HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/05/2002 - City Council1
1
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF COSTA MESA
AUGUST 5, 2002
The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California, met in
regular session August 5, 2002, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa. The meeting
was called to order by the Mayor, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag led by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, and
invocation by the Reverend Barbara Stewart, St. John the Divine
Episcopal Church.
ROLL CALL Council Members Present: Mayor Linda Dixon
Mayor Pro Tem Gary Monahan
Council Member Libby Cowan
Council Member Karen Robinson
Council Member Chris Steel
Council Members Absent:
Officials Present:
None
City Manager Allan Roeder
Assistant City Attorney Tom
Wood
Development Services Director
Donald Lamm
Public Services Director William
Morris
Administrative Services Director
Steve Hayman
Police Lieutenant Karl Schuler
Senior Planner Kim Brandt
Deputy City Clerk Julie Folcik
MINUTES On motion by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, seconded by Council
June 10, 2002 and Member Cowan, and carried 5-0, the minutes of the special Joint
July 15, 2002 City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting of June 10, 2002;
and regular City Council meeting of July 15, 2002, were approved
as distributed.
ORDINANCES AND A motion was made by Council Member Robinson, seconded by
RESOLUTIONS Mayor Dixon, and carried 5-0, to read all ordinances and
resolutions by title only.
ANNOUNCEMENT Mayor Dixon announced the intent to continue Public Hearing No.
3, Resolution implementing the maximum rate schedule for certain
towing services, to the meeting of August 19, 2002; and the
withdrawal from the agenda of New Business No. 2, 2002 Orange
County Dyke March.
PRESENTATION Mayor Dixon congratulated Dane Bora, Video Production
Employee of the Coordinator; and Video Production Aides Cyndi Nguyen, Tom
Month MacDuff, Jr., Brad Long, Marvin Belvin, Karl Morgan, and Guy
Julian, on being named Employees of the Month for August, 2002,
recognizing their commitment to the continued improvement of
Costa Mesa Television Channel 74. She commended their
collective effort which culminated in the their receipt of the "Star
Award" for overall excellence of programming from the Southern
California and Nevada Chapter of the National Association of
Telecommunications Officers and Advisors.
365
PUBLIC COMMENTS Lori Hutson, Gay and Lesbian Center of Orange County, 12832
2002 Orange County Garden Grove Boulevard, Garden Grove, thanked the City, Council
Dyke March Member Cowan, the City Manager, staff, and the Human Relations
Committee, for meeting with their representatives on August 2,
2002, to discuss the route and costs of the march. She
announced that a rally will be held at 1:00 p.m. on August 17,
2002, at Lions Park, and the march will commence at 5:00 p.m.
Target Greatland Al Morelli, 3412 Geranium Street, Costa Mesa, thanked the City for
Complaints following up on several complaints that he voiced at a recent
Council meeting regarding the Target Greatland store on Harbor
Boulevard. He reported that staff had concurred with his
observations, and he showed photographs of the current violations.
He asked that the City be more conscientious in tracking
infractions.
JWA Settlement Dee Storme, 182 Brandywyne Terrace, Costa Mesa, addressed
Agreement the settlement agreement with John Wayne Airport (JWA),
commenting that if the Federal Aviation Agency and Air
Transportation Association do not sign off on the agreement, it is a
worthless piece of paper. She felt that these two agencies are
focusing on JWA, and observed that Costa Mesa is more
vulnerable than before.
Graham Comments Robert Graham, 3260 Dakota Avenue, Costa Mesa, showed
photographs of Harbor Boulevard at the 1-405 Freeway,
commenting that it is a major entrance to the City and trucks are
being parked there on a regular basis. He addressed safety issues
on a "user defined" path on Canary Street which is adjacent to a
15 -foot drop. He noted that the trees are dying on an Orange
County Corps of Engineers project in Costa Mesa due to lack of
water caused by a broken pipe, and asked the City's assistance to
remedy the situation.
City Council Bill Folsom, 2700 Peterson Place, Costa Mesa, commended
Commendation Council for their dedication and the residents for their activism.
2002 Orange County The following Costa Mesa residents expressed objections to the
Dyke March 2002 Orange County Dyke March: Eloise Ott, 3092 Loren Lane,
provided copies to Council of patriotic information; Kim Whites, felt
that by waiving fees, the City is subsidizing the event and it will
lead to other requests for waivers; and Wayne Morse, 1139 EI
Camino Drive, Costa Mesa, objected to spending time and money
on "this type of organization", and noted that an article in the
August 1, 2002, edition of the Costa Mesa Breeze reported that
fees had been waived.
Mayor Dixon observed that the first amendment right of the United
States Constitution guarantees an organization free speech and
the right to hold a parade along a City street. She responded to
Ms. Whites by stating that the City did not waive the fees.
Speaking in support of the Dyke March were Costa Mesa residents
Sue Smith, 1913 Lanai Drive, chairman of the Costa Mesa Human
Relations Committee, commended Council and staff for working
with those involved in the march, and was honored that Costa
Mesa was chosen as the site; Al Alvarez, 1845 Monrovia Avenue,
vice chairman of the Costa Mesa Human Relations Committee,
read a letter from the Committee; and Paul Flanagan, 3090 Bali
Circle, commented that the right to assemble, to demonstrate, and
to protest are marks of a free and democratic society which are
guaranteed under the first amendment of the Constitution.
1
1
1
1
1
2002 Orange County Robin Leffler, 3025 Samoa Place, Costa Mesa, felt that the title of
Dyke March the activity, "Dyke March", is intended to provoke, and expressed
concern that the item had been removed from the agenda without
disclosure of what has been approved and the City's reasoning.
She asked what discounts, street closures, times and durations
have been approved. She inquired if the same concessions will be
granted, as a routine policy, to other groups with similar requests.
The City Manager suggested that the actual permit for the Dyke
March, including the attachments, be placed on the City's website,
with hard copies available in the City Clerk's office.
Gang Activity John Feeney, 1154 Dorset Lane, Costa Mesa, reported on the
gang activity in his neighborhood, and indicated that it has become
so prevalent that it is no longer reported in the newspaper. He felt
that the Police Department did what they could but suggested that
the City's "soft on gangs" attitude be changed.
CHOC/School District Mike Berry, 2064 Meadow View Lane, Costa Mesa, member of the
Clinic at Rea School Westside Improvement Association (WIA), commented that at the
August 13, 2002, meeting of the Newport -Mesa Unified School
Board of Directors, a proposed clinic to be located at the Rea
School site, in conjunction with the Children's Hospital of Orange
County (CHOC), will be discussed. He observed that the WIA has
worked to curb the charities on the west side, and asked the City's
assistance.
Allan Mansoor, 2973 Harbor Boulevard, No. 406, Costa Mesa,
opposed placing a clinic at the Rea School site, commenting that
the area is residential. He raised the following concerns: why did
the School District "spring" this at the last minute without involving
the City Council; why were the public and the community in the
immediate area not notified of the proposed site; why is an
alternative location not being discussed; and why are there no
traffic or impact reports on how this will affect the community.
Mayor Dixon, Council liaison to the School Board, clarified for Mr.
Mansoor that she had not been advised of this proposal by
members of the School District. She agreed that health care for
children is important, however based on the information available
at this time, she felt that a medical clinic, which is a commercial
use, is incompatible with a residential neighborhood. She
indicated that if a medical clinic were presented, at a minimum it
would require rezoning, a conditional use permit, and possibly a
general plan amendment. Mayor Dixon emphasized that she had
suggested to the School District that community meetings be held
on the subject.
Council Member Robinson, Council liaison to the School Board,
confirmed that the CHOC facility at Rea School had not been an
agendized item at any of the School Board meetings nor has it
ever been discussed with herself or Mayor Dixon prior to it being
raised at'the School Board meeting and voted upon. She reported
that she had asked the Board, in the future, to agendize anything
of this nature so that it may be brought to the attention of City
Council for input from Council and the community. She and Mayor
Dixon had urged the Board to hold community meetings prior to
their next vote on this issue, and Council Member Robinson
encouraged citizens to attend the School Board meeting on August
13, 2002.
r
v a
CHOC/School District John Rule, 215 East 23rd Street, Costa Mesa, observed that the
Clinic at Rea School School District is not required to utilize the City's building permit
process for the CHOC clinic at Rea School. The City Manager
confirmed that Mr. Rule was correct in terms of the jurisdiction over
design and architectural improvements at their school sites, but
noted that when the District chooses to lease a portion of its
property for use other than education, it comes under the City's
land use and zoning requirements.
City Vehicle Adver- Campbell Davidson, 1982 Arnold Avenue, Costa Mesa, opposed
tising the proposed free clinic at Rea School, which would increase foot
and motor traffic, increase trash, and limit parking. He asked when
City vehicles started to carry advertising for private businesses.
The Public Services Director responded that the City has
participated in the advertising program for several years, and
monies generated are directed to arts programs. He explained the
program.
Costa Mesa Job Craig Stevens, 1845 Anaheim Avenue, Apt. 6D, Costa Mesa,
Center objected to Costa Mesa Job Center workers not being citizens, and
employers not being held responsible for them. He encouraged
illegal aliens to become citizens.
West Side Traffic Rich Reiser, 2070 National Avenue, Costa Mesa, reiterated his
request for additional police officers to be assigned to the west
side of Costa Mesa. He asked that unpainted crosswalks be
marked, and reported that on Thursday, August 1, 2002, at the
intersection of Pomona Avenue and 19th Street, he observed a 93 -
year -old woman unsuccessfully attempt to cross the street on a
green light. Mayor Dixon replied that the City has investigated, this
situation recently, and asked to Public Services Director to confirm
the findings.
Marina View Park Mrs. Buck, who resides on West 19th Street, observed that children
play on the slopes in Marina View Park which she believes is
dangerous. She suggested posting notices on the slopes, as well
as constructing barriers.
Concerts in the Park Beth Refakes, 320 Magnolia Street, Costa Mesa, complimented
the City on their Concert in the Park series which had been held at
Fairview Park at 6:15 p.m. on six consecutive Tuesday evenings.
Lighthouse Coastal She addressed the conditions of approval for the Lighthouse
Community Coastal Community Church (PA -00-56), stating that the trash bins
have not been enclosed in accordance with the conditions of
approval. Mayor Dixon replied that staff will investigate.
Concerts in the Park Dave Goss, 2021 Kornat Drive, Costa Mesa, complimented the
City on the Concert in the Parks series. He reported that he had
participated in the kite -flying event prior to the concert at Fairview
Park on Tuesday, August 30, 2002.
Dyke March Waiver Janice Davidson, 1982 Arnold Avenue, Costa Mesa, thought that a
waiver of fees for the parks should be granted for everyone, not
just participants in the 2002 Orange County Dyke March. She
West Side Redevelop- reported that she had attended a meeting with the facilitators for
ment the west side redevelopment, and the public was not given the
opportunity to speak. Mayor Dixon replied .that the City had hired
the facilitator to be instrumental in the way that the meetings are
conducted.
1
1
1
O
Jeffrey Childs, 1139 Aviemore Terrace, Costa Mesa, spoke about
freedom and the American way of life, clarifying that he did not
believe in giving special groups special rights.
Motion to Allow Sandy Ward, a Costa Mesa resident, asked to speak on an item
Comments on Agenda that is on the agenda. A motion was made by Council Member
Item Died Steel to allow Mr. Ward to speak. The motion died for lack of a
second.
CONSENT The following item was removed from the Consent Calendar: Item
CALENDAR No. 7, Agreement with Praedium, Inc., for engineering services to
design the rehabilitation of ten streets and one unimproved alley.
MOTION/Approved On motion by Council Member Cowan, seconded by Council
Except Item No. 7 Member Robinson, and carried 5-0, the remaining Consent
Calendar items were approved as recommended.
READING FOLDER The following reading folder items were received and processed:
Claims Claims received by the Deputy City Clerk: Stacia Bekemeyer;
Michael Angelo Lopez; Fernando Pena; Nigel Reynolds; Sabin
Stewart; and John Van Valkenburg.
Public Utilities Southern California Gas Company filed Application No. 02 -07 -
Commission 001 with the Public Utilities Commission seeking approval of its
Low Income Energy Efficiency (LIEE) and California Alternate
Rates for Energy (CARE) programs and budgets for Program
Year 2003.
WARRANTS The following warrants were approved:
Approved Warrant Warrant Resolution 1910, funding City operating expenses for
1910 $1,251,595.05.
Approved Warrant Warrant Resolution 1911, funding Payroll 215 for
1911 /Payroll 215 $1,921,863.51, and City operating expenses for $1,533,551.03.
Approved Warrant Warrant Resolution 1912, funding City operating expenses for
1912 $1,514,868.73.
ADMINISTRATIVE The two-year extension of an agreement with Atlas Environmental
ACTIONS/Approved Engineering, Inc., 5122 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 107, Huntington
Extension of Agree- Beach, was approved for additional site monitoring and reporting
ment with Atlas services regarding site cleanup of an underground fuel leak at the
City's Corporation Yard on February 2, 1998, as required by the
Orange County Health Care Agency, in an amount not to exceed
$35,000.00 each year as needed.
Approved Second The second amendment to an agreement with A.C.T., 937 South
Amendment to Via Lata, Suite 500, Colton, was approved for $131,438.00, to
Agreement with provide support services and enhancements to the City's
A.C.T. for G.I.S. Geographic Information System (G.I.S.); and the City Manager and
Support Services Deputy City Clerk were authorized to sign on behalf of the City.
Adopted Resolution Resolution 02-55 was adopted: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
02-55,. Approving COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
Agreement with APPROVING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND HOME
Civic Center Barrio INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
Housing Corporation CITY OF COSTA MESA AND CIVIC CENTER BARRIO HOUSING
CORPORATION, INC., AND MAKING CERTAIN OTHER
FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT.
®1' 11
Accepted Work by Storm drain improvements at 475 Anton Boulevard were
Experian for Storm completed to the satisfaction of the Public Services Director by
Drain Improvements Experian Information Solutions, 2030 Main Street, Suite 350,
at 275 Anton, Irvine, in connection with Encroachment Permit No. PS00-00463
EP PS00-00463 (PA -00-02). The work was accepted, and the bonds were ordered
(PA -00-02) exonerated.
Accepted Work by Replacement of Wood Support Posts at the Balearic Center,
Jet Construction Project No. 02-07, was completed to the satisfaction of the Public
for Replacement of Services Director on July 2, 2002, by Jet Construction, Inc., 3124
Wood Support Posts San Luis Rey Road, Oceanside. The work was accepted; the
at Balearic Center, Deputy City Clerk was authorized to file a Notice of Completion;
Project No. 02-07 authorization was given to release retention monies 35 days
thereafter; the Labor and Material Bond was ordered exonerated 7
months thereafter; and the Performance Bond was ordered
exonerated 12 months thereafter.
Accepted Work by Canyon Park Flood Protection and Parkway Concrete Repair and
S. Parker Engineering New Sidewalk, Project No. 01-07, was completed to the
for Canyon Park satisfaction of the Public Services Director on July 26, 2002, by S.
Flood Protection and Parker Engineering, Inc., 10059 Whippoorwill Avenue, Fountain
New Sidewalk, Valley. The work was accepted; the Deputy City Clerk was
Project No. 01-07 authorized to file a Notice of Completion; authorization was given
to release retention monies 35 days thereafter; the Labor and
Material Bond was ordered exonerated 7 months thereafter; and
the Performance Bond was ordered exonerated 12 months
thereafter.
Accepted Work by Wilson Street Traffic Signal Installation at KMart/Home Depot,
Baxter -Griffin for Project No. 02-06, was completed to the satisfaction of the Public
Wilson Street Traffic Services Director on July 3, 2002, by Baxter -Griffin Co., 8210
Signal, Project No. Monroe Avenue, Stanton. The work was accepted; the Deputy
02-06 City Clerk was authorized to file a Notice of Completion;
authorization was given to release retention monies 35 days
thereafter; the Labor and Material Bond was ordered exonerated 7
months thereafter; and the Performance Bond was ordered
exonerated 12 months thereafter.
Agreement with Item No. 7 on the Consent Calendar was presented: Agreement
Praedium for Design with Praedium, Inc., for engineering services to design the
of Ten Streets and rehabilitation of ten streets and one unimproved alley. The Public
One Alley Services Director provided a report on the upcoming street repairs.
MOTION/Approved On motion by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, seconded by Council
Agreement Member Cowan, and carried 5-0, the agreement was approved
with Praedium, Inc., 2030 Main Street, Suite 1300, Irvine, in an
amount not to exceed $260,560.00, and the Mayor and Deputy
City Clerk were authorized to sign on behalf of the City.
RECESS The Mayor declared a recess at 7:50 p.m., and reconvened the
meeting at 8:05 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING The Deputy City Clerk announced the public hearing, continued
Appeal of ZA-01-63, from the meeting of July 1, 2002, to consider applications from
Clark Council Member Steel, and from Jerry Murray, 1133 Gleneagles
Terrace, Costa Mesa, appealing the Planning Commission's
decision to uphold the Zoning Administrator's approval of Planning
Application ZA-01-63 for John Clark, for a second story addition to
an existing single-family house, in conjunction with an expansion
and remodel of the first floor, located at 1167 Aviemore Terrace in
an R1 zone. Environmental Determination: Exempt.
371
Communications in opposition to the project were received from
Costa Mesa residents Stephen J. Pew, 1.157 Gleneagles Terrace;
Christine S. O'Connor, 1128 Gleneagles Terrace, Architectural
Control Committee member; Sonia Leib and Paul Abels, 1160
Gleneagles Terrace; and Paula Litten, 1161 Gleneagles Terrace.
Communications were received in support of the project from
Patricia Clark, 3400 Avenue of the Arts, Suite 204, Costa Mesa;
John T. and Deborah L. Clark; 1167 Aviemore Terrace, Costa
Mesa; Robert Reeder, 1131 and 1127 Aviemore Terrace, Costa
Mesa; and W. E. Coburn, 1180 Gleneagles Terrace, Costa Mesa,
member of the Marina Highlands Association Architectural Design
Committee. The Development Services Director reviewed the
Agenda Report dated July 25, 2002, and responded to questions
from Council. He indicated that the owners of the property had
recently contacted staff requesting that the proposed height be
increased by two additional feet.
Council Member Steel reviewed his reasons for appealing the
application, observing that the issues involve neighborhood
harmony and privacy, as much as the view. He mentioned that
communications he recently received from Olive Maxwell and from
Steven Pew were well worth reading.
James H. Casello, Attorney at Law, 1551 South Tustin Avenue,
Suite 850, Santa Ana, representing the applicant, reported that the
objecting property owners are assuming that they have a right to
their view of the ocean and believe that they have control over the
property in between. He stated that the California courts have
consistently rejected this reasoning. He observed that this would
only be possible if there is an agreement between the parties
involved, if it were included in the homeowner association
regulations, or by City ordinance. He urged Council to uphold the
Planning Commission's decision that the project is compatible with
the neighborhood.
Joseph Davis, Attorney at Law, 1845 Mesa Verde Drive East, Suite
5, Costa Mesa, representing Paula _ Litten, 1161 Gleneagles
Terrace, Costa Mesa, thanked Council for continuing this item, and
asked that it be denied. He said that the decision should be based
on the concept of compatible neighborhoods, commenting that
there is only one two-story home in the entire terraced area. Mr.
Davis did not believe the City needed a view ordinance, and
reported that the homeowners had received a letter from an
attorney, prior to purchase, advising them that a second story is
not,compatible with the neighborhood.
The following persons spoke in support of Planning Application ZA-
01-63: Judith Clark, 20952 Beachwood Lane, Huntington Beach,
read a letter from Dan Hakala, 1159 Aviemore Terrace, a member
of the Architectural Control Committee for the Marina Highlands
Association, which stated that the project will be in harmony with
the neighborhood as planned; Patrick Clark, 3400 Avenue of the
Arts, Suite C204, Costa Mesa, observed that the addition
conformed to the laws of the City and was approved by the Zoning
Administrator and Planning Commission, the homeowners
association has not been active for over 13 years, and denying the
request will affect the property's value; Jim Beres, 21082
Greenboro Lane, Huntington Beach, showed photographs which
illustrated that there is a tree which blocks neighborhood views
more than the proposed addition; Jennifer Awad, 2674 Orange
Avenue, No. C2, Costa Mesa; Linda Herold, 2674 Orange Avenue,
No. C2, Costa Mesa; Keith Awad, 2674 Orange Avenue, No. C2,
"i
Costa Mesa; Jeffrey Childs, 1139 Aviemore Terrace, Costa Mesa,
felt that residents have the right to add to their homes, and felt that
a "view" is a privilege; and Robert Reeder, 1131 Aviemore Terrace,
Costa Mesa, felt that although some of the views would be
restricted, they would not be completely eliminated.
Marcia Livingston, 16871 Sims Street, Huntington Beach, read a
letter from Mike Morris, a broker with Star Real Estate, reminding
Mr. Clark of the "due diligence" he, Mr. Morris, performed during
the purchase of the home to determine whether or not there was
an active association governing the subdivision and found none
with authority over changes made to the home.
Sonia Leib Abels, 1160 Gleneagles Terrace, Costa Mesa, stated
that the project was incompatible with the topography of the Marina
Highlands housing development, and felt -that it violates the Costa
Mesa ordinance disallowing the construction of "monster homes"
which are out of scale and character with the surrounding
neighborhood.
Motion to Extend A motion was made, by Council Member Steel to extend the
Time Died speaking time of Mrs. Abels. The motion died for lack of a second.
The following persons opposed the Aviemore Terrace second -story
addition: Terry Douglass, 1149 Sea Bluff Drive, Costa Mesa,
disputed information received by the Planning Commission which
revealed that there were six homes in the area with two-story
additions, and felt that approval of the application will affect
property values; Geraldine Colson, 1143 Gleneagles Terrace,
Costa Mesa, observed that approval of this application would set a
"terrible precedent"; Paula Litten, 1161 Gleneagles Terrace, Costa
Mesa, showed photographs illustrating the views from several
homes on Gleneagles Terrace; Pauline Weaver, 2066 Valley
Road, Costa Mesa; Evelyn Winter, 1140 Gleneagles Terrace,
Costa Mesa, stated that she had purchased two-story home on the
north side of the street for the view, and commented on the
congenial and friendly atmosphere in the neighborhood; Olive
Maxwell, 1144 Gleneagles Terrace, Costa Mesa, observed that the
addition would diminish property values of neighboring properties,
and asked that any addition to this property be limited to one story;
Paul Abels, 1160 Gleneagles Terrace, Costa Mesa, maintained
that the intended changes will jeopardize the 40 -year long stability
in the community, and believed that the statements regarding
compatibility and harmony provide a basis for making the right
decision; Marilyn Douglass, 2249 Sea Bluff Drive, Costa Mesa,
quoted the last sentence of Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section
13-29 relating to approval of additions, "and would not be
materially detrimental to other properties within the area.", and
Section 13-29.5(a) which dealt with the protection of the integrity of
neighboring developments; Scott Douglass, 1149 Sea Bluff Drive,
Costa Mesa, felt that the proposed 'addition would negatively
impact most of the neighborhood, obstructing the ocean views of
many of the homes and thus affecting property values, and asked
Council to consider the good of the neighborhood; Ryan Litten,
3527 Lees Avenue, Long Beach; Stephen Pew, 1157 Gleneagles
Terrace, Costa Mesa, commented that his view and property value
will be significantly impacted by approval of the proposed
development, and asked Council to protect the character of the
neighborhood; the resident at 1147 Aviemore Terrace, Costa
Mesa; Nancy Dunton, 1136 Gleneagles Terrace, Costa Mesa,
suggested that the second story be built down into the bluff; and
Jay Litten, 1161 Gleneagles Terrace, Costa Mesa.
77,
1
fl
LJ
Christine O'Connor, 1128 Gleneagles Terrace, Costa Mesa,
indicated that Dan Hakala, in his support of the project, is not
speaking for the Architectural Control Committee but as an
individual, noting that the Comm'ittee's majority vote was against
the proposed second story. She stressed that the height of the
chimney would affect views, and commented that Mr. Clark did not
submit his plans to the Committee.
Robin Leffler, 3025 Samoa Place, Costa Mesa, did not feel that a
view ordinance was necessary to arbitrate this issue, believing that
the current zoning codes address compatibility, neighborhood
character, harmony; and scale. She felt that allowing a two-story
addition to block the planned views of nearby properties creates a
finding that the proposal is not compatible to scale and character.
Gail Hall, 1147 Gleneagles Terrace, Costa Mesa, suggested that
this be turned around into "something good for everyone."
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the public
hearing.
MOTION/Adopted A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, seconded by
Resolution 02-56 Council Member Cowan, and carried 5-0, to adopt Resolution 02-
56: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING MINOR DESIGN
REVIEW ZA-01-63, with the findings that the project is not
harmonious and compatible under Costa Mesa Municipal Code
Sections 13-29(e), 13-29(g)(14), and 13-34(c).
Mayor Pro Tem Monahan commented that it is difficult to deny
PUBLIC HEARING The Deputy City Clerk announced the public hearing, from the
Storage of Inoperative meeting of July 1, 2002, to consider an ordinance amending the
Vehicles on Private regulations contained in Title 20 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code
Property relating to the storage of inoperative vehicles on private property.
Environmental Determination: Exempt. The Senior Planner
reviewed the Agenda Report dated July 29, 2002, and responded
to questions from Council.
what the applicant believes is the right of someone to add onto
their home, and observed that he has seen more compatible
projects denied due to the fact that they are "incompatible". He did
not "buy" the view argument, believing the issue is whether the
addition is harmonious with other buildings in the neighborhood.
Council Member Robinson supported the motion, stating that one
of her reasons for running for City Council had been a second -
story addition in the Mesa Verde area where the home was out of
scale, out of character, not compatible, and violated Section 13-
29(g), yet had been approved by Council. She did not feel that the
proposed addition was neither compatible nor harmonious with the
surrounding properties, and agreed with Mayor Pro Tem Monahan
that the issue is compatibility, not view. Council Member Steel
supported the motion, commenting that he looked forward to the
study session where a "view ordinance" will be discussed. Mayor
Dixon supported the motion, noting that at a previous meeting, it
had been determined that the residents in a community would
participate in discussions and their opinions would be respected by
Council. She felt that the project is not appropriate for this area,
being out of scale and out of character with the surrounding
community.
RECESS
The Mayor declared a recess at 9:50 p.m., and reconvened the
meeting at 10:00 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING The Deputy City Clerk announced the public hearing, from the
Storage of Inoperative meeting of July 1, 2002, to consider an ordinance amending the
Vehicles on Private regulations contained in Title 20 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code
Property relating to the storage of inoperative vehicles on private property.
Environmental Determination: Exempt. The Senior Planner
reviewed the Agenda Report dated July 29, 2002, and responded
to questions from Council.
00',4
Mayor Pro Tem Monahan referred to Table 20-6(c), Page 18 of the
Agenda Report, noting the recommendation to separate
inoperative vehicles from wrecked or dismantled vehicles. The
Senior Planner stated that this was originally a Planning
Commission recommendation and both associations agreed to the
change. Council Member Cowan thought there should be
alternative, ways other than prohibiting the storage of cars, which
would protect the rights of residents to work on cars or store
"special" vehicles.
Mitch Barrie, 227 Magnolia Street, Costa Mesa, supported the
"Alternative Inoperative Vehicle Storage Locations", Attachment 3
to the Agenda Report, stating that the current law is not intrusive to
car hobbyists. He addressed the alternative proposal which, even
with the proposed relaxation of the law, would still protect the City
from neighborhood deterioration and blight, stating that even if the
wrecked vehicles were removed, the property would remain filthy,
neglected, weed filled, and subject to citation. He supported
relaxation of the current law.
Tauward Lee, 904 West 19th Street, Costa Mesa, supported the
changes to the ordinance, commenting that unreasonable
restrictions can be revisited and changed.
William Perkins, 1300 Adams Avenue, No. 11 P, Costa Mesa,
stated his concern for the conditions as shown in the photographs
but supported the alternatives since the ordinance should not
prevent residents from' pursuing their hobbies.
Robin Leffler, 3025 Samoa Place, Costa Mesa, stated that she is
not concerned about backyard conditions unless there is a health
hazard or it is visible and a blight on the neighborhood. She
thanked Council for the actions regarding the new RV ordinance,
and mentioned a 'condition in her neighborhood which is not
covered by the new codes.
John Feeney, 1154 Dorset Lane, Costa Mesa, reiterated his
complaints about the "Fillmore slum" and neighborhood gangs. He
asked Council to deal, with the "real" problems in the City and to
leave the car owners alone.
Bonnie Copeland, 904 West 19th Street, Costa Mesa, supported
the alternative options.
Beth Refakes, 320 Magnolia Street, Costa Mesa, supported
retaining the current ordinance which requires inoperative vehicles
to be stored in a closed building. She indicated that storing the
vehicles outdoors creates a health and safety hazard, and
residents of two-story homes should not be required to overlook a
junkyard.
Dave Goss, 2021 Kornat Drive, Costa Mesa, supported the
alternative proposal, noting that it is a more reasoned and
balanced option which provides the needed protections against
blight and health and safety issues.
Allan Mansoor, 2973 Harbor Boulevard, No. 406, Costa Mesa,
agreed with the alternatives and the prior comments made by Mr.
Feeney.
IL
Sandra Genis, 1586 Myrtlewood Street, Costa Mesa, suggested
that if the condition of the next-door neighbors yard is
objectionable, planting an Italian Cypress or other type of tree
could block the view. She felt that the City is "getting carried
away", commenting that the state of the yard is the owner's
business.
Wayne Morse, 1139 EI Camino Drive, Costa Mesa, cautioned care
in declaring a vehicle inoperative, and questioned why the vehicle
must be parked on a paved area. He proposed a better definition
of terms so as not to "step in areas where you don't belong."
Paul Wilbur, 312 Magnolia Street, Costa Mesa, felt that the
ordinance addresses private yards and not inoperative vehicles.
There being no other speakers, the Mayor closed the public
hearing.
MOTION/Gave A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, seconded by
First Reading to Council Member Cowan, and carried 5-0, to approve the
Ordinance 02-16 alternative in Table 20-6(c) with the addition of "permitted" on Parts
(a) and (b) for wrecked or dismantled vehicles, and to give first
reading to Ordinance 02-16, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING TITLE 20 OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING THE STORAGE OF INOPERATIVE VEHICLES.
Second reading and adoption are scheduled for the meeting of
August 19, 2002.
Mayor Pro Tem Monahan commented that he liked the alternative,
and opposed sending Code Enforcement into private backyards.
Council Member Robinson asked the maker of the motion if staff
would add a definition of wrecked or dismantled vehicles to aid
Code Enforcement officials. Mayor Pro Tem Monahan replied that
he would expect them to do that.
PUBLIC HEARING The Deputy City Clerk announced that this is the time and place
Towing Services :.. _ set for the public hearing to consider -a resolution implementing the
maximum rate schedule for certain towing services pursuant to
Section 9-284(a) of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code: an
agreement with G & W Towing, 965 West 18th Street, Costa
Mesa, for Police towing services; and an agreement with MetroPro
Road Services (formerly Harbor Towing), 1022 East Chestnut
Avenue, Santa Ana, for Police towing services. Mayor Pro Tem
Monahan announced his intent to abstain from the vote on this
item.
MOTION/Continued On motion by Council Member Cowan, seconded by Council
to August 19, 2002 Member Robinson, and carried 4-0, Mayor Pro Tem Monahan
abstaining, the public hearing was continued to the meeting of
August 19, 2002.
OLD BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented, from the meeting of July 15,
Residential Chain 2002, second reading and adoption of Ordinance 02-14, relating to
Link Fencing the amortization of residential chain link fencing visible from a
public street or alley.
MOTION/Adopted On motion by Council Member Robinson, seconded by Mayor
Ordinance 02-14 Dixon, and carried 4-1, Mayor Pro Tem Monahan voting no,
Ordinance 02-14 was given second reading and adopted: AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA
MESA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLES 13 AND 20 OF THE
COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO THE
AMORTIZATION OF RESIDENTIAL CHAIN LINK FENCING
VISIBLE FROM A PUBLIC STREET OR ALLEY.
OLD BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented from the meeting of July 15,
RV Ordinance 2002, second reading and adoption of Ordinance 02-15, regarding
the parking of commercial, oversized, and non -motorized vehicles
on City streets.
Sandra Genis, 1586 Myrtlewood Street, Costa Mesa, congratulated
Council on the RV ordinance but doubted that it would make a
difference. She provided an example by using a vehicle which has
been parked in her neighborhood.
Vickie Moore, a Mesa Verde resident, addressed the restriction
against unattached vehicles parked on a residential street,
commenting that these vehicles are utilized the same as an RV or
motorhome and a problem is created when the towing vehicle is
also used for work .and general transportation. She suggested the
following modification to Section 1(d)(1): "In residential districts,
large motor vehicles, recreational house trailer non -motorized
vehicles or, non -motorized vehicles attached to a motor vehicle...".
Gina Goldwag, 2021 Balearic Drive, Costa Mesa, thanked Council
and staff for their work on the ordinance.
Robin Leffler, 3025 Samoa Place, Costa Mesa, asked about a
trailer, with or without a car, hooked up to a pickup truck. The
Police Lieutenant replied that it would depend on the length, width,
and height of the vehicle.
Beth Refakes, 320 Magnolia Street, Costa Mesa, stated her
preference for a 24-hour time limit but felt that the new restrictions
will provide major relief. She approved of the ordinance being
Citywide, requiring the vehicle to be parked adjacent to the owner's
residence, and forcing the owner to move the RV onto private
property or outside the City limits for at least 48 hours at the end of
the permitted time. She felt that this should greatly improve the
overall appearance of the City.
Dennis Patterson, Darrell Street, Costa Mesa, thought that the
ordinance provides the best compromise between regulators and
RV owners but notified Council that the ordinance is against the
law. He quoted excerpts from the State of California constitution
and the United States constitution, and stated that the California
Vehicle Code currently allows for the 72 -hour parking limit.
Frank Leingang, 3368 California Street, Costa Mesa,
secretary/treasurer 'of the Costa Mesa Recreational Vehicle
Owners Association, thanked the Police Lieutenant for meeting
with the RV owners, and supported the ordinance.
Dave Goss, 2021 Kornat Drive, Costa Mesa, president of the
Costa Mesa Recreational Vehicle Owners Association, asked that
the previously referred'to travel trailer issue be investigated.
MOTION/Adopted On motion by Council Member Cowan, seconded by Mayor Dixon,
Ordinance 02-15 and carried 5-0, Ordinance 02-15 was given second reading and
adopted: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING AND
REPLACING SECTION 10-185 OF THE COSTA MESA
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE PARKING OF
COMMERCIAL, OVERSIZED AND NON -MOTORIZED VEHICLES
1
1
ON CITY STREETS AND REPEAL AND REPLACEMENT OF
OTHER AFFECTED SECTIONS OF THE COSTA MESA
MUNICIPAL CODE, in accordance with the memorandum from the
City Attorney's office dated August 5, 2002, directing staff to verify
if the State of California Vehicle Code calls "house trailers out
separately", and "look into being able to better define and add it."
OLD BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented from the meeting of March 18,
AT&T Broadband 2002, AT&T Broadband customer service issues. The
Administrative Services Director reviewed the Agenda Report.
Council Member Steel, referring to the statistics prepared by AT&T,
asked why the breakdown is not specific to Costa Mesa, listing the
number of complaints filed by Costa Mesa residents. The
Administrative Services Director responded that AT&T's system is
regional based, and staff has received a reduced number of
complaints as compared to previous years.
MOTION/Received A motion was made by Council Member Cowan, seconded by
and Filed Council Member Robinson, and carried 5-0, to receive and file the
report.
RECESS The Mayor declared a recess at 11:05 p.m., and reconvened the
meeting at 11:10 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented a request from Sav-On, 1835
Sav-On ABC License Newport Boulevard, Suite C (Courtyard Shopping Center), for a
public convenience or necessity finding for the pre -approval of a
Type 21 ABC license (off -sale general) to replace an existing Type
20 ABC license (off -sale beer and wine). The Development
Services Director reviewed the Agenda Report dated July 24,
2002.
Roger Watson, Post Office Box 659, Tustin, owner of WCDS, Inc.,
representing Sav-On, explained that the store will be expanding
from an "express" to a full-size Sav-On and will carry a full line of
alcoholic beverages. He defined the security features of the new
operation. Mayor Dixon asked if Mr. Watson had attempted to
purchase the existing license from Whole Foods Market who is
leaving Costa Mesa. Mr. Watson responded in the negative,
stating that the ABC has asked that they exchange their Type 20
for a Type 21.
Janice Davidson, 1982 Arnold Avenue, Costa Mesa, opposed the
change in license and challenged Council to cease granting
additional ABC licenses in the City.
Motion to Approve A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, seconded by
Failed to Carry Council Member Cowan, to make a finding of public convenience
or necessity allowing Sav-On to exchange their Type 20 ABC
license for a Type 21 ABC license.
Mayor Pro Tem Monahan explained that if this request were for an
upgrade of a liquor store on 19th Street, the scenario would be
different. He observed that Sav-On is a responsible company who
wishes to double the size of their operation in the Courtyards.
Mayor Dixon opposed the motion, stating that Sav-On should
attempt to purchase the ABC license from Whole Foods Market.
The motion failed to carry 3-2, Mayor Dixon, Council Member
Robinson, and Council Member Steel, voting no. Mayor Dixon
suggested that Mr. Watson contact Whole Foods Market.
NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented a request to reject the proposal
Janitorial Services from Bell Building Maintenance Company for janitorial services,
and select one of the following options:
Award contract to United Maintenance Systems, 2140 West
Olympic Blvd., Suite 401, Los Angeles, in an annual amount of
$205,372.08, without any City -specified minimum salary and
benefit levels, other than those required by law.
Award contract to United Maintenance Systems, for
$241,169.52, including a City -specified alternative level of
salary and benefits to meet the intent of providing a "living
wage".
The Public Services Director reviewed the Agenda Report. Mayor
Pro Tem Monahan requested that the two top bidders, United
Maintenance Systems and Janico, provide written proposals and
make a presentation to Council. He declared his interest in Janico
because their qualifications are better and they are local to Costa
Mesa. The Public Services Director cautioned that if Janico were
awarded the contract this evening, as suggest by Council Member
Cowan, sufficient funds are not budgeted for this fiscal year.
Council Member Cowan observed that by providing a "living wage",
the City is indicating that they believe in the value of their
employees.
Traci Hibbs, representing U.S. Metro Group, 3700 Wilshire
Boulevard, Suite 1070, Los Angeles, a privately owned minority
business and the present contract holder, pointed out that the bid
is $40,000.00 higher than the U.S. Metro bid. She asked that their
contract be renewed.
Katrina Foley, 2778 Lorenzo Avenue, Costa Mesa, asked why a
copy of all the bids were not attached to the Agenda Report, and
suggested that "vacation days" in the contract be changed to
"personal time off'. She asked if "sick pay" had been considered,
and asked about the health care plan. Council Member Cowan
replied that the plan is an HMO.
Paul Wilbur, 312 Magnolia Street, Costa Mesa, hoped that this
recommended company would not subcontract the work. He
appreciated Council's concern for the industry.
Allan Mansoor, 2973 Harbor Boulevard, No. 406, Costa Mesa,
thought it was commendable to investigate the "living wage" but
thought the wage should be determined between the employer and
employee, not by the City. He felt that Council's obligation is to
their constituents.
Motion to Award to A motion was made by Council Member Steel to reject the Bell
United Maintenance Building Maintenance Company proposal as non-responsive, and
Systems Died to award the 3 -year contract to United Maintenance Systems. The
motion died to lack of a second.
MOTION/Rejected A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, seconded by
Bell Building Mainte- Council Member Cowan, and carried 4-1, Council Member Steel
nance Bid; Approved voting no, to reject the proposal from Bell Building Maintenance
Alternative (b) Company for janitorial services, and to approve Alternative (b), a
City -specified alternative level of salary and benefits to meet the
intent of providing a "living wage".
1
1
I�
C5
4
MOTION/Awarded A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, seconded by
Contract to Janico Council Member Cowan, and carried 4-1, Council Member Steel
voting no, to awarded the contract to Janico Building Maintenance,
Inc., 3001 Red Hill Avenue, Building 4, Suite 120, Costa Mesa.
Mayor Dixon asked if the "personal days" in lieu of "vacation days"
could be negotiated. The Public Services Director answered in the
affirmative.
NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented a resolution for summary
Vacation of Ease- vacation of excess right-of-way easement in conjunction with the
ment, Avenue of the construction of Avenue of the Arts offramp. The Public Services
Arts Director reviewed the Agenda Report.
MOTION/Adopted On motion by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, seconded by Council
Resolution 02-57 Member Robinson, and carried 5-0, Resolution 02-57 was
adopted: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COSTA MESA,- CALIFORNIA, FOR SUMMARY VACATION
OF EXCESS RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF AVENUE OF THE ARTS
OFFRAMP.
NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented appointments to the Cultural Arts
Cultural Arts Commit- Committee. The Administrative Services Director summarized the
tee Appointments Agenda Report.
MOTION/Appointed On motion by Council Member Cowan, seconded by Council
Sakioka and Kastner Member Steel, and carried 5-0, Phyllis Sakioka and Diane Kastner
were appointed regular members of the Cultural Arts Committee
for two years terms expiring in August, 2004.
NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented a request from Council Member
Request for Commun Cowan in support of a Community Memorial for September 11th.
ity Memorial Council Member Cowan outlined the reasons for her request as
contained in the Agenda Report dated August 2, 2002.
Doug Sutton, 2739 Canary Drive, Costa Mesa, encouraged
Council to utilize this program to forward education. He read an
excerpt from a Los Angeles Times editorial regarding the influence
of civic leaders on education.
MOTION/Gave A motion was made by Council Member Cowan, seconded by
Directions to Staff Council Member Steel, and carried 5-0, to direct staff to prepare a
simple community event for September 11, 2002, involve school-
age children, consider holding the event at the Orange County
Fairgrounds, invite a few interfaith speakers, perhaps invite a high
school band to play, and utilize as many of the Costa Mesa Fire
Department and Police Department color guards as possible,
setting aside a nominal amount of funding for advertising.
Mayor Pro Tem Monahan asked Council Member Cowan if she
would consider working with staff on the event, and she agreed.
He asked staff to ensure that security is "real tight".
NEW BUSINESS The Assistant City Attorney introduced a request for direction
Home Ranch Educa- regarding the Home Ranch Development Agreement - Educational
tional Advancement Advancement Contribution, and reviewed the Agenda Report dated
Contribution August 2, 2002. Council Member Cowan suggested forming an ad
hoc committee with two Council Members, City staff,
representatives from both of the proposed foundation boards, and
representatives from C. J. Segerstrom and Sons.
David Wilson, C. J. Segerstrom and Sons, 3315 Fairview Road,
Costa Mesa, confirmed that they would be pleased to participate in
an ad hoc committee.
Chuck Cassity, 2866 Boa Vista Drive, Costa Mesa, representing
the Board of Directors of the Estancia and TeWinkle Schools
Foundation to be formed for the purpose of receiving and
managing the contribution made available through the Home
Ranch project informed Council that they are flexible regarding
issues raised and will attempt to reach a consensus. He indicated
that they will welcome working with the Council subcommittee, and
will attempt to ensure that the dollars are put to the best use for the
education of Costa Mesa students.
Chris Ludlow 1915 Sumba Circle, Costa Mesa, reported that she
works with the schools, and expressed her appreciation of the City
negotiating the Home Ranch agreement to provide this benefit.
A representative of Costa Mesa High School parents group who
have been working towards the formation of the foundation,
assured that they are willing to work with Council, and are very
appreciative of the efforts put forth. She reported that they intend
to follow the State of California rules for non-profit organizations.
Doug Sutton, 2739; Canary Drive, Costa Mesa, observed that the
endowment is not a gift, it is a payment to the greater community
of Costa Mesa; the development agreement clearly assigns to the
City the principal responsibility to ensure the best use of the funds;
and the City cannot delegate this fiduciary responsibility.
Council Member Steel cited the schools as being one of the City's
largest problems, commenting that enrollment in elementary
schools is high, dropout rates are high, test scores are low, and
there is an exodus of the electorate and their children out of the
system.
Motion to Approve A motion was made by Council Member Steel to authorize the
Foundations Died formation of two foundations, to approve the appointment of the
people who have .already been "slated" for the foundations; to
appoint Council Member Cowan to the Costa Mesa High School
foundation; and to appoint Council Member Robinson to the
Estancia High School foundation. The motion died for lack of a
second.
MOTION/To Approve A motion was made by Council Member Cowan, seconded by
Formation of Founda- Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, to appoint two City Council members to
tions work with the Home Ranch Development Agreement and the two
foundations, include a City staff member and a C. J. Segerstrom
representative to "sit down and hammer out" Council Member
questions and discussion which would be available from the July 8,
2002, study session transcript, and to address the Assistant City
Attorney's questions.
Council Member Cowan confirmed that any questions should be
submitted to the ad hoc committee.
SUBSTITUTE A substitute motion was made by Council Member Robinson,
MOTION/Approved seconded by Council Member Steel, and carried 4-1, Council
Appointing Members Member Cowan voting no, to appoint two Council Members as
to Ad Hoc Committee members of the ad hoc committee, and those two members shall
meet with staff and persons who express an interest in
commenting on the formation of the foundations and how they will
be administered; and staff shall return to Council at the meeting of
October 7, 2002, to provide the recommendations and the answers
to questions raised at the study session of July 8, 2002.
The Assistant City Attorney approved of the substitute motion
which he maintained was a good vehicle with which to address the
issues and to provide a report or recommendations to Council for
managing the $2 million. Council Member Cowan opposed the
substitute motion because of the groundwork, which has already
been completed, and the community input which has already been
received.
Motion to Appoint A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Monahan, seconded by
Cowan and Robinson Mayor Dixon, to appoint Council Member Cowan and Council
Withdrawn Member Robinson to the ad hoc committee. After discussion
Mayor Pro Tem Monahan withdrew the motion.
MOTION/Appointed A motion was made by Mayor Dixon, and carried 5-0, to appoint
Dixon and Monahan Mayor Pro Tem Monahan and Council Member Robinson to the ad
hoc committee. .
CITY MANAGER'S The City Manager presented an_ ordinance amending Sections 2-
REPORT/Deadlines 40, 2-42, and 2-44. of ..Chame€, III of Title 2 of the Costa Mesa
for e -Agenda System Municipal Code relating -to. -City _Council meetings and procedures,
to reflect current pro,cess= and ~changes to deadlines in order to
implement the e -Agenda -
system-MOTION/Gave On motion by Mayor Pro: Tem Monahan, seconded by Mayor
Ordinance 02-17 Dixon, and carried `5-01. Ordinance 02-17 was given first reading
First Reading and passed to second reading: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF , COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING SECTIONS 2-40, 2-42, AND 2-44 OF CHAPTER III
OF TITLE 2 OF THE COSTA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND PROCEDURES.
Second reading and adoption are scheduled for the meeting of
August 19, 2002.
_r
COUNCIL Council Member Steel addressed the upcoming 2002 Orange
COMMENTS County Dyke March, suggesting that items such as this perhaps
2002 Orange County should be addressed at a Council study session prior to being
Dyke March placed on an agenda. He did not understand the purpose of the
march and wondered if it is necessary. He did not believe that this
action will build tolerance, thinking rather that it will offend many
persons.
Public Services CIP Council Member Cowan advised that she had asked the City
Process Manager to provide an assessment of the Public Services Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) process. She reported that several
major projects such as the Seismic Retrofit of City Hall and the
Downtown Community Center have not been completed
satisfactorily, as well as the shelter and bathroom at Fairview Park,
and several landscaping projects. Council Member Cowan asked
that it be determined if the problem is the scope of work, the City's
expectations, or design of the project, and asked for an initial
report in six or seven months.
Mayor's Cup Mayor Dixon announced her attendance at the Mayor's Cup, which
consists of the all stars from the National and American Leagues.
She announced that the National League won in two games. She
Balearic School reported her and Council Member Robinson's attendance at the
Agreement Newport -Mesa Unified School District meeting the previous week,
and noted that they expect to see an agreement regarding the
Balearic School site within the next six to eight weeks. She said
Costa Mesa and that the Costa Mesa Community Foundation has completed the
Estancia High School Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Estancia High School, and
EIR's will shortly arrange for a public hearing, and the Costa Mesa High
School EIR is due in about eight weeks, and a hearing will also be
held on that issue. Mayor Dixon- further reported that the Banning
ranch property is not suitable for a school so the District is
considering other options. Rea School was discussed and she
encouraged members to attend the School District board meeting
on Tuesday, August 13, 2002, and Keep Costa Mesa Beautiful and
the School District will implement a litter curriculum this fall.
ADJOURNMENT The Mayor declared the meeting adj rued art 12:35 a.m.
t
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa
ATTEST:
Deput _ -ity Clerk of tK`e_City, of Costa Mesa
cr
19
1
1