Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/02/1992 - City CouncilREGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF COSTA MESA NOVEMBER 2, 1992 The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California, met in regular session November 2, 1992, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa. The meeting was called to order by the Mayor, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, and invocation by Chaplain Lloyd Sellers, Hoag Memorial Hospital -Presbyterian. ROLL CALL I Council Members Present: I Council Members Absent: Mayor Mary Hornbuckle Vice Mayor Sandra Genis Council Member Peter Buffa Council Member Jay Humphrey Council Member Joe Erickson None Officials Present: City Manager Allan Roeder City Attorney Thomas Kathe Deputy City Manager/Development Services Donald Lamm Public Services Director William Morris City Clerk Eileen Phinney MINUTES On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member October 19 and 26, Humphrey, and carried 5-0, the minutes of the regular meeting of 1992 October 19, 1992, and the special meeting of October 26, 1992, 1 were approved as distributed. ORDINANCES ORAL COMMUNI- CATIONS City Budget Access for the Handicapped A motion was made by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member Humphrey, and carried 5-0, to read all ordinances by title only. Carey Ward, 126 East 19th Street, Costa Mesa, asserted that the City Council has been using the reserve account to balance the City Budget. It was his understanding that reserve funds have been reduced from $32 million to $14.7 million, and contended that the problem seems to be the high cost of salaries which he estimated to be over 70 percent of the operating budget. The City Manager agreed that costs must be reduced, and reported that 50 percent of the budget is for public safety, such as police and fire. Vice Mayor Genis commented that when she became a Council Member four years ago, she believed the reserve was only $10 or $11 million, and could not recollect that the account had ever been as high as $32 million. The City Manager confirmed that it had never been that high. He explained that a certain dollar amount is taken from each year's revenues and placed in the reserve account, and that this money can only be used for extreme emergencies. I Bil Garvin, 1092 San Pablo Circle, Costa Mesa, referred to several issues discussed at the last Council meeting regarding access far the handicapped detailed on Page 11 of the minutes for October`: -19, 1992, and felt they had not been adequately addressed: :re -moving the barrier which blocks the ramp at 19th Street/Newport. Boulevard; contract with the MacIntosh Center; and an explartadon of a letter from Rick Pickering, Assistant to the City Manager, regarding the 1 J City Hall building being in compliance with Federal standards. He asked for any information available regarding the Macintosh agree- ment. Mr. Garvin stated that the Attorney General is in Costa Mesa because he could find no other way to have City Hall brought up to applicable standards. Council Member Humphrey reported that Mr. Garvin gave him a copy of an Access Survey Form . which he received in Sacramento, and gave it to the Deputy City Manager/Development Services for use in evaluating City buildings. Business Burglaries Greg Scafferty, owner of 'A-1 Glass Door Window and Mirror Company, 2204 Newport Boulevard, Costa Mesa, thanked the Deputy City Manager/Development Services for his assistance relating to three burglaries at his place of business. Soffer Comments Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, commented on several issues: (1) The City's sponsoring the "Shop Costa Mesa" program, but purchasing its police vehicles outside the City because the law mandates that the City must purchase from the lowest responsible bidder, and asserting that, to the contrary, the City failed to follow the law requiring it to sell items to the highest bidder; (2) Mr. Garvin's having to constantly pursue the issue of adequate access for the handicapped; (3) basing parking requirements on the trip ends generated by a business; (4) the City's losing building permit files; (5) the restaurant and sign ordinances being anti -business; and (6) a claim that the City is spending more money than it receives. The City Manager refuted Mr. Soffer's claim that the City does not operate within its budget. ANNOUNCEMENT Mayor Hornbuckle announced that requests have been received to Requests for continue the following items: Public Hearing No. 1, Single -Room Continuances Occupancy project at 2450 Newport Boulevard; Public Hearing No. 2, Zoning ' Action ZA-92-03, for a Conditional Use Permit at 1548 Adams Avenue; and Public Hearing No. 5, Planning Action PA -92- 72, for a Planned Signing Program at 3033 Bristol Street. CONSENT The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar: CALENDAR Item 2, Setting a public hearing for Rezone Petition R-92-06, to • rezone sites within Planning Area No. 4; and Item 8, Agreement with The Keith Companies for work at Fairview Park. On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member Humphrey, the remaining Consent Calendar items were approved in one motion by the following roll call vote: AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa, Humphrey, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None READING FOLDER On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member Humphrey, and carried 5-0, the following Reading Folder items were received and processed: Claims Claims received by the City Clerk: Lucia Hendricks; Ethelyn Johann; Inge Linhardt; Michael R. Miller; Mary Ann Ready; and Ir Jaime Sierra. MOTION/Warrant On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member 1531 and Payroll Humphrey, Warrant Resolution 1531 for $1,091,865.65, and Payroll 9221 Approved 9221 for $1,173,891.56 were approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa, Humphrey, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE I Bids received for Installation of Flashing Beacons on Baker Street ACTIONS ! at Andros Street/Labrador Drive, Project No. 92-12, are on file in jthe City Clerk's office. On motion by Council Member Buffa, Flashing Beacons on seconded by Council Member Humphrey, the contract was awarded Baker at Andros/ I to Daniel R. Feilmeier, doing business. as Building Energy Labrador Consultants, 1320 West Tefft Street, Nipomo, for $8,820.00. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: MOTION AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa, Awarded to Building Humphrey, Erickson Energy Consultants NOES: None Final Map for Tract .14362 Chu/Chu/Kao MOTION Map Approved Agreement with ABC Service to Videotape Storm Drains MOTION Agreement Approved Agreement with CALTRANS for Maintenance of I-405 Freeway MOTION Agreement Approved; Resolution 92-89 Adopted ABSENT: None The Final Map was presented for Tract No. 14362 located at 426 Victoria Street, one lot, 0.411 -acre, for condominium purposes; Hsing-Chuan Chu, Chen-Chie Chu, and San Tou Kao, developers, 18458 Santa Veronica Circle, Fountain Valley. A motion was made by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member Humphrey, and carried 5-0, approving the map; accepting on behalf of the public the dedication of Victoria Street for street and highway purposes; also accepting on behalf of the City the ingress/egress easement over Lot "A" for emergency and security vehicle purposes as shown on the map; approving the map pursuant to the provisions of Section 66436(a)(3)(A) of the Subdivision Map Act; and authorizing the City Clerk to sign said map on behalf of the City. The Public Services Director recommended approval of an agreement with ABC Service, 204 - 23rd Street, Sacramento, for $50,272.56, to videotape storm drains to identify potential and/or existing pipe problems and locations of suspected pollutant discharges. On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member Humphrey, the agreement was approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk were authorized to sign on behalf of the City. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa, Humphrey, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None The Public Services Director recommended approval of an agreement with the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), 2501 Pullman Street, Santa Ana, for maintenance of the I-405 (San Diego) Freeway from Bristol Street to Harbor Boulevard; and recommended adoption of a resolution approving the subject agreement. A motion was made by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member Humphrey, to approve the agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign on behalf of the City; and to adopt Resolution 92-89, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FREEWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF COSTA MESA AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS- PORTATION (CALTRANS). The motion carried by the following j roll call vote: 1 1 _ tY AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa, Humphrey, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None R-92-06 Item 2 on the Consent Calendar was presented: Rezone Petition City of Costa Mesa R-92-069 City of Costa Mesa, to rezone sites within Planning Area No. 4 to be consistent with the 1990 General Plan. Environmental Determination: Environmental Impact Report No. 1044 adopted for the 1990 General Plan. Price Shapiro, 338 Ogle Street, Costa Mesa, representing the Mesa del Mar Apartment Owners Association, spoke in opposition to the request, claiming that the rezone would reduce apartment property values by 25 percent. In response to a question from Vice Mayor Genis, Mr. Shapiro stated that the general location of the apartment properties are on Valencia Street, Mission Drive, El Camino Drive, La Salle Avenue, and Mendoza Drive. Mayor Hornbuckle reported that there is some interest on the Council to refer this item back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration because some Council Members have concerns about a few of the changes. Vice Mayor Genis was concerned with Sites A and IL She noted that Site A is proposed to be rezoned R1, yet there are condominium developments in that area. She felt the Planned Development (PD) zone would be more -appropriate. In regard to Site H, the Vice Mayor commented that the site contains an office complex at El Camino and Mendoza Drives and she did not believe Council intended to rezone this property to residential. She felt the intent was to ensure that the existing use did not become more intense. Vice Mayor Genis suggested a clean-up amendment to the General Plan for Site II. Carey Ward, 126 East 19th Street, Costa Mesa, spoke against the proposal to down -zone apartment sites, and commented that the 1990 General Plan greatly reduces the value of these properties. Roy Pizarek, 1923 Whittier Avenue, Costa Mesa, commented that the citizens of Costa Mesa had two years to provide input for the General Plan, and most residents were in favor of stopping high density development. MOTION/Referred A motion was made by Council Member Humphrey, seconded by Back to Planning Council Member Erickson, to refer this item back to the Planning Commission Commission for further changes, and to be brought back to Council for a public hearing to be held at a future date. At the AMENDED recommendation of the Deputy City Manager/Development Services, MOTION Council Member Humphrey amended his motion by adding an Gave Instructions instruction to the Planning Commission to make recommendations to the Planning to Council, not completely based on the General Plan, but based on Commission that which they feel would be appropriate zoning and possible General Plan amendments. Vice Mayor Genis reiterated her concerns about Site A. The amended motion was seconded by Council Member Erickson, and carried 5-0. Agreement with The Item 8 on the Consent Calendar was presented: An agreement with Keith Companies The Keith Companies, 2995 Red Hill Avenue, Costa Mesa, for $107,530.00, to conduct an archaeological study and prepare grading plans for Fairview Park. n= 5 Archaeological i Council Member Erickson requested that this item be delayed for a Study and Grading short while in order to investigate the possibility of working with a Plans for Fairview local university or college to do the archaeological study. The City Park Manager preferred having this item removed from the Agenda at this time, to be brought back after he has had the opportunity to contact various universities. He mentioned that California State University at Long Beach has been very active and involved at the site, and felt that Council Member Erickson's recommendation was worthwhile Removed from the investigating. In accordance with the City Manager's suggestion, Agenda Mayor Hornbuckle removed this item from the Agenda. PUBLIC HEARING The City Clerk announced the joint public hearing with the Costa Butler-O'Bryon SRO Mesa Redevelopment Agency, continued from the meeting of October 19, 1992, for the Butler-O'Bryon Single -Room Occupancy (SRO) Hotel at 2450 Newport Boulevard. Council Member Buffa announced that he would abstain from voting on this item. Anne Shereshevsky, 2152 Elden Avenue, Costa Mesa, addressed this item under Oral Communications, and supported SRO housing for the working poor. MOTION On motion by Council Member Erickson, seconded by Vice Mayor Continued to Genis, and carried 4-0, Council Member Buffa abstaining, the public November 16, 1992 hearing was continued to November 16, 1992, as requested by staff. PUBLIC HEARING I The City Clerk announced the public hearing, continued from the Appeal of ZA-92-03 meeting of September 8, 1992, to consider an appeal of the Planning Meurs/Smart SMR of i Commission's denial of Zoning Action ZA-92-03 from Eric M. California Meurs, Smart SMR of California, Incorporated, 1335 South Acacia Avenue, Fullerton, for a Conditional Use Permit to install an 80 -foot antenna, cabling, and electrical equipment at 1548 Adams Avenue in a C 1 zone. Environmental Determination: Exempt. A letter was received from Mr. Meurs requesting a one-month continuance. i Franklin Cole, 2482 Fairview Way, Costa Mesa, commented that questions and answers on biological effects and potential hazards of radio frequency radiation is contained in the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) Bulletin dated January, 1989, and is more current than the information contained in the Agenda Report dated October 22, 1992. He reported that the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors recently limited the amount of emissions for a cellular tower, and set emission standards for future towers. Mr. Cole felt that the applicant should provide more information on this project, and contended that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be prepared. MOTION On motion by Council Member Erickson, seconded by Council Continued to Member Humphrey, and carried 5-0, the public hearing was December 7, 1992 continued to December 7, 1992, and staff was directed to advise the applicant that this shall be the last continuance allowed, and the item will be acted upon at the December 7 meeting. PUBLIC HEARING The City Clerk announced the public hearing, continued from the Appeal from Siler of meeting of October 5, 1992, to consider an application from Paul J. PA -92-56 (RA -92-10) Barba, Attorney at Law, 17291 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 315, Tustin, Pope Family Trust representing Rosemary Siler, 13571 Cloudesly Drive, San Diego, appealing the Planning Commission's approval of Planning Action PA -92-56, Redevelopment Action RA -92-10, Linda Horton, authorized agent for Pope Family Trust, 4201 Long Beach Boulevard, No. 306, Long Beach, for Conditional Use Permits for a restaurant with seating for more than 12 in a commercial building with full alcoholic beverage_ service, located within 200 feet of a residential zone; and deviation from shared parking requirements, for property at 145 East 19th Street, Suite B-4, in a CL -P zone. Environmental Determination: Exempt. The Deputy City Manager/Development Services summarized the Agenda Report dated October 22, 1992, and showed the site plan on the overhead screen. He indicated the parking spaces to be used by the restaurant, and explained that the center of the parking lot is jointly owned by the Mesa Theater owner, Rosemary Siler, and the shopping center owner, Pope Family Trust. The Deputy City Manager stated that the disagreement regarding the parking lot is a civil matter and the City cannot intervene. Paul Barba, representing Rosemary Siler, reported that the Pope Family indicated that the restaurant will be in existence only until December 31, 1993; however; he felt an agreement should be required between Siler, Pope, and the tenant, in which Pope and the tenant waive any right to extending the Conditional Use Permit beyond the aforementioned date so that ongoing negotiations for sale of the property by Ms. Siler will not be jeopardized. Patrick Walsh, 5 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, representing the Pope Family Trust, commented that the parking issues were fully and thoroughly aired at the Planning Commission meeting; therefore, there is no basis for the appeal. He stated that the Conditions of Approval for the Conditional Use Permit require more parking by restriping the lot; therefore, the increased use will be matched by increased parking spaces. In conclusion, Mr. Walsh pointed out that his client is merely requesting this use until the end of 1993 as shown in the Conditional Use Permit. There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the public hearing. MOTION/Upheld A motion was made by Council Member Erickson, seconded by Approval by the Vice Mayor Genis, and carried 5-0, to uphold the Planning Planning Commission Commission's approval of the application. PUBLIC HEARING The City Clerk presented a request for Council review of a proposed New Administration two-story, 26,170 -square -foot administration building at 3180 Building for John Airway Avenue for John Wayne Airport operations. The Affidavit Wayne Airport of Publication is on file in the City Clerk's office. No communi- cations were received. The Deputy City Manager/Development Services summarized the Agenda Report of October 21, 1992, stating that since the site is within the City limits and the building will be used for admin- istrating ,John Wayne Airport operations, the Public Utilities Code (PUC) requires that the City Council approve or deny the land use plan. He reported that the Planning Commission and staff believe that the plan complies with the General Plan and they recommended approval. There being no speakers, the Mayor closed the public hearing. ,MOTION A motion was made by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Building Approved Member Erickson, to approve the proposed building. Considerable discussion ensued regarding the trip rate for the project, and the possibility of the use being expanded and thereby generating additional traffic. AMENDED MOTION/Added Requirement for a Land Use Restriction Responding to Council Member Erickson's suggestion of entering into an agreement to limit the use of the building, Alan Murphy, j Manager of Facilities for John Wayne Airport, stated that the PUC provides that if there were'a proposal to change the use of the site, the request must be brought before the City Council. Mr. Murphy agreed to a land use restriction and reiterated that the City is protected by the PUC. At the request of Council Member Erickson, Council Member Buffa amended his motion by adding a condition requiring a land -use restriction. Brief discussion ensued regarding the appropriate land - use designation for the site. The amended motion was seconded by j Council Member Erickson, and carried 5-0. Council Member Erickson commented that it would be appreciated if Mr. Murphy would pass the word along to the people at the County studying the City's proposal to delete the river crossings and East 19th Street widening, about the City's cooperating with the County by approving this building. PUBLIC HEARING On motion by Vice Mayor Genis, seconded by Council Member Appeal of PA -92-72 Humphrey, and carried 5-0, the following item was continued to Bailey November 16, 1992: Appeal of the Planning Commission's Conditions of Approval for Planning Action PA -92-72 from Donald MOTION or Marilyn Bailey, 2811 East Katella Avenue, No. 200, Orange, for Continued to ; a Planned Signing Program to allow two double-faced tenant November 16, 1992 ; identification ground signs with five tenant panels per side, located i at 3033 Bristol Street in a C1 zone. Environmental Determination: Exempt. The Affidavit of Mailing is on file in the Clerk's Office. PUBLIC HEARING Abandonment of Property at 1893 Orange Avenue The City Clerk announced that this was the time and place set for the public hearing to consider the abandonment of 10 feet of property at 1893 Orange Ave. The Affidavits of Publishing and Posting are on file in the City Clerk's office. Communications were received from The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Post Office Box 54153, Terminal Annex, Los Angeles, and Southern California Gas Company, Post Office Box 3334, Anaheim, neither of whom had any objections to the abandonment. The Public Services Director gave a summary of the Agenda Report dated October 14, 1992, and recommended vacating the 10 feet of land since it is no longer needed by the City for Orange Avenue improvements. There being no speakers, the Mayor closed the public hearing. i MOTION On motion by Council Member Humphrey, seconded by Council Resolution 92-90 Member Erickson, Resolution 92-90, A RESOLUTION OF THE Adopted CITY COUNCIL 'OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION OF 10 FEET OF PROPERTY AT 1893 ORANGE AVENUE, was adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa, Humphrey, Erickson j NOES: None ABSENT: None OLD BUSINESS The City Clerk presented from the meeting of October 19, 1992, Towing Services City Attorney's Report No. 92-65 and a proposed ordinance and Charges amending Sections 9-271, 9-279, 9-282, 9-283, and 9-284 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code relating to towing services and charges. 1 The.City Attorney reported that further research is necessary on the cruise account towing, and recommended giving first reading to the ordinance with deletion of Sections 9-271(f) and 9-279(e). Jody Campbell, 337 Ramona Place, Costa Mesa, representing Rushco Enterprises, owner and operator of Harbor Towing, commended City staff for working with the towing companies in resolving some issues in the ordinance that were a concern. Robert Eger, owner of Doctor Tow and Automotive Services, 114 East 16th Street, Costa Mesa, addressed an insurance requirement in Section 9-282 of the ordinance which states that a towing company's insurance shall be executed by a company duly licensed under the laws of the State of California to be an insurance business. Mr. Eger claimed that this requirement would quadruple his insurance costs and drive him out of business. The City Attorney explained that the new insurance provision provides greater protection to the public and that he was uncomfortable with allowing off -shore insurance companies to provide coverage .because there is no recourse for the insured if the company closes its doors. Police Captain Dave Brooks reported that there is an.insurance pool to protect policy holders if California - licensed companies go out of business. The City Manager suggested allowing Mr. Eger to operate with his existing policy; however, upon expiration, require that he provide insurance from a duly licensed California insurance company. MOTION A motion was made by Council Member Humphrey, seconded by Ordinance 92-23 Council Member Erickson, to give first reading to Ordinance 92-23, Given First Reading AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 9-2711 9-279, 9-2829 9-283, AND 9-284 OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TOW SERVICES AND CHARGES, deleting Sections 9-271(f) and 9-279(e); and stipulating that Mr. Eger be allowed to continue to operate under his existing insurance policy for one year or until its expiration, whichever comes first. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa, Humphrey, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None RECESS The Mayor declared a recess a 8:35 p.m., and the meeting reconvened at 8:50 p.m. NEW BUSINESS The City Clerk presented an ordinance amending Chapter II of Title 1991 Uniform Fire 7 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code to adopt the 1991 Uniform Fire Code Code and making certain, amendments thereto. The City Manager reported that the ordinance was prepared because of the necessity to update the Fire Code periodically. Tom Macduff, Costa Mesa Fire Marshal, stated that adoption of the 1991 Uniform Fire Code is necessary for consistency with the State and compatibility with the 1991 Uniform Building Code. MOTION On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member Ordinance 92-24 Erickson, Ordinance 92-24, AN ORDINANCE OF THE -CITY Given First Reading COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER II OF TITLE 7 OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT THE 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO, was given first reading and passed to second reading, by the following roll call vote: j AYES: Hornbuckle, Genis, Buffa, Humphrey, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None CITY ATTORNEY The City Attorney requested a closed session pursuant to REPORT Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss City of Costa Mesa Request for Closed v. BD Inns, et al., Harbor Municipal Court Case No. 92C2720. Session; City v. Mayor Hornbuckle announced that closed session would be held BD Inns, et al. after completion of regular business. CITY MANAGER REPORTS Irvine Business Complex Joint Use Agreement with School District COUNCIL COMMENTS Canyon Park Clean-up Day Access for the Handicapped General Election ADJOURNMENT TO CLOSED SESSION MEETING RECONVENED MOTION/Accepted Settlement Offer from BD Inns ADJOURNMENT The City Manager reported that a letter was received from the City of Irvine in response to the City of Costa Mesa's letter expressing concerns about the Irvine Business Center. He stated that the Irvine City Council has taken action on the General Plan Amendment for the Center; however, the Irvine City Manager advised that they will meet with our staff this week to introduce an agreement which guarantees the City of Costa Mesa full compensation to mitigate any traffic impacts caused by their approval for intersection roadway improvements required in Costa Mesa. The City Manager reported on the progress of the Joint Use Agreement with the Newport -Mesa Unified School District and indicated the final draft should be completed shortly. Council Member Erickson announced that Canyon Park Clean-up Day is being held on Saturday, November 7, 1992, at 8:00 a.m. Council Member Humphrey requested the City Attorney or Deputy City Manager/Development Services to start preparing a monthly update on access for the handicapped. Council urged members of the community to vote in the General I Election on Tuesday, November 3, 1992. At 9:00 p.m., the Mayor adjourned the meeting to a closed session in the first floor Conference Room to discuss City v. BD Inn, et al. The meeting was reconvened at 9:05 p.m., and the action taken during closed session was announced. By a vote of 5-0, Council authorized acceptance of a settlement offer in the case of City of Costa Mesa v. BD Inns, et al., Harbor Municipal Court Case No. 92C2720. The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Mayor Ithe City of Costa Mesa ATTEST: ity Clerk of the City of Costa Mes i