HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/16/1992 - City Council240
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF COSTA MESA
MARCH 16, 1992
The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California,
.met in regular. session March 16, 1992, at 6:30 p.m., in
the Council Chambers of City Hall, 77 Fair. Drive, Costa
Mesa. The meeting was called to order by the Mayor.,
followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, and
invocation by the Reverend Lothar. Tornow, Christ
iLutheran Church.
ROLL CALL .Council Members Present: Mayor. Mary Hornbuckle
Vice Mayor. Sandra Genis
Council Member. Peter. Buffa
Council Member. Jay Humphrey
Council Member. Joe Erickson
Council Members Absent:
Officials Present:
None
City Manager. Allan Roeder.
City Attorney Thomas Kathe
Deputy City Manager./Develop-
ment Services Donald Lamm
Public Services Director
William Morris
City Clerk Eileen Phinney
MINUTES On motion by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by Council
February 27, Member. Humphrey, and carried 5-0, the minutes of the
March 2, and special meeting of February 27, 1992, the regular. meet-
March
eetMarch 9, 1992 ing of March 2, 1992, and the special meeting of March
9, 1992, were approved as distributed.
ORDINANCES A motion was made by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by
Council Member. Erickson, and carried 5-0, to read all
ordinances by title only.
PROCLAMATIONS Mayor. Hornbuckle declared the month of March as "Red
"Red Cross Month" Cross Month" in honor. of 129 years of humanitarian
service.
"Week of the Mayor. Hornbuckle read a proclamation declaring the week
Young Child" of April 4 through 10, 1992, as "Week of the Young
Child", and presented the document to John-LeVere, Patti
Smith, and Gay Geiser. -Sandoval, who -accepted on behalf
of the Child Care Committee.
PRESENTATION
Students from the Paularino School DARE Class and their.
Paularino School
teacher., Judy Riley, gave a musical presentation on the
DARE Class
DARE Program. Lieutenant John Fitzpatrick and Senior.
Police Officer. Darlene Bell were in attendance represen-
ting the Costa Mesa Police Department.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
The Mayor announced that the following items would be
taken out of order to be discussed immediately after. the
Consent Calendar.: New Business 1, request from Orange
Coast College for street closures for. the Annual 5K
Run/Walk; and New Business 2, request from Costa
Mesa -Newport Harbor. Lions Club for staff support, street
closures, banners, and insurance waiver for its annual
Fish Fry Parade and Carnival.
The Mayor announced that the public comment portion of
the public hearing on the General Plan had been closed
at a previous meeting, and any related comments should
be made under. Oral Communications.
7
L
C
,a
241
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Dale Karjala, 3185-C Airway Avenue, Costa Mesa, spoke
Koll-Irvine Lawsuit regarding the fuel tanks at John Wayne Airport, and he
urged support of their lawsuit against the County of
Orange, Orange County Superior. Court Case No. 87-92-53.
General Plan George Sakioka, Sakioka Fauns, 14850 Sunflower. Avenue,
Costa Mesa, addressed the General Plan commenting that
as landowners in the north end of Costa Mesa their. Floor.
Area Ratio (FAR) will be cut in half due to traffic
considerations thereby destroying the economic viability
of future projects.
Malcolm Ross, representing C. J. Segerstrom and Sons,
3315 Fairview Road, Costa Mesa, expressed concern
regarding the additional expansion space at South Coast
Plaza, specifically the 250,000 square feet above and
beyond the 0.60 FAR, indicating that the expansion would
not impact surrounding intersections.
Bob Break, Latham and Watkins, Attorneys at Law, 650
Town Center. Drive, 20th Floor, Costa Mesa, representing
the Newport Mesa Unified School District, spoke regard-
ing the Bear. Street School site surplus property, and
requested that the Low Density Residential land use
designation be retained. He emphasized that: (1) this
request is supported by Government Code Section 65852.9,
which states the intent to ensure that unused school
sites can be developed to the same extent as permitted
on adjacent property; (2) the zoning of said property
must remain the same to avoid unnecessary costs and
delays to the school district; and (3) we continue to
submit that the surrounding property for. the Bear. Street
site is largely residential; we can debate the inten-
sity, but it is certainly residential, and a Low Density
Residential designation is currently handled on the
site; it is perfectly satisfactory to the District.
Roy Pizarek, 1923 Whittier. Street, Costa Mesa, commented
on the success of Canyon Park. He recommended that the
19th Street Transition Zone be changed to a use as
recommended in the RUDAT (Regional Urban Design Assis-
tance Team) Study.
Tom Sutro, 2956 Pemba Drive, Costa Mesa, President,
Newport -Mesa Association of Realtors, read a letter
concerning the changes in density levels for parcels
greater. than Rl, stating that private property rights
will be compromised. He recommended that the density
change portion of the General Plan be pulled and consid-
ered separately.
Herbert Smith, representing Southern California College,
55 Fair. Drive, Costa Mesa, spoke regarding the proposed
.25 FAR stating it was unacceptable for short and long
term uses of property and would jeopardize operation of
the college on this property. He requested that the
City consider the concept of an Urban Civic Center.
Commercial zone for the college and City properties.
Colm Macken, Vice President, Transpacific Development
Company, 2377 Crenshaw Boulevard, Torrance, stated that
regarding the South Coast Metro Center located at the
corner. of Anton Boulevard and Avenue of the Arts, a
sketch had been submitted showing a proposed park of
approximately 2.85 acres and the remaining acreage if
developed to 35 dwelling units per acre would account
for. 540 residential units.
1
Fritz Muders, 940 West 19th Street, Costa Mesa, stated
lie lived in the Harbor Vista Homes, the area is not an
industrial area, and most people on 19th Street would
like it to remain as it is.
Ken Hutchins, 340 Costa Mesa Street, Costa Mesa, stated
that he owns the property at the corner of Victoria
Street and Pomona Avenue and had planned to build three
units, but under the new General Plan will only be
allowed to build two. He recommended giving the Plan-
ning Commission authorization to look at projects on a
case-by-case basis so they can determine if there are
exceptions.
Larry Weichman, Vice President of Safeguard Investments,
1565 Scenic Avenue, Costa Mesa, spoke about numerous
investors who could potentially lose millions of dollars
in property valuation if the General Plan is approved.
He noted a similar case in South Carolina which is now
being reviewed by the United States Supreme Court. He
recommended postponing the vote on the General Plan and
consider a more workable solution that will limit the
liability to the City.
Mike Steiner., 1560 Superior. Avenue, Costa Mesa, stated
he was not aware of the proposed zoning changes, and
he suggested not making a decision until alternatives
are considered, such as increasing open space and
parking requirements.
Don Ward, no address given, requested that Council
reconsider the downgrading of property and adoption of
the General Plan because of the citizens who are unaware
of the proposed changes.
Dick Sherrick, 3146 Country Club Drive, Costa Mesa,
stated he believes the General Plan has had a fair hear-
ing and should not be amended by granting exceptions at
this point. Regarding Country Club Drive, he commented
that it is not clear whether. the Collector designation
will be changed to Commuter. Highway.
Carey Ward, 126 East 19th Street, Costa Mesa, stated
that he is opposed to the General Plan as proposed as
citizens would be impacted by a general density reduc-
tion of 20 percent. He suggested there be further
discussion before adoption.
Soffer. Comments
Sid Soffer., 900 Arbor. Street, Costa Mesa, pointed out
that the piano which was used for a previous presenta-
tion was situated in the aisle of the Chambers and was
blocking the fire exit which placed the City in viola-
tion of the State Fire Code; the room was previously
overoccupied which is also a hazard; and announced that
he would go to the Fire Department to verify that these
are violations. He then spoke about the rounding up
practice as it applied to his property on Bernard
Street, and he requested answers to the following
questions: (1) are City policies as defined by staff
enforceable as law, and (2) what authority does the City
Attorney's office have for filing criminal or civil
complaints against citizens without the direction of the
City Council. Mayor. Hornbuckle directed the City Attor-
ney to respond.
RECESS
The Mayor declared a recess at 7:45 p.m., and the meet-
ing reconvened at 8:00 p.m.
1
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items were removed from the Consent Calen-
dar.: Item 6, Resolutions providing authorization to
apply for Measure "M" regional funds in accordance with
the Combined Transportation Funding Program.
On motion by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by Council
Member. Erickson, the remaining Consent Calendar items
were approved in one motion by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Humphrey, Erickson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
READING FOLDER
On motion by Council Member, Buffa, seconded by Council
Member Erickson, and carried 5-0, the following Reading
Folder items were received and processed:
Claims
Claims received by the City Clerk: Michael and
Christi Baldwin; Cesar. Carbajal; Helen Cowley; Craig
and Eileen Hoss; Gregory Howell and American Cosmetic
Manufacturing Labs, Incorporated, dba Island Trader.;
Victor. J. Ordaz; Stephen and Deborah Scherfee, and
Greg Walloch; and Paul and Juliet Simon.
Adequate Funding
Resolution from the City of Galt, urging the Governor.
for. Alcoholic
to restore adequate funding to the State Department
Beverage Control
of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
Public
Notice from the California Public Utilities Commission
Utilities
advising that Southern California Edison Company has
Commission
filed Application No. 90-12-018 regarding increased
electrical rates.
SET FOR PUBLIC
On motion by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by Council
HEARING
Member. Erickson, Resolution 92-12, A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
Weed Abatement
DETERMINING AND DECLARING THAT RUBBISH AND WEEDS ARE A
Program
PUBLIC NUISANCE; DIRECTING THE FIRE CHIEF OR HIS DESIG-
NEE TO REMOVE SAID RUBBISH AND DESTROY SAID WEEDS AS
MOTION
REQUIRED BY LAW; FIXING THE TIME FOR HEARING ALL OBJEC-
Resolution 92-12
TIONS OR PROTESTS; AND DIRECTING THE ABATEMENT OF SAID
Adopted; Hearing
RUBBISH AND WEEDS, setting a public hearing for. April 6,
Set for. April 6,
1992, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City
1992
Hall, was adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Humphrey, Erickson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
WARRANTS
On motion by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by Council
Member. Erickson, Warrant Resolution 1515, including Pay -
MOTION
roll 9205, was approved by the following roll call vote:
Warrant 1515
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Approved
Humphrey, Erickson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE
The Director. of Public Services recommended approval of
ACTIONS
an agreement with Computer. Service Company, 2230 East
Agreement with
Orangethorpe Avenue, Fullerton, for. $55,000.00, to pr.o-
Computer. Service
vide interim traffic signal maintenance for six months.
Company
On motion by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by Council
Member. Erickson, the City Manager's approval of the
Traffic Signal
agreement was ratified by the following roll call vote:
Maintenance
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Humphrey, Erickson
MOTION
NOES: None
Agreement Approved
ABSENT: None
-il 2.44
Agreement with
Bank of America
Banking Services
MOTION
Agreement Approved
Change Order. "B"
to BSI Consul-
tants Contract
Design of
Intersection
Signal
Improvements
MOTION
Change Order.
Approved
Finance Depart-
ment Records
Destruction
MOTION
Resolution 92-13
Adopted
Measure "M"
Regional Funds
MOTION
Resolutions 92-14
through 92-25
Adopted
;The Finance Director recommended approval of an agree-
ment with Bank of America, Regional Commercial Banking
Office, 3233 Park Center. Drive, Fifth Floor., Costa Mesa,
to provide banking services to the City of Costa Mesa.-
On
esa.On motion by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by Council
Member. Erickson, the agreement was approved, and the
Mayor. and City Clerk were authorized to sign on behalf
of the City. The motion carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Humphrey, Erickson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The Public Services Director recommended approval of
Change Order. "B" for. $1,500.00 to the contract with BSI
Consultants, Incorporated, 2001 East 1st Street, Santa
Ana, for design of intersection signal improvements on
Placentia Avenue at the City Corporation Yard and
Estancia High School. On motion by Council Member.
Buffa, seconded by Council Member. Erickson, the change
order was approved,by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Humphrey, Erickson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
On motion by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by Council
Member. Erickson, Resolution 92-13, A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING RECORDS DESTRUCTION FOR THE FINANCE DEPART-
MENT OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE
NO. 75-60, was adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Humphrey, Erickson
j NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Item 6 on the Consent Calendar, was presented: Twelve
resolutions providing authorization to apply for. Measure
"M" regional funds in accordance with the Combined
Transportation Funding Program. Vice Mayor. Genis stated
that she did not believe that all listed intersections
were consistent with the spirit of Measure "M" in that
none of the intersections to be improved should be those
which would otherwise be funded with developer. fees.
Dick Sherrick, 3146 Country Club Drive, Costa Mesa,
asked if the 1988 North Costa Mesa Arterial Traffic
Study information was being used to correct these inter. -
sections. The Director. of Public Services replied that
this study was used, as well as the I-405 Freeway Access
Study, in helping to determine which projects were
applicable, and he stated that the "call for projects"
is on March 27, 1992, and would include all projects
,is
for. the 1991-92 fiscal year..
Amotion was made by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by
Council Member. Erickson, to adopt the following
resolutions:
Resolution 92-14, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF STATE ROUTES 55/73 CONNECTOR ROADS.
245
Resolution 92-15, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF THE HARBOR BOULEVARD AND ADAMS AVENUE
INTERSECTION.
Resolution 92-16, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF I-405 FREEWAY RAMPS AT BRISTOL STREET.
Resolution 92-17, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF THE HARBOR BOULEVARD AND GISLER AVENUE
INTERSECTION.
Resolution 92-18, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF THE I-405 FREEWAY NORTHBOUND FAIRVIEW
MAD OFF -RAMP TERMINUS.
Resolution 92-19, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE I-405 FREEWAY NORTHBOUND SOUTH
COAST DRIVE OFF -RAMP.
Resolution 92-20, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND THE SOUTHBOUND
I-405 FREEWAY OFF -RAMP.
Resolution 92-21, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF THE FAIRVIEW ROAD AND WILSON STREET
INTERSECTION.
Resolution 92-22, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF BRISTOL STREET/I-405 FREEWAY OVER -
CROSSING WIDENING.
Resolution 92-23, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND SOUTH COAST DRIVE.
1 ,�. 240
Resolution 92-24, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS
IMPROVEMENT OF THE 17TH STREET/SUPERIOR AVENUE INTER-
SECTION.
Resolution 92-25, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ORANGE
COUNTY COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS THE
IMPROVEMENT OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND THE NORTHBOUND
I-405 FREE AY OFF -RAMP.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Hornbuckle, Buffa, Humphrey
Erickson
NOES: Genis
ABSENT: None
NEW BUSINESS
The City Clerk presented a request from Orange Coast
Street Closures
College for closure of Monitor. and Merrimac Ways for the
for. Annual 5K
Annual 5K Run/Walk. Ann Gyben, Assistant to the City
Run/Walk
Manager., reviewed the Agenda Report dated March 11, 1992.
Lieutenant Alan Kent, Costa Mesa Police Department,
explained that typically two full-time motor officers
Were employed every year for this event for a minimum of
four, staffing hours', plus approximately two police aides
to support the program, which would amount to a cost of
less than $2,000.00, and the college has always been
MOTION
cooperative about paying the fees. On motion by Council
Street Closures
Member. Erickson, seconded by Council Member. Humphrey,
Approved
and carried 5-0, the request for street closures was
approved.
NEW BUSINESS
The City Clerk presented a request from the Costa Mesa -
Fish Fry Parade
Newport Harbor. Lions Club for staff support, including
and Carnival
street closures, banners, and insurance waiver., for. the
Fish Fry Parade and Carnival, which is being held the
Weekend of May 29, 30, and 31, 1992. The Assistant to
the City Manager summarized the Agenda Report dated
March 9, 1992. She reported that the use of Club
volunteers could substantially reduce the staff support
figure of $40,143.33.
Hugo Hunziker., 2135 President Place, Costa Mesa, Presi-
dent of the Lions Club, stated that they did not have
volunteers at this time but would like work with the
City to organize a volunteer. program. The City Manager
stated that this item is in this year's budget.
MOTION
On motion by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by Council
Staff Support
Member. Erickson, the following action was taken for. the
Approved
Lions Club Fish Fry and Parade: approved waiver of the
cost for staff support in the amount of $40,143.33;
approved a grant of $650.00, to be taken from the
Council Contingency Fund, to purchase an additional $1
million in insurance coverage; approved hanging of 100
banners on Southern California Edison utility poles on
19th Street, Harbor. Boulevard, 17th Street, Fairview
Road, and Baker. Street; approved street closures on
Wilson Street, College Avenue, Harbor. Boulevard, West
19th Street, Anaheim Avenue, West 18th Street, and Park
Avenue; and directed staff to work with the Lions Club
on the issue of obtaining volunteers. The motion
carried by the following roll call vote:
1
247
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Humphrey Erickson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC HEARING The City Clerk announced the public hearing, continued
Locations for. from .the meeting of February 18, 1992, to consider. an
Food or. Beverage ordinance amending Title 13 of the Costa Mesa Municipal
Service Code relating to the regulation of establishments where
food and beverages are served. Communications were
received from William N. Sokol, M.D., 2011 Westcliff
Drive, Newport Beach, and Sidney A. Crossley, Jr..,
Tempest Equity, 16912 Bolsa Chica Road, Huntington Beach,
who opposed the proposed ordinance; and Sheila Ward, 122
Magnolia Street, Apartment D, Costa Mesa, who wrote in
support of the regulation.
Kimberly Brandt, Associate Planner., reviewed the Agenda
Report dated March 9, 1992, reporting that the purpose
of the proposed ordinance was: (1) to simplify the
Planning Division's process and review of establishments
where food or beverages are served for businesses that
are within 200 feet of residential areas, and (2) to
require Conditional Use Permits (CUP) for businesses
that would be selling alcoholic beverages between 11:00
p.m. and 2:00 a.m. She clarified that existing bars and
restaurants that do not conform with the development
standards that are contained within the ordinance would be
considered legal nonconforming uses, and they could
continue with their present operation without requiring a
CUP; however., should the business change ownership, or
character or mode of operation, a CUP or. Minor. CUP would
be required.
The Deputy City Manager./Development Services stated that
the majority of the telephone calls received in response
to the notification sent out by the City expressed
concern related to the clause requiring a CUP when a bar
or restaurant changes ownership.
The following people spoke in opposition to the proposed
ordinance because of the negative affect on the value of
the bar and restaurant type of business: Richard Dodd,
201 Shipyard Way, Berth A, Cabin F, Newport Beach, owner
of property at 1670 Newport Boulevard; Johanna Chaney,
810 West 19th Street, Costa Mesa, owner of a nightclub
on 19th Street; Paul Hendrickson, owner. of Pierce Street
Annex, 330 East 17th Street; Gerhard Ziemer., 212 Lillian
Place, Costa Mesa, owner. of Henry and Harry's Goat Hill
Tavern; William C. Smith, Jr.., Vice President, Grand
American Fare, which runs the business at the Costa Mesa
Omelet Parlor and the Chester. Drawers Inn; Lenny
Garofalo, owner. of Garf's Restaurant, 1550 Superior.
Avenue; Greg McConaughy, owner. of Shooters Tequila Bar.
and Cafe, 725 West Baker. Street; Gino Goero, owner. of
Gino's on the Hill, 428 East 17th Street; Jim Walker.,
President of the Orange County Chapter of the California
Restaurant Association and owner. of Pasta Mesa, 212 East
17th Street; Gary Brubaker., 26932 Highwood Circle,
Laguna Hills, owner of the two El Pollo Loco restaurants
in Costa Mesa; Fernando Navarrete, owner. of Scampi Res-
taurant, 1576 Newport Boulevard; Sid Soffer., 900 Arbor.
Street, Costa Mesa; Gregory Howell, former owner of the
Island Trader., 1500 Newport Boulevard; Lee Heinz, Execu-
tive Director of the Costa Mesa Chamber. of Commerce; and
Brian Tesh Burke, owner of the Blue Marble Coffeehouse,
1907 Harbor. Boulevard.
24�
;Speaking in support of the proposed ordinance were Roy
iPizarek, 1923 Whittier. Avenue, Costa Mesa; James Wells,
President, Mesa Verde Homeowner's Association, 1797
'Oriole Drive, Costa Mesa; and Steven Park, 1944 Church
Street, Costa Mesa.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
MOTION A motion was made by Mayor. Hornbuckle, seconded by
Form Ad Hoc Council Member. Erickson, to direct staff to form an ad
Committee hoc committee comprised of restaurant owners and a
representative from the east and west side homeowner's
'associations to address the ordinance, specifically the
vagueness of the text in Section 13-244, "the provisions
of this article shall apply to any existing nonconform-
�ing establishment prior to any change in ownership
and/or, mode or character of the operation."
Vice Mayor. Genis mentioned several areas to be dis-
cussed: (1) requiring a use permit for establishments
serving alcohol within 200 feet of a residential area at
any time of the day; (2) distinguishing between a non-
conforming use versus an establishment that by its
characteristics is nonconforming; (3) examining the
difference between a restaurant where alcohol is inci-
dental to food service and vice versa; and (4) examining
the entertainment and dancing aspects.
AMENDED MOTION Mayor. Hornbuckle amended the original motion by with -
Item Withdrawn drawing this item for the time being. The amended
motion was seconded by Council Member. Erickson, and
carried 5-0.
RECESS The Mayor, declared a recess at 9:45 p.m., and the meet-
ing reconvened at 10:00 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING The City Clerk announced the public hearing, continued
1990 General from the meeting of March 2, 1992, for. the 1990 General
Plan Plan. A communication was received from Herbert L.
Smith, Vice President for. Business, Southern Califor-
nia College, 55 Fair. Drive, Costa Mesa, requesting an
exemption. Alice Angus, Senior. Planner., reviewed the
Agenda Reports dated March 6, 1992, and,March 9, 1992.
In response to a question from Council Member. Erickson
regarding Environmental Impact Report No. 1044, Page
168, No. 186, regarding deficient intersections,
Kimberly Brandt, Associate Planner., stated that the
final EIR would not change in terms of that one mitiga-
tion measure, the Facts and Findings refer to the actual
number, of intersections that are deficient; and the
Mitigation Measure Monitoring Program will focus on
those intersections.
i
Colm Macken, Vice President, Transpacific Development
Company, 2377 Crenshaw Boulevard, Torrance, stated that
regarding the South Coast Metro Center., a -dedication of
approximately 2.5 to 2.8 acres is required, with 540
units calculated at 35 dwelling units per acre on the
net area after the park dedication.
The Senior. Planner reviewed the existing development
at South Coast Plaza and Crystal Court in terns of
gross building area and gross leasable area. She
stated that the General Plan would allow an increase of
development in gross building area of approximately
250,000 square feet, and traffic associated with the
S• •SS
s � 249
requested increase could be accommodated on the plan
circulation system without causing a significant impact.
Terry Austin, Austin -Foust Associates, Incorporated,
2020 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana, spoke about the
recent study on the impact of adding an additional
250,000 square -feet, for a total addition of 500,000
square feet, to South Coast Plaza, and the conclusion
was that it would not add any mitigation measures, and
there was no increase in deficient intersections. The
City Attorney stated that this one site would not impact
the adequacy of the EIR which means that at this point,
it would be possible to certify the EIR and also approve
the project as it is presently proposed. Peter. Naghavi,
Transportation Services Manager., stated that staff had
not reviewed the Austin -Foust study since it was
received late last week.
ANNOUNCEMENT The Mayor announced that since the Council meeting would
not go beyond 12:00 a.m., Public Hearing 4, an ordinance
establishing development standards for small -lot, single-
family dwelling units, would be continued to the meeting
of April 6, 1992.
Malcolm Ross, C. J. Segerstrom and Sons, 3315 Fairview
Road, Costa Mesa, responded to a question from the
Mayor., by stating that staff asked Austin -Foust to run
a new model based on the decisions made on March 2,
1992. He stated there is also a model made by Linscott,
Law, and Greenspan, on the effects of the additional
250,000 square feet at South Coast Plaza.
Paul Wilkenson, representing Linscott, Law, and Green-
span, reported that their firm had initiated the Austin -
Foust traffic study, and they have determined from the
output that the net effect of the additional 250,000
square feet is that the average Intersection Capacity
Utilization (ICU) does not change in any grouping except
Group A where there is a one percent increase. He
clarified that all information in the study is the same
as in the EIR, the only difference in terms of input is
the square footage.
Heather. Somers, 313 Robin Hood Lane, Costa Mesa, asked
if the report that Mr.. Wilkenson had passed to Council
was legal testimony being presented for validation by
Council, and the City Attorney responded that Council is
entitled to believe whatever experts they so choose in
certifying the EIR.
Vice Mayor Genis stated she was not prepared to approve
something on the basis of information that had not been
reviewed by staff, and the City Attorney clarified that
there was enough information before Council to act this
evening, as there is nothing to prevent adopting the
resolutions as presently proposed by staff.
Council Member. Buffa questioned the traffic study on the
issue of changing the FAR whether the total traffic
impact in the South Coast Plaza area would be greater
than the numbers in the EIR, and Terry Austin confirmed
they would not.
MOTION A motion was made by Council Member. Erickson, seconded
Low Density Resi- by -Vice Mayor. Genis, and carried 5-0, to retain the Low
dential'Retained Density Residential designation for. the Bear. Street
for. Bear. -Street School site, declared surplus property by the Newport -
School Mesa School District, in accordance with the Agenda
Report dated March 9, 1992.
r�
cU X50
Motion Tabled
MOTION
Retained Designation
for. Metro Center.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION
Provided Desig-
nation for. Metro
Center. Project
The City Attorney pointed out.that the resolution certi-
fying the EIR should be adopted prior to the vote on the
General Plan; however., these votes could indicate intent.
A motion was made by Council Member. Erickson, seconded
by Council Member. Buffa, to adopt the resolution certi-
fying the EIR; however., after discussion, the motion was
tabled.
A motion was made by Council Member. Erickson, seconded
by Council Member. Humphrey, to retain the designation
of Urban Center. Commercial with a maximum residential
density of 20 units per acre for the residential
portion.
A motion was made by Council Member. Buffa, seconded by
Council Member. Humphrey, to direct staff to provide the
technically correct wording so that the General Plan
designation for. the Metro Center project site would
accommodate in concept residential development with a
density range from 25 to 35 units per acre with 25 units
per acre being the base density and the increase up to.
35 units per acre being earned by providing affordable
housing and a park on-site.
I
George Sakioka, Sakioka Farms, 14850 Sunflower. Avenue,
Costa Mesa, spoke regarding the Urban Center. Commercial
designation for his property which is located adjacent
to the Metro Center project, and Lot 1 parcel which is
designated High Density Residential.
AMENDED MOTION Council Member. Buffa amended the substitute motion,
Changed General seconded by Mayor. Hornbuckle, to add, using as much as
Plan Designations possible the same General Plan designations as was done
for. Sakioka Site on Mr.. Sakioka's Lot 1, regarding the 25 to 35 units to
the acre was defined.
Vice Mayor. Genis indicated that the text regarding high
density residential should indicate that for the density
range of 25 to 35 units per acre, the 35 units per acre
includes any density bonuses. Staff indicated that this
clarification will be made to the text.
AMENDED MOTION
Council Member. Buffa amended the amended substitute
Failed to Carry
motion, seconded by Mayor. Hornbuckle, to clarify the
concept of 25 to 35 units earned would apply specifi-
cally to the Metro Center project site. The amended
amended substitute motion failed to carry 3-2, Council
Members Genis, Humphrey, and Erickson voting no.
MOTION
On motion by Council Member. Erickson, seconded by
Country Club
Council Member. Humphrey, and carried 5-0, staff was
Drive Study
directed to initiate a study to reevaluate the designa-
Author. i zed
tion of Country Club Dr. ive .
MOTION
i
A motion was made by Vice Mayor. Genis, seconded by
South Coast Plaza
Council Member. Humphrey, to adopt the FARs as proposed
FAR
in the Agenda Report dated March 9, 1992, which would
allow for. 2.5 million square feet at South Coast Plaza.
Malcolm Ross, C. J. Segerstrom and Sons, 3315 Fairview
Road, Costa Mesa, stated that if the traffic issue is
delaying the decision on the additional 250,000 square
feet, they will accept the trip budget for. the 2.5
million square feet if the FAR can be increased to 0.65.
He reported that the calculations for trip generation at
South Coast Plaza are actually overstated in the traffic
study.
Paul Wilkenson, Linscott, Law, and Greenspan, reviewed
the traffic study and stated that the calculated genera-
tion rates for all but one driveway in the South Coast
Plaza area for existing conditions is 1.8 peak hour trip
ends per. 1,000 square feet which means traffic would
have to grow by 50 to 75 percent to achieve the esti-
mated 2 to 3 peak hour trip ends per. 1,000 square feet.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION A substitute motion was made by Council Member Erickson,
South Coast Plaza seconded by Council Member. Buffa, to approve an FAR of
.652 FAR Approved 0.652 for South Coast Plaza, and the trip generation
shall not exceed the trip generation correspondent to
2.5 million square feet on an FAR of 0.60. The motion
carried 4-1, Vice Mayor. Genis voting no.
Vice Mayor. Genis requested a report from staff regarding
the trip rates at South Coast Plaza.
MOTION On motion by Council Member. Erickson, seconded by Vice
Resolution 92-26 Mayor Genis, Resolution 92-26, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
Adopted COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFY-
ING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 1044 FOR THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA 1990 GENERAL PLAN, was adopted by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Humphrey, Erickson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
MOTION On motion by Council Member Erickson, seconded by
Resolution 92-27 Council Member. Humphrey, Resolution 92-27, A RESOLUTION
Adopted OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFOR-
NIA, ADOPTING THE CITY OF COSTA MESA 1990 GENERAL PLAN;
changing Agenda Report Exhibit A, Page 1, Project.
Description, change to read, "Regional Commercial with a
FAR of 0.652 applied to South Coast Plaza and a trip
budget of 2,300 AM peak hour trips, and 8,350 PM peak
hour trips", with the remainder of the sentence regard-
ing Crystal Court to remain the same; and Page 2, prior
to the second to the last bullet, add, "Retain the Low
Density Residential land use designation for. the Bear.
Street School Site"; Southern California College shall
be allowed to complete their current plans and return to
Council for. a General Plan Amendment; Page 384 of the
General Plan, No. 4, line 3, incorporate the change,
"total trip budget of all parcels involved if each were
developed independently..."; Page 384, Effective Trip
Generation, second line, replace "circulation systems"
with "public streets"; and Page 394, Urban Center. Com-
mercial, third paragraph, line 10, Urban Center. FARs,
adding "and trip rates"; Page 313, adding Policy 187A to
set a limit for failure of the two potentially deficient
Intersections. The motion carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa,
Humphrey, Erickson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
MOTION On motion by Council Member. Erickson, seconded by
Continued to Council Member. Buffa, and carried 5-0, the following
April 6, 1992 Public Hearing Nos. 3, 4, and 5, were continued to the
meeting of April 6, 1992:
Continued from the meeting of February 18, 1992,
General Plan Amendment GP -92-01, City of Costa Mesa,
to incorporate a Growth Management Element as required
by the revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Manage-
ment Ordinance (Measure M).
252
Ordinance establishing development standards for small
lot, single-family dwelling units and minor technical
amendments to the condominium ordinance. Environ-
mental Determination: Negative Declaration.
Final Draft of Source Reduction and Recycling Element
and the Household Hazardous Waste Element.
OLD BUSINESS
On motion by Council Member. Erickson, seconded by
Rezone Petition
Council Member. Humphrey, and carried 5-0, Rezone Peti-
R-91-02, Kashani
tion R-91-02, Mike Kashani, 180 Newport Center. Drive,
Suite 180, Newport Beach, authorized agent for. Frank
MOTION
Eisendrath, 103 Kings Place, Newport Beach, to change
Withdrawn
the zoning at 1928 Maple Avenue from R2 to R3, was with-
drawn.
.
CITY ATTORNEY'S
The City Attorney requested a closed session pursuant
REPORTS
to Goverment Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss the
Bergeron; O'Neil;
following matters: Bergeron v. City of Costa Mesa, et
and Smith
al; Thomas Charles O'Neil, et al. v. City of Costa
Mesa; and Joseph Smith v. City of Costa Mesa. The Mayor
announced that closed session would be held after close
of regular. business.
COUNCIL MEMBER
Council Member. Erickson stated that the Transportation
COMMENTS
Study Group is currently reviewing the scope of work
Transportation
for deletion of the bridges, including 19th Street, and
Study Group
there is a meeting of the group on Thursday evening,
March 20, 1992.
General Plan Council Member. Humphrey thanked staff for their efforts
on the General Plan.
South Coast Plaza Vice Mayor. Genis expressed concern regarding the South
Coast Plaza change, and stated she hoped it would work
AQMD Hearings out well. She also'stated that the Air. Quality Manage-
ment District, AQMD, over the next month or so would be
holding a series of hearings, specifically oriented
towards small businesses.
Archive Corporation Mayor. Hornbuckle thanked Council Member. Erickson for. the
Letter letter he sent to the Chief Financial Officer of Archive
.Corporation.
ADJOURNMENT TO At 12:10 a.m., the Mayor adjourned the meeting to a
CLOSED SESSION closed session in the first floor. Conference Room to
discuss the three items previously announced by the City
Attorney.
MEETING RECONVENED The Mayor reconvened the meeting at 12:35 a.m. The
following action was taken:
Bergeron v. By a vote of 5-0, the City Attorney was authorized to
City of Costa Mesa settle in the matter. of Bergeron v. City of Costa Mesa,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 59-39-20, in an
MOTION amount not to exceed $750,000.00, which sum is to be
Settlement Approved taken out of the City Reserve Fund.
O'Neil, et al. v. By a vote of 5-0, the settlement offer as outlined in
City of Costa Mesa the City Attorney's confidential memorandum dated March
12, 1992, was rejected, regarding Thomas Charles O'Neil,
MOTION et al., v. City of Costa Mesa, United States District
Settlement Rejected Court Case No. SACV 91-670AHS (RWRX).
Smith v. City of By a vote of 5-0, the settlement offer, was accepted as
Costa Mesa detailed in the City Attorneys confidential memorandum
dated March 11, 1992, regarding Joseph Smith v. City of
MOTION Costa Mesa, United States District Court Case No. SACV
Settlement Approved 91-24-GLT (RWRX).
1
AWOURNMENT The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 12:40 a.m.
—J]La� A64"J�
Mayor oy the City of Costa Mesa
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of Costa esa
P253