HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-12 Rezone, 375 Bristol St.ORDINANCE NO. 16-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
FOR REZONE R-15-01 TO REZONE (OR CHANGE) A 3.18 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 375
BRISTOL STREET FROM PDC (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL) TO C2
(GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) FOR A SELF -STORAGE FACILITY AND RETAIL
BUILDING AT 375 BRISTOL STREET
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, an application was filed by Annette Wiley, representing the property
owner, Sanderson J. Ray Development, requesting approval of the following:
• Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND).
• Rezone R-15-01: An ordinance to rezone a 3.18 -acre site from PDC (Planned
Development Commercial) to C2 (General Business District).
• Planning Application PA -15-30: Conditional Use Permit PA -15-30 for the partial
demolition of the existing automotive center (Bristol Autoplex) and the development of a
mini -storage facility and to retain 12,500 square feet of the existing retail building. No
code deviations are requested.
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on
October 10, 2016 with all persons having the opportunity to speak and be heard for and
against the proposal.
WHEREAS, on October 10, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended the
following actions:
1. Approve the Initial Study/Negative Declaration;
2. Give first reading to Ordinance 16-xx for R-15-01 to rezone (or change) a 3.18 -acre
site located at 375 Bristol Street from PDC (Planned Development Commercial) to C2
(General Business District); and
3. Approve Planning Application PA -15-30 by adopting a resolution to approve the
project, subject to conditions of approval.
WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on November
1, 2016.
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all environmental documents comprising
the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and has found that the Initial Study/Mitigated
Ordinance No. 16-12 Page 1 of 7
Negative Declaration considers all environmental impacts of the proposed project and a
reasonable range of alternatives, and the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration is
complete, adequate, and fully complies with all requirements of CEQA, the CEQA
Guidelines, and the City of Costa Mesa Environmental Guidelines. In accordance with CEQA
Guidelines Section 15073, the IS/MND was originally made available for a 30 -day public
review and comment period from May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016.
WHEREAS, the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project reflects the
independent judgment of the City of Costa Mesa.
SECTION 1: REZONE. The City of Costa Mesa Official Zoning Map is hereby amended as
follows:
1. There is hereby placed and included in the C2 (General Business District) zoning
district a 3.18 -acre parcel, identified as County Assessor Parcel Number 119-200-33
and as shown in attached Exhibit B, situated in the City of Costa Mesa, County of
Orange, State of California.
2. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 13-22 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, the
Official Zoning Map of the City of Costa Mesa is hereby amended by the change of
zone described in subsection #1 above and in respective Exhibit B. A copy of the
Official Zoning Map is on file in the office of the Planning Division.
Based on the evidence in the record and the findings contained in Exhibit A, THE CITY
COUNCIL HEREBY GRANTS APPROVAL TO ADOPT R-15-01, which amends the Zoning
Map of the City of Costa Mesa (Exhibit B) with respect to the property described above.
SECTION 2: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the
IS/MND was originally made available for a 30 -day public review and comment period from
May 14, 2016 to June 12, 2016. The IS/MND for this project reflects the independent
judgment of the City of Costa Mesa.
SECTION 3: INCONSISTENCIES. Any provision of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code or
appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance, to the extent of such
inconsistencies and or further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to affect
the provisions of this ordinance.
Ordinance No. 16-12 Page 2 of 7
SECTION 4: SEVERABILITY. If any provision or clause of this ordinance or the application
thereof to any person or circumstances is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by
any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or clauses
or applications of this ordinance which can be implemented without the invalid provision,
clause or application; and to this end, the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be
severable.
SECTION 5: PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30)
days from and after the passage thereof, and prior to the expiration of fifteen (15) days from its
passage shall be published once in the ORANGE COAST DAILY PILOT, a newspaper of
general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa or, in the alternative, the
City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the
text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk five (5) days prior to the
date of adoption of this Ordinance, and within fifteen (15) days after adoption, the City Clerk
shall cause to be published the aforementioned summary and shall post in the office of the City
Clerk a certified copy of this Ordinance together with the names and member of the City
Council voting for and against the same.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2016.
C/
Stephe M Mensinger, Mayor
1=D AS TO FORM:
mag' Duarte, City Attorney
►_11011:01111
Brenda Green, Oty Clerk
Ordinance No. 16-12 Page 3 of 7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF COSTA MESA )
I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, hereby certify that the
above foregoing Ordinance No. 16-12 as introduced and considered section by section at a
regular meeting of said City Council held on the list day of November, 2016, and thereafter
passed and adopted as a whole at the regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th
day of November, 2016, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: FOLEY, GENIS, RIGHEIMER AND MENSINGER
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: MONAHAN
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City
of Costa Mesa this 16th day of November, 2016.
Brenda Green, tity Clerk
Ordinance No. 16-12 Page 4 of 7
EXHIBIT A
FINDINGS
A. Required Finding: The proposed rezone is consistent with the Zoning Code and
the General Plan.
Facts In Support of Findings: The proposed project meets or exceeds the
intent of the City's Zoning Code with regard to the development standards for
the C2 zone, including lot size, building setbacks, building height, and onsite
parking. The General Plan land use designation for the project area is
General Commercial, which is compatible with the proposed zone change to
C2 (General Business District).
The following describes the proposed project's consistency with specific goals and
objectives of the General Plan, Land Use Element.
• Goal LU -1: Land Use: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to provide its
citizens with a balanced community of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, and institutional uses to satisfy the needs of the social and
economic segments of the population and to retain the residential character of
the City; to meet the competing demands for alternative developments within
each land use classification within reasonable land use intensity limits; and, to
ensure the long-term viability and productivity of the community's natural and
man-made environments.
Consistency: The project would provide a self -storage facility under the title
and design features of a "mini -warehouse" with a freestanding food court
building that is designated for general commercial uses. The project would
add to the commercial character of the community and meet the competing
demands for alternative development. Therefore, the project is consistent with
this General Plan goal.
• Objective LU -113: Ensure the long-term productivity and viability of the
community's economic base.
Consistency: The project would develop a profitable self -storage facility and
food court building and would provide local employment opportunities. The
proposed project would strengthen the City's economic base. Therefore, the
project is consistent with this General Plan objective.
• Goal LU -2: Development: It is the goal of the City of Costa Mesa to establish
development policies that will create and maintain an aesthetically pleasing
and functional environment and minimize impacts on existing physical and
social resources.
Consistency: The project would redevelop the property with a self -storage
facility and a food court building. The project would enhance the site's visual
Ordinance No. 16-12 Page 5 of 7
appearance through the use of landscaping to soften the visual impact of the
storage facility. The proposed project would include the use of materials and
colors that create visual interest as outlined in City policies related to
aesthetics. The project's design would reflect that of similar project recently
constructed in the area. Therefore, the project is consistent with this General
Plan goal.
• Objective LU -2A: Encourage new development and redevelopment to
improve and maintain the quality of the environment.
Consistency: The proposed project includes the redevelopment of a site that
currently has an automotive mall. Implementation of the proposed project
would reduce stormwater runoff by improving on-site hydrology. The building
would be designed with energy saving components including solar panels and
low-energy lighting.
B. The project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental
procedures. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been
prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). If any of these conditions are removed, the decision-making body must
make a finding that the project will not result in significant environmental impacts,
that the conditions are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public
agency, or that specific economic, social or other considerations make the mitigation
measures infeasible.
Ordinance No. 16-12 Page 6 of 7
EXHIBIT B
Amendment to the Zoning Map
Change the zoning district of the 3.18 -acre development site at 375 Bristol Street from
Planned Development Commercial (PDC) to General Business District (C2)
I
ICIXJ32 NIT 0 147ft
Ordinance No. 16-12 Page 7 of 7