommended by the Zeiser Kling Consultants' Geotechnical Evaluation (March 2007). MM 4.7-3 Prior to the issuance of the first demolition and/or grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that pile foundations or other appropriate design be incorporated into R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 34 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 the project design to mitigate potential settlement hazards and liquefaction beneath the proposed structures. MM 4.7-4 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit a project design to ensure that any proposed subterranean portion of the structures are waterproofed and designed and installed to resist hydrostatic pressures associated with the shallow groundwater table in the area. 4.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 4.8.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 The proposed project involves modifications to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential project that was approved based on the previously certified FEIR 1054, which was certified on November 20, 2007. At the time the FEIR was certified, GHG emissions were not part of the required CEQA analysis. Effective March 18, 2010, the State adopted amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines requiring the analysis and mitigation of the effects of GHG emissions in draft CEQA documents. The State CEQA Guidelines regarding GHG emissions do not specifically address situations involving subsequent implementation actions for a project with a previously certified EIR. However, as described below, courts have ruled that there is no requirement to address GHG emissions in an Addendum to an EIR that was completed prior to the adopted CEQA amendments. Although there is no requirement to address GHG emissions in this Addendum, an analysis is provided following the discussion of relevant court decisions. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Prosect Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 The 2015 Addendum demonstrated that the estimated GHG emissions for the modified project would be 1,561 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year and less than a 3,000 MTCO2e per year screening level suggested by SCAQMD to identify projects that would have a less than significant GHG impact. The GHG emissions for the modified project would also be less than the estimated GHG emissions for the FEIR 1054 project (2,261 MTCO2e per year). Therefore, the 2015 Addendum also concluded that implementation of the modified project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. 4.8.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Court Decisions Related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Subsequent California Environmental Quality Act Actions "Information on the effect of greenhouse gas emissions on climate change" does not constitute "new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time ... the IS/MND was adopted" (See Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development v. City of San Diego [2011 ] 196 Cal. App. 4th 515, 531-532 [rejecting claim that such information triggered the need for a supplemental EIR, and explaining that such information was known "long before the City approved the 1994 EIR" at issue]). R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 35 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Limiting GHG emissions to combat climate change has been a governmental goal since the late 1970s. As explained by the U.S. Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) 549 U.S. 497: "In the late 1970s, the Federal Government began devoting serious attention to the possibility that carbon dioxide emissions associated with human activity could provoke climate change. In 1978, Congress enacted the National Climate Program Act, 92 Stat. 601, which required the President to establish a program to `assist the Nation and the world to understand and respond to natural and man -induced climate processes and their implications"'. In 1987, Congress enacted the Global Climate Protection Act for the purpose of "establish[ing] a national climate program that will assist the Nation and the world to understand and respond to natural and man -induced climate processes and their implications" (15 United States Code [USC] 2902). The act required the establishment of various programs to further climate change research (15 USC 2904[d]). In 1988, the United Nations created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to provide scientific information regarding climate change to policy makers. In 1992, 154 nations, including the United States, entered into the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), a nonbinding agreement under which industrialized countries pledged to work to reduce GHG emissions. Five years later, in 1997, the parties to the UNFCCC adopted the Kyoto Protocol, which set binding GHG reduction targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European Community, with the objective of reducing their collective omissions by 5 percent below 1990 levels during the "commitment period" of 2008-2012. Further, as noted by the court in Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development v. City of San Diego (supra, 196 Cal. App. 41h 515), by 1990, the potential impacts of GHG emissions were already the subject of litigation, with the "Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) arguing that an `increase in fossil fuel combustion ... will ... lead to a global increase in temperatures, causing a rise in sea level and a decrease in snow cover that would damage the shoreline, forests, and agriculture of California"' (Id. at 531, quoting City of Los Angeles v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [D.C. Cir. 1990] 286 U.S. App. D.C. 78). Thus, by the 1990s, California's local governmental agencies were well aware of the importance of monitoring and limiting GHG emissions when approving projects. Since GHG impacts were known at the time that the previous environmental analysis was conducted, information regarding the proposed project's potential to impact climate change does not constitute new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time FEIR 1054 was adopted; thus, it does not trigger the need for any further environmental review Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analvsis Climate change refers to any significant change in climate, such as the average temperature, precipitation, or wind patterns over a period of time. Climate change may result from natural factors, natural processes, and human activities that change the composition of the atmosphere and alter the surface and features of the land. Significant changes in global climate patterns have been associated with global warming, which is an average increase in the temperature of the atmosphere near the Earth's surface; this is attributed to an accumulation of GHG emissions in the atmosphere. GHGs trap heat in the atmosphere which, in turn, increases the Earth's surface temperature. Some GHGs occur naturally and are emitted to the atmosphere through natural processes, while others are created and emitted solely through human activities. The IPCC has concluded that (IPCC 2013): Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 36 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased. The atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years. Carbon dioxide concentrations have increased by 40% since pre -industrial times, primarily from fossil fuel emissions and secondarily from net land use change emissions. Human influence on the climate system is clear. This is evident from the increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, positive radiative forcing, observed warming, and understanding of the climate system. Table 7 shows the magnitude of GHG emissions on the global, national, State, and regional scales. TABLE 7 COMPARISON OF WORLDWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Area and Data Year Annual GHG Emissions (MMTCO2e) World (2012) 46,049 United States (2014) 6,870 California (2013) 459 Orange County (2011) 21 GHG: greenhouse gas; MMTCOZe: million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. Source: WRI 2016; USEPA 2016; CARB 2015b, SCAG 2011. GHGs, as defined under California's Assembly Bill (AB) 32, include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). General discussions on climate change often include water vapor, ozone, and aerosols in the GHG category. Water vapor and atmospheric ozone are not gases that are formed directly in the construction or operation of development projects, nor can they be controlled in these projects. Aerosols are not gases. While these elements have a role in climate change, they are not considered by regulatory bodies, such as CARB, or climate change groups, such as the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR), as gases to be reported or analyzed for control. Therefore, no further discussion of water vapor, ozone, or aerosols is provided herein. GHGs vary widely in the power of their climatic effects; therefore, climate scientists have established a unit called global warming potential (GWP). The GWP of a gas is a measure of both its potency and lifespan in the atmosphere as compared to CO2. For example, since CH4 and N20 are approximately 25 and 298 times more powerful than CO2, respectively, in their ability to trap heat in the atmosphere, they have GWPs of 25 and 298, respectively (CO2 has a GWP of 1). Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) is a quantity that enables all GHG emissions to be considered as a group despite their varying GWP. The GWP of each GHG is multiplied by the emission rate of that gas to produce the CO2e emissions. On June 1, 2005, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order (EO) S-3-05, which calls for a reduction in GHG emissions to year 2000 levels by 2010, to year 1990 levels by 2020, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, recognizes that California is the source of substantial amounts of GHG emissions. The statute states: R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 37 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems. In order to avert these consequences, AB 32 establishes a State goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020, codifying the EO S-3-05 goal, which is a reduction of approximately 28 percent from forecasted emission levels, with further reductions to follow. On April 29, 2015, subsequent to the approval of the 2015 Addendum, Governor Edmund Brown signed EO B-30-15, which orders "A new interim statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is established in order to ensure California meets its target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050" (COOG 2015). In order to provide a reasonable comparison of the FEIR 1054 project and the proposed project, all GHG emissions are calculated using the CaIEEMod computer program described in Section 4.3, Air Quality, of this Addendum. Both the FEIR 1054 and proposed project calculations use an operational year of 2018 and model default parameters for area source, energy, water, and solid waste emissions factors. It was assumed that construction emissions for the FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum project would be the same as for the proposed project. This is a reasonable assumption because when construction emissions are amortized over the project lifetime, assumed to be 30 years, the construction emissions are a small fraction of the total emissions, and variations between projects would have negligible influence on conclusions. Final Environmental Impact Report 1054 Emissions GHG emissions were not calculated in the FEIR 1054. Therefore, as detailed in Section 4.17, Traffic, this analysis assumes the residential, bar/lounge, and retail portions of the previously - approved project as evaluated in would generate 1,191 ADT. For purposes of this analysis, this R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 38 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 figure is reduced to 1,110 ADT to account for the reduction in hotel rooms from 238 rooms to 200 rooms, as evaluated in FEIR 1054 air quality analysis. GHG emissions for the FEIR 1054 project are shown in Table 8. TABLE 8 ESTIMATED ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FOR FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 1054 PROJECT ADDITION Source Emissions (MTCO2e/yr) Area 40 Energy 623 Mobile 1,479 Waste 25 Water 54 Operational Emissions 2,222 Amortized Construction Emissions 39 Total GHG emissions 2,261 MTCOZe/yr: metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year; GHG: greenhouse gas. Total does not add due to rounding. Input and output details are included in Appendix B. Proposed Project Emissions GHG emissions for the proposed project are shown in Table 9. TABLE 9 ESTIMATED ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT Source Emissions (MTCO2e/yr) Area 0 Energy 1,051 Mobile 865 Waste 19 Water 14 Operational Emissions 1,950 Amortized Construction Emissions 38 Total GHG emissions 1,988 MTCO2e/yr: Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year; GHG: greenhouse gas. Total does not add due to rounding. Input and output details are included in Appendix B. As shown in Table 9, the estimated GHG emissions for the proposed project are 1,988 MTCO2e per year. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 39 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 Comaarative Analvsis In developing methods for GHG impact analysis, there have been suggestions for quantitative thresholds, often referred to as screening levels, that define an emissions level below which it may be presumed that climate change impacts would be less than significant. Neither the SCAQMD, the City of Costa Mesa, nor Orange County has adopted a significance threshold for the GHG emissions from nonindustrial development projects. Beginning in April 2008, the SCAQMD convened a Working Group to provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents. The Working Group is scheduled to meet once per month. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted its staff proposal for an interim CEQA GHG significance threshold of 10,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalent per year (MTCO2e/yr) for projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. The policy objective for establishing this significance threshold and the recommended screening thresholds, provided below, is to capture projects that represent approximately 90 percent of GHG emissions from new sources (SCAQMD 2008). These projects would be subject to further analysis and the incorporation of measures to reduce GHG emissions. In 2011, the SCAQMD added the 10,000 MTCO2e/yr threshold for industrial facilities to its table of air quality significance thresholds. In September 2010, the Working Group presented a tiered approach to determining GHG significance for residential and commercial projects (SCAQMD 2010). At Tier 1, GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant if the project qualifies under a categorical or statutory CEQA exemption. At Tier 2, for projects that do not meet the Tier 1 criteria, the GHG emissions impact would be less than significant if the project is consistent with a previously adopted GHG reduction plan that meets specific requirements. At Tier 3, the SCAQMD has proposed, but not adopted, separate screening thresholds for residential projects (3,500 MTCO2e/yr), commercial projects (1,400 MTCO2e/yr), and mixed-use projects (3,000 MTCO2e/yr) or a single numerical threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for all nonindustrial land use projects. The SCAQMD-proposed threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for all nonindustrial projects is used for the proposed project. A project with emissions less than the applicable screening value would be considered to have less than significant GHG emissions. The Working Group has not convened since fall 2010. As of July 2016, the proposal has not been considered or approved for use by the SCAQMD Board. As shown above, estimated GHG emissions for the proposed project are 1,988 MTCO2e per year. This value is less than the 3,000 MTCO2e per year significance threshold. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. GHG emissions for the proposed project would also be less than the 2,261 MTCO2e per year estimated for the FEIR 1054 project and greater than the 1,561 MTCO2e per year estimated for the modified project as evaluated in the 2015 Addendum project. The principal overall State plan and policy adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions is AB 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006). AB 32 establishes regulatory, reporting, and market mechanisms to achieve quantifiable reductions in GHG emissions and establishes a cap on Statewide GHG emissions. The quantitative goal of AB 32 is to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Senate Bill (SB) 375, signed in September 2008 (Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008), aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG reduction targets, and land use and housing allocations. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to adopt an SCS or alternative planning strategy (APS) that will address land use allocation in that MPO's RTP. SB R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 40 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 375 is being addressed at the State and regional levels, and the principles of SB 375 are incorporated in the adopted SCAG 2016-2040 RTP/SCS. The regulations, plans, and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions that are directly applicable to the project include the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings and the Title 24 California Green Building Standards Code. These codes are enforced by the City, and adherence to standard requirements for construction and operations would ensure that the proposed project would comply with both of these regulations. The project site is located in a developed area with nearby access to commercial and employment centers. As discussed in FEIR 1054, development associated with the previously approved project was designed to maximize pedestrian and bicycle accessibility. These factors would reduce vehicle use and vehicle miles traveled and GHG emissions, which are goals of SB 375 and the RTP/SCS. As previously discussed, the increase in GHG emissions would be less than SCAQMD's recommended screening threshold for nonindustrial land use projects. Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. There would be no impact. Conclusion GHG impacts were known at the time that FEIR 1054 was prepared, and information regarding the proposed project's potential to impact climate change does not constitute new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time FEIR 1054 was adopted. No GHG emissions analysis is required. However, it is also demonstrated that the project GHG emissions would be less than significant using current CEQA analysis methods and suggested SCAQMD significance criteria. ! /_1t,411 N B161F_1 `I Il: /_f4_1 N 1141WELy, /_110 4 V /t1 %' 4.9.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to the Initial Study prepared for FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. No hazardous materials would be stored on the site or be used in conjunction with the previously approved project. The previously approved project site is not located within % mile of an existing or proposed school, nor is it included on a list of hazardous materials sites. The previously approved project is not anticipated to emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste, and no impact would occur. According to FEIR 1054 and with respect to adopted emergency response and evacuation plans, the previously approved project would be required to meet all applicable local fire codes for adequate access to and from the site. Project plans would be subject to the acceptance of the Costa Mesa Fire Department and Police Department to ensure that the development proposed would not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The previously approved project is not anticipated to involve increased fire hazard as the site is in a developed area. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 41 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 As described in FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would involve the demolition of the existing parking structure; the interior renovation of the existing hotel; and the construction of a high-rise residential tower. During demolition and construction operations, hazardous materials associated with the on-site uses could be present. Demolition debris generated may include asphalt paving, dirt, concrete, asphalt, and other building materials. The presence of asbestos would pose a significant impact to demolition workers during the demolition and removal of such material. This potential significant impact would be reduced to a level considered less than significant through implementation of mitigation. The Phase I Report identified that no impact related to exposure to lead or radon would occur. As analyzed in FEIR 1054, chemicals associated with housekeeping services, paints and thinners, water treatment chemicals, compressed gas such as nitrogen, chlorine tablets and muriatic acid for pool maintenance, and liquid detergent may be used and stored on site; however, these materials are common for hotel uses and do not represent a significant environmental concern. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to the 2015 Addendum, development of the modified project would not result in new impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans, fire hazards, and the use and storage of chemicals on site. Consistent with the analysis presented in FEIR 1054, impacts related to asbestos exposure would continue to pose a significant impact to demolition workers; however, implementation of MM 4.9-1 from FEIR 1054 would reduce this impact to less than significant levels. Additionally, no new hazardous materials sites were identified compared to the FEIR 1054 analysis, and no impacts would occur. Overall, it was concluded as part of the 2015 Addendum that impacts from hazards and hazardous materials would be consistent with those of FEIR 1054. 4.9.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW As discussed previously, the area proposed for development is located in the same development footprint analyzed and approved as part of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Based on review of the proposed project site, conditions and uses on the three -acre site have not changed since certification of FEIR 1054 and approval of the 2015 Addendum. Therefore, development of the proposed project would not result in new hazards and hazardous materials impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans, fire hazards, and the use and storage of chemicals on site. Consistent with the analysis presented in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, impacts related to asbestos exposure would continue to pose a significant impact to demolition workers. However, implementation of MM 4.9-1 from FEIR 1054 would reduce this impact to less than significant levels. With respect to hazardous materials sites, according to the Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Radius Map Report with Geocheck° prepared for the proposed project site by Environmental Data Resources, Inc., the sites discussed below have been listed within a'/4 mile of the proposed project site (EDR 2016). Please refer to Appendix C for a copy of the EDR Report. None of these sites are listed on the Cortese list. The Wyndham (3350 Avenue of the Arts). This site has been recorded in the Hazardous Waste Information System (HAZNET) database, which contains a waste category of unspecified organic liquid mixture. This listing is associated with the current hazardous waste manifest system, which is a set of forms, reports, and procedures designed to seamlessly track hazardous waste from the time it leaves the generator facility where it was produced, until it reaches the off-site waste management facility that will store, treat, R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 42 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 and/or dispose of the hazardous waste. The system allows the waste generator to verify that its waste has been properly delivered and that no waste has been lost or unaccounted for in the process (USEPA 2014b). The disposal method is listed as "treatment, tank". The most recent listing was identified in 2001. • Segerstrom Center for the Arts (600, 615 Town Center Drive). This is a cluster of two sites listed as having active underground storage tank (UST) facilities. No additional information was provided. Ocean Park Cleaners (580 Anton Boulevard, Suite 213). This site has been recorded in multiple databases, including the Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act — Small Quantity Generators (RCRA-SQG), the HAZNET, the NPDES, the Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO), and the DRYCLEANERS databases. The waste category is halogenated solvents (e.g., chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene); aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent; and solids or sludges with halogenated organic compounds greater than or equal to 1,000 milligrams/liter (mg/L). The disposal method is listed as "recycler". No violations were found and the building has since been demolished. • Center Town (650 Town Center Drive). This is a cluster of two sites recorded in multiple databases, including the UST, the Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS UST), the Facility Inventory Database (CA FID UST), and the Emission Inventory Data (EMI) databases. This site includes at least one diesel tank, and the site's current status is "active". • Pacific Southwest Realty (555 Anton Boulevard). This site has been recorded in multiple databases, including the CA FID UST and the EMI databases. The site's current status is "active". • South Coast Metro Center (575 Anton Boulevard). This site has been recorded in multiple databases, including the UST and the SWEEPS UST. This site includes at least one diesel tank, and its current status is "active". • Westin South Coast Plaza (686 Anton Boulevard). This site has been recorded in the UST database. No additional information was provided. • Marriott Suites (500 Anton Boulevard). This site has been recorded in multiple databases, including the UST, the SWEEPS UST, and the CA FID UST. This site includes at least one diesel tank, and its current status is "active". • Metro Fire Station (3350 Sakioka Drive). This site has been recorded in multiple databases, including the HAZNET, the SWEEPS UST, the CA FID UST, and the UST databases. The disposal method is listed as "other recovery of reclamation for reuse including acid regeneration, organics recovery, etc.". This site includes at least one diesel tank, and the most recent listing was identified in 2013. According to the EDR Radius Map and compared to the analysis presented in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, no new hazardous materials sites were identified within the proposed project site boundaries. Of the hazardous materials sites identified in the proposed project vicinity, none of the identified sites pose a hazard to the proposed project site. Further, the proposed project would not involve any changes in the operation or use of hazardous materials in comparison to the analysis presented in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, and no impacts would occur relative to the site. No mitigation is required. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 43 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact and it would not create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the hazards and hazardous materials analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project to less than significant levels. The following measure from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Mitigation Measure MM 4.9-1 All asbestos-related work, including demolition and renovation, shall be performed by a licensed Asbestos -abatement Contractor under the supervision of a certified Asbestos Consultant. Asbestos shall be removed and disposed of in compliance with notification and asbestos -removal procedures outlined in South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1403 to reduce asbestos-related health risks. 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 4.10.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 As set forth in the Initial Study for FEIR 1054, no portion of the previously approved project site is located in a 100 -year flood hazard area. Additionally, the southernmost portion of the City is approximately % mile inland from the Pacific Ocean at elevations between 30 to 100 feet above mean sea level, and no large bodies of water exist in the City that could produce seiche effects; therefore, there is very little potential that the previously approved project site would experience the effects of a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Additionally, the Initial Study concluded that the previously approved project would not result in any impacts related to groundwater. According to FEIR 1054, potential pollutant concentrations of storm water runoff from the previously approved project site during construction and operation would be reduced to below significant levels after implementing the best management practices and after City review and approval of the previously approved project's Water Quality Management Plan. Further, the Project Applicant would be responsible for obtaining coverage for the previously approved project under the California General Construction Activity Storm Water permit and for complying with the requirements of the permit. FEIR 1054 also identified a potential for the site to be subject to erosion, resulting in sediments carried off site via storm water runoff. However, it was determined R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 44 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 that impacts related to erosion and sedimentation would be mitigated to less than significant levels. Additionally, it was concluded that implementation of the previously approved project would not alter the volume of storm water draining from the previously approved project site; however, it would contribute storm flows to an already deficient system. Therefore, either minor modifications to the existing storm drain system or payment towards modification of the existing storm drain system and payment of drainage impact fees were identified to reduce impacts to levels considered less than significant. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique HoteUHigh-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to the 2015 Addendum, implementation of identified Mitigation Measures from FEIR 1054 related to NPDES permit requirements and Best Management Practices (BMPs) would reduce impacts from the modified project to groundwater, erosion and sedimentation, surface hydrology, and water quality to less than significant levels for the modified project. Consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054, no new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects would occur in relation to the modified project's flood hazard area. 4.10.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project area is considered urbanized, and the proposed project would occupy the same development footprint as previously analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Therefore, similar impacts to groundwater and surface hydrology and water quality as those identified in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum would be anticipated. The proposed project site is currently developed with the Avenue of the Arts Hotel and associated parking structure; there are no natural drainages on or near the site. Similar to existing conditions, following completion of construction activities, the proposed project site would consist primarily of impervious surfaces. Similar to existing conditions, the proposed project would include landscaped areas (which would serve as pervious areas) between the proposed hotel towers and to the existing hotel as well as along the site's eastern, western, and southern perimeters. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not substantially alter the amount or rate of runoff, nor would it result in on-site or off-site erosion or siltation. Continued implementation of identified Mitigation Measures related to NPDES permit requirements and BMPs would reduce impacts to groundwater, erosion and sedimentation, surface hydrology, and water quality to less than significant levels. Consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the proposed project site is located within Flood Zone X, which is outside the 100 -year and 500 -year floodplains. Therefore, a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects would not occur in relation to the proposed project's flood hazard area. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 45 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the hydrology and water quality analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project to less than significant levels. The following measures from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Any modifications to the original measures are shown in strikethrewgk for deleted text, and new inserted text is underlined. Project Design Features PDF 4.10-1 The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the proposed project includes the following project -specific water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) which shall be implemented as part of the project: Site Design BMPs • Permeable surface area has been kept the same as the existing condition. • Drive aisle has been minimized to least acceptable dimension for Fire Access and access to the proposed truck dock. • All areas available for landscaping have been utilized. Planter boxes will also be included on the design of the top story of the parking structure to help minimize impervious surfaces. • All parking is within a structure and covered. Non-structural Source Control BMPs �'�eewner-TenantedUGatien, aGtov4y-- ctivity restriction, common area landscape management, BMP maintenance, Title 22 CCR Compliance, local water quality permit compliance, uniform fire code implementation, common area litter control, employee training, housekeeping of loading docks, catch basin inspection, street sweeping of private streets and parking lots. Routine Structural BMPs • Storm drain stenciling and signage, proper trash storage and loading dock design, efficient irrigation, and landscape design. Treatment Control BMPs • CONTECH StormFilter will be used in the three on-site manhole installations. • Media filters will be used in the CONTECH Storm Filters. PDF 4.10-2 Prior to approval of the first mass grading plan, the Applicant shall submit a Proposed Storm Drain Improvement Plan to the Public Services Department for review and approval. The plan shall demonstrate substantial conformance with the R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 46 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Orange County Hydrology Manual for design of lateral storm drains and catch basins. Proposed storm drain improvements include: Line "A" — One new catch basin is proposed and the relocation of an existing catch basin to accommodate widening and re -alignment of the on- site drive aisle. • Line "B" — No new facilities are proposed. The Line B system will drain to an existing lateral located on the northern side of the property or directly to an Avenue of the Arts lateral. The tie-in location will be decided as building plans progress. • Line "C" — One new Avenue of the Arts storm drain connection is proposed to drain the southern portion of the site. The new line will include two on- site inlets. Mitigation Measures MM 4.10-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall verify that structural BMPs have been permanently incorporated into the project plans. Such BMPs shall ensure that pollutants from project -related storm water runoff are mitigated consistent with applicable State and local standards. MM 4.10-2 The Applicant shall assume all BMP inspection and maintenance responsibilities for the project. The Property -owners Association (POA) fees will provide the funding mechanism for long-term BMP maintenance. MM 4.10-3 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Development Services Department for review and approval a Water Quality Management Plan that: • addresses site design BMPs such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating reduced or "zero discharge" areas, and conserving natural areas; • incorporates the applicable Routine Source Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP; • incorporates Treatment Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP; • generally describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control BMPs; • identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs; and • describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. MM 4.10-4 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under California's General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number. The Applicant shall prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review on request. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 47 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MM 4.10-5 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide proof of an NPDES permit from the RWQCB—consistent with Order No. R8 2004.002 R8-2010-0062 and NPDES No. r°rvrcG998002 CAS618030 or current permits—to the City of Costa Mesa for dewatering activities. MM 4.10-6 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall prepare drainage plans for the Public Services Department's review and approval. The Drainage Plan shall define the exact size and location of drainage facilities, and shall address standing water on the project site during project grading. MM 4.10-7 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall pay drainage impact fees. The Project Developer shall be responsible for the drainage impact fees that are in place at the time grading permits are issued. 4.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING 4.11.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 As discussed in the Initial Study for FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would neither physically divide an established community, nor would it conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. The site is located in an existing developed area. The previously approved project required a General Plan Amendment to allow for a site-specific density increase to 44 dwelling units per acre under the existing High Density Residential land use designation and a Specific Plan Amendment to allow for modifications to the allowable floor - area ratio and the maximum number of allowable hotel rooms and dwelling units and to establish flexibility to modify the overall mix of hotel rooms and dwelling units. A Zoning Code amendment was not required for the previously approved project. According to the analysis presented in FEIR 1054, the previously approved project, as conditioned through the proposed General Plan and Specific Plan amendments, was found to be consistent with the City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan and the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. A consistency analysis was also presented, which concluded that the previously approved project was consistent with the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG's) Compass Growth Vision, 2004 Regional Transportation Plan, and 1996 Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide. As discussed in FEIR 1054, development associated with the previously approved project was designed to maximize pedestrian and bicycle accessibility, and all development goals, standards, and policies would be addressed and met through site-specific Final Master Plan review and approval. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to the 2015 Addendum, it was determined that adherence to the Standard Conditions from FEIR 1054 would ensure that no new impacts related to land use would occur with the modified project. Additionally, it was concluded that because the goals and policies for the related planning programs were consistent with what was evaluated in FEIR 1054 and the elements of the project under the 2015 Addendum and MMs were similar to the previously approved project evaluated in FEIR 1054, no new impacts would occur. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 48 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 As part of the requested entitlements analyzed in and approved with the 2015 Addendum, a variance was approved allowing the maximum number of units to increase the maximum allowable hotel room/dwelling unit count from 320 to 338, which represents a deviation from the Specific Plan regarding the maximum number of hotel rooms (200 rooms allowed; 238 rooms proposed). Therefore, impacts related to the modified project as evaluated in the 2015 Addendum would be consistent with the analysis for FEIR 1054, and there would be no impact. 4.11.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW According to the entitlements approved concurrent with certification of FEIR 1054, the overall mix of hotel rooms and residential units may be modified but could not exceed a total of 320 hotel rooms/dwelling units. As part of the requested entitlements analyzed in and approved with the 2015 Addendum, a variance was approved allowing the maximum number of units to increase the maximum allowable hotel room/dwelling unit count from 320 to 338. The proposed project would retain the existing 238 -room hotel and would construct a new 15 -story, 150 -room high-rise hotel tower, resulting in a total of 388 hotel rooms. As part of the project, the Project Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Master Plan to increase the total hotel room count from a 238 - room hotel to a 388 -room hotel to reflect retention of all of the rooms of the existing hotel as well as construction of a new 150 -room tower. The North Costa Mesa Specific Plan promotes development flexibility if it can be demonstrated that the traffic generation characteristics are comparable to the originally -approved project (referred to as Development Option No. 1 in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan). In this case and as detailed in Section 4.17, the minor increase in trip generation of 60 ADT would not generate any new significant traffic impacts and is, therefore, comparable to the previous approvals (i.e., the modified project evaluated in the 2015 Addendum and the originally approved project analyzed in FEIR 1054). A finding is required that the granting of a variance from the Specific Plan is consistent with the principles, intent, and goals of the Specific Plan. Adherence to the Standard Conditions from FEIR 1054, identified below, would ensure that no new impacts related to land use would occur. Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. No amendments to the Zoning Code, Specific Plan, or General Plan would be required. Related Planning Programs The goals and policies incorporated in the City's General Plan provide a basis for analyzing potential proposed project impacts. As discussed above, a consistency analysis of the proposed project with applicable goals and policies from the General Plan was prepared for FEIR 1054. Since that time and since approval of the 2015 Addendum, the 2015-2035 General Plan was approved. Therefore, a brief analysis of the proposed project's consistency with the current General Plan organized by element is provided below. Land Use Element The proposed project would be consistent with the existing land use designation for the project site as defined in the Land Use Element. Specifically, development on the project site would not exceed the maximum non-residential floor to area ratio of 2.12 FAR. Further, the Land Use Element defers development standards to the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan which includes specific provisions related to maximum overall development. Specifically and consistent with the analysis presented in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the proposed project would comply with development standards related to noise standards, lighting associated with parking structures, pedestrian linkages, parking R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 49 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 requirements, shade and shadow impacts, potential interface between residential and non-residential uses, and building height limitations. Additionally, the project has been designed and would be developed in an effort to minimize impacts to adjacent residential uses, consistent with Goals LU -1, -2, and -3 and Policies LU -1.2, 2.7, 2.9 and 2.11, 3.5, 3.8, 3.10, 3.12, and 3.13. Because the project would involve development within an area that is currently served by local utilities and public services, the project would be consistent with Policy LU -1.5. As detailed throughout this Addendum, the proposed project would protect Costa Mesa's environmental resources, consistent with Goal LU -4. Specifically, the project would comply with all water quality regulations in support of Policies LU -4.1, 4.2, and 4.5. As noted in Section 4.8, the project would comply with Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings and the Title 24 California Green Building Standards Code in support of Policy LU -4.6. The project's pedestrian circulation elements that integrate with the local uses in the immediate area would be consistent with General Plan policies LU -7.8 related to the expansion of pedestrian -oriented development. Circulation Element According to the Circulation Element, the project site is located within a pedestrian priority area. The project would support and increase in pedestrian activity in the area through the preservation the existing pedestrian walkway along Avenue of the Arts and by enhancing the pedestrian experience through a variety of landscaping along the hotel's frontage along Avenue of the Arts. Due to the site's location near the Segerstrom Center for the Arts, these pedestrian elements would encourage hotel patrons to access the various performing arts venues located west of, and across Avenue of the Arts from, the site. Additionally, the project would include internal pedestrian walkways providing easy access from the hotel to the surrounding land uses. Further, the project site is located within walking distance of multiple Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus routes and stops, thereby supporting Objective C -4.B and Policies C -4.B.1 and C-4.13.4, related to development along transit routes. Conservation Element As discussed in Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the project would comply with applicable regulations, plans, and polices adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, including Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings and the Title 24 California Green Building Standards Code. Further, the project is located in a developed area with nearby access to commercial and employment centers and would maximize pedestrian and bicycle accessibility. These factors would reduce vehicle use and vehicle miles traveled, and GHG emissions. Therefore, the project would be supportive of GOAL CON — 2 and would be consistent with Objective CON -2 and Policies CON -2.A and CON -4.F related to design and construction activities that focus on conservation and environmental sustainability. As discussed in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the project would comply with identified mitigation measures related to NPDES permit requirements and Best Management Practices (BMPs) and would reduce impacts to groundwater, erosion and sedimentation, surface hydrology, and water quality. Therefore, the project would be R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 50 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 consistent with Policies CON -3.F, CON -3.G, and CON -3.H related to stormwater management and compliance with the NPDES requirements. Noise Element The project would involve construction activities approximately 40 feet from the nearest residential uses. However, as discussed in Section 4.8, Noise, project construction would comply with the City's noise ordinance as well as the more restrictive noise limits established in The Lakes — Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement. Therefore, the project would be consistent with Objectives N-1 and N-2 and Policies N -1.A, N -2.B, N -2.D, and N -2.E. Safetv Element As discussed in Section 4.4, Aviation Safety, the project would comply with all requirements set forth by the FAA and the total maximum structure height of the proposed tower (220 feet AGL/254 feet above msl) would be less than the John Wayne Airport circling minimums floor of 340 above msl, Therefore, the project would be consistent with Policies S -1.P, S.1 -Q, S.1 -R, and S -1.S. Community Design Element As discussed previously, the project would support and encourage pedestrian activity in the area through the preservation the existing pedestrian walkway along Avenue of the Arts and by enhancing the pedestrian experience through a variety of landscaping along the hotel's frontage along Avenue of the Arts, thereby supporting Objective CD -1.1 related to the beautification of the City's visual environment along pedestrian paths and corridors. Additionally, the consistency analysis in FEIR 1054 found that the previously approved project would also be consistent with the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and SCAG's Compass Growth Vision, 2004 RTP, and 1996 Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide. Since certification of FEIR 1054 and subsequent approval of the 2015 Addendum, the 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Plan (RTP/SCS) was adopted on April 7, 2016. The 2016 RTP/SCS provides a map to achieve a vision for the region in 2040. Specifically, the 2016 RTP/SCS encourages the region to "grow in more compact communities in existing urban areas, providing neighborhoods with efficient and plentiful public transit, abundant and safe opportunities to walk, bike and pursue other forms of active transportation, and preserving more of the region's remaining natural lands for people to enjoy." Although the project would not directly support achieving this vision through development of residential communities or circulation improvements, implementation of the project would support development in a pedestrian and transit -friendly environment and allow future hotel patrons easy access and mobility options to shopping, dining, and entertainment destinations. Therefore, project implementation would be consistent with the goals of the 2016 RTP/SCS. The consistency analysis in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum found that the previously approved project would also be consistent with the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan, which is unchanged from what was analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not vary substantially from the previously approved project; therefore, the consistency analysis for the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan as presented in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum would be applicable for the proposed project. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 51 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact, nor would it create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the land use and planning analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project to less than significant levels. The following measure from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Standard Condition SC 4.11-1 Prior to site plan approval, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning Division, for review and approval, project plans that comply with the Development Standards as set forth in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and Zoning Code. In addition, all site development shall be subject to all standard conditions of approval imposed by the City. 4.12 MINERAL RESOURCES 4.12.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Proiect Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 FEIR 1054 did not address mineral resources. The Initial Study prepared for the EIR indicated that the previously approved project would not result in loss of availability of a known mineral resource of value or a mineral resource recovery site. No impacts related to this environmental topic were anticipated as a result of previously approved project implementation, and no mitigation was required. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Proiect Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to the 2015 Addendum, the modified project area is located within the same development footprint analyzed in the FEIR 1054. Therefore, the 2015 Addendum concluded that conditions and uses on the three -acre site have not changed since certification of FEIR 1054; therefore, development of the modified project would not result in impacts to mineral resources. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 52 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 4.12.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The area proposed for development with the proposed project is located on the same development footprint analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Based on review of the proposed project site, conditions and uses on the three -acre site have not changed since certification of FEIR 1054; therefore, development of the proposed project would not result in impacts to mineral resources. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the mineral resources analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. 4.13 NOISE 4.13.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Proiect Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 FEIR 1054 concluded that, because the noise levels associated with construction of the previously approved project would be temporary and because construction noise during typical construction hours is exempt by the City of Costa Mesa (City) Noise Ordinance, no significant impact would occur. The City recognized that, even with compliance with the Noise Ordinance, construction noise impacts could be a nuisance to nearby land uses. A standard condition relative to truck routes and limiting the number of daily truck trips was included in the previously approved project, which ensured that a significant impact would not occur. FEIR 1054 concluded that typical construction and demolition activities would result in vibration in the immediate vicinity of the previously approved project site, and the impact would be less than significant. Additionally, long-term previously approved project -generated traffic noise to off-site receptors would be less than significant. The implementation of mitigation measures (MMs) relative to parking garage design, loading dock design and operations, and mechanical equipment siting would be required to reduce noise impacts from on-site operations to off-site land uses to a less than significant level. According to FEIR 1054, proposed residential units on the west side of the residential tower facing Avenue of the Arts, without mitigation, may be exposed to traffic noise resulting in interior levels in excess of 45 decibels (dBA) on the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Implementation of recommended mitigation would reduce noise impacts to a level that is considered less than significant. Additionally, noise impacts from John Wayne Airport would be less than significant R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 53 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 and the previously approved project would be consistent with the City's relevant General Plan goals and policies. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 The 2015 Addendum found that construction noise would be temporary and limited to the hours and activities specified as part of The Lakes — Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement (refer to revised SC 4.13-1). Construction noise impacts from the site could be a nuisance to nearby land uses, as stated in FEIR 1054, but would not be greater than described in FEIR 1054 because the type of construction activities, duration of construction, and types of equipment to be used would be similar as assumed in the analysis for FEIR 1054. Additionally, it was determined that shuttle traffic to and from the temporary parking area(s) would not create a significant impact. Construction traffic would result in less than significant impacts as long as the truck trips to and from the site do not exceed 200 trips (100 trips to the site plus 100 trips from the site) per day. According to the 2015 Addendum, the anticipated vibration impacts for the modified project would be the same as anticipated in FEIR 1054; that is, typical construction and demolition activities would result in vibration in the immediate vicinity of the modified project site. However, these vibration levels would not be considered excessive. Therefore, the impact was determined to be less than significant. Project -generated traffic noise increases to off-site receptors would be less than 0.1 dBA, would be the same or less than forecasted in FEIR 1054, and were determined to be less than significant. Long-term noise from on-site sources, including the parking structure, loading docks, and mechanical equipment (e.g., heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC] units), was determined to be less than significant with the incorporation of FEIR 1054 MMs 3.7-1, 3.7-2, and 3.7-3. According to the 2015 Addendum, future noise conditions at the residential tower would be similar to those described in FEIR 1054, and FEIR MM 3.7-4 would be incorporated into the modified project to ensure that interior noise levels at units facing Avenue of the Arts would not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. With this MM, the 2015 Addendum concluded that the impact would be less than significant. Additionally, aircraft noise was determined not to be significant at the modified project site. 4.13.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Existing Noise Environment The proposed project site is located in an area dominated by office, hotel, and retail land uses; the noise environment is characterized as urban. The site is within one mile of 1-405 and SR -55 and just over one mile from John Wayne Airport and SR -73. Vehicles traveling on the highways and the local roads are the primary sources of noise in the site vicinity. The traffic analysis prepared for the 2015-2035 General Plan indicates that traffic volumes on Avenue of the Arts are greater than those assumed in FEIR 1054 (Stantec 2014); therefore the existing noise levels at and near the proposed project site are estimated to be 1 to 2 dBA higher than those measured in 2007. Noise levels at the 3400 Avenue of the Arts Apartments (north of the proposed project site) and at the Lakes Pavilions (south of the proposed project site) ranged from hourly average noise R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 54 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 level (Leq) of 55 to 56 dBA at the time FEIR 1054 was prepared, and the current daytime hourly average noise levels are estimated at 56 to 58 dBA Leq. Updated traffic volume data for Bristol Street and Sunflower Avenue show current volumes are less than existing volumes used in the FEIR 1054 noise analysis (Costa Mesa 2010). The City's Municipal Code (Title 13, Chapter XIII, Noise Control, Section 13-279, Exceptions for Construction) prescribes the hours for construction noise as follows: The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to the following: (a) Emergency machinery, vehicles, or work; or (b) Construction equipment, vehicles, or work between the following approved hours, provided that all required permits for such construction, repair, or remodeling have been obtained from the appropriate city departments. Hours for Construction Activities 7:00 a.m. through 7:00 p.m. Mondays through Fridays 9:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m -T_ Saturdays Prohibited all hours T Sundays and the following specified federal holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day Additionally, terms of The Lakes – Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement further limit the hours and activities of construction on the proposed project site as follows: Monday through Friday Saturdays Hours for Construction Activities 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Construction -Related Impacts Construction activities limited to mobilization only All construction activities permitted Construction activities limited to mobilization only All construction activities permitted Construction activities limited to demobilization only Proposed project construction would be limited to the hours and activities specified as part of The Lakes – Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement (refer to revised SC 4.13-1). These limits are more restrictive than in SC 3.7-1 from FEIR 1054. As stated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, on-site demolition and construction noise represents a temporary increase in ambient noise levels. Noise generated by construction equipment—including trucks, graders, bulldozers, concrete mixers, and portable generators—can R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 55 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 reach levels ranging from 70 dBA to 95 dBA at a receptor located 50 feet from the source. At 200 feet, peak construction noise levels would range from 58 dBA to 83 dBA. At 400 feet, the peak noise levels would range from 52 dBA to 77 dBA. Note that these noise levels are based on worst- case conditions. Typically, noise levels near the site would be less than these conditions. Most of the proposed project grading and construction would use typical construction equipment with graders, scrapers, tractors, trucks, and loaders generating the greatest noise levels. No pile driving activities would be required. The nearest residences to construction activities are located to the north at approximately 40 feet from the nearest point of the proposed project site in 3400 Avenue of the Arts Apartments community. At this distance, peak demolition and construction noise levels could range between 72 dBA and 97 dBA at these residences. During peak activity periods nearest these homes, average noise levels from construction activities would be expected to exceed 85 dBA on a regular basis. The majority of the proposed project site is more than 100 feet from any one of these residences. Average construction noise levels at the nearest homes to the north would be expected to be in the high 70s dBA range. Construction noise impacts from the site could be a nuisance to nearby land uses, as stated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, but would not be greater than described in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. As discussed in Section 3.3, Project Description, the project would include shuttle trips to and from the temporary parking area(s) for hotel and restaurant guests and employees during construction of the parking garage. These trips would occur over a limited time (approximately 10 months), and the number of anticipated trips would be nominal and distributed throughout the day. Therefore, the temporary addition of shuttle traffic to the surrounding local roadways would not create a significant noise impact. As previously discussed, the traffic analysis for the 2015-2035 General Plan shows that existing traffic volume on Avenue of the Arts is 7,000 ADT compared to 5,000 ADT for the FEIR 1054 noise analysis. The FEIR 1054 noise analysis determined that if an additional 200 trucks travel on Avenue of the Arts during a 24-hour period, the traffic noise CNEL along the road would increase by 2.4 dBA. Because the current existing ADT is greater, the increase due to an additional 200 trucks would be less than 2.4 dBA CNEL. This is less than the 3 dBA significance threshold identified in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, and construction traffic would result in less than significant impacts as long as the truck trips to and from the site do not exceed 200 trips (100 trips to site plus 100 trips from the site) per day. The maximum intensity of truck trips is anticipated during excavation, with an estimated 1,936 round trips in 20 days or an average of 97 trips to the site plus 97 trips from the site per day. This truck trip rate is less than the limit stated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, and the limit from FEIR 1054 would be retained for the proposed project as identified in SC 3.7-2. Groundborne Vibration FEIR 1054 states, "Operation of heavy construction equipment can generate noticeable vibration in the immediate vicinity of the equipment. Vibration levels from most heavy construction equipment are typically not perceived as severe or annoying and drop off rapidly to an undetectable level over a short distance (approximately 10 to 20 feet)". The FEIR then concludes that typical construction and demolition activities would result in vibration in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project site. However, these vibration levels would not be considered excessive. The anticipated vibration impacts for the proposed project would be less than significant, which is consistent with what was anticipated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 56 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Long -Term Off -Site Noise Impacts Proposed Project -Generated Traffic Noise FEIR 1054 identified that long-range (2025) substantial cumulative traffic noise increases (greater than 3 dBA) would occur due to traffic growth along Avenue of the Arts south of Anton Boulevard, along Town Center Drive between Park Center Drive and Avenue of the Arts, and along Anton Boulevard east of Sakioka Drive. The project -generated contribution to each of these increases was indicated to be less than 0.1 dBA. The 2015-2035 General Plan EIR shows that the cumulative traffic noise increase (existing compared to 2035 General Plan buildout) on Anton Boulevard between Bristol and Sunflower would be 1.8 dBA. Neither Avenue of the Arts south of Anton Boulevard nor Town Center Drive between Park Center Drive and Avenue of the Arts is analyzed in the General Plan EIR noise analysis. It is noted that neither the General Plan EIR traffic analysis nor the General Plan EIR noise analysis identifies cumulative traffic noise increases of 3 dBA or more in the vicinity of the project site. As discussed in detail in Section 4.17, Traffic, the proposed project would result in an increase of 60 trips when compared to what was analyzed in FEIR 1054. Under a worst-case scenario, which is adding all of the project -generated traffic to the existing traffic, the noise level increase on Avenue of the Arts at the project site would be 0.5 dBA, which is not perceptible. This case was not analyzed in FEIR 1054 or the 2015 Addendum. The increase of 0.5 dBA on Avenue of the Arts at the project site is equal to the long-term noise level increase forecasted in FEIR 1054. Long-term project -generated traffic noise level increases on other roadway segments would be similar to the 0.1 dBA increases identified in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. All project - generated traffic noise increases would be less than significant. On -Site Activities The FEIR 1054 noise analysis stated that parking structure activity would not be a significant noise source. However, FEIR 1054 included MM 3.7-1 to ensure that all feasible sound attenuation in compliance with the Noise Ordinance has been incorporated into parking structure design. FEIR 1054 MM 3.7-1 would be retained for the proposed project as MM 4.13-1. FEIR 1054 identified potential noise impacts to the 3400 Avenue of the Arts apartment community's residences located adjacent to the previously approved project site on the north from loading dock operations and included MM 3.7-2 to require loading dock design and operations to comply with Noise Ordinance requirements. The proposed project would have a ground -level loading dock on the north side of the hotel tower with a similar potential noise impact. Therefore, FEIR 1054 MM 3.7-2 would be retained for the proposed project (as MM 4.13-2) to limit the impact to a less than significant level. The proposed project would also have a trash collection area adjacent to the loading dock. To ensure that trash collection and disposal operations would not cause a significant noise impact, MM 4.13-2 is modified to include trash collection and disposal operations. FEIR 1054 identified potential noise impacts to 3400 Avenue of the Arts apartment community's residences from mechanical equipment (e.g., heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC] units) and included MM 3.7-3 to require that previously approved project mechanical equipment installation comply with Noise Ordinance requirements. Final mechanical equipment specifications and locations have not been specified for the proposed project. Therefore, FEIR 1054 MM 3.7-3 would be retained for the proposed project (as MM 4.13-3) to limit the impact to a less than significant level. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 57 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 With incorporation of MMs 4.13-1, 4.13-2, and 4.13-3, impacts from proposed project noise sources to off-site receptors would be less than significant. Long -Term On -Site Noise Impacts FEIR 1054 shows that future noise generated by traffic on Avenue of the Arts is expected to reach 65 CNEL at the project site. The City General Plan Noise Element standard requires that interior noise levels in habitable rooms do not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. To ensure acceptable noise levels, FEIR 1054 MM 3.7-4 requires a noise study for all living units on the west side of the residential tower facing Avenue of the Arts. This report shall describe and quantify the noise sources impacting the building(s), the amount of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction provided by the design in the architectural plans, and any upgrades required to meet the interior noise standards. Future noise conditions at the proposed hotel tower are forecasted to be similar to those described in FEIR 1054, and FEIR MM 3.7-4 would be incorporated into the proposed project as MM 4.13-4. With this MM, the impact would be less than significant. Aircraft Noise Exposure The proposed project site is located slightly over one mile northwest of John Wayne Airport and is located outside the direct flight path. Exhibit 7 shows the 2013 annual noise contours for John Wayne Airport, and Exhibit 8, Projected Future (2026-2030) Aircraft Noise Contours for John Wayne Airport, shows the projected noise contours. Based on these exhibits, the proposed project site is outside the 60 CNEL aircraft noise contour and, as a result, aircraft noise would not be significant at the proposed project site. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the noise analysis provided in FEIR 1054 or the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential noise impacts associated with the previously approved projects to less than significant levels. The following measures from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Any modifications to the original measures are shown in strikethror rnh for deleted text and new inserted text is underlined. SC 4.13-1 was revised to reflect the conditions as stated in The Lakes — Costa Mesa Association Settlement Agreement. Standard Conditions SC 4.13-1 Thoity o� Mesa Alnico Orr) nGe exempts several Gategeries of noise ^UGC Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours and activities (with the exception of federal holidays): R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 58 Environmental Analysis -•-R S . `;''. 1 rte,. �' � -' , al '. � S lr '� lG ■:AAf �: P.f �� t`.-_, Fw �tll ... �F >7���� N* .: rte■ 4 AAI R ��� "' �-' it � � r- ry S i�•. ' + [ .-zr Ary_ v, . r ' 7 _ - . y♦K;�, `R s ti, p. �i � +K' l ��, � � �r.Y,,? �4►5_ -- '`a■i +Jre`'Y��. a / F`�r�� �-;" �rF fS+ �t*`"�" fir" �.:+k. g '*�'�" 1``-�"r` s r R*M 'OI ♦' w 3 •', ar 9:Wpo! ■ ♦1 i �^' 6 V ' � Ian I m ♦'F `� — �w'yy�, a�•.yH 5l r 5. ♦ �l`` 5,,: 'tom 73 Monday through Frida7:00 a.m. through 8:00 a.m. y, 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Saturdays 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. 3:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Construction activities limited to mobilization only All construction activities permitted Construction activities limited to mobilization only All construction activities permitted Construction activities limited to demobilization only 0 nGluding GenStrUGtieR aGtivities whirh take plaGe between the hours ef 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM, seven days a wee! Construction activities are prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. All noise-generatingconstruction activities should be limited to these hours. SC 4.13-2 The Applicant shall prepare a truck route plan for review and approval by the City of Costa Mesa Transportation Services Division prior to the approval of the construction access permit. The truck route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas, including Avenue of the Arts north of the project site and Sunflower Avenue. The total truck trips to the site shall not exceed 200 trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus 100 truck trips from the site). Mitigation Measures MM 4.13-1 The Applicant shall submit detailed plans for the parking structure prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit for the structure. Said plans shall be accompanied by an acoustical study prepared by a qualified Acoustical Consultant. The acoustical study shall demonstrate that all feasible sound attenuation in compliance with the Noise Ordinance has been incorporated into parking structure design, including but not limited to brushed driving surfaces (textured), limited openings oriented toward sensitive noise sources, etc. MM 4.13-2 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a detailed acoustical study using architectural plans shall be prepared by a qualified Acoustical Consultant and shall be submitted to the Planning Division addressing delivery truck/loading dock and trash disposal operations adjacent to residences. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the architectural plans for the delivery/truck loading dock/trash collection area to ensure compliance with the Noise Ordinance. MM 4.13-3 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a detailed acoustical study using architectural plans shall be prepared by a qualified Acoustical Consultant and shall be submitted to the Planning Division addressing mechanical equipment. This study shall address any mechanical equipment to be sited within 71 feet of off-site residences. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the architectural plans for mechanical equipment to ensure compliance with the Noise Ordinance. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 59 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MM 4.13-4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a detailed acoustical study using architectural plans shall be prepared by a qualified Acoustical Consultant and shall be submitted to the Planning Division for all living units on the west side of the hotel tower facing Avenue of the Arts. This report shall describe and quantify the noise sources impacting the building(s), the amount of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction provided by the design in the architectural plans, and any upgrades required to meet the interior noise standards (45 CNEL for residences). Noise standards shall be met with all doors and windows closed. Alternatively, the Applicant can show that based on the building location relative to the roadway and any intervening topography and structures that it meets the appropriate interior noise standard with open windows. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the architectural plans for the buildings and implemented with building construction. The person preparing the report shall, under the direction of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, perform an inspection of the project prior to or at the time of the framing inspection to certify that construction techniques comply with the recommendations within the acoustical analysis. Upon completion of the subject structures, field tests may be required by the Planning Division mer the PFEWioiORS of Title --2-5. 4.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING 4.14.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 As set forth in the Initial Study for FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would neither displace existing housing, nor would it displace people and necessitate the construction of replacement housing. At the time FEIR 1054 was certified, no permanent housing opportunities existed on the previously approved project site. According to FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would result in population growth as a direct consequence of its housing growth. It was determined that the previously approved project's estimated population of 300 people would represent approximately 2 percent of the total projected population increase in the City of Costa Mesa by 2035, which would not represent a significant impact. Therefore, it was concluded that the previously approved project's population growth is consistent with the population projections. The previously approved project's housing would be consistent with the Housing Element's effort to increase housing production to meet its fair share of regional housing needs, as required by State law. Additionally, the previously approved project would contribute toward achieving the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) housing construction target for Above -Moderate Income housing units and would provide housing opportunities within one of the region's employment centers. FEIR 1054 concluded that the previously approved project would not create a significant number of new, permanent employment opportunities. Rather, renovation of the existing hotel would potentially reduce the number of hotel employment positions from 96 to 80 (at a rate of 1 employee per 2.5 rooms). R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 60 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 FEIR 1054 concluded that the previously approved project would have no significant adverse impacts to population, housing, or employment, and the incremental contributions to cumulative population, housing, and employment impacts in the SCAG region would be less than significant. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to the 2015 Addendum, no new impacts associated with anticipated population, housing, and employment growth would occur with the modified project beyond what was previously identified in the FEIR 1054 analysis. Therefore, it was concluded that the impact would be less than significant. 4.14.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Development would occur within the same physical impact area as what was previously analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Consistent with the analysis presented in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, development of the proposed project would not displace any existing housing or people. The proposed project would not include development of dwelling units; therefore, the project would not result in a direct increase in population. The proposed project would retain the existing hotel with 238 rooms and construct a new 150 -room high-rise hotel tower, thereby potentially increasing the number of hotel employment positions from 96 to 156 (at a rate of 1 employee per 2.5 rooms). The generation of new employment positions has the potential to indirectly result in new households, thereby indirectly increasing population. For purposes of this analysis and consistent with what was assumed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, approximately 13.3 percent' of new hotel and motel employees would choose to relocate into the City of Costa Mesa; therefore, approximately 21 employees may move their residences to Costa Mesa, resulting in a need for 21 dwelling units. It is assumed that existing housing stock would accommodate the project -generated population increase. Assuming 1 employee per household and an average of 3.1 persons per household, the new households would result in 65 new residents. Consistent with the findings in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the increase in housing demand and population generation is well within the projections for the City and County. Therefore, no new impacts associated with anticipated population, housing, and employment growth would occur beyond what was previously identified. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the population and housing analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. 1 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (September 1994). R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 61 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 4.15 PUBLIC SERVICES 4.15.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Prosect Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 Police Protection As stated in FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would increase the population in the City of Costa Mesa. The Police Department indicated that the previously approved project would result in additional calls for service based on the increase in population and vehicle traffic to the area. However, the previously approved project would not impact the project area, and the same number of officers would be deployed to each area. Potential impacts related to police protection would be mitigated to less than significant levels and implementation of standard conditions related to building and site safety design recommendations from the Police Department and continued coordination with the Police Department would ensure adequate police protection services would be provided to the previously approved project site. Fire Protection As stated in FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would increase the City's population, resulting in an increase in service calls to the Fire Department. The Fire Department indicated that they had adequate resources to serve the previously approved project; however, an additional paramedic engine company with four additional personnel per shift was recommended for Fire Station 6. It was concluded that implementation of mitigation requiring payment of fees to fund a new paramedic engine would mitigate potential impacts to a less than significant level. Additionally, implementation of standard conditions and compliance with the recommendations of the "Standard Building and Fire Requirements for High -Rise Buildings" would ensure acceptable levels of fire safety and fire emergency response to the previously approved project. Schools According to FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would include 120 residential units. Based on student generation rates provided by the Newport Mesa Unified School District (NMUSD), the previously approved project would generate a total of 26 students. It was determined that the Project Applicant would be subject to payment of school impact fees (as provided for by State law) at the time of issuance of building permits for the Project which, according to Section 65998 of the California Government Code, would provide full and complete mitigation of the previously approved project's impacts on school facilities. Therefore, the potential impacts to school services would be considered less than significant and no additional mitigation measures would be required. Parks and Recreation According to FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would generate additional residents, which would increase the demand on recreational opportunities in the City. It was anticipated that residents of the previously approved project would use existing neighborhood and recreational facilities. FEIR 1054 concluded that the Project Applicant would be required to contribute funds to the Parks and Recreation Department in lieu of parkland dedication. Costa Mesa assesses a park impact fee based on the approved fee schedule at the time of Final Master Plan submittal. Park fees would enable the City to make improvements to existing parkland to serve the proposed R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 62 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 demand from new residents. Therefore, through payment of park fees, impacts on parks would be less than significant. Library Service According to FEIR 1054, the General Plan 2000 EIR identified less than significant impacts to library services because the libraries are operating over the Orange County Public Library (OCPL) standard for service and because the OCPL did not identify direct significant impacts on these facilities. Using this same approach, it was determined that the previously approved project would result in less than significant impacts on library services. However it was determined that the Project Applicant would be required to pay library impact fees if a program is established by the City. These fees would assist in funding library services in the City. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Resort No. 1054 Police Protection According to the 2015 Addendum, the modified project would result in an increased demand for police protection services resulting from an increase in population on the project site. However, the project would reduce the number of approved dwelling units for the site and would not introduce any land uses beyond what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054. With incorporation of the prescribed Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures, impacts to police protection services related to the modified project as analyzed in the 2015 Addendum would be consistent with those analyzed in FEIR 1054. Fire Protection According to the 2015 Addendum, the modified project would result in an increased demand for fire protection services resulting from an increase in population on the project site. However, the project would reduce the number of approved dwelling units for the site and would not introduce any land uses beyond what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054. With incorporation of the prescribed Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures, impacts to fire protection services related to the modified project as analyzed in the 2015 Addendum would be consistent with those analyzed in FEIR 1054. Schools According to the 2015 Addendum, the modified project would result in an increase in the number of students in the NMUSD resulting from an increase in population on the project site. However, the project would reduce the number of approved dwelling units for the site and would not introduce any land uses beyond what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054. With incorporation of the prescribed Standard Condition, impacts to schools related to the modified project as analyzed in the 2015 Addendum would be consistent with those analyzed in FEIR 1054. Parks and Recreation Implementation of the 2015 Addendum would result in an increased demand for parks and recreational amenities resulting from an increase in population on the project site. However, the project would reduce the number of approved dwelling units for the site and would not introduce any land uses beyond what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054. With incorporation of the prescribed Standard Condition, impacts to parks and recreation under the 2015 Addendum would be consistent with those analyzed in FEIR 1054. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 63 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Library Service According to the 2015 Addendum, the modified project would result in an increased demand for library service resulting from an increase in population on the project site. However, the project would reduce the number of approved dwelling units for the site and would not introduce any land uses beyond what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054. With incorporation of the prescribed Standard Condition, impacts to library service related to the modified project as analyzed in the 2015 Addendum would be consistent with those analyzed in FEIR 1054. 4.15.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Police and Fire Protection Consistent with the analysis in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the proposed project would result in an increased demand for police and fire protection service resulting from an increase in the number of visitors and employees to the project site in addition to an increase of vehicular traffic to the area. Therefore, although the demands for these services would be increased with the proposed project beyond existing conditions, with no direct increase in residential units, these impacts would be less than what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Schools No direct increase in student generation would result from project implementation because the project would function primarily as a visitor -serving use. While the project has the potential to indirectly increase the residential base of the City (as detailed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing), the number of potential new residents associated with the increase in employment positions would be minor and would be less than what was analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, therefore, related impacts to recreational facilities would be less than significant. Parks and Recreation No direct increase in demand for City parklands or recreational facilities would result from project implementation because the project would function primarily as a visitor -serving use. While the project has the potential to indirectly increase the residential base of the city (as detailed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing), the number of potential new residents associated with the increase in employment positions would be minor and would be less than what was analyzed in the 2015 Addendum, therefore, related impacts to recreational facilities would be less than significant. Although the demand for parks and recreation would be increased with the proposed project beyond existing conditions, with no direct increase in residential units, these impacts would be less than what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Library Service No direct increase in demand for library services would result from project implementation because the project would function primarily as a visitor -serving use. While the project has the potential to indirectly increase the residential base of the city (as detailed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing), the number of potential new residents associated with the increase in employment positions would be minor and would be less than what was analyzed in the 2015 Addendum, therefore, related impacts to library services would be less than significant. Although the demand for library services may increase with the proposed project beyond existing conditions, with no direct increase in residential units, these impacts would be less than what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 64 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact and it would not create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the public services analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project to less than significant levels. The following measures from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Standard Conditions Fire Protection SC 4.15-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit project designs and specifications for review and approval by the Fire Department with respect to compliance with all standard conditions for building design regarding public safety, including but not limited to, fire flow capacity, fire hydrant location, vehicular access, and sprinkler systems. SC 4.15-2 Emergency vehicle parking areas shall be designated within proximity to buildings to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. SC 4.15-3 Each project component shall provide sufficient capacity for fire flows required by the Fire Department. SC 4.15-4 Vehicular access shall be provided and maintained as serviceable, throughout construction, to all required fire hydrants. SC 4.15-5 All high-rise project developments shall be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system. SC 4.15-6 The Applicant shall comply with standard building and fire regulations for high-rise buildings to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal and Building Official. Police Protection SC 4.15-7 The Applicant shall comply with the Public Safety Radio System Coverage Ordinance (included in the standard building and fire regulations for high-rise buildings) to the satisfaction of the Police Chief. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 65 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 SC 4.15-8 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit project designs and specifications for review and receive approval by the Police Department with respect to compliance with all standard conditions for building design regarding public safety, including but not limited to, lighting, address numbers, building standards, live media cameras with direct feed, landscaping, and emergency vehicle parking. SC 4.15-9 Required building address numbers shall be readily apparent from the street, and rooftop building identification shall be readily apparent from police helicopters for emergency response agencies. Schools SC 4.15-10 The Applicant shall pay school impact fees. Library SC 4.15-12 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall pay a library services impact fee for the development costs for expanded or new library facilities pursuant to the Library Services Impact Fee Program, if such a program is established. Mitigation Measures MM 4.15-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall pay its pro rata share of a new, fully equipped paramedic engine, equal to $469.35 per unit to the Fire Department. MM 4.15-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a construction security service shall be established at the construction site. Initially, the service shall ensure that no unauthorized entry is made into the construction area. For the duration of each phase of construction, the Applicant shall provide sufficient on-site security personnel on a 24-hour, 7 -day -a -week basis to patrol all areas of construction and to prohibit unauthorized entry. MM 4.15-3 During project construction and operation, the Applicant shall ensure that private on-site security is provided. MM 4.15-4 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall pay pro rata shares of fees to the Police Department for the increased service capacity necessary to accommodate the development site, if such a police impact fee program is established. MM 4.15-5 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall comply with direct media feeding devices required by the Police Department for increased safety necessary to serve the development site, if such a police program is established. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 66 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 4.16 RECREATION 4.16.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 FEIR 1054 did not separately address recreation. As discussed in Section 4.15, Public Services, of FEIR 1054, the previously approved project would generate additional residents which would increase demand on recreational opportunities in the City. Although the previously approved project does not provide for on-site public parkland, it would include on-site recreational amenities such as a fitness room, swimming pool, and meditation garden, which are typical of high-rise residential developments. It can be anticipated that residents of the previously approved project would use existing neighborhood and recreational facilities. As discussed in FEIR 1054, the City has initiated a program focusing on the improvement and versatility of existing parks in order to better serve the community. The Project Applicant would be required to contribute funds to the Parks and Recreation Department in lieu of parkland dedication. The City assesses a park impact fee based on the approved fee schedule at the time of Final Master Plan submittal. Park fees would enable the City to make improvements to existing parkland to serve the proposed demand from new residents. Therefore, through payment of park fees, impacts on parks would be less than significant. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to the 2015 Addendum, the anticipated demand for recreation uses, parklands, and park facilities with the modified project was determined to be less than what was analyzed and approved as part of FEIR 1054 due to the reduction in residential units. Additionally, and consistent with the analysis provided in FEIR 1054, it was determined that the Project Applicant would be required to pay park impact fees prior to the approval of the final map by the City Council (refer to SC 4.15-11, in Section 4.15, Public Services). Therefore, it was concluded that no new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts compared to those analyzed in FEIR 1054 would occur. 4.16.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW No direct increase in demand for City recreational facilities would result from project implementation because the project would function primarily as a visitor -serving use. It is noted that the proposed project would provide on-site recreational amenities to serve future hotel patrons, therefore, the increase in visitors would not require new public recreational facilities. Additionally, while the project has the potential to indirectly increase the residential base of the city (as detailed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing), the number of potential new residents associated with the increase in employment positions would be minor and would be less than what was analyzed in the 2015 Addendum, therefore, related impacts to the need for construction of new recreational facilities or the deterioration of existing facilities would be less than significant. Although the demand for parks and recreation would be increased with the proposed project beyond existing conditions, with no direct increase in residential units, these impacts would be less than what was previously evaluated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 67 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the recreation analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. 4.17 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4.17.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to EIR 1054, the previously approved project would not result in any of the study area intersections exceeding the City of Costa Mesa standard of level of service (LOS) D under the short-range plus project condition. Furthermore, the previously approved project's contribution to the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) is between 0.01 and 0.02 and is not considered a substantial increase in traffic in the study area. Under long-range plus project conditions, all traffic study area intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS with the exception of Bristol Street at Sunflower Avenue which is projected to operate at LOS E in the PM peak hour. Under the thresholds of significance set forth in FEIR 1054, and assuming adherence with the identified standard conditions, the previously approved project does not contribute significant levels of traffic to this intersection, and no significant impacts were identified. FEIR 1054 also concluded that the previously approved project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 According to the 2015 Addendum, the modified project would generate more AM peak hour trips than the project approved under FEIR 1054; however, there would be a reduction in PM peak hour trips compared to the previously approved project and an overall reduction in trips per day. It was determined that the projected increase in AM peak hour trips would be considered nominal, and that the modified project would have no significant impact on the study intersections. In addition, it was determined that the driveway approach delay would be consistent with what was analyzed in FEIR 1054. It was determined that the trip generation, distribution, and impacts did not significantly change from FEIR 1054. With adherence with the identified Standard Conditions from FEIR 1054, the conclusions from the original analysis were determined to still be valid and the modified project was not expected to have a significant impact on the circulation system. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 68 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 4.17.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The following analysis is based on the 3350 Avenue of the Arts/Starwood Hotel Project Trip Generation Analysis and Driveway and Valet Service Queueing Analysis Summary (Trip Generation and Queuing Analysis), prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec 2016), which is included as Appendix D. A Traffic Study was prepared for the approved project in 2007. The Traffic Study analyzed project impacts at 15 local intersections under short-range and long-range conditions, and found that the approved project had no significant impact on the surrounding circulation system. The residential portion of the approved and entitled development as evaluated in FEIR 1054, including bar/lounge and retail uses, would generate a total of 1,191 daily trips. For purposes of this analysis, the approved use's daily trips (1,191) were converted to equivalent hotel rooms using an average daily traffic (ADT) trip rate for the hotel (6.66) derived by the City of Costa Mesa using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual rates as the basis and refined based on traffic counts of the current hotel's driveways, resulting in 179 equivalent hotel rooms. After subtracting the 38 hotel rooms that would have been removed as part of the approved project evaluated in FEIR 1054, the number of equivalent hotel rooms would be 141. Therefore, the residential, bar/lounge, and retail portions of the previously approved project as evaluated in FEIR 1054 would have generated the same amount of vehicular trips as 141 hotel rooms. As shown in Table 10, the proposed project would expand the hotel by 150 hotel rooms, resulting in a net increase of 9 hotel rooms and 60 daily trips. TABLE 10 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Land Use Units ADT Approved 2007 Project Condo 120 du 806 Retail 1.74 TSF 75 Bar/Lounge 3.45 TSF 310 Total 1,191 Approved Hotel Roomsa (Equivalent) 179 Rooms Approved 2007 Project — Hotel Room Reduction -38 Rooms Total Approved Rooms (Equivalent) 141 Rooms Proposed Hotel Expansion 150 Rooms Net Change — Proposed vs. Approved 9 Rooms 60 Trip Rate Business Hotel' Room 6.66 ADT: average daily traffic; du: dwelling units; TSF: thousand square feet. Numbers may not add due to rounding. a Total Approved 2007 EIR Traffic Study ADT divided by hotel ADT rate (1,191/6.66). b Source: City of Costa Mesa — derived based on ITE Trip Generation Manual data and driveway counts of existing hotel. Source: Stantec 2016. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 69 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 According to the Trip Generation and Queuing Analysis, the distribution of these additional 60 daily trips would not significantly impact any of the 15 local intersections under either a short- or long-range condition. Therefore, no new significant impacts or increase in a previously identified significant impact related to traffic would occur. Driveway and Valet Service Queuing Analysis Visitors of the hotel would have an option to valet their vehicle or self -park. Those accessing the self -park facility would continue on Avenue of the Arts, past the hotel driveway and turn right at the traffic circle and access the parking structure entry at the rear of the hotel. Those who use the valet service would use the driveway from Avenue of the Arts. A queue is formed when arrivals wait at the valet station for service. Therefore, this analysis uses a five-minute vehicle demand during the highest peak hour (highest of AM and PM peak hour) at the hotel driveway to estimate the arrival rate of vehicles and the adequate service rate needed for the valet to process the vehicles in order to accommodate the demand. The valet station and guest drop-off is located in front of the hotel lobby. After processing the vehicle (i.e., the valet provides a ticket to the guest), the valet would drive the vehicle out of the driveway, make a right onto Avenue of the Arts, turn right at the traffic circle and access the valet parking through the parking structure entry in the rear of the hotel. For pickup service, the valet would utilize the "valet exit only" ramp located inside the parking structure. The ramp provides a direct connection from the valet parking inside the structure to the front of the hotel driveway. Based on the assumptions and queuing formulas detailed in the Trip Generation and Queuing Analysis it was determined that the proposed driveway and valet layout would be adequate with a minimum of two valets at the valet station at any given time to process valet customers. Note that the total number of valets on duty would depend on the time needed to move the vehicles to and from the parking structure such that a minimum of two valets are processing customers at the valet station at any given time. For special events, valet staffing would be determined by the hotel based on the anticipated demand. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the transportation and traffic resources analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes Standard Conditions to ensure that potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project would be less than significant. The following Standard Conditions from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 70 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 Standard Conditions SC 4.17-1 The Applicant shall be responsible for the payment of fees in accordance with the Traffic Impact Fee program. SC 4.17-2 The Applicant shall be responsible for the payment of fees in accordance with the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Ordinance. Fees shall be paid to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. SC 4.17-3 The Applicant shall be responsible for complying with the Transportation Demand Ordinance. 4.18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 4.18.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report No. 1054 Water According to FEIR 1054, the previously approved project site is located within the service area of the Mesa Consolidated Water District (now known as the Mesa Water District). It was determined that the previously approved project would have an average daily demand of 60 gallons per minute (gpm), which would represent an increase in the average daily demand for domestic water by 19 gpm over existing conditions. FEIR 1054 also concluded that, because the existing Wyndham Hotel is currently served by Mesa Water District facilities located in the previously approved project area, existing water facilities would adequately serve the previously approved project. Additionally, the FEIR concluded that existing and proposed infrastructure and facilities would accommodate the anticipated fire flow requirements. According to FEIR 1054, a water supply assessment was not required in accordance with the SB 610 definition of a "project' or a "large-scale development' pursuant to the criteria identified in Section 10912 of the California Water Code. FEIR 1054 concluded that adequate water supplies would be available from the Water District to serve the previously approved project, including fire flow requirements (as set forth in the California Fire Code) without expanding existing entitlements. Installation of water connections and distribution lines would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified for construction of the previously approved project, as addressed in FEIR 1054. Wastewater The previously approved project site is served by the Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD) collection system via a manhole at the southwestern corner of the site. After development of the previously approved project, all wastewater discharge from the hotel would continue to discharge at this manhole (south of Reach 6). It was also determined as part of FEIR 1054 that the anticipated wastewater flow from the hotel facility would be less than the existing condition due to the reduction in room count. As discussed in FEIR 1054, approximately 30,394 gallons per day (gpd) of wastewater would be generated from the high-rise tower, bar/lounge, and retail uses associated with the previously approved project and would enter the wastewater system via a manhole south of Reach 7, which is located at the northeastern corner of the site. Additionally, existing infrastructure would R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 71 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 adequately accommodate the previously approved project. Installation of wastewater connections and lines would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified for construction of the previously approved project, as addressed in FEIR 1054. Solid Waste Solid waste generated at the previously approved project site is transported to and disposed of at an OC Waste & Recycling landfill facility. According to FEIR 1054, demolition and construction activities associated with the previously approved project would require removal of demolition and construction debris; site preparation and excavation for the subterranean garages, where proposed, would generate soils and earth materials. As stated in FEIR 1054, the Project Applicant would be required to prepare a Haul Route Plan and a Construction Soils Reduction Plan. Additionally, development of the residential component of the previously approved project would generate approximately 1,467.6 pounds per day or 267.8 gross tons of solid waste annually. However, according to FEIR 1054, OC Waste & Recycling indicated that adequate capacity was available in the Orange County landfill system to accommodate the previously approved project and no significant impacts related to landfill capacity would result from implementation of the previously approved project. Electricity Electrical demand at the previously approved project site is served by Southern California Edison (SCE). According to FEIR 1054, electrical service for the previously approved project would be provided via connections to existing off-site and on-site SCE electrical lines located in the area, and the Project Applicant would be required to install additional conduits or other equipment to connect to the existing SCE facilities. It was also determined that the previously approved project would comply with California energy conservation requirements specified in the California Administrative Code (Titles 24 and 25). Additionally, installation of electrical connections and lines would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified for construction of the previously approved project, as addressed in FEIR 1054. No significant impacts were identified related to electrical services or facilities. Natural Gas According to FEIR 1054, natural gas service to the previously approved project site would be provided via connections to existing Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) facilities located in the area. It was also determined that the previously approved project would comply with California energy conservation requirements specified in the California Administrative Code (Titles 24 and 25). Additionally, installation of natural gas connections and lines would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified for construction of the previously approved project, as addressed in FEIR 1054. No significant impacts were identified related to natural gas services or facilities. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 72 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FEIR 1054 Cable Television According to FEIR 1054, continued service to the previously approved project site could be provided without an adverse impact to Time Warner Cable's ability to provide telecommunications service in the area. Installation of on-site cable television conduits would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified for construction of the previously approved project, as addressed in FEIR 1054. No significant impact was identified related to television service, reception, or systems. Telephone Service According to FEIR 1054, service to the previously approved project could be provided without any adverse impact to AT&T's ability to provide communication services in the area. Installation of on-site telephone conduits would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified for construction of the previously approved project, as addressed in FEIR 1054. No significant impact was identified related to telephone service or systems. 2015 Addendum to the Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final Environmental Imaact Resort No. 1054 Water According to the 2015 Addendum, the demand on water service would be similar to what was analyzed and approved as part of FEIR 1054. It was determined that the existing hotel is being served adequately by Mesa Water District and would continue to be served in the future. It was also determined that the water demand would be reduced compared to FEIR 1054. Additionally, the existing and proposed infrastructure analyzed under FEIR 1054 would be adequate to accommodate the anticipated water demand under the 2015 Addendum. The 2015 Addendum did not identify any significant impacts related to water supply and water infrastructure. Wastewater According to the 2015 Addendum, demand for wastewater service associated with the modified project would be similar to what was analyzed and approved as part of FEIR 1054. It was determined that the modified project would generate less wastewater than previously analyzed and no new impacts would occur. The 2015 Addendum did not identify any significant impacts related to wastewater and found the impacts to be consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054. Solid Waste Consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054, the modified project was determined to generate additional solid waste during construction and operation of the proposed project. However, the demand on solid waste service would be similar to what was analyzed and approved as part of FEIR 1054 because the land uses would be consistent for both the modified project and the project evaluated in FEIR 1054. In addition, it was determined that the Orange County landfill system would be able to accommodate solid waste generated by the modified project. The 2015 Addendum did not identify any significant impacts related to solid waste utilities and found the impacts to be consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 73 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Electricity According to the 2015 Addendum, installation of on-site electrical facilities would occur during project construction and would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified in FEIR 1054. Additionally, the demand on electricity would be consistent with what was analyzed in FEIR 1054. No significant impacts were identified related to electrical services or facilities. Natural Gas According to the 2015 Addendum, installation of on-site natural gas facilities would occur during project construction and would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified in FEIR 1054. Additionally, the demand on electricity would be consistent with what was analyzed in FEIR 1054. No significant impacts were identified related to natural gas services or facilities. Cable Television According to the 2015 Addendum, installation of on-site cable television conduits would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified for construction of the project under FEIR 1054. No significant impacts were identified related to television service, reception, or systems. Telephone Service According to the 2015 Addendum, installation of on-site telephone conduits would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified for construction of the project under FEIR 1054. No significant impacts were identified related to telephone service or systems. 4.18.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Water The existing hotel is currently being served adequately by Mesa Water District and would continue to be served in the future. The previously approved 120 -dwelling unit residential tower was previously analyzed in FEIR 1054 based on a water demand factor of 250 gpd per unit used in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, which was derived from the analysis provided for the North Costa Mesa High -Rise Residential Projects Final Program EIR No. 1052, which was certified in 2006, resulting in an anticipated water demand of 36,000 gpd. Under the currently proposed project and based on the 2006 water demand factor of 300 gpd per hotel room, the water demand for the hotel tower would be increased to 45,000 gpd for the 150 hotel rooms. It is noted that the 2006 water demand factor is used to maintain consistency between the current analysis and that which was presented in FEIR 1054 and represents a conservative demand factor. Based on coordination with Mesa Water District, the proposed project could be adequately served through connection to existing infrastructure and based on Mesa Water District's available water supply (Mesa Water District 2016). Additionally, water infrastructure is also sized based on fire flow requirements. Because the proposed project would involve construction of a similarly sized building to what was analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, it is assumed that fire flow requirements would be the same as with the proposed project (i.e., 4,000 gpm). Therefore, consistent with the analysis in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, existing and proposed infrastructure would be adequate to accommodate the anticipated water demand associated with the proposed project. Additionally, installation of on-site water lines would occur during proposed project construction and would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified in FEIR 1054 because the infrastructure installation would occur within the same physical impact area. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 74 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Further, it should be noted that the demand factors used for this analysis are conservative due to a variety of water efficiency requirements that have been introduced as standard requirements for new construction since certification of the North Costa Mesa High -Rise Residential Projects Final Program EIR No. 1052 and FEIR 1054. Therefore, it can be assumed that the actual water demand would be less than the 45,000-gpd demand that was calculated. With implementation of applicable Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures from FEIR 1054 (identified below), the proposed project would not create a new significant impact and would not create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to water supply and water infrastructure. Wastewater The proposed project would continue to be served by the Costa Mesa Sanitation District for wastewater service. The anticipated wastewater flow from the hotel facility would be the same as existing conditions. Based on generation rates used in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the proposed hotel tower would generate approximately 24,655 gpd of wastewater (22,500 gpd for hotel rooms, 1,823 gpd bar/lounge, and 332 gpd for retail). This represents a reduction in wastewater generation when compared to 30,394 gpd for the proposed high-rise residential tower (25,500 gpd for the condominium units, 4,720 gpd for the bar/lounge, and 174 gpd for retail) in FEIR 1054. Therefore, because the proposed project would generate less wastewater than previously analyzed, no new impacts would occur. Additionally, installation of on-site wastewater lines would occur during proposed project construction and would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum because the infrastructure installation would occur within the same physical impact area. Consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the existing infrastructure could accommodate the proposed project, and a significant impact would not occur. With implementation of applicable Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures from FEIR 1054 (as identified below), the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to utilities. Solid Waste Consistent with the findings of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, the proposed project would generate solid waste during construction and operation of the proposed project. The proposed project would develop the proposed project site with land uses similar to those previously evaluated as part of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Therefore, the demand on solid waste service would be similar to what was analyzed and approved as part of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would continue to be served by the County of Orange for solid waste disposal service. According to OC Waste & Recycling, the Orange County landfill system would be able to accommodate solid waste generated by the proposed project (Arnau 2016). With implementation of applicable Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures from FEIR 1054, identified below, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to utilities. Electricity and Natural Gas Installation of on-site electrical and natural gas facilities would occur during proposed project construction and would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum because the infrastructure installation would occur within the same physical impact area. The proposed project would develop land uses similar to those previously evaluated as part of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Therefore, the demand on electricity and natural gas would be similar to what was analyzed and approved as part of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would continue to be served by SCE for R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 75 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 electricity and the Southern California Gas Company for natural gas service. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact, nor would it create a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to utilities. Cable Television and Telephone Service Installation of on-site cable television and telephone conduits would occur during proposed project construction and would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those identified in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would develop the site with land uses similar to those previously evaluated as part of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Therefore, the demand on cable television and telephone service would be similar to what was analyzed and approved as part of FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would continue to be served by AT&T for telephone service and Time Warner Cable for cable television service. With implementation of applicable Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures from FEIR 1054 (as identified below), the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to utilities. Conclusion The impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts identified for the previously approved projects analyzed in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, or (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible; or (4) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the utilities and services systems analysis provided in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. Mitigation Program FEIR 1054's mitigation program includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the Starwood Tribute Hotel project to less than significant levels. The following measures from FEIR 1054 would also be applicable to the proposed project. Any modifications to the original measures are shown in stFikethro gh for deleted text and new inserted text is underlined. It should be noted that modifications to PDF 4.18-1 are proposed based on new and emerging technologies since the certification of FEIR 1054 and would be consistent with the intent of PDF 4.18-1 as stated in FEIR 1054. Project Design Feature PDF 4.18-1 The project assumes the implementation of the following energy conservation actions: • The use of drought tolerant planting • Reduced water consumption • Optimize energy performance beyond Title 24 • Compliance with ASHRAE 55-1992/2004 R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 76 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 • Storage and collection of recyclables • Construction waste management to salvage and recycle • Use of recycled building materials • Use of low -emitting materials • Use of locally manufactured materials • Use of carbon dioxide monitoring • Use of indeer air quality management plan during GenStFUGtien • Minimum 50 percent drought tolerant planting to reduce water consumption • Low flow drip irrigation system to mitigate water runoff and water loss • Smart irrigation controllers to alter irrigation timing and flow due to weather and wind patterns • /areas of popiigr S rgnnrete to absorb storm anal irrigation water nrngff • Minimal use of turf Use turf block in turf areas to help with drainage • Rainwater GE)IIentigp system fnr irriga}inn roe eco • Using bioswale planters on the pool deck to filter/store rain water • Salt water pool minimal use Of nhominals • Selar heating fnr. 6Wimm,irr npgglc • Alte'rnatiye PueliRg FaGilitieS Park!Rggarn�nohave —electFiG vehicle ronharging statieRS • GreeR roof planting at top of residential tewer betweeR monks to nollont storm waterUse of shared parking to reduce parking footprint • Sustainable site erosion and sediment control for construction activities • Light pollution reduction — minimal use of uplighting • Indoor Air Quality strategies • Sustainable -life -cycle impacts • Enhanced Daylighting / Views for inhabitants • Enhanced Acoustics design for inhabitants Standard Conditions Please refer to SC 4.13-2 in Section 4.13, Noise, regarding the requirement for a haul route plan. SC 4.18-1 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate to the Public Services Department that all construction waste generated on site would be recycled where feasible as the first choice of disposal method, leaving the option of landfill disposal as a last alternative. SC 4.18-2 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall submit grading plans to the Development Services Department that reflect the undergrounding of utilities serving the proposed project site. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 77 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 SC 4.18-3 Prior to the issuance of demolition/grading permits, the Applicant shall coordinate with Southern California Edison to determine the exact location of all underground and overhead electrical facilities. All electrical facilities and associated structures that will remain on the project site shall be protected from damage by the Applicant. SC 4.18-4 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall coordinate with the Southern California Gas Company to determine exact locations of all underground natural gas facilities. The Applicant shall ensure that all remaining gas pipelines and associated structures on the project site shall be protected from damage. SC 4.18-5 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall coordinate with Time Warner Cable to determine exact locations of all underground cable facilities. The Applicant shall ensure that all remaining cable lines and associated structures on the project site shall be protected from damage. SC 4.18-6 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall coordinate with AT&T California to determine exact locations of all underground telephone facilities. The Applicant shall ensure that all remaining telephone lines and associated structures on the project site shall be protected from damage. Mitigation Measure MM 4.18-1 Prior to the initiation of project grading, the Applicant shall ensure that all existing utilities shall be relocated, abandoned, and removed, rerouted, or protected in coordination with the Applicant and affected utility companies. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 78 Environmental Analysis Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 SECTION 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the analysis provided in this Addendum, there is sufficient evidence in the record to determine that (1) the proposed project does not represent a substantial change from the previously approved project evaluated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum; (2) there are no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken; and (3) there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time FEIR 1054 was certified as complete. The proposed project would not have any new or substantially more severe impacts than what was evaluated in FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum. There are no new Mitigation Measures that were not adopted at the time the FEIR was certified that would further reduce project impacts. FEIR 1054 and the 2015 Addendum, when considered in conjunction with this Addendum, provides adequate documentation pursuant to the CEQA for the Starwood Tribute Hotel project. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 79 Conclusions Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 This page intentionally left blank R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 80 Conclusions Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 SECTION 6.0 REFERENCES Arnau, J. 2016 (July 13). Personal Communication. Email from J. Arnau (Orange County Waste and Recycling) and M. Larum (BonTerra Psomas). California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2016 (May 4). Ambient Air Quality Standards. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aags2.pdf. 2015a (April 17, last reviewed). Air Quality Standards and Area Designations. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/desig.htm. 2015b (June 30). California Greenhouse Gas Inventory - 2015 Edition). Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm 2014a (November 7, last reviewed). Board Meetings. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/board/meetings.htm#future. 2014 (February 25). Executive Order R-14-001: Relating to 2013 Amendments to Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2013/areal 3/area13eo. pdf. 2014c (March 24, last updated). California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000-2012 by Category, as Defined in the 2008 Scoping Plan. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/tables/ghg_inventory_scopingplan_00-12_2014- 03-24.pdf. . 2014d (February 25). Executive Order R-14-001: Relating to 2013 Amendments to Area Designations for State Ambient Air Quality Standards. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2013/areal 3/area13eo. pdf. California Building Standards Commission (CBSC). 2013 (July). California 2013 Green Building Standards Code, CALGreen, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 11. Sacramento, CA: CBSC. http://www.ecodes.biz/ecodes_support/Free_Resources/ 2013California/l3Green/13Green main.html. California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resources Protection. 2012. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) Farmland Map: Orange County, California. Sacramento: FMMP. California Department of Conservation, Office of Land Conservation (OLC). 1997. California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model: Instruction Manual. Sacramento, CA: OLC. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dIrp/Pages/qh_lesa.aspx. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2016 (March 16, last update). List of Eligible and Officially Designated State Scenic Highways. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/l 6_livability/scenic_highways/scenic_hwy.htm. California Office of Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. (COOL). 2015 (April 29). Governor Brown Establishes Most Ambitious Greenhouse Gas Reduction Target in North America. Sacramento CA: COOG. https://www.gov.ca.gov/news.php?id=18938. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 81 References Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development v. City of San Diego (2011) 196 Cal. App. 41" 515, 531-532 Costa Mesa, City of (Costa Mesa). 2016 (March 4). 2015-2035 Draft General Plan. Costa Mesa, CA: http://www.costamesaca.gov/index.aspx?page=1994. 2010 (fall). Traffic Volume Map, City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, California, 24 Hour (both directions) (ADT Map). Costa Mesa, CA: the City. http://www.costamesaca.gov/index.aspx?page=1162. 2008 (January). Wyndham Boutique Hotel/High-Rise Residential Project Final EIR No. 1054 (SCH No. 2007011125). Costa Mesa, CA: the City. 2002 (January, adopted). City of Costa Mesa 2000 General Plan. Costa Mesa, CA: the City. 1994 (July, adopted). North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. Costa Mesa, CA: the City. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). 2016 (July 12). The EDR Radius MapTm Report with GeoCheck®: Starwood Tribute Hotel Project, 3350 Avenue of the Arts, Costa Mesa, California 92626 (Inquiry Number 4671365.2s). Milford, CT: EDR (Appendix C). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. IPCC. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wgl/ Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers (LLG). 2016 (April 7). Parking Demand Analysis for the Proposed 3550 Avenue of the Arts Hotel Project, Costa Mesa, California. Irvine, CA: LLG. Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) 549 U.S. 497 Orange, County of. 2014 (May). Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 617, John Wayne Airport Settlement Agreement Amendment. Costa Mesa, CA: the County. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2016. 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air- plans/air-quality-management-plans/2016-air-quality-management-plan/factsheet-2016- agmp.pdf?sfvrsn=2. 2013 (updated February). Final 2012 AQMP (February 2013). Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.agmd.gov/ home/library/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan/final- 2012-air-quality-management-plan. 2013b. California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod)TM Version 2013.2.2 (Developed by Environ International Corporation in Collaboration with SCAQMD and other California Air Districts). Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. 2011 (March). SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality- significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 82 References Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 2010 (September 28). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #15 (slide presentation). Diamond Bar, CA. SCAQMD. http://www.agmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/GHG/ 2010/sept28mtg/ghgmtgl5-web.pdf. 2009 (October). Mass Rate Localized Significance Thresholds Look -Up Tables. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/appendix-c-mass-rate-Ist-look- u p -tables. pdf?sfvrsn=2. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Thresholds. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. 1976 (May, as amended through 2005). Rule 403: Fugitive Dust. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule- 403.pdf?sfvrsn=4. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2012 (April). 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Transportation Conformity Analysis Appendix. Los Angeles: SCAG. 2011 (December). Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, Southern California Association of Governments 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Los Angeles, CA: SCAG Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec). 2016 (August 1). 3350 Avenue of the Arts/Starwood Hotel Project Trip Generation Analysis and Driveway and Valet Service Queueing Analysis Summary. Irvine, CA: Stantec. 2016b (February 18). Memorandum from Daryl Zerfass to Laura Stetson. Reference: Costa Mesa Existing Conditions Versus Proposed General Plan Traffic Analysis. (Appendix C to Costa Mesa Draft 2015-2035 General Plan final Draft). http://www.costamesaca.gov/index.aspx?page=1994 United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2016 (April 18, last updated). U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report: 1990-2014). Washington, D.C.: USEPA. https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/usinventoryreport.html. 2015a (As of October 1). The Green Book Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. Washington D.C.: USEPA. http://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/. 2014a (accessed December 30). Ground -level Ozone. Regulatory Actions. http://www.epa.gov/glo/actions.html#content. 2014b (August 15). Hazardous Waste Manifest System. Washington, D.C.: USEPA. http://www.epa.gov/waste/hazard/transportation/ manifest/index.htm. 2014c (April). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2012. Washington, D.C.: USEPA. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/ usinventoryreport.html. 2007 (April 24, last updated). EPA Map of Radon Zones. Washington, D.C.: USEPA. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 83 References Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 World Resources Institute (WRI). 2016. Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) version 9.0. Washington, D.C.: WRI. http://cait.wri.org/. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx 84 References APPENDIX A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project The approximately three -acre Starwood Tribute Hotel project site is located at 3350 Avenue of the Arts within the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan area of the City of Costa Mesa in Orange County, California. The project site is generally bound by Avenue of the Arts to the west; 3400 Avenue of the Arts apartment community to the north and northeast; and The Lakes Pavilions retail center to the south and southeast. The proposed project would retain the existing 238 -room hotel and proposes to construct a new 15 -story, 150 -room high-rise hotel tower to serve as an expansion of the Avenue of the Arts Hotel (238 rooms existing, 388 rooms proposed). The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that all public agencies establish monitoring and/or reporting procedures for mitigation measures (MMs) adopted as conditions of approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant project impacts. Specifically, §21081.6(a)(1) states: The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. CEQA Guidelines §15097 provides clarification of mitigation monitoring and reporting requirements and guidance to local lead agencies on implementing strategies. The reporting or monitoring program must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. Mitigation measures have been drafted to meet the requirements of Public Resources Code §21081.6 as fully enforceable monitoring programs. The MMRP defines the following for each mitigation measure: Timeframe. In each case, a time for performance of the mitigation measure, or review of evidence that mitigation has taken place, is provided. The performance points selected are designed to ensure that impact -related components of project implementation do not proceed without establishing that the mitigation is implemented or assured. 2. Responsible Party. In each case, unless where otherwise indicated, the Applicant/Developer is the Responsible Party for implementing the mitigation. The City will monitor the performance and implementation of the mitigation measures. To guarantee that the mitigation measure will not be inadvertently overlooked, the supervising public official is the official who grants the permit or authorization called for in the performance. 3. Definition of Mitigation. In each case (except where a mitigation measure, such as a geotechnical report, is a well-known procedure or term of art), the mitigation measure contains the criteria for mitigation, either in the form of adherence to certain adopted regulations or identification of the steps to be taken in mitigation. Matrix Orientation The following matrix lists all mitigation measures, standard conditions of approval, and project design features from the Addendum to Final EIR 1054 referenced above. The matrix also RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 identifies the applicable permit, the required timing, and responsible parties for both implementation and monitoring of standard conditions and mitigation measures. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Stanwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed Aesthetics Standard Conditions of Approval SC 3.8-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit an Electrical Engineer's Prior to issuance of Applicant; photometric survey to be approved by the Planning Division in order to assure that minimum building permits Planning security lighting requirements are met and to minimize light and glare to residents. Division SC 3.8-2 All exterior light standards and fixtures will be shielded to prevent light spill to further reduce Prior to issuance of Applicant; potential impacts. Certificate of Planning Occupancy Division SC 3.8-3 The intensity and location of lights on buildings shall be limited to minimize nighttime light and Prior to issuance of Applicant; glare to residents and shall be subject to the Development Services Director's approval. Certificate of Development Occupancy Services Director SC 3.8-4 The Lighting Plan shall demonstrate compliance with the following: (1) All site lighting fixtures Prior to issuance of Applicant; shall be provided with a flat glass lens; (2) Photometric calculations shall indicate the effect of the building permits Planning flat glass lens fixture efficiency; (3) Lighting design and layout shall limit spill light to no more than Division 0.5 foot-candle at the property line of the surrounding neighbors, consistent with the level of lighting that is determined necessary for safety and security purposes on site. SC 3.8-5 Architectural features and roofs shall be appropriately finished with non -reflective materials in Prior to issuance of Applicant; order to reduce glare and reflection. Structures shall use low reflective glass and building building permits Planning materials to minimize daytime glare to the fullest extent possible. Division SC 3.8-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit building plans for the proposed Prior to issuance of Applicant; project, to be approved by the Planning Division, which incorporate the use of non -reflective building permits Planning building materials to minimize light and glare impacts. Division SC 3.8-7 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit a Final Landscape Plan, Prior to issuance of Applicant; consistent with the landscape standards, for each development component to be approved by the building permits Planning Planning Division. Division Air Quality Standard Conditions of Approval SC 3.6-1 During construction of the proposed project, the Property Owner/Developer and its Contractors During all Applicant; shall be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403, which shall assist in reducing construction phases Planning short-term air pollutant emissions. SCAQMD Rule 402 requires that air pollutant emissions not be Division a nuisance off site. SCAQMD Rule 403 (Tables 1, 2, and 3 of Rule 403) requires that fugitive dust be controlled with the best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. This requirement shall be included as notes on the Contractor Specifications. RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed Mitigation Measures MM 3.6-1 During construction and grading activities, the Applicant shall comply with measures set forth in During all Applicant; the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to ensure that airborne dust is kept to a construction phases Planning minimum. Division MM 3.6-2 Prior to commencement of construction activities, the Applicant shall identify to the Development Prior to Applicant; Services Department, a Construction -Relations Officer to act as a community liaison concerning commencement of Development on-site activity, including resolution of issues related to dust generation from grading/paving construction Services activities. Department MM 3.6-3 Prior to approval of grading plans, the Applicant shall include the following notes on the Contractor Prior to approval of Applicant; Specifications submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Department: grading plans Development "To reduce construction equipment emissions, the following measures shall be implemented Services Department when feasible: • Use low -emission mobile construction equipment. The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with California Air Resources Board (CARB) requirements for heavy construction equipment. • Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned. • Use low sulfur fuel for stationary construction equipment. This is required by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rules 431.1 and 431.2. • Use existing power sources (i.e., power poles) when available. This measure would minimize the use of higher polluting gas or diesel generators. • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes. Construction should be planned so that lane closures on existing streets are kept to a minimum. • Schedule construction operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours to the greatest extent practicable. • Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities (the plan may include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation and satellite parking areas with a shuttle service). MM 3.6-4 Reduce reactive organic gas (ROG) emissions from painting activities. The following measures Prior to issuance of Applicant; should be implemented when feasible. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant first building permit Development shall provide evidence to the Development Services Development that the following measures Services shall be incorporated into project construction to the greatest extent feasible and the following Department measures should be provided as notes on the Contractor Specifications: • The project shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113, which limits the ROG content of architectural coatings used in the South Coast Air Basin or shall allow the averaging of such coatings, as specified, so that actual emissions do not exceed the allowable emissions if all the averaged coatings had complied with the specified limits. RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed • Use high transfer efficiency painting methods such as HVLP (High Volume Low Pressure) sprayers and brushes/rollers where possible. Aviation Safety Project Design Features PDF 3.10-1 The proposed high-rise hotel tower has been designed to not exceed the established circling Prior to issuance of Applicant; minimums floor for John Wayne Airport (JWA) of 304 feet above mean sea level (msl). first building permit Planning Division Standard Conditions of Approval SC 3.10-1 Prior to final master plan approval, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Costa Mesa, a Federal Prior to final master Applicant; Aviation Administration (FAA) Determination of No Hazard to air navigation. If the FAA requires plan approval Planning conditions for the finding of no hazard to air navigation, such as installation of roof -top obstruction Division lighting, said conditions shall be placed as conditions of approval on the final master plan. SC 3.10-2 In the event a proposed high-rise building is determined to be a hazard to air navigation by the Prior to final master Applicant; FAA, the building design shall be appropriately modified prior to issuance of building permits so plan approval Planning that an FAA Determination of No Hazard to air navigation can be obtained. Division SC 3.10-3 The FAA No Hazard Determination shall be valid at the time of building permit issuance for the Prior to the Applicant; high-rise structure. The City shall expressly prohibit issuance of any building permit for a structure issuance of building Planning in the absence of a current and valid FAA No Hazard Determination. permits Division SC 3.10-4 The Applicant shall comply with the final FAA No Hazard Determination issued on July 23, 2007, Prior to final master Applicant; which established a maximum building height of 254 feet above msl for the proposed high-rise plan approval Planning residential tower at 3350 Avenue of the Arts. Amendments to the 2015-2035 General Plan and Division North Costa Mesa Specific Plan are not necessary to accommodate additional building height of up to 220 feet above ground level as specified in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan. In addition, this EIR has examined the maximum building heights as defined in the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and concluded that no significant impacts will occur. SC 3.10-5 The Applicant shall work with JWA and City staff on a "Grant of Navigation Easement' for a Prior to the Applicant; specified area of the subject property that penetrates the imaginary horizontal surface of JWA issuance of building Planning above elevation 206 feet above msl (NAVD 88). The Applicant shall grant this Navigation permits for any Division; Easement to the County of Orange/JWA to permit the unencumbered and unrestricted flight of structures that JWA/County aircraft to or from JWA. Recordation of the Navigation Easement shall occur prior to issuance of penetrates the of Orange any building permit that penetrates the imaginary horizontal surface of JWA. imaginary horizontal surface of JWA. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-6 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed Cultural Resources Standard Conditions of Approval SC Cultural 1 Site excavation and grading shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist and Native American During grading and Applicant; monitor. If archaeological materials are identified during grading and construction, all excavation Planning construction activities shall be temporarily halted or redirected to permit the sampling, activities. Division; identification, and evaluation of archaeological materials as determined by the City, who shall Monitoring at qualified establish, in cooperation with the project proponent, certified archaeologist, and Native American depths 5 feet or archaeologist; representative, the appropriate procedures for exploration and/or salvage of the artifacts. greater. Native Monitoring is only required where grading and excavation activities would disturb soils at a depth American of 5 feet or more. monitor If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Geology and Soils Standard Conditions of Approval SC 3.3-1 Where studies indicate that buildings may be subject to substantial damage during earthquakes, During building plan Applicant; the structure shall be designed and/or retrofitted for seismic resistance in compliance with all preparation Development relevant recommendations for seismic design and seismic safety in the most recent editions of Services the Uniform Building Code and the California Building Code. Department Mitigation Measures MM 3.3-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a site-specific final Prior to issuance of Applicant; geotechnical investigation, including an evaluation, analysis, and mitigation recommendations for grading permits Development the issues identified in the Zeiser Kling Consultants' Geotechnical Evaluation (March 2007), Services including appropriate dust control measures and waterproof building designs with hydrostatic Department pressure resistive properties and a site specific probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for ground motion. All recommendations shall be incorporated into the final grading plan for the project. The project shall incorporate all recommendations of the detailed Geotechnical Report into the plans and specifications as required by the City Engineer. MM 3.3-2 During grading operations, special handling of on-site soils shall be required due to high moisture During grading Applicant; content of the soils. The City shall monitor the Grading Contractor to ensure stabilization of the activities Development soils during grading and excavation activities, as recommended by the Zeiser Kling Consultants' Services Geotechnical Evaluation (March 2007). Department R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-6 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed MM 3.3-3 Prior to the issuance of the first demolition and/or grading permit, the Applicant shall ensure that Prior to issuance of Applicant; pile foundations or other appropriate design be incorporated into the project design to mitigate first demolition Development potential settlement hazards and liquefaction beneath the proposed structures. and/or grading Services permit Department MM 3.3-4 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit a project design to ensure that Prior to the Applicant; any proposed subterranean portion of the structures are waterproofed and designed and installed issuance of building Development to resist hydrostatic pressures associated with the shallow groundwater table in the area. permits Services Department Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measures MM 3.9-1 All asbestos-related work, including demolition and renovation, shall be performed by a licensed During any Applicant; Asbestos -abatement Contractor under the supervision of a certified Asbestos Consultant. construction phases Development Asbestos shall be removed and disposed of in compliance with notification and asbestos -removal involving Services procedures outlined in SCAQMD Rule 1403 to reduce asbestos-related health risks. asbestos -containing Department materials Hydrology and Water Quality Project Design Features PDF 3.4-1 The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the proposed project includes the Prior to approval of Applicant; following project -specific water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) which shall be first mass grading Public implemented as part of the project: plan. Services Department Site Design BMPs • Permeable surface area has been kept the same as the existing condition. • Drive aisle has been minimized to least acceptable dimension for Fire Access and access to the proposed truck dock. • All areas available for landscaping have been utilized. Planter boxes will also be included on the design of the top story of the parking structure to help minimize impervious surfaces. • All parking is within a structure and covered. Non-structural Source Control BMPs • Activity restriction, common area landscape management, BMP maintenance, Title 22 CCR Compliance, local water quality permit compliance, uniform fire code implementation, common area litter control, employee training, housekeeping of loading docks, catch basin inspection, street sweeping of private streets and parking lots. Routine Structural BMPs • Storm drain stenciling and signage, proper trash storage and loading dock design, efficient irrigation, and landscape design. Treatment Control BMPs • CONTECH StormFilter will be used in the three on-site manhole installations. RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-8 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed • Media filters will be used in the CONTECH Storm Filters. PDF 3.4-2 Prior to approval of the first mass grading plan, the Applicant shall submit a Proposed Storm Drain Prior to approval of Applicant; Improvement Plan to the Public Services Department for review and approval. The plan shall first mass grading Public demonstrate substantial conformance with the Orange County Hydrology Manual for design of plan. Services lateral storm drains and catch basins. Proposed storm drain improvements include: Department • Line "A" — One new catch basin is proposed and the relocation of an existing catch basin to accommodate widening and re -alignment of the on-site drive aisle. • Line "B" — No new facilities are proposed. The Line B system will drain to an existing lateral located on the northern side of the property or directly to an Avenue of the Arts lateral. The tie-in location will be decided as building plans progress. • Line "C" — One new Avenue of the Arts storm drain connection is proposed to drain the southern portion of the site. The new line will include two on-site inlets. Mitigation Measures MM 3.4-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall verify that structural BMPs have been Prior to issuance of Applicant; permanently incorporated into the project plans. Such BMPs shall ensure that pollutants from grading permits Public project -related storm water runoff are mitigated consistent with applicable State and local Services standards. Department MM 3.4-2 The Applicant shall assume all BMP inspection and maintenance responsibilities for the project. For the life of the Applicant; The Property -owners Association (POA) fees will provide the funding mechanism for long-term project Development BMP maintenance. Services Department MM 3.4-3 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the Applicant shall submit to the Development Prior to issuance of Applicant; Services Department for review and approval a WQMP that: grading permits Development Services • Addresses site design BMPs such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, Department minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating reduced or "zero discharge" areas, and conserving natural areas; • Incorporates the applicable Routine Source Control BMPs as defined in the Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP); • Incorporates Treatment Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP; • Generally describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control BMPs • Identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs; and • Describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-8 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed MM 3.4-4 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall demonstrate that coverage has been Prior to issuance of Applicant; obtained under California's General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with grading permits Public Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Services Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of Department a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number. The Applicant shall prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review on request. MM 3.4-5 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide proof of a National Pollutant Prior to issuance of Applicant; Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the RWQCB—consistent with Order No. R8- building permits Public 2010-0062 and NPDES No. CAS618030 or current permits—to the City of Costa Mesa for Services dewatering activities. Department MM 3.4-6 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall prepare drainage plans for the Public Prior to issuance of Applicant; Services Department's review and approval. The Drainage Plan shall define the exact size and grading permits Public location of drainage facilities, and shall address standing water on the project site during project Services grading. Department MM 3.4-7 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall pay drainage impact fees. The Project Prior to issuance of Applicant; Developer shall be responsible for the drainage impact fees that are in place at the time grading grading permits Public permits are issued. Services Department Land Use and Planning Standard Conditions of Approval Prior to Master Plan Planning approval Division SC 3.1-1 Prior to site plan approval, the Applicant shall submit to the Planning Division, for review and Prior to site plan Applicant; approval, project plans that comply with the Development Standards as set forth in the North approval Planning Costa Mesa Specific Plan and Zoning Code. In addition, all site development shall be subject to Division all standard conditions of approval imposed by the City. R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-10 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed Noise Standard Conditions of Approval SC 3.7-1 Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours and activities with (exception of During all Applicant; federal holidays): construction phases Development Services HOURS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Department Monday 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 Construction activities limited to through am. mobilization only Friday 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All construction activities permitted Saturdays Construction activities limited to 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. mobilization only 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. All construction activities permitted 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Construction activities limited to demobilization only Construction activities are prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays. All noise generating activities should be limited these hours. SC 3.7-2 The Applicant shall prepare a truck route plan for review and approval by the City of Costa Mesa Prior to approval of Applicant; Transportation Services Division prior to the approval of the construction access permit. The truck the construction Transportation route plan shall preclude truck routes through residential areas, including Avenue of the Arts north access permit Services of the project site and Sunflower Avenue. The total truck trips to the site shall not exceed 200 Division trucks per day (i.e., 100 truck trips to the site plus 100 truck trips from the site). Mitigation Measures MM 3.7-1 The Applicant shall submit detailed plans for the parking structure prior to the issuance of a Prior to issuance of Applicant; grading or building permit for the structure. Said plans shall be accompanied by an acoustical a grading or Development study prepared by a qualified Acoustical Consultant. The acoustical study shall demonstrate that building permit for Services all feasible sound attenuation in compliance with the Noise Ordinance has been incorporated into the parking Department parking structure design, including but not limited to brushed driving surfaces (textured), limited structure openings oriented toward sensitive noise sources, etc. MM 3.7-2 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a detailed acoustical study using architectural plans Prior to issuance of Applicant; shall be prepared by a qualified Acoustical Consultant and shall be submitted to the Planning first building permit Development Division addressing delivery truck/loading dock and trash disposal operations adjacent to Services residences. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the architectural Department plans for the delivery/truck loading dock/trash collection area to ensure compliance with the Noise Ordinance. RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-10 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-11 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed MM 3.7-3 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a detailed acoustical study using architectural plans Prior to issuance of Applicant; shall be prepared by a qualified Acoustical Consultant and shall be submitted to the Planning first building permit Development Division addressing mechanical equipment. This study shall address any mechanical equipment Services to be sited within 71 feet of off-site residences. The measures described in the report shall be Department incorporated into the architectural plans for mechanical equipment to ensure compliance with the Noise Ordinance. MM 3.7-4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a detailed acoustical study using architectural plans Prior to issuance of Applicant; shall be prepared by a qualified Acoustical Consultant and shall be submitted to the City of Costa first building permit Development Mesa for all living units on the west side of the hotel tower facing Avenue of the Arts. This report Services shall describe and quantify the noise sources impacting the building(s), the amount of outdoor -to- Department indoor noise reduction provided by the design in the architectural plans, and any upgrades required to meet the City's interior noise standards (45 CNEL for residences). Noise standards shall be met with all doors and windows closed. Alternatively, the Applicant can show that based on the building location relative to the roadway and any intervening topography and structures that it meets the appropriate interior noise standard with open windows. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the architectural plans for the buildings and implemented with building construction. The person preparing the report shall, under the direction of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, perform an inspection of the project prior to or at the time of the framing inspection to certify that construction techniques comply with the recommendations within the acoustical analysis. Upon completion of the subject structures, field tests may be required by the Planning Division. Population, Housing, and Employment No mitigation required. Public Services Standard Conditions of Approval SC 3.11-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit project designs and Prior to issuance of Applicant; Fire specifications for review and approval by the Fire Department with respect to compliance with all building permits Department standard conditions for building design regarding public safety, including but not limited to, fire flow capacity, fire hydrant location, vehicular access, and sprinkler systems. SC 3.11-2 Emergency vehicle parking areas shall be designated within proximity to buildings to the Prior to issuance of Applicant; Fire satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. building permits Department SC 3.11-3 Each project component shall provide sufficient capacity for fire flows required by the Fire Prior to issuance of Applicant; Fire Department. building permits Department SC 3.11-4 Vehicular access shall be provided and maintained as serviceable, throughout construction, to all Prior to issuance of Applicant; Fire required fire hydrants. building permits Department SC 3.11-5 All high-rise project developments shall be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system. Prior to issuance of Applicant; Fire building permits Department R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-11 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-12 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed SC 3.11-6 The Applicant shall comply with standard building and fire regulations for high-rise buildings to Prior to issuance of Applicant; Fire the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal and Building Official. building permits Marshal and Building Official SC 3.11-7 The Applicant shall comply with the Public Safety Radio System Coverage Ordinance (included Prior to issuance of Applicant; in the standard building and fire regulations for high-rise buildings) to the satisfaction of the Police building permits Police Chief Chief. SC 3.11-8 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit project designs and Prior to issuance of Applicant; specifications for review and receive approval by the Police Department with respect to building permits Police compliance with all standard conditions for building design regarding public safety, including but Department not limited to, lighting, address numbers, building standards, live media cameras with direct feed, landscaping, and emergency vehicle parking. SC 3.11-9 Required building address numbers shall be readily apparent from the street, and rooftop building Prior to issuance of Applicant; identification shall be readily apparent from police helicopters for emergency response agencies. Certificate of Police Occupancy Department SC 3.11-10 The Applicant shall pay school impact fees. Prior to the Applicant; issuance of the first Planning building permit Division SC 3.11-12 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall pay a library services impact fee for the Prior to issuance of Applicant; development costs for expanded or new library facilities pursuant to the Library Services Impact building permits Planning Fee Program, if such a program is established. Division Mitigation Measures MM 3.11-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall pay its pro rata share of a new, fully Prior to issuance of Applicant; Fire equipped paramedic engine, equal to $469.35 per unit to the Fire Department. building permits Department MM 3.11-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a construction security service shall be established at the Prior to issuance of Applicant; construction site. Initially, the service shall ensure that no unauthorized entry is made into the grading permits Police construction area. For the duration of each phase of construction, the Applicant shall provide Department sufficient on-site security personnel on a 24-hour, 7 -day -a -week basis to patrol all areas of construction and to prohibit unauthorized entry. MM 3.11-3 During project construction and operation, the Applicant shall ensure that private on-site security During project Applicant; is provided. construction and Police operation Department MM 3.11-4 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall pay pro rata shares of fees to the Police Prior to issuance of Applicant; Department for the increased service capacity necessary to accommodate the development site, building permits Police if such a police impact fee program is established. Department MM 3.11-5 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall comply with direct media feeding devices Prior to issuance of Applicant; required by the Police Department for increased safety necessary to serve the development site, building permits Police if such a police program is established. Department R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-12 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed Transportation and Circulation Standard Conditions of Approval SC 3.5-1 The Applicant shall be responsible for the payment of fees in accordance with the Traffic Impact Prior to issuance of Applicant; Fee program. building permits Planning Division SC 3.5-2 The Applicant shall be responsible for the payment of fees in accordance with the San Joaquin Prior to issuance of Applicant; Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Ordinance. Fees shall be paid to the Planning Division prior to building permits Planning the issuance of building permits. Division SC 3.5-3 The Applicant shall be responsible for complying with the Transportation Demand Ordinance. Prior to issuance of Applicant; building permits Transportation Services Division Utilities Project Design Features PDF 3.12-1 The project assumes the implementation of the following energy conservation actions: Prior to Certificate Applicant; of Occupancy Development • The use of drought tolerant planting Services • Reduced water consumption Department • Compliance with ASHRAE 55-1992/2004 • Storage and collection of recyclables • Construction waste management to salvage and recycle • Use of recycled building materials • Use of low -emitting materials • Use of locally manufactured materials • Use of carbon dioxide monitoring • Minimum 50 percent drought tolerant planting to reduce water consumption • Low flow drip irrigation system to mitigate water runoff and water loss • Smart irrigation controllers to alter irrigation timing and flow due to weather and wind patterns • Use turf block in turf areas to help with drainage • Using bioswale planters on the pool deck to filter/store rain water • Use of shared parking to reduce parking footprint • Sustainable site erosion and sediment control for construction activities • Light pollution reduction - minimal use of uplighting • Indoor Air Quality strategies • Sustainable life -cycle impacts • Enhanced Daylighting / Views for inhabitants • Enhanced Acoustics design for inhabitants RAProjects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Starwood Tribute Hotel Project Addendum to FOR 1054 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-14 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Responsible Date Project Design Features/Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Measures Timing Parties Completed Standard Conditions of Approval SC 3.12-1 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate to the Public Prior to issuance of Applicant; Services Department that all construction waste generated on site would be recycled where demolition/grading Public feasible as the first choice of disposal method, leaving the option of landfill disposal as a last permits Services alternative. Department SC 3.12-2 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall submit grading plans to Prior to issuance of Applicant; the Development Services Department that reflect the undergrounding of utilities serving the demolition/grading Development proposed project site. permits Services Department SC 3.12-3 Prior to the issuance of demolition/grading permits, the Applicant shall coordinate with Southern Prior to issuance of Applicant; California Edison (SCE) to determine the exact location of all underground and overhead electrical demolition/grading SCE; facilities. All electrical facilities and associated structures that will remain on the project site shall permits Development be protected from damage by the Applicant. Services Department SC 3.12-4 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall coordinate with the Prior to issuance of Applicant; Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) to determine exact locations of all underground demolition/grading SCGC; natural gas facilities. The Applicant shall ensure that all remaining gas pipelines and associated permits Development structures on the project site shall be protected from damage. Services Department SC 3-12-5 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall coordinate with Time Prior to issuance of Applicant; Warner Cable to determine exact locations of all underground cable facilities. The Applicant shall demolition/grading Time Warner ensure that all remaining cable lines and associated structures on the project site shall be permits Cable; protected from damage. Development Services Department SC 3.12-6 Prior to the issuance of a demolition/grading permit, the Applicant shall coordinate with AT&T Prior to issuance of Applicant; California to determine exact locations of all underground telephone facilities. The Applicant shall demolition/grading AT&T; ensure that all remaining telephone lines and associated structures on the project site shall be permits Development protected from damage. Services Department Mitigation Measures MM 3.12-1 Prior to the initiation of project grading, the Applicant shall ensure that all existing utilities shall be Prior to initiation of Applicant; relocated, abandoned, and removed, rerouted, or protected in coordination with the Applicant and grading Development affected utility companies. Services Department R:\Projects\COS_ CMX\3COS010100\Addendum\Starwood Addendum-081016.docx A-14 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program APPENDIX B AIR QUALITY CALCULATIONS CALIFORNIA AND NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS California Federal Standards Primarya Secondaryb Pollutant Averaging Time Standards 1 Hour 0.09 ppm (180 pg/m3) - - 03 8 Hour 0.070 ppm (137 3 0.070 ppm (137 pg/m) Same as Primary pg/m3) PM10 24 Hour 50 pg/m3 150 pg/m3 Same as Primary AAM 20 pg/m3 - - 24 Hour - 35 pg/m3 Same as Primary PM2.5 AAM 12 pg/m3 12.0 pg/m3 15.0 pg/m3 1 Hour 20 ppm (23 mg/m3) 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) - CO 8 Hour 9.0 ppm (10 mg/m3) 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) - AAM 0.030 ppm (57 pg/m3) 0.053 ppm (100 pg/m3) Same as Primary NO2 1 Hour 0.18 ppm (339 pg/m3) 0.100 ppm (188 pg/m3) - 24 Hour 0.04 ppm (105 pg/m3) - - S02 3 Hour - - 0.5 ppm (1,300 pg/m3) 1 Hour 0.25 ppm (655 pg/m3) 0.075 ppm (196 pg/m3) - 30 -day Avg. 1.5 pg/m3 - - Lead Calendar Quarter - 1.5 pg/m3 Same as Primary Rolling 3 -month Avg. - 0.15 pg/m3 Visibility Extinction coefficient Reducing 8 Hour of 0.23 per km - Particles visibility >- 10 miles No Federal Standards Sulfates 24 Hour 25 pg/m3 Hydrogen 1 Hour 0.03 ppm (42 pg/m3) Sulfide Vinyl Chloride 24 Hour 0.01 ppm (26 pg/m3) 03: ozone, ppm: parts per million, pg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter, —: No Standard; PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less, AAM: Annual Arithmetic Mean, PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less, CO: carbon monoxide, mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter, NO2: nitrogen dioxide, SO2: sulfur dioxide, km: kilometer. a National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, within an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health. b National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant. Note: More detailed information in the data presented in this table can be found at the CARB website (www.arb.ca.gov). Source: CARB 2015b. CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/20/2016 4:00 PM Starwood Addendum 3350 Avenue of the Arts; Costa Mesa, CA Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 335.00 Space 1.50 134,000.00 0 Hotel 150.00 Room 1.50 283,886.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2019 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 512.9 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - SCE Manual Calcs for 2019. Land Use - Hotel- 150 rooms- sq ft 283,886 parking: 335 spaces, sf default Construction Phase - Demo: 10/1/17-11/24/17 Grading/Excavation: 11/25/17-12/22/17 Off-road Equipment --defaults Off-road Equipment - Defaults Off-road Equipment - Default Off-road Equipment - defaults Off-road Equipment - Defaults Trips and VMT - Defaults except grading and demo. 1,936 total hauling trips for grading. 490 trips for demo 1 of 27 Demolition - estimate, based on parking garage aerials Grading - 29,040 Based on data from 7/15. 15 CY trucks, total of 1,936 truckloads Architectural Coating - Brought VOC to 100 int and 250 ext g/L for nonres. Int/ext sqft: manual calcs. 425,829 (int) and 50% of total ext: 40,972 (ext) Vehicle Trips - Traffic memo 3/25/16 and manual calcs Area Coating - Interior/ext: 425,829/79792 sqft, Brought VOC to 100 int/250 ext g/L for nonres. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Tier 3 equipment for all Energy Mitigation - Title 24 compliance Water Mitigation - Standard Waste Mitigation - standard Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 208,943.00 40,972.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_ menor 626,829.00 425,829.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_ Nonresidential interior 250.00 100.00 tblAreaCoating Area—EF—Nonresidential—Interior 250 100 tblAreaCoating Area_ Non residential—Exterior 208943 141943 tblAreaCoating Area_ Nonresidential—Interior 626829 425829 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 2of27 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstruction Phase NumDays 10.00 63.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays 220.00 352.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 40.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays 6.00 20.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays 10.00 12.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/26/2019 4/30/2019 tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 5/16/2019 4/30/2019 tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate 5/1/2019 2/1/2019 tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate 5/1/2019 4/14/2019 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 3.00 tblGrading Material Exported 0.00 29,040.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 217,800.00 283,886.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.01 1.50 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.00 1.50 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 3 of 27 tblProjectCharacteristics CO21ntensityFactor 630.89 512.9 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2019 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 3,630.00 1,936.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 35.00 15.00 tblVehicleTrips ST -TR 8.19 6.67 tblVehicleTrips SU -TR 5.95 4.85 tblVehicleTrips WD -TR 8.17 6.66 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 70 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Year lb/day Ib/day 2017 5.2820 61.3498 47.4358 0.1027 8.1996 2.4079 10.6075 3.8586 2.2152 6.0738 10,239.536 1.1212 0.0000 10,263.08 2 06 2018 3.7666 29.0025 32.6720 0.0640 2.3923 1.5867 3.9790 0.6428 1.4899 2.1327 5,773.7039 0.7304 0.0000 5,789.043 2 2019 43.6206 38.4995 44.4042 0.0869 2.7612 2.0587 4.8198 0.7406 1.9321 2.6727 7,778.2179 1.2156 0.0000 7,803.745 3 Total 52.6692 128.8519 124.5120 0.2535 13.3531 6.0533 19.4063 5.2419 5.6372 10.8792 23,791.458 3.0672 0.0000 23,855.86 0 91 4 of 27 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Bio -0O2 CH4 N20 CO2e N20 I I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 Total I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 2.5515 40.1822 42.4307 0.1027 4.7096 1.1546 5.8642 2.0148 1.1250 3.1398 30.46 10,239.536 1.1212 0.0000 10,263.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 004 004 004 2 004 06 2018 1.7692 19.9158 32.9549 0.0640 2.3923 0.9940 3.3863 0.6428 0.9867 1.6295 5,773.7039 0.7304 0.0000 5,789.043 _][_ ��3,273.0386�7 2 2019 41.0702 28.2029 46.2319 0.0869 2.7612 1.4832 4.2444 0.7406 1.4761 2.2167 7,778.2179 1.2156 0.0000 7,803.745 3 Total i 45.3908 88.3009 121.6175 0.2535 9.8631 3.6318 13.4949 3.3982 3.5878 6.9860 1 23,791.458 3.0672 0.0000 23,855.86 0 91 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG ROG NOx c0 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 I PM10 Total PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 9.2703 4.6000e- 0.0500 Percent 13.82 31.47 2.32 0.00 26.14 40.00 30.46 35.17 36.36 35.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 004 004 004 004 Energy 0.3000 2.7275 2.2911 0.0164 0.2073 0.2073 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I 1 1 Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 9.2703 4.6000e- 0.0500 0.0000 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.1061 2.9000e- 0.1122 004 004 004 004 004 004 Energy 0.3000 2.7275 2.2911 0.0164 0.2073 0.2073 0.2073 0.2073 0.0600 3,292.957 ��3,273.0386�7 8 Mobile 2.6303 5.1718 24.3349 0.0682 5.0448 0.0749 5.1198 1.3461 0.0692 1.4153 5,395.2500 0.2059 5,399.573 0 Total 12.2005 7.8998 26.6760 0.0846 5.0448 0.2824 5.3272 1.3461 0.2766 1.6227 8,668.3947 0.2689 0.0600 8,692.643 0 5of27 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Bio- CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Area 9.2703 4.6000e- 0.0500 0.0000 0.97 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 7.62 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.53 0.1061 2.9000e- 5.03 0.1122 0.00 004 9.19 39.38 14.92 004 004 004 004 004 Energy 0.1819 1.6535 1.3890 9.9200e- 0.1257 0.1257 0.1257 0.1257 1,984.2099 0.0380 0.0364 1,996.285 003 __]L_ 4 Mobile 2.6303 5.1718 24.3349 0.0682 5.0448 0.0749 5.1198 1.3461 0.0692 1.4153 5,395.2500 0.2059 5,399.573 0 Total i 12.0824 6.8258 25.7738 0.0782 5.0448 0.2008 5.2456 1.3461 0.1950 1.5411 1 7,379.5660 0.2442 0.0364 7,395.970 7 6of27 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.97 13.60 3.38 7.62 0.00 28.90 1.53 0.00 29.51 5.03 0.00 0.00 14.87 9.19 39.38 14.92 Reduction 6of27 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2017 11/24/2017 5 40 2 Grading/Excavation Grading 11/25/2017 12/22/2017 5 20 3 (Building Construction Building Construction 12/23/2017 4/30/2019 5 352 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/1/2019 4/30/2019 5 63 5 (Paving ii Paving 14/14/2019 4/30/2019 5 12 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 425,829; Non -Residential Outdoor: 40,972 (Architectural Coating — OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 162 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Grading/Excavation Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38 Grading/Excavation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Grading/Excavation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Grading/Excavation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 17.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 7of27 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 130 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class 1 Vendor Hauling Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 490.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT Grading/Excavation 6 15.00 0.00 1,936.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 176.00 68.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 15 -00E= 5.00 -00I 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD -Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area 8of27 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust PM10 PM10 I 2.6534 0.0000 2.6534 0.4017 0.0000 0.4017 0.0000 Category Ib/day 0.0000 Off -Road 4.0482 42.6971 33.8934 0.0399 8.9800e- 2.1252 2.1252 0.2600 1.9797 1.9797 0.1013 4,036.4674 1.1073 6.4200e- 4,059.721 1 Total 4.0482 42.6971 33.8934 0.0399 2.6534 2.1252 4.7786 0.4017 1.9797 2.3815 J 4,036.4674 1.1073 003 4,059.721 1 Unmitiaated Construction Off -Site ROG N7 CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.2248 3.2017 2.7017 8.9800e- 0.2134 0.0466 0.2600 0.0584 0.0428 0.1013 891.0260 6.4200e- 891.1608 003 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 [--0.0000J�000�10.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ]- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0498 0.0671 0.7054 1.9300e- 0.1677 1.1500e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0600e- 0.0455 154.9456 7.4300e- 155.1015 003 003 003 003 Total i 0.2746 3.2689 3.4072 0.0109 0.3811 0.0477 0.4288 0.1029 0.0439 0.1468 1 1,045.9716 0.0139 1,046.262 3 9 of 27 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust I PM10 I PM10 1.1940 0.0000 1.1940 0.1808 0.0000 0.1808 I 0.0000 Category Ib/day 0.0000 Off -Road 0.9478 18.7614 25.2649 0.0399 0.2134 0.8817 0.8817 0.0584 0.8817 0.8817 4,036.4674 1.1073 4,059.721 1 Total 0.9478 18.7614 25.2649 0.0399 1.1940 0.8817 2.0757 0.1808 0.8817 1.0625 J 4,036.4674 1.1073 4,059.721 1 Mitiaated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.2248 3.2017 2.7017 8.9800e- 0.2134 0.0466 0.2600 0.0584 0.0428 0.1013 891.0260 6.4200e- 891.1608 003 003 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 [--0.0000J�000�10.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0498 0.0671 0.7054 1.9300e- 0.1677 1.1500e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0600e- 0.0455 154.9456 7.4300e- 155.1015 003 003 003 003 Total 0.2746 3.2689 3.4072 0.0109 0.3811 0.0477 0.4288 0.1029 0.0439 0.1468 i 1,045.9716 0.0139 1,046.262 1 3 10 of 27 3.3 Grading/Excavation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG I NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust L -J I PM10 I PM10 6.3454 0.0000 6.3454 3.3523 0.0000 3.3523 I 0.0000 Category Ib/day 0.0000 Off -Road 3.4555 35.9825 25.3812 0.0297 1.6865 2.0388 2.0388 0.4618 1.8757 1.8757 3,043.6667 0.9326 3,063.250 7 Total 3.4555 35.9825 25.3812 0.0297 6.3454 2.0388 8.3842 3.3523 1.8757 5.2280 J 3,043.6667 0.9326 3,063.250 7 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 1.7767 25.3003 21.3491 0.0710 1.6865 0.3680 2.0545 0.4618 0.3385 0.8003 7,040.9240 0.0507 7,041.989 1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 F 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0498 0.0671 0.7054 1.9300e- 0.1677 1.1500e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0600e- 0.0455 154.9456 7.4300e- 155.1015 003 003 003 003 Total 1.8265 25.3674 22.0546 0.0729 1.8542 0.3691 2.2233 0.5063 0.3395 0.8458 7,195.8695 0.0582 7,197.090 6 11 of 27 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG I NOx CO SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust I PM10 2.8554 0.0000 2.8554 1.5085 0.0000 1.5085 Total 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 0.7250 14.8148 20.3762 0.0297 0.7854 0.7854 0.7854 0.7854 Hauling 1.7767 3,043.6667 0.9326 3,063.250 7 Total 0.7250 14.8148 20.3762 0.0297 2.8554 0.7854 3.6409 1.5085 0.7854 2.2940 0.8003 3,043.6667 0.9326 3,063.250 7 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 12 of 27 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ERO Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 1.7767 25.3003 21.3491 0.0710 1.6865 0.3680 2.0545 0.4618 0.3385 0.8003 7,040.9240 0.0507 7,041.989 1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0498 0.0671 0.7054 1.9300e- 0.1677 1.1500e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0600e- 0.0455 154.9456 7.4300e- 155.1015 003 003 003 003 Total 1.8265 25.3674 22.0546 0.0729 1.8542 0.3691 2.2233 0.5063 0.3395 0.8458 7,195.8695 0.0582 7,197.090 6 12 of 27 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 3.1024 26.4057 18.1291 0.0268 0.0000 1.7812 1.7812 0.0000 1.6730 1.6730 2,639.8053 0.6497 2,653.449 Vendor 0.6062 5.4745 7.9249 0.0146 0.4251 0.0841 0.5091 0.1211 0.0773 0.1984 1,438.3763 0.0105 0 Total i 3.1024 26.4057 18.1291 0.0268 1.7812 1.7812 1.6730 1.6730 2,639.8053 0.6497 2,653.449 Worker 0.5844 0.7878 8.2771 0.0226 1.9673 0.0134 1.9807 0.5217 0.0124 0.5341 1,818.0278 0.0871 0 - Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �� 0.0000 Vendor 0.6062 5.4745 7.9249 0.0146 0.4251 0.0841 0.5091 0.1211 0.0773 0.1984 1,438.3763 0.0105 1,438.595 9 Worker 0.5844 0.7878 8.2771 0.0226 1.9673 0.0134 1.9807 0.5217 0.0124 0.5341 1,818.0278 0.0871 1,819.857 9 Total 1.1906 6.2622 16.2020 0.0372 2.3923 0.0975 2.4898 0.6428 0.0897 0.7325 3,256.4041 0.0976 3,258.453 8 13 of 27 Mitiaated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 I I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.6712 14.1741 17.8156 0.0268 0.0000 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 0.9016 0.9016 2,639.8053 0.6497 0.0000 2,653.449 0.0000 Vendor 0.6062 5.4745 7.9249 0.0146 0.4251 0.0841 0.5091 0.1211 0.0773 0.1984 1,438.3763 0 Total 0.6712 14.1741 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 2,639.8053 0.6497 2,653.449 9 Worker 0.5844 0.7878 8.2771 0.0226 1.9673 0.0134 1.9807 0.5217 0.0124 0.5341 0 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 7TO CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 j 0.0000 Vendor 0.6062 5.4745 7.9249 0.0146 0.4251 0.0841 0.5091 0.1211 0.0773 0.1984 1,438.3763 0.0105 1,438.595 9 Worker 0.5844 0.7878 8.2771 0.0226 1.9673 0.0134 1.9807 0.5217 0.0124 0.5341 1,818.0278 0.0871 1,819.857 9 Total 1.1906 6.2622 16.2020 0.0372 2.3923 0.0975 2.4898 0.6428 0.0897 0.7325 3,256.4041 0.0976 3,258.453 8 14 of 27 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 2.6687 23.2608 17.5327 0.0268 0.0000 1.4943 1.4943 1.4048 1.4048 0.0000 0.000070.0000 2,609.9390 0.6387 2,623.351 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.5653 5.0229 7.5828 0.0146 0.4250 0.0792 0.5042 7 Total 2.6687 23.2608 17.5327 0.0268 1,413.9280 P011.4943 1.4943 1.4048 1.4048 2,609.9390 0.6387 2,623.351 7 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000070.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.5653 5.0229 7.5828 0.0146 0.4250 0.0792 0.5042 0.1211 0.0728 0.1939 1,413.9280 0.0104 1,414.146 7 Worker 0.5326 0.7188 7.5565 0.0226 1.9673 0.0133 1.9806 0.5217 0.0123 0.5340 1,749.8370 0.0813 1,751.544 9 Total 1.0979 5.7417 15.1393 0.0372 2.3923 0.0925 2.4848 0.6428 0.0851 0.7279 3,163.7650 0.0917 3,165.691 5 15 of 27 Mitiaated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 I I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.6712 14.1741 17.8156 0.0268 L0.000010.0000 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 0.9016 0.9016 2,609.9389 0.6387 0.0000 2,623.351 0.0000 Vendor 7.5828 0.0146 0.4250 0.0792 0.1211 0.1939 1,413.9280 7 Total 0.6712 14.1741 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 �n 2,609.9389 0.6387 2,623.351 7 _n_n Worker 0.5326 0.7188 7.5565 0.0226 1.9673 0.0133 1.9806 0.5217 0.0123 0.5340 7 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 7TO CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 L0.000010.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 j 0.0000 Vendor 7.5828 0.0146 0.4250 0.0792 0.1211 0.1939 1,413.9280 0.0104 1,414.146 �Ln �n 7 _n_n Worker 0.5326 0.7188 7.5565 0.0226 1.9673 0.0133 1.9806 0.5217 0.0123 0.5340 1,749.8370 0.0813 1,751.544 9 Total 1.0979 5.7417 15.1393 0.0372 2.3923 0.0925 2.4848 0.6428 0.0851 0.7279 J 3,163.7650 0.0917 3,165.691 5 16 of 27 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 2.3516 20.9650 17.1204 0.0268 0.0000 1.2850 1.2850 0.0000 1.2083 1.2083 2,580.7618 0.6279 2,593.947 0.0000 Vendor 0.5274 4.6566 7.2461 0.0146 0.4251 0.0738 0.4989 0.1211 0.0679 0.1890 1,394.2845 9 Total 2.3516 20.9650 17.1204 0.0268 1.2850 1.2850 1.2083 1.2083 2,580.7618 0.6279 2,593.947 8 Worker 0.4978 0.6661 7.0359 0.0227 1.9673 0.0134 1.9807 0.5217 0.0124 0.5342 9 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �� 0.0000 Vendor 0.5274 4.6566 7.2461 0.0146 0.4251 0.0738 0.4989 0.1211 0.0679 0.1890 1,394.2845 0.0105 1,394.504 8 Worker 0.4978 0.6661 7.0359 0.0227 1.9673 0.0134 1.9807 0.5217 0.0124 0.5342 1,695.1717 0.0776 1,696.802 0 Total 1.0252 5.3227 14.2819 0.0373 2.3923 0.0872 2.4796 0.6428 0.0803 0.7231 3,089.4562 0.0881 3,091.306 8 17 of 27 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.6712 14.1741 17.8156 0.0268 0.0000 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.0000 0.0000 2,580.7618 0.6279 2,593.947 0.0000 �� 0.0000 Vendor 0.5274 4.6566 7.2461 0.0146 0.4251 0.0738 0.4989 0.1211 0.0679 9 Total 0.6712 14.1741 17.8156 0.0268 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 0.9016 2,580.7618 0.6279 2,593.947 8 Worker 0.4978 0.6661 7.0359 9 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �� 0.0000 Vendor 0.5274 4.6566 7.2461 0.0146 0.4251 0.0738 0.4989 0.1211 0.0679 0.1890 1,394.2845 0.0105 1,394.504 8 Worker 0.4978 0.6661 7.0359 0.0227 1.9673 0.0134 1.9807 0.5217 0.0124 0.5342 1,695.1717 0.0776 1,696.802 0 Total 1.0252 5.3227 14.2819 0.0373 2.3923 0.0872 2.4796 0.6428 0.0803 0.7231 3,089.4562 0.0881 3,091.306 8 18 of 27 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 38.8648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 0.0000 281.4481 0.0238 0.0000 281.9473 Total 39.1312 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.0568 0.1288 0.1288 0.1677 0.1288 0.1288 0.0445 1.0600e- 003 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 I Total CO2 I CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 F 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0424 0.0568 0.5997 1.9300e- 003 0.1677 1.1400e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0600e- 003 0.0455 144.4749 6.6200e- 003 144.6138 Total 0.0424 0.0568 0.5997 1.9300e- 003 0.1677 1.1400e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0600e- 003 0.0455 144.4749 6.6200e- 003 144.6138 19 of 27 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG I NOx CO SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating 38.8648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 0.0951 003 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Total 38.9242 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 0.0951 003 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 �[n 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 7TO CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �[n 0.0000 In 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0424 0.0568 0.5997 1.9300e- 003 0.1677 1.1400e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0600e- 003 0.0455 144.4749 6.6200e- 003 144.6138 Total 0.0424 0.0568 0.5997 1.9300e- 003 0.1677 1.1400e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0600e- 003 0.0455 144.4749 6.6200e- 003 144.6138 20 of 27 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG I NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.0192 10.2516 9.8414 0.0155 0.0000 0.5551 0.5551 0.5124 0.5124 0.0000 1,508.7071 0.4612 0.0000 1,518.393 0 Paving 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0192 10.2516 9.8414 0.0155 0.7196 0.5551 0.5551 0.5124 0.5124 J 0.0534 1.2700e- 003 1,508.7071 0.4612 1,518.393 0 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 ITotalCO21 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 x0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0509 0.0681 0.7196 2.3200e- 003 0.2012 1.3700e- 003 0.2026 0.0534 1.2700e- 003 0.0546 173.3698 7.9400e- 003 173.5366 Total 0.0509 0.0681 0.7196 2.3200e- 003 0.2012 1.3700e- 003 0.2026 0.0534 1.2700e- 003 0.0546 173.3698 7.9400e- 003 173.5366 21 of 27 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG I NOx CO SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 0.3562 7.2243 10.9827 0.0155 0.3968 0.3968 0.3968 0.3968 =7�� 1,508.7071 0.4612 0.0000 1,518.393 0 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.3562 7.2243 10.9827 0.0155 0.3968 0.3968 0.3968 0.3968 1,508.7071 0.4612 0.0000 1,518.393 0 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 ITotaICO21 CH4 I 7TO I CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �[n 0.0000 In 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0509 0.0681 0.7196 2.3200e- 003 0.2012 1.3700e- 003 0.2026 0.0534 1.2700e- 003 0.0546 1 173.3698 7.9400e- 003 173.5366 Total 0.0509 0.0681 0.7196 2.3200e- 003 0.2012 1.3700e- 003 0.2026 0.0534 1.2700e- 003 0.0546 173.3698 7.9400e- 003 173.5366 22 of 27 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- 0.00 0.00 CH4 N20 CO2e 999.00 1,000.50 727.50 2,291,747 I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 jTotalCO21 I I Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated 2.6303 5.1718 24.3349 0.0682 5.0448 0.0749 5.1198 1.3461 0.0692 1.4153 5,395.2500 0.2059 5,399.573 0 Unmitigated 2.6303 5.1718 24.3349 0.0682 5.0448 0.0749 5.1198 1.3461 0.0692 1.4153 5,395.2500 0.2059 5,399.573 0 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 11 61.60 19.00 58 Hotel 999.00 1,000.50 727.50 2,291,747 2,291,747 Total 999.00 1,000.50 727.50 2,291,747 1 2,291,747 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.509471 0.056616 0.192725 0.151095 0.041772 0.005913 0.015766 0.015535 0.001447 0.002155 0.004735 0.000502 0.002269 23 of 27 Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H-0 or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 11 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 LDA LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.509471 0.056616 0.192725 0.151095 0.041772 0.005913 0.015766 0.015535 0.001447 0.002155 0.004735 0.000502 0.002269 23 of 27 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 7TO CO2e s Use I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Total CO2 I Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas 0.1819 1.6535 1.3890 9.9200e- 0.1257 0.1257 0.1257 0.1257 3,273.038 1,984.2099 0.0380 0.0364 1,996.285 Mitigated 003 6 8 4 NaturalGas 0.3000 2.7275 2.2911 0.0164 0.2073 0.2073 0.2073 0.2073 0.0000 3,273.0386 0.0627 0.0600 3,292.957 Unmitigated 8 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Hotel 27820.8 0.3000 2.7275 2.2911 0.0164 0.2073 0.2073 0.2073 0.2073 3,273.038 0.0627 0.0600 3,292.957 6 8 Enclosed Parking 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator Total 0.3000 2.7275 2.2911 0.0164 0.2073 0.2073 0.2073 0.2073 3,273.038 0.0627 0.0600 3,292.957 6 8 24 of 27 Mitigated NaturalGa I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total To CO2 I Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Enclosed Parking 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.2703 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator 0.1061 2.9000e- 0.1122 004 �� 004 Hotel 16.8658 0.1819 1.6535 1.3890 9.9200e- 0.1257 0.1257 0.1257 0.1257 9.2703 1,984.209 0.0380 0.0364 11,996.285 0.0000 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.1061 2.9000e- 0.1122 9 4 Total 0.1819 1.6535 1.3890 9.9200e- 004 0.1257 0.1257 004 0.1257 0.1257 004 1,984.209 0.0380 0.0364 1,996.285 003 9 4 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 25 of 27 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 To CO2 I 1 1 Category - Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated 9.2703 4.6000e- 0.0500 0.0000 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.1061 2.9000e- 0.1122 004 004 004 004 004 004 Unmitigated 9.2703 4.6000e- 0.0500 0.0000 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.1061 2.9000e- 0.1122 004 004 004 004 004 004 25 of 27 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 720 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 0.9914 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 8.2741 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 4.7400e- 4.6000e- 0.0500 0.0000 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.1061 2.9000e- 0.1122 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 Total 9.2702 4.6000e- 0.0500 0.0000 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- J 0.1061 2.9000e- 0.1122 004 004 004 004 004 004 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 720 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 1 1 SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural 0.9914 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 8.2741 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 4.7400e- 4.6000e- 0.0500 0.0000 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.1061 2.9000e- 0.1122 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 Total 9.2702 4.6000e- 0.0500 0.0000 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.1061 2.9000e- 0.1122 004 004 004 004 004 004 26 of 27 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 27 of 27 1 of 11 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 1 FEIR 1054 - 030315 Orange County, Annual Date: 3/3/2015 4:26 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Condo/Townhouse High Rise 120.00 Dwelling Unit 1.88 120,000.00 343 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 480.00 Space 4.32 192,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 8 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity 0.029 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - GHG calculations only Land Use - 120 du high rise 480 space garage w/elevator Vehicle Trips - 1110 weekday ADT per FEIR 1054 Sat and Sun apportioned per CalEEMod Woodstoves - Woodstoves - No wood fireplaces Area Coating - No non-residential repainting; Min residential exterior repaint Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - All Tier 3 const to see NOx reduction Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Operational Year 2018 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) 1 of 11 PZ*Ma Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblVehicleTrips ST -TR 7.16 10.70 tblVehicleTrips SU -TR 6.07 9.07 tblVehicleTrips WD -TR 6.59 9.25 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational 2of11 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 ITMO CO2e I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 39.2737 0.0401 8. e- 40.3829 004 Energy 620.1697 0.0258 6.7900e- 622.8169 003 Mobile 1,481.4116 0.0557 0.0000 1,482.581 7 Waste 11.2051 0.6622 0.0000 25.1114 Water 47.2845 0.2568 6.4400e- 54.6747 003 Total 2,199.3445 1.0406 0.0141 2,225.567 6 2of11 3of11 Mitigated Operational 3of11 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To Total CO2 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 39.2737 0.0401 8.7000e- 40.3829 77 004 Energy 620.1697 0.0258 6.7900e- 622.8169 003 Mobile 1,477.9916 0.0556 0.0000 1,479.159 2 Waste 11.2051 0.6622 0.0000 25.1114 Water 47.2845 0.2568 6.4300e- 54.6708 003 Total 2,195.9245 1.0404 0.0141 2,222.141 1 3of11 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.02 0.07 0.15 Reduction 3of11 4of11 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Density ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 1,477.9916 0.0556 0.0000 1,479.159 2 Unmitigated 1,481.4116 0.0557 0.0000 1,482.581 7 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Condo/Townhouse High Rise 1,110.00 1,284.00 1088.40 3,867,435 3,858,280 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1,110.00 1,284.00 1,088.40 3,867,435 3,858,280 4.3 Trip Type Information 4of11 Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Condo/Townhouse High Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 11 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4of11 5of11 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 I 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking 1 0 518.8308 0.0239 4.9300e- 520.8612 Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator 003 Electricity Condo/Townhouse 1.89902e+ 518.8308 0.0239 4.9300e- 520.8612 Unmitigated 1.8600e- 101.9557 High Rise 006 003 NaturalGas 003 Total 101.3390 1.9400e- 1.8600e- 101.9557 Mitigated 101.9557 003 003 003 NaturalGas 101.3390 1.9400e- 1.8600e- 101.9557 Unmitigated FT 003 003 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking 1 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator Condo/Townhouse 1.89902e+ 101.3390 1.9400e- 1.8600e- 101.9557 High Rise 006 003 003 Total 101.3390 1.9400e- 1.8600e- 101.9557 003 003 5of11 6of11 Mitigated 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Condo/Townhouse s Use 148.5079 6.8300e- 1.4100e- PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Enclosed Parking1.29408e+ 370.3229 0.0170 3.5200e- Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking 0 003 Totali 1 518.8308 0.0239 4.9300e- 520.8612 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator Condo/Townhouse 1.89902e+ 101.3390 1.9400e -I 1.8600e- 101.9557 High Rise 006 003 003 Total 101.3390 1.9400e- 1.8600e- 101.9557 003 003 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Condo/Townhouse 518956 148.5079 6.8300e- 1.4100e- 149.0891 High Rise 003 003 Enclosed Parking1.29408e+ 370.3229 0.0170 3.5200e- 371.7721 with Elevator 006 003 Totali 1 518.8308 0.0239 4.9300e- 520.8612 003 7of11 Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG ElectricityTotal CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 Use Exhaust PM2.5 I I Land Use kWh/yr CO2e MT/yr I Condo/Townhouse 518956 148.5079 6.8300e- 1.4100e- 149.0891 High Rise Total 003 003 Enclosed Parking 1.29408e+370.3229 MT/yr 0.0170 3.5200e- 371.7721 with Elevator 006 003 Total 518.8308 0.0239 4.9300e- 520.8612 8.7000e- 40.3829 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG N77 SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 39.2737 0.0401 8.7000e- 40.3829 004 Unmitigated 39.2737 0.0401 8.7000e- 40.3829 004 7of11 8of11 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 72O CO2e I PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 ITotalCO21 I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products IL Hearth 37.2403 37.2403 0.0380 8.7000e- 38.3067 r.0380 004 004 Landscaping 2.0334 2.0400e- 2.0334 2.0400e- 0.0000 2.0761 003 003 Total Total 39.2737 0.0401 39.2737 0.0401 8.7000e- 40.3829 004 004 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 72O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth 37.2403 8.7000e- 38.3067 r.0380 004 Landscaping 2.0334 2.0400e- 0.0000 2.0761 003 Total 39.2737 0.0401 8.7000e- 40.3829 004 8of11 9of11 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Total CO2 C74 N2O I CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 47.2845 0.2568 6.4300e- 003 54.6708 Unmitigated 47.2845 0.2568 6.4400e- 003 54.6747 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated 9of11 Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Condo/Townhouse 7.81848 / 47.2845 0.2568 6.4400e- 54.6747 High Rise 4.92904 003 Enclosed Parking 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator Total 47.2845 0.2568 6.4400e- 54.6747 003 9of11 10 of 11 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Mitigated 11.2051 door Use 0.0000 25.1114 Unmitigated 11.2051 Land Use Mgal 25.1114 MT/yr Condo/Townhouse 7.81848 / 47.2845 0.2568 6.4300e- 54.6708 High Rise 4.92904 003 Enclosed Parking 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator Total 47.2845 0.2568 6.4300e- 54.6708 003 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 C74 N20 I CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 11.2051 0.6622 0.0000 25.1114 Unmitigated 11.2051 0.6622 0.0000 25.1114 11 of 11 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Mitigated Waste Disposed CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use OWasteotal MT/yr 11.2051 0.6622 Condo/Townhouse11.2051 High Rise 25.1114 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.6622 0.0000 25.1114 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Totali 1 11.2051 0.6622 0.0000 25.1114 Mitigated iii Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 I N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Condo/Townhouse High Rise 55.2 11.2051 0.6622 0.0000 25.1114 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 11.2051 0.6622 0.0000 25.1114 iii CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 1 Starwood Addendum 3350 Avenue of the Arts; Costa Mesa, CA Orange County, Annual Date: 7/20/2016 4:26 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 335.00 Space 1.50 134,000.00 0 Hotel 150.00 Room 1.50 283,886.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Climate Zone 8 Operational Year Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 512.9 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - SCE Manual Calcs for 2019. Land Use - Hotel- 150 rooms- sq ft 283,886 -_- --- - -- -_ --11 Construction Phase - Demo: 10/1/17-11/24/17 Off-road Equipment -defaults A����� Off-road Equipment - Defaults Off-road Equipment - Default Off-road Equipment - defaults Off-road Equipment - Defaults Trips and VMT - Defaults except grading and demo. 1,936 total hauling trips for grading. 490 trips for demo Demolition - estimate, based on parking garage aerials 1 of 32 30 2019 0.006 Grading - 29,040 Based on data from 7/15. 15 CY trucks, total of 1,936 truckloads Architectural Coating - Brought VOC to 100 int and 250 ext g/L for nonres. Int/ext sqft: manual calcs. 425,829 (int) and 50% of total ext: 40,972 (ext) Vehicle Trips - Traffic memo 3/25/16 and manual calcs Area Coating - Interior/ext: 425,829/79792 sqft, Brought VOC to 100 int/250 ext g/L for nonres. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Tier 3 equipment for all Energy Mitigation - Title 24 compliance Water Mitigation - Standard Waste Mitigation - standard Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 208,943.00 40,972.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 626,829.00 425,829.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_ Non residential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblAreaCoating Area_ EF_ Nonresidential -Interior 250 100 tblAreaCoating Area -Nonresidential -Exterior 208943 141943 tblAreaCoating Area_ Non residential_Interior 626829 425829 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 2 of 32 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 63.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays 220.00 352.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 40.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays 6.00 20.00 tblConstruction Phase NumDays 10.00 12.00 tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 7/26/2019 4/30/2019 tblCon structionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/16/2019 4/30/2019 tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate 5/1/2019 2/1/2019 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/11/2019 4/14/2019 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 3.00 tblGrading Material Exported 0.00 29,040.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet 217,800.00 283,886.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.01 1.50 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.00 1.50 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO21ntensityFactor 630.89 512.9 3 of 32 tblProjectCharacteristics Operationaffear 2014 2019 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 3,630.00 1,936.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripN umber 35.00 15.00 tblVehicleTrips ST -TR 8.19 6.67 tblVehicleTrips SU -TR 5.95 4.85 tblVehicleTrips WD -TR 8.17 6.66 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 770 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I I 1 1 Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 0.1493 1.6204 1.2980 2.2100e- 0.1481 0.0722 0.2204 0.0502 0.0670 0.1172 198.7310 0.0310 0.0000 199.3824 003 2018 0.4845 3.8002 4.2416 8.4000e- 0.3068 0.2070 0.5138 0.0826 0.1944 0.2769 687.4901 0.0865 0.0000 689.3056 003 2019 1.3833 1.2567 1.4835 3.0400e- 0.1075 0.0664 0.1739 0.0289 0.0626 0.0915 243.8622 0.0314 0.0000 244.5205 003 Total 2.0171 6.6772 7.0231 0.0137 0.5624 0.3457 0.9080 0.1616 0.3240 0.4856 1,130.0833 0.1488 0.0000 1,133.208 5 4 of 32 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 72O CO2e N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total PM2.5 CO2 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 0.0539 0.8994 1.0746 2.2100e- 0.0841 0.0326 0.1167 0.0273 0.0322 0.0595 14.15 35.62 198.7309 0.0310 0.0000 199.3823 0.00 0.00 0.00 003 2018 0.2238 2.6144 4.2786 8.4000e- 0.3068 0.1297 0.4364 0.0826 0.1287 0.2113 687.4897 0.0865 0.0000 689.3053 003 2019 1.3006 0.9314 1.5199 3.0400e- 0.1075 0.0479 0.1554 0.0289 0.0476 0.0765 243.8621 0.0314 0.0000 244.5203 003 Total 1.5783 4.4452 6.8731 0.0137 0.4983 0.2102 0.7085 0.1387 0.2086 0.3473 1,130.0827 0.1488 0.0000 1,133.207 8 5 of 32 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MID PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 21.75 33.43 2.14 0.00 11.39 39.19 21.97 14.15 35.62 28.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 5 of 32 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational 6 of 32 ROG I NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 To Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 t2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 1.6916 6.00OOe- 005 6.2500e- 003 0.0000 2.00OOe- 005 2.00OOe- 005 2.00OOe- 005 2.00OOe- 005 0.0120 3.00OOe- 005 0.0000 0.0127 Energy 0.0548 0.4978 0.4181 2.9900e- 003 0.0378 0.0378 0.0378 0.0378 _][_ 1,418.4040 0.0600 0.0202 1,425.921 2 Mobile 0.4320 0.9205 4.2587 0.0121 0.8658 0.0130 0.8789 0.2314 0.0120 0.2434 864.7884 0.0326 0.0000 865.4725 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 16.6717 r9853 0.0000 37.3622 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13.8265 0.1247 3.0800e- 003 17.3985 Total 2.1783 1.4183 4.6830 0.0151 0.8658 0.0509 0.9167 0.2314 0.0499 0.2813 2,313.7026 1.2025 0.0233 2,346.167 1 6 of 32 Mitigated Operational 7 of 32 ROG NOx CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 To Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 720 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 1.6916 6.00OOe- 005 6.250Oe- 003 0.0000 Total 2.00OOe- 005 2.00OOe- 005 Total 2.00OOe- 005 2.00OOe- 005 0.0120 3.00OOe- 005 0.0000 0.0127 Energy 0.0332 0.3018 0.2535 1.8100e- 003 1.63 0.0229 0.0229 5.30 0.0229 0.0229 16.57 44.13 1,045.8185 0.0469 0.0144 1,051.270 7 Mobile 0.4320 0.9205 4.2587 0.0121 0.8658 0.0130 0.8789 0.2314 0.0120 0.2434 864.7884 0.0326 0.0000 865.4725 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.3358 0.4926 0.0000 18.6811 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11.2797 0.0998 2.4600e- 003 14.1369 Total 2.1567 1.2223 4.5184 0.0139 0.8658 0.0360 0.9018 0.2314 0.0350 0.2664 1,930.2345 0.6718 0.0169 1,949.573 9 7 of 32 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.99 13.82 3.52 7.84 0.00 29.28 1.63 0.00 29.87 5.30 0.00 0.00 16.57 44.13 27.50 16.90 Reduction 7 of 32 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Number Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/1/2017 11/24/2017 5 40 0.73 2 Grading/Excavation Grading 11/25/2017 12/22/2017 5 20 0.38 3 Building Construction Building Construction 12/23/2017 4/30/2019 5 352 0.40 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/1/2019 4/30/2019 5 63 Grading/Excavation 5 (Paving Paving 4/14/2019 4/30/2019 5 12i Rubber Tired Dozers Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 425,829; Non -Residential Outdoor: 40,972 (Architectural Coating — OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 162 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Grading/Excavation Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38 Grading/Excavation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Grading/Excavation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Grading/Excavation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00I 46 0.45 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00I 78 0.48 8 of 32 Paving (Cement and Mortar Mixers 277 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42 Paving (Paving Equipment 2 6.00 130 0.36 Paving 'Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Count Number Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor TripHauling Length Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Hauling Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 490.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT Grading/Excavation 6 15.00 0.00 1,936.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD -Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 176.00 68.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 711 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area 9 of 32 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To 1 CO2 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.4000e- Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 4.200Oe- 9.3000e- 5.1300e- 0.0531 0.0000 0.0531 8.030Oe- 0.0000 8.0300e- 1.200Oe- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 0.08100.8539 0.0000 0.6779 8.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0425 0.0425 0.0000 0.0396 0.0396J 0.0000 0.0000 73.2364 0.0201 0.0000 73.6583 4.00OOe- 3.290Oe- 2.00OOe- 004 8.700Oe- 2.00OOe- 9.00OOe- 2.8537 1.300Oe- 0.0000 2.8565 004 003 Total 0.0810 J 0.8539 0.6779 8.00OOe- 0.0531 0.0425 0.0956 8.0300e- 0.0396 0.0476 004 73.2364 0.0201 0.0000 73.6583 2.2000e- 7.4900e- 9.5OOOe- 004 2.0200e- 8.8000e- 003 19.0426 2.5OOOe- 0.0000 19.0478 003 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.4000e- 0.0652 0.0524 1.800Oe- 4.200Oe- 9.3000e- 5.1300e- 1.150Oe- 8.600Oe- 2.0100e- 16.1889 1.200Oe- 0.0000 16.1914 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.3000e- 1.380Oe- 0.0144 4.00OOe- 3.290Oe- 2.00OOe- 3.3200e- 8.700Oe- 2.00OOe- 9.00OOe- 2.8537 1.300Oe- 0.0000 2.8565 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Total 5.3300e- 0.0665 0.0668 2.2000e- 7.4900e- 9.5OOOe- 8.4500e- 2.0200e- 8.8000e- 2.9100e- 19.0426 2.5OOOe- 0.0000 19.0478 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 10 of 32 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 1 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0652 0.0524 1.8000e- 0.0239 0.0000 0.0239 3.6200e- 0.0000 3.6200e-0.0000 16.1889 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 Off -Road 0.0190 0.3752 0.5053 8.00OOe- [6.0000 0.0176 0.0176 [6.6000 0.0176 0.0176 73.2363 0.0201 0.0000 73.6583 0.0000 Worker 9.3000e- 1.3800e- 004 4.00OOe- 3.2900e- 2.00OOe- 3.3200e- 8.7000e- 2.00OOe- 9.00OOe- 2.8537 1.3000e- 0.0000 Total 0.0190 0.3752 0.5053 8.00OOe- 0.0239 0.0176 0.0415 3.6200e- 0.0176 0.0213 004 73.2363 0.0201 0.0000 73.6583 Total 5.3300e- 0.0665 004 2.2000e- 7.4900e- 9.5000e- 003 2.0200e- 8.8000e- 2.9100e- 19.0426 2.5000e- 0.0000 Mitiaated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.4000e- 0.0652 0.0524 1.8000e- 4.2000e- 9.3000e- 5.1300e- 1.1500e- 8.6000e- 2.0100e- 16.1889 1.2000e- 0.0000 16.1914 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 [6.0000 [77 [6.6000 [-o.mT.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.3000e- 1.3800e- 0.0144 4.00OOe- 3.2900e- 2.00OOe- 3.3200e- 8.7000e- 2.00OOe- 9.00OOe- 2.8537 1.3000e- 0.0000 2.8565 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 Total 5.3300e- 0.0665 0.0668 2.2000e- 7.4900e- 9.5000e- 8.4500e- 2.0200e- 8.8000e- 2.9100e- 19.0426 2.5000e- 0.0000 19.0478 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 11 of 32 3.3 Grading/Excavation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Bio- CO2 To NBio- CO2 Total CO2 1 CH4 720 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust PM10 0.0635 0.0000 0.0635 0.0335 0.0000 0.0335 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 0.0346 0.3598 0.2538 3.000Oe- 004 3.6700e- 0.0204 0.0204 3.38OOe- 0.0188 0.0188 63.9628 27.6117 8.4600e- 003 0.0000 27.7893 Total 0.0346 0.3598 0.2538 3.000Oe- 004 0.0635 0.0204 0.0838 0.0335 0.0188 0.0523 J 27.6117 8.4600e- 003 0.0000 27.7893 Unmitiaated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0174 0.2574 0.2069 7.1000e- 0.0166 3.6700e- 0.0203 4.5500e- 3.38OOe- 7.9300e- 63.9628 4.6000e- 0.0000 63.9724 004 003 003 003 003 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 [7[obboo 0.0000 [-obdT.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7000e- 6.9000e- 7.2100e- 2.000Oe- 1.6500e- 1.000Oe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.000Oe- 4.5000e- 1.4268 7.000Oe- 0.0000 1.4283 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 0.0179 0.2581 0.2141 7.3000e- 0.0183 3.6800e- 0.0219 4.9900e- 3.3900e- 8.3800e- 65.3896 5.3000e- 0.0000 65.4006 004 003 003 003 003 I 004 12 of 32 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Bio- CO2 To NBio- CO2 Total CO2 1 CH4 720 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust PM10 0.0286 0.0000 0.0286 0.0151 0.0000 0.0151 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 7.2500e- 003 0.1482 0.2038 3.00OOe- 004 3.6700e- 7.8500e- 003 7.8500e- 003 3.3800e- 7.8500e- 003 7.8500e- 003 63.9628 27.6117 8.4600e- 003 0.0000 27.7893 Total 7.2500e- 003 0.1482 0.2038 3.00OOe- 004 0.0286 7.8500e- 003 0.0364 0.0151 7.8500e- 003 0.0229 27.6117 8.4600e- 003 0.0000 27.7893 Mitiaated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0174 0.2574 0.2069 7.1000e- 0.0166 3.6700e- 0.0203 4.5500e- 3.3800e- 7.9300e- 63.9628 4.6000e- 0.0000 63.9724 004 003 003 003 003 004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 [7[obboo 0.0000 [-obdT.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7000e- 6.9000e- 7.2100e- 2.00OOe- 1.6500e- 1.00OOe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.00OOe- 4.5000e- 1.4268 7.00OOe- 0.0000 1.4283 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 0.0179 0.2581 0.2141 7.3000e- 0.0183 3.6800e- 0.0219 4.9900e- 3.3900e- 8.3800e- 65.3896 5.3000e- 0.0000 65.4006 004 003 003 003 003 I 004 13 of 32 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 To CO2 I 1 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 7.7600e- 0.0660 0.0453 7.000Oe- 0.0000 4.4500e- 4.4500e- 0.0000 4.1800e- 4.1800e- 0.0000 5.9870 1.4700e- 0.0000 6.0179 003 Vendor 1.4600e- 0.0140 005 4.000Oe- 003 003 2.1000e- 003 003 1.9000e- 4.9000e- 003 3.2783 2.000Oe- Total 7.7600e- 0.0660 0.0453 7.000Oe- 4.4500e- 4.4500e- 003 4.1800e- 4.1800e- 004 004 5.9870 1.4700e- 0.0000 6.0179 003 005 2.0200e- 003 003 6.000Oe- 003 003 4.8600e- 1.2800e- 3.000Oe- 003 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.4600e- 0.0140 0.0190 4.000Oe- 1.0500e- 2.1000e- 1.2600e- 3.000Oe- 1.9000e- 4.9000e- 3.2783 2.000Oe- 0.0000 3.2788 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 005 Worker 1.3700e- 2.0200e- 0.0211 6.000Oe- 4.8300e- 3.000Oe- 4.8600e- 1.2800e- 3.000Oe- 1.3100e- 4.1854 2.000Oe- 0.0000 4.1895 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Total 2.8300e- 0.0160 0.0401 1.000Oe- 5.8800e- 2.4000e- 6.1200e- 1.5800e- 2.2000e- 1.8000e- 7.4637 2.2000e- 0.0000 7.4683 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 14 of 32 Mitiaated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I CO2 I I 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 1.6800e- 0.0354 1 0.0445 7.00OOe- 0.0000 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 0.0000 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 5.9870 1.4700e- 0.0000 6.0179 003 0.0140 0.0190 005 1.0500e- 003 003 3.00OOe- 003 003 3.2783 003 0.0000 3.2788 Total 1.6800e- 0.0354 0.0445 7.00OOe- 003 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 004 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 5.9870 1.4700e- 0.0000 6.0179 003 2.0200e- 0.0211 005 4.8300e- 003 003 1.2800e- 003 003 4.1854 003 0.0000 4.1895 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 00 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.4600e- 0.0140 0.0190 4.00OOe- 1.0500e- 2.1000e- 1.2600e- 3.00OOe- 1.9000e- 4.9000e- 3.2783 2.00OOe- 0.0000 3.2788 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 005 Worker 1.3700e- 2.0200e- 0.0211 6.00OOe- 4.8300e- 3.00OOe- 4.8600e- 1.2800e- 3.00OOe- 1.3100e- 4.1854 2.00OOe- 0.0000 4.1895 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Total 2.8300e- 0.0160 0.0401 1.00OOe- 5.8800e- 2.4000e- 6.1200e- 1.5800e- 2.2000e- 1.8000e- 7.4637 2.2000e- 0.0000 7.4683 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 004 15 of 32 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e I I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I CO2 I I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.3483 3.0355 2.2880 3.5000e- 0.0000 0.1950 0.1950 0.0000 0.1833 0.1833 0.0000 0.0000 308.9844 0.0756 0.0000 310.5723 1.9100e- 0.0103 003 9.4500e- 0.0250 168.2212 1.2100e-000000030.0546 Total 0.3483 3.0355 2.2880 3.5000e- �Ln 0.1950 0.1950 0.1833 0.1833 003 308.9844 0.0756 0.0000 310.5723 2.9900e- 0.2521 1.7300e- 003 0.0670 1.6000e- 0.0686 210.2845 9.6300e- 0.0000 210.4867 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0713 0.6684 0.9457 1.9100e- 0.0103 00649003 9.4500e- 0.0250 168.2212 1.2100e-000000030.0546 �Ln 003 Worker 0.0649 0.0963 1.0079 2.9900e- 0.2521 1.7300e- 0.2539 0.0670 1.6000e- 0.0686 210.2845 9.6300e- 0.0000 210.4867 003 003 003 003 Total 0.1362 0.7647 1.9536 4.9000e- 0.3068 0.0120 0.3188 0.0826 0.0111 0.0936 378.5057 0.0108 0.0000 378.7333 003 1 16 of 32 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.0876 1.8497 2.3249 3.5000e- 0.0000 0.1177 0.1177 0.0000 0.1177 0.1177 0.0000 0.0000 308.9841 0.0756 0.0000 310.5720 1.9100e- 0.0546 003 0.0649 0.0156 9.4500e-0.0250 168.2212 1.2100e- 0.0000 168.2466 Total 0.0876 1.8497 2.3249 3.5000e- 0.1177 0.1177 0.1177 0.1177 003 308.9841 0.0756 0.0000 310.5720 2.9900e- 0.2521 003 0.2539 0.0670 1.6000e- 0.0686 210.2845 9.6300e- 0.0000 210.4867 Mitiaated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0713 0.6684 0.9457 1.9100e- 0.0546 0.0103 0.0649 0.0156 9.4500e-0.0250 168.2212 1.2100e- 0.0000 168.2466 003 003 003 Worker 0.0649 0.0963 1.0079 2.9900e- 0.2521 1.7300e- 0.2539 0.0670 1.6000e- 0.0686 210.2845 9.6300e- 0.0000 210.4867 003 003 003 003 Total 0.1362 0.7647 1.9536 4.9000e- 0.3068 0.0120 0.3188 0.0826 0.0111 0.0936 378.5057 0.0108 0.0000 378.7333 003 17 of 32 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 To CO2 1 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1011 0.9015 0.7362 1.1500e- 0.0000 0.0553 0.0553 0.0000 0.0520 0.0520 0.0000 100.6728 0.0245 0.0000 101.1872 0.0000 Vendor 0.0220 0.2042 003 6.3000e- 0.0180 3.1600e- 0.0212 5.1400e- 2.9000e- 8.0400e- 54.6588 4.000Oe- Total 0.1011 0.9015 0.7362 1.1500e- 0.0553 0.0553 0.0520 0.0520 003 003 100.6728 0.0245 0.0000 101.1872 004 003 0.0294 0.3094 9.9000e- 0.0831 5.8000e- 0.0837 0.0221 5.3000e- 0.0226 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0220 0.2042 0.2971 6.3000e- 0.0180 3.1600e- 0.0212 5.1400e- 2.9000e- 8.0400e- 54.6588 4.000Oe- 0.0000 54.6673 004 003 003 003 003 004 Worker 0.0200 0.0294 0.3094 9.9000e- 0.0831 5.8000e- 0.0837 0.0221 5.3000e- 0.0226 67.1268 3.0300e- 0.0000 67.1904 004 004 004 003 Total 0.0419 0.2336 0.6065 1.6200e- 0.1011 3.7400e- 0.1048 0.0272 3.4300e- 0.0306 121.7857 3.4300e- 0.0000 121.8577 003 003 003 003 18 of 32 Mitiaated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 72O CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I CO2 I I 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.0289 0.6095 1 0.7661 1.1500e- 0.0000 0.0388 0.0388 0.0000 0.0388 0.0388 100.6727 0.0245 0.0000 101.1871 Vendor 0.0220 0.2042 0.2971 003 0.0180 3.1600e- 0.0212 5.1400e- 2.9000e- 8.0400e-4.00OOe- 0.0000 54.6673 Total 0.0289 0.6095 0.7661 1.1500e- 0.0388 0.0388 003 0.0388 0.0388 L 100.6727 0.0245 0.0000 101.1871 Worker 0.0200 0.0294 0.3094 003 0.0831 5.8000e- 0.0837 0.0221 5.3000e- 0.0226 -L-177 67.1268 3.0300e- 0.0000 67.1904 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 00 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0220 0.2042 0.2971 6.3000e- 0.0180 3.1600e- 0.0212 5.1400e- 2.9000e- 8.0400e-4.00OOe- 0.0000 54.6673 004 003 003 003 003 L 004 Worker 0.0200 0.0294 0.3094 9.9000e- 0.0831 5.8000e- 0.0837 0.0221 5.3000e- 0.0226 -L-177 67.1268 3.0300e- 0.0000 67.1904 004 004 004 003 Total 0.0419 0.2336 0.6065 1.6200e- 0.1011 3.7400e- 0.1048 0.0272 3.4300e- 0.0306 121.7857 3.4300e- 0.0000 121.8577 003 003 003 003 19 of 32 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Bio- CO2 To NBio- CO2 Total CO2 1 CH4 720 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 1.2242 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 8.3900e- 003 0.0578 0.0580 9.00OOe- 005 0.0000 4.0600e- 003 4.0600e- 003 0.0000 4.060Oe- 003 4.0600e- 003 8.0428 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.0570 Total 1.2326 0.0578 0.0580 9.00OOe- 005 5.1900e- 003 4.0600e- 003 4.0600e- 003 1.3800e- 003 4.0600e- 003 4.0600e- 003 8.0428 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.0570 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Bio- CO2 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 72O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 x0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2500e- 003 1.8400e- 003 0.0193 6.00OOe- 005 5.1900e- 003 4.00OOe- 005 5.2200e- 003 1.3800e- 003 3.00OOe- 005 1.4100e- 003 4.1910 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 4.1950 Total 1.2500e- 003 1.8400e- 003 0.0193 6.00OOe- 005 5.1900e- 003 4.00OOe- 005 5.2200e- 003 1.3800e- 003 3.00OOe- 005 1.4100e- 003 4.1910 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 4.1950 20 of 32 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Bio- CO2 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 1.2242 MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road 1.8700e- 003 0.0427 0.0577 9.0000e- 005 Vendor 0.00000.0000 3.00OOe- 3.00OOe- 003 003 0.0000 3.000Oe- 003 3.0000e- 003 0.0000 8.0427 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.0570 Total 1.2261 0.0427 0.0577 9.00OOe- 005 0.0000 3.00OOe- 3.00OOe- 003 003 Worker 1.2500e- 003 3.00OOe- 003 3.00OOe- 003 J 6.000Oe- 005 8.0427 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.0570 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG I NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �� 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2500e- 003 1.8400e- 003 0.0193 6.000Oe- 005 5.1900e- 003 4.00OOe- 005 5.2200e- 003 1.3800e- 003 3.00OOe- 005 1.4100e- 003 4.1910 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 4.1950 Total 1.2500e- 003 1.8400e- 003 0.0193 6.00OOe- 005 5.1900e- 003 4.00OOe- 005 5.2200e- 003 1.3800e- 003 3.00OOe- 005 1.4100e- 003 J 4.1910 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 4.1950 21 of 32 3.6 Paving - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Bio- CO2 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 6.1200e- 003 0.0615 0.0591 9.000Oe- 005 0.0000 3.3300e- 3.3300e- 003 003 0.0000 3.0700e- 003 3.0700e- 003 0.0000 8.2121 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 8.2648 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 �� 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.1200e- 003 0.0615 0.0591 9.000Oe- 005 0.0000 3.3300e- 3.3300e- 003 003 Worker 2.9000e- 004 3.0700e- 003 3.0700e- 003 J 1.000Oe- 005 8.2121 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 8.2648 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG I NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �� 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.4200e- 003 1.000Oe- 005 1.1900e- 003 1.000Oe- 005 1.1900e- 003 3.1000e- 004 1.000Oe- 005 3.2000e- 004 0.9579 4.000Oe- 005 0.0000 0.9589 Total 2.9000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.4200e- 003 1.000Oe- 005 1.1900e- 003 1.000Oe- 005 1.1900e- 003 3.1000e- 004 1.000Oe- 005 3.2000e- 004 J 0.9579 4.000Oe- 005 0.0000 0.9589 22 of 32 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Bio- CO2 To NBio- CO2 Total CO2 1 CH4 720 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 2.1400e- 003 0.0434 0.0659 9.00OOe- 005 0.0000 2.3800e- 003 2.3800e- 003 0.0000 2.3800e- 003 2.3800e- 003 8.2121 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 8.2648 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.1400e- 003 0.0434 0.0659 9.00OOe- 005 1.1900e- 003 2.3800e- 003 2.3800e- 003 3.1000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 2.3800e- 003 8.2121 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 8.2648 Mitiaated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Bio- CO2 Total NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.4200e- 003 1.00OOe- 005 1.1900e- 003 1.00OOe- 005 1.1900e- 003 3.1000e- 004 1.00OOe- 005 3.2000e- 004 0.9579 4.00OOe- 005 0.0000 0.9589 Total 2.9000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.4200e- 003 1.00OOe- 005 1.1900e- 003 1.00OOe- 005 1.1900e- 003 3.1000e- 004 1.00OOe- 005 3.2000e- 004 0.9579 4.00OOe- 005 0.0000 0.9589 23 of 32 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 To Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 1 CH4 1 720 1 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.4320 0.9205 4.2587 0.0121 0.8658 0.0130 0.8789 0.2314 0.0120 0.2434 864.7884 0.0326 0.0000 865.4725 Unmitigated 0.4320 0.9205 4.2587 0.0121 0.8658 0.0130 0.8789 0.2314 0.0120 0.2434 864.7884 0.0326 0.0000 865.4725 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 Hotel 999.00 1,000.50 727.50 2,291,747 2,291,747 Total 999.00 1,000.50 727.50 2,291,747 2,291,747 4.3 Trip Type Information LDA LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.509471 0.056616 0.192725 0.151095 0.041772 0.005913 0.015766 0.015535 0.001447 0.002155 0.004735 0.000502 0.002269 24 of 32 Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C- H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary Diverted Pass -by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 LDA LDT1 I LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.509471 0.056616 0.192725 0.151095 0.041772 0.005913 0.015766 0.015535 0.001447 0.002155 0.004735 0.000502 0.002269 24 of 32 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2. I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 1 Category tans/yr MT/yr Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 717.3103 0.0406 8.3900e- 720.7633 Mitigated 003 Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 876.5158 0.0496 0.0103 880.7352 Unmitigated NaturalGas 0.0332 0.3018 0.2535 1.8100e- 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 328.5082 6.3000e- 6.0200e- 330.5074 Mitigated 003 003 003 NaturalGas 0.0548 0.4978 0.4181 2e- 0.0378 0.0378 0.0378 0.0378 541.8883 004 .01 9.9300e- 545.1861 Unmitigated 003.9900 003 25 of 32 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr 1 MT/yr Hotel 1.01546e+ 0.0548 0.4978 0.4181 2.9900e- 0.0378 0.0378 0.0378 0.0378 0.0229 541.8883 0.0104 9.9300e- 545.1861 007 006 003 003 003 003 Enclosed Parking 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator Totali 0.0548 0.4978 0.4181 2.9900e- 0.0332 1 0.0378 0.0378 0.0378 0.0378 0.0229 0.0229 541.8883 0.0104 9.9300e- 545.1861 1 6.3000e- 6.0200e- 003 003 003 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr 1 MT/yr Hotel 6.15601e+ 0.0332 0.3018 0.2535 1.8100e- 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 328.5082 6.3000e- 6.0200e- 330.5074 006 003 003 003 Enclosed Parking 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator Totali 0.0332 1 0.3018 0.2535 1.8100e- 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 0.0229 328.5082 6.3000e- 6.0200e- 330.5074 003 003 003 26 of 32 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Mitigated ElectricityTotal Use CO2 CH4 I N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr Use MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 903160 210.1179 0.0119 2.4600e- 003 211.1294 Hotel 2.86441e+666.3978 006 661531 0.0377 7.80OOe- 003 669.6058 Totali 1 876.5158 0.0496 0.0103 880.7352 Mitigated 27 of 32 ElectricityTotal CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking 661531 153.9036 8.7000e- 1.8000e- 154.6445 with Elevator 003 003 Hotel 2.42172e+ 563.4067 0.0319 6.5900e- 566.1188 006 003 Totali 1 717.3103 0.0406 8.3900e- 720.7633 003 27 of 32 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 1.6916 6.00OOe- 6.2500e- 0.0000 0.0007 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0120 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0127 Coating 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Unmitigated 1.6916 6.00OOe- 6.2500e- 0.0000 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0120 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0127 Products 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 I I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 0.1809 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 1.5100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 5.9000e- 6.00OOe- 6.2500e- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0120 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0127 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Total 1.6915 6.00OOe- 6.2500e- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- J 0.0120 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0127 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 28 of 32 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 7O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 I 1 1 Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 0.1809 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 1.5100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 5.9000e- 6.00OOe- 6.25OOe- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0120 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0127 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 Total 1.6915 6.00OOe- 6.2500e- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0120 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0127 005 003 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Total CO2 C7 N2O I CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 11.2797 0.0998 2.4600e- 003 14.1369 Unmitigated 13.8265 0.1247 3.0800e- 003 17.3985 29 of 32 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CO2e door Use I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 3.80502/ 13.8265 0.1247 3.0800e- 17.3985 0.422779 3.04401/ 003 0.0998 Totali 1 13.8265 0.1247 3.0800e- 17.3985 003 003 Mitigated 30 of 32 Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use I Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator Hotel 3.04401/ 11.2797 0.0998 2.4600e- 14.1369 0.422779 003 Total 11.2797 0.0998 2.4600e- 14.1369 003 30 of 32 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 I N2O I CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 8.3358 0.4926 0.0000 18.6811 Unmitigated [16.6717 0.9853 0.0000 37.3622 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated 31 of 32 Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 I N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 82.13 16.6717 0.9853 0.0000 37.3622 Total 16.6717 0.9853 0.0000 37.3622 31 of 32 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 32 of 32 Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 41.065 8.3358 0.4926 0.0000 18.6811 Totali 1 8.3358 0.4926 0.0000 18.6811 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 32 of 32 APPENDIX C EDR REPORT Starwood Tribute Hotel Project 3350 Avenue of The Arts Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Inquiry Number: 4671365.2s July 12, 2016 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 (rEDR www.edrnet.com FORM-LBE-RG TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map----------------------------------------------------------- 2 DetailMap-------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Map Findings Summary 4 MapFindings------------------------------------------------------------ 8 Orphan Summary 66 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GR -1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map------------------------------------------- A-6 Physical Setting Source Map------------------------------------------------ A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-10 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC4671365.2s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 33.6916550 - 33° 41'29.95" 117.8801570 - 117° 52' 48.56" Zone 11 418423.8 3728122.2 31 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: Version Date: East Map: Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 5640950 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 2012 5640942 TUSTIN, CA 2012 Portions of Photo from: 20140514 Source: USDA TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Target Property Address: 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP ID SITE NAME ADDRESS MAPPED SITES SUMMARY DATABASE ACRONYMS RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ELEVATION DIRECTION 1 THE WYNDHAM 3350 AVENUE OF THE A HAZNET A2 580 ANTON BLVD EDR Hist Cleaner Higher A3 OCEAN PARK CLEANERS 580 ANTON BLVD 213 RCRA-SQG, FINDS, DRYCLEANERS, HAZNET, NPDES, ECHOiigher B4 MARRIOTT SUITES 500 ANTON BLVD CA FID UST Higher B5 MARRIOTT SUITES 500 ANTON BLVD UST, SWEEPS UST Higher C6 SOUTH COAST METRO CE 575 ANTON BLVD CA FID UST Higher C7 METRO CENTER @SOUTH 575 ANTON BLVD UST, SWEEPS UST Higher D8 SEGERSTROM CENTER FO 600 TOWN CENTER DR UST Lower E9 METRO FIRE STATION 3350 SAKIOKA SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, HAZNET Higher E10 METRO FIRE STATION # 3350 SAKIOKA DR UST Higher D11 SEGERSTROM CENTER FO 615 TOWN CENTER DR UST Lower F12 METRO CENTER @ SOUTH 555 ANTON BLVD UST Higher F13 PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RE 555 ANTON BLVD CA FID UST, EMI Higher F14 SOUTH COAST METRO CE 555 ANTON BLVD 100 SWEEPS UST Higher G15 CENTER TOWER 650 TOWN CENTER DR UST, SWEEPS UST Lower G16 CENTER CLUB, INC 650 TOWN CENTER DR CA FID UST, EMI Lower 17 WESTIN SOUTH COAST P 686 ANTON BLVD UST Lower H18 SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO 3333 BRISTOL ST LUST Lower H19 G&M OIL COMPANY 3301 HIST CORTESE Lower 20 DOWNEY SAVINGS PLAZA 3200 BRISTOL LUST, HIST UST, EMI, HIST CORTESE Lower 21 UNOCAL # 3900 BRISTOL ST LUST, HIST CORTESE Lower 122 BRISTOL ONE DAY CLEA 3825 S BRISTOL ST RCRA-SQG, SLIC, FINDS, DRYCLEANERS, EMI, ECHO Lower 123 BRISTOL SHOPPING CEN 3825 SOUTH BRISTOL S SLIC Lower 24 SAKIOKA FARMS SWC OF SUNFLOWER AND SLIC Higher J25 CHEVRON #9-1921 3801 BRISTOL ST LUST, CHMIRS, HIST CORTESE Lower J26 CHEVRON #9-1921 3801 S BRISTOL ST LUST, CA FID UST, CHMIRS Lower J27 FIRESTONE STORE #278 3733 BRISTOL ST LUST, HIST CORTESE Lower 28 VALENTEC INTERNATION 3190 PULLMAN STREET ENVIROSTOR, SLIC, Orange Co. Industrial Site Higher 29 SHELL SERVICE STATIO 3045 BRISTOL LUST, Notify 65 Higher 30 ADVANCED PLATING TEC 150 E STEVENS AVE ENVIROSTOR, Orange Co. Industrial Site Higher 31 PRIME TECHNOLOGIES, 3183 REDHILL AVENUE ENVIROSTOR Higher 32 FRYE & SMITH, INC. 150 E. BAKER STREET ENVIROSTOR Higher 33 CERADYNE INC 3169 REDHILL AVE ENVIROSTOR, WDS Higher K34 SEMICOA 333 MCCORMICK AVENUE ENVIROSTOR, HAZNET Higher K35 SEMICOA 333 MCCORMICK RCRA-SQG, ENVIROSTOR, FINDS, WDS, ECHO Higher TP 539, 0.102, South 539, 0.102, South 590, 0.112, SSE 590, 0.112, SSE 718, 0.136, SE 718, 0.136, SE 729, 0.138, WNW 766, 0.145, East 766, 0.145, East 792, 0.150, WNW 934, 0.177, SE 934, 0.177, SE 934, 0.177, SE 976, 0.185, WNW 976, 0.185, WNW 1312, 0.248, WSW 1746, 0.331, WSW 1748, 0.331, WSW 1760, 0.333, WSW 2234, 0.423, NW 2277, 0.431, NW 2277, 0.431, NW 2525, 0.478, ENE 2542, 0.481, NW 2542, 0.481, NW 2575, 0.488, NW 3748, 0.710, SE 3795, 0.719, SSW 4070, 0.771, ENE 4284, 0.811, SE 4439, 0.841, South 4647, 0.880, SSE 4651, 0.881, SSE 4651, 0.881, SSE 4671365.2s Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: Site Database(s) EPA ID THE WYNDHAM HAZNET N/A 3350 AVENUE OF THE A GEPAID: CAC001448616 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL__________________________ National Priority List Proposed NPL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS------------------- Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL_________________ National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY ---------- Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS------------------------ Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS -ARCHIVE ------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF----------------- RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA - Large Quantity Generators TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RCRA-CESQG--------------- RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF______________________ Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing AST__________________________ Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP__________________________ Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT--------------- Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI__________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HIST Cal -Sites---------------. Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits--------------------. Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database Local Land Records LIENS------------------------ Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS----------------------- Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS------------------------- Military Cleanup Sites Listing Orange Co. Industrial Site____. List of Industrial Site Cleanups SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR--------. RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS_-----. State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION----------. 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS------------------------. Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS----------------------- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS-------------------------- Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER-------_ PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS-------------------- Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP--------------------- Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UMTRA______________________ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES -------------------- Mines Master Index File FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing UXO -------------------------- Unexploded Ordnance Sites CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings________________ CUPA Resources List EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Financial Assurance Information Listing HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES_______________________ Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC____________________ Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database UIC UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS--------- Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List ECHO________________________ Enforcement & Compliance History Information FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Auto________________ EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/09/2015 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation OCEAN PARK CLEANERS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page 580 ANTON BLVD 213 S 0 - 1/8 (0.102 mi.) A3 ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program's (SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly -contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/02/2016 has revealed that there are 7 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page VALENTEC INTERNATION 3190 PULLMAN STREET SE 1/2 - 1 (0.710 mi.) 28 48 Facility Id: 71002538 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation ADVANCED PLATING TEC 150 E STEVENS AVE ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.771 mi.) 30 53 Facility Id: 71003277 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation PRIME TECHNOLOGIES, 3183 REDHILL AVENUE SE 1/2 - 1 (0.811 mi.) 31 54 Facility Id: 71002874 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation FRYE & SMITH, INC. 150 E. BAKER STREET S 1/2 - 1 (0.841 mi.) 32 55 Facility Id: 71002615 Status: No Further Action CERADYNE INC 3169 REDHILL AVE SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.880 mi.) 33 56 Facility Id: 71002835 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation SEMICOA 333 MCCORMICK AVENUE SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.881 mi.) K34 58 TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Facility Id: 60002151 Status: Active SEMICOA 333 MCCORMICK SSE 112 - 1 (0.881 mi.) K35 60 Facility Id: 71002417 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/14/2016 has revealed that there are 6 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO 3333 BRISTOL ST Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605900596 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605900596 Facility Id: 88UT015 DOWNEY SAVINGS PLAZA 3200 BRISTOL Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605900829 Current Status: 9 Global ID: T0605900829 Facility Id: 89UT173 UNOCAL # 3900 BRISTOL ST Facility Status: Preliminary site assessment underway Global ID: T0605901808 CHEVRON #9-1921 3801 BRISTOL ST Facility Status: Remediation Plan Global ID: T0605900929 CHEVRON #9-1921 3801 S BRISTOL ST Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605900929 FIRESTONE STORE #278 3733 BRISTOL ST Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901709 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.331 mi.) H18 21 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.333 mi.) 20 24 NW 1/4 - 112 (0.423 mi.) 21 28 NW 114 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.) J25 34 NW 114 - 112 (0.481 mi.) J26 39 NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.488 mi.) J27 47 TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. A review of the SLIC list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/14/2016 has revealed that there are 3 SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SAKIOKA FARMS SWC OF SUNFLOWER AND ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.478 mi.) 24 33 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SL0605996848 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page BRISTOL ONE DAY CLEA 3825 S BRISTOL ST Facility Status: Post-Investigation/Remediation Monitoring BRISTOL SHOPPING CEN 3825 SOUTH BRISTOL S Facility Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Global Id: SL0605953624 State and tribal registered storage tank lists NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.431 mi.) 122 29 NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.431 mi.) 123 32 UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/14/2016 has revealed that there are 8 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page MARRIOTT SUITES 500 ANTON BLVD SSE 0 - 118 (0.112 mi.) B5 14 Facility Id: FA0024426 Facility Id: 11590 METRO CENTER @SOUTH 575 ANTON BLVD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.136 mi.) C7 15 Facility Id: FA0024433 Facility Id: 11599 METRO FIRE STATION # 3350 SAKIOKA DR E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.145 mi.) E10 17 Facility Id: FA0024930 Facility Id: 12521 METRO CENTER @ SOUTH 555 ANTON BLVD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) F12 18 Facility Id: FA0042316 Facility Id: 19717 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SEGERSTROM CENTER FO 600 TOWN CENTER DR WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.138 mi.) D8 16 Facility Id: FA0024078 Facility Id: 18255 SEGERSTROM CENTER FO 615 TOWN CENTER DR WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.150 mi.) D11 17 Facility Id: FA0050008 CENTER TOWER 650 TOWN CENTER DR WNW 118 - 114 (0.185 mi.) G15 19 Facility Id: FA0024021 TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Facility Id: 7959 WESTIN SOUTH COAST P 686 ANTON BLVD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) 17 20 Facility Id: 5421 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990's. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 5 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Eaual/Hiaher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID MARRIOTT SUITES 500 ANTON BLVD Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 11590 METRO CENTER @SOUTH 575 ANTON BLVD Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 11599 METRO FIRE STATION 3350 SAKIOKA Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 12521 SOUTH COAST METRO CE 555 ANTON BLVD 100 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 11597 Lower Elevation Address CENTER TOWER 650 TOWN CENTER DR Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 7959 SSE 0 - 118 (0.112 mi.) B5 SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.136 mi.) C7 E 118 - 1/4 (0.145 mi.) E9 SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) F14 Direction / Distance Map ID WNW 118 - 114 (0.185 mi.) G15 Page 14 15 16 lig Page 19 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 5 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page MARRIOTT SUITES 500 ANTON BLVD SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.112 mi.) B4 13 TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Facility Id: 30017674 Status: A SOUTH COAST METRO CE 575 ANTON BLVD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.136 mi.) C6 14 Facility Id: 30017675 Status: A METRO FIRE STATION 3350 SAK/OKA E 118 - 114 (0.145 mi.) E9 16 Facility Id: 30004656 Status: A PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RE 555 ANTON BLVD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.) F13 18 Facility Id: 30007852 Status: A Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page CENTER CLUB, INC 650 TOWN CENTER DR WNW 118 - 114 (0.185 mi.) G16 20 Facility Id: 30007689 Status: A Other Ascertainable Records DRYCLEANERS: A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaners' agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/08/2016 has revealed that there is 1 DRYCLEANERS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page OCEAN PARK CLEANERS 580 ANTON BLVD 213 S 0 - 1/8 (0.102 mi.) A3 8 EPA Id: CAD983612409 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 5 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page G&M OIL COMPANY 3301 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.331 mi.) H19 24 Reg Id: 083002853T DOWNEY SAVINGS PLAZA 3200 BRISTOL WSW 1/4 - 112 (0.333 mi.) 20 24 Reg Id: 083001048T UNOCAL # 3900 BRISTOL ST NW 1/4 - 112 (0.423 mi.) 21 28 Reg Id: 083002578T CHEVRON #9-1921 3801 BRISTOL ST NW 114 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.) J25 34 TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Reg Id: 083001181T FIRESTONE STORE #278 3733 BRISTOL ST NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.488 mi.) J27 47 Reg Id: 083002375T Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/10/2015 has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SHELL SERVICE STA TIO 3045 BRISTOL SSW 112 - 1 (0.719 mi.) 29 50 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0. 125 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page Not reported 580 ANTON BLVD S 0 - 1/8 (0.102 mi.) A2 TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 6 records. Site Name ASTRO OIL SERVICE STATION SHELL OIL ARCO #0192 SAKIOKA FARMS BRISTOL PLAZA CALIF CLEANERS SUNFLOWER PLAZA METRO CLEANERS Database(s) LUST, HIST CORTESE LUST LUST SLIC SLIC SLIC TC4671365.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 OVERVIEW MAP - 4671365.2S 0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles 0 Indian Reservations BIA U Areas of Concern Target Property Sites at elevations higher than Ll or equal to the target property 0 Sites at elevations lower than F7 the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants El National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites 0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles 0 Indian Reservations BIA U Areas of Concern This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Starwood Tribute Hotel Project CLIENT: Bonterra Psomas ADDRESS: 3350 Avenue of The Arts CONTACT: Megan Larum Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4671365.2s LAT/LONG: 33.691655/117.880157 DATE: July 12, 2016 1:43 pm Copyright (0 2016 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TomTom Rel. 2016. Power transmission lines Pipelines Ll 100 -year flood zone 0 500 -year flood zone F7 National Wetland Inventory 0 State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Starwood Tribute Hotel Project CLIENT: Bonterra Psomas ADDRESS: 3350 Avenue of The Arts CONTACT: Megan Larum Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4671365.2s LAT/LONG: 33.691655/117.880157 DATE: July 12, 2016 1:43 pm Copyright (0 2016 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TomTom Rel. 2016. DETAIL MAP - 4671365.2S SITE NAME: Starwood Tribute Hotel Project CLIENT: Bonterra Psomas ADDRESS: 3350 Avenue of The Arts CONTACT: Megan Larum Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4671365.2s LAT/LONG: 33.691655/117.880157 DATE: July 12, 2016 1:44 pm Copyright (0 2016 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TomTom Rel. 2016. Target Property 0 1/16 1/6 1/4 Mlles A, Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA Areas of Concern Sites at elevations lower than p ° Power transmission lines the target property 0 100 -year flood zone A Manufactured Gas Plants 0 500 -year flood zone r Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites . National Wetland Inventory Dept. Defense Sites 0 State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Starwood Tribute Hotel Project CLIENT: Bonterra Psomas ADDRESS: 3350 Avenue of The Arts CONTACT: Megan Larum Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4671365.2s LAT/LONG: 33.691655/117.880157 DATE: July 12, 2016 1:44 pm Copyright (0 2016 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TomTom Rel. 2016. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal CERCUS list FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS -ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-SQG 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal ERNS list ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR 1.000 0 0 0 7 NR 7 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 0 0 6 NR NR 6 TC4671365.2s Page 4 Database MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SLIC 0.500 0 0 3 NR NR 3 State and tribal registered storage tank lists Contaminated Sites NR 0 US HIST CDL TP HIST Cal -Sites FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 UST 0.250 1 7 NR NR NR 8 AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS TP 0 NR INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal Brownfields sites NR NR NR NR 0 1 BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 SWRCY 0.500 HAULERS TP INDIAN ODI 0.500 DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 ODI 0.500 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites NR 0 US HIST CDL TP HIST Cal -Sites 1.000 SCH 0.250 CDL TP Toxic Pits 1.000 US CDL TP Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST 0.250 HIST UST 0.250 CA FID UST 0.250 Local Land Records NR LIENS TP LIENS 2 TP DEED 0.500 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS TP 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 1 4 NR NR NR 5 0 0 NR NR NR 0 1 4 NR NR NR 5 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 TC4671365.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY TC4671365.2s Page 6 Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted CHMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 LDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MCS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Orange Co. Industrial Site TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SPILLS 90 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US FIN ASSUR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 EPA WATCH LIST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RMP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PRP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MILTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 PCB TRANSFORMER TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LEAD SMELTERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 DOCKET HWC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CA BOND EXP. PLAN 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Cortese 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CUPA Listings 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 DRYCLEANERS 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1 EMI TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ENF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Financial Assurance TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HAZNET TP 1 NR NR NR NR NR 1 HIST CORTESE 0.500 0 0 5 NR NR 5 HWP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TC4671365.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Database H WT 0.250 MINES TP MWMP 0.250 NPDES TP PEST LIC TP PROC 0.500 Notify 65 1.000 UIC TP WASTEWATER PITS 0.500 WDS TP W I P 0.250 ECHO TP FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 EDR Hist Auto 0.125 EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF TP RGA LUST TP - Totals -- 1 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database Total < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 1 NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 NR NR NR NR 0 1 NR NR NR NR 1 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 6 15 14 8 0 44 TC4671365.2s Page 7 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 1 THE WYNDHAM South Target 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS Property COSTA MESA, CA 92626 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 539 ft. HAZNET: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 envid: S112892551 Actual: Year: 2001 31 ft. GEPAID: CAC001448616 OCEAN PARK CLEANERS Contact: JOE COMADURAN 2001 Telephone: 7147515100 580 ANTON BLVD Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS OCEAN PARK CLEANERS Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 2002 Gen County: Not reported 580 ANTON BLVD TSD EPA ID: CAD028409019 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Unspecified organic liquid mixture Disposal Method: Treatment, Tank Tons: 0.02 Cat Decode: Unspecified organic liquid mixture Method Decode: Treatment, Tank Facility County: Orange A2 OCEAN PARK CLEANERS South South 580 ANTON BLVD COSTA MESA, CA 92626 < 1/8 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 539 ft. 0.102 mi. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 539 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A Relative: EDR Historical Cleaners: Higher Name: OCEAN PARK CLEANERS Year: 2001 Actual: Address: 580 ANTON BLVD 32 ft. Name: OCEAN PARK CLEANERS Year: 2002 Address: 580 ANTON BLVD Name: OCEANPARK CLEANERS Year: 2003 Address: 580 ANTON BLVD Name: OCEAN BREEZE CLEANER Year: 2007 Address: 580 ANTON BLVD A3 OCEAN PARK CLEANERS South 580 ANTON BLVD 213 < 1/8 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.102 mi. Facility name: OCEAN PARK CLEANERS 539 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A Relative: Higher RCRA-SQG: Date form received by agency: 12/12/1991 Actual: Facility name: OCEAN PARK CLEANERS 32 ft. Facility address: 580 ANTON BLVD 213 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HAZNET S112892551 N/A EDR Hist Cleaner 1015077082 N/A RCRA-SQG 1000597237 FINDS CAD983612409 DRYCLEANERS HAZNET NPDES ECHO TC4671365.2s Page 8 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number OCEAN PARK CLEANERS (Continued) EPA ID: CAD983612409 Contact: CHRIS CHOI Contact address: 580 ANTON BLVD 213 Not reported COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (714) 436-0411 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous No waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of No hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous No waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of No hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: CHRIS CHOI Owner/operator address: 580 ANTON BLVD 123 Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: (714) 436-0411 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status FINDS: Registry ID: No violations found 110002864295 Environmental Interest/Information System California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of 1000597237 TC4671365.2s Page 9 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number OCEAN PARK CLEANERS (Continued) 1000597237 events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. DRYCLEANERS: EPA Id: CAD983612409 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin -Operated) SIC Code: 7211 SIC Description: Power Laundries, Family and Commercial Create Date: 11/07/1991 Facility Active: No Inactive Date: Not reported Facility Addr2: Not reported Owner Name: CHRIS CHOI Owner Address: 580 ANTON BLVD 123 Owner Address 2: Not reported Owner Telephone: 0000000000 Contact Name: CHRIS CHOI OWNER Contact Address: 580 ANTON BL #213 Contact Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 7144360411 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address 1: 580 ANTON BLVD # 213 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City: COSTA MESA Mailing State: CA Mailing Zip: 926260000 Owner Fax: 9 Region Code: Not reported HAZNET: envid: 1000597237 Year: 2005 GEPAID: CAD983612409 Contact: CHRIS CHOI OWNER Telephone: 7144360411 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 580 ANTON BLVD # 213 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perch loroethylene, etc) Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: Not reported Cat Decode: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perch loroethylene, etc) Method Decode: Not reported Facility County: Orange envid: 1000597237 Year: 2005 GEPAID: CAD983612409 TC4671365.2s Page 10 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number OCEAN PARK CLEANERS (Continued) Contact: CHRIS CHOI OWNER Telephone: 7144360411 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 580 ANTON BLVD # 213 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, NVR000076158 etc) Disposal Method: Invalid Code Tons: 0.22 Cat Decode: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc) Method Decode: Invalid Code Facility County: Orange envid: 1000597237 Year: 2005 GEPAID: CAD983612409 Contact: CHRIS CHOI OWNER Telephone: 7144360411 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 580 ANTON BLVD # 213 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: NVR000076158 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Disposal Method: Not reported Tons: Not reported Cat Decode: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent Method Decode: Not reported Facility County: Orange envid: 1000597237 Year: 1999 GEPAID: CAD983612409 Contact: CHRIS CHOI Telephone: 0000000000 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 580 ANTON BLVD # 213 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD981397417 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc) Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .2751 Cat Decode: Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc) Method Decode: Recycler Facility County: Orange envid: 1000597237 Year: 1998 GEPAID: CAD983612409 Contact: CHRIS CHOI 1000597237 TC4671365.2s Page 11 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number OCEAN PARK CLEANERS (Continued) 1000597237 Telephone: 0000000000 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 580 ANTON BLVD # 213 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926260000 Gen County: Not reported TSD EPA ID: CAD981375983 TSD County: Not reported Waste Category: Solids or sludges with halogenated organic compounds — 1,000 Mg./L Disposal Method: Recycler Tons: .1125 Cat Decode: Solids or sludges with halogenated organic compounds — 1,000 Mg./L Method Decode: Recycler Facility County: Orange Clink this by arlink while viewing on your computer to access 4 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. NPDES: Npdes Number: CAS000002 Facility Status: Active Agency Id: 0 Region: 8 Regulatory Measure Id: 460094 Order No: 2009-0009-DWQ Regulatory Measure Type: Enrollee Place Id: Not reported WDID: 8 30C373960 Program Type: Construction Adoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reported Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: 09/09/2015 Expiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reported Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reported Discharge Name: SCP Apartments LLC Discharge Address: 5141 Calfirnia Ave Discharge City: Irvine Discharge State: California Discharge Zip: 92617 RECEIVED DATE: Not reported PROCESSED DATE: Not reported STATUS CODE NAME: Not reported STATUS DATE: Not reported PLACE SIZE: Not reported PLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reported FACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reported FACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reported FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reported FACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reported FACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reported OPERATOR NAME: Not reported OPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reported OPERATOR CITY: Not reported OPERATOR STATE: Not reported OPERATOR ZIP: Not reported OPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reported OPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reported OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reported OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reported TC4671365.2s Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site OCEAN PARK CLEANERS (Continued) MAP FINDINGS OPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reported OPERATOR TYPE: Not reported DEVELOPER NAME: Not reported DEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reported DEVELOPER CITY: Not reported DEVELOPER STATE: Not reported DEVELOPER ZIP: Not reported DEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reported DEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reported CONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reported EMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reported EMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reported CONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reported CONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reported CONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reported CONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reported CONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reported CONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reported CONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reported CONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reported CONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reported CONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reported CONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reported CONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reported CONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reported CONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reported CONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reported CONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reported DIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reported RECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reported CERTIFIER NAME: Not reported CERTIFIER TITLE: Not reported CERTIFICATION DATE: Not reported PRIMARY SIC: Not reported SECONDARY SIC: Not reported TERTIARY SIC: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number ECHO: Envid: 1000597237 Registry ID: 110002864295 DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002864295 B4 MARRIOTT SUITES SSE 500 ANTON BLVD < 1/8 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.112 mi. 590 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster B Relative: CA FID UST: Higher Facility ID: 30017674 Regulated By: UTNKA Actual: Regulated ID: Not reported 32 ft. Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 7149571100 Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 500 ANTON BLVD 1000597237 CA FID UST 0002096178 N/A TC4671365.2s Page 13 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site MARRIOTT SUITES (Continued) Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA 92626 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNS Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported Comments: Not reported Status: Active B5 MARRIOTT SUITES Status: SSE 500 ANTON BLVD 11590 < 1/8 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Board Of Equalization: 0.112 mi. Referral Date: 09-30-92 590 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster B Created Date: Relative: UST: Not reported Higher Facility ID: 11590 A Permitting Agency: ORANGE COUNTY Actual: Latitude: 33.6920523 32 ft. Longitude: -117.8770155 ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0024426 SWEEPS UST: SOUTH COAST METRO CENTER Status: Active Comp Number: 11590 Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: Not reported Referral Date: 09-30-92 Action Date: 09-15-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: Not reported SWRCB Tank Id: 30-000-011590-000001 Tank Status: A Capacity: 2385 Active Date: Not reported Tank Use: M.V. FUEL STG: P Content: DIESEL Number Of Tanks: 1 C6 SOUTH COAST METRO CENTER SE 575 ANTON BLVD 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.136 mi. 718 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster C Relative: CA FID UST: Higher Facility ID: 30017675 Regulated By: UTNKA Actual: Regulated ID: Not reported 32 ft. Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0002096178 UST 0003433175 SWEEPS UST N/A CA FID UST S101631304 N/A TC4671365.2s Page 14 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site C7 SE 1/8-1/4 0.136 mi. 718 ft. SOUTH COAST METRO CENTER (Continued) Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNS Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: 7147510200 Not reported 535 ANTON Not reported COSTA MESA 92626 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active METRO CENTER @SOUTH COAST 575 ANTON BLVD COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 2 of 2 in cluster C Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: Permitting Agency: Actual: Latitude: 32 ft. Longitude: ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0024433 SWEEPS UST: Status: Comp Number: Number: Board Of Equalization Referral Date: Action Date: Created Date: Owner Tank Id: SWRCB Tank Id: Tank Status: Capacity: Active Date: Tank Use: STG: Content: Number Of Tanks: 11599 ORANGE COUNTY 33.6903421 -117.8772541 Active 11599 9 Not reported 09-30-92 09-15-92 02-29-88 Not reported 30-000-011599-000001 A 1000 Not reported M.V. FUEL P DIESEL 1 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101631304 UST 0003879953 SWEEPS UST N/A TC4671365.2s Page 15 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site D8 WNW 1/8-1/4 0.138 mi. 729 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 28 ft. E9 East 1/8-1/4 0.145 mi. 766 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 31 ft. SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS 600 TOWN CENTER DR COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 1 of 2 in cluster D UST: Facility ID: Permitting Agency: Latitude: Longitude: ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0024078 METRO FIRE STATION 3350 SAKIOKA COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 1 of 2 in cluster E MAP FINDINGS 18255 ORANGE COUNTY 33.6936592 -117.8796839 SWEEPS UST: Status: Active Comp Number: 12521 Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: Not reported Referral Date: 09-30-92 Action Date: 06-18-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: Not reported SWRCB Tank Id: 30-000-012521-000001 Tank Status: A Capacity: 1000 Active Date: Not reported Tank Use: M.V. FUEL STG: P Content: DIESEL Number Of Tanks: 1 CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNS Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: 30004656 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 77 FAIR DRIVE P O BOX Not reported COSTA MESA 92626 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number UST 0003433293 NIA SWEEPS UST S101631299 CA FID UST NIA HAZNET TC4671365.2s Page 16 Map ID METRO FIRE STATION #6 UST 0003433184 MAP FINDINGS 3350 SAKIOKA DR Direction 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.145 mi. Distance 766 ft. EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Higher Facility ID: METRO FIRE STATION (Continued) S101631299 Permitting Agency: HAZNET: Actual: Latitude: envid: S101631299 Longitude: Year: 2013 GEPAID: CAC002721031 Contact: GANT CORUM Telephone: 7143277481 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: PO BOX 1200 Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926281200 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.0882 Cat Decode: Not reported Method Decode: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Facility County: Not reported E10 METRO FIRE STATION #6 UST 0003433184 East 3350 SAKIOKA DR N/A 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.145 mi. 766 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster E Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: 12521 Permitting Agency: ORANGE COUNTY Actual: Latitude: 33.6933132 31 ft. Longitude: -117.8757092 ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0024930 D11 SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS UST 0004117505 WNW 615 TOWN CENTER DR N/A 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.150 mi. 792 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster D Relative: ORANGE CO. UST: Lower Facility ID: FA0050008 Actual: 28 ft. TC4671365.2s Page 17 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site F12 SE 1/8-1/4 0.177 mi. 934 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 32 ft. F13 SE 1/8-1/4 0.177 mi. 934 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 32 ft. METRO CENTER @ SOUTH COAST 555 ANTON BLVD COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 1 of 3 in cluster F UST: Facility ID: Permitting Agency: Latitude: Longitude: ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0042316 PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REALTY 555 ANTON BLVD COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 2 of 3 in cluster F CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNs Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: MAP FINDINGS 19717 ORANGE COUNTY 33.689823 -117.8766303 30007852 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 555 ANTON Not reported COSTA MESA 92626 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active EMI: Year: 1990 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 75900 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 6531 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:O EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number UST 0003995239 NIA CA FID UST S101589354 EMI NIA TC4671365.2s Page 18 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Active Comp Number: Direction Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: 44-016663 Distance 09-30-92 Action Date: 09-15-92 EDR ID Number Elevation Site Not reported Database(s) EPA ID Number F14 SOUTH COAST METRO CENTER Capacity: SWEEPS UST S106932384 SE 555 ANTON BLVD 100 M.V. FUEL STG: N/A 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Number Of Tanks: 1 0.177 mi. 934 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster F Relative: SWEEPS UST: Higher Status: Active Comp Number: 11597 Actual: Number: 9 32 ft. Board Of Equalization: Not reported Referral Date: 09-30-92 Action Date: 09-15-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: Not reported SWRCB Tank Id: 30-000-011597-000001 Tank Status: A Capacity: 1000 Active Date: Not reported Tank Use: M.V. FUEL STG: P Content: DIESEL Number Of Tanks: 1 G15 CENTER TOWER UST 0003432844 WNW 650 TOWN CENTER DR SWEEPS UST N/A 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.185 mi. 976 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster G Relative: UST: Lower Facility ID: 7959 Permitting Agency: ORANGE COUNTY Actual: Latitude: 33.694097 27 ft. Longitude: -117.881294 ORANGE CO. UST: Facility ID: FA0024021 SWEEPS UST: Status: Active Comp Number: 7959 Number: 9 Board Of Equalization: 44-016663 Referral Date: 09-30-92 Action Date: 09-15-92 Created Date: 02-29-88 Owner Tank Id: Not reported SWRCB Tank Id: 30-000-007959-000001 Tank Status: A Capacity: 1000 Active Date: Not reported Tank Use: M.V. FUEL STG: P Content: DIESEL Number Of Tanks: 1 TC4671365.2s Page 19 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site G16 WNW 1/8-1/4 0.185 mi. 976 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 27 ft. CENTER CLUB, INC 650 TOWN CENTER DR COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 2 of 2 in cluster G CA FID UST: Facility ID: Regulated By: Regulated ID: Cortese Code: SIC Code: Facility Phone: Mail To: Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Contact: Contact Phone: DUNS Number: NPDES Number: EPA ID: Comments: Status: 30007689 UTNKA Not reported Not reported Not reported 7142411700 Not reported 611 ANTON Not reported COSTA MESA 92626 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Active MAP FINDINGS EMI: WESTIN SOUTH COAST PLAZA Year: 1990 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 68672 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 5812 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:O EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CA FID UST S101609510 EMI N/A 17 WESTIN SOUTH COAST PLAZA UST 0003880091 WSW 686 ANTON BLVD N/A 1/8-1/4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.248 mi. 1312 ft. Relative: UST: Lower Facility ID: 5421 Permitting Agency: ORANGE COUNTY Actual: Latitude: 33.6919613 27 ft. Longitude: -117.8822938 TC4671365.2s Page 20 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site H18 SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO WSW 3333 BRISTOL ST 1/4-1/2 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.331 mi. DENAMARIE BAKER 1746 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster H Relative: LUST: Lower Region: Email: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 28 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: MAP FINDINGS STATE T0605900596 33.6927591 -117.8856741 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 08/20/2004 ORANGE COUNTY LOP DB ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083000754T 88UT015 Local Agency Warehouse Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating, Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility Contact: T0605900596 Global Id: T0605900596 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605900596 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: ROSE SCOTT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: rscott@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9513206375 Status History: Global Id: T0605900596 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 08/20/2004 Global Id: T0605900596 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 01/05/1988 Global Id: T0605900596 Status: Open - Remediation Status Date: 08/09/1993 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST 1000369396 N/A TC4671365.2s Page 21 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO (Continued) 1000369396 Regulatory Activities: Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: Other Date: 01/05/1988 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/20/2004 Action: Closure/No Further Action Letter Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/19/1988 Action: Notice of Responsibility Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/03/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/12/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: Other Date: 01/05/1988 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/14/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/29/2003 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 03/06/2000 Action: Other (Use Description Field) Global Id: T0605900596 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 08/20/1993 Action: Excavation ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 88UT015 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) TC4671365.2s Page 22 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO (Continued) 1000369396 Released Substance: Waste oil/Used oil Date Closed: 12/20/2004 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0001118 Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 88UT015 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 12/20/2004 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0001118 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083000754T Local Case Num: 88UT015 Case Type: Other ground water affected Substance: 12035,800661 Qty Leaked: 0 Abate Method: Not reported Cross Street: Not reported Enf Type: CLOS Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Leak Cause: Unknown Leak Source: Unknown Global ID: T0605900596 How Stopped Date: 9/9/9999 Enter Date: Not reported Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reported Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 1/5/1988 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 12/20/2004 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reported Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: 9/9/1993 Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported GW Qualifies: _ Soil Qualifies: ND Operator: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Interim: Not reported Oversite Program: LUST Latitude: 33.6927591 Longitude: -117.8856741 MTBE Date: 6/6/2002 Max MTBE GW: 12 MTBE Concentration: 0 Max MTBE Soil: 0 TC4671365.2s Page 23 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO (Continued) MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: Not reported H19 G&M OIL COMPANY WSW WSW 3301 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92704 1760 ft. 0.331 mi. Relative: LUST: 1748 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster H Relative: HIST CORTESE: Latitude: Lower Region: CORTESE Case Type: Facility County Code: 30 Actual: Reg By: LTNKA 28 ft. Reg Id: 083002853T 20 DOWNEY SAVINGS PLAZA WSW 3200 BRISTOL 1/4-1/2 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.333 mi. 1760 ft. Relative: LUST: Lower Region: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 28 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0 MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected RS AR Local Agency 30000L Not reported MUN Not reported Not reported Not reported 1000369396 HIST CORTESE S104233749 N/A LUST S104570414 HIST UST N/A EMI HIST CORTESE STATE T0605900829 33.6887913 -117.8854051 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 08/29/1995 ORANGE COUNTY LOP DB ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083001048T 89UT173 Local Agency Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Contact: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: T0605900829 Local Agency Caseworker DENAMARIE BAKER ORANGE COUNTY LOP TC4671365.2s Page 24 Map ID Global Id: MAP FINDINGS Action Type: Direction Date: 09/01/1989 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900829 Distance Other EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Global Id: T0605900829 Action Type: DOWNEY SAVINGS PLAZA (Continued) S104570414 02/27/1990 Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605900829 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULL Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: vjahn-bull@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824903 Status History: Global Id: T0605900829 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 08/29/1995 Global Id: T0605900829 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 09/01/1989 Regulatory Activities: Global Id: T0605900829 Action Type: Other Date: 09/01/1989 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900829 Action Type: Other Date: 09/01/1989 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605900829 Action Type: REMEDIATION Date: 02/27/1990 Action: Excavation ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 89UT173 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 08/29/1995 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0000895 LUST REG 8: Region: 8 County: Orange Regional Board: Santa Ana Region Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083001048T TC4671365.2s Page 25 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site DOWNEY SAVINGS PLAZA (Continued) MAP FINDINGS Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Date Pollution Characterization Began: Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Date Remedial Action Underway: Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S104570414 89UT173 Other ground water affected Gasoline 0 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Tank Closure Close Tank Unknown Unknown T0605900829 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 9/1/1989 Not reported 8/29/1995 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6887913 -117.8854051 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 1 Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. vii AR Local Agency 30000L Not reported MUN Not reported Not reported Not reported HIST UST: File Number: 0002E86D URL: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E86D.pdf Region: Not reported Facility ID: Not reported TC4671365.2s Page 26 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number DOWNEY SAVINGS PLAZA (Continued) S104570414 Facility Type: Not reported Other Type: Not reported Contact Name: Not reported Telephone: Not reported Owner Name: Not reported Owner Address: Not reported Owner City,St,Zip: Not reported Total Tanks: Not reported Tank Num: Not reported Container Num: Not reported Year Installed: Not reported Tank Capacity: Not reported Tank Used for: Not reported Type of Fuel: Not reported Container Construction Thickness: Not reported Leak Detection: Not reported Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: EMI: 1995 Year: 1990 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 76191 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 6541 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:O Year: 1995 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 76191 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 6541 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:O HIST CORTESE: TC4671365.2s Page 27 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site DOWNEY SAVINGS PLAZA (Continued) Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083001048T 21 UNOCAL # NW 3900 BRISTOL ST 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92705 0.423 mi. 2234 ft. Relative: LUST REG 8: Lower Region: County: Actual: Regional Board: 28 ft. Facility Status: Case Number: Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Date Pollution Characterization Began: Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Date Remedial Action Underway: Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S104570414 LUST S104758752 HIST CORTESE N/A 8 Orange Santa Ana Region Preliminary site assessment underway 083002578T Not reported Soil only Gasoline Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported T0605901808 Not reported 12/19/1994 Not reported 1/1/1965 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 12/19/1994 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6949161 -117.8856451 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 1 Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. TC4671365.2s Page 28 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site 122 NW 1/4-1/2 0.431 mi. 2277 ft. Relative: Lower Actual 28 ft. UNOCAL # (Continued) Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: Not reported HIST CORTESE: Region: Facility County Code Reg By: Reg Id: BRISTOL ONE DAY CLEANERS 3825 S BRISTOL ST SANTA ANA, CA 92704 Site 1 of 2 in cluster I CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083002578T MAP FINDINGS NOM JB Local Agency Santa Ana, Orange County COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S104758752 RCRA-SQG 1000389231 SLIC CAD981620693 FINDS DRYCLEANERS EMI ECHO RCRA-SQG: AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE Date form received by agency: 04/20/2004 Facility name: BRISTOL ONE DAY CLEANERS Facility address: 3825 S BRISTOL ST US SANTA ANA, CA 92704 EPA ID: CAD981620693 Mailing address: ORANGE BRISTOL LT CO R ELLIS Operator 2401 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD STE 470 01/01/2004 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 Contact: JON WALDRON Contact address: ORANGE BRISTOL LT CO R ELLIS 2401 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD STE 470 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 310-592-3613 Contact email: JON.WALDRON@CBRE.COM EPA Region: 09 Land type: Private Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE Owner/operator address: Not reported Not reported Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: 01/01/2004 TC4671365.2s Page 29 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site BRISTOL ONE DAY CLEANERS (Continued) Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Not reported CHONG UK HWANG NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415) 555-1212 Private Owner Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Owner/operator name: ORANGE BRISTOL LP Owner/operator address: CO INESTCORP PROP LTD 280 PARK AVE 36TH FLOOR Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NEW YORK, NY 10017 Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: 08/04/2003 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 Not reported (415) 555-1212 Private Operator Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D039 Waste name: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 09/01/1996 Site name: BRISTOL ONE DAY CLEANERS Classification: Small Quantity Generator 1000389231 TC4671365.2s Page 30 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site BRISTOL ONE DAY CLEANERS (Continued) Violation Status Evaluation Action Summary: Evaluation date: Evaluation: Area of violation: Date achieved compliance: Evaluation lead agency: No violations found 10/17/1994 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Not reported Not reported State Contractor/Grantee SLIC REG 8: RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Type: Soil and Groundwater Facility Status: Post-Investigation/Remediation Monitoring Staff: WDM Substance: PCE Lead Agency: Regional Board Location Code: Not reported Thomas Bros Code: Not reported FINDS: Registry ID: 110002726756 Environmental Interest/Information System EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000389231 TC4671365.2s Page 31 RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. DRYCLEANERS: EPA Id: CAR000167155 NAICS Code: 81232 NAICS Description: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin -Operated) SIC Code: 7211 SIC Description: Power Laundries, Family and Commercial Create Date: 01/05/2005 Facility Active: Yes Inactive Date: Not reported Facility Addr2: Not reported Owner Name: BRISTOL CENTER HOLDINGS LP Owner Address: 8115 PRESTON RD STE 400 Owner Address 2: Not reported Owner Telephone: 2146924200 Contact Name: CHRISTE CAVANESS Contact Address: 8115 PRESTON RD STE 400 Contact Address 2: Not reported Contact Telephone: 2146924200 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address 1: 8115 PRESTON RD STE 400 Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City: DALLAS Mailing State: TX Mailing Zip: 752256311 Owner Fax: 4 1000389231 TC4671365.2s Page 31 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number BRISTOL ONE DAY CLEANERS (Continued) Region Code: 2146924201 EMI: 1990 Year: 1987 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 36791 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 7216 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:O Year: 1990 County Code: 30 Air Basin: SC Facility ID: 36791 Air District Name: SC SIC Code: 7216 Air District Name: SOUTH COAST AQMD Community Health Air Pollution Info System: Not reported Consolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reported Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0 Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0 NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0 SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0 Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0 Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr:O ECHO: Envid: 1000389231 Registry ID: 110002726756 DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002726756 123 BRISTOL SHOPPING CENTER - FORMER 1 -DAY CLEANERS NW 3825 SOUTH BRISTOL STREET 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 0.431 mi. 2277 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster I Relative: SLIC Lower Region: Facility Status: Actual: Status Date: 28 ft. Global Id: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Case Number: Latitude: Longitude: STATE Open -Verification Monitoring 01/01/2014 SL0605953624 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Not reported 33.6971012171541 -117.884287834167 1000389231 SLIC S106487161 N/A TC4671365.2s Page 32 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site BRISTOL SHOPPING CENTER - FORMER 1 -DAY CLEANERS (Continued) Case Type: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S106487161 Cleanup Program Site ANA Not reported Not reported Not reported Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) The site is a former dry cleaner with significant soil contamination with PCE and very low contamination of groundwater. Excavation of the soil in the indoor areas had been conducted to the extent possible. However, upon further investigation of the adjacent tenant units and the outdoor areas it was determined that soil is also contaminated in these areas. Soil excavation has been requested in these areas. Additional sampling for optimizing the area to be excavated was conducted and the final boundaries of the excavation area was determined. A revised work plan for soil remediation was approved in December 2011. Plan for soil excavation was approved by the City of Santa Ana after a sanitary sewer line located within the excavationa area was relocated. Excavation via large diameter auger (LDA) began in August 2013 and completed in September 2013. Verification monitroing of the perched groundwater is ongoing at the Site. Investigation into the deeper WBZ has been requested. Semi-annual groundwater sampling is ongoing. Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: 24 SAKIOKA FARMS ENE SWC OF SUNFLOWER AND ANTON BLVD. 1/4-1/2 COSTA MESA, CA 0.478 mi. 2525 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 36 ft. SLIC: Region: Facility Status: Status Date: Global Id: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Case Number: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: STATE Completed - Case Closed 08/19/2005 SL0605996848 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Not reported 33.6939 -117.8723 Cleanup Program Site RA Not reported Not reported Not reported Soil Not reported Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: SLIC S106487174 N/A TC4671365.2s Page 33 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS J25 CHEVRON #9-1921 NW 3801 BRISTOL ST 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92704 0.481 mi. 2542 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster J Relative: LUST REG 8: Lower Region: County: Actual: Regional Board: 28 ft. Facility Status: Case Number: Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Date Pollution Characterization Began: Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Date Remedial Action Underway: Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST S103891634 CHMIRS NIA HIST CORTESE 8 Orange Santa Ana Region Remediation Plan 083001181T Not reported Aquifer affected Gasoline Not reported EDFP SUNFLOWER MRPO Not reported Tank Closure Not reported Overfill Other Source T0605900929 12/13/1988 3/27/1989 12/13/1988 12/1/1988 12/13/1988 1/1/1965 Not reported Not reported 3/27/1989 4/9/1997 Not reported Not reported 3/27/1989 Not reported Not reported Not reported Yes LUST 33.696774 -117.8853401 12/1/1998 200000 1 Not reported 1 MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected B TME JB Regional Board Santa Ana, Orange County COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Not reported TC4671365.2s Page 34 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) S103891634 Priority: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Work Suspended: Not reported Summary: 02/01/92 RAP SUBMITTED, APPROVED. NO ACTION TAKEN BY RP. RECOVERY WELL INSTALLED 1/19/94. A NEW CAP(RAP) SUBMITTED 4/9/97. Submitted 3rd Quarter 2000 Progress Report. CHMIRS: OES Incident Number: 4-5403 OES notification: 09/23/2014 OES Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Property Use: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported Property Management: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reported Responding Agency Personal # Of Fatalities: Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Number Of Fatalities: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Vehicle License Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported CA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reported Company Name: Not reported Reporting Officer Name/ID: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Waterway Involved: No Waterway: Not reported Spill Site: Merchant/Business Cleanup By: No Containment: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Type: Not reported Measure: Not reported Other: Not reported Type: PETROLEUM Measure: Qt. (s) Other: Not reported Date/Time: 1315 Year: 2014 Agency: Chevron Incident Date: 9/23/2014 Admin Agency: Not reported Amount: Not reported Contained: Yes Site Type: Not reported TC4671365.2s Page 35 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) E Date: Substance: Quantity Released: Unknown: Substance #2: Substance #3: Evacuations: Number of Injuries: Number of Fatalities: #1 Pipeline: #2 Pipeline: #3 Pipeline: #1 Vessel — 300 Tons: #2 Vessel — 300 Tons: #3 Vessel — 300 Tons: Evacs: Injuries: Fatals: Comments: Description: OES Incident Number: OES notification: OES Date: OES Time: Date Completed: Property Use: Agency Id Number: Agency Incident Number: Time Notified: Time Completed: Surrounding Area: Estimated Temperature: Property Management: More Than Two Substances Involved?: Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Others Number Of Decontaminated: Others Number Of Injuries: Others Number Of Fatalities: Vehicle Make/year: Vehicle License Number: Vehicle State: Vehicle Id Number: CA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Company Name: Reporting Officer Name/ID: Report Date: Facility Telephone: Waterway Involved: Waterway: Spill Site: Cleanup By: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Not reported Gasoline 1 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported No No No No No No No Mechanical No Not reported Caller states the automatic shutoff on a fueling nozzle malfunctioned resulting in the release of 1 qt of gasoline onto concrete. Station personnel handled the clean up. No waterways impacted. 13-3678 06/17/2013 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported No Not reported Service Station Responsible Party S103891634 TC4671365.2s Page 36 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) S103891634 Containment: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Type: Not reported Measure: Gal(s) Other: Not reported Date/Time: 1315 Year: 2013 Agency: NRC Incident Date: 6/17/2013 Admin Agency: Santa Ana Fire Department Amount: Not reported Contained: Yes Site Type: Not reported E Date: Not reported Substance: Gasoline Quantity Released: 1.6 Unknown: Not reported Substance #2: Not reported Substance #3: Not reported Evacuations: Not reported Number of Injuries: Not reported Number of Fatalities: Not reported #1 Pipeline: Not reported #2 Pipeline: Not reported #3 Pipeline: Not reported #1 Vessel — 300 Tons: Not reported #2 Vessel — 300 Tons: Not reported #3 Vessel — 300 Tons: Not reported Evacs: Not reported Injuries: Not reported Fatals: Not reported Comments: Not reported Description: Quoting the NRC Report: "CALLER STATED THAT TWO GAS PUMP'S AUTOMATIC SHUT-OFF DID NOT ACTIVATE ALLOWING APPROXIMATELY 1.6 GALLONS OF GASOLINE TO BE RELEASED ONTO THE GROUND." "CLEAN UP WAS COMPLETED." OES Incident Number: 12-6908 OES notification: 11/15/2012 OES Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Property Use: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported Property Management: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported TC4671365.2s Page 37 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) Others Number Of Fatalities: Vehicle Make/year: Vehicle License Number: Vehicle State: Vehicle Id Number: CA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Company Name: Reporting Officer Name/ID: Report Date: Facility Telephone: Waterway Involved: Waterway: Spill Site: Cleanup By: Containment: What Happened: Type: Measure: Other: Date/Time: Year: Agency: Incident Date: Admin Agency: Amount: Contained: Site Type: E Date: Substance: Quantity Released: Unknown: Substance #2: Substance #3: Evacuations: Number of Injuries: Number of Fatalities: #1 Pipeline: #2 Pipeline: #3 Pipeline: #1 Vessel — 300 Tons: #2 Vessel — 300 Tons: #3 Vessel — 300 Tons: Evacs: Injuries: Fatals: Comments: Description: HIST CORTESE: Region: Facility County Code Reg By: Reg Id: CORTESE 30 LTNKA 083001181T MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S103891634 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported No Asphalt Service Station Unknown Not reported Not reported Not reported Oz. Not reported 730 2012 NRC 11/15/2012 Santa Ana Fire Department Not reported Unknown Asphalt Not reported Unleaded Gas 32 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Quoting the NRC Report: "CUSTOMER WAS FUELING A VEHICLE, DROPPED THE NOZZLE AND RELEASED 32 OUNCES TO CONCRETE." "ABSORBENTS APPLIED." TC4671365.2s Page 38 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site J26 NW 1/4-1/2 0.481 mi. 2542 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 28 ft. CHEVRON #9-1921 3801 S BRISTOL ST SANTA ANA, CA 92704 Site 2 of 3 in cluster J LUST: Region: Global Id: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: MAP FINDINGS STATE T0605900929 33.696774 -117.8853401 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 01/15/2016 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) TME SANTA ANA, CITY OF 083001181T Not reported Regional Board Aquifer used for drinking water supply Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Contact: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: Global Id: Contact Type: Contact Name: Organization Name: Address: City: Email: Phone Number: Status History: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: T0605900929 Regional Board Caseworker TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEM SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 RIVERSIDE tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.gov 9513202007 T0605900929 Local Agency Caseworker CHRISTOPHER CIRAULO SANTA ANA, CITY OF 1439 S. BROADWAY SANTA ANA cciraulo@santa-ana.org Not reported T0605900929 Completed - Case Closed 01/15/2016 T0605900929 Open - Case Begin Date 12/01/1988 T0605900929 Open - Remediation 04/09/1997 T0605900929 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST S101589015 CA FID UST N/A CHMIRS TC4671365.2s Page 39 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Global Id: Status: Status Date: Regulatory Activities Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: MAP FINDINGS Open - Remediation 06/05/2006 T0605900929 Open - Site Assessment 12/01/1988 T0605900929 Open - Site Assessment 12/13/1988 T0605900929 Open - Site Assessment 03/27/1989 T0605900929 Open - Site Assessment 10/17/2006 T0605900929 Open - Site Assessment 05/01/2007 T0605900929 Open - Site Assessment 05/03/2007 T0605900929 Open - Verification Monitoring 05/23/2008 T0605900929 ENFORCEMENT 08/02/2005 Preparation of Record for Appeal/Referral/Petition T0605900929 ENFORCEMENT 09/12/2008 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other T0605900929 ENFORCEMENT 08/10/2009 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other T0605900929 RESPONSE 08/21/2006 Soil and Water Investigation Workplan T0605900929 ENFORCEMENT 02/24/2012 Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101589015 TC4671365.2s Page 40 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) S101589015 Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/18/2012 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/21/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: Other Date: 12/13/1988 Action: Leak Discovery Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/08/2008 Action: File review Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 09/20/2014 Action: Request for Closure - Regulator Responded Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/28/2014 Action: Request for Closure - Regulator Responded Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/30/2007 Action: Interim Remedial Action Plan Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/15/2013 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/15/2003 Action: . No Action Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/05/2006 Action: File review Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: Other Date: 12/13/1988 Action: Leak Reported Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT TC4671365.2s Page 41 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) S101589015 Date: 09/12/2008 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11/20/2008 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/23/2010 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/15/2012 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 12/03/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 11/08/2006 Action: Interim Remedial Action Plan Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 01/10/2012 Action: Clean Up Fund - 5 -Year Review Summary Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 09/13/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/20/2009 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/30/2003 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/19/2011 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/11/2011 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other TC4671365.2s Page 42 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) S101589015 Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/19/2011 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/15/2011 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/19/2006 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/27/2007 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/10/2003 Action: * No Action Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 04/28/2007 Action: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study Report Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: Other Date: 12/13/1988 Action: Leak Stopped Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/30/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 01/30/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/30/2007 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE TC4671365.2s Page 43 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) S101589015 Date: 04/30/2007 Action: Soil and Water Investigation Report Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/12/2012 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 11/04/2013 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/23/2004 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/27/2007 Action: Staff Letter Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 08/12/2007 Action: Other Workplan Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/14/2011 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 10/22/2003 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/13/2016 Action: State Water Board Closure Order Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 10/30/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/28/2015 Action: Notification - Public Notice of Case Closure Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/06/2015 Action: Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Review Summary Report (RSR) TC4671365.2s Page 44 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) S101589015 Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/23/2006 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 01/23/2006 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 06/20/2005 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 02/20/2005 Action: 13267 Monitoring Program Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 07/15/2009 Action: Letter - Notice Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 08/12/2010 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: RESPONSE Date: 07/30/2008 Action: Monitoring Report - Quarterly Global Id: T0605900929 Action Type: ENFORCEMENT Date: 04/11/2011 Action: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other CA FID UST: Facility ID: 30000912 Regulated By: UTNKA Regulated ID: 00062166 Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Facility Phone: 7145576311 Mail To: Not reported Mailing Address: 3801 S BRISTOL Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: SANTA ANA 92704 Contact: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DUNs Number: Not reported NPDES Number: Not reported EPA ID: Not reported TC4671365.2s Page 45 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) S101589015 Comments: Not reported Status: Active CHMIRS: OES Incident Number: 13-2122 OES notification: 04/08/2013 OES Date: Not reported OES Time: Not reported Date Completed: Not reported Property Use: Not reported Agency Id Number: Not reported Agency Incident Number: Not reported Time Notified: Not reported Time Completed: Not reported Surrounding Area: Not reported Estimated Temperature: Not reported Property Management: Not reported More Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reported Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reported Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reported Others Number Of Decontaminated: Not reported Others Number Of Injuries: Not reported Others Number Of Fatalities: Not reported Vehicle Make/year: Not reported Vehicle License Number: Not reported Vehicle State: Not reported Vehicle Id Number: Not reported CA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reported Company Name: Not reported Reporting Officer Name/ID: Not reported Report Date: Not reported Facility Telephone: Not reported Waterway Involved: No Waterway: Not reported Spill Site: Service Station Cleanup By: Station Personnel Containment: Not reported What Happened: Not reported Type: Not reported Measure: Oz. Other: Not reported Date/Time: 1715 Year: 2013 Agency: NRC Incident Date: 4/8/2013 Admin Agency: Santa Ana Fire Department Amount: Not reported Contained: Yes Site Type: Not reported E Date: Not reported Substance: Gasoline Quantity Released: 32 Unknown: Not reported Substance #2: Not reported Substance #3: Not reported Evacuations: Not reported TC4671365.2s Page 46 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CHEVRON #9-1921 (Continued) S101589015 Number of Injuries: Not reported Number of Fatalities: Not reported #1 Pipeline: Not reported #2 Pipeline: Not reported #3 Pipeline: Not reported #1 Vessel — 300 Tons: Not reported #2 Vessel — 300 Tons: Not reported #3 Vessel — 300 Tons: Not reported Evacs: Not reported Injuries: Not reported Fatals: Not reported Comments: Not reported Description: Per the NRC report: THE CALLER REPORTED A Facility Status: CUSTOMER OVERFILLED THEIR VEHICLE, SPILLING 32 OUNCES OF GASOLINE. SPILL CONTAINED AND CLEANED, 083002375T CAL EMA WILL BE NOTIFIED. J27 FIRESTONE STORE #2783 LUST S101299958 NW 3733 BRISTOL ST HIST CORTESE N/A 1/4-1/2 SANTA ANA, CA 92707 0.488 mi. 2575 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster J Relative: LUST REG 8: Lower Region: 8 County: Orange Actual: Regional Board: Santa Ana Region 28 ft. Facility Status: Case Closed Case Number: 083002375T Local Case Num: Not reported Case Type: Soil only Substance: Diesel Qty Leaked: Not reported Abate Method: EDET Cross Street: CALLENS COMMONS Enf Type: None Taken Funding: Not reported How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Not reported Leak Cause: LINK Leak Source: LINK Global ID: T0605901709 How Stopped Date: 3/4/1993 Enter Date: 1/14/1994 Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 3/4/1993 Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reported Discover Date: 3/4/1993 Enforcement Date: Not reported Close Date: 10/8/1998 Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reported Date Pollution Characterization Began: 5/20/1994 Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reported Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reported Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reported Enter Date: 1/14/1994 GW Qualifies: Not reported Soil Qualifies: Not reported Operator: Not reported TC4671365.2s Page 47 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site FIRESTONE STORE #2783 (Continued) Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: 12/ Not reported Yes LUST 33.697864 -117.8853631 Not reported Not reported 0 Not reported 0 Not Required to be Tested. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S101299958 CAB JB Regional Board Santa Ana, Orange County COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 20/93 SENT LETTER REQUESTING A WORK PLAN FOR INSTALLATION OF THREE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS. PLAN DUE 2/4/94 5/20/94 WELLS SAMPLED ND - ONLY SAMPLED ONE 4/19/95 REQUEST SITE CLOSURE HIST CORTESE: Region: CORTESE Facility County Code: 30 Reg By: LTNKA Reg Id: 083002375T 28 VALENTEC INTERNATIONAL CORP. SE 3190 PULLMAN STREET 1/2-1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 0.710 mi. 3748 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 37 ft. ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: 71002538 Inactive - Needs Evaluation Not reported Not reported Tiered Permit Tiered Permit Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported Not reported Cleanup Cypress 74 37 Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED Not reported ENVIROSTOR S103652395 SLIC N/A Orange Co. Industrial Site TC4671365.2s Page 48 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site VALENTEC INTERNATIONAL CORP. (Continued) Latitude: 33.68594 Longitude: -117.8712 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: CAD067658864 Alias Type: EPA Identification Number Alias Name: 71002538 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported SLIC: Region: Facility Status: Status Date: Global Id: Lead Agency: Lead Agency Case Number: Latitude: Longitude: Case Type: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affected: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: STATE Completed - Case Closed 07/23/2002 SL208263881 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Not reported 33.685804 -117.870568 Cleanup Program Site Not reported Not reported SL208263881 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Orange Co. Industrial Site Case ID: 961C016 Record ID: RO0000536 Current Status: CLOSED 5/1/1996 Closure Type: Closure certification issued Released Chemical: PERCHLOROETHYLENE TRICHLOROETHYLENE EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S103652395 TC4671365.2s Page 49 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site 29 SHELL SERVICE STATION SSW 3045 BRISTOL 1/2-1 COSTA MESA, CA 90220 0.719 mi. DENAMARIE BAKER 3795 ft. ORANGE COUNTY LOP Relative: LUST: Higher Region: Email: Global Id: Actual: Latitude: 38 ft. Longitude: Case Type: Status: Status Date: Lead Agency: Case Worker: Local Agency: RB Case Number: LOC Case Number: File Location: Potential Media Affect: Potential Contaminants of Concern Site History: MAP FINDINGS STATE T0605901151 33.6820635 -117.8857771 LUST Cleanup Site Completed - Case Closed 05/20/2004 ORANGE COUNTY LOP DB ORANGE COUNTY LOP 083001510T 90UT120 Local Agency Warehouse Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water) Gasoline Not reported Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility Contact: T0605901151 Global Id: T0605901151 Contact Type: Local Agency Caseworker Contact Name: DENAMARIE BAKER Organization Name: ORANGE COUNTY LOP Address: 1241 E. DYER ROAD, STE. 120 City: SANTA ANA Email: dbaker@ochca.com Phone Number: 7144336255 Global Id: T0605901151 Contact Type: Regional Board Caseworker Contact Name: CARL BERNHARDT Organization Name: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8) Address: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 City: RIVERSIDE Email: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.gov Phone Number: 9517824495 Status History: Global Id: T0605901151 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status Date: 05/20/2004 Global Id: T0605901151 Status: Open - Case Begin Date Status Date: 04/25/1990 Global Id: T0605901151 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Status Date: 08/01/2002 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST S100230416 Notify 65 N/A TC4671365.2s Page 50 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued) Regulatory Activities: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type Date: Action: Global Id: Action Type: Date: Action: MAP FINDINGS T0605901151 ENFORCEMENT 04/16/2003 Staff Letter T0605901151 ENFORCEMENT 08/18/2003 Staff Letter T0605901151 Other 04/25/1990 Leak Discovery T0605901151 Other 05/03/1990 Leak Reported T0605901151 REMEDIATION 07/09/1991 Excavation T0605901151 REMEDIATION 06/01/2000 Excavation T0605901151 ENFORCEMENT 09/15/2004 Closure/No Further Action Letter T0605901151 ENFORCEMENT 05/09/1990 Notice of Responsibility EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number ORANGE CO. LUST: Region: ORANGE Facility Id: 90UT120 Current Status: Certification (Case Closed) Released Substance: Gasoline -Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Date Closed: 09/15/2004 Case Type: Other Ground Water Record ID: RO0002257 LUST REG 8: Region: County: Regional Board: Facility Status: 8 Orange Santa Ana Region Case Closed S100230416 TC4671365.2s Page 51 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued) MAP FINDINGS Case Number: Local Case Num: Case Type: Substance: Qty Leaked: Abate Method: Cross Street: Enf Type: Funding: How Discovered: How Stopped: Leak Cause: Leak Source: Global ID: How Stopped Date: Enter Date: Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Discover Date: Enforcement Date: Close Date: Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Date Pollution Characterization Began: Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Date Remedial Action Underway: Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Enter Date: GW Qualifies: Soil Qualifies: Operator: Facility Contact: Interim: Oversite Program: Latitude: Longitude: MTBE Date: Max MTBE GW: MTBE Concentration: Max MTBE Soil: MTBE Fuel: MTBE Tested: MTBE Class: Staff: Staff Initials: Lead Agency: Local Agency: Hydr Basin #: Beneficial: Priority: Cleanup Fund Id: Work Suspended: Summary: Not reported NOTIFY 65: Date Reported: Not reported Staff Initials: Not reported Board File Number: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 083001510T 90UT120 Other ground water affected Gasoline 0 Not reported Not reported CLOS Not reported SA New Tank Unknown Tank T0605901151 9/9/9999 Not reported Not reported Not reported 4/25/1990 Not reported 5/20/2004 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 8/1/2002 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported LUST 33.6820635 -117.8857771 1/9/2002 51 0 6.9 1 MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detected CAB AR Local Agency 30000L Not reported MUN Not reported Not reported Not reported S100230416 TC4671365.2s Page 52 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued) Facility Type: Not reported Discharge Date: Not reported Issue Date: Not reported Incident Description: Not reported 30 ADVANCED PLATING TECHNOLOGY ENE 150 E STEVENS AVE 1/2-1 SANTA ANA, CA 92707 0.771 mi. 4070 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 35 ft. ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: 71003277 Inactive - Needs Evaluation Not reported Not reported Tiered Permit Tiered Permit Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported Not reported Cleanup Cypress 69 34 Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED Not reported 33.69474 -117.8673 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED CAL000070085 EPA Identification Number 71003277 Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Not reported Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S100230416 ENVIROSTOR S108741325 Orange Co. Industrial Site N/A TC4671365.2s Page 53 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 31 SE 1/2-1 0.811 mi. 4284 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 44 ft. ADVANCED PLATING TECHNOLOGY (Continued) Schedule Revised Date: Not reported Orange Co. Industrial Site Case ID: 11IC009 Record ID: RO0003561 Current Status: CLOSED 5/14/2012 Closure Type: Closure certification issued Released Chemical: Not reported PRIME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3183 REDHILL AVENUE COSTA MESA, CA 92626 ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: 71002874 Inactive - Needs Evaluation Not reported Not reported Tiered Permit Tiered Permit Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported Not reported Cleanup Cypress 74 37 Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED Not reported 33.64113 -117.9186 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED CAD981573108 EPA Identification Number 110009537518 EPA (FRS #) 71002874 Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S108741325 ENVIROSTOR S110494201 N/A TC4671365.2s Page 54 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 32 South 1/2-1 0.841 mi. 4439 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 44 ft. PRIME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Continued) Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported FRYE & SMITH, INC. 150 E. BAKER STREET COSTA MESA, CA 92626 ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: 71002615 No Further Action 05/20/2015 Not reported Tiered Permit Tiered Permit 4 NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported Robert Senga Cleanup Cypress 74 37 Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED Not reported 33.67967 -117.8772 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED CAD084456581 EPA Identification Number 71002615 Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Not reported Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S110494201 ENVIROSTOR S104582445 N/A TC4671365.2s Page 55 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 33 SSE 1/2-1 0.880 mi. 4647 ft. Relative: Higher Actual 47 ft. FRYE & SMITH, INC. (Continued) Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported CERADYNEINC 3169 REDHILL AVE COSTA MESA, CA 92626 ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Alias Name: Alias Type: 71002835 Inactive - Needs Evaluation Not reported Not reported Tiered Permit Tiered Permit Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported Not reported Cleanup Cypress 74 37 Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED Not reported 33.64113 -117.9186 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED CAD981424229 EPA Identification Number 71002835 Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Not reported Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S104582445 ENVIROSTOR 1005775296 WDS N/A TC4671365.2s Page 56 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CERADYNE INC (Continued) 1005775296 Schedule Revised Date: Not reported WDS: Facility ID: Santa Ana River 301012045 Facility Type: Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid or semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water pumping. Facility Status: Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that is under Waste Discharge Requirements. NPDES Number: CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7 are assigned by the Regional Board Subregion: 8 Facility Telephone: 7145490421 Facility Contact: FERNANDO HERNANDEZ Agency Name: CERADYNE INC Agency Address: 3169 REDHILL AVE Agency City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA 92626 Agency Contact: FERNANDO HERNANDEZ Agency Telephone: 7145490421 Agency Type: Private SIC Code: 0 SIC Code 2: Not reported Primary Waste Type: Not reported Primary Waste: Not reported Waste Type2: Not reported Waste2: Not reported Primary Waste Type: Not reported Secondary Waste: Not reported Secondary Waste Type: Not reported Design Flow: 0 Baseline Flow: 0 Reclamation: Not reported POTW: Not reported Treat To Water: Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board order should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to represent no threat to water quality. Complexity: Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such as cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as dairy waste ponds. TC4671365.2s Page 57 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site K34 SSE 1/2-1 0.881 mi. 4651 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 46 ft. SEMICOA 333 MCCORMICK AVENUE COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Site 1 of 2 in cluster K ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies: Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: Division Branch: Assembly: Senate: Special Program: Restricted Use: Site Mgmt Req: Funding: Latitude: Longitude: APN: Past Use: Potential COC: Confirmed COC: Potential Description: Alias Name: Alias Type: Completed Info MAP FINDINGS 60002151 Active 03/03/2015 Not reported Tiered Permit Tiered Permit 0.5 NO HWMP HWMP Violeta Mislang Robert Senga Cleanup Cypress 74 37 Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED Not Applicable 33.68044 -117.8720 NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED 60002151 Envirostor ID Number Completed Area Name: PROJECT WIDE Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Phase 1 Completed Date: 03/02/2015 Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported HAZNET: envid: S113000729 Year: 2013 GEPAID: CAD047429824 Contact: Eric Hersom Telephone: 7142423083 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number ENVIROSTOR S113000729 HAZNET N/A TC4671365.2s Page 58 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SEMICOA (Continued) S113000729 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 333 MCCORMICK AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926263422 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: ARD981057870 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another Site Tons: 0.99 Cat Decode: Not reported Method Decode: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another Site Facility County: Not reported envid: S113000729 Year: 2013 GEPAID: CAD047429824 Contact: Eric Hersom Telephone: 7142423083 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 333 MCCORMICK AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926263422 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAD044429835 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010 -H129) Or (H131 -H135) Tons: 0.025 Cat Decode: Not reported Method Decode: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010 -H129) Or (H131 -H135) Facility County: Not reported envid: S113000729 Year: 2013 GEPAID: CAD047429824 Contact: Eric Hersom Telephone: 7142423083 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 333 MCCORMICK AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926263422 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAD044429835 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129)Or(H131-H135) Tons: 0.0425 Cat Decode: Not reported Method Decode: Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site --No Treatment/Reovery (H010 -H129) Or (H131 -H135) Facility County: Not reported envid: S113000729 Year: 2013 GEPAID: CAD047429824 Contact: Eric Hersom TC4671365.2s Page 59 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SEMICOA (Continued) envid: Telephone: 7142423083 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 333 MCCORMICK AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926263422 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: CAT080013352 TSD County: Los Angeles Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Tons: 0.057 Cat Decode: Not reported Method Decode: Other Recovery Of Reclamation For Reuse Including Acid Regeneration, Organics Recovery Ect Facility County: Not reported S113000729 1000247282 CAD047429824 TC4671365.2s Page 60 envid: S113000729 Year: 2013 GEPAID: CAD047429824 Contact: Eric Hersom Telephone: 7142423083 Mailing Name: Not reported Mailing Address: 333 MCCORMICK AVE Mailing City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA, CA 926263422 Gen County: Orange TSD EPA ID: NVT330010000 TSD County: 99 Waste Category: Not reported Disposal Method: Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( To Include On -Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Tons: 0.535 Cat Decode: Not reported Method Decode: Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( To Include On -Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Facility County: Not reported Clock this h ynarlink while viewing on your computer to access 598 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. K35 SEMICOA RCRA-SQG SSE 333 MCCORMICK ENVIROSTOR 1/2-1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 FINDS 0.881 mi. WDS 4651 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster K ECHO Relative: RCRA-SQG: Higher Date form received by agency: 08/01/2012 Facility name: SEMICOA CORPORATION Actual: Facility address: 333 MCCORMICK AVE 46 ft. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 EPA ID: CAD047429824 Contact: SCOTT BEATTIE Contact address: 333 MCCORMICK AVE COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Contact country: us Contact telephone: 714-852-6330 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 09 S113000729 1000247282 CAD047429824 TC4671365.2s Page 60 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SEMICOA (Continued) Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: VANCE STREET CAPITAL Owner/operator address: 11150 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 750 Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: 310-231-7100 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: 08/01/2009 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: SEMICOA CORP Owner/operator address: Not reported Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Not reported Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: 09/01/2009 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: 181 U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: 181 Waste name: 181 Waste code: 214 Waste name: 214 Waste code: 221 Waste name: 221 Waste code: 331 Waste name: 331 1000247282 TC4671365.2s Page 61 Map ID D002 MAP FINDINGS Direction Waste code: D011 Distance SILVER EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number Waste code: SEMICOA (Continued) 1000247282 THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL Waste code: 352 Waste name: 352 MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT Waste code: 551 Waste name: 551 SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR Waste code: 791 Waste name: 791 MIXTURES. Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D002 Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE Waste code: F003 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 09/30/2009 Site name: SEMICOA CORPORATION Classification: Small Quantity Generator Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D002 Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE Waste code: D011 Waste name: SILVER Waste code: D035 Waste name: METHYL ETHYL KETONE Waste code: F003 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: F005 TC4671365.2s Page 62 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SEMICOA (Continued) 1000247282 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Date form received by agency: 02/24/2009 Site name: SEMICOA ACQUISITION CORP Classification: Small Quantity Generator Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D002 Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE Waste code: F003 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: F005 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Date form received by agency: 09/04/1986 Site name: SEMICOA Classification: Small Quantity Generator Violation Status ENVIROSTOR: Facility ID: Status: Status Date: Site Code: Site Type: Site Type Detailed: Acres: NPL: Regulatory Agencies Lead Agency: Program Manager: Supervisor: No violations found 71002417 Inactive - Needs Evaluation Not reported Not reported Tiered Permit Tiered Permit Not reported NO NONE SPECIFIED NONE SPECIFIED Not reported Not reported TC4671365.2s Page 63 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SEMICOA (Continued) 1000247282 Division Branch: Cleanup Cypress Assembly: 74 Senate: 37 Special Program: Not reported Restricted Use: NO Site Mgmt Req: NONE SPECIFIED Funding: Not reported Latitude: 33.68043 Longitude: -117.8720 APN: NONE SPECIFIED Past Use: NONE SPECIFIED Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIED Confirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED Potential Description: NONE SPECIFIED Alias Name: CAD047429824 Alias Type: EPA Identification Number Alias Name: 110002646904 Alias Type: EPA (FRS #) Alias Name: 71002417 Alias Type: Envirostor ID Number Completed Info: Completed Area Name: Not reported Completed Sub Area Name: Not reported Completed Document Type: Not reported Completed Date: Not reported Comments: Not reported Future Area Name: Not reported Future Sub Area Name: Not reported Future Document Type: Not reported Future Due Date: Not reported Schedule Area Name: Not reported Schedule Sub Area Name: Not reported Schedule Document Type: Not reported Schedule Due Date: Not reported Schedule Revised Date: Not reported FINDS: Registry ID: 110002646904 Environmental Interest/Information System California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT MAJOR RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. TC4671365.2s Page 64 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site SEMICOA (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number WDS: Facility ID: Santa Ana River 301017777 Facility Type: Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid or semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water pumping. Facility Status: Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that is under Waste Discharge Requirements. NPDES Number: CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7 are assigned by the Regional Board Subregion: 8 Facility Telephone: 7149791900 Facility Contact: GERRI GIBB Agency Name: SEMICOA Agency Address: 333 MCCORMICK Agency City,St,Zip: COSTA MESA 92626 Agency Contact: GERRI GIBB Agency Telephone: 7149791900 Agency Type: Private SIC Code: 0 SIC Code 2: Not reported Primary Waste Type: Not reported Primary Waste: Not reported Waste Type2: Not reported Waste2: Not reported Primary Waste Type: Not reported Secondary Waste: Not reported Secondary Waste Type: Not reported Design Flow: 0 Baseline Flow: 0 Reclamation: Not reported POTW: Not reported Treat To Water: Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board order should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to represent no threat to water quality. Complexity: Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such as cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as dairy waste ponds. ECHO: Envid: 1000247282 Registry ID: 110002646904 DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002646904 1000247282 TC4671365.2s Page 65 Count: 6 records. City EDR ID Site Name ORPHAN SUMMARY Site Address COSTA MESA S108985881 SAKIOKA FARMS 3183-A SW SUNFLOWER SANTA ANA S108985898 BRISTOL PLAZA CALIF CLEANERS BRISTOL STREET SANTA ANA S103249116 ASTRO OIL SERVICE STATION 1441 BRISTOL ST SANTA ANA 1000288485 SHELL OIL 1512 BRISTOL SANTA ANA S103641258 ARCO #0192 2100 BRISTOL ST SANTA ANA S108985904 SUNFLOWER PLAZA METRO CLEANERS SUNFLOWER TC4671365.2s Page 66 Zip Database(s) SLIC SLIC 92707 LUST, HIST CORTESE 92707 LUST 92707 LUST SLIC GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 NPL Site Boundaries Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 EPA Region 5 Telephone 312-886-6686 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4246 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4671365.2s Page GR -1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Federal CERCLIS list Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2016 Number of Days to Update: 135 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SEMS -ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC4671365.2s Page GR -2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS -ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Federal RCRA generators list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4671365.2s Page GR -3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2016 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2016 Telephone: 202-267-2180 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2016 Number of Days to Update: 51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2016 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2016 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program's (SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifies sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly -contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2016 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2016 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 05/16/2016 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2016 Telephone: 916-341-6320 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC4671365.2s Page GR -5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Telephone: 805-542-4786 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Telephone: 213-576-6710 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, EI Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Telephone: 916-464-4834 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Telephone: 530-542-5572 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Telephone: 760-241-7365 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Telephone: 760-776-8943 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. TC4671365.2s Page GR -6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Telephone: 707-570-3769 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Telephone: 510-622-2433 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST: Geotracker's Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. For more information on a particular leaking underground storage tank sites, please contact the appropriate regulatory agency. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2016 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016 Telephone: see region list Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 61 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Telephone: 858-637-5595 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Telephone: 909-782-4496 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. TC4671365.2s Page GR -7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 118 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 10/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 105 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 02/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 10/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 112 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2016 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016 Telephone: 866-480-1028 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 61 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Telephone: 707-576-2220 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Telephone: 510-286-0457 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Telephone: 805-549-3147 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Telephone: 213-576-6600 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Telephone: 916-464-3291 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 16 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC4671365.2s Page GR -9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Telephone: 619-241-6583 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Telephone: 530-542-5574 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Telephone: 760-346-7491 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Telephone: 951-782-3298 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Number of Days to Update: 11 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Telephone: 858-467-2980 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 03/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2009 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2009 Telephone: 916-327-5092 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 12/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 120 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 119 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 37 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC's costs. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4671365.2s Page GR -12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 State and tribal Brownfields sites Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 12/22/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4671365.2s Page GR -13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/15/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 54 HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 04/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 05/13/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL -SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. TC4671365.2s Page GR -14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/10/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 88 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990's. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. TC4671365.2s Page GR -15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2016 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Local Land Records Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/11/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder's office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 57 Records of Emergency Release Reports Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 06/24/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 04/11/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2016 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing The State Water Resources Control Board and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards partner with the Department of Defense (DoD) through the Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement (DSMOA) to oversee the investigation and remediation of water quality issues at military facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2016 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4671365.2s Page GR -17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Other Ascertainable Records Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. TC4671365.2s Page GR -18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. TC4671365.2s Page GR -19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 133 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4671365.2s Page GR -20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2016 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4671365.2s Page GR -21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 07/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC4671365.2s Page GR -22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Telephone: 202-366-4595 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Telephone: Varies Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2016 Number of Days to Update: 46 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 03/11/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/15/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. TC4671365.2s Page GR -23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931 and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 02/09/2016 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016 Telephone: 303-231-5959 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 44 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. TC4671365.2s Page GR -24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C -DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 07/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 55 UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 10/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 571-373-0407 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal -Sites). TC4671365.2s Page GR -25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/28/2016 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2016 Telephone: 916-323-3400 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2016 Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner's agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 02/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 01/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 04/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2016 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2016 Telephone: 916-341-6066 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Number of Days to Update: 38 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. TC4671365.2s Page GR -26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/14/2015 Telephone: 916-255-1136 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/11/2015 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 04/11/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 02/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. TC4671365.2s Page GR -27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2016 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/2016 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 02/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/13/2016 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical -laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water board?s review found that more than one-third of the region?s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 04/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/25/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. TC4671365.2s Page GR -28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 103 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2016 Number of Days to Update: 86 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. TC4671365.2s Page GR -29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: State Water Resources Control Board Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 182 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2016 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2016 Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC4671365.2s Page GR -30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 06/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 12 BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 18 CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 04/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Number of Days to Update: 45 COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Number of Days to Update: 22 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 02/24/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 35 DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 04/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 50 EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 37 FRESNO COUNTY: Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: EI Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA's are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 04/04/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 28 a�Jdil:I�]��ltK�1�1►��/i CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 44 IMPERIAL COUNTY: Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Number of Days to Update: 50 INYO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2013 Number of Days to Update: 33 KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 KINGS COUNTY: Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county's Certified Unified Program Agency database. California's Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 05/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 26 LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Number of Days to Update: 51 LOS ANGELES COUNTY: Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 38 List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/13/2016 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of EI Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in EI Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: City of EI Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 11/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/17/2015 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4671365.2s Page GR -34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 36 MADERA COUNTY: Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county's Certified Unified Program Agency database. California's Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 03/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 04/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 36 MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 64 MONO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 05/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 21 MONTEREY COUNTY: Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-499-6647 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 47 NAPA COUNTY: Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2011 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2011 Telephone: 707-253-4269 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2012 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/15/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2008 Number of Days to Update: 23 NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Number of Days to Update: 42 ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non -petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/17/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4671365.2s Page GR -36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 21 PLACER COUNTY: Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/11/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2016 Telephone: 530-745-2363 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/13/2016 Source: Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2016 Telephone: 951-358-5055 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2016 Number of Days to Update: 24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 04/13/2016 Source: Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2016 Telephone: 951-358-5055 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2016 Number of Days to Update: 47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean -Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2016 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2016 Telephone: 916-875-8406 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2016 Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2016 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2016 Telephone: 916-875-8406 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: TC4671365.2s Page GR -37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2016 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2016 Telephone: 909-387-3041 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment 'H' permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non -tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 09/23/2013 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/24/2013 Telephone: 619-338-2268 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2015 Source: Department of Health Services Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2015 Telephone: 619-338-2209 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Telephone: 619-338-2371 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 24 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned [.y 1►��:71►[�76YK�ZK�1�1►1�i Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Telephone: 415-252-3920 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2016 Number of Days to Update: 10 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4671365.2s Page GR -38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 5 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 26 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 28 SAN MATEO COUNTY: Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2016 Telephone: 650-363-1921 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2016 Last EDR Contact: 05/27/2016 Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/15/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 55 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. TC4671365.2s Page GR -39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/10/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016 Number of Days to Update: 51 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 19 SHASTA COUNTY: Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4671365.2s Page GR -40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 03/18/2016 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2016 Telephone: 530-225-5789 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2016 Number of Days to Update: 44 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2016 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2016 Telephone: 707-784-6770 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2016 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2016 Telephone: 707-784-6770 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2016 Number of Days to Update: 44 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 04/05/2016 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2016 Telephone: 707-565-1174 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016 Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 SUTTER COUNTY: Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2016 Telephone: 530-822-7500 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 16 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TUOLUMNE COUNTY: TC4671365.2s Page GR -41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/03/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/10/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Number of Days to Update: 38 VENTURA COUNTY: Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2016 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2016 Number of Days to Update: 49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 05/13/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2016 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016 Telephone: 805-654-2813 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2016 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2016 Number of Days to Update: 54 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 48 YOLO COUNTY: Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4671365.2s Page GR -42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2016 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2016 Telephone: 530-666-8646 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016 Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 04/29/2016 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2016 Telephone: 530-749-7523 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016 Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Telephone: 860-424-3375 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Last EDR Contact: 05/13/2016 Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2016 Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2016 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2016 Telephone: 518-402-8651 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2016 Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4671365.2s Page GR -43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2015 Telephone: 717-783-8990 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2015 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Telephone: 401-222-2797 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2016 Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. TC4671365.2s Page GR -44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4671365.2s Page GR -45 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS STARWOOD TRIBUTE HOTEL PROJECT 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS COSTA MESA, CA 92626 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Version Date: East Map: Version Date: 33.691655 - 33° 41'29.96" 117.880157 - 117' 52' 48.57" Zone 11 418423.8 3728122.2 31 ft. above sea level 5640950 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 2012 5640942 TUSTIN, CA 2012 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC4671365.2s Page A-1 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General NW SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES c _o � OWO OWO r N N W W N N � IWV W T f0 N N N North I South TP C 0 O O {p N West TP Target Property Elevation: 31 ft. East 1/2 1 Miles Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC4671365.2s Page A-2 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Target Property County ORANGE, CA Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Property COSTA MESA HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 06059C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data Not Reported NWI Electronic Data Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Site -Specific Hydrogeological Data*: Search Radius: 1.25 miles Location Relative to TP: 1 - 2 Miles South Site Name: Western Digital Corporation Site EPA ID Number: CAD051983567 Surficial Aquifer Flow Dir.: South Measured Depth to Water: 35.5 feet. Hydraulic Connection: Aquifers underlying the site are hydraulically connected. Sole Source Aquifer: No information about a sole source aquifer is available Data Quality: Information based on site-specific subsurface investigations is documented in the CERCLIS investigation report(s) AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW 2 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NE SSW, NNW, SW 3 1/4 - 1/2 Mile West SW ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. TC4671 365.26 Page A-3 MAP ID 5 A7 A8 B9 12 16 21 24 G25 G27 H28 H29 31 32 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY LOCATION FROM TP 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 1/2 - 1 Mile East 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile NE 1/2 - 1 Mile NE 1/2-1 Mile East 1/2 - 1 Mile East 1/2-1 Mile South 1/2 - 1 Mile SW GENERAL DIRECTION GROUNDWATER FLOW W SE SE Not Reported Not Reported WSW Not Reported Not Reported SW NW Not Reported Not Reported NNE SW For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. TC4671365.2s Page A-4 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratifed Sequence System: Quaternary Series: Quaternary Code: Q (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). TC4671365.2s Page A-5 SSURGO SOIL MAP - 4671365.2s Target Property SSURGO Soil Water 0 1/I6 18 14 Miles SITE NAME: Starwood Tribute Hotel Project CLIENT: Bonterra Psomas ADDRESS: 3350 Avenue of The Arts CONTACT: Megan Larum Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY #: 4671365.2s LAT/LONG: 33.691655/117.880157 DATE: July 12, 2016 1:45 pm Copyright (c) 2016 EDR, Inc. (c) 2015 TornTom Rel. 2015. GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: OMNI Soil Surface Texture: clay Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: hydraulic conductivity Hydric Status: Not hydric Layer Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 16 inches clay Not reported Not reported Max: 1.4 Max: 9 Min: Min: 0.42 7.9 2 16 inches 59 inches silty clay Not reported Not reported Max: 1.4 Max: 9 Min: Min: 0.42 7.9 LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE Federal USGS Federal FRDS PWS State Database SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) 1.000 Nearest PWS within 0.001 miles 1.000 TC4671365.2s Page A-7 GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 1 USGS40000136835 1/8 -1/4 Mile NNW 4 USGS40000136878 1/4 -1/2 Mile NE 6 USGS40000136831 1/2-1 Mile WNW D11 USGS40000136687 1/2-1 Mile SSW C14 USGS40000136820 1/2-1 Mile East C15 USGS40000136830 1/2-1 Mile ENE B18 USGS40000137011 1/2-1 Mile NNW E20 USGS40000136669 1/2-1 Mile South F23 USGS40000137065 1/2-1 Mile NNW FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP C10 CADW60000034153 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE D13 CADW60000021930 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW 17 CADW60000017202 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW 19 7058 1/2 - 1 Mile SW E22 CADW60000021931 1/2 - 1 Mile South F26 CADW60000009606 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 30 CADW60000021177 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 1 CAOG11000217945 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE 2 CAOG11000222240 1/2 - 1 Mile SW TC4671365.2s Page A-8 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 4671365.2s A/ County Boundary 0 1 is 1 12 1 M Iles N Major Roads N Contour Lines Groundwater Flow Direction Earthquake Fault Lines c Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location bG Airports c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater H D Closest Hydrogeological Data ® Water Wells • Oil, gas or related wells © Public Water Supply Wells ® Cluster of Multiple Icons SITE NAME: Starwood Tribute Hotel Project CLIENT: Bonterra Psomas ADDRESS: 3350 Avenue of The Arts CONTACT: Megan Larum Costa Mesa CA 92626 INQUIRY#: 4671365.2s LAT/LONG: 33.691655/117.880157 DATE: July 12, 2016 1:45 pm Copyright Cb 2016 EDR, Inc. (0 2015 TornTom Rel. 2015. GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 1 18070204 NNW Drainagearea Units: 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Contrib drainagearea: Lower Not Reported Org.Identifier: USGS-CA Formal name: USGS California Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-334139117524901 Monloc name: 005S010W36L001 S Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 18070204 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -117.8811677 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: Unknown Horiz Acc measure units: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Not Reported Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: Not Reported Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: Not Reported Vertcollection method: Not Reported Vert coord refsys: Not Reported Countrycode: Aquifername: California Coastal Basin aquifers Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 2 Site ID: 083001241T NE Groundwater Flow: SSW, NNW, SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 8 Higher Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: 10 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 02/03/1994 3 Site ID: 083000754T West Groundwater Flow: SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 20 Date: 04/14/1998 4 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher Database EDR ID Number FED USGS USGS40000136835 Not Reported Not Reported 33.6941858 Not Reported Unknown Not Reported Not Reported US Not Reported Not Reported AQUIFLOW 65039 AQUIFLOW 65322 FED USGS USGS40000136878 TC4671365.2s Page A-10 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Org.Identifier: USGS-CA USGS California Water Science Center Formal name: USGS California Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-334149117522901 Monloc name: 005S010W36G001 S Not Reported Monloc type: Well 18070204 Drainagearea value: Monloc desc: NAWQA DATA ENTRY COM.+ VER. Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Huc code: 18070203 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 33.6969056 Longitude: -117.8747389 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: .5 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Global positioning system (GPS), uncorrected Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 33.0 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 2.5 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: California Coastal Basin aquifers Formation type: Quaternary Alluvium Aquifer type: Unconfined single aquifer Construction date: 19991106 Welldepth: 20 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 20 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 5 Site ID: 083001181T NW Groundwater Flow: W AQUIFLOW 37893 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Lower Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 11.12 Date: 01/31/1999 6 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Org. Identifier: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Huc code: Drainagearea Units: Contrib drainagearea units Longitude: Horiz Acc measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: FED USGS USGS-CA USGS California Water Science Center USGS-334138117532101 005S010W35KO01S Well Not Reported 18070204 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Not Reported Latitude: 33.6939079 -117.8900569 Sourcemap scale: 24000 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Interpolated from map NAD83 Vert measure val: 32.70 feet Vertacc measure val: .10 feet Level or other surveying method NGVD29 Countrycode: US California Coastal Basin aquifers Not Reported USGS40000136831 TC4671365.2s Page A-11 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: 780 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 366 Feet below Feet to Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- 1986-08-13 57.52 ------------------------------------------------- 1986-04-29 47.40 1986-02-11 48.99 1985-11-04 48.13 1985-08-07 57.62 1985-05-08 34.86 1985-04-15 34.17 1985-03-12 29.10 1985-02-13 33.69 1984-10-25 46.34 1984-10-09 45.71 1984-09-06 44.93 1984-08-14 44.68 1984-08-07 43.56 1984-07-03 40.41 1984-06-04 37.45 1984-05-10 33.12 1984-05-07 32.27 1984-04-02 24.59 1984-03-07 25.20 1984-02-06 27.71 1983-11-04 37.98 1983-10-13 38.83 1983-09-01 50.72 1983-08-10 48.96 1983-08-02 48.42 1983-07-05 44.83 1983-06-09 42.22 1983-05-12 37.40 1983-04-15 39.81 1983-02-09 39.52 1982-11-05 43.47 1982-08-04 48.25 1982-05-06 36.55 1982-01-29 37.55 1981-11-05 43.99 1981-07-30 41.93 1981-05-15 30.51 1981-02-09 32.85 1980-11-03 35.95 1980-08-27 42.10 1980-06-13 37.01 1980-02-06 40.91 1979-11-08 45.71 1979-08-06 50.94 1979-05-02 36.66 1979-02-05 41.61 1978-10-25 50.21 1978-09-29 50.47 1977-10-26 59.3 1977-03-15 53.3 1977-01-12 53.7 1976-10-29 53.2 1976-05-11 41.7 1976-03-11 42.1 1976-01-12 41.2 1975-11-04 47.6 1975-08-27 46.5 1975-07-08 47.3 1975-05-05 35.2 1975-03-14 36.2 1975-01-09 41.3 1974-10-23 43.6 1974-09-06 48.3 1974-07-09 46.5 1974-05-06 29.0 1974-03-21 24.9 1974-01-31 32.9 1973-11-05 40.4 1973-09-13 42.5 1973-07-10 45.3 1973-05-11 38.8 1973-03-13 33.1 1972-11-06 40.7 1972-09-08 47.1 1972-07-12 41.6 1972-05-05 32.2 1972-04-16 23.33 1972-03-03 26.0 1972-01-13 27.0 1971-09-02 30.0 1971-07-16 33.3 1971-06-17 26.0 1971-05-06 25.8 1971-04-16 25.0 1970-11-05 29.8 1970-10-08 30.8 1970-08-12 27.8 1970-05-05 24.1 1970-01-05 15.0 1969-10-08 21.0 1969-09-08 21.9 1969-07-07 20.6 1969-06-12 19.9 1969-05-07 21.7 1968-11-27 24.4 1968-10-29 27.7 1968-10-09 29.8 1968-09-16 31.7 1968-07-16 30.7 TC4671365.2s Page A-12 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Ground -water levels, continued. Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1968-06-12 30.2 1968-05-03 28.0 1968-04-15 26.7 1968-03-12 26.7 1968-01-04 17.7 1967-12-06 18.7 1967-11-13 24.9 1967-10-06 29.2 1967-09-14 29.1 1967-08-21 28.4 1967-07-19 24.3 1967-06-08 18.1 1967-05-09 16.9 1967-04-13 14.9 1967-03-08 25.7 1966-12-16 16.8 1966-11-14 24.6 1966-10-19 28.7 1966-09-20 31.1 1966-08-11 33.5 1966-07-14 27.2 1966-06-13 23.8 1966-05-11 24.38 1966-04-20 22.0 1965-12-28 14.75 1965-11-29 18.25 1965-10-20 27.3 1965-09-21 25.97 1965-08-09 23.58 1965-07-14 25.00 1965-06-22 22.81 1965-05-14 25.31 1965-04-16 19.57 1965-03-17 31.65 1964-12-11 19.99 1964-11-10 21.25 1964-10-14 29.71 1964-09-16 34.08 1964-08-18 34.05 1964-07-14 30.05 1964-06-16 28.56 1964-05-12 29.51 1964-04-15 30.63 1964-03-17 36.92 1963-12-13 24.24 1963-11-19 26.78 1963-10-08 32.73 1963-09-13 40.82 1963-08-13 41.65 1963-07-16 40.02 1963-06-14 36.32 1963-05-14 40.47 1963-04-12 42.51 1963-03-21 50.0 1962-12-13 35.29 1962-11-16 37.34 1962-10-11 44.74 1962-09-18 47.29 1962-08-14 52.74 1962-07-13 49.9 1962-06-14 45.0 1962-05-17 47.72 1962-04-13 48.05 1962-03-15 52.99 1961-12-15 47.15 1961-11-16 54.88 1961-10-13 58.76 1961-09-19 60.27 1961-08-15 64.14 1961-07-18 68.69 1961-06-13 61.04 1961-05-16 67.51 1961-04-18 64.78 1961-03-16 79.02 1960-12-15 47.31 1960-11-22 52.51 1960-10-18 59.46 1960-09-15 62.87 1960-08-16 63.82 1960-07-14 66.72 1960-06-14 58.55 1960-05-18 61.66 1960-04-14 69.21 1959-12-11 60.28 1959-11-19 62.09 1959-10-15 68.94 1959-09-10 72.31 1959-08-17 70.94 1959-07-17 73.77 1959-06-16 66.37 1959-05-14 64.22 1959-04-16 67.46 1959-03-13 70.70 1958-12-12 56.92 1958-11-17 57.12 1958-10-16 61.79 1958-08-15 63.90 1958-06-19 59.17 1958-05-15 56.32 1958-04-21 50.22 1958-03-18 56.66 1957-12-12 57.98 1957-11-15 59.13 1957-10-17 65.23 1957-09-19 76.05 1957-06-13 67.54 1957-05-16 62.74 1957-04-16 78.35 1957-03-15 78.99 1956-12-13 69.23 TC4671365.2s Page A-13 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Ground -water levels, continued. Feet below Feet to Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- 1956-11-13 67.05 ------------------------------------------------- 1956-10-16 68.83 1956-09-14 74.08 1956-08-16 72.11 1956-07-17 71.54 1956-06-19 62.50 1956-05-15 58.86 1956-04-17 61.98 1956-03-15 69.92 1955-12-13 54.96 1955-11-15 60.79 1955-10-13 64.12 1955-09-19 68.78 1955-08-16 69.81 1955-07-12 70.23 1955-06-14 60.31 1955-05-13 60.01 1955-04-15 68.69 1954-12-16 53.78 1954-11-18 57.59 1954-10-15 62.42 1954-09-23 65.37 1954-08-23 68.91 1954-07-15 72.90 1954-06-15 68.33 1954-04-15 58.91 1954-04-14 58.28 1953-12-10 56.02 1953-11-17 59.33 1953-10-20 62.82 1953-09-17 66.12 1953-08-18 67.56 1953-06-16 60.03 1953-05-14 59.94 1953-04-16 67.68 1953-01-16 44.14 1952-12-11 47.52 1952-11-13 52.3 1952-09-16 58.5 1952-08-14 59.43 1952-07-15 64.84 1952-06-17 50.99 1952-05-15 45.66 1952-04-17 45.66 1952-01-15 54.32 1951-12-14 55.35 1951-11-15 57.99 1951-10-16 60.77 1951-09-20 62.86 1951-08-16 68.58 1951-07-17 73.43 1951-06-19 61.92 1951-05-15 60.53 1951-04-13 66.07 1950-12-19 48.79 1950-11-21 51.11 1950-10-20 54.02 1950-09-15 55.49 1950-08-10 60.23 1950-06-16 51.24 1950-05-16 50.42 1950-04-18 55.88 1950-01-19 39.3 1949-12-15 43.96 1949-11-18 45.39 1949-10-20 49.53 1949-09-15 50.09 1949-08-16 57.83 1949-07-19 64.88 1949-06-16 48.94 1949-05-17 46.72 1949-04-19 51.71 1949-01-20 34.34 1948-12-17 37.05 1948-11-19 39.13 1948-10-21 41.98 1948-09-16 44.03 1948-08-13 50.71 1948-07-20 51.29 1948-06-18 42.04 1948-05-21 41.13 1948-04-16 51.12 1948-03-16 62.26 1947-12-16 27.32 1947-11-19 31.8 1947-10-17 33.78 1947-09-19 37.73 1947-08-15 42.04 1947-07-22 43.40 1947-06-17 34.34 1947-05-13 31.98 1947-04-11 35.13 1947-03-12 33.34 1947-02-11 90.51 Note: The site was being pumped. 1947-01-17 16.30 1946-12-12 19.95 1946-10-22 23.58 1946-10-14 30.59 1946-09-16 33.21 1946-08-16 34.91 1946-07-19 37.14 1946-06-18 26.61 1946-05-13 23.63 1946-04-12 23.06 1946-03-15 89.57 Note: The site was being pumped. TC4671365.2s Page A-14 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Ground -water levels, continued. Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1946-02-14 88.42 Note: The site was being pumped. 1946-01-17 14.92 1945-11-14 19.61 1945-09-20 25.58 1945-07-12 25.85 1945-05-15 14.53 1945-03-13 22.33 1945-02-15 82.89 Note: The site was being pumped. 1945-01-15 84.07 Note: The site was being pumped. 1944-12-12 14.52 1944-10-16 23.18 1944-08-11 29.42 1944-07-13 92.62 Note: The site was being pumped. 1944-06-13 18.44 1944-04-13 16.13 1944-03-14 87.46 Note: The site was being pumped. 1944-02-15 88.13 Note: The site was being pumped. 1944-01-13 16.05 1943-11-09 23.32 1943-09-13 27.28 1943-07-13 28.8 1943-05-18 17.75 1943-03-16 24.55 1943-02-15 85.48 Note: The site was being pumped. 1943-01-12 20.05 1942-11-19 21.73 1942-09-25 25.86 1942-07-17 29.73 1942-05-19 19.47 1942-03-17 89.27 Note: The site was being pumped. 1942-02-17 89.65 Note: The site was being pumped. 1942-01-09 12.07 1941-11-28 17.41 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1945-12-17 17.39 1945-10-09 25.12 1945-08-17 28.76 1945-06-12 19.93 1945-04-17 13.67 1944-11-13 17.68 1944-09-14 25.01 1944-05-12 16.24 1943-12-13 20.22 1943-10-11 26.63 1943-08-12 32.33 1943-06-10 19.73 1943-04-19 15.38 1942-12-21 21.61 1942-10-22 24.83 1942-08-20 28.47 1942-06-16 21.53 1941-12-23 13.86 A7 Site ID: 083000430T SSW Groundwater Flow: SE AQUIFLOW 68226 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: 22.15 Deep Water Depth: 25.6 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 03/31/1999 A8 Site ID: 083000430T SSW Groundwater Flow: SE AQUIFLOW 68227 1/2-1 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: 22.15 Deep Water Depth: 25.6 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 03/31/1999 TC4671365.2s Page A-15 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Database EDR ID Number 139 Site ID: 083000981T NNW Groundwater Flow: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 65137 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 10.66 Higher Local well name: " Well use id: Deep Water Depth: 12.99 Unknown Average Water Depth: Not Reported County name: Date: 11/13/1998 C10 Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County ENE 80238 CA WELLS CADW60000034153 1/2 - 1 Mile Site id: CADW60000034153 Higher Monloc type: Well Objectid: 34153 Latitude: 33.6939 Longitude: -117.8685 Site code: 336939N1178685W001 State well numbe: 05S09W31 M002S Local well name: " Well use id: 6 Well use descrip: Unknown County id: 30 County name: Orange Basin code: '8-1' Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County Dwr region id: 80238 Dwr region: Southern Region Office Site id: CADW60000034153 D11 SSW FED USGS USGS40000136687 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-CA Formal name: USGS California Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-334055117530001 Monloc name: 006SO10W01 EO02S Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 18070204 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 33.681964 Longitude: -117.8842234 Sourcemap scale: Not Reported Horiz Acc measure: Unknown Horiz Acc measure units: Unknown Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Not Reported Vert measure units: Not Reported Vertacc measure val: Not Reported Vert accmeasure units: Not Reported Vertcollection method: Not Reported Vert coord refsys: Not Reported Countrycode: US Aquifername: California Coastal Basin aquifers Formation type: Not Reported TC4671365.2s Page A-16 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 12 Site ID: 083001510T SSW Groundwater Flow: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 65353 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: Higher Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 23.5 Date: 10/15/1992 D13 SSW USGS California Water Science Center 1/2 - 1 Mile USGS-334135117520101 Higher Objectid: 21930 Latitude: 33.6818 Longitude: -117.884 Site code: 336818N1178840W001 State well numbe: 06S10W01 E002S Local well name: " Well use id: 6 Well use descrip: Unknown County id: 30 County name: Orange Basin code: 18-1' Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County Dwr region id: 80238 Dwr region: Southern Region Office Site id: CADW60000021930 C14 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org. Identifier: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Huc code: Drainagearea Units: Contrib drainagearea units Longitude: Horiz Acc measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: CA WELLS CADW60000021930 FED USGS USGS-CA USGS California Water Science Center USGS-334135117520101 005S009W31 M003S Well Not Reported 18070204 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Not Reported Latitude: 33.6930748 -117.867834 Sourcemap scale: Not Reported Unknown Horiz Acc measure units: Unknown Interpolated from map NAD83 Vert measure val: Not Reported Not Reported Vertacc measure val: Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Countrycode: US California Coastal Basin aquifers Not Reported USGS40000136820 TC4671365.2s Page A-17 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 C15 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org. Identifier: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Huc code: Drainagearea Units: Contrib drainagearea units Longitude: Horiz Acc measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: Aquifer type: Construction date: Welldepth units: Wellholedepth units: FED USGS USGS40000136830 USGS-CA USGS California Water Science Center USGS-334138117520001 005S009W31 M002S Well Not Reported 18070204 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Not Reported Latitude: 33.6939081 -117.8675562 Sourcemap scale: 24000 1 Interpolated from map NAD83 feet feet Level or other surveying method NGVD29 California Coastal Basin aquifers Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 60 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Vert measure val: Vertacc measure val Countrycode: Welldepth: Wellholedepth: Date 34.30 .10 US Not Reported 458 Feet below Feet to Surface Sealevel 1986-08-19 55.72 1986-04-29 45.08 1986-03-04 42.97 1985-11-05 45.65 1985-08-19 59.13 1985-05-14 33.79 1985-02-14 30.12 1984-10-30 43.73 1984-08-07 41.50 1984-05-10 32.00 1984-02-06 25.05 1983-11-07 32.99 1983-08-12 42.80 1983-05-13 31.29 1983-02-09 32.74 1982-11-04 37.80 1982-08-04 42.09 1982-05-07 30.11 1982-01-29 30.40 1981-11-04 39.90 1981-07-31 40.31 1981-05-12 22.84 1981-02-09 26.35 1980-11-03 30.94 1980-08-27 35.22 1980-06-13 31.10 1980-02-08 34.79 1979-11-13 37.67 1979-08-02 42.87 1979-05-02 32.14 1979-02-08 33.92 1978-11-02 42.24 1978-09-29 41.77 1976-03-20 46.70 1976-02-27 45.80 1975-06-26 39.10 1975-05-01 36.20 1975-03-04 46.80 TC4671365.2s Page A-18 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Ground -water levels, continued. Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1974-12-30 35.50 1974-10-25 43.60 1974-09-04 50.90 1974-03-19 35.90 1974-01-28 37.70 Org.Identifier: 1973-11-02 40.10 1973-08-30 47.70 Monloc Identifier: 1973-07-09 53.60 1973-05-10 39.90 1973-03-05 32.90 1973-01-11 39.00 Not Reported 1972-11-02 42.30 1972-09-06 47.50 Drainagearea Units: 1972-07-11 47.40 1972-05-04 46.00 Latitude: 1972-03-01 38.60 1972-01-12 24.30 1971-11-05 29.90 1971-08-31 36.30 1971-06-14 25.80 1971-05-04 27.20 1971-03-04 19.10 16 Site ID: 083000572T NW Groundwater Flow: WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 8.11 Lower Deep Water Depth: 15.37 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 04/16/1999 17 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Objectid: 17202 Latitude: 33.6967 Longitude: -117.8918 Site code: 336967N 1 178918WO01 State well numbe: 05S 10W35G001 S Local well name: " Well use id: 6 Well use descrip: Unknown County id: 30 County name: Orange Basin code: '8-1' Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County Dwr region id: 80238 Dwr region: Southern Region Office Site id: CADW60000017202 B18 NNW 1/2 -11 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-CA Formal name: USGS California Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-334205117530701 Monloc name: 005S010W35AO01S Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 18070204 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -117.8861678 Sourcemap scale: AQUIFLOW 67216 CA WELLS CADW60000017202 FED USGS USGS40000137011 Not Reported Not Reported 33.7014077 Not Reported TC4671365.2s Page A-19 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Acc measure: Unknown Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure units: Not Reported Vert accmeasure units: Not Reported Vertcollection method: Not Reported Vert coord refsys: Not Reported Aquifername: California Coastal Basin aquifers Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 19 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Water System Information: Horiz Acc measure units: Vert measure val: Vertacc measure val Countrycode Welldepth: Wellholedepth: Prime Station Code: 06S/10W-02H03 S User ID: FRDS Number: 3000572001 County: District Number: 08 Station Type: Water Type: Well/Groundwater Well Status: Source Lat/Long: 334057.0 1175313.0 Precision: Source Name: WELL 01 PAULARINO ST WELL - DESTROYED 18070204 System Number: 3000572 Not Reported System Name: PAULARINO WATER ASSOCIATION Not Reported Organization That Operates System: 33.6797418 -117.88089 Not Reported Not Reported Pop Served: Unknown, Small System Connections: Area Served: Not Reported E20 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org. Identifier: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Huc code: Drainagearea Units: Contrib drainagearea units Longitude: Horiz Acc measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: Unknown Not Reported Not Reported US Not Reported Not Reported CA WELLS 7058 TEE Orange WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE Destroyed 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds) Unknown, Small System FED USGS USGS-CA USGS California Water Science Center USGS-334047117524801 006S010W01 L001 S Well Not Reported 18070204 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Not Reported Latitude: 33.6797418 -117.88089 Sourcemap scale: Not Reported Unknown Horiz Acc measure units: Unknown Interpolated from map NAD83 Vert measure val: Not Reported Not Reported Vertacc measure val: Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Countrycode: US California Coastal Basin aquifers Not Reported USGS40000136669 TC4671365.2s Page A-20 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported USGS-CA Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 21 Site ID: 083002207T East Groundwater Flow: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 69447 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: Higher Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 12 ft Date: 09/29/1993 E22 USGS-CA South Formal name: 1/2 - 1 Mile Monloc Identifier: Higher Objectid: 21931 Latitude: 33.6793 Longitude: -117.8807 Site code: 336793N1178807W001 State well numbe: 06S10W01 L001 S Local well name: " Well use id: 6 Well use descrip: Unknown County id: 30 County name: Orange Basin code: 18-1' Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County Dwr region id: 80238 Dwr region: Southern Region Office Site id: CADW60000021931 F23 NNW 1/2 -11 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-CA Formal name: USGS California Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-334213117530801 Monloc name: 005S010W26RO02S Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 18070204 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -117.8864456 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Level or other surveying method Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode Aquifername: California Coastal Basin aquifers Formation type: Not Reported CA WELLS CADW60000021931 FED USGS USGS40000137065 Not Reported Not Reported 33.7036299 24000 seconds 37.20 .10 TC4671365.2s Page A-21 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported 083000637T SSW Construction date: 19500901 Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: 120 Wellholedepth units: ft 25.27 Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 62 01/1987 G25 Feet below Feet to NE Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- 1986-03-03 Deep Water Depth: ------------------------------------------------- Note: The well was destroyed (no water level is recorded). 5.03 1985-11-04 9.58 04/15/1999 1985-08-07 8.88 1985-05-08 7.74 1985-02-14 7.44 1984-10-25 8.60 1984-08-14 8.36 1984-05-10 7.07 1984-02-15 6.43 1983-11-01 8.47 1983-08-10 8.93 1983-05-12 7.36 1983-02-09 8.19 1982-11-09 10.58 1982-08-04 10.49 1982-05-06 9.10 1982-01-29 8.53 1981-11-05 11.00 1981-07-30 10.71 1981-05-15 9.51 1981-02-09 10.70 1980-11-03 12.29 1980-08-27 11.79 1980-06-18 10.97 1980-02-12 13.73 1979-11-08 14.20 1979-08-06 14.90 1979-05-02 12.28 1979-02-05 12.18 1978-11-06 15.65 1978-09-26 15.80 1977-10-26 19.30 1977-03-07 20.10 1976-05-11 16.30 1976-01-12 13.30 1975-01-09 14.50 1974-10-23 15.90 1974-09-06 16.40 1974-05-06 13.00 1974-03-21 12.00 1973-11-05 14.50 1973-09-13 16.30 1973-07-10 14.70 1973-05-11 12.30 1973-03-13 8.00 1973-01-11 11.70 1972-11-06 14.40 1972-09-08 14.10 1972-07-12 14.40 1972-05-05 11.30 1972-03-03 9.80 1972-01-13 13.40 1971-11-08 12.20 1971-09-02 12.40 1971-07-16 13.00 1971-06-17 8.90 1971-05-06 8.00 1971-04-16 7.00 1971-03-08 7.10 1970-11-05 9.20 1970-10-08 8.50 1970-08-12 8.60 24 Site ID: 083000637T SSW Groundwater Flow: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 66542 1/2 -11 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 25.27 Date: 01/1987 G25 Site ID: 083001285T NE Groundwater Flow: SW AQUIFLOW 51997 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 5.03 Date: 04/15/1999 TC4671365.2s Page A-22 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation F26 Site ID: NNW NE 1/2 - 1 Mile NW Higher Shallow Water Depth: Objectid: 9606 Latitude: 33.7036 Longitude: -117.8874 Site code: 337036N1178874W001 State well numbe: 05S10W26R002S Local well name: " Well use id: 6 Well use descrip: Unknown County id: 30 County name: Orange Basin code: '8-1' Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County Dwr region id: 80238 Dwr region: Southern Region Office Site id: CADW60000009606 G27 Site ID: 083001918T NE Groundwater Flow: NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 5.4 Higher Average Water Depth Deep Water Depth: 9.68 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 12/1994 H28 Site ID: East Groundwater Flow: 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: Higher Deep Water Depth: Average Water Depth Date: H29 Site ID: East Groundwater Flow: 1/2 - 1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: Higher Deep Water Depth: Average Water Depth Date: 30 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Objectid: Latitude: Longitude: Site code: State well numbe: Local well name: Well use id: Well use descrip: County id: County name: 083002269T Not Reported loft 14 ft Not Reported 12/08/1993 083002269T Not Reported loft 14 ft Not Reported 12/08/1993 21177 33.6965 -117.8644 336965N1178644W001 05S09W31 E004S 116 Unknown 30 Orange Database EDR ID Number CA WELLS CADW60000009606 AQUIFLOW 68312 AQUIFLOW 50938 AQUIFLOW 50937 CA WELLS CADW60000021177 TC4671365.2s Page A-23 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Basin code: '8-1' Basin desc: Coastal Plain Of Orange County Dwr region id: 80238 Dwr region: Southern Region Office Site id: CADW60000021177 31 Site ID: 083000135T South Groundwater Flow: NNE AQUIFLOW 64529 1/2-1 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 26 Date: 02/22/1995 32 Site ID: 083001627T SW Groundwater Flow: SW AQUIFLOW 34037 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Shallow Water Depth: 26.10 Deep Water Depth: 26.45 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: 04/22/1996 TC4671365.2s Page A-24 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Database EDR ID Number 1 Sw SSE 1/2 -1 Mile OIL—GAS CAOG11000217945 1/2 - 1 Mile District nun: 1 Api number: District nun: 1 Api number: 05901162 Blm well: N Redrill can: Not Reported Dryhole: y Well status: P Operator name: Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Township: 06S County name: Orange Fieldname: Any Field Area name: Any Area Section: 1 Township: 06S Range: 10W Base meridian: SB Elevation: Not Reported Locationde: Not Reported Hydraulica: Confidenti: Gissourcec: hud Welldeptha: 0 Comments: Not Reported 0 Leasename: Irvine Wellnumber: 1 Epawell: N Hydraulica: N Confidenti: N Spuddate: Not Reported Welldeptha: 0 Redrillfoo: 0 Abandonedd: Not Reported Completion: Not Reported Directiona: Unknown Gissymbol: PDH Site id: CAOG11000217945 2 Sw 1/2 -1 Mile District nun: 1 Api number: Blm well: N Redrill can: Dryhole: y Well status: Operator name: Occidental Petroleum Corporation County name: Orange Fieldname: Area name: Any Area Section: Township: 06S Range: Base meridian: SB Elevation: Locationde: Not Reported Gissourcec: hud Comments: Not Reported Leasename: Wallace C.H. Wellnumber: Epawell: N Hydraulica: Confidenti: N Spuddate: Welldeptha: 0 Redrillfoo: 0 Abandonedd: Not Reported Completion: Directiona: Unknown Gissymbol: Site id: CAOG11000222240 OIL—GAS CAOG11000222240 05920355 Not Reported P Any Field 2 10W Not Reported 1 N Not Reported Not Reported PDH TC4671365.2s Page A-25 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database: CA Radon Radon Test Results Zipcode Num Tests 92626 70 > 4 pCi/L 5 Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for ORANGE COUNTY, CA Number of sites tested: 30 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L Living Area - 1st Floor 0.763 pCi/L 100% Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L 0% 0% Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported TC4671365.2s Page A-26 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4671365.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC4671365.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California's Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4671365.2s Page PSGR-3 APPENDIX D TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS/QUEUEING ANALYSIS Stantec August 3, 2016 File: 2073008840 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 38 Technology Drive Suite 100, Irvine CA 92618-5312 Attention: Ken Farrell, Assoc. AIA, LEED AP BD+C Arquitectonica 818 W. 7th Street, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Dear Mr. Farrell, Reference: 3350 Avenue of the Arts/Starwood Hotel Project Trip Generation Analysis and Driveway and Valet Service Queueing Analysis Summary The Starwood Hotel is located at 3350 Avenue of the Arts in the City of Costa Mesa. In 2007, the City of Costa Mesa approved a project to add 120 condominiums, 3,450 square feet of lounge/bar space, and 1,740 square feet of ancillary retail space to the existing hotel, and a remodeling of the hotel with a net reduction of 38 rooms (reduced from 238 rooms to 200 rooms). Currently the project applicant is proposing the expansion of the hotel use by 150 hotel rooms without the addition of condominium units resulting in a total of 388 rooms (existing 238 rooms plus 150 rooms). Trip Generation Analysis An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Traffic Study were prepared for the approved project in 2007. The Traffic Study analyzed project impacts at 15 local intersections under short-range and long-range conditions, and found that the approved project had no significant impact on the surrounding circulation system. The approved and entitled development, before the reduction of 38 hotel rooms, would generate a total of 1,191 daily trips. For purposes of this analysis, the approved use's daily trips (1,191) were converted to equivalent hotel rooms using an average daily traffic (ADT) trip rate for the hotel (6.66) derived by the City of Costa Mesa using ITE Trip Generation Manual rates as the basis and refined based on traffic counts of the current hotel's driveways, resulting in 179 equivalent hotel rooms. After discounting the 38 hotel rooms that would have been removed as part of the approved project (discussed above), the equivalent approved rooms would be 141. The currently proposed project would expand the hotel by 150 hotel rooms, resulting in a net increase of 9 hotel rooms and 60 daily trips. Table 1 (attached) summarizes the trip generation calculations. TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS CONCLUSION The approved and entitled project had no significant impact on the surrounding intersections as summarized in the 2007 EIR Traffic Study. The currently proposed project would generate a Design with community in mind 1 LJ August 3, 2016 Ken Farrell, Assoc. AIA, LEED AP BD+C Page 2 of 4 Reference: 3350 Avenue of the Arts/Starwood Hotel Project Trip Generation Analysis and Driveway and Valet Service Queueing Analysis Summary negligible amount of additional daily trips (60 trips), and therefore is expected to also not have a significant impact. Driveway and Valet Service Queuing Analysis The expansion of the hotel use by 150 hotel rooms to the existing 238 -room hotel would result in a total of 388 hotel rooms. The following summarizes the results of a queuing analysis for the 388 - room hotel and focuses on the queuing at the driveway of the hotel, taking into consideration the driveway vehicle demand, the available queue storage, hotel valet services and the valet drive ramp from the garage. Visitors of the hotel would have an option to valet their vehicle or self -park. Those accessing the self -park facility would continue on Avenue of the Arts, pass the hotel driveway, turn right at the traffic circle, and access the parking structure entry in rear of the hotel. Those that utilize the valet service would use the driveway from Avenue of the Arts. A queue is formed when arrivals wait at the valet station for service. Therefore, this analysis uses a 5 -minute vehicle demand during the highest peak hour (highest of AM and PM peak hour) at the hotel driveway to estimate the arrival rate of vehicles and the adequate service rate needed for the valet to process the vehicles in order to accommodate the demand. The valet station and guest drop-off is located in front of the hotel lobby. After processing the vehicle (i.e., valet provides a ticket to the guest) the valet would drive the vehicle out of the driveway, make a right onto Avenue of the Arts, turn right at the traffic circle and access the valet parking through the parking structure entry in the rear of the hotel. For pick-up service, the valet would utilize the "valet exit only" ramp located inside the parking structure. The ramp provides a direct connection from the valet parking inside the structure to the front of the hotel driveway. The following assumptions were made for this analysis (See attachments for Tables): - 233 vehicles (total inbound/outbound) utilize the hotel driveway during the PM peak hour - 75% would use valet and 25% would use self -park - Based on the two assumptions above, the arrival rate would be 15 vehicles per 5 minutes (i.e., the amount of vehicles using the valet service) - Arrivals distributed as a Poisson or random arrival pattern - Method of service is first come first served - Based on the most current site plan, the queue length is finite (12 vehicles) - Service rate (i.e., how long it takes valet to process a vehicle) ranges from 15 seconds per vehicle to 30 seconds per vehicle 1 LJ August 3, 2016 Ken Farrell, Assoc. AIA, LEED AP BD+C Page 3 of 4 Reference: 3350 Avenue of the Arts/Starwood Hotel Project Trip Generation Analysis and Driveway and Valet Service Queueing Analysis Summary - Single -channel is available to process the vehicles (i.e., one line). - The number of valet would be determined by the hotel based on the type of events on any given day. For this analysis, 2 valets would need to process vehicles (i.e., provide ticket and drive car only) at any given time in the pick-up/drop-off zone. The assumptions listed above were utilized as inputs for the queuing analysis. Queuing formulas obtained from the Traffic and Highway Engineering Handbook (Garber & Hoel, 1988) were used to calculate the traffic intensity, the expected number of vehicles in the driveway, the expected number of vehicles waiting to be served and the probability of the hotel driveway being full (i.e., 12 vehicles). The formulas used for this analysis were for Single -Channel, Undersaturated, and Finite Queues. QUEUING ANALYSIS CONCLUSION Based on the assumption listed above, the following conclusions are made: - The service rate (i.e., valet processing time) can vary based on the demand. For this analysis, the adequate service rate for a valet to process a vehicle is 30 seconds per vehicle. - Based on an arrival rate of 15 vehicles per 5 minutes during the highest peak hour, the expected number of vehicles in the driveway is 3 vehicles with a mean queue length of 2 vehicles (i.e., 1 car being served and 2 cars waiting to be served). - Based on the current site plan, the driveway allows for queue storage of 12 vehicles. The probability the queuing area will be full (i.e., 12 vehicles) within a peak 5 minute window is 6%. In summary, under typical conditions the proposed driveway and valet layout would be adequate with a minimum of two valets at the valet station at any given time to process valet customers. Note that the total number of valets on duty will depend on the time needed to move the vehicles to and from the parking structure such that a minimum of two valets are processing customers at the valet station at any given time. For special events, valet staffing will be determined by the hotel based on the anticipated demand. u1 August 3, 2016 Ken Farrell, Assoc. AIA, LEED AP BD+C Page 4 of 4 Reference: 3350 Avenue of the Arts/Starwood Hotel Project Trip Generation Analysis and Driveway and Valet Service Queueing Analysis Summary Sincerely, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. �A Maria Manalili, AICP, PTP Senior Transportation Planner Phone: (949) 923-6072 Maria.Manalili@stantec.com Attachment: Table 1 Starwood Hotel Expansion Project — Trip Generation Summary Table 2 Starwood Hotel Driveway/Valet Service Queuing Analysis Summary2 Table 3 Starwood Hotel - Peak Hour Driveway Trips Table 4 Starwood Hotel - Valet Service Utilization during the Peak Hour cc. Daryl Zerfass, Stantec Cathy Lawrence, Stantec cal v:\2073\active\2073010830\correspondence\letters\let_starwood_trip_queue_summary-20160801_redline.docx Design with community in mind Li ,•, 010 00, • •. ♦, • "b doo 00 i PROPOSED ' CROSSWALK I J -000000000 GUEST OUTBOUND --------------Y----------� '• EXTERIOR COURTYARD SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS = � � m GUEST INBOUND •••••••• GUEST OUTBOUND ---� VALET ROUTE TO PARKING VALET CAR RETURN FIRE LANE i nnninir NEW OR EXISTING LOADING N Q) IF] r� I 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' AROU/TECTON/CA AVENUE OF THE ARTS HOTEL EXPANSION VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN A2.00 818 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 800 3350 AVENUE OF THE ARTS COSTA MESA, CA 92626 Scale 1/16" = 1'-0" LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 TEL: 213.895.7800 FAX: 213.895.7808 Project No: 3317 Issue Date: JUNE 3, 2016 No copies, transmission, reproductions or electronic manipulation of any portion of these drawings in whole or in part are to be made without the express written permission of ARQUITECTONICA International. All designs indicated in these drawings are property of ARQUITECTONICA International. All copyrights reserved (c) 2016 Table 1 Starwood Hotel Expansion Project - Trip Generation Summary Land Use Units ADT 2007 Project -Approved Condo 120 DU 806 Retail 1.74 TSF 75 —Bar/Lounge 3.45 TSF 310 Total 1,191 Hotel Rooms' (Equivalent) 179 Room -Approved Approved 2007 Project - Hotel Room Reduction -38 Room Total Approved Rooms (Equivalent) 141 Room Hotel Expansion 150 Room -Proposed Net Change - Proposed vs. Approved 9 Room 60 Rate -Trip Hotel 2 Room 6.66 Total Approved 2007 EIR Traffic Study ADT divide by hotel ADT rate (1,191 /6.66) 2 Source: City of Costa Mesa—derived based on ITE Trip Generation Manual data and driveway counts of existing hotel. Design with community in mind Table 2 Starwood Hotel Driveway/Valet Service Queuing Analysis Summary Design with community in mind Mean Expected Queue Valet Traffic Probability Number of Length ProcessingService Arrival Intensity' of a full Vehicles in (Expected Number of Time Rate Rate (Arrival Rate/ Under/Over Driveway the Cars Waiting to sec/veh) (veh/5 min) (veh/5 min Service Rate saturated 12 vehicles ' Driveway, be Served ' 1 person processin vehicles 15 20 15 0.75 Under 6% 3 2 30 10 15 1.50 Over na na na 2 people processin vehicles 15 40 15 0.38 Under 0% 1 0 20 30 15 0.50 Under 0% 1 1 25 24 15 0.63 Under 1 % 2 1 30 20 15 0.75 Under 6% 3 2 40 15 15 1.00 Over na na na 3 people processing vehicles 15 60 15 0.25 Under 0% 0 0 20 45 15 0.33 Under 0% 0 0 25 36 15 0.42 Under 0% 1 0 30 30 15 0.50 Under 0% 1 1 40 23 15 0.65 Under 1% 2 1 Notes: Valet Processing Time - The amount of time (seconds) needed for valet to provide a ticket and drive car for pick-up or drop-off. Service Rate - The number of vehicles that the valet would be able to process in 5 minutes given the processing time. Arrival Rate - The number of vehicles requiring valet service for drop-off/pick-up service in a 5 minute window during the highest peak hour. Traffic Intensity - Is calculated by taking the arrival rate and dividing it by the service rate. Queuing is of no significance when traffic intensity is less than 0.5, but at values of 0.75 and above, the average queue lengths tend to increase rapidly. Under/Oversaturated - As the ratio of the rate of arrival to rate of service tend to 1, it approaches saturation. Oversaturated queues are those in which the arrival rate is higher than the service rate. The length of an oversaturate queue will never reach a steady state but will continue to increase with the arrival of units. ' Calculations are based on formulas from "Introduction to Queuing Theory: Single -Channel, Undersaturated, Finite Queues," Traffic and Highway Engineering, 1988. Design with community in mind Table 3 Starwood Hotel - Peak Hour Driveway Trips Table 4 Starwood Hotel — Valet Service Utilization during the Peak Hour Peak Hour Total Inbound + Outbound 75% of Vehicles using Valet veh/hour) Peak Hour Land Use Amount Unit In Out Total Hotel Trip Rates 388 Rooms 0.31 0.29 0.60 Trip generation 120 113 233 Calculated trip generation is used for this analysis only. The PM peak hour is the highest peak hour. Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook 9th Edition for Hotel 310 Land Use Category Table 4 Starwood Hotel — Valet Service Utilization during the Peak Hour Peak Hour Total Inbound + Outbound 75% of Vehicles using Valet veh/hour) (veh/15 min) (veh/5 min 233 175 44 15 A conservative 75%/25% split was used to estimate number of vehicles using valet versus self -park. Design with community in mind