Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout- - RDA 7610 Harpers Pointe Attachment 6 - 7/6/2010AbVlsofts IN: REAL ESTATE REDEVELOPMENT AFFoitE7ABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SAN FRANCISCO A.IERRY KEYSER TIMOTHY C. KELLY ]GATE EARLE FUNK DEBBIE M. KERN ROBERT J. WETMORL REED T- KAWAH ARA LOa AKGLLLb KATHLEEN H. HEAP JAMES A. RABE PAUL C. ANDERSON GREGORY D. SPO-HOO KEVIN E. ENGSTROM JULIE L. ROMEY DENISE BIC.KERSTAFF SAN D IGD GERALD M. TKIMBLt PAUL C. MARRA KEYS E R MARSTON AS S O C LATE STM ADVISORS IN rUBLIC/PRIVATE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM To: Muriel Ullman, Neighborhood Improvement Manager Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency From: Kathleen Head Tim Bretz Date: June 24 ,2010 Subject: Baker Street Senior Apartments - Financial Gap Analysis At your request, Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA) prepared a financial gap analysis for the Baker Street Senior Apartments being proposed by USA Properties Fund (Developer). The Developer proposes to acquire an approximately 38,000 square foot parcel (Site) located at 845 West Baker Street and construct a 53 -unit apartment complex which will be restricted to very -low and low income senior citizens (Project). Seven one -bedroom units will be restricted to households which comply with the requirements of the Mental Health Services Act Housing (MHSA) Program. The Developer is requesting financial assistance totaling $1.38 million from the City of Costa Mesa (City) and the Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency (Agency). The purpose of this analysis is to estimate the financial gap associated with the Project. ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT COSTS (TABLE 1) The Developer is proposing to purchase the Site for a purchase price of $3.70 million, which includes $500,000 in lease termination costs. Consequently, the proposed land value portion of the purchase price is estimated at $3.20 million. An appraisal prepared by Novogradac & Company, LLP on May 4, 2010 estimates the land -only value of the Site at $2.50 million. Thus, the proposed land value portion of the purchase price is approximately 28% higher than the appraised value. The Developer should submit a fair market value appraisal of the Site, which confirms the purchase price before the City and Agency enter into a binding transactional agreement. 500 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 1480 Ir LCIS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 )• PHONE: 213 622 8095 )p FAx: 213 622 5204 1006018. C M: K H H: T B: g bd WWW.KEYSERMARSTON.COM 11391.001.036 To: Muriel Ullman, Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency June 24, 2010 Subject: Baker Street Senior Apartments - Financial Gap Analysis Page 2 The Project includes 51 one -bedroom units and two two-bedroom units totaling approximately 49,000 square feet of gross building area (GBA). The direct cost estimates assume prevailing wage requirements will not be imposed on the Project. KMA estimates the total development costs at $14.29 million, while the Developer estimates the total development costs at $14.51 million. The primary differences between the KMA and Developer estimates are: the direct cost contingency allowance; the architecture, engineering and consulting costs; and the construction interest costs. However, the $219,000, or approximately 2%, differential is considered inconsequential for a project of this magnitude. STABILIZED NET OPERATING INCOME (TABLE 2) The Tax Credit program publishes rent standards for projects receiving Tax Credits. The California Redevelopment Law (CRL) defines a calculation methodology to determine the affordable rents for projects assisted with Set -Aside funds. In order for the Agency to be allowed to count the units in the Project towards the production and expenditures proportionality requirements imposed by the CRL, the rents must comply with the CRL affordable housing cost definition. Both the KMA and Developer analyses are based on the following household income and affordable rent standards: Income Restrictions: The tenant's income can not exceed the stricter of: a. CRL income restrictions as defined under California Health and Safety Code Section (Section) 50105 for very -low income households and 50079.5 for low income households; b. The requirements set for in the MHSA Program for the MHSA-designated units; C. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOME (HOME) Program income restrictions as defined under United States Code, Title 26, Section 142 (d)(2)(B); and d. Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits income restrictions as defined under United States Code, Title 26, Section 142 (d)(2)(B). 1006018. CM: KH H:TB:gbd 11391.001.036 To: Muriel Ullman, Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency June 24, 2010 Subject: Baker Street Senior Apartments - Financial Gap Analysis Page 3 2. Affordable Rent Restrictions: Rents applied to all units must reflect the more stringent of: a. CRL very -low and low income rents based on the methodology defined in Section 50053; b. The requirements set forth in the MHSA Program for the MHSA- designated units; C. HOME Program Low rents published annually by HUD; and d. The Tax Credit rents published annually by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC). KMA and the Developer estimated the Project's gross rental income at $581,300, which includes the income derived from the seven Section 8 Project -Based Vouchers (PBVs) issued by the Orange County NOFA. Laundry and miscellaneous income is estimated at $9 per unit per month. Both KMA and the Developer applied a 5% vacancy and collection allowance. The resulting effective gross income (EGI) is estimated by KMA and the Developer at $551,900. As shown in Table 2, KMA and the Developer estimate the residential operating expenses at $262,700. When the Project's EGI is reduced by the operating expenses, KMA and the Developer estimate the stabilized net operating income (NOI) at $289,200. AVAILABLE OUTSIDE FUNDING SOURCES (TABLE 3) KMA estimates the total available outside funding sources as follows: A $2.07 million conventional loan, which is based on the NOI supported by the Project's income without the inclusion of the Section 8 Subsidy. KMA utilized the following conventional loan assumptions: a. A 1.20 debt service coverage ratio; b. A 7.25% interest rate; and C. A 30 -year amortization period. 1006018. CM: KH H:TB:gbd 11391.001.036 To: Muriel Ullman, Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency June 24, 2010 Subject: Baker Street Senior Apartments - Financial Gap Analysis Page 4 2. The seven Section 8 PBVs are estimated to support an additional $657,000 conventional loan, which is based on the following assumptions: a. A 1.20 debt service coverage ratio; b. A 7.25% interest rate; and C. A 15 -year amortization period. 3. The net Tax Credit equity available to the Project is estimated at $7.66 million, which is based on the following assumptions: a. A requested eligible Tax Credit Basis of $8.39 million; b. A gross Tax Credit amount of $9.82 million; and C. A Tax Credit equity rate of $0.78 per gross Tax Credit Dollar. 4. The Developer estimates the Project will be awarded $757,000 in Orange County MHSA funds. 5. The Developer estimates the Project will be awarded $743,000 in Orange County NOFA funds. 6. A $636,000 deferred Developer Fee, or 50% of the estimated Developer Fee, was provided, which is the maximum allowed to be deferred by TCAC. 7. The Developer included a general partner loan of $400,000. KMA estimates the total available outside funding sources for the Project at $12,914,000. In comparison, the Developer estimates the outside funding sources at $13,133,000. This approximately $219,000 differential is due to the difference in total development costs, but is considered inconsequential for a project of this magnitude. FINANCIAL GAP CALCULATION (TABLE 3) The financial gap is estimated by deducting the available outside funding sources from the Project costs. Based on the assumptions outlined in this analysis, KMA calculates the financial gap as follows: Total Development Costs $14,289,000 (Less) Total Available Funding Sources (12,914,000) Financial Gap $1,375,000 Per Unit $25,900 1006018. CM: KH H:TB:gbd 11391.001.036 To: Muriel Ullman, Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency June 24, 2010 Subject: Baker Street Senior Apartments - Financial Gap Analysis Page 5 Thus, KMA concludes the Developer's request of $1.38 million in financial assistance is warranted. However, this amount is conditioned upon an appraisal which verifies the proposed purchase price of the Site. The financial assistance provided by the City and Agency will be comprised of the following: Property Tax Increment Housing Set -Aside (Set -Aside) funds provided by the Agency; 2. Property Tax Increment (TI) funds provided by the Agency; and 3. A City loan of HOME Program funds (HOME Loan). CONCLUSIONS Based on the preceding analysis, KMA concludes the Developer's request of $1.38 million in financial assistance from the City/Agency is warranted. Prior to entering into a binding transactional agreement with the Developer, a fair market value appraisal of the Site should be performed which verifies the purchase price of the property. Attachment 1006018. CM: KH H:TB:gbd 11391.001.036 TABLE 1 ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT COSTS BAKER STREET SENIOR APARTMENTS COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA I. Property Assemblage Costs Property Acquisition Costs 37,897 Sf Land $98 /Sf Land $3,700,000 Buyer Paid Commissions 2 125,000 Relocation Costs' 250,000 Total Property Assemblage Costs $4,075,000 II. Direct Costs 3 Off-site Improvements $0 On-site Improvements 37,897 Sf Land $15 /Sf Land 566,000 Podium Parking Costs 38 Spaces $22,799 /Space 866,000 Residential Shell Costs 41,780 Sf GBA $90 /Sf GBA 3,760,000 Community Room Costs 2,327 Sf GBA $65 /Sf GBA 152,000 Commercial Shell Costs 5,000 Sf GBA $20 /Sf GBA 100,000 Furnishings, Fixtures & Equipment - Contractor Fees / General Requirements 14% Construction Costs 762,000 Contingency Allowance 5% Other Direct Costs 310,000 Total Direct Costs 49,107 Sf GBA $133 /Sf GBA $6,5169000 III. Indirect Costs Architecture, Engineering & Consulting 8% Direct Costs $521,000 Permits & Fees 4 53 Units $10,849 /Unit 575,000 Taxes, Legal & Accounting 3% Direct Costs 167,000 Insurance' 53 Units $3,318 /Unit 176,000 Marketing & Leasing' 53 Units $2,000 /Unit 106,000 Developer Fee 5 15% Eligible Basis 1,272,000 Contingency Allowance 5% Other Indirect Costs 141,000 Total Indirect Costs $299589000 IV. Financing Costs Interest During Construction 6 $6,336,000 Loan Amount 5.25% Interest $366,000 Financing Fees Construction Loan $6,336,000 Loan Amount 1.00 Points 63,000 Permanent Loan $2,065,000 Loan Amount 2.50 Points 52,000 Section 8 Subsidy $657,000 Loan Amount 2.50 Points 16,000 Reserves' Operating 5 Months Operating Expenses / Debt Service 180,000 Replacement 53 Units $0 /Unit - TCAC Fees 7 63,000 Total Financing Costs $740,000 V rotal Construction Costs 49,107 Sf GBA $208 /Sf GBA $10,214,000 rotal Development Costs 49,107 Sf GBA $291 /Sf GBA $14,289,000 ' Based on Developer estimate. 2 The Agency has agreed to include the Buyer Paid Commissions in the Project budget. 3 Estimates assume prevailing wage requirements will NOT be imposed on the Project. 4 Based on estimate provided by City staff. 5 This amount is the maximum allowed by TCAC. 6 Includes debt on the 38% of the Tax Credit Equity which will not be funded during construction. Assumes a 12 -month construction period with a 60% average outstanding balance and a 6 -month absorption period with a 100% average outstanding balance. Includes a $2,000 application fee; $410/unit monitoring fee; and 4% of the gross Tax Credit proceeds for one year. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Baker St Srs 6 23 10; Pro Forma; trb TABLE 2 STABILIZED NET OPERATING INCOME BAKER STREET SENIOR APARTMENTS COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA I. Gross Residential Income' Manager's Unit 1 Unit $0 /Unit/Month $0 1 -Bedroom Units Ca) (532-Sf) $581,300 VL Inc Redev/MHSA/TC @ 30% Median 7 Units $228 /Unit/Month 19,200 VL Inc Redev/TC @ 40% Median 8 Units $672 /Unit/Month 64,500 VL Inc Redev/TC @ 45% Median 6 Units $759 /Unit/Month 54,600 VL Inc Redev/TC @ 50% Median 13 Units $846 /Unit/Month 132,000 Low Inc Redev/TC @ 60% Median 16 Units $1,021 /Unit/Month 196,000 2 -Bedroom UnitsoC (782-Sf) Services 53 Units $226 /Unit VL Inc Redev/TC @ 30% Median 1 Unit $597 /Unit/Month 7,200 VL Inc Redev/TC @ 50% Median 1 Unit $951 /Unit/Month 11,400 Section 8 Subsidy 1 -Bedroom Units Ca) (532-Sf) VL Inc Redev/MHSA/TC @ 30% Median 7 Units $1,083 /Unit/Month 91,000 Laundry/Miscellaneous Income 53 Units $9 /Unit/Month 5,400 Gross Income $581,300 (Less) Vacancy & Collection Allowance 5% Gross Income (29,400) Effective Gross Income $551,900 II. Operating Expenses General Operating Expenses 53 Units $3,700 /Unit $196,100 Property Taxes 2 53 Units $470 /Unit 24,900 Services 53 Units $226 /Unit 12,000 MHSA Servicing Fee 53 Units $60 /Unit 3,200 Replacement Reserve 53 Units $500 /Unit 26,500 Total Operating Expenses $262,700 III. I Net Operating Income $289,200 Based on Orange County 2010 Incomes distributed by HUD/HCD. As pertinent, the rents are based on rents published in 2010 by TCAC and California Health and Safety Code Section 50053. Utility Allowances per the Orange County Housing Authority: $25 for 1-Bdrm units and $30 for 2- Bdrm units, which includes gas cooking, gas heating, gas water heating, basic electric and water. 2 Based on Developer estimate. Assumes that the Developer will receive the property tax abatement accorded to non-profit housing organizations that develop income -restricted apartments. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Baker St Srs 6 23 10; Pro Forma; trb TABLE 3 FINANCIAL GAP CALCULATION BAKER STREET SENIOR APARTMENTS COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA I. Available Funding Sources Permanent Loan - Base Income Net Operating Income Income Available for Mortgage Interest Rate Permanent Loan Permanent Loan - Section 8 Subsidy' Effective Gross Income Income Available for Debt Service Interest Rate Total Permanent Loan - Section 8 Subsidy Tax Credit Equity 2 Gross Tax Credit Value Syndication Rate Net Tax Credit Equity Orange County MHSA3 Orange County NOFA3 Deferred Developer Fee GP Loan 3 Total Available Funding Sources $202,810 NOI (See Table 2) 1.20 DCR 7.25% Interest Rate $86,390 EGI 1.20 DCR 7.25% Interest Rate $9,815,000 $0.78 /Tax Credit Dollar $169,008 Debt Service 8.19% Mortgage Constant $71,990 Debt Service 10.95% Mortgage Constant $2,065,000 $657,000 $7,656,000 $757,000 $743,000 $636,000 $400,000 $12,914,000 II. Financial Gap Calculation Total Available Funding Sources $12,914,000 (Less) Total Development Costs (14,289,000) Financial Surplus / (Financial Gap) 53 Units ($25,900) /Unit ($1,375,000) 1 Assumes the Section 8 Subsidy will be provided for a guaranteed term of 15 years. 2 Assumes an $8.39 million requested eligible basis, which includes a $1.41 million voluntary exclusion, a 130% difficult -to -develop premium, a 9.0% Tax Credit rate and an applicable fraction of 100%. 3 Based on Developer estimate. 4 Assumes the Developer will defer 50% of the Developer Fee. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: Baker St Srs 6 23 10; Pro Forma; trb