Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout- - Authorization of Staff Time to Prepare a - 1/19/2010CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: JANUARY 19, 2010 ITEM NO: - SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION OF STAFF TIME TO PREPARE A ONE-YEAR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE DEFERRAL PROGRAM DATE: JANUARY 7, 2010 FROM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PRESENTATION BY: MEL LEE, SENIOR PLANNER KIMBERLY BRANDT, ACTING DEVELOPMENT SVS. DIRECTOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MEL LEE, 714-754-5611 mlee(a_ci.costa-mesa.ca.us RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council authorize and direct staff to prepare a one-year development Impact Fee Deferral Program. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Council Policy 300-6 requires Council authorization of work assignments which involve more than 4 hours of staff time. At the December 14, 2009 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission considered a report prepared by staff, at the Commission's request, presenting various alternatives for a possible development fee waiver and/or development impact fee deferral program. The intent of an Impact Fee Deferral Program is to encourage new development within the community during the economic downturn. Of the alternatives presented in the report, the Commission recommended a one- year program similar to ones adopted by other Orange County Cities in 2008 (see Attachment 1). This program involves deferral of development impact fees (i.e., traffic impact fees, parkland impact fees, etc.), from payment at time of issuance of building permits (before construction of the project begins) to either one of the following: 1. The end of the project construction (usually prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building) or; 2. One year from the date of issuance of building permits, whichever occurs sooner. While impact fees will still be collected, the intent is to defer collection of the fee at the time of issuance of building permits for the project. Planning Commission also considered waiver of user fees (i.e. building permit fees, plan check fees, inspection fees, etc.) for 'residential projects to stimulate new 'development. However, given the financial implications of the loss of revenue for fee waivers, Commission: was not interested in developing a fee waiver program at this time. A copy of the reports and meeting minutes excerpts are attached to this memo for reference. In order for staff to properly research the impact fee deferral programs put in place by other Orange County cities and prepare an ordinance for the City of Costa Mesa, it is estimated that 40 to 60 hours of staff time would be required. In accordance with City Council Policy 300-6, Council authorization is necessary for any work activity that will require more than four hours of staff time. ALTERNATIVES: City Council may consider the following alternatives: 1. Authorize and direct staff to develop a one-year development impact fee deferral program as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Do not authorize "and direct staff to prepare a one-year development impact fee deferral program. FISCAL REVIEW: Staff estimates that between 40 to 60 hours would be needed to contact the other Orange County cities that have similar impact fee deferral programs and to structure an Impact Fee Deferral Program for Council consideration. At this time, staff is unable to provide an estimate as to what impact an Impact Fee Deferral Program will have on the City's fiscal budget. If the authorization is approved, staff will provide research and determine what effect, if any, deferral of these fees would have on the City budget. LEGAL REVIEW: No legal review is required on this item. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: No environmental review is required on this item. z CONCLUSION: Planning Commission recommended the implementation of an Impact Fee Deferral Program comparable to other Orange County Cities to encourage new development within the community during the economic downturn. A(Z MEL LEE, AICP Senior Planner KIMBERLY BRANO, AICP Acting Development Svs. Director Attachments: 1. Table of O.C. Cities with Impact Fee Deferral Programs 2. Planning Commission Reports and Correspondence 3. Planning Commission Minute Excerpts of December 14, 2009 4. City Council Policy 300-6 Distribution: City Manager Asst. City Manager City Attorney Public Services Director City Clerk (2) Staff (4) File (2) File: 0119101m actFeeDeferralAuth I Date: 010610 1 Time: 3:30 .m. 3 ATTACHMENTI Summary of Impact Fee Deferral Programs Summary of Jurisdiction Development Impact Program Fee Deferral Programs Deferral Amount Per Unit (Maximum) in Other Orange Approval Date County Jurisdictions Expiration Date Extension Date Orange (City) Permanent Deferral $13,000.00 April 2008 None N/A Orange (County) 1 Year Deferral $40,000.00 May 2008 May 2009 May 2010 Irvine 1 Year Deferral $33,000.00 July 2008 July 2009 18 Months Anaheim 2 Year Deferral $10,000.00 July 2008 July 2010 N/A Mission Viejo Permanent Deferral $20,000.00 July 2008 None N/A OC San. Dist. 1 Year Deferral $5,000.00 July 2008 July 2009 July 2010 Santa Ana 1 Year Deferral $15,852.00 August 2008 October 2009 Pending Tustin 1 Year Deferral Based on Density October 2008 N/A Pending Huntington Beach 1 Year Deferral $30,000.00 December 2008 December 2009 Pending Anaheim Union High School Dist. 1 Year Deferral I Based on Sq. Ft. and Unit Count December 2008 N/A Pending N/A — Not Applicable Source: BIA/OC Survey, November 2009 y December 14, 2009 James Righeimer, Chair Planning Commission City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 ATTACHMENT 2 RE: Deferral of collection timing for development impact fees. Chairman Righeimer, I am writing on behalf of the membership of the Building Industry Association Southern California, Orange County Chapter (BLVOC) to request that the Planning Commission support collection timing deferral of development impact fees until the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for all residential construction. As you know, the housing industry in Orange County is facing troubling times in this distressed market. The sharp decline of the housing market has had sweeping effects on the overall economy in Orange County. The financial strains that our members are enduring have forced massive layoffs over the last year. According to the Construction Industry Research Board (CIRB), business activity in Orange County related to residential development was over $5 billion in 2006; in 2007 that number dropped to just under $4 billion, and in 2008 those figures have plunged to little over $400 million in by the end of July 2009. Negative trends continue to spiral downward. BIA has identified an opportunity to partner with local jurisdictions to offer some economic stimulus to home builders during these challenging times; development impact fee deferral. This program has been adopted by more than 75 jurisdictions throughout California and continues to be a benefit to our struggling industry. Fee collection at the front end of the construction process creates a tremendous financial burden to the private sector that can easily be relieved. Deferral of development impact fees will serve as a tremendous stimulus action that will send a clear message that the City of Costa Mesa is committed to partnering with private industry to ensure economic recovery. We respectfully urge Commissioners to amend the timing of collection of development impact fees until the time at which certificates of occupancy are issued. Our membership is committed working collectively with your city in order to get through this unprecedented market shift. We remain a resource to all levels of government on the important issues related to the prosperity of our local communities. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Respectfully, Kristine E. Thalman. Chief Executive Officer Cc. Planning Commission Khanh Nguyen, Chief Building Official Mel Lee, Planning Department 6— Orange County Chapter Building Industry Association of Southern California 17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170 Irvine, California. 92614 949.553.9500 fax 949.553.9507 www.biaoc.com www.modelliometour.org Your industry's comprehensive online guide to new homes PRESIDENT DAVID GREMINGER FIELDSTONE COMMUNITIES VICE PRESIDENT PAULJOHNSON RANCHO MISSION VIEJO 2ND VICE PRESIDENT DEBRA PEMBER TREASURER DAVE BARTLETT BROOKFIELD HOMES SECRETARY PAULHERNANDEZ THE IRVINE COMPANY IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIIDENT TIM McSUNAS THE SHOPOFF GROUP TRADE CONTRACTOR COUNCIL V.P. JIM YATES GOLDEN WEST PLUMBING ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT LAER PEARCE LAER PEARCE & ASSOCIATES MEMBER -AT -LARGE BILL WATT BAYWOOD DEVELOPMENT MEMBER -AT -LARGE ANDY BERNSTEIN JACKSON,DEMARCO, TIDUS & PECKENPAUGH KRISTINE THALMAN CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER -TT.aa. City of Costa Mesa Inter Office Memorandum TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: MEL LEE, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2009 SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT USER FEE WAIVER/IMPACT FEE DEFERRAL PROGRAMS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 14, 2009 Attached is an updated Table A: Comparison of Development User Fees and Impact Fees, reflecting the following changes: • Costa Mesa's grading permit fee was revised to reflect the correct per unit amount (the amount in the previous table was for the entire development); • Irvine's building and grading permit fees were revised to reflect the correct per unit amount; • Drainage impact fees were added where appropriate. Additionally, for clarification, this table makes a distinction between user fees (building permits, grading permits, etc.) that can be waived and impact fees (traffic, parkland, and drainage fees) that can be deferred. Attachment: Revised Table A cc: Acting Development Services Director Deputy City Attorney City Engineer Fire Protection Analyst Staff (4) File (2) 9 Table A Comparison of Development User Fees and Impact Fees (Revised) Fee Costa Mesa Fountain Huntington .. Category Planning $1,760.00 $3,830.00 $4,415.00 $10,000 $5,000.00 Deposit; Deposit; $128.00/hr $160.00/hr Building Plan $1,159.00 $1,042.00 $1,808.00 $104.00 $979.27 Check (Per Unit) (Per Unit) (Per Unit) Per Unit (Per Unit) User Fee Building Permit $1,783.35 $1,604.00 $2,288.00 $830.00 $1,360.10 User Fee Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Grading Permit 100.0 $300.00 $176.12 $115.00 $740.00 User Fee Per Unit (Per Unit) (Per Unit) Per Unit (Per Unit) Traffic Impact Fee Varies $1,485.00 $1,956.00 Varies Varies Based on $0.00 to (Per Unit) (Per Unit) Based on Project Location $181.00 Project Per Average Location Daily Tri $13,572.00 $7,421.49 $6,700.00 $7,350.00 $26,125.00 Parkland Impact Per Single- (Per Unit) (Per Unit) (Per Unit) (Per Unit) Fee Family Unit $13,829.00 Per Multi - Family Unit Draina_pe Impact $1,257.00 Per Unit 305.00 Per Unit N/A N/A $201.00 Per Unit Fee Source: BIA/OC Land Development Fee Survey 2009-2010 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Im. a MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2009 ITEM NUMBER: SUBJECT: PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT USER FEE WAIVER/IMPACT FEE DEFERRAL PROGRAMS DATE: DECEMBER 3, 2009 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MEL LEE, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER (714) 754-5611 (mlee(d-ci.costa-mesa.camE) DESCRIPTION The objectives of this report are twofold: 1. Receive direction from the Planning Commission to request City Council authorization of staff work activity on a User Fee Waiver/Impact Fee Deferral Program. 2. Obtain Commission feedback on which fee relief options (Options A through D) should be further evaluated in the User Fee Waiver/Impact Fee Deferral Program. RECOMMENDATION Provide direction as noted above. MEL LEE, AICP Senior Planner 0 i Ow i k �: Y � La 6je! KHANH NGUY Acting Asst. Developmen Svs. Director 1 Fee Waiver/Fee Deferral Programs BACKGROUND Commissioners McCarthy and Mensinger requested information regarding possible options for fee waiver and fee deferral programs to be considered by City Council. This report also provides different options for a proposed User Fee Waiver/Impact Fee, Deferral Program, based on background information -on'. the City's current fees, fees from surrounding cities, and any other user fee waiver/impact fee 'deferral programs from' surrounding cities currently in place. If Planning Commission selects an option for further evaluation, staff will request Council authorization to initiate the subsequent work activity to develop a program for the selected option. Pursuant to Council Policy 300-6, Council authorization is necessary for any work activity that will require more than four hours of staff time. ANALYSIS Current City Fee Summary The Building Industry Association of Southern California, Orange County Chapter (BIA/OC) conducts an annual Land Development Fee Survey of Orange County Cities. The fees are based on a hypothetical 50 -unit subdivision development. The typical 2009-2010 development fees for Costa Mesa and surrounding cities, based on this hypothetical scenario, is summarized in the table on the following page. The complete fee survey results for the below cities is attached to this report for reference. Fee Waiver/Fee Deferral Programs Table A Comparison of Development User Fees and Impact Fees Previous User Fee Waiver/Impact Fee Deferral Programs in Costa Mesa If a developer requests a waiver of a user fee or the deferral of an impact fee, the request is forwarded to City Council for approval. To date, a request for a fee waiver or deferral has never been denied by the City Council. In addition to individual requests, the City also initiated user fee waiver programs in relation to the Residential Remodeling Incentive Programs (RRIP) in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008. The purpose of these programs was to encourage reinvestment in residences within the community. The City also initiated the Build Green Fee Waiver and Rebate Program in 2007 and 2008. Current Fee Waiver/Deferral Programs in Other Cities A summary of existing impact fee deferral programs in other cities, based on a survey conducted by BIA/OC, is summarized in the table on the following page. /0 Costa Mesa Fountain Valley HuntingtonFee .. Category Planning $1,760.00 $3,830.00 $4,415.00 $10,000 $5,000.00 Deposit; Deposit; $128.00/hr $160.00/hr Building Plan Check $1,159.00 $1,042.00 $1,808.00 $62.50 $979.27 User Fee Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Building Permit $1,783.35 $1,604.00 $2,288.00 $830.00 $1,360.10 User Fee Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Grading Permit $3,372.05 $300.00 $176.12 $37.00 $740.00 User Fee Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Traffic Impact Fee Varies $1,485.00 $1,956.00 Varies Varies Based on $0.00 to (Per Unit) (Per Unit) Based on Project Location $181.00 Project Per Average Location Daily Tri $13,572.00 $7,421.49 $6,700.00 $7,350.00 $26,125.00 Parkland Impact Per Single- (Per Unit) (Per Unit) (Per Unit) (Per Unit) Fee Family Unit $13,829.00 Per Multi - I Family Unit Source: BIA/OC Land DevelODment Fee Survev 2009-2010 Previous User Fee Waiver/Impact Fee Deferral Programs in Costa Mesa If a developer requests a waiver of a user fee or the deferral of an impact fee, the request is forwarded to City Council for approval. To date, a request for a fee waiver or deferral has never been denied by the City Council. In addition to individual requests, the City also initiated user fee waiver programs in relation to the Residential Remodeling Incentive Programs (RRIP) in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008. The purpose of these programs was to encourage reinvestment in residences within the community. The City also initiated the Build Green Fee Waiver and Rebate Program in 2007 and 2008. Current Fee Waiver/Deferral Programs in Other Cities A summary of existing impact fee deferral programs in other cities, based on a survey conducted by BIA/OC, is summarized in the table on the following page. /0 Fee Waiver/Fee Deferral Programs Table B Summary of Impact Fee Deferral Programs of DevelopmentSummary ..ct Fee Deferral Programs in Other Orange Jurisdiction Program Deferral Amount Per Unit Maximum Approval Date Expiration Date Extension Date Orange Cit Permanent Deferral $13,000.00 Aril 2008 None N/A Orange Count 1 Year Deferral $40,000.00 May 2008 May 2009 May 2010 Irvine 1 Year Deferral $33,000.00 July 2008 July 2009 18 Months Anaheim 2 Year Deferral $10,000.00 July 2008 July 2010 N/A Mission Viejo Permanent Deferral $20,000.00 July 2008 None N/A OC San. Dist. 1 Year Deferral $5,000.00 July 2008 Jul 2009 July 2010 Santa Ana 1 Year Deferral $15,852.00 August 2008 October 2009 Pending Tustin 1 Year Deferral Based on Density October 2008 N/A Pending Huntington Beach 1 Year Deferral $30,000.00 December 2008 December 2009 Pending Anaheim Union High School Dist. 1 Year Deferral Based on Sq. Ft. and Unit Count December 2008 N/A Pending N/A — Not Applicable Source: BIA/OC Survey, November 2009 Options for a User Fee Waiver/Impact Deferral Program Possible additional fee waiver/deferral programs for Costa Mesa may include the following: • Option A: One Year Impact Fee Deferral Program. Description: This program involves deferral of development impact fees (i.e., traffic impact fees, parkland impact fees, etc.). Cities with this program: See above table. Fiscal implications to Costa Mesa: No immediate fiscal implications due to the deferral of the impact fees to a later date in the development process, (i.e., project completion) the City does not lose any interest on deferred impact fees. • Option B: User Fee Waiver Program. Description: This program could consist of a temporary waiver of planning application processing fees, building plan check/inspection fees, etc. Cities with this program: None. Fiscal implications to Costa Mesa: Varies. Also, the City loses the interest earned when the fees are waived. Additionally, waiver of planning application fees, permit fees, plan check fees, inspection fees, etc. would range in the amount of $4,350.00 to $4,500.00 per unit for a new two -unit residential condominium development. // 1 � i Fee Waiver/Fee Deferral Programs Option C: Combination User Fee Waiver and Impact Fee Deferral Program Description: This program could be a combination of fee -deferrals and fee waivers. In addition, this program could also..be restricted to the Westside Revitalization area, new condominium projects, &'-new residential condominium conversion projects in order to promote redevelopment. Cities with this program: None. Fiscal implications to Costa Mesa: See Options A and B above. • Option D: Performance Based Fee Structure. Description: The program could include possible disincentives for allowing building permits to expire. Currently, building permits expire within six months of issuance unless a City inspection is completed. An inspection will extend the valid date of the building permit for an additional six months. Expired permits may be renewed with minimal financial cost. Cities with this program: None known at this time, based on preliminary research. In the Cities surveyed by staff, there were no existing "disincentive" programs that would apply a financial penalty for allowing permits to expire. Fiscal implications to Costa Mesa: Not known at this time. CONCLUSION: If Planning Commission selects an above option for further evaluation, staff will request Council authorization to initiate the subsequent work activity to develop a program for the selected option. Attachments: 1. BIA/OC Land Development Fee Survey 2009-2010 for Costa Mesa and Surrounding Cities cc: Acting Development Services Director Deputy City Attorney City Engineer Fire Protection Analyst Staff (4) File (2) File: 121409FeeWaiverPro rams I Date: 120309 1 Time: 10:30 a.m. 1z BIA/OC LAND DEVELOPMENT FEE SURVEY 2009-2010 City of Costa Mesa P.O. Box 1200,77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 FEE CATEGORY PER UNIT RATE PER UNIT RATE PER (If applicable) 7 NOTES ENVIRONMENTAL Contact: endy Shih (7 4) 754-5136 Negative Declaration $20.20 $1,010 or (if needed) total consultant estimate plus 10% EIR Processing (minor/major) Total consultant estimate plus 10% Initial Determination 0 Fiscal Impact Analysis Fee 0 Traffic Impact Analysis Fee 0 Local Coastal Plan N/A Environmental Assessment Included in Neg. Dec. or EIR Categorical Exemption 0 PLANNING Contact: Wendy Shih 714) 754-5136 General Plan Amendment $91.20 $1,000 for screening plus $3,560 for GPA= $4,560 Zoning Map Amendment See "Zone Change" Development Code Agreement N/A Development Agreement Time and materials with $5,000 minimum deposit Specific Plan Amendment $41.80 $2,090 if amendment required Master Plan $35.20 $1,760 Zone Chane $38.20 $1,910 Tentative Tract Ma $28.90 $1,445 Filing Included in map fee Revise Approved Map $28.90 $1,445 if revision requires Planning Commission review Change Map See "Revise Approved Map" Conditional Use Permits/Variances N/A Major N/A Minor N/A Extension N/A Site Plan Review Included in "Master Plan" review Design Review Included in "Master Plan" review Preliminary Plan Review N/A Variance N/A Appeals $13.80 $690 BUILDING -EDITION Contact: Building Division (714) 754-5273 Building — Building Plan Review $1,159.18 Permit Issuance Fee $1,783.35 Building permit fees based on the 1997 Uniform Administrative Code UAC Table 3-A Permit and Inspection Fee Included with the building permit Misc. Fees N/A /3 Valuation $240,720. $92.40 for Building permit fees based on 00 dwelling the 1997 Uniform Administrative .$24.30 for Code (UAC) Table 3-A garage Plan Check See plan review Extension N/A Re -Roofing N/A Electrical - Permit Issuance Fee $181.20 Fees based on 1997 UAC Table 3-B Permit Inspection Fee Included with the electrical permit Residential Buildings Included with the electrical permit Commercial Buildings N/A Plan Review Fee Included with the building plan review fee Power Apparatus Included with the electrical permit Services N/A Inspection Fee Included with the electrical permit After Hours N/A Mechanical - $70.45 Fees based on 1997 UAC Table 3-C ( based on number of fixtures provided in the study criteria Inspection Fee Included with the mechanical permit After Hours Included with the mechanical permit Heating Included with the mechanical permit Air Circulation Included with the mechanical permit Air Distribution Included with the mechanical permit Combustion Vent Included with the mechanical permit Chimney Included with the mechanical permit Compression Boiler Included with the mechanical permit Evaporative Cooler Included with the mechanical permit Absorption Included with the mechanical permit Plumbing - Inspection Fee $166.60 Fees based on 1997 UAC Table 3-D( based on number of fixtures provided in the study criteria Plumbing Fixtures Included with the plumbing permit sy Fire Sprinkler Installation $100 plus $2 per head. Includes 2 inspections. Gas Piping Included with the plumbing permit Plan Review Included with the plumbing permit Inspection Fee (after hours) $102.46 Per Hour Gradin - Permit Fee $3,372.05 Fee for the full 10 acres Plan Check & Inspection Fee $2,191.84 Geotechnical Review Fee included SMIP $24.07 Attached to building permit fee Energy Included with the building permit Issuance N/A Landscape 0 Planning - part of plan check Model Home/ Repeat Tract Discount N/A Onsite Improvement Included with the grading permit WATER Portable Water Assessed by Mesa Consolidated Water District (949) 631-1200 or Irvine Ranch Water District (949) 453-5300 Reclaimed Service Call Fee Construction Water Meter Water Supply Faculties Fee Waterline Assessment Fee Water Annexation Fee Water (Hydrology) Studies ENGINEERING & SUBDIVISION Contact: Gary Wong (714) 754-5671 Final Tract Map Check (Avg. 10 hrs X $90/hr =$900) $900 divide by 50 units _ $18/unit Basic rate $90/hour Storm Drain ($6,283/ac re X 10 acres $62,830) Divide by 50 units = $1257/unit Based on "low density residential " Street Improvement $280,000 divide by 50 units = $5600/unit Based on $280k for Site Improvement from "Study Criteria" Grading See Building -Grading above Offsite Plan Check (Avg. 10 hrs X $90/h r =$900 Basic rate $90/hr /-Ir $900 divide by 50 units _ $18/unit Public Works Plan Check See "Offsite Plan Check" above Lot line Adjustment $800 Per Planning fee schedule Building Addressing 0 Assignment by Planning CAPITAL FACILITIES & CONNECTIONS Sewer Assessed by Sanitary District (949) 645-8400 Maintenance & Inspection Fee Line Assessment Studies Sanitation District Annex. Other Traffic Impact/ Road fees $74,224 By Transportation Services Park Facilities In — Lieu $13,572 Landscape Inspection Fee 0 Part of plan check SCHOOL FACILITIES School District(s): $4,600 $1.84 per square foot for Newport Mesa Unified School District $6,575 $2.63 per square foot for Santa Ana Unified School District SIGN FEES Sign Permit Fee N/A Abandonment of Signs N/A Temporary Banner Permit N/A OTHER FEES In -lieu Affordable Housing Fee N/A Transportation Corridor $3,417 Assessed by San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency //O BIA/OC LAND DEVELOPMENT FEE SURVEY 2009-2010 City of Fountain Valley 10200 Slater Avenue, C-8030 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 FEE CATEGORY PER UNIT RATE PER UNIT RATE MULTIFAMILY If applicable) NOTES ENVIRONMENTAL Negative Declaration $3,425.00 EIR Processing minor/major Cost + 15% Initial Determination $1,455.00 Fiscal Impact Analysis Fee Public Works Traffic Impact Analysis Fee Public Works Local Coastal Plan N/A Environmental Assessment N/A Categorical Exemption $495.00 PLANNING General Plan Amendment $9265.00 Zoning Map Amendment N/A See Zone Change Development Code Agreement N/A See Development A reement Development Agreement $7,460.00 Specific Plan Amendment $5,495.00 Master Plan $3,830.00 Precise Plan Zone Chane $4,795.00 Tentative Tract Ma $4,580.00 Filing N/A Revise Approved Ma N/A Change Ma N/A Conditional Use Permits/Variances $3,455.00 New CUP Major $2,415.00 CUP Modification Minor $330.00 CUP Transfer Extension $850.00 Site Plan Review $3,830.00 Precise Plan Design Review $1,645.00 Development Review Preliminary Plan Review N/A Variance $2,960 (major), $770 minor Appeals $2,280.00 BUILDING -EDITION 2007 CBC Building — Building Plan Review 1042.60 Permit Issuance Fee 15.00 Permit and Inspection Fee 1604.00 Misc. Fees 7.00 Valuation 166,850 Plan Check OTHER DEAPRTMENTS 235.10 Extension No fee Re -Roofing 17 Electrical Permit Issuance Fee 15.00 Permit Inspection Fee 105.80 Residential Buildings Commercial Buildings Plan Review Fee 65% of permit fee Power Apparatus 13.80-41.41 Services 31.65-138.50 Inspection Fee After Hours 321.39- 357.07 Mechanical Inspection Fee 72.65 After Hours 321.39- 357.07 Heating 27.10 Air Circulation 27.10 Air Distribution 27.10 Combustion Vent 27.10 Chimney Included in building fee Compression Boiler 54.20 Evaporative Cooler 54.20 Absorption 54.20 Plumbing Inspection Fee 273.00 Plumbing Fixtures ' 21.00 Fire Sprinkler Installation n/a Gas Piping 21.00 Plan Review 65% of ermitfee Inspection Fee (after hours) 321.39- 357.07 Gradin Permit Fee $300.00 160.00 Plan Check & Inspection Fee $285.00 Plan check is hourly, inspection is $80 per hour Geotechnical Review Fee $750.00 1050.00 SMIP $16.69 Energy Issuance 15.00 Landscape 15.00 Model Home/ Repeat Tract Discount Onsite Improvement O. C. SANITATION DISTRICT $5,949.00 PER UNIT WATER Portable Water $1.71 Per Unit Reclaimed $.086 - $1.36 Per Unit Service Call Fee $75 Per Visit $150 for after hours Construction Water Meter $185 Plus $500 water usage deposit Water Supply Faculties Fee $137.47/DU Per %" meter Waterline Assessment Fee $4.65 Per frontage foot U Water Annexation Fee $697.27 Gross Acre Water (Hydrology) Studies ENGINEERING & SUBDIVISION Final Tract Map Check $16 $1,155 + reproduction Storm Drain $305 Flat fee Street Improvement $255 $255 for 1St 50 L. F. Gradin Offsite Plan Check Deposit Deposit determined by staff Public Works Plan Check Lot line Adjustment $685 $685 — per lot line adjustment CAPITAL FACILITIES & CONNECTIONS Sewer $931/DU Depends on size Maintenance & Inspection Fee Line Assessment Studies Sanitation District Annex. Other Traffic Impact/ Road fees $1,485 Each traffic stud Park Facilities In — Lieu $7,421.49 Per residential unit Landscape Inspection Fee $380 min $230 + $150 per sheet SCHOOL FACILITIES School District(s): Garden Grove Unified School District $7425.00 RES. $2.97 SF Huntington Beach Union H.S. $7425.00 RES. $2.97 SF SIGN FEES Sign Permit Fee BASED ON VALUATION Abandonment of Signs TemporaryBanner Permit OTHER FEES Development Mitigation Impact Fee $5,339 3% of building valuation /9 BIA/OC LAND DEVELOPMENT FEE SURVEY 2009-2010 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 FEE CATEGORY PER UNIT RATE PER UNIT RATE MULTIFAMILY If applicable) NOTES ENVIRONMENTAL Negative Declaration $51.48 $2,574 EIR Processing (minor/major) $1,598.80+ costs $79,940 + consultant costs Initial Determination n/a Fiscal Impact Analysis Fee n/a Traffic Impact Analysis Fee Local Coastal Plan $52.83 $5,283 CDP -50% w CUP Environmental Assessment $170.88 $8,544 Categorical Exemption $4.16 $208 PLANNING General Plan Amendment $745.26 $37,263 major Zoning Map Amendment $303.26 $15,163 Major Development Code Agreement n/a Development Agreement $609.64 $30,482 + costs Specific Plan Amendment $78.20 $3,910 EPA Master Plan n/a Zone Chane ZMA/GPA) Tentative Tract Ma $452.66 $21,133 +$30/lot Filing Revise Approved Ma Change Ma Conditional Use Permits/Variances Major $159.84 $7,992 Minor Extension $7.70 $385 Site Plan Review i $88.30 $4,415 Design Review $18.10 $905 Preliminary Plan Review $50.76 $2,538 half applied to a Variance $34.53 $3,453 50% with CUP Appeals $54.08 $2,704 General Plan Maintenance Fee -- new $185 $1.85 per $1,000 valuation BUILDING -EDITION Building — Building Plan Review $1,808 Production unit 26 % _ $470 Permit Issuance Fee $31.20 Permit and Inspection Fee $2,288 50 units = $114,436 Misc. Fees Valuation $257,163 Plan Check $1,596 Extension $104 Re -Roofing n/a Electrical Permit Issuance Fee $31.20 g0 %i✓1-714 Gi'�31�' r��tr� C, I°f" Permit Inspection Fee Residential Buildings $140.92 Per study criteria Commercial Buildings $140.92 Per study criteria Plan Review Fee $105.69 Power Apparatus - n/a Services - n/a Inspection Fee $0.12/SF Included in above After Hours $125/hr Mechanical Inspection Fee $214.24 Per study criteria After Hours $125/hr Heating $62.40 Air Circulation $32.24 Air Distribution $32.24 Combustion Vent $32.24 Chimney $32.24 Compression Boiler $67.60 Evaporative Cooler $32.24 Absorption - Plumbin Inspection Fee $214.24 Per study criteria Plumbing Fixtures $29.12/each Fire Sprinkler Installation - Gas Piping $26.00 Plan Review $265.57 Inspection Fee after hours $125.00 Gradin Permit Fee $176.12 Plan Check & Inspection Fee $97.17 Geotechnical Review Fee n/a SMIP $25.72 Energy $11.00 Building Standards Fee Issuance Landscape $495.00 Model Home/ Repeat Tract Discount $470.00 Production unit 26 % _ $470 Onsite Improvement WATER Portable Water - Reclaimed - Service Call Fee - Construction Water Meter Water Supply Faculties Fee $5,059.00 Waterline Assessment Fee - Water Annexation Fee - Water (Hydrology) Studies $85.38 ENGINEERING.& SUBDIVISION Final Tract Map Check $41.66 Storm Drain Incl. in PW plan ck fee Street Improvement Incl. in PW plan ck fee Grading Incl. in PW plan ck fee Offsite Plan Check Incl. in PW plan ck fee ez/ Public Works Plan Check $325.16 Lot line Adjustment Building Addressing CAPITAL FACILITIES & CONNECTIONS Sewer $1,973.00 Maintenance & Inspection Fee - Line Assessment - Studies $92.58 Assume $40/hr plan ck Fee Sanitation District Annex. - Other Traffic Impact/ Road fees $1,956/DU 12 trips/DU @ $163/tri Park Facilities In — Lieu $6,700 $335,000 + appraisal cost Landscape Inspection Fee $235.00 SCHOOL FACILITIES School District(s): Huntington Beach Union H.S. District SIGN FEES Sign Permit Fee N/A Abandonment of Signs N/A Temporary Banner Permit $1.56 $78 OTHER FEES Library Fee Downtown Specific Plan $166.20 $831/acre Final Tract -Planning $31.40 $1,570 Landscape Plan Check - Included above Addressing $20.08 $1,004/project Ozz BIA/OC LAND DEVELOPMENT FEE SURVEY 2009-2010 City of Irvine P.O. Box 19575, One Civic Center Plaza Irvine, CA 92623 FEE CATEGORY PER UNIT RATE PER UNIT RATE MULTIFAMILY If applicable) NOTES ENVIRONMENTAL Negative Declaration Varies $30,000 deposit for EIR, separate contract if EIR is required. Negative declaration and categorical exemption included in case below. EIR Processing minor/major N/A Initial Determination N/A Fiscal Impact Analysis Fee N/A Traffic Impact Analysis Fee N/A Local Coastal Plan N/A Environmental Assessment N/A Categorical Exemption N/A PLANNING Contact: Steve Weiss General Plan Amendment $12,000 deposit; $128.00/hr Zoning Ma Amendment N/A Development Code Agreement N/A Development Agreement $10,000 deposit; $128.00/hr Specific Plan Amendment N/A Master Plan $10,000 deposit; $128.00/hr Zone Chane $12,000 deposit; $128.00/hr Tentative Tract Ma Filing $4,000 deposit; $128.00/hr Revise Approved Ma N/A Change Ma N/A Conditional Use Permits/Variances Major $12,000 deposit; $128.00/hr Minor $1,500 deposit; $128.00/hr Extension $1,500 deposit; $128.00/hr Site Plan Review N/A Design Review N/A Preliminary Plan Review N/A Variance $1,500 deposit; $128.00/hr Appeals $245 deposit; $128.00/hr BUILDING -EDITION 2007 CBC Contact: Eric Tolles Building — Building Plan Review $62.50 Standard production rate. Model plan check $1044 ea. Permit Issuance Fee $37.00 Flat fee Permit and Inspection Fee $830.75 Includes all electrical, mechanical and plumbing fees Misc. Fees $50.00 Slurry seal for road wear & tear Valuation $166,850 Based on study criteria Plan Check Extension Re -Roofing $129.00 Residential Electrical $0 Included in permit fees Permit Issuance Fee Permit Inspection Fee Residential Buildings Commercial Buildings Plan Review Fee Power Apparatus Services Inspection Fee After Hours Mechanical $0 Included in permit fees Inspection Fee After Hours Heating Air Circulation Air Distribution Combustion Vent Chimney Compression Boiler Evaporative Cooler Absorption Plumbing $0 Included in permit fees Inspection Fee ,Plumbing Fixtures Fire Sprinkler Installation Gas Piping Plan Review Inspection Fee after hours $120.00 Per hour Gradin Permit Fee $37.00 Issuance fee Plan Check & Inspection Fee $115 plan check, $260 ins ection Plan check: $575.00/ac. Inspection: $1300.00/ac. Includes WQMP review. Geotechnical Review Fee N/A SMIP $23.60 Based on valuation of $166.850 Energy $68.25 Plan check, inspection $111.00 Issuance $37.00 Flat fee Landscape Based on acreage of landscape area $1247.00/ac Model Home/ Repeat Tract Discount Yes See plan check above Onsite Improvement N/A WATER Contact IRWD Portable Water IRWD Contact IRWD Reclaimed, IRWD Contact IRWD of Service Call Fee IRWD Contact IRWD Construction Water Meter IRWD Contact IRWD Water Supply Faculties Fee IRWD Contact IRWD Waterline Assessment Fee IRWD Contact IRWD Water Annexation Fee IRWD Contact IRWD Water (Hydrology) Studies $36.40 $182.00/ac ENGINEERING & SUBDIVISION Contact: Mark Carroll Final Tract Map Check $278.60 41 to 100 Lot/Parcel: $ 12,900.00 + $103 per lot over 40 lots Storm Drain $24.00 Based on 600 LF or 24" drain Street Improvement Plan check: $1345.00/ac., Inspection: $2441.00/ac. Grading See under Gradin Offsite Plan Check See street improvement Public Works Plan Check Lot line Adjustment $3508.00 per submittal Building Addressing Part of tentative map process CAPITAL FACILITIES & CONNECTIONS Sewer IRWD Contact IRWD Maintenance & Inspection Fee IRWD Contact IRWD Line Assessment IRWD Contact IRWD Studies IRWD Contact IRWD Sanitation District Annex. Contact IRWD Other Traffic Impact/ Road fees Transportation Corridor Agency Fee and other traffic impact fee depended on location of the project. Park Facilities (In — Lieu) $7350.00 Only applies if In -Lieu option chosen Landscape Inspection Fee Based on acreage of landscape area $1810.00/ac. up to 10 ac. SCHOOL FACILITIES $13,300 2500 livable square feet 5.32 per square foot. School District(s): Irvine, Tustin, Santa Ana, Saddleback SIGN FEES Sign Permit Fee $123.00/si n Abandonment of Signs Temporary Banner Permit $18.00/application + $26.00 Inspection fee OTHER FEES Systems Development $1668.50 Based on 1 % of valuation of $166,850 Orange County Fire Authority Contact OCFA OS BIA/OC LAND DEVELOPMENT FEE SURVEY 2009-2010 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92658 FEE CATEGORY PER UNIT RATE PER UNIT RATE MULTIFAMILY If applicable) NOTES ENVIRONMENTAL Negative Declaration $160/hour $750 deposit) EIR Processing minor/major $160/hour $750 deposit) Initial Determination $160/hour $750 deposit) Fiscal Impact Analysis Fee $160/hour $750 deposit) Traffic Impact Analysis Fee $160/hour $750 deposit) Local Coastal Plan $160/hour $750 deposit) Environmental Assessment $160/hour $750 deposit) Categorical Exemption $160/hour $750 deposit) PLANNING General Plan Amendment $160/hour $5,000 deposit) Zoning Map Amendment $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Development Code Agreement $160/hour $1,500 deposit) Development Agreement $160/hour $5,000 deposit) Specific Plan Amendment $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Master Plan $160/hour $5,000 deposit) Zone Chane $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Tentative Tract Ma $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Filing $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Revise Approved Ma $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Change Ma $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Conditional Use Permits/Variances Major $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Minor $1,920.00 Extension $830.00 Site Plan Review $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Design Review $160/hour $1,500 deposit) Preliminary Plan Review n/a Variance $160/hour $2,200 deposit) Appeals $2,800 or $3,070 BUILDING -EDITION 2007 Building — Building Plan Review $979.27 Permit Issuance Fee ------------ Permit and Inspection Fee $1360.10 Misc. Fees ------------ Valuation $166,850 Plan Check Extension $50.00 Re -Roofing $206.20 Based on $10,000 valuation Electrical See breakdown below 0� Permit Issuance Fee $32.10 Permit Inspection Fee $95.21 Residential Buildings N/A Commercial Buildings, N/A Plan Review Fee $23.80 Power Apparatus $32.10 Services $36.70 Inspection Fee $95.21 After Hours $220.00 Mechanical See breakdown below Inspection Fee $68.00 After Hours $220.00 Heating $17.90 Air Circulation $12.50 Air Distribution $12.50 Combustion Vent $17.90 Chimney Compression Boiler $17.90 Evaporative Cooler $17.90 Absorption $17.90 Plumbing See.breakdown below Inspection Fee $136.01 Plumbing Fixtures $12.50 Per fixture Fire Sprinkler Installation $189.64 Based on $5,000 valuation Gas Piping $6.30 Plan Review $34.00 Inspection Fee after hours $220.00 Grading See breakdown below Permit Fee $740.00 Based on no c.y. cut or fill Plan Check & Inspection Fee $532.80 Geotechnical Review Fee $2,000 minimum SMIP $16.69 Ener $100.11 Issuance $32.10 Landscape N/A Model Home/ Repeat Tract Discount 25% $244.82 Onsite Improvement N/A WATER Portable Water N/A Reclaimed N/A Service Call Fee N/A Construction Water Meter $370/DU Water Meter & Connection Water Supply Faculties Fee N/A Waterline Assessment Fee N/A Water Annexation Fee N/A Water (Hydrology) Studies N/A ENGINEERING & SUBDIVISION Final Tract Map Check $3,270.00 o�7 Storm Drain 6.5% up to $100K, $8,680 + 5% from $100K to $400K, $28,710 + 4% over $400K, $350 min fee Street Improvement 6.5% up to $100K, $8,680 + 5% from $100K to $400K, $28,710 + 4% over $400K, $350 min fee Grading Approx $3000 Offsite Plan Check N/A Public Works Plan Check $120/hr Lot line Adjustment $1,019.70 Building Addressing N/A CAPITAL FACILITIES & CONNECTIONS Sewer $180/DU Connection Fee Maintenance & Inspection Fee Line Assessment Studies Sanitation District Annex. Other Traffic Impact/ Road fees S Park Facilities In — Lieu) 6 Landscape Inspection Fee Drainage SCHOOL FACILITIES School District(s): Newport Mesa Unified School District $4600.00 SIGN FEES Sign Permit Fee N/A Abandonment of Signs N/A Temporary Banner Permit $38.50 OTHER FEES Fair Share $1990/DU $1555 Traffic Fair Share Fee City of Costa Mesa Inter Office Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Hilda Veturis, Management Analyst 4AI, Date: November 24, 2009 Subject: Parkland, Traffic and Drainage Impact Fees This report is in response to the Planning Commission's request for information regarding various city fees including: parkland, traffic and drainage impact fees. Parkland Impact Fees This report will initially address parkland impact fees. Pursuant to Title 13 - Costa Mesa Zoning Code, Chapter XI, Subdivisions, Article 5 — Park and Recreation Dedications, parkland funds are collected for the purpose of providing recreational and leisure activities and services within a designated open space area in conjunction with residential subdivisions. Section 13-251 of that Article, specifically states, "Every residential subdivider who creates a subdivision shall be required to dedicate a portion of the land, pay a fee in lieu thereof, or do a combination of both, as established in this article for the purpose of providing park land and recreational facilities to serve future residents of the subdivision." Parkland impact fee are based on (1) current average park land acquisition costs of residential land for neighborhood and community parks; and, (2) the 2000 Census population density standards. Parkland fees only apply to new residential subdivisions. Parkland impact fees are not applicable to home remodeling, new home construction on an existing lot, or construction of apartments (excluding Sakioka Lot #1 pursuant to a development agreement), unless a subdivision map is needed. The table below describes residential projects required to pay parkland impact fees. SUBJECT to Parkland Impact Fees • New common -interest condominium subdivisions • New single-family "detached" subdivisions • New townhouse "attached" subdivisions • New LiveMork Units • New condominiums in mixed-use developments NOT SUBECT to Park Impact Fees • New apartments • Conversion of apartments to condominiums (unless new additional units are added) • Granny units and accessory apartments • Single-family home remodels or additions Parkland, Traffic, Drainage Impact Fees November 24, 09 Parkland impact fees are $13,572 per single-family residence and $13,829 per multi -family residence. The funds are spent in the areas related to where they were originally collected for direct benefit. The funds must be spent within five years of receipt. The following reflects where the funds have been spent over the past few years. Project Description Status Amount Spent Fairview Park 2525 Placentia Avenue 1. Area "D" Fairview Park Master Plan -(west 1. Construction Completed $266,000 side of park) D.G. Trails, gathering area, delineation fence, stairway access on bluff. 2. Wetlands Master Plan -(north side) Wetlands 2. Under Construction $247,000 and riparian areas restoration of lakes, cascades, decks and landscaping. Tewinkle Park 970 Arlington 3. Lake System New water filtration system of 3. Construction Completed $254,000 renovation and existing lakes with the renovation landscaping of lakes, cascades, decks and landscaping. 4. Sport complex New facility - baseball and softball 4. Construction Completed $154,000 fields. 5. Angels Playground New facility - 100% accessible 5. Construction Completed $130,000 playground and picnic areas. 6. Skate Park New facility - state of the art Skate _ 6. Construction Completed $471,000 Park for all ages. 7. Bark Park Lighting New lighting of existing Bark Park 7. Construction Completed $153,000 — light posts installation throughout park. Brentwood Park 1) Land purchase Planning/Design/Engineering 1) $3,571,000 265 E. Brentwood 2) Demolish structures, Master Plan, and Gradin 2) $178,000 Joann Bike Trail Landscaping and Beautification Planning/Design/Engineering $24,000 Athletic Field Install sports lighting Construction Completed $658,000 Li htin As of October 31, 2009 the amount available for future appropriations from the Park Development Fee Fund is $0. With the consideration of repayment to the General Fund for the purchase of parkland to expand Brentwood Park, the fund has no money available for future Park Developments at this time. Traffic Impact Fees Pursuant to Title 13 - Costa Mesa Zoning Code, Chapter XII, Special Fee Assessments, Article 3 — Transportation System Management, traffic fees are collected for the purpose of providing transportation/circulation improvements within the City of Costa Mesa which are related directly to the incremental traffic/vehicle burden imposed upon the City's transportation/circulation system by the development of new commercial, industrial and residential uses as permitted by 30 Parkland, Traffic, Drainage Impact Fees November 24, 09 the 2002 General Plan. As there is a need to improve and enhance the City's transportation network due to added traffic, there is a direct reasonable nexus between the amount of traffic impact fees charged and the impact the developer imposes on the system. As such, the new development projects paying the fee will receive a direct benefit from the transportation/circulation facilities funded by the fee. As approved by the City Council, the amount of traffic impact fee is $181.00 per each new average daily vehicle trip end generated by all new commercial, industrial and residential developments. Traffic impact fees can only be used for those transportation/circulation improvements and services identified in the updated 2009 Traffic Impact Fee Study and as shown in the City's General Plan. It is the responsibility of the Director of Public Services to annually review the fee amount to determine that it does not exceed the cost of transportation/circulation improvements to accommodate the traffic/vehicles generated by new commercial, industrial and residential development that pay the fee. The traffic impact fee for all new residential, commercial and industrial developments are assessed on an incremental basis as follows: Traffic Impact Fee Schedule Average Daily Trip Ends (ADT) Traffic Impact Fee 0 to 25 ADT $ 0/ADT 26 to 50 ADT for incremental trips exceeding 25 ADT $ 50/ADT 51 to 75 ADT for incremental trips exceeding 50 ADT $ 75/ADT 76 to 100 ADT for incremental trips exceeding 75 ADT $100/ADT > 100 ADT for incremental trips exceeding 100 ADT $181/ADT The above incremental assessment is also available for expansion or modification of existing residential, commercial and industrial developments. The applicable increment traffic impact fee is assessed on the increased number of average daily trips generated by the proposed project. Any project which generates 100 ADTs or more, and which expands or modifies the existing development, shall not receive a reduction in traffic impact fees or an incremental incentive. The following reflects where the funds have been spent over the past few years. Project Description Status Amount Spent 1. 1-405 NB Bristol Braid Joint City/Orange County Construction Completed $5,249,708 Transportation Authority (OCTA) project at 1-405/SR-55. This projects is for construction of braid structure between 1-405 Bristol Street Offramp and SR -55 SB/1-405 NB Connector Ram 2.1-405 Anton Boulevard Part of City/OCTA project for new Construction Completed $1,690,784 Onramp onramp to NB 1-405 from Anton Boulevard 3. Avenue of the Arts Part of City/OCTA project for new off- Construction Completed $325,854 Offramp ramp from NB 1-405 to Avenue of the Arts 3/ Parkland, Traffic, Drainage Impact Fees November 24, 09 4. Orange Avenue/17 Street Construction of right -turn lanes, bus turnouts, medians and landscape im rovements Construction Completed $316,713 5. Santa Ana Avenue/17 Construction of right -turn lanes, bus Construction Completed $310,665 Street turnouts, medians and landscape 1) Low Density improve rn nts $ 6,283 2) Medium Density 6. Harbor Boulevard/1-405 Construction of tieback wall, new NB Construction Completed $2,018,282 Improvements onramp lane between the wall and $10,052 Commercial/Industrial: columns, widening of Harbor $11,309 Boulevard At present, the following improvements are under design and will require use of the traffic impact fee funding for construction: • Harbor Boulevard — Adams Avenue: Widening of intersection to provide third eastbound left -turn lane and a second southbound right -turn lane. Estimated construction and right-of- way cost is $4.5 million. (Garfield Avenue/Gisler Avenue Santa Ana River Crossing (SARX) mitigation as well as General Plan project) • Harbor Boulevard — Wilson Street: Widening of intersection to provide a westbound right - turn lane. Estimated construction cost is $400,000 (General Plan project) • Bear Street — Baker Street: Widening of intersection to provide a third westbound through lane. Estimated construction cost is $300,000 (General Plan project) • East 17th Street — Irvine Avenue and Tustin Avenue: Widening of intersections to provide right -turn lanes, bus turnouts, medians and landscaping. Estimated construction cost is $1,200,000 (General Plan project) The City will use available traffic impact fees as a match to secure grant funds for the above projects. As of October 31, 2009 the amount available for future appropriations from the Traffic Impact Fees Fund is $3,158,169. Drainage Impact Fees The drainage impact fee is imposed pursuant to Titlel5, Chapter III of the City's Municipal Code on any new development or redevelopment project in the City. The fees are intended for the construction or upgrade of drainage facilities in conformance with the City's Master Drainage Plan. Drainage Impact Fees for the system upgrades are levied only on new developments or parcels that redevelop or substantially remodel. The fees are based on the various different land uses shown in the following schedule: Over the past several years the following projects have been completed using Drainage Impact Fees: 3Z Drainage Fee Schedule Land Use Fee per Acre Residential: 1) Low Density 1) $ 6,283 2) Medium Density 2) $ 7,539 3 High Density 3) $10,052 Commercial/Industrial: $11,309 Over the past several years the following projects have been completed using Drainage Impact Fees: 3Z Parkland, Traffic, Drainage Impact Fees November 24, 09 NO. PROJECTS COST 1 AVIEMORE STORM DRAIN LINING From Aviemore to Talbert Nature Preserve $30,000 2 JAVA STORM DRAIN LINING from Java to Mesa Verde golf course $24,000 3 JAMAICA STORM DRAIN LINING from Jamaica to golf course $22,000 4 17TH AND PLACENTIA STORM DRAIN LINING from Placentia to Pomona $90,000 5 FAIR DRIVE STORM DRAIN from Vanguard to Fairview $500,000 *6 WALNUT PLACE STORM DRAIN from Walnut Place to Irvine Avenue $600,000 SUBTOTAL: $1,266,000 (*This project is also listed as No. 1 on the 20 -year CIP Priority List shown on Attachment 1.) The City Council in August 2006 approved a 20 -year priority list for storm drain improvements throughout the city. It is important to note that when funding becomes available, the drainage fee funds must be used towards the projects listed on the Drainage Project Priority List shown on Attachment 1. As of FY 2009-2010, priority No. 1 (the Walnut Place Storm Drain Project) has been completed. As of October 31, 2009 the amount available for future appropriations from the Drainage Fees Fund is $398,740. Attachment 1: 20 -Year CIP Priority List cc: Public Services Director City Engineer Senior Engineer Transportation Svs. Manager Parks Project Manager Ataff File: 112409PCMemoFees I Date: 112409 1 Time: 1:30 .m. 33 W 20 -year CIP Priority List ATTACHMENT 1 Apr -06 Priority Name From to CBI *D above TC Cost 1 Walnut Street SD System Walnut (@ Knuckle) Irvine &Costa Mesa 0.75 0 to 0.25' $334,421 2 Mesa Verde SDS stem Ceylon Drive Card Lane 0.586 0.26' to 0.5' $400,076 3 Fairview Road SDS stem Belfast/Warren Fairview/McCormack 0.786 0 to 0.5' $788,034 4 Watson Lane SDS stem College Dublin Street 0.34 0 to 0.25' $414,128 5 Van Buren St. SDS stem Atlanta Charlston St. 0.237 0 to 0.25' $619,666 6 Fordham SD. System Fair Drive Hanover Drive 0.708 .26' to .75' $1,308,922 7 Anaheim/Superior SD System Phase I Plummer St. 18th & Crestmont 0.7 0.26' to 0.75' '.'$939,407 8 Anaheim/Superior SD System Phase II 18th & Crestmont Park Drive 0.747 0.51 to 0.75 '$881,415 9 Anaheim/Superior SD System Phase III Park Drive 17th & Pomona 0.75 0.51 to 0.75 $1,402;848 10 Anaheim/Superior SD System Phase IV 17th & Pomona Ohms & Farad 0.82 1.01 to 1.25' $1,056,998 11 Anaheim/Superior SD System Phase V Ohms& Farad 16th & Superior 0.847 1.26 to 1.54 $1,242,030 12 Brentwood/Santa Ana SD ISstem Brentwood Rue De Cannes 0.719 0.76' to 1.0' $793,037 13 Cherry Lake SD System Phase I Westminster & Sherwood 21st & Santa Ana 0.861 0 to 0.5' ,$647,464 . 14 Cherry Lake SD System Phase I I 21st & Santa Ana 22nd & Santa Ana 0.645 .26' to .5' $1,277,594 15 Cherry Lake SD System Phase III 22nd & Santa Ana Vista Baya & Santa Ana 0.381 0.51 to 0.75 $796,537 16 Cherry Lake SD System Phase IV Vista Baya & Santa Ana Waterman Way 0.415 0 to 0.5' $638,932 17 Cherry Lake SD System Phase V Waterman Way Cherry Lake 0.529 0 to 0.5' $1,370,425' 18 West 19th St. SDS stem 1 Monrovia Ave. Westerly City Limits 0.628 0 to 0.25' $823,392 19 West 18th St. SDS stem Monrovia Ave. Westerly City Limits 971 0 to 0.25' $653,489 20 East 17th Street SDS stem Tustin Ave. Irvine Ave. 0.375 0.26' to 0.5' •$1,176,785 * Depth above the top of curb with a 25 -year storm event ATTACHMENT 3 12-14-09 PC Minute Excerpt for Fee Waiver Programs - Unofficial Until Approved 2. Fee Waiver Programs Senior Planner Mel Lee reviewed the information in the staff report and noted this item was suggested by the Planning Commission. He stated that he obtained a copy of the most recent Building Industry Impact Fee Deferral Programs, including the four options. Commissioner McCarthy said this will spur good development in the City. Mr. Lee noted that if a fee waiver request was received, it went to the City Council. He recalled that one developer requested a Planning Processing Fee waiver last year. The Chair and Mr. Lee discussed the Master Plan Fees and Impact Fees, and following the rest of the cities relating to Parkland and Drainage Impact Fees. Commissioner McCarthy commented that there should be a deferral of Impact Fees to promote good development, and be approved by the City Council. Commissioner Mensinger pointed out that developers .choose areas to develop based on markets and the ability to defer costs. Vice Chair Clark commented that deferring fees is a great idea and the Certificate of Occupancy Fee has no meaning until the units are sold. He also said User Fees are cost recovery dollars we collect up front. The Chair stated that he notes a consensus for Option A: One Year Impact Fee Deferral Program. The remaining Commissioners did not disagree. City Engineer Ernesto Munoz cautioned the Commission regarding Drainage Impact Fees, and stated that the fees are collected at the time that it is provided by the Subdivision Map Act. He said the reason why these fees are collected prior to approval of the map is to preclude the possibility of someone subdividing a piece of land and subsequently selling the parcels without meeting the development conditions. Once the map is approved, the land is subdivided and the developer can sell the subdivided lots without executing any of the improvements on those parcels. The new owners will be saddled with the responsibility of making those improvements upon requesting permits from the City to build on the lots. Once the map is approved and recorded, the City has limited recourse to go after the developer to pay for any fees. He also said that many developments cannot move forward without utilities, of which drainage facilities are one. Mr. Munoz pointed out that he assumes the City Attorney's Office will be looking into this request. 15-< A discussion ensued among the Commissioners regarding Drainage Impact Fees and buying property, payment prior to the tract map, and the listing of fees. The Chair noted that legal council is needed. Mr. Munoz stated that in his 30 years of experience, he has seen developers actually walk away from properties, sell the maps or sell the properties, and the new developer expects the agency to come up with those improvements. This can result in a lawsuit. The Chair and Mr. Lee discussed getting direction from the City Council. 3G ATTACHMENT 4 CITY OF COSTA DESA, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY SUBJECT POLICY EFFECTIVE PAGE NUMBER DATE CITY COUNCIL RELATIONS WITH EMPLOYEES 300-6 02-01-99 1.of 2 Rev. 07-15-02 , ;. 0 1= Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section- 2-106 sets forth general provisions relating to communications between the City Council and City employees. The intent of this section of the code is to provide a, framework for processing requests for information from the City Council through the City Manager. As the demand for information has increased and the manner in which information is communicated, has changed with advanced technologies, the need has arisen to refine protocol under the Code. Section 2-106 provides that the City Council and City Manager. may "...vary,the provisions of this section by the establishment of contrary policies". The intent of this policy is to establish those "contrary policies" in terms of City Council, Commissions and Committees' relations with City employees. POLICY It is the purpose of this policy to: 1. Ensure clear guidelines for City Council, Commissions and Committees and City staff in terms of requesting and providing information, research, studies and similar staff responsibilities. 2. Designate appropriate levels of responsibility in responding to requests for information from the City Council, Commissions and Committees in_a timely and accurate, fashion. 3. Require that all reports, studies, memorandum and related staff work be provided concurrently to all members of the City .Council. 1. Routine Inquiries These requests involve the basic "day-to-day" Council Member inquiries, which typically can be handled via the telephone or email. Such requests generally include matters such as meeting schedules, complaint status, reporting service requests, etc. These typically do not require a written report. Such requests may be directed to the City staff assigned responsibility for the program/service under inquiry by a Council Member. 2. Requests for Limited Studies On occasion, Council Members, Commission and Committees will have an interest or need for City staff to research a given subject or issue. Such requests, for purposes of this policy, are those which are defined as taking four (4) hours or less of a City staff 37 C�11"iY�T��I� "-1 `►!iIX+'�a MI, 410101tI_1 COUNCIL POLICY SUBJECT POLICY EFFECTIVE PAGE NUMBER DATE CITY COUNCIL RELATIONS WITH EMPLOYEES 300-6 02-01-99 2 of 2 Rev. 07-15-02 member's time to complete and result in a written report, memorandum, correspondence or similar document. For requests of this nature, the Council Member shall make the request through either the City Manager or the appropriate Department Director. Commissions and Committees may likewise request limited studies by majority vote from a noticed, regular meeting. It is the responsibility of the City Manager or appropriate Department Director, upon receipt of the request, to make a determination as to whether the request can be completed within the time frame above. 3. Requests for Substantial Research New proposals, concepts and ideas brought forward to the full City Council for formal consideration, often require substantial research by City staff beforehand. For purposes of this policy, substantial research is defined as requiring more than four (4) hours of a City staff member's time to complete. Council Members making such requests shall direct same to the City Manager, except for requests for legal research, which shall be directed to the City Attorney. Commissions and Committees shall forward requests for substantial research to the City Council for authorization. The City Manager and the requesting Council Member shall meet to establish the scope of the research desired. If the research can be accommodated within existing staffing levels, and without impact on current assignments, budget or a commitment of City equipment or facilities, the City Manager will assign the research to the appropriate Department Director. 4. Provisions of Reports, Studies and Documents All reports, studies, memorandums, correspondence and related documents prepared pursuant to the provisions of this policy must be provided concurrently to each member of the City Council with a copy to the City Manager. It is the responsibility of the City staff member preparing the preceding to ensure that the information provided is timely, accurate and complete. It is the responsibility of the Department Director to review all such staff work and to ensure it is distributed in accordance with the preceding directive. m