HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/06/1999 - City CouncilROLL CALL
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF COSTA MESA
DECEMBER 6, 1999
The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California, met in
regular session December 6, 1999,. at -6:30 p.m., in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, : 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa. The meeting
was called to order by the Mayor, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag led by Cadet Girl Scout Troop No. 762,
and invocation by Pastor Jerry Hollobaugh, South Coast
Christian Church.
Council Members Present: Mayor Gary Monahan
Mayor Pro Tem Libby Cowan
Council Member Joe Erickson
Council Member Heather Somers
Council Member Linda Dixon
Council Members Absent: None
Officials Present: City Manager Allan Roeder
City Attorney Jerry Scheer
Development Services Director
Donald Lamm
Public Services Director William
Morris
Planning and Redevelopment
Manager Mike Robinson
Park Superintendent Dave
Alkema
Transportation Services Manager
Peter Naghavi
Senior Planner Tamara Campbell
Assistant to the City Manager
Ann Shultz
Deputy City Clerk Mary Elliott
MINUTES On motion by Council' Member Erickson, seconded by Council
November 8 and Member Somers, and carried 5-0, the minutes of the special
15, 1999 meeting of November 8, 1999, and regular meeting of
November 15, 1999, were approved as distributed.
ORDINANCES AND A motion was made by Council Member Erickson, seconded by
RESOLUTIONS Council Member Somers, and carried 5-0, to read all ordinances
and resolutions by title only.
NEIGHBORHOOD Mayor Monahan commended Fern Langdale, Manager, Costa
WATCH MEETING Mesa Mirage Apartments, Hamilton Street, for hosting a
Neighborhood Watch Meeting on Novembor 1.0, 1999.
PRESENTATION Jack Hall, representing the Orange County Gravid. Jury,
Grand Jury explained the Grand Jury process and encouraged citizens to
Recruitment apply. for membership during the Ndve giber 1, 1999; through
January 31, 2000,;recruitment period.
i
PRESENTATION Mayor Monahan presented the Mayor's Award to Evv- Marin in
Mayor's Award recognition of her: commitment to outh and service in the
community, and commending her volun'L-:or work with local
schools and Parent''Teacher Associations.
1
1
1
- i t w.zrt 1
.t
ORAL COMMUNI-
Katrina Foley, 2778 Lorenzo Avenue, Costa Mesa, objected to
CATIONS/City
the manner in which City Council minutes are recorded,
Council Minutes
specifically she indicated that- community members' comments
should be more detailed. Ms. - Foley commented that
distribution of the minutes does not allow enough time to make
comments and revisions. Mayor Monahan announced that City
Council agendas and minutes may be obtained by providing,the
City Clerk with stamped, self-addressed envelopes.
MediaOne Cable
Steve Bluestone, 2680 Orange Avenue, No. J, Costa Mesa,
Service
reported that MediaOne, the City's franchise cable television
company, provides a low level of customer service. He asked if
the terms of their agreement with the City offered any recourse.
Mayor Monahan acknowledged that complaints had been
received regarding cable service, and noted that they had been
forwarded to the company. The City Manager reported that
MediaOne is rebuilding their systems in all franchise areas
which adds to normal operational problems, and suggested that
complaints be directed to MediaOne's Vice President of
Operations. He offered to arrange a meeting, including a
presentation from MediaOne, and allow members of the public
to question the cable service provider directly. Mayor Pro Tem
Cowan asked that the aforementioned meeting be placed on the
January agenda.
Experian Relocation Edward W. Cook III, McCarthy Cook & Company LLC, 5750
Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, and South Coast Metro
Center, commended the City for their assistance in the process
of relocating Experian Information Solutions, a credit rating and
business consulting firm, from the City of Orange to Costa
Mesa. Mr. Cook supported the Centerline Rail Project, which
will be considered later in the agenda, as an efficient mode of
transportation for the County.
EI Toro Airport/ ,Russ Niewiarowski, 20102 Kline Drive, Santa Ana Heights,
John Wayne referred to a recent article in the Orange County Register which
Airport addressed the Orange County Regional Airport authority
(OCRAA), New Business No. 4 on the agenda, indicating that a
Federal Aviation Agency e-mail had commented on the safest
and most efficient plan for EI Toro Airport. He encouraged
Council to take a stand on the EI Toro issue.
Robert B. Hanley, 1601 In Street, Santa Ana Heights,
reported that the City of Newport Beach has supported the
above-mentioned plan for EI Toro Airport for many years; and
Ralph Morgan, 206 East 15" Street, Costa Mesa, opposed
expansion of John Wayne Airport.
CONSENT On motion by Council Member, Erickson, seconded by Council
CALENDAR Member'- Dixon, and carried 5-0, all Consent Calendar items
MOTION/Approved were approved as recommended.
READING FOLDER The following Reading Folder items were received and
processed:
Claims Claims received by the Deputy City Clerk: Lisa Bushby;
Jasmine Ghazarian; Jeff Grover; and Timothy Loe.
Alcoholic Beverage Alcoholic Beverage Control requests:
Licenses
Pan Asia Mongolia Barbecue, 369 East 17th Street, Suite 12,
for a person-to-person transfer of a Type 41 ABC license
(on -sale beer and wine for a bona fide eating place).
Sopranos, 2400 Newport Boulevard, Suite 4, for an original
Type 41 ABC license (on -sale beer and wine for a bona fide
eating place).
BUSINESS PERMIT Notice of Intention; to Appeal or Solicit for Charitable Purpose
Approved Permit was received from Keiro . Services/Japanese Chamber of
for Keiro Services Commerce, 325 South Boyle Avenue, Los Angeles, to solicit
funds at Yaohan Supermarket, 665 Paularino Avenue, Costa
Mesa, from December 1 through 31, 1999, to provide care for
senior citizens. The permit was approved pursuant to Municipal
Code Section 9-127(d).
WARRANTS The following warrants were approved:
Approved Warrant Warrant Resolution 1772, funding City operating expenses
1772/Payroll 923 for $770,771.13; and Payroll 923 for $1,503,580.22.
Approved Warrant Warrant Resolution 1773, funding City operating expenses
1773 for $556,186.32.
Approved Warrant Warrant Resolution 1774, funding City operating expenses
1774/Payroll 924 for $645,533.29; and Payroll 924 for $1,498,498.61.
ADMINISTRATIVE Bids received for Bid Item No. 1038, Computer Desktop
ACTIONS/Awarded Upgrades, are on file in the City Clerk's office. The contract
Bid Item 1038, was awarded to Wareforce, Inc., 15 Hammond, Suite 313,
Computer Upgrades Irvine, for $98,287.63 (which includes a $616.54 State
to Wareforce Administrative Fee).
Approved Amend- Amendment No. 1 was approved to Master Funding Agreement
ment No. 1 to No. C-95-968 with .the Orange County Transportation Authority,
Agreement C-95- 550 South Main Street, Orange, to add indemnification and
968 with County of right-of-way language; and the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk
Orange were authorized to sign on behalf of the City.
Accepted Work for Street improvements at 738 Tustin Avenue, Newport Beach,
Street Improve- were completed to the satisfaction of the Public Services
ments at 738 Department by Corinthian International, Inc., 2932 Avenida
Tustin Avenue by Valera, Carlsbad, in connection with Encroachment Permit No.
Corinthian Interna- PS99-00484 (Tract 15607). The work was accepted, and the
tional bonds were ordered exonerated.
Accepted Work for Street improvements at 2529 Santa Ana Avenue were
Street Improve- completed to the satisfaction of the Public Services Department
ments at 2529 by Mesa Bungalows, LLC, 3535 East Coast Highway, Suite
Santa Ana Avenue 155, Corona del Mar, in connection with Encroachment Permit
by Mesa Nos. PS99-00039 and PS99-00418. The work was accepted,
Bungalows and the bonds were ordered exonerated.
Accepted Work for Street improvements at 3130 Bray Lane were completed to the
Street Improve- satisfaction of the Public Services Department by Michael
ments at 3130 Molina, same address, in connection with Encroachment Permit
Bray Lane by No. PS99-00609. The work was accepted, and refund of the
Michael Molina $8,300.00 cash deposit was approved.
1
1
1
1
Accepted Work for Street improvements at 2633-2643 Orange Avenue were
Street Improve- completed to the satisfaction of the Public Services Department
ments at 2633- by New Millennium Homes,_ 2823 McGaw Avenue, Irvine, in
2643 Orange Ave- connection with Encroachment Permit No. PS99-00478 (Tract
nue by New 15714). The work was accepted, and refund of the
Millennium Homes $15,900.00 cash deposit was approved.
Accepted Work for Design and Installation of an Emergency Generator System for
Communications the Communications Facility at 79 Fair Drive, Project No. 99-05,
Generator System, was completed to the satisfaction of the Public Services
Project 99-05, by Director on October 2, 1999, by Balvin A. Laubach, d.b.a.
Balvin A. Laubach Laubach Electric Company, 14701 Brookline Way, Tustin. The
work was accepted; the Deputy City Clerk was authorized to
file a Notice of Completion; authorization was given to release
retention monies 35 days thereafter; the Labor and Material
Bond was ordered exonerated 7 months thereafter; and the
Performance 'Bond' was ordered exonerated 12 months
thereafter.
Mayor Monahan asked that New Business Item No. 2 be
considered next.
NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented Circle of Service nominations:
Circle of Service
Nominations Induct Leroy (Roy) Andreen, Betty Jean Beecher, Charles
Beecher, and Sandy Pinkerton into the Circle of Service
located in Lions Park adjacent to the Neighborhood
Community Center.
Solicit donations from the community to cover the cost of
procurement and installation of the plaques.
The Public Services Director reviewed the Agenda Report dated
November 19, 1999.
MOTION/Approved On motion by Council Member Erickson, seconded by Council
Nominations and Member Somers, and carried 570, the nominations were
Solicitation of approved, and solicitation of donations from the community
Donations was approved.
PUBLIC HEARING The Deputy City Clerk announced that this was the time and
Vacation of Public place set for the public hearing to consider a resolution ordering
Alley No. 102 the vacation of Public Alley No. 102, located east of Orange
Avenue, south of Cabrillo Street. The Affidavits of Publication
and .Posting of the Property are on file in the City Clerk's office.
No communications were received. The Public Services
Director summarized the Agenda Report dated November 29,
1999, and asked that the public utility and drainage easements
be retained.. He provided photographs of the area. There being
no speakers, the Mayor closed -the public hearing.
MOTION/Adopted On motion by Council Member Erickson, seconded by Mayor
Resolution 99-80 Pro Tem Cowan, and carried 5-0, Resolution 99-80 was
adopted: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VACATION
OF PUBLIC ALLEY NO. 102, located east of Orange Avenue,
south of Cabrillo Street.
PUBLIC HEARING The Deputy City Clerk announced that this was the time and
East Side Annexa- place set for the public hearing to consider the East. Side Costa
tion Work Program Mesa annexation work program. The Affidavit of Publication is
on file in the. City Clerk's office. Communications were received
from Jay R. Taylor, 1631 Pegasus Street, Santa Ana Heights,
Co-director of the West Santa Ana Heights for Newport Beach
Group, stating that Santa Heights should be annexed to a city,
and requesting the City of Costa Mesa to consider a release of
its sphere of influence to permit the West Santa Ana Heights
Group to be annexed to the City of Newport Beach if East Santa
Ana Heights is annexed to that City; Edwin C. Hall, 1572Indus
Street, Santa Ana ;Heights, Chairman of the West Santa Ana
Heights for Newport Beach Group, concerning a change in the
sphere of influence. from the City of Costa Mesa to the City of
Newport Beach, for annexation purposes; a copy of a w letter
from West Santa Ana Heights Group dated November 2, 1999,
to Dana Smith, Executive Director of the Local Agency
Formation Commission (LAFCO), 23 Civic Center Plaza, Suite
235, Santa Ana, requesting a change in the sphere of influence;
a petition containing 219 signatures, requesting annexation to
the City of Newport Beach; and petitions containing 150
signatures from Subarea 3B residents requesting a change in
the sphere of influence from the City of Costa Mesa to the City
of Newport Beach for annexation purposes.
Council Member Somers announced that she would abstain
from voting on this item due to the proximity of her home to the
area in question, and left the Council Chambers at 7:15 ` p.m.
Mayor Monahan reported that although he resides in the
vicinity, he would participate in this decision as his home would
not be sufficiently affected. The Development Services Director
reviewed the Agenda Report dated November 18, 1999. He
and the Senior Planner responded to questions from Council.
The City Manager provided an overview of the purpose of
community meetings which are planned in connection with the
annexation process. He suggested that the City retain an
outside consultant; or facilitator who has expertise in these
matters.
The following persons spoke in opposition to the City of Costa
Mesa annexing their properties, preferring to be annexed by:the
City of Newport Beach: Russ Niewiarowski, 20102 Kline Drive,
Santa Ana Heights; James Daily, 341 Vista Baya, County of
Orange; Jay Taylor, 1631 Pegasus Street, County of Orange;
David Funnell, 24'60 Irvine Avenue, No. E-3, Costa Mesa;
Sharon Williamson,' 1501 Pegasus Street, Santa Ana Heights;
Robert Ashin, 300 Seawind Drive, Newport Beach; Bob
Birmingham, 346 Vista Baya, County of Orange; Robert B.
Hanley, 1601 .Indus Street, Santa Ana Heights; Ken DeFeo, 315
Colleen Place, Costa Mesa; Jessica Ching, 387 Seawind Drive,
Newport Beach; Charlotte Alexander, 347 Vista Baya, County
of Orange; Christine Daily, 341 Vista Baya, County of Orange;
and Joanne Perler, 336 East 22"d Street, County of Orange.
Bob Wilson . 3435 Plumeria . Place, Costa Mesa, gave a brief
history of his association with the. City. There being no other
speakers, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Cowan. indicated that the City had not intended
to circumvent community meetings and negotiations, and
believed that the decision on Bay Knolls had been hasty, albeit
not necessarily. a .wron,g decision. She observed that she would
like to pursue several of the- topics discussed with community
members to. affect a resolution. Mayor Monahan noted that
each area involved has different concerns.
MOTION/Directed A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Cowan, seconded by
Staff to Initiate Council Member Dixon, to address Subareas 3A and 3B and the
Meetings West Santa Ana_ Heights area, directing staff to initiate
facilitated. community meetings and negotiations, to include
contracted consultants, maximum public participation, area
residents, LAFCO, and staff, in order to discover and resolve
.issues . and concerns for those areas; to begin discussions with
the County of Orange regarding a tax share agreement and
determine if the County is interested in the annexations,
particularly the Santa Ana Heights area.
AMENDED
Mayor Monahan opined that the meetings should
be separate
MOTION/Gave
for each area, West Santa
Ana Heights, Subarea
313, Subarea
Additional
3A around Bay Knolls, and
the four islands which
are a part of
Directions to Staff
Subarea A. Mayor Pro
Tem Cowan agreed
to add this
On Meetings
suggestion to her motion,
and added that all areas should be
treated as if Assembly Bill
1555 does not exist. The seconder
concurred with the additions. The motion carried
4-0, Council
Member Somers abstaining.
MOTION/Gave A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Cowan, seconded by
Directions to Staff Council Member Dixon, and carried 4-0, Council Member
Somers abstaining, to oppose by resolution, changing the
sphere of influence for the Santa Ana County Club, to oppose
allowing annexation of the Santa Ana Country Club by Newport
Beach, to. not pursue annexing the Santa Ana Country Club to
Costa Mesa, and to pursue annexation of the two commercial
=areas on Bristol Street to Costa Mesa;
The City Manager suggested proceeding after the first of next
year.
RECESS The Mayor declared a recess at 9:15 p.m., and reconvened the
meeting at 9:25 p.m. Council Member Somers returned to the
Council Chambers at that time.
PUBLIC HEARING The Deputy City Clerk announced that this was the time and
Prohibition of Uses place set for the public hearing to consider an urgency
in West Side ordinance prohibiting certain uses/actions for properties within
Specific Plan Area the West Side Specific Plan area. The Affidavit of Publication is
on file in,the City Clerk's office.- Communications were received
from David ' and Joyce Chambers, and Marna and Wayne
Chambers, representing Coast Sheet Metal, Inc., 990 West 17th
Street, Costa Mesa, opposing any plans to rezone the industrial
area on the west side, specifically Whittier Avenue and 17th
Street. The Planning and Redevelopment Manager summarized
the Agenda Report dated November 15, 1999.
The following persons opposed the moratorium: Paul Frech,
owner of an automobile service business located at 2090
Placentia Avenue, Costa Mesa; Peter Fay, 2044 Monrovia
Avenue, Costa Mesa, representing West Side Business Owners
t
Association, who read a letter from the group; Steve Marx,
owner of an automotive business at 1950 Placentia Avenue,
Costa Mesa; Ed Fawcett, Costa -Mesa Chamber of Commerce,
1700 Adams Avenue, Costa Mesa; Nick Clemence, owner of
the business at 1474 Placentia Avenue, Costa Mesa; Jeff Silva,
owner of the business at 2135 Canyon Drive, Costa Mesa;:.and
Don Hawley, 862 ! West 181h Street, Costa Mesa. There being
no other speakers, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
Mayor Monahan opposed the moratorium because it would deny
Council the option to approve projects in the target area; no
new liquor stores or bars have been recently approved;
restaurants are needed in this area whether or not they serve
beer and wine or alcohol; gas station convenience stores would
be banned, and automotive repair or industrial type uses in the
area would be affected. He noted that Placentia Avenue houses
the automotive shops that repair cars sold on Harbor Boulevard.
He urged Council to postpone a decision until recommendations
are received from, the consultant on the West Side Specific
1
1
1
Plan.
Council Member Somers commented that the moratorium
addresses new, not established, businesses; that it would be in
effect for only a month and one-half; and would not affect
existing zoning.
MOTION/Adopted
A motion was made 'by Council Member Erickson, seconded by
Urgency Ordinance
Council Member Somers, and carried 4-1, Mayor Monahan
99-18
voting ;no, to ;adopt Ordinance 99-18, AN URGENCY
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA
MESA, CALIFORNIA, ' PROHIBITING CERTAIN USES/ACTIONS
FOR - PROPERTIES, WITHIN THE WEST SIDE SPECIFIC PLAN
AREA, approving the 45 -day moratorium, modifying Section 2
(a) as follows: "All new sales of alcoholic beverages, bars,
liquor stores, and convenience stores that sell alcoholic
beverages, with the exception of bona fide eating establish-
ments, within the; entire West Side Specific Plan study area
boundary as shown on Exhibit A."; delete Section 2(b), and
incorporate the Senior Planner's memorandum dated December
6, 1999, adding the following to the urgency ordinance:
"The provisions of the moratorium do not apply to projects
with vesting maps; projects with approved tentative maps
for which mass grading permits have been issued; residential
projects with, approved development agreements,
amendments to projects with vesting maps, provided no
increase in density or intensity of use; rehabilitation of
existing property where there. is nor requested chan...-le inland
use designation;or existing footprint."
Mayor Pro Tem Cowan reported that the plan for the west side
has not been decided as yet, and did not believe that the :'raft
will be ready in 45 days. She supported the motion. Council
Member Dixon supported the motion, indicating that the
moratorium may address the needs of the entire community.
OLD BUSINESS
The Deputy City Clerk presented from the meeting of November
Skateboard Park
15, 1999; Skateboard Park Site Selection.
Site Selection
1
1
1
01 t
Direct staff to initiate community hearings and the
environmental documentation process for the installation of a
10;000 -square -foot skateboard facility at TeWinkle Park.
Long term plan that identifies possible skateboard facilities in
Lions Park.
Communications were received from Vanna Gail Land, 552
Hamilton Street, No.. ,E2, Costa Mesa, containing five reasons
why the 523 Hamilton "Street site is not appropriate for a
skateboard park; and the Child Care & Youth Services
Committee, urging Council to move forward with plans to build
a skateboard park in the City. ' The Public Services Director
reviewed the . Agenda Report dated November 30, 1999. He,
the Development Services Director, and the Park Superintendent
responded to questions from Council.
Craig Stevens, 1845. Anaheim Avenue, Unit 6D, Costa Mesa,
supported construction of the skateboard facility in Lion's Park,
noting its close proximity to the West Side Substation, Park
Avenue. Library, and the Downtown Community Center. He
mentioned that the skateboard park had been promised to the
citizens for nine years.
Hank Lloyd, Costa• Mesa Tennis Club concessionaire, 880
Junipero .Drive, Costa Mesa, commented that the planned
skateboard facility in TeWinkle Park would be located close to
the Tennis Club Pro Shop, and noted that the skateboarders
would be using their rest rooms.
Jim Atkinson, 2871 Alanzo Lane, Costa Mesa, member of Mesa
del Mar Homeowners Association, supported the skateboard
facility but opposed locating it in TeWinkle Park. He indicated
that the park is heavily used; and expressed concern regarding
potential parking problems.
Brian Todd, 1845 Anaheim Avenue, Unit 3A, Costa Mesa,
representing Lions Park Association, stated that there is a
demand for two skateboard facilities, 8,000 feet in size. He
stressed that- the facilities should be located in the larger,
residential areas in central and northern Costa Mesa.
Colby Reedy, 2747 San Carlos Lane, Costa Mesa, 7"' grade
student at Costa Mesa High School, supported placing the
skateboard facility in TeWinkle Park but suggested another area
which was not proposed.
Vanna Gail Land,, 552 Hamilton Street, No. E2, Costa Mesa,
opposed placing the facility on the .Charle Street property.
Walt Hollowell, 1798 Kenwood ' Place, Costa Mesa, discussed
the impact of the development in Lions Park on drainage and
flooding in .adjacent neighborhoods. He provided photographs
illustrating his point. .
Paul Schmidt, owner of a business at 1351 Logan Avenue,
Costa Mesa, supported building the skateboard facility in Lions
Park, with TeWinkle Park as the second alternative. He
opposed. using the Charle Street property.
402
Herb Wollerman, 2468 Fairway Drive, Costa Mesa, supported
the Lions Park location, and urged Council to expedite the
project.
Also supporting location of the skateboard facility in Lions Park
were Eva Marin, 1780 Placentia Avenue, Costa Mesa; Brad
Nolte, 1986 Church Street, Costa Mesa; and Mike McMahon,
26 Harbor Island, Newport Beach.
Bill Turpit, 1772 Kenwood Place, Costa Mesa, opposed placing
the skateboard -facility in Lions Park because of the loss of
greenspace. He; asked that Council permanently eliminate
Lions Park from the; potential site list, and provided a diagram of
the park and adjacent areas.
Ed Keane, 2777. Lorenzo Avenue, Costa Mesa, commented that
a determination should be made as to where the skateboarders
using the park reside, 'and addressed the issue of the distance
of the park from homes.
Mayor Pro -Tem Cowan stated that the Charle/Hamilton Street
site meets many of'the, criteria as defined by staff, specifically it
is close to public transportation, commercial and retail
businesses, and there is a relative closeness to residential.
Council Member Somers supported locating the facility in. either
TeWinkle' Park or the' Charle/Hamilton site. Mayor Monahan
supported Lions Park as the, best site for the facility, noting
good transportation, ' the convenience of the Westside
Substation and the' Fire Department, and the overall ambience
of the neighborhood which includes Triangle Square, the
Courtyards, the Downtown Community Center, and local
restaurants. He opposed use of the Charle Street site for the
park.
Motion to Approve A motion was made by Mayor Monahan to approve the plans to
Locating Facility in locate an 8,000 square -foot skateboard facility in Lions Park.
Lions Park Died The motion died for, lack of a second.
MOTION/Approved A motion was made. by Mayor Pro Tem Cowan, seconded by
Charle/Hamilton Council Member Erickson, to approve the Charle/Hamilton
Street Site Street site; to design :the site to include rest rooms and other
amenities to make the' park flexible in terms of space use and
openness; to. include in the design a non -sewer -based,
permanent rest room facility;' to exclude the 8 -foot block wall;
to postpone the decision on a second site and return to that
issue in the context of and within a review of the Parks Master
Plan in two years; -and to continue pursuing the Newport Mesa
Unified School District options.
Council Member Erickson commented that 10,000 square=feet
would be a preferred size, and agreed that the block wall would
be inappropriate. He noted that the park will be centrally
located, is close to public transportation, and two schools ° are
located in the immediate vicinity. Council Member Dixon asked ,
that Lions Park be removed from the list of potential sites
because it is used i heavily by the Girls Club, Childs -Pace, Inc.,
the Head Start Program, and more. The maker of the motion
declined to add the; removal of Lions Park to the motion.
1
1
1
Council Member Erickson asked staff to include improvements
suggested by the young people, such as Colby Reedy, who
assisted with design of the park. He emphasized that the
design is good and can be utilized. Mayor Monahan supported
the motion although expressing concern about security and
access. The motion carried 5-0.
OLD BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented a request from the Costa Mesa
Costa Mesa BIA Tourism and Promotion Council for an increase in the Business
Improvement Area (BIA) assessment.
Resolution declaring the intent to increase the annual
Business Improvement Area assessment levied on the City's
seven largest hotels and motels, and setting the time and
place of a public hearing on the proposal.
A communication was received from Joe Bann, President of the
Costa Mesa Tourism & Promotion Council, Post Office Box
5071, Costa Mesa, explaining the need for an increase in the
BIA assessment. The Assistant to the City Manager reviewed
the Agenda Report dated November 15, 1999.
Joe Bann, President of the Council, requested approval to raise
the business improvement tax from one to two percent. He
reported that the intent is to aggressively promote Costa Mesa
and to increase occupancy and revenue through shopping
centers, dining, and entertainment. He showed a commercial
promoting Costa Mesa.
Council Member Erickson noted that the Costa Mesa Transient
Occupancy Tax (TOT) is one of the lowest in the County, and
asked that in the BIA assessment be shown separately from the
TOT. He suggested that Costa Mesa be portrayed as business
friendly.
MOTION/Adopted A motion was made by Mayor Monahan, seconded by Council
Resolution 99-81, Member Erickson, to adopt Resolution 99-81, A RESOLUTION
Setting a Hearing OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
on January 3, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO INCREASE THE
2000 ANNUAL BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA ASSESSMENT
LEVIED ON THE CITY'S SEVEN LARGEST HOTELS AND
MOTELS AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC
HEARING ON PROPOSAL, setting a public hearing on January
3, 2000, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council Chamber of City Hall.
OLD BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented the Centerline Rail Project
Centerline Rail locally preferred alternative:
Project
Adopt the Orange County ,Transportation Authority (OCTA)
staff 'recommended alignment, in conjunction with Street
Level Alternative 2, as the locally preferred alternative for
the Centerline Project within the City of Costa Mesa.
Request OCTA to include the City of Costa Mesa as part of
the initial Minimum Operating Segment for the Centerline
Project.
Prior to proceeding with preliminary engineering and
completion of the Final Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report, request that OCTA address
and resolve all issues , raised in the City's previous
correspondence: to OCTA , dated October 22, 1999, in
response to the: Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Draft
Environmental Impact Report.
A copy of a letter wasreceived, sent by Roger Blanchard, 1144
Sea Bluff Drive, Costa 'Mesa, to the Costa Mesa Breeze (Orange
County Register), 'expressing his opposition to the proposed
Centerline Rail Project; and a copy of a letter was received from
the City of Orange to the Orange County Transit Authority
(OCTA), dated December 3, 1999, advising them that the
Orange City County voted unanimously to oppose any further
consideration of the Centerline Rail Project. The Transportation
Services Manager provided background on the project, and
summarized the Agenda Report dated November 21, 1999.
Mayor Monahan recognized former Mayor Peter Buffa who was
in attendance.
Russ Niewiarowski,, 20102 Kline Drive, Santa Ana Heights,
reported on 'an article in the current issues of the Orange
County ,,Business Journal entitled "No Light at the End of the
Tunnel", and indicated! that he supported a light rail project but
not the current design,. He encouraged the construction of an
elevated 'system se'rvin'g four or five counties.
Wayne King, 1259;2 Loretta Drive, Orange, member of Drivers
for Highway Safety (DHS) Transportation Forum, provided
Council with binders containing information from traffic
engineers and planners regarding the proposed light rail system
which indicates that traffic congestion will not be alleviated and
will perhaps be increased. He listed several professional
organizations who oppose the system.
i
Also speaking in opposition to the Centerline Rail Project were
Mary DuFrane, 2412 West Almond Avenue, Orange; Bill Ward,
273 Hanover Drive; Costa Mesa; Les Berriman, 18871 Portofino
Drive, Irvine, member of DHS Transportation Forum; Joan
Ward, 273 Hanover' Drive, Costa Mesa; and Andrew Ward,
29321 Silverado Canyon Road, Silverado.
Paul Freeman, C. J. Segerstrom & Sons, 3315 Fairview Road,
Costa Mesa, supported the City -recommended alignment citing
that Orange Countyis built out and in need of a rail component
to alleviate freeway traffic.
Also speaking in support of the Centerline project were Phillip
Schwartze, 31682, EI Camino Real, San Juan Capistrano, a
planner working on the Metro Center; former Mayor Peter Buffa,
2824 Nevis Circle, Costa Mesa; Jim Anderson, representing
Commonwealth Partners, 3200 Park Center Drive, Costa Mesa;
Diane Pritchett, South Coast , Metro Alliance, 1631 Sunflower
Avenue, 'Suite C-37; South Coast Metro; and Ed Fawcett, Costa
Mesa Chamber of Commerce, 1700 Adams Avenue, Suite 101,
Costa Mesa.
Dave Elbaum, Director' of Planning and Development for OCTA,
550 South Main ;Street, Orange, asked for support for the
project, and reported that a major evaluation of technologies
will be undertaken in the Spring, 2000. He responded to
questions from Council.
Mayor Monahan emphasized his opinion that the rail project is, a
positive move for Costa Mesa, and encouraged the City's
involvement in the initial phase. Council Member Erickson
concurred with the Mayor, noting that the project would
provide Costa Mesa with a needed competitive advantage.
Council Member Somers stated that . transportation must be
considered in the context of land use, and noted that the impact
of the environmental reports is yet to be determined. She
objected to any increase, of density levels to accommodate
transportation in the City, and voiced her opposition to a motion
furthering this investigation. Council Member Somers
suggested redirecting the monies for the rail project to road
repair.
MOTION/Adopted A motion was made by Council Member Erickson, seconded by
Alternative 2 Mayor Pro Tem Cowan, and carried 4-1, Council Member
Somers voting no, to adopt Street Level Alternative 2 within the
City of Costa Mesa, not taking a position on cities outside of
Costa Mesa; to request OCTA to include the City of Costa Mesa
as part of the initial Minimum Operating Segment for the
Centerline Project; and prior to proceeding with preliminary
engineering and completion of the final EIS/EIR, request that
OCTA address and resolve all issues raised iri the City's
previous correspondence to OCTA.
RECESS The Mayor declared a recess at 11:25 p.m., and reconvened
the meeting at 11:30 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented a General Plan Amendment
GPA Screening screening request from Commonwealth Partners, 633 Fifth
Request, Two Street, 72"d Floor, Los Angeles, for the Two Town Center
Town Center Project, 14.6 acres located south of Anton Blvd. and west of
Project Avenue of the Arts. The Planning and Redevelopment Manager
reviewed the Agenda Report dated November 23, 1999.
Jim Anderson, CommonWealth Partners, 3200 Park Center
Drive, Costa Mesa, revisited several projects previously
completed, and commented that Two Town Center is an
excellent project.
MOTION/Accepted A motion was made by Council Member Dixon, seconded by
Request for Council Member Erickson, and carried 5-0, to accept the
Processing General Plan Amendment screening request for processing.
_Council Member Erickson supported the screening request but
stated that he is concerned.. with,I the AM and PM peak trips
rather than the Average Daily' Trip (ADT), and noted that the
increase in Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 1.2 is very dense. Mayor
Pro Tem Cowan concurred with Council Member Erickson,
specifically regarding the FAR, and suggested cooperation
between CommonWealth Partners and C. J. Segerstrom & Sons
regarding their two projects.
NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented the Santa Ana River Crossings
SARX Study; West '(SARX) ;Study update, Community Objective 98-134; and West
Side Specific Plan Side Specific Plan Status Report No.. 12, Community Objective
98-D1. The Public Services Director and Development Services
4®6
Director reviewed the Agenda reports dated November 29 and
30, 1999, respectively. The Public Services Director noted that
the SARX Study will not be completed until one year from now.
Mayor Pro Tem Cowan reported that at the meeting of January
3, 2000,, several reports regarding the West Side Specific Plan
will be presented.
MOTION/Gave A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Cowan, seconded by
Directions to Staff Council Member Erickson, and carried 5-0, directing staff to
hold the screening report on the West Side Specific Plan until
after the meeting of January 3, 2000, to complete the
screening draft and present the draft plan at the Council Study
Session of February 14, 1999, to hold the first public hearing
on the draft at the meeting of February 21, 2000, in a joint
session with the Planning Commission, and to convene a
facilitated task force to review the draft plan and return to the
Planning Commission and City Council within 90 days with a
recommended. implementation plan after reviewing all of the
options.
NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented the City's Position on Airport
City Position on Facilities for Orange County:
Airport
Resolution supporting the Orange County Regional Airport
Authority (OCRAA) position on aviation reuse of EI Toro and
continued operation of commercial airport operations at
John Wayne Airport (JWA), or
Resolution incorporating the provisions of Council Member
Joe Erickson's ;proposal of October .5, 1998, relating to
aviation reuse :of EI Toro and continued operation of
commercial airport operations at JWA.
Authorize the expenditure of up to $1,500.00 for Council
Member Heather Somers to participate in airport facility
discussions in Washington D.C., through OCRAA.
Funding of efforts to implement the City Council direction
relative to Orange County Airport Facilities.
The City Manager summarized the Agenda Report dated
November 29, 1999.
Peggy Ducey, Executive Director of OCRAA, 243 West Main
Street, Suite 101; Tustin, reported that the revised Joint
Powers Agreement addresses the need to have a community
friendly airport utilizing the two -airport system to provide for
the air transportation needs for Orange County. She informed
Council that the Airport Authority is taking a position now in
order to convey to the Board of Supervisors the type of airport
desired and the mitigation measures needed. Ms. Ducey
responded to questions from Council.
Council Member Erickson reviewed the second issue under
consideration which addressed his proposal regarding EI Toro
and John Wayne Airport (JWA). He encouraged a unanimous
vote against any effort' to expand JWA.
1
407 .
Russ Niewiarowski, 20102 Kline Drive, Santa Ana Heights,
talked about a plan he submitted for the aviation reuse of EI
Toro.
The following persons supported aviation reuse of EI Toro and
opposed expansion of JohwWayne Airport: Angela O'Neil, 383
Esther Street, Costa Mesa; Tom Naughton 1700 Port Margate
Place, Newport Beach, President of the Orange County Airport
Working Group; Richard Taylor, no address given, member of
the Orange County Airport Working Group; and Tom Anderson,
1620 Skylark Land, Newport Beach, member of the Orange
County Airport Working Group.
Tom Wall, Director of the Speakers Bureau for the County of
Orange Master Development Program, and Executive Director of
the Orange County ,Airport Alliance, announced that town hall
meetings regarding the airport will begin in Costa Mesa on
January 9, 2000, 7:00 p.m., in the Neighborhood Community
Center, and will reconvene once a month through July to
provide citizens an update on the planning process. He
reported that the meetings are designed to be informational, and
questions will be included in the environmental impact report
process.
Mayor Monahan stated that if there is no support for the airport
at EI Toro, John Wayne Airport will be expanded.
MOTION/Consider
A motion was made by Council Member Erickson, seconded by
Adopting Res-
Mayor Monahan to consider adoption of the resolution
olution at the
supporting the OCRAA position, to include the items as outlined
Meeting of
in Exhibit C of the Agenda Report dated November 29, 1999, to
December 20,
be forwarded to the Orange County Board of Supervisors,
1999
including the limited airport operation outlined on Pages 2 and 3
of the Agenda Report dated November 29, 1999, specifically a
two -airport system with EI Toro Marine Corps Air Station
(MCAS) and JWA combining to serve most of Orange County's
air transportation service; the MCAS to focus on service to
domestic markets with some international service to Canada,
Mexico and Central America; to ask OCRAA to consider a
smaller number than the 18 Million Annual Passengers (MAP)
for MCAS, but endorsing the "Coad Proposal" above for the 18
Million MAP if that is what the demand proves to be in the year
2010; implementing the same operation restrictions as presently
exist at JWA for MCAS, including nighttime noise restrictions;
and directing staff to prepare ' a resolution incorporating the
above and placing it on the agenda for the meeting of
December 20, 1999.
Mayor Pro Tem Cowan questioned the need to tie the airports
together; but supported the motion. The motion carried 5-0,
MOTION/Approved A motion was made by Council Member Erickson, seconded by
Funds for Mayor Monahan, and carried 5-0, --Zo authorize the expenditure
Washington D.C. of $1,500.00 for Council Member Somers to participate in the
Meeting airport facility discussions in Washington D.C.
Council Member Dixon asked Council Member Somers0[hat the
special exemption and restrictions at JWA that expire in 2005
be addressed at the meeting in Washington, D.C., and opposed
the Federal government removing any restrictions' or curfews
408
ATTEST:
Deputy City CvLrk of the City of Costa Mesa
from JWA. Council Member Somers responded that she would
like input from each Council- Member concerning the airport
discussions.
MOTION/Oppose
A motion was made ,by Mayor Monahan, seconded by Mayor
Expansion of JWA
Pro Tem Cowan, and carried 5-0, to oppose any and all efforts
by the County of Orange, specifically efforts in the County's
Environmental Impact Report, Plans F and G for expansion of
JWA, other public' agencies, or private aviation entities from
expanding or causing to expand, in any way, JWA beyond the
limitations set forth.
MOTION/Gave
A motion was made by Mayor Monahan, seconded by Council
Directions to City
Member Erickson, and carried 5-0, directing the City Manager to
Manager on
bring back Agenda! Item New Business 4(d), what he perceives
Airport Issues
as a contract employee, to work on the airport issues,
especially from the ,Costa Mesa perspective, and include
another option which is information distribution through OCRAA
at the mid -year budget review
COUNCIL.
Council Member Erickson reminisced about the Orange County
COMMENTS
bankruptcy five years', earlier, stating that the lessons earned
Orange County
were to live within one's means, do not take chances, and
Bankruptcy
concentrate on the basics of government.
Council Minutes
Mayor Pro Tem Cowan asked the City Manager's office to
review Planning Commissioner's comments regarding the
minutes and prepare a response for. Council. The City Manager
replied that a' proposal will be presented to Council shortly
which .will expedite' distribution of minutes and agenda items.
ADJOURNMENT
The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 1:00 a.m.
Mayorof thy City of Costa Mesa
ATTEST:
Deputy City CvLrk of the City of Costa Mesa