HomeMy WebLinkAbout- - Massage Moratorium Update - 6/1/2010CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 1, 2010 ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF ANY MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT, MANAGER,
AND/OR PRACTITIONER LICENSE: STAFF ACTION REPORT
DATE: MAY 13, 2010
FROM: POLICE DEPARTMENT/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PRESENTATION BY: LES GOGERTY, CAPTAIN (714) 754-5190
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends that City Council take the following action:
1. Receive and file this report.
BACKGROUND:
At the August 18, 2009, City Council meeting, the Council approved an extension of the
urgency ordinance adding an additional 10 -month, 15 -day moratorium on the massage
industry in the city, preventing the issuance of any new massage practitioner, manager, or
establishment licenses, with limited exceptions for replacement workers. The purpose of
this report is to update Council on staff's actions since the passage of the extension to the
moratorium.
Since the moratorium extension was approved by Council, staff has been reviewing and
assessing potential modifications and enhancements to the City's massage ordinance.
This has been in accordance with the newly established guidelines outlined in Senate Bill
731, which was implemented into law in September of 2009. Since this new law has
taken effect, law enforcement has recognized a wide array of concerns, which has
resulted in the California Police Chiefs Association sponsoring Assembly Bill 1822
(Swanson). The Association believes the California Massage Therapy Council, a non-
profit organization that is functioning as a quasi -governmental agency, does not have the
resources to do thorough background investigations of applicants for the state license. It
is also their opinion the system has already been and will continue to be abused by
inappropriate and/or improperly trained applicants slipping through the cracks. In a report
from the California Police Chiefs Association to Assemblyman Swanson it states, "We
recently did a random/regional sample of California Massage Therapy Council applicants
and found that 57% were known prostitutes, 32% were of unknown legitimacy and
required further inquiry, and only 11% were legitimate." Due to this new pending
legislation, staff will need additional time to assess and evaluate the impact it may have
on pending revisions and modifications to the municipal code.
1
Review of Assembly Bill 1822
This is an urgency bill tentatively scheduled to go before the Assembly in June 2010 as
the result of state-wide concern that Business and Professions Code 4600 has left local
jurisdictions without adequate protection against illegitimate massage technicians and
operators engaged in prostitution and other illegal activity. The bill is intended to 1) clarify
the law to make it clear the intent of B&PC 4600 is to give local jurisdictions the power to
issue, oversee and/or revoke the permit of a massage establishment that is engaging in
unprofessional or illegal conduct; and (2) allow local municipalities to require those
administering massage in their jurisdictions to pass a background check with the
applicant paying the reasonable costs associated with a background investigation prior to
a state recognized massage certificate being issued.
Status of Zoning Code Revisions
Currently, massage establishments are a permitted use in commercially -zoned properties
under the City's Zoning Code. During the moratorium period, planning staff contacted
surrounding cities and obtained their Zoning Code provisions for massage
establishments. Based on this information, staff is working on the following revisions to
Title 13 (Zoning Code) as it pertains to massage establishments.
• Require a conditional use permit (CUP) for new massage establishments in all
commercially -zoned properties. The CUP requirement would ensure that new
establishments comply with specific provisions for their operation including, but not
limited to, the following: (1) required training and appropriate documentation for
massage technicians; (2) appropriate clothing and identification for massage
technicians; (3) prohibiting all activities of a sexual nature; (4) requiring massage
establishment to be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition; (5) non -lockable
doors within the establishment; and (6) appropriate hours of operation.
The CUP requirement would not apply to massage that is part of a physical fitness
facility, hotel, or medical or chiropractic offices (in those instances they would be
permitted as an incidental use, subject to a maximum of one or two massage
practitioners).
• Establish a one-year amortization period for existing massage requirements to
obtain a CUP. The purpose of this requirement is to bring the existing massage
establishments into compliance with the operating conditions discussed above
through the CUP process.
• Require a CUP for existing massage establishments that expand or modify their
operation. This would be an additional mechanism to bring existing establishments
into compliance with the operating conditions discussed above. A similar provision
exists for establishments that sell alcoholic beverages that expand or modify their
operations.
• Amend the code declaring massage establishments that do not conform to the
Zoning Code or CUP provisions to be a public nuisance. This requirement would
allow the City to initiate proceedings to either revoke a CUP for a massage
establishment if it is determined to not be in compliance, or shut down a massage
establishment if they do not obtain a CUP.
The Zoning Code amendments will be brought forward for Planning Commission and
City Council consideration in conjunction with the other Municipal Code amendments.
E
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommends that Council receive and file this report. Staff will return to Council on
June 15, 2010 with recommendations regarding the extension of the moratorium.
CHRISTOPHER SHAWKEY
Chief of Police
DISTRIBUTION: City Manager
City Attorney
Finance Director
KIMBERLY HALL BARLOW
City Attorney
City Clerk
Development Services Director
3