Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/01/2004 - City CouncilROLL CALL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF COSTA MESA March 1, 2004 The City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, California, met in regular session March 1, 2004, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa. The meeting was called to order by the Mayor, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Council Member Steel, and invocation by the Reverend Gary Archer, Vanguard University. Council Members Present: Council Members Absent: Officials Present: Mayor Gary Monahan Mayor Pro Tem Allan Mansoor Council Member Mike Scheafer Council Member Chris Steel Council Member Libby Cowan City Manager Allan Roeder Acting City Attorney Tom Wood Public Services Director William Morris Development Services Director Don Lamm Administrative Services Director Steve Hayman Finance Director Marc Puckett Planning and Redevelopment Manager Mike Robinson Senior Planner Kimberly Brandt Associate Planner Wendy Shih Deputy City Clerk Julie Folcik ORDINANCES AND A motion was made by Council Member Steel, seconded by RESOLUTIONS Council Member Scheafer, and carried 4-0, Council Member Cowan absent, to read all ordinances and resolutions by title only. PRESENTATION Mayor Monahan announced that Brittany Rausch was selected as Mayor's Award the March 2004 recipient of the Mayor's Award for starting The Pump Girls, a singing and dancing group, to raise awareness and funding for young people living with Juvenile Diabetes, which displayed admirable initiative and compassion. PRESENTATION Mayor Monahan congratulated City Manager's Department Employee of the Month Management Analyst Carol Proctor on being named Employee of the Month for March 2004, in recognition of her diligence, commitment and follow-through in overseeing the improvements at Jordan Park, made possible through the generous donations of Chuck and Diane Buchanan. PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Monahan announced that the following Proclamations were presented by the City: Mr. Frank Barbaro, Orange County Attorney, receiving the Heritage Award by the Orange County American Italian Renaissance Foundation. Mayors' Prayer BreakfastMarch 17, 2004. PUBLIC COMMENTS Judi Berry, Costa jm'e' sa,-reminded the community to vote on Vote Tuesday, March 2, 2004. 1 1 1 Lindbergh School Site Don Knipp, Costa Mesa, reported that the Orange County Department of Education, currently leasing the Lindbergh School Site, located at 220 East 23rd Street, for many years, has utilitzed the site as an "industrial building site" in their residential neighborhood. He advised Council that the lease is through July, 2004, and requested their assistance in approaching the School board on other alternative uses for the site and thanked Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor for his prompt response to a recent letter submitted regarding this matter. Mayor Monahan suggested this issue be placed on the Newport -Mesa School Board Liaison Agenda, in late March, for discussion. He confirmed with the City Manager that the City has an agreement to maintain the field, above the underground reservoir, that is directly adjacent to a small city park. Senior Housing/Single Anne Hogan-Shereshevsky, Costa Mesa, expressed that there is a Room Occupancy need for more senior housing in the City, suggesting that more single room occupancy homes should be available. She disagreed 1901 Newport with redevelopment funds being used for the project at 1901 Boulevard Newport Boulevard. Ms. Hogan-Shereshevsky also suggested, if possible, one stop payment facilities, where seniors are able to pay their utility bills. Annexation in Sphere Martin Millard, Costa Mesa, commented on the City's efforts of Influence regarding the annexation of the Golf Course area in Costa Mesa's sphere of influence, stating that the City has not negotiated in a "hard fashion." He suggested that should Newport Beach wish to pursue annexation of the area, that perhaps Costa Mesa should seriously consider negotiating for a section of beach that extends Litter down the Santa Ana River, between Huntington Beach and Newport Beach, together with reciprocal agreements for police and fire services. Mr. Millard complained about litter and shopping Loitering Day Workers carts on Baker Street, asking for more enforcement, advised of day workers loitering at Baker and Bristol Streets, and of the commercial vehicles parking near Paularino School for extended periods of time. Municipal Code Igal Israel, Costa Mesa, referenced his comments made at a prior Section 1-33 meeting regarding enforcement of Section 1-33(c) and (d) of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code. Mayor Monahan advised that a written response was prepared by the Acting City Attorney, and provided him with a copy. Mr. Israel also inquired about the Newport Boulevard adoption of the Newport Boulevard Specific Plan, SP -96-01, and Specific Plan SP -96-01 requested a copy of the adopting ordinance, along with the Affidavit of Publication. The Development Services Director reported that the Newport Boulevard Specific Plan regulates the property where Mr. Israel's business is located, and advised that he could obtain a copy of the requested documents in the Planning Department. Job Center Janice Davidson, Costa Mesa, commented that the City should close the Costa Mesa Job Center, but otherwise suggested that non -Costa Mesa laborers utilizing the center should be paid less than those that are Costa Mesa residents. Mayor Monahan pointed out that a similar motion had been made previously, but failed to carry. Ms. Davidson expressed . her appreciation to Tony Morello Council Member Scheafer and the Lion's Club for their generosity, and Council Member Steel for his act of kindness to the family of Tony Morello. CONSENT On motion by Council Member Scheafer, seconded by Mayor Pro CALENDAR Tem Mansoor, and carried 4-0, the Consent Calendar items were approved as recommended: .^16 READING FOLDER The following Reading Folder items were received and processed: Claims Claims received by the Deputy City Clerk: Steven Scott Peet; Debra A. Randall;- Jon and Julie Rohrer; Susan K. Shade; Southern California Edison; and Christine Trigg. ABC Licenses Request for Alcoholic Beverage Control Licenses were received from: Empire Brothers, Inc., 891 Baker Street, Suite B1, for a person- to-person transfer of a Type 21 (off -sale general). Jae Hyung Chung, 401 East 17th Street, Suite C, for a person-to- person transfer of a Type 41 (on -sale beer and wine for a bona fide eating place). EI Campeon Carniceria, 517 West Wilson Street, for a person- to-person transfer of a Type 20 (off -sale beer and wine). WARRANTS The following warrants were approved: Approved Warrant Warrant Resolution 1993, funding Payroll 404 for $1,902,110.96, 1993/Payroll 403A and Payroll No. 403A for negative $13,741.08, and City operating Payroll 404 expenses for $1,015,687.13, including payroll deductions. Approved Warrant Warrant Resolution 1994 funding City operating expenses for 1994 $775,571.20. ADMINISTRATIVE Annual Review No. 2; of the City of Costa Mesa General Plan was ACTIONS/Annual received and filed. Review No. 2 of the General Plan Adopted Resolution Resolution 04-18 was adopted: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 04-18 Revising Salary COUNCIL OF THE:: CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, Ranges for C.M.F.A. REVISING THE SALARY RANGES FOR JOB CLASSIFICATIONS REPRESENTED BY THE COSTA MESA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION (C.M.F.A.) TO REFLECT THE ESTABLISHED LABOR MARKETPLACE PURSUANT TO THE 2000-2004 MOU; and Budget Adjustment No. 04-064 was approved for $49,197.00. Adopted Resolution Resolution 04-19 was adopted: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 04-19 Adopting the COUNCIL OF THE' CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, 2003-2004 Statement ADOPTING THE 2003-2004 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT of Investment Policy POLICY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO INVEST AND REINVEST IDLE MONIES OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA IN . ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2003-2004 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY. PUBLIC HEARING The Deputy City Clerk announced that this is the time and place Appeal of Zoning set for a public hearing to consider an application from Council Application ZA-03-94 Member Steel appealing the Planning Commission's approval of Zoning Application ZA-03-94 for Andrew K. Hartzell, for a minor design review and minor conditional use permit to construct an office with a full bathroom above a new detached garage, located at 440 East 19th Street in an R1 (Single Family Residential) zone. Environmental Determination: Exempt. The Affidavits of Publishing and Mailing are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Communications were received from the following Costa Mesa residents: Barbara Beck, requesting that Council consider deletion of the proposed bathroom; and Andrew Hartzell, urging Council to uphold the Planning Commission's decision without further conditions. 1 1 4Z3 Council Member Steel commented that he appealed the decision of the Planning Commission on behalf of Morris Berger, due to privacy issues, noting aspects of the project such as the location of the stairwell, the placement of the proposed windows, and the removal of the trees extending to the rear alley. The Associate Planner reviewed the Agenda Report, and responded to questions from Council. Andrew Hartzell, Costa Mesa, commented on his project noting that it was well within the Residential Design Guidelines, that he had addressed the concerns of his neighbors in his design, and with the exception of Mr. Berger, he had gained their support. He pointed out that the proposed windows are block from view of Mr. Berger's yard by Cypress trees that he maintains, and explained that the windows offer a functional purpose in providing proper lighting into the work area. He assured Council that he has worked to minimize the concerns of all his neighbors, and asked that Council approve the project with no further conditions. In response to Council. Member Steel he advised of his intent to leave the property as R1, and pointed out that the has placed a "Declaration of Land Use Restriction" on his property as requested by the Planning and Building Department, to guarantee compliance with the R1 designation. Mr. Hartzell answered questions relative to privacy screening from Council Member Steel. Morris Berger, Costa Mesa, showed a photograph that illustrated how his privacy would be infringed upon by the addition of a second story by Mr. Hartzell. He stated that regarding his objection to the addition, he is the neighbor who would be most affected. Mr. Berger reviewed the two reasons for his appeal, noting that if any of the existing tree screening were removed, his entire rear yard would be in direct line of sight from the Westside windows, landing, and staircase, suggesting a condition that Mr. Hartzell be required to provide effective screening. He also believed that a modification in the plans for the second story Westside windows, landing and staircase would reduce the direct views into his property, suggesting that the windows be raised above eye -level and that additional light could be achieved by skylights. Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, felt that there should be a condition added to require landscaped screening subject to the approval of the Planning Department; and was confused about the necessity for the addition of a bathroom in the second story. There being no further speakers, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor expressed his support of the decision of the Planning Commission commenting that he believed that the 500 square foot, second floor addition would be of minimal impact, noting that it is well below the 80 percent second story building restriction. He also suggested that trees or screening could be added by either homeowner to preserve personal privacy. Council Member Scheafer also supported the decision of the Planning Commission and stated that he did not agree in the City conditioning the requirement of the trees for privacy. He instead felt that resolving the privacy issue should be a compromise between the two parties. Mayor Monahan commented that he did not feel it appropriate for the City to dictate the type of door or windows to install nor the trees to be planted for a project, and therefore requested that Condition of Approval No. 7, regarding the installation of the our door with a frosted glass or opaque material, be deleted. MOTION/Adopted A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor, seconded by Resolution 04-20 Council Member Scheafer, and carried 3-1, Council Member Steel Approving ZA-03-94 voting no, to uphold the Planning Commission's decision by adoption of Resolution 04-20: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ; CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MINOR DESIGN REVIEW ZA' 03-94, deleting Condition of Approval No. 7. RECESS The Mayor declared a recess at 7:50 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 8:00 p.m. j PUBLIC HEARING The Deputy City Clerk announced that this is the time and place Trailer Park set for a public hearing for consideration of the Trailer Park Conversion Impact Conversion Impact Report for Snug Harbor Village and EI Nido Report Trailer Parks located ,at 1626 and 1640 Newport Boulevard. The Affidavits of Publishing and Mailing are on file in the City Clerk's Office. No communications were received. The Development Services Director and: Senior Planner reviewed the Agenda Report dated February 25, : 2004., and responded to questions from Council. Council Member Steel expressed his appreciation of staff's efforts in this matter, and expressed his hope that the remaining homeowners are given a fair relocation agreement from the property owner. Barry McDaniel, Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc., Long Beach, stated that his firm': has assisted Brown & Associates in the relocation of families' living within the mobile home parks. He reviewed the relocation activities, and believed that it has been successful to date. Florence Johnson, no address given, confirmed with the Senior Planner that "utility reconnections" included any service that the homeowner currently ,has, confirmed that moveable homes would be moved by licensed movers with current permits, and all relocation agreements would be made in writing. Warren LaHara, Apple Valley, questioned the definition of "legally constructed structures", to which the Senior Planner responded that the permitting agency for any mobile home additions are done by the State of California, and the negotiations would be between the park owner and homeowner regarding these structures. He advised that over the history of the park the permitting authorities have change; he also mentioned that to day, it has not been licensed contractors with current permits that have moved the mobile homes recently relocated. Mike Berry, Costa Mesa, opined that Council is considering a resolution in exercising an authority that the City does not rightfully have.. The City Attorney explained that State Law requires the City to approve the accuracy of the report. The Development Services Director advised that adoption of a resolution is all that is needed for Council to approve; the Trailer Park Conversion Impact Report. 1 1 1 Norah O'Malley, Costa Mesa, questioned what is considered a doublewide mobile home and also confirmed that the mobile homes recently relocated have not been by licensed contractors. Morgan Augustus, no address given, representing his father, a resident at one of the mobile home parks, advised that upon visiting with his father the "available spaces" at the other parks provided by Brown & Associates, he found them to be incomparable in that there were unaffordable at $300.00 to $400.00 in excess of what is currently paid by his father. The Senior Planner confirmed for the Mayor that the Report stipulates that the owners of the park are required to provide a list of comparable parks, within a thirty -mile radius, that have spaces available. Dave Salcido, Costa Mesa, questioned if the property owner could chose to pay off a homeowner in place of a relocation agreement, and the Senior Planner advised that he could not. James Quade, Costa Mesa, stated that he is concerned about the reference to "legally constructed additions". He explained that he purchased his home that had a room addition, and there now is some questions as to whether it was legal or not, commenting that he could potentially be losing about 300 square feet of his home. Irene Shannon, Costa Mesa, appreciated Council's assistance in this matter, stating that the homeowners were now being treated fairly, that the park is being maintained, and agreements were being made between the property owner, and the homeowners. She expressed, however, that enforcement of the Report was an issue of concern. Sandy Johnson, Costa Mesa, felt that the movement or placement of homes should be restricted to mobile homes and any "legally constructed attachments", asking that "legal" be removed from the requirement, and instead felt that "the same or comparable replacement" should be offered. She also inquired as to a guarantee to the homeowners that the homes will be properly reassembled, and if not, whom the responsible party would be. Jean Stirling -Stevens, Newport Beach, questioned when and if there had been written settlements offered to each of the homeowners, stating that it would show good faith on the part of the property owner. She thanked Council and staff for their time and efforts in this matter. Don Hunter, Costa Mesa, commented that the City of Carson had a very good and comprehensive relocation ordinance. Coralee Newman, Government Solutions, Newport Beach, representing Brown & Associates, read a letter from a satisfied homeowner who had been successfully relocated. Barry McDaniel, Overland, Pacific & Cutler, Inc., Long Beach, clarified that licensed contractors have been used to move the mobile homes; that there is a written list of open spaces in comparable trailer parks that can be provided to all the remaining homeowners; and written offers have been provided to all homeowners. Council Member Scheafer confirmed that a doublewide mobile home requires two separate and distinct serial numbers that distinguishes it from a singlewide. Jeffrey Goldfarb, Rutan & Tucker, LLP, Costa Mesa, explained "illegal additions" by stating "if an improvement was not legally constructed at the time it was built, then it is considered illegal, and the owner cannot move it to another location because the owner would be incurring liability for reconstructing an illegal improvement." The City Attorney responded that in moving anything to another City, another City's codes would have to be complied with before it would be considered legal. There being no further speakers, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Mayor Monahan expressed his apprehension regarding the deletion of the word "legally" in regards to "constructed additions," expressing the need for the structures to be in legal compliance, to avoid safety and liability concerns. MOTION/Adopted A motion was made by Mayor Monahan, seconded by Council Resolution 04-21 Member Steel, and carried 4-0, to adopt Resolution 04-21: A Approving Relocation RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA Impact Report MESA, CALIFORNIA,: APPROVING THE RELOCATION IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE SNUG HARBOR VILLAGE AND EL NIDO MOBILE HOME PARKS LOCATED AT 1626 AND 1640 NEWPORT BOULEVARD; with the addition of two conditions, "all moveable mobile homes, and legally constructed additions, will be disassembled and reassembled by a licensed moving company with the appropriate permits; and all relocation agreements between the park owner and homeowner shall be made in writing". RECESS The Mayor declared a recess at 9:15 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 9:25 p.m. , OLD BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented from the meeting of February 17, Potential New 2004, Consideration of Potential New Revenue Sources. Revenue Sources Mayor Monahan proposed the continuance of the item to the next meeting due to the importance of the discussion and the absence of Council Member Cowan, but announced that public comment would be taken. Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor concurred adding that it would be more appropriate to discuss potential cuts before addressing the issue of increasing revenue sources. Judi Berry, Costa Mesa, commented that she is in favor of the business license fee increase, but pointed out that the fees suggested would have more of an impact on the smaller business owners than on the larger businesses. She suggested that a fee be established for the companies generating over $2 million dollars, which would be higher than those generating under $500,000.00, and in addition suggested a $50.00 charge for those businesses owners that are not Costa Mesa residents. Katrina Foley, Costa Mesa, asked that Council consider the advertising revenue with respect to the transportation billboards, 1 1 such as those at bus stops, and an additional possible generator of revenue. Robert Graham, Costa Mesa, proposed that Council concentrate on providing more business opportunities to generate interest and revenue, instead of relying on increasing taxes. He suggested the possibility of a freeway sign advertising the car dealerships on Harbor Boulevard, and also suggested a bridge from Harbor Boulevard to Triangle Square, "it make it a more viable center." Mr. Graham referenced the City Council policy relative to the City's business strategy and community improvement, and commented that it was in direct conflict with that proposed in the raising of taxes. Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor addressed Mr. Graham's suggestions and advised of the outcome of the efforts made in the past to pursue those "opportunities". He also commented that he is not interested in generating new revenue until some cuts are made in the budget. Council Member Steel confirmed with the City Manager that if Council were to prepare a ballot measure for November, 2004, the deadline would be the July 6, 2004, City Council meeting. MOTION/Continued to A motion was made by Mayor Monahan, seconded by Mayor Pro March 15, 2004 Tem Mansoor, and carried 4-0, to continue the consideration of potential new revenue sources to the meeting of March 15, 2004. NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented Consideration of Prioritization of Prioritization of Programs and Services Efforts/Establishment of Long -Term Programs and Budgetary Strategies. The Finance Director reviewed the Agenda Services Report dated February 10, 2004, and he and the City Manager responded to questions from Council. Judi Berry, Costa Mesa, expressed her confusion over the rating system that was used in the Agenda Report. The Finance Director and the City Manager explained the process that staff utilized in the rating of each of the programs and services. Dave Salcido, Costa Mesa, suggested volunteerism, stating that there were many individuals willing and available to volunteer where needed. Sam Clark, Costa Mesa, thought that the shopping cart retrieval program should be paid for through the businesses that own the shopping carts. He also did not believe that the City should fund the Community Garden. He further commented the programs that are to be continued should meet the need of the larger majority. Beth Refakes, Costa Mesa, commented that she would have liked to see the costs associated with each of the programs and services mentioned in the report. The City Manager confirmed that the costs associated for the programs and services that are brought forward by Council will be provided in the next report. Katrina Foley, Costa Mesa, recommended that Council adopt a combination approach of prioritization and revenue generating. She thought that significantly cutting employees salaries and benefits could cause lower efficiency within the operations of the City. Ms. Foley also felt that some of the programs considered low priority brought the community together and were part of the quality of life for the residents of the City. WN Eric Bever, Costa Mesa, urged Council to protect the public safety budget, as it is essential to the well being of the community. Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor commented that he did not agree with the approach to either increase fees or borrow to resolve the City's financial crisis. He felt that spending what is taken in, or less than what is taken in is the best philosophy. He suggested that for a long-term strategy: reductions in programs or services, if necessary some "across the board cuts", and lastly renegotiation of employee salary and benefit provisions and consideration of potential new revenue, sources. i Mayor Monahan stated that he would be hesitant at renegotiating employee salary and benefits at this time, and was also reluctant of the "across the board cut", but was willing to pursue reprioritization of services. He commented that he would consider new revenue sources such as an increase in business license fees. Council Member Steel followed with his listing of preferences of strategies concurring that the prioritization of programs and services would be : the best place to begin, followed by consideration of new revenue sources, across the board cuts of five percent, and then if necessary, renegotiation of employee salaries and benefits. Council Member Scheafer concurred with the recommendation to first address the prioritization of programs and services. He expressed apprehension of the five percent across the board cuts, due to how it could affect public safety and regarding new revenue sources, commented that he is a supporter of the increase of the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). The City Manager, referencing the across the board cuts, clarified that the five percent was used to illustrate the magnitude that such a reduction would have on the City, and was in no way meant to be a set amount recommended for such reductions. Motion Failed to Carry On motion by Council Member Steel, seconded by Council Member Scheafer, staff was directed to focus on the long-term budgetary strategies in the following order: reductions in programs and services, potential new revenue sources, consideration of an across the board cut (percentage to be determined), and the reconsideration of employee salary and benefit provisions. Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor expressed that he would not support the motion as he felt the primary focus should be on budget cuts. He further commented that he would not wish to consider reduction of employee salary and benefits at this time. Mayor Monahan explained that the potential revenue sources would be brought back to Council at the next meeting and asked that it be withdrawn from the motion. MOTION/Provided On motion by Council Member Steel, seconded by Council Direction to Staff Member Scheafer, and carried 4-0, staff was directed to focus on the long-term budgetary strategy of reductions in programs and services with some consideration of an across the board cut (percentage,to be determined) as a secondary long-term budgetary strategy: Mayor Monahan explained that the following action was not to eliminate or change any program or service, but was meant for discussion and to request more information from staff for more detailed information regarding the select programs and services, which would be brought back at a future date for review. The Council Members each listed those programs that they were interested in reviewing. MOTION/Requested On motion by Mayor Monahan, seconded by Council Member Review of Programs Steel, and carried 4-0, staff was requested to review of the and Services following programs and services: (Police) Park Rangers, Community Education Programs, DARE Program and Community Service Program; (City Manager) Committee Support, Community Foundation, the City Newsletter, Public Notice Requirements, the Appeals process and the Assistant City Manager position; (City Attorney) Municipal Code prosecutions; (Public Services) Council and Commission Support, the Skateboard Park and the Community Gardens; (Development Services) Planning Commission Support; Citizen Committee Support and Shopping Cart Retrieval Program; (Administrative Services) Wellness Programs, Personnel Committee Support, Teen Programs, Adult Programs, Concerts and Events, Recreation Committee Support, Day Camp, Field Allocation and Field Ambassadors, Job Center, Playground and Mobile Recreation and Skate Units, Recreation Commission Support, Family Programs, Youth Programs, and the Birthday Program; and (Finance) Grant Writing; and provide a brief description of each of the programs and services listed and inclusive of those to be added by Council Member Cowan (absent), at the March 15, 2003, Council Meeting. There being no objection, New Business Item No. 3 was taken out of order. NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented consideration of a proposal by Moment of Solemn Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor to adopt a new City Policy that replaces Expression the Invocation with a Moment of Solemn Expression. Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor reviewed the Agenda Report dated February 25, 2004, and he and the Acting City Attorney responded to questions from Council, along with Chris Arledge, Turner Green Afrasiabi & Arledge, LLP, Costa Mesa. Sam Clark, Costa Mesa, expressed his appreciation of Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor bringing this subject forward, and asked that Council approve the recommendation. Eric Bever, Costa Mesa, suggested that Council allow anyone in the public to present the Moment of Solemn Expression instead of only members of the clergy. Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor confirmed that is part of the policy. MOTION/Adopted On motion by Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor, seconded by Mayor Council Policy 000-12 Monahan, and carried 4-0, Council Policy 000-12 was adopted. NEW BUSINESS The Deputy City Clerk presented the Westside Community Westside Community Improvement Work Plan and Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor's Improvement Work Revitalization Incentives. The Development Services Director, and Plan the Planning and Redevelopment Manager reviewed the Agenda Report dated February 19, 2004, and responded to questions from Council, along with Mayor Pro.Tern Mansoor. Ralph Ronquillo, Costa Mesa, Westside Revitalization Oversight Committee (W.R.O.C.) Chairman, presented an overview and update of the Committee and their activities. Mike Evans, Costa Mesa, stated that many areas on the Westside would benefit from the recommendations made by Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor regarding the West 19th Street Revitalization Overlay Zone. Eric Bever, Costa Mesa, discussed mixed use in residential zones, and thought that Council should pursue changing the code to apply to any MG (General Industrial) area. He also asked about the bluff rezoning, confirming that the Community Redevelopment Action Committee (C.R.A.C.) had provided a recommendation to move forward with this action. Ralph Ronquillo, Costa Mesa, clarified that the bridge initiative, and the rezone initiative, did not get a full consensus from C.R.A.C. Judi Berry, Costa Mesa, inquired as to what is accomplished with this report. Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor stated that it is for staff, and W.R.O.C. to review and forward to the Planning Commission for further direction. MOTION/Provided On motion by Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor, seconded by Council Direction to Staff Member Scheafer, and carried 4-0, staff was authorized to move forward with the objectives, inclusive of those items recommended by Mayor Pro Temi Mansoor, with the Westside Community Improvement Work Plan, to work in conjunction with W.R.O.C. and the Planning Commission in providing recommendations to the City Council, that Items - 1.4 and 2.4 of the Westside Community Improvement Work Plan would be considered in the Budget for Fiscal Year 2004-2005, to revise Item No. 2.5 by removing "rescind", and to revise Item No. 2.1 to include MG (General Industrial) zones. CITY MANAGER'S The City Manager ; advised that the first meeting with the REPORT/Annexations representatives of the City of Newport Beach in regards to the annexation of the unincorporated lands within the City's sphere of influence would be held this week. COUNCIL COMMENTSNote Council Member Scheafer reminded the community to vote on Tuesday, March 2, 2004, and expressed his condolences to Council Member Council Member Cowan on the loss of her mother, which was Cowan echoed by Council Member Steel, Mayor Pro Tem Mansoor, and Mayor Monahan. City Council Meetings Mayor Monahan requested the City Manager to provide a discussion on the pros and cons of moving Council Meetings to Tuesdays. ADJOURNMENT The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 11:55 p.m. M ATTEST: DepuW City Clerk of -the City of Costa Mesa the[City of Costa Mesa 1