HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/01/1976 - Adjourned City Council MeetingADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF COSTA MESA
May 1, 1976
The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa met in
adjourned regular session at 8:00 a.m., May 1, 1976,
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 77 "Fair Drive,
Costa Mesa, California, said meeting having been
duly and regularly ordered adjourned from the
adjourned regular meeting of April 20, 1976, and a
copy of the Notice of Adjournment having been
posted as required by"law.
Roll Call Council Members Present: Raciti, Hammett, Hertzog,
McFarland, Smallwood
Council Members Absent: None
1
1
1
Officials Present: City Manager, Assistant
City Manager, Assistant
City Attorney, Director
-of-:-Planning, Director of
Finance, Director of
Public Services/City
Engineer, Director of
Building Safety, Director
of Leisure Services, Fire
Chief, Police Chief,
Director of Personnel,
and City Clerk
Adjournment
On motion by Vice Mayor Hammett, seconded by Council -
to Conference
woman Smallwood, and carried, the meeting was
Room
adjourned at 8:05 a.m. to the first floor Conference
Room.
Appointment
The Mayor presented names for appointment to a
of Water
Citizens Committee whose purpose shall be to compile
Committee
and study information pertaining to a possible
consolidation of the Water District to the City of
---Costa Mesa. Said committee shall report its findings
to -_the Council. On motion by Councilwoman Hertzog,
seconded by Councilman McFarland, and carried, the
following persons were appointed to the Water Commit-
tee:,' Tom"Nelson, Faye Wilson, Louise Napoli, Paul
Raver, Al Painter, Ralph Burgess, Neil Abrams, Russ
Gilbert, Don Tompkins, Ken Wayman, and Elsie
Koresche.
Agenda
The City Manager deleted Item 41, Policy Statement -
Deletion
.:-Badges, from the Agenda, and added an additional item
and
concerning the Orange County Fairgrounds. A brief
Addition
discussion followed to establish the priority of the
43 Agenda items to be discussed.
Federal
The City Manager led a discussion on allocation of
Revenue
Federal Revenue Sharing Funds, outlining those
Sharing
projects for which funds have already been committed,
Funds
and indicated those projects which will be recom-
mended to the Council for funding in the near future.
Ongoing projects will include continuance of the
street maintenance program; and Phase II of the
downtown fire station. Further discussion was held
concerning what percentage of_funds should be allo-
cated to social programs within the City. It was e
suggested that previous policy be continued by
1
1
1
accepting applications from those organizations
seeking assistance from Revenue Sharing. On motion
by Vice Mayor Hammett, seconded by Councilwoman
Hertzog, the City Manager was authorized to set
aside an amount representing ten percent of the
available Revenue Sharing Funds for social programs,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members: Raciti, Hammett,
Hertzog, McFarland,
Smallwood
NOES: Council Members: None
ABSENT: Council Members: None
Planning
Discussion was held concerning the area of responsibil-
Commission
ity of the Planning Commission. Councilman McFarland
Area.of
expressed his desire to review the report that was made
Responsibility
on this subject.approximately one year ago, with the
idea of updating and more clearly defining the Planning
Commission's role in decision-making. It was suggested
that the Commission could have greater authority in the
area of planning, variances, etc. Vice Mayor Hammett
expressed great interest in having the planning densi-
ties more clearly defined together with justification
in support of the definitions. The Council also
addressed the subject of placing the CP designation on
all"zones. Vice Mayor Hammett felt many properties in
the City could not be developed without acquiring
variances, and at this time the Council would have the
opportunity to require the CP standards. The Planning
Director recommended a review of the zoning and land
Development
use, and that development standards, which are neces-
Standards
sary and desirable, be incorporated into the Land Use
Ordinance. At the conclusion of this discussion, a
motion was made by Vice Mayor Hammett, seconded by
Councilman McFarland, and carried, that a Study
Session with the Planning Commission be scheduled as
an adjourned Council meeting, to take place at the
earliest possible date. As part of the motion, the
Planning Commission was directed to commence a review
with the staff.of the zoning definitions, the prob-
lems commensurate with the application of zoning, and
the merits of.incorporating the CP standards into
ordinance form.
It was felt that Items 21 and 22 concerning Land Use
Study - Fairview Road to Sunflower Avenue to'Main
Street to Baker Street; and Evaluation of Land Use -
General Plan 1970, had been covered in the preceding '
discussion and could be a part of the aforementioned
meeting with the Planning Commission.
Civic Center The next item concerning the Civic Center Study was
Study discussed along with Items 13 and 14 concerning City -
owned properties; and the old City Hall building. It
was suggested that two properties adjacent to the
Civic Center, and identified for these purposes as the
Water. District property and the Buccola property,
should be incorporated for consideration in the Civic
Center District Study. These two properties are now
available for sale and the merits of acquisition by
the City were briefly discussed. The City Manager
expressed some concern that priorities in the area of
property acquisition by the City be established in
light of the fact that other purchases are presently
being considered. A brief discussion was held con-
cerning the possible sale of the old City Hall
building with the idea of diverting the proceeds to
other,acquisitions. Concerning the sale of the Water
District property., Councilfeltthat this could be
more adequately addressed at a future date when the
Water Consolidation Study is completed. The City
Manager indicated he would make contact with the
Water District Manager to ascertain if the sale of
this property could be delayed. At the conclusion
of discussion, a motion was made by Vice Mayor
Hammett, seconded by Councilwoman Smallwood, and
carried, that the Civic Center Study be reinstituted
and reviewed with a report back to the Council in 90
days.
Recess The Mayor declared a recess at 10:05 a.m.,and the
meeting reconvened at 10:20 a.m.
Fairgrounds Councilman McFarland requested a meeting be scheduled
with Jim Porterfield and other representatives of the
Fair Board to discuss various items of common interest
including the Master Plan of Development for the Fair-
grounds, licensing of business activities, and zoning
matters related to the Civic Center. It was also
suggested that the Planning Commission be present at
this meeting.
1
Traffic
Councilwoman Smallwood expressed her concern that.
Circulation -
traffic circulation.is a very serious problem in the
Scheduled
City and should be addressed, particularly in the
Projects
downtown area, before the redevelopment plans move
ahead. Councilwoman Smallwood feels that many
projects are being approved without proper consider-
ation to the total affect on traffic circulation
throughout the City. The Director of Public Services
discussed some of the traffic problem areas in the
City and identified projects which are planned, or in
progress, to alleviate these situations, including
the Del Mar Avenue widening, the 19th Street widening
between Park and Fullerton Avenues, and the widening
of Victoria Street from the Santa Ara River to Canyon
Drive. During the discussion which followed, Council
addressed the apparent halting of Costa Mesa's free-
way plans and what impact this may have on the
downtown traffic problems with particular emphasis on
the redevelopment. On motion by Vice Mayor Hammett,
seconded by Councilman McFarland, and carried, it was
recommended to the Redevelopment Agency that the
redevelopment plans be reconsidered and -expanded in
regard to circulation, and that new recommendations
be formulated taking into consideration the possible J
elimination of the freeway.
Recess
The Mayor declared a recess at 12:00 noon and the'
meeting reconvened at 1:00 p.m.
Hydrant
Russ Henderson, Fire Protection Analyst for the City,
Distribution
gave a presentation dealing with the deficiencies
Center
relative to fire hydrants and water mains throughout
.the City. The cost to correct these deficiencies is
estimated at $3,532,000.00. The allocation of costs
has been addressed by the Fire Department and the
recommendation is to assess by fee method based upon
front footage and fire potential. Additionally, it
is recommended that the City adopt a fire flow ordi-
nance. This would establish the maximum allowable
fire flow and limit the fire flow to local water
main capabilities. At the conclusion of this discus-
sion, the staff was authorized to prepare the proposed
ordinance.
South Coast.
Councilwoman Hertzog suggested that a portion of the
Repertory
City's'bed tax revenues be allocated on a continuing
basis, in support of'the South Coast Repertory Company.
Since these revenues are generally derived from
sources outside of the City, it was felt that support
of the theatre by this means would be more widely
acceptable. After discussion, Council Members Hertzog
and McFarland were appointed to meet with representa-
tives of the South Coast Repertory Company to discuss
this proposal further.
Priorities on
Items Returned
Councilwoman Hertzog expressedconcern that in cases
where items of business are returned by the Council
to Planning
to the Planning Commission for further review, these
Commission
items are not being processed through the normal
procedures which would permit notification of inter-
ested parties. During the discussion which followed,
it was agreed by the Council that individuals should
be given every opportunity to be heard on items of
concern to them. The City Manager recommended, and
the Council concurred, that all items returned to the
Planning Commission follow the normal procedures for
scheduling on the Agenda, and this would then include
the notification procedures.
Council Councilwoman Hertzog expressed her concern that
Discussions discussions with staff concerning City Business are
with Staff sometimes misinterpreted as criticisms or directions
Regarding for change. She would like to establish communica-
City Business tion with the staff whereby requests for information
or research and/or the relationship of the request to
the existing work load. The City Manager indicated
he would like to investigate this matter further.
"Super Block"
Bill Dunn, Assistant City Manager/Community Develop -
went, presented a report on property acquisition for
the "Super Block" and the status of negotiations at
this time. For the benefit of new Council Members,
Mr. Dunn explained that the "Super Block" concept
arose some two years ago when the need for a downtown
"--fire station became apparent. This concept was
expanded to include the possibility for a Child Care
Center as well as plans for expansion of the downtown
park-. It was felt that negotiations should continue
in an orderly manner without resorting to condemnation
proceedings if at all possible. At the conclusion of
this.'discussion, Councilman McFarland expressed an
interest to meet with the Redevelopment Agency to dis-
cuss the downtown redevelopment.
Sign Ordinance..,
The Assistant City Attorney presented a report on the
Enforcement
status of the new Sign Ordinance. He indicated that
an inventory of signs throughout the City has been
made. Further, that as of this date, approximately
500 sign permits have been issued under the new
ordinance, with less than 2_.5 percent of these being
issued under variance procedure. In addition to this,
approximately 40,000 square feet of signs have been
removed. It was concluded that sign enforcement
appears to be progressing in an orderly fashion with-,
out too many problems.
Senior Citizen
Councilwoman Hertzog gave a brief report on the subject
Housing -
of Senior Citizen Housing. No action was taken on this
Downtown
item.
SCAG
Discussion was held concerning Southern California
Association of Governments, its function, and possible
control over this City's activities, especially those
related to Federal programs. The City Manager indi-
cated that there are two cities in Southern California,
with a population exceeding 301-000, who are not members
of SCAG; Costa Mesa being one of them. The merits of
E -, f`drl�rle�ms
joining or not joining this associaton were discussed
at some length. At the conclusion of this discussion,
the Mayor requested the City Manager to make contact
with SCAG for the purpose of requesting a presentation
to the Council by one of their representatives.
Parks - The Director of Leisure Services discussed the criteria
Priority for for establishing priorities in park development. He
Development explained that the City has an adopted park acreage
standard of 2-1/2 acres per thousand persons, and that
the City is divided up into six park zones. The
criteria for establishing development priorities is
then based on the zone with the fewest developed park
acres per one thousand persons. The City Manager
discussed properties which are being considered for
purchase in those zones which are presently deficient
in park development. At the conclusion of this dis-
cussion, no action was taken on this item.
Opinion The question was asked by Councilman McFarland as to
Research how much use is made of the information contained in
Report the Opinion Research Report. The City Manager
(Crime) responded that this information is used by the staff
as a.guide in pinpointing needs within certain areas
of the City. Further discussion was held concerning
the value of fact-finding committees and the projects
they are assigned. In conclusion, the Police Chief
gave a brief report on the crime rates within Orange
County.
Adjournment The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m.
Mayor of the 6y o Costa Mesa
ATTEST:
&24'eezi 6i,
City Clerk of the City of Co a Mesa
1