HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/02/1982 - City Council.,g
ROLL CALL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF COSTA MESA
AUGUST 2, 1982
The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California,
met in regular session on August 2, 1982, at 6:30 p.m.,
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 77 Fair Drive,
Costa Mesa. The meeting was called to order by the
Mayor, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag,
and Invocation by the Reverend Bob Ewing, South Coast
Christian Church. _
Council Members Present: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
Council Members Absent: None
Officials Present: Assistant City Manager, City
Attorney, Development Services
Director, Assistant City
Engineer, City Clerk
MINUTES On motion by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by Councilwoman
July 19, 1982 Hertzog, and carried 5-0, the minutes of the regular
meeting of July 19, 1982, were approved as distributed
and posted.
ORDINANCES A motion was made by Councilwoman Hertzog, seconded by
Councilman Johnson, and carried 5-0, to read all ordi-
nances by title only.
Pinkleys Mayor Schafer introduced former Mayor Alvin Pinkley and
Introduced his wife, Lucy.
CONSENT CALENDAR The following item was removed from the Consent Calen-
dar: Item 5 on the Reading Folder, request from
Veterans of Foreign Wars for "Civic Responsibility
Week" proclamation.
On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council-
woman Hertzog, the remaining Consent Calendar items were
approved in one motion by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONS
On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council-
woman Hertzog, Resolution 82-62, being A RESOLUTION OF
Destruction
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
of Records for
AUTHORIZING RECORDS DESTRUCTION FOR THE ANIMAL CONTROL
Animal Control
DIVISION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, PURSUANT TO ORDI-
NANCE NO. 75-60, was adopted by the following roll call
MOTION
vote:
Resolution 82-62
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
Adopted
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COfJNGIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Display of Posters
A request has been received_from Kathy Dembowski, Pre -
in City Parks -
school Director., Har_bor'Trinity Baptist Church, 1230
Harbor Trinity
Baker Street, Costa Mesa, for -permission to display
Baptist Church
small posters in City parks._- The posters contain
information regarding the Church's preschool and day
MOTION
care center. On motion by Councilman McFarland, sec -
Request Denied
onded by Councilwoman Hertzog, and carried 5-09 the
request was denied.
1
READING FOLDER On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council-
woman Hertzog, and carried 5-0, the following Reading
Folder items were received and processed:
Claims Claims were received by the City Clerk from the
following claimants: Attorney Frank C. Wright
on behalf of Carol Nelson and George Anderson;
Commercial Union Insurance Company on behalf of
Richard Andrews; Attorney Richard D. Donald on
behalf of Tuan Ngoc Nguyen; Linda Ruth Swanson;
Emogene K. Vauter; and Nancy Waterman.
Alcoholic Beverage Alcoholic Beverage License for which parking has
Licenses been approved by the Planning Division from:
Jose Garcia and Francisco J. Soto, doing business
as Southwood Liquor, 2230 Harbor Boulevard; Pizza
Palace, Incorporated, doing business as Straw Hat
Pizza, 187 East 17th Street; Thuy Do, doing busi-
ness as Harbor Liquor, 1927 Harbor Boulevard,
Suite B; and Frank H. and Linda E. Showalter,
doing business as Sunshine Liquor, 724 West 19th
'Street.
Public Utilities Notice from Southern California Gas Company and
Commission Pacific Lighting Gas Supply Company that an
application was filed with the Public Utilities
Commission for authorization to include.purchase
gas costs relating to the Pitas Point Offshore
Project in the Purchase Gas Adjustment (PGA)
procedure.
Election Ballots Resolution from the City of Westminster urging
that all ballots and ballot materials be printed
in English only and that sample ballots be
printed in at least 10 -point type.
BUSINESS PERMITS
Notice of Intention to Appeal or Solicit for Charitable
Muscular Purpose has been received from Muscular Dystrophy Asso-
Dystrophy ciation, 1823 East 17th Street, Suite 220, Santa Ana,
soliciting funds August 1 through 30, 1982, and holding
a skate-a-thon at the Ice Capades Chalet on August 14,
MOTION 1982. On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by
Permit Approved Councilwoman Hertzog, and carried 5-0, the permit was
approved with application of Municipal Code Section
9-234J and subject .to one condition recommended by the
Revenue Division.
Dorothy Brown Notice of Intention to Appeal or Solicit for Charitable
School Purpose has been received from Dorothy Brown School,
Incorporated, 3502 South Normandie Avenue, Los Angeles,
by solicitation and collection of reuseable household
MOTION items and personal clothing through August, 1982. On
Permit Approved motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Councilwoman
Hertzog, and carried 5-0, the permit was approved for
the remainder of the 1982 calendar year as recommended
by the Revenue Division, and with application of Munici-
pal Code Section 9-234J.
Happy Jaks and
Notice of Intention to Appeal or Solicit for Charitable
Jills
Purpose has been received -from Happy Jaks and Jills,
Incorporated, Post Office Box 746, Garden Grove, by
holding,a one -day sports-a-rama at the Orange County
MOTION
Fairgrounds on August 15, 1982. On motion by Council -
Permit Approved
man McFarland, seconded by Councilwoman Hertzog, and
carried 5-0, the permit.was approved with application
of Municipal Code Section 9-234J and subject to two
conditions recommended by the Revenue Division.
REJECTED CLAIMS
On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council -
Assad
woman Hertzog, and carried 5-0, the claim of Christine
L. Assad was rejected.
Berg
On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council-
to Bein and Frost
woman Hertzog, and carried 5-0, the claim of Patrick
Dale Berg was rejected.
Buffington
On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council-
District No. 80-1
woman Hertzog, and carried .5-0, the claim of Lauraine
Buffington was rejected.
Smith
On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council-
woman Hertzog, and carried 5-0, the claim of Gregory W.
Smith was rejected.
Contract Addendum
The Director of Leisure Services has recommended that
Mohle-Perry
approval be given to an addendum to the contract with
Mohle-Perry and Associates, Incorporated, 901 East
Golf Course
Imperial Highway, Suite A, La Habra. The addendum, in
Parking Lot
an amount not to exceed $6,000.00, is for construction
supervision during the Costa Mesa Golf Course parking
MOTION
lot improvements. On motion by Councilman McFarland,
Addendum
seconded by Councilwoman Hertzog, the addendum was
Approved
approved by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:. None
Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 1, relating to the contract with Will-
Willdan Associates dan Associates, 290 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 100,
Anaheim, was presented. The change order, in the amount
Assessment of $3,500.00, is for additional engineering services in
District No. 80-1 Assessment District No. 80-1, Sunflower/MacArthur Indus-
trial Area. On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded
MOTION by Councilwoman Hertzog, the change order was approved
Change Order by the following roll call vote:
Approved AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Release of Funds
The Director of Public Services has recommended that
to Bein and Frost
retention funds, in the amount of $48,801.80 of the
current $72,494.68 retention money, be released to
Assessment
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, 1401 Quail
District No. 80-1
Street, Newport Beach, in connection with construction
of Assessment District No. 80-1, Sunflower/MacArthur
Industrial Area. On motion by Councilman McFarland,
seconded by Councilwoman Hertzog, release of a portion
of the retention funds was authorized as recommended.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Agreement - Hlubik An agreement between the City and Randolph Hlubik Asso-
ciates, 3616 Main Street, Suite 205, Riverside, was
Wimbledon Park presented. The agreement stipulates payment not to
exceed $10,700.00 for landscape architectural services
MOTION at Wimbledon Park. On motion by Councilman McFarland,
Agreement seconded by Councilwoman Hertzog, the agreement was
Approved approved, and the Mayor and Clerk were authorized to
sign on behalf of the City. The motion carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Reading Folder Item 5 on the Reading Folder was presented, a letter
Civic from Veterans of Foreign Wars, Garden Grove Post No.
Responsibility 6475, 12942 Dale Street, Garden Grove, requesting that
Week the week of September 19-25, 1982, be proclaimed as
nm
"c;ivic Responsibility Week". On motion by Vice Mayor
MOTION Hall, seconded by Councilwoman Hertzog, and carried 5-0,
Held Over this item was continued to the meeting of August 16,
1982.
OLD BUSINESS
The Clerk presented for second reading and adoption
Adoption of Various Ordinance 82-13, being AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Building Codes OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE THE 1979 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE; THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE; THE UNIFORM CODE FOR
ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS; THE UNIFORM SOLAR
ENERGY CODE; THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE INCLUDING
APPENDICES A, B, C, D, G, H, AND I; THE 1976 EDITION OF
THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE INCLUDING APPENDICES A, B,
AND C; THE 1978 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
AND THE UNIFORM WIRING CODE OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA;
AND CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS TO SAID CODES.
MOTION On motion by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by Councilman
Adoption of Johnson, and carried 5-0, second reading and adoption
Ordinance 82-13 of Ordinance 82-13 was continued to the meeting.of
Held Over August 16, 1982, in order for staff to complete legal
research.
ZE-82-37 The Clerk presented Zone Exception ZE-82-37, Sid
Fleisher/Pedicini Fleisher and Zachary Pedicini, 102 Scholz Plaza, Suite
132, Newport Beach, for modification of the condition
requiring that the appurtenant structure now supporting
the sign be removed, and that the sign be lowered to
16 feet, for property located at 2574 and 2576 Newport
Boulevard, in a C1 -CP zone.
A communication has been received from Mr. Pedicini
requesting a continuance to the meeting of October 18,
1982.
The Development Services Director referred to the
memorandum from the Planning staff dated July 29, 1982,
which recommends that the original condition be upheld
and that the necessary modifications be completed
within 30 days of Council action.
Sid Fleisher, stated he has recently been advised by
Dickerson Sign Company that removal of the structure
now supporting the sign would be quite expensive. Mr.
Fleisher also reported that there are five people he
must contact regarding this matter and he would be
unable to have them attend a Council meeting prior to
October 18, 1982.
Councilman McFarland suggested that Mr. Fleisher
investigate the cost of a conforming sign because it
might be less expensive than further modification.
Vice Mayor Hall referred to -the -memorandum from staff
which states that the applicant has the option of
applying for a new variance, and this would further
delay Council action. In view of this, Vice Mayor Hall
made a motion to continue this item to October 18,
1982, as requested by the applicant. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Johnson, and carried 4-1, Mayor
Schafer voting no.
WARRANTS
On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council -
MOTION
woman Hertzog, Warrant Resolution 1185, including
Warrant 1185
Payroll 8215, was approved by the following roll call
Approved
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council -
MOTION woman Hertzog, Warrant Resolution 1185 was approved by
Warrant 1186 the following roll call vote:
Approved AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY ATTORNEY
REPORTS
Release of Funds
to McGrew for
Assessment
District No. 80-1
MOTION
Release of Funds
Authorized
The City Attorney requested Council authorization to
release funds held by the City because of Stop Notices
having been filed by Shasta Engineering and Ayala
Boring Company against McGrew Construction Company in
connection with construction of Assessment District
No. 80-1, Sunflower/MacArthur Industrial Area. The
City Attorney reported that McGrew Construction has
submitted release bonds to the City which provide that
should any legal action arise from the release of the
monies, that the City will be defended by the surety.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by
Councilman Johnson, approving the release of money
withheld, and authorizing the Director of Finance to
immediately issue a check'in the amount of $197,681.58
to McGrew Construction Company. The motion carried by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
PUBLIC HEARING The Clerk presented the public hearing, continued from
R-82-08 the meeting of July 19, 1982, for Rezone Petition
R-82-08, Costa Mesa City Council, for permission to
rezone property located at 2910 Red Hill Avene from CL
to MP. Environmental Determination: Negative Declara-
tion.
The Development Services Director reviewed the history
of subject property which was rezoned from MP to CL in
1979 to accommodate a proposed professional office
building. On August 7, 1981, Development Review
DR -81-16, for a two-story office building was approved.
Since the project has not proceeded, and the permit
will expire August 7, 1982, indications are that the
project has been abandoned, however, the property owner
has stated to the Planning Commission that he still
intends to construct the office building.
Thomas Kamph, 16901 Roundhill drive, Huntington Beach,
owner of subject property, assured the Council that he
intended to proceed with the project as promised a few
years back and explained that the project has been
delayed awaiting settlement of his father's estate.
Mr. Kamph stated he will file for an extension of
DR -81-16.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
After discussion, the Mayor reopened the public hearing.
MOTION Vice Mayor Hall made a motion to continue this item to
Held Over the meeting of August 1, 1983. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Johnson, and carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARING The Clerk announced that this was the time and place
Appeal of set for the public hearing for a rehearing requested by
Condemnation Gary Conwell, 1507 Serenade Terrace, Corona del Mar,
at 346 Ogle concerning Resolution of Necessity No. 82-59 adopted
Street/Conwell July 6, 1982, to condemn property measuring 5 feet by
60 feet, for acquisition of right-of-way for an alley
miiey Project project south of 17th Street between Santa Ana and
South of 17th Tustin Avenues; Graham Parcel No. 7, located at 346 Ogle
Street Street. The Affidavit of Publication is on file in the
Clerk's office. No communications have been received.
Gary Conwell was present and expressed his objection to
the alley improvement citing safety problems if the lot
line is too close to the alley. He further stated that
the Building Code requires a 25 -foot setback.
The Assistant City Engineer responded that since the
existing structure is now only approximately five feet
from the property line, acquisition would not greatly
alter the present setback. The -Engineer also reported
that the structure was probably constructed prior to
the property being annexed to the City.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
MOTION
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by Coun-
Adoption of
cilman McFarland, to uphold the adoption of Resolution
Resolution 82-59
82-59, based on the findings stated on July 6, 1982.
Upheld
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer .
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
PUBLIC HEARING
The Clerk announced the public hearing to consider an
Appeal of ZE-82-95/
appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Zone
RA -82-09
Exception ZE-82-95, and the Redevelopment Agency's
Smith/Darrow
denial of Redevelopment Action RA -82-09, from Betty J.
Smith, authorized agent for Daniel D. Darrow, 1733
Douglas Road, Anaheim, for a Conditional Use Permit to
legalize a nonconforming adult entertainment business
(massage studio), with variances from parking and
locational provisions, for property located at 1733
Fullerton Avenue, in a CL zone. Environmental Deter-
mination: Exempt. The Affidavit of Mailing is on file
in the Clerk's office. A communication has been
received from Doris and Norman Haid, 170 Cabrillo
Street, Costa Mesa, opposing a massage parlor in this
area.
The Development Services Director stated that since
the Council already has heard this item at the last
Redevelopment Agency meeting, he would not elaborate
on the memorandum prepared by the Planning staff
dated July 28, 1982. Staff recommended that Council
uphold Planning Commission and Redevelopment Agency
denials of subject applications.
Lee Albert, 1200 North Main Street, Suite 610, Santa
Ana, representing the applicant, requested a 30 -day
continuance in order to produce additional witnesses.
Motion to Continue A motion was made by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by
Failed to Carry Councilman McFarland, to continue this item to Septem-
ber 7, 1982. The motion failed to carry 3-2, Council
Members Schafer, Hertzog, and Johnson voting no.
Lee Albert stated his opinion that there was a question
as to the constitutionality of the City's Ordinance. He
also reported that the applicants will make any conces-
sions regarding parking requirements.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
MOTION A motion was made by Councilman McFarland, seconded by
Applications Councilwoman Hertzog, to deny the applications based on
Denied the findings and analysis contained in the Staff Report
4.:ir, `'
and the recommendations of
Redevelopment Agency. The
Mayor Hall voting no.
the Planning Commission and
motion carried 4-1, Vice
PUBLIC HEARING
The Clerk announced the public hearing concerning an
Appeal of
appeal from Warren G. Althoff, 1523 Orange Avenue, Costa
ZE-82-102
Mesa, of the Planning Commission's approval of Zone
Lockhart/Powers
Exception ZE-82-102 and Tentative Map for Tract 11823,
Roger Daniel Lockhart, authorized agent for Neil J.
Powers, 515 Santa Ana Avenue, Newport Beach, for a
Conditional Use Permit with a variance from side setback
requirements for the construction of two condominium
units, and a Tentative Tract Map for a one -lot subdivi-
sion, located at 1528 Orange Avenue, in an R2 zone.
Environmental Determination: Exempt. The Affidavit
of Mailing is on file in the Clerk's office. No com-
munications have been received.
Roger Lockhart, 2182 Dupont Drive, Suite 214, Irvine,
stated that he would be residing in one of the units
and that the project would upgrade the neighborhood.
John W. Tucker, representing the appellant, spoke in
opposition to the project because he felt it would
increase traffic in the area and he opposed multiple
units.
Warren Althoff also spoke in opposition to the project
because he favored single-family residences in the
area.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
MOTION On motion by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by Councilman
Zone Exception McFarland, and carried, the zone exception permit was
Approved approved subject to conditions recommended by the
Planning Commission.
PUBLIC HEARING The Clerk announced the public hearing to consider the
Accessory Structure appeal from George Van Dam, 486 Magnolia Street, Costa
at 492 Magnolia Mesa, regarding the Planning Commission's decision on
Street/Van Dam July 12, 1982, approving revised plans for accessory
structure at 492 Magnolia Street, allowing a height
of 15 feet 5-1/2 inches.
George Van Dam spoke in opposition to allowing the
additional 5-1/2 inches and requested that Council
order the accessory structure lowered to 15 feet as
required by Code.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
In response to questions from Vice Mayor Hall, the
Development Services Director explained that the
Planning and Building Codes vary on how heights are
measured. Approval of the additional 5-1/2 inches was
given because he felt it was not enough of a deviation
to order the accessory structure lowered to 15 feet.
MOTION A motion was made by Vice Mayor Hall, upholding the
Decisions decisions of the Development Services Director and the
Upheld Planning Commission, approving the present height of
the accessory structure. The motion was seconded by
Councilwoman Hertzog, and carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARING The Clerk announced the public hearing to consider the
Accessory Structure appeal from William Gallagher, 492 Magnolia Street,
at 492 Magnolia Costa Mesa, regarding the Planning Commission's decision
Street/Gallagher on July 12, 1982, requiring the lofts in the accessory
structure to be enclosed, and limiting facilities in the
1
bathroom to a sink and toilet. Mr. Gallagher has
requested permission to install a shower and to leave
the loft areas open.
William Gallagher was present and explained that he
wants the lofts open for easy access. He also stated
that a shower is needed because he is now having a
swimming pool installed, and he has a sauna in the
accessory structure.
George Van Dam, 486 Magnolia Street, spoke in opposi-
tion to Mr. Gallagher's request.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
Vice Mayor Hall and Councilwoman Hertzog commented that
Mr. Gallagher's project was well done and was an asset
to the neighborhood.
MOTION On motion by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by Councilwoman
Appellant's Hertzog, and carried 5-0, Mr. Gallagher's requests
Requests Granted for open lofts and installation of a shower were
granted.
PUBLIC HEARING The Clerk announced -that this was the time and place
Weed Abatement set for the public hearing to consider a proposed
resolution approving and confirming the report of the
Fire Chief or his designee, showing the cost of
removing the rubbish and weeds and refuse or dirt on
or in front of each separate parcel of land in the
City of Costa Mesa. The Affidavit of Posting is on
file in the Clerk's office. No communications have
been received.
Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, spoke con-
cerning assessment of each parcel and procedure for
notification of property owners.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
MOTION On motion by Councilman McFarland, seconded by Council -
Resolution 82-63 woman Hertzog, Resolution 82-63, being A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE FIRE CHIEF
OR HIS DESIGNEE, SHOWING THE COST OF REMOVING THE
RUBBISH AND WEEDS AND REFUSE OR DIRT ON OR IN FRONT OF
EACH PARCEL OF LAND IN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, was
adopted by the following roll -call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Recess The Mayor declared a recess at 8:15 p.m., and the meet-
ing reconvened at 8:25 p.m.
Council
Former Mayor Alvin Pinkley commended the Council for
Commended
their courtesy to the public.
PUBLIC HEARING
The Clerk announced that this was the time and place
GP -82-2A
set for the public hearing to consider General Plan
Sakioka Farms
Amendment GP -82-2A; Curci-England Company, 21515 Haw-
thorne Boulevard, Suite 500, Torrance, authorized agent
for Sakioka Farms, Incorporated, 14850 East Sunflower
Avenue, Santa Ana, for permission to delete General
Plan Guideline "A" -(project phasing) of General Plan
Amendment GP -78-3A (revised), for property located
between the San Diego Freeway and Sunflower Avenue, and
between Avenue of the Arts and Main Street, in PDC and
110
nW
PDR -HD zones. Environmental Determination: Environ-
mental Impact Report accepted for General Plan Amendment
GP -78-3A. The Affidavit of Publication is on file in
the Clerk's office. No communications have been
received.
The Staff Report contains three options: Retain the
Guidelines as adopted; Delete the Guideline as requested
by the applicant; or Retain the Guideline in a modified
form.
The Planning staff recommended Option III with the modi-
fied wording suggested in the applicant's letter dated
June 9, 1982. The Planning Commission recommended a
fourth land use option which would retain the language
of the Project Phasing Guideline as adopted by the City
Council but would delay implementation until prior to
the issuance of building permits for Building No. 3 of
Phase I.
Michael Oberst, Curci-England Company, spoke in support
of the Planning staff's recommendation.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
Mayor Schafer commented that this project has been
extensively studied by the Council at previous Study
Sessions and that this is the reason Council does not
have need for detailed discussion.
MOTION On motion by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by Councilman
Resolution 82-64 Johnson, Resolution 82-64, being A RESOLUTION OF THE
Adopted CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP -82-2A, TO MODIFY
THE "PROJECT PHASING" GUIDELINE OF GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT GP -78-3A (REVISED), was adopted by the follow-
ing roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
McFarland, Johnson
None
None
PUBLIC HEARING The Clerk announced that this was the time and place set
Supplement to for the public hearing to consider the draft supplement
EIR for GP -78-3A to the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Gen-
Sakioka Farms eral Plan Amendment GP -78-3A, for the same applicant
and for the same property as shown for the previous
item, General Plan Amendment GP -82-2A. The Affidavit
of Publication is on file in the Clerk's office. No
communications have been received.
ZE-82-84 and In connection with subject property, the Clerk presented
Tract No. 10950R2 Zone Exception ZE-82-84, for a 1.3 -million -square -foot
Planned Development, with a variance from required land-
scape setback, and a Conditional Use Permit for off-site
parking and pay parking; and Tentative Map for Tract
10950R2, a revised map to create a 14 -lot subdivision.
The Senior Planner gave a brief summary of the three
items being considered. Referring to the supplement to
the final Environmental Impact Report for General Plan
Amendment GP -78-3A, the Senior Planner reported that the
supplement is necessary in order to address additional
environmental impacts of the current proposal not con-
tained in the previous environmental documentation, that
is, to discuss the building height and shade/shadow
impacts of the proposed 10-, ll-, and 14 -story buildings.
The Planning Commission and Planning staff recommended
acceptance.
no
In regard to Zone Exception ZE-82-84, the project is
designed in two clusters of three buildings, each with
a central plaza and common parking and circulation.
The first phase cluster consists of one 14 -story and
two 11 -story buildings while the second phase cluster
contains one 14 -story and two 10 -story buildings. The
first phase will have all surface parking; the completed
project will include three parking structures. The
Senior Planner reported that the Planning Commission
recommended approval of the Development Plan with the
exception of the specific height and location of build-
ings in the second phase. The request for a variance
for reduction in landscaping on Anton Boulevard was
recommended for denial by the Commission.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the
Tentative Map for Tract 10950R2 with the consolidation
of Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 into Lot 5.
The Senior Planner reported that the applicant has
already complied with Condition No. 9 relating to
archaeological testing on a portion of the site. In
a memorandum dated July 28, 1982, the Senior Planner
has recommended that an additional finding be included
for approval of Zone Exception ZE-82-84 as required by
Section 15088 of the Guidelines: "That changes or
alterations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project which mitigate or avoid significant
environmental effects thereof (shade/shadow and build-
ing height) as identified in the Amended Supplement to
the Environmental Impact Report for the Sakioka Farms
General Plan Amendment GP -78-3A (SCH No. 78100988)".
However, in a letter dated July 26, 1982, the applicant
has suggested additional expansion of the above finding
and expansion of the findings for Tentative Tract No.
10950R2 to ensure that adequate legal written findings
are made to support Council action for their applica-
tions.
The Senior Planner also reported that the applicant
has raised questions concerning alternative methods of
funding in lieu of a cash deposit relating to construc-
tion'of traffic signals in conjunction with the project.
Michael Oberst, Curci-England Company, spoke in regard
to conditions recommended for Zone Exception ZE-82-84.
Mr. Oberst reported that Conditions Nos. 3 and 9 have
already been completed.
Referring to Condition No. 6, "No building permits shall
be issued for development in excess of 750,000 gross
square feet of commercial building area until necessary
contributions are made to Phase II of the areawide cir-
culation improvement program", Mr. Oberst suggested that
Council specify a contribution, possibly to an alterna-
tive traffic improvement plan if it appears Phase II of
the Central Orange County Circulation Study (CENTROCCS)
will not be completed by that time. The Mayor responded
that it was not possible to specify a certain amount at
the present time.' The Assistant City Engineer recom-
mended that Condition No. 6 not be modified at this
time, however, if in the future the applicant cannot
meet that condition, he can then request a modification.
Mr. Oberst referred to Conditions Nos. 25 and 26 which
require cash deposits totaling $200,000.00 in connection
with construction of certain traffic signals, and asked
that the applicant be permitted to post a bond or a
Certificate of Deposit in lieu of a -cash deposit. The
Assistant City Engineer and the Council agreed that the
request could be'granted.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
72
MUIION A motion was made by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by
EIR Supplement Councilman Johnson, to accept as adequate and accurate
for GP -78-3A the supplement to the Environmental Impact Report for
Accepted General Plan Amendment GP -78-3A. The motion carried
5-0.
MOTION Vice Mayor Hall made a motion to approve Zone Exception
ZE-82-84 ZE-82-84 as recommended by the Planning Commission;
Approved based on the analysis and findings contained in the
Staff Report, with the additional finding contained on
the first page of applicant's letter dated July 26,
1982; and subject to all conditions contained in the
Staff Report, including Condition No. 44 added by the
Planning Commission; and modification of Conditions
Nos. 25 and 26, stipulating that a cash deposit is not
necessary and that a bond will be acceptable in lieu
of a cash deposit. The motion was seconded by Council-
man Johnson, and carried 5-0.
MOTION A motion was made by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by
Tentative'Map Councilman Johnson, to approve Tentative Map for Tract
for Tract No. No. 10950R2 as recommended by the Planning Commission;
10950R2 Approved based on the analysis and findings contained in the
.Staff Report, with the additional finding contained on
the second page of applicant's letter dated July 26,
1982; and subject to all conditions contained in the
Staff Report. The motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARING The Clerk announced that this was the time and place
GP -82-2B set for the public hearing for General Plan Amendment
GP -82-2B, City of Costa Mesa, for permission to amend
the City's procedures and policies for.administration
and implementation of the General Plan. The Affidavit
of Publication is on file in the Clerk's office. No
communications have been received.
There being no speakers, the Mayor closed the public
hearing.
MOTION
On motion by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by Councilman
Resolution 82-65
McFarland, Resolutions 73-144, 75-24, 75-99, and 81-96
Adopted
were repealed, and Resolution 82-65, being A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALI-
FORNIA, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP -82-2B,
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
incorporating the report entitled, "General Plan Admin-
istration and Implementation Policies and Procedures",
was,adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Schafer, Hall, Hertzog,
McFarland, Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Commissioners
Mayor Schafer welcomed Planning Commissioners Walter
Welcomed
Davenport and Mark Sloate who were in the audience.
NEW BUSINESS The Clerk presented Encroachment Permit EP -82-04, Roda
EP -82-04 Selden, 230 East 17th Street, Costa Mesa, to allow an
Selden awning to encroach into the public right-of-way at the
above address, in a Cl zone. Environmental Determina-
tion: Exempt.
The Planning Commission and Planning staff recommended
approval subject to conditions contained in the Staff
Report.
Mel Selden was present and submitted renderings of the
project for Council review.
MOTION On motion by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by Councilman
Permit Approved Johnson, and carried 5-0, the permit was approved based
1
on the findings and analysis and subject to conditions
contained in the Staff Report.
Mortgage Funding The Clerk presented a request from William and Louis,
for Moderate Incorporated, 2633 Harbor Boulevard, Costa Mesa, for
Income Families Council discussion regarding methods of assisting
moderate income families in obtaining affordable mort-
gage money for purchasing the six condominium units
located at 675 West 18th Street, by City participation
in the Orange County Mortgage Bond Program or by pro-
viding Housing and Community Development Act (HCDA)
funds.
William Pressey, William and Louis, Incorporated, was
present to answer questions from the Council.
Councilman McFarland stated he was opposed to the use
of HCDA funds for mortgage assistance and that the bond-
ing program would be the only method he would possibly
consider.
Vice Mayor Hall voiced his opposition to City involve-
ment with mortgage financing.
MOTION A motion was made by Vice Mayor Hall, seconded by Coun-
Request Denied cilman Johnson, and carried 5-0, denying the request.
ORAL Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, spoke regard -
COMMUNICATIONS ing the City's weed abatement program, specifically
methods of assessment and notification to the property
owners.
Mr. Soffer also.asked questions regarding public notices -
and the City,Clerk-and City Attorney responded to his
inquiries.
In response to another question from Mr. Soffer, the
Assistant City Engineer stated that the definitions for
"alley" and "street" were being researched by staff.
Bikeways Costa Mesa Traffic Commissioner Robert Graham expressed
his thanks to the Council for updating the City bikeway
program.
Fairview Mr. Graham suggested that Council consider a museum,
Regional Park art center, or a memorial to Vietnam veterans for the
Fairview Regional Park area.
COUNCILMANIC
COMMENTS Councilwoman Hertzog presented a proposed resolution
from the Orange County Division, League of California
Solid Waste Cities, requesting member cities to review the possi-
Gate Fees bility of participating in litigation against the
County of Orange in connection with the Board of Super-
visors' action on July 13, 1982, adopting a solid waste
management gate fee.
MOTION A motion was made by''C.ouncilwoman Hertzog, seconded by
Join Litigation Councilman McFarland, to-jojn the League in litigation.
Vice Mayor Hall, asked if the other 25 cities in the
County have already agreed tojoin in litigation.
Councilwoman Hertzog responded that all Councils are
discussing the question attheir respective meetings
and a vote will be taken at. -the League meeting on
August 12, 1982.
Vice Mayor Hall stated his preference for a joint powers
agreement rather than a lawsuit.
Councilwoman Hertzog reported that attempts have been
made to discuss the fees with the Board of Supervisors
but Board Members have refused to discuss the matter.
ine City Attorney advised the Council that the object
of the lawsuit is to overturn the Board's decision based
on procedural shortcomings.
Councilman'McFarland reported on the League meeting he
attended on July 29, 1982, and stated that none of the
cities disagreed with the suggested $4.90 per ton fee,
but that there was no justification for the adopted
$7.00 per ton fee. He also stated that cities were
dissatisfied with the method used by the Board to
implement the gate fees.
Vice Mayor Hall suggested that this item be continued
to August 12, 1982, in order to make an attempt for
further discussion with the Board Members. Council-
woman Hertzog responded that all attempts for further
discussion have been futile.
Councilman McFarland stated that if a vote were taken
now, he would vote against litigation,.however, if this
decision is continued to August 9 so that the Mayor
could attempt to contact Supervisor Thomas Riley, and
if this attempt failed, he would be willing to join in
litigation against the County.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION A substitute motion was made by Vice Mayor Hall to
Held Over continue this item to an adjourned meeting on August 9,
1982. The motion was seconded by Councilman Johnson,
and carried 5-0.
A.B. 3283 Councilman McFarland presented a communication from the
Sales Tax Orange County Division, League of California Cities,
Increase concerning Assembly Bill 3283 (Robinson), which would
authorize the Orange County Transportation Commission
(OCTC) to place a measure on the ballot to increase
sales tax in Orange County by 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, or 1 per-
cent for transportation improvements. The League has
recommended necessary amendments designed to ensure
voter approval of the measure with a majority vote.
However, another amendment is under consideration which
would restructure the OCTC to include all five members
of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, five city
representatives, and one public member. The League
supports AB 3283 with amendments dealing only with
requiring voter approval'of the ballot measure by a
majority vote. The League has requested each city in
Orange County to actively oppose AB 3282 if it is
amended to accomplish any restructuring of the Orange
County Transportation Coalition.
The Assistant City Manager reported that the City of
Costa Mesa has already taken.a position on this measure.
ADJOURNMENT At 10:15 p.m., the Mayor adjourned the meeting to August
9, 1982, at,2:00 p.m., in the fifth floor Conference
Room of Ci'ty;Hall, for,the purpose of further discussion
concerni'ng'-the Orange County Board of Supervisors'
action regarding gate fees at landfills.
UA
ayor of the City of Cos Mesa
ATTEST:
sa
y Clerko the ity o osta