Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/01/1993 - City Council116 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF COSTA MESA MARCH 1, 1993 The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California, met in regular session March 1, 1993, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa. The meeting was called to order by the Mayor, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, and invocation by Pastor Bruce Jeske, Christ Lutheran Church. ROLL CALL Council Members Present: Mayor Sandra Genis Vice Mayor Jay Humphrey Council Member Mary Hornbuckle Council Member Peter Buffa Council Member Joe Erickson Council Members Absent: None Officials Present: City Manager Allan Roeder City Attorney Thomas Kathe Deputy City Manager/Development Services Donald Lamm Public Services Director William Morris City Clerk Eileen Phinney MINUTES On motion by Council Member Humphrey, seconded by Council February 16, 1993 Member Buffa, and carried 5-0, the minutes of the February 16, 1993, meeting were approved. ORDINANCES A motion was made by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Council Member Hornbuckle, and carried 5-0, to read all ordinances by title only. ORAL COMMUNI- Andrew Whitney, 1189 Augusta Street, Costa Mesa, spoke about the CATIONS ongoing problem with his neighbor who has threatened his life because of Mr. Whitney's complaints about the constant noise Neighborhood Noise created by the neighbor's playing basketball adjacent to his property. Problems He reported that the most recent incident was that his neighbor assaulted him, and Mr. Whitney feared for his safety. County Work Janice Davidson, 1982 Arnold Avenue, Costa Mesa, referred to the Furlough Program Orange County work furlough facility proposed for the west side of Costa Mesa, and asked to be notified when the County files its application for a Conditional Use Permit. The City Manager responded that all persons who have requested notification will be provided with that information. Brief discussion was held regarding the per diem charges assessed to the residents of the facility and whether taxpayers' money will be used to subsidize those who cannot afford to pay.: The City Manager suggested asking that question during the hearing for the Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Davidson was concerned that the furlough facility would house high risk inmates; asserted that adequate parking is not available; and the number of staff members proposed for the -facility is insufficient. Tree Removal John DeWitt, 2000 :Balearic Drive' Costa=Mesa, member of the Program; Graffiti; Parks, Recreation Facilities ah'd`Parkways Commission, reported that and Bike Lanes the Commission has reviewed the -Parks Master Plan, Streetscape + , t Guidelines,. Median Development Guidelines, and the Tree Ordinance. He stated that these issues are now being reviewed by the Community Services Director, and wanted to make sure that they would be .brought to Council's attention. He mentioned that in the last week alone, there has been random tree removal in the landscaped setback ,areas on Mesa Verde Drive East, Adams Avenue, and Red Hill Avenue, and that the sycamores at Harbor Boulevard and Fair Drive are constantly being trimmed back. He recommended implementation of landscape conditions which would be more self-explanatory and binding. Mr. DeWitt commented that the City is spending- approximately $37,000.00 annually to remove graffiti from walls, and proposed that vines be planted at free- standing walls. Mr. DeWitt reported that the Commission wants to be involved in the development of a good bike lane system. Work Furlough John Feeney, 11541 Dorset Lane, Costa Mesa, co -coordinator of the Program Citizens Anti-CrimTask Force, commended the City Council, City Manager, and staff for obtaining detailed information on the satellite jail'facility being proposed by the County for a Costa Mesa location. Mr. Feeney felt a comment by County Supervisor Wieder that "the residents of this City need to be educated" was a real display of arrogance on her part, and felt the County lied to the City in that it indicated that the facility would house people arrested for minor violations. He commented on information published by the County which indicates that 24 percent of the people currently in this program were arrested for drug offenses, assault and battery, etc. Mr. Feeney noted that the facility is supposed to be managed by the Orange County Youth and Family Services, a social services agency, which he felt was an inappropriate jurisdiction for the work furlough program. Work Furlough Don O'Neal, 1822 Tanager Drive, Costa Mesa, agreed with the Program; "Hate previous speakers who addressed the County furlough facility. He Crime" in Laguna spoke about a letter which was written to the Laguna Beach City Beach; Community Council by Council Member Hornbuckle regarding the man who was Quilt severely beaten in Laguna Beach. He believed it would have been more appropriate to send the letter to. the victim and his family. It was his opinion that the special meeting called by the Laguna Beach City Council was a "publicity stunt". Mr. O'Neal asked for information on the community quilt which is being assembled by the Human Relations Committee. Council Member Hornbuckle explained that any member of the community can submit a square on any theme except that which is political. She reported that after the quilt has been completed, it may be"d1isplayed at City Hall or in other public buildings.. Soffer Comments Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, asserted that the people on the County work furlough program are not allowed to stop anywhere between their jobs and the facility without permission from, their, parole.officers. He announced that he served time in jail because, . he did not have appropriate building permits for his property, and referred to a list he submitted to staff containing locations of 100 or more houses that did not have building permits on file. Mr. Soffer stated he received a letter from the Assistant Development Services Director/Building indicating that the majority of those houses had appropriate permits; however, he was never advised of the status of the remainder of those properties. The City Manager stated that a report would be available within two weeks. CONSENT The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar: CALENDAR Item 6, Resolution protesting State cutbacks affecting local 1ZS governments; Item 7, Resolution supporting Federal legislation to abolish unfunded Federal mandates; Item 8, Resolution supporting submittal to obtain Measure "M" funds for improvement projects in Growth Management Area No. 8; and Item 9, Change Order No. 1 to the contract with SGPA Architecture and Planning for handicap access compliance at the Civic Center. On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Vice Mayor Humphrey, the remaining Consent Calendar items were approved in one motion by the following roll call vote: AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None WRITTEN On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Vice Mayor COMMUNICATION Humphrey, Resolution 93-9, A . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALI- Records Destruction FORNIA, AUTHORIZING RECORDS DESTRUCTION FOR for Finance Depart- THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF COSTA ment MESA PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 75-60, was adopted by the following roll call vote: MOTION AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Resolution 93-9 Buffa, Erickson Adopted NOES: None ABSENT: None READING FOLDER On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Vice Mayor Humphrey, and carried 5-0, the following Reading Folder items were received and processed: Claims Claims received by the City Clerk: John Doe (confidentiality demanded due to minor child involved - Welfare & Institutions Code Section 827); and Natalie Fogarty. Alcoholic Alcoholic Beverage Licenses for which parking has been approved Beverage by the Planning Staff: Aries Enterprises, Incorporated, doing Licenses business at 428 East 17th Street; Kyotaru Hawaii Corporation, doing business as The Cafe on Bristol, 3099 South Bristol Street; and La Salsa Holding Company, doing business at 1870-A Harbor Boulevard, Suite 202. Public Utilities Notice from the Public Utilities Commission that Southern Commission California Edison Company filed Application No. 93-02-010 on February 2, 1993, to adjust recovery of nuclear plant investments by an additional capital recovery amount and related relief. Notice from Southern California Gas Company advising that it filed Application No. 93-02-007 on February 1, 1993, with the Public Utilities Commission to adjust customer rates. SET FOR PUBLIC On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Vice Mayor HEARING Humphrey, and carried 5-0, a resolution establishing a fee of Female Arrestees $125.00 per day for female arrestees housed at the City of MOTION/Hearing Huntington Beach jail, was set for public hearing on March 15, Set March 15, 1993 1993, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall. MOTION On motion by Council Member Buffa, seconded by Vice Mayor Warrant 1540 and Humphrey, Warrant Resolution 1540, funding City operating Payroll 9303 expenses in the amount of $878,300.64; and Payroll 9303 for Approved $1,162,977.32, were approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT:, None ' ADMINISTRATIVE Bids received `for construction of the Cadillac Avenue Bike Trail ACTIONS from the Santa Ana River to Cadillac Avenue, Project No. 93-02, are on file. in the City Clerk's office. On motion by Council Cadillac Avenue Bike Member Buffa; seconded by Vice Mayor Humphrey, the contract Trail was awarded to Bopark Enterprises, Incorporated, 8560 Vineyard Avenue, Suite 103, Rancho Cucamonga, for $56,682.82 (Alternate MOTION "B"). The motion carried by the following roll call vote: Awarded to Bopark AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Enterprises Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None Notice 'of Completion Installation of Flashing Beacons on Baker Street at Andros Flashing Beacons on Street/Labrador Drive, Project No. 92-12, was completed on Baker Street, Project February 9, 1993, to the satisfaction of the Public Services Director No. 92-12, Completed by Daniel R. Feilmeier, doing business as Building Energy by Building Energy Consultants, 1320 West Tefft Street, Nipomo. On motion by Consultants Council Member Buffa, seconded by Vice Mayor Humphrey, the work was, accepted; the City Clerk was authorized to file a Notice MOTION of Completion; authorization was given to release retention funds 35 Work.Accepted days thereafter; the 'Labor and Material Bond was ordered exonerated 7 months thereafter; and the Performance Bond was ordered exonerated 12 months thereafter. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None Protesting State Item 6 on the Consent Calendar was presented: A resolution Cutbacks protesting State cutbacks affecting local governments. Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, commented that the City should stop complaining 'and cut out the waste like giving to charities and MOTION subsidizing undeserving people. On motion by Council Member Resolution 93-10 Hornbuckle, seconded by Vice Mayor Humphrey, Resolution 93-10, Adopted A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, PROTESTING THE STATE CUTBACKS AGAINST LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, was adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None Unfunded Federal Item 7 on the Consent. Calendar was presented: A resolution Mandates supporting legislation to abolish unfunded Federal Mandates on local and State governments. Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, commented that Federal money comes from the citizens and asked why Council thought it deserved money from . the Federal government. Council Member Buffa explained that when the Federal government makes a mandate, they should supply the funds. He emphasized that Council is asking the Federal government to pay MOTION for its mandates. On motion by Vice Mayor Humphrey, seconded Resolution 93-11 by Council Member Hornbuckle, Resolution 93-11, A Adopted RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING FEDERAL ;LEGISLATION TO ABOLISH UNFUNDED FEDERAL MANDATES ON LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS AND ;ENSURING THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PAYS COSTS INCURRED BY THOSE GOVERNMENTS IN COMPLYING WITH FEDERAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS, was adopted by the following roll call. vote: AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None Funding for Growth Item 8 on the Consent Calendar was presented: A resolution Management Area supporting submittal of grant applications to the Orange County No. 8 Improvement 'Transportation Authority for Growth Management Area No. 8 Projects improvements projects. Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, asked for an explanation of the resolution. The Public Services Director explained that the money being requested is from Measure "M" funds, and the City of Costa Mesa, located in Growth Management Area No. 8, has been working with other cities in Area No. 8, and Orange County, to develop projects which have regional benefits. He reported that funds are being requested for four projects: Bristol Street widening from the 55 Freeway to Red Hill Avenue; westbound right -turn lane for westbound Sunflower Avenue traffic turning north onto Bristol Street; dual left -turn lanes for northbound Harbor Boulevard traffic turning left to go west on MacArthur Boulevard; and dual left -turn lanes for eastbound 17th MOTION Street to northbound Irvine Avenue. On motion by Council Member Resolution 93-12 Hornbuckle, seconded by Council Member Erickson, Resolution 93 - Adopted . 12, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE SUBMITTAL OF GROWTH MANAGE-MENT AREA NO. 8 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TO THE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR FUNDING UNDER 'THE COMBINED TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAM, was adopted by the following roll call- vote: AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None Change Order No. 1 Item 9 on the Consent Calendar was presented: Change Order to the Contract with No. 1 for $10,000.00 to the contract with SGPA Architecture and SGPA Architecture Planning, 2603 Main Street, Suite 810, Irvine, for the Handicap and Planning Access Compliance Audit of the City Facilities Project. Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, asked for an explanation of the Handicap Compliance change order. The 'Public Services Director responded that the at Civic Center original contract was to completely review the City facilities and identify exactly what was needed to meet handicap access requirements. He explained that the change order covers additional work to review the plans to ensure that before construction occurs, the design is in compliance. In addition, the Director stated a certain expertise is needed in this field which staff does not have, MOTION and the consultant is -'providing errors and omissions insurance to Change Order guarantee the work.! The City Manager mentioned some of the Approved ! changes which already have been made in the Council Chambers by staff; however, other changes require detailed engineering design which will be done by the consultant. On motion by Council Member Erickson, seconded by Vice Mayor Humphrey, the change order was approved by the following roll call vote: 421 AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT,: None PUBLIC HEARING The City Clerk announced that this was the time and place set for Source Reduction and the public hearing 'to consider establishing a permit application fee Recycling Program and user fees for the Source Reduction and Recycling Program (AB 939) (Assembly Bill 939): Fee study and .resolution establishing an annual application fee of $460.00 for trash hauling. Method of adopting user fees. Direction to staff to review the user fees after six months and one year after implementation, and provide City Council with an updated fee study and resolution if the fees being collected are significantly different than actual City expenditures. Proper notification would be given to all interested parties. The Affidavit of Publication is on .file in the City Clerk's office. No communications were received. The Public. Services Director made a lengthy presentation of the Agenda Report dated February 4, 1993, which details background data on Assembly Bill 939, establishing certain requirements for diversion of solid waste from landfills Statewide; an analysis of the application fee; fees to implement the source reduction and recycling element; and four funding options developed by staff with input from the trash haulers. The Director reported that staff recommended adoption of a resolution establishing an annual application fee of $460.00; adoption of a resolution implementing user fees of 75 cents per ton based on the total amount of solid waste collected in the City prior to diversion, finding this to be the most equitable fee; and review of the user fees after six and twelve months. The Director pointed out that a communication from the Costa Mesa Sanitary District (Exhibit No. 5) is a request to defer payment of fees for the first year because its fees are collected through property taxes for single-family residences twice a 'year.: He explained that if a fee were imposed immediately, the Sanitary District would not have a mechanism with which to pay the fees to the City other than to use its reserves. He emphasized that the fee would merely be deferred until the District has the ability to pay, and staff recommended approval. The Director referred toa second letter from the Sanitary District (Exhibit 6), a request to waive the requirements of any user fees that would be imposed by Council for implementation of the license and permit ordinance because the District has a direct franchise and have implemented a number of recycling programs within the District for the single-family residences. He stated that staff recommended denial of the request so that fair and equitable user fees can be imposed, and to accurately monitor all requirements of the City's ordinance and Assembly Bill 939. The City Attorney expanded on the Director's remarks concerning the Costa Mesa Sanitary District by pointing out that the District stated that it is providing all the services that the City's user fee would be providing. He wanted to make it clear that the District's request was reviewed and staff does not believe the District is providing the services which the City will be providing through the User Fee Program. ' g , 122 Madeline Arakelian, South Coast Refuse Corporation and Integrated Recycling Systems, 2021 Business Center Drive, Irvine, was concerned about the Sanitary District's residential franchise contract not being in the same format as the other haulers. She asserted that the District's hauler stated that he would not abide by the City's program. The City Attorney commented that he has researched the issues and feels comfortable that the contractor providing services to the Sanitary District will comply. Ms. Arakelian felt that the fee based on tonnage was the only equitable option. In response to a question from Ms. Arakelian, the City Attorney reported that the permit obtained by the hauler from the City is considered an agreement as defined in the City's ordinance. Ms. Arakelian recommended that Council authorize staff to send letters to the commercial entities to let them know that this is not a hauler's fee, but a user fee being implemented by the City. Gary Hill, Western Waste Industries, 16281 Construction Circle West, Irvine, expressed concern with three -yard, front loader customers, the problem being that several of these containers make up one truck load and an accurate weight of each container cannot be measured. The City Attorney contended that basing the fee on tonnage was the most equitable method and was certain that the haulers would come up with an answer for estimating averages. Dolores Otting, 5 Star Rubbish Service, 2130 Canyon Drive, Costa Mesa, suggested that a consultant be selected through the bid process instead of merely seeking proposals; agreed with basing the fee on tonnage instead of volume; agreed with reviewing the user fee in six months; and recommended a program whereby fees would be collected through the business license procedure. Ms. Otting asked for information on penalties for not complying with the regulations. The City Attorney responded that the resolutions have a statement indicating that the City Council has the right under the Public Resources Code to either impose criminal charges or civil penalties for failure to comply with rules and regulations concerning collection of fees and imposition of source reduction and recycling rules. Sid Soffer, 900 Arbor Street, Costa Mesa, questioned the ability of hauler's to determine each customer's .usage. There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Council Member Hornbuckle, seconded by MOTION Vice Mayor Humphrey, to approve the study and to adopt Study Approved; Resolution 93-13, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Resolution 93-13 THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING Adopted AN APPLICATION FEE PERTAINING TO PERMITS FOR COLLECTION OF GARBAGE, REFUSE, AND RECYCLABLE MATERIALS. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None A motion was made by Council Member Hornbuckle, seconded by MOTION Vice Mayor Humphrey, to approve funding Option 2, fees based on Approved Option 2 by a "per ton" charge, by adopting Resolution 93-14, A RESOLUTION Adoption of OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, Resolution 93-14 CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A FEE PERTAINING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING } 123 - ELEMENT, and the fee study attached thereto. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Genis,Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Buffa, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None MOTION A motion was made by Council Member Hornbuckle, seconded by Authorized Future Vice Mayor Humphrey, and carried 5-0, directing staff to review the Review of User Fees user fees after `six months and one year after implementation, and provide City Council with an updated fee study and resolution if the fees being collected are significantly different than actual City expenditures. MOTION, A motion was made by Council Member Hornbuckle, seconded by Authorized Deferment Vice Mayor Humphrey, and carried 5-0, directing staff to continue of Sanitary District to work with the rSanitary District and allow them to defer payment Fees of the fees, not waive the fees, but defer payment of the fees for the appropriate period of time because of the method by which the District levies fees. ADJOURNMENT TO Mayor Genis adjourned the Council meeting to a special meeting of REDEVELOPMENT the Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency; and Agency Chairman AGENCY MEETING Buffa convened the Agency meeting. COUNCIL Following adjournment of the special Redevelopment Agency MEETING meeting at 8:30 p.m., Mayor Genis reconvened the City Council RECONVENED meeting. .Council Member Buffa left the chambers at the beginning of the Agency meeting after announcing that he would be abstaining Council Member from voting on the Costa Mesa Village Single -Room Occupancy Buffa Absent project. OLD BUSINESS The City Clerk presented the Management Plan for the Costa Mesa Costa Mesa Village Village Single -Room Occupancy (SRO) Hotel, 2450 Newport SRO Project Boulevard. MOTION On motion by Vice Mayor Humphrey; seconded by Council Member Resolution 93-15 Erickson, Resolution 93-15, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Adopted COUNCIL . OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE COSTA MESA VILLAGE SINGLE -ROOM OCCUPANCY HOUSING PROJECT, was adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Genis, Humphrey, Hornbuckle, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: Buffa Council Member Council Member Buffa returned to the chambers at this time to Buffa Returned participate in the remainder of the Council meeting. NEW BUSINESS The City Clerk presented a request from John DeWitt, 2000 Balearic Sister City Program Drive, Costa Mesa, to formalize the Sister City relationship with Werribee, Australia. The Agenda Report dated February 23, 1993, includes a chronological summary of the City's relationship with the City of Werribee. John DeWitt referred to the last discussion on the Sister City program which was held at the Council's July, 1992, Study Session. He reported that the City of Werribee, Australia, has established a 12 -member Sister City Committee, and it was his impression during his visit in Werribee that they would like to know if the City of 124 i Costa Mesa is still interested in going forward with the program. Mr. DeWitt felt it would be beneficial for both cities to share information and documents, and exchange photographs for 'exhibition.. He recommended establishing a financially self - ;supporting committee which could include government representatives such,as.the City Manager, the Mayor, and a member of City staff; as well: as representatives from the school district, civic ,clubs, the business community, senior citizens, athletic ;organizations, and churches/temples. He suggested that mailings be ,done by the City Manager's office, and that a monthly FAX be sent by both cities to be posted in each City Hall. Mr. DeWitt ,mentioned a recommendation from the Parks, Recreation Facilities, and Parkways Commission that the unnamed park on Fair Drive, adjacent to the Civic Center, be named "Werribee Park". 'Council Member Erickson commented that any funding from the City for new programs, including staff involvement, would be difficult at this time; ,and it was his understanding from previous discussions that this endeavor would be a private sector program, without City time and money being involved. Council Member Erickson asked if a committee could function without City staff. Mr. DeWitt felt it could not. 1 Council Member Hornbuckle also voiced her concern about the City's taking on any more new programs or monetary obligations, especially in light of possible staff cutbacks. She recommended 'having the City issue a press release requesting interested citizens to help form an independent, nonprofit Sister City organization, and in that way, only -those people in the community who are genuinely interested would be ' responding. She also suggested targeting people with specific expertise or who have a particular interest in this type of program; a Council Member could be named to provide a liaison with City government, and possibly a little staff time could be found to get the process started. The City Manager stated that staff would prepare the press release, and a Conference Room made available for the organization's meetings. Council Member Buffa agreed with the concept of forming a nonprofit organization such as that suggested by Council Member Hornbuckle. John DeWitt stated that his meaning of formalizing the program was possibly a proclamation or resolution from Council to the City of Werribee.; MOTION A motion was made by Council Member Hornbuckle, seconded by Directed Staff to Mayor Genis, directing staff to prepare a press release for the local Prepare a Press media, requesting members of the community who may be interested Release to Solicit in working with the Sister City organization to contact the City for Members the purpose of developing a Sister City relationship with Werribee, Australia. She stated that the intent of the motion was to get the process started to determine whether there are people in the community interested. in working towards this goal, and not make commitments of City time nor money at the moment. The motion carried 5-0. COUNCIL Council Member Erickson announced that a hearing will be- held COMMENTS Tuesday, March 2, , 1993, at 7:00 p.m., at the Neighborhood Community Center, ,1845 Park Avenue, Costa Mesa, to receive Cable TV Hearing public input on cable`services being provided by Copley/Colony Cablevision of Costa:Mesa. 1 1 I1 I Mayor and City Council+ Member Erickson commended the City Manager for Manager Commended compiling, on very short notice, the packet on the work furlough center. He also commended Mayor Genis on the good job she did at the meeting of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and felt that because of her presentation, the Board included a provision requiring a. Conditional Use Permit from the City. Council Members Hornbuckle and Humphrey thanked Mayor Genis and Council Member Erickson for representing the City at the Board of Supervisors meeting. Mayor Genis announced that citizens will be kept informed on the work furlough project as to. the date it will be heard by the Planning Commission. She estimated that it may be four months before the item is heard because traffic studies, etc., must be completed first. ADJOURNMENT The Mayor declared: the meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa